S. Pauls Reproof, OR A Vindication of the Church of England from the Errours and Superstitions of the Church of Rome. Delivered in a Sermon preached at Great S. Peters Church in Norwich.
I hear that there be divisions among you.
WHen I did consider the hard usages and tedious alterations of this Nation, where all things were in confusion, the right being perverted, injustice erected, and the Church persecuted, I could not but lament such a deplorable condition; but when I look upon that happy change which gives a new face unto this people, and brings all things to its order, I must sincerely confess, that it is Gods admirable work: for brethren, you see that which to me and many others seemed impossible; [Page 2]you see our gracious Prince set upon his Throne, which his Majesty by the space of many years could not approach, notwithstanding the affection and good will of his faithfull subjects; you see the glorious Charles the great Monarch of England in possession of his own Kingdomes, and with him peace and quietness for the good of the persecuted Church, that after a silence of persecution where she was not seen by the eyes of her afflicted Children, she may enjoy the silence of prosperity in all godliness.
But that great favour of our God is not regarded by many of this Kingdom, who so envy its happiness, that they seek with their unquiet minde to ruine it; they are divided from the rest of their brethren, when as they may be united together to the glory of the great God of heaven, the God of union, the advancing of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, and salvation of their souls.
Perhaps there are many present that will be offended at my discourse, but I will have them know, that my intention is not to please some, nor offend any; for it is onely to shew you what I with orthodox Learned men, conceive by the Scripture and Antiquity to be true; therefore I exhort you all in the Name of the Almighty God, whom you adore and fear, that you hear me with attention, humility and charity, and above all, if there be any in this Congregation that are contentious, I desire them to hear me without partiality and prejudice, [Page 3]that I with the grace of our blessed Saviour may remove the spirit of contention which our grand Apostle Paul blameth in the Corinthians, for in the 16, ver. speaking to the contentious, he saith (if they would remain in that humour) if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custome, neither the Churches of God; after which he reproves the Corinthians for their irregularities by which they did prophane the Lords Supper, and caused divisions in the Church, saying, I praise you not that you come together, not for the better but for the worse, for when you come together in the Church (I hear that there be divisions among you) which last words I have chosen to entertain you with, by the special assistance of the blessed Spirit; but that you may have a clear intelligence of them, I shall divide my Text into two parts, where in the first I shall speak of the divisions, and in the second part I shall shew you the causes and ocasions of them as you may see in my Text, I hear that there be divisions among you,
The first part.
If oppression be a monster with many heads, so is division which you cannot look upon without fear and horrour, in Kingdomes, Families and Churches, for you know that there is a civil or political division which ruineth all things in Kingdomes, Cities, and Villages, for by that division Kingdomes are destroyed, men slain, Virgins defloured, women abused, children corrupted, Cities [Page 4]everted, Villages ruined, houses by fire consumed, Palaces demolished, and the most pleasant dwellings wasted, nay, more then that Emperours and glorious Kings dethroniz'd; so that nothing but desolation and ruine appears before our eyes, as you your selves lately have seen in this Kingdom; but this monster of division is not satisfied to spoil the glorious Kingdomes of the earth; it reacheth further unto private families to confound them, for there is a domestical division which everteth all oeconomical order and government, and procreates confusion and disorder in families, for in that fatal division the Father is against the Son, the Son against the Father, the mother against the daughter, the daughter against the mother, the husband hates his wife, and the wife despiseth her husband; nay, you see that monster of division go up and down in the house to the ruine and destruction of all things in families, for in that division Parents neglect their children, with their employments, and spend all that they have by profusion and carelesness.
But me thinks, I see this monster of division go yet further, and by a damnable presumption endeavour to enter into the Church of God to spoil and defile it; me thinks it prevaileth so far that the Church seems rather a chaos or confusion then a distinct fabrick, and if that Ecclesiastical monster be not stayed that it go no further, it will spoil and ruine the sacred house of the Almighty God; [Page 5]which the Apostle Paul did well know, for hearing of the Ecclesiastical diuision among the Corinthians, he writes unto them to extinguish it, saying I hear that there be divisions among you: I hear saith the Apostle, not by a special revelation (as if God should have revealed him that which the Corinthians would not have him know) but by letters, or rather by some that came from Corinth, who informed S. Paul of the disorders of the Corinthians, and so writing unto them saith, I hear that there be divisions among you, as he had told them in the 2. verse of the first Chapter, concerning their contentions about Paul, Apollo, and Cephas; it hath bean declared unto me that there are contentions among you;
But for a clear intelligence of the Ecclesiastical division of which the Apostle here speaks, you must observe that it is vel circa doctrinam vel circa disciplinam vel circa ceremonias; Either about the doctrine, or about the discipline, or about ceremonies where the Ecclesiastical division about the doctrine, is that by which the true principles & fundamental points of Religion are everted, which is such a pernicious division that from thence comes her pestilent daughter heresie; the division about discipline is that by which the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction established for the correction of Christian sinners, and preservation of the Church is destroyed, which is that division which most shamefully brings forth licentiousness; the Ecclesiastical [Page 6]division about Ceremonies, is that by which the rights of the Church observed in the outward service of God, are most irreverently despised and abolished, which is a division from which cometh schisme, which the Apostle speaks of when he saith, I hear that there be divisions among you; for the word of my Text in the Original is [...] schismes, which nevertheless may be extended to the division about doctrine and discipline, by which the Church is rent as well as by that of Ceremonies and much more.
