A letter to a member of Parliament with two discourses enclosed in it : I. the one shewing the reason why a law should pass to punish adultery with death, II. the other shewing the reasons why the writ, De hæretico comburendo, should be abolish'd. 1675 Approx. 17 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 5 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2004-05 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A48198 Wing L1682 ESTC R10913 12387027 ocm 12387027 60862

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A48198) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 60862) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 766:19) A letter to a member of Parliament with two discourses enclosed in it : I. the one shewing the reason why a law should pass to punish adultery with death, II. the other shewing the reasons why the writ, De hæretico comburendo, should be abolish'd. 8 p. s.n.], [London : 1675. Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.

eng Heresy. Adultery -- Early works to 1800. 2003-12 Assigned for keying and markup 2004-01 Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2004-02 Sampled and proofread 2004-02 Text and markup reviewed and edited 2004-04 Batch review (QC) and XML conversion

A LETTER TO A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.

WITH TWO DISCOURSES Enclosed in it.

I. The One shewing the Reason why a Law should pass to punish Adultery with Death.

II. The Other shewing the Reasons why the Writ, De Haeretico Comburendo, should be abolish'd.

Non partis studijs agimur, sed sumsimus arma Consilijs inimica tuis, ignavia fallax.

Printed Anno 1675.

The Publisher's Advertisement:

These Papers are made publick, not in Presumption to informe the Parliament; but only to give them an Occasion, to think of the Subjects they treat of, it being wholely unimaginable but that the United Wisdom of the NATION will find out better and other Reasons for the Establishment of the Things they propose.

My Dear Friend.

WHen I review alone the grand Entertainments of Learning, I used to meet with in your Conversation, the Wit of the Poets, the Reason of the Philosophers, your Excellent Observations upon the Actions of Persons illustrious in Arms, who have lived in the several Ages of the World, my Affliction is almost unimaginable to be separated from you: When you went up to the Parliament, there is nothing could have stay'd me (who can scarce be happy a Moment of my Life without you) behind you in the Country, but my Infirmity of Health, and a certain Desire of enjoying the Comfort and Pleasures of the Spring. You know, when we parted, how I conjur'd you alwayes to bear in Mind that grand Rule, Inter pericula libertatis aut veritatis silent amicitiae et inimicitiae, and then the Light of your own Mind will dispel and overcome the Darkness of others without Noise or Tumult: This World is govern'd by particular Hatreds and Friendships, not by the Reasons of Things; and there is nothing can keep you constant in your Integrity, but the having a perpetual Eye to that Rule. I also then told you, you should look abroad as well as at home, keeping your Eye on Forreign Affairs; for although Hannibal be not yet ad portas, Philip is at Olynthus. I have herein enclosed the Papers I promised you, in which I claim no Property against your absolute Power over them, do what you will with them: You know, the one contains a Discourse shewing the Reasons why Adultery should be Punished with Death; the other, why the Writ, De Haeretico comburendo, should be Abolished. Adultery, it is the greatest of all Thefts, a Theft of which no Restitution can be made, —Nulla reparabilis arte, Laesa pudicitia est, deperit illa semel.

Marriage of late hath been looked on as an Engin, a Toil to cath Mankind in; the Magistrate had need encourage it to prevent Depopulations: and to be alwayes secure and certain of our Wives, is in my Iudgment the best of Encouragements. As to the Abolishing the Writ, de Haeretico comburendo, you know I ever have had a Pitty & Charity for Mankind, acknowledging in all a Communion of Minds and Mortality, and particularly for those that dissent from me in Religion, Omnis animus veritate invitus privatur: No Beauty is so pleasant, so agreeable to the Eye as Truth is to the Soul; and all would love it, if they could discover it: As there is but one certain Existence of Things, so there is but one determinate Truth of them, the same to all Understandings, God's and Man's both. If after all my Search and Labour in Knowledge, I cannot discover a Beam of Truth to guide and lead me into an Unity of Mind with God, am I to be made a Criminal, and dealt with as a Malefactor? He is Infinite, and knows all Things; but my poor Understanding knows one Thing, and doubts of a Thousand: We are here in the Body tristi et obscuro Domicilio; and the inspired Apostle himself saith, we see darkly, and but through a Glass. God hath unfolded himself in as great Variety in the Minds of Men, as he hath done in the Material World: The Seed of Religion springs up variously in Human Souls, as we see the seminal Forms do out of the Earth; and would it not be Madness or Folly to destroy & cut up all Trees and Plants but the Oak? I am not without all Jealousie, that it is possible, we in England may return back again to the Church of Rome, not only because I see in History Monarchies more subject to Changes then Common-Wealths in Matters of Religion, and observe how indefatigable that Infallible Church (in its own Iudgment) is to revenge our Schism from it upon us, and so may weary us out at last, & how unsafe they apprehend themselves at Rome, while the Power of the Sea is in the Hands of Hereticks; but chiefly from the wild Philosophy and Atheism of the present Age, Atheism being a Preparation to receive any Colour or Tincture in Religion. I would have the Law of Burning of Hereticks repeal'd, lest we should see that Day. It is a Law Sanguinary with a Witness, written like Draco's in Characters of Blood, as barbarous as that of Ordeal, or Tryal by Battail, built upon no Reason, but upon a Self Opinion every Sect hath, that it hath a Monopoly of God to it self, and upon no Scripture I know of, but the Monkish Gloss, Haereticos de vita.

