THere's two or three Falacies in the very Title of the said Pam­phlet.

1st, In charging what's contain'd there­in upon the Quakers in general, as being their Principles, Doctrines, Laws and Orders, &c. Whereas in truth, divers of them are neither the Quakers Principles, Laws, nor Orders, but disown'd by the said People, though this Nameless Author has unjust­ly represented them, as if they were some Principles all intirely Transcribed, and that from the Quakers in general, without exception, which is a notorious abuse; For 'tis also very Obvious, That many of them are very Partially, unfairly and in­juriously cited, minced, curtalized, Pickt­pach't, and scrap'd up, thereby wronging some former Antient Writings of perti­cular Persons deceased, and not here to [Page 2] answer for themselves (as George Fox, Ed­ward Burroughs, Francis Howgill, John Bur­nyet, William Smith, John Audland, Josiah Cole, and others, and some yet alive abu­sed) Others very falsly represented, being taken on Trust on an Implicit Faith, out of our Long-since Refuted Adversaries Books and Pamphlets.

2dly, That those pretended Principles and Doctrines &c. of the Quakers (at least ma­ny of them) are Rendered to be of danger­ous Consequence; When we can easily make it appear that Many of them, even as cited by this Obscure Accuser, are a­greeable to the holy Scriptures, and Te­stimonies of Holy Men, consequently not of any dangerous Consequence (though in many things the Libeller appears very In­jurious as well as Envious.) Whereupon I enquire.

1. What dangerous Consequence can be in our Knowing or Believing our E­lection (i. e. in Christ) before the World began? pag. 1. Ephes. 1.4.

2. Or what dangerous Consequence in our believing or Testifying that Christ hath given us Discerning and Judgment? Or that we are of God, and they that own God will own us, or any who are his Children?

[Page 3]3. Or in our Believing the Tabernacle of God to be with us, that is with all his People whom we include as of us, or with us, who are not against us (nor Envious, nor exalted in Pride, or Self-conceit) but looking towards the Lord, as in every Nation and People they that truly fear God and work Righteousness, they are accepted, and so far of us.

4. What dangerous Consequence can be in asserting, That Christ's Ministry or Teaching, is to Bring up the Hearers to Perfection, to the measure of stature and fulness of Christ? pag. 2.

5. Can none (Quakers or others) in these Dayes, truly declare that they are or may be moved by the Immediate Spirit and Power of God to Write or Preach without dangerous Consequence? pag. 2, 3.

6. What dangerous Consequence can be in asserting, That they that have the Form and not the Power, and that are not Infalli­ble in their Counsel and Judgment in their Ministry, are none of Christ's Ministers? pag. 3.

7. Is not the Spirit of Christ Infallible, and the Ministry thereof Infallible? And are any Christ's Ministers who have not his Spirit to Instruct them? pag. 3.

[Page 4]8. The distinction between the Letter, and the Word or Spirit, and between the Ministry of the Letter, and that of the Spirit, pag. 3, 4. as between the Shadow and Substance, the meer Writing in out­ward Characters, and the holy divine Do­ctrines and Truths therein contained, (or holy Scriptures as intending the same) Is so Scriptural, that I know no true Christian will deny such distinction, muchless deem it of dangerous Consequence: (We never esteemed or called the Holy Scriptures (that is the Holy Doctrines, or Precepts thereof) but a Dead Letter, &c. This Matter is fully answered and explained in a late Treatise, entituled, Antichrist in Flesh Vn­mask'd; and in many others. But yet further.

Section 8. Touching the Scriptures, implying that we call them the Husk, the Letter which Killeth, Earthly and Carnal Letter, &c.

This is not Justly nor truly stated, and may Cause mistake and Misapprehension, as if the Divine and Christian Doctrine and Testimonies contained in the Scrip­tures were included in the Term Letter, Husk, &c. which could not be the Inten­tion of any of our Friends in that case, but of the meer outward Writings, as in [Page 5] Paper, and Ink, the Shadows and Types, the Legal and outward Ministration as Di­stinguished and Separated from that of the Spirit, Life and Substance, Cor. 3.6, 7. Rom. 2.29. Please also to take G. F's Ex­planation and Sence, that by Letter, he means Paper and Ink, but saith the Scripture the thing it speaks of is Spiritual, the Word is Spirit, Great Mystery, fol. 78. And further he Explains, viz. the Scripture it self without the Spirit that gave it forth, is a dead Letter in it self; the Spirit is it that gave forth the Scriptures; Gr. Mist. fol. 127.