Indeed all these divisions were to be found among the Corinthians; for among them some there were who would corrupt the doctrine by their erroneous opinions, some among the Corinthians did condemn the marriage, not as if it were instituted by a wicked God or by the devil (as Simon and Saturninus said) but as a thing somerhing impure which was not fit for a Christian, whose life was to be every way most pure, which obliged the Corinthians to write unto the Apostle Paul to have his judgement about it, which was, that marriage was lawfull for every man, as you may see in the 7. Chapter of our Epistle, nay, honourable in all, and the bed undefiled; some among the Corinthians being infected with the Sadduces heresie, denied the resurrection of the bodies, as you may observe in the 15. Chapter: some would defile the Christian doctrine with Judaicall Superstitions, which some false Doctours would introduce [Page 7]in the Church as necessary to salvation; moreover they would infect the doctrine of the Gospel with the prophanations of the Gentiles, as it appears by the 8. and 10. Chapter; Concerning the Discipline and government of the Church some there were among the Corinthians who would not have any, desiring to live according to their own minds, that they might give themselves to all licentiousness without any reprehension or correction; which prevailed so far, that the Church of Corinth did bear with the whoremongers, drunkards, and contentious; which gave our Apostle occasion to write the 5. and 6. Chapters of our Epistle to extinguish that monster of licentiousness.
As for the Ceremonies, there was division in the Church; for among the Corinthians some would not submit themselves unto the performance of them, as you may see in our Chapter; where you must observe that the divisions of the Corinthians, were not about the saving knowledge of Jesus Christ, nor about heresie which everteth the doctrine; but about the manner of preaching and praying, and about the manner of receiving the holy Sacrament: Concerning the first, the contention was about the covering of the head, as if we should now dispute about a hat and a coife, for men and women had engaged themselves in that division: According to the custome of the Corinthians, as well as to that of the Church [Page 8]of England the men were to be uncovered as well during the Sermon as during the prayers, and women as now they are, were to be covered, as you may see by the 4. and 5. verses of our Chapter, where we may very well take praying and prophesying actively and passively; actively, for those that pray and preach, and passively for those that joyn their vows and prayers with him that prayeth, as those that are present at the hearing of him that preacheth; so that not onely he that did preach according to the custome of the Church of Corinth, was to be uncovered, but those also that were present at the hearing of the Sermon, but some lovers of divisions would not submit to that custome; Some men covered themselves in the holy Assemblies, and some women were uncovered, which S. Paul hearing of, endeavoureth to instruct them about these things, shewing them the lawfulness of that custome, which the Church had thought fit to be observed by both Sexes in their publick and holy meetings from the 6. ver. to the 16. ver.
For the manner of receiving the holy Sacrament, be it standing or kneeling, the Apostle leaves it to the custome and ordering of the Church, that such things might be established not by the common people, but by the Ecclesiastical Superiours; for these injunctions belong onely to them, as being sub potestate ordinis, under the power of order, which is insinuated in the [Page 9]1 Corinth. 14. at the last verse; Let all things be done, (that is, by the Ecclesiastical Superiours) decently and in order; but if these injunctions regard the Ecclesiastical Superiours, know ye also that the Ecclesiastical corrections for the prophanation of the Lords Supper belong to their persons, as it appeareth by our Text, I hear that there be divisions among you, which hath relation to the following verses, where the Apostle condemns the profanation of the Corinthians against the holy Sacrament.
And indeed it was very sit for the Apostle to condemn their profanation which was committed in their banquets of charity, which were kept in the Church before the participation of the Sacrament; for it came to pass soon after the institution of these banquets, that the rich men that were at the expences of them, would not tarry for the poor, and so the rich were drunk, and the poor hungry, as the Apostle speaks in the 21 ver. of our Chapter; the rich man came to the Sacrament without reverence, being in that sinfull and shamefull condition, and the poor discontented; for (as I have said) these banquets were kept in the Church before the reception of the holy Sacrament, although soon after the Apostles time that custome was changed, and these banquets kept after its celebration, as it appears by Tertul. Apolog. for the Christians; and Chrysostome in moral. homil. 27. their prophanation then caused [Page 10]divisions in the Church, and disorder among the Christian Corinthians, which obligeth the Apostle Paul to write and say, I hear that there be divisions among you.
