I Do appoint Francis Smith, Thomas Basset, John Wright, Richard Chiswel and Samuel Heyrick, to Print this my Narrative and further Discovery of the Plot; And that no other Person presume to Print the same, nor any part thereof.

Robert Jenison.

THE NARRATIVE OF Robert Jenison, Of Grays-Inn, Esquire.

CONTAINING.

I. A further Discovery and Confirmation of the Late Horrid and Treasonable Popish Plot, against His Majestie's Person, Government, and the Protestant Religion.

II. The Names of the Four Ruffians, designed to have Murthered the King.

III. The Reasons why this Discovery hath been so long deferred, by the said Robert Jenison.

IV. An Order of His Majesty in Council touching the same. Together with other Material Passages, Letters, and Observations thereupon.

Together with A PREFACE Introductory to the said Narrative.

LONDON, Printed for F. Smith, T. Basset, J. Wright, R. Chiswel and S. Heyrick. MDCLXXIX.

To the Right Honourable, The EARL of SHAFTSBƲRY, Lord President of His Majestie's most Honourable Privy Council.

Right Honourable,

AS your Lordship is known to have been a Signal Instrument for the Re-Establishing his Majestie on the Throne of his Kingdoms, so your Zeal for the Preservation of the Protestant Religion, and of His Majestie's Person and Govern­ment, thus restored (in great part) by the Wisdom and Activity of your Honour's Counsel, may Justifie my Election, in Entitling your Lordship (before any other) to the Patronage of this Small Tract; Little indeed for Bulk, but, if I mistake not, considerable in its Ʋse, in regard it strengthens the former Disco­veries of Others, at such a Juncture of time, when some foyl and damp was endeavoured to be cast upon Them by the subtle Contrivances of the adverse Party. I have observed all along in the Progress of this matter, That when the Evidence for the King hath seemed to be at a Bay, as discouraged by the Power or Policy of Malevolent Persons, Then, by Divine Providence, another Witness hath started up to retreive and confirm, what before seemed to be at a Loss: Thus after the aspersions and prejudices cast on Mr. Oates, Mr. Bedlowe, and Mr. Dug­dale came in to assert and carry on the Truth of his Testimony (endeavoured to be shaken) by the addi­tion of their own: And when the matter seemed not fully to bear and to be made out, as to the Murther of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, then God raised up [Page 6]Mr. Praunce to make a plain Discovery of that Horrrid and Bloody Fact. Moreover, when at, and since the Tryal of Sir George Wakeman and the Rest (wherein I also appeared) some Discourage­ments, not yet fully enquired into, were cast upon the Witnesses for his Majestie, yet I was so far from being deterred by that (otherwise) disheartning Cir­cumstance, that I am rather animated thereby to pro­secute my Evidence with greater Vigour, as concei­ving it a Crisis, wherein Truth stands in need thereof; Neither do I doubt, but Others also may succeed me, with their seasonable Reliefs of this Kind, in case Falshood should make any further Attempt to over-ballance and weigh down the Truth; Which hope of Mine is in part verified already, by the ad­ditional Testimony of Mr. Smith, hereafter mentioned; And I am persuaded, that both His and Mine, will receive future Confirmation by the Astipulations of Others (at present not publickly known) if need shall require; That so it may be said of our Opposers, Though they will not see, yet they shall see, and be ashamed. I know your Lordship will allow me to use that Scriptural Expression, because the band of God (to those who seriously consider it) is more than ordinarily seen in these matters. That none of these Providences of the Almighty, may be Lost upon this Nation, but be mutually Improved, both by Prince and People, to an Humble Acknowledgment, and a Thankful Obedience, is the Prayer of

My Lord,
Your Honour's Most humble Servant, Robert Jenison.

THE Publisher to the Reader, Serving As an Introduction to the ensuing Narrative.

