An Extract out of several libells

An Extract out of several libells

Table of contents

An Extract out of Several LIBELLS.

Remarques upon Sir W. Smiths Speech at Hicks-Hall.

The Third Part of the No Protestant Plot.

Rights of the Kingdom.

The Ignoramus-Justices. Being an Answer to the Order of Sessions at Hicks-Hall.

Reflexions.

[Page]

An Extract out of Several LIBELLS.

Remarques upon Sir W. Smiths Speech at Hicks-Hall.

1. ALL Considering People will now see that Conventiclers are notBaldwin. Punish'd and Ruin'd for Holding Conventicles, but for being zealous for the Protestant Religion, and Government by Advice of Parliament against Popery, and Clandestine Arbitrary Councells. Postscript.

The Third Part of the No Protestant Plot.

2. The Best and Wisest of the Kings Subjects are fill'd with Jelousies Baldwin▪ that it is through a Concert with the French Monarchy, that Parliaments are either Call'd, Prorogu'd, or Dissolv'd, &c. Pag. 21. Line. 1.

3. Such is is the Papists Influence upon Publique Ministers, and so greatBaldwin. is their Power in all our Councells, that we can neither obtain the having the Principall Conspirators brought to Legall Tryall, nor procure any Effectuall Provision towards the Saving our selves, and securing our Religion, from their Cruelty and Rage, & Deinceps. Page 25. Line 18.

4. Macnamarra told Smith that He had been with Sir L. J. who had given Baldwin. him a Long Lesson, which nevertheless he had learn'd, though it was very long. To that height of Impudence & Villany was this Varlet arrived, through the Encouragement, and Protection, which he receiv'd from Some Great Persons, whom it would have better become to have Employ'd their Authority and Power according to the Rule of Justice, and Honour. P. 96. 97.

5. That call'd Treason in the Earl of Argyle, which the Common Reason Baldwin. of Mankinde, and all the Law of the World Justifies. P. 15. Line 12.

Rights of the Kingdom.

6. Let us Discuss it by Law and Reason, what is our Legal Fealty? howJo. Kidgell & Ri. Baldwin. made? how Limited? how Kept, or how DISSOLV'D, P. 11.

7. Allegeance was ad Legem; to the Laws, the Kingdom, and the Kingdoms Kidgell & Baldwin. Good or Profit, together with the King, P. 18.

8. [If an English King was Elective by the Common Law, the Kingdom Kidgell & Baldwin. might Prescribe against Late Statutes. P. 25.] And then he says that the King was Elective by the Common Law, referring to Huberts Speech at the Coronation of King John.

9. Which seemeth most Rightly to State the Nature of Succession, as itKidgell & Baldwin. was in This Kingdom. So that All did Amount but to this, that if a King had such Children, so Qualify'd, and so Educated that they were above others in Virtue, Wisdom and True Worth; (or at least Caeteris Pares) they were the most likely Candidates for the Crown. P. 75.

The Ignoramus-Justices. Being an Answer to the Order of Sessions at Hicks-Hall.

10- Some Directions to the Officers that may be Threaten'd or PerswadedJaneway. to Act by such Unwarrantable Orders, from such IGNORAMUS-JUSTICES. Title-Page.

Reflexions.

Tyrranny, and Popery, Num. [1] Confederacy with France, [2] Popish Ministers and Councells, [3] Subornation in the Kings Ministers, [4] Argyle Justify'd, [5] Our Allegeance may be Dissolv'd. [6] Allegeance to the Kingdom, [7] If the Kingdom was Elective by the Common Law it continues so, [8] He Pronounces that so it was, and Concludes that so it is. [9] The Middlesex Bench call'd IGNORAMUS-JUSTICES. [10]

Information about this book

Title statement

An Extract out of several libells

Edition statement

1683

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A84313

ID [STC]

Wing E3915A

ID [STC]

ESTC R42490

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

36282102

ID [OCLC]

ocm 36282102

ID [VID]

150044

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A84313)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 150044)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2226:17)

Source

— An Extract out of several libells,

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.).

s.n.,. [London? :: 1683?]. (Place and date of publication suggested by Wing (2nd ed.).) (Reproduction of original in the Newberry Library.) (Remarques upon Sir W. Smiths speech at Hicks-Hall -- The third part of No Protestant plot -- Rights of the Kingdom -- The ignoramus- justices, being and answer to the order of sessions at Hicks-Hall.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.