A BRIEF (Yet full) ACCOUNT OF THE DOCTRINE OF Vulgar and Decimal FRACTIONS. WITH A Specimen of their Demonstrations. By WILLIAM ALINGHAM, Teacher of the Mathematicks.

LONDON, Printed; Sold by Mr. Mount at the Postern on Tower-Hill, Mr. Lea, Globe-maker in Cheapside. Mr. Worgan, Mathe­matick-Instrument-maker, under St. Dunstan's Church in Fleetstreet; and by the Author, at his House in Channel-Row, Westminster, 1698.

THE PREFACE.

Reader,

THou art here presented with a short Treatise of Vulgar and Deci­mal Fractions, Quantities of such great and general Use, that without the Knowledge of them there can be no Com­pleat, or Correct Accomptant.

I have therefore in this Critical Age adventnr'd to present the Publick with this small Tract, in which I have en­deavoured to be Methodical and Plain, and to digest the Rules in such Order, with several Exemplications of the same, [Page]that I hope they will be rendred intelli­gible, and serviceable to the meanest Capacity.

Lastly, I have added a Specimen of the Demonstration of each particular O­peration: All which to the Ingenious I willingly present, hoping of their favour­able Acceptance; and that they may re­ceive some Benefit from the same, is the hearty Wish of their real Friend

W. Alingham.

THE DOCTRINE OF Vulgar Fractions.

What a Fraction is, and how read.

AN Unite, or Integer, is one whole thing, as, one Pound, one Yard, one Gallon, one Hour, &c.

A Fraction, or broken Number, is a part, (or parts) of an Unite, or Integer; and is generally represented by two Numbers set one over the other, with a Line between them, thus, ½. ⅔. ¾. 5/7, &c. The upper number is termed the Nu­merator; the lower the Denominator, they are read, or pronounced, thus, ½ is one half, ⅔ is two thirds, ¾ is three fourths, 5/7 is five sevenths, and so of any other, naming the Numerator first, and the Denominator last; the Denominator [Page 2]shewing the parts into which the Unite, or Integer, is broke, and the Numerator, the part, (or parts) of the Denominator that is to be taken, or used.

Of the Varieties of Fractions.

OF Fractions, or broken Numbers, there are four sorts, viz. Proper, Improper, Mixt and Compound.

A proper Fraction is, that whose Nume­rator is lesser than the Denominator, as ½. ⅔. ¾. ⅘. &c.

An Improper Fraction, is, that whose Numerator is greater than (or, at least e­qual to) the Denominator, as 4/3 5/2 6/6 4/4 &c.

Mixt, are whole Numbers and Fracti­ons set together thus, 2⅓, 3⅚, 7¾, &c.

Compound Fractions are known, by ha­ving the word [Of] betwixt them, and are written thus, ⅔ of ¾, also ¼ of ⅚ of ⅞. They are likewise called Fractions of Fra­ctions.

Now before we can pass to the Rules of Addition, Substraction, Multiplication and Division in Fractions, they must be pre­par'd, and made fit for such Operation, and this preparation is perform'd by Re­duction, of which there are five kinds, as follows,

Reduction the First.

TEacheth how to reduce a whole, or mixt Number, into an Improper Fraction, which Fraction shall be equal in value to the said whole, or mixt Num­ber: And contrary, that is, it teacheth to turn an improper Fraction into its Equi­valent whole, or mixt Number.

CASE I. If it be a whole Number, the Rule is, multiply it by the assign'd Denominator, seting the Product there­of for a Numerator over the said Deno­minator, so shall this Fraction be equal to the given whole Number.

Example. Reduce 7 into an Improper Fraction, whose Denominator shall be 4.

[...]

Note, That these two Lines =is the sign of Equality, as 7 =28/4 shows that 7 is equal to 28 Fourths.

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 5
  • 8
  • 9

into a Fraction, whose Denom. is

  • 4
  • 6
  • 7

CASE 2. If a mixt Number is given to be reduc'd, the Rule is, multiply the whole Number by the Denominator of the Fraction, adding thereto its Numerator, the Sum shall be a new Numerator which, if set over the old Denominator will give a Fraction of the same value with the pro­pos'd mixt Number.

Exam. Reduce 2¾ into an Improper Fraction.

[...]

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 3 5/7
  • 6 2/3
  • 5 4/9

into an Improper Fraction.

CASE 3. If an Improper Fraction is to be reduced into its Equivalent whole, or mixt Number; the Rule is, divide the Numerator by the Denominator, so will the Quotient give a whole Number equal to the Fraction given.

Exam. Reduce 28/4 into its Equivalent whole Number.

[...]

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 20/4
  • 48/6
  • 6 [...]/7

into its Equivalent whole Numb.

If after dividing any thing remain, set it for a Numerator over the Fractions Denominator, and join the said Fraction to the Quotient.

Exam. Reduce 11/4 into its Equivalent mixt Number.

[...]

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 26/7
  • 20/3
  • 49/9

into its Equivalent mixt Numb.

This Reduction is absolutely necessary, for there is no working with whole Numbers and Fractions, till the whole Numbers are turn'd into Fractions.

Reduction the Second.

TEacheth you how to reduce a com-Fraction to a Simple one, which shall have the same value with it.

RULE.

Multiply all the Denominators one in­to another continually, and set the Pro­duct thereof for a Denominator; so like­wise multiply all the Numerators one in­to another, and set the Product for a Numerator over the former Denominator, the Fraction thus form'd is Equivalent to the given compound Fraction.

Example,

Reduce ¾ of 8/9 of 9/12 to a simple Fraction.

[...]

Reduce

  • 4/5 of 5/6 of 8/9
  • 3/6 of 6/7 of 7/9
  • 32/35 of 7/8 of 10/12

to a simple Fraction

This Reduction is likewise absolutely ne­cessary, for there is no working with Com­pound Fractions, and others, till the said Compound are reduc'd to Simple.

Reduction the Third.

TEacheth how to abreviate a Fraction, or to find a Number that shall re­duce it to its lowest Terms at one Oper­ation, yet still keeping the same value it had at first.

RULE 1st.

Divide the Numerator and Denomina­tor (if they be both even) by 2.4.6.8. &c. (If the Numerator and Denominator be one even, and the other odd, then try some odd Number, as 3.5.7.9. &c.) that will divide both without a remainder; repeat this Division as often as you can, so shall the last Quotient of the Numera­tor be a new Numerator, and the last Quote of the Denominator, a new Denominator.

Example.

Reduce 216/432 into its lowest Terms.

[...]

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 160/270
  • 216/378
  • 2240/3360

into its lowest Terms.

But the general way of reducing a Fra­ction to its lowest Terms, is, to find a Common Measurer, that is, the greatest number, which will divide the Numera­tor and Denominator without a Remain­der, by which means a Fraction is brought to its lowest terms at the first work: For finding of which the Rule is,

RULE 2d.

Divide the Denominator by the Nu­merator, and if any thing remain by it, divide the former Divisor, and if after this division any thing remain, divide the last divisor by it: Proceed thus till nothing remain, so shall the last Divisor be the greatest common Measurer, and is a Number that will divide both Numera­tor and Denominator without a Remain­der, and so reduce the Fraction to its lowest terms at one Operation: But, if after all the Divisions are ended there temains one, then is such Fraction in its lowest terms already.

