ΠΛΑΝΗΛΟΓΙΑ

A SUCCINCT and SEASONABLE DISCOURSE OF THE Occasions, Causes, Nature, Rise, Growth, and Remedies of MENTAL ERRORS.

Written some Months since; and now made publick, both for the healing and pre­vention of the Sins and Calamities which have broken in this way upon the Churches of Christ, to the great scandal of Religion, hardening of the Wicked; and obstruction of Reformation.

Whereunto are subjoined by way of Appendix:

I. Vindiciarum Vindex: Being a Succinct, but Full Answer to Mr. Philip Cary's weak and impertinent Exceptions to my Vindiciae Legis & Foederis.

II. A Synopsis of Ancient and Modern Antinomian Errors: with Scriptural Arguments and Reasons against them.

III A SERMON composed for the preventing and heal­ing of Rents and Divisions in the Churches of Christ.

By IOHN FLAVELL, Preacher of the Gospel at Dartmouth in Devon.

With an EPISTLE by several Divines, Relating to Dr. CRISP's Works.

LONDON: Printed by R. Roberts, for Tho. Cockerill, at the Three-Leggs in the Poultrey, over-against the Stocks-Market, 1691.

THE Reverend Author of the ensuing Treatises, ha­ving in them explained and defended several Gospel-Truths, unto which divers things in the Writings of the Reverend Dr. Crisp deceased, do seem very opposite; Whereas some of us who subscribed a Paper, the design whereof was only to testify, That we believed certain Writings of the Doctor's never before Published, were faithfully transcribed by his Son, the Publisher of them; which Paper is now, by the Book­seller, prefixed to the whole Volume, con­taining a large Preface, which we never saw till after the publication, together with all the Doctor's former Works that were published many years before; And are hereupon, by some weak People, misunder­stood, as if by that Certificate, we intend­ed an Approbation of all that is contained in that Volume. We declare, we had no such intention: As the Paper we subscribed hath no word in it that gives any such intima­tion: But are well pleased these later Wri­tings [Page] are Publish'd (in reference whereto▪ We only certified our belief, which we fix­edly retain, of the Publisher's fidelity) as they contain many passages in them, that may in some measure remedy the hard and hurtful construction that many expressions were more liable to in the former; whereof the Doctor seem'd apprehensive himself, when in the beginning of his Discourse, on Tit. 2. 11, 12. he speaks thus: [Beloved, I am jealous of you with an holy jealousy, 1 Cor. 11. 2, 3. Lest after the sweet wooing of you in Christ's Name, that you might be espoused unto him; I say, I am jealous, and fear, lest as the Serpent beguiled Eve through his sub­tilty, namely, bewitching her to a pre­sumptuous, licentious adventuring on God's gentleness, while she tasted the forbidden Fruit; so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in him, namely, by presuming too much upon him, and adventuring to continue in Sin, in hope that Grace may abound. For the preventing of which dangerous miscarriage, which hath been the dan­gerous lot of many Thousands, I thought good to step in with this Text, which I am persuaded will prove a sea­sonable warning to some at least. And [Page] this Pio [...] caution of the Author [...], lest he should be misunderstood, gives us some grounds to believe, that be intended them not in the more exceptionable [...]. 'Tis best, if any unwary Reader receive hurt, that he receive his healing also from the same hand; and whereas a Paper was Printed upon this occasion soon after the Publication of the Doctor's Works, We willingly adopt so much of it as is requisite to our present purpose, which is to this effect:

‘Some who Subscribed, this Certificate, saw only the Paper it self, to which sub­scription was desired; never having per­used the Works of Dr. Crisp. The Cer­tificate only concerned the Son, not the Fa­ther; and certified only concerning the Son, That they who should subscribe it, believed him in this, to deal truly; that he was not a Falsarius; that he would not say that was his Father's, which was not so; a Paper so sober, so modest, was (taken by it self) scarce refusable by a Friend.’

‘The Son's Preface, some that sub­scribed this Certificate, saw not, nor had any notice, or the least imagination of its Contents; otherwise the part of a Friend had certainly been done, as well in advi­sing against much of the Preface as in subseribing the Certificate.’

[Page] ‘For the Works of this Reverend Per­son themselves, as it no way concern'd the subscribing this Certificate, to know what they were; so from the opinion that went of the Author, among many good Men, That he was a Learned, Pious, Good Man, it was supposed they were like­ly to have in them many good and useful things; to which it was only needful to think them his, not to think them per­fect.

‘We may in some respect judge of Books as of Men, i. e. reckon, that though di­vers very valuable Men, have had re­markable failings; yet that upon the whole, 'tis better they have lived and been known in the World, than that they should not have lived, or have lived ob­scure.’

‘The truth is (which we have often con­sidered) that though the great Doctrines of Christian Religion do make a most co­herent, comely Scheme, which every one should labour to comprehend and digest in his mind; yet when the Gospel first becomes effectual for the changing mens hearts, 'tis by God's blessing this or that passage which drops; the most discern not the series and connection of Truths at first, and too little afterwards.’

[Page] ‘Vpon that view of Dr. Crisp's Writings we have had since the Publication, we find there are many things said in them, with that good savour, quickness, and spirit, as to be very apt to make good impressions upon mens hearts; and do judge, that being greatly affected with the Grace of God to Sinners himself, his Sermons did thereupon run much in that strain. All our minds are little, and incomprehensive; we cannot receive the weight and impres­sion of all necessary things at once, but with some inequality; so that when the Seal goes deeper in some part, 'tis the shallower in some others.’

‘If some parts of Dr. Crisp's Works be more liable to exception, the danger of hurt thereby seems in some measure obviated in some other: As when he says, p. 46 vol. 1. Sanctification of Life, is an in­separable Companion with the Justifi­cation of a Person by the Free-Grace of Christ. And Vol. 4. p. 93. That in respect of the Rules of Righteousness, or the Matter of Obedience, we are under the Law still, or else we are Lawless, to live every Man as seems good in his own eyes, which I know no true Christian does so much as think.

[Page] ‘In like manner whereas, Vol. 2. Serm. 15. and perhaps elsewhere, the Doctor seems to be against evidencing our Justification and Union to Christ, by our Sanctification and new Obedi­ence; we have the truth of God in this matter plainly deliver'd by him. Vol. 4. p. 36. when he teacheth, that our Obedi­ence is a comfortable evidence of our being in Christ; and on that, as well as on many accounts, necessary.

‘The difference between him and other good men, seems to lie not so much in the things, which the one or other of them be­lieve, as about their order and reference to one another; where, 'tis true, there may be very material difference: but we reckon, That notwithstanding what is more controversible in these Writings, there are much more material things, wherein they cannot but agree, and would have come much nearer each other, even in these things, if they did take some words or terms which come into use on the one or the other hand, in the same sense; but when one uses a word in one sense, ano­ther uses the same word (or understands it, being used) in quite another sense, here seems a vast disagreement, which proves at length to be verbal only, and really none [Page] at all: As let by Condition, be meant a de­serving Cause, (in which case 'tis well known Civillians are not wont to take it) and the one side would never use it, con­cerning any good Act that can be done by us, or good Habit that is wrought in us, in order to our present acceptance with God, or final Salvation. Let be meant by it, somewhat, that by the constitution of the Gospel-Covenant, and in the nature of the thing is requisite to our present and eternal well-being, without the least notion of desert, but utmost abhorrence of any such notion in this case, and the other side would as little refuse it. But what need is there for contending at all about a Law-term, about the proper or pre­sent use whereof, there is so little agreement between them it seems best to serve, and them it offends. Let it go, and they will well enough understand one another. Again, Let Justification be taken for that which is compleat, entire, and full, as it results at last from all its Causes, and Concurrents, and on the one hand it would never be denied Christ's righteousness justifies us at the Bar of God in the Day of Iudgment, as the only deserving cause; or affirmed that our Faith, Repentance, Sincerity, do justi­fie us there, as any cause at all. Let Iu­stification [Page] be meant only of being justified in this or that particular respect; As for in­stance, against this particular Accusation, of never having been a Believer: and the honest mistaken Prefacer would never have said, O horrid! upon its being said, Christ's Righteousness doth not justify us in this case: For he very well knows Christ's Righteous­ness will justifie no man that never was a Believer; but that which must immediately justifie him against this particular Accu­sation, must be proving, that he did sincerely believe, which shews his interest in Christ's Righteousness, which then is the only deser­ving cause of his full entire Iustification.’

‘There is an Expression in Vol. 1. p. 46. That Salvation is not the end of any good work we do, which is like that of another; we are to act from Life, not for Life. Neither of which are to be rigidly taken, as 'tis likely they were never meant in the strict sense. For the former, this Reve­rent Author gives us himself the handle, for a gentle interpretation, in what he pre­sently subjoyns, where he makes the end of our good works to be the manifestation of our Obedience and Subjection; the set­ting forth the praise of the glory of the Grace of God; which seems to imply, that he meant the foregoing negation in a com­parative, [Page] not in an absolute sense; un­derstanding the glory of God to be more principal; and so that by end, he meant the very ultimate end: so for the other 'tis likely it was meant, that we should not act or work for life only, without aiming and endeavouring, that we might come to work from life also.

‘For it is not with any tolerable charity supposable, that one would deliberately say the one or the other of these in the rigid sense of the words; or that he would not, upon consideration, presently unsay it, being calmly reasoned with. For it were in effect to abandon Humane Nature, and to sin against a very Fundamental Law of our Creation, not to intend our own feli­city; it were to make our first and most deep­ly Fundamental Duty, in one great essen­tial branch of it, our sin, viz. To take the Lord for our God: For to take him for our God most. essentially includes our taking him for our supream good; which we all know, is included in the notion of the last end; it were to make it unlawful to strive against all sin, and particularly a­gainst sinful oversion from God; wherein lies the very death of the Soul, or the sum of its misery; or to strive after perfect conformity to God in holiness, and the full [Page] fruition of him, wherein its final blessed­ness doth principally con [...]ist.’

‘It were to teach us to violate the great Precepts of the Gospel; Repent, that your sins may be blotted out. Strive to enter in at the strait Gate.—Work out your salvation with fear and trem­bling. To obliterate the Paterns and Precedents set before us in the Gospel. We have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified.—I beat down my body, lest I should be a castaway— That thou mayest save thy self, and them that hear thee

‘It were to suppose one bound to do more for the salvation of others, than our own salvation. We are required to save others with fear, plucking them out of the fire. Nay, we were not (by this rule, strictly understood) so much as to pray for our own salvation; (which is a doing of somewhat) when no doubt, we are to pray for the suc­cess of the Gospel, to this purpose, on be­half of other me [...].’

‘Twere to make all the threatnings of E­ternal Death, and promises of Eternal Life, we find in the Gospel of our Bles [...]ed Lord, useless, as motives to shun the one, and obtain the other: For they can be mo­tives no way but as the escaping of the for­mer, [Page] and the attainment of the other have with us the places and consideration of an end.’

‘It makes what is mentioned in the Scrip­ture, as the Character and commendation of the most eminent Saints; a fault, as of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, &c. That they sought the better and Heavenly Countrey; and declared plainly that they did so: which necessarily implies their making it their end.’

‘But let none be so harsh as to think of a­ny good man, that he intended any thing of all this; if every passage that falls from us be stretch'd and tortured with utmost severity, we shall find little to do besides accusing others, and defending our selves as long as we live.’

A Spirit of meekness and love, will do more to our Common Peace, than all the Disputations in the World.

Vpon the whole, We are so well assured of the peaceful healing temper of the present Author of these Treatises, That we are per­suaded he designed such a course of mana­ging the Controversies wherein he hath con­cerned himself, as not on the one hand to injure the memory of the Dead; and on the other, to prevent hurt or danger to the Li­ving.

[Page] Nor do we say thus much of him, as if he sought, or did need any Letters of Re­commendation from us; but as counting this Testimony to Truth, and this expression of respect to him, a Debt; to the spontaneous payment whereof, nothing more was requisite besides such a fair occasion as the Providence of God hath now laid before us, inviting us thereunto.

  • John Howe,
  • Vin. Alsop,
  • Nath. Mather,
  • Increase Mather,
  • John Turner,
  • Rich. Bures,
  • Tho. Powel.

AN EPISTLE TO THE READER

Candid Reader,

CEnsure not this Treatise of ER­RORS, as an Error in my Pru­dentials, in sending it forth at such an improper time as this. I should never spontaneously have a­wakened sleeping Controversies, after God's severe castigation of his people for them, and in the most proper and hopeful season for their Redintegration.

And beside what I have formerly said, I think fit here to add, That if the at­tacque had been general, and not so im­mediately and particularly upon that Post or Quarter I was set to defend, I should with Elihu have modestly waited till some abler and more skilful hand had [Page] undertaken the defence of this Cause.

If ever I felt a temptation to envy the happiness of my Brethren, it hath been whilst I saw them quietly feeding their Flocks, and my self forced [...] some part of my precious [...] time (devoted to the [...] combat­ing with unquiet and erring Br [...]thren: But I see I must not be my own chuser. Notwithstanding, I hope, and am in some measure persuaded, That publick benefit will redound to the Church from this irk­s [...]me Labour of mine. And that this strife will spread no further, but the Malady be cured by an Antidote growing in the very place where it began: And that the Chri­stian Camp will not take a general Alarm from such a [...]ingle Duel.

The Book now in thy hands consisteth of Four parts, viz. 1. A general Discourse of the Causes and Cures of Errors, very ne­cessary at all times (especially at this time) for the reduction and establish­ment of se­duced and staggering Christians; and no­thing of that nature having occurred to my observation among the manifold Po­lemical Tracts that are extant, I thought it might be of some use to the Churches of Christ in such a vertigenous Age as we live in; and the blessing of the Lord go [Page] forth with it for benefit and establishment.

2. Next, thou hast here the Controver­sies moved by my Antagonist, first about the Mosaick Law complexly taken, which he boldly pronounces to be an Adam's Co­venant of works. And secondly, about God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. which he also makes the same with that God made with Adam in Paradise; and affirms Cir­cumcision (expresly called a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith) to be the Seal of the said Covenant of Works first made with Adam.

3. Finding my Adversary in the pur­suit of his design, running into many An­tinomian delirations, to the reproach and damage of the Cause he contends for; I thought it necessary to take the principal Errors of Antinomianism into examina­tion, especially at such a time as this, when they seem to spring afresh, to the hazard of God's Truth, and the Churches Peace; wherein I have dealt with becoming-mo­desty and plainness, if haply I might be any way instrumental in my plain and home way of Argumentation, to detect the falsity and dangerous nature of those notions which some good men have vent­ed; [Page] and preserve the sounder part of the Church from so dangerous a contagion.

4. In the next place I think it necessary to advertise the Reader, That whereas in my first Appendix under that head of the Conditionality of the New Covenant, I have asserted Faith to be the Condition of it, and do acknowledg, p. 246. that the word Condition is variously used among Iurists; yet I do not use in any sense, which implies or insinuates, that there is any such condition in the New Covenant, as that in Adam's Covenant was, consist­ing in perfect, personal, and perpetual obe­dience; or any thing in its own nature meritorious of the benefits promised, or capable to be performed by us in our own strength; but plainly, that it be an act of ours (tho' done in God's strength) which must be necessarily done before we can be actually justified or saved; and so there is found in it the true suspending nature of a condition; which is the thing I contend for, when I affirm, Faith is the condition of the New Covenant.

How many senses soever may be given of this word Condition, this is the determi­nate sense in which I use it throughout this Controversy. And whosoever denies the suspending Nature of Faith, with [Page] respect to actual Justification, pleads (according to my understanding) for the actual Justification of Infidels. And, thus I find a Condition defined by Na­var. Iohan. Baptist. Petrus de Perus. &c. Conditio est Suspensio alicujus dispositionis tantisper dum aliquid futurum fiat. And a­gain, Conditio est quidam futurus eventus, in quem dispositio suspenditur.

Once more, My Reader possibly may be stumbled at my calling Faith some­times the Instrument, and sometimes the Condition of our Justification, when there is so great a Controversy depending among Learned Men, with respect to the use of both those terms. I therefore desire the Reader to take notice, That I dive not into that Controversy here, much less presume to determine it; but finding both those Notions equally op­posed by our Antinomians, who reject our actual Justification by Faith either way, and allow to Faith no other use in our actual Justification, but only to ma­nifest to us what was done from Eterni­ty; I do therefore use both those terms, viz. the Conditionality, and Instrumenta­lity of Faith, with respect unto our Ju­stification, and shew in what sense those terms are useful in this Controversy, and [Page] are accommodate enough to the design and purpose for which I use them, how repugnant soever they are in that parti­cular, wherein the Learned contend a­bout the Use and Application of them.

To be plain, when I say, Faith ju­stifies us as an Organ or Instrument; my only meaning is, that it receives, or appre­hends the Righteousness of Christ, by which we are justified; and so speaking to the Quomodo, or manner of our Justi­fication, I say with the general Suffrage of Divines, we are justified instrumental­ly by Faith.

But in our Controversy with the Anti­nomians, where another different Questi­on is moved about the Quando, or time of our actual Justification; there I af­firm, that we are actually justified at the time of our believing, and not before; and this being the Act upon which our Justification is suspended, I call Faith the Condition of our Justification.

This, I desire, may be observed, lest in my use of both those terms, my Rea­der should think, either that I am not aware of the Controversy depending a­bout those terms; or, that I do herein manifest the vacillancy of my Judgment, as if I leaned sometime to one side, and [Page] sometime to another. I speak not here, ad idem, as they do in that Contest; but when I call it a Condition of Justificati­on, my meaning is, that no Man is ju­stified until he believe. And when I call it an Instrument, my meaning is, that it is the Righteousness of Christ appre­hended by Faith, which doth justify us when we believe. And so I find the Ge­nerality of our Divines calling Faith some­times a Condition, and sometimes an In­strument of our Justification, as here I do.

And if there be any Expression my Reader shall meet with, which is less ac­curate, and may be capable of another sense: I crave that Candor from him, that he interpret it according to this my declared Intention.

5. Lastly, I have added to the former, a short, plain, practical Sermon, to pro­mote the Peace and Unity of the Churches of Christ, and prevent their Relapse into past Follies.

In all the Parts of this Discourse, I have sincerely aimed at the Purity and Peace of the Church of God; and he greatly mistakes, that takes me for a Man of Contention. 'Tis true, I am here con­tending with my Brethren, but pure necessity brought me in; an unpleasing [Page] irksomeness hath attended me through it, and an hearty desire, and serious moti­on for Peace amongst all the professed Members of Christ, shall close and finish it. Let all Litigations of this nature (at least, in this Critical Juncture) be su­spended by common Consent, since they waste our time, hinder our Communion, imbitter our Spirits, impoverish practi­cal Godliness, grieve the Spirit of God, and good Men, make sport for our Com­mon Enemies, who warm their own Fingers at the Fire of our Contentions; and place more Trust in our dividing Lusts, than they do in their own feeble Arguments, or castrated Penal Laws, to effect our Ruin.

It is my grief (the Lord knows) to see the delightful Communion the Saints once enjoyed, whilst they walked toge­ther under the same Ordinances of God, now dissolved in such a sad and scandalous Degree, by the Impressions of erroneous Opinions, made both upon their Heads and Hearts. I do therefore heartily joyn with Budaeus in his pious Wish,Utinam tam conser­tis manibus compertam comprehen­samque ve­ritatem se­mel reti [...]e­re poss [...]mus qu [...]m pro­tinùs agni­tam festi­vis oculis hilares ex­osculamur. That God would give his People as much Con­stancy in retaining the Truths they once received, as they had Joy and Comfort at their first Reception of them. I must [Page] in this occasion declare my just Jealousy, that the Non-improvement of our Bap­tismal Covenant unto the great and so­lemn Ends thereof in our Mortification, Vivification, and regular Communion with the Church of Christ, into which So­ciety we were matriculated by it; is at this day punished upon Professors in those fiery Heats, and fierce Oppositions, unto which God seemeth to have penally deli­vered us at this day.

For my own part, it is my fixed Reso­lution to provoke no good man if I can help it. But if their own intemperate Zeal shall provoke them, in pursuit of their Er­rors, to destroy the very nature of God's Covenant of Grace with Abraham and his Seed, and I have a plain call (as here I had) at once to defend God's Truths and my Peoples Souls against them, I will ear­nestly contend in the Cause of Truth, whilst I can move my Tongue, or make use of the Pen of the Scribe.

Reader, I shall appeal to thee, if thou be wise and impartial, Whether any man that understands the Covenant of God re­newed with Abraham (which is the grand Charter, by which we and our Children hold and enjoy the most invaluable Privi­leges) can endure to see it dissolved and [Page] utterly destroyed, by making it an abo­lished Adam's Covenant of Works; and stand by as an unconcerned Spectator, when challenged and provoked to speak in defence thereof?

Is there any thing found in God's Co­venant with Abraham, Gen. 17. to make it an abolished Covenant of Works, which doth not as injuriously bear upon, and strike at the very life of the Covenant of Grace in the last and best Edition of it, under which the whole Church of God now stands? What is that thing (I would fain know) in God's Covenant with A­braham? Is it the Promissory part of it, I will be a God unto thee, and to thy Seed after thee, Gen. 17. 7? God forbid: for the essential and sweetest part of the New Covenant is contained in that Pro­mise, Ier. 31. 33. Heb. 8. 10. Yet thou wilt find my Antagonist here forced to as­sert, God may become a Peoples God in a special manner by virtue of the abolished Covenant of Works; and such he makes this Covenant to be.

Or does the Restipulation Abraham and his were here required to make unto God, even to walk before him, and be perfect; doth this make it an Adam's Covenant of Works? Surely no. For as God there re­quires [Page] perfection of Abraham, so Christ requires the same perfection of all New-covenant Foederates now, Matth. 5. 48. Be ye perfect, as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect; which is altogether as much as ever God required of Abraham and his, in Gen. 17. 1. Take Perfection in what sense you will, either for a posi­tive Perfection, consisting in truth and sincerity; or a comparative Perfection, consisting in the growth and more emi­nent degrees of Grace; or a superlative Perfection, which all New-covenant Foe­derates strive after here, Phil. 3. 12, 13- and shall certainly attain in Heaven, Heb. 12. 23. In this also the Covenant with Abraham, and with us, are truly and sub­stantially one and the same.

Or doth my mistaken Friend imagine, that God required this Perfection of A­braham, and his, as in the First Cove­nant he required it from Adam, and all his? viz. to be performed and maintain­ed in his own strength, under penalty of the Curse; but now though Christ command perfection, yet what duty lies in any command, answerable strength for it lies in the Promise? Very well, and was it not so then? compare the Command, Deuter. 10. 16. Circumcise [Page] therefore the fore-skins of your hearts, with the answerable gracious Promise to enable them so to do, Deut. 30. 6. The Lord thy God will circumcise thy heart, and the heart of thy Seed, to love the Lord thy God.

Or lastly, Did Circumcision, the Sign and Seal added to Abraham's Covenant, make it an Adam's Covenant of Works? That's equally impossible with the former: for no man, but such a daring Man as I am concerned with, will dare to say, that a Seal of the righteousness of Faith (as Cir­cumcision was, Rom. 4. 11.) can make the Covenant, to which it is affixed (and which I have shewn in all the other sub­stantial parts, the very same with that we are now under) to become an Adam's Co­venant of Works.

These things I have here superadded, to leave as little as is possible behind me to be an occasion of further trouble and con­tention. Let all strife therefore in so plain a case be ended: Contentious Spirits are not the most excellent Spirits among Christians. Fire (and so Contention) is more apt to catch in low-built thatcht Cottages, than in high-built Castles, and Princely Palaces: the higher we go, still the more peace. The highest Region is most sedate and calm. Stars have the [Page] strongest influence, when in conjunction. Angels (tho legions) have no wars among them; and as willingly go down, as up the Ladder, without justling each other. And the Most High God is the God of Peace; let us also be the Children of Peace. And I do assure the Persons with whom I con­tend, That whilst they hold the head, and are tender of the Churches Peace, I can live in charity with them here, and hope to live in glory with them hereafter.

I remain, Reader, thine and the Truth's Friend, John Flavell.
THE CONTENTS OF THE Causes and Cures, &c.
  • THE Etymology and definition of the word Error, Introd. p. 2, 3.
  • The difference between Heresy and Error, Introd. p. 4.
  • Twenty general Observations, Disc. p. 7.
  • Obs. 1. Truth is the object and natural food of the Vnderstanding, p. 7. Explain'd and confirm'd, P. 8.
  • Obs. 2. Several sorts of Knowledge, a­mongst which the supernatural knowledge of saving Truths revealed in the Scrip­tures, is the best, 9.
  • Obs. 3. Vnto the attainment of Divine Knowledge out of the Scripture, some things are naturally, yet less principally requisite in the subject; and something absolutely and principally necessary, 11.
  • As the irradiation of the mind by the Spirit of God; the benefits of which, 12.
  • Obs. 4. Among the manifold impediments to the obtaining of true Knowledge, and setling the mind in the truth and faith of the Gospel, these three are of special [Page] consideration; viz. Ignorance, Curiosity and Error, p. 13.
  • Obs. 5. Error is binding upon the Consci­ence as well as Truth; and altogether as much, and sometimes more influential upon the Affections and Passions than Truth is, 14.
  • Obs. 6. 'Tis exceeding difficult to get out Error when once it is imbib' d, and hath rooted it self by an open profession, 15.
  • Obs. 7. Men are not so circumspect and jea­lous of the Corruptions of their Minds by Errors, as they are of their Bodies in times of Contagion; or of their Lives with respect to gross Immoralities, 17.
  • Obs. 8. 'Tis a great Iudgment of God to be given up to an Erroneous Mind, 19.
  • Obs. 9. 'Tis a pernicious Evil to advance a mere Opinion into the place or seat of an Article of Faith; and to lay as great stress upon it, as they ought to do upon the most clear and fundamental Point, 21.
  • Obs. 10. Error being conscious to it self of its own weakness, and the strong assaults that will be made upon it, evermore la­bours to defend and secure it self under the wings of Antiquity, Reason, Scripture, and high pretensions to Reformation and Piety, 23.
  • Obs. 11. God in all Ages in his tender care [Page] for his Churches and Truths, hath still qualified and excited his Servants for the defence of his precious Truths, against the Errors and Heresies that have succes­sively assaulted them, p. 25.
  • Obs. 12. The want of a modest suspicion and just reflection, gives both confidence and growth to Erroneous Opinions, 27.
  • Obs. 13. There is a remarkable involution or concatenation of Errors, one linking in, and drawing another after it, 29.
  • Obs. 14. Errors abound most, and spring fastest in the times of the Churches Peace, Liberty, and outward Prosperity under Indulgent Governors, 31.
  • Obs. 15. Errors in the tender bud, and first spring of them, are comparatively shy and modest, to what they prove afterwards; when they have spread and rooted them­selves into the minds of multitudes, and think it time to set up and justle for them­selves in the World, 33.
  • Obs. 16. Nothing gives more countenance and increase to Errors, than a weak and feeble defence of the Truth against it, 35.
  • Obs. 17 Errors of Iudgment are not cured by compulsion and external force, but by rational conviction, and proper spiritual remedies, 36.
  • Obs. 18. Erroneous Doctrines producing Di­visions [Page] and fierce Contentions amongst Christians, prove a fatal Stumbling-block to the World; fix their Prejudices, and obstruct their conversion to Christ, p. 38.
  • Obs. 19. How specious and taking soever the pretences of Error be, and how long soe­ver they maintain themselves in esteem among men, they are sure to end in the loss and shame of their Authors and Abet­tors at last, 40.
  • Obs. 20. If ever Errors be cured, and the Peace and Vnity of the Church establish­ed men must be convinced of, and ac­quainted with the occassions and causes both within and without themselves, from whence their Errors do proceed; and must both know and apply the proper rules and remedies for the prevention or cure of them, 42.
  • Divine Permission an occasion of Error, 44.
  • Which must be prevented by avoiding,
  • 1. A want of love to the Truth, 45.
  • 2. Pride and wantonness of the mind, 46.
  • 3. The neglect of Prayer, ibid.
  • Culpable Causes of Errors in men are,
  • 1. A wrangling humor at the pretended ob­scurity of the Scriptures, p. 47.
  • Cod's wisdom manifested in leaving some difficulties in the Scriptures, 49.
  • For the prevention of this, cause these Rules [Page] following to be heeded and practis'd, viz.
  • R. 1. To expound all obscure Texts of Scripture according to the analogy and proportion of Faith, p. 50.
  • R. 2. Not to wrest Scripture from its ge­neral and common sense in favour of our preconceived Opinions, 51.
  • R. 3. When we meet with a difficult place of Scripture, to search the Context throughly, 52.
  • R. 4. Let one Testament freely cast its light upon the other, the Old on the New, and the New on the Old, ibid.
  • R. 5. Observe the sense which the current of Expositors do agree in, and which natu­rally agrees with the scope of the place, 53▪
  • Cause 2. The abuse of the Liberty given by Christ to all his People to read the Scriptures, and to judge of the sense of them by a private judgment of Discre­tion, ibid.
  • Remedy of it, is to observe the limits which Christ hath set to this Liberty; which Limitations are,
  • 1. A liberty to read and study, but not pub­lickly to expound and preach the Word, 57.
  • 2. Christians of different Abilities ought to study some parts of Scripture rather than others, 59.
  • [Page] Cause 3. Slothfulness in a due and serious search of the Scripture, 61. How to find the institution of the Sabbath in the Scripture, 64. How to find the institu­tion of the Baptism of Infants there, 65.
  • Several Considerations to cure this slothful­ness, 67.
  • Viz. A serious search of the Scriptures is our duty, ibid.
  • No action of ours that is not agreeable to God's will, is acceptable to him, 68.
  • This is the path in which the wisest and best of men have gone before us, 69.
  • Every discovery of the Will of God obtain'd in this method, is highly pleasant, 70. Confirms our Faith, 71.
  • An impartial search into the Will of God will be a testimony of our Integrity and▪ Sincerity, ibid.
  • Cause 4. Instability of judgment, and un­setledness of mind about the truth of the Gospel, 72.
  • This is the effect sometimes of Hypocrisie, sometimes of weakness, 74.
  • To prevent which, some Rules, 76. viz.
  • R. 1. To get a real inward implantation into Christ, ibid.
  • R. 2. To labour for an experimental Taste of the Truths professed, p. 77.
  • [Page] R. 3. To study hard, and pray earnestly, p. 77.
  • R. 4. To be sensible of the benefit of a good establish­ment, and the evil and danger of a wavering mind, p. 78.
  • Cause 5. Eagerness to snatch at any Doctrine or Opi­nion that promiseth ease to an Anxious Conscience, 79.
  • For the cure of which some Queries propounded, viz.
  • Qu. 1. Whether a good trouble be not better than a false Peace? 82.
  • Qu. 2. Whether Troubles so laid asleep, will not revive again with a double force? 83.
  • Q. 3. Whether the Saints in Scripture, that have been un­der terrors, have not found peace by those very methods which the Principles that quiet you, exclude? 84.
  • Cause 6. An easy Credulity. 85. The Remedies against this.
  • 1. The consideration, that it is beneath a man, 88.
  • 2. That the priviledge of trying all things, is of too great a value to be thus slighted, 89.
  • 3. Observe the Practices and Lives of those men whose Opinions you are so ready to imbrace, 90.
  • Cause 7. A vain Curiosity, 90. Remedies.
  • 1. A due consideration of the mischiefs that have en­tred into the World by this, 92.
  • 2. God hath not left his people to seek their Salvati­on among curious, but solid and plainly revealed Truths, 94.
  • 3. 'Tis a dangerous snare of Satan, ibid.
  • Cause 8. Pride and Arrogancy of Humane Reason, 95. Remedies.
  • 1. 'Tis the Will of God, that Ratiocination should sub­mit to Revelation, and Reason to Faith, 98.
  • 2. A sense of the weakness and corruption of Natural Reason, 99.
  • [Page] 3. Consider the manifold mischiefs flowing from the pride of Reason.
  • Cause 9. Ignorant Zeal, 101. Defensatives.
  • 1. A Reflection upon the mischiefs occasioned by it in all Places and Ages, 104.
  • 2. A consideration how hurtful it may prove to your own Soul, 106.
  • 3. How prejudicial is hath been to Human Society, 107.
  • 4. That Opinion is to be suspected which comes in by the Affections, 108.
  • Cause 10. Impulsive of spreading Errors, Satan, 110. Rules for Cure.
  • 1. Pray for a sound Conversion, 113.
  • 2. Acqu [...]int your selves with the Devices of Satan, ibid.
  • 3. Resign your Souls to the conduct of Christ and his Spirit, 114.
  • 4. Live in the practice of the truths and duties God hath revealed already, 115.
  • Cause 11. Instrumental, the false Teacher, ibid. Re­medies.
  • 1. Pray for strength of Grace, and solidity of Iudg­ment, and use all means to obtain it, 119.
  • 2. Acquaint your selves with the Artifices of such as these, 121. Such as are, their endeavours to blast the reputation of faithful Teachers, ibid. the mixing their Errors among solid Truths, 122.
  • Cause 12. The methods used by False Teachers to draw men from the truth; among which the first is, their representing the Abuses of the Ordinances of God in such a manner as to scare tender Consciences from the use of them, 124. Remedies.
  • 1. Nothing so great and sacred in Religion, but what hath been vilely corrupted and abused, 127.
  • [Page] 2. 'Tis the temper of a gracious Soul to love those Or­dinances which are most abused and disgraced, 129.
  • 3. Before you forsake any Ordinance, consider whe­ther you have found no advantage by it, 130.
  • Cause 13. Another method which they use, is, a granting to their Followers a Liberty of Prophe­sying, 131. Remedies.
  • 1. Let all that incourage or undertake such a work as this, consider the danger they cast on their own, and other mens Souls, 134.
  • 2. How daring a presumption it is to intrude them­selves into such an Office, without a Call from Christ, 136.
  • 3. To vent our unsound Liberty, is said in Scripture to be our greatest dishonour, 137.
  • 4. 'Tis much more safe and advantageous for every one to fill their own places with their proper work, ibid.
  • Cause 14. Another method of theirs, is a Spirit of Enthusiasm, or a pretence to Revelations, 138.
  • Remed. 1. Whatever Doctrine seeks credit to it self this way, ought to be suspected of wanting a Scrip­ture-foundation, 141. 2. Consider, how often the Devil hath abused the World by such ways as these, 142. 3. H [...]w impossible it is to know, whether such a Revelation be from God, or the Devil, 144.
  • Cause 15. Another method they use, is Timing their Assaults, 145.
  • Remed. 1. Respects Ministers, that they should look carefully after the Souls of young Converts, 149.
  • Remed. 2. Young Converts should consider, That they must not expect to find Christ in one way, and not another; that they are expos'd to the Snares of Satan; and that it is a sad thing to grieve the [Page] hearts of those Ministers who have travelled in pain for them, 150, 151.
  • Cause 16. Another Artifice of False Teachers, is, to press their Proselytes to declare speedily for them and their Opinions. 152. Remedies. Consider,
  • 1. That hasty ingagements in disputable matters, have cost many Souls dear, 155.
  • 2. Weighty Actions require answerable deliberations, ibid.
  • 3. The only season wherein men have to consider, is, before their Affections are too far ingaged, 156.
  • 4. Consult with pious Ministers, and trust not to your own Iudgment, 157.
  • 5. Suspect that Opinion that will not allow you a due time for consideration, 158. Consectaries from the whole, ibid.
  • 1. The usefulness and necessity of [...] standing Ministry, ibid.
  • 2. How little peace the Church must expect, till a greater light be poured out upon it, 159.
  • 3. What a mercy it is to be kept sound in Iudgment, and stedfast in the ways of Christ, 161.
  • 4. We may discover one cause of the great decay of serious P [...]ety in this Age, 162.
  • 5. One Reason of the frequent. Persecutions God ex­ercised his Church with, 163.
  • 6. We may learn the duty and necessity of mutual Charity and forbearance, 164.
The Contents of Vindiciarum Vindex, or the First Appendix.
  • THE whole of the Answer reduced under three heads, p. 175.
  • Two things premised, 176.
  • [Page] Head 1. Mr. Cary hath not been able to free his Thesis from the horrid absurdity charged upon it, viz. That Moses, and the whole People of God, were under a Covenant of Works, and a Covenant of Grace at the same time, 179. From whence follows,
  • Absurd. 1. That all their lives they were in the mid­way between life and death, and after death in the mid-way betwixt Heaven and Hell, 180.
  • Mr. Cary's First Reply, 184. Answer'd, 185.
  • Mr. Cary's Second Reply, 187. Answer'd, ibid.
  • The Ten Commandments complexly taken, including the Ceremonial Law, were added as an Appendix to the promise, 192.
  • Mr. Cary's Answer to it consider'd, 194.
  • A Promise of pardon in the Sinai Dispensation, to pe­nitent Sinners, 198, 199.
  • The several Arguments that are left standing in their full force against Mr. Cary, 200, 201, 202, 203.
  • The Law given at Sinai, wrote of the chief Privileges which the Jews had, 203.
  • His Argument, that the Law is not of faith, consi­der'd and answer'd, 206.
  • Dr. Edw. Reynolds's Opinion about the Law, 207, 213.
  • The Position about Abraham's Covenant, being a Co­venant of Grace, defended, 213. The first Ar­gument for the proof of it, 214. Mr. C's Re­ply answer'd, 215. His distinction of A Cove­nant of Works, and The Covenant of Works, overthrown, 217, 218.
  • The second Argument for the proof of it, 220. Mr. C's Reply answer'd, 221.
  • Third Argument, 222. Mr. C's Reply answer'd, 223.
  • [Page] The Covenants not made with Abraham in Gen. 17. 225, 228.
  • Circumcision did not oblige all men, on whom it passed, to keep the whole Law of Moses for Righteousness, 230.
  • Fourth Argument, 231. Circumcision in its direct end, taught them the corruption of Nature by sin, and the mortification of sin by the Spirit, 231.
  • Mr. C's Reply answer'd, 232. His Arguments to prove the Sinai Covenant a Covenant of Works, likewise answered, 233. Cutting off, in Gen. 17. 14. not the same with the death threatned to A­dam, ibid.
  • How faith reckon'd to Abraham for Righteousness while he was in Vncircumcision, 234. How the Sinai Covenant is a Bondage Covenant, 236. Dr. Crisp's Iudgment, 237. Of the Conditio­nality of the New Covenant, 242. The Question stated, 243. What the word Condition signifies, 245. Antecedent and consequent Conditions, 246.
  • No condition of the Covenant with respect to its first sanction with Christ, 247. but hath an antecedent Condition with respect to the application of its bene­fits unto men, 248. Which is Faith, as organi­cally consider'd, 249. The Opinions of Orthodox Divines in this Question cited, 250. That the Covenant is Conditional, proved from M. C's own Concessions, 256.
  • Christ hath not perform'd the Condition for us, 262. Tho he works Faith in us by his Spirit, 263.
  • A Condition does not imply merit, 264.
  • Arguments to prove the conditionality of the Covenant; 266.
  • First Argument, 267. Second Argument, 268. Third Argument, ibid. Fourth Argument, 270. Fifth Argument, 272.
  • [Page] Mr. Cary's Reply to it, 273. The answer, 274.
  • The Reasons of my Faith and Practice in the Baptism of Infants, 278. in several Theses.
  • Thes. 1. God hath dealt with his Church and People in the way of a Covenant, and will do so to the end of the World, 281.
  • Thes. 2. After the Cessation of the first Covenant, as a Covenant of Life, God hath published a Second Covenant of Grace by Iesus Christ, 283. When the Covenant of Grace took place, 284.
  • Thes. 3. Tho the primordial Light of this Covenant of Grace was comparatively weak and obscure; yet God from the first publication of it, hath been heightning its Privileges, and amplifying its Glory in the after Editions; and will more and more illustrate it to the end of the World, 287.
  • Thes. 4. It is past all doubt, that the Infant-seed of Abraham, under the second Edition of the Cove­nant of Grace, were taken into God's gracious Co­venant, had the Seal of that Covenant applied to them, and were thereby added to the visible Church, 289.
  • Thes. 5. That Rom. 11. 17. is a clear proof, that believing Parents, and their Seed, are ingrafted into the room of the Jews, who were broken off, 290, 291.
  • Thes. 6. Suitably hereunto, when a Christian Church was constituted, the Children of such believing Pa­rents were declared foederally holy, 1 Cor. 7. 14. That the Promise which was seal'd to them by Cir­cumcision, is now seal'd by Baptism, Act. 2. 39. 292.
  • Thes. 7. The change of the Token and Seal of the Cove­nant, from Circumcision to Baptism, will by no means infer the change of the Covenants, especially when the [Page] latter comes into the place of, and serves to the same use and end with the former, Col. 2. 11. p. 295.
  • A Postscript to Mr. Cary, 297.
  • Some absurdities chargeable upon him, 300.
The Contents of the Second Appendix: Or, The Rise and Growth of Antinomianism.
  • THe rise of Antinomianism, Ap. 2. 308.
  • The Abuse of Free-grace chargable upon good, as well as wicked Men, 311.
  • By what means some good Men may be drawn to such dangerous Opinions, 313, 314, 315, 316.
  • A Catalogue of Ten Antinomian errors, 318. which are all contrary to the current of the Scriptures, 323. and to the experience of Saints, 325.
  • Error 1. That Iustification is an eternal Act of God, and so perfectly abolishes Sin in our Persons, that we are as clear from Sin as Christ himself, 328.
  • Sense of the Orthodox about it, 328, 329.
  • This proved to be irrational, 332. Vnscriptural, 335. Injurious to Iesus Christ, 338. and injurious to the Souls of Men, 340.
  • Error 2. That Iustification by Faith, is only the ma­nifestation to us of what was really and actually done before. Reasons against it, 341, ad 350.
  • Error 3. That Men ought not to doubt of their Faith, or question, whether they believe or no. Reasons against it, 351 ad 354.
  • Error 4. That Believers are not bound to confess their Sins, or pray for the Pardon of them. From whence will follow either, 1. That there is no Sin in Believers, 355. Or 2. That Sin in them is inconsiderable, 357. Or 3. That it is not the Will of God they should confess and mourn over them; which is refu­ted, 358
  • [Page] Error 5. That God sees no Sin in Believers, 360.
  • This proved to be injurious to God's Omniscience, 361.
  • To be inconsistent with his providential Dispensati­ons, 362. To have no foundation in Scripture, 363. To clash with their other Principles, 365.
  • Error 6. That God is not angry with the Elect for their Sins, 365. How the Antinomians led in­to this Error, 366.
  • Three Concessions about God's Corrections of his People, 368.
  • God lays his Corrections on his People, 369.
  • And for their Sins, 371.
  • These Corrections consistent with his satisfi'd Iustice, 373
  • Error 7. That by God's laying our Iniquities upon Christ, he became as sinful as we, and we as com­pleatly righteous as he. That not only the Punish­ment of Sin, but the Sin it self was laid upon Christ, 375, 376.
  • Four Concessions, 377, 378.
  • Sin simply considered, did not become the Sin of Christ, 379.
  • We are not as compleatly Righteous as Christ, 384.
  • Error 8. Neither Believers own Sins, nor the Sins of o­thers, can do them hurt. Nor must they do any Duty for their own Good, Salvation, or eternal Reward, 389.
  • That Believers sins do them no hurt, refuted, ibid. Sin consider'd formally, 392. Effectively, 392. Reductively, 393.
  • That Believers ought to do no Duty for their own good, or with an Eye to their reward, refuted, 395.
  • Self-ends, either Corrupt or Spiritual, 397. This Error injurious to the Souls of Men, ibid.
  • Error 9. The new Covenant is not made with us, but Christ for us; The Covenant is wholly a promise without any Condition on our parts; That Faith, [Page] [...] [Page] [...] [Page] Repentance, Obedience, are Conditions on Christ's part, and that he performs them for us, 398. Refuted, 399.
  • The Covenant of Redemption, and of Grace, distinguish­ed, ibid.
  • Christ did not believe and repent for us, 401.
  • Error 10. They deny Sanctification to be the evidence of Iustification, 404. Refuted, ibid.
The Contents of the Sermon about Gospel-Unity.
  • THe Text, 1 Cor. 1. 10. open'd, p. 410. A
  • Duty, and the Arguments inforcing it, 410, 11.
  • Doctrine, Vnity among Believers is a necessary Mercy, and indispensible Duty, 414.
  • What Vnity among Believers is, explained, 415. Con­sists in a Mystical Vnion with the Head, and a Moral Vnion among themselves, ad. 419.
  • This Vnity desirable as it conduces, (1.) To the Glory of God, 419. (2.) To the Comfort and Benefit [...]f Souls, 421. (3.) With respect to the World, 422.
  • Use. By way of Exhortation to Vnity, 424.
  • Motive 1. 425. Mot. 2. 427. Mot. 3. 428 Mot. 4. 432. Mot. 5. 433. Mot. 6. 436.
  • Use 2. Direction, 436.
  • Direction 1. 437. Direction 2. 440.
  • Ministers to mind their proper work, ibid.
  • The People to mind theirs, 441.
  • Direction 3. 442. Direct. 5. 444. Direct. 6. 445. Direct. 7. 446. Direct. 8. 447.

A Table of the Scriptures Vindicated and Explained.

C C. stands for the Causes and Cures of Mental Errors; Ap. 1. for the 1st Appendix▪ Ap. 2. for the 2d Appendix; Serm. for the Sermon of Gospel-Vnity.

  • GEnesis, cap. 17. v. 7, 8. Ap. 1. p. 233. —v. 9, 10. C. C. p. 65. Ap. 1. 225.
  • Leviticus, cap. 26. v. 40, 41. C. C. p. 70. Ap. 1. p. 198.
  • Numbers, cap. 23. v. 21. Ap. 2. p. 363.
  • Job 12. 11. C. C. p. 7.
  • Psalm 58. 3. C. C. p. 3. 89. v. 30, 31. Ap. 2. p. 374.
  • Canticles 2. 6, 7. Serm. p. 423.
  • Isaiah 9. 16. C. C p. 136.
  • Jer. 15. 16. C. C. p. 70. 50. v. 20. Ap. 2. p. 364.
  • Mal. 3▪16. C. C. p. 107.
  • Matt. 15. 14. C. C. p. 88.
  • Joh. 17. 23. Serm. p. 422.
  • Acts 2. 38. C. C. p. 65. —v. 46, 47. Serm. p. 421. cap. 7. 38. Ap. 1. p. 199. cap. 15. 10. Ap. 1. p. 236. cap. 16. 2, 3. Ap. 1. p. 226, 229.
  • Rom 1. 26. C. C. p. 19. cap. 4. 9, 10. Ap. 1. p. 234. —v. 11. Ap. 1. p. 220. —v. 13. Ap. 1. p. 234. cap. 5. 17, 20. Ap. 1. p. 189. cap. 6. 1, 2. Ap. 2. p. 309. cap. 8. 28. Ap. 2. p. 389. —v. 33. Ap. 2. p. 336. cap. 9. 4. Ap. 1. p. 203. cap. 10. 2. C. C. p. 102. cap. 11. 16. C. C. p. 65. —v. 17. Ap. 1. p. 290. cap. 12. 2. C. C. p. 67. —v. 6. C. C. p. 50. cap. 15. 5. Serm. p. 419.
  • 1 Cor. 3. 12, 13. C. C. p. 41. cap. 7. 14. C. C. p. 51. 65.
  • 2 Cor. 3. 6, 7. Ap. 1. p. 197.
  • Galatians 1. 6. C. C. p. 154. cap. 3. 1. C. C. p. 118.—v. 12. Ap. 1. p. 205.—v. 17. Ap. 1. p. 176, 229. cap. 4. 17. C. C. p. 102. cap. 5. 1. Ap. 1. p. 236.—v. 23. Ap. 1. p. 230.—v. 4. Ap. 1. p. 284.
  • [Page] Ephesians 4. 14. C. C. p. 118, 72, 74.
  • Philippians 2. 12. Serm. p. 424.
  • Colossians 2. 6, 7. C. C. p. 76.—v. 10, 11. C C. p. 66. cap. 3. 10. C. C. p. 8.
  • 1 Thessalonians 4. 11. Serm. p. 440.
  • 2 Timothy 4. 3. C. C. p. 90.
  • Hebrews 5. 13, 14. C. C. p. 59.
  • James 4. 8. C. C. p. 74.
  • 2 Peter 1. 12. C. C. p. 77. cap. 2. 1. C. C. p. 18, 34.—v. 3. C. C. p. 118. cap. 3. 16. C. C. p. 47, 48. p. 51. p. 135.
  • 1 John 2. 13. C. C. p. 59. cap. 3. 7. Ap. 2. p. 385.
  • Jude v. 4. Ap. 2. p. 3 10. v. 13. C. C. p. 3. 73. v. 16. C. C. p. 46.

CORRIGENDA.

PAge 10. l. 23. for you, r. your; p. 18. l. 23. for their, r. there; and l. 2 4. for as r. a; p. 23. in the Margent, r. te­netur; p. 37. l. 23. r dissent in judgment; p 51. l. 19. r. [...]; p. 54. l. 22. [...]or full liberty, r. fullness; p. 62. l. 19. r. spars [...]m; p. 72. l. penult, r. wait; p. 80. in the Marg. for assailed, r. absolved; p. 89. l. 7. for cary, r. carry; p. 120. l. 4. add wait; p. 155. l 4 r. preventives; p. 167. l. 19. r. temerity; p. 249. dele as it is, and add in its place, in this sense.

A Blow at the Root: OR, THE CAUSES and CURES OF Mental Errors.

The INTRODUCTION.

FINDING by sad Experience what I be­fore justly feared, that Errors would be apt to spring up with Liberty (though the restraint of just Liberty, being a practical Error in Rulers, can never be the cure of Mental Errors in the Sub­jects;) I judged it necessary at this Season to give a Succinct account of the Rise, Causes, and Remedies of several [Page 2] Mistakes and Errors, under which even the Reformed Churches among us, as well as others, do groan at this Day.

I will not stay my Reader long upon the Etymology and Derivations of the Word. We all know that Etymologies are no Definitions▪ Yet because they cast some light upon the Nature of the thing we enquire after, it will not be lost labour to observe that this word ER­ROR derives it self from three Roots in the Hebrew Language.

(1.) The Frst word Primitively sig­nifies to deviate or decline from the true Scope or path, [...] Chatta, a Scopo a­berravit. as Unskilful Marks-men, or Ignorant and Inadvertent Travellers use to do. The least variation or turning aside from the true Rule and Line, tho it be but an hairs breadth, presently be­comes an Error. We read, Iudg. 20. 16. of 700. Benjamites, who could every one sling stones at an hairs breadth, and not miss, [...] Heb. and not err. This by a Metaphor is applied to the Mind or Judgment of man; and denotes the warpings thereof from the Straight, Per­fect, Divine Law or Rule, and is usually Translated by the word Sin.

(2.) It is derived from another word also, which signifies to wander in varia­ble [Page 3] and uncertain motions: You find it in the Title of the 7th. Psalm, Shiggaion of David, a wandring Song, [...] Shaga. or a Song of variable Notes and Tunes, higher and lower, sharper and flatter. In both the former Derivations it seems to note sim­ple Error through meer Weakness and Ignorance. But then

(3.) In its Derivation from a third Root, it signifies not only to Err, but to cause others to Err also; and so signifies a Seducer, or one that is active in leading others into a wrong way; and is applied in that sense to the Prophets in Israel, [...] Tagna. in Hiph. who seduced the People, Ezek. 13. 10. The Greek Verb [...] takes in both these senses, both to go astray, and when put Transitively, to lead or cause others to go astray with us. Hence is the word [...], Planets or wandring Stars; the title given by the Apostle Iude ver. 13. to the false Teachers and Seducers of his time.

An Error then is any departure or de­viation in our Opinions or Judgments from the perfect Rule of the Divine Law: And to this all men by nature are not only liable, but inclinable. Indeed man by Nature can do nothing else but Err, Psal. 58. 3. he goeth astray as soon as [Page 4] born; makes not one true step till renew­ed by Grace, and many false ones after his Renovation. The Life of the Holi­est man is a Book with many Errata's; but the whole Edition of a wicked man's Life is but one continued Error; he that thinks he cannot Err, manifestly Errs in so thinking. The Pope's supposed and pretended Infallibility hath made him the great deceiver of the World. A good man may Err, but is willing to know his Error, and will not obstinately maintain it, when he once plainly discerns it.

Error and Heresy among other things differ in this; Heresie is accompanied with pertinacy; and therefore the He­retick is [...], sels-condem­ned; his own Conscience condemns him, whilst men labour in vain to convince him. He doth not formally and in terms Condemn himself, but he doth so equi­valently, whilst he continues to own and maintain Doctrines and Opinions which he finds himself unable to defend against the evidence of Truth. Humane frailty may lead a man into the first, but De­vilish Pride fixes him in the last.

The word of God which is our rule, must therefore be the only Test and Touchstone to try and discover Errors; [Page 5] for Regula est index sui & obliqui. 'Tis not enough to convince a man of Error, that his Judgment differs from other mens; you must bring it to the Word, and try how it agrees or disagrees therewith; else he that charges another with Error, may be found in as great or greater an Error himself. None are more dispo­sed easily to receive and tenaciously to de­fend Errors, than those who are the An­tesignani, Heads or Leaders of Erroneous Sects, especially after they have fought in defence of bad Causes, and deeply en­gaged their Reputation.

The following Discourse justly entitles it self, A BLOW AT THE ROOT: And though you will here find the Roots of many Errors laid bare and open; which comparatively are of far different degrees of Danger and Ma­lignity; which I here mention together, many of them springing from the same Root: Yet I am far from censuring them alike; nor would I have any that are con­cerned in lesser Errors be exasperated, because their lesser Mistakes are mentio­ned with greater and more pernicious ones; this Candor I not only intreat, but justly challenge from my Reader.

And because there are many general [Page 6] and very useful Observations about Er­rors, which will not so conveniently come under the Laws of that Method which governs the main part of this Dis­course, viz. the CAVSES and CVRES of Error: I have there­fore sorted them by themselves, and pre­mised them to the following Part in Twenty Observations next ensuing.

Twenty general Observations, a­bout the rise and increase of the Errors of the times.

First Observation.

TRuth is the proper Object, the na­tural and pleasant food of the Un­derstanding, Iob 12. 11. Doth not the ear (that is, the understanding by the ear) try words, as the mouth tasteth meat? Knowledg is the assimilation of the Un­derstanding to the truths received by it. Nothing is more natural to man, than a desire to know: Knowledg never cloys the Mind, as food doth the natural Appe­tite; but as the one increaseth, the other is proportionably sharpened and provo­ked. The Minds of all (that are not wholly immers'd in Sensuality) spend their Strength in the laborious search and pursuit of Truth. Sometimes climbing up from the Effects to the Causes, and then descending again from the Causes to the Effects; and all to discover Truth. Fer­vent Prayer, sedulous Study, fixed Me­ditations, are the labours of inquisitive Souls after Truth. All the Objections [Page 8] and Counter-arguments the mind meets in its way, are but the pauses and hesi­tations of a bivious Soul, not able to de­termine whether Truth lies upon this side, or upon that.

Answerable to the sharpness of the Minds appetite, is the fine edg of Plea­sure and Delight it feels in the discovery and acquisition of Truth. When it hath Rack'd and Tortured it self upon knotty Problems, and at last discovered the Truth it sought for; with what joy doth the Soul dilate it self, and run (as it were with open arms) to clasp and welcome it?

The Understanding of man at first was perspicacious and clear, all Truths lay ob­vious in their comely order and ravishing beauty before it: God made man upright, Eccl. 7. 29. this rectitude of his mind consisted in Light and Knowledg, as ap­pears by the prescribed method of his Re­covery, Col. 3. 10. Renewed in knowledg, after the Image of him that created him. Truth in the Mind, or the Minds union with Truth, being part of the Divine Image in man, discovers to us the Sin and Mischief of Error, which is a defa­cing (so far as it prevails) of the Image of God.

[Page 9] No sooner was man created, but by the exercise of knowledg he soon discovered God's Image in him; a [...]d by his Ambi­tion after more, lost what he had. So that now there is an haziness or cloud spread over Truth by Ignorance and Error, the sad effects of the Fall.

Second Observation.

Of Knowledg there are divers sorts and kinds; some is Humane, and some Divine; some Speculative, and some Practical; some Ingrafted, as the Notions of Morality, and some Acquired by painful search and Study: But of all knowledg none like that Divine and Su­pernatural knowledg of saving truths re­vealed by Christ in the Scriptures; from whence ariseth the different degrees both of the Sinfulness and danger of Errors; those Errors being always the worst, which are committed against the most important Truths revealed in the Go­spel.

These Truths lye infolded either in the plain words, or evident and necessary consequences from the words of the Ho­ly Scriptures; Scripture-Consequences are of great use for the refutation of Er­rors; [Page 10] it was by a Scripture-consequence, that Christ successfully proved the Resur­rection against the Sadduces, Matth. 22. The Arrians and other Hereticks rejected consequential proofs, and required the express words of Scripture only, hoping that way to defend and secure their Er­rors, against the arguments and assaults of the Orthodox.

Some think that reason and natural light is abundantly sufficient for the dire­ction of life; but certainly nothing is more necessary to us for that end, than the writ­ten Word; for though the remains of na­tural light have their place and use, in di­recting us about natural and earthly things; yet they are utterly insufficient to guide us in spiritual and heavenly things, 1 Cor. 2. 14. The natural man receiveth not the things of God, &c. Eph. 5. 8. Once were ye darkness, [...], now are ye light in the Lord, i. e. by a beam of heavenly light shining from the Spirit of Christ, through the written Word, into you minds or understandings.

'Tis the written Word which shines upon the path of our Duty, Psal. 119. 105. the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament do jointly make the Solid Foun­dation of a Christian's Faith. Hence [Page 11] Eph. 2. 20. we are said to be built upon the Foundation of the Apostles and Pro­phets. We are bound therefore to ho­nour Old Testament Scriptures as well as New, they being part of the Divine Ca­non; and must not scruple to admit them as sufficient and authentick proofs, for the confirmation of Truths, and refutati­on of Errors. Christ referr'd the people to them, Ioh. 5. 39. and Paul Preached and Disputed from them, Acts 26. 22.

Third Observation.

Vnto the Attainment of Divine Knowledg out of the Scriptures, some things are naturally, yet less principally requisite in the Subject; and something absolutely and principally necessary.

The natural qualifications desirable in the Subject, are clearness of Apprehensi­on, solidity of Judgment, and fidelity of Retention. These are desirable re­quisites to make the Understanding susce­ptible of knowledg; but the irradiation of the mind by the Spirit of God, is prin­cipally necessary, Joh. 16. 13. He shall guide you into all truth: The clearest and most comfortable light he giveth to men, is in the way of Sanctification, called the teachings of the Anointing, 1 Iohn 2. 27.

[Page 12] When this spiritual sanctifying light shines upon a mind, naturally enriched and qualified with the three foremention­ed requisites, that Mind excels others in the riches of knowledg. And yet the teachings of the Spirit in the way of San­ctification, do very much supply and re­compence the defects and weaknesses of the forementioned qualifications. Whence two things are highly remarkable:

1. That men of great abilities of na­tute, clear apprehensions in natural things, strong Judgments, and tenacious memories, do not only frequently fall into gross Errors and damnable Heresies them­selves; but become Heresiarchs, or Heads of erroneous Factions, drawing multitudes into the same sin and misery with them­selves; as Arrius, Socinus, Pelagius, Bellarmin, and multitudes of others have done.

And secondly, It is no less remarkable, that men of weaker parts, but Babes in comparison, through the Sanctification and direction of the Spirit, for which they have humbly waited at his feet in Prayer, have not only been directed and guided by him into the Truth, but so con­firm'd and fixed therein, that they have been kept sound in their Judgments in [Page 13] times of abounding Errors, and firm in their adherence to it in days of fiercest Persecution. How men of excellent na­tural parts have been blinded, and men of weak natural parts illuminated; see 1 Cor. 1. 26, 27. Matth. 11. 25.

