AN ENQUIRY Into the Measures of SUBMISSION TO THE Supream Authority.

And of the Grounds upon which it may be Lawful, or Ne­cessary for Subjects, to Defend their RELIGION Lives and Liberties.

Printed in the Year, 1689.

An Enquiry into the Measures of SUBMISSION, to the Supream Authority: And of the Grounds upon which it may be Lawful or Necessary for Subjects, to Defend their RELIGION, LIVES and LIBERTIES.

THis Enquirie cannot be Regularly made, but by taking, in the first place, a true and full view of the Nature of Civil Society, and more particularly of the Nature of Supream power, Whether it is lodged in one or moe Persons.

1. It is certain that the Law of Nature has put no difference nor subordination among Men, except it be that of Children to Par­ents, or of Wives to their Husbands; So that with Relation to the Law of Nature, all Men are born free; And this Liberty must still be supposed Entire, unlesse so far at it is limited by Contracts Provisions and Laws; for a Man can either bind himself to be a Ser­vant, or sell himself to be a Slave, by which he becomes in the power of another, only so far as it was provided by the Contract: Since all that Liberty which was not expresly given away, re­mains still entire; so that the Plea for Liberty alwayes proves it self, unless it appears that it is given up, or limited by any special Agreement.

2 It is no less certain, that as the light of Nature has planted in all Men a Natural principle of the Love of Life, and of a desire to preserve it; so the common principles of all Religion agree in this, that GOD having set Us in this World, we are bound to preserve that Being, which he has given U [...], by all just and Lawful ways. Now this Duty of Self-preservation, is exerted in instances of two sorts; The one are in the resisting of violent Agressors, The other are the taking of just Revenges of those who have invaded U [...] so se­cretly, that We could not prevent them, and so violently that We [Page 4]could not resist them. In which cases the Principle of Self-preser­vation warrants us, both to recover what is our own, with just Dam­ages; And also to Put such unjust persons out of a capacity of do­ing the like injuries any more, either to our selves or to any others. Now in these instances of Self-preservation, this difference is to be observed, that the first cannot be limited, by any slow forms, since a pressing Danger requires a vigorous Repulse, and cannot admit of delay; whereas the second, of taking Revenges or Reparations, is not of such haste, but that it may be brought under Rules and Forms.

3 The true and original Notion of Civil Society and Government is, that it is a com-promise made by such a body of Men, by which they resign up the right of demanding Reparations, either in the way of justice, against one another, or in the way of War against their Neighbours; to such a single person or to such a body of men as they think fit to trust with this. And in the management of this Civil Society, great distinction is to be made between the power of making Laws for the regulating the conduct of it, and the power of executing these Laws; the Supream Authority must still be supposed to be lodged with those who have the Legislative Power reserved to them; but not with those who have only the Ex­ecutive, which is plainly a Trust, when it is separated from the Legis­lative power; and all Trusts by their nature Import, that those to whom they are given, are accountable, even tho that it should not be expresly specified in the words of the Trust it self.

4. It cannot be supposed by the principles of Natural Religion, that GOD has authorised any one Form of Government, any other way than as the general Rules of Order and of Justice oblige all Men not to subvert Constitutions, nor disturb the peace of Mankind, nor invade those Rights, with which the Law may have vested some persons: For it is certain that as private Contracts lodge or trans­late private Rights; so the publick Laws can likewise lodge such Rights, Perogatives and Revenues, in those under whose protecti­on they put themselves; and in such a manner that they may come [Page 5]to have as good a title to these, as any private person can have to his property; so that it becomes an Act of high injustice and violence to invade these, which is so far a greater sin than any such Actions would be against a private person; As the publick Peace and Order is preferable to all private considerations whatsoever. So that in truth, the principles of Natural Religion, give those that are in Autho­rity no power at all, but they do only secure them in the possession of that which is theirs by Law. And as no considerations of Religion can bind me to pay another more than I indeed owe him, but do only bind me more strictly to pay what I owe; So the considerations of Religion do indeed bring Subjects under stricter Obligations, to pay all due allegiance and Submission to their Princes; but they do not at all extend that Allegiance further than the Law carries it. And though a Man has no Divine Right to his property, but has acquired it by Humane means, such as Suc­cession or Industry, yet he has a security for the enjoyment of it, from a Di­vine Right; so tho Princes have no immediate warrants from Heaven, ei­ther for their Original Titles, or for the extent of them, yet they are se­cured in the possession of them by the Principles and Rules of Natural Religion.

