AN HISTORY OF ENGLAND, IN A SERIES of LETTERS FROM A NOBLEMAN to his SON.

VOL. II.

Nec minimum meruere decus, vestigia Graeca
Aust deserere, & celebrare domestica facta.
HOR.

LONDON, Printed for J. NEWBERY, at the Bible and Sun, in St. Paul's Church-Yard. MDCCLXIV.

BOOKS printed for, and sold by, J. Newbery, at the Bible and Sun, in St. Paul's Church-Yard, LONDON.

  • 1. A New and Accurate SYSTEM of NATURAL HISTORY: Containing, 1. The History of Quadrupedes, including amphibious Animals, Frogs, and Lizards, with their Properties and Uses in Medicine. 2. The History of Birds, with the Method of bringing up those of the Singing Kind. 3. The History of Fishes and Serpents, including Sea-Turtles, Crustaceous and Shell-Fishes, with their Medicinal Uses. 4. The Histo­ry Insects, with their Properties and Uses in Medicine. 5. The History of Waters, Earths, Stones, Fossils, and Minerals, with their Virtues, Porperties, and Medicinal Uses: To which is added, the Method in which Linnaeus has treated these Subjects. 6. The History of Vegetables, as well Foreign as Indigenous, including an Account of the Roots, Barks, Woods, Leaves, Flowers, Fruits, Seeds, Resins, Gums, and concreted Juices; as also their Pro­perties, Virtues, and Uses in Medicine: Together with the Method of cultivating those planted in Gardens. By R. Brookes, M. D. In 6 Vol. Price 18s. sewed, or 1l. 1s. bound.
  • 2. The GENERAL GAZETTEER: Or, Compen­dious Geographical Dictionary. Containing a Description of all the Empires, Kingdoms, States, Republics, Pro­vinces, Cities, Chief Towns, Forts, Fortresses, Castles, Citadels, Seas, Harbours, Bays, Rivers, Lakes, Moun­tains, Capes, and Promontories in the known World; together with the Government, Policy, Customs, Man­ners, and Religion of the Inhabitants. The Extent, Bounds, and natural Productions of each Country; and the Trade, Manufactures, and Curiosities of the Cities and Towns; their Longitude, Latitude, Bearing, and Distances in English Miles from remarkable Places; as also the Sieges they have undergone, and the Battles that have been fought near them, down to this present Year. Including an authentic Account of the Counties, Cities, and Market-Towns in England and Wales; as also the Villages, with Fairs, the Days on which they [Page] are kept, according to the New Style, as well as the Cat­tle, Goods, and Merchandizes that are sold thereat. By R. Brookes, M. D. Price 6s. bound.
  • 3. New PRINCIPLES of GEOGRAPHY and NA­VIGATION. In two Parts. Part I. Containing the Theory of the true Figure and Dimensions of the Earth, deduced from actual Mensuration, and applied to a just Construction of Maps and Charts for Land and Sea Use, exemplified in a new geographical Chart for Europe, and a large Sea Chart to seventy Degrees of Latitude. Part II. Containing a Table of Meridional Parts, calculated for the Spheriod to every Minute of Latitude, from the Measure of a Degree at the Equator. Also, new astrono­mical Principles of Navigation. By Benjamin Martin. Price 10s. 6d. half bound.
  • 4. PHILOSOPHIA BRITANNICA: Or, A New and Comprehensive System of the Newtonian Philosophy, Astronomy, and Geography, in a Course of twelve Lec­tures, with Notes: Containing the Physical, Mechani­cal, Geometrical, and Experimental Proofs and Illustra­tions of Natural Science. Also a particular Account of the Invention, Structure, Improvement, and Uses of all the confiderable Instruments, Engines, and Machines; with new Calculations relating to their Nature, Power, and Operation. The whole collected and methodized from all the principal Authors, and public Memoirs, to the present Year. By B. Martin. The second Edition. In 3 Vol. Price 18s. bound.
  • 5. The English Works of Roger Ascham, Preceptor to Queen Elizabeth: Containing, 1. A Report of the Affairs of Germany, and the Emperor Charles's Court. 2. Toxo­philus, or the School for Shooting. 2. The Schoolmas­ter, or perfect Way of bringing up Youth, illustrated by the late learned Mr. Upton. 4. Letters to Queen Eliza­beth and others, now first published from the Manscripts, with Notes and Observations, and the Author's Life. By James Bennet, Master of the Boarding-School at Hoddes­don in Hertfordshire. Price 10s. 6d. sewed. In 4to.
FINIS.

[Page]THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND, IN A SERIES of LETTERS.

LETTER I.

NEVER did Monarch come to the throne of England with a greater va­riety of favourable concurrences than Charles I. He found himself possessed of a peaceful and flourishing king­dom, his right undisputed by any ri­val claimant, strengthened by an alliance with one of the most powerful Monarchs that ever reigned in France, whose sister he had married; and, to add to all this, he was loved by his subjects, whom he had won by his virtues and address.

[Page 2] But this was but a flattering prospect; the spirit of liberty was rouzed, and was resolved to oppose the ancient claims of Monarchs, who usurped their power in times of ignorance or danger, confirmed it by laws, and continued it by long prescription. Charles had been, from his infancy, taught to con­sider the royal privileges as sacred pledges, which it was his duty to defend: his father had implanted the doctrines of hereditary and indefeasible right early upon his mind. James only defended those doctrines by words, and it was soon the fate of Charles to assert them by action. It is the duty of every So­vereign to consider the genius and disposition of his people, as a father does that of his children, and to adapt his government to each conjuncture. Charles mistook that genius; he wanted to govern a people who had, for some time, learned to be free by maxims and precedents, that had their origin in times of ignorance and slavery.

He therefore began his reign with two of the most difficult projects that could be conceived; the one to succour the Protestants in Germany against the Emperor and Duke of Bavaria; the other to keep the royal prerogatives entire, without a national standing army. In order to effect these purposes, the house of commons was to be managed, who, as I have already described, from being the oppressed par­ty, were now willing, in turn, to become oppres­sors; who, from a detestation of Popery, had now overshot the mark, and were become Puritans. His first demand for the necessary supplies to carry on the war of the Palatinate in Germany, though un­dertaken at their own request, was answered with a petition for punishing Papists, and for an examina­tion into the grievances of the nation. Buckingham, who had been the late King's favourite, and who was still more caressed by the present Monarch, did not escape their censures: instead of granting the [Page 3] sums requisite, they employed the time in vain dis­putations and complaints, till the season for prose­cuting the intended campaign was elapsed. The King, therefore, at length wearied with their de­lays, and offended at their contempt of his demands, thought proper to dissolve a parliament which he could not bring to reason. In fact, the commons, at this time, complained of imaginary grievances, but the time was approaching when their complaints were to become real.

The ministers of the King had not yet forgot that kind of tax which was called a benevolence, and which had been often exacted from the subject in former reigns. Charles thought to avail himself of this method of procuring money, but at the same time coloured it over with a greater appearance of justice than any of his predecessors. He therefore determined to borrow money of such persons as were best able to lend, to whom, for this purpose, he di­rected letters, mentioning the sum. With this the people reluctantly complied; it was, in fact, a griev­ance, though authorised by a thousand precedents; but no precedent can give sanction to injustice. With this money a fleet was equipped and sent against Spain, but which returned without procuring either glory or advantage.

This ineffectual expedition demanded to be re­paired by a new supply greater than what extorted loans could produce, and another parliament was called for this purpose. The new parliament, upon this occasion, seemed even more refractory than the former, and appeared more willing to make or to com­plain of grievances than to grant money: but chiefly their resentment was directed against Buckingham, the royal favourite. Whenever the subjects attack the royal prerogative, they begin with the favourites of the crown; and wise Princes, sensible of this, sel­dom have any. Charles was not possessed of the [Page 4] art of making a distinction between friends and mini­sters; whoever was his favourite him he always en­trusted with the administration of affairs; he loved Buckingham, and undertook to defend him: to defend this nobleman was to share his reproach; two mem­bers of the house of commons, Diggs and Elliot, un­dertook to accuse him. The purport of the charge a­mounted to little more than that he had engrossed too much power for himself and his relations, and that he had applied a plaister to the late King's side which was supposed to be poisonous. They inveighed against the Duke from this frivolous accusation, and the King, in a passion, ordered them both to the Tower. This was an open act of violence, and should have been supported, or ever performed. The commons exclaimed, that their privileges were infringed; they protested that neither of the members had spoken any thing disrespectful of his Majesty, and began to publish their vindication. The King, who was ever ready to enter upon harsh measures, but not to sup­port them, released the two members, and this com­pliance confirmed that obstinacy which his former injury had contributed to raise. The Earl of Arun­del, for being guilty of the same offence in the house of Lords, was imprisoned and dismissed in the same manner by the King. The two houses having in this manner answered the royal demands for mo­ney, the King, rather than give up the Duke, chose to be without the supply, and therefore once more dissolved the parliament.

He had now a war to maintain, which he was engaged in by the advice of those very members who refused to contribute to its support; besides this, he was to put the kingdom in a proper posture of de­fence, and he wanted money to execute these pur­poses. To furnish the proper supplies he again had recourse to loans, and to granting protections to the Papists, for stipulated sums of money: such as re­fused [Page 5] had soldiers billetted upon them, contrary to the customs of England; and even some were en­rolled for soldiers themselves. Persons of birth and rank were summoned to appear before the council, and, upon their persisting in a refusal, were put into confinement. We now once more perceive the seeds of discord beginning to shoot forth: we now see, as in every other civil war, both parties guilty of in­justice, yet on either side that injustice arising from principles of virtue; the one actuated by the inhe­rent liberties of mankind, the other by the prescrip­tive privileges of the crown: such is the general lot of humanity, to have their actions degenerate from the producing motives.

The King, now finding that nothing but the pros­pect of immediate danger could induce some future parliament to provide necessary supplies, was resolved to make a rupture with France, a war against which had ever been an expedient of producing unanimity at home. With this view he sent out Buckingham with a fleet to relieve Rochelle, a maritime town in that kingdom, which had long enjoyed its privileges independent of the French King, and which he was now actually preparing to deprive them of. This expedition was equally fruitless with that to the coasts of Spain; the Duke knew nothing of the art of war, and consumed his time in besieging a little fort in the isle of Rhee, from whence he was driven with the loss of half his army. The bad success of this served to render the unfortunate Duke still more obnoxious, and the King more needy; another parliament was therefore called, and a supply demanded in the usual form. The commons, in the first parliament, had begun with fictitious grievances, but their refusing then to contribute the supplies soon introduced an actual abuse of power, and rendered the King un­just, who, probably, only desired to be easy. He ex­torted supplies, and imprisoned the refractory. The [Page 6] complaints of the commons were now real; their members had been imprisoned, loans had been ex­torted; a tax upon merchandize, called tonnage and poundage, had been exacted without parliamentary authority; and, last of all, the Duke of Bucking­ham was still suffered to rule the councils of the King, and inflame every proceeding. In this situa­tion they seemed, as usual, resolved to grant no mo­ney till their grievances were redressed, and till the King had given a positive assurance to maintain the liberties of the subject. The King promised both, and they voted him a liberal supply, upon which they were prorogued, as was customary. This fresh supply enabled his Majesty to make another attempt to relieve Rochelle, and the Duke of Buckingham was again to have the command: Buckingham had ever be­haved with some haughtiness, as being secure of the King's protection; but his greatest fault seemed to be too large a share of power, which gave offence to every order. It is the aim of all malecontents in a state rather to bring the great down to their own level, than to exalt the inferior order to theirs: and this might be a motive to the lords and commons for attempting to retrench Buckingham's power. The clamour raised against him in the house was not lost among the people; they re-echoed it from one to the other, and the Duke had a million of foes only from his seeming prosperity. Among this number was one John Felton, an Irishman, a lieutenant in the army; this man was naturally melancholy, cou­rageous, and enthusiastic; he felt for his country as if labouring under a calamity which he thought it in the power of his single arm to remove: he resolved to kill the Duke, and thus to do a service both to God and man. Animated with mistaken patriotism and gloomy zeal, he reached Portsmouth, where the Duke was then, surrounded with his levee, giving the necessary orders to embark. Felton came up a­mong [Page 7] the crowd and stabbed him with a long knife to the heart; the Duke instantly fell dead, and Fel­ton walked composedly away; but his hat had fallen off while he was striking the blow, and this produced his discovery. He disdained denying a murder in which he gloried, and averred that he looked upon the Duke as an enemy to his country, and, as such, deserving to suffer. We shall see through the course of this reign several instances of great virtues and enormous vices, for the genius of England was at this time arrived at its highest pitch.

The expedition to Rochelle again returned with­out success, as if it had been ordered by fate that no­thing was to put the people into good humour. The contest therefore between privilege and prerogative was now carried on with the same acrimony as be­fore. Tonnage and poundage was exacted by the King as a right belonging to the crown, and refused by the merchants as a tax that could only be granted by the people. The parliament was called to deter­mine the dispute, but, instead of discussing that ar­gument, they entered upon disputes about religion. The house was mostly composed of Puritans, and such were for abolishing Episcopacy, and persecuting Papists. They were freed from Buckingham; but there was another favourite whom they dreaded still more, Laud Archbishop of Canterbury, a great fa­vourer of the opinion of Divine right, and firmly attached to the rites of the church as then establish­ed. They seemed willing to allow the King no fa­vourite, and therefore loudly murmured against this Bishop. Their indignation, however, was, for a while, called off to another object, which was con­sidered as a new act of violence in the King. His customhouse officers had seized upon the goods of one or two merchants who refused to pay tonnage and poundage. The Judges, in the former reign of James I, had adjudged this tax to belong to the [Page 8] crown without consent of parliament. The former reign therefore had been the proper time for disput­ing the King's right, but the commons had then not so much power, or such a spirit of resistance as now. They were now perfectly sensible of their own strength, and were resolved to fix the limits between the King and the people. They therefore boldly and warmly remonstrated against the King's proceeding; and he in return imprisoned four of the members, and dis­solved the parliament. These were the causes which soon after overturned the state, and laid the throne in blood.

I am, &c.

LETTER II.

AMonarchical government has ever been looked upon as best, when wisely administered. We are so constituted by nature that some are born to command, and others to obey. In a republic, how free soever, the people cannot govern themselves, and their leaders must be tyrants over their own narrow circle of subjects. In a monarchy the Governor is placed at a distance from the many, as he is but one; in a republic the tyrants are near, because they are many. In the former the people are subject to oppression from errors of will; in the latter, to be harrassed by the rigours of the law: in a mo­narchy the redress of grievances is speedy; in a re­public, dilatory and uncertain: in the one, punish­ments are few; in the other, severe and numerous, from the debility of the constitution.

The present parliament, seemed not so intent upon abridging the King's power, as upon en­tirely abolishing it; they were Calvinists, and it is [Page 9] the spirit of Calvinism to throw off the restraints of royalty. The English had lately seen this happily effected in Switzerland and Holland, and, influ­enced by such examples, seemed desirous of imita­tion.

You have seen the King and the English parlia­ment now almost prepared for an open rupture; still, however, the commons kept within the bounds of humble remonstrance, and, while they refused his Majesty's demands, asked pardon for their delay. They had still a respect for their Monarch, which even their republican principles could not entirely efface; and, though they were willing to wound, yet they feared to strike an open blow. The Scotch soon set them an example of resistance; they had, in that kingdom, long embraced the Calvinistical doctrines; and, though they still had Bishops, these were reduced to poverty, and treated with contempt. James I. attempted to exalt the Bishops, and to introduce the rites and the liturgy of the church of England among them, but died in the midst of his endeavours. Charles, therefore, was resolved to complete what his father had begun. This unnecessary and ill­judged attempt alienated the affections of his Scotoh subjects. The sedition past from city to city; the Calvinists formed a league, as if all the laws, divine and human, were infringed; while the desire in the court party of supporting their commands, and, in the people, of defending their religion, soon, excited, actually, in Scotland, those dangers which in Eng­land were, as yet, only apprehended.

In such a situation the King could only repress the presumption of his Scotch subjects by the assist­ance of those of England; but he had lately dissolu­ed his parliament, and seemed no way disposed to call another; he had cut off the sources of every supply in cases of emergency, and fondly hoped he [Page 10] could govern by merely the terror of royalty. His favourites helped to confirm his errors; they were fond of arbitrary power, because they shared its in­dulgences; the privy council considered itself as absolute; the Star-Chamber, as it was called, se­verely punished all who denied the prerogative royal; the High Commission court now turned from defend­ing the Papists against the Puritans, whom they justly feared, as tinctured with the spirit of resist­ance. The very Judges also, being chosen by the court, were entirely devoted to the King; so that all conspired to lift him above justice, and induced him to call parliaments no more, whose maxims of go­vernment he found diametrically opposite to his own.

He was therefore resolved to fix upon other me­thods of raising money: methods indeed which were practised by his predecessors, but at times when they had power to controll even justice, and force to com­pel their subjects to obey. Charles, in the midst of a civil war in Scotland, and the discontents of his people at home, at a time when one half of his sub­jects were preaching sedition, and the other half were learning to despise Kings; without army, and without treasures; resolved to reign with arbitrary power.

With the taxes which he levied without parlia­ments in England, he undertook to bring about the reformation in Scotland; and therefore began, as his parliament was now no more, to collect a tax upon the subject called Ship-money. This is that fa­mous tax which first rouzed a whole nation, after an unsettled constitution of more than a thousand years, at length to fix and determine the bounds of their own freedom, and the King's prerogative.

To give a sanction to the royal orders, this tax was backed by the opinion of all the Judges, who voted it to be customary and legal. Their opinion [Page 11] will, at once, serve to explain the nature of this tax, and what they judged concerning it. It ran thus, We, every man by himself, and all of us together, have taken into serious consideration the case and question concerning Ship-money; and it is our opinion, that when the good and safety of the Kingdom in general is concerned, and the Kingdom in danger, that your Majesty may, by writ under the great seal of England, command all your subjects of this your kingdom, at their charge, to provide and furnish such number of ships with men, victuals, and ammunition, and for such time as your Majesty shall think fit, for the defence and safety of this Kingdom from such danger and peril: And that, by law, your Majesty may compel the doing thereof, in case of refusal or refractoriness: And we are also of opinion, that in such case your Majesty is the sole judge both of the danger, and when and how the same is to he prevented and avoided, &c.

An order from the throne, thus backed by the opi­nion of all the Judges, it was thought, would be, at once, complied with; but the King was deceived. A private man, of courage and integrity, one John Hampden, stood forth as a champion for the people, and refused to pay a tax not authorized by parlia­ment. The sum at which he was rated amounted to but twenty shillings, yet he refused to contribute even this, and brought his cause before the court of Exchequer. Never was a greater cause argued in any court before. The Judges, by their sentence, were to determine whether the nation, and their posterity, were to be subject to arbitrary power, or to enjoy freedom. The Judges determined in favour of servitude; Hampden was cast; and this only served to increase the discontents of the people.

The discontent and opposition the King found among his English subjects, one would have thought, might serve to repress his ardour for reformation in the religion of Scotland. Having published an or­der [Page 12] for reading the liturgy in the principal church in Edinburgh, the people received it with clamours and imprecations; the court-party blamed their obstinacy, as the innovations were trifling; but this was re­torted against themselves with still greater force, for labouring so earnestly at the establishment of trifles. The sedition in that kingdom, which had hitherto been secret, was now kept concealed no longer; rebellion had, as it were, set up its standard amongst them. Yet still the King could not resolve to desist from his design; and so prepossessed was he in favour of royal right, that he thought the very name of a King would influence them to return to duty. He was soon undeceived; the Scotch Calvinists, whose principles were republican, entered into a covenant to suppress the Bishops, and resist the King's autho­rity. This was judged an open declaration of war, and Charles summoned the Nobility of England, who held lands of the crown, to furnish a proper number of forces to suppress them. To add to his supplies, he demanded a voluntary contribution from the Clergy, and by means of his Queen the Catholics also were pressed for their assistance. By these me­thods he found himself at the head of an undisci­plined and reluctant army, amounting to about twenty thousand men, commanded by Generals more willing to negotiate than to fight. However, his superiority of number gave him a manifest advan­tage over the malecontents, who were not slow in marching to oppose him. Charles had inherited the peaceful disposition of his father; he was unwilling to come to extremities, although a blow, then struck with vigour, might have prevented many of his suc­ceeding misfortunes. Instead of fighting, he entered upon a treaty; a suspension was concluded upon, and terms agreed to, that neither side intended to preserve. This suspension, and disbanding the ar­mies, [Page 13] was a fatal step to the King; the Scotch forces could be again mustered at pleasure; the English troops, not without time, difficulty, and expence. Of this the malecontents were sensible, and the ne­gotiations met with obstructions in proportion as they were confident of their power. In short, after much altercation, and many treaties signed, and broken, both parties once more resolved upon a war.

War being resolved on, the King now took every method to raise money for maintaining it. Ship-money was levied as before; some other arbitrary taxes were exacted with great severity; but one method of in­creasing supplies reflects immortal honour upon those who granted them. His counsellors and servants lent the King whatever sums they could spare, and dis­tressed their private fortunes to serve the state. Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Marquis of Ha­milton, contributed very large sums; but particular­ly Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, gave his Majesty twenty thousand pounds. Wentworth was one of those great characters which marked those celebrated times. Upon his first appearance in the state he was foremost in the opposition to the crown; but, finding his confederates had mixed a spirit of en­thusiasm with their regards for liberty, he left their side to take that of the King, which he fancied in greatest danger. He was brave, wise, and loyal, and followed the King from principle, yet without en­tirely approving his conduct.

These were the resources of the crown to prepare for a Scotch war, but they were still insufficient; and there was but one method more to furnish larger supplies, namely, by calling a parliament. It was now eleven years since Charles had called any. The ungovernable spirit of the last had taught him to hate and to fear such an assembly. His wants, how­ever, at length, induced him to constrain his indig­nation, [Page 14] and, by the advice of his Council, he called another, the members of which were still more tur­bulent than the former, as they now had still stronger reasons for their discontent. The house of com­mons could not be induced to treat the Scotch, who were of the same principles, and contended for the same cause, as their enemies. They looked upon them as friends and brothers, who only rose to teach them how to defend their privileges. The King could reap no other fruits, therefore, from this as­sembly, but murmurings and complaints; every me­thod he had taken to supply himself with money was declared an abuse. Tonnage and poundage, ship­money, the sale of monopolies, the billetting sol­diers upon the citizens were all voted stretches at ar­bitrary power. The Star-chamber gave particular offence, and instead of subsidies the house presented the King with nothing but their grievances. Charles once more dissolved this parliament, and thus aggra­vated the discontents of the people.

He had now made enemies of the Scotch nation, and of the commons of England; it remained to of­fend the city of London; upon their refusing to lend him a sum of money to carry on the war, he sued them in the Star-chamber for some lands in Ireland, and made them pay a considerable fine. He conti­nued to exact all the taxes against which the parlia­ment had so frequently remonstrated; even had he been despotic, such a conduct would have shook him on the throne; but, limited as he was, it served to complete his overthrow. He could expect little assistance from England; and the Scotch, sensible of their own influence in that part of his dominions, led an army of twenty thousand men as far as New­castle upon Tyne, in order to seize upon, or to de­throne him. Having thus prepared his misfortunes, he found himself again obliged to call the last parlia­ment, which completed his ruin.

[Page 15] Instead of granting money, this new parliament, as all the rest had done, began by demanding to have their grievances redressed; they desired an abo­lition of the Star chamber; exclaimed against arbi­trary taxes, and particularly ship-money; and, in fine, demanded that a new parliament should be called every three years. Charles was now obliged to grant those demands from necessity, which in the beginning of his reign he might have bestowed as a favour. He expected to regain his authority by complying, but he was deceived; nothing could satisfy the commons but the total abolition of his power. He expected that his English subjects would repress the inso­lence of those of Scotland, but had the mortifica­tion to find the house of commons approve their conduct, and repay their irruption with a reward of three hundred thousand pounds. He hoped to repress the Puritanical party in England, but found, to his surprize, almost the whole house of commons of that persuasion. He loved the Earl of Strafford with ten­derness, and esteemed his wisdom; and the house of commons, conscious of his regards, accused the Earl of high treason. When we attempt innovation, we seldom know how far our schemes will extend at last. This parliament began with redressing grievances; they proceeded to reform the state, and ended in to­tally destroying the constitution.

I am, &c.

LETTER. III.

IN treating of a subject, in which almost every Englishman is partial, it is no easy matter to avoid falling into their errors; but, I have labour­ed to view this part of our history, without receiving any biass from party; and our constitution is now sufficiently established, whatever we may think of this Monarch's equity, or his subjects resolution. Our laws, at present, differ both from what Charles endeavoured to maintain, and what his parliaments pretended to enact: we now are all agreed, that the unlimited power arrogated on one side, and the tu­multuous freedom introduced on the other, are both intolerable; yet, of the two, perhaps, despotism is superior. In a republic, the tyrant is in our village, in our family; perhaps, in a monarchy, he lives at a distance: the oppressions of a Monarch are gene­rally exerted only in the narrow sphere round him; the oppressions of the governors of a republic, though not so flagrant, are more universal: the Monarch is apt to commit great enormities, but they seldom reach the multitude at humble distance from the throne; the republican Despot oppresses the multitude that lies within the circle of his influence: the Monarch terrifies me with great evils which I may never feel; the Despot actually loads me with submissions, which I am constantly obliged to sustain; and, in my opi­nion, it is much better to be in danger of having my head chopped off, with an ax, once in my life, than to have my leg gauled with a continual fetter.

Whatever were the reasonings of the King, upon this subject, it is certain, his actions were intended for the benefit of his subjects; but he continued to rule them, upon the maxims of former princes, at a time that the principles of the subjects were totally changed. The house of commons seemed now to have thrown off all subordination; they not only ar­raigned [Page 17] and attained almost all the King's mini­sters; particularly Laud, Strafford, Finch, and Winde­banck; but passed an act to make that parliament con­tinual, until all grievances should be redressed. The King complied with every measure, yet all his com­pliance only served to increase their demands. The Earl of Strafford first fell a victim to their popular fury: the commons exhibited an accursation, of twen­ty-eight articles against him; the substance of which was, That he had attempted to extend the King's authority at home, and had been guilty of several ex­actions in Ireland. These received the name of high treason, and the people without demanded justice. The managers for the house of commons pleaded, with vehemence, against him at the bar of the house of Lords, who were his Judges: they insisted, that, though each article seperately did not amount to a proof, yet, the whole taken together carried convic­tion. This is a method of arguing frequently used in the English courts of justice, even to this day; and, perhaps, none can be more erroneous; for almost every falshood may thus be defended by a multiplici­ty of weak reasons. In this tumult of aggravation and clamour, the Earl himself, whose parts and wis­dom had long been respected and acknolwedged, stood unmoved. He defended his innocence with all the presence of mind, judgment, and temper, that could be expected from innocence and ability. His little children were placed near him, as he was thus de­fending his own cause, and that of his master: after he had, with a long and eloquent speech, delivered extempore, confuted the accusation of his enemies, he thus drew to a conclusion, But, my Lords, I have troubled you too long; longer than I should have done, but, for the sake of those dear pledges, a saint, in heaven, has left me.—Upon this he paused, dropped a tear, look­ed upon his children, and then proceeded.—What I [Page 18] forfeit, for myself, is a trifle; that my indiscretions should reach my posterity, wounds me to the heart. Pardon my infirmity.—Something I should have added, but am not able; therefore, let it pass. And now, my Lords, for myself, I have long been taught, that the affictions of this life are overpaid by that eternal weight of glory, which awaits the innocent; and so, my Lords, even so, with the utmost tranquility I submit my­self to your judgment. Whether that judgment be life, or death. TE DEUM LAUDAMUS.’ His eloquence and innocence seemed to influence his Judges: the King himself went to the house of Lords, and spoke in his defence; but the spirit of the people was excited, and nothing, but his blood, would give them satis­faction. He was condemned by both houses, and nothing now remained, but for the King to give his consent to the bill of attainder. But his consent seemed of little consequence; the limits of royalty were long since broken down, and imminent dangers might attend his refusal. While he continued in this agitation of mind, not knowing how to behave, he received a letter from the unfortunate Nobleman himself, desiring that his life might be made the sa­crifice of a mutual agreement between the King and the people; adding, that to a willing mind there could be no injury. This noble instance of gene­rosity was but ill repaid; the King was persuaded to give his consent; he signed the fatal bill; Straf­ford was beheaded; and this taught his subjects soon after to spill blood that was still more precious.

The whole kingdom now seemed to be in a fer­ment; all the petitions of parliament, which were in reality calculated to abase the King, were not­withstanding drawn up with the most seeming affec­tion and obedience; they were constantly complain­ing in each of these of their fears for the church, at the very time that they were themselves labouring its overthrow. Faction ran high. In the King's party [Page 19] there was an ill-projected and worse conducted de­sign of keeping the prerogative as much untouched as ever it had been in the reigns of the most fortu­nate and formidable Monarchs; in the opposite par­ty a fixed resolution of turning the state into a re­public, and changing the government, of the church into that of presbytery.

In the midst of these troubles, the Papists of Ire­land fancied they found a convenient opportunity of throwing off the English yoke. Religion and liberty often inspire the most attrocious actions; and they did so now. The Papists took a resolution, of which we find many horrid examples in history. They at­tempted to cut off all the Protestants in that king­dom at one blow. Not less than forty thousand per­sons fell a sacrifice upon this occasion. In such a number of murders cruelty put on a thousand differ­ent shapes; rapes, burnings, and tortures were prac­tised in every part of that miserable island; and all the Protestants perished who had not the good for­tune to make early provision for their safety. Such was the state of Ireland then, and such was England shortly to be. The parliament took this opportunity to blacken the King, as if he had given sanction to the Papists, and encouraged their barbarous design; he vindicated himself with a zeal that nothing but innocence could inspire; and tried every method of assisting his Protestant subjects of Ireland. He even demanded succours from the parliament of Scotland to relieve the Irish Protestants; but they remitted him to the parliament of England, as Ireland lay more immediately under their protection. The English house of commons sent but feeble succours to a peo­ple they pretended to deplore, and gave it as a pre­text, that the government at home was in danger.

They now proceeded to what they long laboured at, to establish a republic, and destroy the rites of the [Page 20] church of England. They signified to the King, that it was fit to have a privy council only of their appointing. Three members of the house of com­mons presented this request on their knees. The King was pleased to grant all. Oliver Cromwell, who was then in the house of commons, was heard to declare, that, if this request was rejected, he would sell his estate, which was then but small, and retire out of the kingdom.

Hitherto, it is probable, both sides were actuated rather by principle than ambition. The Bishops had hitherto adhered closely to the King; they were not only expelled the house of Lords, but, upon remon­strating against this unconstitutional measure, were accused by the house of commons of high treason, and ten of them sent to the Tower. This spirit of epidemic rage was not confined to both houses of parliament alone; the populace daily surrounded the place of sitting, and, with tumultuous cries, demand­ed justice. The apprentices, the common-council, and the citizens of London were foremost in this struggle for liberty, as they thought it; their prin­ciples were sincere; for the motives of a mob, though often wrong, are always honest. In this contest the Presbyterians, and Cardinal Richelieu of France, were ever intriguing; both desired a civil war, the one willing to depress the great, the other to humble the kingdom.

In this decline of the royal authority, the King was persuaded to take a step which was fatal to his interests. By the advice of Lord Digby, one of his ministers, he went himself to the house of commons, and accused five of its members of high treason. These were the leading members of the house, whom he thus ventured to call in question; namely, Lord Kimbolton, Mr. Hollis, Sir Arthur Haslerig, Mr. Pym, Mr. Hampden, and Mr. Strode. He sat, for some time, in the speaker's chair, to see if the ac­cused [Page 21] were present; but they had escaped a few mi­nutes before his entry; and the house of commons was resolved to support the cause. Disappointed, perplexed, unknowing whom to rely on, the King went next to the common-council of the city, and made his complaint to them; the common-council only answered by aggravating his former misconduct. From thence he went to Windsor, where, reflecting upon the rashness of his former proceeding, he wrote to the parliament, informing them, that he desisted from his proceedings aginst the accused members, and as­suring the parliament, that upon all occasions he would be as careful of their privileges as of his life or his crown. His violence (as a fine writer remarks) had first ren­dered him hateful to his common,s and his submis­sion now contemptible.

The commons had already stripped the King of al­most all his privileges; the power of appointing go­vernors, generals, and levying armies, still remain­ed. They therefore proceeded to petition, that the Tower might be put into their hands; that Hull, Portsmouth, and the fleet, should be commanded by persons of their chusing. These requests were, at first, contested, and then complied with; at last the commons desired to have a militia raised, and go­verned by such officers and commanders as they should nominate, under a pretext of securing them from the Irish Papists, whom they affected to be in dread of. This was depriving the King of even the shadow of his former power; but they had gone too far now to recede, and feared leaving him any power, as knowing themselves the first objects on which its vengeance might be exercised. He was willing to grant the raising a militia, but insisted upon giving it commanders; the parliament desired to command it for an appointed time; but the King, at last pro­voked to resentment, cried, they should not com­mand it, no not for an hour. This peremptory refusal [Page 22] broke off all further treaty, and both sides were now to have recourse to arms.

Charles retired to York, and the Queen went over to Holland, to raise money upon the crown jewels, and provide ammunition and forces. The parliament, in the mean time, were not idle; they knew their strength and popularity, and published proposals for bringing in money or plate for the de­fence of the kingdom. But, though each side were prepared for war, yet they took every precaution to lay the blame of the first infraction of peace on each other. The King offered proposals to the commons which he knew they would not accept; and they, in return, offered him nineteen propositions, which, if complied with, would render him entirely subser­vient to their commands. Their import was, that the privy council, the principal officers of state, the governors of the King's children, forts, castles, fleet, armies, should be all appointed or governed by par­liament; that Papists should be punished by thei [...] authority; that the church and liturgy should be re­formed by their discretion; and that such member [...] as had been displaced for former offences should b [...] restored. These proposals, which, if they had bee [...] accepted, would have moulded the government int [...] an aristocratical form, were, happily for posterity [...] rejected; and the King and his parliament continue [...] to reproach each other for a civil war, of which bot [...] were actually guilty.

I am, &c.

LETTER IV.

IN this detail of public calamities you are not [...] expect any great strokes, either in politics [...] war; each party was too sincere to give much a [...] tention to any thing but the dictates of passion, e [...] thusiasm, [Page 23] or zeal. The parliament was convinced that it drew the sword in defence of liberty; and the King was equally stedfast in believing, that he had the authority of Heaven for opposing their pre­tensions. They therefore took the field with little conduct; and courage alone in the troops generally decided the fortune of the day.

The parliament, from its own authority, consti­tuted Sir John Hotham, a sitting member of the house of commons, governor of Hull. In this city there was a large magazine of arms, ammunition, and provisions. The King, sensible of the importance of the place, was desirous of securing it for himself; he therefore approached the gates with three hun­dred horse, and demanded entrance. Hotham still preserved some appearance of respect to his sove­reign, land, on his knees, refused to admit him. Disloyalty is ever timid in the beginning.

Manifestoes, on one side and the other, were now dispersed through the whole kingdom, and the people were universally divided into two factions, that went by the names of Royalists and Round-heads. The King ordered the Nobility to attend his person; he procured the great seal from London, and erected his standard at Nottingham. The people, in general, seemed to have lost all respect to his person and go­vernment; the laws promulgated by parliament, without the sanction of the great seal, were ob­served with due obedience; and the royal standard was scarce followed by any except a few militia. At length, however, with the succours furnished by his Queen, and the presents of the university of Ox­ford, and his Clergy, he raised an army of about fourteen thousand men, commanded by Prince Ru­pert, a man of courage and some experience. The parliament, which disposed of the money of the nation, had one still more numerous, commanded [Page 24] by the Earl of Essex, who fought from principle, and who only wished to bring the King to reason.

When the King advanced from Nottingham, and approached near Shrewsbury, he drew up his little army, and made them a speech: ‘"I promise, said he to the soldiers, in the presence of Almighty God, and as I hope for his blessing and protection, that I will ever defend the Protestant religion, and in that religion am re­solved to live and die. The laws of the land, and the rights of my subjects, shall ever be the measure of my go­vernment; and, if Heaven prospers this little army raised for their King's defence, I promise to rule by parliaments alone, and by every equitable administration. When I fail in these particulars, then let me be abandoned of men; and in this resolution I hope for the assistance of all good men, end am confident of the protection of Providence.

Essex, on the other hand, was resolved to set up his head-quarters at Worcester, and await the King; where, in a few days, a skirmish ensued in favour of the Royalists; and the battle of Edge-hill, fought some time after, seemed to confirm the King's supe­riority. The Queen had brought him soldiers from Holland, with ammunition and arms, and immediately departed in order to furnish more. Yet still the par­liament was not discouraged; their demands seemed to increase in proportion to their losses; and, as they were defeated in the field, they grew more obstinate in the cabinet. They condemned of high treason such governors of towns as gave up their fortresses to the King; while he, on the contrary, offered new terms of peace upon every advantage. But, though his desire to spare his subjects was laudable, as a man, yet his long negotiations were faulty, as a warrior; he wasted that time in altercation and proposal, which should have been employed in vi­gorous exertions in the field. Upon the whole, his first campaign seemed to promise him success; his [Page 25] generals were mostly victorious, and his army far superior to the enemy in point of discipline. On the side of the parliament, the great Hampden was slain in the battle of Chaldgrave-field; and on the other hand, on the King's part, the gallant Lord Faulk­land was killed at the battle of Newbury. These were the two greatest, bravest, and wisest men of their time, who thus fell, as if, by the kindness of Providence, to prevent their seeing the miseries, and the slaughter in which their country was shortly to be involved.

Hampden was the person who had refused paying ship-money, and withstood the power of the crown; his inflexible integrity gained him the esteem even of his enemies; and his humanity and benevolence, the affection of all that knew him more intimately.

But Faulkland was still a greater character than he. He added to Hampden's severe principles all the politeness and elegance then known in Europe. He had withstood the King while he saw him mak­ing an ill use of his power; but, when he perceived the design of the parliament to change religion, he changed his side, and stedfastly attached himself to the crown. From the beginning of the civil war his natural chearfulness and vivacity grew clouded, and he became sad, pale, and negligent of his per­son; the morning of the battle it was seen he de­sired to die, and he professed that the miseries of his country had already almost broken his heart. He added, that he was weary of the times, and should leave them before night. He was shot with a mus­quet in the belly, and his body was the next morn­ing found among an heap of the slain. His writings, his justice, and his courage, deserved such a death of glory; and they lound it. If there be happiness in death, it must be in such an end, falling in battle for our King and our principles.

[Page 26] Each battle served only to weaken the royal party, and to unite the parliament more strongly together; the King and his followers were held together only by secular motives; the parliament had long been actuated by one still stronger, that of religion; this had hitherto been the secret spring of all their com­motions, and now they fairly threw by the mask, united themselves to the church of Scotland, and signed the solemn league and covenant, which esta­blished Puritanism, and laid the foundation of a new republic. The King, to oppose the designs of the Westminster parliament, called one at Oxford, where it assembled; and England now saw what it had ne­ver before seen, two parliaments sitting at one and the same time. From this partial parliament he re­ceived some supplies; after which it was prorogued, and never after convened. The war went on with its usual fury, and skirmishes on both sides were fre­quent, which served to desolate the kingdom with­out deciding victory. Each county joined that side to which it was addicted from motives of conviction, interest or fear; while some observed a perfect neutrality. Several frequently petitioned for peace, the wise and the good were most earnest in this cry; but what particularly deserved remark was, the at­tempt of the women of London, who, to the num­ber of two or three thousand, went in a body to the house of commons, earnestly demanding a peace: Give us those traitors, said they, that are against peace; give them, that we may tear them in pieces. The guards found some difficulty in quelling this insurrection, and one or two women lost their lives in the fray.

It is both tedious and unimproving to describe all the combats, the battles, the skirmishes, that every day passed between either side. What towns were be­sieged and taken, how many killed in fight, or what numbers died by the hand of the executioner; every civil war presents the same picture to the imagina­tion; [Page 27] and this was aggravated with all the miseries of rage, resentment, and despair. All were from principle earnestly employed in destroying the consti­tution; there were none of those refined understand­ings, who, disengaged from the prejudices of party, improved the universal prejudice of the time to ac­quire dominion for themselves; all were seriously, earnestly, and blindly engaged in the favourite pur­suit. The genius of the times was great but irregular.

Among the number who most severely felt the in­dignation of the commons, was the famous William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury; he had been im­prisoned in the Tower, at the time when nine more of the Bishops were sent there upon remonstrating to the Lords against the severity of the lower house. When he was brought to the bar, in order to make his defence, he spoke several hours with that cou­rage which is the result of innocence and integrity. The Lords, his Judges, were willing to acquit him; but the commons were determined upon his death, and over-ruled all remonstrances made in his favour. When brought to the scaffold, this noble divine, without any apparent terror, made the people a long speech; he told them, ‘"that he had examined his heart, and thanked God that he found no sins there which deserved the death he was going to suffer. The King had been traduced by some, as labouring to introduce Popery; but that he be­lieved him as sound a Protestant as any man in the kingdom; and as for parliaments, though he disliked the conduct of one or two, yet he never designed to change the laws of the country, or the Protestant religion."’ After he had prayed for a short space, the executioner did his office at [...]e blow. This man seemed born for a better on fate and better times; but all distinctions of right and wrong were now lost in mutual animosity; and in general the best characters on both sides were those [Page 28] who fell victims to civil fury. He was learned, up­right, and sincere; humble in his private deport­ment, but attached to trifling ceremonies, and ready to lose his life rather than give them up.

The liturgy was, by a public act, abolished the day he died, as if he had been the only obstacle to its former removal. The church of England was rendered completely Presbyterian, to the great satis­faction of the Scots, and numbers of the citizens of London. An ordinance was established, by which there should be one day in the week appointed as a fast, and the money which was thus spared to the family, was to be paid in support of the common cause. Thus strengthened, the parliament seem­ed capable of carrying on their designs in an arbitra­ry manner; they had the Scotch to assist them; they professed only one religion, and were united with the bonds of mutual danger. However, from the mo­ment they came to be all ranked under the denomi­nation of Presbyterians, they began again to sepa­rate into new parties, as if divisions were necessary to the existence of this parliament; one part of the house were Presbyterians, strictly so called; the other Independants, a new sect that had lately been intro­duced, and gained ground surprisingly. The differ­ence between these two sects would hardly be worth mentioning, did not their religious opinions influ­ence their political conduct. The church of Eng­land, which was now totally abolished, had appoint­ed Bishops and a book of common prayer; the Presbyterians exclaimed against both; they were for having the church governed by clergymen elected by the people. The Independants went yet still far­ther, and excluded all clergy; they maintained that every man might pray in public, exhort his audi­ence, and explain the scriptures; but their chief dif­ference lay in acknowledging no subordination in se­cular employments, and attempting to maintain an [Page 29] ideal equality, to which they justly observed that every man was born. Were such a plan of govern­ment practicable, it would no doubt be the most happy; but the wise and powerful must ever govern over ignorance and debility, and the bad success of their schemes, soon after carried into execution, shewed how ill adapted they were to human infir­mity. Possessed, however, with an high opinion of their speculative scheme, they behaved with that mo­rose and sullen carriage which is ever the result of narrow manners and solitary thinking. They se­cretly laboured the abasement of the Presbyterians, yet joined them in their efforts to depress the King.

Charles, now perceiving the parliaments of England and Scotland united against him, and fearing to fall under their united efforts, thought proper to make a truce with the Papists of Ireland, in order to bring ever the English troops who served in that kingdom. By this means he not only had many of the English troops that served there, but also several of the native Irish who came to increase his army. It was then the parliament complained with truth of his employ­ing Papists in his service, and still farther extended their reproach by saying that he encouraged them to re­bel. These troops, however, only served to procure the hatred of his subjects, without strengthening his army. They were totally routed by Fairfax, one of the generals of the parliament army, and slaughtered without mercy after a submission. It was said, that several Irish women were found among the slain, who with long knives did considerable execution; but the animosity of the English against those wretches, at that time, might have given rise to the calumny.

One misfortune now seemed to follow close upon another: Prince Rupert, who had long sustained the honour of the royal arms, was defeated at York, and his army dispersed by Fairfax. Charles had retired to Oxford; his present danger excited his friends to [Page 30] new efforts; he levied new forces, and had some slight success. But this appearance of good fortune did not continue. His army was turbulent and se­ditious; that of the parliament every day improved in discipline, and obeyed from principle. Among instances of this nature was that act called the self-denying ordinance, by which it was resolved, that no member of the house of commons should have a command in the army. The reasons assigned for this were specious, and perhaps sincere. It was done to prevent the parliament's wishing for a continu­ance of the war, in order to enjoy a continuing share of authority. The former generals were there­fore changed; the Earl of Essex, Denbigh, and Man­chester gave up their commissions, and Fairfax, with the assistance of Cromwell, new-modelled the army without any opposition.

It was the general opinion, that this new altera­tion would enfeeble the parliament army, but the event proved otherwise; they were, after this, every-where victorious. Both armies met near Naseby. The King, who commanded the main body of his own troops, shewed himself upon this occasion a coura­geous general, encouraging his soldiers where giving way, and rallying them in person when broken. The enemy, however, was victorious; wherever Cromwell fought, he brought conquest and terror; and the defeat of the royal army was principally owing to him. This fatal blow the King could never after recover. All his infantry were so scattered that the enemy took as many prisoners as they pleas­ed; his baggage, and cabinet in which his most secret papers were contained, fell into the hands of his pur­suers; and yet, after all, there were not above six hundred men slain upon the field of battle.

It was now that Cromwell's courage and genius began to appear; he had hitherto been only a tur­bulent speaker in the house of commons, and the [Page 31] leader of a regiment in the army. But he now dis­covered talents greater than his employments, and his present success opened to him the prospects of am­bition, which he never after lost sight of. Historians seldom distinguish properly in the changes to be found in the same character; it is probable Cromwell be­gan to act in the state with principles of conviction and sincerity; but, new occurrences arising, his soul was not proof to the allurements of fortune; he gave way to her seducing call. Had he been on the op­pressed side, he might have displayed surprising in­stances of constancy and integrity; but, happening to be victorious, he became a tyrant and usurper, and bathed his country with royal blood.

Cromwell was possessed of apparent humility and internal pride. This is just the character which Machiavel describes for a successful usurper. He was originally the son of a private gentleman of a moderate fortune, who had some years before at­tempted leaving the kingdom upon a principle of re­ligion, but was prevented by the King. This reli­gious deportment Cromwell ever inviolably preserv­ed; it secured him an ascendancy in the house of commons, where the majority were enthusiasts; it gained him the affections of Fairfax the general, who was courageous, ignorant, and sincere. It acquired him the love of the army, where his presence was coveted; and he alone was permitted to unite the military and civil employments in his person, for he had a seat in the house while he was a colonel in the field. But he was still resolved farther to strengthen his interests by attaching the Independants privately to his side; they increased in numbers and power by his means, and he, in return, found them resolute and persevering friends.

The battle of Naseby seemed fatal to the interests of the King; and Fairfax and Cromwell availed themselves of the circumstances that offered. Every city that they [Page 32] appeared before capitulated. The young Prince of Wales, afterwards Charles II, participated in the misfortunes of his father, and fled to the island of Scilly. The King drew the shattered remains of his army into Oxford, and once more demanded peace. But, if he could not obtain it in the pros­perous state of his affairs, it was not likely that he could now succeed in his desires after a defeat. The house of commons insulted his misfortunes. His let­ters to the Queen were published, with those ill­natured remarks and railleries which none but the vicious are capable of making. To be at once mer­ry and malicious is the sign of a corrupt heart and mean understanding.

The King, after having taken every measure that he thought could procure peace, without effect, now saw himself shut up in Oxford, a place almost with­out any fortifications, and every day in danger of falling into the power of a fierce and exasperated party. In such a situation he therefore was obliged to chuse the least of two evils, and to deliver him­self up to the Scotch army, rather than the English, as he expected to find less animosity in the former. The Scotch officers had made him some general pro­mises, grounded, probably, upon their hopes of his compliance with every request they should make. He sent them word of his intention to come to their army; and they promised to receive him, and pro­vide for his safety. Upon this precarious assurance the King left Oxford, and, travelling through by­ways and obscure places, arrived at the Scotch army in nine days. From that moment he ceased to be free. The Scotch began to negotiate with the Eng­lish army, carried their royal prisoner about from one place to another, and, at length, upon consider­ation of being paid the arrears due for their service in England, which amounted to two hundred thousand pounds, they delivered up their King, and returned [Page 33] home laden with the reproaches of all good men, and the internal conviction of their own baseness. From this period till the usurpation of Cromwell, the constitution was convulsed with all the distrac­tions of guilt and party. When the kingly power was abolished, the parliament then took up the au­thority; but they were soon to lay it down in turn, and submit to a military democracy; a new form of government, which, like all other democracies, was turbulent, feeble, and bloody.

I am, &c.

LETTER V.

THE civil war was now over; the army of Scotland, being paid the reward of perfidy, returned to its own country. The parliament had now no enemy to fear, except those very troops which had fought their battles with success. You have been already informed, that this army, by a political stroke of Cromwell, was rendered indepen­dent of the parliament, and all its generals disabled from sitting there. The commons therefore were now willing to get rid of it as soon as possible, well knowing that, if the army continued, instead of re­ceiving laws, it would presume to dictate. They therefore passed a vote, by which it was ordained, that a part of it should be disbanded, and another part of it sent over into Ireland. It may easily be imagined that Cromwell would not suffer this. Now was the crisis of his greatness, and he seized the op­portunity; he formed a council of officers, and an­other of common soldiers, called Agitators, who were appointed to enquire into the grievances of the army, and lay them before the parliament. The very [Page 34] same conduct which had formerly passed between the parliament and King was now put in practice be­tween the army and parliament. As the commons granted every request the army rose in their demands; these accused the army of mutiny and sedition, and those retorted the accusation, by alledging a mani­fest design in the parliament to rule alone.

The King had been confined since he came into the power of the English, at Holmby castle; the ar­my were resolved to be possessed of his person, and sent one Joyce, a cornet, who from a taylor was be­come an officer, to take the King by force, and bring him a prisoner to Newmarket. This commis­sion he executed with intrepidity and dispatch. It was in vain that the commons, now without power, complained of this insolence; the army, instead of being awed by their menaces, marched towards Lon­don; and now, in turn, prescribed laws to their employers. Cromwell, willing to give all his in­justice the appearance of rectitude, caused eleven members of the house of commons to be accused. These were the most powerful and leading speakers, which so astonished the members, that, willing to appease the army at any rate, they writ to the ge­neral, that they were ready to receive any particular charge against such as fell under his displeasure.

This was an overture for peace, but pre-eminence was what the army aimed at; instead therefore of being pleased at this condescension, the general turn­ed their accusation into a general complaint, and tried every method to provoke a quarrel, which the others endeavoured to evade. The citizens of Lon­don, at length, opened their eyes; they now saw the constitution effectually destroyed; they saw an oppressive parliament now subjected to a more oppres­sive army; they perceived their religion abolished, their King a captive, and their people exposed to the worst of slavery.

[Page 35] In this exigence the common-council assembled the militia of the city, the works were manned, and a manifesto published, aggravating the hostile inten­tions of the army. The house of commons was not less divided than the state: one part was for encou­raging the citizens to proceed, while the rest, with the two speakers at their head, was for the army. The slightest divisions, in such a situation, are soon attended with violent consequences. The commons separated, the speakers, with sixty-two members, quitted the house to seek protection from the army, while those who remained behind gave orders, and established laws, as if they had power to enforce obedience.

Their assumed power, however, continued but a short time, for the army, with the speakers at their head, soon approached the city. Fear, therefore, compelled the common-council to concur in mea­sures which they tacitly disapproved. They opened their gates to the general, who, attended by the two speakers and the rest of the members, repaired to their respective habitations. The parliament, thus over-awed, gave up the command of the Tower to general Fairfax, and ordered him the thanks of both houses for having disobeyed their commands.