Exam. Reduce 216/432 to its lowest Terms.

[...]

So that 216 is the common Measurer, and is the greatest Number that will di­vide the Numerator and Denominator without a Remainder. See the work

[...]

After this method you may try the Examples given, in the first Rule of this Reduction.

This Reduction is also very useful, for by it Fractions that are express'd by great Numbers, are made to be express'd by smal­ler, so that their true value is more easily and readily known.

Reduction the Fourth.

TEacheth how to bring Fractions of divers denominations into Fractions of one denomination, yet still retaining the same value.

RULE.

Multiply all the Denominators conti­nually one into another, and set the pro­duct thereof for a new Denominator; then multiply the Numerator of the first Fraction into all the Denominators, ex­cept its own, the product is the Nume­rator of the first Fraction, and must be [Page 10]set over the Denominator before found. So likewise for the second Fraction you must multiply its Numerator into all the Denominators, except its own, the pro­duct is the Numerator of the second Fra­ction. Proceed thus with the rest of the Numerators, that is, Multiply each Nu­merator by all the Denominators, except its own, seting the several Products for new Numerators over the common De­nominator first found, so shall these new Fractions be of one denomination, and e­quivalent to the former.

Example.

Reduce ⅔ and 4/7 and ⅚ into one Denomina­tion.

[...]

So that

  • 2/3 = 84/126
  • 4/7 = 72/126
  • 5/6 = 105/126

More Example.

Reduce

  • 2/5 & 1/7 & 5/6
  • 3/7 & 1/2 & 5/8
  • 3/2 & [...]/5 & 7/9

into one denomination

Note 1st.

If mixt Numbers are given thus to be reduc'd, reduce only the fractional parts.

Note 2d.

If compound Fractions are to be re­duc'd to one Denomination, they must first be brought to simple ones by Redu­ction the Second.

This Reduction is also highly necessary, for before Fractions are brought to the same De­nomination, they neither can be Added, nor Substracted.

Reduction the Fifth.

TEacheth how to alter, or change, a Fraction into another equal in va­lue that shall have any assign'd Deno­minator.

RULE.

Multiply the Numerator of the Frac­tion by the assign'd Denominator, and divide the Product by the old Denomi­nator, the Quotient is the Numerator to the intended Denominator.

Example.

Reduce 84/126 into a Fraction, whose De­nominator shall be 3.

[...]

More Examples.

Reduce

  • 84/210
  • 48/112
  • 135/360

into a Fraction that shall have

  • 5
  • 7
  • 8

for a Den.

Note, If a compound Fraction is thus to be reduc'd, then by Reduction 2d. turn it to a simple, and then work as the pre­ceding Rule directs.

How to find the value of a Fraction.

This Reduction is the most useful of all others, for by it the value of any [Page 13]Fraction is found in the known parts of Coyn, Weight, Time, &c. And contrary, that is, any part of Coyn, Weight, Time, &c. is turn'd into a Fraction; the method of doing which is as follows,

Multiply the Numerator by the parts of the next inferior Denominator, that are equal to an Unite of the same, that the Fraction gives the parts of; the Product divide by the Denominator, the Quote gives the value in the parts you multi­ply'd by: If after this Division any thing remain, multiply it by the next inferior Denomination, dividing the Product by the Denominator, as before. Thus proceed, till you can bring it no lower, so will the several Quotients give the required value of the given Fraction.

Example 1st.

What's the 6/8 of a Shilling.

[...]

But if when it be brought to the low­est Terms any thing remain, place it [Page 14]for a Numerator over the former Deno­minator.

Example 2d.

What's the 17/19 of a Pound sterling.

[...]

Example 3d.

What's the 5/9 of a Pound weight, Averdu­poize.

[...]

After this method may the value of any Fraction be found (whether it be of Coyne, Weight, Time, Liquor Measure, Long Measure, &c.) and given in known and familiar Terms, as in the second Ex­ample, where the value of 17/19 of a Pound sterling was required. I answer, that it is 17 Shillings 10 Pence Half-penny, and 18/19 of a Farthing. So likewise in the third Example, where the 5/9 of a pound weight Averdupoize was required; there I an­swer, that it was 8 Ounces, 14 Drams, and 2/9 of a Dram.

How to turn any part of Coyn, Time, Weight, &c. into a Fraction.

THis is but the Converse of the for­mer, and therefore (from a little consideration of what foregoes) may be easily effected: For if you do but consider that 1 Shilling is the 1/20 of a Pound sterling, and 1 Penny the 1/12 of a Shilling, and 1 Farthing the ¼ of a Pen­ny: The Names of a Shilling, a Penny, and a Farthing, being only Denominati­ons given them, for the Vulgar in our Nation to know them by, the more uni­versal way of expressing them, being to call a Shilling the 1/20 of a Pound, and a Penny the 1/12 of a Shilling, also a Far­thing the ¼ of a Penny: And this way of expressing them (supposing the value of the Pound known) would be intelliga­ble to all Nations that have the know­ledg of Numbers; so that if it were re­quir'd to know what part of a Shilling 9 d. is, I answer, that 'tis 9/12, or when abreviated ¾. In like manner, if it were required to know what part of a pound 4 Shillings, it is evident that 'tis 4/20 or ⅕. But if it were requir'd to know what part of a Pound 1 Penny is, here I must [Page 17]consider that 1 Penny is the 1/12 of 1/20 of a Pound, and therefore if by Reduction the 2d. I reduce it to a simple Fraction, 'twill be 1/240 of a pound Sterling, so a Farthing is ¼ of 1/12 of 1/20 of a pound, and therefore the 1/960 of a pound: Lastly, if it be required to know what part of a Pound 13 s. 5 d. ¼ is, then reducing all into Far­things, it gives 645; and likewise find­ing the Farthings in one pound which is 960, and seting the former over the la­ter fraction-wise gives 645/960, the part of a pound that 13 s. 5 d. ¼ is.

After the same manner may any part of Weight, Time, Measure, &c. be expres­sed Fraction-wise.

Some Examples, with their Answers.

What's the 13/14 of a Pound sterling. Answer, 18 s. 6 d. ¾ q. 3/7.

What's the 6/7 of a Guinea at 22 s. Answer, 15 s. 8 d. ½ q. 2/7.

What's the ⅜ of a Pistole at 17 s. 10 d. Answer, 6 s. 8 d. ¼.

What's the 2/9 of a pound Weight Aver­dupoize. Answer, 3 Oun. 8 Dr. 8/9.

What's the 6/7 of a Year, at 365 days. Answer, 312 days, 20 hours, 34 min. 2/7.

What part of a Pound sterling is 2 s. 9 d. Answer, 33/249.

What part of a pound Averdupoize is 11 Ounces 2 Drams ¼. Answer 713/1024.

What part of a Year is 29 days, 14 hours. Answer, 710/8760.