5. It is to be considered that as a Private Person, can bind himself to another Mans service by different degrees, either as an ordinary Ser­vant for wages, or as an appropriat for a longer time, as an Apprentice, or by a total giving himself up to another, as in the case of Slavery. In all which cases the General name of Master may be equally used, yet the degrees of his power are to be judged by the nature of the Con­tract; so likewise Bodies of Men can give themselves up in different degrees, to the conduct of others. And therefore though all those may carry the same name of King yet every ones Power is to be taken from the Measures of the Authority which is lodged in him, and not from any general Speculations founded on some Equivocal terms, such as King, Soveraign or Supream.

6, It's certain, that GOD, as the Creator and Governour of the World, may set up whom he will, to rule over other Men; But this Declaration of His will, must be made evident by Prophets, or other [Page 6]extraordinary Men sent of Him, who have some manifest proofs of the Divine Authority, that is committed to them, on such occasions, and upon such Persons declaring the well of GOD, in favour of any others, that Declaration is to be submitted to and obeyed. But this pretence of a Divine Delegation, can be carried no farther than to those who are thus expresly marked out, and is unjustly claimed by those who can prove no such Declaration to have been ever made in Favour of them, or their Families. Nor does it appear Reasonable to conclude from their being in possessions, that it is the will of GOD that it should be so, this justifies all Vsurpers, when they are successeful.

7 The Measures of Power, and by consequence of Obedience, must be taken from the expresse Laws of any State, or Body of Men, from the Oaths that they swear, or from Immemorial pre­scription, and a long possession, which both give a Title, and in a long tract of time make a bad one become good, since prescription when it passes the memory of man, and is not disputed by any other Pretender, gives by the common sense of all men, a just and good title: So upon the whole matter, the degrees of all Civil Au­thority, are to be taken either from expresse Laws, Immemorial Custome, or from particular Oaths, which the Subjects swear to their Princes: This being still to be said down for a principle, that in all the disputes between Power and Liberty, Power must always be proved, but Liberty proves it self; the one being founded only upon positive Law, and the other upon the Law of Nature.

8. If from the General Principles of humane Society, and na­tural Religion, we carry this matter to be examined by the Scriptures, it is clear that all the passages that are in the Old Testa­ment, are not to be made use of in this matter, of neither side. For as the land of Ganaan, was given to the Jews by an immediat g ant from Heaven, so GOD reserved still this to himself, and to the Declarations that he should make from time to time, either by his Prophets, or by the answers that came from the Cloud of [Page 7]Glory that was between the Cherubims; to set up Judges or Kings over them, and to pull them down again as he thought fit, here was an express Delegation made by God, and therefore all that was done in that Dispensation, either for or against Princes, Is not to be made use of in any other State, that is founded on another bottom and Constitution, and all the expressions in the Old Testa­ment relating to Kings, since they belong to persons that were im­mediatly designed by God, are without any sort of reason ap­plyed to those, who can pretend to no such Designation, neither for themselves nor for their Ancestors.

9. As for the New Testament, it is plain, that there are no rules given in it, neither for the Forms of Government in general, nor for the degrees of any one Form in particular, but the general rules of Justice, order and peace, being established in it upon higher Motives, and more binding considerations, than ever they were in any other Religion whatsoever, we are most strictly bound by it, to observe the constitution in which we are: And it is plain, that the rules set us in the Gospel, can be carried no further. It is indeed clear from the New Testament, that the Christian Religion as such, gives us no grounds to defend or propogat it by force. It is a Doctrine of the Cross, and of Faith, and Patience under it: And if by the order of Divine providence, and of any constitution of Government, under which we are born, we are brought under sufferings, for our professing of it, we may indeed retire and fly out of any such Countrey, if we can; but if that is denyed us, we must then according to this Religion, submit to those sufferings under which we may be brought, considering that God will be Glorified by us in so doing, and that he will both support us under our sufferings, and gloriously reward us for them.

