[Page]
[Page]

Mr. Winthrop's LECTURE ON EARTHQUAKES.

[Page]

A LECTURE ON EARTHQUAKES;

Read in the Chapel of Harvard-College in Cambridge, N. E. November 26th 1755.

On Occasion of the great EARTHQUAKE which [...]hook NEW-ENGLAND the Week before.

By John Winthrop, Esq Hollisian Professor of the Mathematics and Philosophy at Cambridge.

Published by the general Desire of that Society.

Subterraneous caverns and vulcanos, if well considered, will be found to be wise contrivances of the Creator, serving to great uses of the Globe, and end of GOD's government. In all probability, these things may minister unto many secret, grand functions and operations of nature in the bowels of the earth.Dr. DERHAM'S Physico-Theol.

BOSTON; NEW-ENGLAND: Printed and Sold by Edes & Gill, at their Printing-Office next to the Prison in Queen-Street. 1755.

[Page]

A LECTURE On EARTHQUAKES.

YOU may justly expect, that the great EARTHQUAKE, which so lately a spread terror, and threatened desolation throughout New-England, should take me off from my stated course of lectures, to inquire into the probable causes of so formidable a phaenomenon. The subject is curious, and at present engages the attention of many persons; and the discussion of it may help to extend your views.

An Earthquake, you all know, is an agitation or shaking of some considerable part of the earth, and that by natural causes; in contradistinction to the shaking of a small part of it by artifi­cial methods. The degrees of this shaking are very various;—from the small jarrings, which are but just perceptible, to those violent [...]uccu [...]ions, which have altered the face of whole c [...]un­tri [...]s. [Page 6] These shakings are for the most part (I believe, always) praeceded or attended by an hollow rumbling noise, something like what is called heavy thunder; which is usually greater or less, according to the degree of the shake. Naturalists have distin­gui [...]hed earthquakes into two kinds; one, when the motion is horizontal, or from side to side; the other, when it is perpendi­cular, or right up and down. This distinction may, for what I know, be just; and yet perhaps earthquakes more commonly consist in a kind of undulatory motion, which may include both the others. For as a wave of water, when raised to it's greatest height, subsides, and in subsiding spreads itself horizontally; so in like manner, a wave of earth, if I may be allowed the ex­pression, must in it's descent partake both of an horizontal and perpendicular motion at the same time. And for the same rea­son, it must have had both these motions in it's ascent; but those particles, which had been carried forward in one direction in the ascent, will return in a contrary direction in the descent. This has been evidently found to be the case in the more violent earthquakes; and probably the reason why it has not been uni­versally found so, was, the difficulty of distinguishing these two motions from one another, when each of them has been but small. Though the ancient AEgyptians and Ch [...]ld [...]ans are said to have been able to foretell earthquakes, yet it is very certain, from all the accounts we have, that these agitations of the earth do no where observe any order or regular period in their returns; but at sometimes, recur more frequently; at others, after longer intermissions. If therefore they pretended to foretell them at all, they must have done it, not from any knowledge they had of their nature and causes; but only by the vain arts of judicial a [...]trology;—a kind of learning, it seems, which, f [...]tile as it is, was held in high repute among them. No countries, of which we have any knowledge, are exempt from these agitations; but some are more subject to them than others; and it is observable, that those which abound most with combustible minerals, as fo [...]ile coals, [...]ulphur, nitre, &c. are the most exposed to them. Many of these countries, too, have certa [...]n mountains called vul­canos, which are almost perpetually burning, and throwing out [Page 7] fire, and smoke, and ashes; their entrails probably consisting chiefly of such sort of minerals. It is observed, however, that about the time of an earthquake in those places, these vulcano [...] rage more furiously, projecting stones and cinders to a great height in the air; and pouring out whole rivers of liquid fire, which carry such a devastation, wherever they run, as no human art can either prevent or repair. Several such there are in the M [...]lucca islands in the East-Indies, almost under the [...]quinocti­al; and Iceland, under the polar circle, has four or five, besides the noted Hecla. Vesuvio near Naples is very remarkable; but there is none more famous than that in Sicily, now known there by the name of Monte Gibello, as it was formerly by that of AEtna; whose eruptions VIRGIL has described in so picturesque a manner, that I cannot forbear repeating a few lines from him.

—Horrificis juxta [...]onat AEtna ruinis:
Interdumque atram p [...]orumpit ad aethera nubem,
Turbine fumantem piceo et candente favilla;
Attollitque globo [...] flammarum, et [...]idera lambit.
Interdum scopulo [...] avul [...]aque viscera montis
Erigit eruct [...]ns, [...]quefactaque [...]axa [...]ub auras
Cum gemi [...]u glomerat, fundoque exae [...]tuat imo.

AEneid. III. 571. [...]eqq.

This description b of these phaenomena is perhaps not exceeded by any extant; except by those passages in the holy scriptures which ascribe these effects, as true philosophy does all those [Page 8] which we call natural effects, to the agency of GOD. It is [...] ‘who removeth the mountains, and they know not; who [...] them in his anger; who shaketh the earth out of [...], and the pillars thereof tremble.’ ‘HE looketh on [...], and it trembleth; HE toucheth the hills, and they [...] ‘The pillars of heaven tremble, and are astonished at [...] proof.’ Nothing can equal the sublimity, the gran­deur o [...] these images. But to proceed.

That the earth has been, in all ages, and in most parts of it, subject to these agitations, history affords us but too many proofs. It is not, however, my design to enter into a detail of the dismal events of this sort, left upon record. I shall only extract from authentic accounts a few of the most striking particulars, in order to give you some idea of the dire effects, which such convulsions of the earth are capable of producing.

Imagine then the earth trembling with a huge thundering noise, or heaving and swelling like a rolling sea:—now gaping in chasms of various sizes, and then immediately closing again; either swallowing up the unhappy persons who chanced to be over them, or crushing them to death by the middle:—from some, spouting up prodigious quantities of water to a vast height, or belching out hot, offensive and suffocating exhalations; while others are streaming with torrents of melted minerals:—some houses moving out of their places; others cracking and t [...]mbling into heaps of rubbish; and others again, not barely by whole streets, but by whole cities at a time, sinking down­right to a great depth in the earth, or under water:—on the shore, the sea roaring and rising in billows; or else retiring to a great distance from the land, and then violently returning like a flood to overwhelm it; vessels driven from their anchors; some overset and lost, others thrown up on the land:— [...]n one place, vast rocks slung down from mountains, and ch [...]ki [...]g up rivers, which, being then forced to find themselves new [...], sweep away such trees, houses, &c. as had escaped the fury of the shock; in another, mountains themselves sinking in a moment, and their places [...] by pools of water:—some people run­ning about pale, with fear, trembling for the event, and ignorant [Page 9] whither to fly for shelter; others thrown with violence down on the ground, not being able to keep on their feet; and others shrieking or groaning in the agonies of death:—even the brute creation manifesting all the signs of consternation and astonish­ment:—Imagine these things to yourselves, and you will then have a view, though but an imperfect one, of some of those images of horror and desolation, which accompany the more vi­olent earthquakes.