It still remained to dispose of the King, who had been sent prisoner to Hampton-court. The In­dependants, at the head of whom was Cromwell, and the Presbyterians, in the name of either house, treated separately with him in private; he even had hopes that in these struggles for power he might be chosen mediator in the dispute, and expected that the state, at last, sensible of the miseries of anarchy, like a froward child, hushed by its own importuni­ties, would settle under its former tranquil consti­tution. But he was soon undeceived, when he found the army and the generals maste [...] in the dispute; and when, as he had hitherto been used with some [Page 36] degree of respect, upon their prevailing, he saw him­self treated with very little deference or consideration. He therefore resolved to seek safety by flight, and, at­tended by two of his courtiers, fled from his con­finement, and travelled on horseback all night to the sea-side, in order to embark for France, leaving behind him a letter to both houses of parliament. His usual fortunes, however, still attended him here; no ship was in readiness at the place appointed, and he had no other method left, but to trust to the ge­nerosity of the Governor of the Isle of Wight for protection. Colonel Hammond was then in that command; a creature of Cromwell, who had been placed there by the interest of John Hampden, whom we have seen such an opposer of the King. His Ma­jesty's attendants, whose names were Ashburnham and Berkeley, went to talk with the Governor upon this important occasion, who, instead of promising the protection required, only returned an evasive answer, and desired to be conducted to the King. Upon this all three went together to the house, where the unfortunate Monarch expected their ar­rival; but Hammond staid below. When Ashburn­ham informed his Majesty that Hammond was come to wait upon him, but that he had given no promise for protection, the King, who had now found almost all the world unfaithful, could not help crying out, O Jack, thou ha [...] undone me. Ashburnham burst into a shower of tears, and offered to kill Hammond that moment with his own hand. The humane Monarch would not permit this. Hammond was brought up, and the King being compelled to follow him to Carisbrook castle was once more made a prisoner, and treated by Hammond with only the outward ap­pearances of respect.

In the mean time the parliament continued every day to grow more feeble, and more factious; the army more powerful, and better united among each [Page 37] other. Cromwell had taken every precaution to establish such a subordination among his troops, as was necessary to conduct them with ease, and invi­gorate his proceedings. But his views were in some danger of being controverted, at this juncture, by a new and unheard-of confederacy. The Indepen­dants were for having no subordination in govern­ment. A set of men called Levellers now arose, who declared against any other governor than Christ. They declared that all degrees should be levelled, and an equality universally established in titles and estates. They presented several petitions, and car­ried their insolence to an immeasurable pitch. Cromwell at once saw that he was now upon the point of losing all the fruits of his former schemes and dangers, and dreaded this new faction still the more, as they turned his own pretended principles against himself: thus finding all at stake, he was re­solved, by one resolute blow, to disperse the faction, or perish in the attempt. Having intimation that the Levellers were to meet at a certain place, he unexpectedly appeared before the terrified assembly, at the head of his red regiment, which had been hitherto invincible. He demanded, in the name of God, what their assembly and murmurings would be at; and, receiving an insolent answer, he laid two of the most remarkable dead upon the ground with his own hands. The guards dispersing the rest, he caused several of them to be hanged upon the spot, sent others prisoners to London, and thus dispersed a faction, no otherwise criminal than in having fol­lowed his own example.

This action served still more to increase his power in the camp, in the parliament, and in the city. Fairfax, now become a Lord, was nominally general, but Cromwell was invested with all the power of the army. The King, a prisoner in the Isle of Wight, still continued to negotiate a peace; while the parlia­ment [Page 38] saw no other method of destroying the mili­tary power which themselves had raised, but by opposing to it that of the King. Frequent proposi­tions therefore passed between the captive Monarch and the commons; but the great obstacle, their in­sisting upon destroying Episcopacy, still defeated every measure.

In the mean time the Scotch, ashamed of having been thought to have sold their King, raised an army in his favour. Many of the young nobility in Eng­land seconded their intentions; the King's desperate affairs once more began to wear a favourable aspect, which Cromwell perceiving, led his veteran army to cer­tain victory. Success still seemed to back his crimes; he defeated their forces entirely at Preston, and took the Duke of Hamilton, their general, prisoner. Fair-fax, on the other hand, was equally successful in Kent and Essex; the insurgents having retired into the city of Colchester, which declared for the King, he blocked them up, and, having compelled them to surrender at discretion, he treated them with that in­humanity for which the republican army was at that time remarkable.

The parli ment still continued to treat with the King, and, apprehending more from the designs of their generals than the attempts of their Monarch, seemed in earnest, for the first time, in their negotia­tions; but it was now too late; the army soon re­turned crowned with their accustomed success, and with furious remonstrances demanded justice upon the King. They accused him as the cause of all the misfortunes of the kingdom, and insisted that his par­tizans and favourites should share with him in his public punishment. This remonstrance was soon af­ter backed by petitions from the garrisons dispersed over different parts of the kingdom, and the counties of Somerset and Norfolk concurred in the same de­mand. Fairfax, being influenced by Cromwell, and [Page 39] not perceiving that he was the tool of his crafty collegue, transferred his royal prisoner from the Isle of Wight to Hurst castle. The parliament complained of this arbitrary proceeding, but their remonstrances were now but empty sound. They began to issue ordinances for a more effectual oppo­sition; but they received a message from Cromwell, that he intended paying them a visit next day with his army, and in the mean time ordered them to raise him upon the city of London forty thousand pounds. Affrighted at the approaching danger, they complied with his demand; and, in the mean time, the ge­neral with his army came and took up his quarters in the skirts of the city. The commons still pro­ceeded in the treaty with the King, but this Crom­well was resolved to oppose: they voted, that the carrying the King prisoner to Hurst castle was with­out the advice or consent of the house. To punish them for this, Cromwell placed guards round their house, and made those members prisoners whom he judged most opposite to his designs. One of his colonels, whose name was Pride, having a paper of names in his hand, seized upon one-and-forty, and sent them to the Court of Wards, where they were kept under guard. These were Presbyterians, the original authors of all the troubles, and who now fell victims to the side they had espoused. The next day an hundred more of the members were denied entrance; and that part of the house which now remained was entirely composed of a small body of Independants, ludicrously called the Rump. These soon voted, that the transactions of the house, a few days before, were illegal; and that the general's conduct was just and necessary.

This parliament, if it now deserves the name, was nothing but a medley of the most obscure citizens, the slaves of the army, the officers of which, being themselves members, ruled all their proceedings. It [Page 40] was now therefore unanimously resolved in this seditious assembly to erect an High Court of Jus­tice, with power to try the King for treason against the kingdom. For form-sake they desired the concurrence of the few remaining Lords in the other house; but even here there still was virtue enough left unanimously to reject so horrid a propo­sal. This no way abated the ardour of the com­mons; they voted that the concurrence of the house of Lords was unnecessary; they declared that all power was originally derived from the people; a declara­tion true in itself, but which they wrested to the most detestable purposes. Colonel Harrison, the son of a butcher, was commanded to conduct the King from Hurst castle to Windsor. When he arrived there, the council of war ordained, that he should be no lon­ger treated with the deference due to royalty. All ceremony was laid aside, and he now saw himself de­prived of his servants, and exposed to the contempt of low-bred insolence. From the sixth to the twen­tieth of January, the time was employed in making preparations for this astonishing scene of guilt. One hundred and forty-five persons were appointed Judges upon this occasion; and one Bradshaw, a practitioner of the law, was elected as President of this detestable synod.

The King was now conducted from Windsor to St. James's, and was next day produced before the High Court at Westminster-hall to take his tryal. He still remembered the dignity he owed to himself before such an inferior court; and, taking his place with his hat on, with a stern air, surveyed his Judges, who were also covered. When his charge was read, importing that he had been the cause of all the blood that was shed since the commencement of the rebellion, he could not repress a smile at once of contempt and indignation. He then de­manded by what authority he was brought to such a tryal? To which Bradshaw replied, that he was [Page 41] tried in the name of the commons of England. The King then objected to the legality of the tribunal, since the sanction of the Lords and his own were wanting to complete it; and refused to plead to the articles of the impeachment Being desired to an­swer several times; and persisting in his refusal, he was remanded to his confinement, and the court adjourned. At their second sitting the president again summoned the King to answer to his charge; and the King again demurred to the legality of his Judges, and began to open his objections, when he was interrupted by Bradshaw, and sent back to pri­son, as before. At his third appearance he continued firm to his purpose, and refused to reply, until he should be convinced that their proceedings were not contrary to the fundamental laws of the kingdom. The fourth and last time he appeared before this self-created court of justice, as he was going thither, he was insulted by the soldiers, and the mob, who exclaimed, Justice, justice, execution, execution. He ap­peared before the court with the same firm compo­sure as usual, with his hat on; and while his fen­tence was reading, in which he was branded with all the odious appellations that malice could sug­gest, he discovered no other emotions than those of pity. In walking back from this horrid tribunal, the rabble renewed the cry of Justice, execution; and among other insults one miscreant presumed to spit in the face of his King. He patiently wiped his face: Poor souls, said he, they would treat their generals in the same manner for sixpence. A soldier more com­passionate than the rest could not help imploring a blessing upon his royal head; an officer overhearing it struck the pious centinel to the ground in presence of the Monarch, who could not help saying, that the punishment exceeded the offence. The day of execu­tion was fixed to be the third after his sentence; which when it arrived, he was conducted on foot [Page 42] through St. James's Park to Whitehall, accompanied by Doctor Juxon, and guarded by a regiment of foot, under the command of Colonel Tomlinson. The scaffold was covered with black, in the middle of which were seen the block and ax, with two exe­cutioners in masques. The soldiers were placed round it, and an infinite concourse of spectators waited with silent horror at a greater distance. The King surveyed all their solemn preparations with calm composure; he assured the persons who stood with him upon the scaffold, that he thought himself guiltless of any crime but that of having given up the Earl of Strafford to the fury of his enemies; and that he had confidence in the mercy of Heaven. While he thus avowed his innocence, the Bishop who attended him warned him that he had but one stage more to heaven; at which the King cried out, I go from a corruptible to an incorruptible crown, where no disturbance can arrive. ‘"You are exchanged, replied the Bishop, from a temporal to an eternal crown; a good exchange!"’ Having now taken off his cloak, he delivered his George to the Prelate, em­phatically pronouncing the word, Remember. He then laid his head on the block, and stretched forth his hands as a signal. One of the men in a masque severed his head from his body at a blow; and the other, holding it up streaming with gore, cried out, This is the head of a traitor. Such was the death of Charles, who lived long enough to see the laws and constitution of his country expire before him. He had the misfortune to be bred up in high notions of the prerogative which he thought his duty to sustain. He lived at a time when the spirit of the law was in opposition to the genius of the people; and govern­ing by old rules, instead of endeavouring to accom­modate himself to the changes of the times, he fell in the universal convulsion. Many Kings before him expired by treasons, plots, or assassination; but never [Page 43] since the times of Agis the Lacedemonian were any but him sacrificed by their subjects with all the for­malities of justice. Upon the whole, it must be con­fessed, that, though the nation was branded by fo­reigners with reproach upon this occasion, yet these struggles at length ended in domestic happiness and security; the laws became more precise, and the sub­ject more ready to obey, as if a previous fermentation in the constitution was necessary to its subsequent re­finement.

I am, &c.

LETTER VI.

CROMWELL, who had secretly solicited the King's death, now began to feel wishes to which he had been hitherto a stranger; he perceived himself not far removed from the object of his most unbounded ambition. His views expanded with suc­cess, and his first principles of liberty shrunk when opposed to the unbounded prospect of power. The parliament, which was still permitted to enjoy the shadow of authority, voted it high treason to ac­knowledge Charles Stewart, son of the murdered King, as successor to the throne. They likewise voted the house of Lords useless and dangerous, and passed an act for the abolition of all kingly power. A great seal was made, on one side of which were engraved the arms of England and Ireland, with this inscription, The great seal of England; on the reverse was represented the house of commons sitting, with this motto, The first year of freedom, by God's blessing, restored, 1648.’

They next proceeded to try those gallant men whose attachment to their late Sovereign had been most remarkable. The Duke of Hamilton and Lord [Page 44] Capel were accused, condemned, and beheaded; se­veral others shared the same fate. The Earl of Norwich and Sir John Owen were condemned, but reprieved. The Scotch were not a little displeased at the death of the Duke, who was executed not only contrary to the laws of war, but the law of nations; they were therefore determined to acknow­ledge the young Prince for their King. But their love of liberty, in some measure, seemed to combat their resentment; they called him to the throne in­deed, but, at the same time, abridged his power with every limitation which they had formerly at­tempted to impose on their late Sovereign. The se­cond Charles had neither the virtue, the constancy, nor the principles of his father. Attached to no re­ligion, he agreed to all their proposals, and was con­tented to accept the formalities without the power of a King. He was received at Edinburgh with de­monstrations of profound respect, and entered the city by that very gate on which the limbs of the brave Montrose, one of his most faithful adherents, were still exposed; but he soon found that the life he was likely to lead would be an insupportable bon­dage to one of his volatile disposition. He was sur­rounded and incessantly importuned by the Scotch fanatical clergy, who came to instruct him in reli­gion, and obliged him to listen to long sermons, in which they seldom failed to stigmatize the late King as a tyrant, to accuse his mother of idolatry, and himself of an untoward disposition. Upon appoint­ed days he was obliged to hear six sermons without intermission. They insisted upon his observing Sun­day with a Jewish strictness. They even watched his looks; and, if he happened to smile at any part of their absurd enthusiasms, he was reprimanded for his profaneness. Charles for a while bore this inso­lence with hypocritical tranquility, and even pre­tended to be highly edified by their instructions; but, [Page 45] notwithstanding this, he only wished for an opportu­nity of escaping from such a variety of disgusting impertinence.

In the mean time the English parliament, alarmed at the King's restitution in Scotland, sent to recall Cromwell from Ireland, where he had carried on the war with his usual success. He had reduced Kil­kenny and many other places, and prosecuted his conquests with surprising rapidity. However, he now left the war in that kingdom to be carried on by Ire­ton, his deputy-lieutenant; and returned to England, in obedience to the mandate of the parliament. When he took his seat in the house, the speaker thanked him for the services he had done the com­monwealth. They then proceeded to deliberate up­on the war with Scotland. They desired to know if Fairfax would conduct the enterprize. Fairfax, a rigid Presbyterian, who had all along fought from principle, declined opposing a nation which he con­sidered as co-operating in the same good work for which he had first drawn the sword; he therefore declined the command, sent his commission to the commons, and retired to spend the remainder of his life in privacy and peace.

This was an inlet to Cromwell's subsequent power; he was appointed general of the forces of the com­monwealth, and soon marched into Scotland at the head of an army of eighteen thousand men, long accustomed to conquer. He found general Lesly at the head of an army far more numerous than his own, but undisciplined and mutinous. After some previ­ous skirmishing, Cromwell saw himself in a very dis­advantageous post near Dunbar, and his antagonist ready to take advantage of his incommodious situa­tion. However, perceiving the Scots preparing to give him battle, he assured his soldiers that the Lord had delivered the enemy into his hands, and ordered his army to sing psalms, as already assured of victory. [Page 46] The ministers of the Scotch army were not less san­guine in their assurances of victory than he; they boldly promised success in the name of the Lord, and excited a spirit of impatience among the soldi­ers. Victory, as always before, again declared for Cromwell, who routed the enemy with great slaughter, while he did not lose on his side above forty men in all.

Charles, who hated the Scotch army, and only dreaded Cromwell, was well enough pleased at this defeat. It served to introduce him to a greater share in the command than he was before permitted to en­joy. He therefore put himself at the head of that remnant which survived the defeat, and strengthened it by the royalists, who had been before excluded from his service. And now, instead of following Cromwell, who led his victorious troops to Perth, he resolved to seize this opportunity of penetrating into England, where he expected to be joined by numbers there still attached to his interests. His hopes in this were frustrated; his army, on their march, was lessened by continual desertion and dis­ease. Few voluntiers repaired to the royal standard; and he at length saw his vigilant enemy overtaking him at Worcester. Both armies fought with equal intrepidity, but Cromwell was again victorious. Ne­ver was so complete a victory obtained by him be­fore. Two thousand perished by the sword, and four times that number, being taken, were sold as slaves to the American planters. The conqueror be­came master of all Scotland, and set a price of a thousand pounds upon the head of the King.

Imagination can scarce conceive dangers mor [...] romantic, or distresses more severe, than those whic [...] attended the young King's escape from Worcester [...] After his hair was cut off, the better to effect hi [...] escape, he worked for some days, disguised as a peasant, at wood-cutting. He next made an attemp [...] [Page 47] to retire into Wales, under the conduct of one Pen­drell, a poor but faithful companion in his distress. But in this attempt he was disappointed, every pass being guarded to prevent his escape. Being obliged to return, he met one Colonel Careless, who, like himself, had escaped the carnage at Worcester; and it was in his company that he was obliged to climb a spreading oak, among the thick branches of which they passed the day together, while the soldiers of the enemy went underneath in pursuit of him. From thence he passed with imminent danger, feeling all the vicissitudes of famine, fatigue, and pain, to the house of one Mr. Lane, a worthy subject of his, in Staffordshire. Here he deliberated about the means of escaping to France. They agreed that he should ride before this gentleman's daughter, on a visit to one Mrs. Horton, who lived in the neigh­bourhood of Bristol. During this journey he every day met people whose persons he knew, and once passed through a whole regiment of the parliament army.

When they arrived at the house of Mr. Norton, the first person they saw was one of his own chap­lains, sitting at the door, amusing himself with see­ing people play at bowls. The King, after having taken proper care of his horse in the stable, was shewn to an apartment which Mrs. Lane had pro­vided for him, upon pretence of indisposition. The butler, being sent to him with some refreshment, no sooner beheld his countenance, which was now very pale with anxiety and fatigue, than he recollected the visage of his King and Master, and falling upon his knees, while the tears streamed down his cheeks, he cried out, ‘"I am rejoiced to see your Majesty."’ The King enjoined him secrecy, and the honest servant punctually kept his word. Having staid some days in this place, he repaired to the house of Colonel Wyndham, where he was cordially receiv­ed, [Page 48] that gentleman's family having ever been noted for loyalty. Pursuing his route to the sea-side, he once more had a very providential escape from the little inn at which he lodged. It happened to be a solemn fast, and a fanatical weaver, who had fought in the parliament army, was preaching against the King, in a chapel fronting the house. Charles was actually one of the audience, A farrier of the same principles, who had been examining the horses be­longing to the passengers, came to assure the preacher, that he knew by the fashion of the shoes that one of the stranger's horses came from the North. The preacher instantly affirmed, that this horse could be­long to no other than Charles Stewart, and went immediately with a constable to the house; but the King, in the mean time, found means to escape. Thus, at length, after inexpressible hardships, and having experienced the fidelity of forty different per­sons of all ranks, who had power to betray him, he embarked at Brighthelmsted, and landed safely in Normandy.

Cromwell, in the mean time, returned to London in triumph, where he was met by the speaker of the house, accompanied by the mayor and magistrates in their formalities. His first care, upon his return, was to take the advantage of his successes, by depress­ing the Scotch. An act was passed for abolishing royalty in Scotland, and annexing it as a conquered province to the English commonwealth, impowering it, however, to send a certain number of representa­tives to the British parliament. It was now seen with astonishment, that a parliament composed of obscure and weak members could govern at once with unanimity and success. Without any acknowledged subordination they levied armies, maintained fleets, and gave laws to their neighbours. Never was Eng­land more powerful than at this period. The finances were managed with oeconomy and exactness. No [Page 49] private person became rich by public extortions. The revenues of the crown, the lands of the Bishops, and a tax of an hundred and twenty thousand pounds each month, supplied the wants of the government, and invigorated all their proceedings.

Having reduced the British dominions to perfect obedience, the parliament next resolved to chastise the Dutch, who had given but very slight causes of complaint. Dorislaus, one of the late King's Judges, being sent thither by the commons as envoy, was assassinated by the royal party that had taken refuge there; St. John, appointed English ambassador. was also insulted by the friends of the Prince of Orange. These were grounds sufficient to incense the republic of England to a war. Its success, how­ever, was doubtful; Blake commanded the English, and Van Tromp was Admiral of Holland; both equally experienced, courageous, and active. Seve­ral engagements served only to shew the excellence of the Admirals, without determining the balance of naval power. The parliament, however, was will­ing to continue the war, rightly judging that, when the force of the nation was exerted by sea, it would diminish Cromwell the general's power upon land.

Cromwell was not behind them in penetration; he saw they dreaded his growing power, and wished to diminish it; all his measures were conducted with a bold intrepidity that marked his character; and he was now resolved to make another daring effort. He persuaded his officers to present a petition for pay­ment of arrears and redress of grievances, which he knew would be rejected with disdain. The house, upon receiving it, appointed a committee to prepare an act, that all persons who presented such petitions for the future should be deemed guilty of high trea­son. This was what Cromwell wished for. He was sitting in council with his officers, when inform­ed of the subject on which the house was deliberating. [Page 50] Turning to major-general Vernon, I am compelled, cried he, to do a thing that makes the very hair of my head stand on end; and, starting up with marks of violent indignation in his countenance, he hastened to the parliament, with a body of three hundred soldiers. Upon entering the house, he took his place, and sat some time to hear the debates; and, when the speaker was about to put the question, he suddenly rose up, and, reviling them for their ambition and cruelty, he stamped with his foot, and instantly the house was filled with armed men. Then addressing himself to the members, Get you gone, said he; give place to honest men; you are no longer a parliament; I tell you, you are no longer a parliament; the Lord has done with you. He then accused one as a drunkard, another as a whoremaster, a third of adultery, and a fourth of extortion. It is you, added he, that have forced me upon this; I have sought the Lord night and day, that he would rather slay me than put me upon this work. Then pointing to the mace, Take away, cried he, that bauble; and, turning out all the members, he ordered the door to be locked, and, putting the key in his pocket, retired to Whitehall. Thus by one daring exploit the new republic was abolished, and the whole power, civil and military, centered in him alone. The present unsteady form of the English government, is the strongest proof of a late philo­sopher's opinion, that every country is possessed of a set of laws and constitutions best adapted to the nature of the inhabitants, the climate, and the soil, which when once broken through, the government must continue weak and unsteady, until the natural constitution is restored; as in mechanics all bodies continue to waver till their center of gravity is sup­ported.

I am, &c.

LETTER VII.

THAT parliament, which had long gloried in resisting violence, was now dissolved by an act of the most flagrant oppression. The people, how­ever, expressed no dislike at their dissolution. Crom­well received congratulatory addresses from the fleet, the corporations, and the army; but he was unwil­ling to put forth all his power at once; he resolved to amuse them with the form of a commonwealth, and familiarize them by degrees to arbitrary govern­ment. He decreed, that the sovereign power should be vested in one hundred and forty-four persons, un­der the denomination of a parliament; and he un­dertook himself to make the choice. The persons he pitched upon were the lowest, meanest, and most ignorant among the citizens; he foresaw, that, dur­ing the administration of such, he alone must govern; or that they would soon throw up the reins of go­vernment, which they were unqualified to guide. To excel in fanaticism seemed a necessary qualifi­cation in this new parliament. Several, with long names borrowed from scripture, were members; but a man, whose name was Praise God Barebones, was one of the most remarkable; and by his name the assembly was afterwards called in ridicule.

To this assembly was committed the care of mak­ing peace with the Dutch; but, being utterly unskil­led in such negotiations, the ambassadors of the States were quite at a loss how to treat with them. The people exclaimed at so foolish a legislature, and they themselves seemed not insensible of the contempt and ridicule which they every day failed not to incur. They had now sat five months without doing any thing of importance; when at length Rouse, their speaker, rose up, and proposed that, as they were unable to bear the burthen that was laid upon them, [Page 52] they should resign their authority [...]im from whom they had received it. Cromwell accepted their re­signation with pleasure, and sent Colonel White to clear the house of the few fanatics who persisted in continuing to sit. White, entering with a detach­ment of soldiers, asked, What they did there! To which replying, that they were seeking the Lord: Then you may go elsewhere, cried he, for to my certain knowledge the Lord has not been here these many years.

The officers now, by their own authority, de­clared Cromwell Protector. He was possessed of that which is the original of all command, namely, force; for the strong ever give laws to the feeble. The mayor and aldermen were sent for; the usurper was installed at Whitehall, in the palace of the Eng­lish Kings; he assumed the office of Protector; was honoured with the epithet of Highness, and proclaim­ed in London, and other parts of the kingdom. Thus an obscure inhabitant of Wales, at length, rose to unlimited power, far beyond that of former Kings, by his courage and his hypocrisy.

He was about fifty-three years of age when he be­gan to reign, which he did with equal conduct, mo­deration, and success. He, in the beginning, chose among the officers, the former companions of his dangers and victories, twenty-one counsellors of state, to each of whom he assigned a pension of one thousand pounds a year. The troops were always paid a month in advance; the magazines were well provided; the public treasure, of which he had the disposal, was managed with frugality and care. The Dutch were compelled to sue for peace, and he dic­tated the terms. He insisted upon their paying de­ference to the British flag. They were compelled to abandon the interest of the King; they engaged to pay eighty-five thousand pounds, as an indemni­fication for former expences; and to restore the English East-India company a part of those domi­nions [Page 53] of which they had unjustly deprived them in the East.

Every nation with whom the English had any connection, now courted their Protector's alliance. Among the number France solicited his aid against Spain: Cromwell, though capable of conducting the internal parts of government, had no skill in foreign policy. He lent his assistance to humble Spain, at a time when the interests of Europe required her ex­altation. Cardinal Mazarine gave him up Dunkirk. His fleet, under the conduct of the famous Blake, took the island of Jamaica. The kingdom of Ire­land was entirely reduced to obedience, and treated by him as a conquered country; many thousands of the wretched natives strove to find, in banishment, an alleviation of their miseries; numbers died of fa­mine, and by the hands of the executioner not a few.

Cromwell, to give the greater appearance of justice to his usurpation, was resolved to govern by parlia­ment, yet by such a parliament alone as he could govern. He assembled them, and dissolved them at pleasure; the house of Lords was entirely disconti­nued; but he set up a new chamber of parliament, composed of his own creatures, to oppose that elected by the voices of the people. Thus, ever active, vi­gilant, and resolute, he discovered every conspiracy against his person, and every insurrection among the people, before they took effect. He had the address to prevail upon his parliament to make him an offer of the crown, merely to have the seeming magnani­mity of refusing it, and thus to confirm his real power.

His private life was no less worthy our observa­tion; he led an obscure life in the palace assigned for his habitation, without pomp, without luxury. When he sent his son Henry into Ireland, he al­lowed him but one servant in his retinue. His man­ners [Page 54] were naturally austere, and he preserved the dignity and distance of his character in the midst of the coarsest familiarity. He was cruel from policy; just and temperate from inclination; laborious and exact in all his designs; without eloquence he had the talent of persuading; and without sincerity the art of making sincere adherents: his dexterity equal­ly satisfied every sect; with Presbyterians, a Presby­rian; with Deists a Deist; only an Independant in principle. It was by these arts he continued his authority, first cemented by blood, and maintained by hypocrisy and usurpation.

Yet, notwithstanding this conduct, which contri­buted to render him truly formidable at home, he was, after a few years reign, become truly miserable to himself. He knew that he was detested by every party in the kingdom; he knew the fierce spirit of the people whom he had made slaves; and he was incessantly haunted by the terrors of an assassination. To increase his calamity, a book was published, in­titled, Killing no murder; in which it was proved to be just to destroy him at any rate. Shall we, said this popular declaimer, who would not suffer the lion to invade us, tamely stand to be devoured by the wolf? Crom­well read this spirited treatise, and it is said was ne­ver seen to smile afterwards. He wore armour un­der his cloaths, and always kept a loaded pistol in his pocket; his aspect became cloudy, and he re­garded every stranger with a glance of timid suspi­cion. He always travelled with hurry and precipi­tation, and never slept two nights successively in the same apartment. A tertian ague came at last to deliver him from a life of horror and misery. He died at Whitehall, after having nominated his son Richard Cromwell as his successor. Notwithstand­ing the evident approaches of death, his fanatical chaplains affirmed that he would recover, and thanked God for the undoubted assurances they had [Page 55] received of his safety. He was even of the same opinion himself. I tell you, cried he to the physicians that attended him, I shall not die of this distemper; fa­vourable answers have been returned from Heaven, not only to my own supplications, but likewise to those of the godly, who carry on a more intimate correspondence with the Lord. This behaviour, at his death, is an undeniable proof that he was in reality more the enthusiast than an hy­pocrite; and, in fact, we are more frequently de­ceived ourselves, than we attempt to deceive others.

Whatever were the differences of interest after the death of the Usurper, the influence of his name was still sufficient to get Richard his son proclaimed Pro­tector. The parties, however, were now grown too headstrong to be controlled by greater abilities; what then could Richard do who had nothing active in his disposition, no talents for business, no know­ledge of government, no ambition, no importance? Oliver, by means of the army, had long governed the kingdom; they were now left to govern alone. They first therefore presented a petition to the new Protector, demanding that no member of the army should be subject to the civil power, and that the officers should enjoy the privilege of chusing their own general. Richard, shocked at their presump­tion, rejected their requests, and even threatened to dismiss them the service. The parliament attempted to support these measures of Richard, but the army prevailed; the parliament was dissolved by their me­naces, and the Protector again reduced to a private station. The officers, once more being thus left to themselves, determined to replace the remnant of the old parliament which had beheaded the King, and which the late Protector had so disgracefully dismiss­ed. This was called The good old cause; and such of the higher officers as seemed unwilling to give up their authority to this parliament, were intimidated by their subalterns into a compliance.

[Page 56] The Rump parliament, as it was called, being thus once again established, began by vigorously at­tempting to lessen the power of that very army which had just now given them all their authority. They new-modelled a part of the forces, cashiered such of­ficers as they feared, and placed others in their room. These attempts, however, did not pass without vigo­rous efforts in the principal officers who were at London to oppose them. They held several conferences together to strengthen their power, and lessen that of their opposers. They at length came to the usual resource of these turbulent times; they first presented a se­ditious petition; and, upon finding it rejected, con­ducted by general Lambert, they entered the house, excluded the members, dissolved the parliament by their own authority, and formed a council of ten to provide for the safety of the commonwealth. Dur­ing these transactions, general Monck was at the head of twelve thousand veterans in Scotland. Monck had begun his fortunes under the command of the late King, and was taken prisoner in his service. Upon the death of his Master he was released from his long confinement to command under Cromwell, for whom he always fought with conduct and suc­cess.

In this anarchy and confusion he seemed agitated by different designs, between loyalty to his lawful King, ambition to advance himself, and the appre­hensions he was under from the governing part of the nation; his loyalty at length prevailed; he re­solved to restore the royal family, but to use all the precautions that were requisite for their safety and his own. He soon had an opportunity of embarras­sing the affairs of the nation still more, to prepare the way for her meditated revolution. The officers, now formed into a council of ten, had sent to treat with him; he consented to a negotiation only in or­der to gain time; and after a treaty had been actu­ally [Page 57] signed by those he employed in this business, he refused to ratify it upon frivolous pretences. The deposed parliament, finding that Monck had disap­proved of the proceedings of the officers at London, were resolved to avail themselves of his friendship, in order to be reinstated in their former authority; and sent him a private commission, appointing him com­mander in chief of all the forces in England, Scot­land, and Ireland. He now therefore resolved to march towar [...]s London, and upon his approach the officers wh [...] had deposed the parliament found them­selves almost deserted, and at length compelled to re­sign the authority they had usurped. When he reached St. Alban's, he sent a letter to the house, desiring that London should be cleared of all other troops to make way for his approach. This demand awakened the suspicion of the parliament, but they were reluctantly obliged to comply. He entered London in triumph at the head of his army, and re­paired to the council of state, but refused taking the oath of abjuration, shrewdly observing that the fewer oaths were taken, the cleaner would the consciences be. He next examined his officers, and, having se­cured their concurrence, he restored those members to the parliament which long since had been secluded before the trial of the King.

The Independants, who had voted for the trial of Charles, were now greatly out-numbered; and it was soon seen that the royal party was likely to pre­vail. The republicans, who, though they hated a Pro­tector, still more feared the royal resentment, endea­voured to persuade Monck to assume the sovereign power, in imitation of Cromwell. He rejected their advice, and in the mean time gave the King private intimations of his designs, new-modelled the army, quelled an incipient insurrection, and prepared all things for his restoration.

[Page 58] Nothing now was wanting, but the authority and consent of a free parliament, to settle the fluctuating constitution. On the twenty-fifth of April 1660, the new parliament met in both houses, after the manner of their ancestors. They immediately voted that the government ought to be vested in a King, Lords, and Commons. On the eighth of May Charles II. was proclaimed in London; on the twenty-sixth he arrived at Dover; on the twenty-ninth he reached Whitehall through an innumerable multitude of people, who rent the air with their ac­clamations. The wretched kingdom, long torn with faction, and oppressed by its own struggles for free­dom, once more began to respire; fanaticism, with all its train of melancholy terrors and cruelties, was now dispelled; the arts of peace began to return; but, unhappily, the arts of luxury entered in their train.

I am, &c.

LETTER VIII.

IT will undoubtedly astonish posterity, when they find a whole nation making these sudden changes from absolute liberty to the most submissive obedi­ence; at one time almost unanimously declaring a­gainst monarchy, and soon after, with the most un­bounded flattery, soliciting the shackles of arbitrary power. The parliament, which had before so vehe­mently opposed the late Monarch, possessed of every virtue, were now profuse in their submissions to his successor, whose character stood in no manner of competition with that of his father.

They first ordained to have the bodies of Crom­well, Ireton, and Bradshaw, dug from their graves, [Page 59] and dragged to the place of execution; here they continued hanging the whole day, and then were interred under the gallows. Of those who sat in judgment on the late Monarch's trial, some were dead, and some were thought worthy to find par­don; ten only out of fourscore were devoted to im­mediate destruction. These were enthusiasts, who had all along acted from principle, and bore their fate with all the confidence of martyrs. They had been formerly cruel themselves, and they were now in turn treated with shocking inhumanity; the exe­cutioners, not content with performing the office of death, added insult to their tortures; the suffer­ers, to a man, thanked God for being permitted to die for his cause, and braved the fury of their oppres­sors with manly contempt.

Their deaths seemed to inspire a few desperate en­thusiasts with the most strange confidence that ever deluded a poor ignorant party. One Venner, who expected the immediate coming of Christ upon earth, appeared in the streets of London in arms, at the head of threescore enthusiasts like himself, and de­clared against any other Monarch but King Jesus. They had been wrought into such a pitch of phrenzy as to believe themselves invulnerable, and fought as men confident of victory. The few survivors of their defeat were taken, tried, condemned, and executed: they affirmed to the last, that, if they had been de­ceived, the Lord himself concurred in the imposture.

It was now feared that the tide of loyalty would bear down all the sormer mounds of freedom; the par­liament seemed to concur in all the designs of the court, and even to anticipate its wishes; but, though the King was established, his old faithful friends, and the followers of his family, were left unrewarded. There were numbers who had fought for his father, and for him, and had lost their all in his service, still pining in want and misery; while their persecutors, [Page 60] who, prefiting by the troubles of their country, had acquired fortunes during the civil war, were still per­mitted to enjoy them without molestation. The suf­ferers petitioned in vain; Charles was no way re­markable for gratitude; his pleasures, his flatterers, and concubines engrossed all his attention, and ex­hausted his finances; the unhappy Cavaliers murmur­ed without redress; he fled from their gloomy expo­stulations to scenes of mirth, riot, and festivity.

The kingdom now seemed to be converted into a theatre of debauchery, which had before been a scene of blood. The Independants were no longer to be seen; the Puritans were restrained; the hor­rors of the late war were the subject of ridicule; the formality and the ignorance of sectaries were dis­played upon the stage, and even laughed at in the pulpit. The King had no religion; and, though he permitted the persecution of sectaries, it was merely from political motives. The late miseries of the na­tion were not sufficient to deter a few desperate fana­ties from attempting to excite them afresh; they laid a scheme for surprising several towns in the North, and raising a general insurrection; the mini­stry discovered the plot, before it was ripe for execu­tion; thirty of the conspirators were taken and exe­cuted; and this plot was a pretext for continuing the parliament then sitting, and repealing the act for triennial parliaments, as being dangerous in times of commotion.

The English parliament seemed willing to make the King reparation for their former disobedience, and the Scotch were still more sanguine in the ex­pressions of their attachment. Had Charles been an active Monarch, he might have now become an ab­solute one. They confirmed the doctrine of passive obedience by a solemn act; they assigned him a re­venue of twelve hundred thousand pounds, exclusive of the expence necessary for sitting and supplying [Page 61] the fleet. None of his predecessors were ever possessed of such a large revenue; nevertheless, his prodigality rendered him indigent, and, instead of desiring an as­cendancy over his parliament, he was content to be an humble and continual dependant on their bounty.

His prodigality, his libertinism, and the familiarity with which he permitted himself to be treated by his subjects, soon began to alter their sentiments from a veneration for royalty to a contempt of his person and administration. He declared war against Hol­land, merely to have an opportunity of spending up­on his pleasures. a part of those sums granted him by parliament for the support of a fleet and army. This war was carried on with doubtful success; but the alarm which the nation received from Ruyter the Dutch Admiral's attempting to sail up the river Thames, still more disgusted them against their go­vernor. Immediate dangers, though small, influ­ence the mind with greater force than distant, though terrible calamities. They now called to mind the administration of Cromwell, when the people en­joyed security at home, and were respected abroad; they recollected that vigorous Usurper's labours for the good of the nation, and compared them with those of the present effeminate and unsuccessful reign.

Natural and accidental calamities seemed to unite themselves to those brought on by bad management. A plague ravaged the city, which swept away more than one hundred thousand of its inhabitants; and soon after the city was almost entirely destroyed by a conflagration, which raged for three days without intermission. The spirit of the people soon surmount­ed these calamities; London soon rose more beauti­ful from its ashes; the streets were built anew more spacious and convenient than before; and their di­stress soon became their advantage.

[Page 62] But neither war, nor accident, nor the murmurs of the people could abate the passion for gallantry, pleasure, and expence, that reigned through the court through the King's example. He had imbibed all that spirit of levity, during his residence in France, for which that kingdom is remarkable. Though he had been married soon after his restoration to the Infanta of Portugal, he kept several mistresses, by whom he had natural issue. Among this number were mada­moiselle Queroüaille, a French woman, whom he created Duchess of Portsmouth; Mrs. Palmer, whom he made a Countess; and Nel Gwyn and Mrs. Davis, actresses taken from the theatre.

But, though the court was thus lost to decency, the passion for uniformity in religion in the nation seemed to revive. The parliament was equally set against the Presbyterians and the Papists; an act was made called the Test act, importing that every person in office and employment should take the oaths of al­iegiance and supremacy, receive the sacrament in some parish church before competent witnesses, and subscribe a declaration, renouncing the doctrine of transubstantiation. This was levelled against the Duke of York, the King's brother, who had pro­fessed himself a Papist, and whom the parliament se­cretly aimed at excluding from the throne. The fears and discontents of the nation were vented with­out restraint; the apprehensions of a Popish succes­sor, an abandoned court, a parliament that had con­tinued, without a new election, for seventeen years; an alliance cemented with France, the secret enemy of England and the Protestant religion; and an un­successful and expensive war with Holland, their na­tural allies; all gave cause to kindle a spirit of indig­nation among the people. The court tried every method, but in vain, to satisfy these murmurs, or ap­pease them. Even the coffee-houses were suppressed where such topics were generally debated.

[Page 63] This universal ferment, as may easily be imagin­ed, broke out into an alarm. When the spirit of the English is once excited, they either find objects of resentment, or they make them. A rumour of a Popish conspiracy was first propagated, and one Titus Oates soon appeared to give it confirmation. Titus Oates had been from his youth an indigent and infa­mous adventurer. He was abandoned, illiterate, and shameless. He had been once indicted for perjury, afterwards chaplain of a man of war, and dismissed for unnatural practices. He then professed himself a Roman Catholic, went to the Jesuits College at St. Omer, but was dismissed, after some residence there, with infamy. He then returned to London, filled with projects of revenge; and the animosities of this unhappy nation soon appeared a proper place of nou­rishment to give this viper's virulence effect. He deposed upon oath, that the Jesuits, several of whom he named, and who were soon after taken up, had tried the King under the name of the Black Bastard, condemned him as an heretic, and resolved to de­prive him of life: that several attempts had been made without success, and that not only the King's brother, but even the Queen were privy to the de­sign. The house of commons immediately took fire at this pretended conspiracy; they petitioned for re­moving the Queen, rewarded Oates with a pension of twelve hundred pounds, and immediately ordered the conspirators to be tried in the courts of justice. Se­veral Jesuits were tried; their very profession was at that time sufficient to destroy them; before a partial Judge and an exasperated Jury, no mercy could be expected, and several, though apparently innocent, were executed as traytors upon this miscreant's in­formation. Coleman, the Duke of York's secretary, Ireland, Pickering, Grove, Fenwick, and White-bread were among the first that fell; they died de­claring [Page 64] their innocence to the last moment of their lives.

While the Protestants were labouring to humble both the Puritans and the Papists, those two parties were at the same time mutually employed in ruining each other. Plot was set against plot; that con­trived by Oates was called the Jesuits; that set to oppose it was called by the name of the Meal­tub Plot, as the scheme of the conspiracy was found hidden in a meal-tub. This was a design against Oates, for his perjuries had drawn upon him the furious resentment of the Catholic party; they were determined to take away his life by the same false evidence by which he had taken the lives of so many others.

Of all these plots tending to disturb the peace of the kingdom, it is said the Earl of Shaftesbury was at the bottom; he had been a member of the Long Parliament in the civil wars, and had gained great influence among the Presbyterians; he had insinu­ated himself into the confidence of Cromwell, and afterwards employed his credit in forwarding the re­storation. He had been made one of the privy­council in the present reign, but was ejected thence for the duplicity of his conduct. He was possessed of uncommon abilities, joined with turbulence, dis­simulation, and unbounded ambition. It was thought that this nobleman, in revenge for his disgrace at court, headed the demagogue faction, and alarmed the King with unceasing dangers.

He artfully increased the people's apprehensions of a Popish successor, and, by his interest, brought a bill into the house of commons for the exclusion of James Duke of York from the succession. In the national animosity raised against Papists it was no dif­ficult matter to have it passed through the house of commons; but, being presented to the house of peers, it was thrown out by a great majori [...]y.

[Page 65] The commons were greatly incensed at this re­pulse, but particularly their anger fell upon the Earl of Halifax, who exerted himself in the opposition. Halifax disregarded their anger, secure in conscious innocence. But their rage fell with more weight upon Lord Stafford, who had long been a prisoner in the Tower, upon the deposition of Oates. Not­withstanding his age, his weak intellects, and the justness of his defence, he was arraigned, condemn­ed, and executed for a plot which had its only foun­dation in perjury and subornation. All things threat­ened a renewal of the former troubles from which the kingdom had been but lately set free. The commons presented petition after petition to the King, desiring the punishment of Papists, and the abridgment of the royal prerogative. They seemed willing to intimidate the King, or to inflame the nation. At length Charles shewed a degree of for­titude that surprized even his friends; he rejected their petitions with contempt, and dissolved the par­liament that had abused their power.

The state of the nation at that time, with regard to religion, was thus: The principal men at court, if they professed any, were of the established church; so were all the men of great property, as well as the dregs of the people; but that body of men who voted at elections, placed between a state of opulence and penury, were in general Presbyterians. They were therefore willing to return representatives only of that persuasion.

Charles, however, was resolved to try one parlia­ment more, and appointed them to meet him at Ox­ford, the city of London having long been displeasing, by reason of their republican principles. The new parliament, however, seemed still more turbulent than the former; the members came armed, and attended by their friends and adherents, as if they expected to fight, and not deliberate. The representatives of [Page 66] London were in particular attended by a numerous body of horsemen, wearing cockades, inscribed, No Popery, no Slavery. To declaim against Popery was the voice of faction in the last reign, and such it was in the present. The same spirit that had animated the former parliament, seemed redoubled in this. They insisted on the bill for excluding the Duke of York from the succession; they persisted in declaring that all Papists should be banished, and their children educated in the Protestant religion; that the doctrine of passive obedience was injurious to the rights of society. In a word, the leaders of the opposition were resolved to be displeased with every measure the King could propose, and prepared to recall the for­mer aristocracy into the kingdom. Charles, seeing that nothing could be expected from counsels manag­ed by party, and not deliberation, once more dissolv­ed this parliament, with a stedfast resolution of never calling another.

This was a stroke they had never expected, and which the times alone could justify. From the mo­ment the royal and parliamentary commotions were ended, Charles seemed to rule with despotic power, and was resolved to leave to his successor the faults and the misfortunes of his administration. His tem­per, which had been always easy and merciful, be­came arbitrary, and even cruel; he entertained spies and informers round the throne, and imprisoned all such as he thought most daring in their designs. He resolved to humble the Presbyterians; all such were divested of their employments, and their places filled with such as approved the doctrine of non-re­sistance. The clergy testified their zeal to the court by their writings and sermons; the partizans of the King were most numerous; but those of the opposite faction were more enterprising; the mutual animo­fity of each was inflamed into rage and rancour, and the King openly declared himself at the head of a [Page 67] faction. The city of London particularly fell under his resentment; he deprived them of their charter, and only restored it when he had subjected the elec­tion of their magistrates to his immediate authority.

Such an arbitrary administration could not fail of exciting new insurrections; several noblemen, among whom were the Duke of Monmouth, the King's na­tural son, the Lord Shaftesbury, Russel, Grey, and others, entered into a combination to destroy the King, which was called after the Rye-house plot. The conspirators met at the house of one Shepherd, a wine-merchant, where they proposed a rising in London, Bristol, Devonshire, and Cheshire. They agreed upon a declaration for justifying their design, but the scheme was at first delayed from the difficulty of the preparations previous to taking the field, and soon after discovered by one Keiling, who expected to earn a pardon for himself by impeaching his asso­ciates. As the plot began to open, new informers came in; Monmouth absconded, Grey escaped the messenger who had been sent to arrest him, Russel was committed to the Tower, and Shaftesbury, who foresaw the danger, had taken refuge in Holland. Lord Essex, Sidney, the great philosopher and law­giver, and Hampden, grandson of the famous man of that name, were informed against, and committed to confinement.

The principal informer upon this occasion was Lord Howard, a man every way debauched, and who was willing to accept infamy for safety: by his evidence Russel and Sidney were condemned, and died with that intrepidity which was worthy a bet­ter cause. While these men were thus executed, Monmouth was in the mean time soliciting his par­don; and he who was most culpable, as his crime was most unnatural, easily obtained it.

The severities exercised in the latter part of this reign arose merely from the influence of the Duke [Page 68] of York, who was as much inclined to cruelty by nature, as his brother Charles was prone to forgive­ness. His authority was become terrible even to the ministry; by his advice the King seized upon all the charters of the corporations, in order to extort mo­ney for having them renewed. Partiality and op­pression were the instruments of his power, and bi­gotry and innovation the objects of his aim. At this period the reign of Charles was as absolute as that of any Monarch in Christendom, and new dis­contents and treasons were secretly diffusing their poison, the spirit of liberty still struggling hard against the spirit of obedience, which the clergy at­tempted to inculcate. Another civil war threatened the nation, still more dreadful than the former, as the forces were more equally divided. But Charles happily died before those calamities could return; he was suddenly seized with an apoplectic fit, in the fifty-fourth year of his age, and the twenty-fifth of his reign. The people, though they despised his ad­ministration, loved his person; they were willing to bear with the faults of one whose whole behaviour was a continued instance of good-nature and affabi­lity; but they were by no means willing to grant the same indulgence to his successor, whom they hated for his pride, his religion, his cruelty, and connections. He was unfit to walk in the irregular steps of his predecessor; and, when he pursued the same route, fatal experience soon convinced him that he had at once mistaken himself and the people he attempted to command.

But, though England, during the reign of Charles, seemed still, in some measure, agitated like the ocean after a storm, yet commerce continued to increase with its usual celerity and success. The manufac­ture of certain stuffs, glass, copper, steel, paper, hats, and stockings, were now brought to perfec­tion. Upon the banishing the Protestants from [Page 69] France, numbers came and settled here, and brought their arts with them. This application to arts and commerce gave England great weight in the balance of Europe; Britain became the center of politics and arms. Though literature was but little encouraged by the Sovereign, yet the learned made great profi­ciency in every department of science; and the philosophers of England began to take the lead. Newton, Tillotson, Burnet, Hobbes, and Shaftes­bury enlarged the land-marks of human knowledge; Butler, Dryden, Otway, gave strength and proprie­ty to the language. In a word, the character of the nation now began to alter; the natural rudeness of the inhabitants began to take a polish from good breeding, and British ferocity to meliorate into cha­rity and humanity.

I am, &c.

LETTER IX.

AS we descend, we find the materials for English history increase; the minutest transactions are recorded with prolixity; and these, however dry and unimproving to some, are yet both interesting and satisfactory to others. In such a profusion of mate­rials I must be content rather to give the spirit of the following reigns, than pretend to exhibit an hi­storical detail of particular interests and intrigues. It will be enough to mark those strong out-lines that may probably escape the wreck of time, when the internal colouring shall fade. As history increases in time by the addition of new events, an epitome becomes more necessary to abridge its excrescences.

The Duke of York, who succeeded his brother, with the title of King James the Second, had been bred a Papist, and was strongly bigotted to his prin­ciples. [Page 70] It is the property of that religion, almost ever, to contract the sphere of the understanding; and, until people are, in some measure, disengaged from its prejudices, it is impossible to lay a just claim to extensive views, or consistency of design. The intellects of this Prince were naturally weak, and his bigotted principles still rendered them more fee­ble; he conceived the ridiculous project of reigning in the same arbitrary manner of his predecessor, and changing the established religion of his country, at a time when his person was hated, and the establish­ed religion was universally approved.

The people of England were now entirely changed from what they had been in the times of Henry, Mary, and Elizabeth, who had altered religion at will. Learning was now as much cultivated by the laity as by the priesthood; every man now pretended to think for himself, and had rational grounds for his opinion. In the beginning of the reformation the Monarchs had only to bring over the clergy, in order totally to change the modes of belief, for the people were entirely guided by their pastors. To influence the priesthood was an easy task. The hopes of preferment, or the fears of degradation, entirely subjected the consciences of the clergy to the royal will. Such it was then; but the circum­stances of the nation were, at present, entirely al­tered; and, to make a change in religion, it would have been necessary to tamper with every individual in the state. But James had no idea of the alter­ation of circumstances; his situation, he thought, supplied him with authority, and his zeal furnished him with hope of accomplishing this chimerical de­sign.

The success he met with in crushing a rebellion, in the opening of his reign, seemed to promise a favourable omen towards the completion of his wishes. The Duke of Monmouth, who had long [Page 71] been at the head of faction, and inflamed all the discontent that molested the late King's reign, was now resolved to aim at the crown. He was the darl­ing of the people; and some averred that the King had married his mother, and owned his legitimacy at his death. The Earl of Argyle seconded his views, and they formed a scheme of a double insur­rection. Argyle first landed in Scotland, published his manifestoes, put himself at the head of two thou­sand five hundred men, and attempted to influence the nation; but, a formidable body of the King's forces coming against him, his army fell away, and he himself, after being wounded in attempting to escape, was taken by a peasant, standing up to his neck in water. Being brought to Edinburgh, he prepared for death, well knowing that it was not in the King's nature to forgive an enemy.

The Duke of Monmouth was not more fortunate; he sailed from the Texel with three vessels, and ar­rived on the coasts of Dorsetshire with about four­score followers. The country soon flocked in to his standard, and in two days his army was increased to two thousand men. The Earl of Feversham was sent to oppose him, and took post at Sedgemore, a village in Somersetshire. Monmouth resolved to fight him, and began his march about eleven in the night, with profound silence; but the Royalists were prepared for his reception. The action began at day-break; Lord Grey, who commanded the Duke of Monmouth's horse, was routed at the first onset. The Duke, at the head of his infantry, bravely maintained his ground until he was charged in flank by the enemy's horse, who had been just now victo­rious. A total rout ensued; three hundred were killed in the engagement, and a thousand in the pursuit. The Duke escaped the carnage, and, in a shepherd's disguise, fled on foot, attended by a faith­ful companion, who had followed his fortunes into [Page 72] England. Thus they travelled onward towards Dor­setshire, till, quite exhausted with hunger and fa­tigue, they lay down in a field, and covered them­selves with stubble. In this forlorn situation he was found, with some pease in his pocket, which he had gathered in the fields to sustain life. His spirit sunk with his misfortunes; he wrote to the King; im­plored his mercy; the King gave him an audience, as if willing to satisfy his vengeance with the sight of a rival's misery. But his death was determined, and no intreaties could extort royal clemency. On the seaffold he resumed his former courage, handled the ax, declared that he meant well to the nation, and his head was cut off, but not till after the third blow.

