AN EXPOSITION WITH Practical Observations CONTINUED Upon the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Chapters of the BOOK OF JOB: Being the substance of XXXV. Lectures, delivered at Magnus near the Bridge, London.

By JOSEPH CARYL, Preacher to the Honourable Society of Lincolnes Inne.

JAMES, Chap. 1. Ver. 2, 3, 4.

My brethren count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations. Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.

But let patience her perfect worke, that ye may be perfect and intire wanting nothing.

LONDON: Printed for L. Fawne, L. Lloyd, and M. Simmons. 1656.

To the Christian READER.
TO Those chiefly of this CITY, who have been the Moovers, and are the Pro­moters of this Worke.

Sirs,

YOur continued care and labor of love, enga­ges a like degree of both, for the growth of this Infant worke. And therefore (though in the midst of manifold diversi­ons) these peeces are ventur'd out. We live in an Age (O that we could live it) where­in the hand of Providence works gloriously, yea ter­ribly: Having then, got three or foure steps further into this Book of Providence, it will not be unseasonable, to shew you the Prints of them. Especially seeing this History of Jobs affliction, looks so like a prophecy of ours; and (almost in every line) gives us some lineament of our present trou­bles and distempers, of our hopes and feares.

In the three former Chapters we had a Narrative of the case, and of those occurrences out of which the Question here debated receives it's state. As also the bringing together of the Interlocutors, or persons maintaining this Discourse: As we may alwayes observe in the writings of the Ancients, [Page] whether Naturall, Morall or Divine, which are composed into Dialogues or Disputes.

This great Divinity act (one of the greatest surely and most solemn, I thinke the first that ever was held out, in such a formality, in the world) is principally spent, upon that no­ble probleme, How the justice and goodnesse of God can be salved, while his providence distributes good to the evill, and evill to the good. A Question started and toucht in many books of the holy Scriptures; but is here (ex professo) purposely handled: First, in a very long Disputa­tion, between Job the Respondent, and his three Friends Opponents; Then in a full determination, first, by Elihu an acute and wise, then by God himselfe, the most wise and infallible Moderator.

The Method here observed is after the manner of the Schooles (pro and contra) every one of the foure disputants, having his severall opinion; and each one his arguments in favour of his own. Which, yet, are not presented in that affe­cted plainness of the Schoolmen, with their down-right (vi­detur quod sic, probatur quodnon) This I affirm, this I prove, this I deny, this disprove. The pen-men of the holy Ghost never discuss Questions so, no, nor any of the old Philosophers. This Covert carriage of their opinions, and close contexture of their arguments, Answers, and Re­plies about them, render the Booke somewhat dark and ob­scure to the Readers meditation. And therefore, it will be a designe not unprofitable (if that end offer'd at, may be attain­ed) briefly to draw them forth, and set them before you in a more open light. And doublesse, what they hold, and by what mediums they mannage their proofs, may (by the blessing of God upon serious thoughts and frequent reviews) be made out to a very great plainnesse.

Towards which, it is observable, that, there are many threeds of the same colour and substance, mixt and inter­woven by the Disputants throughout this whole Discourse. [Page] And, that, though the three Opponents with one consent, set up Job, as their common mark to shoot at; yet they take up very different standings, if not different levels, varying each from other in some things, as well as all (upon the main) from him.

The reason of the former is this, because there are some common principles, wherein they all agree: which, if we ab­stract, with what is spoken in the illustration of them, taking in also those conclusions, which springs from them as their first borne: Then the remainder will shew us that proper & distinctive opinion, which each of them holds about this grand Question of providence; the events & distributi­ons wherof, seeme so cross-handed in giving trouble and sor­row to godly men, joy and prosperity to the wicked.

There are three principles, wherein Job concurs with his three friends; and a fourth, wherin they three concur a­gainst him. The three, wherein all foure agree, are these:

First, That, all the afflictions and calamities, which befall man, fall within the eye and certain knowledge of God.

Secondly, That, God is the Author and efficient cause, the orderer and disposer of all those afflictions and calamities.

Thirdly, That, in regard of his most holy Majesty, and unquestionable Soveraignty, he neither doth, nor can doe any wrong or injury to any of his creatures, whatsoever affliction he laies, or, how long soever he is pleased to continue it upon them.

These three principles and such conclusions, as are im­mediately deducible from them are copiously handled and in­sisted upon by them all. In persuance wherof, they all speak ve­ry glorious things of the Power, Wisdom, Justice, Holi­nes & Soveraignty of the Lord. In proclaiming every of which Attributes, the tongue of Job like a silver Trumpet, lifts up the name of God so high, that he seems to drown the [Page] sound of the other three, & makes their praise, almost, silent.

But Jobs three friends proceed to a fourth principle; which, He utterly denies, about which, so much of his answer, as is contradictory to their objections & rejoynders, wholly consists. That, their fourth principle seems to be bottom'd upon two grounds.

First, That whosoever is good, and doth good, shall receive a present good reward, according to the mea­sure of the good he hath done; and, That whosoever is wicked, and doth wickedly, shall be paid with pre­sent punishment, according to the measure of his demerits.

Seondly, That if (at any time) a wicked man flourish in outward prosperity yet, his flourishing is very mo­mentany, and suddenly (in this life) turnes to, or ends in visible judgements. And, That, if (at any time) a godly man be wither'd with adversity yet, his withe­ring is very short, and suddenly (in this life) turnes to, or ends in visible blessings.

Ʋpon these two grounds or suppositions, They raise and build their fourth principle, from which, They three make continuall batteries upon the innocency of Job. We may conceive the position in this frame.

That, whosoever is greatly afflicted, and is held long under the pressure of his affliction, that man is to be numbred with the wicked, though; no other evi­dence or witnesse appeare or speak a word against him. Hence

The peculiar opinion of Eliphaz rises thus; That, all the outward evils, which over-take man in the course of this life, are the proseeds of his own sin, and so from the processe of Gods justice. He gives us this sence, for his, in expresse termes, Chap. 4. 8. They that plow iniqui­ty and sow wickednesse reape the same; which he ap­plies parsonally to Job (Chap. 22. v. 5, 6.) Is not thy wick­ednesse [Page] great, and thine iniquities infinite, Thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought, and and stripped the naked of their cloathing, &c. The whole scope of his speech bends the same way; and is, as if he had said, to Job; Though thy carriage hath been so plausible among us, that we are not able to accuse thee of sin, yet these judgements accuse thee, and are sufficient witnesses against thee; These cry out with a loud voyce, that thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought, &c. Though we have not seen thee act these sins, yet, in these effects we see thou hast acted them; The snares which are round about thee tell us, thou hast laid snares for others, & he that runs may read how terrible, how troublesome thou hast been to the poore, in the terrours which have seaz'd thy spirit, and in the troubles which have spoyl'd thee of thy riches.

Bildad the Shuite speaks second; His opinion is not so ri­gid, as that of Eliphaz. He grants, that afflictions may fall upon a righteous person, yet so, that if God send not deliver­ance speedily, if he restore him not quickly to his former e­state and honour, then (upon the second ground of the fourth princple) such a man may be censured, cast and condemned as unrighteous. That such was Bildads judgement, in this case, is cleare Chap. 8. 5, 6. If thou wert pure and upright, surely now he would awake for thee, and make the habitation of thy righteousnesse prospe­rous, Though thy beginning was small, yet thy latter end shall greatly increase; And vers. 20, 21. Behold God will not cast away a perfect man, &c. till he fill thy mouth with laughing, and thy lips with rejoycing. As if he had said, I connot assent to my brother Eliphaz, affirming, That every man afflicted, is afflicted, for his wickednesse, I (for my part) believe and am perswa­ded, that a godly man may be afflicted for the tryall & exercise of his graces, &c. but, then I am assured, that [Page] God never lets him lie in his afflictions, for, as soon as he cries and cals, the Lord awakes presently, makes his habitation prosperous again, and increases him more then ever. I grant the Lord may cast down a perfect man, but, he will not (in this life) cast him away; no he will speedily fill his mouth with laughing, and his lips with rejoycing.

Zophar, the third Opponent differs from the two for­mer in this great controversie, affirming, That, the reason of all those afflictions, which presse the children of men, is to be resolved into the absolute will and plea­sure of God; that, we are not further to enquire about his wisdome, justice or mercy in dispencing them, his counsels being unsearchable, and his wayes past find­ing out. Thus he delivers his mind (Ch. 11. 7, 8.) Canst thou by searching find out God? Canst thou by sear­ching find him out to perfection? It is as high as hea­ven, what canst thou do? Deeper then hell, what canst thou know? vers. 12. Vaine man would be wise, though man be borne like a wild Asses colt. In the rest of his speech, he comes nearest the opinion of Bildad, vers. 14, 15, 16. and gives out [...]s hard thoughts of Job, as either of his bre­thren, numbring him among the wicked, & assigning him the reward of an hypocrite (Chap. 10. 29.) This is the por­tion of a wicked man from God, and the heritage ap­pointed unto him by God.

These (I conceive) are the Characteristicall opinions of Jobs three friends, about his case. All consistent with those four principles, which they hold in common, all equally clo­sing in the censure and condemnation of Job, though in some things dissenting and falling off from one another.

But what thinks Job? or how doth he acquit or extricate himself from these difficulties? very well, His sentence is plainly this.

That, The providence of God, dispences outward [Page] prosperity and affliction so indifferently to good and bad, to the righteous & the wicked, that no unerring judgement can possibly be made up, of any mans spi­rituall estate, by the face, & upon the view of his tem­porall. He declares this, as his opinion, in cleare, resolute and Categoricall termes, (Ch. 9. v. 22, 23.) This is one thing, therefore I said it, He destroyeth the perfect and the wicked, if the scourge slay suddenly, he will laugh at the triall of the innocent. Which opinion hath no quar­rell at all with any of those three principles, held by Job joyntly, and in consort, with his three friends, but only with their fourth: which he throughout refutes as heterodox & unsound in it self, as uncomfortable to the Spirits, and in­consistent with experiences of the Saints. In the Strong hold and Fort-royal of this holy truth, Job secures him­self against all the assaults, and scatters all the Objections of his Opponents: resolving to maintain it to the very death; he will lay his bones by this position, say his unkind friends, what they can against him, & let the most wise God, doe what he pleases with him.

That, he was a sinner, he readily grants; that, he was an hypocrite, he flatly denies.

That, the Lord was righteous in all his dealings with him, he readily grants. That, himself was righteous, because the Lord had dealt so with him, he statly denies.

How perfect soever he was, he confesses, that, he needed the free-grace and mercies of the Lord to justifie him, but with­all, asserts, that he was perfect enough, to justifie himselfe against all the challenges of man.

In these acknowledgements of his sinfullnesse, and denials of insincerity. In these humblings of himself before God, and acquittings of himself before men: in these implorings of mer­cy from the Lord, and complainings of the unkindnesse of his brethren, the strength of Jobs answer consists, and the specialties of it may be summ'd up.

'Tis true that through the extremity of his pain, the an­guish of his spirit, and the provocation of his friends, some unwary speeches slipt from him. For which, Elihu reproved him gravely and sharply, of which, himselfe repented sorrowfully and heartily, all which, the most gracious God passed by and pardon'd freely, not imputing sin unto him.

Thus (Christian reader) I have endeavoured (as hereto­fore of the whole Book, so now) to give a brief account con­cerning the Argumentative part of it: And to represent how far in this great Controversie, the Answerer and his Ob­jectors agree in judgement, and where they part.

If this discovery administer any help, as a Threed to lead your meditations, through the many secret turnings, and in­tricacies of this dispute, the labor in drawing it out is abun­dantly satisfied. And if any further light, subservient to this end, shall be given in from the Father of lights, that also in it's season may be held forth and set upon a Candle-stick.

What, is now received, together with the textuall Exposi­tions upon this first Undertaking between Eliphaz and Job, I leave in your hands: praying for a blessing from on high, to convay truth home to every heart; desiring earnest prayers for the Spirit of grace and illumination to be powred out, according to the measure of the gift of Christ, upon

Your very affectionate Friend and Servant in this worke of the Lord Joseph Caryl.

AN EXPOSITION Upon the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Chapters of the Book of JOB.

JOB Chap. 4. Verse

1. Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said.

2. If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved? But who can withhold himselfe from speaking?

3. Behold, thou hast instructed many, & thou hast strength­ned the weak hands.

4. Thy words have upholden him that was falling, and thou hast strengthened the feeble knees.

5. But now it is come upon thee and thou faintest, it touch­eth thee and thou art troubled.

6. Is not this thy feare, thy confidence, the uprightnesse of thy wayes and thy hope.

IOBS complaint ended in the former Chapter: in this a hot dispute begins. Job having curs'd his day, is now chid himselfe. And he had such a chiding, as was indeed a wounding, such as almost at every word, drew blood; and was not onely a Red upon his back, but a Sword at his heart. Job was wounded first by Satan, he was wounded a second time by his [Page 2] Wife, a third time he was wounded (not as it is spoken in the Pro­phet, in the house of his friends, but) in his own house by his friends; Zach. 13. 6. these last wounds are judg'd (by good Physitians in soule-afflicti­ons) his deepest and soarest wounds.

Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said.

Eliphaz, being (as is supposed) the elder and chiefe of the three, first enters the list of this debate with Job: concerning whose name, person and pedigree, we have spoken before at the eleventh Verse of the second Chapter, and therefore referring the Reader thither, for those circumstantials of the speaker, I shall immediate­ly descend unto the matter here spoken.

If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved? &c.

The whole discourse of Eliphaz may be divided into three ge­nerall parts.

  • 1. The Preface
    • of his Speech.
  • 2. The Body
  • 3. The Conclusion

The Preface of his speech is contained in the second Verse, If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved? &c.

The Body of his speech is extended through this fourth and to the last Verse of the fifth Chapter: It consisteth especially of two members, or two sorts of matter, in which Eliphaz deals with Job.

The first is reprehensory, by way of conviction and reproof.

The second is exhortatory, by way of counsell and advice.

First Eliphaz reprehends Job. This work of reprehension be­gins at the third Verse of this Chapter, and is continued to the end of the fourth Verse of the fift Chapter. And to shew that he did not reprehend him upon passion, he grounds this reprehension upon reason, and strengthens his reproofe with Arguments. And there are four reasons or speciall Arguments, which Eliphaz takes up to make this reprehension convincing, the naming of them will give light to the whole, before we come to particulars.

The first Argument is contained in the words I have read to the end of the sixth Verse. And it is taken from the unsuitablenesse of his present practice, to his former precepts.

Or from the inequality of the course, he now took under afflic­tion, to the counsell he had given others under affliction.

His second Argument beginning at the seventh Verse and carried on to the twelfth, is grounded upon a supposed inequality of Gods present dealing with him, in reference to his former dealings with godly men.

Eliphaz thought thus, surely Job is an Hypocrite, otherwise God would have dealt with him, as with an innocent; Remember (saith he) I pray thee, who ever perished being innocent; I will con­vince thee by all examples, by whatsoever is upon Record, in the History of all Ages, that thou art an Hypocrite, a wicked person; for see, if thou canst finde an instance in any Story, of an innocent person perishing. That is his second Argument.

His third Argument is continued from the twelfth Verse to the end of this fourth Chapter; and that he might make the deeper impression upon Jobs spirit, he brings it in with a dreadfull Pream­ble: a Vision from God, at once terrifying and instructing him, thus to reason downe the pride of man. The Argument it selfe is coucht in the seventeenth verse. It is drawn from an evidence of presumption in all such, as shall dare to implead Gods justice or plead their own: as if Eliphaz had said, surely thou art a proud and a wicked person, for there was never any godly man upon the face of the Earth, no nor any Angel in Heaven that durst be so bold with God as thou hast been; Shall mortall man (saith he) be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker? Be­hold he put no trust in his servants, and his Angels he charged with folly.

His fourth Argument begins at the fifth Chapter and ends with the fourth Verse; and it is taken from the unlikenesse of Jobs carriage under his afflictions, to that which any of the Saints in any age of the World did ever shew forth under their afflictions. He that caries himselfe so, as none of the Saints ever caried themselves, gives an evidence against his Saintship, Call now to the Saints, ei­ther those now living upon the Earth, or search the Records con­cerning all the Saints that ever lived, consider, and see whether thou canst observe or reade any paralell of thy complaints, and un­reasonable expostulotions. So much for the summe of his con­victions.

Then Eliphaz turnes himselfe to admonition and exhortation in the following part of that fifth Chapter; and there are two Heads of his admonitory exhortation.

First, he admonishes him, to seek unto God and to call upon [Page 4] him, Vers. 8. I would seek unto God, and unto God, would I commit my cause. I give thee no other counsell then I would take my selfe. If I were in thy case, I would not stand thus complaining and cur­sing my day, but this I would doe, I would seek unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause. This admonition is enforced by di­vers Arguments to the seventeenth Verse.

The second head of his exhortation beginneth at the seventeenth Verse, and it is to prevaile with him, patiently to bear, and quietly to accept his affliction, or the punishment of his iniquity: in pur­suance of this he shews him many benefits and blessings, attending those who graciously comply with the correcting hand of God up­on them. Behold (saith he Verse 17.) happie is the man whom God correcteth, therefore despise not thou the chastning of the Almighty; he concludeth all from his certain knowledge and infallible experi­ence of what he had said (Verse 27.) Loe, this we have searched it, so it is; Back'd with a warranty, that if he obey, his own ex­perience shall quickly teach him this truth; Heare it, and know thou it for thy good.

So much concerning the Division or Parts of this first Speech or dispute made by Eliphaz in answer to the former complaint, pow­red out by Job against the day of his birth, and the night of his con­ception, in the third Chapter.

The six Verses (lately read) containe (as I said before) the first Argument; we have the Preface in the second Verse, and the Ar­gument it selfe in the four following. The point which Eliphaz desires to prove and clear is this; that Job was guiltie of hypocrisie, of close hypocrisie at the least, if not of grosse hypocrisie. The Me­dium or reason by which he would prove it, is the unsuitablenesse of his present practise to his former Doctrine. His actions under sufferings contradict what himselfe had taught other sufferers. And this speaks him guilty, The Argument may be thus formed.

That mans religion is but vaine and his profession hypocriticall, who having comforted others in, and taught them patience under affliction, is himselfe (being afflicted) comfortlesse and impatient.

But Job, thus it is with thee, thou hast been a man very forward to comfort others and teach them patience, yet now thou art comfortlesse and impatient.

Therefore thy religion is vaine, and thy profession is hypocri­ticall.

Is not this thy feare? Here is a goodly religion indeed, a proper peece of profession: and such is thine, this is all thou art able to make out. Thus you have the Logicall strength or the Argument contained in the words. We shall now examine them in the Gram­maticall sense of every part, as they lye here in order. And first for the Preface.

If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved? but who can withhold himselfe from speaking?

The words import, as if Eliphaz had said thus unto Job; we thy friends have all this while stood silent, we have given thee full li­berty and scope to speak out all that was in thine heart, let it not grieve thee, if we now take liberty to speak our selves: and indeed a necessity lies upon us to speak. Two things Eliphaz puts into this Preface, whereby he labours to prepare the minde of Job, readily to hear and receive what he had to say unto him.

First, he tels him that he speaks out of good will and as a friend to him. If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved? Pray doe not take it ill, we meane you no harme, we would but give you faithfull counsell, we speak from our hearts, not from our spleen, we speak from love to thee, let it not be thy griefe.

Secondly, he shewes that he was necessitated to speak, as love provokes, so necessity constrains, who can withhold himselfe from speaking? either of these considerations is enough to unlock both eare and heart to take in wholesome counsell. What eare, what heart will not the golden key of love, or the iron key of necessity open to instruction? when a friend speaks, and he speaks as bound, when kindnesse and dutie mix in conference, how powerfull!

If we assay, or try. The word signifies properly to tempt, either [...] Tentav [...]t in bo­num vel in ma­lum, periculum fecit, expertus est. [...] A ly [...]um quasi Graculum vel loquuto [...]ium dictum, quod Deus inde re­sponsa daret. for good or evill; and because in temptation, an assay or experi­ment is made of a man, how bad or how good he is; Therefore the word is applyed to any assaying or experimenting of things or per­sons. This very word is winning and gaining upon Job. We will but try a little if we can doe thee any good, or bring lenitives to thy sorrowes, we will not be burthensome or tedious; we will but assay to commune with thee. The word notes serious speaking. The place where God communed with his people, in giving an­swers from Heaven, is express'd by this word, 1 Kings 6. 19. The Oracle he prepared in the house within, &c. or the communing-place where God spake.

Wilt thou be grieved?] The word signifies to be extreamly [...] Fessus corpore vel animo, in­sanivit, furiit. wearled even unto rage or fainting. Here Elipphaz seemes to hint at Jobs former distemper'd speeches. If we speak, wilt thou promise us not to fall into such a fit of passion, as even now thou wast in. And yet whatsoever comes of it, or howsoever thou takest it, I must discharge my duty and my conscience; therefore he addes, who can withhold himselfe from speaking? That is, no man can withhold himselfe from speaking in such a case as this: to heare thee speak thus would even make a dumb man speak; Christ saith in the Gospel, If these should hold their peace the stones would cry; there is such a sense in these words: if we thy friends should hold our peace, when thou speakest thus, the very stones would cry out a­gainst thee for speaking, and against us for holding our peace. The Hebrew word translated withhold, signifies to shut up a thing so as [...] Clausit co [...]cuit 1 Kings 8 35. that it cannot come out: It is applyed to the locking up of the Clouds that they raine not; to the holding in of fire that it cannot break forth; Jer: 20. 9. where the Prophet very elegantly fits it to the restraining of speech, which is the very point in hand. His word was in mine heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones, I was weary with forbearing. So it implyes that the friends of Job had as it were a fire in their bosomes, which they could no longer restraine, they were as Clouds full of water, full of deaw and raine, they were not able to suspend themselves from dissolving and showring upon Job, both reproofe and counsell, advises and exhortations.

We may observe from this Preamble, That it is wisdome to sweeten reproofe with friendly insinuations. Reproofe is a bitter Pill; it is a wholesome yet a bitter Pill, and there is need to wrap it up in Gold and Sugar, that pleasing both eye and palat it may be taken downe the better. It is the Apostles counsell to his Galatians, Gal. 6. 1. Brethren, if a man be overtaken with a fault, yee that are spiri­tuall restore such an one in the spirit of meeknesse. The word re­store, is an allusion to the Art of Chirurgerie, in setting a bone out of joynt; soft words and a soft hand fit the Patients minde to en­dure that painfull operation. By fals into sinne, the soule breaks or disjoynts a bone, he that will set such a minde▪ must handle it gent­ly. We may observe the holy skill of some of the Saints in prayer, preparing God for receiving of Petitions, by prefaces and hum­ble insinuations (as it were) getting within him. Thus did Abra­ham, Gen. 18. when he prayed for Sodome, Let not my Lord be angry if I who am but dust and ashes speake unto thee. There is [Page 7] such a spirituall art in winding a reproofe into the bosome and spi­rit of a man, Let it not trouble thee that I thus speak, take my words in good part, If we assay to commune with thee wilt thou be grieved?

Secondly, observe, That it is no easie thing to beare reproofe. To take a reproofe well is as high a point of spirituall wisdome, as to give it well. When we reprove the sinne, we should love the man; but there are few men who can love their reprovers. You know what is said in the Prophet, They hate him that reproveth in the gate. Reproofs are usually entertained with hatred, and ill taken by evill persons; reproofe is not alwayes taken in good part, by those who are good. It is but need to have some way made for its due entertainment, by the best temper'd spirits. Wilt thou be grieved? it may be wearisome and troublesome unto thee, but I pray let it not.

Thirdly, observe from the Preface, That in some cases it is our duty to speak and reprove whether men are troubled or no. How should I be pleased if thou wouldest receive my speech in good part? but I cannot withhold my selfe from speaking, though thou art displeased; take it how you will, I must speak, these reproofs must out. When we see plainly that God is dishonoured, and that the soule of our brother is greatly endangered, we must then speak (as God chargeth the Prophet) whether they will heare or whether they will forbeare. In such cases we must adventure to save men by Ep. Jude v. 23 feare, plucking them out of the fire.

Lastly, observe, That when the heart is full it is a very hard thing, not to give it vent at the lips by speaking. When the heart is full of matter, the tongue will be full of words; the tongue must bring forth the treasures that are laid up in the heart: Who (saith Eliphaz) can withhold himselfe from speaking? The Prophet Je­remiah, Chap. 20. 9. thought to stifle the message of God in his heart, I said I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name, he began to take up a resolution to withhold himselfe from speaking, but (saith he) his word was in mine heart as a burn­ing fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay, I could not hold it any longer. So the Apostles, Acts 4. 19. We cannot but speak that which we have heard and seen, it is impossible for us, the Lord hath spoken who can but prophesie? Amos 3. 8. that is, who can withhold himselfe from prophesying when once the Lord bids him speak. Words are the conceptions of our [Page 8] mindes, and when our thoughts are form'd and organized as it were, and grown to perfection, when those children come to the birth a little strength will bring them forth. Or rather, great strength cannot keepe them, from being brought forth. It is as pos­sible for her that is with childe to withhold the birth, as it is for those that have pregnant conceptions or an errand from God, to withhold themselves from speaking. When David kept silence (it is a strange connexion) he roared, Psal. 32. 3. When he held his peace from good, his sorrow was stirred, Psal. 39. 2. Pangs took hold on him as upon a woman in travell, which made him roare. His heart waxt hot & the fire burned, till he spake with his tongue. He was then delivered. Our English phrase of Delivering a mans minde, may hit this sense well. Their hearts are barren, whose mouths are alwayes shut. Who can withhold himselfe from speak­ing?

But what is it that he could not forbeare? He could not forbear to tell him, that (as he supposed) he acted against his own princi­ples. Behold thou hast instructed many, and thou hast strengthened the weak hands, &c.

Behold.] This word is sometime used in a way of derision, as Ecce doctorem egregium! Ecce medicum aliorum qui se­ipsum curare nesciat. Gen. 3. 22. where God saith concerning Adam, Behold the man is become as one of us, doe you not see what a God he is? how like a God he lookes? so, Behold thou hast instructed many, (some make that the sense) see now your great Teacher, your learned Do­ctor; he that hath been so forward and busie in teaching others, see in what disorder, how uncomposed he is himselfe: he would needs physick his Neighbours, but knows not how to cure his own distempers.

But rather take it by way of ásseveration. Behold, as if he should say, this is a thing clear and certaine, all that are about thee, can witnesse it, that thou hast instructed many, and that thou hast strengthened the weak hands. But how art thou changed? thou art not like the man thou wast.

Here are foure speciall acts of spirituall charity, so we may call and distinguish them. First, instructing of the ignorant; secondly, encouraging of the weak and sloathfull; thirdly, supporting of those that are ready to fall; and fourthly, comforting those that are rea­dy to faint. In these foure duties Job had been very conversant. Indoctos do­cere.. Instruction of the ignorant, Behold thou hast instructed many. Torpentes ex­citare.. Encouragement of the weak and sloathfull, Thou hast strength­ned [Page 9] the weake hands. Labentes eri­gere.. Supportation of the weake, Thy words have upholden him that was falling. Maestos con­solari.. Consolation of those who were ready to faint, Thou hast strengthned the feeble knees.

Here you see the four uses, which Job made in his counsels; First, 2 Tim. 3. 16. of Instruction; Secondly, of Exhortation; Thirdly, of Admoni­tion; Fourthly, of Consolation: Job was a perfect Preacher, he applyes the word to all the services and ends of it, respecting the severall conditions, tempers, or distempers, of those with whom he had to doe.

Further, some take the three latter to be, but as explications or branches of the first; Behold thou hast instructed many, namely, concerning the nature of afflictions, and their duty in the bearing afflction; yea, thou hast instructed them so farre, that thou hast strengthned the weake hands, upholden those that were falling, and strengthned the feeble knees.

I come now to the opening of the severall expressions.

Thou hast instructed many.] The word which we translate in­structed, [...] E [...]udivit, ca­stigavit ut pa­tres & praecep­toris solent pu­eros. Respondet Graecorū [...] docere verbi. & ver­beribus. signifieth both to correct and to teach; and the Hebrews give the reason of it, because usually with instruction, correction is joyned; and so the same Greek word signifies both to teach and to chasten: As there is a voice of the Rod, instruction in correction, so a Rod sometimes goes with the voice, correction is helpfull to instruction: In either or both the senses, we may understand it here, thou hast instructed many, thou hast taught and directed, thou hast (where need was) chastned and corrected many.

Many.] We have heard in the first Chapter, that Job prayed for his Children, for his Sonnes and Daughters; but now we see Jobs piety extended further, than his own children. Yea, the word may well be carried out, beyond his own family. He prayed for his children, and not only did he pray for them, but also teach and in­struct them, and not only them, but others, he inlarges his Schoole, he instructs many; it is an indefinite word, a word of number without a number. Jobs Schoole of holy discipline was a large one, [...] Debilis, laxus, hinc Rephaim significat mer­tuos, ex eo quod in illis omne ro­bur & vires naturales elan­guerunt. he set up his Schoole where ever he came; he was an univer­sall Teacher, an Apostle of the old World; thou hast instructed many.

And thou hast strengthned the weak hands.]

The word signifies, Remisse hands, or the hands that hang down, loose and lax. Hence by a Metaphor it notes one, that is negligent [Page 10] or idle; a man with his hands hanging down and his armes loose, is the embleme of idlenesse or of sadnesse. Thou hast strengthned the Manus l [...]ssae & dejecta b [...]ach [...]a pertinent ad ha­b [...]um aut mol­liter aut segni­ [...]er ambulantis, aut cur [...]ere non valenti [...]. E contra vero adducere brachia, manus comprimere, fortiter j [...]ctare cubi [...]os, strenue currentis est. weak hands; that is, those that were idle or grieved, negligent or dejected. Hence the word (Rephaim) is used, to signifie those that are dead; and the re [...]son is, because all strength, naturall vigour and activity depart, when life departeth: Giants also are expres­sed in the Hebrew by this word, because they are such dreadfull persons, that their very aspect or sight terrifies the spirit, makes the hands hang down and the knees of beholders feeble; they called those mighty men, weake, from that effect wrought upon others; because they made others weak and tremble at their approaches. Hence, when Goliah the Giant challenged and defied the Hoast of Israel, it is said, that all the men of Israel when they saw the man, fled from him, or fled from his face (he overcame them with his looks) and were fore afraid, 1 Sam. 17. 24.

This weaknesse of hands (as we finde instanc'd in Scripture) ari­ses four wayes.

First, from sloth and idlenesse (as we noted before) some have strong heads, but they have weak hands, they are sufficiently in­structed, but they cannot act, or they are unactive, and an unactive man is a weak-handed man.

Secondly, weaknesse of the hands cometh from fear, and so that phrase, to strengthen the hands, notes incouraging of a person, as Zech. 8. 9, 13. Fear not, let thy hands be strong; that is, let not fear weaken thy hands: and Jer. 38. 4. the Princes came to the King and begg'd of him that Jeremiah might be put to death; and they give the reason from this, For (say they) he weakneth the hands of the men of war that remaine in the City, and the hands of all the people; that is, he discourages them, makes them believe they shall never be able to stand out against the King of Babylon, but that he shall cer­tainly take the City; this is called weakning of their hands: So Isa. 35. 3. Strengthen ye the weak hands and confirme the feeble knees, say to them that are of a fearfull heart, be strong, fear not. So yee see, weaknes of the hands is caused by fear; when the bands of the heart are dissolved (as it were) and loosned by fear, the hand must needs be dissolved and loosned from labour; the hand is not able to work at all, when fear works much upon the heart.

Thirdly, weaknesse of the hands ariseth from irresolution, when a man is not resolved what to do, not setled upon a busines, then his hands are weak. Hence it was the counsell of Achitophel to Ab­salom, [Page 11] that he should go up upon the house top, in the sight of all Israel, and abuse his fathers Concubines; and he giveth the reason of it, then (saith he) shall the hands of all that are with thee be 2 Sam. 16. 21. strong; his meaning is, then they will be so resolved to stick to thee, that they will doe their utmost; he grounds his counsell upon the present irresolution of the people, he doubted whether Absaloms party would adhere cordially to him or no, therefore (saith he) doe an act which may render thy selfe and all that are with thee irre­concileable to the King; this will unite them to thee, and their hands will be strong. If once they be out of hope to be receiv'd into the Kings favour, thou maist be out of feare, that they will returne to the Kings obedience. In any lawfull and good designe it is best to raise up resolution and ingage it to the highest. Where the heart is strongly resolved, the hands will act strongly. The reason why men are slow and dull in great undertakings, is, because they are off and on, full of neutrality and indifferency, in what they undertake. Unsetled spirits can never settle actions. A double minded man is James 1. 8. unstable (and weak-handed) in all his wayes.

Lastly, there is a weaknesse of the hands (which is I conceive most proper to this place) arising from sorrow and griefe; from the weight and burthen of affliction, or from a sudden surprise of trouble. As it is said of Balteshazar (Dan. 5. 6.) who seeing the hand-writing upon the plaister of the wall, presently changed coun­tenance, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joynts of his loynes were loosed, and his knees smote one against another.

Thou hast strengthned the weake hands; that is, those whose hands are weak by reason of manifold trialls and tribulations: thou hast spoken words to them, which have been as sinewes to their hands, annd strength unto their joynts. In this sence the Apostle uses both the expressions of the Text, Heb. 12. 6. where having treated about the nature of afflictions, together with the fruit and benefit of them, he concludes thus, wherefore lift up the hands which hang down and the feeble knees; as if he should say, it is pro­bable that affliction hath made your hands hang downe, that sor­row and grief have loosned your spirits and your loynes too, there­fore now be of good cheer, lift up your hands that hang down, and the feeble knees. Thie Symptome or effect of sorrow is elegantly Columbis pr [...] cantu gemitus est & inamoenū murmur. Sanct. in Ezek. cap 7. described, Ezek. 7. 17. where the Prophet having shewed that ma­ny should mourne as Doves of the Valleys, adds, all hands shall be fee­ble and all knees shall be weak as water.

Thy words have upheld him that was falling.] Some afflictions lie so hard and heavie upon us, that they doe not only weaken, but cast downe: Job stood ready to uphold such as were ready to fall; timely advice may catch a man before he is quite down, and pre­vent his fall.

The word which we translate falling, signifies in its first sense, to [...] from [...] Impingere & quod saepe con­sequitur ruere, cadere. stumble or strike the foot against a thing, and so it is put for that which is the consequent of stumbling, falling: he that strikes his foot or stumbles at a thing, is in danger of a fall. So Isay 40. 30. The young men shall utterly fall, it is this word, but doubled, falling they shall fall, that is, they shall utterly fall. There is a threefold falling mentioned in Scripture.

1. There is a falling into sinne, Gal. 6. 1. If a man be overtaken [...] Prae­cipuè significat peccata actua­lia, à [...] & [...], ad verbum praeter cadere, cū scil. ultra rectam justitiae lineam cadimus, de erratis etiam levioribus usur­patur, [...] in compositione minuit sensum. in a fault: that word (like this Hebrew in the Text) signifies, a fall taken by stumbling or by tripping upon any thing, that lies in the way. In this sense we understand the fall of Adam, the fall of An­gels, and the fals of the Saints.

2. There is a falling into affliction, a falling into trouble: So Prov: 24. 16. The just man falleth seven times a day; that is, he meets affliction at every turn, he fals into trouble almost at every step. Seven times a day, is very often in the day, or often every day.

3. There is a falling under trouble. And of persons falling so, we are chiefly to understand this Text. Many fall into trouble, who yet (through the strength of Christ) stand firmely under trouble. Others no sooner fall in, but they fall under it. The shoulders of some are not able to beare a light affliction, and the afflictions of others are so heavie, that no shoulders are able to beare them; the back breaks, the spirit sinkes under the load.

To such as these Job lent his hand, his shoulders: his counsell was as a staffe in their hands, as ligaments to their loynes and knees. Job was well skill'd in setting props and buttresses of holy advice, to such tottering soules. Thou hast upheld him that was falling. We may take the words in all, or either of these three in­terpretations, yet most properly of the latter.

Thou hast strengthned the feeble knees. The Hebrew word for a knee signifieth (in the root) to blesse or to pray, because in bles­sing [...] Genu quod fle­cti solet in Be­nedictionibus et salutationibus. and praying for one, or in saluting, we use to bow the knee. And here, what we translate the feeble knees, is word for word the bowing knees; because when knees bow and buckle or double un­der [Page 13] us, it proceeds from weaknesse and feeblenesse: hence the bow­ing knee is called the feeble knee. Dan. 6. 5. it is said of Belshazzar, his knees smote one against the other; he fainted, his spirits sanke within him, then his knees (as a Symptome of his feare) beat one against another. The hanging down of hands, notes a kinde of de­spaire in regard of present evils: and feeble quaking knees, seeme to referre to some expected evill. Taking the words with that dif­ference, Jobs work of love appears more full; he not only upheld in present troubles, but labour'd to strengthen against such as were to come. Thou hast instructed many, and instructed them many, even all these wayes. We may note.

First, That to teach, instruct, and comfort others, is not onely a mans duty but his praise, for here Eliphaz speaks it in a way of commendation, though with an intent to ground a reproofe upon it. Job himselfe speaks of what he had done in that kinde, as a de­fence of his own innocence, Chap. 29. vers. 21. &c. Ʋnto me men gave eare and waited, and kept silence at my counsell, after my words they spake not againe, and my speech dropped upon them; and they waited for me as for the rain, and they opened their mouth wide, as for the latter rain. This was his practise, and this was the praise of Job. That which the Apostle speaks as a speciall qualifi­cation or gift of a Bishop, 1 Tim. 3. 2. is an excellent, a noble quali­fication [...]. in any person, of what rank or degree soever, to be apt to teach.

Secondly, Consider who Job was; he was a holy man, one that had much acquaintance and communion with God. Now though his friends mistook what was in his heart, yet they hit right upon his practise; and we knowing both what his heart was, by the te­stimony of God: and what his practise was, from the testimony of men, may ground a second point upon it. That such as know God in truth and holinesse, are very ready to communicate the know­ledge Quae autem est ce [...]or eleemo­syna, quod ma­jus opus mise­recordiae, quam docere rudes segnes ad bene agendum exti­mulare, laben­tem erigere, maestos cons [...] ­lari. of God unto others. They who know God themselves, are desirous that others should know God too. David (Psal 51. 13.) promiseth and professeth, that he would communicate his experi­ences of Gods love, in pardoning his sinne, when he had tasted the sweetnesse of a pardon. Then will I teach transgressors thy wayes, and sinners shall be converted unto thee: when my heart hath learned more of God, others shall learne more of God from my mouth. This is spirituall charity, and it is the most excellent and noblest charity of all. Charity to the soule is the soule of charity, [Page 14] charity to the better part, is the best charity. In this sence also Job was eyes to the blinde, and feet to the lame, by guiding them to see, Job 29. 15. and by directing their feet to walk, in the wayes of God. To give knowledge is better then to give Gold. Instruction is the highest almes.

Thirdly, if we consider Job (of whom all this is affirmed) as he was a great rich man, we may note thus much; That honourable and great men, loose nothing of their honour and greatnesse by de­scending to the instruction of others, though their inferiours. Some think it belongs onely unto Ministers to instruct; What we instruct? They resent it as a disparagement: they trust out that work wholly into the hands of others. Where shall we finde an Abraham (a great Prince in his time) of whom God gave this Te­stimony, I know him that he will command his children, &c. and they shall keep the way of the Lord: and because he was willing to teach others, God condescends to teach him: Shall I hide from Gen 18. 17, 18, 19. Abraham that thing which I doe. They receive most knowledge, who are most ready to impart it. And we finde before this, Abra­ham so successefull in teaching, that he had an Army of scholers in his house. The Text saith, when he prepar'd for that expedition to rescue his Nephew Lot, that he armed three hundred and eighteen [...] Gen. 14. 14. Prov. 22. 6. of his trained, catechized, or instructed servants. The word signi­fies, to train in the Principles of Religion, as well as in the postures of war: being the same used in the Book of Proverbs, for teaching a childe the first elements of holy knowledge. And that place of Genesis may very well comprehend both.

Fourthly observe, That charity, especially spirituall charity, is very liberall and open-hearted. Job instructed not onely his owne, but he instructed others, he instructed many; he did not confine his doctrine and his advice to his own walls, but the sound thereof went wheresoever he went; he instructed many. And if Job who had no special, no direct calling to it, were a teacher of many: what shall we think of those, whose calling and businesse it is to teach, and yet teach not any at all? their trade, their profession is to teach, yet they are so far from teaching many, that they teach none, and which is worse, they hinder teaching: they stop the mouth of the teacher, and (if they can) the eare of the learner, they take away the key of knowledge. They neither open the doore themselves, nor suffer those that would. This is the very spirit of wickedness. And blessed be God, whose mighty power hath so graciously cast out and [Page 15] dispossest so many places of the Kingdome of these wicked spirits.

Further, taking those other parts of his instruction, as they re­spect persons afflicted, who are here described by weak hands, and feeble knees, ready to fall, unable to stand.

Observe first, That sore afflictions doe exceedingly indispose for duty. Sore afflictions make weak hands and feeble knees: the weake hand and the feeble knee are (as I said before) em­blems of one unfit for any businesse; unfit to work, unfit to walk, when the hand is weak and the knee is feeble, what is a man fit for? Great sufferings unfit us for action. Hence it is that the Lord mo­derates the afflictions of his people, sweetens the bitternesse, and takes off the oppressing weight of them. God promiseth to come Isa. 57. 16. with reviving, and that he will not contend for ever with his peo­ple. Why? A principle Reason is, Lest their spirits should fail be­fore me, and the soules which I have made. Lest the spirits should faile; that is, lest they should faile in their duties: the spirit can­not faile in the essence of it, the spirit is of an eternall constitution; but it faileth in the duty often. And if afflictions lie too hard and too long upon a people, their spirits fail, their faith fails, their cou­rage failes, their labours cannot be laborious, to carry on and car­ry out their work. Therefore when Job saw any under afflictions, he endeavour'd to put courage into their hearts, and so strength in­to their hands.

Secondly, In the generall we may note further, That the words of the wise have a mighty power, strength, and prevalence in them. You see how efficatious the words of Job were; Jobs instructions were strengthuings, thou hast strengthned the weak hands and fee­ble knees; his words were as stays to hold them up, that were ready to fall: Eliphaz doth not only say, thou didst instruct many, & in in­structing thou didst intend, it was thy design and aime to strengthen the weak hands, but he speaks of what Job had effected & wrought; thy words put sinews into the hands and knees of men that were weak and ready to fall, thy words were as props to hold and bear up the spirits of those that were sinking. Words wisely dispensed and followed, with the blessing of God, what can they not doe? God doth the greatest things in the World by a word speaking? as at the first he made the world it selfe by a word speaking; so he hath done the greatest things, and wrought the greatest changes in the World, by a word speaking. When a word goes forth cloathed with the authority and power of God, it works wonders. How [Page 16] hath it raised up sinking spirits? how hath it made the fearfull un­daunted, and the weak-hearted couragious? God by his word in the mouth of a weak man overthrows the strong holds of sinne, and by a word brings every thought of man, into subjection to Je­sus 2 Cor. 10. 4. 5 Christ. By a word he stops the mouth of blasphemy, and evill speaking; by a word speaking, he makes a man deny himselfe; by a word he opens the eyes of the blinde, and makes the lame to run and leap like a Hart, in the way of holinesse.

And I could wish that the word which I now speak, might (through the blessing of God) have such an effect upon your spi­rits. O that it might strengthen all weak hands and feeble knees, O that it might uphold all who are ready to fall; we are cast upon knee-feebling, hand-weakning, yea, heart-weakning times: the sight of those things which our eyes do see, and the hearing of those things which our ears do heare, cause many to fear, and the spirits of some to fall. Now a word invested with commission from God, to go and comfort, will master all our sorrowes, and dispell all these fears. If the Lord breathe upon a word, that word will breathe lively activity into a very carkasse. Look to those many and gracious promises, made to those that mourne, and comfort will flow in. Promises are the treasures of comfort: promises hold the Churches stock, they are the patrimony of beleivers; it is their priviledge and their honour, to be called heirs of the promise. While Heb. 6. 17. Christ and the Promise lives, how can Faith dye, or languish, eying a promise.

So much of the first branch of the minor Proposition in the third and fourth Verses.

The second branch lies in the fifth Verse.

Now it is come upon thee, and thou faintest, it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled.

Thou hast instructed many, thou hast strengthned the weak hands, &c. but now it is come upon thee, &c. That is trouble and afflicti­on [...] Lassus fuit cor­pore vel animo, prae lassitudine nescivit quid ageret. are come upon thee.

And thou faintest.] The word signifies an extraordinary faint­ing; when a man is so wearied and spent, that he knowes not what he doth, when his reason seemes tired, as much as his strength. So that the words, Now it is come upon thee thou faintest, may import thus much; thou art in such a case, that thou seemest to be besides thy selfe, thou knowest not what thou doest, thou speakest, thou [Page 17] knowest not what. The word is translated in the first Verse by grieved: in other Scriptures by mad and furious. (Prov 26. 18.) As a mad-man who casteth fire-brands, &c. And whereas we say (Gen. 47. 13.) the land of Egypt fainted by reason of the famine, many render it, the land of Egypt was inraged or mad because of In sanivit terra Egypti, nan propter famem nimiam insa­nit homo. Furebat terra, i. e. tumultua­bantur anno quinto famis mentem ill [...]s adimente sane. Jun. in loc. the famine; want of bread turnes to want of reason, famine di­stracts. The Egyptians were so extreamly pinched with hunger, that it did even take away their wits from them, and scarcity of food for their bodies, made a dearth in their understandings. So there is this force in the word, Thou who hast given such wise and grave instruction unto others, from those higher principles of grace, now it is come upon thee, thou art even as a mad man, as a man distracted, not able to act by the common principles of reason.

It toucheth thee.] It is the same word which we opened before; the Devill desired that he might but touch Job, now his friend tel­leth him he is touched.

And thou art troubled.] That word also hath a great emphasis in [...] it. It signifies a vehement amazed trouble; as in that place (1 Sam. 28. 21.) where when the woman, the Witch of Endor had raised up Samuel (in appearance) as Saul desired, the Text saith, that when all was ended, she came unto Saul, and she saw, he was sore troubled: think what trouble might fall upon a man in such a con­dition as Saul was in, after this acquaintance with the visions of Hel, think what a deep astonishment of spirit seaz'd upon him, such dis­order of minde this word layes upon Job, Now it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled.

Observe hence first, To commend a man with a But, is a wound instead of a commendation. Thou hast instructed many, But, &c. How many are there who salute their friends very faire to their fa­ces, or speak them very faire behinde their backs, yet suddenly (as Joab to Amasa) draw out this secret Dagger, and stab their honour and honesty to the heart. As it is said of Naaman, 2 Kings 5. 1. He was an honourable man, and a mightie man of valour, but he was a Leper. So, &c.

Observe secondly, Great afflictions may disturbe the very seat of reason, and leave a Saint in some acts, below a man. Some acts of holinesse represent the Saints as mad-men to carnall men. So Paul appeared to Festus, and so to many of his Corinthians, 2 Ep: cap. 5. v. 13. For whether we be besides our selves it is to God. Workings of Grace are sometime so farre above reason, that they [Page 18] seem to be without reason. So some acts of infirmity represent the Saints to carnall men, as mad-men. A gracious man works so much below reason sometimes, that he seems to be without reason.

Thirdly, note, That when we see any one doing ill, it is good to minde him of the good which he hath done. Eliphaz saw Job fainting, enraged as a mad-man, or as a man astonished, he tels him of the wise and grave counsell and instruction he had given before, consi­der what thou hast done. As in the Revelation Christ speaks to the Church of Ephesus, (Rev: 2. 5.) Remember from whence thou art fallen, and do thy first works; vvhen the Church did ill, then he tels her, what she had formerly done well. So the Apostle, Ye did runne well, having begun in the Spirit, will ye end in the flesh: vvhen he saw them runne upon fleshly ceremonies and ordinances, ye began in the spirit (saith he) consider that, and end as ye began. As in dis­pute and reasoning, a false conclusion cannot be derived from true premises, so neither can it in practise or in living. Holy premises conclude in holinesse. He never began well, that ends ill.

Fourthly, observe, That the good we have done is a kinde of re­proach to us when we doe the contrary evill. When a mans latter actions contradict his former, or when his actions contradict his professions, the former good is a staine or blemish to him; It had 2 Pet. 2. 21. been better for them not to have knowne the way of righteousnesse, then after they have knowne it, to turn from the holy commandement given unto them.

Further, take this likewise, It is an easier matter to instruct others in trouble, than to be instructed or take instruction our selves in our own troubles. Even Job, holy Job could give those counsels of pati­ence, and meeknesse, and quietnesse under the hand of God, which he could not follow to the full, when it fell upon himselfe. For though he did not faile to that height, which Eliphaz implyeth in this reproofe, yet faile he did. He had set others a Copie, which he could not write by or imitate when his own turn came. A good man may quickly give counsell, above his own strength to practise.

Observe lastly, It is a shame for us to teach others the right way, and to goe in the wrong our selves. Eliphaz seekes to shame and convince Job upon this very ground, thou hast done thus and thus, thou hast taught others patience, and thou art mad thy selfe: art thou not ashamed to complain and cry out of thy afflictions, when thou hast bid others be quiet and cheerfull under them? It is an ex­cellent thing when our words are made visible, by our actions: as [Page 19] he said in the Church story, The faith which is seene, is a great deale better, than the faith which is heard; so we may say in ano­ther kinde, the wisdome which is seen in bearing of affliction, is far better than the wisdome which is heard. Physitian heal thy selfe. He saved others, himselfe he cannot save, say the Jewes to Christ. Man may justly be reproved with, thou teachest others, thy selfe Turpe est docto­rem cum culpa redarguit ip­sum. thou canst not teach. When the same fault which we reprehend in others, may be reprehended in our selves, our fault is doubled, and the act not only sinfull, but shamefull. The Apostle convinces the Jewes mightily by this Argument, Rom. 2. 19. Thou art confident that thou thy selfe art a guide of the blinde, a light of them which are in darknesse, an instructer of the foolish, &c. Thou takest upon thee all this, Thou therefore (saith he) that teachest another, teachest thou not thy selfe? thou that preachest a man should not steale, dost thou steale? He goes on, pressing it upon them, as matter of shame and blushing that their actions ranne so crosse and contradictory to their own professions.

Thus we have opened the minor proposition or assumption of the first Argument, couched in these two Verses; thou hast com­forted, instructed, and taught many, yet when trouble commeth upon thee, thou knowest not how to order thy selfe. Is not this thy feare, thy confidence, the uprightnesse of thy wayes, and thy hope? Thus he gathers the conclusion, and from hence inferres Job a hy­pocrite in Religion, or irreligious.

Is not this thy feare &c?] As if he had said, thy feare, thy con­fidence, thy uprightnesse, thy hope, thy religion, call it what thou wilt, is but thus much, or is but this.

Is not this thy feare?] In the first Verse of the first Chapter 'twas shewed what the feare of God is; part of Jobs character be­ing thus given, A man fearing God. Now Eliphaz by this first point of his Interrogatories, taxes Job, in the first part of his character or commendation, Thou art reported to be a man fearing God, is not this thy feare?

Feare is taken either for the whole compasse of Gods worship, or for that awfulnesse of affection with which we worship God, which we ought to mingle and mix in all our actions and duties. Therefore (saith the Apostle, Heb. 12.) Let us have grace to serve him with reverence and godly feare. And Psalme the second, Serve the Lord with feare. God is to be served in love, and yet God loves no service which hath not this ingredient, Holy feare.

Feare is the most proper affection which we creatures, dust and ashes who are at such an infinite distance from God, can put forth in his worship. God condescends so farre as to be loved by us, yea he calleth for our love as a friend, or as a father, as a familiar, as one in neer relation: but considered in his Majesty, glory, and great­nesse, feare is the most suitable affection in our approaches unto God. The name of God in some languages, is derived from feare, and God is expresly called Fear by Jacob, Gen. 31. in that dispute with Laban, where he telleth him, Except the fear of his father Isaac had been with him, &c. Verse 42 And Jacob sware by the fear of his father Isaac, Verse 53. that is, by that God whom his father Isaac feared: Jacob was a man so holy, that he would take nothing into his mouth to swear by, but onely the holy Name of God. Reli­gious swearing is one of the highest acts of worshipping, as vaine swearing is one of the highest acts of prophaning the name of God.

Thy confidence.] The word which we translate confidence, sig­nifies [...] Inconstantia, levitas per An­tiphrasin, con­stantia, consi­den [...]ia. also and that most properly, folly, inconstancy, levity; when the Prophet Jeremy reproveth the idolatry of those times, & speaks to worshippers of Idols, he expresses it by this word, They are al­together bruitish and foolish, Jer. 10. 8. And holy David (Psalme 49. 13.) speaking of wicked men, who make riches their portion, and who lay out all their endeavours, in the raising of an outward estate, gives this account of their practise in the 13 Verse, This their way is their folly: this is the course that worldly men take, and they think it is a very wise course, but indeed their way is their folly. Some translators reade that text, this their way is their con­fidence, as here in Job; and so they make the sense out thus; this way of worldly men in gathering riches, in heaping up abundance of these outward things, is their confidence, that is, they have no­thing else to trust unto, they have nothing beyond the world to trust unto this their way is their confidence. So againe, Prov. 15. 26. A foolish man or a man of folly despiseth his mother. And once [...] more, Psal. 85. 8. where the Psalmist goeth up like Habakkuk to his Watch-tower to hearken for an answer of his prayer, I will hearken what the Lord will say, for he will speake peace unto his peo­ple, but let them not returne againe to folly. So some reade it in this Text of Job, is not this thy fear, thy folly? that is, was it not meere folly for thee to bragge and boast of thy feare. sc. That thou didst feare God, &c.

But the word is often taken in a contrary sense, as we translate, for constancy or confidence, and sometimes for hope; and thus Job 31. 24. If I have said to gold, thou art my hope, or my confidence; and Chap. 8. 14. speaking of the Hypocrite, whose hope shall be cut off, the same word is used; and Prov. 3. 26. The Lord shall be thy confidence, and he shall keep thy foot from being taken; and (not to heape many places) Psal. 78. 7. That they may set their hope in God. In this sense it is generally understood here, Is not this thy fear and thy confidence, sc. all the trust thou hast placed in thy God.

Feare and confidence are acts of naturall worship. Confidence or Trust is the resting of the soule upon another, here the resting of the soule upon the Word, or promises of God, upon the power, faithfulnesse, and truth of God: an act thus put forth by the soule, is confidence. Now saith Eliphaz, is not this thy confidence? thou hast spoken much of resting and trusting upon God and his Word, upon his power and faithfulnesse; is not this that which thou hast all this while talked of? See what a goodly confidence it is! Doth it look like a proper piece of grace?

Confidence is an act beyond faith; a soule confiding walkes in a higher Region of grace and comfort than a soule only believing; there may be believing, where there is not this confiding. As pati­ence is hope lengthned, so confidence is hope strengthned. Assu­rance is the highest degree of faith, and confidence is the highest degree of assurance. It carries with it, first cheerfulnesse opposite to sorrow; secondly courage, opposite to fear and despondency of spirit; thirdly, boldnesse & adventurousnesse opposite to cowardice. Confidence having a good cause and a good call, will take a Beare by the tooth, or a Lion by the beard. Fourthly, it notes boasting, or a kinde of spirituall wise bragging, opposite to sinfull modesty or concealement of what God hath done for us. Or take it thus. Con­fidence is the noblest exercise of faith, which looking steadily upon God in himselfe, and in Christ, through the promises, raises the soule above all fears and discouragements, above all doubts and dis­quietments, either about the removing of evill, or the obtaining of good.

Hence confidence is well called the rest of the soule, therefore such as attaine to confidence are said to be in peace, in perfect peace. Isay 26. 3. Him wilt thou establish in perfect peace, whose heart doth trust up­on thee. And this act of confidence or trust is proper and peculiar [Page 22] to God, no creature must share in it. This is worship commanded in the first precept, Thou shalt have no other Gods before mee. Whatsoever we confide in unlesse it be in subordination unto God, we make it our God. And it is one of the highest acts of the soule, not onely as we respect the taking in, our own comforts, but also the giving out, glory unto God. This confidence is well coupled with holy feare, the more we feare God so, the more we trust him; such feare is the mother and nurse of confidence: But confidence is directly contrary, yea contradictory to carnall feare; he that trusts God indeed, leaves both soule and body, temporall and eter­nall estate with him, without ever sending a fearefull thought, or a jealous looke after either. It followes:

And the uprightnesse of thy wayes.] It is the word used in the description of Job, Cap. 1. 1. There it is in the concrete, perfect, here in the abstract, uprightnesse: We may reade it, Is not this the perfection of thy wayes? Uprightnesse is the Saints perfection [...] a [...] Linea regula, sic veteres He braei deducunt. Videtur Moses non sine magna emphasi hoc verbum usur­passe, nimirum ad experimen­dam infinitam verbi Dei po­tentiam, qui fl [...]xum illud & vagum ele­mentum, totam superficiem [...]e [...] ­rae occupans tanquam ad amussim & perpendiculum in unum loc [...]m coegit Paulus Fagi­us, in prim. eaput Gen. in this life. Uprightnesse may have a double notion, First, as it respects the sincerity of our hearts towards God; Secondly, as it respects the justice and equity of our actions, towards man. In both senses we may extend it here; Thou hast been reported for a per­fect man, now if thou art perfect in thy being thou wouldest be perfect in thy working; if thou wert upright in thy nature, thou wouldest be upright in thy actions; Now consider thy uprightnesse or perfection, is not this the perfection of thy wayes? is not this all, even that lately discovered in thy impatient complai­nings?

And thy hope.] That word is derived two wayes. First from a root which siguifieth a line, rule or measure; so in Gen. 1. 9. Let the waters under the Heavens be gathered together into one place, the word signifies a gathering together by rule, as if God by that act, had measured out the water (that unruly, turbulent, wandring element) and had brought it into compasse, by a rule or line, which it could not exceed or goe beyond, without permission or commis­sion from himselfe: thereby giving us a mighty proof of his almigh­ty power and infinite wisdome. So some translate the word here, taking it to be derived from that roote, Is not this thy rule? Is not this the rule, that thou hast heretofore walked by, whatsoever thou hast pretended? is not this the uprightness of thy wayes the course or measure by which thou hast directed, squared thy actions?

But secondly, rather the word is derived from (Kavah) which [...] [Page 23] signifieth to expect, hope or waite: and it notes a very vehement Expectavit. Significat mag­na intentione & corporis e­rectione expe­ctare, at (que) id est quod Paulus Graeco verbo dicit [...]. intention both of body and of minde, in waiting, expecting or ho­ping; when a man waites (as it were) stretching forth his spirit or his minde, putting himselfe out exceedingly to hope or waite for a thing Psal. 37. 9. and Isa. 8. 17. the same vvord is used with the same emphasis. And that Greek word vvhich the Apostle Paul hath (Rom. 8. 19.) comes up fully to it, The earnest ex­pectation of the creature, &c. So the meaning here may be thus con­ceived, Is not this thy hope, or thy earnest expectation? Is it not come to this now? Thou hast boasted much of thy hope, what treasures thou hadst laid up in that, beyond all thy present posses­sions, is not all shrunk up to this, yea changed into despaire? thy desperate speeches give me ground to thinke so. Is not this thy hope? So much for the words.

There are foure interpretations given of this Verse. First, Some make out the sense, by a different construction of the first particle in the Hebrew, which, they translate, not (as we) Is not? but [...] where is? so the vulgar and divers others, reading it thus, Where is thy feare and thy confidence, thy patience and the perfection of thy wayes? As if he had said, what's become of all those graces, of which thou hast spoken, and with which thou hast been reported to be most richly endowed? where are they at this time? in this day of thy trouble, in this day of thy tryall? Taking the words in that sense, they yeeld us these Observations. First,

That times of trouble are speciall times for the use of our graces. It is as if Eliphaz had said, Thou thy selfe and all that knew thee have spoken much of thy grace, but now is the time to use it, where is it? shew it me now, where is thy feare and thy confidence? if a man have been reported very skilfull at his weapon, when he comes into danger, then is the time to shew his skill: and we may say to him, where is thy skill now? where is thy art now? so we say to a man that hath had store of Weapons and Armes in his house, when the enemy approaches, where is your Sword now? where's your Gun? where's your Artillerie? So here, Now, that thou hast most need of thy graces, where are they? bring them forth, are they to seek now? Is thy righteousnesse as the morning dew, and as a cloud vanished away? Times of trouble will put every grace to a stresse; and we had need looke to it, that we have not our graces to seek, when we have most need to use them; that when it shall be said unto us, where is your faith? where's your [Page 24] hope? we may be able to hold them forth, and answer the que­stion in our actions, here they are, here is my feare, here is my con­fidence, here is my hope, here is my uprightnesse; I can make proofe of them, and render them visible in my life: I can (through the strength of Christ) act them, and walke according to the rule of every one of these graces.

Secondly, From the ground of this argument, which is, that true grace holds out and perseveres unto the end: For hereby (saith Eliphaz) I will convince thee for an hypocrite, and that thy grace is but a shadow of grace, because it is decayed and gone. This being the ground of conviction by these words, where is thy feare? Observe,

That false grace, or a shew of grace, failes us when we have most need of it. A hypocrite seemes to stand in grace, till he falls into trouble. When good is in sight, he supposes he hath a great stock of faith; He is joyfull in beleiving any thing, when nothing pinehes him: And when he enjoyeth what he desired, he hopes as much as is promised: But when outward comforts are with­drawn and ecclipsed, when he must live upon a word, and releive himselfe upon invisibles, when he hath nothing in the creature to support him, and must trust what he cannot see: then this phancie of faith, this vaine hope, and pretended confidence disappeare, and where are they? how much charitie will some make profes­sion of untlll a reall object of charitie present it selfe? then excuses are made, they have but little for themselves, times are hard they may be suddenly cast into streights▪ they know not what a day may bring forth. False charity, and false hope vanish when they should act their parts, and make good what they have professed. As Christ speakes of the two houses, Matth. 7. One built upon the rock, the other upon the sand: these two houses were alike skil­fully and strongly built in all appearance; while the Sunne shone, and the weather was faire, none could discerne, but that the house upon the sand, was built as well, and might have stood as long as the other upon the rock; but when the raine fell, and the floods came, when the windes blew and beate upon the house, then it fell, the foundation failed, and all the faire superstructions came downe into the dust Where is the hypocrite with all his faith and feare in a wet windy day? is he not like a house founded on the sand? Or is not he and his goodly outside of holy feare and hope like the Apples of Sodome (reported in Historie) which are faire [Page 25] to the eye, but touch them and they crumble to ashes in your hand, so is the faith and the feare, the hope and confidence of hypocrites: Where are these? they are no where, for they never were.

Take the words in a second construction, and so they are thus rendred, Is not thy feare thy confidence? and the uprightnesse of thy wayes thy hope? So Mr Broughton, Is not thy Religion thy hope? and thy right wayes thy confidence? and then the sense is, as if Eliphaz had thus spoken unto Job, Doth it not now plainely appeare, that Satan charged thee rightly, that thou servest God for ends of pro­fit and outward comforts, seeing thou art thus impatient and un­quiet, when the hand of God takes away thy profit and outward comforts? Is it not a cleare argument, that thou heretofore didst obey God, only to gaine by him, or because thou wast confident he would protect and save thee harmlesse, he would blesse and pro­sper thee with encrease? Was not the uprightnesse of thy wayes this hope? that is, diddest thou not looke to thrive by upright deal­ing with men, and faire carriage in all thy actions? thou hadst no love to Religion, none to Justice, thy love was to thy purse, thy profit; and thou didst beleeve, at least hope, that profit would come in at the doore of the Sanctuary, or else thou hadst never gone so often thither. This is the second sense, praedicating the first terme of the second, Is not thy feare thy confidence? and is not thy uprightnesse thy hope? surely 'tis. This is a faire exposition of the words, and from it we may observe. That,

A hypocrites profession of Religion is grounded on his confidence to gaine by it. Is not thy feare thy confidence? thy Religion was nothing else but a hope to be rich. It was Satans objection, and now Eliphaz (resuming and managing Satans argument) makes it his conviction. And it is a truth in the generall thesis, that the Religion or the feare of hypocrites, is nothing but their confidence; they consider the word of promise, which God hath given to those that serve him; they in their thoughts surveigh the land of pro­mise, and tast the milke and honey of it: they reade that God will give both grace and glory, and no good thing will he withhold from them that walke uprightly, therefore that they may be under the influence of these promises, or upon a confidence that they shall receive golden showers out of these pretious promises, and digge aboundant treasure out of these heavenly mines, they feare and worship God, they are upright in their wayes, and honest in their dealings among men: Christ found it was love to the loaves, not [Page 26] to his doctrine, which brought so many after him, Joh. 6. They liked a miracle to feed them, more than a Sermon to instruct them: And were affected with the meate which endures to everlasting life, onely in subordination to the meate which perisheth. How many say, at least in their hearts, at this day, if I cast my selfe into such and such courses of holinesse, shall I not have credit and cu­stome, good acquaintance and profitable correspondence? In many men their wickednesse is their confidence, that is, the very reason why they are so wicked, is, because they are confident they shall get by their wickednesse; So those entisers said to the young man, (Prov. 1. 11.) Come let us lay waite for blood, Ego furtum fa­cere volui nulla compuisus ege state sed fasti­dio justitiae; nec ea re srui volebam quam furto appete­bam, sed ipso furto & pec­cato. Aug. l. 3. Confess. c. 1. & paulo post. Eram gratis malus, amavi defectum me­um, non illud ad quod defi­ciebam. there was their wickednesse; now at the twefth verse, you shall finde, that the rise of their wickednesse was this confidence, we shall finde all precious treasure, we shall fill our houses with spoile. Some (I confesse) have such a spirit of wickednesse, that they are wic­ked for wickednesse sake: and they love the very sinne it selfe, more than the ends of profit or pleasure, which may possibly follow the sinne; but others act the sinne, out of confidence they shalll ad­vance themselves by it: And so there are many, so refined in their aymes and hightned in the wayes of holinesse, that they are holy for holinesse sake, and religious for religions sake; yet there is a generation, whose Religion is nothing but this confidence; I will cast in my lot with the godly, I will take their way, shall I not fill my house with treasure, and raise an estate by it? The Apostle speakes of such, (1 Tim. 6. 5.) Men supposing that gaine is god­linesse, and they are godly only that they may gaine by it. Where­as they whose hearts are perfect with God, love godlinesse, for Gods sake; and they are holy, not out of confidence of gaining by it, but out of a delight in acting of it; there is a beauty, an excel­lency in holinesse which takes their hearts; And they are above, not only this poore confidence, to be enriched by it; but also above that rich, that heavenly confidence, to be saved by it, to get Heaven by it. The feare of some, who are above the former, is yet but e­quall to this confidence; they see there is no other way to be sa­ved, to goe to Heaven but this. Now I say, holinesse in the height and purity of it, keepes under the respect of Heaven it selfe; it is so much above these things below, that it is above those things above: That is a second sense.

Thirdly, The words are understood by divers of the Hebrew writers, for a direct and simple assertion, and they give it thus. [Page 27] Will not, or would not thy feare be thy confidence? and the upright­nesse of thy wayes thy hope? As if Eliphaz had thus said unto him; Job thou hast pretended much holinesse and Religion, feare and up­rightnesse: why art thou so disquieted, now, that the hand of God is upon thee? why art thou so amazed under these sufferings? would not that feare be thy confidence? and would not that up­rightnesse of thy wayes be thy hope? surely it would, if thou hadst any such feare as thou pretendest: this feare would be thy confi­dence, and this uprightnesse thy hope; thou wouldest be very bold, and by hope cast Anchor upon the goodnesse and faithfulnesse of God, in the middest of all this storme: thy heart would be poised, setled and established, notwithstanding all these shakings. Would not thy feare be thy confidence? It would. Hence observe;

First, That they who feare most in times of peace, have most rea­son Timidum esse ad [...]ala pa­trand [...] genus est fortitudinis & fiduciae. to be confident in times of trouble. They who feare most (in one sense) feare least, they who feare God most, feare creatures least, and creature-troubles least. We have this point in so many words, (Prov. 14. 26.) In the feare of the Lord is strong confidence. The feare of the Lord is the cure of all other feares. They who are most fearefull of the evill of sinne, are most couragious among the evills of suffering. To be fearefull thus, raiseth the highest acts of confidence, Psal. 112. 7, 8. We reade of one that will not be a­fraid for any evill tidings, his heart is fixed; Who is this confident man? this fearelesse man? It is this divine coward (as we may call him,) you shall finde him so express'd, vers. 1. Blessed is the man that feareth God, he shall not be afraid for any evill tidings. Exod. 20. 20. When the people of Israel were much amazed and astoni­shed at the giving of the Law, Moses comes to cure them of that feare; but what is the medicine? Feare not, for God is come to prove you, and that his feare may be before your faces, that ye sinne not. As if he had said, when God hath put his feare into your hearts, such feares as these will be removed and vanish: when your hearts are filled with this feare of God, you will have confidence to heare, and see the thunder and lightning of Mount Sinai, you shall not feare, no not this terrible tempest, in which the Law it selfe is given. So when the people were in a feare another time, Samuel thus bespeakes them in that shaking fit, 1 Sam. 12. 20. Feare not, onely feare the Lord. If you will be confident in such a time as this (for by prayer he procured thunder and raine in that time of wheate-harvest) feare the Lord. The feare of the Lord will be our [Page 28] confidence in the wettest day, in the most tempestuous and stormy night that ever fell upon the secure, sinfull world. A man fearing God is the onely dread-nought.

Secondly, We may observe from the other branch, (for the sense is the same) And would not thy uprightnesse be thy hope? The uprightnesse of a mans wayes in good times, doth mightily strengthen his hope in evill times. When a man can looke back, and approve his heart to God, that he hath been upright in peace and plenty, how full of hope will he be in trouble and in wants? It was that which Hezekiah pleaded before God, in the day of his trouble and tryall, 2 King. 20. 3. I beseech thee O Lord, remem­ber how I have walked before thee in truth and with an upright and perfect heart. This was it, when he lay upon his sick-bed, and as he thought, upon his death-bed, that put life into him, and bare up his spirit.

A fourth interpretatian is taken from our reading: Is not this thy feare, thy confidence, the uprightnesse of thy wayes, and thy hope? So the words containe foure distinct affrming Questions, Is not this thy feare? Is not this thy confidence? Is not this the uprightnesse of thy wayes? and is not this thy hope? This is thy feare, &c. As if Eliphaz had said, Job, without doubt thou hast shewed all thy goodnesse at once; or, Is not this all that thou art able to make out and shew? Is not this all that thou canst say for, all the testi­mony thou canst give of, thy religion and holinesse? Hast thou not shewed all? Surely thy great boast of Religion is nothing but this. Eliphaz seemes to call Job to make a further or cleerer proofe of his grace; Is not this thy feare? or if this be not, shew me some­what else: Thou art a man very famous in the world, much talked of, and highly commended, for feare and for confidence, for up­rightnesse and for hope; what hast thou more to answer that re­port, and save thy own credit, with the credit of thy friends, who have been so large in their commendations of, and testimonies con­cerning thee? Note hence;

First, Afflictions discover that unto us, which before we knew not. Is not this thy feare? thou diddest not know of what make or constitution thy feare was, untill now: That's Eliphaz his sup­position; and it is a truth; That some hypocrites know not, that their graces are false, till they are brought to such tryals. They carry false, counterfeit coine about them, and suppose it currant money, till they come to the ballance, or a touch-stone. Some are [Page 29] active hypocrites, who go about, intentionally to deceive and put a faire mask over a filthy face Others are passive hypocrites, who are miserably deceived by the collusions of Satan, and the base treache­ry of their own spirits. Many a man is brought to see (which before he could not, by reason of those mists of hypocrisie) what his feare is, what his faith, by those changes which affliction works in him.

Secondly thus. We ought to make our graces visible in our actions. Is not this thy feare? Shew me what thy feare is, if this be not, make proofe of it; The Apostle bids Timothy, 2 Tim. 4. 5. Make full proofe of his Ministery. It may be said to some Mini­sters, is not this your Ministery, if it be not, make full proofe of it; Or as the Apostle James, in a case neere this, James 2. 14. 18. Shew me thy faith by thy workes, so we may say, Shew me thy feare by thy workes. Is not this it? if it be not, make it ap­peare what it is; The tree is knowne by the fruits; doe men gather grapes of thornes, or figgs of thistles? or, doe men gather crabs from vines, or sloes from figg-trees? As an evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit, so neither doth a good tree bring forth evill fruit. If thou sayest thou art a vine, make proofe of it, by the fruit thou bearest, or else I must conclude, thou art but a thorne or a thistle. We may question many for this grace, and for the other grace they pretend unto: For their actions have not the least print or impression of such graces upon them; If any one should hold forth much faith and confidence in God, and this man should run or take unlawfull courses, to helpe himselfe, might we not say, Is this thy confidence? Or if one speaking much of confidence in God, for the accomplishing of a businesse should yet sit still, and doe nothing himselfe, might we not say, Is this thy confi­dence? this is to tempt God, not to trust in him. Once more if a man should professe much confidence in God, and yet be taken up altogether about the creature, swallowed up with creature-thoughts, or swallowing in creature-delights, seeking to, and en­gaging this creature, and that creature, with neglect of God, may we not say, Is this thy confidence? Hope is an anchor of the soule, but thou art driven with every blast, in this thy hope? Hope makes Heb. 6. 1 [...]. not ashamed, but thou, either art, or oughtest to be ashamed, is this thy hope? The feare of the Lord is cleane, but thou art defiled, Rom. 5. 5. is this thy feare?

Then againe consider this, when Job carries himselfe thus in his trouble, Eliphaz telleth him, what is not this thy feare? thou art [Page 30] surely but an hypocrite, for if thy feare were true, it would have preserved thee from these impatient complainings and distempers. Hence observe;

That true feare, holy feare, preserves the soule, and keepes it ho­ly. Holy feare, is as a golden bridle to the soule, when it would runne out to any evill: It is like the bankes to the sea, which keepes in the raging waves of corruption, when they would overflow all. If thou haddest feare indeed thou wouldest never thus breake the bounds of patience. The feare of the Lord is to depart from evill, that's the definition of it; therefore if thou haddest any feare of God indeed, thou wouldest never have done this evill, Curse thy day. Prov. 14. 27. The feare of the Lord is a fountaine of life, to de­part from the snares of death; that is, either from sinne, which is spirituall death, or from damnation, which is prepetuall death; the feare of the Lord is a fountaine of life, to depart from both these snares of death; where this feare is not, we are ready to joyne with every evill, and so to fall into the jawes of every death. Abraham (Gen. 20. 11.) argues so, The feare of the Lord is not in this place, therefore they will kill me; when we perceive a bent of spirit, to devise evill, and a readinesse of the hand to practise it, (we may conclude) the feare of the Lord is not lodged in that heart.

Fourthly, observe, That trust, or confidence in God, settles the heart in all conditions. Is not this thy confidence? Thy confidence certainly is but a shadow, for if it had been reall, thou hast been established and upheld, notwithstanding all that weight of afflicti­on that lies upon thee. When there was an unquietnesse upon the soule of David, he first questions his soule about it, Why art thou disquieted O my soule; and then directs, trust in God, Psal. 42. 11. So the Prophet promiseth, (Isa. 26. 3.) Him wilt thou establish in perfect peace, whose heart doth trust upon thee. They that trust in the Lord shall be as mount Zion, Psal. 125. 1. He that is carried and tost thus about, with every winde of trouble and gust of sorrow, shewes he hath not cast out this anchor of hope, upon the Rock Je­sus Christ.

But here a question must be answered, for the cleering of all, and likewise for discovering the strength or weaknesse of this argu­ment brought by Eliphaz, in this particular case of Job. Eliphaz taxed Job with hypocrisie; because his graces did not act, or they did not act like themselves, like graces; he gave not proofe of them [Page 31] at that time. Hence the doubt is, Doe a mans fallings or declinings from what he was before, or what he did before, argue him insincere? Is there sufficient strength in this Argument for Eliphaz to say, Job thou hast been a comforter of others, thou hast profest much holi­nesse heretofore, and now thou art come to the triall, thou canst not make it out thy selfe; therefore thou hast no grace, therefore all thy religion is vaine.

For the resolving of that, I answer first, that the proposition is not simply true, that every one who faileth or declineth or falleth off from what formerly he was, or held forth, is therefore an Hypo­crite, or that his graces are false, and but pretences; there may be many declinings and failings, many breaches and backslidings, and yet the spirit upright. Indeed falling away and quite falling off, are an argument of insincerity and hypocrisie; for true grace is everla­sting grace, true holinesse endures for ever. Therefore we are here to consider, whence these failings were occasioned in Job, and how a failing may be exprest, and continue, so, as to conclude insinceri­ty or hypocrisie.

First, it was from a sudden perturbation, not from a setled reso­lution. Job was not resolvedly thus impatient and unruly: an un­expected storme hurri'd his spirit so violently, that he was not ma­ster of his own actions; Job had not his affections at command, they got the bridle (as it were) on their necks, and away they car­ried him with such force, that he was not able to stop or stay them.

Secondly, it came from the smart and sense of pain in his flesh, not from the perversnesse of his spirit. If the taint had been in his spirit, then Eliphaz had a ground, a certain ground to have argued thus against him.

Thirdly, Jobs graces were hid and obscured, they were not lost or dead; the acts were suspended, the habits were not removed; when the grace which hath been shewed, is quite lost, that grace was nothing but a shew of grace, painted feare, and painted confi­dence: but in Jobs case there was only a hiding of his graces, or a vaile cast over them.

Lastly, We must not say he fals from grace who falleth into sin; nor must it be concluded that he hath no grace who falls into a great sinne: It followes not, that grace is false, or none, because it doth not work like it selfe, or because it doth not sometimes work at all True grace workes not alwayes uniformly; though it be alwayes the same in it selfe, yet it is not alwayes the same in its ef­fects; [Page 32] true grace is alwayes alive, yet it doth not alwayes act, it retains life, when motion is undiscern'd. Wherefore they who doe not work like themselves, or do not work at all (for a time) in gra­cious wayes, are not to be concluded as having no grace, or nothing but a shew of grace.

And so much be spoken concerning this first Argument contai­ned in these six Verses, the conviction of Job, from his failing in the actings of his grace, the putting forth of that fruit which formerly he had born and shewed to the world.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 7, 8.

Remember I pray thee, who ever perished being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off?

Even as I have seen, they that plough iniquity, and sow wick­ednesse, reape the same.

IN these two Verses and the three following, Eliphaz coucheth and confirmeth his second Argument wherein he further bespat­ters the innocency of Job, and hopes to convince him of hypocri­sie. The Argument is taken from the constant experience of Gods dealings in the world, Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished be­ing innocent? We may give it in this forme.

Innocent persons perish not, righteous men are not cut off.

But Job, thou perishest, and thou art cut off. Therefore thou art no innocent or righteous person.

The major proposition is plaine in the seventh Verse; for that question, Who ever perished being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off? is to be resolved into this Negation, No inno­cent person ever perished, nor were the righteous ever cut off. And Eliphaz conceiveth this to be so clear a truth, that he challengeth Job to give one instance to the contrary, out of his own experience; he appeals to experience (which is a strong way of arguing) Re­member, I pray thee, who ever perished being innocent? shew me the man, and withall he professeth, that he could give many instan­ces or examples out of his own experience, that wicked men have perished and were cut off, this he doth in the eighth Verse, Even as I have seen, they that plough iniquity, and sow wickednesse, reap the same; which he inlarges in the three following Verses, by the [Page 33] blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his nostrils are they con­sumed, &c. This in generall for the summe and substance of the Argument.

We will now consider the words, and examine the strength of it in particulars.

Remember I pray thee.] He handleth Job tenderly in words, he speaks gently and winningly to him, Remember I pray thee. To remember noteth often in Scripture a serious consideration of things present, and before us, Eccles. 12. 1. Remember now thy Creator in the dayes of thy youth; that is, seriously bethink thy selfe at the present, of God and his wayes, and how thou oughtest to walk holily before him. But properly to remember, is the calling to minde of things which are past: and so Eliphaz in this place di­rects Job to search the Records; Goe and inquire into all the Mo­numents of Antiquity, look the Registers and Histories of the Ages past, and see if thou canst finde any such thing as this, A righteous man perishing.

Memory is the soules store-house, there we lay up Observations, and from thence fetch them out, as occasions invite. Hence Christ Matth. 12. 57. compareth every Scribe which is instructed for the kingdome of Heaven to a house-holder which bringeth forth out of his treasury things both new and old. This treasury is the memory, there holy truths and profitable examples are stored and reserved. Remember I pray thee.

In that Eliphaz sendeth Job back to former experiences, we may note, That it is our duty to lay up and record the dealings of God, whether publick or personall, whether with the godly or with the wicked. It is our duty to observe what God doth, Psal. 111. 4. He hath made his wonderfull works to be remembred; as if the Psalmist had said, God hath not wrought such great things in the world, whether respecting persons or Nations, that we should write them upon the water, or in the sand, which the next puffe of winde defaces and blowes out; but he hath made his won­derfull workes to be remembred; hee will have them written in brasse, with a pen of Iron, and with the point of a Diamond, that all ages may heare the judgements and loving kindnesses of the Lord; he hath made his wonderfull workes to be remembred, or he hath made them so, as that they are most worthy to be remembred. David was a great observer of experiences (Psal. 31. 35.) he telleth us, that he had (as it were) collected notes concerning Gods [Page 34] dealings all his dayes; and it is to the very point in hand, I have been young and now am old, yet never saw I the righteous forsaken; himselfe carefully observed the dealing of God in this Psalme: and in the next (Psal. 37, 35, 36.) he gives the like direction to others; thus I have done, doe you take the same course too, I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himselfe like a green Bay­tree; then he goes on, Mark the perfect man, and behold the up­right; I have considered the estate of wicked men, let all observe the estate of the godly; Mark the perfect man, and behold the up­right. The works of God expound his Word in his works his Word is often made visible. That's an excellent expression, Psal. 111. 7. The works of his hands are verity and judgement; The acts of God are verity, that is, God acts his own truths? As the works of our hands ought to be the verity and judgements of God, (every acti­on of a Christian should be one of Christs truths) so it is exactly with God himselfe, the works of his hands are his owne verity and judgements. When we cannot finde the meaning of God in his Word, we may finde it out in his works: his works are a Com­ment, an infallible Comment upon his Word.

Yet we must take this Caution; the dealings of God in the sur­face and outward part of them, appear sometimes contrary to his Word, contrary unto his promise, but they only appear so, they are never so. When a man reads a promise and finds much good stor'd up in it for the righteous, and then looks upon the state of the righ­teous, and seeth it full of evill; here is a seeming contrariety be­tween the Word and the Works of God, but it is onely a seeming contrariety, as we shall see somewhat further anon. Therefore in that Psalme 111. 2. where he saith, The works of God are verity and judgement, he addes, The works of God are sought out: if you will have the verity or judgement that is in the works of God, you must not only look upon the outside of them, but you must seek them out, studie them, studie them as you studie the Scriptures, and then you will finde out the meaning of them, and see how exactly they square with every part of the Word. Why doth Eliphaz send Job to ex­perience? the ground is this; the works of God are like the Word of God; therefore if thou canst not make it out by experience from his works, thou canst hardly make it out, as a Position from his Word, that righteous persons are cut off.

[Page 35] Remember now I pray thee, who ever perished being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off?

Here are foure termes to be opened, perished, cut off, innocent, righteous. We will consider first what we are to understand by pe­rishing, and by cutting off. Secondly, whom we are to understand by innocent and righteus persons. And then apply the whole sen­tence, by shewing wherein the truth of this proposition stands, that a righteous man or an innocent person cannot perish or be cut off.

The word which we translate perished, hath divers significati­ons. [...] First, a returning to nothing, an utter consumption, which is to perish as a beast, Psal. 49. 20. the Holy Ghost describing a man who is not acquainted with God in his great estate, compares him thus; Man being in honour, and not understanding (sc. the things of God) becommeth like the beasts that perish; not that he perish­eth as a beast doth, but he is like a perishing beast; the similitude is not in perishing, but in his qualities who perisheth, he hath but such qualities, he is (upon the matter) even of as grosse a temper as a perishing beast.

Secondly to perish signifies to dye. The dissolution of man, or the dis-union of soule and body, Isay 57. 1. is thus exprest, the righteous perish, that is, they dye, as it is explained afterward, they are taken away from the evill to come, they rest in their beds, sc. in their graves: so Matth. 8. 25. Master save us we perish, say the Disciples, when they thought they should all be drowned. Lord helpe us, or else we all dye presently: and so we translate Job 34. 15. where Elihu speaking of the power of God, thus describes it; If he should but shew himselfe, all flesh (saith he) shall perish together, that is, all flesh shall dye, they are not able to stand before Gods power and greatnesse: the word which he useth there, strictly ta­ken, [...] signifies to expire or give up the ghost, yet we translate it, all flesh shall perish together; that is, they shall all give up the ghost and dye, if God should appear in his power and greatnesse.

Thirdly, by perishing we may understand outward afflictions and troubles falling upon, either godly or wicked: these are called a perishing (Josh. 23. 13.) Joshua tels the people, If you will not obey and walk according to the Commandements of God, ye shall quickly perish from off this good Land; that is, ye shall be removed by out­ward afflictions from your Land, you shall goe into captivity And so, if I perish, I perish, saith Esther, Chap. 4. 17. that is, if I bring [Page 36] trouble and affliction upon my selfe, let it be so, I will venture it; A Syrian ready to perish was my father, Deut. 26. It is meant of Jacob a man much verst in trouble, as he himselfe acknowledgeth, Few and evill have been the dayes of my pilgrimage.

Fourthly, to perish, notes eternall misery; as it is put for the mi­series of this life, so for the life of misery, for that life which is an everlasting death. John 3. 16. God so loved the world, that he gave Omnimodam rei perditionem significat, o [...]p [...] ni [...]u [...] enim generationi. his onely begotten Sonne, that whosoever believeth in him, should not perish, but have everlasting life: perishing is opposed to everlasting life, and therefore implyes everlasting death.

Fifthly, to perish, notes utter desolation, and totall ruine. A cut­ting off, or a destroying the very name and remembrance of a per­son, or of a people. He that speaks lyes shall perish, Pro. 19. 9. that is, he shall be utterly destroyed. In this sense the word is used for the Devill, because he is a destroyer to the utmost, as Christ is a Savi­our to the utmost. He is called Abaddon from Abad (the word here used) Rev. 9. 12. and Apollyon, his businesse is to destroy to­tally and eternally. Thus also Antichrist, The first-borne of the De­vill (2 Thess. 2. 3.) is called the sonne of perdition: take it active­ly, he is a destroying sonne, one that destroyeth bodies and soules, as in Scripture a bloody man is called Ish dammim, a man of blood; and passively, he is a sonne of perdition; that is, a man to be de­stroyed both body and soule.

These two latter senses, namely, eternall destruction in Hell and utter destruction in this life, are joyned together. Prov. 15. 11. Hell and destruction (or Hell and perishing) are before the Lord: and Chap. 27. 20. we have the same words againe, Hell and perdition or Hell and destruction are never full. So that to perish (in a strict sense) notes even in this life an utter extirpation; so some render [...] Abscondit, ne amplius audi­tur vel videa­tur, per metony­miam sublatu [...], doletus succisus. Sublata enim è medio non ap­parent amplius sed abscondun­tu [...]. [...] it here, Who ever saw the righteous plucked up by the roots, so as there should be no remembrance, no remainder of them. The o­ther word which is joyned in the Text, cut off, carries the same sense; though it signifies properly to hide a thing, yet it is so to hide it as it appeareth no more, or so to hide it, that it can neither be heard of, nor seen any more. Hence by a Metonymie it signifies to take away or to cut off, because things that are taken away and cut off, are as things hidden and seen no more. Here then is the height of the sense, either to take it, for perishing in Hell, or for such a peri­shing in this life, as is joyned with totall desolation and desertion.

Then for the termes, innocent and righteous. The word we [Page 37] translate innocent, signifieth empty. And it is therefore applyed to an innocent person, because innocent persons are emptied of ma­lice and wickednesse, their hearts are swept and cleansed, purged and washed; there is in some sense a vacuum, a holy vacuum in the hearts of holy persons: they are freed from that fulnesse of evill which lyes in their hearts by nature, that filth is cast out. Every mans heart by nature is brim full, top full of wickednesse, as the Apostle describes the Gentiles, Rom. 1. 29. being filled with all un­righteousnesse; and it is a truth of every mans heart, it is a Cage full of uncleane Birds, a stable full of filthy dung, he hath in him a throng of sinfull thoughts, a multitude of prophane ghests lodg­ing in him. Now a person converted, is emptied of these, these ghests are turned out of their lodgings, the roomes are swept and emptied, therefore an holy person is called an empty person: Emp­tied; not absolutely emptied of all sinne, but comparatively, there is abundance cast out; so that considering how full of sin he was, he may be said to be emptied of sinne, and that his malice is cast out. In the fourth of Amos, the Prophet threatens cleannesse of [...] teeth it is a suitable judgement, that uncleane hearts and lives should be punished with cleane teeth) or innocency of teeth; for it is the word of the Text. Famine is elegantly so called. Want of bread makes empty or cleane teeth.

And where were the righteous (that's the other terme) cut off? One may put the question, where were the righteous? surely Job had very good eyes, if he could finde any righteous man upon the earth, he might seem to have clearer eyes then the Lord himselfe, if he could finde any righteous; God looked downe from heaven, and he saw none righteous, no not one, Psal. 53. 3, 4. Yet here Eliphaz bids Job enquire about the righteous, where they were cut off. To clear that.

By righteous here, we are to understand not righteous persons in a strict and legall sense, but in a Gospel mollified sense: righte­ous with an allay, righteous by way of interpretation, and not in the strictnesse of the letter. And so men are called righteous, first in reference to the work of regeneration. There are none righteous in the root or originall, in their first setting and plantation in the soyle of the world; but there are righteous persons as regenerate, and transplanted into the body of Christ, as wrought and fashioned by the Spirit of Christ.

Secondly, there are none righteous, that is, none exactly, per­fectly, [Page 38] compleatly righteous, but inchoatly, and intentionally, so many are righteous and are called righteous in the language of the Scripture.

Thirdly, there are none righteous, that is, none righteous by way of merit or desert, none are so righteous as that they can challenge any thing at Gods hand, of right, the most righteous person is an unprofitable servant; he hath nothing to plead before God but free grace. Nothing to shew unto God but Christs fulnesse, and his own emptinesse, the riches of Christ, and his own poverty. Yet there are righteous in Gods acceptance, he accounteth and accepteth them for righteous, and honours them to be called righteous.

Lastly, we may answer it thus, there are none righteous in them­selves, or from themselves, none have any righteousnesse of their own making: but the Scripture shewes us those who have righte­ousnesse, and are righaeous in another and from another; we have the righteousnesse of justification in Christ, and the righteousnesse of sanctification from Christ: righteousnesse is both imputed to, and floweth into the soule by vertue of the union which is promised in the covenant of grace with Christ the righteous, with the Lord our righteousnesse. In these respects there are righteous persons, and of such we may understand this enquiry, where were ever the righteous cut off? The righteous by regeneration, the righteous by inchoation, the righteous by acception, or the righteous by imputation; where were any such righteous in all the world of whom thou canst say, they have ever perished, or have been cut off?

Having opened the sense of the single termes, we will look to the sense of the proposition, and consider wherein we may cleare the truth of it, that innocent persons doe not perish, or that the righteous are not cut off.

Take perishing or cutting off in the first sense, namely, for anni­hilation and returning to nothing; and so, neither righteous nor unrighteous, guilty nor innocent can perish; no man shall perish so, man is of an everlasting make.

Then take perishing in the second sense, as perishing is put for dying and going out of the land of the living, thus all righteous and innocent persons perish and are cut off, namely, by the sword and sithe of death: we may say all, God indeed hath made some few exceptions out of the generall rule, but the Statute is plaine, It is appointed unto all men once to dye; Enoch was translated, [Page 39] and so was Elijah, and many shall be found alive when Christ commeth to judgement, who shall not die; they shall be but chan­ged, and have a metaphoricall, not a proper death; This makes some small abatement from, but doth not crosse the generall rule, that all must die.

Take perishing in the third sense, for some temporall outward suffering in the world, either from the hand of God immediatly, or mediately from the hand of man. Thus righteous and innocent persons may perish too, that is, they may fall under fore and great afflictions: thus righteous Abel perished, and thus Jacob was a Syrian ready to perish, and thus the godly party among the Jewes, in the time of the captivity perished, thoy perished from off the Land, as it was threatned, Josh. 23.) with the rest of the wicked; of which the two baskets of figgs, one bad, and the other good, were a fa­mous type, Jer. 24. 3.

And in regard of this outward, present, temporall perishing, we finde it often, that the righteous perish, while the unrighteous flou­rish; Psal. 73. 12. Behold (saith David) these are the ungodly, that prosper in the world; and at the fourth verse, All the day long have I been plagued, and chastened every morning. As sure, or as soone as I rise, I have a whipping, and my break-fast is bread of sorrow, and the water of adversity; these prosper, and I perish: And the Prophet (Jer. 12. 1, 2.) expostulates with holy submis­sion about this flourishing estate of the wicked, and perishing estate of the godly: Wherefore doth the way of the wicked pro­sper, &c. And in the next verse, Thou hast planted them, yea they have taken roote, they grow, yea they bring forth fruit: What a gra­dation is here of the flourishing prosperity of wicked men, while the righteous seeme to wither? Thou hast planted them; but every tree that is planted, doth not take roote, but these take roote,; Every tree that taketh roote, doth not grow up to any strength, but these take roote, and they grow: there are trees that grow, yet they bring not forth fruit, but these bring forth fruit also; Yea (saith he) they bring forth fruit; these were flourishing trees in­deed, yet in the meane time, thousands of righteous persons perish­ed in and by outward troubles.

Sometime (we find on the other hand) that the wicked perish in outward troubles, while the righteous are delivered, and have Arkes provided to save them in a common deluge. God makes that difference sometime, even in this life; he pulled Lot out of So­dome, [Page 40] while Sodome perished by fire: And righteous Noah was saved in the Arke, while the world of the ungodly perished by water.

And lastly, Both the righteous and the wicked, may be wrapped up in the very same outward perishing condition, yet alwayes with a difference; though both alike perish, yet their perishing is not alike. As it is with the righteous and wicked in regard of sinne, so of sufferings: they may both commit the same sinne for the mat­ter, as it is a transgression of the Law, but a righteous man can ne­ver sinne as the wicked; he sins not, with such formalities of sin­ning, he hath not such a heart, such a temper and bent of spi­rit, as a wicked man hath in sinning: to sinne so, is utterly incon­sistent with the new nature. Thus also it is with the perishings, afflictions, and troubles which they fall into; God sometimes sends the very same affliction for the matter, as suppose poverty, want, imprisonment, captivity, and the like, upon the one, as upon the other: But are the righteous smitten, as God smites those that smite them? Surely no, in measure he debateth with them. Isa. 27. 7, 8. They sinne not against God with the same heart, or at the same rate as the wicked doe: and God never strikes them with the same heart, or at the same rate as he doth the wicked; he cannot doe it, the strength of his love to them, makes this imposition for him. Therefore, though as the Preacher resolves the case, Eccles. 9. 1. No man knoweth either love or hatred, by all that is before him: In the matter of events, love or hatred are not visible; yet in the manner of events there is much love and hatred visible: and the spirits of such as are under those events, may discerne love or hatred, when no eye can: One seeth hatred, and another seeth love, aboundance of love mixed in his cup of sorrow. God never gives his own, a cup of pure wrath to drinke; there are alwayes some ingredients of comfort and sweetnesse put into it. This is the third sense, how righteous ones may, or may not perish.

Take perishing, in the fourth sense, as perishing is an eternall destruction; and so the proposition of Eliphaz is true throughout, strictly true; That no righteous, ever perished, or were cut off; an innocent person is, in that sense, past perishing; a righteous man is past cutting off. Joh. 10. 28. I doe give unto them eternall life, and they shall never perish. Rejoyce in this, ye righteous, ye are beyond perishing, ye are past perishing, while ye live in a pe­rishing world.

Lastly, Take it in the fifth sense, and so you may have a further truth, which I conceive, is that which Eliphaz purposely aimeth at; take perishing, for outward present destruction, joyned with a totall desertion; and in that sense the proposition of Eliphaz is true also; No righteous man, no innocent man ever perished, or was so cut off with any temporall judgement: The Apostle is di­rect for it, (2 Cor. 4. 8, 9.) We are in trouble on every side, (we see trouble which way soever we turne) but we are not distressed, we are perplexed (we are in the bryars as well as ungodly men) but not in despaire, (we are in hope still, and if there be hope for us, God is for us:) We are persecuted, but not forsaken, (God is neere us, though all the world stand aloofe,) we are cast downe, but not destroyed, we shall up againe. So that while he admits of pe­rishing in the former sense, respecting outward afflictor, yet he denies it constantly in this latter sense, so as to be cut off quite from the comforts and supports of God. That observation of David, may be thus understood, (Psal. 37. 25.) I have been young, and now am old, yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, (he doth not say, in my experience I never saw the righteous afflicted, but, I ne­ver saw him left or forsaken in his afflictions) and I never saw his seed begging their bread: he puts in that, because begging of bread, especially in the Common-wealth of Israel, and in the state of the Jewes, was a note of utter dereliction; for though God had told them, that they should have the poore alwayes with them, yet he had given an expresse Law, that there should be no beggar among them; therefore, saith he, I have not seene the righteous so for­saken, that they should be forced to live by begging.

If any say, that David himselfe begged, he asked bread of A­bimelech Casus transito­rii non reddunt mendicum. and of Nabal. I answer. It is a good rule, and it resolves the case; Transitory cases, and suddaine accidents, make no beg­gars: we must not say, David was a beggar, or begged his bread, because once he was in a straite, and asked bread of Abimelech; and in a second straite, sent to Nabal; In such sudden cases, the richest man in the world, may be put to aske a peece of bread. A good man may fall into such wants, but good men are rarely, if ever or at all left in them.

Now to apply it particularly to the intent of Eliphaz in this place. We have given three interpretations, in which we have shewed, how righteous men may perish; and two, wherein the righteous cannot possibly perish; in both which, the words here [Page 42] spoken by Eliphaz, are a truth. And concerning the fifth and last, I conceive, Eliphaz is particularly ro be understood: For he speakes not here of the eternal estate of Job (though that be involved) when he concludeth him a wicked man; but he speakes of the dealings of God in temporals: He look't upon Job as a lost man, a man ut­terly forsaken of his God; as a man of a forlorne hope, cut downe, and pluckt up, root and branch; when he saw his stocke consu­med, his children slaine, his body diseased, and his spirit so di­stempered. And so the minor, or the assumption onely is false, the proposition true; Righteous men doe not perish thus, innocent persons are not thus cut off; but thou Job perishest and art cut off: Hold there, that's false; Job in the sense Eliphaz intended, peri­shed not, was not cut off; for in the sequell, God gave him both comfort and deliverance: Love was mingled with the affliction, strength was ministred to beare the affliction: and at last a graci­ous way was made out of the affliction. The blessing of God, cau­sed him to spring out againe: though his goodly branches were broken, and his fruit pluckt off, yet his roots were not pluckt up.

It will not be unnecessary, for the clearing of this Scripture, to subjoyne a reason, why in the Old Testament, or under the old Co­venant, there was so much stumbling at the afflictions and troubles of the righteous; for it put even a David, a Jeremiah, and a Haba­kuk Psal. 73. Jer. 12. 1. hard to it, for an answer, when they saw such under sufferings; the reason was this, because God in those times, made more spe­ciall temporall promises to his people, in case of obedience, than he hath done in the time of the Gospel. Reade Deut. 28. Levit. 27. and other places, where you shall finde, how all the promises runne upon things, that concerne the outward man; they shall be blessed in their basket and in their store, they shall have this and that, and all outward things aboundantly; and the curse threatned, was the losse and deprivation of those outward blessings in case of disobe­dience: For God did winne and carry them on, in that non-age of the Church, by outward and temporall promises; hence they were much troubled and offended, when they saw righteous men under heavy pressures and breaking afflictions. Now since the comming of Christ in the flesh, and the pouring out of those speciall spirituall blessings upon his people, by the Holy Ghost, he doth not feed us so much with these outward hopes, or enjoyments. Therefore in the Gospell, we read what hard meate he giveth his people: fore­telling them plainly, If any will follow me, let him deny himselfe, [Page 43] and take up his crosse: There is scarce such a word in all the old Testament as that: he which will follow me, shall finde a crosse, and be sure of persecution; They were but children, such words and sights might terrifie them; therefore they were (as it were) dandled on the knee, and allured by sensible comforts, a land flowing with milke and honey, if they did obey; and they heard of rods and stripes in case of stubbornnesse and disobedience; Say to the righteous, it shall be well with him, for they shall eate the fruite of their doings: Woe to the wicked, it shall be ill with him, &c. Isa. 3. 10, 11. David saith (indeed) many are the troubles of the righteous, but (it is not put among the termes of their state or service) It is not said, if ye will be righteous, ye shall have trouble. Moses never told them, If any will be my disciple, let him taka up his crosse, &c. So then, Gods dealings and dispensations being most in outward things at that time, they were very apt to stumble at the crosse. And there is greater reason why they should stumble at a mole­hill, then we at a mountaine of trouble: God having told us, that seeing he hath given us such excellent things in Christ, such glo­rious mercies, and transcendent priviledges in the Gospel, we may well take afflictions and troubles into the bargaine, and never shrinke or straine at them, but rather take them well. So much for that verse, The righteous are not cut off, neither doe innocent persons perish.

Eliphaz having given Job his turne to search his experiences, brings forth his own, in the next words: Even as I have seene, Vers. 8. they that plow iniquity, and sow wickednesse, reape the same; As if he should say, Job, I know you are not able to give me one instance of a righteous mans perishing, but I could give you many and ma­ny instances, I could write whole books concerning wicked men pe­rishing, and of the ungodly cut off; This he carries under a meta­phor, and by continued metaphors, makes up an elegant allegorie, in those termes of plowing, sowing, reaping.

Even as I have seene.] That word notes, a curious observa­tion; [...] Significat non simpliciter vi­dere, sed curiese inspicere. not a light transitory glance of the eye, but a criticall con­sideration of any thing. As it is said, Gen. 1. 4. God saw the light that he had made, God saw it discerningly, for he found it was very good: And so it is said, Gen. 34. 1, 2. that Dinah went forth to see the daughters of the land, that is, curiously (though vaine­ly) to observe the manners and fashions of the people; and in the fame verse, Hamor the sonne of Sechem saw her, he saw her so [Page 44] exactly, as to be taken with her beauty, his eye entangled his heart, and both entangled his life. So here, Even as I have seene, that is, by a diligent inspection, and judicious consideration of what I saw. And what was that? Mysticall Husbandry.

They that plow iniquity and sow wickednesse, reape the same.

They that plow iniquity.] The word which we translate to [...] F [...]dit fundam, [...]ravit. Pe [...] me­taphoram fo­dit cogitatione, vel intentus fuit rei ali [...]ui conficiendae sicut arator praeparat ter­ram ante semi­na [...]orem▪ plow, signifies the use of any kinde of art or manufacture; as the worke of a Smith, or of a Carpenter, in Iron, wood or timber; And as the art, so the Artist or handicrafts-man (Isa. 44. 12.) is exprest by this word: The Smith with his tongs, worketh in the coales. And Zech. 1. 20. It is put for a Carpenter, The Lord shew­ed me foure Carpenters: Now here it is applyed to the Plow­man, and to his plowing. So Hose. 10. 13. Ye have plowed wick­ednesse, ye have reaped iniquity, ye have eaten the fruit of lies▪

And this plowing of iniquity, or plowing of wickednesse, takes in both the outward act of sinne (to plow iniquity, is to com­mit and practise iniquity) and the inward act of sinne, to plow iniquity, is as much as to devise and meditate iniquity. Prov. 3. 29. Devise not (Heb. plow not) evill against thy neighbour. So Prov. 6. 18. A heart that deviseth, or ploweth, wicked ima­ginations. And Prov. 21. 4. The plowing of the wicked is sinne; That is, whatsoever they devise, or whatsoever they doe, inside and outside, the cloath and linings of their garments are all sinne.

Likewise this word denotes, not onely speculative evils, but also secrecie of practice; or a plot carried and acted secretly. Thus (2 Sam. 23. 9.) it is said, David knew that Saul secretly pra­ctised evill against him; The Hebrew is, he knew that Saul plow­ed evill against him. So that it may be taken, either for the me­ditating of evill, or for a politick close way of effecting any evill or wicked designe.

And the Scripture elegantly calls the musing or meditating of sinne, plowing, because a man in meditation, (when he would ac­complish any wickednesse) turnes up (as it were) all the corrup­tions that are in his heart, and all the conveniencies that are in the world, to attaine his end. As a man that meditates upon any holy thing, upon Christ, or Free-grace, &c. turnes up all the graces and abilities, that are in his spirit, he plowes up his heart, that he may fetch up the strength, and enjoy the sweetnesse of them.

So then this ploughing noteth two things chiefly; First, the pains and labour which wicked men take in sinfull courses, every one that sinnes doth not plough sinne, or is not a worker (which is an equivalent phrase) of iniquity. Secondly, it implyes the black Art and hellish skill of wicked men in sinning. To plough is a skill, & so is some kinde of sinning (though to sin in generall, be as naturall as to see, and needs as little teaching as the eare to heare (some men ( [...]s we may say) are bunglers in sinning, others are their crafts-masters at this plough, and can lay a furrow of iniquity so strait, do an act of filthinesse so cleanly, that you can hardly see any thing amisse in it; Those words in the New Testament, To commit sinne, to worke ini­quity, an abomination, or a lye, Rev. 21. 27. &c. are answerable to this in the Old Testament, a plougher of iniquity.

And some translate this Text so; the vulgar reades it thus, They Qui operantur iniquitatem. who worke iniquity; all which expressions set forth and elegantly describe such, who sinne resolvedly, industriously, cunningly, curi­ously, such as have the art (and will spare no pains) to do wickedly. These have served an apprentiship to their lusts, and are now as Freemen of Hell, yet still Satans Drudges, and active Engineers to plot and execute what God abhorres.

Note this further, that ploughing in Scripture referres both to good actions and to bad; there is a plowing for good, the Meta­phor is so applyed, Prov. 4. 27. Doe not they erre that devise evill? (that plough evill) but mercy and truth shall be to them that de­vise good, (to them that plough good) the same word is used in both; and it intimates (as before) both the paines and the skill which a godly man bestowes and shewes about holy things: the great work of repentance is often allegorized by ploughing, Breake up the follow ground: and our obedience to the Gospell, whether in the profession or preaching of it, is called ploughing, Luk. 9. 62. He that putteth his hand to the plough and lookes backe, is not fit for the kingdome of God. Grace is as active and as accurate as Lust can be.

It followes, And sow wickednesse, reape the same. Eliphaz goes on with the Metaphor, after plowing comes sowing, and after seed time, reaping time or harvest. Sowing in Scripture is divers wayes applyed unto the actions of men.

First, there is a sowing which is the work of charity, when we dispense and drstribute to the helpe of the poore, especially to the Saints; so 2 Cor. 9. 6. He that soweth sparingly; that is, he that giveth unto the poore sparingly.

Secondly, sowing is applyed to the preaching of the Gospel, to the scattering of the Word in at the eares, and into the hearts of men, Luke 8. 5. A sower went out to sow.

Thirdly, sowing is applyed unto the buriall of the dead, 1 Cor. 15. 42. that which is sowne in weaknesse, the bodies of men are as seed in the earth, they shall spring up againe.

Fourthly, sowing is applyed to repenting teares, they that sow Psal. 126. 5. in teares; that is, they that goe on repenting and mourning, shall reape in joy; they shall have sheaves of comfort.

And fifthly, it is applyed generally unto any action good or bad, Gal. 6. 8. He that soweth to the flesh, shall of the flesh reape cor­ruption, and he that soweth to the spirit, &c. Sowing (as plough­ing) is used in regard of doing good and evill, sow to your selves in righteousnesse, saith the Prophet; and here on the other side, They that plough iniquity and sow wickednesse. Here is the progresse of sinne: sinne goeth on gradually, there is not onely a ploughing but a sowing; sinne is the seed, and there is a seminall vertue in every sin, it will spring up againe and bring forth an hundred fold more in misery, to the whole man, flesh and spirit, then ever it gave in delights unto the flesh.

The word which we translate [wickednesse] signifies wearinesse, [...] Seminant dolo res. Vulg. labour, perversenesse; because wicked persons weary and toile themselves in serving and satisfying their lusts. Numb. 23. 21. I have seen no perversenesse in Israel. God did not finde them la­boriously and industriously wicked at that time. To do wickedly is a wearisome imployment, a hard labour. The vulgar Latine ren­ders it by sorrow; and sow sorrowes.

Reape the same.] The Apostle 1 Cor. 15. 37. telleth us, That the Husbandman soweth not the same body, that shall be, how then is it said, they sow wickednesse and reape the same? when they come to the harvest, what shall they have? The same saith Eliphaz. It is true, A man that soweth, doth not reape the same, individually, or numerically; that is, the very same particular seed; but he reaps the same specifically, the same in kinde; that's the meaning here, their crop or harvest shall be like their seed time, Gal. 6. 7 What­soever a man soweth, that shall he also reape, the same in kinde, not the same in number. Prov. 22. 8. He that soweth iniquity shall reape vanity. It is not the sinne it selfe, which is reaped, but the fruit, the product of that sinne; that, they shall reape; the punishment of sin is the fruit of sin, and it is called the same: Punishment is a [Page 47] visible sinne. Thy way and thy doings have procured these things un­to thee, this is thy wickednesse, Jer. 4. 18. The bitter things procured by wickednesse, are called wickednesse. As the sweet fruits of our good workes, are called our works. Rev. 14. 14. Blessed are the dead that dye in the Lord, for they rest from their labours, and their workes follow them: their workes follow them, how? Not their workes in kinde, the very same individuall workes, which they have done here follow them not (for they are transient acts and have no subsistency) but the fruits of those workes, and the blessings, which lie in the promise for such as doe those workes, these fruits, these blessings follow them: the blessings annexed to faith, obedi­ence, and holinesse, these follow them. So now, when it is said of a wicked man, what he ploweth and soweth, he reapeth the same, it is to be understood of the same thing in the issue and conse­quents of it, those curses, those treasures, that harvest of wrath, which lie in the threatnings against him, these are rained downe upon him▪ and are made the portion of his cup.

Againe [the same] that is, the same in degree; if he have sowne much, he shall reape much, if he have sowne but little, he shall reape but little, he shall have his due proportion. The justice of God doth neither commute nor compound penalties with wicked men: as it will not wrong or overcharge, so neither will it favour or spare them in their sinnes. God spared not his Sonne, when he was in the place of sinners, Rom. 8. 32. much lesse will he spare any sin­ner, who is not in his Sonne. So much for the opening of these words. We shall now observe some things from them.

Even as I have seen, they that plough iniquity. Hence we learne, first, That to be a wicked man is no easie taske; he must goe to plough for it: It is plowing, and you know plowing is laborious, Beli [...]l, de luci potest à [...] q. e Non & [...] q. e. lu­gam, ut signi­ficatur impati­en [...]ia Jug [...]. Hie [...]on. yea it is hard labour. Wicked men in Scripture are called Sonnes of Belial, that is, such as will not endure the yoke; they will not en­dure Gods yoke, or the yoke of Christ, though it be an easie yoke: but they are content slavishly to yeeld their (otherwise) proud and delicate necks to Satans yoke, to tugge and sweat at his plough all their dayes. There is a promise in the Prophet of a time, when Swords shall be turned into plough-shares, and speares into pruning­hooks; that is, men shall leave fighting and goe to working, they shall have peace: and it is but too too discernable, that many would break their swords, into these mysticall plough-shares, and their spears into sinning-hooks; they would have peace, why? that they [Page 48] might leave fighting and goe to sinning, that they might worke wickednesse more quietly, and keep close to their trade, the plow­ing of iniquity without disturbance.

Secondly observe, That there is an art in wickednesse; it is Plowing, or as the word imports an artificiall working. Some are curious and exact in shaping, polishing, and setting off their sin: so the Holy Ghost intimates, Rev. 21. 27. Whosoever worketh abomi­nation [...] and maketh a lye; there is but one Verbe in the Greek, and so we may reade it fully enough in our language, Whosoever work­eth abomination and a lye; to worke an abomination or a lye, is more then to doe an abomination or tell a lye. As when we say such a man is a Clockmaker, it notes art, as well as action. So to say such a man is an Abomination-worker, or a Lye-maker, notes him not only industrious, but crafty, or (as the Prophet speaks) wise to doe evill.

Thirdly, note from these metaphors of plowing and sowing, That wicked men expect benefit in wayes of sinne, and look to be gainers, by being evill doers. They make iniquity their plough; and a mans plough is so much his profit, that it is growne into a Proverbe, to call that (whatsoever it is) by which a man makes his living or his profit, His plough. And when we say, there are many candles burning and never a plough going. It is to tax un­thriftinesse or carelesse spending, without honest care of getting. Every man tils in expectation of a crop; who would put his plough into the ground to receive nothing? The Apostle argues from this as a dictate of nature, (Cor. 9. 10.) He that ploweth, ploweth in hope. And James 5. 7. The husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, having bestowed his labour, he doth not count it labour lost. It is even so with wicked men, when they are sin­ning, they think themselves thriving, or laying up that in the earth a while which will grow and increase to a plentifull harvest. What strange fancies have many to be rich, to be great, by wayes of wic­kednesse. Thus they plow in hope, but they shall never be partakers of their hope: yea, they shall be ashamed of their hope, their sin will deceive them. And that which will make their poverty most bur­thensome, is their hope of riches, the expectation they had to gain, will make their losse, their breaking, and their undoing intolle­rable.

Fourthly, observe from these Metaphors, That every sinfull act persisted in, shall have a certaine sorrowfull reward, it shall assu­redly [Page 49] be answered with judgement, tribulation, and anguish. Assu­redly it shall. Are not plowing and seed-time an assurance of the harvest? They that goe forth vainly rejocing, bearing that poy­sonous seed, shall doubtlesse come againe, and bring their sheaves of sorrow with them. That which God promised (Gen. 8. 22.) in regard of naturall husbandry, he hath threatned in regard of this mysticall husbandry: after the flood he promised, that while the Earth remained, Summer and Winter, Seed-time and Harvest should not cease. So it is here, onely with this difference, the Lord useth all means to disswade and prevent the seed-time of sinne. But when notwithstanding all those threatnings, men will be sow­ing iniquity, he hath made an everlasting Decree (as firme in its kinde, as that about the waters of Noah) that Harvest shall fol­low, and every such soule shall both reape and eat, the fruit of his plowings and sowings.

Fifthly, observe, That the punishment of sinne may come long af­ter the committing of sinne; the one is the seed-time, and the other a reaping-time; there is a great distance of time between sowing and reaping. The seeds of sin may lie many yeares under the fur­rowes. A man may commit a sinne in his youth, and not finde the harvest of it, till his old age. How many (as Job complains, but in a worse sense then he) in their old age, are made to possesse the sins of their youth, and feele that which they have forgot. The Hus­bandman (in that place before mentioned, James 5. 7.) waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it: and through the long patience of God, some wicked men (though they thought their sins not sowed, but buried for ever, and never desire to see or heare of them, yet) in a sense some wicked men (I say) wait long for the noxious fruit of their owne hearts.

Sometimes indeed the seed-time and harvest of sin, are found in the same houre: and while a man hath scarce ended his sin, his pu­nishment begins. The Prophet describing the plenty and prosperi­ty of the Church in the latter dayes, tels us, That the ploughman Amos 9. 13. shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes, him that soweth the seed. The returnes of sinne are to some as quick and plentifull, judgement rides post after them, the reaper overtakes the sower, or the man reapes, as soon as he hath sowed: wrath arrests him in the very act of sinning. And we may say as Elisha in another case, is 2 King. 6. 32. not the sound of his Masters feet behinde him? The sound of pu­nishment is at the very heels of sin. That black Oxe comes as swift [Page 50] as a Leopard, treading upon his heeles: And though sometimes it comes slowly as an Oxe, yet alwayes it treads hardest, when it comes slowest. A wicked man may commit evill an hundred times, Eccles. 8. and his dayes (of peace) be prolonged, for his harvest of wrath (like Habbakuks vision of mercy) is for an appointed time, but in the end it will not lye, (though he would tarry for it) it will not tar­ry. The naturall harvest belies (sc. failes) some mens hopes, but Spem menitia seges. this mysticall harvest, shall not bely his feares (if he have any,) it shall bely his presumption, how much soever he hath.

Sixthly, observe, That the punishment of sinne shall be proportio­nable to the degrees of sinne. He shall reape, the same, saith the Text, the same in degree. So the Scripture speakes, and so experience teacheth concerning naturall sowing; a mans harvest is gradually such, as is his seed-time, if he have sowne much (in an ordinary course) he shall reape much; The Apostle alludes to this, where he speakes of the seed of charity, If ye sow sparingly, ye shall reape 2 Cor. 9. 6. sparingly; on the other side, if ye sow plentifully, ye shall reape plentifully. Sometimes through the judgement of God, (which can easily breake through the principles of nature) it commeth to passe▪ as it is, Hag. 1. 6. Ye sow much, and reape little; God makes the harvest thinne and leane, when the seed-time was thick and plentifull; but in regard of sinning (I speake of such as goe on impenitently in their sinnes, and have not Christ to take off their sinne from them) such persons as sowe much, shall be sure to reape much; They shall be beaten with many stripes, who impenitently multiply their transgressions.

Seventhly, observe, Punishment shall not exceed the desert of sinne. They reape the same; The same, equall in degree or quan­tity, not beyond the degree of sinning. In nature, the corne [...]eap't, is more then the corne sowne; sometimes a hundred fold, some­times sixty, sometimes thirty; as Christ speakes, in the Parable of the Sower, Math. 13. But the punishment of sinne reaped, is not a graine more then the sin committed. All the punishments of this life, are lesse then sin, as Ezra confesses, After all that is come upon us for our evill deeds, and for our great trespasse, see­ing that thou our God hast punished us lesse then our iniquity, &c. Chap. 9. 13. And in the life to come, the damned shall not be punished more then sin deserveth; yea I may say (with reverence to his Almighty power) God cannot punish a sin, beyond that proportion which it deserveth; and the reason is this, Infinite [Page 51] power, cannot inflict a punishment, beyond that which infinite Justice doth require; Infinite Justice is offended, and must be satisfied (if not satisfied by Christ) then by the person himselfe offend­ing: therefore infinite power, cannot lay upon a man, more then his sin doth deserve, though it may easily lay more upon him then his nature can endure. So then, all that wicked men beare in this life, is lesse, and all they shall beare in hell, will not be more, then the deserts of sin, or the demands of Justice.

An objection may seeme to lye against this, from that award of judgement against Babylon: Double to her double, according to her works, it may seeme that her harvest of punishment must exceed in Rev. 18. 6. double proportion, her seed time of sinning; The Psalmist speakes yet higher, Render unto our neighbours sevenfold into their bosome, their reproach, wherewith they have reproached thee O Lord. Render Psal. 79. 12. sevenfold, that is, manifold: That number in Scripture, multiplies the sense into any number; To render sevenfold, may be rendred the greatest number.

I answer, Babylons punishment shall be double, respecting what Babylon shall have acted, but not double, respecting what Baby­lon shall have deserved; Give to her double; if it be possible, let her have as much blood more to drinke, as she hath spilt, for she deserveth to drinke an hundred times more. The blood of Saints, is precious blood; one drop of the blood of Sion, is more worth than a whole ocean of the blood of Babylon, therefore give her double; though it be more in quantity, it is not so much in va­lue. And so, reward our neighbours that have reproached thee sevenfold, it is not sevenfold beyond their deserts; for one scorne that a wicked man powreth upon a childe of God (and so upon God, for that's the meaning of the Psalme) cannot be recom­pensed with ten thousand reproaches, powred upon wicked men: Reproach is the due of ungodly men here, and everlasting re­proach, shall be their portion hereafter. But the least reproach cast upon God, is an infinite wrong; and the reproach of his peo­ple is so much his, that he reckons it as his own: And will therefore take away all reproach from his people, and render to their un­kinde neighbours, their reproach sevenfold (and that's but equall) into their bosomes.

Lastly, When it is said, They shall reape the same: We are taught, That the punishment of sinne, shall be like the sinne in kinde; It shall be the same, not only in degree, but also in likenesse. Punish­ment [Page 62] often beares the image and superscription of sin upon it. You may see the fathers face and feature in the childe. Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reape, saith the Apostle, Gal. 6. 7. If a man sowe wheate, he shall reape wheate; the harvest tells you what kinde of graine was sowed in every feild: if a man sowes wheate he, shall not reape tares, and if a man sowe tares, he shall not reape wheate. Thus God often returnes the sin of man upon him; sin comes to him in its own likenesse, and he may reade the name of it, stampt upon the affliction; or by the judgement inflicted, interpret the wickednesse committed; This was openly confess'd by Adonibezek, (Judg. 1. 7.) As I have done, so God hath re­quited me, just so; and what was that? He speakes out in the for­mer words: Threescore and ten Kings, having their thumbes and their great tooes cut off, gathered their meate under my Table; there was his sowing, his reaping was the same, They caught him (saith the Text) and cut off his thumbes, and his great toes. The very first Law that was formally made and published after the fall, was a Law of retaliation, or of counterpassion, Gen. 6. 9. Whosoever sheddeth mans blood, (what shall he reape?) by man shall his blood be shed; he must reape the same: The Judicials of Moses are plaine for this, Exod. 21. 24. Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth, &c. They have moved me to jealousie, saith the Lord, by that Deut. 32. 21. which is not God, and I will move them to jealousie, by those who are not a people. Like as ye have forsaken me, and served strange Gods in your Land, so shall ye serve strangers in a Land which is not yours, Jer. 5. 19. God payeth them in their owne coine. Who so stoppeth his eares at the cry of the poore, he also shall cry him­selfe, but shall not be heard, Prov. 21. 13. And so concerning the preaching of the word, contemned, (Zech. 7. 13.) Therefore it is come to passe, that as he cryed, and they would not heare, so they cryed, and I would not heare, saith the Lord of Hosts: They reape as they sowed, they would not heare, that was their sin; they shall not be heard, that's the punishment; they shall see how good it is, to be wilfully deafe, when God commands, by his being judi­cially deafe, when they complaine. The Sodomites, had a fire of unnaturall lust among them, and God sent a showre of fire unna­ture) to destroy them. The Egyptians killed the Israelitish chil­dren, that was the seed they sowed, they reape the same; God slew their children, even all their first-borne in one night. Nadab [Page 53] and Abihu, offered strange fire, there was their wickednesse, they reaped the same, God by fire from Heaven, in a strange manner, slew them in a moment.

Yea, we find the Lord sometimes dealing thus with his own deare servants, he will cause them to reape that, which they have sowen, in kind; David had defiled his neighbours wife, there­fore, saith the Lord, I will take thy wives from before thine eyes, 2 Sam. 12. 11. and give them to thy neighbour, and he shall lye with thy wives, in the sight of this Sunne. Againe, The Lord tells him, Thou hast slaine Ʋriah with the sword of the children of Ammon, there­fore the sword shall never depart from thine house. You see, here was sword for sword, and defilement for defilement; even holy David reaped the same, which he had sowed. It is very re­markeable, which is reported in the history of the Church, by So­crates, concerning Valens the Emperour, who was a great perse­cuter Socrat Histor. Eccl. l. 4. c. 3. of the orthodox Christians, and a maintainer of Arianisme; The story tells us, that in his warres against the Gothes, he was overthrowne, and hiding himselfe in a little cottage, the enemy came by, burnt it, and him together; Now see, how God in this, gave him to reape, what he had sowen: for when fourscore of the orthodox sayled from Constantinople to Nicomedia, to treate with him, about the points of Arrianisme, and to settle the matter by way of dispute; the Emperour hearing of their approach, while they were in the haven, and before they could come on shore, caused the Ships to be fired wherein they were, and so consumed them all; here was burntng for burning. And it is observed (in the French Historie) that Charles the ninth of France, who was the Anno 15 72. contriver of that great Massachre in Paris, wherein so many thou­sand Protestants were forced through a Red sea, a sea of blood, to their rest in Canaan: this bloody King, at last dyed himselfe, by a strange eruption of blood from all the passages of his body; thus he also reaped what he had sowne, he had powred out blood, and his blood was powred out. It were easie to give you plenty of instances, bearing witnesse of this accurate justice of God. Exam­ples were frequent in Jobs time, you see Eliphaz had store of these in his note-booke, Even as I have seene, they that plow iniquity and sow wickednesse, reape the same.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 9, 10, 11.

By the blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his no­strils are they consumed.

The roaring of the Lion, and the voice of the fierce Lion, and the teeth of the young Lions are broken.

The old Lion perisheth for lack of prey, and the stout Lions whelps are scattered abroad.

ELiphaz having given an account of his observation, in generall, that he had often seene wicked men perish, ver. 8. In these three verses, he illustrates his observation, by an elegant descripti­on of the manner how, or the power by which wicked men perish and are cut off; namely, by the blast of God, ver. 9. By the blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his nostrils are they consumed; and least any should think, that this blast of God carries away one­ly strawes and feathers, light and weake persons into perdition; he adds the weightiest and the strongest; The roaring of the Lion, the teeth of the young Lions are broken: God by his blast can take away or breake, the strongest, the mightiest; Lion-like men, men fierce like Lions, and stout like the Lions whelpe. Under the sha­dow of which allusions, he closely strikes at Job, who was once a great man, the greatest of all the men in the East; a fierce spoiling Lion (in the apprehension of his friends) and yet God brought him downe. This in briefe, is the illustration of the argument, in these three verses, By the blast of God they perish, &c.

Eliphaz (having in the former verse, by the metaphor of plow­ing, sowing, and reaping, set forth the actings and expectations, the issues and successes of wicked men) here (as some conceive) continues the metaphor or the Allegory by this expression of bla­hing, which (we know) is often used in reference to the seed sowne; As if Eliphaz had said, when these men have plowed and sowed, when they are in expectation of a fruitfully and plentifull harvest, then God blasteth the seed and the seeds-man too; he sen­deth forth his rough winde, which drieth up and withereth stalke and eare, the counsell and the counsellours: And though blasting spoile or prevent reaping in an ordinary sense, yet blasting may be reaping (as here) in a figurative sense: They who sow iniquity, are often punished by reaping disappointments, which is the bla­sting [Page 55] of their hopes, and the consumption of their confidences.

Blasting of corne and fruits, is often spoken of in the old Te­stament (as 1 King. 8. 37.) If there be in the Land blasting and mildew. Amos 4. 9 I have smitten you with blasting and mil­dew: And a people spoiled by the sword, and consumed by warre, are compared, to corne blasted before it be growne up, Isa. 37. 27. [...] Herba percussa uredine est percussio se­mentis vento orientali ingre­diente spicas. Adeo ut non perficiant ma­ [...]u [...]ita [...]em su­am, Rab Da­vid. in lib. rad. from [...] But the word in the Originall, for blasting corne, is different from this in the Text: The roote of that, signifies to dry up or cause to wither: This to breathe, as a man breathes with his nostrils: By the breath of his nostrils, or (as we translate) by the blast of his no­strils; So in the description of mans creation, Gen. 2. 7. Moses saith, God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, or, the blast of life.

This blasting, or blast of God, is sometime put for a storme or mighty tempest, suddenly raised up, by the power of God. Thus (Exod. 15. 8.) Moses relating the sudden destruction of the Egyp­tians in the Red-sea, saith, With the blast of thy nostrils, the waters were gathered together, the sloods stood upright as an heap, &c. That is, with the wind, which God sent out, as his instrument, he gathe­red Anhelavit. the waters to swallow up the Egyptians, and save his own peo­ple. And we find the word, (Isa. 25. 4.) used to denote the fu­rious blasting violence of wicked men, in the day of their rage and madnesse against the Church. When the blast of the terrible ones is as a storme against the wall, thou shalt bring downe the noise of stran­gers, as the heat in a dry place, &c.

By the blast of God.] God in this act of vengance against the plowers of wickednesse, is presented to us in his Name, Eloah; which signifies, the mighty or puissant God; So Mr Broughton translates it, By the breath of the puissant they perish. The strong God, or God in his strength, comes armed against strong trans­gressors. The effect shewes the strength of this blast, For

By his blast they perish, saith the Text, it is the word used be­fore, they are not onely a little wither'd or scorched, but they are utterly consumed, they are destroyed, roote and branch, head and taile as in one day.

The next words in the Text, by the breath of his nostrils they are [...] consumed, are but the repeating of the same thing; yet there is a considerable difference in the expressions. By the breath of his nostrils.] The word (Ruach) which we there translate breath, signifies generally, spirit, ghost, breath or wind; sometime the [Page 56] Holy Ghost, who is breathed from the Father and Sonne; The breath of God put alone, notes the wrath of God, Isa. 30. 33. To­phet is prepared of old, &c. The breath of the Lord, (sc. the wrath of the Lord) like a streame of brimstone, doth kindle it. This phrase also, The breath of Gods nostrils, signifies the anger and wrath of God. And the anger of God, is called the breath of his Animalia com­mota spirant vehementiùs, & narium fla­tu iram indi­cant. nostrils, after the manner of men and other creatures; because anger breathes out at their nostrils: The naturalists observe that anger inflaming the spirits, and heating the heart, frequent brea­thing followes (as it were) to coole the fire, and to ease that in­flamation; an angry man breathes quick and short: When Saul was enraged and mad with malice against the Saints, he is said, To breath out threatnings and slaughter, Act. 9. 1. therefore also, anger is called, the breath of Gods nostrils.

Further, it is considerable, that the word nostrill, is put alone, for the wrath of God: Psal. 95. 11. He sware in his nostrill, that In naso enim i [...]ra apparet▪ ex vehementiore spiratione, & potissimum ex remissione aut dila [...]atione na­rium ira con­spicitur. is (as we translate it) he sware in his wrath, that they should not enter into his rest. Likewise Psal. 2. 12. If his wrath be kindled but a little; the Hebrew is, if his nose or nostrill be kindled but a little; the nostrill, being an organ of the body, in which wrath shewes it selfe, is put for wrath it selfe. Palenesse and snuffing of the nose, are symptomes of anger. In our broverbials, to take a thing in snuffe, is to take it in anger. Againe, in Scripture we finde, that slownesse to anger, and hastinesse to be angry, are exprest by the different frame of the nostrils; as namely, when the Lord is said to be slow to anger, the Hebrew is long of nostrils: (Psal. [...] 103. 8.) The Lord is slow to anger, or, (Exod. 34. 6.) Long-suf­fering. In both places, the Originall is, long of nostrils, that is, of anger, or long ere he be angry. On the other side, a passionate, cholerick man, a man ready to conceive anger, is said to have a straite or a short nostrill; He that is soone angry, dealeth foolishly, Prov. 14. 17. The Hebrew is, he that hath a short or a narrow no­strill, [...] Brevis narium. i. e. praeceps ad iram. [...]. Sept. Spiritu furoris ejus deficiunt. dealeth foolishly, because such men are most apt to conceive anger; So then, while Eliphaz saith, by the breath of his nostrils they are consumed, it is, as if he had said, by the wrath and dis­pleasure of God they are consumed; and the Septuagint translate it, directly by anger, They are consumed by the breath, or spirit of his anger; so others in the Latine, They are consumed by the spi­rit of his fury. And both these words, breath and blast, are found together in one place, 2 Sam. 22. 16. At the blast of the breath of [Page 57] his nostrils; the whole verse runneth thus, The channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the earth were discovered, at the rebu­king of the Lord, at the blast of the breath of his nostrils, that is, at the great displeasure of the Lord.

So, we see, what we are here to understand, by the breath and by the blast of the Lord. And in this passage, Eliphaz seems to hint at the manner of the death of Jobs children, who were destroyed by the strength of a mighty winde, smiting the foure corners of the house so, that it fell upon them: that winde may well be called the breath and the blast of God, both in regard of the wonder and strangenesse of it, as also because (though Satan was the instru­ment) he had the ordering and disposing of it. Satans breath, all the winde he can raise, cannot blow away a feather, unlesse the Lord give and continue leave and strength, to doe it.

Observe first, God can easily destroy wicked men. He doth it by a blast, or by a breath. Though, to themselves and others, they ap­peare as great Mountains, yet before God they are but as dust, or chaffe of the Mountains; by a blast or by a breath he scatters and consumes them: So David compares them (Psal. 1. 4.) The un­godly are not so, (not so, how? they are not as a tree planted by the waters side, that is the portion of the righteous; how are the ungodly then?) they are as the chaffe, that the winde scattereth or driveth away, the best of them, the most solid of them are no bet­ter. And (Isa. 17. 13.) The Nations shall be chased, as the chaffe of the mountaines before the winde, and as a rolling thing before the whirl­winde. Though Nations, mighty strong powerfull Nations, come out against God, and his people, Fear them not: For if God set himselfe against them, they are no more before him, then a little chaffe, he scatters them by the breath of his displeasure.

You know it is no trouble for a man to breath, or to make a blast with his mouth; and this phrase is used, to shew with what ease and facility God destroys all the plots and counsels of wicked men; it putteth him to no paine, no sweating, no travel or labour to doe it; men are put to much expence of paines, and run many hazzards, to oppose the wickedness of men; but God doth it with a breath. (2 King. 19. 7.) When God sent to Hezekiah, to assure him that he would deliver him from Senacherib, he not onely promiseth to doe it, but shews him how he will do it, even as in this Text, Be­hold I will send a blast upon him: that's all, I will doe, I will not trouble my self much about the businesse; you must gather armies [Page 58] and make great preparations against the enemy, but I will doe it with a blast.

And which is yet more speedy. Some understand this blast to note only the will and pleasure, the intent or purpose of God, by the blast of God they perish; that is, if he doe but will it, it is done, it is no more for him to act it then intend it. The Septuagint tran­slate [...]. near this sence, by the command of God they perish; as if Eli­phaz had said, it is as easie for God to doe it, as to say it shall, or to command it to be done. Men can command great things, and talke much, what they will doe; and all proves but talking and commanding: one man may command more in an houre, then a Million can doe in a year, but with God it is all one, to command & accomplish. It is noted for a high speech, that of Caesar to Metellus, who opposing him, when he came into the Roman Treasury, to take the money there heaped together. Caesar (whose great spirit could not bear opposition) saith to him, Let me alone, or I will lay thee dead upon the ground. And presently, at once to quallifie that threat and magnifie his owne power, addes, Young man it is harder for mee to speak this, then to doe it. It is most certainly so with God, he can as easily doe any thing as speak it. Yet further, we finde the easinesse of Gods destroying his enemies set forth a degree higher, He doth it by a looke; as by a blast of his nostrils, so by a cast of his eye; that's a small trouble, and that's all, that it needs cost God to destroy the strongest, the vilest and violentest foe in the world: thus he consumed the Hoast of Pharaoh, even with a look, (Exod. 14. 24.) It came to passe that in the morning watch, the Lord looked unto the hoast of the Egyptians, through the pillar of fire, and of the cloud, and troubled the hoast of the Egyptians. If God hide his face from his people they are troubled, and if he look upon his enemies they are troubled. He darts out both beams of life, and beams of death from his eyes. When a godly man is afflicted, if he can but get the Lord to look upon his trouble, he is delivered. And when wicked men prosper, if God do but look upon their glory they are withered. With such ease doth the Scripture expresse the destructi­on of wicked ones, it is by a breath, by a word, by a command, by a look; An intimation from the eye of God, is execution.

Secondly note; God can suddenly destroy the counsels and the plottings, the ploughings and the sowings of wicked men. In pro­verbial speaking, to doe a thing suddenly, and to doe a thing with a breath, are the same: God can as soon destroy his enemies, as a man [Page 59] can breath; Psal. 73. 10. How are they brought into desolation in a moment! A blast, you know, is gone in a moment: Isaiah 42. 9. These two things shall come upon thee in a moment, losse of children and widow-hood. God can with one breath, blow away both the husband and the children. So (Jer. 4. 20.) the Church of the Jewes speaks thus, Destruction upon destruction is cryed, for the whole land is spoyled, suddenly are my tents spoyled, and my curtains in a moment: God doth but blow upon the Tents, and presently the coards break, and the stakes thereof are loosened. If man be angry, he must sit downe and consult, he must lay his plot and contrive a way of revenge; but no sooner is God angry but he can revenge; That wrath cannot want an instrument, which can make one. Infinite wisdome sees all means at once, and infi­nite power can use them at once. As the grace of God knowes not long delayes, it comes swiftly, as a sweet blast or holy breath, Nescit tarda molimina Spi­ritus sancti gratia. Grace is speedy and upon the wing; so likewise the wrath of God knows no tedious long delayes: They who doe wickedly and stand out impenitently, shall perish suddenly. And though the Lord be slow to anger before he strikes, yet when he strikes, he can do it at once, it is but a blast of his wrath, and a breath of his displeasure, and the stoutest of the sons of men are dryed like a leafe.

Thirdly note, That God destroyeth wicked men secretly and in­visibly. To destroy by a breath, is a close way of destroying. So (Hag. 1. 9.) his anger is exprest against his own people, for neg­lecting his Ordinances and Temple, Yee looked for much, but loe it came to little, and when ye brought it home, I did blow upon it, that is I sent an invisible and secret curse upon it.

Lastly, we may observe from the manner of this destruction, That the destruction of wicked men, the plowers of iniquity, is un­avoydable; it is done by a breath, now the winde bloweth where it listeth, no man can countercommand or stop the winde. The winde is swift, as well as strong, no man can out-run the strome of Gods displeasure. He that fleeth of them, shall not flee away (for it is a Amos 9. 1, 2. winde that followeth them) and he that escapeth of them, shall not be delivered, it is a blast that is gone out after them: they cannot deliver themselves by art or cunning, by wit or policy; they cannot deceive or cozen the winde: they cannot deliver themselves by power or strength, they cannot conquer or overcome this winde: It comes suddenly, invisibly, irresistibly; who can stand before God when he is angry, yea, who knoweth the power of his wrath or blast.

This Eliphaz goes on to shew, in the tenth and eleventh Verses, and therefore takes his instance, from those creatures which are mightiest, which are strongest▪ The roaring of the Lion, and the voyce of the fierce Lion, and the teeth of the young Lion are broken; the old Lion perisheth for lack of prey, and the stout Lions whelps are scattered abroad.

The expressions are very various. Here are five words in these Leonum nomina plura sun [...], & secundum ae [...]atis gr [...]dus distin­guuntur. Buxt. lex 1 Arieh, 2 Shacal, 3 Cephir, 4 La­ish, 5 Labi. two verses signifying the Lion, yet with a difference and special re­ference to the several ages, and conditions of the Lion. 1 The Lion, 2 the fierce Lion, 3 the young Lion, 4 the old Lion, 5 and the stout Lion: we have these five severall words in our translation, and we give Epithites to foure of them; whereas in the Hebrew they are all single termes, as we shall see in a briefe touch upon them.

First, the Lion (Arieh) which name is given the Lion, to note [...] from [...] ca [...]psit decerp­sit, alii dedu­cunt ab [...] Leo & [...] vid [...]t, quasi Leo videns, quia semper est oculis intentue ad praedam. his power in renting and tearing: and Master Broughton renders it so, the roaring of the renting Lion, putting the etymologie or no­tation of the word into the translation. Others derive it, from Arie, a Lion, and Raah which signifieth to see, and then it is as much as the Lion-seer; and the reason of this derivation is given, from the Lions watchfullnesse, he is ever intent upon his prey, and as some Naturalists observe, sleepes with his eyes open. So that this word entitles him, either from his watchfulness, The Lion-seer, or from his strength, The Lion-renter.

The second is a primitive, signifying sometime a Leopard, and [...] Leo ferox vel immanis mediae aetatis. sometime a Lionesse, or shee-lion. We render it a fierce Lion: which may well refer to the former, because a shee-lion, especially when she hath young ones, is exceeding fierce.

The third word it is (Cephir) a young Lion, and it is sometime used as an epithite (Cephir Arieth) a young Lion roared on Samp­son, Judg. 14. 5.

The fourth word is (Laish) signifying a Lion, that is grown in years, which perishes for hunger, not being able to hunt and get prey. So the Text, the old Lion perishes for lack of prey.

And the fifth word is (Laby) which signifies a Lion in greatest strength and fierceness. And the Critticks tells us, it is derived from Quasi leonem cordatum & animosum dicas Buxt. (Leb) which signifieth the heart, as noting a strong hearted and a couragious Lion; and so Master Broughton translates, for stout Lion, the heart-strong Laby. Judah being compared to this Lion by dying Jacob, is set forth by his majestick stoutnesse; Judah is a [Page 61] Lions whelp, &c. and as an old Lion, who shall rouze him up? Gen 49. 9.

These severall sorts of Lions shadow out unto us, mighty, strong and powerfull wicked men, or plowers of wickednesse, with all related to them; they, and their families, they, and their wives, they, and their children, all theirs are usually full of Lionlike qua­lities, and all these shall be destroyed and perish, by the blast, by the breath of God.

For, as the Apostle puts the question in another case, about Oxen, Doth God take care for Oxen? So if any should question here, is God angry with Lions? doth he oppose himself against Lions, that he saith here, the Lion shall perish, the young and the old Lions shall be destroyed?