But I will dwell no longer on these tragical scenes. Those of you, who are desirous of farther information, may meet with it in the Philosophical Transactions; c particularly in the accounts of those horrible earthquakes, which almost desolated the islands of Ja­maica and Sicily. 63 years ago; in the latter of which it was computed, that about 60,000 persons perished; which was very near one quarter of the whole number of inhabitants. To re­lieve you and my self under such melancholy prospects, I will turn my thoughts to the theory of these most formidable phaeno­mena, as soon as I have made two or three observations on the earthquakes we lately felt.

GOD be thanked, all earthquakes are not formidable in so high a degree. Those of New-England, in particular, which have indeed greatly and justly alarm'd the inhabitants, have never destroyed them. For tho' this country, we know, has been visited with earthquakes from it's first settlement by the English; yet, so far as my information reaches, not a single life has been lost by any of them; and perhaps never so much damage done to our buildings as by the last great shock: As to which I would observe.

First, That it certainly began with an undulation of the earth, as I have been assured by some who were then awake; tho' I think it would not have been easily concluded from the effects, that the earth had had any other than an horizontal motion; those effects which were generally taken notice of, being chiefly, if not only, such, as a perpendicular motion would not, but an horizontal one would, have produced. Such, for instance, were the dashing of liquors over the sides of open vessels; the over­setting [Page 10] setting many things in houses; and the throwing of bricks from off the tops of chimnies to some distance. In order to estimate the velocity with which some were thrown from my chimney, I measured the greatest distance on the ground to which any of them had reach'd, and found it to be 30 feet; and the height of the chimney from which they fell was 32 feet. Now bodies fall thro' 16 feet nearly in one second of time; and the times, in which they fall thro' other heights, are in the subdupli­cate ratio of those heights. From whence it follows, that the velocity, wherewith those bricks were thrown off, was that of above 21 feet in 1" of time. For the subduplicate ratio of 32 to 16 is the same as the simple ratio of 30 to a little more than 21. It will be impossible, I believe, ever to determine with exactness the rea [...] spaces thro' which any of our buildings vibrated, in this reciprocating motion of the earth. It may be observ'd, however, that the shorter these vibrations are supposed to have been, the quicker or more frequent they must have been; the number of them in a given time being reciprocally as the length of each. Thus, for example, if each vibration had been of one foot in length, then th [...]re were 21 of them in 1" of time; but if each were of 6 [...] then there were 42 of them in a second; and so on. Possibly, some of these reciprocations might be as quick as those of a musical chord.

But it is not to be doubted, that the velocity, wherewith our buildings were agitated, was different in different places. It was different also, as I apprehend, at different heights. This I collect from the observation, that a key, which was thrown off a shelf in my house, was not thrown so far, in proportion to the height thro' which it fell, as the bri [...]ks were from the top of the chimney. Hence it appears, that our buildings were r [...]cked with a kind of angular motion, like that of a cradle; the upper parts of them moving swifter, or thro' greater spaces in the same time, than the lower. d This perf [...]ctly agrees with the idea of an [Page 11] undulatory motion of the earth; as you may clearly conceive by turning your thoughts to the case of a vessel floating at rest upon stagnant water, and then suddenly agitated by a great wave rolling under it. In the motion of ascent, the mast of the vessel would be thrown forward, in the same direction as the wave was moving; and in the motion of descent, backward, or in the con­trary direction; and in both these cases, the top of the must would move thro' greater spaces than the bottom.

[Page 12]As it is certain, that in the great shock, the earth had an hori­zontal motion; so it appears with the most sensible evidence to me, that in the shock we felt the Saturday evening following, at 27' after 8, there was a perpendicular motion of the earth. I was then sitting on a brick hearth, and felt the motion of the bricks distinctly under my feet. It was not a motion of the whole hearth together, either from side to side, or up and down; but of each brick separately by itself. Now as the bricks were contiguous, the only motion, which could be communicated to them separately, was in a perpendicular direction; and the sen­sation excited in me was exactly the same, as if some small so­lid body, by moving along under the hearth, had raised up the bricks successively, which immediately settled down again. The motion of the earth in this instance plainly appeared undu­latory to me; and this shock, I apprehend, was occasioned by one small wave of earth rolling along, but not with a very swift motion. For the velocity of it's progress was considerably less than that of sound, which moves about 13 miles in a mi­nute; as appeared from hence, that the roar of this earthquake might be heard at least half a minute before the shake was felt. Which also argues, that the shock began at some considerable distance from this place. The same remarks may be applied to the great shock; only this began with two at least, if not three waves, of much greater breadth and height. The latter part of this shock was tremulous, consisting chiefly in vibrations which succeeded one another with extreme quickness; and, as I take it, was owing to the efforts of the earth to recover the position, out of which it had been violently thrust, during the undulatory mo­tion: Much in the same manner, as the re [...]iprocations of a mu­sical chord are occasioned by it's endeavour [...] to restore it self to that situation, which it had before it was struck. As soon as the stroke, which bent it, ceases, the chord does not barely regain it's rectilinear figure, but bends itself almost as far the contrary way; and thus continues bending and unbending itself with great quickness, till it's motion is gradually destroyed, and at length it settles into a state of rest. Both these [...] ▪ then, seem [Page 13] evidently to have been of the undulatory kind; and to have dif­fered in degree only. e I would observe

