OF the Five Senses, Two are usually, and most properly called the Senses of Learning, as being most capable of receiving communication of Thoughts and Notions by se­lected Signes; And these are Hearing and Seeing.

The Object of Hearing is Sound, whose variety is so great, and con­veighance so easie, that it brings in admirable store of intelligence and information to the common sense. And like to it in the same respects is the Object of Seeing.

Either of these learned Senses have their peculiar Priviledges: whereas Seeing requires Light, and a free Medium, and a right Line to the objects; we can hear in the dark, Immured, and by curve Lines, that is, Sound can pass to the Ears, where visual Rayes cannot to the Eye. But then, Sight takes in at a greater distance, and more variety at once, comprehending also Quiescent objects, which Hearing does not: and especially injoying the de­lightful variety of formes, and [Page 3]figures, which come not to the Hearing. As to the present pur­pose, both these Senses embrace their Objects at greater distance, with more variety, and with a more curious discrimination, than the other Senses, so that they are most fitted to receive and di­stinguish Signes for Communica­tion, and by their proper ad­vantages mutually supplying the defects of either. And both to­gether serve completely for the Reception and Communication of Learned Knowledge.

Now Signes for Communica­tion may be contrived at plea­sure from any variety of Objects (especially of one kind) apper­taining to either Sense. For ex­ample, Four Bells admit Twenty four changes in Ringing, and [Page 4]Five Bells One hundred and twenty: each change may, by a­greement and consent, have a cer­tain signification imposed upon it, and so Communication may be performed at a distance by Hear­ing. And for the Sight, Four or Five Torches held up at a Distance in the Night, 1 or 2, or 3, or 4, and any, or more of them eleva­ted, or depressed out of their Or­der, either in Breadth, or Long­ways, may by agreement give great variety of Notifications. And thus, Thousands of Signes may be invented and agreed up­on, and learnt, and practised. Thus the Drum and Trumpet by their several Sounds, serve for many kinds of Advertisements in Mili­tary affairs: and Bells serve to proclaim a scare-fire, and (in [Page 5]some places) Water-Breaches; The departure of a Man, Wo­man, or Child; time of Divine Service; The hour of the day; day of the Moneth, &c. Com­mon life is full of this kind of significant Expressions, by Knock­ing, Beckoning, Frowning, Point­ing and the like; and Dumb persons are sagacious in the use of them. And even Brute Ani­mals make use of this artificial way of making divers motions to have several significations, to Call, Warne, Chide, Cherish, Threaten, &c. especially within their own kinds. But of all other, there is none for this use compa­rable to the variety of instruct­ive Expressions by Speech, where­with Man alone is endowed, as with an Instrument suitable to [Page 6]the Excellency of his Soul, for the most easie, speedy, certain, full communication of the Infi­nite variety of his Thoughts, by the ready Commerce between the Tongue and the Ear. And if some Animals, as Parrots, Magpies, &c. may seem to be capable of the same discriminations, yet we see, that their souls are too narrow to use so great an Engine. The chief, I say, of all signes, and which the Almighty's Providence, in the Creation of Man, indued him withall, and destin'd to that use, is Humane voice and the seve­ral modifications thereof by the Organs of Speech, viz. the Let­ters of the Alphabet, formed by the several Motions of the Mouth; and the great variety of Syllables composed of Letters, and form'd [Page 7]with almost equal velocity; and the endless number of words capa­ble of being framed out of the Alphabet, either of more sylla­bles, or of one; or sometimes of a single Letter, according as, by consent and institution, they are ordered to signifie the several parts of Speech or Language. And (which answers to the same end) the Characters or Symbols of these Letters expressed by Writing, or Printing, or Graving, &c. so as to remain visible, and discernable by the Eye; viz. to each Letter a proper Character designed to signifie the Power or Sound of the Letter, that when I see Letters joyned, I under­stand the sound, and am ready to pronounce it. And this is Lan­guage in Counterfeit. Whereas [Page 8]Language, originally and pro­perly (as the Word imports) is that of the Tongue, directed to the Ear by Speaking. Written Language is tralatitiously so cal­led, because it is made to repre­sent to the Eye the same Letters and Words, which are pronounc­ed.

And by these the Tongue and Pen doe mutually correspond, and assist one another, Writing what we speak, and Speaking what we write. And (as was said of the Senses, to which they serve) they supply the defects of each other by the peculiar priviledges of ei­ther. Swift, and ready, and famili­ar Communication is made by Speech, and when animated by Elocution, it acquires a greater life, and energie, ravishing and [Page 9]captivating the Hearers. But then, Speech is confined to the Living, and imparted to onely those, that are in presence, and is transient and gone. Written Language, as it is more Operous, so it is more digested, and is permanent, and it reacheth the absent, and poste­rity, and by it we speak after we are dead.

Now, as I said, the Original of these Signes for Communication is found in Viva voce, in spoken Language, and therefore 'tis Speech we now chiefly consider, I mean the Principles thereof, which are Letters. Now these Letters consi­dered, as to their Genesis, i. e. as they are made and fram'd by seve­ral Motions of the parts of the Mouth, are the natural Elements of Speech, but the use of them is Ar­tificial, [Page 10]viz. when they are compo­sed, and designed by several Signs of Respective Notions: And hence Languages arise, when by institution and agreement, such a composure of Letters, i. e. such a Word is intended to signifie such a certain thing. And the Learning of a Language is (or at least needs be) nothing else, but the inform­ing our selves, and remembring what Composures of Letters are, by consent and Institution, to signifie such certain Notions of things, with their Modalities and Accidents: I say, the Motions of the Mouth (speaking largely) by which the voice is discriminated, and the Sound thereof in distinct formes received by the Ear, ac­cording to the number of their variety, are the Natural Elements [Page 11]of Speech; and the Application of them in their several compo­sitions, or Words made of them, to signifie things or the Moda­lities of things, and so serve for communication of Notions, is Ar­tificial.

And the former of these, the Letters, as they have the natural Production by the several checks or stops, or (as they are usually called) Articulations of the Breath or Voice in their passage from the Larynx through the Mouth or Nose, made by the instruments of Speech, are the subject of this present Essay. Worthy indeed of better consideration, as being the first Elements of all Humane Learn­ing, (to say nothing of the Propa­gation and Conservation there­of;) and by which having once [Page 12]surveyed the true and proper na­tural Alphabet, we may easily dis­cover the Deviations from it in the Characters thereof, in all the Al­phabets in use: Either by Defect of single Characters of Letters; or by Confusion of them; or by expressing the Power of single Letters by unapt Compositions; or by an absurd reception of dou­ble Letters, into the number of the Elements, which ought to be onely single and original; or last­ly by the incongruous pronun­ciations of several Letters, as they lie described to the Eye by Sym­bols or Characters of the Alpha­bet of several Languages, which indeed ought to be only one, or at least all to be perfectly corre­spondent each to other, accord­ing to their Origine in nature, [Page 13]though expressed by several Cha­racters, after the humour and fan­cy of several Nations. Though it were much to be wished, that, as there is but one single way (where­of we are now treating) of the na­tural production of Letters, where­by to convey our thoughts by the sound of Speech to the Ears of them that hear us; so there were throughout the world but one sort of Character for each Let­ter, to express it to the Eye, and that exactly proportioned to the Natural Alphabet formed in the Mouth. This, though diversity of Languages continue, yet would render them much more easie to be learned, as to reading and pro­nouncing of them, and especially as to the Writing of them, which now, as they stand, we find to be [Page 14]troublesome and difficult, and it is no small part of Grammar, which treats of Orthography and right pronunciation.

And truly the Disorder, into which the Alphabet is put, by the several ways fore-mentioned, seems to me of the same kind, though not so great, as if seve­ral Nations, using the same Cha­racters, should apply them differ­ently, and that Sound, which one describes by B, another should do the same by C. &c. which by private consent hath been some­times used in dangerous times, onely to obscure their writing, and make it hard to be read by others not acquainted with the in­trigue, but is quite contrary to a­ny intention of advancing the fa­cility of Learning.

But the chief design here in­tended by this accompt of the Natural Alphabet, is, to prepare a more easie and expedite way to instruct such as are Deaf and Dumb, and Dumb onely by con­sequence of their want of Hear­ing, (by shewing them the pro­per figures of the motions of the Organs, whereby Letters are fra­med) to be able to pronounce all Letters, and Syllables, and Words, and in a good measure to discern them by the Eye, when pro­nounced by another.