THE Name of Robert Jenison, Esq (the Author of the Narrative ensuing) hath been formerly mentioned in many Prints, especially in that Narrative of his Depositions, and Informations annexed thereunto, Collected by Charles Chetwind, Esquire, and published by Order of His Majestie's most Honourable Privy Council, July 16. last past, 1679. Besides, the Gentleman is further notified by his appearance, as a Witness for the King, in the late Tryal of Sir George Wakeman, Corker, and the rest. Nevertheless, because his Name was then used by others, though with his own con­sent, it is thought convenient in this Preface to the follow­ing Narrative, to give a more particular Account of Him, and of his Family, to which he hath already been, and fur­ther yet may be, so great an Honour; That so the unque­stionableness of his Extraction may advance him above the common exceptions of Lowness and Plebeity, which inferiour Testimonies are subject to. Born he was of an Ancient Family, residing at Wallworth in the County Palatine of Dur­ham: A place so considerable, that King James was pleased to Honour their Mansion-House (then in the possession of his Auncestors) with his Residence (and his Reti­nues) for a Night, Baker's Chron. in King James. at his first coming into England. His Father, John Jenison, Esquire, yet living in the same House, is a Gentleman of a fair Estate, and of an unblemished Reputation, save what may be thought to reflect upon him for his former adherence to the Romish Religion. His Elder Brother, Mr. Thomas Jeni­son, now a Prisoner in Newgate on the account of the Plot, [Page 8]having taken Orders in the Church of Rome, and in one of their most obnoxious Sodalities, That of the Jesuits, hath thereby rendred himself, according to the known Laws of England, uncapable to inherit: And thus, Divine Provi­dence so Ordering it, he hath opened a Door to this Gentle­man to the Inheritance of a fair paternal Estate, of several Hundreds by the Year; Which Consideration notwithstand­ing hath been so far from cancelling in him the natural Obligations to Brotherly Friendship, or to influence him in the least towards the making this Discovery; That in his Addresses to His Majestie on this Occasion, he hath, not with­out success, interceded for the Indempnity of his Brother, and of others of his Relations, as well as for his Own, as by the Order of Council inserted into this ensuing Narrative may appear. The Education of the aforesaid Mr. Robert Jenison of late years hath been in the Honourable Society of Grays-Inn, where his Pains have been commendably bestowed in the study of the Law, and his Repute untainted amongst the Prime Gentlemen, and all others; of that House. But his Youthful institution he received at Doway in Flanders, in the strict Principles of the Papal Religion, and in the English College of Secular Priests there, where, to give that Order of Seculars their due, I never heard him affirm, That he imbibed any Principles either of Immorality in point of Con­versation, or of Treasonableness in point of Loyalty, from their Information; Those Lessons being taught in the Schools of the Jesuits, who afterwards did labour to infuse some of them into him. The Seculars value themselves much on the accompt of their obedience to, or patient suffering under those Princes and Rulers (of a Contrary Religion to them) in whose Dominions they reside. Hence it is that formerly they persuaded those here in England of their own Sect and Profession to quiet subjection, fealty, and allegiance, in the days of Q. Elizabeth, contrary to the Principles, and Practices of the Jesuits, betwixt whom, ever since their first Institution, and the said Seculars, there hath always interceded an irre­concileable Pique: The former being, as an Episcopal Pro­testant hath lately character'd them, Fuller's Ch. Hist. Book 6. p. 279. The most active and Pragmatical Undertakers in all Christendom. But alas, This Censure is but [Page 9]a light Velitation, if compar'd with that black charge of guilt, which the Body of Seculars make against That Order and Society: He that reads the Quodlibets of William Watson, a Secular Priest, published in the Year 1602, will easily con­fess, That no Protestant Pen can decipher Jesuits in more dark and bloody Colours, than he hath done: For besides, the liberal Epithites he intersperseth in his Book, calling them, Mountebanks, Usurpers, False-hearted, Seditious, Impudent, Erro­nious, Turbulent, Malicious, &c. In his 5th Quodlibet, Art. 8. pa. 149. he hath these words, speaking of them, It is not unknown to all the Christian World, (as I verily think) That in Rome, in Spain, in Flanders, and every where, but especially here in England, Scotland, and Ireland, They labour to stir up all men under colour of Religion, and Zealous Desire in them, of our Country's Conversion against our Soveraign, the present State, &c. But more fully, in Quodlibet 3. Art. 3. p. 61, 62. he bestows his Favours on them, in these Expressions; They run now such a desperate Course, as if Religion were but a meer Political and Atheal Device, &c. taught by their Arch-Rabbies, how to maintain with Equivocations, Dissimulation, Detraction, Ambition, Sedition, Contention, Surfetting, sorer than ever did Heliogabalus (with his many hundred varieties of Services ser­ved in at every Banquet or Feast-Royal at his Table) in setting Division, breeding of Jealousie, and making of hostile Strife by op­position of King against King, State against State, Priest against Priest, Peer against Peer, Parent against Children, &c. raising of Rebellions, MURDERING OF PRINCES, &c. Are these Men then to be called Religious? &c. No, no, Their Course of life doth shew what their Study is; and that, howsoever they boast of their Perfections, Holiness, Meditations, and Exercises, yet their Platform is Heathenish, Tyrannical, Satanical, and able to set Aretine, Lucian, Machiavel, yea, and Don Lucifer in a sort to School, as impossible for him by all the Art he hath to besot men, as they do. Thus He. And though the same Watson, notwithstanding his Zealous Professions of Subjection to Temporal Princes, was afterwards put to death for Treason­able Practices against King James, whereby he might seem to stain the Credit of his own Doctrine formerly delivered; yet our Historians say, That he was out-witted therein too by the Jesuits, out of a Vindictiveness of spirit against him, [Page 10]for his plain demonstration of their odious Practises men­tioned in the asoresaid Book.

Hear what John Speed saith in his Chronicle, in King James, p. 1223. Watson having at large laid open, in Print, the Treachery, and Unsufferable Machinations of the Jesuitical Order, left this suspicion on them at his death, that They, in revenge, had covertly and cunningly drawn him into this Action, which brought him to this shameful End.

'Tis true, The great Favourers of Ignatius and his Fol­lowers, do look upon their Sect, as a Ne­cessary, Bussier. Floscul. Historiar. p. 386. 387. initii. and Seasonable Supply to the Roman Church, in regard it was instituted not many Years after the Assaults made against it, by Luther, To ballance the Protestants, the Jesuits were set on foot, as one of our own confesseth. Fuller's Church History. Book 6. p. 279.Melancthon, and their Partners.

