The case of the barbers of London Barbers' Company (London, England) 4 600dpi bitonal TIFF page images and SGML/XML encoded text University of Michigan Library Ann Arbor, Michigan 2012 January 004795115 T20153 CW107998945 K029870.000 CW3307998945 ECMS 0135203300

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

The case of the barbers of London Barbers' Company (London, England) 3, [1] p. ; 2⁰. s.n., [London : 1745?] A protest of the Barbers' Company against the proposed dissolution of their union with that of the surgeons. Reproduction of original from the British Library. English Short Title Catalog, ESTCT20153. Electronic data. Farmington Hills, Mich. : Thomson Gale, 2003. Page image (PNG). Digitized image of the microfilm version produced in Woodbridge, CT by Research Publications, 1982-2002 (later known as Primary Source Microfilm, an imprint of the Gale Group).

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.

eng Barbers -- Labor unions -- England Surgeons -- England London (England) -- History
THE CASE OF THE BARBERS of LONDON.

THE Barbers of London were a Fraternity before the Time of Edward the Second, and by Letters-Patent of Edward the Fourth were made a Body Corporate, and inveſted with ſeveral Powers and Privileges. In the 32d Year of Henry the Eighth, the publick Policy thought proper to unite them with another Company (not then incorporated) called the Surgeons of London, in order, (as is moſt probable) to transfer thoſe Powers and Privileges to the latter, without directly appearing to wreſt them from the former to whom they had been originally granted.

This Coalition of the two Companies having now ſubſiſted above Two Hundred Years, the Barbers are ſurpris'd to find an Attempt made by the Surgeons to diſſolve it, by Authority of Parliament, without their Participation or Conſent.

The principal Reaſons aſſigned by the Surgeons, in their printed Caſe, to induce the Legiſlature to this extraordinary Act of Power, are,

That the Barbers, in the Time of Henry the Eighth, were all Surgeons, and that the Parliament, by uniting them with others of ſuperior Abilities, intended their Improvement in that Profeſſion; but that they having, long ſince, ceaſed to intermeddle with any Branch of Surgery, this Intent of the Act is fruſtrated, and the laudable Purpoſe of the Union at an end.

That by this Alteration of the Circumſtances of things, the Junction of the two Companies (how advantageous ſoever in former Times) is now become highly inconvenient.

That the Surgeons, if diſtinctly incorporated, would be encouraged to meet and communicate to one another their Experiments and Succeſſes.

That the like Separation has taken place at Paris, Edinburgh, and Glaſcow.

BUT the firſt of theſe Reaſons is grounded on a Miſtake in point of Fact; for tho' it be true that the Barbers were all originally Surgeons, and incorporated as ſuch, yet long before the Union in queſtion, moſt of them had quitted the actual Exerciſe of that Profeſſion, and the Right itſelf of exerciſing it in virtue of their Charter, had been 3 H. 8. Ch. 11. No Perſon within the City of London, nor within ſeven Miles, ſhall occupy as a Surgeon, except he be firſt examined, approved, and admitted by the Biſhop of London or Dean of St. Paul's. taken away by Parliament: And tho' in the Preamble of the uniting Act, both Companies are ſtiled Surgeons, yet from the 32 H. 8. Ch. 42. Sect. 3. No Perſon within the City of London, Suburbs of the ſame, and one Mile Compaſs of the ſaid City, uſing any Barbery or Shaving, ſhall occupy any Surgery, Letting of Blood, or any other Thing belonging to Surgery, Drawing of Teeth only except. Enacting Part (which expreſly reſtrains the Barbers from occupying any part of Surgery, except Tooth-drawing) it is evident the Legiſlature did not conſider them as real Surgeons, nor could intend their Improvement in a Science they were forbid to practiſe, ſo that the Circumſtances of Things are not altered from what they then were, or from what they manifeſtly were deſigned to be; and therefore the Barbers having no Relation to the Surgeons, or their Art (as it was then deemed no Objection to their Union) annot now, with any Propriety, be inſiſted on as a Reaſon for their Separation.