Wherein he distinguisheth between the meer Letter and the holy Scripture, be­tween the Letter and the Doctrine, between the Writings and the Gospel or Word de­clared of, because the one will decay, the other is permanent, the Books and Wri­tings in Ink and Paper will wear out, so will not the Word: Iehoiakim King of Judah could Burn Jeremiah's Roll, or Book writ with Ink by Barach, but not the Word of the Lord, nor the Words thereof; for the same Word caused all the former Words to be Written again after the Roll was burnt, Jer. 36. This is no contempt of the Scripture, no more then it is of the Earth and the Heavens, to say they shall Wax Old and Perish. But the Word that [Page 6] made them, Endureth, Psal. 102.25, 26. Heb 1.11, 12.

Dust, cannot properly be said of the holy Scriptures, or Doctrine; but that the Letter or Writing will decay, and some pervert it; and in setting the Shadow above the Substance, and the Letter above the Spirit, and thinking to have eternal Life therein, will not come to Christ, that they might have Life. The Devil and Serpents have perverted and abused the Scriptures, and turned the Truth thereof into a Lye. But the Truth re­maineth, the Truth is Truth still, and the holy Scripture it self (or Doctrine of Truth therein) cannot be broken.

The Husk, that intends no contempt upon the holy Scripture, but thereby in­tending the meer Letter or Writing, it is not the Kernel, the seed, the Living Word, Spi­rit or Life which the Scriptures testifie of.

Those Repeated Stories and Reflecti­ons insinuated concerning Governments Mo­narchy, Rulers Laws, &c. pag. 4.5, 6, 7. Enviously and perversly Raked up by Patches, Mincings and piece-meal out of old Books, the most part writ in the Common-Wealth's Days, are plainly an­swered, and our Innocency cleared in se­veral late Books, one Intituled, Christ's [Page 7] Lambs defended from Satan's Rage. Ano­ther, Some Reflections on some Remarks upon the said Christ's Lambs defended. Another Intituled, Innocency against Envy. Ano­ther, The Quakers Answer to a scandalous Libel, stiled, A Letter to the Quakers.

All these Printed, and Sold by Thomas Northcot in George-Yard in Lumbard-street, London. So that much more time need not be spent to Answer the Libeller over again in these matters.

As for outward or Civil Governments, our Peaceable and Christian Conversation, as a People, is so well known under all from first, that we need not fear secret Smiters and Libeller's unjust attempts to blast or cloud our Christian Reputation on that account, well knowing that when vve have suffered great wrong, and been sevearly persecuted by any in outvvard Povver for our tender Conscience tovvard God, he vvould be ready to Plead our Inno­cent Cause, as he hath many times done. And as for such Rulers or Persons in outvvard Povver, as have abused their power either by Injustice, Oppression or Persecution, they were all accountable to God, who is no Re­specter of Persons; and for any of his Ser­vants to warn such against their Evil Ways, and of their Destruction or Overthrow, [Page 8] when God requires them; this is so far from any act of Rebellion or Sedition, or unkindness either, that I think such kind of Pious Plainness and Caution seasonably given, is a token of the greatest Kindness can be expressed to the Great Men or Po­tentates of the Earth; though such Friend­ship is rarely well resented or accepted except by such Princes and Rulers whose Hearts are tenderly inclined, as was Da­vid's, Josiah's, Hezekiah's, and such Kings of Judah, &c. as had some tender Fear to­wards God, and regard to his Laws in their Hearts.

