Some reason tenderly offered to the serious consideration of the commissioners, for executing the Poll Act; why such persons should not be rated 20 s. as preachers, or teachers, who do not receive any profits, or salaries for such their preaching or teaching.

Some reason tenderly offered to the serious consideration of the commissioners, for executing the Poll Act; why such persons should not be rated 20 s. as preachers, or teachers, who do not receive any profits, or salaries for such their preaching or teaching.

Table of contents

Some Reasons tenderly offered to the Serious Consideration of the Commissioners, for Executing the Poll Act; why such Persons should not be Rated 20 s. as Preachers, or Teachers, who do not receive any Profits, or Salaries for such their Preaching or Teaching.

§

[Page]

Some Reasons tenderly offered to the Serious Consideration of the Commissioners, for Executing the Poll Act; why such Persons should not be Rated 20 s. as Preachers, or Teachers, who do not receive any Profits, or Salaries for such their Preaching or Teaching.

1. BEcause in the beginning of the Act, It is said, That all Persons and Bodies Politick, &c. having Estates Personal, &c. Therefore it doth appear, the Parliament did not intend they should pay that had no Income or Estate.

2. The Parliament hath thorough the whole Act seem'd to have a tender Care that none should be rated to this Tax, but such as by their own Estates, or by the Profits of their Places, were Enabled to pay; of the Reality of which, the Act it self giveth several Instances; As for Example, in page 15. Every Man of the Degree of a Doctor, is rated 5 l. but in pag. 16. it is provided, That if any Doctor of Law or Divinity, hath not some Promotion, Benefice or Preferment, he shall not be rated for his Degree or Title. Again, in pag. 14. Every Gentleman is rated 20 s. but in the same page, it is Provided, That any Gentleman that hath not 300 l. Estate, shall not be so rated.

3. It being Enacted, That Every Clergy-man who has an Ecclesiastical Benefice worth 50 l. per Annum, or more, at Improved Value, should be Assessed 20 s. It appears not Coherent therewith, that any Preacher or Teacher in any Meeting-house, that hath no Benesice, Salary, Gain, or Contribution for Preaching, should be Assessed 20 s. or any Sum on that Account. And there are such Preachers who have a Consciencious Respect to Christ's Command, and his Ministers Example, to Preach the Gospel freely, as they have freely received, and to keep the Gospel without Charge, Matth. 10. 1 Cor. 9. 18. 2 Cor. 11. 9. 1 Thess. 2. 9. 2 Thess. 3. 8. 1 Pet. 5. 2. And therefore it appears not Equal or Just, to Impose upon such in that Case.

4. It being provided in the said Act, that no Person by Vertue thereof, shall be doubly (or in two Capacities) charged; It reasonably follows, That if any Person be legally charged as a Gentleman, he ought not to be also charged as a Preacher, or Teacher, more especially, when he has no Profit or Gain for his Preaching.

5. And, whereas it is Alledged by some, That the Words, Every Preacher, or Teacher, in any Meeting-house whatsoever, doth not mention any other Qualification than Preaching or Teaching to make them liable; We coneive those Words, being but a part of the same Paragraph, where Benefices of 50 l. a Year, is required to make the Preachers of the Church of England liable.

The same Reason runs along thorough the whole Paragraph, being Conjunctive, and takes hold of Preachers and Teachers in Meeting-houses, who do reap by Contribution, or otherwise, 50 l. a Year; which very Words were expressed in the former Poll Act, and not of such Preachers or Teachers, as receive nothing for the same: For it were against Reason and Equity, to stretch the Words of that Paragraph against the Tenor of the Act; for a Minister, who hath between 40 and 50 l. per Annum, is excused by the Act, much more reason for a Minister, or Preacher that receiveth nothing.

6. To Impose a Tax of 20 s. upon such as Preach or Teach in Meeting-houses freely, only for their Preaching or Teaching, appears Contradictory to the Liberty granted and confirm'd to them in the Act of the late Parliament, to Exempt them from Penalties on that Account.

7. Lastly, Upon the serious and just Consideration of the Reasons proposed, it is humbly hoped, that the Commissioners and Assessors, will not insist upon, or extend the Letter of the Law, contrary to the Reason and Equity thereof, against poor Men, or Women, or others, meerly as Preachers or Teachers, who reap no Gain thereby; seeing that 'tis a Rule and Maxim well known, That Equity and Justice ought to be had regard to, in the Administration of all Laws, and in many Cases, to be preferred to the Words or Letter of the Law, as appears in that Ancient and Approved Treatise of Doctor and Student, Chap. 16. Treating of Equity, pag. 27, 28. Where its said, To follow the Words of the Law, were in some Cases against Justice, &c. Wherefore in some Cases, (saith he) It is necessary to leave the Words of the Law, and to follow what Reason and Justice requireth, &c.

§

§

London, Printed for Thomas Northcott, in George-Yard in Lombard-street, 1690.

Information about this book

Title statement

Some reason tenderly offered to the serious consideration of the commissioners, for executing the Poll Act; why such persons should not be rated 20 s. as preachers, or teachers, who do not receive any profits, or salaries for such their preaching or teaching.

Edition statement

1690

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A93521

ID [STC]

Wing S4579

ID [STC]

ESTC R184449

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

45578452

ID [OCLC]

ocm 45578452

ID [VID]

172368

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A93521)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 172368)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2627:22)

Source

— Some reason tenderly offered to the serious consideration of the commissioners, for executing the Poll Act; why such persons should not be rated 20 s. as preachers, or teachers, who do not receive any profits, or salaries for such their preaching or teaching.,

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.).

Printed for Thomas Northcott, George-Yard in Lombard-street,. London, :: 1690.. (Reproduction of original in the Friends' Library (London, England).)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.