Secondly, that the duration of the great shock was longer than has been usually observed. If my memory fails me not, even those earthquakes, which have brought on the most amazing ca­tastrophes, have commonly done their execution in one or two minutes; whereas this shock with us lasted at least four; tak­ing in the whole of the time, from the first agitation of the earth, till it was become perfectly quiet; though the violence of the shock did not last above half so long. This I am assured of, partly from the observations of some Gentlemen, who were up, and looked on their watches, when it began and ended; and partly from my own, which were as follows. The preceding noon, I had adjusted both my clock and watch, by a meridian line; and the following noon I found that the watch had kept time exactly. Being awaked by the earthquake, I lay till the violence of it seemed to be over, for the second time; for it had a little abated before, as if it were going off, and then instantly began again with redoubled fury. Till then I forb [...]re to rise, because the agitation was so vehement, that I concluded it would be very difficult, if not impracticable, to go from the bed to the chimney, without being thrown down; and therefore thought it best not to attempt it. The space of time, in which I say awake, I cannot think to be much, if any thing, less than 2'. This was the conjecture I formed at that time; though it being but conjecture, I would not lay very great stress upon it, were it not supported by concurring observations. On the second a­batement I rose, and lighting a candle, looked on my watch, and [Page 14] found it to be 15' after 4. The shock then was not quite over, but the windows continued rattling for about a minute longer, as near as I can remember; for the shock went off very gradually. As soon as I had looked on the watch, I went directly to the clock, which was in another chamber, that I might see whether that agreed with the watch; and found that it was stop'd at 4 hours 11' 35". It's stopping, however, was not, immediately, owing to the violence of the shock, though several clocks, and watches too, at Boston are said to have been stop'd by it; but to the fol­lowing accident. Having some time before used a pretty long glass tube, in a particular experiment, I had shut it up in the clock-case for security; and this tube, being overthrown by the earthquake, lodged against the pendulum, and stop'd it's motion. By this accident, the beginning of the earthquake, I conceive, is determined with all the exactness that can be desired; for, so far as I can learn, the first shake was violent enough to overset so tall, slender a body, and standing in a position so near a per­pendicular, as that tube; and it was impossible for the pendulum to make one oscillation, after the tube had struck against it. Now from the time when the clock stop'd, to my looking on the watch, it was about 3' [...]; and the jarring was not quite over, till about a minute after this: So that I think I speak within bounds, when I say, that this shock with us lasted at least 4'. In other places, it's duration might possibly be different. I observe

Thirdly, as to the course of this earthquake, that it seems to have been nearly from N. W. to S. E. I was informed a few minutes after the shock, by a person who was upon the common in this town at the time, that the noise began about the N. W, and came on from thence, and pass'd away toward the S.E; and other accounts, which I have since met with, agree with this. Those who were in such clear, open places could make the best judge­ment in this matter; for such as were within doors, or surround­ed with buildings, might easily be misled by the various reflecti­ons of the sound. I am induced to give the greater credit to this information, by what I observed my self. For the key be­fo [...]e spoken of; as thrown from off a shelf in my house, was found at a place on the floor, which bore very near N. W. of [Page 15] the place from which it fell; though the situation of it before it's fall was such, that it might have been thrown in several other directions as well as that, had the course of the earthquake been different. f

[Page 16]Having mad [...] the observations propos'd, let us now attempt [Page 17] to trace out the causes of these great [...]. g

That the agents, which are able to produce affects so extra­ordinary as those before recited; which can ha [...]ve up such [...]nor­mous masses of matter, and put into the most vehement commo­tion vast tracts of land and sea, of many hundred miles in ex­tent;—that the agents, I say, which can do all this, and more, must be very powerful, will not admit of a doubt. Now we know of nothing in nature more powerful: than the particles of certain bodies converted into vapor by the action of fire. Fire then, and proper materials for it to act upon, it is probable, are the principal agents in this affair. And what greatly strengthens the probability is, an observation before-mentioned that those countries, which have burning mountains, are most subject to earthquakes; and that these mountains rage with uncommon fu [...]y, about the time when the circumjacent countries are torn with convul [...]ions;—an argument this, that the eruptions of such mo [...]n­tains, and earthquakes, are owing to one and the same cause. But we must be more particular.

[Page 18]1. The earth is not solid throughout, but contains within it many large holes, pits and caverns; as is agreed by all Natural Historians. There are very probably also long, crooked, une­qual passages, which run winding through a great extent of earth, and form a communication between very distant regions. h Some [Page 19] of these cavities are dry, and contain nothing but air, or the fumes of fermenting minerals; in others, there are currents of water.

2. This globe is a very heterogeneous body. Besides the two grand divisions of it into solid and fluid parts, each of these is again divisible into an indefinite number of others. Although our knowledge of the earth reaches but a little way below it's surface, yet so far as we have penetrated, it appears to be a com­pages of a vast variety of solid substances, ranged in a manner which to us seems to have not much of regularity in it. Here we find earths, stones, salts, sulphurs, minerals, metals, &c. and a great number of inferior species under each of these general heads, blended and intermingled with each other. Many of these are combustible, or of a texture proper to be turned by fire into flame and vapor. And besides the pure elementary wa­ter, if there be any such, the aqueous parts of the globe receive [Page 20] peculiar tinctures from the beds and veins through which they run; so that perhaps there may be almost as many sorts of wa­ters, as there are of solid substances. Thus, some waters are charged with sulphur [...]ous particles; some, with particles of iron; and others, with those of other minerals. And the [...]ubterrane­ous rivers and streams, thus impregnated with different particles, may, by their confluence, produce an almost infinite variety of mixtures in the earth. Probably, this promi [...]cuous disposition of materials, in the bowels of the earth, may be necessary to the growth of bodies in it; for in the judgement of some of the most eminent philosophers, particularly the excellent Mr. BOYLE, even the harde [...]t, inorganized bodies, as stones, metals, &c. do, in their proper way, grow within the earth, as truly as vegetables grow on it's surface, or animals in their parent animals. And to the same [...]nd seems to conduce.

3. The heat within the bowels of the earth. Heat, it is well known, is a grand agent in most natural productions; and the inner parts of the earth are sufficiently furnished with it. Some parts indeed, as the vulcanos, are actually on fire and burn; but there is, moreover, an heat without flame, diffused through the interior regions of the earth. This is evident from the instance of hot springs, and from the warmth which is always found at great depths, as in the bottoms of mines.

