I. HISTORICAL BOOKS.
THE HISTORICAL BOOKS of the New Testament are such a [...] containe principally matters of Fact, though matters of Faith and Doctrine are also interwoven. The Histories of the New Testament, are I. Of Christ the head of the Church. II. Of the Church of Christ, his body.
The HISTORY OF JESUS I CHRIST himselfe is contained in the Foure Evangelists, wherein Christs Genealogy, Nativity, Life, Doctrine, Miracles, Death, Resurrection and Ascension, are described. Matthew, Mark, Luke and Iohn, are usually called by way of emphasis, The foure Evangelists, because they alone wrote the Evangelicall History of Iesus Christ. Matthew and Iohn were Apostles Matth. 10.23. Mark 3.18, 19. Mark and Luke were (though not Apostles, yet) holy Apostolicall men, the Apostles disciples, Companions and assistants in the work of the Ministry.
The generall and common Scope [Page 142] of these foure Histories, and of the writing of them is that which Iohn expresseth in particular, viz. That we might believe that Iesus is the Christ, the sonne of God; and that beleeving we might have life through his name, John 20.31. Particular ends, and occasions may be noted in the particular considerations of them.
This one History of Iesus Christ, is written by foure severall Penmen. The Reasons thereof are worthy to be inquired into.
Ancient writers (who much please themselves with the mysteriousnesse of Numbers) have excogitated divers; Some fetch a Reason from the foure Rivers of Paradise. Origen. Some, from the foure rings of the Ark wherein the the Tables of the law were contained, Hieronym. Some from the foure chief, Cardinall winds Iraen. Advers. Haeres. l. 3. c. 11. Some thinke that the Gospel being to be dispersed to the whole world, the world being divided into foure chiefe parts, therefore there were foure-Evangelists, and hence this History of Christ, written by foure Evangelists, [Page 143] is called Sancta Quadriga Domini i. e. The Lords chariot drawn of foure, wherein Christ rides as in triumph throughout the world, to spread abroad the sweet odour of his knowledge, &c. D. Aurel. Augustin. de consensu. Evangelistarum, lib. 1. c. 5, 6, 7. Tom. 4. August. Expos. in Evang. Ioan. Tract. 36. Iraen. quo supra Most accommodate that of the four Haec autem animalia tria, sive leo, sive homo, sive vitulus in terra gradiuntur: unde isti tres Evangelistae in his maximè occupati sunt, quae Christus in carne operatus, & quae precepta mortalis vitae exercendae carnem▪ portantibus tradidit. At vero Joannes super nubila infirmitat [...]s Humanae velut Aquila volat, & lucem incommutabilis veritatis acutissimis atque firmissimis o [...]ulis cordit in [...]u [...] tur. Aug. de consens. Evang [...] de 1. c. 6. Tom. 4. living creatures, Ezek▪ 1.5. and Rev. 4.6. to the number of the Evangelists, but severally. Ambrose gives, the Man to Matthew, who begins with Christs pedigree; The Lyon to Mark, who begins his History of the Lyon-like ministry of Iohn Baptist, that Evangelicall Elias, Christs immediate forerunner; The Calfe to Luke, who begins▪ his Gospel with the Nativity of Christ, and that in a stable, there being no room for him in the Inne; and the Eagle to Iohn, who in the beginning of his Gospel soares aloft to that high mystery of Christs Divinity and Godhead, D. Ambros. Praefat. in Evang. secund. Luc. But leave we these notions of wit, which seem rather to be similitudes, allusions, or Allegories, used for illustration, rather then [Page 144] Arguments for demonstration, why these foure should write our blessed Saviours History.
We may rather conceive Christs History was written by these foure.
- 1. Because God, who appointed many witnesses of Christs doctrine and works, &c. not only to Ierusalem, all Iudea, and Samaria, but to the utmost parts of the earth, Act. 1.8. & 10.39, 41, 24. did peculiarly stirre up these foure persons by his spirit to this work; for holy men writ who were moved, and as moved by the Holy Ghost, 2 Pet. 1.20, 21.
- 2. This History of Christ, is the History of Histories, of greatest worth in it selfe, and concernement to us: and likely to be most opposed by the Devil, & the wicked world, &c. therfore God (that requires two or three witnesses, for confirmation of things, Deut. 17. 6. Heb. 10.28.) makes use of foure witnesses to write Christs story, that by the writings of foure, every thing might he established, beyond suspition.
- 3. That we may see the authority of the Gospel, depends not upon the Penmen thereof, but upon the Holy Ghost [Page 145] that indites it, and therefore this History is written, not only by Matthew and Iohn, Apostles, who were eye and earewitnesses of what Christ did and spake; but also by Mark and Luke the Apostles followers, who stedfastly believed the Apostles report, Luk. 1.1, 2. though not [...] eye-witnesses themselves, yet were incited thereto by the spirit.
- 4. That this Gospel-History might be compleated, one explaining what another left obscure, for matter or order, one supplying what another had omitted, As, Matthew, who wrote first, (as Pareus thinks Proem. in Matth. p. 599.) viz. in the ninth yeare after Christs ascension, for the most part relates the things done, but seldome insists upon the order of doing them. Mark who wrote next, viz. in the tenth yeare after Christs ascension, briefly relates what Matthew did more largely, (Mark being as an Abstract, or Epitome of Matthew,) but withall he more insists upon the ordering and timing of things done. Luke, who wrote in the fifteenth year, after Christs ascension, having seen others writings, propounds to himselfe [Page 146] to write of things from the very first, and that methodically; It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of things, from the very first, to write unto thee in Order, Luke 1.3. In many things he shews the order of things by circumstances, and in most agrees with Mark, whence Tertullian cals Lukes Gospel, Digestum Historiae Evangelicae, i. e. An orderly digesting of the Evangelicall Story: but sometimes things manifest in Matthew and Mark, he puts not in their own place. Iohn who wrote his Gospel in the two and thirtieth yeare after Christs ascension, professedly, (as Eusebius in hist. Eccles. testifies) addes the Acts of Christ in the first yeare of his Ministry, omitted by the rest. And in the rest of his History, he not only insists much upon Christs doctrine not formerly spoken to, but also expressely notes the Feasts of certaine distinct years, incident in the time of Christs ministry, intimating that the Evangelicall History penned by others, should be distributed into certain years, according to those Feasts.
- 5. Finally, though the Holy Ghost [Page 147] could by one and the same contexture of words, have given us the History of Christs words and deeds, (as Gerson noteth) yet not without some great mystery therein, he pleased, sub quadam concordissima, (si it a dicipossit) dissonantia —i. e. under a certain Harmonious & most concording dissonancy, (if we may so speake) to excite the mindes of the faithfull, to the more humble and vigilant investigation of the truth; that so it might appear, the foure Evangelists) did not speak by mutuall Conspiration, but by divine Inspiration.
Matthew.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MATTHEW. The English word [Gospel] comes from the old Saxon word, [Godspel] i. e. Good speech ▪ The Greek word signifies Good-tydings, or a Good-Message: This word Gospel in New Testament, is of severall acceptations. It is used.
- [Page 148]1. In bad sense for a false pretended Gospel, Gal. 1.6, 7.
- 2. In good sense and that either
- 1. Properly, and so the word is used, either
- 1. Generally, For the Doctrine or Promise of salvation freely by Christ to all that will believe. Thus the Gospel is everlasting, Rev. 14.6. one and the same under Old and New Testament, Gal. 3.8.
- 2. Specially, for the Doctrine of grace in accomplishing the Promise by Christ exhibited, this is peculiar to the New Testament Rom. 1.1.2. 2 Cor. 4.4.
- 2. Metonymically.
- 1. For the Preaching, or Ministery of the Gospel, 1 Cor. 9.12.14.
- 2. For the History of Christ, who is the prime Subject of the Gospel. Thus the Books of the four Evangelists are called Gospells.
This Book is called The Gospel according to Mat. because he was Penman of it. Matthew, an Hebr. name, in Syriack [...] Mattha, some derive it from [...] Mas. i. e. Tribute, others from [...] Mathach, i. e. to extend, to explaine, &c. [Page 149] So that Matthew should sound as much as, An explainer, viz. of Scripture. But rather it is to be deriv'd from [...] Nathan i. e. he hath given or bestowed, whence [...] Matthan, A gift; so Matthew no [...]es a Gift, viz. of God, vid. Greg. Gregori Lexicon sanctum, Sect. 858. p. 641. Matthew was also surnamed Levi, in Hebr. i. e. associated, Mark. 2.14. Luk. 5.29. so he had two names. He was the sonne of Alpheus Mark. 2.14. By profession a publicane, sitting at the Receipt of Custome, Luk. 5.27. Mark. 2.14. with Matth. 9.9. his calling was very infamous among the Jews, yet Christ cals him from the Receipt of custome, to be a disciple, who presently obeyed, and made Christ a great feast, Luk. 5.27, 28.29. Mark 2.14, 15. Matth. 9.9, 10. He was one of the twelve Apostles. Matth. 10.3. Penman of this book, Authority whereof was never questioned by the Church of Christ. He is called, A most faithfull Commentator of the Gospel, by Tertul. lib. de carne Christi, c. 22. p. 310. edit Franeher, 1597. He preached the Gospel to sinners, not only by word, but by exemplary correcting [Page 150] his own life▪ Chrysost. in Praesat. oper. imperfect.
Matthew wrote his Gospel as some think in the one and twentieth yeare after Christs ascension, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. Or the fifteenth yeare, As Nicephorus l. 2. c. 45. Or the ninth yeare after Christs ascension, as Pareus Proem. in Matth. p. 599. and Alsted in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. p. 710
Occasion of Matthews Gospel, some declare thus. Matthew after he had first preached to the Hebrews, and thence was to go to the Gentiles, he committed his Gospel to writing; that so he might supply and compensate his absence by his writing, left behind with them, Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3, c. 24. and out of him Nicephorus l. 2. c. 45
The language, in which Matthew wrote, some thinke was Hebrew; tha [...] he being an Hebrew, wrote in Hebrew to the Hebrews, divers Ancient writers embrace this opinion, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. Athan [...]s. in Synops. p. 141. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 24. Nazianz. in Carm. Hieron. Praefat. in 4. Evang. ad Damas. & in c. 11. Hoseae. August de consens▪ [Page 151] Evang. l. 1. c. 2. Nicephor. l. 4. c. 32. And that it was translated into Greek, By Iohn the Evangelist, as some; By Iames, as o [...]hers; By Luke and Paul, as others; By Mark, as o [...]hers are of opinion. Some thinke he wrote not in pure Hebrew, but in Syriack, being the Dialect then most commonly used, Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. But others Judge, Matthew wrote not his Gospel originally in Hebrew, but in Greek, and that upon these grounds▪ 1. The Hebrew Gospel of Munsterus his Edition is such for language, as it is improbable it should be written by Matthew, or any other skilfull in the Hebrew tongue. 2. The same Authors who report Matthew, to have writ in Hebrew, acknowledge the Greek Gospel of Matthew in the Apostles times, to be commended to the Church as Authentick. Iren. l. 3. c. 39. Hieron. in Catal. illustr. Euseb. l. 3. c. 34. and 39. and l. 5. c. 10. &c. 3. The other Apostles originally wrote in the Greek tongue, (as then most common) and that not only promiscuously to all both Jewes and Gentiles, but peculiarly [Page 152] when they wrote to the Iewes. As Author of the Epistle to Hebrews, Peter, Iames. And their Apostolicall function required them to write in the most knowne tongue, as most to edifying. 4. Matthew's stile plainly agrees with Mark's, differs not much from Iohn's, and though therein there be some Hebraismes, so there are in most books of the New Testament ▪ 5. Matthew interprets Hebrew names by Greek, therefore he wrote in Greek not in Hebrew, e. g. Immanuel Matth. 1.23. Golgotha, Matth. 27.33. Eli Eli lamasabachtani, Matth. 27.46. 6. None can certainly tell who should be the Author of the Greek version, if Matthew wrote in Hebrew. And this opinion tends to destroy the credit and authority of Matthew's Gospel in Greek.
Stope, To evidence to all, but especially to the beleeving Hebrews, with whom he had preached, that this Iesus Christ, was the true Messiah; the true promised seed of David and Abraham, Matth. 1.1.
Principall parts. This History describes.
- [Page 153]I. Christs Birth, and there, His Genealogy, Conception, Nativity, Place where, and some Consequents thereupon, c. 1.2.
- II. Christs Life, wherein are deciphered,
- 1. The things done in reference to Christs threefold office. viz. I. Priestly; His inauguration by Iohns publike promulgation, c. 3. II. Kingly, he combates with Sathan and conquers him, c. 4. III. Propheticall, which he executed. 1. Alone by himselfe, and that either, As a Prophet only, teaching, 1 The Causes of Godlinesse, c. 5. 2 The Duties of Godlinesse, c. 6. 3 The impediments unto Godlinesse, c. 7. As a Prophet and King joyntly, doing miracles, c. 8. and 9. 2. Together with, or by his Apostles in their mjnistry, c. 10.
- 2. The authority and esteem that Christ had. 1. With his owne, c. 11. 2. With others, both 1 Ecclesiasticall Persons who conferred with him, that they might ensna [...]e him and accuse him, c. 12. 2 And Politicall, whether with the people, who flocked no heare him preach. c. 13. Or with the Magistrate, Herods opinion of him, c. 14.
- III. Christs death. Set forth by the Antecedents, Manner, and Consequents of it.
- I. By the Antecedents of it, comprised in his journey to Ierusalem, wherein no [...]e,
- [Page 154]1. Whence he went, the terme from which, viz. From Galilee, c. 15. compared with c. 19. 1. while Christ was in Galilee. 1. He answers the Pharisees and Sadduces about a signe, c. 16. 2. He is transfigured to encourage both himselfe and his Apostles against his passion, c. 17. 3. He preacheth humility and love to his disciples, c. 18.
- 2. What way he went, viz. through the coasts of Iudea, where are recorded his words and deeds, c. 19. and 20.
- 3. Whither he went, the terme to which, viz. To Ierusalem. Here are declared, 1. How he was entertained at Ierusalem, c. 21. 2. What he did there, viz. He disputed with Sadduces and Pharisees, c. 22. Accused the Pharisees of Hypocrisy, &c. c. 23. Foretold Ierusalems destruction, and the signes of his comming to Judgement, c. 24. Admonisheth all to prepare for the last judgement, and describeth it. c. 25.
- II. By the manner of his death, where note 1. The Preface, or Harbenger of it, his Agony in the Garden, Iudas his Treachery, &c. c. 26. 2. The Progresse made to bring him to his end, both in the Ecclesiasticall and Civil consistory. c. 27. 3. The Consummation of his passion, c. 27.
- III. By the Consequents of his death, c. 28.
Mark.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MARK. So denominated from Mark the Penman of it.
MARK, some derive from the Hebr. [...] Marak. i. e. He hath polished, &c. As Hebrewes. Others rather take it to be a Latine name (made a Denizon in the Greek tongue) and derived from the moneth of March, because Mark was borne in that moneth, it being usuall so to denominate men that were born in March, Probus. He was also called Iohn Act. 12.12. & 15.37. viz. Iohn Mark. His Father seemes not to be mentioned in Scripture. His mother was that Mary in whose house they were praying for Peter, when Peter brought out of prison by the Angel, came and knockt at the doore, Act. 12.12. He was cousin to Barnabas, his Sisters Son, Col. 4.10. Though he was not an Apostle, yet he was an Apostolicall man. Some think he was one of the 70 Disciples. Hieronym ▪ [Page 156] If so, he both heard and saw Christ. However he was the follower of Paul and Barnabas, Act. 12.25. And they had him to their Minister, Act. 13.5. Afterwards when there arose a sharp controversie betwixt Paul and Barnabas about Mark; Paul and Barnabas departed a sunder, and Barnabas took Mark along with him to Cyprus, Act. 15.37, 38, 39. And after this (as some thinke) Mark lived with Peter, who cals him Marcus my sonne, 1 Pet. 5.13. From whose mouth he wrote the Gospel, as some think, yet others are of opinion, there were two Marks, Vid▪ Iacob. Laurent. in 1 Pet. 5.13. Irenaeus stiles him The Disciple and interpreter of Peter. Iraen. advers. Heraes. l. 3. c. 1. p. 229. edit. Colon. 1596.
Mark wrote his Gospel two yeares after Matthew, as some think, vid. Annotat. in Irenaeum quo supr. p. 229.230. And he wrote it upon occasion of the request of some Brethren at Rome, as some conceive. Epiphan Haeres. 51. Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 6. c. 11. & l. 1. c. 15. Niceph. lib. 2. c. 15. Hieron. Catal. illust. That conceit of Baronius that he [Page 157] wrote his Gospel in Latin, is rejected as groundlesse. Gerh. loc. com. de Sac. Script. exeg. c. 9. §. 244.
Scope; To describe the true Christ, and to prove that Iesus is the Christ. And this he doth compendiously, as Matthew had done before more Copiously. He also notes the Series and Order of the History.
Principall parts. An Historicall Narration of Christs life, and death is orderly and compendiously laid down;
- I. Christs life and conversation is described,
- 1. By his fore-runner Iohn Baptist, c. 1.
- 2. By things done by Iesus Christ, either,
- 1. Before his transfiguration; as the Oracles which he preached, and the Miracles which he wrought; The splendour and glory of both which are much augmented, both by men, and by God. I. By men, and those both Christs friends, and Christs Foes, 1. Christs friends, as By Matthewes calling to the Apostleship, c. 2. By the 12 Apostles being sent forth to preach, c. 3. By the peoples flocking together to heare Christs Doctrine, c. 4.5. 2. [Page 158] Christs foes, viz, By Christs own Country-men that despised him, c. 6. By the Scribes and Pharisees, cavilling at him and his Disciples, c. 7.8. II. By God, in his trans-figuration, c. 9.
- 2. In his Trans-figuration, c. 9.
- 3. After his trans-figuration, where we have Christs acts.
- 1. Before his entring into the Holy City, c. 10.
- 2. At his entring into Ierusalem, c. 11.
- 3. After his entrance, his 1. Disputation with the Scribes, Pharises, Sadduces, Herodians. c. 12. 2. Predictions of Ierusalem's destruction, and the end of the world, c. 13.
- II, Christs Passion and Death, is set forth,
- 1. By the Antecedents of it, c. 14.
- 2. By the manner of it, c. 15,
- 3. By the Consequents of it. His Buriall, Resurrection, Ascension, &c. c. 15.16.
Luke.
THe Gospel according to LUKE. So denominated from Luke the Penman of it,
[Page 159]LUKE some account an Hebrew name [...] Lokam, i. e. To him the Resurrection; Theophilact thinkes, that Luke and Cleophas first met Christ after his Resurrection. But this is lesse probable, because Luke testifies, that he wrote this History of Christ, according as things were delivered to him by Ministers of the word, that were eye-witnesses—Luke 1.1.2. Others rather count Luke a Latin name from Lucius. Lucius derived a Luce Oriente, i. e. from the morning light, they were wont to impose this name upon such as were borne in the morning, about Sun-rising, &c. He was of Antioch in Syria, as Hieronym. and Theophylact. By particular vocation, a Physician, Luke the beloved Physition, Col. 4.14. And some think he was a most excellent Painter. Niceph. l. 6. c. 16. & l. 15. c. 14. He was a faithfull and constant companion of Paul, 2 Tim. 4.11. His fellow labourer, Philem. 24. And some think Luke is intended by that brother whose praise is in the Gospel throughout all the Churches, 2 Cor. 8.18. Bez. in loc. intimates this was Hierom's opinion. Though Chrysostome [Page 160] rather thinks it was Barnabas, to whom Calvin subscribes, Calv. in loc. Piscat in loc. Luke was an inseparable Companion of Paul and his fellow-worker in the Gospel; saith Irenalis l. 3. c. 14. Pauls follower; and though not an Apostle, yet Apostolicall; saith Tertull. advers. Marcion. l. 4. c. 2. That Luke was most skilfull in the Greek tongue, not onely Hieronym. in Isaiah c. 6. testifies; but also his very stile cleerly evidenceth. Whereupon one saith, It is known to the learned, that Luke observed a more pure Hellenisme then the rest of the Evangelists, Causab. Exerc. 2. c. 1. Paul converted Luke at The [...]es, think Hieronym. Eusebius ▪ and Niceporus. Luke lived a single life, and taught first in France, Italy, Macedonia, and Dalmatia; thinks Epiphan. His death is variously reported; he lived 84 yeares saith Hieron. in Catal. and then dyed in Bithynia. Hicrony. in Catal. At Ephesus, thinks Dorotheus. He was hanged on a fruitfull Olive-tree; thinks Nicephorus.
He wrote his Gospel about fifteene yeeres after Christs Ascension Niceph. and that in the parts of Achaiah, Hieronym.
[Page 161] Occasion of his writing, some say was the appointment of Peter or Paul, that's doubtfull. Probably the request of Theophilus (supposed to be some eminent Senator) to whom he directs both his Gospel, and the Acts. Though some take this name Theophilus, for any go [...]ly man, Lover of God. Luke himselfe cleerely sets down one occasion, viz. The unsuccessefull attempts of many who wrote false Gospels, Luke 1.1.2.
Scope, Besides the generall ayme of all the Evangelists, Luke seemes particularly to intend to supply what others had omitted, and to record thing [...] from the very first, and that methodically in order; that Theophilus might know the certainty of things wherein he had been instructed, Luke 1.3, 4.
Principall parts. In Lukes Evangelical History, are,
- I. The Preface to the whole History c. 1. v. 1, 2, 3, 4.
- II. The Body of the History it selfe, which containes a Narration of,
- I. Christs life, Private or publique.
- 1. Private where 1. Of things before his Nativitie, and of his conception, c. 1. [Page 162] 2. Of his Nativity it selfe, and his education, c. 2.
- 2. Publique in the Ministery of the Gospel, where are, I. His instalment into his publique Ministry, c. 3. II. His executing of his Ministry. 1. By himselfe alone, both in teaching, c. 4. and in acting, c. 5. 2. By his Disciples also, which Disciples are either, Primary, the 12 Apostles called and instructed, c. 6, 7, 8. And sent forth, [...]. 9. Or secondary, as the 70 Disciples sent to preach, c. 10.
- II. Christs Death is described.
- 1. By the Antecedents of it, viz. Christs words and workes in his journey to Hierusalem; here are considerable,
- 1. The terme from which Christ went, from Galile c. 9. v. 51.
- 2. His passage it selfe, wherein Christ discoursed of Gods worship and service, inward, and outward.
- 1. Inward, as 1. Prayer, c. 11. 2. Faith, c. 12. 3. Repentance, whereof are laid down, The Motives c. 13. The impediments, c. 14. The effects or fruits, c. 15.
- 2. Outward, viz. 1. Of eschewing evil, i. e. The abuse of riches c. 16. And scandall c. 17. 2. Of doing good duties, c. 18.
- 3. The terme to which he came, viz. [Page 163] to Ierusalem, where of his 1. Entertainment c. 19. 2. Disputation, c. 20. 3. Prophecy c 21.
- 2, By the manner of it. Beginning of his Passion, c. 22. Progresse c. 23. Period, c. 23.
- 3. By the consequents of his death, c. 24.
John.
THe Gospel according to JOHN. This book is thus intituled from the Penman of it, viz. Not Iohn the Baptist (as he is surnamed Luke 1.63.) Nor Iohn surnamed Marke, Act. 15.37. but Iohn the Apostle, compare Matth. 10.2. with John 21.20, 24. This is the Disciple which testifyeth of these things, and wrote these things. He wrote also three Epistles; and the Revelation in Patmos. JOHN is Originally an Hebrew name, viz. [...] Iochanan. 1 Chron 12.22. Ierem. 40.13. it is also sometimes written [...] I [...]hochanan, as in 1 Chron. 26.3. It is compounded of [...] Iehovah, the proper and essentiall name of God, and [...] [Page 164] chanan i. e. He hath been gracious; whence comes [...] chen i. e. Grace; so that IOHN imports, THE LORD HATH BEEN GRACIOUS; or, THE GRACE OF THE LORD. This Iohn was the sonne of Zebedee, and brother of Iames, all of them Fishermen by trade: Matth. 4.21. and 10.2. Mark 1.19. Luke 5.10. Salome (mentioned Mark 15 40. and 16.1.) is supposed to be Iohn's mother. As Iohn was with his Father, and Brother in the Ship, mending their nets, Jesus called him and his Brother, Matth. 4.21. Luke 5.10. It is thought that Iohn lived a single life: yet some are of opinion that Iohn was the Bridegroome at Cana in Galilie. Ioh. 2.1.9. It is certain; that Iohn was one1 of the three whom Christ took up with him to mount Tabor to behold his trans-figuration, Matth. 17.1. &c. Mark 9.2. Luke 9.28. &c. And z one of the two, whom Christ sent to prepare his last Passeover, Luke 22.8. And 3 that Disciple whom Iesus peculiarly loved above all the rest, Ioh. 13.23. and 19.26. and 20.2, & 21.7.20. 4 Who leaned on Iesus breast at supper; and 5 to [Page 165] whom Christ by a private token discovered that Iudas should betray him, Ioh. 13.23, 24, 25, 26. And 6 to whom Christ dying on the Crosse, commenced his own mother, Ioh. 19.25, 26, 27. After Christs Ascension, Iohn, with Peter, healed miraculously the lame man as they were going into the Temple, Act. 3.3, 4, &c. Preached boldly against all prohibitions, Act. 4.13, 19. Was sent to Samaria having received the word, from the Apostles at Ierusalem, Acts 8.14. Tertullian saith, that the Apostle Iohn, after he in Rome had been cast into burning Oyle, and suffered nothing thereby, was banished into an Iland Tertul. lib. de Praescriptione adversus Haereticos cap. XXXVI. p. 211 edit. Franeker. 1597. Nero slung him into the burning Oyle, as is thought: Domitian Banished him into the Isle Patmos Rev. 1.9, 10. Whence its supposed, he returned under Nerva; came to Ephesus in the 97 yeere of his age, where he lived and taught till he was 99. He made his Sepulcher with his own hands. Left his Disciples, Papias at Ierusalem; Policarpus at Smyrna; and Ignatius at Antioch. [Page 166] He is supposed to write his Gospel towards the end of his life. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. Iohn's Gospel hath still been had of most high account with Antiquity. See Basil. in Homil. sub Princ. Ioan. Chrysost in Prolog. Comment. super Ioan▪ Ambros. l. 3. de sacram. c. 2. Cyrill in Prolog. Ioan. Hieronym. Proem. Comment. in Matth. August. de Civit. dei. l. 10. c. 29. and Tract. 56. in Ioan.
Occasion of Iohn's writing his Gospel, Ecclesiasticall Writers tels us was twofold. viz. 1. To oppose and confute the blasphemous heresies of Ebion and Cerinthus, who denyed the Divinity of Christ; hence Iohn so clearly asserts it, Iohn. 1. See Iren. Advers. haeres. l. 3. c. 11. p. 257. edit. Colon. 1596. Hieronym, in Proem. Comment. in Matth. 2. To supply what the other three Evangelists had omitted, who principally relate things done by Christ, but for one yeare wherein Christ suffered, after Iohn was cast into prison, Euseb. Hist l. 6. c. 13. ex Clem. Alexandr.
Scope of Iohn's writing is expressely noted, Iohn 20.31. These are written [Page 167] that yee might believe that Iesus is the Christ, the sonne of God, and that believing yee might have life through his name.
The Principall parts, or Generall Branches of this Hist. are,
- I. A Description of Christs Person according to his divine and humane nature, c. 1.
- II. A Delineation of Christs office, discharged by him in his foure ominent journeys to Ierusalem, viz.
- 1. At the feast of the Passeover, John 2.12, 13. Here are considerable 1. The terme whence he went, from Cana of Galilee, c. 2. 2. His abode there, the doctrine that he preached, and the Acts he did, c. 2.14. &c. and [...] 3, and 4.1, 2, 3. 3. His returne from Ierusalem through Samaria, and his deeds and act [...] there, c. 4.
- 2. At the feast of Pentecost ▪ wherein 1. He cured him that had the palsie thirty eight years, c. 5. 2. He fed the multitude aboue five thousand with five loaves and two fishes, and preached himselfe the true Mannah, c 6.
- 3. At the feast of Tabernacles, where are 1. Christs comming to Ierusalem, c. 7, 1. to 15. 2. His abode there; during which, he taught, c. 7, 14. to the end. He disputed, c. 8. He cured the man [Page 168] borne blinde, c. 9. He preached himselfe, the true shepheard of his sheep, c. 10. 3. His returne thence beyond Iordan, c. 10.40. &c, whence he came againe into Iudea to Bethany, to raise Lazarus from the dead, c. 11.
- 4. At the Celebration of the true Passeover, when Christ our Passeover was sacrificed for us. Where Christs death is described by the Antecedents, Manner, and Consequents of it.
- 1. By the Antecedents going before his death, viz. 1. His actions, entring into the City, c. 12. Washing his disciples feet at supper, c. 13. 2. His words spoken, either At supper, c. 13, 31. to the end, and c. 14. as they were going to the garden of Gethsemane, 1 Warning his disciples of the worlds persecution, c. 15. 2 Comforting them against the Crosse, c. 16. 3 Praying for them and all his Elect, c. 17.
- 2. By the manner of his Passion, 1. In the garden, c. 18, 1. to 15. 2. In the High-Priests palace, c. 18, 15. to 28. 3. In the Hall of judgement before Pilate, c. 18, 28. to c. 19. v. 17. 4. In the place of execution, c. 19. ver. 17. to the end.
- 3. By the Consequents of his Passion, viz. Christs appearing after his Resurrection, [Page 169] 1. To Mary Magdalene and the disciples in Iudea, c. 20. 2. To the disciples fishing in Galilee, c. 21.
The Acts:
THE HISTORY OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST, his body, and that in the purest Primitive Apostolicall times, is contained in the Acts OF THE HOLY APOSTLES. So denominated from the principall subject matter of this Book, viz. The Acts of the Apostles in the infancy of the Primitive Church, therein recorded Historically.
Penman of this History was Luke the beloved Physitian, who also wrote the Gospel (of whom see what is there spoken) as appears 1. By the Preface or Introduction here prefixed, wherein he mentions the former Treatise of the Gospel penned by him; names Theophilus to whom he directed particularly [Page 170] this History of the Apostles, as well as that History of Christ; and also he connects or knits this Book to his Gospel, by continuing the History where he formerly left. viz. At the Resurrection and Ascension of Iesus Christ, which here is somewhat more fully described, and what followed thereupon, Act. 1.1, 2. So that his Gospel, and the Acts of the Apostles are but as one continued History. 2. By the very stile, which seems notably to indigitate Luke unto us, partly it being compleat and polished Greek becomming Luke an accurate Grecian, who had also most diligently perused the Septuagint version; partly it being replenished with Hebraismes, suitable to Luke's native Genius, being by country a Syrian of Antioch, (the Syrian language being one of the Hebrew dialects) partly because herein somtimes is the Language of a Physitian, very agreeable to Lukes profession, as Act. 17.16. His spirit was stirred in him. [...] i. e. His spirit was in a Paroxysme; the word is used by Physitians to signifie a sharp fit of an ague, fever, &c. & again, the Contention was so sharp, [...] [Page 171] i. e. there befell a Paroxysme, —this word is not used in all the New Testament by any, but Luke, and Paul, (whose companion Luke was) 1 Cor. 13.5. Heb. 10.24. 3. By the consent of ancient and moderne writers. No doubt this Book was written by Luke of Antioch, the Physitian, Hieron in Praefa [...]. Act. Luke the follower of the Apopostle and companion of all his Travell, wrote the Gospel, — and put forth also another excellent volume entituled the Acts of the Apostles. Hieronym. de vir illustr. And againe, the Acts, of the Apostles seem to import a bare history of the infancy of the new-born Christ, but if we know Luke the Physi [...]ian to be the penman of them, whose praise is in the Gospel, we shall consider also that all his words are a medicine for a languishing soule. Hieron. praefat. in Act. and out of him Beda, [...] i. e. The book of the Acts which Luke wrote. Oecumen. in Scholiis. None but the unlearned and unskilfull, can doubt whether Luke were Penman of the Acts, &c. Erasmus.
Occasion. It is thought that Luke [Page 172] wrote this History at Rome, during Pauls imprisonment there. Hieron. de vir illustr. And that at the request of the faithfull brethren at Rome: and by the command of Paul, Dorotheus and Nicephor. Hist. l. 2. c. 43. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. The time of writing is referred to the sixtieth year of Christ, the fourth of Nero, 27th. after Pauls conversion. But the peculiar guidance of the Holy Ghost, was the principall cause of Lukes writing both this and the former Book.
Scope. To describe unto us the Rise, Growth, State and practice of the Primitive Christian Church in her infancy, in the purest Apostolicall times, how she observed and obeyed Christs Commandements to his Apostles, after his Resurrection and before his Ascension, speaking to them of the things pertaining to the Kingdome of God, Acts 1.2, 3. and this both in matters of faith, worship, Church-Communion, and Church-Government; that herein the Primitive Church might be an exemplary Patterne to the following Churches in all succeeding ages. So that this is a most usefull Book to the Church of God.
[Page 173] Principall branches. The Acts of the Apostles, are laid down in this History,
- 1. More generally. The Acts of all the Apostles.
- I. After Christs Resurrection, till his Ascension, c. 1, 1. to 12.
- II. After Christs Ascension till the feast of Pentecost. viz. Their devotion, and their Election of Matthias to the Apostleship in room of Iudas, c. 1, 12. to the end.
- III. At the feast of Pentecost, how they preached and walked after they had extraordinarily received the Holy-Ghost, c. 2.
- IIII. After the feast of Pentecost, viz. 1. How the Apostles, (upon report of the miracle that Peter and Iohn had wrought upon the lame man, and the doctrine they had boldly taught, against all the oppositions and threats of the Priests and Elders) powred forth their prayers against the enemies of Christ and his Gospel. c. 3, 4. to 32. 2. How themselves provided for the necessities of Christians that wanted, c. 4, 32. to c. 5. 3. How they wrought wonders to the conversion of many, c. 5, 12. to 17. 4. How the Apostles were imprisoned and beaten for preaching Iesus Christ, and how stoutly they behaved themselves under these sufferings. c. 5, 17. to [Page 174] the end. 5. How thu [...] Apostles appointed seven Deacons to take care of the poore, whereof Steven being one, wrought miracles, disputed, was accused, answered his Accusation, and is barbarously stoned to death, c. 6. & 7. 6. How the Apostles continuing at Ierusalem, in the great persecution occasioning the dispersion, sent Peter and Iohn to Samaria to preach to them. The Holy Ghost also sending Philip to baptize the Ethiopian Eunuch, and to preach, c. 8. In which persecution, Saul being a great actor, was wonderfully converted and called to the Apostleship, c. 9, 1. to v. 32.
- 2 More specially. The Acts of Peter and Paul are storied.
- I. Peters acts. viz. 1. His miracles wrought, recovering Aeneas and raising Dorcas from death, c. 9, 32. to the end. 2. His doctrine, preached to Cornelius a Gentile, c. 10. Defended against them of the circumcision, that opposed his communion with the uncircumcised, c. 11. 3. His imprisonment and miraculous release, c. 12.
- II. Pauls Acts are recorded according to foure remarkable per [...]grinations or journeys which he took; viz.
- 1. His first journey was with Barnabas, to the Gentiles. His Deeds and Acts in that journey, are in c. 13.14.
- 2. His second journey with Silas, from Antioch to Ierusalem, where 1. The occasion [Page 175] of the journey, viz. the doctrine of certaine comming from Ierusalem, That circumcision was necessary to salvation; whereupon that famous Synod was called at Ierusalem, c. 15. 2. Pauls Deeds and Acts, while he was in Asia, c. 16. 3. Pauls Deeds and Acts while he abode in Graecia, untill he returned againe to Antioch, c. 17. to c. 18. vers. 22.
- 3. His third journey undertaken for the Ephisians sakes, where note 1. Whence he went. c. 18.23, &c. 2. What way he travelled, Going, c. 19. Comming, c. 20 3. Whither he came, viz. to Ierusalem. c. 21.22, 23. Then to Cesarea, where consider things done under Felix, c. 24. under, Festus, c. 25. under [...]grippa, c. 26.
- 4 His fourth and last Journey which he took towards Rome, c. 27, 28.
II. EPISTOLICAL BOOKS.
THE EPISTOLICAL BOOKS of the New Testament, are, All the Epistles, written by the Apostles; the Apostles being oft-times unable to instruct by their personall presence, supplyed that by writing Epistles. These Epistles are either written, 1. To the Beleeving Gentiles, Or 2. To the Beleeving [Page 176] Iews; as was formerly noted,
1 To the beleeving Gentiles, The Apostle Paul wrote his Epistles, which are either 1. Generall written to whole Churches: Or 2. Particular to some select particular persons. Some do rank Pauls Epistles thus, according to the persons to whom they were written, viz.
Pauls Epistles were written either
- To whole Churches, either in
- Europe, as to the Churches at
- Rome. — in Italie.
- Corinth. in Grecia
- Thessalonica in Grecia
- Philippi.—in Thracia
- Asia, as to the Churches at
- Galatia in Asia Minor
- Ephesus in Asia Minor
- Colosse in Asia Minor
- Iudea, and in other Nations dispersed, as the Epistle to the Hebrewes.
- To particular persons; as to
Others endeavour, and that not unprofitably to marshall Pauls Epistles, in the Order of times and seasons, wherein they were severally written, which Order is not observed as they are placed in our Bibles. And though the [Page 177] punctuall time when every Epistle was written, cannot evidently and infallibly be demonstrated either by the Epistles themselves, or other Ecclesiasticall Histories, yet we may have good probabilities hereof, as may appeare in this Type or Table ensuing, viz.
Pauls Epistles were written, 1. Before his Bonds and Captivity at Rome. 2. In his Bonds and Imprisonment there.
- I. Before his Bonds and Captivity at Rome, as these seven Epistles in this Order, viz.
- 1. First of all seems to be written the I. To Thessal. From Athenes by Tychicus. For Paul by reason of the tumultuous Jews going from Thessalonica to Berea, and thence to Athenes Act. 17. thence he confirmes the Thessalonians in the faith by his first Epistle, written about seventeen years after his Conversion, ninth yeare of Claudius, and nineteenth yeare after Christs passion, when the Councell at Ierusalem was held. Hieron.
- 2. About the same time, and in the [Page 178] same place Paul seemes to have written the II. To Thessal. by Tychicus also. For what he had written in the former of Christs coming, and of the end of the world, he further explaines in this, and vindicates.
- 3. The I. To Timothy seems written by Paul, from Laodicea, of Phrygia Palatina, sent by Tychicus the Deacon, when returning the second time from Ierusalem, he passed through the Region of Galatia and Phrygia, Acts 18.23. and before he returned to Ephesus, Acts 19.1. For he promiseth to Timothy, that he would shortly come thither. 1 Tim. 3.14. viz. in the nineteenth yeare after his Conversion, (as is thought) in the eleventh of Claudius, and the one and twentieth after Christs death.
- 4. Next seems written the I. To Corinth, from Ephesus, while Paul stayed there, Act. 19.9. (and this rather then from Philippi, as the Greek postscript intimates,) [Page 179] and before he went through Macedonia,) 1 Cor. 16.5. for he passed through Macedonia, after his three years abode at Ephesus. See Acts 19.1.8.10. compared with Act. 20.1. about the end of which time he is supposed to write this Epistle at Ephesus before Pentecost. For he saith, I will tarry at Ephesus, until Pentecost; 1 Cor. 16.8. which when he wrote, he seems plainly to be at Ephesus: And this Pentecost went before that Pentecost, when he intended to be at Ierusalem, Act. 20.16. which fell out about the sixty fourth yeare after Christs death, in the ninth of Nero, which yeare coming to Ierusalem with the Contribution, he was cast into Bonds, in the thirtieth yeare after his Conversion, Athanas. in Synops. Chrysostome.
- 5. Not much after this first Epistle, Paul wrote his II. To Corinth, from Philippi when after Demetrius his tumult, he left Ephesus and came into Macedonia, Acts [Page 180] 20.1, 2, 3. for then he must needs come to Philippi, (which was the first city upon the coast of Macedonia, Act. 16.12.) Hither referre that promise of his that he would come to Corinth, with them of Macedonia, 2 Cor. 9.4. that is there said to be done, when after he had passed thorough Macedonia into Greece, he had stayed three moneths, Ast. 20.2, 3. and after, we never read that he returned into Greece.
- 6. In the same passing through Macedonia; At Nicopolis not farre distant from Philippi, before he came into Greece, Paul is supposed to have written his Epistle To Titus whom he cals from Creet to Nicopolis, because there he had determined to winter, Tit. 3.12. though he seems after to have altered his purpose, and to have wintred in Grecia, as is thought at Corinth.
- 7. The eminent Epistle to the Romanes seems to have been written, whilst Paul was wintring [Page 181] at Corinth. For after that, we read not that he returned to Corinth, but having wintred in Greece because of the treacheries of the Jewes, returning through Macedonia, he came into Syria with the Contribution, whence at last he was carried bound to Rome, in the sixty fourth yeare of Christ, the ninth of Nero, and in the thirtieth year after his own Conversion. So that the II. To Corinth, To Titus, and To the Romans, all these three seems to bewritten, as is said, and all within the space of halfe a yeare: but the Epistle to the Romans seems to be the last he wrote before he came captive to Rome. Origen & Chrysost prove it was written after both the Epistles to Corinth: because in both those Epistles he stirs them up to a Collection for the poor Saints at Ierusalem, 1 Cor. 16.1. to 6. 2 Cor. 8. and 9. which contribution he saith he had received from the Churches of Macedonia and Achaia, [Page 182] Rom. 15.25. to carry it into Iudea; and he brought it to Ierusalem, in his last journey into Syria, described Act. 20. and 21. as himselfe testifies in his Apology before Felix, Act. 24.17.
- II. In his Bonds and imprisonment at Rome, and this under, 1. His former. 2. His later imprisonment.
- I. Vnder his former imprisonment, when he was in more free custody at his first coming to Rome Act. 28.16, 20, 30, 31. Then probably he wrote his Epistle to the Hebrewes, for he promiseth the Hebrews to come and see them, Heb. 13.23. therefore then he had some hopes of liberty, or it may be he had liberty at that time and preached in Italy. whence perhaps the Epistle is said to be written, not from Rome, but from Italy.
- II. Vnder his latter imprisonment when he was clapt up in close [...] restraint. Then he wrote his other six Epistles (in which he mentions [Page 183] his chains) and probably he wrote them in this order, viz.
- 1. To the Galatians to whom he writes that he beares in his body the mark [...] of the Lord Iesus, Gal. 6.17. i. e. either his chaines, torments, or brands.
- 2. To the Ephesians, to whom he mentions his chain, Eph. 6.20.
- 3. To the Philippians, whom he salutes in the name of divers of Caesar's houshould, Phil. 4.22,
- 4. To the Colossians whom he requests to remember his bonds, Colossians 4.18.
- 5, To Philemon, Paul wrote being a Prisoner and now aged, Phil. 9. and it is thought he wrote this Epistle after his first Apology, in which all men forsook him, but the Lord stood by him, and delivered him from the mouth of the Lyon, 2 Tim. 4.17. Therefore having some dawnings of hope that he should be delivered, he desires Philemon to prepare him a lodging, for I trust (saith he) that through your prayers I shall be [Page 184] given unto you, Phil. 22. but the Lord had otherwise determined. Some think this Epistle was written after the II to Timothy, because there he bids Timothy and Mark to come to him, whom here he intimates to be with him, ver. 1.24. But others collect rather the contrary, 1 Partly because here he desires a lodging to be provided for him, ver. 22. but in that Epistle he is not solicitous about his lodging, but about his departure out of this life, 2 Tim. 4.6. 2 Partly because, there he complains that Demas had forsaken him, 2 Tim. 4.10. But here he salutes Philemon in Demas his name, ver. 24. Therefore this Epistle was written before Demas his desertion, or Demas had returned againe unto him.
- 6. Last of all, a little before his Martyrdome (whichfell out in the thirty seventh yeer of Christ, in the fourteenth yeer of Nero, & in the thirty fifth yeer after his [Page 185] own conversion) Paul wrote his II. to Timothy, as all Circumstances evince, and the Epistle it selfe intimates. I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand, 2 Tim. 4.6.
This noting the severall times of the Apostles writing his Epistles is usefull, To let us see why the Apostle wrote so variously about the same things, as Circumcision and other Ceremonies, As; To the Romanes, that they should receive the weake, &c. about Ceremonies and indifferent things, Rom. 14. 1. &c. But to the Galatians, and Colossians, utterly condemns use of Circumcision, &c. Gal. 5.2. &c. Col. 2, the reason is the difference of times, Chrisostome. Ceremonies were alwayes Mortales, mortall; at Christs death became Mortuae, dead; onely Moses must be honourably buried, for the weak Iewes the use of them was permitted a while; but after that they became Mortiferae, deadly to them that used them.
[Page 186]But here Pauls Epistles shall be considered according to the method and distribution of all the Books of the New Testament first proposed: and that the rather, because so we shall view them as they stand in order in our Bibles.
And first of Pauls Generall Epistles to whole Churches, which are nine, viz.
Romanes.
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the ROMANES. So denominated, 1. Partly from the object to whom the Epistle is written, viz. The believing Romanes, Rom. 1.7. When this Epistle was written, there was so famous a Church at Rome, that their Faith was spoken of throughout the whole World, Rom. 1.8. Yea there were even in Caesars houshould that had received the faith. Phil. 4.22. But by whom or when was the Church of the Romanes first planted? Answ. Scripture is silent, Papists say by Peter, Bel [...]m. de [Page 187] Pont. Rom. l. 2. c. 2. But Peter never was at Rome, much lesse planted the Church there D. Pareus in Rom. 16. Pub. II. Barnabas is supposed to have preached Christ at Rome, and to have converted the Romanes, under the Reign of Tyberius, if Clement may be believed. Recognition. Clementis lib. 1. But now Rome is as infamous as once it was famous, being the seat of Antichrist, Rev. 17, 9, &c. the Spirituall Egypt Rev. 11.8. Sodome Rev. 11.8. And Babylon devoted to destruction, Rev. 18.2, &c. 2. Partly from the Penman of the Epistle, viz. Paul, Rom. 1.1.
PAUL is a Latin name from Paulus, i. e. a little one, so the Romanes were wont to call them that were of a lesser stature, he seemes most to be delighted with this Romane name, being appointed Apostle to the Gentiles. Some think he first had this name given him, upon occasion of his conversion of Sergius Paulus the Deputy, Act. 13.7.9.12▪ Hieronym. de claris Script, Before he was called Saul, i. e. desired, asked, &c. From the Hebrew [...] Shaal, i. e. he hath asked, desired, &c. It is not likely that he [Page 188] changed his name Saul into Paul: but rather that he had two names, as all the Iews had that were freemē of Rome; Saul then denoted his nation and Religion, Paul signified his Roman freedome. And Scripture favours this that he had two names, saying, Saul, which also is Paul, Act. 13.9. The History of Paul is notably described in the New Testament, especially in Phil. 3. 1 Tim▪ 1. And in Act. 13. to the end of the Book, but more summarily, Act. 22.3, to 22. and 26.4. to 24. He was a Iew by Nation; of the Tribe of Benjamin; of the Province of Cilicia; borne in the City Tarsus, (which being a Colony and having the priviledge of the Romane freedome, Paul though of Iewish Parents, yet saith he was a Roman free-born, Act. 22.7.28.) circumcised the eighth day; brought up at the feet of Gamaliel; a great proficient above many in the Iewish Religion; in his Zeale persecuting all that seemed to oppose it; held the garments of those that stoned Stephen, consenting to his death; made havock of the Church, &c. But at last, as he was in his Circuit of persecution, he [Page 189] was miraculously converted of a Wolfe to become a Lamb, and of a Persecuter to be a prime Apostle, in his Apostleship he suffered and laboured more then all the rest of the Apostles; was peculiarly sent to teach the Gentiles. At last he was carryed bound to Rome, and there he was be headed by Nero in seventeenth yeere after Christ's Ascension, in the fourteenth yeer of Nero, and thirty fifth yeere after his conversion, and buried in the Ostiense way. Hieronym. He wrote fourteen Epistles, of which one said, As oft as I read Paul, me thinks I heare not words so much as thunders, Paulum quotiesc [...]n (que) lego, videor mihi non verba au [...]dire, sed tonitrua. Hieronym. contr. Iovinian. de Epist. Paulin.
His Epistle to the Romanes, though no [...] first written, yet is set first. 1. By reason of the dignity of the Romanes to whom it was written, Rome being the Seate of the Empire, and Head of the World. 2. Because of the largenesse of the Epistle, this being the longest of all the Epistles. As Isaiah is set first being the longest of all the Prophets. 3. But especially from the dignity of [Page 190] the matter, and dexterity in handling it. The Body of Divinity is so admirably herein handled, espicially the principall points of Election, Reprobation, Redemption, Faith and Iustification by Faith, &c. that it is deservedly called by some Clavis Theologiae, the Key of Divinity; and Methodus Scripturae, the Method of Scripture.