Yea, Saunders in his Book De Schismate Anglicano, drives the Observation a little further, remarking it, as a spe­cial Providence, that the Order of Jesuits began to appear in the World, when all other Religious Orders of the Roman Communion were suppressed in England by King Henry the Eighth, Anno Dom. 1538. Nevertheless, some Grave and Sober Persons, even of the Roman Church, do, not without cause, suspect, that Their heady and rash Activity may in time contribute to the overthrow of that Religion, which They would seem strenuously to maintain; And we do rea­sonably hope, that the violent Humour of that sort of men may prove like the over-officious Duty of that Servant, who pretending to lift his Master up to Horse, threw him over on the other side.

But to return to Mr. Jenison: He, as I have said, being Educated in the Principles of the Romish Religion, continued constant in his adhesion thereunto; till about the Month of January last past. The chief occasion of his Conversion, was. The Confident Asseveration of Mr. Ireland, (who was his Kinsman) both at his Tryal and Execution, concerning [Page 11]his being in Staffordshire at the same time, when he knew him to be in London, and discoursed him there; upon which, he entertained such Thoughts in himself, That a Religion allowing such Palpable Untruths, in the very Article of Death, must needs be ill-grounded, besides the Counte­nance and Encouragement it gave to the Slaughter and Assassination of Princes; in order to which, he had been tamper'd with by the Jesuitical Party. These things did first shake his Stedfastness in that Profession, before ever he had Will or Inclination to read any Protestant Books; though since he hath been further confirmed in the truth of the Reformed Religion, by perusing some Writers, espe­cially the Bishop of Lincoln's Book, Entituled, Popery, or the Principles and Positions, approved by the Church of Rome, (where really believed and practised) are very dangerous to all, &c. Wherein he doth evidently prove those Doctrines to be maintained by the Church of Rome, which Mr. Jenison supposed to have been injuriously charged upon It before. Yet when he was in the Communion of the Roman Church, he had alwayes a secret Aversion to those King-Killing Maxims, which his Cousin Ireland and other Jesuits would have instilled into him. Hence it was, that they commu­nicated their Principles and Purposes to him, but gradually and guttatim, allowing him time to ruminate upon, and digest One Principle, before they attempted to infuse an­other. And the Consideration of those Principles, and his Conviction of the Evils of Them, hath proved, by God's Blessing, contrary to their expectation, a strong Induce­ment to the Discovery of their Vile Machinations and Practices.

If any shall Object, That the matters contained here in this ensuing Narrative, are but Crambe his cocta, or a repe­tition of what was discovered before; Let such know, That the Disclosing the Four Ruffians, who were designed to do so Black a Deed, is wholly due to Mr. Jenison's Infor­mations mentioned herein: For though other Evidences have concurred in the number of Four, and in their Desig­nation to that Bloody Fact; yet who they were, none hath nominated, but Himself: A Circumstance of that Mo­ment, [Page 12]that much of the Credibility of the whole Conspiracy doth depend thereupon. Besides, One and the same sub­ject may be cultivated by several Pens, according to the diversities of Style and Method, and their respective Know­ledges of different Occurrences relating to the same Argu­ment; which Variety doth not weary, but refresh the Reader; nor detract from, but corroborate former Evi­dences, especially His Majestie having declared his great Satisfaction which he received from this Testimony. And yet, This Theme is not so wholly drained, but that room is left, both for this Gentleman, and other Discoverers, to make their further Additions thereunto. And in the mean time, I question not, but the unprejudiced Reader will find his Expectation sufficiently answered in the Ensuing Narrative.

The Further INFORMATION OF Robert Jenison OF Grayes-Inn, Esq Taken upon Oath AUG. 6. 1679. be before me Edmund Warcupp, Esq one of His Majesties Justices of the Peace for the County of Middlesex.

