VIII QVERIES Upon the late Declarations of, and letters from, the ARMY: Proposed to all true Lovers of their Country and Parliaments, And conscientious Souldiers in the ARMY.
Beloved beleeve not every spirit, &c.
London, Printed in the Yeare 1647.
Eight Queres upon the late Declarations of, and Letters from the Army; proposed to all true lovers of their Country and Parliaments, and conscientious Souldiers in the Army.
1 VVHether an whole well-minded and well-meaning Army, may not by specious pretences be abused to carry on the ambitious and pernitious designes of some persons they most confide in, as wel as others; and be drawn on by degrees to act and demand that at last, which their judgements and consciences at first abhorred, as well as Hazael, 2 Kings 8. 12, 13? And whether all who have religious and specious pretences in their mouths, have the like reall intentions in their hearts and reins, which the Anabaptists proceedings in Germany disprove, who had as holy and just pretences, as any now inclining to their way and opinions?
2. Whether an Army, formerly dutifull and meritorious, yet now so far distempered, as to rule (if not over-rule) their own Generall and Officers; to seize and remove the Kings own person, (with the Commissioners of both houses appointed to attend him) from the place designed for his residence by the Parliaments of both Kingdomes (upon meer ground-less and proof-less surmises, [Page 4] never revealed to any in Authority) without the Parliaments privity, in high affront of their priviledges and power; endeavouring to over-awe, if not to force the Parliament which raised them, by marching up against them; labouring to dis-ingage the People, City, and Kingdome, from; and engage them against it, contrary to their solemn Covenant; refusing to disband for the Kingdomes ease and peace; and acting for the present by their own meer power and will; can be a probable and fitting instrument of redressing those Arbitrary and injurious proceedings in the Houses, Committees, and others, of which they now complaine? And whether their refusal to dis-band, or to remove farther off from London, or obey the Parliaments present just Commands (upon what ever specious printed pretexts) be not a very sad publike president, likely to conjure up a spirit of Universall Disobedience to Parliaments, Magistrates, and superiours of all sorts throughout the Kingdome, to its utter ruine, if not timously prevented, dis-liked, opposed by all well-wishers to the weal and tranquility of Church and State?
3. Whether 31. H. 6. 1. 1 Jack Cades and his confederates traiterous forcing of the Parliament in former times, upon popular pretences; Henry Jermins, Percies and Gorings Treason, in practising to bring up the Northern Army towards London, to over-awe and force the Parliament soon after its commencement; and the Kings comming to the Commons House with an armed Traine of Cavaliers, to demand the five Members, Jan. 4. 1641. (An Exact collection, &c. p. 35. &c. Voted to be a Treasonable Act, and high breach of the Rights and Priviledges of Parliament, and so resented by the whole Kingdome, though varnished over with most specious pretences, and the publike good) will not be all justified, if not exceeded by the Armies seising and removing of the Kings person, refusall to disband, and marching up to London, to over-awe the Parliament demand Members, and dis-ingage the City and people from them? And how their Offences can be differenced or justified, where their proceedings and pretences are the same?
4. Whether the Armies present disbanding now they have proposed their grievances and demands to the Houses, in a dutifull and peaceable manner upon receit of their Arrears, without marching nearer London, to ease the Kingdome of new taxes and [Page 5] Free quarter, to expedite the reliefe of Ireland (interrupted by their mutinie) and prevent new civill broyles, be not a more consciencious, just, probable, safe, and honorable way to obtain all their just demands on their own and the Kingdomes behalfe, from both Houses, then their refusall to disband, or marching up to London? Which as it will savour of high disobedience, violence, and breach of priviledge at the least, if not of some dangerous design of higher nature; so it will certainly endanger the adjournment or dissolution of the Houses, the pillaging of the City, the imbroyling of the Kingdome in a new War; blemish the Armies former reputation, and fidelity, encourage Malignants, grieve the well-affected, and procure more mischiefes then it can redress; and bring* just damnation on the contrivers of it; who in point of conscience ought not to do evill that good may come of it. And therefore the justification of their proceedings and not disbanding from the Scots (whose proceedings here though more dutiful and respectful to the Parliament then theirs, were yet much declaimed against by them and their party) and Netherlands, who raised Forces, as the Parliament did now, onely in case of absolute necessity for their own and Kingdomes necessary preservation against their oppressing Princes, when there was no other remedy; is no wayes suitable to their or our condition, in relation to the Parliament; who need no Armies, nor externall violence (especially from their own friends) to enforce them to do justice and redresse all publike grievances, which they have solemnly covenanted to performe and will accordingly execute, though you disband?
