THE RIGHT RELIGION, Reviewed and inlarged

By L. P. Gent.

John. 24.

No man cometh to the Father, but by Me.

Ezekiel. 13.

Woe be to foo­lish prophets, that follow their own spirit; they see nothing but vain things, and divine lies, say­ing, The Lord: whereas the Lord hath not sent them.

Printed at PARIS, M.DC.LVIII.

TO THE CATHOLIKES OF ENGLAND.

THe old saying, Truth purchaseth hatred, is verified at this time, wherein Truth is grown so loathsome and hatefull, that whosoever goes about to tell it, indangers displeasure. It is strange, that any can take distast at that all desire; which is to know the truth; [Page]Truth being the natural plea­sing object of the understan­ding. Neverthelesse such is the perverseness and vanity of some, that they despise and maligne what ought most of all to be cherisht and loved: of whom it is said, They prefer­red darkness before light, Joh.

3. Having then undertaken in this small Treatise to de­clare Gods revealed Truth, I should be wanting to my self in so dangerous an enterprize, if I did make choice of any other Patronage than yours (Renowned Catholikes) whose many and glorious suf­ferings for the said Truth have rankt you in the number [Page]of the best and greatest Con­querors: Others hold depen­dence of Fortun, you of Grace; they surmount force and strength common to beasts, you, Reason and Will proper to men: They overcome van­quish'd men, you, conquerors themselves; their conquest is of others onely, yours of others and your selves too. In a word, all the addition that is to be made to your greatness is a continuance of patience and constancy: And this God hath in store, and will give, conditionally that you ask it heartily; He that hath begun a good work in you, desires no better than to [Page]perfect the same. What need you fear? your enemies may hurt themselves, but want power to wrong you, unlesse you will: Nay, their worst is your best: taking away your estates, your good names, be­reaving you of your Liber­ties, your lives (those bruta fulmina, which render them so formidable) begets you a richer and surer possession, Heaven and Eternity. All the pudder they keep in vexing you is but sowing your seed for you; which undoubtedly will grow up to an hundred fold increase. Let them ham­mer, cut, hew you, till they are weary; they do no more [Page]than carve and fit you for the walls of Heaven. And who can justly say he is a loser, that changes for better? gets much with the losse of little? Take a serious view of the B. Saints, that passed, as you do, through a sea of calamites and troubles, and are now at rest with God; and amongst them all you will not discover one complaining. The richnesse and magnificence of their re­ward hath so fully recompen­sed their forrows and losses, that they wonder at the un­willingnesse and repining of some to part with; and at the greedinesse and injustice of others to wrest from, that [Page]which neither can long keep. For the covenant betwixt birth and death stands firm and inviolable; as that gives all things, this must return all bare and naked. This, I know, is meer folly to hardened Li­bertines, that look not beyond the fading pleasures of this life; but not to melting Chri­stians, who believe, and are assured, that Heaven is a Re­ward, a Gole, a Crown; which are not to be atchieved by sitting still, by leading a licentious and inordinate life, but by flying evill, overcom­ing temptations, doing good and vertuous acts. Take heart therefore, (brave Champi­ons) [Page]and be not daunted: for your greater comfort and in­couragement, rest assured that God is with you, yea, mar­shalls the very field you fight in; and when he sees it for your spirituall advantage, he will either cause a retreat to sound, that you may have a time of breathing in this world; or crown you with victory, that he may have just cause to reward you in the next. Then your persecutors will be at a stand, have no more to say to you, and your troubles will be at an end, your mourning out, your cries and sighs cease, your grie­vances heard and redressed, [Page]your teares dried up, the sweat of your browes wiped away; and finding your ex­cessive gain, unspeakeable joy will seize your hearts, and make you glad, that you had the grace and courage, to suffer for so good and graci­ous a God. For my part, I shall ever acknowledge your greatness, admire your glory, and from your goodness raise to my self a hope, that you will dart a ray, to quicken and cherish these my indeavours, whereby you will add an ob­ligation to my being.

Your devoted Friend and Servant, L. P.

To the Reader.

Good Reader,

OF many Religions professed in this land, severall Writers (men of approved integrity and pro­found learning) have so clearly de­monstrated, that there is onely one true, and that the Roman is it; that I cannot but impute the unge­nerall acknowledging of the same to prejudice, or impatience of labor: To prejudice, in them that have read their works, and yet do not be­lieve accordingly: To impatience of labor in others, that will not bestow the paines to turn over great vo­lumes. The best remedy for that sort of men is, to implore the Divine Goodness for cleane and unbiass'd hearts; without which it is not possi­ble to behold the radiancy of Truth: For this, J have endeavoured to draw Catholike Belief into a nar­row [Page]room, as a vast world into a small Map; to the end, that with a little travails much may be discovered. Jn pursuance where­of J shew in the first place the end of man; in the next, the will of God, and the means which he hath appointed to attain to this end. Then I evince the weakness and vanity of such pretences as divers make to this and other means. Lastly the true Church appears in her right colours. And for as much as Truth shines bright­er by opposition, after the manne [...] of contraries, the mainest Objecti­ons of Adversaries are propose [...] and solved. By all which, if Go [...] prove to be glorifyed, and you rea [...] benefit, I shall have the return [...] desire and wish, my aime being [...] other than Gods Glory, and you [...] good.

THE Right Religion re­veiw'd, &c.

CHAP. 1. Of happinesse.

1 THE severall knowledges of things within and a­bove the reach of Rea­son, are sufficient. Evidences, that there is a naturall, and a su­pernaturall state; in both which, God is the beginning and end of all.

2. In the naturall: for who is so [Page 2]short-sighted, that doth not see that what hath been, & is at this present existent and visible, was not alwayes so? That then it could not produce it selfe out of the void state of nothing; and by consequence that it needed an active Beginning, that never was nothing, and ever something, whereby to bring nothing to ex­istence and being. And who so stupid, that doth not feele want, or satiety in the possession of whatsoever is created or made? Honours expose as Cedars on Hills, to the boysterous storms of Envy and malice: lift up high to make the fall greater: Riches oc­casion dangers; beget, dropsie-like, new longings; rack the thoughts day & night with care of keeping, apprehension of losing. Pleasures if they stay, glut: gone, [Page 3]leave behind them sadnesse and remorse. Health is beset on all sides; contraries lying perpetu­ally beating, and knocking at the four humours, to let in distemper. Strength, be it never so vigorous, is at length weakened, and jaded by motion and labour. Beauty fadeth away; Age (the canker-worme of mortality) gnawerh her sleek smoothness into roughnesse and wrinkles. The faculties and ha­bites live in dependence of action; and action it self is not quite free, being penned up and imprisoned within us. All under God hath a mixture of ill; carrieth in its honey a certaine sting, that none draw neer, but they meet with displeasure. A forcible argument that the end of creatures abide out of themselves; where all perfections abounding, sweet conten [Page 4]and rest is to be found: and that is God.

3 In the supernaturall: by rea­son here is greater lack of ayd; more might and power required: the effects being greater, and of a farre nobler Kind. And if God was so charie and sparing of his honour, as not to let passe the or­daining of nature to himself; much more grace. Whence it is cleer, all flow from God, as streames from the sea; and are indowed with an innate or ingrafted Pro­pension, to return back to him a­gain. Now the happiness of every thing consisting in content, and rest, and content and rest, in the injoying of its end; it followeth in man that there is a capacity of double happiness, na­tural & supernatural: he being ca­pable of injoying God as he is the [Page 5]Author and end of nature, where­in consists naturall happinesse; and as he is the Author and end of grace, wherein consists super­naturall happinesse.

4 But as nothing would have remained without Being, Except God had stretched forth his omni­potent hand to bestow it; so posses­sed of Being, its bent and inclinati­on must take effect by his graci­ous leave & appointment: in re­gard, he is to prescribe the means to an end, that is the Author and cause of the desire thereof, where­fore, whosoever desires to arrive safely at the blessed port of happi­nesse, must banish far all self-con­ceit; and steer by no other Com­passe, than that God hath touchd'; so may they saile right; els their course will be evermore crooked and desperate; untill they doe run [Page 6]themselves upon the Rocks and Shelves of utter perdition.

CHAP. 2. Of the will of God.

PHilosophers assure it for a very truth that the first of every kind, is the rule of the rest in the same kind, and they are strongly back'd by reason; for the nearer a thing draws in likenesse to its first, the more perfect it is, and so held to be. Whence may be easily gathered that the known Will of God is the rule Para­mount of all kinds, as well natu­ral and humane as supernaturall, because it was (as hath been pro­ved) before them all as Author & causer thereof. I said known, in re­gard knowledg is so necessary & requisite to the compleating of a [Page 7]Rule, that wanting, it hath not right to challenge compliance. Now this knowledg coming from Propension, instinct, reason, tra­dition, or revelation, Propertie of speech will yeild proof sufficient that Propension and instinct are the light of naturall things, rea­son of humane, tradition of reve­lation, and revelation of superna­tural, forasmuch as none, meaning to be understood will deliver themselves, that the Elements hold their severall places by in­stinct, that Beasts prosecute their ends by discourse, that men attaine to what is past, and to be be­lieved without tradition and re­velation: Undoubtedly had not Christ revealed a consistencie of Trinitie with Vnitie, a possibility of Hypostaticall Vnion, and tra­dition brought this revelation [Page 8]down to us, these Mysteries would have been as terra incognita, not so much as ever dreamed of, Quis cognovit sensum Domini? Rom. 11. so as to speak intelligibly and with truth, the will of God be­comes known in things void of sense by propension, insensible by instinct, inhumane, as to pre­sent action, by reason, as to action past by tradition, in beliefe by revelation. Alwayes provided, concerning reason, that it be cleer of passion, and strong, for in case of byas & weakness, every one is to submit to the wise and perfect, it being but meet that they that see should have the Guidance of those who are in darkensse, least the blind leading the blinde both fall into disorder. It onely re­maines there being an ordinary and an extraordinarie Will, to de­termine [Page 9]how they are to be ob­served. In short thus, if they agree, obedience ought to bee yeilded to both, if not, the extra­ordinary must take place; Christ commanding the same with his father was equally to be obeyed, the Israelites according to the extraordinary will immediately re­vealed unto them, might lawfully destroy the Cananites, all others were bound to observe the ordi­nary will of love and peace, be­cause God onely having the ob­solute soveraignty can command at pleasure lives and fortunes.

CHAP. 3. Of the way to happinesse.

1 SIth God hath manifested his power by creating Man, and his goodnesse by wil­ling him a double happinesse; doubtlesse he hath not been back­ward to shew likewise his wis­dome in contriving the meanes to bring it to passe, and his provi­dence in making the meanes dis­cernable: otherwise he had wil­led an impossibility and in vaine: for an end is not possible without a meanes; and a meanes is to no purpose, unlesse it may be known. Now the meanes to an end requi­ting proportion and fitnesse to the end it is ordained to; as the end of man is twofold, naturall and su­pernaturall, [Page 11]the meanes whereby he is to attaine to these ends must be so to.

2. Sutable unto which, God hath appointed the meanes to mans naturall happinesse to be acts of his understanding & will, for by them he may seeke and finde out God, as he is the au­thor and end of nature; by these cleave and unite, and so injoy him. To mans supernaturall hap­pinesse, to be a conformity of faith to the Church; a conformity of hope to our Lords Prayer; and a conformity of Charity to the Commandements. A conformity of faith: without faith it is im­possible to please God, Heb. 11. He that believeth shall be saved; He that believeth not shall be condemned, Mar. 16. To the Church. Going, teach ye all na­tions; [Page 12]he that heareth you heareth me, Math. 16. He that hear­eth not the Church, let him be as a Heathen and a Publican. A con­formity of hope. Hope in our. Lord, Psalm. 43. Blessed is the man who hopes in him, Psalm. 2. To our Lords Prayer. When you pray let it be our Father &c. Matth. 6. Thus shall you pray, Our Father, &c. Luke. 11. A conformity of Charity. If I give all to the poor, and have not cha­rity, it profiteth nothing, 1 Ioh. 3. To the Commandments. This is the charity of God, that we, keepe his Commandements, Ioh. 14. If ye love me, keepe my com­mandements, Ioh. 15,

3. By the first conformity Man comes to the knowledge of God, as he is the Author and end of Grace; by the second relies up­on [Page 13]his mercy and goodnesse, that in due time he will grant and give those good things, which Christ hath taught us to ask in his pray­er: in the last he is taken with the beauty of his divine perfections, and so in joyes him in a higher, and more eminent manner. Both Happinesses in this life are imper­fect, by reason of the glimmering light Man onely hath of God, du­ring the same, they will be com­pleated and perfected in the next; When Man, after a willing com­plyance with Gods grace in this, shall see him, not as in a looking glasse, 1 Cor. 13. but face to face, as he is in himself.

CHAP. 4. Of the diversities of faiths, hopes, and charities:

1 IT is demonstrable, that there are divers sortes of Faiths, Hopes, and Charities; as ha­bituall and Actuall Divine, Ha­bituall and Actuall Humane: for some believe, hope for, and love supernaturall things, with the same, if not more eagernesse and fervency, than naturall; which Actions suppose, (as effects their proper and proportioned causes) supernatutall qualities: naturall not being able, (in re­spect of their meaner extract on and dignity) to give such noble births. Those are called divine, because infused by Gods extraor­dinary power: these humane; for [Page 15]that they are acquired by the strength of nature.