But brethren, if all these things which I have mentioned were among the Corinthians, give me leave to tell you without offence, that the same things are to be found among us who have desiled the glorious Church of England, as the Corinthians did the eminent Church of Corinth: it was that Ecclesiastical monster of division that spoiled it when it did appear against doctrine, discipline and Ceremonies; and it is that monster that is yet ready to ruine that glorious Church, which as a Phoenix is newly born of her ashes; consider I beseech you the divisions which are yet entertained amongst us, and you shall see that they regard the Doctrine, Discipline, and Ceremonies, for heresie reigneth yet in England; Socinians, Anabaptists, Quakers and Millenaries, with others, appear in great number, and with a damnable considence endeavour to corrupt and desile the Evangelical doctrine, that they may insinuate and scatter their errours and heresies among the poor Christian people; licentiousness appeareth too much in this Kingdom; we are willing to give our selves to all the corruptions of the world; but we are not willing to be reproved for our sins, we slatter our selves in our iniquities, and wickedly make use of the Christian liberty to maintain our [Page 11]rebellion: as for Schism it is too well known in this Countrey, and I wish (as my duty with my affection to this Nation obligeth me) that that monster might be hated of all, and that those that have been contentious might quietly return into the Church; let them consider that those things which they trouble the Church for, touch not the substance and body of Religion, but onely the circumstances of it, and they shall learn of our Apostle to hate divisions; for (saith he) speaking about these things to the Corinthians, if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the Churches of God; and to correct their irregularities about the holy Sacrament, I hear that there be divisions among you, which shews the contentious that schism about Ceremonies leads to prophanation about other things, and to heresie, if it be not stayed; but behold, there are some monsters that appear unto me black and obscure, coming from the dark prison of the prince of the air, the God of this world, and that is pride with many other daughters of hell, which you shall see in the second part of my Text.
The second Part.
As pride made division between God and the Angels, that are now devils, and ambition did alienate our first Parents from God, so pride and ambition makes a division between the Church and her children; for you shall often see the children of the Church to be so ambitious, that they [Page 12]will esteem themselves above their mother, and indeed there is no schismatick, much more an heretick but is ambitious, and so the Shoolmen speak when they say, that a Schismatick is one who retaining the fundamental points of Religion rends impudently the Church by reason of some Rights and Ceremonies which his ambition approves not of; but me thinks that the next daughter of hell is envy, which seems sad by reason of the union which she fears in this Kingdom, for envy loves nothing but division, because that vice and immoderate affection of our soul, will never permit us to like what is done by those that we do not like, or to consent unto these things which we had no hand to in their Institution; for in the injunction of such things we are perswaded by that fatal passion that our advantage is hindred or diminished: but behold there is another which is covered with a very black garment, where you can discern nothing, and that is ignorance, which cannot inform us of the nature of those things which are imposed upon us by our Superiours, for Ignorance makes us esteem the circumstances and garments of Religion to be of as high a nature as the body and substance thereof, and by that means we cannot agree, nor receive the circumstantial things which our Superiours impose upon us for the good order of the Christian Church: but further give me leave to let another monstrous daughter of hell appear with the others, that we may eschew [Page 13]the fatal effects thereof, in the knowledge of her nature, and that is obstinacy, which is not content to cause division but will countenance it: for obstinacy (as every one knows) will always have us to defend that which we once have maintained and blame that which we once have declaimed against although we know not any reason for it, and so the obstinate men will remain in their errours and entertain division.
Now if you consider the causes of our divisions without partiality, you will confess with me, that Pride, Envy, Ignorance, and Obstinacy, were those monsters which would not permit, as now will not yet suffer the fomenters of division to adhere to those things which their Superiours imposed upon them; for otherwise I do verily beleeve, that they had not embroyled this Nation with such a cruel war; neither had they upon their pretended occasions so violently persecuted the Church; for these things which many (who agree in the substance of Religion with their mother the Church) contended about, are harmless and cannot offend moderate and prudent men, for not any of the authours of the division of this Kingdom, I hope, will blame the moderation of the first Reformers of the Church of England, who seriously examined the Church of Rome in its Doctrine, Discipline, and Worship, to reject the Errours and Heresies of the Doctrine, the Tyranny and oppression of the Discipline, and the [Page 14]Superstitions of the Worship; and retain that which the Church of Rome had from the Christian Primitive Church; nay, more then that, they took a way the abuse of things indifferent in their nature, and reduced them to a lawfull use.
