The answer of several ministers in and near Boston, to that case of conscience, whether it is lawful for a man to marry his wives own sister?

The answer of several ministers in and near Boston, to that case of conscience, whether it is lawful for a man to marry his wives own sister?

Table of contents

Title page

To the READER.

Concerning the Case of Conscience proposed to our Consideration, Viz. WHether it be Lawful for a Man to Marry his Wives own Sister?

Mrs. JUDITH HULL, Of Boston, in N. E. Daughter of Mr. Edmund Quincey; late Wife of JOHN HULL Esq. deceased.

Epitaph

[Page]

Concerning the Case of Conscience proposed to our Consideration, Viz. WHether it be Lawful for a Man to Marry his Wives own Sister?

We Answer in the Negative; That it is utterly Unlawful, Incestuous, and an Hainous Sin in the Sight of God. For,

1. The Scripture sayes, None shall approach to any that is near akin to him. Lev. 18 6. Now the particulars instanced in that Chapter shew, that by kindred is meant not only Consanguinity, but Affinity, or such as are allyed by Marriage as well as by Blood. It is then clear, that a Mans Wives Sister is near akin to him: for She relates to him in the very first degree of Affinity, which is near kinred. It is a ruled Case amongst all Orthodox Divines and Judicious Casuists, That a Man may not Marry any of his Wives kindred nearer in Blood than he may of his own; nor may the Woman of her Husbands. A Man may as lawfully Marry his own Mother as his Wives Mother, his own Aunt as his Uncles Wife; so his own Sister as his Wives Sister. Lev. 18 14.

2. There is in the Scripture an express Prohibition of Marriage with such as are no nearer akin than a Mans Wives Sister is. To instance. A Man may not Marry his Brothers Wife Lev. 18. 16. and 20. 21 Math. 14. 4. Which Implies [Page] that a man may not Marry his Wives Sister, who is as near akin to him as his Brothers Wife. Persons not named in the Law, if they have the same nearness with those expresly and in terms forbidden to joyn in Marriage Relation together, are comprehended in that Law. When the Law expresly forbids the Nephew to Marry the Aunt, it implies that the Uncle may not Marry the Neece, because an Uncles Wife and an Aunts Husband are equally akin. It is (as Dr. Hall in his Cases of Conscience has well noted) easy to observe, that all the several [...]ies of the degrees prohibited run still upon the Male, under which the exorbitances of the other Sex are comprehended. Thus though a Mans Marrying his Wives Sister is not in so many express Words and Syllables prohibited, by clear implication and necessary Consequence it is so. It is a very weak Argument, to say, inasmuch as Marrying with the Wives Sister is not in terms forbidden in the 18 Chapter of Leviticus, that therefore it is lawful. A Mans Marrying with his own Daughter is not expresly forbidden in that Law: But since it is said, he may not Marry his Daughter in Law or his Sons Wife, Verse [...] by necessary deduction it follows, that he may not Marry his own Daughter. It is not in express terms said, that a Woman shall not Marry two Brothers: and it is certainly as lawful for a Woman to Marry two Brothers as for a Man two Sisters. Yet this is so highly against the light of Nature as well as Scripture, as that it [Page] was of old decreed in the Neocaesarian Council, that whosoever should do so, should be rejected unto death.

3. The Light of Nature and Laws of Nations have Condemned this Practice as Abominable. The Grecians, Romans and the Arabians, who had no light of Scripture, only the Law, written in their hearts by nature, did prohibit such Marriages. The Karcan Jews (who in Opposition to the Talmudists adhere to the Books of Meses) Condemn them. So have Christian Nations done: And in our own Nation in special. The Table of the Church of England set forth by Authority, does expresly declare, that a Man may not Marry with his Wives Sister. Mr. Reyner (that worthy Minister of the Gospel at Lincoln) in his Judicious Answer to the Case before us, shews, that the Laws of the Land prohibit this Marriage; and he refers his Reader for Information to Sir Ed. Cooks Institute, Part. 2. p. 683. And to the Statutes of 25 H.8. Chap 22. and his 28 year. Chapt. 7. and his 30 year Chap.38.