5. What assurance, can the Parliament, City, or Kingdome receive from a discontented Army, holding their guns and Weapons in their hands, if not ballanced by an equall armed force for their defence, if all their present demands, that are just & reasonable, be granted; they wil not afterwards proceed to demand that which is neither honorable, just, nor reasonable for the Parliament to grant, and yet dangerous to deny, for feare of violence and new tumults, since their demands do dayly multiply; & some of their Heterodox Chaplains, Officers, and Souldiers in Anti-Magistratical Principles, Writings, Speeches, ingender a just fear, of such subsequent demands, of whose justice or reasonableness themselves will be [Page 6] the Iudges, not the Parliament? And how they shall be ascertained that when they have demanded and removed some Members (opposite to them and their proceedings, perchance onely out of grounds of conscience, which they grant must not be forced, especially in Parliaments, where there should be most freedome both of speech and Votes) that they will not demand and remove all others who are not of their party or confederacy, and recruite the House with new members of their own, and thereby gaine a power (which some fear is their reall design) to change the Laws and Government of Church and State, and dispose of all Offices and places to their own Creatures, as they have done for the most part in the Army? To avoyd which justly feared mischief they have cause both in conscience and honour to disband upon the Parliaments command which raised them. The rather, because their refusing to disband till such Members and others whom they intend to impeach as incendiaries and enemies to the Army, be tried, wil be contradictory to their own principles and desires, of free and impartial Publick Justice; which cannot be reputed free or unbiassed, when the Parliament and Judges shal be awed and terrified with an whole Army of Accusers and prosecutors; by whose over-awing power, Terror, Menaces (the highest Champarty and Maintenance that can be) justice will probably if not certainly be perverted, the Iudges, witnesses, and parties terrified, meer innocents condemned; and Members of the Armies party (though perhaps justly impeached of higher crimes and misdemeaners then any of their opposites) escape either un-impeached or un-censured, contrary to their present pretences.
6. Whether the Armyes complaint of undue elections if impartially examined by impartial Judges, wil not light heaviest on their own friends and members the greatest sti [...]lers in, and the occasions of them? Whether their general exceptions against elections in Cornwal and Wales, proceeded not from their Chaplain Mr. Peters (who hath gained more by the wars then any two Presbyterian Ministers) whose sickness hindred his presence at them, to bring in Members of his own party? And whether the Officers and Souldiers of the Army themselves, have not in some places, deprived the people of their freedom in elections, to bring [Page 7] in themselves, to strengthen their party in the House? And if so (as may be proved) they have most cause to complain against themselves; there being no complaint or Petitions that we hear of against the unjustness of any Elections in Cornwal, or Wales, though many against the Elections of divers of their party in other parts; and they must disband their Army, that so all future elections may be free as they desire.
7. Whether the Independent party and some of the Armies friends, have not been more arbitrary, exorbitant, and irregular in their Votes and proceedings in the Houses, Committees, and severall Imployments; disposed of and fingered more of the Kingdoms Treasure; carryed and disposed of more Offices and gainful places, received greater rewards, Salaries, and far more and better pay for the most part, and pursued their own ends and interests more then any others they asperse? And whether their private listing of many thousands to recruite the Army since the warrs ended without the Publick knowledg of the Houses, to increase the Kingdoms charge, gives not the Parliament and others just occasion, (in regard of the Armies present and late actions) to suspect the carrying on of some desperate and destructive designs in England, rather then any hints or jealousies or other private listings of men without authority of Parliament, (suggested but not proved in the fourth page of the late Declaration.) And whether such new Recruites can with equal justice take and Challenge Arreares, as wel as those gallant Souldiers imployed in action all the Wars; or any of the Army challenge pay from the time they were voted to disband, for continuing together against the Houses Order, and marching up against their Priviledges, which they were raised to defend?
8. Whether the Armies late proceedings, if not qualified by their speedy disbanding and future Obedience to the Parliament; wil not eclipse and nullifie all their former merits, glory and esteem, in the eyes of all the world; draw perpetual scandal on the Profession of Religion, amaze all their friends abroad and at home, endanger the loss of dying Ireland; rejoyce the hearts, elevate the hopes and accomplish the designs of our Malignant Prelatical and Romish Enemies; bring perpetual shame, if not utter ruine to our Nation; and in conclusion to the chief Contivers [Page 8] and Fomenters of them? If so, We confidently hope, that all Consciencious Officers and Souldiers in the Army, upon second thoughts, and serious perusal of these Queries, wil give over their intended designs and distand, as many of them have done; and if any obstinately persevere to force the Parliament & infringe their Priviledges, or disburb the Publick peace; that the whole Kingdom, City, and Country, according to their solemn Covenant, wil Unanitnously withstand them, and chastise their dangerous disobedience to the Highest Powers; which many fear they project to over-awe and subvert.