A CASE OF Great and Present Vse.

Whether we may lawfully hear the now Conforming Mini­sters, who are re-ordained, and have renounced the Co­venant, and some of them supposed to be scandalous in their Lives?

Considered, and Affirma­tively resolved.

By a late Eminent Congregational Divine.

London, Printed, for Jonathan Robin­son, at the Golden-Lyon in St. Pauls Church-yard. 1677.

The Case. Whether we may Lawfully hear the now Conforming Ministers, who are Re-ordained, and have Renounced the Covenant, and some of them sup­posed to be Scandalous in their lives?

Answer.

FOr the resolution of this Case, there is a threefold Consideration perti­nent.

Consideration I.

About the Duty it self, Hearing the Word.

There are four ways by which at this day the great God conveyeth the Knowledg of himself and his Mind unto sinful Man: 1. His works of Creation and Providence: Psal. 19.2. 2. The suggest of Conscience, even the remainder of God's Image in us. [Page 2]3. The word or Law of God Written, Ex­pounded or applyed in ordinary Preaching. 4. The Church, which is the Ground and Pillar of Truth, the Knowledg of God and his Mind is more especially there held forth, by the gifts given, and Offices therein ap­pointed by Christ. These are distinct ways and methods of God, by which he is pleased to make known himself: and we are obliged even by the Law of Nature to attend when God doth speak; it is therefore an undoubted moral Duty, to attend the speaking of God in whatsoever way by Providence brought unto us.

The Scripture with the Interpretation and Application thereof, commonly termed Prophesying or Preaching, is one of the fore-mentioned means by which God makes known himself to us, this is a National gift according as God in his Providence shall dispose: Psal. 147.19, 20.

Such National or Publick Preachers may be said to have their Call from Christ, he having a hand in ordering the motions of Providence for the good of his Church: John 5.17. And particularly in this provi­dential sending of Ministers, Mat. 9.38. and this is the calling and sending mentio­ned, Rom. 10.15. The Lord in these ad­ministrations, by Preachers thus sent, accor­ding [Page 3]to the good Pleasure of his Will finds out a People before they seek him. This is a dis­pensation of God to Men as his Creatures.

For Application to the Case.

The Word of God interpreted and ap­ply'd by preaching in this providential way, is a choice Mercy and Gift, wherewith God hath blessed this Nation for many years, to the Conversion and Edification of many thousands. The Governors thereof have successively according to their Light made divers good Laws and Statutes for Im­proving this Mercy for the best advantage of the Nation, as appears in that,

1. There are Schools and Universities maintained for the bringing up of Persons in Learning; also there is a constant setled maintenance for incouraging of such as shall be sent out to the several parts of the Nati­on in this great work.

2. There is a sum of Doctrinal Truths, which in the enlargement and application, are sufficient both for Conversion and Edi­fication, which the Preachers are to assent; and there is provision made by our Laws that such persons only who are sound in the Faith be imployed therein.

3. The Inhabitants of this Nation, are required to be present, and to give atten­dance [Page 4]to Instruction, that they may Learn the Fear of the Lord.

Assertion.

These things being so, although some of us do enjoy the Instruction of our Pastors being in a Church relation, yet it is a duty that we and our Families frequent also, (as we have Liberty and Opportunity, the more Publick and National Ministry) for these Reasons.

Reason 1.

Where the Lord hath appointed various ways and methods, in which he will draw near to us, and manifest himself, we ought to make use of all in their place and season. This is a several and distinct way or ap­pointment of God, not only in respect of Gods works and our Consciences; but also in respect of the teachings of Church Officers, as appears in these particulars.

1. The one is Cultus Naturalis, from the first Commandment, directed by the Light of Nature; and the other is Cultus In­stitutus, a duty of the second Command­ment, and our direction herein is onely from Gospel Light.

2. In respect of the Persons that are the primary Object of each. Prophesying, that is, Church Preaching, serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe; [Page 5]It is principally for building: for a Church State supposeth them Believers; though such preaching hath occasionally its efficacy is converting weak, and more directly in re­lation to the Children of Members. This National or Providencial preaching, is prin­cipally for Conversion, and hath for its primary and main object, persons in their natural condition; such a Preacher was Noah, 2 Pet. 2.5.1 Pet 4.6. Mat 16.3. Preaching is before believing, and believing before any Church Ordinance: There were Preachers in all Nations, and in every City, before there were Churches in every City.