No, there is a further meaning in it, somewhat else is shadowed under the name or notion of Lions. First, in Scripture the Lion sig­nifies any one in authority, especially in kingly authority, (Gen. 49. 10.) the tribe of Judah (which was to have the Scepter and the rule, the Magistracy or government being setled in that Tribe) is compared to a Lion, Judah is a Lions whelpe, from the prey my son thou art gone up, he stooped downe, he couched as a Lion, and as an old Lion, who shall rouze him up? As Lions are chiefe, the most eminent among the beasts of the field, so Kings and Magistrates are chiefe, the most eminent among the sons of men. Christ is called the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, from the prerogative of his power and the excellency of his Kingly condition above all others, his name being King of Kings, and Lord of Lords. Secondly, the Devil is compared to a Lion, he is called a roaring Lion, because of his cruelty and devouring nature, He goeth about like a roaring Lion seeking whom he may devoure. And the Lions here in the Text how old soever they be (are whelps of this old Lion) the Devil: not great men in general, but wicked great men, men mighty in power, and mighty in sin, mighty sinners. It is frequent in Scripture to sha­dow out powerfull, wicked, tyrannicall men by the name of Lions, and the reason is, because they imitate the qualities and conditions of the Lion. A man acts by reason, and a beast acts by sence or passi­on: reason is the difference between a man and a beast: therefore when man either acts against reason or without reason, the name of a beast is justly put upon him: and the name of that beast most fitly, whose qualities & passions he most resembles: man in regard of his headstrong unrulinesse, is compared unto a Horse and to a Mule, [Page 62] Psal. 32. 9. Be not as the Horse or as the Mule which have no un­derstanding, whose mouth must be held in wit with bit and bridle. Be not unruly. For subtilty, man is called a Fox; for flattery or filthi­nesse, a Dog or a Swine; and here for rapine and cruelty a Lion. Thus the Prophet Nahum elegantly, Chap. 2. 11, 12. Where is the dwelling place of the Lions, and the feeding place of the young Lions? that is, where is the dwelling place of oppressors and cru­ell tyrants? And Ezek. 19. 1, 2. Take up a lamentation for the Princes of Israel, and say, what is thy mother? a Lionesse, she lay down among Lions, she nourished her whelps among young Lions; the tyrannicall Princes in Israel, were thus described. And so is ty­rannicall Pharaoh (Ezek. 32. 2.) Take up a lamentation for Pha­raoh King of Egypt, and say unto him, thou art like a young Lion of the Nations. In generall Solomon (Prov. 28. 15.) telleth us, That as a roaring Lion and a ranging Beare, so is a wicked Ruler over the poore people. And the Apostle Paul speaking of his escape from the jawes of that persecuting Emperour, saith (2 Tim. 4. 17.) I was delivered out of the mouth of the Lion; that is, out of the mouth of Nero, who was ready with open mouth to devoure and destroy me: or as some (taking it for a proverbiall speech noting any eminent danger) I was delivered from the extreamest hazard of death: even as a man rescued out of a Lions mouth, and pull'd from between his teeth.

And it will not be amisse, for the clearing of this a little further, to give you some speciall things, wherein the resemblance may be taken, between the Tyrant, the oppressing Ruler, or any oppressing great one, and the Lion; we may draw the picture of a Tyrant by a Lions face in these respects.

1. In regard of his pride, statelinesse, and distance which he af­fects to hold, towards others. The Lyon is a proud and stately creature.

2. Tyrants resemble Lions in regard of courage and animosity. Couragiousnesse in any noble or good way (in which sence Prov. 28. 1. the righteous are bold as a Lion) is the courage of Saints. But to be valient and couragious in doing mischiefe, in wronging and oppressing the weak or innocent, is the courage of a Beast. Courage out of the way of truth and justice, is Lionlike cruelty.

3. They are Lions in regard of their strength. Lions are the stron­gest of creatures: what is stronger then a Lion, say they, in resol­ving Sampsons Riddle: and Prov. 30. 30. a Lion which is strongest [Page 63] among beasts: tyranny must have strength to back it. Hence they who meane to oppresse, fortifie themselves with titles and privi­ledges, with honours and relations. Solomon considering the op­pressions that were under the Sun, observes tears on the one side, and strength on the other; On the side of the oppressors there was power, Eccles. 4. 1.

4. They are Lions too, in regard of their subtilty; The Lion is a subtle creature, as well as a strong creature, he hath a great stock of policy, as well as power: though we usually oppose the Lions skin, and the Foxes skin, yet many times they both meete in one; Some are double skin'd as well as double cloath'd: Hence we have that phrase, Psal. 10. 9. (comparing a wicked man to a Lion) he lieth in waite secretly, as a Lion in his den; which teacheth us, that the Lion waites and watches for his prey; And so doe these wicked men, (Psal. 17. 12.) Like as a Lion that is greedy of his prey, and as it were a young Lion, lurking in secret places.

5. They are like Lions especially in their cruelty, in blood-suc­king cruelty; the Lion is a devouring beast, therefore when the Devill is called a Lion, it is said, he goeth about to devoure. And God himselfe (when he would be exprest in his resolutions of judgement, so as he will not have mercy upon a man, or upon a nation) is pleased to take upon him this name too, Hos. 5. 14. I will be unto Ephraim as a Lion, and as a young Lion to the house of Judah, I, even I, will teare and goe away, and none shall rescue him; that is, I am resolved to execute judgement, to the uttermost upon him; So Chap. 6. 1. The Lord hath torne, which is (proper­ly) the act of a Lion: And Job (Chap. 10. 16.) complaines thus to God, Thoa huntest me like a fierce Lion: And (Isa. 38. 13.) Hezekiah fearing, that God would not shew him that mercy, to raise him from sicknesse, cries out, as a Lion, so will he break all my bones. So that when the Lord would expresse himselfe in ways of judgement, and resolvednesse to goe on in judgement, he takes upon him the name of a Lion; But such is the very nature of wicked men: Such the Prophet Micha bespeaks (Chap. 3. 2.) Heare this O heads of Jacob, and ye Princes of the house of Israel, it is not for you to know judgement? who hate the good and love the evill, who pluck off their skins from off them, and their flesh from off their bones; noting Lion-like cruelty in those, who should have been as sheapheards to feed and protect the people.

6. They are compared to Lions, in regard of their terrible roa­ring, [Page 64] the Lyon roareth terribly; so terribly, that when the Lyon Animalia for­tia vocem edunt gravem ut Leo & Taurus. Arist. Tanta illi v [...] ­cis eliciendae natura praesti­tit instrumenta ut animalia lon gè ipso celeriora solo saepe rugitu capiantur Ba­sil. Hexam. Ho­mil. 9. Leo aliquid nu­bu habet circa super cilia, sc. aspectum mi­nimè serenum. Arist. roareth, the beasts of the forrest tremble. The Naturalists observe, that though many creatures are swifter of foot, then the Lion, yet when he roareth, they fall downe, and he overtakes them with his astonishing voyce; so tyrannicall men, with their roaring words, their loud threatnings, often affright and daunt the poor.

7. They resemble Lions, in the sowrenesse and sternenesse of their countenance, and cloudinesse of their browes. Much of mans heart is seene in his face; frownes are as blowes; hence we call it, brow-beating: The love of God, is expressed by the pleasant­nesse of his face, and the light of his countenance; So also is the love of man; and we may see what the intent of another is, in his very lookes: Many are in this respect, Lion-like men, they have (as Aristotle saith of the naturall Lion) clouds and stormes hanging about their eye-browes. It was a threatning against the Jewes, in case of disobedience, that God would send against them, a Nation of a fierce countenance, which should not regard the person of the old, &c. Deut. 28. 50.

Lastly, they are like Lions, in regard of their greedinesse after prey; They have set their eyes bowing downe to the earth, like as a Lyon that is greedy of his prey, Psal. 17. 11, 12.

Thus you see, both who are here meant by Lions, and likewise, how the resemblance or picture of a wicked man, may be taken from a Lion.

Now when it is said, that, the teeth of the Lions are broken, that the old Lions perish, and the young Lions are scattered abroad: By all these expressions of scattering, perishing and being broken to peeces, the Holy Ghost shewes us, the utter, full and finall con­sumption of wicked men; they are not only touched, troubled and roused up out of their dens; but these Lions, old and young, are scattered and consumed, They perish.

There is an opinion currant among the Jewish writers, that this verse is to be understood, as a description of the means or instru­ments by which God destroyes wicked men, and not (as we) of wicked men themselves, whom God will destroy: Junius agrees with this interpretation of the Jewes, translating the two verses in this sence; By the blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his nostrils they are consumed; by the roariag of the Lion; and by the voyce of the fierce Lion, and by the teeth of young Lions they are consumed; As if when wicked men (so he giveth the glosse) [Page 65] are not destroyed immediately by the breath, and by the blast of God, then God stirres up the creatures against them, and will de­stroy them by Lions: We know it was a speciall judgement threat­ned in the Law, against the disobedient, (Levit. 26. 22.) that God would send evill beasts among them: The Prophet numbers this, among Gods sore judgements: Sword, famine, pestilence and evill beasts are put together. In the history of the Kings, we have a fa­mous 2 King. 17. [...] record, how the Lord sent Lions, who slew some of those Idolaters, whom the King of Bahylon had transplanted into the Cities of Samaria.

But I rather conceive the former exposition of the words, to be the truth, and most sutable to the context; and there is this rea­son to be given, because it agrees best with the purpose of Eliphaz, whose worke was, so to describe the destruction of wicked men in generall, that he might particularly intimate the destruction, fallen upon Job and his family, with the reason of it. Job was a great man in his time; he was among men, as the Lion among beasts, a chiefe. His friends thought him a cruell Lion too, and so he is told to his face afterward, by one of them, that he (like a greedy Lion) had taken away the pledge, and the garment from the poore; This Eli­phaz would hint at least to Job, and that God had found him out in his Lion-like qualities; that he being a Magistrate, and a man in authority, having dealt hardly and cruelly with others, now the Lord had measured to him, the same measure he had given others; He, the Lion; and she, the fierce Lion or Lionesse his wife; they, the young Lions, his children, were all broken, and either perished or perishing. So much for the cleering of the words; I shall now adde some observations from them.

First, Wicked men, how powerfull, how strong soever, shall fall before the wrath and indignation of God. The day of the Lord shall be against every one that is high, and that is lifted up. God desires in a speciall manner, to be dealing with these, for they, in the pride of their spirits, think themselves a match for God; though indeed, their strength be but weaknesse, and their wisdome foo­lishnesse; yet in their own conceits they are stronger, and wiser then God himselfe. Hence (like Pharaoh) they send defiance to Hea­ven, and say, Who is the Lord, Exod. 5. 1. When God sees the hearts of men swolne to this height, of insolent madnesse, he de­lights to shew himselfe, and graple with them, that the pride of man may be abased, and every one that is exalted may be laid low: [Page 66] that he only may be exalted, and his Name set up in that day; Da­vid was much troubled, at that murther of Abner, yet he could not take vengeance presently, upon the fierce Lion, that had suckt his blood. Why? his power did not reach it, ye sonnes of Zer­viah (saith he) are too hard for me, (2 Sam. 23. 3.) But there are no sonnes of Zerviah too hard for God, no Lions so strong, but he can teare them, with infinitely more ease, then a Lion can the tender kid.

This should comfort us, when we see great and potent enemies rising up against the Church, what are these before the great Lion, the Lion of the Tribe of Judah. If the Lord doe but roare, if the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, come against these Lions, they will run like a heard of fearfull deare: The Kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chiefe Captaines, and the mighty men, are described, trembling at the presence of Christ, when he appeared but as a Lambe, Rev. 6. 15, 16. They cry to the mountaines and the rockes, to fall upon them, and to hide them from his face; If when Christ appeares like an angry Lambe, the greatest in the world fall before him; what then will these doe, when Christ shall appeare as a roaring Lion.

Secondly observe, how gradually the Holy Ghost expresses the destruction of wicked tyrants; All is not done at once; First the roaring of the Lion doth perish, then their voice, then their teeth are pulled out, next, their prey is taken away, lastly, their whelps are scattered. Note hence, That usually God destroyes wicked men by degrees.

Here are five steps or degrees of Gods justice, against these Lions.

First, He stops the roaring of the Lions, they shall not be able to make such a dreadfull noise as heretofore; their roaring may be stopt, when their voice is not, though they can speake, yet they shall not yell.

In the second place, He breakes the very voice of the Lions; they shall not only not roare, but they shall not so much as speake, either against the lambes, or against the sheepe, or for themselves, the voice of the fierce Lion shall be taken away. God is able to silence Lions, and stop their mouths, not only from devouring and roa­ring, but from speaking.

Thirdly, When their voice is taken away and their roaring, yet their teeth may remaine: and there will be biting and tearing still, though they have done roaring and yelling; therefore with a third [Page 67] stroake God breakes out their teeth, the teeth of the young Lions are broken. So the Psalmist prayes, Psal. 58. 6. Breake their teeth in their mouthes, breake out the great teeth of the young Lions O Lord: that is, take away the instruments, by which they oppresse, the meanes by which they teare and rend, as Lions with their cruell teeth.

Fourthly, Christ deales further with these Lions, he not only breakes their teeth, by which they used to hurt others, but he takes away their prey and their meate, they shall not have wherewith to live themselves; they were wont to suck the blood of the slaine, and to eate the flesh of the poore; but now the Lord will pluck away their prey, they themselves shall be starved or pincht with hunger.

Lastly, Not only shall their meate be taken away, but they them­selves shall be scattered and dispersed, that is the last step of their calamity. Their dens shall be broken up, and their lurking places shall be opened; they shall run from place to place▪ from Nation to Nation. This is the judgement of the Lord upon Lions, and the portion of the cruell enemies from our God.

Who hath not seen the truth of all this in our dayes; we have had Lions, roaring Lions, rending, tearing Lions amongst us: It was usuall among the Heathens in their persecutions, to cry out, Away with the Christians to the Lions: This we have often Christianos ad Leones. seene, in the figure, poore Christians sent to the Lions, put under the power of men, as cruell, as bloody, as insatiable as Lions: Many a one might say (as David, Psal. 57. 4.) My soule is among Lions: When the watch-man (in the Prophet) was asked, Watch-man what of the night? he answered. A Lion my Lord (Isa. 21. 7.) Our sorrowfull watch-men, standing upon their Towres, (con­sidering those sad times) being asked, what of the day? have an­swered, We see a Lion, a company of Lions. tearing and rending in many parts of the Nation; not bodies and estates only, but soules and consciences. God hath wonderfully delivered his darling from the Lions, his Daniels from the Lions den: He hath already delivered us so farre, that the Lions dare not roare, as they were wont, the teeth of many of the young Lions are broken, many of the old Lions are ready to perish for want of prey, and not a few of their whelps are scattered abroad; God hath raised up Samp­sons to teare these Lions, which roared upon us; he hath stirred up Davids to smite these Lions, and rescue the prey out of their teeth: [Page 68] And though many Lions are amongst us, yet they dare not roare, much lesse, teare as they have done; though the beasts be alive, yet (for the most part) the Lions are dead: they are beasts still, as base, and vile, and bloody in their natures as ever, but their pow­erfull Lion-like strength is abated: That glorious prophecie, is in some sense, and in some part, fulfilled at this day; The wholfe dwels with the lambe, the leopard lies downe with the kid, and the calfe and the young lion, and the fatling together, and a little childe may leade them; they cannot, they dare not, hurt nor destroy in all our mountaine, Isa. 11. 6, 8. I am sure, we may set our seale to this truth of Eliphaz, we have seene Lions, and fierce Lions, old Lions, and young Lions, even the stout Lions whelps, some scattered abroad, some destroyed, some consumed by the mighty power of God.

Further, It is here said in the text, That the old Lion shall pe­rish for want of prey: It is a strange expression, Lions have the greatest power to get provision, to satisfie their hunger, yea their appetites and humour, yet these shall want; these Lions, who have all their life time, preyed upon the estates of other men, even these shall want. Note hence the justice of God; Such as have made others want, shall at last come to want themselves, they shall perish for want of prey, they shall have nothing to eate: when thou cea­sest to spoile, thou shalt be spoiled, saith the Prophet; and when Isa 33. 1. thou shalt make an end to deale treacherously, they shall deale trea­cherously with thee: We must not understand it, as if wicked men doe ever give over sinning, sinne, and their desire of sinning, is in a kinde infinite: they never say, now we have done, and will sin no more; but the meaning is, when thou canst sin no more, nor deale treacherously any more, when thou hast done thy utmost, and spent thy strength in spoiling others, or taken all their spoile, so that thou hast done spoiling, because there is no more to spoile, then others shall spoile thee; And thou Lion, who hast preyed upon others a long time, shalt not have a bit thy selfe, but shalt pe­rish for want of prey.

It is the promise of God unto his own people (Psal. 34. 10. That the Lions shall lack and suffer hunger, but they that feare the Lord, shall not want any good thing: He expresses it by Lions, to note, that certainly they that feare him shall not want, for if any creatures in the world can preserve themselves from hunger, Lions can; if they doe but roare, the very beasts will fall downe as a [Page 69] prey before them, but yet (saith God) these even these shall ra­ther perish for hunger, than any one that feareth me shall want. God provides for his lambes, for innocent persons, for those who feare him, though they have no strength to provide for them­selves; but the wicked who have greatest power, and have been most active to provide for themselves, shall pine with want; they who have caused so many to be bitten with hunger, shall at last be hunger-bitten, and for want of meate, gnaw their tongues.

Lastly, Where it is said, that the Lions whelps are scattered a­broad, Observe, God will not onely destroy the persons of wicked men, but their families and posterities, they and their whelps shall all be scattered; he will not leave them so much, as a name or a re­membrance, (Psal. 36. 6.) I sought his place (saith the Prophet) and he could not be found; there was no print of him, no man could remember, that there was such a man in the world, unlesse to curse his memory.

I shall only give one caution respecting this, and so conclude the point. That which is here affirmed in the generall by Eliphaz, concerning the destruction of wicked men, Lions and fierce Lions, is not to be taken as a truth in the universall experience of it; we are not to understand it thus, as if all persons, all Lion-like persons at all times, perish, and are destroyed, and scattered abroad: But Eliphaz speaks of what is usually done: or he speaks of what God can easily doe at any time, and of what God may justly doe at all times. Lions, fierce Lions, tyrants, oppressors, he both may and can scatter when he pleaseth. Yet we find, that God hath permitted some Lions, to live fully, and to die quietly; they spend all their dayes in roaring and rending, in tearing and devouring, and yet themselves are not devoured: God often suspends this Justice, but it is for weighty reasons; for, in a word,

First, If God should destroy all Lion-like men, the joynts of the world would be unloosed, and the bands of humane society broken asunder. God forbad the children of Israel, to destroy all the Ca­naanites, least the beasts of the field should multiply, &c.

Secondly, If God should hunt all these Lions out of the world, his own people would live by sense, rather then by faith; and seeme to be terrified by the visible actings of wrath, rather then allured by the promises of mercy, or tenders of free-grace.

Thirdly, He deferres them, untill they have sucked blood e­nough, rent enough, and done evill enough, even fill'd up the [Page 70] measure of their sin, and fulfill'd the righteous purpose of God, by their unrighteousnesse. As these Lions fill their own bellies, so they fulfill Gods counsels, therefore he lets them alone, that they may doe his worke, though they little thinke of it, and lesse intend it.

Lastly, Eliphaz speaks of what God did frequently, in those times of the world, wherein they lived; for then God dealt more by out­ward judgements, then in these Gospel times. As his mercies are now more spirituall, so usually are his judgements.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 9, 10, 11.

Now a thing was secretly brought unto me, and mine eare re­ceived a little thereof.

In thoughts from the visions of the night, when deepe sieepe falleth on men, &c.

THis part of the Chapter, from the twelfth Verse unto the end, containeth the third Argument, by which Eliphaz labours to convince and reprove Job of his impatient complainings. In the whole context we may observe two generall parts.

  • 1. The Argument it selfe by which he reproves him.
  • 2. The confirmation or the proofe of that Argument.

The matter of the Argument, is contained in the seventeenth Verse. Shall mortall man be more just the God? shall a man be more pure than his Maker? The Argument may be formed thus.

That man carrieth himselfe rashly, and sinfully, who would seeme more just and pure then God, his Maker.

But thou Job carriest thy selfe as if thou wert more just, then God thy Maker.

Therefore thou carriest thy selfe very sinfully and rashly.

He confirmes this Argument two wayes.

  • 1. By an Argument taken from Divine authority.
  • 2. By an Argument taken from reason.

His Argument taken from Divine authority lies in the former five Verses of this context, (sc. 12, 13, 14, 15, & 16.) I may give it thus.

That is to be received as a truth, which God from heaven imme­diately declareth to his servant, in a vision.

But God hath declared and revealed this to me, in a vision, that [Page 71] he who contends with God, carrieth himselfe very sinfully.

Therefore it is to be received as a truth.

The first part of the Argument is unquestionable; that it is a truth which God revealeth from Heaven in a Vision. And that God had revealed this unto Eliphaz, from Heaven in a Vision, he himselfe at large declareth in those five Verses, describing both the manner how, and the time when this truth was revealed to him.

His second Argument from reason, is grounded upon the com­mon logicall rule, of arguing from the greater to the lesse, (Vers. 18, 19, 20, 21.) The summe of it may be thus conceived.

That which would be folly and sinfull boldnesse in Angels, if they should aspire and take upon them to doe, is much more sinfull in a mortall man.

But if Angels should goe about to justifie themselves, or stand upon termes with God, it would be sinne and folly in them.

Therefore it is much more sinne and folly in mortall man, to justifie himselfe before God, &c.

The Major or the first proposition is undeniable. The second proposition is proved and illustrated to the end of the Chapter. Wherein is shewed in what condition man now standeth: how weak and how poore a thing a man is compared unto an Angel; therefore if it would be sinne and folly in Angels to compare with God, it must much more be sinne and folly in man. So we see how Eliphaz confirmes the major proposition of the first Syllogisme.

The second proposition or assumption which he inferres upon Job, But thou Job carriest thy selfe so as if thou wert more just than God: he proves by that sad expostulation, Chap. 3. And takes that for granted. We may forme it thus.

He that complaineth of God, as if he had done him wrong, makes himselfe more just then God.

But thou Job, hast made such a complaint, Chap. 3. as if God had done thee wrong in afflicting thee, or in giving and in conti­nuing thy life under such afflictions.

Therefore, thou seemest to make thy selfe more just, then God, or to say that God hath dealt unjustly or injuriously with thee.

This I take to be the Logick of the remaining part of this Chapter.

And having cleared his manner of reasoning in generall, I shall descend to open particulars.

[Page 72] Now a thing was secretly brought unto me, and mine eare recei­ved a little thereof.

I must yet resolve a question before I explaine the tearms; the question is this. Whether this were a true vision sent from God, or whether it were only feined by Eliphaz, thereby to gain authority to what he spake?

There are many Expositors of great name, who are very confi­dent that this vision was a fiction or holy fraud; a vision of Eli­phaz his own braine, not a vision from Heaven. Some have gone further, maintaining that it was a vision sent from Hell, an illusion of the Devill, thereby to strengthen the hands of Eliphaz, in vex­ing and troubling Job.

It cannot be denied, but that many have pretended visions from God, when they have received none; they have belyed the Al­mighty with their Dreams and Revelations, when they have seen nothing. Thus (1 Kings 22. 11.) Zedekiah the false Prophet takes upon him, to have had a vision from God, by which he would con­firme Ahab in his counsell to goe up to Ramoth Gilead. And Ze­dekiah the sonne of Chenaanah made him hornes of iron, and he said, thus saith the Lord, with these shalt thou push the Syrians till thou have consumed them. And in the prophesie of Jeremiah you have Hananiah the false Prophet, not onely speaking the language, but dressing himselfe in all the formalities of a vision; he comes forth with a yoke upon his neck, and breakes it before the people, and telleth them, thus will God break the yoke of your captivity, and at such a time.

The true Prophets complaine often of the false, for crying up their deceivings, under the warrant of visions and dreams, when all was but a dreame indeed, a meere phancy, or studied imposture to mislead the people, and gaine credit to their lies. While a man hath nothing but ordinary humane authority, for things extraordi­nary, he is easily rejected.

Man is subject to error, he may deceive and be deceived; there­fore when they would put a new nothing upon the world, as an in­fallible truth, and have it swallowed without chewing, received without disputing, then usually they pretended that it was (quid Divinum) a doctrine or message received immediately from God. And it is well observed, that this course of pretending to Divine revelation, was very frequent amongst the Heathen: when their [Page 73] Wise men had a minde to fasten, some unwonted opinion upon the vulgar. Among the Romans, Numa, (to the intent they might be received with greater authority) stampt his lawes, with a kinde of divinity, and told the people that he had received them from the Goddesse Aegeria. As if he had said, these lawes, are not such as I have coyned and fashioned by my owne policy, drawne up or ena­cted by my own power, I had them from the Goddesse. So Plato informes us of another law-maker (Minos the Cretian) that he used to enter into Caves and solitary places, where (he told the peo­ple) he received lawes and immediate dictates from Jupiter their God, to governe them by. This drew a great estimation and reve­rence upon him. Valerius Maximus and Herodotus tels us of those Valer. lib. 1. Herod. lib. 1. other Law-makers, Licurgus and Seuleucus, using the like State­stratagems to over-rule the people. Licurgus said, he received his lawes from Apollo: Zaleucus and Pisistratus avouch, Minerva for the Directresse or Doctresse of Theirs. So that both among the people of God, and among Heathens, it hath been very frequent to pretend Divine authority; that they might with the more esti­mation put off either such points of doctrine, or such rules of poli­cy, as themselves had invented.

For this of Eliphaz, howsoever some charge him directly, and Rem in dubio relinquimus vi­detur tamen po­tius vera fuisse visio, e [...]s [...] ea a­bata [...]ur. Merc. others leave the matter in doubt, only turning the scale with a pro­bability, (it seemeth rather that it was a true vision.) Yet I shall ad­venture to resolve directly, that his was a true vision, as well as a vision of truth sent from God. And the reasons which sway with me are these three.

First, if we consider the manner of this vision, the description here made, holds exact proportion with those, of which there is no que­stion, but they were the Oracles of Heaven. When a thing is done as God doth it, it is some argument that God hath done it. I grant, this reason is not demonstrative or infallible, because Satan and our own hearts are very apt to make imitations of holy things, for sinfull ends. Satan can transforme himselfe into an Angel of light, and the heart can disguise or shape its own dark conceptions, by the light of divine revelations.

Take then a second reason, Eliphaz was a godly man. 'Tis gran­ted on all hands, that Eliphaz and his friends were right in their affections, though they failed in this action. God was angry with them indeed, & told them in the close of this dispute (Chap 42. 7.) That they had not spoken of him the thing that was right, as Job his [Page 74] servant had, yet he bids Job pray and offer sacrifice for them, which he would not have done, unlesse they had been upon good termes with him in generall, and in a present capacity, for mercy and ac­ceptance. Now it being supposed that Eliphaz was a godly man, it is a sinne not to be supposed of him, that he would make boast of a false revelation, and with such deliberate gravity put a lye upon God.

Thirdly, the matter which he professes to have received in this vision, is a great and a holy truth of God. Man never belyes God to confirme the truth of God. When any boast vainly of revelations, it is to confirme their own phancies and delusions. 'Tis rare when men are so zealous for truth, as to improve all that God hath spo­ken in the maintenance of it; I have not read of any that have fained a word from God, to maintaine that which is really the Word of God. We finde all along in Scripture, that when visions from God were falsely pretended, they ever tended to secure the heart in false opinions, or unwarrantable practises.

The Apostle Paul found many who falsified the stampe of the Spirit, and forged his hand and seale to establish error (2 Thess. 2. 2.) I beseech you brethren, that you be not soone shaken in minde, or be troubled either by spirit, or by word, or by letter, as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. That grosse error was scattered in the Church of Thessalonica, that the day of Christ was at hand, that in those beginnings of the Gospell, there should be an end of all things. To confirme this, false teachers boasted of the Spirit, an im­mediate revelation from God: or a word immediately from the mouth, or a Letter under the hand of Paul. How active is error to finde patronage? It cares not whom it belyes, so it selfe may passe for truth. Thousands love errours, but none will own them by that name. And therefore (because children bear their fathers name) they would father them upon the God of truth, or upon men, most emi­nent for truth. Montanus the Heretick, said he had the Holy Ghost his Paracl [...]te, dictating those erroneous doctrines to him, beside Histor. Eccl. l. 5 c. 14, 16. his Prophetesses, Prisca and Mavinilla. Mahomet, that Grand hel­lish Impostor often pretended visions from Heaven. And the story assures us that he cunningly made use of the disease of his body, to perswade his Disciples of the soundnesse of his doctrine. For being afflicted with the falling sicknesse, when at any time a fit was upon him he made the people believe that he was in an extasie or ravish­ment of spirit, at the appearance of the Angel Gabriel, who revea­led [Page 75] many mysteries to him. And having by long use and familia­rity taught a Pigeon to seed at his eare, he by art prevailed with the people, to feed at his poysonous mouth: as if his words had been the inspirations of the Holy Ghost, who (as he affirmed) came then to him, in the forme of a Dove, and taught him those secrets.

So then, this of Eliphaz was a true vision, because it was the con­firmation of a truth. Invented visions are in use only to gaine cre­dit to the inventions of man, or the visions of the Devill. Now for the matter and words themselves.

Now a thing was secretly brought unto me.

We translate [thing,] the Hebrew is [word,] A word was se­cretly [...]. Factum esse verbum alicut nihil aliud sig­nificat quam factam esse re­velationem in a [...]iquo, & De­um cognitione futurorum, in­star lumini [...] mentem illu­strasse. Cyril. in 1 cap. Hos. v 1. [...] brought unto me, but it is usuall both in Hebrew and Greek to call A thing, A word. Luk. 2. 15. The Shepherds said, Let us goe to Bethlem to see this thing, the Greek is, to see this word which is done. Though here, it is proper enough, to say, A word was brought unto me.

Now a thing, or a word, was brought unto me, it was brought unto me secretly. The language of the Prophets was, The word of the Lord came unto me. There are two words in our translation, (secretly brought,) but the Hebrew is one; and that word signifies to steale, or to do a thing by stealth; so it may be translated, A thing was brought unto me by stealth, or was stole into me: M Broughton near this, A speech came by stealth upon me; we translate fully to the sense, A thing was secretly brought to me, as if it were whis­pered into the eare, and sent in closely to the spirit. And it is thus expressed, by way of opposition to another way, in which God reveales his minde unto his people. He sometimes comes openly and speaks aloud, that all may take notice, or because all ought. Isa. 58. 1. Cry aloud, lift up thy voice like a Trumpet. Things are brought openly to the people, secretly to the Prophets; what the Lord speaks in the eare, or to the heart of a Prophet, that he by the Prophet speaks on the house top, to all his people. A thing was se­cretly brought, or a thing was whispered unto Eliphaz. But he speaks it aloud to Job. This word or this thing, is said to be stolne into him, or to be brought unto him by stealth, for three reasons, which I shall but name and proceed.

First, a thing done by stealth, is done suddenly. The Thiefe ha­stens to doe mischiefe, he makes no delayes. Then secondly, a thing done by stealth is done secretly: a Thiefe comes closely in the dark; [Page 76] stealth is committed with greatest privacy; and to say a thing is brought by stealth, is as much as to say, it is brought privately. Thirdly, a thing done by stealth, is done unexpectedly. A man sel­dome looks for the Thiefe, he is upon him in the way, upon him in his house, before he is aware. A Thiefe is usually as unexpected, as he is a [...] unwelcome guest So this word came or was brought in by stealth, because it came, suddely, it came silently, and it came unexpectedly to Eliphaz. And in these three respects, Christ himselfe is said to come as a Thiefe, Behold I come as a thiefe in Rev. 16. 15. the night. As the word of Christ comes to many of his people now, so the person of Christ will come at the last unto all, He will come by stealth, or as a thiefe, suddenly, secretly, unexpectedly, when the world shall little dreame of him, and his Church scarce be awake for him.

Note from this, first, That divine truths are infused into us, not borne in us, or borne with us; every thing which is of Heaven, commeth unto us from Heaven; it is either stolne in secretly, or thundred in loudly: sometimes the Prophets and Ministers of Christ, speaking aloud, carry truth into the soule: sometimes God whispers it into the soule; one way or other, truth must be brought in, for it growes not in us: our hearts by nature are not onely like white paper, having no inscription, not a letter of Gods will writ­ten in them, but they are like paper blotted or blurred, written all over with the corrupt principles, and positions of our own wils. God by his Spirit first crosses or wipes out those, and then writes down his own golden rules, of holy truth and heavenly wisdome. This he doth, first in conversion from sinne to grace and holinesse, and afterward in all the increases of grace, and growths of holi­nesse, There is not a syllable of the law of God in any mans heart, till the finger of God writes it there; I will put my law in their minde, and write it in their hearts, which is an allusion unto the two Tables of the Law. They were first written by the finger of God, and then put into the Ark: So God first writes the Law in our hearts, and then puts it into our mindes; he layes it up in the Ark of our understanding and memory.

Secondly observe, That God steales truths into the hearts of his people unawares. As they often expect and wait long for know­ledge, so they sometimes know before they expect. A truth either in whole or part, in the matter or clearer light of it, comes like a Thief into the heart, suddenly, secretly, unlooked for: in which case it is [Page 77] ever true, that truth unexpected is doubly welcom'd. The way of the Spirit of God is alwayes undiscernable to flesh and blood. The soule receives a thing, and the man knowes not how; he can (scarce pos­sibly, not at all) tell where, by whom, or which way it came to him; it was brought, secretly brought; and with a most blessed, gracious slight of hand, conveyed into his heart. Yet sometime truth enters in State, & may be said to make its passage visibly, into the heart of a man. The word comes, not as a company of Thieves, but as a band of Souldiers, with weapons drawn, and terrible shouts, tear­ing open the soule, and breaking open the iron gate of the heart, lock'd and barr'd with unbeliefe, to secure that cursed crue of lusts, garrison'd within it. The weapons of our warfare (saith the Apostle) are mighty, through God, 2 Cor. 10. 4. The word is mighty, won­derfull in strength, it comes upon the soule as an armed man, to spoyle it of all sinfull treasures, yea of the very life of sinne. Some­times the Lord proclaimes warre, as by a Herald of Armes against a man and openly prepares for his siege and battery. He surprises a­nother, and steals him into a happy captivity to himselfe.

A thing was secretly brought unto me, and mine eare received a little thereof.

Mine eare caught somewhat of it, so Mr. Broughton. The word [...] Pa [...]c [...]la, pars, medicum. signifies a part or a portion. Mine eare received a little: yet we are not to understand this, as if Eliphaz had taken in, onely some fragments or imperfect notes, of what God delivered, or had heard to halves. For doubtlesse Eliphaz received all that was brought, he turned nothing back; he said not a little is enough, I need not the rest; that he received but a little, was not from neglect of the rest, but from inability to receive more, or to receive it more per­fectly. And though he had not all of every part, yet he had a part of all; it was not a little of this, and none of that: little respects somewhat of every truth, not some one truth. He received, though not all, yet a perfect modell of all, that was brought.

Further, this speech may have reference unto our present condi­tion, concerning which the Apostle saith (1 Cor. 13.) We know but in part: now when he saith, we know but in part; it is not as if we had but a part of Gods will, made knowne unto us. The Word of God and the works of God are perfect. And the Apostle assures the Church of Ephesus, That he had not shunned to declare unto them the whole counsell of God, Acts 20. 27. The whole (which [Page 78] concernes man) is declared, but we know that whole but in part. Such is our weaknesse and infirmity, that we cannot take in All of All, no nor any part of all in the full latitude and extent of it; Thus we know but in part; so saith Eliphaz, when this was brought to me, mine eare received but little of it; my narrow eare could drinke in, but some drops of that ocean, which was poured out up­on me. All that man apprehends, is but little, in respect of what Modestè loqui­ [...]ur, qu [...]si n [...]n plenè acceper [...]t, quod sciend [...]m esset de hac [...]e. Quod optimum est & eximiam comprehen­dere non potest mortalis homo. Mercer. God offers now, or of what hereafter he shall apprehend. Eliphaz speakes modestly and humbly of himselfe; God brought a thing unto me, and I am such a poore streightned vessell, that I could re­ceive but a little of it; yet somewhat I caught hold of, which I am about to make known unto thee.

We may note from this. First, Holy truths, are very pleasant to the eare of a holy person. A thing was brought unto me, and mine eare caught a little of it; As when meates pleasant to the tast, are brought to a man, he puts forth his hand and takes them; or when pleasant musique sounds, the eare catches it, or we drinke it in greedily at the eare; so when holy truths are revealed, a holy heart catches them: The eare is not more affected with pleasant musique, or the pallate with pleasant meates, then the un­derstanding spiritualiz'd, is affected with spirituall truths; The eare of a holy man takes in holy things with pleasure, and therefore he is said to catch them, or drinke them in, as, with much desire and ravishing delight: David sound more sweetnesse in the truths of God, then in the honey or honey combe. The spirit of a regenerate man, doth so much catch heavenly Doctrine, that in the Hebrew, the word which signifies such doctrine, signifies also catching or receiving; and a word from the same roote, signifies the palate Vide Buxtorf. Lex. in verto [...] of the mouth; which may hint us thus much, that heavenly doc­trine, pleases the palate or taste of a heavenly minde; And the rea­son of it is, because there is a suitablenesse in the heart of every godly man, with every truth of God; All delight arises from pro­portion and suitablenesse, between the object and the organ, in sensitives: between the object and the understanding, will, affe­ctions, in spirituals; That, which makes delight to the eye, is the sutablenesse of visibles to the eye: and that which makes delight the taste, is the sutablenesse of edibles to the pallate: and so that which makes delight to the soule, is the sutablenesse of intelligibles to the understanding: Hence the reason is cleere, why wicked men will not receive the things of God, but insteed of catching them, [Page 79] catch at them, snarle and murmure at them, speake, yea raile and fight against them; their hearts are unsutable to those truths, there­fore they distast them, therefore they relish them no more, then the white of an egge, or a dry stick. Nay, not only have they no pleasant taste, but they have a bitter tast in their mouthes, they are as gall and wormewood to them, they are a vexation and torment to them: The truth which the two Witnesses publish, torments Revel. 11. them that dwell on the earth; and then no marvaile if instead of catching those truths, to embrace them, they catcht the Witnesses and kill them.

Observe secondly; That the eare and heart of man in this state of corruption, are vessels too narrow, to take in or hold all the truths of God. I have many things to say, (saith Christ to his Disciples) but ye cannot beare them now, Joh. 16. 12. Nor could they ever fully beare, so much as Christ had to say. We have line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, and there a little, Isa. 28. 10. be­cause it is but here and there a little, some few lines or precepts, which we are able to learne, and digest into our spirits; whole showers of divine truths, are often rained upon us (Heb. 6.) yet we drinke in but a drop or two; we swimme, as it were, in a whole ocean, a sea of holy revelations, but we are narrow-necked-bot­tles, and how little is it which bubbleth in? mine eare received a little thereof. The truth of God, is like God himselfe, infinite; Truth is nothing else but the minde of God, and that is infinite; therefore we who are not only finite, but streightned, cannot pos­sibly comprehend it.

Thirdly, Mine eare received a little thereof; it was but a lit­tle he received, yet he received a little, all did not fall beside his eare, all did not slip away, he caught somewhat: Note from hence, That the eare and heart of a godly man, ever receive somewhat, when the truths of God are revealed. I cannot get in all, my heart will not receive all, my memory will not retaine all, but a little it will hold, somewhat it takes in at every Sermon, and from every vision of God; (Sermons are the visions of God, and somewhat of Gods mind is brought to you in every holy Sermon.) Naturall men are like sieves, like vessels without a bottome, or full of holes, into which these truths being put, run out every drop: the best, in this life, are leaking vessels, much drops out; Eliphaz received a little; How many heare much and receive nothing? They come empty to the Ordinances, and they returne empty: their ea [...]es have [Page 80] been fill'd with a sound, but their hearts have not caught a sillable, not a word of truth is written in their hearts, not a letter laid up in their minds: And that's the reason, why not a word is to be seen in their lives; How can they hold out the word in a pure con­versation, who have not received it into a pure conscience?

In thoughts from the visions of the night, when deepe sleepe falleth on men.

The former Verse, shewed us the manner how, that thing was brought to Eliphaz, a thing was secretly brought to me; this shewes the time when it was brought, it was (saith he) in thoughts from the visions of the night, when deepe sleepe falleth on men.

In thoughts from the visions of the night.] Some reade it, in the Vel post visio nes noctis, sicut dicimus à coena à [...]randio, sic Hos. 6. 2. vel [...]n cogitationi­bu [...] vis [...]num noctis, ut Mem, Genitivum in­d [...]cet. [...] thoughts which I had, after the visions of the night. So Hos. 6. 2. From two dayes, Heb. After two dayes; or, in thoughts which I had in the visions of the night, or, in thoughts of the visions of the night; The Originall beares any of these readings.

In thoughts.] The Hebrew word, signifies properly the boughes of a tree; and so some translate; In the bougbes, sprigs or bran­ches of the visions of the night: but we render it well, in the thoughts: And thoughts are called boughes or branches; First, because thoughts grow from the mind, sprout and shoote up from the minde, as branches from the stock of a tree; From the root or stock of a mans understanding, a branch of thoughts growes up, sometimes like a tall Cedar of Libanus, as high as Heaven. Second­ly, the boughes and branches of a tree, are many, thick, interwo­ven, and crossing one another; such are the thoughts of a man, he hath many, even multitudes of them; In the multitude of my thoughts, saith David? The mind puts forth many branches and twiggs, they sprout and shoote forth every way; thousands of various thoughts are moving, upon various objects, and to various ends; some are earthly, some heavenly. The branches of some minds, are but bryars and thornes; others bear the Lilly and the Rose, their roote is in Heaven, and they grow heavenward. Third­ly, thoughts are called branches, because the branch or the bough, brings forth and beares the fruit; the stock or the body of a tree, brings forth fruit, at the branches: So all the fruit of our soules, is borne upon, or from our thoughts; our actions are the fruits of our thinkings: Thoughts are possible actions; looke what a man thinketh, that he doth, or would doe: And such as our thoughts [Page 81] are, such our actions are, or would be: Thoughts are the first­borne, the blossomes & bloomes of the soule, the beginnings of our strength, whether for good or evill; therefore the Hebrew word, is elegantly translated from a bough or a beanch, to a thought.

The Hebrew word for speech, prayer and meditation, springs [...] Stirps, f [...]u [...]ex. quia Sermo è corde, ut arbor è terra nasci­tur. Shind. Elegans meta­ph [...]a sumpta à super eminenti­bus arbo [...]um ramusculis (& est p [...]imogenta hujus vo [...]is sig­nificatio) ad phantasmatum extremitates ac velut tene­ras cogitatio­num summita­tes notionem suam extendit. Bold. Quous (que) claudi­catis inter duas prominentias. Merc. Quasi Elias audueret popu­lum, quod duas eminentias sibi constituerent, Deum & Baa­lem quasi ae­quales, inter quas nulla est comparatio. 2 Cor. 6. 15. Bold. from a roote of the same signification; because speech, prayer and meditation, spring up from the Spirit as a stalke, or branches from the stock of a tree.

There is one thing further to be observed from this word (for it is a very elegant word, and therefore I spend a little the more time upon it) In thoughts from the visions of the night; The word signifies, not onely a bough, but the highest bough, the top­bough of a tree: A tree hath some under-boughs, and some top­boughes, as the Prophet speakes (Isa. 17. 6.) Two or three ber­ries in the top of the uppermost bough: it is the same word, which here in the text, we translate thoughts; as if Eliphaz should say, in my very uppermost, or highest thoughts, in those very top-bran­ches of my budding phancie, which I had from the visions of the night. The highest, the top-branches which grow from the soule of a godly man, are for, or about the highest mercies, top-mercies, for Heaven and heavenly things. A wicked mans highest and up­permost thoughts are for the earth, his thoughts for the earth, out­grow all his other thoughts: But a godly mans thoughts, for Hea­ven and spirituals▪ outgrow all his other thoughts, his thoughts for Heaven, are the highest and uppermost branches of his soule. We have this word used, in the 1 Kings 18. 21. How long (saith Eli­jah) will you halt between two opinions? That word which we there translate opinions, is here translated thoughts; hence some render that in the Kings thus, How long doe ye halt between two top-thoughts, or high thoughts? As if this were the thing, which Elijah reproved in that people, that they had high thoughts, both of God and of Baal, top-thoughts of both: and they (as it were) set Baal, a dumb Idol, as high in their thoughts, estimations and opi­nions, as they did the living God. Why do ye halt between two up­permost opinions, highest thoughts, or thoughts of equall height, concerning God and Baal? Your thoughts of your Idol, are as high as of God himselfe. What! will you make an Idoll, equall with God? An Idoll is a base thing, a low thing, a thing below up­on the dung-hill (therefore called a dunghill god) The true God, is on high, he is in the highest Heavens, he is higher than the Hea­ven [Page 82] of Heavens, and doe you debase him thus, by halting between two thoughts of equall height, concerning Him and Baal? They who set up an Idol, make it equall unto God. All false worship is a setting of our posts by Gods posts, and of our threshold by his threshold, a making both, of equall height and worth.

And to cleere it yet further; (Psal. 119. 13.) the same word is used by David, when he professes, I hate vaine thoughts, or as some reade it, I hate vaine things; He calls Idolatrous thoughts vaine thoughts, because they are wavering, inconstant or unsetled thoughts, in further allusion to the boughes of a tree: as the top-most and highest boughes of a tree, are shaken with every puffe of wind, and waver too and fro with every blast, so are the thoughts Quasi dicat I­dolatriam odio habui, quae plu­ra eminentia supremo cultu reveretur, cum sit unum. of Idolaters: or because (as before) Idolatry sets up Too high Thoughts, adoring an Idoll as much, or in competition and rivali­ty with the everliving God. The higher our thoughts are of God, the more excellent they are; but the higher our thoughts are of false worship, the vainer they are; and to have as high thoughts of an Idoll, as of the living and true God, are the vainest thoughts of all; those high thoughts are low thoughts, the lowest thoughts, thoughts most hatefull, I hate vaine thoughts.

From the visions of the night.] As I have opened that word about the thoughts somewhat largely, so this of the visions, requires more enlargement, yet I shall doe it as briefely as I may.

Visions were a speciall way of divine revelation: Heb. 1. 1. God who at sundry times, and in divers manners, spake to our Fa­thers [...]. by the Prophets, saith the Apostle. God spake at sundry times, and he spake in divers manners. Now amongst those divers manners of speaking, speaking by or in visions was one. The Jewish Doctors, observe foure degrees of divine revelation. The first they Paulus Fagius, in Exod. 28. called Prophecie, which included vision, and any apparition where­by the will of God was made known. They had a second way of Goodw. Hebr. Antiq. divine revelation, which they called, The inspiration of the Holy Ghost, whereby the party was inabled, without vision or appa­rition, to prophesie: either as prophesying is taken for the foretel­ling of things to come, or for the resolving of things in doubt: The Rabbins give us the difference between these two, prophecie and inspiration: In prophecie (though it was from the Holy Ghost) a man was cast into a trance, or brought into an extasie, his senses being taken away; but speaking by inspiration of the Ho­ly Ghost, was without any such change in, or impressions upon the [Page 83] body; So David, and other Pen-men of the Scriptures, wrote by the immediate inspiration of the Holy Ghost, yet without visible apparitions to them, or visible change upon them. Thirdly, God revealed himselfe, by Ʋrim and Thummim, which was an answer given by the Ephod, or by the stones that were on the breast-plate of the high Priest. These three wayes of divine revelation (as they observe) ceased in the second Temple. The Jewish writers having this tradition, That after the latter Prophets, Haggai, Zechariah and Malachy, the Holy Ghost departed from Israel; meaning, the Holy Ghost (not in the ordinarie work of sanctification, but) in those extraordinary wayes of prophecy, inspiration, and of Ʋrim and Thummim, went up and departed from them. There was yet a fourth way of divine revelation, which they call Bathcoll, the daughter of a voice, or eccho, declaring the will of God immedi­ately from Heaven: such some conceive to be, the voice heard from Heaven, Math. 3. 1. proclaiming the testimonie of God concern­ing Christ, a voice was heard from Heaven, saying, this is my belo­ved Sonne, in whom I am well pleased.

But to passe from these traditions of the Jewes, we shall give you the doctrine of divine revelations, more distinctly from the Scriptures. We finde (Numb. 12. 6, 7, 8.) three distinct wayes, in which the Lord revealed himselfe of old unto his people. If there be a Prophet among you, I the Lord will make my selfe known unto him in a vision, and will speake unto him in a dreame; My ser­vant Moses is not so, who is faithfull in all mine house, with him will I speake mouth to mouth, even apparently; and not in darke speeches, and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold. This is an illustrious text, describing three distinct wayes or degrees of holy revelation. First, by vision which we have here in Job. Secondly, by a Dreame, which was when God presented somewhat to them sleeping: This kinde of revelation God vouchsafed, not only to his own people and Prophets, but to Heathens also and strangers from his Covenant. Pharaoh had a revelation by a dreame (Gen. 41.) concerning the seven yeares of famine; and Nebuchadnezzar had a wonderfull revelation by a dreame (Dan. 2.) concerning the state of the foure Monarchies. The wise men of the East, were warned in a dreame, to returne into their Countrey another way, Math. 2. But with the Saints, these revelations by dreames, were very frequent; Jacob (Gen. 28.) in a dreame, as he slept upon a stone, saw a ladder, &c. Joseph, Jacobs son, had so many dreames, [Page 84] that his brethren jeered him with it, and called him, the Captaine-dreamer, The dreamer, a Master of dreames, Gen. 37. 19. Jo­seph [...] the husband of Mary, was twice warned in a dreame, first that he should not forsake his wife, Mat. 1. and then that he should goe into Egypt, Mat. 3. Many other the like revelations by dreames, might be instanced in, but I forbeare. There is a third way spoken of in this text, and that is, speaking mouth to mouth; my servant Moses is not so, with him will I speake mouth to mouth, even apparently. This is a more eminent way of heavenly mani­festations than the former; Moses had a priviledge above the or­dinary Prophets. For to speake mouth to mouth, is expounded (by Apparently) I will speake plainely or apparently, not in a vision or in a dreame; When a man speakes mouth to mouth to his friend, or (as the Scripture phrases our communion with God, in Hea­ven) face to face; This is opposed to a more remote or obscure communion. As our seeing God face to face in Heaven, so his speaking to us, mouth to mouth on earth, notes the clearest and fullest revelation: It is to give us his minde, nakedly, without any figure or shadow; or (as Christ is said once in the Gospel) to speake plainely, and not in Parables. And these speakings mouth to mouth, were of two sorts: Either immediate, as himselfe did unto Moses, or as to others, by the ministry of Angels; God of­ten employed Angels in this service, to declare his minde, and bring messages to his people; This was a kinde of speaking mouth to mouth: but Moses had an honour beyond this, with him will I speake mouth to mouth, I by my selfe, not I, by a created Angell.

Visions (to keep to the terme in hand) were (you see) a prin­cipall meanes, by which God broke his minde, and unlockt the se­crets of his counsels. If there be a Prophet among you, I the Lord will make my selfe known unto him in a vision. And to cleere this point about visions yet more fully; We may distinguish of divers sorts of visions. First, A vision is sometime put for any ordinary dispensation of the will of God, to his Prophets or Ministers, who as from God, dispense it to his people, (Prov. 29. 18.) Where vi­sion faileth, the people perish, that is, where there are none to pub­lish and declare the minde of God (no not in an ordinary way) to a people, that people are in the ready way to perdition. Without the visions of grace, there is no ordinary way to the visions of glory. Secondly, By a vision, we understand an extraordinary work of [Page 85] God, manifesting his minde to his Prophets, either to assure future successes, or to resolve doubtfull Quaeries: And these were called Visio est omnis doct [...]ina d [...]vi­ni [...]ùs revelata; quia Deus qui­buscun (que) vsum est revelare, res ipsas quo­dam [...]do viden­das & spectan­das oculis ser­vorum suo um exhibet ad ob­signandam ea­rum certitudi­nem. Jun. in 1 cap. Isa. visions, because by them things were made so manifest, as if they had been seene before their eyes: and in some of these revelations, a visible representation was made to the eye: visions were often attended with apparitions; In reference to both these sorts of vi­sions, that is appliable, 1 Sam. 9. 9. Before time in Israel, when a man went to enquire of God, thus he spake; Come let us goe to the Seer, for he that is now called a Prophet, was before time called a Seer: Prophets were called Seers, because in visions, they had either an ocular, or an intellectuall sight of the minde of God.

Secondly, Visions may undergoe this division: There was an o­pen vision, and there was a private vision: In the 1 Sam. 3. 1. we have the ground of the distinction, In those dayes there was no o­pen vision: Open, is opposed to private or secret; the word im­ports, a vision appearing in publique, and the meaning of the text is this; there were no Prophets sent openly, and (as it were) In State, invested with commission, and furnished with messages Fuerantquidem singulares & privatae, visio­nes cum pijs communicatae, ut cum Ma­noah. Judic. 13 Sed publi [...]è Prophetarum o [...]ne munus ja­cebat. Jun. in loc. from Heaven unto the people; there was no open vision: yet at that time there were private visions, as to Manoah, Judg. 13. God revealed himselfe in those darke times, to some of his speciall ser­vants: And so he hath and will at all times. While he hath a Church upon the earth, he never shuts himselfe quite in Heaven. Open vi­sion may faile, but all visions shall not faile. So open profession may faile in the raigne of Antichrist, in his houre, and in the power of darknesse; as it did in the time of Eliah, yet all profession of the truth shall never faile: The Lord hath alwayes his thousands in secret, who never bowed their knee to Baal. In many places, since Christ came in the flesh, there hath been no open vision, no holding forth of the truth of Christ, and yet even in those places, there have been private visions; and a remnant reserved, to whom God hath made known the mysteries, of the Kingdome of Christ: When dark­nesse covers all in appearance, there may be light which appeares not: and candles under a bushell, when there are none in the Candlesticks. A Goshen hath light, while Egypt is plagued with darknesse; and when the Prophets are benighted, it may be day, with many of the people.

Thirdly, Some visions were without any trance or ravishment, (Gen. 15. 1.) The word of God came in a vision to Abraham, speaking to his eare, and bidding him look up to Heaven with his [Page 86] eyes, ver. 5. But often we finde, that visions were accompanied with trances: 'Twas so with Balaam the false Prophet, (Num. 24. 16.) He hath said, which saw the visions rf the Almighty, falling in­to a trance, but having his eyes open: And it was so with some of the true Prophets, Daniel saw a vision, and when he heard the voice, Then (saith he) was I in a deepe sleepe upon my face, (Dan. 10. 9.) Peter was in a trance, when he had the vision of a sheete let downe from Heaven, Act. 10. And the Apostle saith, (2 Cor. 12. 1.) I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord, whether in the body I cannot tell, or whether out of the body I cannot tell, God knoweth. His soule had so much acquaintance with God, that he became a stranger to his own body; his soule was so busied in re­ceiving knowledge from God, that he was faine to put off the knowledge and care of his body, wholly to God: What the state of my body was, I know not, God knoweth.

Fourthly, Some visions were presented only in bare naked words, others were cloathed in types and figures, in the shapes of beasts of the earth, and soules of the ayre, of trees, and stones, &c. As to Ezekiel, and Daniel in their Prophesies, and to John in the book of Revelations: These figures, were as an Alphabet of sacred Let­ters, which put together and spel'd, made the minde of God legi­ble to his servants.

Lastly, The Scripture in hand, hints us a fifth difference about visions. In thoughts from the visions of the night, that's considera­ble. There were visions of the day, and visions of the night; thus it is said (Dan. 2. 19.) when Daniel expounded Nebuchadnez­zars dreame, that God made it known to him in visions of the night, opposing it to visions of the day. Usually the night was the time for visions; hence (Numb. 22. 18, 19.) Balaam the false Pro­phet (when the messengers of Balack came to him) saith, Tarry this night, and I will shew you in the morning, he thought to have a vision in the night: So it is observable, that when Saul and his ser­vant, came to Samuel (1 Sam. 9. 19.) to enquire about the straid Asses, he tells him, ye shall eate bread with me to day, and to morow I will let thee goe, and will tell thee all that is in thine heart; he desi­red a night, intimating, that God used to reveale secrets unto him in the night.

So much concerning visions, with the kindes and differences of them.

From this doctrine of visions, we may take notice of our pri­viledge [Page 87] under the Gospel. The Apostle saith at sundry times and in divers manners, God spake unto our fathers by the Prophets, but he hath spoken unto us one way, which exceeds them all, Even by his Sonne who is the brightnesse of his glory, and the expresse image of his person, Heb. 1. 2, 3. We have a vision which outshines all the visions that ever the Prophets or Patriarchs had, from the be­ginning of the world. Their light was darknesse, at most but a sha­dow, their visions were obscurities, and their revelations, conceal­ments, compared with ours. Our vision is Christ, God manifested in the flesh; Mine eyes have seen thy salvation, saith old Simeon, he had a vision of Christ in person. The land of Judah was call'd the valley of vision, because God revealed himselfe to that people, more frequently and clearly, than to all the world beside. Where ever the Gospel is preached, that Land is a valley of vision, a val­ley of vision farre more lightsome and glorious, than the land of Ju­dah was; the very darknesse of the Gospel, is clearer than the light of the Law. That which was made glorious had no glory, by reason of that glory which excelleth, 1 Cor. 3. 10. Only remember, that as our priviledge is greater than theirs, so is our duty; A cleare light should be answered with a holier life. And we who have more evi­dence of what God would have done, should make more conscience to do it. Now we are not taught by dreams and visions of the night, We ought to walk as children of the day. Not onely is darknesse gone, but the shadows are fled away. The true light now shines; even he who enlightens every one that comes into the warld. We need not dreams or visions now. Why should we call for Candles when the Sunne is up? We need not Starre-light when we have day-light, or when the promised Day-starre is risen in our hearts, 2 Pet. 1. 19.

Here is one circumstance more in the Text about this vision very Sopor est som­nus profundior, somnus est plus quam do mi [...] [...]io, & sopor plus quam som­nus. [...] Significat gra­vem somnum, imo plus qu [...]m somnū profun­dum somnū & quasi lethargū [...] remarkeable; it was not only in the night, but in the night when deepe sleepe falleth on men, or on sorrowfull man, man wearied with labour and travell. This is a more distinct description of the time than the former. It was in the night, and in that part of the night, when deepe sleepe falleth on men; that is, in the former part or beginning of the night for the first sleepe is the deepe sleepe; and we use to say that a man, especially a weary hard-wrought man, is in a dead sleepe, when hee is in his first sleepe. The word signifies an extraordinary sleepe. It is used (Gen. 2. 21.) where it is said, that God caused a deepe sleepe to fall upon Adam, when he took [Page 88] out his rib and formed the woman. The Seventy translate it, extasie. [...]. Some compare it to a Lethargie; a man in a Lethargie can hard­ly be awakened. Such a sleepe as Saul was in, 1 Sam. 26. 12 when David came into the trench, and took away the Speare and the Cruse of water from his bolster. Such an one as Jonas was in, while the ship was almost sunke with the tempest, Jonah 1. 5. In both places we have this originall word. At the time when such sleepe sals on wearied man, Eliphaz had this vision. And be speaks very Tempus erat quo prima quies mor [...]alibus ae­gris. Incipi [...] & dono Divum gratis­sima se [...]p [...]t. In somnis ecce ante occulos maestissimus Hector. Visus adesse mihi. V [...]g. 20. Aeniad. elegantly, that this deepe sleepe falleth on men; because such sleepe seems to oppresse the spirits, as a heavie weight the body; it fals as heavie as Lead upon all a mans senses, and overcomes them: we say ordinarily, a man fals asleepe, and it is as true of sleep, that it fals upon a man, and fals with such a weight, that man is not able to stand under it. We say also, a men is heavie to sleep, for sleep like a heavie thing, comes down upon him, and then down comes he. Heathen Poets tell us, that at this time they had visions, or delusi­ons rather. Satan imitates God in what he can, that he may deceive with better successe.

We may abserve from hence. First, Seeing Eliphaz had this vi­sion when deep sleep falleth upon men, that the power of Gods Spirit works through all naturall impediments: when tired nature is willing to fall, or cannot stay it selfe from falling into a deep sleep, then God can awaken us, with his visions, and make us see, when we cannot hold open our eyes. When God will reveale his minde to the soule, he overcomes the imperfections of the body. Sleepinesse is an imperfection; if a man be sleepy he is unfit to hear. While the eye is thus shut, the eare cannot be open. That sleeper in the Acts fell down dead, while Paul was preaching. Yet when God comes by his mighty power and Spirit, though a mans eare be shut, he can break through, and get into his heart. The Word hath taken some napping and nodding. Yea, God breaks in by his Almighty power in the revelations of his will, not only when men are in a dead naturall sleep, but when they are in a sleep of spirituall death. The Word breaks open the barres of the grave, and loosens John 5. 25. the bands of death.

Secondly, for as much as Eliphaz had this vision when deep sleep falleth on men, himselfe being kept awake, or waking. Ob­serve, That, when we are most retired from the world, then we are most fit to have, and usually have most communion with God. If a man would but abridge himselfe of sleep, and wake, with holy [Page 89] thoughts, when deep sleep falleth upon sorrowful labouring men, he might be entertained with visions from God, though not such visions as Eliphaz and others of the Saints have had, yet visions he might have. Every time God communicates himself to the soul, there is a vision of love, or mercy, or power, somwhat of God in his nature, or in his will, is shewed unto us. David shewes us di­vine work when we goe to rest. The bed is not all for sleep; Com­mune with your owne heart upon your bed and be still, Psal. 4. Be still or quiet, and then commune with your hearts; and if you will commune with your hearts, God will come and commune with your hearts too, his Spirit will give you a loving visite, and visions of his love. When Jacob fearing the rage of his brother, had put himselfe into the best posture of defence he could, and had sent his wives, and children, his servants and his flocks over the River, the Text saith (Gen. 32. 24.) that Jacob was left alone: which is not to be understood, as if his company had left or deserted him: Ja­cobs solitarinesse was not passive, but elective. He having dispo­sed of all his family, withdrew himself, and stayed alone: and what then? then he had a vision indeed; Then there wrestled a man with him untill the breaking of the day; he spent not the night in carking and caring what should become of him the morrow: No, he retires to pray for a blessing upon his former cares, and a bles­sing he obtains. It is observable also concerning Isaac, Gen. 24. 36. that he went out into the fields to meditate (or as others read it) to pray. Some foolishly glosse upon it, that Isaac being delighted in Astronomy, went out to contemplate on the Stars. But I be­lieve the walk of Isaac's spirit was above the Stars. It is a sweet O sancta anima sola esto, ut soli omnium serves reipsam, quem ex omni­bus tibi el [...]gisti. An nescis [...]e verecunduni h [...]ere spo [...]um, &c. Bernard. expression of Bernard, If thou wouldest meet Christ in speciall communion, doe thou of tentimes retire thy selfe. Oh chast and love­ly soule, doest thou not know thou hast a modest Spouse, that will not come to thee in the throng of worldly company and employment. Come my beloved (saith the Spouse, Cant. 7. 11.) let us goe forth into the fields, and lodge in the villages. Let us get from the tumult of the Creature. He loves to find his Spouse alone, re­tired into a Chamber, or into a Closet, or in the fields and Groves, in the Gardens and shady walks, or in thoughts upon thy bed, ha­ving ihe Curtains drawn, and all the world shut out. Some have visions in the night when deep sleep falleth upon men, but what are their visions? surely they are visions of darknes, not of light, visions of Hell, rather then visions of Heaven. The Proplet com­plains [Page 90] of such, who devise evill upon their beds; they plot and contrive mischief upon their beds; or they have visions of unclean­nesse, visions of covetousnesse, visions of oppression, black infer­nall visions. How much better is it to be blind, then to have such visions? to be asleep, then have such waking thoughts? But to lye awake in our beds with thoughts of Christ, is far more sweet then the sweetest sleep. And in the day, could we make more va­cations from the world, we should have more businesse in Hea­ven. Most men are mudding in the earth all day, and if they wake in the night, earthly care keeps them awake. There are many thousands whom love unto the world keeps awake; but how few are there, whom love to Christ keeps awake?

It was an harsh, and (in one sense) an ignorant speech of a wise man amongst the Heathens, who said, There is no man who may not more holily be in any company, than with himselfe alone: And Nemo est cui non sanctius sit [...]m quolibet esse quam se­cum. Sen. yet there is a truth in it: For if a man be by himself alone, and deale only with his own heart, probably, he might be as profita­bly with any company, as with himself: One mans heart in it self, is as bad as anothers, and usually it is worst, when it is by it selfe. Some, like Nebuchadnezzar, being secluded from men, converse only with beasts, those most beastly beasts, lusts in their own bosomes. Dan. 4. 3. But, to be alone from men, to converse with God, to be alone from men, to converse with Christ, is infinitely better then all the society of men. The reason why many receive but little of Christ, little of Heaven, is, because they are so much in the croud of the Pietas pericli­tatur in nego­ [...]iis. world, so long upon the Rack of earthly care; they seldome let their hearts settle. The Ballances must stand at an even poize, be­fore you can weigh aright. If you desire to know, which beares most weight in your hearts, Earth or Heaven, Christ or the Crea­ture, let your hearts stand still. That in Psalm 4. 4. reaches this sense fully, Commune with your owne hearts upon your beds, and be still. Our hearts will not be spoken with, unlesse we be quiet. And as the Picture-drawer cannot take the features of the face, to the life; so neither can we of our hearts, or lives, unlesse we have the patience to sit for it.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 14, 15, 16.

Feare came upon me and trembling, which made all my bones to shake.

Then a Spirit passed before my face, the haire of my flesh stood up.

It stood still, but I could not discern the form thereof, an Image was before mine eyes, there was silence, and I heard a voyce, saying,

WE have already given the Logicall dependance of this whole Context, from the 12 Verse, unto the end of the Chapter, and therein shewed how Eliphaz confirmes the princi­pall Proposition (lying in the 17 Verse) by Divine Authority, a Vision received from Heaven. A thing (saith he) was se­cretly brought to me, and mine eare received a little thereof, in thoughts from visions of the night, when deep sleep falleth on men. Thus the manner of the vision is described in generall. The effects of the vision upon Eliphaz, and the particular manner how the vision appeared, are now further described and set forth. This 14 Verse contains one eminent effect of the vision, with the consequents of it; assoon (saith he) as I was in that heavenly rapture and extasie, Fear came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones to shake.

It was very usuall, for Prophets and Holy men, to be surprized with fear, at the appearance of Jehovah in his messages, by Angels or other visions. It is naturall unto man to fear, at the sight of an Angel: and it is a received opinion among the Jews, that whether God or an Angel did appear, it was present death, which they collect from divers Scriptures (Ex. 33. 20.) when Moses desired to see the face of God, the Lord answered, there is no man can see my face and live. Those words of Gideon import as much (Judg 6. 22.) When Gideon perceived that he was an Angel of the Lord, he said, Alas, O Lord God, for because I have seen an Angell of the Lord, face to face; as if he had said, alas, woe is me, I shall certainly dye: And Judg. 13. 21. Manoah concludes it, We shall surely dye, because we have seene God, when an Angel appeared to them. Hence also Jacob (Gen. 32. 30.) after his wrastling with the An­gel (which was Christ) called the name of the place Penuel, [Page 92] which is, The face of God, for saith he, I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserv'd; as noting, that it was a wonderfull privi­ledge not to dye at such a sight; the very appearance of God, is death to the Creature. And that which Hagar spake (Gen. 16 13.) may well be interpreted to this sense: when flying from her Mi­stris, God came to her in the Wildernesse, she called the name of the Lord that spake unto her, Thou God seest me; the reason is ad­ded, by way of admiration, for she said, Have I also here looked af­ter him that seeth me? Which words may well be translated, Do I live after him (sc. God) that seeth me; for here one act of life is put for the whole, looking or seeing, for living; Have I seen, or Ex Habrae [...] ita reddi potest. Etiamnè jam [...]deo s [...]u lucem han [...] espicio & vivo, post vi­dentem me. Parens. have I beheld the light, after God hath seen me; that is, Am I alive after God hath seen me. How wonderfull!

The effect of this vision upon Eliphaz, was not death. but fear, yet no ordinary fear, but fear which looked almost as pale as death; it was fear joyned with trembling, and no ordinary trem­bling, but such a fit of trembling as shook his very bones. We have often spoken of fear, both in this and in the former Chap­ters; but such a fear as met Eliphaz, we have not met with before.

That before was the grace of fear, spirituall fear, but this is the passion of fear, naturall fear. And it is naturall to man (as some of Est homini na­turale conspecto angelo etiam bono timere. Bold. ex Beda, Origen, & Chrysostome. the Ancients have observed) to fear thus at the appearance of God by Angels. Fear is caused by the apprehension of some evil im­minent or at hand, that's the definition of naturall fear. Now when God manifests himself, though the greatest good be at hand, yet the soul hath some misgivings and apprehensions of evil; & hence comes fear: the foundation of this fear is laid in guilt, sin is in the soul, and guilt may be upon the soul; thence naturall fear works, when God, who is all holy, manifests himself. And in special, there is much unbelief remaining in the heart, this fear is strengthned by unbelief, Wherefore do ye fear, saith Christ, O ye of little faith? Where there is little faith, there is much fear; and as unbelief pre­vails, so fear prevails too. Thirdly, this fear arises from the sud­dennesse and unexpectednesse of the thing. God (as you may ob­serve in all those Revelations of himself) comes suddenly: that which comes before we see it, causeth fear when we see it: sudden motions without us, work strange commotions within. And fourthly, the over-powring Majesty and super-excelling excellency of God, in any such revelation, causeth astonishments of spirit: a little appearance of God, makes the creature disappear. One drop [Page 93] of the Divine Ocean, swallowes up all man, and one ray of that Eternall Light, dazles bim. From any or all these considerations, [...] Sept. Occurrit obviam factus est mihi. it may be, that fear and trembling took hold upon Eliphaz, like an armed man, as soon as the vision appeared: fear met him (saith the Original) or (as the Septuagint) fear came out, and (as it were) stood in the way to surprize and apprehend him.

Neither was this bare fear, but fear heightned, fear accompani­ed with trembling. Trembling of the body is a symptome or sign of great fear; when fear works outwardly, manifesting it self by sad effects upon the body, then fear is in its reign and greatnesse. There are four special effects which fear works upon the body, & we have three of them here in this Text. The first is, the quaking or the shaking of the members of the body; the second is the shaking of the bones; the third is the standing up of the hair; and the fourth is the palenesse and wannesse of the countenance. All except the last appeared upon Eliphaz at the appearance of this vision.

First, he trembled in this 14 Verse, Fear came upon me and trembling: these two go often together in Scripture; you shall find trembling coupled with godly fear, as well as with naturall fear, Psal. 2. 11. Serve the Lord with fear (with reverentiall filiall fear) and rejoyce before him with trembling; that is, let your fear be an exceeding great fear, even such, as fills you with an awfull trembling at the presence of the Lord. The Apostle Paul (Phil. 2. 12.) puts them together again, Work out your salvation with fear and trembling.

The second effect is shaking of the bones, It made all my bones Quasi dicat tremor non fait supersicialis, sed vehemens & intimus, qui etiam ossa con­c [...]eret. Aquin. Gel [...]dus (que) per­ima cucur [...]it, Ossa tremor. Virg. 2. Ae­neid. to shake; as if he had said, this fear stayed not in the flesh, but de­scended, and entred into my bones. I was deeply affected with it. We translate; Which made all my bones to shake; the word in the Hebrew is, it made the multitude of my bones, or, my bones how many soever they are, to shake. The Hebrews have this rule, that the major part is usually taken for the whole, therefore the mul­tude of his bones, or many of his bones, is well translated, all his bones. And the Verb which we render shake, is of the same root with fear, fear came upon me; so that according to the letter we may read it thus, Fear came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones to fear. A bone is in it self senselesse, and therefore fearlesse; but to shew how extream and deep this fear was, he saith, it made fear enter into that, which is without fear, and hath of it self no feeling; it made my very bones to fear, as well as my [Page 94] heart to fear, or my flesh to tremble. Habakkuk in the third of his Prophesie, being before God in his prayer-visions, describes the rapture of his spirit, by this and other symptomes upon his body, When I heard, my belly trembled, my lips quivered at the voyce, rottennesse entred into my bones, v. 16.

The third effect followes; Then a spirit pass'd before my face, and the haire of my head stood up. A Spirit rush'd upon me, so the Seventy. Some translate it, A wind passd before me; a gale or breath of wind, as (1 Kings 19. 11.) when God appeared to Eli­jah, it is said, first there came a mighty wind, which rent the moun­taines, and brake the roots, and some conceive that a wind passed before Eliphaz; but the context will not bear it; those words which follow are not competible with a wind; v. 16. It stood be­fore me, it stood still, this cannot be understood of the wind, for wind is alwayes in motion: and then it is said, I had an Image before my face, now there is no form or Image of the wind; the wind hath no shape or likenesse, therefore it was a Spirit or An­gel, not an Aeriall wind. And if you say, how hath a Spirit a form or an Image, or how can that be seen? I answer it was not a Spirit abstracted and naked in it self, but a Spirit joyned with a form and shape, as is generally agreed: so Angels or Spirits did usually ap­pear to the Ancients, taking a body or some from upon them: and those apparitions, when a body was assumed, were called spi­rits. (Luke 24. 37.) it is said, that the Disciples were afraid at the appearing of Christ, thinking they had seen a spirit: The Apostles were not so absurd, as to believe, that a spirit in it self, a spirit ab­stracted, could be seen; but they call'd it a spirit, because they thought it only the representation of Christs body, and not the true body: and therefore though an outward shape appear'd, they call'd it a spirit. So here, A spirit pass'd before me, which yet might have some outward shape, in which it was clothed to the eye. [...] N [...]n significat propriè matum progressivum qualis est ani­malum, sed mo­tum levem [...] & slaxum, qualis est caelorum vel venti vel cre­scentis arboris.

A spirit passd before me,] forward, backward, up and down, which is opposed to the words in the 16 Verse, It stood still: here it was transient or in motion. The word used for passing, signifies rather such a motion as is of the Heavens, or of the winds, than that which is properly progressive or the motion of the living creatures. And thence some observe, that the motion of spirits clothed with bodies in their apparitions, is not like the motion of men, who move, lifting up their feet oue after another; but it is a passing as a ship moveth with a gale of winde, rather a gliding, [Page 95] than a going: Among the Heathen, this was made the chief difference, to distinguish a Numen, or spirit coming in any Numina veni­entia ad nos in homines & esse transfo [...]mant; Ex oculu auté [...]ari p [...]ssunt, cum [...] oblutu [...]n [...]u­eanter [...] pal­pebras nun [...]uā concladan [...]. Et magis ex inces­su, qui non ex [...]mo [...]one pe­dum ne (que) trans­positione ex­istit. Sed quo­dam impetu [...] ­e [...]o & vi ex­pedita, sinden­tium magis au­ras quam tran­seuntiam. Quā ­obrem statuas quo (que) Deorum Egyptij po­nunt, conjun­gentes illis pe­des & quasi unientes He­lioder in Ae­th [...]op [...]cis. l. 3. Pedes vestis defluxit ad imos. Et vero incess [...] pa [...]u [...] Dea. Vi [...]g. l. 1. Ae­niad. de Ve­nere. shape, from a naturall body. The steddinesse of their eyes was one, the not transposing their feet was another, and a clearer evidence.

This Spirit passing thus before him, produces the third effect.

The haire of my head stood up] Shaking of the bones went be­fore, and now standing up of the haire. A spirit pass'd before me, and the haire of my head stood up. The Originall is, The haire of my flesh, or the haire of my body; flesh is put for the body, as in Gen. 2. 24. They two shall be one flesh. That is (as it were) one bo­dy, speaking of man and wife; and Psal. 119. 120. My flesh trem­bleth for fear of thee, saith David, it is the same word; as if Eli­phaz had said, I am so much affected with thoughts of God, that the very hair of my flesh (as in extraordinary fear it useth to do) stood up. The naturall reason why the haire stands up in time of fear is this; when suddain fear falleth upon us, the blood goes, or [...]astens rather to the heart, and so the outward members wax cold; and the skin, in which the haire is rooted, is prest more to­gether, which causeth the haire to stand up, though of it selfe it be a weak and unstable excrement.

So we see the generall effect of the vision, which was fear, and those three concomitants or symptomes of fear, The trembling of his flesh, The shaking of his bones, And the standing up of the haire of his flesh. From all, take these Observations.

First, Forasmuch as Eliphaz falleth into such a fit of fear and amazement, at this manifestation of God to him, we learn, That man is not able to bear the presence of God. Weak and fraile man, falls before the greatnesse, power and majesty of God. Dust and ashes crumbleth away, if the glory of the great God doe but shine forth, even in those lesser manifestations of himself. Hence it was, that Job seems to capitulate with God, that he would speak with him, upon two Articles or conditions granted, Chap. 13. 21, 22 First, Withdraw thy hand far from me. Secondly, Let not thy dread make me afraid: Then call thou, and I will an­swer; or let me speake, and answer thou me. As if he had said, so dreadfull is thy presence, that unlesse thou be pleased to sweeten it to me, fear will presently seize upon me, and disable me to speak. Moses who was a favourite of heaven, and one who shortly after had communion with God, above all that ever lived: yet when [Page 96] Jehovah appeared in that flaming Bush, the text saith, Exod. 3. 6. That Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to looke upen God; holy Moses could not bear that glory. Daniel a man greatly beloved of God, and honoured with glorious visions, was yet greatly asto­nished at those visions, Chap. 10. 8. There remained no strength in me, for my comelinesse was turned into corruption, and I retained no strength: and vers. 16. O my lord, by the vision my sorrowes are turned upon me, and I have retained no strength: Vers. 17. Neither is there any breath left in me. I am ready to dye, I am not able to bear thy majesty, in these mysteries of thy will, made known to me. How doth Habakkuk cry out in the place afore quoted, of his trembling belly, quivering lips, and of rottennesse entring into his bones We find in the New Testament, the Saints swallowed up with the like amazements. Zechariah of whom the Holy Ghost had given such an excellent testimony a little before, for a man that had walked blamelesse in all the Ordinances of God, yet as soon as the Angel appeared, the Text saith, He was [...]u­bled, and fear fell upon him, Luke 1. 12. Yea the blessed Virgin (v. 29. of that Chap.) when she saw him (that is the Angel) she was troubled in her mind. Lastly, John the beloved Disciple, seeing Christ walking in the midst of the seven golden Candlesticks, &c. Fell at his feet as dead, Rev. 1. 17.

How should this humble and abase us in our selves! we that are not able to stand before the gracious manifestations of God, when he comes to reveale himself to us in mercy, how shall we be able to stand before the wrathfull manifestations of God? The Apostle tells us (1 Cor. 15. 50.) Flesh and blood cannot enter into the Kingdome of Heaven; by flesh and blood, we are not to understand, the sinfull nature of man (as flesh and blood often signifie in Scripture, being opposed to spirit) but the constitution of nature or that estate wherein we stand, as men; this flesh and blood is not able to enter into the Kingdome of Heaven, that is, it cannot bear the majesty, glory and excellency of Heaven, where God clearly manifests himself unto his Saints; and where we shall see God face to face; and therefore the Apostle argueth all along, as by divers other Arguments, so by this; to prove the necessity of a resurrection, a raising and a new moulding of the body, into a spirituall condition: Why, because our naturall bodies are not able to stand under such a weight of glory, as is prepared for the Saints in that Kingdome: Corruption (nature subject to cor­ruption) [Page 97] cannot inherit incorruption; hence it was, that when but a little of God broke forth, the holiest and best of men in the world, fell a shaking and trembling, as not being able to beare, that transcendent majesty, shiningout in those weaker refracted beames of glory.

Secondly, Seeing God comming at this time to instruct Eli­phaz, and reveale a great truth to him, was pleased to deale thus with him, to make him shake and tremble, we may note, That God usually humbles a man, and layes him very low, before he exalts him in the manifestations of his truth or power. Humilia­tions prepare and posture the heart for revelations. The reason is, because God delights to have a man humbled, before he be in­structed. Paul (though as humble a soule as lived) was in dan­ger to be exalted above measure, through the aboundance of re­velations, (2 Gor 12.) Even divine knowledge (through our cor­ruption) is apt to puffe up, and therefore we had need to have the bladder prickt, and our spirits laid flat, for the receiving of know ledge: Onely humble ones are fit to be Gods schollars; he will teach none else, he resisteth a proud man, then surely he will never teach a proud man; The mee [...]e will he teach his way; Ye breakes Psal. 25. 9. our will, before he trusts us with the secrets of his will: When the spirits of men lie in the [...]ust, when they tremble and shake, when all their bones are afraid, and rottennesse enters into them, then they are prepared vessels, to receive and take in the dew and in­fluences of divine revelation. When [...]od made that most memo­rable manifestation of himselfe, to the ancient Church, in giving the Law; we reade how he terrified them, how he humbled and abased them: How dreadfull was the preparation to the giving of the Law? The Apostle describes it, (Heb. 12. 18, 20, 21.) by blacknesse, and darknesse, and tempest, so that they could not en­dure that which was commanded; and so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly feare and quake; I confesse the Law in it selfe, was a terrible, a killing letter, and that, which might well make the world shake, and men to tremble: If (as Lu­ther saith) but one precept or sentence of the Law should be left in its full power and strength (mans sinne) it would destroy man­kinde, and make all the world (because guilty) tremble and fall before it; yet it was not barely the matter of the Law revealed, which caused this trembling: that was written in the heart o [...] man before, and was now published to the Jewes, with gracious with [Page 98] Gospell intentions; but it was the manner and circumstances wherein the Law was revealed, which were so terrible. And this terror had this great use, even the humbling of their soules to a willing subjection and obedience to the will of God. When God revealed the Gospell to Paul (as well as when he revealed the Law to Moses,) he made Paul tremble (Act. 9.) Paul was smit­ten down to the ground, God layed him along, unhors'd him, when he came to manifest his Christ to, or (as himselfe speaks, (Gal. 1. 16.) to reveale his Son in him: And this was to abase him, to breake his heart, that he might be made up a chosen vessel, to carry the Name of God unto the Gentiles. And howsoever such Acts 9. 15. humiliations are not of absolute necessity, yet they have been very usuall, and very usefull. When the Lord hath layd the will and wisdome of man in the dust, when he hath made the stron­gest and stoutest to become as a childe or a babe, to quake before him; then he takes him into his Schoole of Instruction, and shewes him such things, as none of the wise men, or Princes of this world ever knew, even such things, as eye hath not seen, eare hath not heard, neither have they entred into the heart of man. This made our Lord Jesus break out into that mixt rapture of gratulation and admiration, Mat. 11. 25. I thanke thee, O Father, Lord of Heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and pru­dent, and hast revealed them to babes. Be as babes before God, and he will give you the wisedome of men, yea of Angels. They who are high built, and p [...]acl'd in their own conceits, seldome have the foundation or first principles of saving knowledge laid in them savingly.

Thirdly, From this effect of the vision, observe, That feare, is a strong and powerfull passion. Feare comes upon a man like a Giant, Feare (saith Eliphaz) came upon me, it came upon me violently. A man were as good meete a beare rob'd of her whelps, as this feare: The strongest man in the world, cannot shake your bones, as feare alone will, if that take hold of you. Some of the Greeks, had such amazing thoughts of Feare, it was so terrible to them, that to appease it, they worshipped it for a god, as some wor­shipped sorrow among the Romanes for a goddesse, under the name of Dea Angerona. The true God is called feare in Scripture: And Aug de Civ. Dei. l. 5. c. 8. feare was made an Idol God among the Heathens: And if we consider these effects in the Text, trembling of the flesh, shaking of the bones, standing up of the haire, all which this suddaine surprise [Page 99] of feare wrought upon Eliphaz, we must needs acknowledge and conclude it to be, a very potent passion. In the first of Proverbs, the Lord threatens those who would not feare him, thus, I will Prov. 1. 27. laugh when your feare commeth: Then he shewes the manner how such feare commeth, When your feare commeth as desolation. We cannot well take feare in this place, for the object of feare, for that is desolation it selfe, and therefore cannot be said, to come as desolation. Then, taking it properly, for the passion of fear: We see, that the feare of trouble, is like the trouble we feare. Feare is even as bad as desolation; Feare puls all downe within, and makes a man like a desolate place, before his place is made desolate. And therefore in these times, we had need take care, that we put not strength to our feares. These are fearing times, we should pray much, that the power of naturall feare may be subdued, especially that our naturall feare, may be turned into godly feare; godly feare, is the proper cure of naturall feare: Sanctifie the Lord God in your hearts, and make him your feare, or else the feare of man will quickly Lord it over your hearts. Such a feare, is more dan­gerous, then all our dangers: Our enemies shall need no weapons to fight against us, with, but our own feares. Trembling joints, and shaking bones, will make small resistance; and while naturall feare is strong, naturall strength is, but weake or uselesse; When from the onset or assault of this feare, a mans haire stands, himselfe will run.

Fourthly, Consider this by way of consequence, That if a time when God commeth to reveale his will to man, be so dreadfull, what will that time be (and that time is comming) when God commeth to reckon with man, for the disobeying of that will? Here a truth was but shewed Eliphaz, in an extraordinary man­ner, and behold him shaking, fearing, trembling; Now when God shall come to require an account of man, for resisting or imprison­ing the truth; when he shall come (2 Thes. 1. 8.) to take vengeance on all those that have not obeyed the Gospell of truth, what terror, fear and trembling will fall upon the stoutest of sinfull men? There must be an appearing of all, but there can be no standing for such, before the dreadfull throne of Christ: The ungodly (of vvhat sort of size soever) shall not stand in judgement, Psal. 1. 5. im­penitent unbeleevers, shall not be able to hold up their heads in that day. Captaines and mighty men, who have often conversed vvith dangers, and knew not what it was to be afraid; Men [Page 100] who (like the Horse, described, Job 39. 22.) used to mock at feare, and would not turne backe for drawne swords, or the glittering of shield or speare, shall at that day shake with feare, and hide them­selves like little children. So much for the effects of the vision. Now follows a further description of the vision.

Verse 16. It stood still, but I could not discerne the forme thereof, an image was before mine eyes, there was silence, and I heard a voice, saying.

This verse containeth a second gesture of this spirits appearing in the vision to Eliphaz. The spirit was passing before, here standing, as if he would present himselfe more fully to his view and observation. It stood still, an image was before mine eyes; but though the spirit gave Eliphaz this faire advantage, yet he made little use of it, for he saith, I could not discerne the forme of it, that is, I could make nothing of it directly; But when his eye gave him no helpe, his eare did: though he could not discerne or distinguish the forme of the spirit appearing, yet he could di­stinguish the voice of the spirit speaking, there was silence, and I heard a voice saying.

It stood still.] To stand, in Scripture, imports not alwayes a setled posture of the body: but it is taken sometime in a larger sense, to note our presence in any place, whether it be sitting, standing or walking, as Mat. 16. 28. Christ saith, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Sonne of man comming in his Kingdome. Yet here the posture is conceived to be, an erect, setled, fixed posture; to the intent, Eliphaz might have his eye more setled and fixed upon it, and likewise that his heart might be better prepared and fitted, for the receiving of that message, which should be delivered unto him by it; when a man speakes, he usually makes a stand; An ambu­latory speech, a speech in motion, is not so audible, nor so comely. In apparitions, this posture is frequently mentioned. When our Lord appeared to the Disciples after the resurrection, Luke saith, He stood amengst them, cap. 24. 36. Zacharie, saw the Angel standing on the right side of the Altar, Luk. 1. 11. And while the Apostles were looking up stedfastly to Heaven, at the ascention of Christ, Behold two men stood by them in white apparel, which al­so said, &c. Acts 1. 10. therefore also this spirit being to speake, stood still.

I could not discerne the forme of it. The face of it, so some reade, [...]. The countenance or aspect of it, so others. They who rise from the dead, are not easily known by those, who knew them living. When Christ arise (John 20.) it is said that Mary, who was very well acquainted with him in his life (though he stood by her) knew not that it was Jesus, but thought it had been the Gardner. When Christ walked with the Disciples to Emaus, they knew him not, and there a reason is given, their eyes were held that they should not know him; a speciall act of Gods providence suspended their eye-sight, and took away (though not the power of seeing, yet) the power of discerning. God hath every sense so exactly in his own hand, that he can let it out, or call it back in any degree as himselfe pleaseth; he can give a man so much power, as to see ano­ther, and not so much power as to discern him; which (by the way) is an argument of the wonderfull exactnesse of Gods providence over us, he holds our senses in his hand, [...] [...]ell as our reason or our wils▪ and saith, thus farre you shall [...] heare, and no fur­ther; therefore it is said, Verse 31. that their eyes were opened: they were opened before to see him, but now they were opened to know him. And at other times when Christ appeared after his re­surrection, his Disciples were at a stand, whether it was he or no: Thomas, though he saw Christ before him, yet he would not be­lieve it was he, untill he had put his finger into the hole of the Nayls, and into the hole which the Speare made in his side: untill he had assurance from another sense, he would not believe his eyes. Ethnicis semper absurdum fuit, ut faciem deo­rū agnoscerent h [...]mines quam deo [...] [...] poste [...]io [...]es poe­ [...]ae ab Homero, Homerus ab Egyptiis vel po­ [...]ius ex sacris s [...]n [...]ti Moysis l [...]bris sumpsit. B [...]ld. [...] Sign [...]ficat spe­ciem vel sensi­bilem vel men­talem. If then a body arising from the grave, though it be seen, yet can hardly be distinguished by mortall eyes; how much lesse is the eye of man able to discern Angels or Spirits, cloathed in humane forms. The impressions of glory and immortality, which appeare upon bodies assumed by spirits, especially in sudden apparitions, doe ex­ceedingly master, if not astonish sense. The Heathens thought it absurd to say, that their Gods could be known by face: For though they were so grosse, as to satisfie rhemselves with bodily Gods, yet they believed those bodies were so refined, had such a kinde of ma­jestick Divinity stampt upon them, that a meer mortall could not comprehend them. Their doctrine shines a little into this Text. A spirit passed before Eliphaz, he had a sight of it, for it stood still, yet he could not make out what it was, or who it was, he could not discerne the form thereof.

An Image was before mine eyes.] The word Themounah, which [Page 102] we translate Image, is taken either for a visible or intellectuall Image. Sometime it is taken for the form of a thing, which is ap­prehended visibly by the eye; so in Deut. 4. 15, 16. Take ye there­fore good heed to your selves (for ye saw no manner of similitude, in the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb, out of the middest of the fire) lest ye corrupt your selves, and make the similitude of any figure, that is, least you make a visible Image of the invisible God.

Secondly, the same word signifies an Image in the minde. Thus God himselfe who said in Deuteronomy, that they saw no similitude, and thereupon bad them take heed of making any similitude, saith of Moses, that the similitude of the Lord he shall behold, Num. 21. 8. The word similitude in Numbers is the same for Image in the Text, an intellectuall image, a representation to the understanding. Moses had this priviledge, The similitude of God revealed to his Spectrū & vi­sū vocant lati­ni quicquid cor­pore apparet forma licet cor­pus non sit. understanding; but [...] he saith in Deut: ye had no similitude, the meaning is, no [...] [...]all, no visible similitude, no object of sense. This Image in the [...]ext was not intellectuall, for it was be­fore his eyes. Nor was it the Image of a spirit gross▪d into a body, but it was a spirit in or with the imaginary form of a body.

There was silence, and I heard a voice, saying.] That is the last thing which the Text holds forth about this vision.

There was silence.] The Hebrew thus, Silence, and I heard a [...] Silentium & vocem, per hyp­pallagen, vocem silentii, id est, vocem tacitam & submissam audiebam. Mercer. Et vocem quasi curae levis au­divi. Vulg. [...]. Sept. Silens murmur. Ar. Mont. voice, we supply, there was. The readings are various, yet the sense one. I heard the voice, as it were, of a gentle gale, I heard a gale and a voice, I heard a silent murmure. Our Translators put in the margine, I heard a still voice, which comes near to that, I heard a silent voice (by a usuall figure) silence and a voice, for a voice of silence. If any should say, these two are so opposite, that they can­not be predicated or affirmed one of another. Silence is the direct contrary to a voice, therfore to say, there was a silent voice, seemeth to be a contradiction in the adjunct. I answer it is frequent to affirm contraries one of another, in an inferiour & remisse degree. Though we cannot say light is darke, yet we may say, this is a dark light; that is, a glimmering, imperfect, obscure light, (Zech. 14. 6.) The day shall be neither clear nor dark, it shall be, as it were, a dark light. So a low voice, may well be called a silent voice; I heard a silent voice, that is▪ I heard a low or a still voice speaking to me. Thus it suits well with what he said, at the 12 Verse; Now a thing was secretly brought unto me. And we may further clear it by that [Page 103] 1 Kings 19. 12. where the expression is of the same importance; [...] Vox sabtilis silentii dulce susurrum, vox sine sono. here we have silence and a voice, there, after the noise of a great winde and of an Earthquake, it is said that Elijah heard (as some render it) the voice of a subtile, fine, slender, attenuated silence, or as we translate, a still small voice, a sweet ravishing whisper, a voice without a sound. Hence we have a kinde of musick, which in our common language we call still musick.

A twofold reason may be given why the Lord spake (as it were) in silence. First, that the secret manner of speaking might be an Ar­gument that the matter spoken was a secret, a mystery, not common or ordinary. Secondly, to dispose the hearer to receive it with more care, reverence, and attention. A man must set himselfe to heare with diligence, while another speaks with silence. A loud voice findes us out, comes to us: but we must come to a low voice, and finde that out. When the Speaker takes least pains with his tongue, the hearer must take most pains with his eare.

And this manner of speaking, was used by the ancient Heathen in their mysterious Oracles and Revelations. As when God re­vealed a secret, he spake secretly, and as it were whispered those truths in the eare; whispering is speaking within one degree of silence) so the Devill (who imitates God in what he can, that he may draw credit unto his own deceivings) is described in his in­struments to speak thus. Isa. 8. 19. When they shall say unto you, seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto Wizards, that peep and that mutter; they speak as it were silently, they onely whisper their diabolicall incantations, and lying impostures. And (Isa. 29.) Thou shalt be brought down and shalt speak out of the ground, and thy speech shall be low out of the dust, and thy voice shall be as of one that hath a familiar Spirit out of the ground, and thy speech shall whisper out of the dust. The Prophet in this alludes to the manner of Witches and Inchanters, who had familiar Spi­rits, which he here applyes in a threat unto the people: the time shall come that you shall be brought down by your enemies, that you shall speak out of the ground, you shall lye at their feet like poore captives, that cry submissively and pitifully for quarter, O mercy, mercy, spare my life; that's the thing aimed at by the Pro­phet, that God would abase them so, before their enemies, that they should whisper out of the ground to their enemies for pity, as a Witch whispers from the ground to her miserable Clients who come for counsel. Tertullian in his Apologetick describes the heathen Ma­gitians [Page 104] thus, they speak belohing and gasping, humming and hawing, rather then speaking. The old Poet cals this Poppisme, by which —sortes ducent, frontem (que) ma numque Praebebit vati crebrum pop­pisma petenti. Juvenal. Aurusp [...]es de circo ex or [...]s pressi sono, quod poppisma dicitur fu [...]u a col­ligebant. [...] word he shews, how their Idol Prophets, answered the deluded people, their miserable Clients, when they came for counsell. To which the Hebrew word T [...]sipht saph used by Isaiah in the eighth Chapter before cited, is very like both in sound and sense.

There yet another interpretation of these words more proper, and answerable to our translation. There was silence and I heard a voice, saying,] This referres the silence to Eliphaz, as a prepara­tion to his hearing the voice; there was silence▪ that is, I stood still and spake never a word, but waited to heare what should be spoken, I was silent, and all things about me w [...]re husht and silent too: Then I heard a voice; and so Junius g [...]osses, Being (saith he) compos'd and strengthned a little after my former fear, I attended Me [...]ontineba [...] tacitus expe­ctans revelatio­nem. silently to the Spirit, that I might hear what should be spoken un­to me.

We reade, Rev. 8. 1. that there was silence in Heaven for halfe an houre; and Verse 5, we reade of voices and thunderings; before those great voices there was great silence: usually before great spea­king there is great silence; I was silent, and all were husht, then I heard a voice: silence prepares for audience. In Congregations before the Preacher begins, all hold their peace; In Courts of ju­stice when the Judge is to speak, the Crier cals for silence: It was a usuall word amongst the rites of the Heathen, Favour your tongues, or spare your speech, when the mysteries of their superstition were Favete linguis. revealed: we may take the present Text in this sense: that Eli­phaz set himselfe in a silent posture to attend the message which was to be revealed unto him. There was silence and I heard a voice, saying.

If we take the former interpretation, then, for as much as Eli­phaz after those terrours and tremblings, the shaking of his bones, and standing up of his haire, the confused form of a spirit, and an amazing Image before his eyes: for as much (I say) as after all these, he hears a still silent voice. We may observe,

That God after terrours usually sends in comfort and re­freshings. God having terrified Elijah by a mighty rushing winde (in the vision before noted) by an Earthquake which brake the Rocks, and by a fire: then comes (as here in the Text) a still small voice, a voice of silence, and God was in that voice. It is put as a principall distinction amongst the Ancients, to [Page 105] know, whether a revelation were from a good Angel or from a bad Angel. When a revelation was made by a good Angel, though he fill'd the heart with fear, at the beginning of his speech, yet he gave comfort in the end, and closed with in consolation. We may observe in those revelations such heartning, chearing language as this, Be not afraid, be of good chear; so to Daniel, so to John, so to Zechariah, so to Mary, so to Gideon. But when a revelation was made by an evill Angel, or by a Witch, as it filled the hearers with feare, so it left them full of feare, it wounded them with terrours, and it applyed no cure, no playster, nothing medicinable to heale those terrours. We finde, indeed, (1 Sam. 28) that when Saul con­sulted with the Witch of Endor, as soon as the Spirit appeared, it is said, that the Witch her selfe was afraid, and there is no mention made of Sauls being afraid, at the first; so that Saul fals a com­forting the Witch, and said to her, be not afraid: She was afraid, not of the Spirit that appeared, but of Saul, because he had made a law against Witches; and hence Saul comforts her, in assurance of impunity, notwithstanding that sinne, both against the law of God, and his own. But you shall finde in how sad a condition Saul himselfe was, before the Devill had done with him; for, as soon as Saul heard the tydings delivered by that personated Samuel, he fell into a shaking fit, and was as one astonished and dead: hanging upon the rack of these torments, the Devill left him; there was no word of comfort, no sweet still musicall voice to revive and fetch him againe, but away packs the wicked Spirit, and leaves him over­whelm'd with sorrow. And then (instead of a better, surely he could not have a worse) the poor Witch comes to comfort and counsell him. They who refuse counsell from the Prophets of God may at last be forced to receive all their comfort from a Witch, a Pro­phet or Prophetesse of the Devill. But to the point in hand, we see when the Devill and wicked Angels speake terrour, they leave ter­rour: Whereas if God, by good Angels speaks terrour, or affrights his people with the tokens of his presence, he with a sweet and still voice refreshes and comforts them, before he departs.

And we may in that generall apply it to our selves. That when God astonishes and terrifies us, when he makes our bones to shake, and rottennesse to enter into them, wee may expect comfort and refreshing are at hand; and we may build upon it, that the more we tremble, the more we shall be refreshed; Habakkuk in the place before cited, is expresse in this faith, I trembled, that I [Page 106] might have rest in the day of trouble; to which he addes, when he commeth up to the people (he will invade or cut them to pieces) with his troopes. As intimating, that they who will not tremble, shall be made to tremble; but when we actively labour to make our hearts tremble, or when God makes us tremble in such a way as this, we may build upon it, that, we shall rest in the day of trou­ble, at least we shall rest in the end of that day: God never leaves his people under a Cloud: he takes off trouble, and brings in a suc­cession of comfort, or conquers the trouble by mingling a prevai­ling portion of comfort with it.

If we take the Text in the latter sense, we may note, That si­lence becomes man when God speaks. Speak Lord (saith Samuel) for thy servant heareth. Heare O servant, for thy Lord speaketh.

Silence prepares the heart to learne: Pythagoras commanded his Scholers to keep silence five yeares. And the Papists impose si­lence, as a part of discipline upon their Novices. Let superstition be avoided, and then Silence is fittest for learners, unlesse their voyce be an enquiry after learning. That which the Apostle speaks respecting women in the Church, is true of all in the sense I now speak of, 1 Tim. 2. 12. Let the woman learn in silence, so let the man learn in silence. There were many among us, not long since, who made many teachers silent. Silence is good as it is a preparative to learning, but woe to that, which is a hinderance to instructing. They enjoyned silence on Teachers, by which knowledge was sup­pressed: we advice silence upon learners, that knowledge may be encreased.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 17.‘Shall mortall man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his Maker?’

IN this verse we have the argument it selfe, or the matter revea­led in the former vision; There was silence, and I heard a voyce saying: What that voice said, we have in these words; Shall mor­tall man be more just than God? This is the theame or subject, up­on which Eliphas argues; and it is the maine proposition of the whole context. The proofe of this proposition, was given from [Page 107] Divine authority, in the fore-going words; and we have a proofe Numquid homo Dei comparati­one justificabi­tur. Vulg. [...] Sept. Clamabat & dicebat fierme potest ut homo quam Deus [...]u­rior sit. Chald. [...] Miser aerumnis & peccatis ob­noxius. [...] quasi [...] in quo sensus despe randi Eusebius à [...] dedu­cit, quod [...]blivis­ci significat & [...] in­terpreta [...]ur, qua­si animal obli­viosum dicas. Drus. [...] Min est compa­randi particu­la: comparatio exprimitur per praepositienem ultimi casus, justificatus ab illo ie prae illo. Luk. 18. 14. [...] Vir, quasi vali­dus, ut & lati­ne à viribus dictus. from reason, in the following part of this Chapter.

Shall mortall man be more just than God? or, Shall man be justi­fied in comparison of God? or, Shall man be just before God? The Chaldee Paraphrase is yet more quick: The Spirit cryed out and said, Can it possibly be, that man should be more pure than God?

The words are propounded by way of question, we may resolve them into this negative proposition, Mortall man is not more just than God, man is not more pure than his Maker.

We translate Mortall man, the Hebrew is but one word, yet in the propriety of that language, it contains both, noting man with an addition (such as it is) of weaknesse and frailty, the meanest and lowest estate of man: Enosh, a poor, sick, weak, dying creature, a creature of so little hope, that some derive this name in the He­brew, from desperation; a creature so unworthy to be remem­bred by God, or so ready to forget God, that others derive it from a word, which signifies forgetfulnesse, or to forget.

Shall man, this mortall man, this weake creature, be more just, or be justified rather than God? Such a sense the words carry. When man and God are compared together, shall God be estee­med lesse just, or lesse pure than man? (Luk. 18. 14.) it is said of the Publican, that he went downe justified, rather than the other; put the Pharisee and the Publican in the ballance together, and the Publican was the weightier in righteousnesse, or the more just of the two: That in Luke, is an Hebraisme, and it is the same with this. Put weak man and the mighty God (the word Eloha, which is here used for God, noteth the strong God, or the mighty God) put him in the ballance of consideration with weake man, will he not be infinitely more weighty in justice, more shining in purity, more glorious in holinesse?

Yea, not only if you take man in his obscurest notion, or in this terme of extenuation, Enosh, for a weake man, a poore creepled creeping creature; but take him in his best estate, as he is (Geber) a strong man, a powerfull man, a holy man: yet as it followes in the text, shall man be more pure than his Maker? that is, shall such a mighty man, a wise man, a learned man, a gracious man, a man accomplished in all naturall, in all acquired endowments, the chiefest and choisest, the creame and flower of all the men upon the face of the earth; A Worthy of the first three, the First of all the Worthies; A man of the first magnitude, of the highest eleva­tion, [Page 108] both in parts, gifts and graces, shall he be more pure than his Maker? Christ (as incarnate or made man) is called, the Migh­ty God, (Isa. 9. 6.) God made a Mighty man, or man becomming the Mighty God. The Chaldee calls all Giants, Gibbaraja; and Nimrod the first of the Giants, was called by this name, a Migh­ty hunter before the Lord, Gen. 10. 8. So then, Let man be never so excellent, his excellency is basenesse; let him be never so strong, so wise, so holy, he is but weake, foolish, filthy, compared with him who made him. Leave your Enosh, your weakeling, your poore sick creatures: bring forth your Gibers, your best, they are as no­thing, yea lesse than nothing before the Lord. Shall mortall man be more just than God? shall man (the best of men) be more pure than his Maker?

We are to marke the double opposition of the Text. Here is first, mortall, weake, sick man, set in opposition to the strong, the mighty, the all-powerfull God. And then in the second place, the opposition is between the strongest, the best, the holiest, the wisest of men, and the maker of all men. Shall mortall man, or shall the best of men be more just, more pure than God their Maker? There is a three-fold sense, which we may give of the words joyntly.

First, They are a deniall of all comparison between God and man. No man may compare himselfe with God. Shall mortall man? that is, mortall man ought not to be so bold, and daring as to ven­ture upon such a thing as this, to stand upon termes of equality with the mighty, the great, the glorious God, the Maker of all, as the Apostle resolves in his own case, (1 Cor. 4. 4.) Though I know nothing by my selfe, yet am I not hereby justified at all, much lesse though a man know nothing by himselfe, will this justifie him in this comparison, that he is just, as God is just.

But secondly, Shall mortall man be more just than God? It is as if he had said, God who is infinite in justice, would never doe that which a just man will not doe; God who is infinite in power, would never doe that, which a weake man would not doe, shall weake man be more just than God? And so we may forme the argu­ment thus;

No man, no Judge, is more just or incorrupt than God, who is the supreame and Lord chiefe Justice of all men. But there is no just Judge amongst men, who will punish an innocent man: there­fore God doth not punish any one that is innocent. The conse­quence [Page 109] or inference is plaine and cleare, for God himselfe should either be unjust, or he should be lesse just, than man is, if he should doe that, which a just man upon true grounds would refuse to doe. Therefore in Gen. 18. Abraham pleades with God, under that title of a just Judge, shall not the Judge of all the world doe right? As if he should say, faithfull Judges upon the earth, will doe right, there­fore surely he that is the Judge of all the earth will doe right; so Eliphaz here to Job, Never complaine as if God had done thee wrong, for certainly, the just God will not doe that which a just man would not doe: The word, whereby God is exprest (Eloha) Eloha denotot judicem, & [...] ­quissimum re­rum arbit [...]um. doth well comply with, and answer this sense, it being properly at­tributed to God as a Judge, the great arbitrator and determiner, of all the causes and cases of all men in the world. Shall mortall man be more just than God?

Thirdly, The sense may be taken thus, If any man should come to impleade God, or to pleade with God, if any should dare to tax the Justice of God, or be so hardy to put in a bill of complaint a­gainst him; shall this man, this weake man be found more just in his complaining, than God hath been in sentencing? shall his bill of complaint be better grounded, than the Lords award of Judgement? It is an allusion to those, who supposing they have wrong, com­plaine against the Judge, and say, that he hath erred in or perver­ted Judgement; That word (Justified) here used, shall man be ju­stified before God? is a Judiciarie word, a Court or Law terme; [...] Ve [...]bum forense spectans ad in­nocentis abso­lutionem. The same word, which the Holy Ghost uses, in that great work of Free Grace, the justification of a sinner before God; And that im­ports the declaring and setting forth of a man, to be righteous, and his cause good in Jesus Christ, whereupon he is cleered and ac­quitted. When Satan accuses or pleads against us, laying such and such sinnes to our charge; thus and thus this man hath offended, then God is said to justifie a man, that is, to declare him to be just, his sinnes being covered, and himselfe accepted in Jesus Christ. Hence that divine challenge to all accusers. Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect, it is God that justifieth, Rom. 8. 33.

So now, if man should accuse and complaine against God, he hath done thus and thus in the world, afflicted a Job, troubled a righteous person; shall mortall man be more just than God? Shall this man in his complaint be justified? shall not God rather be justified a­gainst whom he complains? Certainly he shall. God shall be de­clared just, yea, he shall be declared just by man. A man un-ingaged [Page 110] and rightly principled, Such a man shall say, verily there is a God that judgeth the earth. In the judgement of man, that judgment shall speak a God; and all shall be forced to Daniels mourning acknow­ledgement, O Lord righteousnesse belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of face. Dan. 97. 9 We may enlighten it further by that of David (Ps. 51. 4.) where he professes thus, I will confesse my sins, &c. that thou maiest be justified when thou speakest, and be cleare when thou judgest: as if he should say, if hereafter thou shalt af­flict me, and lay thy rod upon me, I know many will be ready to complaine and say, why doth God thus, why doth he afflict Da­vid, David a holy man, a man after his own heart: a man of whom he hath given such large testimony, of whom he hath said, I have found a man after my own heart. Now to the intent all these may be cast in their suits, and answered in their complainings, I here ac­knowledge before all the world, that I have sinned greatly; & there­fore, though thou hast pardoned my sinne, and so wilt never charge it upon me to condemnation, nor punish me for it in a way of sa­tisfaction; yet hereafter thou maiest in thy fatherly wisdome, see it needfull to chastise me, to prevent and purge out sin, or to help me against the weaknesse of my nature, and the strength of temptation for the time to come. So here in the Text, Shall man be justified before God? If Job or any of his friends for him, should complaine against God, why he being one commended and approved from the mouth of God, for a man perfect and upright, should be thus af­flicted; what? Shall weake Job be justified before God? Yea, though Job be considered in his greenest flourishings of grace, and highest pitch of his prosperity, as he was Geber indeed, the grea­test, the mightiest man in the Easterne world; yet shall he be more pure than his Maker? No, cease your complainings, God is just, and his honour must be vindicated, in what he doth, or in what he shall doe against the weakest, or against the mightiest, against the meanest or against the best of men. God will be found just, and man a lyar.

Either of these three senses are faire from the construction of the Text, and may be profitable for us; I shall therefore draw them down into five or six conclusions, which will be at least a portion of that marrow and fatnesse which this Scripture yeilds us to feed upon.

First, we may observe, That man naturally preferreth himselfe [Page 111] not onely above other men, but even before God himselfe. A prin­ciple of pride dwels in our hearts by nature, which at some times, and in some cases breeds better thoughts in us of our selves, than of God himselfe. And it is this height of spirit, which the heavenly vi­sion here would levell to the ground. We know it was the first sin of man, that man desired to be like God Gen. 3. The first tempta­tion was baited with a parity to the Divine powers, Ye shall be as Gods knowing good and evill. This also was the language of Luci­fers heart; Thou hast said in thy heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the starres of God, I will ascend a­bove the heights of the Clouds, I will be like the most high, I say [...]4. 13, 14. And the practise of the man of sinne, is thus prophesied That he shall exalt himselfe, above all that is called God, 2 Thess. 2. 4. But the heart of man is yet more mad, and hath out-growne those sinfull principles. For in troubles and temptations, when things go not according to his minde, he sometimes hath thoughts not only that he is like God: but that he is more just than God, and if he had the ordering of things, he would order them better than God: he sometime thinks himselfe juster than God, and if he had the punishing of offenders, justice should proceed more freely and impartially than it doth: which is upon the matter, not onely to exalt himself (as the Man of Sin doth) above Nuncupative Gods, or all that is called God, but to exalt himself above him who is God by nature, above the onely one-most God. Even to speak in this Dia­lect of highest blasphemy, that he is more just than God, more pure than his Maker.

Secondly, Take this conclusion, That it is a most high presumpti­on, not onely for low weak man, but for the best, the highest of men, to compare themselves with God, or to have any thoughts concerning his wayes, as if they could mend them. When God cals us to amend our wayes, for us to presume we could amend Gods wayes, is the very top branch, the highest tower, yea, the most towring Pinnacle of presumption. We say amongst men, that comparisons are odious; but this is the most odious comparison of all, for a man to compare himselfe with God, his thoughts with Gods thoughts, what he hath done or would doe, with what God doth.

If you consider the termes of opposition that are in the Text, this conclusion will be more clear unto you. Consider how Enosh, weak mortall man is opposite to Elohah, the mighty, the strong God; it is presumption for a weak man to compare with a strong [Page 112] man; what presumption is it then, for a weake man to compare with the mighty God? for a reed to compare in strength with a rock? for darknesse to compare with light? for a cloud to com­pare with the Sunne? for death to compare with life? for folly to compare with wisdome? for uncleanenesse to compare with holi­nesse? for nothing to compare with All, how presuptuous? Will ye provoke the Lord: (saith the Apostle, 1 Cor. 10.) are ye stron­ger than he? It implies, that some such thoughts lodge in man, as if he could make his partie good, with God, or might be stron­ger than he. And it is equall folly in us, and provocation against the Lord, to thinke our selves juster, as to thinke our selves stron­ger than he.

And then marke the other termes of opposition; Man and his Maker: Shall the great man, compare with, or be more pure than his Maker? as if he should say, How great and excellent soever this man is, he was made, and made by God, with whom he thus compares, than whom he thinks himselfe more pure. And shall the thing formed, stand upon termes with him that formed it? shall the potsheard or the pot, contend with the Potter? what though it be an excellent vessell; a vessell determined for the most excellent ends and uses? yet whatsoever it is, it was made to be, and made to be by God, both in its constitution and uses. Shall it then boast it selfe against its maker? The Lord made Geber as well as Enosh, the strong man, as well as the weake, the wise and learned man, as well as the foolish and ignorant, the Noble as well as the base, the holy and righteous, as well as the wicked and pro­phane; In a word, the vessels of honour are as much, yea more of his making than the vessels of dishonour, shall they then be more pure than their Maker? hath the Lord given more to others, than he hath in himselfe? hath he made a creature his superior, or his Peere? hath his bounty impaired his own stock, or hath he made man, more than God? That God hath made the best out of the dust, is enough to lay all our pride and boasting as low as the dust. That, what we are, we are from another, should ever keep us hum­ble in our selves.

Thirdly, Take this Conclusion, That God in himselfe is most just and pure. Shall mortall man be more just than God? The question hath this position in it, that God is infinitely just, infinitely pure, therefore he is perfectly pure, perfectly just. God is es­sentiall Justice, essentiall purity; Justice and purity are not quali­ties [Page 113] in God, but they are his very nature; A man, may be a man and yet be unjust, but God cannot be God and be unjust; A man, may be a man and yet impure, but God cannot be God and be impure, so that Justice and purity are not qualities or accidents in God, but his very essence and being; destroy or deny the purity and Justice of God, and you put God out of the world, as much as in you lies: for he cannot be God, unlesse he be both just to others, and pure in himselfe.

Fourthly, Take this conclusion, The best men compared with God are evill, and the holiest are impure. Not onely is it pre­sumption but a lye, for men to compare with God; shall mortall man be more just than God? It is as if he should say, man hath no Justice at all compared with God, shall man be more pure than his Maker? Man compared with his Maker, hath no purity at all, not so much as a name or a shadow of Justice, and purity, com­pared with God: though it be somewhat in it selfe, yet it is no­thing before him: In thy sight, or before thee, shall no flesh living be justified, or be just. All that righteousnesse and purity, which God hath put into the creature, is but as the light of a candle, to the light Humana justi­tic divinae com­parata injuhi­tia est; qu [...]a et lu [...]e [...]a in tene­br [...] [...] cer­ni [...]u [...], [...] in so­lis radio posita tenebratur. Greg. of the Sunne, the candle hath no light in it, compared to the Sunne; the candle enlightens the night, but a thousand candles cannot a day, or make the day lighter then it is; Sun-light overcomes and swallowes up candle-light: The Starres helpe us to see in the dark, but in the bright day time, the Starres themselves cannot be seene: so all creature purity disappeares and vanisheth, vvhen once vve looke upon the purity of God, who is light, and in vvhom there is no darknesse at all. The Apostle Paul hath a parallel expression (2 Cor. 3. 10.) speaking of the administration of the Jewish cere­moniall, earthly shadowes, and the administration of light in Go­spell heavenly ordinances; Even that which was made glorious, had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth: I doe not deny (saith he) but there was great glory in the Jewish Church; Gods institution stampt excellency upon the worship of the Jewes; Their Ceremonies were made glorious; but if you vvill compare Jewish vvorship to Christian vvorship, it hath no glory in it at all; that which was made glorious, had no glory by reason of the glory that excelleth, that is, Gospell glory. So vve may say, man who vvas made glorious, man vvho was made gra­cious and just, hath no grace, no justice, no glory in him, in com­parison of that glory which doth excell; namely that justice and [Page 114] purity, which is in God. God is so true, that all men are lyars, Rom. 3. 4. So righteous, that all mans righteousnesses are a filthy Cajus partici­patione justi sunt, ejus com­paratione nec justi sunt. Aug. lib. ad Orosium. c. 20. ragge. Isa. 64. 6. Man, who is just by participation from God is not just in comparison of God.

The fifth Conclusion is this, and it is the principall point which we are to receive and attend from this Text. God is so just, so pure in himselfe, that he nether doth, nor can doe wrong to any creature: In this truth, Eliphaz aimes to instruct Job chiefely; for he supposed, that Job had complained of God, as if he had done him wrong, wherefore he speakes reprovingly and chidingly, shall mortall man be more just than God? as if he should say, art thou so grosse as to charge God with doing thee an injury? It is impossible that God should doe any man wrong? (de Facto) he doth no man wrong, and, (de Posse) he cannot wrong any man. The power of God is seene most in this, that he cannot doe any evill; This impotencie (if we may so call it) is the strength of God; yea the omnipotency of God consists in this, that he can doe no wrong. We have a Maxime of state amongst us, (and it is the glory of the Kings of this Nation) we say, The King can doe no wrong; but it is not to be understood as this, God can doe no wrong; we know Kings are men, and that's enough to prove they may doe wrong: As to say, the Lord is God, is enough to prove, that he cannot. Princes have a naturall power to doe evill, but (which is his glory) God hath not. The meaning then is, the King hath not any civill power to doe wrong; the Law hath so bounded, ordered and directed him; The constitution of the King­dome hath given him the advice of Parliaments and Counsellours, the assistance of Judges and Officers, he acts by others: so that The failings of his Ministers doe the subject wrong, the regall power doth it not. But when we speake thus of God, we meane it of his naturall power, which being essentially and infinitely just and good, as well as soveraigne and supreme, there is not the least imaginable seed in him, which should be procreative of the least in­justice: Therefore the Scripture describes the Lord, just and holy, not only in his nature, but in all his works and wayes, Psal. 145. 17. The Lord is righteous in all his wayes, and holy in all his works. And this implyes, not onely that all the wayes, wherein the Lord walks, are righteous, and the works he doth, holy: but that he can goe in no way but a righteous way, nor doe any worke in the crea­ture, but a worke of holinesse. Not onely is that just and holy, which [Page 115] the Lord doth, but let the Lord doe what he will, that will be just and holy.

And here give me leave, somewhat to enlarge this, and plead for God against some objections, which are made by the men of the world, and some temptations which Satan will urge strongly upon the hearts of those, who feare God; by which (possibly) they may be so entangled and gravel'd, that they know not how to extricate themselves, or make out the justice of God, in his ad­ministrations towards men.

For first it will be objected, Is God so just, that he neither doth nor can doe injustice to the creature? How comes it to passe, that both the righteous and the wicked, fall under the same judgement: if the judgement be right upon a wicked man, surely it cannot be right upon the righteous man; Is God righteous and just, when they who differ as much as Heaven and Hell, as light and dark­nesse, doe yet meete (as it were) under the same act of God, and are wrapt together in the same sentence? If it be Justice upon the wicked, if it be their portion, how can it be the portion of the righteous, or an award of Justice upon them? As Abraham plead­ed with God, (Gen. 18. 25.) Shall the righteous be slaine or perish with the wicked? that be farre from thee to doe in this manner, shall not the Judge of all the earth doe right? as if he should say, if thou doest involve a just man, and a wicked man in one and the same judgement, this is not to doe as a righteous Judge, farre be it from thee to doe such a thing. Yet we see in frequent experien­ces, that the same judgement falleth upon the righteous and the wicked; By sword, famine, pestilence, by stormes at Sea and ene­mies at Land, both are overtaken and fall together. Is this uner­ring Justice?

Justiee is to give every one his portion, his due. And God hath Justitia est su­um cui (que) [...] ­buere. given this exact distribution in charge, to the Prophet, he must say so, and will not the Lord doe so? (Isa. 3. 10, 11.) Say ye to the righteous, it shall be well with him, for they shall eate the fruit of their doings; woe unto the wicked, it shall be ill with him, for the re­ward of his hands shall be given him; But how doe the dispensati­ons of God, answer this direction to man, when his providence seemes to huddle up all together, to make the same portion serve, both the righteous and the wicked?

I answer it first in the generall, and then in some particulars. In the generall, the troubles of the righteous are good for them, [Page 116] and therefore they have that which is promised; God saith, say to the righteous it shall be well with him: when a righteous man is troubled, it is vvell with him; therefore he hath that, which God promiseth him; and when a wicked man prospereth, it is ill with him, therefore he hath that, vvhich God thratneth against him. Outward mercy is judgement to wicked men, and their prosperity is their undoing: therefore, do not think that God varies a tittle from the tenour of his word, when he saith, it shall be ill with wic­ked men, and yet you see them prosper; for it is never worse with them, then when they prosper, then when they think it is best, and when the world thinks so too; the prosperity of fools shall destroy Prov. 1. them; and what prosperity is there in destruction? The meat in their mouthes, is as a sword in their bowels. If you saw the Lord formally sending a Sword to devoure wicked men, you would think it justice: the prosperity of wicked men is as sharpe as a Sword, that can but destroy, and so doth this; It is their judge­ment, that they are without judgements, and not to be smitten is their scourge.

Now more particularly to answer this objection about the justice of God. And it will be but needfull, considering the times we live in, threaten us with a common deluge, or an overflowing scourge, vvhich may sweep away both good and bad together.

First, in reference to the godly. Are they in a sad estate out­wardly? are they in great afflictions? I answer, though they are afflicted, yet they prosper. When they are impoverished, they are enriched, when they are as having nothing, they possesse all things. What is there? vvhat can there be, even in their saddest estate, which doth not conduce to their good, vvhich will not be a benefit unto them?

For first, their troubles are but trials; now is there any hurt in a triall, or perturbation in a probation? Troubles try their graces, and their corruptions too. Trouble tryes grace that it may be ho­nour'd, and corruption that it may be mortified; there is no hurt in all this: rather it is a most happy condition, which makes grace conspicuous: whereby a mans best side, his inside (wherein his glory lies, The Kings Daughter is glorious within) is turned out­ward. That Scripture (Dan. 11. 33, 34, 35.) is very pregnant to the point in hand; where the Prophet foretelling troublesome times, saith, They that understand amongst the people shall in­strust many, yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by cap­tivity [Page 117] and by spoyle many dayes: They that understand, that is, god­ly men shall fall by these judgements, some of them by the sword, they shall utterly be cut off; some by flame, they shall be burnt to ashes: others by captivity and by spoile, their estates shall be plun­dered, their persons imprisoned. How doth this answer the justice of God (will carnall reason object) that it shall be thus ill, with the righteous, to whom the Lord promiseth it shall be well? Yes, well enough. For it followeth, Now when they shall fall, they shall be holpen with a little helpe, and some of them of understanding shall fall, (that is, by captivity, and by spoile) to try them, and to purge them, and to make them white. Here are two remarkable ends, why They of understanding, fall into these evils. First, for probation, to try them. Secondly, for cleansing and purgation, to purge them and make them white. Gold is never wrong'd, by being tryed. A spotted garment, a distempered body, are not damnified by wash­ing, or by purging. To be freed from filth without, and bad hu­mours within the body, is more then a common favour. How high an act of favour then is it, to have ill humours and filthy spots washed, purged out of the soule? Such base humours a good man may have, as call for these strong working pils, Spoyling and Cap­tivity, to cast them out. Now those men of understanding have no more hurt intended them by God, when they fall into spoilers hands, then when a diseased body fals into a Physitians hand, or when a defiled garment fals into a Fullers hand; sc. to purge and make them white. Affliction is a cleanser. Christ is the onely lava­tory, and his blood the onely Fountaine to wash away the guilt of sinne; yet God hath other Fountains and Lavatories, to wash away the pollution of sin: That blood cleanses in this sense also, princi­pally; and all the waters or fires of affliction have no efficacy at all, to refine or cleanse, but in vertue of that blood. A Crosse without a Christ never made any man better: But with Christ, all are made better by the Crosse. We may then say at least, that it is well with the righteous in affliction, forasmuch as (through the blessing of God) they are bettered by affliction. When you see a godly man cast out in the open aire, and having the waters of sorrow powred continually upon him, know that he is only laid out a whitening, and will appeare shortly more resplendant then ever.

Secondly, afflictions are sent to humble. Pride is such a weed, as often growes in the best soyle: Now that which humbleth us can­not hurt us; we lose nothing by the abatements of our pride: no, [Page 118] the more pride loses, the more we gain. And we seldome or never lose any thing, but by pride. Now saith God, Deut. 8. 1. If you would have an account, vvhy I brought my people about in the wildernesse, through so many difficulties; know, this vvas my de­signe, it was to humble them. God resists pride wheresoever he findes it (they in vvhom pride totally prevailes, are Gods enemies and he resists them) they in vvhom pride hath some, yea great pre­valency, may be Gods friends, and God will resist pride in them: the difference is observable betvveen resisting of pride, and resisting the proud; the resisting of the person, and the resisting of the sin. The great resistance, vvhich God makes against the pride of mans heart, is by the rods of affliction; he vvhips them into humility, and by taking away carnall comforts, takes them off from carnall con­fidence. And O blessed affliction which makes us lesse to our selves, and all creatures lesse to us. We are never so much in Gods eye, as vvhen vve are least in our own: nor have vve ever so much of God, as vvhen vve expect little, or least from man; say therefore it is well with the righteous, vvhen they are in the deeps of affliction; for it is but to bring them off their Mountaines of pride, that they may be exalted in the strength and love of God, even upon the Mountain of his Holinesse and their glory for ever.

Thirdly, Afflictions bring the Saints nearer to God. Troubles abroad cause the soule to looke inwards and homewards. Is there any hurt in being brought neerer to God? It is good for me to draw neer unto God, says David; and it is good for us to be drawn neer unto God, if vve vvill not come of our selves: It is a desireable vio­lence, vvhich compels us heaven-ward. Heaven is but our nearest being unto God; and by how much vve are nearer God on earth, so much the more vve have of Heaven, upon earth. Afflictions (as in the Prodigals example) put us upon thoughts of returing to God, and the more vve returne, the nearer vve are unto him; returning thoughts vvill not rest, but under our fathers roofe: yea, returning thoughts vvill not rest, till vve are got into our fathers armes, or un­der the shadow of his wing, and this a happy condition indeed. As it vvas vvith Noahs Dove (Gen. 8. 9.) vvhen she vvas sent forth of the Ark, she could finde no place for the soal of her foot to rest on; she knew not vvhether to go, for the vvaters vvere on the face of the whole earth; therefore she returneth back, and comes ho­vering about the Ark, as desiring to be taken in: but after the vva­ters vvere asswaged, he sent out a Dove, vvhich returned to him no [Page 119] more. So when it is faire weather in the world, calme and serene; even Doves keepe off from God; and though they goe not quite away from him, yet they are not so desirous of comming to him: but when we finde a deluge in the world, such stormes and tem­pests of trouble, that we know not where to fix our souls for a day, then we come as the Dove fluttering about the Ark, and cry to our Eternall Noah, that we may be near him, yea, within, with him. Wicked men (like the Raven, which Noah sent out first, Verse 7. and returned not againe) care not for the Ark of Gods presence in the greatest troubles: to be neare God is more troublesome to them, then all their troubles. But Believers, like the Dove, will look home (at least) in foul weather. God is their chiefe friend at all times, and their onely friend in sad times. Is there any harme in this? Christ sends a storme, but to draw his back to the Ark; That, at the last, where he is, there they may be also.

Lastly, we may say it is well with the righteous in their worst condition of outward trouble, because, God is with them; It can never be ill with that man, with whom God is. It is infinitely more to say, I will be with thee, then to say, peace is with thee, health is with thee, credit is with thee, honour is with thee. To say, God is with thee, is all these, and infinitely more. For in these you have but a particular good, in God you have all good: when God sayes, I will be with you, you may make what you will out of it; sit down and imagine with your selves whatsoever good you can desire, and it is all comprehended in this one word, I will be with thee. Now God who is with the righteous at all times, is most with them in worst times; then he saith in a speciall sense, I will be with thee. When thou passest through the waters, I will be with thee. When thou walkest thhough the fire, thou shalt not be burnt, &c. Isa. 43. 2. When a mighty winde passed before Eliah, it is said, That God was 1 Kings 19. not in the winde: and when the Earthquake shook the Hils, and a consuming fire appeared, it is said, God was not in the Earth­quake, not in the fire. God joynes not with outward troubles, for the terror of his people, but he joynes with outward troubles, for the comfort of his people. So he is in the fire, and in the winde, and in the Earthquake, and his presence makes the fire but as a warme Sunne; the stormy winde, a refreshing gale; and the Earth­quake, hut a pleasant dance.

So much for the removing of this objection, and clearing up the justice of God, respecting the afflictions of the righteous.

If any shall look on the other hand upon wicked men, as if God came not home in his justice, vvhile he suffers them to prosper.

First I answer, their prosperity serves the providence of God, and therefore it doth not crosse his justice. That, vvas Nebuchad­nezars case, (Isa. 10. 6.) I will send him (saith God) against an hypocriticall nation: so then, he must prosper vvhile he goes upon Gods errand: but mark vvhat followes (Verse 12.) It shall come to passe, that when the Lord hath performed his whole worke upon Mount Zion, sc. by Nebuchadnezars power, vvho vvas but doing the just vvork of God, vvhile he thought ambitiously of doing his own, (novv it is no injustice for God, to give an instrument power to do his work) and vvhen his bloody lust hath performed the holy vvork of God, you shall see the Lord will take an order vvith him speedily, For) then saith the Lord, I will punish the fruit of the stout heart of the King of Assyria, and the glory of his high looks; God let him alone to doe the work, he had set him about; and it was a righteous work of God upon his people, though Nebuchad­nezzar went about it, wlth a proud and malicious spirit against his people.

Secondly, the prosperity of wicked men serveth them, but as an opportunity, to shew how wicked and vile they are; to act and publish the seven abominations of their own hearts. Now as it is one of the greatest mercies under Heaven, for a man to have his lusts quite mortified; so it is a very great mercy, for a man to have his lusts, but, restrained: It is a mercy for a man, to have that fuell taken away from his corruptions, upon which they feed: there­fore it must needs be wrath and judgement upon wicked men, when God in stead of restraining their lusts, giveth them opportunity to inlarge their lusts, and layes the reines on their neck, to run whether and which way they please, without stop or controule. This is wrath, and high wrath, a sore judgement, the sorest judgement that can fall upon them: wherefore when vve thinke they are in a most prosperous condition they are in the most dreadfull condition, they are but filling themselves with sin, and fitting themselves for de­struction. Many a mans lusts are altogether unmortified, which yet are chill'd and overawed by judgements. And there is more judge­ment in having liberty to commit one sinne, then in being shut up under the iron barres and adamantine necessities of a thousand judgements: He that is Satans treasury for sin, shall be Gods trea­sury for wrath.

Thirdly, Their prosperity is the judiciary hardning of their hearts, and a hard heart, is the greatest judgment on this side Hell; As there is a naturally inbred and sinfully acquired hard heart, so there is a judicially hardned, or a divinely inflicted hard heart: When to a naturall hard heart, and an acquired hard heart, which men get by many repeated acts of sin, the Lord adds a judicially hardned, or inflicted hard heart, then wrath is heated to the hot­test, and judgment is within one step of Hell. Especially if we consider, that every houre of such prosperous impenitence, and hardnesse of heart encreases punishment, and adds to the treasury of that wrath, which is stored up against the day of wrath, and the revelation of the righteous judgment of God. Who thinks that man happy, who is let alone only to gather a mighty pile of wood, and other fuell of flames to burne himselfe? while ungodly men saem to the world to be gathering riches, honour and pleasure, hey are but gathering a heap of wrath, and a pile of fire; which at the last will flame so bright, that it will make a revelation, of the (formerly secret, but) ever righteous judgement of God.

Lastly, To shew that God is just in all his dealings, both the righteous and the wicked, learne, from the end of both. That we may fully discover the Justice of God, we must looke upon all his works together; while we looke only upon some particular peece of Gods dealings with a godly man, he may seeme to deale very hardly with him: or if we looke but upon some particular peece of his dealings with a wicked man, God may seeme very gentle and kind towards him: but take all together, and the result is ex­act justice. It was a good speech of a moderne writer, We must Non est judi­candum de operibus Dei ante quintum actum. Per. Mart. not judge of the works of God, before the fifth act, that is, the last act or conclusion of all. This, and that part may seeme dissonant and confused, but lay them all together, and they are most har­monious and methodicall: Hence David (Psal. 37.) after he had a great dispute with himselfe, about the troubles of the righ­teous and the prosperity of the wicked, and was put hard to it, how to make out the Justice of God, resolves all in the close with this advice (ver. 37.) Marke the perfect man, and behold the up­right, for the end of that man is peace. Though a righteous man die in warre, yet, his end is peace, whereas though a wicked man die in peace, yet his end is warre. It is said (Deut. 8. 16.) that all which God did to his people in the wildernesse, was, that he might doe them good at the latter end. Come to the end therefore, and [Page 122] there you shall find justice visible: We often loose the sight of ju­stice, in our travailes and passage through the world, moun­taines and hils interpose, which we cannot see over or through; but when we come home, and arrive at the end of our travailes, Justice will appeare in all her state and glory, rendring to every man according to his deedes; To them who hy patient continuance in well doing, seeke for glory, and honour, and immortality, eter­nall life; but unto them that are contentious and doe not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousnesse, indignation and wrath.

Joshua concludes the story of the people of Israel, in their passage to Canaan, with the highest testimonies of Gods justice and faith­fulnesse; though God dealt with them so variously in the wildernes that they often murmured in their tents, as if he had done them wrong, yet in the close you shall find, how exact and punctuall the Lord was with them, (Josh. 21. 45.) There failed not ought of any good thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel, all came to passe: And in that other text, Josh. 23. 14 Behold this day I am going the way of all the earth, and you know in all your hearts, and in all your soules, that not one thing hath failed of all the good things, which the Lord your God spake concerning you, all are come to passe unto you, and not one thing hath failed there­of. How admirably just was God in his word? If a man promise many things, we take it well if he performe some of the chiefe, and them in the chiefe, though some what may faile. God promised many things, and performed all, and which is more, all of every one, of those many things promised. The texts compared, make this out, the one saying, That not one thing failed of all the good things, which God spake concerning them. And the other, That not ought of any good thing failed. So then, they had every good thing in kind, with each particular part and degree of every good thing: And for the truth of all this, Joshua makes his appeale to themselves, and to that in themselves, which was best able to de­termine it, All their hearts, and all their soules; which words doe not only referre to every person, as if the meaning were, The hearts and soules of you all; but rather to all that is in every per­son, All their hearts, and all their soules, that is, understandings, memories, consciences. affections, yea sences, their eyes and eares, their hands and mouthes, could bring in witnesse from their se­verall operations, to this great truth. And surely God in the end will deale as well with every Israelite, as he did with all Israel: [Page 123] A time will come, it will come shortly, when every Saint shall say, in all their hearts and in all their soules, that not one thing nor ought of any one good thing, which the Lord hath said concer­ning them, hath failed. I shut up this, in the words of Christ to his Disciples, when they were amused about that act of his, the washing of their feet, (John 13. 7.) What I doe, ye know not now, but ye shall know hereafter. Stay but a while, and all those my­steries and riddles of providence shall be unfolded. Though clouds and darknesse are round about him, yet Judgement and Justice are the habitation of his Throne, Psal. 97. Mortall man never had, and at last shall see he had no reason, to complaine of God; mortall man shall not be more just than God; nor shall man be more pure than his maker. And so much for the fifth Conclusion, That God neither doth nor can doe any injustice to the creature, he is just in his nature, just and holy in all his wayes.

The sixth or last Conclusion is this, That to complaine of Gods Iustior sit o­portet qui im­meri [...]ò affligi­tur quâ qui im­merio affligit. dealing with us, is to make our selves more just and pure than Gods or, when any person or people complaine of Gods dispensations toward them, they (though not formally, yet by way of inter­pretation) make themselves more just and pure than God. This was the point wherein Eliphaz labours much, to convince Job, supposing that he had thus exalted himselfe against God, by these grievous complainings of his present state, in the fore-going Chap­ter; There is a truth in the proposition, though not in the appli­cation, as hath often been hinted. Jobs complaints were bitter, from the sense of his paines, not from any prejudice in his under­standing. Quisq [...]is de persec [...]tione murmurat▪ quid aliud quam ju­dicium fe [...]ientis a [...]usat, purio­r [...]m ergo se vir factore suo ex­istimat si contra flagellum qu­relam parat, camque sibi proculdubio post ponit, c [...] ­jus judicium de sua afflictione r [...]d [...]gui [...]. G [...]eg. He ever preserved high and holy thoughts of God, The least suspition of whose righteous dealings, is to make our selves, by so much more righteous, then he. The reason is cleere, for, he that complaines thus, thinks some wrong is done him; Now he that complaines of wrong, would be thought more just, than he of whose wronging him, he complaines: Whosoever murmurs or repines at what God doth secretly saith (this voice is in it) that he could doe better, or that God ought: He that speaks against the rod, speaks a­gainst him that smites with the rod, He that sweares by Heaven, sweares by the Throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon, saith Christ; And so, he that accuses the rod of God, accuses the work of God, and God that wrought it: He thinks himselfe more pure then his Maker, who is displeased with God, as a correcter: To disapprove any thing which God doth, is to approve our selves before God. [Page 124] It is seasonable for us to look to our hearts in such a time as this; it is a time of temptation, let us not by our murmurings, make it a time of provocation: Possibly we may often see cause to com­plaine of men, but we can never have cause to complaine of God. There is but little good got by complaining of creatures but how much guilt and misery gets he, who complaines of his Creator? For a man to complaine to man, is in some cases necessary, but it is best in all cases, to complaine to God, and the worst of any case, to complaine (though silently) of God. So then, complaine of man to God, rather then of man, to men; complaine often to God, but never of God: Complaine before God, and tell him, that, such have dealt negligently, such falsely, such unjustly, such cruelly; But alwayes say, Lord thou hast done justly, even by those who are unjust; Lord thou hast done gratiously, even by those who are wicked; Lord thou hast done holily, even by the hand of those who are unholy; and thou hast dealt faithfully, though these have been treacherous. Thus let us complaine to God, but not of God. Every complaint of God will be interpreted, a secret justi­fication of our selves, and a condemnation of the righteous God. Man is then worse then a Devill, when he would make himselfe better then God: Nothing pollutes man, so much as this thought, that there is unrighteousnesse in God: Nothing debases the crea­ture so much, as that thought, desire or act, wherein he prefers and exalts himselfe above the Creator.

Thus we have opened the generall proposition: The probation of it, from the vast difference between men and Angels, is prosecu­ted at large, in the latter part of the Chapter.

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 18.‘Behold he put no trust in his servants, and his Angels he charged with folly.’

ELiphaz having laid the dignity of man (comparing with God) in the dust, by those humbling questions, in the former verse, what is man that he should be just? and shall man be more pure than his Maker? He now strengthens it further, that there is no comparison between God and mortall man, by a direct assertion, that there is no comparison between God, and immortall Angells. [Page 125] Behold he put no trust in his servants, and his Angels he charged with folly. As if he had said, If Angels are not able to stand be­fore God, and justifie themselves upon his enquirie; then certain­ly man, the best of men, who dwell but in houses of clay cannot: But Angels cannot justifie themselves before God, therefore much lesse can the best of men. That Angels are not able to justifie them­selves before God, he proves in these words: Behold he put no trust in his servants, and his Angels he charged with folly: They that cannot be trusted by God, cannot be justified by God: And they that are chargeable with folly, are not able to stand in judge­ment before the most wise, the only wise and holy God. Angels are excellent creatures, yet because creatures, they are in, and of themselves, fraile and weake: they have no strength to stand longer then upheld, no stedfastnesse to obey, longer than confirmed, no faithfullnesse to be loyall, longer than overruled, no wisedome to discerne, further than they are enlightned; what then will become of man, if he stand alone, or stand in competition with God his Maker? This is the summe and generall sense of the words as they are an argument. We will now consider them as they lye here in order.

Behold he put no trust in his servants.

The particle [Behold] in the Originall, as it often notes wonder in other texts, so it may, much more in this, Behold a wonder, Angels are foolish, Angels are not to be trusted; yet in this place, Behold, is put by way of affirmation, rather then of admiration. Be­hold he put no trust in his servants, is as much as verily and indeed, certainly and without controversie, he put no trust in his servants; So (Deut. 13 14.) Thou shalt inquire and search, and aske dili­gently, and behold if it be true; in the Hebrew thus, and behold true, or behold truth; that is, if upon enquirie it appeare, that sucb and such things are certainly so, then, they must proceed according to the Law provided in that case. Againe (Deut. 19. 18.) The Judges shall make diligent inquisition, and behold, if the witnesse be a false witnesse, so we translate; but the letter is, Behold the witnesse, a false witnesse, that is, if it be affirmed, and doe appeare that it is a false witnesse or testimonie which is brought, then the Judges shall proceed so and so, &c. Thus here, Behold he put no trust in his servants, is a vehement affirmation, that God sear­ching into those his servants, finds them such as are not to be trusted

But who are these untrusty servants? First, The Chaldee para­phrast understands by servants, the holy Prophets; Prophets (I grant) sometimes have, and oftner would have proved unfaithfull; some of them, discovered much, and others would have discovered more unfaithfulnesse, if God had not mightily supported them. Secondly, One of the Rabbins, understands it in generall of any, or of all the faithfull, Behold he put no trust in his servants; that is, not in any of the holiest and faithfullest of the children of men.

