IT is some months since I read your Book entitled "The Age of Reason, part second, being an investigation of true and fabulous Theology:" and do not scruple to pronounce it one of the most violent and systimatic attacks on the word of God, that ever was made; not on 'ac­count of the novelty of the objections contained therein, for in truth there is no novelty in them, but from the acri­mony and abuse; the illiberal satire, pretended ridicule, and impertinent wit­ticism, so liberally scattered throughout the performance; and which, coming from the pen of a man that has acted so distinguished a part on the theatre of the political world; and whose writings have been read with avidity in almost all parts of Europe, may perhaps, be of fatal [Page 4]consequence to the faith of many: I, therefore, was determined to endeavour to apply an antidote to the venom of your poison of infidelity; (as far as my poor abilities would allow) but being then engaged in translating the Prayers of our nation, from Hebrew into En­glish, and arranging the copy for the second volume of my Dissertations on the Prophecies of the Old Testament, I was obliged to postpone it till the pre­sent: at the same time hoping that some one, far more capable, would have un­dertaken the laudable task, and thus have rendered my interference unnecessa­ry. But, although several answers have been written, by men of great abilities, yet, I humbly presume to think, that there is still much to be said on the sub­ject: especially as you seem to treat Christian priests and preachers with such contempt, that it is to be supposed you pay but little attention to their arguments, as you think^* "that they only waste their time, and heat themselves in frac­tious [Page 5]disputes about doctrinal points drawn from the Bible." You are also pleased, in a self conceited important tone, to tell them that their answers to the first part of your Age of Reason, is as "cobwebs brushed away by accident." It therefore is to be hoped that these letters, written by one that is neither a Christian priest, nor a preacher; and who consequently has no interest in preaching up tithes, as he is but a poor, simple Levite, without any living in the Jewish Church, may find grace in your sight, and not be considered as "cobwebs brushed away by accident;" and thus obtain a favourable reception, not in the vain hope of making you a proselyte to revelation, but only to shew you, that you are not possessed of a thorough knowledge of the subject of which you treat: it therefore, is no wonder, that you have blindly followed Morgan, Tin­dal, Bolingbroke, Hume, Voltaire, Spi­noza, &c. all of whom, have long since started one or other of the objections, that you have been collecting as it were [Page 6]to a focus, in order to dazzle the eyes of the ignorant and unwary: the fallacy of some of them, I have already exposed;^* and with God's blessing, hope to shew the futility of all the others.

I know not your motive for thus attack­ing the word of God: nor will I be so uncharitable as to ascribe it to malevo­lence: I will not question your sincerity, though I cannot approve of your mode of attack; it is not the manner of a sin­cere enquirer after truth; but of one, who affects to be free from vulgar preju­dice, and of being thought wiser than the rest of mankind: it is this, that has led many into insidelity. But, whether it is the love of truth, fame, ambition, or malevolence, that has induced you to take this step, I will candidly consider your arguments, and reason freely with you [Page 7]on the subject, without the least asperity; and although I cannot flatter myself with the hopes of convincing you of the truth of Revelation; yet, if I should be so happy, as to save but one soul from im­bibing the poison of your pernicious tenets, I shall think my labour well rewarded.

IT is not my intention in these Letters to follow you step by step through all your turnings and windings, as that would answer no other end but to bewilder the Reader, as seems to have been your inten­tion: it will be sufficient for our purpose, if we can prove the absurdity and falsity of your position, in the plainest manner possible: I shall, therefore, consider your objections against the Old Testament, in the following order: First, as to Moses being the Author of the books ascribed to him. Second, as to the doctrines con­tained in those books. After which I shall proceed to consider your objections to the prophets, the phrophetical books, as also the others contained in the Old Testament.

You observe, (p. 5.) "My intention is to shew that those books (the five books of Moses) are spurious, and that Moses is [Page 9]not the author of them: and still further, that they were not written in the time of Moses, nor till several hundred years af­terwards," &c. The proofs you adduce, are, first, that^* "the whole of these books is in the third person; it is always the Lord said unto Moses, or Moses said unto the Lord, &c. and this," you observe, "is the style and manner that historians use, in speaking of the persons whose lives and actions they are writing." Thus you argue, to prove that Moses did not write the Pentateuch: though, as if sensible of the weakness of your argument, you seem to abandon it immediately after, by al­lowing that, according to grammatical right, a man may speak of himself in that manner^†. But, if you had the least know­ledge of the language in which Moses wrote, its genius, idiom and phraseology, so different from all others, you would certainly not have trifled thus with your readers: for allowing your objection all [Page 10]its force, it does not prove that Moses was not the author of the Pentateuch; nay, it in some measure proves that he was the author: this will clearly be per­ceived, when we consider the different parts of the Pentateuch; and arrange them under their proper heads, viz. His­torical and Preceptical. Now, as some parts are purely historical, it was proper that he should write in the style that his­torians generally write in. For in the name of goodness, let me ask, in what other style ought Moses to have written when he wrote the historical part of the Pentateuch? The whole book of Genesis is historical, and the facts related therein, are prior to the birth of Moses: he must therefore have received an account of them; and this account, he received from God; he therefore, very properly, wrote as one that is dictated to by another. And this, he expressly informs us of him­self, Numb. xxxiii. 2. "And Moses wrote their goings out according to their journies, according to the word ^* of the Lord."

[Page 11] Hence the propriety of Moses writing in the third person, as an historian, is ma­nifest; and which, if duly considered, will presently shew the futility of your reason­ing on the subject; for as Moses wrote what God dictated to him, your objection to the historical and chronological evi­dence, instantly falls to the ground: for as God is Omniscient; with him there can be no futurity; he could therefore, as easily instruct Moses to write what was to happen in five or six hundred years, as he was able to acquaint him with what happened at the creation, or on the very day that Mo­ses wrote. Hence also, it is manifest that, your objection against the expression of Moses, (Gen. chap. xiv. ver. 14.) of A­braham's pursuing the enemy to Dan, "that there was no such place as Dan till many years after the death of Moses; and consequently that Moses could not be the writer of the book of Genesis, where this account of pursuing them unto Dan is given."^* is of no force to invalidate the historical and chronological evidence of [Page 12]the books ascribed to Moses, as the author of them; because, he did not pretend to write those things of his own knowledge, but only as they were dictated to him by the Almighty, to whom all events are known.

As the same argument equally applies to what you advance concerning the kings of Edom that reigned before any king reigned in Israel: of the manua which the children of Israel eat till they came to the borders Canaan; and con­cerning the bed of Og, &c. it would be only wasting of time to shew the fallacy of them; as it must be visible to the meanest capacity. I shall however, take notice of what you advance concerning the slimsy pretence of prophecy, as you are pleased to call it.

You say,^* "the two instances I have given would be sufficient, without any ad­ditional evidence, to invalidate the authen­ticity of any book that pretended to be four or five hundred years more ancient than the matters it speaks of, or refers to, [Page 13]as facts; for in the case of pursuing them unto Dan, and of the kings that reigned over the children of Israel, not even the flimsy pretence of prophecy can be plead­ed. The expressions are in the preter tense, and it would be downright idotism to say that a man could prohesy in the preter tense." Here sir, we have a spe­cimen of your profound criticism, and the great knowledge you have of pro­phetic writing: What! attempt to criti­cise on the Bible, and not know that prophecies are sometimes delivered in the preter tense! Do you not know, (and if you do not, it is civility to inform you) that the delivery of prophecy in the pre­preter tense is often made use of, and which is to shew the truth of it; as if it were already come to pass? This is well known to all those that are in the least acquainted with the prophetic writings; numerous instances of which might be ad­duced, if it was necessary.

It must also be considered that Moses was not prophesying then; but writing of history, under the guidance of the [Page 14]supreme being? he therefore related things as if they were actually come to pass, being directed by God so to do: and which accounts for all your objec­tions to the historical and chronological evidence of the books ascribed to Moses.

That Moses wrote those books by di­vine inspiration, is manifest from the ex­act accomplishment of every event fore­told by him. Of this, I shall produce such clear and unequivocal proofs, as to strike the Deist and infidel dumb.

That which I shall principally insist up­on, is the dreadful denunciations of Moses relating to our dispersion, wherein he tells us, (Levit. xxvi. 33. and Deut. xxviii. 64.) that we shall be scattered over the face of the whole earth, among all nations: but what is most wonderful, he tells us, that we shall nevertheless remain a SEPARATE people, capable of being gathered together in the latter days. This he assures us of in the following words. "And yet for all that, when they be in the land of their enemies, I will not cost them away, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break [Page 15]my covenant with them: for I am the Lord their God ^*. This sir, is corro­borated by the other prophets, (whom you have also been pleased to treat with such contempt) for Jeremiah observes (chap. xxx. 11.) "For I am with thee, saith the Lord, to save thee: though I make a full end of all the nations whi­ther I have dispersed thee, yet I will not make a full end of thee, but I will cor­rect^† thee in measure; and will not alto­gether consume thee." And Amos (chap. ix. 8.) says, "Behold, the eyes of the Lord God are upon the sinful kingdom; and I will destroy it from off the face of the earth; yet will I not ut­terly destroy the house of Jacob, saith the Lord. For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations; as (one that) sifteth (corn) with a sieve: and a grain shall not fall upon the ground." That is, the collect­ive body of the nation shall not be de­stroyed; as I shall shew at large in the [Page 16]explanation of that prophecy, in my dis­sertations on the prophecies of the Old Testament: the second volume of which, is just published.

Hence it is manifest, that although Moses and the other prophets, assure us that, the nation should be scattered among all nations, and sorely afflicted; yet should they not be utterly destroyed, as was the case of other nations, as we see it fully verified at this day. And now, sir, give me leave to ask you, how it was possible for Moses, without being divinely inspired, to foresee that, the dreadful punishments which he had de­nounced against them, should be so fully accomplished, as they are allowed on all hands to be; because, a number of ac­cidents might have arisen, to prevent their completion, which no human fore­sight could have foreseen? As for in­stance, the greatest part of our sufferings have arisen from the persecutions which we have suffered from Christians, on ac­count of the difference of religion, and the charge brought against us, of cruci­fying the Lord of life, and Saviour of the [Page 17]world. Now, if this had not taken place, it is most probable, that we should not have suffered such cruel and dreadful per­secutions, &c. as we have experienced for so many hundred years.

Again, how could he foresee, but that the nation, after its being driven out of its own country, scattered in all parts, and suffering such misery, might not thereby be induced entirely to abandon Judaism; and so fall in with the religion of the dif­ferent countries, where they were dis­persed: and thus become incorporated with them, and entirely swallowed up among them; as has been the case of the greatest monarchies. Indeed, nothing could, or would be more probable: for as to what some Deists (who when driven from one entrenchment, retire into ano­ther, and from that into a third; and all along behave like an adversary who fights, not with the hopes of success, but for the vain glory of not yielding till he can hold out no longer) pretend, that the law he gave them, which contained the prohibi­tion of meats, intermarriages with other [Page 18]nations, &c. is the sole cause of it, is pu­erile, and carries its own confutation with it. Because, as I have observed, how was he sure, that as well as they fell into ido­latry, and other enormous crimes, they would not violate those prohibitory pre­cepts, whose transgression was so much less heinous; and thus be mingled among the nations: for surely, nothing else could in all human probability be expected; considering what they have suffered dur­ing this long and dreadful captivity; for I am free to assert, no nation ever suffered the like, during a space of almost eighteen hundred years. But Moses, contrary to all human foresight, informs us, that not­withstanding the severe, and almost unpa­ralleled chastisements that they should ex­perience, yet, should they still be preserv­ed a distinct nation. How exactly [...] hath been fulfilled to this very day, [...] not be insisted upon; as it is [...] every eye, and manifest to the [...] capacity; although a period of upwards of three thousand years hath elapsed since the delivery of this prophecy. I there­fore would sain ask you, or any other [Page 19]Deist, Whether it was possible that Moses, or any other person could foresee such a wonderful event, by any human means whatever; or how you, or they, can ac­count for it, on any other scheme, than that of divine prescience?

If we enter into particulars, we shall find, that all the punishments which he denounced against them, have been so ex­actly fulfilled in every particular, that it is no wonder, if infidels were to have recourse to the old hackneyed objections, that the facts were prior to the predicti­ons, and that the prophecies were written after the histories. If, therefore, the ac­complishment of the preceding prophecy, which may properly be called, a standing miracle, even to this very day, the like of which hath never been seen or heard of in the world, should not be able to con­vince you or other unbelievers, how can we expect that any other argument should, how strong soever? But, as I would not by any means, omit adducing any argument that may serve to illustrate the subject, or tend to carry conviction home to the doubting and wavering mind, [Page 20]I shall just take a brief view of the accom­plishment of some of the most remarkable of these denunciations.

He tells them, that numbers of them shall be destroyed. "And ye shall be left few^* in number," &c. This, not to men­tion the other slaughters and massacres which they have suffered, was fully veri­fied in the last siege of Jerusalem, when invested by Titus; when, as Josephus says,^† an infinite multitude perished by famine: for he computes that, during the whole siege, the number of those that were destroyed by that and the sword, amounted to eleven hundred thousand, as the people were assembled from all parts to celebrate the passover; and Basnage gives us an account of one million, three hundred and thirty nine thousand, six hundred and ninety persons, that were destroyed in Jerusalem, and other pants of Judea, exclusive of ninety nine the sand two hundred, taken prisoners, as he has collected from the accounts of Josephus^‡. [Page 21]Indeed, there is not a nation upon earth, that hath suffered such a number of mas­sacres and persecutions: their history a­bounds with little else; and if God had not promised them his particular protec­tion, the whole race, would long ere this have been extirpated; for as Basnage ob­serves,^* "Here is also another circum­stance, that heightens this prodigy. This forlorn and persecuted nation can scarce find one place in the universe to rest their heads, or to set their seet in. They have waded through floods of their own blood, and are as yet preserved. That infinite number of Jews, which we shall see here­after murdered through a cruel and bar­barous zeal, weakened, but did not destroy that nation. For notwithstanding the joint persecutions of Christians and Idolators, who designed their ruin, they are still in being."

He also told them, "And ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it."^† This is most [Page 22]singular, and really worthy of observation, that even before they had entered the land to take possession of it, he assures them, that if they disobeyed the Lord's commandments, they should be plucked off from it. Now, I defy you, or any one else, to produce any instance of a legista­tor ever staking his reputation thus; and the exact manner it hath been fulfilled, is clear from their history; for they were indeed plucked off from their own land, when the ten tribes were carried away captive by the king of Assyria; and of whom we know nothing certain to this hour; and when the other two tribes were carried captive to Babylon: but more especially, when their city and tem­ple were destroyed, and the nation carried captive by the Romans.

From that time to this, their country hath been in the possession of foreign lords and masters, few Jews living in it; and those of a low and poor condition. A celebrated Jew of the twelfth century,^* who travelled into all parts to visit his bre­thren, [Page 23]and inform himself of the exact state of their affairs, acquaints us that Jerusalem was almost entirely abandoned by the Jews; for he did not find there, above two hundred persons,^* who were mostly dyers of wool; the monoply of which trade they purchased every year. They all lived together under David's tower, and made very little figure. In other parts, he found one or two in a city, in another twenty, in others more; and in many none at all. An accurate and faithful English traveller,^† who had been in the holy land says, that, "It is for the most part, now inherited by Moors and Arabians; those possessing the valleys, and these the mountains. Turks there be few: but many Greeks with other chris­tians of all sects and nations, such as im­pute to the place an adherent holiness. Here be also some Jews, yet inherit they no part of the land, but in their own country do live as aliens."

He also informs them, that they should be scattered among all nations; "And [Page 24]thou shalt be removed into all the king­doms of the earth^*." Again, "And the Lord shall scatter thee among all the peo­ple,^† from one end of the earth even unto the other."^‡ This indeed, hath ben most amply fulfilled since the great dispersion of the Jews by the Romans. For what people have been scattered so far and wide as they? and where is the nation that is a stranger to them, or to which they are strangers? They swarm in many parts of the east, are spread through most of the countries of Europe and Africa, are pretty numerous in the West Indies, and there are several families of them in America. They circulate, as a Christian author says, (Bishop Newton) through all parts were trade and money circulate; and are, as I may say, the brokers of the whole world.

But though they were to be thus dis­persed; yet he assured them that, they should not be to tally destroyed, (as already mentioned) "And yet for all that, when they be in the land of their ene­mies," &c^§. On this, an author of great [Page 25]note,^* observes, and what a marvellous thing is it, that after so many wars, bat­tles and sieges; after so many fires, fa­mines and pestilences; after so many re­bellions, massacres and persecutions; after so many years of captivity, slavery and misery, they are not destroyed utterly, and though scattered among all people, yet subsist as a distinct people by themselves: where is there any thing comparable to this to be found in all the histories, and in all the nations under the sun?"

But though they should not be utterly destroyed, yet should they suffer much, and not have rest long in any place. "And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest^†," This hath indeed been fully verified; for they have been so far from finding rest, that they have been banished from place to place, from country to country. In many places, they have been banished, and recalled, and banished again. I shall just take no­tice of some of their great banishments in [Page 26]modern times, from countries well known. About the latter end of the thirteenth^* century, they were banished from England by Edward I.^† and were not permitted to return and settle there again, till Crom­well's time, or rather under Charles the second. In the latter end of the fifteenth century, as Mariana observes,^‡ they were banished from Spain, by Ferdinand and Isabella: and according to his account, there were seventy thousand families, or eight hundred thousand persons, that left Spain upon the execution of this edict. Some^§ reckon an hundred and twenty thousand families. They were indeed received in Portugal by John II. but he made them pay a dear price for a refuge; and a few years after they were banished by his successor Emanuel; who violated his faith with them, "By depriving them of their liberty to carry away their chil­dren under fourteen years of age, which reduced them to that despair, that some of them killed themselves, and others sa­crificing [Page 27]nature to their religion, turned executioners to their own bowels."^* This leads us to what Moses says, concerning their children, "Thy sons and thy daugh­ters shall be given unto another people, and thine eyes shall look, and fail with longing for them all the day along: and there shall be no might in thine hand."^† How exactly hath all this been fulfilled in several countries; but especially in Spain and Portugal, where they formerly were so numerous; and where their children were taken from them by order of the government, to be educated in the Popish religion; as mentioned in the first pro­phecy of Moses, in my Dissertations on the prophecies, Vol. I. page 32. And Basnage^‡ observes, that the fourth coun­cil of Toledo, ordered that all their chil­dren should be forced from them, for fear they should partake of their errors; and that they should be shut up in monaste­ries, to be instructed in the Christian truths. He adds, "We shall see in the [Page 28]sequel the lamentable effects of these rapes." And it has been shewn, under the preceding head, that when they were banished from Portugal, all their children under fourteen years of age, were taken from them, and baptized. A practice not at all justifiable adds the historian.^*

He also tells them, that they shall be oppressed and spoiled continually. "And thou shalt be only oppressed, and spoiled evermore, and no man shall save thee,"^† &c. Now it is well known what frequent seizures have been made of their effects, in almost all countries, either to supply the necessities of the state, or the luxury of the prince: How often have they been fined and fleeced by almost all govern­ments? How often have they been forced to redeem their lives by sums extorted from them? The instances are innumera­ble. I shall just mention what an Eng­lish historian^‡ says, that Henry III. "Al­ways polled the Jews at every low ebb of his fortunes. One Abraham, who was found delinquent, was forced to pay seven [Page 29]hundred marks for his redemption. Aa­ron, another Jew, protested that the king had taken from him at times, thirty thou­sand marks of silver, besides two hundred marks of gold, which he had presented to the queen."

And in the year 1240, when the king attempted to fleece them to the utmost, a most respectable author observes,^* that he "commanded all the Jews of both sexes throughout England, to be impri­soned, till they would make a discovery of their wealth: which he appointed officers to receive in every county, and return to his exchequer. Many of them, no doubt, pleaded poverty, or pretended to have given up all: but as the tyrant was in earnest to have their last farthing, he extorted it by the most cruel torments."

Stow says, that the generality of them had one eye put out. And Matthew Pa­ris^† tells us, that from one particular Jew at Bristol, the king demanded no less than ten thousand marks of silver, (a prodigi­ous [Page 30]sum in those days!) which being re­solutely denied him, he commanded one of his great teeth to be pulled out daily, till he consented. The poor man had the courage to hold out seven operations, but then, sinking under the pain, ransomed the remainder of his teeth, at the price demanded. And when they were banish­ed in the reign of Edward I. their estates, &c. were confiscated, which brought im­mense sums to the crown. Thus have they been served, almost every where; a plain demonstration of the full accomplish­ment of this prediction.

In verse 34 he says, "Thou shalt be mad, for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see." And have we not seen into what madness and desperation they have been driven by the oppressions, ex­tortions, and cruel usage they have expe­rienced? Have they not in mere fury and desperation destroyed themselves, their wives and children? Josephus^* mentions, that after the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, some of the Jews took refuge in the castle of Nasada, where being closely [Page 31]besieged by the Romans, they, by the persuasion of their leader, Eleazer, first murdered their wives and children; after which, they chose ten men by lot to slay the rest; when this was done, they chose one of the ten to kill the other nine in like manner; which having performed, he set fire to the place, and then stabbed himself. There were nine hundred and sixty, who perished in this miserable man­ner. Instances of the like behaviour hath often occurred since; I shall only take notice of one mentioned in English histo­ry. When in the reign of Richard I. the people rose in arms to make a general massacre of them, fifteen hundred of them retired into York castle,^* where being closely besieged, they offered to capitu­late, and to ransom their lives with mo­ney. The offer being refused, one of them cried in despair, That it was better to die courageously for the Law, than to fall into the hands of the Christians. Every [Page 32]one immediately took his knife, and stab­bed his wife and children. The men af­terwards retired into the king's palace, and set it on fire, in which they consumed themselves with the palace and furniture.