And although this cannot be directly and immediately taught, and learnt, as to every particular Letter of the Alphabet (as will be sufficiently manifest in the en­sueing discourse) yet He, who has this exact knowledge of the [Page 16]Nature and Difference of Let­ters, by knowing withal, what can be readily done, and what cannot be immediately perform­ed; will be able to pursue such an attempt with steadiness; and having made his first progress in what is obvious and fesible; will then (without expence of fruit­less labour) proceed to seek out and invent other ways to com­pass about and accomplish his de­signed effect.

And by these wayes (as I my self have made some experiment) it is not impossible, no nor very difficult to be done, even in those who were born Deaf and Dumb.

By what has bin premised, we may define Language (if we con­sider it more materially) to be An apt Connexion of Letters, [Page 17]forming and producing Words and Sentences. But if we consider it more according to the Reason and Design thereof, then Lan­guage is the most excellent Instru­ment for Communication. Or, a connexion of the apt signes for Communication of our Thoughts and Notions. And Speaking is no­thing else, than A sensible Expres­sion and Communication of the Notions of the Mind by several Discriminations of utterance of voice, used as Signes i. e. having, by Consent, several determinate significancies.

The Matter or Store, out of which these signes are framed, is the Alphabet, that is, the variety of single different Letters, which Letters arise from the first ori­ginal discriminations of voice, by [Page 18]way of Articulation, whereby the Ear is able to judge and ob­serve the differences of vocal Sounds. And as many such diffe­rent sounds as can be made by sin­gle Articulations, so many Letters there are in the store-house of Nature, out of which to frame Signes for Communication by way of Speech or Language.

I said, Articulation, because there may be other ways of dis­criminating the voice, E. G. by Acuteness and Gravity, the several degrees of rising and falling from one Tone or Note to another; and the several Kinds of Mea­sures, Passions, Moods, Ayre, &c. out of which it were easie to frame a kind of Language, with­out Words, though not so Ex­pedite nor Comprehensive as the other.

Now to describe accurately the differences, by which the Formal Reason of every letter is constituted, however it seem at the first apprehension familiar and ea­sie, and no one but can say some­thing towards it; yet upon better consideration will be found very difficult: Because the Motions and Figures within the mouth are abstruse, annd not easie to be di­stinguished, especially those of the Tongue, and several parts of it, which is moved, through the help of many Muscles, so easily, and Habitually, and variously, that we are scarce able to give a judgement and description of divers Motions and Figures thereby framed in the Mouth: And also because most are apt to seek all the Differences of Let­ters [Page 20]in those Articulating Moti­ons, whereas several Combinati­ons of Letters are framed by the very same Motions of those Or­gans, which are commonly ob­served, and are differenced (as shall be shewn) by other con­current causes. And lastly, by reason of the Prepossession of the Judgement of most men from their Infant-breeding, of which I have met with much Experi­ence; and it may be seen in the writings of some Learned men, who coming to treat of the Na­ture of Letters, speak of them by Tradition, as of some remote exotick thing, whereof we had no knowledge, but by uncertain fabulous relations. And although I have bin told of some more accurate Authors, who take not [Page 21]the vulgar Alphabets and Rudi­ments of Grammar for their Ca­non; yet I have refrained to look into them, for fear of being led away by other men's fancies; whereas I rather chose to con­sult Nature at Hand. And here­in I cannot hope to have escaped all prejudicies of fancy, but do willingly submit those mistakes, into which I may have fallen, to the better consideration of o­thers, who shall have made re­search into this business with more felicity. And certainly the free thoughts of many separate persons using diligence herein, compared together, select choice being made of the most happy adventures in each of their seve­ral Hypotheses, is the surest way to advance this kind of Essay to a [Page 22]good perfection. To which, if any thing be contributed by this that I have done, I shall not wholly have missed my end.

Of Letters the Material part is Breath and Voice; the Formal part is constituted by the Motions and Figures of the Organs of Speech, affecting the Breath or Voice with a peculiar sound, by which each Letter is discriminated. For either of these there are proper Organs. For the Former, the Lungs, Aspera Arteria, Larynx, Ʋvula, Nose, and the whole Arch of the Palate or Roof of the Mouth. The Lungs are as Bel­lows, which supply a force of Breath: the Asphera Arteria is as the nose of Bellows, or as a chan­nel in the sound Board of an Organ, to collect and conveigh the [Page 23]Breath, and somewhat more, by a power of contracting and dila­ting it self, which those have not.

The Larynx both gives passage to the Breath, and also, as often as we please, by the force of Muscles, to bear the sides of the Larynx stiffe and near toge­ther, as the Breath passeth through the Rimula, makes a vibration of those Cartilaginous Bodies which forms that Breath, into a Vocal sound or Voice, which by the Palate, as a Chelis or shell of a Lute, is sweetened and augment­ed. The Ʋvula, as a Valve, o­pens and shuts the passage of Breath or Voice through the Nose. The Nose, sometimes gi­ving passage to Breath or Voice, in speaking alters their sound, [Page 24]and gives a Material discrimina­tion, by which the general sound of Breath or Voice may be di­stinguished into Oral, or Nasall, or, (to speak more accurately) Ore-Nasal. And thus also the Whole mouth, as it gives passage to Breath and Voyce, and a di­stinct sound, from that of the Nose, ought to be accompted one of the Organs of the Material part of Letters.

By the way observe, that Let­ters may be framed by Articu­lation of onely Breath, for secret communication near at hand, as in whispering. But the most useful way of easie and free communi­cation, being by the Voyce, and the Motions being the same in whispering and in speaking, it is in­tended here, to consider vocal [Page 25]Speech alone, as that to which this Discourse refers. Though it be true (and ought to be well heeded) that divers letters have no Vocal sound, if pronounced alone, but do immediately affect the vocal sound of other Letters, to which they are joyned in Spech, by affecting first the Breath in their own proper Motions and Figures, such are F. S, and some others. The Organs of the Later, the Formal part of Letters, are the Tongue, Palate, Goums, Jaw, Teeth, Lips. Of which the Tongue and under-Lip, and nether-jaw are moveable. The rest are immovea­ble, viz. as to their use in speech. Articulations are made by the Mo­tions of the moveable Organs to, or towards the Immoveable. As, the Tongue, (which is the [Page 26]chief instrument of Speech) is eve­ry way moved in its parts to and from all parts of the Palate, and Goums, and upper Teeth, except the very cavity or Arch of the Pa­late, which is always kept open to help the sound. The under lip is moved to the upper lip, or upper Teeth. And these motions are attended by the motions of the nether-jaw.

• Of Letters
  • The Mate­rial Cause is Breath and Voice whole Organs are the
    • Oral.
    • Nasal.
      • Lungs.
      • Aspera Arteria.
      • Larynx.
      • Palat's Arch, or Roofe.
      • Uvula.
      • Nose.
      • Whole mouth.
  • The Formal Cause is Atticulation of Breath and Voice whose Organs are
    • Moveable.
      • Tongue.
      • Under Lip.
      • Nether Jaw.
    • Immoveable.
      • Palat.
      • Goums.
      • Upper-Lip.
      • Upper Teeth,

In the framing of every Letter, there is an Articulation (though [Page 27]not to every Letter a several Ar­ticulation; for sometimes two or three have the same, and are differenced onely by their mate­rial causes.) By Articulation I mean a peculiar Motion and Fi­gure of some parts belonging to the Mouth between the Throat and Lips, whereof some are more easie to be discerned and describ­ed; as those made with the Lips, P. B. M: with the Lip and Teeth, F.V: with the Tongue and Teeth, [...] i. e. th. dh. and those with the Tongue and Goums, and Tongue and Palate, which are close stop­ped, as T. D. N; KG. NG. The rest are more difficult, and most of all the Vowels, where there are peculiar Figures of the Cavi­ty of the Mouth, between the Tongue and the Arch of the [Page 28]Palate, whilst the Tongue moves into a Posture required to each Vowel, which is made without the Lips.

That I may be the easier un­derstood, I do comply with the Antients, in distinguishing Letters into Vowels and Consonants; yet not wholly upon their reason, viz. That a Vowel may be sound­ed alone, a Consonant not with­out a Vowel; which if examined will not be found all true, for many of the Consonants may be sounded alone, and some joyned together, without a Vowel, as Bl, St; and as we pronounce the later Syllable of People, Rifle, &c. though it be true of some Con­sonants, as the Mutes, P. T. K. that they can make no sound a­lone: But from another differ­ence, [Page 29]which is, That in all Vow­els the passage of the mouth is open and free, without any ap­pulse of an Organ of Speech to another: But in all Consonants, there is an Appulse of the Or­gans, sometimes (if you abstract the Consonants from the Vowels) wholly precluding all sound; and in all of them, more or less, check­ing and abating it.