But for all that, some contentious, like those that were in Corinth, of whom the Apostle speaks when he saith, I hear that there be divisions among you, would not be satisfied, they blamed many things that could be easily passed by, as now many of their imitatours do; for the white colour of the garments of the Church of England offend their sight, they say that these garments are superstitiously used in the Church of Rome; as if in the Church of Rome the Clergy regular & secular did not use garments of several other colours as well as white; nay, more then that, those that know the Church of Rome, as I have reason to know it (having lived among them, & in their communion 23 or 24 years) are not ignorant that she makes use of all sorts of colours, so that if we would not use any of those she makes use of, we should go all naked, & so we should prove very fit to be among the Adamites; but as S. Jerome saith very well against Pelagius what enmity is it against God if the Bishop, Priest and Deacon, do go in white vestments when they are to officiate.
Moreover, they will not admit the singing of the Creed nor many pious Songs, when other Protestants beyond the Sea, whom the contentious [Page 15]approve of, sing the Lords Prayer in their temple, as the Dutch Churches and those of Hesson, or the ten Commandments, with that which we call the Song of Simeon, as our French Reformed Churches and others do; and if they tell me, that the Church of England cannot produce any passage of Scripture for the singing of the Creed, &c. I answer, that it is not necessary for circumstantial things, and that our Protestants beyond the sea, whom the causers of division in this Kingdom do approve of, cannot bring any passage of Scripture to prove the singing of the Lords Prayer, and the ten Commandments.
But their contentious humour goes yet further, for they will not have the people answer in the celebration of the Divine Service, and they are offended at the repetitions which the Church of England makes use of; but
For the first, I say, that it is good according to the custome of the Church of England, to joyn our selves with the Pastours in the Church, as you did this day, in the celebration of the Divine Service, for it is nothing else but a sacred conce [...]t in imitation of that which the sacred Angels make use of in heaven in their praising of the Lord, as you may see in Isa. 6. and the Church of England is not the onely Church amongst the Reformed which makes use of answers in the celebration of the Divine Service, for the Reformed Churches of Hungaria, Transilvania and Lithuania, as I am [Page 16]credibly informed, make use of some answers in their Divine Service; but I need not to pleade in that manner; for if in that the Church of England should be alone among the Protestant Churches, I would hold it lawfull, because it is not against Scripture but rather conformable to it; when the blessed spirits and sacred Angels cry or answer one to another, Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord of Hosts.
Concerning the repetitions of the Church, let me tell you that they are as so many productions of a sacred and vehement affection like unto that of David, Lord, have mercy upon me, Lord, have mercy upon me; and that of the Angels, Holy, Holy, Holy; indeed if the Church of England should make use of her repetitions by number, as the Church of Rome doth, so that by the repeating of so many times such a prayer she should think to merit something before God, as the relaxation of some temporal punishment, or to obtain the pardon of her sins for 40. 50. or a 100. years; I would account them vain and superstitious, but it is clear that she doth not do it, for all that the Church of England doth intend in her repetitions, as I conceive is to inflame our zeal and affection towards God; as the Prophet David left us an example, that we might conform our selves to it; repeating many times the wonderful favours of our God towards the humane kinde, and saying Psal. 136. in every verse for his mercy endureth for ever.
But this is not all which the Authours of our divisions condemn, for the signe of the Cross made upon the forehead of the baptized Infants, passeth for a superstition and a rest of Papism, as the commemoration of the principal mysteries of our redemption, observed at certain days of the year, with the Festival days of the Blessed Virgin, the Apostles, and Martyrs; nay, more then that, they cannot endure to hear any thing about the bowing to the Name of Jesus.
But for the signe of the Cross, those that have perused the antiquity know that it was used in the Christian primitive Church for a signe of the Christian profession, as it appeareth by Tertullian, Cyprian, and Augustine de verbis Domini the eighth Sermon, and that is granted by our Learned Peter du Moulin in his little Tractate of the Traditions, Chap. 25. and I will not omit our judicious Bucer, who saith, in his first Book De Regno Christi, cap. 12. ‘I think that the signe of the Cross is neither indecent nor unprofitable, non tam quod est in Ecclesia usus antiquissimi, quam quod est admodum simplex & praesentis admonitionis crucis Christi; not so much because it is of an ancient use in the Church, as that it is very innocent, and of a present admonition of the Cross of Christ.’