He tells them, that in this dreadful captivity, they shall serve other gods.—"And thou shalt serve other gods, wood and stone."^* Again, "And there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known,"^† &c. This hath been exactly fulfilled during this woful captivity, when the Jews in Spain, and other countries were obliged to com­ply with the idolatrous worship of the church of Rome, &c. and to bow down to stocks and stones, rather than to have their effects seized and confiscated, or their pesons murdered by the inquisition, &c. which has caused fuch a number to apostatize^‡, &c.

In verse 37, he tells them, "And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a by-word among all nations whither [Page 33]the Lord shall lead thee." Hath not this been fulfilled, and as we may say, is ful­filling every day? Is not the pretended avarice, usury, and hard heartedness of a Jew become proverbial? Is it not said, that their very countenances commonly distin­guish them from the rest of mankind? And has not a great master of nature, drawn the portrait of a Jew, in a most detestable character, in his Jew of Venice? Do not Heathens, Christians and Maho­metans, however they may differ in other points, yet agree in abusing, vilifying and persecuting the Jews? And has not a Christian writer † of our time, vilified them in a most unwarrantable manner; although it is well known, that there is not a people on earth, more friendly and favorable to good order and good govern­ment, or more obedient to their rulers, than they are? Yet, are they treated in all respects, as if they were of another species.

He also tells them, that, "The Lord will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues,^* [Page 34]and of long continuance^*," &c. And have not their calamities been of long continu­ance? Have they not continued upwards of seventeen hundred years? Their for­mer captivities were very short in compa­rison of this: besides the time of their redemption was well known and ascer­tained: and during the Babylonish capti­vity, they had prophets^† among them, who exhorted and comforted them; but during this long and dreadful captivity, there is not one true prophet among them, to inform them of the end of their cala­mities; as the psalmist says, "We see not our signs, (there is) no more any pro­phet, neither (is there) among us any that knoweth how long^‡." In their former captivities, they had the consolation of being together in one place: in Egypt, they dwelt together in the land of Goshen; and they were all carried together to Ba­bylon; but at present they are scattered all over the face of the earth. What na­tion hath ever suffered so much, and yet continued so long? What nation hath sub­sisted [Page 35]as a distinct people even in their own country, so long as these have done, tho' dispersed in all countries, without having any place they can call their own? And what a standing miracle is this, thus ex­hibited to the view and observation of the whole world?

Lastly, he tells them that they shall be carried into Egypt again, and exposed to sale as slaves, but there would be none to purchase them. "And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again^*, in ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bond-men and bond-women, and no man shall buy you." This, is a striking contrast to what happened to them when Moses brought them out from Egypt; for then, they came out in a triumphant man­ner, as mentioned Exod. xiv. 8. "And the children of Israel went out with an high hand." But now, he says, they shall return thither as slaves. This was fully accomplished; for it appears from Jose­phus,^† that in the reign of the two first [Page 36]Prolemies, a number of Jews were slaves in Egypt. And when Jerusalem was ta­ken by Titus,^* he sent many of them cap­tives, who were above seventeen years of age, bound to the works in Egypt: those under seventeen, were sold; but so little care was taken of these captives, that ele­ven thousand of them perished for want. The markets were so overstocked with them, that as Josephus says elsewhere, they were sold with their wives and chil­dren at the lowest price. And after their last overthrow by Adrian, many thous­ands of them were sold; and those that could not be sold were transported into Egypt; and perished by shipwreck or fa­nine, or were massacred by the inhabit­ants. All which is a manisest proof of the accomplishment of this remarkable de­nunciation, in every particular.

These sir, are manifest proofs of pro­phecies: of prophecies delivered above three thousand years ago: and which we nevertheless plainly see fulfilling in the world at this very time: and what strong­er proof can we have, or desire, of the [Page 37]divine legation of Moses? For what le­gislator durst ever attempt to stake his credit thus, by denouncing such severe de­minciations against a nation for disobe­dience of religious ceremonies only: for as to what deists assert, that any wife and intelligent lawgiver might easily foresee that, the observance of the judicious laws instituted by him, would tend to make a nation flourish, and that the rejection of them would lead to their ruin, is futile: because such foresight could at any rate only comprehend political institutions; and therefore, the non observance of such might end in the loss of their liberty, or the subversion of their government: and which might easily be foreseen. But even this, was not always the consequence: for although we find, that the Lacedemo­nians did not make so great a figure, after they had fallen from the observation of the rudes which Lycurgus (whose sole aim was to train them to war) had en­joined them; because they could not then make war against, conquer, and command all those round them; yet we find, that [Page 38]the Romans, on the contrary, advanced their state to the highest pitch of glory. after they had changed the constitution from what it was in Numa's days; whose only concern was, that Rome should con­tinue in peace and amity. Whence it is manifest, that Moses, could never have foreseen by any human sagacity, the ca­lamities which have befallen them, as the consequence of the transgression of laws purely religious: as it is impossible, ac­cording to the laws of nature, that a na­tion, as a collective body, and state of go­vernment, should be happy or miserable, merely for the sake of religious institu­tions, whose object was not peace or war: and yet, we see with what exact­ness these particular predictions have been fulfilled: Can we then in reason any longer doubt the divine mission of Moses? I really know not, how these instances may affect you, or any other unbelievers, but for my own part, I must freely acknowledge, that they not only convince, but astonish and amaze me, beyond utterance. They are indeed, what Moses predicted they should be, [Page 39]a sign a wonder for ever, as he says, in chap. xxviii. 45-46, "Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall porsue thee and overtake thee, till thou be destroyed; because thou heark­enedst not unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep his commandments, and his statues which he commanded thee. And they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder, and upon thy feed for ever." For they are a sign of their re­bellion against God, and a wonder of their preservation, amidst all those dreadful ca­lamities which they have suffered for so many hundred years.

I shall now proceed to take notice of the character of Moses, as stated in the Bible, to see if it is as you say,^* "the most harrid that can be imagined," I am confident, it will appear to be the very reverse of what you have asserted it to be. The evidence that I shall produce will be such as you can have no objection to, as it is the same that you make use of your­self;^† I mean the books themselves. So far we are agreed. Now for the proof.

[Page 40] According to the account we have in these books of the first calling of Moses to his mission, it does not appear that he was a vain and arrogant coxcomb; but on the contrary, it shews him to be a meek and humble person; one that was fully sensible of the importance of the business he was to engage in; and, there­fore, he says to God^*, "Who (am) I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel from Egypt? In this humble state of mind he continued, till the Lord was angry^† with him, and commanded him to go. When he came to Pharaoh, he did not behave like an arrogant coxcomb^‡, but with a becoming dignity, unappalled at the presence of the Egyptian king, in all his pomp and pride, he acted like the messenger of the greatest king, who he was confident was able to protect him; and of whose omnipotent power, he con­stantly endeavoured to make them sensi­ble: for which reason, he always warn­ed them of the day that the plague was to commence, and also granted their re­quest [Page 41]to remove it; and that, at their own appointed time: as he himself says^*, "According to thy word: that thou may­est know that (there is) none like unto the LORD our God." Thus did he en­deavour to make Pharaoh sensible with whom he was contending; and that he ought, therefore, to submit so him, and to save himself and his people from the destruction that would certainly attend his disobedience. This, Sir, is not the behaviour of an arrogant coxcomb, nor yet that of a detestable ^† villain; but on the contrary, that of a pious, virtuous person, who tried every means in his power to a­vert the dreadful judgment that hung over Pharaoh and his people for their wickedness.

When he brought the nation forth from Egypt, with what gentleness did he lead them! even "as a nursing father, beareth the sucking^‡ child." With what patience did he bear their frequent re­proaches and murmurings. But when they were in danger of being destroyed, [Page 42]what public spirit, what love did he shew for his people^*! How often did he ear­nestly supplicate the supreme being in their behalf, to save them from the pu­nishment they had so justly merited for their sins. And when he was fully assured of his death,^† his only concern was for them; earnestly requesting God to appoint [...] to govern them, "that the congregation of the LORD, might not be as sheep that have no shephered." And now, give me leave to ask you, whether this action shews him to be an impostor? for had he aspired to the regal power, no man ever had a better oppor­tunity of accomplishing it. But he ne­ver thought of it: all his actions shew that he acted under the immediate autho­rity of God. He, therefore, saw, with­out murmuring, his brother and his bro­ther's children raised to the sacerdotal of­fice. And what adds to the lustre of the action, he himself puts them in pos­session of this dignity, whilst he leaves his own children mixed in the crowd of [Page 43]Levites, without hopes of ever rising to any higher preferment: for by the consti­tution of the priesthood, they were bar­red from ever having any share in the honour, power, or wealth of the priests, and rendered totally incapable of ever enjoying the authority and dignity of the high priest's office. These, Sir, are some of the actions of Moses; and they are such as shew him to have been a per­son of eminent virtue and piety. And, as he was virtuous and pious himself, so he endeavoured to form a virtuous peo­ple, who, by a faithful service paid to the one true God, should give an exam­ple to all the nations of the earth, of a pure and reasonable worship. This Sir, was the sole end of the legislation of Mo­ses, so much superior to all other forms of government; for as the illustrious author of the Spirit of Laws, says, "Besides the common object which all governments have of supporting themselves, each of them has besides a peculiar one." Thus Sparta formed soldiers, Rome conquerors, and Carthage merchants and navigators; but this object of Moses, I am bold to af­firm, [Page 44]was much more noble, and more worthy of a wise legislator, than any of those.

I must farther observe, that the most famous legislators made it a rule not to change any thing in the ancient supersti­tions, but to leave the people at full li­berty to prostitute their adoration to infe­rior gods, to the stars, the elements, plants, reptiles, &c. While Moses consi­dered it as a most important obligation, to instruct his nation in its duty towards the great Creator and governor of the world. To make them sensible of his power, goodness, justice and providence; and to teach them how to deserve an happy existence under his almighty pro­tection, by an exact observance of his laws. Do you not think, Sir, that a con­duct like this, deserves encomiums even in a philosophical light?

Moreover, what legislator ever spoke of the supreme being to his people, as Moses did to the Hebrews? he gives them the most sublime ideas of him, and shews them the most manifest proofs of his particular providence, &c. And [Page 45]which leads me to take notice of an ob­servation that I have made elswhere^*, in support of the truth of the divine dis­pensation of Moses—It is as follows.—The modern philosophers, such as Voltaire, &c. take a pride in representing the Jews as an ignorant, stupid, and bar­barous nation, compared with the more polished nations of antiquity. Let us now for a moment grant the truth of their assertion, it of course will follow that, from a people so ignorant, stupid, and unpolished, as they are represented to be, we naturally should not expect to find sentiments and doctrines, far superior to any thing of the kind that we find among the most improved nations.

Now, it is well known that the anti­ent, nations the Egyptians, the Babylo­nians, the Assyrians, the Tyrians, &c. were the neighbours of the Jews, and com­pletely surrounded them. These, were all sunk into the most gross and stupid idolatry: for they worshiped not only the sun, moon, and stars: which they sup­posed [Page 46]to be animated, and on whose in­fluence they imagined their good and bad fortunes depended; but death men, heroes, &c. Jupiter, Venus, Adonis, &c. as also animals, insects, and even onions. It therefore is requisite to enquire, how the Jews thus surrounded by these nati­tions, became possessed of such just and sublime conceptions, with respect to the Deity; and the most exalated ideas of his pure UNITY, as inculcated in the writings of Moses; and where could they have learned such rational worship? A worship confined to one invisible, Omnipo­tent, Omniscient, and Omnipresent, being; the maker and governor of all things, visible and invisible, from whom the sun; moon, stars, and every thing else derived their existence, and in whose power it is to dispose of them as he pleases. It is clear they could not have learned it from these nations, nor any other; be­cause their religion was so essentially different from that of any other nation in the ancient world: for they all, with­out exception, practised the most impure, as well as the most cruel rites in ho­nour [Page 47]of their Gods; and their public festivals in general, were scenes of riot and debauchery.

Many of their ceremonies were most horribly barbarous. Their priests cut and mangled themselves, in a most horrid manner, and practised the most dreadful mortifications in the course of their wor­ship. Innocent children were not spared by their parents, who madly devoted them to the most cruel death; that of burning them alive, either to appease the wrath, or secure the favour of their gods. A remarkable instance of which, we have in the life of Themistocles, the renowned Admiral of the Athenians, as related by Plutarch. "When Themistocles was about to sacrifice upon the Admiral galley, there were three very beautiful captives brought to him, well dressed and gloriously adorned with rich vests of gold, said to be the children of Autarctus and Sandauce, sister to Xerxes. As soon as the prophet Euphrantides saw them, and observed that at the same time the fire blazed out from the offerings, and cast forth a more than ordinary bright flame, and that one sneezed [Page 48]to the right, which portended a fortunate event, he took Themistocles by the hand, and ordered that the three children should be consecrated and purified for sacrifice, and offered up as a vow for victory to Bacchus Omastes, or the Devourer; for hereby the Greeks should not only save themselves, but also obtain victory.— Themistocles was stariled at a prophecy that carried so much cruelty and inhuma­nity in it; but the populace, according to their manner in all pressing difficulties, trusting more to any absurd and extrava­gant methods of appeasing the Deity, than to such as are reasonable, with one voice invoked Bacchus, and bringing the cap­tives to his altar compelled him to perform the sacrifice, as the prophet had com­manded."

They also practised many shocking in­dencies, not proper to be recited; wo­men, in other respects chaste, were taught that prostitution (in which the choice of a partner was not thought of, as being totally excluded) was a necessary made of recemmending themselves to the [...] and protection of their deities. This be­ing [Page 49]the case, of which, we have the most unexceptionable evidence of both Greeks and Romans: and as every effect must have an adequate cause, I wish that you, or any other of the modern philosophers, would be pleased to inform me, how you, or they, can account for the phenomena of a little Jewish horde, as Voltaire de­lights to call them, being thus possessed of the true knowledge of the one living and eternal God, his providence, &c. while the learned, polished, and civil­ized nations, were sunk in the most gross, barbarous, and stupid Idolatry, unless they had received the knowledge thereof by divine revelation. I shall farther shew from the whole tenor of the Mosaical dispensation, in particular from the pre­cepts of the land &c. that these instituti­ons could be none other than divine.

Of all vices (as one of my learned bre­thren says^*,) the most hurtful to society, of all wrongs the most irreparable, of all [Page 50]crimes the blackest, is certainly calumny: for as a great poet says,^*

And of this you have bestowed not a a little on Moses; whom you describe as^† "the wretch that first began and carried on wars on the score, or on the pretence of religion;" &c. And of which you say, you shall state but one instance: which is that of the Midianites. You say,^‡ "When the Jewish army returned from one of their plundering and murdering excursions, the account goes on as follows, Numbers, chap. xxxi. ver. 13. "And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp; and Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came [Page 51]from the battle; and Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? Behold, these caused the children of Is­rael, through the counsel of Balaam to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. Now, therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known a man by lying with him; but all the women-children that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

This is the text: and on which you comment as follows.^* "Among the de­testable villains that in any period of the world have disgraced the name of man, it is impossible to find a greater than Moses, if this account be true. Here is an order to butcher the boys, to massacre the mo­thers, and debauch the daughters." Let us now sir, consider this heinous charge, which with all the abuse that you are master of, you have exhibited against Moses: in order to which, we must take [Page 52]notice of the cause of this war; and which we shall find to be not a "plundering and murdering excursion," but undertaken at the express command of God, to avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites, for what they had suffered through their seduction; and also for God's vengeance against them, for the crime of idolatry which they had caused Israel to commit against him: for both these are mentioned in ver. 2 and 3. "Avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites, &c.—And avenge the Lord of Midian." For by the diabolical scheme of the Midianites prosti­tuting their women, the children of Is­rael, were seduced to commit idolatry: for which crime, twenty four thousand of them were cut off. They therefore were commanded to make war upon them: and the astonishing success of the expedition, plainly shewed, that it was undertaken and conducted under the immediate go­vernment of God: for though the Jewish army consisted of but twelve thousand men, yet did they not lose one single man, in fighting against the host of Midian; and which made so great an impression on the [Page 53]minds of the captains of the host, (of which you take no manner of notice, though if the one part be true, the other must be equally so) that they offered an oblation to the Lord, for his gracious in­terposition in their behalf.

When this army returned thus victori­ous, Moses and the princes of the congre­gation went to out to meet it; and Moses observing the women captives was wroth with the officers; and in a tone of sur­prise, asked, "Have ye saved all the wo­men alive?" For the officers of the army were fully convinced that, according to the rules of war, none were to be put to death, but those that opposed them; and therefore, women and children were ex­cepted; as we find Moses himself had laid it down as rule for the nation, when ma­king war against any other nations, than the Canaanites: Deut. xx. 10. "When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight a­gainst, &c.—And if it will make no peace with thee, &c.—Thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. But the women, and the little ones, and [Page 54]the cattle, &c. shalt thou take for a spoil to thyself." The officers therefore, flew all the males in Midian, and took the women, and the little ones captive. But Moses tells them, that here the case was far different; for, "Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor," These women were the principal actors in this abominable and attrocious crime; for by their prostituting themselves, they se­duced Israel, and drew them to the im­pure worship of their idol god Baal-peor; "and thus there was a plague among the congregation." It therefore, is but jus­tice, that they should be punished in an exemplary manner; as also to prevent their ever again alluring the nation to the love of licentious pleasures, and the prac­tice of idolatry. The young males were ordered to be put to death, (as Abarbanal observes) to prevent the mischief that might ensue from their being spared; by becoming as "pricks in their eyes; and thorns in their sides," either by attempt­ing to avenge what they would esteem [Page 55]their country's wrongs, or by leading the nation into idolatry. But the young mai­dens who had done no injury to the na­tion; and being as yet unpolluted with the abominable and atrocious crimes of their mothers, were not likely to injure thein, were permitted to live, to be em­ployed in domestic uses in their families, or given as wives to their men servants, as will be shewn hereafter. This is the real state of the matter. But, you, sir, without any regard to truth or decency, assert,^* that "it appears from the 35th verse of this chapter, that the number of women-children consigned to debauchery by the order of Moses, was thirty-two thousand." But whence, sir, does this appear? is it to be found in the words of Moses? Certainly not. Prove it then, sir, it is incumbent on you to prove it. Prove this, I say, and I will never more defend Moses; but will acknowledge him to be that detestable villain and horrid monster that you pronounce him to be. Prove this, and I will then acknowledge the [Page 56]Old testament to be what you have called it, "a work of lies, blasphemy, and wickedness; a bad book; the worst of books;" any thing, whatever you please. Once more, I say, prove this, or I must tell you plainly (excuse my freedom) that you are not only a base calumniator, but the basest of calumniators, thus to misre­present God's proceedings in such a bare­faced manner; and which even your pre­decessor, Voltaire, and the other infidel critics, were not hardy enough to do: for they only objected to the great number of girls that could be found in a country of the extent that Midian was of. But not a word, did they presume to say, a­bout the order of Moses for debauching the women children: No sir, they knew better; they knew that they could be easily detected in making such an asser­tion; for they knew that Moses was so far from ordering any such thing, that his laws did not even permit it: this is clear from Deut. xxi. 10—14. where it is or­dered that a man shall not even marry a captive, without several previous formali­ties: and if he afterwards did not like [Page 57]her, he was obliged to let her go free; and durst not by any means dispose of her, "because he had humbled her."^* All which, shews the falsity of what you have advanced so injurious to the character of Moses; and which must now recoil on your own head.

I Shall now proceed to take notice of your objections to the Books of Moses themselves; and shall shew, by their in­ternal evidence, that they are justly enti­tled to the appellation of being the word of God.

To begin with the book of Genesis. You observe,^* "Take away from Genesis the belief that Moses was the author, on which only the strange belief that it is the word of God has stood, and there remains nothing of Genesis, but an anonymous book of stories, fables, and traditionary or invented absurdities, or of downright lies." This, sir, is the polite language which you make use of, in speaking of the book of Genesis; a book that teaches us the origin of the world, the genealo­gies of our first parents, the settlements [Page 59]of ancient nations, and the rise of arts. Concerning these things, I am free to assert, that antiquity cannot supply us with more veritable and precious monu­ments than is contained in this, and the other books of Moses. For as the authors of the ancient universal history observe,^* Moses is the only authentic writer of what happened before, and for several ages after the flood. He is by universal consent allowed to be the most ancient historian now extant: as it is certain, that his history was composed, not only before all the histories, but even before the fables of the Greeks. For there is nothing contained in them relating to the time be­fore the deluge, that has any appearance of truth:^† of this, every discerning mind will be fully convinced, on comparing the fabulous histories of Sanchoniatho, Ma­netho, Berosus,^‡ Herodotus, and Dio­dorus Siculus, with that of Moses.