But it were happy for the nation, and fortunate for the King, if the blood that was already shed had been thought a sufficient explation for the late offence. The victorious army behaved with the most savage cruelty to the prisoners taken after the battle. Their inhumanity was properly seconded by Jefferies, who was sent on the western circuit to try the insurgents. His furious thirst of blood being inflamed by continual intoxication, he threatened, calumniated, and threw aside even the appearance of clemency. Men and women indiscrimately felt the effects of his savage zeal; and not less than two hundred and fifty persons expired under circum­stances of wanton cruelty. Cruel Kings ever find cruel ministers.

It was not to be expected, that these butcheries could acquire the King the love or the confidence of his people, or tend to alter their opinions, as they rather excited the secret abhorrence of every honest man. Yet he thought this a time favourable for the carrying on his scheme of religion and ar­bitrary government. An attempt at arbitrary power in Charles was, in some measure, excusable, as he [Page 73] had a republican faction to oppose; and it might have been prudent, at that time, to overstep justice, in order to attain security; but the same designs in James were as unnecessary as impracticable, since there were few republicans remaining, and the people were satisfied with limited monarchy. But this weak and deluded Monarch was resolved to imitate one or two Princes of Europe, who had just before rendered themselves absolute; and he was incited to this project by Lewis XIV, who secretly desired his de­struction. Thus instigated, he began his designs with the measures which he should not have used till their completion. He sent a splendid embassy to Rome, to acknowledge his obedience to the Pope. Innocent, who then filled the chair, was too good a politician to approve those childish measures, and gave his ambassador a very cool reception. He was sensible that the King was openly striking at those laws and opinions which it was his business to un­dermine in silence and security. The Cardinals were even heard facetiously to declare, that the King should be excommunicated for thus endeavouring to over­turn the small remains of Popery that yet subsisted in England.’

James, notwithstanding his discouragements, was yet resolved to prosecute his favourite scheme with vigour. Upon every occasion the Catholics shared his confidence and favour. Hugh Peters, his con­fessor, ruled his conscience, and drove him blindly forward to attempt innovation. He became every day more and more ambitious of making converts; the Earl of Sunderland sacrificed his religion to his ambition; the Earl of Rochester lost his employ­ment of treasurer for refusing to alter his religion. The King stooped so low as to his officers; a rough soldier one day answered his remonstrances by say­ing that he was pre-engaged, for he had promised the King of Morocco, when he was quartered at [Page 74] Tangiers, that, should he ever change his religion, he would turn Mahometan.

An Ecclesiastical Court was erected, with power to punish all delinquents, or such so reputed by the court, with all manner of ecclesiastical censures. Before this court was summoned the Vice-chancellor of Cambridge, for having refused to admit one Francis, a Benedictine Monk, to the degree of ma­ster of arts; the Vice-chancellor was deprived of his office, but the university persisted in their re­fusal, and the King thought proper to desist from his purpose. The Vice-president and fellows of Magda­len-college in Oxford were treated with more seve­rity. They refused to admit one Farmer, a new convert, and one of a profligate life, who was nominated by the King to the place of President, now become vacant. The King next nominated Parker, Bishop of Oxford; but he was equally ob­noxious for the same reasons. The King repaired in person to Oxford; he reproached the fellows with insolence and disobedience; but neither he, nor his ministers, could prevail to alter the resolutions of this society. The fellows were expelled by his or­der, and their places filled with Papists, who he knew would be more obedient to his commands.

His designs hitherto were sufficiently manifest; but he was now resolved entirely to throw off the mask. By his permission the Pope's Nuncio made his public entry into Windsor in his pontificals, pre­ceded by the cross, and attended by a great num­ber of monks in the habit of their respective orders. He next published a declaration for liberty of con­science, by which all restraints upon Popery were taken away. The Church of England took the alarm; the peculiar animosity of the people against the Catholic religion proceeded not less from reli­gious than temporal motives. It is the spirit of that [Page 75] religion to favour arbitrary power, and its reproach to encourage persecution. The English had too osten smarted under both to be willing again to sub­mit to either. Seven Bishops, who had received the King's express orders to cause this declaration of liberty of conscience to be read in their churches, refused to comply. They drew up a modest petition to excuse their refusal, which only served to increase the King's resentment and rage. They were cited before the council, and still adhered to their former resolution with that firmness which is the characteristic of vir­tue. The Attorney-general was ordered to prose­cute them for publishing sedition, and abridging the King's prerogative. They were committed prisoners to the Tower, conducted thither amidst the prayers and condolence of an incredible multitude of the populace, who regarded them as sufferers for truth. The day appointed for their tryal arrived; this cause was looked upon as the crisis of English freedom; the council managed the debate on both sides with learning and candour; the jury withdrew into a chamber, where they passed the whole night, but next morning returned into court, and declared the Bishops not guilty. The joy of the people, on this occasion, was inexpressible; the whole city, and the country around, seemed at once to catch the shouts of exultation; they even reached the camp, where the King was then sitting at dinner, who heard them with indignation and amazement.

If the Bishops testified the readiness of martyrs, in support of their religion, James shewed no less obstinacy in his attempts towards the establishment of his own. Finding the clergy averse to his de­signs, he next tried what he could do with the army. He thought, if one regiment would promise implicit obedience, their example would soon induce others to the same compliance. He ordered one of the re­giments to be drawn up in his presence, and desired [Page 76] that such as were against his late declaration of li­berty should lay down their arms. He was surprized to see the whole battalion ground their arms, except two officers and a few Roman Catholic soldiers.

Opposition only served to increase the infatuated Monarch's zeal; he was continually stimulated by his Queen and his priests to proceed rashly onward. But he was particularly urged on by the Jesuit Pe­ters, his confessor, an ambitious and intriguing priest, whom some historians have even accused of being the creature of the Prince of Orange, the King's son-in-law, who had long since conceived hopes of seizing the crown. James now, therefore, issued orders for prosecuting all those clergymen who had forborne to read his declaration. He placed one Gifford, a Doctor of the Sorbonne, at the head of Magdalen College, and likewise nominated him to the see of Oxford, lately become vacant. Every member of the Church of England now saw their danger; and Whigs and Tories united their efforts to oppose it.

William, Prince of Orange, had married Mary the daughter of King James. This Prince had been early immersed in danger, calamities, and politics; the designs of France, and the turbulence of Hol­land, had served to sharpen his talents, and given him a propensity for intrigue. This great politician and soldier concealed beneath a phlegmatic appear­ance, a most violent and boundless ambition, all his actions were levelled at power, while his discourse ne­ver betrayed the wishes of his heart. His temper was cold and severe, his genius active and piercing; he was valiant without ostentation, and politic without address; disdaining the pleasures, or the elegancies of life, yet eager after the phantom of pre-eminence. He was no stranger to the murmurs of the English, and was resolved to turn them to his interest. He [Page 77] therefore accepted the invitations of the nobility and others, and still more willingly embarked in the cause, as he found the malecontents had concerted their measures with prudence and secrecy.

A fleet was equipped sufficient to transport fifteen thousand troops; and it was at first given out that this armament was designed against France. James, at length, began to see his own errors and the dis­contents of the people; he would now have retracted his measures in favour of Popery, but it was too late; the fleet of the Prince was already sailed, and had landed thirteen thousand troops at the village of Broxholme in Torbay.

The expectations of the Prince of Orange seemed, at first, to be frustrated; very few Englishmen of­fered him their services, though the people were, in general, well affected to his design. Slight repulses were not sufficient to intimidate a general who had, from early youth, encountered adversity; he conti­nued ten days in expectation of being joined by the malecontents without success; but, just when he be­gan to deliberate about reimbarking his forces, he was joined by several persons of consequence, and the country people came flocking to his standard. From this day his numbers began to increase; the nobility, which had composed the court and council of King James, now left their old Master to solicit protection from the new.

Lewis XIV. had long foreseen this defection, and had formerly offered the King thirty thousand men for his security. This was then refused by James, by the advice of Sunderland, his favourite, who was secretly in the interests of the Prince of Orange. James, however, now requested assistance from France, when it was too late for his service: he wrote in vain to Leopold, Emperor of Germany, who only returned for answer, that what he had foreseen had happened. He had some dependence on his fleet, [Page 78] but they were entirely disaffected. In a word, his interests were deserted by all; for he had long de­serted them himself. He was at the head of an army of twenty thousand men, and it is possible that, had he led them to the combat without granting them time for deliberation, they might have fought in his favour; but he was involved in a maze of fears and suspicions; the defection of those he most con­fided in took away his power of deliberation, and his perplexity was increased, when told that the Prince of Denmark and Anne, his favourite daughter, had gone over to the Prince of Orange. In this exigence he could not repress his tears, but in the agony of his heart was heard to exclaim, God help me, my own children have forsaken me.

He now hung over the precipice of destruction! invaded by one son-in-law, abandoned by another, hated by his subjects, and detested by those who had suffered beneath his cruelty. He assembled the few noblemen who still adhered to his interests, and de­manded their advice and assistance. Addressing him­self to the Earl of Bedford, father to Lord Russel, who was beheaded by James's intrigues in the pre­ceding reign, My Lord, said he, you are an honest man, have great credit, and can do me signal service. Ah, Sir, replied the Earl, I am old and feeble, I can do you but little service; but I once had a son that could have assisted you, but he is no more. James was so struck with this reply, that he could not speak for some minutes.

The King was naturally timid; and some counsel­lors about him, either sharing his fears, or bribed by the Prince, contributed to increase his apprehensions. They reminded him of the fate of Charles I, and ag­gravated the turbulence of the people. He was, at length, persuaded to think of flying from a nation he could no longer govern, and of taking refuge at the court of France, where he was sure of finding [Page 79] assistance and protection. Thus instructed, he first sent away his Queen, who arrived safely at Calais; and soon after, disguising himself in a plain dress, he went down to Feversham, and embarked on board a small vessel for France. His misfortunes still con­tinued to follow him; the vessel was detained by the common people, who not knowing their Sovereign, robbed, insulted, and abused him. He was now per­suaded by the Earl of Winchelsea to return to Lon­don, where he was once more received amidst the acclamations of the people.

The return of James was by no means agreeable to William, though he well knew how to dissemble. It was his interest and his design to increase the for­saken Monarch's apprehensions, so as to induce him to fly. He therefore received the news of his return with a haughty air, and ordered him to leave White­hall, and retire to Richmond. The King remon­strated against Richmond, and desired that Rochester might be appointed as the place of his abode. The Prince perceived his intention was to leave the king­dom; nor did one wish for flight more ardently than did the other desire him away. The King soon con­curred with his designs: after staying but a short time at Rochester, he fled to the sea-side, attended by his natural son the Duke of Berwick, where he embarked for France, and arrived in safety, to en­joy, for the rest of life, the empty title of a King, and the appellation of a Saint, a title which still flat­tered him more. Here he continued to reside among a people who pitied, ridiculed, and despised him. He inrolled himself in the order of Jesuits; and the court of Rome, for whom he had lost all, repaid him only with indulgences and pasquinades.

From this moment the constitution of England, that had fluctuated for so many ages, was fixed. The nation, represented by its parliament, deter­mined [Page 80] the long contested limits between the King and the people; they prescribed to the Prince of Orange the terms by which he was to rule; they chose him for King, jointly with Mary, who was the next Protestant heir to the crown. They were crowned with titles of William III. and Mary, King and Queen of England. The Prince saw his ambi­tion, at length, gratified; and his wisdom was repaid with that crown which the folly of his predecessor had given away.

I am, &c.

LETTER X.

THOUGH William was chosen King of Eng­land, his power was limited on every side; and the opposition he met with from his parliaments still lessened the regal authority. His sway in Hol­land, where he was but the Stadtholder, was far more arbitrary; so that he might, with greater propriety, have been called the King of the United Provinces, and the Stadtholder of England. He was not suffi­ciently acquainted with the difficulty of governing the nation by which he was elected; he expected in them a people ready to second the views of his am­bition in humbling France; but he found them more apt to fear for the invasion of their domestic liberties from himself.

His reign commenced, however, with the same attempt which had been the principal cause of all the disturbances in the preceding reign, and had ex­cluded the Monarch from the throne. William was a Calvinist, and naturally averse to persecution. He therefore began by attempting to repeal those laws that enjoined uniformity of worship; and, though he could not entirely succeed in his design, yet a tole­ration [Page 81] was granted to such Dissenters as should take the oaths of allegiance, and hold no private conven­ticles. The Papists also enjoyed the lenity of his government; and, though the laws against them con­tinued to subsist, yet they were seldom put into rigo­rous execution. What was criminal in James was virtuous in his successor: James only wanted to in­troduce persecution by pretending to disown it; Wil­liam was averse to persecution from principle; and none suffered for religious opinions during his reign.

But, though William was acknowledged in Eng­land, Scotland was still undetermined. The parlia­ment of that country, however, soon recognized his authority, and took that opportunity to abolish epis­copacy, which had been long disagreeable to the na­tion. Nothing now remained to the deposed Mo­narch, of all his former dominions, but Ireland. His cause was espoused by all the Catholics of that coun­try, who were much more numerous there than those of the Protestant persuasion. The King of France, either touched with compassion for his sufferings, or willing to weaken a rival kingdom by internal dis­sensions, granted James a fleet and some troops, to assert his claims there. On the seventh day of May this unhappy Monarch embarked at Brest, and on the twenty-second arrived at Kinsale. He was re­ceived by the Catholics of Ireland with open arms. The Protestants, who were unanimously attached to King William, had been previously disarmed by Tyr­connel, their Lord-lieutenant, and a Papist. James made his public entry into Dublin amidst the accla­mations of the inhabitants. He was met by a Popish procession, bearing the host, which he publicly adored; and this served to alienate the few Protestants of that kingdom, who still adhered to his cause. A small party of that religion were resolved to defend their lives and religion in the little city of London-derry. They were besieged by the forces of King [Page 82] James, and suffered all the complicated miseries of war, famine, and bigotted cruelty; but, deter­mined never to yield, they rejected capitulation, and always repulsed the besiegers with considerable loss. At length, supplies and succours arriving from Eng­land, King James's army thought proper to raise the siege.

The cruelties exercised upon the Protestants were as shocking as unnecessary; soldiers were permitted to pillage them without redress; and they were com­pelled to accept base money in exchange for those commodities they were forced to sell. But their suf­ferings were soon to have a period. The Duke of Schomberg was sent over, with assistance; and Wil­liam himself soon after followed, and landed at Car­rickfergus. He was met by numbers of the Protes­tants, who had fled from persecution; and now, at the head of six-and-thirty thousand men, he was re­solved to go in quest of the enemy. Having march­ed to Dundalk, and then to Ardee, he, at length, came in sight of the Irish army. The river Boyne lay between the two armies, the front of the Irish being secured by a morass and a rising ground. These obstacles were insufficient to prevent the ar­dour of William, who, when his friend the Duke of Schomberg expostulated upon the danger boldly, repli­ed, That a tardy victory would be worse than a defeat. The Duke, finding his advice not relished, retired to his tent in a melancholy manner, as if he had a prescience of his own misfortune. Early in the morning, at six o'clock, King William gave orders to pass the river; the army passed in three different places, and the battle began with unusual vigour. The Irish troops, which have been reckoned the best in Europe abroad, have always fought indiffer­ently at home; they fled, after a long resistance, with precipitation, and left the French and Swiss regi­ments, who came to their assistance, to make the [Page 83] best retreat they could. William led on his horse in person, and contributed, by his activity and vigilance, to secure the victory. James was not in the battle, but stood aloof, during the action, on the hill of Dunmore, surrounded with some squadrons of horse; and, at intervals, was heard to exclaim, when he saw his own troops repulsing the enemy, O spare my Eng­lish subjects. The Irish lost about fifteen hundred men, and the English about one third of that num­ber; but the death of the Duke of Schomberg, who was shot as he was crossing the water, seemed to out­weigh all the numbers of the enemy. He had been long a soldier of fortune, and fought under almost every power in Europe. His skill in war was un­paralleled, and his fidelity equal to his courage. The number of battles in which he had been per­sonally engaged, was said to equal the number of his years; and he died aged eighty-two. James fled, regardless of the safety of his soldiers. William rode round the scene of slaughter, relieving the wounded, as well of the enemy's troops as his own. O Regan, an old Irish captain, was heard to say upon this oc­casion, That, if the English would exchange gene­rals, the conquered army would fight the battle over again.

This blow totally depressed the hopes of James; he fled to Dublin, advised the magistrates to get the best terms they could from the victor, then set out for Waterford, where he embarked for France, in a vessel prepared for his reception. Had he possessed either conduct or courage, he might still have headed his troops, and fought with advantage; but prudence forsook him with good fortune.

His friends were still resolved to second his inter­ests, though he had abandoned them himself. After his retreat, another desperate battle was fought at Aughrim, in which his adversaries were again victo­rious; Limeric, a strong city in the southern part of [Page 84] the kingdom, still held out in his favour. This city was besieged, and made a brave defence; but, de­spairing of the King's fortunes, the garrison, at length, capitulated; the Roman Catholics, by this capitulation, were restored to the enjoyment of such liberty in the exercise of their religion, as they had possessed in the reign of Charles II; and about fourteen thousand of those who had fought in favour of King James, had permission to go over to France, and transports were provided for their reception.

The conqueft os Ireland being thus completed, the only hopes of the fugitive King now depended on the assistance of Lewis XIV, who promised to make a descent upon England in his favour. The French King was punctual; he supplied the fugitive Monarch with an army consisting of a body of French troops, some English and Scotch refugees, and the Irish regiments which had been transported from Limeric into France, by long difcipline, now become excellent soldiers. This army was assembled between Cherbourg and La Hogue; King James commanded it in person; and more than three hundred transports were provided for landing it on the English shore. Tourville, the French admiral, at the head of sixty-three ships of the line, was appointed to favour the descent, and had orders to attack the enemy, if they should attempt to oppose him. All things conspired to revive the hopes of the hitherto unfortunate King.

These preparations on the side of France were soon known at the court of England, and precautions were taken for a vigorous opposition; all the secret machinations of the banished King's adherents were early discovered to the English ministry by spies; and they took proper measures to defeat them. Ad­miral Russel was ordered to put to sea with all pos­sible expedition; and he soon appeared with ninety-nine ships of the line, besides frigates and fireships. Both fleets met at La Hogue. On the success of [Page 85] this engagement all the hopes of James depended; but the victory was on the side of the English, and of num­bers; the fight continued ten hours, and the pursuit two days; fifteen French men of war were destroyed; and the blow was so decisive, that from that time France seemed to relinquish her claims to the ocean.

James was now reduced to the lowest ebb of de­spondence; his designs upon England were quite frustrated; nothing was now left his friends but ter­rors and despair, or the hopes of assassinating the Monarch on the throne. These base attempts, as barbarous as they were useless, were not intirely dis­agreeable to the temper of James: it is said, he en­couraged and proposed them; but they all ended in the destruction of their undertakers. He passed the rest of his days at St. Germains, a pensioner on the bounties of Lewis, and assisted by occasional libera­lities from his daughter, and friends in England. He died in 1700, at St. Germains. Some pretend that miracles were wrought at his tomb. We have seen few deposed Kings that have not died with a reputa­tion for sanctity.

The defeat at La Hogue confirmed King William's safety and title to the crown: the Jacobites were now a feeble and a disunited faction; new parties therefore arose among those who had been friends of the revolution, and William found as much oppo­sition from his parliament at home, as from the ene­my in the field. His chief motive for accepting the crown was to engage England more deeply in the concerns of Europe. It had ever been his ambition to humble the French, whom he considered as the most formidable enemies of that liberty which he idolized; and all his politics lay in making alliances against them. Many of the English, on the other hand, had neither the same animosity against the French, nor the same terrors of their increasing power; they therefore considered the interests of the [Page 86] nation as sacrificed to foreign connections, and com­plained, that the war on the continent fell most hea­vily on them, though they had the least interest in its success. To these motives of discontent was added his partiality to his own countrymen, in pre­judice of English subjects, together with his proud reserve and sullen silence, so unlike the behaviour of all their former Kings. William heard their complaints with the most phlegmatic indifference; the interests of Europe alone employed all his atten­tion; but, while he incessantly waked over the schemes of contending Kings and nations, he was unmindful of the cultivation of internal polity. Pa­triotism was ridiculed as an ideal virtue; the prac­tice of bribing a majority in parliament became uni­versal. The example of the great was caught up by the vulgar; all principle, and even decency, was gradually banished; talents lay uncultivated; and the ignorant and profligate were received into favour.

William, upon accepting the crown, was resolved to preserve, as much as he was able, the privileges of a Sovereign. He was, as yet, intirely unacquainted with the nature of a limited monarchy, which was not then thoroughly understood in any part of Eu­rope, except England alone. He therefore often controverted the views of his parliament, and was directed by arbitrary councils. One of the first in­stances of this was, in the opposition he gave to the bill for triennial parliaments; it had past the two houses, and was sent up to receive the royal assent, which William refused to grant; the commons then voted, that whoever advised the King to this mea­sure, was an enemy to his country. The bill, thus rejected, lay dormant for another season; and, being again brought in, the King found himself obliged, though reluctantly, to comply. The same opposi­tion, and the same success, attended a bill for regu­lating tryals in cases of high treason, by which the [Page 87] accused was allowed a copy of his indictment, and a list of the names of his jury, two days before his tryal, together with council to plead in his de­fence. That no person should be indicted, but upon the oaths of two faithful witnesses. This was one of the most salutary laws that had been long enact­ed; but, while penal statutes were mitigated on one hand, they were strangely increased by a number of others.

The great business of the parliament, from this period, seemed to consist in restraining corrup­tion, and bringing such to justice, as had grown wealthy from the plunder of the public. The num­ber of laws that were now enacted every session, seemed calculated for the safety of the subject; but, in reality, were symptoms of the universal corrup­tion. The more corrupt the commonwealth, the more numerous are the laws.

William was willing to admit all the restraints they chose to lay on the royal prerogative in Eng­land, upon condition of being properly supplied with the means of humbling the power of France. War, and foreign politics, were all he knew, or desired to understand. The sums of money granted him for the prosecution of this war were incredible; and the nation, not contented with furnishing him with such supplies as they were immediately capable of raising, involved themselves in debts, which they have never since been able to discharge. For all this profu­sion England received, in return, the empty reward of military glory in Flanders, and the conscious­ness of having given the Dutch, whom they saved, frequent opportunities of being ungrateful.

The treaty of Ryswick, at length, put an end to a war, in which England had engaged without in­terest, and came off without advantage. In the ge­neral pacification her interests seemed intirely de­serted; and, for all her blood and treasure, the only [Page 88] equivalent she received, was, the King of France's acknowledgment of King William's title to the crown.

The King, now freed from a foreign war, laid himself out to strengthen his authority at home. He conceived hopes of keeping up the forces that were granted him, in time of war, during the conti­nuance of the peace; but he was not a little mor­tified to find that the commons had passed a vote, that all the forces in English pay, exceeding seven thousand men, should be forthwith disbanded; and that those retained should be natural English sub­jects. A standing army was this Monarch's greatest delight; he had been bred up in camps, and knew no other pleasure but that of reviewing troops, or dictating to generals. He professed himself therefore entirely displeased with the proposal; and his indig­nation was kindled to such a pitch, that he actually conceived a design of abandoning the government. His ministers, however, diverted him from this re­solution, and persuaded him to consent to passing the bill. Such were the altercations between the King and his parliament; which continued dur­ing his reign. He considered his commons as a set of men desirous of power, and consequently resolved upon obstructing all his projects. He seemed but little attached to any party in the house; he veered from Whigs to Tories, as interest, or immediate exi­gence, demanded. England he considered as a place of labour, anxiety, and altercation. He used to re­tire to his seat at Loo in Holland, for those moments which he dedicated to pleasure or tranquility. It was in this quiet retreat he planned the different succes­sions of Europe, and laboured to undermine the po­litics of Lewis XIV, his insidious rival in power, and in fame. Against France his resentment was ever levelled, and he had made vigorous preparations for entering into a new war with that kingdom, [Page 89] when death interrupted the execution of his schemes. He was naturally of a very feeble constitution, and it was now almost exhausted by a life of continual action and care. He endeavoured to conceal the defects of his infirmities, and repair his health by riding. In one of his excursions to Hampton-court, his horse fell under him, and he himself was thrown off with such violence that his collar-bone was frac­tured. This, in a robust constitution, would have been a trifling misfortune, but to him it was fatal. Perceiving his end approach, the objects of his for­mer care still lay next his heart; the interests of Europe still filled him with concern. The Earl of Albemarle arriving from Holland, he conferred with him in private on the posture of affairs abroad. Two days after, having received the sacrament from Arch­bishop Tennison, he expired, in the fifty-second year of his age, after having reigned thirteen years.

William left behind him the character of a great politician, though he had never been popular; and a formidable general, though he was seldom victo­rious; his deportment was grave and sullen, nor did he ever shew any fire, but in the day of battle. He de­spised flattery, yet loved dominion. Greater as the general of Holland, than the King of England; to the one he was a father, to the other a fuspicious friend. He scrupled not to employ the engines of corruption to gain his ends; and, while he increased the power of the nation he was brought to govern, he contributed, in some measure, to corrupt their morals.

I am, &c.

LETTER XI.

THE distresses occasioned by the death of Princes are not so great, or so sincere, as the sufferers would fondly persuade us. The loss of King William was, at first thought, irreparable; but the prosperity of the kingdom seemed to acquire new vigour under his successor Queen Anne. This Princess was the second daughter of King James by his first wife; she was, by the mother's side descended from Chan­cellor Hyde, afterwards the Earl of Clarendon; and had been married to the Prince of Denmark, before her accession to the crown. She ascended the throne in the thirty-eighth year of her age, having under­gone many vicissitudes after the expulsion of her father, and many severe mortifications during the reign of the late King. But, naturally possessed of an even serene temper, she either was insensible of the disrespect shewn her, or had wisdom to conceal her resentment.

She came to the throne with the same hostile dis­positions toward France, in which the late Monarch died. She was wholly guided by the Countess of Marlborough, a woman of masculine spirit, and re­markable for intrigue, both in politics and gallantry. This lady advised a vigorous exertion of the English power against France, as she had already marked the Earl, her husband, for conducting all the opera­tions both in the cabinet and the field. Thus in­fluenced, the Queen took early measures to confirm her allies, the Dutch, with assurances of union and assistance.

Lewis XIV, now grown familiar with disappoint­ment and disgrace, yet still spurring on an exhausted kingdom to second the views of his ambition, expect­ed, from the death of King William, a field open for conquests and glory. The vigilance of his late rival [Page 91] had blasted his laurels, and circumscribed his power; for, even after a defeat, William still was formidable. At the news of his death therefore the French Mo­narch could not suppress his joy, and his court at Versailles seemed to have forgotten its usual decorum in the sincerity of their rapture. But their pleasure was soon to determine; a much more formidable ene­my was now rising up to oppose them; a more able warrior, one backed by the efforts of an indulgent mistress and a willing nation.

Immediately, upon the Queen's accession, war was declared against the French King, and that Mo­narch was accused of attempting to unite the crown of Spain to his own dominions, by placing his grand­son upon the throne of that kingdom; thus attempt­ing to destroy the equality of power among the states of Europe. This declaration was soon seconded with vigorous efforts; an alliance was formed be­tween the Imperialists, the Dutch, and the English, who contributed more to the support of the war than the other two united. Marlborough was sent over to command the English army, and the allies declared him generalissimo of all their forces. Never was a man better calculated for debate and action than he; se­rene in the midst of danger, and cool in all the fury of battle. While his Countess governed the Queen, his intrigues governed the kingdom. An indefati­gable warrior while in camp, and a skilful politician in courts; he thus became the most fatal enemy to France that England had produced, since the con­quering times of Cressy and Agincourt.

This general had learned the art of war under the famous Marshal Turenne, having been a voluntier in his army. He, at that time, went by the name of the Handsome Englishman; but Turenne foresaw his future greatness. He now gave the first proofs of his wisdom by advancing the subaltern officers, whose merit had hitherto been neglected; he gained the [Page 92] enemy's posts without fighting, ever advancing, and never losing one advantage which he had gained. To this general was opposed, on the side of France, the Duke of Burgundy, grandson of the King, a youth more qualified to grace a court, than conduct an army; the Marshal Bouflers commanded under him, a man of courage and activity. But these quali­ties in both were forced to give way to the superior powers of their adversary; after having been forced to retire by the skilful marches of Marlborough, af­ter having seen several towns taken, they gave up all hopes of acting offensively, and concluded the campaign with resolutions to prosecute the next with greater vigour.

Marlborough, upon his return to London, re­ceived the rewards of his merit, being thanked by the house of commons, and created a Duke by the Queen. The success of one campaign ever spurs on the English to aim at new triumphs. Marlborough next season returned to the field, with larger autho­rity, and greater confidence from his former success. He began the campaign by taking Bonne, the residence of the Elector of Cologne; he next retook Huys, Limbourg, and became master of all the Lower Rhine. The Marshal Villeroy, son to the King of France's governor, and educated with him, was now general of the French army. He was ever a favourite of Lewis, had shared his pleasures and his campaigns. He was brave, virtuous, and polite; but unequal to the great task of command; and still more so, when opposed to so great a rival.

Marlborough, sensible of the abilities of his an­tagonist, was resolved, instead of immediately op­posing him, to fly to the succour of the Emperor, his ally, who loudly requested his assistance, being press­ed on every side by a victorious enemy. The Eng­lish general was resolved to strike a vigorous blow for his relief, took with him about thirteen thousand [Page 93] English troops, traversed extensive countries with an hasty march, arrived at the banks of the Danube, defeated a body of French and Bavarians stationed at Donavert to oppose him, passed the Danube, and laid the Dukedom of Bavaria, that had sided with the French, under contribution. Villeroy, who at first attempted to follow his motions, seemed, all at once, to have lost sight of his enemy; nor was he apprized of his route, till he was informed of his successes.

Marshal Tallard prepared, by another route, to obstruct the Duke of Marlborough's retreat, with thirty thousand men. He was soon after joined by the Duke of Bavaria's forces; so that the French army amounted to a body of sixty thousand disci­plined veterans, commanded by the two best reputed generals at that time in France. Tallard had esta­blished his reputation by former victories; he was active, penetrating, and had risen by the dint of me­rit alone. But this ardour often rose to impetuosi­ty; and he was so short-sighted as to be unable to distinguish at the smallest distance; and the Duke was remarkable for his resolution and personal bra­very. On the other hand, the Duke of Marlbo­rough was now joined by the Prince Eugene, a ge­neral bred up from his infancy in camps, and equal to Marlborough in intrigue and military knowledge. Their talents were congenial; and all their designs seemed to flow but from one source. Their army, when combined, amounted to about fifty-two thou­sand men; troops that had been accustomed to con­quer, and had seen the French, the Turks, and the Russians fly before them. As this battle, both from the talents of the generals, the improvements in the art of war, the number and discipline of the troops, and the greatness of the contending powers, is reckoned the most remarkable of this century, it demands a more particular detail.

[Page 94] The French were posted on an hill, their right being covered by the Danube, and the village of Blenheim, and commanded by Marshal Tallard; their left was defended by a village, and headed by the Elector and Marsin, an experienced French ge­neral. In the front of their army ran a rivulet, the banks of which were steep, and the bottom marshy. Marlborough and Eugene went together to observe the posture of the French forces. Notwithstanding their advantageous situation, they were resolved to attack them immediately. The battle began between twelve and one in the afternoon. Marlborough, at the head of the English troops, having passed the rivulet, attacked the cavalry of Tallard in the right. This general was at that time reviewing the dispo­sition of his troops in the left; and the cavalry fought for some time without the presence of their general. Prince Eugene, on the left, had not yet attacked the forces of the Elector; and it was an hour before he could bring his forces up to the engagement.

Tallard had no sooner understood that his right was attacked by the Duke, but he flew to its head. He found a furious encounter already begun, his ca­valry thrice repulsed, and rallied as often. He had a large body of forces in the village of Blenheim; he made an attempt to bring them to the charge. They were attacked by a part of Marlborough's forces so vigorously, that, instead of assisting the main body, they could hardly maintain their ground. All the French cavalry, being now attacked in flank, was totally defeated. The English army, thus half victo­rious, pierced up between the two bodies of the French, commanded by the Marshal and the Elec­tor, while at the same time the forces in the village of Blenheim were separated by another detachment. In this terrible situation Tallard flew to rally some squadrons, but, from the weakness of his sight, mis­taking a detachment of the enemy for his own, he [Page 95] was taken prisoner by the Hessian troops, who were in English pay. In the mean time, Prince Eu­gene on the left, after having been thrice repulsed, put the enemy into confusion. The rout then be­came general, and the flight precipitate. The con­sternation was such that the French soldiers threw themselves into the Danube, without knowing where they fled. The officers lost all their authority; there was no general left to secure a retreat. The allies were now masters of the field of battle, and sur­rounded the village of Blenheim, where a body of thirteen thousand had been posted in the beginning of the action, and still kept their ground. These troops, seeing themselves cut off from all communi­cation with the rest of the army, threw down their arms, and surrendered themselves prisoners of war. Thus ended the battle of Blenheim, one of the most complete victories that was ever obtained. Twelve thousand French and Bavarians were slain in the field, or drowned in the Danube; thirteen thousand were made prisoners of war. Of the allies about five thousand men were killed, and eight thousand wounded or taken.

The loss of the battle is imputed to two capital er­rors committed by Marshal Tallard; first weaken­ing the center by detaching such a number of troops to the village of Blenheim, and then suffering the confederates to pass the rivulet, and form unmolest­ed. The next day, when the Duke of Marlborough visited his prisoner, the Marshal paid him the com­pliment of having overcome the best troops in the world. I hope, Sir, replied the Duke, you will except those by whom they were conquered.

A country of an hundred leagues extent fell, by this defeat, into the hands of the victor.

Having thus succeeded beyond his hopes, the Duke once more returned to England, where he found the people in a transport of joy; he was welcomed as an [Page 96] hero, who had retrieved the glory of the nation; and the Queen, the parliament, and the people were ready to second him in all his designs. The manor of Woodstock was conferred upon him for his ser­vices; and the Lord-keeper, in the name of the Peers, honoured him with that praise he so well de­served.

The success of the last campaign induced the English to increase their supplies for the next, and the Duke had fixed upon the Moselle for the scene of action; but being disappointed by Prince Lewis, who promised his assistance, he returned to the Ne­therlands to oppose Villeroy, who, in his absence, undertook the siege of Liege. Villeroy, having re­ceived advice of the Duke's approach, abandoned his enterprize, and retreated within his lines. Marlbo­rough was resolved to force them. He led his troops to the charge; after a warm but short engagement the enemy's horse were defeated with great slaughter. The infantry, being abandoned, retreated in great disorder to an advantageous post, where they again drew up in order of battle. Had the Duke been per­mitted to take advantage of their consternation, as he proposed, it is possible he might have gained a com­plete victory; but he was opposed by the Dutch offi­cers, who represented it in such a light to the Depu­ties of the States, that they refused to consent to its execution. This timidity was highly resented in England, and laid the first foundation of suspecting the Dutch fidelity; they were secretly accused of a desire to protract the war, by which they alone of all the powers of Europe were gainers.

While the arms of England were crowned with success in the Netherlands, they were not less for­tunate in Spain, where efforts were made to fix Charles, Duke of Austria, upon the throne. The greatest part of that kingdom had declared in favour of Philip IV, grandson to Lewis XIV, who had [Page 97] been nominated successor by the late King of Spain's will. We have already seen, that, by a former treaty among the powers of Europe, Charles of Au­stria was appointed heir to that crown; and this treaty had been guarantied by France herself, who now intended to reverse it in favour of a descendant of the house of Bourbon. Charles, therefore entered Spain, assisted by the arms of England; and invited by the Catalonians, who had declared in his favour. He was furnished with two hundred transports, thirty ships of war, nine thousand men, and the Earl of Peterborough, a man of even romantic bravery, was placed at their head.

One of the first exploits of these forces was to take Gibraltar, which had hitherto been deemed impreg­nable. A ledge of lofty rocks defended it almost on every side by land, and an open and stormy bay took away all security for shipping by sea. A few troops were therefore capable of defending it against the most numerous armies. The security of the garri­son proved their ruin. A detachment of eighteen hundred marines were landed upon that neck of level ground which joins it to the continent. These were incapable of attempting any thing effectual, and even destitute of hopes of succeeding. A body of sailors, in boats, were ordered to attack an half-ruined mole; they took possession of the platform, unterrified by a mine that blew up an hundred men in the air; with the utmost intrepidity they kept their ground, and, being soon joined by other seamen, took a redoubt, be­tween the mole and the town, by storm. The go­vernor was now obliged to capitulate; and the Prince of Hesse entered the town, amazed at the success of so desperate an enterprize. This was a glorious and an useful acquisition to the British dominions; their trade to the Mediterranean was thus secured; and they had here a repository capable of containing all [Page 98] things necessary for the repairing of fleets, or the equipment of armies.

Soon after the taking this important garrison, the English fleet, now mistress of the seas, attacked the French Admiral, who commanded fifty-two ships of war. After an obstinate contest the English became victorious; the French fleet sailed away, nor could it be brought again to the engagement, though the losses on either side were equal. This may be rec­koned the final effort of France by sea: in all sub­sequent engagements their chief care was rather to consult means of escape than of victory. Nor yet were the French and Spaniards willing to suffer Gibraltar to be taken, without an effort for reprisal. Philip sent an army to retake it, and France a fleet of thir­teen ships of the line; both were equally unsuccess­ful; part of the fleet was dispersed by a tempest, and another part taken by the English; while the army, having made little or no progress by land, was oblig­ed to abandon the enterprize.

Nor were the English less successful in asserting the title of Charles to the kingdom. Their army was commanded by the Earl of Peterborough, one of the most singular and extraordinary men of the age. At fifteen he fought against the Moors in Africa; at twenty he assisted in compassing the re­volution. He now carried on this war in Spain, al­most at his own expence; and his friendship for the Duke Charles was his strongest motive to undertake it. He was deformed in person, but, of a mind the most generous and active that ever inspired an honest bosom. His first attempt in Spain was to besiege Barcelona, a strong city, with a garrison of five thousand men, while his own army amounted to but seven thousand. Never was an attempt more bold, or more fortunate. The operations began by a sud­den attack on fort Monjuice, strongly situated on an [Page 99] hill, that commanded the city. The outworks were taken by storm; a shell chanced to fall into the body of the fort, and blew up the magazine of powder; the garrison of the fort was struck with consterna­tion, and surrendered without farther resistance. The town still remained unconquered; the English general erected batteries against it, and, in a few days, the governor capitulated. During the interval of capitulation, the Germans and Catalonians in the English army had entered the town, and were plun­dering all before them. The governor thought him­self betrayed: he upbraided the treachery of the ge­neral. Peterborough flew among the plunderers, drove them from their prey, and returned soon after cooly to finish the capitulation. The Spaniards were equally amazed at the generosity of the English, and the baseness of their own countrymen, who had led on to the spoil.

The conquest of all Valencia succeeded the tak­ing of this important place; the enemy, after a de­seated attempt to retake Barcelona, saw themselves deprived of almost every hope; the party of Charles was increasing every day; he became master of Ara­gon, Carthagena, and Granada; the road to Madrid, their capital city, lay open before him; the Earl of Galloway entered it in triumph, and there proclaimed Charles King of Spain, without farther opposition.

The English had scarce time to rejoice at these successes of their arms, when their attention was turned to new victories in Flanders. The Duke of Marlborough had early commenced the campaign, and brought an army of eighty thousand men into the field, and still expected reinforcements from Denmark and Prussia. The court of France wa [...] resolved to attack him before this junction. Villeroy, who commanded an army consisting of eight [...] thousand men, near Tirlemont, had orders to engage. He accordingly drew up his forces in a stron [...] [Page 100] camp; his right was flanked by the river Mehaigne, his left was posted behind a marsh, and the village of Ramillies lay in the center. Marlborough, who perceived this disposition, drew up his army accord­ingly. He knew that the enemies left could not pass the marsh, to attack him, but at a great disadvan­tage; he therefore weakened his troops on that quar­ter, and thundered on the center with superior num­bers. They stood but a short time in the center, and, at length, gave way on all sides. The horse abandoned their foot, and were so closely pursued, that almost all were cut in pieces. Six thousand men were taken prisoners, and about eight thousand were killed or wounded. This victory was almost as signal as that of Blenheim; Bavaria and Cologne were the fruits of the one, and all Brabant was gain­ed by the other. The French troops were dispirit­ed, and the city of Paris overwhelmed with con­sternation. Lewis XIV, who, in the beginning of his reign, had long been flattered with conquest, was now humbled to such a degree as might have excited the compassion of his enemies; he intreated for peace, but in vain; the allies carried all before them; and his very capital dreaded the approach of the conquerors. What neither his power, his ar­mies, nor his politics, could effect, a party in England performed; and the dissention between the Whigs and the Tories saved the dominions of France, that now seemed ready for ruin.

I am, &c.

LETTER XII.

QUEEN Anne's councils had hitherto been governed by a Whig ministry; they still pur­sued the schemes of the late King; and, upon re­publican principles, strove to diffuse freedom through­out [Page 101] Europe. In a government, where the reasoning of individuals, retired from power, generally leads those who command, the designs of the ministry must change, as the people happen to alter. The Queen's personal virtues, her successes, her adulation from the throne, contributed all to change the disposition of the nation; they now began to defend hereditary succession, non-resistance, and divine right; they were now become Tories, and were ready to con­trovert the designs of a Whig ministry, whenever a leader offered to conduct them to the charge.

These discontents were, in some measure, increas­ed by a meditated union between the two kingdoms of England and Scotland. The treaty, for this pur­pose, was chiefly managed by the ministry; and, al­though it was fraught with numberless benefits to either kingdom, yet it raised the murmurs of both. The English expected nothing from the union of so poor a nation, but a participation of their necessities; they thought it unjust, that, while Seotland was granted an eighth part of the legislature, it yet should be taxed but a fortieth part of the supplies. On the other hand, the Scotch considered that their independency would be quite destroyed, and the dignity of their crown betrayed; they dreaded an increase of taxes, and seemed not much to esteem the ad­vantages of an increased trade. In every political measure there are disadvantages on either side, which may be sufficient to deter the timid, but which a bold legislator disregards. The union, after some strug­gles, was effected; Scotland was no longer to have a parliament, but to send sixteen Peers, chosen from the body of their nobility, and forty-five commoners. The two kingdoms were called by the common name of Great Britain; and all the subjects of both were to enjoy a commun iation of privileges and ad­vantages.

[Page 102] This measure, which strengthened the vigour of government, by uniting its force, seemed to threaten the enemies of Great Britain with dangers abroad; but the discontents of the nation at home prevented the effects of its newly-acquired power. The To­ries, now become the majority, were displeased with the Whig ministry; they looked with jealousy on the power of the Earl of Godolphin and the Duke of Marlborough, who had long governed the Queen, and lavished the treasures of the nation on conquests more glorious than serviceable. To them the people imputed the burthens under which they now groan­ed, and others which they had reason to fear. The loss of a battle near Almanza in Spain, where the English army were taken prisoners, under the com­mand of the Earl of Galloway, with some other mis­carriages, tended to heighten their displeasure, and dispelled the inebriation of former success. The To­ries did not fail to inculcate and exaggerate these causes of discontent, while Robert Harley, after­wards Earl of Oxford, and Henry St. John, made soon after Lord Bolingbroke, secretly fanned the flame.

Harley had lately become a favourite of the Queen; the petulance of the Duchess of Marlbo­rough, who formerly ruled the Queen, had entirely alienated the affections of her mistress. She now placed them upon one Mrs. Masham, who was en­tirely devoted to Lord Oxford. Oxford was pos­sessed of uncommon erudition; he was polite and intriguing; he had insinuated himself into the royal favour, and determined to sap the credit of Marl­borough and his adherents. In this attempt he chose, for his second, Bolingbroke, a man of ex­alted powers of thinking, eloquent, ambitious, and enterprising. Bolingbroke was, at first, contented to act a subordinate character in this meditated oppo­ [...]tion; but, soon perceiving the superiority of his [Page 103] own talents, from being an inferior, he was resolved to become Lord Oxford's rival. The Duke of Marlborough soon perceived their growing power, and resolved to crush it in the beginning. He re­fused to join in the Privy Council, while Harley was secretary. Godolphin joined his influence in this measure; and the Queen was obliged to appease their resentment, by discharging Harley from his place: Bolingbroke was resolved to share his dis­grace, and voluntarily relinquished his employments.

This violent measure, which seemed, at first, fa­vourable to the Whig ministry, laid the first founda­tion of its ruin; the Queen was intirely displeased with the haughty conduct of the Duke; and, from that moment, he lost her confidence and affection. Harley was enabled to act now with less disguise, and to take more vigorous measures for the completion of his designs. In him the Queen reposed all her trust, though he now had no visible concern in the admi­nistration.

The Whig party, in this manner, seemed to tri­umph for some time, till an occurrence, in itself, of no great importance, served to shew the spirit of the times. Doctor Sacheverel, a minister of narrow in­tellects and bigotted principles, had published two sermons, in which he strongly insisted on the illega­lity of resisting Kings, and enforced the divine ori­gin of their authority; declaimed against the Dissen­ters, and exhorted the Church to put on the whole armour of God. There was nothing in the sermons, either nervous, well written, or clear; they owed all their celebrity to the complexion of the times, and are at present justly forgotten. Sacheverel was im­peached by the commons, at the bar of the upper house; they seemed resolutely bent upon punishing him; and a day was appointed for trying him before the Lords at Westminster-Hall. Mean while, the Tories, who, one and all, approved his principles, [Page 104] were as violent in his defence as the parliament had been in his prosecution. The eyes of the kingdom were turned upon this extraordinary tryal; the Queen herself was every day present as a private spectator. His tryal lasted some days; and vast multitudes attended him each day, as he went to the hall, shouting, and praying for his success. The body of the people espoused his cause. They de­stroyed several meeting-houses, and plundered the dwellings of Dissenters; and the Queen herself could not but relish those doctrines which contributed to extend her prerogative. The Lords were divided; they continued undetermined for some time; but, at length, after much obstinate dispute and viru­lent altercation, Sacheverel was found guilty by a majority of seventeen voices. He was prohibited from preaching, for the term of three years: his two sermons were ordered to be burnt by the hands of the common hangman. The lenity of this sentence was considered, by the Tories, as a victo­ry; and, in fact, their faction took the lead all the remaining part of this reign.

The King of France, long persecuted by fortune, and each hour fearing for his capital, once more pe­titioned for peace. Godolphin and Marlborough, who had, since the beginning of the war, enjoyed the double advantage of extending their glory, and increasing their fortunes, were intirely averse to any negotiation which tended to diminish both. The Tories, on the other hand, willing to humble the general, and his partner Godolphin, were sincerely desirous of a peace, as the only measure to attain their ends. A conference was, at length, begun at Gertruydenberg, under the influence of Marlborough, Eugene, and Zinzendorf, all three entirely averse to the treaty. The French ministers were subjected to every species of mortification; their conduct nar­rowly watched; their master insulted; and their let­ters [Page 105] opened. They offered to satisfy every com­plaint that had given rise to the war; they consented to abandon Philip IV, in Spain; to grant the Dutch a large barrier; they even consented to grant a sup­ply towards dethroning Philip; but even this offer was treated with contempt, and at length the con­ference was broken off, while Lewis resolved to ha­zard another campaign.

The designs of the Dutch, and the English gene­ral, were too obvious not to be seen, and properly explained by their enemies in England. The writers of the Tory faction, who were men of the first rank of literary merit, displayed the avarice of the Duke and the self-interested conduct of the Dutch; they insisted, that, while England was exhausting her strength in foreign conquests, she was losing her liberty at home; that her ministers were not con­tented with sharing the plunder of an impoverishing state, but were resolved upon destroying its liberties also. To these complaints were added the real pride of the then prevailing ministry, and the insolence of the Duchess of Marlborough, who hitherto had possessed more real power than the whole privy-coun­cil united. Mrs. Masham, who had first been re­commended to the Queen's favour by the Duchess, now fairly supplanted her patroness; and, by a steady attention to please the Queen, had gained all that confidence which she had reposed in her former confidante. It was too late that the Duchess per­ceived this alienation of the Queen's favour, and now began to think of repairing it by demanding an audience of her Majesty, in order to vindicate her character from every suspicion; but formal expla­nations ever widen the breach.

Mr. Hill, brother to the new favourite, was ap­pointed by the Queen to be colonel of a regiment; this the Duke of Marlborough could by no means approve. He expostulated with his sovereign; he [Page 106] retired in disgust; the Queen, by a letter, gave him [...]eave to dispose of the regiment as he should think proper; but, before it came to his hands, he had sent a letter to the Queen, desiring she would permit him to retire from his employments. This was the conjuncture which the Tories had long wished for, and which the Queen herself was internally pleased with. She now perceived herself set free from an arbitrary combination, by which she had been long kept in dependance. The Earl of Godolphin, the Duke's son-in-law, was divested of his office; and the treasury submitted to Harley, the antagonist of his ambition. Lord Somers was dismissed from be­ing president of the council, and the Earl of Ro­chester appointed in his room. In a word, there was not one Whig left in any office of state, except the Duke of Marlborough; he retained his employ­ments for a short time, unsupported and alone, an object of envy and factious reproach, till at length be found his cause irretrievable, and was obliged, after trying another campaign, to resign, as the rest of his party had done before.

As war seemed to have been the desire of the Whig party, so peace seemed to have been that of the Tories. Through the course of English histo­ry, France seems to have been the peculiar object of the hatred of the Whigs, and a continual war with that nation has been their aim. On the contrary, the Tories have not regarded that nation, with such opposition of principle; and a peace with France has generally been the result of a Tory administration. For some time therefore, a negotiation for peace had been carried on between the court of France and the new ministers, who had a double aim in this mea­sure; namely, to mortify the Whigs and the Dutch, and to free their country from a ruinous war which had all the appearance of becoming habitual to the constitution.

I am, &c.

LETTER XIII.

THE conferences for peace were first opened at London; and some time after the Queen sent the Earl of Strafford as ambassador into Holland, to communicate the proposals which the French King had made towards the re-establishment of the gene­ral tranquility. The spirit of the times was now changed; Marlborough's aversion to such measures could now no longer retard the negotiation; Lord Strafford obliged the Dutch to name plenipotentiaries, and to receive those of France. The treaty began at Utrecht; but as all the powers concerned in this conference, except France and England, were averse to every accommodation, their disputes served rather to retard than accelerate a pacification. The English ministry, however, had foreseen and provided against those difficulties. Their great end was to free the subjects from a long unprofitable war, a war where conquest could add nothing to their power, and a defeat might be prejudicial to internal tranquility. As England had borne the chief burthen of the war, it was but just to expect that it would take the lead in dictating the terms of peace. There were, however, three persons of very great interest and power, who la­boured, by every art, to protract the negotiation; those were the Duke of Marlborough, Prince Eugene, and Heinsius the Dutch grand pensionary. Prince Eugene even came over to London, in order to re­tard the progress of a peace, which seemed to interrupt his career of glory; he found at court such a recep­tion as was due to his merits and fame; but, at the same time, such a repulse as the proposals he made seemed to deserve.

