Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis nono [undecimo] die mensis Julii anno Dom. 1681

Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis nono [undecimo] die mensis Julii anno Dom. 1681

Table of contents

IN VESPERIIS:

Quaestiones Inceptoris ALEXANDRI PUDSEY è Coll. Magd.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HENRICI FAIRFAX è Coll. Magd.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GEORGII REYNELL è C. C. C.

Quaestiones Inceptoris JOHANNIS YOUNGER è Coll. Magd.

Quaestiones Inceptoris JOHANNIS SMITH è Coll. Magd.

Quaestiones Inceptoris EDVARDI FOWLER è C. C. C.

Quaestiones Inceptoris FRANCISCI CARSWELL è Coll. Exon.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ANTONII RADCLIFFE ex AEde Christi.

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA Discutiendae in VESPERIIS. Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE ROSE, è Coll. Exon.

Quaestiones in Philosophia Discutiendae in Vesperiis.

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA Discutiendae OXONII in COMITIIS,

§

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae in Comitiis.

Quaestiones in Medicinâ discutiendae in Comitiis.

Quaestiones in Philosophiâ discutiendae in Comitiis.

§

[Page] QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCUTIENDAE OXONII

IN VESPERIIS:

Nono Die Mensis Julii Anno Dom. 1681.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ALEXANDRI PUDSEY è Coll. Magd.

An

Deum per Imaginem colere liceat? Neg.

Articuli aliqui Religionis sint admittendi, quos non capit ratio? Aff.

Adoratio ad Nomen Jesu sit licita? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HENRICI FAIRFAX è Coll. Magd.

An

Pontifex Romanus in decidendis Religionis Controversiis errare possit? Aff.

Ministri Verbi Divini possint debeantque esse disparis Authoritatis & Dignitatis? Aff.

Vocatio externa requiratur ad obeundum Sacrum in Ecclesia Ministerium? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GEORGII REYNELL è C. C. C.

An

Quilibet Christianus in rebus fidei teneatur absolute submittere suum Judicium sententiae Judicum Ecclesiasticorum? Neg.

Ut Ecclesiam Romanam à primaeva fide defecisse probemus, necesse sit Authorem, Locum, & Tempus istius defectionis assignare? Neg.

Ecclesia Anglicana Jure Superstitionis accusetur? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris JOHANNIS YOUNGER è Coll. Magd.

An

S. Scriptura sit perfecta Regula fidei? Aff.

Leges de adiaphoris latae obligent Conscientiam? Aff.

Liceat Subditis contra legitimum suum Magistratum, sub quovis praetextu Religionis, arma movere? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris JOHANNIS SMITH è Coll. Magd.

An

Fides Christiana vi & armis sit propaganda? Neg.

Poenitentia sit Sacramentum proprie sic dictum? Neg.

Conjugium Sacerdotibus sit interdictum? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris EDVARDI FOWLER è C. C. C.

An

Sacrificium Christi sit expiatorium? Aff.

Cultus Pontificius in Sacrificio Missae sit Idololatricus? Aff.

Leges Ecclesiasticae de rebus adiaphoris in cultu Divino usurpandis repugnent Libertati Christianae? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris FRANCISCI CARSWELL è Coll. Exon.

An

Bona Opera sint salutis aeternae meritoria? Neg.

Christus pro peccatis omnium Credentium plene & integre satisfecerit? Aff.

Extra Ecclesiam salus unicuique in sua Religione sit expectanda? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ANTONII RADCLIFFE ex AEde Christi.

An

Christus sit Legislator? Aff.

Poenae damnatorum sint aeternae? Aff.

Infantes Baptismi sint capaces? Aff.

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA Discutiendae in VESPERIIS.
Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE ROSE, è Coll. Exon.

An

Morbi possint excitari à Veneficiis? Neg.

Bilis secretio fiat in Hepate per Acinos Glandulosos? Aff.

Sydera valeant aliquid in Morbis curandis? Neg.

Quaestiones in Philosophia Discutiendae in Vesperiis.

An

Coelum agat in humanam voluntatem? Neg.

Phantasia producat reales effectus? Aff.

Mores animi sequantur temperamentum Corporis? Neg.

Resp. JOHANNE SCOT Incept. jun. è Coll. Reg.

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA Discutiendae OXONII in COMITIIS,

Undecimo die Julii, Anno Dom. 1681.

§

An

Ecclesia Romana sit Idololatrica? Aff.

Rex habeat summam potestatem circa res Ecclesiasticas & Civiles? Aff.

Magistratus politicus res Deo concessas & rite dicatas possit de jure alienare? Neg.

Resp. THO. CROSTHWAIT S. T. B. è Col. Regin.

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae in Comitiis.

An

Dicendi data libertate, Libellorum famosorum Licentia concessa sit. Neg.

Intentio delinquendi, effectu non securo, sit punienda? Aff.

Poenam Legibus impositam Judex possit minuere? Neg.

Resp. RI: TRAFFLES. LL. Bac. è Coll. Novo.

Quaestiones in Medicinâ discutiendae in Comitiis.

An

Respiratio sit motus mixtus? Aff.

Detur fermentum Renale? Aff.

Dentur Medicamenta specifica? Neg.

Resp. THO. ROSE Inceptore. è Coll. Exon.

Quaestiones in Philosophiâ discutiendae in Comitiis.

An

Sedes animae sit in Cerebro? Aff.

Mores animi ex sermone dignoscantur? Aff.

Fontes oriantur à Mari? Aff.

Resp. JOS. HARWAR, A. M. è Coll. Magd.

§

§

OXONII, Ex Officina LEONARDI [...]

Information about this book

Title statement

Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis nono [undecimo] die mensis Julii anno Dom. 1681

University of Oxford.

Edition statement

1681

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A90332

ID [STC]

Wing O956

ID [STC]

ESTC R42825

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

38875808

ID [OCLC]

ocm 38875808

ID [VID]

152319

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A90332)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 152319)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2292:19)

Source

— Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis nono [undecimo] die mensis Julii anno Dom. 1681, University of Oxford..

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.).

Ex officina Leonardi [Lichfield, Academiæ Typographi,. Oxonii :: anno Dom. 1681].. (Printed in two columns.) (Imperfect: torn, with loss of part of imprint. Lost text conjectured from other issues.) (Reproduction of original in: Bodleian Library.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.