[Page 60] His philosophy also, is not that barren and fruitless one, whose subtility evaporates [Page 61]in empty reasonings, and whose powers spend themselves in discoveries of no use to the happiness of men: it is not that disastrous philosophy, which, with an axe in its hand, and a veil over its eyes, throws down, overturns, and destroys every thing, and builds up nothing: which in its impious phrenzy, makes mat­ter its God; and which distinguishes man from beast only by his shape. No Sir, it is the wise philosophy of a good man, who wishes to render his fellow crea­tures happy: for Moses begins his histo­ry, with informing us, that there is a God, and that he created the world, and all that is therein. This was the grand fundamental principle, to bring men to the knowledge and worship of him that made them: for it is manifest to demon­stration, that if man does but give himself time to reflect, that God made him, and gave him hands to feel, legs to walk, &c. and endowed him with powers and rea­soning faculties, far beyond that of the brute creation; he will naturally love and reverence that great and awful being, that [Page 62]can mould him as he pleases. The know­ledge of this sublime truth, effectually destroys all those false notions entertain­ed by certain philosophers, of the eterni­ty of matter, and a fortuitous concourse of Atoms. It lays the axe to the root, and at once annihilates that foolish, ab­surd, and impious tenet: and which is a demonstration that the philosophy of Moses, was most beneficially conducive to to the happiness of mankind.

He is also to be admired as an historian; for, as a learned christian^* observes, "Whatever defects may be noted in his history upon the whole, when compared with the more regular and more laboured productions of the polished historians of Greece and Rome; yet in many parts of it he has given evident marks of superior-abilities as an historian. The history of Joseph, for instance, is an example of simple, noble, elegant, interesting, pathe­tic narration: of a justness, neatness, and perspicuity of historic composition; to which nothing equal, or in any degree [Page 63]comparable, can be produced from He­rodotus or Xenophon, Sallust or Livy."

As an orator, his exhortations in the book of Deuteronomy, carry with them a force, a spirit, and an elegance, equal at least, (considering the subject) to anything ever penned.

As a poet, his beatiful ode, recorded in Exodus, is superior to any thing of the kind: but his prophetic poem in Deute­ronomy, is not to be equalled. It con­tains six parts, as I have shewn in ano­ther^* place. The first part consists of the first five verses, and is a prefactory in­troduction to the poem: The second part contains nine verses; the subject of which is the kindness and beneficence of the Supreme Being towards Israel: The third part consists of the next four verses, in which he describes the sin and wicked­ness of the nation: The fourth part con­sists of the next seven verses, in which he recounts the afflictions with which GOD would punish them for their disobedience: The fifth part contains the next eight [Page 64]verses, wherein he describes the final do struction, which the Supreme Being might have been induced to have brought upon them for their enormous crimes, had it not been for one particular reason, and which he inimitably describes: The sixth and last part contains the last ten verses of the poem, in which he rehearses the consolation of Israel, and the ven­geance which GOD will take on their enemies.

And I cannot forbear observing in proof of the prophetic inspiration of this poem, that the first five parts of it, have been fully accomplished, viz. The kindness and beneficence of the Supreme Being towards Israel, in giving them possession of the holy land, and their prosperity under David and Solomon: their sins of idolatry, &c. their captivity, and the severe punish­ments that followed, and their preservation as a distinct nation to this very day, notwithstanding all their sufferings, and which undoubtedly, is one of the most wonderful things in the world, as (shewn at large in my Dissertations on the Pro­phecies vol. Ist. p. 17, &c.) whence, I pre­sume [Page 65]to think, that the completion of the first five parts, may be considered as a pledge and earnest of the accomplishment of the sixth, which mentions the redemp­tion of the nation, &c. And it is very re­markable, that the prophet Jeremiah hath clearly evinced the truth of this position, in the following words,^* which pro­duces as an argument, in support of what he had delivered as a prophecy, foretell­ing the future restoration of the nation: "For thus saith the Lord, like as I have brought all this great evil upon this peo­ple, so will I bring upon them all the good that I have promised them." A stronger proof than what is contained in these words of the prophet, in support of the spirit of prophecy, cannot be required; for the accomplishment of the evils pre­dicted, is a sure pledge of the completion of the good promised: and therefore, as it is allowed on all hands, that the first five parts of this poem, hath been fulfilled in every particular fact, it consequently [Page 66]is manifest, that not the least doubt ought to be entertained of the full accomplish­ment of the last part. And which is a demonstrable proof of the divine mission of Moses.

I SHALL, now proceed to the other books of Moses; viz. Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. These, sir, contain our laws, Religions and Moral; Civil, Political, and Ritual; (though I do not mean to treat of them all thus distinctly arranged; but only of a few of them as they occur to illustrate the sub­ject we are treating of) from all which I hope to prove, to the satisfaction of every candid and liberal mind, that these laws were every way worthy of God, who was pleased to bestow them by the hands of his servant Moses, on this people Is­rael.

There is one God, says the Penta­teuch, and but One. This God alone deserves to be worshipped. He is the Supreme Being, the necessary origin of all beings; no other is comparable to [Page 68]him. He is a pure spirit, immense and infinite; he cannot be represented by any bodily shape. It is he that created the universe by his power, and governs it by his wisdom. He views all our actions; nothing can escape his watchful eye; and with an equitable hand he rewards and punishes us according to our deserts.

All this we learn from those books; for the belief of the existence of God, is founded on the first great commandment, I am the Lord thy God. ^*

That he is One, we are taught from Deut. vi. 6. Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is own.

That he alone is to be worshipped, is contained in the second and third com­mandments, Thou shalt have no other Gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto that any graven image, &c. Thou shalt not been down thyself to them, nor serve them, &c.

That he cannot be represented by any bodily shape, we are taught from Deut. iv. 15. For ye saw no similitude on the [Page 69]day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb. This doctrine was likewise strongly incul­cated by the prophet Isaiah^*, who says, "To whom therefore will ye liken God? and what is the form of resemblance that ye will compare with him? Again^†, To whom will ye liken me? and to whom shall I be equalled? saith the holy one."

That God knoweth all the thoughts and actions of mankind; and is not so in dif­ferent and unconcerned about them, as the unbelievers think; who say, "the Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsak­en the earth," (Fzek. viii. 12?) But on the contrary, he observes, and takes cog­nizance of all our actions: this we are taught from Gen. vi. 3. "And God save that the wickedness of man (was) great in the earth." See also Gen. xviii. 20, besides several other parts of these books.

That God rewards and punishes with an equitable hand, we are taught in Exod. xxxii. 32, 33. "Yet now, if thou wilt forgive their sin: and if not, blot me, I [Page 70]pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast written, And the Lord said unto Mo­ses, whosoever have sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book."

We are also taught, that although a temple was commanded to be built; mi­nisters appointed for its service, sacrifices and offerings instituted; yet all this is nothing in his eyes, if the sentiments of the heart do not give it life. The wor­ship that he requires above all things, and before every thing, is the acknowledg­ment of our entire dependance on him, and of his supreme dominion; thankful­ness for his benefits; trust in his mercy, reverence, and love. Thus he says,^* "And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength. And now^† Israel, what doth the Lord thy God re­quire of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul. To keep the commandments of the Lord, and [Page 71]the statutes which I command thee this day for thy good." See also chap. xi. ver. 13, &c. where these true and sublime ideas are also strongly inculcated; and which so eminently distinguish the Jewish from all ancient legislators; and plainly shew that the doctrines, which recommend such a pure worship, can be none other than divine; as being every way worthy of God.

Let us now examine the morality taught in these books, what beauty and purity do we find in this morality! There is scarcely a vice which it doth not con­demn. It is not enough that evil actions are forbidden, even desires are prohibit­ed, "Thou shall not desire^*. Thou shalt not covet^† In inculcating this mo­rality, Moses not only requires perfect equity, untainted probity, justice, faith­fulness, and the most exact honesty; but he would also have us be humane, com­passionate, and charitable: ever ready to do unto others as we should wish they would do unto us, as he says^‡, "But [Page 72]thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."

This love is also to be extended to the stranger; "And if a stranger sojourn with you in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you, shall be unto you as one born amongst you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of E­gypt.^* Love ye therefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of E­gypt."^† Thus you may perceive that this brotherly love and charity was not confined to those that were Jews born; as every other person might share in them: for it is, and ever was, a fixed law amongst us, to admit into our religion and com­monwealth, all those that were willing to submit to our laws and customs; and who after submitting to the right of circumci­sion, and performing ablution, were in­corporated among the nation, and became as one of them: for thus the law speaks of the stranger. "Let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that [Page 73]is born in the land; for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof. One law shall be to him that is home born, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you^*. Now Sir, is not this law far more humane than that exclusion of strangers, ordained by so many other legislators^†?

Let us now consider the humane and charitable laws, ordained for the relief of the poor, the widow and the father­less: of the servants and slaves: and we shall presently perceive how superior they were to all the laws of the ancient polish­ed nations.

Of the poor.

"And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee, then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger or a sojourner, that he may live with thee. Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God, that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase. I am [Page 74]the LORD your God, which brought you forth out of the land of Egypt, to give you the land of Canaan, and to be your God^*.—If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren, within any of thy gates, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not har­den thy heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother. But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth^†.—If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as a usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury. If thou at all take thy neigh­bour's raiment to pledge, thou shalt deli­ver it to him by that the sun goeth down, for that is his covering only, it is his rai­ment for his skin: wherein shall he sleep? And it shall come to pass, when he crieth unto me, that I will hear: for I am gra­cious^‡. When thou dost lend thy bro­ther any thing, thou shalt not go into his house to fetch his pledge. Thou shalt [Page 75]stand abroad, and the man to whom thou dost lend shalt bring out the pledge abroad unto thee. And if the man be poor, thou shalt not sleep with his pledge. In any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his own raiment, and bless thee: and it shall be righteousness unto thee before the LORD thy God^*."

Of the widow and fatherless.

"Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fa­therless child. If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me, I will surely hear their cry: And my wrath shall wax hot; and I will kill you with the sword: and your wives shall be widows; and your children fatherless^†."

Of hired servants.

"Thou shalt not oppress an hired ser­vant that is poor and needy, whether he be of thy brethren, or of thy strangers that are in thy land within thy gates. On his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it, for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it: lest he [Page 76]cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee^*."

Of a purchased servant.

"If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing."^† If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: If he were married, then his wife shall go out with^‡ him. If his mas­ter have given him a wife,^§ and she have borne him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out by himself. If thy bro­ther an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew wo­man [Page 77]be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee. And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away emp­ty: Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy wine press: of that wherewith the Lord thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him. And thou shalt re­member that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the Lord thy God redeemed thee: therefore, I command this thing to day."^* &c. besides, a num­ber of other passages of the like import.

Of slaves.

"And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand, he shall surely be punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his money^†.—And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish, he shall let him go free for [Page 78]his eye's sake. And if he smite out his man-servant's tooth, or his maid-servant's tooth, he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake^*."

Before I proceed, it is necessary to in­form you, that the servants here men­tioned, are not Hebrew servants, (called purchased servants) but slaves, bought from among the Gentiles, or captives taken in war; as also of those strangers that sojourned among them; agreeable to the following command, "Both thy bond-men and thy bond-maids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bond-men and bond maids. More­over, of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy^†," &c. which when bought became their proper goods, and continued with them as their lands did; for an inherit­ance to them and their children after them^‡. And it is of these latter, that the law is thus tender; for the former, were [Page 79]not to go free for the fake of an eye or a or a tooth^*: but if the master shall thus injure them, they were entitled to the same reparation as the other Hebrews. And, now Sir, if you please to review all the laws of the ancient nations, I am confident, you will not be able to find any thing in them, that can equal the hu­manity and tender care of the law of Mo­ses, not only for the poor, the widow and the orphan, but for the slave also: for al­most all the ancient governments aban­doned, without exception, the slaves of both sexes to the lust and brutality of their masters.^† If you are acquainted [Page 80]with history, you cannot be ignorant to what excesses^* this permission gave birth, even amongst nations that are proposed to us as models of civilised and wise govern­ments.

At Lacedemon, let slaves be treated in [Page 81]the cruellest manner whatsoever, they yet could claim no protection from the laws. If any one looked above his condition, by an elegant figure, he was condemned to die and his master was fined,^* in order that he might by severity prevent his other slaves from offending hereafter the eyes of the citizens by their outward accom­plishments.

The Spartans, being authorized by such laws, used to fall upon the Helots, whilst they were at work in the fields, and with­out mercy would destroy the ablest men amongst them; and this for mere exer­cise, and lest these slaves should increase too much. This was the ambuscade, mentioned by Aristotle, as one of the institutions of Lycurgus^†." "The thing" [Page 82]as Plutarch says^*, "was this; Those who had the care of the young men, dis­patched from time to time some of the ablest of them into the country at ran­dom, armed only with their daggers, and taking a little necessary provision with them: these in the day-time hid themselves in the thickets and clefts, and there lay close, but in the night they is­sued out into the high-ways and killed all the Ilotes they could light upon; some­times they set upon them by day, as they were at work in the fields, and murder­ed the ablest and stoutest of them in cold blood, as Thucydides also, in his history of the Peloponnesian war, relates, where he tells us, that such of them as the Lace­daemonians had singled out for their va­lour, were crowned by proclamation, as persons enfranchised (for their good ser­vices;) and went about to all the temples in token of freedom; but that soon after they all disappeared on a sudden, being about the number of two thousand; and no man neither then nor since could give [Page 83]an account how they came by their deaths. And Aristotle particularly says, that the Ephori, so soon as they were en­tered into their office, used to declare war against them, that they might be massacred with a pretence of Law."

And Rome still more barbarous, calm­ly viewed her great men slaughter their slaves, without the least cause of com­plaint, in order to throw their bodies into their fish ponds to make their lam­preys more delicious, by such nourish­ment. Even under the eyes of the Ma­gistrates, thousands of these unhappy creatures expired in the amphitheatre, for the amusement of a fierce and cruel people, and some festival days caused more human blood to flow in the empire, than many days of battle.

But the laws of Moses did not give such tyrannical power to masters: on the con­trary, they tenderly watched over the lives and modesty of the slaves, as is plain from the foregoing extract from these laws; and which no doubt, was the rea­son that our ancestors were almost the only [Page 84]ancient^* people, among whom there was not any of those rebellions of the slaves, which often brought so many other nations to the brink of ruin,^†

From the extracts of our laws above mentioned, you may also perceive the moderation we were enjoined to use to­wards our debtors^‡; and which I would recommend you to compare with the hor­rid law of the twelve tables, which per­mitted the creditors to load the debtors with chains; and after some market days, to out them in pieces, and to share amongst them their bloody limbs, or to sell them to strangers!

This humanity, Sir, was also extended [Page 85]even to the delinquent, as is plain from the following text. "And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, accor­ding to his fault, by a certain number. Forty stripes he may give him, and not exceed: lest if he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile in' thy sight^*." By this wise and humane law, so different from that of all other nations, the punishment of the culprit, was not left to the arbitrary will of the judge, who might order his hundreds or thousands of lashes; No Sir, the number was re­stricted to forty stripes: and that they might not exceed the number thus limit­ted by the^† law, or doctors ordained, [Page 86]that no more than thirty nine stripes should be given^*.

But this is not all, our laws every where order us to treat even the brute creation with humanity. "And whether it be cow or ewe, ye shall not kill it and her young both in one day^†. ‘Thou shalt not take the dam with the young^‡." [Page 87]Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn*.’ The law also commanded us to let the beast rest on the sabbath. From all which, it is manifest, that the more you study the laws of Moses, the more instances you will find in them of gentleness and humanity: and the more they are compared with ancient legislatures, the more a man will be convinced of their excellence.

I shall now take notice of some of the precepts of the land, which may be pro­perly termed a part of the Political laws of Moses. With these, several Festivals, (which are a part of the Ritual law) are closely connected: and therefore, it is proper to consider them conjointly. And for the better understanding of which, it is nécessary that we go back to the call of Abraham; when we shall plainly see the propriety of the nation's being cal­led God's chosen people▪ This will ap­pear manifest from the purpose for which they were chosen: which was to hand down the unity, and worship of the one only God, the creator of heaven and earth. This purpose, by the infinite wisdom of God, hath been fully accom­plished through their means, as will be perceived in the sequel.

Notwithstanding the severe and exem­plary [Page 84]punishment, with which God pun­ished the sins of the old world; and the means which we are naturally to suppose that Noah took to provide for the instruc­tion of the new in the true worship of God: we nevertheless find, that in a ve­ry short time, mankind degenerated again, and advanced apace towards the same state of depravity, that they were in be­fore the flood: especially in regard to false worship, God therefore, called Abraham, who wherever he went^*, plain­ly shewed them the vanity of worship­ping the creature instead of the creator; and boldly asserted his supremacy, in de­fiance of all opposition^†. For his faith and righteousness, God made choice of him and his posterity, to hand down the knowledge of his unity, and preserve the principles of the true religion uncorrupt­ed, amidst the Idolatrous fictition of a [Page 90]false theology. It was for this purpose that God selected the family of Araham from among all nations, and sealed them with his coyenant*, to be the repository of the sacred oracles: that they might convey them to posterity in their original purity. And that this might be fully ac­complished, God promised Abraham the land of Canaan for an inheritance for his posterity: though before that time should arrive, they would be sorely afflicted in captivity; from which however, he would redeem them; and severely punish their oppressors; and thus make them fully sensible, that he alone was God; and governed the world by his particular pro­vidence. And, as Egypt might justly be considered as the very sink of false wor­ship; the contaminated fountain, whence flowed idolatry, the arts of magic and divination; and the institutions of super­stitions and obscene rites; God was pleased to make it the scene of the great [...] [Page 91]was the necessity of the miracles perform­ed by Moses: for the sole end and pur­pose of these miracles was, to convince all—the Israeltes*, the Egyptians, and the rest of the nations, that the false dei­ties worshipped by them, were nought but vanity, that could not profit: for that the Lord alone was the true God, and governor of the world; and that there was none else besides.

Now the most rational method that could have been taken to reclaim all those from their errors, and induce them to em­brace the truth, was to make it appear plain and evident to their understandings, that things were, in fact, otherwise than they apprehended. For the Egyptians falsely imagined that those illustrious hea­venly bodies, the sun, moon and stars, as also the elements, were the distributors of blessings and comforts: for as they ob­served the course of things to be constant­ly regulated, and the blessings of life to [...] and a­gency [Page 92]of these bodies, they, consequent­ly, were led to believe them to be the on­ly gods that governed the world. This being the case, let us now consider how their fatal mistake was to be removed, and they set right in this point:—Was it not by convincing them that these bodies had no other powers or qualities than what they derived from their great Crea­tor, whose instruments they were, em­ployed by him to carry on the purposes of his providence? And what more ra­tional method could God have made use of to form this conviction, than that of empowering his messenger to alter or sus­pend the qualities of these bodies, and make them operate by his bare command, in direct opposition to their ordinary course? This was appealing to their own notions, and making them sensible, in their own way, that the Lord alone was the creator and governor of the world, and that all visible beings were but so ma­ny subordinate agents, working by his power, and under his directions: and whose powers he can suspend whenever he pleases: consequently, he alone was [Page 93]entitled to the worship and obedience of men, as he only could reward or punish them.

That we may place this matter in a clear light, it will be necessary to take a parti­cular view of the progress and conduct of the whole proceeding.

In the first place then, God, by a message in his own name, required the Egyptian king to release his people^*. "Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, let my people go that they may hold a feast unto me in the wilderness." By Pha­raoh's answer to this message, it is plain, that he disclaimed all knowledge of the God of Israel, and absolutely refused to yield any obedience to him: thus he says^†, "Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the Lord, neither will I let Israel go. I worship my own gods, and none other." This was then the proper time to con­vince him, and all the Egyptians of their folly, or to punish them for their wicked­ness, if they persisted therein. But God [Page 94]foreseeing by his omniscience what the consequence would be, and being, as it were, unwilling to enter on the methods of severity, commanded his servants to go again to Pharaoh, and repeat the de­mand of his dismissing the Israelites. On this second application, when the king required them^* to exhibit some miracle, as a proof that they were not magicians, but the messengers of God, (as Abarba­nal observes) "Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh, and before his servants, and it became a serpent." Hereupon the magicians were called to confront him; and they having cast down every man his rod, they, in like manner, became ser­pents. Thus far, then, both parties ex­hibited equal signs of power; but the su­periority of God's messengers soon ap­peared; for "Aaron's rod swallowed up their rods."

[Page 95] But this miracle making no impression on the mind of Pharaoh, God proceeded by other miracles to shew his omnipotent power, in opposition to their false deities; by asslicting them with ten plagues; and which were wrought in the four elements; as well as in the heavenly bodies: for as Abarbanal observes, some were transact­ed in grosser elements of earth and water; as the turning the waters into blood, and the plague of frogs: both these were in the element of water. The next three were produced from the earth: and the remainder were performed in the lighter elements of air and fire; as also by the suspension of the light and emanation of the heavenly luminaries, the sun, moon, and stars, when he covered the land of Egypt with thick darkness for three days. These miracles were admirably calculated to prove the falsity of their ideas concerning their deities; as well as to punish them for their sins, of idolatry &c. for as they highly venerated the waters of the Nile, as being the fruitful source of their choicest blessings; inso­much that in their barbarously superstiti­ous [Page 96]devotions to this river, they stained its current with human sacrifices^*. And al­so thre [...] the males of the children of Israel therein: the turning its water into blood, was a just and suitable punishment for such bloody rites and cruelties: by thus depriving them of its bounty, in render­ing its water, which was their common drink, unfit to be drank; and destroying its fish, so that they could not eat them.

In like manner did all the other mira­cles tend to convince them of his omnipo­tent power over their false deities, and his particular providence in the govern­ment of the world, and the protection of those that serve him. This is manifest by the distinction made between the children of Israel in the land of Goshen, and the the Egyptians, during the whole progress of these plagues^†. But the last of these [Page 97]miracles, viz. the death of the first born, was such a manifest proof of his power and sovereignty, and a demonstration of his taking particular cognizance of human transactions, and sooner or later rewarding every man according to his works, as could not be denied. For, as he at first threat­ened,^* that if they would not let his first born Israel go, and serve him, he would slay their first born: the accomplishment of that threat made so great an impression on Pharaoh and all his people, that they not only gave them leave to go, but forc­ed them to depart.