This negotiation to London failing of effect, the allies practised every artifice to intimidate the Queen, and blacken the character of her ministers; to raise [Page 108] and continue a dangerous ferment among the people, to obstruct her councils, and divulge her designs. Her ministers were very sensible of their present dan­gerous situation; they perceived her health was daily impairing, and her successor countenanced the oppo­site faction. In case of her death, they had nothing to expect but prosecution and ruin, for obeying her commands; their only way therefore was to give up their present employments, or hasten the conclu­sion of a treaty, the utility of which would be the best argument with the people in their favour. The peace therefore was hastened; and this haste, in some measure, relaxed the ministers obstinacy, in insisting upon such terms and advantages as they had a right to demand. Seeing that nothing was to be expected from the concurrence of the allies, the courts of Lon­don and Versailles resolved to enter into a private treaty, in which such terms might be agreed on as would enable both courts to prescribe terms to the rest of the contending powers.

In the mean time the Duke of Marlborough having been deposed from his office of general, the command of the English army in Flanders was given to the Duke of Ormond; but, at the same time, private orders were given him not to act with vigour against an enemy, which was upon the point of being recon­ciled by more mild methods of treatment. The al­lies, thus deprived of the assistance of the English, still continued their animosity, and were resolved to continue the war separately; they had the utmost confidence in Prince Eugene, their general; and, though lessened by the defection of the British forces, they were still superior to those of the enemy, which were commanded by Marshal Villars, a man who seemed to possess all the great qualities, and all the soibles of his country, in a supreme degree; valiant, generous, alert, lively, boastful, and avaricious. The loss of the British forces was soon severely felt in the [Page 109] allied army. Villars attacked a separate body of their troops incamped at Denain, under the command of the Earl of Albemarle. Their intrenchments were forced, and seventeen battalions either killed or taken, the Earl himself, and all the surviving officers, being made prisoners of war.

These successes of Marshal Villars served to hasten the treaty of Utrecht. The British ministers at the congress, responsible at once for their conduct to their Queen, their country, and all Europe, neglected nothing that might have been serviceable either to the allies, or that might conduce to the public safety. They first stipulated that Philip V, who had been settled on the throne of Spain, should renounce all right to the crown of France, the union of two such powerful kingdoms being thought dangerous to the liberties of the rest of Europe. They covenanted that the Duke of Berry, his brother, the presumptive heir to the crown of France, after the death of the Dauphin, should also renounce his right to the crown of Spain, in case he became King of France. The Duke of Orleans was to make the same resignation. To oblige men thus to renounce their rights might have been injustice; but, for every good acquired, some inconvenience must be endured; these resigna­tions, in some measure, served to calm the world temptsted up by long war, and have since become the basis of the law of nations, to which Europe professes present submission.

By this treaty the Duke of Savoy had the island of Sicily, with the title of King, with Fenestrelles, and other places on the continent; which increase of his power seemed, in some measure, drawn from the spoils of the French monarchy. The Dutch had that barrier granted them, which they so long sought after; and, if the house of Bourbon seemed stripped of some dominion, in order to enrich the Duke of Savoy, on the other hand, the house of Austria was [Page 110] taxed to supply the wants of the Hollanders, who were put in possession of the strongest towns in Flanders. With regard to England, its glory and interests were secured. They caused the fortifica­tions of Dunkirk to be demolished, and its port to be destroyed. Spain gave up all right to Gibraltar and the island of Minorca. France resigned Hud­son's-Bay, Nova-Scotia, and Newfoundland; but they were left in possession of Cape-Breton, and the liberty of drying their fish upon the shore. Among the articles which were glorious to the English, it may be observed, that the setting free those who had been confined in the French prisons for professing the Protestant religion, was not the least. It was stipulated, that the Emperor should possess the king­dom of Naples, the Duchy of Milan, and the Spa­nish Netherlands; that the King of Prussia should have Upper Gueldre; and a time was fixed for the Emperor's acceding to these resolutions, for he had hitherto obstinately refused to assist at the negotia­tions. Thus it appears, that the English ministry did justice to all the world; but their country re­fused it to them; they were branded with all the terms of infamy and reproach by the Whig party, and accused of having given up the privileges and rights which England had to expect. Each party reviled the other in turn; the kingdom was divided into opposite factions, both so violent in their cause, that the truth, which both pretended to espouse, was attained by neither; both were virulent, and both wrong. These commotions, in some measure, served still more to impair the Queen's health. One fit of sickness succeeded another; nor did the consolation of her ministry serve to allay her anxieties; for they now had fallen out among themselves, the council-chamber being turned into a theatre for the most bitter altercations. Oxford advised a reconciliation with the Whigs, whose resentment he now began to [Page 111] fear, as the Queen's health appeared to be impaired. Bolingbroke, on the other hand, affected to set the Whigs at defiance; professed a warm zeal for the church, and mixed flattery with his other assiduities. Bolingbroke prevailed; Lord Oxford, the treasurer, was removed from his employment, and retired, me­ditating schemes of revenge, or new projects for fu­ture re-establishment. His fall was so sudden, and so unexpected, that no plan was established for sup­plying the vacancy occasioned by his disgrace. All was confusion at court; and the Queen had no lon­ger force to support the burthen; she sunk into a state of insensibility, and thus found refuge from anxiety in lethargic slumber. Every method was contrived to rouze her from this state, but in vain; her physicians dispaired of her life. The privy-council assembled upon this occasion; the Dukes of Somerset and Argyle, being informed of the despe­rate state in which she lay, entered that assembly without being summoned; the members were sur­prized at their appearance; but the Duke of Shrews­bury thanked them for their readiness to give their assistance at such a critical juncture, and desired them to take their places. They now took all the neces­sary precautions for securing the succession in the house of Hanover, sent orders to the Heralds at Arms, and to a troop of life-guards to be in readi­ness to mount, in order to proclaim the Elector of Brunswick King of Great Britain.

On the thirtieth of July the Queen seemed some­what relieved by medicines, rose from her bed, and, about eight, walked a little; when, casting her eyes on the clock that stood in her chamber, she continued to gaze for some time. One of the ladies in wait­ing asked her what she saw there more than usual? to which the Queen only answered by turning her eyes upon her with a dying look. She was soon af­ter seized with a fit of the apoplexy, from which, [Page 112] however, she was relieved by the assistance of Doctor Mead. In this state of stupefaction she continued all night; she gave some signs of life between twelve and one next day, but expired the next morning, a little after seven o'clock, having lived forty-nine years five months and six days; and having reigned more than twelve years with honour, equity, and applause. This Princess was rather amiable than great, rather pleasing than beautiful; neither her ca­pacity nor learning were remarkable. Like all those of her family, she seemed rather fitted for the private duties of life than a public station; a pattern of con­jugal affection, a good mother, a warm friend, and an indulgent mistress. During her reign none suf­fered on the scaffold for treason; so that after a long succession of faulty or cruel Kings, she shines with particular lustre. In her ended the line of the Stew­arts; a family, the misfortunes and misconducts of which are not to be paralleled in history; a family who, less than men themselves, seemed to expect from their followers more than manhood in their de­fence; a family demanding rather our pity than as­sistance, who never rewarded their friends, nor aveng­ed them of their enemies.

I am, &c.

LETTER XIV.

THE nearer we approach to our own times, in this survey of English history, the more im­portant every occurrence becomes; our own interests are blended with those of the state; and the accounts of public welfare are but the transcript of private happiness. The two parties which had long divided the kingdom, under the names of Whig and Tory, now seemed to alter their titles; the Whigs being [Page 113] styled Hanoverians, and the Tories branded with the appellation of Jacobites. The former, desired to be governed by a King, who was a Protestant, though a foreigner; the latter, by a Monarch of their own country, though a Papist. Of two inconveniencies, however, that seemed the least, where religion seemed to be in no danger; and the Hanoverians prevailed.

The Jacobites had been long flattered with the hopes of seeing the succession altered by the Earl of Oxford; but by the premature death of the Queen, all their expectations at once were blasted; the dili­gence and activity of the privy-council, in which the Hanoverian interest prevailed, completed their confusion, and they now found themselves without any leader to give consistency to their designs, and force to their councils. Upon recollection they saw nothing so eligible as silence and submission; they hoped much from the assistance of France, and still more from the vigour of the pretender.

Pursuant to the act of succession. George I, son of Ernest Augustus, first Elector of Brunswick, and Sophia, grand-daughter to James I, ascended the British throne. His mature age, being now fifty-four years old; his sagacity and experience, his nu­merous alliances, the general peace of Europe; all contributed to his support, and promised a peaceable and happy reign. His virtues, though not shining, were solid; he was of a very different disposition from the Stewart family, whom he succeeded; they were known to a proverb for leaving their friends in distress; George, on the contrary, soon after his ar­rival in England, used to say, My maxim is never to abandon my friends; to do justice to all the world; and to fear no man. To these qualifications he joined great application to business; but generally studied more the interests of those subjects he had left behind, than of these he came to govern.

[Page 114] The King first landed at Greenwich, where he was received by the Duke of Northumberland, and the Lords of the regency. From the landing-place he walked to his house in the Park, accompanied by a great number of the nobility, and other per­sons of distinction, who had the honour to kiss his hand, as they approached. When he retired to his bed-chamber, he sent for those of the nobility who had distinguished themselves by their zeal for his succession; but the Duke of Ormond, the Lord Chancellor, and Lord Trevor, were not of the num­ber; Lord Oxford too, the next morning, was re­ceived with marks of disapprobation; and none but the Whig party were admitted into any share of con­fidence. The King of a faction is but the sovereign of half his subjects; of this, however, the Monarch I speak of did not seem sensible; it was his misfor­tune, as well as that of the nation, that he was hemmed round by men who soured him with all their interests and prejudices; none now but the violent in faction were admitted into employment; and the Whigs, while they pretended to secure for him the crown, were, with all possible diligence, abridging the prerogative. An instantaneous and to­tal change was effected in all offices of honour and advantage. The Whigs governed the senate, and the court disposed of all places at pleasure; whom they would they oppressed; bound the lower orders of people with new and severe laws; and this they called liberty.

These partialities, and this oppression, soon raised discontents throughout the kingdom. The clamour of the church's being in danger was revived; jea­lousies were received, and dangerous tumults raised in every part of the country. The party cry was, Down with the Whigs; Sacheveral for ever. Dur­ing these commotions in the Pretender's favour, this [Page 115] Prince himself continued only a calm spectator on the continent, now and then sending over his emis­saries to inflame the disturbances, to disperse his in­effectual manifestoes, and to delude the unwary. Copies of a printed address were sent to the Dukes of Shrewsbury, Marlborough, Argyle, and other noblemen of the first distinction, vindicating the Pretender's right to the crown, and complaining of the injustice that was done him by receiving a foreigner. Yet, for all this, he still continued to profess the truest regard for the Catholic religion; and, instead of concealing his sentiments on that head, gloried in his principles. It was the being a Papist which had dispossessed his father of the throne; and surely the son could never hope to gain a crown by the very methods in which it was lost; but an infatuation seemed for ever to attend all the family.

However odious, at that time, the Popish super­stitions were to the people in general, yet the opinions of the Dissenters seemed still more displeasing. Re­ligion was mingled with all political disputes. The High-church party complained, that, under a Whig administration, impiety and heresy daily gained ground; that the prelates were at once negligent of religious concerns, and warm in pursuit of tem­poral blessings. A book written by Doctor Samuel Clarke, in favour of Socinianism, was strictly re­prehended; the disputes among the Churchmen rose to such a height that the ministry was obliged to in­terpose; and the clergy received orders for finishing such-like debates, and from intermeddling in affairs of state. Nothing, however, can be more impolitic in a state, than to prohibit the clergy from disputing with each other; by this means they become more animated in the cause of religion; and which ever side they defend, they become wiser and better, as they carry on the cause. To silence their disputes [...]s to lead them into negligence; if religion be not [Page 116] kept up by opposition, it falls to the ground, no longer becomes an object of public concern. Go­vernment, I say again, should never silence dispute, and should never side with either disputant.

A new parliament was now called, in which the Whigs had by far the majority; all prepossessed with the strongest aversion to the Tories, and led on by the King himself, who made no secret of his dis­pleasure. Upon their first meeting he informed them, that the branches of the revenue granted for the sup­port of civil government, were not sufficient for that purpose; he apprized them of the machinations of the Pretender, and intimated that he expected their assistance in punishing such as had endeavoured to deprive him of that blessing which he most valued, the affection of his people. As the houses were then disposed, this served to give them the alarm; and they out-went even the most sanguine expectations of the most vindictive ministry.

Their resentment began with arraigning Lord Bo­lingbroke of high treason, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. To this it was objected by one of the members of the house of commons, that nothing in the allegations laid to his charge amounted to high treason. To this there was no reply given; but, Lord Coningsby standing up, The chairman, said he, has impeached the hand, but I impeach the head; he has impeached the scholar, and I the master. I impeach Robert Earl of Oxford, and Earl Mortimer, of high treason and other crimes and misdemeanors. When there­fore this nobleman appeared the next day in the house of Lords, he was avoided, by his brother Peers, as infectious; he, whose favour had been but a little before so earnestly sought after, was now rejected and contemned. When the articles were read against him in the house of Peers, some debates arose as to the nature of his indictment, which, however, were carried by his adversaries, and the articles of im­peachment [Page 117] approved by the house; he was therefore again impeached at the bar of the house of Lords; and a motion was made that he might lose his seat, and be committed to close custody. The Earl now seeing a furious spirit of faction raised against him, and aiming at his head, was not wanting to himself, upon this emergency, but spoke to the following purpose: I am accused, says he, for having made a peace; a peace, which, bad as it is now represented, has been approved by two successive parliaments. For my own part, I always acted by the immediate directions and commands of the Queen my mistress, and never offended against any known law. I am justified in my own conscience, and unconcerned for the life of an insignificant old man. But I cannot, without the highest ingratitude, remain uncon­cerned for the best of Queens; obligation binds me to vin­dicate her memory. My Lords, if ministers of state, act­ing by the immediate commands of their Sovereign, are afterwards to be made accountable for their proceedings, it may, one day or other, be the case of all the members of this august assembly. I do not doubt therefore, that, out of regard to yourselves, your Lordships will give me an equi­table hearing; and I hope, that in the prosecution of this inquiry it will appear, that I have merited, not only the indulgence, but also the favour of this government. My Lords, I am now to take my leave of your Lordships, and of this honourable house, perhaps, for ever! I shall lay down my life with pleasure, in a cause favoured by my late dear royal mistress. And, when I consider that I am to be judged by the justice, honour, and virtue of my Peers, I shall acquiesce, and retire with great content. And, my Lords, God's will be done. On his return from the house of Lords to his own house, where he was, for that night, permitted to go, he was followed by a great multitude of people, crying out, High-church Ormond and Oxford for ever. Next day he was brought to the bar, where he received a copy of his articles, and was allowed a month to prepare his an­swer. [Page 118] Though Doctor Mead declared, that if the Earl should be sent to the Tower, his life would be in danger, it was carried, that he should be sent there, whither he was attended by a prodigious con­course of people, who did not scruple to exclaim against his prosecutors. Tumults grew more fre­quent; and this only served to increase the severity of the legislature. An act was made, decreeing, that if any persons, to the number of twelve, unlawfully assembled, should continue together one hour, after being required to disperse by a Justice of Peace, or other officer, and heard the proclamation against riots read in public, they should be deemed guilty of fe­lony, without benefit of the clergy. An act of this kind carries its own comment with it; legislators should ever be averse to enacting such laws as leave the greatest room for abuse.

A committee was now appointed to draw up ar­ticles of impeachment, and prepare evidence against him and the other impeached Lords; he was con­fined in the Tower, and there remained for two years; during which time, the kingdom was in a continual ferment, several other Lords, who had broke out into actual rebellion, and were taken in arms, being executed for treason; the ministry seemed weary of executions; and he, with his usual fore­sight, presented, upon this occasion, a petition for coming to his tryal. A day was therefore assigned him. The commons appointed a committee to en­quire into the state of the Earl's impeachment, and demanded a longer time to prepare for the tryal. The truth is, they had now began to relax in their former asperity; and the intoxication of party was not quite so strong now as when he had been first committed. At the appointed time the Peers repair­ed to the court in Westminster-Hall, where Lord Cowper presided as Lord Steward. The commons were assembled; and the King and royal family as­sisted [Page 119] at the solemnity. The prisoner was brought from the Tower, and his articles of impeachment read, with his answers and the replies of the com­mons. Sir Joseph Jekyl, one of the agents for the commons, standing up to enforce the first article of his Lordship's accusation, one of the Lords adjourn­ing the house, observed, that much time would be consumed in going through all the articles of the im­peachment; that nothing more remained than for the commons to make good the two articles of high treason contained in his charge; and that this would at once determine the tryal. His advice was agreed to by the Lords; but the commons delivered a paper containing their reasons for asserting it as their un­doubted right to carry on the impeachment in the manner they thought most conducive to their aim. On the other hand, the house of Lords insisted on their former resolution, considering it as the privi­lege of every judge to hear each cause in the man­ner he thinks most fitting. The dispute grew still more violent; a message was at length sent to the commons, intimating that the Lords intended to pro­ceed immediately to the Earl of Oxford's tryal; and, soon after repairing to the Hall of Justice, they took their places. The commons, however, did not think fit to appear; and the Earl, having waited a quarter of an hour at the bar, was dismissed for want of ac­cusers. To this dispute, perhaps, he owed his safe­ [...]y, though it is probable they would have acquitted [...]im of high treason, as none of his actions could [...]ustly suffer such an imputation. With the same [...]crimony prosecutions were carried on against Lord Bolingbroke and the Duke of Ormond; but they [...]ound safety in flight.

Such vindictive proceedings as these naturally ex­ [...]ted indignation; the people groaned to behold a [...]ew great ones close up all the avenues to royal fa­ [...]our, and rule the nation with rigour and partiality. [Page 120] In Scotland the discontent broke forth, at length, into the flames of rebellion. The Earl of Mar, as­sembling three hundred of his own vassals, in the Highlands of Scotland, proclaimed the Pretender at Castletown, and set up his standard at Brae Mar, on the sixth day of September, then assuming the title of Lieutenant-general of the Pretender's forces; he ex­horted the people to take arms in defence of their lawful Sovereign. But these preparations were weak and ill-conducted; all the designs of the rebels be­trayed to the government, the beginning of every re­volt repressed, the western counties prevented from rising, and the most prudent precautions taken to keep all suspected persons in custody, or in awe. The Earl of Derwentwater, and Mr. Foster, took the field near the borders of Scotland; and, being joined by some gentlemen, proclaimed the Pretender. Their first attempt was to seize upon Newcastle, in which they had many friends; but they found the gates shut upon them, and were obliged to retire to Hexam; while General Carpenter, having assembled a body of dragoons, resolved to attack them before their numbers were increased. The rebels had two methods of acting with success; either marching immediately into the western parts of Scotland, and there joining General Gordon, who commanded a strong body of Highlanders; or of crossing the Tweed, and attacking General Carpenter, whose forces did not exceed nine hundred men. From their usual infa­tuation neither of these schemes were put into exe­cution; for, taking the route another way, they left General Carpenter on one side, and resolved to pe­netrate into England by the western border. They accordingly advanced without either foresight or de­sign, as far as Preston, where they first heard the news that General Wills was marching at the head of six regiments of horse, and a battalion of foot, to attack them. They now therefore began to raise [Page 121] barricadoes, and to put the place in a posture of de­fence, repulsing at first the attack of the King's army with some success. Next day, however, General Wills was reinforced by the troops under Carpenter, and the rebels were invested on all sides. Foster, their General, sent Colonel Oxburgh with a trum­pet to the English commander, to propose a capitu­lation. This, however, General Wills refused, al­ledging that he would not treat with rebels; and that all they could expect was, to be spared from imme­diate slaughter. These were hard terms; but they were then obliged to submit. They accordingly laid down their arms, and were put under a strong guard. The leaders were secured, and led through London pinioned, and bound together, while the common men were confined at Chester and Liverpool.

While these unhappy circumstances attended the rebels in England, the Earl of Mar's forces, in the mean time, increased to the number of ten thousand men, and he had made himself master of the whole county of Fife. Against him the Duke of Argyle set out for Scotland, as commander in chief of the forces in North Britain; and, assembling some troops in Lothian, returned to Stirling with all possible ex­pedition. The Earl of Mar, being informed of this, at first retreated; but being joined soon after by some Clans under the Earl of Seaforth, and others by General Gordon, who had signalized himself in the Russian service, he resolved to march forward to­wards England. The Duke of Argyle, apprized of his intention, and being joined by some regiments of dragoons from Ireland, determined to give him battle in the neighbourhood of Dumblain, though his forces were by no means so numerous as those of the rebel army. In the morning therefore of the same day on which the Preston rebels had surrendered, he drew up his forces, which did not exceed three thousand five hundred men, but found himself greatly out­flanked [Page 122] by the enemy. The Duke therefore perceiv­ing the enemy making attempts to surround him, was obliged to alter his disposition; which, on account of the scarcity of general officers, was not done so expeditiously as to be all formed before the rebels be­gun the attack. The left wing therefore of the Duke's army fell in with the center of the enemy's, and supported the first charge without shrinking. This wing even seemed, for a short time, victorious, as they killed the chief leader of part of the rebel army. But Glengary, who was second in command, undertook to inspire his intimidated forces; and, waving his bonnet, cried out several times, Revenge. This animated his men to such a degree, that they followed him close to the muzzles of the muskets, pushed aside the bayonets with their targets, and with their broad-swords did great execution. A total route of that wing of the royal army ensued, and General Witham, their commander, flying full speed to Stir­ling, gave out, that all was lost. In the mean time the Duke of Argyle, who commanded in person on the right, attacked the left of the enemy, and drove them before him for two miles, though they often faced about, and attempted to rally. The Duke having thus entirely broke their left, and pushed them over the river Allen, returned to the field, where they found that part of the rebel army which had been victorious; but, instead of renewing the engage­ment, both armies continued to gaze at each other, neither caring to engage; till towards evening both sides drew off, each boasting of victory. Which ever might claim the triumph, it must be owned, that all the honour, and all the advantages of the day, belonged only to the Duke of Argyle. It was sufficient for him to have interrupted the enemies progress; and delay was to them a defeat. The Earl of Mar therefore soon found his disappoint­ments, and losses increase. The castle of Inverness, [Page 123] of which he was in possession, was delivered up to the King by Lord Lovat, who had hitherto appeared in the interest of the Pretender. The Marquis of Tullibardine left the Earl to defend his own coun­try; and many of the Clans seeing no likelihood of coming soon to a second engagement, returned home. An irregular army being much easier led to battle, than induced to bear the fatigues of a campaign.

The pretender might now be convinced of the va­nity of his expectations, in imagining that the whole country would rise up in his cause; his affairs now were actually desperate; yet, with the usual infatu­ation of the family, he resolved to hazard his person among his friends in Scotland, at a time when such a measure was totally useless. Passing therefore through France in disguise, and embarking in a small vessel at Dunkirk, he arrived, on the twenty-second day of December, on the coasts of Scotland, with only six gentlemen in his retinue. Upon his arrival in Aberdeen, he was solemnly proclaimed, and soon after made his public entry into Dundee; and, in two days more, came to Scoon, where he intended to have the ceremony of his coronation performed. He ordered thanksgivings for his safe arrival, injoined the ministers to pray for him in the churches; and, without the smallest share of power, went through all the ceremonies of royalty, which were, at such a juncture, perfectly ridiculous. After this unimpor­tant parade, he resolved to abandon the enterprize with the same levity with which it had been undertaken, and embarked again for France, together with the Earl of Mar, and some others, in a small ship that lay in the harbour of Montross; and, in five days, arrived at Gravelin. General Gordon, who was left com­mander in chief of the forces, with the assistance of the Earl-marshal, proceeded with them to Aberdeen, where he secured three vessels to sail northward, which took on board the persons who intended to [Page 124] make their escape to the continent. In this manner the rebellion was suppressed; but the fury of the victors did not seem in the least to abate with suc­cess. The law was now put in force, with all its terrors; and the prisons of London were crowded with those deluded wretches whom the ministry shew­ed no disposition to spare. The commons, in their address to the crown, declared they would prosecute in the most vigorous manner the authors of the re­bellion; and their resolutions were as speedy as their measures were vindictive. The Earls Der­wentwater, Nithsdale, Carnwath, and Wintown; the Lords Widrington, Kenmuir, and Nairn, were impeached. The Habeas Corpus act was suspended; and the rebel Lords, upon pleading guilty, received sentence of death. Nothing could soften the Privy Council; the house of Lords even presented an ad­dress to the throne for mercy, but without effect. Orders were dispatched for executing the Earls of Derwentwater and Nithsdale, and the viscount Ken­muir, immediately; the others were respited for three weeks longer. Nithsdale, however, escaped in wo­man's cloaths, which were brought him by his mo­ther, the night before his intended execution. Der­wentwater and Kenmuir were brought to the scaf­fold on Tower-hill, at the hour appointed. Both underwent their sentence with calmness and intrepi­dity, pitied by all, seemingly less moved themselves than the spectators.

An act of parliament was also made for trying the private prisoners in London, and not in Lancashire, where they were taken in arms; which proceeding was, in some measure, an alteration of the ancient constitution of the kingdom; when Foster, Mackin­tosh, and several others were found guilty. Foster, however, escaped from Newgate, and reached the continent in safety; and some time after also Mack­intosh, with some others, forced their way, having [Page 125] mastered the keeper and turnkey, and disarmed the centinel. Four or five were hanged, drawn, and quartered; among whom was William Paul, a cler­gyman, who professed himself a true and sincere member of the Church of England; but not of that schismatical church whose Bishops had abandoned their King. Such was the end of a rebellion, pro­bably first inspired by the rigour of the new Whig ministry and parliament. In running through the vicissitudes of human transactions, we too often find both sides culpable; and so it was in this case. The royal party acted under the influences of partiality, rigour, and prejudice, gratified private animosity under the mask of public justice; and, in their pretended love of justice, forgot humanity. On the other hand, the pretender's party aimed not only at subverting the government, but the religion of the kingdom; bred a Papist himself, he confided only in counsellors of his own persuasion; and most of those who ad­hered to his cause were men of indifferent morals, or bigotted principles. Clemency, however, in the government, at that time, would probably have ex­tinguished all the factious spirit which has hitherto disturbed the peace of this country; for it has ever been the character of the English, that they are more easily led than driven to loyalty.

I am, &c.

LETTER XV.

IN a government, so very complicated as that of England, it must necessarily change from itself, in a revolution of even a few years, as some of its weaker branches acquire strength, or its stronger de­cline. At this period, the rich and noble seemed to possess a greater share of power than they had done for some ages preceding; the house of commons be­came [Page 126] each day a stronger body, at once more inde­pendent on the crown and the people. It was now seen that the rich could at any time buy their elec­tion; and that while their laws governed the poor, they might be enabled to govern the law. The re­bellion was now extinguished; and the severities which justice had inflicted, excited the discontent of many, whose humane passions were awakened as their fears began to subside. This served as a pre­text for continuing the parliament, and repealing the act by which they were to be dissolved at the expiration of every third year. An act of this na­ture, by which a parliament thus extended their own power, was thought, by many, the ready means of undermining the constitution; for if they could with impunity extend their continuance for seven years, which was the time proposed, they could also for life continue their power; but this, it was observed, was utterly incompatible with the spirit of legisla­tion. The bill, however, passed both houses; all objections to it were considered as disaffection; and, in a short time, it received the royal sanction. The people might murmur at this encroachment; but it was now too late for redress.

Domestic concerns being thus adjusted, the King began to turn his thoughts to his Hanoverian dominions, and determined upon a voyage to the continent. Nor was he without his fears for his dominions there, as Charles XII, of Sweden, pro­fessed the highest displeasure at his having entered into a confederacy against him in his absence. Having therefore passed through Holland to Han­over, in order to secure his German territories, he entered into a treaty with the Dutch and the Regent of France, by which they promised mutually to assist each other, in case of invasion; but the death of the Swedish Monarch, who was killed by a cannon­ball at the siege of Frederickstadt, soon put an [Page 127] end to his disquietudes from that quarter. However, his Majesty, to secure himself as far as alliances could add to his safety, entered into various negotiations with the different powers of Europe; some were brought to accede by money, others by promises. Treaties of this kind seldom give any real security; they may be considered as mere political playthings; they amuse for a while, and then are thrown neglect­ed by, never more to be heard of, as nothing but its own internal strength or situation can guard a coun­try from insult.

Among other treaties concluded with such inten­tions, was that called the Quadruple Alliance. It was agreed upon between the Emperor, France, England, and Holland, that the Emperor should renounce all pretensions to the crown of Spain, and exchange Sardinia for Sicily with the Duke of Savoy. That the succession to the Duchies of Tuscany, Parma, and Placentia, should be settled on the Queen of Spain's eldest son, in case the present possessors should die without male issue. This treaty was by no means favourable to the interests of England, as it inter­rupted the commerce with Spain; and, as it de­stroyed the balance of power in Italy, by throw­ing too much into the hands of Austria. How­ever, England sitted out a strong squadron in or­der to bring Spain to terms, if that kingdom should insist upon its rights in Italy. The war between the Emperor and King of Spain was actually begun in that country; and the mediation of the King of England was rejected, as partial and unjust. It was therefore resolved by the court of London to sup­port its negotiations with the strongest reasons; namely, those of war. Sir George Byng sailed to Naples with twenty-two ships of the line, where he was received as a deliverer, that city having been under the utmost terrors of an invasion from Spain. [Page 128] Here the English admiral received intelligence, that the Spanish army, amounting to thirty thousand men, had landed in Sicily; wherefore he immediately de­termined to sail thither, fully resolved to pursue the Spanish fleet. Upon doubling Cape Faro, he per­ceived two small Spanish vessels, and pursuing them closely they led him to their main fleet, which, be­fore noon, he perceived in line of battle, amounting, in all, to twenty-seven sail. At sight of the English fleet, the Spanish fleet, though superior in numbers, attempted to sail away, as the English had, for some time, acquired such expertness in naval affairs, that no other nation would venture to face them, ex­cept with manifest advantage on their side. The Spaniards seemed distracted in their councils, and acted with extreme confusion; they made a running fight; but notwithstanding what they could do, all but three were taken. The admiral, during this en­gagement, acted with equal prudence and resolution; and the King wrote him a letter with his own hand, approving his conduct. This victory necessarily pro­duced the resentment and complaints of the Spanish ministers at all the courts of Europe, which induced England to declare war with Spain; and the Regent of France joined England in a similar declaration. The Duke of Ormond now, once more, hoped, by the assistance of Cardinal Alberoni, the Spanish mini­ster, to restore the pretender in England. He accord­ingly set sail with some troops, and proceeded as far as Cape Finisterre, where his fleet was dispersed, and disabled by a violent storm, which entirely frustrated the armament; and, from this time, the pretender seemed to lose all hopes of being received in Eng­land. This blow of fortune, together with the bad success of the Spanish arms in Sicily and elsewhere, once more induced them to wish for peace; and the King of Spain was at last contented to sign the qua­druple alliance.

[Page 129] King George having thus, with equal vigour and deliberation, surmounted all the obstacles he met with in his way to the throne, and used every precaution that sagacity could suggest, for securing himself in it, again returned to England, where the addresses from both houses were as loyal as he could expect. From addressing they turned to an object of the greatest im­portance; namely, that of securing the dependency of the Irish parliament upon that of Great Britain. Maurice Annesly had appealed to the house of Peers in England, from a decree of the house of Peers in Ireland; which was reversed. The British Peers ordered the Barons of the Exchequer in Ireland, to put Mr. Annesly in possession of the lands he had lost by the decree in that kingdom. The Barons obeyed this order, and the Irish house of Peers passed a vote against them, as having attempted to diminish the just privileges of the parliament of Ireland; and, at the same time, ordered the Barons to be taken under the custody of the Black Rod. On the other hand, the house of Lords in England resolved, that the Barons of the Exchequer in Ireland had acted with courage and fidelity; and addressed the King to signify his approbation of their conduct, by some marks of his favour. To complete their intention, a bill was prepared, by which the Irish house of Lords was deprived of all rights of final jurisdiction. This was opposed in both houses. In the lower house Mr. Pitt asserted, that it would only increase the power of the English Peers, who already had too much. Mr. Hungerford demonstrated that the Irish Lords had always exerted their power of finally deciding causes. The Duke of Leeds produced fifteen reasons against the bill; but, notwithstanding all opposition, it was carried by a great majority, and received the royal assent. The kingdom of Ireland was not, at that time, so well acquainted with the nature of [...]iberty, and its own constitution, as it is at present. [Page 130] Their house of Lords might then consist mostly of men bred up in luxury and ignorance; neither spi­rited enough to make opposition, nor skilful enough to conduct it.

But this blow, which the Irish felt severely, was not so great as that which England now began to suffer from that spirit of avarice and chicanery which had infected almost all ranks of people. In the year 1720, John Law, a Scotchman, had erected a com­pany in France under the name of the Missisippi; which, at first, promised the deluded people immense wealth, but too soon appeared an imposture, and left the greatest part of that nation in ruin and distress. The year following the people of England were de­ceived by just such another project, which is remem­bered by all by the name of the South-Sea scheme; and, to this day, felt by thousands. To explain this as concisely as possible, it is to be observed, that ever since the revolution, the government, not hav­ing sufficient supplies granted by parliament; or, what was granted requiring time to be collected, they were obliged to borrow money from several different companies of merchants; and, among the rest, from that company which traded to the South-Sea. In the year 1716, they were indebted to this company about nine millions and an half of money, for which they granted annually at the rate of six per cent. in­terest. As this company was not the only one, to which the government was debtor, and paid such large interest yearly, Sir Robert Walpole conceived a design of lessening these national debts, by giving the several companies an alternative, either of ac­cepting a lower interest; namely, five per cent. for their money, or of being paid the principal. The different companies chose rather to accept of the diminished interest than their capital; and the South-Sea company accordingly having made up their debt to the government ten millions, instead of six hun­dred thousand pounds which they usually received [Page 131] as interest, were satisfied with five hundred thou­sand. In the same manner the governors and com­pany of the Bank, and other companies, were con­tented to receive a diminished annuity for their se­veral loans, all which greatly lessened the debts of the nation. It was in this situation of things that Sir John Blount, who had been bred a scrivener, and was possessed of all the cunning and plausibility re­quisite for such an undertaking, proposed to the mi­nistry, in the name of the South-Sea company, to lessen the national debt still further, by permitting the South-Sea company to buy up all the debts of the different companies, and thus to become the principal creditor of the state. The terms offered the govern­ment were extremely advantageous. The South-Sea company was to redeem the debts of the nation out of the hands of the private proprietors, who were creditors to the government, upon whatever terms they could agree on; and, for the interest of this money, which they had thus redeemed, and taken into their own hands, they should be allowed for six years five per cent. and then the interest should be reduced to four per cent. and be redeemable by par­liament. For these purposes a bill passed both houses; and as the directors of the South-Sea company could not of themselves alone be supposed to be possessed of money sufficient to buy up these debts of the go­vernment, they were impowered to raise it by open­ing a subscription, and granting annuities to such proprietors as should think proper to exchange their creditors; namely, the Crown for the South-Sea company, with the advantages that might be made by their industry. The superior advantages with which the proprietors were flattered, by thus ex­changing their property in the funds for South-Sea stock were a chimerical prospect of having their money [...]urned to great advantage, by a commerce to the [...]outhern parts of America, where it was reported, [Page 132] that the English were to have some new settlements granted them by the King of Spain. The directors books therefore were no sooner opened for the first subscription, but crowds came to make the exchange; the delusion spread; subscriptions in a few days sold for double the price they had been bought for. The scheme succeeded, and the whole nation was infected with a spirit of avaricious enterprize. The infatu­ation prevailed; the stock increased to a surprising degree; but after a few months, the people awak­ed from their delirium; they sound that all the advantages to be expected were merely imaginary; and an infinite number of families were involved in ruin. Many of the directors whose arts had raised these vain expectations, had amassed surprising for­tunes: it was, however, one consolation to the na­tion, to find the parliament stripping them of their ill-acquired wealth; and orders were given to re­move all directors of the South Sea company from their seats in the house of commons, or the places they possessed under the government. The delin­quents being punished by a forfeiture of their estates, the parliament next converted its at [...]ention toward redressing the sufferers. Several useful and just re­solutions were taken, and a bill was speedily prepared towards repairing the mischiefs. Of the profits ari­sing from the South-Sea scheme, the sum of seven millions was granted to the ancient proprietors; se­veral additions also were made to their dividends out of what was possessed by the company in their own right, the remaining capital stock also was divided among all the proprietors at the rate of thirty-three pounds per cent. In the mean time petitions from all parts of the kingdom were presented to the house, demanding justice; and the whole nation seemed ex­asperated to the highest degree. During these trans­actions, the King, with serenity and wisdom presided at the helm, influenced his parliament to pursue equitable [Page 133] measures, and, by his councils, endeavoured to re­store the credit of the nation.

The discontents occasioned by these public cala­mities, once more gave the disaffected party hopes of rising. But, in all their councils they were weak, divided, and wavering. Their present designs there­fore could not escape the vigilance of the King, who had emissaries in every court, and who had made, by his alliances, every potentate a friend to his cause. He was therefore informed, by the Duke of Orleans, Regent of France, of a new conspiracy raised against him by several persons of distinction, which post­poned his intended journey to Hanover. Among those against whom the most positive evidence was obtained, was Mr. Christopher Layer, a young gen­tleman of the Middle Temple. He was convicted of having inlisted men for the pretender's service, and received sentence of death; which he under­went, after having been often examined, and having strenuously refused, to the last, to discover his accom­plices. He was the only person who suffered death upon this occasion; but several noblemen of high distinction were made prisoners upon suspicion. The Duke of Norfolk, the Bishop of Rochester, the Lord Orrery, and the Lord North and Grey were of this number. Of these all but the Bishop of Rochester c [...]me off without punishment, the circumstances not being sufficient against them for conviction. A bill was brought into the house of commons against him, although a Peer; and though it met with some op­position, yet it was resolved by a great majority, that he should be deprived of his office and benefice, and banished the kingdom for ever. The Bishop made no defence in the lower house, reserving all his power to be exerted in the house of Lords. In that assembly he had many friends; his eloquence, po­liteness, and ingenuity had procured him many; and his cause being heard, a long and warm debate was [Page 134] the consequence. As there was little against him but intercepted letters, which were written in cypher, the Earl Pawlet insisted on the danger and injustice of departing, in such cases, from the fixed rules of evidence. The Duke of Wharton having summed up the depositions, and shewn the insufficiency of them, concluded with saying, That let the conse­quences be what they would, he hoped the lustre of that house would be never tarnished, by condemning a man without evidence. The Lord Bathurst spoke also against the bill, observing, That if such extra­ordinary proceedings were countenanced, he saw no­thing remaining for him and others to do, but to re­tire to their country-houses, and there, if possible, quietly enjoy their estates within their own families, since the least correspondence, or intercepted letter, might be made criminal. Then turning to the Bi­shops, he said he could hardly account for the inve­terate hatred and malice some persons bore the in­genious Bishop of Rochester, unless it was, that they were infatuated like the wild Americans, who sond­ly believe they inherit, not only the spoils, but even the abilities of any man they kill. The Earl of Strafford spoke on the same side; as also Lord Tre­vor, who observed, That if men were, in this un­precedented manner, proceeded against, without le­gal proof, in a short time the minister's favour would be the subject's only protection; but that for him­self, no apprehension of what he might suffer, would deter him from doing his duty. He was answered by Lord Seafield, who endeavoured to shew, that the evidence which had been produced before them was sufficient to convince any reasonable man; and, in this, he was supported by the Duke of Argyle and Lord Lechmere. To these Lord Cowper replied, That the strongest argument urged in behalf of the bill, was necessity; but, for his part, he could see nothing that could justify such unprecedented, and [Page 135] such dangerous proceedings. The other party, how­ever, said little in answer; perhaps already sensible of a majority in their favour. The bill was passed against the Bishops, and several Lords entered their protest. Among the members of the house of com­mons, who had exerted themselves most strenuously in the Bishop's favour, was Doctor Friend, the cele­brated physician; and he was now taken into cus­tody on suspicion of treasonable practices. He was soon after, however, admitted to bail; his friend Doctor Mead becoming his security. In two days after the Bishop of Rochester embarked for banish­ment, accompanied with his daughter; and, on the same day that he landed at Calais, the famous Lord Bolingbroke arrived there, in his return to England, having obtained his Majesty's pardon. Upon which the Bishop, smiling, said, His Lordship and I are ex­changed. In this manner the Bishop continued in ex­ile and poverty till he died; though it may not be improper to observe, that Doctor Sacheverel left him, by will, five hundred pounds.

Few transactions of importance happened during the remainder of this reign; the ministry were em­ployed in making various and expensive negotiations, alliances, and treaties; covenants that are made with­out faith, and only observed from motives of interest or fear. The parliament made also some efforts to cheek the progress of vice and immorality, which now began to be diffused through every rank of life; luxury and profligacy had increased to a surprising degrce; nor were there any transactions to fill the page of history, except the mercenary schemes of vile projectors, or the tasteless profusion of new-made opulence. The treaties lately concluded with Spain were again broken, perhaps by every party; admiral Hosier was sent to intercept the Spanish galleons from America; of which the Spaniards being ap­prized, remanded back their treasure; and the great­est [Page 136] part of the English fleet, sent on this errand, was rendered, by the worms, entirely unfit for service; and the men were cut off by the unhealthy climate and long voyage. To retaliate this, the Spaniards undertook the siege of Gibraltar, and with similar success. New treaties were set on foot; France of­fered its mediation; and such a reconciliation as treaties could procure was the consequence.

The King had not now, for two years, visited his German dominions; and therefore soon after the breaking up of parliament he prepared for a journey to Hanover. Accordingly, having appointed an ad­ministration in his absence, he embarked for Hol­land; lay, upon his landing, at the little town of Vert; next day proceeded on his journey; and, in two days more, between ten and eleven at night, ar­rived at Delden, in all appearance in perfect health. He supped there very heartily, and eat an orange; and continued his progress early the next morning. Between eight and nine he ordered the coach to stop, and, it being perceived that one of his hands lay motionless, monsieur Fabrice, who had formerly been the servant of the King of Sweden, and now at­tended King George, chafed it between his. As this had no effect, the surgeon was called, who fol­lowed on horseback, and also rubbed it with spi­rits; soon after the King's tongue began to swell, and he had just force enough to bid them hasten to Osnaburgh; and, falling into Fabrice's arms, quite insensible, never recovered, but expired about eleven o'clock the next morning. He died on Sunday the eleventh of June, in the sixty-eighth year of his age, and in the thirteenth of his reign. Whatever was good or great in the reign of George I, ought to be attributed wholly to himself; and whenever he deviated, it might justly be imputed to a ministry al­ways partial, and often corrupt. He was almost ever [...]nded with good fortune, which was partly owing [Page 137] to prudence, and more to assiduity. In short, his successes are the strongest instance of how much may be atchieved by moderate abilities, exerted with ap­plication and uniformity.

I am, &c.

LETTER XVI.

I Have not hitherto said any thing of the literature of the present period, having resolved to refer it to a separate letter, in which we may have a more perspicu­ous view of it, than if blended with the ordinary oc­currences of the state. Though learning had never received fewer encouragements than in the present reign, yet it never flourished more. That spirit of philosophy which had been excited in former ages, still continued to operate with the greatest success, and produced the greatest men in every profession. Among the divines, Atterbury and Clarke distinguished themselves. As a preacher, Atterbury united all the graces of style with all the elegance of a just deli­very; he was natural, polite, spirited; and his ser­mons may be ranked among the first of this period. Clarke, on the other hand, despising the graces of eloquence, only sought after conviction, with rigorous though phlegmatic exactness, and brought moral truths almost to mathematical precision. Yet nei­ther he, Cudworth, nor any other divine, did such service to the reasoning world, as the great Mr. John Locke, who may be justly said to have reformed all our modes of thinking in metaphysical inquiry. Though the jargon of schools had been before him arraigned, yet several of their errors had still subsist­ed, and were regarded as true. Locke therefore set [...]imself to overturn their systems, and refute their [...]bsurdities; these he effectually accomplished; for [...]hich reason his book, which, when published, was [Page 138] of infinite service; it may be found less useful at pre­sent, when the doctrines it was calculated to refute, are no longer subsisting.

Among the moral writers of this period, the Earl of Shaftesbury is not to be passed over, whose ele­gance, in some measure, recompenses for his want of solidity. The opinions of all latter writers upon moral subjects, are only derived from the ancients [...] Morals are a subject on which the industry of men has been exercised in every age; and an infinite num­ber of systems have been the result. That of Shaftes­bury, in which he establishes a natural sense of moral beauty, was originally professed by Plato, and only adorned by the English philosopher. Thi [...] seemed to be the age of speculation. Berkeley, afterwards Bishop of Cloyne in Ireland, surpassed al [...] his cotemporaries in subtlety of disquisition; but th [...] mere efforts of reason, which are exerted rather t [...] raise doubt than procure certainty, will never mee [...] with much favour from so vain a being as man [...] Lord Bolingbroke had also some reputation for metaphysical inquiry; his friends extolled his sagacity on that head; and the public were willing enough t [...] acquiesce in their opinion; his fame therefore migh [...] have continued to rise; or, at least, would have never sunk, if he had never published. His work [...] have appeared, and the public are no longer in thei [...] former sentiments. In mathematics and natural philosophy, the vein opened by Newton, was prosecute [...] with success; Doctor Halley illustrated the theory [...] the tides, and increased the catalogue of the stars [...] while Gregory reduced astronomy to one comprehensive and regular system. Doctor Friend, in medicine, produced some ingenious theories, which, [...] they did not improve the art, at least shewed his abilities and learning in his profession. Doctor Mea [...] was equally elegant, and more successful; to him [...] owing the useful improvement of tapping in th [...] [Page 139] dropsy, at once by means of a swathe. But, of all the other arts, poetry in this age was carried to the greatest perfection. The language, for some ages, had been improving, but now it seemed entirely di­vested of its roughness and barbarity. Among the poets of this period we may place John Philips, au­thor of several poems, but of none more admired than that humourous one, intitled, The splendid Shil­ling; he lived in obscurity, and died just above want. William Congreve deserves also particular notice; his comedies, some of which were but cooly received upon their first appearance, seemed to mend upon re­petition; and he is, at present, justly allowed the foremost in that species of dramatic poesy. His wit is ever just and brilliant; his sentiments new and lively; and his elegance equal to his regularity. Next him Vanburgh is placed, whose humour seems more natural, and characters more new; but he owes too many obligations to the French, entirely to pass for an original; and his total disregard to decency, in a great measure, impairs his merit. Farquhar is still more lively, and, perhaps, more entertaining than either; his pieces still continue the favourite performances of the stage, and bear frequent repe­tition without satiety; but he often mistakes pertness for wit, and seldom strikes his characters with pro­per force or originality. However, he died very young; and it is remarkable, that he continued to improve as he grew older; his last play, intitled The Beau Stratagem, being the best of his productions. Addison, both as a poet and prose writer, deserves [...]he highest regard and imitation. His Campaign, and Letter to Lord Halifax from Italy, are master­pieces in the former, and his Essays published in the Spectator are inimitable specimens of the latter. Whatever he treated of was handled with elegance [...]nd precision; and that virtue which was taught in [...]is writings, was enforced by his example. Steele [Page 140] was Addison's friend and admirer; his comedies ar [...] perfectly polite, chaste, and genteel; nor were hi [...] other works contemptible; he wrote on severa [...] subjects, and yet it is amazing, in the multi­plicity of his pursuits, how he found leisure fo [...] the discussion of any. Ever persecuted by credi­tors, whom his profuseness drew upon him, or pursuing impracticable schemes, suggested by ill-ground­ed ambition. Dean Swift was the professed antago­nist of both Addison and him. He perceived that there was a spirit of romance mixed with all the works of the poets who preceded him; or, in other words, that they had drawn nature on the most pleas­ing side. There still therefore was a place left for him, who, careless of censure, should describe it just as it was, with all its deformities; he therefore owes much of his fame, not so much to the greatness of his genius, as to the boldness of it. He was dry, sarcastic, and severe; and suited his style exactly to the turn of his thought, being concise and nervous. In this period also flourished many of subordinate fame. Prior was the first who adopted the French elegant easy manner of telling a story; but if what he has borrowed from that nation be taken from him, scarce any thing will be left upon which he can lay claim to applause in poetry. Rowe was only out­done by Shakespear and Otway as a tragic writer; he has fewer absurdities than either; and is, perhaps, as pathetic as they; but his flights are not so bold, nor his characters so strongly marked. Perhaps his coming later than the rest may have contributed to lessen the esteem he deserves. Garth had success as a poet; and, for a time, his fame was even greater than his desert. In his principal work, the Dispen­sary, his versification is negligent; and his plot is now become tedious; but whatever he may lose as a poet, [...]t would be improper to rob him of the merit he de­serves for having written the prose dedication, and [Page 141] preface, to the poem already mentioned; in which he has shewn the truest wit, with the most refined ele­gance. Parnel, though he has written but one poem, namely, the Hermit, yet has found a place among the English first-rate poets. Gay, likewise, by his Fables and Pastorals, has acquired an equal reputa­tion. But of all who have added to the stock of English poetry, Pope, perhaps, deserves the first place. On him foreigners look as one of the most successful writers of his time; his versification is the most harmonious, and his correctness the most re­markable of all our poets. A noted cotemporary of his own, calls the English the finest writers on mo­ral topics, and Pope the noblest moral writer of all the English. Mr. Pope has somewhere named himself the last English Muse; and, indeed, since his time, we have seen scarce any production that can justly lay claim to immortality; he carried the language to its highest perfection; and those who have attempted still far­ther to improve it, instead of ornament, have only caught finery.

Such was the learning of this period; it flourished without encouragement, and the English taste seemed to diffuse itself over all Europe. The French tra­gedies began to be written after the model of ours; our philosophy was adopted by all who pretended to reason for themselves. At present, however, when the learned of Europe are turned to the English writers for instruction, all spirit of learning has ceased amongst us. So little has been got by literature for more than an age, that none chuse to turn to it for preferment. Church preferments, which were once given as the rewards of learning, have, for some time, deviated to the intriguing, venal, and base. All desire of novelty, in thinking, is suppressed amongst us; and our scholars, more pleased with security and ease than honour, cooly follow the reasonings of their predecessors, and walk round the circle of former dis­covery.

LETTER XVII.

UPON the death of George I, his son George II [...] ascended the throne, of inferior abilities to th [...] late King; and consequently still more strongly attached to his dominions on the continent. The various subsidies that had been in the last reign granted, to maintain foreign connexions, were still kept u [...] in this and the late system of politics, underwent n [...] sort of alteration. The rights and privileges of th [...] throne of England were, in general, committed t [...] the minister's care; the royal concern being chief [...] fixed upon balancing the German powers, and gaining an ascendancy for the Elector of Hanover i [...] the Empire. The ministry was, at first, divided between Lord Townshend, a man of extensive knowledge; the Earl of Chesterfield, the only man of genius employed under this government; and Sir Robert Walpole, who soon after engrossed the greate share of the administration to himself.

Sir Robert Walpole, who is to make the principa [...] figure in the present reign, had, from low beginnings, raised himself to the head of the treasury [...] Strongly attached to the house of Hanover, and serving it at times, when it wanted his assistance, he sti [...] maintained the prejudices with which he set out [...] and, unaware of the alteration of sentiments in th [...] nation, still attempted to govern by party. He, probably, like every other minister, began by endeavou [...] ing to serve his country; but, meeting with stron [...] opposition, his succeeding endeavours were rath [...] employed in maintaining his post, than of being serviceable in it. The declining prerogative of th [...] crown might have been an early object of his attention; but, in the sequel, those very measures whic [...] he took to increase it, proved to be the most effec [...] tual means of undermining it. As latterly all h [...] [Page 143] aims were turned only to serve himself, and his friends, he undertook to make a majority in the house of com­mons, by bribing the members; and, what was still worse, avowed the corruption. As all spirit of in­tegrity was now laughed out of the kingdom; and as the people were held to duty by no motives of religious obedience to the throne, patriotism was ri­diculed, and venality practised without shame. As such a disposition of things naturally produced oppo­sition, Sir Robert was possessed of a most phlegmatic insensibility to bear reproach, and a calm dispassionate way of reasoning upon such topics as he desired to enforce. His discourse was fluent without elo­quence; and his reasons convincing, without any share of elevation.