I confess that the signe of the Cross is superstitiously used in the Church of Rome, for they make use of it with their holy water for the expiation [Page 18]of their venial sins, which are not to be found in the Scripture, nor in antiquity, nor in nature; they make use of the signe of the Cross to drive away the devil and scare him; they use it before a Cross, because it hath been cause (as they say) of great wonders, and occasion of the conversion of S. Christopher, who (as some of them say) was before engaged in the service of the devil, although it is very true, that there was never such a man as they imagine him to be: nay, they make use of the signe of the Cross before and after their meat, some being of that perswasion, that their meat and drink cannot profit them without that signe; but the Church of England admits none of these Superstitions, for she onely makes use of the signe of the Cross for a mark and token of the Christian profession as it was used in the Primitive Church.
And do not tell me, that it was upon occasions which are not now to be found among us, for I will tell you, that now the occasions are as great if not greater, being among those who under the profession of Christ endeavour to ruine his Church; and if that were no sin to do it in the Primitive Church, as I hope the contentious will confess, I may certainly say that it is none now to do it; but those that condemn the signe of the Cross, should not at all speak against it, for if they are persecuted as they say, let them according to the custom of the Church Primitive, make the signe of the Cross among themselves.
As for the Festival days, or the commemoration of the principal mysteries of our Redemption, and other special favours of God which gloriously shined in the Blessed Virgin, the Apostles, and Martyrs, observed at certain days of the year; it is well known to such as are but meanly read, that it was the custome of the Christian Church before the Apostatick seat of Rome, as you may see by Jerome in his Commentary upon the Epistle to the Galatians, cha. 4. adding there further, that soon after the Apostles time the Histories of their lives and deaths were read in the Church, and their godly examples commended to the people; and although Antiquity is not sufficient of it self to justifie this or that Observation, yet next unto the Holy Scriptures it is to be reverenced according to that of S. Austin, Epist. 118. tom. 2. post sacras Scriptur as ea nobis sunt observanda quae vel ab Apostolis profecta esse per traditionem, vel ab universalibus consiliis desinita esse judicantur; those things are by us to be observed next unto the Holy Scriptures, which are judged to come from the Apostles by tradition, or to have been desined by general Councils.
Indeed we must acknowledge, that many superstitions are used these days in the Church of Rome; for in the Festival dayes of the blessed Virgin, and holy Apostles, those of the Church of Rome pretend to merit before God in their sinfull devotions before such an Altar and no other, [Page 20]and in such a Chappel; they offer unto them Vows, present them their prayers, and give them an honour which is due unto God; which if these Saints had any knowledge of, they without doubt would implore the Divine Majesty to punish their presumption; for if they could not endure such an honour upon the earth, Act. 10.14. as being onely proper to God, much less will they suffer it in heaven, being indued with a greater charity toward the God of glory, whom they must reverently adore; therefore the Church of England admits not these Superstitions in her Festival days; she doth nothing but meditate these days on the wonderfull graces of God, which did appear in these Saints, of whom she celebrates the commemoration, and desireth of God, that she may imitate them in the holy life and pious conversation which they did leade upon the earth, and so she saith with S. Austin lib. de vera relig. cap. 55. Sancti honorandi sunt propter imitationem, sed non adorandi propter religionem, the Saints are to be honoured for imitation, but not worshipped for Religion, for although these days are kept holy in Commemoration of the Saints, yet they are not kept holy to the Saints but to God.
For the bowing at the Name of Jesus, I confess, that at first coming from the Church of Rome I thought it was superstitious, but having seriously examined the thing, I see that it can be done without superstition; for we owe to our blessed [Page 21]Saviour an outward and inward reverence, because Christ hath redeemed not onely our souls but also our bodies from eternal corruption, and indeed we may observe that in Phil. 2.10. where it is said, that at the Name of Jesus every knee shall bow, of things in heaven, things in earth, and things under the earth; for although the Apostle speaks immediately of the glory and authority given our Saviour, yet we must make it known inwardly and outwardly, by an inward and outward reverence: and the famous Zanchius acknowledgeth the lawfullness of the bowing at the Name of Jesus, in that verse of the Epistle to the Philippians, saying, whereas before the Name of Jesus was blasphemed by almost all the Jews, after his death his Divinity being manifested, he is adored of all men, so that even at the mentioning of the Name of Jesus they all how their knees to him: atque hinc non dubito quin profecta sit illa antiquissima consuetudo in Ecclesus, ut cum nominatur Jesus omnes aperiant caput in testimonium reverentiae & adorationis: ‘and I doubt not but that from thence came that ancient custom used in the Churches, that all should uncover their heads at the naming of Jesus, in signe of reverence and adoration,’ and that is used not onely in the Reformed Churches of England, but also in those of the Palatinate, as I have heard of those that came from that place.