This was the State of the Christian Religion, during the three first Centuries, under Heathen Emperours and a Constitution in which Pa­ganism was established by Law; But if by the Laws of any Govern­ment, the Christian Religion, or any form of it, is become a part of the Subjects Property, it then falls under another consideratin, [Page 8]not as it is a Religion, but as it is become one of the Principal Rights of the Subjects, to believe and profess it, And then we must judge of the Invasions made on that, as we do of any other Invasion that is made on Our Rights.

10 All the passages in the New Testament that relate to Civil Go­vernment are to be expounded as they were truely meaned, in op­position to that false notion of the Jews, who believed them­selves to be so immediatly under the Divine Authority, that they would not become the Subjects of any other Power; particularly of one that was not of their Nation, or of their Religion: there­fore they thought, they could not be under the Roman-yoke, nor bound to pay Tribute to Caesar, but judged that they were only subject out of Fear, by reason of the Force that lay on them, but not for Conscience sake: And so in all their Dispersion, both at Room and elsewhere, they thought they were Gods Freemen: and made use of this pretended Liberty as a cloak of maliciousness. In Opposition to all which, since in a course of many years, they had asked the protection of the Roman-yoke, and were come under their Authority, our Saviour ordered them to continue in them by his saying, Render to Caesar that which is Caesars; and both St. Paul in his Epistle to the Romans, and St. Peter in his General Epistle, have very positively condemned that pernicious Maxim, but without any formal Declarations made of the Rules or Measures of Go­vernment. And since both the People and Senate of Rome had ac­knowledged the power that Augustus had indeed violently usur­ped, it became legal when it was thus submitted to, and confir­med both by the Senate and People: And it was establisht in his Family by a long prescription, when these Epistles were writ: So that upon the whole matter, all that is in the New Testament upon this Subject, imports no more but that all Christians are bound to acquiesce in the Government, and submit to it, according to the constitution that is setled by Law.

11 Weare then at last brought to the Constitution of our English Government; So that no General Considerations from Specula­tions about Soveraign Power, nor from any passages either of the Old and New Testament, ought to determine u [...] in this matter; which must be fixed from the Laws and Regulations that have been made among Us. It is then certain, that with Relation to the Executive part of the Government, the Law has Iudged that singly in the King; So that the whole administration o [...] it is in him: but the Legislative Power is Lodg [...]d between the King and the two Houses of Parliament; So that the Power of making and Repealing Laws, is not singly in the King, but only so far as the two Houses concur with him. It is also clear, that the King has such a determined extent of Prerogrative, beyond which he has no Authority: As for instance, if he Levies Money of his People, without a Law impowering him to it, he goes beyond the limits of his Power, and asks that to which he has no Right, so that there lyes no obligation on the Subject to grant it; And it any in his Name use Violence for the obtaining it, they are to be looked on as so many Robbers, that invade our Property and they be­ing violent Aggressors, the Principle of Self-preservation seems here to take place, and to warrant as a violent a resistance.

12. There is nothing more evident, than that England is a free Nation, that has its Liberties and Properties reserved to it by many positive and express Laws: if then we have a right to our Property, we must likewise be supposed to have a right to preserve it; for these Rights are by the Law secured against the Invasions of the prerogative, & by consequence we must have a right so preserve them against those Invasions. It is also evidently declared by our Law, that all Orders and Warrants, that are issued out in oppo­sition to them, are null of themselves; And by consequence, any that pretend to have commissions from the King so those ends are to be considered as if they had n [...]ne at all, Since these com­missions being void of themselves, are indeed no commissions in the construction of the Law; And therefore those who act in vertue of them, are still to be considered, as Private person who come to In­vade and disturb us. It is also to be observed, that there are some points that are justly disputable and doub [...]ful, and others that are [Page 10]so manifest, that it is plain that any Objections that can be made to them, are rather forced pretences, than so much as plausible colours. It is true, if the case is doubtful, the interest of the publick Peace and Order ought to carry it; but the case is quite different, when the Invasions that are made upon Liberty and Property, are plain and visible to all that consider them.