When it was written, See in former Table. Where it was written, is to be considered. Origen in Praefat. Comment. thinks at Corinth. 1. Because he commends Phaebe to the Romans, Rom. 16.1. She was a servant to the Church at Cenchrea, which is a Port of Corinth. 2. Because he salutes them in the name of Gaius his Host, &c. Rom. 16.23. And Gaius a Corinthian, and there Baptized by Paul 1 Cor. 1.14. 3. Because he salutes them in the name of Erastus Chamberlaine of the City, Rom. 16.23. Who abode at Corinth, 2 Tim. 4.20. 4. The postscript testifies thus much.
Occasion and Scope of this Epistle seemes to be this. The report that Paul had received of some disagreements both in judgement and affection, in them [Page 191] of the Church of Rome, who were partly believing Jewes, partly believing Gentiles. The Iewes either wholly opposing the Gospel, or mingling Law and Gospel together in the case of Justification▪ and all of them excluding the Gentiles from the fellowship of Christ, and despising them, insisting too much upon the Prerogative of the Jew: Contrariwise the Gentiles, knowing that the Jewes were rejected of God, and the Gentiles implanted in their stead, too much insulted over them as a people cast away, boasting of their own wisdome and vertues, and using their Christian liberty with offence. Now to reconcile these Controversies, and to settle them both in the truth, and in unity of judgement and affection, the Apostle being hindred from coming to them deals by letters; Demonstrating that neither Iewes had cause to boast of their righteousnesse and Prerogatives, nor Gentiles of their wisdome: both of them naturally being liable to eternal condemnation notwithstanding, and both of them being to be justified by Faith in Christ alone, and that they should not abuse Grace, but walke in newnesse of life, &c.
[Page 192] Generall parts. In this Epistle to the Romanes are chiefly three parts.
- I. A Preface to the whole Epistle, c. 1.1. to 17,
- II. A Treatise, contayning the main substance of the Epistle, which is either, Informatory and Doctrinall. or Hortatory, and Practicall.
- 1. Doctrinall, viz, Touching the cause of our justification, more neere, more remote.
- 1. More neere cause of justification Where,
- 1. The false cause, viz. Works, is removed, c. 1.17. to end. c. 2. & 3.1, to ver. 21.
- 2. The true cause, viz. Faith, is
- 1. Defended from Calumnies, c. 2.21. to the end, & c. 3.
- 2. Confirmed by Abrahams example, and testimonies, c. 4.
- 3. Explicated by the fruits or effects thereof; 1. Inward, viz. Peace with God, and full assurance of Faith, c. 5. 2. Outward, viz. 1 Newnesse of life, c. 6. 2 Freedom from the curse of the Law, c. 7. 3 Constancy in the state of Grace, against all condemnation, notwithstanding al infirmities or afflictions, within or without them that are in Christ, c. 8.
- [Page 193]2. More Remote cause of justification viz. Predestination where, of
- 1. The Jewes rejection, described,
- 1. By the cause thereof, Gods pleasure, the Jewes unbeliefe, c. 9.
- 2. By the signes and effects thereof, their blindnesse c. 10.
- 2. The Jewes Restauration, and of the remnant to be saved, c. 11.
- 2. Practicall and Hortatory, inciting to good-works, and duties; either,
- 1. Generall, towards God and man, c. 12.
- 2. Speciall duties, either in 1. Things necessary, towards Superiours, c▪ 13▪ 2 Things indifferent and Arbitrary, towards inferiours, and the more infirm in Faith, c. 14. &, c. 15. ver. 1. to 14.
- III. A conclusion of the whole Epistle, consisting of 1 Excuses about his freedome in writing to them, his not coming to them; and other advertisements touching his purpose of seeing them, and his desires of their prayers, c. 15. ver. 14. to the end. 2. Commendations and Salutations, c. 16.
I Corinth:
THe first Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the CORINTHIANS.
So denominated from the Penman thereof, Paul (of whom in Epistle to the Romanes) and from the object to whom he wrote it, viz. The Corinthians; or the Church of God at Corinth, 1 Cor. 1.1, 2. CORINTH was an eminent City of Achaia (which Achaia by an Isthmus was annexed to Greece, neer to Athens) seated in an Isthmus, or a little tract of Land betwixt two Seas, the Aegean and Ionian Sea, A most famous Mart, very populous, and flowing with wealth, it was Lumen & decus totius Graeciae. Cic. pro leg. Manil. i. e. The Light and glory of all Greece: yet very infamous for luxury and multitudes of vices. Once utterly destroyed by L. Mummius the Roman Consul; but after for the opportunity of situation restored to its ancient splendour by Augustus. [Page 195] D. Pareus in prolegom. in I ad Corinth. Paul coming from Athens to Corinth, laid the first foundation of a Church there, 1 Cor. 3.10. He was the [...]r Spirituall Father that begot them, 1 Cor. 4.15. Converting, by his preaching, Crispus and Sosthenes chiefe Rulers of the Jewish Synagogue there; and many other Corinthians; among whom Paul continued preaching, a yeare and six Moneths; God assuring him by night in a Vision, that he had much people in that City. Act. 18.1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17. And this Church of Corinth grew one of the most eminen [...] Churches for all manner of spirituall gifts, 1 Cor. 1.5, 6, 7.
When and where this Epistle was written, See in the Table before Epistle to Romanes. As the Epistle to Romanes is set first for Doctrine of Faith: So this is set second for Doctrine of Church-government, excellently handled therein.
Occasion of writing this Epistle, seemes to be twofold. 1. The information that Paul had from them of the House of Cloe, of the many and wofull [Page 196] distempers that infested the Church of Corinth after Paul's departure, as 1 Schismes and Divisions 1 Cor. 1.11. &c. 2 Many notorious scandals, as Lusts, Incest, Covetousnesse, Law-suits, &c. 1 Cor. 5. & 6. 3 Idolatrous Communion with Infidels in their Idoll-feasts, 1 Cor. 8. & 10. 4 Vncomely habits in publique Assemblies, 1 Cor. 11.3, to 17. 5 Prophanations of the Lords Supper, 1 Cor. 11.17. to the end. 6 Barbarous confusion in their publique Church-Assemblies, 1 Cor. 14. And 7 finally such Epicure-like profanesse, as to deny the Resurrection and eternall life, 1 Cor. 15.12, &c. 2. The writing of some of the Corinthians unto the Apostle for satisfaction in some particular cases, as 1 about Marriage. 2 About Things sacrificed to Idols. 3 About Spirituall gifts. 4 About Prophesying. And 5 about charitable Collections for the Saints in Iudea. 1 Cor. 7.1.
Scope. The Apostle therefore in this Epistle principally endeavours, To apply healing medicines speedily to all the evils and maladies that began to grow in that Church; and to give them satisfactory Resolutions in all the particulars, [Page 197] wherein they craved his advise from the Lord.
Generall parts. In this I. Epistle to Corinthians, consider
- I. The exordium or Preface to the whole Epistle, c. 1. v. 1. to 10.
- II. A Treatise of severall subjects, according as the present state and necessity of the Church required, in respect of their present corruptions abounding; and Paul's Resolution in some doubts propounded. Herein therefore the Apostle,
- 1. Sharply taxeth their Schismes and divisions about their Ministers, and their diversity of gifts, as eloquence, &c. for which some factiously admired one, some another, c. 1, 10. to c. 5. Herein note 1. An emphaticall exhortation to unity, c. 1.10. to 14. 2. Paul's tacit clearing himselfe from being any cause of these divisions among them, either 1 By His Baptism, he baptizing very few, and none in his own name, v. 14. to 17. or 2 By his Preaching amongst them, for he preached Christ crucified, not with wisedome of words to entice them, but in demonstration of the spirit and power to save them, yet his doctrine was farre above the reach of carnall men c. 1, 17. to the end and, c. 2. 3. He [Page 198] shows why he preached to thē so plainly, because they were carnal, c. 3, 1. to 5. 4. That their Teachers should be no such cause of divisions; They are but Ministers, can do nothing without God, and therefore he warnes their Teachers to take heed that they build upon Christ the foundation; and people not to admire mens persons, c. 3, 5. to the end. 5. He directs them what account to have of him and his Ministry, and how little cause they have to prefer their other eloquent teachers before him, c. 4.
- 2. He severely reproveth divers notorious scandals amongst them. As 1. Their suffering of the incestuous person among them, who should have been delivered to Sathan by their Church-Governours, c. 5. 2. Their covetous and quarrelsome law-suits even before Infidels, c. 6, 1. to 12. 3. Their fornications, which they counted as indifferent things, c. 6.12. to the end.
- 3. He resolveth their doubts or questions propounded to him, touching
- 1. Marriage, and therein concerning
- 1. Conjugall benevolence, c. 7.1. to. 8.
- 2. The unmarried and widowes, v. 8, 9.
- 3. Divorce, v. 10. to 25.
- 4. Virgins, v▪ 25. to the end.
- 2. Idolothytes, or things sacrificed to Idols, shewing that they ought not [Page 199] (under pretence of Christian liberty,) eat to the scandal of their brethren, c. 8: as he preached without wages (which yet were due to him) that he might avoid the calumny of his Antagonists; and became all things to all men to gaine them. c. 9. By other arguments he condems eating things sacrificed to Idols, as being idolatry, or communion with devils, and inconsistent with communion with Christ in his supper, c. 10. & c. 11.1.
- 4. He directs and endeavours to reforme their practice in divers particulars. 1. How men and women are to behave themselves in point of their outward Habits, in publique Assemblies, c. 11, 2. to 17. 2. How the Lords Saints ought to be managed and received c. 11. v. 17. to the end. 3. How all spirituall gifts are to be employed for promoting the Churches profit and preserving the unity of the mysticall body, c. 12. beyond all which gifts, grace, as love, &c, is much to be preferred; yea gifts without grace are as nothing, c. 13. 4. How they should prophecy, (the woman still keeping silence in their Churches) c. 14.
- 5. He condemnes and confutes the prophane errour of them that denied the Resurrection, c. 15.
- [Page 200]6. He instructs them about the Collections for the Saints at Jerusalem, [...]c. 16, 1.2, 3, 4.
- III, The Conclusion of the whole Epistle, with certain advertisements about more private affairs, exhortations to certain duties, and salutations, c. 16.5. to the end
II Corinth.
THe II. Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the CORINTHIANS, So called from Paul the Penman of it. (of whom see before in Epistle to the Romans) and from the parties to whom he wrote, viz. The Church at Corinth, (of which see in I. to Corinth.) and to all the Saints in all Achaia, 2 Cor. 1.1. probably there being many Saints in that Province, who could not so safely and conveniently meet in Church-Assemblyes, but were dispersed up and down by reason of the turbulency of those times. Calvin in loc.
When this Epistle was written, see before in the Table.
[Page 201] Occasion of this Epistle seems to be, those Calumnies and aspersions cast upon Pa [...]ls words and actions by false Apostles and other his adversaries after his former Epistle; they charged him with l [...]vity, that he came not to them according to his premise: with pride and tyrannicall severity, because of the incestuous person: with less [...]ning the authority of the law: and that however he was glorious in his letters, yet in person he was but base, &c. Paul therefore wipes off these aspersions, & shows that he wrote not his former Epistle to them for any such ends, but for promoting of their salvation. So that this Epistle is for most part of it Apologeticall, viz. Pauls Apology against his adversaries calumnies, and this the end and Scope of it; as also to testify his love to them, and to prevent his having sorrow from them, when he should come unto them. 2 Cor. 2.3, 4.
Principall parts. are
- I. An introduction or Exordium to his Epistle, c. 1, 1. to 8.
- II. The substance of his Epistle, containing a Treatise Apologeticall and Hortatory.
- 1. In the Apologeticall or excusatory part of he Epistle.
- [Page 202]1. He purgeth himselfe both from the charge of l [...]vity and temerity that he came not to them according to his promise, 1 Cor. 16.2. to 8. And of severity in the case of the incestuous person, showing them the true causes of his absence, wherein (to clear himself from severity, &c,) he inserts his exhortation to them, touching the restoring and comforting of the incestuous person, excommunicated according to his former Epistle, but now repenting c. 1, 8. to the end, and c. 2.
- 2. He commends and magnifies his ministery to them, 1 Partly from the effect it had on them, Converting them, c. 3, 1. to 6. 2 Partly from the subject matter of his ministry, viz. The Gospel farre surpassing the law in glory, c. 3, 6. to the end. 3 Partly from his undaunted constancy in preaching the Gospel, notwithstanding all afflictions thereupon incident unto him, those afflictions working for him a far more exceeding and eternall weight of glory, c. 4. His assurance of which glory he demonstrates upon divers grounds, c. 5.
- 2. In the Hortatory part of the Epistle, He exhorts the Corinthians, and beseecheth them
- [Page 203]1. To walke worthy of the Gospel, and not to receive the grace of God in vaine, and this is done more Generally, c. 6, 1, to 14. More specially by avoiding the fellowship of insidels and idolaters, c. 6, 14. to the end, and c. 7, 1.
- 2. To beare him like affection in receiving his doctrine and exhortations, as he beares towards them for their repentance; and kindnesse to Titus, c. 7, 2. to the end.
- 3. To a liberall contribution, to the poor Saints at Ierusalem, and in Iudea; and this by many emphaticall Arguments, c. 8, and c. 9.
- 4. To behave themselves with such du [...]ifull obedience to his doctrine and ministry, that he may have cause to use lenity and gentlenesse towards them, and not be put to exercise that severity against them which he intended against some, c, 10. whereupon (that he may vindicate himselfe and his Apostleship from contempt in their eyes, who preferred the false Apostles before him) he enters upon a necessitated and forced commendation of himselfe and his Apostleship by many considerations, c. 11. and c. 12.
- III. The Conclusion of the whole Epistle,
- 1. With Comminations of severity and [Page 204] sharpnesse, which he will use towards them, if they repent not, c. 13, 1. to 11.
- 2. With valedictory exhortations and salutations, c. 13. v. 11, 12, 13, 14.
Galatians.
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the GALATIANS. So intituled from the Penman Paul, who wrote it: and from the Churches in Galatia to whom he wrote it. Gal. 1.1, 2. Galatia, so called from Galli, i. e. The French, that came and inhabited there, who called the countrey after their name. That they were French, all agree; but from what part of France they came, is lesse evident; see Calvin's judgement herein, Calv. in Argum. Epist. ad Galat. Galatia was an ample Province of Asia Minor, neer to Phrygia, into which anciently entred a people from Gallia of Europe, and seated themselves betwixt Bithynia and Cappadocia, as is testified by Strabo. l. 12. Iustin. l. 25. ab initio. [Page 205] Livi. l. 8. decad. 4. Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 32. The more principall cities in the Province of Galatia, (as Appianus in Chronolog. fol. 44. notes) were these Synopa, Pompriopolis, Claudiopolis, Ancyra, (the Metropolis, famous for an ancient Councel there,) Laodicea, Antioch and Nicopolis, D. Pareus in Com. in Gal. 1.2. Paul with Silas and Timothy, travelled through the region of Galatia once, but were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, Act. 15.40. and 16.1, 2.3.6 But afterwards he went over all the Countrey of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples, Act. 18.23. In which countrey of Galatia, in most of the famous cities, Paul had planted famous Churches of Christ, as is conceived, Gal. 1.8. &c.
Occasion. It seemes by the current of the Epistle, that after Pauls departure from Galatia, having planted the Gospel there: there came among them false Apostles and corrupt teachers, who endeavoured to disgrace Paul's Apostleship among them, and to pervert the purity and simplicity of the Gospel among [Page 206] them, and to pervert the purity and simplicitie of the Gospel of Christ, by mixtures of legall doctrines: urging the observance of both morall and ceremoniall law, and particularly of circumcision, as necessary to Justification; so mingling and blending together Law and Gospell, works and faith, Iudaisme and Christianisme: tending dangerously to the subversion of that Church.
Scope. Hence the Apostle yearning over these Churches, writes this Epistle to them, to recover them out of this errour in that fundamentall point of Iustification: to convince them of Iustification by faith only; to demonstrate unto them the nature and use of morall and ceremoniall law: and incite them to a holy Christian Conversation.
Principall parts of this Epistle, to this end, are,
- I. An Exordium, preface, or entrance into the Epistle, wherein he notably asserts the divine authority of his Apostleship, against false Apostles denying it, c, 1, 1. to 6.
- II. A Treatise containing matters, Reprehensory, Informatory or doctrinall, and Hortatory▪
- [Page 207]I, Reprehensory, wherein he sharply taxeth them that they had so soon fallen from the Gospell doctrine of Justification by faith, which he had preached to them, to an opinion of Justification by the works of the law, c. 1, 6. to c. 3, 1. To this end that he may more fully convince them of their errour in forsaking the Gospel which he preached, he shewes, after his serious obtestation, 1. How he had his doctrine from God, who called him to preach to the Gentiles, c. 1, 11. to 16. 2. How faithfully he had preached the Gospell committed to him, withstanding all legall mixtures in point of Justification, c. 1, 16. to c. 3, 1.
- II. Informatory or Doctrinall, wherein he asserts and proves the doctrine of Justification by faith alone, and not by legall works, by many Arguments, c. 3, 4. As for example, because
- 1. They received the spirit not by preaching of the law, but by preaching of faith, c. 3, 1. to 6.
- 2. Abraham the father of the faithfull was justified by faith; consequently so must his faithfull seed be justified whether Jews or Gentiles, c. 3, 6. to 15.
- 3. The heavenly inheritance is not by law, but by promise, therefore of faith, c. 3, 15. to 19. And here by way of prolepsis to prevent objections, he shews what was the use [Page 208] of the law before Christ, and why the ceremoniall law is abolished at Christs comming; c. 3, 20. to c. 4. v. 12. And he lenisies the sharpnesse of his former rebukes, by signifying his humble, modest and tender carriage towards them, c. 4, 12. to 21.
- 4. The very testimony of the law it selfe condemnes this Justification by the works of the Law, as he evidences in the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah, c. 4, 21. to the end.
- III. Hortatory, here the Apostle exhorts them 1. Constantly to persist in their Christian Liberty from the ceremoniall law, c. 5, 1. to 13. 2. Not to abuse their Christian liberty, v. 13. 3. To severall generall duties of Christianity, c. 5, 14. to c. 6, 11.
- III. A Conclusion of the whole Epistle containing, 1 A Testification of his love unto them, in writing to them with his own hand. 2 A commonefaction against false teachers. 3 An opposition of his owne example against that of the false Apostles, he preaching the Gospel sincerely, walking accordingly, and being willing to suffer for it; and his 4 Valediction, c. 6, 11. to the end.
Ephesians.
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the EPHESIANS. So denominated from the Saints at Ephesus to whom Paul wrote, Eph. 1.1. EPHESUS was a city on the shore of the Ionian sea, looking towards the west of Asia Minor, of old a city of great traffique, but much addicted to magick Arts, and to superstition, there being the Temple of the great goddesse Diana, Act. 19, Paul came to Ephesus at first, and reasoned with the Jewes in their Synagogues, but tarried not there at that time, because he hasted to keep the feast at Ierusalem, Acts 18, 19, 20, 21. After that he came a second time to Ephesus, and continued there preaching and disputing for two years and three moneths, and so planted a famous Church there, Act. 19.1, 8, 10. &c. 1 Cor. 16.9, till by the uproare at Ephesus he was necessitated to depart, Act. [Page 210] 20.1. yet after his departure into Macedonia, Act. 19.1, 2. he committed the care and inspection of the Church at Ephesus unto Timothy, 1 Tim. 1.3, 4. &c. And Paul being afterwards at Miletus, called thither the Elders of Ephesus, exhorting and encouraging them in their charge, knowing they should see his face no more, Acts 20.17. to the end. After Timothy, it is supposed Iohn the Evangelist was Bishop of this Church.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in Table before Epistle to Romans.
Occasion of Pauls writing to the Ephesians, was not Schismes and Scandals, as in the Church of Corinth; nor false doctrine supplanting justification by faith, that fundamentall point, as in the Church of Galatia; But the Apostles singular tendernesse and provident care of this Church, (he being not now farre from his death,) lest they should faint or be discouraged by his bonds at Rome, and be weary of the Gospel through the Crosse.
Scope, To encourage the Ephesians to [Page 211] constancy in faith and piety, and growth therein, notwithstanding all his or their tribulations for the Gospel.
Principall Parts, To this end, are▪
- I. The Inscription or Exordi [...]in of the Epistle, c. 1, 1, 2.
- II. The Body of the Epistle being Doctrinall and Hortatory.
- 1. Doctrinall, wherein he laid down Gods benefits to them and us, or the causes of salvation.
- 1. Gods eternall and free Predestination of us to adoption in Christ, through faith, c. 1.
- 2. Redemption by the bloud of Christ, and effectuall vocation by his grace, c. 2.
- 3. Publication of the riches of Christ by the Gospel, especially by his ministery to the Gentiles. c. 3.
- 2. Hortatory, wherein by way of gratitude for former benefits, he stirs them up to divers Christian duties, which are either,
- 1. More generall and common to all Christians, c. 4. and c. 5, 1. to 22.
- 2. More speciall and peculiar to some particular relations, as to,
- 1. Husbands and wives, c. 5.21. to the end.
- [Page 212]2. Parents and children, c. 6, 1. to 5.
- 3. Masters and servants, c. 6, 5. to 10.
- III. The Conclusion of the Epistle, wherein he encourages them to be strong and constant against all temptations, through the help of the compleat Armour of God, described; showes why he sent Tychicus to them, and so concludes, c. 6, 10. to the end.
Philippi:
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the PHILIPPIANS. So intituled because written by Paul to the Saints, Bishops and Deacons at Philippi, Phil. 1.1. PHILIPPI was the name of two cities, viz. one in Thessalie, at first called Dathos, but after Philippi from Philip of Macedo who repaired it. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 124. Another a city of Macedonia, situate in the confines of Thracia, in the fields whereof Pompey was overcome by Caesar; and after [Page 213] Brutus and Cassius, by Anthony and O [...]avi [...]s. This latter Philippi, is here meant to this Philippi, Paul came, being warned by vision to go into Macedonia, Act. 16.9. to the end of the chapt. Here Lydia and the Iailor were converted, and Paul here laid the foundation of a slourishing Church, Calv. Argum. in Ep. ad Philip.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, see in former Table, &c.
Occasion, the Church at Philippi sent their bounty to Paul now Prisoner at Rome, to support him and supply his wants there, by Epaphroditus their Pastor, who doubtlesse coming to Paul, disclosed to him the spirituall stare of that Church, whereupon Paul writes this Epistle from Rome, by Epaphrodit us Phil. 2.25.
Scope. To confirme the Philippians in faith and Godlinesse, to warne them against Seducers, and to testify his thankfulnesse for their bountifull remembrance of him, in his distresses.
Principall Parts, to this [...]nd are
- [Page]I. An Exordium or Preface to his Epistle, c. 1, 1, 2.
- II. The Substance of the Epistle, wherein he
- 1. Confirmes them in the faith, by Promising to them Gods perfecting grace, Praising their zeal, Testifying his love to them, Removing the Scandall of the Crosse, and Intimating his great desire for the furtherance and joy of their faith, c. 1, 3, to 27.
- 2. Exhorts them to Piety, viz. to bearing the Crosse, unity, humility of minde, and purity of life, c. 1, 27. to c. 2, 19.
- 3. Commends their faithfull Ministers, Timothy and Epaphroditus, c. 2, 19. to the end.
- 4. Warnes them of the false Doctrine of false Apostles, that would mingle works with faith in Justification, opposing against them his owne example, desiring the Philippians to imitate him, c. 3.
- 5. Encourages them in divers particular and generall duties, c. 4, 1. to 10.
- 6. Gratefully commemorates their bounty to him, c. 4, 10. to 21.
- III. The Conclusion of the Epistle, with salutations and a valediction, c. 4, 21, 22, 23.
Colossians
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the COLOSSIANS. So intituled from the Colossians to whom Paul wrote this Epistle, to the Saints and faithfull Brethren in Christ, which are at Colosse, Col. 1.2. These Colossians were not that people dwelling in Rodes (called Colossians from that huge Colossus or Image of the Sunne 70 Cubites high, there erected: But rather those inhabitants of Colosse a chiefe City in Phrygia in Asia Minor, neere unto Hierapolis and Laodicea; as Hierome and Chrysostome thinke. And this Epistle it selfe seemes to intimate thus much, wherein he mentions Epaphr [...]s his zeale for them at Colosse, Laodicea, and Hierapolis, Col. 4.13. Bids them salu [...]e the brethren in Laodicea, ver. 15. and that this Epistle be read in the Church of the Laodiceans, ver. 16. Now Laodicea and Hierapolis are neere Colosse, but [Page 216] farre distant from Rhodes, as learned writers import. Xenophon in 1. de expedit. Cyri; writes, That after he entred into Phrygia, he went streight [...] i. e. Vnto Colosse a City of universall resort, rich, and great. Euseb. in Chronic. saith, That three Cities of Asia, Laodicea, Hierapolis and Colosse fell with one and the same earthquake. And Plin. in Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 32. Seates not Colosse in any Iland, but among the Cities of the Continent.
When and whence this Epistle was written, see in the former Table.
Occasion. Epaphras fellow-labourer with the Apostles, had in Colosse with other Ministers planted a Church. The Faith preached to the Colossians was impugned, Partly by some converted out of Iudaisme who urged the Ceremonies of the Law as necessary to Salvation, confounding Christ and Moses together: Partly by some converted out of Gentilisme, who obtruded Philosophicall subtilties upon them, counting the simplicity of the Gospel too much below wise men, and so blended Theology [Page 217] with Philosophy, The Apostle therefore being prisoner at Rome, writes to them to instruct and stablish them in the true Doctrine of the Gospel taught them by Epaphras against all the impostures of false Teachers.
Scope. To shew, That all hope of mans Salvation is grounded in Christ alone, and that therefore we should fully rest our selves in the Faith of Christ, and live according to Gospel Rules, rejecting all Mosaicall Ceremonies, and Philosophicall speculations.
Principall parts. In this Epistle are,
- I. The Preface, containing, 1. The Inscription, c. 1.1, 2, 3. 2. The Entrance into the Epistle, wherein he commends their Faith and other graces, and wishes their growth therein, v. 3. to 12.
- II. The body of the Epistle consisting of matters Doctrinall and Practicall.
- 1. Doctrinall, where he, 1. Describes Iesus Christ and his benefits most lively▪ that he is the true sonne of God, head and Saviour of his Church most al-sufficient, c. 1.12, to c. 2.8. 2. Confutes Seducers that obtruded on the Colossians either Philosophicall notions, or Mosaicall [Page 218] antiquated Ceremonies, c. 2.8. to the end.
- 2. Practicall, where he instructs and exhorts them in Practicall duties either 1. Generall, common to all Christians, c. 3.1, to 18. 2. Speciall, peculiar to some Relations, Husbands, Wives, Parents, Children, Masters and Servants, c. 3.18. to c. 4.2. where he annexes some generall exhortations ver. 2. to 7.
- III. Conclusion of the whole Epistle, contayning some private Affairs and Salutations, c. 4.7. to the end.
I Thessal:
THe first Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the THESSALONIANS. So denominated, because written by Paul to the Church of the Thessalonians. 1 Thes. 1 1. And they from their City Thess. which was the Metropolis or mother City in Macedonia, Scituate on the edge of the Macedonian shore: Anciently it was called Thermae, and thence the Thermaick Haven. Suidas. Some give this reason of the [Page 219] change of the name; Philip King of Macedonia in a memorable Battle in these parts overcame the People of Thessaly. For monument of which Victory, the neighbouring City was reedified and enlarged, and named Thessalonica; as it were, [...] i. e. put the victory to another. It was sold by Andronicus to the Venetians, but they did not long enjoy it; for it was; as other parts of Greece, quickly possessed by the Turks. Is now a famous Empory for Indian Marchandice, (but under the Dominion and Idolatry of the Turks) known by the name of Saloniki. Maginus in Geograph.
In Thessalonica God pleased to plant a Church by the Ministry of Paul and Silas, converting both Jewes and Greeks. See the History of it, Act. 17.1. &c. There the unbelieving Jewes mov'd with envy, raised tumults against Paul and Silas, and also against the Saint [...] that entertained them, Iason &c. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. So that Paul and Silas were glad to fly away by night to Berea ver. 10.
Occasion (as may appeare from Act. [Page 220] 17. And 1 Thes. 2. & 3, 1.2,) was this. Paul being forced by tumults to depart from Thessalonica, and fearing least the Church there newly collected should be hazzarded through feare of troubles and persecutions; and going to Athens, he sends Timothy back to confirme the Thessalonians in the Faith, and report their stare to him. Where [...]on Timothy informing him of their constancy notwithstanding persecutions, and of all their affaires, from Athenes Paul wrote this Epistle to them for their encouragement. when this Epistle was written, see in Table above.
Scope. To encourage the Thessalonians both to constant perseverance in Faith and Grace received, notwithstanding all tribulations befalling him or them; As also to make progresse and go on therein unto perfection.
Principall parts, To this end are,
- I. The Inscription of the Epistle, c. 1.1.
- II. The substance or Subject matter of the Epistle is Hortatory. He Exhorteth,
- I. To constancy and perseverance in the Faith, c, 1.2. to c. 4. Whereunto he urges them.
- [Page 221]1. From the consideration of God; rich grace bestowed on them by the Apostles Ministry, and the generall fame thereof in the Churches of Christ, c. 1.2. to the end.
- 2. From the graciousnesse of the instrument whereby they were converted, viz. Paul whose Boldnesse, Sincerity, Meeknes and Amiable behaviour to them is declared c. 2.10. to 13.
- 3. From their own experience of the efficacy of the Doctrine of Faith, c. 2.13. to the end.
- 4. From the Apostles care and tendernesse over them, who (though he could not come himselfe to them, yet) sent Timothy to them to comfort and establish them, c. 3.
- II. To progresse in grace towards perfection therein 1. In generall, c. 4.1, 2, 3.2. In particular, he exhorts them to certaine duties (wherein perhaps they were Defective, or Endangered) as 1 Chastity, c. 4.4, 5. 2 Justice, ver. 6, 7, 8. 3 Brotherly love, ver. 9, 10. 4 Care of quiet and peaceable living together in Christian Society, ver. 11, 12. 5 Moderation of sorrow and lamentation for the dead in Christ; declaring what shall become of the Dead, what of the Living at Christs second coming, v. 13. to the end. After this he meets [Page 223] with that curious question that might be moved, but when shall these things be? Shewing it shall be sudden, though the particular time when, is not known; therefore they should alwayes be prepared, c. 5.1, to 12. 6 Due respect to the publique Ministry over them c. 5.12, 13. 7 And he shuts up his Exhortation with an heap of Christian duties concisely couched together, ver. 14. to 23.
- III. The conclusion of the Epistle, with Supplications for them, Salutations, and Valediction ver. 23. to the end.
II Thessal.
THe second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the THESSALONIANS. So stiled for the Reason above. When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in former Table.
Occasion seems to be some information, or Reports which the Apostle had received; touching their Persecutions for the Gospel; Touching false teachers, who insinuated to them (perhaps [Page 222] taking occasion by some passages of the former Epistle about Christs second coming) that Christs second coming wo [...]ld be speedily, in that age; and touching exorbitant walking of some, in idlenesse; Church-discipline mean while sleeping. The whole current of the Epistle intimates this occasion.
Scope. 1 To comfort the Church of Thessalonians against all Persecutions for Christ. 2 To informe them of their mistake about the second coming of Christ, that it could not be presently. And 3 to exhort them to divers Christian duties.
Principall parts, to these ends.
- I. Inscription and salutation, c. 1.1, 2.
- II. Body Of the Epistle, being
- 1. Consolatory against all sufferings and persecutions c. 1.3. to the end.
- 2. Monitory, warning them against that erroneous Doctrine which any false Teachers might suggest unto them, [...]s if Christs Second coming were at hand: wherein he prophetically assures them that before Christs coming, there will be an Apostacy, and a Revelation of Antichrist that man of sin, c. 2.
- 3. Hortatory, wherein he peremptorily [Page 224] prescribes Reformation of certain corruptions in manners & practice among them, interlacing divers sharp reproofs thereof. Because he deales somewhat sharply with them, 1. He premiseth an insinuative preface wherein, 1▪ He begs their prayers. 2 Perswades himself confidently of their obedience. 3 And Prayes for them, c. 3.1. to 6.2. He prescribes the Reformation of two evils, viz. 1 The remissenesse of Church-discipline towards inordinate walkers, ver. 6. to 11. 2 The neglect of manuall labour by some contrary to the Apostles Rule, ver. 11. to 16.
- III. The conclusion of the whole Epistle, with Supplications, Salutations and Valediction, ver. 16. to the end.
Thus farre of Pauls nine generall Epistles, written to whole Churches: Next come to be considered Pauls foure particular Epistles, directed to certaine particular persons, viz. Two to Timothy, and one to Titus about affairs Ecclesiasticall; and one to Philemon about matters Oeconomicall. Those Epistles to Timothy and Titus, Augustine would have him that is a Teacher in the Church to have alwayes before his [Page 225] eyes▪ Augustin. de Doctrin Christian. l. 4▪ c. 16.
I Timothy
THe first Epistle of the Apostle Paul to TIMOTHY. So denominated from Timothy to whom Paul wrote.
TIMOTHY Is a Greek name; Signifies, An Honourer of God. Probably his Godly Parents desired he might be such an one when they gave him this name: and he proved an excellent instrument of Honour to God both in Doctrine and conversation, according to the happy Omen and presage of his name. He is supposed to be of Lycaoni [...], in Asia. His Father was a Greek, his Mother a Jewesse who believed, Act. 16.1. her name Eunice, daughter of Lois his Grandmother; both sincere believers, 2 Tim. 1.5. From a child they trayned him up in the Scriptures, 2 Tim. 3.14, 15. Whence Paul is perswaded that the like Faith [Page 226] dwelt in him, as did in his mother and Grandmother, 2 Tim. 1.5. His Father being a Greek, he was not Circumcised after the custome of the Jewes, but being come to maturity, Paul circumcised him, for the gaining of the Jewes by his Ministry, Act. 16.3. And having good commendation of him by the brethren of Lystra and Iconium, Paul made him his companion in travels throughout the Churches, Act. 16.2, 3, 4. &c. Sometimes Paul sent him as a Messenger to the Churches; whereupon Paul makes such an honourable mention of him and his workes, Act. 19.22. Rom. 16.21. 1 Cor. 4.17. And 16.10. Phil. 2.19, 20, 21, 22. 1 Thes. 3.2, 6. Gives him divers excellent Titles, cals him his brother, 1 Thes. 3.2. Heb. 13.23. His beloved son and faithfull in the Lord, 1 Cor. 4.17. His natural son in the Faith, 1 Tim. 1.2. His dearely beloved sonne, 2 Tim. 1.2. The Minister of God; and his fellow-labourer in the Gospel of Christ, 1 Thes. 3.2. His work-fellow, Rom. 16.21. Yea Paul joynes Timothy with himselfe in the inscriptions of divers Epistles [Page 227] to the Churches, that so he might both commend Timothies worth and authority to the Churches, as also propound him as an exemplary pattern to all faithfull Ministers. See 2 Cor. 1.1. Phil. 1.1. Col. 1.1. 1 Thes. 1.1. 2 Thes. 1.1. Philem. 1. At last after many travels with Paul by Sea and Land, Paul returning into Asia committed the care of the Church of Ephesus to him, whom he knew to be so able and trusty, 1 Tim. 1.3. &c. Which he happily taught, and governed about fifteen yeers; but at last more grievously inveighing against the Idolatrous worships of Diana; under Nero the Christians cruel Enemy, he was slain of the Gentiles with Arrowes and Stones, as is testified by Eusebius Hist. l. 3. c. 14. Some thinke that his bones, together with the reliques of Andrew and Luke were translated to Constantinople by Constantine the Emperour. As Hieronym. and Nicephorus.
When this Epistle was written, see in the Table above.
Occasion and Scope. The Apostle being to depart into Macedonia, left Timothy [Page 228] at Ephesus, that he might prevent unsound Doctrine, and ordaine Elders for that Church. Compare Act. 20. 1 Tim. 1.3. &c. That therefore Timothy might the better know how to behave himselfe in that Church in all Ecclesiasticall affairs, he writes to him this Epistle, not knowing how long he should be absent from him. 1 Tim. 3.14, 15. So that this Epistle may not unfitly be stiled▪ St. Pauls Directory for right mannaging of the Office of the Ministery in the Church of God.
Principall parts, to this end; are
- I. The Inscription of the Epistle, c. 1, 1, 2.
- II. The matter or Substance of the Epistle, which is chiefly by way of practicall instruction or direction. He directs Timothy,
- 1. Touching [...]aith how to maintaine against the teachers of the Law, the truth of the Gospel wonderfully committed to Paul) notwithstanding all impediments, and to adde to faith a good conscience, c. 1, 3. to the end.
- 2. Touching Ecclesiasticall worship, for whom they should pray, c. 2.1. to 8. How men and women should behave themselves in prayer, and in publick assemblies, [Page 229] c. 2, 8. to the end.
- 3. Touching Church officers. 1 How Bishops and Deacons with their wives ought to be qualified, c. 3 1. to 14. To which he annects, the end or Scope of his writing this Epistle to Timothy, viz. That he might know how to governe the Church, the house of God, the pillar of truth, giving an Epitome of Gospel-truth, c. 3, 14. to the end. which he amplifies by a Propheticall prediction of the Apostacy, from the faith which should come to passe in the latter times, c. 4.1. to 6. 2 How Timothy should behave himselfe both in his doctrine and conversation, c. 4.6. to the end. How in private reproofs, c. 5, 1, 2. How towards widows, c. 5, 3, to 17. How towards Elders▪ c. 5, 17. to the end. What duties he should teach servants, and how he should carry himselfe towards them that teach otherwise, and count Gaine godlinesse, c. 6. to 17. And how he should instruct rich men, c. 6, 17, 18, 19.
- III. The Conclusion of the Epistle, exhorting Timothy to keep that which was committed to him, and to avoid prophane and vaine bablings, and oppositions of science, &c. c. 6, 20.21.
II Timoth:
THe second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to TIMOTHY. So denominated from Timothy to whom Paul wrote. A Description of this Timothy, see in former Epistle.
Occasion. The Apostle having left Timothy at Ephesus to take care of the Church there, 1 Tim. 1.3. when he departed from the Elders of Ephesus, after he had called them to Miletus, and given them charge of the flock, they all wept sore, Acts 20.36, 37. probably, Timothy was one of those that powred out tears, 2 Tim. 1.4. and perhaps the Apostle, that he might comfort Timothy lamenting him, intimated some hopes of his returne unto him, 1 Tim. 3.14. But Paul meane while being carried away captive to Rome, and by his bonds hindred from coming againe to Timothy, thought it necessary by this Epistle to stablish and comfort him, both [Page 231] against the Apostles sufferings and martyrdome approaching as also against all the pressures and persecutions of the Church, & that he should be moved by none of them, to desert or neglect the faithfull, keeping of that excellent treasure of truth, committed of trust to him, 2 Tim. 1.8, 13. and 2.1, 2, 3.4. and 4.1, 2, 5, 6. &c. and that they might more effectually be comforted in one another, he desires him to come shortly to him, 2 Tim. 4.9. that so they might take their last farewell one of another. For this was Pauls last Epistle (as his Swan-like Song) a little before his death, 2 Tim. 4.6, 7.
Scope, To stirre up and strengthen Timothy, to constancy and fidelity, in discharge of his ministeriall office, and the keeping and asserting of the truth, deposited and committed of trust to him; against all the present dangers and persecutions impending him or the Apostle for the same, in these perillous times.
Principall parts. to this end are
- I. An Inscription of the Epistle, c. 1, 1, 2, together with an insinuative patheticall [Page 232] proem, testifying his singular affection to Timothy, v. 3, 4, 5.
- II. The substance of the Epistle, which is chiefly Hortatory and Consolatory. Herein he,
- 1. Exhorts and encourages him to constancy and faithfulnesse in all the work of the Ministry committed to him, notwithstanding all the Apostles afflictions endured for the truth, all the troubles Timothy might incurre in defence of the truth, and the unfaithfulnesse of some revolting from the truth, c. 1, 6. to the end, and c. 2.
- 2. Prophetically forewarnes him of the perillousnesse of the last dayes, especially by reason of wicked hypocrites and Seducers, c. 3, 1. to 14.
- 3. Most earnestly incites and charges him to be constant in the faith, according to the Scriptures which he knew from a child, and to be instant in preaching the word, against all discouragements, after the Apostles example, who had finished his course, and now shortly was to receive his Crown, c. 3, 14. to c. 4, 9.
- III. Conclusion of the Epistle, with 1 Some particular directions, c. 4, 9. to 16. 2 Narration of his owne affairs, v. 16, 17, 18. 3 Salutations, v. 18. to 22. and 4 Valediction, v. 22.
Titus.
THe Epistle of Paul to TITUS. So intituled from the name of the person to whom he wrote, Tit. 1.1, 4. Titus is evidently a Greek name, either derived from [...] Titus, i. e, A Dove; (as Ionah in Hebrew hath his name from a Dove,) or rather from [...] Tio i. e. to honour, esteem, &c. thence [...], Titos i. e. Honoured; a fit name for him, that was truely honoured both by God and man. Titus was by Nation a Grecian, a Gentile, & uncircumcised probably till his death, Gal. 2.3. yet effectually converted by Paul to the faith, hence called his naturall sonne after the common faith, Tit. 1.4. yea he cals him his Partner and fellow-helper. 2 Cor. 8.23. and his brother, 2 Cor. 2.13. having enjoyed him as a companion of his travels, Gal. 2.1. a comfort in his sorrows, 2 Cor. 7.6. and having used him as a Legate or messenger unto divers Churches, [Page 234] and betrusted him with the Collections for the poor Saints in Iudea, 2 Tim. 4.10. 2 Cor. 8.6, 16, 17. Paul having planted a Church in the Isle of Creta, now called Candy, he left Titus there behind him to finish the work, appointing him to set in order things that were wanting, and to ordaine Elders in every city, Tit. 1.5. and there it is thought, he died and was buried.
Occasion and Scope, Paul having left Titus in Creet to order things wanting, &c. in the Church now planted there, and perceiving that in his absence false Teachers, erroneous in judgement, and scandalous in life, crept in, seeking to destroy the faith, by mingling Christ and Moses together, to disturbe Church-Government planted, and to disjoyne the practice from the profession of piety. Paul therefore sollicitous for the Church, writes this Epistle to Titus, both to strengthen and gaine Authority to his ministery there against all contempt; as also to direct him, how to order and stablish things wanting in the Church, how to represse distempers and disorders arising, and how to demeane himselfe, both in doctrine and conversation, towards [Page 235] severall sorts of Persons.
Principall parts to this end
- I. An Inscription, c. 1, 1, to 5.
- II. Substance of the Epistle, (of like nature to the I. To Timothy) wherein he
- 1. Declareth for what ends he left Titus in Creet, c. 1, 5.
- 2. Directeth him in reference to these ends.
- 1. What qualifications are requisite in Bishops, or Elders both for life and doctrine, c. 1, 6. to the end.
- 2. How Titus should accordingly approve himselfe in the ministry, both in his doctrine and life, and that towards both aged men and women, as also towards servants, c. 2. and generally towards all Christians, how he should teach them to behave themselvs, both towards magistrates, and mutually towards one another, backing the same with [...]ogent Arguments, c. 3, 1. to 12.
- III. A Conclusion of the whole Epistle consisting of more private directions, salutations, and his Apostolicall valediction, c. 3, 12. to the end.
Thus of Pauls Epistles written to particular persons about Ecclesiasticall affairs. Now of his Epistles written to particular [Page 236] persons, yea to a Church, Philem. 1.2. about Oeconomicall or Houshold affairs. viz.
Philemon.
THe Epistle of Paul to Philemon. So called because peculiarly and in the first place directed to him, Philem. 1.2. PHILEMON, as some thinke sounds like an Hebrew name, and signifies, The mouth of bread, so denoting his beneficence and bounty relieving them with bread, &c. that were poore and needy, See v. 7. Hieron. Others rather taking this Etymon to be uncertain, count Philemon a Greek name, signifying Kissing, from [...] Philema. i. e. A kisse, So intimating his kindnesse.
This is not that ancient Comick poet, called Philemon, which Paul seems to have read, by some expressions in his Epistles, as 1 Tim. 2.12. and 5.23. Tit. 2.3. The fragments of which poet are extant, collected by Henr. Steph. [Page 237] But this Philemon is supposed to be by Countrey a Phrygian, as Theophylact. and in particular a minister of the Church at Colosse, an eminent towne in Phrygia. Paul here cals him fellow-labourer, Phil [...]m. v. 1. viz. in preaching the Gospel; and a Partner, v. 17▪ compare Philem. v. 1, 2. with Col. 4.17, He is called a Bishop by Anselme, an Evangelist by Hierom. And here is mention of the Church in his house, v. 2. Probably, Philemon was converted or much edified by Pauls ministry, from that intimation, v. 19. was deare to Paul ▪ he cals him brother v. 7, 20. his dearly beloved. v. 1. He is commended for his faith in Christ, and bountifull love to all the Saints, vers. 5.7. Though rich, yet is suspected to be sornewhat too covetous, from that expression, v. 18, 19. We find no mention of him in Scripture, but only in this Epistle.
Occasion. Onesimus servant to Philemon, had much wronged him in purloyning his goods, (it is probably thought he stole some money from him) and so ranne away from him to [Page 238] Rome, where (providence so ordered things,) hearing Paul preach he was converted, and ministred to Paul in prison. But Paul understanding the cause of his depar [...]ing from his Master, sends Onesimus back again to his master with this Epistle, perswading him to forgive him, and entertaine him again.
Scope. To reconcile Onesimus, now converted, to Philemon his master, whom he had much wronged formerly, being unconverted, and had runne away from him.
Principall parts, of this most elegant and patheticall Epistle, to this end, are
- I. The Preface or Exordium to the Epistle, containing 1. The inscription, v. 1, 2, 3. 2. The Apostles Gratulation at Philemons faith in Christ, and liberall love to the Saints, v. 4. to 8, hereby he indears both himselfe and his request to Philemon.
- II. The Proposall of his request to Philemon, more generally, and after more particularly, viz. that he would againe receive Onesimus, whom he had sent to him, v. 8. to 13.
- III. Cogent Arguments, pressing this request, (every word almost being an Argument) some of which are couched in the Proposall [Page 239] of his request; As 1. Onesimus is converted, v. 10. 2. Now he will be a profitable servant, v. 11. 3. Onesimus was dear to Paul ▪ as his own bowels, v. 12, 4. Pauls prizing Onesimus his service, v. 13.14. 5. Providence seemed so to over-rule his departure by converting him in the interim, as if God would prepare him for constant service, v. 15. 6. He is now not a servant, so much as a brother in Christ, v. 16. 7. Paul that makes this request, is Philemons Partner, v. 17. 8. Philemon shall not loose by receiving him, v. 18, 19. 9. Paul shall reap the fruit of sweet refreshing in the grant of this request, v, 20.
- IIII. The Conclusion of the Epistle, containing 1. Pauls hope of Philemons gratifying him. 2. His request to prepare himselfe a lodging. 3. Salutations. 4. And the Apostolicall valediction, v. 21. to the end.
Hitherto of the Epistles written to the II believing Gentiles, and all by Paul: Now of the Epistles written to the believing Iews by severall Apostles.
Hebrews.
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the HEBREWS. So intituled in the Greek Copies, from the Penman writing it, and the parties to whom he wrote. The Syriack version hath it, The Epistle to the Hebrews.
HEBREWS. So denominated not from Heber, Selah's son, Sem's grandechild mentioned Gen. 10.24. But rather from Abram the father of the faithfull. and that not from the name Abram, which is written with [...] whereas Hebrews, is written originally with [...] viz. [...] Hhhibri. but from the Epithet given first to Abram, viz. Abram the Hebrew, Gen. 14.13. Abram being called [...] i. e. the Hebrew from [...] To passe over or passe thorough, Gen. 12.6. because from Mesopotamia he passed over Euphrates into Canaan, and so passed thorough the land. compare Gen. 12.1. to 7. with Act. 7.2, 3, 4. So that Abram [Page 241] the Hebrew, sounds as much as Abram the Passenger, or the Passer-thorough. Hence Abrams posterity are called Hebrews, which name seems somwhat more worthy then the name Iews, because the name Iews came but from Iudah, Iacobs son the kingly stock. To Hebre [...]s by nation, but now become Christians by profession, this Epistle was written. Some think the Apostle wrote only to those Hebrews that dwelt in Ierusalem and Iudea, because he promises to see them, Heb. 13.23. but Peter seems to testify this Epistle was written to the dispersed Hebrews; compare 2 Pet. 3.15. and 3.1, 2. with 1 Pet. 1.1, 2. Why might not the Epistle be written to them all?
