After debate about the printing and publishing of the orders of the 16th of January last, which followeth in these words, viz. It is this day ordered by the Lords spirtiuall and temporall, in the High Court of Parliament: that the divine service be performed, ... England and Wales. Parliament. House of Lords. 1641 Approx. 4 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 1 1-bit group-IV TIFF page image. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A83883 Wing E2787A Thomason 669.f.3[18] ESTC R209707 99868574 99868574 160576

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

 Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A83883) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 160576) Images scanned from microfilm: (Thomason Tracts ; 245:669f3[18]) After debate about the printing and publishing of the orders of the 16th of January last, which followeth in these words, viz. It is this day ordered by the Lords spirtiuall and temporall, in the High Court of Parliament: that the divine service be performed, ... England and Wales. Parliament. House of Lords. 1 sheet ([1] p.) s.n., [London : 1641] Title from caption and opening words of text. Imprint from Wing. Dated: 9⁰ September 1641. Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.

 eng Church and state -- Great Britain -- 17th century -- Early works to 1800. 2007-09 Assigned for keying and markup 2007-11 Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2007-12 Sampled and proofread 2007-12 Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-02 Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
After debate about the Printing and Publishing of the Orders of the 16th of January laſt, which followeth in theſe words, Ʋiz.

IT is this day Ordered by the Lords Spirituall and Temporall, in the High Court of Parliament: That the Divine Service be performed, as it is appointed by the Acts of Parliament of this Realme. And that all ſuch as ſhall diſturbe that wholſome Order, ſhalbe SEVERELY puniſhed according to Law. And the Parſons, Ʋiccars, and Curats, in their ſeverall Pariſhes, ſhall forbeare to introduce any Rites or Ceremonies that may give offence, otherwiſe then thoſe which are eſtabliſhed by the Laws of the Land.

9o September 1641.

Reſolved upon the Queſtion, That the Order of the 16. January, 1640. ſhalbe Printed and publiſhed.

Lords aſſenting, Biſhop of Lincolne. Lord Mowbery. L. Cleveland. L. Dunſmore. L. Dover. L. Denby. L. Portland. L. Carnarvan. L. Coventree. L. Newarke. Lords diſaſſenting, Lord Keeper. L. Privy Seale. L. Bedford. L. Mandavil. L. Newport: L. Whorton. L. Clare. L. Hunſdon.

It being put to the Queſtion, whether the Lords would Order that it ſhould be voated that the ſaid Order of the 16th of January ſhould be Printed and publiſhed, before a Conference deſired with the Houſe of Commons concernit. We whoſe Names are underwritten did diſaſſent; and having before the puting of the Queſtion demanded our right of Proteſtation, did accordingly make our Proteſtation: That We held it fit and neceſſary to have the conſent of the Houſe of Commous in thoſe things which concerne ſo neerly the quiet and Government of the Church: And therfore we deſired to have a Conference with the Houſe of Commons before any Concluſive Order were Printed or publiſhed herein; Eſpecially the Houſe of Commons having but lately brought to us, (and deſired the conſent of our Houſe unto) certaine Voates of theirs againſt divers Innovations, in, or about the Worſhip of God, lately practiſed in this Kingdome, without Warrant of Law. And therfore to acquit our ſelves of the dangers and Inconveniences that might ariſe by the Printing and publiſhing of the ſaid Order of the 16th of January, as binding to the whole Kingdome, without deſiring the conſent of the Houſe of Commons, We did proteſt our diſaſſents to this Voate: And doe thus enter it as aforeſaid.

Lord Privy Seale. L. Bedford. L. Warwicke. L. Newport. L. Clare. L. Hunſdon. L. Mandavill. L. Whorton.