4. There seems to be an inexhaustible source of this heat in the attractive powers, which Sir ISAAC NEWTON has shewn to belong to the particles of matter. For, heat consisting in a p [...] ­culiar kind of intestine motion of the parts of bodies; whatever tends to produce this motion in bo [...]es, will cause them to grow hot. Now such a motion may be produced, by the particles of different bodies rushing together, in virtue of their attractive powers; of which that great man has given a very copious col­lection of instances in the 31st Question at the end of his Op­ticks, whither I must refer you. In some of them, not only a very sudden and violent heat, but an actual flame, is produ­ced, by the bare mixing of two cold bodies together; and that, even without the presence of the air, which we find absolutely necessary to our culinary fires. So in a remarkable experiment, (first made, I think, by Dr. SLARE) when a certain ‘compound [Page 21] spirit of nitr [...] is poured on half it's weight of any ponderous oil of vegetable or animal substances, the liquors grow so very hot in mixing, as presently to send up a burning flame.’ 9 At the first trial, so small a quantity, as ‘a drachm of this spirit, being poured upon half a drachm of such oil, in vacu [...], to see what effect would ensue; the mixture in the twinkling of an eye made a flash like gun-powder, and blew up the exhausted receiver, whose diameter was six inches, and depth above eight; all who were present being astonished at the unexpected event.’ There is also so strong an attraction between iron and sulphur, that 'even the gross body of sulphur powder'd,' con­tinues Sir ISAAC, ‘and with an equal weight of iron filings and a little water made into paste, in a few hours grows too hot to be touch'd, and emits a flame. And by these experiments compared with the great quantity of sulphur with which the earth abounds, and the warmth of the interior parts of the earth, and hot springs, and burning mountains, and with damps, mineral coruscations, &c. we may learn that sulphureous steams abound in the bowels of the earth, and ferment with minerals, and sometimes take fire with a sudden coruscation and explosion.’ But to set this curious doctrine in it's full light, it would be necessary to repeat that whole Question; which indeed highly deserves it, would the time permit. For it would then appear, that there is a very great variety of bodies, which being mixed together, produce so strong an effervescence, as to emit inflammable fumes. Thus, to mention one instance more, when iron is dissolving in a mixture of oil of vitriol and common water, there instantly arises a great heat and violent ebullition, with fumes copiously exhaling; which are so very inflammable, that, being set on fire, they go off at once like a gun, with a great explosion. Having thus seen what a perpetual source of heat there is in these powerful, active principles, con­tinu [...]lly [Page 22] operating within the bowels of the earth; let us next inquire, what effects may be expected from it. Therefore

5. It is a known property of heat to expand bodies, to rarefy them, and enlarge their dimensions; and, when raised to an high­er degree, to separate their parts, and make them fly from each other; as in some measure appears already from the instances mentioned under the foregoing article. This effect heat has upon solid as well as fluid bodies;—upon the hardest, as well as the soft­est. It is observable here, that such particles as cohere by the strongest attraction, do most forcibly repel one another, when they are once separated by heat. And when the heat is intense, and the particles of the heated body are prevented from flying away, till they become thoroughly hot; it will require very strong vessels to [...] their b [...]r [...]ing forth with a violent explo­sion. Thus, a single drop of common water, inclosed in a glass bubble, and laid upon the fire: as soon as it become hot, will burst the bubble, with a report sca [...] inferior to that of a pistol. And water in larger quantities has been heated to that degree, as to rend in sander very strong vessels of [...], in which it has been endeavour [...]d to be confined. What the [...] then would be, of a great body of water's suddenly making it's way into a flaming cavern, whose sulphur [...]ou [...] or [...] fires are not extinguished but in [...]ag [...]d by water; and of it's being there, almost instantaneously, converted into vapor; your own imaginations may easily represent to you. This, it is very likely, has some­times been the case with respect to those famous vulcanos, AEtna and Vesuvio; both which border on the sea. You see here what water may do; but there are many other bodies, which cohere more strongly, as sulphur and nitre, for example, whose vapor is still more powerful than that of water. This is evident from the composition of gun-powder; a very small quantity of which, when turned into vapor, every one knows, is able to remove any obstacle that opposes it's expansion, and to burst the firmest rocks. The paste abovementioned, made of powdered sulphur and iron filings, if put a few feet under ground, will by degrees cause the earth over it to heave and crack, to let out the flame; thus making an artificial earthquake. And therefore, if a water, [Page 23] saturated with sulphureous particles, should in it's passage under ground soak into a large bed of iron ore, or a strong c [...]alybeate water into a bed of sulphur; the mixture would doubtless per­for [...] in great, what this experiment does in miniature. A vitri­oli [...] water mixing with iron, if in sufficient quantities, would be followed with the like effect. But no mixture of this nature appears so surprizing as Dr. SLARE'S, which did not require so much as the presence of the air to inkindle it, From this small mixture, which was but one drachm and an half, a force was generated in an instant, by the mutual collision of those active liquors, far exceeding the weight of the atmos­phere that pressed down the receiver; which in that experiment amounted to about 420 pounds. I say, far exceeding; for the receiver was not barely raised, but 'with a much greater force blown up,' as Dr. SLARE expresses it. We have no right indeed, that I know of, to suppose all the same sorts of bodies, both solid and fluid, in the bowels of the earth, as chemistry has furnished us with; but several things induce us to believe, that in those dark recesses, impenetrable as they are to mortal eyes, bodies are prepared, by a kind of natural chemistry, which very much resemble many of our chemical preparations, and are pos­sessed of the same essential properties. To be sure, there are not wanting, in those lower regions, all the degrees of heat, which a Chemist could desire for any of his processes. If then two bodies, of the like nature as the spirit and oil used in this experiment, should be mingled together in due quantity, though in the closest subterraneous vault, which neither contained any genuine air, nor could admit any; I need not say, that an earth­quake must be the consequence.

You have now, I suppose, before you the general causes of earthquakes. You have seen that there are in the bowels of the earth inflammable materials, of various kinds, and in large quantities; some in the form of solid or liquid bodies, and others in that of exhalations and vapors; that there are also powerful principles constantly at work, which are capable of inkindling these materials into an actual flame; and that the vapor generated from such flame will endeavour to expand it self on all sides [Page 24] with immense force. If now these inflammable vapors be p [...]nt up in close caverns, so as to find no vent till they are collected in a large quantity; so soon as they take fire in any part, the flame will spread itself, wherever it meets with materials to con­vey it, with as great rapidity, perhaps, as it does in a train of gun­powder; and the vapors produced from hence will rush along through the subterraneous grottos, as they are able to find or force for themselves a passage; and by heaving up the earth that lies over them, will make that kind of progressive swell or un­dulation, in which we have supposed earthquakes commonly to consist; and will at length burst the caverns with a great shaking of the earth, as in springing a mine; and so discharge themselves into the open air. 10 These vapors may possibly sometimes in­fect [Page 25] the air, and bring on pestilential distempers, which have been said to be consequent upon great earthquakes. Not that [Page 26] I can give credit to all the reports of this sort, which have been handed about; many of them having been propagated by writers of an astrological turn, who have been as ready to attribute distempers to the configurations of the planets, and to the ap­pearance of comets, as to earthquakes.