Now from hence ariseth the facility of joyning a Consonant to a Vowel, because from an Ap­pulse to no Appulse (or an Ap­perture) is easier, (because the Motion is not half so much,) than from one Appulse to ano­ther. And we find in the Moti­ons from one Appulse to another, in joyning of Consonants, some (according to their easier aptness [Page 30]of Notion, or nearness of Nature or situation) to be readyer and easier joyned in one syllable, than others: Which made that obser­vation of the Grammarians, of the easie pronunciation of a Mute be­fore a Liquid, which do not there­fore necessarily make the Prece­ding Vowel, by position, long in Quantity, as Patrem.

The Distinction of Articulation of Breath and the Articulation of Voice must be well heeded, be­cause in it consists the onely dif­ference of many Letters, as shall be shewn. For it is one thing, to Breath, or give an Impulse to breath alone; another thing, to vocalize that breath, i. e. in its passage through the Larynx to give it the sound of Humane Voyce. As through a Horne or [Page 31]Cornet, or Trumpet, you may, if you please, emit onely Breath without any other sound than of wind; or you may with the same Breath, regularly blown, raise the proper voice or sound of those Instruments. Breath then must be understood distinctly from Breath vocalized, or Hu­mane voice, and either of them in their distinct Beings and Sounds may be, and are Articulated by the Motions of the Organs.

Now, though several single Let­ters nakedly considered, are found to be Articulations onely of Spi­rit or Breath, and not of Breath vocalized (as appears if you pronounce S. F. &c. abstract­ed from all vowels) yet there is that property in all Letters, of Aptness to be conjoyned in Syl­lables [Page 32]and Words, through the vo­luble motions of the Organs from one stop or figure to another, that they modify and discriminate the Voice without appearing to discontinue it. And so Letters may well enough be termed Ar­ticulations of Voice in respect of Speech, which yet in their own simple abstracted Nature are but Articulations of Breath.

To come now nearer to our Inquiry into the Production of Letters, we are first to in­vestigate the variety of Moti­ons, and Figures, made by the Organs, which serve for Articu­lation. And then the Variety of Matter, to which those Articu­lations are severally applyed. For it will be found, that the same Articulation makes Impressions [Page 33]of different sounds, or (which is the same) Letters, according as the subject matter, which is to be Articulated, is different: as one and the same Seal, imprinted up­on several pieces of wax of dif­ferent colours, as Yellow, Red, Green, Black, will make so ma­ny distinct signs (if significati­ons be imposed upon them) to the Eye, as there are different Colours in the Matter, or Wax, which receive the same Impres­sion. Thus the same Articulation; if of Breath, makes one letter; if of Breath vocalized, or voice, another; If of voice Nasall (i.e. when the Ʋvula is opened, and the voice passeth into the Mouth, and is there Articulated, and at the same time hath a free pas­sage through the Nose) then it [Page 34]makes another; and lastly, if of Breath Nasal, then another. Thus the Matter of Sound, which is to be discriminated by Articulation, if it be of four kinds, Spirital, Vocal, Naso-spirital, Naso-vocal, (it is for shortness-sake, that I do not stile them more accurately, viz. Ore-Spirital, Ore-Nasal, Ore-Naso-Spiri­tal, Ore-Naso-Vocal;) then every Ar­ticulation may produce four Let­ters. But the design of Speaking, being to Communicate our Thoughts, by ready, easie, and graceful Pronunci-ation, all kind of Letters have been searched out, that were serviceable for the pur­pose, as Commodious Elements of Speech, and such discriminations as were not so, whereof many may be found, (all Articulations not suiting with all matter) they were left out and laid aside.

All Articulation is made with­in the mouth, from the Throat to the Lips inclusively, and is dif­ferenced partly by the Organs and several parts of Organs (al­ready described) used in it; and partly by the manner and de­gree of Articulating: which later is, either by Appulse, i. e. when one of the moveable Organs toucheth, and rests upon some of those, that are Immoveable; Or else onely by inclination of the moveable Organ to the immovea­ble, without Appulse, the passage through the mouth remaining free and open. If there be no Appulse of one Organ to another, the Letters by other several postures and inclinations of the Organs are vowels. But when there is an Appulse of one Organ to ano­ther, [Page 36]the Letters, which are so framed, are Consonants. Again, the Appulse is either plenary and occluse, so as wholly to preclude all passage of Breath or Voice through the mouth; or else parti­al and pervious, so as to give them some passage out of the mouth: and this later affects the Sound di­vers ways, giving it a Lisping, or Hissing, or else emitting it smooth, or else jarring.

The nature of Consonants be­ing framed by Appulse, is (as was said before) much easier to be discerned, than that of the Vowels. I shall therefore indeavour, first to describe their differences, and how they are framed; taking the number of Consonants, not from the Grammatical Alphabets of any Language, but from the diversity [Page 37]of Sounds framed by single Arti­culations with Appulse, which I find in any usage; especially in our, and neighbouring Nations, such as are most needful for any among us, that are Deaf and Dumb, to learn. And thus they ordinarily amount to 19. besides 2 or 3 more (to be spoken of in their place) which will be found among the Vowels: omitting some other uneasie Letters, which I shall after describe, and possi­bly may be in use with some Nations.

If a close Appulse be made by the Lips, viz. by the Under-Lip, to the Upper-Lip, then is framed P, or B, or M; if it be made by the end of the Tongue to the Goums, T. or. D. or N. If by the Bosse of the Tongue to the [Page 38]Palate, near the Throat, then K. or G. or N^ĝ. so there are 9 Con­sonants made by close Appulse, and they evidently answer one an­other in their Properties; whe­ther you compare them in re­spect of the Organs, the 3 Labial B. P. M. are Parallel to the 3 Gingival T. D. N, and to the 3 Palatick K. G. N^ĝ; or whether in respect of Sound; P. T. K. are Ar­ticulations of Breath; B. D. G. (if you compare B to P; D to T; and G to K;) are made with the very same Appulse and Motion of the Organ; and are differenc­ed onely by being Articulations of Voice, or Breath vocalized: which is easily discerned, if you strive to pronounce P. abstracted without a Vowel, then it will be wholly Mute, because it is no­thing [Page 39]but Breath stopt: but if you in the same manner go to pronounce B, there will be a murmuring sound of the Voice, formed in the Larynx, and passing till it be stopt by the Appulse of the Lips. And so of the rest.

M.is an Articulation of voice, by close Appulse of the Lips; so far perfectly the same with B: but there is this difference added, that at the same time, passage is open­ed for the Voice through the Nose. And the like is N. in the Goums, and N^ĝ in the Palat. Thus in respect of Appulse of Or­gan P. B. M. are the same; and T. D. N. and K. G. N^ĝ. In respect of matter of sound P. T. K. do perfectly agree, and likewise B. D. G. and M. N. N^g'. And in re­spect of the manner, viz. Close­ness [Page 40]of the Appulse, they all agree. And these 3 properties sufficient­ly discover the Nature of these 9 Consonants, and therewithal, how properly N^ĝ is ranged amongst Original letters.

The other sort of Appulse is partial and pervious, giving some passage to Breath and Voice: of which kind, Two are made to the upper Teeth, and cause a Lisp­ing sound, the Breath being strein­ed through the Teeth. One whereof is of the under Lip to the upper Teeth, which, if Breath onely pass, makes F. but if the [Page 41]Breath be vocalized, the same Appulse makes V. Another is of the Tongue to the upper Teeth, and in like manner with the form­er, makes Th, and Dh. or θ. ϑ, which so justly correspond with F. and V. and are made by single pro­per motions of the Organ, that they must needs be acknowledg­ed Letters, and not to be com­pounded of T and H, or D and H, but require to be described by single proper Characters, as well as other Letters. I would de­scribe them by θ and ϑ.

And thus far the nature of these 13 Consonants lies fair to be per­ceived, because the Appulse is so manifest, being either close, as in the former 9; or Bold and forward to the Teeth, as the other 4.