Penman of this Epistle is not so infallibly agreed upon by learned men. Some of old ascribed it to Luke, or Barnabas, or Clement, Euseb. Hist. l. 6. Platin. in vit. Petri, p. 10. and Hieronymus. Some to Barnabas, Tertullian. See Erasin. Annot. in Act. 1. p. 199. Some to Apollos, Luther in Gen. 48. fol. 643. De Luc. Osiander in Praefat. ad Hebr. Calvin himselfe, though in his Argument, before [Page 242] this Epistle, he saith, he cannot be brought to think it was Pauls, yet after seems to incline to that opinion, that Paul wrote it, Calv. Com. in Heb. 13, 13. But that Paul was Penman of this Epistle, was the unanimous opinion of all the ancient Greek writers, (except Caius mentioned by Nicephorus l. 4. c. 34.) and of divers Latin Authors, ancient and moderne. See Gerh. loc. com. de Script. sacr. loc. 1. Exeges. Sect. 275. and D. Pareus Proem in ep. ad Hebr. Sect. 1. G. Whitaker disp. de sacr. script. q. 1. c. ult. That the Apostle Paul was Penman of this Epistle, may be evinced by divers considerable Arguments, As
- 1. All the Greek Copies of the Epistle to the Hebrews, (except one wherein the Title was only, [...] i. e. To the Hebrews) have this Title [...] i. e. The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews. Th. Bez. in Annot. ante ep. ad Hebr.
- 2. The Testimony of Peter is most considerable; As our beloved brother Paul also, according to the wisedome given unto [Page 243] him, hath written unto you. As also in all his Epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to be understood, &c. 2 Pet. 3.15, 16. wherein note with Gerh. Piscat. and others,
- 1. That Paul wrote to them also to whom Peter wrote, But Peter wrote to the Hebrews, both his Epistles, 1 Pet. 1.1, 2. 2 Pet. 3.1, 2. Therefore Paul wrote to the Hebrews, either this Epistle is that which Paul wrote to the Hebrews, or its lost. That it should be lost, is unlikely, when Gods providence hath preserved such a small Epistle, and of private concernment, as his Epistle to Philemon, for the use of the Church, but doubtlesse what Paul wrote to the Hebrews, was more large and full, and touching the mystery of salvation by Christ crucifyed, as most necessary to them who stuck too much to the Leviticall Priesthood, as if it should be perpetuated, and stumbled at Christ c [...]ucified; and this is the Argument of this Epistle.
- [Page 244]2. That Paul wrote to them of the same things that Peter wrote. Herein Peters Epistle, and this to the Hebrews, agree, as That by Christ are given to us, all things pertaining to life and godlinesse, 2 Pet. 1.3, 4. That Iesus Christ is the son of God in whom the father is well pleased with us, of whom the Prophets spoke, 2 Pet. 1.16, 17, 18.19. So these things are largely handled, Heb. 1.1. to c. 10.19 Peter exhorts them to faith and holinesse, 2 Pet. 1.5. to 16. and 3.1. to 15. So the Epistle to the Hebrews, c. 2, 1. to 5. and 3.1, 6. to the end and c. 4. and 6.11, 12. and c. 10, 19. to c. 13, 20▪ Peter shews the danger of Apostacy, 2 Pet. 2.20, 21, 22. So the Epistle to the Hebrews, c. 6, 4. to 9. and 10.26, to 32.
- 3. That Paul wrote wisely, much wisedome appears both in words, matter and method of this Epistle to the Hebrews.
- 4. That herein are some things hard to be understood, as about Apostates, [Page 245] Heb. 6. and Heb. 10. as about predestination, Rom. 9. c. 11. and Eph. 1.
- 3. Pauls zeale and affection was great to the Hebrews, Rom. 9.1, 2, 3, 4. &c. and can we thinke he should never write to them that were so exceeding deare to him, and what could he write more proper and necessary for them, then touching the abrogation of the Leviticall Priesthood, and the excellency of Christs person and office; which this Epistle treats of, above any other?
- 4. Mention is here made of Timothy his brother, and that he is set at liberty, Heb. 13.23. elsewhere Paul cals Timothy his brother, 1 Thes. 3. 2. Philem. 1. and in what account Timothy, (Pauls companion) was with Paul, See Annot. in 1 Tim. before.
- 5. The Author of this Epistle mentions his bonds, Heb. [...]0.34. and 13.23. and this is Pauls manner in his Epistles, Rom. 16.21. 1 Cor. 16.10, 11. 2 Cor. 1.1. Col. 1.1. 1 Thes. 1.1. and 3.2. 2 Thes. 1. 1. Philem. 1.9.10.
- [Page 246]6. The character of the stile and language in this Epistle, seems so plainly to be the same with Pauls in his other Epistles, that they indigitate Paul to be the Penman Well consider and parallel the ensuing places.
- Heb. 1, 2, 3.—with Col. 1.14, 15, 16, 17.
- Heb. 5, 12, 13.—with 1 Cor. 3.1, 2.
- Heb. 9.15.—with Rom. 3.25.
- Heb, 10.34.—with Phil. 1.13. and Philem. v. 1, 9, 10.
- Heb. 10.34.—with 1 Thes. 2.14.
- Heb. 10.36.—with Gal 3.22.
- Heb. 11.11, 12.—with Rom. 4.18, 19.
- Heb. 12.1.—with 1 Cor 9.24.
- Heb. 13.7.—with Philip. 2.25.29.
- Heb. 13.9.—with Eph. 4.14.
- Heb. 13.15, 16.—with Rom. 12.1, 2.
- Heb. 13.17.—with 1 Thes. 5.12, 13.
- Heb. 13.18 —with 2 Cor. 1.11, 12. Act. 23.1.24.16.
- Heb. 13.20, 21. — with 1 Thes. 5.23. Rom. 15.23. and 16.20. 2 Cor. 23.13. Phil. 49.
- 7. Finally, that which the Apostle himselfe counts as it were the character and seale of all his Epistles, his Token, 2 Thes. 3.17, 18. The Grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you all. Amen; is the valedictory close of this Epistle, Heb. 13.25.
[Page 247]These Arguments may strongly perswade that the Apostle Paul was Penman of this Epistle, and consequently, that this Epistle is of Apostolicall, yea of divine Authority, as well as his other Epistles. Nor are the objections usually brought to the contrary, of such difficulty, but that they may easily receive satisfactory Answers. And are answered by Bez. Pareus and Piscator in their Prologue before this Epistle. Gerh. exeges. loc. Com. 1. de script. sacr. cap. 10. Sect. 277. &c.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in former Table.
That it was not written in Hebrew by P [...]ul, an Hebrew to the Hebrews, and so translated into Greek, by Luke or Barnabas as some think, viz. Clem Alexan. S [...]rom. l. 4. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 3 [...]. Hieronym. in Catal. script. illustr. &c. But rather that Paul wrote this Epistle at first in Greek, may be probably believed upon these ensuing grounds, vid. Fran. Iunium paral. l. 3. in c. 9. hujus Epist. p. 479.
1. The stile and phrase of this Epistle [Page 248] seems rather to Grecize, then to Hebraize, there being fewer Hebraismes in this Epistle, then in Pauls other Epistles.
2. The places alledged out of the old Testament, are not alledged according to the Hebrew originall, but the Greek version of the LXXII.
3. The Hebrew names are interpreted, as Melchi-zedek, King of righteousnesse, and Salem, peace, Heb. 7.1, 2.
4. Most Iewes then understood the Greek tongue, especially those that lived in Asia Minor.
5. Peter and Iames wrote their Epistles to the dispersed Iewes in Greek, and Paul wrote all his other Epistles to the Gentiles in Greek; why then should we imagine this to be written in Hebrew?
6. The Ancient writers testifie not, that they have seen any originall Hebrew Copy of this Epistle.
Occasion, seemes to be the infirmity and affliction of the believing Hebrews. For the whole current of the Epistle, seems to intimate, That though [Page 249] they had entertained Christ, yet they adhered too much to Moses and the Leviticall Priesthood, and perhaps some of them had some hesitancy about Christ, whether he were the promised Messiah: and yet for their entertaining of Christ so farre as they did, they seem not only to be reproached by their Countreymen, as Apostates from the Law, but were greatly persecuted for Christ; the Apostle understanding this their s [...]ate, wrote to instruct and support them herein; vid. Athanas. in Synops.
Scope. For confirmation and comfort, of the weak and afflicted Hebrews, to evidence that Iesus Christ is true God and man, like us in all things, (only sin excepted,) and therefore the only true Messiah, promised in the Old Testament, and exhibited in the New; that he is the Churches only King, Prophet and Priest, able to save all that come to him to the uttermost, having by offering up himselfe once, for ever perfected them that are sanctified, and abrogated the Leviticall Priesthood and law, and therefore that they ought to believe in him, persevere in [Page 250] faith, and walk worthy of Christ and his Gospel.
Principall parts. to this end. This Epistle is partly Doctrinall, partly Practicall.
- I. Doctrinall and Informatory touching Christ himselfe, viz. In respect of
- 1. His Person; That he is 1. The eternall sonne of God, c. 1. 2. True man, taking flesh of the seed of Abraham, c. 2. And therefore his Doctrine to be more hearkned to then the word of Moses or Angels.
- 2. His Office, viz.
- 1. Propheticall, Wherein he farre surpassed Moses, whom therefore we must believe and obey lest we lose the eternall, as Israel the temporall Canaan c. 3, 4.
- 2. Sacerdotall or Priestly, wherein Christ is asserted by the Apostle, to be out great High-priest, To this end,
- 1. He compares him to Aaron in his call to his Office, c. 5.1. to 6.
- 2. He preferres him before Aaron, c. 5, 6. to 11, (and being to speake further of this mystery, by way of digression he taxes their dulnesse in understanding, and warnes them against Apostacy, c. 5.11. to the end, & c. 6.) Christ is preferred [Page 251] before Aaron, 1. In excellency of order, being of Melchisedeck's order, who was above Levi, Christ also being made of this order by an Oath, and that for ever. c. 7. 2. In Excellency of Sacrifice and Ministry beyond Aarons, he being Mediator of the New and lasting Covenant, the old being antiquated, c. 8. He entring into heaven, not an earthly Tabernacle, with his own blood, not blood of beasts; Once, and not often; hath purged the Conscience not onely the flesh; and this not for a season, but for ever c. 9, and 10, 1. to 19.
- 3. Regall in divers places.
- II. Practicall and Hortatory to Christians, Whom he exhorts
- 1. To Faith and constancy therein, 1. From the perill of Apostacy; and the great reward, c. 10.19. to the end. 2. From the cloud of faithfull examples to be followed, c. 11.
- 2. To divers Religious exercises. 1. To patience and constancy under the crosse, c. 12.1. to 14. 2. To Peace and holinesse, 14. to 18. 3. To entertainment of the Gospel, v. 18. to the end. 4. To Charity, c. 12.1, 2, 3. 5. To Marriage-chastity ver. 4. 6. To Contentment [Page 252] ver. 5.6. 7. To follow the Faith and constancy of their teachers, ver. 7. to 16, 8. To Benisicence, ver. 16. 9. To due respect to Church-governours ver. 17. And so concludes his Epistle ver. 18. to the end.
Thus of the Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the believing Hebrewes.
Now follow seven other Epistles, some of them evidently, the rest of them probably, written to believing Hebrews. viz. The Epistle of Iames, Jam. 1.1. The two Epistles of Peter; compare 1 Pet. 1.1, 2. with 2 Pet. 1.1.2. & 3.1. The first Epistle of Iohn seems probably written to al the believing Hebrews, especially in Asia Minor; for 1. the Greek title cals it a Catholique or generall Epistle Zanch. Prolegom. in 1 Ioan. Ep. p. 6, Bez. Annot. in 1 Ioan. Because generally written to al the Jewes. (Though some think it was written to the Parthians, among whom were many Jewes of the old Captivity and dispersion of the tenne Tribes, whence Parthians are thought to be named in the first place, Act. 2.9. Possilius in Indic. operum Augustin. August. l. 2. Q. Evang. c. 39.) 2. The [Page 253] very matter of the Epistle being directed against the blasphemous errou [...]s broached among the Iewes, especially those of Ebion and Cerinthus against the Divinity of Christ, seemes to imply that it was principally written to the Iewe [...]. The second Epistle of Iohn is to an Elect Lady, probably a believing Hebrew, of great wealth and worth. For he warns both her and her children of the Heresies and seducers that opposed the person of Christ after the manner of his first Epistle. And he intimates his intention of visiting them shortly. Gaius, [...]o whom he wrote his third Epistle, is not obscurely intimated there to be a believing Jew, 3 Ioh. v. 1, 2, 6, 7. As Piscat. in loc. notes. Finally the Epistle of Iude seemes written to the dispersed believing Iewes. 1 In the Greek title it being called Catholike or Generall. 2 And for the matter of it being of like nature with 2 of Pet. even as an Abstract of it; against the Seducers of those times, as the samenesse of words and phrase import.
These seven Epistles are by some called, Catholique; by some Canonicall.
[Page 254] Catholique, or Generall; not in respect of the universall concernment of the matters contayned in them, for such is the matter of Pauls Epistles also: but in respect of the parties to whom these Epistles are written, viz. Not to any particular Church, as the Epistle to the Romanes, Corinth, &c. Nor to particular persons as the Epistle to Timothy, Titus, Philemon: But generally to the believing Iewes dispersed in severall Countries. In this respect divers Latin, especially Greek writers call them Catholique, viz. Greek Scholiast. (as Bez. Annot. ante Epist. Iac. observes.) Origen apud Euseb. Hist. l. 6. c. 19. Dionys. Alexandrin. apud Euseb. l. 7. c. 20. Eusebiu [...] Hist. l. 2. c. 22. Cyril Hierosolym. Catech. 17. Hieronym▪ in Catal. Script. &c. Though properly the second and third Epistle of Iohn cannot be called Catholique, yet being joyned to Iohn's first Epistle, which is Catholique, by use they come to be so called, though abusively.
Canonicall; not that these seven Epistles onely, or peculiarly, among al [...] others are Canonicall and A [...]thentique; [Page 255] that were to derogate from other Epistles of Paul; but because they contain Canons or Rules of Christian life. Ger. loc. [...]om. exeg. loc. 1. c. 10. §. 291. Beza thinks they were by mistake called Canonicall (perhaps for Catholicall) for 1. why should not also Pauls Epistles be called Canonicall? 2. Greek writers do not so call them. 3. Latins have, though groundlesly, doubted of the authority of the Epistle of Iames, and second of Peter. Therefore its not probable they would call them Canonicall. Bez. Annot. ante Epist. Iacob. & D. Pareus in prolegom. in Epist. Iacobi.
James.
THe Catholique Epistle of JAMES the Apostle. So stiled in the Greek Copies. Bez.
Penman hereof was Iames. Iam. [...].1. Iames in Greek and Latine is the same with the Hebrew Iakob, which signifies A supplanter. Gen. 25.25.27. [Page 256] 36. But what Iames this was, is not so easily determined. There were three of that name (as some learned Authors are of opinion) two of them Apostles, and one of the 70 Disciples, viz. 1. Iames the sonne of Zebedee, brother to Iohn, Matth. 4.21.22. & 10.2. He was with Christ at his transfiguration, Mat. 17.1. He was called Iames the greater, either in respect of his age, or of his stature, or of his calling to the Apostleship. The Syriack interpreter seems to ascribe this Epistle to this Iames, as Tremellius renders it, Tres Epistolae, &c. i. e▪ Three Epistles of three Apostles before whose eyes our Lord did trans-figure himselfe, viz. Of Iames, Peter, and Iohn. But (as Pareus notes, Proem. in Epist. Iac.) the Kings edition translated by G. Fabritius hath it thus, In nomine Domini I [...]shua Meschicho sigillamus tres Epistolas: Iaakoub, & Petri, & Iouchanon. i. e. In the name of the Lord Iesus the Messiah, we Seale the three Epistles of Iames, and Peter, and Iohn. This speakes not particularly of Iames the greater. Besides, this Iames was pu [...] to death by Herod Agrippa, in the second [Page 257] yeare of Claudius. See Act. 12.1, 2. but this Epistle seemes to be writt [...]n afterwards to the convert Iewes dispersed, afte [...] Claudius had cast both Iewes and Christians out of the City of Rome, Act. 18.1, 2. Su [...]ton in Claud. c. 25.2. Iames the sonne of Alpheus, an Apostle also, Matth. 10.3. Act. 1.3. Brother of I [...]de, Iud. 1. Called sometimes Iames the lesse, for distinction from the former Iames, Mark. 15.40. and the brother of the Lord, Gal. 1.19. Matth. 13.55. Mark. 6.3. Either 1 because he was the sonne of Ioseph (the supposed Father of Christ) by a former wife, as divers both Greeke and Latin Fathers think See Iacob. Laurentii Com. in la. 1.1. p. 1 [...].12. Or rather [...] he is called the Lords brother (after the Hebrewes manner of speaking) because he was Cousin germane to him, his Mother being that Mary wife of Cleophas, (as some thinke) which was Sister to the blessed Virgin, Mark. 16.1. Hieronym. advers. He [...]uid. lib. Theodoret. in Epist. ad Gal. cap. 1. Ignatius thinks he was called the Lords Brother because he so exactly resembled Christ in countenance, and conversation, [Page 258] as if they had been twins, and that he was surnamed Iustus. Ignat. in Epist. 2 ad Ioan. Seniorem. This Iames is conceived to be Penman of this Epistle, it being most suitable to an Apostle of unlimited Commission to take care of all the Tribes dispersed. The matter of the Epistle becomes an Apostolicall Spirit. Nor (saith Pareus) doth any thing solidly contradict this opinion; who there answers objections against it. Therefore if the Epistle be Apostolicall, it is questionlesse of Divine Authority. 3. As for the third Iames called Oblias, of the number of the seventy Disciples, Bishop of Ierusalem, some question whether there were such an one; others count it most unlikly that he should be Penman of this Generall Epistle, that was confined him selfe to a Particular charge.
Occasion and Scope. Iames taking notice that the twelve Tribes dispersed were under great Temptations and tryalls of affliction; and also that too many among them contented themselves with a fruitlesse profession of Faith without the concurrent practice of Holinesse: [Page 259] w [...]ites unto them, principally to comfort and support them under their present sharp tryals and tribulations, Iam. 1.2. &c. 5.7, to 12. As also to exhort them to joyne good works and an holy life to their Faith, without which their Faith was but a dead carkasse, c. 2.14. to the end.
Principall parts. In this Epistle are,
- I. A superscription, c. 1.1.
- II. Substance of the Epistle, which is chiefly Hortatory (here and there some few Doctrinals being inserted.) They are exhorted, 1. To Patience and Prayer under the outward Tentations of the crosse c. 1.2, to 13. 2. To ascribe the inward Tentations to sin, to themselves, not to God, c. 1. ver. 13. to 19. 3. To right hearing of the word c. 1.19. to 26. 4. To true Religion and undefiled, c. 1.26, 27, 5. To avoid respect of persons, c. 2.1, to 14. 6. To joyn unto Faith the proper fruits of good-works, without which Faith is but false and dead, and not that Faith that justifieth, c. 2.14. to the end. 7. To avoid the sinfull abuses of the tongue, c. 3. 8. To restrain their corrupt lusts and the pernicious fruits thereof, c. 4.1, to 8. 9. To walk penitently and holily, c. 4. 8. to 13. 10. Not to undertake humane Actions [Page 260] with vaine confidence, but with dependence upon Gods providence, c. 4.13. to the end. 11. Not to abuse riches, &c. c. 5, 1. to 7. 12. That the Godly patiently beare the injuries of the rich, c. 5. vers. 7. to 12. 13. To take heed of all rash swearing, ver. 12. 14. To use Prayer, especially as an Antidote against afflictions, ver. 13. to 19. 15. To reduce an erring brother, ver. 19, 20.
I Peter.
THe first Catholique Epistle of PETER the Apostle. So called, partly in reference to the dispersed Jewes to whom generally this Epistle is directed (as was fore noted); partly in respect of Peter the Apostle Penman of it, 1 Pet. 1.1.
PETER [ [...]] a Greek name. Not the Proper name, but rather the Surname of this Apostle, Act. 10.5. His proper name was Simon, an Hebrew name [...] i. e. An hearer. From [...] To Heare. Act. 10.5. Ioh. 1.43. Christ surnamed him Peter. This surname was 1 Promised to him by Christ when he was first called to be Christs Disciple, [Page 261] Ioh. 1.43. 2. Given to him by Christ when he called him to the Apostleship, &c. Mark. 10.16. Luk. 6.14. 3. Confirmed to him by Christ also, upon Peters firme and excellent confession of Christ, Matt. 16.17. Peter in Greek is the same with Kephas or Kipha in Syriack, both signifie a Stone. Christ gave him this name by Anticipation, in reference to that firm and solid Confession of Faith touching Christ, which Peter should, yea did make; and on which Faith confessed, as on a Rock, Christ did promise to build his Church, &c. Matth. 16.16. &c. Which was fulfilled, Peter preaching the first Sermons whereby both Iewes and Gentiles were converted to Christ, and the first foundation of the Christian Church after Christ was laid, Act. 2.14. &c. 10 34. &c. Which was the Priviledge conferred by Christ upon Peter peculiarly above all the Apostles. Peter was the sonne of Iona, and brother of Andrew; by trade they were Fishers, whence Christ called them to be Fishers of men, Matth. 4.18. [...]eter had his notable Eminencies; As 1. [...] [Page 262] singular courage, zeale, and boldnesse for expressing himselfe, Matth. 26.3. Luke 22, 23. Act. 2.14. Hereupon counted one of the three pillers of the Primitive Church, Gal. 2.9. 2. He made that admirable Confession of Christ, Matth. 16.16. 3. He was one of the three which Christ took up into the Mount to see his glorious transfiguration, Matth. 17.1. &c. Mark. 9.2. Luk. 9.28. 4. He was one of the three which Christ took out from his Apostles to accompany him in his bitter Agony, Matth. 26.36, 37. &c. 5. Christ after his resurrection eminently restored him to the exercise of his Pastorall office, by his threefold profession of his sincere love to Christ, after his threefold denyall of Christ, Ioh. 21.15, 16, 17. He had also his remarkable Infirmities. 1. Inconsiderately cut off Malchus his Eare, Matth. 26.51. &c. 2. Self-confidently presumed against denying Christ, Matth. 26.31. to 36. 3. Shamefully denyed Christ thrice, and every time worse then other, Matth. 26.69, to 75▪ 4. And walked not with a right foot in the beginning of his Ministry, [Page 263] drawing the Gentiles to Iudaize among the Iewes, &c. Gal. 2.14. &c.
When and Whence this Epistle was written. It's more then probable Peter wrote this Epistle by Sylvanus to the Iewes of the dispersion while he was now at Babylon, 1 Pet. 5.12, 13. There was a Babylon in Chaldea, Psal. 137. A Babylon in Egypt. And in resemblance hereunto the mysticall Babylon, viz. Rome, Rev. 14.1. & 16.19. & 17.5. & 18.2▪ 10, 21. Now Papists themselves upon this place generally contend, that here by Babylon is meant Rome, that they may prove Peter was at Rome, Fenardent. in loc. But they forget how herein they confesse Rome to be that wicked Babylon destined to destruction, Rev. 17. and 18. Luther leaves every man to abound in his own sense which Babylon it was. Pareus thinks that Babylon in Chaldea is to be here understood, where Peter the Apostle of the Circumcision preached to the Iewes: and that no one reason can be given why Peter should conceale the name of Rome, had he intended Rome. D. Par. Com. in 1 Pet. 5.13. From that [Page 264] phrase, if any man suffer as a Christian, 1 Pet. 4.16. intimates that this Epistle was written after Antioch, had received the faith, for there the disciples were first called Christians, Act. 11.26. and it was about the same time, that Iames was crowned with Martyrdome, Act. 12.1, 2.
Occasion. The strangers that came up to Ierusalem at Pentecost, were many of them converted by Peters Sermon, and so baptized Acts 2. to whom therefore Peter here writes, as to new borne babes, 1 Pet. 2.2. weak, and as yet unsetled in the faith, and upon their returne into their owne countreys, much exercised for Christs sake with afflictions and crosses, as the current of the Epistle manifests.
Scope. That therefore the Apostle as a spirituall father, might confirme these his children in faith, against all troubles and persecution, he writes to them all this Epistle, assuring them, that the faith or doctrine of grace wherein they stood, was the true grace of God, and cons [...]quently he exhorts and stirs them up to persevere therein. To grow and abound [Page 265] in grace and godlinesse. This the great drift of both his Epistles, See 1 Pet. 5.12. and 2 Pet. 3.1. &c.
Principall parts of the Epistle to this end, are,
- I. The Inscription, c. 1, 1, 2.
- II. The Substance of the Epistle it selfe, which is principally Hortatory, in reference to that grace of God. He incites them, 1. To the constant exercise and improvement of that grace of God, whereby they are brought into a regenerate and sanctified state; and this concernes them all in their generall calling as Christians, c. 1, 3. to c. 2. v. 13. 2. To the due exercise of grace, in respect of their respective conditions and relations wherein they stand towards others. And this exhortation concernes them severally, according to their respective particular callings and conditions. viz. How 1. Subjects are to behave themselves towards magistrates, c. 2, 13. to 18. 2. Servants towards their masters, ver. 18. to end. 3. Wives towards their husbands, and husbands towards their wives, c. 3, 1. to 8. 4. All brethren towards one another, v. 8. 5. Distressed and afflicted ones towards oppressours and Persecutors, c 3, 9. to c. 5, 1. 6. Presbyters towards their flocks, and the younger towards the Elder, c. 5, 1. to middle of v. 5. 7. How all of [Page 266] them should carry themselves towards others, themselves, and God, v. 5. to 10. And so he sweetly closes up the whole series of his exhortations, with a patheticall prayer to the God of all grace, for their stablishment and perfection in grace after their short afflictions: concluding it with a gratefull doxology unto God, v. 10, 11.
- III. Conclusion of the Epistle, containing an intimation of his Scope in writing, salutations, and a valediction, c. 5, 12, 13, 14.
II Peter:
THe II. Catholique Epistle of PETER the Apostle. The Apostle himselfe cals this his Second Epistle. He writes it to the same people, to whom he wrote his first, viz. To the believing Jews dispersed, and in effect to the same end, 2 Pet. 3.1, 2. and 1.12, 13, 14, 15.
Some few writers have doubted of the Authority of this Epistle, (as also of that of Iames, of the second and third of Iohn, and of the Epistle of Iude,) as Eusebius [Page 267] intimates, Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 22. Hieronym. in Catal. vir. illustr. in Petro. Nor is it found in the Syriack version.
B [...]t divers cogent Arguments perswade us that this is an Apostolicall Epistle, and written by Peter, As 1. The inscription mentions the same Penman of this Epistle with the first, viz. Simon Peter a servant and an Apostle of Iesus Christ. 2 Pet. 1.1. He that wrote this Epistle, testifies, that he must shortly put off this his Tabernacle, as our Lord Iesus Christ hath shewed him, 2 Pet. 1.14. to whom did Christ shew this but to Peter? Iohn 21.17. 3. He that wrote this Epistle, was with Christ upon the Mount at his transfiguration, beheld his majesty, —and heard that voice of the father from heaven, when he was with Christ on the holy Mount, This is my beloved sonne in whom I am well pleased, 2 Pet. 1.16, 17, 18. Now there were only three, viz. Peter, Iames and Iohn in the Mount with Christ, at his transfiguration, Matth. 17.1, 2. therefore it must be written by one of them three, (and by whomsoever of [Page 268] them, it is of Apostolicall, yea of divine Authority,) but unto Iames or Iohn none ever yet ascribed it, nor is there any reason so to do, but many to the contrary: therefore it must needs be confessed to be written by Peter. 4. He that writes this Epistle, cals it his Second Epistle, and intimates he wrote them both to the same persons, viz. the dispersed believing Jews. compare 2 Pet. 1.1. and 3.1. with 1 Pet. 1.1. 5. He that wrote this Epistle cals Paul his beloved brother, commends him, and approves the Authority of his Epistles, 2 Pet. 3.15, 16. which were too much for any, but for an Apostolicall pen. 6. An holy Apostolicall spirit breathes throughout this whole Epistle, both in his exhortations to holy duties, monitions against false-teachers and Apostacy, and predictions of things to come. 7. The stile and phrase Apostolicall and consonant enough to that of Peters first Epistle. Hist. Magd. Cent. 1. l. 2. c. 4. 8. To all these may be added the consent of ancient Writers, that count this Epistle Canonicall and Apostolicall, Concil. Laodicen. Can. 59. Carthaginens. [Page 269] 3. Athanas. in Synops. Damascen. l. 4. c. 18. Epiphan. Heres. 76. August. l. 2. De Doctrin. Christian. c. 8. And Beda in Comment. wonders how any should doubt of the Authority of this Epistle, when the Penman hath put his name in the beginning, and testifies he was with the Lord in the holy mount.
So that this Epistle is of unquestionable authority.
Peter made this Epistle a little before his death, 2 Pet. 1.14.
Occasion & Scope. Peter considering, that shortly he must put off the Tabernacle of his body 2 Pet. 1.14. that some were too negligent of making their calling and election sure; that there then were, and afterwards would be false teachers and seducers in the Church, and scoffers against the second comming of Christ; Therefore Peter wrote this Epistle to stirre them up, by putting them in remembrance of those things which had been preached among them, 2 Pet. 1.12, 13, 14. & 3.1, 2. specially inciting them to progresse in grace, to watchfulnesse against false teachers and scoffers, and to a preparednesse for the comming of [Page 270] Christ, as the whole current of the Epistle evidences.
Principall parts.
- I. Inscription of the Epistle, c. 1, 1, 2.
- II. Substance of the Epistle, which is 1. Hortatory, exhorting them to progresse and perseverance in grace and piety, c. 1. 2. Monitory, warning them to take heed of those hereticall and blasphemous seducers which should creep into the Church, threatning destruction to them, c. 2. 3. Propheticall, foretelling of sensuall scoffers against Christs comming in the last days: and of the day of judgement, the new heavens and new earth; whereunto they should prepare themselves by piety, c. 3, 1. to 17.
- III. Conclusion of the Epistle, with a summary recitall of his former exhortations, and with a doxology unto our Lord Jesus Christ, c. 3, 17, 18.
I John.
THe first Catholique Epistle of JOHN the Apostle. This Epistle hath this Title in all the ancient manuscript Copies. Bez. Annot. ante hanc [Page 271] Ep. Which as Beza there well advertiseth us, we are thus to understand, viz. The first Epistle of Iohn the Apostle which is Catholick; for of all Iohn's Epistles, this only is Catholique or Generall, the other two being particular. viz. The 2d to the Elect Lady and her children; The 3d to Gaius, and therefore it were improper to call it the first Generall Epistle in any other sense.
Penman of this Epistle, is Iohn the Apostle, as is evident. 1. From the Greek Title, [...] i. e. The first Catholique Epistle of John the Apostle; thus all ancient Greek Copies have it. Bez. 2. From his manner of speaking of Christ, asserting his divinity in divers passages of this Epistle, as 1 Iohn 1.1, 2. & 2.22.23, 24. & 5.5, 6, 7. &c. and calling him the Word 1 Iohn 1.1. and 1 Iohn 5.7. Iohn being most sublime in asserting the Godhead of Christ, Iohn 1.1, 2, 3. &c. and Rev. often; and no writers in the New Testament, stiling Christ the Word but Iohn in his Gospel, Iohn 1.1, 14. in his Revelation, Rev. 1.2. and 19.13. and here in this Epistle. [Page 272] 3. From that eminent and singular Character of Iohns spirit. viz. The spirit of love, most predominant and conspicuous all along this Epistle, as in his Gospel and Revelation. Iohn was the disciple whom Jesus loved above all his disciples. Iohn 13.23. & 19.26. and 20.2. and 21.7, 20. He was a meer compound of sweetest love; in all his writings, breaths nothing in a manner but love ▪ Hence excellently Calvin, Haec Epistola, prorsus digna est ejus discipuli spiritu, qui prae aliis ideò a Christo dilectus fuit, ut ipsum nobis familiarem redderet. i. e. This Epistle is altogether worth the Spirit of that disciple, which was therefore beloved of Christ above the rest, that he might render him familiar unto us. Calv. Argum. in 1. Ioan. Of Iohn, see more in Annot. on Gosp. of Iohn. Iohn therefore being the undoubted Penman of this Epistle, it is of unquestionable Authority, Eusebius and Hieronymus testify, That there never was doubt in the Church about the Author or Authority of this Epistle. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 25. Hieronym, in Catalog. Augustin cals it satis dulcem & satis memorabilem in Ecclesia dei, quód in [Page 273] ipsa charitas maximé commendetur. i. e. A most sweet Epistle and most memorable in the Church of God, because love is especially commended therin. Aug. Praef. in 1. Ioan. Ep. and saith that orbem ter [...]arum ipsa edificavit, i. e. It hath edified the world, Aug. Tract. 7.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, Iohn wrote his Gosp. at Ephesus, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. advers. haeres. This Epistle seemes to be written after his Gospel. He wrote it when he was now old; thinks Hierome. And being old, he departed not from Asia, therefore is probable he wrote it at Ephesus, Zauch. Prolegom. in 1. Ioan. p. 6. Iohn lived after the other Apostles and wrote after them.
Occasions. I. Iohn observed that in his daies there were many hereticall Teachers, Seducers, which he cals Anti-christs, (and by a propheticall spirit foresaw that afterwards there would arise many more.) Epiphanius reckon [...] up these before and in Iohn's dayes, viz. 1. Simonians. 2. Menandrians. 3. Saturnilians. 4. Basilidians. 5. Nicolaitanes▪ of whom Rev. 2. 6. Gnosticks. 7. Carpocratians, [Page 274] from Carpocrates in Asia; who taught men must sinne, and do the will of all the devils; otherwise they could not enter into heaven. 8. Cerinthians and Merinthians, from Cerinthus and Morinthus, who denyed Christs divinity, said he was not before Mary, that he was a meere man. 9. Habionits, who held the same heresie. 10. Nazaraei, that urged Moses law, See Epiphan. in Panario. l. 1. Tom. 2. II. Iohn took notice of divers carnall believers, who made great profession of knowledge, faith and piety towards God, who yet lived ungodly to the scandall of the Gospel. III. Finally, Iohn considered how necessary it was to encourage true believers in faith, and promote them to assurance of their interest in eternall life. These gave Iohn Occasion of writing this Epistle by way of remedy.
Scope. The blessed Apostle Iohn in this Epistle principally levels at these three ends.
- 1. To detect and confute hereticall and Anti-Christian Seducers, and warne the believers against them and their false Doctrine. [Page 275] These things have I written to you, concerning them that seduce you 1 John 2.26. particularly and especially proving, That Christ is true and eternall God, against Corinthians and Hebionites, c. 1. That Christ is true man, and assumed true flesh, against Cerdonians, Manichees, Priscillianists and Valentinians, (which by a Propheticall spirit, he foresaw would follow,) c. 4. That Iesus is the true Christ, the promised Messiah against Iew [...] and Nazarites, c. 2. That the Father, Word and holy Ghost, are three true distinct Persons, of one essence; against Sabelli [...]ns, &c. c. 5. That they that are born of God ought not, nay, as such, cannot commit sin; and such as do not righteousnesse are of the devill, not of God, against the Carpocratians, c. 3.
- 2. To stirre up all that professe to know God and believe in him, that they walk in light, not in darknesse, 1. Iohn 1.5, 6, 7. as Christ walked, that they keep the Commandements, especially abound in love, 1 Iohn 2.4, 5, 6. and all along the Epistle.
- 3. To provoke true believers to growth in faith and grace; and to help forward [Page 276] their assurance of their interest in eternall life.
This last end is clearly professed in 1 Iohn 5.13. These things have I written unto you, that believe on the name of the Sonne of God, that yee may know that yee have eternall life.— And therefore it is most singularly observable of this sweet and precious Epistle, what a multitude of Marks, Signs or Discoveries of believer's spirituall State, are here plainly and purposely laid downe for this end, more then in any other so short a piece of Scripture in the whole Bible. Which Signes are here reduced to severall heads, and set downe for the help and comfort of the Readers, in some of which, at least the weakest (if a sincere Christian▪) may find abundant soule-refreshing, and heart-establishment.
- I. Evidences, Signes or Discoveries of Gods love to us.
- 1. Christs being sent to lay down his life for us, that we might live by him, 1 Iohn 3.16. and 4.9, 10.
- 2. Adoption, That we should be called the sonnes of God, 1 Iohn 3.1.
- [Page 277]3. Our not loving the world, nor the things of the world inordinately, 1 John 2.15, 16, 17.
- 4. Our love to God, which is an effect, or reflexive beame of Gods love to us, 1 Iohn 4.19.
- II. Evidences or Signes of our Regeneration, Sonneship, &c.
- 1. That the world knoweth us not, 1 Iohn 3.1.
- 2. True believing that Jesus is the Christ, 1 Iohn 5.1.
- 3. Not committing sin, 1 Iohn 3.9. and 5.18. Especially in respect of that great sin of sins, The wicked one toucheth him not, 1 John 5.18.
- 4. Hope (if not assurance) that we shall be conforme to God in his glorious appearing, 1 Iohn 3.2, 3.
- 5. In hope of glory, purifying our selves as God is pure, 1 Iohn 2.3.
- 6. Overcoming erroneous hereticall spirits, 1 Iohn 4.1, 4.
- 7. Overcoming the world by faith, 1 Iohn 5.4, 5.
- 8. Doing of righteousnesse, 1 Iohn 2.29. and 3.10.
- 9. True love of the brethren, 1 Iohn 3.10.14. and 4.7.
- III. Evidences or Signes that [Page 278] we are of the truth, of the true number of Gods people.
- 1. Having an unction from the holy one teaching us all things, 1 Iohn 2.19, 20, 27.
- 2. The Testimony of an upright heart or conscience, 1 Iohn 3.19, 20, 21.
- 3. Perseverance with the faithfull in Christ and the truth 1 Iohn 2.19.27.
- IIII. Evidences or Signes of being in light, not in darknesse; in life, not in death.
- 1. Having the Sonne, 1 Iohn 5.11.12.
- 2. Loving, and not hating our brother, 1 Iohn 2.9, 10, 11. and 3.14, 15.
- V. Evidences or Signes of the true knowledge of God.
- 1. Keeping his Commandements, 1 Iohn 2.3, 4.
- 2. Denyall of sinne, 1 Iohn. 3.6.
- 3. Mutuall love of one another, 1 Iohn 4.7, 8.
- VI. Evidences or Signes of our love to God and Iesus Christ.
- 1. The casting out of base feare, 1 Iohn 4.18.
- 2. Not loving the world, and things in the world inordinately, 1 Iohn 2.15.16.
- [Page 279]3. Keeping of his Commandements and his Word chearfully, 1 Iohn 2.5. and 5.3.
- 4. Opening our bowels of compassion to brethren in need, 1 Iohn 3.17. and 1 Iohn 5.1. 1 Iohn 4.11, 12, 20, 21.
- VII. Evidences or Signes of our Communion with God and Iesus Christ.
- 1. His spirit given us, 1 Iohn 3.24. and 4.13.
- 2. The Truth's abiding in us, 1 Iohn 2.24.
- 3. Confessing that Jesus is the Son of God, 1 Iohn 4.15.
- 4. Not doing sinne 1 Iohn 3.6, 8.
- 5. Love to God and dwelling therein, 1 Iohn 4.16.
- 6. Walking in light, not in darknesse. 1 Iohn 1.5, 6 7.
- 7. Walking as Christ walked, 1 Iohn 2.6.
- 8. Keeping his Words and Commandements, 1 Iohn 2.3, 4, 5. and 3.23, 24.
- 9. Brotherly love, 1 Iohn. 4.12.
- VIII. Finally, Evidences or Signs of true brotherly love, or love of Gods children. 1 Joh. 5.1▪2.
- 1. Knowing of God, 1 Iohn 4.7, 8.
- [...][Page 280]2. Loving of God, 1 Iohn 5.1, 2.
- 3. Keeping Gods Commandements, 1 Iohn 5.2.
- 4. Not loving in word and in tongue, but in deed and in truth, 1 Iohn 3.18.
- 5. Reall compassion to our brother in need, yea even hazzarding our life for him in some cases 1 Iohn 3.16, 17.
By these Evidences, Signes or Characters of our spirituall Estate, clearly laid downe in this Excellent Epistle, the weak in faith may become strong in Assurance, and the strong may become stronger: yea all that truly believe in the name of the Son of God, (if the fault be not their owne) may hereby come to know, that they have eternall life. All which Evidences I shall indeavour very shortly (God willing,) more fully to open and unfold in a distinct Treatise, called, ☞ Believers Evidences for eternall life. A subject which, I hope, to gracious hearts will be most welcome and seasonable, in these sad afflicting dayes; To help forward their Assurance for heaven, when they can have no assurance of any thing on earth,
Principall parts. in reference to these excellent ends are.
- [Page 281]I. The Proem to the whole Epistle, declaring, 1. What the Apostle treats of. viz. Of Christ the word of life. viz. His person, God-man: and his office. 2. What he is about to say of Christ; not any novelty, but what was from the beginning; not any uncertainty, but that whereof they were infallible witnesses. 3. To what purpose he will treat of these things, that they may have Communion with God, and so their joy be full, they become happy, c. 1.1.2.3, 4.
- II. The Substance of the Epistle it selfe, which is either,
- 1. Practicall, full of heavenly exhortations. viz.
- 1. To holinesse of life and conversation. viz. 1. Not to walk in darknesse, but in light, c. 1. v. 5, 6, 7. 2. Not to deny sin to be in us, but penitently to confesse it, c. 1, 8, 9, 10. 3. To avoid sinne, and yet if sinne overtake us to repaire to Christ our Propitiation c. 2, 1, 2. 4. To adde to our knowledge of God, true obedience to his Word, c. 2, 3. to 9. 5. To brotherly love, c. 2, 9. to 15. 6. To take heed of inordinate love of the world. c. 2, 15, 16, 17,
- 2. To beware of the dangerous Anti-Christs, and hereticall Seducers, abounding [Page 282] in the world, especially [...]orinthians and Ebionites denying Christs Godhead, c. 2, 18. to the end.
- 3. To abandon practising of sinne, as inconsistent with the state of grace, contrary to the wicked seducements of the Carpocratians forementioned, who taught men to sin, c. 3, 1. to 11.
- 4. To sincere reall brotherly love, by many Arguments, c. 3, 11. to the end. and c. 4, 7. to the end.
- 5. To take heed of believing every spirit, but to try them, especially such as deny Christs Manhood, (as after did the Cerdonians, Manich [...]es, Priscillianists and Valentinians,) c. 4, 1. to 7.
- 2. Dogmaticall, wherein he asserts that Iesus is the Christ the Son of God, and true man, and this from divers Arguments and Testimonies which we should believe, that we may have eternall life begun, c. 5, 1. to 14. for perfecting whereof we should pray; where he directs us how, and for whom to pray, c. 5.14. to 21.
- III. Conclusion, with a serious monition against idolatry, c. 5, 21.
II John.
THe second Epistle of JOHN the Apostle. This Epistle of Iohn is nor, as the first, Catholique or Generall: but Particular, being written to particular persons, viz. The Elect Lady, and her children. Who she was, is not known; Some think that ELECT was her prop [...]r name: but that's improbable, for then Iohn would not have said, To the Elect Lady; but, To the Lady ELECT. Some turne this into an Allegory, and say that by the Elect Lady Iohn intended the whole Christian Church: But this is most unlikely, and plainly repugnant to this Epistle it selfe, for, 1. To write to the whole Christian Church under the Notion of an Elect Lady is so unusuall, that we find no such thing done in all the New-Testament. 2. This Epistle not onely mentions this Lady and her children, v. 1.4. But also sends her salutations from the children of her Elect [Page 284] Sister, v. 13. 3. The Apostle speakes of his intention to come and see her, and speake face to face. Which cannot be understood of the whole Christian Church, ver. 12. She is thought to be some eminent religious Matron of great Estate, who much relieved and supported the members of the Church in her dayes. Bez. Annot. in 2 Ioan. Piscat. in 2 Ioan.
Penman. Some thinke was another Iohn then the Apostle, as is testifyed by Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 39. But this seems to be a plain mistake, for 1. The Greek Copies call it in the Title, The second Epistle of Iohn the Apostle. 2. The matter of the Epistle is not only Divine and Apostolicall; but notably owns Iohn to be the writer, wherein Christian love, walking in the truth, and taking heed of Seducers and Antichrists, are pressed as in the first Epistle of Iohn. So that this is Iohns genuine language. Compare these passages among others, viz. 1 Ioh. 2▪ 7. with 2 Ioh. 5. — and 1 Ioh. 2.23. with 2 Ioh. 9. — and 1 Ioh. 4.1, 2, 3. with 2 Ioh. 7. — and 1 Ioh. 5.3. with 2 Ioh. [Page 285] 6. &c. 3. The Salutation is plainly Apostolicall. ver. 1, 2, 3. And notably relisheth of Iohn's Spirit. 4. Both ancient and modern Writers, account this Epistle Canonicall, and ascribe it unto Iohn the Apostle, Concil. Carthagin. 3. Can. 4.7. Concil. Laodic. c. ult. Hieronym, in Epist. 85. ad Euagrium. August. de Doctrin. Christian, l. 2. c. 8. Sentent. Episcoporum Concil. Carthaginens. apud Cyprian. Sent. 81. Cyprian op. edit. 1593. p. 449. Beda. Piscat. Bez. in 2 Iohan. So that this Epistle being written by Iohn the Apostle, is of unquestionable authority.
Occasion. Some thinke that Iohns familiar Christian acquaintance with this Elect Lady, gave him Occasion of writing this Epistle. Others rather think it was written against the Antichristian Heresie of Basilidis and his followers, who taught that Christ was not a true man but a phantasm, and therfore that he neither did, nor suffer'd those things which he is said to do and suffer. Epiphan. Heres. 24. Compare 2 Ioh. 7.
Scope. To incite the Elect Lady and her children, To persevere in the truth, [Page 286] and carefully to shun all hereticall Seducers, that bring not Christs Doctrine. A [...] also to adorne the truth, with love and good workes.
Principall parts. To this end, are,
- I. The inscription of the Epistle, containing▪ 1. The writer. 2. Persons written to. 3. A testification of the Apostle's and other's sincere love to the Lady and her children. 4. His pious wish o [...] supplication for them, ver. 1, 2, 3.
- II. The substance of the Epistle, wherein the Apostle, 1. Congratulates with the Lady, that some of her children walked in the truth, ver. 4. 2. Exhorts to constancy in the ancient Doctrine of love and truth, ver. 5, 6. 3. Warnes them against Seducers, denying Christs incarnation, shewing the danger of them, and forbidding all fellowship with them, ver. 7. to 12.
- III. The conclusion of the Epistle with, 1. Intimation that he omits writing many other things, hoping to come to them and speak them by word of mouth, verse 12. 2. Salutations from her Sisters children, ver. 13.
III John.
THe third Epistle of IOHN the Apostle. This Epistle is not Generall, but Particular; written to Gaius.
Penman of this Epistle, also was Iohn the Apostle, and therefore it is Authentique and Canonicall. Both these are ev [...]dent by all the foure Reasons alleadged touching Iohn's second Epistle. And the word, phrases, and method of these two Epistles harmoniously agree, as an in [...]entive Reader may well observe. Iohn directs this Epistle, To the well-beloved Gaius, but what Gaius this was is not so evident. Scripture mentions three persons of this name, viz. 1. Gaius of Macedonia, Act. 19.21, 2. Gaius of Derbe, Act. 20.4. 3. Gaius of Corinth, 1 Cor. 1.14. Whom Paul cals, Gaius mine host, and of the whole Church, writing from Corinth to the Romanes. Rom. [Page 288] 16.23. This Gaius was a man eminent for Hospitality, especially to the Ministers and members of the Church of Christ. Perhaps this Gaius of Corinth was the Gaius to whom here Iohn also writes, for 1. He is singularly commended here for his charity and hospitality, 3 Ioh. ver. 5, 6. 2. The consent of writers subscribes hereunto. See Lorin. Comment. in 3 Iohan. Epist. ver. 1. However he was a very eminent man in the Church.
When or where this Epistle was written, is not certainly known.
Occasion. The bountifulnesse and Hospitablenesse of Gaius, which Iohn had some occasion to improve towards some Ministers that went to preach to the Gentiles, who seeme to have brought this Epistle from Iohn to Gaius, See ver. 6, 7, 8.
Scope, To request Gaius, according to his wonted bounty and benevolence to the Saints, to bring forward on their journey certain Ministers that went to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles. To brand Diotrephes, and commend to him Demetrius.
[Page 289] Principall parts.
- I. The Inscription, mentioning, 1. Who wrote this Epistle. 2. To whom. 3. The wel-wishing Prayer for him, verse 1, 2.
- II. The Substance of the Epistle, which is partly,
- 1. Gratulatory, wherein he rejoyceth at Gaius his 1. W [...]lking in the truth, ver. 3, 4. 2. Charity and Hospitality to the Brethren and strangers, ver. 5, 6.