THIS Informant saith, that after he had, upon much importunity of Mr. William Ireland upon the 19th day of August 1678. named unto him Cap­tain Levallyn, Mr. Kerney, Mr. Brahall, and Mr. James Wilson to be stout and couragious Gentlemen, as in this Informants for­mer Deposition is contained, the said William Ireland did ask or require this Informant to go down with the said Gentlemen to Windsor, to be assistant to them in the taking off the King, which this Informant refused, saying, he would not have any hand in the Death of the King, saying, No men of Estates would engage therein, as this Informant believed. And the said William Ireland did approve of the said four persons named as aforesaid by this Informant, as [Page 36]fit for the design: and declared, that he knew Mr. Levallyn, and Mr. Kerney, before this Informant had named them. By which, this Informant did apprehend, that he might have communicated with them of the said design for Windsor, before the nomination aforesaid. And this In­formant further saith, that upon the day that this Infor­mant receiv'd the 20 l. lent unto him, this Infor­mant, as in his former information is mentioned, went with his Brother to Mr. William Harcourt's Chamber in Duke-street, to return thanks for the obligation in con­senting to lend the money. And Mr. Thomas Jenison did let fall some expressions to the Purpose following, viz. If C. R. (meaning the King) would not be R. C. (mean­ing Roman Catholick) he should not be long C. R. mean­ing Carolus Rex: and further added upon discourse, that the King being deposed, he was no longer King, and it were no sin to take him off. And if it should be discovered who did it, per­haps two or three might dye for it; but denying the fact, the mat­ter would soon blow over. And he further saith, that much about the same time, discoursing of the design, wherein the greatest Catholicks in England were embarqued, the said Mr. Thomas Jenison did name my Lord Arundel of Warder, my Lord Bellasis, my Lord Powis, and two or three others, whose names this Informant does not now remember, that were to be great Instruments in promoting the Catho­lick Cause: and they had often attempted the Lord Irea­surer, and had at last made him theirs. And he further saith, that upon the 19th day of August 1678▪ aforesaid, Mr. William Ireland did ask this Informant for the 20. l. lent unto this Informant upon Bond, as aforesaid, although the same was not then due: and further said, he wanted 80. l. having then occasion for that summ; but this In­formant answered, that his allowance from his Father was but 80: l. per annum, and he could not spare much out of it. And he further saith, that the Commission which the said Tho. Jenison promised to obtain for him from the Duke of York, was delayed, and not to be sent unto him, until such time as the taking off the King was accomplished, as this Informant did understand from the said Thomas Je­nison. [Page 37]And this Informant knows, that Mr. Kerney and Mr. Coleman were well acquainted: and this Informant doth humbly beg pardon of His Majesty and the Kingdom, for concealing thus long the treasonable practices against his Sacred Life and Government and the Protestant Religion, which this Informant doth say, was occasioned, by rea­son, he, this Informant was unwilling to impeach his own Brother Mr. Tho. Jenison; and as unwilling to accuse himself, being descended of a Loyal family: but remorse of Conscience hath now prevailed upon him, to give the Ac­compts, contained in this and his former Informations, which with what shall further occurr to his memory upon Discourse with some, to whom this Informant commu­nicated formerly the same, this Informant will be ready upon all occasions to prove, for His Maiesties service. And further at present this Informant saith not.

THough the matters contained in the two Informations aforegoing, are so clear and evident, that they need no Paraphrase to explain them; yet I think fit, for my own, and the Readers satisfaction, to take notice of these Particulars following:

1. That my Informations, as well in this, as my former Narrative, are cantoned out into diminutive parcells, and not continued in an entire Webb, partly for relief of my memory, and partly, because my consent to these matters, being not voluntary, but in a sort constrained, I was the less solicitous to keep a methodical Register of them in my own mind: whereas, if I had been a Contriver, or at least, an active Consenter thereunto, I should have framed such an Idea of them within me, that the whole contexture, exhibited to publick view, would have appeared a conti­nued series of affairs, without any Chasme or interruption at all. My frequent breaks do sufficiently argue, I was so far from being a Grand Engineer in this matter, that I was, as unwillingly-willing drawn to the knowledge thereof: And when it was discovered to me, my conceal­ment, [Page 38]rather than my activity, was a great part of my guilt.

2. Besides the grounds formerly mentioned, quickning me to this discovery, I will not deny, but self-preservation had some influence upon me, to expedite the Discovery of the Four Ruffians, who were designed to have murdered the King; for a Gentleman of my acquaintance, having in­formed me the day after Sr. George Wakeman's Tryal, that one of those Four persons was come in to the Committee of the Council, had confessed his guilt, and upon hopes of Pardon, had proffered to discover his Accomplices: This wrought so far upon me, as knowing my self to have no­minated those Persons to Mr. Ireland, (though with some reluctancy, and being pressed thereunto by his frequent importunities) and being otherwise concerned in this affair, as far as I have herein mentioned; presuming also that His Discovery, if made, would reflect upon me, I was so far willing to provide for my own safety, (other motives also concurring) as to anticipate his feared Di­scovery, by making one of my own: which passage, though it savours of humane frailty and timidity in me, and therefore may seem to take off from the Honor of my Undertaking, yet I choose rather by this ingenuous con­fession to expose my self, than to conceal any minute or par­ticle of the Truth.

3. The particular discourse I had with Mr. Ireland, and our mutual Replyes and Rejoinders mentioned there­in, doth again occasion me to resume that pretty Fancy, which my Aunt and Niece above mentioned dandled in their own minds, and at last toss'd it to me; as if all were but an apparition or an illusive thing. What! was there ever any such man, as Mr. William Ireland? Were his Tryal, Condemnation and Suffering real things? Did ever any man see, or converse with him? If so, certainly I may put in for a share, and that at the time by me deposed. Must all things be resolved into meer Fancy? Is the whole World but an imaginary and inchanted thing? Do we live [Page 39]in the Region of K. Oberon, and his Fairies? Do we con­verse only with Ghosts, and combate Shadows? If such Do­ctrines as these may take place, it is to be feared, That Heaven and Hell will at length be judged but meer Phan­tasms of the same mould, until the latter come to be re­alized unto us, by our induring of its torments justly under­gone for our Sceptical and Atheistical incredulity. I speak this to the Generality of others, not in reference to my Aunt and Niece, whose superlative Zeal for the Credit of their own Religion, hath (I know) occasioned this Transport in them.