13. The main and great difficulty here, is, that tho our Govern­ment does indeed assert the Liberty of the Subject, yet there are many express Laws made, that lodge the Militia singly in the King, that make it plainly unlawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King, or any commissioned by him; And these Laws have been put in the form of an Oath, which all that have born any Imployment either in Church or State have sworn; And therefore these Laws, for the assuring our Liberties, do indeed bind the Kings conscience, and may affect his Ministers; yet since it is a Maxim of our Law, that the King can do no wrong, these cannot be carried so far as to justifie our taking Arms against him, be the transgressions of Law ever so many and so manifest: And since this has been the constant Doctrine of the Church of Eng­land, it will be a very heavy Imputation on us, if it appears, that tho we held these opinions, as long as the Court and the Crown have favoured us, yet as soon as the Court turns against us, we change our Principles.

14. Here is the true difficulty of this whole matter, and therefore it ought to be exactly considered. First, all general words, how large soever, are still supposed to have a tacite Exception, and reserves in them, if the matter seems to require it. Children are com­manded to Obey their Parents in all things: Wives are declared by the Scripture, to be subject to their Husband in all things; as the Church is unto Christ: And yet how comprehensive soever these words may seem to be, there is still a reserve to be understood in them; And tho by our Form of Marriage the Parties swear to one another till death them do part, yet few doubt but this bond is dissolved by Adultery, tho it is not named; for odious things [Page 11]ought not to be suspected, and therefore not named upon such oc­casions: But when they fall out, they every still their own force with them. 2. when there seems to be a Contradiction between two Articles in the Constitution, we ought to examine which of the two is the most evident, and the most important, and so we ought to fix upon it, and then we must give such an accomodating sense to that which seems to contradict it, that so we may reconcile those o­gether. Here then are two seeming contradictions in our constituti­on: The one is the Publick Liberties of the Nation; the other is the renouncing of all resistance, in case that were Invaded▪ It is plain, that our Liberty is only a thing that we enjoy at the Kings dis­cretion, and during his pleasure, if the other against all Resistance is to be understood according to the out most Extent of the wordy. Therefore since the chief Design of Our whole Law, and all the several Rules of our Constitution, is to secure and maintain Our Liberty, we ought to lay that down for a conclusion, that it is both the most plain and the most important of the two: And the efore the other Article against Resistance ought to be so softned, as that it do not destroy this. 3. Since it is by a Law that Resistance is condem­ned, we ought to understand it in such a sense, as that it doth not de­stroy all other Laws: And therefore the intent of this Law must only relate to the Executive Power, which is in the King, and not to the Legislative, in which we cannot suppose that our Legislators who made that Law, intended to give up that, which we plainly see they resolved still to preserve intire, according to the Ancient Constitution. So then the not resisting the King, can only be ap­plyed to the Executive Power, that so upon no pretence of ill Ad­ministrations in the Execution of the Law, it should be lawful to resist him; but this cannot with any reason be extended to an Inva­sion of the Leg slative Power, or to a total subversion of the Go­vernment. For it being plain, that the Law did not Design to lodge that power in the King; it is also plain, that i [...] did not intend to se­cure him in it, in case he should set about it 4. The Law mention­ing the King, or those Commissionate by him, sh [...]ws plainly, that it only Designed to secure the King in the Executive Power: For the word Commission necessarly imports this, since if it is not according [Page 12]to Law, it is no Commission; And by consequence, those who Act in Vertue of it, are not commissionate by the King in the sense of the Law. The King likewise imports a Prince clothed by Law with the Regal Prerogative, but of he goes to Subvert the whole Foundation of the Government, he subverts that by which he himself has his power, and by consequence he annulls his own power; and then he ceases to be King, having endeavoured to destroy that, upon which his own Authority is founded.

It is acknowledged by the greatest asserters of Monarchical power, that in some cases a King may fall from his power, and in other cases that he may fall from the exercise of it. His deserting his people, his going about to enslave or sell them to any other, or a furious going abour to destroy them, are in the opinion of the most Monarchical Lawyers, such abuses, that they naturally divest those that are guilty of them, of their whole Authority. Infamy or Phren­zid do also put them under the Guardian-ship of others. All the crowned heads of Europe have, at least secretly approv'd of the put­ting the late King of Portugal under a Guardian-ship, and the keep­ing him still Prisoner for a few Acts of Rage, that had been fatal to a very few persons: And even our Court gave the first coun­tenance to it, tho of all others the late King had the most reason to have done it at least last of all, since it justified a Younger brother's supplanting the Elder; yet the evidence of the thing carried it even against Interest. Therefore if a King go about to subvert the Go­vernment, and to overturn the whole Constitution, he by this must be supposed either to fall from his power, or at least from the exer­cise of it, so far as that he ought to be put under Guardians; and according to the case of Portugal, the next Heir falls naturally to be the Guardian.