3. The one is from Gifts only as necessa­rily requisite, but Church Instruction suppo­seth the person to be not only of some emi­nency in Gifts, but Grace also, and set apart to office according to Christs appointment.

And now having seen the difference of these two methods, the Consequence will follow; they ought to be attended with due reverence each of them.

Reason 2.

As we are Members of Churches, so we are Subjects and Members of this Common-Wealth, and are obliged thereby to observe the lawful command of our Governors, and to be examples therein to others. As mem­bers also of this Civil body, we ought to [Page 6]Joyn with it in a thankful acknowledging this happy Providence of God, by which we and our Children after us maybe in­structed, which may be a means to have it continued, and a neglect thereof would give just cause to fear the contrary.

Reason 3.

If Church Members, or any one Godly Man hath a Warrant to forbear hearing such Mi­nisters upon this account of unlawfulness, then all Godly men ought at all times so to do; and if so, the Examples of the Godly to the generality being very leading in the matters of God, this Ordinance thereby will be little frequented, and of less effica­cy to those that do come to it. And by as­serting it unlawful to hear such Ministers, we imply, it were better for the Nation there were no preaching but in particular Churches; and if so, what can we expect will become of many thousands in an ordi­nary way of Salvation that have no bene­fit at all by our Church-Instructions? We are to walk wisely, yea, mercifully towards them that are without.

Objections Answered.

Object. 1.

Where there is no true Church, there can be no true Ministry: the Church of England is no true Church, Ergo, &c.

Answer.

There may be a Lawful and True Mini­stry, or Administration of the saving truths of God, though the Nation, or any parcels of it as yet be in no Church-State. We say each particular Church materially conside­red, is part of the Church Catholick. The matter must needs have being before the form can be introduced. No Man becomes a Member of the Catholick Church but by his effectual calling, and that is by preach­ing the Word. I conclude therefore each particular Church to have its production from such an Administration, and not this Ministry to have its original or state from the Church.

Object. 2.

The National Ministry is Antichristian, de­rived from Rome.

Answer.

If Antichristian, its either so from their Standing, as deriving their Ordination thence, (of which in the third Consideration,) or from their Doctrine: if any such doctrine be preached, it's the miscarriage of particu­lar persons, and contrary to the National provision. The Articles of Religion, to which the Ministers are to conform their Instructions, are Orthodox, and framed for the casting and keeping out of Popery.

Object. 3.

It offends our weak Brethren; it is a com­plying with the Corruption of the times, its an approbation and incouragement to Con­formity.

Answer.

These, and other Objections of the like nature, have their weight and place in pra­ctice when the matter is indifferent, and may be done or left undone without Sin, and not in relation to any moral duty. Though I know gathering of Churches in a Congregational way, preaching without Ordination, Baptizing of Infants and the like, as well as hearing a conforming-Mi­nister, are a great offence to some that are truly Godly: yet may I not say, If such a Fellowship, if such baptizing, and the rest, offend my Brother, I will do no such thing while the World, standeth lest I should offend. It were sin so to resolve, because these are moral duties, and not left to my liberty, as Meats and the rest, 1 Cor. 8.13. and Act. 8. wherein the nature of indifferent things is laid down.

Consideration II.

About refraining a Moral duty for the evil mixed with it, or in the persons per­forming it.

1. As we are not to do evil that good may [Page 9]come of it, no more ought we to leave what is morally good undone for the evil that is some way mixed with it. Zeal for good is to be preferred to that which is a­gainst evil. The greatest good is better than the greatest evil is bad. Whatever good thing we do, tends towards our Union with the chiefest Good, the refraining of evil not so immediately.

2. Betwixt things indifferent, and what is morally good, you have this difference. If there be any mixture of evil with the one, it becomes wholly evil, there is nothing of good in it to give stop or preponderate; but what is morally good will remain so still, though mixed with evil. We may allay the worth of it, as baser Metals mixed with Gold, but yet it is Gold still, and may be perfectly severed.