- 2. Hortatory, wherein by divers Arguments insinuated, he exhorts him to bring on their journey certaine brethren that went to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles, ver. 6, 7, 8. Intimating that he wrote to the Church about this matter also, but feares it would be to little effect, because of Diotrephes his pride, contemning the Apostle; neither receiving the brethren himselfe, nor suffering others to do it, whom therefore he threatens, ver. 9, 10, 11. But contrariwise commends Demetrius, ver. 13.
- III. Conclusion of the Epistle, with 1. An Apology for his writing so short an Espistle, because he trusted shortly to see him. 2. Salutations, ver. 13, 14.
Jude.
THe Catholique (or generall) Epistle of the Apostle JUDAS. Thus denominated, from the Penman who wrote it, and from the persons to whom it was written, viz. the same to whom Peter wrote his second Epistle; For substance being both the same.
Penman. Iudas the brother of Iames, Jud. 1. This is Originally an Hebrew name, viz. [...] Iehudah, i. e. Praise; from [...] Hodah, i. e. He hath confessed, he hath praised. This name was first given to the fourth sonne of Iakob, because at his birth his mother praised the Lord. Gen. 29.35. Matth. 2.6. There were two Apostles that had this name, viz. 1. Iudas Iscariot that had the bag, and betrayed Christ, Matth. 10.4. And afterwards in some sort repented, Restored the thirty peeces, hanged himselfe, Matth. 27.3, 4, 5. So that he burst asunder in the middest, and [Page 291] all his bowels gushed out, and so he went to his own place, Act. 1.18, 25. 2. Iudas the brother of Iames, Luk. 6.16. Act. 1.13. viz. Of Iames the sonne of Alpheus, who was famous at Ierusalem among the Apostles, Act. 15. And 21.28. Where he is conceived to keep his chief abode, that he might teach the Iewes that resorted thither out of all Nations; unto which Iewes especially Iudas here seemes principally to write, and therefore mentions Iames. Bez. Annot. in Iud. 1. This Iudas is also called Lebbeus, i. e. Hearty; and surnamed Thaddaeus which is in Syriack the same with Iudas in Hebrew, Matth. 10.3. This Iudas is supposed to preach the Gospel in Mesopotamia, Pontus, Aegypt and Persia, where the Magi slew him for his free and faithfull reproving of their superstitions.
Authority of this Epistle, (though suspected heretofore by some, and that upon very inconsiderable grounds; Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 2. c. 23. Yet) is now generally acknowledged to be Divine; especially considering that, 1. Iudas the brother of Iames, one of the [Page 292] Apostles wrote it, Iude 1. 2 Pet. 1.21. 2. The matter of it, yea and most of the very phrases and words, are the same with those of the second Epistle of Peter, if diligently compared. See the Parallel by P. Pareus Com. in Iude. 3. Antiquity have received this Epistle as Authentique, and part of the Divine Canon. Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 2. c. 23. and lib. 3. c. 22. Hieronym. in Catal. vir Illustr. Concil. Laodicens. Concil. Carthaginens. Athanasus, Augustine and others who recite the Catalogue of the Books of Scripture, reckon Iudes Epistle among the rest.
Arguments or Objections to the contrary are invalid. These the principall.
Object. 1. This Epistle recites Histories no where else to be found in Scripture, as the contending of Michael the Archangel, with the Devil about the body of Moses, Iude 9.
Answ. 1. Divers stories are pointed at in New Testament. Which we find not in the Old Testament. As that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses, 2. Tim. 3.8. That at Mount Sinai, Moses said, I exceedingly feare and quake, [Page 293] Heb. 12.21. Shall therefore these Epistles Authority be suspected? 2. These stories (though formerly unwritten, but happily derived by tradition from hand to hand, yet) now are written by guidance of the Spirit of God. And the writing of them rather assures us of the truth of these Histories, then detracts from the Authority of the Books wherein they are recorded. 3. This story hath some footsteps in Deut. 34.9. Whereupon some say, The Angel would have buried Moses, but the Devil challenged Moses to be his own, because of his killing the Aegyptian, and therefore withstood him. But others better; God knowing Israels pronenesse to Idolatry, least they should commit Idolatry with Moses dead body (as after they did with the brazen Serpent) buried him no man knowing where, and the Devil, endeavouring to discover it, the Angell withstood him.
Obj. 2. Iude mentions the Prophesie of Enoch, ver. 14, 15. The Old Testament hath no such Prophecie.
Ans. 1. Some thinke in Iudes time there was a Canonicall Book of Enoch [Page 294] extant, as Tertull. lib. de Habit muliebr. Beda com. in Ep. Iud. 2. Others say better then they, suppose Enoch's Book were Apocryphall, yet in Apocryphall Books ther's some truth, and why may not this Apostle alleadge this passage out of Enochs Prophecie, without approving that whole Book, or disvesting this Epistle of its Authority; as well as the Author to the Hebrew, alleadge some passages out of the Book of Maccabees, Heb. 11. Or Paul some Sentences out of Heathen Authors and Poets, 1 Cor. 15.32. Tit. 1.12. Act. 17.28. 1 Tim. 2.12. & 5.23. Tit. 1.3. 3. Others think this Prophecy of Enoch was rather reall then verball, viz. Respecting the Order of the Patriarchs, that as Death by reason of sinne had Reigned over the six first Fathers, Adam Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalelel, Iared, but could not touch the seventh, Enoch: so death shall Reigne ove [...] the world 6000 yeeres, (which shall so long continue) but in the 7000. yeeres, eternall life shall begin; and death shall be swallowed up in Victory. 4. But others best of all understand here, as the Text seems [Page 295] evidently to carry it, Enochs verbal Prophecie, which though not written, yet Iude received by Tradition, or rather by Revelation of the same spirit of God by which Enoch prophecyed, and here recorded as part of the Divine Canon.
Obj. 3. Jude alleadges other Apostles sayings, ver. 17. Therefore seemes rather to be a Disciple of the Apostles, then an Apostle himselfe, especially seeing he cals not himselfe an Apostle, but the servant of Jesus Christ, ver. 1. And therefore this Epistle not authenticall.
Ans. 1. Though it could be proved Iude was no Apostle, yet it therefore followes not, his Epistle is not Authenticall. Mark and Luke, not Apostles, yet the three Books they wrote are of unquestionable authority. The authority of Books of Scriptur are not from the Penmen writing them, but from the Spirit of God inditing them. 2. Daniel cites Ieremiah, Dan. 9.2. Ezekiel cites Daniel, Ezek. 14.19. Were they therefore not Prophets, but Prophets Disciples? Peter alleadgeth Pauls Epistles, 2 Pet. 3.15, 16. Was Peter therefore no Apostle but onely a [Page 296] Disciple? 3. Iudes alleadging the other Apostles deroga [...]es not from the authority of his Epistle, but proves that Iude wrote after both Paul and Peter, in whose Epistle these predictions are extant, 1 Tim. 4.1. &c. 2 Tim. 3.1. 2 Pet. 2.1. &c. 4. Finally, though Iudas here call not himselfe an Apostle, that argues not therefore he was not an Apostle. Iames in his Epistle, Iohn in his three Epistles, Paul in his Epistle to the Philippians, and in both his Epistles to the Thessalonians superscribe not themselves Apostles ▪ were they therefore no Apostles? But Iudas here stiles himselfe the brother of Iames, and that's full as much as if he had stiled himselfe an Apostle, for the texts are expresse that Iudas the Brother of Iames was one of the twelve Apostles. See Luk. 6.16. Act. 1.13.
Obj. 4. But Iude the Apostle taught in Persia, and therefore had he written this Epistle, he would rather have written it in the Persian, then Grecian tongue.
Ans. 1. Its not infallibly certain that Iude was in Persia when he wrote this Epistle. 2. No necessity of the [Page 297] Apostles writing in the language of the people with whom they then lived. Matthew lived among the Ethiopians, Paul at Rome when he wrote some of his Epistles, yet they wrote not in Ethiopick or Latin, but in Greek. Greek being then the most common language in the world, the Holy Ghost would have Greek to be the Originall language for New Testament, as the Hebrew especially for the Old. And Iudes Epistle is Catholique or Generall, and therefore was written in Greek the generall tongue.
When and Where this Epistle was written is uncertaine. Some think this Apostle was in Persia, or Asia Minor when he wrote it, viz. A yeere before he dyed, and that he there dyed, anno 68. after Christ. Niceph. l. 4. c. 40.44. Probably he wrote after both Paul and Peter, to whose writings he seems to have reference, v. 17. the whole Epistle is as an Abstract of Peters second Epistle.
Occasion, seems from the current of the Epistle, to be those abominable heresies of the Simonians, Nicolaitanes, Gnosticks, &c. abounding in those times [Page 298] times who held Sin to be indifferent, womē & al things to be common, &c. Oecumen. Epiphan. in Haeres. Gnostic. Sec. Iud. 3.4.
Scope. To warne all the faithfull in those times of the cursed and detestable Hereticks and Seducers that were cunningly crept in among them, that they contend earnestly for the truth against all their damnable errours and Heresies; and for purity and holinesse of life, against all their impure lustfull licentious and ungodly p [...]actices. Iude 3, 4, 8, 10, 20, 21.
Principall parts. To this end are,
- I. Inscription of the whole Epistle, expressing, 1. Penman who wrote this Epistle. 2. Parties to whom it was written. 3. The Salutation of them, ver. 1, 2.
- II. The substance of the Epistle, wherein are laid down,
- 1. The maine Proposition or Exhortation, To contend earnestly for the Faith once delivered to the Saints ver. 3. There being so many lascivious hereticall men crept in among them, ver. 4.
- 2. Arguments enforcing this exhortation upon them, against these lascivious Heritiques, demonstrating the damnablenesse [Page 299] and destructivenesse of their wayes,
1. By examples of Gods vengeance for like impieties and impurities in former times, viz. Upon Israel for unbeliefe, ver. 5. Upon Angels for Apostacy, ver. Upon Sodom and Gomorrha &c. For their lusts, ver. 7.
These examples he applyes to these Seducers,
- 1. Describing them by their, 1. Uncleannesse, ver. 8. 2. Despising and reproaching Magistrates, ver. 8, 9. 3. Impudency in reviling what they know not, ver. 10. 4. Bruitish intemperance in carnall pleasures, ver. 10. 5. Cruelty to their brethren. 6. Covetousnesse. 7. Seditiousnesse, ver. 11. 8. Epicurisme in meats and drinks, ver. 12. 9. Hypocrisie. 10. Instability. 11. Deadnesse and Barrennesse to all good fruit, ver. 12. 12. Wrathfulnesse. 13. Shamefull uncleannesse. 14. Levity and inconstancy, ver. 13.
- 2. Threatning them, in generall with woe, ver. 11, in particular with eternall destruction, ver. 13.
- 2. By Testimonies,
- 1. Of Enoch. ver. 14.15. To which he adds further descriptions of [Page 300] their viciousnesse, ver. 16.
- 2. Of the Apostles themselves. v. 17, 18. where he further describes these Heretiques by their Separation from Church assemblies, by their want of Gods Spirit. v. 9.
- 3. Hortatory Directions by way of Remedy, for 1. Mutuall edification. 2. Prayer, v. 20. 3. Love of God, ver. 21. 4. Different course to be taken by them in recovering severall persons from seducements, v. 22, 23. 5. Zeale against all impurity, v. 23
- III. Conclusion of the whole Epistle with adoxology to God, who is able to keep them without spot and blamelesse, &c. v. 24, 25.
III. THE PROPHETICAL BOOK, Viz. THE Revelat.
THE PROPHETICAL BOOK of the New Testament, prophetically foretelling what shall be the future condition of the Church of Christ in all ages, to the end of the world, is the REVELATION OF JOHN THE [Page 301] DIVINE. This may well be called a Propheticall Book; For 1 The Holy Ghost himselfe divers times stiles it A Prophecy, Rev. 1.3. and 7.10, 18.19. 2 And the nature of the Book is chiefly Propheticall, as the Series of the Book implyes; and also some passages plainly testify, that it treats of things, which must shortly come to passe, Rev. 1.1. and things which shall be hereafter, Rev. 1.19.
Title, This book in Greek is called [ [...]] i. e. The Apocalypse (or Revelation,) of John the Divine ▪ whereby are indigitated to us, both the nature of the Book, and the Penman of it.
Nature of the Book, A Revelation. so called, because it Reveals and makes known unto us secret hidden mysteries, and future events. Its true, this Revelation, is not without mixture of much intricatenesse and obscurity, (as all prophecies are enigmaticall and ambiguous to men, till they be effected, but when the time prophecied is come, then they have a more clear, and certaine exposition. So Iraen. Advers. Haeres. l. 4. c. 43.) And this to exercise the [Page 302] Reader to search out the truth, as August. de Civitat. dei, l. 20. c. 17. hath well observed.
Penman or instrumentall Author of it, viz. Iohn the Theologue or Divine. What Iohn this was, some question. Eusebius mentions two Iohns, whose monuments were to be seen at Ephesus, viz. Iohn the Evangelist, who wrote the Gospel, and 1 Epistle of John: and Iohn the Presbyter, who wrote 2. and 3. Epistle of Iohn, and the Revelation, Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 39. To him also seems to incline, Dionys. Alexandrinus in lib. de Repromissionibus, But that this is a great mistake, and that IOHN the Evangelist and Apostle was Penman of this Revelation, may be cleared by these considerations.
1. This Title attributes it to Iohn the Divine. This Epithet we read no where to be given to Iohn the Presbyter, but belongs to Iohn the Apostle and Evangelist, [ [...]] by way of peculiar emphasis, because like an Eagle he soares aloft, writes more sublimely of the Divinity of Iesus Christ, both in this Book, (in which D. Par [...]us hath observed [Page 303] XLVIII. Arguments of Christs Divinity) as also in his Gospel, Iohn 1.1. &c. and in his 1. Epistle. And the King of Spaines Bible, of Montanus Edition, hath this Greek Title before the Revelation, [ [...]] i. e. The Revelation of the Holy Apostle, and Evangelist Iohn the Divine, which Title clears this matter, and is consonant to Rev. 1.1, 2. (whether it were prefixed by Iohn, or after by the Church,) nor is it any way probable that Christ sent his Angel to any other Iohn, then to the Apostle with this Revelation.
2. Iohn the Penman of this Book is so descr [...]bed, that Iohn the Apostle and Evangelist seemes plainly to be indigitated, Revel. 1.1, 2. His servant Iohn: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the Testimony of Iesus Christ. Now how notably did Iohn beare record of the word of God, and testimony of Iesus Christ? see Iohn. 1.1.2.14. and 1 Iohn 1, 1. and 5.9. compared with Revel. 19.13.
3. The style much resembles that of Iohns Gospel and Epistles. As for instance; It is peculiar to Iohn to stile Christ, The [Page 304] word. compare Iohn 1.1.14. 1 Iohn 1.1. and 5.7. with Revel. 1.2. In his Gospell he stiles Christ the Lamb of God Iohn, 1.29.36. so in the Revelation Christ is called the Lamb at least 28. times.
4 That Iohn who wrote this Revelation, had it in the Ile Patmos made known to him, who was there for the name of God and Testimony of Iesus Christ Rev. 1.9. And Histories mention no other Iohn, but only Iohn the Apostle to be in Patmos. Banished thither by Domitian the Emperour for the Gospel's sake, neer to period of his Reigne, (as Funccius computes) about the ninety seventh year after Christ. See Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 16. and 18.
5. To these might be added the Harmonious consent of ancient Fathers, who unanimously conclude, that Iohn the Apostle penned this Book. Dionys. Areopag. who was Pauls disciple, Act. 17. who wrote about the sixtieth year after Christ, in those writings ascribed to him, calleth the Apocalypse, A secret and mysticall vision of the beloved Disciple, Dionys. Eccles. Hierarch. c. 3. [Page 305] Iustin Martyr, who wrote in the one hundred and fiftieth year after Christ, ascribes the Apocalypse to Iohn, one of the Apostles of Christ. Iustin. in Dial. ad Tryphon. To which passage Eusebius relating, saith, Iustin mentions the Apocalypse of Iohn, plainly saying it is the Apostles, Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 4. c. 18. Irenaeus, who wrote in the eightieth year after Christ, saith, And what things soever Iohn the disciple of the Lord saw in the Apocylapse — Iraen. Advers. Haeres▪ l. 4 c. 50. and l. 4. c. 37. p. 373. A. Coloniae 1596. To these might be added the suffrage of many more, as of Greek Fathers, Clem. Alexand. Paedag. l. 2. c. 12. Athanas. in Synops. Epiphan. Haeres. 51.54, 76. Chrysost. Hom. 5. in Psal. 91. of Latin fathers, as Tertull. contra Marcion l. 4. Cyprian. de e [...]hort. Martyr. c. 8.10.11.12. Ambros. in Psal 50 & l. 3. de spir. sanct. c. 21. August. de Civi [...]. dei l. 20. c. 7. & de Haeres. c. 30. & de Doct. Christ. l. 2. c. 18. videantur Annot. in Irenae. l. 5. c. 30. p. 490. Colon. 1596. but in so plaine a case these may suffice.
So that by all this, its plainly evident [Page 306] that the Penman of the Revelation was Iohn the Apostle, that wrote the Gospel, and the Epistles. The unfolding of his name, and who he was more particularly, See in Annot. to Iohn's Gospel.
Authority of this Book, is not Humane, but Divine. For,
1. This book was indited by Iesus Christ himselfe the faithfull and true witnesse, who sent his Angel to testifie the same to Iohn the Apostle, and by him to the Churches. The Revelation of Iesus Christ which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to passe; and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant Iohn— Rev. 1.1. and towards the close of the book he saith, I Iesus have sent mine Angel to testify unto you these things in the Churches, Rev. 22.16. Note, this Revelation was given by Iohn the Apostle to the Churches, by an Angel to Iohn, by Iesus Christ to that Angel, by God to Iesus Christ: How punctually then is the Divine Authority of it asserted?
2. It was penned by Iohn the Apostle of Christ (who was divinly inspired & acted by the Holy Ghost) as hath bin formerly [Page 307] manifested, and therefore it is of divine Authority, especially considering that this blessed Apostle was commanded by Iesus Christ to write this Book, Saying I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and wh [...] thou seest write in a Book,—write the things which thou hast s [...]en, and the things which are, and the thing [...] which shall b [...] hereafter, Rev. 1.11 19. See also Rev. 2.1.8.12.18. and 3.1, 7, 14. and 14.13. and 19.9. and 21.5.
3. The nature of the book imports the divine Authority of it. For 1. It is eminently Propheticall, speaking of things that shall be hereafter, Rev. 1.1, 19. and 22.7, 10, 18, 19. and the prophecies of this book, are touching future events in reference to the Church to the end of the world, till the Church, the Lambs wife, shall be fully ready for compleat marriage with the Lamb, Rev. 19.7, 8, 9. So that neither ancient writers nor any other, but such as were inspired with a spirit of prophecy from the al-knowing God, could foretell these things to come, Isa [...]. 41.22. 2. In the propheticall expressions of it, [Page 308] it is consonant to other propheticall books, and gives light to them, Daniel, Zechariah, especially Ezekiel, As in the particulars of eating up the Book, Rev. 10.9, 10. with Ezek. 2.8. and 3.3. of sealing Gods promise, Rev. 7.2, 3. with Ezek. 9. of the foure living Creatures, Rev. 4.6, 7. with Ezek. 1.5.6. of Gog and Magog, Rev. 20.8. with Ezek. 38.2. and 39.1. of the measuring of the Temple and City, Rev. 21.15. with Ezek. 40.3. &c. Of the two olive trees, &c. Rev. 11.4. with Zech. 4.3, 11, 14. &c. 3. Many things foretold in this Book prophetically, are fulfilled and come to passe actually, As Interpreters have observed in many particulars. Therefore this Book is of divine Authority, Ierem. 28.9.4. Promise of explaining how long the Idolatrous and Tyrannicall Kingdome of Anti-Christ should last, was made to Daniel the Prophet, Dan. 12.4, 9. which some conceive to be fulfilled in these Apocalypticall visions, Rev. c. 11. and 12. and 13. and 17. &c. And had not Christ under the New Testament left his Church some propheticall Record, [Page 309] for her comfort against the horrid cruelty, idolatry and darknesse of the Anti-christian Dominion, showing when it should have an end, and how happy at last the Church should be, all her enemies being universally made the footstool of the Lambe; she were in a worse condition then under the Old Testament; which were absurd.
4. As the Holy Ghost by Moses, the first Penman of the Canon of the Old Testament warned the Jewes against adding to or diminishing from the word of God, yee shall not adde unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish from it, Deut. 9.2. and 12.32. So by the Apostle Iohn the last Penman of the Canon of the New Testament, Iesus Christ warneth all persons that heare the words of this Prophecy; If any man shall adde unto these things, God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in this Book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the Book of this Prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the Holy City, and from the things which are written in this Book, Rev. 22.18, [Page 310] 19. By which severe Commination, the integrity and divine Authority of this Book is asserted by Christ, against all whom Christ foresaw, would either indeavour to infringe the Authority of it, or corrupt the purity of it. Hereby then the whole divine Canon is sealed up, as fully now compleat, and divinely Authenticall, after which we are to expect no more Scripture from God.
5. The generall current of best Antiquity, except some few particular persons, and divers of them guilty of such heresies as this Book condemnes, hath embraced this Book, and accounted it of divine Authority. As those formerly cited, to prove Iohn the Apostle to be Penman of it, and many more that might be enumerated. As that ancient Ancyran Councel, held before the Nicene. in Append. as also the third Councell of Carthage, Can. 47. Cyprian frequently alledges the Revelation among the other Canonicall bookes, as De exhort. martyrum, c. 8. c. 11. c. 12. Testimon. Advers. Iudaeos l. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3.6, 11. &c.
6. The Cavils and Objections, against [Page 311] the divine Authority of this Book, reckoned up by Erasmus or others, how weak and unsatisfactory they are, may appeare in severall writers, who have confuted them. Especially vid. Bez. Prolegom. in Apocylaps. Ioannis. and Gerh. loc. Com. De scrip. sac. in exeges. cap. 10. Sect. 294. ad sin. cap.
Excellency of this Book is most considerable For,
1. The conveyance of it at first to the Church is singular. From God to Iesus Christ; From Iesus Christ to an Angel; From the Angel to Iohn, whom Jesus peculiarly loved above all his Apostles and Disciples, Rev. 1.1. And this to Iohn when in exile for Christ in the Isle Patmos; and that not on a common day▪ but on the Lords day, the Queen of dayes; and [...]o Iohn in Patmos, on the Lords day, not in an ordinary but extraordinary composure and elevation of his soule, when he was in the spirit, caught up (as it were) and transported in an holy extasie and spirituall Rapture, that he might the more attend to these mysteries revealed, and have more immediate un-interrupted Communion [Page 312] with Jesus Christ the Revealer, Rev. 1, 9, 10. &c. what can all this import, but some singularly eminent treasure for the Church in this book, whereby the Church in her deepest tribulation, may be (with Iohn) spiritually intransed and ravished with many surpassing grounds of joy, and consolation?
2. The stile is stately and sublime, and may wonderfully take the highest notion; The expressions quick, piercing and patheticall, and may pleasingly penetrate the dullest affection. The whole contexture is so full of divine majesty, that it commands an awfull Reverence in all gracious hearts that read it.
3. The matter of it is most heavenly and spirituall, and that in exceeding great variety, notably describing the Divinity of Christ, His offices and the benefits of them, clearly pointing out Anti-Christs Seate, Tyranny, Rise, Growth, Power, Acts and Fall, and most lively delineating the Churches condition, what it was in the Primitive times after Christ, and what it should be afterwards till the worlds end; how sad, [Page 313] yet s [...]fe under Anti-christs dominion; how sweet and happy after Anti-Christs destruction; how comfortable at the day of judgement; and how glorious in heaven with Iesus Christ for evermore. What Saint would not thirst much to read and here, more to understand, but most of all to enjoy these things? Some of them are laid downe most mystically in abstruse visions, to exercise the judgements of the wisest; some more familiarly to succour the infirmity even of the weakest. In some places the Lamb may wade, in others the Elephant may swim. Those prevent contempt, these anticipate discouragement. Ioao [...]imus Abbas prefers this Prophecy, before the Prophecy of all other Prophets. Beza saith, That those things in other Prophets, which were not fulfilled after Christs coming, the holy spirit hath heaped them all together in this precious book, and also added others so farre as was needfull or usefull for the Church to know them, Bez. Prolegom. in Apoc. Oecolampadius cals this book, The best Paraphrast of all the Prophets. Ioh. Oecolamp. Praefat. in Dani [...]l. Hierome [Page 314] saith, Apocalypsis tot habet sacramenta quot verba. Parum dixi, pro merito voluminis, laus omnis inferior est; in verbis singulis multiplices latent intelligentiae, i. e. The Revelation hath as many mysteries as words. Its but a little I say, all praise is too low for the merit of this volume; manifold understandings lie hid in every word. Hieron. in Epist. ad Paulin.
4. The Book it selfe is compleat, capable of no Addition or Detraction, but upon severest Penalties, Rev. 22.18.19.
5. The Penman Eminent, viz. John that beloved disciple, that sweet compound of love. It was Moses his honour who was Gods peculiar favourite, to be Penman of the first Book of the Old Testament. And it was Iohn's honour who was Christs peculiar favourite, to be Penman of the last Book of the New Testament; oh what divine love and favour is made known unto the Church, in all the volumes between the Armes of these two favourites!
6. Finally, God counts them blessed soules, that read, heare and keepe the words of this Prophecy. Blessed is [Page 315] he that readeth, and they that heare the words of this Prophecy, and keep these things that are written therein, Rev. 1.3. A blessed Book, that renders them blessed, who are practically versed in it.
The time when this Revelation was written, was when Iohn was banished into the Ile that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the Testimony of Iesus Christ, Rev. 1.9.10. Iohn was banished into Patmos, by that cruell persecutor Domitian, in the fourteenth yeare of his Reigne, saith Hieron. Catal. illustr. vir. in vit. Ioan. Domitian reigned in all but fifteen years, as Helvic. observes, and his fourteenth yeare was in the ninety fourth yeare after Christ, Helvic. in Chronol ▪ in the ninety sixth after Christ, saith Pareus Prolegom. in Apocal. c. 5. This Book is conceived to be written after all the Books of the New Testament.
Occasion of this Revelation seemes to be this. Iohn being banished into the Ile Patmos, Rev. 1.9, 10. doubtless gave himselfe to prayer, and sacred meditations about the affairs of Christ [Page 316] and his Church, whereupon Iesus Christ appeared to his beloved disciple, in a spirituall ravishment, showing him what was his pleasure, both touching the present Churches of Asia, and touching his whole Church to the end of the world; thus comforting him: and commanding Iohn to write his visions, for the comforting of them.
Scope of this book is,
Generally, To make knowne by Iohn unto the Churches both the things that then were, and that should be thereafter, Rev. 1.19.
Particularly. 1 To informe the Church of the many sharp conflicts she should have with Satan and his instruments, especially Hereticks, persecuting Tyrants, and Anti-Christ himselfe, that so she might not dream only of Halcyon dayes, but might prepare more and more for the worst of stormes ▪ 2 To discover and point out in lively Colours that grand Anti-christ, that the Church might run and read, and most infallibly know who he is. 3 As also to support and comfort the Church and all the faithfull, over all [Page 317] their tribulations, with the hopes of the utter overthrow of Anti-christ and all their enemies; of their owne joyfull triumphs over them; and of the happy condition which the Church shall afterwards enjoy, partly in this world, but chiefly in the world to come.
Though this book be most obscure and intricate, yet these things may somewhat facilitate the understanding of i [...], If we shall,
1. Keep the maine scope of the Book, still in our eye.
2. Compare the passages and phrases of the Revelation, with those of other Prophecies, as Rev. 11.4. with Zech. 4.3, 11, 14. Rev. 10.9, 10. with Ezek. 2.8. and 3.3. — Rev. 4.6, 7, 8. with Ezek. 1.5, 6, 7, 8. —Rev. 20.8. with Ezek. 18.2. and 39.1.—Rev. 21.15. with Ezek. 40.3. &c.
3. Parallel with this Prophecy, the subsequent Histories after Iohn's time, the Histories of the Roman Empire and Church, which testify clearly what cruelty and persecutions the Romane Emperours successively raised up against [Page 318] Christians: with what subtilty and fraud the B. of Rome did by degrees, (through the folly, cowardise, negligence, &c. of the Emperours,) step up into their throne, and subjugate not onely Rome, the Seate of the Empire, but also the whole Empire it selfe to his dominion and pleasure, whence we may derive not a little light, to see what is meant by the opening of the Seals. The Stars falling from heaven to earth. The beast speaking great and blasphemous things. The beast and false Prophet. The image of the beast. And the whore riding upon the beast with seven heads and ten hornes, and ruling in the city on the seven hils, &c.
4. Consider prudently the experience of later and present times; how accurately doth the description of the Beast and scarlet whore agree, to the Papacy? of the Locusts, to the Romane Clergy, and of the Frogs comming out of the mouth of the Dragon, the beast and the false Prophet, to the Iesuites and Romane Emissaries, compassing sea and land, and creeping into Kings palaces, to gather them together, to the warre of the great day of God almighty.
[Page 319]5. Finally, if we shall diligently read, meditate and pray, that the holy spirit, who revealed these things to Iohn, would reveale their sense and meaning to us, These things may help us to untie many knots, and render many difficulties easie.
Principall parts. In the Book of Revelation are chiefly considerable, 1 The Preface, 2 The Substance of the Book, and 3 The Conclusion.
The Preface, which is [...]. Generall, in I reference to the whole Prophecy, noting the Matter, Author, Penman, and Profit of this Book, c. 1. ver. 1, 2, 3. 2. Speciall or particular, in reference to the seven Churches of Asia Minor, and in them to the whole Catholick Church, figured by them, wherein are, 1. A Nomination of persons writing and written to. 2. The Salutation. 3. And a glorious Description of Jesus Christ, ver. 4. to 9.
The Substance or Body of this Propheticall II Book. c. 1. v. 9. to c. 22. v. 6. Wherein is contained a Narration of the State of the Church. I. Militant on earth. c. 1. v. 9. to c. 20. v. 11. II. Triumphant in heaven, c. 20. v. 11. to c. 22. v. 6.
The Condition of the Church Militant is declared 1. For present, what it was when [Page 320] Iohn wrote the Revelation, c. 1. v. 9. to c. 4. v. 1. 2. For future, what it should be till the judgement day. c. 4. v. 1. to c. 20. v. 11.
I. Uision.
I. Touching the State of the Church then present. viz. The Asian Churches principally; are laid downe two things, viz.
- 1. A Preparation to the discovery of it, by A Vision of seven Golden Candlesticks and seven Starres. This is Iohn's first vision. And here we have a description, both of Iohn who had the vision: as also of the vision it selfe; both in respect of the 1 Forme of it. The 2 Effect it had upon Iohn, and the 3 Consequents ensuing thereupon. viz. The Comforting of John, Command to write the vision, and the Interpretation of the vision, c. 1. v. 9. to the end of the chapter.
- 2. A Narration or Description of the Condition of Christs Church then present, and this in Seven distinct Epistles, directed to the seven Angels of those seven Asian Churches. viz. 1. Of Ephesus, c. 2. v. 1. to 8. 2. Of Smyrna, c. 2. v. 8. to 12. 3. Of Pergamus, c. 2. v. 12. to 18. 4. Of Thyatira, c. 2. v. 18. to the end of the chapter. 5. Of Sardis, c. 3, 1. to 7. 6. Of Philadelphia, c. 3. v. 7. to 14. 7. Of Laodicea, c. 3. v. 14. to the end of the chapter ▪ In all which Seven Epistles▪ the same method [Page 321] is generally observed by the spirit of Christ, viz. Every Epistle, containing 1. A Description of Jesus Christ, suitable to the vision of him, in c. 1. formerly. 2. A Narratio [...] of the Good commendable; or Evill condemnable in the Angel of every Church, and so in every Church. 3. Promises or Threats, proportionable to their vertues or vices, 4. Hortatory Conclusions, inciting to attention,
II. Touching the state of the Church for the future, especially the European Churches, This is insisted upon more largely and more mystically. Which in sum amounts to thus much, viz. To Pre-monish the Church of her great tribulations in this world, 1 By persecuting Tyrants, 2 Then by persecuting Hereticks, 3 At length by Anti-Christs most cruell Oppressions both corporall and spirituall. Against all which the holy-Ghos [...] intermingles many comforts to the Church, as that 1 God will be with her in all her distresses and not forsake her. 2 Her troubles shall not be endlesse, nor over-long. 3. Her enemies shall all of them at last be utterly destroyed. 4. The Church shall at last be set in a safe and happy condition in this world, but especially in the world to come. Now all these things are laid down visionally, in six other visions, remarkably distinct from one another, viz. II. Vision. c. 4, 5, 6, 7. III. Vision. c. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, IIII. Vision. c. 12, 13, [Page 322] 14. V. Vision. c. 15, 16. VI. Vision. c. 17, 18, 19. VII. Vision. c. 20, 21, 22. to v. 6. All which Visions seem to be comprized in two distinct Prophecies, or Systemes of Visions, parallel and contemporary to one another. Both revealing the mysteries for substance, but the later proceeding more punctually to particulars, as some are of opinion; Others rather think the former Prophecy comprehends the destinies of the Romane Empire, under seven Seals and seven Trumpets; The later Prophecy, the destinies of the Church, or of Christian Religion. The I. Prophecy beginning with the B. Sealed with 7. Seals c. 4. v. 1. ending c. 11. II. Prophecy, beginning c. 12. v. 1. (yet so as to take in some passages mentioned in the fifth Trumpet, as the Little book, the measuring of the Temple, the outer Court, the two Witnesses) continuing to the end of the Book. Now the sober considering, and wise comparing of these two distinct Prophecies with one another, may (as some think,) singularly serve to clear many difficulties throughout this Book,
II. Uision.
THE I. PROPHECY BEGINNETH.
The State of the Church future is revealed to JOHN, in a mysterious vision of A Book sealed with seven Seals, (All the particular mysteries in which Book, what man on earth can certainly and infallibly open, unlesse [Page 323] he had Iohn's Apocalypticall Key?) Here consider the
- I. Preparatorys to the opening of the Seals, viz.
- 1. The Vision of God sitting upon a glorious Throne in heaven, c. 4. wherein are [...]. The Transition to this vision, v. 1. 2. The Description of God enthroned in heaven, v. 2, 3. 3. Em [...]le [...]es of Majesty about the Throne, viz. 1 Twen [...]y [...]oure Elders, 2 Lightnings, Thunders, Voices, 3 Seven Lamps, i. e. the seven Spirits of God, 4 A Sea of glasse, 5 Foure living Creatures, 6 The Songs of Prayse, presented to him that sate on the Throne by the foure Beasts, and [...]enty foure Elders, vers. 4. to the end of the chapter.
- 2. The vision of a Book, in the hand of him that sate on the Throne, sealed with seven Seales, c. 5. Here note 1. The sealed Book described, v. 1. 2. The inability of all creatures to open the book, v. 2, 3, 4. 3. The Lambs ability to open it, who stood before the Throne, v. 5, 6, 7. 4. The foure beasts and twenty foure Elders Gratulation, with Adoration to the Lamb for opening it▪ vers. 8. to the end of the chapter.
- II. The Opening of the seven Seals themselves in Order, c. 6, 7, 8. In the opening of which Seals is revealed to Iohn, what shall be the future State of the Church of God, [Page 324] from that time to the end of the world. In the Seventh of which Seales are brought in seven Trumpets; & in the Seventh of which Trumpets, are brought in Seven vials of the wrath of God, full of the Seven last plagues. More particularly consider here the
- I. Seale opened, where 1 The attention required, 2 The matter revealed in it, viz. A white horse &c. c. 6. verse 1.2.
- II. Seale opened, where 1 Attention called for. 2 The mystery revealed, A Red horse, &c. c. 6. v. 3.4.
- III. Seale opened, where 1 Attention is incited. 2 The Mystery revealed, A Black horse, his rider having Ballances in his hand, A spirituall famine threatned, c. 6. v. 5, 6.
- IV. Seale opened, where 1 Attention is stirred up 2 Matter Revealed, A pale horse and his rider Death, hell following, &c. c. 6. ver. 7.8.
- V. Seale opened, where note 1 What was seen, soules under the Altar, martyred. 2. What these soules did, cryed for vengeance. 3. What they obtained, 1 White Robes for present, 2 Promise of compleat glory with their fellow martyrs, c. 6. v. 9.10.11.
- VI. Seale opened, setting forth God [...] dreadfull judgements upon the enemies of the Church, for their bloody cruelties exercised to death upon the Saints, as was intimated in the fifth [Page 325] Seale. Here are considerable, 1. The Signes seen by Iohn, viz. A great earthquake, The Sunne became black, &c. c. 6, v. 12, 13, 14. 2. The things signified, viz. Kings, great men, &c i. e. all sorts and degrees of Persecutors, in horrour and despaire at their vvits ends, by reason of Gods judgements coming upon them from Christ so terribly, as if the very judgement-day were come, c. 6. vers. 15.16.17.
III. Uision.
VII. Seale opened. Here consider 1 Preparatories to it, 2 Mysterious Contents of it.
- 1. Preparatories to it, are in c. 7. fore-arming the Church with previous consolations against all ensuing miseries that were to come upon it: Against which evils the Holy Ghost here comforts the Church. 1. By that security, which the Angel of God, sealing the servants of God in their foreheads, shall afford them in midst of troubles, c. 7, 1. to 9. 2. By that triumphant victory, which after their great tribulation, all the faithfull shall have over all their miseries and enemies, c. 7. v. 9. to the end of the chapter.
- 2. Mysteries revealed in the opening of this seventh Seale; being farre more, and those more intricate to understand, then in the opening of any of [Page 326] the other six Seals. Events following the opening of the seventh Seale, are either I. Preparatory, as 1. Silence in heaven for halfe an houre, portending great things to follow, c. 8.1. 2. Vision of seven Angels with seven Trumpets, v. 2. 3. Vision of another Angel, and his actions, viz. offering up of incense; and casting the fire of the Altar into the earth, c. 8. v. 3. 4, 5. 4. Preparation of the seven Angels to sound their Trumpets v. 6. II. Executory, viz. the Angels actuall sounding of their seven Trumpets. c. 8. v. 7. &c. to c. 12.1.
- I. Trumpet sounded, where consider, 1. The Signe following▪ Haile and fire mingled with bloud cast upon the earth, 2 The effect thereof, viz. The third part of trees burnt, &c. c. 8. v. 7.
- II. Trumpet sounded, where 1. The Signe following, viz. A great mountaine burning with fire cast into the sea. 2. The effect ensuing, the third part of the sea became blood, &c. c. 8. v. 8.9.
- III. Trumpet sounded, where, 1. The Signe ensuing thereupon. A great star fell from heaven—called worm-wood, 2. The effects thereof, viz. The third part of the waters became bitter, and many died of them, c. 8. v. 10, 11.
- IV. Trumpet sounded, where 1. The [Page 327] Signe. viz. The third part of sun, moon and stars smitten. 2. The effects thereupon. viz. day and night shone not for a third part, c. 8. v. 12.
Here is annexed (by way of Preparatory Transition to the other three Trumpets,) John's vision of an Angel flying through the midst of heaven, denouncing three Woes by reason of the three last Trumpets, c. 8, 13.
I. Woe.
V. Trumpet sounded, where note 1. The Signe appearing, viz. A starre falling from heaven to earth. 2. The foure effects of this starre falling, viz. He opens the bottomlesse pit, Thence raiseth up smoake. Darkens Sunne and aire with the smoake, and brings Locusts unto the earth out of the smoake, which LOCUSTS are variously and notably described. 3. The Conclusion shutting up the Calamities of this Trumpet, and forewarning of them that follow, c. 9. 1. to 13.
II. Woe.
VI. Trumpet sounded, c. 9. v. 13. to the end of the chapter. Herein consider, 1. The Command to loose the foure Angels bound in Euphrates, v. 13, 14. 2. Execution of this command, v. 15. 3. The Description of the large Army of Euphratean Horses and Horsemen, v. 15, 16, 17. 4. The [Page 328] Calamitous effects wrought by them, v. 18, 19, 20, 21.
VII. Trumpet, Concerning which note. 1. Preparatories to it. 2. Sounding of it.
- I. Preparatoryes to it (it being the Trumpet of highest concernment, because when that shall be sounded, The mystery of God shall be finished▪ as he hath declared to his servants the Prophets, c. 10, 7.) are very largely premised, c. 10, 1, to c. 11.15. Which seems principally to be Consolatory to the Church, against all her former and future tribulations, and this by the Vision of a mighty Angel come down from heaven, viz. Jesus Christ himselfe the Angel of the Covenant. Touching whom here are,
- 1. The Angels description, c. 10. ver. 1.
- 2. The Angels Actions, 1. Held a little Book in his hand, 2. Set his right foot on the Sea, his left on the land. 3. Roared as a Lyon; 7. thunders ecchoing again. 4. Swore that time should be no more, but when the 7th Angel should sound, the mystery of God should be finished, c. 10. v. 2. to 8.
- 3. The Angels commands to John, 1. To eate the little Book in the Angels hand, that he might Prophecy▪ c. 10.8, 9, 10, 11. 2. To measure the Temple, Altar, and [Page 329] worshippers, but not the Court; for it should be trodden under foot of the Gentiles 42. moneths, c. 11. v. 1, [...].
- 4. The Angels promises concerning his two Winesses, and their Prophecy, and how after they shall be killed by the Beast upon the finishing of their testimony. They shall againe Revive, c. 11. v. 3. to 14.
Thus the Second Woe is ended, and the third hastneth, v. 14.
III. Woe.
II. Sounding of the seventh Trumpet, wherein the Mystery of God is finished. And the Churches Miseries ended, c. [...] 1. v. 15. to the end of the chap. where consider, I. Things heard in heaven, viz. 1. Great voyces, saying▪ The Kingdomes of this world are become the Lords, and his Christs, &c. ver. 15. 2. The triumphant song or gratulation of the 24. Elders unto God, for honouring himselfe, and for the coming of his judgement to reward the Saints, and destroy the earth, ver. 16. 17, 18. II Things seene &c. In Gods Temple opened in heaven, viz. 1. The Saints Rewards, The Ark of his Testament, i. e. Jesus Christ. 2. The wickeds Rewards, Lightnings, voices, thundrings, earthquakes and great haile, ver. 19.
The former Prophecy endeth.
IV. Uision
THE II PROPHECY BEGINNETH.
Hitherto of the I. Prophecy, or Systeme of Visions, Denoting (as is thought by some) more especially the Condition of the last Empire viz. the Romane: Now to the II Prophecy or Systeme of Visions, (contemporary with the former both in the Seales and Trumpets) foretelling chiefly the future condition of the Church till the judgement day. Herein chiefly are set down, 1. The Tribulations and Persecutions of the Church by severall enemies. 2. The deliverance of the Church by her enemies destruction. 3. The happy condition of the Church, upon her deliverance. Though the common opinion of interpreters (who take not any notice of 2 contemporary Prophesies, and their Synchronismes, but judge these Visions to be one continued Prophecy,) bring all that followes under the seventh Trumpet, thus. viz. The sounding of the seventh Trumpet is propounded, I. Summarily, c. 11.15. to the end of the chap. II. Plenarily, and this either, 1. By way of Recognition and fuller explaining of the former Seales and Trumpets, in a digression, c. 12, 13, 14. 2. By way of Prediction of things future under the seventh Trumpet more largely, c. 15, 16, 17, &c. For substance these will come much to one. (But lets follow the former.)
[Page 331]I. The Persecutions of the Church by severall enemies greatly distressing her in this whole fourth Vision, c. 12. ver. 1. to c. 15. ver. 1. More particularly here note,
- I. The Persecution of the woman that brought forth the man-child, viz. Both Jesus Christ, and the Primitive Church of the Jewes (as some are of opinion) even from her infancy; and this by Dragon, i. e, (as is expounded c. 12. ver. 9.) Satan▪ c. 12. v. 1. to 17.
- II. The Dragons Persecution of, and making war with the remnant of her seed.
Viz. (as some thinke) with the Church of the Gentiles, where consider,
- 1. The Dragons Resolution and endeavours thus to persecute, c. 12. v. 17.
- 2, The instruments of Persecution, incited and imployed by the great Red Dragon, viz. 1. The Beast rising up out of the Sea having seaven heads and ten hornes, c. 13. ver. 1. to 11. 2. The Beast rising out of the earth, having two hornes like a Lambe, and speaking as a Dragon, &c. c. 13. ver. 11. to the end of the chap.
- 3. The event of this Persecution, viz. The Saints Victory through their constant and faithfull confession of Christ even to Martyrdom, this their victory being exellently amplifyed [Page 332] by the Causes, and Effects of it, c. 14. 1. to the end of the chap.
V. Uision.
II. The Deliverance of the Church, by the destruction of her enemies represented in the Vision of the 7. Vials full of the wrath of God, the 7. last plagues, poured out upon the eart [...] by 7. Angels, Here are, the
- I. Preparatories to the pouring out of the Vials c. 15, throughout.
- II. Pouring out of the Vials of the wrath of God upon the earth, c. 16.1. &c. viz.
- I. Vial poured out, c. 16. ver. 2.
- II. Vial poured out, v. 3.
- III. Vial poured out, v. 4. to 8.
- IV. Vial poured out, v. 8, 9.
- V. Vial poured out, v. 10, 11.
- VI. Vial poured out, v. 12. to 17.
- VII. Vial poured out, c. 16.
This pouring out of the VII. Vial, is laid down, 1. More Summarily, 2. More Plenarily.
I. More Summarily & compendiously c. 16. ver. 17. to the end of the chap.
VI Uision.
II. More plenarily and copiously, c. 17, 18, 19, & 20 to ver. 11. Wherin divers mysteries are most lively explicated, which formerly were heretofore more obscurely mentioned. Notably pointing out the [Page 333] Rise, Seate, Reigne, Vassals, Successe, and at last the fatall Ruine of Anti-christ and all the Churches enemies. So that this part affords no small light to the Prophetick part of the Revelation. Here consider, 1. The judgement of the great whore. 2. The event thereupon.
I. The judgement of the great whore c. 17, 18, 19. Where are,
- 1. A notable description of the great whore, that is to be judged; By Visionall Representation, c. 17.1. to 7. By real explanation therof, v. 7. to 16.
- 2. The instruments that shall destroy the Whore. viz. The ten hornes, which are ten Kings, &c. c. 17. ver. 16, 17, 18.
- 3. The Emphatical promulgation of the woful ruine of Babylon, the Seate of the great whore, This is done by three Angels, 1. The first Angel declares the inevitable certainty of Babylons ruine, c. 18..1, 2, 3. 2. The second warning all God's people to come out of her, sets forth the grievousnesse of her destruction, with the sad lamentations of all her friends and vassals, ver. 4. to 21. 3. The third Angel, under the [Page 334] type of a great Milstone cast into the Sea, as it were seales up the irrecoverablenesse of her ruine, ver. 21, 22, 23, 24.
- 4. The gratulatory exaltations of the heavenly company 1 for the judgement of the whore, 2 for the preparation of the Lamb's wife for marriage with him, c. 19. ver. 1. to 11.
- 5. The finall and totall conquest of the Lamb and his Armies, over the beast and false Prophet, and the Kings of the earth and their Armies, c. 19. v. 11. to the end of the chap. Hitherto of the judgement of the great Whore.
VII. Or last Uision.
II. The event following after the judgement of the great Whore; which is chiefly three-fold,
- 1. The safety of the Saints (surviving the ruine of Babylon) from the seducements of the Dragon, the Devil and Satan, being chained up 1000 yeares, c. 20.1.2, 3.
- 2. The reviving of the Martyrs, and raigning with Christ 1000. yeares, the rest of the dead not living again till the 1000. yeares were finished, c, 20. v. 4, 5, 6.
- [Page 335]3. The Saints miraculous deliverance from, and victory over Gog and Magog; (Satan, after the 1000. yeares expired, being loosed out of prison.) c. 20. v. 7. to 11.
Hitherto (as is conceived) hath been Revealed the future state of the Church as Militant on earth.
The condition of the Church as triumphant in heaven, is described both in respect of the 1. Inchoation ▪ and 2. Duration of it.
- 1. The Inchoation or beginning of the Churches triumph, shall be at the last and generall judgement: which is pathetically described, c. 20. v. 11. to the end of the chapt.
- 2. The Duration or Continuance of it; viz. Eternal happinesse in Heaven, which is most gloriously set forth, c. 21. throughout &c. 22. ver. 1. to 6.
The Conclusion of this whole Prophecy; which III is either,
- 1. Principal, containing a confirmation of the whole Prophecy of this Revelation, by the Testimony,
- 1. Of the Angel, by whom the Lord shewed these things to John, c. 22. v. 6.
- 2. Of Christ himselfe, who gave this Revelation, ver. 7.
- 3. Of Iohn that received this Revelation, ver. 8, 9.
- [Page 336]4. Of Christ againe, ver. 10 to 18.