4. The particularity of that discourse, which alter­nately passed betwixt Mr. Ireland and my self upon the said 19th day of August 1678. mentioned in my Depositions aforesaid, will, I doubt not, raise up amazing considerati­ons in the Readers, when they shall recollect and compare Mr. Ireland's confident asseverations of his innocency at his death, and my discovery of his guilt, yea, he was the man, who then dealt most earnestly with me, (nay, he seemed more importunate than my own Brother at other times) to induce me to their purposes; we managed arguments pro and con; we gave Answers, and adapted replyes, and yet all this must be nought, but a scenical thing, and a meer delusion of the Fancy. Let us wholly resign our belief to blind impliciteness, if our own eyes and ears may not be trusted about their proper objects. For my part, I will not judge of any mans future estate, as to the eternity of another world; but certainly, it must be a great mistake, to go out of this, with an Untruth in ones mouth. I love to tread softly on the Graves of the deceased, and there­fore shall no further aggravate: only my desire is, that the consideration hereof may engage all private Christians (of what Perswasion soever) to look to the choice and sincerity of their Spiritual Guides. It was a remarkable saying of Sr. Thomas More, That he would not pin his Faith on another mans sleeve, because he did not know whither he would car­ry it: which, though urged by him against the Protestants, and worded, according to the facetiousness of his Wit, yet [Page 40]contains in it self an excellent Moral; To believe as the Church believes, and vice versâ, is a Circular arguing, bad in Logick, but worse in Divinity; for every man must be saved by his own Faith, and none can go to Heaven by a Proxy.

5. The Zeal of the Romanists for the propagation of their Opinions, (which is the womb both of all their for­mer, and present designs) ought, in my judgement, to be rather rectified than condemned; provided they ele­cted just and lawful methods, subservient to that end, for evil is not to be done, that good may come thereof. If Xavieres tra­vels to the remotest Indies, were only to promote the inte­rest of Religion, (by him judged to be the best) without a mixture of Jecular concerns, his Memory may come un­der a mild, (perhaps I might add, a laudable) censure. I know, 'tis very difficult to extirpate a deep rooted Cu­stome, and habituated opinions stick close by us, men are so hardly reclaimed from inbred superstitions, that they labour what they can, to propagate and promote them. Hinc illae lacrymae. We have a strange story in our Chronicles, which, as not altogether impertinent to the matter in hand, for the Readers divertisement, I shall here insert. King John, being vexed and oppressed by his Barons, sent a private message (deeds of darkness hate the light) to Admi­ralius Murmelius King of Morocco, Matth. Paris. then also enjoying a great part of Spain, (the messengers are named by the Historian, whereof one a Clergy-man. Strange! That Salt should lose its savour,) proffering upon condition of his aid and assistance, to resign his Kingdom to him, and to be­come his Tributary, (King John was well skilled in trucking of Kingdoms, having done the same to the Pope before) and withal to renounce the Christian, and receive the Mahometan Religion from Him, (the Vantage given in, was more worth than the bargain.) The Moorish Amin told the Embassadors, That he himself had lately been reading the Epi­stles of S. Paul, wherein he found many things that liked him well, only one thing he blamed in him, that he followed not that Reli­gion in which he was brought up; but for his part, he was so [Page 41]far from perswading him (our King John) to change his Religi­on, that if he himself had been without one, he would have chosen His: only he thought, it was every mans duty to persist in the Re­ligion under which he was born: And so in great dislike, dis­missed his Embassadors. I alledge this story, to denote the power and force of Custome, which is most tenaciously adhered unto in things of the mind. I know True Christi­ans have a better Rule; and that no Custome can justly pre­scribe to Christ and his Apostles, or the True Followers of them both, whose Doctrine ought to be the Standard, by which Ours is to be rectified and reformed. I shall not embarque in the particular Controversies, agitated be­twixt Rome and the Reformed, as being but lately initiated in their perusal: but thus much I have already learned, That no error and abuse ought to plead Antiquity for its privi­ledge: hoary hairs are no Crown, but when they are found in the way of righteousness: but by lawful Authority grievances of this nature may be rectified; and that in a corrupt state of Ecclesiastical affairs, and a separation therefrom, 'tis not he that taketh, but that administreth the occasion, who is the true and proper Schismatick. But to return;

6. My Brother Thomas Jenison's activity in these affairs, comes next to be taken notice of, as far as I have been necessitated to bring him on the stage. Here, I confess, I have great tenderness: for though he communicated many things to me, yet I was loth to discover them till the very last; and not then neither, till upon assurance of Indempnity for Him as well as my self. I was here once in wavering circumstances, and somewhat divided be­twixt hope and fear, being willing to save my own Bro­ther, yet not to endanger the Father of my Countrey; but at last the best scale weighed down the other, having this consideration cast into it, That the safety of my Brother, Self or Family, were not worthy to be named the same day with that of His Majesties. The particular Method which I took to save my Brother harmless, though I knew him to be so guilty as I have declared, I shall not scruple to subjoin. First of all, I presented a Petition to His Maiesty [Page 42]against the single Testimony of Mr. Oates, then his only Accuser, (of which intimation is given before) it being indeed indited out of pure Zeal for my Brothers preser­vation. Finding little advantage thereby, the Sunday be­fore the Order of Council for both our Indempnities, (to be mentioned by and by) was obtained, I went to some Lords of the Council, and had assurance from Them, in the Name of His Majesty, that my Brother and other Re­lations should not be prejudiced by my Informations; be­fore which encouragement, neither of my Two Informa­tions were given in, but purposely suspended till such assurance given: after which, a private Council was called on purpose to receive them, to whom they were accordingly presented. The Lords having also given a promise before, That at the sitting of the next full Coun­cil, effectual Orders should be obtained from the Board, for the full ascertaining of the said Indempnities; which pro­mise the Noble Lords concerned, were pleased punctually to perform, to my great and signal encouragement. The Copy of the said Order follows.