2. The Habituall divine are the supernaturall qualities them­selves; The Actuall divine are acts of the will of understanding, as raised and enabled to a higher pitch by those supernaturall qua­lities: The Habituall humane are the acquired qualities themselves, the Actuall humane are acts of the will and understanding, as inclined and fitted for act on by those acquired qualities. The Ha­bituall and Actuall divine differ further from the Habituall and Actuall humane in their materi­all and formall objects; as also in the Means, whereby those seve­rall objects come to knowledge; the materiall of Habituall and actuall divine being revealed Truths; the formal, Revelation: the [Page 16]materiall of habituall and actuall humane, unrevealed Truths; the formall the light of Reason, pri­vate reading or information. The meanes of habituall and actuall Divine, the Tradition of the Church, of Habituall and actuall humane the light of Reason, pri­vate reading or information.

3. Now forasmuch as Christi­anity is a supernaturall building, contrived and framed by the wis­dome of God, to last for ever, of which Faith is the foundation; Hope the walls, and Charity the Roofe and perfection: The con­formities expressed in the prece­dent Chapter are to be understood of divine Faith, Hope & Charity, and not of humane; because all nature joyn'd & gather'd in one, is not able to make a Being above Nature. And these are the vertues [Page 17]call'd Theological, as having God immediatly for object; the harmo­nious Sisters, three in number, but one in affection: none desiring that which displeaseth other. Greatness is their essentiall attri­bute, yet Charity excells. St. Paul 1 Cor. 13. compares them together, extolls them all, but in the close gives unto Charity the prehe­minence. And not undeservedly, for she is the enlivening soule of Faith, and Hope, and all the moral vertues: both they and these be­ing (out of her company) as dead bodies, without life or motion, as to heaven and Eternity.

CHAP. 5. Of the Churches power and infallibilitie in mat­ters of Faith.

1 SUpposing it for granted' that Christs knowledge of Gods reaveled truth, and his power to convey the same to beliefe, raised his preaching & teaching to the full height and perfection of a Rule of beliefe to the first Christi­ans; it cannot in reason be denied, he having communicated his said knowledg and power to the Apo­stles, & in them to the succeeding Churches, (as appears by his own words. All I have learnt of my fa­ther, I have made known unto you, Joh. 15. As my father sent [Page 19]me, so I send you, Joh. 20.) but she may challeng a like interest and right in respect of after-Christians: whence it followeth, that all matters of Beliefe (as well other points as scripture) are to be taken upon her accompt and ciedit, and that whatsoever comes upon any other score, is to be re­puted Apocryphall, and no way appertaining to the Obligation of Beleife.

2. St Paul declares this truth unto the Ephesians, assuring them, that they are builded upon no other foundation than the Apo­stles and Prophets, Eph. 2. like­wise to the Thessalonians, 2. Thes. 2. and Timothy, 1 Tim: 6. bidding them hold the traditions, and keep the depositum: and, again, if an Angell from heaven shall Evangelize any other, than [Page 20]what I have Evangelized to you, let him be accursed. Gal. 7. The reason is cleare; because the Rule of Beliefe, is the Measure of be­liefe, beyond which there is not any conformity, or obedience due from Beliefe.

3. The usuall colour for belie­ving more or lesse than the Church alloweth of, grounded upon her pretended subjection to Errour, is vain; inasmuch, as that very Christ that stored her with knowledge of Gods revealed truth, and with power to convey the same, hath also indowed her with inerra­bility, whereby to convey it safely, and without danger of miscarrying, by arming her proof aginst all the enemies of truth: against ignorance, Mat. 13. To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of hea­ven: [Page 21]against darknesse, Mat. 6. you are the light of the world: against Errour and falshood; Joh. 14. I will send unto you the spirit of truth, to remaine with you for ever. Jsaah 62. thou shalt no more be called forsa­ken: against Weaknesse, 1. Tim. 3. she is the Pillar and ground of truth. Mat. 16. Hell gates shall not prevaile against her. To make which good, and the worke sure, Christ called his eternall father to his aid, prayed him, and was heard for his reverence, Heb. 5. And to prevent and cut off all occasi­ons of imagining; that these fa­vours bestowed on the Church were not to survive the Apo­stles, for a continuance in the suc­ceeding Church, Christ adds, Be­hold I am with you all dayes to the end of the world Mat. [Page 22]28. soe as it must be said; that either Christ was not of power to keep his Church from straying, or that he wanted fide­lity to make good his word.

4. The certanity divine faith requires to build on, is a further Evidence of the Churches infal­libility, for how is it possible, Faith can be certain, if the Church that is to ascertain it, be uncertain and fallible? look on the Churches composure and na­ture, and her strength will ap­pear yet more, by reason she is framed and made up of men, dis­persed and spread over the world, who by this meanes, being of seve­rall Nations, different tempers and interests, neither could, nor can meet or conspire to Cheat themselves and posterity with a lie. That men of themselves are [Page 23]apt to mistake and deceive is from the purpose. So the evangelists might have fallen short of per­forming their taske. But as God holding their hands, and guiding their pennes, his holy word was truly and infallibly coucht on the sacred leaves of the Bible; so assisting and strengthening his Church, she becomes in all mat­ters concerning faith powerfull and infallible.

God is not tyed to this or tother; he is free to worke his wonders; where when and to whom he pleaseth. Neither is there any disproportion betwixt men thus assisted and infallibility; it being not necessary for the production of a supernaturall effect, that every part of the total cause be superna­tural; for it is visible to the eye that God frequently makes use of se­condary [Page 24]causes, in the production of supernaturall effects: in that of faith, Rom. 10. of hearing and preaching; in that of Grace, Mat. 18, 19, of Elements and words, in that of the blind man. Jo. 6. of spittle and earth.

CHAP. 6. Of the possibilitie of keep­ing the Comman­dements.

1 NOt onely that it is possible to keep the Commande­ments, but also that divers have kept them, is a truth so cleerly delivered, both in the old and new Testament, that there is cause to wonder, any can make question thereof. In the old, Moses speak­ing [Page 25]of the Commandments sayes, Deut. 30. They are not above but very near us in our Mouths, in our hearts to doe them. Noe Ezekias, Josi­as, Josaphat, Asa, Gen. 6. 4 Kings 18. 2 Paral. 30. 4 Kings 22. 1 Paral. 15 2 Paral. 20. Tob. 2. Iob 1.17. 2 Kings 7. 3 Kings 9. Luke. 2. Mat. 11.21. Luke. 1. Joacham, Tobias, Job, kept them. In the New, Christ is no lesse plain, My yoke is sweet, my burden light. Si­meon, St John the Baptist, Zacharias, Elizabeth, the B. Virgin kept them. Gods conditional promises to Da­vid and his Posterity could be termed no better than Jeers, unlesse the commandements were possible. To what purpose so much perswasion in Books and Pulpits to live well, if the Com­mandements [Page 26]be impossible? is living well any other than keep­ing of the Commandements? It is assuredly as rid culous as impious to tearm him a good liver that steales, murthers, and commits adultery, &c. The justness of lawes, that inflict severe punish­ments vpon the breakers of the Commandements, are not at all consistent with the impossibility of keeping them. Necessity is a good and forcible excuse against the strongest charge. The very light of Reason giveth testimonie to the Commandements possibili­ty, they being all grounded upon Reason, and suited to her bent and inclination: The wickedest man alive cannot say with truth that he breaketh any Command­ment without some secret check of conscience.

2. To alledge, that God onely requires mans indeavour, is re­pugnant to Christs express words, which are not, Mat. 19. If thou wilt come to heaven, endeavour to keep, but keep the Comman­dements. Many a good endea­vour, as many a good purpose, burns in Hell. Heaven being the reward of doing, not of endea­vouring. Besides it is equally un­naturall to endeavour impossibi­lityes, and to desire things un­known. Who could Choose but smile, to see one leap and skip, as ayming to soar & fly in the Ayr, knowing it to be possible onely for Birds that are fitted with wings and feathers for the purpose? In­deed to point at any particular, that doth keep the Commande­ments is hard; no man knowing. Eccles. 9. whether he be worthy [Page 28]of love or hatred: But that all in generall may keep them, Christ himselfe assures it, 2. Tim 2. Willing all to be saved. God wills nothing impossible, and he that wills the end wills the meanes.

3. True it is, neither Men nor Angells can love God as he is loveable, that's a perfection God onely is capable of; nevertheless it is in the power both of Angells and Men, to love God so far forth as the capacity of their condition reacheth, which, though it be a perfection of a lower degree, ye [...] it is sufficient to denominate, and render the subject it is in perfect And even this I confess, is a [...] effect which Gods grace hath [...] chief hand in; but that is no Ba [...] for Man having his share to Grace and Nature are not incon­sistent; [Page 29]yea, Grace supporteth, nay, bettereth Nature: they may then joyn and endeavour together, as two of unequall strength drawing a boat, one draweth more, but yet both draw. The part Grace acts in the working of salvation is to enlighten the understanding, move and enable the Will: The part Man acts is to comply with Grace, Cor. 6.1. to yield and consent to her good Motions, Apocj. 3.20. Wherefore salvati­on is the work not of Grace alone, nor of man alone, but of Grace and Man joyning hand and heart together. St Austin (Tom. 10. Serm. 15. de verb. Apost. post. med.) speakes truth, He that made you without you, will not justifie you without you.

CHAP. 7. Of Religion.

1 SUch is the dread of Gods awfull Majesty imprinted in Man, that the most bar­arous people, deem it a duty to set apart some time to worship him in; the light of reason teach­ing, that a certain return of ho­nour and veneration is due from the effect to its cause, whereby to express subjection, gratitude and thankfullness: and albeit impiety wants not Proselites, that reject­ing the Deity refuse to do him homage; their folly is to be im­puted to lack of grace, and not o [...] the said light, as appeares by readiness (observeable in them) to suffer for their opinion. If th [...] other world yield no Punisher, n [...] [Page 31]Rewarder, no Hell, nor Heaven, it is madness to fear, and vain prodigality to give away life, the chief good, and best flower of na­tures garden.

2. This naturall propension to praise and magnify God begets re­ligious acts, and Religious acts, that great moral vertue called Re­ligion: but Religion in a more com­mon acception consists in Beliefe, not humane, grounded upon Rea­son, but divine, relying on the Churches Authoritie, and the assistance of the holy Ghost. It is the doctrine of Christ delivered by himself in plain and express terms. Mar. 16. All power is given to me in heaven and in earth, goe ye therefore and preach the Gospell unto all nations; hee that believeth shall be saved, [Page 32]he that believeth not shall be con­demned. Jo. 14. I will send unto you the holy Ghost, who shall teach you all Truth. Christ here speakes to the Apostles the Church; giveth power to preach the Gospell to the Apostles the Church, promiseth salvation to Believers of the Apostles the Church, threatens damnation to unbelievers of the Apostles the Church: lastly (that there may be no pretence for disobedience) he assureth to the Apostles the Church a peculiar assistance of the holy Ghost, whose proper effect is to keep power from excess and failing.

3. Not a word of or to Reason; what colour then for attributing so much to Reason, and so little to the Church, as to deny Christ to have intrusted her with his [Page 33]Truth? as if the Gospell were not Christs truth, or Christs im­powering the Church to preach the Gospell, meant any other thing, than to intrust her with his truth. Had Reason the pre­heminence of Belief, St Paul would not have subjected Reason unto Belief, bidding all captivate the understanding to the obedi­ence of Faith, 2. Cor. 10. Indeed to give Reason the guidance of Belief, were to make the blind lead the blind, Mat. 15, For asmuch as Reason is at a losse in the object of Belief, and in Belief it self: the hottest zealots of Reason, having come short of the one and the other, witness the Manichees, and other Heretiques. The Rea­son is, because both are above Reason, as being high mysteries, and revealed so long since. But [Page 34]Christianity is not against Rea­son, and he is to be reputed silly and light, that hasteneth upon a truth, Eccl. 19. however propo­sed, without examination of its credibility and consistence with Nature, which must be the work of Reason; very true, nay more, Belief is beholding to Reason, even for discerning and finding out her guide, the true Church. But this onely amounts to an evidence, that Reason helps and contributes to belief, so doth preaching, reading; hearing, &c.

4 To be the guide of Belief re­quires further ability and skill, to lay open immediately to Belief Gods revealed Truth, a Preroga­tive belongs to the Church, and no other; as to whom alone re­velation was made. Whence [Page 35]it followeth, that the Religion of Sectaryes is deficient & vain, their belief being grounded upon some humane respect, and not upon the authority of the Church: and assistance of the Holy Ghost. And consequently that for them to de­serve the name of true Chrstians, and to be styled of the right Reli­gion, their onely way is to level at a perfection, that takes its rise from an absolute resignation of their wills to the will of God, in order to the Church; which ac­cording to Christ is to become spiritually little ones, Mat. 18. in resemblance to naturall Chil­dren, who are at best, when they most follow and obey their Pa­rents directions and commands. Hilar. in Mat.

CHAP. 8 Of the Unity of Religion.

1 IT is an undoubted Maxime amongst all that have any insight in nature, that Being and Unity are inseparably to­gether; insomuch, that where Be­ing is, there Unity cannot be wan­ting. If then there be any such thing as Religion, appointed by God for the salvation of soules, without all peradventure, it is one: Christ himself cleares the difficulty, saying, One sheepfold and one Pastor, Jo. 10. St Paul. declares no lesse to the Ephesi­ans, willing them to affect unity, to the end that they may bee as one Body, one Spirit, one Faith, one Baptisme, as God is one, [Page 37] Ephe. 4. And again, He gave some &c. Untill we all meet in the unity of Belief?

