Arrowes against Babylon. OR Certaine Quaeries serving to a cleere Discovery of the Mystery of Iniquity.
1 Quae: WHether Israells going into Aegypt their bondage there, and their deliverance, were not all typicall, to set forth the state of the Church and people of God under the New Testament?
And whether this hath not been by the tongues and pens of all parties of the godly in England, who have publickly contended for Reformation in Religion, of late yeares generally confessed, and asserted?
2. Whether the Church of Rome, and principally the head of that body, her Ecclesiasticall powers, the Pope, with his Cardinalls, Arch-Bishops, Bishops, &c. be not that Mysticall Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots; described in Rev: 17. who is said to be the Whore sitting upon many waters, commiting fornication with the Kings of the Earth, &c. Having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations &c. drunken with the blood of Saints and Martyrs of Jesus? And whether those Characters with others there layd downe by the blessed Spirit of God for our information,That the church of Rome is no true Church of Christ, have not divers Martyrs sealed it with their blood. Reade Acts and Mon. doe also fitly agree, and may be applyed to any Church or State whatsoever, as to the Church of Rome? And if the Church of Rome be Mysticall Babylon, then whether is shee any more worthy to be accounted Syon, or a true visible Church of God, then was Babylon of old her proper type?
3. Whether the Church of England (the Nation considered as a Church) with the Parochiall Congregations, as Churches, be [Page 2] not a Daughter of that Babylon, the Mother of Harlots? and their Ministry, in point of Ordination, the off-spring of the Pope? Have they at any time, even to this day, either by word in any solemne Declaration, or by practise in gathering a Church out of the Nation, as out of the world, disclaimed that Church-state which in its grossest corruption was avowed and maintained by the Popish Ministry and people of this Land in Queene Maries dayes? Is it not apparent that some new peices onely have been put to that old garment, that old Church state, yea whilst first the same, and since the like people without any visible Marks of Conversion, with their Romish Baptisme and Ordination of Ministry are still retained? And whether the aforesaid Characters in the second Quaery describing the Mother of Harlots the Church of Rome and her Ministry, doe not in like manner, in their measure, appeare upon her Daughter, the Nationall Church of England, and her Ministry?
If so, then
4. Whether is it not the duty of all Gods people in this Nationall Church, and in the Parochiall (pretended) Churches, to seperate from that false Church-state, and their professed Church worship, in all the exercises thereof; together with their Church-Ministry, as they stand and act on the account of office in that false Church? And whether the Commands of God to his people to come out of Babylon, Rev: 18. To flee out of the midst of her, Jer. 51. To depart thence and touch no uncleane thing, Isa: 52.11.Let such as [...] at the Word read and weigh those Scriptures quoted in this Quaery. be not a sufficient Scripture-warrant for their so doing? And whether Gods people neglecting to come out of Babylon, doe not thereby doe great disservice to the cause of Christ against Antichrist, and expose themselves by their disobedience in this thing, to the danger of receiving of her plagues, by pertaking of her sins? Rev: 18.4. v.
This Quaery with the two following may afford some help to discerne the times; and to resolve the [...] Question what is the work of the day?5. Whether the strange and wonderfull providences of God in the late Warrs in England, Ireland, and Scotland, have they not in their courses (not in one single act onely) agreed with his word, to cleere the call, and open the way, to his Saints to come out of Babylon? Hath not the Lord eminently appeared against King, Bishop, and Scotch-Presbyter, who refused to let Gods Israel goe free from the hard bondage of a forced Conformity to the Nationall Church-worship? And did not God (who put it into the heart of Cyrus, to give liberty to the Jewes to goe up to Jerusalem to build Gods house, Ezra 1.1.) put it also into the hearts of our [Page 3] Rulers, after great and signall successes given their Armies, to grant liberty to his people to walke according to their light without restraint and confinement to the Parish-Churches? And was not the hand of God strong upon them to vouchsafe that release from our bondage, notwithstanding the uncessant provocations of some to compell us to their way? If wee aske our Fathers can they shew us, our Elders, can they tell us of such a deliverance wrought out with so high a hand for Gods people in this Island?