Fourth Observation.

Among the manifold impediments to the ob­taining of true Knowledg, and setling the mind in the truth and faith of the Gospel, these Three are of special re­mark and consideration,viz.Ignorance, Curiosity, and Error.

Ignorance slights it, or despairs of at­taining it. Truth falls into contempt a­mong the ignorant, from sluggishness and apprehension of the difficulties that lye in the way to it, Prov. 24. 7. Wisdom is too high for a fool. Curiosity runs beside or beyond it. This Pride and Wantonness of the mind puffs it up with a vain con­ceit, that it is not only able to penetrate the deepest Mysteries revealed in the Scripture, but even unrevealed secrets also, Col. 2. 18. intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind. But Error militates directly against it, contradicts and opposeth Truth, [Page 14] especially when an Error is maintained by pride against inward convictions, or means of better information. 'Tis bad to maintain an Error for want of light; but abundantly worse to maintain it a­gainst light. This is such an affront to the Spirit of God, as he usually punishes with Penal Ignorance, and gives them up to a spirit of Error.

Fifth Observation.

Error is binding upon the Conscience, as well as Truth; and altogether as much and sometimes more influential upon the Af­fections and Passions, as Truth is.

For it presents not it self to the Soul in its own name and nature, as Error; but in the name and dress of Truth; and under that notion binds the Conscience, and vigorously influences the passions and affections; and then being more indul­gent to lust than Truth is, it is for that so much the more embraced and hugg'd by the deceived soul, Acts 22. 4, 5. The heat that Error puts the soul into, differs from Religious Zeal, as a Feverish doth from a Natural heat, which is not indeed so be­nign and agreeable, but much more fer­vent and scorching. A mind under the [Page 15] power of Error, is restless and impatient to propagate its Errors to others, and these heats prey upon, and eat up the vi­tal Spirits and Powers of Religion.

Sixth Observation.

'Tis exceeding difficult to get out Error, when once it is imbib'd, and hath rooted it self by an open profession.

Errors, like some sorts of Weeds, ha­ving once seeded in a Field or Garden, 'tis scarce possible to subdue and destroy them, especially if they be hereditary Errors, or have grown up with us from our youth; à teneris assuescere multum est, faith Seneca; 'tis a great advantage to Truth or Error, to have an early and long possession of the mind. The Pharisees held many erroneous opinions about the Law, as appears by their corruptive Com­mentaries upon it, refuted by Christ, Matth. 5. but did he root them out of their heads and hearts thereby? No, no; they sooner rid him out of the world. The Sadduces held a most dangerous Er­ror about the Resurrection; Christ dispu­ted with them to the admiration of o­thers; and proved it clearly against them; and yet we find the Error remain­ing [Page 16] long after Christ's Death, 2 Tim. 2. 18. The Apostles themselves had their minds tinctured with this Error, That Christ should be outwardly great and magnificent in the world, and raise his Followers to great Honours and Prefer­ments amongst men: Christ plainly told them it was their Mistake and Error; for the Son of man came not to be ministred unto, but to minister; yet this did not rid their minds of the Error; it stuck fast in them, even till his Ascension to Heaven. Oh how hard is it to clear the heart of a good man once leaven'd with Error! and much more hard to separate it from a wicked manI am persuaded (saith Mr. Gurnal) some men take more pains to furnish themselves with Arguments to defend some Error they have taken up, than they do for the most saving Truths in the Bible. Austin said, when he was a Manichean, Non Tu eras, sed Error meus erat Deus meus; Thou O Lord, wert not, but my Error was my God. Gurnal's Christian Ar­mour, part 2. page 36.

Some have chose rather to die, than to part with their darling Errors, and Soul­damning Heresies. I have read (saith Mr. Bridges) of a great Atheist, that was burnt at Paris for blaspheming Christ, held fast his Atheistical Opinions till he came to the very stake; boasted to the Priests and Fryars that followed him, [Page 17] how much more confidently he went to sacrifice his life in the strength of reason, under which he suffered, than Christ him­self did; but when he began to feel Tor­ments indeed, then he roared and raged to the purpose. Vidi ego hominem. saith the Author; in hs Life, he was Loose; in his Imprisonments, Sullen; and at his Death, Mad with the Horrors of Conscience.

Some inded have recovered the sound­ness of their Judgments, after deep cor­ruptions by dangerous Errors. Austin was a Manichee, and fully recovered from it. So have many more; and yet multi­tudes hold them fast even to death, and nothing but the Fire can reveal their work, and discover what is Gold, and what is Straw and Stubble.

Seventh Observation.

It deserves a Remark,That men are not so circumspect and jealous of the corrup­tion of their minds by Errors, as they are of their bodies in times of Contagion; or of their lives with respect to gross immo­ralities.

Spiritual dangers affect us less than corporeal; and intellectual evils less than moral. Whether this be the effect of Hypo­crisie, [Page 18] the Errors of the mind being more secret and invisible than those of the Con­versation, God only knows, man cannot positively determine.

Or whether it be the effect of Igno­rance, that men think there is less sin and danger in the one than in the other; not considering that an Apoplexy seizing the Head, is every way as mortal, as a Sword piercing the Body: And that a Vertigo will as much unfit a man for service, as an Ague or Feaver: The Apostle in 2 Pet. 2. 1. calls them [...], dam­nable Heresies, or Heresies of Destructi­on. An Error in the mind may be as damning and destructive to the Soul, as an Error of Immorality or Profaneness in the Life.

Or whether it may come to pass from some remains of fear and tenderness in the Conscience, which forbids men to re­duce their erroneous Principles into Pra­ctice; the relying under many confident Errors in the mind▪ a [...] secret Jealousie, which we call formido oppositi, which will not suffer them to act to the full height of their professed opinions. Austin gives this Character even of Pelagius himself, Retract. lib. 2. cap. 33. Nomen Pelagii non sine laude aliqua posui, quia vita ejus a [Page 19] multis praedicabatur: I have not mention­ed (saith he) the name of that man, without some praise, because his life was famed by many. And of Swinkfeldius it is said, Caput regulatum illi defuit, corbonum non defuit: His Heart was much more regular than his Head. Yet this falls out but rarely in the world; for loose Principles naturally run into loose Practi­ses; and the Errors of the Head into the Immoralities of Life.

Eighth Observation.

It is a great Iudgment of God, to be given over to an erroneous mind.

For the Understanding being the lead­ing Faculty, as that guides, the other Powers and Affections of the Soul fol­low, as Horses in a Teem follow the Fore-horse. Now how sad and dangerous a thing is this, for Satan to ride the Fore-horse, and guide that, that is to guide the life of man? That's a dreadful, spiritual, judicial stroke of God, which we read of Rom. 1. 26. [...]; God by a penal Tradition suffered them to run into the dregs of Im­morality, and Pollutions of life; and that because they abused their light, and be­came [Page 20] came vain in their imaginations, ver. 21.

Wild whimsies and fancies in the head, usually mislead men into the puddle and mire of Prophaneness, and then 'tis com­monly observed God sets some visible mark of his Displeasure upon them; es­pecially the Heresiarchs, or Ring-leaders in Error. Nestorius his Tongue was consu­med by Worms. Cerinthus his Brains Knock'd out by the Fall of an House. Montanus hang [...]d himself: It were easie to instance in multitudes of others, whom the visible Hand of God hath marked for a warning to others; but usually the spi­ritual Errors of the Mind are followed with a Consumption and Decay of Re­ligion in the Soul. If Grace be in the Heart, where Error sways its Scepter in the Head, yet usually there it languishes and withers. They may mistake their Dropsie, for growth and flourishing, and think themselves to be more spiritual, because more airy and notional; but if men would judg themselves impartially, they will certainly find that the Seeds of Grace thrive not in the Heart, when sha­ded and over-dropt by an erroneous Head.

Ninth Observation.

'Tis a pernicious Evil, to advance a meer O­pinion into the place and seat of an Ar­ticle of Faith; and to lay as great a stress upon it, as they ought to do upon the most clear and fundamental Point. To be as much concerned for a Tile upon the Roof, as for the Corner-stone, which unites the Walls, and sustains the Building.

Opinion (as one truly saith) is but Reason's Projector, and the Spy of Truth: It makes in its fullest discovery no more than the dawning and twilight of Knowledg; and yet I know not how it comes to pass, but so it is, that this Idol of the Mind holds such a sway and Empire over all we hold, as if it were all the Day we had. Matters of mere opinion, are every where cried up by some Errorists, for Mathematical De­monstration, and Articles of Faith, writ­ten with a Sun-beam; worshipping the Fancies and Creatures of their own minds, more than God; and putting more trust in their ill-founded Opinions, than in the surer word of Prophecy. Much like that Humorist that would not [Page 22] trust day-light, but kept his Candle still burning by him; because (said he) this is not as subject to Eclipses, as the Sun is.

And what more frequent, when Con­troversies grow fervent, than for those that maintain the Error, to boast every silly Argument to be a Demonstration; to upbraid and pity the blindness and dul­ness of their Opposers, as men that shut their eyes against Sun-beams; yea, some­times to draw their presumptuous Cen­sures through the very hearts of their Opposers, and to insinuate that they must needs hold the Truths of God in unrigh­teousness, sin against their knowledg, and that nothing keeps them from co­ming over to them, but Pride, Shame, or some Worldly Interest? What a compli­cated evil is here! Here's a proud exalt­ing of our own opinions, and an immo­dest imposing on the minds of others more clear and sound than our own, and a dangerous Usurpation of God's Prero­gative in judging the hearts and ends of our Brethren.

Tenth Observation.

Error being conscious to it self of its own weakness, and the strong assaults that will [Page 23] be made upon it, evermore labours to de­fend and seeure it self under the wings of Antiquity, Reason, Scripture, and high pretensions to Reformation and Piety.

Antiquity is a venerable word, but ill used, when made a cloak for Error. Truth must needs be elder than Error, as the Rule must necessarily be, before the ab [...]rration from it. The gray hairs of Opinions are then only Beauty, and a Crown, when found in the way of Righteousness. Copper (saith Learned Dumoulin) will never become Gold by Age. A Lye will be a Lye, let it be ne­ver so ancient. We dispute not by Years, but by Reasons drawn from Scripture. That which is now call'd an Ancient O­pinion, if it be not a true Opinion, was once but a new Error. When you can tell us how many years are required to turn an Error into Truth, then we will give more heed to Antiquity, when press'd in the service of Error, than we now think due to it.

If Antiquity will not do, Reason shall be press'd to serve Error's turn at a dead lift; and indeed the Pencil of Reason can lay curions Colours upon rotten Tim­ber, [Page 24] and varnish over erroneous Princi­ples with fair and plausible pretences. What expert Artists have the Socinians proved themselves in this matter? But because men are bound to submit human Authority and Reason to Divine Revela­tion, both must give way and strike sail to the Written Word.

Hence it comes to pass, that the great Patrons and Factors for Error, do above all things labour to gain countenance to their Errors from the Written Word; and to this end they manifestly wrest and rack the Scriptures to make them subservient to their Opinions; not impartially study­ing the Scriptures first, and forming their notions and opinions according to them; but they bring their Erroneous Opinions to the Scriptures, and then with all ima­ginable art and sophistry wiredraw and force the Scriptures to countenance and legitimate their OpinionsCum u­naquaeque Haeresis sui commenti parentem habeat Diabolum, ac pudore tàm exosi nominis teneatur; pulcherrimum, & quod super omnia est, nomen Salvatoris profitetur, Scripturarumque dictionibus amici­tur, Athanas. contra Arian

But because pretences of Piety andTake heed (saith one) that when Zeal for Reformation knocks at the door, some new Errors step nor in with it, which will as much need an after Reformation. Re­formation [Page 25] are the strokes that give life to the face of this Idol, and give it the nearest resemblance unto Truth, these therefore never fail to be made use of, and zealously professed in the favour of Error, though there be little of either many times to be found in their Persons, and nothing at all in the Doctrines that lay claim to it.

Eleventh Observation.

God in all ages in his tender care for his Churches and Truths, hath still qualified and excited his Servants for the defence of his precious Truths, against the Er­rors and Heresies that have successively assaulted them.

As Providence is observed in every Climate and Island of the World to have provided Antidotes against the poisonous Plants and Animals of the Countrey; and the one is never far from the other: So is the care of his Providence much more conspicuous in the case now before us. When, or wheresoever venomous Errors and deadly Heresies do arise, he hath his servants at hand with Antidotes against them.

[Page 26] When Arrius, that cunning and deadly Enemy to the Deity of Christ, struck at the very heart of our Religion, Faith and Comfort; a man of subtil Parts, and Blameless Life, which made his Heresie much the more spreading and taking; the Lord had his well-furnished Athanasius in a readiness to resist and con­found him. And as he had his Athana­sius to defend the Deity of Christ; so he wanted not his Basil to defend the Do­ctrine of the Holy Spirit against Macedo­nius.

so when Pelagius was busily advan­cing Free-will into the Throne of Free-grace, Providence wanted not its Mal­let in Learned and Ingenious Augustin, to break him and his Idol to pieces: And it is highly remarkable (as the Learned Dr. Hill observes) that Augustin was born in Africa the same day that Pelagius was born in Brittain.

When Gotteschalcus published his dan­gerous Doctrine about Predestination, the Lord drew forth Hincmarus to detect and confute that Error, by evincing clearly, that God's Predestination forces no man to Sin.

So from the beginning and first rise of Popery, that centre and sink of Errors, [Page 27] we have a large Catalogue of the Learn­ed and Famous Witnesses, which in all Ages have faithfully resisted and opposed it; and when notwithstanding all, it had even over-run Europe like a rapid Torrent, or rather Inundation of the O­cean: And Germany was brought to that pass, that if the Pope had but Comman­ded it, they would have eaten Grass or Hay more pecudum. Then did the Lord bring forth Invincible Luther, and with him a troop of Learned Champions, into the field against him; since which time the Cause of Popery is become desperate.

Thus the care of Providence in all ages hath been as much displayed in protect­ing the Church against the dangers that arose from false Brethren within it, as from avowed persecuting Enemies with­out it; and had it not been so, the rank Weeds of Heresies and Errors had long since overtopt and choaked the Corn, and made the Church a barren [...]Field.

Twelfth Observation.

The want of a modest Suspition, and just re­flection, gives both confidence and growth to Erroneous Opinions.

[Page 28] If matters of meer Opinion were kept in their proper place, under the careful guard of Suspition; they would not make that bustle and confusion in the Churches, they have done, and do at this day.

'Tis confessed, that all Truths are not matters of meer Opinion; neither are all Opinions of equal weight and value; and therefore not to be left hanging in an equipendious Scepticisme: And yet it is as true, that matrers of Opinion o [...]ght carefully to be sorted from matters of Faith, and to be kept in their own rank and class, as things doubtful, quibus po­test subesse falsum; whilst matters of Faith clearly revealed, are to stand upon their own sure and firm Basis. The for­mer, viz. matters of meer Opinion, we are so to hold, as upon clearer light to be ready to part with them, and give them up into the hands of Truth. The other, viz. matters of Faith, we are to hold with resolutions to Live and Dye by them.

What is Opinion, but the wavering of the understanding betwixt probable Arguments, for and against a point of Doctrine? So that it's rather an incli­nation, than an assertion, as being ac­companied [Page 29] with Fear, Floating. and In­constancy. In such cases there should be a due concession and allowance of other mens Opinions to them, and why not, whilst they offer as fair for the Truth as we? And haply their Parts, Helps, and Industries, arenot inferior to ours, it may be beyond them, and we may discern in them as much tenderness of Conscience, and fear of Sin as in our selves. In this case a little more modest Suspicion in our Opinions, would do the Church a great deal of right; and that which should pre­vail with all modest persons to exercise it, is the just reflection they may make upon their own former confident mi­stakes.

Thirteenth Observation.

There is a remarkable involution or concate­nation of Errors, one linking in, and drawing another after it.

Amongst all Erroneous Sects, there is still some [...], some Helena, for whose sake the war against Truth is commenced; and the other lesser Er­rors are press'd for the sake and service of this leading darling Error. As we see [Page 30] the whole [...] R. Ecclesiae subjicien­da esse omnia summo ju­dicio & tribunali Ecclesiae, cui praeest Papa, &c. indè con­ficitur immotas habendas esse traditiones omnes R. Ecclesiae, dogmata omnia, decreta seu Pontificum seu Conciliorum. Fred. Spanhem. Elench. Controv. p. 51. Troop of Indulgences, Bulls, Masses, Pilgrimages, Purgatory, with multitudes more, flow from, and are press'd into the Service of the Pope's Su­premacy and Infallibility. So in other Sects, men are forc [...]d to entertain many other Errors, which in themselves con­sidered, they have no great kindness for; but they are necessitated to entertain them in defence of that great, leading darling Opinion they first espoused.

Those that cry up and trumpet abroad the Soveraign power of Free-will, even without the preventing Grace of God, enabling men to supernatural works, as if the Will alone had escaped all damage by the Fall, and Adam had not sinned in that noble Virgin-faculty. To defend this Idol, which is the [...], they are forced to oppugn and deny several other great and weighty Truths, as par­ticular eternal Election, the certainty of the Saints Perseverance, the necessity of preventing Grace in Conversion; which Errors are but the outworks raised in de­fence of that Idol.

[Page 31] So in the Baptismal Controversie, men would never have adventured to deny God's Covenant with Abraham, to be a Covenant of Grace; or to assert the Cere­monial Law, so full of Christ, to be an Adam's Covenant of works; and Circum­cision, expresly called the seal of the Righ­teousness of Faith, to be the condition of A­dam's Covenant. Much less would they place all the elect of God in Israel, at one and the same time, under the severest Curse and Rigor of the Law, and under the pure Convenant of Grace, were they not forced into these Errors and Absurdi­ties by dint of Argument, in defence of their darling Opinion.

Fourteenth Observation.

Errors abound most, and spring fastest in the times of the Churches Peace, Liberty, and outward Prosperity under Indulgent Rulers. Arrius A­lexandrinus Haeresin insanam incipit Alexandriae sub annum Domini 324, ut Eusebius Anno Imperii Constantini 15. Arrianism sprang up underConstantine's mild Government.

Christian benevolent Rulers are choice Mercies and Blessings to the Church. Such as rule over men in the fear of God, are to the Church, as well as Civil State, [Page 32] like the light of the morning, when the Sun ariseth, even a morning without Clouds, as the tender Grass springing out of the earth by clear shining after rain, 2 Sam. 23. 4.

But this as well as other mercies, is lia­ble to abuse; and under the influences of indulgent Governours, Error as well as Truth, springs up, flowers, and seeds. Persecution gives check to the wanton­ness of mens Opinions, and finds them other and better work to do. Caterpillars and Locusts are swept away by the bitter East-winds, but swarm in Halcyon days, and fall upon every green thing. So that the Church rides in this respect more safe­ly in the stormy Sea, than in the calm Harbour. Peace and Prosperity is apt to cast its Watchmen into a sleep, and whilst they sleep, the envious one soweth Tares, Matth. 13. 25.

'Twas under Constantine's benign Go­vernment that Poison was poured out in­to the Churches. The abuse of such an excellent mercy provokes the Lord to cut it short, and cause the Clouds to ga­ther again after the Rain. We have found it so once and again (alas! that I must say again), in this wanton and foolish Nation. Professors could live quietly together, Converse, Fast, and [Page 33] pray in a Christian manner together under common Calamities and Dangers; diffe­rences in Opinion were suspended by con­sent. But no sooner do we feel a warm Sun-blast of Liberty and Peace, but it re­vives and heats our dividing Lusts and Corruptions, instead of our Graces. The Sheep of Christ fight with each other, though their furious pushing one at ano­ther is known to presage a change of Weather.

Fifteenth Observation.

Errors in the tender bud and first spring of them, are comparatively shy and mo­dest, to what they prove afterwards, when they have spread and rooted them­selves into the minds of multitudes, and think it time to set up and justle for themselves in the World Eunomius haeresin suam (communicato Consilio cum Eudoxio) aliquamdiù occultè & intricatè ac perplexè sparsit; tandem animo sumpto, quae haere­ticè sentiret, in coetibus publicis palam ostendit. Theodoret. lib. 2. cap. 29.

They usually begin in modest Scru­ples, conscientious Doubts and Queries. But having once gotten many Abetters, and amongst them some that have subtilty and ability to plead and dispute their [Page 34] Cause, they ruffle it out at another rate; glory in their numbers, piety and ability of their Party; boast and glory in the conceited Victories they have atchieved over their Opposers. The Masque drops off its face, and it appears with a brow of Brass, becomes insolent and turbulent both in Church and State. Of which it is easie to give many pregnant instances, in the Arians of old, and more recent Er­rors, which I shall not at present be con­cerned with, lest I exasperate, whilst I seek to heal the Wound.

The Donatists in Au­gustin's time madestly moved, that men might [...]ot be com­pel [...]'d to live holy. Coacta & in vita pietas, they mention'd it with deslike; but when grown in power, facti insolentes vim Or­thodoxis inferebant, inso­much that Dulcitius the Tribune was feign to defend the orthodox against them with an Army. Should a man hear the Sermons, or private Dis­courses of Errorists, whilst the Design is but forming and projecting, he should meet with little to raise his jealousie. They speak in Generals, and guard their Discourses with politick Reserves. You shall not see, tho you see to see, the tendency of their Discourses. Hence the Apostle saith, 2 per. 2. 1. [...], They shall privily (or covertly) bring in damnable Heresies: As the Boy in Plutarch, being asked by a Stranger, what is that you carry so closely under [Page 35] your Cloak? wittily answered, You may well know that I intend you shall not know it, by my so carrying it.

Sixteenth Observation.

Nothing gives more countenance and in­crease to Error, than a weak and feeble defence of the Truth against it. Quidam verò non satìs coelestibus literis eruditi, cùm veritatis accusatoribus re­spondere non possent, objicientibus, vel impossibile, vel incon­gruens esse, ut Deus in uterum se mulieris includeret, &c. quae omnia cùm neque ingenio, neque doctrinâ defendere ac refutare possent (nec enim vim rationèmque penitùs pervidebant) depra­vati sunt ab itinere recto, & coelestes literas corrupêrunt, ut no­vam sibi doctrinam sine ullâ radice ac stabilitate componerent. Lactan. lib. 4. cap. 30. De Haeresibus.

The strength of Error lieth much in the weakness of the Advocates and De­fendants of Truth. Every Friend of Truth is not fit to make a Champion for it. Ma­ny love it, and pray for it, that cannot de­fend and dispute for it. I can dye for the Truth (said the Martyr) but I cannot dispute for it. Zuinglius blamed Carolostadius for undertaking the Controversie of that Age, because (said he) non habuit satìs humerorum, his shoulders were too weak for the burthen.

It can be said of few, as Cicero speaks of one, Nullam unquàm in disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probârit; nullum [Page 36] oppugnavit, quem non everterit; He un­dertook no Cause in disputation, which he could not defend; he opposed no Adversa­ry, but could overthrow him. He is a rare and happy Disputant, who can clear and carry every point of Truth, of which he undertakes the defence. 'Twere happy for the Church, if the abilities and pru­dence of all her Friends were commen­surate and equal to their love and Zeal. Every little foyl, every weak or imperti­nent Answer of a Friend to Truth, is quickly turned into a weapon to wound in the deeper.

Seventeenth Observation.

Errors of Iudgment are not cured by com­pulsion and external force, but by ratio­nal conviction, and proper spiritual Re­medies.

Bodily sufferings rather spread than cure intellectual Errors. I deny not but fundamental Heresies breaking forth into open Blasphemies against God, and Sedi­tions in the Civil State, ought to be re­strained. 'Tis no way fit men should be permitted to go up and down the World with Plague-sores running upon them. Nor do I understand why men [Page 37] should be more cautious to preserve their Bodies than their Souls. But I speak here of such Errors as may consist with the foundations of the Christian Faith, and are not destructive to Civil Govern­ment. They take the ready way to spread and perpetuate them, that think to root them out of the World by such improper and unwarrantable means as external force and violence. The Wind never causes and Earth-quake, till it be pent in, and restrained from motion.

We neither find, nor can imagine, That those Church or State Exorcists should ever be able to effect their end, who think to confine all the Spirits of Er­ror within the Circle of a severe Unifor­mity. Fires, Prisons, Pillories, Stig­matizings, &c. are the Popish Topicks to confute Errors. 'Tis highly remarkable, that the World long ago consented for the avoiding of dissenting judgment, to en­slave themselves and their Posterity to the most fatal and destructive Heresie that ever it groaned under.

'Tis a rational and proper Observation long since made by Lactantius, Quis mihi imponat necessitatem credendi, quod nolim, vel non credendi, quod velim? Who can [Page 38] force me to believe what I will not, or not to believe what I will? The rational and gentle Spirit of the Gospel is the only proper and effectual method to cure the Diseases of the Mind.

Eighteenth Observation.

Erroneous Doctrines producing Divisions and fierce Contentions amongst Christians, prove a fatal Stumbling-block to the World; fix their Prejudices, and ob­struct their conversion to Christ. Many Enemies to Christianity flockt to the Nicene Synod, odio Christianorum, propter abolitam Gentilium superstitionem, ut haberent in quos illude­rent. Say the Centurists.

They dissolve the lovely union of the Saints, and thereby scare off the World from coming into the Church. This is evidently implied in that Prayer of Christ, Iohn 17. That all his People might be one, that the World might believe the Father had sent him. There is indeed no just cause for any to take offence at the Christian Reformed Religion, be­cause so many Errors and Heresies spring up among the Professors of it, and divide them into so many Sects and Parties: for in all this we find no more than what was [Page 39] predicted from the beginning, 1 Cor. 11. 18, 19. I hear there be divisions among you, and I partly believe it: for there must be also Heresies among you, &c. And again, Acts 20. 30. Also of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away Disciples after them. Ante omnia, sci­re nos convenit, & ipsum, & legatos ejus praedixisse, quòd pluri­mae Sectae, & Haereses deberent existere, quae concordiam sancti corporis rumperent: ac mo [...]isse, ut summâ prudentiâ cavere­mus, ne quando in laqueos & fraudes illius adversarii nostri cum quo nos Deus Iuctari voluit, incideremus. Lactan. lib. 4. cap. 30.

The very same things strongly confirm the Christian Religion, which wicked men improve to the reproach and preju­dice of it. When Celsus objected to the Christians the variety and contrariety of their Opinions; saying, Were we willing to turn Christians, we know not of what Party to be, seeing you all pretend to Christ, and yet differ so much from one another. Tertullian, the Christian Apologist, made him this wise and pertinent Reply, Hae­reses non dolemus venisse, quia novimus esse praedictas. We are not troubled that Heresies are come, seeing it was predicted that they must come. These things de­stroy not the credibility of the Christian Religion, but increase and confirm it, [Page 40] by evidencing to the World the truth and certainty of Christ's Predictions (which were quite beyond all human foresight) that as soon as his Doctrine should be propagated, and a Church raised by it, Errors and Heresies should spring up a­mong them for the tryal of their Faith and Constancy.

Nevertheless, this no way excuses the sinfulness of Errors and Divisions in the Church. Christ's Prediction neither in­fuses, nor excuses the Evil predicted by him: for what he elsewhere speaks of Scandals, is as true in this case of Errors. These things must come to pass, but wo be to that man by whom they come.

Ninteenth Observation.

How specious and taking soever the pre­tences of Error be, and how long soever they maintain themselves in esteem a­mong men, they are sure to end in the loss and shame of their Authors and A­betters at last. Post foe­dum Arii obirum, quamplurimos ex iis, qui ab Ario priùs decepti fuerant, ad sanitatem rediisse, scribit Athanasius, ad Serapion [...]m▪

Truth is a Rock, the waves of Error that dash against, evermore return in [Page 41] froth and foam: yea, they foam out their own shame, saith the Apostle, Iud. 13. What Tacitus spake of crafty Counsels, I may as truly apply to crafty Errors, Consilia callida primâ specie laeta, tractatu dura, eventu tristia: They are pleasant in their beginnings, difficult in their manage­ment, and sad in their event and issue.

Suppose a man have union with Christ, yet his Errors are but so much Hay, Wood, Straw, Stubble built, or rather endeavoured to be built upon a foundation of Gold: this the fiery tryal burns up; the Author of them suffers loss; and though himself may be saved, yet so as by fire, 1 Cor. 3. 12, 13, 14, 15. the meaning is, he makes a narrow escape. As a man that leaps out of an House on fire, from a Window or Battle­ment, with great difficulty saves his life; just so Errorists shall be glad to quit their Erroneous Opinions, which they have taken so much pains to build, and draw others into: and then, oh what a shame must it be for a good man to think, how many days and nights have I worse than wasted, to defend and propagate an Er­ror, which might have been employed in a closer study of Christ and mine own heart! Keckerman relates a Story of a vo­cal [Page 42] Statue, which was thirty years a ma­king by a cunning Artist, [...]eck. Phys. p. 16. Albertus magnus. which by the motion of its Tongue with little Wheels, Wires, &c. could articulate the sound, and pronounce an entire Sentence. This Statue saluting Aquinas, surprized him, and at one stroke he utterly destroyed the curious Machin, which exceedingly trou­bled the fond Owner of it, and made him say with much concernment, Vno ict [...] opus trigint a annorum destruxisti, thou hast at one stroke destroyed the study and labour of thirty years.

Beside, What shame and trouble must it be to the zealous Promoters of Errors, not only to cast away so vainly and un­profitably their own time and strength, which is bad enough: but also to ensnare and allure the Souls of others into the same, or worse mischief? for though God may save and recover you, those that have been misled by you may perish.

Twentieth Observation.

If ever Errors be cured, and the Peace and Vnity of the Church established, men must be convinced of, and acquainted with the Occasions and Causes both with­in and without themselves, from whence [Page 43] their Errors do proceed; and must both know and apply the proper Rules and Re­medies for the prevention or cure of them.

There is much difference betwixt an Occasion, and a proper Cause; these two are heedfully to be distinguished. Criti­cal and exact Historians, as Polybius and Tacitus, distinguish betwixt the [...], and the [...], the beginning Occasions, and the real Causes of a War; and so we ought in this case of Errors carefully to distinguish them. The most excellent and innocent things in the World, such as the Scriptures of Truth, the Liberty of Christians, the Tranquility and Peace of the Church (as you will hear anon) may, by the Subtilty of Satan working in conjunction with the Corruptions of mens hearts, become the Occasions, but can never be the proper culpable Causes of Errors.

Accordingly having made the twenty Remarks upon the Nature and Growth of Errors (which cannot so well be brought within the following Rules of method) I shall in the next place proceed in the discovery both of the mere Occasion, as also of the proper culpable Causes of Er­rors, [Page 44] together with the proper Preven­tives and most effectual Remedies placed together in the following order.

The Occasion.

The holy God, who is a God of Truth,DIVINE PERMIS­SION. Deut. 32. 4. and hateth Errors, Rev. 2. 6. the God of Order, and hates Confusions and Schisms in his Church, 1 Cor. 14. 33. is yet pleased to permit Errors and Heresies to arise, without whose permission they could never spring. And this he doth for the tryal of his Peoples Faith and Con­stancy, and for a spiritual punishment upon some men for the abuse of his known Truths; and by the permission of these Evils he advanceth his own Glo­ry, and the good of his Church and Peo­ple. Augustine answers that Question, Why doth not God, since he hates Er­rors, sweep them out of the World? Be­cause (saith he) it is an act of greater power to bring good out of evil, than not to suffer Evils to be at all.

Satan's Design in Errors is to cloud and darken God's Name and precious Truths; to destroy the Beauty, Strength, and Or­der of the Church. But God's ends in permitting and sending Errors, are (1.) to plague and punish men for their abuse of [Page 45] Light, 2 Thess. 2. 11. For this cause God shall send them strong Delusions, &c. (2.) To prove and try the Sincerity and Constan­cy of our hearts, Deut. 13. 1, 3. I Cor. 11. 19. And lastly, By these things the Saints are awakened to a more diligent search of the Scriptures, which are the more criti­cally read and examined upon the tryal of Spirits and Doctrines by them, 1 Ioh. 4. 1. Believe not every Spirit, but try the Spi­rits; And Rev. 2. 2. Thou hast tried them, that say they are Apostles, &c.

The Prevention.

Though Heresies and Errors must (for the Reasons assigned) break forth into the World, and God will turn them eventually into his own glory, and the benefit of his Church: yet it is a dread­ful judgment to be delivered over to a spi­rit Error, to eb the Authors and Abet­ters of them; this is a judicial stroke of God: and as ever we hope to escape, and stand clear out of the way of it, let us carefully shun these three following Causes and Provocations thereof.

(1.) Want of love to the Truth, which God hath made to shine about us in the means, or into us by actual illu­mination under the means of knowledge. [Page 46] 2 Thess. 2. 10, 11. Because they received not the love of Truth, God gave them up to strong Delusions. They are justly plagued with Error that slight Truth. False Doctrines are fit Plagues for false Hearts.

(2.) Beware of Pride and Wantonness of Mind. 'Tis not so much the Weak­ness as the Wantonness of the Mind, which provokes God to inflict this Judg­ment. None likelier to make Seducers than Boasters, Iude 16. Arrius gloried that God had revealed some things to him, which were hidden from the Apo­stles themselves. Simon Magus boasted himself to be the mighty Power of God. The erroneous Pharisees loved the praises of Men. When the Papist reproached Luther that he affected to have his Disci­ples called Lutherans, he replyed, Non sic, ô fatue, non sic; oro ut nomen meum taceatur: he disdain'd that the Children of Christ should be called by so vile a name as his.

(3.) Beware you neglect not Prayer, to be kept sound in your Judgments, and guided by the Spirit into all Truth, Psal. 119. 10. With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander, or err, from thy Commandments. This do, and [Page 47] you are safe from such a judicial Tra­dition.

The First Cause.

We shall next speak of the Causes of Error found in the evil Dispositions of the Subjects, which prepare and incline them to receive Erroneous Doctrine and Opinions, and even catch at the Occa­sions and least Sparkles of Temptation, as dry Tinder: and amongst these is found,

(1.) A perverse wrangling Humour at the pretended OBSCURITY of the Scriptures. The Romish Party snatch at this Occasion, and make it the proper Cause, when indeed it is but a pickt Oc­casion, of the Errors and Mistakes among men. They tell us the Scriptures are so difficult, obscure, and perplext, that if private men will trust to them as their only Guide, they will inevitably run into Errors, and their only relief is to give up their Souls to the conduct of their Church; whereas indeed the true Cause of Error is not so much in the Obscurity of the Word, as in the corruption of the mind, 1 Tim. 6. 5. 2 Tim. 3. 8.

We do acknowledge there are in the Scriptures, [...], [Page 48] some things hard to be understood▪ 2 Pet. 3. 16. the sublime and mysterious nature of the matter rendering it so: and some things hard to be interpreted from the manner of expression; as indeed all mystical parts of Scripture and Propheti­cal predictions are, and ought to be deli­vered. The Spirit of God this way de­signedly casts a veil over them, till the proper season of their revelation and ac­complishment be come. Besides (as the Learned Glassius observes) in Paul's style there are found some peculiar words and forms of speech, which ordinary Rules of Grammar take no notice, nor give any parallel Examples of: as to be buried with Christ; to be baptized into his death; to which I may add, to be circumcised in him, &c. There are also multitude of words found in Scripture of various and vastly different Significations: and ac­cordingly there is a diversity, and some­times a contrariety of senses given of them by Expositors; which to an Hu­mourist or quarrelsome Wit gives an occa­sion to vent his Errors with a plausible appearance of Scripture-consent. And indeed Tertullian saith, Non periclitor di­cere ipsas Scripturas ità dispositas esse, ut materiam subministrarent Haereticis. The [Page 49] Scriptures are so disposed, that He­reticks may pick Occasions; and those that will not be satisfied, may be har­dened. See Mark 4. 11, 12.

But all this notwithstanding, the great and necessary things to our Salvation are so perspicuously and plainly revealed in the Scriptures, that even Babes in Christ do apprehend and understand them, Matth. 11. 25. 1 Cor. 1. 27, 28, 29. And though there be difficulties in other points more remote from the foundation; yet the Spirit of God is not to be accused, but rather his Wisdom to be admired herein. For (1.) this serves to excite our most intense study and diligence, which by this difficulty is made necessa­ry, Prov. 2. 3, 4, 5. the very Prophets, yea the very Angels search into these things, 1 Pet. 1. 11, 12. (2.) Hereby a standing Ministry in the Church is made necessary, Nehem. 8. 8. Eph. 4. 11, 12, 13. So that to pretend Obscurity of Scripture to be the culpable cause of Error, when indeed the fault is in our selves; this is too much like our Father Adam, which would implicitly accuse God, to exc [...]se himself; he laid it upon the Woman which God gave him, and we upon the Scriptures which God hath given us.

The Remedies.

The proper Remedies and Preventives in this case are an heedful attendance to, and practice of these Rules.

Rule I.

Let all obscure and difficult Texts of Scripture be constantly examined and ex­pounded according to the Analogy or proportion of Faith, which is St. Paul's own Rule, Rom. 12. 6. Let him that prophesieth, (i. e. expoundeth the Scri­pture in the Church) do it according to the proportion of faith. The Analogy or proportion of Faith is what is taught plainly and uniformly in the whole Scri­ptures of Old and New Testament, as the rule of our Faith and Obedience. Whilst we carefully and sincerely attend hereunto, we are secured from sinful cor­rupting the word of God. Admit of no sense which interfereth with this propor­tion of Faith. If men have no regard to this, but take liberty to rend off a sin­gle Text from the body of Truth to which it belongs, and put a peculiar in­terpretation upon it which is absonous and discordant to other Scriptures, what woful work will they quickly make?

[Page 51] Give but a Papist liberty to take that Scripture, Iam. 2. 24. out of the frame of Scripture, A man is justified by works, and not by faith only; and expo [...]d it without regard to the Tenor of the Go­spel-doctrine of Iustification in Paul's E­pistles to the Romans and Galatians, and a gross Error starts up immediately. Give but a Socinian the like liberty to practise upon Iohn 14. 28. and a gross H [...]resie shall presently look with an Orthodox face.

Rule II.

Never put a new sense upon words of Scripture in favour of your preconceived Notions and Opinions, nor wrest it from its general and common use and sense. This is not to interpret, but to rack the Scriptures, as that word [...] signi­fies, 2 Pet. 3. 16. Interpretis officium est, non quid ipse velit, sed quid censeat ille, quem interpretatur, exponere, as Hieron. against Ruff. speaks. We are not to make the Scriptures speak what we think, but what the Prophet or Apostle thought, whom we interpret. In 1 Cor. 7. 14. we meet with the word [holy] applied to the Children of Believers; that word is above 500 times used for a [Page 52] state of separation to God: Therefore to make it signify in that place nothing but Legitimacy, is a bold and daring practising upon the Scripture.

Rule III.

Whenever you meet with an obscure place of Scripture, let the Context of that Scripture be diligently and through­ly searched; for 'tis usual with God to set up some light there to guide us through the obscurity of a particular Text. And there is much truth in the Observation of the Rabbines, Nulla est objectio in Lege, quae non habet solutionem in l [...]tere. There's no scruple or objection in the Law, but it hath a solution at the side of it.

Rule IV.

Let one Testament freely cast its light upon the other; and let not men under­value or reject an Old Testament Text, as no way useful to clear and establish a New-Testament Point of Faith or Duty. Each Testament reflects light upon the other. The Iews reject the New-Testa­ment, and many among us sinfully slight the Old: But without the help of both, we can never understand the mind of [Page 53] God [...] in either. 'Tis a good Rule in the Civil-Law, Turpe est de Lege judicare, to­ta lege nondum inspectâ. We must inspect the whole Law, to know the sense of any particular Law.

Rule V.

Have a due regard to that sense given of obscure places of Scripture, which hath not only the current sense of Learn­ed Expositors, but also naturally agrees with the scope of the place. A careless neglect and disregard to this, is justly blamed by the Apostle, 1 Tim. 1. 7.

Cause II.

A Second evil temper in the Subject, disposing and inclining men to receive and suck in erroneous Doctrines and Opinions,Contro­versiae A­nabaptisti­cae exortae sunt supe­riore sae­culo vari­is in Euro­pae locis, puta à Muntzero Saxone cum Sociis Anno MDXXI. occasio­ne scripti Lutheri de libertate Christianâ, Fred. Spanh. Elench. Contr. p. 95. is the ABVSE of that just and due CHRISTIAN LIBERTY allowed by Christ to all his people to read, ex­amine, and judge the sense of Scriptures with a private judgment of discretion.

This is a glorious acquisition, and blessed fruit of Reformation, to vindi­cate [Page 54] and recover that just Right, and gracious Grant made to us by Christ and the Apostles, out of the injurious hands of our Popish Enemies, who had usurp­ed and invaded it. The exercise of this Liberty, is at once a Duty commanded by Christ, and commended in Scripture. 'Tis commanded by Christ, Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures, saith Christ to the people. 1 Cor. 10. 15. I speak as to wise men; judge you what I say. And the ex­ercise of this private judgment of discre­tion by the people, is highly commend­ed by St. Paul in the Bereans, Acts 17. 11. These were more noble than those in Thes­salonica, in that they received the Word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily whether those things were so. This Liberty is not allowed in that latitude in any Religion, as it is in the Christian Religion, nor enjoyed in its full liberty, as it is in the Reformed Religion, whose glory it is that it allows its Principles and Doctrines to be critical­ly examined and tryed of all Men by the Rule of the Word, as well knowing, the more it is sifted and searched by its Professors, the more they will be still confirmed and satisfied in the truth of it.

[Page 55] But yet this gracious and just liberty of Christians, suffers a double abuse: One from the Popish Enemies, who injurious­ly restrain and deny it to the people. Another, by Protestants themselves, who sinfully stretch and extend it beyond the just degree and measure in which Christ allows it to them.

The Pope injuriously restrains it, dis­cerning the danger that must necessarily follow the concession of such a liberty to the people, to compare his superstitious and erroneous Doctrines with the Rule of the Word.

St. Peter, in 2 Pet. 1. 19. tells the peo­ple they have a more sure Word of Pro­phecy, whereunto they do well that they take heed. Certainly the Pope forgot either that he was Peter's Successour; or that ever St. Peter told the people they did well to make use of that liberty, which he denies them. Mr. Pool tells us of a Spaniard that used this expression to an English Merchant, You people of England (said he) are happy, you have liberty to see with your own eyes, and to ex­amine the Doctrines delivered to you, upon which your everlasting Life depends; but we dare not say our souls are our own, but are commanded to believe whatever our [Page 56] Teachers tell us, be it never so unreason­able or ridiculous. This is a most injuri­ous and sinful restraint upon it on the one side.

And then Secondly, 'Tis too frequent­ly abused, by stretching it beyond Christ's allowance and intendment upon the other side; when every ignorant and confident person shall, under pretence of liberty granted by Christ, rudely break in upon the Sacred Text, distort, vio­late and abuse the Scriptures at pleasure, by putting such strange and [...]oreign sen­ses upon them, as the Spirit of God never meant or intendedProv. 8. 22. Quod dictum scribit Epiphanius, primam Ario praebuisse occasio­nem, haeresin contra filium dei fingendi.

How often have I heard that Scrip­ture, Micha 4. 10. They shall be brought even to Babylon; confidently interpreted, for almost, but not full h [...]me to Babylon, against the very Grammar of the Text, and the Truth of the History? And so again, that place, Isa. 58. 8. The glory of the Lord shall be thy rereward, through ignorance of the word, read re-reward, that is, a double reward to his people? But these are small matters compared with those grosser abuses of Scripture by [Page 57] the ignorant and unlearned, which pre­judice Truth, and too much countenance Popish Reproaches.

The Remedies.

The proper way to prevent and re­medy this mischief, is not by depriving any Man of his just Liberty, either to read, or judge for himself what God speaks in his Word, and think that way to cure Errors; that were the same thing as to cut off the Head to cure an Head­ach. Leave that sinful policy with the false Religion. Let those only that know they do evil, be afraid of coming to the light. But the proper course of pre­venting the mischiefs that come this way, is by labouring to bound and con­tain Christians within those limits Christ himself hath set unto this liberty which he hath granted them. And these are such as follow:

Limitation I.

Tho' Christ have indulged to the meanest and weakest Christian a liberty to read and judge of the Scriptures for himself; yet he hath neither thereby, nor therewith granted him a liberty publickly to Expound and Preach the [Page 58] Word to others: That's quite another thing.

Every Man that can read the Scrip­tures, and judge of their sense, is not thereby presently made Christ's Com­mission-Officer, publickly and authorita­tively to Preach and Inculcate the same to others: Two things are requisite to such an employment, viz. Proper Qua­lifications, 1 Tim. 3. And a solemn Call or designation, Rom. 10. 14, 15. The Ministry is a distinct Office, Acts 20. 17, 28. 1 Thes. 5. 12. and none but qualified and ordained persons can Au­thoritatively Preach the Word, 2 Tim. 1. 6. 1 Tim. 4. 14. 1 Tim. 5. 22.

Christians may privately edify one another by reading the Scriptures, com­municating their sense one to another of them, admonishing, counselling, repro­ving one another in a private fraternal way, at seasons wherein they interfere not with more publick Duties: But for every one that hath confidence enough (and the ignorant usually are best stock'd with it) to assume a liberty with­out due Qualification or Call, to Ex­pound and give the Sense of Scriptures, and pour forth his crude and unstudied Notions, as the pure sense and meaning [Page 59] of God's Spirit in the Scriptures; this is what Christ never allowed, and through this Flood-gate Errors have broken in, and overflowed the Church of God, to the great scandal of Religion, and con­firmation of Popish Enemies.

Limitation II.

Though there be no part of Scripture shut up or restrained from the knowledg or use of any Christian; yet Jesus Christ hath recommended to Christians of dif­ferent abilities, the study of some parts of Scripture rather than others, as more proper and agreeable to their Age and Stature in Religion.

Christians are by the Apostle rank'd in­to three Classes, Fathers, Young-men, and Little Children, 1 Iohn 2. 13. and ac­cordingly the Wisdom of Christ hath di­rected to that sort of food which is pro­per to either: For there is in the Word all sorts of Food suitable to all Ages in Christ; there's both Milk for Babes, and strong Meat for grown Christians, Heb. 5. 13, 14. Those that are unskilful in the Word of Righteousnes, should feed upon Milk, that is, the easie, plain, but most nutritive and pleasant practical Do­ctrines of the Gospel. But strong Meat [Page 60] (saith he) that is, the more abstruse, deep, and mysterious truths, belongeth to them that are of full Age, even those who, by reason of use, have their Senses exercised to discern both good and evil; that is, Truth and Error. To the same purpose he speaks, 1 Cor. 3. 2. I have fed you with milk, and not with meat; for hitherto ye were not able to bear it.

Art thou a weak unstudied Christian? a Babe in Christ? Then the easier, and more nutritive Milk of plain Gospel-Do­ctrine is fitter for thee, and will do thee more good, than the stronger Meat of profound and more mysterious Points; or the Bones of Controversy, which are too hard for thee to deal with.

God hath blessed this Age with great variety of sound and allowed Expositors in our own Language, by the diligent study of which, and prayer for the il­lumination and guidance of the Spirit, you may not only attain unto the true sense and meaning of the more plain and obvious; but also unto gre [...]ter know­ledg, and clearer insight into the more obscure and controverted parts of Scrip­ture.

Cause III.

There is also another evil disposition in the Subject, rendring it easily recep­tive of Errors, and that is spiritual SLOTHFVLNESS and careles­ness in a due and serious search of the whole Scripture, with a sedate and ra­tional consideration of every part and particle therein, which may give us any, though the least light to understand the mind of God in those obscure and diffi­cult points we search after the knowledg of.

Truth lies deep, as the rich Veins of Gold do, Prov. 2. If we will get the treasure, we must not only beg, as he directs, vers. 3. but dig also vers. 4. else as he speaks, Prov. 14. 23. The talk of the lips tends only to poverty. We are not to take up with that which lies upper­most, and next at hand upon the surface of the Text; but to search with the most sedate and considerative mind into all parts of the written Word, examining every Text which hath any respect to the truth we are searching for, heedfully to observe the Scope, Antecedents, and Consequents, and to value every Apex, Tittle, and Iota; for each of these are of [Page 62] Divine Authority, Matt. 5. 18. and some­times greater weight is laid upon a small word, yea, upon the addition or change of a Letter in a word, as appears in the names of Abram and Sarai.

It will require some strength of mind, and great sedulity, to lay all parts of Scripture before us, and to compare words with words, and things with things, as the Apostle speaks, 1 Cor. 2. 13. comparing spiritual things with spiritual. And though it be true that some impor­tant Doctrines, as that of Iustification by Faith, are methodically disposed, and throughly clear'd and setled in one and the same Context; yet it is as true, that very many other points of Faith and Du­ty are not so digested, but are delivered sparsinì, here a little, and there a little, as he speaks, Isa. 28. 10. You must not think to find all that belongs to one Head or Point of Faith, or Duty, lay'd toge­ther in a System, or common place in Scripture; but scattered abroad in seve­ral pieces, some in the Old Testament, and some in the New, at a great distance one from another.

Now in our searches and inquiries af­ter the full and satisfying knowledg of the Will of God in such Points, it is ne­cessary [Page 63] that the whole Word of God be throughly searched, and all those parcels brought together to an interview. Ex. Gr.

If a Man would see the entire disco­very that was made of Christ, to the Fathers, under the Old-Testament, he shall not find it laid together in any one Prophet; but shall find that one speaks to one part of it, and another to ano­ther.

Moses gives the first general hint of it, Gen. 3. 15. The seed of the woman shall break the serpents head. But then if you would know more particularly of whose Seed according to the flesh, he should come, you must turn to Gen. 22. 18. In thy seed (saith God to Abraham) shall all nations of the earth be blessed. And if you yet doubt what Seed God means there, you must go to the Apostle, Gal. 3. 16. To thy seed, which is Christ. If you would further know the place of his Nativity, the Prophet Micha must inform you of that, Mic. 5. 2. it should be Bethlehem-Ephrata. If you inquire of the quality of his Parent, another Prophet gives you that, Isa. 7. 14. Behold, a Virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and call his name Immanuel. If the time of his Birth be [Page 64] inquired after, Moses and Daniel must inform you of that, Gen. 49. 10. Dan. 9. 24.

So under the New-Testament, If a Man inquire about the change of the Sabbath, he must not expect to find a formal re­peal of the Seventh day, and an express institution of the first day in its room; but he is to consider,

First, What the Evangelist speaks, Mark 2. 28. That Christ is Lord of the Sabbath, and so had power, not only to dispense with it, but to change it.

Secondly, That on the first day of the Week Christ rose from the dead, Matt. 28. 1, 2. And that this is that great day, foretold to be the day to be solemnized upon that account, Psal. 118. 24.

Thirdly, That accordingly the first day of the Week is emphatically styled the Lord's day, Rev. 1. 10. where you find his own name written upon it.

Fourthly, You shall find this was the day on which the Apostles and Primitive Christians assembled together for the stated and solemn performance of Pub­lick Worship, Iohn 20. 19. and other publick Church-Acts and Duties, 1 Cor. 16. 1, 2. And so by putting together, and considering all these Particulars, we draw a just Conclusion, That it is the [Page 65] Will of God, that since the Resurrection of Christ, the first day of the week should be observed as the Christian-Sab­bath.

In like manner as for the Baptizing of Believers Infants; We are not to expect it in the express words of a New-Testa­ment-Institution or Command, that In­fants under the Gospel should be Bapti­zed; but God hath left us to gather sa­tisfaction about his Will and our Duty in that point, by comparing and consider­ing the several Scriptures of the Old and New-Testament which relate to that mat­ter; which if we be impartial and consi­derative, we may do,

First, By considering, that by God's express Command, Gen. 17. 9, 10. the Infant Seed of his People were taken in­to Covenant with their Parents, and the then Sign of that Covenant commanded to be applied to them.

Secondly, That though the Sign be al­tered, the Promise and Covenant is still the same, and runs as it did before, to Believers and their Children, Acts 2. 38, 39.

Thirdly, That the foederal holiness of our Children is plainly asserted under the New-Testament, 1 Cor. 7. 14. Rom. 11. 16.

[Page 66] Fourthly, We shall further find, that Baptism succeeds in the room of Circum­cision, and that by an Argument drawn from the compleatness of our Privileges under the New-Testament, no way infe­riour, but rather more extensive than those of the Iews, Col. 2. 10, 11, 12.

Fifthly, We shall find that upon the Conversion of any Master or Parent, the whole Houshold were Bapized. By put­ing all these things, with some others, together, we may arrive to the desired satisfaction about the Will of God in this matter.

But some Men want abilities, and others are too sluggish and lazy to ga­ther together, compare and weigh all these and many more hints and disco­veries of the Mind of God, which would give much light unto this point; but they take an easier and cheaper way to satisfy themselves with what lies up­permost upon the surface of Scripture, and so, as it were by consent, let go, and lose their own, and their Childrens blessed and invaluable Privileges, for want of a little labour and patience to search the Scriptures; a folly which few would be guilty of, if but a small earth­ly inheritance were concerned therein.

The Remedies.

To cure this Spiritual sluggishness, and awaken us to the most serious and diligent search after the Will of God in such controversal and doubtful points, that we may not neglect the smallest hint given us about it, the following Conside­rations will be found of great use and weight.

Consideration I.

The most sedate, impartial, and dili­gent inquiries after the Will of God re­vealed in his Word, is a Duty expresly enjoyned by his Soveraign Command, which immediately and indispensibly binds the Conscience of every Christian to the practice of it.

Remarkable is that Text to this pur­pose, Rom. 12. 2. And be not conformed to this world; but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and per­fect will of God. Here you find this Duty, not only associated with, but made the very end of our Non-conformity to the World, and renovation of our minds, the very things which constitute a Chri­stian.

[Page 68] And to sweeten our pains in this work, that Will of God, for the discovery whereof we search, is presented to us under three illustrious and alluring pro­perties, viz. Good, Acceptable, and Per­fect. Good it must needs be, because the Will and Essence of God, the chief Good, are not two things, but one and the same. And Perfect it must needs be, because it is the Beam and Standard, by which the Actions of all reasonable Creatures ought to be weighed and tryed, as to the mo­ral good or evil of them. And being both good and perfect, How can it chuse but, upon both accounts, be highly Ac­ceptable and grateful to an upright Soul, as that Epithete [...] there imports. Search the Scriptures, saith Christ, Ioh. 5. 39. To the Law and to the Testimony, faith the Prophet, Isa. 8. 20. This is not mat­ter of meer Christian Liberty, but Com­manded Duty; and at our peril [...] be it if we neglect it.

Consideration II.

No act of ours can be good and ac­ceptable to the Lord, further than it is agreeable to his Will revealed in the Word.

[Page 69] No Man can be a Rule to himself. He can be no more his own Rule than his own End. One Man cannot be a Rule to another. The best of Men, and their Actions, and Examples, are only so far a rule of imitation to us, as they them­selves are ruled by the Divine revealed Will, 1 Cor. 11. 1. uncommanded acts of Worship are abominable to God, and highly dangerous to our selves; they kindle the fire of his jealousie to the ruin and destruction of the presumptuous Sin­ner, L [...]vit. 10. 1, 2. So that if the beauty and excellency of the Will of God be not enough to allure us, the dan­ger of acting without the knowledg of it may justly terrify us.

Consideration III.

In this Duty we tread in the Foot­steps of the wisest and holiest Men that ever went to Heaven before us.

It is not only the Characteristical note of a good Man, Psal. 1. 2. but it has been the constant practise of the most eminent believers in all Ages. The greatest Prophets, that had this advantage of us, that they were the Organs or in­spired instruments of discovering the Will of God to others, yet were not excused [Page 70] from, neither did they neglect to search it diligently themselves, 1 Pet. 1. 10, 11. Daniel, that great favourite of Heaven, who had the Visions and Revelations of God; yet he himself diligently searched the written Word, in order to the disco­very of the Mind of God, Dan. 9. 2.

Consideration IV.

Every discovery of the Will of God by fervent Prayer, diligent and impartial search of the Scriptures, and all other al­lowed helps, gives the highest pleasure the mind of Man is capable of in this World.

If Archimedes▪ upon the discovery of a Mathematical Truth, was so transport­ed and ravished, that he cried out, [...], I have found it, I have found it; what pleasure then must the investi­gation and discovery of a Divine Truth give to a sanctified Soul! Thy words were found of me (saith Ieremiah) and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoycing of my heart, Jer. 15. 16. as pleasant food to a Famished Man; for now Conscience is quieted, comforted, and cheered in the way of Duty. A Man walks not at adventure with God, as that word signifies, Levit. 26. 40, 41.

[Page 71] but hath the pleasant directive light of the Word and Will of God, shining sweetly upon the path of his Duty.

Consideration V.

By this means you shall find your Faith greatly confirmed in the truth of the Scriptures.

The sweet consent, and beautiful har­mony of all the parts of the written Word, is a great Argument of its Divi­nity; and this you will clearly discern, when by a due search you shall find things that lye at the remotest distance, to conspire and consent in one, and one part casting light, as well as adding strengh, to another. Thus you shall find Vetus Testamentum in novo revelatum, & novum in vetere velatum. The New Te­stament veiled in the Old, and the Old re­vealed in the New: And that such a con­sent of things, so distant in time and place, can never be the project and in­vention of Man.

Consideration VI.

The diligent and impartial search and inquiry after the Will of God, out of no other design than to please him in the whole course of our Duties, will turn to [Page 72] us for a testimony of the integrity and sincerity of our hearts.

Thy word (said David) have I hid in my heart, that I might not sin against thee: And God will not hide his Will from those that thus seek to know it. If Men would apply themselves to search the Word by fervent Prayer, and fixed Me­ditations, upon so pure a design, not bringing their prejudiced or prepossessed minds unto it; the Spirit of the Lord would guide them into all Truth, and keep them out of dangerous and de­structive Errors.

Fourth Cause.

Besides the slothfulness of the mind, there is found in many Persons another evil Disposition preparing them easily to receive Erroneous Impressions; namely, the INSTABILITY and Fickleness of the Judgment, and Unsetledness of mind about the Truth of the Gospel.

Of this the Apostle warns us, Eph. 4. 14. That we henceforth be no more Chil­dren tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of Doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in weight to deceive. None are so constant and steddy in the profession of [Page 73] the Truth, as those that are fully convin­ced of, and well satisfied with the grounds of it. Every Professor, like every Ship at Sea, should have an [...], a ballast and steddiness of his own, 2 Pet. 3. 17. ready and prepared to render a rea­son of the hope that is in him, 1 Pet. 3. 15. able upon all occasions to give an ac­count of those inward motives which constrained his assent to the Truth.

He that professeth a Truth ignorantly, cannot be rationally supposed to adhere to it constantly. He that is but half con­vinced of a truth, when he engages in the profession of it, must needs be [...], a double-minded Man, as the Apo­stle calls him, Iam. 1. 8. half the mind hangs one way, and half another, and so it is easily moveable this way or that, with the least breath of temptation. And hence it comes to pass they are so often at a loss about their Duty and their Practise; for Animi volutatio pendentem reddit vi­tam. A doubtful Mind must needs make a staggering and uncertain Practice.

Erroneous Teachers are called wan­dring Stars, Jude 13. which keep no certain course as the fixed Stars do, but are sometimes nearer and sometimes re­moter one from another. Thus Er­rorists [Page 74] first imbibe unsetling Opinions, and then discover them in their incon­stant Practises. Ber [...]ius wrote a Book de Apostatià Sanctorum, and soon after turn­ed Papist. The Socinians and Libertines teach, That a Man of any Perswasion in Religion may be saved, so that he walk not contrary to his own Light: such Do­ctrine directly tends to Sceptecism in Re­ligion.