The reason of this Reduction is very evident, for in a given Fraction suppose ⅔, such proportion as the Denominator 3 has to its Numerator 2. such proportion has any assign'd Denominator, suppose 6, to a Numerator corresponding to it, so that stating the Question according to the Rule of Three, viz. If 3 give 2, what shall 6 give, and then as is directed multiplying the second term 2, which is the Numera­tor, by the third term 6 the assign'd Deno­minator, dividing the product by the first term 3 the old Denominator, you get 4 for the Quotient, which is a new Nu­merator to the assign'd Denominator.

'Tis by this Reduction we turn a Vulgar Fraction to a Decimal, & contra, also by it all the Decimal Tables are calculated, of which more shall be said when I come to treat of Decimals.

Addition of Vulgar Fractions.

IF the Fractions to be added have not like Denominators, they must be re­duc'd to a common Denominator by Re­duction [Page 19]the 4th. Then add the Numera­tors together, and set the Summ for a Numerator over the common Denomina­tor, so shall the Fraction thus found be the Summ of the given Fractions.

Example.

What's the Summ of ⅔ and 5/7.

[...]

Observe if the Fraction that is the Summ of those two given, happen to be an Impro­per Fraction, then by Reduction the 1st. Rule the 3d. reduce it into its equiva­lent whole, or mixt Number as in the last Exam.

More Examples.

What's the Summ of

  • 4/9

What's the Summ of

  • 4/7
  • 6/9

Note 1.

If you are to add mixt Numbers, add only the fractional parts, being first reduc'd to a common Denominator by Reduction the 4th.

Note 2.

If compound Fractions are to be add­ed one to another, or to simple Fracti­ons, then such Compound Fractions must be reduc'd to simple ones (by Reduction the 2d.) and those again to one Denomi­nation by Reduction the 4th.

Note 3.

If the Fractions to be added are not parts of the same whole, but the one parts of a Shilling, the other of a Pound, then (by Reduction the 5th.) they must be brought to one Name, or Denomina­tion, i. e. both must be made parts of the same whole.

As for Example.

What's the Summ of ⅗ of a Pound, and ⅔ of a Shilling.

Here they are not only of different demominations, but parts of different Wholes, and therefore is more properly worded thus,

What's the Summ of ⅗ and ⅔ of 1/20 of a Pound sterling. Answer, 190/300.

Substraction of Vulgar Fractions.

THE Rules delivered for reducing and making Fractions fit for Addition, are in all respects and cases to be ob­serv'd in Substraction; so that whether they are Mixt, Compound, or simple ones, they must be reduc'd to a common Denominator; then take the Numerator of the Substractor, or Fraction, to be Substracted, from the Numerator of the Substrahend (or Fraction from which we are to Substract) and set the remainder over the common Denominator, so is this new Fraction the remainder or difference sought.

Example.

From 1 8/21 or 29/21 substract ⅔.

[...]

More Examples.

From 38/45 Substract 4/9.

From 201/315 Substract ⅗.

Multiplication of Vulgar Fractions.

IF they be simple Fractions to be Mul­tiply'd. Then Multiply the two Nu­merators, together, for a Numerator, and the two Denominators for a Denomina­tor, so shall the Fraction formed by these two Numbers be the product Required.

Example.

Multiply ⅝ by ⅘.

[...]

More Examples

  • Multiply 7/9; by 8/11.
  • Multiply ⅚ by 2/7.
  • Multiply ⅘ by ¾.

Note 1st.

If mixt Numbers are to be Multiply'd then before you can Multiply them they must be Reduc'd into Improper Fractions by Reduction the 1st. Rule the 1st. and 2d.

Note 2d.

If they be Compound Fractions, Re­duce them to simple ones.

Note 3d.

If a whole Number is to be Nultiplyed by a Fraction, then make the whole Number an Improper Fraction by setting one under it.

Division of Vulgar Fractions.

IF the Fraction to be divided, and also the Fraction by which we divide, that is, Dividend and Divisor, be both simple Fractions, then Multiply the Numerator of the Dividend by the Denominator of the Divisor, and set the product for a Numerator; multiply also the Denomi­nator of the Dividend, by the Numera­tor of the Divisor, and take the product for a Denominator; the Fraction thus form'd is the Quotient.

Example.

Divide 20/40 by ⅘.

[...]

More Examples.

  • Divide 56/99 by 7/9.
  • Divide 10/42 by 2/7.
  • Divide 12/20 by ⅘.

Note 1st.

If either Dividend, Divisor or both, be whole or mixt Numbers, reduce them into Improper Fractions, by Reduction the 1st. Rule 1st. or 2d. and then divide according to the preceding Rule.

Note 2d.

If they be Compound Fractions re­duce them to simple ones by Reduction the 2d.

The Rule of Three Direct in Fractions.

THE Directions given, both for stat­ing and working Questions in the Rule of Three in whole Numbers, holds also in this of Fractions; so that having framed your Question, as is there direct­ed, 'tis but Multiplying the Fractions in the 2d. and 3d. place together, and di­vided the product by the first, according [Page 25]to the preceding Rules given for Multi­plying and dividing of Fractions, the Quotient is the Answer to the Question.

Example.

If ⅔ of a Yard of Cloath cost 5/7 of a Pound, what Cost 7/8 of a Yard at that Rate.

[...]

Proof.

[...]

More Examples.

If 8/9 of a pound Troy cost 5/7 of a Gui­nea, at 22 s. What shall 9/11 of a pound cost. Answer 405/616. or 14 s. 5 d. ½ 22/77.

If ⅘ of a pound Troy cost 3/7 of a No­ble, What will 14/15 of a Noble buy. An­swer. 392/225 or 1 pound 167/225.

If 7/12 of an Hundred weight cost 34 s. 2/14, What will 19 Hundred weight ¾ cost. Answer 453144/392 or 1155 384/392.

Note 1. If there be mixt Numbers, reduce them to Improper Fractions.

Note 2. If any of the given Fractions be Compound, that is Fractions of Fracti­ons, they must be reduc'd to simple Fra­ctions by Reduction the 2d.

The Rule of Three Reverse in Fractions.

HEre also, as in that of whole Num­bers, you are to Multiply the se­cond Term by the first, and divide the pro­duct by the third, the Quotient answers the Question.

Example.

If 2/5; of a Yard of Cloath that is a yard broad will make a Garment, How much of 3 Yards wide will make the said Gar­ment.

[...]

Proof.

[...]

More Examples.

If 54 Men can build a House in 38 days ⅔, How many Men will build the said House in 11 days ⅚. Answer 176 Men 96/213.

Lent my Friend ⅝ of a pound for ⅔ of a Year, How much ought he to lend me for 2 Years, to recompence my kindness. Answer 5/24.

If when a Bushel of Wheat is sold for 5 shillings ⅔, the penny white Loaf weighs 7 Ounces ¾, What must it weigh when the Bushel of Wheat cost 6 shillings 4/7. Answer, 6 Ounces 377/552.

A Collection of pleasant and useful Que­stions to Exercise the Rules of Vul­gar Fractions,

By Reduction 5th.

WHat's the ⅔ of 17 s. Answer 11 s. 4 d. What's the 5/7 of ⅖ of a Guinea at 21 s. 2 d. Answer, 6 s. 00 d. ½ q. 2/7.

What's the ⅔ of half a Mark. Answer 4 s. 5 d. ¼ q. ⅓.