4. Learned Divines have with a great concurrence testifyed against such Marriage as unlawful. Zanchy observes, that all the Antient Fathers Witnessed against it. So have our Protestant Divines: Particularly Beza, Junius, Gerhard, Polanus, Bucanus, and the Geneva-Divines: Also, Zepperus, and Voetius: And of our own Nation, Mr. Perkins, Dr. Ames, Dr. Hall, Dr. Willet, Dr. Hamond. Likewise the English Annotators on Lev. [Page] 18.16. And Mr. Poole, and Mr. Clark in their Notes on that place. Yea, the Assembly at Westminster (in which were many Eminent Persons) in their Confession of Faith, Chap.24. Sect.4. have these words. Marriage ought not to be within the degrees of Consanguinity or Affinity forbidden in the word: Nor can such Incestuous Marriages be made lawful by any Law of Man, so as those Persons may live together as Man & Wife. The man may not Marry any of his Wives kindred nearer in Blood then he may of his own; nor the Woman of her Husbands kindred nearer in Blood than of her own. These are the words of that Renowned Assembly. Moreover it is well known that such Marriage was Condemned as unlawful, by the Universities of Europe in the days of K.Henry 8

As for the Objection that it is said, Lev.18.18. Thou shalt not take a Wife to her Sister to vex her besides the other in her life time. By Sister in that place not a natural Sister in a strict sense, but any other Woman is intended: The same expression in the Original is else where translated, One to another Ezek.1.9. The Hebrews are wont to give the name of Brother and Sister to all Neighbours, and more especially to all that are of the same Nation. Gen.19.7. Isa.19. 2. Ezek.16.45, 48. The Jews (as some Learned men have well observed) did sometimes take Second Wives, whilst the first was living, on purpose to vex the first Wife; which was a very great Wickedness. The design then of that Text is to prohibit [Page] Polygamy, but giveth no allowance to any man to Marry his Sister after his Wives Death.

Finally. That Practice is one of those Abominations, for which the Holy God punished the Heathen Nations: And it is a burning Shame, that ever it should be heard of in such a Land of Uprightness as New-England once was and ever ought to be. It is very sad, that a Practice which the Scripture calls Wickedness and Abomination, and which the light of Nature condemns, should find any Patrons amongst us. A great Divine has truly noted, that this is one of those iniquities which provokes the God of Heaven to send enemies upon a People, and to make their Land desolate. If after the Lord has stirred up his Servants in the Ministry to bear their Testimony against it, (and we hope their is no Minister in the Land either so ignorant, or under such a Penal and Judicial desertion of God as to justify it) men shall still go on openly to Practise a thing so vile, and that by the connivance of those who ought by Severe and Righteous Laws to inhibit it, We may fear what God will do.

INCREASE MATHER.

CHARLES MORTON.

JAMES ALLEN.

SAMUEL WILLARD.

JAMES SHERMAN.

JOHN DANFORTH.

COTTON MATHER.

NEHEMTAH WALTER.

§

§

[Page]

[Page]

THE ANSWER Of Several MINISTERS in and near BOSTON, To that Case of Conscience, Whether it is Lawful for a Man to Marry his Wives own Sister?

Boston in N. E. Printed and Sold by Bartholomew Green. 1695.

To the READER.

[Page]