My Dear Friend, Although Gentlemen of fine Parts are sooner debauch'd in popular Assemblies under a Monarchy, then Men of plainer Wisdom; as Native Beauty is less subject to be tempted by others, then Beauty accompanied with the Ornaments of Art: I doubt not at all your Integrity in this Parliament, you are not a Man of fluttering Principles betwixt Kravery and Honesty, you will herd in your Vote with no Cabal, but go with the Squadron volante, as Reason upon every Debate appears to you; I know you account a Liberty of Judgment in an uninterested indifference of Mind without Fears or Hopes, a Grandeur and Excellence above the Rewards of Wealth from the Court, or of Fame from the People; nor am I afraid that amidst the Pleasure or Business of the City, you will depart from the Contemplative Life, but be alone with your own Mind, and drink of the Spring of Truth there, which overflowed so constantly your Conversations with me in the Country: Non Venus, aut vinum sublimia pectora fregit, Officiumve fori—

And, as for our Friendship, which has been a Communion of Minds & Fortunes for several Years, I have no Cloud, no Umbrage of Iealousie towards you. Friends in this World are not like Satyrs or Centaurs without real Existence, as Cardan under a Mel ncholy complains they are; I am sure I have found one which (as he sayes) he neve was so happy in his Life to do. I will detain you no longer from the Care of the publick Affa rs. I am Dearest Sr

April 17. 1675. Your most sincerely affectionate Friend.
A short Discourse why a Law should pass in England to punish Adultery with Death. Publicus assertor, vitiis suppressa levabo Pectora, vindictae quis que favete suae. Ovid.

IT will be necessary before I give my Reasons why such a Law should pass, that I do explain what Adultery is, the Notion of it being ordinarllly mistaken.

Adultery is the lying of a Single or Married Man with another Man's Wife, and not the lying of a Married Man with a Single Woman. Thus it was constantly apprehended among the Iews, to whom God gave the Law, Thou shalt not commit Adultery: And David's Sin was the taking the poor Man's Ewe Lamb from him, which lay in his Bosom, when he had Flocks enough of his own. I presume, there is none doubts the Christian Magistrates Power to make such a Law; Death is already amongst us the Penalty for less Crimes: We punish boldly with Death a Horse-stealer or a Cut-purse without any Scruple at all; and is not my Property in my Wife of dearer & nearer Concern to me, then my Horse, or a little Pocket-money?

The primary Law of Nature is the Observance of our Contracts; for indeed, without this there could be no Government: the State of Nature would still have continued; this Crime intrenches highly on this Law, dissolving the Family-Government; it is a Breach of the Solemnest Contract (entered into pro bono publico, Marriage being seminarium Reipubl.) imaginable: That is the Nature of the Crime, but the Magistrate is chiefly to concern himself in the Consequences of it; and they are more mischievous where the Woman breaks the Contract on her Part; for thereby a Spurious Issue that robs the Husband by wholesale of his Estate, of all his own and his Ancestors Acquisitions, is brought into his Family. The Crime is then a Complication of all the Wickedness in Lust, Breach of Faith and Robbery; And therefore I may justly infer that seeing Men equally concur with Women to transact it, they are justly equally punishable.

If a Man shall violate the Companion of the King, or the Companion of the Eldest Son and Heir of the King, it is high Treason: by this we see the Care of the Law, no Spurious Issue should inherit the Crown; should we not take some proportionable Care of our own Estates?