I do grant that several among our Friends at first and in the Common-Wealth's, days had no great affection to some sort of Monar­chy, and the more doubtful thereof, be­cause they were Jealous that thereby, such Bishops would be set up again as would renew or cause Persecution upon Consci­entious Dissenters again; For many of them came of Puritanical Families, who had deeply suffered by the former Bi­shops, and their Courts (their Star-Cham­ber, and high Commission Court, &c.) This caused the greater Aversness (in ma­ny heretofore) to such Monarchy thus considered; But what then? is it Just to upbraid us always as a People, and to [Page 9] agravate the same against us as Criminals? Or to render us as disaffected either to Just Government or Monarchy in General without Exception? when as good Kings and Governments we had no reason to dissafect or oppose; and tho' we like not bad ones, who are for Persecution and Oppression, &c. we have always been true and Constant to the Doctrine of Non Re­sistance, and Passive Obedience, ever since we were a People; and learned quietly to submit as Christians to the Over-ruling Hand and Providence of God in the Re­volutions and Change of Governments, (which have Eminently happen'd even in our days) as Samuel did, though he was as much a Republican and averse to Mo­narchy as some called Quakers were at first, as when Israel's Requiring a King, like other Nations displeased Samuel, 1 Sam. chap. 8. Yet when a King was given them, he granted him to be the Lord's Anointed and Chosen, 1 Sam. 10. which is some­thing suitable to the Case of those our former Friends, for whose sakes in this Concern we are by these Apostates impli­citly (yet very unjustly) rendered Ob­noxious to the Civil Government.

[Page 10]Some of the Libeller's false Charges and notorious abusive Perversions.

1. That the Quakers have a Spirit Given them beyond all the Fore-Fathers (since the days of the Apostles in the Apostacy) and they can discern who are Saints, and who are Devils, quoting G. F's Great Mystery, pag. 89. Answ. This is a notorious Perversion, this Parenthesis before being a Forgery, and not in G. F's Answer: The truth of the matter is thus, viz. Magnus Byne said, The Quakers knows a man whether he be a Saint or Devil—and they are beyond all our Fore-Fathers, &c. G. F. answers, viz. ‘Here thou hast shewed that the Quakers have a Spirit Given them beyond all the Fore-Fathers (since the days of the Apostles) in the Apostacy.’ G. F's Parenthesis be­ing Only [Which we do Witness.] His words do not intend nor import a Spirit or Attainment among the Quakers beyond all the Fore-Fathers, true Apostles, and others without exception (as the Libeller makes them look) but beyond all such Fore-Fathers as were in the Apostacy since the days of the true Apostles; And what dangerous Consequence can follow thence, Pray? Can it be of dangerous Conse­quence not to believe a [...]tter Attainment than Apostates had? who th [...] will Credit [Page 11] this Obscure Smiter to be any better than an Old Apostate? And of what validity is his Work then?

Sect. 4. pag. 2. He attempts to prove the Quakers guilty of High Boasting, by accusing G. F. with saying he is the Son of God; I suppose he intended a Son of God; but take it as it is, was not Adam called the Son of God? Luke 3.38. G. F. pre­ferred Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son of God we are sure, and owned himself to be a Servant of Christ (as he truly was, and a Son of God too) in his Work and Service in his day. Christ the only begot­ten Son of God in all things must have the preheminence; though as many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God, and now are we the Sons of God, &c. 1 John 3.2. Again, we are charged with saying, He that hath the same Spirit that raised up Jesus Christ, is Equal with God. For which Saul's Errand, pag. 8. 1654. is quoted, We deny the words as there printed; The words [he that hath] should be left out; and have reason to suppose the mistake has happen'd either in the Printing or Transcribing, (for 'tis very carelessly and badly printed) and that con­trary to G. E's. and our Principle, and to his own very words and confession a little [Page 12] before in the same Book, where being charged with Professing himself to be Equal with God, he possitively denys the Charge but confesses The Father and the Son are One, and that Christ and the Holy Spirit are Equa, with God, pag. 5, 6. and to Christ Jesus both as he was of the Seed of Abraham and also as he was Equal with God (i. e, both to his Manhood and Divinity.)

It's therefore a gross Slander implyed against the Quakers that 'tis their Boasting, Doctrine, or Principle that They or any of them are Equal with God, because they per­take of his Spirit that raised Jesus from the Dead (and of the divine Nature and Image) they pretend to no such Equality or Principle, neither doth G. F. but the contrary he denys it of himself, or any other Creature, as that any Creature should be Equal with the Creator, as in his Great Mystery, fol. 127. And we abhor any such Boasting.

Charge. Sect. 22. Some of the Characters they give to other Ministers that are not of them. This by the way is a notorious falsehood, importing (without excep­tion) that the Quakers in general give the Subsequent Characters to all other Mini­sters that are not of them (here's no ex­ception) this appears an Envious Forgery [Page 13] to sow Discord, and stir up ill will and prejudice in all other Ministers and their Hearers against us, which appears no better than a devilish Design, and a great Abomination to sow Discord among Con­scientious Dissenters and others.