Next, there is a Partial Pervi­ous [Page 42]Appulse of the End of the Tongue to the Goums, giving the Breath a streight pasiage there, by which a hissing sound is made; the sides of the Tongue at the same time resting firmly on the side-Teeth. And by this, if Breath alone pass, is made the Letter S; but if Breath vocalized, then the posture and motion makes Z. Again, the end of the Tongue born more downwards, and the middle of it born up nearer the Palate, the sides resting on the Teeth, makes, if the Breath pass, Sh, or, if Breath vocalized, Zh. which is properly that, which is designed by J consonant, as For­reiners pronounce it. The Figures in the mouth of Zh. and the vowel I, are much alike, which might give occasion of supplying Zh. by [Page 43]the character of J Consonant: And the vowel I, partaking also of the nature of a Consonant, added to Z, comes very near to the sound of Zh, as Zya; but this hath some­thing more of Gingival Figure in it.

Thus we have 17 Consonants, which bear a certain Analogie; out of which, if you take M. N. Ng, there remain seven pairs, of which each Letter hath the very same motion and Appulse of the Organs, with his compeer, and differ onely in relation to sound, one being an Articulation of Breath, the other of Voice, and they stand thus And these

in Whispering, cannot be distin­guished, except by prejudice of Fancy; but every pair will be the same without any difference, and [Page 44]consequently but one Letter. So that the Language of Whispering is perform'd with 7 Consonants fewer, than the Language of Speak­ing. And I might digresse to tell, how some of the Antients may be thought sometime to have u­sed a less number of Letters in their Languages; as may be pro­ved by the celebration of those, who added to their Alphabet, by inventing or bringing other Letters, than they used.

And for the other 3 Letters M. N. Ng. though they make not such pairs as the other 14, yet they are within the observation of not differing by Motion or Po­sture from the other close Letters of the same Organs, but onely by Sound; the Voice passing through the Nose, as hath been said. And [Page 45]it were easie to add a Nasal Let­ter to each of the other pair of Lisping and Sibilant Letters, but they are found not to be so grace­fully pronounced, nor sufficient­ly discriminated in Pervious Ap­pulses, where the Breath hath pas­sage through the Mouth and Nose both at once; but onely in the Appulses, which are Oc­cluse; where the voice is stopt, and onely murmures within the Mouth, and passeth freely by the Nose. And this is the reason, there are but 3 Nasal Letters common­ly in use, because there are but 3 occluse Appulses. And here it is remarkable, that in the framing of these 17 Consonants, there are but 7 different Motions or Po­stures of the Organs; and con­sequently but 7 Discriminations [Page 46]arising from thence, which are be­tween the 7 pairs before spoken of, each pair from the other, in such order as they are there set down.

I shall adde one Remark more concerning these Consonants, That, whereas I have sometimes in discourse, put many several persons to consider what the dif­ference might be in any Pair of them, as between P, and B; T, and D, &c. And upon tryal they have been ready to fancy, (and I have met with it in the Writings of some) that the difference lies in the manner of Appulse, one being made by a Fuller or Ranker Ap­pulse than the other, or, some such thing, which they thought they perceived, but could not well express. The Truth is, There may [Page 47]be some such little difference, but from another cause consequenti­al to that which is already assign­ed, which is this: All Tuneable Sounds, whereof Humane voice is one, are made by a regular vibration of the sonorous body, and Undulation of the Air, pro­portionable to the Acuteness or Gravity of the Tone. Now Breath flowing in a smooth stream from the Lungs through the Mouth; and Voice from the Larynx in a curled vibrated Figure, it may very well be, that Breath voca­lized, i. e. vibrated or undulated, may in a different manner affect the Lips, or Tongue, or Palate (while they stop or check it) and impress a swift tremulous moti­on, which Breath alone passing smooth, does not. And so we may [Page 48]feel within our Mouth, some dif­ference between P and B. which yet is not sufficient to distinguish them to the Ear of another per­son; nor of it self to constitute them distinct Letters of the Al­phabet; but they are distinguish­ed by the Sound made by that Vibration.

There remain two odd Con­sonants, which have no fellows, nor stand in pairs, and those are L and R; both of them Gingival in respect of the Appulse of the Organs. L is made by the same Appulse of the end of the Tongue to the Goums, as are T and D; but then the Sides or edges of the Tongue are drawn in, and leave smooth and free lateral passage for the voice, i. e. by the sides of the mouth, or one of them at [Page 49]least. You may easily perceive it, if you pronounce L. after, or before T. Lt. Tl. where you keep the end of the Tongue still in the very same posture in both Let­ters, and onely move the sides of it.

R is made by a Pervious Ap­pulse of the end of the Tongue, with its edge to the Goums, the Tongue being held in that po­sture, onely by the force of the Geneoglosse, or Myleoglosse Muscles, and not resting any where up­on the Teeth; except onely touching them loosely, so as to close the passage of Breath every where by the sides, and conduct it to the end of the Tongue, And this with a strong Impulse of Breath vocalized, so as to cause a trembling and vibration of the [Page 50]whole Tongue; which vibration being slow, does not tune the voice, but make it jarre; the Tongue not resting, but making a light Appulse in parts of the end of it, and being born stiffely, as with a Spring, by the Muscles, (especial­ly by the Geneoglosse) and agi­tated by strong impulse of Breath. And it is observable, that in all the other Consonants, the Moveable Organ rests and bears somewhat strongly upon the Immoveable; as is evident in all the 9 Letters made by close Appulse, and in the Four Dental Letters, and in L, and lastly in the Four Sibi­lants; some of which last being of nearest Appulse to R, will shew this better by being compared together; e. g. Z. and R. In Z. the Tongue bears firme upon the [Page 51]upper side-Teeth, and so the end of it being a little flatted, is born steadily near the Goums, making a Rimula, by which the hissing sound is produced, the steadiness of the posture of the Tongue resisting that tremulous vibration, which it suffers in pro­nouncing R. But in R. the Tongue does not rest or bear as aforesaid, but is held stifly in its whole length by the force of the Muscles, so as when the impulse of Breath strikes upon the end of the Tongue, where it finds passage, it shakes and agitates the whole Tongue, whereby the sound is affected with a trembling jarre. And this is the cause, why they, whose Muscles are weak or flac­cid, are unapt to pronounce this Letter R.

Now, as before I gave a Scheme of the Occluse Consonants with their differences, so I shall here add one of those, which are Pervious, and then all together.

[Page 53]

Thus every of these Conso­nants may be differenced and de­fined by these three respects, 1. Sound or Matter. 2. Appulse of Organ. 3. Manner of Appulse. e. g. B. is Vocal, Labial, Occluse; T. is Spirital, Gingival, Occluse; F. is Spirital, Labiodental, Pervi­ous; [Page 54]ous; and the rest in like man­ner.

It will give much light to what hath hitherto been spoken concern­ing Consonants, to take a better view of what has been already hint­ed, and to lay this Hypothesis; viz. That the number of Letters in Nature, is equal to the number of Articulations, severally apply­ed to every distinct matter of Sound. The Articulations of Con­sonants, i. e. the different motions and postures of the Organs of Speech, by which they are form­ed (though possibly more may be found) I suppose to be 9, where­of I have described 7 in 17 Con­sonants, and added those of L and R. Now let Breath alone, in the Mouth, be first Articulated by these, there will be 9 Consonants, [Page 55]P. T. K. F. Th. S. Sh. L'. R'. Se­condly, vocalize the Breath, and make the same Articulations, there will again be 9 more differences of sound, and will make the Con­sonants B.D.G.V.Dh.Z.Zh.L.R. Thirdly, make the same Articu­lations again, and let the voice pass through the Nose, and there will be 9 differences more, which will make M. N. Ng. V. Dh. Z. Zh. L. R, if the last six be spo­ken through the Nose, in such manner as we hear it done by those, who (through an ill habit, or by an ill constitution or corro­sion of the Ʋvula or Valve, which opens and shuts the passage of Breath to the Nose) are said to speak in the Head, or Snoch. Last­ly let Breath onely in like manner pass through the Nose, and have [Page 56]the same Articulations, and there will be nine more different sound­ed Letters, which I cannot di­scribe, but with Characters be­fore used, viz. M'. N'. Ng'. F'. Th'. S'. Sh'. L'. R'. Thus there will be by one Primary, joyn'd severally with Four Secondary differences, four times Nine Consonants, viz. 9. Spirital, 9. Vocal, 9 Naso-Spirit­al, and 9. Naso-Vocal; in all, 36.