With regard to the Inconveniencies complained of, as the Charge is general, this general Anſwer only can be given, That the Barbers have always, with the greateſt Deference, ſubmitted to the Surgeons in all Matters peculiar to them, and chearfully contributed, out of their common Stock, towards every Expence which they have declared neceſſary for the Honour or Advancement of their Profeſſion. And ſince none of theſe Inconveniencies have been of Conſequence enough to deſerve being particularly pointed out, we may venture to pronounce them inconſiderable, and unworthy the Attention and Redreſs of Parliament; and the rather, as all of them put together, have not prevented the Surgeons of London from carrying the Improvement of their Art, both in Speculation and Practice, to a greater Height than has been done in any other Place or Nation.

That the frequent Meetings of ingenious Men, and their free Communications on the Subject of their Profeſſion, may tend to the Benefit of Mankind in general, and to the Honour of their Country in particular, is not denied: But ſurely the Conſtitution of the united Company is no obſtacle to theſe laudable Purpoſes. The Barbers have for many Years, at their Monthly Courts, ſubmitted to withdraw at a ſtated Hour, and reſigned the Parlour to the Surgeons: And if this Condeſcenſion is not ſuppoſed to afford them ſufficient Time for Converſation on theſe particular Days, nothing hinders them from holding ſeperate Aſſemblies at the Hall almoſt every other Day in the Year.

As to what is ſaid to have been done at Paris, Edinburgh, and Glaſcow, no particular anſwer can be given, unleſs it appeared by what Means, for what Reaſons, and upon what Terms the Separations in thoſe Places were brought about. In London there are but two Inſtances of Separations of Companies, viz. that of the Feltmakers from the Haberdaſhers in 1604, and that of the Apothecaries from the Grocers in 1617; but both theſe were effected by mutual Conſent, without the Intervention of Parliament; and it may be proper to obſerve, that the Feltmakers miſcarried in a former Application for an excluſive Charter in 1576 for want of the Haberdaſhers Conſent.

Upon the whole, therefore, the Barbers humbly hope the forgoing Reaſons will be deemed inſufficient to induce the Legiſlature to deſtroy an Union they themſelves thought proper to form, an Union which two hundred Years Exiſtence has rendred venerable, and which, by the Improvements above-mentioned, appears to have anſwered all the Purpoſes for which it was eſtabliſhed.

But if for other Reaſons (which the Surgeons ſay may be given) the Parliament ſhall be inclined to favour them in this part of their Requeſt; the Barbers, from the ſcrupulous Regard and Tenderneſs which that Auguſt Aſſembly has always ſhewn for private Property, cannot but hope they ſhall be continued in the Enjoyment of all their preſent Poſſeſſions, without any Diviſion whatſoever, and that, for the following Reaſons:

Becauſe moſt of the united Company's Lands and Tenements, (particularly the Site of their Hall, Parlour, &c.) originally belonged to them, and by the uniting Act 32 H. 8. Ch. 42. The united Company ſhall have, poſſeſs, and enjoy, to them and their Succeſſors for ever, all ſuch Lands and Tenements, and other Hereditaments whatſoever, which the ſaid Company or Commonalty of Barbers have and enjoy, to the Uſe of the ſaid Myſtery and Commonalty of Barbers of London. ſeem with great Juſtice to have been intended to remain to their ſole and ſeparate Uſe, tho' in fact the Surgeons have hitherto been indulged in the equal Enjoyment of them with the Barbers.

Becauſe the Surgeons Share of what may have been acquired ſince the Union, will ſcarce be an adequate Recompence to the Barbers for the above Indulgence, much leſs for the unmerited Loſs of a Brotherhood now ſo honourable and advantageous to them.

Becauſe the Expences of the Barbers when diſtinctly incorporated, can fall but very little, if any thing, ſhort of thoſe of the united Company, ſo that a Reduction of Income muſt ſubject them to very great Difficulties, which (conſidering that they neither deſire, nor have given the Surgeons juſt Cauſe to deſire a Separation) would be extremely hard and unreaſonable.

Becauſe the preſent flouriſhing Condition of the Surgeons, (the only real Alteration in the Circumſtances of Things) will ſufficiently enable them to ſupport the Dignity of their new and favourite Inſtitution with becoming Splendor, without diſtreſſing their leſs happy Brethren the Barbers.

THE CASE OF THE BARBERS of London.