- 5. Of Iohn denouncing heavie judgements upon all that shall adde to, or take from this Prophecy, ver. 18, 19.
- 6. Of Christ testifying these things, Promising his speedy coming; amplified by Iohn's earnest request in his own and the Churches behalfe, ver. 20.
- 2. Lesse Principall, containing the Apostolicall Salutation to all the 7. Churches and faithfull Saints to whom this Revelation was written, ver. 21.
He that testifieth these things, saith; I come quickly. Amen. Even so, Come LORD JESUS.
Rev. 22.20.
D. Bernard. Medit. Devot. c. 4. Praemium est videre deum, vivere cum Deo, vivere de Deo; esse cum Deo esse, in Deo, quierit omnia in omnibus: habere Deum qui est Summum Bonum. Et ubi est summum bonum, ibi est summa felicitas, summa jucunditas, vera libe [...]tas, perfecta charitas, aeterna securitas, & secura aeternitas: ibi est vera laetitia, plena scientia, omnis plenitudo, & omnis Beatitudo.
Sic cum Deo homo Beatus erit, in cujus conscientia peccatum inventum non fuerit. Videbit Deum ad voluntatem, habebit ad voluptatem, fruetur ad jucunditatem. In aeternitate vigebit, in veritate fulgebit, in bonitate gaudebit.
CLAVIS BIBLIORVM. THE KEY OF THE BIBLE: Unlocking The richest Treasury of the Holy Scriptures.
THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, Rom. 1.2. were written by Moses, the Prophets, the Apostles, and other holy men of God, Luk. 16.29.31. Eph. 2.20. and 3.5. and 2 Pet. 1.21. The Covenant of God with man in Christ the Mediatour, that substantiall or begotten WORD, [Page 2] Iohn 1.1. is the Principall Subject Revealed and explained in the whole Scripturall, or written WORD.
Gods COVENANT with man in Christ is represented to us in Holy Scripture principally two wayes. viz. 1. As Promised, fore-prophecied and typified In Christ to be manifested afterwards in the flesh. Hence called the Covenants of Promise, Eph. 2.10. Covenants, not Covenant: because of the severall Publications of the Covenant with more and more Augmentations, in severall Points or Periods of time. Thus the Covenant is made known in all the Bookes of Scripture, written before Christs comming: which are therefore called the OLD-COVENANT, Heb. 8.13. or the OLD-TESTAMENT, 2 Cor. 3.14.
2. As performed, fulfilled and actually accomplished in Christ already come, and manifested in our flesh in fulnesse of time, Gal. 4.4, 5. Heb. 9. Heb. 10. Thus the Covenant is most clearly and fully unveyled to us in all the Books of Scripture written since Christs coming; [Page] [Page] [Page] [Page 3] which are therefore stiled the NEW COVENANT or the NEW TESTAMENT Heb. 8.8. Matth. 26.28. Heb. 9.15.
Thus the whole BIBLE is distributed into the 1 Old; and 2 New Testament.
THE OLD TESTAMENT.I
THE OLD TESTAMENT, (revealing the Covenants of promise) in respect of the Penmen whom the Holy Ghost imployed to write the Books thereof, is disparted by the Holy Ghost himselfe into two generall heads, viz. 1 Moses, and 2 the Prophets, Luk. 16.29.31. and 24.27. Iohn 1.45. or, The Law of Moses; and the Prophets, Act. 28.23.
J. MOSES.
MOSES (the man of God, Psal. 90.1. The first Penman of Scripture:) was an Ebrew borne in Egypt, after the worlds creation about 2432 years, before Christ about 1496. years; Mose [...] is the seventh from Abraham, a New Henoch, who was the seventh from Adam. So was Eber the seventh from Enoch; and Isaac the seventh from Eber. All excellent among ordinary men. As the Sabbath in regard of the six other daies. The view of Holy Script. p. 133. The [Page 4] seventh from Abraham, the father of the faithfull, 1 Chron. 6.1, 2, 3. and 2.1. and 1.34. As Enoch was the seventh from Adam the father of the world, Iude 14. When Moses was borne he was very fair, Act. 7.20, 21, 22. He was marvellously saved from death being drawne out of the water, whence his name MOSES, i. e. Drawn-forth, was given to him, Exod. 2 10 He was nourished by King Pharao [...]s daughter for her own sonne, Ex. 2.9, 10. Act. 7.21. Learned in all the wisedome of the Egyptians, and mighty in words and in deeds, Act. 7.22. He lived in Pharaohs Court 40. years, and then left the Court, choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, &c, Act. 7.23. Heb. 11.24, 25, 26. He was a stranger, a shepheard in the land of Madian 40. years, Act. 7.29.30. Exod. 3. thence God called him to feed Iacob his people, and Israel his inheritance. He fed Israel most faithfully 40. years, Numb. 12.7. Heb. 3.2.5. being in the Church in the wildernesse, Act. 7.38. with the Angel that spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers, where he received the lively Oracles [Page 5] to give unto us, and commanded us a law which is the inheritance of the Church of Iacob, Deut. 33.4. Of all the Prophets that arose in Israel, there was none like Moses whom God knew face to face, Deut. 34.10. He dyed 120. years old, his eye not being dimme nor his naturall strength abated, and was buried of God, no man knowing of his sepulcher to this day. Deut. 34.5.6.7.
MOSES wrote the Law of God in the five first Bookes, called in Greek the Pentateuch, i. e. The five-fold-volume. At first it seemes to be written in one volume or Roll, there being such a continued connection of Book with Book, Exod. 1.1. Levit. 1.1. Num. 1.1. Deut. 1.1. But was afterwards, according to the several subject matters therin contained, divided into five severall Books, Containing 1 An History of things past: 2 A Covenant between God and his Church then present: 3 And a Prophecy of further grace to come, now exhibited by Iesus Christ, Deut. 18.15. &c. Iohn 5.46. and 1.17. In Propounding of which things, (as Ainsworth observes) Moses hath a veile upon his glorious [Page 6] face: for in the Histories are implied Allegories, Gal. 2.24. And in the Lawes are types and shadows of good things to come; the body whereof is of Christ, Heb. 9.9. and 10.1. Col. 2.17. In Genesis (which History endeth with Israels going downe into Egypt,) we have the image of a naturall man, fallen from God into the bondage of sin. In Exodus, is the type of our Regeneration, and State renewed by Iesus Christ. In Leviticus the shadow of our mortification, whilst we are made sacrifices unto God. In Numbers, our spirituall warfare, whereunto we are mustered, and armed to [...]ight the good fight of faith. In Deuteronomie, the Doctrine of our sanctification, and Preparation to enter into our heavenly Canaan, after Moses death, by the conduct of Iesus the son of God. So H. Ainsworth in his Preface before his Annotat. on Gen. &c.
Genesis.
I GENESIS i. e. Generation, so called by the Greek; because it [Page 7] sets forth the Generations of the heavens & of the earth, in their first creation, Gen. 2.4. The Hebrews name their Books of the Old Testament, either 1 From the Prophets, the Penmen of them. Or 2 From the Principall subject or Argument handled in them: Or 3 From the first Hebrew word wherewith they begin, as the 5. Books of Moses, & the Lament. of Ieremiah. Hence Genesis is called in Hebrew [...] Bereschith i. e. In the beginning.
Penman. It is not probable this Book was written by Moses whilst a Private man, and a shepheard in Madian, in the desert: but rather after he was a Publick person, and furnished with a Prophetick spirit; otherwise the credit and authority of this History would be too much enfeebled. Nor is it absurd which some Hebrew writers think, who referre this writing to that of Exod. 24.12. Come up to me into the mount, and be thou there, and I will give thee the Tables of stone, and the Law, and the Precepts, which I have written to teach them. Understanding by the Tables, the Decalogue: by the Precepts all the Ceremoniall, [Page 8] and Iudiciall Ordinances: and by the Law all other writings of Moses, whether Historicall or Dogmaticall, D. Paraeus in Prolegom. in Genes. p. 14.15. in fol.
This Book as it is absolutely the ancientest writing extant in the world: so it is most compendious; being an History of 2369 years, as Ainsw. thinks, or rather of 2368 as Iunius and Paraeus comput. Iun. Annot. in Gen. 1. Parae. Prologom. in Genes. This may appeare in three eminent Intervals or Periods of time recorded in Genesis. viz.
The scope of Genesis, is to set forth, The Generation of the world: The corruption thereof by sin: The Restauration thereof by Christ the seed of the woman, together with the Government of the old world before the flood, and the foll [...]ing world after the flood, especially of the Church of God in particular families in both.
Principall parts of this Book. In Genesis are described▪
Exodus.
II EXODUS. i. e. Going-out; or Departure, so called by the Greek, because it declares Israels Departure out of Egypt, after they had been long-oppressed there under Tyrannicall servitude. In Heb. [...] veelleh schemoth, i. e. And these are the names, Exod. 1.1.
Scope; To set forth Gods governing and ordering of his Church, now reduced and united into one body, out of all the severall families of Israel. This is the Church in the wildernesse, Act. 7.38.
Exodus is an History, from the death of Ioseph till the erecting of the Tabernacle, for about 142. years. viz. From death of Ioseph to the birth of Moses, 60 years. As Iunius computes. Annot. in Ex. From Moses birth to the Departure out of Egypt. 80 years, Exod. 7.7. From the departure out of Egypt, to the erecting of the Tabernacle two years [Page 15] Exod. 40.17. in the second yeare. viz. the second yeare after their coming out of Egypt. Iun. Annotat.
Principal Parts of this Book. Exodus contains an Historicall Narration of
Leviticus
III LEVITICUS. So denominated by the Greek, from the chiefe Subject or matter of the Book, which principally describes the lawes, sacrifices and services of the LEVITICAL Priesthood. It is stiled among the Hebrewes [...] Vajikra. i. e. And he called. This being the first Hebrew word in the Hebrew text, beginning this book.
Scope of this Book. To make known Leviticall Lawes Sacrifices and Ordinances, and by those shadows to lead Israel by the hand to Jesus Christ the true Priest and sacrifice of the Church, See Levit. 11.44. and 20.26.
This Book relates the memorable words, Acts and Leviticall Ceremoniall Laws made known from God to Israel, for one Moneths space viz. from about the beginning of the second yeare, after Israels departure out of Egypt, the Tabernacle being already reared, till the beginning of the second moneth of the [Page 19] same yeare, As Jun. in Annot. compare Exod. 40.17. with Numb. 1.1. which was in the yeare, from the worlds Creation, 2514. As Ainsw. computes.
Principal Parts. Leviticus describes the sacred Ceremoniall law▪ 1. Of things. 2. Of Persons. 3. Of Actions.
I. The Ceremoniall law of things, c. 1. to c. 8. either according to the substance of them, as of 1. Burnt-offerings, c. 1. 2. Meat-offerings, c. 2. 3. Peace-offerings, c. 3. 4. Sin-offerings, in case of ignorance, c. 4. or of infirmity, c. 5. Or, according to the Rite and Ceremony of them, c. 6.7.
II. The Ceremoniall law of persons, c. 8. to 16. viz. 1. Of the Priests, In their consecration to their office, c. 8. In their discharge of their office, either according to Gods assistance, c. 9. Or mens infirmity, c. 10. 2. Of all the people, touching whom are lawes about their sanctification, both from uncleannesse without them, in matter of their food, c. 11. or In them▪ By reason of 1 Child-bearing, c. 12. 2 Leprosie, whereof its Rise and State, c. 13. Its cure, c. 14. 3 Issue of seed or bloud, c. 15.
III. The Ceremonial Law touching Actions, Necessary or Voluntary.
1. Necessary, whereof are laid down The Particulars and the Confirmation of them. 1 the Particulars of these Necessary [Page 20] Actions, are 1. In purification, Common to the whole Church, c. 16. Proper to every godly person, c. 17. 2. In Sanctimony or Holinesse, Both of the people; 1 To be observed, not only in their own bodies, c. 18. but also among one another mutually, c. 19. 2 To be maintained in their judgements, c. 20. As also in the holinesse of the Priests in their Persons, c. 21. Things, c. 22. 3. In exercise Ecclesiasticall, In legall Times c. 23. In legall Rites, c. 24. Politicall, c. 25. 2 The Confirmation or obsignation of these particular lawes, by Promises and Threats, c. 26.
2. Voluntary, viz. touching vows, c. 27.
Numbers
IV NUMBERS Gr. [...], so called because a great part of the Book is spent in Numbring the Tribes and Families of Israel, and of their journeys from Egypt to Canaan. In Hebr. its called [...] Bammidbar i. e. In the Desert▪ Because this is the first word of this Book in the Hebrew text.
Numbers containes an History from the beginning of the second moneth of the second yeare, after Israels coming [Page 21] [...]ut of Egypt, to the beginning of the eleventh moneth of the fourtieth yeare. viz. 38. years and upwards, as Iun. and Ainsw. observe. And this may remarkably be evinced, by comparing Numb. 1.1. and 36.13. diligently with Deut. 1.3. which, as above, demonstrate both the beginning and ending of this History of Numbers.
Scope. Lively to set forth the rich blessing of God upon Israel, in their wonderfull increase; his vigilant providence over them in all their wildernes journeyes and difficulties; and yet his severity against their corruption, for which many of them perished in the wildernesse, after they had been delivered out of Egypt, so that they could not enter into his rest because of their unbeliefe, Heb. 3.19. Iude ver. 5.
Principall Parts.
This Book of Numbers containes an Historicall narration of Israels 1 Preparation for their Journey, 2 Iourney it selfe, and 3 of their Station,
I. Israels Preparation for their Journey, wherein three things.
II. Israels journeys, which are distinguished by the history of their eight notable Murmurings in their way, viz. 1. Irksomenesse of their Journey. 2. Loathing of Mannah, c. 11. 3. Aarons and Miriams emulation against Moses, c. 12. 4. Their unbelief at Kadesh, where are recorded, Their murmuring c. 13. The judgement of God for it c. 14. Their reconcilement to God afterwards, c. 15. 5. The envy of the Levites and others against the Priests, c. 16. 6. The indignation of the people for the precedent judgement, where are set down both their Murmur [...]ng, c. 16.41, 42, 43. and their Reconcilement, c. 16. vers. 44. to the end, and c. 17, 18, 19. 7. Murmuring for want of [Page 23] water, c. 20. 8. Murmuring because of the way, and the light bread, and so were plagued with fiery serpents, c. 21.
III. Israels Station, State or condition when they were now nigh to the possession of their inheritance, c. 21. to the end of the Book. Here is set down a double State or Condition. 1. Of the people themselves. 2. Of their inheritance.
1. Of the people themselves, either as 1. overcoming their enemies, and possessing the land, c. 21. 2. Tempted by Magicall Arts and inchantments, c. 22, 23, 24. 3. [...]nsnared with, and plagued for idolatry and fornication c. 25. 4. Reconciled to God and numbred for the entring upon the inheritance, c. 26. 5. Furnished with a new Governour Ioshuah, that was to succeed Moses, c. 27. 6. Instructed in sacred things, Necessary, c. 28, 29. Voluntary, c. 30.
2. Of the inheritance, which is considered, either 1. In part, As possessed, c. 31. As assigned to Gad, Reuben, and halfe the Tribe of Manasseh, c. 32. (Here by way of digression is a summary recapitulation of the severall stations of Israel in their march through the wildernesse, c. 33.) 2. In whole, And that either, As it is circumscribed with Bounds or Borders, whereof the manner of dividing the land, c. 34. Or as it is circumscribed with lawes, Both of refuge for the man-slayer, that slew any unawares, c. 35. [Page 24] And of successions in their inheritances. c. 36
Deuteron:
V DEUTERONOMIE i. e. The second law, or Law repeated, Thus denominated by the Greek, because this book containeth a Repetition of Gods law given by Moses to Israel, AS in Hebrew it is sometimes from the same ground called [...] mischneh i. e. Repetition of the law. From the first words in the Book its cal'd [...] Elleh Haddebarim, i e. These are the words, or only [...] Debarim, i. e. The words.
Penman of this Book, as of all the foure former Books was Moses, who also wrote the History of his own death aforehand in the last chapter by a Prophetick spirit; or Ioshua wrote it for him. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 118.
This Book containes the History of but a few dayes, viz. from the beginning of the eleventh moneth, to about the seventh day of the twelfth moneth of the fourtieth yeare, after Israels departure [Page 25] out of Egypt, for Moses began to speak these words, in the first day of the eleventh moneth of the said fourtieth yeare, Deut. 1.3. which was a little before his death; he died when he was one hundred and twenty years old Deut. 34.7▪ after which Israel mourned for Moses in the land of Moab thirty dayes, Deut. 34.8. this determines the time of the History? As Iun. well observes.
Thus Alsted in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 118. computes the time of this History. viz.
1. The first Part of this Book containes the History of the first day of the eleventh moneth of the fourtieth yeare, after their coming out of Egypt, c. 1, 2, 3▪ 4. 2. The second part contains the History of the second day, c. 5. to 11▪ 3. The third part containes the History, (as is probable) of foure dayes at most c. 11. to 26. 4. The fourth part containes the History of one day, c. 27.28. 5. The fifth containes the History also of one day, c. 29, 30. 6. The sixth containes the History of one day, c. 31. &c. 7. The 7th part contains the History of their mourning for Moses thirty daies c. 34.
[Page 26]Proofe hereof may be drawn from the History of Ioshua, by computing backwards from the day of the Passeover. For in the land of Canaan the first Passeover was celebrated, in the one and fourtieth year after Israels coming ou [...] of Egypt, on the fourteenth day of the moneth Nisan Josh. 5, 10. Before which they were circumcised, which probably took up foure dayes, Josh. 5. One day they were passing thorough Jordan, two dayes in preparation for it. Adde to these the time of searching out the land, and lastly the thirty dayes mourning. And thus going backwards, we shall find that Deuteronomie containes an History of but a very few dayes.
Scope. That the law formerly given of God may by this New Repetition of it be more declared, confirmed and applied to the present condition of Israel; and they thereby fitted and better prepared for the promised Canaan, upon which they were entring.
Principall Parts, are; The Preface; Narration; and Conclusion of the Book. I. Preface or Prologue, c. 1. to 5. contayning,
II Narrative containing the main bulk and substance of the book, c. 5. to 32. viz. The Law, and Confirmation thereof.
III. Conclusion of the whole book c. 32, 33, 34. Which is either,
IJ. THE PROPHETS.
THe PROPHETS wrote all the Bookes of the Old Testament, besides the Pentateuch of Moses. These Prophets inspired infallibly by the Holy-Spirit of Prophecy, wrote Books of three severall sorts, viz. 1 Historicall, 2 Dogmaticall or Doctrinall, and 3 Propheticall. The Hebrews thus distinguish the Books of the Old Testament. 1. [...] Thorah i. e. The Law. viz. the five books of Moses. 2. [...] Nebi [...]m i. e. The Prophets. The Prophets they distinguish into two sorts, viz. 1. [...] Nebiim Rishonim i. e. The former Prophets; perhaps so called because they treat of the first Prophets, These are foure, viz. Ioshua, Iudges, Samuel and Kings. And 2 [...] Nebiim Acharonim i. e. the later Prophets; which they reckon up in foure Books also. viz. Isaiah, Ieremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve minor Prophets which were anciently, joyned all in one volume, lest they through their smalnesse should [Page 30] be lost; That phrase seemes to favour this, It is written in the Book of the Prophets, Act. 7.42. the Prophet Amos being cited, which is one of the Minor, or lesser Prophets. 3. [...] i. e. The writings; by way of emphasis. See the Reason hereof in Rivet. Isag. ad sucr. scrip. c. 29. Sect. 16. The Greek cals these Books, [...]; Hagiographa i. e. The holy writings, upon some such ground. Of this sort are eleven in this order in Hebrew, Ruth; Psalmes; Iob; Proverbs; Ecclesiastes; Song of Songs; Lamentations; Daniel; Esther; Ezra; Chronicles; under Ezra comprehending Nehemiah, which sometimes is called the second of Ezra, and the two Books of the Chronicles being reckoned as but one Book.
But the former Distribution of the PROPHETS bookes into 1 Historicall, 2 Doctrinall, and 3 Propheticall, (being both more consonant to the matter of these books, and to the method of our Bibles) shall here be followed.
I. HISTORICAL BOOKS.
THE HISTORICAL BOOKS of the Prophets Relate the History of [Page 31] the Jewes, and of the Church of God among them, from the death of Moses, which was, when he was one hundred and twenty years old, Deut. 34.7. Ioseph Ant. l. 4. c. 3. In 2493 year of the world; Helvic. untill the Period of the Persian Monarchy, possessed by Alexander the Macedonian, called Alexander the great, who conquered the Persians, and got Dominion of Asia, about Ann. 3614 after the worlds Creation, Helvic. in Chronolog. So that these Books contain an History of about 1121 years continuance.
Of this History of the Jews, and of the Church of God, there are two Principall Parts or Periods; viz. 1. Of the Israelites Entrance into the promised land. 2. Of their Government and Condition, after that entrance.
Joshuah.
1. ISraels entrance into the promised land, is described in the Book of [Page 32] JOSHUAH. So called from the chiefe subject handled therein, viz. The Acts of Ioshuah, the successour of Moses, the Governour and chiefe Captaine of Israel, under whose conduct they conquered the Land; Divided it by Line and Lot among the Tribes; and possessed it, according to all Gods faithfull promises in that behalfe unto their Fathers, Josh. 21.43, 44, 45. & 23.14, 15.
Penman of this Booke some conceive to be Ioshuah, because it beares his name. But that Reason is not cogent; 1 partly because the Bookes of Iudges, Ruth, and Kings, bear their name, yet not Penned by them: 2 partly because the denomination of this Book is rather from the Subject matter, then the Author. Other thinke Eleazer the High-Priest (whose death is recorded Iosh. 24.33. Gathered together the chief materials of which this Booke is compiled. It being the Priests duty, to leave upon Record all memorable Ecclesiastical [Page 33] affairs for the benefit of after ages, and propagation of Religion. This more probable: but not certain. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 119. Iohan. Calvin. Argument. in Lib. Iosuae.
This book containes an History of almost eighteene yeeres. viz. From the death of Moses to the death of Joshuah. Iun. Arg. in lib. Iehosh. Gerh. loc. prim. de Scriptura. in exegesi. Sect. 125.
Scope. Of this booke to demonstrate Gods exact faithfulnesse in performing all his Promises made to the Fathers; that all his people may be encouraged to trust to him the better for ever▪ Iosh. 21.45. & 23.14, 15.
Principall parts.
In this Book is an History of Ioshuah's Life and Death.
II. Israels condition and Government after their entrance into the Promised Land. Which is Historically described, what it was. 1. Before their carrying away into Babylon. 2. During the Captivity. 3. After the Captivity.
I. Before their carrying away into Babylon, and that either under the Iudges, or the Kings.
I. Vnder the Iudges.
And here we have two Histories, viz. One Common and Generall: Another Particular.
Judges
I. THe Common or Generall History, is the Book of IUDGES, [Page 36] so called, not from the Authors of it, but from the subject matter of it, in Hebr. [...] Shophtim, i. e. Iudges.
Penman of this Book the Hebrewes thinke to be Samuel. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 119. O [...]hers thinke that every Iudge recorded the things acted in his owne dayes respectively: and that Samuel, or Ezra, or Ieremiah, or King Hezekiah, (whose men copied out some of Solomons Proverbs, Prov. 25.1.) collected and digested them into one volume. Hugo Cardinal [...]s in Prolog. in hunc. lib.
This book containes an History of Israels Politie, and the state thereof from the death of Ioshuah, till the Priesthood of Eli. How during that time Israel oftimes Apostatized from God, for which God delivered them into their enemies hands; but upon their conversion to him, he saved them by Iudges raised up from among their Tribes, out of their enemies [Page 37] hands. It is an History of about 299 years, which may be thus computed.
Scope of this book, to shew what happy Haleyonian dayes Gods Church enjoyes under pious magistrates. How severe God is against the sins, especially the idolatry of his own people: and yet how he remembers mercy in midst of severest judgements.
Principall parts. This book being a Glasse discovering Israels [Page 38] calamity, and the cause thereof their sin. Describes their sin;
Ruth
II THe particular History under the Iudges, is the Book of RUTH, so stiled from RUTH the Moabitesse, a Gentile (Moab being one of the incestuous sons of Lot Gen. 18.) concerning whom this Book treats, especially of her marriage with Boaz, whose Pedigree, by a Prophetick spirit, is brought down to K. David, Ruth 4.18. to the end, Ruth bearing to Boaz, Obed; the Grandfather of David, of whom according to the flesh Christ came, Matth. 1.5, 6. The Chald. Paraphrast thinks that Ruth was the daughter of Eglon King of Moab, but that is not proved by any Scripture, nor is it likely that a Kings daughter would marry a Stranger, and [Page 40] leave her native Countrey to seek bread in another land, saith Gerh. Augustine refers the time of this History, to the Beginning of the Kings. Aug. l. 2. de Doctrin. Christian. c. 8. Ioseph. l. 5. Antiq. and Hugo Cardinalis referre it to the time of Eli, the Priest. D. Kimchi in c. 1. Ruth. and other of the Rabbines (as some note) conceive; That, Boaz who married Ruth, was that Judge which is called Ibzan Judg. 12.8. who immediately succeeded Iephte. Iunius and Tremellius comparing this History of Ruth with Matth. 1.5. are of opinion, that this History fell out in the dayes of Deborah. Annot. in Ruth 1.1.
But its certaine it fell out in the time of the Iudges, Ruth 1.1. though the particular time perhaps cannot so punctually be demonstrated.
Penman of this History is not certainly knowne. Hebrews thinke Samu [...]l penned it. Alsted. in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 119.
[Page 41]Many Writers annex this Book of Ruth as an Appendix to the Book of Iudges, as they do the Lamentations, to the Prophecy of Ieremiah. Andr. Rivet. Isag. ad sacr. Script. c. 29. p. 501.
Scope of this Book. To delineate part of the Genealogy of Christ, Ruth 4.18. &c. compared with Mat. 1.5.6. And to shew that salvation by Iesus Christ belongs to sinners of the Gentiles, as well as to the Iewes: Christ deriving his line not only from Iewes, but also from Gentiles and sinners, for the raising up of their Hope and Consolation in him.
Principall parts. In this History are described.
II. Vnder the Kings.
And here we have three Histories compiled in six books viz. the two Books of Samuel, the two Books of Kings, and the two Books of Chronicles, which Histories set forth the State of the Kingdome of Israel three wayes. viz. 1. As the Kingdome was Vnited of which the two Books of Samuel. 2. As The Kingdome was Divided, of which the two Books of Kings. 3. As the Kingdom was both Vnited and Divided, of which the two Books of Chronicles. As Trelcatius in Oeconomiâ Bibliorum, well observes,: And as the matter of these Histories doth clearly evince.
I. The UNITED State of the Kingdome of Israel, is described what it was, both under the Kings. 1. By Election. and 2. By Succession. And how it increased and flourished whilest so united.
I Samuel
I UNder Kings by ELECTION, The kingdomes Condition is recorded in the I. Book OF SAMUEL. So called, either from the matter or subject herein handled. viz. The History of SAMUEL, which takes up a great part of the Book. As Alsted. in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 120. Or also from the instrumentall efficient cause, or Penman of this of this Book, Samuel being supposed to have penned this Book, till c. 25. David the rest. Gloss. ordinar. Iunius and Trem. are of opinion, that Samuel had a great share in penning of these two Books that bare his name; and that Nathan the Prophet, and Gad the Seer penned part thereof, from that intimation, 1 Chron. 29.29. which words of Samuel, Nathan [Page 44] and Gad seem to be the two Books of Samuel, penned by them three. Iun. in Annot. in 1 Chron. 29.29. By the Greek and Latin, it is also called the 1. Book of Kings, because the later part of it containes the History of Saul, the first King of Israel.
This history treats of the last Judges, viz. Eli, and Samuel, and of the first King, viz. Saul. Declaring when and upon what occasion the Lord changed the government by Iudges into a Regall government, viz. In days of Samuel, and upon occasion of the extreame wickednesse of both Elye's and Samuels Sons, c. 1. to 9. As also how Saul carryed himselfe both in life and death: and how God prepared David for the Throne, Saul being rejected. It is an history of about 80 yeeres continuance. viz. Under Ely 40 yeeres, 1 Sam. 4.18. And under Samuel and Saul 40 yeeres, Act. 13.21.
[Page 45] Scope. To discover mans mutability, but Gods immutability in all the Revolutions and alterations of Families, and Common-wealths: viz. In their Constitution, Administration, and Alteration.
Principall parts.
This booke treats of the affaires of Israel under a double kind of civill Government,
II Samuel
II UNder Kings by SUCCESSION. In this respect the Kingdome's state is declared in the II. of SAMUEL. So called for Reasons formerly mentioned. Its also by the Greek and Latin stiled The second Book of Kings, because therein the History of David the second King of Israel is continued.
This is an History of about 40 yeeres continuance, 2 Sam. 5.5. An History of Davids Kingdome. may well be called The Annals of David.
Penman; some thinke to be the High-Priest; or some Disciple of Samuel, who yet for honours sake gave the Booke his Masters name. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 120. But rather it is probable that the latter part of [Page 48] the I. Of Samuel; and this whole Booke of the II. Of Samuel, were Penned by Nathan the Prophet, and Gad the Seer. 1 Chron. 29.29.
Scope. To declare Gods Faithfulnesse in delivering of his own from distresses. That divers great infirmities are incident to Gods uprightest servants. And That (like checker-worke) their prosperity is intermingled with crosses and calamities.
Principal Parts. In this Booke; (which is a description of Davids Kingdome) we have a Narration of Davids 1 Life and 2 Death.
[Page 50]II. The DIVIDED state of the Kingdome of Israel, and how upon that division it decreased and came to ruine, is laid down in the two Books of Kings.
This d [...]vision and decay of the Kingdome is laid downe two wayes. 1. According to the causes and Beginnings thereof. 2. According to the Progresse thereof.
I Kings
I. ACcording to the causes, and first beginnings of this Division and decay thereupon ensuing. These are set forth in the I. of KINGS. This book is stiled in [...] 1. Melacim. i. e. 1. Of Kings. By the Greek and Latine the III. of Kings. The history of the Kings both of Iudah and Israel, being the subject matter of the book.
[Page 51]In this book the causes and first beginnings of the Kingdomes division and decay are laid downe, partly by way of Opposition of the flourishing state of Davids kingdome united under Solomon, c. 1. to c. 11. Partly by way of Exposition of the occasions (viz. Solomons sinnes, Gods justice, Solomons death, c. 11.) and of the first beginnings of the division and decay of the kingdome under Rehoboam, to whom onely two Tribes were left subject, Iudah and Benjamin, 1 King. 11.21. And under Ieroboam to whom the other tenne Tribes revolted: and afterwards under their successours severally. So that in this book are the Acts of five Kings of Iudah after Solomon, viz. Rehoboam, [...]bijam, Asa, Iehoshaphat, Iehoram: and of eight Kings of Israel, viz. Ieroboam, Nadab, Baasha, Elah, Zimri, Omri and Tibni, Ahab, Ahaziah.
[Page 52]This is an history of 118. yeeres viz. Under Solomon 40 yeeres, 1 King. 11.42. Under the rest of Kings of Iudah, 78. yeeres, for Rehoboam Reigned 17 yeeres. 1 King. 17.31. — Ab [...]jam 3 yeeres. 1 King. 15.2. — Asa, 41. yeeres. 1 King. 15.10. — Iehoshaphat, 17. yeers. 1 King. 22.51. — In all 118 yeeres.
Penman of this book, and also of the second booke of Kings is conceived not to be any one man, but divers. Though the Hebrewes would have them to be written by Ieremiah. Others think that the Churches history, which was written by divers, was digested and collected into volumes, either by E [...]ra; Gerh. loc. Com. 1 de Scriptura. in Exegesi. §. 129. Or by the chiefe Priests and Prophets as the Churches Pub. Actuari [...]s. Alsted Proecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 120. However, it seemes evident, that the beginning of 1. of [Page 53] Kings, touching Solomons Reign, was written by Nathan, Abijah and Iddo, 2 Chron. 9.29. See Iun. in loc. And other parts by Iehu son of Canani, 2 Chron. 20.3. See Iun. Annot▪ ibid. And by the Prophet Isaiah, (as Iunius thinks▪) partly in his Prophecy, par [...]ly in the Book of Kings, 2 Chron. 26.22.
Scope. To shew how the Piety of Kings, preserves their kingdomes in unity, and flourishing Prosperity: But the sins and wickednesse of Kings, especially their idolatry, whereby they divide themselves from God, brings Divisions into their Kingdomes, and consequently ruine upon themselves, their families and Dominions.
Principall parts, might be pointed out, according to the periods of every severall Kings reigne, but rather thus. This book containes the increase and decrease of the kingdome of Israel.
II Kings
2. ACcording to the Progresse and Growth of the Kingdom's division, and the miserable calamities, growing and increasing thereupon, This is related in the 11. of KINGS called in Hebr. [...] 11. Melacim, i. c. The second of Kings, By the Greek and Latin, The IV. of Kings. The History of the Kings being still continued in this Book.
This Book is an History of about 320. years, under 12. Kings of Israel, and 16. Kings of Iudah.
Penmen of this 11. of Kings, See in Penmen of 1. of Kings.
Scope; to delineate Gods verity in his Promises and Threats, together with his severity in his judgements. The continuall Revolution of Families and States, The mischief of sin, especially in Magistrates, dividing them and their people from God, and consequently themselves amongst themselves, till both Kings, people and Kingdomes be ripe and ready for desolation.
Principall parts, may be considered either according to the Reign of the severall Kings of Israel and Iudah, as afore. Or as followeth; This Book declareth.
[Page 59]The state of the Kingdomes of Israel and Iudah; together with their defection and declining,
III. The UNITED and DIVIDED State of the kingdome is laid downe in the two Books of Chronicles, with some further Additions and Amplifications to the former Histories. This is done two wayes.
I Chron.
1. ACording to the UNITED State of the kingdome in I. OF CHRONICLES, so called because the Acts of former times are herein Recorded, or Chronicled. In Hebr. [...] Dihre Haijamim, i. e. THE WORDS OF DAYES, because they are as a Sacred DIARY; reporting the Acts and Occurrents in the Church of God, and Civil States both Domestique and Forrein. Munsterus not unfitly stiles them Libros Annalium, i. e. The Books of Annals. Annals barely declaring matters of fact for divers years in order; as, Gellius notes l. 5. N. A. c. 18. These two Books are the CHVRCHES ANNALS. In Greek these two Books are called [...], Bibloi Paralipomenon, i. e. The Books of things omitted: or, THE BOOKS OF REMAINES: [Page 60] because some things omitted, or not fully described in the Pentateuch, Ioshuah, Iudges, Ruth, Samuel and Kings, are here Summarily explicated, and supplyed.
This I. of Chron. Principally insists upon the History of David, Relating his Genealogy from the first Adam and so forwards towards the second Adam; wherein the 12. tribes and their families, &c. are recorded c. 1. to 10. And his famous Acts c. 10. to the end of the Book; so that this Book is a Compendious Chronology of all the former Books to the Books of Kings, of things from the worlds Creation, till about the yeare 2985. viz. of
[Page 61] Hierom calls the Chronicles, Instrumenti veteris Epitomen, &c. The Epitome of the Old Testament; and that it is of such Consequence, that whosoever would arrogate to himselfe the knowledge of the Scriptures without it, doth but mock and abuse himselfe. Hieronym. in Ep. ad Paulin. And again stiles it, Totius divinae Historiae [...], i. e. The Chronicle of the whole Divine History. Hier. in Prolog. Galeat.
Penman of this and the second Book is uncertaine. R. Salomo. R. D. Kimchi, think it was Ezra. Saith Alsted in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 120. Iunius also is of the same judgement. Iun. Annot. in 1 King. 11.41. and in his argument before 1 Chron. The Argument that generally inclines them all to this opinion, is, That the same words which are used in the close of the Chronicles 2 Chron. 36.23. are also used in the beginning of Ezra. Ezr. 1.1, 2, 3.
Scope. The primary Scope of this Book seemes to be this; Clearly to describe the Line and Genealogy [Page 62] of CHRIST, the Messiah promised to David, Abraham, and Adam: That when in fulnesse of time Christ should be revealed and performed; the Church might infallibly know, that he was the Promised SEED OF THE WOMAN.
Principall Parts. This first Book of Chron. describes the Israelitish kingdome in its 1 Foundation, and 2 Administration.
II Chron:
2. ACcording to the UNITED and DIVIDED state of the kingdom in the II of CHRONICLES. So called for the reasons formerly alledged.
This booke relates the history of the Israelitish State from the beginning of king Solomons Reigne, till their returne from the Babylonish Captivity, which fell out about the first yeare of Cyrus king of Persians. Setting down both the union and flourishing condition of the kingdome, under Solomon. but the division and decay of the kingdome thence ensuing, till it came to utter ruine. So this book contains an History of about 472 yeeres.
So that this book is an Epitome or Chronicle of the two Books of Kings, with Additions. If we consider the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles, all together, they containe an Historicall Narration, How the kingdome of Israel 1 Began under Samuel: 2 Increased under David: 3 Flourished under Solomon: and 4 Failed under Zedekiah; thus it endured almost 565 yeers.
Penman, see in 1. of Chron.
Scope, For substance the same with that of the two books of Kings.
Principall parts.
This book containes an Historicall Narration of the kingdome of Israel's,
II. After the people of Israels CAPTIVITY in which regard we have their REDUCTION, or bringing back from the Captivity of Babylon Hystorically declared: And that two wayes. 1. According to the truth and manner of it. 2. According to the fruit and event of it.
Ezra.
1 THe truth and manner of Gods peoples RETURNE FROM BABYLON, is contained in the book of EZRA. So called from [Page 67] Ezra the Penman of it; whose Acts also are the chief subject-matter of it. Some count and call Ezra a Prophet. Lactant. lib. 4. Iust. c. 11. but Augustine doubts whether he may be called a Prophet, Aug. l. 18 de Civit. Dei c. 36. Hierome saith he was Iosedech, whose son was Iesus the High-Priest. See Ludovic. Viv. in Lib. 18 de Civit. dei. c. 36. But how can he be denyed to be a Prophet, when Christ himselfe stiles all the books of the Old Testament Moses and the Prophets, Luk. 16.29.31?
This is certaine, Ezra was a Priest, Ezr. 7, 11, 12. He was of the house and linage of Aaron; see his pedigree, Ezr. 7.1.2, 3, 4, 5. A most expert and ready Scribe in the Law of Moses, Ezr. 7.6, 10, 11. He was sent with Commission by Artaxerxes from Babylon to Ierusalem, &c. ver. 11. &c.
Zerubbabel restored the Temple: Ezra the worship of God: Nehemiah the City Ierusalem.
This book, and that of Nehemiah following, are by the Hebrewes, [Page 68] reputed as but one volume, and that is called by them the I. of Ezra, this the II. of Ezra. Hieronym. in Epist. ad Paulin. and Lactant. Instit. l. 4. c. 11. The Greek and Latin divide them (as our English) into two books, the former being ascribed to Ezra, the latter to Nehemiah. The Book of Ezra, in Order well followes the Chronicles; for the very words which conclude the Chronicles, 2 Chron. 36. last, do begin this Book of Ezra, Ezra 1.1, 2, 3. not only intimating, that Ezra was probably Penman of them both, but also that in this Book the History is continued. In Ezra is declared the Iewes returne from Babylon. And it is an History for about 146. years, viz. From the Edict of Cyrus, to the nineteenth year of Artaxerxes Mnemon. As Iunius computes, of
Scope. To evidence how punctually faithfull and alsufficiently able God is, in performing of his Promises to his Church and people in their season, touching their deliverance and Restauration, against all impediments, improbabilities and seeming impossibilities. For he made Cyrus an heathen King his shepheard, and nursing father to his Church, to bring them out of Babylon, wherein they were as helplesse and hopelesse, as dead bodies or dry bones in a grave. Ezek. 37. 2, 3, 11, 12, 13. To build the Temple and Ierusalem, Isa. 44. 28. and 45. 1. &c. compared with Ezra 1.1, 2. &c.
Principall parts. In this Book are laid downe, touching the Jewes returne,
Nehemia:
II. THe Fruit and Event of the Jews RETURNE FROM BABYLON, is laid down in the Book of NEHEMIAH. So called, 1 partly because Nehemiah was Penman of it, Neh. 1.1. 2 Partly because the Acts of Nehemiah are the Principall subject-matter of the Book, Nehemiah being the great Repairer & Restorer of the holy City Ierusalem. It is by some called the II. of Ezra; because the History begun by Ezra touching the Iewes returne from Babylon is here continued. Nehemiah is supposed to aeb the same who is called the Tirshatha [Page 71] Ezr. 2.63. So Munsterus. Neh. 8.9. which signifies, a Cup-bearer, Gerh. exeg. in loc. 1. de Scrip. §. 132. but in the Chaldee tongue is a Title of Dignity and Honour. R. Aben Ezra. saith Gerh. Translated Legatus Regis; i. e. The Kings legate, Ambassadour or Commissary. by Iun. & Trem. (who yet interpret this rather of Shazbazzar, whom many think to be Zerubbabel:) In the margin of our English Bibles it is rendred, Governour. He was the son of Hachaliah, Neh. 1.1. and Cup-bearer to King Artaxerxes, in the twentieth yeare of his Reigne, Neh. [...].11. and 2.1. The kings Palace was at Shushan, Neh. 1.1. that being the Metropolis of Persia, which Darius Hystaspis built. Plin. N. H. l. 6 c. 27.
In this Book are declared the happy fruits of the Jews returne both in reference to the Politique and Ecclesiastick state. It contains an History of about 55 years, as Gerh. Loc. Com. Supradict. & Iunius in Annot. shew. viz.
Scope, To let us know how deep and desperate the distresses of the Church may grow, before God will restore her. How difficult, slow and perplexed a work the work of Reformation is, both by reason of adversaries to be opposed, and Publick corruptions to be removed. How easily and wonderfully God can bring Reformation to perfection against all impediments whatsoever, when he is resolved to carry it on. What excellent and usefull instruments, pious and faithfull Magistrates are for the accomplishing both of Civil and Ecclesiasticall Reformation; Nehemiah being a lively Patterne of a true Reformer indeed.
Principall parts. This Book sets forth the Restauration of Hierusalem, and this By.
Esther.
III. VNder the IEWES CAPTIVITY in Babylon, and other places out of Iudea; The condition [Page 74] of the Church is described in the Book of ESTHER; stiled by the Hebrewes [...] megillath Esther, i. e. The volume of Esther, so denominated from Esther the Queen a Iewesh, whose faithfull service, done for the oppressed Church and people of God in extremity of straits, is the primary subject of this Book. Some writers exclude this Book out of the Canon of Scripture, as Melito in Eusebius, lib. 4. c. 25. Athan [...]sius in Synopsi. and Nazianzen. in Carm. de Script. But the Hebrews and primitive Christians with other writers unanimously receive it as part of the Canon.
Penman is not so unanimously determined upon among Authors. Some thinks it was written by the men of the great Synagogue. R. Moses is said to be of this opinion. Or by Ioachim the Priest, sonne of Iesus the High-Priest. Philo Iudeus in Chronol. Or, by Mordecay, as is conjectured partly from chap. 9.20, 23. As The Latin Fathers. The ground of whose conjecture seemes to come short. Or by Ezra or Nehemiah, [Page 75] who wrote the two former Histories of the Church of like Nature. Isidorus. Alsted. Praecog. Theol l. c. c. 120. But Eusebius in his Chronicles, supposeth that the Penman was after Ezra.
This Book containes an History of the Church under the Reigne of Ahashuerus King of Persia, from the third yeare of his Reigne, Esth. 1.1, 2, 3. till the end of his Reigne, viz. about 20. years (for he reigned in all about 21. or 22. years) This Ahashuerus is conceived to be Xerxes sonne of Hystaspis, Ezr. 4.6. Iun. Annot.
The time of this History is thus computed.
Ahashuerus makes his feast in his third yeare, — Esth. 1.3.
Marrieth Esther, in his seventh yeare, Esth. 2.16.
Haman conspires against the Iewes, and is hanged, in his twelfth yeare, Esth. 3.7. and 7.10.
Thence Esther reigns till the end of his Reigne, Mordecai being chief Governour, 10. y. Helvic. chron.
S [...]ope, most lively to manifest; How singularly vigilant God is over [Page 76] his Church in extreamest straits and deepest dangers; not only to preserve her from them, and advantage her by them; but also to returne the plots of her cruell enemies upon their own heads, when they are nearest execution.
Principall parts. This Book declares the Jewes deliverance from Hamans plot, both by what meanes and in what manner it was delivered.
II. DOCTRINAL BOOKS.
The DOGMATICAL, or DOCTRINALL Books. Thus farre of those Books which are more properly Historicall; Now of the Bookes which were written in the same times with the former, which declare to us the will of God in a more Doctrinall way, and therefore for distinction sake called, DOCTRINALL. They are also called the Poeticall Books, because it is conceived that they, or most of them in Hebrew were written in Metre, or Poeticall Measures; which now are not so easie to be found out.
These DOGMATICALL Books containe in them Doctrines. 1. Of more speciall and particular reference to some particular individuall person. 2. Or of more Generall reference and respect to all.
Job.
1. DOctrines of more speciall reference to a particular person ▪ are laid down in the Book of IOB. so called, because that precious man Iob and his various condition is the chiefe subject-matter of the Booke. Some think that there never was such a man in the world as this Iob of which this Book speaks: but account this booke rather Parabolicall, then Historicall. R. Moses Ben. Maimon in more Nebuchim part 3. §. 22. And Thalmud Ord. 4. Tract. 3. But this dreame is sufficiently refelled by that honourable mention that is made of this renowned Iob in other Scriptures both in Old and New Testament Ezek. 14.14, 20. Iam. 5.11.
Who this Iob was, is more doubted.
1. Some thinke that Iob came of [Page 79] Nahor Abrahams brother, and that he was the third from Nahor: thus; Nahor—Vz—rIob; and that he lived about that time that Israel was in Egypt. Alsted. Chron. p. 100 and p. 115. and p. 502. And Hieronym. in Q. Hebr. Tom. 4. fol. 96. Seemes to incline hereunto, especially, seeing Iob is said to dwell in the Land of Vz, Iob 1.1. and Vz was one of Nahors sonnes, Gent 22. [...]1. But that Land seems not to have received its name of Vz coetaneous to Abraham; but rather from Vz son of Aram, Sem's Nephew presently after the flood, Gen. 10.23. As Gerh. well notes, in exegesi. loc▪ Com. de Scrip. §. 136.
2. Others rather are of opinion, that Iob is the same which Iobab King of the Idumeans, of the race of Esau Gen. 36.34. And that [...] might be changed into [...]; the name Iobab into Iob; either from the custome of the Hebrew tongue, which ofttimes changeth one letter for another; or from the Aramick, Idumean, or other dialect of the Country [Page 80] where he sojourned; or from the change of his condition in the world; while prosperous he might be called Iobab, the letter being doubled; when in distresse his name contracted into Iob. See the like in case of Abraham, Gen. 17.5. Of Naomi, Ruth 1.20.
This latter opinion is urged by Arguments not to be neglected. 1. From the circumstances of place. Iobab lived in the Land of Idumea, Gen. 36.33. Iob in the Land of Vz, a chiefe tract in Idumea, Iob 1.1. Lam. 4.21. Hence Kings of Edom are called Kings of the Land of Vz, Ier. 25.20. 2. From description of their possessions, Iobab had Regall Majesty Gen. 36.33. Iob had a Princely state, not usuall to private men, Iob 1.1, 2, 3. And also Princely Dignity, Habit, and Office, Iob 29.9, 12, 14. 3. From Similitude of names. As Moses reckons up among Esau's sons, one Eliphaz who brought forth one Theman builder of a Town of his own name, Gen. 36.10, 15. So Iobs History [Page 81] mentions, Eliphaz the Temanite Iob 2.11. Many Authors, as the LXX interpret. at the end of Iob. Euseb. demonstr. Evangel. l. 1. c. 5. Ambros. in Com. in Rom. 9. August. de Civit. dei, l. 18. c. 47. Gerh. quo supr. § 134. vid. Mercer. in Praefat in Lib▪ Iob & Com. in Iob 1.1
Penman of this book is not certainly known. Some think it was Solomon; but that's scarce probable, Iob living so long before Solomon, and many Penmen of Holy Scripture intervening betwixt them. Some that Iob penned this book himselfe, because the expressions and speeches of Iob are laid down in such emphaticall and patheticall terms. Some rather thinke that Moses wrote Genesis and Iob about the same time, viz. a little before Israels departure out of Aegypt, in the yeare of the world, 2452. Alsted. Chron. p. 100. R. Solomon, and other Hebrewes favour this opinion.
Scope, To evidence as in a mirrour the wise, just and fatherly Providence of God to his own faithfull [Page 82] and upright servants, even in midst of manifold, deepest, strangest and longest afflictions. Hebrewes say, Iob's calamity lasted 12 moneths. Suidas saith, seaven yeeres.