3. When I would do good, saith the Apo­stle, evil is present with me. I cannot hear, or read, or pray, and the rest, but with a mixture of Sin, yet upon this account I may not cease from, or neglect a known du­ty, not though materially considered the evil accompanying being greater than the good; as in meditation, when blasphe­mous thoughts arise, &c. To omit a known duty is a sin of wilfulness, the evil from me in it is but infirmity only; The least wilful [Page 10]sin is greater and more provoking than the greatest Sin of Infirmity.

For application to the case.

1. Governors otherwise pious and zea­lous, yet not so knowing in matters of Church orders, may possibly in the discharg­ing of their duty, and doing this good work, occasion a mixture of evil with it; Being perswaded that Preachers and Preaching, will be accepted with more reverence, and become more effectual▪ if by persons ordain­ed as well as examined and tryed, for their fitness, and if accompanied also with Set and Solemn Formes of Prayer and other Ʋni­formities, they therefore by their Laws establish and enjoyn these things. The persons also appointed to this work (though not approving all that is imposed) through infirmity yeild and submit, rather than let so good a Work fall.

2. The things therefore objected as evils, by which some are deterred from hearing, are the infirmities of other men mixed with the duty; I say infirmities, for so in Charity we ought to judg. Now if I may not omit a duty in respect to the evil mixed with it, which is my own, much less may I thus leave an Ordinance for the evil that is ano­ther mans, no way mine, or to be charged upon me. This were to make another [Page 11]mans sins or infirmities more mine than my own.

Objections Answered.

Object, 1.

We cannot judg such imposition, and sub­mitting to them, infirmities, especially after so much Light and Reformation.

Answ. 1.

If the known Integrity and Piety of some of them who have Conformed is such, that there is ground to hope what they have done herein is through want of Light, mis­apprehension or the like Infirmity, we may then conclude that the grossness, wilfulness, or whatsoever may make those actions more than an Infirmity in any other Confor­mist, must arise only from the internal frame or badness of the mind and intenti­ons, for externally they are the same. If so, then it is nothing at all to us; to them it is, Prov. 21.27. for in respect of the law­fulness of our joyning with the administra­tion, or unlawfulness, whether it be done with a better or worse mind, is not obser­vable by us; outward and visible fins only pollute others that be in relation. If Envy, Pride, Hypocrisie, or the like evils of the mind did so, we mould be constantly guil­ty of other mens Sins, and without remedy.

Answ. 2.

Whatever Sins are in the person as to himself, they are to me but as Sins of In­firmity, that is, such evils adhering to the worship as I have no power to prevent, I may and ought to mourn for such mixtures, as for my own infirmities, but avoid them I cannot without I avoid the duty.

Object. 2.

There is much Error mixed with the few Truths they Preach, as Popery, Arminianism, &c There are also invective reflections, yea railings against the People of God.

Answ. 1.

What is morally good will bear the mix­ture of a great deal of evil, and yet retain its goodness still: the goodness being from God, who is a greater good than Satan, or Sin, is an evil.

Answ. 2.

We cannot expect from men of ordinary gifts that Truth be preached without the mixture of Errors more or less: We know but in part, therefore are to prove all things, and hold fast that which it good, Heb. 5.14. A Saint, as other Creatures, though weak and newly born, hath a raft of what is Food suitable, and what sincere.

Answ, 3.

As for those intemperate expressions and [Page 13]reflections oh the People of God, I confess it is sad, but were there not such against Paul and his Party? Phil. 1.15. yet not­withstanding they are to be heard even by the same persons they enveighed against for the Truths sake.

Object. 3.

The lives of most of our Conformists are vile and abominable, full of Pride, Covetous­ness, Luxury, Drunkenness: how can we expect a Blessing on their Labours, though they preach truth and good Things?

Answ. 1.

The mixtures in Sermons are nearest, the irregularities of their calling the next; the Sins, of their Conversions farthest from their Doctrine, and therefore have less efficacy at such a distance to prejudice it.

Answ. 2.