But the connexion of the text carries it clearely, that by ser­vants, we are to understand the Angels, who are called ministring spirits, Heb. 1. 14. Are they not all ministring spirits (or ser­vants) sent out for the good of those that are the heires of salvation? And so the words in the close of this verse, are exigeticall, expounding who are intended by those servants; Behold he put no trust in his servants, and his Angels he charged with folly; that is, he trusted not those servants the Angels, but charged them with folly. But there is a further reason, more fully evidencing that it must be understood of Angels, in the 19 verse, where the persons standing in equall opposition to these servants and Angels, are men H [...]w much lesse (saith he) on them that dwell in houses of clay: Now a dwelling in a house of clay, is the periphrasis, or description of mankinde in generall, good or bad, one or other, high or low, all mankinde dwels in a house of clay. Seeing then the terme of op­position is mankinde in generall, we must take somewhat which be­ing [...] Nutrivit in Hiphil credi­d [...]t fisus est A fide quae in nutr [...]endo re­quiritur, [...] a raionall creature is not man, for the other terme, which can­not be any except Angels; we cannot set any sort of men in oppo­sition to others upon this ground, because they dwell in houses of clay, for the Saints on earth dwell in houses of clay, as well as men of the earth; therefore to make the opposition clear, it necessarily follows, that by Servants in the first clause of the verse, Angels are implyed, as well as in the latter, where Angels are exprest. nutriius d [...]ctus est cujus fidei pue [...] est commissus, quasi fidum aut fide­tem dicas, saepe etiam accom­modatur ad ae­conomum & dispensatorem, proper fidelita­tem eorum,

But if these servants be Angels, how is it, that he put no trust in, or that (as we may render it word for word out of the Hebrew) he did not believe in these his servants? I shall answer that, when I have a little opened the wopd here translated To put trust. We finde it used two wayes in Scripture, sometime passively, and sometime actively. It is taken passively to be faithfull, trusty, and true in word or promise. From this root the Hebrew takes the name of a Guardian or Foster-father or Steward, because such to whose care children or families are committed, ought to be most faithful in the discharge of so great a trust.

The Apostle (1 Cor. 4. 1, 2.) speaking of that heavenly Steward­ship, the ministery of the Gospel, expresseth it thus, Let a man so account of us as of the Ministers of Christ, and Stewards of the mysteries of God, moreover (saith he) it is required in a Steward that a man be found faithfull. And (Numb. 12. 7.) where Moses is spoken of, as a servant, he is thus described, My servant Moses is not so, who is faithfull in all my house; he is a man whom I may trust or give credit to, for he is trusty and faithfull. (Heb. 3. 2, 5.) the Apostle comparing Christ and Moses, saith of Christ, That he was faithfull to him that appointed him, as Moses was faithfull in all his house. So that here is an elegant Antithesis, His servants, who according to their duty and office, ought to be constant, faith­full, trusty; he found unconstant unfaithfull, not to be trusted.

Yet the word being in Hyphil, is of an active signification, and [...] A verbi preprietate non rece­damus, qua sig­n [...]ficat cum [...] credere & fide­re alicui Merc Verbum de ver­bo in servos su­os credidit. when it is in construction with Beth (as Grammarians observe) it imports to give credit unto, or confide in a person; and so here, he put no trust; that is, he did not credit or condfie in those servants, or he did not believe on them. He saw somewhat in them, which might betray them to disloyaltie, if himselfe withdrawing his assi­stance should make an experiment, or try what was in their hearts. And this sense is most suitable to the state and office of a servant: trusting or not trusting, faithfulnesse, or unfaithfulnesse, are acts proper to that relation, Lord and Servant. So then the Lord put no trust, or he could not confide in his servants, they being such as he found not perfectly sure and loyall unto him. We say common­ly of a man whom we cannot rrust, We will not give our word for him, and we will not take his. Our Lord Christ is therefore called a faithfull High Priest, because his Father trusted him with the whole businesse of our salvation, without the least misgiving thought of his faithfulnesse, or the miscarriage of the work. Thus Solomon describes a faithfull Wife and a confiding Husband, Prov. 31, 10, 11. A rare couple indeed, and as rarely found. Therefore he makes proclamation for such a woman; who can finde a vertuous Woman? for her price is farre above Rubies, the heart of her Husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoile: there's confidence to the height, the heart of her Husband doth safely trust in her. A Husband that hath such a Jewell to his Wife, knowes, she will order the family with discretion at home, when he's abroad: he knowes she is faithfull to him body and goods. Her chastity or her frugality never came in question before [Page 128] his thoughts; therefore (saith he) I shall have no need of spoile, which some interpret thus: her care and wisdome in providing for the family, will make it like an Army, which hath overcome the Tam circum. fluit bonis om­nibus familia ejus quam mi­lites spolijs ex pugnata urbe, out hoste supe­ra [...]o. Enemy in the field, or wonne a wealthy City, where the Souldi­ers have spoile or pillage enough, they need no spoile. Or as others, He shall have no need of spoile, that is, he shall have no need to spoile or oppresse others, to helpe his family. All things shall be so ordered by his wives prudence, that he shall not need to take any unjust way, to provide for, or supply his house­hold. Thus the heart of her husband doth safely trust in her. Such trust the heart of God could not put in those servants, his Angels, he knew they might come short in their accounts. Such trust Christ could not give some, who seemed to trust or believe on him, (John 2. 23.) Many seeing Christs miracles believed on him, yet Christ would not believe on them; we translate, he would not commit himselfe to them; the Greek is, he did not believe or trust himselfe [...]. unto them, Christ believes in, or may trust them all the world over, who truly believe in him: But these believed so falsely upon him that he could not believe fully upon them; and the text gives the reason, For he himselfe knew all men, he knew, they were not metall of a due temper, and therefore not to be trusted. So God knew all Angels, the uttermost perfection, power, and vertue that was in Angels, therefore he would not commit all to them, he would not believe upon them. We finde the word belief thus used, (Exod. 14. 31.) when the children of Israel saw the great work, that the Lord had wrought in destroying the Egyptians, it is said, The people feared the Lord, and believed the Lord, and his servant Moses; he puts God and Moses as the joynt object of their faith: as they had formerly been of their unbelief▪ Except the servants of the Lord be believed, the Lord himselfe is not. And when they are believed, the Lord is. Believe in the Lord your God, believe his Prophets, saith good Jehosaphat to his people, 2 Chron. 20 20. Moses had told them enough of the power of God before, he had undertaken they should be delivered, but they would not trust Mo­ses upon his word, nor would they trust the Word of God: yet now when they saw this great deliverance, present sight wrought faith for the time to come: they perceived by this miracle, that the Lord and Moses were to be credited, & they doubted not, to credit them another time. Though that faith which comes in at the eyes only, seldome goes downe so low, as the heart, or sees further and [Page 129] longer then the eye. Thus we may understand the first part of the Verse, He put no trust, no belief in his servants, he gave no credit to them, as knowing perfectly what their nature and power was, what both could do: that if left by God, they would quickly leave God, and prove unfaithfull.

I shall observe one point, before I come to the latter part of the Verse (for there the suspition of disloyaltie upon the Angels comes more fully to be considered) from the title here given to the Angels, His servants, he put no trust in his servants, Angels are the servants of God. They are his servants, as being altogether at his command, and they are his servants, as being fully conformable to his commands. These great and glorious Spirits, come under the same title and denomination with men, who dwell in houses of clay, servants of God. To serve God, is not only the duty, but it is the honour of the highest creatures. It is more honour to serve God, then to rule the world. The stile of the good Angels, is, Ministring Spirits, Heb. 1. but the stile and title of the evill Angel, is, Prince of the power of the aire, God of this word: you would think these were weighty titles, Prince of the aire, God of the world, but the additions diminish their weight, yea, make them lighter then vanity, or rather, heavie only with misery: There is more glory in being a servant of God, than in being a god of the world, or a Prince of the power of the aire.

I might here enlarge my enquiry into the services of Angels, in what they are servants, and what their offices and duties are, but I shall only touch. Their service may be considered either in respect of the Church, or the enemies of the Church. Respecting the Church and people of God, they have such services as these.

First, they are as messengers to carry and reveale the minde of God. They are as Tutors and instructors of the Churches, Dan. 8. 9. God sent his Angel to teach Daniel the mysterie of those visi­ons. And Rev. 1. 11. an Angel was sent to instruct John, Chap. 22. 16. I Jesus have sent mine Angell to testifie these things in the Churches.

Secondly, they are sent as guardians and protectors of the peo­ple of God, to take their part, and to be on their side, Psal. 34. 7. The Angel of the Lord encampeth round about them that feare him. Psal. 91. 11. He giveth his Angels a charge over them, lest at any time they should dash their feet against a stone. Gen. 32. 2. When Jacob journied, it is said, the Angels of God met him; [Page 130] an army of Angels was his Convoy, Gods Hoast coming out for his protection and safeguard, and therefore he called the name of that place Nahanaim, that is, two Hosts or Camps; either because the Angels appeared in two bands, and so made as it were a guard for Jacob to passe between them. Or, because the great An­gelicall Royall Army, quartered and marched with Jacobs little Army; and so two confederate Armies appeared in the field to­gether. Angels are called Chariots, Psal. 68. 17. The Chariots of God are twenty thousand, even thousands of Angels. That is, God useth Angels for defence of his people, as Chariots in Warr. The ancient Prophets were called the Chariots of Israel, (2 King. 3. 13.) and the Angels are the Chariots of God. Our strongest Mi­litia is of Spirits, or of men spiritualiz'd.

Thirdly, Angels suggest good things, holy thoughts to us. If the Devill, who is an evill Angel, a wicked spirit, can suggest evill, sin­full filthy thoughts, and help on the heart in wickednesse; then doubtlesse a good Angel can help on the heart in holinesse, in hea­venly thoughts and meditations. Christ speaks of Judas, that Sa­tan had put it into his heart to betray him, John 13. and Peter to Ananias (Acts 5.) Why hath Satan filled thine heart to lye to the Holy Ghost? The nature of a good Angel is as fit, his power gi­ven as great, to deale with our spirits, as either the nature or the power of an evill Angel. That of the Apostle (2 Cor. 11. 14.) gives a hint, if not a proofe of it, where he tels the Corinthians, That deceitfull workers transforme themselves into the Apostles of Christ, and no marvell, for Sathan himselfe is transformed in­to an Angell of light, and when is Satan in this change from an Angel of darknesse to an Angel of light? even when He suggests good for evill ends, or evill for good ends. And if he is called an Angel of light for this reason, then Angels of light, good Angels suggest good, for good ends; otherwise, Satan could not be said to imitate them, in suggesting good for ill ends, and under specious pretences of bringing glory to God, tempting to transgresse the will of God.

Fourthly, good Angels comfort, strengthen and support, in times of distresse, anguish and trouble: an Angel comforted Hagar Gen. 21 and (Matth. 4. 10.) after Christ had finished his terrible combat with that wicked Angel, the good Angels came and mi­nistred unto him. Againe, when he was in that most bitter Agony in the garden (Luke 22. 43.) an Angel appeared to him from Hea­ven, [Page 131] strengthning him. That which they do to Christ the Head, they do to his members in their proportion.

Their fifth service, is to conveigh and carry the soules of depart­ed Saints to Heaven: they are Heavenly Porters (Luke. 16. 22.) Lazarus dyed, and was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome.

Lastly, they shall convocate and gather all the Elect together at the last day, Matth. 24. 31. Their services against the wicked and all enemies of the Church have been many and great. Angels assist Saints, and oppose the opposers of Sion. Two Angels were sent upon a message of destruction to Sodome; an Angel defeated the Hoast of Senacherib; an Angel smote bloody persecuting Herod; Angels (by name, if not by nature) powre out the seven vials of Gods wrath in the Revelation. And at the last day Angels shall hurry the wicked to Christs Tribunall; they are heavenly Pursi­vants; and they shall bundle the Tares up together, as fuell to be throwne into everlasting burnings, Matth. 13. 41, 42.

And it may be a great comfort to us, that God hath such servants. When visible dangers are round about us, we should remember, God hath invisible servants round about us. There are more with us, then against us, as Elisha told his fearfull servant, 2 Kings 6. And in that low estate of the Church, Zech. 1. 8. the Prophet is shewed Christ in a vision standing among the Mirtle trees in the bottome, (the Mirtle trees in the bortome, noted the Church in a low estate) and behinde him there were red Horses, speckled and white; that is, horsemen speckled and white. These diverse colou­red Horses were Angels appointed for severall offices, as the lear­ned Junius (with others) interprets it; The red horses being ap­pointed for judgement, the white for mercy, and the speckled, (as he conjectures) for mixt actions, being sent out, at once to protect and help the people of God, and to execute wrath and judgement upon the adversary. Thus we see the services of the Angels; they are servants, yet such as the most wise God put no trust in; therefore we have an Angel better then Angels, even the Angel of the Cove­nant the Lord Jesus, into whose hands our safety is committed, to whose care the Church is left, in whom God puts the whole trust, knowing that this great Angel, is, and for ever will be faithfull, in and over his house, to his highest delight, and the Churches compleatest welfare.

[Page 132] And his Angels he charged with folly.
Nec in Angelis suis ponet lu­men Tagn. Nec in Angelis suis posuit lu­cem exactissi­mam- Vatab. Angelis suis posuit vesani­am, Tygur. In Angelis suis ponet gloratio­nem. Bibl. Reg. In Angelis suis reperit vanita­tem Sym. [...] Sept. [...] àradice [...] Splenduit, lux­it, claruit Me­taphoricè in pi­el, spiendidum, illustrem, cla [...]ū reddidit lauda­vit, praedica­vit. Per Anti­ph rasin. inglo­rius, insanus fu­rore actus fuit, insanivit.

There are very different readings of this part of the Verse. Some (as M. Beza) read it thus, He trusted not in his servants, though he had put light into those his messengers. Others reade it with a negation in both parts, He put no trust in his servants, nei­ther hath he put light in his Angels. Another thus, neither hath he put perfect light in his Angels. Mr. Broughton differs from all these, Behold he holdeth not perfection to be in his own servants, and in his Angels he judged no clear light to be. Another sort read it to these senses, He charged, or put madnesse in or upon his An­gels, he put or charged vaine boasting in, or upon his Angels, he found vanity in or amongst his Angels, he observed some evill a­mongst his Angels.

Now that which hath given occasion to this variety of transla­tings, is the different senses which the Originall yields us. The He­brew word is very fruitfull of significations, and hath (as the Ora­cle told Rebecca concerning two contrary Nations) two contrary meanings in the wombe of it, and that makes the strugling a­mongst Interpreters. The word in its proper sense signifies to shine forth with a resplendent brightnesse, so Chap. 29. 3. Job wisheth, O that I were as in moneths past, when the candle of God shined upon my head; it is a Verbe of which the word folly in this text of Job is a derivative. And (Isay 14. 12.) Hielel signifies the Morning star, whose shining brightnesse hath obtained the name Lucifer, Light-bringer, or Light-bearer. How art thou fallen from Heaven O Lucifer, sonne of the Morning? How art thou fallen from Heaven, Hielel, thou shining day-star? Thus, the word properly signifies shining or brightnesse, or to shine and be bright: and hence by a Metaphor to be Famous, or renowned, or to make one renowned or famous, or to paint out a man with praises; because a man is (as it were) decked with light, and hath rayes of brightnesse cast upon him, when he is honoured and adorned with praises. Due commendations are to a man as a robe or vesture of light, which makes him shine to all about him. And hence the word Halelu­jah is derived, praise ye Jah, or the Lord; used frequently both in the beginning and end of the Psalmes: in the beginning of the Psalmes by way of exhortation, and in the end by way of acclama­tion, crying up the honour and glory of God. And (to note that in passage) it is well observed, that this word Hallelujah is first used [Page 133] in the old Testament, Psal. 104. 35. where the utter consumption of sinners is mentioned; and in the New Testament it is first used, Rev. 19. 3 6. where the utter consumption of Antichrist is prophe­sied. Judgement on the wicked, is matter of high praise to God. Thirdly, the word signifies (by the figure Antiphrasis or contrary speaking) to boast and brag vainly, foolishly; or vaine foolish boast­ing. To commend or extoll our selves is pride running mad, and arrogance distracted. It is the highest dotage to be in love with our owne wisdome and folly, to publish our own works. There may be wisdom (though oftentimes there is a great deale of folly) in commending others, but in commending our selves, there can be nothing but folly: therefore the very same word which signifies to boast and commend our selves; signifies both the concrete, to be mad, vaine, or foolish; and the abstract, madnesse and folly: thus in Eccles. 2. 2, 12. the word is used, I said of laughter thou art mad. I turned my selfe to behold wisdome, and folly, and mad­nesse: and Psal. 75. 4. I said unto the fooles, deale not foolishly, or to the mad-men, do not play the mad-men, that is, do not exalt your selves, for so he clears his meaning in the fifth Verse, Lift not up your hornes on high, speak not with a stiffe neck, that is, a neck stifned with pride, and a horne lifted up with vaine-glory or self-confidence.

From this variety of significations, the variety of translations before toucht, ariseth. First they who read it, He put light into those his messengers, take the word in a proper strict sense, ma­king out the meaning thus; that God having put the light of excel­lent knowledge into the Angels, could not yet trust them: all their speculative knowledge, and high raised illuminations, were not enough to make them steadily and steadfastly holy: that is the intent of Mr. Beza's interpretation, He trusted not to his servants, though he had put light into those his messengers. For those who retaining the word light translate negatively, neither hath he put light in his Angels, or neither hath he put perfect light into his Angels; or as Mr. Broughton, In his Angels he judgeth no cleare light to be, putting a negative particle in both branches of the Verse, whereas in the Hebrew there is no expresse negati­on in the latter. These, I say, are led by this reason or rule. It is frequent in Scripture, when there is a negative in the former clause of a Verse, then to understand a negative also in the latter clause, though none be exprest. For instance (Psal. 9. 18.) The needy shall [Page 134] not alway be forgotten, the expectation of the poore shall not perish for ever; so we read, but in the Hebrew the latter clause is, the expectation of the poore shall perish for ever: there is no Negative in the Originall; but our Transtators, and not only they, but all that I have seen upon the place, render it so, supplying the Negative particle of the former, in the latter clause of that sentence. And without that negative, the sentence is not only imperfect, but untrue. Thus, The needy shall not alwayes be forgotten the expe­ctation of the poore shall perish for ever, this were a contradiction: but reading it, the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever, makes the whole a truth, and congruous in it self. Againe (Pro. 17. 26.) To punish the just is not good, to strike Princes for equity, so the letter of the Hebrew; but we reade it thus, To punish the just is not good, nor to stricke Princes for equity. I might give ynu other examples, but a tast may suffice Thus in the Text before us, when it is said in the first clause, he put no trust in his servants, we take up the negative, and say in the second, neither hath he put light into his Angels, or he did not put light in his Angels, or he put no perfect light in his Angels, or he judged not cleare light to be in his Angels.

Secondly, they, who (according to our Translation) render it madnesse or solly, vain boasting or vanity, these take the Originall in that figurative sence before given. When a man from a reflecti­on upon his own worth, boasts out his own praises, which, because it is a point of extreame vanity and folly, therefore the word is elegantly applyed to signifie folly, &c. He charged his Angels with folly. He put or laid folly upon, or to his Angels; He put, for so the Hebrew word bears. Not, that the vanity which is in Angels is of Gods putting, but the folly that is in them, he puts to them, or char [...]eth it upon them, or layeth it to their charge. As we say, [...] Such a one put it home upon him; that is, he charged him sound­ly, or fully, with such a crime or offence. To charge, is a ju­diciall or Law-term, implying, that the Lord sitting in judge­ment, to examine the state of Angels, charged them by way of ac­cusation, and upon triall found them (in a sense) guilty of that, which, though they had not formed into any one sin, yet might be formed and shap'd into any sin, Folly or vaine-glory.

Having given some account of those tearms, Charging and Folly, He charged his Angels with folly, it growes to a great doubt what Angels we are here to understand: what Angels did God thus [Page 135] charge with folly? The quere or doubt lies, whether we shall lay this charge at the doore of the good Angels, or of the bad, or of both.

Many of the Ancients restrain it to the evill Angels to the Apo­state Angels; God put no trust in them, he saw folly in them; ta­king it for confessed, that the Angels which stood, the good An­gels are trusty servants, discreet and wise, farre from, either unfaith­fulnesse or folly; such, as God hath put trust in, and they never deceiv'd his trust; such whose obedience is made the pattern of ours, by Christ himself in his patterne of prayer, Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven. And would the Lord regulare us by them who are themselves irregular? or make them our copy in do­ing his will, whose folly renders them unfit to be trusted with the doing of his will? Therefore (say these) such a charge suits not the state and condition of the good Angels.

Others cast it upon the good Angels, that God put no trust, no, not in them. I conceive, from either there may be a good sense, though I incline to the latter. For in the Apostate Angels (take it in the broadest sense) God saw no light, no goodnesse, no faithful­nesse at all; they have plainly discovered themselves, and shewed, not only weaknesse and unfaithfulnesse, but wickednesse and ut­most folly. But to confine it to the evill Angels, or to understand it chiefly of them, is too narrow for the Text; especially, seeing Angeli boni exse nihil habent nisi insantam negativè, i. e. nullam exse sa­p [...]entiam, nul­lam veritatem, bonitatem nul­lam. this is but a light, a too easie charge for those Apostate Spirits to say onle thus that God found unfaithfulnesse in them, and charged them with folly: for in them rebellion was found, and they stand charged to this day with High Treason, against the Crowne and dignity of the King of Heaven: and are therefore committed to prison, and reserved in chaines of darknesse to the judgement of the great day. As for the good Angels, God may be said to charge them with folly without any wrong, either to the holinesse of their nature, or the stedfastnes of their obedience. For upon ex­amination (or intuition rather) he finds, they have no wisdome, or stability, but by Divine bounty and establishment. As the apostate Angels were positively full of folly and unfaithfulnes so the good Angels might be charged with folly, negatively, namely, that they had no faithfullnesse, but as assisted and propt up.

But, we may take the Angels in a third or middle consideration neither for the fallen or apostate Angels, nor for the good and con­firmed Angels as distinct, or since this distinction: But by Angels we may understand the Angelicall nature; the whole complex [Page 136] nature of Angels in their creation and constitution was such, as God could not trust fully unto, such as he saw folly in. We may demonstrate this plainly, because a great part of the Angels (and it is questioned whether or no the geater part) but it is clear, that a great part of the Angels, a whole Regiment at least, proved disloy­all, and fell together: therefore the Angelicall nature (in that ab­stracted notion) is subject to folly and unfaithfulnes, as well as man, although they are of a more excellent make and constitution then man. God looking upon Angels in generall, saw they were not to be trusted; the event also shewing many of them (who were as good by nature as they who stand) falling from him discovering their folly and nakednesse to all the world.

But it may be questioned yet, how there could be folly in the Angelicall nature, for as much as God viewing and reviewing all the works, which he had made, saw every thing which he had made, and behold it was very good.

I answer, first God charged them with folly comparatively, re­specting himself. As (1 Tim. 6. 16.) the Apostle saith of God, that he only hath immortality; that speech is exclusive, shutting out all other creatures from a participation of Gods immortality. Yet we know Angels are immortall, Angels dye not, therefore also they are opposed to men (in the next Verse to the Text) who live in houses of clay, whose foundations are in the dust, and are crush­ed before the moth; Angels are not crushed, they dye not, yet God only is immortall; because the immortality of Angels compared with the immortality of God, is but mortality. And the reason is this, because Angels are not immortall in themselves, or of them­selves, they have not originall or absolute immortality, their im­mortality is dependent and derivative; God only is independent­ly In comparatio­ne justitiae Dei sinec sancti in coelis Angeli ju­sti essedicantur, non mihi vide­tur importuna sententia, non quia ut hoc es­sentà justitia lapsi sunt, sed quia facti sunt & Deus non sunt. August. cont. Prisc. and originally immortall, and hence he only is said to have im­mortality. As it is in the point of life, so also of righteousnesse, wisdome, and faithfulnesse. God only is faithfull, he only is wise, that's the Apostles phrase, To God only wise: Men, yea Angels, are unfaithfull, unwise, foolish, compared with God. He is wise of himself, and in himself, in his own compasse creatures have only what they borrow or receive from him. To this sense on of the Ancients speaks fully, In comparison of the justice of God, if the holy Angels in heaven be called unjust, I see no hurt in the assertion not because they have fallen from justice, but because they are creatures, and not God. All is resolved into this, they are creatures, that's [Page 137] enough to prove their folly, and unfaithfulnesse And, if a man that hath not only some smattering of learning and knowledge but is a professed Scholer, be looked upon as ignorant, compared with the Ben-clerks and great Scholers of the world; is it any wonder that Angels should be called fools, in reference to the infinite wisdome of God? The foolishnesse of God is wiser then men, and the weak­nesse of God is stronger then men. And it is as true of Angels, the foolishnesse of God is wiser then Angels, and the weaknesse of God is stronger then Angels. Angels are called Principalities and powers, but yet, it is only because they act in the power of God; and go forth in his strength, that's the first answer. The whole na­ture of Angels is unfaithfull and foolish, weighed with God.

Secondly, I answer, although in the Angels there is no actuall unfaithfulnesse or folly, yet there is possible folly & unfaithfulnesse in Angels; and, this potentiality is the thing here meant or aimed at. Cuicun (que) c [...]ea­turae hoc con­venit, ut pecca­re non possit hoc habet ex dono gratiae, non ex conditione na­turae. Aqin. p 1 ques [...]. 63. Art. 1. The Holy Angels that now stand are wise and faithfull altogether, yet considered in themselves (not as confirmed by Christ) they may fall; their condition is altered, but their constitution is the same. It is otherwise with man (which makes a wide difference between Angels and men.) Man not only hath a potentiality to be foolish & unfaithfull, but man is actuall foolish and unfaithfull; yea man in himself is nothing else, but a bundle of folly and unfaith­fulnesse. Whereas Angels in themselves, or considered in their na­turall constitution, have no folly actually in them at all. The na­ture of man is nothing but sinne, and Angels have no sinne at all in their nature; they only have a potentiality, a possibility in their nature to sinne. So then, we must understand this charge of folly with two cautions concerning Angels. First, there was not any folly concreated with them, their nature is purely pure. Secondly, they have not contracted any folly into their nature. The folly of the good Angels is but like the folly of man in the state of innocen­cy, when he had only a power to sin: which possibility of Angels to sin is by the mediation of Christ (wherein these Angels have a share though not to redeem or raise them from their Fall (as man) yet to confirme and keep them from falling) I say, by the mediation of Christ that possibility is removed. Christ hath changed their possi­bility to sin, into an impossibility of sinning. This is a glorious pri­viledge indeed, and that which all the Saints shall have in glory. Redemption hath not only bettered the condition of man, but the condition of Angels. Now they all excell in strength, doing the [Page 138] commandements of God, and harkning to the voice of his word for ever. Psal. 103. 20.

We may hence learne, first, What the sin of Angels was, God charged his Angels with folly; The possible sin, which God saw and still sees, in the nature of Angels, was the actuall sin of Angels. Pride & selfe confidence were the sins of Angels, and these are the most proper sins of Angels; Angels cannot fall into every sin. The Schooleman questions, Whether the first sin of Angels was pride? He argues and concludes that howsoever in regard of guilt, the De­vils, Aquin pa [...]. 1. q. 63. art. 1. or fallen Angels, have all sins upon them, because they tempt man to every sin (For he that tempts another to a sin which him­selfe commits not, or is incapeable to commit is as guilty, as if he had committed it) yet in regard of the act it selfe, evill angels can only commit those sins, which are sutable to a spirituall nature.

Now a spirituall nature, is not affected with those sins, which be­long to a corporall or sensitive nature; Devils are not adulterers, they are not drunkards; theirs are spirituall sins, and their chiefe spirituall sin, was pride; Their first sin consisted in not submitting themselves to that condition, wherein God placed them, and whereunto they were appointed. All agree it was pride, though there be different opinions about what this pride shewed if selfe; whether in affecting a higher degree, then God created them in refusing the work and office God set them about, (which some conceive, was the ministration to, or the guardianship of man, which trust they deserted or scorned) or whether it were in affe­cting a further condition upon their own strength, not looking to the strength and grace of God, whatsoever the particular was, the generall is plaine, they abode not in the truth, they kept not their station: Pride and ambition swel'd them, till they brake and fell.

Secondly observe, Angels (as creatures) are mutable crea­tures, A [...]geli f [...]e­rum à Deo creati beati [...]eatitudine n [...] ­tura [...], non au­ [...]em beatitu­ [...]i [...] [...], quae in [...] though they are the best of creatures, yet they are changeable creatures; though they are the most perfect creatures, yet there is somewhat in them of imperfection. Looke upon Angels in their creation, they were created blessed; Blessed (as the Schooles de­termine) with a naturall blessednesse, not with a supernaturall which consists in the vision of God; for, if they had been created in a supernaturall blessednesse, then they had never fallen; they were created only in a naturall blessednesse, and from that they might fall and did. Now, indeed the good Angels have obtained by [Page 139] Christ a supernaturall blessednesse, from▪ which they cannot fall; and so by grace are become immutable, which by creation they were not. Though Christ be not a Redeemer (as was toucht be­fore) yet he is a confirmer, a supporter of the holy Angels. In refe­rence whereunto, Christ is called the head of all things (Eph. 1. 22.) And of him the whole family in Heaven, and in earth is named, Ephes. 3. 15. And by him (Col. 1. 20.) God hath reconciled all things unto himselfe, by him I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in Heaven. Some understand that place in the Co­lossians of men only, because of the word reconciling, yet we may well take in Angels also, because, that place takes in all things, both in Heaven and earth. And howsoever Angels needed not such a re­conciliation, as supposes a breach of peace, or a falling out, before: yet they needed such a reconciliation, as consists in the continuance and strengthning of that peace which was before.

Further, We learne by way of Corollary from the former point, That there is no stability in any estate out of Christ; The Angels themselves could not be trusted out of Christ; folly is in them not considered in Christ, how much more in man? When Adam fell, if God should have repaired him againe, and set him up (in statu quo) in the same condition wherein he was, yea in a better (if a better could be had) without a Mediator; and so have tried his obe­dience once more; or should every particular man have stood for himselfe, and not one for all; certainly, as we fell at first in a lump all together, so we should have all fallen single (as it were) by re­taile, one after another: There is no assurance in any estate on this side Christ: Nor man, nor Angel can hold out without a Surety: Christ is called the Surety of the Covenant, Heb. 7. 22. because he undertakes for us that we shall doe our parts, that we shall be faith­full and beleeving, that we shall be holy and humble, that we shall doe what God expects from those, whom free grace shall save: Christ undertakes for all the grace, and holinesse, and faithfullnesse which is required in beleevers; He gives no command, but what himselfe helps us to fulfill, nor calls he for any duty, but what him­selfe works in us and for us.

Fourthly observe, That God sees imperfection in creatures whose natures are most perfect. Man looking upon the Angelicall nature, or upon mans nature in innocency, could see no fault or fol­ly in either, but God saw both possibly faulty, though not actually faulty. And, as it is with the nature of men and Angels, so with [Page 140] their works: when we can see nothing amisse in a work, God can: as the Apostle acknowledges (1 Cor. 4. 4.) I know nothing by my selfe: I professe, when I looke into the course of my ministery (for he speakes to that particular) when I looke, how I have discharged my Apostleship, my conscience beares me witnesse, I know of no unfaithfulnesse or neglect, but yet, though I know nothing by my selfe, I am not hereby justified, but he that judgeth me is the Lord: as if he should say, wheu God comes to looke over my worke, he may find faults, many faults in it; there is no standing for creatures before God in any creature-purity: Angelicall perfection is imper­fect in his sight. Angels have not the least spot or tincture of sin in their nature, yet the nature of Angels is potentially sinfull. The best creature (in regard of pure naturalls) may be wrought to evill, one God cannot. And the reason is, because every one may erre, who hath not the rule of righteousnesse within him: and therefore it is impossible God should erre, because his own will is the rule of his own actions: He is every way a law unto himselfe. The Apo­stle speaking of the Gentiles (Rom. 2. 14.) saith, These having not the law, are a law unto themselves. Not that their nature is a law, (which is the transcendent priviledge of God) but, that they have the law of nature, or the law printed in their nature, though not published to their eare; They have the law written in their hearts, but the heart of God is his law, both written and unwritten. Crea­tures how perfect soever in their nature, have the will of God for their rule and law: which though it be within them, yet it is not Them, and so they may act beside it. The hand of the Artificer of­ten failes in cutting or fashioning the work he is about, because his hand is not the rule by which he workes: his hand workes by a rule or line, his hand is not that rule or line, therefore he some­times strikes right; and sometimes he strikes wrong; but if the hand of a man were the rule by which he works, then it were im­possible that ever he should worke amisse. Thus it is with God, the very will of God which acts, is the rule by which he acts, hence Solum illum a­ctum à recti­tudine declina re non contin­git, cujus regu­la est ipsa vir­tus agentis. A­quin. par. 1. q. [...]3. art. 1. it is impossible for God to faile; Angels and men act by a rule prescribed, their will is one thing, and the rule is another; the power by which they worke is one thing, and the direction by which they worke is another; and therefore (to shut up this point) the most perfect creature may possibly swerve and erre in acting; Only he cannot erre in any thing he doth, whose will is the perfect rule of all be doth.

Fifthly, Forasmuch as God beholding Angels, sees folly in them, learne, That God hath no need of any creature, no not of Aagels. The reason is clearely this, because Angels themselves in them­selves are unfaithfull, Angels themselves in themselves are foolish, therefore what need hath God of such as these? As King. Achish said (1 King. 21. 15.) when David changed his behaviour be­fore him (studiously acting the foole & mad man) scrabling on the doores of the gate, and letting his spittle fall downe upon his beard: What, saith Achish unto his servants, have I need of madmen, that you have brought this fellow to play the madman in my presence? So, God may say, when he lookes upon the best of creatures, Angels or men, have I any need of mad-men, any need of fooles or of their folly? Forasmuch then, as there is nothing in any creature, barely as a crearure, but what may be reduced to folly and unfaithfull­nesse, and would certainely end there, therefore God hath no need at all of any creature. Men will say, we need not the helpe of disloyall or untrusty men, we need not the helpe of fooles, to coun­sell us, or of unfaithfull ones, to act for us.

Besides, Creatures are no helpe to God: For the truth is, God and the creature, are no more than God alone; I say, God and the ut­most perfection of all creatures put together, are no more than God alone: The reason of it is, because, if there be any perfection in creatures, it is but what God himselfe hath put into them. What a man gives to another, is no addition to himselfe, much lesse is that which God gives man or Angel, any addition to God. God is infi­nite, and no addition can be made to infinite: When the creature doth most for us, the creature (of it selfe) doth nothing for us, God doth all in all & by all. The creature doth you no more good at one time than at another, all the good which is done at any time, God doth it: So then, every way God hath no need of creatures. And it is our comfort, I am sure it ought to be, that he hath not. He saith to wisemen I have no need of your counsels; to rich men I have no need of your purses; and to great men, I have no deed of your power; hee sees all is vanity.

Lastly, If God trust not Angels, let not us trust in man; if he charges his Angels with folly, let not us adore the wisedome of man. This discovery of imperfection in Angels, should lay all creatures low before us, and take us off from confidence or boa­sting in any arme of flesh. To this sense, Eliphaz prosecutes the argument in the following words to the end of the Chapter. [Page 142] If Angels, the chiefest and choicest of creatures be thus weake, what then is man, who dwels in a house of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, and who are crushed before the moth?

JOB. Chap. 4. Vers. 19, 20, 21.

How much lesse on them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foun­dation is in the dust, which are crushed before the moth?

They are destroyed from morning to evening: they perish for ever without any regarding it.

Doth not their excellency which is in them, goe away? they die, even without wisedome.

THese three verses, containe a description of man in oppositi­on to the Angels. The forme of the argument was given be­fore to this effect; That if Angels, those excellent creatures, can­not stand before God, or be justified in his sight; then much lesse man, a weake creature, man who dwels in a house of clay, and whose foundation is in the dust.

Two things this Context holds forth to us, concerning the weaknesse of man, in opposition to Angels.

First, It shewes that man is a materiall substance, so are not An­gels, Angels are spirits, spirituall substances.

Secondly, It shewes us, that man is a mortall substance, so are not Angels, spirits die not.

That, man is a materiall substance, is proved in the beginning of the 19. verse, from those words, He dwels in a house of clay, whose foundation is in the dust.

That, man is a mortall substance, is implied in the former; That which is made of clay and dust, must needes be brittle ware. But besides that his mortality is implied in those words, it is proved expresly and in termes in the words following to the end of the Chapter. And this mortality of man is set forth, by divers ad­juncts or circumstances.

1. By a similitude, shadowing the quicknesse or the suddennesse of mans death, They are crushed before the moth.

2. By the shortnesse of life; They are destroyed from morning to evening.

[Page 143] 3. By the everlasting power, which death hath upon us (respe­cting this world) They perish for ever.

4. By the common and generall insensiblenesse and inconside­ration of this fraile life, of this long lasting death; Man (saith he) is destroyed from morning to evening, he dieth quickly, perisheth for ever, he lies, as long as the world lasts, in his grave, yet such is the stupidity of man, that none regard all this, he dies without any re­garding.

5. And least any should say, surely, man is not such a pitifull creature, as this sad description represents him; man was the most excellent part of the inferior creation, God planted many no­ble endowments upon man: and is there no more to be said of him but this? he is crush'd like a moth, and dies, no man regarding? That objection is taken away in the last verse; as if the Holy Ghost had said, I grant that man, besides dust and clay (which are his materials) hath many heavenly, yea divine endowments, he hath the impressions of Gods Image in reason and understanding stam­ped upon him; but, though he be thus qualified, yet all his excel­lency (all that which may be accounted the choisest and the best in him) will not keepe him sweet, or protect him from death and rottennesse: Doth not (saith he) their excellency which is in them goe away? as if he had said, If you alledge, that man is more than dust and clay, then weaknesse and corruption; tis granted: but what then? Doth not their excellency that is in them, goe away? doth it not vanish, and where is it? and where is he? All naturall perfections (whatsoever man hath under the notion of a reaso­nable creature) be they never so high and raised, quickly passe wither and decay: They have no abiding excellency in them, Doth not their excelleny that is in them, goe away? They have wisdome, but they die without wisedome, even as bruit beasts, either their wis­dome decayes, while they live; or, it is not able to keepe them alive: wisedome, parts, and learning stand them in no stead to prevent death. Now if their excellency goe away, they must goe too; if wisedome cannot keepe them alive, die they must; as we shall see further in opening the severall parts, having thus given the sense in generall.

These things considered, we may see the strength of the Argu­ment in the 19. verse, How much lesse on them who dwell in houses of clay, &c. as if he should say; Forasmuch, as Angels cannot stand in competition with God, or approve themselves in his sight, cer­tainly [Page 144] much lesse can man, how great thoughts soever he hath of himselfe; much lesse can man be justified in his sight, who comes so many degrees short of Angelicall perfections; For, his soule which is within him, though it be a noble and a spirituall substance, and that wherein he is most like to Angels, yet this soule of his, sojournes, dwels and acts, in a body composed of corruptible clay, and hath no better a foundation (in a naturall capacitie) than the very dust; And, so subject is this man to mortality, thus composed of dust and clay, as, what through the inward distempers of his bo­dy, what through outward accidents and casualties, he is as tran­sitory and as subject to death, as the meanest worme, as the poor­est creature in the world, he is crushed before the moth.

How much lesse on them that dwell in houses of clay.

The Hebrew beares a double rendring, either how much lesse, (as we) or how much more: If it be rendred how much lesse, then it referres to the first clause of the former verse; Thus, if he Patricula [...] pro qua est simpliciter [...] hoc loco [...]rum (que) desig nat, sc. vel quanto minus vel quanto ma­gis, Drus. puts no trust in his Angels, then much lesse doth he put trust in men, who dwell in houses of clay. If it be rendred, how much more, then it referres to the latter clause of that verse; Thus, If he charged his Angels with folly, then how much more may he charge them with folly, who dwell in houses of clay? Which words, are a description of man, either in his civill condition, or in his naturall constitution. Some take these words in the very letter, The house, for that which we ordinarily call a house, the house wherein man ordinarily inhabits; as if Eliphaz had thus said, Angels dwell in Heaven, they have everlasting mansions, but man, dwels in a house of clay, the best and goodliest houses are but clay and dust, a little refined and sublimated by art or na­ture, brick and stone, all these materials, or but dirt concocted by the heate of fire and Sunne; so that, if the allusion were to the very houses in which man-kind dwels, in oppsition to the ha­bitation of Angels, these set them farre inferiour to, and below the Angels. As, these take it for the house wherein man lives, so some understand it, of the house, where man lyes being dead, namely the grave: The Chaldee is expresse paraphrasing thus, How much more the wicked, who dwell in a sepulcher of clay? That, the grave is called a house, the Prophet helps us. Isa. 14. 18, 19. All the Kings of the Nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house, that is, in the grave, as the next [Page 145] words prove, But thou art cast out of thy grave, &c. But I ra­ther take it (as was before intimated) to be an expression of mans naturall constitution, He dwels in a house of clay, whose foun­dation is in the dust. And so the Apostle is expresse (2 Cor. 5. 1.) If our earthly house of this Tabernacle were dissolved; the earthly house is the body; and (2 Cor. 4. 7.) the body is called an earthen vessel, We have this treasure▪ (namely the precious Pro­mises [...] Turbidus, lutu­tentus, mixtus, ut cum aquae turbantur & in eis lutum itae commevetur, ut confundan­tur & luto miscentur, ut in cementum de­generent. and truths of God in the dispensation of the Gospel) in earthen vessels: We dying men, preach eternall life; we have death in our faces, while the word of life is in our mouths. The word here used, signifies clay, either wrought or unwrought, ei­ther naturall slimy dirt, or dirt made up for use, by art: So Gen. 11. 3. when they attempted the building of that Tower, it is said, They had slime for morter; it is the word of the Text, which is used for both slime and morter; they had slime (which is natural) for morter; that is (by Art and industry) they made morter of slime: The body of man is a house of clay, but not of rude na­turall clay; the power, and (if I may so speak) the art of God hath wrought it beyond it self, and refined it for this goodly buil­ding, the body of man.

The body of man is called a house or building in two respects. First, because of the comely fabrick: it is set up by line or by rule, there is admirable architecture, admirable skill in building and raising up of the body of man, story after story, room after room, and contrivance after contrivance, in all so compact and set toge­ther, that the most curious piles in the world are but rude heaps compared to it; so then in respect of the frame and structure, it is fitly called a house.

Secondly, Hoc corpus lu­teum domus a­nimae dicitur, quia anima hu­mana quantum ad aliquid est in corpore sicut homo in domo, vel sicut nanta in navi, in quā ­tum scilicet est motor corporis; anima a utem non unitur cor­pori accidenta­liter sed forma­liter, ut forma materiae, dici­tur enim mate­ria fundamen­tum formae, eò quod est pri­ma pars in ge­neratione, sunt fundamen [...]um in constitutio­ne domus. Aquin. the frame of the body is called a house, in respect of the soul; the soul dwels in or inhabits the body, as the whole man inhabits or dwels in a house; the soule guides and orders the body, as the inhabitant orders the affairs of the house, or as the Ma­riner and Pilot steer and direct the motions of the ship: Not that the soul is in the body accidentally (we must not strain the similitude so far) as a man is in a house, or a Mariner is in a ship: there is a formall union between the body and the soul; only the soul is said to dwell in the body, and the body or the matter is after called a foundation, because there is the beginning. Man was begun at his body, as the house is at the foundation: first God formed man (that is the body) out of the dust of the earth, and then he breathed [Page 146] into him the breath of life, and man became a living soule.

Thus the body is a house, and it is a house of clay, or a house of Co [...]pus huma­num lutum di­gitur, quod ex te [...]ra & aqua gravioribus clementis▪ abun­dantius constat. Aquin. earth, so called, chiefly in two respects.

First, because of the matter of it, it is made of earth. Though all Elements (as Naturalists teach) meet in mixt bodies, yet earth is predominant in grosse or heavie bodies.

Secondly, because of the continuance of it, or the means by which it is supported: for, as it was at the first framed out of the earth, so it is still supported and maintained by earth; earthly crea­tures, meat and drink with such like accomodations, continue and repair this house from day to day, untill at last it be laid down in the dust, and returne to earth again. So then, it is called an earthly house, not only from the matter of which it is made, but also from the means by which it is kept in repair, earth and earthy all.

Whose foundation is in the dust.

These words aggravate the weakness of mans condition. Suppose man were formed out of the dust and were but clay, yet, had he a strong foundation, that would support and strengthen him. The strength of a building is in the foundation, and that building whose wals are but weak may stand long, being firmely founded. The Church of Christ is weak of it self; but because the Church hath [...] Pulvis prop [...]ie rarior & tenui­nat, qualis in superfi [...]ie terrae, Me [...]. in Gen. Significa [...] non simplici [...]ur pul­verem, sed pul­ve [...]ē canosum [...] l [...]mosum Fa­pius in Gen. 2. 7 Pulvis levissi­mus ex quo ni­hil firmum aut diuturnum om­pingi potest. such a mighty foundation, CHRIST the Rock, a living and an unmoveable Rock: (That confession of Peter, Thou art Christ the Sonne of the living God, is the Churches foundation Rock) therefore the gates of Hell shall not prevaile against it. But when the building is weak, and the foundation weak too, in how totte­ring a condition is such a building? Mans foundation is but sand or dust: and the word signifies flying, light, unstable, moveable dust, such as lies on the surface of the earth, and is plaid about with every puffe of winde, though some (I confesse) take the word not strict­ly, for this flying dust, but for slimy dust, or dust moistned, which is slime. This was the matter out of which God created man (Gen. 2. 7.) dust out of the earth, or out of the dust of the earth. That dust which can hardly be collected or kept together to make a subsist­ence, that is laid together as the foundation of man, His foundati­on is in the dust.

Hence we may observe first, what the pedigree and originall of man is what treasure soever he carries about him, yet he is an earth­en vessell, or as the Apostle speaks of the first man, 1. Cor. 15. 47. [Page 147] he is of the earth earthy, Earth is the Originall of man, and man himself is no better, Earthy; yea, the Earth is call'd his earth, as if he had propriety in nothing but earth, Psal. 1 [...]. 6. 4. speaking of the greatest Princes, Trust ye not in Princes, nor in the sonne of man, his breath goeth forth, and he returneth to his earth. Our bodies can challenge no alliance with, or propriety in any thing but earth, it is our earth. The wise man (Eccles. 12. 7.) cals the bo­dy, not only an Allie to the dust, or a-kin to dust, but plain dust, Then (speaking of Death) shall the dust returne to the earth as it was? it came from the earth, and in death it returnes to the same point from whence it set out.

A second thing we may take notice of from mans originall, which exceedingly advances the infinite wisdome, and the Al­mighty power of God. Dust and Earth are the matter out of which we are formed. But doth the countenance of man repre­sent dust and earth? Could any one say, who had nothing to judge by, but the eye, that man was made of such mean materials? What characters of Beauty and Majesty sit in his visage? how unlike is he to his own parent, the Earth? Man hath received from God, not only an excellent fabrick or composure of body, but if you consider it, the very matter of which the body is composed, is farre more excellent then earth or dust. Take a piece of earth, or a handfull of dust, and compare them with the flesh of man, that flesh is earth indeed, but that flesh is farre better then meer earth. This shewes the power of the Creator, infinitely exceeding the power of a crea­ture. A Goldsmith can make you a goodly Jewel, but then you must give him gold and precious stones of which to make it; he can put the matter into a hetter form, but he cannot make the matter better. The Engraver can make a curious Statue, exactly limb'd, and proportion'd to the life, out of a ruff piece, but the matter must be the same you put into his hands; if you give him Marble, it will be a Marble Statue, but he cannot mend the matter. Mans work Materiam su­perabat opus. often exceeds his matter, but mans work cannot make the matter exceed it self. Now God took up a rude lumpe of earth, or subtile dust, and he not only put that into an excellent form, but he men­ded the matter also. Man is earth, but he is earth sublimated and refined; Not only doth the forme exceed the matter, but the mat­ter formed exceeds the matter unformed.

Thirdly, as this lifts up the wisdome and power of God, so it should humble and lay man low. Eliphaz improves this principle as [Page 148] an Argument to take down the spirit of Job from his supposed heights and self-conceits. Surely thou art great in thy owne thoughts, when thou presumest to enter a contest with God: But, look to thy Originall; such towring, lofty, and ascending thoughts would quickly be abated, if thou wouldest remember tha thou art but a clod of earth, a little refined clay, moving slime, enlivened dust, breathing ashes; did we spiritually look upon the matter of our bodies, it would take down the swelling of our spirits; when our spirits are like Jordan in the time of harvest, overflowing all the banks of humility and moderation, this thought spiritualiz'd will bring us into our channels again, and recall us to our owne bounds and banks. Some Naturalists observe of the Bees, that when they are up and angry, do but throw a little dust upon them, they are quiet and hive again. Certainly, when our imaginations are buzzing and humming in the aire, when thy are flying and mounting up to Heaven, not in holy aspirings to God (which we ever ought) but in bold aspirings against God, which we should never dare, in such a distemper of our spirits, if we could but cast this dust upon them, it would quiet and bring them in again.

Hath not man cause to lye as low in his thoughts, as that from whence he was extracted? should not he be humbled to the dust, who is dust? Especially, this earth should be abased in all addresses to Heaven, in all our approaches unto God, as Abraham, Genesis 18. 27. I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, who am but dust and ashes. We should never be so low in our own thoughts, as when we make use of our highest priviledges; and the nearer we are admitted to come to Heaven, the more should we (for the magnifying of Free-grace, which makes this admission) remember that we are but Earth.

Fourthly, if the body be but clay, and hath but a foundation of dust, then doe not bestow too much care and cost upon your clay, upon your dust. How many are there who bestow much paines to trim up a vile body, and neglect a precious soule? Most usually they who bestow most paines upon this mortall house of clay, be­stow least about that immortal inhabitant. In an over cared for bo­dy, there ever dwels a neglected soul. You shall have a body clean­ly washed, and a soule all filth; a body neatly clothed and drest, with a soule all naked and unready; a body fed, and a soule star­ved; a body full of the creature, and a soule empty of Christ; these are poor soules indeed. That complaint of the Moralist against [Page 149] Heathens, may be renewed against some Christians, they are busi­ed most between the combe and the glasse, and troubled more at a disorder in their haire, then at a disorder in the Common-wealth Inter' pectinem & speculum occupari. Sen. (he said, I say) then at a disorder in the Church, or in their owne hearts. It is a sad thing, that any who bear the name of a Christi­an, should spend much time betweene the combe and the glasse, and but little betweene Ordinance and Ordinance, betweene the Bi­ble and the Pulpit, betweene reading and hearing, betweene both, and holy meditation; the body is but a house of clay, it is but dust, therefore be not so industrious for it. We usually laugh at children when they are making Houses of Clay, and Pies of Dirt. They whose care is thus over active for the body, are but children of a greater stature, and shew, they have so much more folly in their hearts then they, by how much they have more years over their heads, and are foolish about more serious matters then they. There is no child to the old child.

Fifthly, seeing this house of clay is founded also in dust, observe, that man is a very fraile, an unsteady, and an unstable creature, every puffe must needs subject him to ruine. Look upon his foun­dation, it is nothing but dust. When CHRIST (Math. 7. ult.) had finished his Sermon upon the Mount, he compares his hearers to such as build either upon the Rock, or upon the Sand, they that heare and doe not, are like a house built upon the sand; and what be­comes of that house? when the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, that house fell, and the fall thereof was great. A foundation of dust or sand cannot stand out one storme. The house of mans body is walled and roofed with clay, and bot­tom'd upon no better then dust; the strength of the Church (as was toucht before) is described by the matter of its foundation A Rock, Matth. 16. And the new Jerusalem (which as it is conceived to be the most pure state of the Church here on earth, so it must be the strongest) is set forth having twelve foundations, and they all of stone, and all those stones most precious, and therefore most dura­ble, Rev. 21. 19. The strength and stability of that estate which the Saints shall inherit, when these houses of earth are by death level­led to the earth (the stability (I say) of that estate) is described un­der the notion of a City which hath foundations (Heb. 11. 10.) He (namely Abraham) looked for a City which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God. When the Holy Ghost saith foun­dations, who can tell how many they may be? we can easily tell [Page 150] the fewest they can be; two is the lowest number; so that at least this City hath a foundation upon a foundation. The foundation of Christs perfect righteousnesse is laid upon the foundation of Gods eternall free love: here is foundation upon foundation. The City a­bove hath these foundations, and therefore we receive a City that cannot be shaken. I note these things, to shew by consent of Scrip­ture, that the stability of any condition in allusion to a building is exprest by the strength of its foundation Now, all our outward glo­ry and excellency, our life, and all the pompe of it, hath scarce so much as deserves to be called a foundation; a foundation of dust hath only the name of a foundation. That Image in Daniel which typed out all the descents of worldly greatnesse, had a head of gold, the breast and armes of Silver, the thighes of Brasse, and the legs of Iron, but the feet were part of Iron and part of Clay. The feet are the foundation, and the feet of this Image speak thus much to all the world, that all worldly pompe & greatnesse, all worldly power and majesty must fall, for the image stands upon clay; and though it have a mixture of iron in the feet which is strong, yet it shall not stand by the iron which is strong, but fall and be broken by the clay which is weak. As it was in those great Monarchies, into which the outward power of Nations and Kingdomes was contra­cted: so if you look upon any particular man, though you may conceive him to have a head of gold, armes and breast of silver, thighes of brasse, and legs of iron, yet when you come to the feet, the foundation of the whole body, it is but dust, which a small storm will dissipate and blow away, The body of man hath so weak a foundation, that it is sometime compared to that which hath no foundation, a Tabernacle, (1 Cor. 5.) If the earthly house of this Tabernacle were dissolved, saith the Apostle. Now a Tabernacle hath a roofe or a covering, but no foundation: The Tabernacle of Tectum habet, fundamentum non habet. the body hath a covering, but hardly any foundation, only a foun­dation in the dust.

Lastly, Consider the forme of speaking in this Scripture, How much lesse on them, who dwell in houses of clay? He speakes of the whole man, as dwelling in a house of clay; Now we know that a body cannot properly be said to dwell in abody, the house doth not dwell in a house; yet he speakes, as of a compleat person dwelling in a house of clay, which yet is to be understood of one part of the person, The soule; that dwels in a house of clay, that is, it acts and officiates in a body composed of clay. Hence observe, seeing [Page 151] the whole man commeth under the notion of the soule;

That the soule of man is The man, The soule goes away with the Non qued ani­ma si [...] bono ut quidam posu­erunt, dicentes hominem nihil aliud esse quàm animam indu­tam corpore, sed quia anima est principa­tior pars homi­nis, unum quod­ (que) autem consu­evit appellari id, qu [...]d est in eo principalius. Aquin. in loc. name of the whole person: The soule is not the man in a naturall consideration, (as some have philosophiz'd, asserting that man is nothing but a soule cloathed with a body) for, man is man by the union of soule and body, and the perfection of man as man, con­sists in that union; but the soule is the man in a morall considera­tion, because it is the more noble and excellent part of man: and it is usuall to denominate the whole from that part which is more excellent. The body is but as the Cabinet, the soule is the Jewell; the body is but as the sheath or the scabbard, the soule is as the knife or the sword; You know when a man buyeth a sword, he buyes a scabbard too, or when he buyes a knife, he buyes the sheath too, yet he saith, this knife cost me so much, or I gave so much for this sword he makes no mention of the scabbard or of the sheath; now the body is the sheath or scabbard of the soule (Dan. 7. 15.) you have it exprest so, I was grieved (saith the Prophet) in my spirit in the middest of my body, so we translate it, but the Chaldee is (and so we have it in some Margents) in the middest of my sheath; The soule is the blade, a blade of admirable mettle and temper; the body how beautifull soever by nature, or gay by art is but a velvet, or an embossed sheath and scabbard: therefore at first, when God formed man out of the dust of the earth, and had breathed into him the breath of life, the result of all is, and man became a living soule; it is not said, man became a living body, though life was breathed into the body, and the body stood up and lived, yet the best part is named for all, the dust and the clay are (as it were) quite forgotten in the story, man became a living soule. And that may be a reason, why the fear of God and kee­ping [...] his Commandements (Eccles. 12. ult) is called all man, because these things chiefely concerne that part of man, which (up­on the matter) is all man. The feare of God and keeping his Com­mandements, are soule worke, and tend to the eternall welfare of the soule; and though the body shares in all the blessings, and as­sists in most labours of the soule, yet the soule labours most for, and is the chiefest seate of blessednesse. How strangely have some departed from this point of truth, which the Scripture every where writes as with a Sun-beame: who instead of making the soule to be the chiefe part of man, deny that man hath any such part And whereas some (toucht at before) err'd on the right hand, saying, [Page 152] that Man was nothing but a soule: These goe astray more, and more dangerously on the left hand, saying that Man hath no soule at all: An opinion, howsoever lately drest in some finenesse of wit, and subtilties of Philosophy, yet in it self so grosse, so disho­nourable to man, so contrary to this Text, and the whole tenour of the word of God, that I hope it is very mortal, and will shortly find a grave in every heart, but theirs, who have more reason to wish it, then to maintain it. I intend no dispute about it, beyond the Argument before me, which if it be not demonstrative (as many others from Scripture are) yet it carries (at least) a faire probability, and an ingenuous ground; for how can man be said to dwell in a house of clay, if he himself be nothing else but a house of clay? or how can the inhabitant and the house be in all, but one and the same?

But I shall dwell too long upon these houses of clay, in which man cannot dwell long: for it followes:

Which are crushed before the moth.

What strength is there in houses which are crushed before the moth? or as others read it Which shall be consumed after the man­ner of a moth? Master Broughton thus, Beaten to powder as a [...] Ad facies ti­neae, [...], in me­dum tineae. Sept. Velut à tinea. Vulg. Pagnine. moth be they: That is, They are crushed as soon, or as speedi­ly as a moth. Another, They are consumed as it were with a moth. A fifth translates differently from all these, Which are crushed and consumed before Arcturus. Arcturus is a Constellation in Heaven about the North Pole; we read of it in the 9th of this Book of Job, verse 9. Which makes Arcturus, Orion, and the Pleiades, &c. The same word here, signifies a moth, and sometimes a Constel­lation, a knot or company of Stars: The sense of this reading is made out thus, They are crushed before the face of Arcturus. That is, they are crushed as long, or whilst Arcturus doth con­tinue; in plain English, as long as there is a Star in Heaven, man will be a mortall man; or man will never change this con­dition of mortality, while the world stands. We may thus expound it, by that (Psal. 72. 17.) where the Prophet describing the Kingdome of Christ in the extent both of place and time, saith, His name shall be continued as long as the Sun; the Hebrew is, [...] Ad facies solu. His name shall continue before the face of the Sun; to continue before the face of the Sun, is to run in a line of equall conti­nuance with the Sun; so here, They are crushed before the fate [Page 153] of those Starres, that is, they shall be in such a crushing perish­ing condition as long as those Starres continue, which is, as long as the course of this world continues. Our owne translation which comes cleer to the letter of the Originall, is further to be looked into. They are crushed before the moth. It may have a three-fold interpretation, First, before the moth, that is, before in time, or sooner then the moth. How quickly is a moth crush­ed? man may be crushed before it, sooner then it is crusht. Se­condly, Before the moth, may be as much, as, in the presence of the moth; as if he should say, man thinks he is able to stand it out against a potent Adversary, yea against God himselfe; but alasse poore creature, he is not able to stand before a moth, or contend with a flye, if God arme any of them against him. Thirdly, They are crushed before the moth, that is, man is crusht and torne, vext and worne out by a thousand miseries and troubles which attend his life, before ever the moth has to doe with him, before ever he lyes downe in the bed of death, before the moth, that is, for the moth to fret on, or as a companion for the wormes.

All these renderings, though they differ in words, come neer and meet in the same generall sense, namely, An illustration of mans frailty. Take them first by way of similitude, Man is crushed as it were with a moth, it notes thus much to us, That death con­sumes us without noise, secretly and silently: To doe a thing as a moth, is to doe it silently and without noise. Hos. 5. 12. God himselfe saith, that he will be as a moth unto Ephraim, and as a Lion, ver. 14. when he saith he will be as a Lion, it implieth open judgements, which come violently and visibly, which come in, like thunder, roaring as a Lion upon them; But when he saith, I will be as a moth unto Ephraim, the meaning is, I will send silent and secret judgements upon you, which shall eate out your strength, corrode your power, and blemish the beauty of your garments, and you shall not perceive it; Ye shall be undone, consumed, and (as we speak Proverbially) ye shall never know who hurt you. The open enemies of the Church are threatned with secret judgements, under this notion of a moth, Isa. 50. 9. Loe they shall wax old as doth a garment, the moth shall consume them. Againe, Chap. 51. 6, 7. Feare ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. For the moth shall eate them up like a garment, and the worme shall eate them like wool: that is, whereas, your enemies have made a great noise and clamour with their revilings [Page 154] against you; I will come against them without noise, they shall perish with as little clamour as a garment doth, that is eaten with moths. And thus the life of man is ordinarily consumed (as it were) by a moth; sicknesses and diseases enter secretly, into his house of clay, they lye in the frame and between the rafters of this house, sucking up the spirits, and wasting the strength, spending the heate, and drinking up the naturall moisture of the body; we know not how we consume, but we consume; we know not how we de­cline, but we decline; we dye, we know not how, but we dye: Is it not then as with a moth, creeping upon us, yea feeding upon us without noise?

Againe, Take it by way of similitude, not as before actively or instrumentally, they are crushed as by a moth, or as a moth crushes; but passively or subjectively; They are crushed as a moth, that is, they are crushed as a moth is crushed, alluding to the easinesse of crushing a moth; A moth is dust as soone as you crush it the least touch kills it; Man in his house of clay is so weake, that if God doe but touch him, he dies and falls to dust; the Lord needs not bring his great Artillery, and make batteries against the body of man: the body of man is no such strong Fort or Bulwarke to stand out a long siege, or endure much assaulting and opposition; he is crushed as a moth betweene your fingers; Hence David most humbly deprecates the stroake of God, which he saw comming, or felt as come, because he was not able to beare it; Psal. 39. 10. Remove thy stroake away from me, I am consumed by the blow of thine hand, (Lord if thou strike me thus I shall quickly consume) And least you should think that Davids flesh (he being a King) was tender and delicate, and so lesse able to beare any hardship, therefore in the following words, he puts the case in generall con­cerning man or man-kind, Take the man whose strength is as the strength of stones, and his flesh as brasse; yet this man breakes and vanishes under the hand of God, so he affirmes, ver. 11. under this passive consideration of a moth, When thou with rebukes doest correct man for iniquity, thou makes his beauty to consume away like a moth (And then closes with that common axiome of mans mortality) surely every man is vanity, Selah.

Further, Man may well be said to be crushed or die even as a moth, for as the garment breeds the moth, and then the moth eates the garment; so (besides that power of God, or the out­ward stroake of his hand, of which David spake) mans own [Page 155] distempered body breeds ill humours they diseases, and these breed death: As it was with Jonas gourd, so it is with us, we give life and suck to a worme in our own roots, which sucks out our life, causing our leaves to fall, and our goodly branches suddenly to wither.

Thirdly, From that sense, he is crushed before Arcturus, or as long as the Starres continue, Observe;

That, as mans state is fraile and weake, so it will be, the for ever of this world. Doe not looke that ever there shall rise up a gene­ration of men, that shall have better houses then houses of clay, or houses stronger built then our present buildings. As we are risen up in our fathers stead, a generation of sinfull men; so we are risen up in our fathers stead, a generation of weake mortall men: and our children will arise in the stead of us their fathers, a generation of men, as mortall as we their fathers. Till the whole compages and course of nature be changed, man shall not exchange the infirmity of his nature, He shall never be without crushing sicknesses, till he is above them.

The sad story of man holds on still, and growes yet more sad, before it was crushing, now it is destroying.

Verse 20. They are destroyed from morning to evening, they perish for ever without any regarding it.

We may understand the former verse of naturall death, and this of casuall and violent death. Destuction and perishing, import violence; Though I conceive naturall death be here also intended. They are destroyed from morning to evening, they pe­rish for ever without any regarding it, or as Mr. Broughton reads it between a morning and evening, they are wasted without any regarding, or without any thinking upon it.

They are destroyed, that is, they are subject or liable to destru­ction: A mane ad ve­speram, i. e. per torum diem, qu [...]ppe mane & vespera sunt pa [...]tes diei Drus. That phrase from morning to evening, notes the whole day; it is as much as to say, they are destroyed continually or all the day long, as the Apostle speaks out of the Psalme, Rom. 8. 36. For thy sake are we killed all the day long: The morning and the evening are the parts of a naturall day, Gen. 1. 5. or the two termes of a civill day, & these include and take in the full compasse of the day.

This sense teacheth us, That man is destroyable every moment. He wasts in one sense, while he growes, and dies from the mor­ning of his birth and comming into the world, to the evening of his returne and going out of the world: And not only so, but he [Page 156] is obnoxious to the violent assaults of death every day, and all houres of every day: From the morning when he rises, to the evening when he goes to bed, he walkes among armies of dan­gers, and within the Gunshot of destruction. The Apostles ca­talogue of perils is true to this day. 2 Cor. 11. 26. In perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of mine own countrymen, in perils by the Heathen, in perils in the City, in perils in the wildernesse, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren: Every place is a peril, and every person a peril. Where can we goe, with whom can we meete, and not goe among or meete with perils? And doe not all these perils speake destruction from morning to evening? Pauls experiences, both in regard of a natural, but especially of violent death, brought forth these conclusions, which come full up to the point. I die daily, (1 Cor. 15 31.) in deaths often (2 Cor. 11. 23.) we are killed all the day long, (Rom. 8. 36.)

Secondly, Take the words as a proverbiall speech, by which the shortest time is signified. As (Isa. 38. 12.) Hezekiah com­playning, sets forth his mortall sicknesse, threatning present death and cutting off, thus; Mine age is departed and removed from me as a sheapheards tent; I have cut off like a weaver my life, he will cut me off with pining sicknesse, from day even to night wilt thou make an end of me, that is, either continually or sud­denly: from day even to night wilt thou make an end of me, I am wasting perpetually: or before night, within the compasse of this day thou wilt destroy and make an end of me; these were the thoughts of my heart, when I was in the hands of that acute dispatching disease. The Psalmist, (Psal. 90. 5, 6,) describes man as grasse, in the morning it flourisheth and groweth up, in the evening it is cut downe and withereth; that is, man con­tinueth but a very short time. His life is but a spanne long, or but a day long. Jonahs Gourd came up in a night, and perished in a night; and man commeth up in the morning, and perisheth in the evening. The Naturalists speake of a Fly they call Ephemeron, a creature of one day, which comes forth in the morning, is very active about noone▪ but when the Sunne declineth, it declines too, and sets, with the set­ting of the Sunne. Man is an Ephemeron, a creature of one day; for howsoever his life consisteth of many dayes, & is often lengthe­ned out to many yeares, yet betweene morning and evening, or from morning to evening he is destroyed. The first step he sets up­on [Page 157] the stage of the world, is a going out of the world; his ascend­ing to the height of his natural perfection, hath in it a decent. One part of his life compared with another, is an increase, but the whole in reference to his end, is a decrease: his life is but a breathing death, life shortning as fast as it lengthns, his life is death hast­ning upon him continually. A hand breadth is quickly measured: Behold (saith David Psal. 29. 5.) thou hast made my dayes an hand breadth; nothing needs no time to passe it in; mans age in it self is but little, and comparatively it is nothing; it fals under no calcula­tion before the face of Eternity. Mine age is nothing before thee.

But though the life of man be thus short, and himself be destroy­ed between a morning and an evening, yet death lasts long, they perish for ever without any regarding.

They perish for ever] Death it seemes is everlasting. They pe­rish the word is often used in this book for the dissolution of soule and body, not for the annihilation of either, as perishing properly imports: to perish, is here but to dye, for thus even the righteous perish, and no man layes it to heart. Isay 57. 1.

But doth man perish thus, dyes he for ever? shall there not be a [...]. returne, a resurrection, shall not soule and body be reunited? how is it said then, they perish or dye for ever?

For ever, is some time put for an infinite time, and some time for an indefinite time, 1 Chron. 23. 25 The Lord God of Israel hath given rest unto his people, that they may dwell in Jerusalem for ever. And yet the Jewes are now so farre from dwelling in Jeru­salem, that they have scarce rest or dwelling among any people. The like sense of for ever, reade 1 Kings 2. 33. Psal. 132. 12, 14. Yet further, for ever is put for the finite time of one mans life, 1 Sam. 27. 12. He shall be my servant for ever, that is, as long as he lives. Psal. 23. 6. I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever, that is, as long as I live. In the text before us, for ever, is as long as this world lasts; it notes the utmost terme of time, not (which is without terme) eternity. They perish for ever, that is, they shall not live in this world any more; as (Job 14. 14.) If a man dye shall he live again? As if he had said, man can dye but once; he cannot live againe, that is, in this world; shall he any more re­turn to his house, to his wife and children to his riches or honours, and, shall he here againe enjoy such an estate as he had before? That (Psal. 103. 16.) explains it so, As for man his days are as grass, as a flower of the field so he flourisheth, for the winde passeth over [Page 158] it and it is gone, and the place thereof shall know it no more, that is, he shall never returne to that locall place, or civill place in which he lived; he shall not return to that place of magistracy or mini­strey, to that place of merchandizing or trading, of husbandry or handicraft, where he convers'd before. Thus his place will know him no more. Man dyes but once, and therefore when he dies, he is said to dye for ever. There is a second death, but it is only a se­cond condition of life. Some shall so live for ever, that they shall be dying for ever. The misery of all men here, is, that they are dying while they live; the misery of the damned hereafter, will be, that they are living while they dye. We see then, that as life is a conti­nuall going out of the world, so from death there is no returning to the world, they perish for ever: when once you die, you are dead for good and all (as we say) there's an end, in respect of any work pro­per to this world, whether naturall, civill, or spirituall. A dying man perishes for ever from eating and drinking, from any outward content or pleasure. When Barzillai was (as it were but) upon the borders of death and confines of the grave (2 Sam. 19. 25.) he bespeaks David thus, who had invited him to Court, Can I taste what I eat and what I drink? (and it followes) Can I any more heare the voice of singing-men and singing-women? Can I any more? as if he had said, I am now nigh unto death, these delights are gone they are perished for ever, I can hardly taste any thing I eat or drink; the pleasant Voice or musicall Instrument can I any more hear? much more then in death it self are all these outward comforts perished, and will perish for ever.

Againe, in respect of civill works, he that dyes, perishes for ever; no more buying, or selling, or trading, or de aling, all these things are past, and past for ever. Yea, death puts an end to all spi­rituall workes, such as were the Saints exercise and duty upon the earth, at the grave, there's an end of them also; a dying man perishes for ever, in respect of repenting or believing, in respect of praying or hearing the word. These are heavenly works, but the time for these is, while you are upon the earth, none of these labours are in Heaven or Hell, no nor in the grave whether thou goest, as the Preacher concludes (Ecclesiastes 9. 10.) Therefore (Isay 38. 18.) Hezekiah in his sickness makes it one part of his suit to God, that he might be spared, for (saith he) the grave cannot praise thee, they that go downe into the pit cannot hope for thy truth, the living, the living he shall praise thee, as I do this day. To praise [Page 159] God shall be the work of Saints for ever; and yet the Saints dying are truly said perish for ever, from praising God. All that praise shall cease in death, which belong to the wayes of grace; and then such praise begins as suits with glory, which is our end. That He­zekiah means it of such praise, and not of all praise, is cleare from his own words, Verse 20. We will sing my song to the stringed in­struments, all the dayes of my life in the house of the Lord, that is, in the ordinances of thy publick worship. They that are in the house of the grave, cannot praise the Lord in his house. And though the praises of the Lord in Heaven, are transcendent, and more per­fect then those in his house on Earth; yet it is a higher act of grace to desire to live to praise God, then to be willing to dye that we may praise him; because in this we deny our selves most; Pray­sing God on earth is a work as well as a reward, but praising God in Heaven is a reward rather then a work. And we put forth the most spirituall acts of grace, when we cheerfully goe on with a work, which we know stands betweene us and the best part of our reward. But I returne to the Text.

They perish for ever without any regarding,] or without any laying it to heart. The word heart is not in the mouth, but, it is in the heart of this Scripture. For the sense is paralell with that, Esay [...] Abs (que) apponen­te. Pereunt eoquòd nemo opponat eis medicinam. 57. The righteous perish, and no man layes it to heart, The Chal­dee gives a strange glosse, They perish or dye because no man gi­veth them medicine; as if he had said, there is no Physitian can give an Antidote against death, or by any medicines prolong mans life. It is a truth, that the decayes and ruines of Nature, will at last exceed the repairs of Art; but this glosse hath little regard to the text, which we translate well, They perish without any regarding it, that is, none or very few regarding it. The negative is not ab­solutely universall, excluding all, as if there were none in the world who take notice of the shortnesse and frailty of mans life, or of his for ever perishing condition. So in that place of Isaiah, the righ­teous perish and no man layes it to heart; that is, there are very few, scarce any to be found who lay to heart (in comparison of the number which neglect) the death of righteous men.

Observe hence, Few of the living regard how suddenly others do, or themselves may dye. Till we see a friend gasping and dying, till we see him bedewed with cold sweats, and rackt with Convul­sions, till our eye thus affects our hearts, our hearts are seldome af­fected with the sense of our mortality. It is one reason why Solo­mon [Page 160] advises to go to the house of mourning, Eccles. 7. It is better to goe to the house of mourning, then to the house of mirth, for (saith he) that is the way of all men (all must dye) and the living will lay it to heart, or the living will regard it. As if he had said, the living seldom lay death to heart, till they come to the house of death: He seems to promise for the living, that then they wil: yet his undertaking is not so strict, as if every man that goes to the house of mourning did certainly lay it to heart: but he speaks probably, that if living man will at any time lay death to heart, then surely he will when he goes to the house of mourning. When will a man think of death, if not when he sees death? and looks into that dark chamber of the grave? There are many who lay it to heart only then: for a fit at a Funerall, they have a passion of the heart about mortality. And very many have gone so often to the house of mourning, that they are growne familiar with death, and the fre­quency of those meetings take off all impressions of mortality from their hearts. As we say of those Birds that build & roost in steeples, being used to the continuall ringing of the bels, the sound disquiets them not: or as those that dwel near the fall of the river Nylus, the noise of the water deafens them so, that they minde it not. Many have been so often at the grave, that now the grave is worn out of their hearts; they look upon it as a matter of custome and forma­lity for men to dye and be buried, and when the solemnity of death is over, the thoughts of death are over: as soone as the grave is out of their sight, preparations for the grave are out of mind. It is sto­ried (2 Sam. 20. 12.) that when Amasa was slain by Joab, and lay wallowing in his blood in the midst of the high way, every one that came by him stood still, but anon Amasa is removed out of the high way into the field, & a cloth cast upon him, & then (the text saith) all the people went on after Joab. It is so still, we make a stop at one that lyes gasping and groaning, at one that lyes bleeding and dying, but let a cloth be throwne over him and he draw aside, put into the grave, and covered with earth, then we goe to our businesse, to trading and dealing, yea to coveting and sinning, as if the last man (that ever should be) were buried. Thus, men perish for ever, without any regarding. If this kinde of perishing were more re­garded, or regarded by more, fewer would perish. Thoughts of death spiritualliz'd have life in them: thoughts of death laid to the heart, are a good medicine for an evil heart. It followes,

[Page 161] Verse 21. Doth not their excellency which is in them go away? they dye, even without wisdome.

This Verse (as I noted in the begining) prevents an objection which might be made, as if man had wrong done him: and that it were too great a diminution to his honour, whom God made the chief creature in the inferiour world, and but little inferiour to An­gels themselves, that he should be looked upon only as a heape of dust, or a lumpe of clay, as a mortall, momentany perishing crea­ture; therefore he grants that man hath an excellency; but all the excellency that he hath, whether naturall or artificiall, bred in him, or acquired by him, as a man, when he goes, goes too, Doth not their excellency which is in them go away? or journieth not their excellency with them? as Mr. Broughton translates, alluding to our passing out of the world, as in a journey; when a man dies he takes a journey out of the world, he goes out for ever; and (saith he) doth not his excellency journey along with him? yes, the que­stion affirmes it, when man goes, his excellency goes too. The word (Jether) which we translate excellency, signifies primarily, a residue or a remaine, and that two ways. First, a residue of persons, Judges 7. 6. But all the rest of the people bowed downe on their knees to drink water. So the vulgar understands it here. They who are left after them, shall be taken away from them: namely their heirs or posterity. Secondly, it signifies a residue of things, Ps. 17. 14. where describing worldly men who have their portion in this life, he saith, their bellies are fill'd with hid treasure, they are al­so full of children, and leave the rest of their substance to their babes. Thus others take it here. Doth not the wealth and riches which men leave when they dye, dye also and go away, as their persons are mortall, so are their estates; there is a moth will eat both. And Iather, quod est superesse non solum excessum quantitatis sig­nificat, sed eti­am qualitatis dignitatis, ficut verbum latinū supero non so­lum superesse, sed etiam vin­ce [...]e & excel­lere. Pined. [...] as the word signifies a quantitive remainder, or overplus, both of persons and things, so also a qualitative excesse or remainder: or that which exceeds in quality: any excesse in the goodnesse of a quality, is called excellency. Thus Jacob cals Reuben in regard of his primogeniture; the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power; yet blots him in the next Verse, because of his sinne, thou shalt not excell, Gen. 49. 3, 4. This sense of the word suits well with the scope of the text in hand. His excellency, that is, whatso­ever doth excell, or is best in him. But what is that? Some by his Excellency understand the soule; as if he had said, that best part [Page 162] of man, the soule, which may be opposed to clay and dust before spoken of, that noble guest, that royall inhabitant of this house of clay goeth out when death enters. Death dissolves the union be­tween soule and body.

Or rather we may take excellency for any speciall endowment; first of the body, as beauty or strength. Secondly of the minde, as wit and knowledge, learning or skill. Thirdly, we may take it for those worldly excellencies of riches, honour, or authority; when a man goeth out, all these excellencies which are in him, or which are about him, go out too. This excellency is the same which is called the goodlinesse of man, by the Prophet (Esay 40. 6.) The voice said, cry, what shall I cry? All flesh is grasse, and all the goodlinesse thereof is as the flower of the field. Not only is the flesh, but the goodliness thereof fading also. So here, not only the house of clay and the foundation of dust, but the excellency of it: all the adorning and polishing, the guilding and painting, the rich hang­ing and precious furniture of this house go away.

Taking excellency here for the soule, then, we see wherein our excellency consists As man was the principall part of the creati­on, so the soule is the principall part of man. The constitution of the soule is mans naturall excellency, and the conversion of the soule is mans spirituall excellency.

Secondly observe, Death is the going away, or the departure of the soule from the body. Death is called sometime a departure of body and soule out of the world, Now lettest thou thy servant de­part in peace (saith old Simeon, Luke 2.) Man goes to his long home, Eccles. 12. 5. I go the way of all flesh, saith Moses, and I goe away, saith our Lord Christ of his death. Death is also called a de­parture of the soule from the body. The death of Rachel is thus described, Genesis 35. 18. And it came to passe, that as her soule was in departing, for she dyed.

From the other interpretation, which I rather insists upon. Ob­serve, that in death all a mans naturall and outward excellency whatsoever, leaves him and departs from him, Psal. 49. 16. Be not thou afraid when one is made rich, when the glory of his house is increased; why? for when he dyeth he shall carry nothing away with him, his glory shall not descend after him; though a man have an excellent out-side, a great stock of riches, beauty and ho­nour, though he have excellent linings of wisdome and know­ledge, yet all ends as to him, when he ends, and therefore David [Page 163] concludes (Psal. 39.) Man at his best state, or in his best estate is altogether vanity. The excellencies that are in him goe away, in that day all his thoughts perish, his counsels and his projects pe­rish with him. One of the ancients standing by Caesars Tomb, (who was one of the most accomplisht men in the world, for na­turall, civill, and morall excellencies; learned, valiant, noble, rich and powerfull,) he (I say) standing by Caesars Tomb, wept and cried out, where is now the flourishing beauty of Caesar? what's Ʋbi nunc pul­ch [...]itudo Caesa­ris? quo abiit magnificentia tua. become of his magnificence? where are the armies now, where the honours of Caesar? where are now the victories, the triumphs and trophies of Caesar? All's gone, all's departed, the goodlinesse of them is as the flower of the field, his excellency which was in him is gone away. And thus it will be said of all those, who (with­out grace) are most excellent in any thing below. Though your clay be curiously wrought, and stampt with such beauty, as renders you almost Angelicall to the eye of others. Though your bodies are strongly joynted, and blessed with such health as renders your lives most active and comfortable to your selves; though your mindes are stored with variety of learning, and you know as much as is knowable in the whole circle of Nature, or of times; yet when Death comes, all these excellencies go away. Nothing will stay by us then, and go (not from us but) with us, but the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus our Lord, for whom (Paul did, and) we ought to suffer the losse of all things, and count them but dung, that we may winne Christ, (Phil. 3. 8.) For notwithstanding all other knowledge and wisdome, we shall dye and conclude (as this Chapter concludes of man) without wisdome. They dye even [...] without wisdome, or word for word. They dye not and in wisdome. We may understand it two wayes. First (as if he had said) though men are excellent in wisdom, yet they dye; their wisdom is to them in death, as if they had no wisdome; they have no more priviledge or defence against the stroak of death, by all their wisdome, learn­ing Nalla est sapi. entia qua mor­tem effugiant. Merc. and knowledge, then fooles or bruit beasts who have no know­ledge, no wisdome at all, they dye even without wisdome, or even as if they had no wisdome. Died Abner as a foole dyeth, said mourning David? 1 Sam. 3. 33. yes, Abner dyed as a foole dyeth. And so in one sense doe the wisest of men. He was the wisest of all the children of men, and he spake it by the wisdome of God, who asking this question, How dyeth the wise man, answers, as the foole, Eccles. 2. 16. Let not any man pride himself in the excellen­cy [Page 164] of his wisdome: for that dwels in a house of clay whose founda­tion is in the dust: his frailty is not curable by his excellency, nor his mortality conquerable by his wisdome, he shall dye as if he had no wisdome. And some who have most worldly wisdome, dye Non in sapient [...]a extenuatio est, i. e. in mag­na stultitia, Pined. with least, yea, they with the greatest folly. Not in wisdome, may be an extenuation, or a more gentle, easie expression, for, in abundance of folly. I remember it is observed concerning Paracel­sus (a great Physitian, a man exceedingly verst in Chymicall experi­ments) that he brag'd and boasted, he had attained to such wisdom in discerning the constitutions of men, and studying remedies, that whosoever did follow his rules, and keep to his directions, should never dye by any disease, casually he might, and of age he must, but he would undertake to secure his health against diseases; a bold undertaking. But he who by his art promised to protect others, to extreame old age from the arrest of death, could not by all his art or power make himself a protection in the prime of his youth, but dyed even as one without wisdome, before, or when he had seene but thirty. Secondly, they dye without wisdome. That is, they can­not carry their wisdome away with them; as not their world­ly riches and pompe so nor their worldly wisdome and knowledge, Chap. 36. 12.

Thirdly, They dye even without wisdome, that is, they prepare not wisely for death. This is the condition of most men, their ex­cellency goes away with them, and they die without wisdome; they have had wisdome, but they die as if they had none, that is, they apply not their wisdome while they live, to fit themselves for death: They die before they understand what it is to live, on why they live. This wisdome is wanting in most men, and of all such, the Psalmist concludes to this sense of the place, Man being in honour and understandeth not, is like the beasts that perish, Psal. 49. 20. That is, he perishes foolishly and without wisdome, like a beast, though in his life a man of honour and excellency. He Moriuntur in simen [...]es vel in­sipienter. Drus. Prius moriun­tur quam quic­quam intellex­g [...]i [...]t de divina sapientia, Mer. that dies unpreparedly, dies foolishly. It is the wisdome of man to live in the world in the meditation of, and preparation fo his departure out of this world. And it is such a wisdome as is above man, therefore David prayes, Psal. 39. 4. Lord make me to know mine end and the measure of my dayes, what it is; that I may know how fraile I am: as if he had said; Lord I have been considering this and that thing (haply Davids thoughts were in the dust, and he had been handling the clay out of which he was made) yet saith [Page 165] he, by all those considerations of my naturall constitution, I cannot bring my heart to be so sensible of my frailty, as I ought to be; therefore he turnes himselfe to God, Lord make me to know this thing. Here is our wisdom, when we seek to God to spiritualize na­turall considerations, and make them effectuall for the attaining of this wisdom, the knowing of our end, and the measure of our days.

But is it not some ignorance of our duty no petition for the knowledge of our end? May we desire to know what God hath no where promised to reveale? To petition for the literall know­ledge of our end, that is, what yeare or day, our lives shall end, is a sinfull curiosity, and a presumptuous intrusion into the secret will of God: But to petition for a spirituall knowledge of our end, that is, how we may end well, any day of the yeare, or any houre of the day, is a holy duty, and an humble submission of our selves to the revealed will of God. Thus to know our end, how soone ceasing (as one translates) short lived and brittle ware we be; Thus to know, how defective we are (as the Greeke renders it) or what we lack, namely to the end of our dayes, is above the in­struction of any creature. We may preach, and you hear of death as long as you and we live, and yet not know he frailty of our lives, till God makes us know it; therefore (saith he) Lord make me to know how fraile I am; none could teach him this lesson but God himselfe. The same holy desires are breathed out, Psal. 90. 12. So teach us to number our dayes, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdome; as if Moses had said; Lord I have been numbring my dayes my selfe, and telling over my life, I can tell no further than three or foure score, and yet though I can tell no far­ther, I cannot apply my heart unto wisdome; we need but little Arithmetick to unmber our dayes, but we need a great deale of grace to number them. A child may be wise enough to number the dayes of an old man, and yet that old man a child, in numbring his own dayes, that is, not able to number his own dayes so, as to apply his heart to wisdome. To number them so, is a very spe­ciall point of wisdome; the true Christian Phylosophy: perfectly Meditatio mo [...] ­tis vita est per­fecta. Greg. Moral. 13. Su [...] ma philo­sophia, Bern. to meditate on death is the perfection of life. And it is therefore our wisdome to die well, because we can die but once; Aman had need doe that wisely which he can doe no more. An errour in death, is like an error in Warre you cannot commit it twice. We have most reason to looke to it, not to erre at all, where it is not [Page 166] possible to erre againe. Actually to erre twice, is more sinfull, but not to have a possibility of erring twice, is most dangerous. We transgresse the lawes of living over and over a thousand thousand times: But as for the lawes of dying, no man ever transgressed them a second time. That we so often transgresse the law of living, is an aggravation of sin upon all men. And that we can transgresse the law of dying but once, is the seale of misery upon most men. Let us then cry unto God to be taught this great wisedome, how to die, and not without wisedome.

JOB. Chap. 5. Vers. 1, 2.

Call now if there be any that will answer thee, and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne?

For wrath killeth the foolish, and envy slayeth the silly one, &c.

THE five first verses of this Chapter, containe the fourth Argument, by which Eliphaz goes on to convince Job of sinful hypocrisie. And the conviction is made two wayes, from a two-fold comparison. First, He compares Job to the Saints, and finds him unlike to them: Secondly, He compares Job to the wicked, and finds him like to them; if so, then Job must needs be a hypocrite, who had carried it faire all the while in the world, for a great professor, and yet when he comes to the tryall, was unlike all the Saints, and most like the wicked of the world. The first Argument may be thus framed.

He is not a just or a holy man, who in his affliction is altogether unlike holy and just men.

But Job, thou in thy affliction art altogether unlike holy and just men.

Therefore thou art not a holy or a just man.

The proposition is implied: The Minor or the Assumption, is in the first verse, Call now, if there be any that will answer thee, and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne? As if he should say, Inquire as much as thou wilt, thou shalt find none among the Saints like thy selfe; they, who have been somewhat like thee (of whom thou shalt find but few) in the troubles which thou hast borne, even those thou wilt find altogether unlike thee, in bearing those troubles. Scarce any of the godly ever suffered such things as thou hast done, but none of the godly ever did such things in their suf­ferings.

As he argues him in the first verse of hypocrisie, by his unlike­nesse to the Saints; so in the next words, he argues him of hypo­crisie, by his likenesse to the wicked: His first argument for this, lyes in the second verse, and in the three following verses there lyes a second argument to confirme the same point; He attempts [Page 168] to prove Job like a foole or a wicked man, two wayes.

  • 1. In his manner of suffering.
  • 2. In the matter of his suffering.

First (saith he) thou art like a foole, or like a foolish man, like the worst of men, in the manner of thy carriage under sufferings; The argument may be framed thus.

He that behaveth himselfe like a foole, or like a wicked man while he is in trouble, is a man either openly wicked, or grossely hypocriticall.

But Job, thou behavest thy selfe, like a foolish or a wicked man in thy troubles.

Therefore thou art wicked, &c.

The Assumption, or Minor Proposition, is in the second verse, Wrath killeth the foolish, and envy slayeth the silly one. As if he should say, Thou pinest, ragest and vexest thy selfe under they suf­ferings, after the rate of foolish and silly ones, that is, sinfull and wicked ones.

Secondly, He would prove Job, to be a hypocrite, because his sufferings for the matter of them, were like the judgements which God uses to powre forth upon wicked und ungodly men; and that argument may be thus framed.

Wicked men flourish a while, and then sudden destruction com­meth upon them, they and their children, and their whole estates are swallowed up in a moment.

But Job, thou having flourished a little while, wast suddenly surprised and swallowed up by judgements, thou, thy estate, thy chil­dren, all devoured and consumed.

Therefore thou art a wicked man, a very hypocrite; God hath dealt with thee as he uses to deale with his enemies, and therefore thou art not his friend.

This is the Logicke of the context, or the reasons couched in them, whereby Eliphaz would convince Job of sinne; By this, a generall light is let into the whole Context.

Now, we will consider the words, and open their sense di­stinctly.

Call now if there be any that will answer thee, and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne?

Interpreters vary much about the meaning of these words.

First, Some of the Jewish Writers, looke upon these words, as [Page 169] proceeding from hight and pride of spirit in Eliphaz, as if he dis­dained to talke with Job any longer about the businesse; as if he looking upon Job as no match for him, in point of argument, bids him looke out an Angel or a Saint to grapple with him in these disputes, and see if he could find any one of those, who would undertake for him as an Advocate, or be his Second, forasmuch as himselfe was so unable to defend his cause, or justifie what he had done; Call now if there be any that will answer thee, that is, answer for thee, or to which of the Saints wilt thou turne for help, to patronize or plead thy cause? But I shall passe that.

Secondly, Others of the Jewish writers make the sense out thus, as if Eliphaz had said with Paul in the point of the Lords Supper (1 Cor. 11. 24.) That which I have delivered unto you, I have received of the Lord, so, that which I delivered unto thee in my former argument, I received from the Lord in a vision, it was re­vealed unto me from Heaven: now, doe thou try whether thou canst learne any thing from Heaven, or from the Saints upon the earth (who are instructed to and for the Kingdome of Heaven) which may answer my arguments, or confute the reasons which I have broughc against thee. I had a vision from Heaven, now call thou to Heaven, and see if thou canst have any answer from thence; Turne also to the Saints, to any Saint upon the earth, and see what they will answer thee, I believe thou wilt not find one amongst them all, differing in judgement from me, or from that Oracle, with Nemo tibi pra­vè corrupteq. de his rebus iu­dicanti patro­nus aderit, nemo qui tibi re­spondeat, tibi ac [...]inat, tuam sententiam [...]ue­atur. which I have now acquainted thee. They will all agree with me in these great principles, about the providence, power and justice of God, about the sufferings sinfullnesse and weaknesse of man. That's a second sense.

Thirdly, Others take the words as an Ironie, as a derision, or scorne put upon Job by Eliphaz; As if Eliphaz had mocked him thus; Thou hast handled the matter well, thou hast carried thy selfe so, in the dayes of thy peace and prosperity, that now when thou art in trouble, thou mayest call long enough, and cry till thy throat akes and thy spirits be spent, and yet have none to answer thee, none to speake a word to thee, or to doe thee any good; though thou cry to all the Saints, and send to all thy friends round about thee, yet in this day none will heare or regard thee: Thou wilt find thy selfe forsaken of all, no man will give thee any assistance, or take any care of thy condition. Just, as Elijah brake forth in holy scorne against the Prophets of Baal (1 King. 18. 27.) [Page 170] when they were crying out to their Idol for helpe, and a signe by fire, Cry aloud (saith he) cry aloud; he bad them cry aloud, yet he knew the Idol was deafe and dumbe, and could neither heare their cry, nor give them answer; So Eliphaz seemes to speake to Job, Cry aloud now, to this, to that Saint, with whom thou art acquainted here on earth, or cry to Heaven, cry to God himselfe; call this way, call that, if any will answer thee, either God above, or Saint below, thou shalt not find here or there any to assist, any to releeve thee. And so he seems to allude to that just retaliation of God, who usually turnes his eare from their cry in a day of trouble who have turned their eares from his counsels, in the dayes of com­fort; As (Prov 1.) Wisedome threatens, They shall call, but I will Vox in tribu­latione eum non invenit quem mens in [...]ranquilitate contempsit. Greg. in loc. not answer, they shall cry, but I will not heare. Why? because they have refused instruction, and have not chosen the feare of the Lord.

In the fourth place, Most of the Popish writers, busie themselves much to ground invocation of Saints, & the intercession of Saints for us, upon this text: As if Eliphaz had directed Job to cry to the Saints departed; Call now if there be any that will answer, and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne? what Saint wilt thou choose for thy patron or helper in this sad condition? So they teach and practise, having appointed a particular Saint in the Kalender of the yeare, to the help of every particular affliction in their lives, and to these they turne themselves in every distresse: They have a Saint for the sea, and a Saint for the land, a Saint for the fire, and a Saint for the water, a Saint for each disease of the body, and for each disaster in the family: To some of these they suppose Job was ad­vised to have recourse, for succour and comfort in his troubles. And yet they are divided in opinion, & give a double sense about it. First, As if Eliphaz had thus bespoken him; If thou doest not give credit unto me, nor believe what I have spoken was revealed Aquinus in loc. from God, then call thou thy selfe upon God, and try whether he will not give thee some answer, and resolve thy doubt: Or if by reason of thine own unworthynesse, thou canst not obtaine an im­mediate answer at the hand of God, then turne thee to some of the Sainrs, that by their mediation thou maist receive light from God, to assure thee about my vision, whether it were sent from Heaven or no. Secondly, Others interpret it more largely, as if Eliphas perceiving Job to be brought to some light and acknow­ledgement of his sins, and now to thirst after the pardon of them: [Page 171] he in these words, exhorts him to call upon, and cry unto God for pardon, if perhaps he himselfe would vouchsafe to answer; But in case shame did so cover his face, and guilt so stop his mouth, that he could not speake unto God immediately, then he adviseth him to pray in aide, from some of the Saints departed, who might manage this sute, and intercede for him at the throne of grace. The grossenesse of this interpretation is such, as carries a selfe-refutati­on with it, and therefore I shall not need to stay long, about the re­futing of it. Neither will I stay to argue against that groundlesse, uselesse Doctrine in generall, The invocation of Saints departed, Which finds no letter of command or direction, no letter of pro­mise or acceptation, no letter of example or practice, for our imita­tion, in the whole Booke of God. But is a reproach to the Saints, & a dishonour to God, whose Name and incommunicable Title is, The God hearing prayers, and therefore to him shall the desires of all flesh come, and if all to him, then who to Saints or Angels? Only He can be the object of our prayer who is the object of our faith, Rom. 10. How shall they call on him, on whom they have not believed? To whom we pray, upon him we must believe Saints departed, are not to be believed upon, how then shall they be called on?

But, to leave the question, I shall only touch two things, to shew how wide they are in this exposition.

First, The confessed Doctrine of Popery tells us, that, before Christs comming in the flesh, and his resurrection from the grave, all the Saints departed were in Limbus, a place which they have framed and built up in their own fancies, as the common receptacle of all those, who died in the faith of Christ, before Christ died; Therefore, they tell us (to eke out the story) That as Christ went downe into Hell, the place of the damned, to strike terrour into the Devils, so he went into this Limbus, thence to deliver the fathers from that prison▪ and carry them up with himselfe into glo­ry. Now this being their Tenet, how senselesse is it, for them, to ground their opinion, of invocation of Saints, upon any Scrip­ture of the old Testament? and therefore it is so, to ground it upon this.

Secondly, if we consider these words we may as well seek for fire in the bottome of the Sea, as for the invocation of Saints in this Text, for here is no such thing spoken of; and if any thing sounds that way, it is rather to condemne praying to Saints, then any con­firmation of it: for call now if there be any that will answer thee, [Page 172] carries this sense rather; call now, for there is none to answer thee, and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne? that is, none among Voca si quis est qui tibi responde [...] q. d. nemo tibi responde­bi [...]. Merc. Quod quidam nosto [...]um hunc locum adsancto­rum mor [...]o [...]ū invocationem quam veteres ne agn [...]ve [...]unt q [...]idem refe­run [...] merum de­ [...]er [...]um est. Idem Paulo post. Nihil hic de sanctorum m [...]r­tuorum invo­catione; Tho­mas Aquinas & Ly [...]an [...] eò quidem refe­run [...]ed aequae inep [...]è ne d [...] ­cam imprè. I­dem in loc [...] Nec, licet in­sultantis ali­quando sit, ut plu [...]i [...]u [...] ta­men suaden [...]is & exh [...]rtantis est. Ʋ [...] Sodes Am [...]o la [...]i­nis. all the Saints (if thou turnest to them) can give thee any help: As Mercer a moderate Papist gives the meaning of this Scripture; against the current of their interpreters.

And this will appeare more fully, in opening the Gramaticall sense of a word or two, which also will give the cleare meaning of the whole passage. Eliphaz (as was hinted in drawing out his ar­guments) calls upon Job to call to remembrance former times, to search the records of antiquity, and see whether he could find an example of any one among all the Saints, who either had such trou­bles as his, or in his troubles spake and behaved himselfe as he had done; he bids him name one, if he could.

Call now] or, Call I pray thee. What we translate, now, is some­time a particle of insulting, but most usually of perswading or in­treating. We render it as an Adverbe of time, but it rather imports a request. So Gen. 12. 13. Abraham entreates Sarah, Say I pray thee, thou art my sister. The word (Kara) which we translate, call, signifies first to cry aloud by way of preaching or proclama­tion, Isa. 58. 1. Cry aloud, lift up thy voice like a trumpet. Se­condly, by way of prayer or invocation, as Psal. 50. 15. Call upon me in the day of trouble. but it rather signifies, and that more pro­perly, to call by way of appellation, or by way of nomination, As Ruth 1. 20. Call mee not Naomi, but call mee Marah. So here, Call now that is, looke over the names, or call over the names of all the Saints, as we use to say, when many should meete toge­ther, and we would know whether they are all met: or as Stew­ards when they pay many hired servants their wages, take the Bill and call over their Names, and so pay them one by one; Mat. 20. 8. In the evening, the Lord of the vineyard saith unto his Steward; call the labourers, that is, call them by their severall names, and give them their hire. Thus we may understand the phrase in this place, reade the catalogue of the Saints, call every one by his name, and put the question to them, aske them whether ever they had such afflictions as thou hast? or aske them whether they behaved themseves under their afflictions as thou hast done? I believe thou wilt find none to answer thee. To this sense Mr. Broughton trans­lates, Call now if there be any that will defend thee, that is, be thy patron or advocate, in word, or in the example of their lives.

If there be any that will answer thee.] For, ehe word which we [Page 173] render answer, signifies not only, answering unto a question, but an answering to a condition, or a correspondency in practise. Verbum respon­de [...]e, in hoc loco significat po­ [...]us similitudinem vel com­parationem quam respon­sionem. Bold. There is an answering by likenesse of works, as well as by fitnesse of words. A reall answer, and a verball answer. Take it so, and then, Call now to the Saints, call them all by their names, intends only thus much, see if there be any that are like thee, or sute either thy spirit or thy condition, if there be any to whom thou mayest paralell thy selfe, either in the matter or manner of thy sufferings. Thou art more like a Heathen, who knows not God, then any of the Saints, in these complainings. And seeing, out of the aboun­dance of the heart, the mouth speaks, these words speake thy heart abounding in sin, but empty of grace. Face answers face in the water. But neither thy face nor heart, will answer either heart or face of any of the Saints, in these waters of affliction. We find this word signifying similitude or comparison, or the equivalence of one thing to another, in that instance, Eccles. 10 19. Money an­swers all things; the meaning of it is, that money in a proportion or value suites paralels and fits all things: There is nothing in the world, but you may suite it with a proportion of money, money will answer it; money answers or is like all things, by an equiva­lency, though not in a formality.

And to which of the Saints wilt thou turne?

The Septuagint reade it, To which of the Angels wilt thou looke? [...]. And the learned Mercer adheres to that translation, as thinking that by Saints are meant Angels, though he be so farre from laying any bottome in the words for the Popish opinion of the mediati­on of Angels, that he expressely condemnes it; but he gives the sense thus, as if Eliphaz had reproved Job of pride, for contesting with God, when as if he did turne himselfe to Angels, he should find himselfe farre below, and much overmatcht by them: What? thou dust and ashes, more righteous and just than God? Though he charged his Angels with folly, yet even they are too wise and holy for thee to deale with. If thou wert put into the ballance with Angels, how light wouldst thou be? then, how much lighter then vanity art thou, being weighed with God? But the Hebrew is better translated Saints. The word signifies a thing or person, separated or set apart from common, and dedicated to a speciall especially, a holy use. Holinesse (in the generall nature of it) is nothing else but a separation from common, and dedication to a [Page 174] divine service, such are the Saints; persons seperated from the world, and set apart unto God; The Church in generall (which is a company of Saints) is taken out of, and severed from the world: The Church is a fountaine sealed, and a Garden inclosed; so also, every particular Saint is a person severed and enclosed from the common throng and multitude of the world: Come out from among them, and be ye separate saith the Lord, and touch no uncleane thing, and I will receive you, 2 Cor. 6. 17.

Turne thee, it is both a witty and judicious conceit that Eliphaz in these words alludes to painters or Picture-drawers, who when Allu [...]ere vide tur ad pict [...]res qui frequenter ad prototypum & exemplar, quod incitari conan [...]ur; oculos dirigam & ad illud conver­tuntur. they are drawing the Picture of a Man, or of any other thing, fre­quently turne their eyes upon the proto-type, upon that which they are to draw by: when a man sits (as they speake) to have his pi­cture taken, the Artist turnes his eye often upon him; so here, to which of the Saints wilt thou turne thee to see thy picture, or to see any one like thee? where wilt thou looke now, and by looking observe a Saint of thy complexion, a holy man like thy selfe? If the pictures of all the Saints were lost, none of them could be found in, or coppied out from thee. The word which we translate turne, Verbum [...] non simpliciter respicere sig­n [...]ficat, aut a­liquid intueri, sed cum qu dā animi inten­tione & ad a­liquem fluem. doth not signifie simply to looke about or turne the eye, but to turne the eye about with much intention or curiosity of observa­tion, to make a discovery, and find out somewhat. Sometime it signifies to looke in compassion, Psal. 25. 16 Turne thee unto me (saith David) and have mercy upon me, for I am very low: To looke in compassion, notes a strictnesse of observation, to find out what charity or mercy should supply: such a look or view of his estate David desired, that God would turne his eye upon him: to what end? that he might consider and find out all his necessities, and in mercy succour him.

So then, To which of the Saints wilt thou turne? sounds thus much, upon what Saint wilt thou fix thine eye, to find thy own likenesse, a representation of the sufferings thou bearest or of thy bearing these sufferings? Take the summe and sense of the whole verse thus; Call over the roll or catalogue of all the Saints; which either ever were, or at this day are upon the face of the earth, See, if there be any whose condition or actions will answer in pro­portion unto thine; turne thine eye upon all the holy ones, see if thou canst observe any like thy selfe, in the matter or manner of thy afflictions, in the dealings of God with thee, or in thy complai­nings against God. Job, thou standest alone for all the Saints, [Page 175] goe to the fooles of the earth, and to the prophaner Infidels, among them thou mayest haply meet thy patterne, and among their records reade the story of thy own impatience and miscarriage: For (as it followes) wrath billeth the foolish, and envy slayeth the silly one.

How like a foole and silly one art thou▪ who hast thus almost vext thy selfe to death at thy own troubles, and pinest with envy at the prosperity of others. Such seemes to be the connexion and de­pendance of the second verse with, and upon the first, which I shall presently descend to open, when I have added an observation or two from the former already opened.

It was good advice which Eliphaz gave Job in that condition, namely, to take view of the Saints, and to compare himselfe with them: Thence observe;

It is profitable for us to look to the example of the Saints, either those departed, or those alive, and by them to examine, both what we doe, and how we suffer.

God hath given us, not only his word for a rule, but he hath given us examples as a rule, to walke by. He hath given us his own ex­ample, that, we looking unto him, should be holy as he is holy in all manner of conversation; be ye holy as I am holy: God, who is The holy one, is the Highest patterne of holinesse. And he hath gi­ven us his Son, who is the expresse image of his person, and the brightnesse of his glory, to be our example. The life of Christ is a faire copy indeed, a copy without any blot, or uneven letter in it; For, He also is The Holy one. Christ is not only The principle of holinesse, but also The patterne of holinesse to his people; they that say they abide in him, must walke even as he walked; His workes, (excepting those which were miraculous and workes of mediation between God and us) are our rule, as well as his word, Heb. 12. 2. Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him, &c. words of neere im­portance with those in the text, to which of the Saints wilt thou turne thee? Looke to Jesus; when you are in sufferings and have a race of patience to run, let your eye alwayes be upon Christ, and draw the lines of your carriage, both in your spirits and out­ward actions, according to what you see in Him, Looke to Him: And ver. 3. Consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners.

Which the Apostle Peter (1 Pet. 2. 21.) gives us in plaine termes, For even hereunto were ye called, because Christ also suffered for us, leaving an example that we should follow his steps: [Page 176] We must follow his steps both in the matter and in the manner of our sufferings; therefore Christ saith; Take my yoke upon you, and learne of me, Mat. 11. 29. Christ calls it his yoke (it is a yoke of affliction as well as a yoke of instruction) And he calls it his yoke, not only because, he, as a Lord layes it upon the necks of others, but because, he, as a servant bore that yoke himselfe; therefore he saith, Take my yoke upon you and learne of me, that is, not only take my yoke upon you for the matter, but learne of me for the manner, how to beare that yoke. Besides these grand leading, uner­ring examples of God and Christ, the examples of the Saints are also commended to our imitation, both in doing and in suffe­ring. Whatsoever things were written (and examples were written) aforetime, were written for our instruction. Why hath the Holy Ghost set so many pens a worke, to write the lives of the Saints? why hath he kept a record of them in his own book, but for direction to his people in after-times. The Lord hath not regi­stred any one act of the Saints, but is usefull for us. The acts of Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Samuel, David, are full of practi­call Divinity. The sufferings and troubles of these and many o­thers, are full (if I may so speake) of pathical Divinity: As the Apostle James his counsell doth more then intimate (James 5. 10.) Take my brethren the Prophets who have spoken in the Name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction and of patience; Hence those antient Saints and believers (Heb. 12. 1.) are called a cloud of witnesses; A cloud, because there is a directive or a lea­ding vertue in them; As there was a cloud that went before the children of Israel in the day to leade them, so this cloud of witnes­ses, leads us up and downe the wildernesse of our sorrowes, and in the darke night of our sufferings. Turne you to the Saints, to that cloud of witnesses, eye them, and see what becomes you in sad times; They have suffered joyfully the spoiling of their goods, suf­fer you likewise, if you come into the hands of spoilers. They li­ved by faith in the midst of a thousand deaths, live you likewise by faith in death, when ever you come into the hand of that king of terrors. And when at any time your own hearts or the wayes of others are out of course, check and chide them for and from those disorders, by sending them to the practise of the Saints. Looke to the Saints, from which of the Saints have you learned to be proud and high minded? from which of the Saints have you learned to be earthly and covetous? from which of the Saints [Page 177] have you learned to seek and set up your selves, or to be impatient under the hand of God? That man hath reason to suspect he hath done ill, who doth that, which a good man never did, or ever repented the doing of it. Observe further;

When God forsakes a man, all the Saints on earth forsake him too. Eliphaz lookes upon Job, as a man forsaken of God, and then he bids him get help if he could among the Saints. He that opposes God, shall be opposed by all who are Gods. There is the same mind in the servants of Christ, which is in Christ their Master. They love where and whom he loves, they hate whom he hates, they are ashamed of those, of whom Christ is ashamed; If God reject a man, the Saints will not undertake or answer for him. So much of the first Argument, ranking Job with the wicked, because (as Eli­phaz thought) he could not find any in the rank of Saints like him­selfe.

The second Argument rises to a like conviction, because, (in the same mans opinion) he might easily see himselfe so like the wicked.

For wrath kills the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one.

Here are two sinfull passions, wrath and envy, and here are two sorts of sinfull persons, The foolish man, and The silly one producing two sad effects, (which yet in effect are but one,) The one kills, and the other slayes, both are deadly and destructive, wrath killeth the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one. There are severall sinnes and lusts which accompany, as the severall ages and deg [...]ees, so the Omne pomum, omne g [...]anum, omne frumen­tum, omne lig­num habet ver­mem suum, & alius vermis mali, alius pyri, alius Tritici. August. severall tempers of men. Rashnesse and intemperance, hurry and inflame young men; ambition blowes up riper yeares, and cove­tousnesse often tyranizeth over old age: Wrath takes hold of fools, and envy seizeth the silly one. These wormes strike the roote of such men, and make them wither. As there is a speciall worme killing speciall trees, and consuming their fruits; so there are speci­all lusts, which like wormes, eate out, and destroy the life of man; wrath killeth the foolish man.

The foolish man.] He is A foole, who hath not wisedome to di­rect [...] Temerarius, au­dax, imprudens, percitus ira. himselfe; but The foole, is he, who will not follow the counsell and direction of the wise. The word signifies, not so much a foole, who hath no knowledge; as a foole, who makes no use of the knowledge, which he hath: such a one is a foolish man indeed. Or it notes a man hasty, bold, inconsiderate, rushing on hand over head, without feare or wit. A man, who either is master but of lit­tle knowledge, or that which he hath (be it little or much) ma­sters [Page 178] him. It agrees fully in sense, and is the same to a letter in found, with our English word Evill; Such the Prophet (Zech. 11. 15.) describes: Take (saith he) the instruments of a foolish sheapheard, he doth not meane, the instruments of a rude and meerely ignorant sheapheard, a man that hath no knowledge or learning, but of a rash and imprudent shepheard, or of a lazie and idle shepheard, who, though hath knowledge, yet knowes not how (or hath no heart) to improve his knowledge for the good of his flock. The Prophet Ezekiel gives us the character of such, Chap. 34. 4. The diseased have ye not strengthened, nor have ye healed that which was sicke, nor bound up that which was broken, &c. but (will ye know what work they made?) with furie and with crueltie have ye ruled them; ye have been moved with fury, not with pity, and acted by passion, not by reason, much lesse by grace. So in this place, the foolish man, whom envy slayes, is not a meere ignorant, one that hath no brains, but one hare-brayn'd and uncompos'd Eliphaz hints at Job secretly in this word, whom he knew reported for a man of great knowledge and learning, ac­cording to the learning of those times, yet he numbers him with N [...]n his solum sed calamo i [...]os [...]imur in scribendo, eum (que) [...] & fra [...]g [...]mus, & pecto [...]s pene­callo & alcato res tesseris & cuicun (que) instru­mento quil [...]bet, ex quo d [...]fficul­tatem se pa [...] arbitratur August [...]ra stultitiae come [...]. sooles, because, he conceived him wrathfull, rash, intemperate, not having any true government of himselfe. Anger resteth in the bosome of fooles, Eccles. 7. 9. A foole is not able to judge of the nature of things or times, or occasions, and therefore he is angry with every thing that hits not his nature or his humour. He will be angry with the Sunne, if it shine hotter then he would have it, and with the winds, if they blow harder then he would have them, and with the clouds, if they raine longer then serves his turne. They that are emptiest of understanding, are fullest of will, and usually so full of will, that we call them will-full. Hence, unlesse every thing be ready to serve their wills, they are ready to dye by the hand or judgement of their passions.

Wrath kills this foolish man.] Wrath may be taken here two woyes, either for the wrath of God, or for the wrath of man. In the former sense, the meaning is, That the wrath of God kills foo­lish men; Which is an undoubted truth, but I rather adhere to the latter, which gives the meaning thus, That the wrath of a foolish man, kills himselfe; his own wrath, is as a knife at his throate, and as a sword in his own bowels: The word which we translate wrath, signifies indignation, anger, teastinesse or touchinesse: Properly wrath is anger inveterate; anger is a short fury, and [Page 179] wrath is a long anger; when a man is set upon't, when his spirit is steeped and soak't in anger, then 'tis wrath. Esau raked up the burning coales of his anger in the ashes, till his Fathers Funerall, The time of mourning for my father will shortly come, then will I slay my brother. But our word rather notes, a servent heate and [...] distemper of spirit presently breaking forth, or an extreame vexa­tion fretting and disquieting us within: As Psal. 112. 10. The wicked shall see it and be grieved, (that is, he shall have secret in­dignation in himselfe to see matters goe so) He shall gnash with his teeth and melt away. Gnashing of the teeth is caused by vexing of the heart; And therefore it followes, he melts away; which notes (melting is from heate) an extreame heate within. The sense is very suitable to this of Eliphaz, wrath slayeth the foolish, or wrath makes him melt away, it melts his grease with chafing, as we say, of a man furiously vext; Hence that deplorable condition of the damned, who are cast out of the presence of God for ever, is described by weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth; which imports not onely paine, but extreame vexing at, or in themselves. Those fooles shall be slaine for ever with their own wrath, as well as with the wrath of God.

Wrath killeth, &c.] But how doth wrath kill a foolish man? his wrath sometimes drawes his sword and kils others: but is his wrath as a sword to kill himselfe? Many like Simeon and Levi, in their anger have slaine a man; but that the anger of a man should slay himselfe, may seeme strange? The passion of vvrath is such an engine, as recoyles upon him that uses or discharges it. As the desire of the slothfull killeth him, Prov. 21. 25. so, the wrath of a foolish man kils him: that place enlightens this; how comes desire to stay the slothfull? thus; A man slothfull in action is full of desires and quick in his affections after many good things: he would faine have them, he longs for them: but the man is so ex­treame lazie, that he will not stirre hand or foot to get the things which he desires, and so he pines away with wishing and woulding, and dies with griefe, because desire is not satisfied. So, in like man­ner, wrath is said to slay a man; first, because it thrusts him head­long upon such things, as are his death; he runnes wilfully upon his own death, sometimes by the dangerousnesse of the action, whence casuall suddaine death surprises him; sometime by the unlawful­nesse of the action, which brings him to a legall or judiciary death. Secondly, his wrath is said to kill him, because his wrath is so vex­ations [Page 180] to him, that it makes his life a continuall death to him, and at last so wearieth him out, and wasts his spirits, that he dyes for very griefe: and so at once commits a three-fold murder; First he murders him intentionally, against whom he is wroth: Secondly, he, really, murders his own body; and thirdly, he, meritoriously, murders his soule for ever, except the Lord be more mercifull, then he hath been wrathfull, and the death of Christ heal those wounds, by which he would have procured the death of others, and hath (as much as in him lies) procured his own.

And envie slayeth the silly one.] These two expressions meet neere upon a sense. Envy is the trouble which a man conceives in himselfe, at the good which another receives. This disease gets in at the eyes and eares, or is occasioned by seeing or hearing of our neighbours blessings. In the 1 Joh. 2. All the lusts in the world are reduced to three heads, The lust of the eyes: the lust of the flesh; and the pride of life; Envy is the chiefest lust of the eyes, and it is properly called the lust of the eye: because a man seldom envieth another, untill he sees, some good, he hath above himselfe. This passion is a murderer also, it begins at the eyes, but it rots down in­to the bones.

Envy slayeth the silly one.] There is not much difference be­tween the nature of these two, the foolish man, and the silly one: But the Originall words by which they are expressed are very dif­ferent. The roote signifies to perswade, to intice, or allure: And it [...] Sua sus per sua sus, d [...]eptus, seductus fuit, h [...]nc [...] sua deo, apud Grecos. [...] Japheth le Ja­ [...]he [...]h. is taken sometime in a good sense (as in Gen. 9. 27.) where the Holy Ghost speakes with admirable elegancy, God will perswade the perswadable; we translate it, God will perswade Japhet. Japhet had his name from being perswaded or perswadable, God shall intice or perswade Japhet: which was a prophecie of the calling of the Gentiles, who are descendants from Japhet, as the Jewes are from Shem. So, that word is applied to Gods drawing, or, allu­ring men by the sweet promises and winning enticements of the Gospell. God doth (let it be taken in holy reverence) tole men on by promises, and deceive them graciously into the Gospell. (Hos. 2. 14.) I will allure her and bring her into the wildernesse. And be­cause by perswasions men are often deceived and seduced to evill, therefore the word signifies also to deceive and beguile, as well as to perswade; and in the passive to be beguiled and deceived; Hence, the word in the text is derived, which we translate a simple one, or a man that will easily be perswaded & led by another, a sequatious [Page 181] or easie man, whom you may carry with a mouth full of good words, and faire promises, whether you will. Yet, we finde this word (Psal 116. 6.) used in a good sense, for a man without sin­full guile and craft, a simple, honest, plaine-hearted man, The Lord preserveth the simple. But here and often else-where it is ta­ken in an ill sence, for a man without sence and reason, without heart and spirit, a man that cannot in any competency judge of things, or make out his way, but is meerly led, and lives upon the opinion and judgement of another: To such wisdome cryeth with­out and uttereth her voyce in the streets, how long yee simple ones, will ye love simplicity, Prov. 1. 20, 22. This silly one envie slayeth; Exiguo animo & abjecto spi­ritu. He is out of his wits already, and a little matter will put him out of his life: Envy slayeth him, that is, a simple man looking upon the prosperity and blessings of God upon his neighbour, will needs afflict himselfe: he lookes upon himselfe, as having lost all, if that man gaine: he fals, if his brother stands, and can with more ease die miserably, then see another live happily. In this sense it is, That envie kils the silly one.

Now the reason why Eliphaz speakes of these two, the foolish and the simple one, and characters them, as dying by the hand of these two lusts, wrath and envie is, because he conceived all Jobs troubled, and (as he thought) muddy complaints in the third Chapter, arose from these two impure and filthy springs, wrath and envie, from proud wrath, and impotent envie; he looked up­on him, as angry and displeased, yea as enraged, because God had dealt so ill with him; and he supposed he saw him pale and wanne, eaten up and pined with envie, because others were so well, be­cause his friends enjoyed health & lived in prosperity round about him. As if he had said, Thou art wroth at thy owne povertie, sick­nesse and sores, and thou art envious at our plentie, health and ease. And may not folly and simplicitie, challenge that man for Theirs, whose spirit thus resents, either his own evils, or his neighbours good? Observe hence,

First, Every wicked man, is a foolish, a silly man; Sinne is pure folly, In the Proverbs all along, wickednesse is the Interpretation of foolishnesse. It is folly to take brasse Counters for gold, and to be pleased with Bugles more then with Diamonds. When an heyre is impleaded for an Ideot, the Judge commands an apple, or a counter, with a peece of gold to be set before him, to try which he will take; if he takes the apple or the counter, and leaves the [Page 182] gold, he is then cast for a foole, and unable to mannage his estate, for he knows not the value of things, or how to make a true e­lection. Wicked men are thus foolish and more, for when bu­gles and diamonds, counters and gold are before them, they leave the diamonds and the gold, and please themselves with those toyes and bables; when (which is infinitely more sottish) Hea­ven and hell, life and death are set before them, they chuse hell ra­ther then Heaven, and death rather then life; they take the meane, transitory, trifling things of the world, before the favour of God, the pardon of finne, a part in Jesus Christ, and an inheritance a­mong the Saints in light All the wisdome of wicked men, is wis­dome in their owne conceits. And Solomon assures us, that there is more hope of a foole then of such, that is, of those, who are sensi­ble of their owne failings, and are willing (as the Apostle directs) to become fooles that they may be wise, 1 Cor. 3. 18. Opinion in it selfe is weake, but self-opinion is very strong; even the strongest of those strong-holds, and the highest of those high Towers, which the spirituall warre, by those weapons which are mightie through God, is to oppose and cast down: which, till they are cast down, these fooles are impregnable, and will not be led captive unto Christ.

Secondly, observe, That to vex and to be angerie at the trou­bles that fall upon us, or at the hand which sends them, is a high point of folly and of ignorance. Wrath and discontent slay the foo­lish, such are at once, twice slain, slain with the wrath of God, and with their own.

To die thus, is to die like a foole indeed. For first, this wrath of man springs from his ignorance of God: Man would not be angry at what the Lord doth, if he knew he were the Lord, and may doe what himselfe pleases. The ground of anger is a supposition of wrong.

Secondly, This wrath of man springs from ignorance of him­selfe. He cannot be angry with any crosse, who rightly knows him­selfe.

First to be a creature.

This notion of our selves teaches us that lesson of humility, to be subject to the will of our Creatour. The law of our creation cals us to all passive obedience, as well as unto active, as much and as quietly to suffer, as to doe the will of God. But especially, if a man did fully know himselfe to be a sinfull creature, he would not [Page 183] be angry; yea, he would lay a charge upon his mouth, not to utter a word, and a charge upon his heart not to utter a thought against what the Lord doth with him. I will beare the Indignation of the Lord, because I have sinned against him, saith the Church, Micah 7. 9. As if she had said the remembrance of my sinne takes away all pleading, much more all quarrelling, in how angry a posture soever the Lord sets himselfe to afflict me: And therefore my spirit is resolved, that because my flesh hath sinned, my flesh shall beare the indignation of the Lord. He that knowes what it is to sinne, knowes that all sufferings l [...]sse then hell, are l [...]sse then sinne. If a man were convinced of this, that, what he beares is lesse then his sinne deserves, he would beare it, with thanks, not with complaints. Irascitur, quia omnia sibi cebe­ri pu [...]at. Yea he would say, that, as he hath deserved all these and more then all these stroakes, so he hath need of them. The bundle of folly in his heart cals for a bundle of rods upon his backe and he sees want of correction might have been his undoing. Therefore to be angry with affliction, argues a man ignorant of himselfe as a creature, much more as a sinfull creature. Once more the foolish­nesse of such wrath appeares to the eye of nature and common rea­son, because this wrath brings no ease or remedy at all to those wounds, but rather makes them more painfull, if not remedilesse. It is an argument of folly to doe a thing, whereby we cannot helpe our selves, but it is folly and madnesse to doe that which hurts, which makes our wound fester and our disease grow desperate. Did any man ever ease himselfe by fretting or raging under the crosse? How many have made their crosse more heavie upon them, by raging at it? A mans owne wrath, is heavier to him then his crosse. A stone is heavie, and sand weightie, but a fooles wrath is heavier then them both, Prov. 27. 3. A fooles wrath is very heavie to others, but it is heaviest to himselfe. The text is expresse for it, which may be a third observation.

To be angry and discontent at Gods judgements is more destructive to us, then the judgements themselves.

The wrath and judgements of God afflict onely, but your owne wrath destroyes; wrath slayes the foolish. Probably God came onely to correct you, but wrath kils you. The wrath of man is a passion but it is very active upon man, and eats up the spirit which nurses and brings it forth: Frowardnesse and anger are at once our sinne and our torment. He that is angry when God strikes, strikes himselfe, whereas humble submission to the blow, turnes it into a [Page 184] kisse or an embrace, and they that sit downe quietly and believing­ly under any evill, beare it at present with more ease, and in the end, find it in the inventory of their goods. So David, It is good for me that I have been afflicted. Fourthly note,

That to envie another mans good or prosperity is an argument of the worst simplicitie.

Envy slayeth the silly one.] Envie is a common theame, I will not stay upon it; but shall onely give you two reasons to demon­strate the silly simplicity of an envious person.

1. The good of another is not thy hurt, thou hast not the lesse, because another hath more. Leah's fruitfulnesse was no cause of Rachels barrennesse. Thy portion is not impaired by thy brothers increase; thou hast thy share, and he hath but his; how silly a thing then is it to envie him, that hath much, vvhen as, his having much is not the cause why thou hast little. Againe, this troubling thy selfe that others have more, will not get thee any more; envie never brought in earnings or encrease.

2. A man of wisedome will make all the good of another his good. Take away envie, and that vvhich is mine, is thine, and if I take away envie, that vvhich is thine, is mine. To have a heart to blesse God for his blessings upon another, is it selfe a great blessing, and gives thee likewise a part in those blessings. Thus we may en­joy all the joyes and comforts, the favours and deliverances, the Tolle invidiam & quod meum est, tuum est, & si ego tollam it­vidiā quod tuū est meum est. health and peace, the riches and plenty, the gifts, yea and the very graces of all those, in vvhose graces and gifts, plenty and riches, peace and health, &c. We can really and cordially rejoyce. Where­as an envious man ever stands in his own light, and cannot rejoyce in his own mercies, for grieving at his Brothers.

So farre of the second part of the argument, whereby Eliphaz would convince Job of wickednesse, his likenesse to the wicked in bearing of, or rather fretting against his troubles.

JOB. Chap. 5. Vers. 3, 4, 5.

I have seen the foolish taking root, but suddenly I cursed his habitation.

His children are far from safety, and they are crushed in the gate, neither is there any to deliver them.

Whose harvest the hungry eateth up, and taketh it even out of the thorns, and the robber swalloweth up their substance.

TWo parts of the fourth argument were cleared in the two for­mer verses. In these three Eliphaz argues further, to the same effect. His argument is grounded upon his own experience, which had shewed many examples of foolish men, like Job (as he suppo­sed) both in his rising and in his falling, in his good days and in his evill. I have seen the foolish taking root, and suddenly I cursed his habitation, &c. The argument may be thus framed.

Foolish men flourish a while and then come to certaine and sudden destruction, they and their children and their estates are all crushed and swallowed up.

But thou didst flourish a while, and grow up like some goodly tree, yet sudden destruction came upon thy children and upon thy estate, the robbers have consumed and swallowed all up.

Therefore thou art foolish, &c. I have seen the foolish taking root, but suddenly I cursed his habitation; I have seen thee taking root, and I observe thy habitation cursed; Thy outward condition is so paralell with theirs, that I know not how to distinguish thee, from them, in thy inward and spirituall condition.

I have seen the foolish taking root.

Eliphaz urgeth experience. He urged experience in the fourth Chapter, v. 8. Even as I have seen they that plow iniquity and sow wickednesse, reap the same, &c. He urgeth experience here againe, and this superadded experience seemes to answer an objection which might be made against that former experience: For some might say, many wicked men plow iniquity enough, and sow wick­ednesse abundantly, yet they reap comforts and the contentments of this world: they have what their hearts desire, a full harvest of riches, pleasures and honours.

It is true (saith Eliphaz) I grant it, I have observed the like [Page 186] also I have seen the foolish taking root; yea, but I can answer quick­ly and remove this objection: it doth not at all weaken my former assertion, grounded upon that experience, for as I have seen him take root, so, suddenly I cursed his habitation, his children are far from safety, &c. He flourisheth, but he withers quickly, he takes root, but he is soon puld up by the roots.

I have seene] Experience is the mistresse of truth. Truth is cal­led the daughter of time, because experience bringeth forth many truths; and the word of God is made visible in the works of God. I have seen (saith he) This truth hath run into my eye. In experien­ces the promises of God stand forth, and in experiences, the threat­nings of God stand forth, and shew themselves: all the experien­ces that we have in the world, are onely so many exemplifications of the truths contained in the promises or threatnings of the word.

The foolish] I shall not stay to open that terme, for we met [...] Levem hominē notat, qui sine consilio agit, vul [...] & facit nullam (que) facti rationum habet, nisi quia ita ve­n [...] in mentem Goc. with it in the former verse, wrath slayeth the foolish one. Onely in a word, this foolish man is one, who acts without counsell, and whose will is too hard for his understanding. He hath no reason for what he doth, but because he hath a mind to doe it. A foo­lish man is a wicked man, and here the foolish man is a wicked man at ease, a wicked man in his fulnesse and aboundance of out­ward comforts: A foole is ever worst, when he is at ease. And as he more abounds in comforts, so, he abounds more in sin. All mercies are to him but fuell for his folly, and meat and drink for his madnesse. That rich man who pleased himselfe so in his world­ly successes is cal'd a foole, Thou foole, this night shall thy soule be taken from thee, and then whose shall all these things be which thou possessest? (Luke 12. 20) All wicked men are foolish, and wicked rich men have ever the greatest stock of folly. And they are there­fore more foolish then others, because they think themselves wi­ser then all. If a man can get riches, if his root be well setled in the earth, and his branches spread fairely out, he accounteth him­selfe very wise, and so doe many others account him too. A thri­ving sinner is a foolish and an unprosperous man, but he that plots how to thrive by sin, is the most foolish man in the world, and therefore in all his prosperity most unprosperous. As the foolish take roote, so, that by which they take root is often times their folly.

Taking root] Wicked men under the outward curse are com­pared to trees not taking root, Isa. 40. 24. He bringeth the Prin­ces [Page 187] to nothing, yea they shall not be planted, yea they shall not be sowne, yea their stocke shall not take root in the earth; And Psalme 129. 6. Let them be as the grasse upon the house (having no earth to take root in) which withereth afore it groweth up, whereof the mower filleth not his hand, nor he that bindeth up the sheaves his bosome. Wicked men prospering, are compared to a tree well rooted. I have seen the foolish taking root; that is, confirmed and setled in their outward prosperity. A root is to the tree as a foundation is to the house, the establishment of it; when a tree is well rooted, it takes in the moisture of the earth freely, then the body or trunk growes big, the branches spread forth, the leaves are green, and it abounds with fruit. So that with the wel­rooting, we must take in all that concernes the flourishing of a tree. Hence, other Scriptures expresse the men of the world by trees, not onely secretly taking root in the earth, but putting them­selves forth and appearing in their visible beauty and verdure. (Ps. 37. 35.) David produceth his experience, I have seen the wicked in great power (how? taking root, yea) spreading himselfe like a greene bay-tree. They are described by their boughs, bran­ches and leaves. And in Isa. 2. 11. The day of the Lord, shall be upon the Cedars of Lebanon, that are high and lifted up, not one­ly upon the Cedars of Lebanon that are deeply rooted, but upon the Cedars of Lebanon that are high and lifted up, and upon all the Oakes of Bashan; In the 14. of Hosea v. 5. The prosperous estate of the Church (under the dew and influence of heavenly bles­sings) is held forth to us under the notion of a tree taking root. I will be as the dew to Israel, he shall grow as the Lilly, and cast his roots as Lebanon (that is as the trees in Lebanon) his branches shall spread, and his beauty shall be as the Olive tree, and his smell as Lebanon.

In the fourth of Daniel, the state, glory and magnificence of the kingdomes of this world are shadowed by a tree: Nebuchad­nezzar in a vision hath a tree presented before him, he knew not what to make of it, and therefore calls for the Wise-men to ex­pound the vision, which he thus relates, ver. 4. I saw and behold a tree in the middest of the earth, the height thereof was great, and the tree grew and was strong, and the height thereof reached un­to heaven, and the sight thereof to the ends of the earth, and the leaves thereof were faire. When Daniel comes to interpret it, (ver. 22.) he sayes to the King, Thou art this tree, &c. Nebu­chadnezzar [Page 188] in all his worldly pomp, is set forth by a goodly tree. In the 53. of Isa. v. 2. Where the birth of Christ is prophecied, it is said, That, he shall grow up before him, as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground. As a very flourishing estate, whether in spirituals or temporalls, is exprest by a tree planted by the water side: So a mean, low estate is signified by a tree in a dry ground. Our Lord Jesus, in regard of any outward glory, was like a tree in a dry ground, as the words following expound it, He hath no forme nor comelinesse, and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him. His kingdome was not like the king­dome of those great Monarchs, strong, and high, and beautifull with any created lustre. Hence observe,

First, That wicked men may flourish in great outward prosperi­ty. I have seen the foolish taking root. The Prophet Jeremiah in the twelfth of his Prophecy (a Scripture touched before, Chap. 4. v. 7. to this purpose) being somewhat scandalized at the prospe­rity of treacherous dealers, describes them thus, ver. 2. Thou hast planted them, yea they have taken root, they grow, yea they bring forth fruit. Here are four degrees; first they are planted, there is many a tree planted that takes not root, but (saith he) thou hast planted them, yea, they have taken root: There are some trees which are both planted and have taken root, yet they doe not grow, especially not to any height or greatnesse, though they live, yet they doe not thrive; These are planted, and they take root and they grow; but there are many trees planted, rooted and growing, which yet are fruitlesse; these have all, they are planted, they take root, they grow and they bring forth fruit; And who are these? Surely the worst of men, as the very next words evidence, God is neare in their mouthes, but he is far from their reines; God is neare in the mouth of such, that is, they may speak of him sometimes, but he is far from their reines, there is nothing of God in their hearts; and surely they that have no­thing of God in their hearts, have nothing of goodnesse in their hearts, or in their lives.

This present glory and prosperity of wicked men, lifts up the glory of Gods patience. How is the glory of the patience of God exalted, in letting them have ease, who are a burthen unto himself? in letting them prosper, who are (as God can be pained) a paine unto himselfe? in suffering them to flourish who vex his people, in suffering them to laugh, who make his people mourne.

Further, He gives them leave to take root and flourish (whom he could blast and root up every moment) that all may see what is in their hearts. If God did not permit them to take root, yea and sometimes to grow up and flourish, we should never see what fruit they would bring forth: we should never see those grapes of gall, those bitter clusters; if these vines of Sodome, and fields of Gomorrah, were not watered with the dew, and warmed with the Sun of some outward prosperity.

Lastly, The prosperity of wicked men, is a great tryall of good men; The flourishing of the ungodly is as strong an exercise of their graces, as their own witherings. Observe secondly,

That wicked men may not onely flourish and grow, but they may flourish and grow a great while. I ground it upon this, the text faith, that they take root, I have seen the foolish taking roote, and the word notes a dcep rooting. In the Parable of the sower [...] (Matth. 13. 21.) it is said, that the seed which fell into stony ground withered, because it had no root, noting, that the cause of a suddaine decay or withering in any plant, is the want of rooting; whereas a tree well rooted, will endure many a blast, and stand out a storme. Some wicked men stand out many stormes, like old Oakes, like trees deeply rooted, they stand many a blast, yea many a blow; spectators are ready to say, such and such stormes will certainly overthrow them, and yet still they stand: but though they stand so long, that all wonder, yet they shall fall, that many may rejoyce; and take up this proverb against them (as of old against the King of Babylon) How hath the oppressor ceased? The Lord hath broken the staffe of the wicked, and the scepter of the Ru­lers: He who smote the people in wrath, with a continued stroake, he that ruled in the Nation with anger is persecuted, and none hindreth. Therefore many shall breake forth into singing, yea the Fir trees shall rejoyce at him, and the Cedars of Lebanon, saying, since thou art laid down no feller is come up amongst us, Isa. 14.

Thirdly observe,

Outward good things are not good in themselves. The foolish take root. The worst of men may enjoy the best of outward com­forts. Outward things are unto us, as we are. If the man be good, then they are good. And though the Preacher tells us, Eccles. 9. That all things come alike unto all, yet all things are not alike un­to all. There is a great difference between the flourishing of a wise man, and the flourishing of a fool; all his flourishing and fast­ning [Page 190] in the earth is no good to him, because himselfe is not good: Spirituall good things are so good, that though they find us not good, yet they will make us good: we cannot have them indeed, and be unlike them. But worldly good things find some really good, and make them worse; others who had but a shew of goodnesse, they are occasions of making stark nought; Rooting in the earth, never helpt any to grow heaven-wards: Many deeply rooted in the earth, have grown down, and gone down to the depths of Hell.

Fourthly observe, as a consequence from the former; That the enjoyment of outward good things, is no evidence, can be made no argument that a man is good. I have seen the foolish taking root. And yet how many stick upon this evidence; blessing themselves because they are outwardly blessed. Yea, though they meet with a discovery of their sins, and sinfull bosomes in the word, though they find those sins threatned, yea cursed with a grievous curse in the word, yet they blesse themselves and say, we are rich and flou­rish, we have a good estate and credit, we take root and stand, but they forget that all this may be the portion of a foole. I have seen the foolish man taking root.

And suddenly I cursed his habitation.

The word here used, to curse, springs indifferently from two roots, which yet meet and are one, in signification: Namely, to strike through or to pierce, as a man is struck through with a staffe [...] dedu­citur, vel à [...] vel à [...] fodit, per­fodit, terrebra­vit, & per me taphoram ma­ledixit, execra­tus est; est me­taphora trans­lata ab his qui gladio aut pu­gione aliquem-transverberant, tanquam si ali­quis Dei aut hominis male­dictione traji­ceretur. Cartw. in Prov. 11. 26. or sword, or stabd with a dagger; Thus Hab. 3. 14. Thou didst strike through with his Staves the head of the villages. And Isa. 36. 6. The piercing of a reed into the hand of him that leans up­on it, is exprest by this word. So then it carries a metaphoricall allusion to the effect of a curse, the curse of God alwayes, and the curse of man upon due grounds, is as a sword or a dagger, pier­cing a man thorough and thorough, through both soule and body. I have cursed his habitation, that is, I have smitten his habitation quite through with a curse.

I cursed his habitation.

Some read, I abhorred or I abhominated his habitation. I was so far from envying this flourishing, spreading tree, or from being in love with his goodly seat and brave habitation, that I loathed and could not abide it. The cottage of an honest man was more delight­full to me, then the tents or pallaces of wickednesse.

But the word beares rather to curse; which is first to wish [Page 191] evill unto another: And secondly to fore-tell, to pronounce or de­nounce evill against another. Often in the Psalmes, Davids cur­ses upon his enemies, are predictions from the Spirit of God, not maledictions or ill wishes from his own spirit; Good men know not how to wish evill; their cursings are Prophecies not prayers: they fore-tell or fore-see evils, but they desire them not. I have Pium non de­cent dirae. not desired the woefull day, Lord thou knowest, said that Prophet, who had denounced many woefull dayes, Jer. 17. 16.

In Scripture, many are said to doe that which they declare to Id fieri ab ali­quo dicitur in Scriptura quod faciendum de­nunciatur. be, or fore-tell that it shall be. As (to give an instance or two) Levit. 13. in the case of the Leper, the text saith, that when the Priest makes up his judgement concerning the Leper (having found the tokens of Leprosie upon him) he shall defile him (ver. 3. and ver. 8.) or make him uncleane, so the Originall gives it; which we translate, The Priest shall pronounce him uncleane. In that sence the Ministers of the Gospell (whose businesse is to cleanse) defile many; yea, one way to cleanse men, is thus to de­file and pronounce them Lepers. So Isa. 6. 8. the Lord sends the Prophet against that people, and saith to him, Make the heart of this people fat, and make their eares heavy, and shut their eyes; Praedic excae­eanaos o [...]ulos, & aures ag­gravandas. Now, the Prophet did not act this himselfe, he did not deafen their eares, or blind their eyes, but onely fore-told or denounced that this, judgement should fall upon them; because they had so long stopped their eares, at last their eares should be stopt and made heavy enough; and because they had so long winked and shut their eyes, at last they should be blind, and their eyes shut fast enough; How fast are those eyes and eares lockt up, which are thus double lockt. Once more, Jer. 1. 10. The Lord gives the Prophet a strange commission, See (saith he) I have this day set thee over the Na­tions and over Kingdomes, to roote out, and to pull downe, and to de­stroy, and to throw downe, and to build and to plant. One would think this commission, more fitting for a Caesar or an Alexander, for great Commanders attended with numerous Armies, than for an unarmed Prophet; what could he doe? could he roote out Kingdomes, and destroy Nations? Yes, by denouncing the de­stroying judgements and consuming wrath of God, due unto them for their rebellions and provocations: Thus a poor weak Pro­phet can overturne a whole Kingdome, and roote up the strongest Nations. And the truth is, that, never was any Nation or King­dome rooted up by the sword, but it was first rooted up by the word; [Page 192] first God hewed them to pieces, and slew them by his Prophets, and then let in Armies of cruell enemies to doe it.

So here in the text, I have seen the foolish taking root, but sud­denly I cursed his habitation; The clear meaning is, I foretold a curse, I knew what would shortly become of his habitation It Non per invi­diam & iram dira impreca­carer, sed ani­mus p [...]aesagiret, male ipsi fore. Coc. was not anger against his person, or envy at his estate, that moved me to curse him; but it was an eye of faith, which shewed me him markt with a curse in the just threatnings of God: I saw a curse hanging over his family and dwelling, over his riches and honours: And though he then flourished, that, yet he should quickly wither and be destroyed root and branch. The curse of the Lord is in the house of the wicked, Prov. 3. 33. Man doth but see it there, the Lord sent it there.

The word is considerable which we traslate Habitation. It sig­nifies [...] a quiet, a setled, a peaceable, a beautifull habitation: And so carries an aggravation of the judgement upon this foolish man; his judgement is the worse upon him, because he thought himselfe so well, so well seated, so well setled, so secured and accommodated that he should never be removed: They are most troubled with re­movings, who thought themselves setled; troubles afflict them deepest, who supposed themselves beyond trouble. When David thought God had made his mountaine so strong, that it could not be moved, how was he troubled, as soon as God hid his face? Ps. 30. 6, 7. And if they are so troubled with shakings, who look upon their estates as setled by the favour of God, how will they be troubled to meet with totterings and shakings, much more with ruinings and destructions, whose estates at best, are bottom'd onely upon their policies, often upon their sins? We may observe from hence;

First, The estate of some wicked men, is out of the prayers of Gods people. When they goe by their dwellings, they cannot say, The blessing of the Lord be upon you, we blesse you in the name of the Lord, Psal. 129. 8. It is a great mercy to stand under the influ­ences of prayer, and for a man to have his estate, land, dwellings watered with showers of blessings and hearty good wishes from the mouths of Saints. Their blessings or their cursings, are next to the blessings and cursings of Christ, nay, they are his; It is an argument that Christ hath blessed or cursed a man, when the spirits of his people generally are carried to either. It is one of the saddest presages in the world, for a man to be cast out of the prayers of the [Page 193] Saints, or to be cast by their prayers; that is, when their prayers are against him, and he presented naked to the displeasure of Christ: It shewes that the sin of a man is a sin unto death, when the faith­full cease praying for him, 1 Joh. 5. 16. What can it prognosticate then but approaching ruine and destruction, when they bend the strength of prayer against him? There was never any habitation of wickednes, so firmly founded or strongly fortified, but that Great and Holy Ordinance hath or may shake, and batter it to the dust. The fair Towers and walls of Babylon, the seate and state of Anti­christ, have long been under this curse; All the Saints, whose eyes God hath unscaled and brought out from Egyptian darkness, have seene That foolish man taking roote, and have cursed his habitation. Secondly observe;

A wicked man in prosperity is under the curse of God. He is often under the curse of man, but ever under the curse of God. Esau have I hated (saith God, Rom. 9. 13.) yet even at that time the fatnesse of the earth was his dwelling, and of the dew of Heaven from above, Gen. 27. 39. While the meate was in the mouthes of the murmuring Israelites, the wrath of God was upon them. They did at once eate their lust and their death, wrath was mingled with their meate; and while he gave them their request, he sent leanenesse into their soules, (Psal. 106. 15.) This is the most dreadfull curse of all, To have a fate estate, a well fed body, with a leane starven soule.

