This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.
SIR Chriſtopher Wren, and Baptiſt May Eſquire, were choſen by the Mayor and Select Burgeſſes only, not exceeding Thirty.
Sir Charles Porter, and William Adderley Eſquire, by the General Burgeſſes and Inhabitants, paying Scot and Lot; who doubt not but to prove, that the Right of Election is in the general Burgeſſes, and conſe
In the Years
Reſolved, That all the Inhabitants in general, and not the Special Burgeſſes only, have the Right of Electing Members to ſerve in Parliament.
That ſome latter Returns are by the Mayors, Bayliffs and Burgeſſes, and under the Common Seal.
That makes nothing againſt Us, every Inhabitant being a Burgeſs by the Charter of Ed. 4th, and moſt Returns where there is a Mayor, being under the Common Seal, tho' they Chuſe by the Inhabitants at large. Edw. 4.
That Two Judgments of Parliament, viz. in the Years 1660 and 1688, are in favour of the Mayor and Select Burgeſſes.
To the Firſt of theſe Judgments we Anſwer, That the Reſolution in the Year 1660; was occaſioned by one Starkey's miſlaying the Records of thoſe Returns abovementioned, as appears by the Report of the Committee, 1679. 1679.
As to the Second, We conceive the Caſe in 1688. was grounded upon Neceſſity, the Perſon that conteſted the Right then being Speaker of the Houſe, and hope neither of theſe Judgments ſhall be able to ſet aſide an undoubted Right, proved by ſo many Ancient Returns, and ſetled further by Three Reſolutions, againſt which there can be no Objection.
They were not form'd into a Select Number not exceeding Thirty, till King James the Firſt's Reign, which ſhews the Ancient Right of Election cannot poſſibly be in them.
That if the Select Burgeſſes ſhould be admitted to have the ſole Right, then in Caſe their Corporation were Diſſolved, either by Surrender or Forfeiture of their Charter; the Town of Windſor could ſend no Burgeſſes to Parliament, which would be againſt all Reaſon.