AT THE COURT AT Hampton Court, This 7th Day of August 1679.

Present
  • The Kings Most Excellent Majesty,
  • Lord Arch-Bishop of Canter­bury,
  • Lord Chancellor,
  • Lord President,
  • Duke of Monmouth,
  • Duke of Lauderdale,
  • Marquess of Worcester,
  • Earl of Bridgewater,
  • Earl of Sunderland,
  • Earl of Essex.
  • Earl of Bath,
  • Earl of Hallifax,
  • Earl of Radnor,
  • Viscount Fauconberge,
  • Lord Cavendish,
  • Mr. Secretary Coventry,
  • Mr. Chancellor of the Ex­chequer,
  • Sr. William Temple,
  • Mr. Powle.

RObert Jenison of Grayes-Inn, Gent. this day attending His Majesty in Council, to make very considerable Discoveries in relation to this Horrid and Damnable Popish Plot, against His Majesty and the Government, and fearing that what he should now, or hereafter declare, would prejudice his Father, his Brother, his Sisters, and one Mr. John Smith; His Majesty, for his greater encouragement to proceed in so good a work, was pleased to Declare, That whatever he should at this, or any other time, in the course of his said Evidence reveal, which may any way touch or relate to any of his said Relations, should not be made use of to their prejudice upon any Account whatsoever; But that His Majesty would take some Order (with the Advice of His Council) for [Page 44]the Indempnifying of the said Persons therein. And was fur­ther pleased to declare, That if the said Persons, or any of them, should come in, and discover their Knowledge also of these matters, That He would grant unto them, or any of them, as full and ample a Pardon, as the said Robert Jenison himself should now have, or that any others have, or ought to have had, for their Discoveries of this matter. And he would take the said Robert Jenison into His Royal Protection. And was further pleased to order, That a Memorial of this Decla­ration be entred in the Register of the Council Causes, for the more Publick and ample Manifestation thereof.

This is a true Copy of the above Declaration, remaining in the Council Office in my Custody this 13th day of August 1679.

Thomas Dolman.

THough a Text Royal, (such I esteem an Order of his Maje­sty in Council to be) is a Comment to it self; I mean doth sufficiently illustrate and honour the subject it dilates upon, yet, 1. I should be guilty of great Ingratitude, a Crime ab­horrent to my Nature, if I should not thankfully accept his Majesty's Grace and Favour, and publish my Obligations there­upon to the whole world; for thereby, of one obnoxious to his Laws, and in the Eye thereof, an Enemy to his person, in concealing the Treasonable actings of others, besides the guil­ty accession of my own Crime, as far as I have before ac­knowledged, I am restored and rendred to be Rectus in Curia, and further incouraged by his Royal Protection to pay him the greatest service and duty I am able to perform.

2. And the truth is, there is some necessity of more than ordinary Protection to all concerned in these Discoveries; for the confluence of Papists to this Town, notwithstanding his Ma­jesty's Proclamations to the contrary, giveth opportunity to so many Cabals, that his Majesty's Witnesses are in continual danger, which makes some persons (and those not inconsiderable) rather to conceal what they know, at present, than to expose them­selves to restless Adversaries, who have so great a mind to vent their malice on all those who are Instruments in crossing their Designs: It is wittily said by One of the Jesuits, Fuller's Ch. Hist. That they never owe ill will to any man, because they usually make present payment thereof; yea they sometimes antidate their punishment, to pre­vent their feared and fore-judged harms. I will not deny but this consideration had some influence also on me to retard my discoveries, especially knowing that the Jesuits have revengeful Instruments enough at their command, and no man in himself is of so vile and abject a life, but if Satan let loose the reins to malice, he may be Master of another mans. Hence it is, that Assassinations and Murders are more frequent in Popish Coun­tries, than I hope by Gods goodness and his Majesty's Justice; they will ever happen to be in This, though our late times have afforded too many Instances thereof. But having con­quered this difficulty in my self, my loytering and remisness before, will now cause me to make the more haste, as he who goes backward, doth it to take the greater leap.

3. The insertion of my Father's (and of my other Relati­ons) Names into this Order of Indemnity was desired by me ex abundantii cautela, for it having (with probability of truth) [Page 46]been affirmed, that there were few considerable Papists in Eng­land, but were acquainted with the Plot, and knowing our Family to be in that List, I was loth to hazard his safety to any malicious Romanist, who, by the Reason of his embracing the Protestant Religion, might enviously accuse him, of what he is not guilty; otherwise he was not at all concerned, save in what he heard from me, viz. part of that discourse betwixt Mr. Ireland and my self, mentioned in my Letter to Mr. Bowes, formerly printed, and that was in dark and obscure terms, and applicable several ways, which caused him to give less heed thereunto.