What's the ⅗ of a Dollar at 4 s. 2 d. Answer, 2 s. 6 d.

What's the 7/9 of 5 pounds. Answer, 3 l. 17 s. 9 d. ¼ q. ⅓.

What's the ⅝ of 13 d. ½ Answer 8 d. ¼ q. ¾.

What's the 3/7 of 8 Ounces ½ Troy weight. Answer 3 oz. 12 dwt. 20 gr. 4/7.

What's the 7/9 of 15 days 3 hours. An­swer, 11 days 18 hours 20 minutes.

By Reduction 2d. and 5th.

What's the ½ of ⅔ of a pistole at 18 s. Answer, 6 s.

What's the 5/7 of 8/9 of a Ducat at 7 s. 3 d. Answer 4 s. 7 d. 0 q. 20/21.

What's the ¾ of ⅚ of ⅞ of a Guinea at 22 s. 2 d. Answer, 12 s. 1 d. ¼ q. ⅞.

What's the ⅜ of ⅕ of 13 l. 4 s. 7 d. An­swer 19 s. 10 d. 0 q. ⅛.

What's the ⅔ of ¾ of 5 Nobles. Answer 16 s. 8 d.

What's the ⅖ of ½ of ¼ of 1 lib. 3 oz. 2 dwt. Troy. Answer, 15 dwt. 2 gr. ⅖.

Questions that Exercise most of the pre­ceding Rules.

HOw much is ⅔ of ⅚ and ¾ of ½ of a Jacobus at 25 s. Answer 1 l. 3 s. 3 d. 0 q. ⅔.

How much is ½ of ⅔ and ⅞ of 9/10. of a Hundred weight Averdupoize. Answer, 1 c. 0 q. 13 lib. 8/15.

What Quantity is that, from which if I take 3 5/7 the remainder shall be 1 ⅖. An­swer, 5 4/35.

What Quantity is that. from which if I take ½ of 5/9 the remainder shall be 2/7 of 5. Answer, 1 89/126.

What's the difference betwixt ½, ⅓ and ¼, and a whole Unite. Answer, 1/12.

What Quantity is that, to which if I add 3 5/7 the Summ will be 5 4/35. An­swer 1 ⅖.

What Quantity is that, to which if I add ⅕ of 9/7, the Summ will be 1 89/126. An­swer 1681/4410

A person has 2/7 and 1/11 of a Mine, What part is that of the whole. An­swer, 29/77.

Another Miner has ¾ and 5/7 and 1/16 of a Mine, What share or part is that of the whole. Answer 107/112

A Merchant has 3/16 and ½ of ¼ of a share in the Cargo of a ship, What part is that of the whole. Answer 40/128. or 5/16.

Another person has ⅕ of ⅛ and 1/11 of ⅔ of a ship, how much is that of the whole. Answer, 113/1320.

Such Questions as the four last, are fre­quent among those that have parts in Mines, or Ships.

What's the product of 3 s. 6 d. by 3 s. 6 d. Here you are to consider that 6 d. is a part of a Shilling, and therefore the Que­stion more rightly propos'd is, What's the product of 3 ½ by 3 ½. Answer 49/4 or 12 ¼ that is 12 s. 3 d.

Again, What's the product of 3 l. 19 s. 11 d. by 3 l. 19 s. 11 d. Here (as before) consider, that 19 s. 11 d. is 239/240 of a Pound sterling: And so the Question more rightly stated is, What's the product of 3 239/240 by 3 239/240. Answer, 919681/57600 or 15 l. & 55681/57600 of a pound.

A certain Person having ⅗ parts of a Coal Mine, sells ¾ of his share for 171 l. What is the whole Coal Mine worth. An­swer, 380 l.

A Father dying left his Son a certain portion, of which he spent ¼; then of the rest he spent ½, and then he had 252 l. What was the Portion the Father gave him. Answer, 672 l.

When the ⅖ of ¾ of a ship is 147 l. 11 s. 3 d. How much is the whole. Answer, 491 l. 17 s. 6 d.

A Merchant bought ⅔ of ¾ of a ship, another buys ⅜ of ⅘ of the same, the Question is, Whether their parts were equal, and if not, which had the big­gest [Page 31]of the two. Answer, the first Mer­chant by ⅕.

A younger Brother received 210 l. which was ⅜ of ⅔ of his Elder Brother's Portion: Now 3 ½ times his Elder Bro­ther's Portion was 1 ⅓ time his Father's Estate, I demand what his Father's Estate was. Answer, 2205 l.

A Person making his Will gave to one Child ⅖ of ¾ of his Estate, and to another ⅚ of ⅔ of his Estate, and when they counted their Portions, the one had 543 l. 1 s. 9 d. more than the other, I demand how much each had, and what was their Father's Estate. Answer, The first had 673 l. 10 s. 9 d. and the second 1180 l. 12 s. 6 d. and their Fathers Estate was 2125 l. 2 s. 6 d.

A certain Person gave to one of his Children ¾ of ⅖ of his Estate, and of the Remainder he gave another ⅜ of ⅔, and when they told their Money, the one had 173 l. 12 s. 4 d. more than the other, How much had each, and what was their Father's Estate. Answer, the first had 416 l. 13 s. 7 d. ⅕. The Second 243 l. 1 s. 3 d. ⅕. And their Father's Estate was 3388 l. 18 s. 8 d.

THE DOCTRINE OF Decimal Fractions.

WHAT a Fraction is, and how read, I have already declared in the Doctrine of Vulgar Fractions, and therefore I shall here only shew the dif­ferent way of Noting these from that of Vulgar, with their great use in the Solu­tion of several Arithmetick Questions.

A Decimal Fraction is that which hath for its Denominator an Unite, with a cer­tain Number of Cyphers as 10, 100, 1000, 10000, &c. are all Denominators of Decimal Fractions.

Hence 'tis evident, that we divide the Unite into 10, 100, 1000, 10000, &c. equal parts. For dividing it first into 10 equal parts, and each of those are [Page 33]again divided into 10 other equal parts; so that the Unite will then be divided into 100 equal parts; and if again we divide each of those hundred equal parts into ten other equal parts, the Unite or Integer will be divided into 1000 equal parts; And so by Decimating the first, and Subdecimating the second, we pro­ceed ad infinitum.

Now because all the Denominators of Decimal Fractions differ only in the Number of places, and not in the Figures, they being always an Unite with Cy­phers, they may be express'd without their Denominators with a point before them, as 6/10 is thus express'd .6, and 54/100 thus .54, also 27/1000 thus .027 And ob­serve, that this point distinguishes them from whole Numbers.

Hence the Denominator of a Decimal Fraction is easily known by the places of the Numerator, the Denominator being always one place more, as .6 hath 10 for its Denominator, and .54 hath 100, and .027 hath 1000 for its Denomina­tor, understand the like of any other.

The order of places in Decimals is from left to right, and therefore contra­ry to the order of places in a whole Num­ber [Page 34]which is from right to left, as in this Decimal .548, here 5 is in the first place next the left hand, and signifies so many tenth parts of an Unite, and is therefore called Primes; the 4 which is in the second place, signifies so many hundred parts of an Unite, and is called Seconds; the figure 8 which possesses the third place from the left hand, denotes so many thousandth parts of an Unite, or Integer, and is called Thirds, and so on, as in the following Table.