And what Characters do they give to other Ministers, as he pretends, but such as these, viz.

‘The Priests of the world are Thieves and Robbers, Antichrists, Conjurers, Devils, Lyars, a Viporous and Serpen­tine Generation, Babilons▪ Merchants, Whited Walls, and Painted Sepulchres, Ravening Wolves, Greedy Dogs, Am­bitious Pharisees, Hunting after their Prey, never satisfied, raging like So­domites, Quoting a Brief Discovery, Print­ed 1653. with five Names to it.’

But stay, soft a little; 1. Were these Characters given in general, or to all, other Ministers that are not of us, or not in Society with the Quakers (so called?) No sure, they seem to be directed to such Priests of the World then (mark) as were both very Covetous, Proud, and Envious Persecutors, and there were too many such we know right well, and have, many of us deeply suffered by them, many both severe Imprisonment (some till Death) [Page 14] and spoil of Goods; 'tis true to compare such to Vipers, Serpents, Wolves, greedy Dogs, &c. may seem hard Characters and Comparisons, yet they are not unscrip­tural; but their Cruel Usage of many of us, has been far heavier and harder than such Scriptaral Characters, which never were intended to all other Ministers that are not of us; nor to any of them who are men of Moderation, Gentleness and So­briety; therefore the Libeller has shame­fully misrepresented us in this matter. Which is fully Answered in our Treatise, Entituled, The Contemned Quaker and his Christian Religion defended against Envy and Forgery, &c. pag. 55. to pag. 66.

In Sect. 30. under the Title, Hear a few of the Execrations THEY Give, &c. Is in­serted a mistaken prediction against John Story, viz. This Year shalt thou dye. dat. 1. 1. Mon. 1677. Though he lived several Years after. This the Libeller has very unjustly charged (under his general Title and Words THEY Give) on the Quakers, for [They] is falsely made relative to the Quakers without exception, according to his Title, when as the said mistake, was but one man's (i. e. S. E's) and as such condemned, by the Quakers, and in him­self also who committed the Error as to [Page 15] the time. Thus immorally and unjustly has the Libeller dealt by the Quakers, such Injustice, the Common justice, Laws and Custom of England allows not of, even in Criminal Cases; a Fellon after he has answered the Law by undergoing the Condign Punishment thereof, may not afterward be upbraided as being a Thief still, much less may others that are Inno­cent be branded or Reproached for his Fact, but this kind of Injustice we meet withal from Lying Spirits, and malicious Apostates, who regard neither Truth nor Common Justjce in such injurious dealing.

And the like measure we have in Sect. 39▪ about a few inconsistent and indeed un­sound Expressions (or Agreement) al­leadged against the Quakers, dated Decem­ber 23. 1680. about Giving up ones whole Concern (if required) unto the Judgment of the Spirit of God in Mens and Womens Meetings, rather then any perticular Mea­sure in my self, &c.

Our obscure Accuser was not so ingeni­ous nor just here, as to tell the World, that the said Agreement was only of a few in Barbades; nor to tell the Reader the Quakers in England long since disown­ed it, and that those Persons themselves [Page 16] (or most of them) concern'd in it have seene and retracted their own Mistake and Error therein. As in our Paper, entituled, Some Reflections on some Remarks, pag. 6. This account is given, viz.

‘How immoral and unjust is it to up­braid us with a pretended Order from Barbadoes? seeing when it first came over it was disown'd by us, and our Friends in General, especially wherein it imports a Contra-distinction or Divi­sion between the Spirit in a particular Member, and the same Spirit in the Church, or opposing the perticular measure thereof in my self to the Spirit of God in Meetings, which we cannot make Good Sence of, for the same Spi­rit Cannot be divided; And the Judg­ment that rises in the Church of God from the Spirit of Truth in any matter, comes from the same Spirit in perticular Members, before it be received in the general. And we have understood that the aforesaid pretended Order was then disowned by some perticular Friends even in Barbadoes, and afterwards re­voked by them in general, and there­fore not Justly to be made a Charge against them or us.’