And this Instability of the Judgment proceeds either from Hypocrisie, or weak­ne [...] Sometimes from Hypocris [...]e All Hypocrites are [...], double-minded Men: Iam. 4. 8. The double-minded man (that is the Hypocrite) is unstable in all his ways. One of that number was not asha­med to say, Se duas habere animas in eo­dem corpore, unam Deo dicatam, alteram unicuique illam vellet: That he had two Souls in one Body, one for God, and ano­ther for whosoever would have it.

Sometimes Instability of the mind is the effect only of Weakness in the Judg­ment, proceeding merely from want of age and growth in Christ, not having as yet attained Senses exercised to discern both good and evil, Heb. 5. 14. they are but Children in Christ, and Children are easie and credulous Creatures, Eph. 4. [Page 75] 14. presently taken with a new Toy▪ and as soon weary of it; such a wavering and instable temper invites temptation, and falls an easie prey into its hands.

I confess some Cases may happen, where the Pretences on both sides may be so fair, as to put a judicious Christian to a stand what to chuse; but then their deliberation will be answerable, and then they will not change their Opinions every month, as Scepticks do. Wherever Er­ror finds such a mutable disposition, its work is half done before it make one as­sault. How many wavering Professors at this day lie in Temptation's way? and how great a harvest have Errorists and Hereticks had among them? There's not a Mountebank comes upon the Stage, but he shall find ten times more Customers for his Druggs, than the most Learned and Experienced Physician. The giddy-headed Multitude have more regard to Novelty, than Truth.

The Remedies.

How necessary and desirable are some effectual Rules and Remedies in this Case! O what a mercy would it be to the Pro­fessors of these days, to have their Minds fixed, and their Judgments setled in the Truths of Christ! Happy is that man [Page 76] whose Judgment is so guarded, that no dangerous Error or Heresie can commit a Rape upon it. To this end I shall here commend the four following Rules to prevent this vertigenous malady in the heads of Christians.

Rule I.

Look warily to it that you get a real inward implantation into Christ, and lay the foundation deep and firm in a due and serious deliberation of Religion when­ever you engage in the publick profession of it.

To this sense sound the Apostle's words, Col. 2. 6, 7. As you have therefore received Christ Iesus the Lord, so walk ye in him, rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as you have been taught. Fertility and stability in Christ, a pair of inestimable Blessings, depend upon a good rooting of the Soul in him at first. He that thrusts a dead stick into the ground, may easily pull it up again, but so he cannot do by a well-rooted Tree. A colour raised by violent action, or a great fire, soon dies away; but that which is natural or constitutional will hold. Every thing is as its foundation is. 'Twas want of a good root and due depth of earth which soon turned the [Page 77] green Corn into dry stubble, Matt. 13. 21.

Rule II.

Labour after an inward experimental taste of all those Truths which you pro­fess.

This will preserve your minds from wavering and hesitation about the cer­tainty and reality of them. We will not easily part with those Truths, which have sensibly shed down their sweet influences upon our hearts, Heb. 10. 34. No So­phister can easily perswade a man that hath ta [...]ted the sweetness of Honey, that it is a bitter and unpleasant thing: Non est disputandum de gustu: you cannot ea­sily perswade a man out of his Senses.

Rule III.

Study hard and pray earnestly for sa­tisfaction in the present Truths; 2 Pet. 1. 12. That you may be established [...], in the truth that now is un­der opposition and controversie. Be not ig­norant of the Truths that lie in present hazard.

Antiquated Opinions that are more abstracted from our present Interest, are no tryals of the soundness of our Judg­ments, and integrity of our Hearts, as the controversies and conflicts of the pre­sent [Page 78] Times are. Every Truth hath its time to come upon the stage, and enter the lists; some in one Age, and some in another; but Providence seems to have cast the lot of your Nativity for the ho­nour and defence of those Truths, with which Error is struggling and conflicting in your time.

Rule IV.

Lastly, Be throughly sensible of the benefit and good of establishment, and of the evil and danger of a wavering Mind and Judgment.

Be not carried about with divers and strange Doctrines (saith the Apostle) for it is a good thing that the heart be esta­blished, &c. Heb. 13. 9. Established Souls are the honour of Truth. It was the honour of Religion in the primitive days, that when the Heathens would proverbially express an Impossibility, they used to say, You may as soon turn a Christian from Christ, as do it.

The Fickleness of Professors is a stum­bling-block to the World. They'l say as Cato of the Civil Wars betwixt Caesar and Pompey, quem fugiam, video, quem se­quar, non video: they know whom to a­void, but not whom to follow. And as [Page 79] the honour of Truth, so the flourishing of your own Souls depends on it. A Tree often removed from one Soil to ano­ther, can never be expected to be fruit­ful, 'tis well if it make a shift to live.

Fifth Cause.

Another inward Cause disposing men to receive Erroneous Impressions, is an unreasonable EAGERNESS to snatch at any Doctrine or Opinion that promi­sesh ease to an anxious Conscience.

Men that are under the frights and terrours of Conscience, are willing to li­sten to any thing that offers present relief. Of all the Troubles in the World, those of the Mind and Conscience are most in­tolerable. And those that are in pain are glad of ease, and readily catch at any thing that seems to offer it.

This seems to be the thing which led those poor distressed Wretches, intima­ted Micah 6. 6. into their gross Mistakes and Errors about the method of the re­mission of their Sins. Wherewith shall I come before the Lord, and [...]ow my self be­fore the high God? shall I come before him with Burnt-offerings, with Calves of a year old? Will the Lord be pleased with thousand of Rams▪ or with ten thousand of Rivers [Page 80] of Oyl? Shall I give my First-born for my Transgression, the Fruit of my Body for the Sin of my Soul? They were ready to purchase inward peace, and buy out their pardon at any rate. Nothing but the twinges of Conscience could have ex­torted these things from them. Great is the efficacy and torment of a guilty Con­science.

Satan, who feels more of this in him­self than any other Creature in the World, and knows how ready poor ig­norant, but distressed Sinners, are to catch at any thing that looks like ease or com­fort, and being jealous what these trou­bles of Conscience may issue into, pre­pares for them such Erroneous Doctrines and Opinions under the names of Ano­dines and quieting Recipe's, by swallow­ing of which they feel some present ease; but their Disease is thereby made so much the more incurable.

Mr. Gataker, in his Book against Saltmarsh, p. 27. tells us of one that had ta­ken ill Courses, and being under much trouble of mind, could not be quiet till he turned Papist, and had been shrieved and assailed by a Priest. 'Tis upon this account he hath found such vent in the World for his Penanees, Pilgrimages and Indulgen­ces among the Papists. But seeing this Ware will not go off among the Reformed and more enlightned Pro­fessors [Page 81] of Christianity, he changeth his hand, and fitteth other Doses under other names to quiet sick and distressed Souls, before ever their frights of Conscience come to settle into true Repentance and Faith in the Blood of Christ, by dressing up, and presenting to them such Opini­ons as these, viz.

That they may boldly apply to them­selves all the Promises of pardon and peace, without any respect at all to Re­pentance or Faith in themselves; that it is not at all needful, nay, that it is illegal and sinful to have any respect to these things, forasmuch as their Sins were par­doned, and they justified from Eternity; and that the Covenant of Grace is in all respects absolute, and is made to Sinners as Sinners, without any regard to their Faith or Repentance; and whatever Sins there be in them, God sees them not.Salt­marsh, in the Title-page of his Book called Free-grace, shews you the Sovereign ver­tue of Antinomian Principles, to quiet Troubles of Conscience of 12 years growth.

To such a Charm of Troubles as this, how earnestly doth the Ear of a distres­sed Conscience listen? how greedily doth it suck in such pleasing words? Are all [Page 82] Sins that are pardoned, pardoned before they are committed? and does the Cove­nant of Grace require neither Repen­tance nor Faith antecedently to the appli­cation of the Promises? how groundless then are all my Fears and Troubles? This, like a Dose of Opium, quiets, or ra­ther stupifies the raging Conscience: for even an Error in Judgment, till it be dete­cted and discovered to be so, quiets and comforts the heart, as well as principles of Truth; but whenever the fallacy shall be detected, whether here or hereafter, the anguish of Conscience must be in­creased, or (which is worse) left despe­rate.

The Remedies.

To prevent and cure this mistake and error in the Soul, by which it is fitted and prepared to catch any Erroneous Principle (which is but plausible) for its present relief and ease, I shall desire my Reader seriously to ponder and con­sider the following Queries upon this Case.

Query I.

Whether by the vote of the whole Ra­tional World, a good Trouble be not bet­ter [Page 83] than a false Peace? Present ease is de­sirable, but eternal safety is much more so: and if these two cannot consist under the present Circumstances of the Soul, Whether it be not better to endure for a time these painful pangs, than feel more acute and eternal ones, by quieting Con­science with false Remedies before the time?

'Tis bad to lie tossing a few days un­der a laborious Fever; but far worse to have that Fever turned into a Lethargy or fatal Apoplexy. Erroneous Principles may rid the Soul of its present pain, and eternal hopes and safety together. Acute pains are better than a senseless stupidity. Though the present rage of Conscience be not a right and kindly conviction, yet it may lead to it, and terminate in faith and union with Christ at last, if Satan do not this way practice upon it, and quench it before its time.

Query II.

Bethink your selves seriously, Whe­ther Troubles so quieted and laid asleep, will not revive and turn again upon thee with a double force, as soon as the vertue of the Drug (I mean the Erroneous Principle) hath spent it self?

[Page 84] The efficacy of Truth is eternal, and will maintain the peace it gives, for ever; but all delusions must vanish, and the Troubles which they damm'd up for a time, break out with a greater force. Satan employs two sorts of Witches. Some to torment the Bodies of Men with grievous pain and anguish: but then he hath his White-Witches at hand to relieve and ease them. And have these poor Wretches any great cause (think you) to boast of the cure, who are eased of their pains at the price of their Souls?

Much like unto this, are the cures of inward Troubles by Erroneous Princi­ples. I lament the Case of blinded Pa­pists, who by Pilgrimages, and Offerings to the Shrines of Titular Saints, attempt the cure of a lesser Sin by committing a greater. Is it because there is not a God in Israel, who is able in due season to pa­cify Conscience with proper and durable Gospel-Remedies, that we suffer our Troubles thus to precipitate us into the Snares of Satan for the sake of present ease?

Query III.

Read the Scriptures, and inquire whe­ther God's People, who have lain long [Page 85] under sharp inward Terrors, have not at last found settlement and inward peace by those very Methods, which the Principles that quiet you, do utterly exclude?

If you will fetch your Peace from a groundless Notion, that your Sins were pardoned, and your Persons justified from all eternity, and therefore you may ap­ply boldly and confidently to your selves the choicest Promises and Privileges in the Gospel, without any regard to Faith or Repentance wrought by the Spirit in your Souls: I am sure holy David took another Course for the settlement of his Conscience, Psal. 51. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. And it hath been the constant practise of the Saints in all Ages, to clear their Title to the Righteousness of Christ wrought without them, by the Works of his Spirit wrought within them.

Sixth Cause.

The next Evil Temper in the Subject, preparing and disposing it for Error, is an easie CREDVLITY, or sequacious humour in men, rendring them apt to receive things upon trust from others, without due and thorough examination of the grounds and Reasons of them, themselves.

[Page 86] This is a disposition fitted to receive any impression Seducers please to make upon them: they are said to deceive the hearts of the simple, [...], i. e. credu­lous, but well-meaning People that su­spect no harm. 'Tis said, Prov. 14. 15. the simple believeth every word. Through this Sluce or Floodgate, what a multi­tude of Errors in Popery have overflowed the People! They are told, they are not able to judge for themselves, but must take the matters of their Salvation upon trust from their Spiritual Guides; and so the silly People are easily seduced, and made easily receptive of the grossest Ab­surdities their ignorant Leaders please to impose upon them.

And it were to be wished, That those two Points, viz. Ministrorum mut a officia, & populi caeca o [...]sequia, the dumb Services of their Ministers, and the blind Obedi­ence of the People had stay'd within the Popish Confines. But alas, alas! how many simple Protestants be there, who may be said to carry their Brains in other mens Heads? and like silly Sheep follow the next in the tract before them; espe­cially if their Leaders have but wit and art enough to hide their Errors under specious and plausible Pretences. How [Page 87] many poisonous Drugs hath Satan put off under the gilded Titles of Antiquity, Zeal for God, higher attainments in god­liness, new Lights? &c. How natural is it for men to follow in the Tract, and be tenacious of the Principles and Practises of their Progenitors? Multitudes seem to hold their Opinions Iure Haereditario, by an Hereditary Right, as if their Faith descended to them the same way their Estates do.

The Emperour of Morocco told King Iohn's Ambassadour, That he had lately read St. Paul's Epistles; And truly (said he) were I now to chuse my Religion, I would embrace Christianity before any Re­ligion in the World: but every man ought to dye in that Religion he received from his Ancestors.

Many honest, well-meaning, but weak Christians, are also easily beguiled by specious pretences of new Light, and higher attainments in Reformation. This makes the weaker sorts of Christians pli­able to many dangerous Errors cunningly insinuated under such taking Titles. What are most of the Erroneous Opini­ons now vogued in the World, but old Errors under new Names and Titles?

The Remedies.

The Remedies and Preventions in this Case are such as follow.

Remedy I.

'Tis beneath a man to profess any Opi­nion to be his own, whilst the grounds and reasons of it are in other mens keeping, and wholly unknown to himself.

If a man may tell Gold after his Father, then sure he may and ought to try and examine Doctrines and Points of Faith after him. We are commanded to be ready to give an account of the hope that is in us, and not to say, this or that is my Judgment or Opinion, but let others give an account of the ground and reason of it.

I confess, if he that leads me into an Error were alone exposed to the hazard, and I quit and free, whatever become of him; it were quite another thing. But when our Saviour tells us, Matth. 15. 14. that both (that is, the Follower as well as the Leader) fall into the ditch; at my peril be it if I follow without eyes of my own. That's but a weak building that is shored up by a prop from a Neighbour's Wall. How many men have ruined their Estates by Suretiship for others? but of all Suretiship none so dangerous [Page 89] as spiritual Suretiship. We neither ought (as a late Worthy speaks) to defy the Iudgment of the weakest, nor yet on the other side to deify the Iudgment of the strongest Christian. He that pins his Faith upon another man's Sleeve, knows not whither he will cary it.

Remedy II.

As you ought not to abuse your Chri­stian Privilege and Liberty to try all things, 1 Thess. 5. 21. so neither on the other side to undervalue, or part with it. See the things that so much concern your eternal peace with your own eyes.

I shewed you before, this Liberty is abused by extending it too far; and un­der the notion of proving all things, many embolden themselves to innovate and en­tertain any thing: yet beware of barte­ring such a precious Privilege for the fairest Promises others can make in lieu of it. I would not slight nor undervalue the Piety and Learning of others, nor yet put out my own eyes to see by theirs.

Remedy III.

Before you adventure to espouse the Opinions of others, diligently observe and mark the fruits and consequences of [Page 90] those Opinions in the Lives of the zealous Abettors and Propagators of them: By their fruits (saith Christ) ye shall know them.

When the Opinion or Doctrine natu­rally tends to looseness, or when it sucks and draws away all a man's zeal to main­tain and diffuse it, and practical Religion thereby visibly languishes in their Con­versations, 'tis time for you to make a pause, before you advance one step far­ther towards it.

Seventh Cause.

The next Evil Disposition that I shall note in the Subject, is a vain CVRIO­SITY of mind, or an itching desire to pry into things unrevealed, at least above our ability to search out and discover.

'Tis an Observation as true as ancient, Pruritus aurium scabies Ecclesiae, itching Ears come to a Scab upon the face of the Church. The itch of Novelty produceth the Scab of Error. Of this Disease the Apostle warns us, 2 Tim. 4. 3. For the time will come, when they will not endure sound Doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves Teachers, ha­ving itching ears. Nothing will please them but new Notions, and new modes [Page 91] of Language and Method, Tone and Gesture.

Sound Doctrine is the only substan­tial and solid food that nourishes and strengthens the heart of the new Crea­ture: but vain Scepticks nauseate and de­spise this as trite, vulgar, cheap and low. Nothing humours them but Novelties and Rarities: their unsetled Brains must be wheel'd about, [...], with divers and strange Doctrines, Heb. 13. 9. Novelty and Variety are the only properties that commend Doctrines to wanton Palates. Hence it is they so boldly intrude into things they have not seen, Col. 2. 18. These Cyril fitly calls [...], the domineer­ings, or darings of bold Spirits.

The Schoolmen have filled the World with a thousand ungrounded Fancies, as the distinct Offices and Orders of Angels; and higher flights of fancy than these, which seem to be invented for no other end or use, but to please the itching Ears of the Curious.

There is not only a vesana temerit as Genethliacorum, a wild and daring rash­ness of Astrologers, presuming to foretel Futurities, and the Fates of Kingdoms, as well as particular Persons, from the [Page 92] conjunctions and influences of the Stars; but there is also found as high a pre­sumption and boldness among men in matters of Religion.

Satan is well aware of this humour in men, and how exceeding serviceable it is to his Design; and therefore having the very knack of clawing and pleasing itch­ing Ears with taking-Novelties, he is never wanting to feed their minds with a pleasing variety, and fresh succession of them: new Opinions are still invented and minted, in which the dangerous Hooks of Error are hid. If men were once cured of this spiritual itch, and their minds reduced to that temper and sobriety, as to be pleased with, and bless God for the plain revealed Truths of the Gospel; Satan would drive but a poor Trade, and find but few Customers for his Erroneous Novelties.

The Remedies.

The proper Remedies to cure this itch after Novelty, or dangerous Curiosity of the mind, are

Remedy I.

Due Reflection upon the manifold mis­chiefs that have entered into the World this way.

[Page 93] It was this Curiosity and desire to know, that overthrew our first Parents, Gen. 3. 6. When the Woman saw that the Tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a Tree to be de­sired to make one wise; she took of the fruit thereof. The very same way by which he let in the first Error, he hath let thou­sands into the World since that day. No­thing is more common in the World, than for an old Error to obtain afresh un­der the name of new Light. Satan hath the very art of turkening stale Errors af­ter the mode of the present times, and make them currant and passable, as new Discoveries and rare Novelties.

Thus he puts off Libertinism, the old Sin of the World, under the Title of Christian Liberty. What a Troop of Pa­gan Idolatrous Rites were by this means introduced among the Papists? A great part of Popery is but Ethnicismus redivi­vus, Heathenism revived. The Pagans Pontifex Maximus was revived under the new Title of Pope. The Gentiles Lu­strations, in the Popish Holy-water. Their Novendiale sacrum, or Sacrifice nine days after the burial of the Party, in the Po­pish Masses for the dead. Their Alvarium Fratrum, in Cloisters of Monks and Fryars▪

[Page 94] Their Enchanters, in Popish Exorcists. Their Asyla, in Popish Sanctuaries. With multitudes more of Pagan Rites quite out of date in Christendom, introduced again under new names in Popery; as was intimated R [...]v. 11. 2. and Rev. 13. 15.

Remedy II.

Be satisfied that God hath not left his People to seek their Salvation,Quod nes­ciatur sine crimine, ne discu­tiatur cum dis­crimine. or spiritual subsistence, among curious, abstruse and doubtful Notions; but in the great, so­lid, and plainly revealed Truths of the Gospel. Iohn 17. 3. This is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Iesus Christ whom thou hast sent. In facili & absoluto stat aeternit as: the great Concerns of our Salvation are plain and easie to be understood.

Remedy III.

Vain Curiosity is a dangerous Snare of Satan. By such trifles as these, he devours our time, eats up our strength, and di­verts our minds from the necessary and most important business of Religion. Whilst we immerse our thoughts in these pleasing, but barren Contemplations, Heart-work, Closet-work, Family-work, lie by neglected. Whilst we are employ­ed [Page 95] in garnishing the Dish with Flowers, and curious Figures, the cunning Cheat takes away the meat our Souls should subsist by.

Eighth Cause.

Pride and Arrogancy of HVMANE REASON, is another Evil Disposition, molding and preparing the mind for Er­rors. When men are once conceited of the strength and perspicacity of their own carnal Reasons and Apprehensions, no­thing is more usual than for such men to run mad with Reason into a thousand Mistakes and Errors. To this cause Ec­clesiastical Historians ascribe the Errors that infest the Church.Deindé, & huma­nae rationis sapientia quae religioni plurimùm semper nocuit, seu Philosophia, non paucas ex sese produxit haereses. Námque eo tempore Philosophica studia maximè vigebant; & suis argutiis, seu (ut ipsi putabant) demonstrationibus, in suâ sententiâ ità confir­mati erant: ut nihil verum existimarent, quod ab eorum conceptis jamdudum opinionibus discreparet. Magdeb. in Cent. 2. cap. 5. pag. 56.

Reason indeed is the highest natural excellency of man: it exalts him above all Earthly Creatures, and in its primi­tive perfection almost equalized him with Angels, Heb. 2. 7. The Pleasures which result from its exercises and expe­riments, [Page 96] transcend all the delights and pleasures of sense. How common is it for men to dote upon their own intelle­ctual beauty, and glory in their victories over weaker Understandings? And tho the reason of fallen Man is greatly wounded and weakened by Sin; yet it conceits it self to be as strong and clear as ever; and with Sampson, when his Locks were shorn, goes forth as before time, being neither sensible of its own weakness, or of the mysterious and un­searchable depths of Scripture.

Reason is our Arbiter and Guide by the institution and Law of Nature, in civil and natural Affairs: 'tis the beam and standard at which we weigh them. It is an home-born Judge and King in the Soul: Faith comes in as a stranger to Nature, and so it is dealt with, even as an Intruder into Reason's Province, just as the Sodomites dealt with Lot. It refu­seth to be an Underling to Faith. Out of this Arrogancy of carnal Reason, as from Pandor [...]'s Box, swarms of Errors are flown abroad into the World.

By this means Socinianism first started, and hath since propagated it self. They look upon it as a ridiculous and unac­countable thing to reason, that the Son [Page 97] should be co-equal and co-eternal with the Father: that God should forgive sins freely, and yet forgive none but upon full satisfaction. That Christ should make that satisfaction by his Sufferings, and yet be pars laesa, the Party offended, and so make satisfaction to himself: with many more of the like stamp.

Yea, Atheism, as well as Socinianism, are births from this Womb. 'Tis proud and carnal Reason which quarrels at the Creation of the World, and seems to triumph in its uncontrolable M [...]xim, Ex nihilo nihil fit, out of nothing comes nothing. It looks upon the Doctrine of the Resur­rection with a deriding smile, as a thing incredible. It thinks it hard and harsh that God should command men to turn themselves to him, and threaten them with damnation in case of refusal; and yet at the same time man should not have in himself a sufficient power, and a free will to do this, without the super­natural and preventing Grace of God. It thinks it a ridiculous thing for such a great and solemn Ordinance of God as Baptism is, to pass upon such a Subject as an Infant of a week old, which is not capable to understand the Ends and Uses of it. Hence it is some over-heated Zea­lots [Page 98] lots have not stuck to say,Mr. Samuel Clark's Golden Apples. p. 149. That we have as good warrant and reason to baptize Cats, Dogs and Horses, as we have to babtize Infants. Oh the madness of Car­nal Reason!

The Remedies.

To take down the Arrogance, and pre­vent the mischief of Carnal Reasonings, let us be convinced,

Remedy I.

That it is the will of God, that Rea­son in all Believers should resign to Faith, and all Ratiocination submit to Reve­lation.

Reason is no better than an Usurper, when it presumes to arbitrate matters be­longing to Faith and Reve­lation. Man having sinned by pride, the wisdom of God humbles him at the very root of the Tree of Knowledge, and makes him deny his own Understanding, and submit to Faith; or else for ever to lose his desired Felicity. Laud against Fisher, p. 5. Reason's proper place is to sit at the feet of Faith, and instead of search­ing the secret grounds and reasons, to adore and ad­mire the great and un­searchable Mysteries of the Gospel. None of God's works are un­reasonable, but many of them are above Reason. It was as truly, as ingenuously said by one; Never doth Reason shew it [Page 99] self more reasonable, than when it ceaseth to reason about things that are above Rea­son. Where is the Wise? where is the Scribe? where is the Disputer of this World? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this World? For after that, in the wisdom of God, the World by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolish­ness of preaching to save them that believe, 1 Cor. 1. 20, 21. 'Tis not Reason, but Faith that must save us.

The Wisdom of God in the Gospel, is wisdom in a Mystery, even hidden wis­dom, which God ordained before the World unto our glory, 1 Cor. 2. 7. Such wisdom as the most Eagle-eyed Rationa­lists and famed Philosophers of the World understood not. Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entred into the heart of man the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them to us by his spirit, ibid. vers. 9, 10.

Remedy II.

Be convinced of the weakness and deep corruption of natural Reason, and this will restrain its Arrogance, and make it modest and wary.

[Page 100] A convinced and renewed Soul is con­scious to it self of its own weakness and blindness, and therefore dares not pry au­daciously into the Arcana Coeli, nor sum­mon the great God to its bar. It finds it self posed by the Mysteries of Nature, and therefore concludes it self an incompetent Judge of the Mysteries of Faith.

The Arrogancy of Reason is the reign­ing Sin of the Unregenerate, though it be a Disease with which the Regenerate themselves are infected. When Convi­ction shall do its work upon the Soul, the Plumes of spiritual pride quickly fall; and it saith with Iob: Once have I spoken, but I will speak no more; yea, twice, but I will proceed no further. q. d. I have done, Father, I have done; I have uttered things that I understood not, Job 42. 3. Spiritual Illumination cures this Ambition.

Remedy III.

Consider the manifold Mischiefs and Evils flowing from the pride of Reason.

It doth not only fill the World with Errors and Distractions; but it also in­vades the Rights of Heaven, and casts a vile reflection upon the Wisdom, Sove­reignty and Veracity of God. It lifts up [Page 101] it self against his Wisdom, not consider­ing that the foolishness of God is wiser than men, 1 Cor. 1. 25. It spurns at his glorious Sovereignty, not considering that he giveth no account of his matters, Job 33. 13. It questions his Veracity, in saying with Nicodemus, How can these things be? Joh. 3. 9.

Cause IX.

The last Evil Disposition I shall here take notice of in the Subject, is rash and ignorant ZEAL; a temper preparing the mind both to propagate furiously, and receive easily Erroneous Doctrines and Opinions.

When there is in the Soul more heat than light; when a fervent Spirit is go­verned by a weak Head, such a temper of Spirit Satan desires, and singles out as fittest for his purpose, especially when the Heart is graceless, as well as the Un­derstanding weak. A blind Horse of an high mettle will carry the Rider into any Pit, and venture over the most dangerous Precipices.

Such were the Superstitious Iewish Zealots: they had a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. This [...] blind zeal, St. Paul charges justly upon [Page 102] the Iewish Bigots, Rom. 10. 2. as the proper cause of their dangerous Errors about the great point of Iustification: and surely no man understood the evil of it more than he, who in his unregene­rate state was transported by it to the most furious persecution of the Saints, Acts 26. 11. and even to dotage, and ex­treme fondness upon the Erroneous Tra­ditions of his Fathers, Gal. 1. 14.

Blind Zeal is a Sword in a Mad-man's hand. No Persecutor to a Conscientious one, whose Erroneous Conscience offers up the blood of the Saints to the glory of God, Iob. 16. 2. The blind, but zea­lous Pharisees would compass Sea and Land to make one Proselyte, Matth. 23. 15. as our Modern Pharisees, the Iesuits, have since done, who have mingled themselves with the remotest and most barbarous Nations, to draw them to the Romish Error. Of the same temper were the false Teachers taxed by the Apostle, Gal. 4. 17. they zealously affect you, but not well: yea, they would exclude you (viz. from our Society and Ordinances) that you might affect them.

And as it is the great Instrument by which Satan propagates Errors, so it makes a fit temper in the Souls of the [Page 103] People to receive them. For by this means Error gains the possession of the Affections, without passing a previous and due test by the Understanding, and so gains the Soul by the advantage of a Surprize. Every thing, by how much the more weak and ignoble it is, by so much the more it watcheth upon Surpri­sals and Advantages. Error cares not to endure the due examination and test of Reason; and therefore seeks to gain by surprisal, what it despairs of ever gaining by a plain and fair tryal.

There be few Errorists in the World of Alexander's mind, who would rather lose the day, than steal the Victory. Hence it comes to pass, that the greatest number of those they lead Captives, are silly Wo­men, as the Apostle speaks, who are the most affectionate, but least judicious Sex.

From this blind Zeal it is, that they cunningly wind their Erroneous Opi­nions into all their Discourses, where they have any hope to prevail. A ratio­nal and modest Contradiction puts them into a flame, it breaks the nearest bonds of Friendship and Society.

Rabshekah in 2 King. 18. would not treat with Hezekiah's Counsellors of State, [Page 104] but with the common People upon the Wall: and Error cares not to treat with sound Reason, able to sift it through the Scripture-search, but with the Affe­ctions; as well knowing, it is in vain to make war in Reason's Territories, with­out first gaining a party among the Af­fections.

The Remedies.

The best Defensatives against Erro­neous Contagions in this case, are to be found in the following Particulars.

Defensative I.

Reflect seriously and sadly upon the manifold Mischiefs occasioned every­where, and in all Ages of the World, by rash Zeal.

Revolve Church-histories, and you shall find, that scarce any cruel Per­secution hath flamed in the World, which hath not been kindled by blind Zeal. Turn over all the Records, both of Pagan and Popish Persecutions, and you shall still find these two Observa­tions confirmed and verified.

First, That ignorant Zeal hath kind­led the fires of Persecution; and secondly, That the more zealous any have been for [Page 510] the ways of Error and Falshood, still the more implacably fierce and cruel they have been to the sincere Servants of God. None like a Superstitious Devoto to ma­nage the Devil's work of Persecution throughly, and to purpose. They'l rush violently and head-long into the blood of their dearest Relations, or most eminent Saints, to whose sides the Devil sets this sharp Spur. Superstitious Zeal draws all the strength and power of the Soul into that one Design; and wo to him that stands in the way of such a man, if God interpose not betwixt him and the stroke. It was a rational wish of him that said, Liberet me Deus ab homine unius tantùm negotii, God deliver me from a man of one only Design.

Now consider, Reader, if thy judg­ment be weak, and thy affections warm, how much thou liest exposed, not only to Errors which may ruine thy self, but also to Tongue and Hand-persecution, wherein Satan may manage thy zeal for the injury or ruine of those that are better than thy self: And withal consider, how many dreadful threatnings are found in Scripture against the instru­ments of Persecution, so employed and managed by Satan.

[Page 106] Certainly, Reader, it were better for thee to stand with thy naked breast be­fore the mouth of a discharging Cannon, than that thy Soul should stand under this guilt, before such a Scripture-threat­ning as that, Psal. 7. 13. He hath also prepared for him the instruments of death; he ordaineth his Arrows against the perse­cutors. And none more likely to be­come such, than those of thine own tem­per and complexion; especially if grace be wanting in the heart, whilst Zeal for erroneous Principles eats up the Affe­ctions.

Second Defensative.

Consider what mischief zeal for an Error will do thine own Soul, as well as others.

It will wholly ingross thy time, thoughts and strength; so that if there be any gracious principle in thee, it shall not be able to thrive and prosper: For look, as a Fever takes off the natural ap­petite from Food, so will erroneous Zeal take off thy Spiritual Appetite from Me­ditation, Prayer, Heart-examination, and all other the most necessary and nourish­ing Duties of Religion, by reason where­of thy grace must languish.

[Page 107] When thy Soul, with David's, should be filled and feasted, as with marrow and fatness, by delightful meditations of God upon thy Bed, thou wilt be rolling in thy mind thy barren and insipid notions, which yield no food or spiritual strength to thy Soul; thou wilt lye musing how to dissolve the Arguments and Objections against thine Errors, when thou shouldst rather be employed in solving the just and weighty Objections that lye against thy sincerity and interest in Christ, which were time far better improved.

Third Defensative.

Consider how baneful this inordinate zeal hath been to Christian Society, la­mentably defacing, and almost dissolving it every where, to the unspeakable de­triment of the Churches.

We read, Mal. 3. 16. of a blessed time, when they that feared the Lord spake often one to another, and the Lord hearkened and heard it, and a Book of remembrance was written before him, for them that feared the Lord, and thought upon his Name. Oh happy time! Halcion days! I, my self, remem­ber the time, when the Zeal of the Saints spent it self in provoking one another to [Page 108] Love and Good Works, in joint and fervent Prayer, in inward, experimental, and edifying Communion; my Soul hath them still in remembrance, and is cast down within me: For alas! alas! how do I see every where Christian Commu­nion turned into vain janglings? Church­es and Families into meer Cock-pits? Mens Discoursings falling as naturally in­to contentions about trifles, as they were wont to do into Heavenly and Experi­mental Subjects, to the unspeakable dis­grace and damage of Religion?

Fourth Defensative.

That Opinion is justly to be suspected for erroneous, which comes in at the Po­stern-door of the Affections; and not openly and fairly ar the right Gate of an enlightned and well-satisfied judgment. 'Tis a Thief that cometh in at the back­door, at least strongly to be suspected for one. Truth Courts the Mistriss, makes its first and fair Addresses to the Under­standing. Error bribes the Handmaid, and labours first to win the Affections, that by their influence it may corrupt the Judgment.

And thus you see, besides the inno­cent Occasion, viz. God's Permission of [Page 109] Errors in the World, for the tryal of his people, Nine proper Causes of Errors found in the evil dispositions of the minds of Men, which prepare them to receive erroneous Doctrines and Impressions, viz.

  • 1. A wrangling humour at the pre­tended Obscurity of Scripture.
  • 2. The Abuse of that Christian Liber­ty purchased by Christ.
  • 3. Slothfulness in searching the whole Word of God.
  • 4. Fickleness and Instability of Judg­ment.
  • 5. Eagerness after Anodines to ease a distressed Conscience.
  • 6. An easy Credulity in following the Judgments and Examples of others.
  • 7. Vain Curiosity, and prying into unrevealed Secrets.
  • 8. The Pride and Arrogancy of Hu­man Reason.
  • 9. Blind Zeal, which spurs on the Soul, and runs it upon danger­ous precipices.

We next come to consider the prin­cipal Impulsive Cause, by which Errors are propagated and disseminated in the World.

Cause X.

Come we next in the proper order, to consider the Principal Impulsive Cause of Errors; which is SATAN working upon the predisposed matter he finds in the corrupt Nature of Man.Quae qui­dem res abundè docet di­ram esse Diaboli malitiam: qui victus, at (que) pro­stratus à Christo, nihilominus ausus est ejus verbum ac totam re­ligionis formam, tetris opinionibus ac blasphemiis conspurcare, lacerare, & propemodum evertere. Ut autem portenta hujus ma­ligni spiritùs in conspectu sint & quasi primae scaturigines pluri­marum haeresium, quae postea, veluti aliis in se receptis rivis mi­rum in modum excreverunt, &c. Hist. Magdeb. Cent. 1. Lib. 2. Cap. 5. p. 368. The Centurists speaking of the strange and sudden growth of Errors and Heresies, immediately after the planting of the Gospel by Christ, and the Apostles, a­scribe it to Satan.

Satan is a Lyar from the beginning,When Swinkfeld sent his Books to Luther, he told the Messenger, the Devil was the Au­thor of them; and the Lord rebuke thee Satan, was the Answer he returned to them. and abode not in the Truth: He hates it with a deadly hatred, and all the Chil­dren and Friends of Truth. And this hatred he manifesteth sometimes by rai­sing furious storms of persecution against the sincere Professors of it, Rev. 3. 10. and sometimes by Clouds of Heresies and Errors, with design to darken it. In the former he acts as a roaring Lyon; in the latter as a subtil Serpent, 2 Cor. 11. [...]. I [Page 111] fear lest as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty; so your minds should be cor­rupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

He is exceeding skilful and dexterous in citing and wresting the Scriptures to serve his vile designs and purposes; and as impudently daring, as he is crafty and cunning; as appears in the History of Christ's temptation in the desart, Matt. 4. 6. where he cites one part of that pro­mise, Psal. 91. 11. and suppresseth the rest; shows the encouragement, viz. He shall give his Angels charge over thee; but clips off the limitation of it, viz. to keep thee in all thy ways: In viis, non in prae­cipitiis, In our lawful ways, not in rash and dangerous precipices; as Bernard well glosseth.

And 'tis worth observation, that he introduceth multitudes of Errors into the World, under the unsuspected notions of admirable Prophylacticks, and approved Preservatives from all mischiefs and dan­gers from himself. Under this notion, he hath neatly and covertly slided into the World, Holy-water, Crossings, Re­liques of Saints, and almost innumera­ble other superstitious Rites.

Erroneous Teachers are the Ministers of Satan, however they transform them­selves [Page 112] into Ministers of Righteousness, 2 Cor. 11. 15. and the subtil dangerous Errors they broach, are fitly stiled by the Spirit of God, [...], the depths of Satan, Rev. 2. 24. The cor­rupt Teachers, the Gnosticks, &c. called them Depths, i. e. great mysteries, high and marvellous attainments in knowledg; but the Spirit of God fits a very proper Epithete to them, They are Satanical depths, and Mysteries of Iniquity. Now the level and design of Satan herein is double:

First, He aims at the ruin and dam­nation of those that vent and propagate them; upon which account the Apostle calls them [...], 2 Pet. 2. 1. destructive, or (as we render it) dam­nable Heresies. And because God will preserve the Souls of his own from this mortal Contagion, therefore,

Secondly, He endeavours by lesser Er­rors to busy the minds, and check the growth of Grace in the Souls of the Saints, by employing them about things so fo­reign to true godliness, and the power thereof, Heb. 13. 9.

The Remedies.

The Rules for prevention and recovery, are these that follow:

Rule I.

Pray earnestly for a thorow change of the state and temper of thy Soul, by sound Conversion and Regeneration.

Conversion turns us from darkness to light; and from the power of Satan to God, Acts 26. 18. They are his own slaves and vassals that are taken captive by him at his will, 2 Tim. 2. 16. A San­ctified heart is a Soveraign defensative against Erroneous Doctrines; it furnish­es the Soul with spiritual eyes, judicious ears, and a distinguishing taste, by which it may discern both good and evil, truth and error, Heb. 5. 14. yea, it puts the Soul at once under the conduct of the Spirit, and protection of the Promise, Ioh. 16. 13. and though this doth not secure a Man from all lesser mistakes, yet it effectually secures him from great­er ones, which are inconsistent with Christ and Salvation.

Rule II.

Acquaint your selves with the wiles and methods of Satan, and be not igno­rant of his devices, 2 Cor. 2. 11.

When once you understand the wash and paint with which he sets off the ug­ly [Page 114] face of Error, you will not easily be enamoured with it. Pretences of Devo­tion upon one side, and of Purity, Zeal, and Reformation upon the other▪ though they be pleasant sounds to both ears, yet the wary Soul will examine, before it re­ceive and admit Doctrinal Points under these gilded Titles. Those that have made their Observations upon the strata­gems of Satan, will heedfully observe both the tendency of Doctrines, and the Lives of their Teachers; and if they find looseness, pride, wantonness in them, it is not a glorious title, or magnificent name that shall charm them. They know Satan can transform himself into an Angel of Light; and no wonder if his Ministers also be transformed into Ministers of Righteousness, 2 Cor. 11. 14, 15.

Rule III.

Resign your Minds and Judgments in fervent Prayer to the Government of Christ, and Conduct of the Spirit; and in all your addresses to God, pray that he would keep them chast and pure, and not suffer Satan to commit a rape upon them. Plead with God that part of Christ's Prayer, Iohn 17. 17. Sanctify [Page 115] them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

Rule IV.

Live in the conscientious and constant practice of all those Truths and Duties God hath already manifested to you.

This will bring you under that bles­sed Promise of Christ, Iohn 7. 17. If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God. Satan's greatest successes are amongst idle, no­tional, and vain Professors; not humble, serious, and practical Christians.

Caus [...] XI.

Having considered and dispatched the several internal Causes of Error, found in the evil dispositions of the seduced, as also the Impulsive Cause, viz. Satan, who fits suitable baits to all these sinful humours and evil tempers of the heart; we come next to consider the Instrumen­tal Cause employed by Satan in this work, viz. the FALSE TEACHER, whom Satan makes use of as his Seeds­man, to disseminate and scatter erroneous Doctrines and Principles into the minds of Men, Ploughed up and prepared by those evil tempers forementioned, as a fit Soil to receive them.

[Page 116] The choice of Instruments is a princi­pal part of Satan's policy. Every one is not fit to be employed in such a Service as this. All are not fit to be of the Council of War, who yet take their pla­ces of Service in the Field. A Rustick carried out of the Field, on Board a Ship at Sea, though he never learned his Com­pass, nor saw a Ship before, can by ano­ther's direction tug lustily at a Rope; but he had need be an expert Artist, that sits at the Helm, and steers the course. The worst Causes need the smoothest Orators; and bad Ware a cunning Merchant to put it offSubtiles & astutas fuisse Montani fraudes, & quae blandâ specie quibusvis imponere facilè potuerint; indè liquet quòd totam propemodùm Scriptu­ram suscepit; ac de Deo Patre, Filio, & Spiritu sancto, (ut Epipha­nius scribit) eadem docuit quae Ecclesia Christi. Magdeb. Cent. 2. Cap. 5. p. 77. De Haeresibus sub Commodo.

Deep-parted Men are coveted by Satan to manage this design. None like an eloquent Tertullus to confront a Paul, Acts 24. 1. A subtil Eccius to enter the List in defence of the Popish Cause, a­gainst the Learned and Zealous Reform­ers. When the Duke of Buckingham un­dertook to Plead the bad Cause of Richard the third, the Londoners said, They never thought it had been possible for any Man [Page 117] to deliver so much bad Matter, in such good Words, and quaint Phrases.

The first Instrument chosen by Satan to deceive Man, was the Serpent; be­cause that Creature was more subtil than any Beast of the Field. There is not a Man of eminent parts, but Satan courts and sollicites him for this service. St. Austin told an ingenious, but unsanctified Scho­lar, Cupit abs te ornari Diabolus, The Devil covets thy Parts to adorn his Cause. He surveys the World, and where-ever he finds more than ordinary strength of Reason, pregnancy of Wit, depth of Learning, and elegancy of Language, that is the Man he looks for.

These are the Men that can almost in­discernably sprinkle their Errors among many precious Truths, and wrap up their poisonous Drugs in Leaf-gold or Sugar. Maresius notes of Crellius and his Accomplices, That by the power of their Eloquence, and sophistry of their Arguments, they were able artificially to cloath horrible Blasphemies to allure the simple.Tectorio fucatae e­loquentiae, argutiís (que) Sophisticis è Scripturâ perniciosè detortâ, ac fallaci fallenté (que) ratione horrendae blasphemiae artificiosè circum­vestiuntur ad inescandos simpliciores. Praefatio ad Hydr. Socin..

[Page 118] And like the Hyaena, they can coun­terfeit the voices of the Shepherds, to de­ceive and destroy the Sheep. There is (saith a lateMr. W. Gurnal, Christi [...]n Armour, Part 2. p. 33. Worthy) an erudita nequi­tia, a Learned kind of wickedness, a subtil art of deceiving the minds of o­thers. Upon which account the Spirit of God sometimes compares them, 2 Pet. 2. 3.Sunt qui­dam vani­loqui, & mentis se­ductores, non Chri­stiani, sed Christum mercantes & caupo­nantes verbum Evangelii, qui vene­num Erro­ris com­miscentes dulci blandimento sicut oenomeli ut qui biberit illius potus gustabilem sensum, dulcedine captus, inobservanter morti addic [...]tur. Ignatius Epist. ad Trallianos, p. 68 to cunning and cheating Trades­men, who have the very art to set a gloss upon their bad Wares with fine words, [...], they buy and sell the people with their ensna­ring and feigned words. And sometimes he compares them to cunning Gamesters, that have the art and sleight of hand to Cog the Die, to deceive the unskilful, and win their Game, Eph. 4. 14. [...], &c.

And sometimes the Spirit of God compares them to Witches themselves, Gal. 3. 1. [...]; foolish Ga­latians, who hath bewitched you? How many strange feats have been done upon the bodies of Men and Women by Witch­craft? But far more and stranger upon [Page 119] the Souls of Men by the Magick of Error. Iannes and Iambres performed wonderful things in the sight of Pharoah, by which they deceived and hardened him; and unto these, false Teachers are compa­red.

Such a Man was Elymas the Sorcerer, who laboured to seduce the Deputy, Sergius Paulus, though a prudent Man, Acts 13. 7, 8, 9, 10. Oh full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou Child of the Devil! saith Paul unto him. The Art of sedu­duction from the ways of truth and ho­liness, discovers a Man to be both the Child and Scholar of the Devil.

But as the wise and painful Ministers of Christ, who turn many to Righte­ousness, shall have double Glory in Hea­ven; so these subtil and most active A­gents for the Devil, who turn many from the ways of Righteousness, will have a double portion of misery in Hell.

The Remedies.

The proper Remedies in this Case are principally two.

Remedy I.

Pray fervently, and labour diligently in the use of all God's appointed means, [Page 120] to get more solidity of Judgment, and strength of Grace to establish you in the Truth, and secure your Souls against the cunning craftiness of Men that lye in to deceive.

'Tis the ignorance and weakness of the people, which makes the Factors for Error so successful as they are. Con­sult the Scriptures, and you shall find these cunning Merchants drive the quickest and gainfullest trade among the weak and injudicious. So speaks the Apostle, With good words and fair speech­es, they deceive the hearts of the simple; [...], harmless, weak, easie Souls, who have a desire to do well, but want wisdom to discern the subtilties of them that mean ill; who are void both of fraud in themselves, and suspition of others. Oh! what success have the De­ceivers, [...], their fair words and sugared speeches, sweet and taking expressions, among such innocent ones!

And who are they among whom Sa­tan's cunning Gamesters commonly win the Game, and sweep the Stakes, but weak Christians, credulous Souls, whom for that reason the Apostle calls [...], Children. The word properly signifies an [Page 121] an Infant, when 'tis referred to the Age; but unskilful and unlearned, when re­ferred (as it is here) to the Mind. So again, 2 Pet. 2. 14. They (that is, the False Teachers there spoken of) beguile [...], unstable Souls, Souls that are not confirmed and grounded in the Principles of Religion. Whence by the way, take notice of the unspeakable advantage and necessity of being well Catechized in our youth: the more judi­cious, the more secure.

Remedy II.

Labour to acquaint your selves with the sleights and artifices Satan's Factors and Instruments generally make use of, to seduce and draw Men from the Truth. The knowledg of them is a good defen­sative against them. Now there are two common Artifices of Seducers, which it is not safe for Christians to be ignorant of

First, They usually seek to disgrace and blast the reputations of those Truths and Ministers set for their defence, which they design afterwards to overthrow and ruin; and to beget credit and reputation to those Errors which they have a mind to introduce. How many precious truths [Page 122] of God are this day, and with this de­sign defamed as legal and carnal Do­ctrines; and those that defend them, as Men of an Old Testament spirit?

Humiliation for Sin, Contrition of Spi­rit, &c fall under disgrace with many, and indeed all qualifications and pre-re­quisites unto coming to Christ, as things not only needless, but pernicious unto the Souls of Men, although they have not the least dependance upon them: Yea, Faith it self, as a pre-requisite unto Justification, as no better than a Condi­tion pertaining to Adam's Covenant.

And so for the persons of Orthodox Ministers; you see into what contempt the false Teachers would have brought both the Person and Preaching of Paul himself, 2 Cor. 10. 10. His bodily pre­sence (say they) is weak, and his speech contemptible.

Secondly, Their other common Arti­fice is, to insinuate their false Doctrines among many acknowledged and precious Truths, which only serve for a conve­nient vehicle to them; and besides that, to make their Errors as palatable and gustful as they can to the vitiated Appe­tite of corrupt Nature.Mr. W. G. The foremen­tioned Worthy hath judiciously observed [Page 123] how artificially Satan hath blended his baneful Doses, to please the Palate of Carnal Reason, Spiritual Pride, and the desire of Fleshly Liberty.

Carnal Reason is that great Idol, which the more intelligent part of the carnal World worships. And are not the So­cinian Heresies as pleasant to it, as a well­mixt Iulep to a feverish Stomach.

Spiritual Pride is another Diana, which obtains greatly in the World; and no Doctrine like the Pelagian and Semi­pelagian Errors, gratify it. A Doctrine that sets fallen Nature upon its Legs a­gain, and persuades it, it can go alone to Christ; at least, with a little external help of Moral suasion, without any pre­venting or creating work in the Soul. This goes down glib and grateful.

And then for Fleshly Liberty, How do those that are fond of it rejoice in that Doctrine or Opinion, which looses Na­ture from the yoke of restraint? How does the poor deluded Papist hug him­self, to think he hath liberty by his Re­ligion, to let loose the reins of his Lust to all sensualities, and quit himself from all that guilt, by Auricular Confession to the Priest once a year? How doth the Familist smile upon that Principle of his, [Page 124] which tells him, the Gospel allows more Liberty than severe Legal Teachers think fit to tell them of: They press Repen­tance and Faith; but Christ hath done all this to thy hands.

Cause XII.

Having considered the several Causes of Errors, found in the evil dispositions of the seduced, as also the impulsive and in­strumental Causes, namely Satan and false Teachers employed by him; I shall next proceed to discover some special, and most successful Methods frequently used by them, to draw the minds of Men from the Truth. Amongst which, that which comes first to consideration, is the great skill they have in representing the ABVSES of the Ordinances of God, and Duties of Religion, by wicked Men, to scare tender and weak Con­sciences from the due use of them, and all further attendance upon them.

The abuse of Christ's holy Appoint­ments are so cunningly improved to serve this design, that the minds of many well­meaning persons receive such deep dis­gust at them, that they are scarce ever to be reconciled to them again. A strong prejudice is apt to drive Men from one [Page 125] extream upon another, as thinking they can never get far enough off from that which hath been so scaringly represented to them. Thus making good the old Observation, Dum vitant stulti vitia, in contraria currunt; they run from the troublesome smoak of Superstition, into the Fire of an irreligious contempt of God's Ordinances, split themselves upon Charybdis to avoid Scylla. Ex. gra.

The Papists having deeply abused the Ordinance of Baptism, by their cor­ruptive mixtures and additions of the su­perstitious Cross, Chrism, &c. part whereof is not sufficiently purged to this day by the Reformation; and finding al­so multitudes of carnal Protestants dan­gerously resting upon their supposed bap­tismal Regeneration, to the great hazard of their Salvation; which mistake is but too much countenanced by some of its Administrators: They take from hence such deep offence at the administration of it to any Infants at all (though the Seed of God's Covenanted People) that they think they can never be sharp e­nough in their invectives against it; nor have they patience to hear the most ra­tional defences of that Practise.

[Page 126] So, for that Scriptural Heavenly Du­ty of Singing: What more commonly alledged against it, than the abuse and ill effects of that precious Ordinance? How often is the Nonsense and Error of the common Translation, the rudeness and dulness of the Metre of some Psalms, as Psal. 7. 13. as also the cold formality, with which that Ordinance is performed by many who do but Parrotize? I say, How often are these things buz'd into the ears of the people, to alienate their hearts from so sweet and beneficial a Duty?

And very often we find it urged to the same end, how unwarrantable and dan­gerous a thing it is for carnal and unre­generated persons to appropriate to them­selves in Singing, those Praises and Expe­riences which are peculiar to the Saints; not understanding, or considering that the singing of Psalms is an Ordinance of Christ, appointed for teaching and ad­monition, as well as praising, Col. 3. 16. Teaching and admonishing one another in Psalms and Hymns, &c.The Di­vinity of former ages (saith Mr. Saltmarsh) put but a Grain, or Drachm of Gospel, to a Pound of Law, in their Receipts for distempered Souls. Vide Saltmarsh of Free-grace, p. 40. Thus Antino­mianism took, if not its rise, yet its en­couragement from the too rigorous pres­sing of the Law upon convinced sinners.

[Page 127] If Satan can prevail first with wicked Men, to corrupt and abuse God's Ordi­nances by the superstitious mixtures and additions; and then with good Men, to renounce and slight them for the sake of those abuses; he fully obtains his design, and gives Christ a double wound at once; one by the hand of his avowed Enemies, the other by the hands of his Friends, no less grievous than the first. First, wick­ed Men corrupt Christ's Ordinances; and then good Men nauseate them.

The Remedies.

The proper Remedies against Errors, insinuated by the abuses of Duties and Ordinances, are such as follow:

Remedy I.

Let Men consider, that there is nothing in Religion so great, so sacred and excel­lent, but some or other have greatly cor­rupted or vilely abused them.

What is there in the whole World more precious and excellent than the Free-grace of God? and yet you read, Iude 4. of some that turned the Grace of our Lord into Lasciviousness. What more desirable to Christians, than the glorious Liberty Christ hath purchased [Page 128] for them by his Blood, and setled upon them in the Gospel-Charter? A Liberty from Satan, Sin, and the rigour and Curse of the Law; and yet you read, 1 Pet. 2. 16. of them that used this Li­berty for a cloak of maliciousness. 'Tis true, Christ came to be a Sacrifice for Sin, but not a Cloak for Sin; to set us at Liberty from the Bondage of our Lusts, not from the Ties and Duties of our Obe­dience. Under the pretence of this Li­berty it was, that the Gnosticks, Carpo­cratians, and the Menandrians of old, did not only connive at; but openly taught and practised all manner of leudness and uncleanness.

St. Augustin, Menan­driani omnem turpitudi­nem li­bentèr amplexi sunt, tan­quàm gra­tiae Dei erga ho­mines fru­ctum. Au­gust. Lib. de Haeres. in his Book of Heresy, makes this sad complaint, The Menandri­ans (saith he) do willingly embrace all un­cleanness as the fruit of the Grace of God towards Men. And not only the Liber­ty purchased by Christ, but the very Person and Gospel of Christ are liable to abuses; and oftentimes through the cor­ruptions of Mens hearts, become Stones of stumbling, and Rocks of offence. What then? Shall we renounce the Grace of God, our Christian Liberty, the very Gospel, yea, and Person of Christ himself, because each of them [Page 129] have been thus vilely abused by wicked wretches? At the peril of our eternal damnation be it, if we do so. Blessed is he (saith our Lord) that is not offended in me. Beware, lest by this means Sa­tan at once wound the Lord Jesus Christ by scandal, and thy Soul by prejudice.

Remedy II.

Consider also, that it is the nature and temper of a gracious Soul, to raise his esteem, and heighten his love to those Ordinances which are most abused and disgraced by Men.

The more they are abused and oppo­sed by others, the higher they should be valued and honoured by us; Psal. 119. 126, 127. It is time for thee, Lord, to work; for they have made void thy Law; therefore I love thy Commandments above gold, yea, above fine gold. q. d. The more they are disgraced and abused by wicked men, the more do I honour and prize them. A like spirit, with David's, was found in Elijah, 1 King. 19. 14. I have been very jealous for the Lord God of Hosts; because the Children of Israel have for­saken thy Covenant, thrown down thine Altars, and slain thy Prophets with the Sword.

[Page 130] A good Man will strive to honour and secure those Truths and Duties most, which he finds under most disgrace or danger. He loves the Truth sincerely, who cleaves to it, and stands by it under all opposition. This is a good tryal of the soundness of thy heart, and purity of thine ends in Religion: Such a proof, as the honour and reputation of Religion in the World can never give thee.

In Solomon's time the Iews were very cautious how they admitted and received Proselytes, suspecting that by-ends and worldly respects may draw men to it; but they were not so cautelous in times of disgrace and persecution.

Remedy III.

Before you part with any Ordinance or practice in Religion, bethink your selves whether you never found any spi­ritual blessings or advantages in that path which you are now tempted to for­sake.

Had you never any spiritual meltings of your hearts and affections in that Heaven­ly Ordinance of Singing? And may there not be now Thousands of Mercies in your possession in consequence to, and as the fruit of your solemn dedication to [Page 131] God in Baptism by your Covenanted Parents? For my own part, I do hearti­ly and solemnly bless God for it upon this account; and so I hope Thousands be­sides my self have cause to do. However, such a Practice may by no means be de­serted by you, because abused by others.

Cause XIII.

Another Method and Artifice, by which false Teachers draw multitudes of Disciples after them, is, by granting to their Ignorant and Ambitious Followers the LIBERTY of PROPHESYING; flattering them into a conceit of their ex­cellent Gifts and Attainments, when God knows they had more need to be Catechised and taught the Principles of Christianity, than undertake to expound and apply those profound Mysteries un­to others.

Satan hath filled the Church and World with Errors and Troubles this way.Stultissimiatque impi­issimi homines, non intel­ligentes nihil contrarium in rebus iisdem ab eodem dictum fuisse, verbis tantùm inhaerentes. causas ipsas di­ctorum reliquêrunt. Et di­versa quidem Scripturae dicta videntes, ad impieta­tem reciderunt, divinorum dictorum incapaces. Hila­rius, Lib. 1. de Trinit. When ignorant and unexperienced Persons begin to think it a low and a dull thing to sit from year to year under other mens teachings, and to [Page 132] fancy that they are wiser than their Teachers; their Pride will quickly tempt them to shew their Ignorance, and that mischievous Ignorance will prove dange­rous to the Truth, and troublesome to the Church. The Apostle forbids the Ordination of a Novice, lest he be puffed up, and fall into the condemnation of the Devil: and in 1 Tim. 1. 7. he shews us the reason why some swerved and turn­ed aside unto vain jangling; and it was this, That they desired to be Teachers of the Law, neither understanding what they said, nor whereof they affirmed. That is, They affected to be Preachers, though not able to speak congrucusly, with to­lerable sense and reason.

I do not here censure and condemn the use and exercise of the Gifts of all private Christians. There are to be found a­mongst them some Persons of raised parts, and answerable modesty and humility, who may be very useful, when called to service, in extraordinary Cases, by the Voice of Providence; or exercise their Gifts in a probationary way, or in due subordination unto Christ's publick Offi­cers and Ordinances, by, and with the consent of the Pastor, and Congrega­tion.

[Page 133] But when unqualified and uncalled Persons undertake such a work out of the conceit and pride of their own hearts, or are allured to it by the crafty Designs of Erroneous Teachers, partly to overthrow a publick, regular and standing Ministry in the Church, to which end the Scri­ptures are manifestly abused, such as Ier. 31. 34. Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Pet. 4. 10. with many others; This is the pra­ctise I here censure, which like a Trojan Horse, hath sent forth multitudes of Er­roneous Persons into the City of God to infest and defile it.

I cannot doubt but many a sincere Chri­stian may be drawn into such employment whichputs him into a capacity of honour­ing God in a more eminent way, which is a thing desirable to an honest and zea­lous heart: and that the temptation may be greatly strengthened upon them by the plausible suggestions of cunning Sedu­cers, who tell them, That those Ministers who oppose and condemn this practise, do it as men concerned for their own In­terest, as desirous to monopolize the work to themselves, and as envying the Lord's People: and that Christ hath gi­ven them a greater liberty in this case, than those men will allow them. By [Page 134] this means they daw many after them, and fix them in their Erroneous ways.

I have no mind at all here to expose the Follies and Mischiefs introduced this way, as neither being willing to grieve the hearts of the Sincere on one side, nor gratify scoffing Atheists, and pro­phane Enemies to Religion, upon the other side: only this I will, and must say, That by this means the Sacred Scri­ptures are most injuriously wrested, the Peace and Order of the Church disturbed, and a great many Mistakes and Errors introduced.

The Remedies.

The prevention and cure of Errors this way introduced, or likely to be introdu­ced into the Church, is by pondering and applying the following Considerations.

Consideration I.

Let all that encourage others, or un­dertake by others encouragement such a Work as this, for which they are not competently qualified, and unto which they are not regularly called, consider se­riously with themselves what danger they cast their own, and other mens Souls upon.

[Page 135] The Apostle tells us, 2 Pet. 3. 16. That the unlearned and unstable do wrest the Scriptures to their own destruction. Dan­ger enough, one would think, to scare them from it, did not the same sin of Ignorace, which makes them wrest the Scriptures, cause them also to slight and overlook the danger of so doing.Athana­s [...]s indi­cat Scripturas malitiosè intellectas & detortas, errores parere. Athanasius contra Apollinar.