But finding no necessity of so many, (since Languages are va­rious enough, and copious with those in use;) and withal, that the 6 Naso-Vocal Letters, which are made by pervious Appulse, are not easie nor graceful to pro­nounce, we reject them, and re­tein onely the Use of the other 3. which are by close Appulse, [Page 57]and are facile and graceful, viz. M. N. N^ĝ. And for the same rea­son we much more exclude 6 of the Naso-Spiritals, viz. those made by pervious Appulse. And for the other 3. though some Na­tions possibly may take the pains to pronounce them, (especially the last of them, formed in the Pa­late, N^ĝ. which perhaps may be the Genuin sound of the Hebrew ע) yet being found harsh and trou­blesome, they are more general­ly disused, whilst most Nations rather study to sweeten and soft­en their Pronunciation, and to that end are more ready to change or leave out in their Compositi­ons of words, and Conjugations, and words, borrowed from other Languages, such Letters, as less suit with easie Pronunciation.

Again, it falls out, that L. and R. being in extreams, one of Roughtness, the other of Smooth­ness and freeness of Vocality, are not easie, in tract of Vocal speech, to be pronounced spiritally, as are P. T. F. S. &c. but are apt to get a tincture of Vocal sound, (which you will perceive, if you try to pronounce L'a, or R'a, with L and R spirital;) or else with striving to avoid it to become too Guttural; and therefore obtain not a distinct Character, and place in the Al­phabet, as Articulations of Breath: Though we meet possibly with something of this nature in the Welch pronunciation of L, and the Greek of R. And when amongst them we find LL as in LLoyd, &c. or ῤῥ ἐῤῥενον we may conceive one of each pronounced Spirital­ly, [Page 59]the other Vocally. But in at­tempting to pronounce these two Consonants, as likewise the Nasals, and some of the vowels Spiritally, the Throat is brought to labour, and it makes that which we call a Guttural pronunciation.

Thus out of 4 times 9. i. e. 36. casting out as useless (or at best, inconvenient and needless) 9 Na­so-Spiritals, 6 Naso-Vocals, and 2 Spiritals, there remain, as proper Elements of Language, 19 Con­sonants such as are before de­scribed. And if they do not all go in equal and parallel Combi­nations, you see the reason of it. And where some Nations may be found to have a peculiar Gut­tural or Nasal smatch in their Lan­guage, it will be found also, that they labour to retain in their [Page 60]pronunciation (though perhaps not expressed in their Alphabets) some of those Letters, whose use is more generally rejected. And I, not being able to know the di­stinct usages in all Languages, do not hold my self obliged by the design of this Essay, to accomo­date an Alphabet to them all, but think it sufficient in this fol­lowing Scheme, to lay down all possible Consonants, that we know of in nature; (not to speak now of one stop, whichmay be made in the Larynx, of Breath, be­fore it comes to the Tongue and Palat;) leaving it to every ones pleasure, upon their experience of forrein usages, to select out of this common stock more Letters than I do, and remove the Obelisks, which are intended for marks of [Page 61]rejection of those Letters, to which they are prefixed. I have not in this Scheme of these 9 Quaterni­ons of Consonants, Distinct known Characters, whereby to express them, but must repeat the same, presupposing those differ­ences of Pronunciation already described.

In this minute devious subject, I have been necessitated to ex­plain my self in more words, than to some Few may seem needful: For their sakes therefore, I will in [Page 63]a short review, sum up what has hitherto been said.

Language is a Connexion of Audible signes, the most apt and excellent in whole nature for Communication of our Thoughts and Notions by Speaking. Written Language is a description of the said Audible Signes, by Signes Visible. The Elements of Lan­guage are Letters, viz. Simple discriminations of Breath or Voice, Articulated by the Organs of Speech.

The Alphabet consists of so ma­ny Letters, as there are to be found such simple Discriminati­ons. And the written Alphabet ought to be just so many single proper Charactes, designed to sig­nifie the Sound or Power of each Letter. And these are the store­house [Page 64]of nature; the Elements, and Materials, out of which all Languages are made. These Let­ters have their Material and their Formal causes, and Organs pro­per to each. Their Matter is va­rious; viz. Breath, or voice, i. e. Breath vocalized by the operati­on of the Larynx. Their Form is constituted by the Motions and Figures of the Organs of speech, affecting the Breath or Voice with a peculiar sound, by which each Letter is discriminated.

Now to find out their just num­ber, first find out the different kinds of Matter, of which Let­ters are made; and these are in ge­neral, Breath when onely Spirit or Breath is Articulated; and Voice, when Articulation is of Breath vocalized. And these a­gain [Page 65]more particularly, are either (after they have passed the La­rynx) onely in the Mouth, or else have passage at the same time through the Nose. So there are 4 kinds of matter: Breath-Oral; Voice-Oral; Breath Ore-nasal, and Voice Ore-nasal.

Next, examine how many dif­ferent Articulations can be made by several Motions and Postures of the Organs in the parts of the Mouth, which applyed severally to the kinds of Matter, may make several Discriminations of sound to the Ear, i. e. several Letters. And of these (as to Con­sonants, viz. Letters made by Appulse) I find and have de­scribed 9. And if possibly any more may be found out, it is most likely, they will not recompence [Page 66]the Discoverers pains, by being of ready and graceful use, but will be sitter to be cast out a­mongst those, to which in the pre­ceding Scheme, an obelisk is pre­fixed. Now by these 9 Articu­lations with Appulse, there will be framed, Consonants Spirital 9; Vocal 9; Naso-Spirital 9; Naso-Vocal 9; in all 36. Then reject­ing those that prove not grace­ful, nor easie to be pronounced, viz. 2 Spiritals, 9 Naso-Spiritals, and 6 Naso-Vocals, in all 17; there will remain 19 Consonants, proper for use according to the de­sign of Letters. And if those, to whom only these 19 Consonants, (or about that number) appear­ed, and stood in such confused order, some in Ternary's, some in Pairs, and some single, were [Page 67]themselves put into so much con­fusion, and so puzled to give a methodical and natural accompt of them, it is no matter of won­der. But now looking upon them, as they lie in their origi­nal Differences and Combinations, and as they are selected out of a Natural stock of 9 Quaternions, or 4 Novenaries: I think (if I flatter not my self) their Nature and Differences lye most plain and obvious to be understood.

In describing Letters framed by Articulation, and more par­ticularly, by Appulse, I have hi­therto had no occasion to speak of H, since that H is onely a Guttu­ral Aspiration, i. e. a more forci­ble impulse of Breath from the Lungs, applyed when we please, before or after other Letters. And [Page 68]if we will ascribe any Articula­tion by Motion or Figure to it, it is onely a more sodain and for­cible contraction of the Lungs, and collecting the Breath in the Pipe of the Aspera Arteria, and possibly somewhat streitning it in the mouth of it, which is the La­rynx; and all the formation of it ends there: and thus applyed to a Vowel, or to some of the Con­sonants, it does indeed affect them with a different sound, and there­fore deserves to be considered in this place; though not as a Con­sonant, having no Appulse; nor as a Vowel, being never Vocal, but affecting onely the Breath, and that by an addition onely of force, but not by any new Fi­gure in the Mouth; and so can­not properly be called a Letter, [Page 69]according to that description we have made of Letters; yet in that it causes a sensible, and not in­commodious Discrimination of Sound, it ought to be annexed to the Alphabet, and to be ex­pressed in the written Alphabet, by some appropriate Character, or else (as in the Greek) mark of Aspiration.

The Use of it before and af­ter Vowels, is familiarly known; but applyed to Consonants it needs to be more diligently con­sidered, because to some of them we find it very unfitly joyned in our Alphabets and Writing; as when we express the powers of F. V. θ. ϑ. &c. by Ph, Bh, Th, Dh, in which Letters there is not any such Guttural Aspiration as H, nor any proper sound of it, neither [Page 70]any mixture of the Natural sounds of P. B. T. or D. But the other are Genuine simple Letters formed, by different Fi­gures of the Organs, from those of these last, and ought to be al­together expressed by single pro­per Characters. The mistake, I guess, lies in this, that Ph and those other, being made by Per­vious Appulse, there is some pas­sage of Breath through the Mouth, which by addition of H, (through prejudice taken in with our first A B C,) is thought to difference them from P, and those other Close Letters of near resemblance. But if better examined, there will be found another difference besides that of Perviousness of Appulse, or passage of Breath; and that consists in the Figure of [Page 71]their Articulation; P. and B. are Labial: Ph and Bh, (or F and V) are Labio-dental; T. and D. are Gingival; Th. and Dh. are Lingua-dental. And for their be­ing Pervious, you may call them (if you please,) Perspirate; but yet they are not Aspirate. i. e. with such an Aspiration as H. Nor can you well joyn H. either before or after any of the 6 Oral Occluse Consonants, without an Hiatus, if you retein the true fi­gure of those Letters. As for Sh, which also is an Original sim­ple Letter, because our Alpha­bet wanted a more proper cha­racter for it, and the figure of it gives a rounder passage of Breath than S, (this hissing in the Goums; that, in a larger space, in the Palat,) it was unaptly sup­plyed [Page 72]by adding H; and the same is Zh to Z: Gh. (as in Through) is onely an Aspirate, and G. ought to be left out. And Ch (as we pronounce it) is a compound of T. and Sh. or at least T. and Y. As also J Consonant with us, or G semblably pronounced, is com­pounded of D and Zh, or D and Y. In WHAT, WHICH, and the like, H is pronounced be­fore W. and so of right ought to be written.