By this time, enough has been said, I should think, to con­vince you, that the earth contains within itself the seeds of earth­quakes in great abundance. And all these things being consi­dered, it may seem rather a wonder that we have no more earth­quakes, than that we have so many. The causes of earthquakes are incessantly at work; and although it may require a course of years bb to ripen the proper materials to that pitch, as [Page 27] that they can force for themselves a passage thro' the earth; yet it is reasonable to expect, that they will from time to time be collected in such quantities, and ferment to such degrees, as to make these explosions unavoidable. As therefore our globe has been subject to such concussions from the earliest accounts of an­tiquity, we have no room to doubt but that it will continue to be so, as long as the present frame of nature subsists. For this we may be assured of, that though that imprisoned vapor be dis­charged into the open air, which, by its struggles to escape, has caused an earthquake; yet the fermenting minerals, from which it was generated, will be continually supplying new quantities of the same; and even those very minerals may from time to time be re-produced, as they are consumed; as was before ob­served. Thus we see, that in the very structure and constitution of this globe, provision has been made to continue these agitations of it, at proper intervals of time, during the whole period of it's existence in it's present form; and that in every climate, from the equator to the pole. This suggests a reflection, with which I shall close the present discourse. It is this: That

Though these explosions, and consequent concussions of the earth, have indeed occasioned most terrible desolations, and in this light may justly be regarded as the tokens of an incensed DEITY; yet it can by no means be concluded from hence, that they are not of real and standing advantage to the globe in ge­neral. Multitudes, it is true, have at different times suffered by them; multitudes have been destroyed by them; but much greater multitudes may have been every day benefited by them. The all-wise CREATOR could not but foresee all the effects of all the powers he implanted in matter; and, as we find in innumerable in­ [...]ances (and the more we know of his works, the more such in­ [...]ances we discover) that he has established such laws for the go­vernment of the world, as tend to promote the good of the [Page 28] whole, we may reasonably presume, that he has done it in this case as well as others. To me, at least, the argument on this side the question, drawn from the general analogy of nature, ap­pear [...] to have more force, than any that I have seen offered on the other. For there is nothing, however useful, however ne­cessary, but what is capable of producing, and in fact has produ­c [...]d, damage, in single in [...]ances. It were endless to particular­ize here; I shall therefore only mention one or two things by way of specimen. The power of gravity,—a power of such indispensable importance, that without it the system of nature could not subsist a moment, has yet proved the destruction of multitudes. The wind, so necessary for the purposes of navi­gation, as well as to purge the air, which would otherwise [...]ag­nate and pu [...]refy,—how often has it risen to [...]uch a pitch, as to overthrow houses, and wre [...]k vessels? by which means thou­sands have perished. Even thunder and lightning, which, next to earthquakes, are the most terrible phaenomena of nature, are yet universally allowed to be necessary to free the atmosphere from a certain unwholsome [...]ultriness, which often infects it. Other instances of the like sort I leave to your own reflections: and would rather observe, that the world is governed by general laws; and general laws must, from the nature of them, be liable sometimes to do hurt. However, laws of this sort are suffici­ently vindicated, not only as wise, but as good, if upon the whole they produce a maximum of good; (to borrow an expression from the Mathematicians;) and this, it is in the highest degree pro­bable, all the laws of nature do. It may be added, that as in the animal body, the evacuations, which are of ab [...]olute necessity to maintain life and health, do yet sometimes run to such extremes as to prove mortal; so in like manner, these explosions of sub­terraneous vapor, whose effects have sometimes been so fatal, may, notwithstanding this, be highly conducive, and even indis­pensably necessary, to the good of this globe in general. The explosions themselves, as well as the laws, in consequence of which they are produced, may be necessary on various accounts; [Page 29] and particularly to the carrying on the more secret and noble works of nature within the entrails of the earth. cc Let me dilate a little on this matter.

By the incessant action of gravity and other attractive powers, and by the perpetual consumption of fluids, the earth becomes, continually more and more hard, compact and dense. Now an openness or looseness of contexture, to a certain degree, in the earth, is necessary to carry on the operations of nature within it. So that on the supposition that mineral, metalline, and other subterraneous bodies grow within the earth, it should seem that the earth must become gradually less and less fit for the produc­tion of them. Since then the direct, immediate, and most general effect of earthquakes is, by shaking to loosen and disunite the parts of the earth, and to open it's pores, it seems agreeable to reason to infer, that this is the end primarily aimed at in these concussions. But you will take notice, that I speak here only, of physical or natural ends. For though I make no doubt, that the laws of nature were established, and that the operations of nature are conducted, with a view, ultimately, to moral purposes; and that there is the most perfect coincidence, at all times, be­tween GOD's government of the natural and of the moral world; yet it would be improper for me to enter into these di [...] ­quisitions at this time, since my province limits me to consider th [...] subject, only in the relation which it bears to natural philosophy. It is in the physical sense alone that I say, the disjoining the parts of the earth, and opening it's pores, may be the end primarily aimed at in earthquakes, as such mutations in the earth may from time to time become necessary to the production of subterraneous [Page 30] bodies; and perhaps this end could not be effectually answered by less forcible methods. This point may receive some light, if not proof, from the operations of agriculture. We find it necessary, by ploughing, digging, &c. to break the clods of the ground, to comminute and even pulverize it, in order to fit it for the purposes of vegetation; and we find it necessary to renew these labors every year. Now the use and tendency of these artificial operations may bear some analogy to those of the greater operations of nature, which we are speaking of. And indeed, it is not in the least degree improbable, that such a loosening of the parts of the earth may promote even the growth of vege­tables on it's surface, as well as of minerals in it's bowels; it being now well known, that all vegetables, the smaller as well as the larger, shoot some fibres of their roots to vastly greater depths, than those to which any of our instruments of tillage ever penetrate. This, it is, likely, may be one reason of the wonder­ful fertility, for which AEtna and Vesuvio have been so gene­rally and so highly celebrated. Again; it may be necessary now and then, to have such subterraneous vapors, as are gene­rated by fermentation, discharged up into the air; as their con­tinuance below, in the caverns of the earth, might be an impedi­ment to those important processes which are there carrying on. But those very vapors, which might obstruct some sorts of natural processes, while below the surface of the earth, may as much advance others, when above it. We know that in many cases of the fermentation of bodies, especially of such dense ones as salts and minerals, air is plentifully absorbed; and that in many others, it is as plentifully generated: So that great part of the exhala­tions thrown out by earthquakes may be true, permanent air, and designed to recruit what has been absorbed by bodies here on the surface. And perhaps the grounds, on which the great NEW­TON founded his ‘suspicion, dd that the finest, the most subtile, and most spirituous parts of our air, and those which are most necessary to maintain the life of all things, come chiefly from the comets’; may equally support another suspicion, that some [Page 31] such particles of air may be derived also from subterraneous eruptions. For among the almost infinite variety of particles which are thrown out of the earth in these eruptions, it is most likely, that if some are noxious, others will be salutary. It may also be necessary from time to time to have the subterrane­ous streams diverted from their former courses into new ones: partly, that different places in the lower regions may be watered by them; and partly, that the waters themselves, by passing through different beds or chanels, may alter their properties, ee and convey new tinctures to different places.