Certainly, my Friends, it is a great deal safer, and more excusable, to put an ignorant Rustick into an Apothecary's Shop to compound a Medicine of Drugs and Spirits, which he understands not, and considently administer the same to the Bodies of men; than for such Persons as are led by ignorance and confidence, to intermeddle with the Ministerial Em­ployment: the one, perhaps, by mistake, may poison mens Bodies; but the other their Souls. An ignorant Master, or Pi­lot, that never learned the Compass, are rather to be trusted among Rocks and Quick-sands, than a proud ignorant Per­son with the conduct of Souls.

Consideration II.

What daring Presumption is it to in­trude our selves into so great and weigh­ty an Employment without any Call or Warrant of Christ! Rom. 10. 14. How shall they call upon him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a Preacher? and how shall they preach ex­cept they be sent?

These Mysteries must be committed to faithful Men, who shall be able to teach others. Those Abilities must be exami­ned, 1 Tim. 3. 10. and the Exercise of them warranted by a due and orderly ap­pointment thereunto, 1 Tim. 4. 14. else (as one well observes) In tàm praeposterâ disciplinae ruinâ tot essent sensus, quot ca­pita; tot dissensus, quot sensus; We shall have as many senses of Scripture, as we have Preachers, &c.

If every Phaeton, that thinks himself able, shall undertake to drive the Chariot of the Sun, no wonder if the World be set on fire. Gifts and Abilities of Mind are not of themselves sufficient to make a Preacher. Some Lawyers at the Bar may be as skilful as the Iudge upon the Bench, but without a Commission they dare not sit there.

Consideration III.

The honour you affect, to vent your unsound Notions with liberty, is in Scripture-account your greatest disho­nour.

The Scripture reckons false Teachers among the basest of the People: The Pro­phet that teacheth lyes, he is the Tayl, i. e. the basest part of the whole body of the People, Isa. 9. 15. And so far is due Gospel-Liberty from countenancing such dangerous Irregularities, that we find in a clear Prophecy of Gospel-times, what shame God will pour upon them, Zech. 13. 4, 5. They shall be brought with shame enough to confess, I am no Prophet, I am an Husband-man; for man taught me to keep Cattel from my youth.

Consideration IV.

How much more safe, regular and ad­vantageous were it for such as you, to fill your own proper Places under able and faithful Gospel-Ministers, and to suck the Breasts of fruitful Ordinances, than to consume and pine away by sucking your own Breasts? I mean, living upon your own weak and insufficient Gifts, in the sinful neglect of Christ's Appoint­ments?

Cause XIV.

False Teachers also propagate their Errors by a Spirit of ENTHVSIASM, the usual concomitant of Erroneous Do­ctrine; and draw away multitudes after them, by pretending to extraordinary Re­velations, Visions, and Voices from Heaven, which seem to give great credit to their Way and Party.Nonnul­li autem falsorum Prophetarum vaticinio illecti de quibus & veri Prophe­tae, & ipse praedixerat, exciderunt à doctrinâ Dei, & traditionem veram reliquerunt. Sed illi omnes daemoniacis fraudibus irretiti, quas prospicere & cavere debuerant, divinum nomen & cultum per imprudentiam perdiderunt. Lact. lib. 4. cap. 30. de Haeresibus.

This was an old trick and practice of Deceivers, Deut. 13. 1. to give Signs and Wonders in confirmation of their Way, which Signs the Lord may permit to fall out to prove his People, vers. 2. 3. tho, for the most part, they are confuted by their unanswerable Events.

In the beginning of our Reformation by Luther, Calvin, &c. there sprung up a Generation of Men, called Swenkfeldi­ans, great Pretenders to Revelations and Visions, who were always speaking of Deifications; and an higher strain of Lan­guage they commonly used among them­selves, than other serious Christians un­derstood, [Page 139] and therefore scornfully entit­led Orthodox and humble Christians, who stuck to the Scripture-phrase, and wholsome form of sound words, Gram­matists, Vocabulists, Literalists, &c. These Men (asIrretiti suis qui­busdam Enthusia­sticis la­queis, un­de se ex­tricari summam putant impietatem: dementabant multos magnificis istis verbis, Illumina­tio, Revelatio, Deificatio, &c. Scultetus in his Annals, ad annum 1525. Observes of them) were so entangled in certain Enthusiastick Snares, that they thought it the highest impiety to renounce them: and they had befooled multitudes with their magnificent words of Illumination, Revelation, Deification.

Much of the same Spirit was Thomas Muntzer, Iohn of Leyden, David George, Iacob Behmen, &c. whose cloudy Non­sense, aenigmatical Expressions, and wil­ful Obscurity, drew many into a strange admiration of them: They all pretend to an higher knowledge of Mysteries than what the Gospel is acquainted with; and and yet give us (as Mr. Baxter well ob­serves) neither Reasons with Aristotle, nor Miracles with Christ, and his Apo­stles, to cause us to believe any of their new Revelations. Vid. Baxter of the Sin against the Holy Ghost, p. 148.

[Page 140] Of the same Bran were our late Fami­lists in England, of whom Henry Nichols was the chief Leader, who decried the written Word as a dead Letter; and set up their own fond Conceits and Fancies under the notion of the Spirit; against whom that heavenly and Learned Man, Mr. Samuel Rutherford, seasonably and succesfully appeared. Hacket, Coppinger and Arthington, were of the same Tribe; who lived a-while wrapt up in Antino­mian Fancies, which at last brake forth into the highest and most horrid Blas­phemies.

Another Art they make use of to se­duce the Credulous, is a pretence unto the Spirit of Prophecy; and great suc­sess they promise themselves this way a­mong the weak, but curious Vulgar. And to this end Satan hath inspired and employed some Cunninger Heads to in­vent very pleasing Predictions and Pro­phecies, in favour of that Party whom he designs to deceive. And how catching and bewitching these things are, gaining more respect among these vain Spirits, than the divine unquestionable Prophe­cies of Scripture, this Age hath had full and sad experience.

[Page 141] Now the Design of Satan in these things, is to gain credit to those Sects, as People peculiarly favoured and belo­ved of God above others; as if they were the particular Favourites of Heaven, as Daniel was; and so to draw the Multi­tude to admire their Persons, and espouse their Errors.

The Remedies.

Now the Remedies in this Case are such as follow.

Remedy I.

Whatever Doctrine or Practice seeks credit to it self this way, falls justly thereby under suspicion, that it wants a solid Scripture-foundation.

God hath not left his People to seek satisfaction in such uncertain ways as these; but hath given them a surer word of Prophecy, to which they do well to take heed, 2 Pet. 1. 19. He hath tyed us to the standing Rule of the Word, for­bidding us to give heed to any other Voice, or Spirit, leading us another way, Isa. 8. 19. 2 Thess. 2. 1, 2. Gal. 1. 8. Scri­pture-light is a safe and sure Light, a pleasant and sufficient Light.

[Page 142] The Scripture (saith Luther) is so full, that as for Visions and Revelations, nec curo, nec desidero, I neither regard, nor desire them. And when he himself had a Vision of Christ after a day of fast­ing and prayer, he cried out, Avoid Sa­tan, I know no Image of Christ, but the Scripture. An hankering mind after these things, speaks a sickly and distem­pered state of Soul, as longing after Trash in young distempered Persons, doth a distempered state, or ill habit of Body.

Mr. William Bridges somewhere tells us of a Religious Lady of the Empresses Bed-chamber, whose name was Gregoria, who being greatly troubled about her Sal­vation, wrote to Gregory, That she would never cease importuning him, 'till he had sent her word, that he had obtained a Revelation from Heaven that she should be saved: to whom he returned this An­swer; Rem difficilem postulas & inutilem, Thou requirest of me that which is diffi­cult to me, and unprofitable for thee.

Remedy II.

Consider how often the World hath been abused by the Tricks and Cheats of that officious Spirit, the Devil, in such ways as these.

[Page 143] What hath propagated Idolatry a­mong Heathens and Christians more than this? Hinc fluxerunt multae peregrination­nes, Monasteria, delubra, dies festi & alia, saith Lavater, in Iob 33. Pilgrimages, Monasteries, Shrines of Saints, Holy­days, &c. have been introduced by this Trick. 'Twere endless to give Instances of it in the Histories of former Ages.Of the Prophesies, Visions and pretended Inspirations of Storke, Pfeiffer, Becold, Waren­dorp, &c. with the efficacy of them on the deluded People, and fatal con­sequences of them both to the Deceived, and Deceivers: See Mr. Samuel Rutherford's survey of the Spiritual Antichrist, p. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

We have a notable late Account of it among our selves, in a Book, entitled, [A Discovery of the notorious Falsehood and Dissimulation contained in a Book, sti­led, The Gospel-way confirmed by Mira­cles] Licensed and published 1649. wherein is laid open to the World, the free Confession of Ann Wells, Matthe [...] Hall, &c. deluding the People of What­field in Suffolk with such pretended Voices, Visions, Prophecies and Reve­lations, the like have scarcely been heard of in England since the Reformation. Multitudes of People were deluded by them.

[Page 144] At length the Lord extorted from this Woman a full Confession of the notorious falseness of these things, by a terrible Vi­sion of Hell: her Partizans laboured four days to suppress and stifle it, but to no purpose: for the Horrors of Con­science prevailed with her to confess the notorious Dissimulations contained in that Book, before the People of What­field, and a Justice of the Peace. And thus the Lord out-shot Satan in his own Bow.

Remedy III.

Consider how difficult, yea, and im­possible it is for a man to determine that such a Voice, Vision, or Revelation is of God; and that Satan cannot feign or counterfeit it; seeing he hath left no cer­tain marks by which we may distinguish one Spirit from another: an albus? an ater?

Sure we are, Satan can transform him­self into an Angel of Light; and there­fore abandoning all those unsafe and un­certain ways, whereby Swarms of Errors have been conveyed into the World, let us cleave inseparably to the sure Word of Prophecy, the Rule and Standard of our Faith and Duty.

Cause XV.

Another way in which False Teachers discover their Subtilty with great success, is, in TIMING their Assaults, and nicking the proper Season, when the minds of men are most apt and easy to be drawn away by their fair and specious Pretences.

Such a Season as this, they find about the time of mens first Conversion, or soon after their Implantation into Christ. Now it is that their Affections are most lively and vigorous, though their Judg­ments be but weak. They have now such strong and deep apprehensions of the Grace and Love of Christ, and such transcendent zeal for him, that they easily embrace any thing whereby they conceive he may be honoured and exalted. They have also such deep Apprehensions and powerful Aversations as to Sin, that they are in danger to fly even from Truth and Duty it felf, when it shall be artificially represented to them as Sin. For not only that which is malum per se, Sin indeed; but that which is male colo­ratum, painted with Sin's Colours, is apt to scare and fright them.

[Page 146] Besides, These young Converts or Novices have not had time to confirm and root themselves in the Truth; and Trees newly planted are much more ea­sily drawn up, than those that have spread and fastened their Roots in the Earth. 'Tis observable what a swarm of false Teachers troubled the Churches of Co­rinth, Galatia and Philippi, at, and new­ly after their first planting: and what danger those young Christians were in, abundantly appears in the Apostle's fre­quent Cautions and holy Jealousy over them: he bids them beware of Dogs, beware of Evil Workers, beware of the Concision, Phil. 3. 2. I fear lest by any means as the Serpent beguiled Eve through his s [...]btilty, so your minds be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ, 2 Cor. 11. 3. he was afraid of the Galatians, lest he had bestowed upon them labour in vain, Gal. 4. 11. he would not give place to false Brethren, no not for an hour, Gal. 2. 5. charges the Romans to receive them that were weak in the faith, but not to doubtful Disputations, Rom. 14. 1. All which, and many more Expressions, dis­cover his grounded jealousy, and their extraordinary danger of seduction at their first plantation. A Novice in Christianity [Page 147] is the Person Satan seeks for: strong Be­lievers are not in such apparent danger as little ones in Christ, 1 Iohn 5. 21. Lit­tle Children, keep your selves from Idols.

And the reason is, because keen Affe­ctions, match'd with weak Judgments, give a mighty advantage to Seducers. Children are apt to be taken with beauti­ful Appearances, and fine shews; and Erroneous Teachers have the very knack to set a glo [...]s of extraordinary sanctity upon their dangerous Opinions. Hence those Persons that promoted the Sect of the Nicolaitans, made use of a cunning Woman, who for her skill in painting Errors with the Colours of Truth, got the name of Iezebel, Rev. 2. 20. That Queen was famous for the art of Painting, 1 King. 16. and so was this false Prophe­tess: indeed there was scarce any emi­nent Sect of Errorists or Hereticks men­tioned in Church-history, but some cu­rious feminine Artist hath been employed to lay the beautiful Colours upon it. So we find Simon Magus had his Helena. Carpocrates his Marcellina. Montanus his Priscilla and Maximilla. And the curi­ous Colours of Holiness, Zeal and Free­grace, artificially laid upon the face of Error, how wrinkled and ugly soever in [Page 148] it self, sets it off temptingly and takingly to weak and injudicious Minds.

Moreover, Erroneous Teachers are great Boasters: they usually give out to the World what extraordinary Com­forts they meet with in their way, which proves a strong temptation to young Converts, who have been so lately in the depths of spiritual Trouble, to try at least, if not to embrace it, for the expe­cted Comforts sake.

Ah, how many pious Ministers in England, upon such Grounds and Pre­tences as these, have had their spiritual Children rent from them as soon as born! they have travailed as in birth for them; and no sooner did they begin to take com­fort in the success of their Labours, but to the great grief and discouragement of their hearts, they have been this way be­reaved of them. those that have owned them as their spiritual Fathers one month, would scarce vouchsafe to own them, when they have met them in the Streets another month. Many sad Instances I could give of this, and some as remark­able as they are fresh and recent: but I silence particulars. Oh see the advantage Satan and his Instruments gain by nick­ing such a critical Season as this is.

The Cure, or Remedy.

The Remedies in this case are twofold: the first respects the spiritual Fathers; and the second the spiritual Children: both are concerned in the danger, and the Lord help both to attend to their duty.

Remedy I.

Let all those whose Ministry God bles­ses with the desirable fruits of Conver­sion, look carefully after the Souls of young Converts.

No Nurse should be more tender and careful of her Charge, than a Minister should be: and unto the care of a tender Nurse, Paul compareth his care over the young Converts in Thessalonica, 1 Thess. 2. 7. for alas, they lie exposed to all dan­gers: they are credulous, and Seducers cunning: they want judgment to discern Truth from Error; have not yet attained unto Senses exercised, and Age in Christ to discern Good from Evil: when Er­rors are made palatable, Children will be hankering after them, and Seducers have the very art to make them so.

—Veluti pueris absynthia tetra medentes
Cum dare conantur, prius or as pocula circum
Contingunt dulci Mellis, flavóque liquore.

[Page 150] Shepherds look to your Flocks; imi­tate the great Shepherd of the Sheep, who gathereth the Lambs with his Arms, and carries them in his Bosome; visit them frequently, exhort and warn them diligently, and use all means to establish them in the present Truths.

Remedy II.

Let young Converts and weak Chri­stians look carefully to themselves by an heedful attendance unto the following Truths.

First, It is not safe to try, nor upon trial likely that you should find Christ in one way, and comfort in another. God doth not usually bless those ways to mens comfort and edification, into which they turn aside from that good way wherein they first met with Christ and Conver­sion. The same Ministry and Ordinances which are appointed and blessed for the one, are likewise appointed, and com­monly blessed for the other, Eph. 4. 11, 12, 13.

Secondly, 'Tis a manifest Snare of the Devil (and you may easily discern it) to take you off from the great Work you are newly engaged in, by entangling your minds in Notions that are for [...]ign to it. [Page 151] Your hearts are now warm with God, Satan labours this way to cool and quench them: the cunning Cheat labours to steal away the sweet and nutritive Food which is before you, and lay the hard and dry Bones of barren Controversies and insipid Notions in their room. Your business is not to frame Syllogisms, or study Solutions to cunning Arguments about lower and lesser matters, so much as it is by Prayer and Self-examination, to clear your Interest in Christ, and to solve those doubts that lie with weight upon your Spirits, with reference to that great Concern.

Thirdly, 'Tis a sad thing to grieve the hearts of those faithful Ministers that have travelled in pain for us, and rejoy­ced in our Conversion as the Seal of their Ministry. Oh, serve not your godly Ministers, as the Hen is sometimes ser­ved that hath long brooded, brought forth, and with much care and self­denial nourished up young Partridges, which as soon as fledged, take the wing, and return no more to her.

Cause XVI.

There is yet another Artifice of false Teachers to draw Men into Errors, and [Page 152] that is, by pressing the Consciences of those they have made some impressions upon, unto all HASTE and SPEED, openly to declare their new Opinions, and avow and own them before the World; as knowing that this will rivet and fix them to all intents and purposes.

When they find Men under half Con­victions, and strong inclinations to their way, they are sure then to ply them with a thick succession of Motives and Arguments, to joyn themselves by a free and open profession, to that erroneous Party which are headed by themselves.

And the Arguments usually pressed to this purpose are,

  • 1. The danger of delay.
  • 2. The comfort of declaring them­selves.

First, They press them with the dan­ger of the least delay, by telling them, That now they must live every day and hour in known sin, and hold the truth of God in unrighteousness, the evil where­of they skilfully aggravate; and the more tender and sensible the Conscience is, the deeper impressions such discourses make, although the Case, indeed, will not bear the weight they lay upon it, as having not that due allowance God [Page 153] gives of time and means of full infor­mation in matters of this nature; yea, possibly driving them into as great a snare by precipitation, and too hasty engagements under a Doubting Con­science.

Secondly, They press them to a quick resolution, with the expectations of a­bundance of comfort, inward peace and joy, which will result from a full en­gagement of themselves, and open decla­ration of their Judgment; proseliting to a Party, being the main design they drive at.

This was the very Art and Method by which Satan prevailed with Eve to swal­low the bait, Gen. 3. 5. For God doth know, that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil. q. d. The sooner thou tastest, the better; for the first taste will give thee a God-like know­ledg, and marvellous advancement of thy understanding; Didst thou but know the benefit that would accrue to thee there­by, thou would'st not delay one moment. And thus by setting before her the spee­dy and immediate benefits of eating, he prevailed, and drew her into the fatal snare.

[Page 154] In this the Ministers of Satan imitate the Ministers of Christ: As these press Men to make haste to Christ, lest by consulting with flesh and blood, and listening to the temptations of Satan, hopeful inclinations should be blasted in the bud; so the others push Men on to hasty resolutions, lest by hearkening to the voice of God's Spirit and their own Consciences, the design they have so far advanced should be lost and disappoint­ed. The Ministers of Christ urge Men to a speedy change of their Company, and to associate themselves with spiritual and profitable Christians, as well know­ing of what great use this will be to con­firm and strengthen them in the ways of God. So Errorists in like manner vehe­mently urge them to associate with their Party, as knowing how one wedges in and fixes another in the ways of Error; for such Causes Satan pushes on half-con­victions into hasty resolutions, quick dis­patch being his great advantage. This the Apostle intimates, Gal. 1. 6. I mar­vel (saith he) that ye are so soon remo­ved, &c. [...], what so soon! yes, if it had not been so soon, it might never have been at all; for Errors (as one ingeniously observes) like Fish, must [Page 155] be eaten fresh and new, or they'I quick­ly stink.

The Cure, or Remedy.

The Remedies and Preventatives in this Case, are such as follow:

Remedy I.

Consider, that hasty engagements in weighty and disputable matters, have cost many Souls dear.

As hasty Marriages have produced long and late repentance; so hath the clap­ping up of an hasty Match betwixt the Mind and Error. By entertaining strange persons, Men sometimes entertain Angels unaware; but by entertaining of strange Doctrines, many have entertained Devils unawares. 'Tis not safe to open the door of the Soul to let in strangers in the night; let them wait till a clear day­light of information shew you what they are.

Remedy II.

Weighty Actions require answerable Deliberations. It was the worthy say­ing of Augustus Caesar Satis co­leritèr fie­ri, quic­quid com­modè ge­ritur., That's soon e­nough, that's well enough. There be many things to be considered, and throughly [Page 156] weighed, before a Man change his judg­ment, and embrace a new Doctrine or Opinion. Luther, in his Epistle to the Ministers of Norimberg, cites an excel­lent passage out of Basil Multa anxiè con­siderare e­um opor­tet, & mul­tas noctes absumere insomnes, & cum multis la­chrymis petere à Deo veri­tatis de­monstra­tionem, qui se à fratribus separari vul [...]., He that is about to separate himself from the so­ciety of his Brethren, had need to consi­der many things even unto anxiety; to beg of God the demonstration of Truth with many tears, and to pass many solitary nights with waking eyes, before he attempt, or put such a matter in exe­cution. By the vote of the whole ratio­nal World, Time and Consideration ought to be proportionate to the weight of an Undertakement.

Remedy III.

The only season Men have to weigh things judiciously and impartially, is be­fore their affections be too far engaged, and their credit and reputation too much concerned.

Men are better able to weigh Do­ctrines and Opinions, whilst they are o­ther mens, than when they have espou­sed them and made them their own. Before an Opinion be espoused,Perit om­ne judici­um, cum res transit in affe­ctum. the Af­fections do not blind and pervert the Judgment, as they do afterward. Self­love [Page 157] Love pulls down the balance at that end which is next us. If therefore by hasty resolution, you lose this only proper and advantagious season of deliberation, you are not like to find such another.

Remedy IV.

Trust not to the clearness of your own unassisted eyes, nor to the strength of your single reason; but consult in such cases, with others that are pious and ju­dicious, especially your godly and faith­ful Ministers; and hearken to the Coun­sels they give you. Paul justly wonder­ed that the Galatians were so soon remo­ved; and well he might: For had they not a Paul to consult with, before they gave their consent to false Teachers? Or if he was at a distance from them about the work of the Lord in remote places, had they no godly and judicious Friends near them, whose Prayers and assistances they might call in, as Daniel did? Dan. 2. 17. Wo unto him that is alone in a time of temptation, except the Lord be with him by extraordinary assistance and direction.

Remedy V.

Lastly, Suspect that Opinion (as just­ly you may) for erroneous, that's too importunate and pressing upon you, and will not allow you due time of conside­ration, and means of information. That which is a truth to day, will be a truth to morrow: But that which looks like a truth to day, may be detected, and look like it self, an odious Error to morrow. And this is the reason of that post-haste that Satan and his Factors make to gain our present consent, lest a speedy de­tection frustrate the suit, and spoil the design. The Vses follow in Six Con­sectaries.

Consectary I.

From all that hath been said about Er­rors, we see in the first place, the great usefulness and plain necessity of an able, faithful, standing Ministry in the Church.

One special end of the Ministry, is the establishment of the peoples Souls against the Errors of the times, Eph. 4. 11, 14. He gave some Apostles, &c. that we hence­forth be no more children tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of do­ctrine by the sleight of men, &c. Ministers [Page 159] are Shepherds, and without a Shepherd, how soon will the flock go astray? Moses was absent but a few days from the Israe­lites, and at his return found them all run into the snares of Idolatry. A Sheep is animal sequax, a creature that follows a Leader. One stragler may mislead a whole flock. A Minister's work is not only to feed, but to defend the flock. I am set (saith Paul) for the defence of the Gospel, Phil. 1. 17. An Orthodox and Faithful Minister, is a double blessing to the people; but wo to that people, whose Ministers, instead of securing them against Errors, do cause them to err, Isa. 9. 16. they are the Dogs of the Flock. Some in Scrip­ture are called dumb dogs, who, instead of barking at the Thief, bite the Chil­dren: But faithful Ministers give warn­ing of spiritual dangers. So did the worthy Ministers of London, Worcester­shire, Devon, &c. in their Testimonies against Errors.

Consectary II.

This discourse shews us also how little quietness and peace the Church may ex­pect, till a greater degree of light and unity be poured out upon it; what by [Page 160] persecutions from without it, and trou­bles from within, little tranquility is to be expected. 'Tis a Note of St. Bernards, that the Church hath sometimes had pa­cem à Paganis, sed rarò aut nunquam à filiis, peace sometimes from Pagan Persecutors, but seldom or never any peace from her own Children.

We read, Zech. 14. 7. the whole state of the Christian Church, from the pri­mitive days, to the end of the World, set forth under the notion of one day, and that a strange day too, the light of it shall neither be clear nor dark, nor day nor night, but at evening time it shall be light; i. e. a day full of interchangeable and alternate providences. Sometimes persecutions, heresies and errors prevail, and these make that part of the day dark and gloomy; and then Truth and Peace break forth again, and clear up the day. Thus it hath been, and thus it will be until the evening of it, and at even-time it shall be light; then light and love shall get the ascendant of error and divisions. Most of our scuffles and contentions are for want of greater measures of both these.

Consectary III.

From the manifold Causes and Mis­chiefs of Errors before mentioned, we may also see what a choice mercy it is to be kept sound in judgment, stedfast and unmovable in the Truths and Ways of Christ. A sound and stedfast Chri­stian is a blessing in his Generation, and a glory to his Profession. 'Twas an high Encomium of Athanasius, Sedem ma­luit mutare, quam syllabam: He would rather lose his Seat, than a syllable of God's Truth. Soundness of Judgment must needs be a choice Blessing; be­cause the understanding is the [...], that leading-faculty which directs the Will and Conscience of Man, and they his whole Life and Practice. How often and how earnestly doth Christ pray for his people, that they may be kept in the Truth? 'Tis true, Orthodoxy in its self is not sufficient to any man's Salva­tion; but the conjunction of an Ortho­dox head, with an honest sincere heart, does always constitute an excellent Chri­stian, Phil. 1. 10. Happy is the man that hath an head so hearted, and an heart so headed.

Consectary IV.

By this discourse we may further dis­cover one great and special cause and reason of the lamentable decay of the spirit and power of Religion, amongst the Professors of the present Age.

'Tis a complaint more just than com­mon, That we do all fade as a leaf. And what may be the Cause? Nothing more probable than the wasting of our time and spirits in vain janglings and fruit­less controversies, which the Apostle tells us, Heb. 13. 9. have not profited, i. e. they have greatly damnified and injured them that have been occupied therein. Many Controversies of these times grow up about Religion, as Suckers from the Root and Limbs of a Fruit-tree, which spend the vital Sap that should make it fruitful.

Anglia 4. annis facta est colluvies, & lerna omnium errorum, & secta­rum. Nulla à condito orbe provincia tam parvo spatio tot monstrosas haereses protulit atque haec. Honor. Reg. de Statu Eccles. Brittan. p. 1. 'Tis a great and sad Observation made upon the state of England by some judicious persons, That after the greatest increase of Religion, both intensively in the power of it, and extensively in the number of Converts, what a remarka­ble [Page 163] decay it suffered both ways, when about the year Forty-four, Controver­sies and Disputations grew fervent a­mong Professors. Since that time our strength and glory have very much a­bated.

Consectary V.

From this Discourse we may also ga­ther, the true Grounds and Reasons of those frequent Persecutions which God lets in upon his Churches and People: These rank Weeds call for Snowy and Frosty Weather to subdue and kill them.

I know the enemies of God's People aim at something else: They strike at Profession, yea, at Religion it self; and according to their wicked intention, without timely Repentance, will their reward be. But whatever the inten­tion of the Agents be, the issues of Per­secution are upon this account greatly beneficial to the Church; the Wisdom of God makes them excellently useful, both to prevent and cure the mischiefs and dangers of Errors. If Enemies were not, Friends and Brethren would be injurious to each other. Persecution, if it kills not, yet at least it gives check [Page 164] to the rise and growth of Errors: And if it do not perfectly redintigrate and unite the hearts of Christians, yet to be sure it cools and allays their sinful heats; and that two ways: (1.) By cutting out for them far better and more necessary work. Now, instead of racking their Brains about unnecessary Controversies, they find it high time to be searching their hearts, and examining the founda­tions of their Faith and Hope, with re­spect to the other World. (2.) More­over, such times and straights, discover the Sincerity, Zeal and Constancy of them we were jealous of, or prejudiced against before, because they followed not us.

Consectary VI.

Lastly, Let us learn hence, both the Duty and Necessity of Charity and mu­tual Forbearance; We have all our mi­stakes and errors one way or other, and therefore must maintain mutual Charity under dissents in judgment.

I do not say, but an erring Brother must be reduced if possible, and that by sharp rebukes too, if gentler essays be ineffectual, Tit. 1. 13. and the wounds of a Friend have more faithful love in [Page 165] them, than the kisses of an Enemy: And if God make us instrumental by that or any other method, to recover a Brother from the error of his way, he will have great cause, both to bless God, and thank the Instrument, who thereby saves a Soul from death, and hides a multitude of sins, Iam. 5. 20. 'Tis our Duty, if we meet an Enemy's Ox or Ass going astray, to bring him back again; Exod. 23. 4. much more the Soul of a Friend. Indeed, we must not make those Errors that are none, nor stretch every innocent expression to that purpose; nor yet be too hasty in medling with contention, till we cannot be both silent and inno­cent; and then whatever the expence be, Truth will repay it.

AN APPENDIX: Containing a Full and Modest Re­ply to Mr. Philip Cary's Rejoinder to my Vindiciae Legis & Foederis.

Manifesting the badness of his Cause, in the feebleness and impertinency of his Defence. And adding farther light and strength to the Arguments formerly produced in defence of God's gracious Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. and the right of Believers Infants to Baptism, grounded thereupon.

SIR,

NEXT to the not deserving a Reproof, is the due reception and improvement of it. You deserve a sharper reprehension for your timerity and obstinacy, than I am wil­ling to give you from the Press. Yet in love to the Truth, and your own Soul, reprove you I must, and I hope God will [Page 168] enable me to be both mild in the manner, and convincingly clear in the matter and cause thereof. 'Tis better to lose the Smiles, than the Souls of men. I dare not neglect the duty of a Friend, for fear of incurring the suspicion of an Enemy. Several Learned and Eminent Divines who have seen what hath publickly pas­sed betwixt you and me, have returned me their thanks, and think you ought to thank me too for the pains I have taken to set you right, hoping you will evidence your self-denial and repentance by an in­genuous retractation of your Errors.

But how will you deceive their Expe­ctations, and unbecome the Character gi­ven you by your Friends, when they shall find the true measure both of your ability and humility drawn by your own Pen in the following Rejoinder?

I have throughly considered your Re­ply in the Manuscript you sent me, which I hear is now in the Press; and in the following Sheets have given a full, and (I think) a final Answer to whatsoever is material therein. And it so falling out, that my Discourse of Errors was just go­ing under the Press, whilst your Rejoin­der was there also, I thought it not con­venient to delay my Reply any longer, [Page 169] but to have my Antidote in as great rea­diness as might be to meet it.

One Inconvenience I easily foresee, that the Pages of your Manuscript, which I follow, may not throughout exactly an­swer to the Print: But every intelligent Reader will easily discern and rectify That, if my Bookseller save him not that trouble, as I have desired him to do.

As to the Controversy about the Right of Believers Infant-seed to Baptism, you have altogether adventured it the second time with the consent of your Partizans, upon the three Hypotheses, which (if I mistake not) I have fully confuted and baffled in my first Answer. But if my brevity occasioned any obscurity in that, I hope you shall find it sufficiently done here. Mean time you have given, and I accordingly take it for granted, that our Arguments for Infants Baptism stand in their full strength against you, 'till you can better discharge and free your dangerous Assertions from the Errors and Absurdities in which they are now more involved and intricated than be­fore.

[Page 170] The weaker any thing is, the more querulous it is. If Scripture-Argu­ment, and clear Reason, will not sup­port the Cause I undertake, I am re­solved never to call in passionate Inve­ctives and weak Evasions for my Auxi­liaries, as you have here done. The Lord give us all clearer Light, tenderer Consciences, exemplary Humility and Ingenuity.

Vindiciarum Vindex: OR, A REFUTATION OF THE Weak and Impertinent Rejoinder OF Mr. PHILIP CARY:

Wherein he vainly attempts the de­fence of his Absurd Thesis, to the great abuse and injury of the Laws and Covenants of God.

AND must I be dipt once more in the Water-Controversy? 'tis time for me to think of undres­sing my self, and making ready for my approaching Rest, and employ those few moments I have to spend, in more Practical and Beneficial Studies, for my [Page 172] own, and the Churches greater advantage. And 'tis time for Mr. C. to reflect upon his past Follies, which have consumed too much of his own, and others time, without any advantage; yea, to the ap­parent loss and injury of the Cause he un­dertakes to defend.

When I received these Sheets from him, in vindication of his Solemn Call, I was at a stand in my own Resolutions, whe­ther to let it pass (without any Animad­versions upon it) as a passionate Clamor for a desperate Cause; or give a short and full Answer to his confused and im­pertinent Rejoinder. But considering that I had under hand at the same time the foregoing Treatise of the Causes and Cures of Mental Errors; and that though my honest Neighbour discovers much weakness in his way of Argumentation, yet it was like to meet with some intere­sted Readers, to whom, for that reason, it would be the more suitable; and how apt such Persons are to glory in the last word; but especially considering that a little time and pains would suffice (as the Case stands) to end the unseasonable Controversy betwixt [...] us, and both clear and confirm many great and weighty Points of Religion: I was upon these [Page 173] Considerations prevailed with, against my own Inclination, to cast in these few Sheets as a Mantissa to the former seaso­nable and necessary Discourse of Errors, resolving to fill them with what should be worth the Reader's time and pains.

As for the rude Insults, uncomely Re­flections, and passionate Expressions of my discontented Friend, I shall not throw back the dirt upon him, when I wipe it off from my self: I can easily forgive and forget them too. The best men have their Passions, Iam. 5. 17. even Sweet-briers and Holy-Thistles have their offensive Prickles. I consider my honest Neighbour under the strength of a Temptation. It disquiets him to see the Labours of many years, and the raised Expectations of so great a conquest and triumph over men of Renown, all frustrated by his Friend and Neighbour, who had done his utmost to prevent it; and often foretold him of the folly and vanity of his Attempt. Every thing will live as long as it can, and natura vexat a prodit seipsam. But certainly it had been more for Truth's honour, and Mr. C's comfort, to have confessed his Follies humbly to God, and have laid his hand upon his mouth.

[Page 174] The things in controversy betwixt us, are great and weighty, viz. The true nature of the Sinai Laws, in their com­plex body; the quality of God's Cove­nant with Abraham; and the dispensa­tion of the New Covenant we are now under. These are things of great weight in themselves; and their due Resolutions are at this time somewhat the more weighty, because my Antagonist hath adventured the whole Controversy of In­fants Baptism upon them.

I have in my Vindiciae Legis, &c. sta­ted the several Questions clearly and di­stinctly. Shewn Mr. C. what is no part of the Controversy, and what is the very hinge upon which it turns; desired him, if he made any Reply, to keep close to the just and necessary Rules of Dispu­tation, by distinguishing, limiting, or denying any of my Propositions; that the matters in Controversy might be put to a fair and speedy issue. But instead of that, I meet with a flood of words rolling sometimes to this part, and then to ano­ther part of my Answer, and so back again, without the steddy direction of Art or Reason. There may, for ought I know, be some things of weight in Mr. Cary's Reply, if a man could fee [Page 175] them for words: but without scoff or vanity I must say of the rational part of it, as the Poet said of the overdressed Woman,—Pars minima est ipsa Puella sui, 'tis the least part of it. To follow him in his irregular and extravagant way of writing, were to make my self guilty of the same folly I blame him for. I am therefore necessitated to perstringe them, and reduce all I have to say, under three general Heads.

  • I. I shall clearly evince to the World, That Mr. Cary hath not been able to discharge and free his own Theses from the horrid Consequents, and gross Absurdities which I laid to their charge in my first Reply; but instead thereof, in this feeble and un­successful attempt to free the former, he hath entangled himself in more and greater ones.
  • II. That he hath left my Arguments standing in their full strength a­gainst him.
  • III. And then I shall confirm and strengthen my three Positions, which destroy the Cause he ma­nages, by some further Additions of Scripture, Reason and Authori­ties, [Page 176] which I hope will fully end this matter betwixt us.

But before I touch the Particulars, two things must be premised for the Reader's due information.

1. That the Controversie about the true nature of the Sinai Laws, both Mo­ral and Ceremonial, complexly consi­dered, is not that very Hinge upon which the Right of Believers Infants to Baptism depends: that stands as it did before, be the Sinai Laws what they will. We do not derive the Right of Infants from any other Law or Covenant, but that graci­ous Covenant which God made with Abraham, which was in being 430 years before Moses his Law;Gal. 3. 17. and was no way injured, much less disannulled, by the addition of it. If Abraham's Covenant be the same Covenant of Grace we are now under, the Right of Believers In­fants to Baptism, is secured, whatever the Sinai Convenant prove to be. Which I speak not out of the least jealousie that Mr. Cary hath, or ever shall be able to prove it to be a pure Adam's Covenant of Works; but to prevent Mistakes in the Reader.

[Page 177] 2. It must be heedfully observed also, that how free, gracious and absolute soe­ver the New Covenant be, (for God for­bid that I should go about to eclipse the glory of Free-grace on which my Soul depends for Salvation) yet that will ne­ver prove Abraham's Covenant to be an abolished Adam's Covenant of Works, unless two things more be proved, which I never expect to see, viz.

First, That Abraham, and his believing Posterity, were bound by the very nature and act of Circumcision to keep the whole Law in their own persons in or­der to their Justification and Salvation, as perfectly and perpetually, and under the same penalty for the least failure, as Adam was to keep the Law in Paradise.

Secondly, It must be further proved, That Abraham, and all his believing Off­spring, who stood with him under that Covenant, whereof Circumcision was the initiating Sign, were all saved in a different way from that in which Be­lievers are now saved under the Gospel: for so it must be, if the addition of Cir­cumcision made it unto them an Adam's Covenant of Works. But this would be a direct contradiction to the words of the Apostle, speaking of them who were un­der [Page 178] the Covenant of Circumcision, Acts 15. 11. But we believe, that through the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ, we shall be saved even as they. If he say, they stood indeed under that Covenant, as a pure Covenant of Works, but were saved by another Covenant; and so for many Ages the Church of God stood absolutely under the Covenant of Works, and at the same time under the pure Covenant of Grace; the one altogether absolute and free, the other wholly conditional: and though these two be in their own natures incon­sistent and destructive of each other, yet so it was, that all the Saints for many Ages were absolutely under the one, and yet purely under the other: shall I be then censured for saying he speaks pure contradiction?

Possibly my Reader will be tempted to think I abuse him, and that no man of common sense can be guilty of such an horrid Absurdity. I must, whatever re­spect I have for Mr. C. once more tell him before the World, that this is not only his own Doctrine, but that very Doctrine upon which he hath adventured the whole Cause and Controversie of In­fants Baptism, which I therefore say is hereby become a desperate Cause.

[Page 179] And this brings me to my first general Head, viz.

I. First, That Mr. Cary hath not been able to free his Thesis from this borrid ab­surdity; but by strugling to do it, hath (according to the nature of Errors) entang­led himself in more and greater ones.

Mr. Cary, in p. 174, 175. of his So­lemn Call, was by me reduced to this Ab­surdity, which he there owns in express words, ‘That Moses, and the whole body of the People of Israel, were absolutely under (without the exception of any) the severest penalties of a dreadful Curse; and that the Sinai Covenant could be no other than a Covenant of Works, a mi­nistration of death and condemnation; and yet at the same time, both Moses, and all the Elect, were under a pure Cove­nant of Gospel-grace: And if these were two contrary Covenants in themselves, and just opposite the one to the other, as indeed they were, we have nothing to say, but with the Apostle, O the depth, &c.’

This, Reader, is the Position which must be made good by Mr. Cary, or his Cause is lost. Deformed Issues do not look as if they had beautiful Truth for their Mother. No false or absurd Con­clusion [Page 180] can regularly follow from true Premisses: But hence naturally and ne­cessarily follows this

Absurdity I.

That Abraham, Moses, and all the Believers under the Old Testament, by standing absolutely under Adam's Cove­nant of Works, as a ministration of death and condemnation; and at the same time purely under the Covenant of Grace (as Mr. C. affirms they did) must necessarily, during their lives, hang mid­way betwixt Life and Death, Justifica­tion and Condemnation; and after death, midway betwixt Heaven and Hell. Du­ring life, they could neither be justified nor condemned. Justified they could not be, for Justification is the Soul's passing from death to life, 1 Iohn 3. 14. Iohn 5. 24. Upon a man's justification his Covenant and State are changed; but the Cove­nant and State of no man can be so changed as long as he remains absolutely under the severest Penalties and condem­nation of the Law, as Mr. C. affirms they did.

Again, Condemned they could not be, seeing all that are under the pure Co­venant of Grace (as he saith they were [Page 181] at the same time) are certainly in Christ; and to such there is no condemnation, Rom. 8. 1. nor ever shall be: Ioh. 5. 24. He that believeth, shall not come into con­demnation, but is passed from death unto life. What remains then, but that du­ring life, they could neither be perfectly justified, nor perfectly condemned; and yet being absolutely under the severest Penalties of Adam's Covenant, they were perfectly condemned; and again, being under the pure Covenant of Grace, they must be perfectly justified?

And then after death, they must nei­ther go to Heaven, nor Hell; but either be annihilated, or stick mid-way in Lim­bo Patrum (as the Papists fancy) betwixt both. No condemned Person goes to Heaven, nor any justified Person to Hell. His Position therefore, which necessarily infers this gross Absurdity, is justly re­nounced and detested by Learned and Or­thodox Divines.

The Learned and Acute Turrettine, Turret. pars 2da, pag. 290. the late famous Professor of Divinity at Geneva, proving that the Sinai Law could not be a pure Covenant of Works, brings this very Medium to prove it, as a known truth, allowed by all men. ‘The Israelites (saith he) with whom [Page 182] God covenanted, were already under Abraham's Covenant, which was a Co­venant of Grace; and were saved in Christ by it; therefore they could not be under the Legal Covenant. Nemo enim simul potest duo [...]us foederibus totâ specie distinctis subesse; because no man can be under two Covenants specifically different at the same time, as these two are.’

That Great and Renowned Divine Mr. William Strong, Mr. Strong on the Co­venant, p. 66, 67. gives four irrefra­gable Arguments to prove, that no man can stand under both these Covenants at the same time, which in co-ordination actually destroy and make void each o­ther. ‘If the First Covenant stand, there is no place for the Second; and if the Second stand, the first is made void. And this (saith he) will fully ap­pear, if we consider the direct contrarie­ty in the terms of those two Covenants. For (1.) the Righteousness of the first Covenant is in our selves; but the Righteousness of the Second is the Righteousness of another, 1 Ioh. 5. 11. 12. (2.) In the Covenant of Works, acceptation is first of the Works, and afterwards of the Person; Gen. 4. 7. but in the Covenant of Grace, the ac­ceptation [Page 183] is first of the Person, and then of the Work, Gen. 4. 4. (3.) The First Covenant was a Covenant with­out a Priest, but the Second is a Cove­nant with a Priest. (4.) In the First Covenant there is matter of glorying, but in the Second there is none, Rom. 3. 27. So that these two can never consist, except you can compound, or reconcile these four Opposites in the ju­stification of the same Person.’

To the same purpose, saith that Ex­cellent Mr. Samuel Bolton. Bolton's Bounds, p. 133. ‘If the Law were a Covenant of Works, then were the Iews under a different Covenant from us, and so none of them were saved, which the Apostle gainsays, Acts 15. 11. or else they were both un­der a Covenant of Works, and a Cove­nant of Grace. But that they could not be;’ they are utterly inconsistent▪ Ergo. And thus all sound Divines speak. I may therefore say of Mr. Cary's Posi­tion, as Ruveus before me did, omnem ab­surditatem excedere videtur, it seemeth to exceed all Absurdities. A man may more rationally suppose two Natures and es­sential Forms in one Body, and place the same thing under divers Species in the predicament of substance: yea, 'twere more [Page 184] tolerable to affirm, That ex duobus enti­bus per se fit unum ens per se, than to place any (as Mr. C. places all) of God's People under two opposite Covenants. If Mr. C. were absolutely under the con­demnation of the Law, would he not be purely justified, think you? Yet he pla­ces Abraham, Moses, and all Believers with them, absolutely under the severest condemnation of the Law, and the pure Gospel [...]Covenant, at once.

But to cover the shame and nakedness of his Assertion, which places Believers absolutely under Adams Covenant, he is fain to make use of two Fig-leaves, as Adam did.

(1.) And the first attempt he now makes, p. 4, 5, 6, 7. of his Reply, is by way of retortion, by telling us, ‘That the same pretended Absurdities do fall as heavily, and a great deal more, on our Doctrine, who affirm the Sinai Law (com­plexly taken) to be a Covenant of Faith, or Grace, than upon his who makes them two essentially different Covenants: be­cause we are forced to comprize perfect doing, with the curse for non-performance, under the same Covenant with believing: and that it cannot be denied but that all the People of God were absolutely under [Page 185] the Sinai Covenant, Gal. 3. 23. and Gal. 4. 4, 5. and consequently under the curse, Gal. 3. 10.’ This is the sum and substance of his first Answer.

I will not be tempted to expose my Neighbour to derision for this his strange Answer;Reply. but rather propound two sober Queries to him, and the Reader, viz. (1.) What Orthodox Divines he ever met with, and what are their names, who are forced to comprize perfect do­ing, with the curse for non-performance, under the same Covenant with believing: and so make the two opposite Covenants to be specifically one and the same? Name your Men, with their Books and Pages; or retract with shame and sorrow what you have here abusively affirmed of them. Cameron indeed makes it a subservient Covenant; the most a true, though ob­scure Covenant of Grace; but none com­prize Adam's Covenant with its Curse, in the New Covenant. (2.) Whether it be imaginable, That the same Absurdity can follow from their Doctrine, that make the whole complex body of the Sinai Law a Covenant of Grace, though more ob­scure, and so place all the People of God in those Ages under it▪ as does necessa­rily follow his Doctrine, who makes it a [Page 186] pure Adam's Covenant of Works, and places the Church of God absolutely un­der the curse of it, and also under the pure Covenant of Grace at the same time? If Grace and Grace (how diffe­ferent soever in degrees of manifestation) be as opposite and repugnant, as Grace and Works, as Justification and Condem­nation are, 'tis time for me to lay down my Pen; for I have certainly lost my Understanding to guide it any further.

But Mr. Cary will say, If you do not, yet Mr. Roberts doth comprize both in one Covenant. I say, you abuse Mr. Ro­berts in so affirming: for he saith in that very place you refer toRoberts on the Co­venant, pag. 775, 776, 777., That believing in Christ was ultimately and chiefly in­tended in the Sinai Covenant; and per­fect doing was only urged upon Israel in subordination and tendency to that be­lieving. And upon that ground it is he affirms that Covenant to be a Covenant of Faith, and so denominates it from the chief scope and intent of it. He sets not doing and believing in co-ordination, or places the Church under two opposite Covenants, as you do; but places the Law, where it ought to be placed, in subordination to Faith and Christ. And therefore you have abused that good Man, [Page 187] as well as me, and your self most of all in this your first impertinent and silly Answer.

(2.) But you have one Evasion more, p. 7. where you say, That how harsh and dreadful soever the Terms or Condi­tions of the Legal Covenant were to those that were under it, as Moses, and the whole body of the Israelites, then were; yet the grace of the Gospel-Covenant far superseded, and was by far more victorious, powerful, and efficacious, Rom. 5. 17, 20.’

Worse and worse.Reply. Your Discourse mends like sower Ale in Summer. Here you fancy the two Covenants (under which you place the whole Church of God) to be in a conflict one with the o­ther; Condemnation and Justification strugling one with another, as I told you before they would: but however, the Grace of the New Covenant pre­vails at last, and gets the victory over the Covenant of Works. Very good; but then pray, Sir, if you please, answer me a plain Question or two at your leisure.

First, How far did the Covenant of Grace prevail against the Covenant of Works? Was it so far prevalent and victo­rious as utterly to vanquish and disannul [Page 188] it, as a Covenant of Works to them? or was it not? Was the Victory you speak of, a compleat, or a partial one? If you say it was incompleat and partial, then you leave them (as I told you be­fore you must) partly under the Promise, and partly under the Curse; justified in part, and condemned in part. But if you say, it was a compleat and perfect Victory, then it utterly dissolved its ob­ligation as a Covenant of Works; then they did not remain under two opposite Covenants, as you affirmed they did; but on their believing, changed their state with their Covenant, as we affirm they did.

Secondly, If you say, it did not totally free them from the Curse of the Cove­nant of Works, but however prevailed so far that they were not actually damned by vertue of the Curse; then be pleased to answer me one Question more, How it was possi [...]le for them to be absolutely un­der the Curse of the Law (as you affirmed they were) and yet that Curse to be so su­perseded by the Covenant of Grace, as here you speak?

To supersede the Curse (though it be a Phrase I never met with before) if it sig­nify any thing, it must signify this; That [Page 189] the Covenant of Grace caused the Law to omit, forbear, or give over to curse that People any more. But did, or can the Law forbear or cease to curse those that are absolutely under it as a ministra­tion of death and condemnation? Pray consult, Rom. 3. 19. and Gal. 3. 10. Are you aware what you say, when you place Believers absolutely under the Curse of the Law, and then talk of the New Covenant's victory over it; and after all this, leave them as you do, ab­solutely under the cursing power of the one; and still under the victorious grace of the other? For shame, my Friend, give up your absurd notion, and repent of this folly. I would not willingly shame you before the World; I did all that lay in me to prevent it. But how­ever, Pudor est medicina pudoris, the only way you have left me to prevent your glorying in your shame, is this way, to make you ashamed of your vain-glory. As for that Scripture you alledge to coun­tenance your fancy, Rom. 5. 17, 20. you might to as good purpose have opened your Bible, and have taken the first Scri­pture that came to hand, and it would have done your Position less harm. For the Apostle's scope there, is to demon­strate [Page 190] the perfection of the abounding Righteousness of Christ, for the full dis­charge of Believers from the guilt of sin, and curse of Adam's Covenant; and cuts the throat of your Position, which it is alledged to prove.

I have stood the longer upon the clear­ing of this first Point; because this being fully cleared, it runs through and clears the whole Controversy betwixt us. For now it will be evident to all, That nei­ther Abraham's, nor Moses his Covenant (complexly taken, as Mr. Cary takes it) could possibly be for this reason, an Adam's Covenant of Works; and if not a Covenant of Works, then how dark or legal soever the Dispensations of them were, they must needs be the same Co­venant of Grace, for substance, under which we are, and so the main Contro­versy betwixt us is hereby at an end.

I know not how many Covenants of Works, or how many of Grace, Mr. C. fancies there are; But Orthodox Divines constantly affirmVid. Bol­ton's Bounds, p. 148., That as there never were but two ways of Life to mankind, the one before the Fall, by perfect do­ing▪ the other after the Fall, by sincere believing: So answerably there can be but two Covenants betwixt God and [Page 191] Mankind, viz. the Covenant of Works, and the Covenant of Grace. The last of which hath, indeed, been more obscure­ly Administred, and in that respect is called the Old Covenant; yet that and the New are essentially but one Cove­nant: And the Church of God, which for many Ages stood under that Old Co­venant, did not stand under it as an Adam's Covenant, or the First Covenant of works, for the undeniable Reasons above given. And therefor Abraham's Covenant, from whence we derive our Childrens Title to Baptism, must of ne­cessity be the very same Covenant for substance with this New Covenant, which all Abraham's believing off-spring, and their Infant-seed are now under. And in proving this one point, I have sufficiently confuted both Mr. C's Solemn Call, and this his feeble vindication of it, together.

But lest he should take this for the only Absurdity proved upon him, tho' it be tiresome to me, and must be un­grateful to him; give me leave to touch one more among many; and that the rather, because I make great use of it in this Controversy, and Mr. Cary both yields and denies it. If his own words [Page 192] be the Messengers of his meaning, ei­ther he, or I, must mistake their er­rand.

I had in my Prolegomena, distinguished of the Law, as strictly taken for the Ten Commandments; and more largely and complexly taken, as including the Cere­monial Law. The former I considered according to God's intention and design in the prom [...]lgation of it, which was to add it as an Appendix to the Promise, Gal. 3. 19. And the carnal Iews mista­king and perverting the end of the Law, and making it to themselves a Covenant of Works, by making it the very Rule and Reason of their ju­stification before God, Rom. 9. 32, 33. Rom. 10. 3. I told him, That the Con­troversy depended upon this double sense of the Law, for that it ought not to be denominated from the abused and mistaken End of it; but from God's chief scope and design in the promulgation of it, which was to add it as an Appendix to the Promise, as the word [...] there imports; and so must be pub­lished with Evangelical purposes. Let us now hear Mr. C's sense of this mat­ter.

In his Call, p. 131. he yields the distincti­on in these words.In his Reply, p. 43. proving the Law to be a Covenant of Works, from Rom. 10. 5. he saith,
The Jews were right enough in re­ference to the true nature of the Law, That it was a Cove­nant of Works, &c. though they were out in respect of its pro­per use and intention, which was not, that any should attain un­to Life and Righte­ousness thereby; but to shew them the na­ture of Sin, and the Holiness and Righ­teousness of God; to convince them of their sin and misery without Christ, and their necessity of a Saviour; which they being ignorant of, and still going about to establish the [...]r own Righteousness which was of the Law, and [Page 194] refusing to submit themselves unto the righteousness of God, &c. they stumbled at that stumbling stone, and were accordingly broken, snared, and taken, Rom. 9. 31, 32, 33. Rom. 10. 3. And this (saith he) was the true ground of the dispute between the Apostle and them. This was Or­thodoxly spoken, and would end the Controversy, would he stand to it. ButThis was the na­ture of it in the first sanction of it, as the fruit of God's special designation and ap­pointment; and that it is the greatest vi­olation and pervert­ing of Scripture that can lightly be met with, to affirm, that this is uttered and de­clared by Paul, &c. only because the Jews had perverted it, and reduced it (as they thought) to its primitive intention. And again, p. 44. he saith, he hath pro­ved that it was the same with Adam's Covenant in both re­spects, that is, inten­tionally, as well as materially considered. And once more, p. 20. he expresly de­nies that the Law was added as an Ap­pendix to the Pro­mise; calls that a crude assertion of mine; and asks me, Why it might not be added as an Appen­dix rather to the first Covenant of Works, to re-inforce that? And after all, gush­es out many slight­ing and opprobri­ous terms upon me, which I will not throw back again, but rather leave him to reconcile himself with himself.

I shall only ask Mr. Cary a sober Que­stion or two, instead of Recriminations, and rendring reviling for reviling.

First, How the Iews were right enough in reference to the true nature of the Law, as it was a Covenant of Works, and yet out in respect of its proper use and intention, which was not, that any should attain unto Life and Righteous­ness [Page 195] by it, but to convince them of Sin, and of the necessity of a Saviour; and yet the Law be a Covenant of Works, in­tentionally, as well as materially consider­ed; and that in respect of God's special designation and appointment? If God designed and appointed it in his Sinai dispensation, to be to them an Adam's Co­venant of Works, then certainly they were not out (as you say they were) when they sought Righteousness by the works of it; nor could that mistake of theirs be the ground of the Controversy betwixt the Apostle and them: For it seems it was no mistake, being by God's intention, as well as its own primitive nature, promulged at Sinai, as a true Adam's Covenant.

Secondly, You deny the Law was ad­ded to the Promise, [...] posita, pro apposita, hoc est, Promissio­ni adjecta. Beza. and ask me why it might not be added to the first Cove­nant to re-inforce that? I answer, Be­cause the scope of the place will not bear it, nor any good Expositor countenance such a fancy. You make the Sinai Law to be the same with that first Covenant, and by so expounding the Apostle, you make him say, either that the same thing was added to it self, (which must in your own Phrase, be by a Correspondency [Page 196] of Identity) or else that there are two distinct Covenants of Works (when in­deed there is but one) and that the latter was added to the former. This is your way of Expounding Scripture, when driven to a streight by dint of Argument. Nothing beside such a pure necessity, could drive you upon such an Absur­dity.

It was added to the promise (saith Dr. Reynolds) by way of subserviency and attendance,Vid. Dr. Reynolds, Use of the Law, p. 378. full up to my sense, and p. 371. the better to advance and make effectual the Covenant it self. Mr. Strong upon the two Covenants, saith, the Apostle's meaning is, that the Law was added as an Appendix to the Promise. But it may be you had ra­ther hear Dr. Crisp's ExpositionDr. Crisp, Lib. 4. Serm. 9. than his; for you say, had it been added to the Promise, it would have given life. The Doctor will at once give you the true sense of the Text, and with it a full answer to your Objection. Though Life (saith he) be not the end of the Law, yet there are other sufficient uses of it requiring the promulgation thereof: It was published to be an Appendix to the Gospel▪ Gal. 3. 19. And this sup­poses, (1.) The priority of the Gospel to the Law. (2.) The principality of [Page 197] the Promise of Life by Christ, above the Law. (3.) The Consistence of the Law and Gospel. They may well stand one by another, as an House, and the addition to it may. That it was with such an in­tention added to the Promise, I have met with no Man that had front enough to deny or scruple it before you. And that the Iews did mistake its chief scope and use, from whence we denominate it a Covenant of Grace, the generality of Godly and Learned Divines constantly affirm. See Mr. Anth. Burgess de Lege, p. 227. Bolton's Bounds, p. 160, 161. Mr. Samuel Mather on the Types, p. 11. with multitudes more, whose citations would even weary the Reader. And what you urge from Mr. Poole's Annota­tions, on 2 Cor. 3. 6, 7. it makes no­thing at all to your purpose: For it is manifest the Annotator there, takes the Moral Law in it self, strictly taken, and as set in opposition to the Gospel, which it never was since the Fall, but by the ignorance and infidelity of unregenerate Men.

You also labour to shelter your errone­ous fancy under the authority of Dr. Owen; but you manifestly abuse him in your Citation; for in that very place you re­fer [Page 198] to, he speaks strictly of the Covenant of Works made with Adam in Paradise; and plainly distinguishes it from the Si­nai Covenant, which sufficiently shews his judgment in this point. For these are his own words, which you suppres­sed in the Citation,Dr. Owen of Iustifica­tion, p. 396, 397. Vindi­cated from Mr. C's gross Misre­presenta­tions As to the Sinai Covenant and the New Testament, with their privileges thence emerging, they belong not to our present Argument. This Paragraph you wilfully omit, that you might include that which his words plainly exclude. In the same place he tells you, that David and Abraham's Co­venant, was for essence the Covenant of Grace, notwithstanding the variations made in it: But you take and leave, as best suits your design [...]ut if you will see the Doctor's judgment, in concurrence with all his Brethren, you have it in these very words: Although this Covenant hath been variously admi­nistred in respect of Ordinances and Institutions in the time of the Law, and since the coming of Christ in the flesh; yet for the sub­stance and efficacy of it, to all its spiritual and saving ends, it is one and the same; upon the account of which various dispensations it is called the Old and New-Testament.’ Vide Declaration of the Faith and Order of the Congregational Churches in England, p. 15. at the Savoy, Octob. 12. 1658..

Once more in p. 16, 17, &c. of my Vindiciae Legis, you find your self pinch­ed with another Dilemma, from Lev. 26. 40, 41, 46. whence I plainly proved, [Page 199] That there is a Promise of Pardon found in the Sinai dispensation, to penitent sinners. That this Promise was given at Mount Sinai by the hand of Moses, is undeniable from vers. 46. That it con­tained the Relief of a gracious remission to penitent sinners, is as undeniable from vers. 40, 41. If you say, this Promise belongs to Moses his dispensation (as verse 46. tells you it did) then there is remission of Sins found in the Sinai Laws. If you say, it only refers to Abraham's Covenant of Grace; then that Covenant of Grace appears to be conditional, which you utterly deny.