4. The Clause encouraging me to further Discovery, I chearfully embrace, resolving to make use of it in convenient time, for at a Council held on Thursday, August the 28th, at White-Hall, I declared that I had further Matter to charge some of the Ruffians withall, but in regard I sought the destruction of none, I moved rather for a Proclamation to be issued, al­lowing them forty days time to come in, with promise of In­demnity, in case they would discover; which being accord­ingly granted by His Majesty's Clemency, and shortly to be published, I judged it conducing to His Majesty's service to su­percede my Evidence till that time be expired. The same Ex­cuse I plead for some other reservations, which a little time may make more seasonable.

5. Next to the great Obligation that lyes upon me, by his Majesty's most Gracious Disposition, expressed in the aforesaid Order, to proceed in this service; I find no little satisfaction and comfort, that my Father is not only pleased to approve of what I have done pursuant thereto, but also to oblige me to Constancy and Diligence for the future in performing my Duty therein by his express Command.

I think it may be satisfactory to the Reader in the next place to insert two Letters directed to me by Mr. Smith, formerly Confessor to my Father, and Resident in his Family, which will serve in some measure to satisfie the World, that what I have given in Evidence concerning this matter, does not pro­ceed from any new or late Suggestions or Inventions of my own, but are delivered according to the truth of Fact, as it has formerly come to my knowledge.

Mr. John Smith, Late a Romish Priest, his Letter to his Cousin Robert Jenison, Esquire.

Co. Jenison.

I Have received your last Depositions, whereby I was truly satisfied, and likewise your Father, who gives you his Blessing, and twice his Bles­sing, for discovering more if you can. What you have said in your Informations, you have ob­scurely heretofore intimated to me, in which I am willing to justifie your just Proceedings against those Popish Emissaries.

I remain
Your Affectionate Cousin and Servant, John Smith.

POSTSCRIPT.

ACcording to your next Letter I shall inform you of all you have said to me, I have it all in Writing, and efficacious to the proving of a Damnable Plot (though you told it me in very obscure terms) but, blessed be God, you prove, as I believed, a Loyal Subject: And for what you have done, I will venture my life against any Papist in your justification.

Pray discover what Papist Gentry you can, and learn what you can of your Brother.

All the Papists in the Country will do you and I all the pre­judice they can: Act you the part of a Royalist, and I will the part of a Defender.

Vera Copia.

Tho. Dolman.

Mr. John Smith, Late a Romish Priest, his other Letter to his Cousin Robert Jenison, Esquire.

Dear Cousin.