Principal Parts. In this book Iobs threefold condition is described viz. His Prosperity, His Adversity, and his recovery out of all his distresses.
2. Doctrines of more generall reference unto all sorts of persons, are contained partly in Davids, partly in Solomons Books, whereof some were written originally in prose, others in Metre, Trelcat. in Oecon. Bibl.
Psalmes.
1. IN Davids Book viz. That which was (if not wholly, as some thinke, August. de Civitat. Dei, l. 17. c. 14. Yet) principally Penned by David, i. e. THE BOOK OF PSALMES. It is called in Hebrew, by the latter Hebrewes (who gave names or Titles to Books, [...] Sepher Tehillim. i. e. The Book of Hymnes, or Prayses: because the Divine Praises of God are the chiefe subject-matter of the Psalmes. In the Old Testament, THE PSALMS OF ISRAEL 2 Sam. 23.1. Because penned for the use of the Israel of God. In the New Testament, [...] The PSALMES Luk 24.44. And [...] i. e. The BIBLE or BOOK OF PSALMES, Luk. 20.42. Act. 1.20. Because the Psalmes are digested into one volume. [Page 86] The Greeke cals it also [...] i. e. The Psalter; from the Psaltery a musicall instrument, used in singing of the psalmes. Anciently it was called Soliloquium i. e. The Soliloquy; because it containes the Saints sweetest and secret talkings with God in prayers and prayses, and Gods with them in precious returnes. Parva Biblia, & Summarium V. Test. i. e. The little Bible, and the Summary of the Old Testament. Luth Totius Scripturae Epitome. i. e. The Epitome of the whole Scriptures. Athanas. in Epist. ad Marcel. It is a compendium of all divinity, a common shop of Medicines for the soule, an universall store-house of good Doctrines profitable to every one in all conditions. Basil in Psal. 1. By August. lib. Psalmorū Prol. its call'd Tutela pueris, juvenibus ornamentum, solatium senibus, mulieribus aptissimus decor. i. e. A safeguard for children, an Ornament to youth, a solace to aged men, and the fittest comelinesse for women. The psalmes are a Iewel made up of the Gold of Doctrine, [Page 87] of the pearles of comfort, of the Gemmes of prayer. This book is a Theater of Gods works. A sweet field and Rosary of promises. A Paradise of sweet fruits and heavenly delights. An ample Sea wherein tempest-tossed soules find richest pearles of consolation. An heavenly schoole wherein God himself is chiefe instructer. The abridgment, flower and quintessence of Scriptures. A glasse of divine grace, representing to us the sweetest smiling fatherly countenance of God in Christ. And a most accurate Anatomie of a Christian soule, delineating all its affections, motions, temptations, plunges with their proper remedies. Incipientibus primum efficitur elementum, proficientibus incremen [...]um, perfectis stabile firmamentum, totius Ecclesiae vox una. i. e. It is rudiment for the young, increase for the proficient, firm establishment for the perfect, its as but one voice of the whole Church. August. ibid.
In a word, Quid est quod non discatur in Psalmis? Non omnis magnitudo [Page 88] virtutis, non norma justitiae, non pudicitiae decor, non prudentiae consummatio, non patientiae regula, non omne quicquid potest dici bonum procedit ex ipsis? Dei scientia, perfecta praenunciatio Christi in carne venturi, & communis resurrectionis spes, suppliciorum metus, gloriae pollicitatio, mysteriorum revelatio. Omnia prorsus in his velut magno quodam & communi thesauro recondita atque conferta sunt bona. i. e. What is it that may not be learned in the Psalmes? Doth not the greatnesse of all vertue, the Rule of Righteousnesse, the gracefulnesse of charity, the Consummation of prudence, the law of patience, and every thing that may be called good, flow from them? The knowledge of God, the perfect Prediction of Christ to come in the flesh, the common hope of the Resurrection, the feare of punishments, the Promise of glory, the revelation of mysteries, yea all good things are hid and heaped together in these Psalmes, as in some great and common [Page 89] Treasury. Aug. in lib. Psalmorunt Prolog. For, if we look at the matter of the Psalmes, how rich is it! Consider,
In the Book of Psalms
Penmen of the Book of Psalmes are supposed by some to be many; and the Titles of divers Psalmes do import as much unto us. Ten Penmen are enumerated. viz. David, Solomon, Moses, Asaph, Ethan, Heman, Ieduthun, and the three sons of Korah; but Augustine thinks David was Penman of them all, de Civitat. dei l. 17. c. 14. However David penned greatest part of them, as the Titles and Testimonies in the New Testament do intimate.
Some thinke that Ezra after the Babylonish Captivity, collected these Psalmes, (before dispersed) into one volume. Some think this was done by King Hezekiah's friends or servants before the Babylonish Captivity, Athanasius in Synopsi.
Sum and Scope of the Psalms, seems to be. To set out the sweet entercourse [Page 91] and Communion betwixt God & his Church and people in all outward Conditions, and inward soul cases; how therin they are weak or strong▪ believe, hope, joy, lament, confesse, pray, vow, praise the Lord, &c. as occasion requires; and how God tries, delivers, comforts, supports, encourages, instructs, enables them, and faithfully deales with them, in all variety of their cases and conditions. But every particular Psalme hath his particular Scope; handling distinct matters upon distinct occasions. Some being penned before, some under, some after the Babylonish Captivity, as is evident.
Principal parts. This Book is by the Hebrews divided into five Books, viz.
This Division seems to arise from the peculiar close of these five Psalmes.
Or thus, The Psalmes are either 1 Directed from man to God, as the 1 Praying, and 2 Thankesgiving Psalms. 2 Or from God to man. As the Psalmes which are 1 Hortatory, 2 Consolatory, 3 Didacticall. 4 Propheticall.
The Particular unfolding of the Penman, Kind, Occasion, Matter, Scope and Principall Parts of every Psalme severally; will make a large Appendix to this Tract, and is reserved till some other opportunity.
2. In Solomons Books, (the wisest of Kings, 1 King. 3.12. & 4.29.) His Bookes are three, which according to the severall Doctrines, and matters comprised in them, we may distinguish into 1 Proverbiall, 2 Penitentiall and 3 Nuptiall. It is hard to say at what time these severall Books were penned by Solomon, yet perhaps the Nuptiall Book, was penned in his younger years, when his affections were more warme, active, lively in spirituals. The Proverbiall Book in his manly ripe age, when his [Page 93] prudence and parts were at highest, most grave, solid, setled: And the Penitentiall Book in his old age▪ after all the vaine courses which he had lost himselfe in, as the current of the Book seems clearly to evidence.
Proverbs.
1. HIs Proverbiall Book called the PROVERBS OF SOLOMON, because though it containe other's Proverbs, yet most are Solomon's Prov. 1.1. In Hebr. [...] Mis [...]le Shelomoh, i. e. either Similitudes, or excelling sentences, that overcome and beare rule over the rest, from mashal, which notes dominion.
This book was penned not by one, but by divers: and that not at one, but at severall times. Solomon penned the nine first chapters, in that Order, as they are, as also c. 10. to c. 25. Cartwright in loc. [Page 94] Solomon was Author of the Proverbs also, from c. 25. to c. 30. But the men of Hezekiah King of Iudah copied them out, Prov. 25.1. probably they collected them out of other writings of Solomon, and ranked them in this Order, wherein we now have them. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 120. Cartw. in Prov. 25.1. and Iun. ibid. who thinkes they extracted these Proverbs out of the Records of the Acts of Solomon, and digested them into a body; most of these Proverbs appertaining to Ethicall and Civil administration. The thirtieth chapter was penned by Agur sonne of Iakeh, c. 30.1. of him we read elsewhere no further mention in Scripture. He was a Prophet, Prov. 30.1. His Proverbiall Prophecy is annexed to Solomons Proverbs, perhaps because of mutuall resemblance between them.
The 31th chapter containes the Proverbiall instructions, with which Bathsheba trained up Solomon (here called Lemuel) in his tender [Page 95] years, which instructions King Solomon committed to writing afterwards. Iun. in loc. Cartw. in loc.
The Scope. To instruct men in true wisedome and understanding, the very head and height whereof is the sincere feare of the Lord, Prov. 1.2. to 8. To this end the Book is filled with choice succinct sententious Aphorismes, Adages, or Proverbs, compendiously holding forth duties of Piety to God, Equity to man, Sobriety towards ones selfe.
Generall Distribution of the Book take thus.
Ecclesi:
2. HIs Penitential Book, Solomons Retractations or Recantations, called in Hebr. [...] i. e. The WORDS OF THE PREACHER Eccles. 1.1. and to the same sense in Greek, Latin, and English, ECCLESIASTES, or The Preacher, because Solomon being furnished with wisedome and manifold experience touching the vanity of all things besides true Religion, preacheth the same to the Church for the instruction and warning of all Gods people: This Book he wrote in extream Old age, Repenting of his fall: This seemes to be one of his last Acts, according to that, 2 Chron. 9.29.
[Page 97] Scope of this Book is to evidence wherein a mans true happinesse consists. viz. not in any sublunary, naturall, created excellency, all such being vanity of vanities, extreamest vanity and vexation of Spirit; but only in true sincere feare of God, and truth of Religion, compare Eccles. 1.2. with Eccles. 12.13, 14.
Principall parts; To this end, touching true happinesse, he insists upon it,
[Page 98] This Book is an undeniable Argument of Solomons repentance after his Relapse, and consequently of his salvation.
Song of Songs.
3. HIs Nuptiall Book treating of the spiritual Contract, and Marraiage betwixt Christ and his Church, called the SONG OF SONGS, which was Solomons, c. 1.1. and CANTICLES, because of all Solomons Songs, which were 1005. 1 King. 4.32. This was the choycest and most excellent; the matter thereof being one of the sweetest spirituall mysteries. viz. the Churches spirituall espousals to, and Communion with Jesus Christ, that great mystery, Eph. 5.32.
[Page 99] Scope of this Song, is, (under the Metaphor or Allegory of lovers upon Contract, and intending marriage,) to shadow out to us that sublime spirituall happy union and Communion betwixt Christ and his Church, inchoate in this life, more imperfectly with the Iewes, more perfectly with the Gentiles: Consummate in the life to come. This is carried on dialogue-wise betwixt Christ and his Church; His friends and her Damosels, being the foure speakers, especially the two first. As is the Custome of a Bridegroome and a Bride.
Principall parts, of this Song of Songs.
III. THE PROPHETICALL BOOKS.
THus farre of Books Historicall and Doctrinal, Now to the Books Propheticall. For distinction sake they are called PROPHETICALL, because the matter of them is principally Propheticall, though many Historical and Doctrinal passages are also inserted in them all along; as there are many prophecies of things to come, dispersed up and down the other Books, which yet are principally Historical and Doctrinal.
These Prophetical Books are in all 16, (Lamentations being counted an Appendix to Ieremiah) they may be considered, 1. According to the times of their prophecy and writing. 2. According to their Order as set in our Bibles. They are not placed in our Bibles in that method and Order as they were at the first spoken and written by the prophets.
I. According to the times wherein they were [Page 104] first prophesied and written. These times are for most part discovered in the beginning of the severall Prophesies, and of such we may determine certainly: or they may be collected from other Scriptures, or the matter of the Prophesies, of which we cannot conclude altogether so cleerly.
These times may be referred (as the Historical books) to three principall Periods, viz. 1. Before, 2. Neere or under. 3. After the Babylonish captivity. And if in these three periods we parallel these Prophets, with those Historical Books, they will notably help to cleer and explain one another.
[Page 107]II. According to their Order as they are placed in our Bibles. And so they are resolved into two Ranks, viz. 1. The Greater Prophets, viz. The foure first (the Lamentations being annexed as an Appendix to Ieremiah,) so called, not because these had greater authority, then the others, but from the greatnesse of their Bookes; The prophecy of Isaiah, being neer as big or bigger then all the lesser prophets, together. 2. The Lesser Prophets. viz. The twelve latter, Hosea, &c. Which were digested into one volumne of old by the Jewes, (called the Booke of the Prophets, Act. 7.42.) some of them being very small, lest any of them should be lost. All these books are named from their Penmen, except the Lamentations.
I. The Greater Prophets, are [...]he Books of Isaiah, Ieremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel.
Isaiah
ISAIAH. This Book is set first, (though in time Ionah, Amos, Hosea, and Ioel, seeme to have been before him) perhaps, because of the excellency of the Prophecy, most frequently, fully and clearly prophecying of Christ, as if Christ had been exhibited already, had suffered already. Hence the Ancients called him Evangelisticus Propheta, & Propheticus Evangelista, The Evangelicall Prophet, and Propheticall Evangelist, Or the Evangelist and Apostle of the Old Testament. Christ and his Apostles greatly esteemed this Book▪ it being oftner alledged in the New Testament, then any other Book of the Old Testament▪ except the psalms. Some observe Isaiah to be quoted sixty times, the Psalmes sixty foure times. Alsted. Ethiopians had great respect to [Page 109] this Book as appears, Act. 8.27.28.
Time of this Prophecy was in foure Kings Reigns, Isa. 1.1. if we reckon from the death of Vzziah, Isa. 6.1. till the fifteenth yeare of King Hezekiah, when the Babilonish Ambassadours came to Hezekiah and saw all his Treasures, 2 King. 20. 12, 13, 14. He must at the least prophecy fourty five years: but its probable he prophecied longer.
Scope; To hold forth the true Messiah clearly, as the only sufficient Remedy against all sin and misery.
Generall parts, This Prophecy is either.
Jeremiah.
JEREMIAH. He was of the Towne of Anatho [...]h, Jer. 1.1. a very young man when he began to prophesie, Ier. 1.6.
Time of his prophecy was in days of Iosiah, Iehoiakin and Zedekiah, Jer. 1.2, 3. which must needs be fourty three years at least by computation, both in Iudea and Egypt.
Scope. To divorce the Iewes in his times from their many horrid sins, denouncig heavy judgemenas against them: But to comfort the true servants of God in their lowest misery, with promises of Christ, and threatnings against all their enemies.
Generall parts. Herein are
Lamenta:
UNto the prophecy of JEREMIAH may be annexed as an Appendix the Book of LAMENTATIONS. called in Hebr. [...] Kinoth, i. e. Lamentations; 2 Chron. 35.25. and [...] Echah, viz. the first Hebrew word of the Book (as many other Books are named by the first word of the Book). This Book seems to be penned by Ieremiah the Prophet, upon the death of that precious King [...]osiah, 2 Chron. 35.25. when the Jewes fell to their sinfull [Page 112] confidence in Egypt, which Beginnings of sorrows and miseries gave Ieremy occasion, (he knowing by the spirit of Prophecy the judgments which should befall them) to lament all the miseries from Iosiahs death, till the destruction of the Temple and Ierusalem, and captivity of the people in Babylon. The foure first chapters are penned alphebetically, (as many Psalmes are for help of memory in such an excellent piece as this is,) In 1.2, 4. chapters, every verse begins with a distinct letter of the Hebrew Alphabet, c. 3. hath only every third verse so beginning. Most mournefull melting, patheticall affections abound in the whole Book. Greg. Nazianzen. Affirmed thus of himselfe, As oft as I take this Book into my hands, and read the Lamentations, I perceive my speech to be stopped, and I am overwhelmed with tears, and methinks I see that Calamity as it were set before mine eyes, and I joyne Lamentations with Jeremiah; Greg. Nazianzen. Or. 12. pag. 202. Paris, 1630.
[Page 113] Scope, seemes to be this▪ Lively to point out the severity and impartiality of Gods judgements, even against his own dearest people the Iewes for their iniquities, inviting them to repentance, faith and prayer, for obtaining of Gods favour in pardoning of sin, and removall of judgement.
Principall parts. Are:
Ezekiel.
EZEKIEL. He was descended of the Priestly stock, Ezek. 1.3. Prophecyed in the land of Chaldea, to the Captives and Gentiles, in the fifth yeare of Iehoiachin's captivity, Ezek. 1.1, 2, 3.
Scope. To comfort the Church of God in Captivity, and to instruct them how to behave themselves therein, amongst [Page 115] profane Heathenish Idolaters.
Generall parts. Herein are,
I. The Preface setting forth the Prophets calling to this office; Gods call, c. 1. Ezekiels fearfulnes, c. 2. Gods confirming and strengthning him, c. 3.
II. The Prophecy it self, containing three Ranks of Sermons preached at severall times, to severall persons, &c. 1. To the Iews, whom he sharply rebuks & threatens for their impieties in seventeen severall sermons, c. 4. to c. 25. 2. To the enemies of Gods people, whose ruine and destruction he foretels in eight sermons, c. 25. to c. 33. 3. To the Jewes, exhorting them to repentance, and encouraging them to hope, not only for an inchoate deliverance from Babylons slavery, and that in six sermons, c. 33. to c. 40. But also for a consummate spirituall deliverance from spirituall misery by Christ the Messiah, and this is set out in vision 1 Of the new Temple to be erected, c. 40.41, 42. 1 Of the new Worship of God to be restored, c. 43.44. 3 Of the new Ierusalem, and new earth that should be discovered, c. 45.46, 47, 48.
Daniel:
DANIEL, Daniel was carried captive with the Jewes into Babylon, Dan. 1.6. living and prophecying among the Captives, a long time, foretold future events to the end of the world. Was a man of an excellent spirit, Dan. 5.12. Author of this Book, Matth. 24.15. Dan. 12.4.
Scope, To display unto Gods Church and people Gods wise and faithfull dealings with them in all states, from dayes of Nebuchadnezzar till Christ, for the comfort of the Iews, and from Christ to the end of the world, his peculiar Providence over his own in all their distresses and deliverances, for the comfort of the Saints under the New Testament.
Generall Parts. This book relates principally two sorts of matters, viz.
2 The Lesser Prophets or Minor Prophets so called, not because they had lesser Authority from [Page 118] God for their Propheticall office, but because their Books are of a farre lesse bulk and volume then the former. They are twelve, Hosea, Ioel, &c.
Hoshea
HOSHEAH. he was sonne of Beeri, Prophecyed the same time that Isaiah did, Hos. 1.1. with Isa. 1.1. 2. He prophecyed (as is probable) longer then any other of the Prophets; in all about seventy years. Principally deals against the ten Tribes of Israel, now and then against Iudah. His stile is sharp and succinct, which makes him somewhat more dark and obscure.
Scope, To convince the Iewes, especially the ten Tribes of their many great iniquities, especially of their idolatryes, and to perswade them to repentance with hope of mercy.
Generall parts. This Prophecy is either
Joel.
JOEL. Ioel was sonne of Pethuel, Joel 1.1. Some think this Pethuel was Samuel so called, i. e. A perswader of God, Because what he asked of God in Prayer, he obtained. Alst.
Scope; to convince the Iewes of their sins by occasion of an imminent famine [Page 121] and to draw them to repentance, holding forth many inviting promises to the penitent.
Generall Parts. This Prophecy is, 1. Comminatory, threatning a grievous famine (taking occasion thereof, by the Loc [...]sts Caterpillers, and Palmer wormes, the forerunners of a famine) labouring to make the people sensible of present evils, and sins the cause thereof▪ c. 1.
2. Hortatory, stirring them up to publique repentance, c. 2. ver. 1. to 19. Which Exhortation is urged, 1. By promises to his people both touching, Temporall deliverances from present evils, ver. 19. to 28. Eternall Evangelicall mercies in Christ, ver. 28. to the end of the chap. 2. By threats against their adversaries on every side, c. 3.
Amos.
AMOS. Amos an heardman of Tekoa, yet furnished with a Propheticall spirit, Amos 1.1. Severely denounceth judgements; is thought to be slaine by Amaziah the Priest.
Scope, To hold forth the severity of [Page 122] Gods judgements against his Churches enemies, and his Church it selfe; for their sins. Annexing some Evangelicall Promises to a Remnant.
Generall Parts Herein are,
Obadiah.
OBADIAH. Who he was, is not evident by Scripture, but only by this Booke, that he was a Prophet. He prophesied against the Edomites or Idumeans, who came of Edom, which is Esau, Gen. 36, 1.8, 19. and hated Israelites [Page 123] Iacobs race, as Esau hated Jacob himselfe.
Scope, To threaten ruine to the Edomites, for their enmity against the Israelites, and to comfort the Church with promised Salvation and deliverance in Christ.
Generall parts.
Jonah.
JONAH. He was son of Amitta [...], Ionah 1.1. Some call him The Prophet and Apostle of the Gentiles; because he was sent to preach to Ninive the Metropolis of the Assyrians, a Gentilish City. This Booke is chiefly Historicall.
[Page 124] Scope. To shew how God invited the City of Niniveh to repentance by Ionas preaching.
Generall parts.
Micah:
MICAH. He is described, Mic. 1.1. Coetaneous to Esay, imitator of Esay, compare them together. Prophecied in corruptest times.
Scope. To threaten destruction to Iudah and Israel for their great impieties fomented among them by their Rulers [Page 125] and Prophets; but to comfort the remnant of the Elect by Evangelicall Promises in Christ.
Generall parts.
Nahum,
NAHUM. He is described, Nah. 1.1. About same time that Ieremiah prophecyed in Iudea, Nahum prophecyed against Nineveh the Metropolis of Assyria, relapsing to impiety after Ionas his preaching; before Babylons Captivity.
Scope. To comfort the Iewes and [Page 126] the godly Israelites by the denouncing of judgments against the Assyrians, who under Pul, Tiglath-Pelesar, Salmanazar, Senacherib and Esarhaddon their Kings, grievously infested Israel: Esarhaddon carrying Israel Captive to Assyria in dayes of Mannasseh.
Generall parts.
Habakk:
HABAKKUK. As Nahum prophesied against Niniveh and Assyrians; so Habakkuk against both Iewes and Babylonians.
Scope. Both to warne the Iewes of their overthrow by the Chaldeans for their sinnes, and to comfort them afterwards by their enemies destruction, but their own life of Faith in deepest afflictions. The prophesy is laid down Dialoguewise.
Generall parts.
I. The prophets Complaint and Expostulation to the LORD against the extreame wickednesse of the Iewes, c. 1.2, 3, 4. II. The LORDS answer to the prophet, threatning great calamities to the Iewes by the proud destructive Caldeans. ver. 5. to 12. III. A second Expostulation of the prophet, against the cruel oppression of Iewes, as well good as bad, under the wicked blaspemous King of Caldeans, ver. 12. to the end of the chap. IIII. Gods second [Page 128] answer to the Prophet. 1. Directing the good to manage such deep afflictions under the Caldeans, viz. By living by Faith in hope of deliverance, c. 2.1, to 5. 2. Threatning to be avenged upon the Caldeans for all their wickednesse and cruelty against his people, ver. 5. to end of the c. V. The prophets sealing up the Doctrine of the life of Faith in his excellent prayer penned in his own and the Churches name, c. 3.
Zephania,
ZEPHANIAH. His stock, and the time of his prophecy is described, c. 1.1. He was coetaneous to Ieremiah, prophecied the same things for substance, but farre more briefly and succinctly. He prophesied against both Iewes and forraigne Nations.
Chiefe Scope. To Reprove the wickednesse of the Iewes, especially of the Princes and many of the people, for hankering after Idolatry, expecting it should be set up againe, Hiding their Idols; even [Page 129] after that glorious Reformation of King Iosiah. And to comfort the Elect remnant with Evangelicall promises, and Reformation by Christ.
Generall parts.
1. A most severe denunciation of desolation and other judgements to befall all sorts both in Jerusalem and Iudea, for their secret idolatries, oppressions and injurious coveteousnesse, c. 1. 2. An exhortation of the Jewes to Repentance and self-Reformation both the gracelesse Iewes and those that had some sparkes of Grace appearing in them. Partly by the exemplary formidable judgements which God would execute upon forraigne Nations in sight of the Iewes, c. 2. Partly by threatnings of judgements against Iewes themselves for their sins if they repented not, c. 3.1. to 8. 3. A sweet consolation made up of Evangelicall promises touching the calling of the Gentiles, Restauration of the Church, pardon of sins, Purity and everlasting glory by Christ, c. 3.8. to the end.
Haggai.
HAGGAI. Of him and the time of his prophecy, See Hag. 1.1.
[Page 130] Scope. To quicken the Iewes that had returned from the Babylon [...]sh Captivity, (being now extreame ingratefully dull in the worke of Reformation,) to lay aside all sluggish delayes and excuses, and to make haste with the repaire of the Temple.
Generall parts.
Zechariah
ZECHARIAH, His descent and the time of his Prophecy, See in Zech. 1.1.
Scope, To encourage and incite the people returned from Captivity, especially the Governours, Zerubbabel and Joshuah, to the building of the Temple.
Generall parts. This Prophecy seems to comprize the summe of five Sermons severally preached by the Prophet. viz.
Malachi.
MALACHI. he prophecyed after the Babylonish captivity, the Temple being now repaired, and the publike worship restored, against the many notorious corruptions remaining among them, even after such wonderfull mercyes. He is the last Prophet of the Old Testament, deciphering out in the close of his Book Iohn the Baptist, the first Prophet of the New Testament, Mal. 4.5, 6. with Luk. 16.16.
Scope. To call the I [...]wes, after this Reparation of Gods Temple and worship, to Repentance, from their many and foule corruptions; especially the comming of [Page 136] Christ the Messiah, the great Reformer and Refiner of his Church, being so neare at hand.
Generall parts. Besides the Title, herein are wrapped up in one continued Sermon, these principall matters.
Thus farre of the Old Testament, wherein the New Testament is veiled: Come we next to consider of the New Testament, wherein the Old Testament is Revealed.
THE NEW-TESTAMENT.II
THE NEW TESTAMENT, Revealing fully and cleerly the NEW COVENANT in Christ, and the Spirituall administrations thereof, is contained in the Books written since Christs manifestation in the flesh. In Reading of the Old-Testament, the veile is untaken away: — But (in the NEW TESTAMENT) the veile is done away in Christ. And we all with open face, beholding as in a glasse the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory. 2 Cor. 3.14.18. in the Books of the Old Testament, God describes to us, The Old Covenant of Grace in Christ veiled under [Page 140] Promises, Prophecies and Types: In the Books of the New Testament The Lord delineates to us The New Covenant of Grace in Christ unveyled, actually exhibited and performed; Christ being the body and substance of all those ancient Types and Shadowes, Iohn 1.17. Hebr. 10.1. Coloss. 2.17. The Center and meeting-place of all the Prophecyes and Promises, Luke 1.70. and 24.27. Acts 10.43. 2 Cor. 1.20.
The Bookes of the New Testament are either 1 Historicall. 2 Epistolicall, or 3 Propheticall, as further appears in the annexed Table. ☞
I. HISTORICAL BOOKS.
THE HISTORICAL BOOKS of the New Testament are such a [...] containe principally matters of Fact, though matters of Faith and Doctrine are also interwoven. The Histories of the New Testament, are I. Of Christ the head of the Church. II. Of the Church of Christ, his body.
The HISTORY OF JESUS I CHRIST himselfe is contained in the Foure Evangelists, wherein Christs Genealogy, Nativity, Life, Doctrine, Miracles, Death, Resurrection and Ascension, are described. Matthew, Mark, Luke and Iohn, are usually called by way of emphasis, The foure Evangelists, because they alone wrote the Evangelicall History of Iesus Christ. Matthew and Iohn were Apostles Matth. 10.23. Mark 3.18, 19. Mark and Luke were (though not Apostles, yet) holy Apostolicall men, the Apostles disciples, Companions and assistants in the work of the Ministry.
The generall and common Scope [Page 142] of these foure Histories, and of the writing of them is that which Iohn expresseth in particular, viz. That we might believe that Iesus is the Christ, the sonne of God; and that beleeving we might have life through his name, John 20.31. Particular ends, and occasions may be noted in the particular considerations of them.
This one History of Iesus Christ, is written by foure severall Penmen. The Reasons thereof are worthy to be inquired into.
Ancient writers (who much please themselves with the mysteriousnesse of Numbers) have excogitated divers; Some fetch a Reason from the foure Rivers of Paradise. Origen. Some, from the foure rings of the Ark wherein the the Tables of the law were contained, Hieronym. Some from the foure chief, Cardinall winds Iraen. Advers. Haeres. l. 3. c. 11. Some thinke that the Gospel being to be dispersed to the whole world, the world being divided into foure chiefe parts, therefore there were foure-Evangelists, and hence this History of Christ, written by foure Evangelists, [Page 143] is called Sancta Quadriga Domini i. e. The Lords chariot drawn of foure, wherein Christ rides as in triumph throughout the world, to spread abroad the sweet odour of his knowledge, &c. D. Aurel. Augustin. de consensu. Evangelistarum, lib. 1. c. 5, 6, 7. Tom. 4. August. Expos. in Evang. Ioan. Tract. 36. Iraen. quo supra Most accommodate that of the four Haec autem animalia tria, sive leo, sive homo, sive vitulus in terra gradiuntur: unde isti tres Evangelistae in his maximè occupati sunt, quae Christus in carne operatus, & quae precepta mortalis vitae exercendae carnem▪ portantibus tradidit. At vero Joannes super nubila infirmitat [...]s Humanae velut Aquila volat, & lucem incommutabilis veritatis acutissimis atque firmissimis o [...]ulis cordit in [...]u [...] tur. Aug. de consens. Evang [...] de 1. c. 6. Tom. 4. living creatures, Ezek▪ 1.5. and Rev. 4.6. to the number of the Evangelists, but severally. Ambrose gives, the Man to Matthew, who begins with Christs pedigree; The Lyon to Mark, who begins his History of the Lyon-like ministry of Iohn Baptist, that Evangelicall Elias, Christs immediate forerunner; The Calfe to Luke, who begins▪ his Gospel with the Nativity of Christ, and that in a stable, there being no room for him in the Inne; and the Eagle to Iohn, who in the beginning of his Gospel soares aloft to that high mystery of Christs Divinity and Godhead, D. Ambros. Praefat. in Evang. secund. Luc. But leave we these notions of wit, which seem rather to be similitudes, allusions, or Allegories, used for illustration, rather then [Page 144] Arguments for demonstration, why these foure should write our blessed Saviours History.
We may rather conceive Christs History was written by these foure.
Matthew.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MATTHEW. The English word [Gospel] comes from the old Saxon word, [Godspel] i. e. Good speech ▪ The Greek word signifies Good-tydings, or a Good-Message: This word Gospel in New Testament, is of severall acceptations. It is used.
This Book is called The Gospel according to Mat. because he was Penman of it. Matthew, an Hebr. name, in Syriack [...] Mattha, some derive it from [...] Mas. i. e. Tribute, others from [...] Mathach, i. e. to extend, to explaine, &c. [Page 149] So that Matthew should sound as much as, An explainer, viz. of Scripture. But rather it is to be deriv'd from [...] Nathan i. e. he hath given or bestowed, whence [...] Matthan, A gift; so Matthew no [...]es a Gift, viz. of God, vid. Greg. Gregori Lexicon sanctum, Sect. 858. p. 641. Matthew was also surnamed Levi, in Hebr. i. e. associated, Mark. 2.14. Luk. 5.29. so he had two names. He was the sonne of Alpheus Mark. 2.14. By profession a publicane, sitting at the Receipt of Custome, Luk. 5.27. Mark. 2.14. with Matth. 9.9. his calling was very infamous among the Jews, yet Christ cals him from the Receipt of custome, to be a disciple, who presently obeyed, and made Christ a great feast, Luk. 5.27, 28.29. Mark 2.14, 15. Matth. 9.9, 10. He was one of the twelve Apostles. Matth. 10.3. Penman of this book, Authority whereof was never questioned by the Church of Christ. He is called, A most faithfull Commentator of the Gospel, by Tertul. lib. de carne Christi, c. 22. p. 310. edit Franeher, 1597. He preached the Gospel to sinners, not only by word, but by exemplary correcting [Page 150] his own life▪ Chrysost. in Praesat. oper. imperfect.
Matthew wrote his Gospel as some think in the one and twentieth yeare after Christs ascension, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. Or the fifteenth yeare, As Nicephorus l. 2. c. 45. Or the ninth yeare after Christs ascension, as Pareus Proem. in Matth. p. 599. and Alsted in Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. p. 710
Occasion of Matthews Gospel, some declare thus. Matthew after he had first preached to the Hebrews, and thence was to go to the Gentiles, he committed his Gospel to writing; that so he might supply and compensate his absence by his writing, left behind with them, Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3, c. 24. and out of him Nicephorus l. 2. c. 45
The language, in which Matthew wrote, some thinke was Hebrew; tha [...] he being an Hebrew, wrote in Hebrew to the Hebrews, divers Ancient writers embrace this opinion, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. Athan [...]s. in Synops. p. 141. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 24. Nazianz. in Carm. Hieron. Praefat. in 4. Evang. ad Damas. & in c. 11. Hoseae. August de consens▪ [Page 151] Evang. l. 1. c. 2. Nicephor. l. 4. c. 32. And that it was translated into Greek, By Iohn the Evangelist, as some; By Iames, as o [...]hers; By Luke and Paul, as others; By Mark, as o [...]hers are of opinion. Some thinke he wrote not in pure Hebrew, but in Syriack, being the Dialect then most commonly used, Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. But others Judge, Matthew wrote not his Gospel originally in Hebrew, but in Greek, and that upon these grounds▪ 1. The Hebrew Gospel of Munsterus his Edition is such for language, as it is improbable it should be written by Matthew, or any other skilfull in the Hebrew tongue. 2. The same Authors who report Matthew, to have writ in Hebrew, acknowledge the Greek Gospel of Matthew in the Apostles times, to be commended to the Church as Authentick. Iren. l. 3. c. 39. Hieron. in Catal. illustr. Euseb. l. 3. c. 34. and 39. and l. 5. c. 10. &c. 3. The other Apostles originally wrote in the Greek tongue, (as then most common) and that not only promiscuously to all both Jewes and Gentiles, but peculiarly [Page 152] when they wrote to the Iewes. As Author of the Epistle to Hebrews, Peter, Iames. And their Apostolicall function required them to write in the most knowne tongue, as most to edifying. 4. Matthew's stile plainly agrees with Mark's, differs not much from Iohn's, and though therein there be some Hebraismes, so there are in most books of the New Testament ▪ 5. Matthew interprets Hebrew names by Greek, therefore he wrote in Greek not in Hebrew, e. g. Immanuel Matth. 1.23. Golgotha, Matth. 27.33. Eli Eli lamasabachtani, Matth. 27.46. 6. None can certainly tell who should be the Author of the Greek version, if Matthew wrote in Hebrew. And this opinion tends to destroy the credit and authority of Matthew's Gospel in Greek.
Stope, To evidence to all, but especially to the beleeving Hebrews, with whom he had preached, that this Iesus Christ, was the true Messiah; the true promised seed of David and Abraham, Matth. 1.1.
Principall parts. This History describes.
Mark.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MARK. So denominated from Mark the Penman of it.
MARK, some derive from the Hebr. [...] Marak. i. e. He hath polished, &c. As Hebrewes. Others rather take it to be a Latine name (made a Denizon in the Greek tongue) and derived from the moneth of March, because Mark was borne in that moneth, it being usuall so to denominate men that were born in March, Probus. He was also called Iohn Act. 12.12. & 15.37. viz. Iohn Mark. His Father seemes not to be mentioned in Scripture. His mother was that Mary in whose house they were praying for Peter, when Peter brought out of prison by the Angel, came and knockt at the doore, Act. 12.12. He was cousin to Barnabas, his Sisters Son, Col. 4.10. Though he was not an Apostle, yet he was an Apostolicall man. Some think he was one of the 70 Disciples. Hieronym ▪ [Page 156] If so, he both heard and saw Christ. However he was the follower of Paul and Barnabas, Act. 12.25. And they had him to their Minister, Act. 13.5. Afterwards when there arose a sharp controversie betwixt Paul and Barnabas about Mark; Paul and Barnabas departed a sunder, and Barnabas took Mark along with him to Cyprus, Act. 15.37, 38, 39. And after this (as some thinke) Mark lived with Peter, who cals him Marcus my sonne, 1 Pet. 5.13. From whose mouth he wrote the Gospel, as some think, yet others are of opinion, there were two Marks, Vid▪ Iacob. Laurent. in 1 Pet. 5.13. Irenaeus stiles him The Disciple and interpreter of Peter. Iraen. advers. Heraes. l. 3. c. 1. p. 229. edit. Colon. 1596.
Mark wrote his Gospel two yeares after Matthew, as some think, vid. Annotat. in Irenaeum quo supr. p. 229.230. And he wrote it upon occasion of the request of some Brethren at Rome, as some conceive. Epiphan Haeres. 51. Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 6. c. 11. & l. 1. c. 15. Niceph. lib. 2. c. 15. Hieron. Catal. illust. That conceit of Baronius that he [Page 157] wrote his Gospel in Latin, is rejected as groundlesse. Gerh. loc. com. de Sac. Script. exeg. c. 9. §. 244.
Scope; To describe the true Christ, and to prove that Iesus is the Christ. And this he doth compendiously, as Matthew had done before more Copiously. He also notes the Series and Order of the History.
Principall parts. An Historicall Narration of Christs life, and death is orderly and compendiously laid down;
Luke.
THe Gospel according to LUKE. So denominated from Luke the Penman of it,
[Page 159]LUKE some account an Hebrew name [...] Lokam, i. e. To him the Resurrection; Theophilact thinkes, that Luke and Cleophas first met Christ after his Resurrection. But this is lesse probable, because Luke testifies, that he wrote this History of Christ, according as things were delivered to him by Ministers of the word, that were eye-witnesses—Luke 1.1.2. Others rather count Luke a Latin name from Lucius. Lucius derived a Luce Oriente, i. e. from the morning light, they were wont to impose this name upon such as were borne in the morning, about Sun-rising, &c. He was of Antioch in Syria, as Hieronym. and Theophylact. By particular vocation, a Physician, Luke the beloved Physition, Col. 4.14. And some think he was a most excellent Painter. Niceph. l. 6. c. 16. & l. 15. c. 14. He was a faithfull and constant companion of Paul, 2 Tim. 4.11. His fellow labourer, Philem. 24. And some think Luke is intended by that brother whose praise is in the Gospel throughout all the Churches, 2 Cor. 8.18. Bez. in loc. intimates this was Hierom's opinion. Though Chrysostome [Page 160] rather thinks it was Barnabas, to whom Calvin subscribes, Calv. in loc. Piscat in loc. Luke was an inseparable Companion of Paul and his fellow-worker in the Gospel; saith Irenalis l. 3. c. 14. Pauls follower; and though not an Apostle, yet Apostolicall; saith Tertull. advers. Marcion. l. 4. c. 2. That Luke was most skilfull in the Greek tongue, not onely Hieronym. in Isaiah c. 6. testifies; but also his very stile cleerly evidenceth. Whereupon one saith, It is known to the learned, that Luke observed a more pure Hellenisme then the rest of the Evangelists, Causab. Exerc. 2. c. 1. Paul converted Luke at The [...]es, think Hieronym. Eusebius ▪ and Niceporus. Luke lived a single life, and taught first in France, Italy, Macedonia, and Dalmatia; thinks Epiphan. His death is variously reported; he lived 84 yeares saith Hieron. in Catal. and then dyed in Bithynia. Hicrony. in Catal. At Ephesus, thinks Dorotheus. He was hanged on a fruitfull Olive-tree; thinks Nicephorus.
He wrote his Gospel about fifteene yeeres after Christs Ascension Niceph. and that in the parts of Achaiah, Hieronym.
[Page 161] Occasion of his writing, some say was the appointment of Peter or Paul, that's doubtfull. Probably the request of Theophilus (supposed to be some eminent Senator) to whom he directs both his Gospel, and the Acts. Though some take this name Theophilus, for any go [...]ly man, Lover of God. Luke himselfe cleerely sets down one occasion, viz. The unsuccessefull attempts of many who wrote false Gospels, Luke 1.1.2.
Scope, Besides the generall ayme of all the Evangelists, Luke seemes particularly to intend to supply what others had omitted, and to record thing [...] from the very first, and that methodically in order; that Theophilus might know the certainty of things wherein he had been instructed, Luke 1.3, 4.
Principall parts. In Lukes Evangelical History, are,
John.
THe Gospel according to JOHN. This book is thus intituled from the Penman of it, viz. Not Iohn the Baptist (as he is surnamed Luke 1.63.) Nor Iohn surnamed Marke, Act. 15.37. but Iohn the Apostle, compare Matth. 10.2. with John 21.20, 24. This is the Disciple which testifyeth of these things, and wrote these things. He wrote also three Epistles; and the Revelation in Patmos. JOHN is Originally an Hebrew name, viz. [...] Iochanan. 1 Chron 12.22. Ierem. 40.13. it is also sometimes written [...] I [...]hochanan, as in 1 Chron. 26.3. It is compounded of [...] Iehovah, the proper and essentiall name of God, and [...] [Page 164] chanan i. e. He hath been gracious; whence comes [...] chen i. e. Grace; so that IOHN imports, THE LORD HATH BEEN GRACIOUS; or, THE GRACE OF THE LORD. This Iohn was the sonne of Zebedee, and brother of Iames, all of them Fishermen by trade: Matth. 4.21. and 10.2. Mark 1.19. Luke 5.10. Salome (mentioned Mark 15 40. and 16.1.) is supposed to be Iohn's mother. As Iohn was with his Father, and Brother in the Ship, mending their nets, Jesus called him and his Brother, Matth. 4.21. Luke 5.10. It is thought that Iohn lived a single life: yet some are of opinion that Iohn was the Bridegroome at Cana in Galilie. Ioh. 2.1.9. It is certain; that Iohn was one1 of the three whom Christ took up with him to mount Tabor to behold his trans-figuration, Matth. 17.1. &c. Mark 9.2. Luke 9.28. &c. And z one of the two, whom Christ sent to prepare his last Passeover, Luke 22.8. And 3 that Disciple whom Iesus peculiarly loved above all the rest, Ioh. 13.23. and 19.26. and 20.2, & 21.7.20. 4 Who leaned on Iesus breast at supper; and 5 to [Page 165] whom Christ by a private token discovered that Iudas should betray him, Ioh. 13.23, 24, 25, 26. And 6 to whom Christ dying on the Crosse, commenced his own mother, Ioh. 19.25, 26, 27. After Christs Ascension, Iohn, with Peter, healed miraculously the lame man as they were going into the Temple, Act. 3.3, 4, &c. Preached boldly against all prohibitions, Act. 4.13, 19. Was sent to Samaria having received the word, from the Apostles at Ierusalem, Acts 8.14. Tertullian saith, that the Apostle Iohn, after he in Rome had been cast into burning Oyle, and suffered nothing thereby, was banished into an Iland Tertul. lib. de Praescriptione adversus Haereticos cap. XXXVI. p. 211 edit. Franeker. 1597. Nero slung him into the burning Oyle, as is thought: Domitian Banished him into the Isle Patmos Rev. 1.9, 10. Whence its supposed, he returned under Nerva; came to Ephesus in the 97 yeere of his age, where he lived and taught till he was 99. He made his Sepulcher with his own hands. Left his Disciples, Papias at Ierusalem; Policarpus at Smyrna; and Ignatius at Antioch. [Page 166] He is supposed to write his Gospel towards the end of his life. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. Iohn's Gospel hath still been had of most high account with Antiquity. See Basil. in Homil. sub Princ. Ioan. Chrysost in Prolog. Comment. super Ioan▪ Ambros. l. 3. de sacram. c. 2. Cyrill in Prolog. Ioan. Hieronym. Proem. Comment. in Matth. August. de Civit. dei. l. 10. c. 29. and Tract. 56. in Ioan.
Occasion of Iohn's writing his Gospel, Ecclesiasticall Writers tels us was twofold. viz. 1. To oppose and confute the blasphemous heresies of Ebion and Cerinthus, who denyed the Divinity of Christ; hence Iohn so clearly asserts it, Iohn. 1. See Iren. Advers. haeres. l. 3. c. 11. p. 257. edit. Colon. 1596. Hieronym, in Proem. Comment. in Matth. 2. To supply what the other three Evangelists had omitted, who principally relate things done by Christ, but for one yeare wherein Christ suffered, after Iohn was cast into prison, Euseb. Hist l. 6. c. 13. ex Clem. Alexandr.
Scope of Iohn's writing is expressely noted, Iohn 20.31. These are written [Page 167] that yee might believe that Iesus is the Christ, the sonne of God, and that believing yee might have life through his name.
The Principall parts, or Generall Branches of this Hist. are,
The Acts:
THE HISTORY OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST, his body, and that in the purest Primitive Apostolicall times, is contained in the Acts OF THE HOLY APOSTLES. So denominated from the principall subject matter of this Book, viz. The Acts of the Apostles in the infancy of the Primitive Church, therein recorded Historically.
Penman of this History was Luke the beloved Physitian, who also wrote the Gospel (of whom see what is there spoken) as appears 1. By the Preface or Introduction here prefixed, wherein he mentions the former Treatise of the Gospel penned by him; names Theophilus to whom he directed particularly [Page 170] this History of the Apostles, as well as that History of Christ; and also he connects or knits this Book to his Gospel, by continuing the History where he formerly left. viz. At the Resurrection and Ascension of Iesus Christ, which here is somewhat more fully described, and what followed thereupon, Act. 1.1, 2. So that his Gospel, and the Acts of the Apostles are but as one continued History. 2. By the very stile, which seems notably to indigitate Luke unto us, partly it being compleat and polished Greek becomming Luke an accurate Grecian, who had also most diligently perused the Septuagint version; partly it being replenished with Hebraismes, suitable to Luke's native Genius, being by country a Syrian of Antioch, (the Syrian language being one of the Hebrew dialects) partly because herein somtimes is the Language of a Physitian, very agreeable to Lukes profession, as Act. 17.16. His spirit was stirred in him. [...] i. e. His spirit was in a Paroxysme; the word is used by Physitians to signifie a sharp fit of an ague, fever, &c. & again, the Contention was so sharp, [...] [Page 171] i. e. there befell a Paroxysme, —this word is not used in all the New Testament by any, but Luke, and Paul, (whose companion Luke was) 1 Cor. 13.5. Heb. 10.24. 3. By the consent of ancient and moderne writers. No doubt this Book was written by Luke of Antioch, the Physitian, Hieron in Praefa [...]. Act. Luke the follower of the Apopostle and companion of all his Travell, wrote the Gospel, — and put forth also another excellent volume entituled the Acts of the Apostles. Hieronym. de vir illustr. And againe, the Acts, of the Apostles seem to import a bare history of the infancy of the new-born Christ, but if we know Luke the Physi [...]ian to be the penman of them, whose praise is in the Gospel, we shall consider also that all his words are a medicine for a languishing soule. Hieron. praefat. in Act. and out of him Beda, [...] i. e. The book of the Acts which Luke wrote. Oecumen. in Scholiis. None but the unlearned and unskilfull, can doubt whether Luke were Penman of the Acts, &c. Erasmus.
Occasion. It is thought that Luke [Page 172] wrote this History at Rome, during Pauls imprisonment there. Hieron. de vir illustr. And that at the request of the faithfull brethren at Rome: and by the command of Paul, Dorotheus and Nicephor. Hist. l. 2. c. 43. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 123. The time of writing is referred to the sixtieth year of Christ, the fourth of Nero, 27th. after Pauls conversion. But the peculiar guidance of the Holy Ghost, was the principall cause of Lukes writing both this and the former Book.
Scope. To describe unto us the Rise, Growth, State and practice of the Primitive Christian Church in her infancy, in the purest Apostolicall times, how she observed and obeyed Christs Commandements to his Apostles, after his Resurrection and before his Ascension, speaking to them of the things pertaining to the Kingdome of God, Acts 1.2, 3. and this both in matters of faith, worship, Church-Communion, and Church-Government; that herein the Primitive Church might be an exemplary Patterne to the following Churches in all succeeding ages. So that this is a most usefull Book to the Church of God.
[Page 173] Principall branches. The Acts of the Apostles, are laid down in this History,
II. EPISTOLICAL BOOKS.
THE EPISTOLICAL BOOKS of the New Testament, are, All the Epistles, written by the Apostles; the Apostles being oft-times unable to instruct by their personall presence, supplyed that by writing Epistles. These Epistles are either written, 1. To the Beleeving Gentiles, Or 2. To the Beleeving [Page 176] Iews; as was formerly noted,
1 To the beleeving Gentiles, The Apostle Paul wrote his Epistles, which are either 1. Generall written to whole Churches: Or 2. Particular to some select particular persons. Some do rank Pauls Epistles thus, according to the persons to whom they were written, viz.
Pauls Epistles were written either
Others endeavour, and that not unprofitably to marshall Pauls Epistles, in the Order of times and seasons, wherein they were severally written, which Order is not observed as they are placed in our Bibles. And though the [Page 177] punctuall time when every Epistle was written, cannot evidently and infallibly be demonstrated either by the Epistles themselves, or other Ecclesiasticall Histories, yet we may have good probabilities hereof, as may appeare in this Type or Table ensuing, viz.
Pauls Epistles were written, 1. Before his Bonds and Captivity at Rome. 2. In his Bonds and Imprisonment there.