2. Now experience shews, that this unity of Religion, is an effect of acknowledging the Church for the Rule of Belief, it being visible to the eye, that all that square their Belief to the Church, are one in Religion; whereas they that take to themselves other rules dissent and jarre; of which no other reason can be given, but that the Church is all wayes con­stant and certain in her procee­dings, and clear in her expressions; other Rules, subject to uncertain­ty, change, and obscurity. The fix­edness of the severall Centers of fire and water inclines that to a constant ascension, and this to a like descension. That Pilot were guilty of much ingratitude and in­jurious [Page 38]to the Polars, that should not yeild the guidance of the Ocean to the regularness of their motion. Contrariwise it is a plain demonstration, that the inequali­ty of dayes and nights relates wholly to the wavering progress of the Sun: for every cause give­ing that it hath, and no more; as certain effects of one and the same kind hold dependance of constant and certain causes, so uncertain effects of many and divers kindes, must needs belong to unconstant and various causes.

3. True it is, that Scripture in it self, that is, as it is the word of God, dictated by the holy Ghost, is certain and infallible; but to us, to wit, as it is lyable to this and t'other private interpretation, it is as uncertain and fallible, as man. Witness the many contra­ry [Page 39]interpretations we se dayly made of Scripture, which cannot possibly be all true: wherefore the conclusion issueth abundant­ly, that the Church is the onely fit Principle to unite Christians together, and consequently, that those may despair of ever wearing the Badg and Ornament of true Chrstianity, viz. unity, who dare with Core and the rest of that rebellious Crew, bid defyance to the Church: Num. 16. Jude. 11.

CHAP. 9. Of the goodnesse of the Ro­man Cotholique Religion.

1 IF Excellency of nature and sweetness of disposition be ground enough to term a thing good, the Roman Catho­lique Religion may not unjustly claym that appellation. For first in her nature she is made up of Excellencies, acknowledging a God Eternall, Almighty, Provi­dent, Wise, Good, Just, Maker & Govern our of heaven & Earth, One in nature, three in persons, Father, Sonne and Holy Ghost, the Sonne to have taken hu­mane flesh, whereby to converse [Page 41]with man, to instruct and free him from the Bondage of Hell and sinne, to have instituted seven Sacraments to supply the necessi­tyes of his spirituall life: Bap­tisme that he might be regenerate, Confirmation that he might grow strong and able to profess his Faith before his enemies; the Eucharist that he might be fed with di­vine grace, Penance that his Maladies and sores of sinne might be cured and healed, Extream unction, that he might be comfor­ted in his last Agony against the usuall assaults of the Divell, Holy Order, that he might be provided of spirituall teachers and Guides, Matrimony that he might be multiplyed in a holy and sacra­mentall way: that he hath an endless store of bliss and happiness to reward the good, and a like of [Page 42]pain and misery to punish the bad, that he hath chosen and establisht some to propose and apply all those good things to others: Now for her disposition it is also good, teaching to love God above all, our Neighbours as our selves, to make an hearty and ready ex­pression of both; of the former, by laying down wealth, honour, liberty, yea, life it self rather than offend him, by building Churches and Oratories to praise and serve him in, by adorning and enrich­ing them for the better stirring up of devotion and reverence, by re­taining and holding dear things appertaning to him or his, by set­ting a part dayes to remember his favours and benefits, by wor­shipping him for his own sake with supream, his servants and beloved for his sake with inferiour [Page 43]honour, by abhorring all manner of Idolatry: of the latter by bea­ring in juries, leaving revenge to God, by forbearing even the least wrong, and if any be done, by making full reparation and a­mends, by perswading not for­cing Religion, by relieving the poor & needie with foundations of Hospitalls, Almshouses, Col­ledges &c. by keeping faith with all, especially Magistrates be they Catholiques, or Sectaries, Christi­ans or Infidells, good or bad, and that for very Conscience sake. These are the Roman Catho­liques tenets, and howbeit they admit of more, yet none being (what ever ignorance or malice hath noised to the contrary) in­consistent with these, and conse­quently agreeable to all sorts of Governments; that State or Com­mon-wealth [Page 44]that refuses to pro­tect and defend them from vio­lence, and oppression appeares clearely wanting to its interest in not complying with Prudence and Iuffice, which bid to love and cherish all safe and fast subjects. O but Catholiques have a depen­dance on the Pope, who is a for­raign Prince, they haue so, but not as he is a temporall Prince, for so he is confined within certain territories of Italy and France, their relation to him is onely as hee is their common spirituall Father, whose office be­ing to keep off Rebellion, and to teach obedience, cannot endanger the least. St Peter and the rest of the Apostles were forreigners to severall Provinces, the interest of Christ brought them to, yet in re­gard their power was spirituall, [Page 45]the Civill Magistrate had no cause to fear, but rather to rejoyce, as at a Good drawing towards them. God having given the spirituall power as the soul to the body for comfort and support, not for hurt or anoyance: what say you then to the practise of severall Popes: I say that Popes may prevaricate and exceed their Commission, and in case they doe that, they are to stand by themselves: I, & strange cases are maintained, by some which seem to induce to murder, theft, lying, cases appertain not to religion but to action, whose rule is reason, and not revelation, for God hath not revealed all belong­ing to charitie, as he hath in rela­tion to Faith Now reason being in most men weak and by ast by passion or interest, what cause is there so much to wonder at the [Page 46]strangeness of conclusions resul­ting thereof; the worst can be inferred hence is that sectaries seem void of reason, that make reason the rule of their belief, which is so defective and uncer­tain in the reach, even of naturall, and morall truths. Then the stewes are allowed in severall places. A clear mistake, they are onely permitted, that is not hin­dred or punisht, for no Catho­licke approves of Whoredome, as an act well done, which is the pro­per signification of allowing: now not to hinder or not to punish some kind of sinne, at least wise in certain causes is not ill, or if it be, how can God bee good, who per­mitts all manner of sinne? Nay, the forbearance to is but from vio­lence, there being all the sweet and charitable meanes used to [Page 47]take off of that lew'd way, as pious exhortations, godly sermons, offers of entertainment in Reli­gious houses founded of purpose for such as repent, lastly an assu­rance of an unchristian like buri­all to those that Dye impenitent. Further the Inquisition admits of no perswasion but her own. The Inquisition hath lesse relation to religion, than cases, being a meer peice of State Policy, as is appa­rant in France and Germany, where Catholicke Religion bea­ring the sway, the Inquisition is not at all owned, Protestants en­joying in both places as much freedome of Conscience as Catho­lickes themselves; At least wise it is not to be denied, that the Romish Religion allowes of Breaking of faith with sectaries, upon which accompt outrages [Page 48]have been committed. Most false! she abhominates all such doctrine as destructive to fidelity, which she magnifies as the ground of Iustice, Whence then this Monster? Mar­ry from ill composure, weak un­derstanding, depraved will: croo­ked nature prompts to ill, weak understanding conceives amisse, depraved will receiving erronious judgment for good and currant, musters her forces, stirs up Anger and hatred, which heightned, trample under foot all regard of Religion & vertue, and transports to disorder and mischief; so that ill composure, weak understan­ding, depraved will, wild passions and not Religion were the guilty, let them suffer and not those who in order to their Religion hate all barbarousness in opinion, keep under and curb unruly & naughty [Page 49]passions. It were a strang peice of Iustice to punish equally flyers and followers of Theft and Mur­ther, Scripture is express for every one to abide the shame of his own sinne: wherefore the concur­rence seemes generall to free and keep inocency from molestation and trouble.

CHAP. 10 Of the truth of the Roman Catholique Religion.

1 I Strange at the Partiality & inconsequence of those who Justify the Enemies of the Roman Catholique Religion, whiles they are in a readiness to condemne of folly & perversness; such as should goe about to call in question the conquest of England by William the Conquerour. I say I strange at it, in as much as the evidence of the conquest comes farre short of the evidence of the Roman Catholique Re­ligion, that amounting one­ly to an attestation from the oral tradition and history of Eng­land, whereas this, besides the oral tradition and history of Eng­land, [Page 51]hath the like testimony of France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Greece, Asia, and Affrica, all una­nimously witnessing that the Ro­man Catholick Religion was first taught and delivered by Christ, as may appear to any that will lay aside prejudice, & make a through enquiry of the truth. Whence re­sulteth, that if it be ridiculous and absurd to question the conquest, much more is it repugnant to rea­son to doubt of the Roman Ca­tholique Religion. Notwithstan­ding the Conquest is preferred by some as more evident, in regard it was never questioned, the Roman Catholique Religion often. What then? questioning is no mark of falshood, The Trinity, the In­carnation, the Scriptures have been all questioned, and yet are confessedly true: questioning ar­gue [Page 52]rather ignorance and malice in the Questioner, than want of truth in the thing questioned: whereto adde that the Ro­man Catholique Religion was sometime unquestioned, yea ac­knowledged for true even by them that afterwards questioned its truth. Others will oppose that the Pope bearing great sway in the world might and did first bring in the Roman Catholique Reli­gion; Christ bore greater, why not he? now that Christ and not the Pope did first teach & deliver the Roman Catholique Religion, Tradition both oral, and histori­call give testimonie, here is the proper proof of a thing done so many Ages past, their onely sur­mise and saying; can there be any Comparison in the desert of credit? but to shew further even [Page 53]an impossibility in these opposers assertion, I must observe unto them that the Rule of the Catholique Church is not the Popes pleasure; as they fondly imagine, but (as St Paul calls it) the depositum which importing to hold what was delivered, and to recieve no other for divine truth, could not but defeat this pretended Pope of all possibility of bringing in a Religion of his own coyning, for either he kept to the Rule of the Catholique Church, or he did not, if he kept to the Rule of the Ca­tholique Church, what he taught was delivered to him, and conse­quently not invented by him, if he did not, the generalitie of Christi­ans could not follow his example; because the universality of contin­gent causes is unchangeable, & be­cause Christ's iterated promises of [Page 54]the holy Ghosts assistance would not suffer it. Now the Roman Catholique Religion having been generally received for a divine truth, maketh it altogether im­possible for any Pope to be or to have been the first Contriver of it. What is further alledged in oppo­sition of Religion from perswa­sion, power and custome makes against other Religions which de­pend upon fancy (shewing that nimblenesse of wit & volubility of tongue may gain belief of such power grown terrible fright into a profession of the same, and custome give a good likeing and zeal of both; So Luther and Cal­vin perswaded their Novelties, Queen Elizabeth forced a professi­on of them, and custome rendred them to most seeming good, and [Page 55]true) and not against the Roman Catholique Religion that hath its relyance upon the certain uni­versality of Tradition, & Christ's never failing assurance of the holy Ghosts assistance, and which by reason of its austerity and strict­ness of its profoundness and in­comprehensibility, of its restless ayming at proficiency and growth in vertue and perfection, had to enter the lists and encounter with them all, with flesh and blood; as to which suffering and pain would be troublesome, and displeasing; with reason as to which heavenly mysteries would seem strange and mazefull; with power as to which new endeavours would be suspect­full and provoking: to Custome; as to which Change would be re­pugnant and destructive. To say truth, it is a clear demonstration [Page 56]of truth in the Roman Catholique Religion, that having to struggle with flesh and blood, with the bloody crueltyes of the fiercest Tyrants, it should be able maugre all their oppositions by meanes of a few contemplible men to prevail, so as to gain, and keep the Dominion and mastery of the cheifest and largest part of the Earth.

CHAP. 11. Of set Prayer.

EXtravagancies being simpton's and tokens of distemper, it is a plain case, that the traducers of set Prayer are not well at ease. For what more extravagant than to levell and strike at the very Acts of Christ and his Church as these doe, scripture declaring ex­pressely, that as well the one as the other have made and imposed set prayer; mark well the words. When ye pray Mat. 6. let it be Our father: loset prayer made and imposed by Christ. Have ye a form of sound words. 2. Tim. 1. Observe them that walk, so as you have our form: sing unto our Lord in Psalms, hymns & Canticles, Phil. 3 [Page 58]Here the Church in St Paul makes and imposes set Prayer; and as for their power in doing it, Christ sayes first for himself; All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. John. 14. next for the Church, Mat. 16. hee that heares you heares me, neither grant is li­mitted or restrained, and the end of both is to instruct in all Chrsti­an duty, therefore must needs reach prayer as a chief part there­of: I quarrel not with extemporary prayer in gifted persons, if all ought to improve their talents, why should any be debarred the use which is the meanes to im­provement? All I contend is, that Christians are to have a regard of decency and order, for that Christ (who is the God of order and not of confusion) came not to bestow the beautifull and pretious jewell [Page 59]of Christianity upon a confused and hell-like multitude, but upon a well ordered company, consist­ing of a perfect subordination of inferiours to superiours, amongst whom as there is a commanding power, so there is a duty to obey a power, being to small purpose; unless it can challenge observance. Nevertheless superiors having not tyed up all inferiours actions, but left some loose and free as extem­porary power &c, inferiours may pray at pleasure of their private store, so as they doe not passe their bounds to find fault and clash with superiours; it is not at all misbecoming a householder to order his family after his own mode, if it be done without opposi­tion to, or contempt of the lawes; but should the sun it self in its na­turall motion resist or thwart the [Page 60]common motion of the heavens, it must undoubtedly discompose & marre the melodiousness of their harmony. The Exception against set prayer that it hinders attenti­on and elevation, hath not the least ground, because extempora­ry prayer requiring study is rather apt to distract and beat down, whiles it seeks and dives to find out what to say, whereas set prayer, being made to our hands, needs no study, and consequently brings no such inconvenience.

CHAP. 12. Of the meanes to recon­ciliation with God.

