Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis duodecimo [decimo quarto] die mensis Julii anno Domini 1673

Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis duodecimo [decimo quarto] die mensis Julii anno Domini 1673

Table of contents

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCUTIENDAE OXONII IN ƲESPERIIS, Duodecimo Die Mensis Julii, Anno Dom. 1673.

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae Oxonii in Ʋesperiis.

QVAESTIONES in Medicina discutiendae Oxonii in Vesperiis.

Quaestiones in Philosophiâ discutiendae Oxonii in Ʋesperiis.

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA discutiendae Oxonii in COMITIIS, Decimo quarto die Julii Ann. Dom. 1673.

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae in Comitiis.

Quaestiones in Medicina discutiendae in Comitiis.

Quaestiones in Philosophia discutiendae in Comitiis.

§

[Page]

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCUTIENDAE OXONII IN ƲESPERIIS, Duodecimo Die Mensis Julii, Anno Dom. 1673.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE TOMKINS è Coll. Om. Animarum.

An Potestas Clavium sit à Christo data Ecclesiae Rectoribus? Aff.

An Summae potestates civiles gaudeant potestate Clavium? Neg.

An Nationalis quaelibet Ecclesia jus habeat constituendi in ritibus & ceremoniis? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris NICOLAI STRATFORD è Coll. Trinitatis.

An Christus satisfecerit pro peccatis? Aff.

An Detur peccatum veniale? Neg.

An Leges humanae obligent Conscientiam? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ROBERTI FIELD è Coll. Trinitatis.

An Detur perfectio in hac vita? Neg.

An Liceat operari ex intuitu mercedis? Aff.

An Lex Moralis obliget Christianos? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris DAN. WHITB. è Coll. T [...]

An Panis Eucharisticus sit Transubstantiatus? Neg.

An Christiani id quod comedunt latriâ adorare debeant? Neg.

An Cultus D. Virgini à Latinis exhibitus sit Idololatricus? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris BEN. WOODROFFE ex Aede Christi.

An Licitum sit Christiano bellum gerere? Aff.

An Magistratus summus sit custos utriusque Tabulae? Aff.

An Ad Juramentum Fidelitatis Christianos adigere possit summus Magistratus? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ROBERTI FRAMPTON ex Aede Christi.

An Papa sit Caput Ecclesiae Universalis? Neg.

An Papa sit infallibilis? Neg.

An Calix in Eucharistiâ Laicis rectè adimitur? Neg.

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae Oxonii in Ʋesperiis.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ROBERTI HOLT è Coll. Om. Animarum.

An Pacta cum praedonibus sint servanda? Aff.

An Monetae solvendae valor tempore contractus sit inspiciendus? Aff. actum de haereditate viventis valeat? Neg.

QVAESTIONES in Medicina discutiendae Oxonii in Vesperiis.

Quaestiones Inceptoris JOHAN. LUFFE ex Aula. B. Mar. Virg.

An Vires opiatorum sint frigiditati tribuendae? Neg.

An Ex Urinâ & pulsu certa fiat morborum dijudicatio? Neg.

An Concoctio fiat ab acido fermento? Aff.

Quaestiones in Philosophiâ discutiendae Oxonii in Ʋesperiis.

An Mores animi sequantur temperamentum Corporis? Aff.

An Dentur qualitates occultae? Aff.

An Anima sit ex traduce? Neg.

Resp. GƲL. DOBSON Incept. è Coll. Trinit.

QUAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA discutiendae Oxonii in COMITIIS, Decimo quarto die Julii Ann. Dom. 1673.

An Ecclesia Romana sit Idololatrica? Aff.

An Discessio Ecclesiae Anglicanae à Romanâ sit Sch ismatica? Neg.

An Pontificii aut Non-Conformistae ab Ecclesiâ Anglicanâ ex ratione justâ recedant? Neg.

Resp. GƲL. ASSHETON S. T. B. è Col▪ Aen. Nasi.

Quaestiones in Jure Civili discutiendae in Comitiis.

An Justitiarii ad pacem possint esse Judices competentes in causis dilapidationum & decimarum? Neg.

An Judex Testamenti legatum factum ad conventiculum illicitum possit in usum pium commutare? Aff.

An Proprium confessus crimen appellare possit? Neg.

Resp. STEPH. BRICE A. M. è Coll. Magd.

Quaestiones in Medicina discutiendae in Comitiis.

An Tantum Sanguis nutriat? Neg.

An Sanguis sanguificet? Aff.

An Detur flammula Cordis? Neg.

Resp. GƲL. COKER Med. Bac. è Coll. Om. An.

Quaestiones in Philosophia discutiendae in Comitiis.

An Mendacium sit licitum? Neg.

An Luna sit habitabilis? Neg.

An Passiones incidant in virum sapientem? Aff.

Resp. THO. LESSEY Incept. è Col. Wadham.

§

§

OXONII, Ex Officina LEONARDI LICHFIELD, Acad. Typog. Anno Domini 1673.

Information about this book

Title statement

Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis duodecimo [decimo quarto] die mensis Julii anno Domini 1673

University of Oxford.

Edition statement

1673

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A90325

ID [STC]

Wing O948

ID [STC]

ESTC R42829

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

38875818

ID [OCLC]

ocm 38875818

ID [VID]

152312

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A90325)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 152312)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2292:12)

Source

— Quæstiones in s. theologia [jure civili, philosophia, medicina] discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis duodecimo [decimo quarto] die mensis Julii anno Domini 1673, University of Oxford..

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.).

Ex officina Leonardi Lichfield Acad. Typog.,. Oxonii :: anno Dom. 1673.. (Printed in two columns.) (Reproduction of original in: Bodleian Library.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.