P. 2. HE recites ſome words of G. Whitehead, as if they were Haeretical, which are not only Inoffenſive, but ſuch as import the Profeſſion of that Faith, without which no Man can be Sanctified. Again, in Anſwer to T. Smiths Queſtion, p. 23. Q. 43. When you tell us that ye have Faith in Chriſt, do you mean Chriſt, whoſe Perſon is now Aſcended into Heaven above the Clouds? Or do you mean only a Chriſt within you? G. W. replyeth. Anſw. Here thou wouldſt make two Chriſts, a Chriſt, whoſe Perſon is above the Clouds, and a Chriſt within. But how proveſt thou two ſuch Chriſts? We have Faith in that Chriſt that Deſcended from The Father, who is The SAME that Aſcended far Above all Heavens, that He might Fill All things, and this CHRIST We Witneſs IN US, who is not divided.

P. 6. On theſe words, 'His HUMANE PERSON (Agreeable to the Haereſie of NESTORIUS) us'd by John Faldo, G. Keith hath this Note: He means His Nature of Manhood, Perſonally United to his Godhead. Why Nature of Manhood, and not the uſual words His Humane Nature? If G. K. would put ſo favourable a conſtruction on the Words of the Quakers, as he does upon thoſe Haeretical words of John Faldo, the Bulk of his Narrative would ſhrivel into a very Narrow Compaſs.

P. 10. He recites theſe words of William Penn: The Seed of the Promiſe is an Holy and Spiritual Principle of Light, Life, and Power, that being received into the Heart, bruiſeth the Serpents Head. And becauſe the Seed which cannot be that Body, is Chriſt, as teſtifie the Scriptures, the Seed is one, and that Seed Chriſt, and Chriſt GOD over all, Bleſſed for ever; we do conclude, and that moſt truly, that Chriſt was, and is the Divine Word of Light and Life, that was in the Beginning with GOD, and was, and is GOD over all Bleſſed for ever. 'Tis Evident that when W. P. ſays, the Seed cannot be that Body, he means the Body of Chriſt conſidered Abſtractly from His Perſon or Eſſence which is Eternal. The SEED in the Language of the Apoſtle, ſignifies The SON OF GOD, conſidered with reference to that Body which he Aſſum'd in the Womb of the Bleſſed VIRGIN. The reſt of William Penn's words in this Place, contain a plain, and evident Confeſſion of Faith in the SON of God.

P. 17. G. K. hath theſe words: Nor will G. Whitehead, nor yet his Moderate, and Learned Church-man, their Evaſion Excuſe G. Whitehead his Groſs Error, in thus Oppoſing by Socinian Arguments the God-head of Chriſt, &c. And his Moderate Church-man is Idle, and Weak in granting the word Co-creating, and not Co-creator. Anſw. Co-CREATING ſignifies there are More Creating, or who do Create, than One: Co-CREATOR ſignifies there are More CREATORS, than One: The firſt Saying I Approve, the latter I Abhor. The Father, Son and Holy Ghoſt are Co-creating, but ONE CREATOR. Whether I Deſerve the Epithets of Idle and Weak; or G. Keith of Proud and Inſolent, the Learned and Pious Reader may Determine.

In his Letter to G. W. He ſays that I take part with G. W. in his Vile Errors. I CHALLENGE GEORGE KEITH to Prove that I have Aſſerted any one Error, in any one of the ſeveral Papers that have been Publiſh'd for Me by the People called Quakers. He would have the World to Believe that I am one of thoſe who call themſelves DEISTS, viz. who Deny that Jeſus Chriſt is the True and Eternal GOD. E. El. ſays he, by name, and ſome other Deiſts. Here he's Guilty of a moſt Notorious LYE: For he knows that I do moſt Earneſtly Profeſs the Belief of the God-head of JESUS CHRIST.

That this Malitious Aſperſion may not in any meaſure ſtick on Me, I ſhall entreat the Learned Reader to Peruſe my Treatiſe entituled, DEI INCARNATI VINDICIAE, and my Paper againſt CRELLIƲS. I would have G. Keith to Know, that the Moderate Church-man moſt earneſtly Deſires, that both Himſelf and G. Keith may be ever Mindful of thoſe words of the Bleſſed Apoſtle: Let your MODERATION be known unto all Men. The LORD is at hand.