On this destruction of the first born of the Egyptians, was instituted the ceremo­ny of the redemption of the first born of the Hebrews^†; as was also the passover, &c. in order to fix lasting traces on their minds, of the wonders which God had worked for them: to perpetuate from ge­neration to generation the memory of these great events; and to evidence the truth of them to the whole earth, even [Page 98]down to our own times; for the ceremo­ny of the passover, and the other festi­vals, as well as the redemption of the first born, are all strictly observed through­out the nation, at this very day; as proofs of the miracles performed for them at their deliverance from Egypt.

The passover, therefore, as well as the redemption of the first born, which were instituted immediately in commemoration of the redemption from Egypt, are, in themselves, a clear evidence and demon­stration of that event, as related by DI­VINE REVELATION; more especially, as a great number of the other precepts con­tained in the Mosaical laws are founded^* on the said redemption: and they are continually reminded^† of their subjection in Egypt, and the degraded state of bon­dage, that they were there held in: it, therefore would be highly absurd to [Page 99]conceive it possible, that three or four millions of people, could suffer themselves to be imposed on in such a barefaced man­ner, by being continually told of the de­graded state that they had been in; and unanimously agreeing to accept of an in­stitution said to be founded on a miracu­lous deliverance wrought for them, if, in fact, no such deliverance had ever taken place. A position like this, Sir, surely no deist, freethinker, or sceptic, will be hardy enough to advance. Now this in­stitution actually took place at the very time of their departure from Egypt, and hath continued to this day: so that it is impossible to doubt the truth of it. In­deed, the miracles of Moses bear such evident marks^* of truth, being perform­ed [Page 100]in so public a manner, and for such wise purposes; and on the notoriety of which, several festivals and other pre­cepts were instituted, and immediately took place, and continue in full force to this hour; that it really is astonishing how any rational person can doubt their au­thenticity. It must farther be observed, in support of what I have advanced, that God himself when he came to give them the law, appealed to the truth of those things of which they were eye witnesses^*, and in which, as I may say, parties con­cerned: he, therefore, does not say, I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHO MADE HEAVEN AND EARTH: for of that, they were not eye witnesses; consequently, they could neither affirm, or deny the same: But he says, I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt. Of this transaction, and the miracles performed both antecedent and subsequent to their departure from thence, [Page 101]they were all living witnesses: it being but fifty days since their departure, and forty three since the Egyptians were drowned in the sea, when they went over dry shod. It therefore, is not only improbable, but almost impossible to imagine, that a whole nation could be thus imposed upon. Hence, it neces­sarily follows, that as the precepts of the law, are founded on the redemption, and the miracles which accompanied it; and which were performed in the presence of those to whom these precepts were given, I say, it necessarily follows that the mi­racles were performed by a divine pow­er; and that the precepts founded there­on, are divine precepts: consequently, we have here a demonstration of divine revelation.

There is an other proof of the divine mis­sion of Moses, that I can by no means omit mentioning; (though in truth it it needs not father confirmation) I mean, God's speaking to Moses face to face, in the presence of six hundred thousand men, besides women and children; as menti­oned [Page 102]Exod. chap. xix. 9. "And the Lord said unto Moses, Lo, I come unto thee in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with thee, and believe thee for ever.

This, Sir, was an especial proof of the divine mission of Moses; and indeed, a greater cannot be required, as Moses himself emphatically expresses^* it; "For ask now of the days that are past, which were before thee, since the day that God created man upon the earth, and (ask) from one end of the heaven unto the other, whether there hath been (any such thing) as this great thing (is), or hath been heard like it? Did (ever) peo­ple hear the voice of God speaking out of the midst of fire, as thou hast heard?" And it was this, that God meant by the expression. "And this (shall be) a sign unto thee, that I have sent thee; when thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain^†."

For this was the essential proof of the [Page 103]divine mission of Moses; because, they not only heard God speak to Moses, but to themselves likewise; and by which they were fully satisfied of the existence of the spirit of prophecy, as we find they ex­pressed themselves^*: "And we have heard his voice out of the midst of the fire: we have seen this day that God doth talk with man, and he liveth."

And what is still a greater proof (if a greater can be) of his divine mission, and that the nation was fully convinced there­of, is, that they, from thenceforward, agreed to receive, as coming from God, whatever he should deliver to them; be­cause, they were then fully satisfied of his mission. Hear their own words. "Now therefore why should we die? for this great fire will consume us. If we continue to hear the voice of the Lord our God we shall die. For who (is there) of all flesh that hath heard the voice of the living God, speaking out of the midst of fire, as we (have) and lived? go thou near, and hear all that [Page 104]the Lord our God shall say, and speak thou unto us all that the Lord our God shall speak unto thee, and we will bear (it), and do ^* (it).

And as it was by such extraordinary means that they were brought to a firm belief in the divine mission of Moses, so hath it never been effaced from the Jew­ish nation: for notwithstanding that they fell into idolatry, and other crimes; yet at no time whatever, did the nation de­ny the divine mission of Moses, or ab­rogate his laws. No, Sir: not the de­struction of our government, and the consequent dispersion of the nation; the persecutions of Heathens and Christians, and the almost universal contempt of all nations, have ever been able to root it out of our hearts. In consequence of this, the laws of Moses have been han­ded down to us, through so many ages and revolutions, ever the same, and ever respectable, whilst nothing remains of so many forms of government of the most renowned nations but the names of the [Page 105]lawgivers affixed to some fragments of their laws. But this is not all; not only the Jews, but two thirds of this habita­ble globe revere these laws and look upon Moses as divinely inspired. What hu­man government ever had the like suc­cess.

Compare this, now sir, with the extra­ordinary method that the great Lycur­gus took to render his laws immortal, and to cause them to be delivered down unchangeable to posterity. "To bring this to pass^*, he called an extraordinary assembly of all the People, he told them that he now thought every thing reason­ably well established, both for the pub­lic happiness, and improving the virtue of each particular; but that there was one thing still behind, and that of the greatest importance, which he thought not fit to impart until he had consulted the oracle: In the mean time his desire was, that they would punctually observe his laws without any the least alteration until his return from Delphi, and then he would [Page 106]do as the God should' direct him. They all consented readily, and prayed him to hasten his voyage; but before he depart­ed he administered an oath to the two kings, the Senate, and then to all the com­mons, that they would inviolably observe his ordinances during his absence. This done, he set fail for Delphi: when he came to the oracle, and had sacrificed to Apollo, he asked him, whether the law he had established were sufficient to make a City virtuous and happy? The Oracle answered, That this laws were excellent, and that the City should continue in the highest renown while it observed the polity of Lycurgus. He took this oracle in writing, and sent it over to Sparta: and then, having sacrificed the second time to Apollo, and taken his leave of his friends, and his son, he resolved that the Spar­tans should never be released from the Oath they had taken, but that there he would put a voluntary end to his life. He therefore made an end of himself by a total abstience from meat." But not­withstanding all this, in about five centu­ries; it was all forgotten; and it most [Page 107]certainly would not have continued so long; but (as M. Dacier observes^*;) that the Spartans for a long time, had no wars but in Peloponnesus. But as soon as their thirst of Empire had inspired them with a design of having naval forces, and en­tertaining foreign Troops; and there was a necessity of foreign money to pay them; then their oath availed no more against that necessity, than if it had been a spider's web; they did not so much as remember any such had ever been taken. Then were the laws of Lycurgus violat­ed with a vengeance, and they were no more thought of than if they had never been.

And now Sir, give me leave to ask you on what principles of philosophy, can you account for this great disparity between the duration and perpetuity of the laws of Moses, and those of Lycurgus: for, this duration, this perpetuity of our laws, with the respect and veneration with which they have been treated for so many ages, and in so many climates, cannot be the [Page 108]effect of chance. And can you account for it by any natural means? No sir: it is impossible! The only solution is, that the one was the work of man; conse­quently fallible; and liable to be annul­led. But the other, is the work of God, and, therefore, not subject to abolition; for as the Psalmist says, "Various are the imaginations in the heart of man: but it is the counsel of the Lord alone that shall stand. The counsel of the Lord shall stand for ever: (and) the purposes of his heart to all generations." Yes, Sir, we here clearly perceive the finger of God: his power and his wisdom shine forth too conspicuously to suffer the least doubt to remain.

The feast of Pentecost, and Taberna­cles, also founded on their redemption: the former, in memory, of the delivery of the law on mount Sinai; which was on the fiftieth day of their departure from Egypt; and the latter, as scripture ex­pressly asserts, to commemorate the good­ness^* of God, in the protection of the [Page 109]Israelites in the wilderness. These three great festivals, viz. Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles, bear evident marks of their divine institution: and strongly in­culcate a divine providence: for they were called festivals of appearance; because, thereon all the males were to appear be­fore the Lord in Jerusalem: as^* it is said, "Three times in a year shall all your males appear before the Lord God, the God of Israel. For I will cast out the nations be­fore thee, and enlarge thy borders: neither shall any man desire thy land, when thou goest up to appear before the Lord thy God, three times in the year. Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the Lord thy God, in the place which he shall choose: in the feast of un­leavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of Tabernacles; and they shall not appear before the Lord empty. Every man shall give as he is able, accord­ing to the blessing of the Lord thy God which he hath given^† thee."

[Page 110] On this institution, I must observe, that in the first place, it strongly inculcates (as do most of the precepts, those of the land especially) a particular providence; for they were to go up to Jerusalem, to re­turn thanks to God for their redemption from Egypt, and for the land which God had given to them, and the blessing he had bestowed on the fruits of the earth, &c. For the Passover was instituted in memory of their going out of Egypt in the month Abib^*; and the feast of weeks for the offering of the first fruits of wheat har­vest^†; and the feast of Tabernacles is called the feast of ingathering, when they had fully got in their harvest: they, therefore, as an acknowledgement for these great benefits, were commanded to offer freewill offerings, and give to the Levite, the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, according to the blessing which the Lord their God had given them: thereby justly attributing every benefit they enjoyed to the bountiful hand of Providence.

[Page 111] Secondly, it clearly proves, that this law could be none other than a divine or­dinance; for on these festivals all the males were commanded to come up from all parts to Jerusalem (as above mention­ed.) Now, this is what no legislator, in his senses, ever dared attempt to do: to leave the land three times a year to the defence of old men, women and children; promising them at the same time that no one should take or desire it. Who ever at­tempted to risk the ruin of his nation in this manner? more especially when it is considered by what kind of neighbours they were surrounded; and who were al­most ever hostile to them. I say, who dared do so? Who dared make such a promise, without running the risk of bring­ing inevitable ruin on the whole nation, but He in whose hand the hearts of kings are as rivers of waters, and who turneth them whithersoever he pleaseth^*? He on­ly, could thus promise to protect their country in their absence, against the in­cursions of their warlike neighbours; and [Page 112]which was actually the case during all the time of their observance of this precept: so that this may be considered as a stand­ing miracle, and a demonstration of the divine origin of the institution of these festivals.

We shall now proceed to speak of those precepts, that are more immediately con­nected with the land; when the divine ori­gin of the Mosaical laws will be farther demonstrated.

All the ancient nations looked upon the distribution of lands as a masterpiece in politice: And give me leave to ask you sir, where they were more wisely distri­buted than by our lawgiver? The insti­tutions of the famous Spartan legislator, so highly extolled by the Greek writers, must in this respect, yield the palm to the Hebrew legislator: for in the distribution appointed by him, every one out of the six hundred thousand men fit for war, that entered the land of Canaan, was to have a portion of ground given to him, sufficient to maintain him and his family in decent affluence.

[Page 113] This inheritance, Moses informed them, was given to them by God; they held it immediately from him, and were to consi­der him as the only Lord of the land. Hence it was, that they were commanded to offer the first fruits to Jehovah; when they were to make confession^* of his good­ness to them, in giving them the promised land, and in bestowing his bountiful bles­sing on it.

They were also commanded to give tithes to the Levites,^† &c. And, although you have been so severe against christian priests, for demanding of tithes, yet, I think, you cannot in reason, have any ob­jection to this institution in the Mosaical law: for, in the first place, as the whole tribe of Levi had no inheritance in the land, and were moreover set apart for the service of God, it was but just that they should have wherewithal to live; God therefore ordered that the other tribes should give them tithes. And, secondly, [Page 114]though the Israelites were commanded to give tithes; yet was it not lawful for the Priest^* or Levite to come and demand it as their right: but only to ask for it as a free gift of the husbandman; (who might give it to whatsoever priest or Levite that he chose) much less had they any power to take it by sorce; or to institute a pro­cess by law against them for non-payment: No, sir, the giving of tithes was a volun­tary act. God had indeed commanded them to give tithes, as an acknowledgement of their holding the land immediately from him; (and which no doubt, every [Page 115]good Israelite would be very willing on that account to do; more especially as they were promised an increased blessing in return) but he by no means author­ised the priests or Levites, to force it from them; or in case of refusal, to har­rass them by law suits, &c. Heace, there was no such quarrels and contentions be­tween the priests and people in the Jew­ish nation, as exists in many others; and which is a demonstration of the divine wisdom in the formation of this institu­tion.

Another thing that was continually to remind them, that they held the land, as the immediate gift of God, was, that the lands thus given to them, were to be abso­lutely unalienable. "The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me." (Levit. xxv. 23.) By this means the estates of the Israclites were so unal­terably fixed, that no family could ruin itself, or grow too rich and powerful: for the law ordained, that all estates sold, should return to its first owners, or their [Page 116]heirs, at the year of the Jubilee. Thus, the lands passed from the fathers to the children, and were to remain forever in the same tribe^* and family. This law was the effect of deep and wise policy. It perpetuated all the advantages of the first distribution; and by confining the citizen to his original spot, endeared it to him; and excited in him a love of in­dustry and frugality. It repressed ava­rice, and restrained the ambitious schemes of great landholders: It prevented the oppression of the poor, and took away all cause of jealousy, discontent, faction, and all those evils which other common wealths vainly endeavoured to remedy by their agrarian laws.

But the greatest proof of a divine pro­vidence was inculcated by the law, that ordained the observance of the Sabbati­cal year, and year of Jubilee. On these years, there was to be a total cessation [Page 117]from all manner of agriculture. "But^* in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land, a sabbath for the LORD: thou shalt neither sow thy field nor prune thy vineyard. That which groweth of its own accord of thy harvest, thou shalt not reap, neither gather the grapes of thy vine undressed:—A Jubi­lee shall that siftieth year be unto you: ye shall not sow, neither reap that which groweth of itself in it^†, &c." They were not only forbidden to fow, but were also prohibited from gathering the spontane­ous product of the sields and fruit trees, but all was to be in common; for the poor and the beasts of the field^‡, &c.

On the sabbatical year, there was also to be a full discharge of all money lent to the poor; "At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. And this is the manner of the release; every ereditor that lendeth ought unto his neigh­bour, shall release it, he shall not exact [Page 118] it of his neighbour, or his brother, be­cause it is called the Lord's release."^* This was a most humane and benevolent law, in regard to the poor debtors, not to be equalled in any legislature.

The Jubilee year was distinguished from the sabbatical year, by the sollow­ing ordinances. First, it was a year of general release of purchased servants. Even such as at the end of their six years services had voluntarily refused to accept of their freedom, and in consequence had their ears bored^† in token of perpetual servitude, were nevertheless set free at the Jubilee; for in the fiftieth year, they were to "proclaim liberty throughout all the land, unto all the inhabitants thereof^‡."

Secondly, in this year, all the estates that had been sold, were to return to their former proprietors, or to the families to which they originally belonged: so that no family could be sunk and ruined, and doomed to perpetual poverty; as the [Page 119]family estate could not be alienated for more than fifty years^*. The nearer there­fore, that the Jubilee was, the less was the value of the purchase of an estate.^†

These laws, if viewed in a political light, cannot be sufficiently admired: for they effectually prevented the too great oppression of the poor, as well as their being liable to perpetual slavery. By this means the rich were also prevented from accumulating lands upon lands; and a kind of equality was preserved through all their families. Never was there any people^‡ so effectually secured of their liberty and property, as the Israelites were; for God not only engaged so to protect these in­valuable blessings by his providence, that they should not be taken away from [Page 120]them by others; but also provided in a particular manner, by this law, that they should not be thrown away by their own folly; since the property, which every man or family had, in the original division of the land of Canaan, could not be sold, or any way alienated for above half a century, at the utmost.

It hath already been shewn, that exclu­sive of the humane and beneficent laws, which took place in the Sabbatical and Jubilee years, in favour of the poor, the servants, &c. they were not permitted to sow or reap, &c. The question therefore is, what were they to eat when they were thus deprived of the produce of their estates every seventh year? The wise law­giver was fully sensible of this objection, and therefore provided a full answer to it, "And if ye shall say, what shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, not gather in our increase: Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three^* years." This promise (and [Page 121]which was faithfully performed, while they on their part fulfilled the conditions on which it was promised) is an evident demonstration of the divine institution of this law; for here could be no counter­feit; no juggle: such extraordinary fruit­fulness every sixth year, must plainly shew, that the promise could only be made by the Creator of all things, the supreme Lord of the whole world. No human le­gislator, ever durst attempt to make such a promise; and that for his own credit, the credit of his laws, and the safety of his nation, which might be greatly endan­gered, by having a faminc brought upon the land, in case of failure of the promise; and which it was not in the power of any mortal to prevent. But in the history of the Hebrews, we have such a manifest proof of the faithful performance of this promise, that when the nation did not fulfil the conditions of it on their part, they were not only punished with famine,^* [Page 122]but they were also carried captive into a strange country, and their land lay waste for seventy years, till it had fulfilled the sabbatical years which they had not ob­served; agreeable to what Moses, by the command of God, had threatened and foretold so many hundred years before it came to pass:^* and which is such an evi­dent demonstration of the divine mission of Moses, as in my humble opinion can­not be controverted. Let the deep po­litician, the consummate statesman, and the grave philosopher that studies the hu­man heart; who looks into the volume of nature, investigates nature's laws, and deduces effects from causes; weigh, exa­mine, and search into the minutest detail of the laws of Moses, and he will be con­vinced of the divine legislature of Moses.

[Page 123] And, now sir, let us consider your ridi­culous assertion, that, "there is no af­firmative evidence that Moses is the au­thor of those books;"^* What! no af­firmative evidence, you say! In the first place, does not Moses himself tell us that he was the author of them? And Moses wrote this law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi, which bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord, and un­to all the elders of Israel^†. And it came to pass when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book, until they were finished;^‡" Thus he assures us, that he wrote the whole law, till it was perfectly complete.

Secondly, as above shewn, the precepts contained in the law, were founded on his bringing the nation out of Egypt; and which have been observed by the whole nation to this day; from the time of Mo­ses to Joshua: and from him to the time of the judges; to David and to Solo­mon; and during the existence of the [Page 124]temple which the latter built. By all those that were carried captive to Baby­lon: by those that returned from thence with Ezra, as also those that staid behind in Chaldea,^* Assyria, and other eastern provinces: by the Jews that have resided for time immemorial in Cochin,^† and who had no intercourse with the other Jews, till the Dutch came to trade there. By the Jews of Spain, who were carried cap­tive there, at the destruction of the first [Page 125]temple;^* as Abarbanal observes. By all those Jews that were carried captive at the 01 destruction of the second temple, and dispersed all over the globe. By Jose­phus; by the compilers of the Mishna and the Talmud, by that great luminary Maimonides, who lived in the eleventh century, and in his comment on te Mishna, drew up the articles of faith of the Jews: they consist of thirteen articles; three of them have respect to Moses and his law: viz. the seventh, which is the belief of the great degree of the prophecy of Moses: the eighth is "the belief that the law is from God; that is," as he observes, "we are to believe ALL the law which we now have, is the very same law given to Moses; and that he received it all from the mouth of God, the historical part as well as the preceptive; and no one else knew of such historical facts, or had any such source of information; and there­fore he was called [...] a scribe; be­cause he acted as one that wrote from the [Page 126]mouth of another; for which reason, we seldom or ever find him speaking in his own person, but as one that is copying from a book, or what another is rehears­ing to him," &c. By this, you may also clearly perceive what little force there is in your pitiful objection, that "the books cannot be written by Moses, because they are written in the third person." It is, indeed, so weak, that I am surprised, a person of your sagacity should adopt it. But when I consider, that almost all your objections are taken from one infidel wri­ter or another, my wonder is turned into contempt. The ninth, is "the belief of the immutability of the law." This, fir, is a part of the confession of faith of the Jews at present: and has always been so, from Moses to the present hour; and you cannot produce any period from the time of Moses till now, that it has not been their saith: for even the Samaritans, (who never received but the five books of Moses) the Sadducees, and the Karites, those enemies to tradition, all held the same. And which also shews the absur­dity of what you assert, that these books [Page 127]were "written by some very ignorant and stupid pretenders to authorship, several hundred years after the death of Moses." For at no time whatever, could a spurious history be imposed upon them, without some one starting up to detect it. It there­fore is incumbent on you to prove at what time it could have been done: for asser­tions without proof, are of no weight; especially in a cause of such importance. What! ignorant pretenders to authorship write the books of Moses? If you were possessed of the least knowledge of the sa­cred language, you would easily be able to discern, that the purity and elegance of the diction,^* gives the lie to your as­sertion. Let any one but compare these books (in the original) with the writings that are known to have been written some [Page 128]hundred years after the death of Moses, immediately after their return from Baby­lon, by Ezra, &c. and they will be fully convinced of the truth of what I have advanced: and the futility of what you have asserted.