The house of commons, which, in the preceding reign, had been distinguished into Whigs and Jaco­bites, now underwent another change, and was again divided into the Court and Country party. The Court party were for favouring all the schemes of the ministry, and applauding all the measures of the crown. They regarded foreign alliances as condu­cive to internal security; and paid the troops of other countries for their promises of future assistance. Of these Sir Robert was the leader; and such as he could not convince by his eloquence, he undertook to buy over by places and pensions. The other side. who called themselves the Country party, were en­tirely averse to continental connexions; they com­plained that immense sums were lavished on subsi­lies, which could never be useful; and that alliances were bought with money, which should be only re­warded by a reciprocation of good intentions. These [...]ooked upon the frequent journies of the King to his Electoral dominions with a jealous eye, and some­ [...]mes hinted at the alienation of the royal affections [...]om England. Most of these had been strong as­ [...]rtors of the Protestant succession; and, not fearing [Page 144] the reproach of Jacobitism, they spoke with stil [...] greater boldness. As the Court party generally threa­tened the house of commons with imaginary danger to the state; so these of the Country usually de claimed against the incroachments of the prerogative. The threats of neither were founded i [...] truth; the kingdom was in no danger from abroad [...] nor was internal liberty in the least infringed by th [...] crown. On the contrary, those who viewed the stat [...] with an unprejudiced eye, were of opinion that th [...] prerogatives of the crown were the only part of th [...] constitution that was growing every day weaker; tha [...] while the King's thoughts were turned to foreig [...] concerns, the ministry were unmindful of his authority at home; and that every day the government wa [...] making hasty steps to an aristocracy, the worst of a [...] governments. As Walpole headed the Court party [...] so the leaders of the opposite side were Mr. Willia [...] Pitt, Mr. Shippen, Sir William Wyndham, and M [...] Hungerford.

The great objects of controversy during this reig [...] were the national debt, and the number of forces [...] be kept in pay. The government, at the accessio [...] of the present Monarch, owed more than thirty mi [...] lions of money; and, though it was a time of profound peace, yet this sum was continually found [...] increase. To pay off this, the ministry propos [...] many projects, and put some into execution; bu [...] what could be expected from a set of men who ma [...] the public wealth only subservient to private interes [...] and who grew powerful on the wrecks of their cou [...] try? Demands for new supplies were made eve [...] session of parliament, either for the purposes of s [...] curing friends upon the continent, of guarding [...] internal polity, or for enabling the ministry to a [...] vigorously in conjunction with their allies abroa [...] These were as regularly opposed as made; the spea [...] ers of the Country party ever insisted that the Engli [...] [Page 145] had no business to embroil themselves with the affairs of the continent; that expences were incurred with­out prudence or necessity; and that the increase of the national debt, by multiplying taxes, would, at length, become intolerable to the people. What­ever reason there might be in such arguments, they were notwithstanding constantly over-ruled; and every demand granted with pleasure and profusion.

All these treaties and alliances, however, in which the kingdom had been lately involved, seemed no­way productive of the general tranquility expected from them. The Spaniards, who had never been thoroughly reconciled, still continued their depreda­tions, and plundered the English merchants upon the southern coasts of America, as if they had been pi­rates. This was the reign of negotiations; and, from these alone, the ministry promised themselves and the nation redress. Still, however, the enemy went on to insult and seize, regardless of our vain ex-postulations. The British merchants complained, by petition, of the losses sustained by the Spaniards; and the house of commons deliberated upon this subject. They examined the evidence, and present­ed an address to his Majesty. He promised them all possible satisfaction, and negotiations were begun as formerly. And a new treaty was signed at Vienna be­tween the Emperor and the Kings of Great Britain and Spain, tending to confirm the former. Though such transactions did not give the security that was [...]xpected from them, yet they, in some measure, put off the troubles of Europe for a time. An interval of [...]eace succeeded, in which scarce any events hap­ [...]ened that deserve the remembrance of an historian; [...]ch intervals are, however, the periods of happiness [...] a people; for history is too often but the register [...]f human calamities. By this treaty at Vienna the [...]ing of England conceived hopes, that the peace of [...]urope was established upon the most lasting founda­tion. [Page 146] Don Carlos, upon the death of the Duke o [...] Parma, was, by the assistance of an English fleet, pu [...] in peaceable possession of Parma and Placentia. Six thousand Spaniards were quietly admitted, and quar­tered in the Duchy of Tuscany, to secure for him the reversion of that Dukedom. Thus we see Eu­rope, in some measure, resembling a republic, put­ting Monarchs into new kingdoms, and depriving others of their succession by an universal concur­rence. But this amicable disposition among the great powers can never continue long; and the republic of Europe will be but an empty name, until there be some controlling power set up by universal consent, to enforce obedience to the law of nations.

During this interval of profound peace, nothing remarkable happened, except the constant disputa­tions in the house of commons, where the contests between the Court and Country party were carried on with the greatest acrimony; the speeches, on either side, being dictated less by reason than resent­ment. A calm uninterested reader is now surprized at the heat with which many subjects of little im­portance in themselves, were discussed at that time; he now smiles at those denunciations of ruin with which their orations are replete. The truth is, the liberty of a nation is better supported by such an op­position, than by what is said in the opposition.

In times of profound tranquility the slightest oc­currences become objects of universal attention. A society of men, intitled, The charitable Corporation, excited the indignation of the public. Their pro­fessed intention was, to lend money at legal interest to the poor, upon small pledges; and to persons of better rank, upon proper security. Their capital was at first limited to thirty thousand pounds; but they afterwards increased it to six hundred thousand. This money was granted in by subscription; and the care of conducting the capital was intrusted to a pro [...] [Page 147] number of directors. This company, having con­tinued for more than twenty years, the cashier, George Robinson, and the warehouse-keeper of the company, disappeared in one day. Five hun­dred thousand pounds of the capital appeared to be sunk, and embezzled by the directors, in a manner the proprietors could not account for. They there­fore petitioned the house, representing the manner in which they had been defrauded of such vasts sums of mo­ney, and the distress to which many were reduced to, in consequence of such imposition. The petition was received, and a secret committee appointed to inquire into the grievance. They soon discovered a most iniquitous scene of fraud, which had been carried on by Thompson and Robinson, in concert with some of the directors, for embezzling the capital, and cheating the proprietors. Many persons of rank and quality were concerned in this infamous conspiracy; some of the first characters in the nation did not escape without censure. The house of commons declared their resentment, and expelled one or two of their members; but the sufferers met with scarce any re­dress. Nor can I mention such a circumstance with­out reflecting on that spirit of rapacity and avarice which infected every degree of people. An ill ex­ample in the governing part of a country ever diffuses itself downward; and, while the ministry do not blush at detection, the people of every rank will not fear guilt. About this time not less than five members of parliament were expelled for the most sordid acts of knavery; Sir Robert Sutton, Sir Archibald Grant, and George Robinson, for their [...]rauds in the management of the Charitable Corpora­ [...]ion scheme; Dennis Bond, Esquire; and Serjeant Burch, for a fraudulent sale of the late Earl of Der­wentwater's forfeited estates. Luxury had produced [...]rodigality, the sure parent of every meanness. It was even asserted in the house of Lords, that not [Page 148] one shilling of the forfeited estates was ever applied to the service of the public; but became the reward of avarice and venality.

Another occurrence of a more private nature, about this time, excited public compassion, not without a degree of horror: Richard Smith, a book­binder, and his wife, had long lived together, and struggled with those wants, which, notwithstanding the profusion of the rich at this time, oppressed the poor. Their mutual tenderness for each other, was the only comfort they had in their distresses, which distresses were increased by having a child, which they knew not how to maintain. At length, they took the desperate resolution of dying by their own hands; the child's throat was cut, and the husband and wife were found hanging in their bed-chamber. They left a letter behind, containing the reasons which in­duced them to this act of desperation; they declar­ed, that they could no longer support a life of such complicated wretchedness; and thought it tender­ness to take their child with them, from a world where they themselves had found no compassion. Suicide, in many instances, is ascribed to phrenzy: we have here an instance of self-murder, concerted with composure, and borrowing the aids of reason for its vindication.

I am, &c.

LETTER XVIII.

THE History of England has little, during this interval, to excite curiosity. The debates in parliament grew every day more obstinate, as every subject happened to come round in voting the an­nual supplies. But as the subjects were mostly the same, so also were the arguments. There was one, [Page 149] however, of a different nature from those in the usual course of business, which was laboured for stre­nously by the ministry, and as warmly opposed by their antagonists, namely, the excise bill, which Sir Robert Walpole introduced into the house, by first declaiming against the frauds practised by the factors in London, who were employed by the American planters in selling their tobacco. To prevent these frauds he proposed, instead of having the customs levied in the usual manner upon tobacco, that what was imported should be lodged in warehouses ap­pointed for that purpose by the officers of the crown; from thence to be sold, after paying the duty of four-pence per pound, when the proprietor found a market for it. This proposal raised a violent ferment, not less in the house than without doors. Those who opposed the scheme, asserted, that this scheme would expose the factors to such hardships, that they would not be able to continue the trade, nor would it prevent the frauds complained of. They asserted, that it would produce an additional swarm of excise­officers and warehouse-keepers, which would at once tender the ministry formidable, and the people de­pendant. Arguments, however, were not what the ministry most dreaded; for the people had been raised into such a ferment, that all the avenues to the house were crowded with complaining multitudes; and Sir Robert Walpole began even to fear for his life. The ministry carried the proposal in the house; but, observ­ing the tumult of the people, they thought fit to drop the design. The miscarriage of the bill was celebrated with public rejoicings in London and Westminster; and the minister was burned in effigy by the popu­lace.

This success, in the members of the opposition, encouraged them to go on to a proposal for repeal­ing an act made in the last reign, by which the house of commons was to be septennial. They proposed [Page 150] that parliaments should again be made triennial, a [...] had been settled at the revolution. In the course o [...] this debate, in which they were opposed, as usual, by the ministry, they reflected, with great severity, o [...] the measures of the late reign. They asserted, tha [...] the septennial act was an incroachment on the right [...] of the people; that during the continuance of tha [...] parliament, several severe laws had been enacted [...] that by one of these a man might be removed, and tried in any place where the jury might be favour­able to the crown, and where the prisoners witnesses could not, or dare not, to come. That, by another, a justice of the peace was impowered to put the best subjects to immediate death only, after reading a pro­clamation against riots. The South-Sea scheme, they said, was established by an act of a septennial parliament; and the excise bill had like, under their influence also, to have passed into a law. Sir Wil­liam Wyndham distinguished himself in this debate: Let us suppose, said he, a man without any sense of honour raised to be a chief minister of state. Suppose him possessed of great wealth; the plunder of the nation. Suppose him screened by a corrupt majority of his creatures, and insult­ing over all men of family, sense, and honour, in the na­tion. Let us suppose a venal parliament, and an ignorant King; I hope such a case will never occur; but should such ever happen to be at once united, a short parliament will be the only means of lessening the evil. Notwithstanding these expostulations, the ministry were, as usual, vic­torious, and the motion suppressed by the majo­rity. The Country party now found themselves out-numbered upon every occasion; they had long complained, in vain, that debate was useless, since every member seemed to have listed himself under the banners of party, to which he held without shrinking. Despairing therefore of being able to stem the torrent of corruption, they retired to their seats in the coun­try, [Page 151] and left the ministry an undisputed majority in the house.

The minister being now left without opposition in the house, took this opportunity to render his ri­vals odious or contemptible, by getting several useful laws passed in their absence; while the King labour­ed, with equal assiduity, to adjust the political scale of Europe; and, for this purpose, made several journies to his Electoral dominions. But his assiduity in heal­ing foreign differences did not prevent one of a more domestic nature; for a misunderstanding arose be­tween him and the Prince of Wales; a Prince that was the darling of the people, and who professed his dislike both of the ministry and their venal measures. He had been, a short time before, married to the Princess of Saxegotha; and the Prince's mistaking a message from the King, at a time when the Prin­cess was lying-in, first caused the rupture. It was soon after widened by the vile emissaries of the court, so that his Majesty forbade the Prince his presence; and gave orders that none of his attendants should be admitted to court. A motion, however, was made in the house of commons, for increasing the Prince's settlement, which was but fifty thousand pounds, to an hundred thousand. It was represented that so much had been granted by the late King, to his pre­sent Majesty, when Prince of Wales; and that such a settlement was conformable to the practice of for­mer times, and necessary to the independency of the heir apparent to the English crown. This motion was vigorously opposed by Sir Robert Walpole, as an incroachment on the prerogative, and an officious in­termeddling in the King's family affairs. The sup­porters of the motion observed, that the allowance of fifty thousand pounds was not sufficient to defray the Prince's yearly expences, which, by his Majesty's own regulation, amounted to sixty-three thousand. The motion, however, met the fate of all other anti­ministerial [Page 152] measures, being rejected by the majo­rity.

But whatever imaginary disappointments the people might suffer, there was a blow levelled at the little wit that was left remaining, which has effectually banished all taste from the stage, and from which it has never since recovered. When Walpole entered into power, he resolved to despise that set of under­rate writers, who live by arraigning every ministry, and disseminate scandal and abuse. For a time he prosecuted that intention; but, at last, found it ne­cessary to employ a set of mean hirelings, to answer calumny with calumny. He wanted judgment to distinguish genius; or none possessed of such a gift were mean enough to applaud his measures. From hence he took an implacable aversion to the press, which so severely exposed his corruption, and branded his follies. But the press alone was not the only scourge he had to fear; the theatre joined all its ri­dicule, and he saw himself exposed as the object of scorn, as well as hatred. When license once trans­gresses the rules of decency, it knows no bounds [...] Some of the pieces exhibited at that time were no [...] only severe, but immoral also. This was what th [...] minister held to; he brought in a bill to limit th [...] number of play-houses; to subject all dramatic writ­ings to the inspection of the Lord Chamberlain, whos [...] license was to be obtained before any work could appear. Among those who undertook to oppose thi [...] bill, was the Earl of Chesterfield, who observed tha [...] the laws already in being for keeping the stage withi [...] due bounds, were every way sufficient. If, says he [...] our stage-players at any time exceed those bounds, they ough [...] to be prosecuted, and may be punished. A new law therefore is, in the present instance, unnecessary; and every unnecessary law is dangerous. Wit, my Lords, is the property of those that have it; and it is too often the only property they have. It is unjust therefore to rob a man at a [...] [Page 153] rate of his possessions; but it is cruelty to spoil him, if al­ready poor. If poets and players are to be restrained, let them be restrained like other subjects; let them be tried by their Peers, and let not a Lord Chamberlain be made the sovereign judge of wit. A power lodged in the hands of a single man to determine, without limitation or appeal, is a privilege unknown to our laws, and inconsistent with our constitution. The house applauded his wit and elo­quence; and the question was carried against him.

The discontents occasioned by such proceedings at home, were still more increased by the depredations of the Spaniards. They disputed the right of the English to cut logwood in the Bay of Campeachy in America; a right which had been often acknow­ledged, but never clearly explained, in all former treaties between the two kingdoms. Their Guarda Costas plundered the English merchants with impu­nity; and, upon the least resistance, behaved with insolence, cruelty, and rapine. The subjects of Bri­tain were buried in the mines of Potosi, deprived of all means of conveying their complaints to their protectors, and their vessels confiscated, in defiance of justice. The English court made frequent re­monstrances to that of Madrid, of this outrageous violation of treaties. and they received for answer only promises of inquiry, which produced no refor­mation. Our merchants loudly complained of these outrages; but the minister expected, from negotia­tion, that redress which could only be obtained by arms. He knew that a war would increase the diffi­culties he had to encounter; and he was sensible that those he already encountered required all his art and industry to remove. A war, he was sensible, would require expences which he wished to share in peace. In short, all his measures now were not to serve the state, but to preserve his power. Influenced by these considerations, he industriously endcavoured to avoid a rupture. The fears he discovered only served to [Page 154] increase the enemies insolence and pride. However the complaints of the English merchants were loud enough to reach the house of commons; their let­ters and memorials were produced, and their griev­ances enforced at the bar by council. The house, at length, agreed to an address, to intreat his Majesty to obtain effectual relief, and to convince Spain that its indignities would be no longer borne with impunity. These complaints produced a convention between the two crowns, concluded at Prado, importing, that two plenipotentiaries should meet at Madrid, to regulate the respective pretensions of either kingdom, respect­ing the trade in America, and the limits of Florida and Carolina. These conferences were to be finish­ed in eight months; and, in the mean time, all ho­stile preparations should cease on either side. His Catholic Majesty agreed to pay the King of Great Bri­tain ninety-five thousand pounds, to satisfy the de­mands of the British subjects upon the crown of Spain, after deducting from the whole the demands of the crown and subjects of Spain upon that of Britain. Such an agreement as this was justly re­garded on the side of the British ministry as a base desertion of the honour and interests of their coun­try. And when the house of commons came to take the convention under consideration, it produced the warmest debate. All the adherents to the Prince of Wales had joined in the opposition. It was alledg­ed, that the Spaniards, instead of granting a redress, had rather extorted a release for their former conduct. That they still asserted their former right to search­ing English ships, and had not so much as men­tioned the word satisfaction in all the treaty. Not­withstanding all the remonstrances against this treaty, the majority of the house declared in its favour; and several members of the opposite sentiment retired from parliament, having despaired of being longer [Page 155] serviceable in a place where party, and not reason, prevailed.

As Spain had engaged to pay a large sum of money by this convention, some time after, when the mini­ster demanded a supply, upon a different occasion, Lord Bathurst moved to know, whether Spain had paid the sums stipulated, as the time limited for the payment was expired. The Duke of Newcastle, by his Majesty's permission, acquainted the house, that it was not paid; and that Spain had assigned no rea­son for the delay. In some measure, therefore, to atone for his former slowness, the minister now be­gan to put the nation into a condition for war. Let­ters of reprisal were granted against the Spaniards. These preparations were regarded by the Spanish court as actual hostilities. The French ambassador at the Hague declared, that the King his master was obliged, by treaties, to assist the King of Spain; he dissuaded the Dutch from espousing the cause of Eng­land; who promised him an inviolable neutrality. It is curious enough to consider the revolutions which the political system of Europe had undergone. But about twenty years before, France and Eng­land were combined against Spain; at present, France and Spain united against England. Those statesmen who build upon alliances as a lasting basis of power, will, at length, find themselves fatally mistaken.

A rupture between Great Britain and Spain being now become inevitable, the people, who had long clamoured for war, began to feel uncommon alacrity at its approach; and the ministry finding it unavoid­able, began to be earnest in preparation. Orders were issued for augmenting the land forces, and rais­ing a body of marines. Two rich Spanish prizes were taken in the Mediterranean, and war declared against them in form. Admiral Vernon was sent to the West-Indies, commander of the fleet, in order [...]o distress the Spaniards in that part of the globe. [Page 156] Vernon was a rough and honest soldier, untainted with the corruption or the effeminacy of the times. He had, in the house of commons, asserted, that Porto-Bello, a fort and harbour in South America, might be easily taken, and that he himself would undertake to reduce it with six ships only. A pro­ject which appeared so wild, and impossible, was ri­diculed by the ministry; but, as he still insisted upon the proposal, they were pleased in complying with his request. This would at once rid them of a trouble­some antagonist in the house; and, in case of his failure, there would be a new cause of triumph in his disgrace. In this, however, they were disappointed. The admiral, with six ships only, attacked and de­molished all the fortifications of the place, and came away victorious, almost without bloodshed. This dawning of success upon the British arms induced the house of commons to enter vigorously into the King's measures for carrying on the war. They in­abled him to equip a very powerful navy; they voted a subsidy to the King of Denmark, and impowered their Sovereign to defray some other expences, not specified in the estimates; the whole of their grants amounting to about four millions. The war was carried on with vigour, and the debates in the house of commons became less violent. In a nation, like England, of arts, arms, and commerce, war, at cer­tain intervals of time, must ever be serviceable. It turns the current of wealth from the industrious to the enterprising. Thus, all orders of mankind find encouragement, and the nation becomes composed of individuals, who have skill to acquire property, and who have courage to defend it.

I am, &c.

LETTER XIX.

A War between England and Spain was sufficient to communicate disturbances over all the globe. Countries that were once too obscure to be known, were now seen to send out fleets, one ship of which was capable of destroying all the naval power of an Asiatic empire. A squadron of ships commanded by Commodore Anson was equipped, in order to sail through the Streights of Magellan into the South Sea, and to act against the enemy on the coasts of Chili and Peru. This fleet was to co-operate occasionally with Admiral Vernon across the Isthmus of Darien; but the delays and blunders of the ministry frustrated this scheme, though originally well laid. However, though too late in the season, the Commodore set forward with five ships of the line, a frigate, and two store-ships, supplied with provisions and other mer­chandize, designed to carry on a trade with the sa­vage inhabitants of that part of the world, or to conciliate their affections. The number of men a­mounted, in all, to about fourteen hundred, includ­ing two hundred invalids taken from the hospitals, and two hundred new raised recruits. This whole expedition is a fine instance of the power of perse­verance in forcing fortune. The Commodore steer­ed his course by the island of Madeira, proceeded to the Cape Verd Islands, and sailed along the coasts of Brazil. He refreshed for some time at the island of St. Catharine, in twenty-seven degrees of southern latitude; a spot that enjoys all the verdure and fruit­age of those luxurious climates. From this place he steered still onward into the cold and tempestuous cli­mates of the south, along the coast of Patagonia; and, in about five months, entered the famous Streights of Magellan. After having suffered the most violent tem­pests he doubled Cape Horn; the rest of his fleet were [Page 158] dispersed or wrecked; his crew deplorably disabled by the scurvy; and his own ship with difficulty ar­rived on the Island of Juan Fernandez. In this de­licious abode he remained for some time, where na­ture seemed, in some measure, to console mankind far the calamities of their own avarice and ambition [...] In order to improve still farther a retreat of such elegance, he ordered several European seeds and fruits to be sown upon the island, which increased to such a surprising degree, that some Spaniards, who, seve­ral years after, landed there, and found them in plenty, could not avoid acknowledging this act of generosity and benevolence. Here the Commodore was joined by one ship more of his fleet, and by the Tryal frigate of seven guns. Advancing now north­ward, towards the tropic of Capricorn, he attacked the city of Payta by night. In this bold attempt he made no use of his ships, nor even landed all his men. A few soldiers landed by night, and filled the whole town with terror and confusion. The governor of the garrison, and the inhabitants, fled on all sides; accustomed to cruelty over a conquered enemy them­selves, they expected a similitude of treatment. In the mean time, for three days, a small number of English kept possession of the town, and stripped it of all its treasures and merchandize, to an immense a­mount. Such of the negroes as had not fled were made use of in carrying the goods of their former masters on board the English shipping; and the Spa­niards refusing to treat soon saw their town all in flames. This, however, was but a small punish­ment for all the cruelties which they had practised in taking possession of that country, upon its first in­habitants. The plunder of this place served to in­rich the captors; and the ravage made among them, by the scurvy, still increased the share of every sur­vivor. This small squadron now came up as far as Pa­nama, situated on the Streights of Darien. Thus they [Page 159] came upon on the western side of the great American continent; and Admiral Vernon was expcted to succeed on the opposite side nearer home. Thus the Spanish Empire was attacked on both sides; but the scheme failed from Vernon's want of success.

Anson, who now only commanded two ships, the remainder having either put back to England, or, being wrecked by the tempests, bounded all his hopes to the taking one of those rich Spanish ships, which trade between the Philippine islands, near the coast of China and Mexico, on the Spanish main. But one or two, at the most, of these vessels passed from one continent to the other in a year. The ships are made immensely strong, large, and carry great quan­ties of treasure and merchandize. The Commodore therefore, and his little fleet, traversed that great ocean lying between the Asiatic and American con­tinent, in hopes of meeting this rich prize, which it was hoped would, at this time of the year, return from the East, and would amply repay the adventurers for all their dangers and fatigues. Avarice thus became honourable when pursued through peril and distress. But the scurvy once more visited his mariners, now long kept at sea, and without fresh provisions. This disorder, though it takes the same name, is very dif­ferent from that on land. The sea scurvy is attend­ed with an universal putrefaction, the teeth loosen, old wounds that had been healed again open, and sometimes the limbs are seen to drop off at the joints. By this terrible disorder several of his men daily fell, and others were disabled. One of his ships be­coming leaky, and the number of his hands decreas­ing, he thought proper to set it on fire in the midst of the ocean. His fleet now being reduced only to one ship, called the Centurion, of sixty guns, and all the crew in the most deplorable situation, he cast an­chor on the deserted island of Tinian, which lies About half way between the old and new world. [Page 160] This island had some years before been peopled by near thirty thousand inhabitants, but an epidemical distemper coming among them, destroyed a part; and the rest forsook the place. Nothing, however, could exceed the beauty of this spot. The most ro­mantic imagination cannot form a scene surpassing what Tinian naturally afforded; greens, groves, cas­cades, fields, flowers, and prospects. This retreat saved the English squadron. All that a sea-beaten company of mariners could wish, they found here in great abundance; clear and wholesome water, me­dicinal herbs, domestic animals, and other necessa­ries for refitting their shattered vessel. Thus refresh­ed, he went forward towards China, passed by the kingdom of Formosa, and went up the river Canton in order to careen the only ship that now was left him. Being thus far on his way homeward, nothing can better testify the hardy and untameable spirit of the English, than his venturing once more back into the same ocean where he had experienced such a va­riety of distress. The Commodore having put his vessel into good order, by the assistance of the Chi­nese, and having taken Dutch and Indian sailors on board, he again returned towards America. At length, on the 9th of June, he discovered the galleon he so ardently expected. This vessel was formed as well for the purposes of war as of merchandize. It mount­ed sixty guns and five hundred men, while the crew of the Commodore did not exceed half that number. The engagement soon began; but as those who op­pose have always the advantage of those who de­fend, and as the English are more expert in naval affairs than any other nation; the Spanish ship soon became the Centurion's prize. There were but a few men killed on the side of the English, while the Spaniards lost near seventy. The conqueror now returned to Canton oncemore with his prize. He there maintained the honour of his country, in re­fusing [Page 161] to pay the imposts which were laid upon ordi­nary merchants; and insisted that an English ship of war was exempted from such a duty. From Canton he proceeded to the Cape of Good Hope, and prose­cuted his voyage to England, where he arrived in safety, with immense riches. His last prize was valued at three hundred and thirteen thousand pounds ster­ling; and the different captures that had been made before this last piece of good fortune, might amount to as much more. Upon his return, Commodore Anson received all that honour which prudence and perseverance deserve. He soon became the oracle consulted in all naval deliberations; the King after wards raised him to the dignity of the peerage; and he was made first Lord of the Admiralty.

I am, &c.

LETTER XX.

THE expedition of Anson took up near three years. The English, in the mean time, car­ried on their operations against Spain with vigour, and various success. When Anson had set out, it was only to act a subordinate part to a formidable armament, designed for the coasts of New Spain, consisting of twenty-nine ships of the line, and al­most an equal number of frigates, furnished with all kinds of warlike stores, and near fifteen thousand seamen, and twelve thousand land forces. Never was a fleet more completely equipped, nor never had the nation more sanguine hopes of victory. Lord Cathcart commanded the land forces; but, dying on the passage, the command devolved upon General Wentworth, whose chief merit was his favour with [...]hose in power. This, with several other unfortunate [...]ircumstances, concurred to frustrate the hopes of the [Page 162] Public. The ministry, without any visible reason, had detained the fleet in England until the season for action was almost over. In the country where they were to carry on their operations, periodical rains begin about the end of April; and this change in the atmosphere is always attended with epidemical dis­tempers. They, at length, however, set sail for the continent of New Spain; and, after some tempests, and some delays, arrived before Carthagena. This city, which lies within sixty miles of Panama, serves as the magazine for the Spanish merchandize, which is brought from Europe hither, and from thence tran­sported, by land, to Panama, lying on the opposite coast. The taking of Carthagena therefore would interrupt the whole trade between Old Spain and the New. The troops were landed on the island Terra Bomba, near the mouth of the harbour, known by the name of the Bocca-Chica, which was fortified with all the arts of engineering. The Bri­tish forces erected a battery on shore, with which they made a breach in the principal fort, while the Admiral sent in a number of ships to divide the fire of the enemy; and to co-operate with the endea­vours of the army. The breach being deemed prac­ticable, the forces advanced to the attack; but the Spaniards deserted the forts; which, had they courage, they might still have defended with success [...] The troops, upon this success, were brought neare [...] the city, where they found a greater opposition tha [...] they had expected. The climate killed numbers o [...] the men; and a dissension which arose between th [...] land and naval officers, retarded all the operations [...] Stimulated by mutual recriminations, the general ordered his troops to attack the fort of St. Lazar; but th [...] guides being slain, the troops mistook their way, an [...] attacked the strongest part of the fortification, where after suffering incredible slaughter, with the most serene intrepidity, they were, at length, obliged to retire. [Page 163] Bad provisions, a horrid climate, and epidemi­cal fever, still more contributed to thin their num­bers, and to deprive them of all hopes of success. It was determined therefore to reimbark the troops, and to conduct them, as soon as possible, from this scene of slaughter and contagion. The fortifications and harbour were demolished; and the fleet returned to Jamaica. This fatal miscarriage, which tarnished the British arms, was no sooner known in England, than the kingdom was filled with murmurs and dis­content; a measure which, if it had succeeded, would have crowned the promoters of it with honour, now only served to cover them with reproach. The greatest part of this discontent fell upon the mini­ster; his former conduct, which justly deserved cen­sure, was not so powerfully objected against him, as this failure, of which he was innocent. It is not vil­lainy, but misfortune that finds censure from man­kind. Besides, the activity of the enemy, in distress­ing the trade of England contributed to increase the murmurs of the people. Their privateers were so numerous and successful, that in the beginning of this year they had taken, since the commencement of the war, four hundred and seven ships, belonging to the subjects of Great Britain. The English, though at immense expence in equipping fleets, seemed tame­ly to lie down under every blow, and suffered one loss after another without reprisal. This general dis­content had a manifest influence upon the election of members for the new parliament. All the adherents of the Prince of Wales, who now lived, retired from the court as a private gentleman, concurred in the opposition to the ministry. Obstinate struggles were maintained in all parts of the kingdom; and such a national spirit of opposition prevailed, that the Country interest seemed, at length, to preponderate [...]n the house of commons. It was soon seen that the [...]nterest of the minister was in the wane, and that [Page 164] opinion, once established, began to deprive him of even those who had determined to act with neutra­lity. In proclinantes, as Ovid says, omne recumbit onus.

Sir Robert now tottered on the brink of ruin. He was sensible that nothing but a division in the oppo­sition could give him safety. The Prince was his most formidable rival; a Prince revered by the whole nation, for his humanity, benevolence, and candour [...] These were only private virtues; but these were al [...] he had then a liberty of exercising. The minister's first attempt was, to endeavour taking him from the party; a message therefore was carried to his roya [...] highness by the Bishop of Oxford, importing, that i [...] the Prince would write a letter to the King, he and all his counsellors should be taken into favour, fifty thousand pounds should be added to his revenue, two hundred thousand given him to pay his debts, and suitable provision should be made, in due time, for all his followers. This, to a Prince already involved in debt, from the necessity of keeping up his dignity [...] was a tempting offer; but his royal highness gene­rously disdained it, declaring he would accept no such conditions which were dictated to him under the influence of Sir Robert Walpole. The minister now therefore saw that no arts could dissolve the combination against him; he resolved, as an expiring struggle, to try his strength once more in the house of commons upon a disputed election; but he had the mortification to see the majority still increased against him by sixteen voices. He then declared he would never sit in that house more. The parliament was adjourned the next day, and Sir Robert being created Earl of Orford, resigned all his employments. Never was a joy more universal and sincere than this resignation produced. The people now flattered themselves that all their domestic grievances would find redress; that their commerce would be protected abroad; that the war would be carried on with vi­gour; [Page 165] and that the house of commons would be unanimous in every measure. But they were disap­pointed in most of their expectations. The miscon­duct of a minister is more likely to affect his suc­cessor than himself, as a weak reign ever produces a feeble succession. The house of commons had been for a long time increasing in power, and Walpole, with all his arts, was, in fact, rather weakening than extending the prerogative. By his method of brib­ing opposition he had taught the venal to oppose him; and, by his increasing the national debt, he weakened the vigour of the crown in war, and made it more dependant upon parliament in times of peace. A part of those who succeeded him were therefore sensible of this, and still resolved to support the crown, which they regarded as the only declining branch of the constitution. Another part, who cla­moured from motives of self-interest, having now attained the object of their desires, blundered on in the former measures, studious of fortune and not of fame. In short, his successors pursuing all the former schemes of the deposed minister, presented the poli­tical part of the nation with the mortifying prospect of pretended patriotism unstripped of its mask, and shewed the little certainty there is in all political rea­sonings.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXI.

THE war with Spain had now continued for several years, with but indifferent success. Some insuccessful expeditions were carried on in the West-Indies under Admiral Vernon, Commodore Knowles, and others; and these were all aggravated by a set of worthless and mercenary things, called Political Writers. A class of beings first employed against [Page 166] Walpole, and afterwards encouraged by him, at the expence, as it is said, of not less than thirty thou­sand a year. These were men naturally too dull to shine in any of the politer kinds of literature, which might adorn either a scholar or a gentleman; and therefore they turned their thoughts to politics; a science on which they might declaim without know­ledge, and be dull without detection. These men, I say, had, for some time, embarrassed the constitution, inflamed the people, and were paid with large pen­sions from the crown. It was upon this occasion that they exaggerated every misconduct, and drew fright­ful pictures of the distress and misery which they foreboded to posterity. This clamour, and want of success in a naval war, in which the principal strength of the kingdom lay, induced the new ministry to di­vert the attention of the public to a war, which might be carried on by land. The King's attach­ment to his Electoral dominions contributed still more to turn the current of British indignation that way, and an army was therefore now prepared to be sent into Flanders; the war with Spain being be­come an object of secondary consideration.

To have a clear, yet concise, idea of the origin of the troubles on the continent, it will be expedient to go back, for some years, and trace the measures of the European republic to that period where we for­merly left them. After the Duke of Orleans, who had been regent of France, died, Cardinal Fleury undertook to settle that confusion in which the former had left the kingdom. His moderation was equal to his prudence; he was sincere, frugal, modest, and simple. Under him France repaired her losses, and inriched herself by commerce; he only left the state to its own natural methods of thriving, and saw it daily assuming its former health and vigour. During the long interval of peace, which his councils had procured for Europe, two powers, unregarded, now [Page 167] began to attract the notice, and the jealousy of their neighbouring states. Peter the Great had already civi­lized Russia, and this new extensive empire began to influence the councils of other Princes, and to give laws to the North. The other power was that of Prussia, whose dominions were compact and popu­lous, and whose forces were well maintained, and ready for action. The Empire continued under Charles VI, who had been placed upon the throne by the treaty of Utrecht. Sweden languished, be­ing not yet recovered from the destructive projects of Charles XII. Denmark was powerful; and part of Italy subject to the masters which had been imposed upon it by foreign treaties. All, however, continued to enjoy a profound peace, till the death of Au­gustus, King of Poland, again kindled up the gene­ral flame. The Emperor Charles VI, assisted by the arms of Russia, declared for the Elector of Saxony, son to the deceased King. On the other hand, France declared for Stanislaus, who had been long since elected King of Poland by Charles XII, and whose daughter had been since married to the French King. Stanislaus repaired to Dantzick in order to support his election; ten thousand Russians appear­ing, the Polish nobility dispersed, and their new elect­ed Monarch was shut up, and besieged by so small a number of forces: the city was taken, and the King [...]scaped with the utmost difficulty, being made a pri­ [...]oner, and fifteen hundred Frenchmen that were sent [...]o his assistance were made prisoners of war. He [...]ad now no hopes left but in the assistance of France, which accordingly resolved to give him powerful suc­ [...]ours, by distressing the house of Austria. The views [...]f France were seconded by Spain and Sardinia; [...]oth hoped to grow more powerful by a division of [...]he spoils of Austria; and France had motives of [...]liance and revenge. A French army therefore soon [...]ver-ran the empire under the conduct of old Marshal [Page 168] Villars; the Duke of Montemar, the Spanish gene­ral, was equally victorious in the kingdom of Na­ples; and the Emperor, Charles VI, had the morti­fication of seeing himself deprived of the greatest part of Italy, for having attempted to give a King to Poland. These rapid successes of France and its allies soon compelled the Emperor to demand a peace. By this treaty Stanislaus, upon whose account the war was undertaken, was obliged to renounce all right to the throne of Poland; and France made some valuable acquests of dominion; particularly the Duchy of Lorrain. In the year 1740, the death of the Emperor gave the French another opportunity of exerting their ambition. Regardless of treaties, particularly the pragmatic sanction, as it was called, which settled upon the daughter of the Emperor the reversion of all his dominions, they caused the Elec­tor of Bavaria to be crowned Emperor. Thus the daughter of Charles VI, descended from an illustri­ous line of Emperors, saw herself stripped of her in­heritance, and, for an whole year, without hopes of succour. She had scarce closed her father's eyes, when she lost Silesia, by an irruption of the young King of Prussia, who seized the opportunity of her defenceless state, to renew his ancient pretensions to that province of which it must be owned his ances­tors had been unjustly deprived. France, Saxony, and Bavaria, attacked the rest of her dominions. In this forlorn situation she found a powerful ally in Britain; Sardinia and Holland soon after came to her assistance; and, last of all, Russia joined in her cause. It may be demanded, What part Britain had in these continental measures? The interests of Hanover; the security and aggrandizement of that Electorate, depended upon the proper regulation of the empire. Lord Carteret had now taken that place in the royal confidence which had formerly been possessed by Walpole; and, by pursuing these mea­sures [Page 169] he soothed the wishes of his master, and opened a more extensive field for his own ambition. He ex­pected honour from victories which could produce no good; and campaigns, whether successful or not, that could only terminate in misfortune. When the par­liament met, his Majesty informed them of his strict adherence to his engagements, though attacked in his own dominions; and that he had augmented the Bri­tish forces in the Low Countries with sixteen thou­sand Hanoverians. When the supplies came to be considered, by which this additional number of troops was to be paid, it raised violent debates in both houses. It was considered as hiring the troops of the Electorate to fight their own cause. The mi­nistry, however, who were formerly remarkable for declaiming against continental measures, now boldly stood up for them; and, at length, by dint of num­ber, carried their cause. The people saw, with pain, their former defenders sacrificing the blood and trea­sure of the nation upon destructive alliances; they knew not now on whom to rely for safety; and be­gan to think that patriotism was but an empty name. However injurious these measures might have been to the nation, they were of infinite service to the Queen of Hungary. She began, at this period, to triumph over all her enemies. The French were driven out of Bohemia. Her general, Prince Charles, at the head of a large army, invaded the dominions of Bavaria. Her rival, the nominal Emperor, was obliged to fly before her; abandoned by his allies, and stripped of all his dominions, he repaired to Francfort, where he lived in indigence and obscurity. He agreed to remain neuter during the remainder of [...]he war; while the French, who first began it as al­ [...]ies, supported the burthen. The troops sent by England to the Queen's assistance were commanded by the Earl of Stair, an experienced commander, who had learned the art of war under the famous [Page 710] Prince Eugene; and the chief object he had first in view was, to effect a junction with the army com­manded by Prince Charles of Lorrain. The French, in order to prevent this junction, assembled sixty thousand men upon the river Mayne, under the com­mand of Marshal Noailles, who posted his troops upon the east side of that river. The British forces, to the number of forty thousand, pushed forward on the other side, while the French, in the mean time, found means to cut off all the communications by which they could be supplied with provisions. The King of England arrived at the camp while the army was in this situation; and seeing it in danger of starving, resolved to proceed forward, to join twelve thousand Hanoverians and Hessians, who had reached Hanau. With this view he decamped; but before the army had marched three leagues, he found the enemy had inclosed him on every side, near a village called Detingen.. In this situation he must have fought at great disadvantage, if he began the attack; and if he continued in the same situation, his army must have perished for want o [...] subsistence. The impetuosity of the French, how­ever, saved the English army; they passed a defil [...] which they should have guarded; and, under the conduct of the Duke of Gramont, their horse charg­ed with great impetuosity. They were received by the English infantry with undaunted resolution; th [...] French were obliged to give way, and to pass th [...] Mayne with great precipitation, with the loss o [...] about five thousand. The King, who was possesse [...] of personal courage, which seems hereditary to th [...] family, exposed himself to a severe fire of cannon [...] as well as musquetry; and, in the midst of the rank [...] encouraged his troops, by his presence and example [...] The whole of the battle, on either side, exhibited mo [...] courage than conduct. The English had the hono [...] of the day; but the French soon after took possessi [...] of the field of bat [...]le, treating the wounded Engli [...] [Page 171] that were left behind with a clemency unprecedented in ancient history, and that serves to shew how much superior the present times are in point of humanity to the boasted ages of antiquity. Though the Eng­lish were victorious upon this occasion, yet the Earl of Stair, who commanded, did not assume any ho­nour from such a victory; he was unwilling that his reputation should suffer for measures, which he was not allowed to conduct; he therefore solicited, and obtained leave to resign; and the British troops de­sisted from further operations that campaign.

Mean while the French went on with vigour on every quarter; they opposed Prince Charles of Lor­rain, and interrupted his progress in his attempts to pass the Rhine, gained some successes in Italy; but their chief expectations were placed in a projected in­vasion of England. Cardinal Fleury was now dead, and Cardinal Tencin succeeded to his place a person of a very different character from his predecessor, proud, turbulent, and enterprizing. France. from the violence of parliamentary disputes in England, had been long persuaded that the country was ripe for a revolution, and only wanted the presence of the Pretender to induce the majority to declare against the reigning family. Several needy adventurers, who wished for a change; some men of broken fortunes, and almost all the Roman Catholics of the kingdom, endeavoured to confirm the court of France in these sentiments. An invasion therefore was actually pro­ [...]ected. Charles, son of the old Chevalier St. George, [...]eparted from Rome in the disguise of a Spanish [...]ourier, and prosecuting his journey to Paris, had [...]n audience of the French King. The troops de­ [...]igned for this expedition amounted to fifteen thou­ [...]and; preparations were made for embarking them [...]t Dunkirk, and some other of the nearest ports to England, under the eye of the young Pretender; and [...]even thousand of the number actually went on [Page 172] board. The Duke de Roquefuille, with twenty ship of the line, was to see them landed safely in England; and Count Saxe was to command them, when put ashore. The whole project, however, was discon­certed by the appearance of Sir John Norris, with a superior fleet, making up against them; the French fleet was obliged to put back; a very hard gale of wind damaged their transports beyond redress. All hopes of invasion were now frustrated; and, at length, the French thought fit openly to declare war.

But, though fortune seemed to favour England on this occasion, yet, on others, she was not equally propitious. The combined fleets of France and Spain, for some time, fought the British armament under Admiral Matthews and Lestock, though with infe­rior forces, and came off upon nearly equal terms, Such a parity of success in England was regarded as a defeat. Both the English Admirals were tried by a court-martial; Mathews, who had fought the ene­my with intrepidity, was declared incapable of serv­ing for the future in his Majesty's navy. Lestock, who had kept aloof, was acquitted with honour, for he had intrenched himself within the punctilios of discipline; he barely did his duty; a man of honour, when his country is at stake, should do more.

The proceedings in the Netherlands were still more unfavourable. The French had assembled a formid­able army of one hundred and twenty thousand men; the chief command of which was given to Count Saxe. This General was originally a soldier of for­tune, and natural son to Augustus King of Poland, by the famous Countess of Konigsmark. He had been bred from his youth in camps, and had shewn the most early instances of cool intrepidity. He, in the beginning of the war, had offered his service to several crowns, and, among the rest, it is said, to [...]hat of England; but his offers were rejected. He [Page 173] was possessed of great military talents; and, by long habit, preserved an equal composure in the midst of battle, as in a drawing-room at court. On the other side, the allied forces, consisting of English, Hano­verians, Dutch, and Austrians, did not amount to above seventy thousand. These were incapable of withstanding such a superior force, and commanded by such a General. The French besieged and took Fribourg, before they went into winter quarters; and early the next campaign invested the city of Tournay. The allies were resolved to prevent the loss of this city by a battle. Their army was infe­rior, and they were commanded by the Duke of Cum­berland. Notwithstanding these disadvantages they marched towards the enemy, and took post in sight of the French army, which was incamped on an eminence; the village of Antoine on the right, a wood on their left, and the town of Fontenoy before them. This advantageous situation did not repress [...]he ardour of the English; on the thirtieth day of April the Duke of Cumberland marched to the at­ [...]ack at two o'clock in the morning. The British [...]nfantry pierced forward, bore down all opposition, [...]nd, for near an hour, were victorious. Marshal Saxe was at that time sick of the same disorder of which he afterwards died. He visited all the posts [...] a litter, and saw, notwithstanding all appearances, [...]hat the day was his own. The English column, [...]ithout command, by a mere mechanical courage, [...]ad advanced upon the enemies lines, which formed [...]n avenue on each side to receive them. The French [...]rtillery began to play upon this forlorn body; and, [...]ough they continued a long time unshaken, they [...]ere obliged to retreat about three o'clock in the af­ [...]rnoon. This was one of the most bloody battles [...]at had been fought this age; the allies left upon [...]e field near twelve thousand slain; and the French [...]ught their victory with near an equal number.

[Page 174] This blow, by which Tournay was taken, gave the French a manifest superiority all the rest of the campaign, and which they did not forego during the continuance of the war. The Emperor, Charles VII, who had been raised to the throne from the duke­dom of Bavaria, and for whom the war first began was now dead; yet this did not in the least restore tranquility to Europe. The Grand Duke of Tus­cany, husband to the Queen of Hungary, was de­clared Emperor upon his decease; but the war be­tween France and the allies still continued; and the original views and interests seemed now quite for­gotten.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXII.

THE intended French invasion had rouzed al [...] the attention of the English ministry; and nothing but loyalty breathed throughout the whol [...] kingdom. The administration of affairs being committed to the Earl of Harrington, the Earl of Chesterfield, and others, who enjoyed a great share of popularity, the views of the crown were no longe [...] thwarted by an opposition in parliament. The Admiral [...] Rowley and Warren had retrieved the honour of th [...] British flag, and made several rich captures. Louisburg in the island of Cape Breton, in North America, a place of great consequence to the Britis [...] commerce, surrendered to General Pepperel, whil [...] a short time after, two French East-India ships, an [...] another from Peru laden with treasure, supposing th [...] place still in possession of the French, sailed into th [...] harbour, and their capture added to the English success. It was in this period of universal satisfactio [...] that the son of the old Pretender resolved to mak [...] [Page 175] an effort at gaining the British crown. Young Charles Edward, the adventurer in question, had been bred in a luxurious court without sharing its effeminacy; he was enterprising and ambitious; but, either from inexperience, or natural inability, utterly unequal to the undertaking. He was flattered by the rash, the superstitious, and the needy, that the kingdom was ripe for a revolt; that the people could no longer bear the immense load of taxes, which was daily in­creasing; and that the most considerable persons in the kingdom would gladly seize the opportunity of crowding to his standard. Being furnished with some money, and still larger promises from France, who fanned this ambition in him, from which they hoped to gain some advantages; he embarked for Scot­land on board a small frigate, accompanied by the Marquis Tullibardine, Sir. Thomas Sheridan, and a few other desperate adventurers. For the conquest of the whole British empire he brought with him seven officers, and arms for two thousand men. For­tune, which ever persecuted his family, seemed no way more favourable to him; his convoy, a ship of sixty guns, was so disabled in an engagement with an English man of war, called the Lion, that it re­turned to Brest, while he was obliged to continue his course to the western parts of Scotland; and, landing on the coast of Lochaber, he was, in a little time, joined by some chiefs of the Highland Clans, and their vassals. These chiefs had ever continued to exercise an hereditary jurisdiction over all their tenants. This power of life and death vested in the Lords of the manor, was a privilege of the old feu­dal law, long abolished in England, but which had been confirmed to the Scotch lairds at the time of the union. From hence we see, that a chief had the power of commanding all his vassals, and that im­mediate death was the consequence of their disobey­ [...]ng. By means of these chiefs therefore he soon [Page 176] saw himself at the head of fifteen hundred men; and invited others to join him by his manifestoes, which were dispersed throughout all the Highlands.

The boldness of this enterprize astonished all Eu­rope; it awakened the fears of the pusillanimous, the pity of the wise, and the loyalty of all. The whole kingdom seemed unanimously bent upon opposing the enterprize, which they were sensible, as being sup­ported only by Papists, would be instrumental in re­storing Popery. The ministry was no sooner con­firmed of the truth of his arrival, which, at first, they could scarely be induced to believe, than Sir John Cope was ordered to oppose his progress. In the mean time, the young adventurer marched to Perth, where the unnecessary ceremony was perform­ed of proclaiming the Chevalier de St. George, his father, King of Great Britain. The rebel army, descending from the mountains, seemed to gather as it went. They advanced towards Edinburgh, which they entered without opposition. Here too the pa­geantry of proclamation was performed, in which he promised to dissolve the union, and redress the grievances of the country. But, though he was master of the capital, yet the citadel, which goes by the name of the Castle, a strong fortress built upon a rock, and commanded by General Guest, braved all his attempts. In the mean time, Sir John Cope, who had pursued them to the Highlands, but declin­ed meeting them in their descent, now reinforced by two regiments of dragoons, resolved to march towards Edinburgh, and give them battle. The young adventurer, unwilling to give him time to re­treat, attacked him near Preston-pans, about twelve miles from the capital, and, in a few minutes, put him and his troops totally to the route. This vic­tory, in which the King lost about five hundred men, gave the rebels great influence; and, had the Pre­tender taken advantage of the general consternation, [Page 177] and marched towards England, the consequence might have been dangerous to the safety of the state; but he spent the time at Edinburgh, seeming to enjoy the useless parade of royalty, pleased at being addressed and treated as a King. By this time he was joined by the Earl of Kilmarnock, the Lords Elcho, Balmerino, Ogilvy, Pitsligo, and the eldest son of the Lord Lovat. This Lord Lovat was the same whom we have seen, upon a former occasion, trusted by the old Pretender, and betraying him by taking possession of the castle of Stirling for King George. This nobleman, true to neither party, had again altered from his attachment to the house of Hanover, and, in secret, aided the young Cheva­lier; studious only for his own interest, he exerted all the arts of low cunning, to appear an open enemy to the rebellion; yet to give it secret assistance.

While the young Pretender thus trifled away the time at Edinburgh, (for all delays in dangerous en­terprizes are even worse than defeats) the ministry of Great Britain took every possible measure to de­feat his intentions. Six thousand Dutch troops that had come over to the assistance of the crown, were sent northward, under the command of General Wade; but, as it was then said, these could lend no assistance, as they were, properly speaking, prison­ers of France, and, upon their parole, not to oppose that power for the space of one year. How­ever this be, the Duke of Cumberland soon after arrived from Flanders, and was followed by another detachment of dragoons and infantry; voluntiers in different parts of the kingdom employed themselves [...]n the exercise of arms; and every county exerted [...] generous spirit of indignation, both against the [...]mbition, the religion, and the allies of the young [...]dventurer.