6. Whether if wee look at inward impressions on the hearts of Gods praying people, (which when they agree with the word, and providences of God, are speciall helps whereby to judge of our dutie, and the season thereunto belonging) may we not observe how the hearts of Saints have, during the late warres,Let such as have lost their first zeale against Babylon, remember from whence they are fallen and repent. The people had a minde to the work, as in the dayes of Nehemiah, Neh 4.6. Such are more like the Children of Hagar the bond woman, then Sarah the free mother. Some are so filled with prejudice against Seperation, that they will not heare a word of it. Doe not such speak and thinke evill of the things they know not. Is it because they have no need of this. Ordinance? or because they have not living enough to bury their dead? Are not many theeves, murderers, adulterers, such as are publickly convicted of such offences, harboured in the parochiall Churches without any Church censure upon them? And if this be so, there is little cause why they should blame those who leave such a company of corrupt men. O horrible hypocrisie! Do not some Parish-Ministers act as if they were willing to slide out of their old way, not fai ely taking their leave, taking to themselves the shame of their abominations. Let such as speake against Babylon, take heed that they doe it in a right spirit. Rev. 18.6. Jer. 15.14. Shall not the steps of the poore [...] downe the lofty City Isa 36.6. Even the steps of those who walke by the footsteps of the flock? been stirred up to a great zeale against the whore of Babylon? Hath not God cast that false Church state and worship, roote, and branch, out of the hearts and affections of very many of his people, who being dead to mens traditions, minde a pure way of worship, cleerely discovering to them the confusions and corruptions of that way, causing them to protest against it, and forsake it, though to the hazard of their credit and profit, suffering great opposition on that account from their neere relations? Have not few yeares brought out of that way many thousands in this Land, who have turned their back to Babylon with their faces towards Syon, enquiring the way thitherward? And of those who remaine behind, are not many held back by worldly interests, and slavish feare of man? The more ingenious of them blush to affirme (being driven to it in defence of their staying there) that their Congregations are true Churches, either in respect of matter, or forme, yet some there are who are so affrighted with feare of errour, that they are not free to enquire after the truth in this thing.
7. Whether the zealous and tedious labours of the Parliament and Synod for reforming of the Nationall Church-Discipline, hath not proved like the washing of a Blackmore, and answer not to that saying Wee would have healed Babylon, but shee is not healed? What followes, as the Saints duty then but to forsake her? Are not the people in their Parish-Congregations so incorrigible, that their Physitians despaire of the cure? In stead of cutting off the corrupt part, have they not even rejected (for some yeares) that Ordinance of Excommunication which serves to keepe a true Church pure? If one wicked person must be cast out with his wickednesse, [Page 4] least a little Leaven might leaven the whole lumpe may wee not thinke their lump is long since leavened who have in their Congregations so long retained, as members, without rejection, so great swarmes of prophane ones? Is not their Nationall Church (if wee denominate them ought with respect to the greater number) rather a Cage of uncleane birds, and a hold of every soule spirit, then a true visible Church of God, a spirituall house consisting of lively Stones? Some indeed exclude the rude rabble from partaking in the Supper, which is but one act of Church-worship; but, Doe not many professing to be Ministers of their Churches, make large shew of zeale for Ordinances, as if they strained at a gnat, and yet in this thing easily swallow downe a Camell, taking no notice in any way of practise, of so great an Ordinance, which being duely practised by a true Church, tends to the destruction of the flesh, and the saving of the soule in the day of the Lord, 1 Cor: 5.8? If men take not to themselves the shame of these their abominations in the matter of worship, what grounds have they, or their followers, to beleive, that God will shew them the patterne of his house, the goings out, and commings in thereof, &c. Ezek. 43.11.
And if these things be so,
8. Whether then the Saints and servants of God ought not to declare the Nationall-Church of England, (viz. the Nation pretending to be a Church) to be indeed no Church of Christ, but a Daughter of Babylon? And is it not their duty to discover her abominations, in such Language (in speaking of Babylon, either the Mother or her Daughter) as the Spirit of God makes use of, and commends to us in the holy Scriptures? Doth not that command to Gods people, to reward her as shee hath rewarded them, extend to a full reward, both in words, and deeds? And if through flatteries of men, slavish feare, or foolish pitty, Gods Archers (his Ministers) withhold to shoote such arrowes against Babylon in preaching, or printing, as God hath put into their Quiver for that purpose, may they not be justly rebuked for it?
