MANY Reasons lead me to oppose a Comprehension, and the first of them is the very reason I pereive which others have given for it, That it fortifies the Church of England against Dissenters; for since our Fear was of Pope­ry, to translate it so early against Protestants of other Communions, is to tell them, that having rid our selves of Papists, we are making New Le­vies against them, and that we only halt a while to recruit our Numbers, and when in a posture to attack them, they shall not fail to feel the weight of our Power and Comprehension. By this means, of very good Friends against Popery, we shall grow Parties and Enemies; and if this be not to be most carefully avoided in our present Condition, I am mistaken both in my Religion and Politicks.

II. But Secondly, What need is there of a Comprehension, which carries in it a Variation of the Old and Settled Methods of the Church, only to let in so many Men to Church Bene­fices; for when all is done, that must be the Mark they aim at, that press it on the side of the Presbiterian, since an Act of Indulgence would else answer that Gentleman as well: And if it were a Consciencious Desire on the other side to enlarge the Church, it would become a Duty with her to fling off all the rest that others scruple, upon as good grounds, and which cannot be said to be Essential to Faith or Worship, and so make but one Work of it for this Age. Since Conscience therefore does not seem to be the Ground of this Comprehension on either side, it must needs have but an ill bottom to stand upon.

III. We are not, nor cannot be assured, That the alteration this brings to the Church of England will stop here; for more Knowledge or Delusion prevailing among themselves or o­thers, will call for the use of the same Prudence; and so she can never be certain and stable, but subject to change with the Postures and Motions of Opinion or State.

IV. It has something in it of Irreverence and Levity. Two Churches to bargain about Faith and Worship, to take or leave, add or diminish, and both Parties to shew themselves stiff or careless for the same things, as Humor or Interest govern them, which in Men pretend­ing to Religion, cannot fail to scandalize those that are not so Believing or Zealous as they ought to be.

V. I consider the very differing Temper of the Two Parties, whether it flow from Succes­sion of Education given by the Authors or Founders of them, or the Influence of their Prin­ciples, or that one has been used to Ease and Dominion, and the other to want the first and feel the last, or from all of them; but 'tis certain, there is a Latitude and an Hospitality, a Passion and Reverence to Majesty, almost to an Implicite Obedience, in the Church of England, and in the Presbiterian Communion, a Stiffness, a Meddling, a Censoriousness, not sparing their Superiours; naturally indeed inclined to Kings, but loving them as Boys do their Tops, to whip them. And it is this Disposition that has ever made that Society troublesome both to Church and State. Now as Men that are not of a Temper live best with one another at some Distance, so the Church of England will be less perplexed, and the Presbiterian less con­trouled in an Act of Indulgence than in one of Comprehension.

VI. If the Comprehension be not stated upon an Ʋnity of Practice, it can never endure. For look how many different Practices there are, so many Parties in a short time there will be; and such a Comprehension can only serve to break and dissolve, instead of strengthening, the present Church. Common Sense teaches us, That one Enemy within doors is stronger than Ten without doors; and such every person comprehended must render himself after a while, upon a differing Practice from the Old Standers of the Communion. If I saw more Piety and Charity in both Parties than formerly, I would forbid my self this liberty; but when I find Passions as strong, and Interest as prevalent on each side as ever, I must beg their pardon, if I sav I cannot think their Notion of a Comprehension reasonable.

Lastly, No body has ever yet succeeded upon this Design. It has been endeavor'd by great Men of several Perswasions at several times, as Cassander, Cajetan, Erasmus, Melancthon, Phlugius, Grotius, Salmasius, Dury, and others, as well between Papists and Protestants, as Lutherans and Calvinists, but ever to no purpose: and tho the Ministers should come in, their People would, in all probability, fall to their share that are left out by this Act of Com­prehension. Wherefore I conclude, It is an Attempt that shews, in some men, more of Fancy than Judgement, and Interest than Religion; and that Iron and Clay will as soon cement, as our Episcopacy and Presbitery, will or can joyn to constitute one National Church in England.