The Notation Table for Decimals.

Primes3Tenth partsof Unity.
Seconds5Hundr. parts
Thirds7Thous. parts
Fourths9X Thous. parts
Fifths8C Thous. parts
Sixths4Mill. parts

This Table consists only of a Decimal Fraction, against which above is set the Value of each place, and below its Name.

From a little consideration of what has been said 'tis evident, that Cyphers pre­fix'd on the right hand of the Numerator of a Decimal Fraction, do neither increase nor lessen its value. For .2 is of the same value with .20 or .200 &c. And there­fore 'tis very easy reducing Decimal Fracti­ons to a common Denominator, for 'tis but seting Cyphers on the right hand of the Numerator: As suppose .3 and .84 and .476 and .2356 were Decimal Fracti­ons, and it was required to reduce them to one Denominator; here I consider that the Denominator of the greatest Decimal given is 10000, I therefore add so many Cyphers to each of the Numerators that will make each of their Denominators to consist of five places, so that the above proposed Decimals, when reduced, stand thus .3000 and .8400 and .4760 and .2356.

I have been as clear as possible in ex­plaining the Notation of these Numbers, because of the great facility they bring with their practice in several Operations, [Page 36]not only in Arithmetick, but in most o­ther parts of the Mathematicks. For, had our first Institution of Dividing our Mo­ney, Weight, Measure, &c. been Decimal­ly, we had never been troubled with so many Fractions, which cause such great tediousness in several Operations. And indeed the Art of Arithmetick would be taught with much more ease and expedi­tion than now it is, in case such a Refor­mation should ever be brought to pass.

Reduction of Decimals.

WHat is here to be done is no more than what was shown in Reduction the 5th. of Vulgar Fractions, only here I shall more largely comment upon what I there but hinted; and show in the first place how to reduce a Vulgar Fraction to a Decimal, and then how to find the Value of any Decimal in the known parts of Coin, Weight, Time, &c. and that with as much brevity and clearness as I can.

To Reduce a Vulgar Fraction to a Decimal.

THe proportion for reducing a Vul­gar Fraction to a Decimal, is, As the Denominator of the Vulgar Fraction to its Numerator, So is 10, 100, 1000, &c. or any assign'd Denominator, to its Numerator, that is to the Decimal required.

Exam. 1. Suppose it was required to reduce ¾ to a Decimal Fraction, the Ope­ration is as follows,

[...]

So that .7500 or .75 (for Cyphers on the right hand a Decimal Fraction neither increases nor diminishes its value) is the Decimal equivalent to ¾.

Note.

From the preceding proportion 'tis evi­dent, That if to the Numerator of any Vulgar Fraction you annex so many Cy­phers, as you would have your Decimal to consist of places, and divide by the Denominator, the Quote gives the Deci­mal required.

Exam. 2. Reduce 15/19 to a Decimal of five places.

To 15 the Numerator of the given Vulgar Fraction I annex five Cyphers, it makes 1500000, this I divide by 19 the Denominator, the Quote is the Decimal required. See the following Operation.

[...]

So that the Decimal equal to the given Vulgar Fraction is .78947, which be­cause of the remainder, is not exactly the truth, yet 'tis so near, that it wants not 1/100000 part of an Unite of the truth, and if you proceed farther to make the De­cimal consist of six places, it will be .789473, and then it will not want 1/1000000 part of an Unite of the truth; for if the Decimal be made .789474, it would exceed the true value.

And thus by Increasing the Number of places in the Decimal you may at last come infinitely near, tho' never to the truth it self.

Exam. 3. Reduce 1/32 into a Decimal of five places.

[...]

Here (because the Decimal is required to five places) I add five Cyphers to 1 the Numerator of the given Fraction, and then divide by 32 the Denominator, the Quote gives 3125 for the Decimal sought.

But here Note, that because I annex'd five Cyphers to 1 the given Numerator, and there arises but four figures in the Quote, I must supply such defect by pre­fixing as many Cyphers on the left hand of the first figure in the Quote as there wants places, as in the preceding Ex­ample. where the Quote consisted but of four figures or places, here I annex a Cypher on the left hand of 3 the first fi­gure in the Quote, and then it becomes .03125 which is the true Decimal re­quired.

To Reduce the known parts of Money, Weight, Time, &c. to a Decimal Frac­tion.

FRom what precedes, 'tis evident how the known parts of Money, Weight, Time, &c. may be turn'd into a Decimal of the same Value, or Infinitely near it, for if in Money, a Pound Ster­ling be an Integer, whatsoever is less [Page 41]than a Pound, is either a part or parts of the same; and when you know what part or parts thereof it is, you may easily Reduce it to a Decimal of the same Va­luc, from what was taught in the last.

Exam. What's the Decimal of 9 s. That is Reduce 9/20 into a Decimal consisting of two places.

[...]

Here working according to what has been before directed, I find the Decimal of 9 s. to be .45

So if I would know the Decimal of 9 d. here I consider that 9 d. is 9/12 of 1/20 of a Pound or 9/240.

Working therefore according to the preceding Rule, I find the equivalent Decimal to be .0375.

Again, if I would know the Decimal of 3 Farthings, here I must consider that 3 Farthings is the ¾ of 1/12 of 1/20 or 3/960 of a pound, and therefore working as be­fore, I find the Decimal to be .0031 near.

Lastly, if it were requir'd to find the Decimal of 7 l. 08 s. ¾ that is 371 Far­things, or 371/900 here repeating the like o­peration, I find the Equivalent Decimal to be 3864, the like is to be understood in reduceing to Decimals, the known parts of Weight, Time, Measure, Mo­tion, &c.

To find the Value of a Decimal Fraction in the known parts of Money, Weight, Time, &c.

THis is but the Converse of the for­mer; and therefore the Rule for finding the Value of a Decimal is groun­ded upon the same reason as that of turn­ing any part of Coyne, &c. to a Deci­mal.

For 'twill hold as the Decimal Denomina­tor is to its Numerator, So is the parts in the next Inferior Denomination to the Nu­merator, or Number of such parts contain'd in the Decimal.

And hence comes this Rule. Multi­ply the given Decimal by the parts of the next inferior Denomination, that are equal to the Integer the Decimal gives the parts of, and from the product cut [Page 43]of so many figures towards the right hand as there are places in the given Decimal, the remaining figures on the left side are the value of the said Deci­mal in the next inferior Denomination: If any thing remain, it is the Decimal of an Integer in the Denomination last found, and may be reduced as low as you please by the same Rule, and after the same manner, as it was in Reduct. 5th. of Vul­gar Fractions.

Exam. How much is .3765 of a pound Sterling. I say,

As 10000 to 3765, So is 20 to 7 s. 6 d.

See the work. [...]

So that from the preceding Work I find the true Value of this Decimal of a Pound sterling .3765 to be 7 s. 6 d. ¼ .44 After a like process may the Value of any Decimal of Weight, Time, Measure, &c. be found.

