The case and circumstances of paper-making in England truly stated And by the paper-sellers humbly offered to the consideration of this present Parliament, as reasons against the passing of a bill, intituled An act for the encouragement and better establishing the making of white-writing and printing-paper. The same being misrepresented in a paper stiled, The case of the Company of White-Paper-makers.

The case and circumstances of paper-making in England truly stated And by the paper-sellers humbly offered to the consideration of this present Parliament, as reasons against the passing of a bill, intituled An act for the encouragement and better establishing the making of white-writing and printing-paper. The same being misrepresented in a paper stiled, The case of the Company of White-Paper-makers.

Table of contents

The CASE AND Circumstances of Paper-making IN ENGLAND TRULY STATED. And by the PAPER-SELLERS Humbly Offered to the Consideration of this Present PARLIAMENT, As REASONS against the Passing of a BILL, intituled An Act for the Encouragement and better Establishing the making of White-Writing and Printing-Paper. The same being Misrepresented in a Paper stiled, The Case of the Company of White-Paper-makers.

[Page]

The CASE AND Circumstances of Paper-making IN ENGLAND TRULY STATED.
And by the PAPER-SELLERS Humbly Offered to the Consideration of this Present PARLIAMENT, As REASONS against the Passing of a BILL, intituled An Act for the Encouragement and better Establishing the making of White-Writing and Printing-Paper.
The same being Misrepresented in a Paper stiled, The Case of the Company of White-Paper-makers.

THAT the Art of making White and Brown-paper was brought into England by Sir John Spelman a German, to whom King James I. in the Second year of his Reign granted a Patent for fourteen years, and also for his encouragement to settle the Trade in this Kingdom gave him an Estate of 200 l. per Annum at Dartford in Kent, where he erected a Paper Mill, which is to this day imployed in making of White and Brown-paper.

That White Writing and Printing Paper is but a degree of goodness from Courser Sorts, and the making thereof no New Invention.

That the Grant to the Pretended Inventors for their sole making of White Paper, upon which the intended Act is grounded, is a Monopoly and against Law; and all such Grants are declared to be void in Law, and all Bodys Politick and Corporate are disabled to exercise any such by the Statute, 21. Jac. cap. 3.

That the same Grant was obtained through their specious pretences of supplying the whole Kingdom, and imploying of Fifty Mills, which they have not performed, nor can, for that in fifteen years since they had their First Patent, they have imployed but five Mills; and if they had more, cannot procure Materials sufficient for making of a twentieth part of the quantity of White Paper used in England; and their want of such materials is most evident by their using their Mills, designed for White Paper, in the making of very great quantities of Brown.

That whereas they have insinuated that vast sums of mony have been sent out of this Nation yearly to France for Paper, by a computation taken thereof, there is not above 50000 l. worth of Paper in a year imported from Germany, Holland, France, Italy, and other plac [...]s, and a great part of that is the Returns of English Manufactures and Merchandizes, and of great advantage for the imployment of English Shipping; the Freight, by reason of the Bulk thereof, being very considerable.

That Foreign Paper was not brought into England, because the like was not, or could not be made here, but because Materials proportion [...]ble to the quantity required, could not be had here to make a sufficient supply, and that it was made abroad at a cheaper rate; so that the prohibiting the importation of French Commodities, as was done by an Act of the last Parliament, whereby the prizes of such Paper is advanced, is incouragement sufficient for the Paper Makers in general to make▪ and they now imploy themselves in making of such Papers, and having above a hundred Mills in England, can make greater quantities than the new Pretenders thereto, who have but five: and if the Paper-makers in general, and not a select Company, do exercise the same, they will endeavor to exceed one another, and by that means such Paper will be made better, and sold cheaper than otherwise, and the English Nation better supplied, and the same, or a greater number of Poor maintained.