Besides, at what time could such an innovation take place? at what time did the nation first submit to this imposition? to be obliged to offer their first fruits, to give tithes to the priests, the Levites, the poor, the fatherless, and the widow; to be compelled to leave their habitations three times in a year, and come from the most distant parts to Jerusalem, (leaving the whole country to the defence of old men, women and children) and bring free gifts with them: to let their lands lay waste every seventh, and every fif­tieth year; and thereon to remit all debts, let all purchased servants go free, and all estates return to their first owners? I say, when could all this have been introduc­ed? for there was no time from the time of Moses to this hour, when such an im­posture could have been accomplished, without being detected. Is it to be ima­gined, [Page 129]that the whole body of the nation should concur in carrying on such a fraud against themselves, and that there should not be found one among them, that had either ability or honesty to discover it? Nay, that all Israel, for upwards of three thousand years, through the several pe­riods of their commonwealth, the revolu­tions of empires, and the vicissitudes of time; in prosperity and adversity; dur­ing a long and dreadful exile, dispersion, poverty and persecution, such as no nati­on ever suffered; should yet continue to act in a manner that evinceth the strong­est conviction of the divine origin of the laws of Moses; though, according to your assertion, there is not the least foun­dation for such a rational belief? Surely, there are none so credulous as to be capa­ble of believing such things as these.

It is also well known that other legis­lators have pretended to divine inspirati­on, but they were scarcely believed, even during their lives, and this belief soon vanished away. But this is not the case in regard to the divine legation of Moses; No sir, Our ancestors believed it, and [Page 130]their descendants do so to this day: And not only they, but the greater part of the inhabitants of this globe: Heathens^*, Christians and Mahometans, who, though so opposite in their religious sentiments; agreeing in nothing, but in their hatred and contempt of the nation; yet, all concur in the belief of the divine mission of Moses. Whence then this difference, sir? Is it not because imposition vanishes, but truth stands the test?

[Page 131] And now,^* Mr. Paine, and ye Deists and Infidels of every description, who have written with such acrimony, and indecent levity, against the authority of the books of Moses, what have ye to say? Will ye, with all this mass of evidence a­gainst you, and staring you in the face, still have the assurance to take up your pens, and continue to impose on the weak, the ignorant and unwary, by asserting, that the work of the inspired penman is nought but fiction, when it is as evident as demonstration can make truth appear, that it all is the word of God. What shadow of pretence have ye now to produce, for continuing the immoral and blasphemous charge? What have ye still to offer against the pure, just, moral, humane and truly benevolent religion of Moses? Is there a virtue that it does not inculcate, or a vice that it does not condemn? In short, what­ever can render a man respectable in his own eyes, and dear to his fellow crea­tures: whatever can insure the peace and [Page 132]happiness of society, and make man hap­py, both here and hereafter, is there pla­ced in the list of duties.

It is no wonder then to find even Mo­ses himself struck with admiration at the excellence of these laws; and to hear him break out in transport, thus^* "And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgements so righteous, as all this law which I set before you this day."

BEFORE I take leave of the Pentate­uch, I shall take notice of another objec­tion you have made to the books of Mo­ses being the word of God, because, as you say, it is therein said, "that they (the Israelites) came by stealth upon whole nations of people, who as the his­tory itself shews, had given them no of­fence; that they put all those nations to the sword; that they spared neither age nor infancy; that they utterly destroyed men, women and children; that they left not a soul to breathe. The bible tells us, that those assassinations were done by the ex­press command of God. To believe there­fore the Bible to be true, we must unbe­lieve all our belief in the moral justice of God; for wherein could crying or sinil­ing [Page 134]infants offend?" This objection, as are almost all those that you have brought against the Bible, is not new; it has been urged by Voltaire, Bolingbroke, Morgan, &c. and often refuted by several writers; some in one manner; and some in ano­ther; whether what I shall advance on the subject will be more satisfactory, must be left to the opinion of the candid and judicious reader.

I have already observed,^* that God called Abraham, and selected him and his family, to be the repository of the sacred oracles, and to hand down the knowledge of the true worship of God, and his unity, &c. God therefore promised Abraham to give his posterity the land of Canaan, with a design to make them a separate people, to preserve them from the infec­tion of idolatrous principles, which were then so prevalent. Now, it is well known that the Canaanites, as well as the Egyp­tians, were deep sunk in idolatry; and which had so far prevailed among them, that they sacrificed their children to Mo­loch: "for every abomination to the [Page 135]Lord, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters have they burnt in fire to their gods."^* And, these abominable practices, seem in a manner, to have been authorised not only by custom, but by some command. "After the doings of the land of Egypt wherein ye dwelt shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances."^† This shews that their bar­barous rites, were founded on certain laws and statutes; for this is what the word [...]properly signifies. And, indeed, nothing less than a pretence to some direction of sacred authority, could induce them to act so contrary to all natu­ral and moral principles. But by such pretended laws, they could allow and recommend incestuous^‡ marriages and [Page 136]the^* sacrificing of innocent children. For this excess of vice, we find them remarka­ble, as early as the time when the promise of their country was made to Abraham.^† This being the case, how can we complain if God, after having beheld their abomi­nable practices for such a space of time, and perceiving no signs of repentance and reformation among them, should at length punish them with a most awful severity: and thus, not only put an end to their abounding wickedness, but also make others, and particularly the Israelites, who were to possess their country, stand in awe and dread the danger of imitating them in their abominations; as Moses says,^‡ "Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things; for in all these the nations are [Page 137]defiled which I cast out before you. And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land it­self vomiteth our her inhabitants. Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgements, and shall not commit any of these abominations; that the land spew not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spewed out the nations that were before you."

Now, if considered in this light, the extirpation of those nations, must appear to be no more than a just visitation of the divine displeasure, for their atrocious wickedness. The Israelites are therefore to be considered, in this matter, as no more than the instruments of the divine vengeance. And why might not Jehovah, the bestower, and therefore the sovereign of life, with equal justice cut off these sin­ful nations and their posterity, by the in­tervention of human agents, as destroy them by an earthquake, inundation, fire from heaven, famine, pestilence, or any similar judgment: in which case, smiling and crying infants must also have equally [Page 138]suffered? Had God then thought proper to have destroyed them, thus we should have revered, without daring to blame, such a tremendous display of his justice and power: where then, I fain would ask, is the material difference? In either case, his conduct is equally justifiable.

But that which I would principally in­sist upon, is, that the Israclites were not absolutely commanded to extirpate the Cannanites: and for the better under­standing of which, it is necessary to take notice of a part^* of the military laws of the Hebrews: which is as follows. "When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then shall it be that all the people that is found therein, shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against [Page 139]thee, then shalt thou besiege it: And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself: and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee. Thus shalt thou do un­to all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance: thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: But thou shalt utterly destroy them, namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaan­ites, and the Perrizites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee^*." When this passage is duly considered, we shall find, that, first, they were obliged to send them an offer of peace: for this law was general, as "When thou goest forth to battle against thine enemies^†, &c. When thou [Page 140]comest nigh unto a city to fight against." &c. There was no distinction in this case; it did not matter, whether they were far or near, in regard to the proclamation of peace: for thus is it understood by all our Rabbins, ^* who observe, that they were obliged to offer peace to the seven nations, as did Moses to Sihon: (Numb. xxi. 21.) and if they answered peace; then were they to become tributary, and be permit­ted to remain in the country on condition of their renouncing idolatry, and observing the seven precepts of the sons of Noah.^† The real distinction therefore between these, was this, that if the nations who were far off, refused to make peace, they were to kill all the males; that is, all those [Page 141]that bore arms, for then every man was a soldier; and they were not allowed to kill any but those that opposed them, as al­ready mentioned.^* It therefore must be observed, that this is a permission, not an order given: they were allowed to kill those that opposed them, and none^† else: and therefore the women and children were to be preserved alive. But, if any of the cities of the seven nations refused to make peace with them, then they were not to save alive any thing that breatheth: and the reason is immediately given; "that they teach you not to do after all [Page 142]their abominations, which they have done unto their gods, so should ye sin against the Lord your God."^*

But if they were willing to make peace Israel was obliged to make peace with either of them: whether those that were far off; or those that were near; all were equal in this particular. And there­fore our rabbins say, that upon Joshua's entering the land of promise, he published three proclamations; first, "that those inclined to make peace, should have peace granted to them. Second, those that in­tended to war, should have war. And third, those that wished to depart, might freely depart." Hence it is manifest that they were obliged to offer them peace: and which is plain, from Josh. xi. 19-20. "There was not a city which made peace with the children of Israel, save the Hi­vites, the inhabitants of Gibeon: all other they took in battle. For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts that they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly, and that [Page 143]they might have no favor, but that he might destroy them, as the Lord com­manded Moses." And which, plainly implies, that if they had not been so ob­stinate, as to engage in a war with the Israelites, and to appear in arms against them, but had repented, and submitted their proposals, they would have been saved, instead of being put to death; consistent with the divine command con­cerning their excision. If therefore the Canaanites met with destruction from the victorious sword of the Israelites, they had none but themselves to blame. By complying with the reasonable terms of­fered to them, it was in their power to prevent it.

I am, however, aware that the case of the Gibeonites may be urged as an excep­tion to the position here laid down: as we find the Israelites expressing them­selves in the following terms to them, "Peradventure ye dwell among us; and how shall we make a league with^* you?" By which, it would appear at first view, [Page 144]that they could not make peace with any of those nations: but this objection will instantly vanish, when the exact meaning of the words made use of, by the Gibeon­ites, is clearly understood: for they did not simply ask for peace, but said, "now therefore make ye a league with^* us." That is, as the Israclites understood it, to treat them as confederates, as allies; to admit them to a league of equal right and privilege, such as one independent state enters into with another. And which the Israelites could by no means comply with; because they were so often commanded not to make 2 covenant with them, lest it should be a snare to them; (see Exod. xxiii. 34. xxxiv. 12—15. & Deut. vii. 2.) they therefore said, how can I make a league with you, seeing it is so strictly forbidden to make a covenant with any of these nations; although we are per­mitted to let them live, on their asking for peace, and, submitting to the conditions annexed thereto: viz. the renouncing all idol worship and becoming tributary. [Page 145]This is manifest from the manner in which they behaved to the Gibeonites, when they found that they were of the seven nations; for otherwise, no oath could have been binding on the Israelites, (much less one obtained by fraud) to oblige them to violate the command of God, in suffer­ing those to live that he had doomed to die. This may also be farther proved from the lenity shewn to the inhabitants of Ge­zer;^* to Rahab,^† and to the family in Bethel:^‡ from all which, it is demonstra­ble, that if the Canaanites had repented, and submitted to renounce all their idol worship, and become tributary, they would not have been cut off. But their abomi­nable and atrocious wickedness was the only, and sole cause of their excision: and clearly shews the futility of your objec­tion.

YOU observe (p. 18), "I proceed to the book of Joshua, and to shew that Joshua is not the author of that book, and that it is anonymous, and without authority." I shall not spend my time to shew how unconnected your conclusion is with your premises, as the learned bishop of Landaff has clearly pointed out the fallacy of your argument, by shewing that a book may be anonymous, and yet not be without authority. I, therefore, do not mean to contend with you concern­ing Joshua's writing the book that bears his name, because I am convinced he did not write it: for it is no where said that he wrote it, as is testified of Moses (as above mentioned, page 121—122): but only after Joshua had delivered his exhor­tation, [Page 147]it says^*, "And Joshua wrote these words in the book of the law of God, and took a great stone," &c. If then, he had written the whole book, it would also have been mentioned; I, there­fore, am of opinion, with the learned Abarbanal (See his preface to Joshua), that the prophet Samuel wrote the books of Joshua (except the part which Joshua wrote himself), Judges, Ruth, and a part of the book that bears his name; and which was finished by Nathan the prophet, and Gad the seer (as mentioned 1 Chron. xxix. 29.); but all this does not deduct from their authenticity, or invali­date their authority in the least: as even on this scheme they were written by the prophets; and are very properly called the word of God, from the words above quoted; where what Joshua wrote, is said to be written in the law of God: and also because they direct us to the true worship of God, by clearly pointing out to us the merciful dealings of God to­wards Israel; and which is the great end [Page 148]and purpose for which they were design­ed; for the principal end of the book of Joshua, is to testify that all promises which God made to our ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as recorded in the law of God, by the hands of Moses, concerning the conquest and possession of the land, were all fully accomplished; and of which Joshua himself bare witness in his public exhortation to Israel, in his old age, "And behold, this day I am going the way of all the earth: and ye know in all your hearts, and in all your souls, that not one thing hath failed of all the good things which the Lord your God spake concern­ing you; all are come to pass unto you, and not one thing hath failed thereof."^* And which was a manifest proof of the divine mission of Moses; as every thing that he had predicted was fully accom­plished. And which must undoubtedly have made a great impression on their minds, by convincing them of the omni­potent power of divine providence; and thus induce them strictly to adhere to the [Page 149]worship of the true God; and to which the admonition of Joshua also greatly ten­ded, by placing before them the dreadful consequence of disobedience, "Therefore it shall come to pass, that as all the good things are come upon you, which the Lord your God promised you; so shall the Lord bring upon you all the evil things, until he have destroyed you from off this good land which the Lord your God hath given you."^* And the good effects of all this, may be easily perceived; first, in the affair of the altar raised by the chil­dren of Reuben and Gad,^† &c. wherein it is shewn how tenacious they were of adhering to God's worship; and how fearful of having any thing among them, that appeared like idolatry; and second­ly, by what is recorded of them in the 31st verse of the last chapter of the book of Joshua, "And Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders that outlived Joshua and which had known all the works of the Lord, that he had done for Israel."

This leads me to take notice of what [Page 150]you are merrily pleased to call, the "tale of the sun standing still upon Mount Gi­beon, and the moon in the valley of Aja­lon,"^* and which you farther say, "is one of those fables that detects itself. Such a circumstance could not have hap­pened without being known all over the world. Whereas, there is not a nation that knows any thing about it." But how should they, when it is well known, that there is not a nation in the world whose annals reach this aera by some hundred years? And yet, my good friend, it will perhaps appear that you are mistaken as to the fact, for the same supernatural phaenomenon is recorded in the ancient Chinese annals, to have happened and been observed there, in the reign of their 8th monarch You: though according to their fabulous manner, they say it lasted ten days. (Anc. Univ. Hist. Vol. 18. p. 107.) To this may also be added what Herodotus says, the Egyptian priests told him; viz. that the sun had four times deviated from his course, having twice risen where he [Page 151]uniformly goes down, and twice gone down where he uniformly rises: by which you may perceive, that the Egyptians had also a confused tradition concerning the two miracles respecting the sun, as record­ed in scripture.

You say, "as a poetical figure, the whole is well enough;"^* but although there are some commentators who may view it in this light; and that perhaps for the reason alledged by a certain Christian writer, who says, "but because there seems, to my apprehension at least, no suf­ficient reason for such supernatural appear­ance in this instance:"^† But if duly con­sidered, it will appear that it was extreme­ly necessary, at this juncture, as being highly conducive in promoting the grand design; I mean, the establishment of the true religion, and the extirpation of Idol­atry: and in which light, we must also view the dividing of the river Jordan, and the casting of hail stones from heaven upon the Canaanites, &c. inasmuch as they all tended to fill the nations with [Page 152]astonishment,^* and to imprint on their minds,^† as well as those of the Israelites, the highest conceptions of the majesty and greatness of the Lord Jehovah: and thus make them sensible of the sin and folly of trusting in any other god but him: for it is well known that at this time all nations had their several tutelar deities, to whose protection they committed themselves and their country, and to whose assistance^‡ they ascribed their successes in war. Now, the principal deities which the Canaanites worshipped, were the sin,^§ moon, and the heavens, or air. To convince them then, that the gods in whom they trusted were entirely subject to the will of the God of Israel; and at the same time to punish them for the false worship they paid to them, "the Lord cast down great hail stones from heaven (or the air) upon them unto Azekah;" and then stopped the two great luminaries in their course. And therefore it says, "in the sight of [Page 153]all Israel," that all Israel might receive in­struction from it, and be deterred from falling into the like idolatry: and no doubt it was to this in a great measure; that they shewed their dread and detesta­tion of it, in the affair of the Reubenites, &c. building the altar; as above menti­oned. (page 150) Hence it is manifest, that this miracle is to be considered, as a link in the great chain of miracles, began by Moses, to convince and punish the na­tions, as well as to wean the Israelites from that idolatry, to which they were so prone.

How that the miracle was performed, it is impossible for us to explain; neither do I think it at all necessary; it is sufficient, as we have shewn, that the end it was in­tended for was worthy of God. And in testimony of the reality of the miracle, we find that, when the prophet Habakkuk, in his^* prayer for the preservation of the nation, in this long and dreadful captivity, recounted all the miracles and wonders which God performed for Israel when he [Page 154]brought them out of Egypt: he likewise enumerated all those performed in the conquest of Canaan: "The mountains saw thee and they trembled: the over­flowing of waters passed away: the deep uttered its voice, and lifted up its hands on high. The sun and the moon stood still in their habitation: by the light of thine arrows they went, and by the bright­ness of thy glittering spear. In thine in­dignation didst thou march through the land; in thy wrath didst thou tread^* the nations. Thou wentest forth for the sal­vation of thy people, even for the salva­tion of thine anointed." By the moun­tains trembling, he meant the kings of Ca­naan, who trembled, and were in pangs: and thus says Moses in his song:^† "All the inhabitants of Canaan shall melt away. Fear and dread shall fall upon them;" the overflowing of the waters denotes the streams when Jordan was divided: and the deep uttering its voice, denotes the fame of that miracle through all the land of Canaan:^‡ the lifting up of its hands [Page 155]on high, denotes that the lower streams of Jordan, whose banks were then over­flowed,^* passed away towards the Red Sea, whilst the upper waves stood on an heap. The sun and moon standing still in their habitation, requires no explana­tion: the arrows and glittering spear, de­note the instruments of destruction which God employed; the great hail stones; and which may be metaphorically called his arrows and spear; and by whose light the Israelites walked: thus did God, in wrath and indignation, on account of the great and abominable wickedness of the Canaanites, march through the land, and crushed them, as corn is by the drag; and which was, when he went forth for the salvation of his people. Thus we see the prophet describing in sublime figurative language, all the mira­cles performed in the conquest of Canaan; amongst which none is so plain and clear as this of the sun and moon standing still; and which is an evident proof of the truth thereof: especially, [Page 156]when it is considered, that the subject of the prophet's prayer was for the preser­vation of the nation in this captivity, which God informed him of upwards of six hundred years before it took place.

There is also another proof of the re­ality of this miracle; which is the appeal that the author of the book of Joshua makes to the book of Jasher, as a testi­mony of the fact which he was then re­cording, "Is not this written in the book of Jasher?" Hence it is manifest, that the book commonly called the book of Jasher, existed, and was well known at the time the book of Joshua was written: and pray, sir, what book do you think this was? Why, none other than the law of Moses. I see you are surprised; but hold, sir, I will presently explain this to you. The word in the Hebrew (with which, I judge, you are totally un­acquainted, though so highly requisite in the task you have undertaken), is [...] Hayashar; and which, according to the rules of Hebrew grammar, is a noun sub­stantive common, and not a noun substan­tive proper; as, in the latter case, the [Page 157] [...] he notificative, which denotes the ar­ticle the, could not have obtained; (See Lingua Sacra, Vol. Ist. p. 109. &c.) for which reason, it ought properly to have been translated the righteous, not Jasher; and it would be nonsense to say the Ja­sher. The writer, therefore, when re­cording the miracle, according to the idi­om and phraseology of the language in which he was writing, expresses himself thus, "Is not this written in the book of the righteous? i. e. in the law of the righteous God. Has not this been pre­dicted in that righteous book? Yes, most certainly. But, perhaps you may ask, where? Be patient, and I will tell you. When Moses was blessing Israel before his death, he told them of the happiness they were to enjoy in the land, and that they should atchieve the conquest thereof by the especial miraculous assistance of the God of Israel; he expressed himself in this manner^*, "There is none like unto the God of Jeshurun, who rideth upon [Page 158]the heaven in thy help, and his excellen­cy is on the skies. Which is the habita­tion of the eternal God, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy before thee, and shall say destroy them." By this sublime figurative language, the prophet foretold the destruction of their enemies in the land of Canaan; and which should be, by the power of him who rideth above the heavens: who guideth all by his om­nipotent power: the mover of the hea­vens: who only is able to stop the hea­venly luminaries in their course, "till the people had avenged themselves of their enemies.^* Agreeable to what is here written, "And shall say, destroy them." And the consequence of this will be, that "Israel shall then dwell in safety alone, according to the form of the blessing of Ja­cob, † on a land of corn and wine, al­so his heaven shall drop dew."

He then concludes, "Happy art thou O Israel! Who is like unto thee, O peo­ple^‡ [Page 159]saved by the Lord, the shield of thy lielp, and who is the sword of thine ex­cellency! and thine enemies shall be found liars unto thee, and thou shalt tread upon their high places." In the conquest of Canaan, it may well be said, that the Lord was the shield of their help, and the sword of their excellency. The Gibeon­ites, a part of their enemies, were found liars to them, by pretending that they came from a far country, when they dwelt in the land: and the treading on their high places, denoted the dastruction of the five kings in this battle, on whose necks Joshua commanded his captains to tread, as is said,^* "Joshua called for all the men of Israel, and said unto the cap­tains of the men of war which went with him, Come near, put your feet upon the necks of these kings: for thus shall the Lord do to all your enemies against whom ye fight." In this sense the Chaldee paraphrast Onkelas, who lived in the first century, also understands it.^† I shall [Page 160]give his translation in his own words, [...] And thou shalt tread on the joints of the necks of their kings. See also Jarchi, Abarb. &c.