[Page 17]Pray do but observe how implacably Envious, Unjust, and Injurious these our secret Smiters and Adversaries are; what Reiterate (and Charge) perticular and per­sonal Revoaked and Exploded Mistakes and Errors upon a People wholly Unconcerned therein? Oh! Horrid Injustice and gross In­jury! If men should deal thus by them after they have paid their Debts, as to recharge them over and over with the same Debts, and never be satisfied, they would conclude at this rate there would be no living one by another. Or if God should deal so by you (our secret Adversaries and Smiters in the dark) as never to forgive nor blot out your Offences, but should always re­member them against you after Repen­tance, Pray what would become of you? What would be your End? But God is both Just and Merciful, tho' you are nei­ther, you bear no resemblance of Him in this your Injustice and Implacableness. However we doubt not but our just and good God will plead our Innocent Cause with you implacably envious Persons and our injurious Enemies and Apostates.

In the 31. Sect. Some nonsence, Long­since writ by S. E. about G. F. and denied by the Quakers, is again not only reitter­rated, but G. Whitehead (i. e. my self) [Page 18] unjustly accused with Excusing the same, for which my hidden Accuser Quotes Serious Search, pag. 58. &c. And also Innocency against Envy, pag. 18. Wherein he has dealt very unfairly and falsly by me, for in neither do I excuse S E's words in that case, but deny them in the first, as unsafe. In the second, as being both Nonsence, and not to be stood by. How did I herein stand by S. E's. words or challenge? What in deeming them unsafe and Nonsence, and not to be stood by? See Serious Search, pag. 58.59. And Innocency against Envy, pag. 18. Which plainly clear me from the accusa­tion before. All impartial Readers may take it for granted that these secret Smiters will make little Conscience of wronging the dead (many whereof being Reproachfully accused in the said Pamphlet) when they can thus wrong the living, as the Libeller has done by me in a case so notorious as this is, by charging me to excuse that which I plainly declare to be Nonsence and not to be stood by; but only excused the intention of the Writter on his own Explanation as de­clared in our Friends Book Judas and the Jews, pag. 75. And not the Nonsence of his words in his challenge, but corrected the incoherence by his own declared intention accordingly, as where he applies [The [Page 19] World was made by him] only to Christ. Innocency &c. pag. 18. Wherein I aimed at nothing but Truth and Justice on all hands, which I prefer to all Personal fame and interests, and through the Lord's goodness have long resolved not to de­cline or conceal Truth to vindicate or excuse Error or mistake in any; Concern­ing the Charge against several Mini­sters of some divine Attributions to G. F. in two Letters pretended, the first said to be from Josiah Cole, in 1658. (above thirty four years ago.) The other from John Audland, and dated from Bristol, 1665. Whereas in Thomas Camm's account, (who was much conversant with John Aud­land in his last Sickness) 'Tis declared (in his Testimony) That J.A. finisht his Course here in the 1st Month, 1663. And the same Account in a late Letter to me, Tho. Camm confirms according to their Regi­ster of Burials, &c. in Westmorland, That John Audland was buried the 24th of the 1st. Month, 1663. being the very last day of that Year, according to the usual beginning of the Year on the 25th of the same; so that John Audland dyed about two Years before the date of the said pretended Letter from him to G. F. How could he then write the Letter (to G. F.) two years after he was dead?

That pretended to be from J. C. our [Page 20] Adversary says, Is vindicated by W. P. and other Chief Quakers in Judas and the Jews. pag. 44.45, 46. Is it so? Yet does he not attempt to refute that Vindication; which tho' it was of the Substance of it only; Supposing the Copy for granted as cited, yet I still question the Copy whe­ther true in all parts as I have done, there­fore shall not undertake to Warrant it in every part [...]clar or word in it, as it has been divers times slung at us, both by F. Bugg, and some Baptists, and yet each ap­parently vary in their own Recital thereof, in their Pamphlets, as F. B. has done in his One Blow more, pag. 7.1691. And in his Battering Rams, pag. 29.1690.91. Wherein tho' I have cause still to Question the Ve­rity and Authority of his Copy, yet cannot find nor see that he can justly infer either Idolatry or Blasphemy on Josiah Cole in parti­cular, muchless against the Quakers in General from any thing as yet reiterated out of his pretended Letter, by—Bugg, Baptists or the Libeller, §. 31.