Some more Examples, I might here have added, but I think the Method is so plain, that it will be needless; I shall therefore forbear, and in the room there­of show you a brief, and practical Rule for finding the value of any Decimal of a Pound Sterling, as soon as ever you hear it nam'd,

The Rule is

The figure in the first place, or place of Primes, being doubled gives you the Number of Shillings, and if the Figure in the second place be 5, or above it, take one Shilling for the five, and add to the former Number of Shillings, found by doubling, then for that which remains above 5, with the Figure in the third place, count so many Farthings less by 1, that those two Figures make, being set in a Numeral Order, or if the Figure in the second place be under 5, then reckon so many Farthings wanting 1, as that and the Figure in the third place of the Deci­mal make in Number. An Example or two will make it plain.

Exam. 1. What's the .375 of a pound Sterling.

Here I double 3, which stands in the place of Primes, and that gives 6 s. then [Page 45]because the next Figure (7) is above 5, I add one Shilling to the 6 before found, and it makes 7 s. then the 2 which is left of the 7, with the 5 in the place of thirds, makes 25, which being lessen'd by 1, gives 24 Farthings, so that the value of .375 is 7 s. 6 d.

Exam. 2.

What's the Decimal of .719.

Here the first figure 7 doubled gives 14 for the Number of Shillings, as be­fore, and for the other 19 that remains I account 18 Farthings, which is 4 d ½. so that the value of the Decimal .719 is 14 s. 4 d. ½.

More Examples might here be given, but I think these are sufficient to illus­trate this practical way of finding the va­lve of the Decimal of a pound Sterling.

I shall conclude this with the Insertion of the Decimal Table, for finding the va­lue of any Decimal of a pound Sterling, omitting those of Weight, Measure, Time, &c. because of their being so seldom u­sed, and if required, so easily Calculated from the aforementioned proportion, and likewise for their frequency in Books of this Nature.

A TABLE, showing the Decimal of any part of a Pound sterling, & contra.

Shillings.19.95
18.9
17.85
16.8
15.75
14.7
13.65
12.6
11.55
10.5
9.45
8.4
7.35
6.3
5.25
4.2
3.15
2.1
1.05

Pence.11.04584
10.04166
9.0375
8.03333
7.02917
6.025
5.02083
4.01667
3.0125
2.0083
1.00417

Farth.3.00312
2.00208
1.00104

The Use of the Table.

The method of making this Table is evident from what procedes, and its use almost as apparent. Let the Decimal of 13 s. 7 d. ½, be required, Seek in the Table first for the Decimal of 13 s. which is .65 next for the Decimal of 7 d. which [Page 47]is .02917, and lastly for the Decimal of ½, which is .00208; I set these Decimals in the order following, and add them together.

[...]

By which you see the Decimal of 13 s. 7 d. ½ is .68125. In like manner may the Decimal of any other Sum be found, as also the Sum belonging to any given Decimal.

Addition of Decimals.

AS to the manner of adding, 'tis the the same as in common Addition, the business being only to see that they are rightly plac'd, according to the man­ner of their Notation, which thing is easily effected, by seting the point prefixt to them under each other; for then the rest of the places will fall right, whether they be whole Numbers and Decimals, or all Decimals.

Some Examples.

[...]

Here you see in all these cases that Primes stands under Primes, Seconds under Seconds, &c. And where Integers are joyn'd with Decimals, there unites, stands under unites, and Tens under Tens, &c. In which Examples 'tis very plain, that the method of adding is put as it was in whole Numbers, only here you are to make the summ consist of no more Decimal places, then is in the great­est part of it. As in our first Example, the Summ consisted of fix places or Fi­gures, and the greatest part but of five, I therefore cut off five Figures in the Sum, toward the right hand for the Decimal parts, the remainder on the left are In­tegers.

Note, That in this, and the following Rule, the Decimals given to be added, or [Page 49]Substracted, must be parts of the same whole.

More Examples.

What's the Sume of 29 & 3.007 & .94 & 89.76. Answer.

What's the Sume of 3.87 & 486 & .4 & .025. Answer.

What's the Sume of 59.4 & 8.796 & 472.6 & .142. Answer.

Note, that In. over the preceding and following Sums stands for Integer, and pts. for Parts.

Substraction of Decimals.

THe Operation here is in all respects like to that in Vulgar Substraction, the main thing (as in the last) being on­ly to see that they are rightly placed, which is done by the direction given in the foregoing Rule of Addition.

Some Examples

[...]

Here you see we Substract as in com­mon Substraction, only observe, that where the Decimals have not an equal Number of places, the vacances are sup­plied with Ciphers, or are understood so to be, especially in the upper Number.

More Examples.

  • From 15 substract 7.8 Answ. 7.2
  • From 1 substract .9872 Answ. .0128
  • From 58.6 substract 3.98625. Answ. 54.61375

Multiplication of Decimals.

IN Multiplication of Decimals, both the manner of placing and multiply­ing is in all respects and cases, the same with that of placing and multiplying whole Numbers, the business here being [Page 51]only to find the value of the Product af­ter the Operation is ended, which to do take this general

Rule.

See how many Decimal places there are in the Multiplicand and Multiplior, and from the Product toward the right hand cut off so many as are in both these, so shall the Fi­gures on the right hand of the point be De­cimal places, and those on the left side In­tegers.

[...]

But if when the Multiplication is end­ed, there arise not so many Figures in the Product, as ought to be cut off, then is such defect to be supply'd, by annex­ing as many Cyphers on the Left Hand thereof, as there wants places; with a point before them, and you have the true value of the product; See the following Examples.

[...]

The consideration of this practice will be of some help to you, in finding the true value of the Quote in Division.

More Examples.

[...]

Of Contraction in Multiplication of mixt Numbers.

THere is in this kind of Multiplica­tion, a certain way of Contraction, by which you may get the product, to as few, or many places as you please, without the tedious Multiplication of the whole; the Method of which is as follows.

As Suppose 9.58 was to be Multiplyed by 8.79, here 'tis evident the decimal [Page 53]will consist of 4 places, and only two would be sufficient.

Set down the bigger of the two Quan­tities for the Multiplicand, and then set the place of Unites in the Multiplior, under that place of parts in the Multi­plicand, you would have in the pro­duct, and then invert the Order of all the other places in the Multiplior, that is, set the place of Tenns, where Primes should be, and the place of Primes where Tenns should be, and so on with the invertion of the rest; then let each Figure of the Multiplior, Multiply that of the Multiplicand, which is just over, Remembring to add, what would have been brought thither from the following places; then add up all together, and from the Summ cut of two Figures (in this Example) next the Right Hand, and you have your desire, all which by the following Examples, compar'd with this direction will plainly appear.

Example 1st.

By the common way [...]

By Contraction [...]

Example 2d.

By the Common way [...]

By Contraction [...]

This last was requir'd to three places, where you see they are seperated by a [Page 55]point toward the Right Hand, being 190, but should have been 192; which small Errour is caus'd by the want of the Carriage from the next row, and there­fore if you would have it exactly to 3 places, especially in great Summs, you ought to do it to four.

Division of Decimals.