Besides the 9 several Articula­tions by Appulse before descri­bed, I hinted and passed by one, of which yet something may be said, viz. the Stop made by clo­sing the Larynx; though I thought it not worthy to be inserted a­mongst the Letters, in that it is applyed to Breath immediately as [Page 73]it passeth through the Aspera Ar­teria, and not to Breath or Voice Oral or Nasal, being stopt be­fore it arrives there, or at the Tong; and, being a stop of that Instrument of Vocal Sound, the Larynx cannot be vocalized: so that, if it should pass for an Ar­ticulation, it could frame but one Letter, and that uneasie and un­ready to be joyn'd with the mo­tions of other Letters in Speech. It is of some Affinity to K, of a middle nature between K. and H. And this being relaxed may make by a Pervions Appulse there, a sha­king of the Larynx, as when we Gargarize: like as snorting in­wards doth by shaking the Ʋvula, and as may be done with the Lips. And this coming still nearer to an Aspiration, a [Page 74]Touch of it may perhaps be an Ingredient in the rough Guttural pronunciation of the Welch and Irish: And I have heard some Cri­ticks pronounce the Greek x after that manner, but somewhat softer, and our gh (as in Through) has something of it, being more than a bare Aspiration, if strongly pro­nounced; and the describing it by a Composition of g and h shews, that our Ancestors had that No­tion of it, as a middle sound be­tween G and H, though G was properly put instead of K; for it can have nothing of Vocal sound; Voice being raised by stiffe tensi­on of the Larynx, and on the contrary this sound by a relaxed posture of the Muscles there­of.

There are other differences of [Page 75]Sound in Speaking, by which the Tone of several Nations, and oft of several persons in the same Na­tion, is rendred distinct, which are partly to be referred to their Al­phabets, and partly to their Words and manner of Pronunciation, and Accent. As to their Alphabets, some may be found to take in some Letters, as the Ore spirital L' R' and Naso-spirital M' N' Ng'; which others use not, and which (as hath been observed) give a Gut­tural and Nasal smatch to their speaking. And in several Lan­guages, sundry of the more grace­ful Letters in the natural Alpha­bet, are wholly omitted and dif­used. Again some being unapt to pronounce some Letters even in their own Language, get a dif­ferent Tone in speaking. They [Page 76]who have great and long Tongs, cannot so well make that Pervious Appulse of the Tongue to the Goums, which S. requires; but are apt to touch their Teeth, and pronounce Th instead of S, which is called Lisping. On the contra­ry they, who have short Tongs, or are Tongue-tyed, are apt to fall short of the Appulse of the Tongue to the Teeth, and oftner place it on the Goums, and say T. and D. instead of Th and Dh, as Moder for Mother.

They whose Palat is ill formed, (such as are said to want the Roof or Palat of the Mouth) or the Muscles of their Tongue are weak and Flaccid, cannot pronounce R. The former for want of sit sur­face of the Palat to conduct the Breath even and strong to the [Page 77]Goums; the later, for want of strength of the Tongue to su­stain the jarre.

As to their Words, a great dif­ference in the Sound of several Languages ariseth from the sorting of Letters, whereof the Words are framed: some affecting one sort of Letters, some another, to be the most frequent Ingredients in their Words. Some Languages are sull of Consonants, as the Po­lasque: some, as the Italian and French, avoid them: though the French write some Consonants, which they do not pronounce, to be Indices of the Derivations of their words: and generally more Emphasis and Accent is given to the vowels by our neighboring Nations, than by us English.

I have observed a pretty affecta­ation [Page 78]in the Alleman and some others, which gives their Speech a different Tang from ours: to soften the Occluse Gingival Con­sonants, by a kind of Mixture or soft addition of a Spirital in the same Articulation, to a Vocal pro­ducing the Vowel, and making the Consonant end Spirital, which began Vocal, as D T. N N'. Stâdt', Bâdt̂, Mânn', &c. And whilst the Italians strive, as it were, to cut a thread in their Pronunciation between D and T, so to sweeten it; the Florentine comes nearer to T, the Venetian to D. And generally, they make the Occluse Appulse, especially the Gingival, softer than we do, giving a little of perviousness.

Many more Observations of these kinds might easily be made, [Page 79]and are to be found in different Languages, all over the habitable world. And in general, the Free­dom or Apertness and vigour of pronuncing (as is particularly ob­served in the Bocca Romana) and giving somewhat more of Aspira­tion; And on the other side, the closeness and Mufling, and (as I may say) Laziness of speaking (which varieties are found in se­veral Nations comparatively, and by the different natural shapes of the Mouth, and several con­formations of the Organs of speech in those of the same Lan­guage) render the sound of their Speech considerably different, though they all should use the same Alphabet.

I come now to consider Letters made without Appulse, i. e. Vowels, [Page 80]among which will be found two or three more to be added to the before described number of Con­sonants.

The Vewels are made by a free passage of Breath Vocalized through the cavity of the Mouth, without any appulse of the Or­gans; the said cavity's being dif­ferently shaped by the postures of the Throat, Tongue and Lips, some or more of them, but chiefly of the Tongue.

As to the Number of Vowels, they, being differenced by the shape of the cavity of the mouth, may be reckon'd very many, if small differences be allowed. But those which are remarkably di­stinguished, and reasonably suffice to express the pronunciations in use, that we know of, may be [Page 81]reduced to these Eight; α. a. e. i. o. oo. u. ȣ; the sounds whereof, ac­cording to the vulgar pronunciati­on, are thus.

There is so much space between a and e, that there may be a vowel inserted between them, and a fit character for it may be æ, and perhaps some Languages may have a distinct use of such a vowel.

Whereas I make the Material part of Vowels in their Definition to be Breath vocalized, or voice Oral, I am to be understood, as I treat of Vocal Speech; otherwise the same Vowels may be whisper­ed that is, in use of whispering by Articulations of Breath; and, if [Page 82]there were any use of it, they may be pronounced Nasal, both Spirital and Vocal; but in Vocal Speech they are all Ore-vocals, as to common and ready use, and are to be accompted just so many, as there are several Articulations, by which they are made.

The Articulations, that is, the Motions and Postures of the Or­gans in framing the Vowels, are more difficultly discerned, than those of the Consonants; because in the Consonants, the Appulse is more manifest to the sense of Touching, but in the Vowels it is so hard to discern the Figures made by the Motions of the Tongue, (inclining onely toward the Palat, and not touching it) especially about the more inward Bosse or convex of it, that it is ren­dred [Page 83]no less difficult to define the Articulations of the Vowels; and he that can describe them accu­rately, erit mihi magnus Apollo.

Onely he who shall adventure, has this advantage, that it is easier to affirm, than to disprove. Neither are we obliged to seek, nor can expect to find any exact method of nature in the Articulations of Vowels, (as e. g. to find them equally sorted into Gutturals, Pa­latick, or Gingivals, and Labials) no more than were found in those of the Consonants; where, of 9 Articulations, there are Labial 1; Labiodental 1; Linguadental 1; Gingival 4; Palatic 2; and some of these irregularly differing from the rest. I shall therefore take upon me no more, than to set down, what I think may be per­ceived [Page 84]in examining those Ar­ticulations.

But first, to discover how much the middle and inward Bosse of the upper surface of the Tongue is used here, and how little the end of it (except onely to con­duct and give way,) you will upon tryal find your self able to pronounce all the Vowels, holding the end of your Tong, all the while steady against your Teeth. And you may come very near, doing the same without altering the posture of your Lips: which evinceth, that all vowels are formed by the Tong, though in some the Lips concurre, and in some, the Throat. And whilst you make this tryal, the Motions of the Tongue by Contraction, Dilatation, &c. are so easie and [Page 85]so subtil, that you can hardly conceive or distinguish them aright.

But we may imagine the Vow­el (α) to be made by the freest and openest passage of the Throat through the Mouth, and so to have a kind of natural Articula­tion without Art, onely by open­ing the Mouth: (a) to be a lit­tle streitned by the Bosse of the Tongue near the Throat; and therefore if you try to pass from (α) to (a) you will find that you thrust the end of your Tong something forward to raise the Boss of the Tong towards the Palat to streiten the passage.