THERE is no practice so evil as not to find Ad [...]es. It is astonishing that such a Scandal as that which is here impleaded, should have any fautors among professors of Religion in a Land of Light, when Heathen Nations have [...] it, although they had no other principle but the honesty of nature to guide them. Some pretend that Death puts an end to all Relations, and that therefore a Mans Wives Sister is no more his Sister after his Wives death, and consequently that he may Lawfully Marry her. But according to this allegation a mans Wives Mother is no more his Mother after his Wives death, and consequently he may Marry his Wives Mother: Nor then is his Fathers Wife or Step-Mother any more his Mother after his Fathers death, and consequently he may have his Fathers Wife; which is an impiety not so much as named amongst the [...] sort of Heathen. 1 Cor. 5. 1. Others [...], that indeed such Marriage is Sinful, but the [...] non debuit factum valet, when once they are Married they are not to be separated they think, which is a strange and contradictory Opinion. It is as [...] it should be affirmed, that because men have transgressed against the light of nature, they may do so [...], and l [...]ve in that sin though it be to the Eternal Damnation of their Souls. Such Marriages are[Page]wickedly Incestuous; and therefore to Question whether the Civil Authority may permit Persons so concerned to continue in Conjugal Communion, is, to make it a Question whether Magistrates may not indulge the most Scandalous transgressions of the Moral Law and so bring the guilt of those Crimes upon the Government, and upon the whole Land where they are perpetrated. Most certainly, when John the Baptist said to Herod, It is not Lawful for thee to have thy Brothers Wife, Mark 6. 18. his intendment was that they ought no longer to live together as Man and Wife. If Magistrates or any other shall be reproached for their Holy Zeal in this matter, they will Suffer Persecution in the very same cause for which John did. Moreover, we find in the Scripture that when some had contracted Marriages contrary [...] Law of God (and so have they all done that [...]ave Married their Wives Sister) it was not thought it would be sufficient for them to confess their fault, or to inhibit the like practice in others for the future, but the guilty Persons were made to put away all such Wives. Ezra 10. 3, 11. Neh. 13. 25.

But for further Information in this point, the Reader is referred to the Answer herewith Emitted, which in few words contains enough to satisfy the Consciences of them that Enquire without an Idol in their Hearts, or that are sincerely willing to be satisfyed.

Mrs. JUDITH HULL, Of Boston, in N. E. Daughter of Mr. Edmund Quincey; late Wife of JOHN HULL Esq. deceased.

[Page]

A Diligent, Constant, Fruitfull Reader and Hearer of the Word of GOD, [...] from her Labours, June, 22. 1695. being. the seventh day of the Week, a little before Sun-set; just about the time She used to begin the Sabbath. Anno AEtatis suae 69.

Epitaph

GReat Sarah's Faith; joind with Good Hannah's Prayer;

For Hearing of the Word, glad Maries Care;

Aged Elizabeths Just Walk; To dwell

Nigh Prophets, a true Shunamitish Zeal;

An Humble Soul, Trim'd with an High Neglect

Of Gay Things, but with Ancient Glories deck't;

All these Expir'd at once! Array'd with Them,

Our HULDAH's gone to Gods Jerusalem:

Without a Figure so, with her Last Breath

Shee Triumph'd o'er that Holophernes, DEATH.

Perfect in Thoughts, Words, Deeds, She soars on high,

Performing what her Name did signifie.

Information about this book

Title statement

The answer of several ministers in and near Boston, to that case of conscience, whether it is lawful for a man to marry his wives own sister?

Mather, Increase, 1639-1723.

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI :

Date

2006-06.

ID [DLPS]

N00598

ID [TCP]

N00598

ID [STC]

Evans 729

ID [STC]

Wing M1182

ID [NOTIS]

APX2906

ID [IMAGE-SET]

729

ID [EVANS-CITATION]

99019657

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early American Imprints, 1639-1800 ; no. 729.

Notes

(Evans-TCP ; no. N00598)

Transcribed from: (Readex Archive of Americana ; Early American Imprints, series I ; image set 729)

Images scanned from Readex microprint and microform: (Early American imprints. First series ; no. 729)

Source

— The answer of several ministers in and near Boston, to that case of conscience, whether it is lawful for a man to marry his wives own sister?, Mather, Increase, 1639-1723., Cambridge Association (Mass.)..

Extent

8, [2] p. ; 15 cm. (8vo)

Printed and sold by Bartholomew Green.,. Boston in N.E. :: 1695.. (The result of deliberations of the Cambridge Association.) (Signed on p. 8: Increase Mather [and seven others]. Attributed to Mather by Holmes.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.