Thus is the reality of this miracle not only confirmed, but the prediction of Mo­ses, is also fully verified; and the exist­ence of the law of Moses at that time, clearly preved: as it would have been madness in the author, to have appealed in proof of his veracity, to a book that never yet had existence, or that was not well known in the nation, as an authentic book.

The end of the other three books, viz. Judges, Samuel, and Kings is also to in­form us of the particular providence of God; by shewing, that in the days of the Judges, as well as those of the kings, the nation was exceedingly wicked; for­saking the true worship of God, and com­mitting idolatry, &c. for which they were delivered into the hands of their enemies; but when they sincerely repented, and [Page 161]returned to God, their enemies fell be­fore them; and they enjoyed the greatest prosperity and happiness that possibly could be; as in the reigns of David and Solomon: all which, was a manifest proof of the superintendance of divine provi­dence, and of the truth of what Moses had told them, concerning the reward and punishment, which they were to expect in case of obedience or disobedience: and which was fully accomplished in every particular; till that, for the great wick­edness of the nation, and their kings, they were destroyed from off the goodly land, as Joshua had also told them; and as is recorded in those books: and which is a demonstrable proof of their authority.

As to the difference between the books of Kings and Chronicles, I must tell you, that they have been noticed by several Hebrew commentators, and clearly ac­counted for by that great luminary, the learned Abarbanal, as he has shewn, that there is nothing contradictory in the dif­ferent books, but that each writer, had a different purpose in view; and which easi­ly [Page 162]accounts for the omissions in one book, though related in the other: but as it would swell these letters, (which already exceed the limits I first intended) to the bulk of a large volume, I must omit en­tering into the explanation at present, and reserve it for my commentary on the Old Testament.

I should indeed extend these letters to a length troublesome to myself, and tiresome to the reader, were I minutely to answer every objection you have made, and to rectify the numberless errors into which you have fallen: I therefore did not in­tend to have said any more on the subject of these four books; but the ridicule you have made use of in a note, on the story of the angel appearing to Joshua, deserves the severest reprehensions; for that being so ignorant of sacred literature, you should thus profanely jest, with what you do not in the least understand, as I shall plainly shew.

That person, whoever he be, that at­tempts to criticise on scripture, ought not only to have a great knowledge of the Hebrew, but also a thorough acquaint­ance [Page 163]with the idiom and phraseology of the sacred language, so different from all others: or he will certainly fail in the at­tempt, and render himself ridiculous in the eyes of every discerning person, and justly merit their contempt. Of the truth of this observation, there cannot be a greater, than will appear in the explana­tion of the subject in question. Before I proceed to the explanation, it is necessary to enquire why Joshua, who was the com­mander in chief, as well as the ruler of the nation, when he saw a man, for the text does not say an angel, at a distance, should go up to him himself, and ask him, art thou for us, or for our adversaries? as this ought to have been done by some of the troops, who ought to have gone and seized him and brought him to Joshua, and not Joshua have gone to him, as it might perhaps have been his intention, to assassinate the commander in chief; it therefore is something uncommon, that Joshua, who was ninety three years old, should thus expose himself to danger. But the solution of this is, that as the text says, "And it came to pass when Joshua was by [Page 164]Jericho,"^* that is, he was considering, how and by what means he should take Jericho, as it was so strongly fortified; "he lift up his eyes, and looked, and be­hold there stood a man over against him," by the word [...] opposite him, we are to understand that the man was visible to Joshua only^†; and, therefore, he imme­diately knew that it was an angel, and not a human person, for which reason, he went to him in person; and seeing him with a drawn sword in his hand, the en­sign of destruction, he asked him, "art thou for us, or for our adversaries? Hast thou thy sword drawn to assist us, or to afflict us in favour of the enemy? To which he answered, "Nay, but as cap­tain of the host of the Lord am I now come." Think not, Joshua, that you are the captain of the Lord's host (i. e. Israel) in this business, and therefore dost challenge, me, whether I am for you or [Page 165]your enemies: No; it is not so: but I am (appointed) the captain of the host of the Lord; and for that reason am I now come. When Joshua heard this, he "fell on his face to the earth, and did obeisance" to him as his superior^*, "and said unto him, what saith my lord^† unto his servant?" For as you are the captain, it is my duty to pay obedience to your commands. The angel then in­formed him of the end and purpose for which he came; which was to inform him that Jericho was not to be taken by any human means; and therefore he said un­to him, "Loose thy shoe from off thy foot, for the place whereon thou standest is holy." That is, do not busy yourself in forming schemes for the taking of the city, because it can only be taken in a supernatural manuer. And thus we find [Page 166]it said to Moses, when he turned aside to see why the bush was not consumed, "put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest," &c. Do not attempt to account for this, on the principles of nature; for it is not a natu­ral cause, but a supernatural one;^* and which was denoted by God's calling the place^† holy. When, therefore, Joshua heard this of the angel, it says, "And Joshua did so." Not that he pulled his shoe off, but that he immediately desisted from attempting to reduce it by any stra­tagem of war; and, therefore, it says, [Page 167]"Now Jericho was straitly shut up, none went out, and none came in." It was not to be taken by any human power; and, therefore, the word of God came immediately unto Joshua, to inform him, that though it could not be reduced by any human force, yet, "I have given into thy hand Jericho, and the kings thereof." &c. Hence the cause of the appearance of the angel is manifest: for as Joshua, who was just going to engage in a war with so many nations, and find­ing the first city that he was going to at­tack so strongly fortified, he was naturally much taken up in thought, to find out the means of reducing it; as well know­ing that a miscarriage in the first onset, might lead to the most dreadful conse­quences, even the entire destruction of the whole nation; as he himself patheti­cally expresses it, on the failure of their attempt against Ai^*; the angel, there­fore, came to inform him, that he had no occasion to employ any human force or stratagems of war to reduce Jericho, [Page 168]but only to obey the command of God in all things; and to ascribe the glory of his conquests to the author of them, the Lord of hosts. Thus encouraging him to trust solely in God, in the arduous bu­siness he was then employed in; and which we find, was actually the case in the conquest of the land of Canaan. As to your low wit about pulling off the shoe it no doubt originated in your ignorance, as you ought to have known that this rite was an indication of reverence for the di­vine presence, when all human and world­ly thoughts ought to be set aside: for which reason, the priests always officiated barefooted in the temple.

The two books of Ezra and Nehemiah you allow to be genuine books, as being written by the authors whose name they bear, giving an account of the return of the Jews from the Babylonish captivity, about four hundred and fifteen years be­fore the christian aera; but then you ob­serve,^* "Those accounts are nothing to us, nor to any other person, unless it be [Page 169]to the Jews, as a part of the history of their nation: and there is just as much of the word of God in those books, as there is in any of the histories of France, or Rapin's history of England." Whatever these books may be to you, or any other deist or infidel, they are of the highest importance to us as Jews; and not only to us, but likewise to all who believe the Old Testament to be the word of God; as far as the full completion of prophecy is a proof of the truth of revelation. The prophet Jeremiah said,^† "For thus saith the Lord, surely when seventy years have been completed at Babylon, I will visit you, and I will perform towards you my good promise, in bringing you again to to this place." Now, the very first verse of the book of Ezra, which you allow to be a genuine book, proves the full com­pletion of this prophecy, so contrary to all human foresight. "Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jere­miah [Page 170]might be fulfilled; the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus," &c. Surely you cannot say this is nothing to us; I mean to you and me: I as a true believer, you as an unbeliever; because it is perfectly decisive in the cause at issue between us; for if the book of Ezra, which you allow to be a genuine book, proves that Jere­miah was a true prophet, there is an end of all dispute between us; because here is a demonstration of the truth of divine revelation, admitted by yourself, as you allow the genuineness of the book that records the completion of the prophecy Nay, these books not only confirm the truth of Jeremiah's prophecy, but like­wise prove the authenticity of the books of Moses, Joshua, Judges, Kings, and Chronicles; all which are referred to by Ezra and Nehemiah, as containing the religion, laws and history of the Jewish nation, from Abraham to that very time.^* Of this, it appears to me, you was fully sensible; and therefore wished to invali­date the testimony of those books, by giv­ing [Page 171]the authors a side blow: observing,^* "But even in masters of historical record, neither of those writers are to be depend­ed upon." As a proof of which you tell us, that the total amount of the num­ber of those who returned from Babylon, does not agree with the several particu­lars. But is it to be supposed that a man of Ezra's acknowledged abilities, should not be able to give us the sum total of forty-two particular sums? Neither is it usual for impostors to make such glaring blunders, that every school boy may de­tect. But the truth of the matter is, as Jarchi observes, that "those above men­tioned in the particulars, were of the tribe of Judah and Benjamin, and the priests; and the difference in the sum total, was made up of those of the other tribes."^† Thus also it is explained in Seder On­glam.

You seem to speak well of the book of Job^‡, but at the same time attempt to prove it a gentile book, by saying, "I [Page 172]have seen the opinion of two Hebrew commentators, Aben Ezra and Spinosa, upon this subject; they both say that the book carries no internal evidence of be­ing an Hebrew book; that the genius of the composition, and the drama of the piece, are not Hebrew, that it has been translated from another language into Hebrew, and that the author of the book was a gentile; that the character represented under the name of satan (which is the first and only time this is mentioned in the Bible) does not corre­spond to any Hebrew idea." But where, sir, did you see all this? for in the first place, Spinosa never was admitted an He­brew commentator; all we know of him is, that he wrote several tracts, and after different changes, at length became an atheist. As to Aben Ezra, he only says, on verse 11 of chapter second. "And our Rabbins of blessed memory say, that Moses wrote the book of Job: but I am inclined (to think) that is a translated book; and therefore it is difficult to ex­plain, as are all translated books." But not a word does he say, of its being a a gentile book; nay, in his preface to [Page 173]this book, he seems to acknowledge that it was written by Moses, or at least some other prophet; for there he says, "And of the righteous Job, the prophet testifi­eth that he was singularly righteous in his generation; and that his sufferings were not for any evil he had committed," &c. What you observe concerning satan, is borrowed from your master Voltaire; who says, it is a Chaldean word, and which proves you both to be ignorant of the Hebrew:^* for [...] is incontestably an Hebrew noun, and denotes an adver­sary: an accuser: in which sense, we find it used by Moses, Numb. xxii. 22. "And the angel of the Lord stood in the way, [...] for an adversary against him." See also verse 32. Thus also 1 King. v. 4. [...] There was no ad­versary. The Plur. affix. occurs in Psal. cix. 20. [...] The reward of mine adversaries. The verb also occurs in the same Psalm ver. 4. [...] For my love they bate me. All which, [Page 174]plainly shews the fallacy of what you have advanced: and what truth there is in your assertion.

You also observe,^* "that the book shews itself to be the production of a mind cultivated in science," And was not Moses, to whom this book is ascribed, a man of science? Is it not allowed on all hands, that Moses was instructed in all the learning of the Egyptians, who were well acquainted with arts and sciences, and who had addicted themselves to the study of astronomy^† in the earliest ages? But you say, "The astronomical names, Pleiades, Orion and Arcturus, are Greek, and not Hebrew names; and as it does not appear from any thing that is to be found in the Bible, that the Jews knew any thing of astronomy, or that they stu­died it, they had no translation for those names in their own language, but adop­ted the names as they found them in the Poem^‡." Now it is manifest from the Bible, that the Jews were acquainted [Page 175]with astronomy, and studied it; See Exod. xii. 2. "This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you." As their months were from thenceforward to be lunar months, their year of course fell short of the solar year, eleven days, some sew hours and minutes, and as they were commanded to celebrate the passover in the month Aviv, ^* and which should be in the vernal equinox; they consequently were obliged to make intercalations; as otherwise, the feast would be anticipated eleven days every year; so that in the space of thirty three years, it would be carried backward through all the seasons of the year, as is the case in Turkey; it therefore is plain, that when Moses ap­pointed this sort of year, they were oblig­ed to study astronomy. See what your favorite Hebrew commentator, Aben Ez­ra, says on the subject, Exod. xii. 9. &c. See also Abarb. and R. Levi Ben Ger­shom, in Loc.

You assert that the names of the con­stellations Pleíades, Orion, and Arcturus, [Page 176]are Greek names; but did you ever con­sult the original? if you had, you would have found that the names of the constel­lations mentioned in Job, are as unlike the Greek names which stand in the com­mon translation (the only one you are able to read) as possibly can be: for the word Arcturus, is my Osh, that render­ed Orion is [...] ^* keesel, and that ren­dered Pleíades is [...] kee [...]a. By this, the commonest reader, and the meanest capacity may plainly see, how unfounded your objection is, and with what hesita­tion they ought to admit any of your statements. The preceding piece of false criticism, may be attributed to your igno­rance; but to what shall we attribute what follows: "We know nothing of what the ancient gentile world (as it is called) was before the time of the Jews, whose practice has been to calumniate and blacken the character of all other nati­ons;" [Page 177]&c.—It appears to have been their (the heathen) custom to personify both virtue and vice, by statues and images, as is done now-a-days, both by statuary and by painting; but it does not follow from this, that they worshipped them any more than we do." Is not this curious apology for the heathen's idolatry, made with a view to blacken and calumniate the character of the Jews, and their sa­cred books, because these books clearly shew that they did worship them? See the different accounts given in those books of the abominable worship of the ancient Egyptians, Babylonians, &c. But be­lieve not those books; read profane au­thors (as they are called), and you will find that the worship of images was uni­versal. Did not the Sabians worship ima­ges^*? Did not the Romans worship the Gods? Did not the Grecians worship images? Did not the Ephesians worship [Page 178]the great goddess. Diana? In short, there was not an ancient nation that was not guilty of idolatry, either by image wor­ship, or that of the heavenly bodies, &c.

Of the Psalms, you say^*, "that some are moral, others are very revengeful.— It is, however; an error; or an impositi­on to call them the psalms of David; they are a collection, as song-books are now-a-days." But had you been in the least acquainted with the writings of the He­brews, whose books you have attempted to criticise with such asperity, you would have known that they held that David did not compose the whole of Psalms, as some are inserted therein that were com­posed by Adam, Melchisedeck, Abraham, Moses, Heaman, Jeduthun, Asaph, and the three sons of Korab ^†, but they are called the Psalms of David, because he composed the major part of them; and they are wonderfully instructive, as being every where full of the praises of God, [Page 179]the remembrance of his loving kindness to himself, as also to the nation; besides moral precepts, and such sentiments as are adapted to make a man good and hap­py in every station of life.

But why did you not consult the He­brew commentator Aben Ezra on the subject? If you had, you would have found that in his preface to Psalms, he is decidedly of opinion that the Psalms are not a collection of songs, as you fool­ishly assert; but sacred hymns; several of which are prophetical; (as I shall shew at large in my Dissertations on the Pro­phecies, the second Volume of which is just published) and that they all were written by [...] the inspiration ^* of the holy spirit: and that David was a prophet. How you, who are such a mi­nute enquirer after truth, came to over­look this, which would have prevented your exposing yourself to ridicule, I know not; but if it was owing to your not [Page 180]finding in the writings of your infidel mas­ters any traces of it, I really pity you; because your own ignorance utterly pre­cludes you from reaping any advantage from the writings of such an eminent commentator, (as his works have never been translated into our venacular tongue) especially, as you seem to have a great deference for his opinion: and which must certainly be a very great misfortune to you, as it exposes you to commit such egregious blunders, as must render you truly contemptible.

The Proverbs of Solomon, you esteem a jest book, but this is nothing extraordi­nary; for if the Psalms of David is esteem­ed by you a song book, why may not Proverbs be a jest book? However, if you had consulted Aben Ezra on the sub­ject, he would have taught you better. He would have taught you, that "this part^* is admonitory; and acquaints us with the exalted degree of the eternal wisdom, for by it,^† the world was called [Page 181]into existence from nonentity: he there­fore admonishes us to adhere to it, and to turn aside from the abominable woman: he also instructs us, to destroy the foolish appetites incident to creatures formed of matter; and thus preserve alive the im­mortal soul." This sir, is what he would have taught you; and can you perceive any jest in all this? But stop, hear Solo­mon himself, "The fear of Jehovah, is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction." This, sir, is no jest; but if contrary to all the rules of right reason, you should still per­sist in asserting it to be a jest, I should not scruple to pronounce you in earnest to be one of those fools that "despise wisdom and instruction." Let us proceed, "My son, hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother." That is, next to God, let me advise thee, my son, to reverence thy parents: and not only to hearken unto thy father when he instructs thee in the fear of God, or tells thee thou hast done amiss; but also to let thy mother's commands be a law to [Page 182]thee. And happy would it have been for many, had they atended to this admo­nition; in which I am sure you can see no jest. Again, "My son, it sinners en­tice thee, consent thou not." My son, walk not thou in the way with them: refrain thy foot from their path. For their feet run to evil and make haste to shed blood," &c. These are a few of the proverbs of Solomon, contained in the first chapter of Solomon's "jest book." I imagine they are rather too grave to cause merriment; but they may be of great, service in making a person wise and virtuous. Pity you did not read this jest book through with becoming attention: if you had, it would have taught you to "Be not wise in thine own eyes: but to fear the Lord and depart from evil."

The book of Ecclesiastes ^* you say, "is written as the solitary reflections of a worn out debauchee, such as Solomon [Page 183]was, who looking back on scenes he can no longer enjoy, cries out, All is vanity!" ²³¹ Attend now to the words of Aben Ezra, who after shewing the difference between good and bad actions, &c. and that every man finds his own way pure in his own sight; observes, "But the Lord God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Solomon his beloved, to explain acceptable words, and to teach us the path of rectitude," &c. And indeed, the whole work is uniform, (though there are many detached senti­ments and proverbs interspersed) and con­fined to one subject; viz. the vanity of the world, which is exemplified by the experience of Solomon, introduced in the character of a person investigating a very difficult question; examining the argu­ments on both sides, and at length disen­gaging himself from an anxious and doubt­ful disputation, by observing, "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter, Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man."^†

[Page 184] As to Solomon's sins and debaucheries, with which you wish to blacken his wri­tings, they are so far from derogating from the purity of his doctrine, that all is vanity, but the fear and love of God, that on the contrary, they strongly enforce it; by teaching us the following important truths. First, not to slight the command of God; for as we find it commanded, that the king "shall not multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away."^* Solomon, by slighting this commandment, actually fell into the crime foretold as the consequence of the breach of it. Second­ly, that though he was so great and wise a king, yet was he immediately severely punished for his sins, by having the king­dom rent from him, and given to Jerobo­am: and which is a manifest proof of the divine superintendance of the actions of mankind, however high and exalted their station: and which ought to make us all extremely cautious of offending the most high in any degree whatever.

You say Solomon's Songs are amorous [Page 185]and foolish enough, but which wrinkled fanaticism has called divine.—I hope you do not account Aben Ezra a wrinkled fanatic. Now he is decidedly against you, for he says, "This poem is an entire sa­cred allegory. It commences at the time of Abraham, and extends to the time of the Messiah: and which describes (if I may use the expression) the conjugal uni­on of God with the Jewish Church: which, as a peculiar people, having been selected by him from among all nations; he had (as it were) ratified his choice by a solemn covenant. This is the solemn compact, so frequently celebrated by al­most all the sacred writers under the same image; and who have therefore compar­ed the nation's committing idolatry, to a woman being guilty of adultry towards her husband. He also says, "Far be it, far be it from us, to imagine that the song of songs, contains any thing amorous, but is entirely figurative." Thus you stumble step by step, till at last, I fear you will fall, and rise no more. Excuse my freedom, but really my patience is al­most [Page 186]exhausted; I am quite weary of wading through such a farrago of nonsense, ignorance, futility, and indecent levity. How must the Hebraist smile, to hear you with an air of importance, violently declaiming against the compilers of the Bible, for the placing of Solomon's song after Ecclesiastes, &c. as any little Jew school-boy, could have told you, that they are not placed thus in the Hebrew Bible. There, the arrangement is as follows, First, the Pentateuch: Second, the for­mer Prophets, viz. Joshua, Judges, Sa­muel, and kings: Third, the latter pro­phets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malichi: Fourth, the Hagiography, which contains, Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Song of songs, Ruth, La­mentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Chronicles. Hence, you may also perceive the futility of your objection concerning the term greater and lesser prophets^*, as termed by Chris­tians [Page 187]in general, (though I suppose, they only mean the size of the books) but had you ever seen an Hebrew Bible, you would have known that there is no such thing in it, as lesser and greater pro­phets: as they are all included in the term latter prophets; and are enumerated thus, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve: because they are all included in one book, by the Jews. Are you not ashamed now of your misplaced wit? Alas! What a lamentable thing is ig­norance!

The book of Ruth, you call "an idle, bungling story, foolishly told about a strolling country girl creeping slily to bed to her cousin Boaz." Is this fair criticism? Is it truth? Does it appear so from histo­ry? On the contrary, we find that she was no strolling girl; and it is very base in you thus to traduce her character. She had been married ten years, and be­ing left a widow without children, and fully bent on renouncing the idolatry of her native country, she accompanied her mother in law, back to the land of Israel: there, her mother informed her of the [Page 188]right of redemption which she had, ac­cording to the law of Israel, among whom she was now incorporated. She therefore instructed her how to act, in order to break the matter to Boaz, and to claim his protection; for which reason, she laid herself down at the foot of her aged kins­man's bed, and rose up as innocent as she laid down, and with an high encomi­um on her virtuous^* behaviour. She was afterwards married to Boaz, and ac­knowledged by all her neighbours, nay, by all the city, to be a strictly virtuous woman and it is to be presumed, that they most certainly were better acquaint­ed with her character, than you possibly can be. As to its being called the word of God, hear what Aben Ezra says, "Be­cause David was the root of the kingdom of Israel, his genealogy was written in the sacred books."