Thirdly, Observe a vast difference between godly and wicked men, between the foolish and the wise. When a godly man wi­thers in his outward estate, and is pluckt up by the rootes, yet God loves him; when a godly man is poore, God loves him, when he is sick, God loves him, when he is in prison, God loves him, when he is in disgrace, God loves him, and when the world hates him most, then God usually shewes, that he loves him most; The world cannot cast a godly man into any condition, but he meets with the love of God in it; his estate may vary and vary, change and change a thousand times, but the love of God towards him is unchangeable. On the other side, we see in the text, when a wicked man takes roote, and the branches of his outward estate beare fruit abundantly, God curseth him; when he is at ease, God is angry with him. That place is very observeable (Zech. 1. 15.) I am very sore displeased with the Heathen, that are at ease; the Hea­then were at ease, yet God was extreamely displeased with them. [Page 194] When a wicked man is in health God curseth him, when he is rich God curseth him, when all men honour admire and flatter him, God abhorreth, hates and detests him; he can be in no condition, but he is sure to meet with the curse of God. As a foolish man, a wicked m [...]n, gives God many things, but he never gives God his love, or his affection; A wicked man may give God prayers, but he doth not give him his love; he may give him praises, but he ne­ver gives him any love; he may give God his purse, but he gives not his love or his heart; whether such a foole praiseth God, or prayeth to God, or giveth unto God, he hateth God. So likewise, whatsoever God gives to a wicked man he hates him, whatsoever he bestowes on him he curseth him: This should awake men roo­ted in the earth, to consider whether they are under the influences of Gods eternall love, as well as under the influence of temporall blessings: This is the ground of Davids conclusion, Psal. 37. 16. A little that the righteous hath, is better than the ricehes of many wicked: the reason is this, because many ungodly ones, swim­ming in a full sea of riches, have not so much as one drop of the love of God, nor one beame or ray of the light of his countenance shining upon them: but a godly man, if he have but a small estate, he hath much love mixed with it, if he have but a little purse, he hath a large portion of the favour of God in it, and this makes it so out-worth and out-value a wicked mans estate, this puts the price and stamps an excellency upon his little. The love of God doth so farre exceed the fatness of the earth, in the esteeme of Saints, that they in rating their estates, reckon not upon earthly things at all, they see nothing to value themselves by, but their interests in the love of God. As when God gives his people their portion, he lookes upon outward things, as meere additionalls, or as an over­plus given in by way of vantage. All other things shall be added (Mat. 6. 33.) when a man casts in a handfull of wheate after the bushell is full, or gives a fingers bredth after the due measure of the cloath; So it is in the case of all temporals bestowed upon the Saints: Then fourthly note;

Outward good things, are no argument of the favour of God.

As we shewed before, that, they are no evidences of the good­nesse of a person, so neither are they any evidences of the grace and favour of God unto a person. A man cannot find an evi­dence of Gods love in his purse, in his land, in his honour, in his cre­dit: Yea a man may flourish in better things then these I speake of, [Page 195] and yet have no evidences of Gods love to him; A man may flou­rish in knowledge, be deeply rooted in learning, may have extra­ordinary branches of parts, and wonderfull fruits of gifts, yet not­withstanding all this while, his habitation and his person too un­der a curse. And therefore, be sure that you looke for your evi­dences of the love of God in the right boxe, doe not looke for evidences of the love of God in your chests, or in your purses, but looke into your hearts, and see what Christ hath done there, looke into your lives, and see what light shines there from the Spirit of Christ; Looke whether grace flowes from the Spirit of Christ, and is rooted in your spirits. If grace be rooted in thee there, if it spring up and bring forth fruit in the life, this is an evidence indeed. They that are thus rooted, God never curseth, Grace and holiness were never under any curse.

Observe one thing further, As these words hold forth the judge­ment or opinion of a godly man, concerning the wicked in pro­sperity. I have seen the foolish taking root, and presently I cursed his habitation.

A godly man sees the wicked of the world to be miserable in their best and most flourishing condition.

When thousands stand about the great ones of the earth, admi­ring, applauding, making little gods of them, envying their hap­pinesse, and thinking none happy but they, or such as they are; then a godly man pitties them, mournes over them, sees them, and all such as they are, miserable; He lookes through all their outward glory and beauty, riches and honours, and sees them curst through all, hated of God through all; He sees nakednesse through their cloathing, emptiness and want through all their plenty and aboun­dance: neither is this unhappinesse confined to their own persons, but derived to all, to whom they derive life, or stand related. So it followes;

His children are farre from safety, and they are crushed in the gate, neither is there any to deliver them, &c.
Secundum ge­nus calamitatis quod Deus im­p [...]obisimmit [...]it, posteritatis exi­tiam deplo [...]a [...]ū, & quidem ac­clamante pub [...]i­co consensu

These words containe a further effect of this curse. I cursed his habitation, and what then? was it an ineffectuall curse? was it but wind and words, returning and doing nothing? or did it spend all its strength upon this foolish man in his own person? No, His children are farre from safety, they are crushed in the gate, &c. One of the Rabbins conceives that these words and the verse fol­lowing, [Page 196] are the forme wherein the curse was pronounced upon the habitation of the foolish man; As if Eliphaz had said, I cursed R [...]bbi Salomon, for [...]am male­dictionis esse vult. his habitation thus, Let his children be far from safety, and let them be crushed in the gate, neither let there be any to deliver; as for his harvest, let the hungry eate it up, and let the robbers swallow up their substance. And we find such a forme, Psal. 109. David pronounces the curse upon those wicked enemies, in lan­guage very sutable to this (ver. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.) Set thou a wic­ked man over him, and let Satan (an adversary) stand at his right hand. When he shall be judged, let him be condemned: and let his prayer become sinne. Let his children be fatherlesse, and his wife a widdow; let his children be continually vagabonds and beg, let them seeke their bread also out of desolate places, let the ex­tortioner cath all that he hath; and let the stranger spoile his la­bour.

But we may rather take it, as the matter, then as the forme of a curse. I cursed his habitation, and the curse brake forth upon his children, and upon his estate, upon the branches, and the fruit of that goodly tree: much like that in the vision, Dan. 4. 13, 14. I saw in the visions of my head upon my bed, and behold a watcher, and a holy One, came downe from Heaven, He cryed aloud and said thus; Hew downe the tree, and cut off his branches, shake off his leaves, and scatter his fruit, &c. This Allegory may be ren­dred in the plaine words of Eliphaz, I cursed his habitation, his children are far from safety. The Master of the Family is the tree, His children are either fruit or branches, His leaves are riches and honour, the beauty and pleasantnesse of his habitation.

Some things in the letter of the text are to be opened, but I shall first observe one thing in the generall, from the connection of this fourth verse with the third, I suddenly cursed his habitation (verse 3.) Then follows, his children are far from safety. Observe from it; That

Creatures cannot stand before the curse of God. How strong­ly soever they are rooted, the blast of the breath of Gods displea­sure, will either blow them downe, or wither them standing. The curse comes powerfully, suddenly and secretly, it is often an invi­sible stroake. When we see neither axe nor spade at the roote, nor strome at rhe top, yet downe it comes, or stands without leafe or fruit. When Christ in the Gospell curst the fruitlesse figg-tree, his Disciples passing by that way, wondred saying, how quickly is [Page 197] this figg-tree whithered? it was but onely a word from Christ, Ne­ver beare fruit more, and the fig-tree which had no fruit, lost its life. Some are such tall Cedars, such mighty Oakes, that men con­clude there is no stirring of them, no Axe can fell them, or blast loosen them; yet a word from the Lord will turne them up side downe: or if he doe but say to them, never fruit grow upon your actions or out of your counsels, presently they wither. The curse causlesse shall not come, but when there is a cause, and God speaks the word, the curse will come; Neither power nor policies, nei­ther threatnings or entreaties can hinder or block it up. It is said of the water of jealousie in the booke of Numbers, that when the woman dranke that water, if there were cause of her husbands sus­pition, presently her belly swel'd, and her thighes did rot, the effect was inevitable. So, if God bid judgement take hold of a man, family or Nation, it will obey. A word made the world, and a word is able to destroy it. There is no armour of proofe against the shot or stroake of a curse.

Suddenly I cursed his habitation, and the next news is, His children are far from safety; If God speake the word, it is done as soone as spoken; as that mysterious Letter said of the Gun-pou­der plot, As soone as the paper is burnt, the thing is done. Surely God can cause his judgements to passe upon his implacable ene­mies, such horrid conspiratours against Churches and Common­wealths, truth and peace, with as much speed, as a paper burns; with a blaze and a blast they are consumed. That in the generall from the connexion of these two verses: Assoone as he was cursed, his children and his estate, all that he had went to wrack, and ruine. I shall now open the words distinctly.

His children are far from safety,] Some reade, Were far from safety, (and so the whole passage in the time past) because he speaks of a particular example, which he himself had observe [...] in those daies, as is cleare v. 2.

Having shewed the curse upon the eoot, he now shews the wi­thering of the brauches.

Some of the Rabbins understand, by Children; the Followers or Imitators of wicked men, such as assisted them, or such as were like them. These are morall children; but take it rather in the letter, for naturall children, such as were borne to them, or adopted by them, these come under their fathers unhappinesse. They are far from safety.

The Hebrew word is commonly rendred, salvation. His chil­dren are farre from salvation. But then we must understand it for temporall salvation, which our translation expresses clearely by safety. His children are farre from safety. It is possible that the children of a wicked man, may be neare unto eternall salvation; Though godly parents have a promise for their seed, yet grace doth not runne in a bloud, neither is the love of God tied or entayl'd up­on any linage of men. Election sometimes crosses the line, and steps into the family of a reprobate father. Therefore, it is not said, His children are farre from salvation, in a strict, but in a large sence. We find the word salvation, frequently used for safetie (2 Kings 13. 17.) when Elisha bad Joash the King of Is­rael shot the arrow, he called it, the arrow of the Lords salvati­on, which we render, the arrow of the Lords deliverance. So Moses bespeakes the trembling Israelites a [...] the red Sea, Stand still and behold the salvation of the Lord, that is, behold what safety the Lord will give you from all these dangers, what deliverance from the hand of Pharaoh. The Prophet represents the Jewes thus be­moaning their outward judgements. We roare all like Beares, and mourne sore like Doves, we looke for judgement, but there is none, for salvation, but it is farre off, Isa. 59. 11.

They are far from safety.

To be far from safety, is a phrase importing extreame danger; As when a man is said to be far from light, he is in extreame dark­nesse; and when a man is said to be far from health, he is in ex­treame sicknesse; and when a man is said to be far from riches, he is in extreame poverty: So here, His children are far from safety, that is, they are in extreame danger and perill, they walk (as it were) in the regions of trouble, in the valley of the shadow of death continually. That phrase is used also, respecting the spiritu­all estate of unbeleevers, They are far off from God, far off from the Covenant, Isa. 57. 19. Ephes. 12. 13. that is, they have no benefit by the Covenant, no interest in, no favour at all or mer­cy from the Lord. To be far off from mercy is to be neare wrath, and to be far from safety is to dwell upon the borders of danger.

And they are crushed in the gate.

In the forth Chapter Eliphaz describes man, as crushed before [Page 199] the moth, to shew how suddenly, how easily man is destroyed. This mans children are crushed in the gate, as a man would crush a flie or a moth between his fingers.

They are crushed in the gate.

That notes two things.

First the publikenesse of their destruction, they shall be destroy­ed in the sight of all men; for the gate was a publike place (Pro- 31. 31.) her workes praise her in the gates, that is, she is publike­ly knowne by her good works. To doe a thing in the gate is oppo­sed to the doing of a thing secretly. To suffer in the gate is to suffer publikely.

Secondly, to be crushed in the gate, is to be crushed or cast in judgement; for The gate was the place of old, where justice was Inportis judicia exercebantur. Merc. administred and judgement given; and for a man to be crushed in the gate, is as much as for a man to be overthrowne in his sure, when he hath any controversie or tryall before a Judge, whether for his estate or for his life. So this phrase, They are crushed in the gate, implies that all businesses shall goe against them, if they have any controversie in law, or if they be charged with any crime they shall certainly be condemned.

I need not stay to prove that judgement was given in the gate; onely take a few texts. First, in this booke (Chap. 29. 7.). Job describes his owne prosperity thus, When I went out to the gate, that is, to sit in judgement; And Chap. 31. v. 21. the word is used in the like sense; So Gen. 23. 17. Chap. 34. 20. Ruth 4. 1. Isa. 29. 11. Those words of the curse, Psal. 109. 7. when he is judged, let him be condemned, are the full Exposition of this, They are crush­ed in the gate. Ne agricola li­tis causa veni­ens, civitatis frequentia & novo terreretur conspectu nec u [...]bi habitator, longè ab urbi properaret & subvectionem. quaereret jumen. torum Jerom in Amos c. 5. v. 10.

And the reason given by one of the Ancients, why justice was usually administred in the gate, is the accommodation and conve­nience both of strangers and Citizens: For strangers, who lived far off in the country, that they might have justice, before they entred into the city, whose pompe and throngs of people might possibly occasion either some terrour or diversion in the minds of poore country-men. And then likewise, that the Inhabitants of the City, might not be either charged or tired with long journies into the country; To which we may adde, that judgement was therefore administred in the gate, because gates are places through which all passe in and out, and therefore the declaring of judge­ment [Page 200] there, was the making of it more publike, that all might take notice of what passed, in such and such cases, as the sentence and re­solution of the Judges.

Neither is there any to deliver them.

This is the third degree of evill falling upon the foolish mans children. Though a man be brought to and cast in judgement, yet An summis ma­lis reminem habebunt asse [...]to [...]è Ʋe injusti con [...]un [...]ibuntur & contundebuntur in judi iopub [...] [...]e co [...]am tribu­na [...]ibus. he may have a friend to help and deliver him; but these shall have no help, none to speak a good word for them, none to mediate ei­ther for reprieve or pardon. Some give the sense thus, His chil­dren shall neither finde a Judge to give a favourable sentence, nor an Advocate to pleade for them, and make the best of their cause; This also answers another part of the curse, Psa. 109. 12. Let there be none to extend mercy to him, neither let there be any to favour his fatherlesse children; None shall be found either able or wil­ling to rescue or pluck them out of the hand of danger.

Hence observe, first,

That a wicked man and his children are often wrapt up in the same destruction.

I cursed his habitation and his children are far from safety, they are crushed in the gate. A godly man is a defence for his chil­dren; Liberi paren [...]ū poenis saepe im­plicantur. It is a great blessing to be born of holy parents, and it is a curse to be borne of oppressing wicked parents. As, the blessing of God descends from the father, upon the children; so, the curse of God many times descends from the father, upon the children, and they inherit their judgements, as well as their lands. Though the justice and goodnesse of God, will make that Proverbe cease in all the families of the world for ever, which was once taken up by the Jews, Ezek. 18. 2. The Fathers have eaten sowre grapes, and the childrens teeth are set on edge. The Naturalists observe, and ex­perience teacheth, that when a man eats very sowre grapes (and so makes a sowre face) another standing by is affected with a sym­pathy, [...] di­catur a philoso­phis. Aristot. Sect [...]. prob quest 5. and his teeth are set an edge or pained with the very sight or grating of anothers teeth, though himselfe taste not the grape. The present Jewes thought themselves but bare lookers on upon their fathers sin, and yet they suffered. But the Lord found the sowre grapes in their mouths also, or them risen up in their fathers stead, an increase of sinfull men to fill up the fierce wrath of the Lord against them. Now (I say) though the Lord will make that proverbe cease, in their sence: For no child is punished meerely [Page 201] in contemplation of his fathers sin. Yet when a sonne is wicked, the wickednesse of a father, whether immediate or further off, may come in remembrance against him, and at once aggravate his sin, and encrease his sorrow. Secondly, note this from it,

Whom God will destroy, no creature shall be found able to deliver out of his hands.

God can take away the help, and stop up the pity of all creatures, None shall deliver them. And though themselves should endea­vour to escape, they shall not escape (Amos 9. 1.) They that flie shall not flie away, and they that escape shall not be delivered, that is, by endeavouring to escape, they shall not be delivered, they shall attempt it in vaine. If God will not deliver, none can, If a Lot be taken prisoner He bids Abraham arme and rescue him. If a Paul be in the mouth of a Lyon, the Lord will deliver him. It needs not trouble us, who is our enemy, if God will be our deliverer: nor can it availe what friends so ever we have, if God saith, ye shall not be delivered; A wicked man (when the Lord appeares against him) either hath none to deliver him, or none shall. Salvation is farre from the wicked, for they keep not thy statutes, Ps. 119. 155. From the children, judgement proceeds to the estate of this wicked man.

Verse 5. Whose harvest the hungry eateth up, and fetcheth it even out of the thornes, and the robber spoyleth all his substance.

Whose harvest the hungry eateth up.

By his Harvest, we are to understand not only the return of that which he hath sown, as corn and other fruits of the earth; but all the goods or provisions, which he hath gathered or laid up for his Messis nomine parata bona omnia to [...]elligi­tur condenda & reponenda in annos plurimot. support and accommodation. A mans harvest is the improve­ment of his whole estate. And this mans harvest is all he hath got­ten, by right or wrong, by industry or by injury, by sweat or by deceit, by secret practises or open violences. To eat up a harvest, is as much as to devoure a house, with which Christ charges the hungry Scribes and Pharisees (Math. 23. 14.) who made Beggars as fast as they made Prayers, Ye devoure widdows houses and un­der pretence make long prayers.

The greatnesse of his affliction is set forth by the losse of those things, which cost much paines to get. A harvest is not had with idlenesse. The earth must be broken, plowed and sowed before we reape. The law of Nations (I am sure of this Nation) is ve­ry [Page 202] tender in this point, providing, that they who till and sow the Land, shall also enjoy the crop. But this wicked man shall not reape what he sowed. The labour shall be his, and the benefit a­nother mans. The hungry shall come and eate up his harvest. Whence observe in generall.

It is a great evill when we cannot enjoy the thing we labour for.

What greater disappointment to the husband-man; then to de­prive him of his harvest. Poets have sung this in mournfull verse. And we find this threatned in the law, as the very sting of those Impius haec tam culia novalia miles habebit? Barbarus has segetes? en que is consev [...]mus a­gros? Virg. Egl. 1. evills, which should come upon a disobedient people, Deut. 28. 33. The fruit of thy land and all thy labours, shall a Nation which thou knowest not, eat up; All thy labours, that is, The fruits for which thou hast laboured, shall be eaten up by strangers. And (Levit. 26. 16.) Yee shall sow your seed in vaine, for your enemies shall eat it. The sloathfull man resteth not that which he tooke in hunting, so we translate, Prov. 12. 26. But it seemes not so proper to the sence of this proverb. A sloathfull man is not usually a hun­ter, That sport requires an active spirit. And usually men that are slow at worke, are quick at meat, and will not loose their veni­son for the roasting. Therefore more properly (I conceive with others) to the originall, and fully to the point in hand, it may be translated thus, Deceit or the deceitfull man shall not roast his hun­ting, or▪ that which he hath taken in hunting. That is, he shall Non aduret fraudulentia, (sive vir dolo­sus) venationem suam. Ari [...]s Mont. Pagn. not take pleasure in that, which he hath got by extreame pains (as all hunters doe) or by craft and stealth, as some hunters doe. Some­what comes between his mouth and his morsell, his cup and lip, either he cannot get his meat to his table, or he rises hungry from it. Therefore Salomon puts a great blessing in this, when a man enjoyeth his labour, Eccles. 2. 10. My heart rejoyced in all my la­bour, and this was my portion of all my labour, namely, the fruit and benefit which God gave me by my labour; I enjoyed it, and this was my portion. Againe (Eccles. 3. 13.) And also that eve­ry man should eat and drinke, and [...]oy the good of all his labour, it is the gift of God; He puts the Emphasis upon this, when a man hath taken pains to lay in provisions for a comfortable subsistence, that then he may sit downe quietly and enjoy it, It is the gift of God. Therefore on the other hand, not to eate and drinke, and en­joy the good of our labours, but to have all violently snatcht from our mouthes. It is the judgement of God. This judgement the Prophet also threatens (Isa. 1. 6.) Your land strangers shall de­voure [Page 203] it, in your presence; when you are looking on, strangers shall devoure it, Thou preparest a Table before me in the presence of my enemies, saith David, Psal. 23 5. As it is one of the greatest out­ward mercies, to eat at a Table, prepared in the presence of an ene­my, so, it is one of the greatest afflictions, to have an enemy eat up what is prepared for our Table, in our presence, (Mic. 6. 15.) Thou shalt sow, but thou shalt not reape, thou shalt tread the Olives, but thou shalt not anoint thee with oyle, and sweet wine, but shalt not drinke wine. Observe how he puts in their labour to aggravate their sor­row. If they had not sowne, it had not been so troublesome, not to reape, if they had not trod the Olives, it had not been so grievous to have had no oyle; but this was their calamity, they sowed, but reaped not, they trod the Olives, but had no oyle to annoint them­selves. The misery of that rich man (Lu [...]. 12.) is thus described, when he had made larger barnes, and got in his harvest, when he had made provision for many yeares, then the Question is, Whose shall all these things be that thou hast provided? The rich man was not unprovided of an answer to the Querie long before. Whose shall they be? Mine own I warrant you. I am not such a foole to take pains for others. Little did he thinke his grave was a making while he was making his barns: Or, that all his providence and care should redound to strangers. How will it cut the heart to see all those things taken away, in and about which, a man hath laid out his whole strength, and laid up his whole heart. This Job impre­cates as the extremity of all outward evils, in case he were an hy­pocrite, and dealt falsely with God (Chap. 31. 8) If any blot hath cleaved to my hands, that is, if this blot of insincerity (Job did not thinke himselfe to be without all blot of sinne, but, if such a blot as I am charged with) cleave to my hands, then let me sow, and let another eat. This judgement which Eliphaz hints at in another per­son, as already fallen on Job for his hypocrisie, Job, in his own per­son cals for, if he were an hypocrite. Let me sow and let another eate, yea let my off-spring be rooted out.

Whose harvest the hungry eateth up. The hungry.

There is some difference in opinion, who are to be understood by the hungry. Some take this hungry one for the Devill; He is a hungry one indeed: but his hunger is not after our riches but after our soules, 'tis them he goes about like (a hungry) roaring Lyon, seeking to devoure. (2 Pet. 5. 8.) It is a truth also, that Satan goes about as a hungrie one to devoure our estates, so he did Jobs, His [Page 204] harvest that hungry one did eat up, but, it was not because he desired Jobs harvest, but because he gaped for Job Himselfe. He thought if God would but give him leave to rob Job of his riches, Job would quickly let his soule lapse into his hands. A soule is the dainty morsell, which That hungry spirit waits for. The most delicate things in the world are meate too grosse for a spirit, though an un­cleane one.

Others, by the hungry one, understand the Heire of this rich worldling; His heire whom he had kept low, and bare and short, as long as he lived, now, when he is dead and gone, comes hungry to the estate, and quickly consumes it; he eats it out, drinks it up and lavisheth it away. It is often seen that the heires of great, rich men come very hungry to their inheritances, and as quickly swal­low them downe. They have been kept so short, that like emp­ty and sharpe set stomackes they waste all, when they come where they may have their fill. That estate which is got by the oppression, and kept by the base covetousnesse of parents, is usually spent out in riot and luxurie. A hungry heire devours the harvest.

Thirdly, The hungry, may be taken for those poore oppressed ones, whose estates those Nimrods of the world had unjustly and cruelly ravisht from them. They, whom wicked men make hun­gry and leane by their exactions and cruell dealings, come at last (though unbidden and unwelcome guests) to eat the bread from their Tables. And these poore Hungry-ones are conceived by some to be Wisedomes children, the people of God, whom those wicked fooles had stript of their estates, and would have eaten them too like bread, Psal. 14. So the Septuagint renders it, The just or [...]. the godly shall eat up or devoure the harvest of this rich worldling. Put both these together, and this may be the sense, The hungry eat­eth up his harvest, that is, the godly poore, whom this man had unjustly opprest, and even put to starving, God, by his just judge­ment shall send in, to take free Quarter, to eat their fill of his har­vest, and never reckon with their host.

From that sence take this note,

That God doth sometimes give the riches of wicked men to poore godly men, whom they have opprest.

Job himselfe, Chap. 27. v. 16. gives us this truth in expresse termes, where speaking of a wicked man, he saith, Though he heap up silver as the dust, and prepare raiment as the clay, he may pre­pare it (let him prepare it, let him scrape it together as fast as he [Page 205] can) but the just shall put it on, and the innocent shall divide the silver, that is, those just and innocent persons whom he had wron­ged, shall by a divine retaliation enter upon his estate. The wicked grind the faces of the poor, to make themselves bread, but at last the poore shall make bread of their corn and griest.

We may see the tract and foot-steps of this judgement in our dayes; How many sons of violence, who have made many persons, yea, families hungry, naked and desolate, are now made desolate and naked? God hath so wrought, and answered us by terrible things in righteousnesse, that Oppressed Innocents have been put into the houses, and have fed upon the fatnesse of Ʋnrighteous Op­pressours. Must we not say, verily there is a God that judgeth the earth, when we see this vengeance? And for the rest, may we not say as those searchers of Canaan, (Caleb and Joshua) made their report, when the rest complained of impossibilities, Numb. 14. 9. Let us not feare them, for they are bread for us, that is, we shall easi­ly get in amongst them, and live upon their estates: Let us not feare those giantly sons of Anak, who have fleec'd the poore of Gods flock, and knaw'd their bones, for (by the power and justice of God) they are bread for us; they have made hungry ones enow to eate up their own harvest.

Fourthly, We may take the hungry, yet more largely; for any In communi quicun (que) raptor & depraedator famelicus ap­pellatur. Pined that are low and poore, whom God stirres up and sends in judge­ment as his teeth, to consume and eate up, to devoure and destroy the portion of such fat ones. Every spoiler is a hungry one; spoi­lers devoure as if they had never eaten in their lives, they sweep all away: The word which we translate to eate up, signifies the most fierce kind of eating: when a man eates, as if he could never have enough. And therefore it is applied to the eating of fire, which we know is the most hungry thing in the world; nothing will sa­tisfie [...] Est acrius quam nostrum comedere, signi­ficat enim cōe­dē [...]o consumere. Ingentem avi­ditatem come­dentis prae se­sert, adeo ut de igne quae omnia avidè depascit utatur. the appetite of that hungry element, the more it eates, the more hungry and devouring it is. Hence that adjunct of fire (Isa. 29. 6.) A flame of a devouring fire, or, the flame (it is the word of the text) of an eating fire; a fire whose stomack is able to di­gest all the materiall creatures in the world. So (Job 1.) it is said, that the fire of God, or a great fire did eate up the sheepe, the fire came hungry and consumed them; such is the force of the word here used; and secondly, it is applied in Scripture, to the eating of the sword; which (alas!) we know is very hungry too, My sword shall devoure flesh, Deut. 32. 42. Thirdly, it is applied to sa­vage [Page 206] beasts (Gen. 37. 33.) when Jacob bewaileth the losse of his sonne Joseph, he saith, an evill beast hath devoured him. Fourth­ly, the cruelty of persecutors (in whom wild beasts, and sword and fire are all met, if not swallowed up.) The cruelty, I say, of per­secutors is expressed by this word, They eate up my people like bread, Psal. 14. 4. Wild beasts, and sword, and fire, and above all the per­secuting spirits of men, are the most hungry and speedy devourers, such a devouring shall consume the harvest of these foolish men, The hungry shall eate it up: Here we may observe, That

They who consume others shall at last be consumed themselves.

Such as have raised themselves upon the ruines of others, shall raise others by their own ruine. God will send devourers to eate up the estate of those, who have devoured the estates of their bre­thren; especially, if they have devoured the estates of his own people. The Apostle, Gal. 6. 7. gives this generall law, Whatsoe­ver a man soweth, that shall he also reape. He that sowes oppression, or makes his seed-time, to be the reaping of his neighbours har­vest, may find reapers, which he hired not, in his field at harvest. The Prophet Isaiah denounceth a woe against those, that joyne house to house by oppression, and what is the woe? their houses shall be made desolate; So Zeph. 3. 19. I will undoe all that afflict there. And Jer. 30. 16. They that devoure thee shall be devoured; and they that spoile thee shall be a spoile, and all that prey upon thee will I give for a prey; It is just with God (2 Thes. 1. 6.) to re­compence tribulation to them that trouble you. The rich man who hoards up that for himselfe and for his children, which he hath pul­led out of the bellies of others, shall have his meate devoured from his table, and pul'd from between his teeth.

The hungry eate up his harvest, but where doth he find it? He takes it even out of the thornes.

There is some difficulty in that expression. Mr Broughton reades it, The hungry shall eate up his harvest which he had gotten thorough the thornes! And others thus, he shall fetch it out from among the [...] Spinae, aliqui deducunt a [...] unde [...] scutum, clipeus. armes or weapons. The Hebrew word which we translate thornes, gives occasion of these various readings, which some derive from Tsinnah, which signifies a shield, and so by a trope, it notes any kind of armes or weapons.

If we take the word in the first sense, for thornes, a three-fold interpretation may be given of this clause.

First as Mr Broughton reades it, which he had gotten thorough [Page 207] the thornes. This refers to the manner how a worldling obtaines his estate; he hath a great harvest, and how came he by it? he got it thorough the thornes; that is, he got it thorough vexing, prick­ing cares, for so (Mat. 13.) in the Parable of the sower, when Christ expounds the meaning of the thorny ground, he shewes, that the thornes are cares, the cares wherewith men are vexed in getting riches, or compassing the things of the world. Hence a man is said to get riches thorough the thornes, when he gets them tho­rough overmuch care and vexation of spirit.

Secondly, As the word signifies thornes: some conceive, that Eliphaz closely describes the persons who should take away his estate, as he did in the former branch; there he said, the hungry eate up his harvest; now he describeth another sort of men that shall eate it up, namely, Men of thornes, or Men comming out of the thornes; This rendring, is not easily made out of the Originall, though, it hath learned a bettors, and therefore I am not confident of it; yet it may yeeld some advantage to our meditation upon the words. The meaning is this: Meane or contemptible men shall Homo ex spinis exiens, sc. abie­ctus & con­temptus eum rapiet. Homo ignobilis qui de spinis nasci­tur. Merc. take it away: As in our language, when we would expresse a vul­gar person, a man of low birth, we say, he was borne under a bush; or under a hedge, that is, he is a man of a low pedigree, none of the Gentry; and so it is, as if he should say, this great, rich, mighty man, who hath so much honour and riches about him, and thinks himselfe safe, shall see a man comming out of the thornes, some obscure person, and take all that he hath from him. This expositi­on may yeeld us a profitable observation, That

When God reckons with the greatest of wicked men, hee can humble and pull them downe by the meanest and poorest of men. A very shrub, a man that comes out of the thornes may pull downe the tallest Cedar; It encreases affliction, to be overcome by a weake, despised, inconsiderable enemy. It troubled Abi­melech more to be slaine by a woman, than to be slaine; and there­fore (upon the matter) he would have the paine to be twice kil'd, rather than the disgrace to be kil'd by a woman; for having recei­ved his deaths-wound by her hand, yet, he calls hastily to the young man his Armour-bearer, and said unto him; draw out thy sword now, and slay me, that men say not of me, a woman slew him, Judg. 10. 54. The Lord threatens it, both as a just retaliation for the sin, and an aggravation of the punishment of his people, I will move them to jealousie with those that are not a people, I will [Page 208] provoke them to anger with a foolish Nation, Deut. 32. 21. The Gentiles, as Paul expounds this place, Rom. 10. 19. and Peter, 1 Peter 2. 10.) whom the Jewes sleighted as a foolish people, as no people, came in and eate up the harvest of the Gospell, and were invested with greater priviledges than they. This made the Jewes mad with anger, as you may reade in that famous record of it, Acts 22. ver. 21, 22. They could not beare it, that, Those men of the thornes, should partake of the fatnesse of the Olive. As Jotham spake in his Parable, (Judg. 9 15.) when the question was, which of the trees should be King, the olive or the vine, &c. at last it fell to the brambles lot, or to the thorne. That parable gives some light to this exposition: For those severall sorts of trees shadow­ed out the severall sorts of men, and the bramble shadowed out the meanest sort of men; a man of thornes, or a man comming out of the thornes. And he adds (which further answers this sense) Let fire come out of the bramble, and devoure the Cedars of Laba­non; which in plaine English is, let there come power from a powerlesse man, who is but as a bryer, or as a thorne, and consume the greatest and the mightiest.

And it may support us (while we see so many great Cedars and strong Okes, with whom we have to doe) that God can send a man out of the thornes to subdue their pride; and can cause a bramble to consume Cedars, when himselfe pleaseth, The Pro­phet Amos puts the question, By whom shall Jacob rise, for he is small? The onely answer is, Jacob hath a great God, a God that can doe great things: If we should question, by whom shall the wicked fall, for they are very great? I answer, haply, they shall fall by him, that is very small, A man out of the bushes, a man of thornes, some poore shrub, armed with the power of God, shall shake and overthrow them in the height of all their wickednesse and worldly glory.

Thirdly, Take it according to our reading: He shall fetch it out of the thornes. Which some interpret, to be thornes growing na­turally in or among the corne; according to that generall curse upon the earth, Gen. 3. 18. Thornes and thistles shall it bring forth to thee. But rather (if not alone) these are thornes platted to­gether industriously, and wrought into a hedge, to save corne fields or corne-stackes from spoile. So the meaning is, that when the hungry man comes with a commission from God, to eate the har­vest of the foolish, he will have his estate whatever it costs him, [Page 209] or what danger soever he incurres for it. For, as a man is said to fetch a thing out of the fire, or out of the Lions mouth, when he E spinis, hoc est, è magno periculo: sicut nos dicimus ex ore Leonum. Drus. gets it with much perill and hazzard; so, what a man gets with much difficulty and labour, he is said to get it out of the thornes. And the reason is this, because, men were wont, when they had ga­thered in their harvest (take it especially about that, and in pro­portion about any thing else) they were then wont (I say) to se­cure Quamvis inter spinas abdita sit & forsan ut tutior sit. Merc. it with a thorn-hedge, or to lay bushes about their stacks, to keep off cattle or any other annoyances. We read among the Lawes given by Moses, somewhat answerable to this practice, Exod. 22. 6. If fire breake out and catch in thornes, so that the stacks of corne, or standing corne, or the field be consumed there­with, he that kindled the fire, shall make restitution. This Law in­timates it for an ancient custome, to make fences of thornes about corne brought home or stackt up; And that fields while the corne was standing, were hedged about with thornes. To either of which, the allusion may be made by Eliphaz: So that, to fetch his harvest out of the thorns, is to fetch it through the fences made to secure his harvest, to fetch it, though it cost (as we speak prover­bially) a scratcht face, or scratcht fingers. We say, hunger breaks through stones walls, certainly then these hungry ones, will break through a thorne hedge.

When the Lord would keep his Church from wandring in sin­full paths, he resolves thus, Hos. 2. 6. I will hedge up her way with thornes: there are pleasures that she would goe fetch, but as men fence their ground and pastures with thornes, so will I doe with her, I will hedge up her way with thornes, she shall pay dear, she shall smart for her pleasures, ere she come at them. And therefore, as it shewes the extreame intensivenesse and resolvednesse of a man to sin; when a man will sin, though God hath hedged up his way with thorns, that is, when a man will break thorough many dan­gers, and run hazzards to satisfie his lusts; so here in this place, the hungry mans taking it out of the thornes, notes a resolvednesse and eagernesse of spirit, to have the estate of this rich man, let him secure it by all the power and policies he can.

From this Exposition, we may observe first, the practice of worldly wise men; when they have gotten riches, they doe not leave them loose and open to surprisall, they keep them among the thornes; they will secure their estates as much as they can. As they get riches with thorns, so they will keep riches with thorns, [Page 210] that is, they will bestow care to keep, as well as to get: A godly man takes great care to get more of Christ, more riches of grace, he improves all means, and makes this his businesse night and day; these spirituall cares are his thornes: and when he finds his stock of holy things increasing, his next care is to preserve his stock, to maintaine communion with Christ, and to keep up his graces to their height; The care of a godly man, is as much to preserve grace and comforts from the power of that hungry one the Devill, as it was to fetch them in. And Satan is so hungry after our spirituall harvest, that, he would fetch it out of the thorns and fences of all our prayers and holy cares, were it not that Christ himselfe keeps it for us, His care over his peoples spirituall welfare is such a thorn hedge, as the Devill can never break thorough; We are kept by the power of God as with a garrison, 1 Pet. 1. 5.

Such also, is the wisdome of that generation, about worldly things: they fence in, and fortifie their riches, so that if any man will have them, he must have them through the thornes, or come upon the pikes.

Secondly, Though he lay up his estate within the thorns, yet, the hungry man will fetch it out. Note then,

That all the care of worldly men, all the thorne-hedges they make about their estates, shall never secure them from spoyle and ruine. The hungry will presse and venture through the thorns to take them.

Further, As the word signifies a Buckler (or any kind of arms, whether offensive or defensive) as the text is by some translated, He shall fetch it out of their Armes, or from among their weapons. De Armis [...]ol­let eam, sc. messem. Et ipsum rapiet armatus. Vulg. And then, the sence may be thus conceived (which agrees fully with the former Observation)

Though, this wicked man in his high estate, should get many ar­med men together to defend it, yea though he should get an Army of men, with sword and buckler, with pike and shot to defend it, yet none of them shall be able. The wrath of God, by the man out of the thornes, the meanest instrument of his wrath, shall break through all And in allusion to this, the vulgar (more truely then as a translation) reads it,

The armed man shall take him away, that is, he shall carry him away prisoner, and spoyl him of his harvest: Which, though it doth not comply with the letter of the Original, yet it implies the sence of it. For when Armed men come to take any thing away, it inti­mates, [Page 211] that the thing was, or was supposed to be protected with armes. The Chaldee paraphrase saith the same: Souldiers with Quod juxta tex [...]um Hebra­icum extaret, de armis ra­piet, vertit vulgaris Bib­lia, rapier ar­matus, non e­nim nisi arma­tus prssit de me­dio armorum eam rapere. Bold. Milites armis sivi instrumen­tis bellicis ab­ducent eos. Chald. Erunt exercitus vos cingentes. Chald. Bibent f [...]ientes divitias eju [...]s. Vulg. [...] vel à [...] s [...]ire, vel à [...] quod est capil­lus aut caesa­ries Praedo sic dictus, quod mo­re ferino capil­los nutriet, ut mos est in ter­ra Ismael. Rab. Dav. Kinchi in lib Rad. Tsammim, prae­de, quem sic ap­pellarum existi­mant, à coma, quam alit, vel quod sangui­nem humanum fitiat. Drus. weapons and warlike instruments shall carry them away. This word is in other places rendred An Army, in the Chaldee. So Josh. 23. 15. That which we translate, They shall be thornes in your eyes: The Chaldee glosseth thus; They shall be an Army besieging or compassing you round about. And so much for the second branch of this verse. He taketh it even out of the thornes.

There is a third branch: And the robber swalloweth up their substance.

It is the same in substance with the former, and we may say here as Joseph about the dreams of Pharoah, The dreames are the same, and they are doubled, onely to note the certainty of the thing: The matter here is the same, onely the words are doubled (as the Holy Ghost often doth) to note the certainty of this thing, that the foo­lish mans estate shall be consumed.

Yet, there is somewhat very considerable in the phrase here u­sed, and therefore I shall open it a little; The robber swalloweth up his substance.

The robber.] Some translate, the thirsty shall drink or swallow up their substance; Mr. Broughton, the thirsty shall swill up their wealth; And it suites fairely with the former words, there the hungry shall eate up his harvest, and here, the thirsty shall swill up their wealth; so you have both the hungry and the thirsty to make riddance of all; neither his corn, nor his wine, his bread nor his drink, neither wet nor dry, shall escape, where both hungry and thirsty come to consume.

We render it, The robber swalloweth up their substance. The reason of this difference is from the Originall word, which may have a double derivation: First from a root, signifying to thirst or to be thirsty: Secondly from a root which signifies the haire of the head, or the locks, or extraordinary ruffian-like long haire and locks. And the reason, why we translate Robber, is given from both: From the first, because robbers and spoylers are commonly Tosse pots and drunkards, men that love their liquor, a thirsty ge­neration in that sence; and they alwayes thirst for a prey, they thirst for the estates or lives of others: From the latter, because robbers, plunderers and spoilers, usually wore very long haire, either to disguise or make themselves the more terrible; So that a robber may be denominated, both from his unnaturally naturall [Page 212] thirst after the pot, and from his uncivilly civill thirst after a purse, or from his long, shaggy, bushy haire: To this latter sence, one of Absorbea [...] pilc­s [...] divitias eo­rum. Rab. Mordo [...]hai. Horridus. H [...]spidus. [...] Propriè a [...] ­traxit per na­res, aut os: trax it aërem ad os; Per Metapho­ram, inhiavit, ardenter cupijt, qui enim arden­ter aliquid cu­piunt; pre de­siderij magnitu­dine, ad os ae [...]em frequen­tius [...]r [...]hunt seu respirant. the Rabbins translates, The hairy man, or the man with long haire, shall swallow up their estates; Hence some expresse him by a Latine word, which signifies a man all overgrown with haire; This Ruffian or Robber shall swallow up his substance.

Swallow up] The word notes an utter exhaustion, he shall ex­haust his substance: As we say, when a spender or an unthrift is described, He hath exhausted his estate, he hath, as it were suckt it up, guzl'd or swallowed it down his throat; the radicall word may import, drawing or sucking up with a pipe; properly it sig­nifies, to fetch wind, or draw breath; and by a metaphor to swal­low down, to sup or suck up; as also, with fervency and pleasure to desire, because vehement desires are often exprest by quick breathings, yea, to breath after a thing, is to desire it; or it notes a mind to swallow it up, either from the delight we have in it, or hatred of it. In which latter sence Daved applies it to his enemies (Psal. 56. 2.) Mine enemies would daily swallow me up. They breath after me, to devoure me. So then the meaning is; This robber, this hairy spoyler or thirsty one, will be so dry that he will swallow all up, he will soop and drink up the foolish mans estate to the very bottome; he will draw it down to the very dreggs or lees, and not leave a drop behind him.

The robber swalloweth up their substance.

In the first chapter we read Job described, A man of a very [...] Non magis ad corporis quam ad ingenij vi­res pertinet: & tres sere virtu­tes continet, fortitudinem, justitiam, pru­dentiam. great substance, Job's subsistance in cattle was thus and thus: Here also it is said, The robber shall swallow up his subsistance; but the word in the Hehrew, is very different from that in the first chapter; there the word signifieth properly substance in cattle; but here it signifies, substance in any kind of wealth or riches what­soever; And it notes three things.

First, and most properly, strength, either strength of body or of mind, namely, valour, activity and courage, also wisdome and in­dustry to get or defend our substance; So Gen. 47. 6. Pharoah tells Joseph, that if among his brethren, there were any men of acti­vity, he should make them rulers over his cattell. [...]

Secondly, It notes riches and wealth, or any worldly substance; because much activity, wisdome and strength, is usually imployed in obtaining them; or because both wisdome and strength are re­quisite [Page 213] for the keeping and retaining of them, (Prov. 11. 16.) Strong men retaine riches: as if he should say, though a man have aboundance of riches, yet if he have not strength, he shall hardly hold them, they will be wrested out of his hands. Once more, Riches are thus exprest, because men, usually account their riches to be their strength, a man naturally puts confidence in his riches; Prov. 13. 15. The rich mans wealth is his strong City; Riches are call [...]d strength, from that corrupt opinion which the world hath of them, making them Idols, and trusting to them, as they should unto God alone. Though yet, there is a truth in it, that Aristoteles di­vi [...]ias appellat vires re [...]um, quia per ipsas o [...]nia possu­mus. lib 1. Po­lit. cap. 8. riches have much strength in them, a rich man, and a powerfull man, are mutually put for each other.

Thirdly, The word signifies an Army of men, Psal. 33. 16. There is no King saved by the multitude of an host: We may take it either way, this hungry man, this robber, shall come and swal­low up his substance, his riches, his strength, or he shall come and swallow up his very Army, by which he thought to defend his sub­stance; All shall be lost, neither the estate, nor the means used to protect the estate, shall stand before this hungry, thirsty, hairy robber. In this description of a totall desolation brought upon the estate and family of the foolish man, together with the character of the persons, who shall make him desolate, questi­onlesse Eliphaz would represent to Job, the desolation brought upon his estate and children, by those troops of hungry, hairy, thirsty robbers, the Chaldeans and the Sabeans, who swallow­ed all his substance at one morsell, soopt up his estate at one draught. Whence observe;

It is a great point of wisdome, to shew a man his condition, in a­nothers, and to seem onely relating the History of our forreign ob­servations, when we meane the person to whom we speak; what is proposed as seen in others, works the heart to see it selfe; and doth at once mitigate the sharpnesse of the reproofe, and open the spirit, to let it in. As we see in the instance of Nathans Parable to David, 2 Sam. 12. Eliphaz said onely, I have seen the foolish taking root, &c. He doth not lay it boysterously and directly upon Job; I saw thee taking root &c.

Thus we have opened the context of these five verses, wherein Eliphaz argues Job of wickednesse and insincerity, because God had dealt with him, as he usually doth with the wicked and infin­cere, whose habitations are cursed, their children crushed, their [Page 214] substance swallowed up, by thirsty, and eaten up, by hungry robbers, who take it out from the very thorns of their own cares, in getting, or means in securing, what they have gotten.

JOB. Chap. 5. Vers. 6, 7, 8.

Although affliction cometh not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground.

Yet man is borne unto trouble as the sparks flie upward.

I would seek unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause.

THus far Eliphaz hath spent his discourse, in reproofe and con­viction; And you have had out of the 4 Chapter, and the precedant part of this, foure heads of reason, or arguments, by which Eliphaz labours to reprove Job, for, and convince him of, close sin, or of grosse hypocrisie. Now Eliphaz turns himself to a­nother stile, and falls to counsell and exhortation, directing and ad­vising Job what becomes him, what he ought to doe, in his condi­tion: His exhortation consists of two distinct branches.

The former whereof begins at this sixth, and is continued to the seventeenth verse of the Chapter. The summe of this exhortation is, That, for as much as he had found him so distempered in his speech and carriage, he now earnestly beseeches and intreats him, that he would seek unto God, beg favour, and believingly commit himselfe and his cause unto God.

The second branch of exhortation begins at the 17 verse, and is continued to the end of the Chapter. The Scope whereof is, That Job would humbly and patiently submit himselfe unto, and under, the correcting hand of God, quietly waiting the time of his deliverance.

The matter of the former exhortation lies in the words of the 8 verse, I would seek unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause.

He strengthneth this exhortation by two arguments, whereof

The first is taken from the cause of his afflictions, and that either the efficient, or the meritorious cause of his afflictions, both which we find in the 6 and 7 verses.

The second argument by which he strengthneth his first exhor­tation, is contained in the 9, 10, 11, and 12 verses following, [Page 215] and it is grounded upon the power, wisdome and goodness of God: As if he should say, Who would not seek unto God, who is of in­finite power, able to deliver? Who would not seek unto a God, and commit his cause unto him, who is gracious, and pittifull, merci­full and ready to deliver? Who would not seeke unto a God, and commit his cause unto him, who is of infinite wisdome to find out wayes and means for the contriving of deliverance, though mans condition (to the eye of sence or humane reason) seem altogether desperate and remedilesse?

These three verses containe the first exhortation, together with the first argument; And we may forme it thus, both respecting the efficient, and the meritorious cause of his afflictions.

First, respecting the efficient cause, the argument seemes to lie thus.

He is to be sought unto in our afflictions, who is the principall effi­cient cause or sender of our afflictions.

But, God is the principall efficient cause and sender of our afflicti­ons.

Therefore, he is to be sought unto, and, to him our cause is to be committed.

The Major or first Proposition, is not expresly in this text, but it is plainly supposed, and logically to be understood. The Minor or the Assumption, lies in the 6 and 7 verses, where he proves that God is the efficient cause or sender of afflictions; And his proof is grounded upon a deniall, or a removall of all other efficient cau­ses. As, if he should say, there must be some efficient cause of affli­ction, but no efficient cause can be assigned or named, except God: therefore God is the efficient cause, the sender and orderer of affli­ctions. That, no other efficient cause can be assigned, he proveth plainly in the sixth verse, thus; Affliction cometh not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground, yet, man is borne to trouble &c. As if he should say, our eyes teach us, we see plainly man is full of trouble; man is no sooner borne, but he is afflicted; these afflictions must have some efficient cause, some hand or other doth frame, forme, and fashion them, they come not alone; and if they come not alone, then, we must find out this cause either in earth or in heaven: we must find it, either in the Creatour or among the creatures, but from the earth, or from creatures, they come not. Affliction cometh not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground, that is, it rises not by or from [Page 216] the creatures in themselves, and alone considered; and if so, it must needs come from heaven, from the hand of God, who dwel­leth above, and disposeth all things according to the pleasure of his own will. It is such a kind of speech, as often falls from us, when a thing is lost; we say, some body must have it; Sure it is not gone into the gound, You or You must have it, for there were none else in the place. So, Eliphaz seems here to argue about the afflicti­ons, which he saw upon Job: here are heavy afflictions upon thee, these afflictions must come some way upon thee, They come not out forth of the dust, neither doe they spring out of the ground, they come not up alone; Either then they must come from God or man; and from man, they come not; they spring not out of the earth: therefore he leaves it as a clear inference, that God is the efficient cause or sender of affliction.

Againe, if we consider this argument, as it strengthneth the ex­hortation from the meritorious cause of his afflictions. It may be formed thus.

If the sin of man be from himselfe, and the sufferings of man be for his sin, then in his sufferings for sin, he ought to seek unto God, and to commit his cause unto him.

But, the sin of man is from himselfe, and the sufferings of man are for his sin.

Therefore, he ought in such a condition to seeke unto God, and commit his cause unto him; For, remedy is no where else to be had. This second argument is grounded rather upon the exposition, then the letter of the text, as shall be further cleared in pursuance of the words.

Thus, you see, how the Minor or second Proposition is confirmed, both, as it respects the efficient cause, and the meritorious cause of mans affliction. The conclusion lies in the 8 verse, which Eli­phaz Conclusi enun­ciata in persona Eliphazi. quod modestum co­hortationis ge­nus magnam vim habet, & est usitatissi­mum, Merl. pronounces in his own person, I would seeke unto God, therefore seek thou unto God, he speakes it in his own person, thereby more freely to insinuate his counsell, and make way for his exhortation. As if he had said, Were I in thy case I would doe so, therefore doe thou so likewise, Seeke unto God and commit thy cause unto him.

So much of this context and the Logick of it, as it contains an ex­hortation, with an argument to strengthen and back that exhorta­tion. Now for the clearing of the words.

[Page 217] Although afflictions come not forth of the dust.

The Hebrew particle, which we translate Although, may be ta­ken three wayes, and so I find it rendred upon this place.

First (which is its most proper sence) it is taken causally, and then the text is read, For, affliction commeth not forth of the dust. So Mr. Broughton, for sorrow issueth not from the dust.

Secondly, It may be taken Adversatively, as we reade it, Al­though affliction or sorrow comes not forth of the dust.

Thirdly, it may be taken Affirmatively, according to which ac­ception the text is thus carried, Certainly, Affliction cometh not out of the dust, or Surely, affliction commeth not out of the dust.

Either of these wayes, the sense is good, yet to me our translati­on by the Adversative Although, doth a little obscure the sense: And to say, Surely or certainly, affliction comes not forth of the dust, seemes to carry it more clearly.

Surely affliction cometh not out of the dust;

It is considerable, that the word by which affliction is here ex­prest, [...] Iniquitas, vani­tas, molestia bi­bor, quia iniqui­tas laborem af­flictionemq par­turit Sept. ver­tunt per [...] & [...] Sclund. beares a double signification in Scripture, and I conceive it may also in this text: properly it signifies sinne, iniquity, iniquity of all sorts, but especially, That sinne of Idolatry; As (Hos. 4. 15.) when the house of God (Bethel,) was polluted with idolatry, the name is changed and it is called Bethaven, the house of an I­doll, or the house of iniquity: or of that speciall iniquity, namely of idolatry; Sinne alters the nature of man, no marvell then, if it alter the names of things, Hos. 10. 15. and often in the old testa­ment [...] Ascendit Eli­phaz ad comu­nem & natura­lem sortem ho­minis quod om­nes [...]n peccato et ad miseriam nascimur, damnati in Adamo Coc we find this word added, to set out the worst of men, the workers of iniquity, Psal. 5. 5. &c. Iniquity comes not out of the dust, the soyle where it grows, or the shop where it is wrought and formed is mans heart. Eliphaz would carry us to the wel-head our sinfull natures, or our birth-sin.

Secondly, the word signifies affliction or sorrow, calamity or misery, because sinne is the cause of affliction, the mother of sor­row: And therefore by a Metonimie of the effect for the cause (which is frequent in Scripture) The same word notes both sinne and sorrow; The mother and the daughter are called by the same name. We translate by the effect, Surely, affliction commeth not out of the dust; Many by the cause, Surely, iniquity comes not out of the dust. And for the full understanding of the text, we must take in both; where the effect only is mentioned, the cause is sup­posed, [Page 218] Affliction springs not out of the dust, because sin springs not out of the dust.

Now this forme of speaking (Iniquity or affliction springs or commeth not forth of the dust) is proverbiall: and no doubt was P [...]ove [...]bialis quaedam senten­tia est, qua tol­lat casum asse­rat (que) divinam e [...]ga res humanas & im [...] ­ru [...] supplic [...]um providentiam. P [...]n [...]d Sanct. well knowne and often used in those times. When they would re­move chance or fortune (as we say) or deny any event to be with­out a certaine directive power, They spake in this language, This came not from the ground; thereupon the vulgar translates it so in termes, Nihil in terra sine causa sit. Vulg. Quasi dicerit non casu ma [...] nabis accidunt, ne (que) ex terra germinant ut solent herbae nullo jacto se­mine. There is nothing in the world without cause, alluding (it is probable) to the Proverbe. Hence a man obscurely borne, whose parents and originall are unknowne, is called Terrae filius. A sonnne of the earth. Which imports, that no man can tell whence he is, or how descen­ded. They whose originall cannot be assigned, are usually assig­ned to the common originall, Mogna parens terra est. or parent of us all, the earth; and as in regard of persons, so of things, when no man can tell how or which way they come, they are said to come out of the ground; We speak also (in the other extreame) affirmatively, Such a thing comes out of the clouds, that is (we know not, but) God knows how it comes. So then, here is a deniall of chance or fortune; As if Eli­phaz should say, reason may be found and assigned for these things, they come not out of the dust.

Further, for the clearing of this, The dust and the ground stand in a two-fold opposition. First unto God, and secondly unto our selves. First in opposition to God thus, Affliction springeth not from the ground, that is, it comes from the wisdome, power and disposition of God, as the efficient cause. Secondly, in opposition to our selves, and then the sense may be thus conceived, that, the materiall and meritorious cause of our affliction, is not without us, N [...]n exi [...] è pul­vere iniquitas, q. d. ab homini­bus est non eter na vol pulvere, nam terra non profert iniqui­tatem sed homi­nes, ea est natura eo [...]um co [...] ­rupta proin & proclives a [...] eā jucuntur. D. us. it is not in the ground or in other creatures, but it is in our selves. Every man in himselfe hath the ground which beares, the source or fountain which bubbles out his sorrowes and his sufferings. Man hath no reason to accuse or charge heaven or earth, as the authors of his sorrow, he carries the reason about with him, The sinfullnes or sinke of his owne polluted nature. And therefore (to allude to that of the Apostle in the point of Justification, Rom. 10. 6, 7.) Say not in thy heart, who shall ascend into heaven, that is to bring thy troubles downe from above, or who shall decend into the deepe, that is to bring up thy troubles from below, for the cause is nigh thee, even in thy mouth and in thy heart, that is, The corruption of nature, which we preach.

The latter branch of this verse, Neither doth trouble spring out of the ground, is of the very same importance with the former, there­fore I shall not need to stay upon it. The word which we translate Trouble signifies properly, toylesome labour, or any laborious toyl [...] accidentall to man in this life, as a fruit of sinne. This doth not spring out of the ground. It is an allusion to plants or herbs, which grow in the open field, without the worke or care of man, and so are opposed to plants or herbes in a garden: As if he should say, Terrâ nata di­cuntur illa, qui­bus nulla ab a­gricolis impensa est opera, ut sū [...] herbae quas [...] ­tro terra fund [...] in pratis & lo­cis incu [...]is. Sa [...]ct. thy troubles are not like those herbes, that grow wild, in the fields, without the labour and paines, the care or art of man. There is some hand or other, that both plants and waters them.

We may ground some observations as the text is read, Iniquity comes not forth of the dust. And then as it is read, Affliction comes not forth of the dust▪ And it is necessary to give it this latitude; the word equally bearing both senses. As it is read, Iniquity comes not, &c. We learn,

First, The materiall cause of sin is in our selves.

We bring forth the fruit at our tongues or fingers ends, and the root is in our hearts. Our sinnes spring not out of the dust, but out of the dirt and filth of our owne corruptions, Gen. 6. 5. Every thought of the imagination of mans heart it is evill, and onely evill, and that continually; the Hebrew is, every figment or every crea­ture in the heart of man, whatsoever a man moulds and fashions within himself, naturally, is evill▪ and nothing but evill, and it is al­wayes so. The naturall births of mans heart have all one common face and feature; They are all of one common constitution. Evill all. Secondly, We may observe, That

The meritorious cause of mans suffering is from his sinne.

Iniquity springeth not from the ground, neither doth trouble come out of the dust. As iniquity springs from our selves, so we may resolve it, that misery springs from our sinne. It is a truth, (as hath been touched upon the second Chapter) that, God, in many afflictions laid upon his dear children and servants, respects not their sin as the cause procuring and drawing on these afflictions. And very many are afflicted by the world, not for sinnes sake, but for righteousness sake. As Christ, so some Christians may say in their spheare, We have done many good works, for which of them doe ye stone us? Yet this is as cleare a truth, that, the sinne of any man is in it selfe a sufficient meritorious cause of any, yea, of all afflicti­ons. A creature cannot beare a greater punishment, then the least [Page 220] of his sinnes deserves. Man weaves a spiders webb of sinne out of his owne bowels, and then he is intangled in the same webb; the troubles which insnare, and wrappe about him, are twisted with his own fingers. Thirdly, observe,

Naturally every man seekes the reason of his sorrows and afflicti­ons out of himselfe.

When man is afflicted, he is not willing to owne himself, as the cause of his afflictions, or acknowledge that they spring from his sinne; and, that may be the reason, why Eliphaz speaks thus to Job, as if he had said, thy thoughts are wandring abroad, thou little thinkst that thy afflictions were bred in thy owne bosome: Thou art fastning the cause of then upon this, and t'other thing; Thou art complaining of the day wherein thou wast borne▪ but thou shoul­dest rather complain of the sin wherein thou wast born; Th [...] birth­day hath not hurt thee, but thy birth-sin. Thy birth-sin hath gi­ven conception to all the sorrows of thy life.

The Jewes in the Prophet Isa's time were in great distresse, and could get no deliverance. The ports and passages of mercy were all obstructed. Now, whether went their thoughts? And what did they looke upon, as the reason of those abiding lingring evils? we may reade their thoughts in the refutation of them; we may see what the disease of their hearts was, by the medicine which the Prophet applies unto them: he labours to purge them from that conceit, as if either want of power, or want of love in the Lord were the stop of their deliverance. The Lords hand is not shortned that he cannot save, neither his eare heavy, that he cannot heare, Isa. 59. 1, 2. as if he had said, I know what your apprehensions are in these affliction, you thinke the reason is in God, that either he cannot, or he will not save you: You think the hand of Gods pow­er is shrunke up, or the eare of his mercy shut up, but, you reflect not upon your selves, nor consider, that Your iniquities have sepa­rated between you and your God; Your sinne does you hurt, and you touch not that with a little finger, but lay the weight of your charge upon God himselfe. So (Hos. 13. 9.) Thy destruction is from thy self, in me is thy help. God is forced to tel them so, that their de­struction was from themselves, they would not believe it: they sup­posed it was from the cruelty or malice of the creature, from the wrath and rage of enemies, from some oversight or neglect of their friends; therefore the Lord speaks out in expresse termes, Thy destruction is from thy self. It springs not forth of the dust, neither is [Page 221] thy destruction from me; In me is thy help; in both the heart of man failes equally, we are ready to say, that the good we have comes from our selves, that our help and comforts are from our own pow­er and wisdom, and so offer sacrifice to our own nets, as if by them our portion were fat: but for evil and destruction we assigne it whol­ly over, somtime to men, and so are angry; sometime to God, and so blaspheme. We naturally decline what reflects shame upon our selves, or speaks us guilty.

From our translation, Although affliction, &c- Observe

First, Every affliction hath a cause.

The Proverbe carries that sense, in every common understanding. Our afflictions have a cause, a certaine cause, they come not by hap hazzard, or by accident. Many things are casuall, but nothing is without a cause. Many things are not fore seene by man, but all things are fore-ordained by God. The Prophet Amos (Ch. 3. 6.) sets forth this by an elegant similitude, Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no ginne is for him? As if he should say, is a bird taken in a snare by chance, where none have prepared, set or indu­striously laid a snare or a ginne to take him? The bird saw not the snare, but the snare was set for the Bird. Snaresfall not on the ground at adventure, they grow not out of the earth of them­selves: but the fowler, by his art and industry, invents and frames them a purpose to catch the bird: Thus, the calamity and troubles in which men are caught and lime-twig'd, insnared and shackled in the world, come not out of the ground, They are not acts of chance, but of providence: The wise and holy God sets such snares, to take and hold foolish, unruly men, like silly birds, ga­ping after the baits of worldy pleasures. Which meaning is cleare from the scope and tendency of the whole Chapter; but the next question resolves it in the letter, Is there any evill in a City, and the Lord hath not done it? Those words are both the conclusion and explication of the former similitude. Secondly, observe

Affliction is not from the power of any creature. As it comes not by chance or without a cause, so not by the power of creatures, they are not the cause; dust and the ground, are opposed to Hea­ven or to a divine power: Creatures (in this sense) can neither doe good, nor doe evill. The world would be as full of trouble, as it is of sin, if sinfull men could make trouble: It is not in the com­passe of a creature, no not of all the creatures in Heaven or earth, to forme or to make out one affliction, without the concur­rence, [Page 222] and allowance of God himselfe. Men alone, can neither make staves of comfort, nor rods of affliction.

Whence thirdly, A consectary from both may be, That Afflictions are from the Lord as from the efficient cause, the directer and orderer of them.

These evils are from a creating, not from a created strength. I (saith the Lord) forme the light and create darknesse, Isa. 45. 7. Naturall darknesse hath only a deficient cause, but poenall darknesse hath an efficient cause. Darknesse is created. As in the first creation God said, let there be light, so in providence (which is a continued creation) he saith, let there be darknesse. If afflictions come not forth of the earth, then they come from Hea­ven. That wicked King preacht very good doctrine, when he said of an extreame devouring famine, This evill is from the Lord, though he failed utterly in the use or application, while he mur­mured out why should we waite on the Lord any longer? 2 King. 6. 33. For, the reason holds strong to the contrary, This evill is from the Lord, we will waite upon the Lord for ever.

Verse 7. Yet, man is borne unto trouble, as the sparks flye up­ward.

Yet man, or but man is borne to trouble: Some reade, Man is borne to sin, that is, he is borne with a nature ready and prone to sin, because he is borne in sin, Psal. 51. 5. And so by consequent he is borne to trouble, which is caused by and is the fruit of sin. These two, sin and trouble, are so neere in blood and kindred, that still one word includes them both; The former word which signifies sin, properly is translated affliction, and this word which signifies affliction, properly may be translated sin. When it is said, That Man is borne to trouble or sin; It notes two things.

1. A right to them, a right to sinne, and a right to sorrow. That which a man is borne to, is duely his, it is his inheritance, or his birth-right; that is the common understanding of the phrase: As some men are borne to a great estate, to lands and honours, &c. so all men are borne to trouble and sin; They are ours by a line all right, derived from our next, yea first parents, so they descend to us as land descends.

2. It implies a readinesse, or a fitnesse to commit sin, or to falls into trouble: When a man is said to be borne to a thing, it note him exceeding apt and forward to take it: He needs little teaching [Page 223] and instructing, little cultivating or manuring. As when a man makes verses readily, we say he was borne to Poetry; or when a man gets wealth easily, we say, he was borne to be rich. So in the present case; A mans understanding, will and affections, need no manaring or dressing to bring forth sinne, or the fruit of it, sor­row. He is borne to sin.

The latter clause of the verse cleares the sense fully, Manis borne unto trouble, or unto sinne, as the sparks fly upward; The meaning is, as the sparks have a principle in themselves, by which they ascend, they need no directing; when a sparke comes out from the fire, no man bids it flye upward, or shewes it the way, it will flye upward alone, it knowes no other way, but upward; so, it is a naturall course for man, as soone as he is borne, to sin and work his own sorrow. This he can doe, the first thing he doth, and before he can doe any thing, well, he can doe this, but, too well; He needs no Tutor for these, sinning and sorrowing, are not his art, but his nature; though he should have neither rule nor example in the world, he would find out the mysteries of iniquity, and doe e­nough quickly to make himselfe miserable.

The particle, As, is a copulative in the Hebrew. So divers render it in this Text, Man is borne to trouble, And the sparks flye up­ward; Vau. that is, mans trouble and sparks flying upward, are alike naturall; we, as in divers other places, translate it by way of simi­litude; Man is borne unto trouble, as, the sparks flye upward; So Job 34. 3. The eare tryeth words, and, the mouth tasteth meate; we translate the copalative by a comparative; The eare tryeth words, as the mouth tasteth meate. Againe, Mark 9. 49. Every one shall be salted with fire, and every sacrifice shall be salted with salt; The sense lies in the similitude, Every one shall be salted with fire, as every sacrifice is salted with salt; It is an allusion to the old sacrifices, wherein salt was continually used; so here, Man [...] Filijpru [...]ae hoc est scintillae. Metapherice ferrūsagi [...]tae in­calescens motu, & q [...]icquid volat in aere sive scintil [...]ae, sive sag [...]ae, sive aves is borne unto trouble, and the sparks, that is, as the sparks flye up­ward.

As the sparks] The Hebrew is, The sonnes of the cole; the sons or children of the cole, are sparks; blow a cole, and presently a sparke is begotten and borne; therefore the Hebrew elegancie calls sparks, The sonnes or children of the cole. And it is observe­able, that by a metaphor this word signifies in the Hebrew, the Head of an Arrow heated with motion, as also, a bird flying in the ayre; and the reason is, because birds flye up in the ayre, they as­cend [Page 224] naturally, they flye about and flutter like sparks of fire in the ayre. Hence the vulger and some others translate the words, Man is borne unto trouble, as the birds flye upward; The Septua­gint, as the young Vultures flye upward, others, as the young [...]. Sepr. [...], Com­put. Non secus ad aerumn [...]s & miserias hic perserendas na­ [...]us est homo, quam innatum est & natura­le scintilis & volatilibus om nibus ut in sublime arto­lantur. Merc. ones of the Eagle flye upward: Aben Ezra a learned Rabbin, makes use of that sense also, and gives the glosse thus, as it is na­turall and innate for birds to flye, so it is naturall for man to suffer trouble. Hence observe, first,

Sorrow and sinne, are the portion, and all the portion, that man hath by nature. He is borne to these.

They who are ascended to the greatest heights, and have got the greatest stock, either of spirituall or outward comforts, were borne to nothing, but a cup of sorrow, to the bread of affliction, and to the waters of adversity: And these we are instated in, yea posses­sed of, as soone as we are borne; we need not waite the death of our parents for this inheritance, they devide it all to every child, and yet keep it all, to themselves: all our real comforts are from our second birth, and have their pedigree from the blessing and love of God. Therefore he Apostle puts that generall question, what hast thou, that thou hast not received? that is, what good hast thou? Thou hast all thy evill from thy selfe, but whatsoever good thou hast, was received from above; all our good is founded in free Grace. Secondly observe, That

All sinnes and sorrowes are contained virtually, in the nature of man.

Though a man doth not formally commit or bring forth every sin, though a man doth not formally beare every affliction, or tast every cup of sorrow, yet virtually and radically a man hath every sin in him, or it is possible for any sin to be formed and shaped out of the nature of man: Radically also every man hath every affli­ction all sorrowes in him; and the justice of God, may forme the most dreadfull shapt afflictions out of his sins: And as the sparke lyes closely in the fire, or the flint, till you smite or blow them up, so sin lyes secretly in our hearts, till some temptation or occasion smites and brings it out.

Againe we may observe, That

Man can sin without a teacher. You need not instruct him, or teach him to doe evill, He doth that by a naturall instinct, since his nature was corrupted. He sins as the sparks fly upwards, or as a bird flyes in the ayre, whom no man directs, how to use her wings, [Page 225] Nature. is her rute. There needs much teaching against sin, and it is the businesse of all the Ordinances to bridle us from acting our corruptions: But man walkes in the ways of wickedness, without guide or precept.

It was the ancient error of the Pelagians, that the sin of man came only by imitation: they denied that man had a stock of cor­ruption in his nature, or that his nature was corrupted; but, seeing others sin, he sinned; an opinion which carries its condemnation in its own face, as wel as in our hearts. And though similitudes are no proofs, yet, the reason of a similitude is: mans sinning is there­fore compared to a sparks flying, to shew how naturally he sins. A spark flyes upward without any to lead it the way; and a bird would flye, though she should never see another bird flye: And if a man could live so, as never to see any one example of sin all his dayes, yet that man, out of his own heart, might bring forth every sin, every day. Example quickens and encourages the principles of sin within us, but we can sin without any extrinsick motion or provocation, without pattern or president from without. Lastly observe,

To sin, is no burden or labour to a natural man: For it is his na­ture. It is no paines to the sparke, to flye upwards: what we doe naturally, we doe easily. Holy duties are no burdens to a godly man, because, through grace, he doth them naturally; he hath an inward principle, which dictates the law of holines to him, though he should want outward teaching: He hath an unction from the holy Ghost, and knoweth all things, 1 Joh. 2. 20. Not that a godly man becomes like God, Omniscient, or knowing all, for at most we know, here, but in part: but he knows all things necessary, and so farre as necessary: his new birth teaches him: He lives not meerely upon the outward teaching, he hath both light & liberty in himself; and so hath a tendency to these things in his own spi­rit, as there is a tendency in fire to ascend.

We should wonder and rejoyce, to see how grace conquers the course of sinful nature. The new man is born to mercy and holi­nesse to grace and glory, as the sparks fly upward. Hence it is said, He that is born of God, cannot commit sin, for the seed of God remaineth in him. As, the sparke cannot flye downward, because the heate of fire remaines in it: The Apostle affirmes it, of himselfe and his Fellow-labourers in the Gospell, we can doe nothing against the truth, but for the truth, 2 Cor: 13. 8. The possibilities and impossi­bilities [Page 226] of a regenerate man, are directly opposite to those of a na­turall man: The one cannot sin, the other cannot but sin: the one can doe nothing against the truth the other can doe nothing for the truth; gracious acts become as naturall, as sinfull, when nature is changed from sin to grace. What a blessed change is this, that man should doe good as readily, as once he did evill; that, he who was borne free to iniquity, should be re-borne free to righteousness, as the sparke; flye upward. A godly man is a heavenly sparke: He hath a fire in his nature, which carries him upward for ever.

Thus having opened these two verses, being the grounds of the following exhortation; let us now examine the matter of the ex­hortation it selfe, contained in the 8th. verse.

Verse 8. I would seeke unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause.

Our Translation omits one word in the beginning of this sen­tence, which though it may be understood in our reading, yet the [...] expression of it betters the sense. Surely, or truly I would seeke, &c.

There are two opinions about the meaning of these words; Some conceive, that Eliphaz speaks in high contempt of Job: and I may give you their sense, by that proud schooling, which the Pha­risee gave the poor Publican, Luke 18. As that Pharisee insulted over the publican, thus, I thank God, I am not such a one as thou art, &c. but I fast, and I pray, &c. So, they represent Eliphaz here insulting over Job, I thank God, I am not such an impatient person as thou art, no such rude curser of my day, or complainer of my trouble; I am not (I thank God) so distracted, and so distem­pered as thou art; and if I had been in thy case, I should have shew­ed more wit, and grace too, then, to do, as thou hast done; I should never have been so vaine and foolish, so forgetfull of my own duty or the Lords Soveraignty, as, to cry out against and accuse his pro­vidence and dealings with me, to lay about me like a mad man, as thou hast done; no, I would have songht unto God, and committed my cause unto him, this should have been my course, such and such the frame and temper of my spirit.

But I rather take these words in a good sense, implying much sweetnesse and meeknesse of spirit in Eliphaz. And so this verse is as an application of the Doctrine, contained in the former two; As if Eliphaz had said, Seeing matters stand thus in themselves and these are undoubted truths, that afflictions come from our [Page 227] selves, and that our sinnes are our own: and seeing thy case stands thus, that now thou art under great afflictions and troubles; I doe assure thee my loving friend Job, were I in thy condition (I will give thee faithfull counsell, and tell thee my heart, what I would doe) I would no longer stay complaining against my day, cursing creatures, distempering my head, and disquieting my heart with these passions; but, I would even goe and addresse my selfe unto God, I would apply my selfe to Heaven, I would seeke for remedy there, earth affords it not. I have ever found this the way to ease my heart when burdened; to asswage my sorrowes, when encrea­sed; to compose my spirit, when distracted; to strengthen my re­solutions, when unsetled: I can give thee this rule with (A Probatum est) an assurance from mine own experience, in the use of it, and with clearnesse of conscience, that it is my purpose in such cases to use it ever.

I would seeke unto God.] The word signifies a very diligent [...] Significat quae­rere diligenter & cu [...] cur [...] sed interrega­tione & ve [...]bi [...] ut plurimum. search; I would seeke exactly and enquire laboriously unto God. It signifies to seek by asking questions or by interrogating: And it imports seeking with much wisedome and skill; a curious or a criticall enquirie; So Eccles. 1. 13. I gave my heart (saith Solo­mon) to seeke and search out by wisedome. And this seeking im­plies foure things.

First, A supposition and a sense of our wants; no man seekes that which he hath already, or, but thinks he hath it. He that is full loathes a hony-combe.

Secondly, A strong desire to find that, which we want; it notes not a bare desire only, or woulding, but a kind of unquietnesse or restlessenesse till we find: such a desire tooke hold of David. Psal. 132. 4. I will not give rest to mine eyes, nor slumber to mine eye­lids, untill I find out a place for the Lord, or, untill I find the Lord.

Thirdly, A care to be directed about the meanes which may fa­cilitate the finding or recovery of what we want, and thus ear­nestly desire. A seeking spirit, is a carefull spirit, after light and counsell.

Fourthly, A diligent and faithfull endeavour, in or about the use those meanes, to which counsell directs us. Through desire a man having separated himselfe, seeketh and intermedleth with all wis­dome, Prov. 18. 1. That is, he is very industrious in pursuing those advices, which wisdome shews him, or, which are shewed him, as the wayes of wisdome. A lazy spirit is unfit to seeke.

I would seek unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause. In the former clause, the word for, God, is El, and in the latrer, Elo­him, both names note the power of God. El, notes power or strength to act and execute; Elohim, power or authority to judge and determine. I would seek unto El, The strong God. I would com­mit my cause to Elohim, the Mighty God: As if he had said: Thou art in a weake and low condition, now therefore seeke unto God, the strong God, the mighty God, who is able to deliver thee. Thou wantest the help of such a friend as he.

The Hebrew, word for word is thus rendred, Ʋnto God would I put my words, or turne my speech. We reach the meaning fully, rendring. Ʋnto God I would commit my cause, or put my case.

The terme which we translate, cause, signifies any businesse or [...] Significat ver­ [...]um vel nego­tium, res meas ei committe [...]ē. cause, but most properly a word; Explicite prayer is the turning of our thoughts into words, or the putting of our case to God, It is a speaking to, or a pleading with the Lord. The Septuagint is clear in this sense, I would deprecate the Lord, I would call upon the Lord, the governor of all things.

Both these significations of the word, are profitable for us, and congruous with the scope of the text, I would turne my speech and [...]. Sept. prayer, or I would commit my cause unto God.

The committing of our cause to God, notes a resignation of our selves and of our condition into the hands of God: It is as much as to say, Let God doe what he will, or determine what he pleaseth concerning me, I will not strive or contend about, question or dis­pute his decision or judgement of my cause: I will lay my selfe down at his feet, and tell him how she case stands with me; then, let him doe with me, what seems good in his eyes: This is the com­mitting of our cause, and condition unto God. And the Originall word here used for God, doth very well suite and correspond with this sense; I will commit my cause unto God, unto Elohim, the great and impartiall Judge of Heaven and earth; the God who loves Judgement, and the habitation of whose Throne is righ­teousnes: The God who knowes how to discern exactly be­tween cause and cause, person and person, and will undoubtedly give a righteous sentence concerning every cause and person, that comes before him. Unto this Elohim would I commit my cause, and refer my self to his arbitration.

Observe first in the general; Eliphaz having reproved Job, turnes himself to counsell and exhortation; From which we may learne, That

As it is our duty to reprove a fault in our brother, so it is our duty to advise and counsell him how to amend, or come out of that fault, for which we reprove him.

It is not enough to espy an error, but we must labour to rectifie it; or, to tell another that he is out of the way, but we must endea­vour to reduce him. Many can espy faults and failings in others, who either know not how, or care not to reforme and helpe them out. Secondly observe, That.

It is a duty to exhort and excite our bretheren to those duties, wherein we find them flack or negligent.

Eliphaz conceived, that Job was much behind in the duty of prayer and self-resignation unto God, and therefore he quickens him up to it. The Apostle calls us to this Christian inspection (Heb. 3. 13.) Exhort one another daily, lest any of you be hard­ned through the deceitfulnesse of sinne; sin growing and getting strength, hardens the heart; it is best to oppose it betimes, and therefore he bids them doe it at all times, exhort one another daily. Though the Apostle Peter (2 Pet. 1. 12.) was per­swaded of the Saints establishment in the present truth, yet (saith he) I will not cease to put you alwayes in remembrance of these things. It is a dangerous error (which some hold) that the Saints in this life may out grow counsell and exhortation; as if there were no need, to bid a godly man pray & seek unto God, no need to bid a godly man repent, or humble himself, or believe, he cannot but do these things (say they) these are connaturall to him. They are indeed to the new man, within him: But let them withall remember, that the neglect of all these duties, is as connaturall to the old man within him. While there are two men within us, we had need every man to look, not only to one, but to one another. It may goe ill with the better part, the new man, if while he hath an enemy within to oppose him, he hath not a friend without to help him. On this ground (besides the command of Christ) the holiest man on earth, may be exhorted, to look to his holinesse: none are in more danger then they, who think they are past danger And, as it is a certaine argument, that a man was never good, if he desires not to be better; so, it is a great argument, that a man was never good, who feares not that he may be worse, They who are truly assured they cannot fall from grace, are assured also that they may fall in grace, and fall into sin: The foundation of God stands sure, but the footing of man doth not and therefore, Let him [Page 230] that stands, take heed least he fall: And let them who see their bre­thren, heedlesly falling, lend them the right hand of exhortation to raise them up againe: and when they are carelesse of, or wan­dring from the Lord leade them by the hand of counsell, into ways where he may be found. I would seeke unto God. Observe in the third place; That

We ought to manage our exhortations with meeknesse and ten­dernesse,

This of Eliphaz is a mild and tender expression; and to make it more easie he puts the exhortation (as was noted before) in the first, not in the second person; he doth not say, seeing afflictions come not from the ground, and that man is borne unto trouble, therefore doe thou seeke unto God, and doe thou commit thy cause unto God; but seeing thy case is thus, truly brother, I advise thee as I would advise mine own soul, Seek unto God. It moves strong­ly and gaines upon the affection of another, to tell him, we would do the things our selves, which we desire he should, and we wish him, as we doe our own souls. Fourthly, observe, That

It is both our wisedome and our duty in all our afflictions to seek unto God.

I would (saith Eliphaz) if I were in thy case, seek unto God. Unto whom should we goe, but unto God? He is our best friend, when it is best with us, and he is our only friend, when it is ill with us: all other friends will be Physitians of no value, as Job him­selfe found them, therefore seeke unto God. As the Disciples said unto Christ, when Christ asked them, Will yee also goe away? Whether shall we goe (say they) for thou hast the words of eternall life? So faith the soule in afflictions, To whom shall I goe? Unto this creature or that creature, unto this friend or that friend? No, I will seek unto God, That is the wisest and shortest course: all o­ther courses are about, if not in vain. Other wayes may be used as helps, but this must; pitch mainly upon God.

When we are directed to seek unto God in afflictions, it speakes foure things.

First, To seek unto God about the cause of our afflictions, desire that God would informe us, what his mind is in sending such an af­fliction, or what it is he aimes at, in sending it. Afflictions are the Lords messengers, and we should never be quiet, till we know their errand. This is it which Job complained of in the third Chapter, That his way was hid, which was expounded, that he knew not [Page 231] the cause of his afflictions, the cause was hidden; and so was the issue, he could neither tell how he came in nor how he could come out; If our way in afflictions be hid, we must seeke unto God for the opening of it.

Secondly, To seek unto God for strength and patience, to beare the affliction. As the affliction comes from God, so doth the strength, by which we stand under it, or get victory over it

Thirdly, To seek unto God for the sanctifying of affliction to our profit, that we may be partakers of his holinesse. Afflictions are the good creatures of God, and they (as all other creatures) are sanctif [...]ed to us, by the word and prayer. We have as much rea­son to seek unto God for a blessing upon our daily Rod, as upon our daily bread.

Fourthly, Seek unto God for cure and ease, for the removing or mitigating of them. In their affliction they will seeke me early, saith the Lord, Hos. 5. 15. But, for what will they seek? even, for medicine and healing. Come and let us returne unto the Lord: for he hath torne, and he will heale us, he hath smitten and he will bind us up, Hos. 6. 1.

Observe from the other branch, And unto God would I commit my cause; That

It is a very great ease unto the soule in affliction, to commit our cause unto God, and to put our affairs into his hand.

Man is not able to stand alone, under the weight of his afflictions. Both sinne and sorrow are burdens too heavie for us to beare: if you would have ease, lay both upon Christ, it is no unbecomming boldnesse to doe so, for, he cals us to it, and bids us doe it, Psal. 55. 22. Cast thy burden upon the Lord, and he shall sustaine thee. Christ is willing to beare a part and put his shoulder under these burdens, yea, it is his strength that beares the whole. The committing of our cause to God, is at once our duty, our safety, and our ease. Thus David did, Psal. 142, 2. I powred my complaint before him, I shew­ed before him my trouble. David brought out his evils and set them (as it were) one, by one, in the sight of God, and told him, thus it is with me. We may see David acting this rule, to the life, when Absolom had fomented a most unnaturall rebellion against His: He hastens out of Jerusalem, All the Country wept with a loud voyce, and the Priests with the Arke of the Covenant of God came with him also. In what posture was Davids spirit, in the midst of these commotions? His words to Zadok shew (no doubt) [Page 232] the true picture of it. And the King said to Zadok, carry back the Arke of God into the City, if I shall find favour in the eyes of the Lord, he will bring me againe, and shew me both it and his habi­tation: but if he say thus, I have no delight in thee, behold, here am I, let him doe to me as seemeth good unto him (2 Sam. 15. 25, 26.) As if he had said, I am uncertaine what God will doe with me: but I am resolved to let the Lord doe with mee, what he will, I am willing to be, what God will have me; I lay my cause and leave my businesse at his foot-stool, if he will have me dethroned and unking'd, I am content my honour should lye in the dust. If he say, I shall never come againe to Jerusalem, or see the Arke of his strength and presence, I am content for ever to be banisht Jeru­salem, never to see the Arke, (which to me is the most beautifull and desirable sight in the world) any more. Here was self-resig­nation, and cause-committing to the height. And when David had brought his heart to this, his heart was unburden'd, he (doubt­lesse) found the weight and stresse of the whole businesse lying up­on God himselfe, His cause was with God, and his cares were with God; And therefore, Though his throne shaked, yet his heart was fixed. Nor doe I find, that ever his heart was more fixed, then in this stresse, while his Throne and Crowne were tottering. Hezekiah did the like with like success. In the day of that great and publike calamity, he went and spread the letter of Rabshakeh be­fore God, he, as it were desired God to reade it, to observe the blasphemous contents, and see in what condition he was. He that commits his cause to God, breathes a composed spirit, when the greatest stormes and distractions are upon his bodie or estates, upon Church or State.

Only, take this caution, be sure the cause you commit to God, be a good cause. The committing of a sinfull cause to God, is a dis­honour to, and a high strain of presumption against God. We may commit a doubtfull cause to God, desiring, that he would try, and examine, whether it be good or bad. But we must not commit a doubtfull cause to God desiring him to protect it, or us in it whether it be good or bad. And if (in this sence) we may not commit a doubtfull cause to God; What shall we thinke of those, who shall dare to commit an openly unjust. and wicked cause to God? A wicked mans prayer is alwayes sinfull, but, how abomi­nable is it, when he prayes to be prospered or directed in acting his sin, or to be strengthned in suffering (impenitently) for his sin. There [Page 233] is no gracious act, but a wicked man, at one time or other, will i­mitate. He will pray, and repent, and forgive, and commit his cause to God, and when he dyes, commit his soule to God. There is no trusting to a mouth full of good words, while the heart will not empty it selfe of wickednesse. It is good alwayes to com­mit our cause and our soules to God, but a cause or a soule are not therefore good, because committed unto God. The language of Israel is often spoken by the men of Ashdod; And many who ne­ver had the least part of holinesse in them, can yet set themselves (when there is no remedie) to act a part in it. The Apostle Peter gives us this rule, (1 Epist. 4. 19.) Let them that suffer according to the will of God, commit the keeping of their soules to him, in well-doing, as unto a faithfull Creatour. Except we suffer accor­ding to the will (or from the hand) of God, and also, doe well in our sufferings, Christ will not admit this Feofement, though we commit our selves to him, he will not accept the trust. But he that suffers according to (or by) the will of God, and doth well in suf­fering, that is, hath a good cause, and a good conscience, He (I say) may commit all to God, (and in the mercy of the most High) he shall not miscarry.

Lastly, Whereas Eliphaz saith, I would seeke unto God were I in thy case, observe, That

It is a wise course in advising others, to shew our selves readie to follow the same advise.

It wins exceedingly upon others, to take our counsell, when it appeares we are ready to follow the same counsell, our selves. We ought to doe nothing unto others, but what we would have done unto our selves, and we should advise nothing to others, but what we our selves would doe; It puts strength into a rule, when he that gives it, is ready to enliven it by his owne practice. As a Physi­tian, for the encouragement of his patient to take a nauseous me­dicine, will say to him, Sir you seeme unwilling to drinke it, but if I were sicke and distempered, as you are, I would drinke it readily, and that you may see there is no hurt in it, I will tast a lit­tle my selfe; His tasting sweetens it, and the patient likes it well. Thus when either Minister or private friend offers advise or counsell, and shall say, thus I would doe, this I would follow; This takes upon the heart: whereas it disparages prayer or any du­ty, to say to another, Seeke unto God, put your case unto him, fast and pray; When he that gives the counsell neglects all these [Page 234] duties, and is carelesse of communion with God.

Christ saith of the Pharisees, that they bound heavy burthens up­on the shoulders of others. These burdens were counsels and dire­ctions, rules, and canons; they would have men doe thus and thus, in the manner of Gods worship, or daily converse with men. But, They themselves would not touch them with one of their fingers (Mat. 23. 4.) That is, they would not practise them in the least degree. As to do evil with both hands, (Mic. 7. 3.) notes the highest degree both of desire & endeavour, in doing evill: So not to touch that which is good with a finger, notes a total neglect of doing good. A finger is the least member, and a Touch is the least act, then these Pharisees not touching with a finger, imports they did not act at all. It is good to act a rule privately by way of expe­riment, before we put it upon others: but it is most necessary to act it by way of example, when we have published it to, and press'd it upon others. It was a speech of one of the Ancients, I never taught my people any thing, but what I had first practised and experimented my selfe. Doctrine is sooner followed by the eye, then by the eare; He that (like the Scribes and pharisees, Mat. 23. 3.) saith and doth not, shall find but few to doe what he saith. No man ought to teach any thing, which he is not willing (as he is call'd) to doe and observe himselfe. It is very sinfull to give counsell, which we will not take. Our works ought to be the practise of our words, and as practicable as our words. Woe unto those of whom it may be said, as Christ of the Pharisees, Mat. 23. 3. Whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and doe, but doe not ye after their works.

JOB. Chap. 5. Vers. 9.Which doth great things and unsearchable; marvellous things without number, &c.’

THis context unto the 17 verse, containes the second argument, by which Eliphaz strengthneth his former Exhortation, To seeke unto God and to commit his cause unto him. The argument may be thus formed.

He is to be sought unto, both in duty, and in wisdome, and unto him our cause is to be committed, who is of absolute, infinite power, wisdome and goodnesse.

But God is of absolute, infinite power, wisdome and good­nesse.

Therefore it is our duty and our wisdome to seeke unto God, and unto God to commit our cause.

That, God is infinite in power, wisdome and goodnesse, Eli­phaz proves by an enumeration or induction of divers effects and works, which call for infinite power, wisdome and goodnesse to produce and actuate them.

These effects are laid down, first in generall, v. 9. Who doth great things and unsearchable; marvellous things without number.

Then, these works or effects are given in particulars, and the first particular instance of Gods mighty power, is in naturall things, or his preservation of the world, at the 10 verse, Who giveth raine upon the earth, and sendeth waters upon the fields.

The second instance is given in civill things, or his administrati­ons in the world, at the 12, 13, 14. verses. And that we may consider two wayes.

1. In destroying the counsels and plots of the wicked, in the 12, 13, and 14. verses, He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot performe their enterprise, &c.

2. In delivering those who are in trouble, at the 15. verse, He saveth the poore from the Sword, &c. These are works of Power.

Further the goodnesse of God shines forth in two things.

1. By the present intendment, or end aimed at, in these mighty works, ver. 11. To set up on high those that be low, that those which mourne may be exalted to safety

2. By the future benefit of these works, and that in two respects, verse 16.

1. The raising up of their spirits who are oppressed, So the poore hath hope.

2. The confounding and shaming of their oppressours, exprest in their silence, at the latter end of the 16 verse, And iniquity stoppeth her mouth.

Thus you have a briefe account, of the severall points contained in this argument, and the disposition of the whole context. For the better understanding thereof, we will first consider what might be the aime or scope of Eliphaz, in making so accurate and large a description of God, in his great and marvellous works, and then survay these works in order as they are digested.

To the former, we may take notice of a foure-fold aime, which Eliphaz might have in describing these works of God.

First, plainly to assert the providence of God, in ordering or dis­posing all actions and events here below: and so it is in prosecution of what he had said in the 6 verse, Affliction commeth not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground.

Or secondly, his intent might be, to humble Job, to bridle and take downe his spirit, which he conceived over-bold with, and too much heightned towards the Almighty; A discovery whereof himself made in his extravagant speeches before noted, in the third Chapter. The remembrance of God in his greatnesse is one of the readiest means to humble man: And God himselfe tooke this way to humble Job, in the latter end of this booke, even, by a large dis­course of his owne power, exemplified in many great acts and pee­ces of the creation.

Or thirdly, the intent of Eliphaz might be, to support and com­fort Job in his afflictions, by shewing him a God, that had done such wonders, and therefore able to worke another wonder in de­livering and raising him up againe: A God, who could provide medicines for all his diseases, heale all his breaches, repaire all his losses, supply all his wants, and resolve all his doubts. To con­sider God in himselfe and in his works, who he is, and what he doth, is a mighty encouragement to seeke unto God in our greatest extremities, in the saddest and cloudiest day of our afflictions. Nei­ther can we doe any thing more prevalent, for the support and reliefe of our owne spirits in a time, when we are lowest, than to spread before the eye of our owne thoughts, the power, greatness, and goodnesse of the high God, in his works and wonders.

A fourth intent in probability was to stop Jobs curiosity, in en­quiring so much into the reason of Gods dealing with him; which Eliphaz it seemes observed in the complaints of the third Chap­ter, where Job expostulates, Why is light given to a man whose way is hid, and whom God hath hedged in? Job was troubled, be­cause he could not see the bottome of Gods dealings with him, he could not see through them, either what the cause was, why he came into those troubles, or by what issues, and out-lets, he should escape those troubles. Now, to stop Jobs curiosity in pry­ing too far, or too boldy, into the secret workings of God. Eli­phaz tels him, That God doth great things and unsearchable, no marvell therefore, if his wayes were hid; That he doth marvellous [Page 237] things without number, no marvaile then, if he could not measure his dealings, by the line of humane understanding, or summe up their account, by the best of his Arithmetick.

This in generall, for the common tendency of his discourse, about those noble acts of divine Providence in earthly things. I come now to open the words in particular.

Which doth great things and unsearchable, marvellous things without number.

Which doth. He speakes in the present tense, he sayes not, which hath done great things, or, which will doe great things; but which doth great things. And that notes not only a present act, but a continued act, or an everlasting act; or, as if the workings of God were but one act past, and to come, all included in the present, He doth. As in his Nature and Essence, though God was from all eternity, and shall be unto all eternity, yet his Name is, I am. So in his works, though he hath done great things, and shall doe great things for ever, yet all are comprehended in this, I doe, or He doth great things. Christ (Joh. 5. 17.) speakes this language, My Fa­ther worketh hitherto; worketh; All that which God had done, and all that he should doe, is to be looked upon as his present act, My Father worketh hitherto..

Againe, there is some what to be considered in the naturall em­phasis [...] of the word it selfe, as well, as in the circumstantiall of the time. The word which we translate, Doth, signifies more than an Aptè concinne, & exq [...]isi [...]è facit. E [...]a [...] vocatus, quia cum nas­ceretur. suit f [...] ­ctus. & perfe­ctus pilis. Esau sonat per­fectum & or­natum, nam perfectior pue­ris, ie instru­ctus pilis in lu­cem venerit. Jun. in loc. ordinary Doing; which doth great things. The Criticks observe, that in strictnesse and propriety of the Hebrew, it signifies to doe a thing compleatly, perfectly and exactly, or (as we say) the set­ting of our last hand to a worke. Hence Esau (Gen. 25. 25.) had his name. When Jacob and Esau were borne, Esau came forth first, and the text saith, they called his name Esau, and why? be­cause he was borne, made up, in greater perfection, than an ordina­ry child. Esau signifies, adorned and perfected, because he came into the world hairy, or with haire upon him, which is both a na­turall ornament, and an argument of naturall strength activity and heate of spirit, &c. Hence they call'd him, Esau: So then, the word [doth] imports doing, not by way of essay or inchoa­tion, but doing compleatly, or to carry a thing on, or up to an ex­traordinary degree of perfection. I shall give one Scripture to il­lustrate that significancy of the word, Isa. 43. 7. where the Lord [Page 238] by the Prophet, shewing the abundant increase of the Church, speaks thus, Bring my sons from far, and my daughters from the ends of the earth; even every one that is called by my name, for I have crea­ted him for my glory, I have formed him, yea I have made him. Observe, here is a plaine gradation in those three words, Created, [...] Produxit ad esse [...] Constituit rem in forma su [...] [...] Perfecit, dis­posuit. formed, made; I have created him, signifies the bringing of a thing from a not-being, to a being. But, saith God, I have not only given him a being, but, I have formed him; which notes the lim­ming proportioning and polishing of a thing: And not only have I done so, but, in the third place, (which is the word of the text) I have made him. There is more in this word, than in the former two, and therefore we translate it with an emphasis, yea, I have made him; that is, I have not only given him a being and a shape, but I have put upon him all the perfections of nature, yea, and the perfections of grace, the impressions of my speciall love and favour; I have lifted him up to the top of all; and so some ren­der the word, I have magnified or made him great; I have exalted and set him upon the highest pinnacles of perfections, and moun­taines of holinesse, Hence observe,

When God begins a worke, he compleats and carries it through. He doth not only Create, and give a being: Forme, and give pro­portion, but He doth, or he makes, giving beauty and exactnesse to his works. Whether we consider the works of God as naturall, civill or spirituall; in this sense God doth them. Deut. 32. 4. Moses speakes in generall, concerning all the works of God; He is a rock, and his worke is perfect: The works of Creation are ad­mirable to the eye; the works of Providence, how often doe they fill the heart with admiration: That which he spake to Samuel concerning the house of Ely, is appliable both to his works of Mercy and of judgement; When I begin, I will also make an end, 1 Sam. 3. 12. that is, I will doe it fully, there is nothing shall take me off, or stay me in the mid-way; I will not worke to halves, I will also make an end. And so it is in spirituals, when once God hath begun, he carries on his work of grace, when once he hath laid the foundation stone of mercy, he never leaves, untill he hath set up the the top stone, the highest stone of glory. Hence the Apostles (Heb. 12.) entitles Christ, The author and finisher of our faith; that is, the beginner and ender, Alpha and Omega, first and last about our faith. It shall never be said of any work of God (as Luk. 14.) That, he began to build, but could not finish it.

And as he finishes, so he beautifies: all his works are full of or­der and comelinesse: He doth his work exquisitely (or as we say) artificially; yea, those works that we look upon, as full of confu­sion, are full of order; and those works, in which we see no form, or nothing but deformity, even these will one day appear (now they are) admirable in beauty and comelinesse. That which the Apostle speaks in his exhortation to Timothy, 2 Tim. 2. 15. bid­ding him doe the work of an Evangelist, bidding him shew him­selfe a workman, that needeth not to be ashamed, is most true concerning the great God of Heaven and earth, He shewes him­selfe a workman, or a worker that needeth not to be ashamed: When he works, he doth the work of a God; He works like himselfe: Man cannot so much as be suspected to have done such things: The Name, that is, the wisdome, power and goodness of God, is writ­ten upon them in so faire and clear a letter, that it must be said, by way of assertion, This hath God wrought: And by way of admi­ration, what hath God wrought? Numb. 23. 23. A man (sc. a meer naturall man beholding these things) shall say, verily he is a God that judgeth the earth, Psal. 58. 11. Man cannot judge, or doe like this. The Lord needs not engrave or subscribe his Name to his works; His words, like so many Capitall letters, spell, and like so many Heraulds, proclaime his Name.

Which doth great things.

To passe from the act or manner of doing, we will consider the object; He doth great things. Some men with a great deal of paines doe nothing; and others with a great deal of art, doe a thing of nothing, a trifle, a toy, a meere fancy; at least some mean or inferiour work takes up their time, skill, and study: But when God goes to work, we may expect a noble work, He doth great things. The works of GOD, answer the stile or Attributes of God. He is a great God, and His are great works. The works of God speak a God. And here are foure things spoken in this one verse, of the works of God, which speak aloud, This is the finger of God: I will first bundle them together, and then, both take and weigh them asunder.

  • He doth
    • First, Great things.
    • Secondly, Ʋnsearchable.
    • Thirdly, Wonderfull.
    • Fourthly, Innumerable, or without number.

No works of man or Angel, are capable of such a foure-fold stampe as this: no, nor any one work of all the creatures put toge­ther, could ever be stamped with any one of these characters, in any comparison, with the works of God. Some, in a sense, have done great things but none have done things unsearchable: Man may fathome the works of man, his closest wayes are not past finding out. As there was never any thing made so strong by the strength of man, but there was some other strength in man, that could match, yea overthrow it; so there was never any thing so wisely, so artificially or mysteriously contrived, by the skill, know­ledge and deepest understanding of a man, but that the skill know­ledge and understanding of another man, hath, or might have rid­led and searcht it out. The works of most men, are wrought above ground, and their intentions flote and swimme upon the face of their actions: And although some, as the Prophet speakes (Isa. 29.) worke deepe to hide their counsels (as they hope, not only from men but) from God, yet God gives other men a light, to discover the very lowest hell of those counsels, even, all the depths of Satan, The master-Engineere of those mines and subterranean contrivances. Further, Though some men doe that, which makes other men (especialy fooles, or men weake in knowledge) won­der, yet no (Thaumaturgas, or) wonder-worker ever did that, which makes all men wonder. Or, if it should be granted, that any have done things great, unsearchable, wonderfull, yet I am sure, none have done these things without number; one great, unsear­chable, wonderfull work, is taske enough for one mans life: And a little skill in numbers will serve the turne, to cast up, and give us the totall summe and number, of all the works of all men, which deservedly beare (as mans may) the title and superscription of great, unsearchable, wonderfull.

More distinctly. First, He doth great things. There is a great­nes upon every thing God doth: The great God leaves (as it were) the print of his own greatnesse, even upon those things which we accont little; little works of nature, have a greatnesse in them, considered as done by God, and little works of providence, have a greatnesse in them, considered as done by God; If the thing which God doth, be not great in it selfe, yet it is great, because he doth it. As there is no sin of man little in it selfe (though comparatively it be (because committed against a great God: So there is no work of God little (though comparitively it be (because acted by the [Page 241] great God. Further, if God doth a thing, which in it selfe consi­dered, or considered according to the line and rule of the creature, is unjust; yet because God doth it, or commands it to be done, his very doing or commanding stamps justice upon it; as is clear in the case of Abrahams call to sacrifice his son, and the Israelites carrying away the jewels of the Aegyptians. If then the act of God (whose will is the supream law) makes that lawfull, which ac­cording to the common rule, is unlawfull; how much more doth the act of God make that great, which in ordinary proportion is accounted small.

Againe, When it is said, God doth great things, we must not understand it, as, if God dealt not about little things, or as if he let the small matters of the world passe, and did not meddle with them: Great in this place, is not exclusive of Little, for, he doth not onely great, but small, even the smallest things. The Heathens said, their Jupiter had no leisure to be present at the doing of small Non vacat ex­ignis rebus ad­esse Jovi. things, or it did not become him to attend them. God attendeth the doing of small things, and it is his honour to doe so: the fal­ling of a Sparrow to the ground, is one of the smallest things that is, yet that is not without the providence of God; the haires of our head are small things, yet as not too many, so not too small for the great God to take notice of; Christ assures us this, The very haires of your head are all numbred, Mat. 10. 29, 30. We ought highly to adore and reverence the power and inspection of God, about the lowest, the meanest things and actions. Is it not with the great God, as with great men, or, as it was with that great man Moses, who had such a burthen of businesse in the government of that people upon his shoulders, that he could not bear it; there­fore his Father in law adviseth him, to call in the aide of others and divide the work: But how? The great matters, the weighty and knotty controversies must be brought to Moses; but the petty differences and lesser causes, are transmitted and handed over to in­feriour judges; And it shall be, that every great matter, they shall bring unto thee, but every small matter they shall judge, Exod. 18. 22. But God, the great Judge of Heaven and earth, hath not onely the great and weighty, but small matters brought unto him; the least motions of the creature, are heard and resolved, disposed and guided by his wisdome and power.

You will say, What is this greatnesse, and what are these great things? I shall hint an answer to both, for the clearing of the words.

There is a two-fold greatnesse upon the works of God. There is (so we may distinguish) First, the greatnesse of quantity; Se­condly, the greatnesse of quality or vertue: That work of God which is greatest in the bulk or quantity of it is the work of Crea­tion; How spacious, huge and mighty a fabrique is Heaven and earth, with all things compacted and comprehended in their cir­cumference! And in this work, so vast for quantity, what admirable qualities are every where intermixt! Matter and forme, power and order, quantity and quality, are so equally ballanced, that no eye can discerne, or judgement of man determine, which weighes most in this mighty work.

Yet among these works of God, some are called great in regard of quality, rather then of quantity. As it is said (Gen. 1. 16.) That God made two great lights, the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night. (Sunne and Moone) these are great lights, not that there are no lights great but these, or that both these are greater, then all other heavenly lights; for many Stars are greater then the Moon, as the doctrine and observation of A­stronomers assures us; but the lesser of these is great in regard of light and influence, excellency and usefulnesse to the world.

And as to these works of creation, so the works of providence, are great works: When God destroyes great enemies, the greatnesse of his work is proclaimed. When great Babylon, or Babylon the great, shall be destroyed, the Saints song of triumph shall be, Great and marvellous are thy works Lord God Almighty, just and true are thy wayes, thou King of Saints (Rev. 15. 3.) Great and marvellous works, why, Because thou hast destroyed great Ba­bylon, and hast executed great judgement, and powred out great wrath. So, great works of mercy and deliverance to his people, are cryed up with admiration, And hath given us such a delive­rance as this, saith Ezra, Chap. 9. 13. when the Jewes returned from their captivity out of Babylon; That mercy was a kind of miracle, that deliverance a wonder, and therefore he mentions it in termes of admiration. Such deliverance as this! How great: So great, that he had neither words to express, nor example to paralell it, but lets it stand nakedly by it selfe, in its native glory; Such deli­verance as this!

The Spirituall works of God, are yet far greater; the work of redemption, is called a great salvation, the conversion and justifi­cation of a sinner, the pardon of our sinnes, and the purifying of [Page 243] our nature, are works as high, above creation and providence, as the Heavens are in comparison of the earth. Take two or three Coro­laries or Deductions from hence: As first;

It is the property of God to doe great things: And because it is his property, he can as easily doe great things as small things.

Among men, Great spirits count nothing great; A great spirit swallowes and overcomes all difficulties: Much more is it so with the great God, who is a Spirit, all Spirit, and the father of spirits; To the great God there is nothing great: He can as easily doe the greatest as the least: 1 Sam: 14. 6. 2 Chron. 14. There Animo mag [...] nihil magnum. is no restraint to the Lord, to save with few or by many, or it is no­thing with thee to help, whether with many, or with them that have no power; It is not so much, as the dust of the ballance with God, to turne the scale of victory in battell, whether there be more or lesse: Seeing all Nations before him, are but as the dust of the ballance, as nothing, yea lesse then nothing. So that whether you put him upon any great work or small work, you put the Lord to no more stresse, to no more paines in the one, then in the other, for he doth great things; and to doe them, is his property, not his study, his nature, not his labour. He needs not make provisions or preparations, for what he would have done, the same act by which he wills the doing of a thing, doth it, if he wills. What great things hath the Lord done in our dayes. We may say as the Virgin (Luke 1. 49.) He that is Mighty, hath done to us great things, and Holy is his Name; and as they, Acts 2. 11. We have both heard and [...], Mag­nalia Dei. seen the great things of God done amongst us; and I believe grea­ter things are yet to be done. It was a great work at the begin­ning of time, to make Heaven and earth, and will it not be a great work, to shake Heaven and earth? That God hath said he will doe, before the end of time. Yet once it is a little while, and I will shake the Heavens and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land, Hag. 2. 6. The words following, seem to interpret this earthquake, and Heaven-quake, I will shake all Nations. Againe, It was a great work, to make the old Heaven and earth? and will it not be a great work, to make a new Heaven and a new earth? That is the businesse, which God is about in these letter days, as he promised, Isa. 65. 17. Behold I create a new heaven and a new earth; what is that? Jerusalem a praise, and her people a joy. When God reformeth the face of his Church, and settles the affaires of King­domes and Common-wealths, he makes new Heavens and a new Earth.

And if it be the property of God to doe great things, then, it is a duty in us, to expect great things. We ought to look for such things, as come up to, and answer the power and greatness of God; we dishonour, and as it were, humble God, when we look onely for low and meane things; Great expectations from God, honour the greatnesse of God. As the Lord expects to receive the greatest services from us, because he is a great King, Mal. 1. 14. So we ought to expect, that we shall receive the greatest mercies from the Lord, because he is a great King; It dishonours God as much and more, when we believe little, as when we doe little. A great King thinks himselfe dishonoured, if you aske him a petty suite; he looks more what becomes him to give, or doe in bounty, then the petitioner to aske in necessity. The Great Alexander, could tell his suiter (whom he had more astonisht, then relieved with his favour) That though the thing might be too great for him to re­ceive, yet it was not too great for Alexander to give. If dust and ashes can speake and think at this rate, O how large is the heart of God! Then, it is not onely our priviledge, but our duty to aske and believe great things; we ought to have a great faith, be­cause God doth great things; Is it becomming, to have a great God, and a little faith? To have a God that doth great things, and we to be a people (his people) that cannot believe great things? nay, To have a God who can easily doe great things, and we a people, that can hardly believe small things? How unbecom­ing! if some small thing be to be done, then usually faith is upon the wing, but if it be a great thing, then faith is clogg'd, her wings are clipt, and we at a stand; why should it be said unto us, as, Christ said unto his Disciples, O ye of little faith. It may be as dangerous to us, if not as sinfull, not to believe the day of great things, as to despise the [...]ay of small things. Why should not our faith in a holy scorne, baffle the greatest difficulties, in that language of the Prophet (Zech. 4. 7.) Who art thou O great Mountaine? before Zerubbabell thou shalt become a plaine.

There is another usefull consequence from this truth. He that doth great works, ought to have great praises. As, we ought to have great faith, that he will doe great things, so, he ought to have great acknowledgments, when he hath done great things. Shall God doe great things for us, and shall we give him some poor, leane, star­ven sacrifices of praise? It is very observable, that, as soon as the Prophet had described the Lord in his greatnesse (Isa. 40. 15.) [Page 245] he adds in the very next verse, And Lebanon is not sufficient to burne, nor the beasts thereof, sufficient for a burnt Offering. That is, no services are great enough, for this great God. Lebanon a­bounded in spices for Incense and perfume; it abounded with cat­tell for Sacrifice and burnt offerings; To say that Lebanon had not spice enough to burne for incense, nor beasts enough to burne for Sacrifice, shews the Lord far exalted in greatnesse, above all the praises and holy services of his people.

Lastly, seeing God doth great works for us, let us shew great zeale for, great love unto the Lord. We should aime at the doing of great things for God, seeing God indeed doth great things for us. So much of the first Attribute of the works of God. Who doth great things.

And unsearchable.] The Hebrew is, and no search. The word [...] imports the search of those things which are most abstruce and se­cret. As the heart, which the Lord onely can search, Jer. 17. 15. The heart lies too low, not onely for the eye, but for the understan­ding of man. Hence it is used, Psal. 95. 4. to note the Foundati­ons, or deep places of the earth, because they cannot be known, but by deep searchings, or rather, because they are beyond the dee­pest Penetralia ter­rae, ut Aben Ez­ra explicat, quae sci [...]i nequeunt, nisi exquisita per scrutatione, vel potiùs quòd homini minimè sunt perscuta­bilia, Deo autū in prepatulo. Buxtorf. search of man. And the same phrase we find, Psal. 145. 3. Great is the Lord and greatly to be praised, and his greatnesse is unsearchable; or according to the letter, of his greatnesse no search; as when the Psalmist speaks of the greatnesse of God, in his nature and essence, presently he adds, and of his greatnesse there is no search; so here, when Eliphaz speaks of the greatnesse of God, in his works, the next word is, they are unsearchable. As God in himselfe is great, and of his greatnesse there is no search; so many of the works of God are so great, that of their greatnes there is no search, that is, you cannot find out their greatnesse by any search. God is in working (and so are men, the hand cannot act be­yond the head) as he is in understanding. There is no searching of his understanding (Isa. 40. 28.) Therefore there is none of his working.

This unsearchablenesse of the works of God, may be considered two wayes.

  • 1. As that, which cannot be found by enquirie.
  • 2. As that, which ought not to be found or enquired.

There are some works of God, which are not to be searched into, Arcana imperij. they are to be adored by believing, not to be pryed into by sear­ching; and in that sence they are called unsearchable (Rom. 11. 33.) [Page 246] O the depth of the riches, both of the wisdome of and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgements! Many of his judge­ments, that is, his works of judgement, are so unsearchable, that it is not industry or duty, but presumption, to search into them. As those unspeakable words, which Paul heard in the third heavens, were such as (2 Cor. 12. 4.) is not lawfull for a man to utter; so un­searchable judgements may be interpreted such, as is not lawfull for a man to search. Great Princes will not have all their actions scann'd, at least, not by all, They keep state in their works. If all a mans actions be levell to the lowest, his person will be so too. The reason why the works of Antichrist were to be so mysterious and miraculous, is, because he was to be adored and Godded, to be exal­ted above all (in man) that is called God, or that is worshipped, 2 Thes. 2. 4. They who aspire to divine honour, have, or at least pretend to have many secrets. Because secret things belong unto God, things revealed unto man (Deut. 29. 29.) And as the Angell at once answers and reproves Manoah (Judg. 13. 18.) Why askest thou after my name, seeing it is secret, or wonderfull? As if he had said, thou must not enquire after my name, for it is a secret. Such prying into the works of God, is as dangerous, as prying into the Arke of God (1 Sam. 6. 19.) It were more profitable for us, and more honourable to God, if we did search our own secret wayes more, and Gods lesse.

There are other works of God, which cannot be searched, yet we may and ought to search them. It is our duty to stu­dy them, though we cannot finde them. We may search and finde many of the workes of God, with our sences; there are others which we cannot finde, though we search for them, with our reason and understanding. As some parts of the word of God (2 Pet. 3. 16.) So some part of his works are so hard to be understood, that unstable men wrest them to their own destructi­on. The minde of God is legible in very many of his works, and we may read them without a Comment or Interpreter. Other of his works are mysterious and aenigmaticall, very riddles, insomuch, that if an ordinary man looking on them, should be questioned, Ʋnderstandest thou what thou seest; he must answer, as the Eunuch did Phillip, How can I except some man teach me. And these works are unsearchable, two ways.

First, in regard of the manner of doing; we cannot finde out the wayes and contrivances of Gods work. His wayes are in the [Page 247] deep, and his foot-steps are not known, saith the Psalmist, that is, the way which God goes to the accomplishing of his ends, are oftentimes like steps upon the water, which leave no impression or track behind them.

Secondly, his works are unsearchable in their causes or ends; what it is which God aimes at, or intends, what moves or provokes him to such a course, is usually a secret. He doth such things, as no man can give an account of, or render a reason, why. Peter knew not how to construe or expound that work of Christ, John 13. when he took a Towell with a bason of water, to wash his feet. Therefore Christ tells him, What I doe thou knowest not (that is, thou know­est not, what moves me to doe this, for his eye taught him what Christ did) but thou shalt know hereafter. In due time this shall be interpreted to thee, and thou shalt know the reason, why I did this.

But it is said (and that may be an objection against both text and Exposition) Psal. 111. 2. The workes of the Lord are great, sought out of all those, that have plesure therein. To seek out, notes a full discovery. And in Psal. 106. 7. Failing in this, is charged upon the fathers, and confessed by the children, as a fault, Our fathers understood not thy wonders, that is, the great things which God did for them in Aegypt. How then is it said here, The works of the Lord are great and unsearchable.

To clear this, First, I say there are some great works of God, which are easie and plaine; And it is our duty to be acquainted with, and learned in these works of God, as well as in the word of God.

Secondly, those works whose text is hard, we must search and labour to expound them, so, as to further duty, but not to feed our curiosity; We may search them with submission to the mind of God, not for satisfaction, onely, to our own minds. We may search with desire to honour God, but not to humour our selves. We may search them to make us more holy, though not barely to make us, more knowing. Take two Corolaries from this.

First, if the works of God are unsearchable, then how unsearch­able are the counsells of God; the deep and secret counsels of God! The works of God are the cousells of God made visible. Every work of God is the bringing of some counsell of God to light. Now if we are not able to find out his counsells when they are made visible in his works; how shall we find out his counsells, when they lye hidden in his breast?

Secondly, If the works of God are unsearchable, then, we are to submit unto the dispensations of God, whatsoever they are, though we are not able according to reason, to give an account of them; though we cannot search out either the manner how, or the cause for which they were done, yet we must reverence them; And what we cannot believe by knowing, we must know by be­lieving. It is our duty, not onely to winke and believe, shut our eyes and believe, or believe when we cannot see; but, we must of­ten believe, where knowledge is shut out, believe when we can­not understand. Abraham by faith followed the call of God, not knowing whether he went, Heb. 11. 8. It is dangerous to follow men blind-fold (how seeing soever those men are) but it is safe, and our duty to follow God blindfold, how seeing soever we think our selves to be. We must not be displeased (as Joseph was at Jacob his Father, Gen. 48. 17.) when we see God laying his right hand upon Ephraim, and his left upon Manasses, doing things crosse to our thoughts; much lesse may we take upon us to direct the hand of God, as Joseph would Jacobs, where we please. The Lord knows (as Jacob answered Joseph) what he doth, and it becomes us to acquiesce in what he doth, though we know it not. Some Romish Parasites, have said of the Pope, That if he should carry thousands to hell along with him, there is no man must say to him, Sir, why doe you so? They adore him so in the unsear­chablenesse of his wayes and doings, that it is enough for them, if he doth them.

This abominable flattery of that Man of Sin, is a sober truth concerning the holy God; Though God east thousands of soules into hell, no man may say to him, what dost thou? And though God turne Kingdomes upside down, though he send great afflicti­ons upon his own people, and make them a reproach unto the Heathen, though he give them up unto the power of the adversary and make all their enemies to rejoyce, yet no man may say unto God, why doe you thus; His works are unsearchable. It is be­yond the line of a creature, to put any question, A why or A where­fore, about the work of the Greatour. Shall the thing formed say unto him that formes it, why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the Potter power over his clay?

Some think they could doe things better then God hath done, or at least that God might have done better; if they had the pow­er in their hands, things should not goe thus and thus; What an in­sufferable [Page 249] indignity is this, to the wisdome and power of God, that He whose works are unsearchable should be made accountable for his works? That of Augustine, when he was in a deep medita­tion about the nature of God, may well be applied to the works of God, who walking by the sea side in deepe thoughts of God, ei­ther heard this voyce, or was filled with this thought, That he might as soone empty the sea with, or comprehend the Ocean in one of those little cockle-shels, which lay on the shore, as with the narrow vessell of his Spirit, comprehend the infinite greatnesse of the God of Spirits.

Marvellous things.] Inscrutabile & mirabile differunt; in­scrutabile est, qued la [...]et & perquiri non po­test: Mi [...]abile est, quod ipsum q [...]idem apparet sed causa ejus perquiri non potest. Aquin. in loc. Unsearchable things and marvellous, dif­fer thus; Those things are unsearchable, which lie hid, and cannot be found: that is a marvell whose cause cannot be found, though [...] from [...] it selfe be not hid. This is the third adjunct or attribute of the works of God. The word is derived from a root, which signifies, Seperated, Disjoyned or Divided. And marvellous things are exprest by that word, because marvels or wonders are seperated or Separatus, dis­junctus. Hinc significat, mira­b [...]lia quia talia sunt à nobis se­parata, & cap­tum su erant, ita ut ratione quis asse qui, aut re praestare [...]e­queat. removed from us three degrees at least. They are seperated

First, from our knowledge or reason.

Secondly from our sense: not that marvels are invisible, mar­vels and miracles, are wrought to be seen, and the use of them lies in this, from the sence to confirme faith, or to convince of un­beliefe. Which (by the way) quite overthrowes the Popish re­fuge of a miracle, in their supposed transubstantiation of the bread at the Eucharist, who tell us of a miracle, but can shew us none. But though in all miracles and marvails the thing wrought is plain to the sences, yet both the power and manner of doing it, are re­moved from the sences, The marvell wrought is seene, but the working of the marvell is not seen.

Thirdly, Marvels are seperated or removed from our imitation; we cannot doe such things. The Lord stands alone working won­ders. They are seperated part and portion for God himself. The Egyptian Sorcerers seemed to doe by their devillish inchant­ments, what Moses did by the command and power of God: But at the best they did but seeme to doe like Moses, and presently they could not so much as seeme, Exod. 8. 18. And the Magicians did so, (that is, they attempted to doe so) but they could not. They that worke by the devils art or power, cannot worke long, They will quickly be at A Could not. Both their religions and their miraculous workes are at best but in appearance, at last they will [Page 250] not so much as appeare. In these three respects marvels are right­ly called, separate.

Further, the word also signifies sometimes, A hard or a difficult thing, because those things that are very hard and difficult have somewhat of wonder in them, and cause us to wonder at them, Deut. 17. 8. If a matter come which is too hard, the word is, which is too marvellous and wonderfull for thee, &c. And Gen. 18. 14. Is any thing too hard for me (saith God) the word is, Is any thing wonderfull to me? Nothing is wonderfull to us, but that which is too hard for us. There is nothing wonderfull to God, who doth all wonders, and is himselfe all Wonder. It hath beene said con­cerning those lovers of and searchers after secret wisedome, called Philosophers, that it doth not become a Philosopher to wonder: For admiration is usually the daughter of ignorance; we marvell at most things, because we know the causes of few things. It was therefore a shame for a Philosopher to wonder, because it betrayed his ignorance; who would be thought studied in, yea a master of all causes, and able to give a reason of all things in nature. But it is most certaine, the great God never marvelleth at any thing; For is any thing too hard for me, saith the Lord. Wonders are things too hard for us, and the same word signifies a wonder and a thing, too hard.

There are three words of neare alliancec in the Hebrew, Signes, [...] Miracles and Mervails. And they may be distinguisht thus, A Signe is the representation of a thing present, or before us: A Mi­racle or Portentum (as contra-distinct from the former) shews forth somewhat future, or, that is to come. A Mervaile, as dif­fering from both, is any act of providence, secret or separate from us in the manner of doing or producing it, a thing to us unsearch­able; so (Exod. 33. 16.) Wherein shall it be knowne, that I and thy people have found grace in thy sight (saith Moses) Is it not in that thou goest with us? So shall we be separated, I and thy people; So we translate it, or made wonderfull; that is, if thou goest along with us, thou wilt doe such marvails for us, as will make a difference betweene us, and all the people in the world: we shall be a people marvell'd at, all the world over, or a spectacle to the world, Angels and Men. The presence of God with a people, is their difference, or will make them differ, from all people with whom God is not (under the Notion of Favour and Protection) present.

Againe, Marvels are taken sometimes for Miracles, which are meerely and purely supernaturall. For in ordinary accep­tation of the word, a Marvell is only the heightning and sublima­ting of nature, or acting in the highest Spheare of nature; but a Miracle is a crossing or a contradicting of nature. A worke alto­gether above, yea against Nature. Now we are not to take mar­vels here in that strict sense, for miracles; for the great works of God are call'd marvels or wonders which yet are but either the ordinary constitutions of Nature, or the extraordinary motions of nature, as Psal. 136. 4. O give thanks to the Lord, to him, who alone doth great wonders: What are these? In the 5, 6, and 7. verses, instances are given in naturall things, as making the hea­vens and stretching out the earth above the waters. The making of those great lights the Sun and Moon Mirabilior est grani in terra multipl [...]catio, quam illa quin­que Panum. August. T [...]act. 24 in Joh in. Quicquid mi­rabile fit in mundo, profectò minus est, quàm totus hic mun­dus. Qua [...]vis ila (que) miracula visibiliū natu­ra [...]um videndi assiduitate vi­le scunt, tamen cum ea sapien­ter intuemur, inusitatissimis ra [...]ssimis (que) majora sunt. August. l. 5. de Civ Dei, cap 12.. One of the Ancients dis­coursing upon that miracle in the Gospell, The multiplying the loaves, observeth, that in naturall things there are very great won­ders, though we lightly passe them by; They were astonished to see the loaves multiplying, while they were eating: To see bread grow upon the Table or between their Teeth, made all wonder: but there is as great a miracle wrought every yeare, and no man takes notice of it: That is, when Corne cast into the ground, mul­tiplies thirty, sixty, a hundred-fold, It is (saith he) a greater miracle for corne to multiply in the earth, then for loaves to mul­tiply on the Table. And he makes a like Conclusion in his Booke of the City of God, Whatsoever is wonderfull in the world, is not so great a wonder, as the world; Yet men rarely wonder at the ma­king of the world, the Earth, the Heavens, the Sea, the Aire, every creature in them exceed in wonders▪ the things we wonder at. Ordinary works of Nature are marvellous. First, because they proceed from a divine power. 2. Because man is posed to give a reason of most of them, Canst thou tell how the bones grow in her that is with child? saith the Preacher. The bringing of an Infant alive from the Wombe is a wonder, as well as the raising of a man from the dead: And the budding of a Tree, as well as the budding of Aarons Rod Per multa sunt quae admi­rari nonsolemus propterea quod vulgo quotidi­e (que) fiunt. Reno­va & in solita commovetur animus.. The usualnesse of the one, and the rarenesse of the other is, though not the only, yet the greatest dif­ference. And as the ordinary workes of Creation, in making, so of Providence, in governing the world, are full of wonders, though they passe unobserved, Such Eliphaz takes notice of, in the words following, The disappointing of craftie oppressors and the deli­verance [Page 252] of the poore. When God shall destroy Babylon, the Song prepared is, Great and wonderfull are thy works; and (Exod. 15. 11.) from whence that is taken, Who is like unto thee, O God! Who is like unto thee, glorious in holinesse, fearefull in praises, do­ing wonders! The wonder was, a deliverance, the wonderfull deliverance of his people from Egypt, and through the red Sea. Works of judgement are often called works of wonder (Deut 28. 59.) I will make thy plagues wonderfull; and Isa. 28. 21. The Lord shall rise up as in Meunt Perazim, he shall be wroth as in the valley of Gibeon, that he may doe his worke, his strange worke, and bring to passe his act, bis strange act: What act was this? An act of judgement upon his, and his peoples enemies, as is clear 2 Sa. 5. 20. and Josh. 10. 12. where we may reade, what God did in Mount Perazim, and in the valley of Gibeon; strange works in­deed. And these works of God are called marvellous, not onely, when God is in them alone, and acts without the intervention of the creature, but when he act▪ with the creature, above the strength of a creature, so that little of the creature appeares in the act: this also is a marvell. What God doth more by a man, then man can doe, whether in strength or wisdome, ordinarily assisted, so much of a wonder shewes it selfe, in what man doth. And therefore no man is ordinarily to attempt any thing beyond his strength, for that is to tempt God, and call him to worke a miracle, at least a won­der for us, Lord (saith David, Psal. 131. 1.) Mine heart is not Non mae ex [...]uli ad ea, quae maeas vires aut inge­nium su [...]eraret. Eleganter Th [...]odoretus, Meipsum me [...] ­eba [...], & quae me excedunt, non aggrossus sum. haughty, nor mine eyes loftie; neither doe I exercise my selfe in great matters, or in things too high for me; The word is, in things too wonderfull for me; that is, I doe not ordinarily put my selfe upon things which are extraordinary, or beyond my strength and parts. I measure-my undertakings and my abilities together, and would keepe them even. I doe not put God upon doing wonders every day; therefore I set my selfe to those things, which are accor­ding to the line of man. If God call us to it, we may expect a miracle, but we must not call God to worke miracles for us, or with us. I doe not exercise my selfe in matters too high for me, Miracles or marvels are not every dayes exercise. We ought ra­ther to be above our worke, or any of our designes, then below them: but we must be sure they are not above us. It is the safest and holiest way for man, in all his actions to be upon a levell. We cannot but displease God and hurt our selves by clambering: It is but sometimes that rhe Lord will work wonders to releeve our [Page 253] necessities and help our faith, but he will never (unlesse in wrath) work wonders to please our humors, or comply with our ambi­tion. Hence observe. First,

When we see marvels done; we must acknowledgc the hand of God. Marvels are proper unto God, Psal. 75. 1. In that thy Name is neere, thy wonderous works declare: Wonderous works are an argument that God is neere: When wonders are among us, we may know, who is among us, and if so, then, this is a time wherein God is seene among us. We may well apply that of the Psalmist to our selves, Marvellous things hath the Lord done in our sight, in Ireland and in the Fields of England, Psal. 78. 12. Mervails are rare things, things seldome done, or seene.

We have things amongst us, which were never done or seene be­fore in our Nation.

A Parliament, which cannot be legally dissolved but by its own Vote.

An Assembly, where neither Diocesan Bishops nor Deane (as such) can Vote.

The three Kingdomes of England, Scotland and Ireland, entred into a solemn Covenant, approved by the Assemblies, and authori­zed by the Parliaments of two Kingdomes. May we not conclude of these in the language of the Prophet, Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Isay. 66. 8 Surely we may say as Moses to Israel (Deut. 4. 34.) Hath God assayed to goe and take him a Nation, from the middest of another Nation by temp­tation, by signes and by wonders, and by war, and by a mighty hand, and by a stretched out arme, and by great terrors, according to all that the Lord our God doth for us in England, before our eyes. To take a Nation out of the midst of a Nation, is our case. If England finding (as now it doth) her children strugling in her wombe, should goe enquire of the Lord as Rebecca did; (Gen. 25. 22.) why is it thus? The Lord may answere, as he did to her, Two Na­tions are in thy wombe, and two manner of people shall be separa­ted frem thee. A Nation fearing God, and a Nation blaspheming God, a Nation seeking Reformation, and a Nation opposing Re­formation.

Secondly, If God work mervailes and we believe him not, hath he not reason to marvell at our unbeliefe; Christ having wrought miracles to gaine the beliefe of his country men, marvailed at their unbeliefe, Mark. 6. 2, 6. Unbeliefe is a great sin at all times, [Page 254] but in a time when mervailes are wrought for the cure and healing of it; unbeleefe is a marvellous sin. Will not Christ, think you, marvell at our unbeleefe, if we beleeve not after all these marvels? Ye will not beleeve (saith Christ, and he rebukes the Jewes for it, Joh. 4.) except you see signes and wonders: Surely if they were so charged, because they would not beleeve, except they saw signes and wonders, how shall they be charged, who will not beleeve, when they see signes and wonders, especially when God seemes to work a wonder a purpose, that they might beleeve? God loves and prizes the faith of man so highly, that sometimes he bids a miracle for it, rather then goe without it. And surely now, as God hath wrought marvels, to abate the marvellous pride of the Adversary, so, to overcome the marvellous unbeleef of his own people: As hath been observed concerning the Lords swearing, As I live I desire not the death of a sinner, &c. O happy man, for whose sake the Lord sweares; but O most unhappy, who doest not beleeve the Lord, when he sweares. So, we may say of the Lords-wonder-workings: O happy people for whom the Lord works wonders; but O most unhappy people, who beleeve not the Lord, when he works wonders.

Thirdly, Seeing God works extraordinary things for us, let not us stay in ordinary duties. Let our works have somewhat of a marvell in them too? Let our repentance, and the change of our lives be marvelous; let our zeal & courage for Christ be marvelous; like that of the Apostles, who carried themseves with such heroi­cal magnanimity, in the work of the Gospel; that when the High­priest and Councel (who had convented and threatned them) saw their boldnesse, They marvelled, saith the text, Acts 4. 13. Let our love and thankfullnesse be marvellous, let us pray marvel­lously, and believe marvellously; marvels don by God, should ever work faith in man: And faith in man, doth sometime work mar­velling in God. Christ speakes with a kind of admiration to the woman of Canaan, O woman great is thy faith, Mat. 15. 28. O that his people in this Nation, would set Him, thus a wondring once more, O England great is the faith in me! O England great is thy love to me! O England, great is thy zeale for me! O Eng­land, great is thy repentance, exceeding glorious thy Reformation.

I will close this point with this one word. God hath begun to doe so many marvels amongst us, that I verily believe, the work he [Page 255] is about, will end in a marvel too: and we in the close shall be made either a wonder of mercy, or a wonder of judgement to all the Na­tion's round about.

The fourth Attribute of the works of God, raises the glory of them all. They are innumerable.

He doth marvellous things without number. The Hebrew word for word is; Ʋntill there be no number: Without number may be taken three wayes.

First, Strictly and absolutely, for that which is without number; and thus there is no number innumerable: Things absolutely with­out number would be infinite; but there cannot be two Infinits: As God is so One, and without number, that he is Infinite; so what­soever could be so many, that it were without number, would be infinite too.

Secondly, Without number, is that which man cannot reckon or cast up the summe of it. (Rev. 7. 9.) John speakes of a great multitude, which no man could number: As a small number is said to be such, as a child may write, Isa. 10. 19. So such a multitude as a man cannot write, notes the greatest number. And Heb. 12. 22. there is mention made of an innumerable company of Angels: So God calleth Abraham out, and saith Look now towards Heaven, and tell the Starres, if thou be able to number them, Gen. 12. The Starrs are innumerable, that is, beyond mans Arithmetique.

Thirdly, Things are said to be without number, or innumerable (in a more common sense) when they are a very great number; and so we find it frequent in Scripture: As that which is very high is said to be as high as heaven: Thus the discouraging Spies, de­scribe the Cities of the Canaanites, to be Cities walled up to Heaven, Deut. 1. 28. And when Sea-men or Marriners are tossed upon the waves and billowes of the Sea, they are said, to mount up to the Heaven, and to goe downe againe to the depths, Psal. 107. 26. So here a very great number, is said to be innumerable or without number: In this third, and in that second sense, the great works of God are innumerable: God hath done so many marvel­lous things, as are inpossible for man to reckon. His mighty works are not only beyond the writing of a child, but of the wisest men: The man who numbers most dayes, cannot number the wonders of God.

I shall note but one or two Instructions from this That the works of God are innumerable. First Then, what God hath [Page 256] done, he can doe it againe a second time, yea a third, a fourth time, ten times, yea ten thousand times over, if our necessity and his good pleasure meet together, for his works are innumerable: Eliphaz speakes not only of what God had done, but of what he can doe, yea of what he is a doing; he doth innumerable marvels. Some men can doe great things, many have done great things, but they cannot doe them without number; even a child may write all that any man can doe, and at most it needs but a man to reckon all the great things, which all men have done. The hand of God shortens not in an eternity, but the hand of man shortens every day, sometimes in a day, and therefore he cannot doe things in­numerable: Man cannot doe that to day which he could yester­day, whether we respect his civill abilities, or his naturall. As old Barzillai said unto David, 2 Sam. 19. when the King invited him home with him, and offered him all the pleasures of the Court, Can I any more heare the voice of singing men and singing wo­men? or can I any more tast what I eate and what I drinke? As if he should say, It is true, Sir, I have known the time when I could have made use of this royall favor, and have taken in the pleasures of your Court; I once delighted in musick, and my eare could tast a sweet voice; I once delighted in rich fare, and my pall at could tast meate and drinke, but can I any more doe thus? my naturall strength is gone, my senses cannot renew innumerable acts of pleasure: if grace doth not weane us from the abuse, yet nature will tire, in the use of worldly comforts. But the civill abilities of man wither sooner then his naturall; you may see a man, that hath done great things in a State or Common-wealth; come to him a while after, and he may say, Can I any more doe those things? I am not what I was, my power is gone: But come to God, after he hath done this or that, and a thousand great things, he will not say, can I helpe you any more? can I deliver you any more? can I destroy your enemies, can I discover their plots and counsels any more? yes Lord, as thy works are unsearchable, so they are innume­rable, and thou canst doe them for evermore. The Lord saith sometime to a people, as he did to Israel (Judg. 10. 13.) in anger, I will deliver you no more? But he never saith to any people out of weaknesse, I can deliver you no more: Psal. 78. The people provoked God by making a question of this (ver. 20.) Behold (say they) he smote the rock, that the waters gushed out, and the streames overflowed, (we acknowledge that God hath done a [Page 257] marvell) but can he give bread also? can he provide flesh for his people? surely he cannot doe this marvell also: what saith the text? The Lord heard this, and was wroth, so a fire was kindled against Jacob, and anger also came up against Israel: What doe you think that I can doe but one great thing? that I have but one blessing, but one deliverance, but one wonder? Know that I who smote the rock, can provide you flesh; I who gave you water, can give you bread, I who have discovered one wicked plot of the enemy, can discover all; I who have given you one victory, can give you a thousand; I who have given you one deliverance, can give you innumerable deliverances; Therefore take heed of setting bounds to God, of limiting the Holy one of Israel: Men love not to be limited, but God ought not. We at once provoke and disho­nour the Lord by thinking, that our wants can renew, faster then his supplies: or that our innumerable evills, shall not find innume­rable good things to ballance or remove them, from the hand of God. We weary men, when we come often to them, to doe great things for us, yea to come often for small matters, will weary men. But we never weary the Lord by comming often, we weary God, only, when we will not come often. How doth the Prophet, not only complaine, but expostulate, because that unbelieving King wearied God (take it with reverence) by not setting him aworke, and that about the hardest and most knotty peece of work, that can be, the working of a miracle, and that as hard a one as him­selfe would aske, either in the depth beneath; or in the height above. Is it a small thing with you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also, Isa. 7. 13. It is no wearinesse to God to doe innumerable mi­racles for us, but he is weary when we will not believe he can doe them. To be distrusted the doing of one, is more laborious to God, then to doe a million of Miracles.

To conclude this, take heed above all, that you limit not God in works of spirituall mercy; As, to feare, to aske pardon of sin, be­cause ye have asked it often. His great works of forgivenesse are as much without number, as any of his works, He multiplies to pardon, saith the Prophet, Isa. 55. 7. And when the people of Israel had committed a new sin, it is admirable to reade, by what argu­ment, Moses moves the Lord for pardon. It is not this (as usual­ly with men) Lord this is the first fault, Lord thou hast not been often troubled to signe their pardon: But pardon I beseech thee, [Page 258] the iniquity of this people, as thou hast forgiven this people from Egypt untill now, Numb. 14. 19. as if he had said, Lord, because thou hast pardoned them so often, therefore I beseech thee pardon them now. It is a most wicked argument to move our hearts to sin, because God will pardon often; but when we have sinned, it is a holy argument to move God to pardon againe, because he hath pardoned often before: For he pardons without number.

Secondly, Seeing God doth innumerable great things for us, let not us be satisfied in doing a few things at the command, and for the glory of God: Let us continue in acts of holinesse, charity, humility, zeale and thankfulnesse, without number: Let us never stand reckoning our duties, when we heare the mercies of God are beyond reckoning. It is a noble rule in our friendship with men, That curtesies must not be counted: I am sure it is a holy rule in our obedience to God, That duties must not be counted: God, hath no need of any one of our good works, but he will not beare it if we think we have done enow, or can doe too many. Let out Amicitia non est reducenda ad ealculos. Obediantia non est reducenda ad calculos. hearts be like the heart of God as he doth great things for us, let us doe (in what we are able) great things for God and good things for one another, without number.

So much in generall of the proofe of Gods power, by the Greatnesse &c. of his works.

JOB. Chap. 5. Vers. 10, 11, 12.

Who giveth raine upon the earth, and sendeth waters upon the fields.

To set upon high those that be low, that those which mourne, may be exalted to safty.

He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise, &c.

THis Context, from the 9. to the 17. verse, containes the second argument, by which Eliphaz strengthens his exhor­tation upon Job, to seek unto God. The argument speakes to this efect. He is to be sought; and unto him our cause is to be com­mitted, who is of absolute power, infinite in wisedome and goodnesse: But such is God; Therefore seeke to him, and commit thy cause unto him. That God is of infinite power, wisedome, &c. was proved in generall at the 9. verse, by those foure adjuncts of his works, Great, unsearchable, marvellous, and without number. And now at the 10. verse he begins his proofe, by an enumera­tion of the particular effects of Gods power, wisedome and good­nesse. The first instance is in naturall things; God doth great things and unsearchable, marvellous things without number: And would you know what those things are? You need not goe farre to enquire; there are things very neere unto us, and very common among us, which yet if they be well looked unto; will advance the power, wisedome and goodnesse of God; Every shower of raine drops down this truth, that God doth great things; He giveth raine upon the earth, and sendeth waters upon the [...] Generale no­men est ad quamcun (que) plaviam. Non desunt qui pu­ [...]ant cognationē habere cum [...] quod est hume­ctari. quòd plu­via liquesan [...]at, humectet & dissolvat dura, Mercer. fields.

There is not any difficulty about the meaning of these words which calls for stay in opening of them. Therefore in briefe, The Hebrew word for Raine, in out letters (Matar) is so neere in sound to our english, water, that some think it a deri­vative from it.

By the Rain, we are to understand, not the showres only which fall from Heaven, but all those blessings and benefits for the sup­port of our naurall life, which are the fruits of raine: He sendeth raine (as it were) on his errand, to bring or carry the blessings of plenty, and to drop fatnes on the earth. He giveth rain to the [Page 260] earth, and then the earth giveth her encrease. The Rabbins have a saying, that raine is the husband of the earth, because those show­ers foecundate the earth, and make that great mother of plenty, Imber maritus terrae. fruitfull, in bringing forth all things usefull and comfortable for the life of man.

He giveth raine upon the face of the earth, (so the letter of the Originall) that is upon the earth; as the face of Heaven, and the face of the sea, so the face of the earth, is an Hebraisme, for the earth it selfe.

It is sayed in the latter clause of the verse, that he sendeth waters upon the fields; We must distinguish these waters from the raine, taking them for rivers and streams of water, as the Psalmist speaks, He causeth the rivers to runne among the hils; and the Prophet Habaccuk, Thou cleavest the earth with the rivers.

The word is of the Dual number it the Hebrew, and therefore [...] Forma duali significantur aquae duplices, superiores in coelo, ut nubes, & inferiores in terra, ut ma­re, fon [...]es & flumina. by some applied to those two sorts of waters: or to the waters above, and to the waters that are beneath; So the waters are di­stinguished, Psal. 104. v. 3. we reade of the upper waters, Who layeth the beames of his chambers in the waters, who maketh the clouds his chariot; and of the inferior or lower waters, Gen. 1. 9. The Lord said, let the waters under the earth, be gathered into one place: and both are put together, ver. 7. God made the firmament, and divided the waters that were under the firmament, from the waters that were above the firmament. So that the waters above, and the waters below may both here be understood.