Its God's Word, and not their own, they Preach. Truth is blessed from the Lord for its own sake, and his whose it is. When Christ blessed his Disciples with the pro­mise of his presence, Mat. 28.20. Lo I am with you always, even to the end of the World, it is to be applyed rather to their Doctrine then Persons, for they were some­times left to humane Infirmities in their lives, and they lived not, to the end of the World. If it be not Truth, though an Angel [Page 14]from Heaven bring it, no blessing will come with it; but if it be Christ that is preached, whoever is the instrument, there is matter of hope and rejoycing, Phil. 1.15, &c. Some preached Christ who were not sincere, though at the same time others who were blameless preached the same Truths. What then? saith Paul, vers. 18. Notwithstanding, every way Christ is preached, and therein do I rejoyce, and will rejoyce. Those Peter mentions they fed the Flock, the Flock then heard them, and were instructed by them: yet we are told those Ministers were Covetous, Ambitious, took up their Ministry for filty Lucres sake; And were Lords over Gods Heritage, More cannot be objected against our Ministers that Conform, than might against the Scribes and Pharisees in Christs time; either in respect of their Doctrine, which was loaden with Traditi­ons; their Standing, which Was not accord­ing to Law, their lives, which were Vitious: yet Christ not only permits, but requires us to attend the Truths they deliver.

Consideration III.

About partaking with another mans sins.

This ariseth from some special relation, as a moral touch: which is either in respect to the person transgressing, or the Sin it self.

1. Out Relation to persons, may either be [Page 15]1. Transient, or Occasional. For a man be­comes guilty with him that sinneth, by ap­plauding, approving, or incouraging him in his Sin; Joh. 2.10, 11. Rom. 1.32. and in some cases by silence, being present when some gross Sin is openly committed. Or 2. Our Relation may be set and stated; either Civil, as between Parents and Chil­dren, Masters and Servants, &c. This will not be much to our purpose: or Sa­cred, viz. that Setled Relation that ariseth from Gospel-Communion, as in particular Churches between Officers and Members, and one Member with another. By vertue of this Relation, Sins are transmitted from one to another with the greatest celerity and efficacy; A little Leaven leaveneth the whole Lump.

The evil of another, and that duty we joyn in, may so relate, as I may partake of his e­vil, though I act nothing with him but what is a Duty on my part. Receiving of Rents and Tenantship are so neerly related, that if the person with whom I partake thus, have forfeited his Tenant-ship, and of right is no Tenant, yet by my accepting of Rent from him, I make him one not withstanding his forfeiture. To exercise a Judicial Act, relates so much to the Person legally con­stituted a Judg, that if I submit my Cause [Page 16]to him that is not so, and suffer, I sin a­gainst my own Liberty. In each of these what I do is good, but partakes somewhat with the evil of another, In our Spiritual affairs, that is a full instance, 1 Cor. 10.18. They that eat of the Sacrifice partake of the Altar; that is, from the Relation and Con­nexion betwixt the Altar and the Gift. Mat. 23.19. The Altar sanctifieth the Gift. It is either not a Sacrifice, or not a Lawful Sa­crifice, but by reason of the Altar.

For Application to the Case.

1. My being present, and hearing of a Conformist, no Approbation of the evil of his Conformity, and so no Occasional or Tran­sient Relation is raised thereby. Approbati­on is an act of the mind or heart; It is not shewed to him or others by me, until it be expressed outwardly by my words or gestures which I have not in this case any occasion to do; his evil being done elsewhere, and formerly, and not in our presence that now hear him.

2. Nor is there any Set or Standing Re­lation between him and me, though he Preach and I Hear him constantly: This creates no Church-fellowship or Communion. To Instruct and Learn, is an humane or [Page 17]natural converse, and differs not from teaching or learning any other faculty, though the Subject matter I hear be divine. It's true, by the addition of a special institu­tion, it becomes a Church-Ordinance: so giving of Alms, visiting of the Sick, and the like, which are actions of Common hu­manity, when brought under a special In­stitution do thereby become as much Church-Ordinances as Preaching. 2 Cor. 6.14. What fellowship hath Light with Darkness? or a Believer with an Infidel? that is, in Respect to Church Communion and fellowship, there is none: yet a Believer and an Infidel may Preach and Hear, may Teach and be Taught, Act. 17.1 Cor. 14. Rom. 1.13.