We may do well to reflect upon the Example of other Nations, as of the Iews (for many Ages the only known People of God) amongst whom Adultery was punished with Death, upon the Example of the Gentes moratiores among the Heathens; of the Athenians, who upon Solon's Law punished this Crime Capitally; of the Romans, who in Imitation of Solon's Law, set down for their Law in the 12 Tables, Moechum in adulterio deprehensum necato. Afterwards in the Roman State it was lawful for the Husband, until the Lex Iulia in Augustus his Time, Uxores in adulterio deprehensas sine judicio impune necare.

We may also consider what the Christian Church has done for the Suppression of this Sin: In the first and best Times of Christianity they did all they could (having not jus vitae ac necis) against it. The Pennance then for it was perpetual to the Hour of Death. Zepherynus Bishop of Rome, anno 216. moderated the Pennance, but the African Churches, and particularly the grand Tertullian opposed it as an Innovation.

The Ancyran Council, anno 315. ordains 7 Years Pennance for it. And the Council of Eliberis ordains, that he that commits Adultery again after Pennance for the First Fault, should not be taken into Communion at the Hour of Death.

In after Ages, when the Roman Church was resolved upon a Corlibacy in her Clergy, It was necessary the Sin should be looked on with a gentle Eye, & now it is dwindled down into a Peccadillo, but is in Truth like the Pecadillo of not believing in God at all; for if ever he gave a Law to Man, it is one to prohibit Adultery. Several of the Reformed Countries, who have recover'd themselves from under the Empire of Wit and Fraud over their Consciences by that Church, punish the Crime at this Day with Death.

As for us in England, our present Law is not without the Infusions of the Roman Church upon it in this Case; all the Remedy the injur'd Husband hath by our Law, is, to sue a Divorce in the Spiritual Court, and be cozen'd with a Sentence of Separation a Mensa & Thoro, a Crafty Invention against the plain Gospel.

If the Husband kill the Adulterer, or his Wife found by him in ipso actu, the Law excuseth him in this Case from Murder, but condemns him of Man-Slaughter, and hangs him if he cannot read; what a poor Remedy hath the Injur'd Man? If he kill the Adulterer deliberately, not provoakt by Ocular Demonstration, it is Murder. Besides all this, the present Law being so defective, the Crime grows upon it; 'tis common, and this Age gives it the soft and gentle French Names of Gallantry and Divertisement, in Apology for it: What ought the Magistrate to do in this Case, but to pursue this Crime as far as his Hand can reach, to the Grave it self, and then Expectet Deum Ultorem?

A short Discourse shewing the Reasons why the Writ, De Haeretico comburendo should be abolished. Chrysippus non dicit idem nec mite Thaletis Ingenium dulci que senex vicinus Hymeto. Juvenal. Paena errantis est doceri. Plato cited by Grotius.

BEfore I give my Reasons, it will be necessary to shew the State of the Law at present upon this Writ: Before the Sta •• te, 2 H. 4. cap. 15. No Person could be convict of Heresie, but by the Arch-Bishop and all the Clergy of the Province, but by that Statute any particular Bishop might in his Diocess convict of Heresie, and issue forth his Precept to the Sheriff to burn the Person he had convicted; a Law whereby the Clergy gain'd a Dominion over the Lives of the Subjects independent upon the Crown: it was repealed by the Stat. 25. H. 8. cap. 14. but so as particular Bishops may still convict; but without the Kings Writ, De Haeretico comburendo, first obtained, no Person convict can be put to Death; and so the Law stands at this Day.

My REASONS are these.

I. The Continuance of this Writ in force amongst us, is a standing Reproach to the Christian Religion we profess (a Religion of Love and Peace) If it be not to be propagated in the whole by Force and Bloodshed, certainly a Part of it as a particular Point of Faith in it, is not. In the Gospel of Christ all the Punishment of Heresie and of Infidelity it self, are adjourned over, and left to the other World.

II. If an Act pass to abolish this Writ, it will be an Act of Indulgence in part, and give an Assurance to all Persons of a different Iudgment from the present establisht Church, that they are secure as to their Lives under the Government.

III. If Popery should ever return back into England, there must a Parliament sit to repeal such an Act, before any Protestant for his Opinion could be put to Death.

IV. Such an Act would leave the Power of the present Church to convict, excommunicate and imprison Untouched only would take away their barbarous Execution of her Sentence.

If it be objected, the Writ is grown Obsolete and disused and so need not be taken away: The Answer is obvious; Not so obsolete neither: It was used in King Iames's Time; However, it's fit it should not remain as a Snare among our Law; for the Case concerns Life or Death: and the Papists use the Writ constantly against the Protestants; but they never against them.

FINIS.