9. Whether a bare forsaking of the Nationall Church, and a verball declaring against it, be a sufficient witnesse-bearing for Christ, against Antichrist, in the matter of Worship? or whether besides all this, are not Gods people called by a bold profession, and visible practise of the ordinances of Christ, according to the Gospel pattern, to hold forth a true Baptisme, & Church-worship, [Page 5] and so by a contrary practise, to beare their testimony in the strength of Gods Spirit, and truth, against that false way? And in so doing, though the worke of Zions building, may appeare, now in its beginning, as nothing, in comparison of that glorious patterne in the Apostles dayes, is there not ground to beleive God will vouchsafe his presence and helpe to his people in the work, according to his good word, Haggai 2. 1, 2, 3? And when the Saints come out of Babylon, ought they not then to call upon one another, to flow to Zion, and there to declare the worke of the Lord? Jer. 1.6.9, 10. And if this be the season for the former duty, why not for the latter and having with, and amongst them, the Word, and Spirit, according to that stable Covenant to beleivers in all generations, Isa. 9.21.Neh. 2.18. What hinders but they should rise and build?
10. Whether many zealous Ministers and people in the Parish-way, by reason of their ignorance of the times, and seasons, and the great worke of God at this day, to bring his people out of Mysticall Babylon; may they not be in danger of fighting against God, and kicking against the pricks; as did many devout Jewes, who were zealous of the old legall Worship, not knowing or considering that the time of reformation from Jewish rudiments,Heb 9.10. was come? And, doe not many now as they then, little consider Gods call to his people to reforme thorowly from all Antichristian pollutions, and to touch no uncleane thing, in this day of the Lords controversie for Sion? And may wee not see, as then, so now, the things which God winked at in times of ignorance, hee will not winke at, but witnesse against in times of light? And is there not a very great security upon many professors,Can yee not discerne the signes of the times? Mat. 16.3. and darknesse upon their right eye, that notwithstanding all the signes of the times, and all the late wonderfull workes of God, they are not awakened to discerne, and doe the speciall duties, which God by his strange dispensations calls them to? And is it not apparent, that many who should instruct others in the duty of the day,It is the duty of the wise Steward to give the Children of God the portion of Doctrine sutable to the season. Luk. 12 42. doe discourage them from enquiring into such things, telling them of the danger of mistakes, and the great difficultie of finding out truth, referring them in many things to the footesteps of the flock in times of Popish darknesse? But is it not high time for Gods people to goe a step beyond such Watch-men, enquiring after Christ in the further discovery of truth? And seeing God hath chosen the weake and foolish things of the world to confound the wise, ought not even such [Page 6] to search into the booke of revelation, seeking God by faithfull fervent prayer, for his promised Spirit to lead them into all truth, remembring the words of David, Thou through thy precepts hast made me wiser then mine enemies, I have more understanding then all my teachers, Psal. 119.98, 99.
11. Whether the Parish-Ministry in their standing, and acting, as such, are not found taking part with Babylon, and warring against the true visible Churches of Christ, and all others who withdraw from and witnesse against the Common polluted way of worship? And if so, whether those who are enlightened, may warrantably upon the account of the gifts and godlinesse of such Teachers follow after them, so as to have fellowship with them in their broad Church-way? And is it not to make Idolls of them, and preferre them before Christ, and set them above him, if they choose rather to follow after such Ministers in that way which hath no word of God for it, then to follow Christ in that despised way of worship, which hath the sure word of Scripture for its warrant?Mark how Satan makes use of Eminent instruments sometimes, to promote his wicked Designes. If Peter that eminent Preacher, might be, and was so farre captivated by the Tempter, as to oppose by rebuking Jesus Christ himselfe, when he spake of his suffering death, Mat: 16 21, 22, 23. And againe denied him shamefully when he came to suffer, with cursing and oathes, saying he never knew the man; And after all this at another time the same Peter who was so famous an instrument in Gods hand for converting so many soules, even he becomes a misleader in a way of dissimulation, Gal: 2.11, 12, 13, 14. so that Barnabas an eminent Minister of Christ,If some who see such dissembling tell them that dissemble, that they are to be blamed, they do but as Paul did who told Peter of his fault. Gal. 2.14. and divers others were carried away with his dissimulation. If so it were with Peter, is there not ground enough for the good people in that way to feare, that their Ministers, even the choicest of them, may be fallen into temptation, to be prejudic't against the worke of a thorow-reformation, seeing their preferments, livings, and honours seeme to be struck at; and so being offended, labour to draw in others to be one with them, in their offence and opposition against the Saints in their present warfare for Christ against Antichrist?