THE manner of working Decimal Di­vision, is in every thing like to that of Common Division, and therefore no regard as to their place and Nature is here to be had, any more than what was in Division of whole Numbers; the Mi­stery of this lying first in their prepara­tion, when need requires. Secondly, In finding the true Value of that Quote after the Division is ended.

First, Therefore when it happens, that the Divisor has more places than the Di­vidend, you must put to the Right Hand of the dividend, (whether it be a whole Number, mixt or Decimal Fraction) a certain Number of Ciphers at pleasure, by which it is made fit for Operation.

As suppose 14 was to be divided by 361, 'tis evident here is an absolute Ne­cessity of prefixing Ciphers to 14 the Di­vidend, before you can divide by 361 the Divisor.

The Dividend being thus prepared take Notice, that there must be as many decimal places in the Divisor and Quo­tient as are in the Dividend; for the di­vidend is in effect the product, and the Divisor and Quotient the Multiplicand and Multiplior. And therefore for the finding the value of the Quotient this is the

Rule.

Look how many Decimal places are in the Dividend, more than in the Divisor, for so many Decimal places will there be in the Quotient.

And here Note, that you must be sure to make the Dividend consist of more places than the Divisor, if it doth not so already, which is easily done, by ad­ing Ciphers.

Example.

[...]

Having annexed 4 Ciphers to each of the Dividends, the first Dividend being an Integer, consists only of the 4 Deci­mals added; but the later being a Deci­mal, is made to consist of six Decimals by the 4 Ciphers that was added; they being thus prepared, and the work of Division over, you see the Quote consists; of 4 places; now considering how many [Page 58]Decimal places there is in each of those Quotes more than in their proper Divi­dends, and you shall find that in the first Quote, there ought to be two places of Decimals, and in the second six of the like places, which because there is but four, I prefix two Ciphers on the Left Hand thereof, which makes it .004216.

Some more Examples.

[...]

I have to these 4 Examples, set only the Dividends prepar'd with their Quo­tients truly Valued, the consideration of which, with the preceding direction, I hope will be a sufficient light in all o­ther Cases that can happen.

Of the Use of Decimals.

TO show the use of these Numbers in all Solutions, where they might be applied in Expediting an Operation, would be endless, they being of great use in most parts of the Mathematicks; but particularly, and principally in Gauging, Surveying, and Measuring, Calculating the Tables of Interest, raising of Loga­rithmes; as may be seen in most Books, that have Writ of these Subjects, I shall therefore forbear giving Examples of use­ing them in any of these parts, Except I had Treated distinctly of each of them; and shall close rhis Paragraph with the Collection of a few easy Questions, which are very speedily and easy solv'd by these Numbers.

By Multiplication.

IN 756 Pistoles, at 18 s. each, How many Pounds Sterling. Answ. 680 l. 08 s.

In 439 Guinea's, at 22 s. 6 d. each, How many Pounds sterling. Answ. 493 l. 17 s. 6 d.

If I spend 4 s. 6 d. per Day, How much is that for one Year. Answ. 82 l. 2 s. 6 d.

If a yard of Cloth is worth 6 s. 9 d. What comes 59 Yards to at that Rate. Answ. 19 l. 18 s. 3 d.

If a piece of Paving be 34 foot, 6 in­ches long, and 24 foot, 9 inches broad, What's the Content in square feet. Answ. 853 foot .875

If one Man's share in the Cargo of a ship come to 38 l. 14 s. What was the whole worth, supposing there was 158 Men in the ship. Answ. 6114 l. 12 s.

If the Interest of 500 l. for one Day is 2 s. 3 d. What's that for a Year. Answ. 41 l. 1 s. 3 d.

By Division.

IN 680 l. 8 s. How many Pistoles, at 18 s. each. Answ. 756.

In 493 l. 17 s. 6 d. How many Gui­nea's at 22 s. each. Answ. 439.

If I spend 82 l. 2 s. 6 d. in one year. What is that for one day. Answ. 4 s. 6 d.

If 59 Yards of Cloth cost 19 l. 18 s. 3 d. What Cost one Yard. Answ. 6 s. 9 d.

If the Content of a piece of Paving be 853 Foot .875 and the length be 34 foot 6 Inches. What's the true breadth. Answ. 24 Foot 9 Inches.

If the whole Cargo of a ship be 6114 l. 12 s. and there be 158 men in the ship. What comes each man's share. Answ. 38 l. 14 s.

If the Interest of 500 l. for a Year is 41 l. 1 s. 3 d. What is that for one day. Answ. 2 s. 3 d.

I conceive it needless to meddle with the Rule of Three, it being in all kinds and respects performed like that in Vul­gar Fractions; I shall therefore leave the Exercise of Questions of this nature to the Ingenious.

A Specimen of the Demonstration of the Operations of Vulgar and Decimal Fractions.

I Shall first begin with that of Vulgar Fractions, and in order to the more clear apprehending thereof, I must make a short Repetition of what has been al­ready declared in the first page, viz.

That a Fraction is a part or parts of some divisible Integer, and is represented by two Numbers, the one above the o­ther beneath a Line thus ⅖.

The Number placed beneath the Line is called the Denominator, and shows what parts the Unite is divided into.

The Number placed above the Line is called the Numerator, and shows how many of those parts are to be taken in the Fraction.

As the Fraction ⅖ denotes two such parts as the Integer contains 5.

From this method of expressing Frac­tions it follows.

That every Fraction is to its whole an Unite, as the Numerator is to the Deno­minator, and consequently.

First, That if the Numerator be

  • greater
  • equal
  • less

than the Denominator, the Fraction is ac­cordingly greater equal or less than its whole an Unite. The first and second of these kinds are called Improper Fractions, the last are termed Proper.

Secondly, That Fractions are not to be estimated by the greatness of their Num­bers by which they are express'd, but by the proportion the Numerators bear to the Denominators.

Thirdly, That Fractions, whose Nume­rators to their Denominators bear the same proportion, are equal as ½. 3/6. 10/12.

Fourthly, That every Fraction is the Quotient of the Numerator divided by the Denominator.

This being granted, I propose the fol­lowing Lemma.

Lemma.

If a Number multiply two Numbers, their Products are in such proportion to each other, as the Numbers multiplied are to them­selves.

For 3 multiplying

  • 6
  • 8

produceth

  • 18
  • 24

then I say that 6:8::18:24. Which thing is evident from the common Notion of Multiplication. For 1:3::

  • 6:18
  • 8:24

and therefore 6:18::8:24 by the 11th. of the Fifth of Euclid.

But by alternation 6:8::18:24, which was to be proved.

Having laid down this as a foundation, I shall proceed to a Demonstration of each particular Operation.

Reduction the First.

This is so clear from the nature and manner of expressing a Fraction, as also from the first consequent, that it needs no farther Demonstration.

Reduction the Second.

The Proof of this is a consequent from that of Multiplication, and therefore I re­fer it to that place.

Reduction the Third.

This teaches to abbreviate a Fraction, by dividing both Numerator and Deno­minator by any Number that will divide both without a remainder.

As suppofe 6/8 is given to be reduced to its lowest Terms, here dividing 6 by 2, and 8 by 2, there arises ¾; now since 3 and 4 multiplied by 2 produces the same Numbers, viz. 6/8. therefore 3:4::6:8 and therefore the Fraction ¾ is equal to 6/8 by the Lemma, and third Consequent.