It is added further, He sendeth waters upon the fields. The word we traslate [fiolds] signifies any place, that is without [...] Nomen propr [...]è est, sed juni [...]tur saepe adverbia­liter, pro fortis; & in universū pro loco exterio­ri. Merc. Deserta, horrida loca & mortali bu inaccessa. doores, as streets and high-wayes; and because fields are without (sub dio) covered only with the canopie of the heavens, therefore we translare, he sendeth waters upon the fields. And it takes in all sorts of fields, whether till'd or untill'd: though som conceive that here Eliphaz meanes, those fields especially which are untilled, unsowne or unmanured: fields where men come not; namely desarts and wildernesses; as if he should say, there is no place but God sends waters to it; Hence the vulgar reade, in stead of fields, all places: He moistens all places with waters.

Here first, Forasmuch as an instance of Gods greatnesse, power Irrigat aquis u­niversa. Vulg. and insearchable wisedom is given in the raine, a naturall thing we may note; That

The common blessings of God, are not dispensed without a [Page 261] speciall providence: Nature workes not without the God of nature.

He doth great things; and what; He sendeth raine. The whole course of nature moves, as it is turned by the hand of God, and directed by his connsell. It is not in the frame of nature, as in ma­ny artificiall frames, which being once set up, will stand, or goe a­lone. When the Artificer hath made a clock, and put it in frame, and hung on the weights, let him goe whether he will the clock will goe; and if there were roome for the weights to descend, the clock (continuing in frame) would goe perpetually, though no hand helped or toucht it: But it is not so, in the frame and wor­kings of naturall things; God hath set all creatures in a frame and curiously ordered them, one within another, but there is no moti­on of the least wheele, much lesse of the whole fabrique, without the speciall hand of God: when raine comes, God saith goe; raine is his gift, not the clouds; the cloud receives a commission from God to distill and dissolve upon man: The most full, spongy clouds Cum plenae sunt nubes effun­dunt pluviam, non tamen abs (que) Dei jussis. Drus. distill no more then the rock did in the wildernesse, till the Lord speaks to them. As, When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the Heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth, Jer. 10. 13. So till he uttereth his voice not one single drop of all that multitude of waters, fals from hea­ven; nor will those vapours descend and returne againe to the earth, except he bid them.

He giveth raine upon the earth.

Raine is the speciall gift of God. Speciall, not in that sense as grace is a speciall gift, for raine is a common gift: but speciall, be­cause it is that, of which and about which, God takes speciall no­tice, as we reade, Amos 4. 8. I caused it to raine (saith God) upon one place, or upon one City, and not upon another: There is a speciall discriminating worke about the raine; it raines by appointment, not accident, upon one place, rather then another. And Isa. 5. 6. when God expresses displeasure against his vineyard (he saith) I will command the clouds, that they shall raine upon it: The clouds are as vast bottles full of raine, but they cannot unstop themselves, or let out one drop, untill God himselfe commands them; He melteth the clouds (as it is in Job) and then the raine falleth downe. Thou O God didst send a plentifull raine, whereby thou didst confirme thine inheritance when it was weary, Psal. 68. 9. [Page 262] How wearie or drie soever the Earth is, unlesse God by a word broach those vessels of raine, the very inheritance of God cannot have a draught, no nor a drop, to quench its thirst.

Therefore though raine be a common blessing in respect of all places and persons; yet we ought to acknowledge a speciall hand in giving it. And this checks that naturall Atheisme, which reigns in their hearts, who thinke that they are beholding only to the motion of the winds, or change of the Moon for rain: and hence in times of drought they looke most, when the wind will turne, or when the Moone will change. To confute this, the Prophet tels us by the way of question, That as Idols cannot, so neither can the Heavens give raine, Jer. 14. 22. Are there any among the vanities of the Gentiles that can cause raine? Or can the Heavens give showres? They cannot. Indeed the holy Prophet Elias speakes such language, as if he had carried the keyes of the clouds at his girdle, or had been master of the raine, 1 King. 17. 1. As the Lord liveth, there shall not be dew nor raine these yeares, but ac­cording to my word. But the Apostle James shews us what word this was, namely a word of prayer, not of command, Chap. 5. 17. Elias prayed and it rained not; againe he prayed and it rained, All the power of man cannot prevaile with the heavens to raine. but the prayer of faith can prevaile with the God of heaven, To send raine was the worke of God, though it were at the word of a man. They who denie God in one worke will quickly denie him in another. And if we deny him in lesser, yea the least of his works, in a drop of raine, we are in danger to deny him in the greater. And they who denie God in his working, have but an easie step, to the deniall of his being.

This should teach us to walke in dependance upon God for all naturall comforts. He giveth raine. All creatures drinke from Heaven, that they may have their eyes and their hearts in Heaven. And if we must walk in dependance upon God for naturall com­forts, how much more for spirituall; if for the rain of the clouds, how much more for the dews of his Spirit, and the rain of grace upon our hearts? Further observe, It is a great, wonderfull and unsearchable worke of God to send raine: For we must put the stampe of those foure characters upon all these workes, And so raine, is a great a wonderfull, and an unsearchable worke of God: so great and wonderfull that (as hath bin proved▪) no creature can commu­nicate with God, or share in the honour of this worke. The Rab­bins [Page 263] have a saying, that upon every (apex or) Tittle of the Law their hangs a mountaine of sence and holy Doctrine. We may say, that in every drop of raine there is an ocean of wisedome, of power, of goodnes, and of bounty. If we study the ordinary In ea mira Dei in suas creatu­ras specta [...]ur benignitas, cle­men [...]iae simul & potentia, undè passim Prophe­ [...]e, & praeser­tim in hoc li­b [...]o, quandò socij Job, aut Job ipse, ad­miranda Dei▪ opera▪ pr [...]ponunt pluviam inter ea, primo lo [...]o ponunt. Merc. workes of God, we shall learne somewhat extraordinary in them; common things are ful of wonder, and among all common things, none fuller of wonders then the raine; To illustrate this a little, in some particular considerations.

First, There is marvellous power seen, in causing and giving raine. Is it not marvellous power, which raises the vapours and holds (as we may so speake) A sea of water above the earth? That such mighty seas and floods of water hang in the ayre, and thence are distill'd and sprinkled downe (as Job speakes) in small drops, are acts and arguments of the wonderfull power of God.

Secondly, Behold in the raine the wonderfull goodnes of God: who by this meanes cooles and refreshes, nourishes, and suckles all earthly living creatures. When the ground is enapt and gapes, as it were with open mouth, the Lord opens these bottles and gives it drinke. And a miracle of goodnes is seene in this forasmuch as when his very enemyes hunger, he thus feeds them, when they are naked he thus cloaths them, when they thirst, he thus gives them drinke. Mat. 5. 45. He sendeth raine upon the just and upon the unjust: They are maintained in life by the goodnesse of God, whose lives maintaine a continuall warr against his justice.

And as there is a wonder of goodnesse in giving rain for the use of evill men: So there is a wonder of bounty in sending raine upon those places, which are not of use to any man; he sendeth waters upon the fields, that is, all over the world. Hence when Elihu would set forth the marvellous power and bounty of God, he ex­emplifies it in this (Job 38. 25.) Who hath devided a water course for the overstowing of waters, to cause it to raine on the earth where­no man is, and on the wildernes, where there is no man? Such an o­pen and bountifull house doth the Lord of Heaven and earth keep, that rather then any shall want, he will (in a sence) let the wa­ter runne wast, God will not have so much as an herbe or a plant to want: though there be no man to come there, yet the grasse and shrubs shall have drinke, and tast of his bounty.

And so legible is that goodnes of God, which is written with drops of rain, so wonderfull his power and bounty in giving rain, that the Prophet wonders, at the stupidity of those men, who are [Page 264] not convinced of and taught obedience by it. They have not said, let us fear the Lord that giveth the first and the latter raine in his season, (Jer. 5. 24.) As if he should say, what a strange thing is it that sweet showers of raine have not softened the hearts of men, into the feare of God, and made them blossome with and bring forth abundantly the fruits of holines? Hereupon it is very re­markeable, how Moses makes this a motive to perswade the chil­dren of Israel to obedience in Canaan, because that country stood in much need of raine, which Egypt, from whence they came, did not, Deut. 11. Therefore shall ye keepe all the Commandements, which I command you this day, ver. 8. For the land whither thou goest in to possesse it, is not like the land of Egypt, from whence ye came out, where thou sowest thy seed, and wateredst it with thy foot, like a garden of herbes. That is Egypt being a flat plaine coun­try, all upon a levell, when the Land wanted moysture, thou didst not stay for or depend upon the raine, to moisten it, but with thy foot, thou diggedst draines and madest sluces or water-courses, from the river side (meaning Nilus that famous river, which ran quite through Egypt) and that refreshed thy lands and made them fruitfull. But (Canaan is another kind of Country, vers. 11, 12.) the Land whether thou goest in to possesse it, is a Land of hils and val­leyes, and drinketh water of the raine of Heaven. A land which the Lord thy God careth for, his eyes, are upon it, &c. As if he had said, Canaan is not a country capable of being water'd by the foot, it is so mountanous and uneven. All the labour of hand or foot, cannot bring the streams upwards, to give thy thirstie land drinke, it must drinke from heaven, or be burnt up and parcht with thirst, and if so, then, that must be the Lords care, his eye must observe▪ when tbou wantest raine, his hand must make water-courses in the heavens, and open the sluces and cataracts of the clouds for thee. And wilt thou not serve this God in duty, who in bounty thus ser­veth thee, and gives thee such a sensible evidence of his care over thee? The Apostle Paul preaches this to the Gentiles, as Natu­rall Theologie, to leave them inexcusable, Though he suffered all Nations to walke in their owne wayes (in that he gave them not either the light or restraint of grace, yet he did give them light and restraint too in nature) Neverthelesse he left not himselfe, with­out witnesse, in that he did good, and gave us raine from heaven. Acts 14. 17. As if he had said, though yee have not had the raine of the word, yet the raine of the cloud, if such a Preacher of Gods power and [Page 265] goodnesse, as will leave you for ever without excuse. The Lord himselfe seemes to glory in this, as one of the chiefest of his works: (Job 38. 37.) Who can number the clouds in wisdome? Or who can stay the bottles of heaven? I challenge all creatures to a com­petition with me in this. And again in this book (Ch. 36. 26.) Elihu lifts up the greatnesse of God in this act of his providence, Behold God is great, and we know him not; (wherein doth he instance his greatnesse?) it follows, ver. 27. For he maketh small the drops of water, they powre downe raine according to the vapour thereof. Reade paralell texts, Jer. 10. 13. Psal. 65. 10, 11. Psal. 147. 8. So much of this first worke of God, the raine; and of his power, wisdome, goodnes, bounty visible and apparent in it.

The second instance of Gods power and wisdome, &c. is in ci­vill things, both in setting up and pulling downe: First, in raising and setting up.

To set up on high those that be low, that those which mourne may be exalted to safetie. As if he should say will you see another way, wherein God shews himself in his power, wisdome and goodnesse? It is in looking thorough the world, for such as are low that he may lift them up: in espying out mourners and weeping eyes, that he may wipe them, and more; exalt them to safety.

Some of the Jewish Writers connect this verse with the for­mer; making this as an effect of Gods bounty & wonderfull worke in sending raine. He sendeth raine and showers upon the earth with such plenty of blessings, that by this means, many who were poore, low, meane and sad-hearted, may be set in high estate, and exalted unto safety. And there is a truth in it, Gods blessing up­on the earth hath exalted many, that were low, to an high estate, to riches and prosperity.

But rather, we shall take it in a more generall sence; And so E­liphaz in these words seemes to comfort Job by giving him a hint, that though his estate was now very low, yet if he would apply himselfe unto God, as he had advised, ver. 8. By seeking unto and committing his cause to him, as low as he was, he might be set high againe; and though he was now a mourner, sitting in dust and ashes, He might be exalted to joy and safetie; for in this the power, wisdome and goodnesse of God are usually put forth and exalted.

The words carry an allusion to that custome of Princes and Ma­gistrates, who sit in high places, upon erected thrones. As (1K. 16. [Page 266] 19.) it is said of Solomon, that he built him a magnificent throne or chaire of state, which had an assent of six steps to it, he sate on high. And the Prophet Isaiah (Chap. 6. ver. 1.) describes the Lord in the same manner, sitting in state, I saw the Lord (saith he) sit­ting upon a throne, high and lifted up. The pride and arrogancy of the Assyrian is thus exprest (Isa. 14. 13.) He hath said in his heart, I will exalt my throne above the stars, I will sit also upon the Mount of the Congregation. So that to sit on high, is as much as to be preferred or advanced, whether we respect honour or riches, dignity or authority.

To set on high those that be low.

The word may note either those, that are low in their own eyes, or those that are made low by others, active or passive lownesse. Grace in our own hearts causes the former lownesse, and sinfull oppression from the hand of others, causes the latter. The former are humble, the latter are humbled; The Lord sets both these on high. And

Those which mourne.] The Hebrew word signifies to be [...] à [...] Obscurus, obscu­ritus, luce pri­vatus fuit, ni­gruit per Meta­phoram c [...]n [...]ri­status fuit, in tristitia enim fugit splēdor fa­ciei. Sic latinè, Atriti dicuntùr lugentes [...], maesti vul­tus. blacke, darke, or obscured. And the reason why that word is borrowed to note mourning or sorrow, is, because sorrow causeth blacknesse, or darknesse of habit or countenance; Mourning and blacknesse usually goe together (Jer. 4. 28.) For this cause shall the earth mourne, and the heavens above shall be blacke. And usu­ally Mourners goe in blacke, it is the die and dresse of Mour­ners. As white is the colour of joy, Let thy garments be alwayes white, saith the Preacher to him, that is to eat his bread with joy, Eccles. 8. 8. Yea the very beauty of the face is obscured, the light of the countenance shadowed or clouded with teares and sorrow. Hence the Seventy render it, They whose faces are sad or sowre. It is the word used, Mat. 6. 16. When yee fast be not as the hypo­crites, of a sad countenance; It implies an affected, studied sad­nesse, severity, austerity, grimnesse, gastlinesse, unpleasantnesse of countenance, proceeding from art, rather then from nature, much lesse from grace, as the words following imply; for they disfigure, vitiate or discolour their faces, corrupt or abolish their native complexion, so as it appeares not, what it is, that they may appeare, what they are not. Hypocrisie can paint the face with blacke, as well or rather worse then pride with red and white; and so doth reall sorrow sometimes, whether for sin or outward [Page 267] affliction. True passion in the heart, will dim the brightnesse and staine the beauty of the face.

These Mourners shall be exalted to safety.] The word which [...] in lo [...] [...]ub [...]mi sterit exal [...]a [...]us, adeò ut ab hostibus pertingi neque­at. Per Meta­phorem, ta [...]us, in expugnabilis. Hinc [...] [...]u [...]is. Olim munitio­nes extrueb [...]n­tur in locis edi­tioribus in mon­tibus prae uptis & inaccessis, ut latinê, arx ab hoste arcendo dicto est. we translate Exalted, signifies to set in a high place, and in a place so high that a man so placed, is beyond the reach of danger or the power of an adversary; it is to be set upon a place impregnable; Hence the word is used for a Fort, Tower, or Castle, because forts and Towers, being places of defence, were for the most part built upon some high place, upon some rocke or praecipice (Prov. 18. 10.) The name of the Lord is a strong Tower; That is, we are as safe under his protection, as in a strong Tower founded on the stee­pest rocke. And the Prophet describing the safety of him who walks uprightly, gives it in this word; The place of defence shall be the munition of Rocks, Isa. 33. 16. So Jer. 48. 1. Misgab is con­founded and dismayed; That is, the high place or Castle of defence is dismayed, That word which is common to all places of safety, being supposed by our translators, as the proper name of some one place of more eminent safety.

Further although this word (Exalted) implies safety, yet in the Originall, we have two words, They are exalted to safetie. He that is exalted (according to the sence of that word) is safe: But to shew the compleatnesse of their safety, safety or salvation is expressed. He is exalted to safety with salvation, or he is safely [...]. Endyadis. exalted in safety. It is a full and a perfect safety, to which God exalts his mourners and oppressed servants. They are as safe as salvation it selfe can make them. That's the force of the He­braisme.

From the former clause of the verse, we may observe.

First, That advancement is the gift of God.

He setteth on high those that are low, Psal. 75. 6, 7. Promotion commeth neither from the East, nor from the West, nor from the South (neither this way nor that way, nor any way of man) but God putteth downe one and setteth up another. When a man is ad­vanced by the favour of a Prince, it is God that setteth him up. If a man be advanced by the vote of the people, yet it is God that setteth him up. Though a man be advanced by that, which may seeme to have most contingency in it, by a lot, yet it is God that setteth him up, Prov. 16. 33. The lot is cast into the lap, but the whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. The Lord gives speciall di­rection to mans peradventure, and certainly determines, what we call contingent.

Secondly, observe;

They that are low and mourning, are nearest to exaltation and safety.

To be very low, it is to be (as it were) in a due posture and readinesse to be exalted very high; He setteth the low on high (Luk. 1. 51.) He hath put downe the mighty from their seate, and hath exalted the humble and meeke; or, hath exalted the lowly and the meeke. We are not to understand it onely of those, who are low, that is, lowly in minde (that frame of heart which is wrought above in the highest heavens (is in this sense) lowest up­on the earth) but we may understand it likewise of those, who are low in their estates; (many that are low in mind, may be high in place; a man may have aboundance of humility in the height of outward eminency) Therefore (I say) we must take in both; Before honour goes humility, as a high mind before a fall, Prov. 15. 33. And (Psal. 113. 6, 7.) He raiseth up the poore out of the dust, and listeth the needy out of the dunghill, that he may set him with Princes, &c.

And as it is in reference to particular persons, so to the Church and people of God in generall; when they are low, then look for their raising up. The Scripture is frequent in this, Deut. 32. 36. Psal. 12. 6. Psal. 102. 13. And in that notable place, Isa. 33. 9, 10. The Ambassadours of peace weepe bitterly, the earth mourneth, and Lebanon languisheth, and Carmel shakes off her fruit, &c. All places, every creature is brought in, mourning with that mourning people. When it was thus with them, Now will I arise, (saith the Lord) now will I be exalted, now will I lift up my selfe. There are three Nowes for it, to note That the speciall Now of their exaltation. But the text saith, God would then be exalted. Was he brought low? God is alwayes alike exalted in himselfe, but he is not alwayes alike exalted in his people; therefore when he saith, now will I be exalted, the meaning is, I will exalt this people who are low, that my name may be exalted and lifted up in the sight of all people.

Therefore our low estate should be so farre from sinking, that it should lift up our faith in beleeving deliverance and exaltation. A low estate, is a great advantage for faith; faith hath surest footing when we lye prostrate upon the ground: There faith stands firmest, because there faith meets with most promises; Promises are the foundation of faith. The people of God have never so much of the [Page 269] word about them, as when they have least of the world about them. The covenant sits closest to us, when we are divested of the crea­ture. When the river is at the lowest ebbe, we are sure the tide is comming in: The night is darkest a little before day breakes: When the dayes are shortest, and the winter sharpest, then the spring of mercy is at hand. As the highest flourish of ungodly ones, is the immediate forerunner of their downfall (Psal. 92. 7.) When the wicked spring as the grasse, what then? would you know the meaning of it? The next words are a comment upon the for­mer: It is, that they shall be destroyed for ever; So, the lowest down­fall of the godly, is usually the immediate forerunner of their ad­vancement. When the godly wither as the grasse, the interpretation of it is, That they shall flourish for ever.

Observe in the third place, from that word, exalted to safety That

God can set his people on high, beyond the reach of all their ene­mies. Beyond the reach of their heads or counsels, and beyond the reach of their hands and swords; Isa. 33. 16. The munitions of rockes shall be their place of defence: He setteth them on high, that no ladders can be found long enough to scale these rocks, nor any Artillery or engine, strong enough to batter them downe; And least any should say, but we will hold the siege, till we starve them out; it followes in the text Bread shall be given him, his waters shall be sure. I remember a story in Alexanders warres, that when he came to besiege the Sogdians, a people who dwelt upon a rock, or had the literall munition of rocks for their defence, they jeered him, and asked him whether his Souldiers had wings or no? Unlesse your Souldiers can fly in the ayre, we feare you not. It is a most certaine truth, when God exalts a people, he can set them upon a rock, so high, that unlesse their adversaries have wings, and those more then Eagles wings, to soare higher then God himselfe, they are beyond annoyance. He carries his owne upon Eagles wings, what wings then must they have, who get a­bove his people?

There are these two things, about which the thoughts of men are most conversant. The one is, to be set on high; the other is, to be set in safety. They both meet in the mercy here promised; He setteth on high those that are low, that's their honour; He exalts them to safety, that's their comfort. The first thoughts of men are spent to get a great estate, but their next thoughts are to keep [Page 270] and protect it. Experience hath often shewed us the men of the world, rolling riches and Titles together into a mountaine, but it hath been a mountain of snow, one hot day hath melted all down. The mountain of outward blessings, upon which God raiseth his people, shall be (if he pleases) like a mountain of Adamant, which cannot be melted, or like mount Sion, which cannot be removed. A high place is seldome a safe place: All high things are tottering, N [...]tare solent excelsa omnia. and the more high, the more tottering. Then how unsearchable is the wisdome, how great the power of God, who can set his peo­ple very high, and yet very safe? who can make a man stand as firme and steady upon the highest pinnacle of honour, as upon a levell ground, or in a valley of the lowest estate and condition. He exalts to safety.

And hence wee may draw downe a difference between Gods exaltation of his own people, and the exaltation of his enemies and wicked ones. Wicked men are oft times exalted, and God ex­alts them, though they know it not: but how? He exalts them to a high place, but doth exalt them to a safe place? No, the Psal­mist, after a long temptation, concludes, Thou hast set them in slip­pery places, thou castest them downe into destruction; how are they brought into desolation, as in a mement, Psal. 73. 18, 19. Haman was exalted high, but not in safety: Many are exalted, as Jezabel exalted Naboth, high among the people; but it was to stone him, rather then to honour him. It is said of Pharaoh, he lifted up the head of his chiefe Baker, he lifted up his head out of prison in­deed, but he lifted up his head to the gallowes also; he lifted him out of prison, but it was unto his death. Such is the lifting up of wicked men, they may be set on high, but they are never set in safety. How many have we seen suddenly advanced, and as sud­denly depress'd? We are never safe, but where God sets us, or while God holds us in his hand. Fourthly observe;

It is a wonder, a wonderfull work of God, to exalt those that are low, and set mourners in safety. The 107 Psalme, is a Psalme, recounting the wonderfull works of God; O that men would praise the Lord for his wonderfull works! is the burthen of that holy song. And all those wonders conclude in this, ver. 39. 40. Againe, they are minished and brought low, through oppres­sion, affliction, and sorrow: what then? He powreth contempt up­on Princes, &c. yet setteth he the poore on high from affliction, and maketh him families like a flock. How wonderfull is this, [Page 271] that the Lord will give Kings for the ransome of his people, and to raise his poore, will powre contempt upon Princes? The high­est must downe, rather then his low ones shall not be set on high. There are foure things, which encrease this wonder, and make it exceeding wonderfull. First, These poore have no strength, (Deut. 32. 36.) He sees that their strength is gone. Secondly, Ma­ny times they have no hope, no faith, When the Son of Man comes, shall he finde (among low ones) faith (this faith to be exalted) up­on the earth, Luk. 18. 8. Thirdly, They have many enemies, sub­till enemies, powerfull enemies, confident enemies, enemies (above hope) arrived at assurance, that they shall keep poore ones at an under for ever. Lord (saith David) how many are they that trou­ble me? So many they were, that he could not tell how many. Fourthly, They are supposed to have no friends, none to appeare for them. Let us persecute and take him (say they) for there is Psal. 71. 11. none to deliver him. Not a man, no nor God, as they conclude, They say of my soule, there is no help for him in his God. I need not say, it is a wonder to exalt a people, upon all these disadvantages: The fact speakes; should you see a man trod upon the ground, and many there holding him downe, one by the arme, another by the leg, a third laying a great weight upon his breast, were it not a wonder to see this man rise up, and rescue himselfe from them all? Thus it is with the Church and servants of God, when they are low, all the world is upon their backs; the world of wicked ones hang about them, one with his power, another with his po­licie, all with their utmost endeavours to hold them downe; yet the Lord sets them on high, who were thus low, and exalts them to safety, who were thus in danger. Oh that men would praise the Lord for his goodnesse, and declare his wonderfull workes to the chil­dren of men.

And this is further cleared in the 12th verse, He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hand cannot performe their enterprise. As if Eliphaz should say, would you know, how God exalteth his people, and setteth them in safety? 'Tis true, they have many enemies many that plot and devise evill against them, but the Lord breakes their plots, he out-plots them; He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, &c. And as this is a proof of the former, so it is a further instance of Gods wonderfull works. The first was in naturall things, sending raine; The second and third were in civill things, first, exalting his own people; and secondly, in de­feating [Page 272] the policies and power of their adversaries: so then, this twelfth verse, may be taken either as it hath reference to the for­mer, or as a further instance of Gods wisdome and power.

He disappointeth the devices of the crafty.] Or, he defeateth the purposes of the subtill (so Mr Broughton readeth it) that their hands can bring nothing soundly to passe. The Apostle in 1 Cor. 3. 19. sets the holy stampe of divine authoritie, upon this whole booke, by quoting this or the next verse, as a proofe of his doc­trine; For it is written (saith he) He takes the crafty in their own counsell; He disappoints the devices of the crafty (saith Eliphaz) and, He takes the wise in their own craftinesse.

He disappointeth.] The word signifies to breake, to breake a [...] à radice [...] fractus contri­tus. thing to peeces: and by a metaphor to disappoint or to defeate, because if an engine or instrument, with which a man intends to work, be broken, he is disappointed of his purpose and cannot goe [...] Confregit, dis­sipavit. Meta­phoricè irritum fecit Latinè po­test reddi [...]abro­gari. on with his work: So here, He breakes the devices of the crafty, the crafty frame very curious engines and instruments, they lay fine plots and projects, but the Lord breakes them, and then they are defeated or disappointed. The word is often used for break­ing or making voyd the law, as Psal. 119. 126. Ezra 9. 13 be­cause wicked men, as much as in them lies, would defeate and dis­appoint the holy purpose & designe of God, in giving those lawes. They would repeale & abrogate the laws of God, that they might enact their own lusts. They would doe that by the will of God, which the Lord doth with their wills, Null and disappoint it.

The devices.] The word which we translate, devices, signi­fies [...] à radice [...] Cogitavit, ex­cogitavit, deno­tat opus inge­niosum, inven­tum artificium, quia artificium fit p [...]r cogita­tionem. not barely cogitation or thinking, but excogitation, or studied thinking; not only a naturall thought, but an artificiall thought, or thoughts made up and formed after long debate of a businesse in our own breasts: This is properly exprest, by devising. Those pooles of water in the 7•h Cant. ver. 4. are called from this word, The pooles in Heshbon; some take Heshbon for a City. (Numb. 21. 26.) and so it notes the place where those pooles were: Others translate it thus, Aisworth on the Cant. Pooles artificially made; And we may observe much skill and curiosity used, in making pooles or water-workes. So (Exod. 28. 8.) the holy girdle which was made for the high-Priest, is called, a curious girdle; it is from the same root; be­cause that girdle was made of cunning work, and exquisite em­broyderies. So that, this word notes, the very spirits and quin­tessence of sinfull wit, drawne out for the devising of evill. In [Page 273] the 119. Psalm. vers. 29. David useth this word, to shew the ac­curatenesse, and holy curiosity which he used in surveighing his own life. I thought on my wayes, that is, I studied my selfe and my works, with greatest exactnesse, to find out every error or failing, or to frame my wayes to a haires bredth (if it were possible) ac­cording to rule; which answers the Apostles phrase, Ephes. 5. of walking circumspectly or exactly. Grace will vie it with sinfull craft, for exactnesse, that will make as curious workes or devices in holinesse, as the other can in wickednesse.

Of the crafty. Here the workmen are described as well as their work; their works are devices, and the workmen are crafty. As the man is, so is his imployment; we are in working as we are in being. Devices are the proper trade of crafty ones. The Originall word, sometimes imports holy wisedome; and sometimes corrupt and sinfull wisdome: We reade it in a good sense (Prov. 1. 4.) and (Prov. 22. 3.) The prudent man (a man that hath holy craft and skill in him) foresees the plague, and hideth him­selfe; Againe, Prov. 8. 12. I wisdome dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions. But usually the word is taken in an ill sense, for subtill and sinfull craft, for craftinesse and subtilty to doe mischiefe; therefore the vulgar translates it, He disappointeth the devices of the Malignants; noting, that it is not an honest craft, but a malignant craft, by which the counsells and devices of these men are contrived or acted: (Psal. 83. 3.) that word is used, They have taken crafty counsell against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones: And Gen. 3. 1. Now the Serpent was more subtill than any beast of the field; The word properly signifies to be [...] Nadus, signifi­cat etiam invo­lutum vas [...]um, cuju [...] in animo plures sunt flexiones, & diverti [...]ula naked; and by a metaphor, to be subtle, fly, crafty, nimble; because men, who (as tumblers, racers, rope­dancers) are to doe a thing nimbly and speedily, subtilly and sli­ly, often stript themselves of all, but will never cumber them­selves with many cloathes. We know, that craft alwayes puts a cloake or veile upon actions, and walks in a disguise: yet because the crafty man is so nimble to turne and wind, and vary himselfe a thousand wayes, both for the plotting and acting of his designes, therefore he is elegantly named, from nakednesse. Hence also in the Greek language [...] ex­er [...]eo, unde [...]. Locus ubi nudi se exerceban­tur nanc su­mitur pro ludo literatio ubi ingenia litteris d [...]scendis exer­centur, Nudi s [...]nt agilio [...]es; & m [...]us prae­pediti., the word which signifies nimble acting or exercising the mind or body, as also places and Schooles where those exercises were performed and taught, is derived from na­kednesse, or from being naked: And it is observeable, that our first [Page 274] parents Adam and Eve, before they sinned, are called (Gen. 2. 25.) naked; And the serpent in the very next verse, (being the first of the third chapter) is called subtle, by one and the same word. Our first parents were naked outwardly (innocency nee­ded none, and glory shall need no cloathing) they were also (in opposition to evill) naked inwardly; they were simple, plaine-hearted, without any cloake of malice or wickednesse. But the serpents nakednesse, notes only a fitnesse, slynesse, readinesse or activenesse to doe evill: For he was double cloath'd with craft, cloakt and hooded with subtilties, to act mischiefe unseen. The naked-crafty ones of the text, are the seed of the serpent, his children, and therefore they beare their fathers name The Chal­dee paraphrast tells us, that the crafty ones here meant by Eli­phaz, were especially the Egyptians, who when they would op­presse the people of God, said, Come on, let us deale wisely with Intell [...]git cogi­tationes Egyp­tiorum, qui sa­piemes f [...]er [...]nt ad malefaciendum Isaeli. [...]ac. them, least they multiply, Exod. 1. 10. A crafty man, is one, who hath not alwayes more understanding then his neighbour but ever lesse conscience: Yea, how great soever his wit is, his conscience is so little, that it never stands in his light, whatsoever he is doing. He takes measure of his actions, not by what he ought to doe, but by what he would have done; and yet, he can seldome doe what he would, for the Lord disappoints the devices of the crafty so, that as it followes in the text,

Their hands cannot performe their enterprise

To every businesse, two things are required, Invention and Action; or the electing of Meanes, and the pursuing of the End: The former is Head-work, the latter is Hand work. The hands are the instruments of action, as the head is the instrument of in­vention and consultation. These crafty heads were at work be­fore, now their hands goe to it: What they devise craftily, they would act industriously; but they cannot, Their hands cannot per­forme their enterprise.

The word which we translate Enterprise, signifies Being, as also reason, wisdome, and vertue; because wisdome, vertue and [...] a [...]radi [...]e [...] ab [...] Denotat essen­tiam, rationem sapientiam, vi [...]tuiem sem­per permanen­tem alijs rebus in mundo trans­euntibus. Hinc significat, omne quod cum in­teplectu & ra­tione fic; & hic specialiter proeo, quod qula sibi statuit ut faciat quo fineē optatum assequa­tur, etiam in ma­lum. Mer. reason, are as it were, the being, stability & permanency of things; And therefore as in the Hebrew, this word signifying wisdome & vertue, is derived from a root, which notes Being. So the word signifying wickednesse and folly, is derived from a root (as some Criticks observe) which notes onely a negative, or a not Being of [Page 275] any thing: because wickednesse is nothing, or it is good for nothing: Those things which want wisedome and reason, are as if they were not, and shortly will not be at all. Hence some render the words thus; Their hands cannot performe their wisedome, that is, they cannot bring to passe that enterprise, which they had determined and layd (as themselves conceived) with so much wisedome and strength of reason. Mr Broughton to the same sense: Their hands brings nothing soundly to passe. And the Chaldee exemplifies it in the Egyptians before mentioned, who as the holy story informes us, could not effect, that which they had consulted with those depths of policie; and principles of sinfull wisdome, The destruction of the children of Israel. Here then we may observe. First, That

The wisdome of naturall men is nothing but craft or wit to doe wick­edly.

The Prophet Jeremie gives us this character of them, They are wise to doe evill (Jer. 4. 22.) And to be wise to doe evill is very ill wisedome, the worst wisedome, indeed meere folly; better be a foole, than to be but so wise: And these have it from their father, it dwels and is derived in their blood, They are the seed of the Ser­pent (as was toucht before) and his subtilty was made the instru­ment of the greatest evill, the tainting of that first created innocen­cie▪ and the overthrow of man: Now they are called the serpents seed, because they are like the Serpent; the Serpent was the subtillest of all the beasts of the field, and these (as Christ speakes of the men of the world) are wiser in their generation than the children of light; yet is but in their generation, and their wisdome lasteth but for their generation, if it last so long: Elymas (Acts 13. 10.) being charged to be full of all subtilty and mischiefe, is called at the next word, child of the Devill. Subtill to doe mischiefe, is the Genius or disposition of the Devils children; and they shall have the serpents, the Devils portion: For as the serpent, who was once the subtillest of all the beast of the field (applying his subtilty to mischiefe) became the most cursed of of all the beasts of the field; so they who are thus the subtillest among the children of men, shall be the most cursed of all the children of men, Jer. 18. 18. we find crafty men in consultation, and under a curse. Come (say they) let us devise a device against Jeremiah, and let us smite him with the tongue; Let us devise devices, it is the same word in the text, but doubled for greater emphasis: These were their crafti­masters; [Page 276] To devise devices, notes more then ordinary skill in that black art; as to work a work (Joh. 6. 28.) notes great in­dustry and intention of the mind in working. Some play their works rather then work their works. I must worke the workes of him that sent me, saith our Lord Christ, Joh. 9. 4. None ever laboured as Christ laboured, therefore his was working a worke. As (I say) to worke a worke, notes great industry in working; so to devise a device, implies much cunning and skill laid out in devising. Now as these men would be witty above others in de­vising evill, so they are cursed above others in bearing evill. The Prophet gives them their load, ver. 21, 22. Therefore deliver up their children to the famine, and powre out their blood by the force of the sword, and let their wives be bereaved, &c. And it is most just, that they should be deepest in the curse, who are deepest in such craft; for the truth is, that, Every sinfull act, the more skill there is in it, the more sinne there is in it; it is best to be a dullhead, a very bungler in doing mischiefe. Wit commends and sets off other things, bue it makes sin the more sinfull and deformed. Secondly observe; That

Satan makes use of subtle, crafty men, and abuseth their parts for his own purposes. He disappointeth the devices of the crafty. God never disappointeth those, whom he sets aworke: If God disappoints the devices of men, these devices were not of God; Satan sets those aworke, whose work God spoiles. The Lord loves to breake Satans engines, tooles and instruments. Christ came to destroy the works of the Devill, both his works within us, and his workes against us. All Satans works and workmen shall rue it, when Christ pleases. And here we see whom Satan sets aworke, even men of the finest wits, of the most reaching braines, of the decepest judgements and richest endowments: these he draweth in to his pay, and makes serviceable for his ends; that's Satans designe; such as are amongst men, as the serpent a­mongst the beasts, the most subtill of all, these Satan makes use of: The deepe policie of an Achitophel, the Great Oracle of his times for counsell, he desires to improve against a David; The high parts and learning of a Julian, he desires to improve and boyle up against the Christians; such a one will not only Fire and sword, but set hard to jeere and wit them out of the profession of the Gospell.

And it is observable, that the seeds of the greatest heresies and [Page 277] errours, that ever poyson'd the spirit of man, or vext the Church of God, have been sowne in that ranke soyle, the wits of Philoso­phers. Which gave Tertullian occasion to call Philosophers, The Philosophi hae­reticorum Pa­triarchae. Tert. Patriarkes of Heretickes, or The Patrons of Heresies; They were men of high conceits and apprehensions, and in those fertile and rich grounds, Satan with great successe cast the tares of errour. When Christ came into the world, he had most opposition among the craftie Scribes and Pharisees; And Herod the Fox (as Christ himselfe calls him for his subtilty) was a notorious instrument of Satan, to hinder the receiving of Christ. Our Lord Christ some­times chuseth the simplest the meanest the plainest men, fisher­men to do his worke. But Satan chuseth the subtilest he can find in learned Throngs, to send of his errand. The reason of this differ­ence betweene Christs choise and Satans, is; Satan cannot make a Mercury out ef every block, he is not able to give a man understan­ding, wisedome or abilities for his worke: neither can he increase or improve any mans parts and gifts: he must have instruments ready to his hand, he can but put them forward and tempt them on. He will give such as are strong and craftie, many motives to serve him, but he cannot furnish them with strength or craft to serve him. But Christ can give gifts to men, which they have not, and raise the parts, which they have. He can make himself a Mer­cury, a messenger out of any blocke. Christ can send a foole of his errand, and cause him to doe it wisely; He can cause the stamme­ring tongue to speake plaine, and the plainest man to speake the highest Rhetorick. When a Moses complaines of a slow tongue, he can say, I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say, Exod. 4. 12. If he finds us not fit to doe his businesse, he can make us fit. If Christ please, he can make a man master of his trade, before, or as soone as ever he is a servant to it. Thus, with­out the wisdome of the world, Christ overcomes the wisdome of the world; And by the foolishnesse of preaching (as men count foolishnesse) saveth those that beleeve (1 Cor. 1. 21.) the foolish­nesse of God is wiser then man, That is, those instruments which Christ impioyes, how foolish soever men account them, shall foile all the wisdome of man.

Therefore let no man boast of his natural parts, unles they be spi­riualiz'd, and resign'd up (for such Christ commonly uses, though he can make use of others) to the service of Christ. Consider to whom you are instrumentall, with your parts and knowledge. All [Page 278] wit out of Christs work, degenerates into craft, and wisdome into wickednesse. It is Satans worke to sollicite the learning of men (even as an Adulterer sollicites the beauty of women) that he may commit folly with it, and beget some monstruous birth of mis­chiefe and villanie.

For, when such appeare on Satans side, they are a great credit to his cause, and by the reputation of their learning and parts draw others to it. Doe ye not see (will he suggest to inferiour ones) such and such wise, learned men, goe this way; such learned Di­vines, such learned Lawyers, such deepe Politicians, and doe you scruple? And how many have been caught in this sna [...]e, and led a­side by the noise of their abilities, whom Satan abuseth to his own side; what? such wise men, such learned men, thinke thus, and doe you simple ones stand off? Hath he not reason then to say of wise men, (as it was once said of one) Seeing ye are such, I wish you Cum talis sis, u­tinam noster es­ses. Habeo Themi­stoclem Athe­niensem. would come over to me: and to bragge of them, as much as ever that Persian Monarch did of Themistocles, whose revolting to him, from the Grecians transported him so, that he broke sudden­ly out of his sleepe with these words, I have Themistocles the A­thenian. I remember what Augustine observes (it is a very remar­kable passage) in an Epistle unto a young noble man of great lear­ning, who it seems had been sometimes his Schollar. Augustine ha­ving received from him a Poem or copie of accurate verses (but Augustinus ep. 39. ad Licenti­um Juvenem no­bilem & doctū Da Domino meo te qui tibi illud donarit ingeniū &c. Accepisti a Deo ingenium spiritualiter au­reum, & mini­stras inde [...]ibidi­ [...]ibus & in illo Satan [...] pro [...]i­n [...]s teipsum? Ornari abs te diabolus qua [...]it. perceiving that he abused his wit to wantonnesse or uselesse curio­sity) returns him answer to this effect. I have read this Poem, and I know not with what verses, or with what lamentation to mourne over it; because I see an excellent wit sparkling in eve­ry line, but such an one, as I cannot dedicate unto God. A little after he thus exhorts him, Give thy selfe unto my Lord, who hath given thee this excellent wit; If thou hadst found a golden Cup, what wouldst thou have done with it? Wouldst thou not have gi­ven it to some good publicke use? God hath given thee a golden wit, Thy understanding is a golden Cup, and wilt thou let thy lusts drinke out of it, or wilt thou drinke thy selfe to the devill in it? I tell thee thus much the devill would faine make thy wit his ornament, and thy parts, the oredit of his Court and Cause. Satan serves himselfe of the best wits, and his is the worst service of wit. Such shall be paid at last with crying. We fooles. Of all fooles the knowing; wise fooles, will be in the saddest condition: Observe thirdly,

The craftie are full of hopes, that their devises will succeed, and full of trouble, because they succeed not. Otherwise it could not be said, that God disappointeth the devises of the craftie; Disap­pointment implies expectation; And it is no afflicting affliction to misse of that, which we never looked for. These thought all sure. These doubted not to over-wit and over-power all, at last. This brought them somewhat beyond hope, even to the borders of assu­rance at least it so endeared them their hopes, that they would ra­ther hazzard their souls, than loose their plots, they were burthen'd to be delivered. Having conceived mischiefe, they were in travell with iniquity Psal. 7. 14. As the Lord suffers his own people to feare much, that when deliverance comes, their joy may be full: so, he suffers wicked men to hope much, that their sorrows may be full, when they cannot be delivered. A woman forgets the pains of her travell, for joy that a man childe is borne into the world; And these men shall remember the paines of their travell, for sor­row that a monster (such are their designes) is not borne into the world. That their mischiefe comes not (in their sense) to light, leaves them in desperate darknesse. Fourthly observe,

What such plot and devise, they labour to act and effect; Their hands cannot performe their enterprise; which intimates, that they put their hands to the worke, as well as their heads; as soone as they have layd their plot, they fall to acting. We should in this imitate our enemies, not to stand devising and consulting, this is a good way, and t'others a good way, and then doe neither; or then sit still and moulder away in expectation; love to, and zeale for Christ, and his truth, should render us as full of action, as of in­vention, of execution as of designe.

Fifthly, though they did attempt it with their hands, yet they could not effect it with their hands, Their hands did not performe their enterprise. Hence note, That

Craftie men may devise strongly, but they have not strength suf­ficient to accomplish their devices.

The Pharisees after all their confederacies against Christ were forc't (without any racke, but that of their owne consciences) to make this confession, Joh. 12. 19. Perceive ye how we prevail nothing. At this day, they have many fine devices and Idaeas ready framed in their heads, but the hand shakes, They cannot performe their enterprise. They want not counsell, nor craft, nor skill▪ nor will, nor desires, nor endeavours, only they want God with them. [Page 280] Hence it is, that though they gather very proper materials, and lay very strong foundations, yet they cannot reare up their building. And in the issue (Luk. 14. 29.) All that behold it shall mock, say­ing, These men began to build, and were not able to finish; It is the maine worke of God to stop evill men in their workes: what they would doe, he saith they shall not, and what they would not doe he saith they shall. Pharoah devised a devise against the chil­dren of Israel, but his hands could not performe his enterprise, Haman devised a devise against the Jewes, but his hands could not performe his enterprise. Achitophel gave craftie counsell against David, but his hands could not performe his enterprise. Herod the Fox plotted against Christ, to hinder the course of his Ministe­rie and Mediatourship, but he could not performe his enterprise; 'Tis so all along▪ therefore (Psal. 2. 1.) it is said, Why doe the Heathen imagine a vaine thing; a vaine thing, because a thing successelesse, their hands could not performe it, It was vaine, not only, because there was not true ground of reason, why they should imagine or doe such a thing, but vaine also, because they labou­red in vaine, they could not doe it. And therefore it followes, v. 4. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh, the Lord hath them in derision. The Lord sees what fooles they are, and men (yea themselves) shall see it. The Prophet gives us an elegant descrip­tion to this purpose (Isa. 59. 9.) They weave the spiders web, but their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their workes. As if he had said, they have beene devising and setting things in a goodly frame to catch flies, they have been spinning a fine thread, out of their braines, as the Spider doth out of her bowels, such is their web; but when they have this web, They cannot cut it out, or make it up into a garment. They shall go naked and cold, notwithstanding all their spinning and weaving, all their plotting and devising. The next broome that comes will sweepe away all their webs, and the Spiders too, except they creepe apace. God loves and delights to crosse worldly proverbs and worldly crase.

How many visible demonstrations have we of this in our times! How many cunning, but ruining devices, lie by the wals at this day unacted! They went through the Head-worke, but they could not get through their Hand-worke. We may say as in the Psalme (76. 5.) None of the men of might have found their hands: The men of craft sound their heads, but the men of might (bles­sed [Page 281] be God) have not yet found their hands, to execute up to the height of the divisers, either, wit or malice.

In this we see the glorious prerogative of God. How many thousand, thousand, thousand thoughts do men loose. The thoughts of many yeares are lost in a moment. God never lost, nor never shall loose one thought. And therefore David puts these two to­gether in a breath. Having said (Psal. 33. 10) The Lord bring­eth the counsell of the Heathen to nought, he maketh the devices of the people of none effect. In the next verse, he subjoynes, The counsell of the Lord standeth for ever, the thoughts of his heart to all Generations. And as the counsel of the Lord stands so he cau­seth the counsell of those to stand, who consult for him. He confir­meth the word of his servants, and performeth the counsell of his Messengers, Isa. 44. 26. So that their hands shall performe their enterprise, as the Lord encourageth the ancient people (Zac. 4. 9) The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house, his hands shall also finish it: And againe, Chap. 8. 13. Fear not, let your hands be strong. As if he had said, Feare not, goe on with your worke; For your hands shall performe their enterprise, you shall not beaten from your worke, neither shall ye work in vain. The Lord himselfe hath no barren counsels, and he makes all the counsels which are for him, bring forth in their due time, desired fruit, the longed for and beloved issue.

Lastly, observe; That

It is a great and wonderfull worke of God, to disappoint the devi­ces, and stop the enterprises of crafty men,

Eliphaz puts this among the wonders of God. This is reported in a way of admiration concerning God (Isa. 44. 25.) He frustra­teth the tokens of the liars and maketh diviners mad, he turneth wise men backwards, and maketh their knowledge foolish. The wisdome of God is most seen, in defeating the wise, as the power of God is most seene, in overthrowing the strong. While we consider that Theirs are secret devices, and that they are subtill devices, that they have many devices, and that they have many wayes to bring these devices to passe, it cannot fall below a wonder in our thoughts, that their thoughts, or devices are not accomplished. Therefore the Psalmist concludes (Psal. 124.) Ʋnlesse it had bin the Lord, who was on our side, &c. we had bin swallowed up quick and taken in their snare. As if he had said, if we should have had any lesse then God, to helpe us, we had been gone, all the world [Page 282] could not save us. To passe through a place full of gins and snares and pits set and made on purpose, to take a man, and that man not taken, is marvellous in our eyes. Thus it is with the people of God, they walk among snares and traps; The trade of most wicked men, is to be Trap-makers, Snare makers, if not Sword makers against the Saints of the most high. They meet with devices upon devices, and plots upon plots; now, that God shall disappoint all these, and exalt his people to safety in the very face of death and dan­gers, how admirable!

But some may object; Yet we see that, at least some of these plots are not disappointed, at least some of these devices take, and we have seen bloudy hands performing their enterprise.

I answer, in a word; First, this text and the observation bot­tom'd upon it, are to be understoood of what is often done, not strictly of what is alwaies done. The Lord very frequently disap­points the devices of the crafty.

But secondly, their very successe is a disappointment, and their prosperity is their curse. For their cause is under a curse, and so are their persons, when both seeme most succesfull. If outward judge­ments slay not wicked men, Their prosperitie shall, Pro. 1. 32.

Thirdly, all the successe, which the devices of wicked craftie ones have, tends to the fulfilling of Gods counsels, more then their own: So that, though it be to the eye, or in the letter, success to them, yet in truth, and upon the matter, it is success to the cause of God, Craft prevailes no further, & no longer on earth, then serves to accomplish the counsels of heaven, and fulfill what infinite wis­dom hath devised. Therefore when you see any devices of the craftie thrive, know, that God is serving himselfe upon them, and that they are but acting, What his hand and counsell hath determi­ned before to be done, Act. 4 28. As Christ himselfe overcame by dying, so doe they who are Christs, they have successe in all their disappointments; and these are disappointed in all their successes, and die while they overcome. No sinfull device of man ever did, or ever shall prevaile, beyond a contribution to the just and holy purpose of God. All their prevailings are disappointments, who intentionally oppose, though they really accomplish the good pleasure and purpose of God.

JOB Chap. 5. Vers. 13, 14, 15. 16.

He taketh the wise in their own craftines; and the counsell of the froward is carried headlong.

They meet with darknes in the day time; and grope in the noon day as in the night.

But he saveth the poor from the Sword, from their mouth, and from the hand of the mighty.

So the poore hath hope, and iniquity stoppeth her mouth.

IN these foure verses Eliphaz proceeds in, & finishes the former argument, by a further & fuller clearing of the power and wis­dome of God, in catching and over-matching crafty ones, in their wayes and counsels. Having shewed before (in the 12th verse) that their devices are disappointed, he sheweth now, that they are intangled in their devices. There, we say they could not performe their enterprises; and here we shall see them ruined in their enter­prises. It is a sore trouble to ungodly men, when they cannot doe the mischiefe; which they intend to others; but is a farr sorer trouble, when their counsels recoyle, and when their own projects promote their own ruine: when their own actions effect that, which they had rather die, then see done, when that mischiefe falleth upon their own heads, which they intended others; That's their calamity in this text.

He taketh the wise in their own craftines.

These wise men, are no better then the crafty, before mentioned, for we see their wisdome is but craftinesse. We had the Crafty in the former verse; and here we have their craft or craftines. The Apostle in 1 Cor. 3. 19. quotes this text of Eliphaz; The wisdom of this world is foolishnes with God; For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftines. The Greeke word there used hath [...], qua­si di [...]as, ad quod­libet opus prom­ptus, qui dexte­ritate ingenij valet ad quodli­bet agendum. somewhat more in it, then the Hebrew word, opened at the 12 v. For it notes a fitness for all purposes, a dexterity to serve any turn be it never so sinister or evill. Such a man can be on any side, and is for any purpose, you will turne him to. A godly man hath but one worke, and he can doe but one worke, that is, one worke in kind, Every worke he doth (as a godly man) hath a stampe of goodnesse, or godliesse, of holinesse, or justice upon it. But these [Page 284] crafty ones are for any worke, for various works, you may turn them loose to any service; they are ready to do good for a need, to serve their owne ends, and they will not sticke at any evill, for their owne ends. Their byas is not within them, but upon them, and they can clap it to which side they please, or may be most pleasing to, or taking with others; yet this Turn-coat Crastines shall not serve their turne; For saith the text, He taketh the wise in their own craftines.

The word which we translate [He taketh] is very sig­nificant. It imports a taking by force or strength, and it imports a taking by skill or stratagem. God will have them both wayes: If these cunning men worke by their wits, He can take them: The Lord hath more stratagems to take them, then they have had to take others: Or if they worke by po­wer and by plaine strength, he can take them. The Lord hath more strength to take them, then they have had to take o­thers. [...] C [...]pi [...], apprehen­dit de [...]o [...]o aut urbes expugna­vit in opinatu & violenta ex­pugnatione.

The word is applied to the taking in of Cities or Forts, places strengthned both by art and nature, and to the taking of them (which includes both sences) either by siege or sudden surprisall; Reade Numb. 21. 32. Josh. 6. 2▪ Deut. 2. 34. And so the sense may be that, although these men think, they have so intrenched & for­tified themselves by their wits, policies and counsells (as it were in a strong City or Castle) that they seem impregnable, and laugh at all opposite power: Yet, then God besieges, batters and takes them presently; he takes in, and sleights their works with ease, he levels to the ground their great thoughts, even the high Tower of their imaginations; That may be the force of the word [He ta­keth them.] For as every naturall man labours to secure himselfe and his insts, against the power of the word of God, by carnal rea­sonings and pleadings for them. All which the Apostles cals strong holds (2 Cor. 10. 4, 5.) The weapons of our warfare are not car­nall: but they are mighty thorough God to the casting downe of strong holds. Now (I say) as naturall men secure themselves (a [...] it were in strong-holds) by their carnall reasonings; so wic­ked Politicians thinke to secure themselves, and fortifie their de­signes by plots and platformes of craftie counsell. But as God in the ministery of his word, casteth downe all the arguments which a man frames in his heart, to protect his lusts. So the Lord in the administrations of his providence, throwes down all the fortifica­tions, [Page 285] which crafty men frame in their hearts, to protect their law-lesse practises, and takes them in

Secondly, The word may imply the taking & binding of a man in bonds or in fetters. He takes the wise in their own craftines, that is, he takes and binds them as with a chaine, or he fetters them in their own craftinesse, so the word is used (Prov. 5 22.) His own iniquities shall take the wicked himselfe, and he shall be holden with the cords of his sinnes.

Thirdly, The metaphor may be carried in an allusion to Hun­ters of wild beasts, or to bird takers; who set nets and gins, traps or toyles to take them: These wise, crafty men, are cunning hun­ters, their trade and businesse is, to set nets to catch, and toyles to intangle, they dig pits and lay snares for others to fall into; So the Prophet describes them (Jer. 5. 26.) They lay waite as he that setteth snares, they set a trap, they catch men: But at last, God takes the wise in their owne craftinesse, that is, the pits they have digged, and the snares they have layed, and the nets they have set shall catch themselves.

Fourthly, The word is applied in Scripture, to a taking, or a dis­covery by a lot; So (Josh. 7. 15.) The rule was thus given, He that shall be taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt; and vers. 18. Achan was taken, that is, taken by a lot, the lot disco­vered and catcht him. Achan had hid the Babylonish garment, and the wedge of gold safe enough, as he thought: and one would have thought, that in such a multitude, in such an huge host and throng of people, he might have been hidden too; but God sends a lot, and takes out Achan from the middest of all the multitude, he calls him out by name, this is the man. There may be a like meaning and use of the word in this place, He taketh the wise in their own craftines, that is, men who think to shelter themselves amongst the multitude, or to walke in the clouds of craft; men who hide and shadow themselves from the eye of the world, as if none should see who they are, or what they doe; even these God will take, he will direct a divine lot. one time or other to appre­hend and lay hold on them; he will discover Achans, the trou­blers of his Israel in their wicked counsels; and bring to light their stoln wedges of gold, and their Babylonish garments.

There is one thing further considerable, from the sense of that Greeke word, which the Apostle uses (1 Cor. 3. 19.) [...], Manu capio & firmiter teneo fugientem in cursu deprehen­dere [...]anu (que) injecta capere, quicquam ut n [...]n elebatur; unde [...] ma­nipulus pugil­lus, Erasm. He taketh the wise, &c The Apostles word signifies properly to take, or a [Page 286] taking with the hand, a laying hold upon one that is flying: As in a battell, when the enemy flies and runnes, the pursuer takes hold of him, and will not let him escape: And so the sense is, that though these crafty ones think to make an escape, when they have done mischiefe to out run the justice of men, yea, to get out of the reach of God, yet he taketh them, as flying enemies or malefa­ctors, that would make an escape; he catcheth them by the back, takes them by the shoulder, layes fast hold on them, so that they shall not be able to get away. He takes the wise in their owne craftinesse.

Lastly, It is observeable, that the Preposition [in] he takes them [in] their craftinesse, may be understood instrumentally; Pleros (que) astus illorum facit Deus instru­mentum ad ar­cendum ab ijs quod cogitant. Rab. Levi. and so it as much as the Preposition [by:] He takes them in, that is, he takes them by their devices; That preposition is often put instrumentally (Gen. 32. 10.) Jacob saith, In my staffe I passed over this Jordan; we translate, with my staffe, or, by my staffe I passed over this Jordan. And so Heb. 1. 1. God who at sundry times, spake in time past to the fathers [in] the Prophets, so the Greek; we translate by the Prophets, because they were the meanes or the instruments, which God employed to speak by. Thus here, He takes the wicked [in] their craftinesse; or [by] their craftinesse, their craftiness is the very meanes and instrument by which God apprehends and takes them. So much for the o­pening of the first clause. We may note hence, first, That

No wisdome or craftinesse of man, can stand before the wisdome and power of God. He not only takes them in their foolishnesse, but in their craftinesse; He stayes not, till they begin to dote and doe weakely, before he takes them; but when they are in their height of wit, and in the depths of worldly wisdome and policie, when they put forth the quintessence of craft, and give counsell like the Oracle of God (2 Sam. 16. 23.) then God takes them. He takes them in their craftinesse. (Pro. 21. 30.) There is no wisdome, nor understanding nor counsell against the Lord. No counsel against the Lord. How is it then said in the second Psalme, The Kings of the earth set themselves, and the Rulers take coun­sell together, against the Lord, and against his anointed? There are many counsells opposed against the Lord, but there are none pre­vailing against the Lord. The meaning of that holy Proverbe, is, That no wisdome, not the most sublime and refined wisdome; no counsell, not the most machivilian or Achitophelian counsell, can [Page 287] prevaile against the Lord. Men, usually catch others, when they are at a fault, or take them upon some advantage, and error in their counsels. Most successes of men, are made out of the slips and de­fects of their adversaries: They take, upon mistakes, either in ad­vising or acting; but after the most deliberate and grave debates, the choicest and best grounded resolves, the Lord takes them. For (1 Cor. 1. 25) The foolishnesse of God is wiser than man: And if the wisdom of man cannot match the foolishnesse of God, how shall it contend with the wisdome of God? As the Prophet Je­remiah speakes in another case, If I have runne with footmen and they have wearied me, how can I contend with horses? so if these men are not able to deale with the foolishnesse of God, how shall the, deale with his wisdom? Not, that there is any, the least imaginable foolishnesse in God, for as God is light, and in him there is no darknesse at all, so God is wisdome, and in him there is no foolish­nesse at all; but the holy Ghost speakes thus, to put God as low as the foolishest thoughts of man can put him, which is to think there is foolishnesse in God, yet in that, or then, he is wiser than they. Secondly observe;

That God turneth the counsels of wicked men against themselves: He taketh the wise, not only in, but by their craftinesse; He beates their own weapon against their heads; He wrests their weapons out of their hands, and with them wounds their hearts. Those counsels and contrivements, by which they thought to secure themselves are their destruction. He destroyes them in their coun­sels and by their counsels.

This wonderfully magnifies and commends the wisdome of Qui scipserunt de arte milita­ri, di unt sum­mum genus de­micandi, quo­ties calcato u [...]b [...]me adver­sarij, se in ho­stilem cly [...]eum e [...]ig [...]t m [...]les & [...]a contra stan [...]is vulne­rat te [...]ga. S [...]v. in V [...]rg. Aen. 1 [...]. God: He doth not trouble himselfe to devise some new way or stratagem to take these men, but he makes use only of that which they have devised. It is the noblest way of conquering, to conquer our enemy with his own weapon; such was that victory of Da­vid over Goliah: and that was a type of Christs victory over the Devill and all spirituall wickednesses. And such will his victory be over all the wickednesses of this world. The Lord is (and shall [...]ver be) known by the judgement which he executeth, the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands, Higgaion Selah Rem medit [...] ­dam sum [...]è, Jun. in loc., Marke and meditate, Psal. 9 16.

It was the plot of Satan, to tempt man, who was made in the image of God (for the doing of good and avoiding evill) to desire to be as God, knowing good and evill; he tempts man to affect a Ditty, [Page 288] or a God ship, and his plot was to ruine man below the beasts, by aspiring to an equality with God; or to make man less then he was made, by seeking to be, as much as his maker. Now the Lord takes (as it were) this weapon out of Satans hands, and destroyes him by it. Satan would have man aspire to be a God, that he might be ruined; and God becomes man to ruine Satan; This was the greatest counterplot that ever was. God took the Devill in and by his own craftinesse. As if God had said; Satan, thou shalt see what a fine device thou hast devised I will meete thee in thy owne way, and turne it upon thee. Thou wouldst have man become God, so to ruine him; now God shall become man, and by that I will at once ruine thy counsels, and repaire the broken condition of man.

Josephs brethren, had a device to hinder his prophecies, & make his dreames but phancies; Joseph dreamed that his brethren should worship him; they sell him for a captive into Egypt: what more opposite to honour among his brethren, then captivity among strangers? yet this device effected what they opposed; Joseph was exalted in Egypt, and his brethren press'd with want, worshipt or bowed unto him for bread.

The Jewes tooke counsell to kill Christ, and what was the mo­tive? A wise man among them suggests this feare; If we let him thus alone, the Romans will come and take away both our place and Nation (Joh. 11. 48.) But the Lord took the wise in this crafti­nesse; For that cruell act in killing Christ, brought the Romans upon them; The time cometh (saith Christ, he foresaw what would come) that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compasse thee round, and keepe thee in on every side, and they shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee, and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another, because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation, Luk. 19. 43. 44. And thus as the Psalmist (Psalme. 64. 8.) prophecied of his e­nemies, they made their owne tongues to fall upon themselves. A strange thing, that the fall of a mans tongue should oppress his body, and whole estate; yet so it is, the weight of a mans tongue falling upon him crushes him to powder. The seventh Psalme is the paraphrase of this point (ver. 14.) He travelleth with mis­chiefe. and hath brought forth a lye; (that answers the 12th verse, He disappointeth the devices of the crafty:) He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made; his mischiefe [Page 289] shall returne upon his own head, and his violent dealings shall come down upon his own pate: Here is the 13th verse made good, He taketh the wise in their own craftinesse.

How doth this aggravate the sorrows of crafty men? It is sad enough with the crafty, when they are taken by the craftinesse of other men; That any man out-wits them, is enough to put them out of their wits; How then will they live, being taken and en­snared b [...] their own wit, when they see themselves accessary to their own undoing; when they see they have pull'd down their estates with their own hands, and have put fire to their own houses? As it greatens the sin, so it greatens the punishment, when a man falls by his own hand; self-murder is the most sinfull and most bloody murder. Neither is their sin or punishment lesse, who die, by the craftinesse of their own heads, then theirs, who die by the violence of their own hands.

This is a visible truth among us, & he that runs may read it in the book of Gods later providences, I believe our age will be able to make as faire a record of this point for posterity, as any that hath passed, if not as all that have passed for many generations; my work not admitting long confirmations, I shall give but three instances, that by them this truth may be established.

First, The Prelates procured a stinted, and (in some passages) a corrupted Liturgy, to be sent unto, and imposed upon the Scotish Nation and that occasion'd the total suppression of their Prelacy in that Nation.

Secondly, The Prelates who were rooted fast enough in the Laws of the Land before, would make a Canon Oath, to settle themselves in the consciences of men to, that they being establisht both by Law and conscience, might be like Mount Sion which cannot be removed, but standeth fast for ever: yet that very Ca­non Oath, hath been turned upon themselves, and hath not only blasted their pompe, but batter'd down their power & hath pro­duced a Sacred Covenant-Oath, by which both Houses of Parlia­ment and the people of these three Kingdomes, are engaged for their extirpation.

Thirdly, That act of many of the Prelates protesting against the validity of any proceedings in Parliament, in that their ab­sence from the house, as being against Law; Gave occasion for a Law (which hath also pass'd the Royall assent) for their absence from that house (as members of it) for ever. O that men would ac­knowledge [Page 290] and praise the Lord in his wisdome, and in these won­derfull works, which he hath done among the children of men! He takes the wise in their own craftinesse, And, as it followes in the text;

The counsell of the froward is carried headlong.

The counsell.] There is somewhat further in that; not only are their devices disappointed, but their counsels; Counsels are the re­sults Consilium est a­li quid faciendi non faciendiveè excogitata ra tio, Cicer, l. [...]. de Invent. of serious and sad debates; Craft is of one, counsell of many heads laid together. Counsell is the extract of reason, both about what we are to doe, or leave undone: These counsels God carries headlong: There is nothing more opposite to counsel then precipi­tation, long deliberation should go before determination, but their counsels shall be carried head long: They shall either be overhasty in counsel, or their counsels being solemnly enough setled, shall be overhastily acted: Rash headlong execution may be as dangerous as rash headlong resolutions. But whose are these counsels? the same mens still, though under another notion. The counsel of the froward Before we had, the devices of the crafty; and again, the craftinesse of the wise; Now here, the counsell of the froward. The Spirit of [...] à r [...]u [...]c. [...] Et in niph [...] Niph [...], tor­tus, d [...]ortus, per Me [...]nyn. [...] luctatus fu [...]t, qui enim lacta [...]ur cum al [...] ­quo, eum varié torquet [...]one [...] eum vincat & prosternit. Notatur hic ta­lis vel versu­tia, qua quis facilè alium a­ [...]icumq▪ habium ind [...]i [...] ut nec facite cave ri, nec facile te­neri possi [...] in actionib [...]s suis; vel ad luctato­es alludi [...]ur, Goc. God varies words, but the men are the same. There is scarce va­riety enough of words in all languages, to expresse the variety of wick­ednesses, which one heart speakes. The Hebrew word in the roote, signifieth to wrest or to writh a thing, or to rest and turne a thing as wrastlers their bodies. Hence by a trope, it is translated often, to wrastle; because a cunning man in wrastling, turneth and windeth his body, and works himselfe in and out every way, to get an advantage of his adversary any way; therefore your cunning-headed men, your crafty men, are fitly presented under this word; they are like wrastlers, who turne, and wind them­selves in and out, and lye for all advantages; or, as we speak, they lye at catch. A man knowes not where to have them, or what they meane, when they speake plainest, or sweare solemnest: when we think we see their faces, we see but their visards, all their pro­mises and performances too, are under a disguise. Such cunning gamesters or wrestlers are here intended. One of the Patriarkes had this name (Gen. 30. 8) Napthali, and the reason is there given, for (saith his mother) with great wrastlings have I wra­stled with my sister, and I have prevailed, and she called his name Napthali: The Hebrew is, with wrastlings of God, that is divine [Page 291] and vehement wrastlings; As if she had said, I have used great and earnest endeavours, both with God in prayer, and all other meanes, as a wrastler by might and flight, to obtaine these bles­sings (given before to my sister) and now I have prevailed. And it [...] No [...]ne lite­ [...]s [...], g [...]minatis, u [...] insignis va­fricies, & qu [...] ­si duplica [...]a ca [...]dit [...]s signi­f [...]etur. Con [...]o [...]tupl [...]ca­tus. is observeable, that the Hebrews call an extraordinary cunning wrastler, Pethalthol, which is this word doubled in the latter syllable because he is a man of a double or extraordinary skill in wrastling, the word is doubled: and so it expresses one that is double witted, or that hath craft enough for two or three, though not honesty enough for one. And this word is applied to the Lord himself (Psal. 18. 26.) Ʋ [...]iur hoc ve [...]bo, ut indi­cetur maxima quaedam & in­victa Dei quasi distor [...]io, im­pl [...]atio & sa­cra caliditas adversus pra­vos, calidos, di­stortos, q. d. ad­versus Creten­sès cretiz at Deus, cum va­fro luctatore­vare luctatur Deus, supplan­tatores sup­planta [...]. with the froward thou wilt shew thy selfe froward: that is, If men will be winding and turning, and thinking to catch others, or over-reach the Lord himselfe, with tricks and turnings of wit, the Lord will meet and answer them in their own kind, he can turne as fast as they, he can put himselfe into such intricate labyrinths of infinite wisdome and sacred craft, as shall entangle and ensuare the most cunning wrast [...]er or tumbler of them all. He will Cretize the Cretians, supplant the suppla [...]t [...]rs of his people.

Some of the Greekes Olymprodorus vertit [...], homi­n [...]s varios, no­doso [...], im [...]lici­tos, intricatos. interpret this elegantly by a word in that language, noting a thing that hath many knots, folds or twists wreathes or plaits in it, as plaited haire, or a folded garment; thereby shadowing out men like a serpent, of knotted, twisted, en­folded spirits, men who wreath and plaite their actions so closely and artificially that few can understand or tell what to make of them, or where to find them: The counsels of these cunning, intri­cate, froward men,

Are carried headlong.] It is very observeable (Isa. 44. 25.) how the Prophet threatneth, that the counsels of the wise shall be turned backward; And here, their counsels shall be carried headlong, that is, froward. God hath wayes of all sorts to crosse ungodly poli­cies: he turns them sometime backward, and sometime forward, by both or either they are disappointed: Counsels, are turned back­ward, when the event is quite crosse to the designe, or the motion of things, to the resolutions of the mind: As if a man purposing to goe Eastward, should be turned about (he knowes not how) with his face into the West: Counsels are carried headlong, when Omne consilium a [...]ta um in se­ [...]na [...]one est stultitia. Rab. Sol. they go [...] too fast forward, and make so much haste on in their way, that they tire and are out of breath, or stumble and breake themselves before they can attaine their journies end.

The Originall word, signif [...]s to hasten, and thence to be preci­pitate, [...] a radi [...]e [...] Accel [...]rare, festinare, a [...]q in­de praecipitem esse, impruden tem, stultum; tam prudentia tranquil [...]a [...]e & delibera­tione gaudet. Eruto impetu­ruunt in su [...]m pestem. Coc. rash or foolish in counsell; Prudence uses to goe softly, wisdome keeps a kind of state in her pace, and loves to goe step by step, not headlong; A prudent man sets his head before his feet; his head goes before his feet in consultation, but he loves to goe up­on his feet, not upon his head, in action: It is the curse of the froward, their councels are carried headlong; when they should go steddily upon their feet, they run upon their heads or run their heads against the next wall; The meaning (in a word) is, They shall make more hast then good speed: or, they shall go so fast to their ends, that their end shall be their undoing: As the Lord (in mer­cy) makes the rash understand, so (in judgement) he makes the un­derstanding rash. As this is here threatned, so the former is gra­ciously promised, (Isa. 32. 4.) The heart of the rash shall under­stand knowledge, and the tongue of the stammerer shall speake plainly. When the Prophet would shew, how great a blessing God powres out upon his people by Christ, he thus expresses it: Christ, who is the wisdome of the Father, causeth the heart of the rash to understand knowledge; it is the word of the text, the heart of those who naturally run headlong upon businesses, who have no steadiness nor stableness in their understandings, shall be stay­ed and ballanced with wisdome and gravity from above. Christ will take them off their hurrying pace, and teach them to goe and doe, to advise and act with sobriety and deliberation. The letter clause of the promise, joints fitly with this, And the tongue of the Ʋt b [...]sit do l [...]g [...]ae accele­rationem habet cum fitan haesi­ [...]ia, ut nihil ex­perite pronun­ciare possit, & quo magis prope [...]at eo minus proficit, citata illa ling [...]a vo­tubilitate. Ita qui intelligen­tia festinus est. nullum profert util [...] & integrum consilium sed manca omnia & [...]. Bold. Bold. stammerer shall speake plainly; such as stammering is to speech, the same is rashnesse to counsell; A man that stammers huddles his words: he that hath an impediment in speech, speakes fastest, and because he cannot speake one word well, he speakes many words at once: This hast is his hinderance: in making so much hast to speak, he cannot speak at all; therefore we usually advise stam­merers, to take heed of speaking hastily, that they may speak plainly. The Prophet joynes these sweetly, to note the complete abilities of a Cstristian, The rash shall understand, & the stammerer shall speake plainly; that is he shall advise judiciously, and speake elegantly; depth of wisedome, and sweetnesse of elocution shall meet in him though before rude and rustick. But the counsels of the froward, though men of great parts, and filed speech, shall be crried headlong. Observe hence,

Hasty counsels are successelesse counsels. Hast in counselling [Page 293] alwaies makes waste, and so doth hastinesse in acting. Hast in ei­ther may hurt, as much as sloth, though usually we may divide the miscarriages that are in the world; between hastiness in coun­sell, and slownesse in action. I know not which is the greater pre­judice to an honest designe, to be quick in concluding, or to be dull in executing. They who will not take time to consult about what they a [...], may have time enough to repent of what they have done. And they who will not take the time for doing what they consult, loose all the time they took for consultation.

Note Secondly, That

God disappoints evill counsels, as by stopping them, so by putting them forward. The Princes of Zoan are become fooles (saith the Prophet) Why? The Lord hath a mingled a perverse spirit (or a headlong vertiginous [...]pirit) in the midst thereof, and they have caused Aegypt to erre in every worke thereof, as a drunken man staggereth in his vomit, Isa. 19. 13, 14.

Verse 14. They meet with darknes in the day time, and grope at noon day, as in the night.

Here is a further agravation of the misery upon crafty, froward Counsellours, They meete with darknes in the day time. Some un­derstand this for the darknesse of trouble, falling upon these men suddenly in the day of their prosperity; as if the holy Ghost had said, In the day time of their greatest glory, when they think their Sun at the height, then they are clouded and over cast, they meet with the darknes of sorrow, and are benighted in a moment, Amos 8▪ 9. I will cause the Sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the Earth in the clear day; (it is meant of great afflictions, as the next words interpret) And I will turn your feasts into mour­ning.

But rather by darknes in the day time, we are to understand the Diurnae tenebrae ignorationem denotant rerum clarissima [...]um. ignorance of those things which are very plain and clear. They meet with darknes in the day time, that is, they are puzled to find out and discover those things which are as cleare as the light. God often sends such a spirit of giddiness and blindness upon the coun­sels of his enemies; that easie things are hard, plaine things, ob­scure, and common questions very ridles to them.

[Page 294] They meet with darknes in the light.

There is a double light necessary to the seeing, or discovery of a thing. First, an externall light. And secondly, an internall light. External light is of the Medium or place, in which we see: the aire must be enlightned: Internall light is, of the Organ or instrument by which we see; the eye must be enlightned. Though there be much light in the aire, a blind eye sees nothing. So the meaning of these words may be explained [They meet with darknes in the day time] though these men have outward light, though the busi­nes they are about, be plaine, a clear case (as we speak) yet they are so darkned in their understandings, that they canot apprehend or make it out. The Idoll▪sheapheard is threatned with this woe, Zach. 11. 17. The Sword shall be upon his arme (his power shall be broken) and upon his right eye (his understanding shall be dark­ned) The Idol shepheard, shall be like an Idoll, having eyes, but seeing not; He was before a blind Seer, sinfully, and now he shall be a blind-Seer judicially. A [...] that wicked Priest, so these wicked Poli­ticians in the text, shall have a sword upon their right eye, a wound in the best of their understandings, which shall make them also blind-Seers, and make the light to be darknes round about them. The latter clause clears it farther.

They grope at noon-day, as in the night.

To grope at noon-day.] is the description of a blind-man. For what the eye is to a man that sees, the same is the hand to a man Palpare in me­rid [...]e est caeci periphrasis▪ Cae­cus tentat & palpat manibus antequam pe­dem effe [...]t. Praebent manus [...]aecis [...]ulorum usus & ministe­ [...]ia, Sanct. in ca. [...]9. that cannot see. A man that sees, looks his way, but a blind man feeles it, his hand is in stead of an eye to direct his way. They as it is said in the text, Grope at noon-day, as in the night. When the Sodomites were smitten with blindnesse, They wearied themselves to find the door of Lots house, Gen. 19. 11. And when the Phili­stines had put out Sampsons eyes, and he was brought to make them musick at their feast, he said to the lad that held him by the hand. Suffer me that I may feel the pillars whereupon the house standeth, &c. he could not see them, but he could grope or feel them out Groping infers either want of light or want of sight These in the text, had light enough, therefore the failing was in their eys, They grope at noon-day. This fearfull judgement the Lord threat­ens against his own people, Deut. 28▪ 29. Thou shalt grope at noon-day, as the blind gropeth in darknes. And it was brought upon them, [Page 295] as themselves lamentably complaine, Isa. 59 10. We grope for the wall like blind-men, and we grope, as if we had no eyes, we stumble at noon-day, as in the night,

In that as it is here added as a further aggravation of the judg­ment of God upon these, who thought themselves Eagle-eyed, all eye, and all the world blind, That they shall meet with darknes in the day time. We may observe; first,

It is a sore judgement not to see when there is light. It is like star­ving at a full Table, or perishing with thirst, in the midst of a fountaine. It is a great judgement not to have light to see by, but it is a greater judgement, not to see by the light. It is a great judg­ment to a people, when they have not the light of the Gospel; when Christ who is the light, is not shiningly preached among them; but if light shine, if Christ be preached, and a people see it not, This is a farre greater judgement. The poore Gentiles before the light of the Gospell came to them, sate in darknes, and in the shadow of death; and in that estate, they could only (like blind men) grope after God, as the Apostle elegantly expresses it Act. 17. 27. He hath made of one bloud all Nations of men, &c. that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him and find him. The Gentiles were inexcusable, if they did not find the Lord by Feeling after him in the darke: What then are they, who find him not by seeing in the light? The Apostle shewes us them as lost men, and blinded by Satan, to whom the light of the glorious Gospel doth not shine, when it shines (2 Cor. 4, 3, 4.) To grope in Gospel-light, to be in darknesse, when truth is at her high-noon, is, as the sha­dow of death. It is the worst of sins to sin against the light, and it is the worst of judgements, not to see the light; by which we may avoid sinne. The heat of divine wrath breaks out in this, when abused light is hunished with want of sight, or when light is sent, and eyes taken away, (Isa. 6. 9, 10.) When the Prophet brought killing light to the Jews, he saith, See ye indeed; but perceive not, that is, because ye have had light, and would not see beleevingly; Now ye shall have light, which ye shall not see, perceivingly, or distinctly: as the man in the Gospell saw, but he did not perceive, when he saw men walking as trees, he had not a distinguishing eye, or a discerning sence, as the Apostle speaks, Heb. 5. 14. But why shall they not perceive, when they see? The Prophet tels us, be­cause the Lord had said, Shut their eyes least they see. The work of a Prophet is to open eys, but when men wilfuly shut their eys, then

God shuts them judicially, and blinds them with light. The A­postle quoting this text, Acts 28. 27, expounds it so, Their eyes, have they closed, least they should see; for this, God closed them that they could not see. Paul was preaching, and he preached Christ the true light, The Sun of righteousnesse: Behold the mi­sery spoken of in this text, They met with darknes in the day time. This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men love darknes rather than light. Why love they darknesse? Because they see not the light: And because they see not the light, there­fore they cannot love it. It is impossible to see the light, the beau­tifull face of the truth, as it is revealed in Christ, and not to love it. A Heathen said, if vertue (much more if Gospell truth) were seen, every eye would be taken, and every heart led captive by it. A great part of the world hath not this light to see, and the greatest part of those, who have this light, see it not. They must needs meet with darknesse, who are darknesse, in the day-time. And they must grope at noon day, as in the night, who are night. If men heare the law and the testimony, and neither speake nor doe according to that word, it is (as the Prophet gives the rea­son) because there is no light in them; or as the Hebrew, No Morning in them, Isa. 8. 20. Till the day starr arises in our hearts, the day before our eyes, is night.

Secondly, observe,

Plain things are often obscure to the wisest, and most knowing men.

They grope at noon day, as in the night.] That which a man may see with halfe an eye (as we say) these men, who thinke themselves All eye, cannot see. Men of acute and sagacious un­derstandings, men quick-sighted like Eagles, prove as dull as Bee­tles. Owles and Bats see in the darke, better then in the light; And (in a sense) it is true of these, they can see about the works of darknesse, but the light of holinesse and justice, they cannot see. The reason is given in that of Christ, The light that is in them is darknesse, no wonder then, if the light without them be darknes; if the inward light, the light that i [...] in them be darknesse, how great is that darknesse; so great that it quite darkens the outward light. Inward darkness is to outward light, as a great outward light is to a small one (in regard of our use or benefit) it extinguishes and overcomes it. Hence these men cannot see, the plainest object, in the clearest light. Light shineth in darknes, and the darknes compre­hendeth it not, Joh. 1. 5.

Christ breaks forth into a vehement gratulation to his Father, (Mat. 11. 25.) I thanke thee O Father, Lord of heaven nnd earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. The wise and prudent could not see, so much as children. They were so wise in their own conceits, that they could not conceive the things of God. As it is in spiritu­als, so likewise, in regard of civill counsels. God hides wisedome from the wise, and understanding from the prudent. They shall not be able to doe or see, what a child might have done or seen, they shall doe such things, and so absurdly, that a child would not do them. Mysteries are plain▪ when the Lord opens, and plainest things are mysterious, when he shuts the eyes of our understan­ding.

Thus farre Eliphaz hath set forth the power and justice of God against subtill, crafty counsellours. Now he shews the opposite ef­fect of his power and goodnesse.

Vers. 15. But he saveth the poore from the Sword, from their mouth and from the hand of the mighty.

But he saveth the poor.] It is very observeable in Scripture, that usually, if not alwayes after the mention of judgement and wrath upon the wicked, the mercy, goodnesse and love of God unto his own people are represented, least any should thinke, that judge­ment is a worke wherein God delighteth, he quickly passeth from it, and concludes in what he delighteth, Mercy. As he retains not his anger for ever towards his own people, so he stay [...]s not long upon the description of his anger against his enemies, because he de­lighteth in mercy, Mich. 7. 18 A subject of mercy is most pleasant both to the hand and pen of the Lord. He wishes rather to write in hony than in gall, and to draw golden lines of love, then bloudy lines of wrath. Satan is a Destroyer, and he doth nothing but destroy, and pull down. The Lord destroyeth and he pulleth down, he defeats and disappointeth, but he hath another worke besides, he saves and delivers, he builds up and revives the hopes of his people.

He saveth the poore.] These poore, are Gods poore; Some may be called the Devils poore, for they have done his worke, and he hath given them poverty for their wages. Satan will give all his hirelings full pay when they die, The wages of sin is death; while they live, many of them receive only the earnest of it, pover­ty and trouble. All that are poore, stand not under the rich in­fluences [Page 298] of this promise, He saveth the poore. Wicked poore are no more under Gods protection, then wicked oppressou [...]s or wic­ked rich men are. This poore man cryed, and the Lord heard. Ps. 34. 6. Not every or any poore man. Some poor men may cry, and the Lord heare them no more, then he did the cry of Dives, the rich man in hell, Luk. 16. Forget not the Congregation of thy poore, Psal. 74. 19 Thy poore, by way of discrimination: There may be a greater distance between poore and poore, then there is between poore and rich. There are many ragged regiments, Con­gregations of poore, whom the Lord will forget for ever. But his poore shall be saved. And these poore are of two sorts; either poore in regard of wealth and outward substance; or poor in regard of friends or outward assistance. A rich man especially a godly rich man, may be in a poore case, destitute and forsaken wanting pa­tronage and protection: God saveth his poore in both notions, both those that have no friends, and those that have no estates.

The Hebrew word for Poor, springs from a root signifying de­sire; [...] a radi [...]e [...], quod est deside­rare, quasi pau­per omnia de [...]ideret, cum nihil habeat, inde E­bion haer [...]ti [...]us, quasi mentis, & inteligentiae inops, Schiud. Quia omnibus indiget omnia cupit & g [...]ata habe [...]. Rab. Da. and the reason is, because poore men are commonly rich in desires. They that are full of sensible wants, are full of earnest wish­ings. They that are empti [...]st of enjoyments are fullest of hopes and longings. And the reason why poverty of spirit, in our spirituall estate, is pronounced a blessing, is, because the poore in spirit are full of desires after spirituall riches. They are ever craving and see­king to be filled with that fulnesse, which is in Christ, with grace for grace; they would have every image of every grace in Christ en­graven upon their souls. Or (in a holy covetuousnesse) they would be as rich in grace as Christ is. Grace for grace: as a covetous man, would have penny for penny, pound for pound with his richest neighbour; or as an ambitious man would have honour for honour, title for title with his greatest neighbour. That Christian who sees his estate lowest, usually set, his desires highest, his affections are ever upon the wing, for supplies from Christ. Both the civill poor man, and the spirituall poor soul, would fain be enriched.

He saveth the poor from the Sword, from their mouth, and from the hand of the mighty.

Some reade this by apposition, he saveth the poore from the Sword, their mouth, making the latter to be but an exposition of the former, From the Sword, their mouth, that is, their mouth is the Sword, from which God saveth his poore. So taken it is a truth [Page 299] for the mouth is a sharpe Sword, as killing as any instrument or engine of warre. Hence others who keepe this sence, reade it thus, A gladio or [...] [...] ­orum. Vulg. Ab o [...]isione o­ris eorum Chas. Ʋt [...] genn [...]ivum. [...] G [...]ad [...] oris est ipsa lingua mala. i. e. calumnia falsa, qu [...] homo tan­quam g [...]adio ne [...]a [...]ur. Sed me [...]ius a gladio qui [...]x ore ipso­ [...]um, i. e. a fal­sis Testimoniis Drus. He saveth the poore from the Sword of their mouth, or from the killing stroake of their mouth; making the particle Mem, in the O­riginall, to governe the genitive case, The Sword of their mouth, or the Sword comming out of the mouth. There are two Swords of the mouth, two comming out of the mouth, or one double edged. 1. Slander. 2. False-witnesse, by which often the reputation and sometime the person of a man is murthered,

But I conceive that the clearest meaning of the Originall (though both are good) is, to reade these as distinct evils from which, He saveth the poore, namely, 1. From the Sword. And 2 From their mouth. 3. From the hand of the mighty. That is, From Nimrods, mighty hunters, oppressours of the poore; or from the violent man. I returned (saith the Preacher, Eccles. 4. 1.) and considered all the oppressions that are done under the Sunne, and behold the teares of such as were oppressed, and they had no comfor­ter and one the side of their oppressours there was power, but they had no comforter. Oppressours are alwaies cloathed with power, and the oppressed seldome find so much pity, from men, as to be their comforters, Therefore for the oppression of the poore, and the cry of the needy, the Lord arises, and he saves his poor.

  • From the
    • slaying Sword.
    • slandering tongue.
    • oppressing hand.

These three wayes crafty, powerfull men seeke to destroy the poore. First, by the Sword to cut off their lives. Secondly, by slander to blemish and blot out their good names. Thirdly, by strong hand, to captivate their persons or oppresse their estates and liberties. To be saved from all these destructions is compleate sal­vation. Let the wicked attempt as many wayes as they will or can, to destroy, the Lord both will and can find out as many wayes to save. The malice of man shall never out act or over-match the mercy of God. He saveth the poore from the sword, &c.

I should here more distinctly open these great evils, The Sword, The mouth, and the hand of the mighty, with the goodnesse of God in saving his poore from them; But these particulars occurre againe, v. 20, 21. Where you may find a more distinct explication of them. From these words thus farre opened. Observe,

First, to what all the devices and crafty counsels of ungodly Po­liticians [Page 300] tend. Here we have the issue or English of their counsels, the meaning of their State mysteries is interpreted, Oppression. Their craft concludes in cruelty, and their witty devices, in drawn Swords, slandering tongues, or the hands of violence. We may say of them, as Jacob of his sonnes Simeon and Levi, Gen. 49. 5, 6. In­struments of cruelty are in their habitations. O my soule come not thou in their secret, for in their anger they will slay men, and in their selfe will digge down a wall.

Secondly, observe their method. First, here is the bloudy Sword, they will cut them off, and rid their hands of them, if they can: They could wish (as that bloudy Roman Emperor) that the heads of their smpposed enemies (possibly their best friends) were set up­on one shoulder, and that they might cut them all off at one blow. But if God save his poore from the mouth of the Sword; then, the next weapon is the Sword of their mouths▪ Slanders and defama­tions, lyes and false accusations shall reach them, whom, iron and steele, pike and shot cannot. The tongue is a little member, but it is a world of iniquity, and beasteth (often acteth) great things, Jam. 3. 5, 6.

But if God saves his poore from both mouth and Sword, so that their enemies cannot prevaile at sharpes. Then they try at blunts, by a heavy hand, to over-loade, oppresse and keepe them down, in their estates, liberties and priviledges.

Observe thirdly; That

Salvation is of the Lord.

The faith of David grasped this, as his richest treasure, Psal 68. 20. He that is our God, he is the God of salvation; The Lord is called, the God of salvation, as the God of comfort, both affirma­tively and negatively. Salvation is to be had in him, and there is no salvation to be had without him. Truly in vaine is salvation ho­ped for from the hils, and from the multitude of mountains (from Armies, or from counsels; from the power and polices of men) In the Lord our God is the salvation of Israel, Jer. 3. 23.

Fourthly, it is observeable against whom these crafty, cruell men muster up and levie the united forces of sword, tongue and hand, They are the poore. He saveth the poore. Why, will not God save the rich, will he not save the mighty, the Princes of the earth? Yes God will save all that feare him, both high and low, rich and poore. Why then is it said, He saveth the poore? As it were, determining Salvation upon them. The reason is, because [Page 301] as the poore are most easily opprest▪ so usually they are most op­prest: where the hedge is lowest, men goe over fastest. And be­cause, for the most part, Gods people are poore, comparatively to others they are the vallies the lower parts of the earth; and wicked­nesse is commonly advanced upon the mountaines of wealth ho­nour and greatnesse; therefore the denomination is taken from them; He saveth the poore. They whom God loves most, the world loves least, and they have least of the world. The world gives most to its own; And God hath given his own so much be­yond the world, that, the losse of a world, is not discerned in their estate, and worldly gaines are not often discerneable in their estates; therefore, though in Christ, they are heires of all things, and all is theirs, yet their ranke and titles are among the poore.

Fifthly observe: They are poore ones, yet what devising and plotting is here against them? Crafty counsels, drawne swords, envenom'd tongues, strong hands lifted up: Against whom are all these? Against the poore: Note thence, That

Wicked men plot against the people of God, how poore and low soever they be.

As David said unto Saul (1 Sam. 24. 14.) After whom is the Facis quod est tanto rege in­dignum, dum me tenuissimum tanto comi [...]atu persequeris, Jun. in loc. King of Israel come out? after a dead dog; after a flea? As if he had said, whom dost thou pursue? thou doest that, which is unwor­thy and much below so great a King; wilt thou set thy strength against my weaknesse? Why dost thou arme against him, by whose conquest thou canst get no honour? Alas, I am but a poore man, a meane subject, no match for thee; I wonder you trouble your selfe so much in following or opposing me? I am (in com­parison) but as a dead-dog, or as a flea. A dead dog cannot bite, or if I bite, it is but a flea-bite; A dead dog can doe no hurt, and a living flea can doe but little. The people of God (as such) never have any will to doe wrong, and it is seldome that they have any power to doe wrong, and yet the world is all up in pursuit against them; What's the reason of it? what's the matter? The truth is, how poore and low soever they are, yet there is an eye of jealousie awake upon them: The world looks upon them as a suspected par­ty, the world hath secret misgivings, that one time or other, they must rise upon their ruines; and therefore they will keepe them downe (yes that they will) as long as they can. What a distance was there between Haman and Mordecai? the one sate in the [Page 302] gate, and the other stood at the Kings elbow, and had his eare, yea and his signet (upon the matter) at his command: yet this Ha­man must needs oppresse Mordecai, because he would not bow: Ha­man had a jealous eye upon him, he was a suspected person; Though he could not reach Haman yet Haman fear'd he might un­dermine him.

Againe there is a continuall Antipathy between the two seeds; and Antipathy is incureable; To oppose the godly, is not so much the disease, as the nature of wicked men: And we know, antipa­thies are against the whole kind, revenge against this, or that indi­viduall is no ease to it; Antipathy is not spent, but in the con­sumption of the whole kind. It is not this or that sheepe which the wolfe hates, but every sheepe, fat or leane, shorn or unshorne, that's all one to the wolfe; he will suck the blood of a sheepe that hath not a l [...]ck of wool upon his back, as greedily as if that sheepe had a golden fleece. Let a godly man be poore or rich▪ low or high, their sword shall be unsheath'd, and their mouth open'd a­gainst him; the old hatred and quarrell is against all. Haman thought scorne to lay hands on Mordecay alone, wherefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jewes, Hest 3. 6. He hated those whom he never saw, those who had never wrong'd him, haply had bowed un­to him; yet, because Jewes, dye they must.

Sixthly observe (But he saveth the poore) God delights to help the poore. He loves to take part with the best, though the weakest side. Contrary to the course of most, who when a contro­versie arises, use to stand in a kind of indifferency or neutrality. till they see which part is strongest, not which is justest. Now if there be any consideration (besides the cause) that draws or enga­ges God, it is the weaknesse of the side. He joynes with many, be­cause they are weake, not with any, because they are strong; there­fore Psa. 10. 14. 18 Hos. 14. 3. he is called, the helper of the friendlesse, and with him the fatherlesse (the orphans) finde mercy; By fatherlesse, we are not to understand such only whose parents are dead, but any one that i [...] in distresse; as Christ promiseth his Disciples, Joh. 14. 18. I will not leave you orphans, that is, helplesse, and (as we trans­late) comfortlesse, though ye are as children without a father, yet I will be a father to you. Men are often like those clouds, which dissolve into the sea, they send presents to the rich, and assist the strong; but God sends his raine upon the dry land, and lends his strength to those who are weake. This poore man cryed, and the Psal. 34 6. [Page 303] Lord heard him, and saved him out of all his troubles. Forget not the Congregation of thy poore for ever: The truth is, he never Psal. 7. 4. 19. firgets them. They are graven upon the palmes of his hands, such poore are his treasure, his Jewels, as the signet upon his right hand; Therefore alwayes in his eye, yea alwayes in his heart, though they lye in the dirt, or be trodden under foot like mire in the streets. The Prophet makes this report to God of himselfe (Isa. 25. 4.) Thou hast been a strength to the poore, a strength to the needy in his distresse, a refuge from the storme, &c.

Thus farre Eliphaz hath given instance of the great, marvellous and unsearchable works of God, in a double reference: First, to wicked crafty oppressors; Secondly, to poore helplesse innocents; He shuts up this narration with a double effect of these works upon those two sorts of men. First, shewing what effect they produce in the poore▪ namely hope: Secondly, what in the wicked, namely, shame and confusion of face,

Vers. 16. So the poore hath hope, and iniquity stoppeth her mouth.

Here is the conclusion or result of all, the Epiphonema or exul­ting close, in which Eliphaz perfects the story of those admirable works of judgement and of mercy; So the poore hath hope, &c.

This Originall word for [poore] varies from the former, though a radice [...] Exhaustus, de humo repropriè, per metaphorū de vi [...]ibus cor­poris & opi­bus attenua­tus, tenuis for­tunae homo. the persons and their estate be the same: That word noted them full of desire, and this (which is the cause of it) empty of comforts: Properly it signifies one, that is exhausted or drawn dry; Poore persons are exhausted persons, exhausted of their strength, exhau­sted of their estates, exhausted of friends and credit in the world. It is a metaphor taken from rivers, ponds or pooles, that are drawn dry, when we would take the fish, or take away the de­fence which they give to forts or Cities. Isa. 19. 6. And they shall turne the rivers farre away, and the Brookes of defence shall be empti­ed and dried up: which also enlightens that text, Isa. 33. 21. Where the righteous Lord will be unto us a place of broad rivers. A river that shall not be drawn dry or sluced out (as Euphra­tes was by Cyrus when he took Babylon) but shall sill its bankes and shoares perpetually; that is, the Lord will be there a perpetual defence: A river that shall never be impoverish'd, but shall keep a full stock and treasure of streames and waters.

Dalilah had her name from this root, and it carries an elegant [Page 304] allusion to the qualities of all Dalilahs, or insinuating lascivious women, they drayne the strength, exhaust the purses, dry up the credit, wast the All, of the mightiest Sampsons, whose hearts are entangled by their flatteries, or ensnared by their beauties

The poore have hope.] The word hath been opened at the 6th verse of this Chapter, to note strong and earnest expectation; The poore man observing the wonders, which God doth in the world, cannot be out of hope, though he be out of possession; And though his own strength be gone, yet he lives upon the strength of Christ; he hopes strongly (that's the force of the word) when he feeles no strength. When I am weake (saith the Apostle Paul, 2 Cor. 12. 10.) then am I strong, that is, I am strongest (through hope) in Christ, when I am weakest through sense in my selfe.

More distinctly, this hope may be taken two wayes.

  • 1. For the object or thing hoped for.
  • 2. For the act or grace of hope.

In the former notion of hope, the sense runnes thus; God having taken the wise in their own craftinesse, and disappointed the device of the crafty, having delivered the poore from the sword, from their mouth, and from the hand of the mighty, now the poor hath the thing he looked for, the thing he prayed for, the thing for which he hath been seeking and waiting upon God: So the poore hath hope, that is, he hath the mercy, he expected, salvation from the sword, &c. he is made partaker of his hope, by those glorious ad­ministrations of the justice and mercy of God. Hence observe; First,

Gods poore, hope for good in the worst times. When deliverance comes, these poore have but that which they looked for; they looked for light, when they were in the darkest condition. When they were exhausted, they knew God was not exhausted; and when they were drawn dry, they knew the Lord was not; though their treasure was spent, yet they were assured the treasury of Heaven was full: When strength is gone, and money is gone, and friends are gone, yet God is not gone; and therefore they know the good may come, which they hope for. Turne ye to the strong holds ye priseners of hope, saith the Prophet, Zech. 9. 12. The peo­ple of God (though prisoners) are yet prisoners of hope, that is, they have hope of deliverance and enlargement, in their greatest streights: The power of God is never imprison'd, and while his people can make this out, their spirits are not. Secondly observe; [Page 305] It is no vain thing to hope in God.

The poore hath his hope. The Prophet brings in the Jewes thus trumphing in God, (Isa. 25. 9.) And it shall be said in that day? What day was that? The former verse points it out, A day where­in death shall be swallowed up in victory, wherein teares shall be wiped away from off all faces, &c. And in that day the people of God shall thus boast of God, and (as it were shewing him to the world) shall say, Loe, this is our God, we have waited for him, and he will save us: This is the Lord, we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoyce in his salvation; vaine hopes fill our face, with shame; but hopes fulfilled, fill our hearts with rejoy­cing. The poore hath his hope; he can shew his hope, 'tis visible: As Hannah, when she came to present her Son unto Eli, For this child I prayed, as if she should say, Sir, here is my prayer, you could not heare my prayer, when I was in the Temple, you thought I was drunken, but now you may see my prayer, here it is, for this child I prayed, and the Lord hath given me my petition which I as [...]ed of him, 1 Sam. 1. 27. So the soule saith; In such a time of trouble, personall or nationall, I was praying and seeking God, I was beleeving and hoping, men knew not, understood not the workings of my soule, toward Christ, yet now they may see them, here is the thing I prayed for, here is that I hoped for; So (first) the poore hath hope.

Secondly, The poore hath hope, that is, the grace of hope, or the gracious actings of hope; and taking it so, the sense rises thus: So (that is) God having done such great things, in disappoint­ing the devices of the crafty, and in saving his poore, by this meanes, the poore come to have hope, the grace of hope strengthned and con­firmed in them. Hence observe, That

The experience we have of Gods power and mercy, in saving us out of former troubles, breeds and nourishes hope, against future times of trouble.

So the poore hath hope. Though the poore man was in a hope­lesse condition before, yet now seeing the works of God, he hath hope laid up for ever. Psal 64. 9, 10. All men shall feare and declare the workes of God, for they shall wisely consider of this thing: And what followes? The righteous shall be glad in the Lord, and trust in him; that is, if they have fail'd in their trust h [...]etofore, and not given God honour by confiding in him, yet these wonderfull works of God (of which he speakes in that [Page 306] Psalme) worke this hope. Rom. 5. 4. Tribulation worketh pa­tience, and patience experience, and experience hope. Graces have a generation one from another, though all have but one ge­neration from Christ at once. We have here the genealogy of hope in three descents. Experience is the next, or immediate parent of hope. So the poore hath hope. Thus it is begotten. 2 Cor. 1. 10. God who hath delivered us from so great a death, and doth deliver, in him we trust, that he will yet deliver us. An armed daring Go­liah, should be looked upon as vanquisht already, when we can but remember a vanquisht Lion and a Beare.

Againe, The poore hath hope: He doth not say, God having thus destroyed the ungodly, and saved his own people from the sword, &c. now they have liberty, now they have peace, now they have aboundance of riches and prosperity; but he makes this the issue, now they have hope: Whence note, That

Hope is a greater and better possession unto the people of God here, than all the great and good things which they possesse.

Put as much into their hands us you can, there is more than that put in their hearts by hope. The poore hath hope: he lookes over all his possessions, and pitcheth upon expectation as his portion. The estate which a beleever hath in the promises, is more than the estate he hath in possession: Riches in the promise, is better than riches in the chest. And so the deliverances and protections which are laid up for the Saints in promises, are more than all the de­liverances and protections received and enjoyed: There is no en­joyment but that in Heaven (where we shall enjoy all that ever was promised) so good as hope, for what is promised. Alexander an Heathen, had such a notion about an earthly hope, which had no ground neither, but the great things his own ambition promised him, for when one seeing him give away all his present inheritan­ces, Persp [...]ctâ hac Dei providen­tia erga pau­peres & humi­les, maligni & nocendi studiosi retrahent sese, ne (que) inter se amplias ineant prava & ini­qua adversus pios consilia Aquin. said, what Sir, will you make your selfe a beggar, no (saith he) I will reserve hope for my selfe.

And iniquity stoppeth her mouth.

Here is the opposite effect, iniquity; the abstract is put for the concrete. iniquity, for men of iniquity, wicked men, these stop their mouthes. And it is observeable, that as before God made them active in their own destruction, so here he makes them active in their own silence; he saith not, God stoppeth their mouthes, but they stop their own mouthes; that is, the wicked seeing those won­derfull [Page 307] works of God, have not a word to say, nor a counsell to give more against the godly; they are as mute as fishes, as dumbe as dogs, they know not how to slander, or of whom to complaine, and therefore they suspend, and enjoyne silence upon themselves. As that word of Christ, Friend how camest thou in hither, not ha­ving on a wedding garment? (Mat. 22. 12.) so these works of Christ shall make his enemies speechlesse, Iniquity stoppeth her mouth,

This stopping their mouthes, is caused two wayes; First, from shame; A man is sometime silent, because he is asham'd to speake: disappointments (especially such as theirs before noted) produce shame naturally, and shame makes silent. A man that blushes much, speakes little, and he that dayes not lift up his head, will not be for­ward to lift up his voice. Mich. 7. 16. I will shew marvellous things (saith the Lord, and what then?) The Nations shall see and be con­founded, they shall lay their hand upon their mouth, their eares shall be deafe: They shall see it, and be confounded, that is, they shall be greatly ashamed; confusion of face is but shame heightned, and the Holy Ghost puts shame and confusion of face together in divers places. Now this great shame layes their hands upon their mouthes, and puts their fingers in their eares; they are resolvedly both dumb and deafe, at the sight of those marvellous things.

Secondly, Admiration and amazement silence them: The works of God being marvellous, they shall stand admiring and wondring at them, till they cannot speake. Reade the like, Isa. 52. 15. and Psal. 107. 42. where, when the Prophet had reckoned up many wonderfull works of God, he concludes as in the Text, ver. 42. He setteth the poore on high, &c. the righteous shall see it and rejoyce and all iniquity shall stop her mouth; while the Lord seemes to doe nothing, or to doe but little, iniquity will doe nothing, but talke, or it talkes very much, it is very talkative; but if once God begin work­ing, iniquity has done speaking, you shall heare no more of them, till the next successe on their side. Then observe, First,

Wicked men will never cease slandering and censuring, brag­ging and boasting, till some eminent judgement stops their mouthes. So iniquity stoppeth her mouth, they will never stop their mouthes before: Isa. 26. 11. Lord, when thy hand is lifted up, they will not see, but they shall see, and be ashamed for the envy at thy people; I will make the judgement bigger and greater; write my wrath in fairer, or rather in bloodier characters, that they may see them: As [Page 308] small judgements will not open the eyes of wicked men, so small judgments wil not stop their mouths, but when God begins to work wonders, they are dumb, they have done. Secondly observe, That

God will doe such things for his people, as shall put the crafty to si­lence. The Saints ought to live so holily, that by well doing they may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men, 1 Pet. 2. 15. The Lord will do so justly and gloriously, as shall put to silence the malice of the wisest men: These two, the holinesse of the Saints, and the Ju­stice of God, are stopples in the mouthes, or the stop-mouthes of un­godly men. As they by unrighteous acts have stopped other mens mouthes, and silenced them, so God by terrible things in righteous­nesse, will stop their mouthes, and silence them for ever: They shall have nothing to say at last, either against the justice of God, or a gainst the innocency of his people; against both these their mouthes chiefly open. They impute and fasten unrighteousnesse on God: you talk of God, and boast of his promises, where is he? where are they? The Prophet brings them in, belching out such blasphemies (Isa. 5. 19.) They say, let him make speed and hasten his work that we may see it; and let the councell of the holy One of Israel, draw nigh and come that we may know it. Words filled with as high a sense of spirituall wickednesse, as wit and malice can infuse. They jeere the patience of God, as slacknesse, and as if Justice it selfe were tired, or too slow pac'd, they spurre it on, to ruine themselves. You have often told us of the Holy One of Israel, and what he would doe, but threatned men live long, we see. You are nim­bler of your tongues, then your Holy One of Israel is of his hands: Therefore let him make speed (if he can) and hasten his work that we may see it.

Will not the jealousie of the Lord awake, at the noise of this hel­lish blasphemy? will he not stop the mouth of this iniquity? sure­ly he will: And the Prophet assures us he will at the 24th verse: Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and as the flame con­sumeth the chaffe, so their root shall be rottennesse, and their blos­somes shall goe up as dust. But how doth the fire devour the stub­ble? how doth the flame consume the chaffe? even in a moment; fire needs no blowing, to make it take hold of dry stubble: Stub­ble is at once flame and ashes. So speedy shall the consumption of these men be, who called the Lord to make speed; Then (I believe) they'l no more bid him make haste, The mouth of this iniquity will be stopt for ever. Our God shall come, and shall not keepe si­lence. [Page 309] A fire shall devoure before him, Psal. 50. 3. And then the wicked shall be silent in darknesse, 1 Sam. 2. 9. The fire of wrath is all heate, no light.

Lastly, all their slanders against the innocency of the Saints shall be so confuted, that the adversary shall have nothing to say against them, Their innocency shall be made, as cleare as the light, and their justice as the noon-day: Yea God will so order it, that these crafty oppressours shall carry a justification of God, and of his peo­ple in their own hearts. Their conviction shall be so strong and their light so cleare, that iniquity it selfe shall not be able to gain-say, but must stop it's mouth for ever.

JOB Chap. 5. Vers. 17, 18.

Behold happy is the man, whom God correcteth, therefore despise not thou the chastning of the Almighty.

For he maketh sore and bindeth up: he woundeth and his hands make whole, &c.

VVE have finished the first branch of exhortation, begun ver. 8. wherein Eliphaz moves Job, To seek to God, and un­to God to commit his cause; with the severall arguments and rea­sons, strengthning that Exhortation. At this 17. vers. Eliphaz be­gins a second branch of exhortation, and it is continued to the end of the Chapter. We have the exhortation (or dehortation rather, for it is exprest in the negative) in the latter clause of the 17. vers. Despise not thou the chastning of the Almighty.

The first argument by which he quickens Job to receive this counsel, lyes in the former part of the same verse, Behold happy is the man, whom God c [...]rrecteth: The argument may be framed thus. That condition is not to be despised, wherein a man is truly happy. But, under the correcting hand of God, a man is truly happy. There­fore that condition is not to be despised. Behold (saith he) happy is the man, whom God correcteth, therefore despise not thou the chastning of the Almighty.

Behold, happy is the man.

To behold, cals here both for attention and admiration: For here is a strange sight, An afflicted man, a blessed man, N [...]ll [Page 310] sence and reason cannot agree about this conjunction. They know not how happinesse and correction should meet, and kisse the same person: Therefore raise up thy attention (saith Eliphaz) to con­sider this wonder. When the Angell of the Lord appeared unto Moses in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush, he looked and be­hold the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed. And Moses said, I will now turne aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt, Exod. 3. 2, 3. Such a great sight, this text shewes us. A bush burning, and not consuming, yea a bush bur­ning, and yet flourishing, a bush on fire, and yet a fruit-bearing bush, a bush blooming and blossoming with the pleasantest and sweetest fruit on earth, or rather with the fruit of heaven, fruit up­on which we shall feed for ever in heaven, Fruit, the tasts of which, make a heaven here on earth, Happines. Well then, is this strange sight presented to us, with A Behold.

Happy is the man whom God correcteth, &c.

Happinesse is the enjoyment of good commeasurate to all our desires. That's perfect happinesse. Happinesse is the summe of all our de­sires, and the aime of all our endeavours: And when we have at­tained perfect happinesse, we shall be at a full point, both of our desires and endeavours.

But though all men have happinesse in their eye (to be happy is their end, and this happinesse is but one) Yet the wayes, which men have chalked out, as leading to happinesse, have been not on­ly various, but almost infinite. Some of the learned have reckoned up two or three Centuries, or hundreds of opinions, concerning this one point. And it is well observed, that men varied thus in o­pinion about happinesse, because they thought the enjoyment of that, wherein any of them was defective, would make them happy. He that was poore, said, I should be happy, if I had riches, and thence grew his opinion, that happinesse consisted in riches: The sick man said, I should be happy, if I had my health, and thence grew his opinion, that happinesse consisted in health: Another was obscure, meane and low, O (said he) how happy were I, if I were honourable, and thence grew a third opinion, that happinesse con­sisted in honour; Thus they varied according to their particular necessities and interests. But amongst all those Opinionists; we meet not with any one, who pitcht upon this in the Text. This is a Paradox to them all, A naturall man cannot place happinesse in [Page 311] correction. No Philosopher or pure Moralist ever said, happy is the man, that is sore; happy is the man, that is sicke; happy is the man that is disgraced; or happy is the man, that is in prison; These are riddles, such as nature is not able to expound or make out; the Philosopher would as soon place light in darknesse, the Sunne in a cloud, heat in coldnesse, the element of fire in the water, as bles­sednesse in sufferings. Therefore no marvell if Eliphaz usher it in, with a Behold, Behold happy is the man, whom God cor­recteth.

The word, Happy, is of the Plurall number, or rather of the [...] Beatudines constat indecli­nabile esse, & formam habere n [...]n tam pluralis quam dualis; Duall in the Hebrew. Some translate it in the Abstract, Behold the blessednesses of that man whom God corrects: But it is ful­ly rendred by the Adjective, as we, Behold happy is the man, &c.

There is much contention among the Grammarians about the word, whether it be abstract or concrete, a Nown, or an Adverb: But I will not stay on those, only consider a little what account is given, why the word is used plurally or dually.

First, it is to increase the signification, and heighten the sense; as noting the confluence of many good things in happinesse. Happi­nes Beati, beatitu do in multis boni­tatibus consistit [...]. Rab. D. is not a single good; happinesse consists in the concurrence or meeting together of many good things: God, who is infinitely happy, infinitely blessed in himselfe, and an infinite blessing, all blessing to his people, is not a single good, or a particular good, but he is all good, both to himselfe, and to his people. A godly man is happy in the largest sence, in all sences; because his, is not this or that particular good, but all good. And he is not happy only at this or that particular time, but at all times. He is as hap­py, when he is suffering under the hand of God, as when he is ser­ving God, as happy in his passive as in his active obedience. And therefore the same word expresses his condition, both in the one, and in the other.

Secondly, because there is a two-fold happinesse: First, the happinesse of this life. And secondly, the happinesse of the next; Temporall happines, and eternall happines; Corporall happines and spirituall happines. To note a complication of all these, the word may be given in the Duall or Plurall number; He that is thus corrected, looses not temporall happines, and he gains in spiritu­all, and toward eternall happines. The present and future happi­nes of the Saints, the happinesse of grace and of glory, differ but in [Page 312] degrees; It is the same state in a higher stature: The same book in a more correct edition and fairer letter. These differ as a child from a man, or as the morning light, from the light at high-noon; So then, this word includes all kinds and degrees of happines: yet, here it is properly to be understood of the happines of this life, which only is consistent with correction; There are no rods in Hea­ven, and we shall be past children, before we come thither.

Thirdly, we may answer plainly, that the word in the Hebrew Simplex & ge­nuina responsio est quod nomen ipsum quo He braei bea [...]itudi­nem notant, est plurale tantum, ut latinis opes d [...]vitiae Ames: in Ps 3. is only Plurall or Duall, being never read in the singular number: As in the Latine we have many the like words.

It is further observable concerning this word, that it is alwayes applied unto man, whereas the word (Barac) blessed, is applied both to God and man. This happinesse is a speciall and peculiar happinesse of man: The Lord being infinitely above, both obeying and suffering.

Happy is the Man.

Enosh, the Hebrew word for Man (of whom happinesse un­der correction is predicated) is very sutable to this businesse of correction. Enosh signifies a sickly, weake, miserable man: We might render the full sence of the word thus, Happy is that mise­rable man, whom God corrects. That is look upon a man accor­ding to the ordinary account of the world, and calculation of rea­son he is a miserable man, a weake, sickly man; yet happy is this weake, sickly, miserable man in the account of God, and by the calculation of faith. Grace makes that good sence, which is a con­tradiction, both in nature and in reason, A miserable man, and a hap­py man, one and the same.

In Psal. 1. the word Ish is used, Blessed is the man, that is, Bles­sed is that excellent man, that holy man, that strong man, walking and delighting in the Law of the Lord. Yea blessed with the same bles­sednesse is that miserable man (smarting under the rod of the Lord) whom God correcteth.

And yet blessednesse is joyned with all the words, by which man is expressed. It is joyned with Adam, Psal 32. 1. Blessed is the man whose iniquity is forgiven. Adam is the generall word for Man, and is therefore most fitly joyned with blessednesse in pardon of sinne, because all men are sinners, and no man can be blessed, ex­cept he be pardoned. Blessednesse is joyned also with Geber, a strong, powerfull and mighty man, Psal. 94. 12. Blessed is the [Page 313] man whom thou chastenest, O Lord, and teachest him out of thy Law; Blessed is (Geber) the great man, the honourable man, the highest by birth or place, whom thou chastnest.

The Chaldee Paraphrase restraines the word [Man] to an in­dividuall, Beatus Abra­hā, virpius quem corripuit Deus. Chald. Pa [...]ap. to Abraham, as if Eliphaz had put the instance in A­braham, and said, Behold, happy was that holy man Abraham whom God corrected, therefore despise not thou the chastning of the Al­mighty; I can give thee a famous example of a godly man correct­ed, Abraham (thy Ancestor) met with afflictions as well as thou, and yet he was a most happy man: therefore despise not thou the chastning of the Lord. But the word is generall, and so we are to un­derstand it; though this be a truth in any or every instance among the servants of God

I must yet put in a caution for the right understanding of this proposition, Blessed is the man, whom God corrects. The meaning is not, as if happinesse were the portion of every miserable man, or of every man that is afflicted, doe not thinke so; many are at once, corrected and cursed, troubled and miserable in trouble. To many, their present sorrows, are but the fore-tasts of eternall sorrowes; As Christ spake in a common case; These things are but the beginning of sorrowes: So we may say to the particular cases of many groaning under sicknesse, poverty, disgrace, &c. Alas, poore soules, ye are so far from being happy in these, that these are but the beginnings of your unhappinesse; God doth but begin to call for some ar­reares, due to his justice, which you must be a paying and satisfying to all eternity.

There is no happinesse in affliction naturally considered; it is ac­cidentall to afflictions, that happinesse is associated with them. Affliction in it selfe is grievous and it would be only so to us, did not the over-ruling, admirable dispensations of God, temper, or­der, dispose, and worke it to an end above its own nature; it is the art and wisdome of the Physitian, which corrects poysonous simples and ingredients so, as to make them medicineable. And did not the wisedome and goodnesse of of God, correct our correcti­ons, they would not be medicine to us, but poyson. It is not cor­rection, but the hand of God with it, and in it, which makes us hap­py.

Happie is the man, whom God correcteth.

The word, which we translate [...] Arguit, redar­guit, corripuit, praeparavit verba contra a­liquem, disputā ­do & ostenden­dojus. Quod et si verbis plerum (que) fiat pertinet ta­men ea vox ad sevirorem dis­cip inam & verbera, quae cujuspiā peccati reprehensionem comitari solet. Pined. correct, signifies to reprove or [Page 314] to convince, by arguments or dispute; To argue a man down from his errour, by the strength and clearnesse of reason or divine autho­rity. So Levit. 19. 19. Thou shalt not suffer sinne upon thy brother; thou shalt surely rebuke him. Thou shalt rebuke him, it is the word here used, that is, thou shalt bring such arguments, as may convince him of his sin, and lay his wickednesse open before him. This word is applied to corrections and afflictions in Scripture, because with convictions, we feele corrections frequently joyned; The Lord argues the matter, and (as it were) disputes with some very long, who yet will not let in divine truth, nor be perswa­ded, though they are perswaded; What doth he then? Then he sends correction with his redargution, he cloaths his words with blowes, disputes with a God in his hand, and brings an argument from feeling, when reasoning prevailes not. In this booke of Job, Elihu shewes it, Chap. 33. 16, 19. Then he openeth the eares of men, and sealeth their instruction, he is chastened also with paine upon his bed.

Hence observe, First,

That afflictions to the children of God at sorest, are but correcti­ons.

Blessed (or happie) is the man whom God corrects. You will say, but what is a correction? And how (in a strict sence) diffe­renced from judgements and punishments, and wherein doe they agree?

They agree first in the efficient cause. God layes his hand on man in both.

Secondly, They agree in the matter; the same evill, the same trouble to one man, is a correction, to another a judgement.

Thirdly, they may agree also in the degree; A trouble or an af­fliction may fall and lie as heavy, and be as painfull to sence upon a child of God, as upon the vilest wretch in the world; he may be as poore, as friendlesse, as sicke, as sorrowfull in his outward man, as any wicked man; he may lie in the same dungeon, and be bound with the same chaine, he may be slaine with the same sword, burnt at the same stake, eaten up with the same famine. So that both in the materiality, and likewise in the graduality of it, it may be the same on both, yet, upon one it is a correction, upon the other, a judgement.

What then is this correction? And where will the correction and the judgement part?

I conceive, that the infirmities of the Saints, and the sins of the wicked differ, as judgements and corrections differ. Now look upon those sins, which we call the infirmities of the Saints; they may be the same in the matter, the same in kind, yea (possibly) the same in the degree (I meane respecting the outward rule given by God, and the outward act committed by man) with the sins of those, who know not God, or who, in sinning, go against their knowledge.

Then, where doe they part?

Surely, where corrections and judgements part. And where is that? Especially in two things.

First, in the manner how. 2. In the end why, they are inflict­ed.

First, the Lord never corrects his children with such a heart, as he carries in laying trouble upon the loynes of wicked men. The heart of God is turned toward his children, when he corrects them, but his heart is turned from a wicked man; when he punishes him. The Lord is even pained (that I may speake as the Scripture often doth in this point, after the manner of men) I say the Lord expres­ses himselfe as pained, as grieved, as if every stroake went to his owne heart, when he strikes his children. When he is about to strike, he is (as it were) unresolved whether he shall strike or no, and as soon as he hath stricken, he (as it were) repents that he did strike them. All which motions of his heart the Lord shews us in the high­est strains of passionate Rhetorick, Hos. 11. 8, 9. But when he takes the wicked in hand to punish them, we reade of no passion ascribed to him, but these, delight or joy, and the effect of them, laughter: ha­tred or indignation, and the effect of these mocking at them, Pro. 1. 26. I will laugh at your calamity, and mock when your fear cometh. And when he resolves upon the destruction of his enemies, he speaks as if then he had unburden'd himselfe, and his heart were lighter then before, Isa. 1. 24. Ah I will ease me of my Adversaries, and avenge me of my enemies.

Secondly, the difference is as broad about the end. When God layes the rod of correction upon his child, he aimes at the purging out of his sin, at the preventing of his sin, at the revealing of a fa­therly displeasure against him, for his sin; The Lord would only have him take notice, that he doth not approve of him in such cour­ses. When these ends are proposed every affliction is a correction. But the afflictions of the ungodly are sent for other ends. First, to [Page 316] take vengeance on them. Secondly, to satisfie offended justice; justice cries aloud against them, and they have nothing to interpose, but their bare backs or naked soules. The Lord comes as a severe Creditor, and bids them pay that which they owe, or suffer and to prison, because they cannot pay. Secondly, observe.

A child of God is in a happy condition under all corrections.

As man (in a naturall or civill capacity) at his best estate is al­together vanity, Psal. 39. 5. So in a spirituall capacity, he is al­together happinesse, in his worst outward estate; Happy is the man whom God corrects, he is a gainer by correction: If he looseth any thing, it is but the drosse of his corruptions, By this therefore Isa. 27. 9. shall the iniquity of Jacob be purged, and this is all the fruit to take away his sinne: Corrections are not sent to take away his com­forts, but to take away his corruptions. That fire which God kindles upon his children, shall burne only (as it did the materiall bonds of the three children in Daniel) the spirituall bonds of their iniquity, that they may be more free to righteousnesse. Againe, Crrections are not manifestations of wrath, but an evidence of his love, and of their son-ship: Whom I love I chastise, Rev. 3. 21. And if ye endure chastning, God dealeth with you as with sons, Heb. 12. 7. The love of God is better then life, and to be a son of God is the highest priviledge of his love. Where shall we be hap­py if not in that which assures us of such love, and of love in such a relation? Hence the Apostle concludes (2 Cor. 4. 12.) So then, death worketh in us; death, that is, our daily sufferings and en­durings. He speakes (indeed) especially of sufferings for the truth, from the cruell hand of man: but it is true likewise of all sufferings under the correcting hand of God: Those stroakes which are deadly to our bodies, may yet worke for us. And what worke they? The seventeentth verse answers the question, Our light afflictions which are but for a moment, worke for us a farre more exceeding and eternall weight of glory. The sufferings of the Saints are active, and their passions opperative: But how doe they worke? Not by way of merit or earning (Our blood cannot oblige God) but by way of preparation. The Lord sends afflictions, to fashion and cleanse our hearts, as fit vessels to hold an exceeding weight of glory: Our bearing the heaviest afflictions doth not weigh so much as the least graine of glory, yet they fit our hearts for an exceedingly excellent weight of glory. We cannot say pro­perly, [...]. that they worke any glory, but by an Hyperbole in speech, [Page 317] we say, they work towards an Hyperbole in glory.

And if any doubt, can a man be happy when his outward com­fort is gone? Doubtlesse he may: For a man is never unhappy, but when he hath lost that wherein happinesse doth consist: The hap­pinesse of a godly man, doth not consist in his outward comforts, in riches, in health, in honour, in civill liberty, or humane relations; therefore in the losse of these he cannot be unhappy. His happi­nesse consists in his relation to, and acceptance with God, in his title to, and union with Jesus Christ, While he keeps these pri­viledges (and these he shall keepe for ever) what hath he lost, if he loose all besides these? He hath not lost any thing discerneable, out of his estate. Suppose a man were worth a million of money, and he should loose a penny, would you think this man, an undone man? No: His estate feeles not this losse, and therefore he hath not lost his estate. If a man should buy a thousand measures of corne or cloath, and should loose the given handfuls of the one, or inches of the other, would ye say, that this man had lost either his corne or his cloath. All the things of the world (and they only are looseable) which a godly man hath, are not so much to his estate as a penny to a million; They are indeed no proper part of his e­state, they are but an additionall over-plus to his estate: As the handfull of graine, or inch of cloath, are no part of the measure a­greed or bargained for: Only so much that speech of Christ imports, Mat. 6. 33. Seek first the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof, and all other things shall be added or ministred to you; your kingdome is whole & safe to you, though you have not these: These things are extrinsicall and forreigne to all that, which I reck­on upon as your estate: God having given us Christ, casts us in the creatures, as not comming upon any account in that vast act of his free love and bounty: And shall we account him unhappy, who hath lost these things, which were never brought to account as any part of his happinesse? Then happy still, though corrected. And which is yet more, correction takes nothing from the stock, but it addeth somewhat; correction brings in a revenue of profit with it: They (saith the Apostle, meaning our earthly parents) chastned us after their own pleasurs, but he for our profit. What profit? doe houses and lands: gold and silver, blossome from the correcting rod? Surely they may: But he meanes better profit then these, and a farre more noble merchandize: Gold and silver are poore and base, to the profit which comes in by chastnings; [Page 318] grace and holinesse come in this way: He for our profit, that we may be partakers of his holinesse, Heb 12, 10. We want nothing of the happinesse in heaven, but so much holinesse, as we shall have in Hea­ven. Surely then, whatsoever affliction takes away, it cannot take away our happinesse, for as much as it makes us greater sharers in, and partakers of holinesse.

And the corrected children of God, are unhappy only in the opi­nion of other men, not in their own; When did you ever heare any Quamvis san­cti videantur ignorantibus esse miseri, non possunt tamen esse aliud quam beati. Nemo a­liorum sensu miser est sed suo Nulli enim beatiores sunt, quam qui ex sententia sua & voto agunt. Humiles sunt religiosi, hoc volunt: paupe res sunt, pau­perie delectan­tur: Lugent, lu­gere gestiunt, &c. Salv. de gub. Dei. l. 1. of them say, they were unhappy, because they were corrected. I do not remember that I ever read or heard any of them say, O unhappy we, who are thus afflicted! Salvian answered this objection well, when he saw many scandalized at the afflictions of the Godly, thin­king theirs a very sad and pitifull condition: Doe you heare them complaining (saith he) or did they ever complaine to you? No man is to be aceounted miserable in another mans sense, but in his own: You make the complaint not they. The truth is, a holy heart can beare trouble with more ease, then a carnall heart can see it. Paul (whose whole life after conversion was but one continued affliction) was so farre from complaining and saying, O unhappy man that I am, that he rejoyced in tribulation, and was but as sorrowing, yet alwayes rejoycing I confesse, it becomes us to be more sensible of corrections, then of persecutions, the former being usually, sufferings upon our defects in grace, and the latter upon our highest actings and puttings forth of grace. It becomes the Saints to be humbled under corrections; but who hath heard them (when they were themselves) complaining of corrections? I have often heard them blessing God for corrections, I have often heard them say, it was, and it is good for us, that we have been corrected; And while the Saints write their afflictions upon the I [...]vrntory of their goods; we have no reason to put them to account or cast them up among their evils.

Lastly, A godly man cannot be unhappy while he enjoyes God And he usually enjoyes God most, when he is most afflicted. A wic­ked man is never unhappy in his own thoughts, till he hath lost his god, such a one as he is, his riches, his pleasure, his credit, these he makes his god, instead of a better, indeed, instead of Him, who is Best of all: These are looseable gods, and so his happinesse may soon be lost; but he that once enjoyes the true God, can never loose him and therefore can never loose his happinesse.

That of Saul, is one of the saddest speeches in all the booke of [Page 319] God, 1 Sam. 28. 15. I am sore distressed, for the Philistines make warre against mee, and God is departed from me. When trouble comes, and God departs, when sicknesse and poverty make war upon a man, and God be departed from him O how unhappy I what words can expresse the unhappinesse of such a man? But they who can take liberty, and estate, and life from us, cannot take God from us; and if God should take all these from us; he will not, he cannot (because he hath promised he will not) take himselfe from us: L (saith the Lord) will never leave thee, nor forsake thee Heb. 13. 5. And if God forsake us not, happinesse cannot, for he is our hap­pinesse.

A Heathen could say, it was unbecomming a Roman spirit, to cry out (in his losses) I am undone, while Caesar was safe: It is infinitely below a Christian spirit, to say, I am undone, while Christ is safe; such language is grossest barbarisme in all the Churches. They who cannot loose either their soules or their Saviour in the worst condi­tion, cannot be unhappy in any condition, much lesse then under the fatherly correcting hand of God.

Behold, happy is the man whom God corrects, is a truth which no stormes of trouble shall ever shake or weaken.

Therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty. That's the inference.

The word which we translate [despise] hath various significati­ons, and they will all be profitable for the clearing of this point: therefore I shall open them distinctly, and give some briefe notes upon every one in order.

First, It [...] Signifi­cat, spernere, fa­stid [...]re, repro­bare vel reji­cere aliquid cum fastidio, tanquam vile & contemp­tum, Sept. Reddun [...] ali­quando per [...] & hic per [...], ne re­nuas aut aver­seris. signifies to reject a thing, or cast it off with loathing; when a mans stomach turnes against some meates, or they goe against his stomach, loathing arises from it. So the word is used, Numb. 11. 20. when the people murmured because they wanted flesh, God threatneth them with satisfying their desires; Flesh would you have? You shall have flesh: it is a threat: But how shall they have it? You shall not have it one day, nor two dayes, nor five dayes, neither ten dayes, nor twenty dayes; but you shall have flesh even a whole moneth, untill it come out of your nostrils, and it be Ʋt sicut fasti­dio illu fuisset Deus op [...]mus, ita etiam fosti­dio illis sint creaturae, & suae ipsorum voluptates. loathsome unto you, or till you your selves despise it. It is most just with God, that they who loath his will, should at last loath their own desires. And that the creatures should not long please them, who take no heed to please the Creator. The least mixture of Gods displeasure, sowres our sweetest contents, and makes our ve­ry pleasures loathsome.

Where also (by the way) we may observe the great difference between earthly, and spirituall things: The best of earthly things, used too much or too often, grow loathsome: Angels food (Man­na or Quailes) will not goe down long with us. But Christ, the spirituall Manna, and all heavenly things, the more we have of them, and the longer we are dieted with them, the more we shall delight in them: These will not loath us, after two, or five, or ten, or twenty dayes, or after a whole months feeding on them: No, we shall feed on them dayes without number, or the whole day of eternity, without any loathings; use and delight, shall never cease or abate; appetite shall renew every moment, though our enjoy­ment be but one and the same, Yea, the Saints shall be so farr from loathing the pleasant cup of glory, that they ought not to loath, and (Christ strengthning them) they shall not loath the bitter cup of sorrow: Their stomachs shall not turne, though dieted more then two, or five, or ten, or twenty dayes with the bread of adver­sity, and the water of affliction. That is the first sense of the word, in allusion to nauseating at the sight or long use of meate: Loath not the chastning of the Lord.

Or the word may seeme to carry a reference to physick▪ or me­dicines, as well as meate, which you know is many times given in a better pill, or in a distastfull potion; The sick man is apt to loath the potion brought him, and turne his head away from it; what he take it? no not he. He had rather die then drink such a draught, he is ready to through it against the wall, and spil it one the ground rather then drinke it: But then his friends or the Pbysitian perswade with him; Be not angry, though it [...]e loathsome to your stomach, yet it is wholesome for your body: It is an enemy only to your di­sease therefore loath it not. So here, Eliphaz (as it were) brings in God, standing like a Physitian, or a father, or a tender mother at the beds-side, where a sick child o [...] friend lies, using many en­treaties and perswasive reasons to take a bitter potion; my child, or my friend, doe not loath, doe not dispise, no, nor distast this medicine, doe not cast it away; though it [...]e bitter in your mouth, yet take it downe, and the effects of it will be sweet to your whole body. We find in Scripture, afflictions compared to a cup; Our Lord Jesus calls all his sufferings for our salvation, a cup, and it was a cup tempered with the venome and poison, with the gall and wormewood of all our sinnes; it was a loathsome potion indeed; and such as would have turned the stomachs of all men and Angels [Page 321] to have drunke it. So much of the first sense of the word, as it signifies loathing, whether in respect of meates or medicines.

Now forasmuch as here is a charge given under this notion, not to loath chastnings. We may observe,

There is, or possibly may be an aversnesse in the best of Gods children for a time, from the due entertainement of chastnings.

He speakes as if most were loth to take them downe, and there­fore he exhorts, not to loath them: Even the Lord Jesus Christ (so farre as he was partaker of our nature) seemed to loath the bitter cup of sufferings. Hence he prayed hard, once, and againe, ye a third time, Father, if it be possible, let this cup passe from me, (Mat. 26. 39.) Yet at another time, he speakes as if he had been a thirst for that cup, and angry with Peter who would have hin­dred his draught, The cup which my Father giveth me, shall I not drinke it? Joh. 18. 11. and shortly after, he indeed drunke it up to the bottome. Affliction is also a bitter cup to the Saints, and they (as Christ) pray again and again, yea thrice against it, because to sense, no chastning seemeth joyous but grievous, Heb. 12. 11. through grace perswades them to drinke it, and faith gives them a tast of much sweetnesse, when they have drunke it: As a sick man is backward to take a distastfull medicine, till his reason hath over­come his sense, so a godly man is unwilling to beare afflictions, till his faith hath overcome his reason; Nor can he quietly en­dure the troublesome smart of the rod, till he is assured of the peaceable fruits of righteousnesse which grow from it, to those who are exercised by it. When the Apostle is carryed up on those Eagles wings of assurance, to see a house not made with hands eternall in the Heavens, then he groanes earnestly under the burden of his earthly Tabernacle, and desires to die; yet looking upon death, he saw no forme or comelinesse in that, why he should de­sire it; and therefore he seemes to correct himselfe, at least to draw his mind plainer with the next drop of his pen; Not for that we would be uncloathed, but cloathed upon, that mortality may be swallowed up of life. He speakes somewhat like a man, who in a time of heate, hastily strips himselfe to goe into the water, but putting a foot in, and finding it cold, calls for his cloathes againe. The Apostle in a true holy heate of spirit, had in his desires almost stript himselfe of his body, but putting a foot into the grave, he found that so cold, that he had no great mind to it, and therefore had rather keepe on the cloathing of his body, and have a suite of [Page 322] glory over it, then lay it downe. The Saints desire to live with Christ, but in it selfe, they desire not to die: They had rather their mortality should be swallowed up of eternall life, then their tem­porall life should be swallowed up of mortality. They that have grace, like not the disunions of nature. Now, as it is in the case of death (which i [...] to the Saints the last and greatest affliction) so likewise in the case of all afflictions, which are as renewed and lesser deaths, Though they embrace and kisse them (both in a holy sub­mission to the will of God, and in an assured expectation of their own good) yet they have nothing pleasing in them; much, which creates so much loathing, that the best doe but need counsell and encouragement to take and digest them.

And then if there be some aversnesse even in the best from these potions of affliction, tempered with the mercy and goodnesse of God; no wonder if there be an abhorrence in wicked men, from those deadly potions, mixt only with his wrath and justice. The Psalmist presents the Lord to us, with a cup in his hand (Psal. 75. 8.) In the hand of the Lord there is a cup, the wine thereof is red (which notes fierce wrath) and it is full of mixture: (This mix­ture, is of judgements, plagues, and punishments, this is the por­tion of their cup, Psal. 11. ult.) But what will the Lord doe with this mixed cup? who shall sip, at the top of the cup, he tels us not, but he is expresse, whose the bottome is, He powreth out of the same (some drops are spilt here and there) but the dreggs there­of, all the ungodly of the earth shall wring them out and drinke them; Alas they loath it, their stomacks turne at it: They have not been brought up to drink dreggs, they have had their wine well refined, and sparkeling with spirits in Christall glasses; and how can they get this down? They who have drunke so willingly and free­ly of the cup of sin, shall be forced whether they will or no to drink the cup of judgement. And it is not a sip or two shall serve their turnes, they must drinke all, dreggs and all, they shall drinke it to the bottome, and yet they shall never come to the bottome; they have loved long draughts, and now they shall have one long enough there is eternity to the bottom: If a cup of affliction, which (in the effect) is a cup of salvation, be sometime, or for a time, nause­ous to the godly, how deadly sick will the ungodly be, who must for ever drinke a cup of wrath and death?

Secondly, The word which, we translate despise, notes the re­jecting of a thing as unprfitable, or unusefull: That which a man [Page 323] despiseth, he thinkes he shall have no good by it: Things which are unprofitable are despicable: So the word is used (Psal. 118. 22.) The stone which the builders refused or despised, is become the head stone of the corner. There were master builders in the Church, who (when they surveighed all sorts of materials or stones for their fabrique of faith) looking upon the person of Christ, thought him fit only to cast out among the rubbish, as altogether unusefull; They layed him by, as a refuse-stone, who is the head corner-stone, both the strength and beauty of the whole building Thus the word is very appliable to the present Text, refuse not corrections, as unprofitable and uselesse: Say not (as the Jewes of Christ, Can any good come out of Nazareth? so) can any good come out of chastnings? Despise not the chastning of the Almighty.

And from this Notion of the word, we may observe a se­cond prejudice against the rod: Even the Saints are ready to con­ceive afflictions to be unusefull, and that they could well enough spare, and be without their troubles. A naturall eye never sees nor finds any thing but dammage by affliction; and a spirituall eye doth not alwayes see the advantage that comes by them Yea, he may sometime say of an affliction, it will be my undoing, and the ruine of my house, and yet, afterwards find it as a corner stone, the choicest outward meanes, which (through the blessing of God) hath united the walls both of his spirituall and civill buil­ding, the frame both of grace within, and comforts without. The Apostle Peter, hath a strange Parenthesis (1 Pet. 1. 6.) For having told them of their rejoycing in the safety of their spirituall estate, being kept (or secured as with a Garrison from Hea­ven) by the power of God, through faith unto salvation. Though now for a season (if need be) ye are in heavinesse through ma­nifold Temptations, or afflictions. Observe how he puts an If need be, or a supposition of necessity upon the afflictions of belie­vers. As if he had said, ye who are the Candidates of eternity, and heirs of salvation, may judge your selves past the rod or the ferula, and thinke, now ye have need of nothing but comfort or rejoycing in the hope of that salvation, ready to be revealed; but I tell you, you may have need of heavinesse yet, before you come to Heaven: and of manifold temptations, for the removing or subduing the cor­ruptions of your hearts, before you enter upon your incorruptible inheritance. We are apt to conceive chastnings to be of no use, when they are as necessary as our daily bread; Therefore [Page 324] despise not chastnings, as uselesse or unprofitable.

Thirdly, the word is applied often to the rejecting of a thing or person, as low, dishonourable and disgracefull: In this sense also it is appliable here. Despise not chestnings; That is, doe not thinke thy selfe disgrac'd when thou art chastised: the heart of man is naturally full of pride, Man is a proud peece of flesh. Nor doth he resent any thing more then his own dishonour; many can beare the paine of the crosse, better then the shame of the crosse. It is very observable to this purpose, how the Apostle describes the Lord Christ in his sufferings, Heb. 12. 2. He endureth the crosse, despi­sing the shame: as noting, that his being above the shame of the crosse, bore up his spirit under the crosse. To despise shame, is to looke upon that, which the world counts shamefull, not only as despicable in it selfe, but as not hurtfull to us: When a man des­pises an enemy, as Goliah disdained David (1 Sam 17. 42.) he presumes himselfe above his enemies power to hurt him: So to despise shame is to make nothing of it, or to thinke our selves no whit the worse for it; yea rather to thinke our selves honoured by it, And untill in this sense we can despise shame, we shall despise cor­rection and the crosse. Who is it almost, that finds not this the hardest text in all the chapter of afflictions? Zedekiah was more afraid to be mocked by the sugitive Jewes, then to be a prisoner to the King of Babylon, Jer. 38. 19. If a man be poore, presently he thinks he is disgraced: If he be weake he doubts he shall be con­temned: If he loose his estate, he fears he shall loose his credit in the world; he was a man of place, some body among his neighbours, but now he shall be slighted. Suffering for well doing is our crowne, suffering for evill doing is our shame, but it is our shame to suffer.

Fourthly, To despise a thing, notes the slighting of it, as if we did not think it worth while, to take any notice of it; and so this will be the sense, Despise not thou the chastnings of the Lord; that is, doe not slight the chastnings, do not lightly passe them by, do not look upon them as inconsiderable, as not caring what God doth with thee or thine When God layes his hand upon us, he would have us lay it to our hearts. As it is our duty to be affected with mercies, so likewise with chastnings. If a malefactor should say to the Judge, do what you will with me, I care not; or a child to the parent, correct me as long as you will, I care not, how unnaturall were this? This is properly to despise afflictions. Some are like Leviathan in this sense (Job 41. 27.) They esteeme iron as straw, and brasse, as rotten wood: They [Page 325] make nothing of the acts or instruments of Gods displeasure. This is grosse dispising. But besides every undervaluing, or inadver­tency of the correcting hand of God, hath a degree of this despising it. That exhortation ought never to be forgotten, which speaketh to us, as unto children, Hebr. 12. 5. My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him. The Greek word imports, the Litling; or thinking of them little. Do not think the chastnings of God little, doe not little, or slight them [...], in thy thoughts. Neither faint when thou art rebuked, that is, doe not thinke thy afflictions so great, that thou must needs sinke and faint under them. These are the two extreames, into which our hearts usually run, when chastnings are upon us. Some erre by neglecting the hand of God, as light; and others by fainting under it, as too heavy. As a good heart takes notice of, or will not de­spise a little, the least comfort; So it will take notice of, and not despise a little, the least crosse. When a man hath a small losse in his estate, if he say, this will not undoe me, I can beare this, I will fare as well, and goe as fine as ever for all this, such speeches or thoughts are a despising of the chastening of the Lord. We are to observe the hand of God taking away, as well as giving a penny. So when a man hath a little fit of sicknesse; If he say, I shall rubb out this well enough, this is to despise the chastning of the Lord; We are to blesse God for every hours health, and to be sensible of his hand in every hours sicknesse, or aking joynt.

Every affliction is a messenger from God, it hath somewhat to say to us from Heaven, and God will not beare it, if his messen­gers be despised, how meane so ever: If you send a child with a message to a friend, and he slight and despise him, you will take it ill. I remember what the story relates of Galienus the Emperour, who, when the report came to him, that Egypt was lost, what then (said he) cannot I live without the flax of Egypt? And when the report was brought that a great part of his dominions in Asia was wasted: Cannot I live (said he) without the delicacies of Asia? To speake thus from a principle of mortification toward the crea­ture, is the character of an excellent spirit; but to speake thus from a contempt of the Providence of God, is the character of a proud, or of a stupid spirit. When we heare of the losse of a child, of a friend, or of a losse in our estate; To say, what then? I can beare that well enough, I have more children, other friends, estate e­nough besides that, This (I say) is a high despising of affliction.