12. Whether the greater number of people in the Parish-Assemblyes, are not in danger of eternall Damnation, through their high presumption that they are in Christ, and in a good estate? And whether have not Englands Church-Ministry much to answer for, who have begotten, and cherished this confidence in them, by declaring them in their old Catechisme, To be regenerate [Page 7] in their Baptisme, made Members of Christ, and inheritors of the kingdome of Heaven? If this be true, and no lye they have taught them who thus exalted them unto heaven, may they not boldly conclude from many promises to beleevers, that their soules are in a safe condition? But it may now be said, they have laid by that Catechisme, and now they preach to them a necessitie of regeneration; But seeing they have been trained up from their infancy in this beleife, which they have by heart, as wee say, that they were regenerate in their Baptisme long wnce; Is it probable that the old evill sent which hath remained in the vessell, for so many yeares, will be removed by telling them now, and then, they must be borne againe? Although many declare this to them in the Pulpit, and so wound them a little for the present time, yet doe they not quickly heale them againe at the Font, or Bason,Is not this to justifie the wicked? that evill condemned Prov. 24.24. accepting them there for beleevers, by administring that to the children of all or most of them, that which they declare to be the priviledge of the Children of godly beleeving Parents? Doth not this easily help them to conclude, that whatsoever they say in preaching, their Ministers by their practise declare them to be beleevers? And have their Ministers notwithstanding so much talke of reformation, at any time, plainely, solemnly, and openly declared their repentance for this their sin, or the sin of their predecessors in this thing, whereby they have deluded thousands of soules? Have they declared it so, that the common people might run, and read their meaning? should not the playster be made as broad as the soare?
If so then
13. Would it not be a praise-worthy deed, and that which would much tend to free the present Parish-Ministry from being guilty of the blood of their people, for them to confesse openly, the great sin of their predecessors, and their sin, so far as they have partaken with them, in declaring the people to be borne againe in Baptisme, and made inheritors of the kingdome of heaven, discovering the danger of this horrid delusion, giving them plainly to understand, that they, the generality among them, who say they are Christians, are not such, but are of the world, as appeares by their hatred of those whom God hath chosen out of the world? And should they not doe well to informe the godly among them, that they are in no visible orderly Church-state, provoking them to arise and measure the patterne, and sending them forth by the footsteps of the flocks in the primitive times? and would it not well [Page 8] become them having thus borne their testimony in word against the aforesaid evill, to back the same in their practise with a plaine deniall to administer any Ordinance of Christ to the common multitude, more then such as are for conversion, which belong to Heathen and Publicans,Luk. 6.44. till they see them bring forth fruits meet for repentance,Good and bad men must be knowne by their fruit. Luk 6.44. The Parish people are a people of mans forming by such meanes. whereby a man may probably know, and warrantably judge them to be converted and brought to the most holy faith of Christ? And as for their present profession taught them by the tradition of fathers, and by the customes and precepts of men, not by the mighty power of God through the Word, what solid satisfaction can it administer whereon to ground a probable judgement that they are in the faith, Considering that in this Land, there is now no persecution as in the Apostles dayes, but on the contrary, many worldly advantages attending the common profession of Christ? And except some such effectuall course be taken, as is before commended in this Quaery, can the Ministers of such a people by all their faire glosses and subtill arguings acquitt themselves from the blood of soules? Is it not their duty to take up the stumbling blocks out of the way of their people? Are not many thousands of poore ignorant soules, by looking at such things as these, their supposed Christning, and Church-state, together with their dead saith, hindered from receiving Christ, and strongly armed against the sight and sence of a lost estate, to their eternall undoing? Shall God make inquisition for the blood of mens bodies, and shall he not one day make inquisition for the blood of soules, and require it of those who have holpen them to, and strengthened them in such delusions?