It would be illiberal and base, to deny this enter­ [...]ising youth that praise which his merit may deserve. [Page 178] Though he might have brought civil war, and all the calamities attending it, with him, into the kingdom; yet we must consider, that he had ever been taught that bathing his country in blood was but a just as­sertion of his right; that altering the constitution and, perhaps, the religion of his supposed dominions was a laudable object of ambition. Thus inspired he went forward with vigour, and resolving to make an irruption into England, he entered it by the western border, on the sixth day of November. Carlisle was invested, and, in less than three days, it sur­rendered. Here he found a considerable quantity o [...] arms, and was declared King of Great Britain. General Wade being apprized of his progress, advance [...] across the country from the opposite shore; but, receiving intelligence that the enemy were two day [...] march before him, he retired to his former station [...] The young Pretender now resolved to proceed, having received assurances from France that a considerable body of troops would be landed on the souther [...] coast of Britain, to make a diversion in his favour [...] and, flattered with the hopes of being joined by [...] large body of English malecontents, as soon as h [...] should make his appearance among them. Leavin [...] therefore a small garrison in Carlisle, which he shoul [...] rather have left defenceless, he advanced to Penrit [...] marching on foot in an Highland garb, and continue [...] his irruption till he came to Manchester, where h [...] established his head quarters. He was here joine [...] by about two hundred English men, who were forme [...] into a regiment, under the command of Colon [...] Townley. From hence he prosecuted his route t [...] Derby, intending to go by the way of Chester int [...] Wales, where he hoped for a great number of adherents. He was, by this time, advanced within a [...] hundred miles of the capital, which was filled wit [...] terror and confusion. The King resolved to take th [...] field in person. The voluntiers of the city were incorporated [Page 179] into a regiment. The practitioners of the law resolved to take the field, with the judges at their head. Even the managers of the theatres of­fered to raise a body of their dependants for the ser­vice of their country. Yet these combinations only served as instances of the national terror; for the trading part of the city, and those concerned in the money corporations, were overwhelmed with dejec­tion. They could hope for little safety in the cou­rage or discipline of a militia, especially as they, every hour, dreaded an invasion from France, and an insurrection of the Roman Catholics, and other friends to the expelled family. This therefore was the moment for the advancement of the adventurer's enterprize. Had he marched up to the capital, he would undoubtedly have been joined by several, se­cretly attached to his cause. But he determined to retreat once more to Scotland; and thus his scheme was defeated. In fact, he was but nominally the leader of his forces. His Generals, the chiefs of Highland Clans, were, from their education, igno­rant; and, from their independency, obstinate. They each embraced peculiar systems, and began to con­tend with each other for the pre-eminence; so that after violent disputes, they resolved to march back. They effected their retreat to Carlisle without any loss; and from thence crossed the rivers Eden and Solway into Scotland. In this irruption, however, they preserved all the rules of war; they desisted, in a great measure, from rapine; levied contributions; and, in the usual form, left a garrison at Carlisle in their retreat; which, a short time after, to the num­ber of four hundred, surrendered, to the Duke of Cumberland, prisoners at discretion. The Pretender, being returned to Scotland, proceeded to Glasgow; from which city he exacted severe contributions. Advancing to Stirling, he was joined by Lord Lewis Gordon, at the head of some forces which had been [Page 180] assembled in his absence. Other Clans, to the num­ber of two thousand, came in likewise; Spain sent him some supplies of money; and, in one or two skirmishes with the loyalists, his Generals came off with victory; so that his affairs once more seemed to wear an aspect of success. Being joined by John Lord Drummond, he invested the castle of Stirling, commanded by General Blakeney; but his forces be­ing unused to sieges, consumed much time to no purpose. General Hawley, who commanded a con­siderable body of forces near Edinburgh, undertook to raise the siege. He advanced towards the rebel army, and rendezvoused his whole force at Falkirk, while the rebels lay incamped at no great distance. After two days, mutually examining each other's strength, the rebels, on the seventeenth day of Janu­ary, came on in full spirits to attack the King's army. The Pretender, who stood in the front line, gave the signal to fire; and the first volley served to put Hawley's forces into confusion. The horse re­treated with precipitation, and fell in upon their own infantry; the rebels followed their blow; and the greatest part of the royal army fled with the utmost precipitation. They retired in confusion to Edin­burgh, leaving the field of battle, with part of their tents and artillery, to the rebels.

This was the end of all their triumphs. A new scene of conduct was now going to open; for the Duke of Cumberland, at that time the favourite of the English army, had put himself at the head of the troops at Edinburgh, which consisted of about fourteen thousand men. He resolved therefore to come to a battle as soon as possible; and marched forward, while the young adventurer retired at his approach. The Duke advanced to Aberdeen, where he was joined by the Duke of Gordon, and some other Lords, attached to his family and cause. After having refreshed his troops here for some time, he re­newed [Page 181] his march; and, in twelve days, came upon the banks of the deep and rapid river Spey. This was a place where the rebels might have disputed his passage; but they seemed now totally void of all counsel and subordination, without conduct, and without expectation. The Duke still proceeded in his pursuit; and, at length, had advice that the ene­my had advanced from Inverness to the Plain of Culloden, which was about nine miles distant, and there intended to give him battle. On this Plain the Highlanders were drawn up in order of battle, to the number of eight thousand men, in thirteen divisions, supplied with some pieces of artillery. The battle began about one o'clock in the afternoon; the canon of the King's army did dreadful execution among the enemy, while theirs, being but ill served, was ineffectual. One of the great errors in all the Pre­tender's warlike measures, was his subjecting undis­ciplined troops to the forms of artful war, and thus repressing their native ferocity, from which alone he could hope for success. After they had stood the English fire for some time, they, at length, became impatient for closer engagement; and about five hun­dred of them attacked the English left wing, with their accustomed fierceness. The first line being dis­ordered by this onset, two battalions advanced to support it, and galled the enemy by a terrible and close discharge. At the same time the dragoons un­der Hawley, and the Argyleshire militia, pulling down a park wall that guarded the enemy's flank, and which the rebels had left but feebly defended, fell in among them, sword in hand, with great slaugh­ter. In less than thirty minutes they were totally routed, and the field covered with their wounded and slain, to the number of above three thousand men. Civil war is in itself terrible, but still more so when heightened by cruelty. How guilty soever men may be, it is ever the business of a soldier to remember, [Page 182] that he is only to fight an enemy that opposes him, and to spare the supplicant. This victory was in every respect complete; and humanity to the con­quered would even have made it glorious. The con­querors often refused mercy to wretches who were defenceless or wounded; and soldiers were seen to anticipate the base employment of the executioner.

Thus sunk all the hopes, and the ambition of the young adventurer; one short hour deprived him of imaginary thrones and sceptres, and reduced him from a nominal King to a distressed forlorn out-cast, shunned by all mankind, except such as sought to take his life. To the good-natured, subsequent dis­tress often atones for former guilt; and while reason would repress humanity, yet our hearts plead in the favour of the wretched. The Duke, immediately after the decisive action at Culloden, ordered six-and-thirty deserters to be executed; the conquerors spread terror wherever they came; and, after a short time, the whole country round was one scene of slaughter, desolation, and plunder; justice seemed forgotten; and vengeance assumed the name.

In the mean time, the unhappy fugitive adventurer wandered from mountain to mountain, a wretched spectator of all these horrors, the result of his ill-guided ambition. He now underwent a similiarity of adventures with Charles II, after the defeat at Worcester. He sometimes found refuge in caves and cottages, without attendants, and exposed to the mercy of peasants, who could pity but not support him. Sometimes he lay in forests, with one or two companions of his distress, continually purfued by the troops of the conquerors, as there was thirty thousand pounds bid for his head. Sheridan, an Irish adventurer, was he who kept most faithfully by him, and inspired him with courage to support such incre­dible hardships. He was obliged to trust his life to the fidelity of about fifty individuals. One day, hav­ing [Page 183] walked from morning till night, pressed by hun­ger, and worn with fatigue, he ventured to enter an house, the owner of which he well knew was at­tached to the opposite party: The son of your King, said he, entering, comes to beg a bit of bread and cloaths. I know your present attachment to my adversaries, but I be­lieve you to have sufficient honour not to abuse my confidence, or to take the advantage of my misfortunes. Take these rags that have for some time been my only covering, and keep them. You may, probably, restore them to me one day, when seated on the throne of the Kings of Great Bri­tain. His host was touched with his distress; assisted him as far as he was able, and never divulged his secret. In this manner he wandered among the frightful wilds of Glengarry, for near six months, often hemmed round by his pursuers, but still find­ing some expedient to save him from captivity and death. At length a privateer of St. Malo, hired by his adherents, arrived in Lochnanach, on which he embarked, and arrived at France in safety,

Many were the conjectures then, and they still subsist, as to the possibility of the young adventurer's escape. Some were of opinion that the government gave secret orders to the Generals to connive at it; while others still firmly assert, that he was put to death in an out-house, in which a number of the re­bels were inclosed and burnt. Which ever report be most true, certain it is, that the place of his re­treat has ever since been concealed from all the world.

While the Prince thus led a wandering and soli­tary life, the scaffolds and the gibbets were bathed with the blood of his adherents; seventeen officers of the rebel army were executed at Kennington-Com­mon, in the neighbourhood of London, whose con­stancy in death gained more proselytes to their cause than perhaps their victories could have done. Nine were executed in the same manner at Carlisle; six at [Page 184] Brumpton; seven at Penrith; and eleven at York A few obtained pardons; and a considerable numbe were transported to the Plantations. The Earls o Kilmarnock and Cromartie, with the Lord Balmerino were tried by their Peers, and found guilty. Cromartie was pardoned; the other two were beheaded on Tower-Hill. Kilmarnock, either from convic­tion, or from the hope of a pardon, owned his crime, and declared his repentance of it. On the other hand, Balmerino, who had from his youth up, been bred to arms, died in a more daring man­ner. When his fellow sufferer, as commanded, bid God bless King George, Balmerino still held fast to his principles, and cried out, God bless King James, and suffered with the utmost intrepidity. Lord Lovat, and Mr. Radcliff the titular Earl of Derwentwater, suffered the same fate with equal resolution. Thus ended a rebellion, dictated by youth and presumption, and conducted without art or resolution. The fa­mily of Stewart found fortune become more averse at every new solicitation of her favours. Let pri­vate men, who complain of the miseries of this life, only turn to the vicissitudes in that family, and learn to bless God, and be happy.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXIII.

A Rebellion quelled, and mercy shewn to the de­linquents, ever strengthens the reigning cause. How it might have been in the present instance I will not pretend to determine; whether too much ri­gour might have been exerted upon the conquered, posterity must determine; actions of this kind are too near our own times to be either judged of, or talked of with freedom. Immediately after the re­bellion [Page 185] was suppressed, the legislature undertook to establish several regulations in Scotland, which were equally conducive to the happiness of the people there, and the tranquility of the united kingdom. The Highlanders, who had, till this time, continued to wear the old military dress of the Romans, and who always went armed, were now reformed. Their habits were, by act of parliament, reduced to the modern modes; the obedience they were under to their chiefs was abolished, and the lowest subject of that part of the kingdom was granted a participation of British freedom.

But whatever tranquility might have been restored by these means at home, the flames of war still con­tinued to rage upon the continent with its accustomed violence. The French went forward with rapid suc­cess, having reduced almost the whole Netherlands to their obedience. In vain the Dutch negotiated, supplicated, and evaded war; they saw themselves stripped of all those strong towns which defended their dominions from invasion; and they now lay almost defenceless, ready to receive terms from their conquerors. The Dutch, at this time, were very different from their forefathers, the brave assertors of liberty, in the beginning of their republic; the individuals of their state were rich, while the go­vernment was poor; they had lost, in a spirit of traffic and luxury, all generosity of sentiment, and desire of independence; they only sought riches, re­gardless of public virtue. They were divided in their councils between two factions which now subsisted, namely, that which declared for a Stadtholder, and that which, with attachments to France, opposed his election. The prevalence of either side was almost equally fatal to liberty; if a Stadtholder was elected, they then saw their constitution altered from a re­public to a kind of limited monarchy; if the oppo­site party prevailed, they were to feel the weight of a [Page 186] confirmed aristocracy, confirmed by French power, and crouching under its authority. Of the two e [...]s they chose the former; the people, in several to [...]ns, inflamed almost to tumult and sedition, compelled their magistrates to declare for the Prince of Orange as Stadtholder, Captain-general and Admiral of the United Provinces. The vigorous consequences of this resolution immediately appeared; all commerce with the French was prohibited; the Dutch army was augmented; and orders were issued to commence hostilities against the French by sea and land.

Thus we see this war diffused throughout the whole system of Europe, in some measure resembling a disorder, the symptoms of which, at different times, appear in different parts of the body, remitting and raging by turns. At the commencement of the war we have seen the Queen of Hungary upon the point of losing all her possessions. Soon after we saw the unfortunate Duke of Bavaria, who had been chosen Emperor by the name of Charles VII, banished from his throne, stripped of his hereditary dukedom, and ever shrinking from surrounding dangers. We have seen the Duke of Savoy, now King of Sardinia, changing that side which some years before he espoused, and, joining with Austria and England, against the ambitious designs of France, while Italy still felt all the terrors of war, or rather saw foreigners contending with each other for her domi­nions; the French and Spaniards on one side, the Imperialists and the King of Sardinia on the other. Thus Rome, that once gave laws to the world, now saw the troops of Germany and Spain, by turns, enter into her territories; and, after various com­bats, she, at last, saw the Imperialists become ma­sters. The Spaniards and French lost the most flou­rishing armies, notwithstanding the excellent con­duct of the Prince of Conti their General; and, at last, after a bloody victory obtained over the Spa­niards [Page 187] [...] St. Lazaro, the beautiful city of Genoa, which [...]d sided with Spain, was obliged to submit to the conquerors, to suffer some indignities imposed upon them, and to pay a most severe contribution.

The city of Genoa had, for ages before, main­tained its own laws, and boasted of liberty. Besides its inner wall, it had another formed by a chain of rocks of more than two leagues extent; but both being built in those times when modern fortification was yet unknown, it was not thought, by its Senate, capable of making a proper resistance. Upon sub­mitting, the unhappy Italians too soon found that no mercy was to be expected from the court of Vi­enna, which had ever patronized oppression. More than a million sterling was demanded for a contribu­tion; a tax, the payment of which must have utterly ruined the city. The magistrates did all in their power to pay the exorbitant sum demanded; and the German troops exercised every inhumanity in exact­ing it. The conquerors lived upon the people, and treated them with an insolence which was natural to them as conquerors, and as Germans. The Genoese were, at length, reduced to despair, and were resolved to make a last effort for the recovery of their liberty and independence. The Austrians took the cannon of the city, in order to transport them to Provence, where their arms had already penetrated. The Ge­noese themselves were obliged to draw those cannon which they had once considered as the defence and ornament of their citadel. It was on this occasion that an Austrian officer struck one of the citizens, who had been employed in this laborious task. This blow served to animate the people with their former spirit of freedom. They took up arms in every quarter of the town, and surprized some battalions of the Austrians, surrounded others, and cut them in pieces. The Senate, uncertain how to proceed, nei­ther encouraged nor stopped the citizens, who drove [Page 188] the Austrians intirely out, and then appointed com­manders, and guarded the walls with the utmost re­gularity.

This revolution in a little city, the transactions of which has filled whole Folios of history, should not be passed over without remark; though no longer capable of maintaining its liberties amidst the shock of the enormous powers of Europe; yet still we find it possessed of its ancient spirit; only to lose it, how­ever, by the prevailing power of the Senate, which established their aristocracy on the necks of the citi­zens, as before.

In this manner we see victory and miscarriage mutually declaring for either; all sides growing more feeble, and none acquiring any real recompence for the losses sustained. Thus, about this time, the English made an unsuccessful expedition into France, in order to attack Port l'Orient, in which they came off without any honour. The French gained a con­siderable victory at Rocroux in Flanders, over the allies, although it procured them no real advantage; and it cost them a greater number of lives than those whom they obliged to retire. The Dutch, in this general conflict, seemed the greatest losers. A vic­tory gained over the allies at La Feldt served to re­duce them to a still greater degree of distrust in their Generals, than they had hitherto shewn: but the taking of Bergen-op-Zoom, the strongest fortification of Dutch Brabant, and which put the French in possession of the whole navigation of the Schelde, threw them almost into despair. But these victories, in favour of France, were counterbalanced with al­most equal disappointments. In Italy, the French General, Marshal Bellisle's brother, at the head of thirty-four thousand men, attempted to penetrate into Piedmont; but his troops were put to the route, and he himself slain. The French King equipped an un­successful armament for the recovery of Cape Bre­ton; [Page 189] and, not discouraged by this failure, fitted out two squadrons, one to make a descent upon the Bri­tish Colonies in America, and the other to assist the operations in the East Indies. These, however, were attacked by Anson and Warren, and nine of their ships were taken. Soon after this Commodore Fox, with six ships of war, took above forty French ships laden from St. Domingo; and this loss was soon after followed by another defeat, which the French fleet sustained from Admiral Hawke, in which seven ships of the line, and several frigates, were taken.

This variety of success served to make all the powers at war heartily desirous of a peace. The States-General had, for some years, endeavoured to stop the progress of a war, in which they could gain no advantages, and had all to lose. The King of France was sensible, that, after a victory, was the most advantageous opportunity of proposing terms of peace; and even expressed his desire of general tran­quility, in a personal conversation with Sir John Li­gonier, who had been made prisoner in the last victory obtained by the French at La Feldt. The bad suc­cess of his admirals at sea, his Generals misfortunes in Italy, the frequent bankruptcies of his subjects, the election of a Stadtholder in Holland, who opposed his interests, his views in Germany intirely frustrated by the elevation of the Duke of Tuscany to rule the Empire; all these contributed to make him weary of the war. An accommodation was therefore agreed upon; and the contending powers agreed to a con­gress at Aix la Chapelle, where the Earl of Sand­wich and Sir Thomas Robinson assisted as plenipo­tentiaries from the King of Great Britain. The treaty which takes its name from that city, was con­cluded on the seventh day of October, a lasting in­stance of precipitate counsels and English humility. By this it was agreed, that all prisoners, on each [...]ide, should be mutually restored, and all conquests [Page 190] given up. That the Duchies of Parma, Placentia, and Guastalla, should be ceded to Don Philip, heir apparent to the Spanish throne, and his heirs; but in case of his succeeding to the crown of Spain, that then these dominions should revert to the house of Austria. That the fortifications of Dunkirk to the sea should be demolished; that the ship annually sent with slaves to the coast of Spain, should have this privilege continued for four years; that the King o [...] Prussia should be secured in the possession of Silesia [...] which he had conquered; and that the Queen o [...] Hungary should be secured in her patrimonial dominions. But one article of the peace was more displeasing and afflictive to the English than all the rest [...] for it was agreed, that she should give two person [...] of rank and distinction to France as hostages, unt [...] restitution should be made of all the conquests whic [...] England possessed of the enemy, either in the Ea [...] or West-Indies. This was a mortifying stipulation [...] but there was no mention made of the searchin [...] English ships in the American seas, upon which th [...] war originally began. The treaty of Utrecht ha [...] long been a subject of reproach to those by whom [...] was negotiated; but, with all its faults, the trea [...] that was just concluded was far more despicable a [...] erroneous. The honour of the nation was forgo [...] ten; its interests left undetermined. Yet such w [...] the strange infatuation of the multitude, that t [...] treaty of Utrecht was held in universal contemp [...] and this was extolled with the highest strain of pan [...] gyric. The truth is, the people were wearied wi [...] repeated disgrace, and only expected an accumul [...] tion of misfortunes by continuing the war. T [...] ministers and their emissaries, about this period, h [...] the art of persuading men to what they thoug [...] proper, and represented the circumstances of the [...] tion as flourishing, though the public was groani [...] [Page 191] beneath an immense load of debt; and though all measures were guided by an ignorant and unconsti­tutional faction.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXIV.

THIS peace might, in every respect, be termed only a temporary cessation from general hosti­lities; though the war between England and France had actually subsided in Europe, yet in the East and West-Indies they still carried on hostile operations, both sides equally culpable, yet each complaining of the infraction.

In the mean time, as Europe enjoyed a temporary tranquility, the people of England expected, and the government promised them, a restitution of those blessings which had been taken from them by a long and obstinate war. A magnificent firework was played off upon this occasion; which, though an use­less and vain expence, served to amuse the populace, and render them more contented with the late pre­carious treaty.

The ministry also shewed some desire to promote the commerce of the kingdom; and, for this pur­pose, a bill was passed for encouraging a British her­ring fishery, under proper regulations. From such a scheme carried into execution, great advantages were expected to accrue; the Dutch, who had long en­ [...]oyed the sole profits arising from it, considered the [...]ea as a mine of inexhaustible wealth. However, [...]xperience has shewn that the English were either [...]ncapable of turning this fishery to the same ad­ [...]antage, or that their company was not established [...]ith the most strict oeconomy. Private persons have [...]ften been found to make fortunes by this fishery; [Page 192] but the company have found themselves considerabl [...] losers.

A scheme, which, by many, was thought still mor [...] advantageous to the nation, was, the encouragin [...] those who had been discharged the army or navy, t [...] become members of a new colony in North America [...] called Nova Scotia. To this retreat, it was thought [...] the waste of an exuberant nation might well be drained off; and here those free spirits might be kep [...] employed, who, if suffered to remain at home, would only prey upon the community. This was a cold climate, and a barren soil, where the English had a fort, and a small garrison, rather to intimidate the neighbouring French, and repress their incroach­ments, than to derive any advantages from the im­provement of trade, or the cultivation of the coun­try. It was here that a scheme was laid for the foundation of a new colony, which might improve the fishery upon that coast, and become a new source of wealth to the mother country. Thus did the nation exchange her hardy and veteran troops for the expectation of precarious wealth. Every colony taken from the parent country serves to lessen its strength; and all the wealth imported into it, after it has be­come moderately rich, being only used as the instru­ment of luxury, instead of invigorating the nation, tends to render it more effeminate.

However, it was advertised by authority, that all proper encouragement would be given to such officers and private men, who, being discharged from the service of the government, should be willing to set­tle in Nova Scotia. Fifty acres of land were granted to every private soldier or seaman, free from taxes for ten years, and then to pay only one shilling a year. Besides this fifty, ten acres more were to be granted to every individual of which each family should consist. Every officer, under the rank of en­sign, was to have fourscore acres; ensigns were to [Page 193] have two hundred, lieutenants three, captains four, and those above that rank six. Such offers failed not to induce numbers to try their fortunes on that desolate coast; and, in a little time, about four thou­sand adventurers, with their families, were carried thither; a town named Halifax was built; and the colonists left to glean a scanty subsistance from an ungrateful soil. Since that time, notwithstanding all the encouragement this colony has received from the government, the inhabitants have cleared but a very small part of the woods with which the face of the country is covered. Agriculture is quite forsaken; and the settlement intirely subsists by the sums ex­pended by the army and navy stationed in this part of the western world.

Here those voluntary out-casts of their country expected to live, though hardly, yet at least securely; but, in this they found themselves disappointed. The Indians, a savage and fierce people, from the first looked upon these settlements of the English as an in­croachment upon their own liberties; and the French, who were equally jealous, fomented these outrages. Commissaries were therefore appointed to meet at Paris, and compromise these disputes; but these con­ferences were rendered abortive by mutual cavillings, and all the arts of evasion.

In the mean time Mr. Pelham, who chiefly con­ducted the business of the state, and was esteemed a man of candour and capacity, laid a scheme for lightening the immense load of debt that was laid upon the nation. His plan was to lessen the national incumbrance, by lowering the interest which had been promised upon the first raising the supply, or obliging the lenders to receive the sums originally granted. Those who were proprietors of stocks, and received, for the use of their money, four per cent., were, by royal authority, ordered to subscribe their names, sig­nifying their consent to accept of three pounds ten [Page 194] shillings per cent. a year after, and three per cent. onl [...] about six years after their thus subscribing; and, i [...] case of a refusal, that the government would pay o [...] the principal. This scheme was attended with th [...] desired effect; though it, in some measure, was [...] force upon the lender, who had originally grante [...] his money upon different terms, yet it was salutar [...] to the nation; and, as Machiavel has it, politic [...] injustice is sometimes allowable, in order to secur [...] national benefits. Besides this salutary measure, other [...] were pursued by the minister at the helm, with equa [...] success. The importation of iron from America wa [...] allowed, and the trade to Africa laid open to th [...] whole nation; but, at the same time, to be superintended by the board of trade and plantations.

But all the advantages the nation reaped from these salutary measures, were not sufficient to counter-balance the stroke which liberty received (as some are of opinion) by an unusual stretch of the privileges of the house of commons. As this is a point which deserves the strictest attention, permit me to trace it up to the source. The city of Westminster had long been represented by members who were nominated, in some measure, by the ministry; Lord Trentham having vacated his seat in the house, by accepting a place under the crown, he again declared himself a candidate; but met with violent opposition. It was objected to him by some, that he had been uncom­monly active in introducing some French strollers, who had come over to exhibit plays upon the sup­pression of our own. This accusation, whether true or false, excited numbers against him, who styled themselves the independent electors of Westminster, and named Sir George Vandeput, a private gentleman, as his competitor. The opposition resolved to sup­port their candidate at their own expence. They accordingly opened houses of entertainment, solicited votes, and propagated abuse as usual. At length, [Page 195] the poll being closed, the majority appeared in favour of Lord Trentham; a scrutiny was demanded by the other side; it was protracted by the obstinacy of both parties; but this also turning out in favour of Lord Trentham, the independent electors petitioned the house, complaining of an undue election, and of partiality and injustice in the high-bailiff of West­minster, who took the poll. To this petition the house paid little regard, but proceeded to examine the high-bailiff as to the causes that had so long pro­tracted the election; who laid the blame upon Mr. Crowle, who had acted as council for the petitioners, on the honourable Alexander Murray, and one Gib­son an upholsterer. These three persons were there­fore brought to the bar of the house; Crowle and Gibson, after having asked pardon upon their knees, and, being reprimanded by the house, were dismissed. Murray was first admitted to bail; but, after some witnesses had deposed, that he had headed a mob to intimidate the voters, it was voted that he should be committed a close prisoner to Newgate; and, to in­vigorate their measures, that he should receive this sentence at the bar of the house on his knees. He accordingly appeared; but being directed by the Speaker to kneel, refused to comply. This refusal threw the whole house into a commotion; and it was ordered that he should be committed close pri­soner to Newgate, debarred the use of pen, ink, and paper, and that no person should have access to him without permission from the house. This imprison­ment he underwent, sensible that it could continue no longer than while they continued to sit; and, at the close of the session, he was conducted from pri­son to his own house, amidst the acclamations of the people. He now was thought, by many, intirely free from all farther prosecution; but, in this, they were mistaken; for, at the opening of the ensuing sitting of parliament, a motion was made, that Mr. [Page 196] Murray should be again committed close prisoner to the Tower. Hitherto it was supposed by several, that the house of commons had acted with a spirit of resentment. Now it was thought, that they made an attempt at extending their privileges. Though the delinquent, a person of no great consequence in himself, had taken the prudent precautions of re­tiring from their resentment, yet several of the people saw that the house considered itself rather as a body distinct from the people, than the guardians of the people; and, instead of maintaining the liber­ties of the subject in general, attempted to increase their own. Some thought they saw, in this mea­sure, the seeds of future aristocracy; that the house of commons constituted themselves judges of their own privileges; and that the liberty of every indi­vidual in society was at the disposal of a body who professed acting chiefly for their own honour.

However this may be, another measure was soon after taken, which, in reality, made distinctions among the people, and laid an unpassable line be­tween the rich and poor. This was an act for the better preventing clandestine marriages, and for the more public solemnization of that ceremony. The grievance complained of, and which this law was to redress, was, that the sons and daughters of opulent families were often seduced into marriage, before they had acquired sufficient experience in life to be sensible of the disparity of fortune in the match. This statute therefore enacted, that the bans of mar­riage should be regularly published three successive Sundays in the church of the parish where both par­ties had resided for one month at least, before the ceremony. That a marriage which was solemnized without this previous publication, or a license ob­tained from the Bishop's Court, should be void, and the person who solemnized it should be transported for seven years. This act was, at that time, thought [Page 197] replete with consequences injurious to society; and experience has manifested some of them; villains have gone about deceiving ignorant women, under a pretence of marriage, and then have left them without redress. The poor were thus rendered ut­terly incapable of making alliances with the rich; and the wealth of the nation has thus been more li­able to accumulation in opulent families. It has been thought to impede that ardour which impels many to marry; and to clog a ceremony of the most infinite advantage to society, with procrastination and delay. Some have affirmed, that debaucheries and lewdness have become more frequent since the enact­ing this law; and it is believed, that the numbers of the people are upon the decline.

This session of parliament was also distinguished by another act equally unpopular, and, perhaps, equally injurious to the religion of the community. This was a law for naturalizing the Jews. The ministers boldly affirmed, that such a law would greatly contribute to the advantage of the nation; that it would increase the credit and commerce of the kingdom, and set a laudable example of political toleration. Many others, however, were of very different sentiments; they saw that greater favour was shewn, by this bill, to Jews, than to some other sects professing the Christian religion; that an intro­duction of this people into the kingdom would dis­grace the character of the nation, and cool the zeal of the natives already too lukewarm. However, not­withstanding all opposition, this bill was passed into a law; nor was it till the ensuing session of parlia­ment, that it was thought necessary to be repealed.

An act, equally unpopular with the two former, was now also passed, which contained regulations for the better preserving the game. By this none but men already possessed of a stated fortune, had a pri­vilege of carrying a gun, or destroying game, though [Page 198] even upon the grounds which he himself rented. This totally damped all that martial spirit among the lower orders of mankind, by preventing their hand­ling those arms which might one day be necessary to defend their country; and gave the rich the sole in­joyment of a pleasure, which, before, had been con­sidered as the common privilege of humanity. Such were the laws passed this session; through all which a spirit of aristocracy was discerned by some. The body of the rich no longer fearing oppression from the throne, or an infringement of their own liberties, now began to lean heavy upon the poor, and to con­sider the interests of that useful part of society, as in­tirely distinct from their own. They never omitted, however, the usual addresses to the throne; and this session was remarkable for an address of thanks to his Majesty for maintaining, and rendering perma­nent, the general tranquility of Europe, at a time when war was kindling in almost every quarter of the world.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXV.

IF we seek for the origin of that war which now threatened universal devastation, we shall find it kindling up in several countries, both of Europe, America, and Asia, at one and the same time. Most other national contests have arisen from some one principal cause; but this war seems to have been pro­duced by the concurrence of several, or it may be considered as the continuance of the late war, which had not been effectually extinguished by the defective treaty of Aix la Chapelle.

In Asia, upon the coast of Malabar, the English and French had never ceased hostilities. The claim [Page 199] of Prussia and Austria, upon the territories of Silesia, had never been thoroughly adjusted. The limits of Nova Scotia, inhabited by the English, and bordered upon by the French, were never precisely determin­ed; and, southward, the boundaries of Acadia, an extended country belonging to the French, and bor­dering upon Virginia, were equally left uncertain. Negotiations had long been carried on to determine these differences; but what could reason do in deter­mining disputes in which there were no certain prin­ciples to be guided by? The limits of these countries had never been settled; for they were, before this time, thought too remote, or too insignificant, to employ much attention. And it was not probable that powers who had no other right to the countries in dispute, but that of invasion, would have equity enough to agree upon sharing the spoil.

The right which any of the contending powers pretended to, might, in the eye of reason, be thought very controvertible; but the convenience which either party was to derive from the enjoyment of their pecu­liar claims was not so uncertain. As the dissensions seemed to begin in North America, we must turn to that country to consider their rise. The French had been the first cultivators of Nova Scotia, and, by great industry and long perseverance, rendered the soil, na­turally barren, somewhat fertile, and capable of su­staining nature with very little assistance from Europe. This country, however, had frequently changed ma­sters, until the English were acknowledged as the rightful possessors by the treaty of Utrecht. The possession of this country, in any other nation, would expose our colonies to perpetual invasion, and assist them in acquiring a superiority in commerce, and the northern fisheries. It has been already ob­served, that we had an infant colony upon that coast, which was chiefly supported by royal bounty, and struggled with all the disadvantages of the severe cli­mate, [Page 200] and the ungrateful soil. But it had an obstruction to its growth still more formidable than ei­ther. The French, who had been long settled in the back parts of the country, continually spirited up the Indians to repel the new comers; so that some of them were actually murdered, or sold to the French at Louisburg. These violations were complained of, and complaint produced recrimination; so that the two powers of France and England were negotiating with, accusing, and destroying each other all at one time.

Now also began to be observed another source of dispute, which promised as much uneasiness as the former. The French, pretending first to have dis­covered the mouth of the river Mississippi, claimed the whole adjacent country towards New Mexico on the east, quite to the Apalachian Mountains on the west. And finding several Englishmen, who had settled be­yond these mountains, both from motives of com­merce, and invited by the natural beauties of the country, they drove them away, and built such forts as could command the whole country around. It was now, therefore, seen, that their intentions were to surround the English colonies which lay along the shore, by taking possession of the internal parts of the country that lay on the back of our settlements; and being already possessed of the northern and southern shores, thus inclose to us on every side, and secure to themselves all trade with the natives of the country. The English therefore justly apprehended, that if the French were able to unite their northern colonies, which were traded into by the river St. Lawrence, to their southern, which were accessible by the river Mississippi, they must, in time, become mas­ters of the whole territory; and, by having a wide country to increase in, would soon multiply, and be­come every year more dangerous.

[Page 201] The government of England having long com­plained of these incroachments, determined, at length, to repel force by force, and to cut the knot of nego­tiation, which they could not untie. Orders were dispatched to the governors of the provinces to unite into a confederacy for their mutual security; and, if possible, to bring the Indians over to their cause. The Indians were a fierce savage people, unacquaint­ed with the arts, but from infancy trained to the practice of war. It had long been the method of the English to cultivate their friendship in times of danger, but to slight their alliance in circumstances of tranquility; this, in some measure, served to alie­nate their affections from our government; but the fraud and avarice of our merchants, particularly that called the Ohio company, who sold them bad merchan­dizes, and treated them with equal insolence and perfidy, served to confirm their aversion. Besides, there was something in the disposition of the French settlers in these regions more similar to theirs; the French, like the natives, were hardy, enterprising, and poor; they naturally therefore joined with those al­lies, from conquering of whom they could expect no plunder; and declared against the English colonists, who were rich, frugal, and laborious, and whose spoils they consequently were the more desirous to share.

Thus then the English had not only the French, but almost the whole body of the Indian nations to oppose; yet this confederacy against them did not give a greater union to the different provinces, whose in­terest it was to oppose. Some of the provinces, who, from their situation, had little to fear from the enemy, or little advantages to expect from victory, declined furnishing their share of the supplies, the governors of some other colonies, who had been men of broken fortunes, and had come from their native country to retrieve them by acts of rapacity and oppression [Page 202] here, were so much dreaded, or hated, that they lost all influence in inspiring the colonists with a proper spirit of defence. The ministry, however, at home, began to exert itself for their defence, and their mea­sures were hastened by hostilities already commenced, there having been, for some time, a skirmishing be­tween General Lawrence to the north, and Colonel Washington to the south, with parties of the French, in which the latter were victorious. It would be tedious, as well as uninforming, to relate all the preparations that now began to be made by either party; or to load this account with barbarous names and unimportant marches; or to recount the alter­nate victories and defeats of either side; be it suffi­cient to observe, that they seemed, in some measure, to have imbibed the ferocity of manners of the sa­vage people, with whom they fought, and exercised various cruelties, either from a spirit of reprisal or revenge.

Four operations were undertaken by the English at the same time; one commanded by Colonel Monck­ton, to drive the French from the incroachments they had made upon the province of Nova Scotia; ano­ther to the south, against Crown Point, under the command of General Johnson; a third commanded by General Shirley, against Niagara; and a fourth, still farther to the south, against Du Quesne, under the conduct of General Braddock. In these respec­tive expeditions Monckton was successful; Johnson victorious, though without effect; Shirley was thought dilatory, and his expedition deferred to another sea­son! but the fortunes of Braddock are so extraordi­nary as to require a more ample detail. This Ge­neral was recommended to this service by the Duke of Cumberland, who was justly sensible of his cou­rage, and knowledge in the art of war. These two advantages, however, which, upon other occa­sions, are thought the highest requisites of a Ge­neral [Page 203] were, in some measure, conducive to this com­mander's overthrow. His courage made him obsti­nate; and his skill in war was improper to be ex­erted in a country where there were no regular ad­vances to be made, nor a marshalled enemy to en­counter. This brave but unfortunate man set for­ward upon the expedition in June, and left Fort Cumberland on the tenth, at the head of two thou­sand two hundred men, directing his march to that part of the country where General Washington had been defeated the year before. Upon his arrival there he was informed, that the French at fort Du Quesne expected a reinforcement of five hundred men; he therefore resolved, with all haste, to advance, and attack them, before they became too powerful by this assistance. Leaving, therefore, Colonel Dun­bar, with eight hundred men, to bring up the provi­sions, stores, and heavy baggage, as fast as the nature of the service would permit, he marched forward with the rest of his army through a country equally dan­gerous from its forests and savage inhabitants; a country where Europeans had never before attempted to penetrate, wild, solitary, and hideous. Still, how­ever, he went forward with intrepidity, through the desarts of Oswego, regardless of the enemy's attempts, taking no care previously to explore the woods or thickets, as if the nearer he approached the enemy, the less regardless he was of danger. At length, on the eighth of July, he encamped within ten miles of the fort Du Quesne, which he intended to attack, and the next day resumed his march, without so much as endeavouring to get intelligence of an enemy he de­spised. With this confidence he was marching forward; his soldiers promised themselves a speedy cessation from their harrassing march, and all things seemed to promise success, when the whole army was at once astonished by a general discharge of arms, from an unseen ene­my, [Page 204] along the front and left flank. It was now too late to think of retreating; his whole body had passed into the defile, which the enemy had artfully permit­ted before they attempted to fire. His van guard therefore fell back, in consternation, upon the main body; and the pannic soon became general. The officers alone disdained to fly, while Braddock himself, at their head, discovered the greatest intrepidity, and the highest imprudence; he never thought of retreat­ing, but obstinately continued on the spot where he was, and gave orders to the few brave men who sur­rounded him, to form according to the rules of war, and regularly advance against the enemy. An en­thusiast to the discipline of the field, he desired to bring the spirit of a German campaign into the wilds of Niagara. In the mean time, his officers fell thick about him, while he still continued to issue out or­ders with composure, though he had five horses shot under him, and though the whole body of his troops was fled. At length he received a musket-shot through the lungs, he dropped, and a total confusion ensued. All the artillery, ammunition, and baggage, of the army, were left to the enemy; the General's cabinet of letters also shared the same fate; and the loss of the English, in this unhappy surprize, amount­ed to seven hundred men; and the remainder of the army, some time after, returned to Philadelphia. It was in this manner the expedition of General Brad­dock terminated; from which England had expected such advantages. In all actions, that excite the ap­plause and admiration of mankind, a part of their suc­cess is owing to conduct, and a part to fortune. Of the latter Braddock was totally forsaken; he was unsuccessful; and the ungrateful world are unwilling to grant him the former.

Thus unfortunate were the beginnings of this war, with regard to England; it was resolved therefore, that no measures were now to be preserved with the [Page 205] French; and orders were given to take their ships wherever found, though there was yet no formal de­claration of war. With this order the naval com­manders very readily and willingly complied, so that soon the English ports were filled with ships taken from the enemy, and kept as an indemnification for these forts which the enemy had unjustly possessed themselves of in America. The French complained loudly against the injustice of this proceeding; they represented it to the rest of Europe, as a breach of that faith which should be observed among nations, as a piratical measure, disgraceful to the most savage nation. Their memorials were answered by the English, with some shew of reason. However, it must be owned, that as a declaration of war was a ceremony easily performed, it would have been more consistent with the honour of the ministry, to have pursued the usual methods of contest which had been long established in Europe. The truth is, that the ministry were now divided between peace and war; they saw the necessity of vigorous measures, but they were afraid to throw off the mask of peace intirely. Henry Pelham, who had long guided at the helm of affairs with candour and capacity, had for some time been dead, and his place supplied by Sir Thomas Robinson, who, though a sensible minister, and a favourite of the King, was of no great weight in council, and, consequently, soon under a necessity of resigning; and Mr. Fox was put in his place. The administration was also new formed, in other respects, by the taking in several other new mem­bers. Those who had long been in the ministry, were, it is thought, for peace; those, on the contrary, who were newly taken into the direction of affairs, ex­pected to supplant their rivals by an opposite system, and were consequently for war. The leader of this party, therefore, warmly solicited for war, seconded by the justice of the cause, and the general voice of [Page 206] the people, those who opposed him expected to effect by negotiation whatever arms could atchieve. Whatever might have been the motives for protract­ing the declaration, the French seemed to convince Europe of their moderation upon this attack by sea, by neither declaring war, nor making any reprisals by sea. However, they threatened England with a formidable invasion; several bodies of troops moved to the coasts adjacent to ours; their ministers threat­ened loudly in foreign courts; and such preparations were made as shewed a resolution of carrying the war into the heart of Great Britain. These prepa­rations had the desired effect, filling the nation with consternation, turbulence, and clamour. The people saw themselves exposed without arms, leaders, or dis­cipline, while the ministry were timid, unpopular, and wavering. In this situation the Dutch were applied to for six thousand men, which, by treaty, they were to send England, in case of its being threatened with an invasion. Which demand, how­ever, by affected delays, was put off so long, that the King, unwilling to come to an open rupture with the republic, desisted from it; for which they return­ed his Majesty thanks. Such are the advantages England is to expect, by relying on assistance from any other quarter than its native strength and una­nimity; and every day seems to convince us of the absurdity of political alliances, which are never ob­served, as wanting friendship to bind, or force to compel.

In this timid situation the ministry were eager to catch at any assistance; a body therefore of Hessians and Hanoverians, amounting to about ten thousand, were brought over to protect about as many millions of Englishmen, who, with swords in their hands, were able to defend themselves; but such was the vile complexion of this period, that the whole king­dom presented nothing but one picture of discontent, [Page 207] terror, and distrust of their leaders. The ministry was execrated for having reduced the nation to such circumstances of disgrace, as to be thought to stand in need of preservation from a few German merce­naries; but what could be expected from such a mi­nistry, who were possessed neither of the arts, nor the integrity of government.

However, the French were by no means serious in this intended descent; the only design was to draw off the attention of the English ministry from an ex­pedition which was actually going forward against Minorca, an island in the Mediterranean, which we had formerly taken from Spain, and had been secured to us by repeated treaties. But the ministry of Eng­land were too much infected with the more domestic terror, to take sufficient precautions to guard this place, though they had early notice of the enemies intentions. Instead therefore of sufficiently guard­ing the island with a proper garrison in St. Philip's castle, the citadel, or of detaching a squadron that, in all respects, should be superior to the French fleet in the Mediterranean, they only sent ten men of war upon this service, poorly manned, and indifferently provided, under the command of Admiral Byng, whose character in the navy was by no means established, and orders to reinforce the garrison of St. Philip's with one battalion from Gibraltar; with which command, however, the governor of that place thought it un­safe to comply.

The Admiral sent upon this service reinforced his fleet by a detachment of men at Gibraltar; and, sail­ing towards Minorca, was joined in the way by ano­ther man of war, from whom he learned that Minorca was actually besieged, and the French fleet destined to support the operations by land. He soon knew the reality of this information, when, approaching the island, he saw the French banners displayed, and the batteries opened upon the castle of St. Philip's, [Page 208] which still displayed the English flag. The appear­ance of the French fleet, soon after, still more strong­ly engaged his attention; he drew up his ships in line of battle, and determined to act upon the de­fensive. Byng had been formerly thought to be emi­nent in naval operations, to which he was early bred, but he had hitherto exhibited no proofs of courage. Men are generally most apt to pride themselves upon those talents for which they are most praised; and this was the case with this unfortunate commander; he sacrificed his reputation for courage, to the hopes of being applauded for his conduct. The French fleet advanced; a part of the English fleet engaged; the Admiral still kept aloof, giving prudent reasons for his remissness in coming to action; till, at length, the French Admiral, taking the advantage of the Englishman's hesitation, sailed slowly away to join the van of his fleet, which had been already discomfited. The English, for a while, continued the pursuit; but the opportunity of coming to a close engage­ment was now lost, and never presented itself again.

Byng was still resolved to act with his usual cau­tion; he called a council of war, wherein it was re­presented that he was much inferior to the enemy in ships and men; that the relief of Minorca was im­practicable; and that it was most adviseable to sail back to Gibraltar, which might require immediate protection. This representation was almost unani­mously agreed to, and put accordingly in execution. His pusillanimous conduct, however, soon reached his native country, where it excited almost a phrenzy of resentment. The ministry were also thought to fan the flame, which served to turn the public eye from their own misconduct in sending so weak an armament. Byng, in the mean time, remained at Gibraltar, no way suspecting the storm that was ga­thering over his head; but talked, and wrote, even as if he expected the thanks of his King, and the [Page 209] applause of his countrymen; but he was soon awaked from this dream of infatuation, by a letter from the ministry, giving him notice, that he was recalled; and another soon after, by which directions were given that he should be sent home under arrest; and, upon his arrival in England, he was committed close prisoner in Greenwich hospital. Numberless arts were used to inflame the populace against this unhappy man; and, long before his tryal, several addresses were sent up, from different counties, crying out for justice against the delinquent. The industry of his friends, however, was not remiss upon this occasion; they expostulated with the multitude, and attempted to divert the whole of universal hatred upon the mi­nistry, who, at worst, only deserved a share. But, soon after the news of the surrender of fort St. Phi­lip to the French inflamed the people beyond all mea­sure. This fortress had been reckoned, next to Gi­braltar, the strongest in Europe, the works having been planned by the celebrated Vauban; and, both from the nature of the soil, which was one solid rock, and the peculiarity of the situation, it was thought al­most impregnable. In order to make themselves ma­sters of this important fortress; the French, under the command of the Duke de Richelieu, had landed near twenty thousand men, which, by continual assault, and having, at length, gained an outwork, made themselves masters of the place. The English gover­nor, General Blakeney, however, had very honour­able terms of capitulation, and marched out with all the ensigns of war. Yet, perhaps, in truth, the harder the conditions a garrison is obliged to accept, the more honourable to the commander, as they de­note his extremity in being reduced to accept of them.

The English now saw themselves every-where de­feated; in America their armies were cut in pieces; in Europe their garrisons taken, the people trembling [Page 210] under the dread of an invasion, a few mercenarie [...] brought in for their defence, who, in turn, becam [...] formidable to the natives; all these circumstance [...] concurred to exasperate the people; but there was n [...] object on whom to wreck their vengeance, but th [...] unhappy Byng, who, in a manner, was already de­voted to destruction. War was now proclaimed wit [...] the usual solemnity, though it was now but a denunciation after having struck the blow. The Hanoverians were sent back to their own country, and th [...] preparations were made for trying Admiral Byng i [...] the usual form. On the twenty-eighth day of De­cember his tryal began before a Court-Martial, i [...] the harbour of Portsmouth, where, after a scrutiny of several days, his Judges came to a resolution, tha [...] he had not done his utmost, during the engagement [...] to destroy the enemy, which it was his duty to hav [...] engaged. They therefore unanimously were of opinion, that he fell under the twelfth article of war [...] which positively ordered death to any person, who in the time of action should withdraw, keep back [...] or not come into fight, or who should not do his ut­most, through either motives of cowardice, negli­gence, or disaffection. He was therefore adjudge [...] to be shot on board such ship as the Lords of th [...] Admiralty should please to direct; but his Judges, a [...] the same time, recommended him to mercy; as they could not tell the motives of his keeping aloof. By such a sentence they expected to have satisfied the national animosity against him, and yet to screen themselves from the consciousness of severity. What­ever the government might wish to do is uncertain; but the cry of vengeance was too loud to be disre­garded! his Majesty therefore referred the sentence to the twelve Judges, who were unanimously of opi­nion that the sentence was legal; wherefore the King resolved that he should suffer the extremity of the law. Still, however, there was another attempt made [Page 211] to save him: One of those who had been his Judges at Portsmouth, and was also a member of the house of commons, informed that assembly, that he, as well as some others who had sat upon the Admiral's tryal, desired to be released from the oath of secrecy im­posed upon Courts-Martial, that they might disclose the grounds on which sentence of death had passed upon Admiral Byng, and, perhaps, discover such cir­cumstances as might shew the sentence to be impro­per. To this the house paid little regard; but his Majesty thought fit to respite the execution, till the scruples of the Court-Martial should be more clearly explained. A bill therefore past the house of com­mons for releasing them from their oath; but when it came to be debated among the Lords, and after the members of the Court-Martial were examined touch­ing their reasons, the Peers found no reason for pass­ing the bill; and it was rejected. The Admiral be­ing thus abandoned to the stroke of justice, resolved at least, by the bravery of his dying, in some mea­sure, to shew the injustice of the imputation of his being a coward. He maintained to the last his na­tural serenity; and, on the day fixed for his execu­tion, when the boats belonging to the fleet, being manned and armed, attended this solemnity in the harbour, the Admiral advanced from the cabbin, where he had been imprisoned, to the deck, the place appointed for execution, with a composed step, and resolute countenance. He then delivered a paper, containing the following address: A few moments will now deliver me from virulent persecution, and fru­strate the malice of my enemies. Nor need I envy them a life subject to the sensations my injuries, and the injustice done me, must create. Persuaded I am, that justice will be done to my reputation hereafter. The manner and cause of raising and keeping up the popular clamour and prejudice against me, will be seen through. I shall be considered as a victim destined to divert the indignation [Page 212] and resentment of an injured and deluded people from th [...] Proper objects. My enemies themselves must now thin [...] me innocent. Happy for me, at this my last momen [...] that I know my own innocence, and am conscious that n [...] part of my country's misfortunes can be owing to me. [...] heartily wish the shedding my blood may contribute to th [...] happiness and service of my country; but I cannot resig [...] my just claim to a faithful discharge of my duty, accordin [...] to the best of my judgment, and the utmost exertion of n [...] ability for his Majesty's honour, and my country's servic [...] I am sorry that my endeavours were not attended wit [...] more success; and that the armament under my comman [...] proved too weak to succeed in an expedition of such moment. Truth has prevailed over calumny and falshoo [...] and justice has wiped off the ignominious stain of my personal want of courage, and the charge of disaffection. M [...] heart acquits me of these crimes; but who can be presumptuously sure of his own judgment? If my crime is a [...] error of judgment, or differing in opinion from my judges [...] and if yet the error of judgment should be on their sid [...] God forgive them, as I do; and may the distress of thei [...] minds, and uneasiness of their consciences, which, in justic [...] to me, they have represented, be relieved, and subside, [...] my resentment has done. The supreme Judge sees a [...] hearts and motives, and to him I must submit the justic [...] of my cause. When he had delivered these words, h [...] came forward, and resolved to die with his face uncovered; but, his friends representing that his look [...] might possibly intimidate the soldiers, and preven [...] their taking proper aim, he had his eyes bound wit [...] an handkerchief, and, kneeling upon deck, the signa [...] was given for the soldiers to fire, and he dropped dow [...] dead in an instant.

How far this unfortunate man was innocent, o [...] culpable, we stand too near the transaction to judge [...] if he erred in point of judgment only, it might have deen a proper cause for his dismission; but it would have been cruelty to condemn him for it. Those [Page 213] who plead with the greatest vehemence against him, seem, however, at present, to bring their arguments from the necessity there was of making some one commander an example to give greater resolution to the rest, and from the good effects that seemed to at­tend his execution, by our repeated successes after it. These, however, are such reasons as may silence, but not satisfy; we must be contented therefore, to reflect tacitly upon this transaction, and to let poste­rity do the rest.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXVI.

EUROPE has often been compared to one re­public obeying one law, namely, that of na­tions; and composed of provinces, each of which is prevented from becoming too great by the universal jealousy of the rest. A quarrel therefore between any two of these is apt to involve the whole in war; but, particularly, if the dispute happens to arise between those who are reckoned the leading powers in this assemblage of nations. A war begun between France and England, for a desart and trackless wild in the remote parts of Europe, seemed now spreading fast through the whole world; and the appearance of their commotions revived all the ancient jealousies and claims among the rest.

The French, at the breaking out of this new war, though they were successful at its commencement, were very sensible that they could not long hold their acquisitions against such a superiority as the English were possessed of at sea, and the numberless resources they had of assisting their colonies with all the neces­saries for war. Being therefore apprized that a naval war must, in the end, turn out to their disadvantage, [Page 214] they made no scruple of declaring that they would revenge the injuries they sustained in their colonies, or by sea, upon the King of England's territories in Germany, which they secretly hoped would be a mo­tive to his complying with their demands, or divid­ing the English forces, or draining their finances with heavy subsidies, as they knew his affection for his native country. In these hopes they were not much disappointed; the court of London immediately, to secure the Electorate of Hanover, entered into a treaty with the Empress of Russia, by which a body of fifty-five thousand men should be ready to act in the English service, in case Hanover should be in­vaded, for which the Russian Empress was to receive an hundred thousand pounds annually, to be paid in advance.