But however these things may be; whether all the foregoing conjectures be well founded, or not: If these explosions and con­cussions be, as it is next to certain that they are, the necessary and inevitable consequences of such laws of nature, and such powers in matter, as our globe could not well subsist without; this ought to silence all the complaints of those who suffer either loss or terror by them; as well as all the objections, which men of [...]c [...]ptical minds have been disposed to make, upon this head, to the order of Providence. It ought, in reason, to do this, though we should never be able to point out all the particular advantages resulting from them. For, it is plain, they may be beneficial in a thousand other ways, than we, short-sighted mor­tals, may pretend to guess at.

To sum up all in a word. This is a MIX'D state; in which there is such a variety of purposes, natural as well as moral, in prosecution at the same time, that there may be nothing, per­haps, in the material world, that is simply and absolutely evil;—nothing, but what, under the direction of infinite wisdom, power and beneficence, is, in some or other of it's consequences, pro­ductive of an over-balance of good:

Upon the whole. How 'wonderful in counsel,' how ‘ex­cellent in working’ is that BEING, who can bring good out of the greatest evils; and can answer intentions, the most widely differing, by one and the same dispensation of His providence!

The END.
[Page]

APPENDIX,
Concerning the Operation of Electrical Substance in EARTH­QUAKES; and the Effects of Iron Points.

A little tract having lately appeared among us, under a respectable nam [...], hinting at a different cause of earthquakes, from that which is delivered in these papers; it is desired and expected, I [...], by several worthy Persons, that I should here take some notice of it. This I shall end [...]avou [...] to do, with all the respect that belongs to v [...]nera­ble characters, consist [...]nt with that superior regard which i [...] due only to truth. When I composed the foregoing discourse, I thought it of more importanc [...] to explain to my pupils what I took to be the real causes of earthquak [...]s, then to enter into an examin [...]tion of ‘the many [...]ine but uncertain [...] of the projecting sort of Philosophe [...] both ancient and modern;’ to do which, with any degree of exactnes [...], would have required a dis [...]ourse by its [...]lf. [...]hi­losophy, like every thing else, has had it's fashion [...], and the reigning m [...]de of last has been, to explain every thing by ELECTRICITY. It is not long▪ sin [...] we were amused with pompous accounts of the wonderful effects of electricity in the practice of phy [...]ic. It was extoll'd as [...] perfect [...]a [...]li [...]n; [...] repre­sented as aff [...]rding the most easy, and, at the same time, the most e [...]e [...]t [...]al means of conveying into the body, the active particles of all medicines, [...]m [...]tic, c [...]thartic, alterative,&c. and as curing, or at le [...]t relieving, almost i [...]stantan [...]o [...]sly, the most obstinate and intrac [...]able disorders, which the [...]uman body is li [...]ble to; gout, blindness, deafness, dumbness, and what not! [...]ut this affair is pr [...]tty well over for the present. Now, it seems, it is to be the cause of earthquakes. Electricity indeed is at this day certainly known to be a much more extensi [...]e principle in nature, than was suspected a few years ago; and to have a hand in the production of effects, where it was thought to have no concern. It must not, however, be concluded from hence, that it is the sole principle of natural effects, and that it does every thing. It is true, the very ing [...]nious Mr. FRANKLIN of Philadelphia has, with singular s [...]gacity, and, in my opinion, with happy success, accounted this way for the phaenome [...]a of thunder a [...]d lightning; and has made discoveries upon this subject, which are not only ex­trem [...]y curio [...] in speculation, but of high importance in practice. [...]ut this is no argument, that electricity is also the cause of earthquakes. In the tract before me, P. 2 [...]. we are indeed told, that ‘the El [...]ctrical Substance subsists and moves to and fro in different Parties or Collecti [...]ns in the Bowels of the Earth, as well as in the Clouds of the Air. And so waving about in different Parties in the Earth below, though by Divine Direction, and sur­rounding [Page 33] rounding other substances, as in the air above; when a greater party comes within the striking distance of another, a shock is immediately effected: and in proportion to the quantities of those several parties, and the other sub­ [...]nces surrounded by them, is the shock in the earth, either less or greater. And " all this" with more is said to be "argued from Analogy." But that analogy does not take place here; that the two cases of lightning and earth­quakes are no way parallel; and that the electric substance, when in the bowels of the earth, is in circumstances essentially different from what it is, when in the clouds of the air; will, I think, plainly appear, by taking a brief view of the known laws of electricity, so far as they can be thought to relate to this subject. Not that I here take upon me to maintain a negative, or to assert absolutely, that electricity cannot possibly be, directly nor indirectly, concerned in the production of earthquakes. Neither would I assert this of magnetism, any more than of electricity. I cannot say how for the unknown causes of these powers may be connected together, and with the causes of other attractive and repulsive powers; and therefore do not pretend to know all the possible effects of either of them; or what remote influence they may have, in virtue of some yet undiscovered properties, upon any of the phaenom [...]na of this lower world. What I would be understood to mean, then, is this, that according to the laws of magnetism and electricity, so far as they have been hitherto discovered, it is inconceivable to me, how earthquakes can be accounted for by them. At present, we are concerned only with electricity.