Woe to them that call evill good. Isay 5.20. If that old saying, Quod fieri non debet factum valet, will justifie such an unlawfull act, why may it not justifie any other act of will-worship when it is done?14. And if so,
Whether the Ministry and people in some Congregations seperated from the Parish way, may not doe well to consider, whether they be not found accessary to the aforesaid great transgression of the Parochiall Ministry, in justifying the sprinckling of ungodly prophane and Popish Parents Children, as a sufficient obedience to Christs command of Baptisme, doctrinally discharging from the obligation of that command the consciences of such of their Members as have no other visible Baptisme? Is not this to call evill good, will-worship service to Christ, and by mans tradition to make a command of God of none effect? Doe they not by such a practise, though themselves refuse to sprinckle such Children, yet strengthen the hands of those who doe? And whether this be [Page 9] not more then a touching, even the retaining an unclean thing, forbidden to those who come out of Babylon, the command requiring to destroy her utterly, Let nothing of her be left, Jer. 50.26. Whilest this unlawfull sprinckling of the seed of the ungodly is thus set up, may it not stand in their way as an obstruction to the sight and acknowledgement of the truth, concerning the true visible Baptisme?Can it be true Baptisme according to rule without a right visible subject? And whether all their arguing to prove that sprinckling before spoken of (which themselves say hath not warrant for it) to be sufficient obedience to the command, be not that which will be found wood, hay, and stubble, when every mans worke shall be tryed by fire?
15. Whether the unwarrantable mixture of Legall and Gospel-worship and worshippers, accounting this Nation a Church after the likenesse of the Jewish Nation, not by regeneration,Antichrists device to forme a false Church. but by fleshly generation, gathering together into a pretended Church-body the visibly Godly with the ungodly, withall promoting againe tythes, offerings, consecrated places, Altars, with many other such like Jewish Ceremonies, which were typicall,The Priesthood being changed, there is made of necessitie a charge also of the Law. Heb. 7.12. and to cease in Gospel-dayes; the joyning with all these a shew of the Ordinance of breaking bread, and Baptisme? Whether, (I say) may not such a mixt worship, and the worshippers be fitly termed Babylon, or confusion? And whether to establish such a worship be not to deny in a Mystery (as doth Antichrist, Christs greatest professed friend) that Christ,1 Joh. 4.3. the substance of the Legall shaddowes is come in the flesh?See Quae: the third. And whether the pretended reformed Church of England retaining the old Romish Church-state, and confused mixtures, maintaining the same things in substance with them, be not to be esteemed as a painted Jezebel?
16. Whether the Mystery of iniquity which wrought in Pauls time, were not the same which now workes in the Church of Rome, and her Daughter-Churches? Did it not then worke mainely, to bring the Saints back under the bondage of Moses his killing doctrine; and his rudiments, and shaddowes? And whether the Apostle as a faithfull Witnesse and Watchman did not bend his doctrines and discourses in his Epistles, especially to the Romans, Corinthians, and Galatians, against this way of confounding the grace of God with mans works in justification, and confounding Moses his old Lawes with Christs New Testament Ordinances? The same mystery being at worke now, not onely in Rome, but in this Nationall Church, Is it not the duty of Gods faithfull Ministers, and Watchmen [Page 10] to warre against it, by preaching, and discourse, with the sharp sword of Christs Word, warning Gods people to beware of being seduced with this iniquity, which being discovered in many things more grosse putts on a new dresse and works most mysteriously, so that the workmen say, who seeth us? Isa. 29.15.
The mystery of [...] is now [...] with a [...].17. Whether the Mystery of iniquity that now workes be not founded upon the will of man, confederate with Satan? And is it not promoted, and upheld by humane and Serpentine wisdome, with worldly power and pollicy, opposing and counter-working the Gospel-graces of God, and Spirit of Christ, exalting the creature above the Creator? And whether the Abettors and promoters of this Mystery, may not be discovered and discerned in our dayes, by their prizing men much more for their naturall, and acquired parts and abilities, then for the anointing, looking more at a mans learning, and prudence, then at the teachings of the Spirit, minding excellency of speech more then the power of godlinesse, seeking more after their owne honour from men, then to bring honour and glory to God?