There is one thing further, in the fifth place, observable in this word, Despise not thou the chastnings of the Lord. The word is Extenuatio est, nam plus sign­ficatur quam dicitur, sc. maximi facito discipli­nam Domini, nihil tibi antiquius aut potius sit, quam ut illius corre­ctionem aequo animo accipies. an extenuation or a lessening of the sense. The holy Ghost intends more than is expressed; for the truth is, when he saith, Despise not, &c. his meaning is this, shew reverence, highly prize and e­steeme the chastning of the Lord. As (for instance) when the Apostle saith in 1 Thess. 5. 20. Despise not prophecying. Doe you thinke, this is all that is due unto an Ordinance of God, that a man should not despise it? Surely no, he meanes then, prize prophecy­ing highly, have it in great esteeme: So in 1 Tim 4. 12. and Tit. 2. 15 when he saith, Let no man despise thy youth, is that all the holy Ghost meanes? That Timothy a godly Pastour should only not be despised by his people? No, his meaning is, that they should honour, respect and reverence him, as one that watched over them in the Lord. I might give you divers other Scriptures, where when the holy Ghost only forbiddeth the sin, he intendeth the duty or grace in strictest opposition to that sin. So here, Despise not thou the chastning of the Almighty; layes this charge and duty upon us, highly to esteeme the chastning of the Lord, we must put afflictions amongst our comforts and rank them with our blessings. Not to de­spise, is but the first step beyond sin, but that includes the last and furthest step of duty, which becomes us under chastenings. [...] aradi [...]e [...] Vincevit, liga­vit, & per Metaphoram cast [...]gavit, eru­d [...]vit verbis aut verberibus, ad disciplinam vel poenam transfer­tu [...] Sicut vox Lamad, quae do­ctrinam signifi­ca [...] [...] all [...].

So much of the act forbidden, despising. Now, for the object, chastning. The originall verb fignifies to instruct, or to teach; so it is translated, Chap. 4. v. 3. Thou hast instructed many. Instruction is both by words and blowes. The wisdome of God mixes a rod with his word, and chastening with teaching: Therefore it is pro­miscuously used in Scripture, sometime for teaching, and some­time for chastning. Chastning belongs properly to children, who are wanton and ungovern'd, who have a bundle of folly in their hearts, which the rod of correction driveth out. To be chastned hath a double aspect upon us, first upon our priviledge. Secondly, upon our weaknesse. To be chastned notes our priviledge and re­lation, as children, unto God our father. He hath revenges for his enemies, but chastnings are a part of his childrens portion; yet in that we are chastned, it taxes us of weaknesse; we are but chil­dren, foolish, unruly, wanton, and therefore we goe almost all our dayes, with a rod at our backs. Though the Saints on earth com­ [...]d among themselves, are some Children, and others men; yet [...] earth, compared with those in Heaven, or with [Page 327] what themselves shall be in Heaven, are children, and therefore they have what fits their state, chastening and correction. This chastening is sometime put for revenge, or the exactest and severest retribution of justice; Thus it is said, Prov. 7. 22. That the foolish young man caught by the subtill harlot, went after her as a foole to the correction of the stocks; That is, as a wicked man goes to pu­nishment. And when the Prophet describes the sufferings of Christ which were vindictive in the highest degree; he expresses it in this word, The chastizement of our peace was upon him (Isa. 53. 5.) though Christ were the infinitely and most entirely beloved Son of his Father, yet he did not chastize him as a Son, but as an enemy or malefactour, for he chastened him in our stead, and under the same notion, that we must have been chastened, who were enemies and malefactors. So then, the word signifies sometime judiciary chaste­ning, but here fatherly chastening, which will yet appeare more clearely, in opening the last terme of this verse, which shewes us the efficient cause of this chastening. The Almighty.

Despise not the chastning of the Almighty. The chastening rod is in the hand of Shaddai, the Almighty. This is one of the glori­ous names of God.

And he is so called, first from his power, to goe thorough with [...] Variè deriva­tur. Primò á ra­dice [...], Va­stavit, spolia­vit populatus est, perdidit, quasi vastatorem dicas, ie invi­ctum & poten­tem cui nemo resistere possit. Et volunt non nulli Deum hoc nomen traxisse á vastatione mundi facta in d [...]luvio. Graeci reddunt▪ [...]& latini Omnipotens. what he takes in hand: His worke never stickes in the mid way for want of strength to bring it to the end. Despise not the correction of an Almighty hand. Further, the word notes not only power e­nough to correct, but power to destroy, spoyle and lay all waste before him. God hath gained this Title or Attribute, from destroy­ing or wasting his enemies. Some of the Rabbins designe the Ori­ginall of it, to that speciall act of his destroying power: The drow­ning of the old world, he shewes his Almighty power in destroying and pulling downe, as well as in making and setting up this goodly frame. To this the holy Prophets are well conceived to allude, when they say that, Shod, scil. Destruction, commeth from Shad­dai, The Almighty. We have it in two expresse Texts, Isa. 13. 6. Howle yee, for the day of the Lord is at hand, it shall come as a De­struction from the Almighty, It shall come as Shod from Shaddai. So (Joel 1. 15.) Alas for the day, for the day of the Lord is at hand, and as a destruction from the Almighty shall it come. It will be pro­fitable for us to consider, under what name God is expressed, when he is chastening his own children.

Secondly, others derive this name from the conjunction of two [Page 328] Hebrew words, whereof the one (Dai) signifies it Sufficeth, or is sufficient: And the other, though it be but a letter (Shin) yet Nonnulli putát [...] compositū esse ex verbo [...] sufficit & litera [...], quae supplet locum & sensum rela­tivi Ascher, & ita denotat De­um sibi suffici­entem, & qui omnibus largitur sufficientiam respōdens Grae­co [...]. Drus. Alii dedurunt [...] a [...] Quod Mammam significat, quasi mammosum di­cas quod omnia alet. Drus. it supplieth the part or place of the Relative (Ascher) which, and so the word put together sounds thus much, Who is sufficient, or who is All sufficient, Despise not the chastning of him that is All­sufficient. Thou art under his correction, (who doth not take from thee, because he wants himselfe; who doth not let thee want, be­cause his owne store is spent, out of which he used to supply thee. He alone hath sufficiencie in himselfe, and he is at all times Allsuffi­cient for all others, and gives sufficiency to as many as he pleaseth. That of the Apostle fils this signification of the word, Act. 17. 25. Neither is he worshipped with mens hands, as if he needed any thing, for he giveth to all, life and breath, and all things.

Thirdly, the word is conceived to come from Shad, which in the Hebrew signifies a breast, the mothers breast or pap, by which she suckles her child. And answerable to this notion, in most of those places, wherein God is expressed in that act of his providence, making fruitfull and giving increase, he hath this name, Shaddai: as noting, that he hath the Great milkie breast, which nourishes and suckles, which feeds and strengthens all creatures: that is the word of his blessing, not only makes fruitfull & multiplies, but preserves and keeps alive, Thus Gen. 49. 25. The Patriarch, old dying Jacob, bles­ses his son Joseph in this forme, And by the Almighty (Shaddai) who shall blesse thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deepe that lies vnder, blessings of the breasts and of the wombe. His Father Isaack had sent him to Padan▪Aram under the influences of the same blessing, almost in the same words (Gen 28. 3.) God Al­mighty blesse thee, and make thee fruitfull and multiply thee. And the Lord himself speaks thus to Jacob, when be appeared the second time to him, after his coming from Padan-Aram. I am (El-Shaddai) God almighty, be thou fruitfull and multiply, Gen. 35. 11. that is I can make thee fruitfull and multiply thy posterity, and I can feed them, as fast as they multiply, and give thee fruit for thy family, as well as make thy family fruitfull, Thou shalt not over-charge me with the greatnesse or numerousnesse of thy house. Trouble not thy selfe, let thy children be my care, at my finding, how many soever they are, let my purse pay for all: I am El-Shaddai, God Almighty. [...]o then as the justice and exact wisdome of God are set forth in the former branch under the title Elohim, Happy is the man whom God (Elohim) corrects; [Page 329] So (least we should thinke of God under that notion only) his power and alsufficiency, his goodnesse and tendernesse are set forth in the next branch, Despise not the chastening of the Almighty. You are under the rod of Shaddai, an All-powerfull, an Allsuffi­cient, an All-nourishing God. The verse following seems to joynt in with, and suit this fully, He makes sore and he bindeth up, he woundeth and he healeth; One part shewing us God, as a Judge, wounding and making sore, the other as an Allsufficient Friend, and father or Physitian healing and binding up. Take two or three Notes, from the consideration of the name, under which God is here expressed.

First, The lightest chastnings come from a hand that is able to destroy. When the stroak is little, yet a great God strikes. Al­though God give thee but a touch, a strip, which scarce razes the skin: Yet he is able to wound thee to the heart. Know, it is not be­cause he wants power to strike harder, but because he will not, be­cause he is pleased to moderate his power; Thou hast but such a chastning, as a child of a year old may well beare; but at that time, know, thou art chastned with a hand able to pull down the Pondus est [...]n voce [...] noli [...]spe [...]nere clementiam ejus in quo vivis, qui te uno momento potest commi­nuere. Coc. whole world; The hand of Shaddai, The Almighty gives that little blow. Men seldome strike their brethren, lesse then their po­wer, they would often strike them more, their will is stronger then their Arme. But the Lords arme is stronger (in this sence) then his will. He doth but chasten, who could destroy. And this carries a mighty perswasion with it, not to despise the chastning of the Lord, how little soever, for he can strike harder, if thou slightest this. He can break thy bones, who hath not yet broken thy flesh. Feare him (as our Lord Christ argues, who, though at present he hath made thy head onely to ake a little, yet) can kill thy body, and after he hath killed, hath power to to cast into hell, Luke 12. 5.

Secondly, In that afflictions come from Shaddai, a God all­sufficient, God would have us conceive in all our troubles; That

When he takes away any or all created comforts from us, yet he is himselfe Allsufficient for us.

When we are chastned by the losse of any good things, Shaddai doth it, who hath the power of all good things in his hand. When he takes away riches, or health, or relations, if he doth not take away himselfe from us, we cannot be comfortlesse, for Alsufficien­cy stands by us.

Lastly, He dealeth with us, but as a tender nurse, or mother, in all his chastnings. The mother strikes the child a little blow with one hand, and gives it the breast with the other, she gives it a little tap with one hand, and a spoon with the other. Consider your chastnings, they are the chastnings of Shaddai, who, as a tender mother, hath a breast ready to nourish, and a spoon to feed, while he chides or chastens. And if by greater afflictions, he wounds or makes you very sore, you shall not want carefull dressing and assu­red healing;

Vers. 18. For he maketh sore, and he bindeth up; he woundeth, and his hands make whole.

This verse containes an exemplification of the former ground, why we should not despise the chastning of the Almighty: For, if it should be objected against the former assertion (Happy is the man whom God correcteth) Where is this happinesse? Is there happinesse in sores and wounds, in sicknesse and weaknesse, in po­verty and in wants? Who cannot easily want this happinesse, and not complaine? Eliphaz seemes to answer for God in this text. If your faith cannot come up to believe this, stay but a while, and your sence shall teach it you. Who would not be glad of a wound, when he knows he shall have Shaddai for his Chyrurgion. If you will not allow a man is happy, when he is sore will you not allow him happy, when his sore is bound up by such a hand? If you will not grant a man is happy, when wounded, you cannot deny him happy, when he is thus healed. The Almighty will not leave them in their sores, in their wounds: As he hath a rod, so he hath a swath, as he hath a sword, so a salve. His plaister is ready for your wound, and his medicines for your diseases. It is true of God above all others, One and the same hand smites and cures. Thus of the ge­nerall Ʋna eadem (que) manus vulnus opem (que) tulit. meaning and connexion of this verse.

He maketh sore.

The word is used in the second Chapter of this book, ver 13. of Jobs friends, that they stood silent, for they saw his griefe was great, or his sorenesse was very great. It notes the griefe and [...] Do [...]uit anima vel corpore. sorenesse, either of mind or body; Some translate, He woun­deth: But the next clause bears that distinctly, or we may joyne both, the one as the cause, the other as the effect, He maketh sore by wounding.

And bindeth up.] The word is appliable to any kind of bind­ing. 1. To the binding of captives in prison with chaines. 2. To [...] Ligavit, colli­gavit. the binding of ornaments upon the head, Ezek. 29. 9. 3. It is u­sed, metaphorically for binding to obedience or punishment, Job 34. 17. Shall even he that hateth right governe? The Hebrew is, shall he bind; because Governours bind their subjects or servants, either to doe what they command, or to suffer what they inflict. 4. It is also applied by a metaphor to the binding up of those civill breaches or ruines, which are upon a people, Isa. 3. 6, 7. A man shall take hold of his brother, &c saying, be thou our Ruler, and let this ruine be under thy hand In that day he shall sweare, say­ing, I will not be a Healer, or a Binder up. 5. It is used for the applying of ligatures, with which the medicine or plaister is bound upon the wound or sore; And this word doth therefore also sig­nifie the healing of a wound, because the due binding of the wound is one halfe of the patients cure, and a very great part of a Partim quidem i [...]sa deligatio sanat, &c. Maxima deli­gationis vis est. Hip. in Offi [...]ina Chyrurg. Chyrurgions skill, as the learned Physitians observe in their Dis­courses about wounds and chyrurgerie; Ligature contributes so much to healing, that the same word serves, for both, or either. Now (Shaddai) the Almighty is admirable at this, when he hath made a sore, he can make an exact Ligature. We often find these two together, Psal. 147. 3. He healeth the broken in heart, and bindeth up their wounds. The Prophet Ezekiel (Chap. 34. 4.) complaines of the false Prophets, Because they did not heale that which was sicke, and bound not up that which was broken. They had neither skill nor conscience, either spiritually to break hearts, or when they found them broken to bind them up. They knew not how to fasten Gospel promises, and holy counsels upon the heart, that the wounds of it might be closed, and were therefore, Phy­sitians of no value.

There are two interpretations given of these words, He maketh sore, and he bindeth up.

First, Some expound them by an Enallage of the Participle for the Verbe, thus, He maketh sore, and he bindeth up, that is, He making sore, bindeth up; as if the very act, by which God smites, had an influence upon the healing, and a tendency to the restoring Vulnerat & me­detur, i. e. vul­nerans medetur, vulnerando sa­nat. of his afflicted ones, He making sore, bindeth up We find such con­structions frequent in Scripture, Isa. 65. 22. They shall not build, and another inhabit; They shall not plant, and another eate: That is, They building, another shall not inhabit, and they plan­ting, [Page 332] another shall not eate. The negative is not fixed upon their building, &c. but upon other inhabiting. And so, Deut. 22. 4. Thou shalt not see thy brothers Asse, or his Oxe fall down by the way, and hide thy selfe from them; That is, Thou seeing thy brothers Asse or Oxe fall down, shalt not hide thy selfe from them: A man some­times could not but see his brothers Asse or Oxe fall down, but he seeing must not at any time, hide himselfe from them, that is, not succour them, so (by the way) that phrase of hiding may be in­terpreted, by that of the Prophet (Isa. 58. 7.) Thou shalt not hide thy self from thy own flesh. But to the poynt here, we see, He maketh sore & bindeth up, may congruously to other Scripture speakings, be rendred, He making sore, doth bind up, as if the wound were a part of the cure, and the sore a plaister. We know that a wound in nature is sometime a part of the cure: It is a common and a necessary practise in Chyrurgery (and to that the holy Ghost may allude in this place) When they perceive a wound or a sore, to which me­dicines Illa est vox Do­mini, percutiam & ego sanabo, hoc faciunt me­dici. Ferrum ge­stant & c [...]rare veniunt. Clamat secandus & se­ca [...]ur saevitur in vulnus ut ho­mo sanetur. Aug in Ps 50. Chyrurgus saepe vulnus infligit, & ferro sibi spatium ad commodam cura­tionem aperit. cannot well be appied (and so unfit for healing) either to make a new wound in the whole flesh, or to make the first bigger. The murderer wounds to kill, and the Physitian wounds to cure. He comes as it were, arm'd with instruments of cruelty. The patient whose flesh is to be launced, cryes out, but yet he laun­ces him. The patient whose flesh is to be seared, cryes out, but yet he sears him. He is cruell to the wound, while he is most kind to the wounded.

An ignorant man would wonder to see a Chyrurgion, when he comes for healing, make the wound wider, yet so he must do, and he doth it upon urgent reasons. As when the orifice is not wide e­nough to let in the medicine, or to let out the corruption, or can­not admit his searching instruments to the bottome; In such cases, he saith, Ʋnlesse I increase your wound, I cannot cure it. Thus often times the Lord is compelled to wound, that he may heale; or fit our wounds for healing. Our wound is not wide enough, to let out the sinfull corruptions of our hearts, to let in the searching in­struments and corrasives of the Law, or the blame and comfortable applications of the Gospel.

We may observe from the sence of the words, That

The woundings and smitings of God, are preparatories for our cure and healing.

It is said (Isa. 53. 5.) of Christ, that with his stripes we are healed: and it is in this sence a truth, that we are healed with our [Page 333] own stripes: We are healed with the stripes of Christ merito­riously, and we are healed by our own stripes preparatorily; the stripes of Christ heale us naturally, our own stripes heale us occa­sionally; or his in the act, ours in the event. (Prov. 27. 6.) Faith­full are the wounds of a friend, his wounds are faithfull, because he wounds in faithfulnesse: The healings of many are unfaithfull, They heale the hurt of the daughter of my people deceitfully, is the Lords complaint by the Prophet; they skin over the wound, but they doe not cure it. Let the righteous smite me, it shall be a kindnesse, and let him reprove me, it shall be an excellent oyle which shall not break my head, Psal. 141. 5. Much more may we say, Let the righteous Lord smite me, and it shall be a kindnes to me; let the righteous Lord reprove and correct me, it shall be as an ex­cellent oyle, which shall not breake mine head; it shall heale my heart: How healing then are his salves, whose very sores are a salve?

Secondly, Take the words in the plaine rendring of them, no­ting onely thus much, that God makes sore, and bindeth up: So we have two distinct acts, often ascribed to God in a figure, to set forth judgement and mercy, the afflictions, and deliverances of his people, (Hos. 6. 2.) Let us return unto the Lord, for he hath torne, and he will heale us, he hath smitten, and he will bind us up, (1 Sam. 2. 6.) The Lord killeth and maketh alive, (Deut. 32. 39.) See now, that I, even I am he, and there is no God with me, I kill, and I make alive, I wound and I heale. Hence observe,

It is the property of God, to take care of all the sicknesses, sores or evils of his peopls.

As God is the great correcter and instructer of his people, so he is the great Physitian of his people; If he make a wound, he will take care for the healing of it; He doth not make sores, and leave others to bind up. Mighty men wound, but they take no care for healing; they can impoverish and spoyle, but they care not to re­paire; they can pull down and root up; let who so will build and plant. Shaddai the Almighty God doth both: If he break thy head, come to him, humble thy selfe before him, and he will surely give thee a plaister, which shall cost thee nothing but the asking. And whereas he doth not willingly afflict or grieve, he doth most willingly comfort and heale the children of men, Lam. 3. 33. He speaks of it as a paine to himselfe to make us sore, but to make us sound is his delight and pleasure. Satan is the Abad­don, [Page 334] the destroyer, and he only destroys; he makes wounds, but he heals none, he kills, but he makes none alive.

The second branch of the verse [He woundeth, and his hands make whole] is but a repetition of the same thing, yet with some addition to, or heightning of the sence. To make sore, and bind up, are not so deep either in judgement or in mercy, as to wound and make whole.

The word used for wounding, imports a dangerous and a dead­ly [...] Transfodit, transfixit vel cruentavit. wound, or to make a man all gore blood. It signifies to strike quite thorough; and it is divers times applied, to note that stroke which God gives his worst enemies. Psal. 68. 21. But God shall wound the head of his enemies, or he shall strike them quite through the head. Verse 23. He shall dip his foot, or make it red in the blood of the ungodly. And Psal. 110. 5. The Lord shall strike through Kings in the day of his wrath. Hence observe, That

God sometimes makes very deep and great wounds in his own servants.

Such wounds, as by the sight of the eye, you cannot distinguish them from the wounds of his mortall enemies. He strikes tho­rough both heads and hearts of his own people: Or as Simeon said to the blessed Virgin Mary, Luke 2. 35. A sword pierceth through their soule also.

But then lastly note,

God never makes a wound too great for his own cure.

The power of God to save, is as great as his power to destroy, his healing power and his wounding power, are of the same extent; His justice cannot out-act his mercy, both are infinite.

And not onely doth he heale the wounds which himselfe makes, but he can heale the wounds which men make; even all the wounds which the utmost power and malice of man can make. He is able to doe more good, to shew more mercy than all crea­tures are able to doe hurt or mischiefe. We finde the state and condition of a people sometimes so wounded and sick, that men have despaired of recovery; Being consulted, they may answer, your sore cannot be bound up, and your wound cannot be healed, your estate is gangren'd and past cure: So he said as was toucht before (Isa. 3 8.) In that day shall a man sweare saying, I will not be an healer, for in my house is neither bread nor cloathing; Alas, I heale you, I cannot heale you, your troubles are past my skill to remedy or redresse. Thus man is sometimes at a stand, he [Page 335] cannot heale what men have wounded; but God is never at a stand, your old festred sores, and wrankled wounds which have taken wind, discourage not his chirurgery. When a people are in such a pickle or pittifull plight, as the Prophet Isaiah describes the kingdome of Judah, in Chap. 1. 5 6. The whole head is sicke, and the whole heart is faint, from the sole of the foot even unto the head, there is no soundnesse in it, but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores; they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with oyntment. When (I say) the case of a people is thus, and they can get no healer: Yea though a people (like the woman, Mark 5 25▪) have had an issue of blood (in bloody battels, which is now almost Englands case) many yeares; and have suffered many things of many Physitians, and have spent all that they have, and are nothing bettered, but rather grow worse; yet if Christ doe but touch such a sicke, diseased bleeding people in mercy, and they touch him by faith, they shall be healed, and their fountaine of blood will immediately dry up. Or if their condition requires some lon­ger operation, he can effectually take such a course for their cure: He is abundantly furnished with all instruments and abilities for the making of a perfect cure.

It is well observed, that three things are necessary for a Chy­rurgion.

First, He must have an Eagles eye, one that is good at healing, had need be good at seeing.

Secondly, He must have a Ladies hand, soft and tender to han­dle the sore gently.

Thirdly, A Lions heart, a stout strong heart, for if he faint, how shall his patient keep up his courage?

These three are exceeding necessary in Chyrurgery about natu­rall bodies, but much more in Chyrurgery about Civill and Eccle­siastical bodies, the healing of Churches and Kingdoms. And where shall we find, whither shall we send for Physitians, qualified with this Eagles eye, to look into all our sores and sicknesses? with this Ladies hand, to deal gently and tenderly with our wounds? with this Lions heart, stoutly and couragiously without fears and faint­ings, to go thorough with the work? Well, if men should not be found thus furnished, the Lord is; He hath an Eagles eye, an All­seeing eye, seven eyes of providence and wisdome, to look through our sores, and into all our distempers: He hath (as in allusion we may speak) a Ladies hand, soft and tender, to deal gently and gra­ciously [Page 336] with a people; He can dresse our wounds, and paine us lit­tle, scarce be felt while he doth it. And he hath the Lions heart, infinite courage and strength of spirit, to undertake the most gastly wounds or swolne putrified sores. Let us therefore rest our selves assured, that whatsoever our personall or our nationall sores, our personall or our nationall wounds be, be they what they will, or what we can call them, desperate, incurable, such as have discourag'd many from medling with their cure, or sham'd those that have; yet our Shaddai the Almighty God, can bind them up and heale them, fetch the core from the bottome, and close the skin upon the top, so tenderly dresse, and so perfectly cure them, that a scarre shall not remaine, unlesse it be to mind us of his infinite skill and goodnesse or of our own duty and thankfull­nesse.

JOB, Chap. 5. Vers. 19, 20, 21.

He shall deliver thee in six troubles, yea in seven there shall no evill touch thee.

In famine he shall redeem thee from death, and in war from the power of the the sword.

Thou shalt be hid from the scourge of the tongue, neither shalt thou be afraid of destruction when it cometh.

ELiphaz still prosecuteth his former Argument, to take Job off from despising the chastnings of the Almighty spoken of at the 17th verse. And having shewed, first in generall, that they are happy whom the Lord corrects: and secondly, That the Lord heals as well as wounds, is as ready to bind up as to make the sore; he illustrates this by giving,

First, An assurance of deliverance from evill, and that

  • 1. In the generall, at the 19th verse.
  • 2. By an enumeration of particular cases of greatest dangers and outward evills.

And secondly, to shew the happinesse of those whom God cor­rects, he gives an assurance of positive blessings, which shall in due time be heaped upon their heads, whom God had before woun­ded with sorrows, and loaded with afflictions.

The nineteenth verse is a promise of deliverance from evill; [Page 337] He shall deliver thee from six troubles, yea in seven there shall no evill touch thee.

To deliver, notes here, the snatching or pulling of a man out of [...] Spoltavit, ra­puit, eripuit tanquam ab hoste [...]ut malo. Eripere prae­dam. [...] Augustia, in­terdum signifi­cat hostem, quasi angustia­torem dicas the hand of an enemy, out of the mouth of danger.

The Hebrew word for [Trouble] comes from a roote, which signifies to straiten or to narrow a thing up in a little compasse; and so by a metaphor, to vex and trouble, because they who are straitned in any kind, are pained and troubled. And when we heare of any in trouble, we usually say, such are in straits. And this word is often translated, a strait, (2 Sam. 24. 14.) I am in a great strait, saith David, when he was put upon that hard e­lection, between sword, pestilence and famine. So Judg. 11. 7. and 1 Sam. 13. 6.

The holy language, expresses an enemy or adversary by this word, because an enemy puts us upon straits, and so, to much trouble.

And to raise the force of this word to the highest, it is used to sig­nifie the pangs and throwes of women in child-bearing, in which the mother labours in grievous straits, while the infant labours for enlargement. Troubles ever meet us in, or bring us into straits, they may well change names, which are so neere in nature; I find the word so translated here in some books, He shall deliver thee in six straits, and in seven, when thou art so encompast about, shut in and incircled by evils on every side, that thou knowest not which way to move or turne, much lesse to get out, then the Lord will give enlargement, and either find a way out for thee, or make one, as he did for Israel at the red sea, through those mighty waters.

In six, yea in seven.] This phrase of speech, is very considerable. Some numbers in Scripture, have a kind of eminency or excellency in them: I intend not any large discourse about numbers; only in briefe. Those three numbers, Three, Six and Seven, are applied to a speciall signification by the Holy Ghost. A great number, a per­fect number, is expressed by any one of these three numbers; A three-fold cord, (that is, a cord of many or sufficient folds) is not easily broken, Eccles. 4. 12. Three times thou shalt keepe a feast to me in the yeare, Exod. 23. 14. Three times in a yeare all thy males shall appeare before the Lord, ver. 17. The candlestick had three branches, Exod. 25. 32. and three cubits was the height of the Altar, Exod. 27. 1. Three Cities of refuge were appontinted for [Page 338] the manslayer, Deut. 19. 7. and the addition made, is of another three. ver. 9. Three witnesses gave the compleatest evidence re­quireable, as Two, the least admittable in the law, Deut. 17. 6. That (besides a rule) there was a mystery in most of these, I think no man doubts, though what the mystery was, may be presumption in any man to determine. Of this we are sure, that the highest my­stery, and perfection of all numbers and things, is found in One Three. That Three in One, The sacred Trinity; And in the common speech of most, if not of all languages, Thrice happy, Thrice great, Thrice honourable, note a man advanced to the very pinnacle of Happinesse, Greatnesse and Honour, The num­ber Three, or the Numeral Thrice, imply a compleatnesse in all num­bers.

That the number six notes perfection, may be seene in the work of Creation; The Lord could as easily have made the world in six or in one moment, as in six dayes: but the Lord saw it good, to take a compleate number of dayes, for so compleate a worke. God threatens Gog, his perfect and compleate enemy, with a com­pleate punishment, or with judgement in perfection. (The justice of God can be as compleate in punishing, as the malice of man can be in sinning.) Ezek. 39. 2. I am against thee O God, the chiefe Prince of Meshech and Tubal, I will turne thee backe, and leave but the sixth part of thee, so we translate; yet in the margin of our books, we find the Hebrew thus; I will strike thee with six plagues, or, I will draw thee back with a hooke of six teeth.

Seven is a famous number, implying, First multitude, Secondly perfection: The barren hath borne seven (saith Hannah in her song, 1 Sam. 2. 5.) that is, many she is a compleate mother, she hath a flourishing family, many children. And in opposition to this (Jer. 15. 9.) She that hath born seven languisheth, that is, she that had many children, now hath none. Seven devils were cast out of the woman (Luk. 8. 2.) that is, a multitude of devils: So the seven Spirits, the seven Churches, the seven Trumpets, the seven Seales, the seven Vials, &c. in the Revelation, speake the compleatnesse and perfection of each in their kind; whether good or evill: and that is appliable to the particular sense of the text, (Prov. 24. 16.) The just falleth seven times a day; that is, he falleth often, almost continually into trouble, and yet he ri­ses againe, God delivers him. The Hebrew word Shebange, is neere in sound to our English seven; and to note that seven [Page 339] is a compleate full number, the same Hebrew word signifies seven, and full, seven and satisfied or compleate. And the word to swear, [...] Septem [...] Satura­tus, impletus, abundavit [...] Jura­vit, inde ju­ramentem, a Septenario nu­mero ut quidam patant, quod juramenta fi­eri debeant multis adhibi­tis & idoneis multum (que) con­firmatis testi­bus et causis. is of the same extraction in that language, with the word seven; the reason is added, because in or about an oath, many and impor­tant causes and grounds are required.

But to passe from single numbers, I shall consider them in con­struction or conjunction, as here six and seven. He shall deliver thee in six troubles, yea in seven there shall no evill touch thee: Some understand this strictly and precisely of those two numbers six and seven; And expound the text by the enumeration of those six or seven particular evils made by Eliphaz in the following verses; For having said in generall, that God will deliver his in six troubles and in seven, he reckoneth up severall troubles, and gives us (as it were) a catologue, or a particular of those evils by name, amounting to six or seven; As 1. Famine, 2. Warre, 3. Scourge of the tongue, 4. Destruction. 5. Evill beasts, 6. Hurtfull stones; here are six, and if a seventh evill come upon thee, in seven no evill shall touch thee.

But I rather take this expression, six, yea seven, to be a fixed number put for an unfixed, a certaine number for an uncertaine, and that uncertaine number to be a great number, the greatest number, any number imaginable. We find this kind of speaking frequently in Scripture; In the thirty third of this booke of Job, v. 29. Loe these things God workes twice and thrice; which we translate, these things God workes often-times, when numbers are doubled with an increase in the latter, it notes a mighty growth of the whole number. Twice and twice (we know) is but foure times; but, twice and thrice, may be more then five times, twice and thrice, is oftentimes, no man knowes how of­ten.

We find the number next above this in the same signification; Three, and foure, are put for many, very many; (Amos 1. 3.) For three transgressions of Damascus, and for foure: Some un­derstand it of three or foure speciall sins, of which Damascus was chiefely guilty: namely, 1. Idolatry, 2. Incest, 3. Luxurie, 4. Oppression: Or, Three may be taken for a Cardinal number, and Foure for an Ordinal; for the Fourth, as if some fourth sin were so sinfull, and had such a malignity in it as the Lord would not pardon. Thus Foure is put for the fourth, Prov. 30. 15, 18, 21, 29. Three things are never satisfied, yea foure things say [Page 340] not it is enough. That is, a fourth thing (sc. fire being the most in­satiable of all the rest) saith not it is enough The copulative particle (and) is often in Scripture taken comparatively; for much more. Psal. 125. The mountaines are round about Je­rusalem, and the Lord is about his people: So the Hebrew; we translate by a comparative of similitude. As, So. But more emphatically to the scope of the place by a comparative of excesse. Thus, As the mountaines are about Jerusalem, sc, to fortifie and defend it; so much more is the Lord about his people fortifie and defend them. In this sense we may take the co­pulative And in Amos. For three transgressions, the Lord would not turne, &c. but much more for a fourth, would he not turne away the punishment thereof. The former, three were enough to provoke the Lord to destroy you; but for this fourth, he is resol­ved to be irreconcileable, and will destroy you. Others adde Three to Foure, which make seven, as if the Holy Ghost had said, for seven (that is manifold) transgressions of Damascus, I will not turne a­way, &c. But rather take the numbers distinct for Three and Foure. that is, for the many, for the multitude of transgressions committed in Damascus, I will not turne away the punishment thereof. Not that the mercies of God are exceeded by any number, or that because they had gone on to sin three and foure times, that is, ve­ry often times, therefore the mercy of God was at a stand, and could goe on no further; but these numbers three and foure, note the boundlesse impenitency of those Syrians, or their malicious persecutions of the people of God, dayes and times without num­ber. They turne not from their transgressions, theirs are three and foure, they will never have done; therefore I will begin to pu­nish. or I will never have done punishing, I will not turne away the punishment thereof. Such formes of speech are frequent in Heathen O ter (que) qua­ter (que) beati. Virg. lib. 1. Aenead Ter (que) quater (que) manu pectus percussa Deo rum. Id. l 4. Authors, when they would enlarge, or multiply the sense.

Againe, Ʋbiseptenario numero [...]ctonarius adai ur ingentem ex­primit & pro pè infinitam multitudinem. The numbers seven and eight, have a greater emphasis in Scripture (Eccles. 11. 8.) Give a portion to seven, and also unto eight. That is, give much, and give to many, give (yet dis­creetly) to all commers: We must not stint nor bound our cha­rity; Give a portion to seven, give to many; and if there come more, give to more, give also unto eight; Charity preferres some, but she refuses none, who are meet objects of charity. And when the Lord would shew what choice and store of able men, both [Page 341] for counsell and action, his people should have in times of dangers and invasions, He prophecies by Micah, that the people shall speake thus (Chap. 5. 5.) When he, (sc. the Assyrian) shall tread in our palaces, then shall we raise against him seven Shep­heards, and eight principall men, that is, we shall muster multitudes of wise, valiant, faithfull men, every one of which may be fit to command or direct in chiefe; Seven Shepheards and eight principall men.

So then, He shall deliver thee in six troubles, yea in seven, &c. is as if the Holy Ghost had said by Eliphaz, O Job, The Almighty Shaddai, of whom I have spoken to thee, is of such power and hath such an unwearied arme, that he is able to deliver thee, not only in one, or two, or three, or many troubles, but he can deliver thee in six, yea in seven, in all thy troubles, let the number of thy afflictions be as great as thou canst imagine. The power and malice of men cannot multiply thy troubles faster, than the power and goodnesse of God can multiply thy deliverances, yea, if he pleases, he could perfect seven deliverances for thee, before they can lay the plot of one trouble against thee. Observe hence in brief, first,

Deliverance it is of the Lord.

He shall deliver thee.] Whatsoever the instruments are, by which deliverance is brought to you, or in whose hand soever deliverance is put: Know, that the worke and procurement of it, is from a­bove: It is the priviledge of God, and of God alone to be a Deli­verer. And he hath deliverance at his command, Psal. 44. 4. Com­mand deliverances for Jacob. Man must humbly petition for, and beg deliverance. But God stands not intreating the creature, or debating the matter with Kings and Princes, with the strongest and most hard-hearted Pharoahs to deliver his people, but he sends forth a writ of deliverance, and Authoritatively commands deli­verance, when it is his pleasure a person or a people shall be delive­red. Secondly, obseve;

The Lord can deliver as often as we need deliverance. In six troubles, yea in seven.

This should beare up our hearts in the returnes, the multiplied returnes of troubles Though (as Rheumatick old age is described, Eccles. 12. 2.) The clouds returne after raine: That is, though one evill follows upon or treads on the heele, of another: though, as soone as one blacke cloud is dissolved, and we begin to say (as in nature) this was a rainie day, but sure the next will be faire, yet [Page 342] the next proves more over-cast and lowring then that; even in such a case, know, God hath a wind in his first, which he can let out to scatter those clouds, before they dissolve; or if they dis­solve, he hath a Sun, at command, to dry up the fallen raine. The Lord hath a succession of mercies for our succession of sorrows. Say not then, we have got off this trouble, but what if another come? If another come, you have the same God, and he can give you another deliverance. Have not our later experiences taught us this truth? Have we not been delivered in six troubles, yea in seven: Our straits have not been single; we may say (as she in Genesis at the birth of her son) Behold a Troope. Enemies have not given over conspiring, and acting against us, and (we ought to speake it to his glory) our God hath not given our delivering and doing for us, Not once only, but many a time, may our Israel now say, If it had not bin the Lord, who was on our side, when men rose up against us, they had swallowed us up quicke, when their wrath was kindled against us. The waves and bilowes of our Seas; The rocks and clifts of our Shores; the foundations and the pinacles of our Parliament houses; the wals and gates of our Fenced Cities; the swords and bucklers of our Mighty men in the high-places of the Field, may all beare this inscription, Shaddai delivers in six troubles, yea in seven.

The Lord spake once to his people, as if he were weary of delive­ring, or would not deliver (Judg. 10. 10.) There we reade the people of Israel in a great strait, crying to the Lord for deliverance, but he answers, ver. 11. Did not I deliver you from the Aegypti­ans, and from the Amorites, and from the children of Ammon; and from the Philistines. The Zidonians also, and the Amale­kites, and the Moabites did oppresse you, and ye cryed unto me, and I delivered you out of their hand. Here are seven troubles in which they found deliverance. But, as if six or seven deliverances (which we have expounded for boundlesse deliverances) were now the utmost bound of deliverance, he resolves, v. 13. I will deliver you no more, And at the 14. he turnes them off to their Idols for helpe; Goe (saith he) and cry unto the gods, which you have chosen, and let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation; But what was the reason of this refusall? The reason was this, not because God was weary of delivering that people, but because that people were weary of their God. Ye have forsaken me and chosen other gods, ver. 13. If we choose our selves another god; then we choose our selves another deliverer; so long as we [Page 343] looke upon God, as our God, so long we may looke upon God, as our deliverer; God would never have turned them off for delive­rance to any thing below (what was in their conceit) a God.

How sad will it be, now that we are in great troubles, and crying daily, Lord deliver us out of these straights, for thou art he, whose name is, The Deliverer in six troubles, yea in seven; How sad (I say) will it be, if we have put God to reade the Chronicle, and repeate the historie of his deliverances given us, as he did to Israel, and say, I delivered you in 88 from the Spaniard; I delivered you in 1605. from the Gun-powder-Treason; I delivered your Parliament, I delivered your City, I have often delivered your Armies; and some­times crown them with glorious victories, now I will deliver you no more; Will not such speakings from providence, be a plaine con­viction, that we have forsaken the Lord, and chosen other gods? God hath sometime (what a miracle of mercy!) chosen those, who forsook him, but he never (so stedfast is he in faithfullnes) forsook any, who chose him to be their God. If he keepe not such, from, yet he will certainly preserve all such in trouble, as it follows.

Yea in seven there shall no evill touch thee.

He saith not, He shall deliver thee from six troubles, and from Non dicit â sex­sed in sex; non quod ab illis non possit, sed quod cum acciderint ab illis liberet, ut in illis non succumbat. seven: As if troubles should only threaten, but never come upon us; or as if all our deliverances should be preventions, but he shall deliver thee in six troubles, yea in seven, there shall no evill touch thee

[Evill] signifies sometimes the evill of sin, and sometimes the evill of punishment. We may here take it either way. The Lord will so keep up thy spirit, and direct thy way in trouble, that thou shalt not defile thy selfe with the evill of sin; thy troubles shall purge, not pollute thee. And he wil so keep thee, that thou shalt not be annoyed by any evill of punishment; If fatherly displeasure should appeare a­gainst thee, wrath shall not. Love shall be mixed with thy correcti­on; with thy wormwood and gall (as the Church speaks in the La­mentations) thou shalt have a temperament of hony, and of sweet­nesse Ita eripiet, ut nullum malum attingat, e [...]tiāsi tentari & con­flictari s [...]na [...] ad tempus, nocu­mentum tamen non capies. Coc. in loc. though troubles presse thee, yet evill shall not Touch thee.

Not touch thee.] This notes exact deliverance; we think ourselves well many times, if we can come off from dangers with a scratch face, with a wound, or with the losse of a limbe: but to come off without the losse of a haire, or which is lesse, without a touch, speakes a compleate deliverance. It astonisht Nebuchad­nezzar, [Page 344] Dan. 3. 27. to see the three children come out of the fiery fornace, without a haire of their heads singed, without any change of their coats, or the smell of fire. So much this imports, thou shalt passe the pikes, through six, yea seven, a whole army of trou­bles, and no evill shall touch thee; When the woman told the tempting Serpent, God hath said, ye shall not eate of the fruit of the tree in the midst of the garden, nor touch it, Gen. 3. 3. She im­plyed a charge of totall abstinence. And when the Lord salth, No evill shall touch thee, it implies a promise of totall deliverance. In the first and second chapters of this book (and it is the same o­riginall word) Satan begs leave of God, that he might touch Job, and touch all that he had. Now here Eliphaz seemes to touch that string, No evill shall touch thee; as if he had said God will not let his servants be overwhelm'd (as thou art) with evils, no evill shall so much as touch them. And the truth is though Sa­tan obtained leave of God, to afflict the body of Job with paines, and he made it all over as one wound, yet no evill touched him, in the sence here intended: Though Job was all over evill sores, yet there was not so much as the least scarre of an evill upon him; Trou­bles touch't him, but evils did not, And troubles may touch the ser­vants of God but evill shall not. Hence observe,

God saves and delivers his people from all evill, even while they are in the midst of trouble.

He delivers as well in trouble, as from trouble, while trouble is continued, good may be enjoyed. While his are in the water and in the fire, God is with them, and his presence is more then deli­verance (Isa. 43. 2.) If God be with us, though all evils are upon us, yet no evill touches us. The presence of the chiefe good, is banishment to every evill. As a wicked man may be loaded with good things, and yet none of them touch him; that is, doe him a­ny good. So a godly man may be loaded with evils, and yet none of them touch him, that is, doe him any hurt. And thus, we may understand that of the Apostle (1 Cor. 10. 14.) God is faithfull, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that you are able, but will with the temptation also make away to escape; that ye may be able to beare it. Temptation you shall have; but with temptation, even while temptation is upon you, or while you are in temptation, The Lord will make a way for you to escape the evill of that temptation. Thus with or in trouble, we have deliverance. To be kept from the evill of trouble [Page 345] is a deliverance from trouble, while we are in trouble.

Thus far of the generall promise.

Now Eliphaz goes on to particulars in the 20 verse, &c. As if he had said, Least thou shouldst think, I deale onely in generall notions, that I may more easily elude and deceive thee. Therefore Dolosus versa­tur in universa­libus. I will now give instance in the point, and name what troubles I meane: I will ascend with thee to particulars, and reckon up the greatest outward evills, the most pinching straits that befall the sons of men, or the children of God, and out of all these, I affirme The Lord will deliver thee.

Vers. 20. In famine he shall redeem thee from death, and in war from the power of the sword.

Thou shalt be hid from the scourge of the tongue, &c. Fa­mine Redimere est lucrari ex alte­rus potestate in­terposito precio velpotentia, con­ [...]ravim detinen­ [...]ium, ad facien­dum liberū aut suum [...] Redemit, libe­ravit ex augus­tia, servitute, &c. leads the Vanne of this great Army of Evills, here muste­red up.

He shall redeem.] But what is it to redeem from Famine? To redeem properly is, to take a man out of the power of another, by price or by greater power; Redemption is an act of speciall favour, and it notes a speciall distinction by favour. When God threat­ned Pharaoh and his people with swarmes of flies and promised that his own people should be free, I will sever in that day, the Land of Goshen, in which my people dwell, that no swarms of Flies shall be there, vers. 22. This act of divine discrimination, is called Redemption in the next verse. And I will put a division (Heb. a Redemption) between my people and thy people; That is, those Armies of flies, which invade thy people, shall not med­dle with my people. To see one perish with, and our selves saved from the sword, is redemption in war. To see others hunger-starved and our selves still fed, is redemption from famine, though our selves were never in the hands, or between the teeth of famine. A people devided from the troubles of others, are redeemed from those troubles. Such redemption our Saviour speaks of, Mat. 24. 40, 41. Two shall be in the field, the one shall be taken, the other left; two women shall be grinding in the Mill, the one taken, the o­ther left.

In Famine.] Famine is the want of bread, and bread is the stay and staffe of life (Lev. 26. 26. Isa. 3. 1. Psal. 105. 16.) when this stay is gone, our lives fall quickly or slip away. When this staffe is broken, the thread of life breaks too. Man goes by the [Page 346] bread in his belly, more than by the staffe in his hand; Except bread hold us by the arme, and stay us up, down we fall. Famine is so like, or so near, or so certaine a harbinger of death, that the text puts them together. In famine he shall redeem thee from death. Fa­mine is numbred among the sore judgements of God, if it be not the sorest judgement, Ezek. 6. 11. Jer. 24. 10. And therefore re­demption from it, is one of his choicest outward mercies. We may collect how sore a judgement famine is by the effects of it.

First, It causeth faintnesse and madnesse, Gen. 47. 13.

Secondly, Hunger burneth, Deut. 32. 24. That word is not u­sed in the Hebrew, except here. Famine kindles a fire in the bow­els; When the naturall heat hath no fewell put to it to feed upon, it feeds upon nature. Sutable to this, is the description of lamenting Jeremiah in the famine of Jerusalem, Their faces are blacker then a cole, Lam. 4. 8. and Chap. 5. 10. Our skin was black like an Oven, because of the terrible famine. Both the coal and the oven contract their blacknesse from burning heat.

Thirdly, It causeth pining and languishment, Lam. 4. 9.

Fourthly, Shame and howling, Joel 1. 11.

Fifthly, Rage and cursing, Isa. 8. 21.

Lastly, It breaks all the bonds of nature, and eats up all relati­ons: Read that dre [...]dfull threatning, Deut. 25. 53, 54. and that dreadfull example, Lam. 4. 10. Tender mothers eating their chil­dren. Famine eats up our bowells of compassion, and then it eats our bowells by relation: And which comes yet nearer, Famine is such a devourer, that it causeth man to devoure himself. The Pro­phet describes a man in a fit of Famine, snatching on the right hand, and yet hungry, eating on the left, and yet unsatisfied; when he can­not fill his belly abroad, he comes home to himself, and makes bold with his own flesh for food, Every man eating the flesh of his own arme, Isa. 9. 20.

We read of many great Famines in Scripture, and withall of Gods care to redeem his people from them. Abraham, Gen. 12. who (at the call of God) denied himself, and came out of his own, into a strange Land, was presently entertained with Famine. One would have thought, God should have made him good chear, and have spread a plentifull table for him, causing his cup to over-flow, while he was in a strange Land, and a meer stranger there; yet he met with a famine, but the Lord redeemed him from that famine, by directing him to Aegypt, that famous store house for his people▪ [Page 347] Jacob and his sons were redeemed from famine, in the same Egypt, afterward their house of Bondage.

It is a precious comfort to have bread in such a promise as this, when there is none upon the Board. God takes care for the bodies of his people as well as for their souls, he is the father of both, and the provider for both. And while we remember what sore affli­ctions have bin upon many Nations and people by famine; While we remember Samaria's Famin, 2 Kings 6. Jerusalems Famin, Lam. 4. and that storied by Josephus in the Roman siege of that City; While we remember the late famins in Germany, and the present one in many parts of Ireland; While we consider, that the Sword threatens this Nation with famine: Surely we should labour to get under such a promise as this is, that we may plead with God in the midst of all scarcity and wants; Lord thou hast promised to redeem Thine in famin from death: There is no dearth in Heaven: And whatsoever dearth is on Earth, the plenty that is in Heaven can supply it. How sad would it be, if your poor children should come about you, crying for bread, and you have none to give them; How much sadder would it be, if your poor children should be made your bread, and ground to pie­ces between your teeth, as in the famin of Jerusalem: In such a time, to look up to God in the strength of this promise, will be a feast to us, though we should perish in the famin.

But how doth God redeem from famin?

First, The Lord can make the barrell of meal, and the oyle that is in the cruze, though but little yet to hold out and last, while the time of famine lasts; Such a miracle redeemed the poor widdow from death, in that great famin, 1 Kings 17.

Secondly, He can redeem by lengthning one meal, to many days. Elijah went forty dayes in the strength of one dinner. Man li­veth not by bread without God, but man may live by God without bread.

Thirdly, Not onely are the stores of the creatures his, and the fruitfulnesse of the earth at his command, but if he please he can open the windows of Heaven; he can bring bread out of the clouds; he can make the winds his Caterers to bring in Quails and abundance of provision for his people. Thus also he can redeem his from death, in the time of famine.

Or fourthly, He can doe it in a way of ordinary providence, by making the land yeeld it's naturall increase, and by giving [Page 348] strength to the Earth, to bring forth plentifully, for the use of man.

Fifthly, While the common judgement lasts, he can make some speciall provision for his; And make a redemption of division, as he did in another case for his people, Exod. 8. 22.

And lastly, We may improve this promise, not only for redemp­tion from death in famine, but for plenty of consolation, though we should die in famine. When the bread is quite taken away from your Table; your hearts may feed upon such a word as this, as up­on marrow and fatnesse. Christ can feast your soules, when your bodies are ready to starve, he can fill your spirits with joy and sweetnesse, when there is nothing but leannesse in your cheeks; Thus the Prophet Habakkuk triumphs in God (Habak. 3. 17.) Though the Fig-tree shall not blessom, neither shall fruit be in the Vines, the labour of the Olive shall faile, and the fields shall yeeld no meat; The flock shall be cut off from the fold, and there shall be no herd in the stalls: Yet I will rejoyce in the Lord, I will joy in the God of my salvation. He was feasting upon God, while he imagines the world starving; he sees all things in God, though the world should afford him nothing. That soule is well fed and taught, which can be rejoycing, while it's own body is starving.

And in war from the power of the Sword.

War is the second evill. Famine and war goe often together, yea they two seldome goe without a third, the Pestilence, 2 Sam. 24. Jer. 18. 22. And though in the order of the words, famine [...] bellum à radice [...] vesci, edere, per Metaphorà pug­nare, quia g [...]adius in bello de­vora [...] hominum corpora. In bello se mutuò homines devorant & obsumunt. be set before war, yet usually war is the fore-runner of famine. The sword cuts off provision, and when it selfe hath devoured much flesh, it leaves no bread for those who survive. It is observa­ble that the originall word for war here used, comes from a root signifying to eat or to devoure, and so by a Metaphor it signifies to fight, or strike with the sword. And the reason, why the same word, which signifies war, signifies to eat, is because the Sword is such an Eater or rather a Devourer, and it eats two ways.

First, the Sword eats up the bodies of men, drinks up their bloud, dispeoples a Land; And then

Secondly, It eates up and consumes the fruits of the earth, and hence War is the mother of Famine. Therefore we find, that when the great peace and so the plenty of the Church of Christ is [Page 349] prophecied of, and described, Isa. 2. 4. and in Micah, it is thus ex­pressed, They shall beat their swords into plow shares, and their speares into pruning-hookes. As if he should say, while the sword is abroad in the field, the plow shares will do little there; For the most part Justice is silent in time of war (the sound of the trum­pet Inter arma si­lent leges. and drum, is too loud for the Law) and when the Law stands still, the plongh stands still; Therefore when the sword is in motion, both are at a stand. Hence the promise, that Swords shall be beaten into plow-shares, and speares into pruning-hookes, that is, with peace, you shall have bread and wine, which note the abundance of all other things. The ancients embleam'd peace by Eares of corne, and Concord by (a Cornu-copia) a horne of plenty; riches are the fruit of peace: And safety is the priviledge of the Saints in time of war, In war they shall be delivered from the power of the sword.

The Hebrew is, They shall be delivred from, or out, of the hand of the sword: Sometime in Scripture we read of the face of the sword, which notes the sword coming and approaching to a peo­ple; And sometimes we read of the mouth of the sword, which notes the sword come, devouring and eating up a people; And here we have the hand of the sword, they shall be delivered out of the Gladius manu apprehensus & elevatus, sym­bolum est ex­tremi discri­minis & prae­sentis hostis: Quasi diceret etiam in ipsa pugna vel inter tot manus gla­dios agitantes & contra te vi­bantes salvabe­ris. hand of the sword, which notes (as we translate) the power of the sword: Or, that forme of speaking may be understood by an Hypallage, From the hand of the sword, that is, from the sword in the hand, which phrase imports present danger; when the sword is unsheathed and drawn out, when it is in the hand ready to strike, then the enemy is ready to charge, and then the Lord deli­vers; He shall deliver from the sword in the hand, or out of the hand of the sword. So Psal. 127. 4. Children of the youth, are as arrowes in the hand of the mighty, that is, as arrowes ready to be shot. And Psal. 149. 6. Let the high praises of God be in their mouthes, and a two edged sword in their hands; noting actuall re­venges taken on the enemies of God, and actuall praises given to the name of God, at the same time.

So then, the meaning of these words, He shall deliver thee from the power of the sword, or out of the hand of the sword, is this, sup­pose thou art in such a condition that the swords are drawn about thy eares, and thou art in the midst of a thousand deaths and dan­gers, in the very heat of a battell, yet then the Lord God can and will deliver thee.

And this likewise is a comfortable promise, for us to lay hold on, in these times. It is a time of war to us all, and there are many of our friends and brethren (as it were) in the very hand of the sword; Desires are often sent to the Congregation, by one for a husband, by another for a brother, by a third for a servant, by ma­ny for their friends, gone forth to meet a sword in the hand of an enemy skilfull to destroy: Here is a promise, to comfort and sup­port such; The Lord in time of war, can deliver out of the very hand of the sword, or, when swords are in hand; when thou­sands of swords are drawn together, preparing for, or smiting in the day of battell; know, then God is a deliverer. In the most present dangers, God shews the most present help. (Psal. 23. 5.) Thou shalt spread my table and cause my cup to overflow, before the face of my enemy, even then, when my enemy is nearest and looketh on. As when the sword is in the hand of the Angel, so when it is in the hand of man, A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand, but it shall not come nigh thee, (Psal. 91. 7.) Not nigh thee? what? when they die on this side and one that side, on every hand of a man, doth it it not come nigh him? Yes, nigh him, but not so nigh, as to hurt him; The power of God can bring us nigh to danger, and yet keep us far from harme: As good may be locally near us, and yet vertually far from us, so may evill; The multitude throng'd Christ in the Go­spel, and yet but one toucht him, so as to receive good; so Christ can keep us in a throng of dangers, that not one shall touch us, to our hurt.

Yet we are not to take this or the like holy writs of protection, as if God would deliver all his people, from famine and from the sword; we know many precious servants of his have fallen by these common calamities; The Lord knows how to distinguish his, when sword and famine doe not. Neither doth this word fall, though they doe: If the servants of Christ are not delivered from these troubles, they are delivered by them, and while they are over­come by one trouble, they conquer all.

Vers. 21. Thou shalt be hid from the scourge of the tongue, neither shalt thou be afraid of destruction when it cometh▪

This verse contains a second paire of evills: First, The scourge of the tongue. Secondly, Destruction.

Two things are here to be enquired into, about the former.

  • [Page 351]1. What is meant by the scourge of the tongue?
  • 2. What it is to be hid from it.

The scourge of the tongue.] Mr Broughton reades it thus, Quo tempore lingua fl [...]galla­bit homines. Drus. [...] In piel est de­trahare vel no­cere lingua. Thou shalt be delivered (or thou shalt be hid) when the tongue whippeth. And another to the same serce; At what time the tongue shall be scourging of men, thou shalt be secured from it. And that word (Leshon) the tongue, in Piel, signifies to detract, to traduce or slander; the same word is used both for the instru­ment of the tongue, and one of the worst acts of the tongue, ca­lumination; or we may render it according to the exact let­tter of the Hebrew elegancy, to Betongue a man: We use such a kind of speaking in our language, as to strike a man with a cudgell or a Cane-staffe, is to cudgel or cane a man; and if a man be shot with a pistol, we say he was pistol'd; so a man smitten with ano­thers tongue, is said in the Hebrew, to be Betongu'd, or such an one hath betongu'd him.

We leave the Verbe, and translate by the Nowne; From the scourge of the tongue. In construction (Beth) In, is often ren­dred [...] Saepe reddi­tur per Min [...]. by (Min) From, as Grammarians know. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God in all thy heart, or from thy whole heart, or from the heart-root: So here, Thou shalt be hid in the scourge; that is, thou shalt be hid from the scourge, when the tongue is lash­ing and whipping, thou shalt be hid from the lash and scourge of tongues.

But what may we understand by this scourge of the tongue?

First, Some take it for publique accusations before a Judge or Magistrate. Many scourge their brethren at the Tribunal of Prin­ces, Rev. 12. That accuser of the brethren, that traducer, the De­vill, is conceived to make those accusations by his agents, in those times, before the heathen Emperours, against the Christians; The Christians in that age, were extreamly scourged by malignant and malevolent tongues, tongues set on fire of hell, as the Apostle James speaks, Chap. 3. 6. And so the scourge of the tongue, may be that punishment, which they by false accusations obtained a­gainst the innocent; their tongues got judgement against them sometimes to be scourged or whipt; therefore also, that very work of the tongue is well called scourging. Our Lord Jesus was cru­cified upon the tongues of the Jewes, before he was crucified upon the crosse by the Romans. The Jewes cryed out first, crucifie him, crucifie him, here was the crosse of the tongue; The conspirators [Page 352] against Jeremiah, advise thus (Chap. 18. 18.) Let us smite him with the tongue; that is, let us accuse him to the King, that he may Accusemus eum apud regem & omni industria & ratione ef­ficiamus, ut publica senten­tia vapule [...]. Flagellum lin­guae est poena in judcio con­stitu [...]a, & po­stulata fieri à calumniatori­bus. be smitten by a publick sentence. In this sence a man is impriso­ned by the tongue, banished by the tongue, hang'd and burn'd by the tongue, that is, the tongue doth all these virtually (or viti­ously rather) by false accusations, causing these things to be done actually and formally.

Secondly, Others interpret the scourge of the tongue, to be those terrible and dreadfull reports which amaze, lash and afflict the spi­rit about the approach of dangers. As, when a report is rung in the eare, that an invading enemy, spoylers and plunderers, arm'd with power and malice are at hand to take away estates, liberties and lives. How many have bin beaten about the ears, and scourg'd with such Alarums? (Jer. 50. 43.) it is said, The King of Babylon hath heard the report of them: what report was it? and of whom? A spie rides in, and kills the King with his tongue, strikes him tho­rough with his tongue, before he was toucht with the sword of the Medes and Persians: How? He brought him a sad report, that the enemy was upon his march, then it follows, The King of Babylon hath heard the report of them, and his hands waxed feeble, anguish took hold of him, and pangs as of a woman in travell. We find the like expression, Isa. 28. 18, 19. They who had slighted the judgements of God, and said, when the overflowing scourge shall passe thorough, it should not come neare them, even these (saith God) shall be vext, when they doe but heare of a scourge co­ming neare: I will send a report, and it shall passe over morning by morning, and it shall travell by day and by night; and what shall be the effect of it? It shall be a vexation (saith the Lord) onely to understand the report. You shall not onely be vexed when the enemy is come, and thrusts a sword into your bowells, and fire into your houses, but you shall be vext at the noise of his coming, it shall be a vexation to you to heare the report. It is a great mercy to be delivered and hid from this scourge of the tongue, and this is promised him who feares God, (Psal. 112. 7.) No evill tydings shall make him afraid. A heart which hath trembled at the voice of God instructing him, shall not tremble at the voice of men reporting evill to him. Many a man is more afraid than hurt, and more perplexed with the hearing of evill tydings, then others are with seeing or feeling the evill. The Lord threatens Ely, to doe such a thing in Israel, and against his house, that both the [Page 353] eares of him that hears shall tingle, 1 Sam. 3. 11. But

Thirdly, Some translate thus. He shall be hidde when the Quidam, cum v [...]g [...]bitur Im­guae ut sit [...] pro [...] Drus. Merc. tongue wandreth or walketh about; for the same word which sig­nifies a scourge, by the alteration of a point in the Hebrew, sig­nifies to run to and fro. It is the word used in the first Chapter, where Satan reports himselfe, A Goer to and fro about the earth; There is an expression (Psalm. 73. 9.) sutable to this sense, though the Originall word be not the same; They set their mouth a­against the Heavens, and their tongue walketh thorow the earth. The tongues of many take long journeyes, while themselves sit still: Kings are said to have long hands, but many of their subjects have long tongues, and strike their brethren with them many hundreds of miles off; the tongue travels from towne to towne, from City to City, and scourgeth one here, and there another. And, while these men send their tongues about a wandring, to wound here and there, this and that mans credit, He is a happy man that can be hid from them.

Fourthly, Some of the Hebrew Doctors, retaining the fore-going sense of the Verbe, say, that by tongue, is meant Nations and peo­ple: Sunt qui per linguam hic intelligunt na­tiones q d. quum grassabuntur longè late (que) gentes & po­puli omnia (que) depopulabun­tur, &c. Drus. When the tongue, that is, when a Nation shall goe about, or march from place to place to destroy and over-runne a Land, then, at such a time, thou shalt be hid: It is frequent in Scripture to put tongues for Nations, or tongues and nations for the same, Rev. 7. 9. Chap. 17. 15. And there is a comfortable truth in the matter of this interpretation; That when all tongues or nations shall be ga­thered to destroy us, yet we shall be hid: As if it should be said (like that, Psal. 83. 6.) Though the Tabernacle of Edom and the Ishmaelites, of Moab and the Hagarens, Gebal, and Am­mon, and Amalek, the Philistines with the inhabitantes of Tyre, be confederate against thee: or, to take moderne names and Na­tions, though Irish and Spanish, French and Danes, &c. should at any time, wander from their own lands to invade thee; yet thou shall be hid when these tongues rove and wander, spoile and pil­la [...]e. The matter, I say, of this interpretation is a truth, and a very comfortable one, but I would not charge it upon this Text.

Fiftly, and most generally, and I conceive most truly, by the scourge of the tongue, is meant all, and all manner of calumnies and slanders, cursings or evill speakings, false witnesses and accusa­tions; and from these (the promise is) thou shalt be hid. It is [Page 354] said, Prov. 14. 3 That, In the mouth of the foolish is the rod of pride; not, that a foolish man will scourge pride, he loves it too well; but, because the pride of a foole, sets his tongue a scourging the wisest and the best: Maledicentia est famae homi­nis, quod flagel­lum corpori, nam laedit eam & interdam accid [...]t, hinc Grae [...]è [...] Dius. Evill words are the same to the credit of a man, that a scourge is to his back; when slanderers speake open­ly, then their tongue is compared to a sword, or an arrow by day; when secretly, then to a trap, or an arrow by night, to a serpent which comes behind; Gen. 49. and, as here, to Flagellum dicitur quod in scapulas impingitur, & à tergo laedit, ut non videas,—Metuentes patruae verbera linguae, Hor. 3. Cor. Od 11. Nam Patrui multo quam patres inco [...]rup­ [...]iores esse so lent in judican­dis & objur­gandis fratris fili [...]ū peccatis; a scourge which is prepared for the back, and is called in our language back-bi­ting: or we may call it back-beating. The scourge of the tongue, is all that ill, which the tongue can speak: And the Verbera à verbis, aut ver­ba á verberi­bus dicta sun [...]: quod au [...]es vox verbe [...]t. No­nius. Latin word for a word, agrees well to this sense; being derived (as Criticks ob­serve) from a word which signifies a stripe; or the word which signifies a stripe, from that which signifies a word: And we find; that they who defame or over-severely reprove others, are called (barely) Qui dè [...]actoriis verbis, famam alterius verberant. percussore▪ appellantur, etiam suppresso no­mine linguae, Pined. Nec sermone inutili conscientiam pe [...]utit, infi [...]morum, nec centumelio suo & garrulus, perdat eum, quem potuit medestia, & lenitate corrigere, Hier. in Titus 1. 7. strikers. And this (as some of the ancients note) accor­ding to Scripture language, in those two Apostolicall directions (1 Tim. 3. 3. and Tit. 1. 7.) where the Apostle gives the rule concerning a Bishop, that he must be no striker; This may be un­derstood of striking, not with the hand, (the Apostle could hardly think that quarrelsome spirits and sons of violence should be so much as admitted to a probation about that office) but striking with the tongue, by an undue, an overhasty, or an angry reproofe and censure. The great instrument of a Bishop or a Minister, is his tongue: but he must use his tongue, rather to heale than to wound; or if at any time, he useth it to wound, it should be in tendency unto, or in preparation for healing: Therefore, Let not a Bishop be a stri­ker, a striker with his tongue in passion, much lesse in spleene or for selfe ends.

Thus we see what we are to understand by the stroke or scourge of the tongue. But what is it, to be hid from that scourge? A word of that. Thou shalt be hid-

Not, as La [...]ebunt de­tractorem tua facta, de quibus possi [...], detrahen­di materiam sumere, Aquin. One, Thy actions shall be hid, which might be as matter for slander to work upon; nor, as Deficient de­tractorē ▪ firmae Another, though such actions appeare, yet slanderers shall want proofe, or sufficient witnesse shall not appeare against thee. But▪

First, We may take it thus; Thou shalt be hid from the scourge of the tongue, that is, the tenour of thy actions shall be so faire, and probationes & sufficientia in­dicia, Cajet. thy life so blamelesse, that malice it selfe shall not find, where to fa­sten an accusation.

Or secondly, When other men are slandered and reproached, thou shalt be free.

Or thirdly, Thou shalt be hid, that is, though occasion should be given to malice (and that our noblest and holiest actions use most to give) yet malicious men, shall not be able to come at thee, thy person shall be secured in a chamber of secrecy, and covered with a mantle of providentiall darknesse, while the light of thy good works dazles and troubles the eye of the world.

But rather fourthly, Thou shalt be hid, that is, Thou shalt be pa­troniz'd and defended, thou shalt be set right, and vindicated from all calumnies and false aspersions, The Lord will so take care of thy credit and reputation, that though many goe about to blemish it with lies and slanders, yet thy honour shall be saved, or the wounds of it healed, by causing thy righteousnesse to breake forth as the light, and thy just dealing as the noone day. Some charitable medicinable tongue shall lick thee whole, after all the stripes of those scourges or envenom'd scorpion-tongues: Thus, thou shalt be healed if smitten, or else thou shalt not be smitten, (Psal. 31. 20.) Thou shalt keepe them secretly in thy pavilion, from the strife of tongues. The words of the Psalmist, are an allusion to Kings, who being re­solved to protect their Favourites, against all the clamours and accu­sations of men; take them, as it were, into their own Pavil­lion, into their Bed-chamber and bosome, where none may touch Ad similitudi­nē regiae defen­sionis loquitur, qua s [...]. illi qui regibus chari sunt coram, in ipsis aulae pene­tralibus & in ipso regum con­spectu versan­tes defenduntur & securi vi­vunt, Muscul. in Psal. them. God also hath a pavillion, a secret hiding place for his Fa­vourites, where he preserves their credit and reputation untoucht, against all the blots and causelesse blemishes of malignant spirits, Thus they are hid from the strife of tongues. Hence his Saints and people are called, His stored, or his hidden ones, Psal. 83. 3. Ob­serve; first.

The tongue is a scourge.

The tongue is a terrible engine: The Scripture gives us variety of comparisons to set forth the evill, of an ill tongue. It is here called a scourge, and it is a scourge of many lashes or knotted cords, or rather stinging scorpions; scoffing is one, slander a second, false accusations a third. The former strictly taken, is a lye told any neighbour, and the latter is a lye told the Magistrate. The tongue [Page 356] (Psal. 52 2.) is called a sharpe rasor; Psal. 57. 4. it is compared to speares, and arrowes, and a sharpe Sword; and if at any time with much using, this Sword be blunted in the edge or point, the Scrip­ture speakes of whetting the tongue, Psal. 64. 3. It is as the sharpe arrowes of the mighty man, and coales of juniper, Psal. 120. 4. They bend their tongues like a bow, Jer. 9. 3. Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; ver. 8. In a word, It is a fire and a world of mischiefe, Jam. 3. 6. (Jer. 18. 18.) we reade of smiting with the tongue, and of devouring words, Psal. 52. 4. As there are devouring opinions, opinions, which not only hurt the judgements of men, but devoure their consciences, and eat up truth (as it were) at a bit, so there are devouring words, words that eat up a mans repu­tation, and devour his good name as bread. Slanderous mouthes l [...]ve the whitest bread, the finest of the wheate; A mans credit which hath not a branne in it, how sweet a morsell is it to such mouthes? Though, the truth is, every name, by how much the more pure and spotlesse it is, by so much the more deadly will it be in the stomacks of these devourers. A good name swallowed by an ill man, will (as Jonas did the Whale) make him (one time or other) Stomach-sick, if not conscience-sick, and he shall be forced to vomit it out safe againe.

It is a sad thing when (thus) the people of God are wounded and scourged by the tongues of wicked men; but I will tell you of a sadder scourging, that is, when the people and servants of God scourge one another with their tongues: I beseech you leave this work to wicked men, take not the scourge of the tongue out of their hands, let us, not only not slander, but, not speake hardly one of another. The ancient Christians in the Primitive times, were deepely wounded by the scourge of the tongue, what strange things did ungodly men feigne and then fasten on them? They reported them as black as hell, as if their holy meetings were not to wor­ship God, but to defile themselves with incest and uncleannesse; but among Christians themselves, we reade not of this scourge, at that time. No; Christians loved one another to the amazement of Heathens: They were so farre from this scourging or wounding of one another, that they were ready to be scourged, to be woun­ded, to be burned, to die one for another. This caused their Pa­gan persecuters to cry out, Behold how the Christians love one another? We are scourged by wicked ones, as They, O that we could love one another, as They. Sons of Belial have revived the [Page 357] ancient reproaches and accusations against the brethren, O, that we could revive the ancient imbraces and most endeared affections of the Brethren Observe, secondly,

It is a great mercy to be delivered from the Scourge of the tongue.

The Apostle speaks of it, as a wonderfull mercy, that he was de­livered out of the Mouth of the Lion (2 Tim. 4. 17.) Surely it is no ordinary mercy (though lying be very ordinary) to be delive­red out of the Mouth of a lyar. This is joyned in one promise, with deliverance from the most deadly instrumenrs of warre, Isa 54. 17. No weapon formed against thee shall prosper, that is no wea­pon of warre, neither Sword nor Speare shall hurt thee. Then fol­lowes, And every tongue that shall rise up against thee in judgement thou shalt condemne. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord. The tongue of a Ziba or of a Tertullus will devour and destroy, as bad as the Sword of a Caesar or a Pompey. The holy story tels us, what woefull work the tongue had made upon Joseph and Me­phibosheth, if the good providenee of God had not spoken a good word for them.

Lastly, Let me add one seasonable word of admonition, to these tongue scourgers; As the word is, They that smite with the sword, shall perish with the sword; so, they that smite with the tongue, shall perish with the tongue. The tongues of the Saints are in some sence, sharper and sorer scourges, then the tongues of wicked men. The word of God in their mouths, is a Two-edged Sword, yea sharper then any Two-edged Sword. A Prophet or a Minister of Christ, can strike as hard with his tongue, as (and infinitely harder, then) any Prophane wretch, or railing Rabshakeb in the world. Truth well set home, will wound deeper, than slander can. I (saith the Lord, Hos. 6. 5.) have hewed them by my Prophets, and slaine them by the words of my mouth. In the 11th of the Reve­lation, it is prophecied, That fire shall goe out of the mouths of the two Witnesses, and devour their enemies, vers. 5. That is, the word of their mouths, shall be as a fire to scorch and consume the gain saying world; and with this instrument their tongue (for that only is sutable for the work of Witnesses) they are said to have tormented those that dwell upon the earth, ver. 10. Some indeed are Sermon-proofe, and Word-proofe; They at present doe even laugh at all our spirituall Artillery, Let whole volleyes of threats be discharg'd upon them, let them be hackt and hewed all day long [Page 358] with the Sword of the Word, they feele it not, it may be they jeer at it, at least they regard it not. As they, Jer. 18. 18. conspiring against the Prophet, Come let us devise devices, &c. let us smite him with the tongue. And least any should say, if we smite him with the tongue, he will smite us againe; For these Prophets are notable at that weapon. To secure themselves, they resolve thus; Let us not give heed to any of his words. As if they had said, we know he will speake bigge words, and threaten us terribly, with Sword, and pestilence, and famine, and hell, &c. But let's arme our selves against him, and make no more of all, then of a Squibb or a pot-gun, then of a stabbe with a wooden dagger, or a charge with a Bull rush. Let us not give heed to any of his words. But let these know, though now they are hardned against the spiri­tuall scourge and sword, in the mouth of Christs Ministers, yet at the last Christ himselfe will smite them with the rod of his mouth; and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked. Isa. 11. 4. He once made a Scourge of cords, and whipt the buyers and sellers out of the Temple, he will at last make a Scourge of words, which shall whip all impenitents and unbelievers out of his presence into hell, where they shall gnash their teeth, and gnaw Those tongues, which have scourg'd his faithfull servants, with many stripes, only for doing or speaking his, their Masters, will.

Neither shalt thou be afraid of destruction, when it commeth.

The word Destruction signifies a confluence or meeting together [...] à radice [...] more praedonum & impetu Ho­stili vastari & de populari. of all kinds of evill; when evils breake in together, as theeves and robbers into a house to spoyle and take away all, Isa. 60. 18. Jer. 48. 3.

When such destruction comes, thou shalt have this priviledge, Not to be afraid of it. Not afraid, the word signifies any kinde of feare, holy fearing as well as naturall; here it is used for excessive, distracting feare. It is not meant, that a man shall be secure or senslesse, when destruction commeth, So to be fearlesse, is worse then to be reasonlesse. But this is the meaning, Thou shalt not be afraid; That is, thou shalt not bee dismayed with fear, thou shalt not be amazed or astonished with feare, thou shalt not be at thy wits end, much lesse at thy Faiths end, when destruction commeth. Feare is good in it's kind, yea it is an excellent grace; Some feare in time of destruction is the daughter of faith (Heb. 11. 7.) By Faith, Noah, being warned of God, of things not seen as yet, moved [Page 359] with feare, prepared an Ark to the saving of his house; He fears destruction savingly, whose fear moves him to prepare due means of safty. Such preparatory fears are holy fears, and well become the Saints, when destruction cometh. (Exod. 9. 20.) He that heard of the destruction coming, and feared the word of the Lord, made his servants and cattle flee into the houses; God would not have his people, when they hear destruction is com­ming, stand at the doore in a daring manner to meet it, and lay themselves open to it, no he would have them flee into the house, and enter into the chamber, and shut the doors about them, hiding them­selves, as it were for a little moment, untill the indignation be over­past, Isa. 26. 20.

The feare which God promiseth his people protection from, is unbelieving frare, or feare which is the daughter of despaire: Such as that, Isa. 7. 2. where, when a report came of destruction com­ming, it is said; That the heart of the King, and the heart of his people was moved as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind. They were so afraid, so unsetled and disorder'd within, that they knew not how to settle and order their affaires without. Such a feare the Prophet Jeremy threatens upon Pashur, Jer. 20. 3. The Lord hath not called thy name Pashur, but Magor-missabib; For thus saith the Lord, behold I will make thee a terrour to thy selfe, and to all thy friends; Feare round about, and fear within, this feare God promiseth to deliver his people from, in times of danger.

Observe hence.

The power and presence of God is able to uphold his people in the face of dangers, and in the presence of destruction.

They shall not be afraid of destruction, when it commeth: Suppose God doth not keepe the destruction off from them, yet he will keepe finking feares off from them. How terribly soever men looke upon them, they shall not be a terrour to them­selves, neither will God be a terrour to them. Many a man is his own Bugg-bear. And there is nothing can be so terrible to us, (except an angry God) as we may be to our selves. But he, to whom God is not a terrour, and to whom himselfe is not a terrour, will not be afraid of the King of Terrours. So long as we are at peace with God and our selves, destruction cannot come so fast, as consolation will. And destruction cannot carry that away, where­in consolation lies. The best part of the Saints estate, is out of the reach of destroyers. They can destroy houses and goods: They can [Page 360] carry away gold and silver, but they cannot destroy faith and hope; shey cannot carry away, grace or holinesse; They may burne your writings, and the evidences of your Lands and Tenements, but they cannot burne your evidences for Heaven, or weaken your te­nure and interests in Jesus Christ. Upon the wings of this assu­rance the Saints are carried beyond the borders of feare when de­struction comes into their borders, or death is breaking open their doores, and climbing up unto their windowes. Yea this assurance, (which carries them beyond the confines of feare) sets them down in a very comfortable place, in the Land of joy, or upon the moun­taines of delight. It is too little to say, They shall not be afraid, when destruction comes, for at destruction they shall laugh: As Eli­phaz undertakes with his next breath.

Vers. 22. At destruction and famine, thou shalt laugh; neither shalt thou be afraid of the Beasts of the Earth.

23. For thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field; and the Beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee.

In the former words, we had a promise of redemption from fa­mine and from feare at the comming of destruction. Here both the mercy and the promise are heightned, or the promise is made yet more mercifull; At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh. It is a high priviledge to be redeem'd from famine, and not to be afraid of destruction; but to laugh at these is the highest priviledge. But is it not a sin to laugh at these? And if so, how will it be any priviledge at all? I (saith the wise man, Eccl. 2. 2.) said of laughter it is madd, and of mirth, what doth it? And is not this madd laugh­ter, to laugh at destruction, and to be merry in famine? The Pro­phet vehemently reproves joy in sad times, (Isa. 22. 12, 13.) and brands it for an iniquity, that shall not be purged from them, till they die; And can it then be commendable to rejoyce in famine, &c. It is comely for man to be merry, when God is angry? And to be rejoycing, when the Lord is destroying? To cleare this I shall open the sence of the Text, and shew, that this Laughter is nei­ther [...] [...]aē quod [...] Sumitur in bo­nam vel in ma­lam partem, pro loci ratione: ri­sus gaudij, risus contemptus. sinne nor madnesse, but the holinesse and sobriety of the Saints.

At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh.

The word is ordinarily used for laughing; whence Isaac hath his name, The sonne of the promise was called Isaac, because A­braham [Page 361] laughed, or because he rejoyced at the promise or birth of his sonne, especially at the promise of His birth, who was to be the joy and desire of Nations, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, referring to this act of Abraham, tels the Jewes, Joh. 8. 56. Your Father A­braham rejoyced to see my day, he saw it and was glad. To laugh in Scripture is taken two waies.

Sometimes in a good sense; and

Sometimes in an ill sense,

In a good sense, and so, To laugh is an outward expression of sound inward joy and true comfort; To laugh is an act proper to man. There cannot be true and solid joy (and so, not this effect of it, laughing) where there is not true solid reason. Even passion (strictly taken) is founded in reason. In the 29. of this book ver. 24. Job describing the great prosperity of his former daies, saith, If I laughed on them, they believed it not. Job was a man of that esteem and veneration, that though he expressed in his gesture or countenance, a kind of familiarity, and how well he was pleased, yet the people did so much reverence him, and his piety and unspot­ted justice did so over-awe them, that they suspected still he might observe somewhat amisse in them.

Secondly, to laugh, is used for scorning and deriding. In the 39 of this book v 7. Laughter is ascribed unto the wild Asse, improperly; He (sc. the wild. Asse) scornes (or laughs at) the multitude of the City. And (Psal. 2. 4.) when the Princes and the people gather themselves together, to take counsell against the Lord and against his Christ; He that sitteth in heaven shall laugh, and the Lord shall have them in derision. That is, the Lord (in a most holy manner) scornes or derides the counsels and practises of wicked men, Man is never in so sad a condition, as when God laughs at him.

Again, Laughter proper to man, is either sinfull and reproove­able, or holy and commendable. Sinfull laughter is that which a­rises.

First, from unbeliefe or weaknesse of faith: Such was the laugh­ter of Sarah (Gen. 18. 12.) when the Angel brought his message that Sarah should have a sonne, Sarah, heard it, as she was in the Tent▪doore, and the Text saith, Sarah laughed: The ground of her laughter was unbeliefe, she thought it an impossible thing, for her to have a son (as a man will laugh at a thing you tell him. when he thinks it impossible to be done. That her laughter was from unbeliefe, is plaine, from the Angels reproving question in the [Page 362] next words; Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, shall I of a Jurety beare a child, which am old? Is any thing too hard for the Lord? As if he had said, surely Sarah thinkes the Lord hath out promis'd his own power to performe.

Secondly, Sinfull laughter ariseth from contempt, or slighting of counsell, and carnall security in times of danger (2 Chron. 30. 10.) when Hezekiah sent messengers to Ephraim and Manasseh to warn them to come up to the house of the Lord, to keepe the Passeover, it is said, That they laughed the messengers to scorn and mocked them; they laughed, slighting and contemning this admonition, thinking themselves safe and well enough, though they came not up to that solemne Passeover.

Thirdly, Sinfull laughter arises from pride and selfe-confidence, (Hab. 1. 10.) The Prophet describes the proud Chaldeans, in­vading Judah; thus, They shall sc [...]ffe at the Kings, and Princes shall be a scorn unto them, and they shall deride every strong-hold. They shall come up with such an army, with such an arm of flesh, as all flesh must fall downe and yeeld unto.

Lastly, There is a sinfull laughter, springing from sensuality, and excesse of creature contentments. Such laughter Christ threatens, Luk. 6. 25. Woe to you that are full, woe to you that laugh now: That is, woe to you that laugh, because of your creature-fulnesse.

Laughter, which is good and commendable, hath such roots, as these.

First, it springs up from faith, such was the laughter of Abra­ham (Gen. 17. 17.) when he heard the promise, that he should have a sonne, the text saith, Abraham fell upon his face and laugh­ed: That the laughter of Abraham was from faith, is cleare from the Apostle, Rom. 4. 19. affirming, that, He not being weak in faith, considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadnes of Sarahs wombe, he staggered not at the promise of God through unbeliefe, &c. Abra­ham laughed out his faith, not (as Sarah) his unbelief. Therfore also Christ saith (as was toucht before) Abraham rejoyced to see my day, he saw it, and was glad: In the promise of his sonne, he saw the Promised se [...]d, in whom all the Nations of the earth should be bles­sed. This sight of the day of Christ, in that prospective of the pro­mise, drew it [...]eare to the old-mans heart (though it were farre off) and made him glad.

Secondly, Commendable laughter comes from holy courage, [Page 363] and well grounded confidence; well temper'd magnanimity, and Christian heroicalnesse of spirit, lifts us so farre above dangers and fears, that we laugh at them.

And then, there is a laughter in dangers grounded upon assurance of deliverance from, or support in dangers. A man that sees a great Ridehis ventos hoc munere te­ctus. & imbres. Mart. storme coming, laughs at it, knowing where to goe to shelter presently, where to get a warme house over his head, The Pilot knowing he hath a strong Ship, and good Tackling, laughs at the windes. In that sense [not to feare] is used (Prov. 31. 21.) where it is said of the wise woman. She is not afraid of the snow for her houshold; If the snow and cold weather come, she doth not feare it, she can laugh at the snow; Why? For all her houshold are cloathed with scarlet, or double cloth, she hath made such pro­vision against cold weather, that she feares neither frost nor snow.

Now, the text, (when it is said, At famine thou shalt laugh,) is not meant of laughter, springing either from unbeliefe, or pride or self-confidence, or sensuality or senslesnesse; as if he should not care what God did in the world, let God doe what he would, he would laugh. As that proud Emperour said (not only as one be­fore [...] him, when I am dead, but) while I live, let heaven and earth be mingled together, I care not, scorning and contemning what could come. But this laughter comes from strength of faith, from holy courage, and well grounded confidence; from an assurance of shel­ter, safeguard and protection from, or support in, the greatest dan­gers, even in famine and destruction: He fixes on such a promise In vastitate ita eris munitus, ac de tua salute se­curus, ut ridere possis, etiam s [...] famescas, non te enecabit fames, verum Deus sue te consolationi [...] papulo ita refi­ciet, ut ridere possis. Ipsa te fames red [...]et saturum; & cā ­ [...]abis, non secus ac si tibi plenus esset venter. Pined. as this, Psal. 37. 19. They shall not be ashamed in the evill time, and in the dayes of famine, they shall be satisfied. The soule of a believer sees salvation in destruction, food in famine, he hath wine well refined to drinke, marrow and fatnesse to feed upon, when the world knowes not how to give him (or will not give him) a dry crust, or a cup of cold water. He sees a hiding place, when all others lye open to the danger, he sees a place of refuge, a covert from the raine and from the storme, when others stand naked un­der them. The summe of all is; A godly man sees himselfe so pro­tected in dangers, so provided for against all wants, he sees in the promises such a Magazin of armes, such stores of bread, that he feares no weapon form'd against him, and feeds, when no table is spread for him; Danger secures, destruction saves, and famine fat­tens him, that is, in danger, destruction and famine, he knowes [Page 364] whither to goe for food, salvation and safety, even unto God, who is all this to him, and will be more, if he need it Upon these grounds it is, that the text saith, At famine and destruction he shall laugh. Observe hence,

A godly man, a true believer, is not onely not afraid of outward evills when they come, but through faith he is above and triumphs over them.

Not to be afraid of faime and destruction when they come, is too low for his spirit, He shall laugh when they come. Hence the Apo­stles exulting language, We glory in tribulation, we are exceeding joyous in all our tribulations. And to this sence we may interpret that of Peter speaking of the sufferings of the Saints, 1 Epi. 4. 14. The Spirit of glory resteth upon them; that is, a spirit of glory­ing and holy rejoycing, whereby the soul is carried up (as it were) upon Eagles-wings, above and beyond reproaches. All evills lie below a believer, when he is lifted up with this spirit of glory. This spirit of glory resting upon us through him that loved us, makes us more then conquerours over tribulation, distresse, persecu­tion, famine, nakednesse, perill or sword, Rom. 8. 35. More than conquerours? Who can expresse, how much that is? No tongue can tell what it is to be more then a conquerour; when Christ would advance the exceeding greatnesse of that reward, which Givers shall receive, Luke 6. 38. He saith not barely, Give, and it shall be given you good measure; but you shall have it pressed down, and yet more, shaken together; that is not all neither, but you shall have it running over. Now a measure will runne over, as long as you will poure, there is no stint, no bounds to that gift, which shall be given running over; A vessell will run over con­tinually, poure as long as you will: So here, you shall not onely have a conquest, but more then a conquest, and what that is, is as much and more than all our thoughts are able to comprehend. Hence also the Apostle speaking of that great enemy, the last ene­my Death (1 Corinth. 15. 55.) brings in the believing soule in a kinde of holy triumph, laughing at, and even jearing death, in the sence of the Text, O death where is thy sting? As if a man having disarmed his enemy, should say, now Sir, where's your sword? where's your pistoll? Christ hath disarmed death, taken away its sting; now the believer may laugh in the face of death, Oh death, thou thoughtest to make us all smart, where is thy sting? thou thoughtest thy selfe a conquerour, able to devoure [Page 365] and subdue us all, but where is thy victory? Such is the laughter here meant. And in the same sense, Leviathan the mightiest of li­ving creatures, that sea monster (to whom upon the earth there is not the like, he is made without fear, Chap. 41. 33.) is said to laugh at the shaking of the speare (Job 41. 29.) He is so armed with impenitrable scales, that, shake a speare at him, he laughs at you; it is an allusion to those, that are armed with proofe, they feare neither sword nor shot: The truth is, a beleever is shot-free, shake the speare at him, shake famine, shake destruction at him, threaten him with this or with that, he laughs at all, because he hath armour of proofe, wherein he may safely trust; He hath a shield, a shield of faith, which will quench even the fiery darts of Satan, much more then the fiery dangers of the world.

The Histories of the Primitive Church, are full of this holy laugh­ter, and heroicall magnanimity of the Saints, grapling with the greatest evils. How did those renowned Martyrs, even baffle death, and deride their torments (from this principle of faith in Christ) conquering them, not slighting them (from a principle of selfe-neg­lect) When Polycarpe was threatned to be torne in peeces with the teeth of wild beasts, let them come, saith he, and grind me, I shall make very good bread, so that the very tormentors were more tormented with the holy scorne and laughter of suffering Chri­stians, than the Christians were with the torments which they suffered. In 2 Sam. 2. 14. When Abner and Joab, the two great Generals met, Abner saith unto Joab, Let the young men arise and play before us; the sport was to fight, and fighting unto death, and yet these stout Souldiers being above feare, call it playing one with another; It is the word here in the text (let them come and laugh together before us) As if these young men were of such courage, that they could laugh at death, and goe to killing one ano­ther as if they were to goe to play with one another. Surely there is little reason for such courage; killing of men is no laughing mat­ter, no matter of sport; for, as Abner said unto Joab, not long af­ter (vers. 26.) shall the sword devoure for ever, knowest thou not, that it will be bitternsse in the end? There is little cause to account the beginning of that a sport, which will be bitternesse in the end: But when the Saints are to joyne in the deadliest battell, or to meet with the deadliest death for Christ, or from the chast­ning hand of Christ, they have reason enough to account it a sport, and to laugh at destruction (in this sense cleared) because they [Page 366] know it will be sweetnesse and comfort in the end: Valour some­times laughs at danger, much more may faith, (Psal. 68. 12, 13.) Though ye have lyen among the pots, yet shall we be as the wings of a dove covered with silver, and her feathers with yellow gold: This is the confidence of the Saints, when they lye among the pots, or among the pot-ranges (as some interpret it) where the scullions lye, and are besooted and black'd over, at the fire of affli­ctions till they looke like very scullions, that yet, they shall be gilded over soone after. Or it may be understood of the bounds and limits of the enemies Country: and so it is a description of great danger, for they who lye upon the borders of an enemies Country, are in continuall feare of an assault; This the Greeke seemes to favour, rendring it thus; Though we have laine between the inheritances, or the lots, sc. our own and the enemies; either [...]. Sept. Ainsworth. way the sense reaches this point fully; Though Beleevers lye among the pots, or ncarest dangers, yet they are assured that they shall have wings, as the wings of a Dove, which are covered with silver, and her feathers with yellow gold. There is gold and silver in the eye of faith, while there is nothing but blacknesse and death in the eye of sense; yea, faith assures them, that, they shall be white as snow in Salmon (as it follows in that Psalme) that is, they shall have whitenesse after blacknesse, or light in the midst of darknesse; Salmon signifies darke, duskish or obscure: for, it was a hill full of pits, holes, and glins, very darke and dangerous for passengers; but when the snow was upon it, it was white and glistering; now saith he, they shal be like Salmon in the snow, though black in them­selves, yet white, lightsome and glorions, either through pardon of sin, or victory over their enemies, to both which, whitenesse hath re­ference in Scripture.

Againe, In that it is said, At destruction and famine thou shalt Non solum sin­gulas arumnas superabit, sed omnium illa­rum in unum coeuntiam ag­men. Integrum ex omnibus ex [...]rcitum f [...]gabi [...]. laugh; as from that word, laughing, we see what spirits the Saints have in troublesome times, So, inasmuch as he gathers together and rally's all the scattered troopes of afflictions, to charge at once upon a beleever; and yet concludes, At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh; Observe, That

A godly man laughs at, or is above all evils, though brought a­gainst him at once.

It hath been said, That Hercules could not match two: here are two, Destruction and famine, overmatcht by one; bring whole legions and armies of troubles to encounter a Saint, he overcomes [Page 367] them all: He famishes famine, and destroyes destruction it selfe. The Apostle, Rom. 8. 35. musters up (as it were) all evils toge­ther into a body, and dares any or all to battell, with a beleever, Who shall separate us from the love of God? shall tribulation, or distresse, or persecution, or famine, or nakednesse, or perrill, or sword? which of these shall undertake the challenge, or will you bring any more? then, come life, or death, Angels, or principa­lities, or powers, things present, or things to come, height, or depth, or any other creature: none of these single, nor all of these joyned, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Every heightned Saint is a spirituall Go­liah, who in the name of the living God, bids defiance to this huge host, and they all run and tremble before him. Rejoyce (saith the Apostle, James 1. 2.) when you fall into divers tempata­tions; A beleever hath joy, not only when he grapleth with a single temptation, but let there come many, divers temptations, variety of temptations, variety for kind, and multitude for number, yet he rejoyceth in the middest of all.

Neither shalt thou be affraid of the beasts of the earth.

Having thus lifted a godly man above the afflicting reach of those two great evils, famine and destruction, want of good things, and spoiling of their goods; he proceeds to instance another great evill, wherein a godly man is exempt from, and set above fear; Nei­ther shalt thou be afraid of the beasts of the earth.

Beasts of the earoh.] [...] a radice [...] vita, vivents, bestia fera. The root of that word signifies life, and so any living creature, especially a wild beast; because they are so active and full of life, therefore they are named from life.

And these are called, the beasts of the earth.

First, Because beasts are produced from the earth, and the earth received a charge to produce them, Gen. 1. 24, 25. And God said, let the earth bring forth the living creature, after his kind, and God made the Beast of the earth after his kind.

Or secondly, Because Beasts have nothing but earth to live upon; as men whose portion is only in creatures, are called men of the world, or men of the earth.

The word for ( [...] Comple­ctitur totum terrarum orbē tum habitabi­lem, tum qui non est habita­bliis, deductum volunt a verbo [...] curra [...]e, vel quia coelum perpetuo rotatu circa terram currit, vel qu [...]d omnia anima­lia currant su­per faciem ter­rae. earth) signifies the whole earth, habitable or in­habitable; And though the earth stand still, yet this word is derived (say some) from running: either, because the heavens runne round aboui the earth, with a continuall rotation or motion; or because [Page 368] all creatures, men and beasts, move or run upon the face of the earth. Though others deduce it from a word which signifies to de­sire, Alii à verbo [...] i. e. vo­lui [...], con [...]upivi [...] deductum vo­luat eo quod terra jugiter appetat afferre wish, or will a thing, because the earth is perpetually desirous of bringing forth fruit, for the use and helpe of man. But it is not agreed on, what we are to understand, by the beasts of the earth.

First, Some take the words improperly, and so the beasts of the earth, are interpreted men; A company or society of men, and these in a double sense. For the word notes sometimes a company of men in a good sense, and sometimes a company of men in an ill sense. I shall give you an instance of both, for the clearing of this text-

It signifies men, or a company of men in a good sense, Psal. 68. 10. where speaking of that raine of liberalities, (that is, blessings of all sorts) which God sent upon his inheritance, to confirme and refresh it, he saith, Thy Congregation hath dwelt therein, Thy camp or leagure, thy host or troop dwelt there; (so 2 Sam. 23. 13.) which the vulgar translates, Thy beasts, and the Greeke, Thy living Animalia tua habitabunt in ijs, Vulg. Sept. [...]. creatures dwelt therein: The same word is used (and some ap­prehend in allusion to this Psalme) Rev. 4. 6. Chap. 5. 8, 9 in those mysticall descriptions of Christ and his Church: In this sense it suites not at all with the promise of the text, These beasts are not to be feared, but honoured and loved; mans greatest spirituall com­forts on earth, are found in the society of these beasts.

But commonly this word, referred unto men, signifies an associa­tion of wicked men; men of the earth, worse (many of them) then the beasts of the earth: These are spoken of in the same Psalme, ver. 30. Rebuke the company of speare men, (or Archers) [...] The rout or crue of the Cane, that is, men that beare reeds, or canes, whereof speares and arrowes were wont to be made; there­fore the company of speare-men or archers, are called a company with reeds: The word by us rendred company, is, the beasts of the reeds, those men that are like beasts, savage, cruell and bloody, these are as bruits and beasts of the earth; so they are descipher'd in the next verse, The multitude of the buls, with the calves of the people. And we find the word signifying, a company of wicked ones, and a company of Saints in the same verse Ps. 74. 19. O deliver not the soule of thy turtle dove unto the multitude of the wicked; The Hebrew is unto the company of the beasts; Forget not the Con­gregation (or the beasts) of thy poore for ever; there the same [Page 369] word is taken (as in Psal. 68. 10) for a company of Saints, or the poor people of God. In the Scripture of the new Testament, it is frequent to shadow wicked men under the names of beasts, beasts of the earth: so that of Paul hath been taken (1 Cor. 15. 32.) If I have fought with beasts at Ephesus after the manner of men, with beastly men, cruell men, men like unto beasts in their qualities and dispositions: though others understand it of his being cast unto the beasts, to fight with them, which was a cruelty those persecuting times exercised against the Christians. So (1 Tim. 4. 16.) Paul saith, he was delivered out of the mouth of the Lion: Nero that cruell tyrant, is supposed to be the Lion, the beast of the earth he aimeth at. And the Apostle, Tit. 1. 1. gives this cha­racter of the Cretians, they are evill beasts. If we take it here in this sence, it is a truth, and a very comfortable truth, that godly men shall be delivered from the fear of beastly and cruell men, or as the Apostle calls them, unreasonable or absurd men; who have not faith.

But rather understand here beasts of the earth properly, for those fierce and cruell creatures hurtfull to man. Once man had power and dominion over all the creatures; the wildest beasts were tame to him in his state of innocency; till he rose up and re­belled against God, the creatures were subject unto him; but man rebelling against God, the creatures rebelled against man: hence it is, that man naturally is surprised with fear at the approach and sight of strong and cruell beasts; and therefore it is here spoken as a speciall mercy and priviledge of the godly, that they shall not be afraid of the beasts of the earth.

The beast of the earth are hurtfull to us three ways;

First naturally, many beasts by nature are very dreadfull to man, as the Lion, the Bear, the Wolfe, and such other fierce, strong and bloody beasts.

Scondly, Tame beasts, such as we daily use and subdue to our service, are often by accident hurtful to us; The Horse and the Ox, have many times been destructive to their owners.

Thirdly, (which I conceive is the thing chiefly aimed at here) beasts hurt judicially, in a way of wrath from God; There are di­vers places in the book of God, wherein God threatens to arme the creatures, against those who sin against him, and that when his people should forget their duties, the beasts should forget their subjection. Deut. 32. 24. I will send the teeth of beasts upon them. [Page 370] And Jer. 15. 3. I will appoint over them foure kinds, saith the Lord, the sword to slay, and the dogs to teare, and the fowles of the heaven, and the beasts of the earth, to devoure and destroy. You see God can have an army any where if he pleaseth, an army of dogs to destroy, an army of fowles of the aire, an army of the beasts of the earth, to subdue a rebellious people. And Ezek. 14. 21. This is one of the four sore judgements that God denounceth against Jerusalem, The sword, and the famine, and noysome beasts, and the pestilence. Thus in a judiciall manner they were very ter­rible and dreadfull, and so were numbred among the sorest evills or judgements which God sent upon a Nation, for their wickednesse. To all or any of these wayes, this promise may be inlarged. Thou shalt not be afraid of the naturall cruelty, the casuall hurtfulnesse, or the judiciary rage of beasts, when sent by God with commission to punish the beastlinesse of men.

How this cometh to passe, that beasts of the earth hurt not godly men, is said down in the next verse, which I shall a while open, and then give you some Notes and Observations from both together.

Vers 23. For thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field, and the beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee.

This verse containes the reason, why he should not be afraid of the beasts of the field; and here is somewhat more got into the rea­son, than was before in the promise; the ground of the promise is higher, and carried farther than the promise it selfe. The promise was, to be delivered from the fear of beasts; and that thou mayest be certaine of it, know God will not suffer so much as a stone to do thee hurt; thou shalt be at league not onely with the beasts of the earth, but with the stones of the field.

Thou shalt be in league] The word is frequently used in the [...] à radice [...] [...]legii quia e­legamur perso­nae inter quas & res & conditio [...]es propter q [...]as foed [...]s ini­tur. Buxt. old Testament, to signifie, that solemne gracious covenant of re­conciliation between God and man, established in the blood of Christ.

A league or covenant is a very solemne act, an act of reason and of the highest reason, an act of judgement and deepest deliberati­on: therefore it may be doubted how a league can be entred with stones, which have no life, or with beasts which have no reason. We read (Gen. 31. 41.) of a league or covenant made at or up­on an heap of stones, between Jacob and Laban; but this is [Page 371] very strange and unheard of, to make a league with a heape of stones.

For the claring of this, we must enquire into two things;

  • 1. What these stones are.
  • 2. What this league with stones doth import.

First, For the Stones: There are divers opinions about them, and many Interpreters have exceedingly stumbled at these stones: Some change these stones into men, strong men, or the strongest of men. That of Job in the next Chapter, hath some allusion to it, ver. 12. Is my strength the strength of stones? A strong man is strong, as a stone.

The Chaldee Paraphrast, understands by stones, the Law, which was written in stones. Thou shalt be in league with the stones, that is, the Law written in tables of stone shall never hurt thee. But that (as to this text) is a meare conceit, though (in it selfe) a great truth, and our greatest comfort, that believers are at league with those Law-stones, which left in power and hostility, would have broken all man-kind to pieces, and ground them to power. Christ hath made peace for us with the Law; The Law had a quar­tell at us, and the Law would have been upon us with an everlasting war, if Christ had not setled our peace by satisfying the Law; Sto­ning to death, had been the death of us all, if Christ had not made a league for us with these stones.

Thirdly, Others interpret these stones by a Metanomy of the continent for the thing contained, Thou shalt be at league with the stones of the field, with the rocks or rocky places, that is, thou shalt be at league with those creatures, or with those beasts, which lie among the stones, and have their dens about hollow rocks: and so they make the latter branch [and the beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee] to be exegeticall, giving us the exposition of the former, or shewing what is meant by being at league with the stones of the field; Thou shalt be at league with the stones of the field, that is, with the beasts who make their dens, and their holes, and their hiding places anomg the stones of the field. This is a good sence of the words.

But leaving the former, with some other apprehensions about these stones, I shall take these stones properly, and so they will fall under foure considerations, all which give light to the clearing of this text, and the manner of our league with stones.

First, As naturally scattered upon the face of the earth, so hin­dring [Page 372] travellers, or endangering a man in hast upon his way. One part of Arabia, was called Arabia Petraea, or the stony, because it was full of stones, and so uneasie either for tillage or travell.

Stones are so dangerous to the foot, that the Latine word is de­rived from hurting the foot; Hence those Scripture-expressions, Lapis à laedendo pede nomen ha­bet. A stumbling stone, and a rock of offence, because men are so apt to stumble at stones. And both these are applyed to Christ in a figure, he is called A stumbling stone, and a rock of offence. Christ in him­selfe is the most precious and elect foundation-stone to build on, but he is the most sore and dangerous stone to stumble on: To be in league and covenant with that living stone, is the highest mercy.

Secondly, These stones as they lie naturally hidden in the bow­ells of the earth, or under the earth, are a trouble to the Husband­man in tilling the ground, in plowing and sowing, and they often endanger the breaking of his plow, and hinder the rooting and growth of the seed sowne.

Thirdly, consider these stones as artificially laid together for the making of a wall or mound to fence and part field from field, or both from the common fields and high-ways.

Fourthly, Consider these stones as artificially and industriously placed for marks and boundaries, to distinguish private mens lands, or the precincts of such and such countries, which are commonly called Lapides ter­minales. Mark stones, or Boundary-stones; as also stones set in roads or high-ways, for the direction of Travellers, pointing which way to goe to eminent Towns or Cities. Of such a stone we read (1 Sam. 20. 19.) when Jonathan bad David stay at the stone Eziel, that is, as we put in the Margin of our Bibles, the stone that shew­eth the way, or the Lapides via­torii. way-stone. These boundary-stones, or way-stones to direct travellers, were famous in antiquity; Insomuch that among the Romoni Deum habeban [...] quem Terminu [...]n vo­cabant. Is Deus finum erat, Pig. l. 1 de Civ. Dei cap. 23. Lact. l. 1. c. 20. Heathen, They were worshipped as a God, or Numen, as divers of the Christan Fathers have observed in their learned reports of Heathenish idolatry. Which also their own Termini, sive lapis sive es de­fossus in agro, Stipes, ab anti­quis, [...]u quo (que) nu­men habes. Ov. primo Fast.—Omnis erit sine [...]eli [...]igiosus ager— Po­ets have elegantly described, both in their constitution and uses; giving those stones a charge faithfully to testifie, Et seuve meri­bus, seu te pul sabere rastris, Clamato tuus est hic ager, ille tu vs. This is your land, and this is yours. And they break out into the commendation of the integrity of these witnesses, whom no threats could terrifie, or bribes corrupt to speak a lie, or conceal the truth.

Now consider the other terme, what it is to be in league with stones, in any of, or in all these acceptations.

In generall we know, that to be in league with stones, is an impro­per [Page 373] or allusive speech: Stones are not capable of the formalities of a league, when we are in league or covenant with God or man, so with stones; these two things are made out to us.

1. That God or man will do us no hurt; A covenant or league takes off the actings of hostility. Whatsoever a man is in covenant with, he fears no damage from. Presumptuous sinners having made a covenant with hell, and an agreement with death, build their confidence of indemnity upon the strength of it. When the over-flow­ing scourge shall passe through, it shall not come neare us, Isa. 28. 15. A man that is in league with the devill, believes the devill will doe him no wrong.

2. A league imports, that we may expect to receive good, pro­tection, benefits and blessings either from God or man, according to the Articles of covenant agreed to, and sealed respectively. These two assurances we have by a league. And when it is said here, that a godly man is in league with the stones of the field, both these are to be understood. It is as much as to say, The stones of the field shall not annoy him; yea, the stones of the field shall be a benefit or a friend to him. Man is said to be in league with stones, when he re­ceives the effect of a league from stones. Taking it in this generall sence, we may apply it unto those four particular sences of senseless stones before mentioned.

First, As stones are naturally scattered upon the face of the earth, the promise imports thus much; that such stones shall not hurt or annoy him in his walks or travells. This promise we have expresse­ly (Psal. 91. 11.) He shall give his Angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy wayes, they shall beare thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone. This is the league with stones, Stones shall not annoy thee in thy way, thou shalt not stumble or fall to break thy bones, or bruise thy body upon these stones. The devill in his combat with Christ, misapplyeth this promise of a league with the stones (Mat. 4. 6.) Tempting him to cast himselfe down from a pinacle of the Temple, for it is written, He shall give his Angels charge concerning thee, and in their hands they shall bear thee up, least at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone; As if he had said, a godly man hath this assurance from his league with the stones, that he shal receive no harm from them, therefore trust God, and in confidence of this promise, Cast thy self down. So here is the first sence, Thou shalt be at league with the stones of the field; that is, thou shalt not be hurt by those stones, as thou travellest or walkest.

Secondly, Take the stones as they lie hidden in the earth, then to be at league with them, hath this sence. First, that in tilling the earth, stones should not trouble or hinder that work. God shall so order it, that though thou plowest among stones, yet thou shalt till thy ground successefully. The stony ground shall be fruit­full ground. In that Parable of a vineyard (Isa. 5. 1) God is plea­sed to manifest his care of making it fruitfull, by this act among o­thers, I gathered out the stones thereof, ver. 2, noting that stones are naturally great impediments to fruitfulnesse. We rea [...] (Mat. 13. 5.) how the seed, which fell upon the stony ground, sprung up quickly and withered as quickly; Stony ground naturally cannot feed or bring forth fruit to maturity. It is then a great priviledge, thus to be in league with the stones of the field, that though we sow among stones, yet we shall have a plentifull Harvest. When Job described the days of his prosperity (Chap. 29. 6) he saith, The Rocke powred him out rivers of oyle: To have oyle out of rocks, is like having corne out of the stones, both noting things succeeding Justo mollescūt saxa, im [...]iis ve­ro te [...]rae pulvis mollissimus la­pidescet. beyond their naturall principles, and our common expectation. When the Baptist would shew how God can work beyond all the possibilities of nature or reason, he saith to the Jewes, Even of these stones God can raise up children unto Abraham, (Mat. 3.) There is somewhat of a miracle in it, to raise up bread to a man out of stones; that is, to make rocky land, a fertile soile. God threat­ned his people, that he would make the earth to be iron under them; that is, the earth which was ordinarily fruitfull, shall yield you no more fruit, then iron; And on the other side he promises, That they shall suck honey out of the rocke, and oyle out of the flin­ty rocke, Deut. 32. 13. Honey out of the rock; That is, honey of Bees, hiving themselves in rocks; or (as others) honey fruits, as Dates, &c. which grow on Palme trees (as oyle on Olive­trees) in rocky places. Hereby, the Lord assured his people of a­boundant Aisnw. on Deu. plenty; For whereas rocks and stones are usually barren, he would make those places fruitfull to Israel. They should have oyle out of the rock in Canaan, as well as water out of a rock in the wildernesse. We are surely in league with those rocks and stones of the fields, which send us such Presents as these, bread and water, honey and oyle.

Thirdly, Take these Stones, as artificially laid together, and so, Nunquam dis­solvetur mac­ria, non dissiliet lapis ex sepe, ne­mo furabitur, ne no Insiliet in agros tuos. Thou shalt be in league with them, is thus to be understood, Those walls and mounds of stone, shall be as the keepers and watch­men [Page 375] of the field; they shall preserve thy corn and thy cattell from annoyance. To this sense some joyne the former words with these, Thou shalt not be afraid of the beasts of the earth, for the stones of the field, which lie in the wals and fences, shall be-friend thee, and keepe them out. When God would shew his intendment to de­stroy and lay waste his vineyard; he expresses it by pulling down the wall, as before he had express'd his care to protect it, by buil­ding of a wall, Isa. 5. 2. I fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof; which we may understand thus, I gatherd out the stones (and as it is usuall) made a fence of them; and had the vineyard brought forth fruit, it had also been in league with these stones, that is, the stones of the wall had kept out the wild-beasts, or any annoyance from them; but being fruitlesse, the league with those stones was broken: I (saith the Lord, ver. 5.) will breake downe the wall thereof, and it shall be troden downe. So that, in this sense, to be at league with the stones of the field, is as much as to say, the stone-wall or the stone-fence which is made about thy field, shall stand to protect and maintain thy land, thy fruits and cattell, from the incursions of wild beasts, from spoyling and treading down Facere pactum cum lapidibus agri, est paci­ficè vivere cum proximo, item securus esse, quod nullos ter­minos agri sui transiliturus sit, ac si cum lapi­dibus Termina­libus pepigisset: ipsi (que) lopides pactum ini [...]um servarent, nec aliter ac si ra­tione valentes incursores, aut transgressores etiam verbo fu­garent, Pined. Termini ag [...]orū tuo [...]um à nemi­ne violentur, nemo transgre­dietur. by any.

Fourthly, take these Stones for land-marks or for way-marks, for boundary-stones, or for directory-stones; and then the sense may be thus conceived, Thou shalt be at league with the stones of the field; that is, no man shall come within thy bounds, none shall remove thy land-marks, or invade thy estate, those Stones shall firmly distinguish thine inheritance, thou shalt have no con­troversie arising, which is thine, or what is thy possession. As if an agreement had formally bin made with these stones, to keepe off all intruders upon their Masters inheritance, and accordingly the stones in pursuance of that agreement (like so many hired ser­vants) should faithfully witnesse for their Master, and chide away all who would doe him wrong. (1 Sam. 7. 12.) Samuel set up a stone as a boundary of the conquest and victories, which the Lord had given the children of Israel against the Philistines, He set up a stone, and called it Eben-Ezer, or the stone of helpe. Adding the reason, Hitherto hath the Lord helped us; As if he had said, here is a Stone of remembrance, how God hath helped us, and that stone seemed to speake thus much to Israel, Keepe and hold what ye have gotten, let not the Philistines set a foot (unrevengd) over or beyond this stone. So then, in this sense, to be in league [Page 376] with the stones of the field, is a promise of keeping our inheritances free from invasion and confusion, that we shall know what is ours, and that no enemy shall take it from us.

It was a great sin to remove the land-marks and boundaries, and a great punishment was threatned against any, who should alter or remove them, Prov. 23. 11. Deut. 19. 14. Deut. 27. 17. And when the Prophet Hosea would shew, how extreamly wicked the Princes of Judah were, he saith (Chap. 5. 10.) The Princes of Judah were like them that remove the bounds; as if he had said, we account those the worst of men, who remove land-marks; how vile then are these Princes, who are as bad as they. Just as the wickednesse of the people is aggravated, Chap. 4. 4. This people are as they that strive with the Priefl. To strive with the Priest, is to strive with God, that's a sad strife. Strivers with the Prist are the worst of people, how vile then are this people, who are as bad as they. But to the present poynt, if it be so great a sin to remove the land-stones, it must needs be a great mercy to have those stones preserved. So then, to be in league with the stones of the field, may have this good sence also, the boundary-stones shall be preserved, none shall remove them, and they shall preserve thy estate, that none shall invade or wast it.

Hence Observe,

God can doe us good by any thing, if he pleaseth, and nothing can doe us good without God.

Though we have carefully set up bounds, though we have made strong fences, yet these will not keep out evill or annoyance, unless there be a league, a league of Gods making for us; And God can produce our comforts out of improbables, yea impossibles to na­ture: He can fetch us bread and a blessing from stones. It was a temptation upon Christ, when he was hungry to make bread of stones. If thou be the son of God, command that these stones be made bread. Mat. 4. 2. But it is our comfort, that God can turn stones into bread, that he can make those things which are most improbable to do us good, very good unto us. It is a sin for us to turne stones into bread, or to expect stones to be turned into bread, that is, to put God upon miracles from us, when means or indeavours may help us; but God out of the superaboundance of his power and good­nesse, alwayes can, and sometimes will work miracles, turning stones into bread for us. Then, we turne stones into bread, when we live upon sin, whosoever eateth a bit of bread, out [Page 377] of bread out of the hand of sin, turneth stones into bread. Then, God turnes stones into bread for us, when out of his infinite pow­er and goodnesse, he gives us supplies by unusall meanes, and com­forts us by that, from which, we can expect no more comfort, then we doe bread and water out of stones.

Further, when stones seeme to be most angry with a godly man, then he is in league with them. Stones (in a proper sense) flew about the eares of Steven, and kil'd him, yet Steven was in league with the stones, even while they took away his life: God turned these stones into bread for him: and every stone, was as a glorious Diamond in his Crown of Martyrdome.

There are two Interpretations of this league with stones (which some make great store and treasure of) different from all these; Pineda. Crimen hoc ap­pellabant [...] cujus rei admissum, tale est: ple­ri (que) inimi [...]orum so [...]ent praedium inimici [...], id est lapides ponere indicio futuros, q [...]od si quis eum agrum coluisset, malo letho peri­turus esset insi­diis eorum, qui scopulos posuis­sent. Quoe res tantum timorem habet, ut nemo agrum accedere audeat crudeli­tatem timens eorum qui sco­pelismon fece­runt. Idem ex Vlpiano. The former is grounded upon a custome in Arabia, where, or neare which it is supposed Jobs friends dwelt It was (saith the learned Authour) a very capitall offence in that country, if any man did cast or carry heapes of stones into his neighbours ground; For that action had this signification or meaning in it, The man, who afterwards ventured to plow or till that ground, should sure­ly dye by the hands of those, who cast in those stones. So that, the sight of such stones was terrible and ominous to the owner of the Land, as speaking death and ruine to him, if he medled with it. Hence t'was often left unus'd and untill'd. Against this barbarous custome (it being an occasion of murders and blood shed) a very severe Law was made; That whosoever should be discovered to have cast such Stones into his neighbours ground, should have judgment of death by the Magistrate. In allusion to this Law or custome, the interpretation of this promise (Thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field) is made out thus. The ordinary Stones of the field shall be so farre from hurting, that, even those Stones, which speake anger and malice shall not hurt thee. God will re­concile or subdue the rage of thine enemies, and though they have cast these Stones of defiance into thy Land, yet they shall desire a league of peace with thee, or fall before thee.

The second is grounded upon a custome, in warre; of which we reade (2 Kin. 3. 25.) that, when the Moabites fled before Israel, The pursuing Israelites beat down their Cityes, and on every good peece of Land, cast every man his Stone, and filled it. &c. Eliphaz might have an eye to this, as if he had said, Thy land shall not be buried under the heapes of stones, thrown there by a conquering [Page 378] hand; that is, thou shalt have a league of amity with, or victory over all that are round about thee.

And the Beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee.

That is, they shall (through the power of God) be made peace­able to thee. To be at peace with the Beasts, is the same in propor­tion, with being in league with Stones. It was mans priviledge by creation to have power over the Beasts of the field, and it is the priviledge of Redemption, To be at peace with them. This is the ordinary priviledge of every Believer. But there is a more trans­cendent priviledge of the Church, in the most flourishing estate of it here on the earth, represented under this notion, Isa. 11. 6, 7, 8, 9. The Wolfe shall dwell with the Lambe, and the Leopard shall lie down with the Kid, and the Calfe, and the young Lion, and the fatling to­gether, and a little childe shall leade them, &c. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the Aspe, and the weaned childe shall put his hand on the Cockatrice den; They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountaine. This Peace with Beasts, is within a degree of glory with God, whether we understand it in the letter, of beasts in kind, or in the Allegory, of men symbolizing in rage and fierce­nesse, in power and poysons, in stings and teeth with beasts and Serpents.

The Text before us, goes lower then this promise; And to be at peace with the Beasts of the field, is, only a gracious assurance that they shall not hurt us, or that they shall be usefull to us. In the firmnesse of this promise of peace with the Beasts, the fearlesnesse of a godly man is founded, He shall not be afraid of the Beasts of the earth, for the Beasts of the earth shall be at peace with him. Hence observe,

The courage and fearlesnesse of a godly man, is grounded in divine reason, not on humane presumption.

When we see a man stout in the midst of danger, fearles amongst wild beasts, we may wonder where the spring of this courage lies: This promise sheweth you the spring-head, He is at peace with them; It is not conceit and fancy, or desperatenesse of spirit, that causeth him to deride and slight danger; but he hath a solid ground there is a peace and league ratified in heaven, for him even with the Stones and Beasts of the earth. As a godly man can give a rea­son of the hope that is in him; so he can give a reason of the cou­rage that is in him; he knowes why he is so stout and venturous.

Secondly, Observe from both, in that man is here said to be in league with the stones, and at peace with the Beasts; That

Every creature by sin is made dangerous and hurtfull unto man.

For, in that there is a league and peace made with these, it notes, that they were in a state of hostility, ready to rise up against us and annoy us. As the creature by reason of mans sin is subject unto va­nity; so man is subject unto feare, by reason of the creature. Sin hath made the creature vanitie in it selfe, and sinne hath made the creature vexation unto us. When the Beasts rebell against us, we should remember how we have rebelled against God, And, that un­till God renewes a league, and makes peace for us with the crea­tures, there is not a creature upon the earth, but may quickly be de­structive to us. If God speakes the word, and gives a call or a com­mission to a fly, against the strongest, the swiftest man; flight shall perish from the swift, and power from the strong, neither of them shall escape.

Thirdly, Thou shalt be in league with the Stones, and with the Beasts; he reckons up all those wayes, by which evills may come in upon us. And assures a man, to whom God is reconciled, that these evills shall not come. Hence observe; That

When God is once a friend to us, he can quickly make all other things friendly to us also.

Every godly man (of such Eliphaz here speaks) is at peace and Qui Dominum habet adjutorē, habebit & om­nes creaturas adjutrices, ille si favet, favent omnes: ait, aiunt: negat, negant: Qui Dominum ba­bet custodē ha­bebit & lapides campi custodes. Brent. in loc. Tranquillus Deus, Tranquil­lat omnia. in league with God, therefore God makes all creatures at peace and league with him. Though usually, they who are in nearest league and covenant with God, are most warred with, and opposed by the world, yet this stands sure, that when God is our friend, he can make our enemies our friends, or their enmity shall be-friend us; Stones and savage beasts shall be helpfull to us. When God is at peace with us, he makes all things at peace with us. Daniel was at peace with God, and he was at peace among the Lions. The Apo­stle (Rom. 8.) gives it in generall, If God be with us, who can be against us? No creature hath power in it selfe to maintaine warre and emnity against those, on whose side God appeares. If God loves us, All things worke together for good to us. He that hath helpe from God, shall not want helpe from any creature; for all creatures are at the call and command of God; If he saith, go, they must goe; if he saith, come, they must come; if he saith to a stone doe such a man good, the Stone must doe it; if he saith to a Raven, goe carry Elijah his dinner, the Raven will hasten; if he saith to [Page 380] a wild Beast, save such a man, deliver such a man, spare such a man, he must goe of Gods errand. In our friendship and league with God, we have a vertuall league of friendship with the most un­friendly creatures.

And if God please, he can make men, who have as little sense as Stones, and lesse reason than Beasts; to be helpfull and usefull, and peaceable to his people. There is a generation amongst us, a stony generation, a hard-hearted generation of men, you may as well move a stone, as move them with what you say; a beastly gene­ration of men, when you deale with them, you deale with Beasts; yet the great God, (if he please) can make a league for us with these stones, he can make these Beasts of the earth, brutish and un­reasonable men, To be at peace with us, Further observe,

It is from speciall providence, that the Stones, and the Beasts of the earth doe not hurt nor destroy us, but specially that they helpe and doe us good.

There is providence towards all, but a speciall providence to the people of God, that the creatures hurt them not. If God did not bridle the rage and restraine the power of Beasts, man could not comfortably subsist with them. The reason is given (Deut. 7. 22.) why God destroyed the Canaanites by little and little, before his people, namely, Least the Beasts of the earth should increase upon them. Here was a speciall providence, as all leagues, and peace­makings are. All the leagues and peace which beleevers have, are branches of that great league, of that grand Covenant, which God hath made with Christ on our behalfe. And therefore (Hos. 2. 18.) this promise is made in speciall to the Church. And in that day I will make a Covenant for them, with the Beasts of the field. Fifthly, note,

A godly man enjoyes common comforts from speciall favour.

Wicked men are seldome hurt by the beasts of the field but they are never at peace with them.

Lastly, observe,

Peace is a great mercy. By how much God makes more peace up­on earth, by so much, man hath more of Heaven upon Earth. Man should desire peace with Beasts, much more with men, most of all with God▪

JOB Chap. 5. Vers. 24, 25, 26, 27.

And thou shalt know that thy Tabernacle shall be in peace, and thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin.

Thou shalt know also that thy seed shall be great, and thine off spring as the grasse of the earth.

Thou shalt come to thy grave in a full age, like as a shock of corne commeth in, in his season.

Loe this, we have searched it, so it is, heare it, and know thou it for thy good.

AT the 19th verse of this Chapter, we had a promise of deli­verance from evill, in six troubles, and in seaven, In the ver­ses following, we had a specification of six or seaven troubles, from which deliverance is promised. In these words, we have the result of all, A well grounded security, in assurance of a fourfold blessing. First, of a quiet and happy life. Secondly, of many prosperous chil­dren, v. 25. Thirdly, of a long life. Fourthly of a sweet and comfor­table death, v. 26. every one confirmed and ratified as a truth in it selfe; a [...] by way of application brought home to Job, in the 27th or last verse of the Chapter.

Vers. 24. And thou shalt know that thy Tabernacle shall be in peace.

Thou shalt know it.] Knowledge is sometime put for present sense; He that keepes the commandement, shall feel (Heb. shall know) no evill: and so, Job is promised to know, his Tabernacle shall be in peace, that is, he shall see and feele it to be in peace. And

Secondly, Knowledge is put for experience; As we say of a rich man, he never knew poverty; And in that sense, Christ is said not to have knowne sin, 2 Cor. 5. 21. Thus, also, the godly man knows his Tabernacle shall have peace, even by the peace which he hath had; From the former dealings of God, he gathers con­clusions, what God will do with him, for the time to come; Thou shalt not find me a false Prophet, or that I have fed thee with wind: Thou shalt know from experience, that thy Tabernacle shall be in peace.

And there is a third way by which this might be knowne, sc. by debate and reasoning: Thou shalt know it; If thou doest [Page 382] but consider, what the estate of a godly man is, and what God hath spoken about that estate, thou mayest make out such a conclusion, that certainly thy Tabernacle shall be in peace.

There is a fourth way of knowing, and that is, upon the testi­mony or word of another, this is properly called Faith: Thou shalt know it, that is, by looking into the word of God, or consi­dering the promises made to godly men, thou shalt assent to and beleeve this thing, that thy Tabernacle shall be in peace.

Fiftly, To know, is as much as to be assured, or certaine of a thing; And to know so, is opposed not only to ignorance and opi­nion, but it is opposed to the lower degrees of faith; I know that my Redeemer lives, &c, (saith Job Chap. 19. 25.) that is, I am sure he lives. And the Apostle 2 Cor. 4. 14. Knowing that he which raised up the Lord Jesus, shall raise us up also by Jesus. Knowledge is often put for assurance, and it may rise to that pitch here, Thou shalt be assured that thy Tabernacle shall be in peace.

Thy Tabernacle.] Tabernacles were of two sorts. There were Tabernacles for civill uses, and the Tabernacle for church uses. They dwelt in Tabernacles, and God was worshipped in a Taber­nacle, And therefore (Ezek. 23. 4.) Israel and Judah, are called Aholah and Aholibah. Israel, the ten Tribes, is called Aholah, that is, a Tent, or a Tabernacle, noting, that they had been the Tent and the Tabernacle of God, wherein he was worshipped; But Judah is called Aholibah, that is, my Tent is in the middest of her, because God at that time continued the outward Ordinances of his worship to Judah, though the ten Tribes had been long in captivity. That only by the way. Here by Tabernacles we are to understand civill Tabernacles, for in those Easterne Countries their ordinary habitations and dwellings were in moveable Tents or Tabernacles, because of their frequent removes. And hence after­ward amongst the Latines, the word for a Tent or Tabernacle, sig­nified a house, or any place wherein men dwell and frequent. Fur­ther, by a Trope, a Tabernacle signifies all a mans estate, or all his goods; so that, when it is said, thy Tabernacle shall be in peace, the meaning is, thy whole estate and family, what ever thou hast, shall be in peace.

Shall be in peace.] That is, it shall be peaceable or in safety; Solent frequen­tissimè abstra­cta ob Emphas­in pro concre­tis praedicari. Peace may be considered two wayes; either strictly or largely: Strictly, and so peace is opposed to warre; either first, forreigne, or secondly, civill, or thirdly, domesticall warre (as we may call [Page 383] it) namely strife and contention in families. Thus, Thy Taber­nacle shall be in peace, may take in all these; thou shalt neither be invaded by forreigners, neither shalt thou have any insurrection and sedition in thy own borders; neither shalt thou have unkind contentions, in thy particular family, or within thy private walls.

Secondly, Take the word more largely (as it is very frequently in Scripture) and then peace signifies all manner of blessings and good things, the confluence and gathering together as it were, of all comforts: And peace in this large sense, is opposed to any kind of trouble or adversity; and to say such an one hath peace, is as much as to say, he prospers. Peace and prosperity are termes of the same signification: And then the meaning is this, Thou shalt know that thy Tabernacle shall be in Peace, that is, that thy whole estate shall prosper, and that thou shalt have good successe. Note hence First,

Peace is a choice and a speciall blessing.

Outward peace is the choicest of outward blessings, and inward peace is the choicest of spirituall blessings. Peace gives sweetnesse and beauty to all our blessings: without peace, riches are but guil­ded thornes; honour is but higher misery; health but stronger affliction.

So without inward peace, grace gives no present comfort; And therefore in the wishes of perfect spiritual mercy, to the Saints, we find these two in conjunction, Grace and Peace. The highest promi­ses made to the church, are promises of setled peace in the Church, Isa. 32. 18. My people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation, and in sure dwellings, and in quiet resting places: There's the top of their outward felicity. Againe, in the the thirty third of that prophecie, ver. 20. Looke upon Zion the City of our solemnities (that is, where the worship of God was solemniz'd) thine eyes shall see Jerusalem a quiet habitation; a Tabernacle that shall not be taken downe, not one of the stakes thereof shall ever be removed, neither shall any of the cords thereof be broken; Pure Ordinances, and a peaceable habita­tion, are Jerusalems perfection on earth; yea some looke upon it as a perfection too perfect for earth, and therefore interpret the prophecie of the heavenly Jerusalem,

Secondly, He saith not only, thou shalt have peace in thy Taber­nacle, but thou shalt know it. Hence observe,

To be assured of a mercy, is better than the enjoyment of a mercy.

Doubts of loosing a mercy, eat out the heart of a mercy; and a man in that case, is as much troubled with the feare of wanting, as he can be comforted with the sense of enjoying.

There are three steps of blessednesse. To be delivered from evill, is but a part of blessednesse, negative blessednes: To receive good, is the better part of blessednesse, positive blessednesse. But to be assured that we shall hold and retaine all this, is the perfection of blessednesse. The first part of that great blessing we receive by Christ, consists in our deliverance from evill, or in a freedome from perishing. The second consists in the conveyance of good to us, as pardon of sin, grace and glory. But the third (which is the height of all) consists in our everlasting assurance to enjoy all this: Adam had a good estate, but he was not assured of it: The bles­sings we have by Christ, are built upon a foundation, which can never be shaken. In this method, temporall mercies are promised in this Scripture: First, deliverance from sword and famine. Se­condly, peace with the creatures. Thirdly, an assurance that this peace shall be continued. Lastly observe,

All outward blessings are in themselves fading and perishing.

Though a man be assured that he shall enjoy outward blessings, yet he can enjoy them but in the nature and condition of outward blessings. Though he be sure to use and enjoy them, yet he looks upon them as perishing in the using. All outward things are here (as frequently in other Scriptures) implied under the notion of a Tabernacle; a Tabernacle is a moveable habitation. It is a peece of a miracle if a Tabernacle stand long; that promise (Isa. 33. 20.) imports somewhat extraordinary: A Tabernacle that should not be taken downe, not one of the stakes thereof removed, nor any of the cords thereof be broken; It is as if the holy Ghost should say; Thou shalt be a Tabernacle priviledg'd above all Tabernacles: They are moveable, unfixed, easie to be taken downe; but it shall not be so with thee. The Apostles conclusion takes in all creature comforts, The fashion of this world passeth away, 1 Cor. 7 31. The scheme, the beauty of the best earthly things passe, while we enjoy them, and moulder away between our hands while we are using them.

And thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin.

This clause of the verse compleats mercy yet higher; It is better not to sin in our habitation, then to be assured of a habitation. To [Page 285] have quietnesse in our habitation is very good, but to have holinesse in it, is best of all. Thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin.

The word which we translate habitation, signifies not only a house, but a wife, or a housewife; Hence some render, Thou shalt [...] Habitatio & in soeminino genere signifi­cat▪ Habi [...]atri­cem mulierem, sc. habitantem in domo, & exornantem eam Moller. in Psal. 68 13. visit thy beauty, or thy faire and beautifull wife, and shalt not sin; The reason is, either because a good wife is the beauty and orna­ment of the house: or because the knowledge, wisedome and dili­gence of the wife, is a meanes to furnish and adorne the house; or lastly, the businesse of a wife is so much in the house, that she shares names with the house: she is, or ought to be like a shaile, living with her house upon her back. The Apostles rule also be­ing, I will that the younger women marry, beare children, guide the house, 1 Tim. 5, 14. And exhort them to be discreet, chast, kee­pers at home, Tit. 2. 5. Hence also probably, the same word in Hebrew, signifies a beautifull wife, and a beautifull house. We reade it in that sense (Psal. 68. 12.) Kings of armies did fly apace, and she that tarried at home divided the spoile. She that tarried at home, or the beauty of the house (sc. the wife) divided the [...] spoile. The meaning is, such victory shall be obtained over the enemies of the Church, that the wives and weake women, shall be fill'd with those spoiles, which theit triumphant husbands shall bring home to them.

But here, we may rather take the word in the ordinary sense, only with this emphasis, signifying (not bare walls, or a nume­rous family) but a beautifull, a well furnished, a well ordered house. And so we have the word, at the third verse of this Chap­ter, where Eliphaz saith, I saw the wicked taking root, and pre­sently I cursed his habitation, or his goodly, beautifull, flourishing house: So here, thou shalt visit thy habitation, that is, thy house in all the beauty, order, riches and furniture of it.

Thou shalt visit. The word signifies more, then to see and look upon buildings and furniture: To visit, notes in Scripture these [...] Visitavit three or foure things.

1. To overlooke or take care of the house; To visit the house, is to provide for the house. Psal. 8. 4. Lord what is man that thou visitest him! that is, that thou takest so much eare of him, and hast such waking thoughts about him.

2. To visit the house, notes an enquirie of what is done in the house, how things goe in the family.

3. It imports a calling of all to an account and reckoning, about [Page 386] what is done in their discharge of family duties.

4. To visit, is to order and direct, to command and give precepts for what shall be done. Hence frequently in the old Testament, the Commandements of God are expressed by this word, his pre­cepts. So then, thou shalt visit thy house, or thy habitation, may take in all these; thou shalt as a Master, view, and over-see, direct and call to account thy house and family. In this sense, the word is commonly used amongst us; That act of the Bishops calling their Diocesses to an account, and over-looking them, was called their Visitation. And over Colledges, Hospitals and such publicke foun­dations, Visitors are appointed, to see and take an account, how the rules and statutes of those places are observed. Thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin.

But how is it said he shall doe this, and not sin? Doth not sin min­gle with all we doe?

The word here used, signifies, 1. Tropically, to erre, faile or miscarry in the generall. 2. Properly, to misse a speciall marke or way, to shoot awry, or wander instead of walking; as (Judg. [...] 20. 16.) it is said of those seven thousand Benjamites, that they Erravit ā via, vel scopo. could shoot at an haires bredth, and not sin, so the word is, or not miscarry, not misse the marke. And because every transgressi­on, is a wandring out of the way of Gods commandements, or a shooting beside the marke of his word; therefore that word in Non afficieris poena pro pecca­to [...] P [...]gn. Non laede [...]is, non accpies damnum aut detrimentum, Targ. Curabis res tu­as & domum tuam, at eas procurans, non f [...]ustrabe [...]is spetua, cedentibus tibi rebus om­nibus pro voto & ex animi sententia, Mer. Non aberrabis sc. ā scopo & fine desiderij [...]ui. Coc Scripture, is commonly used for sinning.

Here the word admits of a two-fold interpretation.

First, For the fruit or effect of sin, thus, thou shalt order and over looke thy family, with such wisdome and discretion, that thou shalt not erre or doe things beside the rule of prudence, and so bring miscarriages and troubles upon thy affaires by sinne. Mr Broughton translates to this sense, Thou shalt visit thy habita­tion, and shalt not misprosper. And so Eliphaz may hint at Jobs former losses, at the overthrow of his estate and family; as if he had said, heretofore thou didst visit thy habitation, and didst not prosper, but if thou shalt now humble thy selfe, thou shalt visit thy habitation, and all shall prosper, things shall goe well with thee, thou shalt not labour in vaine, or loose thy end in the care thou takest about thy family.

Secondly, the sense may be this, thou shalt order and visit thy family, with so much justice, equity & holinesse, that thou shalt not sin. Not that Eliphaz undertakes his absolute freedome from [Page 387] sin, but he should not sin as (he supposed he had) before, thou shalt not run into such errors, or split thy selfe upon such rocks as have wrackt thy former greatnesse And thus he secretly reproves Jobs former carriage in his family, as irregular and sinfull.

There is a further exposition joyning both these together, Thou shalt visit thy house, and shalt not sin, namely, by conniving or winking at the sins and disorders of thy family, and yet thou shalt have peace: thy strict and faithfull carriage in over-seeing thy fa­mily, shall not provoke either servants, or children to contention and complainings, to anger and passion; Thy holy severity shall not fill thy house with quarrels and troubles; but God shall so Domestici cor­repti non suc­censebunt [...] V [...] ­tabl. over awe the spirits of those under thee, that they shall willingly and cheerefully submit to thy purer discipline. Observe hence, First,

It is a great and a speciall point of godly wisdome, well to order and visit a family.

Families are the principles or seeds of a Common-wealth. As every man is a little world, so every house is a little King­dome. A family is a Common-wealth in a little volume. And the rules of it, are an epitomie of all Lawes, by which whole Nations are govern'd. The Apostle makes it a speciall character of his Bishop, That he must be one who rules his own house well; and subjoynes the reason, For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the Church of God? 1 Tim. 3. 4, 5. And therein wraps up this truth, that he who knowes how to rule his own house well, is in a good posture of spirit for publike rule. The same wisdome, and justice, and holinesse for kind, only more enlarg'd and extensiue, acts in either spheare, and will regu­larly move both. Secondly,

A family well visited and ordered, is usually a prosperous fa­mily.

Sinne spoiles the comforts and cankers the blessings of a family.

Sin brought into a house, rots the timber, and pulls down the house; or it undermines the foundation, and blowes up the house. The sin of families, is the ruine and consumption of families. Hence thirdly observe,

To be kept from sin, is a better and a greater blessing, than all outward blessings.

When Eliphaz had reckoned up all the comforts, which repen­ting Job is promised; Thou shalt be delivered in six troubles and [Page 388] in seven: Sword and famine shall not hurt thee, peace and plenty shall dwell within thy walls, and lodge in every chamber: Yet (saith he) I will tell thee of a blessing, beyond all these, thou shalt not sin: It is more mercy to be delivered from one sin, then from sword and famine; grace is better then peace, and holinesse then aboundance; riches, and honour, and health, are all obscured in this one blessing, A holy, a gracious, an humble heart.

There is more evill in one sin, than in any or all troubles; there­fore, there must needs be a greater blessing in being kept from sin, than in protection from any or all troubles. Sin is the greatest evill, therefore to be kept from sin, is one of the greatest goods. Christ took upon him all sorts of outward evils, he became poor for our sakes, he had not so much as an house to lye in: he came in the forme of a servant for our sakes, and he was a man of sorrowes, He was acquainted with grief all his life, at last with death and a grave; Yet, he would not admit of the least sin: he was content to bears all our sins, but he abhord the thought of acting one. Not to sin, is the next priviledge to God, and the utmost priviledge of man. When in a full sense, man shall not sin, man will be arrived at fulnes of joy; and as we daily empty of sin, so we proportionably, fill with joy.

Vers. 25. Thou shalt know also that thy seed shall be great, and thy off spring as the grasse of the earth.

From the present bessings upon the family, he descends to those which concerne posterity; as if he had said, thy comforts shall not be confined to thy selfe, neither shall they be shut up within the limits of one generation; Mercies shall be transmitted to thy children, thy heires shall inherit blessings.

Thy seed shall be great. The word Great, signifies both multi­tude and magnitude: Thou shalt have a great seed, that is, a nu­merous [...] seed a multitude of children; and thou shalt have a great seed, that is, honourable and wealthy children; Job himselfe was called, Chap. 1. 3. (though by another word, yet in the same sense) the greatest man in the East; This greatnesse is promised his children, and thy shall receive additionall further blessings: For the word [Rab] signifies greatnesse, in a continuall motion to more eminent greatnesse: And therefore it is sometime translated by encreasing; So (Isa. 9. 6.) where the Prophet sets out the flou­rishing glory of the kingdome of Christ; Of the increase of his Kingdome and peace, there shall be no end; or, of the greatnesse [Page 389] and greatning of his kingdome, there shall be no end. So that, to say thy seed shall be great, notes, not only some standing greatnesse, but growing greatnesse: they shall ever be upon an encrease, till they come to their full in glory.

And thy off-spring as the grasse of the earth.

Both clauses of the verse meane the same thing. The word which we translate off-spring, signifies properly that which goeth forth or issues, because children spring or goe forth from their pa­rents, [...] Germina sicut ex vite palmi­tes. and are therefore called their issue. And the word is used for the bud of the Olive or of the Vine; hence the Psalmist puts them both into a similitude. Thy children shall be like olive plants round about thy table, They are as the olive bud in their birth, and as the olive branch in their growth.

Thy off-spring shall be as the grasse of the earth.

To be as the grasse of the earth, is a proverbiall speech; and it Proverbiale multitudinis, talia sunt sicut arena maris, ut stellae coeli, Drus. arises to the sense of those proverbials spoken to Abraham con­cerning his seed, thy seed shall be as the Starres of Heaven: And thy seed shall be as the sand upon the sea-shore. The grasse of the field is as innumerable, as the Starres, or the sands; Thy off spring shall be as the grasse of the sield. Thou shalt not only have a numerous, but thou shalt have (as it were) an innumerable off spring.

Man kind in generall is compared unto grasse, Isa. 40. 6. All flesh is grasse; Grasse in regard of its sudden withering, he is suddenly cut downe, the goodlinesse of man is as the flower of the field. Wicked men are compared to grasse, not only because they wither, but because they wither suddenly, or are cut downe by some hand of justice. The off-spring of a godly man, are com­pared to grasse, but in another reference. To grasse, first, because of their multitude, and secondly, because of their beauty, they shall flourish and be green as the grasse, which is very pleasant to the beholders eye.

And in this also Eliphaz aimes at the death of Job's children; Thou hast lost thy children, they perished miserably, but if thou Hoc dicit quia. Iob filios ami­serat. Merc. returne, that blessing shall returne, thy seed shall be great, and thy off spring shall be as the grasse of the earth.

The blessing of children hath been shewed in the first Chap­ter, therefore I shall but name a point or two now. First, That

The posterity of godly parents. stand neerer then others, [Page 390] under the influence of heavenly blessings.

As grace doth not runne in a blood, so neither do blessings in­fallibly runne in a blood, yet the children of those who are blessed, are neerest a blessing: And their possibilities for mercy are fairest. Many promises are made to them, they are heires apparent of the promises in their parents right; others to appearance, are strangers from the promises. Though, we know free grace chuseth often out of the naturall line; The mercies of God are his own, and it is his prerogative, to have mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardneth.

Secondly, When he summes up the blessings of a godly man, the blessings of his children are cast into the account. Whence note,

That the blessings of the children, are the blessings of the parent.

As the parent is afflicted in the afflictions of his children, so he is blessed in their blessings. Relations share mutually both in com­forts and crosses. Children are their parents multiplied, and every good of the child, is an addition to the parents good. A flourishing and a numerous posterity is a great outward blessing. Some have the choisest of spirituall blessings, who want this (Isa. 56. 3.) God comforts those that have no children, Doe not say that thou art made a dry tree; for I will give thee in mine house, a place and a name better than of sons and daughters; As if he had said, the name of sons and of daughters, is a very great comfort, but it is not the greatest comfort, the best biessing: thou shalt have a name and a place, better than of sons and daughters.

Vers. 26. Thou shalt come to thy grave in a full age, like as a shock of corne commeth, in his season.