The laws of electricity are;—that every body is either an electric per se, or a non-electric;—that electrics per se are incapable of receiving electricity by communication from others, and therefore cannot have the quantity of electrical substance, which they naturally contain, augmented; nor yet, on the other hand, can they have it diminished;—that non-electri [...]s may receive electricity by communication; but in order to this, it is fundamentally necessary, that they be intirely supported by, and surrounded with, electrics per se. For if a non-electric, which is to receive electricity by communication, or, as it is commonly called, to be electri [...]ed, touches another non-electric, or even if it is very near it; the electricity, received by the first, will be communicated to the second; and if there be more than two, to the third; and so on. And if this line of non-electrics reaches to the ground, all the electricity received will go away into the earth; and none of the non-electrics will be electri [...]ed at all. But if any number of non-electrics touching, or very near, one another, be terminated on all sides by electri [...]s, they may then receive and retain electricity for some time. For the electric supporters, being incapable of receiving this communicated elec­tricity, stop the progress of it, and confine it to the non-electrics. All this will appear plainer, especially to those who have seen electric experiments, by sing­ling out a particular instance. Thus, a met [...]ll [...]e tube, such as is commonly used is electric experiments, and is called a conductor, is a non-electric, and is inca­pable of being rendered electrical, by any action immediately upon it. A glass globe is an electric per se, and may have it's electricity excited by rubbing it; [Page 34] and if it be very near the non-electric conductor, it will communicate it's elec­tric virtue to that, provided the conductor be properly supported. It must be supported by nothing but electri [...]s per se, such as glass, wax, rosin, &c▪ or by lines of silk or hair. Such supporters, as they cannot receive the virtue from the glass globe, will stop it from running off the conductor, which by that means be­c [...]mes electri [...]ed. But if the conductor be not intirely supported in this manner; if there be the smallest line of communication, by the intervention of non-elec­trics, between the conductor and the earth, altho' it were but the finest wire, of a [...] thr [...]d of hemp or flax, or any thing that is wet; all the electricity, given by the globe to the conductor, will run off that way, and be lost in the earth; and the conductor will show no signs of electricity at all. It is known also, that the air, which surrounds this earth, is an electric per se; as appears from [...], among other considerations, that if it were non-electric, it would be impossible for us ever to electri [...]e a conductor, or any thing else; unless it were placed in [...]. For in that case, all the virtue, given to the conductor, would run off by the air; as, in damp weather, it does by the watery vapors floating in the air, which are non-electric bodies. It was before observed, that electrics cannot have their share of the electric substance increased or diminished; but non-electrics may, when duly supported: And the whole effect of abundance of the electric experiments, that are made in c [...]urses, is nothing more than this; that when one non electric is brought within a certain distance, called the strik­ing distance, of another non-electric, which contains a different proportion of the electric substance from the former; that which contains the most will impart so much to that which contains the least, as to make it equal in both. And the transition of the electric substance, from one of these bodies to the other, will be attended with a flash and a report; which will be greater, in proportion as the absolute quantity of the electric matter accumulated in one of the bodies [...] greater, and as the difference between the quantities in the bodies imparting and receiving is greater. And much in the same proportion will the striking distance be greater too.

It is easy now to see, that, though lightning may be accounted for upon these principles, earthquakes cannot. For clouds, which are collections of watery, that is, of non-electric vapors, being intirely supported and surrounded by air, which is an electric per se, are capable of having more or less than their natural quantity of the electric substance. And therefore, when a cloud, containing more or less than it's natural quantity of the electric substance, approaches the earth; or when two clouds, containing unequal quantities of this substance, approach one another; the consequence will be [...] a discharge of electric sub­stance from that body which contained the most of it, into that which con­tained the least, till it becomes equally divided between them; which discharge will be [...]ompanied with a flash of lightning and [...] of thunder. But where is the analogy between this case in the [...], and what may be supposed to pass in the bowels of the earth, to cause earthquakes? to make out any thing like an analogy, we must suppose, first, two huge non-electric bodies under ground, [Page 35] which, for some earthquakes, must be hundreds, if not thousands, of miles in extent; and secondly, that each of these non-electrics is intirely supported and surrounded by electri [...]s per se. The first of these suppositions has no difficulty in it; because this terraqu [...]ous globe consists almost wholly of non-electrics; but where to find such electric supporters for these vast conductors, as are re­quired in the second, in a point, I humbly conceive, attended with very great difficulty. And yet, without this, it is impossible that either of these non-ele [...]rics can have more or less than it's own natural quantity of electric sub­stance. For though we were told of its ‘waving about in different parties in the earth below,’ yet there can be no such thing; unless the 'Divine Di­rection,' here introduced, should in this case suspend or set aside the established laws of nature: that is, should act miracul [...]sly. But this will hardly be sup­posed: [...], to have recourse to miraculous interpositions of the 'Divine Direction,' is to put an [...] end at once to all reasoning [...] about electricity, or earthquakes, or any other natural phaenomena. There can therefore, I say, be no such thing as this ‘waving about of the electric substance in different Parties in the earth below,’ so long as the 'Divine Direction' continues to operate according to the established laws of electricity: It being a certain truth, that whatever quantity of this electric substance is communicated to any non-electric body, it is equally diffused in an instant throughout the whole of that body. Thus, the virtue of the glass globe, though applied only to one end of the conductor, is in a moment spread all over it, and throughout it; and the conductor becomes equally electri [...]ed in every part. There can, therefore, be no inequality of electric substance in the non-electric bodies of which this globe is composed, excepting only in those which are intirely surrounded by electri [...] per se. Through all the rest of the globe, the electric substance will be equally and uniformly diffused. Now if we could even find electric supporters for these vast conductors of a thousand or two miles in extent, a very great difficulty would still remain, which is, that this very circumstance of having electric support­ers on all sides, without which no non-electric can have more than it's own natu­ral quantity of electric substance thrown into it, nor any withdrawn from it, will, in the bowels of the earth, effectually prevent either of these alterations. The reason of this will appear plainer, I believe, by a particular instance, than by a long explanation. Suppose a glass bottle of water to be shut up perfectly tight with a glass stopple. Here will be a non-electric intirely surrounded with an electric. If this water had more than it's natural quantity of electric substance thrown into it, before it was stop'd up, the glass covering would keep it in; or if it had less, the same covering would prevent more from entring into it out of the neighbouring bodies. After the bottle is stop'd, the glass, which now surrounds the water on all sides, by cutting off all communication be­tween the water within the bottle and other non- [...]lectrics without, is an effec­tual bar in the way of any alteration. No more of the electric substance can, after this, enter into the bottle, or come out of it. And thus if, in the bow­el [...] of the earth, there be a non-electric intirely surrounded with electri [...]s, it [Page 36] can have no additional quantity of electric substance thrown into it, nor any drawn out of it; the electrics, which surround it, preventing the passage of this electric substance, either from without, inwards; or from within, outwards. And the case will be the same, if the non-electric be not intir [...]ly surrounded with electrics. For then, if any quantity of the electric substance were attempted to be thrown into the non-electric, it would not remain there, but would instantly spread itself into the neighbouring non-electric bodies; and if any were attempt­ed to be drawn out, it's place would be immediately supplied out of the neigh­bouring bodies. Thus it appears, that there can be ‘no unequal distribution of this substance in the earth;’ and consequently, by this Gentleman's own confession in p. 20, 'nothing to produce any concu [...]ions there.'