You observe^†, "If Madam Esther thought it any honour to offer herself as a kept Mistress to Ahasuerus," &c, but pray Sir, where did you find that Esther [Page 189] offered herself? Not in the history I am sure: for according to the account there, "She was taken to the king's house, to the custody of Hagai, keeper of the wo­men^*." Whence, I apprehend, it was as much against her inclination to enter the king's seraglio, as it was yours to en­ter the Luxembourgh. And Aben Ezra asserts, "that she was seized by force." Thus also Jarchi (Vide in Loc). The book clearly points out the particular providence of God in the care of his pe­culiar people: and a manifest proof of its authenticity, is the celebration of the feast of Purim (in allusion to pur the lot) by the whole nation to this day^†, in com­memoration of the great and wonderful de­liverance which God wrought for them, by means of Esther and Mordecai.

I SHALL now proceed to take notice of what you observe concerning Isaiah, and the other prophets. You say^*, "Who­ever will take the trouble of reading the book ascribed to Isaiah, will find it one of the most wild and disorderly compositions ever put together: it is one continued, incoherent, bombastical rant, full of ex­travagant metaphor, without application, and destitute of meaning; a school boy would scarcely have been excusable for writing such stuff." I really know not which most to admire, your ignorance, or presumption. "Whoever will take the trouble," &c. I sir, have taken that trou­ble; nay, I have commented on a great part of it; (See my Dissertations on the prophecies vol. 1st. & IId.) and am allowed to have some little knowledge in the lan­guage [Page 191]in which it is written: but have not sound it to be "such stuff," as you assert it is. On the contrary, I have found the diction pure: the sentiments grand and sublime; and the imagery strong and beautiful. You compare, "the burden of Babylon, the burden of Moab, &c. to the story of the knight of the burning mountain," &c. But if you had read the burden of Babylon with attention, and compared it with its present state, as I have done, I doubt not but it would have made as strong an impression on your mind, as it has on mine; especially, if you consider that this prophecy was delivered near two hundred years before its com­pletion: and that the captivity of the Jews, for which the Babylonians were to be thus punished, did not fully take place till about one hundred and thirty years after the delivery of this prophecy: that the Medes, who are expressly mentioned (chap. xiii. 17.) as the principal agents in the overthrow of the Babylonish monar­chy, by which the Jews were released from that captivity, were at the time of the delivery of this prophecy, an inconsi­derable [Page 192]people; having been in a state of anarchy ever since the fall of the great Assyrian Empire, of which they formed a part, under Sardanapalus: and did not become a kingdom under Dejoces till a­bout the seventeenth year of Hezekiah. The exact completion of prophecies like these, plainly shew from whom the pro­phet received them; from him, to whom all things are known; he therefore, chal­lenges the false gods to come forth, and give evident demonstration of their fore­knowledge and power, by foretelling fu­ture events. "Let them approach, and tell us the things that shall happen; the things that shall first happen, what they are, let them tell us; and we will consider them; and we shall know the event; or declare to us things to come hereafter. Tell us the things that will come to pass in latter times: then shall we know, that ye are gods."^* In opposition to this, the true prophet of the true God, as an evi­dent proof of the truth of what he had predicted, says, "The former predictions, [Page 193]lo! they are come to pass: and new events I now declare: before they spring forth, I make them known unto you." This, Sir, is the test of prophecy; it is this that distinguishes the burden of Ba­bylon, the burden of Moab, &c. from those foolish tales that you ridiculously wish to compare them with. And, in truth, there cannot be a stronger or more convincing proof of the truth of prophe­cy, and the accomplishment of future e­vents so foretold, than this position: for if the former prophecies were exactly ful­filled, it is an earnest of the completion of the suture events so predicted. And yet, in defiance of such clear evidence, you assert, that the last verse of the for­ty fourth, and the beginning of the for­ty fifth chapters of Isaiah were written at least an hundred and fifty years after Isaiah was dead▪ and are^* a compliment to Cyrus, who permitted the Jews to re­turn to Jerusalem from the Babylonian captivity, to rebuild Jerusalem and the temple, as stated in Ezra." And as a proof [Page 194]of this, you quote these two verses; but herein you have acted very unfairly; for you ought to have began at verse 24th. of chapter xlivth, as it is there that the prophecy commences, "Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer; even he that form­ed thee from the womb: I am the Lord who maketh all things; who stretched out the heavens alone; who spread the firm earth by myself, I am He, who frustrateth the prognostics of the impos­tors, and maketh the diviners mad; who reverseth the devices of the sages, and infatuateth their knowledge: who esta­blisheth the word of his servant: and ac­complisheth the counsel of his messengers: who sayeth to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be inhabited, and to the cities of Judah, ye shall be built; and her desolate places I will restore." Thus he shews the return of the nation from the Babylonian capti­vity, according to his prediction; in oppo­sition to that of the prognosticaters and diviners; whose wisdom and counsel God frustrateth, but establisheth the word of his servant. In the next three verses, he shews the destruction of Babylon; the [Page 195]manner it is to be taken, and by whom. "Who sayeth to the deep, Be thou wast­ed; and I will make dry thy rivers:" By this figurative language, the prophet shews the taking of Babylon by Cyrus, who drained off the waters of the Euphrates, which ran through the city of Babylon, by means of which, he marched his troops by night along the bed of the river into the heart of the city,^* and surprised it. The prophet then shews by whom it should be thus conquered; and for what purpose: even for the sake of Israel, God's chosen servants; that all might know that Jeho­vah alone was God, and none else.—"Who sayeth to Cyrus, who is my shep­herd? and he shall fulfil all my pleasure: by saying to b^Jerusalem, Thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy founda­tions shall be laid. Thus saith the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus, whom I hold fast by the right hand: that I may sub­due nations before him; and ungird the loins of kings: that I may open before [Page 196]him the valves; and the gates shall not^* be shut. I will go before thee, and make the crooked places strait; the gates of brass will I break in pieces^†, and the bars of iron will I cut asunder. And I will give unto thee the treasures^‡ of [Page 197]darkness, and the stores deep hidden in secret places: that thou mayest know that I am the Lord; he that calleth thee by thy name is the God of Israel." By this, God shewed that it was not by his own power that Cyrus atchieved all his conquests, but by the divine assistance: and which Cyrus himself acknowledged; Ezra i. 2. "Thus saith Cyrus, king of Persia, the Lord God of heaven hath gi­ven me all the kingdoms of the earth;" &c. Not as Sennacherib, who said, "By the strength of my hand have I done it; and by my wisdom, for I am pru­dent^*;" &c. For which the prophet de­nounced [Page 198]his destruction; and which was fully accomplished. Nor yet like Nebu­chadnezzar, who said, "I will ascend aboye the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most high."^* For which blas­phemous expression, that dreadful sentence contained in the following verses was pro­nounced against him and his posterity: and which was likewise accomplished in every particular. But Cyrus was fully convinced, that he owed his victories to God, to whom alone he ascribed all his successes; more especially, as he was af­fined, that the God of Israel, had called him by name, near two hundred years be­fore his birth, that he might know that he was Jehovah, the God of Israel; and that he did not make him thus successful and victorious for his sake; but for the sake of his chosen Israel, as in ver. 4. &c. "For the sake of my servant Jacob, and of Israel, my chosen; I have even called thee by thy name; I have sirnamed thee, though thou hast not known me. I am the Lord, and none else; beside me there [Page 199]is no God: I have girded thee, though thou hast not know me. That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me: I am the Lord, and none else; Who form­eth the light, and createth darkness; who maketh peace, and createth evil: I, Jehovah, am the author of all these things." We now have a full view of the prophecy, the truth of which is prov­ed by its full completion in every particu­lar; so contrary to the pretended ora­cles and predictions delivered by the prog­nosticators, diviners, &c.—The prophet, in figurative language, also shews the manner in which Babylon was to be ta­ken; and that, though God had called Cyrus, and led him on to victory, &c. in such an extraordinary manner, yet it was not for his merit, for he knew not the Lord: but the sole end and purpose for which he was called, and thus exalt­ed, was for the sake of the God of Is­rael's chosen people; and that he might know that the Lord alone formed all things; contrary to the great principle of the Magian religion, which prevailed in [Page 200]Persia in the time of Cyrus, and in which he probably was educated, that there are two supreme, co-eternal, and independent causes, always acting in opposition to each other; one they called Light, who was the author of all good; the other they called Darkness, the author of all evil; that when the good being Light had the ascendancy, then good and hap­piness prevailed among men; and when Darkness had the superiority, then evil and misery abounded. In reference, therefore, to this absurd opinion, held by the person (Cyrus) to whom this prophe­cy is addressed, God by his prophet, in the most significant terms, asserts his om­nipotence and supremacy: "I am the Lord, and none else; Who formeth the light and createth darkness; who maketh peace and createth evil: I Jehovah am the author of all these things." Declar­ing that those powers, whom the Persians held to be the original authors of good and evil to mankind, representing them by light and darkness, as their proper em­blems, were no other than creatures of God, the instruments which he employs [Page 201]in his government of the world, ordained, or permitted by him, in order to execute his wise and just decrees; and that there is no power, either good or evil, indepen­dent of the one supreme God, infinite in power and in goodness. Now, is it possi­ble to conceive, that a captive Jew, in­tending to compliment Cyrus, the greatest prince in the world, should be so stupid, so devoid of all reason and common sense, as to tell him, that the victories he had atchieved, and the conquests he had ob­tained, were not the effect of his wisdom, prudence and valor; but were bestowed on him by the God of Israel: a God whom he did not know: and that they were not bestowed on him for his merit; because he did not worship God, as he did not know him; but for the sake of God's chosen people, that they, through his means, might be released from the captivity they were held in by the Baby­lonians; so that he was nothing more than a more instrument in the hands of that God which he knew not; and who also told him, that the Gods he worship­ped were no other than his creatures; [Page 202]and that his religion was all a lie. This, I must confess, was a pretty way indeed to compliment a great prince, such as Cyrus; but that it should procure from him the deliverance of the captives, as a thankful acknowledgement that he owed all his power and greatness to God's infi­nite goodness and power, is altogether in­credible: and whoever maintains such an absurdity, shews either a weak head or a bad heart.

As to what you say (p. 45.) of "the studied craft of scripture-makers, in mak­ing every part of this romantic book of school boy's eloquence, bend to the mon­strous idea of a son of God begotten by a ghost on the body of a virgin," &c. I have nothing to say, as it does not con­cern me in the defence of Isaiah: because, I am fully convinced, that the prophet never intended any such thing; as I have shewn at large, in my Letters to Dr. Coo­per, in answer to his, One great argument for the truth of Christianity from a single Prophecy.^* But, as you to attempt [...] [Page 203]prove from this passage, that Isaiah was "a lying prophet and an impostor," I shall briefly state the true intent and meaning of the prophecy; and shew that what he had predicted, was fully verified in every particular.

It must be observed, that before this confederacy of the two kings against the house of David, they each had warred separately against Judah; when Rezin first carried away a great multitude of them captive to Damascus; and after­wards the king of Israel also smote an hundred twenty thousand of them in one day: and carried away two hundred thou­sand of them captive; but although they were made captives, yet were they not retained in captivity; for the men of Is­rael being admonished by the Lord's pro­phet, the principal men, "rose up; and look the captives, and with the spoil cloth­ed all that were naked, among them, and arrayed them, and shod them, and gave them to eat and to drink, and anointed them, and carried all the feeble of them upon asses, and brought them to Jericho [Page 204]the city of the palm-trees,^* to their bre­thren, 2 Chron. xxviii. 15. But now that they formed a league together, not for the purpose of making captives, or taking of some cities; but with an intent of making an entire conquest of the kingdom of Ju­dah, destroy the house of David, and place another family on the throne; it says, they "went up towards Jerusalem, to war against it." For though when they came up separately against Judah, God suffered them as the instruments of his vengeance, for their manifold sins, to prevail against them: yet, when that un-natural confederacy of Israel with the uncircumcised was formed; and they plan­ned the total destruction of the royal house of David, God would by no means suffer it: they consequently could not prevail against it. And, because the house of David was so greatly moved at this formidable confederacy; (but which was not the case, when they came up sepa­rately, [Page 205]and therefore is not mentioned in Chronicles) God commanded Isaiah to go forth, and encourage Ahaz, by telling him that this scheme, "shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass." And as a proof of this, the prophet gave him the following sign. "Behold the young woman hath conceived,^* and beareth of son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Butter and ho­ney shall he eat, at his knowing^† to re­fuse the evil and chuse the good. For before the child shall know to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land shall be forsaken, which thou abhorrest be­cause of both its kings." This was fully accomplished, when the king of Assyria slew Rezin^‡ and Hosea the son of Elah slew Pekah^§ Thus was this prophecy [Page 206]fully verified in every particular: for the prophet declared by the command of God that the above mentioned purpose of the two kings, "shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass." I now ask you, Did it stand? Did it come to pass? Did they dethrone and destroy the royal-house of David? Was the son of Tabeal ever made king of Judah? No. On the con­trary, the two confederate kings were both cut off, before the child that was to be born, knew to refuse the evil, and choose the good, exactly as the prophet had predicted. Hence it is manifest, that the kings not only failed in their attempt, but were themselves cut off; while Ahas continued to reign over Judah, and was peaceably succeeded by his son Hezekiah. Pray, Sir, who is now the lying prophet and impostor? I will not say you have told a lie, but you have said the thing that is not true: and, therefore, think the following words of the prophet pecu­liarly applicable to you: Wo unto them who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and [Page 207]sweet for bitter. Wo unto them who are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own conceit^*."

You charge Jeremiah with "guarding his^† prognostications in such a crafty man­ner, as to leave himself a door to escape by," because he had said, that though God should denounce the destruction of a nation for its wickedness; yet, if that na­tion should repent, and return from its evil, the Lord would repent of the evil that he thought to do unto them; and vice versa. This you call "an absurd sub­terfuge,^‡—consistent with nothing but the stupidity of the Bible." But in my hum­ble opinion, it is highly instructive; for under the type of the potter's fashioning the vessel as he pleases, is shewn, God's absolute authority over all nations and kingdoms, to regulate and alter their con­dition at his own discretion; and that he rewards and punishes them according to their desert. It must therefore be consi­dered as a warning to all nations, to be careful not to commit evil in the sight of [Page 208]the Almighty; and likewise as an encon­ragement to those who have sinned, to avail themselves of God's mercy, to repent and turn from their evil way; as was actually the case of the Ninevites: and as is plain from the whole tenor of the history of the Hebrews.

You next bring forward an objection, which you have borrowed from Spinoza and others, concerning the disordered state of the book: but this does not affect the authenticity, nor the genuineness of the book of Jeremiah: for although the order of time may not be every where ob­served; yet may it be accounted for, in supposing that Ezza, or the men of the great synagogue, having found all the prophecies of Jeremiah separately, they collected them together into one book, without attending strictly to the order of their proper places: and yet this may not have been the effect of chance, but of some cause known to the prophet and them, though unknown to us; as the learned Abarbanal has observed on the xxxvth chapter, which contains a prophe­cy expressly said to be delivered in the [Page 209]days of Jehoiakim, and yet is placed after several that were delivered in the days of Zedekiah: but the reason of this, appears to be as follows. When Jeremiah had written the preceding prophecy, concern­ing their not suffering the bond-men and bond-women to go free according to the law of Moses,^* and for which he denoun­ced a severe sentence against them; he thought proper to place immediately after it, the prophecy concerning the Recha­bites, who strictly obeyed their father's injunction: and when he made trial of their obedience, and offered them wine to drink, they refused it; alledging the ex­press prohibition of their father. By which, the prophet had an opportunity of placing the disobedience of the Jews to the divine command, in a much stronger point of view; by contrasting it with the obe­dience that the Rechabites paid to their father's command; and as is plain from the words of the prophet, ver. 13, 14, 15. "Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; go and say unto the men of [Page 210]Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, Will ye not receive instruction to hearken to my words? saith the Lord. The words of Jonadab the son of Rechab, which he gave in charge to his sons, not to drink wine, have been punctually per­formed, &c. But ye have not hearkened unto me," &c. Then follows the severe sentence which God had pronounced a­gainst them for their disobedience, con­trasted with the reward he promised to bestow on the Rechabites for their obedi­ence. In this manner, all the seeming disorder in the arrangement of the book, might probably be accounted for.

You also charge (p. 52.) the prophet, or the book, it is all the same, with contra­diction, because two different accounts are given of his imprisonment: but if you had attended to the different accounts with a candid eye, in order to come at truth, you would have found, that they recorded two different imprisonments; as nothing can be more obvious than that he was twice imprisoned:^* first, in the house of [Page 211] Jonathan the scribe, as mentioned chap. xxxvii. 15. and-from which he was libe­rated by Zedekiah, to the court of the prison, and had by his order a stated al­lowance of bread, until all the bread in the city was spent: and for having pub­licly predicted the destruction of Jerusa­lem, he was a second time imprisoned in the dungeon of Malchijah the king's son; whence he was freed by the intercession of Ebed-melech, as mentioned chap. 38.

The different names in the twenty-first and thirty-eighth chapters, plainly shew that they were different events; the one, giving an account of those that were sent with the message from Zedekiah; the o­ther, of those that heard him declare to the people the destruction of Jerusalem: and so far from the conference breaking off abruptly, at the tenth verse of the twenty-first chapter, that it is continued to the end of the chapter: for from verse the third to verse seventh, he answers the [Page 212]king; from verse the eighth to the tenth, he speaks to the people; and from verse the eleventh to the end, to the house of the king of Judah.

You observe (p. 51) "But the instance in the last chapter (the lii.) is still more glaring;" because it contains an account of the destruction of Jerusalem, which had been already mentioned; but this objection is so futile, that I should not have taken notice of it, were it not to ex­pose its absurdity; and to let your admir­ers see what a profound critic you are in sacred literature; for it is universally al­lowed^* to have been added by some one after Jeremiah's time, probably by Ezra and the men of the great synagogue, who revised the sacred writings, and collected them into one body; as is plain from the text. Thus far (are) the words of Jere­miah. And which was, to distinguish the preceding prophecies from what follows: which is nearly the same word for word, as it is recorded in the second book of Kings, chap. xxiv. 18—20, and ch. xxv. [Page 213]together with some few additions. And the reason of its being placed here, was to shew, the complete and exact accom­plishment of the predictions of Jeremiah concerning the Jewish nation: and the truth of the divine word of prophecy.

I now proceed to take notice of a mat­ter of greater importance; namely, your charge against Jeremiah for his duplicity. That we may have a clear view of the force of your objection, it is necessary to observe that Jeremiah, on account of his having publicly predicted the destruction of Jerusalem, had been cast by the prin­ces of Judah, who sought his life, into a miry dungeon, as above shewn; and where he certainly would have perished, had not Ebed-melech taken compassion on him, and spoken to the king in his fa­vour, saying, "My lord, the king, these men have done evil in all that they have done to Jeremiah the prophet, whom they have caused to be thrown into the dungeon: and he is like to die for hun­ger in the place where he is." On this representation, the king ordered Jeremiah to be taken out of the dungeon; and, [Page 214]shortly after, sent for him privately (See verse 14.), and desired him to conceal nothing from him; at the same time binding himself by an oath, that, what­ever the nature of his prophecy might be, he would not put him to death, nor de­liver him into the hands of those men (the princes) that sought his life. Jeremiah then shewed him God's purpose respect­ing the fate of Jerusalem. When the conference was ended, the king, mindful of his oath to preserve the life of the prophet, dismissed him, saying, "Let no man know of these words, and thou shalt not die. But if the princes hear that I have talked with thee, and they come un­to thee, and say unto thee, Declare unto us now what thou hast said unto the king, hide it not from us, and we will not put thee to death; also what the king said unto thee: then shalt thou say unto them, I presented my supplication before the king, that he would not cause me to re­turn to Jonathan's house to die there. Then came all the princes to Jeremiah, and asked him, and he told them accord­ing to all these words that the king had [Page 215]commanded." On this, you observe (p. 52) "Thus, this man of God, as he is called, could tell a lie, or very strongly prevaricate,—for certainly he did not go to Zedekiah to make his supplica­tion; neither did he make it." But you certainly mistake, sir; it is not said that he went to make his supplication, but that he presented it. And as it is men­tioned in the preceding chapter, that, in the conference with the king, he did make supplication to him, it is very probable that in this conference he renewed it: especially as we find that he continued in the court of the prison: but be this as it may, I contend that Jeremiah did not prevaricate nor tell a lie on this occasion: he acted as every honest, prudent man would have done in his situation. He knew these men were his enemies, and sought his life; he, therefore, was un­der no obligation to tell the whole matter to such men; he told them the truth in part, to save his life; and that was suffi­cient. Moreover the king had command­ed him what he should say, and particu­larly charged him to let no man know [Page 216]what had passed between them: he, there­fore, as an obedient and dutiful subject, thought it his bounden duty to do as the king had commanded him: if he had not you would have accused him of betraying the king's confidence; especially as you have already affixed a suspicion on him of his being a traitor.