But further to clear Josiah Cole, and his Friends from their Reproach of Idolatry and Blasphemy (in relation to G. F. or any other Creature) as utterly contrary to his Christian Principle and Profession. We'l have recourse to his own plain Testi­monies [Page 21] on Record, for and in behalf of the same Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the holy Scriptures testifie, in his positively declaring ‘No other Name under Hea­ven to be saved from Sin by, but HIS who preached himself the Light of the World, and who Lighteth every Man that cometh into the World, John 1.9. and against the Pope and Church of Rome and the Pope's Headship, affirm­ing that Christ never ordained a Visible Head to his Church, but that Christ is the Head and Foundation, and that Prophet whom Moses prophecyed of, whom the People are to hear in ALL things, Deut. 18.15. and that Christ is the Go­vernour and Head of the People called Quakers, and their Church. And that Christ is the Word which was in the Beginning with God, Joh. 1.1. And that Christ was the Spiritual Rock which followed Israel, and which they all drunk of, 1 Cor. 104. And that Christ ascend­ed far above all Heavens, that he might fill all things, Ephes. 4.’ Thus far Josiah Cole in the Collection of his Books, pag. 36.60.94.100.105.320, 321, 332. where more at large he magnifies our Blessed Lord Jesus Christ in his divine Being and Offices. Therefore our Adversaries that [Page 22] have reproached him and us on is ac­count with Idolatry and Blasphemy, or wresting Christ's Scepter out of his Hands (as some have done) have very grosly defamed him and others, and shewn their inveterate Malice and Persecuting Anti­christian Spirit, which the righteous Lord will rebuke.

And as for G. F. who was an Eminent Instrument in the Lord's hand for the good of many; he was so far from opposing or denying Christ, or his divine Offices, Dignity, Divinity, (or Blessed Manhood) and so far from accepting or assuming to himself any such Dignity or Hon­our only peculiar, to Jesus Christ, ‘That he did own himself a Servant of our Lord Jesus Christ, and did Preach and Pray in his Name, and to him, and not in his own, as many Thousands can Testifie.’ [These last Lines the Li­beller has very unfairly omitted and concealed in his recital of my words, in his 33. Article against me, pag. 13. out of In­nocency against Envy, pag. 18. Thus it has been the Common Course of our most Envious Adversaries to conceal what ever in our Writings tends most to clear us.] And G. [...]. is more fully Cleared from [...]hese Adversaries Reproach in this matter by his [Page 23] own naked and innocent TESTIMONY of ‘WHAT we believe in behalf of Christ, both as God and Man, (according to the Holy Scriptures) and of His Miraculous Con­ception by the holy Ghost, and being Born of the Virgin Mary, and of his Sufferings, Death, Resurrection and Ascention, &c.’ Printed, 1677. Farther testifying to his Divinity, Great Mystery, fol. 254 ‘That by Christ (the Light) all things were made and created, and that he was Glo­rified with the Father before the world began, Of whom the Scriptures testifies; And that this Christ is the same to day, yesterday and forever, that the Saints came to Witness WITHIN them, Not another Christ, nor many Christs.’ With many more sincere Confessions (to the true and very Christ of God) of the same import, which would fill a Volumn to re­cite; a few whereof being sufficient to clear both G. F. and us from the false and foul imputations of Idolitry and Blasphemy, or de­nying the One true and ever Blessed Lord Je­sus Christ, (of whom the Holy Scriptures Testifie) and from promoteing or adoreing any other Man (or Creature) in Christ's sted, as we have been most unjustly defam­ed, and the Righteous God knows and will plead our Innocency and Clear us in this matter, we doubt not.