Now what is your Reply to this? (1.) You object my own words in the Method of Grace, p. 326. as if you had never read the just and fair Vindication I had before given you of them, p. 134, 135. of my first Reply to you. At this rate Men may continue Controversies to the Worlds end. Sir, there are many Witnesses, that you are very well ac­quainted with my Method of Grace. (2.) You say, p. 31. of your Reply, That that Covenant could not be condi­tional, because a Condition implies merit either of congruity or condignity. This is a further discovery of your ignorance of [Page 200] the nature of Conditions, as well▪ as Co­venants: But that Point belonging to the last Head of Controversy between us, I shall refer it thither.

It were easie for me to instance in many more Absurdities which Mr. C. cannot eluctate, and to prove them upon him as easily as to name them. But I will not press him too far; what hath been named and proved already, is more than enough to convince the Reader, that my first Argument is left standing in its full force and strength against him, viz.

Argument I.

That Proposition can never be true, which necessarily draws many and horrid gross absurdities after it by just conse­quence. But so doth this: Ergo.

Argument II.

My next Argument, Vindiciae, &c. p. 27. is as secure as the first. It was this. If Adam's Covenant had one end, name­ly, the Happiness and Justification of Men by their own Obedience, and the Law at Sinai had quite another end, namely to bring Sinners to Christ by Faith for their Righteousness; the one [Page 201] to keep him within himself, the other to take him quite out of himself; then the Sinai Law cannot possibly be the same with Adam's Covenant of Works in Pa­radise.

But so stands the Case, Rom. 10. 4. Christ is the end of the Law for righteous­ness to every one that believeth.

Therefore they cannot be the same, but two different Covenants.

All that touches this Argument, is but three Lines in the 49th page of your Re­ply; where you say you have sufficient­ly answered and cleared this in p. 169, 172. of your former Discourse, from the corrupt interpretation by me fastened thereon.

Now, if the Reader will give himself the trouble to examine those Pages, he shall find that Mr. C. there allows that very interpretation which he here calls corrupt; and saith it comes all to one reckoning with his own. If this will overthrow my second Argument, it is gone.

Argument III.

My third Argument was drawn from Acts 7. 38. in this Form:

[Page 202] If Christ himself were the Angel by whom the Laws were delivered to Moses, which are there called the lively Oracles of God; then the Law cannot be a pure Adam [...]s Covenant of Works: For it is never to be imagined, that ever Jesus Christ himself should deliver to Moses such a Covenant directly opposite to all the ends of his future Incarnation.

But it is more than probable from that Text, that it was Christ which delivered the Law to Moses on the Mount. Ergo.

To this Argument he saith not one word in p. 49. of his Reply, where he cites a part of it, nibling a little at that expression [The lively Oracles of God], thinking it unimaginable the Sinai Law should be such; when as the Apostle Paul, Rom. 7. 10. found the Command­ment to be unto death; and the Apostle 2 Cor. 3. 6, 7. calls it a Ministration of death. I must therefore leave Mr. C. to reconcile those two Scriptures. And withal,Fr. Span­hem. E­lench. Contro­vers. p. 552. I must tell him, that Spanhemius gives the same sense I do of Acts 7. 38. as the current judgment of Christians against the Iews, That it was not a crea­ted Angel, but Christ himself.

Argument IV.

The last Argument I urged, was from Rom. 9. 4. and thus it may run.

No such Covenant as by the Fall had utterly lost all its Promises, Privileges, and Blessings, and could retain nothing but Curses and Punishments, could pos­sibly be numbred among the chief Pri­vileges in which God's Israel gloried.

But the Law given at Sinai was num­bred among their chief privileges, Rom. 9. 4. Ergo.

To this he only saith, p. 57. of his Reply, ‘That the Law, even as it was a Covenant of Works, was a privi­lege inestimable, beyond what all others enjoyed; because the very Curses and Punishments annexed thereunto, in case of the least faileur, were of ex­cellent use to convince them of their sin and misery without Christ, and their necessity therefore of a Saviour; which was the proper work of the Law, as a Covenant of works; which advantage all other Nations wanting, it might well be numbred among the chief Privileges they were invested with.’

[Page 204] But (1.) If the Law were intended by God, to be an Adam's Covenant to them (as Mr. C. saith it was) where then is the Privilege of God's Israel a­bove other Nations? (2.) If their Pri­vilege consisted in the subserviency of that Law to Christ (as he here intimates it did) then he yields the thing I con­tend for. For this being its chief scope and end, we do hence justly denominate it a Covenant of Grace, though more obscure and legally administred. And in this judgment most of our solid Divines concur. Mr. Charnock on the Attributes, p. 390. is clear and judicious in the point.Bolton's Bounds, p. 130, &c. Mr. Samuel Bolton, in that ex­cellent Book called, The Bounds of Chri­stian Liberty, gives nine solid Arguments to prove the Law was not set up at Sinai as a Covenant of Works.Burgess, de Lege, p. 225. Greenhill, in Loc. Mr. Anth. Burgess gives us six Arguments to prove the same Conclusion. Mr. Greenhill on Ezek. 16. gives us demonstration from that Context, That since it was a Mar­riage-Covenant, as it appears to be v. 8. it cannot possibly be a distinct Covenant from the Covenant of Grace. The incom­parable Turrettine Learnedly and Judici­ously states this Controversy;Turret­tine, part 2. p. 288, 289. and both positively asserts, and by many Argu­ments [Page 205] fully proves, That the Sinai Law cannot be a pure Covenant of Works, or a Covenant specifically distinct from the Covenant of Grace. It were easie to fill Pages with Allegations of this kind; but I hope what hath been said, may suf­fice for this Point.

But still Mr. Cary complains, that I have all this while but threatned his Ar­guments to prove them fallacious, or to have four Terms in them; and therefore he hath drawn out some select Arguments, as he calls them, p. 37. to try my skill upon. I will neither tire my Reader in a foolish chase of such weak and imper­tinent Arguments as he there produceth, nor yet wholly neglect them, lest he glory in them as unanswerable. And therefore to shew him the fate of the rest, I will only touch his first Argument, which being his Argumentum Palmarium, deservedly leads the Van to all the rest. And thus it runs upon all four.

That Covenant that is not of Faith, must needs be a Covenant of Works, yea, the very same for substance with that made with Adam.

But the Scripture is express, That the Law is not of Faith, Gal. 3. 12. Ergo.

[Page 206] The Law is considered two ways in Scripture.Reply. (1.) Largely, for the whole Mosaical Oeconomy, comprehensive of the Ceremonial as well as Moral Pre­cepts; and that Law is of Faith, as the Learned Turrettine hath proved by four Scripture Arguments, Pars secunda, p. 292, 293.Lex dicitur non esse ex fide, Gal. 3. 12. non ut latè sumitur prout notat Oeconomiam Mosaicam; sed strictè, quum sumitur pro Lege Morali abstracte, & seorsim à promissionibus gratiae, quomodo illam in­telligebant Justiciarii, qui vitam ex eâ quaerebant. Nam fidem etiam in foe­dere Sinaitico praeceptam fuisse evincitur, &c. Be­cause it contained Christ the Object of Faith, &c. Because it impelled men to seek Christ by Faith. Be­cause it required that God be worshipped, which he cannot rightly be without Faith. And because Paul describes the Righteousness of Faith in those very words whereby Moses had declared the Precepts of the Law, Deut. 30. 11, 12, 13. Again, the Law in Scripture is taken strictly for the Moral Law only, considered abstractly from the promises of Grace, as the Le­gal Iusticiaries understood it. These are two far different senses and acceptations of the Law. Your Major Proposition takes the Law in its large complex body, as appears by your 3d page. Your Mi­nor Proposition, which you would con­firm by Gal. 3. 12. takes the Law strict­ly [Page 207] and abstractly, as it is set disjunctly from, yea in opposition to Faith and the Promises, and so there are two sorts of Law in your Argument, and consequently your Argument is fallacious, as all its fel­lows be, and runs (as I told you before) upon all four.

I hope this may suffice with respect to the Sinai Covenant controverted betwixt me and my Neighbour, to evince that it cannot be what he asserts it to be, even an Adam's Covenant of Works: and that I have discharged what I undertook to prove with respect to this Covenant, namely, That Mr. C. cannot free his Po­sition from the gross Absurdities with which I loaded it, but endeavouring to do that, hath incurred many more: that his Reply hath left my Arguments stand­ing in their full strength against him: and that the Position I have set up against him, is well founded in Scripture; and hath the general concurrence and consent of Learned, Holy and Orthodox Divines.

To conclude, Let the grave and learn­ed Dr. Edw. Reynolds, in his excellent Treatise of the Vse of the Law, deter­mine this Controversy betwixt us, p. 371, &c. where designedly handling this Do­ctrine from Rom. 7. 13. That the Law [Page 208] was revived and promulgated anew on Mount Sinai by the Ministry of Moses, with no other than Evangelical and mer­ciful purposes, he abundantly confirms my Sense and Arguments, and saves me the labour of refuting the principal, and most of yours: where carrying before him the whole Context of Gal. 3. from the 15th to the 23d, he clearly carries his Doctrine with it, proving from v. 15. ‘That God's Covenant with Abraham was perpetual and immutable, and therefore all other subsequent Acts of God (such as the giving of the Law was) do some way or other refer unto it. (2.) From v. 16.P. 376. he further proves, That as God's Covenant with Abra­ham is most constant in regard of the wisdom and unvariableness of him that made it; so it can never expire for want of a Seed to whom it is made.P. 377. (3.) From v. 17. he proves, that if another Law be made after the Promise, which pri­ma specie, and in strict construction, doth imply a contradiction to the terms and nature of the former Law; then it is certain, that this latter Law must be understood in some other sense, and admit of some other subordinate use, which may well consist with the being [Page 209] and force of the former Covenant. (4.) From v. 18. he proves, that the com­ing of the Law hath not voided the Pro­mise, and that the Law is not of force (as you vainly dream) towards the Seed to whom the Promise is made; and there­fore if it be not to stand in a contradi­ction, it follows that it must stand in subordination to the Gospel; and so to tend to Evangelical Purposes.’ (5.) He further proves his Conclusion from v. 19. which shews for what end the Law was added, [...]. ‘It was not (saith he) set up alone, as a thing in gross by it self; as an adequate, compleat, solid Rule of Righteousness, as it was given to Adam in Paradise: much less was it published to void and disannul any precedent Covenant; but so far was it from abrogating, that it was added to the Promise by way of subser­viency, and attendance; the better to advance and make effectual the Cove­nant it self; and that until the Seed should come, which whether it respect Christ personal, or mystical; in either sense (saith he) it confirms the point we are upon, viz. That the Law hath Evangelical purposes. If the Seed be understood of the Person of Christ, [Page 210] then this shews that the Law was put to the Promise, the better to raise and stir up in men the expectations of Christ, the promised Seed. But if we understand by Seed, the Faithful (which I rather approve);P. 379. then the A­postle's meaning is this; That as long as any are either to come into the uni­ty of Christ's Body, and have the Co­venant of Grace applied to them, &c. so long there will be use of the Law, both to the Unregenerate, to make them [...]ly to Christ, and those that are already called, that they may learn to cast all their faith, hope, and expecta­tion of Righteousness upon him still. This then manifestly shews,P. 380. that there was no other intention in publishing the Law, but with reference to the Seed: that is, with Evangelical pur­poses to shew mercy: not with refe­rence to those that perish, who would have had condemnation enough with­out the Law.’ And further strengthens his Conclusion from the last words of vers. 19. ‘That it was ordained by An­gels in the hand of a Mediator. This (saith he) evidently declares, That the Law was published in mercy and pa­cification, not in fury or revenge; [Page 211] (for the work of a Mediator is to nego­tiate peace, and treat of reconcilement between Parties offended) whereas, if the Lord had intended death in the publishing of the Law, he would not have proclaimed it in the hand of a Mediator, but of an Executioner. (6.) From vers. 20.P. 381▪ Those words (saith he) shew why the Law was published in the hand of a Mediator, viz. that they should not despair and sink under the fear of his Wrath. For as he made a Covenant of Promise to Abraham, and his Seed; so he is the same God still, one in his grace and mercy towards Sinners. God is one, i. e. in sending this Mediator, he doth declare to Mankind, that he is at peace and unity with them again. Moses was the Representative, and Christ the substantial and real Mediator. God is one, i. e. P. 382. he carries the same purpose and intention both in the Law and in the Gospel;P. 384. namely, benevo­lence, and desire of reconcilement with men. (7.) To sum up all that hath been spoken touching the use of the Law in a plain similitude; Suppose we a Prince should proclaim a Pardon to all Traitors, if they would come in [Page 212] and plead it; and after this, should send forth his Officers to attach, imprison, examine, convince, arraign, threaten and condemn them: is he now contra­ry to himself? hath he repented of his Mercy? No, but he is unwilling to lose his Mercy, desirous to have the honour of his Mercy acknowledged unto him. The same is the Case be­tween God and us. To Abraham he made a promise of Mercy and Blessed­ness to all that would plead interest in it, for the remission of their Sins; but men were secure and heedless of their Estate,P. 385. &c. Hereupon the Lord pub­lished by Moses a severe and terrible Law; yet in all this, God doth but pursue his first purpose of mercy, and take a course to make his Gospel ac­counted worthy of all acceptation; which clears the general point, That God in the publication of the Law by Moses on Mount Sinai, had none but Merciful and Evangelical Intentions. And once more; The Law was not published by Moses on Mount Sinai, as it was given to Adam in Paradise, P. 386. to justify, or to save men. And p. 385. it is not given, ex primari [...] intentione, to condemn men. In consequence to [Page 213] all which he saith, p. 388, 389. that to preach the Law alone by it self, is to pervert the use of it; neither have we any power or commission so to do. It was published as an Appendant to the Gospel, and so must it be preached. It was published in the hand of a Me­diator, and must be preached in the hand of a Mediator. It was published Evangelically, and it must be so preached.’

See how this agrees now with p. 173. of your Call, and how the several parts of the discourse of this sound and emi­nent Doctor (which I have been forced to sum up and contract) do abundantly confute your vain Notions of the Law, and cut the very nerves of your best Ar­guments, if they had any nerves in them: for indeed it is moles absque nervis:

It were easy for me to represent the Sense of many other eminent Divines in perfect harmony with the Doctrine of this great and excellent Divine, who hath substantially proved the Point I defend against you: but 'tis enough.

II. Let us next examine what execu­tion his Reply hath done upon my second Position, set up in direct opposition to him; namely, That God's Covenant with [Page 214] Abraham,Abraham's Covenant, Gen. 17. the Cove­nant of Grace. Gen. 17. unto which Circumci­sion was annexed, is, for its substance, the self-same Covenant of Grace with that which Gentile-believers and their Infant-seed are now under.

Here I have abundant cause again to complain, that Mr. C. hath so formed his Answers, as if he had never read the Book he undertakes a Reply to. And I do verily believe, the greatest part of his Reply was made at random, before ever my printed Book was in his hands. For he hath not at all considered the state of the Question as I there gave it him; nor kept himself to the just and necessary Rules of Disputation, as I earnestly de­sired he would. However, 'tis not Com­plaints, but confirmation and vindication of my Arguments, which is my proper work. I shall therefore recite them briefly, and vindicate and confirm them strongly; contracting all into as few words as can express the sense and Argu­ment of the Point before me.

Argument I.

If Circumcision be a part of the Cere­monial Law, and the Ceremonial Law was dedicated by Blood; and whatsoever is so dedicated, is by you confessed to be [Page 215] no part of the Covenant of Works:Vindiciae Legis, &c. p. 42. then Circumcision can be no part of the Co­venant of Works, even by your own confession. But it is so. Ergo.

To this Mr.Reply. P. 68. Cary returns a Tragical Complaint instead of a Rational Answer. Insinuates my falsehood and gross abuse of him. Appeals to his Reader. Tells him I have taken a liberty to say what I please, as if there were no future Iudgment to be regarded. And that I can expect no com­fort another day without repentance now. For those things that have thus passed be­twixt him and me, shall again be revised, and set in order before me. That he is weary of noting my Miscarriages of this kind. That there is hardly a Page or Pa­ragraph in my whole Reply, but abounds with Transgressions of this nature. He begs the Lord to forgive me; and wishes he could say, Father, forgive him, for he knows not what he doth; as if my Sin were greater than the Sin of those that stoned Stephen, or crucified Christ.

Either I am guilty or innocent in the matters here charged upon me by Mr. C. If guilty, Reply. I promise him an ingenuous acknowledgment. If innocent, (as both my Conscience, and his own Book will prove me to be) then I shall only say, he [Page 216] knoweth not what spirit he is of. The Case must be tried by his own Book, and it will quickly be decided. These are the very words in his Solemn Call, p. 148. He (that is, Mr. Sedgwick) makes no distinction betwixt the Ceremonial Cove­nant that was dedicated with blood, and the Law written in stones that was not so dedicated. How strangely doth he confound and obscure the word and truth of God, which ought to have been cleared and distinctly declared to those he had preached or written to? With much more, p. 149, 150, 151. where he saith, It's plain, that the Law written in Stones, and the Book wherein the Statutes and Iudgments were contained, were two di­stinct Covenants, and delivered at di­stinct seasons, and in a distinct method; the one with, the other without a Media­tor; the one dedicated with blood and sprinkling, the other (that we read of) not so dedicated.

Now let the Reader judge whether I have deserved such Tragical Complaints and dreadful Charges for inferring from these words, That the Ceremonial Law being by him pronounced a distinct Co­venant from the Moral Law, which he makes all one with Adam's Covenant; [Page 217] delivered at a distinct season, and in a di­stinct method; the Ceremonial Law with a Mediator, the Moral Law without a Mediator; the Ceremonial Law dedi­cated with blood and sprinkling, the Mo­ral Law not so dedicated: let him judge (I say) whether I have wronged him in saying, that by his own confession, Cir­cumcision being a part of this Ceremo­nial Law, it can therefore be no part of the Covenant of Works?

But Mr. Cary hath two things to say for himself.Exception. (1.) That in the same place he makes the Ceremonial Law no other than a Covenant of Works: And the wrong I have done him, is by not distin­guishing (as he did) betwixt A Covenant of Works, and The Covenant of Works. Here it seems lies my guilt upon which this dreadful out-cry against me is made.

But if I should chance to prove,Reply. that there never was, is, or can be any more than one Covenant of Works; and that any other Covenant which is distinguish­ed from it (as he confesses the Ceremo­nial Law was) by a Mediator, and the blood of sprinkling, can be no part of that Covenant of Works: what then will become of Mr. C's distinction of A Covenant of Works, and The Covenant of [Page 218] Works? Now the matter is plain and evident, That as there never were, are, or can be more than two common Heads appointed by God, namely Adam, and Christ, 1 Cor. 15. 45, 46, 47, 48. Rom. 5. 15, 17, 18, 19. so it is impossible there should be more than two Covenants, un­der which Mankind stands, under these two common Heads. And the First Co­venant once broken, it is utterly impos­sible that fallen Man should ever attain life that way, or that ever God should set it up again with such an intention and scope,Charnock on the At­tributes, p. 390. unless (as Mr. Charnock speaks) he had reduced man's Body to the dust, and his Soul to nothing, and framed another man to have governed him by a Covenant of Works; but that had not been the same man that had revolted, and upon his revolt was stained and disabled. If Mr. C. there­fore be not able to prove more Covenants of Works with Mankind than one, let him rather blush at his silly distinction betwixt a [...] Covenant of Works, and the Covenant of Works. For indeed he makes at least four distinct Covenants of Works, one with Adam, two with Moses; one Moral, the other Ceremonial; and a fourth with Abraham at the institu­tion of Circumcision, Gen. 17.

[Page 219] (2.) If it appear (as it clearly doth) that as there never was, is, or can be any more than one Covenant of Works, so whatsoever Covenant is distinguished from it by a Mediator, and dedication by the sprinkling of blood (as he saith the Ceremonial Law was) cannot possibly, for the Reasons he gives, be any part or member of Adam's Covenant of Works; then, I hope, I have done M. C. no wrong in my assumption from his own words, for which he so reviles and abuses me. But this will appear as plain as the Noon-day-light: for a Covenant with a Mediator, and dedicated by sprinkling of blood, doth, and necessarily must essen­tially difference such a Covenant from that Covenant that had no Mediator, nor dedication by blood. To deny this, were to confound Law and Gospel, Adam's and Christ's Covenant; but the distin­ction betwixt them is his own, therefore my assumption was just. That this blood was typically the blood of Christ, and that the Holy Ghost signified the one by the other, is plain from Heb. 9. 7, 8. And I never met with that man that scrupled it before Mr. Cary. So then my first Argument to prove Abraham's Cove­nant of Circumcision to be the Covenant [Page 220] of Grace, and not an Adam's Covenant, or any part thereof, stands firm after Mr. C's passionate Reply, which I hope the Lord will pardon to him, though he had scarce Charity enough left to desire a pardon for his Friend, who had neither wronged the Truth, nor him.

Argument II.

My second Argument was this. If Circumcision was the seal of the Righte­ousness of Faith, it did not pertain to the Covenant of Works; for the Righteous­ness of Faith and Works are opposite.

But Circumcision was the Seal of the Righteousness of Faith, Rom. 4. 11. Ergo.

The sum of what he answers to this, p. 72, 73, &c. (as far as I can pick his true sense out of a multitude of needless words) is this. He confesses this Argu­ment seems very plausible; but however, Abraham was a Believer before Circum­cision; and tho indeed it sealed the Righ­teousness of Faith to him, yet it sealed it to him only as the Father of Believers: and denies that ever Jacob, or Isaac, or any other enrolled in that Covenant, were sealed by it; but to all the rest beside A­braham, it was rather a token of servi­tude [Page 221] and bondage. This is the sum and substance of his Reply.

But,Reply. Sir, let me ask you two or three plain Questions. (1.) What is the reason you silently slide over the Question I asked you, p. 41. of my Vindiciae, &c? Did you find it an hot Iron, which you durst not touch? 'Tis like you did. My Question was this. Had Adam's Covenant a seal of the righteousness of faith annexed to it, as this had, Rom. 4. 11? The righteousness of faith is evangelical righteousness, and this Circumcision sealed. Say not it was to Abraham only that it sealed it, for 'tis an injurious restriction put upon the Seal of a Covenant which extended to the Fathers, as well as to Abraham: how­ever, you admit that it sealed evangelical righteousness to Abraham: but I hope you will not say, that a Seal of the Covenant of Works (for so you make Circumcision to be) ever did, or could seal evangelical righte­ousness to any individual person in the World.

I find you a man of great confidence, but certainly here it failed you: not one word in Reply to this. ‘(2.) I told you your distinction was invented by Bellarmine, and shew'd you where it was confuted by Dr. Ames: but not a [Page 222] word to that. (3.) I show'd, That the extending of that Seal to all Be­lievers as well as Abraham, is most agreeable to the drift and scope of the Apostle's Argument, which is to prove, that both Iews and Gentiles are justified by Faith, as Abraham was: and that the ground of [...]ustification is common to both: and that how great soever Abraham was, yet in this case he hath found nothing whereof to glory. And is not your Exposition a notable one, to prove the community of the privi­ledge of Justification, because the Seal of it was peculiar to Abraham alone? p. 47, 48.

Sir, You have spent words enough upon this Head to tire your Reader. But why can I not meet with one word a­mong them, that fairly advances to grap­ple with my Argument? or answer the important Questions before you, upon which the matter depends? If this be all you have to say, I must tell you, You are a weak manager of a bad Cause; which is the less hazard to Truth.

Argument III.

In the Covenant of Circumcision, Gen. 17. God makes over himself to A­braham, [Page 223] and his Seed, to be their God, or gives them a special interest in himself.

But in the Covenant of Works, God doth not since the Fall, make over himself to any to be their God by way of special interest.

Therefore the Covenant of Circumci­sion cannot be the Covenant of Works.

The sum of your Reply in p. 76. is under two Heads.

(1.) ‘You boldly tell me, That God doth in the Covenant of Works make over himself to Sinners to be their God by way of special interest: but it being upon such hard terms, that it's utterly impossible for Sinners that way to attain unto life, he hath therefore been pleased to abolish that, and make a new Covenant: and bring Exod. 20. 2. to prove it.

This is new and strange Divinity with me.Reply. (1.) That God should become a People's God by way of special interest, by vertue of the broken Covenant of Works. This wholly alters the nature of that Covenant; for then it was a Law that could give life, contrary to Gal. 3. 21. unless you can suppose a Soul that's total­ly dead in Sin, to have a special interest in God, as his God. (2.) This Answer of yours yields the Controversy about the [Page 224] nature of the Sinai Law: for this very Concession of yours, is the Medium by which our Divines prove it to be a Cove­nant of Grace. (3.) This Concession of yours confounds the two Covenants, by communicating the essential property and prime privilege of the Covenant of Grace; to Adam's Covenant of Works. Either therefore expunge Ier. 31. 33. as a Covenant of Grace, I will be their God, and they shall be my people; or allow that in Gen. 17. 7. to be specifically the same; and that Exod. 20. though more obscure­ly delivered. (4.) ‘You assert, That God may actually become a Peoples God by way of special interest, and yet the salvation of that People be suspended upon impossible terms. You sent them before to Purgatory, but by this you must send them directly to Hell: for if the salvation of God's peculiar Peo­ple be upon impossible terms, 'tis cer­tain they cannot be saved. And last­ly, It is an horrid reflection upon the Wisdom and Goodness of God, who ne­ver did, or will make any Covenant, wherein he takes fallen Men to be his pe­culiar People, and make over himself to be their God; and yet not make provi­sion for their Salvation in the same Cove­nant, [Page 225] but leave their Salvation for many Ages upon hard and impossible terms, (i. e.) leave them under damnation.

(2.) I told you in my Vindiciae, &c. p. 49. that you were fain to cut Abra­ham's Covenant, Gen. 17. into two parts; and make the first to be the pure Cove­nant of Grace, which is the promisory part to the 9th verse; and the Restipula­tion (as you call it, p. 205.) to be as pure a Covenant of Works. Which I truly said was a bold Action; and in so calling it, I gave it a softer name than the nature of it deserved.

The sum of what you reply to this,Mr. C's Defence, p. 79. is, (1.) By denying the matter of fact, and charging me with misrepresentation; and in the next page confessing the whole Charge, saying, Though the Promise and the Restipulation, mentioned vers. 7, 8, 9. make but one and the same Cove­nant of Circumcision; yet there are two Covenants mentioned in that Context, the first between God and Abraham him­self, vers. 2, 4. the other between God and Abraham, and his natural Posterity also, vers. 7, 8, 9, 10. The former you call a Covenant of Grace, the latter a Covenant of Works. And p. 81. you affirm, That after God had entred the [Page 226] Covenant of Grace with Abraham, v. 2, 4. that Abraham himself was required to be circumcised by the Command of God, as a Token of the Covenant of Works. And thenP. 81. (after some unbecoming Scoffs for misplacing vers. 7, 8. where vers. 9, 10. should be; as also of Gen. 12. for Gen. 17. (whether by the Scribe, my Self, or Press, I cannot say; but in each place sufficient light is given to set you right in the scope and Argument of my Discourse) you tell us, That how harsh and unlikely soever it may seem to man's carnal reason, that the latter, to wit, the Covenant of Works made with Abraham, vers. 9, 10. must needs make void the Covenant of Grace made with him, vers. 2, 4. yet the Apostle gives a quite contrary resolution of it, Gal. 3. 17. And after all, p. 79. in return to my Argument, That the Circumcision of Abraham, and his Seed, vers. 9, 10. could not possibly be a condition of A­dam's Covenant of Works from the nature of the act: because Paul himself circumci­sed Timothy, Act. 16. 1, 2, 3. and asserts it to be a part of his Liberty, Gal. 2. 3. 4. which could never be, if in the very nature of the act it had bound Timothy to keep the Law for justification; and had been con­trary to the whole scope of the Apostle's [Page 227] Doctrine: but it became an obligation only from the intention of the Agent. All that you say to this, p. 95. is, ‘That as for Paul's compliance with the Iews, however the case stood in that respect, this is certain, That the blessed Apostle would never have expressed himself with that vehemency he doth, Gal. 5. 2, 3. if this had been only the sense of the Iewish Teachers, or that Circumcision in its own nature did not oblige to the keep­ing of the whole Law; and that this is only my corrupt gloss upon the Text.

If there be but one Covenant made betwixt God and Abraham in that 17th of Genesis, Reply. and you make two, not only numerically, but specifically distinct, yea, opposite Covenants of it; then you bold­ly cut God's Covenant with Abraham in two, and are guilty of an insufferable abuse of the Covenant of God. But the former is true: therefore so is the latter. You say, p. 223, 224. of your Call, ‘That at the second and fourth Verses God made a Covenant with Abraham himself alone; but at verse 7. he makes the Covenant of Circumcision betwixt himself and Abraham, and his natural Seed also; and saith, vers. 7. And, or (according to the old Translation) [Page 228] Moreover; as proceeding to speak of another Covenant than what he had been before insisting on.’

Now I would soberly ask, (1.) What Vouchers you have amongst Expositors for this your rash and daring Assertion? I find not a man that hath trod this path before you, and I hope none will be hardy enough to follow. You certainly stand alone, and 'tis pity but you should. (2.) Where do you find the just parts of the New Covenant in the 2d and 4th verse? Is it not altogether promisory on God's part, without any restipulation on Abraham's? for you have excluded v. 1, 9, 10. from that which you call God's Covenant of Grace with him. And then for your Covenant of Works, vers. 7, 8, 9, 10. you make this to be the Promiso­ry part of that Covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy Seed after thee; and again vers. 8. I will be their God. Was ever such a Promise as this, found in a Cove­nant of Works? Tell me what-ever God said more in the New Covenant, than he saith here? Oh blessed Covenant of Works, if this be such! (3.) Tell me whether you can satisfy your own Con­science with the Answers you have given to my first Argument against your para­doxical, [Page 229] yea heterodoxical Exposition? I told you, That if vers. 7, 8, 9, 10. con­tain another Covenant, viz. of Works, entred by God with Abraham and his Seed, it must needs make void the former Covenant, vers. 2, 4. for where-ever the Covenant of Works takes place, the Co-Covenant of Grace gives place; they cannot consist, as I have abundantly pro­ved before. Do you verily think those words of the Apostle, Gal. 3. 17. which you bring as a foundation to support your singular and sinful Exposition, viz. And this I say, That the Covenant that was con­firmed before of God in Christ, the Law, which was four hundred and thirty years af­ter, cannot disannul that it should make the Promise of none effect; do you think (I say) that in that, or any other Text, the Apostle opposes the two Covenants made (as you fancy) with Abraham, Gen. 17? or doth he not there speak of God's Co­venant with Abraham, as distinguished from the Law made 430. years after­ward? (4.) Have you satisfied your own Judgment and Conscience in the Reply you make to that unanswerable Objection from Paul's circumcising of Timothy, Acts 16. 2, 3. where you have the plain matter of fact before you, that he was [Page 230] circumcised by Paul; and this Fact of his, justified as a part of the Liberty he had in Christ, Gal. 2. 3, 4. from whence it evidently ap­pears,Teneter non simpli [...]itèr & absolutè ex genere ope­ris, sed ex intentione ope­rantis, & suppositâ tali opinione, &c. Poole in loc. That Circumcision in its own nature did not simply and absolutely ob­lige men to the keeping of Moses his Law for Righteousness, but only from the intention or opinion of the Person. And though you call this my corrupt gloss upon the Text, therein you grosly abuse me. The gloss is nei­ther corrupt, nor my own; but the una­nimous Judgment of all sound Expositors of the Text, as you might see, were you capable of seeing it, in a Collection of their Judgments upon that Text, Gal. 5. 2, 3. in Mr. Poole's Synopsis. And tho Estius thinks the Act of Circumcision might be obligatory to the Gentiles, to whom the Law was not given; yet it was not so to the Iews that believed, and such was Timothy. But why do I refer you to the Judgment of Commentators? the very reason of it may convince you: For,

If the very Act of Circumcision did in its own nature oblige all on whom it passed, to keep the whole Law for their [Page 231] Righteousness, then Paul so obliged Ti­mothy, and all others on whom he passed it, to keep the Law for their Righteous­ness.

But Paul did not oblige Timothy, or any other on whom he passed it, by the very Act of Circumcision so to keep the Law.

Therefore the very Act of Circumci­sion in its own nature did not oblige all on whom it passed, to keep the whole Law for Righteousness.

You may ponder this Argument at your leisure, and not think to refute it at so cheap a rate, as by calling it a corrupt gloss of my own. And thus I hope I have sufficiently fortified and confirmed my Third Argument, to prove Abraham's Covenant to be a Covenant of Grace. My Fourth was this.

Argument IV.

That which in its direct and primary end teacheth Man the corruption of his Nature by sin, and the mortification of sin by the Spirit of Christ, cannot be a condition of the Covenant of Works.

But so did Circumcision in the very di­rect and primary end of it. Therefore, &c.

[Page 232] Your Reply to this is, That when I have substantially proved that the Sinai Covenant, as it contained the Passeover, Sacrifices, Types and Appendages, under which were vailed many spiritual Myste­ries relating to Christ, and mortification of sin by his Grace and Spirit, to be no Co­venant of Works, but a Gospel-covenant; you will then grant with me, that the pre­sent Argument is convincing; p. 96, 97. of your Reply.

Sir,Reply. I take you for an honest man: and every honest man will be as good as his word. Either I have fully proved against you, that the Sinai Law (taken in that latitude you here express it) is not an Adam's Covenant of Works, or I have not. If I have not, doubtless you have reserved your more pertinent and strong Replies in your own breast, and trust not to those weak and silly ones which you see here baffled, and have on­ly served to involve you in greater Ab­surdities than before. But if you have brought forth all your strength (as in such a desperate strait no man can ima­gine but you would) then I have fully proved the point against you. And if I have, I expect you to be ingenuous and candid in making good your word, That [Page 233] you will then grant with me, that this Argument is convincing to the end for which it was designed. And so I hope we have fully issued the Controversy be­tween us, relating to God's Covenant with Abraham. You have indeed four Arguments, p. 59, 60, 61, 62. of your Reply, to prove Abraham's Covenant a Covenant of Works of the same nature with Adam's Covenant.

(1.) Because as life was implicitly pro­mised to Adam upon his obedience, and death explicitly threatned in case of his disobedience, which made that properly a Covenant of Works; so it was in the Covenant of Circumcision, Gen. 17. 7, 8. compared with vers. 10, 14.

This Argument or Reason can never conclude:Reply. because as God never requi­red of Abraham, and his Children, per­sonal, perfect, and perpetual obedience to the whole Law for life, as he did of Adam; so the death, or cutting off, spo­ken of here, seems to be another thing from that threatned to Adam. Circum­cision (as I told you before) was appoint­ed to be the discriminating Sign betwixt Abraham's Seed, and the Heathen World: and the wilful neglect thereof is here threatned with cutting off by Civil or [Page 234] Ecclesiastical Excommunication from the Commonwealth, and Church of Is­rael, as Luther, Calvin, Paraeus, Muscu­lus, &c. expounds; not by death of Body and Soul, as was threatned to Adam, without place for repentance, or hope of mercy.

(2.) You say Abraham's Covenant could not be a Covenant of Faith, be­cause Faith was not reckoned to Abra­ham for Righteousness in Circumcision, but in Uncircumcision, Rom. 4. 9, 10.

This is weak reasoning.Reply. Circumcision could not belong to a Gospel-covenant, because Abraham was a Believer before he was circumcised. You may as well de­ny the Lord's Supper to be the Seal of a Gospel-Covenant, because the Partakers of it are Believers before they partake of it. Beside, you cannot deny but it sealed the Righteousness of [...]aith to Abraham: and I desired you before, to prove that a Seal of the Covenant of Works i [...] capable of being applied to such an use and ser­vice, which you have not done, nor ever will be able to do; but politickly slided by it.

(3.) You say it cannot be a Covenant of Grace, because it is contra-distinguish­ed to the Righteousness of Faith, Rom. 4. 13.

[Page 235] The Law in that place is put strictly for the pure Law of Nature,Reply. and Meta­leptically signifies the Works of the Law, which is a far different thing from the Law taken in that latitude wherein you take it. And is not this a pretty Argu­ment, that because the promise to Abra­ham, and his Seed, was not through the Law, but through the Righteousness of Faith; therefore the Covenant of God made with Abraham, and his Seed, Gen. 17. cannot be a gracious, but a legal Covenant? This Promise mentioned Rom. 4. 13. was made to Abraham long before the Law was given by Moses: and Free-grace, not Abraham's legal Righte­ousness, was the impulsive cause moving God to make that Promise to Abraham, and to his Seed: and their enjoyment of the Mercies promised, was not to be through the Law, but through the Righteousness of Faith. By what rule of art this Scripture is alledged to prove God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. to be a Covenant of Works, I am utterly to seek. If it be only because Circumci­sion was added to it, that's answered over and over before; and you neither have, nor can reply to it.

[Page 236] (4.) Lastly, It cannot (say you) be a Covenant of Grace, because it's repre­sented to us in Scripture as a Bondage-covenant, Acts 15. 10, &c. Gal. 5. 1.

'Tis time,Reply. I see, to make an end. Your discourse runs low, and dreggy. Do you think it is one and the same thing to say, That the Ceremonial Law was a yoke of bondage to them that were un­der it, and to say it was an Adam's Cove­nant? Are these two parallel distinctions in your Logick? Alas! Sir, there is a wide difference. The difficulty, varie­ty, and chargeableness of those Ceremo­nies, made them indeed burthensome and tiresome to that People; but they did not make the Covenant, to which they were annexed, to become an Adam's Co­venant of Works: for in the very next breath, vers. 11. the Apostle will tell you, they were saved; yea, and tells us, that we shall be saved even as they. So that either they that were under this yoke, were saved by Faith in the way of Free­grace, as we now are; or we must be saved in the way of legal Obedience, as they were. Take which you please, for one of them you must take. We shall be saved, even as they, Acts 15. 10, 11.

[Page 237] If you can make no stronger opposi­tion to my Arguments, than such as you have here made, your Cause is lost; though your confidence and obstinancy re­main. It were easy for me to fill more Paper than I have written on this Subject, with Names of principal note in the Church of God, who with one voice de­cry your groundless Position, and con­stantly affirm, that the Law in the com­plex sense you take it, as it comprehends the Ceremonial Rites and Ordinances whereunto Circumcision pertains, is, and can be no other than the Covenant of Grace, though more obscurely admini­stred. But because Latin Authors are of little use to you, and among English ones, the Judgment of Dr.Vol. 2. Serm. 2. pag. 247, 248, 250. Crisp, I sup­pose, will be instar omnium with you: I will recite it faithfully out of his Sermon upon the two Covenants, where he makes the Old and New Covenants to be indeed two distinct Covenants of Grace, (for which I see no reason at all) but proves the former to be so in these words.

‘It is granted of all men, That in the Covenant of Works there is no remission of Sin, there is no notice of Christ; but the whole business or imployment of [Page 238] the Priests of the old Law, was altoge­ther about remission of Sins, and the exhibiting and holding forth of Christ in their fashion unto the People. In the 15th of Numbers, vers. 28. (I will give you but one Instance) there you shall plainly see, That the administra­tion of that Priestly Office had remis­sion of Sins as the main end of that Ad­ministration. If a Soul sin through ig­norance, he shall bring a She-goat unto the Priest, and he shall make an atonement for the Soul that sinneth ignorantly, and it shall be forgiven him: See, the main end is administring forgiveness of Sins.’

‘And that Christ was the main Sub­ject of that their Ministry, is plain, because the Apostle saith in the Verse before my Text, That all that Admini­stration was but a Shadow of Christ, and a Figure for the present to represent him, as he doth express in the 9th Chapter of this Epistle. And the truth is, the usual general Gospel that all the Iews had, was in their Sacrifices and Priestly Observations.’

‘So that it's plain, the administration of their Covenant was an administra­tion of Grace, and absolutely distinct [Page 239] from the administration of the Cove­nant of Works.’ And what can be said more absolutely and directly contradicto­ry to your Position, than this is? And yet again, p. 250. speaking to that Scri­pture, Heb. 8. 8. ‘where the Apostle distinguishes of a better and a faulty, of First and Second; he saith, Finding fault with them, The days come, when I will make a new Covenant with the House of Israel, and with the House of Judah, not according to the Covenant I made with their Fathers, when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the Land of Egypt; and (as Ieremiah adds it, for the Apostle takes all this out of Ier. 31. 31.) although I was an Husband to them; and in the close of all, Your Sins and Iniquities will I remember no more.—Here are two Covenants, a new Covenant, and the Covenant he made with their Fathers. Some may think it was the Covenant of works at the promulgation of the Moral Law; but mark well that Expression of Ieremiah, and you shall see it was the Covenant of Grace. For (saith he) not according to the Covenant I made with their Fathers, although I was an Husband unto them. How can God be considered [Page 240] as Husband to a People under the Cove­nant of Works, which was broken by man in innocency, and so became disannulled or impossible by the breach of it? The Co­venant of Works runs thus: Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Book of the Law; and, In the day thou sinnest, thou shalt die the death. Man had sinned before God took him by the hand to lead him out of the Land of Egypt, and Sin had separated Man from God: how then can God be called an Husband in the Covenant of Works? The Covenant therefore was not a Covenant of Works, but such a Cove­nant as the Lord became an Husband in, and that must be a Covenant of Grace, &c.

How the Doctor makes good his two distinct Covenants of Grace, I see not, nor expect ever to see proved, and is not my present concernment to enquire; but once it is evident by what he hath here said, That the Ceremonial Law, where­of Circumcision is a branch, can be no other than the Covenant of Grace. And nothing is more common among our Di­vines, than to prove not only the Sinai Law, but God's Covenant with Abra­ham, Gen. 17. to be the Covenant of [Page 241] Grace by this Medium, That God having entred into a Covenant of Grace with Abra­ham before, would never bring him under a Covenant of Works afterwards, which must nullify and void the former. And beside, such a Covenant of Works as you make this, was never heard of in the World, wherein God promises to be a God to A­braham, and his Seed, in their Genera­tions, upon the rigorous and impossible Terms of Adam's Covenant.

By this time, I presume, you must feel the force of those Arguments produced against your vain and groundless notion; and how little you are able to do to de­liver your Thesis from them, but the more you struggle, the more still you are intangled. Go which way you will, your Absurdities follow you as your Sha­dow. —haeret lateri lethalis arundo. Leaving therefore all your Absurdities upon you, till God shall give you more illumination and ingenuity to discern and acknowledge them; I shall pass on to the examination of your third Position, which led you into these other gross Mistakes; and if God shall convince you of your Er­ror in this point, I hope it may prove a means of recovering you out of the rest: [Page 242] which in love to your Soul, I heartily desire.

III. Your third Position is, That God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. can be no other than the Covenant of Works, be­cause Circumcision was the Condition of it: For (say you) the new Covenant is altoge­ther absolute, and unconditional.

Of the Conditionality of the New Covenant.

This Question, Whether the Covenant of Grace be conditionate or absolute, was moved (as a learned Man observes) in the former Age, by occasion of the Con­troversy about Justification, betwixt the Protestants and Papists. Among the Protestants, some denied, and others af­firmed the Conditionality of the Gospel-covenant. Those that denied it, did so for fear of mingling Law and Gospel, Christ's Righteousness and Man's, as the Papists had wickedly done before. Those that affirmed it, did so out of fear also; lest the necessity of Faith and Holiness being relaxed, Libertinism should be that way introduced. But if the Question were duly stated, and the sense of its [Page 243] Terms agreed upon, the Gospel-Covenant may be affirmed to be conditional, to se­cure the People of God from Libertinism, without the least diminution of the Righ­teousness of Christ, or clouding the Free­grace of God.

I did in my first Answer to your Call, endeavour to prevent the needless trou­ble you have here given your self, by a succinct state of the Question: telling you the Controversy betwixt us, is not, (1.) Whether the Gospel-covenant re­quires no duties at all of them that are under it? nor (2.) Whether it requires any such Conditions as were in Adam's Covenant, namely, perfect, personal, and perpetual Obedience under the pe­nalty of the Curse, and admitting no place of Repentance? nor (3.) Whether any Condition required by it on our part, have any thing in its own nature meri­torious of the Benefits promised? nor (4.) Whether we be able in our own strength, and by the power of our Free-will, without the preventing, as well as the assisting Grace of God, to perform any such work or duty as we call a Con­dition? These things I told you were to be excluded out of this Controversy. But the only Question betwixt us, is, [Page 244] Whether in the New Covenant, Quest. some act of ours (though it have no merit in it, nor can be done in our own single strength) be not required to be performed by us antecedently to a blessing or privilege consequent by ver­tue of a promise? And whether such an act or duty, being of a suspending nature to the blessing promised, it have not the true and proper nature of a Gospel-condition?

In your Reply (contrary to all rule and reason) you include and chiefly argue against the very Particulars by me there excluded; and scarcely (if at all) touch the true Question, as it was stated, and by you ought accordingly to have been considered. I might therefore justly think my self discharged from any fur­ther concernment with you about it: for if you will include what I plainly exclu­ded, you argue not against mine, but ano­ther man's Position, which I am not con­cerned to defend. You here dispute a­gainst meritorious Conditions, which I explode and abhor as much as your self. You say, p. 34. of your Reply, that a Condition plainly implies something of merit, by way of condignity or congruity; which is false, and turns the Question from me to the Papists. And were it not more for the clearing up of so great a [Page 245] Point for the instruction and satisfaction of others, than any hope you give me of convincing you, I should not have touch­ed this Question again, unless I had found your Replies more distinct and pertinent. But finding the Point in controversy of great weight, I will once more tell you,

  • 1. What the word [Condition] sig­nifies.
  • 2. In what sense it is by us used in this Controversy.
  • 3. Establish my Arguments for the conditionality of the New Cove­nant.

(1.) And first we grant, That nei­ther our word [Condition] nor your term [Absolute] are either of them found in Scripture, with respect to God's cove­nanting with Man; so that we contend not about the signification of a Scripture term. But though the word Conditional be not there, yet the thing being found there, That brings the word Conditional into use in this Controversy. For we know not how to express those [...] sacred Particles, [...] &c. If, If not, Vnless, But if, Ex­cept, Only, and the like, which are fre­quently used to limit and restrain the [Page 246] Grants and Privileges of the New Co­venant, Rom. 10. 9. Matt. 18. 3. Mark 5. 36. Mark 11. 26. Rom. 4. 24. I say, we know not how to express the true sense and force of these Particles in this Controversy, by any other word so fit and full as the word Conditional is. Now this word Condition being a Law-term, is variously used among Iurists; and the various use of the word, occasions that confusion which is found in this Con­troversy. He therefore that shall clearly distinguish the various senses and uses of the word, is most likely to labour with success in this Controversy. I shall therefore briefly note the principal senses and uses of the term, and shew in what sense we here take it. Of Conditions there be two sorts.

Conditions.
  • 1. Antecedent
  • 2. Consequent

As to the latter, namely, consequent Conditions, you your self acknowledge, p. 100. ‘That in the outward dispen­sation of the Covenant, many things are required of us in order unto the participation or enjoyment of the full end of the Covenant in glory.’

[Page 247] So then the Covenant is acknowledg­ed to be consequently conditional,Si promis­siones foe­derisintel­liganturde fine, nemo negare po­test esse conditio­nale [...]; quià fiunt sem­per sub conditio­ne fidei. & poeniten­tiae. Tur­rettine. which is no more than to say with the Apostle, Without holiness no man shall see God; or, that if any man draw [...] back, his soul shall have no pleasure in him, &c. Our Contro­versy therefore is not about consequent Conditions, laid by God upon Believers, after they are in Christ and the Cove­nant; the Covenant so considered, à po­steriori, will not be denied to be Condi [...]tional. The only Question is about An­tecedent Conditions; and of these we are here to consider,

  • 1. Such as respect the first Sanction of the Covenant in Christ.
  • 2. Such as respect the application of the benefits of the Covenant unto Men
    Si foedus specterur ratione sanctionis primae in Christo, nullam habet conditionem praeviam; sed solâ gratiâ Dei, & Christi merito nititur. Sed si attendatur ratione acceptationis & applicationis in fideli, condi­tionem habet Fidem, quae hominem unit Christo, & sic in commu­nionem foederis mittit. Turret. vol. 2. p. 203.
    .

As to the first Sanction of the Cove­nant in Christ, we freely acknowledg [...]t hath no previous Condition on Man [...]s part; but depends purely and only upon the Grace of God, and Merit of Christ. So that our Question proceeds about such [Page 248] antecedent Conditions only as respect the Application of the Benefits of the Cove­nant unto Men. And of these Antece­dent Conditions there are likewise two sorts, which must be carefully distin­guished.

  • 1. Such Antecedent Conditions which have the force of a meritorious and impulsive Cause, which being performed by the proper strength of Nature, or at most by the help of common assisting Grace, do give a Man a right to the reward or blessings of the Covenant. And in this sense we utterly disclaim antecedent Conditions, as I plain­ly told you, p. 61. of my Vindiciae, &c. Or,
  • 2. An Antecedent Condition signify­ing no more than an Act of ours, which though it be neither per­fect in every degree, nor in the least meritorious of the benefit con­ferred; nor performed in our own natural strength; yet according to the constitution of the Covenant, is required of us in order to the blessings consequent thereupon by vertue of the Promise: and conse­quently [Page 249] the benefits and mercies granted in the Promise in this or­der are, and must be suspended by the Donor or Disposer of them, un­til it be performed. Such a Con­dition we affirm Faith to be. But here again, Faith [...] the Condition of the New Cove­nant, is considered,
    • 1. Essentially. Or,
    • 2. Organically and Instrumentally.

In the first consideration of Faith, ac­cording to its Essence▪ it is contained un­der Obedience, and in that respect we exclude it from justifying our persons, or entitling us to the saving-mercies of the New Covenant, as it is a work of ours; and so I excluded it, p. 133. of my Method of Grace, which you igno­rantly or wilfully mistake, when in your Reply, p. 88, 89. you object it against me. Faith considered in this sense, is not the Condition of the Covenant, nor can pretend to be so, more than any o­ther Grace. But

We consider it Organically, Relatively, and (as most speak) Instrumentally, as it receives Christ, Ioh. 1. 12. and so [Page 250] gives us power to become the Sons of God; it being impossible for any Man to partake of the saving benefits of the Covenant, but as he is united to Christ. For all the Promises of God in him are yea; and in him, Amen, 2 Cor. 1. 20. And united to Christ no Man can be, be­fore he be a believer; for Christ dwel­leth in our hearts by Faith, Eph. 3. 17. Upon which Scriptural Grounds and Reasons it is, that we affirm Faith to be an Antecedent Condition, or, Causa sine quâ non, to the saving benefits of the new Covenant; and that it must go before them, at least in order of nature, which is that we mean, when we say Faith is the antecedent Condition of the New Covenant. And those that deny it to be so, as the Antinomians do, who talk of actual and personal Justification from Eternity, or at least from the death of Christ, must consequently assert the actual Justification of Infidels; and not only disturb, but destroy the whole order of the Gospel, and open the Sluces and Flood-gates to all manner of licentious­ness.

And thus our Pious and Learned Di­vines generally affirm Faith to be the condition of the Covenant.Moses's Self-denial. p. 188. So Mr. Iere­miah [Page 251] Burroughs, ‘Faith (saith he) hath the great honour above all other Graces, to be the Condition of the second Cove­nant; therefore certainly it is some great matter that Faith enables us to do. Whatsoever keeps Covenant with God, brings strength, though it self be never so weak; as Sampson [...]s Hair. What is weaker than a little Hair? Yet because the keeping that, was keeping Covenant with God; therefore even a little Hair was so great strength to Sampson. Faith then, that is the Con­dition of the Covenant, in which all Grace and Mercy is contained, if it be kept, it will cause strength indeed to do great things.’

And as this excellent Man, Mr. Bur­roughs, is in this sense for the Conditio­nality of the New Covenant; so are the most Learned and Eminent of our own Divines. Dr. Edward Reynold's assigning the differences betwixt the two Cove­nants, gives this for one:Dr. Rey­nold's his Life of Christ. p. 512. ‘They differ in the Condition (saith he); there Le­gal Obedience, here only Faith; and the certain consequent thereof, Repen­tance. There is difference likewise in he manner of performing these Con­ditions: For now God himself begins [Page 252] first to work upon us, and in us, be­fore we move or stir towards him. He doth not only command us, and leave us to our created strength to obey the Command; but he furnisheth us with his own Grace and Spirit to obey the Command.’

Of the same judgment is Dr. Owen. Dr. Owen Treatise of Redemp­tion. Book 3. chap. 1. p. 103, 104. And in his Tract of Iu­stification, p. 299, &c. ‘Are we able (saith he) of our selves to fulfil the Condition of the New Covenant? Is it not as easie for a Man by his own strength to fulfil the whole Law, as to repent, and believe the Promise of the Gospel? This then is one main difference of these two Co­venants, That the Lord did in the Old only require the Condition; now in the New, he also effects it in all the foederates to whom the Covenant is ex­tended.’ This is the Man you pretend to be against Conditions.

Mr. William Pemble opening the na­ture of the two Covenants,Pemble, of Iustif. Sect. 4. Chap. 1. p. 214, 215, 216, 217. saith, ‘The Law offers Life unto Man upon con­dition of perfect Obedience; the Go­spel offers Life unto Man upon ano­ther condition, to wit, of Repentance, and Faith in Christ.’ And after his proofs for it, saith, ‘From whence we conclude firmly, That the difference [Page 253] between the Law and the Gospel, as­signed by our Divines, is most certain and agreeable to the Scriptures, viz. That the Law gives Life unto the just, upon condition of perfect obedience in all things; the Gospel gives Life unto sinners, upon condition they repent and believe in Christ Jesus.’

Learned and judicious Mr. William Perkins thus;Perkins, Order of Causes, Chap. 31. p. 17. ‘The Covenant of Grace is that whereby God freely promising Christ and his Benefits, exacts again of Man, that he would by Faith receive Christ. And again, in the Covenant of Grace two things must be consider­ed, the Substance thereof, and the Con­dition. Reformed Catholick, of Iustif. p. 570. The Substance of the Covenant is, That Righteousness and Life Ever­lasting, is given to God's Church and People by Christ. The Condition is, That we for our parts are by Faith to receive the foresaid Benefits; and this Condition is by Grace, as well as the Substance.

That Learned, Humble, and Painful Minister of Christ Mr. Iohn Ball, Mr. J. Ball of the Co­venant of Grace, Chap. 1. Of the Ne [...] Covenant, p. 198. stating the difference betwixt the two Cove­nants, shews, that in the Covenant at Sinai, in the Covenant with Abraham, and that with David, that in all these [Page 254] Covenant expressures, there are for sub­stance the same Evangelical conditions of Faith and Sincerity.

Dr. Davenant thus:Davenant De Justif. Act. cap. 30. ‘In the Cove­nant of the Gospel it is otherwise; for in this Covenant, to the obtainment of Reconciliation, Justification, and Li [...]e Eternal, there is no other condition required than of true and lively Faith, Iohn 3. 16. Therefore Justification, and the right to Eternal Life, doth de­pend on the Condition of Faith alone.’

Dr. Downame harmonizeth with the rest in these words: ‘That which is the only Condition of the Covenant of Grace,Tract. 1. Of Iustif. Lib. 6. cap. 8. Sect. 10. and Lib. 7. cap. 2. Sect. 6. by that alone we are justified: But Faith is the Condition of the Co­venant of Grace, which is therefore called Lex Fidei. Our Writers (saith he) distinguishing the two Covenants of God, that is, the Law and the Gospel, whereof one is the Covenant of Works, the other the Covenant of Grace, do teach, That the Law of Works is that which to Justification requireth works as the Condition thereof: The Law of Faith that, which to Justification re­quireth Faith as the Condition thereof. The former saith, Do this, and thou shalt live; the latter, Believe in Christ, and thou shalt be saved.

[Page 255] But what stand I upon particular, though renowned names? You may see a whole Constellation of our sound and famous Divines in the Assembly, thus ex­pressing themselves about this Point. ‘The Grace of God (say they) is ma­nifested in the second Covenant, in that he freely provideth, and offereth to sinners a Mediator,Larger Ca­tech. 4to. London 1648. p. 8. and Life and Salvation by him, and requiring Faith as the Condition to interest them in him, promiseth and giveth his Holy Spirit to all his Elect, to work in them that Faith, with all other saving Gra­ces, and to enable them to all holy Obedience, as the evidence of the truth of their Faith, &c.

I could even tire the Reader with the Testimonies of eminent foreign Divines, as Cameron de triplici foedere, Thes. 82. Vrsinus & Paraeus explicatio Catech. Quest 18. de foedere. Wendeline, Chri­stian Theology, Lib. 1. cap. 19. Thes. 9. Poliander, Rivet, Wallaeus, and Thysius, the four learned Professors at Leyden, Sy­nops. Disp. 23. Sect. 27, &c. And as for those Ancient and Modern Di­vines, whom the Antinomians have corrupted and misrepresented, the Reader may see them all vindicated, [Page 256] and their concurrence with those I have named, evidenced by that Learned and Pious Mr. Iohn Graile, in his Modest Vin­dication of the Doctrine of Conditions in the Covenant of Grace, from p. 58. on­ward; a Man whose name and memory is precious with me, not only upon the account of that excellent Sermon he Preached, and those fervent Prayers he poured out many years since at my Ordi­nation; but for that Learned and Judi­cious Treatise of his against Mr. Eyre, wherein he hath cast great light upon this Controversy, as excellent Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Woodbridge have also done. But alas, what evidence is sufficient to satisfy ignorant and obstinate Men!

Sir, it pities me to see the lamentable confusion you are in. You are forced by the evidence of truth to yield and own the substance of what I contend for. You have yielded the Covenant to be consequently Conditional in p. 84. of your Reply. You have also as plainly yielded, that the Application of Pardoning Mercy unto our Souls, is in order of nature conse­quent unto believing; p. 31. of your Re­ply. From both which concessions in your own words recited, this Conclusion is evident and unavoidable, viz.

[Page 257] That no adult person, notwithstand­ing God's Eternal Election, and Christ's meritorious death and satisfaction, ac­cording to the Constitution and Order of the New Covenant, can either be justi­fied in this World, or saved in the World to come, unless he first believe.

For if the Application of Pardoning Mercy unto our Souls, is in order of Na­ture consequent unto believing (as you truly affirm it to be) then according to the Constitution and Order of the New Covenant, no application of pardoning Mercy can be made to our Souls before we believe. And if it be evident (as you say it is, p. 84.) that unto a full and com­pleat enjoyment of all the Promises of the Covenant, Faith on our part is required; then as no Man can be actually justified in this World, so neither can he be saved before, or without Faith in the World to come. And if you did but see the true suspending nature of Faith, which you plainly yield in these two concessions; you would quickly grant the conditional nature of it: For what is the proper na­ture and true notion of a Condition, but to suspend the benefits and grants of that Covenant in which it is so inserted? And thus the Controversy betwixt us is fairly [Page 258] issued. But I doubt you understand not what you have here written, or are troubled with a very bad memory: Be­cause I find you in a far different note from this in p. 103. of your Reply, where you say, ‘That if Iesus Christ fulfilled the Law, and purchased Heaven and Happiness for Men (as all true Prote­stants hitherto have taught) then no­thing can remain, but to declare this to them, to incline them to believe and accept it; and to prescribe in what way, and by what means they shall finally come to inherit Eternal Life. To affirm there­fore, that Faith and Repentance are the Conditions of the New Covenant required of us in point of Duty, antecedent to the benefit of the Promise, doth necessarily suppose, that Christ hath not done all for us, nor purchased a right to Life for any; but only made way that they may have it upon certain terms, or (as some say) he hath merited that we might me­rit: But the Conditions of the Covenant are not to be performed by the Head and Members both, Gal. 4. 4. Christ there­fore having in our stead performed the Conditions of Life, there remains no­thing but a Promise, and the Obedience of Children, as the fruit and effect there­of [Page 259] to them that believe in him, together with means of obtaining the full possession, which here we want.

