Dr. Hammond's brief resolution of that grand case of conscience (necessary for these times) concerning the allegiance due to a prince ejected by force out of his kingdoms; and how far the subjects may comply with a present usurped power. — Brief resolution of that grand case of conscience.

Dr. Hammond's brief resolution of that grand case of conscience (necessary for these times) concerning the allegiance due to a prince ejected by force out of his kingdoms; and how far the subjects may comply with a present usurped power. — Brief resolution of that grand case of conscience.

Table of contents

Dr. Hammond's brief Resolution of that Grand Case of Conscience, (necessary for these Times) concerning the Allegiance due to a Prince ejected by Force out of his Kingdoms; and how far the Subjects may comply with a present Usurped Power.

Question.

Answer.

[Page]

Dr. Hammond's brief Resolution of that Grand Case of Conscience, (necessary for these Times) concerning the Allegiance due to a Prince ejected by Force out of his Kingdoms; and how far the Subjects may comply with a present Usurped Power.

Question.

DOth not Victory give a Right to the Conquercur?

And doth it not thence follow, that he which is ejected out of his Kingdom, by Force of a prevailing Party, hath thereby lost his Right of Allegiance from his former Subjects?

And is not then that Right devolved on the Conquerour, by the force of these words of God, when he saith, Dan. 4. 17. and 25. 32. That he ruleth in the Kingdoms of Men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of Men? And of Ecclus. 10. 8. because of Unrighteousness the Kingdom is translated from one People to another?

And when he doth so, are not all Members of such a Kingdom obliged (as the Israelites in their Deportation to Babylon) to yield Obedience to the Conquerour?

Answer.

This Objection consists of divers Branches, and I shall answer it by degr [...]es.

1. That all Victory doth not give a Right to the Conquerour, but onely when the War being founded on a just Cause, that just Cause hath [...] with Victory. And when that is, depends wholly on the truth of that Quetion, concerning the Lawfulness of any War.

Now [...] there can never be just War on the Subjects part against their [...] they want the Warrart of Supr [...]me Authority, without which (though the Cause should be never so just, and the [Page] End never so good,) all the Blood that is shed, is no better than Murther: Therefore though the Subjects in such a War should prevail against their Sovereign, yet neither is he hereby divested of his just Right, nor they invested therewith, because the War was wholly unjust on their part, for want of Authority.

2. Therefore if that Party whose Cause is Unjust, shall yet prevail, and prove successfull, then in answer to the second Branch, I say, that there is no Right acquired by this: For, 'tis a mistake to think that this is the meaning of Jus Victoriae, the Right of Victory, which the Civil Lawyers speak of, as if God had by this lottery testified his Judgment of the Right, and pronounced that Just now, which was Unjust before; or that the present Force is always to be looked on as the Higher Powers, and allowed the Obedience required by the Apostle, as due to them, which is the mistaking of [...], Power, for [...], Authority, and agrees with that speech of the Atheists, Wis. 2. Our strength is the Law of Justice, and that which is feeble is found to be nothing worth. And we know 'tis Gods ordinary dispensation now under the Gospel to permit Violence to oppress the Godly, which sure is no Argument that those prosperous Ungodly, have the sole Right to the Possessions of the World, or that the opprest Godly Man, shall no longer be thought to be opprest, when the prosperous Oppressour, is arrived at the height of his oppression.

3. The Question then being removed from the Title of Force, (which being itself unjust, cannot confer Right on any,) It must next be consider'd, what Dedition (that is, yielding or resigning up of one's Right) can doe. That will be of two sorts; either of the Prince, or the People; and again, either Voluntary or Involuntary.

A Voluntary Dedition, or yielding up, of the rightfull Possessor, if he be a private Man, transfers a Right: But a Prince, being a publick Person, and having an obligation of Protection to his Subjects, cannot without some breach of that Obligation, abdicate his Kingdom, nor consequently voluntarily yield up his Power; or if he do, he cannot transfer the Right to any, (save to the lawful Heir or Successor,) without the tacit or express Consent of the People also.