3. For any special Tincture derived from his evil to the Duty we perform with him; it must be either from the Sins of his Person, or his Ordination: The former hath been spoken to. As for the evil of his Ordi­nation, it relates not to his Preaching, by and such near alliance, as that the one may not be done without the other. It is the duty of all Christians (saith Ames) to do their utmost to advance the Kingdom of God, and therefore to teach others the Knowledg of God. Why may not a man Preach and In­struct Others, if he be able, by word of mouth▪ as well as by Writing and Printing Theo­logical [Page 18]Discourses? This latter was never questioned by any sober man.

Objections Answered.

Object, 1.

My prsesence at such mens Preaching, if I be silent and give no Testimony agaist them, will be an encouragement to their Way.

Answ. 1.

If I had no other just and apparent reason for my being present, it might be so inter­preted, but my presence relates, and ought so to be judged, unto the Word Preached. If I be present in some consecreated place a­dorned with Images, to hear a Sermon, my presence ought not to be interpreted a Countenancing those Superstitions, but the Preaching of Gods Word. When the Preach­ing of Christ, and a malicious Spirit, was in one man, Pauls rejoycing at the one, was no Countenancing of the other.

Answ. 2.

We do not so easily derive guilt or pol­lution by being present or in the Company of Sinners, though we do not testify against them, when they are not in Spiritual Com­munion with us. A little Leaven leaveneth the whole Lump, but no more. The Con­tagion goeth no further than the Relation. [Page 19]The Apostle, 1 Cor. 5.9. layeth down clearly this difference from that verse to the end. He speaks of judging, that is censu­ring of others, that we may prevent parta­king with them in the guilt. By judging, we are to understand not only the Censure it self, but the telling our Brother, the re­proving, convincing, and other private du­ties in relation thereunto, and avoiding their Company afterwards: and it is applyed with distinction of persons in respect of their relation to us: There are Fornicators of this World, ver. 10. and such are without, ver. 12. Now there is not that obligation lying upon us to reprove their Sins, as if a Brother be a Fornicator, ver. 11. In some cases we may be silent, and leave the for­mer to the Judgment of God, ver. 13. But in no case if he be a Brother.

Answ. 3.

To Reprove or give Testimony against an evil, is a tender duty, and we may easily miscarry if the rules thereof be not strictly observed. 1. Especially, if publick in the Face of a Congregation come together peaceably to worship God. 2. And the Person an Elder, at least so reputed generally by the Congregation. 3. The Sin also must be a gross Sin, and apparent so to the As­sembly. But if it be doubtful, as in our [Page 20]Case, whether it be a Sin, or such a Sin? whether committed upon the place, or for­merly we know not where, nor how long since? if possible he hath repented of it, or is able to clear himself at least from the gros­ness of it? I say, in such a case, were he a Bro­ther, and in this Relation, I have no Call to reprove, or give a publick testimony, in such time or place especially.

Answ. 4.

This Objection renders not my coming to hear an evil, but my not reproving. I am the rather bound to come, for I have hereby not only an opportunity to receive, but to do good, if such reproving be a duty.

Object. 2.

Ordination and Conformity, and Common-Prayers, and Ceremonies, are connexed with Preaching, as one intire Service; by partaking therefore of the one, we contract the pollution of the other.

Answ. I.

What God himself in a moral way joyn­eth together, no man may separate, only God himself: But what God in Nature hath joyned together, he gives us leave to separate, as Chaff from Wheat, &c. And so likewise for what man joyneth together, especially in the Service of God, and such [Page 21]matters thereof as God, hath not required; A Set Liturgy or Stinted Form of Prayer for Matter and Words to be used (much less to be inseparably joyned with Preaching) is not required by the Lord, nor indeed is there any such necessary dependance by our Laws.

Answ. 2.

Ordination is so necessarily connexed with Preaching, either by God or Man: Scripture-light mention Preaching and Hearing as duties, Rom. 10. whereas yet there could be no Ordination; Nor are they so inseparably joyned by our Laws: But if they were, it is sufficient to my Conscience that God hath not so joyned them. Our actings, and the reasons or grounds of them, are not to be interpreted in Church-Matters by Humane Laws; If they were, it would be difficult to inhabit in some Com­mon-wealths with a good Conscience. Our living within the precincts of such a Pa­rish, our Laws interpret a being of the same particular Church with them for all Church-Ordinances: but this being mans Law only, we judg our selves not so necessa­rily involved by our habitation. A Church according to Scripture is a Spiritual body: The Limits are part of the essence and con­stitution of such a body, and therefore ought [Page 22]to be Spiritual and of the same nature, and not meerly humane; as is the division of Parishes.