But your next charge is of a still more serious nature, for you accuse Jeremiah of delivering false predictions. "In the xxxivth chapter" you say, (p. 53) "is a prophecy of Jeremiah to Zedekiah in these words," ver. 2.—'Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will give this city into the hands of the king of Babylon, and will burn it with fire: and thou shalt not escape out of his hand, but thou shalt surely be taken, and delivered into his hand; and thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the king of Babylon, and he shall speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon. Yet hear the word of the Lord, O Zedekiah, king of Judah, thus saith the Lord, thou shalt not die by the sword, but thou shalt die in peace; and with the burn­ings of thy fathers, the former kings that [Page 217]were before thee, so shall they burn odours for thee, and will lament thee, saying, Ah, lord! for I have pronounced the word, saith the Lord.'

"Now, instead of Zedekiah behold­ing the eyes of the king of Babylon, and speaking with him mouth to mouth, and dying in peace, and with the burning of odours, as at the funeral of his fathers (as Jeremiah hath declared the Lord him­self had pronounced), the reverse, ac­cording to the lii. chapter, was the case: it is there said, ver. 10. 'That the king of Babylon flew the sons of Zedekiah before his eyes; then he put out the eyes of Zedekiah, and bound him in chains, and carried him to Babylon, and put him in prison till the day of his death."— "What then can we say of these pro­phets, but that they are impostors and liars?" I can say, that there is not a word of truth in all that you have advan­ced; for the prophecy was sulfilled in e­very particular, as will be seen, by com­paring the words of the prophecy with the history.

[Page 218] THE PROPHECY.

"I will give this city into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall burn it with fire. And thou shalt not escape out of their hands, but shalt surely be taken and delivered into his hand. And thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the king of Babylon, and he shall speak with thee mouth to mouth.— And thou shalt go to Babylon. Yet hear the word of the Lord, O Zedekiah, king of Judah: Thus saith the Lord of thee, Thou shalt not die by the sword, but thou shalt die in peace: and with the burnings of thy fa­thers, so shall they burn odours for thee.

THE HISTORY.

"Came Nebuza­radan, captain of the guard, into Jerusa­lem, and he burnt the house of the Lord, and the king's house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and all the houses of the great men burnt he with fire. But the army of the Chal­deans pursued after the king, and over­took Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho: and all his army was scattered from him. Then they took the king, and carried him up unto the king of Babylon to Riblah; where he gave judg­ment upon him. And the king of Baby­lon slew the sons of [Page 219]Zedekiah before his eyes: Then he put out: the eyes of Ze­dekiah; and the king of Babylon bound him in chains, and carried him to Baby­lon, and put him in prison, still the day of his death." Ch. lii. 8—13.2 King. xxv. 5—9. See also 2 Chron. xxxvi. 19.

Hence it is manifest, that Zedekiah did see the eyes of the king of Babylon, when he slew the sons of Zedekiah before his eyes; and spake judgments^* with him: that is, he upbraided him with the perfidy of his revolt against him; as he had sworn by God to him (See 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13.): for which he put out his eyes^† and carried him to Baby­lon, [Page 220]where he died in peace, as the pro­phet had predicted. He did not die in battle: neither was he put to a violent or shameful death: he died a natural death on his bed, though in a prison. Thus we see how the prophecy and history a­gree, and shew the full completion of the prophecy. And now, sir, what can we say of those who call Jeremiah a liar and impostor, but that they are base calum­niators?

You also assert^*, that Jeremiah joined himself afterwards to Nebuchadnezzar, and went about prophesying for him a­gainst the Egyptians; Thus much for another of these lying prophets. But where did you find this? Surely not in the narrative that we have of these trans­actions: for there it is said, "And the captain of the guards took Jeremiah, and said unto him, the Lord thy God hath [Page 221]denounced this calamity against this place (no small compliment to the truth of the prophet's predictions). If it seem good unto thee to come with me to Babylon, come, and I will set mine eyes upon thee." But he declined accepting this kind and friendly offer of Nebuzaradan; and with a disinterestedness, and true patriotism, (which perhaps you would have admired in any other man but a prophet) he re­turned to his distressed brethren, and when they were determined to go down to Egypt, he endeavoured to prevent them: telling them, according to the word of the Lord, that if they went thi­ther, the sword of which they were a­fraid should overtake, them there in the land of Egypt, and they should die there: because they dissembled when they sent him to enquire for them of God, "say­ing, Pray for us unto the Lord our God; and according to all that the Lord our God shall say, so declare unto us, and we will do. But ye have not hearkened unto the voice of the Lord your God,—Now, therefore, ye shall know assuredly [Page 222]that by the sword, and by famine, and by pestilence shall ye die in the place whi­ther ye desire to go to sojourn (Jerem. xlii. 20.22.)." But they still persisting in going to Egypt, forced Jeremiah along with them. There indeed he prophesied against the Egyptians, (as in their de­struction, the Jews that were in Egypt were included;) and also against several other nations, particularly against the Ba­bylonians, without the least regard or at­tention to or from Nebuchadnezzar; and which is a plain proof of the falsity of your change against the prophet; whilst the exact accomplishment of these pro­phecies are an evident demonstration of the truth of Jeremiah's prophetic spirit.

You say (p. 54.) "In the former part of the Age of Reason, I have said that the word prophet was the Bible word for poet. I am sufficiently justified in this o­pinion, not only because the books called the prophecies are written in poetical lan­guage, but because there is no word in the Bible except it be the word prophet, that describes what we mean by a poet."—I suppose then, sir, that you are perfectly [Page 223]acquainted with the Hebrew, and know that there is no word for poet in that language, but [...] Nabee, which is al­ways translated a prophet. Well, and what then is the word for poem in the Hebrew? It must certainly be [...] Ne­buah: but [...] denotes a prophecy, and not a poem. [...] Sheer, Sir, is the pro­per word for poem in the Hebrew: whence is derived [...] Mes [...]aerear, a poet. It must also be observed, that the word [...] a prophet, is never applied to any but such as were sent to the people to admo­nish and instruct them; for [...] is pro­perly derived from [...] the fruit of the lips (Isaiah lvii. 19.). And, there­fore, Moses says in Deut. xviii. 15.—"The Lord thy God will raise up unto you [...] a prophet as I am from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, unto him ye shall hearken:" and ver. 18. "I will raise them up [...] a prophet from among their brethren, as thou art, and I will put my words in his mouth," &c. " [...] A prophet unto the nations have I constituted thee." (Jerm. i. 5.) "And the Lord said unto me, Go, [...] prophesy unto my [Page 224]people," (Amos vii. 15.) Whence if is manifest that the word [...] properly de­notes a messenger sent with a prophesy; and which is the reason that the book of Daniel, though it contains prophecies of the utmost importance; many of which have been so exactly fulfilled; that infidels have asserted, that the facts were prior to the predictions: yet it is placed among the Hagiographical books, and not among the prophetic: as I have shewn at large in Lingua Sacra, Radix [...] and where I have also shewn the true meaning of the words [...] Roeeh and [...] Choezeh; both of which in English denote a Seer; and applied to such as saw a vision of God, but were not sent with any message to the people, &c. From all which it is plain, that your criticism is false and fallacious; owing to your extreme ignorance of the subject you pretend to treat of; and which must ever render you contemptible in the eyes of every discerning reader. Alas! how are the mighty fallen!

Your illiberal abuse of the prophets and prophecies, (P. 54. 55.) the former of whom you call "poetical-musical con­juring-dreaming-strowling-gentry;" [Page 225]and the latter you compare to "fortune-tel­ling, casting nativities, predicting riches, fortunate or unfortuate marriages, conju­ring for lost goods," &c. plainly shews, that you either have mistaken their office and character, or what is worse, wilfully misrepresent them: for their office was, to deliver to the nation, the commands of (God, his promises and threatenings; and to admonish them to return to their duty, as the prophet says, "And I have sent unto you all my servants, the prophets, rising up early and sending, saying, Re­turn I pray you, every one from his evil way, and amend your doings," &c. (Jer. xxxv. 15. besides several other passages in the same prophet of the like import.) In the execution of this duty, they were frequently persecuted; and which, these holy men had foreseen and expected as the reward of their labours; and there­fore, we generally see them take this pain­ful and weighty office on them very re­luctantly, and at last accept it merely in obedience to the repeated orders of hea­ven. But, as soon as they had accepted [Page 226]it, and the burden of the word was laid on them, they boldly issued forth before kings and people; upbraiding them for their idolatry and their crimes; and then, neither exile, nor chains, nor dungeons, could silence their noble indignation: but they sustained all with the utmost forti­tude.

You next charge the prophets with be­ling party men; and observe (p. 55.) "This party prophesying shewed itself immediately on the separation of the first two rival kings, Rehoboam and Jeroboam. The prophet that cursed, or prophesied against the altar that Jeroboam had built in Bethel, was of the party of Judah, where Rehoboam was king; and he was way laid on his return home by a prophet of the party of Israel, who said unto him, (2 King chap. xiii.) 'Art thou the man of God that came from Judah? and be said I am." Then the prophet of the party of Israel said to him, 'I am a prophet also as thou art, (signifying of Judah) and an angel spake unto me by the word of the Lord, saying, Bring him back with thee unto thine house, that he may eat bread and [Page 227]drink water: but, says the 18th verse, he lied unto him."

"The event, however, according to the story, is, that the prophet of Judah ne­ver got back to Judah; for he was found dead on the road, by the contrivance of the prophet of Israel, who no doubt was called a true prophet by his own party; and the prophet of Judah a lying pro­phet." This charge is a most abomina­ble falsehood, and plainly shews your depravity of heart. Was Shemaiah who admonished Rehoboam to desist from go­ing to war with Jeroboam, because the thing was from God, a party prophet▪ And if the prophet that came from Ju­dah was a party prophet, and not a true prophet of God, how could he so exactly foretel what Josiah was to do on the altar upwards of three hundred and fifty years after? And how came king Jeroboam's had, which he stretched out to lay hold of the man of God, to be instantly dried up, and the altar rent, according to what he had predicted? These things you have thought proper not to mention, (an evi­dent proof of your candor.) But you say, [Page 228]"the prophet of Judah was killed by the contrivance of the prophet of Israel." Do you think then, that the prophet of the party of Israel, was a master of wild beasts, and kept lions to destroy the pro­phets of the party of Judah? Indeed, he must have been an admirable fellow, that could train his lions in such a manner, as that they should slay the man and not kill the beast, nor devour the carcass of the prophet (ver. 28.) To be serious, does not the death of the prophet, and the subsequent behaviour of the lion, teach us, that the prophet was slain by the ex­press command of God, as it was foretold? But that which flatly contradicts your as­sertion is, the prophet of Israel's fair, open, and candid acknowledgment, that the prophet of Judah (as you call him, though without the least shadow of truth, as I shall shew in my comment on scrip­ture) was a true prophet of God, not a lying prophet, as you basely and falsely assert. Hear his charge to his sons, and take shame to yourself, for having thus vilified the true servants of God. "When I am dead, then bury me in the sepulchre [Page 229]wherein the man of God is buried; lay my bones beside his bones. For the say­ing which he cried by the word of the Lord against the altar in Bethel, and a­gainst all the houses of the high places, which are in the cities of Samaria, shall surely come to pass." Compare this with 2 King. chap. xxiii. 16—19. and you will be convinced, how exactly this prophecy was fulfilled in every particular.

Jehoshaphat king of Judah, Jehoram king of Israel, and the king of Edom, being engaged in a war against the king of Moab, you observe (p. 56.), "the story says, they were in great distress for water, upon which Jehoshaphat said, 'Is there not a prophet of the Lord, that we may enquire of the Lord by him?' The story then says, that these three kings went down to Elisha (an high honour in­deed for one of your conjurors), and when Elisha (who as I said, was a Judah-mite prophet) saw the king of Israel, he said unto him, 'What have I to do with thee, get thee to the prophets of thy father, and to the prophets of thy mother. As the Lord of hosts liveth, before whom I stand, surely, were it not that I regard the pre­sence of Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, I would [Page 230]not look towards thee, nor see thee.' Here is all the venom and vulgarity of a party prophet." And here sir, is all the venom and vulgarity of an ignorant, impertinent, profane scoffer. What! Elisha a Judah-mite prophet! Ha! ha! My good friend, you must go to school: Elisha a Judah-mite! Was Ab [...]lmaholah, the birth place of Elisha, (1 Kings xix. 16.) in the king­dom of Judah? Was Samaria, where the prophet generally resided, (2 King. v. iii. xi. 32. &c.) in the kingdom of Judah? Was Elisha a Judah-mite party prophet, when he discovered to the king of Israel the secret counsels of the king of Syria against him? Did he ever prophecy in, or concerning the kingdom of Judah? On the contrary, was he not always looked upon as the prophet of Israel? Did he not order one of the sons of the prophet to anoint Jehu king of Israel? And when E­lisha lay on his death bed, it was not the king of Judah that came to him, but the king of Israel that came to see him; "And wept over his face, and said, O my father, my father! the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof." (2 Kings xiii. 14.) This plainly shews that the king consider­ed him, not only as a true prophet, but as the principal prophet in Israel.

[Page 231] "Now for the prophecy;" you say, p. 56. Thus saith the Lord, make this val­ley full of ditches; which was just telling them what every countryman might have told them, without either fiddle or farce, that the way to get water was to dig for it." But this buffoonery,

is not a true representation of the case; for the ditches were not dug to get water by digging for it, but that they might hold the water when, "without wind or rain," it should miraculously come from another country; and "behold there came wa­ter by the way of Edom, and the country was filled with water." Thus was the prophecy fully accomplished."

As to what you say concerning Elisha's cursing the little children, which you have borrowed from Voltaire^*, I must observe, that the Hebrew word [...] translated children, properly denotes lads, youths, &c. and is frequently used to denote per­sons arrived at years of discretion: as in Gen. xxxvii. 2. xli. 12. xlv. 20. &c. 1 Sam. xxv. 5-9. &c. &c. As to the term [...] here added, and translated [Page 232] little, it is also used in Hebrew to denote low, &c. so that the proper sense is youths of a low degree: i. e. worthless young fellows. This will more plainly appear, when it is considered that Bethel was the idolatrous city, where the priests of Baal ministred to the calves of Jeroboam; and as they had heard of the ascent of Elijah, and of Elisha's succeeding him; they sent their disciples in derision of them both, to to mock Elisha; by saying, "Go up, thou bald head," &c. for as Elijah was known by the description of "an hairy man," (2 King. i. 8.) they, to deride him, said, "Go up," &c. that is, thou who art bald, why dost thou not ascend to where thy master the hairy man is gone? Seeing them thus deride both him and his master, he, as the Lord's pro­phet, jealous for the honour of God, and his servants, cursed them; and has he not acted justly, his curse would not have effected the destruction of the offend­ers; but God, who knew that they de­served death, miraculously sent the bears to destroy them, at the word of the pro­phet. This is the true state of the case: and plainly shews how unjust is your illi­beral and scurrilous abuse of this prophet, [Page 233]by calling him a conjuror, a curser, and a liar.

The books of Ezekiel and Daniel you allow to be genuine; but in order to dis­credit the authority of these books, you have formed a strange and monstrous hy­pothesis, for which there is not the least foundation in those books. You suppose (p. 58.) that the dreams and visions of Ezekiel and Daniel were not revelations from God, but a pretended, enigmatical correspondence relative to the recovery of their country from the Babylonian yoke. You also suppose (p. 59.) that for men si­tuated as Ezekiel and Daniel were, "scarcely any thing could be more absurd than to suppose that such men should find nothing to do, but that of employing their time and their thoughts about what was to happen to other nations, a thousand or two thousand years after they should be dead." Then you suppose that men might take up the prophetic office when they pleased, as they do any other trade or call­ing; and then lay it down again when they pleased; but this, every reader of the Old Testament knows to be false; for those that were called to the prophetic office, had no choice; they were obliged to obey [Page 234]God's command, as above shewn. This is a manifest proof of your consummate igno­rance and impudence; and indeed, these suppositions are altogether so absurd, that it is scarcely credible, that any man in his senses, who had ever so little regard to his reputation, as an impartial inquirer after truth, should adopt such an hypothesis: or that he should have so little respect for his readers as to obtrude it on the world. Surely sir, you must have considered your readers as no better than heads of onions, when you wrote this; no wonder then, if indignation should prompt the discerning reader to cry out,

You say, p. 60. "that Ezekiel, speaking of Egypt, chap. xxix. ver. 11. says, 'No foot of man shall pass through it, nor foot of beast shall pass through it: neither shall it be inhabited for forty years.' This is what never came to pass, and consequently it is false, as all the books I have already re­viewed are." But this did come to pass, according to the figurative language of the prophet; for the expression of the foot of man or beast passing through, denoted the [Page 235]great desolation, that was to be brought on it: and that its trade, which was then carried on by caravans as it is at present, should be totally destroyed for forty years, and which was fully accomplished, as the learned Abarbanal has shewn; for from the time that Nebuchadnezzar^* conquered E­gypt till the ruin of the Babylonian em­pire, was forty years. And had you taken the pains to have looked a verse or two beyond where you quoted from, you would have seen the sequel to this prophecy, ver. 14, 15. "And they shall be there a low kingdom. It shall be the lowest of the king­doms; neither shall it exalt itself any more above the nations: that they rule not over the nations." This you may perhaps call an enigmatical dream, or a vision about the recovery of Ezekiel's country: or say downright, "it is a lie." But every can­did, impartial person, will no doubt esteem it a wonderful prophecy; for though it is [Page 236]upwards of two thousand years since the delivery of it, yet hath it been fulfilling from that time to this; as Egypt has in general been tributary and in subjection to strangers; for it was first conquered by the Baby lonians under Nebuchadnezzar; and afterwards by the Persians under Cy­rus, Cambyses, &c. After the Persians, it became subject to the Macedonians; and afterwards to the Romans, then to the Saracens, and then to the Mamalucs: and now is a province of the Tunkish empire. This is proved from Herodoms, Xenophon, &c. See Newton on the proph. Differ. 12.

Your profane jest concerning Jonah and the great fish^*, scarcely deserves an an­swer; but, as you attempt to ridicule the prophets, and blacken their character through Jonah, it is necessary to say a few words, in order to clear Jonah's charac­ter from that foul aspersion which you have cast on it.

[Page 237] It is well known that Assyria, of which Nineveh was the capitol, was ordained to destroy the kingdom of Israel, and to carry the nation captive; it was therefore called the rod of God's anger; "Ho! to the Assyrian, the rod of mine anger," (Isai. x. 5.) This Jonah knew, and therefore determined within himself not to go on this mission, that the Assyrians might not escape the punishment due to their crimes, through his means, as he would then be accessary to the destruction of his own nation; this affected him great­ly; and induced him to withdraw from the holy land, and attempt to suppress his mission; chusing rather to suffer death than in any wise be instrumental to the ruin of his nation, by saving the Assyri­ans; and which proceeded from his pub­lic^* spirit, and love of the nation; and not from "the malevolent spirit of a Bi­ble-prophet." This was the cause of his grief throughout the whole of this busi­ness (as I shall shew at large in my com­ment on the Old Testament); and there­fore he said, "O Lord, take, I beseech [Page 238]thee, my life from me:" As I have now performed my mission, and find that they are to be spared to be the instruments of thy vengeance against my nation; I be­seech thee to take my life from me; "for it is better for me to die than to live," and see the destruction that is to be bro't on my people. The instruction that we receive from this story is truly great; as it shews us the benefit of true repemance from the Ninevites; and the frailty of all human enjoyments from Jonah's gourd; as will be shewn in the aforementioned comment.

Your nonsensical observation on the prayer of Jonah is ‘—"light as chaff that floats before the wind."’ and therefore merits not a reply. Your balderdash about the "satire and the mo­ral of the fable," is nought

You conclude your illiberal abuse of the Old Testament in a style of the utmost self-importance, "I have now gone thro' the Bible (here, good Sir, you mistake the Old Testament for the Bible) as a man would go through a wood with an axe on his shoulder, and fell trees. Here they lie; and the priests, if they can, [Page 239]may replant them. They may, perhaps, stick them in the ground, but they will never make them grow." And do you really think so highly of your perform­ance as to imagine that you have thereby demolished the authority of the Old Tes­tament? Is it possible you can be so infa­tuated, as to suppose that you have by such a compound of ignorance, absurdity and nonsense, been able to effect what Mor­gan, Tindal, Bolingbroke, Hume, Vol­taire, Spinoza and other infidels, have not been able to effect, with all their wit and learning? How ridiculous! No, sir; you have not effected it. I will tell you what you have done: you have in a most unbe­coming manner, ridiculed that which was held most sacred; and basely calumniated characters esteemed most venerable; you have revived the scoffs of the profane, and increased the doubts of those who waver­ed. This, and more you have done in going through the Old testaments but you have taken no notice of the design God had in view, in choosing a people, not for their own sakes, but that they might hand down through all ages the knowledge of his ex­istence, his unity and partioular providence. To this end, God revealed his law to all [Page 240]Israel, in the presence of the whole nation. In this law he set before them in plain terms, the reward of their obedience, and the dreadful punishment they were to ex­pect in case of disobedience. These they experienced alternately as they obeyed or disobeyed the Lord's command; till at length, for their wickedness they were cast out from off the goodly land which the Lord had given them; their whole polity and government totally destroyed; and themselves dispersed all over the face of the earth, as Moses had told them upwards of three thousand years ago. But notwith­standing this dispersion, and all the dread­ful calamities which have accompanied it, yet have they been miraculously preserv­ed, as Moses had told them; (as shewn at large in the former part of these letters) and which was corroborated by the other prophets. It is the wonderful accom­plishment of these predictions, that hath established the truth and verity of these books: and caused them to be handed down to us for so many centuries, with re­spect and veneration; and which they ever will retain, in defiance of the utmost malice of deists and insidels, till time shall be no more.