That the Importation of French Paper being already prohibited by the last mentioned Act, there is no benefit can accrue by this intended Act to the Nation or Trade of Paper-making, nor can such Act answer the Title given it: For instead of encouraging, it will discourage ingenuous Workmen, who through servitude are free of the Trade, to serve others who have no right to it, and dividing the Trade will ruine it, and not establish it.

That the intended Act is not to make all the Paper Makers a Corporation or to Regulate the Trade, or to furnish the Makers with Materials, or to limit the Work only to English men, and such as have served Apprentiships, or to ascertain the goodness, or prizes of Paper, or for the like good purposes, as other Societies of men have been incorporated; but to subject the whole to the power, and for the benefit of some particular men, as evidently appears by their Proposals added to their Case; which Proposals can be of no Advantage to the Subscribers, unless the persons concerned, by imposing upon Owners of Mills, to have them at small Rents, and by paying small Wages, and exacting great prizes for their Paper, design to make their gain out of other mens Estates, and poor mens Labours.

That if the said intended Act should pass, it will allow of a Monopoly, which is repugnant to the Act 21. Jac. which expresly saith amongst other things, that all Grants for the sole making of any thing within this Realm shall be void, and that all Bodies Politick and Corporate shall be disabled to put in ure any such Monopoly.

That thereby also above a hundred Paper Mills and all dependents thereupon will be destroyed, and divers Paper-makers who have taken long Leases, and are in Bonds and Covenants to pay great Rents will be disabled to pay the same, to the Ruin of them, and of above a thousand Families.

That the same will also be a bad President, and of dangerous Consequence to all other Crafts; for some men pretending to a greater Excellency in any Craft than others, may by the like means strip all the rest of their Freedoms, Trades, and Livelyhoods, and then impose upon all that shall work, or buy of them at their pleasure.

That the Case of the Paper makers, doth much concern the Paper Sellers? for that as the Makers have truly set forth the making of Brown Paper alone will not pay the Charges; and that if (as by the intended Act) they shall be Limited in making White Sort of Paper, their Mills will be their Ruin; and then by Consequence, no Paper of any Sort can be made but by the Patentees, and, there being no other Market to go to, may Sell it when, where, in what manner, and at what prize they please; by which means all the Paper Sellers in London, who are very numerous, and have served Apprentiships to, and brought up in that Trade, which is a distinct Trade of it self, will be deprived of their livelyhoods, and many of them and other Families impoverished.

It is therefore manifest (by the small Number of Mills now imployed by the said New Pretenders, as also by the small quantity of Materials to be found for making White paper, the advance of their price being already more than double) that it is unreasonable as well as against Law; for some few persons to have the sole priviledge of making Writing and printing Paper, which will most certain [...] ruin very many of the Ancient Paper makers, and be a very great detriment to the many Traders in Paper; and how mischievous it [...] to establish a Monopoly, for ingrossing an Ancient English Manufacture, is Humbly Submitted to your Honours Consideration.

This Sheet is the Common Printing Paper made by the Old Paper Makers.

Information about this book

Title statement

The case and circumstances of paper-making in England truly stated And by the paper-sellers humbly offered to the consideration of this present Parliament, as reasons against the passing of a bill, intituled An act for the encouragement and better establishing the making of white-writing and printing-paper. The same being misrepresented in a paper stiled, The case of the Company of White-Paper-makers.

Edition statement

1699

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A81258

ID [STC]

Wing C847

ID [STC]

ESTC R205744

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

99896505

ID [PROQUEST]

99896505

ID [VID]

132321

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A81258)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 132321)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2424:4)

Source

— The case and circumstances of paper-making in England truly stated And by the paper-sellers humbly offered to the consideration of this present Parliament, as reasons against the passing of a bill, intituled An act for the encouragement and better establishing the making of white-writing and printing-paper. The same being misrepresented in a paper stiled, The case of the Company of White-Paper-makers., Company of White Paper Makers (London, England).

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.)

s.n.,. [S.l. :: 1699]. (Date of publication from Wing (CD-ROM edition).) (Reproduction of original in the Lincoln's Inn Library, London.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.