HAving thus endeavoured to set forth a sound and good Christian, handsomeness of order requires to declare next a Remedy for such as are diseased and ill, in complyance wherewith I shall say, that Christ hath appointed repentance, as the onely safe and sure meanes to reconciliation, and doubtless so it is, for diseases as well spirituall as corporall are properly to be cured by contraries, and the Spirituall disease of an ill Christian in pride & malice, whose contraries are faith, humility, fear, Love, sorrow hope, purpose of a­mendment, confession and satis­faction, all which are the essenti­alls [Page 62]of Repentance; and being soe, argue desperateness in those that dare hazard their reconcili­ation upon confidence of forgive­ness, which rather sydes with than opposes their disease, as will ap­pear by stating the case betwixt man and man thus; a Master bearing affection to his servant bestowes on him favours and be­nefits, this servant instead of deser­ving growes savage and insolent, insomuch that he reviles and abu­ses his good Master, afterwards reflecting upon his ingratitude, calls to mind, his Masters worth, & thence raiseth to himself a con­fidence that he hath forgiven him. Clearly this proceeding is so far from lessening, that it increaseth this servants offence, as adding thereto presumption. Now Gods friendship surpassing mans imper­fection, [Page 63]the breach of it must be worse, and consequently a greater and more exact reparation is ne­cessary. It behooveth then every Christan desirous of spirituall health to beware of this imperti­nent and pernitious confidence, and when Conscience accuses of sinne, to take Christs Remedie as followeth: in the first place by way of Preparative, crave Gods assistance, then stir up an Act of humility by acknowledging your unworthiness, an act of faith by considering Gods omnipotence & veracitie, an Act of fear by con­sidering his severity in punnishing sinne, an Act of love by conside­ring his goodness in creating, pre­serving, redeeming and adopting you to be his Child, an Act of sorrow by considering his displea­sure and your losse, an Act of hope [Page 64]by considering his promises of mercy, which done make a firm purpose to doe so no more, con­fess your fault; and take upon you some Penance of Prayer, fasting or Almes-deeds in part of satis­faction for the injury offered. This way may benefit Christians of all perswasions, but can hurt none, because Religion, though it be above, yet it is not against rea­son, and prudence allowes you, encourageth the tryall of safe and harmless meanes: great affaires seldom complain of too much care and diligence, there being in good no danger of excess. And here it will not be unseasonable to ob­serve the unjustness of sectaries, who impute easiness to Catho­liques, avouching that according to their Religion, a bare confessi­on of sinns to a Preist pacifies [Page 65]and appeases God, whereas besides confession, (not to speak of its horridness & a verseness to nature) they hold as necessary all the other above mentioned Acts, that if any one bee wanting, their confessions become invalid and sacrilegious. Above all their strangeness breakes out in their complaint of uneveness in their way, as though it were such a matter to believe Christes merits who is the source and fountain of all worth, or to have a confidence in God whose goodness trascends all that can be sinne, and yet this is the very quintessence of their re­quisites to reconciliation with God, albeit their sinnes should swell to drown in loudness the cryes of Sodome and Gomorrha.

CHAP. 13. Of the Spirit of Spiri­tists.

1. THe spirit of God in God is as God, every where; I fill heaven and earth Jer. 23. So as in this sense none can be absent from his essence, presence, nor ver­tue. But the question runs of the effects thereof, which depending upon his will, are confined with­in narrower limits. This truth ap­pears bright in St Iohn, where he forbiddeth to give credit to every spirit, Jo. 1.4. To deny that the spi­rit of God is active & fruitfull in some, were to fall into another extream, and in effect to call Gods goodness & mercy in questi­on; [Page 67]to know and discern who they be, the onely way is to see their warrant, and examine their works. If their warrant prove that of Miracles, and their workes good, doubtless they have the fa­vour of Gods spirit; if otherwise, they are at the best but pretence makers, and ushers of innovati­on.

2. This way must needes be true and sure, because Christ and Saint Paul taught it, and it stands with right reason; for bare sayings with­out proof are sounds of want and emptiness; and the capacity of every Agent being to produce effects like it self, it is as impossible for the spirit of God (that is all goodness) to be the author of ill, as for a reasonable creature to beget an unreasonable, or heat to cause cold. Whence it is plain, [Page 68]that the spirit of Spiritists is a false imposture, a meer figment and delusion, in as much as it is desti­tute of Miracles, and induceth to ill; it perswading a disloyall defection from our Lords Prayer, the Commande­ments and Church;Bucer in Mat. 6. Calvin. in Mat. 6. Luther. de Moyse. Zuin­glius in explan. art. 16. Tindal in Fox his acts pa. 140. edit An. 1610. in the consonancy and dissonancy to which consist the goodness and bad­ness of all Actions. All actions being good or bad, accor­ding as they are conform or difforme to Gods known will, which is apparently manifested in the aforesaid. Hereto adde, that the spirit of Spiritists promp­teth things contrary and imcon­sistent each with other; Luthe­rans assert the reallity of Christs' [Page 69]body, Zuinglians maintain a bare figure, Calvinists differ from both, which cannot befall the spirit of God; for so the spirit of truth might become the spirit of Errour and falshood.

3. To say that God is no excep­ter of persons, that his spirit being free, may breath on whom he plea­seth, is out of the matter in hand; here being no dispute of Gods power, what he may doe, but of his will, what he doth. Their other ground for inspiration upon the assurance of Conscience, St Paul. and St Austin convinced long since of weakness and coze­nage. St Paul, when for yielding to Conscience in persecuting the primitive Christians, he acknow­ledged himself unworthy of the name of an Apostle 1, Cor. 15. St Austin, when he sharpned [Page 70]his pen against Manichisme, which before in obedience to Conscience he upheld and defen­ded. Conscience can have no greater certainty than the under­standing that gave it being; and the understanding, experience teacheth to be so bad an aymer, that in the search of truth, it oftner misses than hits.

CHAP. 14. Of the Spiritists Rule of faith.

1 THe Rule of faith may be considered in it self, or in respect of us; in it self it is Gods revealed truth; in respect of us, it is the same truth expressed to us. Thus far Catholiques and Spiri­tists agree, their difference is about the expression. These holding, that it is that of their private spi­rit joyned to that of Scripture onely; Those, that it is that of the Church, Scripture bearing wit­ness of her truth. This latter is clear, by what hath been already said in the third Chapter, and will appear yet more by disproving [Page 72]the former. Which for the first part, that it is false and spurious, Saint Peter gives evidence point­blank, 2. Pet. 1. No interpreta­tion of Scripture by private spirit. Saint Paul speakes to the same effect, where he wisheth (2. Cor. 10.) to captivate the understan­ding to the obedience of faith. And our Saviour confirms both testi­monies, obliging all under pain of damnation, Mat. 18.17. to be­lieve the Church. If the Church be to sway, every private spirit must stoop and obey; for none can serve two Masters, Luke. 16.

2. For the second, that it is defi­cient Scripture attesteth, referring to the Church, and reason makes it good. For as much as the ex­pression Faith requires, ought to be as full and ample, as the duty of Faith; that is, it must be able to [Page 73]informe the understanding in all it stands bound to give assent un­to; wherein the expression of Scripture alone is defective; it not declaring sundry pointes Christians acknowledge them­selves bound to believe. To wit, that those bookes of Scripture, which are received for Canonicall, are so indeed. That some are Ca­nonicall, other some Apocryphall. That they are determinately these or others. That the Jewes Sab­aoth is to be neglected and laid aside, and the Sunday solemnized. That the Creed is authenticke, and truely the Apostles. That it is lawfull to eate stra [...]gled meates and blood. But these men please themselves with onely talke of Scripture; for were Scripture (as they pretend) the Rule of their beliefe, though it containes divers [Page 74]truths; yet those truths meeting and becoming one in Revelation, they would all perfectly agree, not onely Lutherans among them­selves, Calvinists among them­selves, but likewise Lutherans with Zuinglians, and Calvinists with both; it being the propertie of unity to unite and make one all that conforme to the same: Whereas happening quite contra­ry, it is a manifest signe, that fancy, under specious pretences of Scripture & the Spirit, is the great Idol they do homage to; Luthe­rans to Luthers, Zuinglians to Zuinglius, and Calvinists to Cal­vin.

CHAP. 15. Of the Protestant Church.

Protestants cast a fairer shine than the Spiritists, and certes were their Church as true as it is seeming, they could not be justly taxed. But all is not gold that glisters, Satan is apt to transforme himselfe into an Angell of light, 2. Cor. 11. Falshood it self is not seldome seen in the habili­ments of truth; and therefore this Chapter pretends to lay o­pen the many shapes Protestants put their Church in, to make her pass for true.

1

The first is, Protestants are a company of Christans under the government of Bishops & Pastors, that have power and authority from Christ and his Apostles to administer the Sacraments, and preach the word of God: But such a company is the true Church, therefore Protestants are the true Church.

ANSWER

1 Neither Christ nor the A­postles ever conferred any power or Authority on Protestant Bish­ops and Pastors; they were dead and gone, long before these had any being. To give Power and Authority of this nature, requi­reth presence of the Giver: so was God present to Moses, Exod: 3. [Page 77] Christ to his disciples, Mat. 6.28. Neither is their any Testa­ment or Monument extant to shew that the power or Authority Christ bequeathed, should lye ob­scure and dead for such a tract of time, and then be brought to light and revived when Protestant Bishops and Pastors sprang up, or that it was for them.

2. It will be said, Christ and the Apostles shared their power to Protestant Bishops mediate­ly, immediately to those lived in their dayes; and those to others downe to these.

Repl. By this is implyed a con­tinuation of succession in the Pro­testant Bishops and Pastors, ever since Christ & the Apostles; it is not concievable any other way, how power could be trans­mitted from one hand to ano­ther, [Page 78]as is averred; as also a visibilite of the same; for as much as it was their partes to preach the word of God, and ad­minister the Sacraments; if visible, they may be produced, they ought to be produced: they may, because that power is vaine and fictitious, that is not reducible to act, Math. 5. They ought, because Bishops and Pastors in case of Controver­sy, are to give an accompt of their calling, Luke. 7. as well to settle the wavering, as to bend and make supple the stifness of stubborne misbelievers. 1 Peter. 3.

3. How necessary this is, Ter­tullian admirably well vrged,Lib de praescrip. Iren. adver. He­res. Hieron. in Lucifer. Optat. lib. 2. contra Parmen. when he bad the Sectaries of his time let him see the begin­ning of their Bishops & Pastors. Likewise [Page 79]Optatus, the Origin of your Chaire, shews yee, that needs will challenge to your selves the holy Church: St. Austin came not behind these in pressing the necessity of succes­sion and derivati­on,Augustin de u­tilit. credend. E­pist. cont. Fau­stum Manich. where he inge­nuously acknow­ledgeth them to be of force to hold & keep him in the bo­some of the Church. There keep­eth me, said that great Saint, in the Church, the succession of Priests from the very sitting of St. Peter, to whom our Lord after his Resur­rection committed the feeding of his sheepe, even to this present Bishop. And well did it become the Pious zeale of those ornaments & lights of Gods Church, to shew earnest­ness & vehemency in this behalfe, inasmuch as derivation of succes­sion [Page 80]is so proper to the true Church, that it cannot agree to any false, as, St. Hierom (in Mi­cam. 1.) observeth, assuring Secta­ries to have no such riches as come to men, by plain inheritance from their fathers: and as is evi­dent in it selfe; by reason the true Church was planted and esta­blished, before any false began: The Parable of the good man, sowing first good seed, and the ene­my over-sowing Cockle, evince no less, Mat. 13. Therefore must needs be a non plus ultra, a stopp & bar, betwixt whatsoever Coun­terfeit Church and Christ, to keep off the like continuation of suc­cession.

4. It will be said, if derivation of succession be a sure Marke of the true Church, Arians & Turkes may claim the true Church, [Page 81]Arians deriving themselves with­out interruption from Arius, and the Turks from Mahomet.

Repl: Arian and Turk deriva­tion climb not so high as Christ, it reacheth no further than Arius and Mahomet, who grew up long after Christ: the Argument from succession is not grounded upon any succession, but upon derivati­on of succession from the Apostles and Christ; and that holds good: because Christ was not onely man, but God also: and therefore had power to constitute a true Church; Arius and Mahomet were no more than men, who may not assume any such prerogative. So that derivation of succession from them onely demonstrates them to have been the Founders and beginners of Arianisme and Tur­cisme:

5. It will be said, divers Secta­ries were contemporary with Christ; therefore that argues Antiquity onely not Truth.

Repl. It may be severall Sectaries had the honour to see some part of the time Christ lived in, but not his institution, that was a speciall favour reserved for, & onely gran­ted to his deare spouse the Church. Sectaryes crept in after, as opposers of Christs institution.

6. It will be said, There have been named in severall ages the Albigenses, the A­postolici, Osiand. Epitom. AEn. Sylvius de gest. Bohem. Guid Carmel in Albi­gens. Antoninus Luxemberg. in paup. de Lugdun. Vspergens chron. 212. Cesar. Cistert. dial. 5. Vincent. specu­lum hist Prateolus. Sandeus. Wickliffe, Hus. Repl. None of these were Pro­testants, they hold­ing [Page 83]not in all points with them, nor yet with themselves, asis to be seen in Osiander, Aeneas Sylvius, and other approved Historians. Besides there was a great distance between them and the Apostles, in which they could not be men­tioned; for as much as they were not begun, or were quite extinct.

2

Another shape is, Luther descend­ed from Catholiques, Catholiques from the Apostles; therefore Pro­testants had their originall from the Apostles; they deriving them­selves uninterruptedly from Lu­ther.