Either these passages I have here cited and compared,Reply: were fetched at a great distance of time, out of Authors differ­ing as much in judgment as you and I do; and so the dissonancy of them is the meer effect of oblivion, and incogitancy: Or else your Intellectuals are more con­fused and weak than I am willing to su­spect them to be. For if the applica­tion of Pardoning Mercy to our Souls▪ is in order of Nature consequent to Be­lieving (as you truly say it was); then certainly, notwithstanding Christ's ful­filling the Law, and purchasing Heaven and Happiness for Men, something else must remain to be done, besides declaring this to them, to incline them to believe and accept it, or prescribing to them in what way they shall finally come to in­herit Eternal Life. For besides those declarations and prescriptions you talk of, Faith it self must be wrought in the Souls of Men, or else Pardoning Mercy is not in order of Nature consequent un­to believing, as you said it was: For all the external Declarations and Prescrip­tions in the World are not Faith it self, [Page 260] but only the means to beget it; which may, or may not, become effectual to that end.

Secondly, Whereas you say, that this (senseless notion) is consequent upon the Doctrine of all true Protestants, you therein grosly abuse them, and make all the true Protestants in the World guilty of worse than Arminian or Antinomian dotage. The Antinomian, indeed, makes our actual justification to be nothing else but the manifestation or declaration of our Justification from Eternity, or the time of Christ's death. And the Armi­nian tells us, That the Declaration of the Gospel to Men, is sufficient to bring them to Faith by the assisting Grace of the Spirit.▪ But your notion is worse than the very dregs of both, and yet you tack it as a just consequent to the Do­ctrine of all true Protestants.

Thirdly, You say,Reply. P. 104. That to affirm Faith and Repentance to be the Conditions of the New Covenant required of us in point of Duty, antecedent to the benefit of the Pro­mise, doth necessarily suppose that Christ hath not done all for us, nor purchased a right to Life for any; but only made way that they may have it upon certain terms, or merited that we might merit. Here, [Page 261] Sir, you vilely abuse all those worthy Divines before mentioned, who have made Faith the Condition of the New Covenant, pinning upon them both Po­pery and Iudaism. Popery, yea, the dregs of Popery, in supposing their Doctrine necessarily implies that Christ hath merited that we might merit. And Iudaism to the height, in saying, their Doctrine necessarily supposes that Christ hath not purchased a right of Life to any. What can a Iew say more? Ah, Mr. C. can you read the words I have recited out of blessed Burroughs, Owen, Pemble, Perkins, Davenant, Downame, yea, the whole Assembly of Reverend and Holy Divines, with multitudes more (who have all with one mouth asserted Faith to be the Condition of the New Co­venant required on Man's part, in point of Duty; and that Men must believe before they can be justified; which is the very same thing with what I say, That it is antecedent to the benefit of the Promise) and not tremble to think of the direful char­ges you here draw against them? The Lord forgive your rash presum­ption.

[Page 262] Fourthly, Whereas you say, Christ hath in our stead performed the Conditions of life, and that there remains nothing but a Promise,Sal [...]marsh, of Free­grace. p. 126, 127. &c. you therein speak at the highest dialect of Antinomianism; Hath not Christ by his Life and Death per­formed the Conditions of Life in our stead? yet you your self confess, that pardoning Mercy is in order of nature consequent to our believing; certainly then there is something more to be done beside the mere making, or being of a Promise: there must be the effect of the Promise in our hearts; yea, the effects of those absolute Promises of the first Grace, Ezek. 36. Ier. 32. Or else notwithstand­ing Christ's performance of Redemption on his part, we can neither be justified nor saved. For I don't think you intend to lay the Conditions of Repentance or believing upon Christ, who in the New Covenant hath laid them upon us, tho in the same Covenant he graciously under­takes to work them in us: and yet your words sound in that wild Antinomian Note.

But,Objection. I suppose, you take my Notion to be as self-repugnant as your own, when I say Faith is an antecedent Condi­tion to Justification: because I also say, [Page 263] this Grace is also supernaturally wrought in us, and is not of our selves. This staggers you, and is the very stone you stumble at all along this Controversie: for in your sense, p. 34. every Condition is meritorious by condignity or congruity.

First, What do I say more in all this,Reply. than what those Worthies before-men­tioned do expresly affirm? Doth not Dr. Owen (the man whom you deserved­ly value) make Conditions both in Adam's Covenant and the New, with this difference, that Adam's Covenant requi­red them, but the New Covenant effects them in all the Foederates? Sir, We take it for no contradiction to assert, That the planting of the Principle, and the assi­sting and exciting of the Acts of Faith, are the proper Works of the Spirit of God, and are also contained in the abso­lute Promises of the New Covenant, Ezek. 36. 26, 27. Ier. 32. 39, 40. And yet Faith, notwithstanding this, is truly and properly our work and duty; and that upon our believing, or not believing, we have, or have not, an actual interest in Christ, Righteousness, and Life. For though the Author of Faith be the Spirit of God, yet believing is properly our Act, and an Act required of us by a [Page 264] plain Command, 1 Iohn 3. 23. This is the Command of God, That ye believe. And if its being wrought in God's strength makes it cease to be our Work, I would fain know what Exposition you would give of that place, Phil. 2. 12, 13. Work out your own Salvation, &c. for it is God that worketh in you both to will and to do. And as this Faith is truly and properly our work, though wrought in God's strength (for it is not God, but we, that do believe) so it is wrought in us by him (by your own confession) before the ap­plication of pardoning Mercy, which is consequent in order of nature thereunto: and therefore hath the true nature of an antecedent Condition, which is that I contend for; and did you but understand your own words, you would not contend against.

Oh,Object. 2. but say you, p. 34. every Con­dition is meritorious, either by way of congruity or condignity.

This is your ignorance of the nature of a Condition,Reply. with which I find you as unacquainted as with the nature of a Co­venant. A Condition, whilst unper­formed, only suspends the act of the Law or Testament: it being the will of the Testator, Legislator, or Donor, that [Page 265] his Law or Testament should act or ef­fect, when the Condition is performed, and not before: but it is not essential to a Condition, to be a meritorious or impul­sive cause moving him to bestow the be­nefit for the sake thereof. A man freely gives another out of his love and bounty such an Estate or Sum of Money, which he shall enjoy if he live to such a year, or day; and not before: is this quando dies veniet, this appointed time the meritori­ous or impulsive cause of the gift? sure­ly no man will say it: but that it is a causa sine quâ non, or a Condition suspend­ing the enjoyment of the gift, no man will deny that knows what the nature of a Condition is. An act meritorious by way of Congruity, is that to which a re­ward is not due out of strict justice, but out of decency, or some kind of meetness. Merit of condignity is a voluntary action, for which a reward is due to a man out of justice, and cannot be denied him with­out injustice. Our Faith is truly the Con­dition of the New Covenant, and yet we detest the meritoriousness of it in either sense.

But you object my words to me in my Method of Grace, Object. 3. where I assert the im­possibility of believing without the ef­ficacy [Page 266] of supernatural Grace, p. 102, 103.

Sir, I own the words you quote,Reply. and am bold to challenge the most envious Eye that shall read those lines, to shew me the least repugnancy betwixt what I said there, and what I have said in my Vindiciae Legis, &c. p. 9. of the Prolego­mena, and p. 61. of that Book. You shew your good-will to make an advan­tagious thrust; but your Weapon is too short, and can draw no blood. But lea­ving these weak and impertinent Cavils, let us come to your Solution of my Argu­ments, p. 98. by which I proved the Conditionality of the New Covenant. My first Argument was this.

If we cannot be justified or saved till we believe,Argu­ment 1 and are justified when we believe; Then Faith is the Condition on which those consequent Benefits are su­spended, &c.

The sum of your Answer (without denying,Answer. distinguishing, or limiting one Proposition) is this, That, ‘here Faith is properly put into the room of perfect Obedience, and is to do what perfect Obedience was to do under the Law: whereas (say you) Faith is only ap­pointed as an Instrument to receive and [Page 267] apply the Righteousness of Christ, which is the alone matter of our Justi­fication before God; and Faith it self is not our Righteousness, as it would be if it were a Condition, p. 105, 106.’

Not to note the weakness and imper­tinence of this Answer,Reply. I shall only take notice of what you here allow, and grant, That Faith is appointed as an In­strument to receive and apply the Righte­ousness of Christ, which is the alone matter of our Iustification before God. Whence I infer three Conclusions.

First, That we cannot be justified be­fore God till we believe, except you can prove, that the unaccepted and unapplied Righteousness of Christ doth actually ju­stify our persons before God.

Secondly, That the justification of our persons before God, is, and must be su­spended (as by a non-performed Condi­tion) untill we actually believe. Which two Conclusions yield up your Cause to my Argument, which you here seem to oppose.

Thirdly, That hereby you perfectly renounce and destroy your Antinomian Fancy before-mentioned, That if Christ have fulfilled the Law, and purchased Heaven for men, nothing can remain but [Page 268] to declare this to them, &c. for it seems by this, they must receive and apply Christ's Righteousness by Faith, or they cannot be justified (you say not declaratively in their own Consciences, but) before God. And thus instead of answering, you have confirmed and yielded my first Argument, and only oppose your own Mistakes, not the sense or force of my Arguments, in all that you say to it, or the Scriptures pro­duced to prove it.

To my second Argument, Argu­ment 2. recited p. 94. where I argued from God's Covenant with Abraham, and proved it to be con­ditional; and yet by you acknowledged to be a pure Gospel-covenant: all that you say, is, That you have dispatched that before, in your Discourse about the Covenant of Circumcision, and there­fore will say nothing to it here.

In saying nothing to it here,Reply. you have said as much as you did before in the place you refer to; and therefore find­ing nothing said here or there, I con­clude you can say nothing to it at all.

My third Argument was this.Argu­ment 3. If all the Promises of the Gospel be absolute and unconditional, then they do not pro­perly belong to the New Covenant. That cannot properly and strictly be a Cove­nant [Page 269] which is not a mutual Compact, and in which there is no restipulation, nor reobligation: 'tis a naked Promise, not a Covenant.

To this you answer three things.Answer. p. 113, 114. In the first branch of your Answer you im­pudently beg the Question, by saying, That you have proved already in your Replies to my former Arguments, that the New Covenant is wholly free and abso­lute. Upon this absurd Petitio Princi­pii you make bold to invert my Argu­ment thus in your second Reply. If all the Promises of the Gospel be wholly abso­lute and unconditional, they do properly and truly belong to the New Covenant: But so they are. Therefore, &c. Oh rare Disputant! In the last place, in opposition to the Sequel of my Major Proposition, you tell me you will oppose the Judgment of Dr. Owen on Heb. 8. 10. where he saith, That a Covenant pro­perly is a Compact or Agreement on certain terms stipulated by two or more Parties, &c. and that the word [...] there used, it signifies a Covenant im­properly, &c.

If you call this an opposition to the Se­quel of my Major, Reply. either your Brains or mine do want Hellebore. Doth he not [Page 270] say the very same thing I do, that there must be a restipulation in [...] proper Cove­nant? And as for the word [...], which (he saith) signifieth a Covenant improperly, but prop [...]rly is a Testamen­tary Disposition, I fully concur with him therein. But I hope a Testamentary Dis­position may have a Condition in it; to be sure such a one as I assert Faith here to be, which is the free gift of God; and in this sense I shewed you before where the Doctor yields Faith to be the Condition of the New Covenant.

My fourth Argument was this.Argu­ment 4. If all the Promises of the New Covenant be absolute and unconditional, and have no respect nor relation to any grace wrought in us, or duty done by us; then the trial of our Interest in Christ by marks and signs of Grace is not our duty, nor can we take comfort in Sanctification as it is an evidence of our Justification, &c.

Your Answer is,Answer. p. 120. That ‘at this rate I may prove quidlibet à quolibet: for it doth not follow, that, because the New Covenant is absolute, therefore it hath no respect nor relation to any Grace wrought in us, nor Duty done by us, or that we may not justly take comfort in Sanctification as an evidence of our Justification.’

[Page 271] If I had a mind to learn the art of pro­ving quidlibet à quolibet, Reply. and make my self ridiculous to others by such foolish attempts, I know no Book in the World fitter to instruct me therein, than yours. Certainly you have the knack of it, and gave us an instance of it but now, in con­futing the Sequel of my Major by an Al­degation out of Dr. Owen, which expresly confirms and establishes it. But to the Point, I would willingly know how it is possible for Sanctification to be a true and certain mark and sign of Justification, when (according to the Antinomian Principle, which you here too much comprobate and espouse) a man may be justified before he believe, yea, before he is a man, even from the time of Christ's death, and (as others of them speak) from eternity. A true mark and sign must be proper to, and inseparable from that which it signifies. Now if that be true which you said before, That after Christ's fulfilling of the Law in his own person, &c. nothing can remain but to declare this to men to incline them to believe and accept it, and to prescribe in what way they shall come to inherit eternal life. If this be all that can remain to us, then no­thing but the Declarations and Prescrip­tions [Page 272] of the Gospel, which are things without us, can remain to be marks and signs of Justification to us: and conse­quently all those to whom those Declara­tions and Prescriptions are made and given, have therein the marks and evi­dences of their Justification. But I am truly weary of such stuff. I am sure the Apostle places Vocation before Iustifica­tion, Rom. 8. 30. Whom he called, them he justified. And without an immediate Testimony from Heaven, I know not how to evidence and prove my Justifi­cation, but from, and by my faith, and other parts of Sanctification; whereby I apprehended and applied the Righte­ousness of Christ: if you can prove it from the Declarations and Prescriptions of the Gospel, I cannot.

My Fifth and last Argument ran thus.Argu­ment 5. If the Covenant of Grace be altogether absolute and unconditional, requiring no­thing to be done on our part, to entitle us to its benefits; then it cannot be man's duty in entring Covenant with God, to deliberate the terms, count the cost, or give his consent by word, or writing, to the terms of this Covenant: for where there are no terms at all (as in absolute Promises there are none) there can be [Page 273] none to deliberate. But I shewed you, this is man's duty, from clear and unde­niable Scriptures, &c.

You say by way of answer hereunto,Answer. p. 122, 123. that, ‘you must tell me, that the Scri­ptures do make a plain distinction be­twixt the New and Everlasting Cove­nant which God hath been pleased to make with Sinners in Jesus Christ; and the return of that sincere and duti­ful obedience which he requires of us, by way of answer thereunto. (2.) You say, there are many things, which tho promised in the Covenant, and wrought in us by the Grace of God; are yet du­ties indispensably required of us in or­der to the participation of the full end of the Covenant in glory: and in re­spect hereof, we are indeed to delibe­rate the terms, count the cost, and give up our selves solemnly to him with sincere resolutions, &c. But then you thought I had understood there had been a vast difference betwixt God's Covenant with us, and our Co­venant with God, citing Ezek. 16. 59, 60, 61. where God promiseth to give them their Sisters for Daughters, but not by their Covenant. And with this you compare Psal. 89. My Covenant [Page 274] will I not break; where (you say) we find a plain distinction betwixt God's Covenant with them, and their duty to God. And lastly, you say, p. 105. that the want of a due observation of this plain Scripture-distinction, be­twixt God's free and absolute Cove­nant made with Sinners in Christ, and our Covenants with God by way of return thereunto; is the true reason of all our mistakes about the true nature of the Gospel-Covenant, whilst we jumble and co [...]found together that which the Scriptures do so plainly di­stinguish.’

To your first Answer, I say:Reply. It is true, the Scriptures do distinguish be­twixt Covenant, and Covenant; that of Works, and that of Grace. It also distinguishes the same Covenant of Grace for substance, according to its va­rious administrations, into the Old, and New Covenant. It also distinguishes betwixt the promissory part of the same Covenant of Grace, and the restipulatory part; not as of two opposite Covenants, (as you distinguish them, Gen. 17.) but as the just and necessary parts of one and the same Covenant. It also distinguishes betwixt Vows made by Men to God in [Page 275] some particular Cases, and the Cove­nant of Grace betwixt God and them. But what's all this to your purpose? Or in what point doth it touch my Argu­ment? You desire me to cast mine eye upon Ezek. 16. and Psal. 89. I have done so, and that impartially; and do assure you, I admire why you produce them against my Argument. That in Ezek. speaks of the enlargement of the Church by the accession of the Gentiles to it; and the sense of those words seems to me to be this; That this enlargement of the Church is a gracious addition, or something beyond what God had ever done in his former dispensations of the Covenant to that People. And for Psal. 89. I know not what you meant to produce it for, unless it be to prove what I never denied, That notwithstand­ing our failures in duty towards God, God will still keep his Covenant with us; though he will visit the Iniquities of his Covenant-p [...]ople with a Rod.

To your second Answer, That we are to deliberate the terms, and count the cost, with respect to those duties, which are in order to the participation of the full end of the Covenant in glory: by which, I suppose, you mean Self-denial, Perse­verance, [Page 276] &c. I have no Controversy with you about that. Our Question is, Whether there be no deliberations re­quired of, or to be performed by men, who are not yet in Christ by justifying Faith, but under some preparatory works towards Faith? And whether at the very time of their closing with Christ, there be not a consent of the Will unto those terms required of them? If you say there be (as by the places I alledged it evidently appears there are) then you yield the point I contend for. If you say they are not before, or at the time of believing, to consider any terms, or give their consent to them by word or wri­ting; such an Answer would fly in the very face of those Scriptures I produced: for then a man may be in covenant with­out his own consent: he that deliberates not, consents not; non consentit, qui non sentit. And therefore you durst not speak it out (for which modesty I com­mend you) and so leave me with half an answer, not touching that part, viz. An­tecedent deliberations which were con­cerned in this Argument. And now let your most partial Friends judge, Whe­ther from this performance of yours, you have any just ground for that vain boast [Page 277] which concludes your Answer, viz. ‘That the Covenants themselves, which those Privileges are bottomed on, are now repealed, and that there is no room left for any other Argument to infer the Bap­tism of Infants:’ at least, I shall willingly commit it to the judgment of all intelligent and impartial Readers, Whether Mr. Cary hath any real ground in this performance of his, for such a Thrasonical Conclusion, such a vain and fulsome Boast?

I find that with like confidence he hath also attempted a Reply to Mr. Ioseph Whiston, a Reverend, Learned, and Aged Divine, who hath accurately and successfully defended God's Covenant with Abraham, against Mr. Cox; and doubt not, if Mr. Cary, and his Party, have but confidence enough to expose it to the publick view, and to adventure the Cause of Infant-baptism upon it, the World will quickly see an end of this long-con­tinued and unhappy Controversy, which hath vexed the Church of God, and alie­nated the Affections of good Men: and that the Wisdom of Providence hath per­mitted and over-ruled this last Attempt, to the singular advantage of the Truths of God, and tranquillity of good Men, whose concernment (at this time especi­ally) [Page 278] is rather to strengthen their Faith, and heighten their Encouragements from God's gracious Covenant, than to un­dermine it, when all things beside it are shaking and tottering round about them.

And now, Sir, for a Coronis to all those things that have been controverted betwixt us about the Covenants of God, and the right of Believers Infants to Bap­tism resulting from one of them, which I have asserted and argued against you in my first Answer, and you have silently and wholly pass'd over in your Reply, hoping to destroy them all at once, by proving God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. to be a pure Adam's Covenant of Works; I judge it necessary, as mat­ters now lie between us, to give the Rea­der the grounds and reasons of my Faith and Practice with respect unto the Ordi­nance of Infant Baptism, and that as succinctly and clearly as I can, in the following Theses; which being laid to­gether by an unprejudiced and considera­tive Reader, will, I think, amount to more than a strong probability, That it is the will of God, that the Infant-seed of Believers ought now to be baptized.

[Page 279] But here I must remind the Reader,P. [...]1, 62. and beg him to review what I have said before in th [...] third Cause of Errors, That to arrive to satisfaction in this point, re­quires a due and serious search of the whole Word of God, with a sedate, ra­tional, and impartial mind; comparing one thing with another, though they lie scattered at a distance in the Scriptures; some in the Old Testament, and some in the New. Bring but these things to an interview, as we do in discovering the change of the Sabbath, and we may arrive unto a due satisfaction of the Will of God herein. This, I confess, calls for strength of mind, great sedulity, attention and impartiality; and yet what man would think all this too much, if it were but to clear his Childrens Title unto a small Earthly Inheritance? I intend not to give the Reader here an account of all the Arguments drawn from several Scripture Topics by the strenuous Defenders of In­fants Baptism; but to keep only to the Arguments drawn from God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. which is the Scripture mainly controverted betwixt us: You affirming boldly and dange­rously, that Covenant to be no other than an Adam's Covenant of Works; and I [Page 280] justly denying and abhorring your Posi­tion upon the grounds and reasons before given, which you neither have, nor ever will be able to destroy. Now that the Reader, who hath neither time, nor ability, to reade the Larger, and more elaborate Treatises on this Subject, may [...], in one short view, see the deduction of Believers Infants right to Baptism from this Gospel-covenant of God with Abraham, I shall gather the substance of what I contend for, and lay it as clearly as I can before the Eyes of my Reader in the following Theses; which being distinctly considered as to the evident truth of each, and then ra­tionally compared one with the other, he will see how each fortifies other, and how all together do strongly confirm this Conclusion, That the Infants of Believers under the Gospel, as they naturally des­cend from Abraham's Spiritual Seed, are therefore Partakers at least of the Exter­nal Privileges of the visible Church, and therefore ought now to be baptized.

Thesis I.

It hath pleased God in all Ages of the World, since man was created, to deal with his Church and People by way of Covenant, [Page 281] and in the same way he will still deal with them unto the end of the World.

God might have dealt with us in a su­pream way of mere Sovereignty and Do­minion, commanding what Duties he pleased, and establishing his Commands by what Penalties he had pleased, and never have brought himself under the tye and obligation of a Covenant to his own Creatures: but he chuses to deal fa­miliarly with his People, the way of Co­venanting being a familiar way, 2 Sam. 7. 19. Is this the manner of men, O Lord God! or (as Iunius renders it) and that after the manner of men, O Lord God! 'Tis a way full of condescending grace and goodness: he is willing hereby his People should know what they may cer­tainly expect from their God, as well as what their God requires of them. Here­by also he will furnish them with mighty Pleas and Arguments in Prayer, suc­cour their Faith against Temptations; strengthen their hands in duties of Obe­dience, sweeten their Obedience to them, and discriminate his own People from the World.

As soon therefore as man was created and placed in Paradise, being made up­right, and throughly furnished with Abi­lities [Page 282] lities perfectly and compleatly to obey all the Commands of his Maker; the Lord immediately entred into the Covenant of Works with him, and with all his natu­ral Posterity in him: and in this Cove­nant his standing or falling was accord­ing to the perfection and constancy of his personal Obedience, Gen. 2. 17. Gal. 3. 10. But in this First Covenant of Works no provision at all was made for his reco­very (in case of the least failure) by his repentance or better obedience; but the Curse immediately seized both Soul and Body: and Sin by the Fall entring into Man's nature, totally disabled him to the perfect performance of any one Duty, as that Covenant required it to be done, Rom. 8. 3. nor would God accept any Repentance, or after-endeavours, in lieu of that perfect Obedience due by Law. So that from the Fall of Adam, to the end of the World, this Covenant ceaseth as a Covenant of Life, or a Co­venant able to give Righteousness and Life unto all Mankind for evermore, Rom. 3. 20. Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no stesh be justified in his sight. Gal. 2. 16. [...]y the works of the Law shall no [...] justified. Gal. 3. 11. But that no Man is justified by the Law in the sight [Page 283] of God, is evident. And it being so evident, that Righteousness and Life being for ever impossible to be obtained upon the terms of Adam's Covenant, it must therefore be a self-evident truth, That since the Fall, God never did, and to the end of the World he never will open that way or door to Life (thus block'd up by an absolute impossibility) for the justifi­cation and salvation of any Man.

Thesis II.

Soon after the violation and cessation of this first Covenant, as a Covenant of Life, it pleased the Lord to open and publish the second Covenant of Grace by Iesus Christ, the first dawning whereof we find in Gen. 3. 15. where the Seed is promised which shall bruise the Serpent's head. And though this be but a very short, and somewhat obscure discovery of Man's Remedy and Salvation by Christ; yet was it a joyful sound to the ears of God's people, it was even life from the dead to the Believers of those times. For we may rationally conclude, That that space of time be­twixt the breaking of the first, and ma­king of the second Covenant; was the most dismal period of time that ever the World did, or shall see. This Covenant [Page 284] of Grace now took place of the Covenant of Works, comprehended all Believers in the bosom of it. The Covenant of Works took place from the time it was made until the fall of Adam, and then was abolished as a Life-giving Covenant. The second Covenant took place from the time it was made soon after the fall, and is to continue to the end of the World. And these only are the two Covenants God hath made with Men; the latter succeeding the former, and commencing from its expiration; but both cannot possibly be in force together at the same time, and upon the same persons, as co­ordinate Covenants of Life and Salvation. For in co-ordination they expel and de­stroy each other, Gal. 5. 4. Whosoever of you are justified by the Law, ye are fallen from Grace. The first Covenant was a Covenant without a Mediator; the se­cond is a Covenant with a Mediator. Place a Believer under both at once, or put these two Covenants in co-ordina­tion, and that which results will be a pure contradiction, viz. That a Man is saved without a Mediator, and yet by a Mediator. Moreover, if there be a way to Life without a Mediator, there was no need to make a Covenant in and [Page 285] with a Mediator; nor can those words of Christ be true, Ioh. 4. 6. I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh to the Father but by me.

The Righteousness of the first Cove­nant was within Man himself; the Righ­teousness of the second Covenant is with­out Man in Christ. Put these two in co-ordination, and that which results is as pure a contradiction as the former; viz. That a Man is justified by a Righteous­ness within him, and yet is justified by a Righteousness without him; expresly contrary to the Apostle's conclusion, Rom. 3. 20. Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight. It is therefore an intolerable ab­surdity to place believers under both these Covenants at the same time; under the Curse of the first, and Blessing of the second. For whensoever the state of any person is changed by Justification, his Covenant is changed with his State, Col. 1. 13. 'Tis as unimaginable that a Believer should thus stand under both Covenants, as it is to imagine that a Man may be born of two Mothers, Gal. 4. 22, 23, 24, 25. or a Woman lawfully Mar­ried to two Husbands, Rom. 7. 1, 2, 3, 4. and more absurd (if it be possible any [Page 286] thing can be more absurd) to attribute the most glorious privilege of the Cove­nant of Grace, (viz. I will be a God to thee, and to thy seed after thee, Gen. 17. 7.) to the impotent and abolished Cove­nant of Works; both which absurdi­ties are asserted in defence of Antipoedo­baptism.

And though it be true, that after the first Edition of the Covenant of Grace, the matter of the first Covenant was re­presented to the Israelites in the Moral Law; yet that representation was in­tended and designed to be subservient, and added to the Promise, Gal. 3. 19. and so (as an Acute and Learned Divine Turret­tini, Pars 2da. loc. 12. p. 248. speaks) the very Decalogue or Moral Law it self pertained to the Covenant of Grace; yea, in some sort flowed out of this Covenant, as it was promulged by the Counsel of God to be serviceable to it; both anteccdently to lead Men by the conviction of sin, fear of wrath, and self-despair, to the Covenant of Grace; and also consequently as it is a pattern of Obedience and Rule of Holiness. For had it been published as a Covenant de­signed intentionally to its primitive use and end, it had totally frustrated the Co­venant of Grace.

Thesis III.

Though the primordial Light or first glimmerings of this Covenant of Grace, were comparatively weak and obscure; yet from the first publication of it to Adam, God in all Ages hath been amplifying the privileges, and heightning the glory of this second Covenant in all the after expressures and editions of it unto this day, and will more and more amplify and illustrate it to the end of the World.

That first Promise, Gen. 3. 15. is like the first small Spring or Head of a great River, which the farther it runs, the big­ger it grows by the accession of more Waters to it. Or like the Sun in the Heavens, which the higher it mounts, the more bright and glorious the day still grows.

In that period of time, betwixt Adam and Abraham, we find no token of God's Covenant ordered therein to be applied to the Infant-Seed of Believers. But in that second Edition of the Covenant to Abraham, the privileges of the Covenant were amplified, and his Infant-Seed, not only taken into the Covenant (as they were before) but also added to the visi­ble Church, by receiving the token of [Page 288] the Covenant, which then was Circum­cision; and so here is a great addition made to the visible Church, even the whole Infant Off-spring of adult Belie­vers.

From that period, until the coming of the Messiah in the flesh, the Iewish Church, and their Infant-Seed, except only some few Proselytes out of the Gen­tile Nations, made up the visible Church of God, and the poor Gentiles were with­out Christ, being aliens from the Com­mon-wealth of Israel, and strangers from the Covenants of Promise, having no hope, and without God in the World, Ephes. 2. 12. but in this glorious third period, the Covenant again enlarges it self more than before, and the Privile­ges of it are no longer limited and re­strained to the Iewish Believers and their Infant-Seed; but the Gentiles also are taken into the Covenant, and the door of Faith was opened unto them, Acts 14. 27. the partition-wall was now broken down, which separated the Church from the Gentile World, Eph. 2. 14. This was a glorious enlargement of the Covenant, and many glorious Prophecies and Pro­mises were fulfilled in it; such as those, Isa. 11. 10. and 42. 1, 6. 49. 22. 54. 3. 60. 3, 5, 11, 16. 62. 2, &c.

[Page 289] And though the Covenant, as to its external part, seems to have lost ground in the breaking off of the Iewish Nation from the Church; yet, like the Sea, what it loses in one place, it gains with advantage upon another; the addition of many Gentile-Nations to the Church, more than recompences for the present breaking off of that one Nation of the Iews. And indeed they are broken off but for a time; for God shall Graff them in again, Rom. 11. 23. This therefore being the design of God, and steddy Course of his Covenant of Grace, more and more to enlarge it self in all Ages; nothing can be more opposite to the na­ture of this Covenant, than to narrow and contract its privileges in its farther progress, and cut off a whole Species from it, which it formerly took in.

Thesis IV.

It is past all doubt and contradiction, that the Infant-Seed of Abraham, under the second edition of the Covenant of Grace, were taken with their believing Parents into God's gracious Covenant, had the Seal of that Covenant applied to them, and were thereby added to the visible Church, Gen. 17. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. [Page 290] which was a gracious Privilege of the Covenant superadded to all the former, and such as sweeps away all the frivolous and groundless cavils and exceptions of those that object the incapacity of In­fants to enter into Covenant with God, or receive benefit from the external pri­vileges of the visible Church. Nor can the subtilest enemy to Infants Baptism, give us a convincing reason why the In­fants of Gentile Believers are not equally capable of the same benefits that the In­fants of Iewish Believers were, if they still stand under the same Covenant that the former stood under; and God hath no where repealed the gracious Grant for­merly made to the Infant-Seed of his Covenant-people.

Thesis V.

It is to me clear beyond all contra­diction, from Rom. 11. 17. If some of the branches be broken off, and thou being a wild Olive-tree, wert grafted in amongst them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the Olive-tree: I say, I can scarce desire a clearer Scripture-light than this Text gives, to satisfy my understand­ing in this case, That when God brake off the unbelieving Iews from the Church, [Page 291] both Parents and Children together; the Believing Gentiles, which are as truly Abraham's Seed as they were, Gal. 3. 29. yea, the more excellent Seed of Abraham, were implanted or ingrafted in their room, and do as amply enjoy the Privi­leges of that Covenant, both internal and external, for themselves, and for their Infant-Seed, as ever any Members of the Iewish Church did or could do.

Our Adversaries in this Controversy do pitifully and apparently shuffle here, and invent many strange and unintelligi­ble distinctions to be-cloud the light of this famous Text. What they are, and how they are ba [...]fled, the Reader will ea­sily discern from what hath already pass'd betwixt my Antagonist and me, in p. 108, &c. of my Vindiciae Legis & foederis. It is plain, that Abraham is the root, the Olive-tree the Visible Church; the Sap and Fatness of the Olive, are Church Or­dinances and Covenant-Privileges; the Gentile Believers, who are Abraham's Seed according to Promise, are the in­grafted Branches standing in the place of the natural Branches, and with them, or in like manner as they did, partaking of the Root and Fatness of the Olive-Tree, that is, as really and amply enjoy­ing [Page 292] all the immunities, benefits and pri­vileges of the Church and Covenant (amongst which the initiating Sign was one, and a chief one too) as ever the natural Branches that were broken off, that is, the Iewish Parents and their Chil­dren, did or might have done. And to deny this (as before was noted) is to straiten Covenant-privileges in their farther progress.

Thesis VI.

Suitably hereunto we find, that no soon­er was the Christian Church constituted, and the Believing Gentiles by Faith ad­ded to it; but the Children of such Be­lieving Parents are declared to be foede­rally Holy, 1 Cor. 7. 14. and the unbe­lieving Iews, who were superstitiously fond of Circumcision, and prejudiced a­gainst Baptism as an injurious innova­tion, are by the Apostle perswaded to sub­mit themselves to it, Acts 2. 38, 39. as­suring them, that the same Promise, viz. I will be a God to thee, and to thy seed after thee, is now as effectually sealed to them and their Children by Baptism, as it was in the former Age by Circumcision: And that the Gentiles which are yet a far off, whenever God shall call them, shall [Page 293] equally enjoy the same Privilege, both for themselves and for their Children also.

We also find a Commission given by Christ to the Disciples, Matt. 28. 19, 20. To disciple all nations, baptizing them, &c. from which Discipleship, Infants ought not to be excluded, Acts 15. 10. Yea, we find, that as at the institution of Cir­cumcision, Abraham the Father and Ma­ster of the Family was first circumcised in his own person, and then his whole houshold, Gen. 17. 23, 24. Answerably, as soon as any person by Conversion, or publick profession of Faith, became a visible Child of Abraham, that person was first Baptized, and the whole Houshold with him or her, Acts 16. 33. 15. 'Tis unreasonable to put us upon the proof, that there were Infants in those Houses; it being more than probable, that in such frequent Baptizing of Housholds belong­ing to Believers, there were some In­fants; but if there were none, 'tis e­nough for us to prove from their foederal holiness, 1 Cor. 7. 14. and the extent of God's Promise to them, Acts 2. 38, 39. If there had been never so many Infants in those Housholds, they might and ought to have been Baptized. How the [Page 294] true sense and scope of the two last men­tioned Scriptures are maintained and vin­dicated against Mr. Cary's corrupt glosses and interpretations; see my Vindiciae Le­gis & Foederis, pag. 90. 91. We do not lay the stress of Infants Baptism up­on such strictures as the Baptizings of the Housholds of Believers, or Christ's ta­king up in his Arms, and blessing the little ones that were brought to him. These and many other such things found in the History of Christ, and Acts of the Apostles, have their use and service to fortify that Doctrine. But if we can produce no example of any Believer's In­fant Baptized, the merit of the Cause lies not in the matter of fact, but Cove­nant-right. For our Adversaries them­selves, if we go to matter of fact, will be hard put to it to produce us one in­stance out of the New-Testament of any Child of a Believing Christian whose Baptism was deferred, or by Christ or his Apostles ordered to be deferred, un­til he attained the years of maturity, and made a personal profession of Faith himself.

Thesis VII.

The change of the Token and Seal of the Covenant from Circumcision to Baptism, will by no means infer the change or diver­sity of the Covenants, especially when the latter comes into the place, and serves to the same use and end with the former, as it is manifest Baptism doth, from Col. 2. 11, 12. as hath been, I think, sufficiently ar­gued against Mr. Cary's glosses and ex­ceptions, pag. 100, 101. of my Vindiciae Legis & Foederis. The Covenant is still the same Covenant of Grace, though the external initiating sign be changed. For what is the substantial part of the Cove­nant of Grace now, but the same it was to Abraham and his Seed before? Is not this our Covenant of Grace, Heb. 8. 10. I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people? And in what words was Abraham's Covenant expressed, Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my Covenant between me and thee, and thy seed after thee in their gene­rations for an everlasting Covenant, to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee. This makes Abraham's Covenant, sealed to him and his Seed, as truly and proper­ly the Covenant of Grace, as that which Baptism now seals to Believers and their [Page 296] Seed. The rash ignorance of those that affirm, God may become a People's God in the way of a special interest, by vir­tue of the broken and abolished Cove­nant of works, rather deserves sharp re­prehension, and sad lamentation, than a confutation; which, nevertheless out of respect to my Friend Mr. Cary, I have given it in its proper place in this Re­joynder.

I hope by this time I have made it evident, That the defenders of Infants Baptism, as it is established upon God's Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. have not so mistaken their Ground, as Mr. Cary hath, by his endeavours to car­ry that Covenant as an Adam's Covenant of Works, through such a multitude of other errors and absurdities, as he draws along with it in his way of reasoning.

A Postscript to Mr. Cary.

SIR,

I Resolved not to disturb my mind with your passionate provoking Lan­guage, at least whil'st I was busily em­ployed in searching for Reason and Ar­gument (two scarce Commodities) a­mongst heaps of vain and fulsome words. Nor will I now imitate your folly and rudeness, lest I become an Offender, whilst I am to act the part of a Repro­ver. When I read your Title, A Iust and Sober Reply, and presently fell in a­mong rude insults, silly evasions, and such inartificial discourses as follow in your Book; I began to challenge you in my thoughts, for matching such bad stuff with so fair and lovely a Title: But a se­cond thought quickly corrected the for­mer; for I considered no Man living could justly forbid the Marriage betwixt your Book and its Title, since there is not the least kindred or relation between them.

Had your Answers been just, you would have observed the Rules of a Re­spondent, which you have not done: And if they had been sober, you had never [Page 298] been so free in your reproaches, and spa­ring in your Arguments as you have been. Is this the Man, of whom it is said in the Epistle to his Solemn Call, That his Lines are free from reflection and reproach towards those of the perswasion he con­tends with? Is this my old friendly Neighbour? It calls to my mind the Ita­lian Proverb, God keep us from our Friends, and we will do what we can to keep our selves from our Enemies. And though you act the part of an Enemy, you shall be my Friend whether you will or no. If you will not be my Friend out of Love, I will make you so by a good improvement of your Hatred.

I have been musing with my self, what might be the true cause of all your rage against my Book; One while I thought it proceeded from want of discretion, that you were not able to distinguish betwixt an Adversary in a Controversie, and an Adversary to the Person; but thought every blow that was given to your Error, must needs be a mortal wound to your Reputation. But, Sir, how close and smart soever my Discourses against your Errors be, I'm sure they are more full of civility and respect to you, than such a Reply as you have made deserves: And [Page 299] if in exposing your Errors, your Repu­tation be expos'd, you must blame them for occasioning it, and not me.

Some times I thought it an effect of your Policy, that when followed close, and hard put to it, you endeavoured an escape this way. Camero speaking of this kind of subtilty in his Adversaries, saith, Faciunt quod quarundam ferarum ingenium est, ut foetore & graveolenti [...], defectae jam viribus, ac fractae venatorem abigunt. Some cunning Animals, as Foxes, &c. when pursued at the heels, drive away both Dogs and Huntsmen with their in­tolerable stench. And Hierom long ago told Helvidius, his Adversary, Arbitror te veritate convictum, ad maledicta con­verti; being vanquished by Truth, he betook himself to ill Language. After the same manner you act here, being no longer able to defend your self by solid and sober ratiocination, you trust to your faculty in crimination. Bad Cau­ses only drive Men into such refuges.

In a word, I am satisfied nothing but your extravagant zeal for your Idolized Opinion, could have thrown you into such disingenuous Methods and Artifices as these. The Ephesians were quiet e­nough till their Diana began to totter. [Page 300] Your passionate Outcries signify to me, something is touched to the quick, which you are more fondly in love with than you ought. When one told Luther what hideous Out-cries his Enemies made a­gainst him, and how they reviled him in their Books: I know by their roaring (said he) that I have hit them right.

You tell me in your Reply, p. 24. That you perceive I have a mighty itch to find out your Absurdities. I wish, Sir, you were no more troubled with the itch after them, than I am after the discovery of them. Had I affected such Employ­ments, I could easily have gathered three to one out of your Book, more than I did: And have represented those I ga­ther'd, much more odiously (and yet justly) than I did. But Friendship con­strain'd me to handle them (because yours) as gently as I could.

I might have justly charg'd you from what you say, p. 174, 175. of your So­lemn Call: where you place all the Be­lievers on Earth, without exception of any, under the Covenant of Works, as a ministration of Death and Condemna­tion; and the severest Penalties of a dreadful Curse: I might thereupon have [Page 301] justly charg'd you for presenting to the World such a monstrous Sight as was ne­ver seen before since the Creation, viz. A whole Church of condemned and cur­sed Believers. This I might as well have charged upon your Position, and done it no wrong.

I could tell you from what you say, p. 76. of your Reply, That God doth in­deed in the Covenant of Works make over himself to Sinners, to be their God in a way of special Interest; but it being upon such hard terms, that it is utterly impossible that way to attain unto life, &c. I could justly have told you, That these Passages of yours, drop pure nonsense upon the Rea­der's Understanding: as if Salvation were impossible to be attain'd by the same Co­venant wherein God becomes our God, and makes over himself by way of special interest, to us.

Had I had an itch to expose the Bur­lesque and ridiculous Stuff, which lies obvious enough in your Book; I should then have told your Reader, That ac­cording to your Doctrine, how opposite and inconsistent soever the two Cove­nants of Works and Grace be, yet the same Subjects, viz. Believers, may at once, not only stand under them both, [Page 302] but that the same common Seal, viz. Cir­cumcision, equally ratifies and confirms them both; for you allow in your Call, p. 205. That it sealed the Covenant of Grace to believing Abraham, and yet was a Seal of the Covenant of Works, yea the very condition of that Covenant, as you frequently affirm it to be. Vide, p. 81. of your Reply, and Passim.

I could as easily and justly have told you, That the most malicious Papist could scarcely have invented a more hor­rid Reproach against our famous Or­thodox Protestant Divines, than you (I dare not say maliciously, but) ignorant­ly have done, when you charge such men as Mr. Francis Roberts, Mr. Oba­diah Sedgwick; and indeed all that assert the Law, complexly taken, to be an ob­scurer Covenant of Grace; that they com­prize perfect doing with the consequent Curse for non-performance; and belie­ving in Christ unto life and salvation in one and the same Covenant. This is an intolerable abuse of yours, p. 5. of your Reply. They generally assert the Law, in that complex sense and latitude you take it, to be a true Covenant of Grace, though more obscurely administred; and that the distinction of the Covenants in­to [Page 303] Old and New, is no parallel distinction with that of Works and Grace, or Christ's and Adam's Covenant. Your publick recantation of the Injury you have done the very Protestant Cause herein, is your unquestionable duty, yet scarce a due re­paration of the Injury.

In a word, I cannot but look upon it as a discovery of your great weakness, That when you meet with such a diffi­culty as poses your Understanding, and you cannot possibly reconcile with your Notion; as that of Paul's circumcising Timothy, and you affirming that the very act of Circumcision did in its own nature oblige all on whom it pass'd, to the per­fect observation of the Law for Righte­ousness. You will rather chuse to leave the blessed Apostle in a contradiction to his own Doctrine, than to your vain No­tion; For what do you say, p. 95. of your Reply? That however the case stood in that respect, this is certain, &c. It also argues weakness in you to insist upon, aggravate, jeer, and reproach at that rate you do, p. 83. of your Reply. For the mistake, and misplacing of one Figure, viz. Gen. 12. for Gen. 17. as if the merit of the whole Cause depended on it.

[Page 304] The like I may say of your charging me with Nonsense, for putting Gen. 17. 7, 8. for Gen. 17. 9, 10. when yet you your self, p. 205. of your Call, tell us, That Circumcision was appointed as a Sign or Token of the Covenant, Gen. 17. 7, 8, 9. What pitiful Trifles are these to raise such a mighty triumph upon? When Dureus accused our famous Whitaker for one or two trivial verbal Mistakes, Whi­taker return'd him the same Answer I shall give you, Benè habet, his in rebus non vertuntur fortunae Ecclesiae. 'Tis well the Case of the Church depends not up­on such Trifles.

For a Conclusion; I do seriously w [...]rn all men to beware of receiving Doctri [...]es so destructive to the great Truths of the Gospel as these are. And I do solemnly profess, I have not designedly strained them, to cast reproach upon him that publish'd them; But the matters are so plain, that if Mr. Cary will maintain his Positions, not only my self, but every intelligent Reader, will be easily able to fasten all those odious Consequents upon him, after all his Apologies.

[Page 305] Sir, in a word, I dare not say, but you are a good Man; but since I read your two Books, you have made me Think more than once of what one said of Ionah after he had read his History, that he was a strange Man of a good Man; yet as strange a good Man as you are, I hope to meet you with a sounder Head, and better Spirit, in Heaven.

The Second APPENDIX:

Giving a brief Account of the Rise and Growth of ANTI­NOMIANISM; the de­duction of the principal Errors of that Sect: With modest and seasona­ble Reflections upon them.

THE Design of the following Sheets, cast in as a Mantissa to the foregoing Discourse of Er­rors, is principally to discharge and free the Free-grace of God from those dange­rour Errors, which fight against it under its own Colours; partly to prevent the seduction of some that stagger; and last­ly, (though least of all) to vindicate my own Doctrine, the scope and current whereof hath always been, and shall ever be, to exalt the Free-grace of God in Christ, to draw the vilest of Sinners [...] [Page 308] to him, and relieve the distressed Con­sciences of Sin-burthened Christians.

But notwithstanding my utmost care and caution, some have been apt to cen­sure it, as if in some things it had a tang of Antinomianism: But if my publick or private Discourses be the faithful Mes­sengers of my Judgment and Heart, (as I hope they are) nothing can be found in any of them casting a friendly aspect up­on any of their Principles, which I here justly censure as erroneous.

Three things I principally aim at in this short Appendix.

  • 1. To give the Reader the most pro­bable Rise of Antinomianism.
  • 2. An Account of the principal Er­rors of that Sect.
  • 3. To confirm and establish Christians against them, by sound Reasons back'd with Scripture-authority. And

I.
Of the Rise of Antinomianism.

The Scriptures foreseeing there would arise such a sort of Men in the Church as would wax wanton against Christ, and turn his Grace into lasciviousness; hath not only precautioned us in general to be­ware of such Opinions as corrupt the [Page 309] Doctrine of Free-grace, Rom. 6. 1, 2. Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid: but hath particu­larly indigitated and marked those very Opinions by which it would be abused, and made abundant provision against them; as namely,

1. All slighting and vilifying Opinions or Expressions of the Holy Law of God, Rom. 7. 7, 12.

2. All Opinions and Principles inclining men to a careless disregard and neglect of the Duties of Obedience, under pretence of Free-grace and Liberty by Christ, Iam. 2. Matth. 25.

3. All Opinions neglecting or slight­ing Sanctification as the evidence of our Justification, and rendring it needless or sinful to try the state of our Souls by the Graces of the Spirit wrought in us, which is the principal scope of the First Epistle of Iohn.

Notwithstanding, such is the wicked­ness of some, and weakness of others, that in all Ages (especially the last past, and present) men have audaciously bro­ken in upon the Doctrine of Free-grace; and notoriously violated and corrupted it, to the great reproach of Christ, scandal of the World, and hardning of the Ene­mies [Page 310] of Reformation. Behold (saith Contzen the Iesuit on Matth. 24.) the fruit of Protestantism, and their Gospel­preaching.

Nothing is more opposite to looseness than the Free-grace of God, which teach­eth us, That denying all ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righ­teously, and godly in this present world. Nor can it without manifest violence be made pliable to such wicked purposes. And therefore the Apostle tells us, Iude 4. That this is done by turning the Grace of our Lord into lasciviousness: [...], transferring it, scil. foedâ interpre­tatione, by a corrupt, abusive interpreta­tion, to such uses and purposes as it ab­hors. No such wanton, licentious Con­clusions can be inferr'd from the Gospel­doctrines of Grace and Liberty, but by wresting them against their true scope and intent, by the wicked Arts and Pra­ctices of Deceivers upon them.

The Gospel makes Sin more odious than ever the Law did, and discovers the punishment of it in a more severe and dreadful manner, than ever it was disco­vered before, Heb. 2. 2, 3. For if the word spoken by Angels were stedfast, and every transgression and disobedience re­ceived [Page 311] a just recompence of reward; How shall we escape if we neglect so great salva­tion? It shews our obligations to duty, to be stronger than ever; and our encou­ragements to holiness greater than ever; 2 Cor. 7. 1. and yet corrupt Nature will be still tempting men to corrupt and abuse it. The more luscious the Food is, the more men are apt to surfeit up­on it.

This perversion and abuse of Free-grace and Christian-liberty, is justly chargeable (though upon different ac­counts) both upon wicked, and good Men. Wicked Men corrupt it design­edly, that by entitling God to their Sins, they might sin the more quietly and se­curely. So the Devil instigated the Hea­thens to sin against the Light and Law of Nature, by representing their gods to them as drunken and lascivious Deities. So the Nicolaitans, and School of Simon, and after them the Gnosticks, and other Hereticks, in the very dawning of Go­spel Light and Liberty, began presently to loose the bond of restraint from their Lusts, under pretence of Grace and Li­berty. The Aetiani blushed not to teach,August. de Haeres. Tom. 6. Haeres. 54. That Sin, and perseverance in Sin, could hurt the Salvation of none, [Page 312] so that they would embrace their Prin­ciples.

How vile and abominable Inferences the Manichaeans, Valentinians, and Cer­donites, drew from the Grace and Li­berty of the Gospel in the following Ages, I had rather mourn over, than re­cite. And if we come down to the 15 th Century, we shall find the Libertines of those days as deeply drenched in this Sin, as most that went before them. [...] Li­bert. [...] 2. Calvin mournfully observes, That under pre­tence of Christian-liberty, they trampled all Godliness under foot. The vile Courses their loose Opinions soon carried them in­to, plainly discovered for what intents and purposes they were projected and calcu­lated: and he that reads the Preface to that Grave and Learned Mr. Thomas Ga­taker's Book, entituled, God's Eye upon Israel, will find, That some Antinomians of our days are not much behind the worst and vilest of them. One of them cries out, Away with the Law, away with the Law, it cuts off a man's Legs, and th [...]n bids him walk. Another saith, Tis as possible for Christ himself to sin, as for a Child of God to sin. That if a man by the Spirit know himself to be in the state of grace, though he be drunk, or commit mur­ther, [Page 313] God sees no sin in him: with much more of the same Bran, which I will not transcribe.

But others there be, whose Judgments are unhappily tainted and leavened with these loose Doctrines; yet being in the main godly persons, they dare not take liberty to sin, or live in the neglect of known duties, though their Principles too much incline that way. But though they dare not, others will, who imbibe corrupt notions from them; and the re­nowned Piety of the Authors will be no antidote against the danger, but make the Poison operate the more powerfully, by receiving it in such a vehicle. Now it is highly probable such men as these might be charmed into such dangerous Opinions upon such accounts as these.

(1.) 'Tis like some of them might have felt in themselves the anguish of a perplexed Conscience under sin; and not being able to live with these terrors of the Law, and dismal fears of Con­science, might too hastily snatch at those Doctrines which promise them relief and ease, as I noted before in the 5th Cause of my Treatise of Errors. And that this is not a guess at random, will appear from the very Title-page of Mr. Salt­marsh's [Page 314] marsh's Book of Free-grace, where (as an inducement to the Reader to swallow his Antinomian Doctrine) he shews him this curious Bait. It is (saith he) an experiment of Iesus Christ upon one who hath been in the bondage of a troubled Con­science at times for the space of about twelve years, till now upon a clearer discovery of Iesus Christ in the Gospel, &c.

(2.) Others have been induced to espouse these Opinions from the excess of their Zeal against the Errors of the Pa­pists, who have notoriously corrupted the Doctrine of Iustification by Free-grace; decried imputed, and exalted in­berent Righteousness above it. The Pa­pists have designedly and industriously sealed up the Scriptures from the People, lest they should there discover those sove­reign and effectual Remedies which God hath provided for their distressed Con­sciences, in the riches of his own Grace, and the meritorious Death of Christ; and so all their Masses, Pilgrimages, Au­ricular Confessions, with all their dear Indulgences, should lie upon their hands as stale and cheap Commodities. Oh, (said Stephen Gardiner) let not this gap of Free-grce be op [...]ned to the People.

[Page 315] But as soon as the Light of Reforma­tion had discovered the Free-grace of God to Sinners, (which is indeed the only effectual remedy of distressed Con­sciences) and by the same Light the hor­rid Cheats of the Man of Sin were disco­vered; all good men, who were en­lightened by the Reformation, justly and deeply abhorred Popery, as the Enemy of the Grace of God, and true Peace of Conscience, and fixed themselves upon the sound and comfortable Doctrines of Justification by Faith through the alone Righteousness of Christ. Mean while thankfully acknowledging, that they which believe, ought also to maintain good Works. But others there were, transported by an indiscreet Zeal, who have almost bended the Grace of God as far too much the other way, and have both spoken and written many things very unbecoming the Grace of God, and tending to looseness and neglect of Duty.

(3.) 'Tis manifest that others of them have been ingulphed, and suckt into those dangerous Quick-sands of Antino­mian Errors, by separating the Spirit from the written Word: If once a man pretend the Spirit without the Scriptures [Page 316] to be his Rule, whither will not his own deluding Fancies carry him under a vain and sinful pretence of the Spirit!

In the Year 1528. when Helsar, Traier and Seekler, were confuted by Hallerus; and their Errors about Oaths, Magistrates, and Paedo-baptism were de­tected by him, and by Colvius at Bern, that which they had to say for themselves was, That the Spirit taught them other­wise than the letter of the Scriptures speaks. So dangerous it is to separate what God hath conjoined, and father our own Fancies upon the Holy Spirit.

(4.) And it is not unlike, but a com­parative weakness and injudiciousness of mind meeting with a fervent zeal for Christ, and his Glory, may induce others to espouse such taking and plausible, tho pernicious, Doctrines. They are not a­ware of the dangerous Consequences of the Opinions they embrace, and what looseness may be occasioned by them. I speak not of Occasions taken, but given, by such Opinions and Expressions. A good Man will draw excellent Inferences of duty from the very same Doctrine. Instance that of the shortness of time, from whence the Apostle infers absti­nence, strictness and diligence, 1 Cor. [Page 317] 7. 29. but the Epicure infers all manner of dissolute and licentious practices, Let us eat and drink; for to morrow we shall die, 1 Cor. 15 22. The best Doctrines are this way liable to abuse.

But let all good men beware of such Opinions and Expressions as give an han­dle to wicked men to abuse the Grace of God, which haply the Author himself dare not do, and may strongly hope o­thers may not do: but if the Principle will yield it, 'tis in vain to think corrupt Nature will not catch at it, and make a vile use, and dangerous improvement of it.

For example; If such a Principle as this be asserted for a truth before the World, That men need not fear that any, or all the Sins they commit, shall do them any hurt; let the Author, or any man in the World warn, and caution Readers (as the Antinomian Author of that Ex­pression hath done) not to abuse this Do­ctrine, 'tis to no purpose. The Doctrine it self is full of dangerous Consequents, and wicked men have the best skill to in­fer and draw them forth to cherish and countenance their Lusts: that which the Author might design for the relief of the distressed, quickly turns it self into poison [Page 318] in the bowels of the wicked; nor can we excuse it by saying any Gospel-truth may be thus abused: for this is none of that number; but a Principle that gives of­fence to the godly, and encouragement to the ungodly. And so much as to the rise and occasion of Antinomian Errors.

II.

In the next place, let us view some of the chief Doctrines commonly called Antinomian, amongst which there will be found a [...], the radical and most prolifique Error, from which most of the rest are spawned and pro­created.

Error I.

I shall begin with the dangerous mi­stake of the Antinomians in the Doctrine of Iustification. The Article of Justifi­cation is deservedly stiled by our Divines, Articulus stantis, vel cadentis Religionis, the very Pillar of the Christian Reli­gion.

In two things however I must do the Antinomians right. (1.) In acknow­ledging, that though their Errors about Justification be great and dangerous, yet they are not so much about the substance, [Page 319] as about the mode of a Sinner's Justifica­tion: An Error far inferior to the Error of the Papists, who depress the Righte­ousness of Christ, and exalt their own inherent Righteousness in the business of Justification. ( [...].) I am bound in cha­rity to believe, that some among them do hold those Errors but speculatively, whilst the Truth lies nearer their hearts, and will not suffer them to reduce their own Opinions into practice. Now as to their Errors about Justification, the most that I have read do make Iustification to be an immanent and eternal act of God; Error 1. and do affirm, the Elect were justified before themselves, or the World, had a being. Others come lower, and affirm, the Elect were justified at the time of Christ's death. With these Dr. Crisp harmonizes.

Error II.

That Justification by Faith is no more but a manifestation to us of what was really done before we had a being. Hence Mr. Saltmarsh thus defines Faith. It is (saith he) a being perswaded more or less of Christ's love to us; so that when we believe, that which was hid before, doth then appear. God (saith another) can­not charge one sin upon that man, who be­lieves [Page 320] this truth, That God laid his Iniqui­ties upon Christ.

Error III.

That men ought not to doubt of their Faith, or question, Whether they believe or no. Nay, That we ought no more to question our Faith, than to question Christ. Saltm. Of Free-grace, p. 92, 95.

Error IV.

That Believers are not bound to con­fess Sin, mourn for it, or pray for the forgiveness of it: because it was pardon­ed before it was committed; and par­doned Sin is no Sin. See Eaton's Honey­comb, p. 446, 447.

Error V.

They say, that God sees no Sin in Be­lievers, whatsoever Sins they commit. Some of them, as Mr. Town, and Mr. Eaton, speak out, and tell us, That God can see no Adultery, no Lying, no Blasphemy, no Cozening in Belie­vers: For though Believers do fall into such Enormities; yet all their Sins being pardoned from Eternity, they are no Sins in them. Town's Assertions, 96, 97, 98. Eaton's Honey-comb, chap. 7. p. 136, [Page 321] 137. with others of a more pious Cha­racter than they.

Error VI.

That God is not angry with the Elect, nor doth he smite them for their Sins; and to say that he doth so, is an injurious Reflection upon the Justice of God. This is avouched generally in all their Writings.

Error VII.

They tell us, That by God's laying our Iniquities upon Christ, he became as compleatly sinful as we, and we as compleatly righteous as Christ. Vide Dr. Crisp, p. 270.

Error VIII.

Upon the same ground it is that they affirm, That Believers need not fear ei­ther their own Sins, or the Sins of others; for that neither their own, nor any other mens Sins, can do them any hurt, nor must they do any duty for their own Salvation.

Error IX.

They will not allow the New Cove­nant to be made properly with us, but [Page 322] with Christ for us; and that this Cove­nant is all of it a Promise, having no Condition on our part. They do not ab­solutely deny that Faith, Repentance and Obedience, are Conditions in the New Covenant; but say, They are not Conditions on our part, but Christ's; and that he repented, believed, and obey­ed, for us. Saltmarsh, of Free-grace, p. 126, 127.

Error X.

They speak very slightingly of trying our selves by marks and signs of Grace. Saltmarsh often calls it a weak, low, car­nal way; but the New-England Antino­mians, or Libertines, call it a funda­mental Error, to make Sanctification an evidence of Justification; that it is to light a Candle to the Sun; that it darkens our Justification; and that the darker our Sanctification is, the brighter our Justification is. See their Book, entitled, Rise, Reign. Error 72.

In this Breviate, or summary Account of Antinomian Doctrines, I have only singled out, and touched some of their principal Mistakes and Error, into which some of them run much farther [Page 323] than others. But I look upon such Do­ctrines to be in themselves of a very dan­gerous nature, and the malignity and contagion would certainly spread much farther into the World than it doth, had not God provided two powerful Anti­dotes to resist the malignity.

Viz.
  • 1. The scope and current of Scripture.
  • 2. The experience and practice of the Saints.