[Page 24]And as to that pretended to be John Audland's Letter to G. F. Sect. 32. There's 16. or 17. lines of Mater added in it; more than are (in F. B:'s Coppy One Blow more page 7. Thus confused and varied Transcripts are cast upon us to defame and brand us with Idolitry, &c. without either Produceing us the Original Leters pre­tended to be from I. C. and I. A. or any Credible Authority to prove the verity of their differant Copies, tho' demanded both of Bugg, Baptists and Athenians (so called) since we both questioned their broken Printed Copies, with their dashes — and &c's. And now I still Question the Truth of this as enlarged against John Audland, and we disown it as it is; let the Libeller Produce the Original Letters or sufficient Authority of Credit (and no parties against us) to prove his Copy exactly true in all parts and perti­cles thereof, where there's any stress of the Sence concerned; for the Charge is high, and requires strict proof in all Essen­tial points (as common Law and Justice doth of Indictments in Criminal Cases) otherwise our Adversary's Copy of the said Letter, may be of as much Credit, as that J. A. writ it two Years after he was dead (as before.) Both J. A. and J. C. [Page 25] were well known to many, and still re­membred to be sincere upright hearted Men, fearing God, and eschewing Evil, who truly honoured and preached Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of God, our blessed Lord and Saviour, as their own Testimonies on Record do still plainly Evince; And that John Audland was a man of more Wisdom, and of a more sensible Christian Spirit than to detract from, or lessen the Honour, Glory or Dignity only due and peculiar to Jesus Christ, or to attribute the same to any other, or to pre­fer G. F. or any Man or Creature else (as the Fountain of Life) in Christ's stead, but only as an Instrument in God's hand, for the Turning of many from Darkness to Light, even to Jesus Christ, the true Light, for Life and Salvation: Besides, 'tis no new thing for sincere Christians to praise the Lord God, and to pray to him, and to confess to the Power and Goodness of God in Christ Jesus, the Fountain of Life, even in a Letter or Epistle to a Friend or Friends, as the Martyrs (divers of them) did in their Letters, which if such their Confessions, &c. had been (by their Ad­versaries,) turned and applied to the Per­sons or Friends they writ unto, it had been a very foul abuse and perversion of [Page 26] their Letters and Intentions; and so may this be to defame J. A. and his Friends for his sake, for any thing yet appears to the contrary; His confessions to Jesus Christ as the Fountain of Life and Strength, and to his Power, &c. may possibly be wrongfully turned and attributed to another; If we might see the very Letter it self from J. A. we could say more to it, to manifest and clear the Truth.

To conclude this Point; 1st. I find not that the said Letter is directed and applied by John Audland himself unto G. Fox. 2dly, I do not approve thereof as cited and directed by our Adversaries (with the date of 1665.) unto G. F.

As for John Audland's Christian Prin­ciple and clearness in behalf of Jesus Christ, we have reason Charitably to cre­dit his own Testimonies, rather than Li­bels, or any thing his and our Adversaries enviously suggest, and turn or throw upon him (or us) to defame him and his Chri­stian Reputation. Now they know he is gone, he is not here to answer for him­self, therefore his own Innocent undoubt­ed Testimonies on Record shall speak for him (and his holy Respect and Honour as is only due to the very Christ of God) and against his Enemies. In behalf of Jesus [Page 27] Christ, according to the Holy Scriptures; John Audland thus writes, ‘The Lord our Righteousness (by whose Grace we are saved) hath chosen us in Christ Je­sus, who hath all Power and Authority committed unto him, and upon whose Shoulders the Government is laid, pag. 116.’ Of the Collection of the Books and written Epistles of John Camm and John Audland. And further,

These Passages are (as many more might be) truly Collected out of John Audland's Works and Writings to shew.

1st, That he truly owned and honoured the true Christ, the only begotten Son of God according to the holy Scriptures.

2dly, That therefore no divine Attribu­tations, Confessions, Honour or Worship (only due and peculiar to our Lord Jesus Christ) could he ever intend to any other besides him.

3dly, These of J. A. his Free and Volun­tary Confessions to the very Christ of God, and his Light and Life, &c. are plain Indi­cations of his clearness from the gross and absurd Imputations of Idolatry and Blasphe­my wickedly Insinuated by his and our Ad­versaries.

4thly, And how easily may such Apo­state Adversaries wrong the Dead, when they make no Conscience to wrong the Living, as they have done in plain matter of Fact? and what Credit then can their Scandalous Pamphlets, or their Envious and defaming Suggestions and Reproaches [Page 30] (many whereof are omitted here) be of, to any impartial Readers, or Persons in­different?

There are divers of those other Articles exhibited by the said Libeller in the said Pamphlet (which are truly cited, and own­ed by us) which I need not vindicate, until the Libeller come forth, and make his Ob­jections, and own his said Pamphlet, stiled, Some of the Quakers Principles, &c. and sub­scribe his Name thereunto.