I Have had and heard from you, in Obscure Terms, that which made me believe you had some knowledge of the Plot; and that Ireland and your Brother were not only tampering with you, but also endeavouring to entice and in­duce you thereunto, as now I find by your Depositions up­on Oath; your often Discourses and Disputations about the Wolvish Jesuits (as I often termed them to you) and their Acti­ons, pro and con, and sometimes passionately, argued in my Opinion you to be one of their Votaries, yet with a remorse of Conscience, as I often perceived by your now and then change of colour, caused me to make a short Contraction of our Sayings and Discourses assoon as we left off, all which I have by me ready to produce; they are material, and will un­doubtedly fortifie and strengthen not only your Evidence against those Traytors and Jesuitical and Pharisaical Blood-suck­ers, but also satisfie the whole world how legally and deser­vedly they have suffered, how inhumanely and beastially (though Jesuitical like) they dyed, how your now proceed­ings and Depositions are not groundless or malicious, as many would have them, but true, just, and legal, how your understanding and quick apprehension of my often saying to you, that the Obedience of a Subject to his King, is in­violable and cannot be dissolv'd, and how well and religiously you pondered this general Duty, enjoined upon all men by God himself, that is to eschew evil and do good, especially in the Allegiance of a Subject unto his Soveraign, (a duty so often commanded by Scripture) so that by the well observing or villifying of it, not only a Kingdom, but a King, a sacred person, is soon preserved or destroyed; the Evil then which a Subject is to eschew in respect of his Soveraign, is not only in Action, but also in Words and Cogitations; the good he is to do out of Obedience and in true Allegiance, is not only to pay Tribute unto his Soveraign for his Regal support, but [Page 49]also fighting his Battels with Joab, adventuring his life with David, and revealing with religious Mordecai, all treasonable Designs and Attempts, to pour out Prayers and Supplications for his welfare and safety, to esteem and honour him from the Heart and out of Conscience, as the Anointed of the Lord. Thus are all Subjects commanded by the old and new Law, to honour, serve, preserve, and obey their King, and not to lay violent hands on his Sacred Person, but to succour and de­fend him with the hazard of their lives, notwithstanding the Pope's arrogant presumptive Power (and Antichristian Doctrine) in discharging all Subjects from their Allegiance, absolving them from their Oaths of Obedience, and giving them Li­cense to bear Arms, and offer violence to their King (a most Licentious, Impious, Irreligious and Diabolical Principle) contrary not only to the Laws of the Kingdom, as you may find in Bracton's Customs of England (he was Lord Chief Ju­stice under King Henry the Third) Freemen and Servants are subject unto his Power, as also whatsoever is under him, & ipse sub nullo, nisi sub deo, no man then ought to presume to exa­mine his doings, much less to oppose them by force or vio­lence; it is contrary to the Law of God also, where it is said, Where the Word of a King is, there is Power, and who may say unto him, What dost thou? This Power is given by God who counselleth, To keep the King's Commandments, and that in regard of the Oath of God, for he doth whatsoever pleaseth him. An evident Testimony, that no mortal man, whether Pope or Priest, have, or ought to have, either Power or Supe­riority over a King; as you may see further how St. Paul com­manded every Soul to be subject to the higher Powers, Rom. 18. he acknowledged himself subject unto Caesar; and no won­der when Christ himself paid unto him Tribute, and confes­sed one of Caesar's subordinate Magistrates, Pilate, to have Power over him, and that given from above, John 19. St. Peter likewise writing to his Fellow Presbyters, whom he exhor­eth to feed the Flock of God, that they would submit themselves unto the King as unto the Superiour, 1 Pet. 5.2. 1 Pet. 2.5. Chry­sostom says, The Office of a Priest is only to reprove, and freely to admonish, and not to move Arms, Sedition, or Rebellion, nor to use Bucklers, nor to shake a Lance, but only to argue, and freely admonish. Tertullian, speaking of Kings, says, Inde illis est [Page 50]potestas, unde spiritus; thence have they their Power, whence their Spirits. Irenaeus saith, cujus jussu nascunter homines, ejus jussu constituuntur principes; by whose appointment they are born Men, by his appointment are they made Princes, and not by the Pope's, who were in former times both elected and deposed by Emperours and Kings, and no wonder, when the High Priests themselves were subject unto Kings, and punished by Kings for their Offences, 1 Sam. 22. 1 King. 5. 1. King. 2. Optatus saith, There is not any man above the Empe­rour. Chrisostom saith, No man is equal to him upon Earth. St. Cyril and Agapetus affirm the same. Pelagius, the first Roman Bishop of that name, wrote these words unto Childebert, King of France, With how great study and labour are we to strive, that for the removing the scandal of suspicion, we may minister the obse­quiousness of our Confession unto Kings, unto whom the holy Scripture commandeth us to be subject (this not five hundred years af­ter Christ.) Gregory the Great, Bishop of Rome, confessed, That Power was given from above unto the Emperour above all men; and further saith, I being subject unto your Command, not out of feigned Humility, but out of Conscience and Duty, &c. Otho, the Emperour, deposed John the 22th for his impure and vitious life. Therefore, Dear Cousin, let this and your own experience not only satisfie you of the Papal Infallibility and Ʋsurped Power, but also move you to recollect your Me­mory, as to the enlargement of your Evidence; not only a­gainst those Jesuitical Wolves and Pope's Emissaries, but like­wise against all other Traytors and Malefactors in this Hellish Plot concerned to your knowledge; and assure your self that I will assist you with all that you have (as I may well say under a Jesuitical Vaile) related to me, whereby I hope you may remember more than I have seen in your last De­position, by this means, and no other, you may recover your lost Credit, serve your King and Country, and hope for the Blessing of God and your Father, who obliges you, upon the duty of a Son, to inform all you can, and against all you can: My affectionate good wishes and Prayers shall be for ever for your welfare and safety. I am, dear Cousin,

Your Affectionate Cousin, and ready Servant, John Smith.

Let me hear from you as soon as you can.

Note, That His Majesty, upon the perusal of the first of the said Letters, thought fit that the Original should be left in the Custody of one of the Clerks of the Council, with Directi­ons, That an Authentick Copy thereof should be delivered to me: But the Original of the second is yet in my Cu­stody.

Robert Jenison.

If, in the second Letter, too much Gall seem mingled with the Ink, and some bitter Expressions contained therein, it may be alledged in Excuse, That long before Mr. Smith was born, Censures more severe have passed on the Jesuits, and that by Members of the Roman Communion. Watson's Quodlibet 9. Art. 10. calls their Government Antichristian, Tartarian, Turcical, and Tyranical, and their Doctrine about it, Paradoxal, Pragma­tical, and Stratagemical. Besides, I know Mr. Smith to be of such Excellent Morals, and of so poized and just a temper, that 'tis hard to transport him to extremes: So that those Expres­sions seem to be extorted from him out of a just detestation of their late cruel Designs; and if the Jesuits did often hear such Reproofs, and submit themselves to be regulated thereby, it might be hoped that their Parts and Abilities would contribute to the setling and establishment of Kingdoms, and not to the destruction and ruine of them.

ADVERTISMENT.

THE Reader is desired to take notice, That there are many material things more that are not convenient at present to publish, with such confirming proofs of what is herein before set forth, as will satisfie all the World, how deep this horrid Conspiracy hath been laid, and carried on, for de­struction of his Majesty's Person (whom God preserve) and the Government.

FINIS.

ERRATA.

PAge 30. line 38. for had not read had he not, p. 34. l. 3. for granted and full read granted out and full, p. 38. Paragraph 3. l. 4. for Aunt and Neece read Aunt and Cousin, p. 39. l. 9. for Aunt and Neece read Aunt and Cousin, p. 45. l. ult. for abun­dantii read abundanti.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.