The next thing to be Considered, is, to see in Fact whether the Foun­dations of this Government have been struck at, and whether those Er­tors, that have been perhaps committed, are only such Malver [...]ati­ans, as ought to be Imputed only to Humane Frailty, and to the Igno­rance, Inadvertencies, or Passions, to which all Princes may be Subject, [Page 13]as well as other men, but this will best appear, if we consider, what are the Fundamental Points of our Government, and the chief Securities that we have for our Liberties.

The Authority of the Law is indeed all in one Word, so that if the King pretends to a power to Dispense with Laws, there is nothing left, upon which the Subject can depend; And yet as if Dispensing Power were not enough, if Laws are wholly Suspended for all time coming, this is plainly a repealing of them, when likewise the Men, in whose hands the Administration of Justice is put by Law, such as Judges and Sheriffs are allowed to tread all Laws under foot, even These that infer an incapacity on themselves, if they violat them; This is such a break­ing of the whole Constitution, that we can no more have the Ad­ministration of Justice, so that it is really a Dissolution of the Govern­ment; since all Tryals, Sentences, and the Executions of them are become so many unlawful Acts, that are null and void of themselves.

The next thing in our Constitution, which secures to us our Laws and Liberties, is a Free and Lawful Parliament▪ Now not to mention the breach of the Law of Triennial Parliament, it being above three years since we had a Session, that enacted any Law; Methods have been taken, and are daily a taking, that render this impossible. Parliaments ought to be chosen with an intire Liberty, and without either Force or Pre-engage­ments: Whereas if all men are required before hand to enter into Engage­ments, how they will Vote, if they were chosen themselves; Or how they will give their Votes in the Electing of others; This is plainly such a pre­paration to a Parliament, as would indeed make it no Parliament, but a Cabal, if one were chosen after all that Corruption of Persons, who had pre­engaged themselves; and after the Threatning and Turning out of all Persons out of Employments who had Refused to do it; And if there are such daily Regulations made in the Towns, That it is plain those who manage them▪ intend at last to put such a number of Men in the Corporations as will cer­tainly chuse the persons who are recommended to them. But above all, if there are such a number of Sheriffs and Mayors made over England, by whom the Elections must be conducted and returned, who are now under an incapacity by Law, and so are no Legal Officers, and by consequence these Elections that passe under their Authority are null and void; If, I say it is clear that things are brought to this, then the Government is dis­solved, because it is impossible to have a Free and Legal Parliament in this [Page 14]this State of things. If then both the Authority of the Law, and the con­stitution of the Parliament are struck at and dissolved, here is a plain sub­version of the whole Government. But if we enter next into the particular branches of the Government, we will find: the like disorder among them all.

The Protestant Religion, and the Church of England, make a great Article of our Government. the Latter being secuted notionly of old by Magna Charta, but by many special Laws made of late; And there are particu­lar Laws made in K. Charles the First, and the late King [...]s time, Ce [...]secu them from all Commissions that the King can raise for Judging or Brenringing them: If then in opposition to this a Court so condemned is issur [...]d which proceeds to Judge and Censure the Clergy, and even to deisscte them of their Free bolds, without so much as the Form of a Tryal, tho this is the most indispensable Law, of all these that secures the Property of England: And if the King pretends that he can require the Clergy to publish all his Arbitrary Declarations. And in particular one that stricks at their whole Scalement, and has Ordered Processe to be begun against all that disobeyed this illegal Warrant▪ and has treated so great a num­ber of the Bishops as Criminals, only for representing to him the reasons of their not obeying him: If likewise the King is not satisfied to profess his own Religion openly, tho even that is contrary to Law, but has sent Ambassadors to Rome, and received Nuncio's from thence, which is plainly Treason by Law, if likewise many Popish Churches and Chapels have been publickly opened; if several Colledges of jesuits have been set up in divers parts of the Nation, and One of the Order has been made a Privy Counsellour, and a principal Minister of State; and if Papists and even those who turn to that Religion, tho declared Traitors by Law, are brought into all the chief Employments, both Military and Civil; then it is plain, that all the rights of the Church of England, and the whole establishment of the Protestant Religion are struck at, and designed to be overturned: since all these things, as they are notoriously illegal, so they evidently demonstrate, that the great design of them all, is the rooting out this Pestilent Heresie, in their stile, I mean the Protestant Religion.