But in case they consent also, then will his Right (in Kingdoms Elective) be transferred by the joint yielding of the King and his Subjects. As for Kingdoms hereditary, the Subjects Consent is not necessary; but the King's yielding up of his Right alone, is sufficient to transfer the Right to the next Heir. Neither can the joint Act both of King [Page] and People, transfer this Right, from the next Heir, to any other. The King's yielding is an Absolution of the Subjects from the Allegiance formerly due to him by them, and so makes it lawfull for them to yield the same to another; and when 'tis thus free and lawfull to them, the Intervention of their own Act also becomes Obligation on them to submit to that Person so yielded to. And when this is done (in Kingdoms Elective) and withall when no Heir is left to make Claim, or the Claim is relinquish'd by the right Heir, (in Kingdoms hereditary,) then is the Kingdom removed, (and given by God, who now rules not immediately among us, as he did in the time of the Theocracy among the Jews, but is then said to remove a Kingdom, when his Providence so disposes, that by the Laws, and Right among Men, it is removed,) to another.

But till this be done, i. e. till He, or They, in whom the Right both of present Possession, and future Claim by Inheritance, is truly vested, do voluntarily yield up that Right, and when that is done, till they which by their yielding, are freed from their former Bands, do now by their own Act enter, into new, what Force soever there be, and how successfull soever the Force be, there is not thereby any such Victory compleated, as shall be able to confer Right on the Victor, nor remove it from him that hath, and still protests his Right, though as yet he be not strong enough to vindicate it.

4. But then in the next place, if there be a Dedition, or yielding up by the King, and that Dedition involuntary; that is, such as nothing but the present Success of the Force hath inclined him to, then certainly doth it not so divest him of his Right, as that it shall be unlawfull for him when he can, to make Claim, and recover it again. As he that by a violent Invader is made to swear to pay such a Summ of Money, it is acknowledged lawfull for him to implead that Thief, and recover from him, what in performance of that involuntary Oath he hath paid him.

In this case the difficulty is, What Condition those Subjects are lest in for that time, betwixt the involuntary Dedition of the King, and his renewing of his Claim; and the Solution must be, That a Proportion be observed between the Act of the King, and the Subjects consequent Act: The Act of the King is but a present Dedition, and doth not oblige him never to make any farther Claim again; and consequently this gives not any such Absolution to the Subjects, as that they may doe any thing which shall prejudice that After-Claim, or blemish his Royalty, [Page] such as are taking new Oaths of Allegiance, Abjurations of him and his Issue, Engagements to the Usurped Power, &c. All that it can doe, is to make it free for them to submit to such other things, of an inferiour nature, (which includes not any such blemishment of Rights of the lawfull Prince,) provided that they acknowledge not the lawfulness of the present usurped Power, nor act as Ministers or Instruments thereof. This is the utmost that seems possible to determine in this matter.

5. As for that Power which Tract of Time may be thought to have in this business, that is not considerable, where the Claim is continued, (for that argues the Dedition involuntary,) and much less, when there is no Dedition at all; for there 'twas before supposed, that Force cannot conser Right.

6. And if by this stating of the Case it follow, that the Lot of the faithfull Subjects must be very unhappy at this time, and that great Disorder must necessarily continue in such a broken Kingdom, as long as the Contention between the violent Usurper and the just Owner thus remains undecided. I answer: That this is oft the Lot of the most pious Men under the Gospel, who have their good things here mixt with Tribulations, and must content themselves in the solaces of a good Concience, in performing those Duties which cost them dearest, and expect their full payment of joys without hardships, to be paid them in another World.

THE END.

[Page]

Information about this book

Title statement

Dr. Hammond's brief resolution of that grand case of conscience (necessary for these times) concerning the allegiance due to a prince ejected by force out of his kingdoms; and how far the subjects may comply with a present usurped power.Brief resolution of that grand case of conscience.

Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660.

Edition statement

1689

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2006-06 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A45399

ID [STC]

Wing H517

ID [STC]

ESTC R218875

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

99830429

ID [PROQUEST]

99830429

ID [VID]

34880

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A45399)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 34880)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2091:13)

Source

— Dr. Hammond's brief resolution of that grand case of conscience (necessary for these times) concerning the allegiance due to a prince ejected by force out of his kingdoms; and how far the subjects may comply with a present usurped power., Brief resolution of that grand case of conscience., Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660..

Extent

4 p.

s.n.,. [London :: 1689?]. (Caption title.) (Place and date of publication from Wing.) (Attributed by Wing to Henry Hammond, however the text apparently refers to King James II and King William III, while Henry Hammond, D.D., died in 1660.) (Reproduction of the original in the John Rylands University Library, Manchester University, Manchester, England.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.