For brevity's sake, I have insisted only on this single circumstance of the ne­ce [...]ty of electric supporters. When this difficulty is cleared up, there ar [...] others to be offered.

But the most exceptionable part is yet to come. It is the Postscript in p. 23. which runs thus.

‘P. S. The more P [...]ints of Iron are er [...]ted round the Earth, to draw the Electrical Substance out of the Air; the more the Earth must needs be charged with-it. And therefore it seems worthy of Consideration▪ Whether any Part of the Earth being fuller of this terri [...] ▪ Substance, may not be more exposed to more sh [...]c [...]ing Earthquakes. In Boston are more e [...]cted than any where else in New-England: and Boston seems to be more dreadfully shaken. O! there is no getting out of the mighty Ha [...]d of GOD! If we think to avoid it in the Air, we cannot in the Earth: Yea it may grow more fatal.’ When I first read this Postscript, I was both s [...]rprised and concerned:—sur­prised, to find so many mistakes in so few lines; and concerned, for the ill effects it would probably have. For I could see no other effects of it, but that it would fill with unnecessary terrors [...] minds of many persons, who were not well enough acquainted with the laws [...] electricity, to discover the mistakes: And that it would discourage the use of [...] iron-p [...]ints, which were erecting in Boston and elsewhere; and which, by the blessing of GOD, might be a means of p [...]eventing many of those mischievous and sorrowful accidents, which we have so often seen to follow upon thunder storms. In order therefore to guard, as much as I can, against the ill effects just mention [...]d, I shall now lay open, though as briefly as possible, the principal of these mistakes.

1. Strictly speaking, it is a mistake to say, that ‘points of iron erected round the earth draw the electrical substance out of the air. For the air, being an electric per se, obstinately retains it's own quantity of this substance▪ and will not part with it to any other body. They do indeed draw it out of the clouds in the air; which, being non-electrics, can part with some of it. But even this they must be said to d [...], only in a qualified sense; and not so univer­sally, as the first words of this P. [...]. [...]eem to intimate. For

[Page 37]2dly, I appeal to every Reader, whether the idea, most obviously conveyed by those words, be not this, that these iron points do, by a constant and perpe­tual action, keep drawing the electric substance out of the air, and overcharging the earth with it. Now this is far from being the case. They never draw it out of the air, or, more properly, out of the clouds in the air, but when those clouds have more than their due quantity of it, and the earth, less; and con­sequently, it is impossible, that they should ever overcharge the earth with it at all. The only thing they can do is, to restore to the earth it's just quan­tity, when it is undercharged. But supposing they did constantly draw this electric substance out of the air into the earth, yet.

3dly, They could never fill any part of the earth fuller of this terrible substance; nor consequently ‘expose any one part more than another to more shocking earthquakes. For how much soever of this terrible substance be sup­posed drawn out of the air into any particular part of the earth, it cannot re­main collected there, but will instantly spread itself all around into the neigh­bouring parts which have less of it, and thus will be restored to an equality every where.

4thly. I know no reason to think, that 'Boston was more dreadfully shaken' than other towns. Some of the effects of the earthquakes may have been more considerable, for their number, there than elsewhere; but the reason of this is, not that ‘in Boston are more points of iron erected than any where else in New-England,, but that there are more brick houses erected there. For the effect of a shock is more considerable upon brick-work than upon wood-work. The reasons of this are obvious; and that it is so in fact, plainly appeared by our chimnies being every where more shattered than any thing else: Though this was in part owing to their being the highest parts of buildings.

5thly. I should think, though with the utmost deference to superior judge­ments, that the pathetic exclamation, which comes next, might well enough have been spared. 'O! there is no getting out of the mighty hand of GOD!' For I cannot believe, that in the whole town of Boston, where so many iron points are erected, there is so much as one person, who is so weak, so ignorant, so foolish, or, to say all in one word, so athei [...]tical, as ever to have entertained a single thought, that it is possible, by the help of a few yards of wire, to 'get out of the mighty hand of GOD.'

6thly. The postscript proceeds. 'If we think to avoid it' [the mighty hand of God] ‘in the Air, we cannot in the Earth: Yea it may grown more fatal.’ Upon which I observe, that if the hypothesis in question were right; if earthquakes were indeed caused by ‘any parts of the earth being fuller of this terrible substance than they ought to be; it would follow, not that iron points make 'the mighty hand of God grow more fatal', or 'expose those parts to more shocking earthquakes;' as is here most groundlessly insinuated: But it would follow, that iron points would be of great and most admirable use, in preventing earthquakes as well as thunder and lightning. For it must be [Page 38] observed, that these iron points have, not only a power of drawing electric substance out of the clouds into the earth, but an equal power of throwing off this same substance out of the earth into the clouds; which latter power they exert, as often as the former: according to Mr. FRANKLIN'S observations, to whom we are indebted for the discovery of both these powers of points. This latter power the Postscript has intirely overlooked. The truth is: If a cloud have more than it's due quantity of electric substance, these points will draw the redundant part of it down into the earth; but if it have less, the points will throw off enough out of the earth into the cloud to supply the deficiency. If then it were possi­ble for earthquakes to be caused by the earth's being more charged with electric substance than it should be, and the air's being charged less; the iron points would stand ready to throw off the superfluous part from the earth into the upper regions of the air; and thus, by removing the cause of earthquakes, would take away the effect.

I have now considered what this remarkable Postscript tells us 'seems wor­thy of consideration.' I have taken no notice of several other things in this piece which seem liable to just exception; but hope I have fully vindicated the character of these innocent and injured iron-p [...]ints; and have shewed, that all apprehen­ [...]ons of danger arising from them are perfectly groundless and chimerical.

J.W.

An Additional Article to Note in Page 17.

4. As to the limits of our great shock; I have very lately been informed, that it was felt at Annapolis-Royal in Nova-Scotia; though in a much less degree than with us. It shook off a few bricks from the tops of some chim­ni [...]s; but was not perceived by vessels upon the water. And a Letter from Halifax, which I have seen, says, ‘The earthquake, which happened in the west, extended itself to this place, though scarcely perceivable here.’ Thus, Halifax seems to have been very near the N. E. limit.

For the other limit, towards the S. W. my information is, that it was felt on the eastern side of Ches [...]peak Bay in Maryland; and not on the wes­tern side.

The Reader is desired to read centre for centure in p. 25. line 10 from the bottom; and to excuse any smaller mistakes.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.