From personall present blessings of this life, and the blessings of posterity, Eliphaz descends to shew the blessing of a godly man in death. A happy death is the close of temporall happinesse, and the beginning of eternall. A happy death stands between grace and glory, like the Baptist between the law and the Gospel, and is the connexion or knitting of both. And as it was said of John, That among them who are borne of women, there arose not a greater then he, neverthelesse, he that is least in the kingdome of heaven, is greater then John: So we may say, that among all the blessings of this life, there is none greater then a blessed death, neverthelesse that which is least in eternall life, is a greater blessing, then a blessed [Page 391] death. It was an observation among the Heathen, That no man is to be accounted blessed, untill he die. But when life is shut up with a blessing, then man is fully blessed; As in reasoning, so in living, the conclusion lyes in the premises. A happy death is the re­sult of a holy life.

Thou shalt come to thy grave.] That phrase notes two things.

First, A willingnesse and a chearfulnesse to die. Thou shelt come, thou shalt not be dragged or hurried to thy grave, as it is said of the foolish rich man, Luk. 12. This night shall thy soule be taken from thee. But thou shalt come to thy grave, thou shalt die quietly and smilingly, as it were, thou shalt goe to thy grave, as it were upon thine owne feet, and rather walke, then be carried to thy Sepul­cher.

Secondly, it notes the honor and solemnity of burying. Thou shalt come to thy grave with honour; as it is said of Ahijah the son of Je­roboam, 1 King. 14. 12, 13. When Messengers were sent to the Pro­phet to enquire whether he should recover, the Prophet tels them, The child shall die, and all Israel shall mourne for him, and bury him: For, he only of Jeroboam shall Come to the grave, because in him there is found some good thing toward the Lord God of Isra­el, in the house of Jeroboam. He only shall come to thy grave, the rest shall be thrust into the grave, or lye unburied, but he shall come, that is, he shall be buried with honour; others shall have reproach cast upon them, when the earth is cast upon them. Thou shalt come to thy grave.

In a full age] So we translate. The word is expounded two [...] Senium senectutis tem­pus. wayes.

In a full age, that is, in an age, when thou shalt be full: full of estate, full of wealth and honour, thou shalt have abundance when thou diest. And so it points at Jobs present poverty: though thou hast nothing now, scarse a ragge to thy backe, or a sheet to winde thee in, if thou shouldst die, yet seeke unto God, and thou shalt die in a full age, in a golden Age, thy wants shall be supplied, and thy losses repaired to the full.

But rather a full Age, notes here a sulnesse of daies, though the other (fullnesse of estate) be not excluded. The Prophet puts the same difference, between aged men, and men full of dayes, as is between children, and young men (Jer. 6. 11.) I am full of the fury of the Lord, I will powre it out upon the children abroad, and up­on [Page 392] the assembly of young men together, The aged, with him that is full of dayes. That is, all ages shall feele the fury of the Lord. A full age, is an age full of daies or compleate to the utmost time of [...] life. Some of the Jewish Writers observe that the numerall letters of this word (Chelad) make up threescore, which they conceive is In numeris no­tat 60 ea prima senectus est, non matura. Quidam Hebrae orum vi [...]idem senectam nomine [...] putant significari, ut Caph sit simili­tudinis [...] [...]u [...]è virtutem & humidum sonat. [...]. Senctutem i­ta (que) pollecetur-non quidem m [...] ­lestam & mor­bosam sed vege­tā & paelicem. the age here meant; but threescore is not a full old-oge, it is rather the beginning of old-age. Therefore fulnesse of age, is by others interpreted, to be strength of age; thou shalt die in an old age, yet thou shalt have strength and comfort in thy old-age; thine old-age shall not be a troublesome age, thou shalt not be weake and crazy, distempered and sick, a burthen to thy selfe, or friends; thou shalt die (as some translate) in a good old-age, or as Mr. Broughton, thou shalt die in lusty old-age; Time shall not wither thee, nor drinke up thy blood and spirits, Thou shalt have a spring in the Autumne, and a Summer in the winter of thy life. As it was with Moses, Deut. 34. 7. who died, when he was an hundred and twenty yeares old, yet saith the text, His eye was not dimme, nor his naturall force abated; This is to die in a full old-age, full of daies, yet full of strength and health. It is a great blessing, when a man is (in this sense) youthfull in old-age: when others see with foure eyes, and goe with three leggs, he uses neither staff nor specta­cles, but renews his strength like the Eagle.

Or, we may take the sense more generally, for any one that liveth long, and liveth comfortably; as it was said of Abraham, Gen. 25. 8. That he died in a good old-age, an old man, and full of yeares. He died in a good old-age; The young-man is counsel'd, To re­member his Creator in the dayes of his youth; before the evill daies come, Eccles. 12. 1. What are those? Those evill daies are the daies of old-age: The words following being an Allegoricall, ele­gant description of old age. Old-age in it selfe is the evill day: The lives of many old-men are a continuall death. They live as it were upon the racke of extreame paines or strong infirmities; there­fore it is a speciall blessing for man to be old, and yet to have a good old-age, that is, a florid comfortable old-age; To have ma­ny yeares and few infirmities is a rare thing. In some old-age flou­rishes, and in others old-age perishes, Job gives us this difference in the use of this word, Chap. 30. 2. Yea whereto might the strength of their hands profit me, in whom (Chelad) old-age was perished, As if he had said, some old-men are active and strong, but these, who were faded and flatted in all their abilities, in what [Page 393] stead could they stand me? They were a trouble to themselves, and therefore could be no comfort unto others.

This full old-age is explained further, by way of similitude, He shall die in a full age, lie as a shock of corne commeth in, in his season. When a young man dye, he is as greene corne. The Psal­mist imprecates that some may be like the grasse or corne on the house-top, that withereth before it is cut downe, whereof the mow­er Psal. 129. 6, 7. filleth not his hand, nor he that bindeth up the sheaves, his bo­some. The life of a man sometimes is like corn growing upon the house top, that withereth: Or (as it is in the parable of the sower, Mat. 13.) like the corne that fell on the high-way side, or among stones and thornes, which came not in, in it's season, it never staid the ripening or reaping, but was eaten up or dried or choaked be­fore the harvest. Now here, man is compared unto corne, sow­ed in good ground, well rooted and continuing out it's season, and is brought in ripe at harvest. Old-age is the harvest of nature.

Some divide mans life into seven parts, comparing it to the seven planets; Some into five, comparing it to the five acts of an inter­lude; but commonly the life of man is divided into foure parts, and so it is compared to the foure seasons of the yeare. And in that division, old-age is the winter-quarter, cold and cloudy, full of rheumes and catarrhs of diseases and distellations. But here, old-age is the harvest; though, thou art a very old-man, thou shalt not die as in winter, but thou shalt die, as it were in harvest, when thou art full ripe and readie, as a shock of corne that is laid up in the barne; The generall judgement of the world is compared to a har­vest, and death (which is a particular day of judgement) is a har­vest too.

Those words, He shall come to his grave as a shock of corne, are [...] Ascendere signi­ficat [...]vanescere, velut in auras tolli velè medio tolli. further considerable, the Hebrew is, He shall ascend as a shock of corre; and that referring to death, is sometimes translated by cut­ting off, or taking away, Psal. 102. 25. Cut me not off in the midst of my daies; The letter is, Let me not ascend in the midst of my daies: Whether it have any allusion to that hope or faith of the Saints in their death, that, they doe but ascend, when they die; or to their disappearing to the eye of sence, when they die, because things which ascend, vanish out of sight, and are not seene; In ei­ther sence, when the Saints are cut downe by death, they ascend [...] Propriè signifi­cat acervum frugum, qui in And they are elegantly said, To ascend as a shock of corne, because that is taken from the earth, and reored or stackt up; and so by a [Page 394] Metaphor it signisies a Tombe or a monument errected or high-built over a dead corpse, much after the manner of a shock of corn; area erigitur. Metaphoricè tumultum ceu currulum te [...]rae vel monumentū sepulcro impo­si [...]um. So the word is used, He shall remaine in the tombe or Heape. Job 22. 32.

So then, the sum of this verse, is a promise of comfort and ho­nour in death: He shall die in a full age, when he is readie and ripe for death. Yet this is not to be taken strictly, that, every godly man dies in such a full old age, in an age full of daies or full of com­forts. Many of Gods best servants have had evill daies in their old age; their old age hath had many daies of trouble and sickness, of paine and perplexity. But thus it is with many in old age, and this is especially to be look't upon as an Old Testament promise, when the Lord dealt more with his people, invisible externall mer­cies. Yet, in one sense it is an universall truth, and ever fulfilled to his people, for whensoever they die, they die in a good age, yea though they die in the spring and flower of youth, they die in a good old age; that is, they are ripe for death, when ever they die; when ever a godly man dies, it is harvest time with him; though in a naturall capacity he be cut down, while he is green, and cropt in the bud or blossome, yet in his spirituall capacity, he never dies before he is ripe. God ripens his speedily, when he intends to take them out of the world speedily. He can let out such warme rayes and beams of his Spirit upon them; as shall soone maturate the seeds of grace, into a preparednesse for glory: whereas a wicked man living an hundred yeaers, hath no full old-age, much lesse a good old-age, he is ripe indeed for destruction, but he is never ripe for death; he is as unreadie and unripe for death, when he is an hundred years old, as when he was but a day old. He hath not be­gun to live, when he dies; or he is at the end of his naturall race, be­fore he hath set one step in his spiritual. Gray haires are the shame, and should be the sorrow of old-age, when they are not found in the way of righteousnesse. From the former branch of this verse, observe; First,

To have a comely buriall, to come to the grave with honour, is a great blessing.

It was threatned upon Jehojakim, the sonne of Josiah, as a curse, That he should have the buriall of an Asse, and be drag'd and cast out beyond the gates of the City, Jer. 22. 19. That man surely had lived like a beast, whom God threatn'd by name, that when he died, he should be used as a beast: though we know the bodies of [Page 395] many of the servants of God, have been scattered, and may be scat­tered upon the face of the earth, like dung; The dead bodies (as the complaint is, Psal. 79. 2.) of thy servants have they given to be meat to the fowles of the heaven, the flesh of thy Saints to the beasts of the earth. Yet to them (even then) there is this blessing re­served, beyond the blessing of a buriall, they are ever laid up in the heart of God, he takes care of them, he embalmes them for immortality, when the remains of their mortality, are troden un­der foot, or rot upon a dunghill.

Secondly, observe, A godly man, is a volunteer in his death; He commeth to the grave: A wicked man, never dies willingly, Though he sometime die by his own hand, yet he never dies with his own will. Miserable man is sometimes so over-prest with ter­rours, and horrours of conscience, so worne out with the trouble of living, that he hastens his own death. Yet he, Comes not to his grave willingly, but is drag'd by necessity. He thrusts his life out of doores with a violent hand, but it never goes out with a cheerfull mind. He is often unwilling to live, but he is never wil­ling to die. Death is welcome to him, because life is a burden to him. Only they come to the grave, who, by faith have seene Christ lying in the grave, and perfuming that house of corruption, with his owne most precious body, which saw no corruption. Ob­serve thirdly.

To live long and to die in a full age is a great blessing. Old Eli had this curse pronounced upon his family, 1 Sam. 2. 31. There shall not be an old man in thy house.

Gray haires are a crown of honour, when they are found in the way of righteousnesse. It is indeed infinitely better, to be full of grace, than to be full of daies; but to be full of daies, and full of grace too, what a venerable spectacle is that? To be full of years, and full of faith, full of good workes, full of the fruits of righte­ousnesse, which are by Christ, How comely and beautifull beyond all the beauty and comelinesse of youth, is that? Such are truly said to have filled their daies. Those daies are fill'd indeed, which are full of goodnesse. When a wicked man dies, he ever dies emp­tie and hungrie; he dies empty of goodnesse, and he dies hungry after daies. That place before mentioned of Abraham (Gen. 25. 8.) is most worthy our second thoughts, He dies in a good old-age, an old man, and full, so the Hebrew, we reade, full of years; As a man, that hath eaten and drunke plentifully, is full; and desires no [Page 396] more. So, he dyed an old-man and full, that is, he had lived as much as he desired to live, he had his fill of living, when he died. And therefore also, it may be called a full age, because a godly man hath his fill of living, but a wicked man (let him live never so long) is never full of daies, never full of living; he is as hungry and as thirsty (as a man may speake) after more time and daies, when he is old, as he was when he was a child, faine he would live hill; He must needs thinke it is good being here, who knowes of no better being, or hath Impij quamvis diu vivant. ta­men non implent dies suos, quia spem in rehus temporarijs col­locantes perpe­tua vita in hoc mundo pe [...]frui vellent. no hopes of a better, It is a certaine truth, He that hath not a tast of eternity, can never be satisfied with time. He that hath not some hold of everlasting life, is never pleased to let goe this life; therefore he is never full of this life. It is a most sad thing, to see an old man, who hath no strength of body to live, yet have a strong mind to live. Abraham was old and full, he desired not a day, or an houre longer His soul had never an empty corner for time, when he died. He had enough of all, but (of which he could never have e­nough and yet had enough, and all, as soon as he had any of it) e­ternity. In that great restitution promised, Isa. 65. 20. this is one priviledge, There shall be no more there, an infant of daies, nor an old man that hath not fil'd his daies. There is much controversie about the meaning of those words; The digression would be too long to insist upon them. Only to the present point thus much, that there is such a thing, as an Infant of daies, and an old man that hath not fill'd his daies.

An infant of daies, may be taken for an old child, that is, an old man childish, or a man of many years, but few abilities. A man whose hoary head ann wrinkled face speak fourscoure, yet his foolish actions and simple carriage speake under fourteene. An old man that hath not fill'd his daies, is conceived to be the same man, in a different character. An old man fils not his dayes. First When he fulfils not the duty, nor reaches the end for which he li­ved to old-age; That man who hath lived long, and done little, hath left empty daies, upon the record of his life. And when you have writ downe the daies, the months, and yeares of his life, his storie's done, the rest of the book is but a continued Blanke, no­thing to be remembred that he hath done, or nothing worth the remembrance.

Now as an old man fils not his daies, when he satisfies not the expectation of others: so in the second place his daies are not fill'd, when his own expectations are not satisfied, that is, when he ha­ving [Page 397] lived to be old, hath yet young fresh desires to live, when he finds his mind empty, though his body be so full of daies, that it can hold no longer, nor no more. He that is in this sense, an infant of dayes, and an old man not having filled his dayes, though he be an hundred yeares old when he dies, yet he dies (as the Prophet con­cludes in that place) accursed; he comes not to his grave under the blessing of this promise in the text, in a full age. Lastly ob­serve.

Every thing is beautifull in its season.

He shall come to his grave like a shock of corne that is brought in in his season. Even pale death hath beauty in it, when it comes in season. Eccles. 7. 17. Be not wicked over much, why shouldst thou dye before thy time? No man can dye before Gods time, but a man may dye before his time, that is, before he is prepared by grace, and before he is ripened in the course of nature. Those two wayes a man dyes before his time; First, when he dyes without any strength of grace; Secondly, when he dyes in the strength of nature. In this sense the Prophet describes the hand of God upon him, Psal. 102. 23. He weakned my strength in the way; [...] shortned my dayes: and therefore prayes in the 24th verse, I said, O my God take me not away in the midst of my dayes: That is, in the strength or best of my times according to the line and measure of nature A godly man prayes that he may not dye out of season; but a wicked man never dies in season: That threatning is ever ful­filled upon him, in one sense, if not in both (Psal. 55. 23) The blood­thirsty and deceitfull man shall not live out halfe his dayes. A wic­ked man never lives out halfe his daies; for, either he is cut off be­fore he hath lived halfe the course of nature, or he is cut off before he hath lived a quarter of the course of his desires; either he lives not halfe so long as he might, or not a tenth, not a hundreth part so long as he would; and therefore let him dye when he will, his death is full of terror, trouble and confusion, because he dies out of season. He never kept time or season with God, and surely God will not keep or regard his time or season.

Vers. 27. Loe this, we have searched it; so it is, heare it, and know thou it for thy good.

As Eliphaz began his dispute with an elegant preface, so he ends it with a rhetoricall conclusion; as if he had said▪ Job, I have spoken many things unto thee, heare now the summe and upshot of [Page 398] all; Loe this, we have searched it, so it is, heare it, and know it for thy good.

Two things he concludes with, First with an assertion of the truth of what he had spoken, So it is. Secondly, with a motion for his assent to what was spoken, Heare it.

Or the words may fall under a three-fold consideration.

  • As the
    • 1. Conclusion
      • of his speech.
    • 2. Confirmation
    • 3. Application

And this application is strengthned by a three-fold Motive.

By a motive, first from experience, Loe this, we have searched it, we have found the thing to be true.

Secondly, By a motive from the truth of the thing in it selfe, so it is: we have searched it, we have experience of it, so it is, the thing is certaine. And then

Thirdly, From the fruit and benefit of it, if he submit unto and obey the truth delivered, know it for thy good, thou shalt reap the profit of it. These are three motives, by which he strengthens his exhortation, in applying the truth he had beaten out, in his for­mer discourse.

We have searched it.] As if Eliphaz had said, we have not ta­ken [...] Scrutatus, per­scrutatus est, remota aut ab­strusa. these things upon trust, or by an implicite faith; we have not received them by tradition from our fathers, but we have searched, and tryed, and found out, that thus the matter stands in Gods dis­pensations, both to a wicked man, and to a godly man, in all the particulars run thorough in this Chapter. Or we have searched, that is, we have learned these truths by experience; That, God pu­nisheth not the innocent, that, man cannot compare in justice with God, that, hypocrites shall not prosper long, and that, mans affli­ctions are the fruit of his transgressions. The word signifies a very diligent and exact scrutiny, (Deut. 13. 14.) Thou shalt en­quire and make search, and aske diligently; it is to search as Jud­ges Diligenti in­quisitione & verita is scru­tatiene nec non reconditorum divinae provi­dentiae judicio­rum considera­tione rem ita se habere compe­ [...]im [...]. search and enquire about any crime, or question in Law deter­minable by their sentence; and as we search to find the meaning of a riddle. (Judg. 14. 14.) The word is also applied to the sear­chings and enquiries of a Spie (Judg. 18. 2.) sent to bring intel­ligence; A spie is an exact inquisitor, into all affaires, given him in charge for discovery. So here, we have searched out, we have spi­ed out and tryed this thing to the utmost, we have as it were, read over all the records of divine Truths, we have examined all expe­riences [Page 399] and examples, and this is the result, the summe of all, Loe thus it is.

A question arises here, how Eliphaz can say, we have searcht it, when as Chap. 4. he saith, A thing was secretly brought to me? It seemes these were matters attained and beaten out by study, not sent in by divine revelation; and so are rather the opinions of men, then the oracles of God. Men inspired by the Holy Ghost, speak another language; As, Thus saith the Lord, or this we have recei­ved, not this we have searched. Scripture is given by inspiration from God. not by the disquisitions of men

Some have hence concluded this speech of Eliphaz Apocryphal, Ex quo intelli­gimus hanc E­liphae disser­tionem non or a­culi fuisse, sed studij, nec ad Dei revelantis responsa, sed ad humani ingenij inventa perti­nere. Janson. in loc. as being rather matter of humane invention, then divine inspira­tion: Or the work of mans wit, rather then of Gods Spirit.

But I answer. First, The Apostle Paul hath sufficiently attested the Divine Authority of this discoruse, by alledging a proof out of it, 1 Cor. 3. 19.

Secondly, That which was secretly brought to Eliphaz, was that one speciall Oracle, Chap. 4. 17. Shall mortall man be more just then God? shall a man be more pure then his maker? The other part of his discourse, to which these words (Loe this we have searched) refer, were grounded upon the experiences which himselfe and his friends had observed in, and about the providence of God in all his dealings both with the godly and the wicked, all agreeable to that grand principle received by immediate revela­tion. And therefore as he told Job before, that the generall posi­tion was brought him in a vision, so all ages and the records kept of them (in all which he had made a diligent enquirie) came up fully to the proofe of it; As if he had said, The Lord told me so, and all he hath done in the word proclaimes that it is so. His word is enough to assert his own justice, but his works witnesse with it. Loe, this, we have searched, so it is.

We have searched. He speaks in the plurall number; he begun his speech in the fourth Chapter, and he concluds it here in the plurall number. Yet we are not to think, that, this was a discourse penn'd by them all together; or debated first in private conference, and agreed on, that thus Eliphaz should speake, because he saith, we have searched it. But the meaning is only this, I suppose I have spoken the sense of my two friends, who stand by, and I beleeve they are ready to subscribe to, or vote every word I have now ut­tered, therefore behold we have searched and thus it is.

Heare thou it. To advise thee, was our part; to heare and hear­ken is thy part; therefore heare it.

But had he not heard them all this while, why doth Eliphaz now bid him heare it?

It is true, he had heard; but there is more required, then the hearing of the eare, when such a Sermon as this is preached. To heare, is more than the worke of the eare. It is

First, To beleeve and give credit to what was heard. (Joh. 9. 27.) I told you before, and you would not heare (saith the blind man) wherefore would you heare it againe? that is, I have told you already, but you would not beleeve, nor give credit to what I spake.

Secondly, To heare is to hearken, that is, to yeeld and consent to what is spoken. (Gen. 3. 17.) Forasmuch, as thou hast hearkned to the counsell of thy wife: Barely to heare a temptation to sin, is no act of sin; as barely to heare an exhortation to good, is no act of grace. Therefore because thou hast hearkned, is, because thou hast yeelded and consented to, that which she hath spoken.

Thirdly, To heare, is to obey. Isa. 55. 3. Heare and your soule shall live. It is not every hearing af the eare, that bringeth life to the soule, obedient hearing is enlivening hearing.

So here, we have searched it, so it is, heare it, that is, beleeve what we have spoken, submit unto, and consent to what we have spoken, obey and practise what we havespoken.

To heare, is both an act of sence, and an act of reason, an act of nature, and an act of grace. To heare one requesting and praying is to grant: and to heare one counselling and commanding, is to o­bey. When God heares man, he grants; and when man heares God, or heares men speaking in the name of God, he yeelds and obeys.

It followes, And know thou it for thy good. The Hebrew is, know it for thy selfe. Now, because that which a man knowes for [...] himselfe, is for his profit, therefore we translate, know it for thy good; that is, know it as that, whereby thy selfe mayest receive good. The meaning of, know it for thy selfe, is not this, know and keep it to thy selfe, let none partake with thee of it; It is against the use of knowledge, that a man should so know for himselfe, though a mans selfe hath or may have good by all he knowes. So we must understand that of Salomon, Prov. 9. 12. If thou be wise, thou shalt be wise for thy selfe; that is, thou shalt be advantag'd by thy wis­dome; Wisdome brings in a faire revenew; though many know [Page 401] much and seem very wise, who know nothing for themselves, and are not wise at all, for their own good.

There are three sorts of knowing men.

First, Some know onely to know. They know, but the propose no end to themselves, beyond knowledge: They know not for the good of others, no nor for their own good. As it is with riches and honour, so with knowledge: covetous men gather riches that they may be rich, they propose not any other end of having riches, but only to be rich. An ambitious man, desires honor, that he may be honourable, he proposeth to himselfe no other end of his desiring honor, but to be honourable. So many are covetous and ambitious of knowledge, they read from book to book, and from point to point, from science to science, and what do they with all this know­ledge? only this, that they may know; to know thus, is not to know for good, To know only to know, is no better then not to know.

Secondly, Others know, that they may be knowne, to know this is their end, that other men may know that they are knowing men, that they are great Schollars, great read-men, men of great abilities and boundlesse studies. Even as some desire riches, that they may be accounted rich, and honour, that they may be fam'd for honourable. To know only that we may be known, is worse then not to know.

But thirdly. That which is the right way of knowing, is to know that others may know, or, to know that our selves may practise. These are the true ends of knowing, to communicate knowledg and to obey knowledge. The great end of knowing should be our own profiting in holinesse and obedience. And so here, Know it for thy good, is, to know it so, as to make an advantage of thy knowledg. To know for our good, is the only good knowledge. Hence observe, first,

Truth deserves our most diligent search.

We have searched it (saith Eliphaz) The promise of finding truth, is only to such as search for truth (Prov. 2. 4.) Thou shalt find wisdome, &c. If thou seekest her as silver, and searchest for her as for hid treasures. There are two places, two veines espe­cially, where truth is to be found; There is the book of Gods word, and the book of Gods works: The book of Scripture, and the book of providence; In these two books, we are to search, in them to study out truth, for our own practise, and for advise to others.

Secondly Observe,

That which we offer to others for truth, we ought diligently to [Page 402] make tryall of our selves; or we should make truth our own, before we distribute it to others

We have searched the thing out (saith Eliphaz) we know the truth to be thus, we are masters of what we teach. They who hear aright, search (as the Bereans) those things, which are taught them; and they who instruct aright, ought to search the things which they teach; If there must be after-searching of those things we hear, certainly there must be fore-searchings of the things we teach. Truth (ordinarily) is not worth the having unlesse it be come in by our own searching. They who receive that for truth which they never searcht, will not hold any truth when themselves are searcht. Truths merely borrowed and taken upon trust, are no stock, no abiding treasure of knowledge; And yet most can only say of all the truth they have, as he of his axe head, (2 Kings 6. 5.) Alas master, for it was borrowed; they snatch up one truth from this hand, and another from that, they take it upon the credit of this and that learned man; very few are able to say (as Eliphaz here) Loe this, we have searched it: The more paines we take to find truth, the more pleasure we take in it; That is sweetest to us, which we sweat most for, in praying and studying: Morsells of Truth dipt in that sawce, fatten and strengthen the soul most.

Observe thirdly,

What a man knoweth by search and disquisition, he is confi­dent of.

We have searched it; and what follows? so it is; He speaks with authority, not timerously, as if he doubted whether it were so or no; but, so it is, we will bide by it, we have it upon enquiry and diligent search. Observe fourthly,

The truths we know our selves, we should communicate unto others.

Here it is, we have searched it, but we will not put the light we have found, under a bushell; we will not hide the talent we have in a napkin: Here it is, make what use of it thou canst, know it for thy good. Observe fifthly,

Truth may challenge credit, and command the eare.

Hear thou it▪ Truth needs not stand begging audience, or creep upon the ground with flattering insinuations, or humble submis­sions to gaine acceptance. Truth is a great Prince, and may speak in the language of Princes; We will, We require; It commands rather then entreats, or all its entreaties commands, every word a [Page 403] law or a charge: Hear thou it. Observe in the sixth place, That

It is needfull to make speciall application of generall doctrinall truths.

Eliphaz had delivered a doctrinall truth, and here he makes ap­plication; And though he failed much, in the application of it to Job, yet there were generall truths very appliable, in the things he delivered. Therefore he stays not in generals, nor leaves his doctrine hovering in the ayre, but brings it home to the heart, and layes it close to the conscience; Hear thou it, and know it thou, for thy good. And not onely are nationall and speculative truths to be brought home and applied, but even common experimentall truths, such were these discussed, and handled by Eliphaz. Observe seventhly,

A man may know much, and yet get no good by it.

Know this for thy good. The Devil is a great Scholler, he knows much, but he knows nothing for his benefit, but all for his hurt. Many a man knowes almost all that is knowable; but he knowes nothing which is (to him) profitable: Nothing gaines by his know­ledge but onely his pride, he is puffed up with knowledge, not built up, and that knowledge which puffes up, will at last puffe down, or cast us down. Eightly Observe,

A godly man, may make a profitable use of any Truth.

You see what truths Eliphaz spake; many of them ordinary, common Doctrines, and many of them sore threatnings and judge­ments upon wicked men, yet know thou this for thy good. There is no veine of Doctrine in the book of God, but a man may make use, yea treasure of it. All truth is so symbolical to the regenerate part, that it cannot but more sublimate and spiritualize a spirituall heart, though it selfe be a truth about things earthly and temporall.

Observe lastly,

All truths, especially truths contained in the promises, are the portion of a godly man.

Know thou it for thy good, saith he; As if he should say, if thou art a godly man, then all the good things I have here spoken of, be­longing to godly men, belong to thee, they are thy portion also. While a believer reads the book of God, he sees great riches, many precious things in the promises, and whatsoever good he findes there, there is nothing of it too good for him; he may know it all for his own good; those sweet delicious promises of the pardon of sin, of the love of God▪ of the freenesse of grace, of the glory to come, the promises of Christ, and of all that is Christs, all these [Page 404] things are his, when he reads them, he may set his mark upon them, and know them for his goods, know them as his own proper goods. Unbelievers are strangers to the promises, and the promises are as strange to them, they know not the promises, and the promi­ses will not know them: They know not a letter of Scripture for their good. The very promises are threatnings to them, and the very blessings of the book of God, are their curse. As the clouds passe over this and that piece of ground, and then dissolve upon a third, by the directing and all disposing providence of God: So the promises (which are full of blessings, full of comforts, as the clouds are of showers) passe over a wicked mans head, and let not down one drop of mercy or comfort upon him, but leave him like the dry hearth, or barren wildernesse, which seeth not when good cometh, Jer. 17. 6. But when the cloud moves a little farther, and meets with the family or person of a godly man, there it dissolves and powreth out a plentifull raine (both of temporall and spiri­tuall blessings) to refresh and confirme that inheritance of the Lord, Psal. 68. 9.

And so much for this fifth Chapter, wherein, with the fourth, we have handled the first part of the dispute undertaken against Job, by Eliphaz, the first of his three friends. The whole discourse consi­sting of divers arguments, to convince and humble him under the hand of God: of divers counsels and motives to perswade and di­rect him to seek unto God, and submit to his correcting hand: All he was to speak, being let in, by a loving preface, and all he spake, being ratified, with an assuring conclusion, that all he had spoken was for his good, if he would hear, believe and obey. In the next Chapters we shall hear Job making his defence, scattering the charge thus brought against him, stiffely maintaining, and impor­tunately renewing his first complaint.

JOB, Chap. 6. Vers. 1, 2, 3.

But Job answered, and said.

O that my griefe were throughly weighed, and my calamity laid in the ballances together.

For now it would he heavier than the sand of the sea, there­fore my words are swallowed up, &c.

THis sixth Chapter begins Jobs replication, which is con­tinued to the end of the seventh. He replies exactly to the severall parts of the charge, given by Eliphaz, who in the two fore-going Chapters, undertook both to re­prove the impatience of Job, and to advise him a more holy and better temper'd carriage, towards God, under his afflictions. In this reply, Job shapes and formes up answers unto both. I shall endeavour to give you a briefe of the whole, and then to parti­culars.

First, Job enters with a refutation of those reproofes of impati­ence, which Eliphaz had heap't upon him; and with that subjoyns a refusall of the counsels (in his sence) which he had given him. In this work, seven verses of the Chapter are spent.

Secondly, We have a renovation or a re-inforcement of his grief and desire to die, from the 8 to the end of the 13 verse, O that I might have my request, that God would cut me off, &c. As if he had said, I am so far, from being satisfied, with what thou hast spoken against me, or from recanting and recalling, what I have spoken, in those my breathings after death, that I will be bold to make the same suit to God againe, O that I might have my request, and that God would cut me off! &c.

Thirdly, He proceeds to a charge of rash censure, of uncharita­ble, yea of deceitfull dealing upon his friends, from the 13 unto the 24 verse. To him that is afflicted (saith he) pity should be shewed from his friend, my brethren have dealt deceitfully, as a brooke, &c.

Fourthly, He yet submits himself to their judgement and dire­ction, [Page 406] if they would speak reason to him at last, and come home to his case indeed; or, if they could fully and candidly discover to him any errour, he was willing to be rectified; This he profes­ses (and it is a most ingenious profession) in the 24. and 25. ver­ses, Teach me (saith he) and I will hold my tongue, and cause me to understand wherein I have erred, &c. As if he had said, All that you have spoken hitherto, doth not reach my condition, ye have quite mistook my case; yet, you shall see, I doe not stand out against you, because I will stand out, it is not my will that oppo­ses what you have spoken, but my understanding; therefore, if you can shew me better reason, I lay down the bucklers, and yield my selfe a prisoner to your selves, and unto truth. I delight not to lengthen out contentions, nor am I resolved to have the last word, Teach me, and I will hold my tongue.

Fifthly, He adds an expostulation, mixed with an aggravation. An expostulation about, and an aggravation of their high jealousie, and low opinion of him, in the 26. and 27. verses, Doe ye imagine to reprove words, and the speeches of one that is desperate, which are [...] wind? As if he had said, Doe you think, that you have had to deale with a man, that onely makes a noyse, or speaks a great ma­ny words, which have more sound then sence: doe ye think I am out of my wits, and in stead of arguing with you, doe onely rave like a mad man at you? Ye have not had vaine, windy words from me, but words full of weight and matter, words of truth and sober­nesse, wherefore then doe you speak thus? Doe ye imagine to re­prove words, and the speeches of one that is desperate? Doe ye think I speak like one, who knows not what he speaks? Or that, I have at once lost my hope, and my understanding?

Sixthly, He gives them advice and admonition to take better heed, to what they should after say, if they intended to to say any more, or to continue their counsell and discourse with him; in the three last verses of this sixth Chapter. Now therefore be content, looke upon me, for it is evident to you, if I lie, returne I pray you, &c.

In the 7th, (which concludes his speech) he offers three things, especially to be observed.

First, A renewing of many arguments and considerations, by which he confirmes the equity of his request, to have his life cut off; upon which sad subject he insists, from the beginning of the Chapter, to the end of the 17th verse. Is there not an appointed [Page 407] time to man upon the earth? Are not his dayes like the dayes of an Hireling? &c.

Secondly, After all his high straines of contest with man, we have an abasement of himselfe, as unworthy that God should take notice of him, either by mercies or judgements, in the 18. and 19. verses. What is man, that thou shouldst magnifie him, and that thou shouldest visit him every morning? &c. A godly man will stand (when he sees cause) upon his termes with men, but he ever falls low before, and hath not a word to reply against God. He is sometime angry, when men vilifie him, but he ever admires, why God should magnifie him. What is man, &c.

Thirdly, He concludes his speech with an humble acknowledge­ment of his own sinfulnesse, and with an earnest request for the par­don of his sin. Lord (saith he) I have sinned, what shall I doe un­to thee, O, thou preserver of men, vers. 20, &c. After all this heat and passion, after all these complainings, Jobs heart lay levell be­fore the Lord, yea he abases himselfe to exalt and give glory to God, with humble confession, and an earnest supplication for the pardon of his sin. Thus we have the generall parts and substance of his answer to that charge of Eliphaz, in the two former Chap­ters.

But Job answered and said, &c.

In these words, and the three following verses, Job gives us the re­futation or rejection of that reproof, given him by Eliphaz; And he refutes it by shewing the reason why Eliphaz (as he supposed) was so sharpe and bitter in reproving him. And further, he shews cause why he rejects his counsell or consolation. The reason upon Amicos taxat, quod antequam ipsum reprehen­der ent, non ex­pendissent suam miseriam. Coc. which he puts off those reproofs is this, because Eliphaz had not duly considered his sorrowes, or was not so sensible of them, as a man should be, that undertakes a friend in his condition. The sum of his argument, against what Eliphaz had spoken, may be thus formed;

He cannot duly reprove or convince another of impatience in com­plaining, who hath not fully weighed those calamities, which are the cause and ground of those complaints.

But Eliph. z, thou hast not fully weighed and considered my case and condition, my troubles and calamities, which are the ground and cause of my complaints.

Therefore thou canst not duly reprove or convince me of impa­tience. [Page 408] The Assumption or second Proposition of this argument, is couched in the second verse, O that my griefe were throughly weighed, and that my calamity were laid in the ballances together! As if he had said, I had never received such harsh censures, such a judgement or reproofe, if thou hadst duly weighed my sorrows; if thou hadst faithfully studied my case, thou hadst never rebuked me thus.

The weight of his calamity, himselfe expresseth two ways.

First, Comparatively, at the third verse, by putting it into the ballance with the sand of the sea; For now (saith he) it would be heavier than the sand of the sea.

Secondly, He sets forth the greatness of his calamity, demonstra­tively, by declaring in what manner he had been afflicted, My af­fliction is not an ordinary affliction; I am wounded with the arrows of the Almighty, and those poisoned arrows, and those arrows drinking up my spirits. I have not onely some single great affliction, or many small ones upon me; but, I have terrour, and terrours, yea I have an army of terrours, yea an army of terrours always incamp­ing about me, and charging me continually, why Eliphaz thou didst never clearly consider these things, much lesse hast thou had a sympa­thy or fellow-feeling of them. Thou hast not bin afflicted in my af­flictions: Thou hast not sorrowed my sorrowes, nor wept my tears; Therefore it is, that thou hast so sharply reproved me, and put so much gall and wormwood into thy discourse.

So then, the summe of this first part may be thus given, taking it out of those high and hyperbolicall straines, in which his passion was carried; as if Job had thus answered Eliphaz, It is an easie matter to slight that which a man doth not know, and to thinke o­thers complaine too much, when we our selves feel nothing; but is it any wonder to heare a man groane, that hath a burthen upon his backe, as heavy as the sand of the Sea? Is it any wonder to heare a man cry out, whose flesh is filled with poysoned arrows, shot from a bow, bent and drawn by the arme of omnipotency? Is it any won­der, if that man feare, who is incompast about with terrours? Is it any wonder, if that man be troubled, who hath the terrours of the Almighty incamping about him? Why Eliphaz, thou wouldst not think, that an Oxe or an Asse were reprovable, if the one should low when he hath no grasse, and the other bray when he hath no fodder; if it be so, that the very irrationall creatures doe according to reason, when they complaine upon their wants, doest thou think me desperate [Page 409] or irrationall in complaning of mine? Alas all my fodder and my grasse, all my comforts and refreshings are taken from me: Dost thou not see, how, upon a due consideration of my estate, all thy reproofes may be wiped off from me, or retorted upon thy self? what great matter is it, if thou dost not complain, who sittest at ease and knowest no sorrow? Thou art in green pastures or full barns, thou hast grasse and fodder in abundance, and therefore hast no cause of complaint. Thus in the generall.

But Job answered and said.

To answer, is here taken properly: he answers to a charge, re­proofe, or argument. At the third Chapter; verse the first, when Job beganne to speake, it is said, Job answered and said. In Scripture language answering is often put for speaking, though none have spoken a word or made any proposall before. But here answering is taken in a strict sense, as it notes a reply to some­what before spoken; Job answered and said. Note this from it.

It is the duty of a man to answer, when he is questioned or charged. It is the Ahostles rule (1 Pet. 3. 15.) Be ready alwaies to give an answer to every man, that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you. As a man in duty ought to give a reason of the hope that is in him; so in duty he ought to give a reason of the sorrows that are in him, and of the complaints that proceed from him; We must answer for our passions, as well as for our speeches; we must answer for our sorrows, and for our joyes, and for our feares; as well as for our hope, or for our faith. These must all be answered for, and when any shall charge us about any of these, we must be ready to give a reason of them (as the Apostle advises there, in the case of our hope) with meeknesse and feare.

It is our duty to answer thus, both in reference to our selves and others.

First, It is our duty in reference to our selves, that wee may vindicate that, which should be more precious to us, then the gold of Ophir, our own credit or sincerity, No man ought to de­spise his owne integrity or reputation, so, as not to stand up for it. Therefore Job growes resolute in that point, professing that he would hold his integrity, till he died, he would never let that goe, but answer stiffely for it: It is justice to dis-asperse our selves, and give witnesse to our own wronged innocency. A man is more [Page 410] bound in duty to stand up for himself, then for any other, by how much he is nearer to himself, then to others.

Secondly, It is our duty to answer in respect of others; (and that Job might have an eye unto) namely to satisfie those, who are scandalized, by what we have either done or spoken: Suppose, it be not a scandall given, suppose, it be onely a scandall taken, as this of Job was: Job did nothing purposely to scandalize them, nor any thing, which upon a due consideration, was a scandall, but his friends had taken scandall at what he spake, his impatient complai­nings: therefore he was bound in duty to satisfie them, and to shew further grounds, wherefore he so complained. Silence when we Si accusatus non respondeat aut criminis convi­ctus aut certé suspectus videatur. Pined. are charged, either makes a full conviction, or strengthens suspition; And in this case, if Job had held his peace, he had either yeelded the cause, and confes'd himself guilty, or at least his friends should have had cause to grow higher in their jealousies of his sincerity. To right our selves is not a point of indifferency, but of dutie. Selfe-love is the rule of our love to others. He who neglects his own wronged ho­nour, will not be very carefull (which yet he ought) of his neigh­bours.

O that my griefe were throughly weighed!

Griefe may be considered two wayes, either Passively or A­ctively. Griefe taken Passively is the thing which we suffer, or, which is grievous to us; affliction it selfe is called griefe. Take griefe Actively, and then it is the sorrow we expresse, under the pressures of grievous afflictions. The word in the Hebrew is trans­lated sometimes anger, sometimes indignation, sometimes wrath. [...] Ira, indignatio hoc loco, ira est que [...] imonia valde iracunda vel molestia, quam ex morbi & ulcer is gra­vitate concipie­hat. Merc. Notat dolorem quem quis capit ex re adversa & displicenti. Coc. It is the same which Eliphaz useth, Chap. 5. v. 2. where he saith, Wrath killeth the foolish man; Eliphaz began his speech with that word, hinting at Job, as if his wrath and impatience towards God had discovered him for a foole, or a wicked one: Now Job retur­ning answer, begins with the first word of Eliphaz his speech; As if he had said, You told me that wrath kils the foolish man, but O that my anger, or the wrath which you conceive to be in me, that griefe which I have expressed, were fully weighed, you would quickly see, that it is not the anger or wrath of a foole, you would find rea­son for my passion, and that, not the want of wisedome, but the plenty or weight of my griefe hath wrought out these complaints. There­fore my desire is, O that my griefe, O that my sorrows powred forth in my former lamentation were throughly weighed, you have [Page 411] but guessed at them yet, you have not weighed them; or if weigh­ed them, yet not throughly weighed them, you have not weighed them (which you ought) as you would weigh gold, to a grain, or to the turning of the scale: or if so, your beame is not a true one, nor your ballance the ballance of the Sanctuary, you have weigh­ed me, but, by a common beame, or (I fear) by false ballances, and a bagge of deceitfull weights.

O that my griefe.] The Vulgar Latin translates, O that my sins, namely, for which I am thus afflicted were throughly weighed; Ʋtinam peccata mea. Vulg. As if the meaning of Job were to lighten his sin, and to aggravare his suffering: But doubtlesse, that was none of Jobs mind or mea­ning, neither will the originall beare such a translation; when our sins are put into the ballance with our sufferings, all our sufferings, the heaviest we can feele or goe under in this life, are but as a fea­ther to a talent of lead. As all the afflictions of this life are light, in comparison of that exceeding weight of glory, prepared for us in the next life. So all the suffering of this life are light, in compari­son of the exceeding weight of one sin, commited by us. Therefore Job makes no such comparison here, as if he had bin afflicted more than he deserved; That of Ezra concerning the Church of the Jewes (Chap. 9. 13.) Thou our God hast punished us lesse then our iniquities deserve, is true of every punishment; put any punish­ment of this world, spiritual or temporall, in one scale, and the least sin, in another, that lightest sin out-weighs our heaviest punish­ment. Only in hell sins and sufferings shall be of equall poyse. God will then powre and measure our punishments, which shall come up to the proportion and demension of our sins, and what the creature cannot bear at once in weight, shall be weighed to him in eternity. But to passe that rendring, as unsafe.

O that my griefe were throughly weighed.

Our English word, scale, which is the instrument, by which we [...] Libravit, ponde­ravit, olim mo­neta libraeba­tur & ex pon­dere habebatur summa pecuniae. ut mini ex nu­mero nummo­rū, Ulpian. weigh, is well conceived to come from the Hebrew word here u­sed (Shakal) signifying to weigh any thing, but especially to weigh coyne or mony, to weigh gold and silver; As Gen. 23. 16. Abraham upon the purchace of that field, which he bought of the children of Heth, for a burying place, weighed to Ephron the sil­ver, which he had named. It was the custom of those times, in stead of telling, to weigh their mony, and that was the most exact and ready way of paiment: And from that word (Shakal) signifying [Page 412] to weigh money, comes the Hebrew word for one speciall sort of mony, the Shekel, because they weighed by the shekel, that be­ing as their standard or a special coyne, of such a known weight and value, that all their coyne was weighed and valued by it. So in Siclus moneta certi ponderis & omnium pon­derum regu [...]a. the Latin and likewise in our English, we call one speciall summe of mony, A pound, which is a weight, and by which mony is com­monly accounted and paid. And hence by a Metaphor, this word signifies to judge or to consider of a thing exactly▪ and fully, be­cause of all matters that men weigh, they will weigh gold and sil­ver most exactly; if a man weigh gold, he weigheth it to a graine, if gold want but the turning of the scale, more then due weight or allowance, it will not passe, Isa. 33. 18. Where is the Scribe, where Ʋil begis verba ponderant. Sanc. Quaestor praefe­ctus aeratio mi­litari. Jun. is the Receiver; The Hebrew is, Where is the weigher; that is, either the spirituall weigher; He that uses to be so exact in weigh­ing every tittle of the law. Or, the Civill weigher, because they u­sed to weigh all the mony, they received. So then, O that my griefe were throughly weighed, is as if he had said, O that my grief were weighed, as gold and silver is weighed, weighed exactly, to the least, to the utmost, that you might fully know what it is.

The word single by it selfe, notes an exact examination by weighing, but when (as here) the word is doubled, or (by an Hebraisme) repeated, O that my griefe in weighing were weighed, it heightens and increases the sense exceedingly: Hence we translate O that my griefe were throughly weighed, weighed so, as that there might be a cleare discovery, how much my sorrows weigh. The doubling of a word, to this sence, is very frequent in Scripture, I shall not need to instance. Take only that (Gen. 2. 17.) Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evill, thou shalt not eat of it, for in the day that thou eatest thereof, in dying, thou shalt die, (that is) thou shalt surely die; So here, O that in weighing it were weigh­ed, that is, O that it were throughly and exactly weighed

Lay all together, and it imports thus much; as if Job had said, I would not have my sorrows weighed at a vulgar beame, or in or­dinary ballances, I would not have the sound or letter only of what I have spoken considered, but I desire that you would take my complaints together, the words and the matter, and that you would weigh all impartially, that you may come to a full under­standing, what my condition is; and then surely you would give up a better judgement, and make a fairer interpretation of my [Page 413] words, then as yet you have put forth: Thus he speaks also Chapter. 31 6. Let me be weighed in an even ballance, that God may know my integrity. Uneven ballances will not make a perfect discovery: That which is false, cannot give a true report: Things and persons act as they are; therefore Job desireth to be weighed in an even ballance, such a beame will speake the truth of my e­state, both to God and man; God needs no meanes to make him know, he knowes all immediately, and he weighes by his eye, not one thing by another, but all things in themselves; Job speakes of God after the manner of men

And my calamity laid in the ballances together.

My griefe and my calamity. Griefe caused by my calamity, and calamity the cause of that griefe.

My calamity. The word signifies any troublesome evil, sad e­vent, [...] or accident, vulgularly called a mis-fortune; O that this sad à radice [...] estate and condition wherein I am, were put into the ballance.

The Originall for ballances, is very observeable; As there is fuit, eventus malus, infortu­nium. [...] Trutina, statera quod duas sc. habeat lances, velvt aures Pagn. much elegancy, in the word by which the action, so, in this, by which the instrument of weighing is express'd. It is found only in the plurall, or duall number, as many of that nature are; The same word in Hebrew, signifies also the eares, which are the organ of hearing; and the reason of it is thus given, because as the tongue of the ballance stands like a judge between the two scales, inclining to neither till the weight be laid in; so should the eare of a Judge by office, or of any man, by deputation, called to heare and determine of things in difference, stand indifferent to both parties, till he heare the matter debated, and the reasons brought forth on either side. The Moralists embleme this, by the place of that Signe in the Zodiacke, which they call the Virgin, standing (according to the doctrine of Astronomers) between the Lion and the Bellances; The Lion bids Virgin Justice, be stout and fearelesse; The Ballan­ces advise her to weigh the matter on both sides, with moderati­on, [...] and be cautious, inclining neither one way nor other, but as the merit of the cause, fully heard, shall sway her judgement. à radice [...].

Job desires, that his calamity might be layed thus in the ballan­ces, Levavit, su­stulit, nam qui appendit ali quid tollit lan­ces in altum, Drus. before his sentence; Laid; The word is, O that my calamity might ascend in the ballances; And that manner of speaking is used, either because in weighing, the lighter scale of the ballances doth ascend, or because when things are weighed, the ballances [Page 414] ascend or are lifted up: A man takes up the ballances in his hand to weigh; So it is, as if he had said, O that these, might be poised to­gether and lifted up, to see which way the scales will turne.

Together. There is some difference in opinion about that word [...] Pariter vel po­tius similiter. Nulla ejus par­te praeter missa. Together, whether he meaneth thus; O that all my griefe and ca­lamity were weighed, you consider things to halves, and leave out those points which are most weighty and material; you should take in all together, Or whether his desire be, that his griefe and calamity, both together, might be put into one ballance, and the sand of the sea into another, and so an experiment be made, whe­ther his griefe and calamity, or the sand of the sea were heavier. Or thirdly, Whether thus, that his griefe should be put into one ballance, and his calamity into another, and then triall be made which of those two were heavier, his griefe and sorrow, or his ca­lamity and trouble. A learned interpreter conceives, that Iob Mercerus. wishes his griefe and calamity might both together be put into one ballance, and all the sand of the sea (if it were possible) in the other, supposing that his griefe and calamity would out-weigh that vast ponderous aggregated body. His opinion is chiefely strengthned by some difficulties in the Gramatical construction, unlesse this be admitted; and yet if it be, a greater difficulty is shewed by a second, and therefore I rather take it thus; O that Bolduc. my griefe and calamity were laid in the ballances together, that is, O that my griefe were put, one into one ballance, and my calamity into another; or, O that my griefe might be weighed with my ca­lamity, and it would appeare (notwithstanding your judgement of me) that yet, there is nothing so much weight in my greife, as there is in my calamity, that is, I have not yet grieved or complai­ned up to the height or weight of those calamities, which are upon me: So that if my sorrow were laid in one ballance, and my affli­ction in another, my affliction would outweigh my sorrow, and it would appeare, that I have complained, not only, not without a cause, but not so much, as I had cause.

And to prove that his calamity was heavier then his griefe, he adds in the next words; It, (namely his calamity thus weighed) would be heavier then the sand of the sea: As if he had said, it is possible that in trying all heavy things, somewhat might be found heavier then my griefe or my complaint hath been; but I am sure nothing can be found of equal weight with my calamity, for my ca­lamity (which is the immediate antecedent) would be heavier than [Page 415] the sand of the sea, then which, nothing can be found more heavy.

That of David, Psal. 62. 9. is paralell to this expression in Job, Surely men of low degree are vanity, and men of high degree are a lye; To be laid in the ballances, they are altogether lighter then vanity. The meaning is, That if men of all degrees, high and low were put in one scale, and vanity in the other, vanity it selfe would be weightier then the gravest and most weighty men: Hence some reade, They together are lighter then vanity; Others to this sence, Men and vanity being weighed together, vanity will not be so light, as vaine man. As David, to shew mans lightnesse, makes him lighter then the lightest thing, vanity. So Iob, to shew the heavinesse of his calamity, makes it heavier then the heaviest thing, the fand of the sea. Observe hence; first,

That it is a duty, to weigh the sad estate, and afflicted condition of our brethren thoroughly.

But (you will say) what is it to weigh them throughly?

I answer, It is not only to weigh the matter of an affliction, to see what it is, which aman suffers; but to weigh an affliction in every circumstance and aggravation of it; The circumstance of an affliction, is often more considerable then the matter of the affli­ction. If a man would confesse his sins, and confesse them through­ly, he is to confesse, not only the matter of them; as sins are the transgressions of the Law, and errors against the rule, but he must eye the manner, in which sin hath been committed, the circum­stances with which it is cloathed, these render his sin out of mea­sure, and out of weight sinful. Likewise would a man consider the mercies and favours received from God, would he know them throughly, and see how much they weigh? let him look not only what, but how, and when, and where, and by whom he hath re­ceived them. There may be (and often is) a great wickedness in a little evil committed, and a great mercy in a little good received. As relations, so circumstances have the least entitie, but they have the greatest efficacie. Now, as there is often more in the circumstan­ces, than in the matter of a sin, or of a mercy so, there is often more in the circumstance, than there is in the matter of an affliction, therefore, he that would thoroughly weigh the afflictions of ano­ther, must consider all these accidents, as wel as the substance of it. As namely, the time when sent, the time how long endured, whe­ther a single affliction, or in conjucture with other afflictions, the strength of the patient, and the dependencies that are upon him.

Secondly, He that would weigh an affliction throughly, must put himselfe in the case of the afflicted, and (as it were) make ano­thers griefe, his owne. He must act the passions of his brother, and a while personate the poore, the sick, the afflicted man. He must get atast of the wormwood, and of the gall, upon which his brother fee­deth. In a word, He must lay such a condition to heart: The Pro­phet Malachy threatens a curse upon those, who laid not the word and works of God to heart (Chap. 2. 2,) I will curse your blessings (saith the Lord) because ye doe not lay it to heart; that is, ye doe not consider, what I say or doe, throughly: God cursed them throughly, because they would not throughly consider His Laws and judgements: So then, to weigh the affliction of another throughly, is to put our soules, as it were, in their soules stead: Hence, that we may be assured, Christ hath throughly weighed all our afflictions, He is said to be afflicted in all our afflictions; He doth not only intuitively consider or contemplate them, but he is (though above enduring) as, actually enduring them. He is af­flicted in all our afflictions, that is, he considers our afflictions as his owne, and is affected with them, as if himselfe were pained with all our paines: and therefore it is said, that himselfe tooke our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses, Mat. 8. 17. the meaning is, he weighed the griefe of his people fully. In these two points, this holy art of weighing griefe consists, consideration of circum­stances, and simpathy of the smart. Meere speculation moves little. We have no feeling of anothers suffering, till we have a fellow-feeling. The bare Theory of affliction, affects no more, then the bare Theory of fire, heates.

Secondly, When Job saith, O that my griefe were throughly weiged; we may observe,

That it is an addition to a mans affliction, when others are not sen­sible of his affliction. For it is, as if Job had said; This makes me cry out so much of the weight of my sorrows, because my friends weigh them so little. The Church (Lam. 1. 12.) complaines thus, Is it nothing to you, all ye that passe by? behold and see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow. Is it nothing to you? as if the Church had said; My affliction is something to me, and this aflicts me, above all my affliction, that passengers and behol­ders slight my calamities, and think my affliction no affliction; that is, not so great, as indeed it is: Or, it is nothing to them, (they are not toucht with it) how great soever, they see it is to me: That [Page 417] which wounds and breakes my heart, doth not prick their little fingers. And because, man is so ready to afflict his brother with this negative affliction, a not being sensible of his afflictions, therefore the Apostle assures us (Heb. 4. 15.) That we have not an High Priest that cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities, but was in all points tempted like as we are. This is spoken to comfort the Saints in their extreamest sufferings; what though men will not take notice and be sensible of your condition? what though men will not weigh your griefe? yet Christ will; our High Priest, is none of your senselesse Priests, who care not what weather the People endure, so they be warme and at ease. Thirdly observe;

We can never rightly judge, till we throughly weigh the condition of an afflicted brother. For Job conceiv'd that Eliphaz proceeded to judgement, before he had been in consideration. This is the reason why thou hast judged me uncharitably, because thou hast not weighed me seriously. To shew, that consideration must goe before judgement, God himselfe is exprest to us, in Scripture con­sidering the state of things, before himselfe judges. So Gen. 11th in the case of the builders of Babel, and Gen. 18•h in the case of the men of Sodome, it is said, that the Lord came downe to see, whether they had done altogether, according to that cry, which was come up unto him; Not, as if the Lord moves from one place to another, from Heaven to earth, for he filleth all places; not that the Lord needs come down to receive information, or to examine his own intelligence, to see whether things are, as they are repor­ted; but, it is only an allusion to the manner of men, or, to shew, that he doth not censure or judge any man, or men, or Nations, till he hath taken a full cognisance of their condition. Now if God, who is infinite in knowledge and wisdome, represents himselfe coming downe, and by degrees deliberating about and weighing the estates of men, before he censures them, what need then have blindfold men, ignorant men, men, who at best have much dark­nesse mixed with their light, what need (I say) have they to examine, weigh and try every mans estate, before they sentence or determine it? Fourthly observe;

A man, who hath not been, or is not afflicted himselfe, can hard­ly apprehend, what another endures, who is under affliction.

As there are comforts, especially spirituall comforts, which no man knows or can know, but by the enjoying of them: The white [Page 418] stone (promised, Rev. 2. 17.) hath a new name written in it, which no man knowes, saving he that receiveth it; A man that is a stran­ger to Christ and his wayes, is not able to make any judgement what the comforts and refreshings of a Christian are. He admires to heare men speak of spirituall comforts and consolations, he knowes not the meaning of those things. The naturall man re­ceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, because they are spiritu­ally discerned, 1 Cor. 2. 14. It is so (proportionably) in all sor­rowes and afflictions, especially in spirituall sorrowes and afflicti­ons, which lye off from sence, yea, which lye quite beyond the reach and borders of reason: spirituall sorrowes, the hidings of Gods face, the withdrawing of assistance, few pity in others, be­cause few have had experience of these things, in themselves. They think men are mad, when they complaine of such afflictions; when they cry out of their sins, of the want of the favour of God, and the shining of his love, of deadnesse and coldnesse in duty, of un­beleefe and hardnesse of heart, &c. And therefore our Lord Je­sus, to assure our hearts that he hath a full sence of all our sorrows, tasted himselfe of our sorrowes. There is not any sorrow that can be upon any soul, or any affliction that can be upon the body, but our Lord Jesus hath had (some way or other) an experience of it: This makes him (to our apprehensions) most fit to judg and com­passionate the distresses of his people. As all the sins of his people were laid upon him, so all their sorrowes were laid upon him too; therefore the Prophet Isaiah describes him thus, Ch. 53. 3. A man of sorrowes and acquainted with griefe; Griefe and he were no strangers, while he was here upon the earth, griefe was his ac­quaintance and Familiar (as it were) that went up and down with him, all the while he travelled here below. Therefore seeing it is so, the whole church and every particular believer, have strong con­solation in their sorrows, that the Lord Jesus Christ doth through­ly weigh their condition, and knoweth fully what it is, We have not (as was toucht before) an High-Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; why, what assurance have we of this? it followes, He was tempted in all things like un­to us, yet without sin. Christ had temptations unto sin, yet without sin, therefore he knowes how to succour us, when we are temp­ted unto sin; Christ was tempted by manifold sorrowes, there­fore he knowes how to succour us, when we are under manifold sorrowfull temptations: If we had a Mediatour in Heaven [Page 419] that had not been tempted on earth, we might doubt whether he would be toucht with the feeling of our infirmities, whether sin­ning infirmities, or sorrowing infirmities. And were it not, that some of the Saints have been tempted and tryed, they, who are un­der tryals and temptations, would find none on earth, to succour them. As God doth comfort some in all their tribulations, that they may be able to comfort them, which are in any trouble, with the same comforts wherewith they themselves are comforted of God, 2 Cor. 1. 4. So he afflicts them, that they might pity and helpe others, as being under the same troubles, with which themselves have been affli­cted. A man that hath only traveld in Geographicall books and Maps, is not able to give you such lively descriptions of, or directi­ons about forreigne Countries, as he that hath traveld to, and been upon the places; so, they who have read and studied much a­bout afflictions, can never give such enlivening, strengthening, heartning counsell, as they, who have been afflicted, and have dwelt sometime upon the Land of sorrowes, To passe on.

For now it would be heavier than the sand of the Sea.

That is, it would be most heavy. Who can tell how heavy that is which is heavier then the heaviest?

If my calamity (saith Job) were weighed, it would have been found heavier, than the sand of the Sea, that account would be gi­ven of it; though you (my friend Eliphaz) seeme to account it as light as a feather.

The sand of the Sea is applied three wayes in Scripture,

First, to set forth an exceeding great number, (Gen. 22. 17.) I will multiply thy seed as the Starres of the Heaven, and as the sand which is upon the Sea shore. That is, I will exceedingly mul­tiply thy seed, thy children shall be not only numerous, but num­berlesse; Though a book of Numbers be written concerning Abrahams posterity, yet their totall number is not written. So (Psal. 78. 27.) He rained flesh upon them as dust, and feathered fowles like as the sand of the Sea, that is, he rained aboundance of feathered fowles.

Secondly, The sand of the Sea, is used to expresse the largnesse, the mighty extent or capacity of a thing; The sand of the Sea, is of a vaster extent, then the Sea it self, as being the outward line or bound of it; therefore (Jer. 33. 22.) it is spoken of, as a thing impos­sible, for the sand of the sea to be measured; As the host of Heaven [Page 420] (sc. the Starres) cannot be numbred, neither the sand of the Sea measured, so will I multiply the seed of my servant David. Measure is taken both of the content, and extent of things; The sand of the Sea is immeasurable both wayes, it cannot (as we speak of humane impossibles) be measured by the pole or by the vessell. And in 1 King. 4. 29. it is said, God gave Salomon wisdome and understan­ding exceeding much, and largenesse of heart as the sand of the Sea, that is, as the sand incompasses and takes the Sea in its armes, so Salomon had a heart, comprehending all the depths and oceans of knowledge; he had the compasse of all learning in his understan­ding. Hence, when a man attempts a thing impossible, we say to him proverbially. Thou measurest the sand. Are [...]am meti­ris.

Thirdly, The sand of the Sea is applied in Scripture, to note the exceeding weight and heavinesse of a thing: that instance is preg­nant for it (Prov. 23. 7.) A stone is heavy, and the sand is weigh­ty, but a fooles wrath is heavier than both; when Salomon would Stulti mores [...]ntolerabiles. shew us, how intollerably burthensome, the manners of a wic­ked man are, he compares them to a stone and to the sand; The wrath of a wicked man is very weighty, but (by the way) the wrath of God is incomparably more weighty: Wrath pro­ceeding from extreame folly, is weighty, but wrath proceeding▪ from infinite wisdome, is infinitely weighty; The wrath of a foole upon his brother, is heavier then a stone, or then the sand; How heavy then will the wrath of the most wise God be, upon that foole?

It is further considerable, that, he saith not barely, heavier than Triplex est a­ [...]enae genus fos­s [...]ia, flavialis & Marina, Plin. lib. 3 na [...] hist. cap. 23. the sand, (any sand is very heavy) but heavier than the sand of the Sea: Rivers have sand, and dry pits have sand, but sea-sand is the vastest and the heaviest sand.

Againe, He speakes not in the singular number, Heavier then the sand of the Sea; but (the Hebrew is plurall) heavier than the sand of the Seas; as if Job had said, if thou shouldest shovell up all the sand, that is upon the shores of all the seas together on a heap, it would not be so heavy, as my calamity; In such Hyperbolies or high strains of eloquence, Job rhetoricates about his sad condition, as if he resolved to put more weight into his expressions, as he found more weight put into his afflictions. Hence observe,

Afflictions are heavy burthens. The judgements of God upon wicked men, are frequently in Scripture called burthens, and they are heavy burthens; Isa. 15. 1. we read of the burthen of Moab, [Page 421] that is, the judgement and calamity that should fall upon Moab; And Isa. 17. 1. The burden of Damascus. And Isa. 19. 1. The burden of Egypt. And Isa. 21. 1. The burden of the desert of the Sea. And afterwards, The burden of the valley of vision, that is of Jerusalem; And (2 King. 9. 25.) when Jehu had kil­led Jehoram, he said to Bidkar his Captaine: Take up and cast him in the portion of the field of Naboth the Jezreelite, for remem­ber, how that when I and thou rode together after Ahab his father, the Lord laid this burden upon him; That is, that he should be slaine and throwne out in this manner. As afflictions upon wic­ked men are burdens; So, afflictions upon the godly are burdens too, they are also heavy burdens: Their sinnes are burdens upon them, My sinnes (saith David) are gone over my head, they are a burthen too heavy for me to beare, Psal. 38. 4. Their sins are burdens and their sorrowes are burdens. Sin doth not on­ly burden man, but it burthens God, I am pressed under your sinnes, as a cart is pressed, that is full of sheaves, saith God, Amos 2. 13. As man, by sin burthens God, so God, by affliction burthens man. But of all afflictions, inward afflictions are the greatest bur­thens: As the spirit of a man is stronger then his flesh, so the affli­ctions which are upon his spirit are weightier then those that are upon his flesh: The spirit hath wonderfull strength, all spirits are strong: Angells are mighty in strength, One good Angel is an o­ver-match for all men. And the devils (who are spirits) are cal­led not not only Principalities but powers, because of their strength. Proportionably, the spirit of man hath a mighty strength in it, and so the afflictions, which are upon the spirit, may have a greater weight in them. The affliction which Job complains of, as hea­vier then the sand, was not so much the calamity that pressed his flesh, or the paine that tormented his body (as is plaine in the next verse) but it was the calamity of his spirit, the affliction lying there, A man can sustaine his infirmity, but a wounded spirit, (that is, when a man hath got a blow, a wound, an affliction upon his spirit) who can beare? Pro. 18. 14. As if Salomon had said, I chal­lenge all the world to find me out a man, that can bear a burdened wounded spirit; unlesse Christ put under his hand, no strength of mans spirit can bear the burthen of a wounded spirit; A spirit hath no weight at all, only fleshly and materiall substances are ponde­rous; but a wounded spirit is heavier then wounded flesh. The spi­rit is strong enough to beare the burthen'd flesh, but nothing in flesh can beare a burthen'd spirit.

In the close of the verse, we have the effect of this heavy weight of affliction, both spirituall and corporall.

Therefore (saith he) my words are swallowed up. That is, I want words to expresse my griefe. Verba deficiunt quibus mogni­tudinem dolorū exprimam: Nulla possum oratione [...]nse­qui, quanto in­fester dolore. Merc. Vix satis esse queant tanto jā verba dolori. All language is too narrow for the vastnesse of my sorrows.

Some reade it, Propterea ver­ba mea ama [...]a, Symmach. Therefore my words are bitter, or therefore my words are steep'd in bitternesse, as if he had said, I my self feed up­on bitter things, I feed upon gall and wormewood, therefore no wonder, if my words tast of them.

The Vulgar goes farther from the letter of the Text, rendring, Proptereaver­ba mea sunt dolore plena. Vul. Therefore my words are full of sorrow; as if he had said, the sor­rows which are in my mind, flow out upon my tongue. The Sep­tuagint yet further off. [...], Sep. Therefore it seemes my words are evill, or ill taken. My griefe renders my words more liable to exception or mis-interpretation.

M Broughton translates, Therefore my words come short, there is a weight upon me heavier than the sand of the sea, Therefore my words come short, or my expressions come not up to my intention. We translate near that sence and answerably to the originall, My words are swallowed up.

The Hebrew word signifies to lick up, or to swallow downe, and [...] a radice [...] Lambit absor­buit per Meta­phoram perdidit corrupit. by a Metaphor to destroy or to consume; in the prophecy of Oba­diah, vers. 16. The word is used to that purpose, They shall drink and they shall swallow downe; And Prov. 20. 25. It is a snare to the man, who devoureth that which is holy, or who swalloweth downe that which is holy: So here, Therefore my words are swal­lowed up, that is, when I would speake, my words are, as it were, halfe-eaten before spoken, or my words are snatcht downe in the Verba semesa. Jun. speaking, by the sharpe teeth and devouring stomack of my griefe and sorrowes.

Others from the letter reade, Therefore my words are corrup­ted, Verba mea cor­rupta sunt, aut pe [...]dita R. Levi deleta R. Moy­ses intercisa, Theod Lasta. Chald. Verbum per [...]i­n [...]t ad pronunciationem cor­rupt [...]m & ad [...]albuti [...]m, wearied, l [...]st, blotted, blubber'd, so cut-off, that I cannot speak distinctly, alluding unto those that stammer. A stammerer is in such haste to speake, that he eats his words, and (as we use to say proverbially in our language) he clips the Kings English, he swal­loweth up halfe his mind, when he would bring it out in words; such is the meaning of Job, My words are swallowed up, I cannot speak all: my griefe takes me off, and cuts me short. And so he seemes to excuse himselfe.

First; in case he had spoken abruptly and brokenly, my paine [Page 423] hath been so great, that I can hardly speake, therefore take no ad­vantage Vix loqui pos­sam, vox fauci­b [...]a haeret, Vat. of the abrupt language and broken sentences, which have fallen from me, for the truth is, my griefe hath swallowed up my words. I have rather sighed then declared my mind; reall sorrow as well as poeticall passionate imitation of sorrow makes many an (Ap siopesis or) sudden stop and breach, when the tongue is up­on the swiftest speed, and quickest motion.

And secondly, he seemes to excuse himselfe for the matter of his speech, I have not yet spoken all my mind, I have not given you my full sense, about my condition: for through griefe I was forced to swallow up my words, and to suppresse what I had fur­ther to say Therefore suppose my speech hath been imperfect, yet be not scandalized at it, for if you will have patience to stay, I shall anone bring up the words againe, which my sorrowes have snatcht from me and swallowed downe. Stay a while, and you shall heare more, you shall heare all, I will speake more largely and more distinctly than I have done. One of the Rabbins takes the Rab. Kimchi. words actively, and referrs the act of swallowing to Jobs friends; as if he had said, Yee my friends have swallowed down my words. Ye have not leasurely fed upon and digested them, but swallowed them in such hast, that ye have not tasted them. As a man that swallowes down a morsell greedily without chewing, never tastes either the sweetnesse or the bitternesse of it. It is a usuall Meta­phor. to expresse hearing by eating; and we have it (as many in­terpret) at the sixth verse of this Chapter, Can that which is un­savoury be eaten without salt. It is a truth, that when words are thus swallowed or gobled downe, we take not out the strength or intent of them. But I stay not upon this exposition, because it strains too hard upon the grammaticall construction, and other circumstances, of the Text.

Observe out of the former meaning.

First, Great griefe interrupteth speech, and makes broken language; Therefore my speech or my words are swallowed up. As sometimes our words devoure so sometimes our words are de­voured; some men speake swallowing words, and others swallow their words, (Psal. 57. 4.) Thou lovest all devouring words, or thou lovest all swallowing words, O thou deceitfull tongue. There are swallowing words, as well as swallowed words. Malice makes a man swallow the integrity of another with his words; And grief will make a man swallow downe his own words, so that he can­not [Page 424] speake to maintaine his own integrity.

Secondly, observe, That some afflictions exceed all complaints and are too bigge for expression. That note reaches M Broughtons sence, my words come short of what my condition is, there is no lan­guage large enough, no Oratory eloquent enough to describe or make known my sorrowes.

Lastly, observe, Not to be able to expresse our griefe is an in­crease of our griefe. Therefore my words are swallowed up. This is an addition to my sorrowes, that I cannot make knowne my sorrowes. It is a great part of my trouble, that I can tell you but a part of my trouble. Let a man be hindred from expressing his griefe, either through want of power, or through the restraint of power, both wayes griefe increases. Some, who have been dying Apud Sophoclē electra faelicem vocat Niobem, cui lugere filio­rum inter [...]tum permissum est, cum id sibi ma­tris crudelitas negaverita upon cruell rackes, or under bloudie tortures, have yet esteemed this, beyond all their tortures, that, they might not freely speak out their minds and sorrows: to have their mouthes stopt, was worse to them, then to have their breath stopt. It is a pain to be kept from speaking. To command a man to swallow or eat downe his words, is next to the command of eating and swallowing downe his own flesh. The cruelty of a disease, may gagge a man, as well as the cruelty of a Tyrant. Such is my griefe that my words are swal­lowed up.

JOB Chap. 6. Vers. 4, 5, 6, 7.

For the arrowes of the Almighty are within me, the poyson whereof drinketh up my spirit: the terrours of God doe set themselves in aray against me.

Doth the wilde Asse bray when he hath grasse? Or loweth the Ox over his fodder?

Can that which is unsavory be eaten without salt? Or is there any taste in the white of an Egge?

The things that my soule refused to touch, are as my sorrowfull meate.

JOB continueth his reply and his complaint. He had exprest the greatnesse of his calamity, by comparing it with the sand of the sea for weightinesse; now he proceeds in the same sad aggra­vation by comparing it to an arrow for sharpenesse, and to an ar­my for terriblenesse: For the arrows of the Almighty are within me: The terrours of the Lord set themselves in array against me.

We are in this verse to open a quiver full of poysoned arrowes, and to marshall an army full of divine terrours, The arrows of the Almighty, &c.

An Arrow, is a deadly engine, so called in the Hebrew, from its [...] Sagitta à [...] dimidia­vit, discidit, qaod scindit rem percussa [...]. effect, cutting or wounding. Being taken properly, it is an instru­ment shot out of a Bow, of wood or iron, either for sport or fight. But here figuratively. And arrows in Scripture are taken in a figure divers wayes.

First, For the word of God, Psal 4. 5. Thine arrowes are sharpe in the heart of the Kings enemies, whereby the people fall under thee. That is, thy words are sharpe and peircing, whereby thou convincest and beatest downe sin and sinners, either converting or destroying them. The Rider on the white Horse, going out conquering and to conquer (who, is conceived to be, Truth, or the word of God triumphing) is described, with a Bowe in his hand; Rev. 6. 2.

Secondly, Arrows are put for the bitter and reproachfull words of men, Ps. 64. 3. 4. & Ps. 120. 4. They bend their bowes to shoot their arrows, even bitter words.

Thirdly, For any evill or mischievous purpose, which a man [Page 426] intends or aimes to the hurt of his brother, Psal. 58. 7. When he bendeth his bow to shoot his arrowes, let them be as cut in peeces. Bending of the bow notes the preparing and setting of mischiefe; The arrow shot out of this bent bowe, is the mischiefe acted and finished (Psal. 2.) The wicked bend their bowe, they make ready their arrow upon the string; they prepare mischiefs against their neighbour.

Fourthly For any kind of affliction, judgement or punishment, Zech. 9. 14. And the Lord shall be seene over them, and his arrow shall goe forth as the lightning. Particularly,

1. For Famine, Ezek. 5. 16. When I shall send upon them the e­vill arrowes of famine.

2 For Pestilence, Psal. 91. 5. Thou shalt not be affraid for the terrour by nigbt, nor for the arrow that fleeth by day. What the terrour and the arrow are, is explained in the next verse, which is not an addition of other evils, from which safety is promised, but an explication of the same. The pestilence that walks in darknesse, and the destruction (being the same pestilence) wasting at noone-day. The meaning of all is, Thou shalt be kept or antidoted against the plague both night and day.

3. Those thunder-bolts and haile-stones, which God sends out of the Magazine of heaven, and discharges in his wrath against wic­ked men, are called the arrows of his indignation, 2 Sam. 22. 15. Psal. 144. 6. & Hab. 3. 11. compared with Josh. 10. 11.

Further the arrows of God signifie inward afflictions, troubles of the mind and spirit, God often shoots an arrow, which pier­ces into the very soule. It was said of Joseph, The iron entred in­to his soule. And it is (in this sense) very usuall for the arrowes of God to enter into the soules of his people (Psal. 38. 1, 2.) O Lord rebuke me not in Thy wrath, &c. For Thine arrows sticke fast in me: Where stuck they? He meanes it not of his body, hap­ly, the skin of that was not razed. There is an arrow, which tou­ches not the sides, but stickes fast in the soule of a childe of God.

Understand it here, of the arrowes of affliction; and those either externall, outward calamities, fastning in the flesh of Job; or in­ternall, galling him to the soule and spirit. Therefore he saith, The Haret lateri Le [...]halis arūdo. arrows of the Almighty are within me, the poison whereof drinketh up my spirit.

These arrowes are described in the text two waies.

  • [Page 427]1.
    • From the
      • Efficient cause
        • The arrowes of the Al­mighty.
        • They drink up my spirit.
      • Effect
  • 2:

They are the arrowes of the Almighty, Shaddai; Of which word we have spoken in the former Chapter, verse 17th at large, it being one of the names of God, noting out his power and omni­potence: There he cals them the chastnings of (Shaddai) the Almighty: And here, The Arrowes of (Shaddai) the Almigh­ty,

1. Because, they are sent out from him. His arme bends and draws the bow. And

2. Because of the mighty force and strength, in which they are sent home to the marke. The strength in which those arrowes come, and the depth of the wound which they make, speak an Al­mighty arme drawing the bow. None but an Almighty arme can shoot an arrow thus deep, up to the feathers in the soul and spirit. It is not in the power of all the tyrants in the world to strik or shoot thus deep. The soule of a Saint hath such armour upon it, as no bodily weapon can enter. And therefore the Martyrs, when all was wound in their flesh, spoke and triumph'd, because their spirits were whole, and untoucht. Onely a spirit can shoot arrowes into our spirits.

We finde it frequent among heathen Poets and others, to de­scribe Poetae deos ar­cu, ja [...]ulis, sa­gittis (que) armant, intelligentes quas inserunt mortalibus cla­des, quae feriunt eminus quod propri [...]m Dei videtur, Bold. their gods arm'd with bowes and arrowes. And in that they shadowed their power to wound the minds of men; and to wound them suddenly and secretly. The Scripture describes the true God thus, furnished with his Quiver of arrowes, and his bowe, (Psal. 7. 13.) He ordaineth his arrowes against the persecutors. God [...]ath an arow for the wounding of his enemies, and an ar­row for the wounding of his friends: He hath arrowes for both; and both are wounded; and both are wounded with poyson'd fie­rie arrowes; yet with a vast difference; these are wounded and poyson'd, that they may be healed, and they are wounded and poy­son'd, that they may be destroyed.

  • Arrowes are
    • 1. Swift
      • instruments.
    • 2: Secret
    • 3. Sharpe
    • 4. Killing

I will make mine arrowes drunke without bloud (Deut. 32. 42.) [Page 428] They are instruments drawing bloud and drinking bloud even unto drunkenesse; afflictions are like arrowes in all these properties.

1 Afflictions often come very speedily, with a glance, as an arrow, quick as a thought.

2. Afflictions come suddenly, unexpectedly; an arrow is upon a man afore he is aware: so are afflictions. Though Job saith, The thing he feared came upon him, he looked for this arrow be­fore it came; yet usually afflictions are unlooked for guests, they thrust in upon us, when we dreame n [...]t of them.

3. They come with little noise: an arrow is felt, before, or as soon as it is heard: an arrow flies silently, and secretly, stealing upon and wounding a man, unobserved, and unseen.

Lastly, all afflictions are sharpe, and in their owne nature kil­ling and deadly. That any have good from them, is from the grace of God, not from their nature.

The poyson whereof drinketh up my spirits.

There's the effect of his afflictions. Some reade it, The furie Quarum indig­natio. Vulg. Furor. Sept. Fervor, T [...]gur: plu [...]i [...] Venenū or anger whereof drinkes up my spirit. It may be called the fury and anger of an arrow, because the arrow is often sent in fury and in anger. We reade also of the fire of an arrow or of a fiery arrow, (Ps. 76. 4.) There brakest thou the arrows of the bow. Arrows even firing themselves by the swiftnesse of their motion. [...] Sagitta, ignita, incales­cens motu.

The word of the Text is derived from a roote, signifying to waxe very hot, and in the Nowne heate. Hence by a Metaphor it signifies anger, because angry men waxe hot, Anger is breathed [...] à radice [...] Caluit, incaluit, ira sic dicta quod ira [...] inca [...]escunt. fire. (Isai. 42. 25.) Therefore he hath powred upon them the furie of his anger, and the strength of battell, and it hath set him on fire round about. Fire and fury, are neare in name, and in na­ture. When fury burns within, fire quickly burns without: and so by a Metonymie the same word signifies poison; the reason is, be­cause poisons heat and inflame; poysons inflame the flesh, and (as it were) set the body on fire, or because an angry man (like an an­gry Serpent) seemes to breath out fire, or spet poyson. Paul before his conversion, breathed threatnings, fire and sword against the Church Act. 9. 1. And therefore, either way, the word is well rendred, The anger whereof, or the poyson whereof drinketh up my spirit. And in the Greek the same word signifies anger and Psal. 58. 4. [...] pro [...] Sept. poyson; because of that inflammation, which is about the heart of a man throughly angry.

In these words, Job seemes to allude to the custome of cruell savage men, who, when they pursued their enemies with deadly Venenatis g [...]a­vida sagit [...]is,—pharetra, Hor. Qui mortis sae­vo gem nent ut vulnera causas, Omnia vipereo spicula Felle linunt, Ovid. l. 1. de ponto. Mos erat per­sarum ut po­nant venenum serpentis in sa­gittis suis; R. Solo. [...] hatred and would wound them to death, used to dip the head of their arrows, the top of their speares, or the point of their swords, or whatsoever weapon they fought with, in poison, that so every wound might be a death; The poison of such an arrow, speare or sword, drinks up the spirit, and corrupts the bloud presently. Some poison strikes the heart, almost, as soon as the weapon strikes the arme. Job compares the arrowes, which God shot into him, not to ordinary arrowes, which kill only by piercing, but to poison'd arrowes, which kill by insecting; As if God had set himselfe to the utmost, to powre out the fiercenesse of his indignation upon him; not only shooting an arrow, but an arrow dipt in poison, such an arrow, as the most barbarous and cruell men shoot at their most professed and mortall enemies.

Drinketh up my spirit. Poison gets quickly to the spirit, and there drinks: poison is subtle and spiritfull, and therefore (if I may so speake) incorporates with that which is most subtle in man, his spirit. Flat, pal'd, grosse or dreggish liquor, will not quench the fiery thirst of poison, it drinkes nothing, but pure spirits; yet some reade, It drinketh up my blood; but this amounts to the same senc [...], for the spirit of a living creature is in the blood; the spirits swim in the blood.

There are different opinions about this spirit, or what we are to understand by it.

First, Some take spirit here, for the breath, or for the act of To [...] confossus vulne [...]ibus [...]ix respi [...]are valeo. Aquin. breathing; As if he had said, I have received so many wounds, by these poisoned arrowes, that I begin to faint, and cannot draw my breath, These arrowes sup up my spirit, and by wounding, stop my breath.

Secondly, Others understand it more generally, taking spirit for his strength and vigour; spirits are so strong, that they are put for strength▪ The Aegyptians are men and not God, and their hor­ses flesh and not spirit (Isa. 31. 3.) that is, they are not strength, but weaknesse. So here, it drinketh up my spirit, that is, the strength that is in me, all the powers and abilities of body and Dolores mei [...]c penitus e­nervant, at (que) exhausto robore de [...]iciunt. Pi­ned. soule, are wasted and consumed: These calamities spend upon my spirit, where the stock of my strength is laid up, or which is the lock wherein my strength lies.

A third apprehends, that by spirit, he meanes his judgement, [Page 430] reason and understanding, as if he had said, showers of arrowes and troubles come so thick upon me, that they even darken my mind, and drink up the strength of my understanding; Hence I may seeme to speake distractedly, unadvisedly, weakly; I have not that spirit to quicken, that strength of reason to judge, which formerly I had: the paines of my body, disable and distemper my mind; And therefore if I have spoken any thing below what I ought, it is, because I am cast below what I was.

The terrours of God doe set themselves in array against me.

Arrowes and terrors, are the same thing, in a different cloathing of words: Or the arrow is the affliction it selfe, and the terrour is the effect or consequent of it. The word here used for Terrour, [...] notes the most terrible terrour or affrightment. Terrour is the extreame of feare, or feare confused, into amazement and asto­nishment: Death is therefore called the King of terrours, because there are so many powerfull terrours in death, Psal. 55. 4. That vexation which Saul felt, when God sent out an evill spirit with commishion to vex him, is exprest by this word, 1 Sam. 16. 14. An evill spirit from the Lord, troubled, or terrified him; Such terrors, for the matter, such for the manner and present workings of them, seized upon upright-hearted Job, and false-hearted Saul. A beleever, a child of God, an heire of Heaven, may feele himself haunted and pierced with hellish terrours.

These are called the Terrours of God, eyther first, by a common Hebraisme; because great, and strange terrours. In that language, God is often put as an Epithite, to shew exceeding greatnesse, him­selfe being the greatest. So Chap. 1. ver. 16. Fire of God, &c. Secondly, Terrours of God, because he sent and commanded that Army of Terrours. When Jacob journeyed with his little Army, Gen. 35. 5. It is said, The terrour of God was upon the Cities round about, and they pursued them not; that is, the Lord sent an Army of terrours to oppose the Cities, least they should arme a­gainst Jacob. The terrour of man is very terrible, and therefore the Apostle armes the Saints against it, 1 Pet. 3. 14. Be not afraid of their terror. The terror of God is infinitely greater; and there­upon the Apostle argues, 2 Cor. 5. 11. Knowing therefore the ter­rour of the Lord, we perswade.

Those terrours of God, may be taken two wayes: Either active­ly, or passively: Actively, for that work of God, in terrifying and [Page 431] troubling. Thy terrours, that is, the terrours which thou didst afflict me with; Or passively; for those afflictions which oppresse Nomen terro­ris fr [...]quenter, in Scripturis sumitur, pro flagellis malis (que) gravissimis a Deo missis. the mind; when God leads that army against us, sets it in array to charge, and commands it to encampe about us, in either sence we may take this of Job, as also that of Heman, Psal. 88. 15. While I suffer thy terrours, I am distracted.

Further, There is a two-fold terrour: First, caused by outward imminent danger. Secondly, caused by inward guilt. Or, Ter­rour comming from the wrath of man; and terrour coming from the wrath of God. Thus it was threatned, Levit. 26. 16. I also will doe even this unto you, I will appoint over you terrours. Deut. 32. 25. The sword without and terrour within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin. That is, feare shall kill those who escape the sword. A people cannot stand before the Army of men, who are once surprised with an Army of terrours: Hence Josh. 2. 9. Your terrour is fallen upon us, saith Rahab to assure the spies, that the Canaanites could not stand before the people of Israel.

Againe, The terrours of God afflict the soule; First, When sin is set openly (to the eye of conscience) in array against us. An army of sins, are an army of terrours. The Church is cal­led, Terrible as an army with banners; Cant. 6. 10. when she is strengthned and armed for the exercise of all that power, which Christ hath given her; and when our sins stand before us, in all that strength, which the law hath given them, they also are terrible as an army with banners.

Secondly, When God hides his face from us, an army of ter­rours quickly faces us; Though an army of sins come out in array against us, yet if God appear to us, in the fulnesse and freenesse of his grace; if Christ our Captaine will but leade us on against this army, we shall quickly overcome them, or they will will fly before us; But an army of sins is exceeding terrible, when Christ appears not in the field for us, or when God hides his face from us, and leaves us in the dark: It is usuall in Scripture, to set forth terrours, as the effect of that darknesse, and the hidings of the face of God; Naturally, terrour accompanies dark­nesse; children are afraid in the dark; and not onely children, but men: Histories tell us of great Emperours who durst not be in the dark, for fear. And as naturall terrours meet us in naturall dark­nesse, so spirituall terrours in spirituall darknesse; When the light [Page 432] of Gods countenance is clouded, and (as it were) benights the soule. then terrour takes hold upon us. Under either of these no­tions, we may understand the terrours of this text, The terrours of God doe set themselves in array against me. It was true in re­spect of outward troubles, they were very terrible: But especial­ly in regard of inward troubles; when God set his sins in array be­fore him, or hid his face, and obstructed the course of his wonted communion.

Set themselves in aray against me.

The Originall imports, a very exact, curious, artificiall ordina­tion [...] Ordinavit, ra­tione & pro­portione, dispo­suit, instruxit. and disposall of things; As if the Lord had even studied to be exact and exquisite in afflicting Job; he puts his sorrowes into a method, and his troubles into order. The providence of God ob­serves a rule, and is harmonious in those things which appeare to us, a chaos, a heape of confusion. The word is applied;

First, To the ordering of speech, or disputations; There is a kind of embattailing in disputation, when it is regular and artifi­ciall (Job 32. 14) Now he hath not directed his speech against me, saith Elihu concerning Job; as if he had said, Job hath not marsh­alled his arguments against me, but all the charge hath been upon you.

Secondly, I find the word used in reference unto prayer: Prayer ought to be full of holy order and composednesse (Psal. 5. 3.) In the morning will I direct my prayer to Thee, and looke up. In the morning will I put my prayer in array, I will posture my pray­er in a gratious order, my heart in order, and my words in order, every petition shall (as it were) keep ranke and file, when I am see­king unto God: Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thy heart be hasty, to utter any thing before God, is the counsell of the Holy Ghost by Solomon, Eccles. 5. 2.

But, properly, the word is applied to the marshalling and im­battailing of an Army (Jer. 50. 9) Loe, I will raise, and cause to come up against B [...]bylon, an assembly of great nations from the North countrey, and they shall set themselves in array against her, &c.

So then, whereas Job saith, The terrours of God are set in array against me, he would intimate, that God afflicted him, both order­ly and resolvedly. It was not some confused terrour, or sudden sur­pti [...]al, but the Lord God, like some great Commander or General, [Page 433] mustered and marshal'd his army, and led it up exactly form'd, to a pitcht battell against him. Observe from hence, first,

Afflictions come sometimes by multitudes.

You shall have a whole Army of them together; Sometimes we see a duell or single combate, one man matcht with one trouble; Bellum at (que) virum. Here a man and an affliction; there a man and an affliction; but another time we may see a man and an army (as he spake in the sto­ry, when one made good a passe against a whole host of the enemy) in the spirituall war, one soul grapples with a multitude of troubls, and conflicts▪ with a thousand temptations: As there are legions of evill spirits, so legions of spirituall evils assaulting at once. Se­condly Observe,

God sometimes appeares as an enemy to his own servants.

The terrours of God, and the arrowes of God (saith Job) God shootes the arrowes, and sets the terrours in array. Job expected favour and succor from God, but he finds terrours and arrowes: Those wounds make our hearts bleed most, which we appre­hend given us from his anger, whom we have chosen as our only friend. The Church had that apprehension of God (Lam. 3. 3.) Surely against me is he turned, he turneth his hand against me all the day. The Church speakes, as if God were quite changed, as if he having been her friend, were now turn'd enemy. So Job; I that was wont to have showers of sweet mercies, shot and dar­ted into my soule, now feele deadly arrowes there, shot from the same hand; my spirit was wont to drinke in the pleasant influen­ces of Heaven; but now poison drinks up my spirits. I was wont to walk safe, under the guard of divine favours, but now divine ter­rours assault me on every side. Thirdly observe:

When God appeareth an enemy, man is not able to hold out any longer.

See, how Job (poor soul) cries out as soon as he found, that these were Gods arrowes, and Gods terrours. Job was a man at armes, a man of valour, and of an undaunted courage; A man that had been in many ski [...] mishes with Satan, and had often, through the power of God, foiled him, and come off with victory. Chaldeans and Sabeans, were (indeed) too hard for his servants, and con­quer'd his cattell, yet the spirit of Job beate those bands of rob­bers, and triumphed over them; but, he was never in battell with God before, and perceiving now God himselfe to appeare as an enemy in the field, he cries out, O the terrours of God, O the [Page 434] arrowes of the Almighty. When God is angry, no man can abide it. (2 Cor. 5. 11.) Knowing the terrour of the Lord, we perswade men: We (saith the Apostle) who have felt by experience, or by faith have understood the terrour of the Lord: we knowing it experimentally, or knowing it beleevingly; we, being fully perswaded that the terrour of the Lord is most terrible, per­swade men; O take heed you put not your selves under the ter­rour of the Lord, or provoke the terrour of the Lord against your selves. Those terrours of the Lord which come from pure wrath, are altogether intollerable: And those which come from love, and are set in array by the infinite wisdome, and gratious providence of God, ordering all things for good (to his) in the issue, even those are very dreadfull, no man, not the holiest of men (and they are the strongest in this warre) are able to stand before them. Psal. 38. 2. Thine arrowes stick fast in me, and thy hand presseth me sore, there is no soundnesse in my flesh by reason of thine anger: that is, I am as a man, who hath not a whole peece of skin all his body over, all is a wound: or I am as one, whose flesh is all rotten by reason of his wounds. As Ely speakes to his sonnes, 1 Sam. 2. 25. If one man sin against another, the Judge shall judge him, but if a man sin against the Lord, who shall in­treate for him? So, we may say on the other side, if man contend with man, some one may helpe him, he may have a Second to re­leeve him; but if once a man be contending with God, who will be his Second? who will undertake for him? who can come in, to the rescue; when God is fighting and contending with us? We wrastle not against flesh and blood, (saith the Apostle, Ephes. 6. 12. when he would shew, what a terrible thing it is to wrastle with the Devill) but against principalities and powers, against spi­rituall wickednesses in high places. Flesh and blood is no match for a spirit, though a created spirit, though an uncleane spirit, a De­vill: how then shall flesh and blood be able to wrastle with the creating Spirit, with him, who is a most holy Spirit, with God, who is The Principality, The Power, The High, the Srong, The Almigh­ty Shaddai. In other battels it is man with man, or at worst, man with Devils; but here it is man with God, weaknesse and frailty, contending with omnipotency: and therefore when once God appeares against the soul, the soul can hold out no longer, His an­ger, who is The Spirit, quickly drinks up our spiirts. Fourthly ob­serve.

Inward wounds and terrrours are most terrible.

Doe not think that the soares upon Jobs body, fetcht all these complaint from him. He shewes you now, what it was that made him complaine indeed, The arrows of the Almighty are within Tanto poena in­tolerabilior, quan [...]o spiritus corpore subti­lior. me, the terrours of God set themselves in array against me. As the joyes and exultations of the spirit doe infinitely exceed all the pleasures which come in from the senses, all bodily pleasures: so the troubles and afflictions which are upon the spirit, infinitly exceed all the troubles and afflictions which fall upon the body. As God hath such comforts, such joyes to bestow upon his people, as the world can neither give nor take away; so likewise, he hath ter­rours and troubles, which all the world is not able to remove or mitigate: There are no medicines in the whole circuite of nature, that can heale a wounded spirit; All your friends, all your relations, all your riches, yea all your naturall wisdome, will be but as the white of an egge to your tast, in the day when God smites the heart with these terrours.

These arrowes and terrours are often preparatorie to con­version; when some men are overcome to receive Christ, an Army of terrours is sent out, to take them captive, and bring them in. There are many (I grant) whom God wounds with love, he shootes an arrow of favour into their hearts, and overcomes them with Troopes of mercies. Againe, An army of terrours, is sent out to try the holy courage of those, who are converted, as well as to conquer the unholy enmity of person: unconverted. That was Jobs case here; and these second armies may be as terrible to the soule as the first, and often are more terrible. And (we have such cases) a man that was converted without an army of terrours, may have an army of terrour, sent against him after conversion. The dispensations and methods of God are various, though both his rule and end be ever the same; But whether this army of ter­rour comes before conversion, or after conversion; whensoever it comes, it must needs distresse the soule exceedingly. A broken spirit is very comfortable, but a wounded spirit is very dreadfull: Of a wounded spirit we may say, as I remember the Moralist speakes, concerning those barbarous naked fights, among the Ro­mans, when men fought naked with men; or naked with beasts; Surely (saith he) all the former fights and battels, were sports and Quicquid ante pugnotum est miserico [...]dia fuit, Sen. mercy to these: So all other troubles, all other terrours, are pleasures and recreations to these; When you come to this bout, [Page 436] when God sends these arrowes and arrayeth such an army of ter­rours against you, fire and sword, stone and goute, are, yea, Hell it selfe (to present apprehension) is a pleasure. Many under those assaults have thought they should gain by the exchange, and have wished to be in Hell, so they might be out of those terrours.

Few beleeve this, but they who have had experience of it. As the joyes of the spirit, so the terrours of the spirit, are secrets unto most; As the Prophet speakes concerning those carnall ones in his time; If one prophesie unto them of wine and strong drinke, he shall even be the Prophet of this people. To prophesie, or to speake unto some of riches, and of honour, and of pleasure, they find some tast in these things, this is wine and strong drinke unto them. There is some rellish in these things, they understand what you meane; but if you speake unto them of joy in the holy Ghost, of peace of conscience, of the refreshings which are had in commu­nion with Christ; they understand not the language, they know not what is meant. So, on the other side, if you would be a Pro­phet, or speake, or preach to some of fire and sword, of spoiling and plundering their estates, preach to them of plague and pesti­lence, preach to them of the gout, and of the stone, of burning fea­vers, and languishing consumptions; they understand these and are afraid, they even tremble to heare you speake of these things: but preach to them of the arrowes of the Almighty, shot into the spi­rit, of the terrours of God set in array against them; preach to them of trouble of conscience, and the hiding of Gods face, they smile at these things, they wonder what you would have, they know no such matters. Spirituall good or evill, is seldome knowne till felt, yea neither of them is knowne (to purpose) till it is felt: Spirituall troubles are as little knowne, till felt, as spirituall joyes are: The naturall man perceives none of the things of God, he cannot know them, because they are spiritually discerned: And there is as much spiritualnesse evidenced in discerning spirituall sorrowes and afflictions (our own or others) as there is in discer­ning our own or others spirituall joyes and consolations.

I shall adde a word here to those, who live securely, in, or dally with, their sins; Surely, if Job here in the text; if David often in the Psalmes, and Heman (Psal. 88. 15.) cryeth out, While I suffer thy terrours I am distracted; If these cried out thus of the terrours and arrowes of God, then, (I say) Sinners and Secure ones, what will you doe, when God bends his bow, and opens [Page 437] his quiver, and shoots his arrowes at your naked breasts? What will you do, when God shall bring up armies of terrours to charge upon you? When you heare a Job thus crying out of terrours? How sad will it be to you, who will be a terrour to your selves, M [...]gor missa­b [...]b. as Pashur was threatned, Jer. 20. 4. and God a terrour to you likewise? What will you doe, when there is a feare round about, and feare within? The sinners of Zion are afraid, fearfullnesse hath surprized the Hypocrites; who among us shall dwell with the de­vouring fire? Who amongst us shall dwell with everlasting bur­nings? Isa. 33. 14. If they who have a shield of faith to keep off these arrowes, and a rock of salvation, Jesus Christ, to hide them­selves in, when these armies come to battell against them, are thus afraid; what will become of you, that are unarmed, of you, naked ones, of you, who have no shield, no shelter, no faith, no Christ?

One thing more. Forasmuch, as there are such arrowes and ter­rours sent by God, even against his owne, for their triall; Take heed of making arrowes against your selves; Take heed you be not found to raise and prepa [...]e an army of terrours, against your own souls. All the while men sin, knowingly and presumptuously, they shoot arrowes against God, and God may take those arrowes and shoot them back into their breasts, he can make their sins recoyle upon themselves, and pierce their own hearts with the workes of their owne hands. Men muster (as it were▪) whole armies of terrours, and levie a bloody war against themselves by wilfull sin­nings. That text, Psal. 50. 21. telleth us, that God will bring Significat qua­si distinctio or­dine bellico▪ ap­paratu catalo­gum omnium scelerum pro­ponere. the sins of wicked men, as an army against them, I will reprove thee, and set thy sinnes in order before thine eyes: It is the same Hebrew word, we have in the text, I will set thy sinnes in aray be­fore thine eyes; as if he should say, thou thoughtest all thy sinnes were scattered and disperst, that, there was not a sin to be found, that they should never be rallyed and brought together; but I as­sure thee, I will make an army of those sins, a compleate army of them, I will set them in rank and file, before thine eyes, and see how thou canst behold, much lesse contend with such a host as they. Take heed therefore you doe not levy warre against your owne soules; that's the worst of all civill or intestine wars. If an army of divine terrours be so fearfull, what will an army of blacke, hellish sins be? When God shall bring whole Regiments of sins against you, here a Regiment of oaths, there a Regiment [Page 438] of lies, there a third of false dealings, here a Troope of filthy a­ctions, and here a Legion of uncleane, or prophane thoughts, all at once fighting against thy life, and everlasting peace.

Lastly, you that have never felt these arrowes, nor seene any of these armies, and yet God hath been pleased to discover to you his love in his Christ, see what cause you have to blesse God; Or, if you have at any time felt them, and are now againe at peace, and if those terrours are removed, and the poyson of those arrows suc­ked out, and the heads of the arrows drawn out; blesse God. Doe you not heare how Job complaines of arrows and of terrours? The arrowes of the Almighty are within me, the poyson whereof drinketh up my spirit; the terrours of God doe set themselves in array against me.

Vers. 5. Doth the wild Asse bray, when he hath grasse? Or low­eth the Oxe over his fodder? &c.

The three verses following containe similitudes, taken from na­ture, by which Job tells on the story of his sorrows, and justifies his complaint. The sense in Generall is this, as if he had said, I doe not cry out without cause; I should be more unreasonable then bruit beasts in so doing, The wild Asse doth not bray, when he hath grasse, &c. Or thus, We blame not beasts, if they complaine, when they have cause: take away grasse from the Asse, and fod­der from the Oxe; Pinch them with hunger, and they will tell you of it, in their language; they will low and bray, till you understand they want meat; Therefore surely you have no reason thus to find fault with me, or to charge me so heavily, because I have complained, when my grasse and fodder, my comforts and my necessaries are taken from me: Nor is it any wonder, if you complain not, who have contentments to the full, and know not (by experience) what sorrow meaneth.

Doth the wilde Asse bray, when he hath grasse?

The [...] Fera, onager à [...] Fructisicavit, fructum fecit, quod ferae Do­mesticis ani­mā [...]ibus sint foe­cūdio res. Shin. Hebrew word for a wild Asse, comes from a root, signify­ing, To bring forth: and the reason is given, because wild beasts usually are more fruitfull, and bring forth more plentifully than the tame. The word also notes wild in generall; and is applied to wild and savage men, who delight in wild beasts, or wild pla­ces forrests and wildernesses. So (Gen. 16. 12.) God speakes of Ishmael, whom Hagar bare unto Abraham, that he should be [Page 439] A wild man, that is, wild among men; or as a wilde asse a­mong [...] Onager inter homines subau­dito [...] erit in­ter homines si­cut Onager, ro­bore praevalens. men, strong and active, delighting in fields and for­rests.

Doth the wild Asse (saith Job) bray, when he hath grasse? When the asse hath meat he is quiet; You heare not of him: but if he want g [...]affe, he brayes and makes a dismall noise (Jer. 14. 6.) The wild asses did stand in the high places, they snuffed up the wind like dragons, their eyes did faile, because there was no grasse, speaking of a time of drought and famine; The wild asse is very impatient, both of hunger and of thirst. And therefore the rivers are (by name) assigned to them for drinke, Psal. 104. 10, 11. He sendeth the springs into the valleyes, which runne among the hils; they give drinke to every beast of the field; the wild As­ses quench their thirst. Hence wilde asses are observed by naturall Historians to delight in, and frequent rivers and springs.

To which that prophane fiction of the Roman Historian (in abuse Cornelius Taci­tus, l. 21. of the Jews) hath relation; who speaking of the travels of the Is­raelites, through the wildernesse, tels us (to obscure the miracle. which God wrought for them) that they being ready to die with thirst, at last espied a company of wild asses upon a rocke: which advantage Moses tooke, and presently followed them, knowing that they would lead him to the waters, if any were to be had in those parts. In pursuance of which lie, Plutarch affirmes, that the Jewes worshipped an asse, as a Deity, which they had in speci­all Plutarch. l 4. Convivalium Questionum. quest. 5. honour and veneration, for that famous deliverance. Upon this stocke of lies, the Heathen grafted that usuall scorne against the Christians, That they worshipped the head of an asse. As that great Assertour of the Christian. honour against Heathenish ca­vils and hellish imputations hath observed. Tertul. advers. Gentes cap. 16.

But, that is a harmelesse and a witty observation (how solid I leave the Reader to judge) which hath been hinted from this na­turall thirstiness of the wild asse: namely, that the Lord gave Samp­son water out of the jaw-bone of an asse, Judg. 15. 19. thereby advancing the miracle, that a dead bone of that thirsty creature should be made a spring of water to revive him, who was ready to die with thirst.

The intendment of this digression, is only to cleare up the text, by shewing that the wild asse is most fitly instanc'd in, to shew the great cause which Job had to cry out, as he did of his afflictions; [Page 440] forasmuch as the wild asse (who is so greedy [...] grasse and thirsty after the waters) will not bray for either till he is afflicted with the want.

Or loweth the Oxe over his fodder?

This carries the same meaning with the former instance; that being in wild creatures, and this in tame: as if Job had said, looke amongst all sort of cattell, wild or tame, you shall find they are content, when they have food convenient for them. And here­upon grounds his argument, that if bruits led only by sence and appetite complaine not without reason, then surely he, at least a reasonable creature, had reason to complaine, or else he had not complained. Hence, Observe;

First, Bruit beasts complain not without cause.

They complaine not till want provokes them. Surely, men are more then brutish, who complaine when they have no want: But most of all, They, who are not content with aboundance. Some are discontent, not only, though they have daily bread, and (as the Apostle speakes) Food and raiment (wherewith all should be content) but though they have store of bread and cloa­thing laid up for many years. Shal not the ox or asse condemn these, who bray and low, when they have grasse and fodder plenty, when they stand continually at racke and manger. By whom shall these men be accused think you? We shall not need to send for the An­gels out of heaven, to witnesse against them; No, we may call the wild beasts, and bid them be witnesse: we may empannel, A Jury of asses and oxen to passe a verdict upon such men. As God up­braides his people in case of their ingratiude for mercies, The Oxe knowes his owner, and the Asse his Masters crib; and (Jer. 8. 7.) in case of their neglect of judgements. The Storke in the hea­vens knoweth her appointed times, and the crane; and the turtle, and the swallow observe the time of their comming, but my peo­ple doth not know the judgement of the Lord. As if the Lord had said, whither shall I goe to fetch witnesse against this people; shall I goe up to heaven for Angels, or call in men out of other Nations? No I need go but to the aire for birds, for the turtle, the crane and the swallow; any thing in nature will serve to condemne them, who act against, or below the dictates of Nature. Men are worse then beasts, when they doe worse. Their prehemi­nence of constitution is lost in the basenesse of their actions: and [Page 441] they put themselves by so much inferiour to beasts, by how much they were placed above them. The Psalmist charges it sadly upon himselfe, that he walked in the spheare of a beast, So foolish was I and ignorant, I was a beast before thee (Psal. 73. 22) How sadly then shall they be charged, who walke in a spheare below beasts, who are more foolish and ignorant then a beast. Take heed of complaining without cause; if beasts are satisfied with what is agreeable to nature, man should be so much more, When Nature hath not enough, Grace hath all. Grace will not bray or low, when there is no grasse, no fodder: surely then they have a scarcity of grace in their hearts, who bray and low over their grass and fodder. Spirituall accommodations will make a good heart forget temporall incommodities; and it is reason they should God promiseth (Isa. 30. 20.) Though I give you the bread of ad­versity and the water of affliction, yet thy teachers shall no more be removed into a corner, but thine eyes shall see thy teachers. As if he had said, though your bodies are coursely fed, yet your souls shall be feasted; Good cheare shal daily be served into them, both at your eyes and eares, Thine eyes shall see thy teachers and thou shalt heare a voice behind thee. Thy sight and thy hearing shall be refreshed with heavenly Messengers and good news from heaven Now besides this promise exprest, there is a duty implyed in the text, namely, that because their spirits were so well fed, therfore they must not complain, though their flesh come short in feeding. The bread of affliction should be pleasant to us, while we eate Gospel­dainties. In these times God gives more plenty of spirituall food than formerly, yet many complaine, because their naturall bread is shortned; Remember beasts complaine not, when they have what is suitable to nature, then let not Christians complaine, when they have what is suitable to grace, though nature have but spare diet, and short commons.

Vers 6. Can that which is unsavory be eaten without salt.

He proceeds to another similitude. It is, as if Job had said, Na­ture will complaine, when it wants meat, yea oftentimes nature will complaine, when it wants pleasant meat. Nature is not plea­sed, if it want a graine of salt, if it have not sauce, it is not sa­tisfied. Therefore, surely I am to be borne with, and not to be charged thus deeply, who complaine; when you offer me that which is unsavoury, when you give me meat without salt, with­out [Page 442] sauce, without any thing to render it, either pleasing to my [...] Est quod debito condimento & tempera­mento caret, sive in defectu, sive in excessu. Sales, pro facetijs, quod sint quasi condimen­tum, sermonis Literae Sparsae sale humanita­tis. Gicer, ad Artic. [...] b Est prepositio abs (que) fine. Sed quidam accipi­unt pro nomine composito ex Min, quod est, ex & beli, à Balab, quod est, ve [...]st [...]s. H [...]nc locam reddunt; Infaluatum ex vetustate salis, potius quam in­sipidum abs (que) salae. Bold. Job rem prae horrore prorsus impossibiliem vult significare; Numquid co­modetur? &c. At impossibile omnino non est comedere insip­idū sine sale, carnes autem corruptae ex ve­tustate salisman­ducars nulla tenus pos­sunt. Bold. pallate, or easie to my digestion: Unlesse I were sencelesse like a stock or a stone, how should I not disrelish and disgust saplesse, saltlesse, how much more, bitter things.

Can that which is unsavorie.

The word, which we render unsavorie, is the same used, Chap. 1. ver. 22. which wee there opened at large; Job did not charge God with folly or foolishly, or he spake not unsavorily of God.

There is a threefold application of that word in Scripture.

1. To unpleasant meats.

2. To untempered morter.

3. To indiscreet speeches, which want the seasoning either of wit, wisdome, or of truth, Lam. 2. 14. Thy Prophets have seene vaine and foolish things for thee; Lying visions without truth, vain words without wisdome. So here, Can that which is unsavourie be eaten without salt?

Seasoning makes unsavory things sweet; As salt gives a relish to meat, so wisdome and wit to words. And therefore the Latines ex­presse wise, witty speeches, pleasant discourse, a good grace in speaking, and a salt, by the same word.

There is another Interpretation of that word, which we render b without: for some understand it, not as a Preposition, governing the word Salt, but as a compound word, noting the oldnesse or stalenesse of meat, wherein the very salt it selfe is putrified; and so whereas we say, Can that which is unsavoury be eaten with­out salt? They translate thus, Can that which is unsavoury through the corruption of salt be eaten? Or, can that meat be ea­ten, which having been salted, is now putrified? Salt which keeps meat from corruption, may in time be overcome with the corrup­tion of the meat. And a learned Interpreter gives the reason why he rather chuseth this interpretation of the word, because (saith he) it carries a stronger Emphasis with it; Job speakes as of a thing (in a manner) unpossible to be done; Now it is very pos­sible to eat unsavoury meat, without salt? A good appetite will downe with unpleasant food, and hunger will dispence much with Cookery. But when season'd or salted meat corrupts and putri­fies, whose stomach doth not loath and abhorre it? Therefore it is a fuller, and a more flat deniall to say, Can that which is unsavoury [Page 443] thorough the corruption of salt, be eaten then? Then to say, Can that which is unsavory be eaten without salt?

Or is there any taste in the white of an Egge?

These words are much obscured, by most Translators, and have [...] found almost as many expositions, as Expositours. Some translate thus, Is there any taste in that, which being taken brings death? So the Vulgar; Doubtlesse a man hath but little pleasure to taste An potest ali­quis gustare quod gustatum affert mortem. Vulg. that, which tasted, will be his death: So the words are an aggra­vation of the unsavourinesse of those things, which were offered him by his friends; to touch or take them, was to take poison, or to drinke in a deadly cup.

To cleare up this Exposition, they make the Hebrew word (Challamuth) which we translate, Egge, a compound, from Muth, signifying to die, whence Maueth, death; and Chala, signifying froth or fome, or from Chali, signifying infirmity: As if the word having these parts put together, had this sence, The froth and foame of death. Or, The infirmitie of death: That is, deadly froth, on deadly infirmity. As if he had said, is there any pleasing taste, in the spettle of dying men, who we know often fome and froth at their mouthes, when they lie drawing on.

Others thus, Is there any taste in the spettle of a healthy man. [...] Sanus, confor­tatus, convaluit▪ The word (Rir) which we translate white, signifies spettle or froth; As when David acted the mad-man before the King of Gath, it is said, that he let his spettle fall downe upon his beard, 1 Sam. 21. 13. And the word which we translate, Egge, signi­fies Health, and the verbe, to be healthy. Chap. 39. 4. of this booke, Their young ones are in good liking. So, Isa. 38. vers. 16. But I leave this, as a very diseased and sickly Interpre­tatiion.

I shall therefore passe from these, to our owne rendring, Is In albumine vi­telli. there any taste in the white of an Egge? The word signifies strict­ly, but the yolke of the Egge, so Mr Broughton, Is there any taste in the white of the yolke? And in the root to waxe fat or strong; and it is therefore taken for the yolke of the Egge, because that is the fatter, grosser, and more condense part of the Egge. As the white being the thinner, and much like spettle, is therefore exprest by a word, which also signifies spettle.

The white of an egge, is an embleame of things, without taste [Page 444] or savour. And so the summe of all is, that Job in this place by a Proverbiall speech (for so I take this to be) intends only thus much, that he had very infipid tastlesse things presented to him; such as he found to rellish at all in, such as no way raised his appe­tite or quickned his stomake to receive them, all were unseason'd and flat. In the next words he goes yet higher, even to the high­est Antipathy against them.

Vers. 7. The things which my soule refused to touch, are as my sor­rowfull meat.

Here is the application and explication of both the former simi­litudes. The things which my soule refused; that is, the things Anima. [...], partem, scilicet animae qua concupiscimus no [...]at hoc loco. which I exceedingly refused or abhominated, (The soule is here taken for the appetite) As to desire with the soule, notes a strong intension of desire, (Isa. 26. 9.) With my soule have I desired thee in the night, yea with my spirit within me will I seeke thee early That is, I have most vehemently desired, and in my most retired▪ thoughts sought the Lord, When the soule is expressed to doe that which nothing can doe but the soule, it imports the highest actings of the soule in doing it. To desire with the soule, implies the sweetest delight, and so to refuse with the soule, implies the bit­terest aversation, a refusall to the uttermost. The word, re­fuse, is proper to the nauseating of the stomacke; at the sight of any filthy thing, (Isa. 30. 22.) Thou shalt defile the covering of the graven images, &c. Thou shalt cast them away as a menstruous cloth, thou shalt say unto them, get ye hence. So here, the things which my soule refuseth, as a man refuses a filthy clout, or, as he should refuse that which is most loathsome, then any filthy clout, an Image or an Idoll.

These things (saith he) are now my sorrowfull meate, or, the meate of my sorrow; The termes of the latter clause are at farthest distance from, and opposition with that which went before. Not to touch a thing, notes the greatest aversation from it; and to have a thing given us as meate, notes our greatest communion with it. That which a man will not touch with his finger, how farre is he from chewing it between his teeth, or letting it downe into his stomach, and digesting it into himselfe? So that Jobs meaning seemes to be this, that, what he desired to be the greatest stranger from, was now offered to his neerest familiarity and acquaintance. He was now (as it were) to eate, what before he would not touch, [Page 445] This we call sorrowfull meat. Psal. 127. 2. We reade of the bread of sorrow, that is bread gotten with sorrow, bread eaten with sorrow or course bread, As bread of pleasure (Dan. 10. 3.) is fine bread: here sorrowfull meat is either unpleasant meate, or any meate eaten in that time of his sorrow.

That relative (the Things) is not in the Hebrew, and so we may render word for word thus, my soule refused to touch them as my sorrowfull meate. Or as another, My mind refuses to touch them; these are plainly, the very sicknesse of my meate. As if he had said: I am so farre, from being refreshed with these that (the truth is) they make my very meate, and so my whole life unplea­sant to me.

Mr. Broughton varies the latter clause: Those things which I have loathed to touch, are now the very sicknesse of my flesh. The word (Lechem) which we translate meat, or prepared flesh, signifies also living flesh, in the Syriacke and Arabique langua­ges, as the learned Grammarians observe: Besides, we render the word (Lechem) flesh, Zeph. 1. 17. Their blood shall be powred out as dust, and their flesh as dung, Hence he translates, These things are to me as the sicknesse of my flesh; That is, the things which my soule refused to touch, are now brought very neere, and laid close upon me, as sicknesse or soares cleave unto, and are in the flesh, or they trouble me as much as the sicknesse of my flesh.

The right application of these words, is as difficult as the tran­slation of them; there are divers wayes to make out the sence; I shall reduce them unto two: Either, first, That all these unsavoury, tastlesse, sorrowfull meates; which Job speakes of, are but the sha­dowes of his afflictions and troubles, received from the hand of God. Or, Secondly, That they are shadowes of the counsels and reproofes, which he had received from the mouth of his friends. Nauseabam ego quondam ad hujusmodi ae­rumnas, move­bant mihi sto­machum, squ [...] ­lor, paupertas, vilior [...]cibus, ul­cerna, sanios, verss nunc vero his ipsie abundè pascor, Pined.

First, Some refer and apply all to the troubles, which were up­on Job: and so these words are a fuller justification of himselfe, that he had great cause to complaine, because his grasse and fod­der, that is comforts suitable to mans nature (as they to a beasts) were taken from him, and he was now fed and dieted with unsa­voury meate, meate without salt, the white of an egge, distastfull grievous afflictions, very gall and wormewood; The things which heretofore my soule refused to touch, are as my meate; I am put (as it were) to feed upon that, which I would not willingly come [Page 446] neere: poverty and soares, sorrowes and wormes are my compa­nions, and my cates.

From that sence note, What at one time we loath, at another time may be our diet. We have a saying, what is one mans meat, is another mans poison; but it may fall out to the same man, that what he disgusted and avoided as poison he shall be constrained to receive for his meat and portion. Lam. 4. 5. They that did feed delicately, are desolate in the streets, they that were brought up in scarlet, embrace dunghils: When those gallants were in scar­let, how did their soules loath to touch a dunghill? they loathed to touch it with their feet, but now they must hugge it in their armes, and lay it in their bosomes; they embrace dunghils. How many have been brought from faring deliciously, from wearing purple and fine linnen every day, to scraps and rags, to hunger and nakednesse every day. The Lord threatens the nice delicate dames of Jerusalem with such things, as their proud spirits and naughty soules refused to touch, Isa. 3. 24. It shall come to passe, that in­stead of sweet smell, there shall be a stinke; and instead of a girdle, a rent; and in stead of well set haire, baldnesse; and instead of a stomacher, a girding with sackcloath; and burning instead of beauty. Take heed of coynesse and curiosity: many a dainty tooth hath been taught by hunger, to knaw bones, and water for a crust of bread.

Observe secondly, That which makes afflictions most grie­vous to us, is the unsuitablenesse of our spirits to afflictions: De­light and content, consist in suitablenesse of the object to our affe­ctions and desires. God offers spirituall food to the naturall man, but his soule refuses to touch it; he loathes Angels food, and is weary of the manna of the word; The precious Gospel, the bread of life, is an affliction to him, because his heart is unsutable to it; how will such be afflicted at the last, when they find, That, as their sorrowfull meate for ever, which their souls will for ever refuse to touch. They, who loath Christ and his wayes, shall find nothing in the end to feed upon but what is most contrary to their appe­tite, even fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest, these shall be the portion of their cups, and the meate in their dish for ever. How sorrowfull will that meale be?

But we may rather apply all to the words of Eliphaz, in the two former Chapters: And Jobs ready submission in the first and second Chapters, to the afflicting hand of God, argues for him [Page 447] that afflictions, how grievous soever, were not the things which his soule refused to touch. And the apprehension of a learned inter­preter, atisfies me in it, This sense (saith he) is too low for a man Sensus humilior est, quam ho­minem deceat gravioribm malis exagtia­tum. Pined. [...]. afflicted with troubles, farre above these, which concern'd his out­ward man. The Septuagint are expressely for this opinion, who translate those words, Is there any tast in the white of an egge? thus Is there any tast in vain words? they are so farre off the judgement that these unsavoury things, the things which Jobs soule refused to touch, and the white of the egge, in the Text, are all meant of vain words, that they put it into the very text. It is a usuall boldnes with them, and a very unwarrantable one, to vary so from the words of the Originall, and make their glosse the text, but it shews us, how strongly they were engaged to that sence; Most of the Greek writers concurre with them in it, viz. that Joh aimes at the counsels and speeches of Eliphaz, which wanted the seasoning of wisedome and prudence, yea of truth and soundnesse, as applied to the spirit of so sick a man, as Job was.

And besides, many moderne writers are cleare in the same ap­prehension, giving the summe of all plainly to this effect, as the mind of Job in those fore going passages; I would not have com­plained of the things which ye have spoken, if they had been meate for me, but I assure you, your counsels are not nourishing: I can find no food, much lesse any sweetnesse or fatnesse in them; Your counsels want the due seasoning of wisdome, and the right tem­perament of holy zeale: They are either unsavory or tastlesse, Taneum abest ut sermonibus vestris recreet, aut corum con­dimento refici­atur vita mea, uté contrà [...]bum ipsum mihi amariorē vitam (que) inju­cundiorem red­d [...]t. Jun. Absit ut vir s [...]nctu ali­quando amico­rum suorum di­cta despexerit, qui & humilio servut fueris. Greg. saplesse stuffe; Such, as I am so farre from being refreshed with, that indeed they are a burden to me; and the remedy you prescribe me, is worse then my disease. How can you expect, that I should submit or subscribe to what you have spoken, or that I should rest and acquiesse in your reproofes or advices, seeing I assure you, they are not for me, they hit my state or spirit no more, then unsavoury meate doth my palate; or that which I abhorre to touch, can please my tast: And therefore, with my soule, I refuse and reject what you have spoken; And you have not only not satisfied me all this while, but you have vext or tired me, and instead of mitigating my sorrowes, have added to them.

But an objection arises against this; and one of the Ancients is very angry with those, who make this application to the counsels of Eliphaz, as if Job had rejected them, as unfit food, and unsa­voury meate. Let no man (saith he) think that this holy man despi­sed [Page 448] the counsell of his friend, who himselfe was humble, as a fer­vant.

To which I answer, That the counsels of Eliphaz, are to be considered, either in the doctrine, or in the use. His counsels, in the doctrine of them; were good and savoury, he spake wholesome food; but as to Jobs case, he was quite mistaken in their use: and so instead of easing, troubled him. A Physitian may give his sick patient; that which is good in it selfe, very cordiall and so­veraigne, and yet it may kill him instead of curing him, if it be not proper for his body, and his disease. Thus it is also in giving coun­sell what we speake, must be fitted to the person, and to the sea­son; There are many good counsels, of which we may say, as Hu­shai did of Achitophels, ill ones, 2 Sa. 17. 7. They are not good at this time. That which is good counsell to a man at one time, may be, or might have been, ill, to the same man at another, I have many things to say, saith Christ, but ye cannot beare them now, Joh. 16. 12. And that which one man can beare, another cannot at the same time. And therefore the Apostle was made all things to all men, 1 Cor. 9. 2. And accounted himselfe debtor, both to the wise, and to the foolish, to the learned and unlearned, to the weake, and to the strong; that is, he looked upon it as his duty, to speake truths, suiting the state of every degree and sort of men; which is the meaning of his rule to all the dispencers of holy mysteries, that they divide the word aright: The rightnesse respects, not only, or not so much the subject or word divided, as the object, or per­sons [...] Tim. 2. 15. to whom the division is to be made, in giving every one his portion, or foode convenient for him. One man may surfet with that which another digests kindly, what fattens a second, may sic­ken or starve a third. This plainly is the meaneing of Job; what Eliphaz had said, was not savoury foode for him, nor drest for one in his condition: His soule did even refuse to touch, what he spake, because his soule was not of that temper, for which Eliphaz had fitted his speech; He was a Physitian of no value to him, be­cause he brought a wrong potion, and mistooke his case; his was good searching physick for the foul stomach, and grosse spirit of a hypocrite: but it is enough to kill the heart of an upright-heart, when God seemes angry with him, and appeares against him, when he is smitten without. and smitten within, by sore afflictions of mind and body; then for his comforters to smite him with their tongues, to lay at him with hard words, and wound him with their [Page 449] unreasonable jealousies, then for his counsellers and helpers to be angry with, and opposite against him too. Observe hence;

That not only words untrue, but words misapplied, are unsa­voury, and may be dangerous. They are no food, and they may be poison. Prudence in applying, is the salt and seasoning of what is spoken. As a word spoken in the right season is precious, and up­on the wheele, so is a word right placed: When that faith full Prophet (Ezek. 13.) reproves the false prophets, he saith, They dawbed with untempered morter; ver. 10. it is the word of the text: and why was theirs untempered morter? even, because they applied the word of God wrong. They made sad the hearts of those, whom God would have refreshed, and they cheared the spi­rits of those, whom God would have sadned; they slay the souls that should not dye, and save the souls alive, that should not live; This was untempered morter: The Apostle advises all, Col. 4 6. Let your speech be alwayes with grace, seasoned with salt. And speech must be seasoned, not only with the falt of truth, but with the salt of wisdome and discretion: and therefore the Apostle adds, that ye may know how to answer every one; that is, that you may give every man an answer, fitting his case, and the present constitu­tion of his spirit. Of some have compassion (saith the Apostle Jude, ver. 22.) making a difference, and others save with feare. This shewes the holy skill of managing the word of God, when we make a difference of our patients, by our different medicines, and not serve all out of the same boxe. Hence our Lord calleth those great Teachers of the Gospel, and dispensers of his Oracles, Light, and Salt; You are the Light of the world, and you are the salt of the earth, because they were to speake savoury things to every person, to every pallate, as well, as to enlighten them with knowledge, and prevent or cure the corruption of their manners, and keep their lives sweet. As there is an unsavourinesse in persons, when they are mis-employed, so there is an unsavourinesse in speeches, when they are mis-applied. The history of the Church, speaks of one Eccebo­lius, who changed religion so often, and was so unsetled, that at last Conculcate me salem insipi­dum Niceph. he cast himselfe down at the congregation doore, and said, Tram­ple upon me, for I am unsavoury salt. And that word (though in it self a truth) which is unseasonably delivered, or unduly placed, may be cast at the doores of the Congregation, to be trampled on, for (in this sence) it is unsavoury salt; Such corrupt the word, and their's is, but corrupt communication, such as cannot minister [Page 450] grace unto the hearers, and often grieves the holy Spirit of God. These work-men, for their ill division of the word of God, have reason enough to be ashamed; and the Lord may justly reprove them, as he did Jobs friends, Chap. 42. 7. Ye have not spoken of me (nor of my wayes) the thing that is right.

JOB Chap. 6. Vers. 8, 9, 10, &c.

O that I might have my request! and that God would grant me the thing that I long for!

Even that it would please God to destroy me, that he would let loose his hand and cut me off.

Then should I yet have comfort, yea, I would harden my selfe in sor­row; Let him not spare, for I have not concealed the words of the holy One, &c.

IN the former part of this Chapter, we have had Job defending his former complaint of life, and his desire of death. In this con­text, from the 8th verse, unto the end of the 12th, he reneweth and reinforceth that desire. He not only maintaines and justifies what he had done, but doth it again; begging for death as heartily and importunately, as he did in the third Chapter, O that I might have my request! and that God would grant me the thing that I long for!

The request it selfe, is laid downe in the 8•h and 9•h verses: and the reasons strengthning it, in the 10, 11, and 12, verses. So, these 5 verses are reduceable to these two heads;

  • 1. The renewing of his desire to dye.
  • 2. An enlargement of reasons confirming that desire.
O that I might have my request!

It is such a vehement desire, and so exprest, as Davids was, 2 Sam. 23. 15. And David longed, and said, Oh that one would give me drinke of the water of the well of Bethlem, which is by the gate. David did not long more to tast a cup of that water, then Job did to tast the cup of death.

The summe and scope of Jobs thoughts in this passage, may be conceived thus. He would assure his friends, that his faith was firme, and his comforts flowing from it, very sweet; That, it was not impatience under the troubles of this life, but assurance of the [Page 451] comforts of the next; which caused him so often to call for death. That, these comforts caused his heart to triumph and glory in the very approaches of the most painfull death, and made him de­spise, and lightly to esteeme all the hopes of life. That, he was gone further then the motives which Eliphaz used, from the hopes of a restitution to temporall happinesse: he now was pitcht upon, and lodg'd in the thoughts of eternall happinesse. That, he call'd for death, not, as that, with which he had made any Covenant, or was come to any agreement with, but only, as that, which would bring him to his desired home, The one Thing he desired. That his comforts had not a foundation in a grave, where all things are forgotten, but in the Covenant of God, who remembers mercy for ever; and therefore, it should not trouble him, to die, be­fore he was restored to health, riches and honour (which his friends proposed to him, as a great argument of comfort, and of patience) For in death he should have riches and glory; and hence it was, that he had rather endure the extreamest paines of death, then stay to receive any outward comforts in this life. His desires to be dis­solved, were not so much, from the sence of his present paine (for he would harden himselfe to endure, yet more) as from the appre­hension of future joy; This, was not a fancie or a dreame, but he had good proof, and reall evidence of it in the whole course of his life which had been as a continued acting of the word of God, and to a fitting him for nearest communion with God. This in general.

The letter of the Hebrew runneth thus, Who would give me, that my request, or that my petition might come. He had sent up a request, a prayer, a prayer for death, and he thought his pray­er too long gone upon that message; Prayer was not quick enough in its returne from Heaven, every houre was a yeare till he heard of it, therefore (saith he) O that some body would give me, that my request might come back againe unto me! The word whereby [...] he expresses his request, notes a very strong desire, a strong cry, a strong prayer; implying, that Job had sent up mighty requests, or strong cries about it. As it is said of our Lord Christ, Heb. 5. That in the dayes of his flesh, he sent up strong cryes unto God, who was able to deliver him; Christ sent up strong cryes to be delivered from death, and Job sent up strong cryes for death. A word of the same root, signifies the grave; the grave is a craving, a beg­ging thing; the grave is never satisfied, as it is in the Proverbs, The grave saith not, it is enough: And the grave is therefore ex­prest [Page 452] by a word that signifies to desire, or request, or to ask a thing importunately; because, the grave, hath a mouth, as it were, con­tinually open to ask, and beg, and cry out for more morsells, it consumeth all, and is never full; such a desire Job put forth for death.

And that God would grant me the thing that I long for!

It is a repetition of the same desire, in other words. What it is to long, hath been opened in the third Chapter, ver. 21. Who long for death: Here Job reneweth the same suit againe, O that I might have the thing that I long for! or the thing which I expect with great expectation and vehemency of affection. I shall not stay up­on it: But only give you the generall sence a little varied.

In this passage, Job shewes himselfe assured, that his comforts should not end, though his life ended, before he was restored to earthly comforts. And he thus seemes to answer Eliphaz, who had made large promises of outward felicity. I am not stayed at all in Job expecta [...]io­nem proximam facit mortem tanquam eam, quae patiendi ultimam & quietis ac faeli [...]itatis primam representet li­ [...]. my desires to die, because I may possibly live in greater worldly honour and fullnesse, then ever I enjoyed: All that is in the creature, is be­low wy longing, I have not a sweet tooth after worldly dainties: I shall not envy any who cut-live me to enjoy them, let them divide my portion, whatsoever it may be, among them also: The thing which I long for, is death (not for it selfe) but as that, which will bring me to the last of my ill dayes, and the first of my best. Jobs thoughts were in a higher forme then his friends: They thought a gol­den offer of riches, would have made him a gogge to live. But Jobs heart lived above these, even upon the riches of eternall life; To enjoy which, he even longs for temporall destruction, and cutting off.

I have spoken at large in the third Chapter, concerning the law­fulnesse of such a request, and how farre Job might be approved in it; therefore I need not discusse it here; Only observe in gene­rall, That

A praying soule, is an expecting soule.

Job had prayed, and prayed earnestly, and though it was but a prayer to die, yet he lived in the expectation of an answer. When prayer is sent up unto God, then the soul looks for it's return. Pray­er is as seed sowne: After this spirituall husbandry, the soul waits for the precious fruits of Heaven. Psal. 62. 1. My soule waiteth upon God; and (Psal. 85. 8.) I will hearken what the Lord God [Page 453] will say; Job had sent up his request, and now he was hearkening for an answer. O that I might have the thing that I looke for! Habbakkuk in the second of that prophecie, verse 1. having pray­ed about the great concernments of those times, resolves, I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the Tower, and will watch to see, what he will say unto me. They who send Embassadours to forreigne Princes, waite for a returne. Thus it is with the soul, having put up it's request and sent an Embassie to God.

Observe, Secondly.

Answer of our prayer is the grant of God.

Nothing stands between us and our desires, but his will. If he signe our petition, no creature can hinder us of our expectation.

Observe, Thirdly,

God often keepes the petitions of his servants, by him unanswered.

Observe, Fourthly,

The returne of prayer is the souls solace and satisfaction.

As cold water to a thirsty soule, so is good news from that farre Country, Prov. 25. 25. O that my request might come; and O that I might have the thing that I long for!

Would you know what his request was? He explains that in the 9•h verse, and a man would wonder, that one should be so very earnest to have such a request. Many have prayed to God to save and deliver them, but how unnaturall doth this prayer seeme, to be cut off and destroyed? Yet the thing which Job doth more then pray for, long for, is this, That it would please God to destroy him. and that he would let loose his hand and cut him off.

That it would please God to destroy me.

Some reade, That he who hath begun, would make an end in de­stroying of me; For the word signifies both to be willing to doe a thing, and likewise to begin to doe a thing; therefore they [...] Significat li [...]e­re velle, inchoa­re; acquiescere in re quapiam, eam (que) tota vo­luntate ample­cti. make out the sense thus, That he who hath begun thus to destroy me, to teare and consume me, would finish his worke, and make an end of me; As if Job had said, I am already neare unto destru­ction, a borderer upon the grave. God hath begun to destroy me, I would have him to goe on and perfect that worke. As in workes of mercy, Deut. 32. 4. He is the Rocke, and his worke is perfect. When he beginnes to deliver, he will make an end. So like­wise, when he beginnes to destroy, he can make an end too; Job desires, that his afflictions might be perfected, to the destruction [Page 454] of his dying body, and that mercy might begin in the triumphs of his soule.

But rather take it in the other sense, as we render it, To be willing to doe a thing; Even that it would please God, or, even that God would be willing to destroy me! As if he had said, I find as it were a kind of unwillingnesse in God, to make an end of me, his bowels seeme to yerne over me, he seemes yet to be upon the dispute, whether to cut me quite off, or no: now I even desire that God would lay aside that his tendernesse and compassion, that he would determine and resolve to destroy me, that he would acquiesce, and fully rest satisfied in that reso­lution.

The word here used, to destroy, notes to beat a thing to pow­der, [...] Contudit, con­trivit, commi­nuit. or to beat a thing to pieces, Psal. 143. 3. He hath smitten my life downe to the ground, that is, He hath beaten me as it were to dirt: So Job here, I would have the Lord even beat me to dust or dirt. The word is used for contrition of spirit, Isa. 57. 15. I dwell with him that is of an humble heart, and of a contrite spi­rit: That is, with him, that hath a spirit beaten to powder, or all to pieces, as any hard thing is with a hammer or pestle; A hard heart, is a heart all in a lumpe, condensate and closed together; but an humble, a repenting heart, is a heart beaten small and ground to powder; Thus Job desires here, O that it would please God to beat my life downe to dust, and breake me all to shatters; that he would crush me (as Eliphaz spake in the 14th Chapter, ver. 19.) as a Moth.

Observe then in how sad a condition, Job was, who not onely makes, but renewes such a request, as this. Some upon a suddaine pang wish to die, and hastily call for death, yet are willing it should take it's own time, and come leisurely: and as soon as death appeares, they are crying, as hard for life. It is rare for any mans second thoughts, to keepe up, to such desires. Job spake once, and he speakes it over again; O that I might die, yea he wooes destru­ction, and is an importunate suiter for the grave. How sad is a mans outward condition, when he hath only this complaint left, that he cannot die? when a man hath no helpe, but in destruction, or hea­ling but in a deeper wound? Job in this appeares like a man (that is to be pressed to death) lying under a heavy weight, yet the weight not heavy enough to crush him to death, he cries out, more weight, more weight. It will be a kindnesse to crush out my [Page 455] breath and bowels; the greatest favour I expect in this world, is, but to have more weight laid upon them, that I may die. Some of the Martyrs, when the fire was scant, have cried out, more fire. The cruellest flame was their friend, and the more the fire raged the more merciful it was to them. The book of our Martyrs reports of reverend Latimer, that when he was giving witnesse to the truth, and glorifying the name of Christ in the fire; he cried out, Oh, I cannot burne, the fire came not fast enough upon him. Such this expression of Job seemes to be, Oh, I cannot die, I cannot be destroyed, I cannot perish yet; O that the hand of God would lay more weight upon me, that I might die. He seemes to aske such a curtesie, as that Amalekite▪ said, King Saul craved of him, 2 Sam. 1. 9. Stand I pray thee upon me, and slay me: for anguish is come upon me, because my life is yet whole in me. This is the favour, the only favour, that remaines for me. I am capable of no world­ly comfort, but a quicker dispatch out of the world.

And that he would let loose his hand, and cut me off.

Here is the same Petition, though other language, That he would [...] Loco movit, e­vulsit, excussit. let loose his hand. That's an elegant expression; The word signi­fies to loose the bond, that a man may have use of his hands or feet. As prisoners are loosed, Psal. 146. 2. The Lord looseth the prisoners: So that it is, as if Job had said, Lord thou hast been smiting and wounding me, but I see thou hast not given thy hand the full scope, thy hand is as it were bound or tied behind thee: As you know, a man that hath great advantage of another, or is much his over-mach, will say to him, I will fight with thee with Translatio ab his qui manum vinctam habent my hand tied behind me. The truth is, God is able to contend with all the creatures, with his hand bound behind him, with his hands fast bound, that is, without putting forth the least part (to speake on) of his power; He can overcome with speaking; Job observing here, that God contended with him (as it were) with his hands bound or tied up, desires now that, God would give him­selfe full scope, and put out his strength, and not strike, as if his hand were a prisoner. And he may have a respect in speaking thus to the Non se gera [...] erga me, instar hominis colliga­tam habentis manum. restraint or binding up of Satans power, In this worke Satan was Gods hand; God put power into the hand of Satan, All that he hath, is in thy power, or in thy hand, Chap. 1. 12. First, God loosened Satans hand, to take away his estate. Next, he let loose his hand a little further to the afflicting of his body; but saith [Page 456] God, spare his life, there he bound up his hand againe. Now Job alluding (probably) to that restraint: Lord (saith he) loosen thy hand a third time, doe not only loosen it, to take away my e­state, to take away my health and strength, but O that thou woul­dest loosen it, to take away my life too, enlarge I pray thee Satans Commission, who is thy hand, let it quite loose, that he may make an end of me, and cut me off.

The word here used to cut off, comes up to heighten Jobs sence [...] Inexplebilem cupiditatem at (que) immanem aviditatem vulnerandi, & humani sangui­nu perfundendi sign ficat. still, signifying to cut off, with an unsatiable appetite of revenge; As if he should say, Cut me off, spare me not, spare not my blood, doe it, as they, who are most greedy of blood, and thirst most ve­hemently after revenge. Let Satan, that blood-sucker, come with as great revenge (thy hand being loosened from restraining his) as ever the greatest Tyrant hastned with, to suck the blood of inno­cents; Let him greedily cut me off, even, as if he were to have some great gain, or get some rich booty by my blood; What profit is there in my blood? (saith David, Psal. 30. 9.) Let him make what profit he can of my blood, saith Job The word signifies to covet or de­sire gaine; And it notes the worst kind of covetousnesse, covetous­nesse of filthy lucre, or covetousnesse of bloodie lucre. Hence Job saith: Let God cut me off, as if he were to have profit, or raise Avidè me ab­sumat, quasi ex mea morte in­gens lucrum reportaturus, Pined. himselfe a revenew out of my blood; or let Satan come upon me, and take his penny-worths out of my blood, let him murder me, as if he were to find all manner of treasure in my bowels, and could thence fill and adorn all his chambers of darknes with spoils. We may note from hence;

First, That God dispenceth and acteth his power as he pleaseth. He looseth his hand gradually, as to him seemeth good.

First, To the estate, then to the body, and when he wills, he can reach the life. Secondly observe;

If God put out his power, no creature can stand before it. If God doe but let loose his hand, man is cut off presently; It is but as a little twigge, or as grasse before the sith, or before a sword, there is no more in it. As when God openeth the hand of his mer­cy; he satisfieth the desire of every living thing, Psal. 145. 2. So when God looseth the hand of his judgements, he takes away the life and comforts of every living thing. God hath a hand full of bles­sings and mercies; if he please but to open that hand, all things are filled with comfort: God hath another hand full of judgments and afflictions; if he open or loosen that, all creatures fall before [Page 457] him, like a withered leafe. The reason why the enemies of God live and are mighty, is because God doth not fully loosen his hand against them: if he would but unprison his power, and let out his hand, he can with ease destroy, and cut them off in a moment. Therefore the prophet prayes but for this one thing, Psalm. 74. 11. That God would pluck his hand out of his bosome; why with draw­est thou thy hand, even thy right hand? pluck it out of thy bosome: Lord (saith he) this is the reason, why enemies yet prevail, thy hand is tyed up, that is, Thine owe act hath tyed up thy hand, thy will stayes thy power, or thy power is hid in thy will. Gods power kept in by his will, is his hand in his bosome. Among men, a hand in the bosome, is the embleme of sloth, Prov, 19 24. Man hides his hand in his bosome, because he will not be at the paines to worke: God is said to hide his hand in his bosome, when it is not his will and pleasure to work: therefore he saith: Lord, if thou wouldest but let loose, and put out thy hand, all mine enemies shall be consumed. And that's the reason, why there are such vari­ous dispensations of providence in these times; when the enemy prevailes, God with draweth his hand, he keepeth his hand in his bosome. And when at any time his servants have victorie, it is, because his hand hath liberty. If God holds his hand, men stretch forth theirs in vain.

Observe; Thirdly,

Assurance of a better life will carry the soule with joy through the sorrows and bitterest pains of death.

It was not any Stoical apathy, or ignorant regardlessenesse of life which raised the heart of Job to these desires. He did not invite his end, like a Roman, or a philosopher, or by the height and gal­lantry of naturall courage, set the world at nought, and bid defiance to destruction. But he had laid up a good foundation against this day; upon this he builds his confidence. He knew, as Paul, that he had Christ, while he lived, and should have gaine when he dy­ed; The joy which was set before him made him over-look the crosse which was before him. So much of his request, now he tels us the consequence, or effect it would have upon him, in case it were granted.