18. If so then,
May wee not well expect that God who hath laid by so many instruments, whose designe is to exalt his owne grace, his Son, and Spirit, will choose and use most unlikely instruments in mens account, as the weake and foolish, in respect of worldly wisdome, even the younger brethren, even as David amongst the sons of Jesse, spiriting them through faith and prayer to bring to passe those things which by humane power and pollicy could not be effected? Whether then are not many (and some good men) like to be deceived, who looke as did Samuel on Eliah, on some wise, expert, prudent men to be the onely prime instruments for Gods great and strange worke,1 Cor. 1.26, 27, 28. which will not be done by power or might, but by the Spirit of God? Zach: 4.6.
19. Whether the faith and prayers of Gods people were not once as the Chariot-wheeles to the great worke of God in this Nation, but now of late since our enemies have been subdued, have not many good men slacked their hands to those duties, and by looking and leaning to mans wisdome, power and pollicy, turned aside to crooked wayes, and so have lost the footsteps of the Lord in his worke? And whether can they come to a cleere sight of them againe, except they humble themselves and returne to a diligent exercise of faith and prayer? And if they will not be otherwise [Page 11] provoked thereunto, may it not be just for God to reduce them unto sore straites, that so they may learne to seeke him early? Hos. 5.15.
20. Whether the continuance of divers godly men in Babylon, and pertaking with her, be not one great occasion of stumbling many weake Christians, with some other enquirers after truth? And ought not such then in the feare of God, to consider and examine their standing, and to lay to heart how great service they doe to Antichrist, and disservice to Christ, and his cause? And doth not the deceiver suck no small advantage from godly men serving his designe which puts a faire face thereon, though they doe it ignorantly or inconsiderately? May we not observe that since godlinesse is in some request, Satan puts on such a dresse as may most take with the godly to seduce them? And if these should flee out of Babylon, would shee not soone appeare to all good men to be what shee is, and the judgements of God would they not come suddainly upon her, as did the fire and brimstone upon Sodome the day that Lot came out? Whether that which hinders many from comming out, be not a slavish feare of man, and the flattery and friendship of this world? Whether such onely will not be found fit to follow the Lambe even whither soever he goeth, who first sit downe and count the cost, and so build the Tower of their profession upon Gods grace alone, as held out in his Covenant, trusting him with all their concernments? If they onely are said to overcome who loved not their lives unto the death, as Revel. 12. What becomes of all the other professors,Remember the hand of God against the rebellious Scots at Dunbar. the fearefull and unbeleeving, &c? If Gods servants shall abide there, notwithstanding all the warnings they have had, and all Gods patience towards them, may he not justly slay them with the wicked, though he save their soules at the last?
21. Whether the Antichristian Ministry in the Nations, which derive their Church-state from Rome, are not found committing fornication with the Kings of the earth?No Bishop, No King. And whether this fornication be not by interweaving their interests, for the upholding one another: thus by flatteries and by force bringing the people and keeping them in bondage to their wills, enslaving their bodyes and insnaring their soules?
22. Whether seeing the greatest judgements belong to Babylon, may not God in justice to aggravate their sins who receive not the love of truth, lend them so much light as that many of them [Page 12] shall be found willfull Apostates, after all their other persecutions, at length persecuting the Spirit of Christ, so bringing upon themselves swift destruction? Are not many found persecuting that light which they once profest? Is not that word made good in them, They shall goe and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken? and if it be so, is it not high time to bid them take heede, lest they sin willfully after they have received the knowledge of the truth?
23. Whether by that sure rule of justice that all the blood from Abel should come upon the persecuting generation in Christs time, Math. 23.34, 35. And that in the Revel: 18.24. that in Babylon was found the blood of all the Saints shed from the foundation of the earth; Doth there not lye a heavy load of blood-guilt upon the Antichristian faction, who strike in with that deadly interest at the latter end of the day, to act their part against Christ and his Cause? Should not all men take heede how they touch or take part with that interest, least they come under the guilt of all the former bloody persecutions of Gods Saints? Whether are not the opposite interests of flesh and Spirit now at warre, the same interests which were at variance in Cain and Abell, the seeds being the same two as formerly, though brought forth in severall ages, though the controversie betwixt them not alwayes upon the same part or point of truth or errour.