(1.) These Doctrines run cross to the scope and current of the Scriptures, which constantly speak of all unregene­rate Persons (without exception of the very Elect themselves, during that state) as Children of wrath, even as others, without Christ, and under condemna­tion

They frequently discover God's An­ger, and tell us his castigatory Rods of affliction are laid upon them for their Sins.

They represent Sin as the greatest Evil; most opposite to the Glory of God, and good of the Saints; and are there­fore filled with Cautions and Threat­nings to prevent their sinning.

[Page 324] They call the Saint frequently and earnestly, not only to mourn for their Sins before the Lord; but to pray for the pardon or remission of them in the blood of Christ.

They give us a far different account of saving Faith, and do not place it in a persuasion more or less of Christ's love to us, or a manifestation in our Consciences of the actual remission of our Sins before we had a being; but in our receiving Christ as the Gospel offers him, for righteousness and life.

They frequently call the People of God to the examination and trial of their Interest in Christ by marks and signs; and accordingly furnish them with va­riety of such marks from the divers parts or branches of Sanctification in them­selves.

They earnestly, and every-where, press Believers to strictness and constancy in the duties of Religion, as the way where­in God would have them to walk. They infer Duties from Privileges; and there­fore the Antinomian Dialect is a wild note, which the generality of serious Christians do easily distinguish from the Scripture-stile and Language.

[Page 325] (2.) The Experience and Practice of the Saints recorded in Scripture, as well as our Contemporaries, or those whose Lives are recorded for our imitation, do greatly secure us from the spreading ma­lignity of Antinomianism. Converse with the living, or read the Histories of dead Saints, and you shall find, That in their Addresses to God, they still bless and praise him for that great and won­derful change of state which was made upon them when they first believed in Christ, and on their believing passed from death to life; freely acknowledging before God, they were before their con­version equal in sin and misery with the vilest Wretches in the World: They heartily mourn for their daily Sins; fear nothing more than Sin; no Afflictions in the World go so near their heart as Sin doth. They mourn for the hardness of their hearts, that they can mourn no more for Sin. They acknowledge the Rods of God that are upon them, are not only the evidences of his displeasure against them for their Sins; but the fruits of their uneven walking with him. And that the greatest of their Afflictions is less than the least of their Iniquities deserve. They fall at their Father's feet [Page 326] as oft as they fall into sin, humbly and earnestly suing for pardon through the Blood of Christ. They are not only sen­sible that God sees Sin in them; but that he seeth such, and so great evils in them, as makes them admire at his patience that they are not consumed in their Iniqui­ties. They find cause enough to suspect their own sincerity: doubt the truth of their Faith, and of their Graces: and are therefore frequent and serious in the trial and examination of their own states by Scripture-marks and signs. They urge the Commands and Threatnings, as well as the Promises, upon their own hearts, to promote Sanctification. Excite themselves to duty and watchfulness a­gainst Sin. They also encourage them­selves by the rewards of obedience, knowing their labour is not in vain in the Lord. And all this while they look not for that in themselves, which is only to be found in Christ: nor for that in the Law, which is only to be found in the Gospel: nor for that on Earth, which is only to be found in Heaven. This is the way that they take. And he that shall tell them, their Sins can do them no hurt, or their Duties do them no good, speaks to them, not only as a Bar­barian, [Page 327] in a Language they understand not, but in such a Language as their Souls detest and abhor.

Moreover, The zeal and love of Christ, and his Glory, being kindled in their Souls, they have not patience to hear such Doctrines as so greatly dero­gate from his Glory, under a pretence of honouring and exalting him. It wounds and grieves their very hearts to see the World hardned in their prejudices a­gainst Reformation, and a gap opened to all licentiousness.

But notwithstanding this double Anti­dote and Security, we find by daily ex­perience such Doctrines too much obtain­ing in the professing World. For my own part, He that searches my Heart and Reins is witness, I would rather chuse to have my right hand wither, and my tongue rot within my mouth, than to speak one word, or write one line to cloud or diminish the Free-grace of God. Let it arise and shine in its Meridian Glo­ry. None owes more to it, or expects more from it, than I do. And what I shall write in this Controversy, is to vin­dicate it from those Doctrines and Opini­ons, which under pretence of exalting it, do really militate against it. To [Page 328] begin therefore with the first and lead­ing Error.

Error I.

That the Iustification of Sinners is an immanent and eternal act of God, not only preceding all acts of sin; but the very ex­istence of the sinner himself, and so per­fectly abolishing sin in our persons, that we are as clean from sin as Christ himself, [...], as some of them have spo­ken. To stop the progress of this Error, I shall,

  • 1. Lay down the Sentence of the Orthodox about it.
  • 2. Offer some Reasons for the refu­tation of it.

(1.) That which I take to be the truth agreed upon, and asserted by sound reformed Divines touching Gospel-Justi­fication, is by them made clear to the World in these following Scriptural di­stinctions of it.

Justification may be considered under a twofold respect or habitude.

  • 1. According to God's Eternal De­cree. Or,
  • 2. According to the execution there­of in time.

[Page 329] (1.) According to God's Eternal De­cree and Purpose; and in this respect Grace is said to be given us in Christ be­fore the World began, 2 Tim. 1. 9. And we are said to be predestinated to the adoption of Children by Jesus Christ, Eph. 1. 5.

(2.) According to the execution there­of in time; So they again distinguish it, by considering it two ways:

  • 1. In its Impetration by Christ.
  • 2. In its Application to us.

That very mercy or privilege of Justi­fication, which God from all Eternity, purely out of his benevolent Love, pur­posed and decreed for his Elect, was al­so in time purchased for them by the death of Christ, Rom. 5. 9, 10. where we are said to be justified by his Blood; and he is said to have made peace through the Blood of his Cross, to reconcile all things to himself, Col. 1. 20. to be deli­vered for our Offences, and raised again for our Justification, Rom. 4. 25. Once more, That God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses, 2 Cor. 5. 19. God the Father had in the death of Christ a foundation of reconciliation, whereby he became [Page 330] propitious to his Elect, that he might absolve and justify them. Again,

(2.) It must be considered in its ap­plication to us, which application is made in this Life at the time of our effectual Calling. When an elect Sinner is united to Christ by Faith, and so passeth from Death to Life, from a state of Condem­nation, into a state of Absolution and Fa­vour; this is our actual Justification, Rom. 5. 1. Acts 13. 39. Iohn 5. 24. which actual Justification is again consi­dered two ways:

  • 1. Universally, and in General, as to the State of the Person.
  • 2. Specially, and Particularly, as to the Acts of Sin.

As soon as we are received into Com­munion with Christ, and his Righteous­ness is imputed by God, and received by Faith, immediately we pass from a state of Death and Condemnation, to a state of Life and Justification, and all Sins al­ready committed, are remitted without Exception or Revocation; and not on­ly so, but a Remedy is given us in the Righteousness of Christ against Sins to come; and tho these special and particu­lar Sins we afterward fall into, do need [Page 331] particular Pardons; yet, by renewed Acts of Faith and Repentance, the Believer applies to himself the Righte­ousness of Christ, and they are par­doned

Again, they carefully distinguish be­twixt.

  • 1. It's Application by God to our Persons. And
  • 2. It's Declaration or Manifestation in us, and to us.

Which Manifestation or Declaration, is either,

  • 1. Private in the Conscience of a Believer. Or,
  • 2. Publick, at the Bar of Judgment.

And thus Justification is many ways distinguished. And notwithstanding all this, it is still actus indivisus, an undi­vided act; not on our part, for it is ite­rated in many acts; but on God's part, who at once decreed it; and on Christ's part, who by one Offering purchased it, and at the time of our Vocation univer­sally applied it, as to the state of the Per­son justified; and that so effectually, as no future Sin shall bring that Person any more under Condemnation.

[Page 332] In this Sentence or Judgment, the Generality of Reformed Orthodox Di­vines are agreed; and the want of distin­guishing, (as they according to Scripture have distinguished) hath led the Anti­nomians into this first Error about Justi­fication, and that Error hath led them into most of the other Errors. That this Doctrine of theirs, (which teaches that Men are justified actually and com­pleatly, before they have a being) is an Error, and hath no solid Foundation to support it, may be evidenced by these three Reasons.

  • 1. Because it is Irrational.
  • 2. Because it is Unscriptural.
  • 3. Because it is Injurious to Christ, and the Souls of Men.

It is Irrational to imagine that Men are actually justified,Reas. 1. before they have a Be­ing, by an immanent Act or Decree of God. Many things have been urged upon this account to confute and destroy this Fancy, and much more may be ra­tionally urged against it. Let the fol­lowing Particulars be weighed in the Ba­lance of Reason.

1. Can we rationally suppose, that Pardon and Acceptance can be affirmed, [Page 333] or predicated of that which is not? Rea­son tells us, Non entis nulla sunt acciden­tia; That which is not, can neither be condemned nor justified: But before the Creation, or before a Man's particular Conception, he was not, and therefore could not in his own Person be the Sub­ject of Justification. Where there is no Law, there is no Sin: Where there is no Sin, there is no Punishment: Where there is neither Sin nor Punishment, there can be no Guilt (for Guilt is an Obliga­tion to Punishment). And where there's neither Law, nor Sin, nor Obligation to Punishment, there can be no Justifi­cation. He that is not capable of a Charge, is not capable of a Discharge. What remains then, but that either the Elect must exist from Eternity, or be justified in time? 'Tis true, future Be­ings may be considered, as in the pur­pose and decree of God from Eternity; or as in the Intention of Christ, who died intentionally for the Sins of the E­lect, and rose again for their Justifica­tion. But neither the Decree of God, nor the Death of Christ, takes place up­on any Man for his actual Justification, until he personally exist. For the Object of Justification is a Sinner actually un­godly, [Page 334] Rom. 4. 5. but so no Man is, or can be from Eternity. In Election, men are considered without respect to Good or Evil done by them, Rom. 9. 11. not so in actual Justification.

2. In Justification there is a Change made upon the state of the Person, Rom. 5. 8, 9. 1 Cor. 6. 9, 10, 11. By Justification men pass from a state of Death to a state of Life, Ioh. 5. 24. But the Decree or Purpose of God in it self makes no such actual change upon the state of any person. It hath indeed the nature of an Universal Cause; but an Universal Cause produ­ceth nothing without particulars. If our state be changed, it is not by an im­manent act of God: Hence no such thing doth transire. A mere velle non punire, or intention to justify us in due time and order, makes no change on our state, till that time come, and the particular Causes have wrought. A Prince may have a purpose or intention to pardon a Law-condemned Traitor, and free him from that Condemnation in due time; but whilst the Law that condemned him stands in its full force and power against him, he is not justified or acquitted, notwithstanding that gracious intention, but stands still condemned. So is it with [Page 335] us, till by Faith we are implanted into Christ. 'Tis true, Christ is a surety for all his, and hath satisfied the debt. He is a common Head to all his, as Adam was to all his Children, Rom. 5. 19. But as the Sin of Adam condemns none, but those that are in him; so the Righ­teousness of Christ actually justifies none but those that are in him; and none are actually in him, but Believers. There­fore till we believe, no actual change pas­seth, or can pass upon our state. So that this Hypothesis is contrary to Rea­son.

As this Opinion is Irrational,Reas. 2. so it is Unscriptural. For (1.) The Scripture fre­quently speaks of Remission or Justifica­tion as a future act, and therefore not from Eternity, Rom. 4. 23, 24. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; but for us also to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him, &c. And Gal. 3. 8. The Scriptures foreseeing that God would justify the Hea­then through faith, preached before the Gospel unto Abraham. The Gospel was preached many years before the Gentiles were justified: but if they were justified from Eternity, how was the Gospel preached before their Justification?

[Page 336] (2.) The Scripture leaves all Unbe­lievers, without distinction, under con­demnation and wrath. The Curse of the Law lies upon them till they believe, Iohn 3. 18. He that believeth on him, is not condemned; but he that believeth not, is con­demned already. And Eph. 2. 3, 12, 13. The very Elect themselves were by nature the Children of wrath even as others. They were at that time, or during that state of nature (which takes in all that whole space betwixt their conception and conversion) without Christ, with­out hope, without God in the World. But if this Opinion be true, that the Elect were justified from Eternity, or from the time of Christ's death; then it cannot be true, that the Elect by nature are Children of Wrath, without Christ, without Hope, without God in the World; except these two may consist to­gether (which is absolutely impossible) that Children of Wrath, without God, Christ, or Hope, are actually discharged from their Sins and Dangers by a free and gracious act of Justification.

But doth not the Scripture say,Object. Rom. 8. 33. Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's Elect? If none can charge the Elect, then God hath discharged them.

[Page 337] God hath not actually discharged them as they are Elect,Sol. but as they are justified Elect: for so runs that Text, and clears it self in the very next words, It is God that justifieth. When God hath actually justified an Elect Person, none can charge him.

(3.) 'Tis cross to the Scripture-order of Justification; which places it not only after Christ's death in the place last cited, Rom. 8. 33. but also after our actual vo­cation, as is plain, vers. 30. Moreover, whom he did predestinate, them he also cal­led; and whom he called, them he also ju­stified; and whom he justified, them he also glorified. Is it absurd to place Vocation before Predestination, or Glorification before Justification? sure then it must be absurd also to place Justification be­fore Vocation: the one as well as the o­ther confounds and breaks the Scripture­order. You may as well say, men shall be glorified, that were never justified; as say they may be justified, before they be­lieved or existed. So that you see the notion of Justification from Eternity, or before our actual existence, and effectual Vocation, is a notion as repugnant to sa­cred Scripture, as it is to sound Reason.

[Page 338] And as it is found repugnant to Rea­son and Scripture,Reas. 3 so it is highly injuri­ous to Jesus Christ, and the Souls of Men.

(1.) It greatly injures the Lord Jesus Christ, and robs him of the glory of be­ing our Saviour. For if the Elect be ju­stified from Eternity, Christ cannot be the Saviour of the Elect, as most assu­redly he is: for if Christ save them, he must save them as persons subject to pe­rishing, either de facto, or de jure. But if the Elect were justified from Eternity, they could in neither respect be subject to perishing: for he that was eternally justified, was never condemned, nor ca­pable of condemnation; and he that ne­ver was, or could be condemned, could never be subject to perishing; and he that never was, nor could be subject to pe­rishing, can never truly and properly be said to be saved.

If it be said, the Elect were not justifi­ed till the death of Christ: I demand then what became of all them that died before the death of Christ? If they were not ju­stified, they could not be glorified: for this is sure from Rom. 8. 30. That the whole number of the glorified in Heaven is made up of such as were justi­fied [Page 339] on Earth: Let men take heed there­fore, lest under pretence of exalting Christ, they bereave him of the glory of being the Saviour of his Elect.

(2.) It bereaves him of another glo­rious Royalty. The Scripture every­where makes our Justification the result and fruit of the meritorious death of Christ, Rom. 3. 24, 25. Rom. 8. 3, 4. 2 Cor. 5. 19, 20. Gal. 3. 13, 14. Eph. 1. 7. But if men were justified from Eter­ternity, how is their Justification the fruit and result of the blood of the Cross? as it plainly appears from these Scriptures to be. Nay,

(3.) This Opinion leaves no place for the satisfaction of Justice by the Blood of Christ for our Sins. He did not die, ac­cording to this Opinion, to pay our debts. And here Antinomianism and Socinianism meet, and congratulate each other. For if there were no debts owing to the Justice of God from Eternity, Christ could not die to pay them: and 'tis manifest there were no debts due to God's Justice from Eternity on the ac­count of his Elect, if the Elect were from Eternity justified; unless you will say, a person may be justified, and yet his debts not paid: for all Justifica­tion [Page 340] dissolves the obligation to punish­ment.

If there were any debts for Christ to pay by his Blood, they must either be his own debts, or the Elect's. To say they were his own, is a blasphemous reproach to him: and according to this Opinion we cannot say they were the Elect's; for if they were justified from Eternity, their debts were discharged, and their bonds cancell'd from Eternity. So that this Opinion leaves nothing to the Blood of Christ to discharge or make satisfa­ction for.

(2.) And as it hath been proved to be highly injurious to the Lord Jesus, so it is greatly injurious to the Souls of men, as it naturally leads them into all those wild and licentious Opinions which na­turally flow from it, as from the radical prolifique Error, whence most of the rest derive themselves, as will immedi­ately appear in the

II. Error.

That Iustification by Faith is no more but the manifestation to us of what was really and actually done before. Or a being persuaded more or less of Christ's love to us. And that when persons do believe, [Page 341] that which was hid before, doth then only appear to them.

Refutation.

As the former Error dangerously cor­rupts the Doctrine of Justification, so this corrupts the Doctrine of Faith; and therefore deserves to be exploded by all Christians.

That there is a manifestation and dis­covery of the special love of God, and our own saving concernment in the death of Christ to some Christians at some times, cannot be denied. St. Paul could say, Gal. 2. 20, 21. Christ loved him, and gave himself for him: but to say that this is the justifying act of Faith, whereby a Sinner passeth from condem­nation and death, into the state of righ­teousness and life; this I must look upon as a great Error, and that for these fol­lowing Reasons.

Reason I.

Because there be multitudes of belie­ving and justified Persons in the World, who have no such manifestation, evi­dence, or assurance, that God laid their Iniquities upon Christ, and that he died to put away their Sins; but daily con­flict [Page 342] with strong fears and doubts, whe­ther it be so or no. There are but few among Believers that attain such a per­suasion and manifestation, as Antinomi­ans make to be all that is meant in Scrip­ture by Justification through Faith. Many thousand new-born Christians live as the new-born Babe, which neither knows its own Estate, or Inheritance, to which it is born, ‘Vivit, & est vitae nescius ipse suae.’

A Soul may be in Christ, and a justified state, without any such persuasion or ma­nifestation, as they here speak of, Isa. 50. 10. And if any shall assert the contrary, he will condemn the greatest part of the Generation of God's Children. Now that cannot be the saving and justifying act of Faith, which is not to be found in multitudes of believing and justified Per­sons.

But manifestation, or a personal persua­sion of the love of God to a Man's Soul, or that Christ died for him, and all his Iniquities are thereby forgiven him, is not to be found in multitudes of believing and justified Souls.

Therefore such a persuasion or ma­nifestation is not that saving, justify­ing [Page 343] Faith, which the Scripture speaks of.

That Faith which only justifies the person of a Sinner before God, must ne­cessarily be found in all justified Believers, or else a man may be justified without the least degree of justifying Faith, and con­sequently it is not Faith alone, by which a man is justified before God.

Reason II.

That cannot be the justifying act of Faith, which is not constant and abiding with the justified Person, but comes and goes, is frequently lost and recovered, the state of the Person still remaining the same. And such contingent things are these persuasions and manifestations; they come and go, are won and lost, the state of the Person still remaining the same. Iob was as much a justified Be­liever when he complained that God was his Enemy, as when he could say, I know that my Redeemer liveth. The same may be said of David, Heman, A­saph, and the greatest number of justified Believers recorded in Scripture. There be two things belonging to a justified state. (1.) That which is essential and inseparable, to wit, Faith uniting the [Page 344] Soul to Christ. (2.) That which is contingent and separable, to wit, evi­dence and persuasion of our interest in him. Those Believers that walk in darkness, and have no light, have yet a real special interest in God as their God, Isa. 50. 10. Here then you find Believers without persuasion or manife­station of God's love to them; which could never be, if justifying Faith con­sisted in a personal persuasion, manife­station or evidence of the love of God, and pardon of Sin to a Man's Soul. That cannot be the justifying Faith spoken of in Scripture, which a justi­fied Person may live in Christ with­out, and be as much in a state of pardon and acceptation with God, when he wants it, as when he hath it. But such is persuasion, evidence, or manifestation of a man's particular interest in the love of God, or the par­don of his Sins. Therefore this is not the justifying Faith the Scripture speaks of.

Reason III.

That only is justifying, saving Faith, which gives the Soul Right and Title to Christ, and the saving benefits which [Page 345] come by Christ upon all the Children of God. Now it is not persuasion that Christ is ours, but acceptance of him, that gives us interest in Christ, and the sa­ving benefits and privileges of the Chil­dren of God, Iohn 1. 12. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God; even to them that believe on his name. So that unless the Antinomians can prove, that receiving of Christ, and personal persuasion of par­don, be one and the same thing; and consequently, that all Believers in the World are persuaded or assured that their sins are pardoned; and reject from the number of Believers all tempted, desert­ed, dark, and doubting Christians; this persuasion they speak of, is not, nor can it be the act of Faith, which justifies the person of a Sinner before God. That which I think led our Antinomians into this Error, was an unfound and unwary definition of Faith, which in their youth they had imbibed from their Catechisms, and other Systems, passing without con­tradiction or scruple in those days, which though it were a mistake, and hath a­bundantly been proved to be so in latter days; yet our Antinomians will not part with a notion so serviceable to the sup­port [Page 346] of their darling Opinion of Eternal Justification.

Reason IV.

A Man may be strongly persuaded of the Love of God to his Soul, and of the pardon of his Sin, and yet have no in­terest in Christ, nor be in a pardoned State. This was the Case of the Phari­sees and others, Luke 18. 9. Rev. 3. 17. Therefore this persuasion cannot be ju­stifying Faith. If a persuasion be that that justifies the persuaded person, then the Pharisees and the Laodiceans were ju­stified. Oh! How common and easie is it for the worst of Men to be strongly persuaded of their good condition; whilst humble serious Christians doubt and stag­ger? I know not what such Doctrine as this is useful for, but to beget and strengthen that sin of presumption, which sends down multitudes to Hell, out of the professing World: For what is more common amongst the most car­nal and unsanctified part of the World, not only such as are meerly moral, but even the most flagitious and prophane, than to support themselves by false per­suasions of their good estate? When they are asked, in order to their con­viction, [Page 347] what hopes of Salvation they have, and how they are founded? Their common answer is, Christ died for Sin­ners, and that they are persuaded, that whatever he hath done for any other, he hath done it for them, as well as others: But such a persuasion cometh not of him that called them, and is of dangerous consequence.

Reason V.

This Doctrine is certainly unfound, because it confounds the distinction be­twixt Dogmatical, and Saving Faith; and makes it all one, to believe an Axiom, or Proposition, and to believe savingly in Christ to Eternal Life. What is it to believe, that God lay'd our iniquities upon Christ, more than the mere assent of the understanding to a Scripture Axi­om or Proposition, without any consent of the will to receive Jesus Christ as the Gospel offers him? And this is no more than what any unregenerated person may do; yea, the very Devils themselves as­sent to the truth of Scripture Axioms and Propositions, as well as Men, Iam. 2. 19. Thou believest there is one God, thou doest well: the Devils also believe and tremble. What is this more than a Scripture-Axi­om [Page 348] or Proposition, God lay'd the iniquity of us all upon Christ, Isa. 53. 6? And yet (saith Dr. Crisp, p. 296.) God cannot charge one Sin upon that Man that be­lieves this Truth, That God lay'd his ini­quities upon Christ. The assent of the understanding may be, and often is given to a Scripture Proposition, whil'st the Heart and Will remain carnal, and ut­terly averse to Jesus Christ. I may be­lieve Dogmatically, that the iniquities of Men were lay'd upon Christ, and persuade my self presumptively, that mine, as well as other Mens, were lay'd upon him, and yet remain a perfect Stranger to all saving Union and Com­munion with him.

Reason VI.

This Opinion cannot be true, because it takes away the only support that bears up the Soul of a Believer in times of temptation and desertion.

For how will you comfort such a di­stressed Soul that saith, and saith truly, I have no persuasion that Christ is mine, or that my sins are pardoned; but I am heartily willing to cast my poor sin-bur­thened Soul upon him, that he may be mine; I do not certainly know that he [Page 349] died intentionally for me, but I lye at his feet, cleave to him, wait at the door of hope; I stay and trust upon him, though I walk in darkness, and have no light. Now let such Doctrine as this be Preach­ed to a Soul in this condition, (and we may be sure 'tis the condition of many thousands belonging to Christ) I say, bring this Doctrine to them, and tell them, That unless they be persuaded of the Love of God, and that God lay'd their iniquities on Christ, except they have some manifestation that their per­sons were justified from eternity, their accepting of Christ, consent of their Wills, waiting at his Feet, &c. signifies nothing; if they believe not that their particular sins were lay'd upon Christ, and are pardoned to them by him, they are still unbelievers, and have no part or portion in him. Whatever pretences of spiritual comfort and relief the Antino­mian Doctrine makes, you see by this, it really deprives a very great, if not the greatest number of God's people of their best and sweetest relief in days of dark­ness and spiritual distress. So that this Doctrine, which makes manifestation and assurance the very essence of justify­ing faith, appears hereby to be both a [Page 350] false and very dangerous Doctrine. And yet there is as much or more danger to the Souls of Men in their

III. Error.

That Men ought not to doubt of their Faith, or question whether they believe or no. Nay, That they ought no more to que­stion their Faith, than to question Christ.

Refutation.

What an easie way to Heaven is the Antinomian way? Were it but as true and safe to the Soul, as it is easie and pleasing to the Flesh, who would not embrace it? What a charm of the Devil is prepared in these two Propositions? Be but persuaded more or less of Christ's Love to thy Soul (saith Mr. Saltmarsh) and that's justifying Faith. Here's a snare of the Devil lay'd for the Souls of Men. And then (2.) to make it fast and sure upon the Soul, and effectually to prevent the discovery of their Error, tell them they need no more to doubt or question their Faith, than to question Christ, and the work is done to all in­tents.

Now that this is an Error, and a very dangerous one, will appear by the follow­ing Reasons.

Reason I.

The questioning and examining of our Faith, is a commanded Scripture­duty, 2 Cor. 13. 5. Examine your selves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves, &c. And 2 Pet. 1. 10. Give di­ligence to make your calling and election sure. Let him that [...]nketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall, 1 Cor. 10. 12. The second Epistle of John, verse 8. Look to your selves, that we lose not the things which we have wrought: With multitude of other Scriptures, recommending holy jealousy, serious self-trial and examina­tion of our Faith, as the unquestionable duties of the people of God. But if we ought to question our Faith no more than we ought to question Christ, away then with all self-examination, and dili­gence to make our Calling and Election sure; for where there is no doubt nor danger, there's no place nor room for examination, or further endeavours to make it surer than it is. How do you like this Doctrine, Christians? How ma­ny be there among you, that find no more cause to question your own faith or interest in Christ, than you do to que­stion whether there be a Christ, or whe­ther [Page 352] he shed his Blood for the remission of any Man's sins.

Reason II.

This is a very dangerous Error, and it is the more dangerous, because it leaves no way to recover a presumptuous Sin­ner out of his dangerous mistakes; but confirms and fixes him in them, to the great hazard of his eternal ruin. It cuts off all means of conviction or better in­formation, and Nails them fast to the carnal state in which they are. Ac­cording to this Doctrine 'tis impossible for a Man to think himself something, when he is nothing; or to be guilty of such a Paralogism and cheat, put by him­self upon his own Soul, Iam. 1. 22. this in effect bids a Man keep on right or wrong; he is sure enough of Heaven, if he be but strongly persuaded that Christ died for him, and he shall come thither at last. Certainly this was not the Counsel Christ gave to the self-deceived Laodiceans, Rev. 3. 17, 18. but instead of dissuading them from self-jealously and suspition of their condition, whether their Faith and State were safe or not, he ra­ther counsels them to buy Eye-salve, that is, to labour after better information of [Page 353] the true state and condition they were in, and not cast away their Souls by false persuasions and vain confidences.

Reason III.

This Doctrine cannot be true, because it supposes every persuasion, or strong conceit of a Man's own heart, to be as infallibly sure and certain, as the very fundamental Doctrine of Christianity. No truth in the World can be surer than this, That Jesus Christ died for Sinners. This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all accep [...]ation, 1 Tim. 1. 15. This is a Foundation stone, a tried, precious Cor­ner-stone, a sure foundation lay'd by God himself, Isa. 28. 16. and shall the strong conceits and confidences of Men's hearts vye and compare in point of certainty with it? As well may probable and meer­ly conjectural Propositions compare with Axioms that are self-evident, or demon­strative Arguments, that leave no doubts behind them. Know we not, that the heart is deceitful above all things, the most notorious cheat and impostor in the World, Ier. 17. 9? Does it not deceive all the formal hypocrites in the World in this very point? And shall every strong conceit and presumptuous confi­dence, [Page 354] begotten by Satan upon a deceit­ful heart, and nursed up by self-love, pass without any examination or suspi­tion for as infallible and assured a truth, as that Jesus Christ came into the World to save sinners? The Lord sweep that Doctrine out of the World by Reforma­tion, which is like to sweep so many Thousand Souls into Hell by a remedi­less Self-deception.

Error IV.

The fourth Antinomian Error before mentioned, was this, That Believers are not bound to confess their sins, or pray for the pardon of them; because their sins were pardoned before they were committed; and pardoned sin is no sin.

Refutation.

If this be true Doctrine, then it will justify and make good such Conclusions and Inferences as these which necessarily flow from it: viz.

  • 1. That there is no Sin in Believers.
  • 2. Or if there be, the evil is very inconsiderable. Or,
  • 3. Whatever evil is in it, it is not the will of God that they should [...]ither confess it, mourn over it, [Page 355] or pray for the remission of it: Whatever he requires of others, yet they need take no notice of it, so as to afflict their hearts for it; God hath exempted them from such concernments: There's nothing but joy to a Believer, saith Mr. Eaton. But neither of these conclusions are either true or tolerable; therefore neither is the principle so which yields them.

(1.) It is not true or tolerable to affirm, that there is no Sin in a Believer, 1 Ioh. 1. 8. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive our selves, and the truth is not in us. There's not a just Man upon earth, that doeth good and sinneth not, Eccles. 7. 20. In many things we offend all, James 3. 2. The Scriptures plainly affirm it, and the universal experience of all the Saints sad­ly confirms it. 'Tis true, the Blood of Christ hath taken away the guilt of Sin, so that it shall not condemn Believers; and the spirit of Sanctification hath ta­ken away the dominion of Sin, so that it doth not reign over Believers; but no­thing, except Glorification, utterly de­stroys the existence of Sin in Believers. The acts of sin are our acts, and not [Page 356] Christ's, and the stain and pollution of those sinful acts, are the burthens and in­felicities of Believers, even in their justi­fied State. Dr. Crisp indeed, p. 270, 271. calls that objection (I suppose he means distinction betwixt the guilt of Sin and Sin it self) a simple objection, and tells us, the very Sin it self, as well as the guilt of it, passed off from us, and was lay'd upon Christ: So that speaking of the Sins of Blasphemy, Murther, Theft, Adultery, Lying, &c. From that time (saith he) that they were lay'd upon Christ, thou ceasest to be a transgressor. If thou hast part in the Lord Christ, all these transgressions of thine become actu­ally the transgressions of Christ. So that now thou are not an Idolater, or Persecu­tor, a Thief, a Murtherer, and an Adulte­rer, thou art not a sinful person; Christ is made that very sinfulness before God, &c. Such expressions justly offend and grieve the hearts of Christians, and expose Chri­stianity to scorn and contempt. Was it not enough that the guilt of our sin was lay'd on him, but we must imagine also, that the thing it self, Sin, with all the deformity and pollution should be essen­tially transferred from us to Christ? No, no. After we are justified, sin dwelleth [Page 357] in us, Rom. 7. 17. warreth in us, and brings us into captivity, ver. 23. Bur­thens and oppresseth our very Souls, v. 24. Methinks I need not stand to prove what I should think no sound experi­enced Christian dares to deny, that there is much sin still remaining in the persons of the justified. He that dares to deny it, hath little acquaintance with the na­ture of Sin, and of his own Heart.

(2.) It is neither true nor tolerable to say there is no considerable evil in the sins of Believers, deserving a mournful con­fession or petition for pardon. The de­sert of Sin is Hell; 'tis an artifice of Satan to draw men to Sin by persuading them there is no great evil in it; but none ex­cept Fools will believe it. Fools, indeed, make a mock of Sin; but all that un­derstand either the intrinsick evil of it, or the sad and dismal effects produced by it, are far from thinking it a light or in­considerable evil. The sins even of Belie­vers greatly wrong and offend their God, Psal. 51. 4. and is that a light thing with us? They interrupt and clog our Com­munion with God, Rom. 7. 21. They grieve the good Spirit of God, Ephes. 4. 30. Certainly these are no inconsiderable mis­chiefs.

[Page 358] (3.) Now if there be sin in Believers, and so much evil in their sins (neither of which any sober Christian will deny) then undoubtedly it is their duty to con­fess it freely, mourn for it bitterly, and pray for the pardon of it earnestly, un­less God have any where discharged them from those Duties, and told them these are none of their concernments, and that he expects not these things from justified persons; but that these are Duties pro­perly and only belonging to other Men. But on the contrary, you find the whole current of Scripture running strongly and constantly in direct opposition to such idle and sinful notions. For first,

(1.) He hath plainly declared it to be his will, that his people should confess their sins before him, and strongly con­nected their Confessions with their Par­dons, 1 Iohn. 5. 9. and frequently su­spends from them the comfortable sense of forgiveness, till their Hearts be brought to this duty, Psal. 32. 5. compared with vers. 3. 4. the more to engage them to this duty by the sensible ease and comfort attending and following it.

(2.) He also enjoyns it upon them, That they mourn for their Sins, Isa. 22. 12. expresses his great delight in con­trition [Page 359] and brokenness of spirit for sin, Isa. 66. 2. To this man will I look, even to him that is poor, and of a contrite spirit. Christ himself pronounces a blessing up­on them that mourn, Matt. 5. 4. Justi­fied Paul mournfully confesses his former blasphemies, persecutions and injuries done against Christ, 1 Tim. 1. 13. So did Ezra, Daniel, and other eximious Saints.

Yes, say some,Object. they did indeed con­fess their sins committed before their ju­stification, but not their after-sins.

According to Antinomian Princi­ples,Reply. I would demand, If all the Elect were justified from Eternity, what sins any of them could confess which they had committed before their Justification? Or if they were justified from the time of Christ's death, what were the Sins any of us have to confess who had not a be­ing, and therefore had not actually sin­ned long after the death of Christ? But I hope none will deny that the mournful complaints the Apostle makes for Sin, Rom. 7. 23, 24. were after he was a sancti­fied and justified person.

(3.) It is not the Will of Christ to exempt any justified person upon Earth, from the Duty of Praying frequently and [Page 360] fervently for the remission of his sins. This the most eminent Saints upon Earth have done. The greatest favourites of Heaven have freely confessed and hearti­ly prayed for the remission of sin, Dan. 9. 4, 19. And that the Gospel gives us no exemption from this Duty, appears by Christ's injunction of it upon all his peo­ple Matt. 6. 12.

Error V.

To give countenance to the former Error, they say, That God sees no sin in Believers, whatsoever sins they commit; and seek a covert for this Error from Numb. 23. 21. and Ier. 50. 20. In the former place it is said by Balaam, He hath not beheld inquity in Iacob, nor seen perverseness in Israel. And in the other place it is said, In those days, and in that time, saith the Lord, the iniquity of Is­rael shall be sought for, and there shall be none; and the sins of Iudah, and they shall not be found: for I will pardon them, whom I reserve.

Refutation.

Now that this Opinion of our Antino­mians is Erroneous, will appear four ways.

  • [Page 361]1. By its repugnancy to God's Om­niscience.
  • 2. By its inconsistency with his Dis­pensations.
  • 3. By its want of a Scripture-foun­dation.
  • 4. By its contradictoriness to their other Principles.

'Tis true, and we thankfully acknow­ledge it, that God sees no Sin in Belie­vers, as a Judge sees Guilt in a Malefa­ctor, to condemn him for it; that's a sure and comfortable truth for us: but to say he sees no Sin in his Children as a displeased Father to correct and chasten them for it, is an Assertion repugnant to Scripture, and very injurious to God. For,

(1.) 'Tis injurious to God's Omnisci­ence, Psal. 139. 2. Thou (saith holy Da­vid) knowest my down-sitting, and my up­rising, and understandest my thoughts of afar off, and art acquainted with all my ways. Job 28. 24. He looketh to the ends of the Earth, and seeth under the whole Heavens. Prov. 15. 3. The Eyes of the Lord are in every place, beholding the evil and the good. Psal. 33. 14, 15. From the place of his habitation he looketh upon all the Inhabi­tants [Page 362] of the Earth; he fashioneth their hearts alike, he considereth all their works. He that denies that God seeth his most secret Sins, therein in consequentially denies him to be God.

(2.) This Assertion is inconsistent with God's Providential Dispensations to his People. When David, a justified Believer, had sinned against him in the matter of Vriah, it is said, 2 Sam. 11. 27. The thing that David had done, dis­pleased the Lord: and as the effect of that displeasure, it's said, Chap. 12. 15. The Lord struck the Child that Uriah's Wife bare unto David, and it was very sick. Among the Corinthians some that should not be condemned with the World, were judged and chastened of the Lord for their undue approaches to his Table, 1 Cor. 11. 32. Now I would ask the An­tinomian these two Questions. (1. Qu.) Whether it can be denied, that David under the Old Testament, and these Co­rinthians under the New, were justified Persons; and yet the former stricken by God in his Child, with its sickness and death; and the latter in like manner smitten by God in their own persons; and both for their respective sins com­mitted against God; and yet God saw [Page 363] no sin in them? Did God smite them for sin, and yet beheld no sin them? Be­ware lest in ascribing such strokes to god, you strike at once both at his Omniscien­cy and Justice. (2. Qu.) How God up­on Confession and Repentance can be said to put away his People's sins (as Na­than there assures David he had done) when in the mean time he saw no sin in him, either to chastise him for, or to pardon in him? Do you think that God's A [...]flictions or Pardons are blind-fold Acts, done at random? how inconsistent is this with Divine Dispensations?

(3.) This Opinion is altogether desti­tute of a Scripture-foundation: 'tis evi­dent it hath none in the only places al­ledged for it. It hath no footing at all in Numb. 23. 21. Grave and learn­ned Gataker hath learnedly and industri­ously vindicated that Scripture from this abuse of it by Antinomians, in his Trea­tise upon that Text, entitled, God's Eye upon his Israel; where after a learned and critical search of the Text, he telleth us, it soundeth word for word thus from the Original: He hath not beheld wrong against Jacob, nor hath he seen grievance against Israel: So that the meaning is not, That God did not see sin in Israel, but that he [Page 364] beheld not with approbation the wrongs and injuries done by others against his Israel; and shews at large by divers solid Reasons, why the Antinomian sense cannot be the proper sense of that place, it being cross to the main tenour of the Story, and truth of God's Word, which shews, that God often complained of their Sins, often threatned to avenge them; yea, did actually avenge them by de­stroying them in the Wilderness; nay, Balaam himself, who uttered these words unto Balak, did not so understand them, as appears by the advice he gave to Ba­lak, to draw them into sin, that thereby God might be provoked to withdraw his protection from them.

And for Ier. 50. 20. it makes nothing to their purpose. Many expound the sin there sought after, and not found, to be the Sin of Idolatry, which Israel should be purged from by their Captivity, ac­cording to Isa. 27. 9. But the generality of sound Expositors are agreed, That by the not finding of Israel's and Iudah's Sin, is meant no more, but his not finding those Bonds or Obligations against them to eternal punishment, which their Sins had put them under.

[Page 365] (4.) In a word, This Opinion clashes with their other Principles. For they say, That though there was pardon and remission under the Old Covenant (which they allowed to be a Covenant of Grace) yet it was but gradatim and successively, as they offered Sacrifices. If a man had sinned ignorantly, until he brought a Sacrifice, his sin lay upon him, it may be a week, a months distance between, be­fore they could have their pardon. Vide Dr. Crisp of the two Covenants, p. 256, 257. Now I demand, If this were the state and case of all God's Israel under the Old Testament, Why do these men af­firm that God can see no sin in a Believer? and why do they expound the words of Balaam so contradictorily to this their o­ther Opinion? For they will not deny but God sees unpardoned Sins in all; and here is a week, or month, or more time, al­lowed between the commission and re­mission of their Sin. And so much of the 5th Antinomian Error.

Error VI.

That God is not angry with the Elect, nor doth he smite them for their Sins; and to say that he doth so, is an injurious reflection upon the Iustice of God, who hath [Page 366] received full satisfaction for all their Sins from the hand of Christ.

There are several Mistakes and Errors in these Assertions; and I suppose our Antinomians were led into them, (1.) By their abhorrence of the Popish Doctrine, which errs more dangerously in the other extream: for they wickedly assert our Sufferings to be satisfactory for our Sins, which is the ground of Popish Penances, and voluntary Self-castigations. (2.) From a groundless apprehension, That God's Corrections of us for our Sins, are incon­sistent with the fulness of Christ's satis­faction for them. Christ having paid all our Debts, and dissolved our Obligations to all punishment, it cannot consist with the Justice of God to lay any Rod upon us for our Sins after Christ hath born all that our Sins deserved.

This mistake of the end of Christ's death, occasions them to stumble into the other Mistakes: they imagine that Christ's Satisfaction abolished God's ha­tred of Sin in Believers. But this cannot be; God's antipathy to Sin, can never be taken away by the Satisfaction of Christ, though his hatred to the Persons of the redeemed be: for the hatred of Sin is founded in the unchangeable Nature of [Page 367] God; and he can as soon cease to be ho­ly, as cease to hate Sin, Hab. 1. 13. Nor was Christ's death ever designed to this end: though Christ hath satisfied for the Sins of Believers, God still hates Sin in Believers. His hatred to their Sins, and love to their Persons, are not inconsistent. As a man may love his Leg or Arm, as they are Members of his own Body, and notwithstanding that love, hate the Gan­grene which hath taken them; and lance or use painful corrosives for the cure of them.

Neither do our Antinomians distin­guish as they ought, betwixt vindictive Punishments from God, the pure issues and effects of his Justice and Wrath a­gainst the Wicked; and his Paternal Ca­stigations, the pure issues of the Care and Love of a displeased Father. Great and manifold are the differences betwixt his vindictive Wrath upon his Enemies, and the rebukes of the Rod upon his Chil­dren. Those are Legal, these Evangeli­cal. Those out of wrath and hatred, these out of love. Those unsanctified, but these blessed and sanctified to happy ends and purposes to his People. Those for destruction, these for salvation.

[Page 368] To narrow the matter in Controversy as much as we can, I shall lay down three Concessions about God's Corrections of his People.

Concession I.

We chearfully and thankfully acknow­ledge the perfection and fulness of the sa­tisfaction of Christ for all the Sins of Be­lievers: and with thankfulness do own, that if God should cast all, or any of them, into an ocean of temporal Trou­bles and Distresses; in all that sea of Sorrow, there would not be found one drop of vindictive Wrath. Christ hath drunk the last drop of that Cup, and left nothing for Believers to suffer by way of satisfaction.

Concession II.

We grant also, That all the Sufferings of Believers in this World, are not for their Sins; but some of them are for the prevention of Sin, 2 Cor. 12. 7. some for the tryal of their Graces, Iam. 1. 2, 3. some for a confirming testimony to his Truths, Act. 5. 41. Such Sufferings as these have much heavenly comfort con­comitant with them.

Concession III.

We do not say, That God's displea­sure with his People for Sin, evidenced against them in the smartest rebukes of the Rod, is any argument that God's love is turned into hatred against their Per­sons: no, no, his love to his People is unchangeable. Having loved his own, he loved them to the end, Iohn 13. 1. yet notwithstanding all this, three things are undeniably clear, and being through­ly apprehended, will end this Con­troversy.

  • 1. That God lays his correcting Rod in this World on the Persons of Believers.
  • 2. That this Rod of God is some­times laid on them for their Sins.
  • 3. That these Fatherly Corrections of them for their Sins, are recon­cileable to, and fully consistent with his Justice, compleatly satis­fied by the Blood of Christ for all their Sins.

1. That God lays his correcting Rod in this World upon the persons of Be­lievers. This no man can have the face to deny that believes the Scriptures to be [Page 370] the Word of God, or that the Troubles of good men in this life fall not out by casualty, but by the counsel and direction of Divine Providence. He that denies the hand of God to be upon the Persons of Believers in this life in the way of painful Chastisements and Sufferings, must either ignorantly, or wilfully, over­look that Scripture, Heb. 7. 8. What Son is he whom the Father chasteneth not? but if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye Bastards, and not Sons. Nor will any sober Christian deny these Troubles of Believers to be the effects of God's governing-Providence in the World, or once imagine or affirm them to be mere Casualties and Contin­gences: for affliction cometh not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground, Job 5. 6. In what Eutopia doth that good man live upon Earth, that feels not the painful Rod of God up­on himself, nor hears the sad laments and moans of other Christians under it! This sure is undeniable, that the Rod of God is every-where upon the Persons and Tabernacles of the Righteous; and if any doubt it, his own sense and feel­ing may in a little time give him a pain­ful demonstration of it.

[Page 371] 2. And for the second, That this Rod of God is sometimes laid upon Believers for their Sins, methinks no sober modest Christian in the World should doubt, or deny it, when he considers, That

  • 1. God himself hath so declared it.
  • 2. The Saints in all Ages have free­ly confessed it to be so.

1. God himself hath fully and plainly declared it to be so, 2 Sam. 12. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Wherefore hast thou despised the Commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight? now therefore the Sword shall never depart from thy House, &c. Here's the Sword, a terrible and painful Evil, upon David's House, a man after God's own heart, and that expresly for his Sin in the matter of Vriah. So Moses, one of the greatest Favourites of Heaven, for his sinful shifting of the Lord's Work, Exod. 4. 13, 14. The anger of the Lord was kindled against Moses: For the multi­tude of thine iniquities, because thy sins were encreased, I have done these things unto thee, saith God to his own Israel, Ier. 30. 15. To instance in all the De­clarations made by God himself in this case, were to transcribe a great part of both Testaments.

[Page 372] 2. And as God hath declared the Sins of his People to be the provoking causes of his rods upon them; so they have free­ly and ingenuously confessed and ac­knowledged the same, Lam. 3. 39, 40. Wherefore doth the living man complain? a man for the punishment of his Sins? Let us search and try our ways, and turn again to the Lord. This was spoken by Ieremy in the name of the whole captive Church. So Psal. 38. 3, 5. There is no soundness in my flesh (saith David) because of thine anger; neither is there any rest in my bones, because of my Sin. My wounds stink, and are corrupt, because of my foolishness. And were it not an hideous and unaccounta­ble thing to hear any Child of God, under his Rod, to stand upon his own justifica­tion, and say, Lord, my Sins have not deserved this at thy hand, nor is it justice in thee thus to chastise me after thou hast received satisfaction for all my Sins from the hand of Christ. Would it not look like an horrid Blasphemy, to hear the best man in the World disputing and de­nying the Justice of God in the troubles he lays him under? For my own part, let the Lord lay on as smartly as he will up­on me, I desire to follow the holy Pat­terns and Presidents recorded in Scrip­ture [Page 373] for my imitation, and to say with the People of God, Ezr. 9. 13. Thou hast punished me less than mine iniquities de­serve. And Mica 7. 9. I will bear the indignation of the Lord, because I have sinned against him. And he that refuses so to do, gives little evidence of the Spi­rit of Adoption in him, but a very clear evidence of the pride and ignorance of his own heart. Iob indeed stifly stood upon his own vindication; but that was when he had to do with men, who falsly charged him, laying those Sins as the causes of his trouble, which he was inno­cent of, Iob 22. 5, 6. But when he had to do with God, he disputes no more, but saith, Behold, I am vile, what shall I an­swer thee? I will lay my hand upon my mouth. q. d. I have done, Father, I have done; Whether these Chastisements be for my Sins or no, sure I am, my Sin not only deserves all this, but Hell it self: Thou art holy, but I am vile.

3. Nor can it at all be doubted, but that these Fatherly Corrections of the Saints for their Sins, are reconcileable to, and fully consistent with his Justice, sa­tisfied by the Blood of Christ for all their Sins. For (1.) If it were not so, the just and righteous God would never have [Page 374] inserted such a clause of reservation in his gracious Covenant with his People, to chasten them as he saw need, after he had taken them into the Covenant, Psal. 89. 30, 31, 32, 33. If they transgress, he will visit their Transgressions with a Rod, and their Iniquity with Stripes; never­theless (saith he) my loving-kindness will I not take away. That [Nevertheless] clearly proves the consistency of his stripes for sin, with his loving-kindness to his People, and with Christ's satisfa­ction for their Sins. (2.) If this were not consistent with the Justice of God, to be sure he would never single them out to spend his Rods upon, rather than o­thers. 'Tis most certain the holiest men have most lashes in this life. Asaph said, Psal. 73. 12, 14. The ungodly prosper in the World, but he was chastned every morning. And vers. 5. The Wicked are not in trou­ble as other men. 1 Pet. 4. 17. Iudgment must begin at the House of God; and if Piety would give men an exemption from all troubles, pains, and chastise­ments, then men might discern love or hatred by the things that are before them, contrary to Eccl. 9. 1, 2. Neither could those that are in Christ suffer the painful Agonies of Death because of sin, [Page 375] expresly contrary to Paul, Rom. 8. 10. And if Christ be in you, the Body is dead because of sin. (3.) In a word, As Christ never shed his Blood to extinguish or abolish God's displeasure against sin in whomsoever it be found, so he never shed it to deprive his People of the mani­fold blessings and advantages that accrue to them by the Rods of God upon them. It was never his intent to put us into a condition on Earth, that would have been so much to our loss. So then, if the hand of God be upon his People for sin, and consistently enough with his Ju­stice, it must be an Error to say, God smites not Believers for their sins, and it would be injustice in him so to do, which is their 6th Error.

Error VII.

They tell us, That by God's laying our Iniquities upon Christ, he became as com­pleatly sinful as we, and we as compleatly righteous as Christ. That not only the guilt and punishment of sin was laid upon Christ; but simply the very faults that men commit, the transgression it self became the trans­gression of Christ: Iniquity it self, not in any figure, but plainly sin it self, was laid on Christ: and that Christ himself was not [Page 376] more righteous, than this Person is, and this Person is not more sinful than Christ was.

Refutation.

These two Propositions will never go down with sound and Orthodox Chri­stians. The first sinks and debases Christ too low, the other exalts the sinful Crea­ture too high. The one represents the pure and spotless Lord Jesus as sinful: the other represents the sinful Creature as pure and perfect: and both these Pro­positions seem evidently to be built upon these two Hypotheses. (1.) That the righteousness of Christ is subjectively and inherently in us, in the same fulness and Perfection it is in Christ: grant that, and then it will follow indeed, That Christ himself is not more righteous than the Believer is. (2.) That not only the guilt and punishment of sin was laid on Christ by way of imputation; but sin it self, the very transgression, or sinfulness it self, was transferr'd from the Elect to Christ: and that by God's laying it on him, the sin­fulness or fault it self was essentially transfused into him; and so sin it self did transire à subjecto in subjectum. Grant but this, and it can never be [Page 377] denied but Christ became as compleatly sinful as we.

But both these Hypotheses are not on­ly notoriously false, but utterly impossi­ble, as will be manifested by and by; But before I come to the Refutation of them, it will be necessary to lay down some Concessions to clear the Orthodox Doctrine in this Controversie, and nar­row the matter under debate, as much as may be.

(1.) And first we thankfully acknow­ledge the Lord Jesus Christ to be the Surety of the New Testament, Heb. 7. 22. and that as such, all the Guilt and Punishment of our Sins, was laid upon him, Isa. 53. 5, 6. That is, God impu­ted, and he bare it in our room and stead. God the Father, as Supreme Law-giver, and Judge of all, upon the Transgressi­on of the Law, admitted the Sponsion or Suretiship of Christ, to answer for the sins of men, Heb. 10. 5, 6, 7. And for this very end he was made under the Law, Gal. 4. 4, 5. And that Christ vo­luntarily took it upon him to answer as our Surety, whatsoever the Law could lay to our charge; whence it became just and righteous that he should suffer.

[Page 378] (2.) We say, That God by laying upon, or imputing the Guilt of our Sins to Christ, thereby our Sins became legally his; as the Debt is legally the Sureties Debt, tho he never borrowed one far­thing of it: Thus God laid, and Christ took our Sins upon him, tho in him was no sin, 2 Cor. 5. 21. He hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin (i. e.) who was clean and altogether void of sin.

(3.) We thankfully acknowledg, that Christ hath so fully satisfied the Law for the sins of all that are his, that the Debts of Believers are fully discharg'd, and the very last mite paid by Christ. His Pay­ment is full, and so therefore is our Dis­charge and Acquittance, Rom. 8. 1, 31. And that by virtue hereof the Guilt of Believers is so perfectly abolished, that it shall never more bring them under Con­demnation, Iohn 5. 24. And so in Christ they are without fault before God.

(4.) We likewise grant, That as the Guilt of our Sins was by God's Imputa­tion laid upon Christ, so the Righteous­ness of Christ is by God imputed to Be­lievers by virtue of their Union with Christ; and becomes thereby as truly and fully theirs, for the justification of their [Page 379] particular Persons before God, as if they themselves had in their own Persons ful­filled all that the Law requires, or suffer­ed all that it threatned: No inherent Righteousness in our own Persons, is, or can be more truly our own for this end and purpose, than Christ's imputed Righteousness is our own. He is the Lord our Righteousness, Jer. 23. 6. We are made the righteousness of God in him, 1 Cor. 5. 21. Yea, the righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in them that believe, Rom. 8. 4.

But notwithstanding all this, we can­not say, (1.) That Christ became as compleatly sinful as we. Or (2.) That we are as compleatly righteous as Christ; and that over and above the Guilt and Punishment of Sin, (which we grant was laid upon Christ) Sin it self simply considered, or the very Transgression it self, became the Sin or Transgression of Christ; and consequently that we are as compleatly Righteous as Christ, and Christ as compleatly Sinful as we are.

1. We dare not say, That Sin simply consider'd, as the very Transgression of the Law it self, as well as the Guilt and Punishment, became the very Sin and Transgression of Christ: For two things [Page 380] are distinctly to be considered and diffe­renced, With respect to the Law, and un­to Sin. As to the Law, we are to consider in it,

  • 1. Its Preceptive part.
  • 2. Its Sanction.

(1.) The preceptive part of the Law, which gives Sin its formal Nature, 1 Ioh. 3. 4. For sin is the transgression of the law. All Transgression arises from the Preceptive part of the Law of God: He that transgresseth the Precepts, sinneth; and under this consideration sin can ne­ver be communicated from one to ano­ther: The Personal sin of one cannot be in this respect the Personal sin of ano­ther: There is no Physical Transfusion of the Transgression of the Precept from one subject into another: This is utterly impossible; even Adam's personal sins consider'd in his single private capacity, are not communicable to his Posterity.

(2.) Besides the Transgression of the Preceptive part of the Law, there is an obnoxiousness unto Punishment, arising from the Sanction of the Law, which we call the Guilt of Sin; and this (as Ju­dicious Dr. Owen observes) is separable from sin:Owen of Justificati­on, p. 285. And if it were not separable from the former, no sinner in the world [Page 381] could either be pardoned or sav'd: Guilt may be made another's by Imputation, and yet that other not rendred formally a sinner thereby: Upon this ground we say, the Guilt and Punishment of our Sin, was that only which was imputed unto Christ; but the very Transgression of the Law it self, or Sin formally and essen­tially consider'd, could never be com­municated or transfused from us into him. I know but two ways in the world by which one man's sins can be imagined to become another's, viz. Either by Im­putation, which is Legal, and what we affirm; or by Essential Transfusion from subject to subject (as our Adversaries fancy) which is utterly impossible; and we have as good ground to believe the absurd Doctrine of Transubstantiation, as this wild notion of the Essential Transfusion of Sin. Guilt arising from the Sanction of the Law, may and did pass from us to Christ by Legal Imputa­tion; but sin it self, the very Transgres­sion it self, arising from the very Precep­tive part of the Law, cannot so pass from us to Christ: For if we should once ima­gine that the very acts and habits of sin, with the odious deformity thereof, should pass from our Persons to Christ, and sub­jectively [Page 382] to inhere in him, as they do in us; then it would follow,

First, That our Salvation would thereby be rendred utterly impossible. For such an inhesion of Sin in the Person of Christ, is absolutely inconsistent with the Hypostatical Vnion, which Union is the very Foundation of his Satisfaction, and our Salvation. Tho the Divine Na­ture can, and doth dwell in Union with the pure and Sinless human Nature of Christ, yet it cannot dwell in Union with Sin.

Secondly, This Supposition would render the Blood of the Cross altogether unable to satisfie for us. He could not have been the Lamb of God to take away the Sins of the World, if he had not been perfectly pure and spotless, 1 Pet. 1. 19.

Thirdly, Had our Sins thus been es­sentially transfus'd into Christ, the Law had had a just and valid Exception against him; for it accepts of nothing but what is absolutely pure and perfect. I admire, therefore, how any good Man dares to call our Doctrine which teaches the Imputati­on of our Guilt and Punishment to Christ, a simple Doctrine; and assert, that the Transgression it self became Christ's; and that thereby Christ became as compleatly sinful as we. And,

[Page 833] Fourthly, If the way of making our Sins Christ's by imputation, be thus re­jected and derided; and Christ asserted by some other way to become as com­pleatly sinful as we; then I cannot see which way to avoid it, but that the very same Acts and Habits of Sin must inhere, both in Christ, and in Believers also. For, I suppose our Adversaries will not deny that, notwithstanding God's laying the Sins of Believers upon Christ, there remain in all Believers after their Justification, sinful Inclinations and Aver­sations; a Law of Sin in their Members, a Body of Sin and Death. Did these things pass from them to Christ, and yet do they still inhere in them? Why do they complain and groan of in-dwel­ling Sin? as Rom. 7. If Sin it self be so transferr'd from them to Christ? Sure, unless Men will dare to say, the same Acts and Habits of Sin which they feel in themselves, are as truly in Christ as in themselves; they have no ground to say, that by God's laying their Iniquities upon Christ, he became as compleatly sinful as they are; and if they should so affirm, that Affirmation would under­mine the very Foundation of their own Salvation.

[Page 384] I therefore heartily subscribe to that sound and holy Sentence, of a clear and learned Divine,Owen, Of Justificati­on, p. 283. Nothing is more absolute­ly true, nothing more sacredly and assured­ly believ'd by us, than that nothing which Christ did or suffer'd, nothing that he un­dertook, or underwent, did, or could con­stitute him subjectively, inherently, and thereupon personally a Sinner, or guilty of any Sin of his own. To bear the Guilt or Blame of other Mens Faults, to be alienae culpae reus, makes no Man a Sinner, unless he did unwisely or irregularly undertake it. So, then this Proposition, that by God's laying our Sins upon Christ (in some o­ther way, than by Imputation of Guilt and Punishment) he became as compleat­ly sinful as we, will not, ought not to be receiv'd as the sound Doctrine of the Go­spel. Nor yet this

Second Proposition.

That we are as compleatly Righteous as Christ is; or, that Christ is not more Righte­ous than a Believer.

I cannot imagine what should induce any Man so to express himself, unless it be a groundless conceit and fancy, that there is an essential Transfusion of Christ's justifying Righteousness into Be­lievers, [Page 385] whereby it becomes theirs by way of subjective inhesion, and is in them in the very same manner it is in him: And so every individual Believer becomes as compleatly Righteous as Christ. And this conceit they would fain establish upon that Text, 1 Ioh. 3. 7. He that doth righteousness, is righteous, even as he is righteous.

But neither this expression, nor any other like it in the Scriptures, gives the least countenance to such a general and unwary Position. It is far from the mind of this Scripture, That the righte­ousness of Christ is formally and inherent­ly ours, as it is his. Indeed it is ours relatively, not formally and inherently; not the same with his for quantity, though it be the same for verity. His Righte­ousness is not ours in its Vniversal va­lue, though it be ours, as to our particu­lar use and necessity. Nor is it made ours to make us so many causes of Salvation to others; but it is imputed to us as to the Subjects, that are to be saved by it our selves.