Answ. 3.

To speak more properly, we cannot say neerness by an external disposition of things connexeth them anymore, than Unity makes kindred, or of one Blood. No, it must be where there is such a dependency of things, that the being, at leastwise the orderly being of the one is not without the other. In this Sense Baptizing, breaking of Bread, and other Ordinances that relate to, and neces­sarily depend on an Office, and connexed with it; and so our being called thereunto, and invested therein; and if the person with whom I partake, be either not in such an Office, or in any apparent disorderly way, I partake with his Sin; so near are these Duties related in their orderly Administra­tion. But Preaching in a Providential way, as by persons gifted, and out of their Cha­rity administring to us, or by Provision of the Magistrate, is altogether of another na­ture. And though Ordination and Preach­ing be joyned together in the vulgar esteem; yet it's not the voice or sanction of Man can bring things into a nearer Relation, than the Spirit hath set them.

Object. 3.

Why may we not as well go to Common-Prayer?

Answ.

If there were no other things to be obje­cted against those Prayers, but Ordination, Conformity, or other Sins of the Ministers, questionless we may: for we question not to joyn with, them in Prayer before or after Sermon, more than with his Preaching.

Object. 4.

Where there is any better Preaching then Ordinary, especially in the City, it is so thron­ged, as by that time Prayers are ended, there is no hearing.

Answ.

It is one thing to abstain upon such an account which is prudential only, as upon the account of bodily infirmity: another thing to abstain upon the opinion of unlaw­fulness. Now the thing contended for, is to vindicate the Lawfulness of hearing such Ministers, notwithstanding what hath been objected to the contrary, and to deliver us from an error of very ill consequence: for this Opinion, that it is unlawful to hear such Ministers as have been spoken of, is an er­ror of very ill consequence, in many re­spects.

1. It puts us upon such singularity, as by which we divide in our practice, not only from our Brethren of the Presbyterian per­swasion, but likewise from divers of the soberest Separatists. Where a good Consci­ence necessitates us in many things to differ from other Godly Brethren on each hand, it is a sad Providence to have these differences increased by erronious Con­science.

2. Except it be the reading of Scriptures, this Ordinance alone, of all other publick Ordinances amongst us, hath by the good hand of God been kept and continued by our National Establishment free in it self from all disputable Mixtures and Imposi­tions; And the benefit and fruit of this Publick Ministry, hath accordingly been visibly great, as in any part of the World. Let us fear therefore lest we our selves now by raising groundless scruples, lay this as low, as others by their unwar­rantable additions have done the other pub­lick Ordinances.

3. In most of the misperswasions of these later times, by which mens Minds have been corrupted, I find in whatsoever otherwise they differ one from another, [Page 25]yet in this they agree, that its unlawful to hear in publick; Which I am perswaded is one constant design of Satan in the variety of ways in Religion he hath set on Foot by Jesuites amongst us. Let us there­fore be the more aware of whatsoever tends that way.

4. Such reasonings against hearing, though they convince not the unlawfulness of it, yet they leave such prejudices in the minds of them which are tender, as perplex and render Hearing less profitable and edifying, even to those that are perswaded of its Lawfulness. To bring the lawfulness of known Ordinances under dispute for some circumstances affixed, hath ever been of great advantage to Satan, whether in such disputes he prevails or not: For men are either beaten wholly off from the duty, or perform it with a more remiss and unsuta­ble Spirit, which lyeth more directly in the way to prevent a blessing, than the evils of others we ordinarily Object. Those disputes about the morality of the Sabbath, as they have prevailed with many to a total neglect, so with more to a remiss observance, though convinced of it as a moral Duty. If for Substance the Duty be so [Page 26]evident, as not to be liable to a dispute in it self (as this of Hearing is): then Satan fastens Scruples about Circumstances; which prevailing, we have as little benefit from the Ordinance or Duty, as if it were not.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.