ANSWER

1. Protestants derivation from Luther is frivolous, and of no weight; Luther wanting Episco­pall Authority, without which all Ordinations are null and frustrate; by the confessions of the cheif Protestants themselves: See Sa­ravia, Sutcliffe, Bilson, Andrews, White, Mason, Mountague, Hall and others.

2. It will be said, Luther recei­ved Episcopal power immediately from God. Repl. Such a power being extraordinary, is alwayes accompained with that of Mira­cles, as appeared in Moyses, Exod. 3. and the Apostles, Act. 2.14. Luther never wrought Miracle; neither did he ever pre­tend to any such gift, the season [Page 85]of Miracles (as some of his Disci­ples avouch) being than past. And for his wonders alleadged in drawing so many after him, mau­gre the Pope, Emperour, and other Potentates, it shews onely a strange itching in men after Novelties, & proneness to Liber­tinage. Arius in a shorter space lead away far more, and greater ones, (that to use Saint Hieroms words, cont. Lucifer.) the world did groan again, to see it self on a suddain become Arian. But this could be no Miracle; for Miracles are done for the asserting of truths, & it was most untrue, that Christ was not God, that he was not equall to his eternall father, as Arius contended.

3. It will be said, it was Mira­culous in the Apostles, to convert thousands to the faith of Christ, [Page 86]in a time of greatest opposition and resistance. Repl. In them it was, it being a work of too high a nature for the undertaking of poor illiterate men, to perswade a Re­ligion so contrary to flesh and blood, as mortification of Wills, Fasting, Chastity, &c. Luther was a man of learning and parts, who had onely to instil a doctrine acceptable and pleasing to the de­pravedness of nature; to perform which needed not abilities other than naturall.

3

A third shape is, Protestants re­ceived their Mission from Catho­lick Bishops in Queen Elizabeths dayes and since.

ANSWER.

1. If some did, which is to be proved, Nay the contrary seemes demonstrated by Doctor Champ­ney, it is evident the greater part did not; and what a Church must that company make, of which most are judged fit to preach the word of God, and administer the Sacraments without authority? But admit the calling of Pro­testant Bishops and Pastours were right in all of them, it would not follow that the Protestant Church is true, so long as she advanceth Protestanisme, contrary to the meaning of the Catholique Bi­shops, who never impowr'd any, but in relation to the setting up, and upholding of Catholique Religion.

2. Furthermore, Communion with the true Church being as necessa­ry a requisite to the making up of a true Church, as union of parts to the compleating of a naturall body; what colour for truth in the Protestant Church, that is at variance with the Catholique, of whom she gloryeth to have her power, and which she confesseth to be a true Church: whereto adde, that Protestants derivation from Catholiques, is not proof for a personall succession of Bi­shops, and Pastours agreeing in all points with Protestants, which ought to be the scope and ayme of that derivation: it being not re­quired of Protestants to deduce a succession from Christ and his Apostles of men meerly sent, but withall professing the doctrine maintained in the Church of Eng­land. [Page 89]For although doctrine be no mark of the true Church (as shall be shewn hereafter) nevertheless it is her inseparable Mate; inso­much that where true Doctrine is wanting, there the true Church cannot be; Christ having in­trusted her with his truth, and or­dained her keeper and preserver thereof.

3. It will be said, such a successi­on may be shewn, but mingled pale-male with Catholiques, as corn with chaffe, good fish with bad, conformably to Scripture; comparing the Church to a barn­floor, where there is corn and chaffe together, Math. 3. to a Net replenished with all sortes of fish, Math. 13. Repl. This mix­ture must have been either of Pro­testant and Catholique doctrine in the same company of men, ma­king [Page 90]profession of both, or in seve­rall companies; one professing one, another the other: It could not be the former, because that would be a clear argument that the Church hath erred; contrary to what was proved in the fift Chapter. Besides the name of Protestant to this company would be very improper, holding a Doct­rine inconsistent with the Pro­testant. Surely, whosoever over and above the Protestant Doctine, should profess the Arian, or Nesto­rian, would deem himself jeered and laughed at, to hear himself styled by the name of Protestant: Doctrine being in nature much like unto number, the least addi­tion or diminution altering its kind, and grounding a new deno­mination. Nor the latter, in as much as there is no agreement be­twixt [Page 91]the Temple of God and Idols, no concord with Christ and Belial. 2. Cor. 6. The Arke of God and Dagon may not stand together, 1. Kings. 5. It were a strange exam­ple, if the Church, unparaleld for love to her spouse, that professeth so much to truth, and strictly for­biddeth ill company (as dangerous to her Children) should receive into her company Lyers and In­novatours. This would leave a stain upon her reputation, make her sincerity be suspected, her Doctrine contemned and despised. But she who is, all fair. Cant. 6. Without spot or wrinkle. Epes. 5. is free from any such guilt; Secta­ries being as hideous and hatefull in her sight, as their suggestions are full of poyson and destructive to soules.

4. It will be said, Protestant [Page 92]Bishops and Pastours, were not so near mingled with Catholiques, as either to believe or profess their Doctrine; they onely con­cealed and covered their own, for fear of the formidable rigour of Catholiques. Repl. such Bishops and Pastours could neither be true, nor make a saving Church. Not true, because the Mission of true Bishops and Pastours being founded upon persecution and suffering (Loe, I send you as sheep among Wolves. Math. 10. Luke. 11.) it is proper for them to fear no colours: Cruelty in her gastli­est hue is not able to fright or daunt them from preaching the word of God, and administring the Sacraments. The Apostles gave testimony to this truth, when commanded by higher powers to forbear mentioning [Page 93]Christ or his actions, they bravely and with stoutness reported that they could not choose, but declare, What they had seen and heard; yea, even outraged and ill entreated for this behalf, they went away glad and rejoycing, to be thought worthy to suffer for the name of Jesus. Acts. 5. All the glorious Martyrs and Confessours confirm the same, by their profession of faith amidst the loathsome sten­ches of close Prisons; and horri­ble torments of bloody persecu­tours.

5. Nor make up a saving Church; by reason profession of Faith is necessary to salvation, Rom. 10. In heart it is believed to justice, by mouth profession is made unto Salvation. Mat. 10. He that denies me to men: I will denie him before my father &c. The [Page 94]Comparisons are meant of private men for matter of manners, & not of any mixture of true and false Doctrine, Orthodoxall & Hereti­cal Bishops & Pastours together.

6.

A fourth shape is, in all ages since Christ and his Apostles there have been Protestant Bishops and Pastours, but through the negli­gence of men, and hard fate of times, their names have miscarried and perish'd. And as it is no argu­ment, many famous Romans and Graecians are not named, there­fore never were any such men; so it is no less fals a sequell, Protestant Bishops and Pastours are not mentioned all the way from Christ and the Apostles, therefore they were sometimes wanting.

ANSWER.

1. It is not the same of private men, and of Bishops and Pastours: These have Christs Warrant and assurance for a Continuance of vi­sibility, so have not those, Math. 28. Bishops and Pastours are, as Aqueduces and Limbecks, through which the vivifying waters of Christs holy Doctrine are derived into our eares, and distilled into our soules, so are not private men: should they be at any time clou­ded, and in obscurity Christ would be worse than his word, his Doctrine fall short, and not come home to us.

2. It will be said, visibility is a badge private men wear as well as Bishops and Doctours; therefore it cannot be inferred more of the [Page 96]one than of the other. Repl. Visi­bility is not peculiar to Bishop and Pastours, but necessity of vi­sibility is; private men in this way of visibility, being onely con­tingently visible: So that though this inference be not right, they are visible men, therefore they are Bishops and Rastours; no more than that there are white fowle, therefore they are swans, white­ness belonging as well to Geese, Ducks Pigeons &c. Yet there are Bishops and Pastours, there­fore they are visible, holds good; as there are swans, therefore they are white fowl; in asmuch as visi­bility agreeth necessarily to Bi­shops and Pastours, as whiteness doth to swans.

3. It will be said, Divers Bi­shops and Pastours have been, whose names are not extant; [Page 97]therefore Bishops and Pastours have no stricter relation to visibility than private men; Repl. Bishops and Pastours are necessarily visible, either indeterminately, or determi­nately: indeterminately all; for some are necessary to make a visi­ble Church; determinately so many, without which there could not be a sufficient number to make a true visible Church: Even as Ships in respect of passing the Sea, all are necessary either indeterminately or determinately; indeterminately all, some being necessary to pass with, determinately so many, without which the Sea is not to be passed. Wherefore as the Antecedent is true, the Sequell is false; Bishops and Pastours having either indeter­minately or determinately a neces­sary Reference to this sort of visi­bility; private men onely an acci­dentall.

4 It will be said, Bishops and Pastours are necessarily visible, whil'st they live; dead, that necessi­ty ceaseth; Repl. Such a visibility would be to no purpose, it not pro­viding the Church of means to de­fend and make good her right in case of opposition; for the question of lawfulness in Bishops and Pa­stours, and of their truth in point of Doctrine, soaring as high as Christ, commonly be satisfied by a shewing of equall rise; which sup­poseth a visibility reaching from Christ to the end of the World as power to the Act. The question of the Churches Right is to be de­cided, not unlike that of two great men, laying claim to a Principality, by vertue of some pretended descent from a certain Prince, or to that of [...] River, whether it hath its of­ [...]ring from such a Hill or Moun­tain: [Page 99]For as to Evidence, this the surest way will be to derive their Pedigree, and to trace the River up to the Head; so to clear that, no means more effectuall, than to take a view of the ages gliding betwixt Christ and us. If Bishops and Pa­stours be found succeeding each o­ther without intermission, it is E­vident they are true and Catholick; if otherwise, they may not escape the brand of usurpation and intru­sion.

5. The Truth of Doctrine is discernable much after the same manner, If it be found to have no way varied, but to have kept its own from Christ and the Apostles, doubtless it is Orthodox, if not, most certainly it is new and false. In short, by the good help of this visibility, the Bishops and Pastours of Gods Church, together with his [Page 100]Doctrine, shine so bright through­out all ages since Christ, that who will open their eyes to see, and their mouthes to ask, may with ease finde whom to obey, and what to believe; for want of this visibility, Sectaries, boast they never so much of Antiquity, prove but of late creation, and their Doctrines fond devises of unsetled and wavering mindes.

5.

The last shape is, That Church is true and Catholick, which pro­fesseth the Apostles Doctrine, clearly delivered in Scripture; but the Pro­testants Church doth this, there­fore, &c.

ANSWER.

1. TRue Doctrine is no mark of a true Church, it being to be seen among Schismaticks, who for want of Communion are not able to make a true Church; Besides Doctrine is as divers, as there are divers seeming Churches, and so not affording any determinate mo­tion drawes in opposition of a mark of truth; to which adde that Do­ctrine supposeth Bishops and Pa­stours, as the means whereby it is conveyed unto us; For Doctrine comes not in the ayre, or by infu­sion, but by preaching and teaching of men, not only sent inwardly by inspiration, but likewise outwardly by ordination or imposition of hands, of such as have power, as the Priests in the old Law, the A­postles [Page 102]and their successors in the new were Exod. 3. Levit. 8. Math. 28. therefore it importeth as much to name Bishops and Pastours be­fore way be given to the mention­ing of Doctrine as it is necessary passing from one extreame to ano­ther; to touch first the middle. It is no less untrue that Protestants maintain the Apostles Doctrine de­livered in Scripture, inasmuch as they cleave to a sense which the words neither do, nor can beare without wresting & forcing, as Dr. Smith (late Bishop of Chalcedon) hath clearly shewn in his Collation; to which I must remit you for a­voyding of tedious quotations, as opposite to my professed brevity.

To be of the Apostle, belief, re­quires a full and entire admission of what they believed; For if belief of some points only were enough [Page 103]to make two of one belief; Ca­tholicks and Protestants, Turks and Jews might crack of unity in Religion, because though they differ in some points, yet in other some they consent and agree. Now Heaven being a reward only in­tended and promised where there is a full performance of Duty; belief of part of the Apostle Belief is as ineffectuall to Salvation as perse­verance for a time; which moved St Athan to say that he that did not hold the Catholick Faith in­tirely should for ever perish: And it is agreeable to reason, in regard punishment is the reward of con­tempt offered to Gods Majestie, which may be done as by trans­gressing any one Commandment, so by disbelieving any one point; Gods Majesty shining no less re­splendently in his veracity than in is Will.