Indeed I must confess, that to do it as the Church [Page 22]of Rome doth, is a thing superstitious, for they place some vertue in the Name of Jesus, qua nomen, consisting of its two syllables; so that they superstitiously worship the word it self; nay, more then that, they say, that the Name of Jesus, qua nomen, is greater, holier, and more reverent, then the Name of God, as Cornel. à lapide expresses; but the Church of England admits no such thing, she bows at the Name of Jesus, to express a signe of the reverence which she owes not to the word it self, but to Christ signified by the word; and there is no more superstition in that, then there is in the kneeling at these words, Et verbum caro factum est, and the Word was made flesh; but some of the Learned Protestant Doctours conceive no Superstition at the kneeling at these words; for as Peter Martyr Coc. com. Class. 4. cap. 10. sect. 50. saith, many there be who piously kneel and worship at the hearing of these words of the Gospel, [and the Word was made flesh,] and yet it must not be said, that these words themselves are worshipped, but that which is by them signified; then there is no Superstition at the bowing at the Name of Jesus.
I could raise many other Objections, which those make who love division, but I will not be tedious, it is enough to tell you, that that which our divided people, enemy of the Episcopal Government, and of all the Rights which the Church of England observeth, blames, is approved of by all the Protestants beyond the Seas as good or [Page 23]esteemed as indifferent; which may be enjoyned and made necessary necessitate convenientiae by the Ecclesiastical Superiours; and I remember that I heard from a Polander with whom I was sometimes at Paris, that in the Reformed Churches of Bohemia, and those of little Poland, the people kneeling did receive the Sacrament, and that these Protestants did celebrate the Feasts of our blessed Saviour, of the Virgin Mary mother of Christ, and of the Apostles; as in all these Churches and others, they bury the dead with certain forms, which contain Lectures, Hymns, and Prayers, which as in the Church of England shew the desire we Christians ought to have for the enjoying of the eternal felicity and glory both in body and soul, with those that are departed this life in the faith of Jesus Christ; whereof the Church of Rome superstitiously prays for the dead, that they may enjoy an eternal rest, and that their souls may be delivered from the flames of Putgatory, which is a place which they cannot finde in the Scripture, nor in the Writings of the Doctours of the Primitive Church, as it appears by some of the Learnedest of our adversaries, for Fisher Bishop of Rochester in his Writings egainst Luther, says, that in the ancient Writers there is little or no mention of Purgatory; and Durand doth ingeniously confess, that Ambrose, Austin, Hilary and Jerome do not at all speak of Purgatory; as Marous as it is reported Bishop of Ephesus declared in the Councel [Page 24]of Florence, that Chrysostome denied it; by that then you see that those things which the Church of England observeth, are harmless, and have nothing of Popery with them, which is so evident, that some of the most eminent Ministers of the Reformed Churches of France, M. du Moulin, and the Learned Bochart did in the English Churches follow their customes, which they did approve of as good and lawful, as it appears by their letters to several Bishops of England; for indeed I may say, if they had thought that their customes and ceremonies had been sinfull, they had not communicated with the Church of England.
And if you tell me, why do not then the Churches of France and others beyond the Seas, observe the same Ceremonies, I will answer with the Church of England according to the 34. of her Articles, that it is not necessary, that ceremonies be in all places one and utterly like, for at all times saith the Article, they have been divers, and may be changed according to the diversity of countreys, times, and mens manners; let then those that will not submit to the order of the Church consider these things, and I am sure that we shall not have occasion to say with the Apostle, I hear that there be divisions among you: Indeed brethren, not to submit our selves to the customes of the Churches in things which are not contrary to Scripture, is a signe of a notable frowardness, and a token of an humour which abhorreth tranquillity [Page 25]and concord, saith the Learned du Moulin, in his Book concerning traditions, chap. 24. pag. 346. for we ought to conform our selves to such customes and ceremonies of the Church; as Jerome in his Epistle to Lucinius, teaches us, saying, I think that I must tell you that the Ecclesiasticall Traditions, specially those that are not contrary to faith ought to be observed, as we have received them from our ancestors, and so speaks S. Ambrose to S. Austin, and S. Austin to Januarius, epist. 118. saying, when I am at Rome I fast on Saturday, but when I am at Millan, I do not fast; so when you come into some Church keep her custom, if you will not scandalize any nor be scandalized of any; and indeed it is necessary for Christians to submit to customs, not necessary in their natures, for if the evil be not so great as touching the doctrine, it may be very great as touching the manners and disorders which from thence come forth.