In the next place, if in the whole course of Justice, it is visible, that their is a constant practiseing upon the Judges, that they are turned out upon their varying from the Intention of the Court, and if Men of not Reputation or Abilities are put in their places; If an Army is kept up [Page 15]in time of Peace, and Men who withdrew from that illegal service are hanged up as Criminals, without any collour of Law, which by con­sequence are so many Murders; And if the souldierie are connived and encouraged in the most enormous Crimes, that so they may be thereby prepared to commit great ones, And from single Rapes and Murders, proceed to a rape upon all our Liberties, and a Destruction of the Na­tion: If I say, all these things are true in Fact, then it is plain, that there is such a Dissolution of the Government made, that there is not any one part of it left Sound and Entire: And if all these things are done now, it is easie to imagine what may be expected, when Arbitrary Power that spares no Man, And Popery that spares no Heretick, are finally established: then we may look for nothing but Gabelles, Tailles, Impo­sitions, Benevolences, and all sorts of Illegal Taxes: As from the o­ther we may expect Burnings, Massacres, and Inquisitions. In what is doing in Scotland we may gather what is to be expected in England; where, if the King has over and over again declared, That he is vested with an Absolute Power, to which all are bound to Obey without Re­serve. And has upon that annulled almost all the Acts of Parliament that passed in K. James l. Minority, tho they were ratified by himself when he came to be of Age; And were confirmed by all the subsequent Kings, not excepting the present. We must them conclude from thence, what is resolved here in England, and what will be put in Execution as soon as it is thought that the times can bear it. When likewise the whole settle­ment of Ireland is shaken, and the Army that was raised, and is main­tained by Taxes, that were given for an Army of English Protestants, to secute them from a new Massacre by the Irish Papists, is now all fil­led with Irish Papists, as well as almost all the other Employments; It is plain, that not only all the British Protestants Inhabiting that island, are in dayly danger of being butchered a second time, but that the Crown of England, is in danger of losing that Island, it being now put wholly into the hands and power of the Native Irish, who as they formerly of­fered themselves up sometimes to the Crown of Spain, sometimes to the Pope, and once to the Duke of Lorrain, so are they prehaps at this pre­sent treating with another Court for the sale and surrender of the Island, and for the Massacre of the English in it.

If thus all the several Branches of our Constitution are dissolved, it might be at least expected, that one part should be left entire, and that is the Regal Dignity; and yet that is prostituted, when we see a Young [Page 16]Child put in the reversion of it, and pretended to be the Prince of Wales, Concerning whose being Born of the Queen, there appears to be not on­ly no certain proofs, but there are all the presumptions that can possib­ly be imagined to the contrary. No proofs were ever given, either to the Princess of Denmark, or to any other Protestant Ladies, in whom we ought to repose any confidence that the Queen was ever with Child; that whole matter being mannaged with so much mysteriousness, that there were violent and publick suspitions of it before the Birth. But the whole contrivance of the Birth, the sending away the Princess of Denmark, the sudden shortning of the Reckoning, the Queens sudden going to St. James's, her no less sudden Delivery, the hurrying the Child into another Room, without shewing it to these present, and without their hearing it cry [...]s And the Mysterious Conduct of all since that time; No satisfaction being given to the Princess of Denmark upon her return from the Bath, nor to any other Protestant Ladies, of the Queens having been really brought to Bed; These are all such evident Indications of a base Im­posture, in this matter, that as the Nation has the justest Reason in the World to doubt of it, so they have all possible reason to be at no quiet, till they see a Legal and Free-Parliament Assembled, which may Impar­tially, and without either Fear or Corruption. Examine that whole matter.

If all these matters are true in Fact, then I suppose no Man will doubt, that the whole Foundations of this Government, and all the most Sacred Parts of it are overturned; And as to the Truth of all these Suppositions, that is left to every English-Mans Judgement and Sense,

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.