This noting the severall times of the Apostles writing his Epistles is usefull, To let us see why the Apostle wrote so variously about the same things, as Circumcision and other Ceremonies, As; To the Romanes, that they should receive the weake, &c. about Ceremonies and indifferent things, Rom. 14. 1. &c. But to the Galatians, and Colossians, utterly condemns use of Circumcision, &c. Gal. 5.2. &c. Col. 2, the reason is the difference of times, Chrisostome. Ceremonies were alwayes Mortales, mortall; at Christs death became Mortuae, dead; onely Moses must be honourably buried, for the weak Iewes the use of them was permitted a while; but after that they became Mortiferae, deadly to them that used them.
[Page 186]But here Pauls Epistles shall be considered according to the method and distribution of all the Books of the New Testament first proposed: and that the rather, because so we shall view them as they stand in order in our Bibles.
And first of Pauls Generall Epistles to whole Churches, which are nine, viz.
Romanes.
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the ROMANES. So denominated, 1. Partly from the object to whom the Epistle is written, viz. The believing Romanes, Rom. 1.7. When this Epistle was written, there was so famous a Church at Rome, that their Faith was spoken of throughout the whole World, Rom. 1.8. Yea there were even in Caesars houshould that had received the faith. Phil. 4.22. But by whom or when was the Church of the Romanes first planted? Answ. Scripture is silent, Papists say by Peter, Bel [...]m. de [Page 187] Pont. Rom. l. 2. c. 2. But Peter never was at Rome, much lesse planted the Church there D. Pareus in Rom. 16. Pub. II. Barnabas is supposed to have preached Christ at Rome, and to have converted the Romanes, under the Reign of Tyberius, if Clement may be believed. Recognition. Clementis lib. 1. But now Rome is as infamous as once it was famous, being the seat of Antichrist, Rev. 17, 9, &c. the Spirituall Egypt Rev. 11.8. Sodome Rev. 11.8. And Babylon devoted to destruction, Rev. 18.2, &c. 2. Partly from the Penman of the Epistle, viz. Paul, Rom. 1.1.
PAUL is a Latin name from Paulus, i. e. a little one, so the Romanes were wont to call them that were of a lesser stature, he seemes most to be delighted with this Romane name, being appointed Apostle to the Gentiles. Some think he first had this name given him, upon occasion of his conversion of Sergius Paulus the Deputy, Act. 13.7.9.12▪ Hieronym. de claris Script, Before he was called Saul, i. e. desired, asked, &c. From the Hebrew [...] Shaal, i. e. he hath asked, desired, &c. It is not likely that he [Page 188] changed his name Saul into Paul: but rather that he had two names, as all the Iews had that were freemē of Rome; Saul then denoted his nation and Religion, Paul signified his Roman freedome. And Scripture favours this that he had two names, saying, Saul, which also is Paul, Act. 13.9. The History of Paul is notably described in the New Testament, especially in Phil. 3. 1 Tim▪ 1. And in Act. 13. to the end of the Book, but more summarily, Act. 22.3, to 22. and 26.4. to 24. He was a Iew by Nation; of the Tribe of Benjamin; of the Province of Cilicia; borne in the City Tarsus, (which being a Colony and having the priviledge of the Romane freedome, Paul though of Iewish Parents, yet saith he was a Roman free-born, Act. 22.7.28.) circumcised the eighth day; brought up at the feet of Gamaliel; a great proficient above many in the Iewish Religion; in his Zeale persecuting all that seemed to oppose it; held the garments of those that stoned Stephen, consenting to his death; made havock of the Church, &c. But at last, as he was in his Circuit of persecution, he [Page 189] was miraculously converted of a Wolfe to become a Lamb, and of a Persecuter to be a prime Apostle, in his Apostleship he suffered and laboured more then all the rest of the Apostles; was peculiarly sent to teach the Gentiles. At last he was carryed bound to Rome, and there he was be headed by Nero in seventeenth yeere after Christ's Ascension, in the fourteenth yeer of Nero, and thirty fifth yeere after his conversion, and buried in the Ostiense way. Hieronym. He wrote fourteen Epistles, of which one said, As oft as I read Paul, me thinks I heare not words so much as thunders, Paulum quotiesc [...]n (que) lego, videor mihi non verba au [...]dire, sed tonitrua. Hieronym. contr. Iovinian. de Epist. Paulin.
His Epistle to the Romanes, though no [...] first written, yet is set first. 1. By reason of the dignity of the Romanes to whom it was written, Rome being the Seate of the Empire, and Head of the World. 2. Because of the largenesse of the Epistle, this being the longest of all the Epistles. As Isaiah is set first being the longest of all the Prophets. 3. But especially from the dignity of [Page 190] the matter, and dexterity in handling it. The Body of Divinity is so admirably herein handled, espicially the principall points of Election, Reprobation, Redemption, Faith and Iustification by Faith, &c. that it is deservedly called by some Clavis Theologiae, the Key of Divinity; and Methodus Scripturae, the Method of Scripture.
When it was written, See in former Table. Where it was written, is to be considered. Origen in Praefat. Comment. thinks at Corinth. 1. Because he commends Phaebe to the Romans, Rom. 16.1. She was a servant to the Church at Cenchrea, which is a Port of Corinth. 2. Because he salutes them in the name of Gaius his Host, &c. Rom. 16.23. And Gaius a Corinthian, and there Baptized by Paul 1 Cor. 1.14. 3. Because he salutes them in the name of Erastus Chamberlaine of the City, Rom. 16.23. Who abode at Corinth, 2 Tim. 4.20. 4. The postscript testifies thus much.
Occasion and Scope of this Epistle seemes to be this. The report that Paul had received of some disagreements both in judgement and affection, in them [Page 191] of the Church of Rome, who were partly believing Jewes, partly believing Gentiles. The Iewes either wholly opposing the Gospel, or mingling Law and Gospel together in the case of Justification▪ and all of them excluding the Gentiles from the fellowship of Christ, and despising them, insisting too much upon the Prerogative of the Jew: Contrariwise the Gentiles, knowing that the Jewes were rejected of God, and the Gentiles implanted in their stead, too much insulted over them as a people cast away, boasting of their own wisdome and vertues, and using their Christian liberty with offence. Now to reconcile these Controversies, and to settle them both in the truth, and in unity of judgement and affection, the Apostle being hindred from coming to them deals by letters; Demonstrating that neither Iewes had cause to boast of their righteousnesse and Prerogatives, nor Gentiles of their wisdome: both of them naturally being liable to eternal condemnation notwithstanding, and both of them being to be justified by Faith in Christ alone, and that they should not abuse Grace, but walke in newnesse of life, &c.
[Page 192] Generall parts. In this Epistle to the Romanes are chiefly three parts.
I Corinth:
THe first Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the CORINTHIANS.
So denominated from the Penman thereof, Paul (of whom in Epistle to the Romanes) and from the object to whom he wrote it, viz. The Corinthians; or the Church of God at Corinth, 1 Cor. 1.1, 2. CORINTH was an eminent City of Achaia (which Achaia by an Isthmus was annexed to Greece, neer to Athens) seated in an Isthmus, or a little tract of Land betwixt two Seas, the Aegean and Ionian Sea, A most famous Mart, very populous, and flowing with wealth, it was Lumen & decus totius Graeciae. Cic. pro leg. Manil. i. e. The Light and glory of all Greece: yet very infamous for luxury and multitudes of vices. Once utterly destroyed by L. Mummius the Roman Consul; but after for the opportunity of situation restored to its ancient splendour by Augustus. [Page 195] D. Pareus in prolegom. in I ad Corinth. Paul coming from Athens to Corinth, laid the first foundation of a Church there, 1 Cor. 3.10. He was the [...]r Spirituall Father that begot them, 1 Cor. 4.15. Converting, by his preaching, Crispus and Sosthenes chiefe Rulers of the Jewish Synagogue there; and many other Corinthians; among whom Paul continued preaching, a yeare and six Moneths; God assuring him by night in a Vision, that he had much people in that City. Act. 18.1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17. And this Church of Corinth grew one of the most eminen [...] Churches for all manner of spirituall gifts, 1 Cor. 1.5, 6, 7.
When and where this Epistle was written, See in the Table before Epistle to Romanes. As the Epistle to Romanes is set first for Doctrine of Faith: So this is set second for Doctrine of Church-government, excellently handled therein.
Occasion of writing this Epistle, seemes to be twofold. 1. The information that Paul had from them of the House of Cloe, of the many and wofull [Page 196] distempers that infested the Church of Corinth after Paul's departure, as 1 Schismes and Divisions 1 Cor. 1.11. &c. 2 Many notorious scandals, as Lusts, Incest, Covetousnesse, Law-suits, &c. 1 Cor. 5. & 6. 3 Idolatrous Communion with Infidels in their Idoll-feasts, 1 Cor. 8. & 10. 4 Vncomely habits in publique Assemblies, 1 Cor. 11.3, to 17. 5 Prophanations of the Lords Supper, 1 Cor. 11.17. to the end. 6 Barbarous confusion in their publique Church-Assemblies, 1 Cor. 14. And 7 finally such Epicure-like profanesse, as to deny the Resurrection and eternall life, 1 Cor. 15.12, &c. 2. The writing of some of the Corinthians unto the Apostle for satisfaction in some particular cases, as 1 about Marriage. 2 About Things sacrificed to Idols. 3 About Spirituall gifts. 4 About Prophesying. And 5 about charitable Collections for the Saints in Iudea. 1 Cor. 7.1.
Scope. The Apostle therefore in this Epistle principally endeavours, To apply healing medicines speedily to all the evils and maladies that began to grow in that Church; and to give them satisfactory Resolutions in all the particulars, [Page 197] wherein they craved his advise from the Lord.
Generall parts. In this I. Epistle to Corinthians, consider
II Corinth.
THe II. Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the CORINTHIANS, So called from Paul the Penman of it. (of whom see before in Epistle to the Romans) and from the parties to whom he wrote, viz. The Church at Corinth, (of which see in I. to Corinth.) and to all the Saints in all Achaia, 2 Cor. 1.1. probably there being many Saints in that Province, who could not so safely and conveniently meet in Church-Assemblyes, but were dispersed up and down by reason of the turbulency of those times. Calvin in loc.
When this Epistle was written, see before in the Table.
[Page 201] Occasion of this Epistle seems to be, those Calumnies and aspersions cast upon Pa [...]ls words and actions by false Apostles and other his adversaries after his former Epistle; they charged him with l [...]vity, that he came not to them according to his premise: with pride and tyrannicall severity, because of the incestuous person: with less [...]ning the authority of the law: and that however he was glorious in his letters, yet in person he was but base, &c. Paul therefore wipes off these aspersions, & shows that he wrote not his former Epistle to them for any such ends, but for promoting of their salvation. So that this Epistle is for most part of it Apologeticall, viz. Pauls Apology against his adversaries calumnies, and this the end and Scope of it; as also to testify his love to them, and to prevent his having sorrow from them, when he should come unto them. 2 Cor. 2.3, 4.
Principall parts. are
Galatians.
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the GALATIANS. So intituled from the Penman Paul, who wrote it: and from the Churches in Galatia to whom he wrote it. Gal. 1.1, 2. Galatia, so called from Galli, i. e. The French, that came and inhabited there, who called the countrey after their name. That they were French, all agree; but from what part of France they came, is lesse evident; see Calvin's judgement herein, Calv. in Argum. Epist. ad Galat. Galatia was an ample Province of Asia Minor, neer to Phrygia, into which anciently entred a people from Gallia of Europe, and seated themselves betwixt Bithynia and Cappadocia, as is testified by Strabo. l. 12. Iustin. l. 25. ab initio. [Page 205] Livi. l. 8. decad. 4. Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 32. The more principall cities in the Province of Galatia, (as Appianus in Chronolog. fol. 44. notes) were these Synopa, Pompriopolis, Claudiopolis, Ancyra, (the Metropolis, famous for an ancient Councel there,) Laodicea, Antioch and Nicopolis, D. Pareus in Com. in Gal. 1.2. Paul with Silas and Timothy, travelled through the region of Galatia once, but were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, Act. 15.40. and 16.1, 2.3.6 But afterwards he went over all the Countrey of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples, Act. 18.23. In which countrey of Galatia, in most of the famous cities, Paul had planted famous Churches of Christ, as is conceived, Gal. 1.8. &c.
Occasion. It seemes by the current of the Epistle, that after Pauls departure from Galatia, having planted the Gospel there: there came among them false Apostles and corrupt teachers, who endeavoured to disgrace Paul's Apostleship among them, and to pervert the purity and simplicity of the Gospel among [Page 206] them, and to pervert the purity and simplicitie of the Gospel of Christ, by mixtures of legall doctrines: urging the observance of both morall and ceremoniall law, and particularly of circumcision, as necessary to Justification; so mingling and blending together Law and Gospell, works and faith, Iudaisme and Christianisme: tending dangerously to the subversion of that Church.
Scope. Hence the Apostle yearning over these Churches, writes this Epistle to them, to recover them out of this errour in that fundamentall point of Iustification: to convince them of Iustification by faith only; to demonstrate unto them the nature and use of morall and ceremoniall law: and incite them to a holy Christian Conversation.
Principall parts of this Epistle, to this end, are,
Ephesians.
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the EPHESIANS. So denominated from the Saints at Ephesus to whom Paul wrote, Eph. 1.1. EPHESUS was a city on the shore of the Ionian sea, looking towards the west of Asia Minor, of old a city of great traffique, but much addicted to magick Arts, and to superstition, there being the Temple of the great goddesse Diana, Act. 19, Paul came to Ephesus at first, and reasoned with the Jewes in their Synagogues, but tarried not there at that time, because he hasted to keep the feast at Ierusalem, Acts 18, 19, 20, 21. After that he came a second time to Ephesus, and continued there preaching and disputing for two years and three moneths, and so planted a famous Church there, Act. 19.1, 8, 10. &c. 1 Cor. 16.9, till by the uproare at Ephesus he was necessitated to depart, Act. [Page 210] 20.1. yet after his departure into Macedonia, Act. 19.1, 2. he committed the care and inspection of the Church at Ephesus unto Timothy, 1 Tim. 1.3, 4. &c. And Paul being afterwards at Miletus, called thither the Elders of Ephesus, exhorting and encouraging them in their charge, knowing they should see his face no more, Acts 20.17. to the end. After Timothy, it is supposed Iohn the Evangelist was Bishop of this Church.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in Table before Epistle to Romans.
Occasion of Pauls writing to the Ephesians, was not Schismes and Scandals, as in the Church of Corinth; nor false doctrine supplanting justification by faith, that fundamentall point, as in the Church of Galatia; But the Apostles singular tendernesse and provident care of this Church, (he being not now farre from his death,) lest they should faint or be discouraged by his bonds at Rome, and be weary of the Gospel through the Crosse.
Scope, To encourage the Ephesians to [Page 211] constancy in faith and piety, and growth therein, notwithstanding all his or their tribulations for the Gospel.
Principall Parts, To this end, are▪
Philippi:
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the PHILIPPIANS. So intituled because written by Paul to the Saints, Bishops and Deacons at Philippi, Phil. 1.1. PHILIPPI was the name of two cities, viz. one in Thessalie, at first called Dathos, but after Philippi from Philip of Macedo who repaired it. Alsted. Praecog. Theol. l. 2. c. 124. Another a city of Macedonia, situate in the confines of Thracia, in the fields whereof Pompey was overcome by Caesar; and after [Page 213] Brutus and Cassius, by Anthony and O [...]avi [...]s. This latter Philippi, is here meant to this Philippi, Paul came, being warned by vision to go into Macedonia, Act. 16.9. to the end of the chapt. Here Lydia and the Iailor were converted, and Paul here laid the foundation of a slourishing Church, Calv. Argum. in Ep. ad Philip.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, see in former Table, &c.
Occasion, the Church at Philippi sent their bounty to Paul now Prisoner at Rome, to support him and supply his wants there, by Epaphroditus their Pastor, who doubtlesse coming to Paul, disclosed to him the spirituall stare of that Church, whereupon Paul writes this Epistle from Rome, by Epaphrodit us Phil. 2.25.
Scope. To confirme the Philippians in faith and Godlinesse, to warne them against Seducers, and to testify his thankfulnesse for their bountifull remembrance of him, in his distresses.
Principall Parts, to this [...]nd are
Colossians
THe Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the COLOSSIANS. So intituled from the Colossians to whom Paul wrote this Epistle, to the Saints and faithfull Brethren in Christ, which are at Colosse, Col. 1.2. These Colossians were not that people dwelling in Rodes (called Colossians from that huge Colossus or Image of the Sunne 70 Cubites high, there erected: But rather those inhabitants of Colosse a chiefe City in Phrygia in Asia Minor, neere unto Hierapolis and Laodicea; as Hierome and Chrysostome thinke. And this Epistle it selfe seemes to intimate thus much, wherein he mentions Epaphr [...]s his zeale for them at Colosse, Laodicea, and Hierapolis, Col. 4.13. Bids them salu [...]e the brethren in Laodicea, ver. 15. and that this Epistle be read in the Church of the Laodiceans, ver. 16. Now Laodicea and Hierapolis are neere Colosse, but [Page 216] farre distant from Rhodes, as learned writers import. Xenophon in 1. de expedit. Cyri; writes, That after he entred into Phrygia, he went streight [...] i. e. Vnto Colosse a City of universall resort, rich, and great. Euseb. in Chronic. saith, That three Cities of Asia, Laodicea, Hierapolis and Colosse fell with one and the same earthquake. And Plin. in Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 32. Seates not Colosse in any Iland, but among the Cities of the Continent.
When and whence this Epistle was written, see in the former Table.
Occasion. Epaphras fellow-labourer with the Apostles, had in Colosse with other Ministers planted a Church. The Faith preached to the Colossians was impugned, Partly by some converted out of Iudaisme who urged the Ceremonies of the Law as necessary to Salvation, confounding Christ and Moses together: Partly by some converted out of Gentilisme, who obtruded Philosophicall subtilties upon them, counting the simplicity of the Gospel too much below wise men, and so blended Theology [Page 217] with Philosophy, The Apostle therefore being prisoner at Rome, writes to them to instruct and stablish them in the true Doctrine of the Gospel taught them by Epaphras against all the impostures of false Teachers.
Scope. To shew, That all hope of mans Salvation is grounded in Christ alone, and that therefore we should fully rest our selves in the Faith of Christ, and live according to Gospel Rules, rejecting all Mosaicall Ceremonies, and Philosophicall speculations.
Principall parts. In this Epistle are,
I Thessal:
THe first Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the THESSALONIANS. So denominated, because written by Paul to the Church of the Thessalonians. 1 Thes. 1 1. And they from their City Thess. which was the Metropolis or mother City in Macedonia, Scituate on the edge of the Macedonian shore: Anciently it was called Thermae, and thence the Thermaick Haven. Suidas. Some give this reason of the [Page 219] change of the name; Philip King of Macedonia in a memorable Battle in these parts overcame the People of Thessaly. For monument of which Victory, the neighbouring City was reedified and enlarged, and named Thessalonica; as it were, [...] i. e. put the victory to another. It was sold by Andronicus to the Venetians, but they did not long enjoy it; for it was; as other parts of Greece, quickly possessed by the Turks. Is now a famous Empory for Indian Marchandice, (but under the Dominion and Idolatry of the Turks) known by the name of Saloniki. Maginus in Geograph.
In Thessalonica God pleased to plant a Church by the Ministry of Paul and Silas, converting both Jewes and Greeks. See the History of it, Act. 17.1. &c. There the unbelieving Jewes mov'd with envy, raised tumults against Paul and Silas, and also against the Saint [...] that entertained them, Iason &c. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. So that Paul and Silas were glad to fly away by night to Berea ver. 10.
Occasion (as may appeare from Act. [Page 220] 17. And 1 Thes. 2. & 3, 1.2,) was this. Paul being forced by tumults to depart from Thessalonica, and fearing least the Church there newly collected should be hazzarded through feare of troubles and persecutions; and going to Athens, he sends Timothy back to confirme the Thessalonians in the Faith, and report their stare to him. Where [...]on Timothy informing him of their constancy notwithstanding persecutions, and of all their affaires, from Athenes Paul wrote this Epistle to them for their encouragement. when this Epistle was written, see in Table above.
Scope. To encourage the Thessalonians both to constant perseverance in Faith and Grace received, notwithstanding all tribulations befalling him or them; As also to make progresse and go on therein unto perfection.
Principall parts, To this end are,
II Thessal.
THe second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the THESSALONIANS. So stiled for the Reason above. When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in former Table.
Occasion seems to be some information, or Reports which the Apostle had received; touching their Persecutions for the Gospel; Touching false teachers, who insinuated to them (perhaps [Page 222] taking occasion by some passages of the former Epistle about Christs second coming) that Christs second coming wo [...]ld be speedily, in that age; and touching exorbitant walking of some, in idlenesse; Church-discipline mean while sleeping. The whole current of the Epistle intimates this occasion.
Scope. 1 To comfort the Church of Thessalonians against all Persecutions for Christ. 2 To informe them of their mistake about the second coming of Christ, that it could not be presently. And 3 to exhort them to divers Christian duties.
Principall parts, to these ends.
Thus farre of Pauls nine generall Epistles, written to whole Churches: Next come to be considered Pauls foure particular Epistles, directed to certaine particular persons, viz. Two to Timothy, and one to Titus about affairs Ecclesiasticall; and one to Philemon about matters Oeconomicall. Those Epistles to Timothy and Titus, Augustine would have him that is a Teacher in the Church to have alwayes before his [Page 225] eyes▪ Augustin. de Doctrin Christian. l. 4▪ c. 16.
I Timothy
THe first Epistle of the Apostle Paul to TIMOTHY. So denominated from Timothy to whom Paul wrote.
TIMOTHY Is a Greek name; Signifies, An Honourer of God. Probably his Godly Parents desired he might be such an one when they gave him this name: and he proved an excellent instrument of Honour to God both in Doctrine and conversation, according to the happy Omen and presage of his name. He is supposed to be of Lycaoni [...], in Asia. His Father was a Greek, his Mother a Jewesse who believed, Act. 16.1. her name Eunice, daughter of Lois his Grandmother; both sincere believers, 2 Tim. 1.5. From a child they trayned him up in the Scriptures, 2 Tim. 3.14, 15. Whence Paul is perswaded that the like Faith [Page 226] dwelt in him, as did in his mother and Grandmother, 2 Tim. 1.5. His Father being a Greek, he was not Circumcised after the custome of the Jewes, but being come to maturity, Paul circumcised him, for the gaining of the Jewes by his Ministry, Act. 16.3. And having good commendation of him by the brethren of Lystra and Iconium, Paul made him his companion in travels throughout the Churches, Act. 16.2, 3, 4. &c. Sometimes Paul sent him as a Messenger to the Churches; whereupon Paul makes such an honourable mention of him and his workes, Act. 19.22. Rom. 16.21. 1 Cor. 4.17. And 16.10. Phil. 2.19, 20, 21, 22. 1 Thes. 3.2, 6. Gives him divers excellent Titles, cals him his brother, 1 Thes. 3.2. Heb. 13.23. His beloved son and faithfull in the Lord, 1 Cor. 4.17. His natural son in the Faith, 1 Tim. 1.2. His dearely beloved sonne, 2 Tim. 1.2. The Minister of God; and his fellow-labourer in the Gospel of Christ, 1 Thes. 3.2. His work-fellow, Rom. 16.21. Yea Paul joynes Timothy with himselfe in the inscriptions of divers Epistles [Page 227] to the Churches, that so he might both commend Timothies worth and authority to the Churches, as also propound him as an exemplary pattern to all faithfull Ministers. See 2 Cor. 1.1. Phil. 1.1. Col. 1.1. 1 Thes. 1.1. 2 Thes. 1.1. Philem. 1. At last after many travels with Paul by Sea and Land, Paul returning into Asia committed the care of the Church of Ephesus to him, whom he knew to be so able and trusty, 1 Tim. 1.3. &c. Which he happily taught, and governed about fifteen yeers; but at last more grievously inveighing against the Idolatrous worships of Diana; under Nero the Christians cruel Enemy, he was slain of the Gentiles with Arrowes and Stones, as is testified by Eusebius Hist. l. 3. c. 14. Some thinke that his bones, together with the reliques of Andrew and Luke were translated to Constantinople by Constantine the Emperour. As Hieronym. and Nicephorus.
When this Epistle was written, see in the Table above.
Occasion and Scope. The Apostle being to depart into Macedonia, left Timothy [Page 228] at Ephesus, that he might prevent unsound Doctrine, and ordaine Elders for that Church. Compare Act. 20. 1 Tim. 1.3. &c. That therefore Timothy might the better know how to behave himselfe in that Church in all Ecclesiasticall affairs, he writes to him this Epistle, not knowing how long he should be absent from him. 1 Tim. 3.14, 15. So that this Epistle may not unfitly be stiled▪ St. Pauls Directory for right mannaging of the Office of the Ministery in the Church of God.
Principall parts, to this end; are
II Timoth:
THe second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to TIMOTHY. So denominated from Timothy to whom Paul wrote. A Description of this Timothy, see in former Epistle.
Occasion. The Apostle having left Timothy at Ephesus to take care of the Church there, 1 Tim. 1.3. when he departed from the Elders of Ephesus, after he had called them to Miletus, and given them charge of the flock, they all wept sore, Acts 20.36, 37. probably, Timothy was one of those that powred out tears, 2 Tim. 1.4. and perhaps the Apostle, that he might comfort Timothy lamenting him, intimated some hopes of his returne unto him, 1 Tim. 3.14. But Paul meane while being carried away captive to Rome, and by his bonds hindred from coming againe to Timothy, thought it necessary by this Epistle to stablish and comfort him, both [Page 231] against the Apostles sufferings and martyrdome approaching as also against all the pressures and persecutions of the Church, & that he should be moved by none of them, to desert or neglect the faithfull, keeping of that excellent treasure of truth, committed of trust to him, 2 Tim. 1.8, 13. and 2.1, 2, 3.4. and 4.1, 2, 5, 6. &c. and that they might more effectually be comforted in one another, he desires him to come shortly to him, 2 Tim. 4.9. that so they might take their last farewell one of another. For this was Pauls last Epistle (as his Swan-like Song) a little before his death, 2 Tim. 4.6, 7.
Scope, To stirre up and strengthen Timothy, to constancy and fidelity, in discharge of his ministeriall office, and the keeping and asserting of the truth, deposited and committed of trust to him; against all the present dangers and persecutions impending him or the Apostle for the same, in these perillous times.
Principall parts. to this end are
Titus.
THe Epistle of Paul to TITUS. So intituled from the name of the person to whom he wrote, Tit. 1.1, 4. Titus is evidently a Greek name, either derived from [...] Titus, i. e, A Dove; (as Ionah in Hebrew hath his name from a Dove,) or rather from [...] Tio i. e. to honour, esteem, &c. thence [...], Titos i. e. Honoured; a fit name for him, that was truely honoured both by God and man. Titus was by Nation a Grecian, a Gentile, & uncircumcised probably till his death, Gal. 2.3. yet effectually converted by Paul to the faith, hence called his naturall sonne after the common faith, Tit. 1.4. yea he cals him his Partner and fellow-helper. 2 Cor. 8.23. and his brother, 2 Cor. 2.13. having enjoyed him as a companion of his travels, Gal. 2.1. a comfort in his sorrows, 2 Cor. 7.6. and having used him as a Legate or messenger unto divers Churches, [Page 234] and betrusted him with the Collections for the poor Saints in Iudea, 2 Tim. 4.10. 2 Cor. 8.6, 16, 17. Paul having planted a Church in the Isle of Creta, now called Candy, he left Titus there behind him to finish the work, appointing him to set in order things that were wanting, and to ordaine Elders in every city, Tit. 1.5. and there it is thought, he died and was buried.
Occasion and Scope, Paul having left Titus in Creet to order things wanting, &c. in the Church now planted there, and perceiving that in his absence false Teachers, erroneous in judgement, and scandalous in life, crept in, seeking to destroy the faith, by mingling Christ and Moses together, to disturbe Church-Government planted, and to disjoyne the practice from the profession of piety. Paul therefore sollicitous for the Church, writes this Epistle to Titus, both to strengthen and gaine Authority to his ministery there against all contempt; as also to direct him, how to order and stablish things wanting in the Church, how to represse distempers and disorders arising, and how to demeane himselfe, both in doctrine and conversation, towards [Page 235] severall sorts of Persons.
Principall parts to this end
Thus of Pauls Epistles written to particular persons about Ecclesiasticall affairs. Now of his Epistles written to particular [Page 236] persons, yea to a Church, Philem. 1.2. about Oeconomicall or Houshold affairs. viz.
Philemon.
THe Epistle of Paul to Philemon. So called because peculiarly and in the first place directed to him, Philem. 1.2. PHILEMON, as some thinke sounds like an Hebrew name, and signifies, The mouth of bread, so denoting his beneficence and bounty relieving them with bread, &c. that were poore and needy, See v. 7. Hieron. Others rather taking this Etymon to be uncertain, count Philemon a Greek name, signifying Kissing, from [...] Philema. i. e. A kisse, So intimating his kindnesse.
This is not that ancient Comick poet, called Philemon, which Paul seems to have read, by some expressions in his Epistles, as 1 Tim. 2.12. and 5.23. Tit. 2.3. The fragments of which poet are extant, collected by Henr. Steph. [Page 237] But this Philemon is supposed to be by Countrey a Phrygian, as Theophylact. and in particular a minister of the Church at Colosse, an eminent towne in Phrygia. Paul here cals him fellow-labourer, Phil [...]m. v. 1. viz. in preaching the Gospel; and a Partner, v. 17▪ compare Philem. v. 1, 2. with Col. 4.17, He is called a Bishop by Anselme, an Evangelist by Hierom. And here is mention of the Church in his house, v. 2. Probably, Philemon was converted or much edified by Pauls ministry, from that intimation, v. 19. was deare to Paul ▪ he cals him brother v. 7, 20. his dearly beloved. v. 1. He is commended for his faith in Christ, and bountifull love to all the Saints, vers. 5.7. Though rich, yet is suspected to be sornewhat too covetous, from that expression, v. 18, 19. We find no mention of him in Scripture, but only in this Epistle.
Occasion. Onesimus servant to Philemon, had much wronged him in purloyning his goods, (it is probably thought he stole some money from him) and so ranne away from him to [Page 238] Rome, where (providence so ordered things,) hearing Paul preach he was converted, and ministred to Paul in prison. But Paul understanding the cause of his depar [...]ing from his Master, sends Onesimus back again to his master with this Epistle, perswading him to forgive him, and entertaine him again.
Scope. To reconcile Onesimus, now converted, to Philemon his master, whom he had much wronged formerly, being unconverted, and had runne away from him.
Principall parts, of this most elegant and patheticall Epistle, to this end, are
Hitherto of the Epistles written to the II believing Gentiles, and all by Paul: Now of the Epistles written to the believing Iews by severall Apostles.
Hebrews.
THe Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the HEBREWS. So intituled in the Greek Copies, from the Penman writing it, and the parties to whom he wrote. The Syriack version hath it, The Epistle to the Hebrews.
HEBREWS. So denominated not from Heber, Selah's son, Sem's grandechild mentioned Gen. 10.24. But rather from Abram the father of the faithfull. and that not from the name Abram, which is written with [...] whereas Hebrews, is written originally with [...] viz. [...] Hhhibri. but from the Epithet given first to Abram, viz. Abram the Hebrew, Gen. 14.13. Abram being called [...] i. e. the Hebrew from [...] To passe over or passe thorough, Gen. 12.6. because from Mesopotamia he passed over Euphrates into Canaan, and so passed thorough the land. compare Gen. 12.1. to 7. with Act. 7.2, 3, 4. So that Abram [Page 241] the Hebrew, sounds as much as Abram the Passenger, or the Passer-thorough. Hence Abrams posterity are called Hebrews, which name seems somwhat more worthy then the name Iews, because the name Iews came but from Iudah, Iacobs son the kingly stock. To Hebre [...]s by nation, but now become Christians by profession, this Epistle was written. Some think the Apostle wrote only to those Hebrews that dwelt in Ierusalem and Iudea, because he promises to see them, Heb. 13.23. but Peter seems to testify this Epistle was written to the dispersed Hebrews; compare 2 Pet. 3.15. and 3.1, 2. with 1 Pet. 1.1, 2. Why might not the Epistle be written to them all?
Penman of this Epistle is not so infallibly agreed upon by learned men. Some of old ascribed it to Luke, or Barnabas, or Clement, Euseb. Hist. l. 6. Platin. in vit. Petri, p. 10. and Hieronymus. Some to Barnabas, Tertullian. See Erasin. Annot. in Act. 1. p. 199. Some to Apollos, Luther in Gen. 48. fol. 643. De Luc. Osiander in Praefat. ad Hebr. Calvin himselfe, though in his Argument, before [Page 242] this Epistle, he saith, he cannot be brought to think it was Pauls, yet after seems to incline to that opinion, that Paul wrote it, Calv. Com. in Heb. 13, 13. But that Paul was Penman of this Epistle, was the unanimous opinion of all the ancient Greek writers, (except Caius mentioned by Nicephorus l. 4. c. 34.) and of divers Latin Authors, ancient and moderne. See Gerh. loc. com. de Script. sacr. loc. 1. Exeges. Sect. 275. and D. Pareus Proem in ep. ad Hebr. Sect. 1. G. Whitaker disp. de sacr. script. q. 1. c. ult. That the Apostle Paul was Penman of this Epistle, may be evinced by divers considerable Arguments, As
[Page 247]These Arguments may strongly perswade that the Apostle Paul was Penman of this Epistle, and consequently, that this Epistle is of Apostolicall, yea of divine Authority, as well as his other Epistles. Nor are the objections usually brought to the contrary, of such difficulty, but that they may easily receive satisfactory Answers. And are answered by Bez. Pareus and Piscator in their Prologue before this Epistle. Gerh. exeges. loc. Com. 1. de script. sacr. cap. 10. Sect. 277. &c.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, See in former Table.
That it was not written in Hebrew by P [...]ul, an Hebrew to the Hebrews, and so translated into Greek, by Luke or Barnabas as some think, viz. Clem Alexan. S [...]rom. l. 4. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 3 [...]. Hieronym. in Catal. script. illustr. &c. But rather that Paul wrote this Epistle at first in Greek, may be probably believed upon these ensuing grounds, vid. Fran. Iunium paral. l. 3. in c. 9. hujus Epist. p. 479.
1. The stile and phrase of this Epistle [Page 248] seems rather to Grecize, then to Hebraize, there being fewer Hebraismes in this Epistle, then in Pauls other Epistles.
2. The places alledged out of the old Testament, are not alledged according to the Hebrew originall, but the Greek version of the LXXII.
3. The Hebrew names are interpreted, as Melchi-zedek, King of righteousnesse, and Salem, peace, Heb. 7.1, 2.
4. Most Iewes then understood the Greek tongue, especially those that lived in Asia Minor.
5. Peter and Iames wrote their Epistles to the dispersed Iewes in Greek, and Paul wrote all his other Epistles to the Gentiles in Greek; why then should we imagine this to be written in Hebrew?
6. The Ancient writers testifie not, that they have seen any originall Hebrew Copy of this Epistle.
Occasion, seemes to be the infirmity and affliction of the believing Hebrews. For the whole current of the Epistle, seems to intimate, That though [Page 249] they had entertained Christ, yet they adhered too much to Moses and the Leviticall Priesthood, and perhaps some of them had some hesitancy about Christ, whether he were the promised Messiah: and yet for their entertaining of Christ so farre as they did, they seem not only to be reproached by their Countreymen, as Apostates from the Law, but were greatly persecuted for Christ; the Apostle understanding this their s [...]ate, wrote to instruct and support them herein; vid. Athanas. in Synops.
Scope. For confirmation and comfort, of the weak and afflicted Hebrews, to evidence that Iesus Christ is true God and man, like us in all things, (only sin excepted,) and therefore the only true Messiah, promised in the Old Testament, and exhibited in the New; that he is the Churches only King, Prophet and Priest, able to save all that come to him to the uttermost, having by offering up himselfe once, for ever perfected them that are sanctified, and abrogated the Leviticall Priesthood and law, and therefore that they ought to believe in him, persevere in [Page 250] faith, and walk worthy of Christ and his Gospel.
Principall parts. to this end. This Epistle is partly Doctrinall, partly Practicall.
Thus of the Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the believing Hebrewes.
Now follow seven other Epistles, some of them evidently, the rest of them probably, written to believing Hebrews. viz. The Epistle of Iames, Jam. 1.1. The two Epistles of Peter; compare 1 Pet. 1.1, 2. with 2 Pet. 1.1.2. & 3.1. The first Epistle of Iohn seems probably written to al the believing Hebrews, especially in Asia Minor; for 1. the Greek title cals it a Catholique or generall Epistle Zanch. Prolegom. in 1 Ioan. Ep. p. 6, Bez. Annot. in 1 Ioan. Because generally written to al the Jewes. (Though some think it was written to the Parthians, among whom were many Jewes of the old Captivity and dispersion of the tenne Tribes, whence Parthians are thought to be named in the first place, Act. 2.9. Possilius in Indic. operum Augustin. August. l. 2. Q. Evang. c. 39.) 2. The [Page 253] very matter of the Epistle being directed against the blasphemous errou [...]s broached among the Iewes, especially those of Ebion and Cerinthus against the Divinity of Christ, seemes to imply that it was principally written to the Iewe [...]. The second Epistle of Iohn is to an Elect Lady, probably a believing Hebrew, of great wealth and worth. For he warns both her and her children of the Heresies and seducers that opposed the person of Christ after the manner of his first Epistle. And he intimates his intention of visiting them shortly. Gaius, [...]o whom he wrote his third Epistle, is not obscurely intimated there to be a believing Jew, 3 Ioh. v. 1, 2, 6, 7. As Piscat. in loc. notes. Finally the Epistle of Iude seemes written to the dispersed believing Iewes. 1 In the Greek title it being called Catholike or Generall. 2 And for the matter of it being of like nature with 2 of Pet. even as an Abstract of it; against the Seducers of those times, as the samenesse of words and phrase import.
These seven Epistles are by some called, Catholique; by some Canonicall.
[Page 254] Catholique, or Generall; not in respect of the universall concernment of the matters contayned in them, for such is the matter of Pauls Epistles also: but in respect of the parties to whom these Epistles are written, viz. Not to any particular Church, as the Epistle to the Romanes, Corinth, &c. Nor to particular persons as the Epistle to Timothy, Titus, Philemon: But generally to the believing Iewes dispersed in severall Countries. In this respect divers Latin, especially Greek writers call them Catholique, viz. Greek Scholiast. (as Bez. Annot. ante Epist. Iac. observes.) Origen apud Euseb. Hist. l. 6. c. 19. Dionys. Alexandrin. apud Euseb. l. 7. c. 20. Eusebiu [...] Hist. l. 2. c. 22. Cyril Hierosolym. Catech. 17. Hieronym▪ in Catal. Script. &c. Though properly the second and third Epistle of Iohn cannot be called Catholique, yet being joyned to Iohn's first Epistle, which is Catholique, by use they come to be so called, though abusively.
Canonicall; not that these seven Epistles onely, or peculiarly, among al [...] others are Canonicall and A [...]thentique; [Page 255] that were to derogate from other Epistles of Paul; but because they contain Canons or Rules of Christian life. Ger. loc. [...]om. exeg. loc. 1. c. 10. §. 291. Beza thinks they were by mistake called Canonicall (perhaps for Catholicall) for 1. why should not also Pauls Epistles be called Canonicall? 2. Greek writers do not so call them. 3. Latins have, though groundlesly, doubted of the authority of the Epistle of Iames, and second of Peter. Therefore its not probable they would call them Canonicall. Bez. Annot. ante Epist. Iacob. & D. Pareus in prolegom. in Epist. Iacobi.
James.
THe Catholique Epistle of JAMES the Apostle. So stiled in the Greek Copies. Bez.
Penman hereof was Iames. Iam. [...].1. Iames in Greek and Latine is the same with the Hebrew Iakob, which signifies A supplanter. Gen. 25.25.27. [Page 256] 36. But what Iames this was, is not so easily determined. There were three of that name (as some learned Authors are of opinion) two of them Apostles, and one of the 70 Disciples, viz. 1. Iames the sonne of Zebedee, brother to Iohn, Matth. 4.21.22. & 10.2. He was with Christ at his transfiguration, Mat. 17.1. He was called Iames the greater, either in respect of his age, or of his stature, or of his calling to the Apostleship. The Syriack interpreter seems to ascribe this Epistle to this Iames, as Tremellius renders it, Tres Epistolae, &c. i. e▪ Three Epistles of three Apostles before whose eyes our Lord did trans-figure himselfe, viz. Of Iames, Peter, and Iohn. But (as Pareus notes, Proem. in Epist. Iac.) the Kings edition translated by G. Fabritius hath it thus, In nomine Domini I [...]shua Meschicho sigillamus tres Epistolas: Iaakoub, & Petri, & Iouchanon. i. e. In the name of the Lord Iesus the Messiah, we Seale the three Epistles of Iames, and Peter, and Iohn. This speakes not particularly of Iames the greater. Besides, this Iames was pu [...] to death by Herod Agrippa, in the second [Page 257] yeare of Claudius. See Act. 12.1, 2. but this Epistle seemes to be writt [...]n afterwards to the convert Iewes dispersed, afte [...] Claudius had cast both Iewes and Christians out of the City of Rome, Act. 18.1, 2. Su [...]ton in Claud. c. 25.2. Iames the sonne of Alpheus, an Apostle also, Matth. 10.3. Act. 1.3. Brother of I [...]de, Iud. 1. Called sometimes Iames the lesse, for distinction from the former Iames, Mark. 15.40. and the brother of the Lord, Gal. 1.19. Matth. 13.55. Mark. 6.3. Either 1 because he was the sonne of Ioseph (the supposed Father of Christ) by a former wife, as divers both Greeke and Latin Fathers think See Iacob. Laurentii Com. in la. 1.1. p. 1 [...].12. Or rather [...] he is called the Lords brother (after the Hebrewes manner of speaking) because he was Cousin germane to him, his Mother being that Mary wife of Cleophas, (as some thinke) which was Sister to the blessed Virgin, Mark. 16.1. Hieronym. advers. He [...]uid. lib. Theodoret. in Epist. ad Gal. cap. 1. Ignatius thinks he was called the Lords Brother because he so exactly resembled Christ in countenance, and conversation, [Page 258] as if they had been twins, and that he was surnamed Iustus. Ignat. in Epist. 2 ad Ioan. Seniorem. This Iames is conceived to be Penman of this Epistle, it being most suitable to an Apostle of unlimited Commission to take care of all the Tribes dispersed. The matter of the Epistle becomes an Apostolicall Spirit. Nor (saith Pareus) doth any thing solidly contradict this opinion; who there answers objections against it. Therefore if the Epistle be Apostolicall, it is questionlesse of Divine Authority. 3. As for the third Iames called Oblias, of the number of the seventy Disciples, Bishop of Ierusalem, some question whether there were such an one; others count it most unlikly that he should be Penman of this Generall Epistle, that was confined him selfe to a Particular charge.
Occasion and Scope. Iames taking notice that the twelve Tribes dispersed were under great Temptations and tryalls of affliction; and also that too many among them contented themselves with a fruitlesse profession of Faith without the concurrent practice of Holinesse: [Page 259] w [...]ites unto them, principally to comfort and support them under their present sharp tryals and tribulations, Iam. 1.2. &c. 5.7, to 12. As also to exhort them to joyne good works and an holy life to their Faith, without which their Faith was but a dead carkasse, c. 2.14. to the end.
Principall parts. In this Epistle are,
I Peter.
THe first Catholique Epistle of PETER the Apostle. So called, partly in reference to the dispersed Jewes to whom generally this Epistle is directed (as was fore noted); partly in respect of Peter the Apostle Penman of it, 1 Pet. 1.1.
PETER [ [...]] a Greek name. Not the Proper name, but rather the Surname of this Apostle, Act. 10.5. His proper name was Simon, an Hebrew name [...] i. e. An hearer. From [...] To Heare. Act. 10.5. Ioh. 1.43. Christ surnamed him Peter. This surname was 1 Promised to him by Christ when he was first called to be Christs Disciple, [Page 261] Ioh. 1.43. 2. Given to him by Christ when he called him to the Apostleship, &c. Mark. 10.16. Luk. 6.14. 3. Confirmed to him by Christ also, upon Peters firme and excellent confession of Christ, Matt. 16.17. Peter in Greek is the same with Kephas or Kipha in Syriack, both signifie a Stone. Christ gave him this name by Anticipation, in reference to that firm and solid Confession of Faith touching Christ, which Peter should, yea did make; and on which Faith confessed, as on a Rock, Christ did promise to build his Church, &c. Matth. 16.16. &c. Which was fulfilled, Peter preaching the first Sermons whereby both Iewes and Gentiles were converted to Christ, and the first foundation of the Christian Church after Christ was laid, Act. 2.14. &c. 10 34. &c. Which was the Priviledge conferred by Christ upon Peter peculiarly above all the Apostles. Peter was the sonne of Iona, and brother of Andrew; by trade they were Fishers, whence Christ called them to be Fishers of men, Matth. 4.18. [...]eter had his notable Eminencies; As 1. [...] [Page 262] singular courage, zeale, and boldnesse for expressing himselfe, Matth. 26.3. Luke 22, 23. Act. 2.14. Hereupon counted one of the three pillers of the Primitive Church, Gal. 2.9. 2. He made that admirable Confession of Christ, Matth. 16.16. 3. He was one of the three which Christ took up into the Mount to see his glorious transfiguration, Matth. 17.1. &c. Mark. 9.2. Luk. 9.28. 4. He was one of the three which Christ took out from his Apostles to accompany him in his bitter Agony, Matth. 26.36, 37. &c. 5. Christ after his resurrection eminently restored him to the exercise of his Pastorall office, by his threefold profession of his sincere love to Christ, after his threefold denyall of Christ, Ioh. 21.15, 16, 17. He had also his remarkable Infirmities. 1. Inconsiderately cut off Malchus his Eare, Matth. 26.51. &c. 2. Self-confidently presumed against denying Christ, Matth. 26.31. to 36. 3. Shamefully denyed Christ thrice, and every time worse then other, Matth. 26.69, to 75▪ 4. And walked not with a right foot in the beginning of his Ministry, [Page 263] drawing the Gentiles to Iudaize among the Iewes, &c. Gal. 2.14. &c.
When and Whence this Epistle was written. It's more then probable Peter wrote this Epistle by Sylvanus to the Iewes of the dispersion while he was now at Babylon, 1 Pet. 5.12, 13. There was a Babylon in Chaldea, Psal. 137. A Babylon in Egypt. And in resemblance hereunto the mysticall Babylon, viz. Rome, Rev. 14.1. & 16.19. & 17.5. & 18.2▪ 10, 21. Now Papists themselves upon this place generally contend, that here by Babylon is meant Rome, that they may prove Peter was at Rome, Fenardent. in loc. But they forget how herein they confesse Rome to be that wicked Babylon destined to destruction, Rev. 17. and 18. Luther leaves every man to abound in his own sense which Babylon it was. Pareus thinks that Babylon in Chaldea is to be here understood, where Peter the Apostle of the Circumcision preached to the Iewes: and that no one reason can be given why Peter should conceale the name of Rome, had he intended Rome. D. Par. Com. in 1 Pet. 5.13. From that [Page 264] phrase, if any man suffer as a Christian, 1 Pet. 4.16. intimates that this Epistle was written after Antioch, had received the faith, for there the disciples were first called Christians, Act. 11.26. and it was about the same time, that Iames was crowned with Martyrdome, Act. 12.1, 2.
Occasion. The strangers that came up to Ierusalem at Pentecost, were many of them converted by Peters Sermon, and so baptized Acts 2. to whom therefore Peter here writes, as to new borne babes, 1 Pet. 2.2. weak, and as yet unsetled in the faith, and upon their returne into their owne countreys, much exercised for Christs sake with afflictions and crosses, as the current of the Epistle manifests.
Scope. That therefore the Apostle as a spirituall father, might confirme these his children in faith, against all troubles and persecution, he writes to them all this Epistle, assuring them, that the faith or doctrine of grace wherein they stood, was the true grace of God, and cons [...]quently he exhorts and stirs them up to persevere therein. To grow and abound [Page 265] in grace and godlinesse. This the great drift of both his Epistles, See 1 Pet. 5.12. and 2 Pet. 3.1. &c.
Principall parts of the Epistle to this end, are,
II Peter:
THe II. Catholique Epistle of PETER the Apostle. The Apostle himselfe cals this his Second Epistle. He writes it to the same people, to whom he wrote his first, viz. To the believing Jews dispersed, and in effect to the same end, 2 Pet. 3.1, 2. and 1.12, 13, 14, 15.
Some few writers have doubted of the Authority of this Epistle, (as also of that of Iames, of the second and third of Iohn, and of the Epistle of Iude,) as Eusebius [Page 267] intimates, Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 22. Hieronym. in Catal. vir. illustr. in Petro. Nor is it found in the Syriack version.