It will be said Protestants agree with the Apostles in sundamentalls, which is sufficient to be of the A­postles belief, and to Salvation; Repl. There are two sortes of Fun­damentalls answerable to the two­fold precept of belief, affirmative; He that believes shall be saved; and negative, He that doth not be­lieve shall be condemned, Mar. 16. The first sort is points to be be­lieved, explicitly or in particular. as the Trinity, the Incarnation, &c. The second sort is points to be be­lieved, at leastwise, implicitly or in generall, as all points whatsoever relating to belief, both are Funda­mentalls, because both are necessary to Salvation, and both are necessary to Salvation, because both are e­qually grounded upon Revelation, whence ariseth the necessitie and ob­ligation of belief; Now admit it [Page 105]should be granted that Protestants agree with the Apostles in the first sort of Fundamentalls, that is in points necessarie to be believed ex­plicitly, according to the affirma­tive precept of belief (which may well be a question, they not be­lieving them upon account of the Church, but for fancie or some other humane respect) yet disa­greeing in the second sort, that is, in points necessarie to be believed, at leastwise implicitly, according to the negative precept of belief: How is it true that they do not disagree from the Apostles in fundamen­talls? It will be said those points, Protestants disagree in, were not revealed to the Apostles, Repl. It is manifest they were, there being the same light for the revelation of them, as there is for the revelation of the other; to wit, the Churches [Page 106]Tradition, which giving a like exi­dence of both, ought not to be deemed less sufficient for the latter than the former. It will be said be­fore Scripture had being, the power and right of declaring Revelation belonged to the Church, but since they were transferred and given to Scripture, so as now Gods Revela­tion is to be known thence without recourse to the Church, Repl. The power and right of declaring Gods Revelation were bestowed upon the Church, not for the Apostles time only, but for all the time after, for the Commission was not, each same, but all Nations, Mat. 6. which is not to be accomplisht till the end of the World, when the Jews shall be gather'd from their dispersion, and consequently imparts the fulness of him, that is to say, so long as this World [Page 107]lasteth, or there is time in being: It will be said, to what purpose then did the Evangelists set pen to paper? Repl. For more comfort to give Te­stimony of the Church and her sincerity in teaching, and not for e­very one to be his own carver and interpreter. St Paul is positive, let men esteem of us, &c. as the dispencers of Gods mysteries. 1. Cor. 4. It was ever held an effect of great improvidence, and an oc­casion of much confusion for the people in any state or Common-Wealth, to have the freedome and liberty of construing the Law; Therefore wise Lawmakers, to shew their care and foresight for the good and weal publick, as they cau­sed then Laws to be written, so did they appoint certain select per­sons of great abilitie and in egritie, to administer and dispense the same.

This being true, what an under­valueing must it be of Gods wis­dom and providence, to think that in a Commonwealth of his own im­mediate establishing, as the Church is, he hath left to all indifferently, a liberty to make what sense they please of his Law, on which, as on a shelf or Rock, her peace and safety would be in perpetuall danger of Wrack; The Jarres and Garboyles of Sectaries having scarce had any other source than the priviledge every of them took of reading and interpreting Scripture.

The Reason is clear, because all men are not apt to understand alike; for being for the most part of diffe­rent tempers and composures, they have various fancies, which of ne­cessity will beget a diversity of un­derstanding: Let twenty read and reason upon Scripture, and not re­late [Page 109]to some former exposition, and I dare be bold to say, that no two of them shall agree; Experience is my warrant in Luther, Zuing lius, Calvin, who for all their reading and reasoning, made no less than three contrary and repugnant senses of those plain words; This is my Body, This is my Blood.

10. It will be said, those se­lected persons, intrusted with the administring and dispensing of the Laws, utter by mouth what they understand, and they understand no more than what their private reading and reasoning are able to inform them, so that even this way man would be to seek; Repl. Judges have not only their reading and reasoning to inform and direct them, but likewise the practise of former Courts from the very pro­mulgation of the Law; at which [Page 110]time the sense and meaning of the same was declared by the Law­makers themselves. The Church, besides the letter of Scripture (which she reads assiduously, with watch­ing fasting, and prayer, for a right and happy understanding thereof) and her own reasoning, hath the help of a better and surer traditi­on, and the assistance of the Holy Ghost. Now I leave it to the im­partial Reader to judge, whether is more like to informe right and sure of Gods revealed tru [...]h, [...]he that hath-onely his own private reading and reasoning to help him, or she, that over and above all these, is favoured both by infallible Tradition, and the Holy Ghost: And again, whether in a matter con­cerns Salvation, it be not an act of imprudence and folly, to believe him rather than her.

CHAP. 16. Of the Roman Church.

BY the word Roman are not onely comprized the Inhabi­tants of that particular Territory of Rome, but likewise all Christi­ans in the world, that acknow­ledg [...] the Bishops of Rome for their cheif Pastour, appointed by Christ to govern his flock. My taske in this Chapter is to prove, that this company, together with the said Bishop, compose and make up the true Catholique Church.

1

1. My first proof is, that com­pany of Christians compose, and [Page 112]make up the true Catholique Church, to which the definition of the true Catholique Church doth agree; But the difinition of the true Catholique Church doth agree to the above mentioned company, therefore they compose and make up the true Catholique Church. The first Proposition is evident, every thing being really one and the same with its defini­tion; as Man with rationall, Beast with irrationall. The second Proposition I shew. The definiti­on of the true Catholique Church is, a society of men linck't toge­ther in the profession of one Faith, in the use of the same Sacraments, and under the government of Bishops, and Pastours lawfully sent, that are able to shew their personall and doctrinall successi­on from Christ and his Apostles, [Page 113]without the least interruption. A society of men. And he gave some Apostles, and some Prophets, and other some Evangelists, others Pa­stours and Doctours, to the con­smmation of the saints, unto the work of Ministery, unto the edify­ing of the body of Christ, linck't together, Eph. 4. One body, one spirit, one faith, one Baptisme, ibid: Lawfully sent. No man ta­keth the honour to himself, but he that is called, as Aaron of God. Heb. 5. How shall they preach unless they be sent. Rom. 10. That are able to shew &c. The Moun­tain of the house of our Lord shall be prepared in the top of Moun­taines, and all nations, shall flow unto it. Jsa. 2. He hath placed his Tabernacle in the sunne. Psal. 118. Their Personall and doctri­nall succession. He gave some [Page 114]Doctours and Pastours, &c. Untill wee all meet in the unity of faith. Ephes. 4. without the least inter­ruption. Behold J am with you alwaies unto the end of the world. Ma. 6.28.

2. Let us look upon this defini­tion in its severall parts and veiw, if any be discrepant from the a forenamed company. The first is, a society of men, this agreeth to the said company, for in that company is to be seen. Hierusa­lem descended from above, Apoc. 4. A goodly Hierarchy or Hea­venly order, and subordination of Subdeacon to Deacon; of Dea­con to Priest; of Priest to Bishop; of Bishop to chief Bishop or Pope, and of the Laity to all: And which is yet more admirable, these degrees are so masterlike set, that they doe not hinder and [Page 115]trouble, but as great & less strings musically tuned, make and pre­serve the Melodious Harmony of Peace and Concord. The second part is linck'd together. This agreeth to the said Company; for in that company there is no di­versity of belief; but one (as Mo­narch) swayeth, in Europe, Asia, Africa, and America, where one and the same belief is embraced for one and the same motive, Gods Revelation proposed by the Church. The third part is, law­fully sent. This agreeth to the said Company; for in that company, No man clarifieth himself, but one receiveth power from another; the Subdeacon, Deacon, & Priest from the Bishop, the Bishop from the cheif Bishop or Pope. The fourth part is Able to shew &c. This a greeth to the said Company: [Page 116]for in that company an exact suc­cession of power and doctrine is faithfully and with clearness de­duced; Writers of severall ages and Nations having put forth and published to the view of the world authentick schemes & Ca­talogues of Popes,Coccius, Gual­terius. Bishops & Pastours succeding each other from Christ and the Apostles, and from time to time layd open their Doctrine. The fifth part is, without the least in­terruption. And this agreeth with the said Company; for in that Company a Continual pure stream of power and Doctrine is demon­strated by the said writers, to have been ever sweetly gliding from its head, Christ, and in its proper Channell, Bishops and Pastours; and not any moment of time can [Page 117]be pointed at, in which its course was stopped from beating down infidelity, and imbalming true Belieuers with the fragrant odours of vertve and Religion.

2.

1. The second Proof is, that Company composeth and maketh up the true Catholick Church, which doth acknowledg and em­brace a power generally claimed, and Doctrine generally professed, by the Apostles and Christians ever since. But the said Company acknowledgeth and embraceth a power generally claymed and a Doctrine generally professed by the Apostles and Christians ever since; Therefore that composeth and maketh up the true Catholick Church. The first Proposition is [Page 118]undeniable, in asmuch as Aposto­licall power and Doctrine, (where communion is not wanting) are sure Evidences of the true Catho­lick Church.

The second Proposition I shall sufficiently clear, by instancing the beginning and after-rising of those Tenets which Sectaries hold against Catholicks, by she wing how the learned of Catholicks (who were as the mouth & pen of the rest) opposed the said Tenets, as new and never heard of before: lastly by producing Councells, witnessing and confirming, the Orthodoxness of this mouth and pen, and branding the contrary for heresies; Now forasmuch as it is easier, to evidence our Fathers acts, than our Grandfathers or great Grandfathers &c, I resolve to take this way, making my first [Page 119]instance in the last, & so upwards to the Apostles. When Calvin. 1534. changed the Hierarchie of the Church into Presbyterie, fra­med a spirituall presence of Christs body in the Eucharists, establisht a perpetuity in the Possession of Grace, destroyed all possibility of keeping the Commandments, Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, that their Commission was to inculcate that the Government of the Church was instituted by Christ Hierar­chicall, and not to be altered, that Christs presence in the Eucharist was corporall, that grace once had might be lost by sinne, that keeping of the Commandments was the way to Salvation, & there­fore as possible as salvation its self. Staphilus, Lindanus, Hosius, Clau­dius, de Xaintes. Morus, conc: [Page 120]Trident. when Zuinglius. 1525. set up a signe and figure in the place of Christs body, Christians generally professed, as the said Company doth that their Commission was to inculcate that the Body of Christ was truly and really in the Eucharist, Lindanus. Fleidan. Luth. conc. Trid. When Luther. 1517 reviled the Pope calling him Antichrist, impugned the Authority of Generall Coun­cells, Grace from the Sacraments, Mass, taught impanature, ubiqui­ty of Christs Body. Christians generally professed, as the said Company doth, that their Com­mission was to inculcate that the Pope was Christs Vicar appoin­ted to Rule his flock, That Gene­rall Councells in their Canoni­call decrees were to be obeyed, That the Sacraments did confer [Page 121]grace to all that received them worthily, that Mass was an holy sacrifice instituted by Christ, for a Commemoration of his Death and Passion, for exhibition of sove­raign honour to his Eternall fa­ther, for propitiation to the living and dead. That ubiquity was pro­per to the Godhead, Echius, Coch­laeus, Alphonsus Acastro, Fisherus, the vniversality of Collen, Louen, Paris, Henrie the 8th. Conc. Tri­dent. When Valdesius 1170 in­veighed against Indulgences and Purgatory, Christians generally professed, as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to inculcate that the Catholique Church had power to forgive, not onely the fault or guilt of sinne, but likewise the pain and punish­ment due for the same: That out of this world there was a place [Page 122]of satisfaction for such as departed in grace. Antoninus, Claudius, Cossiodus, Conc. Florent. Trident. When Photius, with other greekes 1049 opposed the Popes supre­macy, Christians generally pro­fessed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to in­culcate, That the Pope was the supream Bishop and head of the Church. Rabanus, Haym, Anto­ninus, Conc. Florent. Conc. Con­stant. 8 When Berengarius 104. grew to that impudence as to out Christ quite the Eucharist, Chri­stians generally professed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to inculcate, That Christs Body was truely and realy there, Lanfranc, Guitmundus: Blondus, Conc. Lugdunense; When Albanenses 796. questioned ex­treme unction, Christiás generally [Page 123]professed as the said Compa­ny doth, That their Commissi­on was to inculcate, that ex­treme unction was one of the sea­ven Sacraments instituted by Christ. Bede, Conc. Worm. When Jacobus, 584 took away Con­fession, Christians generally pro­fessed as the said Company doth; That their Commission was to inculcate, that Confession of sinns to a Preist rightly impowered was availeable and necessary, Saint Gregory, Cassiodorus, Conc. Tri­dent. When Sonaras 495 despised Images, Christians generally pro­fessed as the said Company doth, that their Commission was to in­culcate, that as to other things relating to God, and his saints, so also to Images a certain degree of respect and reverence was due. Saint Hier. Theodor, Conc. 2. [Page 124] Nic. When Vigilantius. 424. cried down holy Reliques and prayer to Saints, Christians gene­rally professed as the said Company doth, that their Commission was to inculcate, that respect to holy things and prayer to Saints was both laudable and beneficiall. Saint Epiphan. Saint Aug. Saint Hier. Saint Greg. Niss. Conc. Constant. Conc. Laodi. when Pe­lagius. 405 denied originall sinne, and the necessity of Baptisme, Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to incul­cate, that since the fall of Adam all were conceived in originall sinne, and that to remove it Bap­tisme was requisite. Saint August. Saint Gregory Naz. Nisse. Saint Basil, Theodoret, Saint Ambr. Saint Hier. Saint John, Conc. [Page 125]Milev. When Jovinian. 395 made sinns all alike greivous, had the same esteem of Marriage and virginity, Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, that their Commission was to inculcate, That sinns accor­ding to their more or less repug­nancy to reason, were greater some than other, that how be it Marriage was good and honoura­ble, yet that virginity was better, and to be preferred. Saint Hier. Saint August. Conc. Tolens. When Arius. 364 deprived the Dead of the livings prayers. Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to inculcate, that to pray for the dead was an act of Piety and mercy. Saint August. Saint Ambr. Saint Hier. Saint Chrys. Saint Epiphan. Conc. [Page 126]Constant. 3, Conc. Nic. 2. When Eunomius. 358. attributed to Faith strength and vertue to keep off the harm of sin from the faith­full; Christians generally pro­fessed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to in­culcate; That Christians in sinne were (notwithstanding their faith) in state of Damnation. Saint Basil. Saint Ephrem. Saint Chryso. When Novatus. 250. re­fused admission to the Penitent after Baptisme constituted a Church of meer just, Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, That their Com­mission was to inculcate that a sin­ner truly repentant was to be re­ceived at any time, and that the Church Militant was not without mixture of bad. Saint Cypr. Saint Ephrem. Saint Hier. Saint Au­gust. [Page 127]Conc. Rom. When Gnostici 129 fancied a Justice extrinsecate and imputative, Christians gene­rally professed, as the said Com­pany doth, that their Commission was to inculcate, That justice was inherent to the soul, and that it consisted of a spirituall quality called grace, whose property is to expell sinne, to enlighten the minde, to incline and enable the Will to all good. Iren. Iustin. Conc. Trident. When Simon Ma­gus. 55 destroyed freewill, opened heaven to faith unaccompanied with good workes, blasphemed God to be the Author of sinne, Christians generally professed as the said Company doth, That their Commission was to inculcate that through Adams disobedience, freewill was weakened, and ill in­clined but not lost; that faith did [Page 128]dispose and help, but without good works that shee was too weak to justify a sinfull soul, that God did all good things, and for sinne, that he did no more than suffer and permit. Saint Peter, Saint Paul, Saint Luke, Saint John, Saint Mathew, Saint James, Saint Jude, Act. Saint Dionys. Saint August. Conc. Trid.