His Prussian Majesty had long considered himself as the guardian of the interests of Germany, and was startled at the treaty. This was Frederic III, a Prince adorned with all the arts of peace, and whom you have seen also acting as the most consummate General. He had learned to read men, by being himself bred in the school of adversity; and to love his subjects, by having experienced their attachment. He therefore took the first opportunity to declare, that he would not suffer any foreign forces to enter the Empire, either as auxiliaries or principals. This consummate politician had, it seems, been already apprized of some secret negotiations between the Austrians, whom he looked upon as concealed ene­mies, and the Russians, for entering his dominions, and stripping him of the province of Silesia, which had been conceded to him in the last treaty of peace. His Britannic Majesty, whose fears for Hanover guided his present councils, now saw himself in the very situation he most dreaded, exposed to the re­sentments of France and Prussia, who could at once invade and over-run his Electorate, while his Russian [Page 215] allies lay at too great a distance to assist him. How­ever, all he wished was to keep the enemy out of Germany; and this the King of Prussia made a pro­fession of doing, as well as he. From the similitude of their intentions, therefore, these two Monarchs were induced to unite their interests; and, as they both only desired the same thing, they came to an agreement to assist each other mutually in keeping all foreign forces out of the Empire.

From this alliance both powers hoped great ad­vantages; the preserving the peace of Germany was the apparent good, but each had other peculiar bene­fits in view. The King of Prussia knew the Au­strians to be his enemies, and the Russians to be in league with them against him; an alliance therefore with the court of London kept back the Russians whom he dreaded, and gave him hopes of taking an ample satisfaction from Austria, whom he suspected. As for France, he counted upon it as a natural ally, which, from the long and hereditary enmity with the Austrians, could not, by declaring against him, join them to whom they had such various reasons for political aversion. The Elector of Hanover, on the other hand, had still stronger expectations of the benefits that would arise from this alliance. He thus procured a near and powerful ally; an ally which he thought the French, in their present circumstances, would not venture to disoblige; he counted upon the Austrians as naturally attached to his interests by former services and friendship; and the Russians, at least, as likely to continue neuter, from their former stipulations and subsidy. Such were the motives to this alliance; but both were deceived in every par­ticular. And though this alliance astonished Europe at that time, it soon produced another still more ex­traordinary. The Austrian Queen had long medi­tated designs for recovering Silesia, which, in her exigency, the King of Prussia had invaded, and ex­pected [Page 216] the assistance of Russia to effect her purposes. By this last treaty, however, she saw England joining with Prussia in frustrating her hopes; and, deprived of one ally, sought about, in order to substitute ano­ther in the room. She therefore applied to France; and, in order to procure the friendship of that power, gave up her barrier in the Netherlands, which England had been for ages acquiring with its blood and trea­sure. By this extraordinary revolution the whole political system of Europe assumed a new face, and it pretty clearly shews that events guide the politician, while the politician seldom guides events; or, to use words of Tacitus, there is but very little differ­ence between the art and its futility.

In the mean time, this treaty between France and Austria, was no sooner ratified, than the Empress of Russia was invited to accede to it; which proposal she ardently embraced. By concurring with their proposals, Russia had another opportunity of sending her forces into the western parts of Europe, which was all she had hoped by the subsidiary treaty with England. A settlement in the western parts of Eu­rope was what this fierce northern power long want­ed an opportunity of obtaining; for, possessed of that, she could then pour in fresh forces at any time upon the more effeminate and contending states; and, perhaps, at length, obtain universal Empire. The intrigues of France were also successfully employed with Sweden. A war between that nation and Prussia was kindled up, though contrary to the incli­nation of their Sovereign, who had the natural mo­tives of kindred for being averse to that measure.

Thus all the alliances which England had long been purchasing upon the continent, and many of the treaties which she had been long making, with all the bustle of negotiation, seemed now destroyed. The forces of the contending powers therefore, now drawn out on each side, stood thus: England opposed [Page 217] France in America and Asia; France attacked Han­over on the continent of Europe. This country the King of Prussia undertook to protect, while England promised to furnish him with troops and money to assist his operations. On the other hand, Austria had designs upon Prussia, and drew the Elector of Saxony into the same pursuits; she was also seconded in her views by Russia, Sweden, and France, while the rest of the powers of Europe continued spectators of the contention.

These designs of Austria, for the recovery of her lost dominions, were too apparent not to be early discovered by so vigilant a Monarch as that of Prus­sia; he saw that preparations were making against him by that power in Bohemia and Moravia, while the Elector of Saxony, under the pretence of a mi­litary parade, drew together about sixteen thousand men, which occupied the strong fortress of Pirna. The secret treaty also between the courts of Russia and Austria did not escape his penetration; by this it was privately stipulated, that the treating powers should, in case of apprehending any breach of the present peace, unite against Prussia, and share the dominions of that crown between them. This he considered as an offensive alliance; the treating powers alledged, that it was only defensive. As preparations for war, however, were carrying on with the utmost diligence on either side; the King of Prussia, in order to be confirmed in what he al­ready suspected, ordered his minister at Vienna to demand a clear explication, and proper assurances concerning the preparations he saw making. He at first received an equivocal anwser; but, ordering his minister to demand a categorical reply, whether the Empress Queen was for peace or war; and to re­quire a positive assurance, that she had no intention to attack him that year, or the next; an ambiguous answer was returned to so plain a question, which [Page 218] undoubted manifested an inclination for war. H [...] therefore thought proper no longer to suspend his operations, but to carry the war into the enemies country [...] rather than to wait for it in his own. He entere [...] with a large army into Saxony, and, in the usua [...] strain of civility, demanded from the Elector a pas­sage through that country, which he well knew the possessor of it was not able to refuse. In the mean time, he disguised all his suspicions of the Elector's having secretly treated with his enemies; and, upon the latter's proposing to observe a strict neutrality, the King of Prussia professed himself extremely pleas­ed at the offer; but desired, as a proof of the since­rity of his intentions, to separate the army of the Electorate, for which there could possibly be no oc­casion, in case of the neutrality proposed. This, however, the Elector of Saxony thought it prudent to refuse, which was probably what the other eagerly desired; for, in consequence of his refusal, the King formed a kind of blockade about the Saxon camp, in order to reduce it by famine; for such was the situation of this spot, on which the Saxons had en­camped, that though a small army could defend it against the most numerous forces, yet the same diffi­culty attended leaving it, that served to render it in­accessible to an enemy. Of this his Prussian Ma­jesty took the advantage; and, by blocking up every place of egress, thus cut off their provisions, and the whole body was obliged to surrender prisoners of war.

In a detail of the transactions of England it will not be necessary to recapitulate the numerous marches, victories, sieges, and repulses of this great foreign ally. Whatever either former history had shewn, or even romance might feign, was outdone both by his expedition and intrepidity. King only of a very small territory, assisted by England, whose situation was too remote to give any considerable succours, [Page 219] opposed and surrounded by all the most formidable powers of Europe, he still opposed them on every side; he invades Bohemia, defeats the Au­strian General at Lowoschtch, retreats, begins his second campaign with another victory near Prague, is upon the point of taking that city, but by a teme­rity inspired by former successes, attacking the Au­strians at a disadvantage near Kolin, he is defeated, and obliged to raise the siege: Fortune, says he, has turned her back upon me this day. I ought to have ex­pected it; she is a female, and I am no gallant; success often occasions a destructive confidence; but another time we will do better.

One misfortune seemed to follow another; the Hanoverians, who had joined with him and England, in the alliance, had armed in his favour, command­ed by the Duke of Cumberland. As this army, which consisted of three thousand eight hun­dred men, was greatly out-numbered by the French, they were obliged continually to retire before them. The passage of the river Weser might have been disputed with some hopes of success; yet the Hano­verians permitted them to pass it unmolested. Their army, therefore, was now driven from one part of the country to an other, till, at length, it made a stand near a village called Hastenback, where it was judged they would be best able to sustain the superio­rity of the enemies numbers. However, notwith­standing all the efforts of discipline, and the advan­tages of situation, the weaker side was still obliged to retire; and, leaving the field of battle to the French, retreated towards Stade. By taking this route they marched into a country, from whence they could neither procure provisions, nor yet had an opportunity of attacking the enemy upon equal terms. Unable, by their situation, to retire; or, by their strength, to advance; they were compelled to sign a capitulation, by which the whole army laid down [Page 220] their arms, and were dispersed into different quarters of cantonment. By this remarkable treaty, which went by the name of the treaty of Closter Seven, the Hanoverians were quite subdued, and all the French forces let loose upon the King of Prussia.

The situation of this Monarch was now become desperate; nor could human prudence foresee how he could extricate himself from his distress. The French forces, now united, invaded his dominions on one side; the Russians, who, for some time, had hovered over his dominions in another part, all at once hastened onward to overwhelm him, marking their way with slaughter and cruelty; a large body of Austrians entered Silesia, and penetrated as far as Breslau, and turning to Schweidnitz, sat down be­fore that important fortress, which, after a long siege, surrendered. Another army of the same nation en­tered Lusatia, made themselves masters of Zittau, and pressing forward, laid the capital of Berlin under contribution. Twenty-two thousand Swedes pierced into Prussian Pomerania, took the towns of Anclam and Demmein, and exacted tribute from the whole country. It was in vain that the King of Prussia faced about to every invader, though his enemies fled before him, while he pursued one body, another pe­netrated his territories in the mean time; and his do­minions, even in the midst of victory, were every day contracting. The greatest part were either taken or laid under contribution, and possessed by his ene­mies; and he was left without any alliance or assist­ance, but what the British parliament might think proper to afford.

These succours could, at best, have been, for some time, but ineffectual; however, it was resolved by the English ministry, that something should be done, and accordingly an enterprize was planned against the French coast, which, by drawing off their atten­tion from their German enemies, might give the latter [Page 221] kingdom time to respire, and call off a part of the French to the defence of their own. Beside this in­tention, England also hoped to be able to give a blow to their marine, by destroying such ships as were laid up, or building in the harbour of Rochfort, the city against which this expedition was destined. The English ministry had kept that object of their opera­tions a profound secret; and France was filled with alarms till, at length, it was found that the fleet ap­peared before Rochfort, where it spent some time in deliberating upon what manner to proceed. At last it was resolved to secure the little island of Aix, an easy conquest, which, while performing, the militia of the country had time to assemble, and there was an appearance of two camps upon the shore. The commanders therefore, who, by the badness of the weather, were, at first, prevented from landing, now feared equal danger from the numbers of the enemy which were to oppose them. They took into consi­deration the badness of the coast, the danger of landing, the time the city had to prepare for a vigorous defence, and their own unfitness for any other methods to reduce it but that of a sudden attack. This consideration induced them to desist from further operations; and they unanimously re­solved to return home, without making any attempt. Nothing could equal the discontent of the English upon seeing this expedition, of which they had con­ceived such expectations, return unsuccessful. It pro­duced, as usual, a contest between those who plan­ned, and those who were sent to execute it. The military men represented it as useless and rash; the ministers exclaimed at the timidity and delays of those from whose vigour success was to be expected. A Court of Enquiry censured the commander; but a Court-Martial acquitted him. This, like almost all the former operations, served to embitter party, and increase despondence. A great man was even heard [Page 222] to say, upon a very solemn occasion, that he believed the commanders of every military operation were re­solved upon doing nothing. The tumult of the people was now sunk from turbulent clamour into sullen discontent; they saw only gloomy prospects on every side, their armies destroyed, their fleets unactive, their expeditions ridiculous, and the only ally they had left in Europe, that would fight their battles, upon the point of being overwhelmed by superiority of numbers. Such were the beginnings of this war, from which the timid foreboded national servitude, and a total destruction of all maritime power, and even the most sanguine only hoped for a peace that might restore them to former equality.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXVII.

SUCH was the ill success of the English arms, and of their allies, at the beginning of this war. Every day the press, teemed with productions which either reproached their cowardice, or foreboded their undoing. Yet still the hopes of the parliament rose with their disappointments, and every resource seem­ed to augment with their expences. Tho' the sup­plies for this destructive and hitherto shameful war, were enormous, yet they were raised as soon as grant­ed. The officers of the army seemed roused into vi­gour by the national reproaches. Asia, however, was the country in which success first began to dawn upon the British interest, and where we first learned the art of again conquering the enemy. A war in Europe could not be proclaimed between the two great powers, without being felt in the remotest parts of the globe. This immense tract of country, which was the theatre of an Asiatic war, comprehends the [Page 223] whole peninsula of India Proper. On the coasts of this great territory, the English, the French, and se­veral other powers of Europe, had built forts, with the original consent of the Mogul, who claims the sovereignty of the whole Empire. Whatever his right may be to this dominion, his power is scarce felt or acknowledged in many of the remoter pro­vinces; and even the Governors or Nabobs, who were originally of his appointment, have render­ed themselves independent, and exert an absolute dominion over their respective territories, with­out acknowledging his superiority, either by tri­bute or homage. In the contests of these Prin­ces, therefore, instead of having recourse to the Mogul for redress, they apply to the European powers, whom they can either purchase or persuade to assist them. The war between England and France, in these remote parts, first began by each power's siding with two contending Nabobs, and thus, by degrees, becoming principals in the dis­pute. The success, on each side, for some time after the treaty of Aix la Chapelle, seemed doubtful, till, at length, the affairs of the English seemed to gain the ascendancy by the courage and conduct of Mr. Clive, a gentleman who first entered into the service of the company as a clerk, but soon shewed his ta­lents more adapted for war. By his vigilance and courage the province of Arcot was cleared of the enemy, the French General taken prisoner, and the Nabob, whom the English supported, reinstated in the government of which he had been formerly de­prived. The French, discouraged by these misfor­tunes, and sensible of their own inferiority in this part of the world, sent over a commissary with a view to restore peace; and a convention between the two companies was accordingly concluded, im­porting, that the territories taken on either side since the last peace should be mutually restored; that the [Page 224] Nabobs advanced by the influence of either party, should be acknowledged by both; and that, for the future, neither should interfere in the differences be­tween the Princes of the country. This cessation, however, was not of long duration; compacts made between trading companies can never be of long con­tinuance, when there is a prospect of advantage to either side from their infraction. In a few months after both sides renewed their operations, no longer as auxiliaries but as rivals in arms and commerce. What the motives to this infraction were are not suf­ficiently known; wherever there is trade there must be a degree of avarice; and that is a passion too often the parent of injustice and cruelty. Certain it is that the Viceroy of Bengal, from motives of per­sonal resentment, declared against the English; and, levying a numerous army, laid siege to Calcutta, one of their forts, which was in no situation to endure the attack even of barbarians. It was taken by as­sault; and the garrison, to the number of one hun­dred and forty-six persons, were crowded into a nar­row prison called the Black Hole, about eighteen feet square, without any entrance for air, except by two iron windows to the west, which, by no means, af­forded a sufficient quantity for the supporting life in such numbers. In such a burning climate it is ter­rible to conceive the situation of wretches thus im­mured and suffocating each other. Their first effort, upon finding the danger of their horrid confinement, was to break open the door; but this being impos­sible, they endeavoured to excite the compassion or the avidity of the guard, by offering him a large sum of money for his assistance, in removing them to sepa­rate prisons, with which he was not able to comply, as the Viceroy was asleep, and no person durst dis­turb him. They were now therefore left without all hopes of relief to perish, and the whole prison was filled with groans, shrieks, contest and confu­sion. [Page 225] This turbulence soon after sunk into languor and despair; and towards morning all was horrid silence and desolation. Of an hundred and forty-six who had entered alive, but twenty-three only sur­vived, and of these several died by putrid fevers upon their being set free.

The reduction of this important fortress served to interrupt the prosperous successes of the English com­pany; but the fortune of Mr. Clive still vanquished every obstacle; a fleet, under the command of Ad­miral Watson, conspired with his efforts, and helped him in his victories. Angria, a piratical Prince, who had long annoyed the company's settlements in the neighbourhood of Bombay, first felt the weight of our naval power. This Prince maintained a large number of gallies, with which he would attack the largest ships, when he found a proper opportunity; and, by this means, he exacted a tribute from every European power for a permission to trade. To sub­due such a dangerous enemy to commerce, Admiral Watson and Colonel Clive sailed into his harbour of Geriah, though they sustained a warm fire as they passed, and soon threw all his fleet and his fort into flames. The next day the fort surrendered at discre­tion, where the conquerors found a large quantity of warlike stores, and effects to the value of one hun­dred and thirty thousand pounds.

From this conquest Mr. Clive went on to take revenge for the treatment of the English at Calcutta, and about the beginning of December arrived at Ba­lasore, in the kingdom of Bengal. There was but small opposition made to the fleet, or the army, till they came before Calcutta, the scene of former cru­elty; but as soon as the Admiral, with two ships, arrived before the town, he received a furious fire from all the batteries. This, however, he returned with still greater execution, and, in less than two hours, the place was abandoned. Thus, by the con­quest [Page 226] of this and the former fortress, the English be­came possessed of the two strongest settlements on the banks of the Ganges. Soon after these successes, Hughly, a city of great trade was reduced with as little difficulty, and all the Viceroy of Bengal's store-houses and granaries were destroyed. This barbarous Prince, incensed at these losses, assembled an army of ten thousand horse, and fifteen thousand foot, fully resolved to expel the English out of his domi­nions. Upon the first intelligence of his march, Colonel Clive begged from the Admiral a reinforce­ment of men from the ships; and six hundred sea­men were accordingly soon added to his little army. The numerous forces of the Viceroy of Bengal ap­peared, and Colonel Clive advanced in three columns to attack him. But, though the forces were so seem­ingly disproportioned, with respect to number, the victory soon declared in favour of the English com­mander. In fact, what could the timid Asiatic sol­dier do against European troops, hardened by war, and inured to all the vicissitudes of climate. All the customs, habits, opinions, of the Asiatics tend to enfeeble the body, and effeminate the mind. When we conceive a body of men led up to the attack, dressed in long silk garments, with no other courage but that inspired by opium; with no other fears from defeat but that of changing their mode of slavery; their chief commander mounted on an elephant, and consequently a more conspicuous object for aim; their artillery drawn by oxen, impatient and furious upon the slightest wound; every soldier utterly un­acquainted with that cool intrepidity which provides against danger, and only taught to fight by the same arts that raise their passions. If we consider all these circumstances, it will be no way surprising if one or two thousand Europeans should easily discomfit thirty thousand Indians. And all the heroism of a Cyrus, or an Alexander, in gaining such dispropor­tioned [Page 227] victories, will no longer be the subject of ad­miration.

A victory so easily acquired by a foreign enemy, soon rendered the Viceroy of Bengal contemptible to his subjects at home. His present cowardice render­ed him despicable; his former insolence and cruelty odious. A conspiracy was projected against him by Alikan, his prime minister, and the English having private intimations of the design, resolved to seize the opportunity of seconding it with all their endeavours. Accordingly Colonel Clive marched forward, took the town of Cutwa in his march, and soon came up with the Viceroy's army; and, after a short contest, put the whole to flight, with terrible slaughter. Ali­kan, who had first incited his master to this under­taking, had hitherto concealed his attachments, either through fear or perfidy; but, after this victory, he open­ly espoused the cause of the English, and was therefore solemnly proclaimed Viceroy of Bengal, Bahar, and Oriza, in the room of the former Viceroy, who was as solemnly deposed, and soon after put to death by his successor. The new Viceroy was not insensible of the gratitude he owed the English, for their as­sistance in his promotion. He granted liberally all their demands, satisfied them even to the most ex­tended wish of avarice, and took every method to demonstrate his pride in their alliance.

Yet not the Indians alone, but the French also, submitted to Colonel Clive's assiduity and courage, seconded by the endeavours of the Admirals Watson and Pocock. Chadenagore, a French settlement higher up the river than Calcutta, of great strength, and the most important of any possessed by that na­tion in the bay of Bengal, submitted to the English arms. The goods and money found in the place were considerable; but the chief damage the French sustained was, in the ruin of their head settlement on the Ganges, by which they had long divided the [Page 228] commerce of this part of India. Thus, in one cam­paign, the English, in some measure, became posses­sors of an immense tract of country, superior in wealth, fertility, extent, and number of inhabitants, to many of Europe. Above two millions sterling were paid to the company and sufferers at Calcutta; the soldiers and seamen shared six hundred thousand pounds, and the English forces became too formid­able for resistance. Yet, perhaps, this remote power will, one day, either serve to drain from the mother-country all its useful hands, or our victories will serve to teach the native barbarians to avail themselves of their numbers, and, by being frequently defeated, they will, at last, learn to conquer.

The success of the English was not a little alarm­ing to the French ministry at home; and it is be­lieved that even the Dutch themselves entertained some jealousy of their growing greatness. A consi­derable reinforcement was therefore sent from France, under the command of General Lally, an Irishman, who was reckoned one of the bravest, yet the most whimfical man in the French service. He had been, from his earliest years, bred a soldier of fortune, and carried the military spirit of honour to its utmost li­mits. Under his guidance the French affairs seem­ed, for some time, to wear a better face; he took fort St. David's, plundered a town belonging to the King of Tanjour, in alliance with the English, and after laid siege to his capital. Failing in his design upon this city, he entered the province of Arcot, and prepared for laying siege to Madrass, the chief settlement of our company, upon the coast of Coro­mandel. In the siege of this important fortress, a greater variety of difficulties presented than he had expected. The artillery of the garrison was well ma­naged, while, on the other side, the French acted with the utmost timidity; it was in vain that their commander exhorted them to proceed, though a [Page 229] breach was made, and lay open for fifteen days, not one of them dared to venture out to the assault. Beside this, they were ill supplied with provisions; and the arrival of a reinforcement in the garrison soon after, served to banish all hopes of success. After a brisk fire they raised the siege; and this miscarriage so intirely depressed the ardour of the enemy, that they appeared quite dispirited in almost every ensuing en­gagement. In this manner, therefore, their affairs went on declining, not less by land than by sea. There were several engagements between the two fleets, in which the French, though superior in number of ships and men, always declined a decisive engagement.

But the French were not the only enemies the English had to fear in this part of the world; the jealousy of the Dutch was excited by our repeated success, and the late extension of our power. As this dispute, however trifling it may seem, may, one day, be of greater consequence than it appears at pre­sent, I shall be more particular in my relation of it.

Under a pretence of reinforcing their garrisons in Bengal, the Dutch equipped an armament of seven ships, which was ordered to sail up the Ganges, and render their fort at a place called Chincura so for­midable as to be able to bid defiance to the power of Britain, and thus secure to themselves the trade for salt-petre, which this place afforded. This design, however, Colonel Clive thought incumbent on him, if possible, to defeat; and sending the Dutch com­mander a letter, he informed him that he could not permit his landing, and marching forces to Chincura. To this message the Dutchman replied, that he had no such designs as were imputed to him; and he only beg­ged liberty to land his troops to refresh them; a request which was readily granted. He made these concessions, however, only till he knew that the ships which were to second his operations, were come up the river, and [Page 230] then, throwing off the mask, he began his march to Chincura, and took several small vessels belonging to the English, to retaliate for the affront he pre­tended to have sustained in being denied permission to proceed. Whether, upon this occasion the Cal­cutta Indiaman was sent out to interrupt their pro­gress, or was only pursuing its way homeward, is not clearly known; but certain it is, that the Dutch commander threatened to sink it, if it presumed to pass him. The English captain seeing them point their guns, as if they really resolved to put their threats in execution, returned to Calcutta, where two other India ships lay at anchor, and reported his adventure to Colonel Clive, who instantly or­dered the three Indiamen to prepare for battle. The Dutch fleet were not remiss in advancing to meet them. After a few broadsides, however, the Dutch Commodore struck, and the rest of his fleet followed the example. The victory being thus obtained without any loss to the English, Captain Wilson, who com­manded in the expedition, took possession of the prizes which had greatly suffered, and the crews were sent prisoners to the English fort. In the mean time their land forces, which amounted to eleven hundred men, were totally defeated by Colonel Ford, sent upon that duty by Clive. A considerable part were killed, and the rest were made prisoners of war. During this contest, the Nabob preserved a suspicious neu­trality, ready, as it should seem, to join with the conquerors. Fortune, however, no sooner deter­mined in favour of the English, than he offered them his services, and professed himself ready to demolish the Dutch fortification of Chincura. This contest was represented in very different lights to the re­spective governments at home; the Dutch declaim­ed against the English, oppressing all who at­tempted to trade in the Indies; while the English, on the other hand, reminded the Dutch of their [Page 231] former cruelties, and of their desire of gain, even at the expence of every moral obligation. However, soon after a negotiation ensued; the Dutch wisely gave way to a power they were unable to withstand. A treaty was concluded, and peace was restored, seemingly to the satisfaction of both parties. Such is the present situation of this contest, which, proba­bly, contains the seeds of future dissension. The Dutch will, upon all occasions, think it allowable to increase their power in India to whatsoever pitch they think proper; and the English will ever find it their interest to repel them. It may thus happen, that the amity of the two powers in Europe will not be sufficient to preserve unanimity in so distant a part of the world. In this manner, while Great Britain puts an end to one war, she often lays the foundation for another; for, extended Empire ever produces an increasing necessity to defend it.

Our success against the French on the coast of Coromandel was not less conspicuous; our troops were headed by Colonel Coote, a native of Ireland, a man of prudence and bravery; he marched against General Lally, took the city of Wandewash in his way, reduced Carangoly, a fortress commanded by Colonel O Kenedy; and, at length, came up with the French General, who was equally desirous of the engagement. It is remarkable enough, that the commanders, on either side, were countrymen; but this did not, in the least, abate their attachment to the different crowns they served. In the morning early the French advanced within three quarters of a mile of the English line, and the cannonading be­gan with great fury on both sides; the engagement continued with much obstinacy till about two in the afternoon, when the French gave way, and fled to­wards their camp; which, however, they as quick­ly abandoned, and left their cannon, and the field of battle, to the conquerors. Their losing the city of [Page 232] Arcot was the consequence of this victory; and no­thing now remained to them of all their vast posses­sions in India but Pondicherry, their strongest, larg­est, and most beautiful settlement in that part of the world. This capital of the French Indian power, in the days of its prosperity, exceeded all other Eu­ropean settlements there, in trade, opulence, and splendor; and was still the repository for all the French wealth, which remained after repeated de­feats. As soon as the fortresses adjacent to this im­portant place were reduced, Colonel Coote sat down before it, resolved upon the blockade by land, while Admiral Stevens shut up their harbour by sea. A regular siege was, at that time, impracticable; from the periodical rains which in that climate were soon expected to obstruct such operations. These disad­vantages were even sufficient to repress any attempts whatsoever; but, notwithstanding the inclemency of the climate, the English commander continued be­fore the place for full seven months. Neither rains nor storms were, in the least, able to abate their as­siduity; they continued the siege, and pressed the garrison in such a manner that they were reduced to the most extreme distress. Lally, however, was re­solutely bent on suffering every calamity rather than yield this last stake of French power in India, though his soldiers were obliged to feed on dogs and cats, and even bought such wretched provisions extremely dear, (eight crowns having been given for the flesh of a dog) yet still he determined to hold out. In the midst of this distress, fortune seemed to give an oppor­tunity of relief, had it been properly seconded. In the beginning of January one of those terrible storms which are common in those climates, but of whose violence we can have but little idea in Europe, wreck­ed a large part of the English fleet that was block­ing up the harbour of Pondicherry. This was a blow [Page 233] which once more elevated the hopes of the despairing garrison. The General now flattered himself with the hope of being supplied with provisions; and, once more, animated his soldiers, long sunk with disease, famine, fatigue, and uninterrupted adversity. He immediately wrote to one of the French residents at a Dutch settlement sor instant assistance; his eager impatience appears in the letter he sent. The English squadron is no more, Sir. Of the twelve ships they had in our road, seven are lost, crews and all; the other four dis­masted, and no more than one frigate hath escaped—lose not an instant in sending boats after boats loaded with rice.—The saving of Pondicherry hath been in your power once already; this opportunity neglected, the fault will be all yours. Offer great rewards.—In four days I expect seven­teen thousand Morattoes.—In short, risque all, attempt all, force all, and send us some rice, should it be but half a garse at a time. This singular letter, however, was inter­cepted; and, in less than four days, he had the mor­tification to behold Admiral Stevens again appearing in the harbour, who had repaired his losses with all possible celerity; and the blockade now became as complete as ever. Still, however, he made no pro­posal to surrender; the siege was carried on by his countryman with redoubled alacrity; and, at length, he found his troops half consumed with fatigue and famine, a breach made in the rampart, and not more than one day's provision of any kind remain­ing. He was now reduced to an extremity that would admit of no hesitation; a signal was therefore made to cease hostilities; the principal of the Jesuits, together with two civilians, came out, and offered terms of capitulation. Lally, however, could not be prevailed upon to offer any terms; he sent a pa­per, filled with reproaches, against the English, to Colonel Coote; and alledged, that he would not treat with an enemy upon the honourable terms of war, who had already forfeited his honour in seve­ral [Page 234] instances. He therefore suffered the English troops to take possession of the place, but refused to surrender it in the usual forms. This conquest ter­minated the power of France in India; the whole trade of that vast peninsula, from the Indus to the Ganges, became our own. The Princes of the coun­try knew the English force, and learned to fear it. Since that time nothing considerable has been done against us. Our East-India company have become the arbiters of Empire. The Mogul himself has been defeated, and taken prisoner. The British Em­pire begins to vie even with that of ancient Rome; the extent of its dominions on land is as wide, and its force at sea is infinitely greater. Happy if we know when to bound our successes; happy if we can distinguish between victories and advantages; if we can be convinced that when a nation shines brightest with conquest, it may then, like a wasting taper, be only hastening to decay.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXVIII.

VICTORY, which thus first dawned upon us, from the East, seemed to extend even to Eu­rope and America. But some steps led to these suc­cesses which had been long wished for; and, at length, were effected. The affairs of war were di­rected by a ministry which seemed utterly unequal to the weight and importance of such a charge; they were but feebly held together among each other, and clamoured against by the united voice of the people. It had long been their method to rule by party; and, surrounding the throne, it was said, they attempted only to fill the royal ear with whatever suggestions they thought most to their interests. When any [Page 235] new measure was proposed, which could not receive their approbation; or any new member was introduced into government, whom they did not nominate, it was their method to throw up their places with a se­cret view of resuming them with greater lustre. Thus all hope of preferment was to be expected only from them; public favours were conferred only for private services; they were thought to govern in the senate and in the field; the strength of the crown was actu­ally declining; that of the people was scarce any, while aristocracy filled up every avenue to the throne with pride, ignorance, and faction.

The state of the King and nation, at that time, was truly deplorable; the defeat of Braddock in Ame­rica; the loss of Oswego; the delay of armaments; the absurd destination of fleets and armies, all served to reduce the people almost to a state of desperation, and brought addresses to the throne from every part of the kingdom. The general voice was, at length, too loud not to reach the throne; and the ministry were, at length, obliged to admit some gentlemen into a share of the government, whose talents and integrity might, in some measure, counterbalance their own deficience. At the head of these newly introduced were Mr. Pitt and Mr. Legge; the for­mer of these was appointed Secretary of State, the other Chancellor of the Exchequer. To draw the characters of men still living, would necessarily sub­ject me to the imputation of adulation or satyr; it is enough to say, that the people had high expectations from their abilities; and, in the end, they were not disappointed.

The pleasure of the nation, however, was but of short continuance; a ministry composed of such jar­ring principles could not long continue united, being constituted of persons espousing different measures, and actuated by different motives. The old juncto courted the Sovereign's favour by their pretended at­tachment [Page 236] to his foreign dominions; the new cla­moured against all continental connexions as ut­terly incompatible with the interest of the nation. Both, perhaps, might have been wrong; but it is obvious, that these sentiments were sufficient to sink the latter in the royal esteem; and this dislike was artfully kept up, and increased by their old rivals in power. A few months, therefore, after Mr. Pitt had been put into office, he was obliged to resign the seals, by his Majesty's command; and Mr. Legge was dismissed from being Chancellor of the Exche­quer. The old ministry now thought themselves secure in the unmolested possession of former power; but this very step which they took for their own se­curity turned out to them as unfortunate as those they planned for the public were unsuccessful. The whole nation seemed to rise up as one man in vindi­cation of that part of the ministry that was lately excluded. And the King, at length, thought pro­per to comply with the general solicitation. Mr. Pitt and Mr. Legge were again restored, and a train of successes soon began to dignify their designs.

For some time, however, the measures planned by the former ministry were pursued in America; and though the English were superior to the enemy, yet still they felt all the inconvenience of irresolute coun­cils and ill-planned operations. Our women and children in that part of the world were exposed to the unparalleled cruelty of the Indian savages; and, what is still more remarkable, two thousand Britons with arms in their hands, continued tame spectators of these inhumanities. Bad success ever produces complaint on all sides; and England now heard no­thing but invective and accusation. The Generals sent over to manage the operations of war, loudly accused the timidity and the slowness of the natives, who were to unite in their own defence; the natives, on the contrary, as warmly expostulated against the [Page 237] pride, avarice, or incapacity of those sent over to command them. General Shirley, who was appoint­ed to that command, had been superseded by Lord London; and this nobleman soon after returning to England, three several commanders were put at the head of separate operations; the most important be­ing that designed against Cape Breton, was com­manded by General Amherst. The taking possession of this island, and its fortress, was a conquest great­ly wished by all our colonies, as it had always been a convenient harbour to the enemy, which, from thence annoyed our trade with impunity. It was also a convenient situation for carrying on their fishery; a branch of commerce of the utmost bene­fit to the French nation. The fortress of Louisburg was strengthened with all the assistance of art; the garrison was numerous; the commander vigilant; and every precaution taken to prevent a descent. An account of the operations of a siege is tedious; be it sufficient to say, that the English surmounted every obstacle with the most amazing intrepidity; their former timidity seemed now converted into persever­ing resolution; the place was surrendered by capitu­lation; and our troops, long used to disappointment and repulse began to boast of victory in their turn.

Two other operations were carried on in America at the same time, the one under General Abercrom­bie, against Crown Point and Ticonderago; the other, more to the southward, against fort Du Quesne; the latter expedition was successful; but that against Crown Point and Ticonderago was at­tended with its usual bad fortune. This was now the second time that the English army had attempted to penetrate into those hideous wilds by which na­ture had secured the French encroachments in that remote part of America; Braddock was fallen in the attempt; his rashness contributed to his defeat; and too much caution, perhaps, was the fault of his suc­cessor. [Page 238] Much time was spent in marching to the place of action; and the enemy were thus perfectly prepared to give the English troops a warm reception. They were found intrenched under the fort of Ti­conderago, behind a breast-work raised eight feet high, and still farther secured by felled trees, with their branches pointing outwards. These difficul­ties, however, the English attempted to surmount; but as the enemy, being secure themselves, took aim at leisure; a terrible carnage of the assailants ensued, and the General, after repeated efforts, was obliged to order a retreat. The English army, however, was still superior to that of the enemy, and might, it was supposed, have gone onward with success, if support­ed by their artillery, which had not yet arrived; but the General felt, too sensibly, the terrors of the late defeat, to remain in the vicinity of a victorious ene­my; he therefore reimbarked his troops, and returned to his camp at Lake George, from whence he had taken his departure.

The success of this campaign, however, was, upon the whole, greatly in favour of the English. The taking of fort Du Quesne served to remove from our colonies the terror of the incursions of barbarians, and interrupted that continued correspondence, which by a chain of forts, one part of the French settle­ments had with the other. The ministry too disco­vered a spirit of vigorous resolution hitherto unknown, in this part of the world; and the next campaign promised more brilliant successes.

Accordingly, in the opening of the next session, 1759, the ministry seemed sensible that a single ef­fort carried in such wide extended dominions, would never bring the enemy into subjection; it was there­fore resolved to attack them in several different parts of this extensive Empire at once. It was therefore pro­posed to attack the French in all their places of strength at the same time Preparations were therefore made, [Page 239] and expeditions went forward against three different parts of the northern continent of America. Gene­ral Amherst, commander in chief, with a body of twelve thousand men, was to attack Crown Point that had hitherto been the reproach of the English army. General Wolfe was, at the opposite quarter, to enter the river St. Lawrence, and undertake the siege of Quebec, the capital of the French dominions in this part of the world, while General Prideaux and Sir William Johnson were to attempt a fort near the cataract of Niagara. This last expedition was the first successful. The fort of Niagara was a place of great importance, and served to command all the communication between the northern and western French settlements. The siege was soon commenced by the English, but General Prideaux was killed in the trenches by the bursting of a cohorn; so that the whole success of the expedition fell to General John­son, and his good fortune. He omitted nothing to promote the vigorous measures of his predecessor, but added all his own popularity. The French knew the importance of this fort, and attempted to relieve it. Johnson attacked them with his usual intrepidity and success; in less than an hour their whole army was put to the route, and the garrison, beholding the de­feat of their countrymen, surrendered prisoners of war. Nor was General Amherst less successful, though, without meeting an enemy, upon his march to Crown Point, he found both that fort and Ticon­derago deserted and destroyed. There now, there­fore, remained but one grand and decisive blow to put all North America in possession of the English. This was the taking of Quebec, a city handsomely built, populous, and flourishing. Admiral Saunders commanded the naval part of the expedition; that by land was committed to the conduct of General Wolfe. This young soldier, who was not yet thirty-five, had distinguished himself on many former occasions, par­ticularly [Page 240] in the siege of Louisburg, a part of the suc­cess of which was justly ascribed to him, who, unin debted to family or connexions had raised himself by merit to his present command. The war in this part of the world had hitherto been carried on with ex­treme barbarity; and each side seemed to have adopt­ed the savage manners of the Indians, whose country they disputed. Wolfe, however, disdained these base proceedings, and carried on all the terrors of war with the humanity of a truly civilized European. A description of the siege of this city may instruct a soldier, but can scarcely inform a citizen; be it suf­ficient to observe, that its beginning appeared ex­tremely unpromising to the besiegers; and repeated repulses even served to abate the hopes of the com­mander. I know, said he, that the affairs of Great Britain require the most vigorous measures; but then the courage of an handful of brave men should be exerted only where there is some hope of a favourable event. At pre­sent the difficulties are so various that I am at a loss how to determine. However, he resolved, though now sinking under fatigue and sickness, to make one vi­gorous attempt before he gave up all; and accord­ingly, in the night, part of his troops, with great difficulty made themselves masters of an hill that commanded the town. A battle ensued; Montcalm, the French commander, resolved not to survive the defeat of his country. Wolfe, on the other side, re­solved to conquer or die. Both commanders had their wish; both fell; but the English were victorious. The circumstances attending the death of Wolfe served to give an example like that of the noble The­ban. He, in the beginning of the engagement, re­ceived a wound in the hand, which he dissembled, wrapping it round with his handkerchief, to stop the effusion of blood; he advanced with uncon­cern: a second ball, was more fatal; it pierced his breast, so that, unable to proceed, he leaned on the [Page 241] shoulder of a soldier who was near him. Now, struggling in the agonies of death, and just depart­ing, he heard a voice cry, they run; he seemed to revive a moment at the sound, and, asking who ran, was informed the French; expressing his wonder that they ran so soon, and unable to gaze any longer, he sunk on the soldier's breast, and his last words were, I die happy. Perhaps the loss of such a man was greater to the nation than the conquering of all Ca­nada was advantageous; but it is the misfortune of humanity, that we can never know true greatness till that moment when we are going to lose it.

The surrender of the city was the consequence of this victory, and, with it, the total cession of all Canada. The French, it is true, made, in the en­suing season, a vigorous effort to retake it; but, by the good conduct of our Governour, the town held out till relieved by an English fleet, under the com­mand of Lord Colville. Thus did this campaign make ample reparation for all the losses that had been hitherto sustained by the English. The French had now no force capable of making any resistance; they held out the war now, not with hopes of victory, but honourable capitulation; one place after another was invaded; Montreal, at last, surrendered; and, in a short time, a country, which their own writers have represented as being more extensive than the Roman Empire, fell totally under the power of his Britannic Majesty.

How far the extending dominion tends to the in­creasing the strength of a nation, is an object worthy consideration. The splendour of victory should never dazzle the eye of reason. No people ever could call their country powerful, if it were not populous. For political force depends upon the small frontier to be defended; and the vicinity of an army to every place to be invaded; but extended Empire takes away both these advantages, and, before the soldier [Page 242] can traverse half his proper territories, his country may have already felt all the horrors of invasion. Whatever joy therefore our country might have felt at these immense acquisitions, of remote territory, I own it gives me no very pleasing prospect. The manufactures, the trade, and the riches of these di­stant countries, can never recompence for the conti­nual drain of useful and industrious subjects, that must be derived from the mother country to people them. Wherever the lower sort of people in any kingdom can fly from labour, they will be ready to go; yet, upon the industry, and the valour of these alone, every kingdom must hope for security. Not the effeminate, and the luxurious, can defend their country in the day of battle; they may increase ti­midity by their example, but opulence can never give true relief. The Spaniards and the Portuguese were much more powerful before they divided their strength into all the torrid climates of Southern America. The state thus got riches, but lost men; they had gold, but could not regain industry. Thus are their nations now incapable of defending them­selves against powerful foreign invasion. The im­mense wealth of the Indies that every year comes home to their ports goes to inrich a few; their sub­jects are either in the extremes of wealth or poverty; the rich have only slaves beneath them, who hate those for whom they must labour; the poor have no acquisitions, nor property, to defend; so that their armies are composed either of wretches pressed into the service, who only seek for opportunities not to fight, but to fly; or of men, rich and noble, courageous from pride, yet weak from luxury. Such is not, as yet, the case of England, nor will ever be, if a passion for conquest is not mistaken for national prosperity.

I am, &c.

LETTER XXIX.

THE success of our arms in America was at­chieved by moderate efforts; on the contrary, in Europe the efforts we made, and the operations of our great ally the King of Prussia, were astonish­ing, yet produced no very signal effects. Safety was all that could be expected; and this was secured con­trary to all human expectation. You have just seen that Monarch surrounded by enemies; the greatest and most formidable powers of Europe; you have seen almost the whole power of the continent united against, and hovering over, his devoted dominions; and the only allies that remained to him bound by treaty to retire, and give him no assistance. In this terrible situation he still adhered to his fortitude, and, relying on his natural subjects alone, resolved never to abandon his claims. Such was the desperate condition of his affairs; yet they were still rendered more hopeless, when he was informed that his only friend, the Monarch of that generous people which had hitherto supplied him with money and stores, was going to forsake him, and leave him to irreme­diable ruin. It was thus he expostulated with the doubting Monarch upon this occasion: Is it possible that your Majesty can have so little fortitude and constancy, as to be dispirited by a small reverse of fortune. Are our affairs so ruinous that they cannot be repaired? Consider the step you have made me undertake, and remember that you are the cause of all my misfortunes. I should never have abandoned my former alliances but for your flattering assurances. I do not now repent of the treaty concluded between us; but I intreat you will not ingloriously leave me at the mercy of my enemies, after having brought upon me all the powers of Europe. The French and Imperialists, after a successful sum­mer campaign, were, at this time, which was the depth of winter, sat down to the siege of Leipsic. His Prus­sian Majesty dreaded the capture of this important [Page 244] city, and soon, unexpectedly, seemed to rise up before it. Such was the terror of his arms, even vanquish­ed as he had been, that his approach raised the siege, and the French, though superior in number, retreat­ed. He, at length, overtook them at a village called Rosbach, and gained so complete a victory, that night alone saved their whole army from destruction. The Austrians were, in another part of the Empire, still victorious, and had taken the Prince of Bevern, his generalissimo, prisoner. The King, after a dreadful march of two hundred miles, in the depth of win­ter, came up with them near Breslau, disposed his inferior forces with his usual judgment, and obtained another bloody victory, in which he took not less than fifteen thousand prisoners. Breslau, with a gar­rison of ten thousand men, surrendered soon after, These successes dispirited the enemy, and raised his allies to new hopes.

After the capitulation of Closter-Severn was sign­ed, between the Duke of Cumberland and the Duke of Richelieu, both sides began to complain of in­fractions. The Hanoverians accused the rapacity of the French General, and the insolent brutality of his soldiers; while the French retorted the charge of insurrection against them, and began to think of treat­ing as a conquered enemy those whom they had only bound by treaty as neutrals. Treaties have never been preserved longer than interest or compulsion bound them; political faith is a word without mean­ing; the French oppressed the Hanoverians; the lat­ter resumed their arms; and each side complained, as usual, of infraction. A General was not long want­ing to assemble the collecting army. Prince Ferdi­nand of Brunswic put himself at their head, began by skirmishing with success; and, at last, were in a capacity of becoming formidable to their late victors. From this time the King of Prussia sought the enemy upon more equal terms than ever; often victorious, [Page 245] sometimes repulsed; but ever active and formidable. To name his victories, the towns he took, the dan­gers he escaped, and the losses he suffered, would take up more time than I would chuse to grant to such accounts, or you should bestow. Never was the art of war carried to such a pitch as by him. In this war Europe saw, with astonishment, campaigns carried on in the midst of winter; great and bloody battles fought, yet producing no visible advantage to the victors. At no time, since the days of heroism, were such numbers destroyed, so many towns taken, so many skirmishes fought, such stratagems prac­tised, or such intrepidity shewn. Armies now were considered as composing one single machine, directed by the General, and animated with one will. From the commentary of these campaigns, succeeding Ge­nerals will take their lessons for devastation, and im­prove in the arts of increasing human calamity.

England was, all this time, happily retired from the calamities which drenched the rest of Europe in blood; yet, from her natural military eagerness, seemed desirous of sharing those dangers of which she was only a spectator. This passion for carrying on a continental war, was not less pleasing to the Monarch from his native attachments, than to the people from their natural propensity to arms. As soon as it was known that Prince Ferdinand had put himself at the head of the Hanoverian army, his Britannic Majesty, in a speech at the opening of the session of parliament, observed, that the late successes in Germany had given an happy turn to his affairs, which it would be necessary to improve. The com­mons therefore granted liberal supplies both for the service of the King of Prussia, and for enabling the army formed in the Electorate of Hanover, to act vigorously in conjunction with him. Soon after it was considered, that men would be a more grateful [Page 246] supply than money. The minister who had first come into power and popularity, by opposing such measures, was now prevailed upon to enter into them with even greater ardour than any of his predecessors. The hopes of putting a speedy end to this war, by vigorous measures, his connexions, and, perhaps, the pleasure he found in giving his Majesty pleasure, incited him eagerly into a continental war. It is certain, no minister could more powerfully second a warlike Monarch's intentions; that spirit of enter­prize which had, in a measure, taken birth with his administration, he could now direct at will. The passion for military honour seemed diffused through all ranks of people; and it only wanted a channel in which to flow. In order to indulge this general in­clination, the Duke of Marlborough was sent into Germany with a small body of British forces to assist Prince Ferdinand, where they behaved with bravery, and conspired in promoting that Prince's successes. Each victory they gained, however, only served as a pretext to call over new forces from Britain, while the English ministry were taught to believe that every last battle would be decisive. The battle of Crevelt was fought, in which the Hanoverians and English had the advantage; but it produced no ef­fect. The victory of Minden followed; but laurels seemed to be all that England reaped from the con­quered field. After these two victories it was supposed, that one reinforcement more of British forces would terminate the war in our favour; a reinforcement was therefore sent. The British troops in Germany now amounted to above thirty thousand men, yet no advantage of any consequence was the result of this formidable assistance. War was the trade of some Generals, and, it must be allowed, a gainful trade it was. Let me therefore, here again, pass over this continued repetition of marchings, skirmishes, and [Page 247] rencounters, nor load the page with names of Ger­man Generals, too difficult to be pronounced by an English tongue, and equally grating to a patriot ear. The victories of either side might, in fact, be con­sidered as a compact by which something was to be lost on either side, and no advantage to be acquired. The English, at length, began to open their eyes to their own interest; nor could all the splendours of victory so far blind them, as not to see that they were waging unequal war, and assuming new loads of taxes for conquests they could neither preserve nor enjoy. Such were the growing discontents of the people, when the King, who had inspired these measures, unexpectedly died. On the twenty-fifth day of October, George II, without any previous disorder, was found by his domestic servants, expiring in his chamber. He had arisen at his usual hour, and observed to his attendants, that as the weather was fine, he would walk out. In a few minutes af­ter this, being left alone, he was heard to fall down upon the floor. The noise of his fall brought his attendants into the room, who lifted him into bed, where he desired, in a faint voice, that the Princess Amelia might be sent for; but before her arrival he expired. George II. died in the 77th year of his age, and the 33d of his reign, in the midst of victory; and, at that very period, when the univer­sal enthusiasm of conquest began to subside for more sober reflexions. If any Monarch was happy in the peculiar mode and time of his death, it was he. The factions which had been nursing in his reign, had not yet come to maturity; and all their virulence threat­ened to fall upon his successor. He was himself of no shining abilities; and, consequently, while he was suffered to guide his German dominions, he entrusted the care of Britain to his ministers at home. How­ever, as we stand too near this Monarch to view his [Page 248] real character without partiality, take the following characters of him, by two writers of opposite senti­ments.

‘"As to the extent of his understanding (says one) or the splendour of his virtue, we rather wish for opportunities of praising, than undertake the task ourselves. His public character was marked with a predilection for his native country, to which he sacrificed all other motives."’

On the other hand, says his panegyrist, ‘"On whatever side we look upon his character, we shall find ample matter for just and unsuspected praise. None of his predecessors in the throne of England lived to so great an age, or enjoyed longer felicity. His subjects were still improving under him in commerce and arts; and his own oeconomy set a prudent example to the nation, which, however, they did not follow. He was, in his temper, sudden and violent; but this, though it influenced his behaviour, made no change in his conduct, which was generally guid­ed by reason. He was plain and direct in his in­tentions, true to his word, steady in his favour and protection to his servants; nor parting even with his ministers till compelled to it by the vio­lence of faction. In short, through the whole of life he appeared rather to live for the cultivation of useful virtues than splendid ones; and, satisfied with being good, left others their unenvied great­ness."’

I am, &c.

LETTER XXX.

I Am sorry that praise bestowed on living merit is often found to injure the goodness it applauds. The character of the successor of George the second deserves the warmest panegyric; and all who love their country only wish for a continuance of that spirit, and that virtue which has hitherto appeared in him. Never did Monarch come to the throne at a more critical period; the nation, flushed with con­quest, yet tired of war; expecting the lowest sub­mission from their humbled enemies, yet murmuring under the immense load of their taxes. One part of the people acquiring immense wealth by the conti­nuance of hostilities; another reduced almost to bank­ruptcy. Besides this, he saw the throne hedged round by ignorance and faction, men intent only on their own interests, and willing to persuade Monarchy that whatever conduced to their own wishes was di­rected for the welfare of the kingdom. It was in this disposition of things, that George III. came to the crown. The kingdom began to divide into two parties; or, more properly speaking, the very same individuals seemed to wear, at once, a face of joy and discontent. They felt all the triumphs of their successes, but justly dreaded the consequences of an expensive continuance of them. The numberless victo­ries they gained by sea continued to keep them in spirits, and induced them to supply the immense ex­pences of the year with chearfulness. During the whole period of the war succeeding the execution of Admiral Byng, nothing could be carried on with more spirit and resolution, than all our naval engage­ments. In every enterprize the superior bravery, skill, and dexterity of the English were obvious. Often with forces very much disproportioned, they [Page 250] took their adversaries ships, and effectually disabled the enemies force by sea.

No history can furnish examples of such numerous fleets, or more active commanders. This desire for victory seemed even to diffuse itself to the lowest officers; and the captains of privateers seemed as much enamoured of conquest as with a desire of gain. The Admirals, Hawke, Howe, Boscawen, Pocock, &c. were always victorious; the Captains, Tyrrel, Foster, Gilchrist, Lockhart, and others, often fought at a disadvantage, but never without honour. As an instance of the intrepid spirit of our seamen in this war, I shall mention one action which posterity, if it were only singly supported, might look upon as incredible. The annals of mankind cannot shew an effort of more desperate courage than was exerted under the command of captain William Death, commander of the Terrible privateer. He had, in the beginning of his cruize, made prize of a rich merchant-ship, and with this was returning home to England in triumph, when he had the misfortune to fall in with the Ven­geance privateer of St. Malo, much his superior in force, he having but twenty-six guns, the enemy thirty-six, and a proportionable number of men. The Terrible's prize was soon taken, and converted against her; but, though so unequally matched, cap­tain Death maintained a furious engagement that cannot be paralleled in the annals of any country. The French commander and his second were killed, with two thirds of his company; but much more dreadful was the slaughter on board the Terrible. When the enemy boarded it, they only found one scene of slaughter, silence, and desolation. Of two hundred men only sixteen were found remaining, and the ship itself so shattered as scarcely to be kept above water.