In (e) the middle of the Palat is streitned, by the breadth of the Tong, and therefore the end of the Tong carried yet forwarder.

And in (i) still more after the same manner, but with a stronger and firmer Tension of the Muscles of the Tong bearing it stisly very near the Palat, and resting the sides of the Tong a­gainst the side-Teeth.

In (o) the Larynx is depres­sed, or rather drawn back by con­traction of the Aspera Arteria. And the Tong likewise is drawn back and Curved; and the Throat more open to make a round pas­sage: and though the Lips be not of necessity, yet the drawing them a little rounder, helps to accom­plish the pronunciation of it, which is not enough to denomi­nate it a Labial Vowel, because it receives not its Articulation from the Lips. (oo) seems to be made by a like posture of the [Page 87]Tong and Throat with (o) but the Larynx somewhat more de­pressed. And if the Lips at the same time be contracted, and born stifly near together, then is made ȣ. (u) with the Tong in the posture of (i) but not so stiffe, and the Lip born near the upper Lip by a strong Tension of the Muscles, and bearing upon it at either corner of the mouth.

Thus, it seems, in oo and (o) the Throat; in (α) the Mouth is more opened: in a. e. i. the streitnings of the cavity of the mouth between the Tong and Pa­lat, are gradually both forwarder and nearer the Roof.

(ȣ) is made by the Throat, and Tong, and Lip. (u) by the Tong and Lip; in ȣ the Tong be­ing in the posture, which makes [Page 88] (oo;) and in (u) in the same posture, which makes (i.) And in this, ȣ and u are peculiar, that they are framed by a double mo­tion of Organs, that of the Lip, added to that of the Tong; and yet either of them is a single Let­ter, and not two, because the mo­tions are at the same time, and not successive, as are eu. pla. &c. Yet for this reason they seem not to be absolutely so simple Vow­els as the rest, because the voice passeth successively from the Throat to the Lips in ȣ, and from the Palat to the Lips in u, being there first moulded into the sigures of oo and i, before it be fully Arti­culated by the Lips. And yet, ei ther these two, ȣ and u, are to be admitted for single Vowels, or else we must exclude the Lips from [Page 89]being the Organs of any single Vowel since that the Mouth be­ing necessary to conduct the Voice to the Lips, will, according to the shape of its cavity, necessarily give the Voice some particular affecti­on of sound in its passage, before it come to the Lips; which will seem to make some such compo­sition in any Vowel which is La­bial. I have been inclin'd to think, there is no Labial Vowel, but that the same affection from the Lips may, somewhat in the na­ture of a Consonant, be added to every of the Vowels, but most subtely, and aptly to two of them, whose Figures are in the ex­treams in respect of Aperture and Situation, one being the closest and forwardest, which is i, and the other being most open and [Page 90]backward; there being reason to allow a Vowel of like sound in the Throat with ȣ, but distinct from it as not being Labial; which will be more familiar to our Eye if it be written oo; as in Cut, Coot, Full, Fool, Tut, Toot, in which the Lip does not concur; and this is that other. Thus u will be onely i Labial, and ȣ will be oo Labial, that is, by adding that motion of the under-Lip, i will become u, and oo will become ȣ; and then the Series of the Vowels accord­ing to their degrees of aperture, and recess towards the Larynx, will be thus, i, e, æ, a, α, o, oo; to which may be added u and ȣ, be­cause of their general use, as be­ing Labially affected more sub­tlely than the rest.

Taking these then for Vowels, it [Page 91]is next observable, that i. u. ȣ. have another peculiar property above the other Vowels, being made by a strong Tension and firme po­sture of the Organ; the first, of the Tongue, the two later, of the Lip, making almost an Appulse, that by reason thereof they serve indifferently for Vowels in respect of the Aperture, and for Conso­nants in respect of the pene-ap­pulse, and so much the more verg­ing either way, by the liberty of managing the Organs, according to the respective Occasions.

And it is here observable, how excellently Nature has provided for the Readiness and Easiness of Speech. For if Speech were to be made onely by Vowels, there would be an hiatus; we could not speak distinct enough, and the [Page 92]Breath would spend too fast; therefore it is checked by the Ap­pulses made in Consonants; and if it should be all Consonants, the Voice would be too much abated, and the passage would not be easie from one Syllable or collection of Letters to another; but being both mixed together, one Vowel in e­very Syllable, for varieties sake, sometimes preceding, sometimes following, and sometimes inter­posed between the Consonants (by checking and reserving the Breath, and letting it pass with a quick impulse at the Aperture of the Organs for the Vowel) give a vigor and emphasis to the Sound: And the motions of the Organs become more facile and ready by the mixture of Apertures with Appulses.

But in these three Vowels, of which I am now treating, there seems to be a kind of Lusus Na­turae; these are of a middle con­stitution between Vowels and Consonants, partaking of both: and we see, how many disputes, their simple and ambiguous na­ture hath created among the Grammarians, and how it has be­got the mistake concerning Diph­thongs; they being all, that are accompted properly such, com­pounded either with i. u. or ȣ, and are, as I conceive, Syllables and not Diphthongs (as it is intended to be signified by that word:) i. ȣ. and u. then supplying the place and nature of Consonants by streitning the passage of Breath, so as to check it not much less, than is done by some of the Pervious [Page 94]Consonants, and by making a smart stroke at the Aperture in passage to another Vowel, Vid. Ap­pend. answer­able to the Collision, or rather Divulsion of the Organs made by other Consonants, as is evident in pronouncing ia, ȣa. id est ya. wa. For the same reason, of the im­proper Diphthongs the most pass­able are those compounded with e or o, as ea, oa, because of the nearness, that o has to ȣ, and e to i, and having either of them a little of that Spring in the Muscles, which I have last described.

Concerning ȣ and u, this may be observed, that in subjoyning them to another vowel, ȣ is apter to follow α and o, because of their resemblance in the posture of the Tong, as hath been said; and for the like reason u is apter to fol­low [Page 95] a and e, as ȣaȣl, wawl. euge, &c. But generally if the Vowels follow, then it is ȣ precedes, and not u.

Our vulgar (i.) as in (stile) seems to be such a Dipthong (or rather syllable or part of a sylla­ble) composed of a. i. or e. i. and not a simple Original Vowel.

I may now give you a Scheme of the whole Alphabet.

Letters, i. e. such simple Dis­criminations of Sound as may be Elements of Signes for commu­nication by Speech, are differen­ced by

• Matter of Sound, prepared by the Lungs, Larynx, Mouth, Nose.
  • Breath
    • Oral (and may be stiled) Ore-spirital.
    • Ore-Nasal. (and may be stiled) Naso-spirital.
  • Voice.
    • Oral (and may be stiled) Ore-vocal.
    • Ore-Nasal. (and may be stiled) Naso-vocal.

• Forme, Ar­ticulation by
  • Appulse of one Organ to another, Consonants by degree
    • Plenary Close
      • Lip to Lip. Labial, as B.
      • Tong to Gums. Gingival, D.
      • Tong to Palat, Palatic, G.
    • Partial Pervious
      • Lip to Teeth. Labiodental V.
      • Tong to Teeth, Lingua­dental Dh.
      • Tong to Gums, Gingival
        • Sibilant. Z.
        • Jarring. R.
        • Lateral. L.
      • Tong to Palat, Palatic, Zh. or J.
  • Inclination of one Organ to another without Appulse.
  • Vowels—α. a. ae. e. i. o. oo. u. ȣ.

Thus there are 9 Articulations with Appulse, which applied seve­rally to four sorts of matter, viz. Breath-Oral, Breath Ore-nasal, Voice-Oral, Voice-Ore-nasal, may make 36 Consonants; whereof I have in­stanced in one to each Articula­tion, having before described o­ther three to each Articulation. And likewise nine Articulations without Appulse so applied, may make 39 vowels.

Of these some are

• Commodious
  • Consonants
    • Ore-spirital, 7. p. t. k. f. th. s. sh.
    • Ore-vocal, 9. b. d. g. v. dh. z. zh. l. r.
    • Naso-vocal, 3. M. N. Ng.
  • Vowels,
    • Orevocal—9. α. a. ae. e. i. o. oo. u. ȣ.
• Uneasie and unplea­sant, or not suffici­ently distinct.
  • Consonants
    • Ore-spirital 2. L^• R^c
    • Naso-spirital 9.
    • Naso-vocal 6.
  • Vowels
    • Ore-spirital 9. viz. in vocal speech, (of which I am treating) but in whispering they are commodious.
    • Naso-spirital 9. viz. in vocal speech, (of which I am treating) but in whispering they are commodious.
    • Naso-vocal 9. viz. in vocal speech, (of which I am treating) but in whispering they are commodious.
    • Of intermediare Figures without deter­minate number.