Reduction the Fourth.

This teaches to reduce Fractions of divers Denominations into one Denomi­tion, having the same value, for doing of which the

Rule is

Multiply all the Denominators for a common Denominator, then multiply each Numerator into all the Denominators, except its own, for a new Numerator.

As suppose ⅜ and 2/7 were given to be so reduced.

From the Operation according to the Rule they will stand thus 3x7 / 8x7 and 8x2 / 8x7 that is 21/56 and 16/56, which Fractions are by the aforesaid Lemma and third Consequent e­qual to those given.

Again, Suppose ⅔.¾.⅘ were given thus to be reduced. The Fractions [...] that is 40/60 45/60 48/60 are evidently equal to the Fractions proposed by the said Lemma, and third Conse­quent.

Reduction the Fifth.

This is proved in the Reduction of a Vulgar Fraction to a Decimal.

Of Addition and Substraction of Fractions.

THe Fractions whose Summ or Diffe­rence is required must be reduced to equal Fractions, having the same Deno­mination. And then according to the Rule the

  • Summ
  • Difference

of the Numerators placed over the common Denominator is the

  • Summ
  • Difference

of the Fractions requir'd.

Exam. What's the Summ and Diffe­rence of ⅜ and 2/7.

The Fractions reduced to others equal to them, and of the same Denomination are 21/56 and 16/56 consequently 21 ± 16 / 56 is the

  • Summ
  • Difference

of the Fractions, that is the Summ is 37/56, the Difference 5/56, which was required.

Of Multiplication of Fractions.

For finding the product of any two Fractions, this is the

Rule.

Multiply the Numerators together for a new Numerator, and the Denomina­tors together for a new Denominator, the Fraction thus produced is the pro­duct.

Exam. Suppose ¾ was given to be Multiplied by ⅔, the Product is [...]

The reason of which is evident, for by the 4th. Consequent I confider these Frac­tions as the Quotients of their respective Numerators divided by their Denomina­tors, and so if I multiply ¾ by 2 it gives 2x3 / 4 for to double any Quotient, is to double the Dividend: But now since I have multiplied by 2, when I ought to have multiplied by ⅓ of 2, therefore ⅓ of this product is the truth, which I ef­fect by tripling the divisor 4. Therefore [...] is the product of ⅔ by ¾.

And here you may take notice, that the product of any Quantity multiplied by a Fraction is always less than the Quantity so multiplied.

The reason of which follows from the Principle of Common Multiplication, which is, that every Product contains the Dividend so often as the Divisor con­tains 1 or Unity. If therefore the Mul­tiplior be less than 1 or Unity, the Pro­duct will be less than the Multipli­cand; For according to this Principle, the Product must not contain the Multi­plicand once, because the Multiplior doth not Unity.

Hence the Product of two Fractions is evidently less than either of them.

And hence also the reason of reducing Compound Fractions to Simple ones is very clear; for to take the ⅔ of ¾, is no more than to Multiply those two Fracti­ons together.

Of Division.

For working of Division the

Rule is

Multipliply the Denominator of the Divisor into the Numerator of the Di­vidend for a new Numerator, and the Numerator of the Divisor into the De­nominator of the Dividend for a new De­nominator, the Fraction thus formed shall be the Quotient.

Suppose ⅔ to be divided by ¾.

[...]

Here, as before, I consider the Fracti­ons as Quotients: So that if the Exam­ple had been, How many ¼ is in ⅔; the Answer would be 4x2 / 3, for that is only Quadrupling the Numerator. But since my Divisor is ¾, 'tis evident the for­mer Quote is 3 times too much; where­fore I take ⅓ of it by tripling the Divi­for, and then it stands as above.

Of Decimal Fractions.

DEcimal Fractions (as I have else­where noted) are only Fractions, whose Denominators are an Unite with Cyphers, as 10, 100, 1000, &c. And are conveniently written without their Denominators; for if the Numerators consists of places equal in Number to the Cyphers in the Denominator, then prefix a point before the Numerator, and [Page 70]omit the Denominator; but if the Deno­minator do not consist of as many pla­ces as there are Cyphers in the Denomi­nator, then you must supply that defect by puting Cyphers before the significant figures of such Numerator, with a point on the left hand of such Cypher, or Cy­phers,

As 3/10 78/100 86/1000 54/10000 are thus express'd .3 .78 .086. .0054

To reduce a Vulgar Fraction to a Decimal.

SAy, As the Denominator of the Frac­tion proposed, is to its Numerator, so is 10, 100, 1000 &c. that is, an Unite with as many Cyphers as I intend my Decimal shall have places, to the Nume­rator of a Decimal equal to it.

Example.

Reduce ¾ into a Decimal of two pla­ces [...]

So that 75/100 or .75 is equal to the Fra­ction proposed by the third Conse­quent.

The 5th. Reduction is here prov'd, this being the same with that, only then we knew not the name of Decimals, for such Fractions as had 10, 100 &c. for the Denominator.

Theorem.

The Decimal Fraction .234 is equal to 2/10 + 3/100 + 4/1000 Also the mixt Quan­tity 3.856 is equal to 8 + 8/10 + 5/100 + 6/1000.

For 2/10=200/1000 & 3/100=30/1000 & 4/1000=4/1000 As also 3=3000/1000 & 8/10=800/1000 & 5/100=50/1000 & 6/1000=6/1000. But 2/1000+3/1000 +4/1000=the Summ 234/1000=.234 Also 3000/1000+8/1000+5/1000+6/1000=the Summ 3. 856/1000=3.856 by the third Consequent.

Hence the first place after the Point in Decimals is the place of Tenths, the second of Hundredths, the third of Thou­sandths, &c. decreasing in a Subdecuple proportion, from Unity towards the right hand, as whole Numbers increase from Unity towards the left in a Decu­ple proportion. Hence 'tis easie

To Add or Substract Decimals.

The Rule.

Place Unites under Unites, Tenths un­der Tenths, Hundredths under Hun­dredths, &c. Then add or substract, as if they were whole Numbers.

Exam. in Add.

[...]

Exam. in Sub.

[...]

Multiplication of Decimals.

MUltiply Integers and Decimals to­gether, as if all were Integers, and then cut off as many places from the Product towards your right hand, or Decimals, as is the Number of Decimal places in both Multiplicand and Multi­plior.

Example.

[...]

Here 32.5 is 324/10 and 7.6 is 76/10, which two Fractions multiplied by the Rule given for Multiplication of Vulgar Fra­ctions produce 24624/2100 or 246.24 The same holds in all other.

Division of Decimals.

DIvide the Dividend by the Divisor in all respects, as in whole Numbers, only observe that so many Decimal pla­ces as there are in the Dividend more than there are in the Divisor, so many must be cut off from the Quotient to the right hand for Decimals.

Example.

[...]

The reason of which is evident from Division of Vulgar Fractions.

FINIS.

Advertisement.

ALL Sorts of Mathematick Instru­ments both for Sea and Land, are most Correctly Made, and Sold, by John Worgan, under St. Dunstan's Church in Fleetstreet.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.