[Page 251] Such were the dear-bought naval victories of France; and such was the obstinacy of the English, even when defeated, that the court of Versailles, at length, seemed to demand peace at any rate. To this request the English were ready to accede, and Plenipotentiaries were sent from either court to ne­gociate so wished-for a reconciliation. France sent to London Mr. Bussy, a man rather skilled in the arts of negotiation than the open integrity becoming the minister of a great nation. England sent over, in exchange, Mr. Stanley, to Paris.

It seemed to be a fundamental principle in this treaty, which, however, proved ineffectual, that each country was to be considered as possessors of their re­spective conquests; and that if any such were to be given up on one side, it was to be only in exchange for such as had been made by the other. Upon these terms it is obvious, that the English were likely to be great gainers by a treaty, as they had taken seve­ral places and dominions from the French, and had lost only Minorca. Whether the French had a real desire to proceed upon such terms is uncertain; however, they soon gave the English ministry suffi­cient reasons to be dissatisfied with their proceedings. Mr. Pitt, who had for a long time been successful, actuated all the English measures, and guided their councils, had ever disdained that pedantry of po­litical refinement, of which others so vainly boast­ed; he negociated therefore in a plain simple man­ner; his guide, sincerity; and his only object, his country's good. Several points were agreed upon between each nation, that gave great hopes that an ac­commodation might speedily be the result. The French agreed to give up all Canada, a fort upon the river Senegal in Africa, and to restore Minorca. The chief objects in debate were, the privilege they claimed of continuing to fish upon the Banks of Newfoundland, and of having the damages repaired which they [Page 252] sustained by the taking of their shipping before a de­claration of war. These two points were warmly negotiated on either side, not without hopes of speedy adjustment, when, unexpectedly, the whole treaty was, at once, set aside by the interposition of the Spanish minister, who desired to have the interests of Spain also included in the treaty. Mr. Pitt very justly con­sidered, that as Spain had no part in the war, so it was impertinent in that power to intermeddle in a treaty of peace; and he regarded this interposition in its true light, namely, that of a confederacy be­tween France and Spain mutually to support each other's interest. Confident therefore of his own in­tegrity, and, perhaps, also too much elated by popu­lar applause, he began to treat the French negotiator with a great share of haughtiness, of which he com­plained to his court at home; and he was soon re­called.

This conduct of Mr. Pitt might have justly in­curred reproach, had he had no private intimations of a secret alliance between France and Spain. The last named power had actually entered into a family compact with France, by which they engaged to car­ry on a war in conjunction. Of all this the English secretary had been previously apprized, and proposed in the privy council to anticipate the designs of Spain by an immediate declaration of war against her. Vi­gour, dispatch, and resolution, characterized all the plans of this minister; he found, however, in the privy council men who were willing to act with more deliberation, and who desired a certainty of offence before they demanded a reparation. Spain, they said, has yet given no certain proofs of their hostile inten­tions; and the English minister at the court of Ma­drid still continues to assure us of their pacific inten­tions. These remonstrances were answered by the secretary, but without producing the desired convic­tion; seeing himself therefore almost singular in his [Page 253] opinion, he was resolved to leave an assembly wher [...] he knew himself maligned; and he threw up the direction of measures, which, to use his own expres­sion, he was no longer allowed to guide. The council was, at that time, divided between two parties, who were both equally pleased at his resig­nation. One part consisted of those who were at the head of affairs during the preceding reign; the other such as had been taken into favour in this; neither were displeased at the removal of a man whose po­pularity threw them into the shade, and whose ve­hemence controlled their moderation. But this po­pular minister's being removed, did not restore una­nimity to the council. The parts which were held together by his presence, now disunited, and a dis­sention began, which still continues to subsist.

The declaration of war with Spain, soon after, shewed how well-grounded Mr. Pitt's measures were, when he proposed a former rupture. However, the union of France and Spain, and the disunion of our own ministry at home, did not seem to retard the progress of our arms. The island of Martinico was conquered by Admiral Rodney and General Monck­ton; the island of St. Lucia surrendered soon after to Captain Harvey; Granada was taken by Briga­dier Walsh; and all the neutral islands submitted to the English dominion. But a bolder blow was struck against the Spaniards; a powerful fleet, and an army of fifteen thousand men, was sent against the Havan­nah, the key of all their possessions in South Ame­rica. It made a noble resistance; but in the end was taken. And now the enemies of Great Britain were humbled on every side; the French left with­out trade or shipping; the source of Spanish oppu­lence interrupted; nothing remained for them, but to ask for peace, upon such terms as we were pleased to grant. A negociation was accordingly once more begun between the three powers, by the intervention [Page 254] of the King of Sardinia's Ambassador; the Duke of Bedford was sent over to Paris, and the Duke De Nivernois came to London; and, at length, the definitive treaty was signed at Paris by the Duke of Bedford, the Duc De Praslin, and the Marquis De Grimaldi, and arrived in London February 19, 1763. In order to purchase peace the French gave up all Canada, their right to the neutral islands, the fort of Senegal, and their right of fishing on the coasts of Newfoundland and the gulph of St. Lawrence, but at a certain distance from shore. Spain also gave up, on her part, the extensive country of Florida; so that the English empire was thus greatly enlarged; and, if we compute its strength by the quantity of land included in its dominions, it can now boast more power than even the great Roman empire.

But no country should build upon remote strength; true power must always subsist at home. When the branches of a large empire become more powerful than the original stem, instead of assisting it's growth, they only overload and exhaust it nourishment. The discontents, therefore, which many have expressed at the conclusion of the late peace, that we did not in­sist upon harder terms, and increase our possessions, were ill founded, since it is probable we are already possessed of more than government can manage. There is ever a certain extent of empire which po­litics are able to wield; beyond this her magnificence is but empty pomp, and her size but corpulence.

A CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF ENGLISH EVENTS.

TABLE I. Of the Saxon Heptarchy.
  A. D.
1.VORTIGERN first King of Kent455
2.Kingdom of the South Saxons con­tained Surry and Sussex, continued one hundred and thirteen years. 
 Ella, first King thereof, and488
 Ethelwolph, first Christian King,
3.Kingdom of the West-Saxons contained what we now call Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, Somerset, Wilts, Berks, and Hampshire, continued three hundred years, began519
 Cherdick, first King thereof, and 
 Hingels, first Christian King. 
4.Kingdom of Northumberland at this time contained the counties of York, Durham, Lancaster, West­morland, Cumberland, and Nottinghamshire, and continued three hundred and seventy-nine years, began to be so527
 Ella and Ida, the first Kings thereof, and 
 Edwin, the first Christian King. 
5.Kingdom of Mercia contained the counties of Ox­ford, Gloucester, Worcester, Salop, Cheshire, Staf­ford, Warwick, Buckingham, Huntingdon, with part of Hertford, Northampton, Rutland, Lincoln, Leicester, Derby, and Nottinghamshire: this king­dom contained two hundred and two years, be­gan582
 Cerdan was first King, and 
 Peada the first Christian King. 
6.Kingdom of the East-Angles contained Norfolk, Suf­folk, and Cambridgeshire: This kingdom conti­nued three hundred and fifty-three years, began775
 Uffa was the first King thereof, 
 Redwald the first Christian King, and 
 Edmond the last King, whom the Danes slew, and he was buried at a village then called Heglisdune, but afterwards (in honour to Edmond) called St. Edmond's Bury. 
TABLE II. Of the chief British princes who contended with the Saxons for their country's right.
  A. D.
1.Vortigern, Vortimer his son, and Aurelius Ambrosius, from 393, to497
2.Uter Pendragon497
3.Arthur, son of Pendragon516
 Buried at Glastenbury542
4.Constantine. son of Cador542
 Buried at Stonehenge. 
5.Aurelius Conanus545
6.Vortiporus578
7.Malgo Conanus581
8.Caractacus586
9.Cadwin639
10.Cadwallo, or Cadwallin, his son635
 Gulielmus and Faustinus archbishops of Canter­bury. 
11.Cadwallador, son of Cadwallo,685
 Buried at St. Peter's at Rome689
 A great pestilence, which lasted eleven years. 

[Page 257]

TABLE III. The most noted Kings of the Saxon heptarchy were
  A. D.
1.Hengist, King of Kent, &c.455
2.Edwin the Great, King of Northumberland626
TABLE IV. The Saxon monarchs.
  A. D.
1.Egbert, crowned at Westminster819
 Buried at Westminster826
2.Ethelwolph, son of Egbert836
 Died at Stanbridge, buried at Westminster857
3.Ethelbert, first Christian King860
 Buried at Sherbourne866
4.Ethelred865
 Died at Willington, buried at Westminster. 
5.Elfred, or Alfred, fourth son of Ethelwolph, anointed at Rome by Pope Leo, and crowned at Winchester872
6.Edward, the elder son of Alfred, crowned at King­ston901
 Died at Farringdon, buried at Winchester924
7.Ethelstan crowned at Kingston924
 Died at Gloucester, buried at Malmsbury940
8.Edmund, fifth son of Edward, crowned940
 Stabbed, and buried at Glastenbury946
9.Edred, sixth son of Edward,946
 Buried at Winchester955
10.Edwy, eldest son of Edmund, crowned at Kingston955
 Buried at Winchester959
11.Edgar, sirnamed the peaceable, crowned at King­ston by Otho959
 Buried at Glastenbury975
 Elsius and Dunstan, Archbishops of Canterbury. 
12.Edward, sirnamed the Martyr, crowned at King­ston, and buried at Shaftsbury.975
13.Ethelred, crowned at Kingston978
 The Danes destroyed by the English, by a secret commission from the King, in every city, on the 30th of November1002
 Ethelred died, buried at St. Paul's,1016
14.Edmund, sirnamed Ironside, crowned at Kingston1016
 Canute, the Dane, besieged London1017
TABLE V. Of the Danes.
  A. D.
1.Canute crowned at London by Livingius1017
 Canute died, and buried at Winchester1035
 Issue, Swein, Harold, and Hardicanute. 
2.Harold, base son of Canute, sirnamed Harefoot, crowned at Oxford1035
 Died at Oxford, buried at Winchester1040
3.Hardicanute crowned at London1040
 He fell down dead at a banquet at Lambeth, and was buried at Winchester1042
TABLE VI. Of the Saxons between the Danes and William the Conqueror.
  A. D.
1.Edward, called the Confessor, crowned at Win­chester, by Edsine Archbishop of Canterbury1042
 He died, and was buried at Westminster1066
2.Harold, son of Earl Goodwin, crowned1066
 William Duke of Normandy landed in Sussex, Sept. 28. 
 He challenged Harold in single combat, Oct. 13. 
 Battle at Hastings in Sussex, Saturday October 14. 
TABLE VII. Of the Normans, &c.
  A. D.
1.WILLIAM the Conqueror crowned1066
 Landfrank, Archbishop of Canterbury1066
 William died at Roan in Normandy1087
2.WILLIAM Rufus crowned1087
 Shot by accident by Sir Walter Tyrrel, Aug. 11100
3.HENRY I. named Beauclerk, crowned at West­minster1100
 Henry died at St. Denys in Normandy1135
4.STEPHEN crowned at Winchester by Corbell, Archbishop of Canterbury1135
 Stephen died at Dover, and was buried at Fever­sham. 
TABLE VIII. The Saxon line restored.
  A. D.
1.HENRY II. called Plantagenet, crowned at Westminster, by Theobald Archbishop of Canter­bury1154
 Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. 
 Henry died, and was buried at Font-Everard1189
2.RICHARD I. crowned at Westminster, by Baldwin, Archbishop of Canterbury1189
 His bowels were buried at Charron, his head at Roan, and his body at Font-Everard1199
3.JOHN crowned at Westminster, by Hubert, Arch­bishop of Canterbury1199
 He surrenders the crown to the Pope's nuncio1199
4.HENRY III. crowned by Magnus, Archbishop of Canterbury1216
 St. Edmund, Archbishop of Canterbury1257
 Baliol college in Oxford founded1263
 Henry died at St. Edmond's-Bury, buried at West­minster1272
5.EDWARD I. sirnamed Longshanks, crowned at Westminster, by Kilwarby1272
 Died of a dysentery, and buried at Westminster1307
6.EDWARD II. of Caernarvon, crowned1307
 John Orford, Archbishop of Canterbury. 
 King Edward resigned the crown to his son1327
7.EDWARD III. crowned eight days after his father's resignation1327
 Now flourished the famous John Wickliffe, of the university of Oxford. 
 Edward married Philippa, daughter of William Earl of Hainault and Holland. 
 Edward died at Sheen, buried at Westminster1377
8.RICHARD II. crowned in the eleventh year of his age1377
 A rebellion in Kent, headed by Wat Tyler and Jack Straw, with upwards of one hundred thousand. 
 Richard charged with the breach of his corona­tion oath, and committed to the Tower by Henry Duke of Lancaster, to whom he resigns the crown1399
 Richard deposed1399
TABLE IX. Of the line of Lancaster.
  A. D.
1.HENRY IV. son of John of Gaunt, third son of Edward III. was crowned at Westminster, by Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury1399
 Gun-powder first invented1400
 A plague at London; upwards of thirty thousand died. 
 King Henry died of an apoplexy, in the forty-seventh year of his age, and fourteenth of his reign; buried at Westminster1413
2.HENRY V. crowned at Westminster1413
 Sir John Oldcastle prosecuted for heresy. 
 Richard Plantagenet's conspiracy1415
 The King lands in Normandy with ten thousand men, and kills sixty thousand at Agincourt. 
 Sir John Oldcastle burned at St. Giles's1418
 The King dies in France, in the thirty-fourth year of his age, and tenth of his reign1422
3.HENRY VI. of Windsor, crowned about the eighth month of his age1422
 Joan Arc beats the English at Orleans1429
 Joan Arc taken, and burned for a witch at Roan1430
 King Henry crowned at Westminster1431
 James Stuart (first of the name) King of Scot­land, murdered by his subjects1447
 Jack Cade enters London, and is killed1450
 King Henry taken prisoner by the Yorkists1460

[Page 261]

TABLE X. Line of York.
  A. D.
1.EDWARD IV. eldest son of Richard Duke of York, crowned at Westminster1461
 King Henry taken in disguise1464
 King Edward marries lady Grey1465
 The Queen crowned at Westminster, and deliver­ed of a daughter named Elizabeth, afterwards married to Henry VII. by which the houses of York and Lancaster were united1466
 King Edward taken prisoner by the Earl of War­wick, &c.1469
 He makes his escape, and obtains a victory over Warwick1470
 King Henry restored by parliament, and Edward deemed a usurper1471
 Prince Henry, his son, killed at Tewksbury, by order of Edward. 
 King Henry stabbed in the Tower by Richard Duke of Gloucester, about the fiftieth year of his age. He was buried first at Chertsey, and afterwards removed to Windsor. 
 Printing (first practised in Germany in 1458) brought to England by William Caxton, mer­cer of London. 
 King Edward died at Westminster, and was buried at Windsor, in the forty-second year of his age, and twenty-third year of his reign1483
2.EDWARD V. succeeded his father, in the eleventh year of his age1483
 Richard Duke of Gloucester, by his insinuations made protector. 
3.RICHARD III. usurped the throne, and crowned at Westminster1483
 He causes his nephews Edward V. and Richard, to be murdered, and buried obscurely in the Tower1484
 Richard killed at Bosworth, having reigned two years and two months1485

[Page 262]

TABLE XI. The families of York and Lancaster united.
  A. D.
1.HENRY VII. grandson of John of Gaunt, fourth son of Edward III. crowned at Westmin­ster, Oct. 30.1485
 Earl of Warwick and famous Perkins executed1499
 A great plague in England1500
 Henry VII's chapel finished at Westminster1502
 King Henry died at Richmond, in the fifty-third year of his age, and the twenty-fourth of his reign, and buried in his chapel at Westminster, April1509
2.HENRY VIII. crowned at Westminster1509
 Princess Mary (afterwards Queen) born Feb. 181516
 Lutheran religion spreads in Germany1517
 King Henry writes against Luther, for which Pope Leo X. gave him the title of Defender of the Faith1521
 Wolsey pushes for being Pope, but is disappoint­ed1522
 The King applies for a divorce from Rome1529
 Wolsey, charged with high treason, is apprehend­ed at York, and dies at Leicester on the road1530
 The King abandons Queen Catharine, and is cited to Rome, but refuses1531
 Dr. Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury, with others, pronounce the divorce of Catharine1533
 The King marries Anne Bullen. 
 The Queen brought to bed of a daughter, named Elizabeth, afterwards Queen. 
 The Pope insists upon Henry living with Catha­rine; but the King and parliament now throw off all subjection to Rome1534
 Bishop Fisher and Sir Thomas Moore executed for denying the King's supremacy1535
 Thomas Cromwel Blacksmith, of Putney, made Vicar-general. 
 Wales united to England by act of parliament1536
 The Bible translated and printed in English. 
 Queen Catharine dies, in the fiftieth year of her age. 
 King Henry jealous of Anne Bullen; and Cranmer divorces her. 
 She is executed in the Tower, May 19. 
 The King marries Jane Seymour, May 20. 
 Queen Jane delivered of a son, afterwards Ed­ward VI. and Jane died the third day1537
 The Bible first read in churches in English1538
 The King marries Anne, sister of the Duke of Cleves, and divorces her in six months, by the instigation of Archbishop Cranmer, &c.1540
 Thomas Cromwel beheaded for treason upon Tower-hill. 
 The King marries lady Catharine Howard. 
 Queen Catharine Howard accused by Cranmer of incontinence, and, without any trial, behead­ed on Tower-hill, Feb. 131542
 The King marries lady Catharine Parr1543
 An act was made, that in case of failure of the issue of Edward his son, the succession to Mary and Elizabeth1544
 King Henry died Jan. 28, in the fifty-sixth year of his age, and thirty-eighth of his reign. 
TABLE XII.
  A. D.
1.EDWARD VI. son of Henry VIII. crowned at Westminster1546
 Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, protector. 
 Popish images burned1547
 Catharine dowager marries Sir Thomas Seymour Lord High-Admiral, and dies in child-bed1548
 Seymour attainted of treason, and beheaded1549
 The protector beheaded1550
 King Edward dies at Greenwich, in the sixteenth year of his age, and seventh of his reign, and buried at Westminster1553
2.MARY, only daughter of Henry VIII.1553
 Lady Jane Grey proclaimed, July 10. 
 Mary proclaimed, July 19. 
 Archbishop Cranmer, Guilford Dudley, and his wife, condemned for high treason. 
 Sir Thomas Wyat beheaded1554
 John Rogers, the first martyr of the times, burn­ed at London; and Bishop Hooper at Gloucester1555
 Bishop Ridley, Latimer, and Archbishop Cranmer, burned. 
 Archbishop Cranmer burned at Oxford, and is succeeded by Cardinal Pool1556
 Calais (having been near two hundred years in the possession of the English) surrendered to the French1557
 The Queen died of a fever, November 171558
3.ELIZABETH succeeded her half-sister Mary by right1558
 Elizabeth crowned, Jan. 15, at Westminster. 
 Mary Queen of Scots married to the Dauphine1559
 The thirty-nine articles of religion established in convocation1561
 The Queen of Scots, married to Henry Stuart (Lord Darnly)1565
 She is brought to bed of a son, afterwards James I. of England1566
 Prince James crowned King of Scotland1567
 Francis Drake returned from his voyage round the globe in about three years1580
 Virginia made an English colony. 
 Tobacco first brought into England by Sir Walter Raleigh. 
 Queen of Scots beheaded at Fotheringhay castle, aged 461587
 Spanish armada1588
 Died of the plague in London 18,0001593
 Prince Charles, afterwards King Charles I. born at Dunferling castle1600
 Earl of Essex forms a design against the Queen, and is executed, Feb. 25, in the Tower. 
 The Queen died at Richmond, March 24, in the seventieth year of her age, and forty-fifth year of her reign, and was buried in Henry VIIth's chapel, at Westminster, April 28.1603

[Page 265]

TABLE XIII. Of the union of the two crowns.
  A. D.
1.JAMES I. of England (and VI. of Scotland) son of Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, and Mary Queen of Scots1603
 King and Queen crowned at Westminster by Whit­gift, Archbishop of Canterbury. 
 King James first styled King of Great Britain1604
 Oath of allegiance first admitted. 
 The Bible translated as now used. 
 Powder plot, Nov. 51605
 Henry Garnet, the Jesuit, confessed his having a hand in the plot, and was executed March 28, at the west end of St. Paul's1606
 Died of the plague this and the preceding year 61, 596. 
 Prince Henry died Nov. 6, aged 19, buried at Westminster. 
 New river water brought to London1613
 Sir Francis Bacon, Lord Chancellor, and George Villers (Baron of Whaddon and Viscount Vil­lers) master of the horse1616
 Charles, the King's second son, (afterwards King) Duke of Cornwall, created Prince of Wales, Nov. 4. 
 Sir Walter Raleigh executed1618
 A match between Prince Charles and Princess Henrietta, daughter of Henry IV, of France1624
 The King died 27th of March, in the 23d year of his reign, and in the 69th year of his age, and was interred in Westminster Abbey, May 17. 
TABLE XIV.
  A. D.
1.CHARLES I. only surviving son of James1625
 His Queen Henrietta Maria lands at Dover, and the marriage consummated at Canterbury, June 13, and arrive at London the 16th. 
 The King crowned at London, Feb. 2. 
 Sir Francis Bacon died April 91626
 The King raises money by sale of the crown lands, &c.1626
 Bishop Laud, Bishop Neale, and the Duke of Bucks, remonstrated against Dr. Lamb, mur­dered by a mob1627
 John Felton hanged in chains for stabbing the Duke of Buckingham, Nov. 191628
 Bishop Laud made Chancellor of Oxford, April 121630
 Charles, afterwards King, born June 27. 
 The King, with Bishop Laud, goes to Scotland, and he is crowned at Holyrood house, June 181633
 Prince James (afterwards King) born and bap­tized at Somerset house, Oct. 15. 
 Archbishop Laud aims at universal conformity, but is opposed. 
 Princess Anne born March 171636
 The Scots enter into covenant against the act of uniformity, the liturgy, &c.1637
 Mary de Medicis, the Queen's mother, arrives in England, Oct. 311638
 The Scots begin the war, and Lesley seizes Edin­burgh, the regalia, &c. Feb. 20. 
 Thomas Viscount Wentworth subscribes twenty, and the Duke of Lenox forty, thousand pounds, to carry on the war against the Scots, Jan. 121639
 Prince Charles, at the age of twelve, takes his seat in parliament1640
 London refuses to lend the King 100,000 l. 
 Scotch army enters England. 
 Lesley beats Lord Conway at Newborn, and the Scots make themselves masters of Newcastle, Durham, &c. and seize the King's magazines, Aug. 27, 28, 29. 
 The long parliament meet Nov. 3. 
 Earl of Stafford committed to the Tower.1640
 The commons vote 300,000 l. to supply the Scots. 
 Bishop Laud committed to the Tower, March 1. 
 Stafford condemned and beheaded on Tower-Hill, May 121641
 The English massacred in Ireland, by Sir Phelim O'Neal, &c. 
 The King's magazines, forts, fleets, &c. seized, Feb. 2. 
 He flies to York, March 19. 
 The King goes to Hull, but is denied admittance by Sir John Hotham1642
 Dover castle seized by the parliament. 
 The Queen lands in Burlington bay in Yorkshire, with money, arms, and ammunition, Feb. 28. 
 Scotch and English army join under command of Lord Fairfax, April 261644
 The battle at Marston-Moor, by the Earl of Manchester, Fairfax, and Lesley. 
 Archbishop Laud is beheaded on Tower-Hill, Jan. 101644
 Fairfax and Cromwell new model the army, April 171645
 Fairfax defeats the King at Naseby, June 14. 
 Fairfax returns to London in triumph, Nov. 12. 
 The Scots deliver the King up to the English, Ja­nuary 301646
 The King taken at Holmby house in Northamp­tonshire, by Cornet Joyce, Feb. 16. 
 The King made close prisoner, Jan. 171647
 Lord Fairfax died at York, March 13. 
 The Duke of York escapes to Holland, April 221648
 The King brought from Windsor to St. James's, January 15. 
 The King brought to a trial, Jan. 27. 
 Murdered, Jan. 30, in the forty-ninth year of the King's age, and twenty-fourth year of his reign. 
TABLE XV.
 A. D.
Cromwell made Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Au­gust 131649
Sets sail for Ireland, Aug. 16. 
He takes Drogheda by storm, Sept. 14. 
Charles II. arrives at Jersey, Sept. 19. 
The Marquis of Montrose hanged1650
The King arrives at Scotland, June 23. 
General Fairfax resigns his commission, June 25. 
The King proclaimed at Edinburgh cross, July 15. 
Cromwell invades Scotland, July 221650
Cromwell passes the Frith, and at Fife kills two thousand Scots, and takes twelve hundred prisoners, July1651
Charles II. enters England by Carlisle, at the head of sixteen thousand men, and is pro­claimed King, Aug. 6. 
At Worcester the King's forces are routed, Sept. 3. 
The Speaker of the house, &c. meets Cromwell at Acton, and conducts him to London in tri­umph, Sept. 12. 
The King arrives at Forscan near Havre de Grace in France, Oct. 22. 
A sea fight, in which Blake beats De Wit the Dutch Admiral, Oct. 28. 
Cromwell goes to the house with a file of mus­queteers, commands the Speaker to leave the chair, April 201653
Cromwell's members chuse Rouse for their Speaker, July 4 and 5. 
Cromwell proclaimed Lord Protector in London, Westminster, &c. &c. December. 
The Queen of Sweden resigns her crown, May 301654
Jamaica taken by Admiral Penn, May 3. 
Spain declares war against England, Feb. 16. 
Cromwell gets a bill passed for renouncing the pretended title of Charles Stuart, Sept. 26. 
The parliament desire Cromwell to be vested with the title of King, April 41657
The officers of the army oppose Cromwell's ac­cepting the title, April 20. 
Cromwell taken ill Aug. 12, and died Sept. 3, after being protector four years, eight months, and eighteen days; aged sixty1658
Richard Cromwell proclaimed Lord Protector, Sept. 4. 
Prince Henry (the King's brother) created Duke of Gloucester, May 131659
Monk marches to London, takes up his quarters at Whitehall, Feb 4. 
The parliament dissolved by act, having sat and continued, in various forms, nineteen years, four months, and thirteen days, March 161659
The city of London, and the fleet, declare for his majesty, May 31660
The King proclaimed in London and Westminster, May 8. 
The King proclaimed in Ireland, May 14. 
The King lands at Dover, and is received by General Monk, May 25. 
The King makes a triumphant entry into the city of London, (being his birth-day) May 29. 
Duke of York made Lord High-Chancellor of England, June 1. 
Regicides executed, from the 10th to the 19th of October. 
Matthew Hale made Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer, Nov. 7. 
The coronation solemnized with great pomp by Archbishop Juxon, April 231661
Miles Corbet, John Okey, and John Barkstead, three regicides, sent over from Holland, April 16, and executed the 19th1662
Princess Mary, eldest daughter to the Duke of York, (married afterwards to William Henry Nassau Prince of Orange) born April 30. 
Dunkirk delivered to the French, Oct. 17. 
Sir Robert Hyde made Lord Chief Justice, Oct. 19. 
An address of both houses to banish all popish priests and jesuits, April 1. 
The city lends his majesty one hundred thousand pounds to support the war against the Dutch, June 21. 
Lady Anne, second daughter to the Duke of York, (afterwards Queen of England) born at St. James's, Feb. 6. 
George Fox (father, or leader of the Quakers) confined in Scarborough-Castle, March 311665
The dreadful fire of London, Sept. 21666
The Dutch sail up the Medway, at Chatham, June 111667
The King laid the first stone of the foundation of the first pillar of the Royal Exchange, Oct. 23, and the Duke of York the first stone of the second pillar, Oct. 31. 
Bridge-Town, in Barbadoes, burnt down, April 231688
The Royal Exchange first opened, Sept. 181669
Blood, and his confederates, apprehended in at­tempting to carry off the crown out of the Tower, May 91671
Tobago, in the West-Indies, taken from the Dutch, December 201672
The test act passes the royal assent, March 291673
Prince Rupert takes the command of the fleet upon the Duke of York's resignation, April 9. 
Prince Rupert beats the Dutch, and forces them into their harbours, April 28. 
Sir Thomas Osborn created Lord High Treasurer, Aug. 15. 
An order of council that no Papist, or reputed Papist, attempt to come to court, June 14. 
George Fitz-Roy, third natural son to King Charles II. (by the Duchess of Cleveland) created Earl of Northumberland, Viscount Falmouth, and Baron of Pontefract, Oct. 31. 
Princess Mary married to the Prince of Orange at St. James's, Nov. 41677
Dr. Tongue, a physician, reports a conspiracy against the King's life and the Protestant re-religion, by the Jesuits, Aug. 111678
Dr. Tongue and Thomas Oates make oath of the plot against the King, before Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, Sept. 6. 
A dispute arises in the house concerning exclud­ing the Duke of York from succeeding to the crown, Nov. 4. 
Ireland, Grove, and Pickering, convicted of the plot (executed 1679) December 17. 
The commons order a bill to disable the Duke of York to succeed to the crown, May 151679
Thomas Whitebread, Provincial of the Jesuits, with Harcourt, Fenwick, Gavan, and Turner, tried and convicted, at the Old Bailey, of high treason, June 18. 
Richard Langhorne, Esq Counsellor, convicted of high treason, as being concerned in the plot, and is executed, July 14. 
Dangerfield committed for high treason, Oct. 27. 
Lord Stafford convicted of high treason, and be­headed, December 291680
His majesty constitutes the Duke of York High Commissioner of Scotland, and to be his re­presentative there, June 221681
Dr. Oliver Plunket, titular Primate of Ireland, and Edward Fitz-Harris, Esq executed at Tyburn, for high treason, July 1. 
Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury committed to the Tower for high treason, papers having been found upon him for excluding the Duke of York, July 2. 
The famous Titus Oates turned out of his lodg­ings at Whitehall, and discharged. 
The Earl of Shaftesbury tried at the Old Bailey, for attempting to exclude the Duke of York; but the grand jury bring it in ignoramus, No­vember 24. 
The supposed plot for assassinating the King at Rye house, in Hertfordshire, discovered, June 12 and 231683
William Lord Russel, and the Earl of Essex, with Walcot, Hone, and Rouse, are convicted of high treason, and sentenced to death, July 13. 
Lord Russel beheaded in Lincoln's-inn-fields, July 21. 
Algernon Sidney convicted of being in the plot, and beheaded on Tower-Hill, Dec. 7. 
The King died at Whitehall in the fifty-fifth year of his age, and the thirty-seventh year of his reign; buried in Westminster Abbey. 
TABLE XVI.
 A. D.
JAMES II. proclaimed King, Feb. 61684
Titus Oates found guilty of perjury1685
The Duke of Monmouth proclaimed King at Taunton, June 20. 
The Duke of Argyle beheaded at Edinburgh, June 30. 
The Duke of Monmouth defeated near Bridge­water, July 6. 
Monmouth beheaded on Tower hill, in the thirty-sixth year of his age, July 15. 
The ecclesiastical commission opened1686
The Bishop of London suspended, Sept. 28. 
The King publishes a declaration for liberty of conscience to all sects, Apr. 41687
The King sends his mandate to Magdalene col­lege Oxon, to elect Mr. Anthony Farmer (a Roman Catholic) their president, April 11. 
The Pope's Nuncio admitted to an audience to their Majesties at Windsor, July 3. 
Father Edward Petre, a Jesuit, sworn of the privy-council, Nov. 11. 
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of St. Asaph, Ely, Chichester, Bath, Wells, Peter­borough, and Bristol, present a petition to his Majesty, desiring him to dispense with the di­stributing and reading the declaration for li­berty of conscience, May 18. 
The Bishops sent to the Tower, June 8. 
The seven Bishops brought to trial, June 29. 
The Prince of Orange sets sail from Holland, Oct. 19. 
The Prince of Orange lands at Torbay, Nov. 1. 
The Prince of Orange arrives at Exeter, Nov. 8. 
Lord Cornbury, Lord Churchill, the Duke of Grafton, and many other Lords join the Prince of Orange, Nov. 22. 
The Prince of Denmark, and the Duke of Or­mond, desert the King, Nov. 24. 
The Queen, and the young Prince, embark for France, Dec. 9. 
The King sends orders to the Earl of Feversham to disband the army, and takes water at White­hall stairs for France, Dec. 10. 
The Prince of Orange arrives at Windsor. 
The King returns to Whitehall, Dec. 16. 
The Prince of Orange issues a declaration for all officers, magistrates, &c. to keep their places (except Papists) till further orders, Dec. 30. 
The Archbishop, and seven other Bishops, fign the association, Jan. 16.1688
The Commons resolve that the throne is vacant, Jan. 31. 
The Lords agree to the same, Feb. 2. 
King James II. reigned three years nine months and eleven days; the throne vacant two months and three days. 
The Princess of Orange arrives at Whitehall, Feb. 12. 
TABLE XVII.
 A. D.
WILLIAM-HENRY and MARY, Prince and Princess of Orange, proclaimed King and Queen with the usual solemnity, Feb. 13. 
Admiral Herbert cruises upon the Irish coast with thirty men of war, Feb. 27. 
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishops of Gloucester, Ely, Norwich, Bath, Wells, and Peterborough, refuse to take the oaths to King William, March 1. 
King William orders sixty men of war to be fit­ted out, March 2. 
King James sails from Brest with a body of French troops to Ireland, March 5. 
The royal Scotch regiment, and Dumbarton's, declare for King James; but they are beat by the Dutch under Ginghle, March 12. 
Prince George of Denmark created Baron of Oak­ingham, Earl of Kendale, and Duke of Cum­berland, with precedence of all Dukes, by act of parliament, Apri. 91689
The King and Queen crowned at Westminster, by the Bishop of London, April 11. 
Lord Chancellor Jefferies died in the Tower, and was buried there, April 18. 
The King invites the French Protestants to Eng­land, April 29. 
War declared against France, May 7. 
An act passes for disarming Papists, May 11. 
The King settles three hundred pounds per Ann. upon Titus Oates for life, May 31. 
King James coins brass money in Ireland, and sets the value of silver upon it, June 18. 
An act for abolishing episcopacy in Scotland re­ceived the royal assent, July 22. 
Princess Anne delivered of a son, who was chri­stened William, and afterwards created Duke of Gloucester, July 24. 
Duke Schomberg sets sail for Ireland with ten thousand land forces, Aug. 12. 
The King gives Dr. Walker five thousand pounds for defending Londonderry so bravely, Aug. 28. 
King William embarks for Ireland the 11th of June. 
A battle upon the banks of the Boyne, July 1. 
The King enters triumphant into Dublin, July 3. 
Sir Thomas Pilkington re-elected Lord-Mayor of London, Sept. 29. 
Dr. John Tillotson, Dean of St. Paul's, conse­crated Archbishop of Canterbury, and suc­ceeded by Dr. Sherlock to the deanery, May 311691
Limerick in Ireland surrendered to the English, which put an end to the wars there, Oct. 3. 
Queen Mary issues a proclamation for a general fast, March 261692
The English and Dutch fleets, under Admiral Russel, totally disperse the French fleet under Admiral Tourville, at La Hogue, May 19. 
An earthquake in England, Sept. 8. 
King William returns to England, Oct. 20. 
The King and Queen go to the Lord-Mayor's feast at Guildhall, Oct. 29. 
King William embarked at Gravesend on March the 31st, and arrived in Holland, April 2.1693
Admiral Rooke, with twenty-three men of war, with the Turkey fleet under convoy, was met off Cape St. Vincent by the whole French fleet under Admiral Tourville; the French took and destroyed twelve English and Dutch men of war, and took about fourscore merchant-men, June 16. 
Hackney coaches licensed and regulated1694
Admiral Russel destroys one large French man of war in the bay of Bartram, and took thirty-five merchant-men, May 11. 
A great fire at Warwick, which burnt down the large church, and nearly three quarters of the town, Sept. 5. 
The King returns from Holland to Canterbury, Nov. 9. 
Dr. John Tillotson, Archbishop of Canterbury, died at Lambeth, in the sixty-fifth year of his age, Nov. 22. 
The Commons vote a supply of four million seven hundred thousand pounds for the ensu­ing year, Nov. 30. 
Queen Mary taken with the small-pox at Ken­fington, Dec. 21. 
Queen Mary died in the thirty-third year of her age, and in the sixth year of her reign, Decem­ber 28. 
WILLIAM III.
An act for rebuilding the town of Warwick, Feb. 11. 
Queen Mary, having lain in state nine weeks at Whitehall, buried in Henry VII's chapel, and a funeral sermon preached for her by Archbishop Tenison, March 5. 
An act for imprisoning Sir Thomas Cook, Sir Basil Firebrace, Charles Bates, Esq and James Craggs, May 3169 [...]
The massacre at Glenco, by the Earl of Argyle's regiment, May 9. 
The Royal Sovereign, the largest man of war, burnt by accident, Jan. 27169 [...]
King James came to Calais, in order to embark for England, with a body of French troops; but Admiral Russel, with a fleet, appearing before Dunkirk, the scheme was prevented, March 2. 
Charnock, King, and Keys, for conspiring against the life of the King, are convicted, and exe­cuted at Tyburn, March 18. 
Sir John Friend and Sir William Perkins are tried and convicted of high treason, in conspiring the King's death, and creating a rebellion, and were executed at Tyburn, Apr. 31696
Brigadier Rookwood, Lowick, and Cranburn, exe­cuted at Tyburn, for being concerned in the assassination plot, April 21. 
The King embarked at Margate for Holland, April 251697
Peace with France proclaimed in London, Oct. 19. 
The King returns to London, Nov. 16. 
A fire at Whitehall which consumed the whole, except the banqueting-house, Jan. 4. 
The Czar of Muscovy came to London, January 11. 
A proclamation for banishing all Popish Priests and Jesuits, &c. Feb. 81699
The King angry with the Commons for their resolutions in settling the affair of the forfeit­ed estates in Ireland, &c. &c. Feb. 21. 
The great seal taken from Lord Somers, and given to Sir Nathan Wright, May 211700
The King of Sweden gains a complete victory over the Muscovites, near Narva, Nov. 30. 
A convocation opened, and Dr. Hooper, Dean of Canterbury, chosen prolocutor, Feb. 11. 
The commons come to a resolution concerning a further limitation of the crown, March 11. 
John Earl of Marlborough made General of the foot, Jan. 11701
King William goes to Holland, July 1. 
King James II. died of a lethargy at St. Ger­maines in France, in the eighty-sixth year of his age, Sept. 6. 
King William concludes an alliance with the Emperor and States-General against France, called the Grand Alliance, Sept. 7. 
The King returns from Holland, Nov. 5. 
An act passed the royal assent for the attainder of the pretended Prince of Wales of high treason; and from this he was called the Pre­tender in common, March 2. 
King William died at Kensington, in the fifty-second year of his age, and fourteenth of his reign, and was buried in Henry VII's chapel in Westminster abbey. 
TABLE XVIII.
 A. D.
Queen ANNE, the only surviving child of James II. by the lady Anne Hyde, eldest daugh­ter of Edward Earl of Clarendon. 
The Earl of Marlborough declared Captain-General of all her Majesty's forces both in England, and abroad, March 15. 
The Earl of Marlborough sent to Holland as am­bassador and plenipotentiary, March 281702
The Queen crowned at Westminster, April 23. 
War declared against France by the Queen, the Emperor, and the States-General. 
The English, under Sir George Rooke, accompa­nied by the Dutch, attack the French fleet, and Spanish galleons, at Vigo in Gallcia, Oct. 12. 
John Earl of Marlborough created marquiss of Blandford and Duke of Marlborough, Decem­ber 14. 
Captain Kirby and Captain Wade shot at Ports­mouth, for betraying and deserting Admiral Benbow in the engagement with Du Casse, Apr. 61703
Sir Cloudesley Shovel arrives in Lisbon river, Sep­tember 1. 
Charles III. King of Spain, arrived at Spithead, and went to Windsor, Dec. 26. 
The English and Dutch forces, under the com­mand of Scomberg and Fagel, arrive at Portu­gal, April 231704
King Philip declares war against the King of Portugal, and against King Charles III. and his allies, Apr. 30. 
The confederate fleet, under the Prince of Hesse, land a large body of troops in the bay of Gi­braltar, and attacked that place July 21, and it surrenders July 24. 
An engagement between Sir George Rook and the French, Aug. 13. 
The Emperor creates the Duke of Marlborough Prince of the Empire, Aug. 28. 
The French and Spaniards besiege Gibraltar, Oct. 22. 
Admiral Leake sailed for Lisbon with forces for Gibraltar, and arrive there, Nov. 9. 
The Duke of Marlborough returns to England, Dec. 14. 
The Duke receives the thanks of both houses of parliament for his great services, Dec. 14. 
An act for prohibiting all trade with France, March 16. 
An order of council, by which the Dutch have liberty to trade with France notwithstanding the act, March 19. 
King Stanislaus crowned King of Poland, Oct. 201705
The Duke of Marlborough embarks for Holland, to open the campaign, April 101706
The French and Spaniards lay siege to Barcelona, May 1. 
The Duke of Marlborough obtains a complete victory over the Elector of Bavaria and Mar­shal Villeroy, at Ramillies, May 12. 
The Marquis das Minas, and the Earl of Gal­way, took possession of Madrid, (capital of Spain) and Charles III. was, (on the 27th) proclaimed King, June 24. 
Prince Eugene passes the Po in order to relieve Turin, July 6. 
Articles of Union between England and Scotland, signed by the commissioners of both kingdoms, July 22. 
George Augustus, electoral Prince of Hanover, cre­ated Baron of Tewksbury, Viscount Northaller­ton, Earl of Milford-haven, Marquis and Duke of Cambridge, Oct. 5. 
An act for settling the honour and dignities of John Duke of Marlborough upon his posterity, annexing the manor of Woodstock and house of Blenheim, to go with the said honours, Dec. 21. 
The French and Spaniards intirely defeat the confederates at Almanza, April 141707
King Charles III. of Spain proclaimed at Naples, July 31. 
The first parliament of Great Britain met, Oct. 23. 
The Duke of Marlborough levels all the French lines between Ypres and Lys, and put all Pi­cardy under contribution, July 261708
Sir John Leake arrives before Cagliari, the ca­pital of Sardinia, and the whole island de­clares for Charles III. of Spain, Aug. 12. 
The island of Minorca, with the commodious harbour of Port-Mahon, taken by General Stanhope, and made to pay obedience to Charles III. of Spain, Sept. 30. 
The town of Lisle taken, Oct. 23. 
Ghent surrendered to the Duke of Marlborough, Dec. 30. 
Prince Eugene, the Duke of Marlborough, and the Marquis de Torcy, met together at the Hague, to settle preliminaries of peace, May 81709
The Pope, at last, acknowledges Charles III. to be King of Spain, June 7. 
Dr. Henry Sacheverell's noted sermon preached before the Lord-Mayor and Aldermen, at St. Paul's, Nov. 5. 
Dr. Sacheverell brought before the house, Dec. 15. Robert Walpole, Esq made treasurer of the navy, Jan. 13. 
The trial of Dr. Sacheverell, Feb. 27. 
The Duke of Ormond declared Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Oct. 81710
The Abbot De la Bourlie stabs Mr. Harley, at the Cockpit, Feb 28. 
The commons resolve, That fifty new churches should be speedily erected, in and about Lon­don and Westminster, April 61711
The Duke of Marlborough turned out of all places, posts, or employments, Dec. 30. 
Robert Walpole, Esq expelled the house. 
The Duke of Ormond constituted Captain Ge­neral of all her Majesty's forces in Great Bri­tain, Jan. 1. 
Robert Walpole, Esq committed to the Tower for corrupt practices. 
A suspension of arms declared between Great Britain and France, for four months, Aug. 271712
The Dutch refuse a cessation of arms, Sept. 30. Articles of peace signed at Utrecht, March 301713
Peace proclaimed with great solemnity at Lon­don, May 5. 
Dr. Atterbury created Bishop of Rochester, July 5. 
Spain, by the treaty of peace signed at Utrecht, acknowledges the Protestant succession, and yields Gibraltar, Minorca, and Port-Mahon, to Great Britain, &c. July 13. 
The fortification of the harbour, and also the citadel of Dunkirk, intirely demolished, April 261714
Her Majesty taken very ill, July 29. 
Died, Aug. 1. 
Queen Anne died in the fiftieth year of her age, and the thirteenth year of her reign. 
TABLE XIX.
 A. D.
GEORGE I.
George, Elector of Brunswick and Lunenburgh, succeeded to the crown, Aug. 1. 
The Duke of Marlborough made a triumphant entry into London, Aug. 4. 
King George I. proclaimed at Edinburgh, Aug. 5. 
The King proclaimed at Dublin, Aug. 6. 
Queen Anne's remains privately interred in West­minster Abbey by order of the King, Aug. 24. 
King George arrived at Greenwich, Sept. 18. 
The Duke of Ormond removed from being Cap­tain General, Sept. 20. 
King George crowned at Westminster, Oct. 20. 
An order issued by his Majesty, prohibiting the clergy to meddle with any state affairs in their sermons, Dec. 11. 
Prince of Wales chosen Governor of the South-Sea company, Feb. 18. 
The Duke of Ormond retires to France, Aug. 6.1715
Lewis XIV. King of France, died, Aug. 20. 
The hon. James Murray joined the Earl of Marr, Oct. 4. 
The Earl of Derwentwater, the Lord Viscount Kenmure, with the Earls of Nethisdale, Carn­wath, and Winton, join with Mr. Foster, with two hundred Scotch horse, Oct. 19. 
General Willis and General Carpenter attack the rebels, Nov. 13. 
The principal prisoners brought to London, Dec. 9. 
The Pretender lands at Peterhead near Aberdeen, Dec. 25. 
The Pretender makes his public entry into Perth, Jan. 10. 
Orders of council for executing the Earls of Derwentwater and Nithisdale, and Lord Vis­count Kenmure, Feb. 24. 
Colonel Oxburgh executed at Tyburn, and his head set upon Temple-Bar, May 141716
Richard Gascoigne, Esq executed at Tyburn, May 25. 
Thomas Forster escaped out of Newgate, and Pitt the keeper indicted for it, July 6. 
Prince Eugene gains a complete victory over the Turks, near Peter-Waradin, Aug. 5. 
The Czar of Moscovy comes to Holland, Dec. 30. 
The Duke of Newcastle made Lord Chamberlain of his Majesty's houshold, and his brother Colonel Pelham, Vice-Chamberlain, April 201717
Prince Eugene gains a complete victory over the Turks, near Belgrade, Aug. 5. 
Charles XII. King of Sweden, killed at Frede­rickshall, Nov. 301718
War declared against Spain, Dec. 16. 
Baron Gortz beheaded at Stockholm, Feb. 20. 
The Pretender arrived at Madrid, was met by the Duke of Ormond, and received there with all honour and respect, March 261719
The French invade Spain by land, April 10. 
Her Grace Erengard Melosina, Duchess of Mun­ster, created Baroness, Countess, and Duchess of Great Britain, viz. Baroness of Glastenbury, Countess of Feversham, and Duchess of Ken­dal. 
The King embarked for Holland, May 9. 
Arrives at St. James's, from Hanover, Nov. 13. 
The King embarks at Greenwich, for Holland, Apr. 151720
The King gave orders, that all such of the di­rectors of the South-Sea company as were in, or had any employment under the crown, should be immediately discharged his service, Jan. 11. 
Mr. Robert Knight stopped, by order of the mar­quis Deprio, at Tirlemont, and committed pri­soner to Antwerp castle, Feb. 
Sir John Blount, chief projector of the South-Sea bubble, sent for, but refuses an examination. 
Colonel Charles Churchill sent to Vienna, in his Majesty's name, to the Emperor, that he would be pleased to deliver up Mr. Knight, prisoner in the castle of Antwerp, Feb. 13. 
The right hon. Robert Walpole, Esq made Chan­cellor and Under-treasurer of the Exchequer, and Henry Pelham, Esq one of the Commis­sioners for executing the office of Treasurer, Apr. 21721
An act for granting the people called Quakers, a form of affirmation, removing the difficulties they objected to relating to taking an oath, Feb. 12. 
Great rejoicings on account of dissolving the septennial parliament, March 13. 
Princess Amelia and Carolina inoculated for the small-pox, Apr. 171722
John Churchill, Duke and Earl of Marlborough, died at Windsor, June 13. 
Christopher Layer, Esq and Charles Earl of Or­rery, and William Lord North and Grey, com­mitted to the Tower for high treason, Sept. 20, 28, 29. 
Lewis XIV. of France, crowned at Rheims, Oct. 15. 
The Bishop of Rochester sent to the Tower, April 241723
The King embarks for Holland, June 3. 
Philip V. King of Spain, resigns his crown to his eldest son, Don Lewis, Jan. 4. 
Pope Innocent XIII. died, Feb. 25. 
Henry Pelham, Esq made secretary at war of all his Majesty's forces in Great Britain, March 281724
A severe edict published in France against the Protestants, May 14. 
Dr. Henry Sacheverell died, June 5. 
Mr. Wood had a patent for coining Irish half-pence, July 24. 
Thomas Parker, Earl of Macclesfield, impeached of misdemeanors, May 61725
Thomas Parker, Earl of Macclesfield, paid his fine of thirty thousand pounds, and released from the Tower, July 22. 
The Spaniards invest Gibraltar, and open the trenches before it, Feb. 221726
Sir Isaac Newton, Knt. died, in the eighty-fifth year of his age, March 23. 
George I. King of Great Britain, Elector of Bruns­wick Lunenburgh, &c. died at Osnaburg in Germany, being in the sixty-eighth year of his age, and thirteenth year of his reign, June 101727
TABLE XX.
 A. D.
George II. proclaimed King the 27th of June1727
Duke of Newcastle and Lord Townshend, secre­taries of states; Sir Robert Walpole, Chancel­lor of the Exchequer. 
Arthur Onslow, Esq chosen speaker, January 23, 1727-8. 
The Spaniards continue their depredations in America, Jan.1728
His Majesty purchases Carolina for 800,000 l.1729
The excise scheme on wines and tobacco brought into the house, March 141733
The Princess of Wales delivered of a Prince the 24th of May, who was christened George, our present most gracious Sovereign1738
Admiral Vernon took Porto-Bello, Nov. 51739
Lord Cathcart and Admiral Vernon take Fort Charge from the Spaniards, March 241740
His Majesty takes the part of the Queen of Hun­gary against the King of Prussia. 
The Spnniards invade Georgia, and are repulsed1742
The Earl of Stair sent into Flanders. The bat­tle of Dettingen, June 161743
The unsuccessful engagement off Toulon, be­tween Admiral Mathews's fleet and the com­bined squadrons of France and Spain1744
Admiral Anson returns from his voyage round the world. 
Charles VII. dies1745
War declared against France, March 10. 
The battle of Fontenoy, April 30. 
The Chevalier lands in Scotland, July 27. 
Enters Edinburgh, Aug. 17. 
Defeats Sir John Cope, Sept. 21. 
Takes Carlisle, Nov. 15. 
The battle of Falkirk, Jan. 17. 
The decisive victory over the rebels at Culloden, April 15. 
An unsuccessful attempt against Port l'Orient1746
Anson and Warren intercept the French fleet, May 301747
The battle of Val, June 21. 
The general peace by the treaty of Aix la Cha­pelle proclaimed at London, Feb. 221749
Forts erected at the back of the British settle­ments in America1752
Attempts to seize Nova Scotia1754
Boscawen sent to protect that province1755
Braddock defeated, July 9. 
Hessians called over to defend the English1756
Minorca taken. 
War declared against France, May 17. 
Canada conquered1759
King George II. dies, Oct. 25, aged 77, after a reign of 34 years1760
TABLE XXI.
 A. D.
Our present Sovereign George III. succeeds to the throne, October 25. 
His nuptials solemnized, Sept. 111761
His coronation, September 22. 
Preliminary articles of peace signed at Fontain­bleau, November 3. 
FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.