B [...]t divers cogent Arguments perswade us that this is an Apostolicall Epistle, and written by Peter, As 1. The inscription mentions the same Penman of this Epistle with the first, viz. Simon Peter a servant and an Apostle of Iesus Christ. 2 Pet. 1.1. He that wrote this Epistle, testifies, that he must shortly put off this his Tabernacle, as our Lord Iesus Christ hath shewed him, 2 Pet. 1.14. to whom did Christ shew this but to Peter? Iohn 21.17. 3. He that wrote this Epistle, was with Christ upon the Mount at his transfiguration, beheld his majesty, —and heard that voice of the father from heaven, when he was with Christ on the holy Mount, This is my beloved sonne in whom I am well pleased, 2 Pet. 1.16, 17, 18. Now there were only three, viz. Peter, Iames and Iohn in the Mount with Christ, at his transfiguration, Matth. 17.1, 2. therefore it must be written by one of them three, (and by whomsoever of [Page 268] them, it is of Apostolicall, yea of divine Authority,) but unto Iames or Iohn none ever yet ascribed it, nor is there any reason so to do, but many to the contrary: therefore it must needs be confessed to be written by Peter. 4. He that writes this Epistle, cals it his Second Epistle, and intimates he wrote them both to the same persons, viz. the dispersed believing Jews. compare 2 Pet. 1.1. and 3.1. with 1 Pet. 1.1. 5. He that wrote this Epistle cals Paul his beloved brother, commends him, and approves the Authority of his Epistles, 2 Pet. 3.15, 16. which were too much for any, but for an Apostolicall pen. 6. An holy Apostolicall spirit breathes throughout this whole Epistle, both in his exhortations to holy duties, monitions against false-teachers and Apostacy, and predictions of things to come. 7. The stile and phrase Apostolicall and consonant enough to that of Peters first Epistle. Hist. Magd. Cent. 1. l. 2. c. 4. 8. To all these may be added the consent of ancient Writers, that count this Epistle Canonicall and Apostolicall, Concil. Laodicen. Can. 59. Carthaginens. [Page 269] 3. Athanas. in Synops. Damascen. l. 4. c. 18. Epiphan. Heres. 76. August. l. 2. De Doctrin. Christian. c. 8. And Beda in Comment. wonders how any should doubt of the Authority of this Epistle, when the Penman hath put his name in the beginning, and testifies he was with the Lord in the holy mount.
So that this Epistle is of unquestionable authority.
Peter made this Epistle a little before his death, 2 Pet. 1.14.
Occasion & Scope. Peter considering, that shortly he must put off the Tabernacle of his body 2 Pet. 1.14. that some were too negligent of making their calling and election sure; that there then were, and afterwards would be false teachers and seducers in the Church, and scoffers against the second comming of Christ; Therefore Peter wrote this Epistle to stirre them up, by putting them in remembrance of those things which had been preached among them, 2 Pet. 1.12, 13, 14. & 3.1, 2. specially inciting them to progresse in grace, to watchfulnesse against false teachers and scoffers, and to a preparednesse for the comming of [Page 270] Christ, as the whole current of the Epistle evidences.
Principall parts.
I John.
THe first Catholique Epistle of JOHN the Apostle. This Epistle hath this Title in all the ancient manuscript Copies. Bez. Annot. ante hanc [Page 271] Ep. Which as Beza there well advertiseth us, we are thus to understand, viz. The first Epistle of Iohn the Apostle which is Catholick; for of all Iohn's Epistles, this only is Catholique or Generall, the other two being particular. viz. The 2d to the Elect Lady and her children; The 3d to Gaius, and therefore it were improper to call it the first Generall Epistle in any other sense.
Penman of this Epistle, is Iohn the Apostle, as is evident. 1. From the Greek Title, [...] i. e. The first Catholique Epistle of John the Apostle; thus all ancient Greek Copies have it. Bez. 2. From his manner of speaking of Christ, asserting his divinity in divers passages of this Epistle, as 1 Iohn 1.1, 2. & 2.22.23, 24. & 5.5, 6, 7. &c. and calling him the Word 1 Iohn 1.1. and 1 Iohn 5.7. Iohn being most sublime in asserting the Godhead of Christ, Iohn 1.1, 2, 3. &c. and Rev. often; and no writers in the New Testament, stiling Christ the Word but Iohn in his Gospel, Iohn 1.1, 14. in his Revelation, Rev. 1.2. and 19.13. and here in this Epistle. [Page 272] 3. From that eminent and singular Character of Iohns spirit. viz. The spirit of love, most predominant and conspicuous all along this Epistle, as in his Gospel and Revelation. Iohn was the disciple whom Jesus loved above all his disciples. Iohn 13.23. & 19.26. and 20.2. and 21.7, 20. He was a meer compound of sweetest love; in all his writings, breaths nothing in a manner but love ▪ Hence excellently Calvin, Haec Epistola, prorsus digna est ejus discipuli spiritu, qui prae aliis ideò a Christo dilectus fuit, ut ipsum nobis familiarem redderet. i. e. This Epistle is altogether worth the Spirit of that disciple, which was therefore beloved of Christ above the rest, that he might render him familiar unto us. Calv. Argum. in 1. Ioan. Of Iohn, see more in Annot. on Gosp. of Iohn. Iohn therefore being the undoubted Penman of this Epistle, it is of unquestionable Authority, Eusebius and Hieronymus testify, That there never was doubt in the Church about the Author or Authority of this Epistle. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 25. Hieronym, in Catalog. Augustin cals it satis dulcem & satis memorabilem in Ecclesia dei, quód in [Page 273] ipsa charitas maximé commendetur. i. e. A most sweet Epistle and most memorable in the Church of God, because love is especially commended therin. Aug. Praef. in 1. Ioan. Ep. and saith that orbem ter [...]arum ipsa edificavit, i. e. It hath edified the world, Aug. Tract. 7.
When and Whence this Epistle was written, Iohn wrote his Gosp. at Ephesus, Iraen. l. 3. c. 1. advers. haeres. This Epistle seemes to be written after his Gospel. He wrote it when he was now old; thinks Hierome. And being old, he departed not from Asia, therefore is probable he wrote it at Ephesus, Zauch. Prolegom. in 1. Ioan. p. 6. Iohn lived after the other Apostles and wrote after them.
Occasions. I. Iohn observed that in his daies there were many hereticall Teachers, Seducers, which he cals Anti-christs, (and by a propheticall spirit foresaw that afterwards there would arise many more.) Epiphanius reckon [...] up these before and in Iohn's dayes, viz. 1. Simonians. 2. Menandrians. 3. Saturnilians. 4. Basilidians. 5. Nicolaitanes▪ of whom Rev. 2. 6. Gnosticks. 7. Carpocratians, [Page 274] from Carpocrates in Asia; who taught men must sinne, and do the will of all the devils; otherwise they could not enter into heaven. 8. Cerinthians and Merinthians, from Cerinthus and Morinthus, who denyed Christs divinity, said he was not before Mary, that he was a meere man. 9. Habionits, who held the same heresie. 10. Nazaraei, that urged Moses law, See Epiphan. in Panario. l. 1. Tom. 2. II. Iohn took notice of divers carnall believers, who made great profession of knowledge, faith and piety towards God, who yet lived ungodly to the scandall of the Gospel. III. Finally, Iohn considered how necessary it was to encourage true believers in faith, and promote them to assurance of their interest in eternall life. These gave Iohn Occasion of writing this Epistle by way of remedy.
Scope. The blessed Apostle Iohn in this Epistle principally levels at these three ends.
This last end is clearly professed in 1 Iohn 5.13. These things have I written unto you, that believe on the name of the Sonne of God, that yee may know that yee have eternall life.— And therefore it is most singularly observable of this sweet and precious Epistle, what a multitude of Marks, Signs or Discoveries of believer's spirituall State, are here plainly and purposely laid downe for this end, more then in any other so short a piece of Scripture in the whole Bible. Which Signes are here reduced to severall heads, and set downe for the help and comfort of the Readers, in some of which, at least the weakest (if a sincere Christian▪) may find abundant soule-refreshing, and heart-establishment.
By these Evidences, Signes or Characters of our spirituall Estate, clearly laid downe in this Excellent Epistle, the weak in faith may become strong in Assurance, and the strong may become stronger: yea all that truly believe in the name of the Son of God, (if the fault be not their owne) may hereby come to know, that they have eternall life. All which Evidences I shall indeavour very shortly (God willing,) more fully to open and unfold in a distinct Treatise, called, ☞ Believers Evidences for eternall life. A subject which, I hope, to gracious hearts will be most welcome and seasonable, in these sad afflicting dayes; To help forward their Assurance for heaven, when they can have no assurance of any thing on earth,
Principall parts. in reference to these excellent ends are.
II John.
THe second Epistle of JOHN the Apostle. This Epistle of Iohn is nor, as the first, Catholique or Generall: but Particular, being written to particular persons, viz. The Elect Lady, and her children. Who she was, is not known; Some think that ELECT was her prop [...]r name: but that's improbable, for then Iohn would not have said, To the Elect Lady; but, To the Lady ELECT. Some turne this into an Allegory, and say that by the Elect Lady Iohn intended the whole Christian Church: But this is most unlikely, and plainly repugnant to this Epistle it selfe, for, 1. To write to the whole Christian Church under the Notion of an Elect Lady is so unusuall, that we find no such thing done in all the New-Testament. 2. This Epistle not onely mentions this Lady and her children, v. 1.4. But also sends her salutations from the children of her Elect [Page 284] Sister, v. 13. 3. The Apostle speakes of his intention to come and see her, and speake face to face. Which cannot be understood of the whole Christian Church, ver. 12. She is thought to be some eminent religious Matron of great Estate, who much relieved and supported the members of the Church in her dayes. Bez. Annot. in 2 Ioan. Piscat. in 2 Ioan.
Penman. Some thinke was another Iohn then the Apostle, as is testifyed by Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 39. But this seems to be a plain mistake, for 1. The Greek Copies call it in the Title, The second Epistle of Iohn the Apostle. 2. The matter of the Epistle is not only Divine and Apostolicall; but notably owns Iohn to be the writer, wherein Christian love, walking in the truth, and taking heed of Seducers and Antichrists, are pressed as in the first Epistle of Iohn. So that this is Iohns genuine language. Compare these passages among others, viz. 1 Ioh. 2▪ 7. with 2 Ioh. 5. — and 1 Ioh. 2.23. with 2 Ioh. 9. — and 1 Ioh. 4.1, 2, 3. with 2 Ioh. 7. — and 1 Ioh. 5.3. with 2 Ioh. [Page 285] 6. &c. 3. The Salutation is plainly Apostolicall. ver. 1, 2, 3. And notably relisheth of Iohn's Spirit. 4. Both ancient and modern Writers, account this Epistle Canonicall, and ascribe it unto Iohn the Apostle, Concil. Carthagin. 3. Can. 4.7. Concil. Laodic. c. ult. Hieronym, in Epist. 85. ad Euagrium. August. de Doctrin. Christian, l. 2. c. 8. Sentent. Episcoporum Concil. Carthaginens. apud Cyprian. Sent. 81. Cyprian op. edit. 1593. p. 449. Beda. Piscat. Bez. in 2 Iohan. So that this Epistle being written by Iohn the Apostle, is of unquestionable authority.
Occasion. Some thinke that Iohns familiar Christian acquaintance with this Elect Lady, gave him Occasion of writing this Epistle. Others rather think it was written against the Antichristian Heresie of Basilidis and his followers, who taught that Christ was not a true man but a phantasm, and therfore that he neither did, nor suffer'd those things which he is said to do and suffer. Epiphan. Heres. 24. Compare 2 Ioh. 7.
Scope. To incite the Elect Lady and her children, To persevere in the truth, [Page 286] and carefully to shun all hereticall Seducers, that bring not Christs Doctrine. A [...] also to adorne the truth, with love and good workes.
Principall parts. To this end, are,
III John.
THe third Epistle of IOHN the Apostle. This Epistle is not Generall, but Particular; written to Gaius.
Penman of this Epistle, also was Iohn the Apostle, and therefore it is Authentique and Canonicall. Both these are ev [...]dent by all the foure Reasons alleadged touching Iohn's second Epistle. And the word, phrases, and method of these two Epistles harmoniously agree, as an in [...]entive Reader may well observe. Iohn directs this Epistle, To the well-beloved Gaius, but what Gaius this was is not so evident. Scripture mentions three persons of this name, viz. 1. Gaius of Macedonia, Act. 19.21, 2. Gaius of Derbe, Act. 20.4. 3. Gaius of Corinth, 1 Cor. 1.14. Whom Paul cals, Gaius mine host, and of the whole Church, writing from Corinth to the Romanes. Rom. [Page 288] 16.23. This Gaius was a man eminent for Hospitality, especially to the Ministers and members of the Church of Christ. Perhaps this Gaius of Corinth was the Gaius to whom here Iohn also writes, for 1. He is singularly commended here for his charity and hospitality, 3 Ioh. ver. 5, 6. 2. The consent of writers subscribes hereunto. See Lorin. Comment. in 3 Iohan. Epist. ver. 1. However he was a very eminent man in the Church.
When or where this Epistle was written, is not certainly known.
Occasion. The bountifulnesse and Hospitablenesse of Gaius, which Iohn had some occasion to improve towards some Ministers that went to preach to the Gentiles, who seeme to have brought this Epistle from Iohn to Gaius, See ver. 6, 7, 8.
Scope, To request Gaius, according to his wonted bounty and benevolence to the Saints, to bring forward on their journey certain Ministers that went to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles. To brand Diotrephes, and commend to him Demetrius.
[Page 289] Principall parts.
Jude.
THe Catholique (or generall) Epistle of the Apostle JUDAS. Thus denominated, from the Penman who wrote it, and from the persons to whom it was written, viz. the same to whom Peter wrote his second Epistle; For substance being both the same.
Penman. Iudas the brother of Iames, Jud. 1. This is Originally an Hebrew name, viz. [...] Iehudah, i. e. Praise; from [...] Hodah, i. e. He hath confessed, he hath praised. This name was first given to the fourth sonne of Iakob, because at his birth his mother praised the Lord. Gen. 29.35. Matth. 2.6. There were two Apostles that had this name, viz. 1. Iudas Iscariot that had the bag, and betrayed Christ, Matth. 10.4. And afterwards in some sort repented, Restored the thirty peeces, hanged himselfe, Matth. 27.3, 4, 5. So that he burst asunder in the middest, and [Page 291] all his bowels gushed out, and so he went to his own place, Act. 1.18, 25. 2. Iudas the brother of Iames, Luk. 6.16. Act. 1.13. viz. Of Iames the sonne of Alpheus, who was famous at Ierusalem among the Apostles, Act. 15. And 21.28. Where he is conceived to keep his chief abode, that he might teach the Iewes that resorted thither out of all Nations; unto which Iewes especially Iudas here seemes principally to write, and therefore mentions Iames. Bez. Annot. in Iud. 1. This Iudas is also called Lebbeus, i. e. Hearty; and surnamed Thaddaeus which is in Syriack the same with Iudas in Hebrew, Matth. 10.3. This Iudas is supposed to preach the Gospel in Mesopotamia, Pontus, Aegypt and Persia, where the Magi slew him for his free and faithfull reproving of their superstitions.
Authority of this Epistle, (though suspected heretofore by some, and that upon very inconsiderable grounds; Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 2. c. 23. Yet) is now generally acknowledged to be Divine; especially considering that, 1. Iudas the brother of Iames, one of the [Page 292] Apostles wrote it, Iude 1. 2 Pet. 1.21. 2. The matter of it, yea and most of the very phrases and words, are the same with those of the second Epistle of Peter, if diligently compared. See the Parallel by P. Pareus Com. in Iude. 3. Antiquity have received this Epistle as Authentique, and part of the Divine Canon. Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 2. c. 23. and lib. 3. c. 22. Hieronym. in Catal. vir Illustr. Concil. Laodicens. Concil. Carthaginens. Athanasus, Augustine and others who recite the Catalogue of the Books of Scripture, reckon Iudes Epistle among the rest.
Arguments or Objections to the contrary are invalid. These the principall.
Object. 1. This Epistle recites Histories no where else to be found in Scripture, as the contending of Michael the Archangel, with the Devil about the body of Moses, Iude 9.
Answ. 1. Divers stories are pointed at in New Testament. Which we find not in the Old Testament. As that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses, 2. Tim. 3.8. That at Mount Sinai, Moses said, I exceedingly feare and quake, [Page 293] Heb. 12.21. Shall therefore these Epistles Authority be suspected? 2. These stories (though formerly unwritten, but happily derived by tradition from hand to hand, yet) now are written by guidance of the Spirit of God. And the writing of them rather assures us of the truth of these Histories, then detracts from the Authority of the Books wherein they are recorded. 3. This story hath some footsteps in Deut. 34.9. Whereupon some say, The Angel would have buried Moses, but the Devil challenged Moses to be his own, because of his killing the Aegyptian, and therefore withstood him. But others better; God knowing Israels pronenesse to Idolatry, least they should commit Idolatry with Moses dead body (as after they did with the brazen Serpent) buried him no man knowing where, and the Devil, endeavouring to discover it, the Angell withstood him.
Obj. 2. Iude mentions the Prophesie of Enoch, ver. 14, 15. The Old Testament hath no such Prophecie.
Ans. 1. Some thinke in Iudes time there was a Canonicall Book of Enoch [Page 294] extant, as Tertull. lib. de Habit muliebr. Beda com. in Ep. Iud. 2. Others say better then they, suppose Enoch's Book were Apocryphall, yet in Apocryphall Books ther's some truth, and why may not this Apostle alleadge this passage out of Enochs Prophecie, without approving that whole Book, or disvesting this Epistle of its Authority; as well as the Author to the Hebrew, alleadge some passages out of the Book of Maccabees, Heb. 11. Or Paul some Sentences out of Heathen Authors and Poets, 1 Cor. 15.32. Tit. 1.12. Act. 17.28. 1 Tim. 2.12. & 5.23. Tit. 1.3. 3. Others think this Prophecy of Enoch was rather reall then verball, viz. Respecting the Order of the Patriarchs, that as Death by reason of sinne had Reigned over the six first Fathers, Adam Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalelel, Iared, but could not touch the seventh, Enoch: so death shall Reigne ove [...] the world 6000 yeeres, (which shall so long continue) but in the 7000. yeeres, eternall life shall begin; and death shall be swallowed up in Victory. 4. But others best of all understand here, as the Text seems [Page 295] evidently to carry it, Enochs verbal Prophecie, which though not written, yet Iude received by Tradition, or rather by Revelation of the same spirit of God by which Enoch prophecyed, and here recorded as part of the Divine Canon.
Obj. 3. Jude alleadges other Apostles sayings, ver. 17. Therefore seemes rather to be a Disciple of the Apostles, then an Apostle himselfe, especially seeing he cals not himselfe an Apostle, but the servant of Jesus Christ, ver. 1. And therefore this Epistle not authenticall.
Ans. 1. Though it could be proved Iude was no Apostle, yet it therefore followes not, his Epistle is not Authenticall. Mark and Luke, not Apostles, yet the three Books they wrote are of unquestionable authority. The authority of Books of Scriptur are not from the Penmen writing them, but from the Spirit of God inditing them. 2. Daniel cites Ieremiah, Dan. 9.2. Ezekiel cites Daniel, Ezek. 14.19. Were they therefore not Prophets, but Prophets Disciples? Peter alleadgeth Pauls Epistles, 2 Pet. 3.15, 16. Was Peter therefore no Apostle but onely a [Page 296] Disciple? 3. Iudes alleadging the other Apostles deroga [...]es not from the authority of his Epistle, but proves that Iude wrote after both Paul and Peter, in whose Epistle these predictions are extant, 1 Tim. 4.1. &c. 2 Tim. 3.1. 2 Pet. 2.1. &c. 4. Finally, though Iudas here call not himselfe an Apostle, that argues not therefore he was not an Apostle. Iames in his Epistle, Iohn in his three Epistles, Paul in his Epistle to the Philippians, and in both his Epistles to the Thessalonians superscribe not themselves Apostles ▪ were they therefore no Apostles? But Iudas here stiles himselfe the brother of Iames, and that's full as much as if he had stiled himselfe an Apostle, for the texts are expresse that Iudas the Brother of Iames was one of the twelve Apostles. See Luk. 6.16. Act. 1.13.
Obj. 4. But Iude the Apostle taught in Persia, and therefore had he written this Epistle, he would rather have written it in the Persian, then Grecian tongue.
Ans. 1. Its not infallibly certain that Iude was in Persia when he wrote this Epistle. 2. No necessity of the [Page 297] Apostles writing in the language of the people with whom they then lived. Matthew lived among the Ethiopians, Paul at Rome when he wrote some of his Epistles, yet they wrote not in Ethiopick or Latin, but in Greek. Greek being then the most common language in the world, the Holy Ghost would have Greek to be the Originall language for New Testament, as the Hebrew especially for the Old. And Iudes Epistle is Catholique or Generall, and therefore was written in Greek the generall tongue.
When and Where this Epistle was written is uncertaine. Some think this Apostle was in Persia, or Asia Minor when he wrote it, viz. A yeere before he dyed, and that he there dyed, anno 68. after Christ. Niceph. l. 4. c. 40.44. Probably he wrote after both Paul and Peter, to whose writings he seems to have reference, v. 17. the whole Epistle is as an Abstract of Peters second Epistle.
Occasion, seems from the current of the Epistle, to be those abominable heresies of the Simonians, Nicolaitanes, Gnosticks, &c. abounding in those times [Page 298] times who held Sin to be indifferent, womē & al things to be common, &c. Oecumen. Epiphan. in Haeres. Gnostic. Sec. Iud. 3.4.
Scope. To warne all the faithfull in those times of the cursed and detestable Hereticks and Seducers that were cunningly crept in among them, that they contend earnestly for the truth against all their damnable errours and Heresies; and for purity and holinesse of life, against all their impure lustfull licentious and ungodly p [...]actices. Iude 3, 4, 8, 10, 20, 21.
Principall parts. To this end are,
1. By examples of Gods vengeance for like impieties and impurities in former times, viz. Upon Israel for unbeliefe, ver. 5. Upon Angels for Apostacy, ver. Upon Sodom and Gomorrha &c. For their lusts, ver. 7.
These examples he applyes to these Seducers,
III. THE PROPHETICAL BOOK, Viz. THE Revelat.
THE PROPHETICAL BOOK of the New Testament, prophetically foretelling what shall be the future condition of the Church of Christ in all ages, to the end of the world, is the REVELATION OF JOHN THE [Page 301] DIVINE. This may well be called a Propheticall Book; For 1 The Holy Ghost himselfe divers times stiles it A Prophecy, Rev. 1.3. and 7.10, 18.19. 2 And the nature of the Book is chiefly Propheticall, as the Series of the Book implyes; and also some passages plainly testify, that it treats of things, which must shortly come to passe, Rev. 1.1. and things which shall be hereafter, Rev. 1.19.
Title, This book in Greek is called [ [...]] i. e. The Apocalypse (or Revelation,) of John the Divine ▪ whereby are indigitated to us, both the nature of the Book, and the Penman of it.
Nature of the Book, A Revelation. so called, because it Reveals and makes known unto us secret hidden mysteries, and future events. Its true, this Revelation, is not without mixture of much intricatenesse and obscurity, (as all prophecies are enigmaticall and ambiguous to men, till they be effected, but when the time prophecied is come, then they have a more clear, and certaine exposition. So Iraen. Advers. Haeres. l. 4. c. 43.) And this to exercise the [Page 302] Reader to search out the truth, as August. de Civitat. dei, l. 20. c. 17. hath well observed.
Penman or instrumentall Author of it, viz. Iohn the Theologue or Divine. What Iohn this was, some question. Eusebius mentions two Iohns, whose monuments were to be seen at Ephesus, viz. Iohn the Evangelist, who wrote the Gospel, and 1 Epistle of John: and Iohn the Presbyter, who wrote 2. and 3. Epistle of Iohn, and the Revelation, Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 39. To him also seems to incline, Dionys. Alexandrinus in lib. de Repromissionibus, But that this is a great mistake, and that IOHN the Evangelist and Apostle was Penman of this Revelation, may be cleared by these considerations.
1. This Title attributes it to Iohn the Divine. This Epithet we read no where to be given to Iohn the Presbyter, but belongs to Iohn the Apostle and Evangelist, [ [...]] by way of peculiar emphasis, because like an Eagle he soares aloft, writes more sublimely of the Divinity of Iesus Christ, both in this Book, (in which D. Par [...]us hath observed [Page 303] XLVIII. Arguments of Christs Divinity) as also in his Gospel, Iohn 1.1. &c. and in his 1. Epistle. And the King of Spaines Bible, of Montanus Edition, hath this Greek Title before the Revelation, [ [...]] i. e. The Revelation of the Holy Apostle, and Evangelist Iohn the Divine, which Title clears this matter, and is consonant to Rev. 1.1, 2. (whether it were prefixed by Iohn, or after by the Church,) nor is it any way probable that Christ sent his Angel to any other Iohn, then to the Apostle with this Revelation.
2. Iohn the Penman of this Book is so descr [...]bed, that Iohn the Apostle and Evangelist seemes plainly to be indigitated, Revel. 1.1, 2. His servant Iohn: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the Testimony of Iesus Christ. Now how notably did Iohn beare record of the word of God, and testimony of Iesus Christ? see Iohn. 1.1.2.14. and 1 Iohn 1, 1. and 5.9. compared with Revel. 19.13.
3. The style much resembles that of Iohns Gospel and Epistles. As for instance; It is peculiar to Iohn to stile Christ, The [Page 304] word. compare Iohn 1.1.14. 1 Iohn 1.1. and 5.7. with Revel. 1.2. In his Gospell he stiles Christ the Lamb of God Iohn, 1.29.36. so in the Revelation Christ is called the Lamb at least 28. times.
4 That Iohn who wrote this Revelation, had it in the Ile Patmos made known to him, who was there for the name of God and Testimony of Iesus Christ Rev. 1.9. And Histories mention no other Iohn, but only Iohn the Apostle to be in Patmos. Banished thither by Domitian the Emperour for the Gospel's sake, neer to period of his Reigne, (as Funccius computes) about the ninety seventh year after Christ. See Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 3. c. 16. and 18.
5. To these might be added the Harmonious consent of ancient Fathers, who unanimously conclude, that Iohn the Apostle penned this Book. Dionys. Areopag. who was Pauls disciple, Act. 17. who wrote about the sixtieth year after Christ, in those writings ascribed to him, calleth the Apocalypse, A secret and mysticall vision of the beloved Disciple, Dionys. Eccles. Hierarch. c. 3. [Page 305] Iustin Martyr, who wrote in the one hundred and fiftieth year after Christ, ascribes the Apocalypse to Iohn, one of the Apostles of Christ. Iustin. in Dial. ad Tryphon. To which passage Eusebius relating, saith, Iustin mentions the Apocalypse of Iohn, plainly saying it is the Apostles, Euseb. Hist. Eccles. l. 4. c. 18. Irenaeus, who wrote in the eightieth year after Christ, saith, And what things soever Iohn the disciple of the Lord saw in the Apocylapse — Iraen. Advers. Haeres▪ l. 4 c. 50. and l. 4. c. 37. p. 373. A. Coloniae 1596. To these might be added the suffrage of many more, as of Greek Fathers, Clem. Alexand. Paedag. l. 2. c. 12. Athanas. in Synops. Epiphan. Haeres. 51.54, 76. Chrysost. Hom. 5. in Psal. 91. of Latin fathers, as Tertull. contra Marcion l. 4. Cyprian. de e [...]hort. Martyr. c. 8.10.11.12. Ambros. in Psal 50 & l. 3. de spir. sanct. c. 21. August. de Civi [...]. dei l. 20. c. 7. & de Haeres. c. 30. & de Doct. Christ. l. 2. c. 18. videantur Annot. in Irenae. l. 5. c. 30. p. 490. Colon. 1596. but in so plaine a case these may suffice.
So that by all this, its plainly evident [Page 306] that the Penman of the Revelation was Iohn the Apostle, that wrote the Gospel, and the Epistles. The unfolding of his name, and who he was more particularly, See in Annot. to Iohn's Gospel.
Authority of this Book, is not Humane, but Divine. For,
1. This book was indited by Iesus Christ himselfe the faithfull and true witnesse, who sent his Angel to testifie the same to Iohn the Apostle, and by him to the Churches. The Revelation of Iesus Christ which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to passe; and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant Iohn— Rev. 1.1. and towards the close of the book he saith, I Iesus have sent mine Angel to testify unto you these things in the Churches, Rev. 22.16. Note, this Revelation was given by Iohn the Apostle to the Churches, by an Angel to Iohn, by Iesus Christ to that Angel, by God to Iesus Christ: How punctually then is the Divine Authority of it asserted?
2. It was penned by Iohn the Apostle of Christ (who was divinly inspired & acted by the Holy Ghost) as hath bin formerly [Page 307] manifested, and therefore it is of divine Authority, especially considering that this blessed Apostle was commanded by Iesus Christ to write this Book, Saying I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and wh [...] thou seest write in a Book,—write the things which thou hast s [...]en, and the things which are, and the thing [...] which shall b [...] hereafter, Rev. 1.11 19. See also Rev. 2.1.8.12.18. and 3.1, 7, 14. and 14.13. and 19.9. and 21.5.
3. The nature of the book imports the divine Authority of it. For 1. It is eminently Propheticall, speaking of things that shall be hereafter, Rev. 1.1, 19. and 22.7, 10, 18, 19. and the prophecies of this book, are touching future events in reference to the Church to the end of the world, till the Church, the Lambs wife, shall be fully ready for compleat marriage with the Lamb, Rev. 19.7, 8, 9. So that neither ancient writers nor any other, but such as were inspired with a spirit of prophecy from the al-knowing God, could foretell these things to come, Isa [...]. 41.22. 2. In the propheticall expressions of it, [Page 308] it is consonant to other propheticall books, and gives light to them, Daniel, Zechariah, especially Ezekiel, As in the particulars of eating up the Book, Rev. 10.9, 10. with Ezek. 2.8. and 3.3. of sealing Gods promise, Rev. 7.2, 3. with Ezek. 9. of the foure living Creatures, Rev. 4.6, 7. with Ezek. 1.5.6. of Gog and Magog, Rev. 20.8. with Ezek. 38.2. and 39.1. of the measuring of the Temple and City, Rev. 21.15. with Ezek. 40.3. &c. Of the two olive trees, &c. Rev. 11.4. with Zech. 4.3, 11, 14. &c. 3. Many things foretold in this Book prophetically, are fulfilled and come to passe actually, As Interpreters have observed in many particulars. Therefore this Book is of divine Authority, Ierem. 28.9.4. Promise of explaining how long the Idolatrous and Tyrannicall Kingdome of Anti-Christ should last, was made to Daniel the Prophet, Dan. 12.4, 9. which some conceive to be fulfilled in these Apocalypticall visions, Rev. c. 11. and 12. and 13. and 17. &c. And had not Christ under the New Testament left his Church some propheticall Record, [Page 309] for her comfort against the horrid cruelty, idolatry and darknesse of the Anti-christian Dominion, showing when it should have an end, and how happy at last the Church should be, all her enemies being universally made the footstool of the Lambe; she were in a worse condition then under the Old Testament; which were absurd.
4. As the Holy Ghost by Moses, the first Penman of the Canon of the Old Testament warned the Jewes against adding to or diminishing from the word of God, yee shall not adde unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish from it, Deut. 9.2. and 12.32. So by the Apostle Iohn the last Penman of the Canon of the New Testament, Iesus Christ warneth all persons that heare the words of this Prophecy; If any man shall adde unto these things, God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in this Book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the Book of this Prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the Holy City, and from the things which are written in this Book, Rev. 22.18, [Page 310] 19. By which severe Commination, the integrity and divine Authority of this Book is asserted by Christ, against all whom Christ foresaw, would either indeavour to infringe the Authority of it, or corrupt the purity of it. Hereby then the whole divine Canon is sealed up, as fully now compleat, and divinely Authenticall, after which we are to expect no more Scripture from God.
5. The generall current of best Antiquity, except some few particular persons, and divers of them guilty of such heresies as this Book condemnes, hath embraced this Book, and accounted it of divine Authority. As those formerly cited, to prove Iohn the Apostle to be Penman of it, and many more that might be enumerated. As that ancient Ancyran Councel, held before the Nicene. in Append. as also the third Councell of Carthage, Can. 47. Cyprian frequently alledges the Revelation among the other Canonicall bookes, as De exhort. martyrum, c. 8. c. 11. c. 12. Testimon. Advers. Iudaeos l. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3.6, 11. &c.
6. The Cavils and Objections, against [Page 311] the divine Authority of this Book, reckoned up by Erasmus or others, how weak and unsatisfactory they are, may appeare in severall writers, who have confuted them. Especially vid. Bez. Prolegom. in Apocylaps. Ioannis. and Gerh. loc. Com. De scrip. sac. in exeges. cap. 10. Sect. 294. ad sin. cap.
Excellency of this Book is most considerable For,
1. The conveyance of it at first to the Church is singular. From God to Iesus Christ; From Iesus Christ to an Angel; From the Angel to Iohn, whom Jesus peculiarly loved above all his Apostles and Disciples, Rev. 1.1. And this to Iohn when in exile for Christ in the Isle Patmos; and that not on a common day▪ but on the Lords day, the Queen of dayes; and [...]o Iohn in Patmos, on the Lords day, not in an ordinary but extraordinary composure and elevation of his soule, when he was in the spirit, caught up (as it were) and transported in an holy extasie and spirituall Rapture, that he might the more attend to these mysteries revealed, and have more immediate un-interrupted Communion [Page 312] with Jesus Christ the Revealer, Rev. 1, 9, 10. &c. what can all this import, but some singularly eminent treasure for the Church in this book, whereby the Church in her deepest tribulation, may be (with Iohn) spiritually intransed and ravished with many surpassing grounds of joy, and consolation?
2. The stile is stately and sublime, and may wonderfully take the highest notion; The expressions quick, piercing and patheticall, and may pleasingly penetrate the dullest affection. The whole contexture is so full of divine majesty, that it commands an awfull Reverence in all gracious hearts that read it.
3. The matter of it is most heavenly and spirituall, and that in exceeding great variety, notably describing the Divinity of Christ, His offices and the benefits of them, clearly pointing out Anti-Christs Seate, Tyranny, Rise, Growth, Power, Acts and Fall, and most lively delineating the Churches condition, what it was in the Primitive times after Christ, and what it should be afterwards till the worlds end; how sad, [Page 313] yet s [...]fe under Anti-christs dominion; how sweet and happy after Anti-Christs destruction; how comfortable at the day of judgement; and how glorious in heaven with Iesus Christ for evermore. What Saint would not thirst much to read and here, more to understand, but most of all to enjoy these things? Some of them are laid downe most mystically in abstruse visions, to exercise the judgements of the wisest; some more familiarly to succour the infirmity even of the weakest. In some places the Lamb may wade, in others the Elephant may swim. Those prevent contempt, these anticipate discouragement. Ioao [...]imus Abbas prefers this Prophecy, before the Prophecy of all other Prophets. Beza saith, That those things in other Prophets, which were not fulfilled after Christs coming, the holy spirit hath heaped them all together in this precious book, and also added others so farre as was needfull or usefull for the Church to know them, Bez. Prolegom. in Apoc. Oecolampadius cals this book, The best Paraphrast of all the Prophets. Ioh. Oecolamp. Praefat. in Dani [...]l. Hierome [Page 314] saith, Apocalypsis tot habet sacramenta quot verba. Parum dixi, pro merito voluminis, laus omnis inferior est; in verbis singulis multiplices latent intelligentiae, i. e. The Revelation hath as many mysteries as words. Its but a little I say, all praise is too low for the merit of this volume; manifold understandings lie hid in every word. Hieron. in Epist. ad Paulin.
4. The Book it selfe is compleat, capable of no Addition or Detraction, but upon severest Penalties, Rev. 22.18.19.
5. The Penman Eminent, viz. John that beloved disciple, that sweet compound of love. It was Moses his honour who was Gods peculiar favourite, to be Penman of the first Book of the Old Testament. And it was Iohn's honour who was Christs peculiar favourite, to be Penman of the last Book of the New Testament; oh what divine love and favour is made known unto the Church, in all the volumes between the Armes of these two favourites!
6. Finally, God counts them blessed soules, that read, heare and keepe the words of this Prophecy. Blessed is [Page 315] he that readeth, and they that heare the words of this Prophecy, and keep these things that are written therein, Rev. 1.3. A blessed Book, that renders them blessed, who are practically versed in it.
The time when this Revelation was written, was when Iohn was banished into the Ile that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the Testimony of Iesus Christ, Rev. 1.9.10. Iohn was banished into Patmos, by that cruell persecutor Domitian, in the fourteenth yeare of his Reigne, saith Hieron. Catal. illustr. vir. in vit. Ioan. Domitian reigned in all but fifteen years, as Helvic. observes, and his fourteenth yeare was in the ninety fourth yeare after Christ, Helvic. in Chronol ▪ in the ninety sixth after Christ, saith Pareus Prolegom. in Apocal. c. 5. This Book is conceived to be written after all the Books of the New Testament.
Occasion of this Revelation seemes to be this. Iohn being banished into the Ile Patmos, Rev. 1.9, 10. doubtless gave himselfe to prayer, and sacred meditations about the affairs of Christ [Page 316] and his Church, whereupon Iesus Christ appeared to his beloved disciple, in a spirituall ravishment, showing him what was his pleasure, both touching the present Churches of Asia, and touching his whole Church to the end of the world; thus comforting him: and commanding Iohn to write his visions, for the comforting of them.
Scope of this book is,
Generally, To make knowne by Iohn unto the Churches both the things that then were, and that should be thereafter, Rev. 1.19.
Particularly. 1 To informe the Church of the many sharp conflicts she should have with Satan and his instruments, especially Hereticks, persecuting Tyrants, and Anti-Christ himselfe, that so she might not dream only of Halcyon dayes, but might prepare more and more for the worst of stormes ▪ 2 To discover and point out in lively Colours that grand Anti-christ, that the Church might run and read, and most infallibly know who he is. 3 As also to support and comfort the Church and all the faithfull, over all [Page 317] their tribulations, with the hopes of the utter overthrow of Anti-christ and all their enemies; of their owne joyfull triumphs over them; and of the happy condition which the Church shall afterwards enjoy, partly in this world, but chiefly in the world to come.
Though this book be most obscure and intricate, yet these things may somewhat facilitate the understanding of i [...], If we shall,
1. Keep the maine scope of the Book, still in our eye.
2. Compare the passages and phrases of the Revelation, with those of other Prophecies, as Rev. 11.4. with Zech. 4.3, 11, 14. Rev. 10.9, 10. with Ezek. 2.8. and 3.3. — Rev. 4.6, 7, 8. with Ezek. 1.5, 6, 7, 8. —Rev. 20.8. with Ezek. 18.2. and 39.1.—Rev. 21.15. with Ezek. 40.3. &c.
3. Parallel with this Prophecy, the subsequent Histories after Iohn's time, the Histories of the Roman Empire and Church, which testify clearly what cruelty and persecutions the Romane Emperours successively raised up against [Page 318] Christians: with what subtilty and fraud the B. of Rome did by degrees, (through the folly, cowardise, negligence, &c. of the Emperours,) step up into their throne, and subjugate not onely Rome, the Seate of the Empire, but also the whole Empire it selfe to his dominion and pleasure, whence we may derive not a little light, to see what is meant by the opening of the Seals. The Stars falling from heaven to earth. The beast speaking great and blasphemous things. The beast and false Prophet. The image of the beast. And the whore riding upon the beast with seven heads and ten hornes, and ruling in the city on the seven hils, &c.
4. Consider prudently the experience of later and present times; how accurately doth the description of the Beast and scarlet whore agree, to the Papacy? of the Locusts, to the Romane Clergy, and of the Frogs comming out of the mouth of the Dragon, the beast and the false Prophet, to the Iesuites and Romane Emissaries, compassing sea and land, and creeping into Kings palaces, to gather them together, to the warre of the great day of God almighty.
[Page 319]5. Finally, if we shall diligently read, meditate and pray, that the holy spirit, who revealed these things to Iohn, would reveale their sense and meaning to us, These things may help us to untie many knots, and render many difficulties easie.
Principall parts. In the Book of Revelation are chiefly considerable, 1 The Preface, 2 The Substance of the Book, and 3 The Conclusion.
The Preface, which is [...]. Generall, in I reference to the whole Prophecy, noting the Matter, Author, Penman, and Profit of this Book, c. 1. ver. 1, 2, 3. 2. Speciall or particular, in reference to the seven Churches of Asia Minor, and in them to the whole Catholick Church, figured by them, wherein are, 1. A Nomination of persons writing and written to. 2. The Salutation. 3. And a glorious Description of Jesus Christ, ver. 4. to 9.
The Substance or Body of this Propheticall II Book. c. 1. v. 9. to c. 22. v. 6. Wherein is contained a Narration of the State of the Church. I. Militant on earth. c. 1. v. 9. to c. 20. v. 11. II. Triumphant in heaven, c. 20. v. 11. to c. 22. v. 6.
The Condition of the Church Militant is declared 1. For present, what it was when [Page 320] Iohn wrote the Revelation, c. 1. v. 9. to c. 4. v. 1. 2. For future, what it should be till the judgement day. c. 4. v. 1. to c. 20. v. 11.
I. Uision.
I. Touching the State of the Church then present. viz. The Asian Churches principally; are laid downe two things, viz.
II. Touching the state of the Church for the future, especially the European Churches, This is insisted upon more largely and more mystically. Which in sum amounts to thus much, viz. To Pre-monish the Church of her great tribulations in this world, 1 By persecuting Tyrants, 2 Then by persecuting Hereticks, 3 At length by Anti-Christs most cruell Oppressions both corporall and spirituall. Against all which the holy-Ghos [...] intermingles many comforts to the Church, as that 1 God will be with her in all her distresses and not forsake her. 2 Her troubles shall not be endlesse, nor over-long. 3. Her enemies shall all of them at last be utterly destroyed. 4. The Church shall at last be set in a safe and happy condition in this world, but especially in the world to come. Now all these things are laid down visionally, in six other visions, remarkably distinct from one another, viz. II. Vision. c. 4, 5, 6, 7. III. Vision. c. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, IIII. Vision. c. 12, 13, [Page 322] 14. V. Vision. c. 15, 16. VI. Vision. c. 17, 18, 19. VII. Vision. c. 20, 21, 22. to v. 6. All which Visions seem to be comprized in two distinct Prophecies, or Systemes of Visions, parallel and contemporary to one another. Both revealing the mysteries for substance, but the later proceeding more punctually to particulars, as some are of opinion; Others rather think the former Prophecy comprehends the destinies of the Romane Empire, under seven Seals and seven Trumpets; The later Prophecy, the destinies of the Church, or of Christian Religion. The I. Prophecy beginning with the B. Sealed with 7. Seals c. 4. v. 1. ending c. 11. II. Prophecy, beginning c. 12. v. 1. (yet so as to take in some passages mentioned in the fifth Trumpet, as the Little book, the measuring of the Temple, the outer Court, the two Witnesses) continuing to the end of the Book. Now the sober considering, and wise comparing of these two distinct Prophecies with one another, may (as some think,) singularly serve to clear many difficulties throughout this Book,
II. Uision.
THE I. PROPHECY BEGINNETH.
The State of the Church future is revealed to JOHN, in a mysterious vision of A Book sealed with seven Seals, (All the particular mysteries in which Book, what man on earth can certainly and infallibly open, unlesse [Page 323] he had Iohn's Apocalypticall Key?) Here consider the
III. Uision.
VII. Seale opened. Here consider 1 Preparatories to it, 2 Mysterious Contents of it.
Here is annexed (by way of Preparatory Transition to the other three Trumpets,) John's vision of an Angel flying through the midst of heaven, denouncing three Woes by reason of the three last Trumpets, c. 8, 13.
I. Woe.
V. Trumpet sounded, where note 1. The Signe appearing, viz. A starre falling from heaven to earth. 2. The foure effects of this starre falling, viz. He opens the bottomlesse pit, Thence raiseth up smoake. Darkens Sunne and aire with the smoake, and brings Locusts unto the earth out of the smoake, which LOCUSTS are variously and notably described. 3. The Conclusion shutting up the Calamities of this Trumpet, and forewarning of them that follow, c. 9. 1. to 13.
II. Woe.
VI. Trumpet sounded, c. 9. v. 13. to the end of the chapter. Herein consider, 1. The Command to loose the foure Angels bound in Euphrates, v. 13, 14. 2. Execution of this command, v. 15. 3. The Description of the large Army of Euphratean Horses and Horsemen, v. 15, 16, 17. 4. The [Page 328] Calamitous effects wrought by them, v. 18, 19, 20, 21.
VII. Trumpet, Concerning which note. 1. Preparatories to it. 2. Sounding of it.
Thus the Second Woe is ended, and the third hastneth, v. 14.
III. Woe.
II. Sounding of the seventh Trumpet, wherein the Mystery of God is finished. And the Churches Miseries ended, c. [...] 1. v. 15. to the end of the chap. where consider, I. Things heard in heaven, viz. 1. Great voyces, saying▪ The Kingdomes of this world are become the Lords, and his Christs, &c. ver. 15. 2. The triumphant song or gratulation of the 24. Elders unto God, for honouring himselfe, and for the coming of his judgement to reward the Saints, and destroy the earth, ver. 16. 17, 18. II Things seene &c. In Gods Temple opened in heaven, viz. 1. The Saints Rewards, The Ark of his Testament, i. e. Jesus Christ. 2. The wickeds Rewards, Lightnings, voices, thundrings, earthquakes and great haile, ver. 19.
The former Prophecy endeth.
IV. Uision
THE II PROPHECY BEGINNETH.
Hitherto of the I. Prophecy, or Systeme of Visions, Denoting (as is thought by some) more especially the Condition of the last Empire viz. the Romane: Now to the II Prophecy or Systeme of Visions, (contemporary with the former both in the Seales and Trumpets) foretelling chiefly the future condition of the Church till the judgement day. Herein chiefly are set down, 1. The Tribulations and Persecutions of the Church by severall enemies. 2. The deliverance of the Church by her enemies destruction. 3. The happy condition of the Church, upon her deliverance. Though the common opinion of interpreters (who take not any notice of 2 contemporary Prophesies, and their Synchronismes, but judge these Visions to be one continued Prophecy,) bring all that followes under the seventh Trumpet, thus. viz. The sounding of the seventh Trumpet is propounded, I. Summarily, c. 11.15. to the end of the chap. II. Plenarily, and this either, 1. By way of Recognition and fuller explaining of the former Seales and Trumpets, in a digression, c. 12, 13, 14. 2. By way of Prediction of things future under the seventh Trumpet more largely, c. 15, 16, 17, &c. For substance these will come much to one. (But lets follow the former.)
[Page 331]I. The Persecutions of the Church by severall enemies greatly distressing her in this whole fourth Vision, c. 12. ver. 1. to c. 15. ver. 1. More particularly here note,
Viz. (as some thinke) with the Church of the Gentiles, where consider,
V. Uision.
II. The Deliverance of the Church, by the destruction of her enemies represented in the Vision of the 7. Vials full of the wrath of God, the 7. last plagues, poured out upon the eart [...] by 7. Angels, Here are, the
This pouring out of the VII. Vial, is laid down, 1. More Summarily, 2. More Plenarily.
I. More Summarily & compendiously c. 16. ver. 17. to the end of the chap.
VI Uision.
II. More plenarily and copiously, c. 17, 18, 19, & 20 to ver. 11. Wherin divers mysteries are most lively explicated, which formerly were heretofore more obscurely mentioned. Notably pointing out the [Page 333] Rise, Seate, Reigne, Vassals, Successe, and at last the fatall Ruine of Anti-christ and all the Churches enemies. So that this part affords no small light to the Prophetick part of the Revelation. Here consider, 1. The judgement of the great whore. 2. The event thereupon.
I. The judgement of the great whore c. 17, 18, 19. Where are,
VII. Or last Uision.
II. The event following after the judgement of the great Whore; which is chiefly three-fold,
Hitherto (as is conceived) hath been Revealed the future state of the Church as Militant on earth.
The condition of the Church as triumphant in heaven, is described both in respect of the 1. Inchoation ▪ and 2. Duration of it.
The Conclusion of this whole Prophecy; which III is either,
He that testifieth these things, saith; I come quickly. Amen. Even so, Come LORD JESUS.
Praemium est videre deum, vivere cum Deo, vivere de Deo; esse cum Deo esse, in Deo, quierit omnia in omnibus: habere Deum qui est Summum Bonum. Et ubi est summum bonum, ibi est summa felicitas, summa jucunditas, vera libe [...]tas, perfecta charitas, aeterna securitas, & secura aeternitas: ibi est vera laetitia, plena scientia, omnis plenitudo, & omnis Beatitudo.
Sic cum Deo homo Beatus erit, in cujus conscientia peccatum inventum non fuerit. Videbit Deum ad voluntatem, habebit ad voluptatem, fruetur ad jucunditatem. In aeternitate vigebit, in veritate fulgebit, in bonitate gaudebit.
[...].