Showing 1 to 3 out of 3 results

• Text
  EEBO-TCP (Phase 2)
  
  A vvord to Dr. VVomocke. Or, A short reply to his pretended resolution of Mr. Croftons position concerning ministers use of an imposed liturgie. To which is annexed, a blow at Jerubbaal redivivus: discovering his weakness and errours in defence of his groundless secession from solemn publick worship ministred by the English liturgie. By R.S. the publisher of reformation not separation.
  Date of publication:
  1663
  

  Author(s):

  R. S.
  Description:
  A reply to: Womock, Laurence. Aron-bimnucha, or, An antidote to cure the Calamites of their trembling for fear of the Ark. Reproduction of the original in the Worcester College Library, Oxford.
   This item contains 4 files (255.48 KB).
   
  Publicly Available

• ---

• Text
  EEBO-TCP (Phase 2)
  
  By the Lord Lieutenant and Council. Ormonde. We cannot but call to mind that as the declaration set out and published by the late lords justices and council, bearing date the 30th. of April, 1662. did so far indulge those recusants, non-conformists and sectaries, who were misguided and did not conform to the laws of the land, concerning uniformity of common prayer and service in the church, and the administration of the sacraments ...
  Date of publication:
  1663
  

  Author(s):

  Ireland. Lord Lieutenant (1662-1669 : Ormonde) ; Ormonde, James Butler, Duke of, 1610-1688. ; Ireland. Parliament.
  Description:
  "Given at the council-chamber in Dublin the 29th. day of June, 1663." Reproduction of original in the Bodleian Library.
   This item contains 4 files (40.39 KB).
   
  Publicly Available

• ---

• Text
  EEBO-TCP (Phase 2)
  
  Jerubbaal justified: or, A plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton his reformation not separation or, a plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration, to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument: as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme. To which is added a position, disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy.
  Date of publication:
  1663
  

  Author(s):

  R. S. ; Crofton, Zachary, 1625 or 6-1672. Reformation not separation.
  Description:
  A reply to Crofton's Reformation not separation. This is a replacement for incomplete S130 on reel 1046. Cf. Wing (2nd ed.). Reproductions of originals in: Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.). Library (reel 1046:5) ...
   This item contains 4 files (363.55 KB).
   
  Publicly Available

• ---