17. This Proof will gather strength by observing, that the above named, but few dayes or Months before their opposition, held as the rest of Christians did, in all points with the said Com­pany; and that neither they, nor others in their behalf have left to posterity the least mention of any number of men in being, before their opposition, with whom to joyn and side, to make good the same. Assuredly, if any such [Page 129]thing had been, so great an ad­vantage would not have been passed over in silence.

3.

1 The third and last Proof is, That Company composeth and makethup the Catholique Church, which is acknowledged even by their Adversaries, to be Apostoli­call; But the above mentioned Company is acknowledge even by their Adversaries, to be Aposto­licall: therefore that Company composeth and maketh up the Catholique Church. The first Proposition is evident: for as much as Apostolicall in a right and genuin sense, sinignifyeth to believe as the Apostles believed, which is to be Catholique. The second Proposition appeares no [Page 130]less cleer in severall Protestan writers, who expressely account, that the Apostles first planted the Christian faith in England; That the same was retained by Bissiops and Pastours, from the first Plan­tation to Saint Austin; That in substance it differed not, from that which Saint Austin brought in; That Saint Austin was by Gregory the great, Bishop of Rome, to convert the Saxons in England to the Roman faith; That the Roman Church in Gre­gory the greats time, was the same it is at this present. See to this purpose. Perkins. Exposi. on the Creed Pag. 266. Powell Cons. pap. rer. pag. 103. Stow, How, Speed, Cambden, and all the English Chronicles. Now the Axiom in Philosophy, which assureth, Two Extreames which [Page 131]are one with a third, to be one amongst themselves, will justify this form; Saint Austins Church and Doctrine were Apostolicall; Saint Austins Church and Do­ctrine were the same with the now Roman: Therefore the Ro­man Church and Doctrine are Apostolicall.

CHAP: 17. Of certain Objections made a­gainst the Roman Church; Answered.

IT is incdent to vain-glorious and haughty men, to spurn at Au­thority, and to asperse superiours with failings: Pride sets them on, and malice contrives the means as black as their end, which is to shake off obedience, to live at plea­sure, and without controule. The Enemies of the Roman Church have not shewn more Pride in con temning her power, than malice in raising false and slanderous re­ports against her good name: As therefore in the former Chapter I [Page 133]have done my endeavour to assert her power; so will I in this, to clear her fame, and shew her innocen­cie mainly clouded, and shot at by the ensuing Objections.

Objection. 1.

1. The first Objection is, The Church of Rome teacheth Christs Body to be present in many places at once, which implyeth contra­diction. Answer, The measure of Gods power is his will, and his will is above the reach of our capa­city: Therefore no wonder if God oftentimes doth that we cannot dive into the understanding of, it sufficeth, we know the thing is done and that we do by his word; which being plain and express for the presence of Christs Body in the Sacrament, and consequently in many places at once, to doubt thereof, is no less than to question Gods veracity. As for implicancy some labour to convince this My­sterie [Page 135]of, there is none at all; for though a body cannot be locally in two places at once, by reason of locall extension, which confines it to one, yet this extension being re­moved, as it is possible to the om­nipotent power; it is as easie for a Body to be in severall places at once, as for the Deity to be in three per­sons at once, or for the soul to be in the Head, the middle, the feete at once: Neither doth Christ, calling himself a Door, a Vine, &c. Jo. 10.15. any way contradict this truth; because in these propositions, I am a Dore, a Vine, two distinct things, and of different kinds are affirmed of each other, which according to the literall and proper signification of the words, cannot be true; in that this is my Body, the same i­denticall thing is affirmed of the [Page 136]same, to wit, the body of Christ, out of the Sacrament, when the words began to be in the Sacra­ment, when they end, which with­out trope or figure is as properly true, as this is the signe of the cross, Tabitha come forth, Acts 9. Nor yet those other sayings, the Flesh profiteth nothing, my words are Spi­rit, Jo. 6. in as much as they were uttered to satisfy the Caphurnaites, who being a grosse carnall people apprehended of Christs saying, the bread which I will give is my flesh, my flesh is truely foode, unless ye eate the flesh of the Son of man, &c. Jo. 6. that he meant to give his body to be gnawn and torne in pieces, as ordinarie butchers meat, and that he was not of power to give it any other way; that appears by their murmuring, as conceiving [Page 137]horrour at the eating of humane flesh, this by question they made how can he? In satisfaction to the former apprehension, Christ said, the flesh profiteth nothing, that is, whatsoever flesh given or received as ordinary flesh, availeth not the soule; in satisfaction to the latter Christ said, my words are spirit, that is, are able to effect what they signifie or express, that this is the meaning of both Christs answers, I shew, because the flesh profiteth no­thing, literally taken is a false pro­position, Christs, flesh being no less profitable for mans redemption, than ordinary flesh for his corporall nourishment, and my words are Spirit, understood otherwise would not have been to the Capharnaites question, which, as I, said before, was of his power. Now this meaning [Page 138]is to farre from overthrowing the mysterie of the realpresence, that it clearly confirmes and establisheth the same, for although the man­ner of Christ giving his bodie be Spirituall, yet is it not incon­sistent with the reality of his pre­sence, he was really present to the water of Bethsaida Ma [...]k. 6. Notwithstanding the manner of his walking was altogether mira­culous and Spirituall. Saint Paul. 1. Cor. 11. knew this consistent­cie, when after instruction of a spi­rituall and worthy receiving, he scrupuled not to pronounce con­demnation upon the unworthy receiver, not of bread and wine, but the very bodie of our Lord. Had Saint Paul meant of figura­tive or spiritual presence, he would have said for not discerning the [Page 139]figure of the body of our Lord, and not the body of our Lord. Besides figurative, or spirituall presence are ordinary effects, and within the compass of mans power, there­fore required not any such extra­ordinary munificency, as Christ used of his.

3. If it be true as Philosophy teacheth, that a consequence from being, to may bee, is valid and good, Experience demonstrates, that God hath power to make Christs Body really present in se­verall places at once; for as much as the self same time, he was so­present with his father in heaven, he appeared and discoursed with Saint Paul on Earth saying, Saul, Saul, why dost thou perse­cute mee? Acts. 9. For when Saint Paul replyed, who art thou [Page 140]Lord? Hee answered, I am Jesus whom thou dost persecute. Even in nature there is a Resemblance and light of this Mystery: one and the same water is in the Fountain, River and Lake at once, one and the same voyce in Thousands of Eares at once; one and the same face in sundry looking glasses at once; should we believe onely that which we understand, there would not be any beleif in us of Mysteries of faith; they being all above the reach of humane Ca­pacity.

4. It will be opposed, Although God by his omnipotent Power, can make the Body of Christ pre­sent, in many places at once, yet his pleasure is not to do it, by rea­son of the strange irreverences, and absurdities which would ensue [Page 141]thereof, as to be subject to the eating and tearing in peices of Doggs, Catts, Mice, and to the abuse of wicked men and Miscre­ants. Reply. He that is of power to render a Body really present in severall places at once, without doubt is able to defend, and keep the same from all outrages; as God is pleased to do in this Myste­rie, by removing locall extension, and by consequence possibility, by meanes whereof, Doggs, Catts, and Mice, can onely tear and de­stroy the accidents of Bread and wine: wicked men and Miscre­ants offer violence to the same, but not hurt or annoy the Body of Christ; no more than he were of force to wrong the Godhead, that surprized with a raging fit, should strike at the ayre, with an [Page 142]intention to do him mischeif. But admit these pretended incon­veniences should follow, I do not conceive there could be inferred any other than a continuation of that ardent love of Christ, which he shewed to man, when he estranged himself from his eternall father, to bear with patience and mildness, hunger, cold, whip­pings, spittings, thorns; and last of all the bitter and disgracefull Death of the Cross.

Objection. 2.

The second objection is: the Roman Church believes Transub­stantiation, 2 doctrine unheard of till the Councell of Lateran. Answer the name Transubstan­tiation was indeed imposed by the Councell of Lateran called the Great, as the name Consubstanti­all by the first Councell of Nice, and the name Trinity by the Church, but as the things sig­nified by the names Consubstan­tiall and Trinity were generally believed before the impositions of those names, so the thing signified by the name Transubstantiation was generally believed before this name was thought of, witness Saint Cyrill, Jeruso. Catechesi [Page 144]mystag. 4. saying of Christ he tur­ned water into wine in Cana of Ga­lile & shall we not believe him that he hath turned wine into his bloud? Saint Ambrose sayes to the same effect, L. 4. de sacram. C. 4. before the words of consecra­tion it is bread, after consecration, of bread is made the flesh of Christ &c. If the words of our Lord Jesus be so powerfull to give being to that was not, how much more are they able to turn one thing in­to another? The very words of consecration, this is my body con­firm no less, in as much as being an operative proposition, suppo­seth not, as a speculative proposi­tion doth, but maketh the thing it fignifies, which implyeth a reall change either of Christs body into bread, or of bread into Christs [Page 145]body; for how can bread remain­ing bread be Christs body? Or Christs body continuing the same be bread? Surely no more than water, while it is water, can be wine, or a stone, so long as it is a stone, can be a tree. Now that the change is not of Christs body into bread is evident, because then Christ should have said this is bread, but saying this is my body, demonstrates clearly that the change is of bread into Christs bo­dy, which is fitly named Transub­stantiation, as declaring the nature of the mystery believed. It will be opposed that Transubstantia­tion is, against experience, which shewes that consecrated bread and wine nourish. Repl. if any such triall hath been made, un­doubtedly the nourishment was [Page 146]supernaturall, God supplying [...] his extraordinary power the war of the severall substances of brea [...] and wine to the end to save faith which according to Saint Pa [...] Hebr. 11. is of things not appea­ring. It will be opposed that after consecration still remain the acci­dents of bread and wine, who [...] essence consists in inhering in sub­stance. Repl. As it is true tha [...] after consecration the accidents o [...] bread and wine continue th [...] same, so its false that their essence consists in inherence; for the defi­nition of accident is apt to inhere, which may be without inherence by meanes of Gods Omnipotency, whereto their is a necessity to have recourse in all matters of faith, nature being in those mat­ters at a loss and useless, as Saint [Page 147]Hilar. Lib. 8 de Trinitate well observeth; his words are, In Gods matters wee are not to speak after the ordinary manner of men.

Objection. 3.

1. The third objection is; Th [...] Roman Church committeth Ido [...] latry in her adoration at Mas [...] bowing to the name of Iesus Altars, Images, and Reliques Answer. By the Commandment Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven thing, nor adore it, Exod 20. is neither forbid the art of En­graving, Carving, Printing, Paint­ing, Casting, Sowing, Embroyder­ing; nor yet all manner of Religi­ous honor to be given to Creatures: For in the old Tastament (where this Commandement is enjoyned) the use of those severall acts was held lawfull, and Religious ho­nour exhibited to the fiery Bush by Moyses, Exod. 25. to the [Page 149]Oracle by the High Preists, 3. Kings. 27. and to the Arke by David, Exod. 3. Levit. 26. Psal. 131. And God himself justified them therein, by striking Vzziah with Leprosie, and Oza. with death, for not forbearing to med­dle, with holy and sacred things without authority. 2. Paral. 26. Kings. 6 so that all this Comman­dement forbids, is to make graven things, to the end to honour them with divine honour, that is, to make Gods of them, as the Pa­gans did.

2. Now to vindicate the Roman Church from all Idolatry in her worship, it is to be noted, That all things are not of equall worth, but that some things surpassing other some in perfection and ex­cellency, are more worthy than [Page 150]other; whence it is, that God is superiour to all things, Angells to men, and men some to others. And hereupon is grounded honour and the degrees thereof, accor­ding to the variety of perfections and excellencies found in things: for where perfection and excel­lency are discovered to be, there the very light of nature teacheth honour to be due more or less, as the degrees of excellency and per­fection are observed to bee higher or lower. Now honour (as pro­per to man) is an outward respect given to a thing, with an inward act of acknowledgment of some perfection and excellency in the same. So as to the compleating of honour (as to us) two actions are required; an exteriour of the body, and an interiour of the [Page 151]mind; when either is wanting, honour becomes lame and manke. A timorous man apprehending danger in exhibiting outward respect where it is due, maketh onely an inward acknowledg­ment, this comes short of honour. A man distracted or mad, and so uncapable of the inward acknow­ledgment, by reason of his distem­pered sences and faculties, giveth an outward respect; this is as far from honour as the other.