The Vowels, in respect of their Articulations, may seem not unfitly to be sorted into

• Guttural—oo. o.α.
• Palatic—a. ae. e. i.
• Labio-Guttural—ȣ.
• Labio-Palatic—u.

There are some other Accidents besides those spoken of before, which have an Influence in vary­ing the Sound of Languages, as Accent and Emphasis; which though now much confounded, seem to have been formerly more [Page 99]distinguished. Accent, as in the Greek names and usage, seems to have regarded the Tune of the voice; the Acute accent raising the Voice in some certain Sylla­bles, to a higher, i. e. more acute Pitch or Tone, and the Grave de­pressing it lower, and both ha­ving some Emphasis, i. e. more vigorous pronunciation. The Cir­cumflex keeps the voice in a mid­dle Tune, and therefore in the Latine is compounded of both the other, but withal adding an Em­phasis and longer stay upon that Syllable, expressed in Greek by a suitable character [῀] And therefore the Syllable, which is circumflexed, is always accompt­ed long. This Tuning of the Voice by Accent, is of great concern to the gracefulness of pronunciation. [Page 100]And although our Languages have not such accurate Rules for it as the Greek had, yet it is much consi­dered, and submitted to the judgement of more Critical Ears, to direct and determine what is graceful, and what is not; and here arises a difference in the Sound of Languages, by the different Use of Accent. For example, the French and Greek run contrary one to the other: Whereas the Greek in the end of a word chan­geth the Acute accent to a Grave, and most Languages have some­what like (which is therefore cal­led Cadence of their voice;) the French conclude with an acute Ac­cent, raising the Tune of their Voice in the last Syllable.

Emphasis is of a larger conside­ration and extent, and not so much [Page 101]regards the Tune (leaving that to Accent) as a certain Gran­deur, whereby some Letter, Sylla­ble, Word, or Sentence is rendred more remarkable than the rest, by a more vigorous pronunciation, and a longer stay upon it: As, in a Speech some Sentences are made more remarkable, in a Sentence some one or two words; in a Word, some one Syllable; and in a Sylla­ble, some one Letter. And of these Two last I am chiefly here concern­ed to take notice.

In a Poly-syllable word, it is first to be considered, to which Sylla­ble the Emphasis is to be given, and in each Syllable, to which Letter the former of these is usu­ally confounded with Accent; but in the later lies the greatest difference of Pronunciation, the [Page 102]Consonants coming in for a share of Emphasis, and making a Sylla­ble long, where the Vowel is short: E. g. Altera, in respect of the whole word, the Emphasis and Accent lies in the first Syllable, but then that Syllable is again ca­pable of a two-fold Emphasis, viz. either in the Vowel or in the Con­sonant. Most Foreigners pro­nounce their Vowels soft, as this they pronounce Aaltera, or Aul­tera, staying upon the Vowel, and making a soft gentle Appulse in the Consonant; We are apt to pronounce it Altera, making the Vowel short and giving the Em­phasis to the Consonant. And this kind of Emphasis, viz. of the Consonant, is apt to gain too much place in our Speech, and I take it to be a general vicious habit in our [Page 103]pronunciation, as they, who learn to sing, will find; for their first at­tempt must be, to unlearn that ha­bit. So also We say Forma, they, Fôrma, or (as we would write it, if it were English) Forema. We say, Mórtem; they Moretem or Moortem. We say, Cońsonańt, they Cônsonánt, or, Conesonaunt. We say, Catt, they, Caut. Yet some­thing may be said on our behalf, that giving an Emphatical Sound to the Consonants, makes our Pro­nunciation more distinct, and cer­tain to the Ear. And here it may be proper to assert, that there is no such thing in nature as a double Letter, either Conso­nant or Vowel, in one and the same Syllable, and it is incongru­ous, to write them so. For where­as every Letter written should [Page 104]have one and but one determi­nate signification, to express the power of some one certain Sound made by the Mouth; with more than Poetical Licence one signe is set for another, and the same Letters in the same Alphabet in several words, are made to have several powers. Thus in our En­glish, ee, and ie, and e, for i, (as Feel, Field, English:) oo for ȣ, &c. And frequently the Emphasis is incongruously supplied by adding quiescent Letters (the Phrase confessing the absurdity) as Bate Batt, Base Basse, Bare Barre. But I do not intend to pursue the many Pseudography's in use, which are too numerous; but to shew of how great concern the Em­phasis were, if rightly used; and how most of those Anoma­lies [Page 105]in writing might be avoided, and better supply'd by noting our Words or Syllables, that need it, with some mark of Emphasis. This will shew, when a Vowel is to be pronounced long or short, and cut off superfluous Quiescent Letters, and double Consonants: for, when there is a double Con­sonant written, though sometimes it changeth the Vowel, Ale, All, Cale, Call; yet generally it serves to transfer the Emphasis from the Vowel to the Consonant.

This kind of Emphasis then, I mean not the Emphasis of a Sylla­ble in reference to a word, but the Emphasis of a Letter in respect of Syllables, as it is to belong either to the Vowel, or to the later Con­sonant (if there be any) in the same syllable, if it were better [Page 106]heeded, and noted by some mark, would conduce much to Ortho­graphy; as for example, if an Ac­cent were placed over the Vow­el, or else over the Consonant, as the case requires, ál, al, or rather, leaving the Accent to mark out the Syllable in a word, to which Emphasis is due, where need is; make use of long and short Cha­racters set over the Vowel, and to make the least work, suppose eve­ry Vowel to be long, which is not marked, and mark onely those Vowels, which are to be pronounc­ed short, and the Emphasis trans­ferred to the following Conso­nant. Thus instead of Ball Boll, Bale, Ballad; Beal, Bell; Biele, or Beel, Bil; write Bαl, Băl; Bal, Bălad; Bel, Bĕl; Bil, Bĭl: I say, if our pronunciation were written in [Page 107]proper Letters, and with marks of Emphasis, it would restore Or­thography, and cut off many su­perfluous Letters that are written, not to be pronounced, but onely to make an incongruous supply of Emphasis, or to alter the pow­er of some other Letters in the same word; whereof in some Lan­guages so many examples are found, that it would be tedious to recount them. In the mean time we are apt very unjustly to laugh at the uncouth Spelling in the wri­tings of unlearned persons, who writing as they please, that is, using such Letters, as justly express the power or Sound of their Speech; yet, forsooth, we say write not true English, or true French, &c. Whereas the Gram­marians themselves, ought rather [Page 108]to be blamed, and derided for accommodating Words so ill with Letters, and Letters with so faulty Alphabets, that it requires almost as much pains to learn how to pro­nounce what is written, and to write what is spoken, as would serve to learn the Language it self, if Characters or Signs written were exactly accommodated to Speech. But, though it be true, that this so needless and unprofi­table incumbrance of Learning might wholly be removed by rectified Alphabets, and setling a just correspondence between the Signs Audible, and the Signs Visi­ble, if such Alphabets and a regu­lar usage of them could take place; yet it is not to be ho­ped or imagined, that the incon­gruous Alphabets, and Abuses of [Page 109]writing can ever be justled out of their Possession of all Libraries and Books, and universal habit and practice of Mankind. This were to imply, that all Books in being should be destroyed and a­bolished, being first new Printed after such rectified Alphabets; and that all the Age should be pre­vailed with, to take new pains to unlearn those habits, which have cost them so much labour. Nei­ther did any such Hopes or Am­bition set my thoughts on work, but partly the worthiness and cu­riosity of this Subject in it self, and chiefly the great use of an accurate knowledge of the Nature of Let­ters and Speech, in directing to a steady and effectual way of In­structing Deaf and Dumb persons, to obtain a reasonable perfection [Page 110]of utterance of Speech; and to discern (in some measure) with their Eye, by observing the mo­tions of their Mouth, what others speak. And to that end I have added to this Essay an Appendix, relating that designe; both which I hope and promise my self, will find a Candid reception from those, who shall consider these poor and slight Papers, as a work of Charity and Compassion; and may be acceptable to them, as it is pleasing to my self, to have stu­died some relief for the Calami­tous and Deplorable Condition of persons Deaf and Dumb.