The Case of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the consideration of both Houses of Parliament.

The Case of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the consideration of both Houses of Parliament.

Table of contents

The CASE of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the Consideration of both Houses of Parliament.

[Page]

The CASE of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the Consideration of both Houses of Parliament.

WHereas Richard Stafford hath been, and stands yet indicted at Common Law, and hath suffered a Weeks Imprisonment in Newgate for certain Papers, entituled, A Supplemental Tract of Government, &c. which he delivered in to the late Parliament on January 4. 1689. to which he made an Appearance at the last Sessions at the Old-Bayley, and had Oyer of his Indictment, which did run in these words, viz. That the said Richard Stafford did intend to raise difference and discord between the King and Queen, and their Peers and Great Men, and the Commons of this Kingdom of England in Parliament lately assembled, &c. He the said Richard Stafford did offer to this by way of Answer and Plea, That what he did was in full Parliament, and that he was introduced according to Form and Order into the House of Lords, the House then sitting; and the Substance and Matter of the said Paper, was referred to the Consideration of the Lords and Commons; And if it did tend to breed difference and discord between the King and Queen and Them, Themselves were the more proper Judges of what lay in their own breast, and whereof a Jury of 12 inferiour Men were not so fit to judge and determine. And further it was alledged, That this Case did come within the reason of Stat. 1o. Gulielmi & Marie, for declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject, and setling the Succession of the Crown; wherein amongst the several instances of mal-administration of the late Reign there recited, one was, By Prosecutions in the Court of the Kings-Bench for Matters and Causes cognizable only in Parliament: And it was a like Error there to proceed in a more inferiour Court for what belongs to their Conusance. Though this Clause was inserted in as to the Case of Mr. Williams, who was illegally proceeded against in the Kings-Bench, for what he did as Speaker in the House of Commons; yet no publick Statute expressed in general words, is made to reach only one single and particular Case, but it takes in all others of the like Nature and Reason. It is agreeable both to the Statute and Common Laws of this Kingdom, and to right Practice and Usage, That things should be heard where they are done: And that great and weighty matters (whereof the present, according to the Indictment, is the greatest that can be, and may be stiled a Case of many Generations) should be determined in the highest Courts of Judicatory. The reason why some things of this nature have been tryed at Common Law, is because sometimes of the long interval and space of time between Parliaments, (and with this, if I mistake not, they did palliate the proceedings against Mr. Williams) and so the Offender might escape Justice in the mean while, which would be a great inconvenience: Or if he lie only under suspicion and doubt, his Tryal would be deferred; or if he be falsly accused and charged, he is delayed from clearing and vindicating his own innocence in the mean while, which is a very great prejudice & trouble to himself.

But here by a strange Art and most wicked Corruption, of calling evil good, and good evil; of justifying the wicked for reward, and taking away the righteousness of the righteous from him, Isa. 5.20.23. by turning of things upside down, Isa. 29.16. the aforesaid Richard Stafford is charged to do a thing unlawfully, unjustly, and wickedly, when he doth only lay the Laws of God before Men; He doth endeavour (according to his Duty and the Grace committed unto him) to turn them from Iniquity unto Righteousness. He doth say and affirm, That all the Words mentioned in the aforesaid Papers are True, Significative, and will be certainly fulfilled. He doth come in the Name of Almighty God, and will make evident his Commission, that he is really sent, and hath more words to speak out in Person viva voce, unto the Honourable Houses of Parliament; Hoping that they will not be like their Forefathers, a Rebellious and Stubborn Generation, which refuse to hear the Law of their God. It is Gods constant Method to speak unto the World by those of the same likeness with our selves; and he doth, commonly raise up mean Persons to convey forth his Truth unto Men, That the excellency should be of God, and not of us. I dare not abuse nor trifle with his Name, but am ready to explain the nature and meaning thereof, if I may be heard out throughly without any interruption. And so likewise, ye ought to take heed how ye reject it, for you will admit of things of lesser moment. If another should come from an Earthly Prince, or discover some new thing, or in a matter of Peace and War, of Rights or Priviledges, him will ye hear: But ye are apt to refuse or disregard, what hath relation to the immediate Government of him who is the Great King over all the Earth, and in subordination to that, is not only for the real Peace and Security of this whole Nation, but of the Kingdoms round about. If I speak falshood or folly, as I should then be liable unto the Wrath and Judgment of the great God for taking his Name in vain, and making vile his Majesty; so in the mean while, I contentedly submit to be made an Example of your utmost Severity and Punishment, for disturbing and interrupting your Counsels. But if I speak Wisdom and Truth, I ought to be hearkened unto.

Information about this book

Title statement

The Case of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the consideration of both Houses of Parliament.

Edition statement

1689

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2009-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A35636

ID [STC]

Wing C971

ID [STC]

ESTC R37532

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

16967407

ID [OCLC]

ocm 16967407

ID [VID]

105544

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A35636)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 105544)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1611:20)

Source

— The Case of Richard Stafford humbly offered to the consideration of both Houses of Parliament.,

Extent

1 broadside.

s.n.,. [S.l. :: 1690?]. (Date of publication from NUC pre-1956 imprints.) (The writer of this article was Supporting Staffords position in writing his A supplemental tract of government.) (Reproduction of original in the Bodleian Library.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.