3. Both actions (viz.) both the inward and outward may be ex­pressed to God, and creatures; as it is lawfull to bow or kneel to God, so to creatures, as we may see, Jos. 5. Gen. 23.33. Exod. 3.1. Kings. 2.1. Paral. 29. Jud. 10.13. Ester. 8. Num. 2. Now to discerne, when these actions [Page 152]come within compass of divine religious, and Civil honour, de­pends wholly on a right, and well differencing of the perfections and excellencies of the things ho­noured. To bow or kneel to a thing with an inward acknow­ledgment, that its perfections and excellencies are absolute, unpar­ticipated, and infinitely excee­ding all other, is divine honour; to bow or to kneel to a thing with an inward acknowledgment, that its perfections and excellen­cies are onely participated, and relative to God, Christ, or some glorious soul, is religious honour; to bow or kneel to a thing with an inward acknowledgment, that its perfections, and excellencies relate to some wordly dignity or preheminence, is Civil honour. [Page 153]Divine honour is proper to God, and unattributable to any crea­ture under Idolatry; Neither doth the Church of Rome afford this honour but to God alone; her adoration at Mass being not meant, nor directed to the acci­dents of Bread and Wine, nor to the figures of Host and Chalice next to sight (for in these she doth not acknowledge to be the perfections and Excellencies be­longing to God) but to the person of Christ hid and covered under the said accidents and figures. She alloweth indeed of religious honour to the name of Iesus, to Altars, Pictures, Reliques, rela­ting to God, Christ, and his Saintes; as she doth of Civil, to things in relation to temporall dignities and preheminencies: [Page 154]But to find fault with this, were to blame justice, for giving to every thing its due, in acknow­ledging the truth; it being most true and undoubted, that the name of Jesus, Altars, Pictures and Reqliques, bear relation to God, Christ, and his Saintes, as persons in dignities, and prehemi­nencies to the same.

4. To urge against the Lawfull­ness of adoration at Mass, from the interposition of Creatures, would prove too much, viz. That Christ, were not adorable in Churches, in the fieldes, nay at all, by reason of a necessity of inter­position of walls, the Heavens, or Christs Body betwixt the Ado­rers, and his sacred person.

5. It will be opposed, Christ is not capable of adoration in the [Page 155]Sacrament, he not appearing there like himself with glory and Majesty. Repl. Christ is adora­ble where, and howsoever he is pleased to be; else the three Kings, Saint Mary Magdalen, and the Apostles were reprovea­ble for doing him homage, not in a sumptuous Palace, and enthro­ned under a rich cloth of State, but in a poor stable, a dusty man­ger, having for Canopy, a rack of hay, not gloriously attired, and accompanied with Nobles, but in swadling Cloathes betwixt an Ox, and an Ass, not like a Prince, but a Mechanicke, a Gardener, a Carpenter. The poorness and meanness of the manner Christ ap­peares in, not onely doth not de­prive him of the duty of adorati­on, but renders him much more [Page 156]adorable; for exaltation is humi­lities reward, and so it is but meet, they go hand in hand, and take increase together, that the height of that, may answer the depth of this. For which respect Saint Paul sticked not to bid ho­nour to be given to the very name of Jesus, Phil. 2.

Objection. 4.

1. The fourth objection is. The Roman Church challengeth pow­er to forgive sinns which belong­eth onely to God. Ans. All Power is naturally & originally in God, as Lord Paramount of all Crea­tures; but not incommunicable: for as he hath bestowed the Pow­er of governing kingdomes and Common-wealths on Kings and Magistrates. Prov. 8.15. Rom. 13.1. so the Power of remitting of sinns on the Apostles and their successours: yet men, having these powers by way of gift and parti­cipation, may not be said to go­vern, or to forgive sinns, but as Gods substitutes and Delegates, suitably to the Condition of their inferiority and subjection.

Objection. 5.

1. The fift objection is. The Roman Church derogateth from Christes Mediatorship, making it common to Saints and Angells. Answer. Things that are like have sometimes the same denomi­nation; so kings and Judges are called Gods, for some resemblance betwixt Gods power and theirs. Psal. 81.1, 6. The Roman Church then observing in the in­tercession of Saints and Angells, a certain likeness to the Mediati­on of Christ, they being both ex­pressions of Charitable and good desires for others, may not unfitly call them alike by the name of Mediation. But she is so farre hereby from intending the least [Page 159]prejudice to Christs Mediation, either in confounding or equall­ing the same with that of Saints and Angells, that she puts as wide a difference betwixt them, as can be betwixt two things of different appellations; acknowledging in Christs Mediation a worth or right, whereto the thing desired is of Justice due; in the mediations of Saints and Angells, onely a ver­tue of moving Gods goodness and mercy to grant their desires; which being not held in jurious to Christs Mediation to allow of, as good in the prayers of sinners, hated and abominated by God for their Crimes and iniquities, much less ought it to be esteemed a wrong to attribute it to the in­tercession, and prayers of Saints and Angells, whose purity and [Page 160]sanctity, render them gracious and pleasing in the sight of God.

2. It will be opposed, in the vast distance as is betwxt heaven and earth, Saints and Angells cannot hear. Repl. blessed Soules in their state of separation have, as Angells, (Luke. 15.) an hear­ing, quite other from that of soules immersed and plunged in flesh and blood: these hear by meanes of corporall organs, which limi­ted within a certain distance, can­not receive impression out of the same; Those; hear with their un­derstandings, which are by so much the more open, and quick of apprehension, by how much the less their dependence is on matter. The Saints then being freed of Corporall Cloggs, may hear at any distance.

3. It will be opposed, Be it, Saints can hear at what distance soever; yet this is not possible, un­less objects be proposed: and what capacity in prayers sent so­far off, as to reach to Heaven? Repl. Catholiques boast not of any such vertue in their prayers; but they beleive (as is confessed by all) that God is every where, in Heaven, on Earth, and all the way betwixt both: and that he is the cheif and principall cause of all effects, and so of mans prayers. Now it being proper for every cause to relate to its effects, and so to represent the same, as look­ing glasses do faces, and other opposed objects; the Saints (whose happiness consists in a clear vision of God) must needes see and behold (amongst other [Page 162]effects of his goodness and mercy) the Petitions of those, who become humble suitors to them.

4. It will be opposed, If Saints and Angells hear not mens pray­ers before God proposeth them, he knoweth them beforehand; whence may be inferred, that their intercession is needless. Answer. Gods foresight of mens prayers, makes not the intercession of Saints and Angells any way un­profitable or fruitless; inasmuch as the effect intended thereby is not to better Gods understanding, but to obtain from his blessed will, mercy and compassion: For which the intercession of Saints and Angells is powerfull; as well because it is an act of fervent Charity (the practise whereof is most pleasing and acceptable to [Page 163]God) as also, because Saints and Angells are Gods freinds and fa­vourites. Princes have often no­tice of subjects imprisonments and condemnations, yet seldome give reprieves or enlargements, but at the entreaty of some freind or favourite. Men are warranted, yea wished to pray for one ano­ther 1. Tim. 2. notwithstanding God hath the foresight of their wants and necessities, Davids adultery and guilt of blood were in the sight of God unpardoned, till after a low humiliation, and an hearty acknowledgment of his fault. 1. King. 12.

Objection. 6.

1. The sixth Objection is, the Roman Church entertaineth di­vision, and Contrariety in Religi­on; the Dominicans maintaining a Phisicall predetermination; The Jesuits a morall; Those, that the Virgin Mary was conceived in originall sinne; these, that she was prevented by Grace, concei­ved in the same. And if this be not enough to inferre contrariety in Religion, severall Councells have contradicted each other. Answer. Not every difference but a difference in pointes of faith, makes division and contrariety in Religion: the Dominicans and Jesuits onely quarell about opini­ons; it being no matter of beleif, [Page 165]that Gods predetermination is Phisicall or Morall, or that the blessed Virgin was conceived in originall sinne, or in grace. These are meer Schoole nicities, and not at all destructive to that unity, which Catholiques so much Re­verence in Religion. It is as un­true, that generall and approved Councells have contradicted one another in matters of Faith, or Occumenicall decrees: They have indeed talked and discoursed con­trary, yea, latter Councells have altered and changed Laws and constitutions of government made and established by former. But this onely proves that Councells admit a liberty, and freedome to debate matters of Religion, and that what was once good and convenient, may prove afterwards [Page 166](Circumstances varying) bad and inconvenient, which no wayes prejudices beleif. And this is it, and all St Austïn hints, where he sayes, the precedent generall Coun­cells are mended by the following. lib. 2. Cont. Donatist. Cap. 9.

Objection. 7.

1. The seventh objection is, the Roman Church is injurious to Christs merits, approving of hu­mane merits. Answer. Reason and experience shew a diversity of Agents; That as some are necessi­tated as beasts, other some are fee as men, and therefore capable of merit and demerit, whereby they are differenced from beasts, which are uncapable of either. The Assertion then of humane merits, is no other wrong to Christ, than the affirming of a plain and clear truth can be wrong to him.

2. It will be opposed, men are capable of merit and demerit in order to temporall; but not to eternall reward. Repl. As God [Page 168]hath enabled men to deserve tem­porall, so eternall Rewards, as is apparent in Scripture; terming Heaven, a Crown of Justice a Re­ward, a Goale, 2. Tim. 4. Math. 5.1. Corint. 9. which necessari­ly suppose merits as their correla­tives, bare actions void of desert, being look'd on, onely as by way of gift. It were indeed no less than Blasphemy, to go about to equall in worth other merits with Christs; but the Roman Church offereth not any such thing, whilest she beleiveth Christs me­rits to be of infinite value, others onely of finite; Christs merits to have their desert, and worth from no other; others to hold depen­dance for both of them: Rather the Roman Church by asserting other merits, and withall ac­knowledging [Page 169]their desert and worth to flow from Christs me­rits, attributeth more to Christs merits than they do, who deny other merits. For hereby are yeilded to Christs actions a capa­city of meriting themselves, and a communicability of the same to other actions, which are two per­fections: and to acknowledg two perfections in a thing is undoub­tedly to give more to that thing, than to acknowledg onely one.

3. It will be opposed, All acti­ons besides Christs, are dutyes; and dutyes are inconsistent with merit. Repl. They are so without Covenant and acceptance; so is obedience in a Childe, a servant, a subject, due to his father, his master, his Prince: Nevertheless as a father, a master, a Prince ma­king [Page 170]a Compact to gratify some particular act of his Childe, his servant, his subject, innables the same, and entitles it to what was promised; even so by the meanes of Gods Covenant (1. Tim. 4. Rom. 2.6. Heb. 6.) that he will reward certain actions of men (though otherwise due) and ac­cept the same as worthy, they become meritorious, and a reward due: upon this accompt Saint Paul deemed it no presumption to challenge at the hands of God, a Crown of Justice for his good fighting, well running and con­stant keeping of Faith. 2. Tim. 4.

Objection. 8.

1. The eighth and last objection is, The Roman Church giveth the Communion under one kind, contrary to Christs institution. Answer. There is a great deal of difference betwixt Christs institu­tions and his commandements; These requiring both beleife and observance, those onely beleife: For although Christs actions be good examples for us to imitate, yet, as such, they impose not obli­gation upon imitation. Christ fasted forty dayes, and as many nights, went into the Desart to be tempted, forbare Mariage, &c. are all bound to do the like? none will say it: The common practise of all religions to the contrary cries [Page 172]no; wherefore the Roman Church beleiving Christs institution of the Sacrament to have been under both kindes, giveth to it its full due. for the Communion under one, there being no Commandement forbidding the same; it is rashness in a high de­gree, and want of charity to con­demne her as Sacriligious for so doing.

2 These words indeed, do this in Commemoration of me, Drink ye all of this, imply a Comman­dement; but concerning onely Preistes, to whom as the power of making, so the obligation of taking under both kinds, is pecu­liar and proper; those other Un­less ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man, and drink his blood, import a Commandement too, and that [Page 173]extending to the Laity; but fall­ing upon the things, that is to say, upon the body and blood of Christ, and not upon the kindes, leaves them indifferent and free. The reason of both is, because by this Commandement, Christs maine drift is (as the words plainely intimate) to inforce a Spirituall food; which being Christ, Body and Blood, and since his Resurrection grown insepara­ble, may indifferently be taken under one or both kindes: where­as by that (as the words like­wise clearly beare) he cheifely aymes at a Remembrance of his death and Passion; which inclu­ding a separation of his Soule from his Body, and his Blood from his flesh cannot be so live­ly and fully represented under [Page 174]one kind. For Confirmation, looke up into the Primitive times, even of the Apostles and Christ. Acts. 2.42, 46. and you will find by their promiscuous Com­munion, sometimes under one kind, sometimes under another, and sometimes under both, that they never understood of any Commandement of Communi­cating under both kinds.

And thus have you layed be­fore you the will of God, to which all that believe a God, ac­knowledge a conformity to be due. Now although I am satisfied by what hath been said, that one­ly Roman Catholiques have this Conformity, yet I may not assure my selfe that others will be so; knowing full well, that the deep­est reasoning is but beating the [Page 175]ayre without Gods grace, there­fore it concerns all to crave it. The way to obtain it is to love one another, and the way to this, is to keep newtrality in our Wills, for if our wills be once admitted to side with our Iudgments; Anger, Hatred, and other passions will crowd in, and they being sworn disturbers of peace, will undoubt­edly break Unity, which is the bond and tie of love. If our Judg­ments will needes jarre and quarrell, let them fight it out a­mong themselves, having worried each other they will at lengh be glad to give over and rest; by meanes whereof, we shall be in a faire likelyhood of becoming one sheep-fold: And then Christ will own us all as our Common Pastour, and guide to Eternity, Amen.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.