'Tis true, we are justified, and saved by the very Righteousness of Christ, and no other; but that Righteousness is for­mally inherent in him only, and is only [Page 386] materially imputed to us. It was actively his, but passively ours. He wrought it, though we wear it. It was wrought in the person of God-man for the whole Church, and is imputed (not transfused) to every single Believer for his own con­cernment only. For,

(1.) It is most absurd to imagine that the Righteousness of Christ should for­mally inhere in the person of all, or any Believer, as it doth in the person of the Mediator. The impossibility hereof ap­pears plainly from the incapacity of the Subject. The Righteousness of Christ is an Infinite Righteousness, because it is the Righteousness of God-man, and can therefore be subjected in no other person beside him. It is capable of being im­puted to a finite creature, and therefore in the way of imputation we are said to be made the righteousness of God in him: but though it may be imputed to a finite creature, it inheres only in the person of the Son of God, as in its proper subject. And indeed,

(2.) If it should be inherent in us, it could not be imputed to us as it is, Rom. 4. 6, 23. Nor need we go out of our selves for justification, as now we must, Phil. 3. 9. but may justify our [Page 387] selves by our own inherent Righteous­ness. And

(3 dly,) What should hinder, if this Infinite Righteousness of Christ were in­fused into us, and should make us as compleatly righteous as Christ; but that we might justify others also, as Christ doth: and so we might be the Saviours of the Elect, as Christ is? Which is most absurd to imagine. And

(4 thly,) According to Antinomian Principles, What need was there that we should be justified at all? Or, what place is left for the justification of any sinner in the World? For according to their Opinion, the justification of the Elect is an immanent act of God before the World was; and that Eternal act of Ju­stification, making the Elect as compleat­ly Righteous as Christ himself, there could not possibly be any the least guilt in the Elect to be pardoned; and conse­quently no place, or room could be left for any Justification in time. And then it must follow, that seeing Christ died in time for sin, according to the Scrip­tures; It must be for his own sins that he died, and not for the sins of the Elect; Diametrically opposite to Rom. 4. 25. and the whole current of Scripture, and faith of Christians.

[Page 388] 'Tis therefore very unbecoming and unworthy of a justified person, after Christ hath taken all his guilt upon him­self, and suffer'd all the punishment due thereunto in his place and room: In­stead of an humble and thankful admi­ration of his unparallel'd grace therein, to throw more than the guilt and pu­nishment of his sins upon Christ, even the transgression it self: and comparing his own Righteousness with Christ's, to say he is as compleatly Righteous as Christ himself. This is as if a company of Bankrupt Debtors Arrested for their own Debts, ready to be cast into Prison, and not having one Farthing to satisfy, after their Debts have been freely and fully discharg'd by another, out of his immense treasure; should now compare with him, yea, and think they honour'd him, by telling him, that now they are as compleatly Rich as himself.

I am well assur'd no good Man would embrace an Opinion so derogatory to Christ's Honour as this is; did he but see the odious consequences of it, doubt­less he would abhor them as much as we. And as for those now in Heaven, who fell into such mistakes in the way thither, were they now acquainted with what is [Page 389] transacted here below, they would ex­ceedingly rejoyce in the detection of those mistakes, and Bless God for the refuta­tion of them.

Error VIII.

They affirm, That Believers need not fear their own sins, nor the sins of others; for as much as neither their own, or others sins can do them any hurt, nor must they do any duty for their own good, or salvation or for eternal rewards.

That we need fear no hurt from sin, or may not aim at our own good in Du­ty, are two Propositions that sound harsh in the ears of Believers: I shall consider them severally, and refute them as brief­ly as I can.

Proposition I.

Believers need not fear their own sins, or the sins of others; because neither our own, or others sins can do us any hurt.

They seem to be induced into this Er­ror, by misunderstanding the Apostle, in Rom. 8. 28. as if the scope of that Text were to assert the benefits of sin to justi­fied persons; whereas he speaks there of Adversities and Afflictions befalling the Saints in this Life. Vniversalis restrin­genda [Page 390] est ad materiam subjectam, loquitur enim de afflictionibus piorum. The sub­ject matter (saith Pareus on the place) restrains the Universal expression of the Apostle: For when he there saith, All things shall work together for good; he principally intends the afflictions of the Godly, of which he treats there in that context. It may be extended also to all providential events; Omnia quaecunque eis accedunt forinsecus, tam adversa, quàm prospera: All adverse and prosperous events of things without us, as Estius upon the place notes. Nothing is spo­ken of sin in this Text. And the Apo­stle distributing this General into Parti­culars, verse 38. plainly shews, what are the things he intended by his Universal expression, verse 28. as also in what re­spect no creature can do the Saints any hurt, namely, that they shall never be able to separate them from the love of God, which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. And in this respect it is true that the Sins of the Elect shall not hurt them, by frustra­ting the purpose of God concerning their Eternal Salvation; or totally and finally to separate them from his Love. This we grant, and yet we think it a very un­wary, and unsound expression, That Be­lievers [Page 391] need not fear their own sins, be­cause they can do them no hurt: 'Tis too general and unguarded a Proposition to be received for truth. What if their sins cannot do them that hurt, to frustrate the purpose of God, and Damn them to Eternity in the World to come? Can it therefore do them no hurt at all in their present state of conflict with it in this World? For my part, I think the great­est fear of caution is due to sin, the great­est evil; and that Chrysostome spake more like a Christian, when he said, Nil nisi peccatum timeo, I fear nothing but sin. Though sin cannot finally ruine the Be­liever, yet it can many ways hurt and injure the Believer; and therefore ought not to be misrepresented as such an inno­cent and harmless thing to them. In vain are so many terrible threatnings in the Scriptures against it, if it can do us no hurt; and it is certain nothing can do us good, but that which makes us better, and more Holy: But Sin can ne­ver pretend to that, of all things in the World. But to come to an issue, Sin may be consider'd three ways.

  • 1. Formally.
  • 2. Effectively.
  • 3. Reductively.

[Page 392] First, Formally, as a transgression of the Preceptive part of the Law of God, and under that consideration it is the most formidable evil in the whole World. The evil of evils, at which every gra­cious heart trembles, and ought rather to chuse Banishment, Prison, and Death it self in the most terrible form, than Sin, or that which is most tempting in Sin, the pleasures of it; as Moses did, Heb. 11. 25.

Secondly, Sin may be consider'd Ef­fectively, with respect to the manifold mischiefs and calamities it produceth in the World, and the Spiritual and Cor­poreal Evils it infers upon Believers themselves: Though it cannot Damn their Souls, yet it makes War against their Souls, and brings them into mise­rable Bondage and Captivity, Rom. 7. 23. It wounds their Souls, under which wounds they are feeble and sore broken; yea, they roar by reason of the disquiet­ness of their hearts, Psal. 38. 5, 8. Is War, Captivity, Festering painful Wounds, causing them to roar, no hurt to Belie­vers? It breaks their very Bones, Ps. 51. 8. And is that no hurt? It draws off their Minds from God, interrupts their Prayers and Meditations, Rom. 7. 18, 19, 20, 21. [Page 393] And is there no hurt in that? It causeth their Graces to decline, wither, and languish to that degree, that the things which are in them are ready to die, Rev. 3. 1. and Rev. 2. 4. And is the loss of Grace and Spiritual strength, no hurt to a Believer? It hides the Face of God from them, Isa. 59. 2. And is there no hurt in spiritual withdrawments of God from their Souls? Why then do de­serted Saints so bitterly lament and be­moan it? It provokes innumerable af­flictions and miseries, which fall upon our Bodies, Relations, Estates; and if Sin be the cause of all these inward and outward miseries to the People of God, sure then there is some hurt in Sin, for which the Saints ought to be afraid of it.

Thirdly, Sin may be consider'd Redu­ctively, as it is over-ruled, reduced, and finally issued by the Covenant of Grace. Under this consideration of sin, which rather respects the future, than present state, the Antinomians only respect the hurt, or evil of it; over-looking both the former considerations of sin, which con­cern the present state of Believers, and so rashly pronounce, sin can do Believers no hurt. An Assertion tending to a great [Page 394] deal of looseness and licentiousness. A Man drinks deadly Poison, and is after many months recover'd by the skill of an excellent Physician; shall we say, there was no hurt in it, because the man died not of it: sure those fearful twinges he felt, his loss of strength and stomach, were hurtful to him, tho he escaped with life, and got this advantage by it, to be more wary for ever after. Tantum Re­ligio potuit suadere malorum.

And then for other mens sins, (which they say we need not fear) 'tis an Asser­tion against all the Laws of Charity. For the sins of wicked men eternally damn them: Disturb the Peace and Or­der of the World: Draw down Natio­nal Judgments upon the whole Commu­nity: Cause Wars, Plagues, Persecu­tions, &c. Which Considerations of the sins of others, opened fountains of tears in David's Eyes, Psal. 119, 136. caused horror to take hold upon him, vers. 53. And yet if you will believe the Antinomian Doctrine, Believers have no need to fear, much less be in horror (which is the extremity of fear) for other mens sins. How is Satan gratified, and temptations to sin strengthned upon the Souls of men, by such indistinct, un­wary, [Page 395] and dangerous Expressions as these are? A good Intention can be no sufficient salvo for such Assertions as these.

Secondly, ‘They tell us, That as the Saints need fear no sin for any hurt it can do them, so they must do no duty for their own good; or with an eye to their own Salvation, or Eternal Re­wards in Heaven.’

Refutation.

This, as the former, is too generally and indistinctly deliver'd. He that distin­guisheth well, teacheth well. The con­founding of things which ought to be di­stinguish'd, easily runs men into the bogs of Errors. Two things ought to have been distinguish'd here:

in Duties.
  • 1. Ends
  • 2. Self-ends

First, Ends in Duty; There are two ends in Duties: one supream and ulti­mate, viz. the glorifying of God, which must, and ought to take the first place of all other ends. Another secondary and subordinate, viz. the good and benefit of our selves. To invert these, and place our own good in the room of God's [Page 396] Glory, is sinful and unjustifiable; and he that aims only at himself in Religion, is justly censured as a mercenary Servant, especially if it be any external good he aims at; but spiritual good, especially the enjoyment of God, is so involv'd in the other, viz. the glory of God, that no man can rightly take the Lord for his God, but he must take him for his Su­pream Good, and consequently therein may, and must have a due respect to his own happiness.

Secondly, Self-ends must also be di­stinguished into

  • 1. Corrupt, or carnal Self-ends.
  • 2. Pure and spiritual Self-ends.

As to carnal and corrupt Self-ends, in­viting and moving men to the perfor­mance of Religious Duties: when these are the only Ends men aim at, they be­wray the Hypocrisy of the Heart: and accordingly God charges Hypocrisy up­on such Persons, Hosea 7. 14. They have not cried unto me with their heart, when they howled upon their Beds: they assemble themselves for Corn and Wine, &c. God reckons not the most solemn Duties ani­mated by such Ends, to be done unto him, Zech. 7. 5. Did ye at all fast to me?

[Page 397] But beside these, Man hath a best self, a spiritual self, to regard in duty, viz. The conformity of his Soul to God in holiness, and the perfect fruition of God in glory. Such holy Self-ends as these, are often commended, but no­where condemned in Scripture. 'Twas the Encomium of Moses, That he had respect unto the recompence of reward, Heb. 11. 26. These ordinate respects to our spiritual best self, are so far from being our sin, that God both appoints and al­lows them for great uses and advantages to his People in their way to glory. They are (1.) Singular Encouragements to the Saints under Persecution, Streights and Distresses, Heb. 10. 34. And to that end Christ proposes them, Luke 12. 32. And so the best of Saints have made use of them, 2 Cor. 4. 17, 18. (2.) They are Motives and Incentives to Praise and Thankfulness, 1 Pet. 1. 3, 4. 1 Coloss. 12. (3.) They stir up the Saints to chearful and vigorous industry for God, Col. 3. 23, 24. 1 Cor. 15. 58.

Now to cut off from Religion all these spiritual and excellent Self-respects, and to make them our sins, and marks of our Hypocrisy, is an Error very injuri­ous to the Gospel, and to the Souls of [Page 398] Men. For (1.) it crosses the strain of the Gospel, which commands us to strive for our Salvation, Luk. 13. 24, 25. Phil. 2. 12. 1 Tim. 4. 16. (2.) It blames that in the Saints as sinful, which the Scripture notes as their excellency, and records to their praise, Heb. 11. 26. (3.) It makes the Laws of Christianity to thwart and cross the very fundamental Law of our Creation, which inclines and obliges all men to intend their own Felicity. And on this account, not only our Antinomians are blame-worthy, but o­thers also, who are far enough from their Opinion, who urge humiliation for sin beyond the Staple: teaching men, they are not humbled enough till they be con­tent to be damned. (4.) It unreasona­bly supposes a Christian may not do that for his own Soul, which he daily doth, and is bound to do for other mens Souls, viz. to pray, preach, exhort and reprove for their Salvation.

Error IX.

‘They will not allow the New Covenant to be properly made with us, [...] but with Christ for us. And some of them af­firm, That this Covenant is all of it a Promise, having no Condition upon our [Page 399] part. They acknowledge indeed Faith, Repentance and Obedience, to be Condi­tions, but say they are not Conditions on our part, but on Christ's; and conse­quently affirm, That he repented, belie­ved, and obeyed for us.’

Refutation.

(1.) The confounding of distinct Co­venants, leads them into this Error; we acknowledge there was a Covenant pro­perly made with Christ alone, which we call the Covenant of Redemption. This Covenant indeed, though it were made for us, yet it was not made with us. It had its Condition, and that Condition was laid only upon Christ: viz. That he should assume our Nature, and pour out his Soul unto death, which Condition he was solely concerned to perform; but beside this, there is a Covenant of Grace made with him, and with all Believers in him: with him primarily as the Head, with them as the Members, who perso­nally come into this Covenant, when they come into union with him by Faith. This Covenant of Grace is not made with Christ alone, personally considered, but with Christ, and all that are his, mysti­cally considered, and is properly made [Page 400] with all Believers in Christ; and there­fore it is called their Covenant, Zech. 9. 11. As for thee also, by the blood of thy Co­venant I have sent forth thy Prisoners out of the Pit wherein is no water. So when God entred into the Covenant of Grace with Abraham, Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my Covenant (saith he) between me and thee, thy Seed after thee. So when he took the People of Israel into this Co­venant, Ezek. 16. 8. I sware unto thee (saith he) and entred into a Covenant with thee, and thou becamest mine.

This Covenant of Grace made with Believers in Christ, is not the same, nor must it be confounded with the Cove­nant of Redemption made with Christ be­fore the World began. They are two distinct Covenants; for in the Covenant of Grace, into which Believers are ta­ken, there is a Mediator, and this Medi­ator is Christ himself; but in the other Covenant of Redemption there neither was, nor could be any Mediator, which manifestly distinguishes them. Besides, In the Covenant of Grace Christ be­queaths manifold and rich Legacies, as he is the Testator; but no man gives a Legacy to himself. This Covenant is really and properly made with every Be­liever [Page 401] as he is a Member of Jesus Christ the Head; and they are truly and pro­perly federates with God: the Covenant binds them to their Duties, and encoura­ges them therein by promises of strength to be deriv'd from Christ to enable them thereunto.

(2.) We thankfully acknowledge, That the glory of the New Covenant is chiefly discovered in the Promises there­of: upon the best Promises it is establish­ed. And all the Promises are reducible to the Covenant. They meet, and center in it as the Rivers in the Sea, or Beams in the Sun. But yet we cannot say, that nothing but Promises is contain'd in this Covenant: for there are Duties requi­red by it, as well as Mercies promised in it.

Nor may we say, That those Duties required by it, are required only to be performed by Christ, and not by us; but they are required to be performed by us in his strength. Nor is it Christ that re­pents, and believes for us, but we our selves are to believe and repent in the strength of his Grace. And till we do so actually in our own persons, we have no part or portion in the Blessings and Mer­cies of this Covenant. If Christ by be­lieving [Page 402] for us, give us an actual Right and Title to the Promises and Blessings of the New Covenant, then it will una­voidably follow,

(1.) That men, who never repented for one sin in all their lives, may be, nay, certainly are pardoned as much as the greatest Penitents in the World; because though they never repented themselves, yet Christ repented for them: expresly contrary to his own words, Luke 13. 3. Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. And contrary to his own established Or­der, Luke 29. 47. Acts 3. 19.

(2.) It will also follow, That Unbe­lievers, who never had union with Christ by one vital act of Faith in all their lives, may be, nay certainly shall be saved, as well as those that are actual Believers: because though they be Unbelievers in themselves, yet Christ believed for them: expresly contrary to Mark 16. 16. He that believeth not, shall be damned. John 3. 36. He that believeth not the Son, shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. And Luke 12. 46. He will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with unbelievers.

(3.) It will also follow from hence, That men may continue in a state of dis­obedience [Page 403] all their days, and yet may be sav'd as well as the most obedient Souls in the World: expresly contrary to Eph. 5. 6. Let no man deceive you with vain words; for because of these things, cometh the wrath of God upon the Children of dis­obedience. And Rom. 2. 8. But unto them that are contentio [...]s, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indigna­tion, and wrath. And 1 Pet. 4. 17. What shall the end of them be that obey not the Gospel of God!

This Language sounds strange and harsh to the Ears of Christians; a re­penting Christ saving the impenitent Sinner: A believing Christ saving Unbelievers: An obeying Christ sa­ving obstinate and disobedient Wretches. Whither doth such Doctrine tend, but to encourage and fix men in their impe­nitence, unbelief, and disobedience? But the Lord grant no poor Sinner in the World may trust to this, or build his hopes of Eternal Life upon such a loose, sandy foundation as this is. Reader, All that Christ hath done without thee, will not, cannot be effectual to thy Salvation, unless Repentance, Faith and Obedience be wrought by the Spirit in thy Soul. 'Tis Christ in thee that is the hope of glory, [Page 404] Col. 1. 27. Beware therefore on what ground thou buildest for Eternity.

Error X.

‘They deny Sanctification to be the evi­dence of Iustification; and deridingly tell us, This is to light a Candle to the Sun; and the darker our Sanctification is, the brighter our Iustification is.’

Refutation.

I am not at all surprized at this strange and absonous Language. 'Tis a false and dangerous Conclusion, yet such as natu­rally results from, and by a kind of ne­cessity follows out of their other Errors. For if the Elect be all justified from Eter­nity, and that neither Repentance, Faith or Obedience be required of us in the Co­venant of Grace; but were all required of, and performed by Christ, who re­pented, believed, and obeyed for us; then indeed I cannot understand what relation our Sanctification hath to our Justification; or how it should be an evi­dence, mark or sign thereof: or what regard is due from Christians to any Grace or Work of the Spirit wrought in them, to clear up their Interest in Christ to them. For we being in Christ, [Page 405] and in state of Justification, before we were naturally born, we must necessarily be so before we be regenerated, or new­born; and consequently, no work of Grace wrought in us, or holy Duties per­formed by us, can be evidential of that which from Eternity was done before them, and without them.

(1.) I grant indeed, That many vain Professors do cheat and deceive them­selves by false unscriptural signs and evi­dences, as well as by true ones misap­plied.

(2.) I grant also, That by reason of the deceitfulness of the Heart, instabili­ty of the Thoughts, similar works of common Grace in Hypocrites, Distra­ctions of the World, Wiles of Satan, weakness of Grace, and prevalency of Corruptions: the clearing up of our Ju­stification by our Sanctification, is a work that meets with great and manifold Dif­ficulties, which are the things that most Christians complain of.

(3.) I also grant, That the evidence of our Sanctification in this, or any other method, is not essential, and absolutely necessary to the being of a Christian. A man may live in Christ, and yet not know his interest in him, or relation to [Page 406] him, Isa. 50. 10. Some Christians, like Children in the Cradle, live, but under­stand not that they live: are born to a great Inheritance, but have no know­ledge of it, or present comfort in it.

(4.) I will further grant, That the Eye of a Christian may be too intently fixed upon his own gracious qualification; and being wholly taken up in the reflex Acts of Faith, may too much neglect the direct Acts of Faith upon Christ, to the great detriment of his Soul.

But all this notwithstanding, The ex­amination of our Justification by our San­ctification, is not only a lawful, and pos­sible, but a very excellent and necessary work and duty. 'Tis the course that Christians have taken in all Ages. And that which God hath abundantly blessed to the joy and encouragement of their Souls.

He hath furnished our Souls to this end with noble self-reflecting Powers and Abilities. He hath answerably fur­nished his Word with variety of marks and signs for the same end and use. Some of these marks are exclusive to detect and bar bold presumptuous Pretenders, 1 Cor. 6. 9. Rev. 21. 8, 27. Some are inclusive marks, to measure the strength [Page 407] and growth of Grace by, Rom. 4. 20. And others are positive signs, flowing out of the very essence of Grace, or the New-Creature, 1 Iohn 4. 13. Hereby we know that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit.

He hath also expresly commanded us to examine and prove our selves: up­braided the neglectors of that duty, and enforced their duty upon them by a thun­dring Argument, 2 Cor. 13. 5. Examine your selves whether ye be in the faith, prove your own selves; know ye not your own selves, how that Iesus Christ is in you, ex­cept ye be Reprobates. In a word, For this end and purpose, amongst others, were the Scriptures written, 1 Iohn 5. 13. These things have I written to you, that believe on the name of the Son of God, that ye may know that ye have eternal life. And there­fore to neglect this duty, is exceeding dangerous; but to deny, and deride it, intolerable. It may justly be feared, such men will be drown'd in perdition, who fall into the waters, by making a bridge over them with their own shadows.

For my own part, I verily believe that the sweetest hours Christians enjoy in this World, is, when they retire into their Closets, and sit there concealed from all [Page 408] eyes, but him that made them; looking now into the Bible, then into their own Hearts, and then up to God: closely fol­lowing the grand Debate about their In­terest in Christ, till they have brought it to the happy desired issue.

And now, Reader, for a close of all, I call the Searcher of Hearts to witness, That I have not intermedled with these Controversies of Antipaedobaptism, and Antinomianism, our of any delight I take in Polemical Studies, or an unpeaceable contradicting Humour, but out of pure zeal for the Glory and Truths of God, for the vindication and defence whereof, I have been necessarily ingaged therein. And having discharged my duty thus far, I now resolve to return (if God will permit me) to my much sweeter and more agree­able Studies; Still maintaining my Christi­an Charity for those whom I oppose; not doubting but I shall meet those in Hea­ven, from whom I am forced in lesser things to dissent and differ upon Earth.

FINIS.

GOSPEL-UNITY Recommended to the CHURCHES OF CHRIST: IN A SERMON Preached by I. F. Author of the Foregoing DISCOURSE. FROM I COR. I. 10. ‘Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ, That ye all speak the same thing; and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind, and in the same judgment.’

WHEN I consider this Healing and Uniting Text, and the scandalous Divisions of the Congre­gations to which I recommend it, I could chuse rather to comment thereon with Tears, than Words. 'Tis just mat­ter of lamentation, to think what feeble influences such Divine and Pathetical Ex­hortations have upon the minds and [Page 410] hearts of professed Christians. But it is not Lamentations, but proper Counsels, and convictions obey'd, must do the work.

The Primitive and Purest Churches of Christ, consisted of imperfect Members, who notwithstanding they were knit to­gether by the same internal bond of the Spirit, and the same external bonds of common Profession, and common Dan­ger, and enjoyed extraordinary helps for uniting, in the Presence and Doctrine of the Apostles among them; yet quickly discovered a Schismatical Spirit, dividing both in Judgment and Affection, to the great Injury of Religion, and Grief of the Apostle's Spirits. To check and heal this growing-Evil in the Church at Co­rinth, the Apostle addresses his Patheti­cal Exhortation to them, and to all fu­ture Churches of Christ, whom it equal­ly concerns, in the words of my Text. Now I beseech you, brethren, &c. Where note

  • 1. The Duty exhorted to.
  • 2. The Arguments enforcing the Duty.

1. The Duty exhorted to; namely, Unity; the Beauty, Strength, and Glo­ry, as well as the Duty of a Church. This Unity he describes two ways, 1. As it is Exclusive of its opposite, Schism or Division. All Rents, and rash Separa­tions, [Page 411] are contrary to it, and destructive of it: I beseech you, brethren, that there be no Divisions [or Schisms] among you. 2. As it is inclusive of all that belongs to it; namely, the Harmony and Agree­ment of their Judgments, Hearts, and Language. (1.) That ye all speak the same thing. (2.) That ye be perfectly joined together in one Mind. And (3.) In the same Judgment. This threefold U­nion in Judgment, Affection, and Lan­guage, includes all that belongs to Chri­stian Concord, makes the Saints [...], men of one Heart and Soul, the loveliest sight this World affords, Acts 2. 46, 47.

(2.) The Arguments enforcing this Duty upon them, comes next under con­sideration. And these are Three. (1.) I beseech you. (2.) I beesech you, Brethren. (3.) I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ. These Argu­ments are not of equal Force and Effica­cy: The first is great: The second great­er: The last the most efficacious, and ir­resistible, of all the rest: But all together should come with such Power, and irre­sistible Efficacy upon the Judgments, Consciences, and Hearts of Christians, as should perfectly knit them together, and defeat all the Designs of Satan, and his A­gents, [Page 412] without them, or of their own Cor­ruptions within them, to rend asunder their Affections or Communion.

And first,Arg. 1. he enforces the Duty of Uni­ty by a solemn Apostolical Obsecration and Adjuration; I beseech you, saith he; he had Power to command them to this Duty, and threaten them for the neglect of it: He had in readiness to revenge all Disobedience, and might have shaken that Rod over them; but he chuseth ra­ther to intreat and beseech them: Now I beseech you, Brethren: Here you have, as it were, the great Apostle upon his knees before them, Meekly and Patheti­cally entreating them to be at perfect U­nity among themselves. 'Tis the intreaty of their Spiritual Father, that had begot­ten them to Christ. Now [I] beseech you, brethren, I who was the Instru­ment in Christ's hand, of your Conver­sion to him: I, that have planted you a Gospel-Church, and assiduously watered you: I beseech you by all the spiritual tyes and endearments betwixt me and you, that there be no Divisions among you. This is the first Argument, wrapt up in a solemn Obsecration.

Next, he enforces the Duty of Unity, by the nearness of their Relation; I be­seech [Page 413] you, Brethren: Brotherhood is an endearing thing, and naturally draws Affection and Unity with it, 1 Pet. 3. 8. Be ye all of one mind; having compassion one of another; love as brethren; be piti­ful, be courteous; ye are the children of one Father, joint-heirs of one and the same inheritance. To see an Egyptian smiting an Israelite, is no strange sight; but to see one Israelite quarrelling another, is most unnatural and uncomely: The nearer the Relation, the stronger the Af­fection: How good and how pleasant is it, (saith the Psalmist) for Brethren to dwell together in Vnity! Psal. 133. 1.

But the greatest Argument of all is the last, viz. In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ. In this name he beseeches and in­treats them to be at perfect Unity among themselves. In the former he sweetly in­sinuated the duty by a loving compellation, but here he sets it home by a solemn Ad­juration; I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ: That is to say, (1.) For Christ's Sake, or for the Love of Christ; by all that Christ hath done, suffered, or purchased for you; and as Christ is dear and precious to you, let there be no Divisions. If you have any Love for Christ, don't grieve him, and [Page 414] obstruct his great design in the world, by your Scandalous Schisms. Mr. Iohn Fox never denied a Beggar that asked an Alms of him, for Christ [...]esus Sake.

2. In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ; that is, in the Authority of Christ; for so his Name also signifies, 1 Cor. 5. 4. and it is as if he had said, If you reverence the Supreme Authority and Soveraignty of Christ, which is the Fountain out of which so many solemn Commands of Unity do flow; then see, as you will an­swer it to him at the Great Day, that ye be perfectly joined together in one Mind, and in one Judgment. The Point will be this:

DOCT.

Vnity amongst Believers, especially in par­ticular Church-Relation, is as desirable a Mercy, as it is a necessary and indi­spensable Duty.

How desirable a Mercy it is, and how necessary a Duty, let the same Apostle, who presseth it upon the Corinthians in my Text, be heard again, enforcing the same Duty with the same warmth, upon the Church at Philippi, chap. 2. v. 1, 2. If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fel­lowship [Page 415] of the spirit, if any bowels of mer­cies, fulfil ye my joy, that ye be like-minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind. In handling this Point, I will shew,

  • 1. What Unity among Believers is.
  • 2. How the necessity and desirableness of it, may be evinced.
  • 3. And then lay down the Motives and Directions about it.

(1.) What Unity amongst Believers is, and more particularly such Believers as stand in particular Church-Relation to each other.

There is a twofold Union, one Mysti­cal, betwixt Christ and Believers; ano­ther Moral, betwixt Believers themselves: Faith knits them all to Christ, and then Love knits them one to another. Their common relation to Christ their Head, endears them to each other as Fellow-Members in the same Body. Hence they become Sanguine Christi conglutinati; Glued together by the Blood of Christ. Union with Christ is fundamental to all Union among the Saints. Perfect Union would flow from this their common Uni­on with Christ their Head, were they not here in an imperfect state, where their [Page 416] corruptions disturb and hinder it; and as soon as they shall attain unto com­pleat Sanctification, they shall also attain unto perfect Unity. How their Unity with one another comes by way of ne­cessary resultancy from their Union with Christ; and how this Unity among themselves shall at last arise to its just perfection, that one Text plainly disco­vers, Iohn 17. 23. I in them, and thou in me; that they may be made perfect in one,&c.

Unity amongst those that hold not the Head, is rather a Conspiracy, than a Gospel-unity. Believers and unbelievers may have a Political or Civil union; but there's no Spiritual unity, but what flows from joint-membership in Christ. I will not deny, but in particular Churches there may be, and still are some Hypo­crites, who hold Communion with the Saints, and pretend to belong unto Christ, the same Head with them; but as they have no real Union with Christ, so nei­ther have they any sincere affection to the Saints; and these for the most part, are they that raise tumults and divisions in the Church, as disloyal Subjects do in the Commonwealth. Of these the Apostle speaks, 1 Ioh. 2. 19. They went out from [Page 417] us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us; but they went out, that it might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

Sincere Christianity holds fast the Soul by a firm bond of Life to the truly Chri­stian Community, wherein they reap those spiritual pleasures and advantages which assure their continuance therein to a great degree: But those that joyn with the Church upon carnal and exter­nal inducements, make little conscience of rending from it; and God permits their Schismatical Spirits thus to act, for the discovering of their Hypocrisy, or (as the Text speaks) that it might be made manifest they were not of us; as also that they which are approved, may by their constancy be also made manifest, 1 Cor. 11. 19.

It hath indeed been said, That it's ne­ver better with the Church, than when there are most Hypocrites in it; but then you must understand it only with respect to the external tranquillity and prosperi­ty of the Church; for as to its real, spi­ritual advantage, they add nothing: And therefore it behoves Church-Offi­cers and Members to be exceeding careful [Page 418] (especially in times of Liberty and Pro­sperity) how they admit Members, as the [...] Solomon [...] time were of admitting Proselytes. 'Tis said, Amos 3. 3. How can two walk together except they be a­greed? I deny not but persons that differ in some lesser points as to their Judg­ment, may, and ought to be one in Af­fection: But of this I am sure, that when Sanctified persons, agreed in Judg­ments and Principles, do walk together under pious and judicious Church-offi­cers, in tender affection, and the exer­cise of all duties tending to mutual edifi­cation, glorifying God with one mouth, Rom. 15. 6. and cleaving together with oneness of heart, Acts 2. 42. This is such a Church-unity as answers Christ's end in the [...]stitution of particular Churches, and greatly tends to their own comfort, and the propagation of Chri­stianity in the World. Tongue-unity flows from Heart-unity; Heart-unity, in a great measure, from Head-unity; and all three from Union with the Lord [...]esus Christ. The divisions of our Tongues come mostly from the divisions of our Hearts; were Hearts agreed, Tongues would quickly be agreed; And then what ble [...]ed times might be expect­ed? [Page 419] And so much briefly for the nature of Unity. Next,

(2.) Let us evince both the necessity and desirableness of this Unity among Believers; and this will appear in a three­fold respect: viz.

  • 1. With respect to the Glory of God.
  • 2. The Comfort and Benefit of our own Souls.
  • 3. The Conversion and Salvation of the World.

(1.) With respect to the Glory of God. The manifestative Glory of God (which is all the Glory we are capable of giving him, is the very end of our Being, and should be dearer to us than our Lives) is exceedingly advanced by the Unity of his people. Hence is the A­postle's Prayer, Rom. 15. 5, 6. Now the God of patience and consolation, grant you to be like minded one towards another, ac­cording to Christ Iesus, that you may with one mind and one mouth glorify God. 'Tis highly remarkable, That the Apostle in this Petition for the Unity of the Saints, doth not only describe that Unity he [Page 420] prays for, one Mouth and one Mind, and shews how much God would be glo­rified by such an Union; but he also ad­dresses himself to God for it, under these two remarkable Titles, the God of pa­tience and consolation; thereby intima­ting two things; (1.) How great need and exercise there is of patience, in main­taining Unity among the Saints: They must bear one another's burthens; they must give allowance for mutual infirmi­ties: For the Church here is not an As­sembly of Spirits of just Men made per­fect. The Unity of the Saints therefore greatly depends upon the exercise of Pa­tience one towards another; and this he begs the God of Patience to give them. And to endear this Grace of Patience to them, He (2.) joyns with it another Title of God, viz. the God of Consola­tion, wherein he points them to that a­bundant comfort which would result un­to themselves from such a blessed Unity continued and maintained by the mu­tual exercises of patience and forbearance one towards another. And to set home all, he lays before them the pattern and example of Christ; The God of patience and consolation grant you to be like minded according to Christ. How many Thou­sand [Page 421] infirmities and failures in Duty, doth Christ find in all his people? Not­withstanding which, he maintaineth Uni­on and Communion with them; and if they, after his example, shall do so like­wise with one another, God will be emi­nently glorified therein. This will evi­dence both the Truth and Excellency of the Christian Religion, which so firmly knits the hearts of its Professors toge­ther.

(2.) Secondly, The necessity and de­sirableness of this Unity farther appears, by the deep interest that the comfort and benefit of our Souls have in it. A great example hereof we have in Acts 2. 46, 47. Oh! what cheeriness, strength, and pleasure, did the Primitive Christi­ans reap from the Unity of their Hearts in the ways and worship of God? Next unto the pleasure and delight of imme­diate Communion with God himself, and the shedding abroad of his Love in­to our Hearts by the Holy-Ghost; none like that which ariseth from the harmo­nious exercises of the graces of the Saints in their mutual Duties and Communions one with another. How are their Spi­rits dilated and refreshed by it? What [Page 422] a lively emblem is here of Heaven! the Courts of Princes afford no such delights. Whereas on the other side, when Schisms have rent Churches a-sunder, they go away from each other exasperated, grie­ved and wounded, crying out, Oh, that I had a Cottage in the Wilderness! or, oh! that I had the Wings of a Dove, that I might flee away, and be at rest

(3.) Lastly, The necessity and desire­ableness of this Union further appears with respect unto the World, who are allured to Christ by it, and scared off from Religion by the feuds and divisions of Professors. To this the Prayer of Christ hath respect, Ioh. 17. 23. That they may be made perfect in one, that the world may know that thou hast sent me. q. d. This, O Father, will be a convin­cing evidence to the World, of the Di­vinity both of my Person and Doctrine, and a great ordinance for their conversion to me, when they shall see my people cleaving inseparably unto me by Faith, and to one another by Love. And on the other side, it will be a fatal stum­bling-block in the way of their conver­sion, to observe my followers biting and devouring, rending and tearing one ano­ther.

[Page 423] A Learned and Judicious Divine Com­menting upon those words,Mr. Iohn Cotton. Cant. 2. 7. I charge you, O ye daughters of Ierusalem, by the Roes, and by the Hinds of the field, that ye stir not up, nor awake my love till [...]e please; gives the sense thus; By Roes and Hinds of the Field (saith he) un­derstand weak comers on towards Christ, persons under some preparatory works towards Conversion, who are as shy and as timorous as Roes and Hinds of the Field; and as they will be scared by the yelp of a Dog, or sound of a Gun; so will these at any offensive miscarriages in the Churches of Christ.

Alexander Severus, finding two Chri­stians contending with one another, com­manded them that they should not pre­sume to take the name of Christ upon them any longer; for (saith he) you greatly dishonour your Master, whose Disciples you profess your selves to be. And thus briefly of the nature of Church-unity, and the necessity and desirable­ness thereof among all that stand in that Relation.

VSE.

The only improvement I shall make of this point, shall be for,

  • [Page 424]1. Exhortation to Unity.
  • 2. Directions for the maintaining of it.

The first Vse for Exhortation. Use 1.

And first, having briefly discoursed the nature, necessity and desireableness of Unity among all Christians, and e­specially of those in particular Church-relation, I do in the Bowels of Christ, and in the words of his Apostle, Phil. 2. 1, 2. earnestly and humbly intreat all my Brethren, That if there be any conso­lation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the spirit, if any bowels of mercies, fulfil ye my joy; that ye be like­minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind. He speaketh not as one doubting; but as one disputing, when he saith, If there be any consolation in Christ: And 'tis as if he had said, I passionately and earnestly intreat you by all that comfort and joy you have found in your mutual Communion from Christ, and his Ordinances, wherein you have comfortably walked together, by all that comfort resulting from the mutual exercises, and fruits of Chri­stian Love; by the unspeakable joys and delights the Spirit of God hath shed [Page 425] down upon you, whilst you walked in Unity, in the ways of your Duty; by all the bowels of compassion and mercy you have for your selves, for your Bre­thren, or for the poor carnal World, who are in hazard of being destroyed by your divisions: Or for me, your Mini­ster, whose joy and comfort is bound up in your unity and stability; That ye be like minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind. What heart that hath one spark of the Love of Christ in it, yields not to such an Exhortation as this, enforced by the consolation of Christ, comfort of Love, fellowship of the Spirit, and Bowels of Mercy? More particularly, suffer ye this word of Exhortation from the consideration of the following Argu­ments or Motives, what distances so­ever you are at from one another.

Motive 1.

Reflect upon the late long and continu­ed troubles you have been under, as the just rebukes of God for your former contentions and follies.

I need not tell you, you are but late­ly pluck'd as brands out of the burning, and that the smell of Fire is yet upon [Page 426] you. The time lately was, when you gat your Bread with the peril of your lives; when God handed it to you be­hind your Enemies backs; when your eyes did not, could not behold your former Teachers, except in Corners or Prisons, when your Souls were sorrow­ful for the solemn Assemblies; when you mournfully confessed before the Lord, that these were the just and deserved punishments for your wantonness, bar­renness, and provoking animosities. These things were not only the matter of your humble confessions; but the reformation of those evils was what you solemnly promised the Lord, when he should a­gain restore you to your liberty. What! And is the Rod no sooner off your backs, but you will to the old work again? Read Ezra 9. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. and view the face of this Sin in that glass. Have we been so many years in the furnace, and our dross not purged? Such sharp and long-continued afflictions produce no better effects? It may be said of our troubles, as of the Siege of Tyrus, Ezek. 29. 18. Every head was made bald, and every shoulder peeled. Some of us went young Men into persecution and trouble, and are come forth old; and which is [Page 427] worst of all, we bring our old corrup­tions forth with us. Either we did con­fess and bewail these sins in the days of our affliction, or we did not. If we did not, we were incorrigible, and defeated the design of the Rod. If we did, our Confessions and Sorrow were either sin­cere or hypocritical: If sincere, certain­ly they would effectually caution us, that we return not again to folly, Ezra 9. 13, 14. After all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that thou, our God, hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve; and hast given us such a deliverance as this; Should we again break thy Commandment?

Motive II.

Consider the common imminent dan­ger that now threatens us, both from Enemies upon our Borders, and within our own Bowels. The Canaanites are in the Land, let there be no strife there­fore betwixt Brethren; our natural, ci­vil, and spiritual comforts are all shaking and trembling about us. If wanton Children fall out and quarrel at a full Table, our Enemies stand ready to take away the Cloth. They are not so far from us, and out of sight, but God can [Page 428] call them in a few hours to end the strife amongst us. We act not only beneath the Rules of Religion, but of Reason also. Brute creatures will depose their very Antipathies in a common danger. Mr. Tho. Fuller, in his History of the Worthies of England, tells us, That when the Severn-Sea overflowed the lower Grounds of Somersetshire, it was observed that Dogs and Hares, and Cats and Rats, swimming to the Burroughs and Hills to preserve their lives, stood quiet during the Flood; not offering the least injury one to another. 'Tis pity that sense should do more with Beasts, than Reason and Religion with Men.

Motive III.

Reflect upon the scandal your divi­sions give to the World; how it hard­dens and prejudices them against Reli­gion and Reformation. And thus the Souls of Men are eternally hazarded by the follies of Professors: They are ready enough to take occasions against Religi­on, where none are given, and much more to improve them where occasions are given. Wo unto the world (saith Christ) because of offences: for it must needs be that offences come; but wo to that [Page 429] man by whom the offence cometh, Matt. 18.

7. The wo is not only denounced a­gainst the taker, but the giver of the of­fence. It fixes such prejudices in the hearts of carnal Men, that some of them will never have good thoughts of Reli­gion any more; but utterly distast and nauseate those Assemblies and Ordinan­ces from which their Conversion may with greatest probability be expected.

How long and how anxiously have we prayed, and waited for such a day of Gospel-liberty as we now enjoy? It hath been one of the sorest afflictions we have grapled with in the days of our restraint, that we could not speak unto the carnal World. If we had opportunity to speak at all, it was for the most part to such as stood in need of Edification more than of Conversion. God hath now, beyond thoughts of most hearts, opened to us a door of Liberty to Preach, and for all that will, to hear. Some fruits we have already seen, and more we expect. The Children are as it were coming to the birth, and will you obstruct it? Will you give the Gospel a miscarrying-womb? Be instruments at once, by your contentions, to destroy the Souls of Men, and break the very hearts of your Mini­sters, [Page 430] whose greatest comfort is bound up in the success of their Labours? Bre­thren, I beseech you read these words as if they were delivered to you upon my bended knees; I beseech you for the Lord Jesus Christ's sake, and for the hopes sake of saving the precious immor­tal Souls of Men; and for your poor Ministers sake, who have scarce any thing besides the fruits of their Labours, to recompence their long-continued and grievous sufferings, depose your animosi­ties, maintain the unity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace; help us, but don't hinder us in our hard labours. What good will our Lives do us, if we must labour in vain, and spend our strength for nought? We find it difficult enough to persuade sinners to come unto Christ, when no such stumbling-blocks are laid in the way; the counter-pleas of Satan, the unbelief and sensualities of unsancti­fied nature, are difficulties too great for us to grapple with; but if to these must be added prejudices against Religion, from your dividing Lusts, and scanda­lous Breaches, what hope then remains? If you have no pity for your selves, pity perishing Souls, and pity your poor dis­couraged Ministers; have a care you [Page 431] make us not to groan to God against you; or if that be a small thing in your eyes, have a care lest the Blood of Souls be charged to your account in the great day. Are there none in the Towns or Neighbourhoods where you live? Are you sure there are none that have hope­ful inclinations towards Religion? de­sires and purposes to attend on the same means of Grace you sit under, who will charge the occasion of their Damnation upon you at the Bar of Christ, and say, Lord, we had some weak convictions upon our Consciences, that we needed a rouzing and searching Minister; we were convinced that the profane and car­nal World, among whom we had our conversation, were not in the right path that leadeth to Salvation. We felt in our selves inclinations to cast off our old Companions, and associate with those that professed more strictness and holi­ness, and place our selves under the most fruitful and advantagious Ministry, and accordingly improved opportunities to get acquaintance with them; but when we came nearer to them, we found such wrath and envy, such wranglings and divisions, such undermining and sup­planting each others reputation; such [Page 432] whisperings and tale-bearings, such ma­licious aggravations and improvements of common failings and infirmities, such covetousness and worldliness, such pride and vanity, as gave us such a disgust and offence at the ways of Reformation, that we could never more be reconciled to them. Beware, I say, how you incur the guilt of such a dreadful charge as this, by giving liberty to such Lusts and Pas­sions under a profession of Religion, and pretence to Reformation.

Motive IV.

Consider the contrariety of such Pra­ctices to that solemn and fervent Prayer of Jesus Christ, recorded in Iohn 17. 'Tis highly remarkable, how in that Prayer, which he poured out a little be­fore his death with such a mighty Pathos, and fervency of Spirit, he insists upon nothing more than Unity among his Peo­ple. He returns upon his Father again and again, for the obtaining of this one thing: Four times doth he beg for Unity among them, and every time he seems to rise higher and higher, beseeching his Father, (1.) That they may be one. (2.) That they may be one in us. (3.) That they may be one as thou and I are one. and lastly, That they may be made [Page 433] perfect in one; By all this shewing how intent his Spirit was upon this one thing.

Brethren, If you would study how to frustrate the design, and grieve the Heart of your Lord Jesus Christ (to whom you profess love and obedience) you cannot take a readier way to do it, than by breaking the bonds of Uni­ty among your selves. I beseech you therefore in the name of our Lord Je­sus Christ, who hath so earnestly pray­ed for the unity of his People, That ye be perfectly joined together in one heart, and in one mind, as the Text speaks.

Motive V.

Consider how directly your Divisions cross and frustrate the Design and End of Church-fellowship which is instituted for the improvement of each other's Graces, and helping on the mortification of each other's Corruptions.

God hath distributed variety of gifts and graces in different degrees amongst his People; the improvement of these gifts and graces to the glory of God, and our mutual edification, is the very scope and end of particular Church-fel­lowship [Page 434] and Communion: every man hath his proper gift of God, and (as a late Worthy notes) the gifts and graces of all,Torshell's help to Christian-fellowship p. 6, 7. are this way made useful and be­neficial. Iob was exemplary for plain­ness and patience: Moses for faithful­ness and meekness: Iosieh for tender­ness, and a melting Spirit: Athanasius was prudent and active: Basil heavenly, and of a sweet Spirit: Chrysostom labori­ous, and without affectation: Ambrose resolved and grave. One hath quickness of parts; but not so solid a Judgment: Another is solid, but not ready and pre­sential. One hath a good Wit, another a better Memory, a third excells them both in utterance. One is zealous, but ungrounded; another well principled, but timorous. One is wary and prudent; another open and plain-hearted. One is trembling and melting; another chearful, and full of comfort. Now the end and use of Church-fellowship is to make a rich improvement unto all by a regular use and exercise of the gifts and graces found in every one. One must impart his light, and another his warmth. The Eye (viz. the knowing man) cannot say to the hand (viz. the active man) I have no need of thee. Unspeakable are the benefits resul­ting [Page 435] from spiritual and orderly Commu­nion; but whatever the benefits be, they are all cut off by Schisms and Dissentions; for as Faith is the grace, by which we receive all from God; so Love is the grace by which we share and divide the comfort of all among our selves. The excellent things of the Spirit are lodg'd in earthen Vessels, which death will shortly break, and then we can have no more benefit by them; but these Jars and Divisions render Saints, as it were, dead one to another, whilst they are alive. Ah how lovely, how sweet and desirable it is to live in the communion of such Saints as are described! Mal. 3. 16. To hear them freely, and humbly to open their hearts and experiences to one another! After this manner, some say, the art of Medicine was found out: As any one met with an Herb, and discovered the virtue of it by any Accident, he was to post it up, and so the Physicians skill was perfected by a collection of those posted Experiments. But wo to us! we are ready to post up each other's Failings and Infir­mities to the shame and reproach of Re­ligion, and to furnish our common Ene­mies with matter of contempt and scorn against us all.

Motive VI.

In a word, These Schisms and Dissen­tions in the Churches of Christ are omi­nous presages, and foreboding signs of some sweeping Judgment, and common Calamity near approaching us. 'Tis a common observation with Shepherds, That when the Sheep push one another, a storm speedily ensues. I am sure 'tis so here, if God turn not our hearts one towards another, he will come and smite the Earth with a Curse, Mal. 4. 6. I be­lieve it, Sirs, you will have other work to do shortly. There be those coming, (if God prevent not) that will part the fray.

VSE II▪ Vse 2. for Direction.

In the last place therefore give me leave to lay before you some necessary and proper Directions and Counsels for the prevention and healing of Schisms and Divisions amongst the Churches of Christ: for it is not Complaints and La­mentations, but proper Counsels and Di­rections; and those not only prescribed, but obeyed, that must do the work. When Ioshua lay upon his face before the Lord, Ioshua 7. 8, 9, 10. bewailing [Page 437] the sins and miseries of Israel; Vp(saith God)sanctify the people; wherefore liest thou upon thy face? As if he should say, Thy moans and lamentations are good and necessary in their place; but speedy action and vigorous endeavours must be also used, or Israel will perish. So say I, up, up, fall speedily to your duties as men in earnest; and for your guidance in the paths of duty, I will lay before you the following plain and neces­sary Directions.

Direction I.

The orderly gathering, and filling of particular Churches, is of great influence unto the peace and tranquillity of those Churches: and therefore it greatly con­cerns all that are interested therein, espe­cially such as are vested with Office-power to beware whom they receive in­to their Communion.

The Scriptures do plainly discover to us, that Church-members ought to be vi­sible Saints, 1 Cor. 1. 2. 2 Cor. 1. 1, 2. Acts 2. 41, to the end. Ephes. 2. 7. 1 Thes. 1. 2, 3. Rom. 1. 7. Col. 1. 2. Hence par­ticular Churches are called the Churches of the Saints, 1 Cor. 14. 33. If admis­sions belax and negligent, so much hete­rogeneous [Page 438] matter fills the Church, that it can never be quiet. Christians and Chri­stians may live together harmoniously and coalesce in one orderly and comforta­ble Society, as having one and the same Head, one Spirit, the same general De­sign and End; but godly and ungodly, spiritual and carnal are acted by contrary Principles, pursue opposite Designs, and can never heartily coalesce. There is a spirit of discerning, a judgment of dis­cretion in the Saints, and it is especially desirable in a more eminent degree in those that have Office-power in the Church, to judge of mens fit qualifica­tions for Church-communion. We all al­low, that gross ignorance and prophane­ness are just bars to mens admission: and to deny this, were to take all power from the Church to preserve the purity of God's Ordinances, or to cast out no­torious Offenders. None ought to be admitted into Church-communion, but such as do appear to the judgment of Charity (comparing their Professions and Conversations) to be Christians indeed, that is, men fearing God, and working Righteousness.

And I make no doubt, but some Opi­nions as well as practices, render men [Page 439] unmeet for Church-communion, Tit. 3. 10. 2 Iohn 10. All Opinions which over­throw Doctrines necessary to be believed, which the Apostle comprehends under the name of Faith; and all such Opini­ons as are inconsistent with an holy Life, and overthrow the power of Godliness, which the Apostle comprehends under the name of a good Conscience, 1 Tim. 1. 19, 20. whosoever shall hold or maintain any such Opinions as these, he is either to be kept out, if not admitted; or cast out, if he be in Church-fellowship. In receiving such, you receive but Spies and Incendiaries among you. What a Fire-brand did Arius prove, not only in the Church of Constantinople, but even to the whole World? Men of graceless Hearts, and erroneous Heads, will give a continual exercise to the patience of So­ber Christians. I deny not but out of the purest Churches men may arise speaking perverse things; and yet the Officers and Members of those Churches be blameless in their admission: But if they can be discerned before they be admitted, a lit­tle preventive care would be of singular and seasonable use to the tranquillity of Church-Societies.

Direction II.

Let all Officers and Members of Church study their Duties, and keep themselves within the bounds of their proper places. Ordinate Motions are quiet Motions, 1 Thes. 4. 11. Study to be quiet, and do your own business, and work with your own hands, as we command­ed you. In which words he condemns two vices, which disturb and distract the Churches of Christ, viz. Curiosity in matters which pertain not to us, and Idleness in the Duties of our particular Callings. Two things I will drop by way of Caution:

(1.) Let it be for Caution to Ministers that they mind their proper work,A Doctore glorioso, à pastore contentio­so & in­utilibus Questio­nibus libe­ret Eccle­siam Deus. Luther's Prayer. study the Peace of the Church, impartially di­spense their respects to the Saints com­mitted to their charge, not siding with a Party. There be few Schisms in Churches, in which Ministers have not some hand. Ierome upon those words, Hosea 9. 8. hath this memorable note; Veteres scrutans historias, invenire non possum scidisse Ecclesiam, praeter eos qui Sacerdotes a Deo positi fuerunt. Searching the Ancient Histories (saith he) I can find none that hath more rent the Church [Page 441] of God, than those that sustain the Of­fice of Ministers. This is a sad charge, and 'tis too justly laid upon many of that Order: Oh what a Blessing is a Prudent, Patient, Peaceable Minister, to the Flock over which he watches!

(2.) Let the People keep their places, and study their proper Duties. There be in most Congregations, some idle people, who having little to do at home, are employed upon Satan's Errands to run from house to house, carrying tales to exasperate on Christian against ano­ther. These the Apostle particularly marks, and warns the Churches of, 1 Tim. 5. 13. And withal they learn to be idle, wandring about from house to house; and not only idle, but tatlers also, and busie-bodies, speaking things which they ought not. If that one rule of Christ, Matth. 18. 15, 16. were conscientiously and strictly at­tended to, to tell a trespassing Brother his sault privately, then with one or two more, if obstinacy make it necessary, and not to expose him to the whole Church, and much less to the whole World, with­out a plain necessity, How many thou­sand Ruptures would be prevented in Christian Societies? But instead of re­gularly admonishing and reproving those [Page 442] irregular and idle Tatlers (as the Apo­stle calls them) who make it their busi­ness to sow jealousies, to make and widen breaches amongst brethren.

Direction III.

Let all Christians govern their tongues and keep them under the command of the law of kindness in their mutual con­verses with one another. A soft answer (saith Solomon) Prov. 15. 1. turneth away wrath; but grievous words stir up an­ger: Hard to hard will never do well: How easily did Abigail disarm angry Da­vid by a gentle Apology? What more boisterous than the wind? Yet a gentle Rain will allay it. It may be strongly presumed that a meek and gentle answer will more easily allay the Passions of a godly man than of one that is both un­godly and full of Enmity towards us; and yet sometimes it hath done the latter. A company of vain wicked men having inflamed their Blood in a Tavern at Boston in New-England, and seeing that Reverend, Meek, and Holy Minister of Christ, Mr. Cotton coming along the street, one of them tells his companions, I'le go (saith he) and put a trick upon the old Cotton; down he goes, and crossing [Page 443] his way, whispers these words into his ear, Cotton (said he) thou art an old fool: Mr. Cotton replied, I confess I am so; the Lord make both me and thee wiser than we are, even wise to salvation: He re­lates this passage to his wicked compani­ons, which cast a great damp upon their spirits in the midst of a frolick: What peaceful Societies should we have, if our lips transgressed not the laws of love and kindness?

Direction IV.

Respectful Deportments to those that are beneath us in Gifts or Estates, is an ex­cellent conservative of Church-Peace. Lofty and Contemptuous carriages to­wards those that are beneath us in either respect, is a frequent occasion of bitter Jars and Animosities. The Apostle chargeth it upon the Corinthians, That no one be puffed up for one against another; for who maketh thee to differ from another? 1 Cor. 4. 6, 7. What respectful language did Holy Mr. Brewen give to his own godly servants? Remember, Christians, that there is neither rich nor poor, bond nor free, but all are one in Christ Jesus. This indeed destroys not the civil differen­ces God hath made between one and ano­ther. [Page 444] Grace will teach the godly ser­vant to give double honour to a Religi­ous Master or Mistress, the private Christian to a godly Magistrate or Mi­nister. It will teach the People to know them which labour among them, and are over them in the Lord, and admonish them, and to esteem them very highly in love for their works sake, and to be at peace among themselves, 1 Thes. 5. 12, 13. and it will also teach Superiors to condescend to men of low degree, and not to think of themselves above what they ought, but with all lowliness, meek­ness and long suffering to forbear one another in love, keeping (this way) the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace, Eph. 4. 2, 3.

Direction. V.

This gentle language and respectful deportment, would naturally and con­stantly flow from the Uniting Grace of Wisdom, Humility and Love, were they more exalted in the hearts of Christians.

Wisdom would allay those unchristian heats, Prov. 17. 27. a man of under­standing is of an excellent Spirit, so we render it, but the Hebrew signifies a cool Spirit; the wisdom that is from a­bove is gentle and easie to be intreated, Iames 3. 17.

[Page 445] Humility takes away the fewel from the fire of Contention; only from Pride cometh Contention, Prov. 13. 10. How dearly hath Pride, especially Spiritual Pride cost the Churches of Christ?

Love is the very Cement of Societies, the fountain of Peace and Unity; it think­eth no evil, 1 Cor. 13. puts the fairest sence upon doubtful words and actions, it beareth all things. Love me (saith Anstin) and reprove me as thou pleasest: 'Tis a radical grace, bearing the fruits of Peace and Unity upon it.

Direction VI.

Be of a Christ-like, forgiving Spirit one towards another, Eph. 4. 31, 32. Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking be put away from you, with all malice, and be ye kind one to another, tender-hearted, forgiving one another, as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you. Hath thy Brother offended thee? how apt art thou also to offend thy Brother? and which is infinitely more, how often dost thou every day grieve and offend Jesus Christ, who yet freely forgives all thy offences? Remember Friend, that an unforgiving is a sad sign of an unforgiven person. They that have found mercy, [Page 446] pity and forgiveness should of all men in the World be most ready to shew it.

Direction VII.

Be deeply affected with the mischie­vous effects and consequents of Schisms and Divisions in the Societies of the Saints, and let nothing beneath a plain necessity divide you from Communion one with another; hold it fast till you can hold it no longer without Sin. At the fire of your contentions your enemies warm their hands, and say, aha, so would we have it: Your Prayers are ob­structed, Mat. 5. 24. First be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift. Edification is hindred: Feaverish bodies thrive not, Eph. 4. 15. God is pro­voked to remove his Gracious presence from among you. Be of one mind (saith the Apostle) live in peace, and the God of peace shall be with you, 1 Cor. 13. 11. im­plying that their contentions would de­prive them of his blessed company with them. The glory of your society is clouded; if ye have bitter envyings and strife in you hearts, glory not, Iames 3. 14. Glory not in your Church Privile­ges, personal gifts and attainments; whatever you think of your selves you [Page 447] are not such Christians as you vogue your selves for, living in a Sin so directly con­trary to Christianity. The name of Christ is dishonoured. You are taken out of the world, to be a people for his name, that is, for his honour; but there's little credit to the name of Christ from a divi­ding, wrangling people. The alluring beauty of Christianity, by which the Church gains upon the world, Acts 2. 46, 47. is sullied and defaced, and there­by (as I noted before) conversion hin­dred, and a new stone, as it were, rolled over the graves of poor sinners, to keep them down in their impenitency: Trem­ble therefore at the thoughts of Divisions and Separations. St. Augustine notes three sins severely punished in Scripture. The Golden, Calf with the Sword; Iehoja­kims cutting the Sacred Roll, with a dreadful Captivity; but the Schism of Korah and his Accomplices, with the Earth's opening her mouth and swallow­ing them up quick.

Direction VIII.

Let all Church-Members see that they have Union with Christ, evidencing it self in daily sweet Communion with him. Lines drawn from a Circumference come [Page 448] nearest to one another in the Centre. When God intends to make the hearts of men one, he first makes them new, Ezek. 11. 19. I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you. And the more any renewed heart tasts the sweet­ness of Communion with God, by so much it is disposed for Unity and Peace with his People. Our frowardness and peevishness plainly discovers all is not well betwixt God and us. Nothing so opposite to, or abhorred by a soul that enjoys sweet Peace and Communion with Christ, than to live in sinful jars and contentions with his people. Return there­fore to the Primitive Spirit of Love and U­nity; forbear one another; forgive one another; mortifie your dividing Lusts; che­rish your Uniting Graces; mark them which cause divisions and offences, contrary to the doctrine ye have learned, and avoid them, Rom. 16. 17. In a Word, and that the Word of the Apostle in the Text, I be­seech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind, and in the same judgment.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.