But give me leave to go yet further, to take away an errour which is common in this Nation, and among the enemies of the Church of England, who say, that the Liturgy is taken from the Mass, nay, is nothing but the Mass in English, celebrated in the same manner the Church of Rome doth, which makes a great impression in the common people.
To answer unto that; I say, that (although the Church of England had taken her Liturgy out of the Mass-book, it would not follow that the [Page 26]Liturgy should not be good except they shew me, that all which is in the Mass is false and erroneous, which cannot be: for if it were so, the Creed and the Lords Prayer, which is said with the Mass, should not be good, nay, should be erroneous; but let me tell you, that it is a false aspersion and calumny, which the contentious of this Nation, put upon the Liturgy of the Church of England, when they say, that it is drawn from the Mass, for in the Mass they shall not finde the manner of the confession and absolution of our sins, as it is inserted in the Liturgy of the Church of England; they shall not finde in the Mass the Te Deum, or song of S. Ambrose, the Benedicite, or Song of the three Children, as they are to be found in the English Liturgy; they shall not finde in the Mass, many prayers that are to be found in the Liturgy of the Church of England, nor the Litany which she makes use of; they shall not finde in the Mass the ten Commandments, nor the Commination or threatning made unto those who persevere in their iniquities, nor many other things, which are piously and truly set down in the English Liturgy; but they shall finde in the Mass the superstitious invocation of creatures, of Angels, men and women; the prayers for the souls of those who (as the Church of Rome saith, are in Purgatory, grounded upon the merits of the Saints, or on some bones which they call Reliques; and above all they shall finde in the Mass a new sacrifice of [Page 27]Jesus Christ offered unto God the Father for the living and the dead; but you shall not finde these things in the Liturgy of the Church of England, for the Church of England condemneth all these Superstitions and abominations in 22. and 31. of her Articles.
Moreover, the Liturgy of the Church of England is not onely different from the Mass in its matter and form, but also in the manner of its celebration, and use of it; for the Mass is onely celebrated in the morning, and after 12 of the clock there is no Mass private nor soleninal to be said; in a Cathedral Roman Church 20. or 30. Masses are sometimes celebrated at the same time in the several Chappels thereof, and one Mass being said, a Priest cometh in the place of the other, that hath finished his Mass to celebrate his, having afore confessed some of his sins to another Priest, and so sometimes about an hundred Masses will be celebrated in a morning in the same Cathedral: In the Mass, the Priest begins with a great signe of the Cross upon his forehead, his stomack and his shoulders, and then joyning his hands afore his breast, he saith, Introibo ad altare Dei, &c. and after the ending of the Introite, after the Consiteor, to God, to the Virgin Mary, to Michael the Archangel, to John the Baptist, to the Apostles Peter and Paul, and to all the Saints; the Priest goes up to the Altar to perform the Mass, speaking sometime in secret, sometime with a low [Page 28]voice, and sometime with a loud one, except it be a solemn Mass, where the voice is higher for the most part, and the Priest that celebrates it doth many things that are not observed in the private Mass, and speaks to the Incense, and blesses it in that manner, saying, be blessed Incense through him, in whose honour thou shalt be burned, and that in Latine, as the rest of the Mass: sometimes the Priest turneth himself, and shews his face to the people to say Orate fratres, Pray ye brethren, or Ite, missa est, go ye, this is the leave or dismission; at that part of the Mass called the Offertory, the young man or childe who answereth to the Priest, and serves him in a private Mass, or the sub-deacon which serveth the Priest with a Deacon, in a solemn Mass, goes up to the corner of the Altar, where he takes two little bottles, in one of which there is wine, and the other water; he gives them to the Priest that came to him; who takes them to pour into the Chalice or cup wine and water; after that the Priest draws himself to the middle of the Altar right against an Image of Christ upon the Cross, or of some Saint, where he makes the Signe of the Cross with the Chalice, which he after puts upon the Altar, and covers with the cloth called the Corporass: then the Priest comes again to him that serveth at the Mass, to wash his hands, saying, when the young man pours water upon his fingers, Lovabo manus meas inter innocentes, &c. I will wash my hands among [Page 29]the innocents, &c. in the canon of the Mass before the consecration of the Host, the Priest makes many signes of the Cross, and after the consecration many more, that the assaults of the devil may not prevail against it, as Innocent the third Pope teaches, lib. 2. de Myster. Missae, cap. 58. towards the ending of the Mass, the Priest stretches out to the young man, or other that serves him the empty Chalice, who pours wine into it where with the Priest washeth his mouth, because it is the wine of Purification; a little after he washeth his singers, wipes them, and drinks that washing, and then kissing the Altar he bows and inclines his head towards the Cross, and turning himself to the people, he finisheth the Mass, saying, Benedicat vos, &c. except it be a Mass for the dead where the Priest saith in lieu of it, Requiescant in pace, let them rest in peace.
As for the Vestments which they use in the Mass, they are also different from those of the Church of England; they make use of no Surplice in the Mass; for when the Priest dresses himself, first he puts the Amice, which covers the Priests head in the form of a hood, after the Amice the Priest puts the Albe, which is like a white shirt, about the borders whereof there is some light work with green or red silk, upon the Albe the Girdle is put, which is white, and adorned with two tossels of the same colour; the Stole comes after, which is for the most part very glorious, [Page 30]and hangs on the right and on the left hand of the Priest, who after the Stole puts the Maniple in the fashion of a napkin upon the left arm, and for the last Vestment he takes the Chasuble, which is a most rich Vestment that covers all the others that are upon him except the Amice, which especially is seen when a Friar celebrates the Mass: besides these Vestments, when a Bishop of the Church of Rome saith a Mass, he hath Sandals, which they call Apostolick shoes, he hath the Episcopal breeches, the Tunique, and the Dalmatique; he hath also the Episcopal Gloves, the Rings and the Cross, &c. which are as many enigmatical ornaments, and of an abstruse intelligence, which we shall leave to them; by that you see how the Church of England differeth from the Church of Rome, & the Liturgy from the service of the Mass, in its matter, form and manner of its celebration.
But me thinks, that I hear some of the factious say, whatsoever you say there is something of the Mass in the Liturgy of the Church of England, and much of the Breviary (which is a Book different from that of the Mass; to which I answer, that there is nothing of the corrupted service of the Mass; and if there be something in the Liturgy which is observed and said with the Mass, and read in the Breviary, I say that in is what is good and what was observed in the Christian Primitive Church, leaving what was not good to the Church of Rome and her superstitious inventions.
Conclusion and Application.
Now let us conclude with Application, and to remove the divisions which are now in the Land, let us be of one minde, and of one perswasion, that we may see this Kingdom flourish in peace and truth: for if divisions cause such disorders and confusions in States, Families, and Churches, as you your selves by sad experience know, you will confess with me, that union cannot but bring peace, and procreate good order unto them; for union conserveth the kingdoms of the earth, keeps families in awe, and preserveth the Churches of God from schism, licentiousness and heresie; you know that the God of heaven is a God of union, who hateth division which destroyeth his works of nature, and that of his grace, in which appeareth an admirable and inexplicable union; for by the work of his grace our blessed Saviour united unto God those who were divided from him by their iniquities, and by that gracious work, earth is united with heaven, and men with Angels.
Then let us all that are here present embrace that vertue and daughter of heaven, union, which leads us to the God of order: all the sacred Scripture preacheth nothing else but union, and as our Apostle Paul exhorteth unto it the Corinthians, so do I exhort you all unto union, and beseech you with him by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same things, and that there be [Page 32]no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joyned together in the same minde, and in the same judgement, 1 Cor. 1.10. and do not tell me, that your conscience cannot bear with those things which are imposed upon you; for if you seriously consider the occasions of our fatal divisions, you will finde them to be no sufficient occasions; examine without partiality, your reasons, and I am sure that you will not finde any sufficient argument for your division; for all that you can plead, will appear to be under some of those monsters, pride, envy, ignorance or obstinacy: do not say in your selves, I have so much spoken against these circumstantial things, that I do not know how I shall submit my self again to these orders and injunctions; for besides you have the commandment of an August Parliament, which you must submit unto, let me tell you that such considerations proceed from the devil, the god of this world, and the Prince of division, who doth what he can to hinder the glorious union which we hope the great God of heaven, will give unto this Nation, to the glory of his great Name, and the advancing of the spiritual kingdom of his Son Jesus Christ.
Let us repent, brethren, in the consideration of our sins, which brought these disorders in this kingdom; it is no shame before God, and angels, and men, but rather a commendation and glory; let men say what they will, but regard not what [Page 33]they say, obey God, the King, and the Church; but let your obedience be sincere and without hypocrisie, otherwise you keep the divisions in your hearts, which will break out at the first occasion.
Consider these things with an impartial eye, and I am sure that you will endeavour to banish out of this Nation that horrible and bloudy monster of division, and that for the circumstances and the garments of Religion, you will not embroil this glorious kingdom with new wars, and spoil the Church of God to give way to all schismaticks and hereticks, who arise from the ruine of the Church: I could go yet further in the representation of the disorders which are caused by contentious persons, but I will not any longer trespass on your patience, for I will finish my discourse at this time, desiring that the peace of God which passeth all understanding, may keep your hearts and minde from schism, licentiousness, and heresie: Amen.