Vers. 10. Then should I yet have comfort, yet I would harden my selfe in sorrow; Let him, not spare, for I have not con­cealed the words of the holy One,
[Page 458] Then should I yet have comfort.

If I had but this suit granted, I were refreshed, notwithstanding all my sorrows, the very hope of death would revive me. Nothing doth so much refresh the soule, as the hearing of a Prayer, and the grant of a desire; when desire cometh it is as a tree of life (saith Solomon) therefore Job might well say, when my longing comes, I shall have comfort; and lest any should think, that as David would not drinke the water he so longed for, when it was brought unto him: So when the cup of death should be brought to Job, he might put it off somewhat upon those termes which David did, and say, I will not drinke it, for it is my bloud, my death: therefore he adds,

Yea, I would harden my self in sorrow.

As if he had said, though some call hastily for death, and repent with as much haste, when death comes, yet not I, I would harden my selfe, &c.

The Hebrew (to harden) hath a three-fold signification among the Jewish writers, though it be used but this once onely in all the [...] Significat. 1. Solidare & ro­borare, 2. Ca­lefarere, urere. 3 Orare, suppli­citer praecari. Scripture. And hence there is a three-fold interpretation of these words, I would harden my selfe in sorrow, It signifies,

  • 1 To Pray or to beseech.
  • 2 To heat or to Warm, yea to scorch and to burn.
  • 3 To harden or to strengthen, strengthning is hardning in a me­taphor.

According to the first sense, the text is rendred thus, Then should I yet have comfort, yea, I would pray in my sorrow, that is, I would pray yet more, for an increase of my sorrow, that I might be cut off: If I had any hope, that my request should be granted, this hope would quicken my desire, and I would pray yet more, that I might obtain it.

Secondly, as the word signifies to warm or to heat, the sense is given thus, Then should I have comfort, yea I would warm my selfe in my sorrow: And so it refers it to those refreshings, which his languishing soul, his soul chilled, as it were, with sick­nesse and sorrows, should receive, upon the news of his approaching death. This newes (saith he) would be as warm cloaths to me, it Hac spe certis­sin â moriendi incalescerem, refocillarer. would fetch me again, out of my fainting, to heart of dying. But, besides a warming or a refreshing heat, the word also notes scorch­ing, [Page 459] burning heat. Mr. Broughton takes that signification of the word; I shall touch that, and his sence upon it, by and by.

We translate according to the third usage of the word. I would harden my self; and so the construction is very fair, I should yet have comfort, yea, I would harden my self in sorrow, that is, I would now set my selfe to endure the greatest sorrowes and afflicti­ons, which could come upon me, for the destroying and cutting off the threed of my life. And so, he seems in these words to pre­vent an objection before hinted; Why Job, dost thou desire to be cut off, and to be destroyed? thou hast more pain upon thee alrea­dy, then thou art able to bear; thou cryest out of what thou hast: thou must think, when death comes, thy wound will be deeper, and thy pain sharper? Iob seemes to answer, I have considered that before, I know there will be a hard brunt at parting, I prepare for it, and am thus resolved I would harden my self in sorrow; that is, I would set my selfe to bear the pangs and agonies of death; if I had but this hope, that my miserie were near expiring. The A­postle useth that phrase (2 Tim. 2. 3.) in his advices to young Ti­mothy. Thou as a good souldier of Jesus Christ, endure hardnesse, or bear evil. As if he had said, thou dost not know, what hard­ship thou shalt be put unto in thy ministry, I who am a veterane, [...] an old beaten (though never conquered) souldier, in this warfare of Christ, have been put to much hardship in my time; and from my owne experience, I advise thee, to inure thy selfe to hardship to lie hard, to fare hard, to work hard, to hear hard words, and receive hard usage, A tender spirit and a delicate body, which must have warme, and soft, and fine, and sweet continually, is unfit for the warfare of the Gospel. Such a sence is here, I know I must endure more, than now I doe, but I would harden my selfe a­gainst that time, and resolve to endure it, let come, what could come, I am resolved and have fore-thought the worst.

Further, for the clearing of these words, it is considerable, that some learned Interpreters put the two middle expressions into a parenthesis, and read the whole thus, I should have comfort (though I should scorch with paine, and though God should not spare me) for I have not concealed the words of the holy One. One, thus, This yet is my comfort, even while I scorch with pain Iunius. and God doth not spare me, that I have not concealed the words of the holy One. Mr. Broughton (as I touched before) comes near this sence and translation. So I should yet find comfort: though I [Page 458] [...] [Page 459] [...] [Page 460] parch in paine: when he would not spare; For I kept not close the words of the most Holy. That is, when the long expected houre of my death shall come, though God, to take away my life, should heat the fornace of my affliction seven times hotter then hitherto, so that I must parch in paine, yet I should have comfort. Or, take it in Master Broughtons owne glosse, in all these pangs; if God would make an end of me, it should be my comfort, and I would take courage in my sicknesse to beare it, by my joy, that I should die, because I professed the Religion of God. So that the strength of Job, to bear the hand of God, was from the conscience of his former integrity, in doing the will, and maintaining the truth of God.

Let him not spare.

Job having taken up his hope, that he should have comfort, [...] Pepercit cle­mentia usus fuerit. and this resolution, that he would harden himselfe in sorrow, speaks now, as if he were at a point, let God doe what he pleaseth, let him not spare; as if he had said, what course soever the Lord shall see good to take for the cutting me off, I am content he should goe on with it, Let him not spare. The word signifies to indulge or shew mercy to him, whom, by all right a man might justly destroy (Ezek. 5. 11.) Because thou hast done thus and thus, saith God therefore will I also diminish thee, neither shall mine eye spare, neither will I have any pity. Job seemes to invite, what God threatens others, Let him not spare, let him not have any pity, let him take his full swing in destroying of me.

In this sence it is said, Rom. 8. 32. That God spared not his own sonne: That is he abated not any thing, which justice could inflict. Christ therefore saves to the uttermost, because he suffered to the uttermost. He was not spared one blow, one drop, one sigh, one sorrow, one shame, one circumstance of all, or any one of these; which justice could demand, as a satisfaction for mans sinne. Yea though (in a sence) he cryed to his father, that he might be spared yet he was not.

There is a three-fold mercy in God. There is a preventing mer­cy, mercy that steps between us and trouble. And there is a de­livering mercy, mercy that takes us out of the hand of trouble: There is a third kinde of mercy, coming in the middle of these two, and that is called sparing mercy: and that is two-fold; First; sparing for the time, when God delaies and staies long ere he strike.

Secondly, sparing for the degree, when the Lord moderates and mitigates, abates and qualifies our sufferings, not letting them fall so heavie upon us, as they might: This sparing mercy, stands (I say) in the middle of the two former; it is not so much as preven­ting mercy, stopping trouble that it come not; neither is it so much as delivering mercy, removing it, when it is come. Now Job did not only, not aske delivering mercy, that he asked not sparing mer­cie; Let him not spare me in the time, let him not delay or loose time, let him come as soone as he will. And let him not spare me in the degree and measure, let him strike me as hard, and lay his hand as heavily upon me, as he will. David (Psal. 39. 13.) makes this his request, O spare me that I may recover strength, before I goe hence, and be no more; That is, abate and mitigate my suffe­rings that I die not, but Job desireth not to be spared at all. He rather saith, take away all my strength, that I may goe hence, and be seen no more. Observe hence,

That the hope troubles will end, comforteth, yea hardneth in bear­ing present troubles. Then will I comfort my selfe then will I harden my selfe, let him not spare, if I may have my request, and die. The sharpest sting of trouble, is, that it is endless, and it is next to that, when we can not looke to the end of it, nor see any issue or way out of it; That which discourages the damned, in bea­ring their sorrowes, and softens both their flesh and spirits, to re­ceive home to the head, every arrow of wrath, and dart of ven­geance, is, they see no end, and are assured there will be none. They know, they cannot be cut off, and therefore they cannot har­den themselves in sorrow; no, that very consideration, makes their hearts, which have been hardned to commit sin, tender to receive punishment, and exactly sencible of their pains; could they see, that at last they should be cut off, even they would be hardned to bear the torments of Hell, in the meane time, though that time should be very long, yea as long as time can be, onely not endlesse. The pain it selfe, doth not afflict so much, as the thought that they shall be afflicted for ever: As the assurance, that the glory of Hea­ven shall never end, infinitely sweetnes it; so the assurance that the paines of hell shall never end, infinitely sharpens them: And not to see the ending of worldly troubles neer, puts us further off from comfort, then the bearing of those troubles. Therefore saith Job, if I might be assured, that God would cut me off I would harden my selfe in sorrow, and let not God spare; I would not desire him [Page 462] to hold his hand, to mitigate or abate my paines. E [...] haec mihi merces esset e­jus seu pro eo, quod n [...]n occul­tavi unquam, sed diligentis [...] simè observavi & quam com­mendatissima habui verba Domini, Opin. Nonnullorum Hebraeorum apud Merc. Yea I would account every blow an embrace, and every wound a reward.

For not concealing the words of the holy One.

In these words, Job gives the reason, or an account of his renew­ed prayer and request to die. As the desire of Job was strong and passionate, so likewise it was well grounded. He had a very high reason, an excellent ground, upon which he bottom'd this request to die: His reason was spirituall, and therefore strong. He beggs to be delivered from the troubles of his life, though by a painfull death, because he was clear in himselfe, that he had led a blame­lesse life. That which set him above the paines of bodily death was the tranquillity of his spirit in this testmony of his conscience, I have not concealed the words of the holy One; As if he had said, You may wonder why I should be so forward and ready to die, why I seeme so greedy after the grave, why I am such an importunate suiter for my dissolution; The account I give you is this, I have the testimony of a good conscience within me, notwithstanding all the troubles which are upon me, notwithstanding all your harsh vn­friendly accusations, jealousies and suspitions of me, yet my own breast is my friend, my heart speakes me faire, and gives me good words, even these, It tells me, that I have not concealed the words Mirum est ut mihi non parcat quum illius verba non ce­larim neque dissimulaverim. Aben Azr. of the holy One: That I have not smothered any light he hath sent me, that I have not refused any councell he hath given me, that I have not wilfully departed from any rule he hath prescribed me, that I have been faithfull to God, to his cause, and to his truth, that I have declared his will, and spoken his minde to others; that I have not hidden any thing he hath given me in charge to declare, or committed to my trust; the word of God hath appeared in my life and therefore I am not afraid, yea I have boldnesse to die, and to appear before God.

I have not concealed] The word signifieth to hide a thing, so as [...] Significat, ab­scondere ne vi­dleatur vel au­deatur, ne am­plius appareat. it be neither heard of or seen.

But may not we conceal the words of the most high? it is said of Mary, that she hid the words of Christ in her heart and of David, that he hid the commandements of God in his heart, Psal. 119. 11. Did not the wise merchant hide the treasure, namely Gospel truth (Math. 13. 44.) as soon as he had found it? It should seem all these concealed the word of God; how then is it that Job improves this, as a speciall point of comfort, that he had not [Page 463] concealed the words of the holy One?

There is a double hiding, or concealement of the truth. There is first a hiding from danger; Secondly a hiding from use. There is a hiding to keep a thing safe, that others shall not take it from us; and there is a hiding to keep a thing close, that others may not take the benefit of it, with us. When it is said, that Mary, and Da­vid, and the wise Merchant hid the word of God, it was, lest they themselves should lose it, lest any should deprive them of it, they hid it from danger: They layed it up as a treasure in their hearts; but they did not hide it from the knowledge, or use of others; and that is it which Job affirmes of himselfe, I have not concealed the words of the holy One.

And there are four wayes by which the word of God is sinful­ly hid or concealed, from all which Job seemes to acquit himselfe.

The first is, when we conceal the word of God by our own si­lence; when we know the word and truth of God, and yet we draw a vaile over them, by not revealing them: The Apostle Paul (Acts 20. 27.) acquits himself in this, to the Church of Ephe­sus, I have not shunned to declare unto you the whole counsell of God; and verse. 20. You know how I kept back nothing, that was profitable unto you▪ Silence to what is spoken, is consent: and silence when we should speak, is concealement.

There is a second way of concealing the word of God, and that is by silencing others: Some conceale the words of the holy One themselves, and they cannot endure that others should publish them: The chiefe Priests and the Rulers (Acts 4 18.) charged Peter and John, that they should not speake at all, nor teach any more in the name of Jesus: They would stop the Apostles mouthes from speaking the words of the holy One: These keep the truth lockt up (as Christ charges the Lawyers, Luk. 11. 52.) by taking a­way the key of knowledge.

Thirdly, There is a concealing of the word of God, under false glosses and misinterpretations, or a hiding of it under errours and misconstructions; This is a very dangerous way of concealing the words of the holy One: The Pharisees made the law of God of none effect, by their expositions, as well as by their traditions, by the sence they made of it, as well as by the additions they made unto it.

Fourthly, The word of the holy One, may be concealed in our practise and conversations. The Apostle exhorts (Phil. 2. 16.) To hold forth the word of life in a pure conversation. The lives of [Page 464] Christians should publish the word of life. The best way of prea­ching the word, is by the praictse of the word. The wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteous­nesse of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousnesse, that is, who, by their unrighteous practises and ungodly conversations, imprison, fetter, restrain and keep in the word: Mans holy life is the loudest Proclamation of the word of God. And a sinfull life is the conceal­ment of it.

Job here acquits himselfe from all these concealements; I have not e [...]ncealed the words of the holy One, either by my own silence, or by imposing silence upon others, I have not concealed the word of the holy One, by my own corrupt glosses and interpretations, nor by a corrupt practise and conversation: I have desired and en­deavoured, that the whole word of God might be visible in my actions, and audible in my speeches, that I might walke cloathed, as it were, with the holy counsels and commandements of my God.

There is a reading of the words, different from this. Whereas we Malo potentia­liter exponi omnia: utinam, inquit, non par­ceret: Neque­nim occultarem dicta sancti, sed ejus in me sen­tentiam prae­dicarem & laudarem. Merc. say, I have not concealed the words of the holy One, that gives it thus, I would not conceale the words of the holy One, and so the word of the holy One, is taken, not for the truths of God in gene­rall, but for that special word of decree or sentence which God should passe out against him; A if he had said. Let not God spare me, let him write [...]s bitter a sentence against me, as he pleaseth, for my part, I would not conceale the, word of the most High, but I would publish his judgement and sentence against me, yea I would praise him and extoll him for it. The vulgar Latine to this sence, I would not contradict the word of the holy One; Let him not spare me, for as for my part, whatsoever God shall determine and resolve, whatsoever word God shall speake concerning me, I will never withstand or open my mouth against it. This is a truth, and carries in it a high frame of holinesse, when we can bring our hearts to this, that let God write as bitter things against us, as he pleaseth, we will never contradict his word or decree, but our minds and spirits shall submit wholly and fully to his dispositions of us, and dispensations towards us: It is as clear an evidence of grace, to be passive under, as to be active in, the word of God. Not to contradict his writ, for our sufferings, as not to conceale what he speaks for our practise. But I rather stick to the former interpretation, Job giving this as a reason of his great confidence [Page 465] in pursuing his petition for death, because he had been so sincere, holding forth the word of God both in doctrine and in life.

And so we may observe from it. First,

That the testimony of a good conscience, is the best ground of our willingnesse to die. That man speakes enough for his willingnesse to die, who hath lived speaking and doing the will of God; and he is in a very miserable case, who hath no other reason why he desireth death, but onely because he is in misery. This was one, but not the only reason, why Job desired death, he had a reason transcending this, I have not concealed the words of the holy One, and I know if, I have not concealed the word of God, God will not conceal his mercy and loving kindness from me. David bottoms his hopes of comfort in sad times, upon this, Psal. 40. 9, 10. I have preached righteousness in the great Congregation, I have not refrained my lips O Lord thou knowest (he was not actively or politickly silent) I have not hid thy righteousness within my heart (if lay there, but it was imprisoned or stifl'd there) I have declared thy faithfulness: and thy salvations I have not concealed thy loving kindness and thy truth, from the great Congregation. Upon this he fals a praying with a mighty spirit of beleeving, vers. 11. With­hold not thou thy tender mercies from me, O Lord, let thy loving-kind­ness and thy truth continually preserve me: for innumerable evils have compassed me about.

The remembrance of our active faithfulness to the truth of God, will bear up our hearts in hoping for the mercy of God. He that in Davids, and in Jobs sence can say, I have not concealed the words of the most high, may triumph over innumerable evils, and shall be more then a conquerer over the last and worst of temporal evils, death. God cannot long conceal his love from them, who have not concealed his truth.

Secondly observe, positively;

That the counsels of God, his truths, must be revealed.

God hath secrets which belong not to us, but then he puts them not forth in a word, nor writes them in his book; he keeps his se­crets close in the cabinet of his decrees and counsels; but, what he reveals either in his word, or by his works, man ought to reveal too. It is as dangerous, if not more, to conceal what God hath made known, as to be inquisitive to know what God hath con­cealed. Yea, it is as dangerous to hide the word of God, as it is to hide our own sins. And we equally give glory to God, by the pro­fession [Page 466] of the one, as by the confession of the other. Paul with much earnestnesse professes his integrity about this, as was even now toucht, Act. 20. Fourthly observe;

That the study of a godly man, is to make the word of God vi­sible. I have not concealed, that is, I have made plain, I have revealed, or I have published the words of the holy One; Much of Jobs mind is concealed under that word, I have not concealed. For in this negative there is an affirmative; as if he had said, this hath been my labour and my businesse, my work in the world, to make known so much of the will of God, as I know. This was the work of Christ here below, Father I have glorified thee upon earth, I have finished the work, which thou gavest me to do, Joh. 17. 4. What this work was, he shewes, vers. 6th, I have ma­nifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world. Lasty observe;

That it is a dangerous thing for any man to conceale the word of God, either in his opinion, or in his practice. For it is, as if Job had said if I had ever concealed the words of God, I had bin but in an ill case, at this time; God might now justly reveale his wrath against me, if I had concealed his word from others; or God might justly hide his mercies from me, if I had hid his word from men▪ Smo­thered truths, will one time or other set the conscience in a flame, and that which Jeremiah spake once, concerning his resolution to conceale the word of God, and the effect of it: will be a truth upon every one, who shall set himselfe under a resolution to doe, what he under a temptation did; Jer. 20. 9. Then I said, I will not make mention of him, nor speake any more in his name: what fol­lowes? Then his word was in my breast, as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing. If a gracious heart hath taken up such a sodaine resolution to conceale the word of God, he quickly repents of it, or smarts under it: He findes that word, as a burning fire in his bones, he is not able to bear it. I was weary with forbearing (saith the prophet) Nothing in the world will burthen the conscience, so much as concealed truth: and they who have taken a meditated resolution, that they will not reveale the word of God, may be sure, that word will one time or other reveale it selfe to them, in the Light and heat of a burning fire, seeding upon their consciences.

I have not concealed the words; whose words? The words of the Holy One. Who is that? The Holy One, is a periphrasis, for [Page 467] God, When you hear that Title, The holy One, you may know who is meant. This is a Title too bigge for any but a God; All holinesse is in God, and God is so holy, that properly he onely is Holy; Hence the Scripture sets God forth under this, as a peculiar attribute; The Holy One; The Prophets often use this addition or stile, The Holy One of Israel.

The Holy One; Is One separate or set apart from all filthinesse [...] Seperatus. and uncleannesse; No evil dwells with God, none comes near him. Therefore he is The Holy One, He is so separated from evil, that he cannot behold evil, or look on iniquity (Hab. 1. 13.) except with a vindictive eye. Sin never got a good look from God, or ever shall.

Further, God is called The Holy One, in three respects. First, Deus vocatur Sanctus Israel vel Sanctus simpliciter, vel quod sancté a nobis colendus est, vel quod i­pse solus vere▪ sanctus est. Because he is all holy in himself; Secondly, Because we receive all holiness from him: Thirdly, Because we are to serve him in holiness and righteousness all our daies. A Holy God must have a holy Service. God is The Holy One;

First, In his Nature; his essence is purity. Or, he is essential purity.

Secondly, he is holy in his Word; those are frequent adjuncts of the word of God; holy, pure and clean.

Thirdly, He is holy in his works: There is not the least ima­ginable stain or defilement upon any thing he hath done.

These three put together, lift up the glory of God in this title The Holy One. He that is holy throughout in his nature, holy in his word, holy in his works, is the Holy One; Yea, he is, as Moses stileth him in his triumphant song, Exod. 15. Glorious in holinesse, A glorious holy One.

Or again, We may consider God The holy One;

First, Radically and fundamentally, because the Divine nature is the root and original, the spring of all holinesse and purity; All holinesse is in God, and there is no holinesse to be had, but in God alone.

Secondly, God is The holy One, by way of example and patterne, or in regard of the rule and measure of holinesse: (1 Pet. 1. 16.) Be ye holy, as I am holy; the Holinesse of God, it is the exemplar and patterne of all the holinesse, that is in the creature.

Thirdly, God is The holy One, by way of motive; He is, as the rule of holinesse, so likewise the reason of our holinesse; therefore another Scripture saith, Be ye holy, for I am holy, I am The holy One, and that is the reason, why you must be holy too.

Fourthly, God is, The holy one, effectively, because he works, conveies and propagates all holiness, to, and in the creature. No­thing can frame a heart to holiness, but the finger of God. Man can no more make himself, or another holy, than he can redeem ano­ther or himself.

Fiftly, He is called, The holy One, by way of eminency or su­per-excellency; because his holiness is infinitely beyond all the holiness of men and Angels. Angels are holy, and God is pleased to say of men, that they are holy, but not man, nor Angel, can be called, The holy One. His supereminency in holiness shines forth in such beams and rayes, as these.

First, Holiness in God it is not a quality, but, his essence. Holiness in Angels is a quality, the essence of many Angels continues, though their holiness be lost and vanished; the lapsed Angels, who are now devils, keep their nature, but their holiness is gone; there­fore holiness was but a quality or accidental to them; So, in the Saints, holiness is an infusion, a quality, a grace; most men never had any holiness, and the man would remain, though his holiness should be lost. But in God, his essence and his holiness are the same; The holiness of God, It is the holy God, as the wisdom of God, it is the wise God: and the power of God, it is the powerful God. The attributes of God, for our learning, are distinguished from his na­ture, but, in him they are the same.

Secondly, God is The holy One eminently, above men and An­gels, because he is absolutely perfect in holiness. Absolutely per­fect: first, because he is holy, extensively (if we may so speak of God) in all parts, he is holy throughout; and then, he is holy in­tensively, as he is holy in all parts, so he is altogether holy in eve­ry part. Holy men have holiness in every part, yet they are holy but in part; and though Angels be holy in every part extensively, and have also a perfection of holinesse, yet they have not an ab­solute perfection of holiness; therefore Angels themselves are char­geable with folly, compared with God, Chap. 4. 18. God is so light, that in him there is no darkness at all, he is so holy, in him, that, there is no unholiness at all. But men, the best of men, all the saints upon earth, have darkness with their light, and unholiness mixed with their holiness.

Therefore in the third place, the eminency of God in holiness appeareth in this, that, God is ever equally holy, ever in the same degree and frame of holiness: Angels are so too, because they are [Page 469] confirmed; and though at the present, the Saints are not, yet, when Christ shall set them up, in that glorious estate, they shall keep the same frame for ever. But the Saints upon earth are unequally holy; For, first, they are growing, their estate here is an encreasing e­state, they are more holy one year than another, as they grow more in knowledge, so in every grace: And then, in regard of the exercise, they are more holy at one time, than at another; which of the Saints hath not found, or doth not find much variety in his spirit. Now a heart enlarged in prayer, and anon straightned, now a heart believing, and anon doubting; now humble, anon lifted up with pride, &c.

But as the holy One, is, perfectly and absolutely holy, so, he is ever equally in the same degree, and tenor of holiness, not the least variety or shaddow of turning in him. Put all these together, and the title is clear, How God by an excellency is called, The holy One. As he is so strong, that all the power of the creature, compared with his, is weakness, and so wise, that all the wisdom of the creature compared with his, is folly: So he is so holy, that, compared with him, all holiness, is unholy, and he alone, The holy One. Observe, hence,

First, That the holiness of man consists in his conformity unto God.

Holiness is our likeness to God, or the application of our minds and actions to God, as the Scholles define it. God, the holy One, Sanctitas dici­tur per quam mens seipsum & suos actus applicat Deo, is, (if we may so speak) the standard, the patern, and the ob­ject of all holiness. There is a two-fold conformity to God in holiness.

First, a conformity to the nature of God.

Secondly, a conformity to the will of God, or to that which God wills. These make up the total holiness of the creature.

First, Holiness is our conformity to the nature of God. And therefore beleevers are said to be partakers of the divine nature (2 Pet. 1. 4.) This participation, is our analogical resemblance un­to the divine nature: First, in his attributes. Secondly, in his af­fections. In his attributes, when we are patient, mercifull, just, faithful, true-loving, as God is. These are the image of God in us, and by these God becomes (as it were) visible in man. As those in­visible things of God, even his eternal power and God-head are seen in the things which are created, so those, other invisible things of God, even his eternal holinesse and purity, are seen in those, who are sanctified. And in the same sence that God speaks of Magi­strates [Page 470] in regard of his power deposited in their hands. I have said ye are gods, we also may say of all the faithfull, in regard of his ho­linesse infused into their hearts, ye are gods; and as to live, or doe sin­fully, is (as the Apostle phraseth it) to walk ( [...]) as men, so to live and doe holily is in our sphear to walke ( [...]) as God. And as this holinesse arises from a resemblance of God in his Attributes, so in his Affections; when we love what God loves, when we hate, what God hates; when, what, pleases God pleaseth us also; when, what provokes his Spirit, provokes ours. This is holinesse.

Secondly, Holinesse is our conformity to the will of God. That is, to whatsoever God wils us, either to doe, or not to doe. The will of God is the rule of holinesse, as his nature is the patterne of it. His internall will, called by the Schoole-men, The will of his good Voluntas bene­pla [...]iti. Voluntas signi. pleasure, is the firstly-first rule (as they speake) His externall will, or his will expressed and signified by his word, is the secondly-first rule of holinesse. Every action of man is holy or unholy according to it's conformity with, or variation from this will. There is no more holinesse in any worke, then there is of the will of God in any work; to doe holily and to doe the will of God are the same David a holy man is described by both these, Act. 13. 22. I have found David, the sonne of Jesse, A man after mine owne heart, ther's conformity to the will of God: which shall fulfill all my will, there's conformity to the will of God, the result of both is holinesse. Sicut impuritas nascitur ex non­actu inferiorum, ut cum facies aut vestis luto aspergitur vel cum anima per affectus inferio­ribus inordinatè inhaeret; I a pu­ritas oritur ex contactu supe­riorum cum af­fectus ad subli­miora & no­bilicra assurgit, & ijs inhaerit. Less de perfect. Div. lib. 8. c. 8.

Unholinesse and impurity arise from our conformity or adhesion to those things, which are unclean and unholy. In externals and corporals if a mans hand or his garment touch an uncleane thing he hath the marke or impression of that uncleanesse upon his hand or upon his garment; and this likenesse to an unclean thing, makes his hand or garment uncleane. So for inward uncleannesse or de­filment, when the soule inordinately cleaves, and the minde dren­ches it selfe in filthy things, or drinkes in filthy objects, when our thoughts are steeped in puddle waters, this defiles the minde, and makes our thoughts uncleane; Our thoughts are such, as the things they are familiar with: If they converse with filthy and uncleane things, with wordly and base things, the image and impression of such things is sealed upon our thoughts, and the spring of them our spirits. On the other side, by our conversing and reverend fa­miliarity with Christ; in holy Ordinances, we receive stamps and [Page 471] impressions of holinesse from him. When our hearts and affecti­ons are raised up and pitcht upon God, this makes them holy. Summa puritas consistit in ad­haesione cum Deo; nam Deus est ratio objecti­va & mensura sanctitatis Less. ubi ante.

God is the Objective cause of holinesse, looking upon him, we be­come holy (2 Cor. 3. 18.) We (saith the Apostle) all with open face, be­holding as in a glasse, the glory of the Lord (that is, we looking up­on that glory, holinesse and excellencie, which is in the Lord) are changed into the same image: That is, we are made conformable unto him: we receive (as it were) the engravings of holinesse upon our soules by beholding the Holy One. The eye of faith (as well, yea more, then the eye of sence) affects the hearts. Labans sheepe conceived according to the colour of the rods, which lay be­fore them in the water troughes. Vision assimilates both in nature and in grace, yea and in glory too. In heaven we shall be perfectly holy, because we shall perfectly (in Christ, who is the expresse image of his person) see God, and so be like him, that's the Apostles argu­ment, 1 Joh. 3 1. We shall he like him, for we shall see him as he is, And proportionably here, such as our visions of God are, such is our like­nesse unto God. Secondly, observe.

They who want holinesse, must goe to God for it; for he is the holy One. Are any of your hearts unholy? Whither will you goe? To what Coast will you trade for holinesse? Or where shall you finde the merchandize of it? Goe whither you will, goe to what holy Ordinance, to what holy duty, to what holy Minister you will, your vessels will returne unfraight and emptie of holinesse, if you tread not to the holy God. We must deale with Ordinances and by Ordinances; but, if we onely have to doe with them, neglecting to meet with God, we shall make nothing of them, we shall not traffick in them to any spirituall enriching or advantage. Ordinances have a relative holinesse or a holinesse passing through them; but they have no inherent holinesse, or holinesse passed by them; They are Conduit-pipes, not springs, or the well-head. Therefore as when you would have mercy, you goe to the merci­full God; As, when you would have pardon of sin, you goe to the sinne pardoning God; As when you would have wisdome and light to direct your way, you goe to the wise God and the Father of lights. So when you would have holinesse, and be made pure, whither will ye goe, but to the pure and holy God? Be diligent in holy duties, and holy Ordinances, but stay not in them, passe through them, and never rest till you come to God in Christ, who is, The holy One, and he onely can, and he hath said he will make you holy.

Observe; thirdly,

All sin and unholiness are contrary to the very name and na­ture of God. Contrary to the name of God, He is called holy; and contrary to the nature of God, He is the holy One. And in this, we see the reason, why God hates sin with a perfect hatred; man hates that, which is contrary to his nature, and contrary to his name. And in this also we see the reason, why God is such a severe avenger of sin, He is the holy One: Can he (think you) take part with, or spare that which is contrary to himself? Sin, as much as in it lieth, puts God out of the world, therefore sin is called God-murther, as being that, which would murther God: Deicidium. Sin would not allow him a being in the world, who gave the world it's be­ing. Sin (in the nature of it) is, The unholy thing, and God is, The holy One; These two must contend for ever: so far as things or persons are unholy, they directly strike at the Being of God; Sin would put down all rule and all dominion, but it's own.

Observe, Fourthly,

They who despise holiness despise God himself. They who de­spise holiness, despise the very glory of God, God is glorious in holiness, and this is his glorious Name, THE HOLY ONE. Some of the Prophane wretched Jewes, derided and blasphemed God, under this title; the Prophet had long threatned judgement, and had told them, that the holy God would be avenged of them for their filthiness and profaness for their hypocrifie and idolatry. But when these wretches saw God delaying to come out, and bring forth the treasures of his wrath against them, they fall a jeering, and they jeer at God, under this title (Isa. 5, 19.) Let him make speed and hasten his work that we may see it; as if they had said, God is too slow let him make more hast, and let the counsel of the holy One of Israel draw nigh, and come that we may know it; him, that you have so often told us of, The holy One, let him make hast and bring on his work. With­out question God came speedily upon those, and he will come spee­dily upon all those unclean spirits and tongues who blaspheme that holy Name, The holy One.

Lastly, Hence we learn, Why none can see God, why none have any fitness for communion with God, but holy Ones, holy persons; the reason is, because God is the holy One. That great Law is gone out from the mouth of God, Levit. 10. 3. I will be san­ctified in those that come near me; why sanctified? Because God is the holy one; Unlesse we sanctifie God, we cannot draw nigh [Page 473] to God. As holinesse is a separation from evil, so i [...] is an approxi­mation to the chiefest good. But some may demand, how can man sanctifie God? God sanctifies us, but can we sanctifie him? We cannot sanctifie God, as he sanctifies us. We doe not sanctifie God by adding or communicating any holiness unto him; but we san­ctifie God by acknowledging his holiness, or by acknowledging that he is, The Holy One; drawing nigh unto God with a holy heart, with holy affections is the sanctfying of God. For this is the lan­guage of such preparation, I have a holy God to go unto, therefore I must have a holy heart to come unto him with; this is sanctify­ing God; And that's the reason why none can see God, but they, that are holy, Heb. 12. 14. Without holiness, no man shall see the Lord; because God himself is holy, therefore they cannot see God, who are unholy. There must be an inward holiness, holiness in the Organ: to take in the holiness of the object; God first works holiness in us, and then we behold him, the holy God: And that was the reason, why the Prophet (Isa. chap. 6. when the voice pro­claimed that thrice holy Name of God, Holy, Holy, Holy,) cried out, I am undone, because I am a man of unclean lips, I have an unclean heart, and how shall I stand before this holy, holy, holy God; This made his spirit recoyl, though he was a holy Prophet: If the remainders of unholinesse in him, made his spirit faint, when there was an appearance of the holy God: How will they that are nothing but corruption, or a lump of uncleanness, lying still in the dregs of nature, be able to stand before God, The holy One, the holy, holy, holy One!

This is the summe of the first reason, upon which Job grounds his request to die, it was not the misery he suffered, but the integrity in which he had lived. He had not concealed the words of the holy One, therefore as his affliction made his life troublesome to him, so the goodness of his cause and conscience, made death welcome to him.

JOB Chap. 6. Vers. 11, 12, 13, 14.

What is my strength, that I should hope? And what is mine end that I should prolong my life?

Is my strength, the strength of stones? Or is my flesh of brass?

Is not my help in me? And is wisdom driven quite from me?

To him that is afflicted, pity should be shewed from his friend; but he for­saketh the fear of the Almighty.

JOB (as hath been shewed) in this context from the 8th verse, renewes his former request and desire of death, confirming it by divers arguments, some of which were opened in the 10th verse, especially, that, from the clearness, and integrity of his own con­science, in that, he had not concealed the words of the the holy One: He had dealt faithfully in the cause of God, and therefore he was not afraid to appear before God. And his desire did not hang a­bout his lips, as if it would return and deny it self: therefore in this 11th verse he puts forth two reasons further, why he moves or re-enforces his motion to die. The first is grounded upon the small hope, he had to live long, if he should desire it, What is my strength, that I should hope? The second is grounded upon the strong hope, yea, assurance which he had, that it should be well with him in death, or that death, could be no dammage to him. And what is my end, that I should prolong my life? Put these two together: And then consider, is it any wonder, that a man in much misery desires to die speedily, when he hath no hope, no ground of hope, that he can live long, and when he hath no fear, no ground, no nor shaddow of fear, that it shall be ill with him, when he dies? This I conceive is the sum and strength of his reasoning, contained in the 11th verse.

I shall now open the words distinctly.

What is my strength, that I should hope?

Some render it, What is my strength, that I should bear? that I should be able to sustain this weighty burthen, this mighty load of affliction, pressing my wounded soul, and wearied body. Thus it refers to his present sufferings, to the enduring and standing un­der [Page 475] which, he found his own strength altogether insufficient. And so the [My] in the text, What is [my] strength, seems to be His sustinendis impar sum, haec mea vita mise­riis obnoxia sustentatur, non meis viribus, sed divina gra­tia, fide, dile­ctione in filium Dei. Pined. opposed to some other strength; As if Job had said, Eliphaz you advised me (in the former Chapter, verse. 8.) to seek unto God, and to commit my cause unto him, to seek help at his hands. Why do you think, I have not done that, all this while? Do you be­leeve that I have stood out these assault in My own strength? What is My strength, that I should bear? That I should bear this burthen so long, as I have born it? Surely I have been held up by the power of God and prayer all this while: God hath put his everlasting armes under me, otherwise I had fallen before this day, hid I not prayed in ayd from heaven, I had not lived thus long upon the earth; for what is my strength compared to these burthens, which are upon me?

This is a good sence; For, as the Apostle speakes (Gal 2. 10.) The life which I now live, I live by the faith of the Son of God, So Job seems to say, the life which I have lived, ever since these afflictions have encompass'd me, I have lived by the power of God, and the strength of faith in him. What i [...] my strength, that I should bear? We have this treasure (saith the Apostle, 2 Cor. 4. 7.) in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power, may be from God, and not from us; As he speakes there, respecting the burthen of the Mi­nistry: So we may, in respect of any burthen of trouble, or weight of affliction. We have these afflictions laid upon our earthen vessels (and one would wonder, that an earthen vessel should not cracke [...] Moratus, prae­stolatus. Vel significat anxia spe potiendi vo­to rem aliquam expectare, & aegrè ferre pro­tractionem rei expectatae. Chemnit. Spes, est, cum praeparatio ad boni futuri & promissi suscep­tionem, tum pa­tientia morae ex intuitu illius boni. Coc. and shatter to pieccs under them) but it is, that the excellency of the power might be from God, and not from us; when we are weak, then we are strong, strong in God, and in the power of his might. God loves to shew the world, what his strength can doe in a weak creature, as well, as what his grace and mercy can do for a sinful creature.

This (I say) is a good sence, but the word rather signifies to hope; and yet these two are not at any great odds: for hope is the strength, the bearing-strength of the soul: What is my strength, that I should hope? That I should wait and tarry, that I should expect or stay for such and such changes, as thou hast promised? Psalm. 130 5. we have these words put together, I wait for the Lord, my soul doth wait; and in his word do I hope. The soul which is in a hoping condition, is also in a waiting condition; waiting and ho­ping ever attend the same thing. No man will wait at all for that of [Page 476] which, he hath no hope, and he who hath hope, will wait always He gives not over waiting, till he gives over hoping. The object of hope is some future good, but the act of hoping is a present good, and that is present pay to bear our charges in waiting. So then the word im­plies both a patient writing, and a hopefull trusting. So Christ expoundes it, Mat. 12. 21. rendring that of the prophet, Isa. 42. 4. The isles shall wait for his Law, thus, In his name shall the Gen­tiles trust. Noah (after the strength of the deluge was spent) Gen 8. 10, 12. opened the window of the Arke, and sent forth the Dove, and she returned; then saith the text, He waited seven daies, and again he waited, yet other seven daies, hoping at last the floud would be dried up, and the waters return into their ancient channels. Now (saith Job) what is my strength, that I should hope or expect de­liverance, and therefore, why should I wait for it. The waters of my afflictions are so deepe, and swolne so high that I have no hope to see dry ground againe.

And in this passage he seemes to answer, what Eliphaz speak in the 5th Chapter, vers. 16. and 25. (for doubtlesse Job applies him­selfe exactly to what Eliphaz had spoken, and the truest interpre­tation of his answer will be in finding out and suiting the references to what the other Propounded) Eliphaz in the 16. verse of the fifth Chapter (where he makes a report of the wonderfull workes of God) had said, So the poore hath hope, and iniquity stoppeth her mouth: And at the 25, verse, he tels Job that a godly man (not­withstanding all his afflictions) may know that his tabernacle shall be in peace, and that his seed shall be very great. Job in an­swer to those words, replies, What is my strength that I should hope. As if he had said, Eliphaz you speake of great hopes that the poore may have, and you speak of a peaceable Tabernacle, of a flourishing off-spring; Alas my condition is such, I am so worne out with paine, with sicknesses, with diseases, with di­stempers with griefes that I have no hope left in regard of any strength in me, ever to enjoy such promises. What is my strength, Quae fortitudo mea, ut sperem liberos. Vatab. Quid in longio­rem spem me adducitis quum sperando non fim, jam propè [...]. mortuus videat Hoc à lobo di­citur, ut con­sil [...]j importu­nitatem, ex­presso sensitivae partis affectu retunderet, non quod de divina potentia diffi­deret. that I should hope? What is my strength that I should expect to live to see such good daies, as you speak of, that my Tabernacle should be in peace, that I should have plenty, that I should have a numerous issue? Alas my strength is gone; what is my strength that I should looke after these things. Not that Job measured all his hope by his owne strength; but here he expresses the griefe and paine, which was in his sensitive part, or [Page 477] upon his outward man, thereby to answer the sowre reproofs and sweet promises of Eliphaz: For we find Job himself in the thir­teenth Chapter, vers. 13. resolving thus: Though he kill me, yet will I trust (or hope) in him; he would trust and hope in God though he died, therefore he did hope, while he lived. And it is the property of that grace (and where it is in strength, it sh [...]wes as much) to hope against hope: Rom. 4. 18. Who against hope be­leeved in hope; When there was no strength in Abraham, no pos­sibility in nature, yet against hope, he beleeved in hope: So at this time there was such a grace in Job, he had a hope, by which he could hope against hope; but when he looked into his own stock of strength, What is my strength, that I should hope? I know the strength of God, is a rock sure enough for my hope to anchor in: Abraham, said in effect, what is my strength, that I should hope to have a childe? for he looked upon himself as a dead man, but, saith he, there is power in God; he knew his own weakness, but he considered it not, waxing strong in faith, and giving glory to God. So here, while Job saith, What is my strength that I should hope? my strength is dried up and withered, and so is my hope in my own strength: The strength of God is vigorous and green, and in him my hope also is green and vigorous: Though all the earth about us, be like a dry heath and barren wilderness, yet our hope buds and blossoms like a plant, while it is rooted by the springs of heavenly promises,

And what is mine end, that I should prolong my life;

The letter of the Hebrew is: That I should prolong or lengthen out my soul, that my soul should inhabit longer in the taber­nacle [...] of my body: The word prolong, is differently joyned to life, or dayes, Deut. 5. 16. Honour thy father and thy mother as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee, that, thy dayes may be prolonged, &c Ezek. 12 22. Son of man, what is that proverbe that you have in the land of Israel, saying, The dayes are prolong­ed, and every vision faileth? To prolong dayes, and prolong life, are the same. Yet hear the word (Nephesh) soul, which we translate, life, may be taken for, desire, which is a vehement act of the soul. The soul expresses it self, so much in desires, that the same word may expresse both. And so we may render Jobs sence, thus, What is my end that I should lengthen out, or extend my desires any further after the things of this world: or that I [Page 478] should defer, and put off my desires after the things of the world to come: Is there any thing in this life worth my staying for it, or any thing so worthless in the next, that I should not wish presently to enjoy it? In this sence the word (Nephesh) is often used, as Gen. 23. 8. Abra­ham speaks to the children of Heth, If it be your soul or your desire, we translate, if it be your mind, that I should bury my dead. So Prev. 23 2. If thou be a man given to thy appetite, or whose desires are thy Lord and master, as the elegancy of that place beares. And again, Psal. 27. 12. Psal. 41. 2. Eccl 6. 9. The word is applied, to signifie the will or desire. So here,

What is mine end, that I should prolong my life, or my desire of life?

His [End] may be considered two wayes.

First, His end, may be taken for the latter part of his life, which Eliphaz promised would be very comfortable, Thou shalt come to thy grave in a good old age, as a shock of corn commeth into the flore; As if Job should say, you are promising me good dayes, and a happy old age, but, what is mine end? what's the latter part of a mans life, that he should desire to prolong his dayes, to take it out? why should I desire to prolong my life, I am now well stricken in years, and as for the end, the latter part of a mans life, it is nothing (for the most part) but trouble and sorrow? As old Barzillai (2 Sam. 19. 35.) when David offered him the pleasures of the Court) answers, I am thus old, and can I taste my meat, and taste my drink, or hear musique? What is the Fagge-end of mans life, that one should hunger after it? The sweetest comforts of this life are in the fore-part of life, in the spring of youth, in the strength and flower of age. As for the winter of life, what is that but wet and cold, but clouds and darkness? What is my end (of old age) that I should desire my life to be prolonged or eeked out to that.

But rather, we may take this End; First, For the end of his troubles; As if he had said, What end so gainfull or comfortable can I have of these evils, that should recompence my pains in bearing them, till I receive it? No worldly comforts can answer my sorrows; and therefore why should I desire to prolong my life for them?

Secondly, Take End, for the very last term of life, not that latter part or condition of a mans life, troublesome old age, as before; or a renewed estate as here. But take End, for the ending▪ the [Page 479] termination, the period of life; What is my end, that I should pro­long my life? and so, End is as much as death, what is my death that I should desire to live? I know no evil in death, that should make me afraid of the end of my life; I know no such trouble in dying, that I should be desirous to spinne out this troublesome life longer, surely the trouble and pain of death, is not so much as the present trouble and pain of my life, and as for any other trouble, I fear none: then, What is my end, that I should prolong my life, that I should not desire death, or that you should be so angry with me for desiring it? Hence observe, first,

There is no strength in man, that may give him assured hope of long life; What is my strength that I should hope? No, though man be in the flourish of his age, the greenesse of his years: yet what is youth, or strength, or beauty? what all those fair leaves and fruits, which hang upon and adorn this goodly tree, that he should hope to hand long? Man in his best estate, is altogether vanity, Psal. 39. 5. He that hopes to live upon any of these things, hopes in a vain thing, & trusts, but in a shadow. Our hopes to live this na­tural life as well as the spiritual, and eternal, must be in the living God. The Image of death sits upon the best of our strength and beauty; while we grow, we decline, and while we flourish, we wi­ther. The lengthening of our dayes, is the shortning of them, and all the time we live, is but a passage unto (and should be but a preparation for) death. We are most miserable, if in this life only we have hope; and we are most foolish, if our hopes of this life, be in our own strength.

And because there is no strength in nature, which may give us hope to live long; It is our greatest wisdome, to consider what provision we have in grace, to maintain our hopes, that we shall live for ever. They are in an ill case, who when they cannot hope to live long, care not to settle their hopes of living eternally. It is a most sad spectacle, to see a languishing body, and a langui­shing hope meet in one man. Some have a Kalender in their bones, shewing them, they have but few dayes here, and many distem­pers upon the whole body, crying in their ears with a loud voice, what is your strength, that you should hope to live? who yet pre­pare not at all to die. They are both unready and unwilling to be dissolved, when they see no hope to keep up their tabernacle from desolution.

Secondly, (taking the word in the last sense, which I conceive [Page 480] rather to be the mind of the holy Ghost in this place) observe,

That there is no evil in the death of a godly man, which should make him unwilling to die, or which should make him linger after this life. What is the end of a godly man, that he should pro­long his life? All the bitterness of death is removed, or sweet­ned by Christ. Death the King of terrours, is made a servant, to let us in, to our comforts, by the power of Christ, that prince of life who hath abolished death and brought life and immortality to light by the Gospel. A believer buries all his feares of death in the grave of Christ. He looks upon death as the funeral of his so rows, and the resurrection of his joyes. When the Psalmist had described the troubles and stormy conflicts of a godly man, together with the flourishing outward pompe of the wicked, he concludes with this advice, Mark the righteous man (observe him well, take special notice of him) the latter and of that man is peace; if his end be peace, there is nothing in his end, which can make him afraid of it, or put it off. All desire peace, they especially, Pacem te pos­cimus omnes. who are wearied out with war. The life of the holiest man is a warfare, and his end is peace. Then what is his end, that he should prolong his life.

When a worldly man looks upon his end, he saith, O what is my end, that I should desire to die? His end is such, as makes him justly afraid to die. There is nothing in the end of a wicked man, but matter to feed the fear of death, and the desire of prolonging life, as long as he can. This is the reason, why, when God cals him to die, he is deaf at the call; yea, that call is death to him, before he dies. Lot had a mind to prolong his time in Sodom, it was a goodly City, and he was not well assured, whether to goe, or how he should be lodged next night. This caused him to linger so long, till the Angels came and thrust him out: Natural men have all their portion and estates in the Sodom of this world. And if they hear a message of departing or going out, they linger and make excuses, they run behind the door or hang about the posts, till God thrusts them out of the world, and puls from them their pleasures, by head and shoulders, as we say. They would never leave the world, if they might enioy it, because they have nothing to en­joy beyond it.

A worlding groans, because he must be uncloathed of his house of earth, and the Saints groan earnestly, that they may be cloath­ed upon with their house from heaven; Who would not be willing [Page 481] to exchange a suit of flesh, a suit of sackcloth, and sorrow, for a suit of glory, for a cloathing of immortality and garments of everla­sting praise.

Ver. 12. Is my strength, the strength of stones? Or is my flesh of brass?

These words may refer to the former part of the eleventh verse, What is my strength, that I should hope? What is it? Let us seri­ously Deficio, Saxeus aut Calibe us non sum. Lapi­des corpora sunt, non solum gravia, sed ro­busta & dura quae non facilè cedunt aliis corporibus, un­dè robur lapi­dum pro duri­tie. examine and consider what my strength is, Is my strength, the strength of stones? or is my flesh of brass? Am I made of such hard mettle, think you, that I am able to endure any thing? Only a body of brass and sinewes of Iron, are strong enough to endure this tryal. Stones and brass are hard bodies and heavy bodies, they can bear blows and knocks without breaking; They yield not easily to the hammer; It is hard to make an impression upon them, with many, and those violent strokes. To say a man is as strong as stones, or that, he hath a body of brasse, is to give him strength, which is not mans, and to set him two degrees below himself. Beasts are stronger, and can endure more hardship then man. Trees are stronger, and can endure more than Beasts. Stones are yet stronger, and can endure more then Trees. There­fore, while he asks, whether his strength be not only, like that of beasts, who have no reason, or like that of trees, which have no sense; but like that of stones and brass, which have no vegetation or growth, he puts it to the utmost, as if he had said, If a man had as much strength as a Beast, or a Tree, he must needs fall at these stroaks and troubles, but it seems, ye put me lower then senseless beasts or trees, and that I can stand it out against all storms and batteries, like a stony rock, or a brazen wall. I confesse, though the oxe loweth, when he wants fodder, and the wilde Asse brayeth, when he hath no grasse, yet the stone complains not, when you give it no food, nor doth brass cry out, when you melt it in a Furnace: unless you can find, that I am in nature, like stones or brass, you have no rea­son to find fault with me. Allow me to be either man or beast, and you must allow me to be sensible of my sorrows, and destroyable by them. Only stones can be thus trampled on, and brass thus hammer'd without pain and dying.

As when man (in his spiritual capacity) is said in Scripture to have a heart of stone, an iron sinew, a brow of Brass. It notes him resolved, against all threats, and strong, against all oppositions of [Page 482] the word, to commit the evil of sin. So in his natural capacity, to say his strength is the strength of stones, notes him a man able to bear all the evils of trouble, and to stand against all the stormes of tribulation.

Such kind of speaking is frequent among the ancient Writers, Homines Ada­mantini, ferrei, saxei, nati è scopulis. [...]li robur & aes trip ex circa pectus. Hor. Graeci vocant. [...] & [...]. who when they would express a man of undanted courage, a man whose strength would not easily be broken, or his spirit be taken down; A man insuperable, whom no difficulties could o­vercome. Of such an one they say, he hath, An heart of brass and a back of steel, he is a man made up of stones, born of a rock; He is a man of Adamant, he hath Treble brass about his breast; as he was described, who first ventured in his ship to sea. The com­man use of the word hath made it proverbial in all languages; for a man of more strength then is commonly found in man, or for a Master of dangers and extremities.

Jobs question denies, Is my strength, the strength of stones? Or is my flesh of brass? No, it is not: As if he had said, I am made of flesh and bloud, as well as others, I must shortly yeeld to these stroaks, I am not able to hold out and to contend everlastingly with afflictions, I cannot stand against these assaults and batteries for ever, I am made of the same mould, whereof your selves are, I am sensible how it is with me. I feel what I endure, and I cannot long endure what I feel, My strength is not the strength of stones. Note hence,

First, Mans natural constitution makes him sensible of affliction, and subauable by it.

Mans body is no impregnable Castle. We are not made of stones and brasse, but of flesh and bloud; I will not contend for ever (saith God, Isa. 57. 16.) neither will I be alwayes wrath. For the spirit should fail before me; &c. The spirit of a man (that is his cou­rage and resolution) are farre stronger then his flesh (namely his natural temper and constitution) and yet that cannot hold cut for ever. The Spirit will come down, whether we will or no, if God contend long with us: how then must the flesh wither like a leafe before him? And therefore, the bodies, the flesh and bloud of the damned, who are to bear the wrath and contendings of God for ever, their flesh and bloud (I say) are (in a sence) made spi­ritual, that is, they have more strength given them, then flesh and bloud yeeld naturally, otherwise it were impossible for them to hold out for ever under the wrath of God, and the torment of [Page 483] their accursed condition. Their strength is made the strength of stones, and their flesh as brass, they are made immalliable: their sence of pain shall be admirably quicked, and yet they shall con­tinue, as if they had no sence at all: they shall be for ever wounded, and never die of their wounds. As it is in reference to that everla­sting misery, so in proportion to these temporal miseries; There is no [...]rength of man, no flesh and bloud, able to endure and hold out, if God lets out his hand, to afflict, and puts not under his hand to support.

Vers. 13, Is not my help in me? And is wisdom driven quite from me?

This and the verse following, are of a very difficult construction and understanding, which caused a learned Interpreter to say, If Locus difficilis siquis a lius in hoc libro, & quem ego adbuc non intelligo. Drus. there be any hard text in the whole book, this is one; and after all his thoughts about it, he concludes with this ingenuous acknowledg­ment, I do not yet understand the meaning of it.

First, as we read it, The text seems to carry a harsh connexion with the words fore-going. There Job queries, Is my strength, the strength of stones? And yet immediately to say, Is not my help in me? sounds incongruous. For if he had help in him, he had strength in him, and such as might well be called, the strength of stones, ex­traordinary strength. So then, Iob having said with his last breath, that he had no such strength, how is it, that here he should say and more, strongly affirm, that he had such strength, so much this question implies, Is not my help in me? As if he had said, do not I know which way to help my self? How to extricate my self out of this condition?

Besides, how is this a truth? For there is no man, that hath his help in himself, not help enough in himself for any natural work, much lesse for any spiritual work, and most of all, lesse for the holy carriage of the heart under affliction, or to deliver him­self from it. Man hath no help in himself. The voice of the Church is, Our help standeth in the Name of the Lord; and the voice of Da­vid, was, The Lord is my helper; how then doth Iob say, Is not my help in me? Mans ruine is in himself, but how unlike is this to the voice of truth, to say, My help is in my self? We can undoe our selves fast enough, but we cannot repair and make our selves up a­gain.

Nor can any creature be our help, no man, no Angel can be [Page 484] our help. God reproveth the Jewes, Isa. 31. For going down to Egypt for help, though they were a strong people: Certainly it is as bad, for a man, to make himself his help, as to make another man his help. How then shall we give a wholesome understanding of these words, Is not my help in me? And is wisdome driven quite from me?

For the clearing of it consider the divers readings. Some thus, Was not my help in me? And so they make the meaning to Nonne auxili­um meum in me? sc. fuit. Vatabl. Nonne quoad potui me juvi? minimè fui pu­sillanimus, me quoad fieri po­test & erigo & fussento. be this; Did not I help my self, as much as I could? Was I faint-hearted and cowardly? Did I sink as a man of a poor spi­rit under the burden? Did not I put my self forth to the utter­most, that I could, to stand under these troubles and afflictions? There is much in that, for some men do not help themselves, as they might, but their own spirits sinke, and their hearts fail, yea, their hearts fail before their strength failes. Job disclaims this, I did not so, I helpt my self while I was able, I put out the utmost of my power, to bear and set a good face on't, as long as ever I could, Was not my help in me?

The Septuagint, with the Greeks in general referre these words to God, making Job speak thus, Did not I trust in him? But Nonne in ipso considebam, sed adjutorium à me recessit, ne­gavit me mise­rie ordia & vi­sitatio Domini despexit. Sept. my help is departed from me, and the mercy of the most High hath with-drawn it self from me: As if he had said, I never put my trust in my self, nor did I promise my self great matters, as from my self, for, alas! What is my strength? I am acquainted well enough with mine own frailty, but that which I onely trusted to, hath left me; I trusted unto God, and unto his help; now he seemes to forsake and with-draw his assistance from me; But I leave this with the Authors, it hath little authority with me, or sutableness to the course and tenour of Jobs spirit under these af­flictions.

The Vulgar translates the whole verse negatively, and so it makes a plain and a good sense. Whereas we read it interroga­tively, Is not my help in me? &c. He reades it thus, Behold my Ecce non est a uxilium mihi [...]n me & necessarii quoque mei recesserunt à me? Vulg. help is not in me, and my friends who should help me, are de­parted from me; That which we translate wisdome: Is wisdome departed from me? He translates, friends: my friends, who should be my helpers, are departed from me. And so the meaning of all is, as if Job had said, I cannot help my self, and they who should, have deserted me: And so connects or joins it with that, which went before; What is my strength that I should hope? my strength is [Page 485] not the strength of stones; there is no help in me, and they who should help me, are departed from me; I was once an eye to the blind, and a foot to the lame (Chap. 29. 15.) When a man hath no help in himself, he may have it in another; If a man want an eye, he may have an eye of his neighbour, and if he want a hand, his friend may be a hand to him; but (saith Job) they that should be eyes and hands, helpers unto me, are gone and departed from me.

There is yet another rendering, which makes a very clear sence; What though I have no help in me, is wisdome driven quite from me? Though I have no strength, and so no help in my self, wisdom is not therefore driven quite from me. As if he had said, will you conclude that I am a wicked man, an hypocrite and a fool, be­cause I am not able to help and deliver my self out of these trou­bles?

Fifthly, consider the words as we translate them, with which most of the Rabbins and Jewish writers concur, only they usual­ly expresse the text affirmatively, we interrogatively, yet both e­quivalent, and meet in the same meaning. Our Question, Is not my help in me? is to be resolved into this affirmation, my help is in me; and the latter branch, Is wisdome departed from me? into this negation, wisdome is not departed from me: my help is in me, and my An non auxi­lium meum in me, quo me tue­ri possum ac defendere? in­nuit innocenti­am suam ac vi­tae integritatem qua nunquam destitutus fuit: aut rectam ra­tienem & sapi­entiam quam postea Tusiah Appellat, Drus. An judicio & ratione destitu­or ut dignoscere nequeam recta ab insulsis, qua­lia sunt verba vestra, non sum mentis inops. wisdome is not departed from me: Jobs sence may be taken thus; Have I not that in me, which is, and will be a help unto me, notwithstanding all the objections and assaults which you make a­gainst me? Have not I that in me, which may furnish me with wisdome to answer all the exceptions which you have taken at my complaints? Master Broughtons translation favours this sence very much, have not I my defence? and is judgement driven away from me? Though I thus complain and desire death, yea renew my desire? Have not I my defence? have I nothing to say, why I made that request? have I no argument to help my selfe and bear up my spirit under the weight of these calamities? Is wis­dome quite departed from me? Doe you take me for a man deser­ted of God, deserted of his spirit, and deserted of my own wisdom and understanding too, because I am deserted of the world, and destitute of outward comforts? And so the help which Job knew he had in store, was the Innoceney and integrity of his heart, Is not my help in me? I have no help, no strength, no comfort in my flesh, what is my flesh; my flesh is not of brasse, but have [Page 486] I no help in me neither? my outward man is destroyed, my house of clay is almost battered down, tottering, failing it is, but have I nothing within, to help at a dead lift? have I no grace, no hope, no testimony of a good conscience, no witness in my self? Doe you think me clean dis [...]obed and stript, and emptied of all wis­dome and comfort? Hath the Devil, think you, robbed me of my grace? have the Sabeans plundered and spoiled me of my understanding? Is not my help within me, notwithstanding all the troubles that are upon me? Thus the interpretation is fair and clear, that, when all his out­ward comforts were gone, when the strength of his flesh could hold no longer; yet then he had help within him; & his spirit could bear, though his flesh could not Grace can hold out beyond nature; and when bodily strength can do no more, wisdom comes in with her Auxiliaries.

Is not my help in me, and is wisdome departed from me?

The word [wisdome] in the Hebrew, is of various significati­ons, [...] Significat [...]e­gem, sapienti­am, subsistenti­am Et lex [...]e­pulsa est á me? Pagn, N [...]n­quid officium impulsum fuit à me? Vatab. Num subsisten­tia impulsa est a me? Regia. Quid facult as subsistendi me destituit? Ty­gyr. as was touched, Chap. 5. 12. Here one renders it, The law is not departed from me. As if his meaning were; I never forsooke the law of God. Another thus; Was my duty driven from me? As if his meaning were, I ever kept close to the rule of my place and calling. A third; Is my subsistence driven from me? So a fourth; Is my ability of subsisting gone from me? As if he had said, cannot I live, because I have not the world to live upon? To which sence, those words of Christ are appliable, Luke. 12. 15. The life of man consists not, in the aboundance of the things which he possesseth; All which interpretations meet to make up a compleat Apology of Jobs piety, constancy, patience and flourishing resolutions, in his dying, withering condition. The Sabeans drove away his cat­tel, but they could not drive away his understanding; They of­fered violence to his substance, but his reason and his graces were untoucht. Hence observe, first,

That when all outward helps depart from a godly man, he hath somewhat abiding in him, to help and stay up his heart. As when the outward glory and strength of the Church is utterly decayed, Yet (the Prophet tells us, Isa. 6. 13.) in it shall be a Tenth, as a Teyle▪tree, and as an Oake, whose substance is in them, when they cast their leaves, so the Holy seed shall be the strength thereof. Thus also, when the outward glory and strength of any true mem­ber of the Church is utterly decayed, even then, he shall be as an [Page 487] Oak, his substance shall be in him, the seed of Holinesse shall be his substance. Is not my helpe in me? I know my estate is gone, my beauty is gone, my strength is gone, the strength (I mean) of my flesh, yet I have invisible supports, somewhat unseen to trust unto. It is the comfort of beleevers, that they have an estate, ri­ches and possessions, lying as far beyond the reach of mens pow­er, as their eye; and as far beyond the reach of Satans malice, as either. When they feel nothing but pain in the flesh, when no­thing but weakness inhabits the house of clay, the outward man, then the inward man is renewed with sweet refreshings, and strong consolations day by day. The spirit of a man (of a godly man) will bear his infirmities, when his body cannot. The strength of nature is not as the strength of stones, nor is the flesh of brass, but the strength of grace, is stronger then the strength of stones, and the spirit is more dureable then brasse: Grace wears not out by using, nor doth it spend by employing: Afflictions are but the higher services and employments of grace: A stock of grace, is an inexhaustible trea­sure, and a good heart, assures us better then the barrs of a Castle. Faith and a good conscience, are (under Christ) our best helpes in trouble; they are friends that will never forsake us: They are to us as their Authour, who, hath promised that he, will not. Grace is our participation with the Divine Nature, and grace participates with the divine nature in this, it is an unchangeable good, an ever­lasting comfort.

And yet we must take this warily, grace and holiness, faith and a good conscience, are not to be trusted upon, no more then riches or any outward meanes. We may make an Idol of our faith, and a vaine thing of a good conscience: The meaning then is, faith and a good conscience are our best helds and friends, because faith car­ries us unto Christ who is our best help. Faith pitches upon Christ and a good conscience, feasts us in the favour of God. Faith alone is no help, but faith is our help, because it is not alone: Grace left alone would be our strength but little more then nature is, and our spirit little more then the flesh. And therefore our comforts are not to be resolved into this, That we have grace in our hearts, but into this, That we and our graces are in the hand of Christ. Faith can live no where but upon Christ; That which faith respects as our help, is Christ in whom we beleeve, not the act of beleeving, We are helped by the grace within us, but the grace within us, is not our help. Secondly Observe;

A godly man in the darkest affliction or night of sorrow, finds a light of holy wisdome to answer all the objections of his enemies, and the suspitions of his friends; Is wisdome departed quite from me? Doe you think I have nothing to say? nothing to reply by way of apologie for what I have don or spoken?

Though Job had many afflictions upon him and his friends against him, yet see how he recollects himselfe, Is not my help in me? he makes out the goodnesse of his cause, in the midst of a thousand evils, and can plead his own integrity, in the throng of many jea­lousies and contradictions. Is not my help in me? Doe you think, you have so daunted me, that I am not able to make out my own estate? or that I know not what I am? The truth is, sometimes God leaves his servants in so much darkness, for their tryal and exercise, that they cannot see their own estates, but cry out, they are lost and undone; Many a good soul cannot reflect upon his graces, or get his heart into any communion with Christ in pro­mises. This is walking in darkness, and seeing no light. As our sins are sometimes secrets to us, so also our graces may. But let a man be encompast with never so many outward afflictions, yet if his spirit be free, he is able to judge of his own interests, through all the black clouds which hang over him, through all the distra­ctions and confusions that are about him. The eye of faith is usually quickest, in a dark night. And while trouble is near at hand, beholds Christ, near at hand. He can never be without help, who carries his help about him, or within him. Nor can he utterly want counsel to direct him, whose heart is as a councel Table, where Christ (the wisdom of God) is ever President and in the Chair. My worldly comforts are quite driven from me, but wisdome is not: I am afflicted, and therefore should not be thus suspected, but pittied.

Vers. 14. To him that is afflicted, pitty should be shewed from his friend; but he forsaketh the fear of the Almighty.

This verse begins the third Section of the chapter wherein Job draws up a strong charge against his friends, for their uncharita­blenesse. See the progresse and links of his Discourse.

First, he refuted and answered their objections against him, from the first to the 8 verse.

Secondly, he renewed his complaint, which was the ground of all their objections from the 8th verse unto the end of the 13th. [Page 489] Here at verse 14. he begins a charge against his friends of unkind­ness, indiscretion, yea of cruelty in managing of this dispute against him. He giveth it first in general, or by way of Preface, To him that is afflicted, pitty should be shewed from his friend; But he for­saketh the fear of the Almighty; As if he had said; You should have dealt otherwise with me, then you have, in this case; though (blessed be God) I find help within me, God hath given me the light of his spirit and wisdome to discern my own condition, yet it is no thank to you: I have found no help in my friends, you have dealt unfriendly with me; you should have pittied me, but you have opposed me, and so forsaken that duty which the fear of the Almighty teaches. He proceeds to illustrate this more particularly, by way of similitude, comparing his friends to a brook, whose waters fail when we are athirst, or when there is most need of water.

To him that is afflicted.

The word signifies, Him that is melted: and the reason is, be­cause [...] Solvit, dissol­vit, liquidum & fluidum reddidit. Sic mea perpe­tuis liquescant pectora curis, Ovid. de Pont, [...] a Tributum sic dictum, quia paulatim li­quescere facit facultates, ma­ximo si nimi­um imponatur, Buxtorf. b Quidam Pon­tificii▪ volunt suam Missam hac voce he­braica fuisse appellatam. Re­cte quidem, per eam scilicet pie­tas omnis lique­facta est & d [...]s­soluta, Rivet. affliction dissolves the spirit of a man, and (as it were) melts his heart: therefore it is called the fire of affliction; To be dissol­ved or melted, and to be afflicted, are the same. And that effect is ascribed to fear and trouble of spirit, arising from affliction, Psalm 22 15. My heart (saith David, a type of Christ) in the middest of my belly, is like melting wax: By reason of the heat and greatness of his trouble, and the anguish of his spirit, he was as metal melted in a furnace. At the defeat of the Israelites before Ai, it is said, the hearts of the people melted, and became as water, Josh. 7. 5. And in the sixth Psalm, verse 6. David cryes up the exuberance of his sorrowes, by this word: I melted or watered my couch with tears. Thus the Prophet threatning a day of great fear against Jerusalem, tells them, They shall be, as when a Stan­dard-bearer fainteth, Isa. 10. 18. When the Battell waxes hot, and a vanquisht army is running and crying for quarter, the stan­dard bearer is in greatest danger, all make up to him, and then he fainteth, or melteth away with fear. (a) Tributes and taxes, are ex­prest in the Hebrew, by a word coming from this root, because if heavily imposed, they melt away the estates of a people. (b) It is a witty observation, that whereas some of the Papists conceive their word [Masse] was derived from this Hebrew word [Massas] which signifyeth to melt; One of ours answers, let it be so: It [Page 490] suites this sense of the word exactly, and the effect o [...] that abho­minable Idolatry; for the Masse hath dissolved and melted away truth and pitty out of the Popish Territories.

To him that is offlicted, pitty should be shewed. That word pitty, in the Hebrew, signifies a sacred sweet affection of mercy, [...] Pietas, bonitas, benignitas & per Antiphrasin impletas, crude­titas, ex Cal [...]a­icae linguae usu. benignity, goodness and piety: And by Contraries (in which sense words are often used in that language) it notes, First, Re­proach; Prov. 14. 34 Sin is (chesed) a reproach to any people; Secondly, Impiety and cruelty, harshness and severity; Thirdly, It signifies any abhominable wickedness, (Levit. 20. 17.) where Moses speaking of incest, incest between brother and sister, calls that abomination, by this word (Chesod) A wicked thing. That may have a good name, the nature whereof is so ill, that it is not to be named.

Further, The word, as we translate, imports more than a bare act of pitty or commiseration; as suppose a man see his brother in mi­sery, compassionates him, but relieves him not, this is not pity. Such the Apostle James describes, in his first Chapter, vers. 15. If a brother or a sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and you say unto them, be filled, be warmed, be cloathed; poor creatures, ye are hungry, yea are naked, I pitty you, I am sorry to see you thus; be filled, be cloathed; I wish it were otherwise with you; and yet in the mean time he gives them nothing wherewith either to cloath or feed them; Is this fulfilling the law of love? Is this charity? Nothing lesse. The pity here spoken of, is not a verbal piety; Our saying to a brother in trouble, be comforted, or I would, course were taken for you, I wish you well with all my heart, and so we bestow a mouth-ful of good words, but not so much as a morsell of bread, or a cup of cold water. Good words alone are cheap charity to mans expence, and they are so cheap in Gods esteem, that they will not be found of any value at all in the day of recke­ning: good words, not realized, if they be found any where, will be found in the treasures of wrath. This is not the pitty which (Job teacheth us) should be shewed to him that is afflicted: The Apostles quesion shakes such out of all claime to this grace, 1 John. 3. 17. whosoever (saith he) hath this worlds goods, and seeth his bro­ther in need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how doth the love of God dwell in him? Though a mans mouth be open with good words, yet if he shut his bowels from good deeds, there is no love to God or man hous'd in that mans heart. It is [Page 491] no Pitty (to speak of) onely to speak pitty; and therefore the A­postle addes, verse 18 My little children, let us not love in word and in tongue, but in deed and in truth; thats the true meaning of this word, to him that is afflicted, pitty should be shewed; But you (my friends) have not given me so much as the sound of pitty, you have not bemoaned me, much less have you relieved me, which is the substance of pitty, reall pitty: You have not loved me in tongue, giving me good words, much less in deed and in truth. Deed-pitty, is both the duty and the disposition of a godly man: therefore this word (Chasid) in the concrete, is often used in Scrip­ture, to signify a godly man: He is one that hath obtained much grace and pitty from the Lord, and he is kind, gracious and pittiful unto men. The holy Proverb assures us, That a good man is merci­ful, pittiful to his beast, much more to a man, and most of all to a godly man, who is his brother in the nearest bond. And it is considerable how this word was used by way of distinction among the Jewes: who cast their whole people or nation into three ranks, (and it is grounded upon Rom. 5 6, 7. where the Apostle al­ludes to those three sorts.) First, There were (Reshagnim) ungod­lymen, the prophane rabble. Secondly, there were the (Tsa­dikmi) righteous men: And thirdly, there were (Chasidim) good men, or pittiful m [...]n; scarcely (saith the Apostle) will one die for a righteous man, for a man fair and just in his dealings; per­adventure (for one of the Chasidim▪) for a good man, some one may chance to dy; He that had been pittiful, might (haply) find pitty; and having done so much good in his life, all would desire he should live still But herein God commended his love to us, that while we were [...]et sinners (Reshagnim, in the worst ra [...]ke of men) Christ died for us. No man had either love or pitty enough to die for them, who had so much impiety. The farthest that the natural line o [...] mans pitty can reach, is to do good to those who do him good, or are good.

Pitty, notes out such a sort of men, and such a sort of actions, as Antiqui vocant Cicon [...]am, pie­tatis cultricem. Ciconiis pietas eximia est, So [...]. are fullest of love, of bowels of brotherly kindeness, and compas­sion: Hence the Stork, which by divers of the ancients, was put for the Emblem of love and benignity, is exprest in the Hebrew by this word, Levit. 11. 19. The Storke is very tender towards her young ones, and her young ones are as tender of her, when she is old, as naturalists have observed. So then, this word imports the height of all offices and affections of love from man to man, [Page 492] especially from Christian to Christian, in times of trouble, and cases of extremity: This Pitty you should have shewed me, saith Job.

But he forsaketh the fear of the Almighty. That is, he for­sakes all godlinesse, goodness and religion; Fear takes in all thats good; and so it is conceived, that Job retorts the words of Eli­phaz in the fourth chap. Is this thy fear? or where is thy fear, thy Re­ligion? Now Job saith, Is this your fear? You have forsaken the fear of the Almighty. Is this your Religion, to deal so harshly with a distres­sed friend, or to give him such cold comfort? Surely you have forsaken that fear of the Almighty, which you charged me with. Have not I rea­son to ask, Is this thy fear? or to conclude, You have forsaken the fear of the Almighty.

These words are diversly rendred. Some thus, He that takes away pitty from his friend, hath forsaken the fear of the Almighty. And Qui tollit ab [...]mico suo mi­sericordiam, ti­morem Domi­ni derelinquit, Vulg. thats a truth, and a good sense, though not so clear to the letter of the Text.

Mr. Broughton joins this with the former verse, By him whose mercy is molten toward his friend, and who leaveth the fear of the Almighty. So referring this (melting) to mercy, and not to the man; joining it with the former, thus, Have not I my defence, and is judg­ment driven away from me, by him, whose mercy is molten away toward his neighbour, and who leaveth the fear of the Almighty? As if Job had said, Eliphaz doest thou thinke thou haste driven away all wisdome from me by thy dispute? Doest thou think that I have lost my reason, as thou hast lost thy pitty? Thou thinkest wisdome and understanding have forsaken me, but it appears by thy dealings, that thou hast forsaken the fear of God, which is the beginning of wis­dome.

Thirdly, it is rendred in the contrary sense. The word Che­sid) An dissoluto à sodali suo con­vitium, et quod timorem omni­potentis deseru­erit? An hac amicitiae jus? &c. ut nunc ego à vobis au­dio, Merc. being taken for reproach and harsh dealing, and so the mea­ning is made out with a kind of admiration, thus, Should reproaches be cast upon a man that is afflicted from his friend! should he be told that he hath forsaken the fear of the Almighty! and that wisdome is driven from him! Do you think I am not able to discover your dealings? should you go about to reproach me in this condition? should you tell me thus harshly, that I am departed from the fear of God? Is this thinke you a fair carriage towards me: when you saw me melted and afflicted, you should have given me sweet and comfortable words, not reproachfull words?

Job (according to this sence) sound his friends, dealing with him, as the Jews with Christ, to whom being a thirst, they gave vi­negar to drink: Or as David in the type speaks, they gave me gall for my meat, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink; here seems to be a like meaning. You have given me reproaches in stead of comforts, slandered me, instead of refreshing me, and is this the course you should take? As Absalom said to Hushai, 2 Sam. 16. 17. Is this thy kindnesse to thy friend? when he seemed to fall away from David unto him. So Iob might speak to Eliphaz, Is this thy kind­nesle to thy friend, to load him with reproaches, when you see him over-laden with afflictions?

A fourth thus;

Shall he that consumes by the reproaches of his friend, forsake the fear of the Almighty? The meaning whereof is this. Doe Qui tabescit ab amico suo pro­ [...]ro, etiam ti­morem omnipo­tentis retinquet? Foelices soli videntur sapere, miseri desipere. you think that all men whose riches and comforts are lost, have lost their reason and judgement? And doe you think that they who are reproacht by men; doe not fear God? The world com­monly judges none wise, but they that are rich; And that they fear God most, who rejoyce most. But my practise and example (I doubt not) shall consute that opinion, and give all the world to know, that a man consumed and spent by the reproaches of men, and the stroakes of God, may yet fear God and keep up his stock to the full, in holinesse, and in wisdom. Contabescens charitatem non tam dicitur. er­ga guem socij charitas contabescit, quam quū per soci [...] chari­tatem preposter ram (fcilicet) & sine scientia exercitam con­tabescit. Cocc.

Fifthly, This melting is referred, not to the pitty of his friends, but to Job melting or consuming, by that, which they called pity. Thus.

Shall he be charged to have forsaken the fear of the Almighty, who consumes by the charity of his friends? that is, who is more afflicted by the counsels, which his friends (in love) give him, then by all his other afflictions. As the mercies of the wicked are alwayes cruel, (Prov. 12. 10.) So sometime the mercies of the godly are; especially, when they give preposterous and indiscreet counsel; and this interpretation suites well, with the title, which Iob gave his friends, Miserable comforters are ye all. Chap. 16. 2. That is, you have done your good will to comfort me, but God hath not shew­ed you the way, nor given you the tongue of the learned, that yee might know how to minister a word in season to him that is wea­ry; and so notwithstanding all your good intentions, ye have added to my miseries.

A sixth thus, (Hunc) dis­solutum (prae doloribus) ab amico ejus (ex­hibenda) mise­ricordia (dere­liquit) & eundem dissolutum) ti­mor Saddai de­re inquit. Horum duorum versiculorum terminos ita digerimus ut in posteriori, v [...]x, dissolutus sit mascu ini gene­ris, & accusa­tivi casus [...]ega­turque à verbo dere inquit, cu­jus duo nomina­tivi sint mise­ricordia & ti­mor Saddai ille verò dissolut [...]s sit Job loquente de seipso in ter­tia persona. Apparet ex hoc. expl [...]atione? [...]um nominati­vo, ut, in [...] Isa. 31. 1. & Ezr. 1. 5, Coc. Dissoluto à so­cio ejus benigni­tas est sc. im­pendenda alio­qui timorem Omnipotentis deserit. Drus. Vau apud He­braeos varie su­mitur, & in­terdum pro a io­qui. That pity, which friends should shew this man mel­ted [Page 494] with afflictions, hath forsaken him; but hath the fear of the Al­mighty forsaken him also?

The meaning whereof may be made out to this effect. As if Job had said thus. You plainly see, that there is no help in me, for my pains and uncessant troubles, have quite bereaved me of all that strength, upon which I should naturally subsist; And as for you (my friends) that pitty and compassion, which you should afford a man thus melted with sorrows, is quite fled and gone from your hearts and lips. But what then? Is the fear of God departed also from this sorrowful soul? It is confessed, strength is gone from my body, and I see pitty towards me, is gone from your soules. O, how miserable then were I, if I should goe from my God, and for­sake his fear! You shall see, that though the pitty of men hath for­saken me, a melted man, yet (as you object) the fear of God hath not.

A seventh reading, varying from ours only in a word, gives the sence very fair and easie * to him that is afflicted or melted, pit­ty should be shewed by his friend, otherwise he forsakes the fear of the Almighty. Whereas we say, [but he forsaketh] this trans­lation saith [Otherwise he forsaketh] the fear of the Almighty, that is, if a man do not shew pitty to his friend in affliction, that man sheweth that he hath forsaken the fear of the Almighty. Thus as I hinted at the entrance of this passage, Interpreters are much divided about the Grammatical construction of these words; There is a truth in every sence given, and their variety may teach us to adore the fulness of the holy language, which leads our thoughts so many wayes, as also to be humbled for our own blindness of mind, and narrowness of heart, to see or comprehend the mind of God fairly written to us.

But I take the last to be the clearest meaning of Job in this pas­sage, and that, to which most of the former are reducible, and therefore staying upon this sence, I shall give two or three obser­vations from it.

First, It is the common duty of friends, and the speciall duty of godly friends, to pitty and help one another in affliction. I say, to pitty and to help (for that is the compasse of the word) we have not done our duty in pittying the distressed, unless we come to real assisting them. We satisfie not our obligation to the bond and Law of love by giving comfortable words. As that faith, which is a­lone without works, doth not justifie us, so that pitty which is a­lone [Page 495] without works, doth not justifie our faith; such empty pitty will goe for little better then cruelty, and not to help, will be in­terpreted oppression. Word-pitty is but the leafe of love, Deed-pity is the fruit of it. As we should labour to be filled with all the fruits of righteousness, which are by Christ, so with all the fruits of love, of compassion, and of tenderness, for these also are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise of God, Phil. 1. 11. Observe secondly,

That the fear of God is ever joyned with love to our brethren. True religion (that we mean by fear) hath a double bond in it, a bond of obedience to God, and a bond of love to men. The A­postle puts so much of religion in the latter, that in one place he makes it, all religion, the very definition of religion, Jam 1. 17. Pure religion and undefiled before God (what is it?) It is this, to visit the fatherless and the widows in their affliction. This is religion and pure religion, that is, this is a great branch of religi­on, and a special fruit, which springs from that goodly tree, religi­on. To visit the fatherless, is more then to lock upon them, and ask them, how they doe: To visit them is to help them: It is like that visit (in it's proportion) which Christ made into the di­stressed world. He visited and redeemed his people, or he visited his people, to redeem them. And, the fatherlesse, to whose visit religi­on lead us, are not only poor children or Orphans, whose parents are lately dead, and they not able to shift for themselves, but the fatherlesse are all the afflicted, who want our help, or pa­tronage. Every helpless and comfortless soul is as an Orphan without parents, as a widow without a husband, To relieve such is pure religion. In the 1 John. 4. 20. the Apostle makes that an e­verlasting conviction against any man, that he loves not God, if he loves not his brother; If a man say he loveth God, and hateth his brother, (there is no medium in this point, between hating and not loving, or between hating and not helping, it it be in our pow­er) he is a lyar, for he that loveth not his brother, whom he hath seen, how can he love God, whom he hath not seen? Job puts it so here, you should shew pitty to your friend in affliction, but you forsake the fear of the Almighty, and where fear of God is not, the love of God is not. Love to God is visible in love to man. And in affliction, the love of man to man, is made most visible. A true friend can hardly be discovered in prosperity, and a false friend can hardly be hid in adversity. Lastly, observe,

It is not enough, not to be cruel to, or not to grieve the afflicted. We must shew them favour and doe them good. The light of nature condemns the oppressour, and the light of religion condemns them who shew no pity.

JOB Chap. 6. Vers. 15-22.

My brethren have dealt deceitfully as a brooke, and as the stream of brooks they pass away;

Which are blackish by reason of the yce, and wherein the snow is hid.

What time they wax warm, they vanish: when it is hot, they are consum­ed out of their place.

The paths of their way are turned aside; they goe to nothing, and perish.

The troops of Tema looked, the companies of Sheba waited for them.

They were confounded, because they had hoped; they came thither, and were ashamed.

For now yee are nothing; yee see my casting down and are a­fraid.

JOB having in the former verse begun to charge his friends with unkindnesse, proceeds in this Context to illustrate his charge by a similitude; To make their unkindness, yet more notorious and visible, he sets it out by things, which are visible: that so their own eyes or experiences might convince them, as well as his Discourse. The whole similitude is extended from the 15th to the 21th verse. The sum of all is this, That Job had found his friends like those brooks, which hold least water, when there is most need, and great­est enquiry for water; they gave him no comfort, when he was no­thing (to the eye) but sorrow. He was parcht and scorcht in those hot regions and fiery climates of affliction; and they gave him not (to his tast) so much as a drop of water to cool his tongue, to ease his complaints. That in general.

For the better understanding of this elegant similitude, we may observe the parts of it.

We have here

  • 1. The Protasis or proposal.
  • 2. The Exegesis or explication
  • 3. The Apodosis or application

of this similitude

Or more plainly, we have four things considerable in it.

The similitude is

  • 1. Proposed.
  • 2. Explained.
  • 3. Confirmed.
  • 4. Applied.

It is,

  • 1. Proposed, vers. 15. My brethren have dealt deceitfully as a brooke, &c.
  • 2. Explained, vers. 16, 17, 18. Which are blackish by reason of yce, and wherein the snow is hid, what time they wax warm, they vanish, &c:
  • 3. Confirmed vers. 19. 20. The troops of Tema looked, the compa­nies of Sheba waited for them, they were confounded, because they had bope, &c.
  • 4. Applied to them, vers. 21. For now ye are nothing, ye see my ca­sting down, and are afraid.

So much for the parts, now to the opening of the words.

Vers. 15. My brethren have dealt deceitfully as a brook &c.

My bretbren] The word signifies, first a brother of the same bowels (so brother is taken in the strictest sence) a natural brother. [...] Frater, propin­quus, vel qui eadem professio­ne gente, mori­bus vel amicitia frater est. Etiam tribuitur inani­matis, quae simi­litudinem quan­dam invicem; habent: Chem­nit. in Harm. Evang. Veraamicit ia est quaedam fra­ternitas & a­nimorum aequa­litas.

Secondly, a brother of the same bloud, any kinsman.

Thirdly, it signifies any one that is knit to us in affection, or like us in manners and disposition.

Fourthly, it notes all those, who are bounded with us in the same Nation, or associated in the same profession, though scatter­ed all the world over. As in Scripture, that relative word, Father is taken, not onely for a natural Father, but for any Leader, Guide or directour of others in spiritual, or civil respects; so, they who are near one to another in civil or spiritual respects, are called bre­thren, though they be never so far distant in bloud or place.

And it is observable, that this word likewise is attributed to things inanimate, or without life, when they have a similitude or likeness one to another. So Exodus 25. 20. The faces of the Cherubims shall took one to another. The Hebrew is, each man to his brother. And Exodus 26. 3. 5. The curtains of the Taber­nacle, [Page 498] the loops, and (vers. 17.) the Tennous, are all called woman and sister, because they were all to be of the same materials and di­mensions. [...] Frater cognationem habet, cum [...] unus, vel [...] pariter, quoniam qui si­miles sunt, vel in uno conveni­unt, fratres di­cuntur. [...]

Some Criticks observe, that the Hebrew word, for a brother, is of near brother-hood or alliance, with two other words, whereof the first signifies, One, and the other Alike or Together, to shew that brethren ought to be as One, and Alike or Together, which latter is by an elegant Paranomatia, joyned with it Psal. 133. 1. Behold how good and pleasant is it for brethren to dwell together in unity, or as we put in the Margin, To dwell even together.

So then, the very word, whereby brethren are expressed, notes that there ought to be a nearness, a similitude, yea an Onenesse (if I may so speak) between them in their affections and actions. Yet (saith Job) these men, whose relation thus obliges them, have laid themselves out to my greatest disadvantage.

My brethren have dealt deceitfully with me:

The word imports dealing perfidiously or treacherously in any [...] Persidus fuit, perfide egit, vi­olavit sidem, vel foedus. kind, Isa. 21. 3. The treacherous dealer, dealeth treacherously. And it is applyed to that treachery or prefidiousnesse, which is the highest in civil relations, the treachery of the wife to the husband, Jer. 3. 20. Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so you have departed from me; Idolatry is the violation of our faith to Christ, And therefore often called adultery.

This word (to note that by the way) as it signifies to deal per­fidiously, in the Verbe, and perfidiousnesse and treachery, in the Nown; so also a garment or vesture made up of any kind of mat­ter Forte quod ve­stimentum sit primae hominis contra Deum perfidiae tegumē ­tum & testi­monium, cum antea homo nu­dui fuerit, Bux. or stuffe And the reason is thus given by the learned Hebrician, Because a garment is both the cover and the witnesse of mans first perfidiousnesse and treachery against God. Our first parents in innocency had no garment, but innocency: they were without cloa­thing, and wanted no cloathing; they were naked, and did not perceive their nakedness; but assoon as they departed from God treacherously, their sin told them, that is, made them feel that they were naked: therefore they put themselves on Aprons of leaves, but God cloathed them with the skins, and cloathing he vested in a word of that language, which should ever mind man of the rea­son, why cloaths were first put upon him, namely, his perfidi­ous and treacherous dealing with God. That (take it in passage) which now so many make a matter of their pride, is a witnesse of [Page 499] their shame, their shamefull rebellion, and falling away from God.

Put these together, My brethren have dealt deceitfully with me. Job meaneth it of his three visiting friends, these, (if not bethren of his bloud, yet) were of great familiarity and correspondency with him; therefore, he at once titles and reproves them thus, My brethren have dealt deceitfully with me. Hence observe,

First, That there is no obligation so near, but an evil heart will break, through it. My brethren have dealt deceitfully. Though I suppose, Job here charged his brethren too deeply, if so deep as their hearts, who, notwithstanding they failed in the busi­nesse they came about, yet I beleeve, had no intention to wrong or to deceive him: Yet many have been intentionally deceived by brethren; and it is a truth in position, That brethren will de­ceive.

Secondly, whereas he puts such an Emphasis upon it, My bre­thren have dealt deceitfully with me. As if he had said, you are not enemies, you are not strangers that speak these things, but my bre­thren. Note from it.

That, as it is ill for any to deal deceitfully, so worst of all for brethren. It is a trouble to be deceived by any, and a sin, for any to deceive, but it is worse to be deceived by those we trust. And when a brother deceives, the sinne of the deceit is doubled, whe­ther he be a brother in the flesh, or a brother in friendship, or a bro­ther in the profesion of the faith. Deceit from a brother is excee­ding bad in all, but worst of all in the last. Deceit from a brother in the faith is more then double unfaithfulnesse. David com­plains (Psal. 55. 12.) of the wrong he had received from such a brother, It was not an enemy that reproached me, for then I could have born it (the reproach had not been half so heavy or grie­vous unto me, if an enemy had reproached me, the wound had not been half so wounding, if an enemy had smitten me.) But it was thou a man, mine equal, my guide and my acquain­tance, we took sweet counsel together, and we walked to the house of God in company; to be reproached and wronged by thee, this is the thing that lies heavy upon my spirit. God himself complaines most, when they deal perfidiously with him, who are neere him, his own people; He cannot expect any other of Heathens and strangers; but when his children deal de­ceitfully with him, he complaines of this, as much, with admira­tion as with anger. I have nourished and brought up children, [Page 500] and they have rebelled against me, Isa. 1. 2. He calls Heaven and Earth to bear witness of this unfaithfulnesse. Men are wicked beyond all reason (not that there is reason in any wickedness, but so we speak of all excesses) men (I say) are wicked beyond all reason, when God appeals against them, to things without all sence. David satisfyed himself in the evil measure he received from a stranger, because he had received evil from a Sonne; As greater benefits and favours, swollow up the thought of lesser, so do greater afflictions, and unkindnesses. A man hath no leisure to think of his discurtesie, who gives him ill language, when another assaults him to cut his throat: When Shimei railed on David, (2 Sam. 16. 10, 11.) Abishai▪ heats his spirit to revenge; What saith David? My sonne which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life, how much more now may this Benjamite doe it? This stranger, one of another Tribe and Family: As if he had said, I have no reason to be much troubled, to hear a stranger speak hard words against me, when my sonne is up in arms against me; to hear the one curse me, when the other would kill me. Moses uses this argument, to umpire between the two Hebrews, Sirs, ye are brethren, why do ye wrong one to another, Acts 7. 26. It will be a mighty aggravation of sin, when God shall say, My children have dealt deceitfully with me: or man, my bowels, my brethren have dealt deceitfully with me.

My brethren have dealt deceitfully as a brook.

Here is the shadow of their deceit, Job explains himself by a similitude; They have dealt deceitfully, but how? I will tell you how, they have dealt deceitfully, as a brook, and as the streame of a brook they pass away; I can go to the streams, and to the brooks, and shew my friends the face of their hearts (to me I am sure of their dealings with me) in those waters. [...] Significat hae­reditatem, dein­de fluvium, & quoniam torrens plerumque in valle labitur, ac­cipitur aliquan­do provale, Mer

They are as a brook.] The word signifies both a brook and a valley; because brookes usually runne in valleys, therefore one word expresseth both. The same word signifies also to inherit, and an inheritance; Hence some joine all the three sences toge­ther in this one word, A brook, a valley, and an inheritance; because valleys inherit the brooks, which descend to them from the maintains; valleys are the heirs or inheritresses of the streams which issue from the hills, Psa. 104. 10. The holy Ghost describes a spring or a brook, thus, He sendeth springs into the Valleyes, [Page 501] which run among the hills, hills are the original of Rivers, and they runne among the hills; hills send them down as a portion to the valleys.

But the brook here spoken of, is not such a brook, as hath a spring in a hill, mountain or rock; but a brook or torrent, caused by rain, or melted snow; The text cleares that meaning; My friends have dealt deceitfully as a brook; A brook springing from a hill, will not deceive, such a brook being fed with continu­all supplies of water, will give us drink continually; but a brook falling from a hill, failes quickly: such a brook, the next words expresse more clearly, and as the stream of brooks they passe away.

As a stream of brooks. That is, as those torrents and over­flowings [...] Aqua impetuo­sa & violenta quae fluit cum vi & impetu. of brooks; A brook hath a constant channel, and it hath an accidental channel: We see many streames running into a brook in a time of rain, and that brook swolne above its banks, sending out many streames: So that to say, they are like the stream of brooks, is to say, they are like brooks, when they stream forth, or to those streames of brooks, which by waters from the clouds, are sodainly increast; These streams of brooks, usually called Land-flouds, having their spring or fountain in the clouds; which sometimes distill in soft, soaking dewey showers, and often pour out in strong, violent stormy raines, whence these streames (which in the Hebrew, are denominated from their impetuous violent strength) run violently, and spend their strength as quick­ly. That which is violent, cannot be permanent, much lesse perpe­tual. Nullum viol [...]n­tum perpetuum. We have the word, Psal 126. 4. Where the Church prays, Turn again our captivity, O Lord, as the streames in the South; which some render, As the mighty waters in the South. Why Tanquam aquas validissimas, Jun. would they have their captivity turned like those mighty flouds in the south? The reason is this, because the South is a dry country, where there are few springs, scarce a fountain [...]o be found in a whole desart. What then are the waters, they have in the South? in those parched Countries? They are these mighty strong tor­rents, which are caused by the showers of Heaven: So the meaning of that prayer in the Psalm, is, that God would sud­denly turn their captivity. Rivers come suddenly in the South: where no spring appears, nor any sign of a River, yet in an hour the water is up, and the streams overflow. As when Eliah sent his servant toward the Sea (in the time of Ahab) he went [Page 502] and looked, and said, There is nothing. That is, no shew of rain, not the least cloud to be seen, yet presently the heavens grew black and there was a great rain, 1 Kings 18. 44. Thus, let our capti­vity be turned, thus speedily and suddenly, though there be no ap­pearance of salvation, no more than there is of fountain in the sandy desart; or of rain in the clearest heavens, yet bring salvation for us: We use to say of things beyond our supply, have we a spring of them? or can we fetch them out of the clouds? so though no ground appears, whence such Rivers should flow, yet let our salvation be as Rivers in the South, as Rivers fetched out of the clouds, and dropt in an instant immediately from the Hea­vens. Job compares his brethren and friends to those streames of brooks, they came suddenly, but they are quickly down again. The Comparison in the Psalm, is made onely with respect to the sudden appearance of those Rivers; but Job applyeth it, to the sud­den passing away of those Rivers; as the stream of Brooks they pass away. Their coming so suddenly, is a great refreshing, but their sudden departure is as great a disappointment

The word notes two things; First, motion: and secondly, con­sumption. [...] Est praeterire & perire, evanesce­re, quia quae praeterierunt non amplius exi­stunt. In both sences, violent torrents pass away: First, they pass away with a strong motion; and then they pass away with a sudden consumption, they runne so fast, that they run them­selves off their legs, they come to nothing; their motion spends them, whereas the motion of a River doth not. So the word is used, Psal 37. 36 He passed away, and lo, he was not, yea, I sought him, but he could not be found. Those things that passe away, are many times said to loose their being and their use; he passed away, and lo, he was not. So Job meaneth here, these streams passe away, and lo, they are not.

Having thus proposed this similitude, that his friends dealt de­ceitfully as a brock, and shewed what kind of brook he meant, those violent torrents, which pass away: now he gives a further description of those brooks.

Vers. 16. Which are blackish by reason of the ice, and wherein the snow is hid.

The Vulgar Latine puts a strange sense upon this passage, rendring it thus. He who fears the frost, shall be overwhelmed by Qui timet prui­nam irruet su­per eum nix, Vulg. snow. Which seemes to be a proverbial speech, to set torth those, who shifting from one danger or extream, run into another more [Page 503] dangerous, like that of the Prophet Amos, ch. 5. 19. As if a man did flee from a Lion, and a Bear met him; or went into his house, Elegans dictum in socios Iobi, sed minus con­cordat cum E­braica veritate, Drus. * Tinebam pec­cata minima, nunc punior quasi pro magnis sceleribus, Glos. and leaned his hand on a wall, and a Serpent bit him. But as their translation is a corruption of the Text, so their ordinary glosse corrupts their translation. * I feared smallest sins, but now I am puni­shed after the rate of great sins. Whereas indeed Iob was ready to acknowledge, that the least sin he ever committed, deserved a grea­ter punishment, then the greatest pain he felt; and yet never lookt upon any of his pains, as the punishment of his sins. But to pass that.

Take the mind of Job, as pursuing his similitude in more words to this effect. These mighty streames are but for a while, they pass away; or if at any time they continue, it is not from any qua­lity or fitness they have in themselves to continue; but as their coming is extrinsical (not out of the ground, but from the air) so is their continuance: I grant, these great Land-flouds, some­times stay with us a while, not because they have any ordinary natural supply or stay, they are onely blackish by reason of the ice: after a great Rain in winter, a great frost comes, and then your water-courses, or brooks swelling above their channels, are sur­prized by cold, and cannot get away, the cold condenceth the wa­ters, and freezeth them up, and the snow is kept close from mel­ting; then these torrents or streams, seem to be lasting fountains, and treasures of water.

Or take it thus, He compares those friends, who administer no comfort in trouble, to brookes, which in time of rain, when we have no need, overflow with water; but in cold winter weather are lockt up with frosts, or in hot summer-weather, are exhaled and dried up by the Sun. As it follows;

Vers. 17. What time they wax warm, they vanish, when it is hot, they are consumed out of their place.

These streams, you might think, living, lasting streams, or stan­ding, fixed waters, when you saw them frozen into great moun­tains of ice and snow compact together: but stay a while, and you shall see what becomes of them; at the next thaw, they are con­sumed out of their place, Such friends have I, and such is the friend­ship of mankind, unless God renew the heart, or restrain it, from its natural baseness. [...] Diffluere, dif­fundi, Buxt.

The word which we translate to wax warm, is used but this [Page 504] once in Scripture: it signifies also, scattered or dissipated. And the reason is, because heat or warmth, dissipates and separates those Dissipati. Vulg. things which were united or congealed. The Sun warms the streams, and then the waters, which stood on a heap, scatter and disperse. The sum of all is: These streams in winter have nothing to stay their consuming, but their hardning; and as soon as heat comes, they dissolve, and are gone, in Summer these brooks are dry.

This is yet further illustrated in the 18. verse.

The pathes of their way are turned aside, they go to nothing and perish.

What he had said before in those words, They vanish and are consumed out of their place, he saith again in these, The paths of their way are turned aside, they goe to nothing and perish; That is, these streams are, as if they had never been, you cannot find them in their former channels; these waters are quite spent, the Sunne at a few draughts, empties these vessels, and drawes them dry; so that there is not a drop lest, either for man or beast.

The word which we render, Turned aside, signifies, To gather [...] Inclinavit per­celluit. up a contract into a narrow compass, as when a man of courage, gathers or shrinks up himself, or, as we say, buckles to a businesse, that he may put out the uttermost of his strength. S [...] Judg. 16. 29. When Sampson came to the pillars, on which the house stood, the text saith, He turned himself with all his might; (It is the word of the text) as if Sampson would collect all the power he had into one place, to pull the pillars out of theirs. He that would do a great service, will have all his outward strength about him, or near at hand. And at such a time, a man will have all his inward strength close together, and therefore puts his body into less room, if he can that all his members may act as one. We shrink up the body al­so in sudden fear. The word is so used, Ruth 3. 8. When Boaz, that good man, awakning, found Ruth at his feet, and perceived there was a woman on the floor, he gathered or shrunk up himself, as a man that is afraid in his bed, will gather up his limbs neerer to­gether, and lies in lesse room. In such a manner, the heat gathers or shrinks up the waters.

Thus the paths of these waters (saith Job) are shrunk up or ga­thered together, as it were, into one channel, or they creep under the banks, to shelter themselves from that great Drinker and [Page 505] river-drier the Sun, but all their subterfuges are in vain; the Sun dries up all, nothing remains; so it follows in the next words.

They goe to nothing and perish.

It is the word used, Gen. 1. 2. The earth was without form and void; [...] Vacuitas, There was a nothingness upon that confused heap before a second creation stampt a form upon it, that which is uselesse, is but as good as nothing. The Jews expresse an Idol by this word, 1 Sam. 12. 21. which suits excellently with that of the Apostle, 1 Cor. 8. An Idol is nothing in the world. So these streams, these rivers which seemed such goodly pleasant streames, such as might have relieved the thirsty traveller at all seasons, come to them in summer, they are gone to nothing, that are like that rude masse, when the world lay undigested into parts, void and without form.

Before I come to the general Observations from the whole similitude, observe, from this description of passing streames, That,

Things or persons cannot hold long, which are not supplied from aninward principle. Job describes streames, having no spring to maintaine them, the rain filled them, the cold froze them, and the warmth of the Sun emptied them. As it is in things, so in persons, no man can hold out either in gracious and spiritual, or just and ho­nourable civil acts, unlesse he have a principle within, answerable to Metapbora in­signis & Hie­roglyphicum clarissime ex­primens, vani­tatem magnae speciei pietati [...] & charitatis quae non ex ve­ra fide prove­nit, Coc. what he undertakes. (Iob. 27. 10.) Will the hypocrite alwayes call u­on God? Not alwayes, why? because he hath not a spirit (or spring) of prayer; Therefore hypocrites are well compared to such brooks, as Job here describes. A failing brook, is a clear Emblem of a false heart, both to God and man.

And that is the reason why regeneration is set forth by the gift of a new principle; of a new heart, or of a new nature. It is to no purpose to work a man by some extrinsical motive, by hopes, or by feares, by threatnings or by promises, by rewards or pu­nishments, to doe, or forbear good or evil: unlesse he have a new heart, all vanishes and comes to nothing. A regenerate person, hath a new heart, a new spirit, is a new creature, a new man; all which notes, a lasting principle, an everlasting frame of holinesse in the main, though it may sometime decline and need repaires. It is farre better to be a rivolet, a little spring, then to be a great torrent; It is better to have a little spring of grace, than a great [Page 506] loud stream of profession. It is reported by Geographers, in their descriptions of America, that in Peru, there is a river called the Diurnall river, or the day river, because it falls with a mighty current in the day, but in the night is dry. This may seem to be a fabulous report, but the reason given (which is direct to the point in hand) makes it not onely probable, but very plain; For they tell us, that this river is not feed by a fountain or a spring, but is caused merely by the melting of the snow, which lies on the mountains thereabouts: in the day time, when the sun is up and warme, the snow melts, but when night comes, and the Sun goes down, the snow freezes, and so the channel dries. Thus it is with those, who have not an inward principle of holinesse, they may have a great floud of profession, when the snow melts down into their bosomes, by the shine of outward prosperity; but when night, and cold, when troubles & dangers come, their waters freeze up, or passe away, and goe to nothing. So much of the causes, why these streams, these water brooks vanish, they have no spring to maintain and feed them: Raine, and frost, and snow (uncertain all) are all they have to trust to.

Job having thus explained his similitude, and shewed, what he means by brooks, and what kind of brooks he means. He now confirms all by an experiment, You shall see it is thus, these brooks will yield nothing at a time of need, Many have tryed them; who are they? The troops of Tema looked, the companies of Sheba waited for them.

The troops of Tema. That is, the travellers who came in great [...] Semita, semi­tae Thema ce­tus hominum sive turmae vi­atorum. companies from Tema, and passed through those desert Countries, where they had observed in the winter, streams and flouds of wa­ter frozen, and full of snow; now in their summer travails, being parcht with heat, and distressed for want of water, they expected reliefe from those brooks, which they had markt out for them­selves, and of which they had, said, These will be watering Hos torrentes designaverunt sive pro statio­ne ad refocil a­tionem, Coc. places for us, and refreshings in extreamest heat. We read often in the old Testament of such travellers, Gen. 37. 25. Behold a com­pany of Ishmaelites, came from Gilead, with their camels bearing spicery, and balme, and myrrhe, going down into Egypt. Such are now called, a Caravan. The letter of the Hebrews is, The paths of Tema; the path or road, in which they travelled, is put for the tra­vellers. Itinera, ho­mines inter se facientes. So Isa. 21. 13. O ye travelling companies of Dedanim; the Hebrew is, O ye paths of Dedanim, that is, O ye who travel [Page 507] in the paths of Dedanim: Thus here, The wayes of Tema, or the Troops of Tema; and the companies of Sheba, waited and looked in these places for water, and (as it followeth) they found none.

The troops of Tema looked. Why did they look? why did they wait for those streams? They had seen plenty of water there, and therefore being thirsty they looked and waited for water. Note hence; first,

That the sense of want carries us out to look for a remedy. The troops of Tema looked; After what? after the streames of brooks; why? because they were parched with thirst. They that are thirsty, will be looking for a stream, for a river; they that are hungry, will be enquiring after bread. As it is in natural, so in spiritual things; when once the soul is parched and thirsty, oh how it [...]ongs for the rivers of mercy, for the streams of conso­lation! it looks and waites for them t [...]o. As the hart panteth af­ter the water brooks so panteth my soul [...]fter thee O God, my soul thirsteth for God, for the living God, Psalm. 2. 1, 2. That's the reason, why Job instances in Tema and Sheba, because they were o [...]ten distressed in their travel for want of Water. Secondly ob­serve,

That probability of speeding, is ground enough for seeking and en­deavouring. Th [...]s [...] Troops of Tema looked, and as they looked they searched for waters; they waited, because it was probable that they should find water, where they had observed water. As (Mat 21. 19▪) Christ himself when he was an hungry, saw a figg-tree afar off (saith the text) having leaves upon it; A figg-tree having leaves, in probability had fruit also: because the figg-tree (as Naturalists observe) p [...]ts forth her fruit assoon as her leaf; therefore when Christ saw leaves upon the figg-tree, it was an argument that there was fruit too; And whereas Mark saith, For the time of figgs was not yet, he meanes the time of in-gathering figgs: So that, the Tree having leaves, shewed it night have fruit growing, and the time of gathering figgs not being past, both these were ground enough for the Lord Christ to go and seek fruit upon it: For in this he acted according to rule of humane reason, not of Divine omniscience. Ma­ny object against seeking God, and humbling themselves be­fore him; It is a thing doubt full, whether ever they shall speed, whether ever they shall finde, or no; they know not whe­ther [Page 508] God will be merciful unto them or no; He will be merciful to some (they know) but whether they be the men, is very doubt­ful. I may answer such from the point, A probability of spee­ding, is ground enough for seeking. If Christ sought for fruit when he saw leaves, beeause it was a thing probable to find it; and if these of Tema and Sheba would seek for water, because they had observed water in those places; surely then, there is ground enough of seeking unto God for mercy, though we suppose there is but a probability of having mercy. The Prophet perswades that afflicted people, to fast and humble themselves, upon this ground, Who knoweth if he will return and repent (loel 2.) that is, it is very proba­ble he will return and repent. Heathen Niniveh, is carried by the same argument, Jona 39. Who can tell if God will return, &c. No man is sure he will not, and though we are not sure he will, yet let us venture. A peradventure from God, is better then a promise; or an assurance from the creature. And if probability be ground enough, what ground is there in assurance and certainty? and that is the ground we have of seeking God; if we seek to him, and wait upon him in faith, we shall be sure to find, Psalm 9. 18. The expe­ctation of the poor shall not perish, The companies of Tema found no water, but God is a living Fountain, whose waters fail not, his banks are alike filled, summer and winter; Christ is not a wa­ter brook, but a spring of waters: We shall never misse water of life, if we seek to, and wait upon him for it: And if we believe on him, out of our bellies shall flow rivers of living waters, Joh. 7. 38.

We have seen the endeavour of these troops of Tema, Now see how they speed.

Vers. 20. They were confounded, because they had hoped; they came thither and were ashamed.

The sum is this, they hoped to have found water there, and it grieved and repented them, that ever they had hope to find water there, because there was none to be found.

They were confounded.

The word signifies indifferently to be ashamed or to be confoun­ded, [...] Puduit rei vel facti. and to be confounded in regard of events, or actions. The word is very neer in sound to our English Abashed; It notes also a wax­ing pale and wan, when the colour failes and withers, comes and [Page 509] goes. If a man be failed much in what he much hoped, his counte­nance fails too, his visage changes, as his thoughts change, and he waxeth pale: Therefore we translate it well, confounded. And it is expressed by confounding; for two reasons.

First, because the complexion is confounded at such a time, shame and blushing make a kinde of confusion upon nature.

Secondly, the Spirits are confounded, the heart is troubled; Disappointments of our hope perplex a man, both within and without. He is disordered quite through. And because long de­laies cause shame, therefore by a Metonymie of the cause for the effect, this word signifies to delay time (Exod. 32. 1.) And when the people saw that Moses delayed to come down, &c. that is, when Ainsworth on Exod. the people saw, that Moses made them ashamed, by his long delay, they gathered themselves together, &c. They waited for Moses 40. daies, and now Moses had staied so long, that they were asha­med of his stay, that is, they expected, but he came not, as they expected, this troubled them. We read the word in the same sence (Judg. 5. 28.) The mother of Sisera looked out at a window, and cried through the latice, why is his chariot so long in comming? Why tarry the wheels of his chariots? Why is his chariot ashamed? that is, why doth his chariot stay so long, as to make us ashamed of our stay? We have long looked what trophies Sisera would bring home, why doth his chariot by delayes make us ashamed? Thus in the text, these travellers are said to be confounded, because they had great hope to find water, but were disappointed, They were confounded; because they had hoped, the latter clause carries [...] Fodit, effodit-per Metaphoram traductam a fo­dientibus, eru­buit, Nam qui rubore perfus [...] sunt ex pecca­to, ca [...]ut in ter­ram dimittunt, instar eorum qui terram de­fodiunt. Cart [...] the same sence, They came thither and were ashamed.

Yet there is a special elegancy in the word, ashamed; which signifies to digge; to digge that we may hide a thing: At it is said of the evil servant, who received but one talent, that he went and digged, and hid his Lords mony, Mat. 25. 18. And so by a Meta­phor this word is translated to signifie being ashamed, because a man that is ashamed, would hide his head in a hole (as we say) if he could, he would runne his head into the ground, and rather be at the pains to digge a hole in the earth, to hide himself, then to endure the shame of shewing himselfe. No man loves that should appear, or to appeare in that, which is his shame.

These two things, to be ashamed and confounded are often ow­ned by the Saints in their repentance. It is best not to doe any thing whereof to be ashamed, but when we have done evil, i [...] is good to be ashamed. To hide our sinnes for shame, and not to be ashamed of them, when they are not hid, are equall aggravations of sinne. Hence when the holy Ghost would set [...]orth m [...]n impu­dent or shameless in sinning, who sinned and cared not, who saw them, he saith (Jer. 2. 34.) Also upon thy skirts is found the blood of innocents, I have not found i [...] by secret search, so we translate it; the Hebrew is, I have not found it by digging; As if he had said, some men are so ashamed of their sins, that when God comes to finde them out, he must dig for them, because they have digged into the earth, as it were, to hide their sins; but others are so impudent in sinning, that God needs not digg to finde out their sins, they are so shameless, that they let their sinnes lie above ground, or as the Prophet speaks (Isa. 3. 9.) They declare their sinnes like Sodome, that is, openly. Truth and holiness never seek corners, and sometimes sinne and wickedness do not. And as the doing of evill forbidden, causeth or should cause shame; so doth the not receiving of good expected; Hence when the Lord would assure his people, that they should undoubtedly receive all the good he had promised, and which they on that ground could expect, he concludes with them, thus, And my people shall never be ashamed. Why? The reason is plain in the Text, Ye shall ea [...] in plenty and be satisfyed, Joel 2 26. which is directly opposite to this in Job. The Temanites were ashamed, because being thirsty, they were not satisfyed. And because Jesus Christ shall so aboundantly satisfy all the hunger and thirst, and supply all [...]h [...] wants and weak­nesses of every believing soul, therefore it is exprest under this word and notion, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed, Rom. 9. 33.

Such a meaning the word bears in this text, [They were asha­med] Foderunt pute­es, sc. ad aquam inveniendam. That is, when they saw there was no water to be had, they would have hid themselves in the earth, or digged holes, to hide themselves in, for grief and shame.

And some render this word here (though to another sence,) They digged. That is, when they saw that there was no water in the streames, then they fell a digging to see; if they could finde any springs. Thats a good sense. But rather take digging as before. To shew what shame would have us do, when we have [Page 511] done amisse, or when we Misse what we would find, then we seek covert and hide our selves. Hence these two are often joyned in Scripture, Shame and hiding, with the disappointment of hope. Reade a text of near compliance with this in the letter (Jer. 14. 3.) Their Nobles have sent their little ones to the waters, they came to the pits and found no water (it was in a time of drought) they returned with their vessels empty; What followeth? they were a­shamed and confounded and covered their heads. Again, verse. 4. Because the ground is chapt, for there was no raine in the earth, the plow-men were ashamed, they covered their heads. And Joel. 1. 10. 11. The corn is wasted, the new wine is dried up; What followeth? Be ashamed O ye husband-men; howle O ye Vinedressers, because the harvest of the field is perished. So that in the common lan­guage and current of the Scripture, shame is an effect of disappoint­ment, and hiding the face, or covering the head an effect of both. Observe hence,

First, That deceived hopes trouble us as much, if not more than present wants.

A present want is a present smart; but deceived hopes are a per­petual smart; And that's the reason why the burthen of sorrow is so heavy, and the drought of the damned (who, as Dives in the Parable, shall never have a drop of water) so intollerable. They (to allude to the text) hoped to come to the over flowing streams of their former earthly delights; But alas, the paths of the way of those brooks are turned aside for ever, they are gone to nothing and perished. All the while they travel (and that will be an eternity) through that howling wildernesse and fiery desert, they shall not meet with one rivolet, nor tast one drop of comfort to cool their parch­ed tongues, or refresh their inflamed bowels. Hopes delayed trouble, but hopes deceived, confound.

Secondly, observe from this passage,

That deceived hopes fill with shame. Deceived hopes make a man hide his head.

Shame arises two wayes, either from doing a thing against com­mon principles. Or from loosing a thing against common expecta­tion. The Lord threatens the idolatrous Israelites, That they shall be ashamed of the Oaks, which they have desired and confounded for the gardens which they had chosen, Isa. 1. 29. Why ashamed of Oakes and gardens? because in gardens, and under shadie Oaks, they set up and worshipped Idols, in which they trusted for deliverance and [Page 512] protection; therefore when destruction should over take them, they must needs be ashamed of Oakes and gardens, because their hopes were so fowlly deceived by them. In the same sence the Lord sore­tels them by the same Prophet, that they shall be ashamed of Ethio­pia, their expectation, and of Egypt their glory, Chap. 20. 5. because they had hoped for so much help, from confederacies with these Nations, who in the issue would delude their hopes, and give them no help at all. Thus also he speaks historically, Chap. 30, 5. They were all ashamed of a people that could not profit them, nor be a help. All they who hope in any thing, save the Lord, shall (as these troops of Tema) be ashamed, because they have hoped, for they shall be de­ceived of their hopes.

And this is the reason, why hypocrites at the last day, when Christ comes to judge them, shall be filled with shame. The rea­son (I say) is, because they have been so full of deluding hopes. It appears they had great hopes, because they speak great words, and make great boasts. They presume if any are to be saved, they are the men; They shew fair for heaven, Mat. 7. 22. Many shall say unto me in that day, Lord, Lord have we not prophecyed in thy Name? And in thy Name cast out devils, &c. They shall say, Lord we have done thus and thus; what doth this repetition of their great works intimate, but the greatnesse of their hopes? Now when Christ shall say, I know you not, How will shame co­ver their faces for ever; And how will they cover their faces for shame, wishing they might never be either seen or known. When Jacob had served a full apprentiship in order to his marriage with beautiful Rachel, and at last, through the guile of Laban was put off with blear-eyed Leah; the holy Ghost expresseth him in a kind of passionate amazement, And it came to passe, that in the morn­ing, behold it was Leah. And he said unto Laban, what is this thou hast done unto me? As if Jacob had been in such a distracti­on, that he could not tell how to expresse himself: And therefore saith, What is this thou hast done unto me? I know not by what name to call such a usage or disappointment as this. O, in what a case will they be at the last day, who have served out (as it were) an apprentiship in hopes of Rachel, the beauty of heaven and sal­vation: And yet when they awake at the resurrection, Behold it will be (infinitely worse than Leah) Hell and Damnation; How will shame and confusion of face, take hold of such for e­ver?

So much for the Letter of this similitude; The failing of those streames, exemplified in the sad experiences of the troops of Tema and the companies of Sheba, as often deceived and ashamed, as they came to them for water.

Now follows the application of the similitude; as if Job had said, I have spoken in the clouds, and told you stories of forraign con­cernment. I tell you friends, I must even apply all this to you, and leave it at your doors. As Nathan, when he had told David, the Parable of the poor man and his little ew-lamb, which his rich neighbor took away to dress for the way-saringman, that was come unto him; He (I say) brings it home to David in the close, say­ing, Thou art the man. So after Job had told a story in the general or in a third person, about deceitfull brooks, and travellers decei­ved by them, now he applies it to his friends, Ye my friends are the men I mean by these brooks. Ye are they I have all this while delineated and set forth by these unfaithful and unconstant streams of water.

Ver. 21. For now ye are nothing, ye see my casting down, and are afraid.

For now ye are nothing.] What, nothing? Ye are nothing at [...] Fuistis non, Estis mihi ni­hili & vanis­simi ut torien­tes descripti. Merc. Ex nihilo nihil fit: Ex quo ni­hil fit nihil est. all unto me: Ye are no more to me in any way of refreshing, then those streames of the brook, which I even now described, were to the troops of Tema, for now ye are nothing. As out of nothing comes nothing, so that is as nothing unto us, out of which nothing comes.

If we render it word for word according to the Hebrew, it is, Ye were not; ye are unto me, as if you had never been, or ye have deceived me, in what I took you to be; I hoped for flouds of com­fort, for rivers of joy and streams of consolation from you, but now I cannot find a drop, Ye are not unto me. That man is, indeed, who doth that, for which he is, or that, which is expected.

The Chaldee translates, Ye have been, as if ye were not. And there is a difference in the Hebrew word, for some read it with Vos suistis, qua­si non essetis. Chald. [...] pro [...] & est idem quod [...] In textu He­braeo scribitur [...] sed in Margin notatur legendum esse [...] ei q. d. fui­stis ei similes, sc. Torrenti. Drus. the Pronoun, Them; most with the Adverb, Not; But though the translation differ, yet it comes to the same sense, ye are them, that is, like to them, like to those streames, or ye are not; that is, ye are nothing to me. As those streams were nothing, or were not, to the Travellers. The phrase, ye are not, imports the de­ceivableness of those men; Iob thought they would be something [Page 514] to him, yea he thought they would be very much to him, even as much as water-brooks to a thirsty man; but they proved nothing at all to him. For as the word [Yea] in Scripture notes assurance, constancy, fidelity and faithfulness; so the word [Not or Nay] both in the Hebrew and in the Greek, signifies unconstancy and unsettleness, especially, when these two are joined together. And so it hath a clear sense, with that (2 Cor. 1. 20.) where the Apo­stle speaking of Christ, and of his faithfulness, saith, The Son of Qui respondet expectationi etiam dicitur, Etiam & non, qui varius & inconstans. God was not yea and nay, but in him was yea; That is, he was not various, inconstant and uncertain, but he was the very same; look what you have found Christ at one time, you shall find him a second and a third time, yea, the same for ever. He will not start from you an inch: So vers. 17. of the same Chapter; When I was min­ded to come, did I use lightnesse? Or the things that I purpose, do I purpose after the flesh, that with me there should be yea, yea, and nay, nay? That is, that with me there should be I and No, something and nothing. It is of a near importance with the words of Job, Ye are no to me; you promised to be, I, to me, to be yea, yea, bu now it comes to the tryal, ye are No, No to me, that is, ye are nothing to me, ye are no such thing, as I expected you would be.

For ye see my casting down, and are afraid

Ye see my casting down] That is, my affliction; To be cast down, [...] Dejectus, Me­taphorice terri­tus fuit, mente jacuic. and to be afflicted are the same. The word signifies dejection, and consternation of spirit, to be heart-fallen; the falling of a mans mind, as well as of his estate, Deut. 1. 21. Fear not, neither be discou­raged, let not your spirit or courage fall. Jobs casting down was in his body and goods, his spirit and courage stood upright upon their feet; Ye (saith Job) see my outward casting down, the casting down of my estate abroad, ye see how all is broken and lost; and now what is the help ye give me? Do ye stand to me, or lift me up, now I am thus cast down? Do ye supply me with com­fort? and prop me up with counsell? no, ye are afraid your selves; ye are so far from removing my trouble, that you your selves are troubled.

Ye are afraid] Their fear may be referred to his person, or to his condition, ye are afraid to come nigh me, ye are afraid I will infect you: or ye are afraid, some such evil will fall upon your selves, I thought ye had come as friends to deliver me from my fears, and [Page 515] now ye are fallen into fears your selves: Thus, Ye are not; ye are no such thing as ye promised me, ye promised to comfort, at least Vos me visistis nulla miserecor­dia moti. Sept. to pitty me, but ye doe not. So the Septuagint, Ye visit me, but ye are not moved with any compassion towards me. I had been as well without your companion. Or, if no such men had ever been in the world.

Observe first, from these words, For now ye are nothing.

He that is not, what he ought to be, or what he promised to be is nothing. To be uselesse is (in a sence) to be essence-lesse. To be uselesse in the world, is to be, as out of the world; A man who lives onely to eat, and drinke, and sleep, may be said not to live at all. What we say in our English proverbe, is true, both of per­sons and of actions, As good never a white, as never the better; as good not to be, as doe no good. The Apostle Judge speaking of unprofitable persons (ver. 12,) cals them Trees without fruit; And what then? Twice dead, plucked up by the roots; As if the A­postle had said, I look upon fruitlesse persons, as dead persons, yea as doubly dead, that is, dead sure enough. As a man can be borne but once, in one kind (Nicodemus argued from a truth, though not to a truth, because he could not destinguish naturall from Spiritual, John. 3, 4.) So a man can die but once, in one kind. These men of whom the Apostle speaks, were alive naturally, though dead spiritually, how then is it said, that they were twice dead? They were judged twice-dead, either, because a spiritual death is so great a death, that it may well goe for two, yea one spiritual death, is worse then a thousand natutal deaths

Or secondly, they are said to be twice-dead, because they were dead, both in regard of the truth of grace, and in regard of any outward actings of grace; For some hypocrites, who are indeed dead in sinne, yet act grace in many outward fruits, as if they were alive. But of these persons it is said, their fruit withereth, and they are without fruit. They were not so much as externally a­ctive; they had no life of union with Christ, and they did no good, with the life of their profession in Christ, and therefore are justly said to be twice-dead. They who have leaves and look fresh and lively, as if they hade more then one life in them, yet, if Ʋse­lesse, are called liveless, and they who doe nothing in the world, are to be reckoned no-bodies in the world. In the Parable of the Prodi­gall, the conclusion is, This my son was dead, and is alive; Why dead? Because he was unanswerable to those purposes, to those [Page 516] ends for which he received life. He was a prodigal, and had de­serted his fathers service, therefore his father looked upon him, as if (all that while) he had not been, at all. That's the description of the dead, as Jacob said of Joseph (when he concluded him torne by a wilde beast) Joseph is not; and Rachel would not be com­forted for her children, because they were not; so saith the Father of the Prodigal, This my son was dead, or he was not; he was no help nor comfort to me. We no longer deserve the name or reputation of Any thing, then we do those things for which we are. If we leave our duty (upon the matter) we loose our na­ture, and are as if we had no being, while we reach not (at least while we reach not after) the end of our being. A Heathen con­cludes of such a man, He hath onely been, he hath not lived. But Fuit, non vixit. we may from the warrant of Jobes Rhetorick, go a degree further, and deny that he hath been, For he is, as if he had never bin, a meer nothing.

From those words [Ye see my casting down, and are afraid.] Note.

That some man is able to bear more than another is able to be­hold. The sight of fearful things causeth fear. Further observe from it,

A fearful man will never be a helpful man.

Courage in a day of trouble, either of our own or others, is a great cure of trouble, yea a victory over it. There is one fear very good, when we see the casting down of our friends; To be afraid of provoking God, to cast us down (Deut. 17. 13.) they shall hear and fear, and do no more presumtuously; What shall they hear? They shall hear how God hath cast men down, or cast down a Nation by his judgements, they shall hear of this and fear. How shall they fear? they shall fear to doe presumtuously, fear to provoke that God, who can thus cast down men and Kingdoms: It is good to be thus afraid, but there is a sinful fear, when fear disorders or un­fits us to put our hands to the help of those, who are cast down, and to administer comfort to those, who are in sorrow; such was the casting down, and the fear here meant; They were so afraid that they could not lend Job a hand, or give him advised counsel to support his spirit.

I shall adde one Observation from the general scope of the simi­litude.

That an unfaithfull friend failes us most, when we have most [Page 517] need of him. That is the summe of all. In winter, when there is water in every ditch, those brooks abound with water, but in the summer, especially in a dry summer, when the rain of the land is dust (as Moses speaks,) these brooks are dust too, they vanish and are consumed out of their place, they afford no refresh­ing at all. When the man, that went down from Hierusalem to Jericho, and fell among theeves (Luke. 10 30.) lay in the way, stript and wounded, even half dead, A certain Priest came that way (saith the text,) and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side; and likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side; but the Samaritan went to him (not from him) and had compassion on him. Job speaks ve­ry neer this language, but fully this sence, of his friend. They, like the uncharitable Priest and Levite, passed by him, as the streams of brooks, they pass away. Whereas they should have been like the good Samaritan, a fountain, a river of settled springing comfort to him.

This is the great difference between the love of God, and that of most men, God is the best friend to us at all times (he is best to us in the best times, if we had not him to friend, it would be very ill with us when we have most friends) But God is best of all to us in the worst times; a best friend to us when we have no friends: he is our spring, when the rain falls, but he is our surest, sweetest spring, when there is neither rain nor dew upon the face of the earth. Therefore he is compared (as Jer. 2. so in other places) unto a living fountain, where you may be sure to find water in the hottest season. This infinitely commends the love of God, beyond that of men, who at the best, are but broken cisterns, which leak out the comforts they are trusted with, and for the most part, are but like Jobs brookes, they turn aside and passe away, when we have most need of them.

It is observed of the Samaritans in Josephus, that when ever the Jews affairs prosper'd, they would be their friends, and professe much kindnesse, but if the Jews were in trouble, and wanted their assistance, then they got them far enough off, they would not have to do with them, or own them. The rich man hath many friends (saith Solomon, Prov. 14. 20.) but the poor is hated even of his own neighbour. Ʋbi deficit pe­cunia, labascit & amicitia. Worldly friendship ends with riches, and he that wants mony seldom a­bounds with friends.

But consider how farre this is from the very nature of a brother, [Page 418] and from the law of friendship. Solomon (Prov. 17. 17.) de­scribes a true friend, to be one who loveth at all times, and a bro­ther is born for adversity. As if he had said, this is the reason God hath raised up relations, and made men neer one to another, because himself orders there shall be times of adversity, when they shall have need of one another; Some render the place, A brother is born in adversity, as if the meaning were, That, when a man is in trouble, God raises up a brother to help him, Or as the Septuagint hath it, A brother is born, for this end and pur­pose, to help in adversity. Therefore a brother loses the very end and purpose why he was born, if he refuse to help those, who are in adversity. Ruth was a true pattern of a faithful friend and bro­ther, though a daughter; I went out full (saith her mother in law) but the Lord hath brought me home empty; But though she was emptied of the world, yet Ruths heart was full of loue to her, I will not leave thee; God do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me. So saith faithfulness in friends, especially in Christian friends; It is one of the greatest duties and commen­dations of Christian profession, to stick to, and stand by one ano­ther; be it fowl weather, or be it fair, blow the winds high or low, let it be stormy or calme, ever to be the same. The Heathens won­dered in the primitive times, at the great love of the Christians to one another. Let us take heed we do not put Heathens, naturall, carnal men to wonder, O how little do Christians love one another! Let us not give them occasion to say, O how the Christians hate one another! how like are they at best to streames of brooks, who fail when their friends and brethren need the benefit of their as­sistance.

Let me only give you this caution, God suffereth men to be thus unfaithful unto men, yea sometimes a Christian brother to Talia patitur Deus suis acci­dere, ne homi­nibus nimis fi­dunt, sed omne solatium, spem & fiduciam in ipso solo vivo & vero Deo, ponant. Lavat. fail a Christian brother (which is their sin, and ought to be their sorrow;) I say, God leaves them to this evil of their own hearts, that we may have a greater good out of it, then, the highest actings of their love and faithfulnesse, could estate us in: Namely, that we may learn to trust upon God alone, and may better know what creatures are, Trust not in a brother (Jer. 9, 4.) so, as to let out your hearts upon him: think not you are safe in the love of a brother, no, not of a godly brother: The Apostle (1 Tim. 6, 17.) to draw off rich men from trusting in their riches, useth this argu­ment, Charge them that are rich, that they trust not in uncer­tain [Page 519] riches, but in the living God: Why should they not trust in riches? He giveth the reason in the Epithite, uncertain; They are uncertain riches, therefore trust them not. So we may say of men, trust not in men, no, not absolutely, in godly men, for the best of men are uncertain, possibly they may be as these streames of brooks, whose waters failed. Psal. 146. 3. Put not your trust in Princes, nor in the son of man in whom there is no help; why not? For his breath goeth forth (that's one reason, he must die, he must re­turn to the earth) therefore trust him not. But besides that, we may say, trust not in Princes, &c. while their breath tarrieth in them, for it is possible their help and faithfulness may goe forth, though their breath doth not. Therefore trust [...]e [...]ly in the living God, he will never leave us, though men doe; God only is unchangeable, he only hath preserved this honour without touch or stain, never to forsake those who trusted him, how forlorn and forsaken soever their condition was.

JOB Chap. 6. Vers. 22, 23, 24, 25.

Did I say, bring unto me? or give a reward for me of your sub­stance?

Or deliver me from the Enemies hand, or redeem me from the hand of the mighty?

Teach me and I will hold my tongue? and cause me to understand where­in I have erred.

How forcible are right words? but what doth your arguing reprove?

JOB Having shadowed out his friends unfaithfulnesse, by an elegant similitude in the context fore-going; now aggravates their unfaithfulness to him, in his wants, by his own modesty, in seeking to them, for supplies. Did I say, bring unto me? or give a revvard for me of your substance? As if he had said, I have not been burthensome or troublesome to you, I have not called for your contributions and benevolences, or sought to have my estate made up out of your purses. Why do ye charge me with impa­tience at my loss, as if that were it which pinches and presses me? did I ever charge you for my reparation, or redemption; That (in deed) might have been, either burdensome or dangerous to you; [Page 520] All that I expected from you, was your comfort, and your coun­sell; these would not have put you to much expence; or if you could not have reacht so far as to comfort me, yet you might have forborn to contribute so largely to my sorrows, by overtaxing me with impatience, and charging me with hypocrisie.

Did I say] I was not clamorous or importunate, no, I did not so much as open my mouth to move you in that point, I have been so far from begging, that ye have not heard me, saying, bring to me.

Bring unto me?] The word is, Give unto me, Hos. 4. 18. Their Princes love, Give ye, or bring ye, so saith Job, I did not say bring ye, or give ye, my spirit was not set upon money, or the repair of my losses out of your estates; I did not either write or send for your charity; you were not invited to visit me, that you might contribute to my necessity. [...] Proprie munus quod datur ad corrumpendum Iudicem, a [...] uuus quod unum facit, dantem scili­cet & occipi­entem.

The word here used for a reward, properly taken, signifies that which is given to a Judge, to corrupt or turn him aside in judge­ment. One of the Rabbins gives this reason, why it notes a bri­bing reward, because it is compounded of a word signifying, One; and a bribe makes the giver and the receiver, the Judge and party; One, or of one mind; A Judge should ever stand indifferent be­tween both parties, till the cause be heard, but a bribe makes him One of them.

Yet ordinarily, this word is put for any gift or help, subsidy or [...] Humor nativus in quo vigor corporis consi­stit, & opes, nam in opibus Consistit poten­tia hominum. supply of anothers wants.

Of your substance.] The word implies, the native, naturall strength, which supplies the wants, or supports the weaknesses of the body; As also the strength of the earth, by which it puts forth fruit, Lev. 26. 20. And because riches are a mans civil strength, therefore the same word expresses both.

Verse 23. Or did I say, deliver me from the enemies hand?

The enemies.] Or the hand of those that have brought me into straights; For the original imports, the shutting a man up in a narrow compass, so that he knows not how to get out; he that is in the hand of an enemy, is in a straight hand. Ahab commands (1 Kings 22. 29.) Goe carry Micaiah back, and feed him with the bread of affliction, or with the bread of straights, such bread, as an enemy provides. The Greek word used by the Apostle, 1 Cor. 4. 8. reaches this fully, We are troubled, but not distressed, or [Page 521] straightned. Now saith Job, did I say, deliver me out of the hand or power of mine enemies, who have brought me into these [...]. straights? alluding, as is conceived, to those Chaldeans and Sabe­ans, who had spoiled his estate, and slain his servants.

Or redeem me out of the hand of the mighty.

Redeem me. That is, my goods which they have carried away captive. To redeem, signifies the fetching back of a thing by price or force. Christ is a Redeemer in both sences: he redeemed or fetch'd back captivated man, by compact and by price, in re­spect of God his father. We are bought with a price, 1 Cor. 6. 20. that is, bought with a full prize. Christ did not compound with the justice of his father, but satisfied it, to redeem us: and he re­deemed us by force, out of the hands of Satan, Spoiling principa­lities and powers, and making a shew of them openly, Col. 2. 15. As in Triumphs, the Romans used to doe with their spoiled, captivated enemies. Job had not begged redemption of his friends, from the power of his enemies, either way: did I desire you, by compact, and by price, to ransome me? Or did I desire you to levy an Army, with power and force, to recover my estate out of the hands of those mighty oppressours.

The word [Mighty] signifies also terrible; the hand of the [...] Terribilis sua potentia for­midabilis terrible one: It is often applied to God, when he shewes him­self in terrour to wicked men. Psal. 89. 7. God is greatly to be feared, Isa. 2 19. He shakes terribly the earth. But most common­ly, to cruel, powerful men, who make no other use of their strength, but to be a terrour to innocents. The Apostle, Phil. 1. 28. explaines this word, while he saith, and in nothing be ye terrified by your adversities; that word in the Greek, answers this in the He­brew, your adversities are terrible men, men who think to beat down all with their great looks, but, be not ye terrified by these terrible ones. So here, Did I call unto you, to redeem me out of the hand of the mighty, the terrible? out of the hand of those cruel plunderers, the Sabeans and Chaldeans? De manu Tri­bulationis, Va­tab. Puto cum Al­legoricè tam graves & ve­hementes cala­mitates intelli­gere, Merc.

Further, Some understand by the hand of the mighty, not the persons afflicting him, but the affliction it self, which was upon him: Trouble is sometimes compared to a mighty enemy, Prov. 6. 11. So shall thy poverty come, as one that travelleth, and thy want as an armed man. Want strips us, but is it selfe, not only cloathed, but armed, Evils have so much life and strength in them, [Page 522] that they are compared to the strongest, who live, armed men. Hence ob­serve, first,

It is an aggravation of unkindnesse, to those, who are in want, not to be kind to them, when they are modest in asking a supply of their wants. Love ought to prevent asking, and should be moved to give most to them (who being in need) complain least.

Again, He speakes this to wipe off that aspersion, as if the losse of his estate were the thing which grieved and pinched him so sore. Did I say unto you, bring me a reward, &c. It is an argument that a man overloves that, which he hath lost, when he is over-importunate to have his losses repaired. If you had seen me call out unto you for an estate, then you had reason to think that the losse of my estate, was the losse of my patience.

Thirdly, Observe the temper of a gracious heart under losses and afflictions. A gracious heart under losses, is not forward to complain to creatures, or to ask help of men. Did I say, bring unto me, or give me a reward of your substance? He complaines to God, and sheweth him his trouble, he openes his want to God, and asketh sup­plies of him, but he is very modest and slow in complaining to, or in suing for help at the hand of creatures.

It is not unlawful for those, that are in want, to make their los­ses and wants known to men; It is a duty, rather, so to doe; onely it must be done with caution, least, when we ask of creatures too importunately, we give an argument against our selves, that we are too much in love with creatures.

As it is reproved in those Rulers before spoken of, Hos. 4. 18. that they did love, give ye; It is a crime in the rich, to love, give ye; And certainly it is a sin, at least an infirmity in those that are poor and in want, to love, give ye, or to say as Iob here had not, bring to me. Solomon speakes of the daughters of the horsleach, that, they are alwayes crying, give, give, noting their insatiable thirst af­ter blood. Some poor are alwayes crying, give, give, which notes a very inordinate desire after riches. Iob is very careful to take off the suspition of such a blemish from himself, I did not say, bring ye, or give ye me of your substance.

It is the duty of those that are full, to give to their empty bre­thren, it is their sin if they give not; and it is their shame, if they are not most free in giving to those, who are most modest in asking; But when God hath emptied us, we should not be eager in filling our selves. When God takes creatures from us, we should [Page 523] take heed of pursuing them: we should not doe any thing, which may argue our hearts glued to them, when the Lord hath loosen'd them out of our hands. It is an honour to a poor Christian, when in his greatest straights he can approve himself to God and men, and can say as the Apostle (Acts 20. 33.) I have coveted no mans sil­ver, or gold, or apparel. It is as sinful to covet in our wants, as it is in our abundance. And it is as bad (if not worse) to be greedy of the creature, when we are empty, as when we are full. A poor man op­pressing the poor, Prov 28. 3. and covering from the rich, are sights of e­qual abomination.

Vers. 24. Teach me and I will hold my tongue: and cause me to under­stand wherein I have erred, &c.

This and the next verse, contain the fourth branch of Jobs re­ply; and the general sence of them, is, a submission of himself to his friends, if yet, they should speak reason, or discover his error. Teach me and I will hold my peace; as if he had said, Though I have to the best of my understanding, thus far acquitted my self, and cleared mine own in­nocency; though, I have as I think, with truth and justice, laid this charge of uncharitablenesse and unfriendly dealing with me upon you; yet you shall see I am ready to hear you, I am teachable: if you can yet teach me, [...] Iecit, projecit, per metaphoram [...] rigavit quando trans­fertur ad plu­viam quae la­pidum & sa­gitarum instar ex coelo decidit in terram eam­que ferit, ri­gat, & foecun­dat. Hinc per Metathoram significat etiam docere Quod doctrina veluti instiletur ani­mis dicentium & ininutatim indatur, eosque impuat, I will keep silence, and if you cause me to understand wherein I have er­red, I shall doe so no more.

Teach me.] The Original word notes in strict sence, to cast a thing forth, to throw a thing, as a dart or a stone is thrown, either downward or upward, or in a direct motion forward. Hence by a Metaphor, it signifies raine, because raine is (as it were) darted forth from the clouds, and cast down upon the earth▪ And from hence (yet one remove further) the Metaphor is carried, to signifie teaching; Hence the holy Prophet is comman­ded to drop his word, Ezek. 20. 46. 21. 2. Sonne of man, set thy face toward the south, and drop thy word towards the south. Sonne of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and droop thy word toward the holy places: And the reason is this, because Doctrines, Truths and wholesome Instructions, are instilled and cast down among the people, or dropt into their spirits, as rain is cast or dropp'd from heaven upon the earth. And so we may read the word [...] out of the metaphor thus, rain down upon me, doe ye, O, my friends, like clouds full of water, dissolve, and showre down in­structions [Page 524] upon me, and see if I doe not receive and drink them in. And from this word, all doctrine and instruction, in the He­brew, is called, Torah, Prov. 13. 1. and Psal. 1. 1. And the Jewes, by way of eminency, call the five books of Moses (as also all the books of the old Testament) the Torah, that is, the Law, or rule of holy doctrine, which God rained down from Heaven, and di­stilled graciously upon his people, for their growth in knowledge and in holiness: And so a Teacher, from the same root, is called Moreh; Job. 36. 22 Who teacheth like Him? who raineth like him? there is no man can distill truths, as God doth. Moses (Deut. 32. 2.) elegantly sets forth his preaching, by an allegory of rain and dew. My doctrine shall drop as the rain,; my speech shall distil as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showres upon the grasse. And the Apostle Paul, Heb. 6, 7, 8. compares a taught people, to ground that is well watered with rain; For the earth which drinketh in the rain, that cometh oft upon it, and bring­eth forth fruit, is blessed; but that which beareth thorns and briers, is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing, whose end is to be burned. A people well instructed, are like that ground which is under continual showers and dews.

And doctrine is fitly compared to rain, and teaching to raining; First because all true & holy doctrine comes from God, as the rain doth. The rain is Gods proper gift, (Jer. 14. 22.) Can any of the vanities of the Gentiles give rain? All the men in the world, are not able to make one drop of rain; So we may say of this figurative rain of truth and holy doctrine, Can any of the vanities of the Gentiles? yea, can any of the most learned among the sons of men, give this rain? Can any man make any one truth, which hath not first been made above? Truth like rain comes from Heaven, it drops from beyond the clouds. Art not thou He? O Lord our God? therefore we will wait upon Thee, say they of the natural rain, Jer. 14. 22. and so we must in regard of the spi­ritual. Hence the word which Moses uses (Deut. 32. 2) for Accipere est discipuli ficut dare praeceptoris. [...] doctrine, dropping as the rain, signifies a received learning: Holy Truths are so called in that language, because the doctrine of Re­ligion, is received from God, not devised by men. So the Apostle phrases it (1 Cor. 11. 23.) I received of the Lord, that which I delivered unto you. And Christ himself, As my Father hath taught me, so I speak these things, John. 8. 28. That which Nico­demus said of Christ, is true of every one that teacheth truth, [Page 525] Joh. 3. 2. Thou art a Teacher come from God. As truth it self, so the teachers of it are from God; as a lye, and the tellers of it, are from the Devil, John. 1. 44.

Secondly, Like rain (as in regard of the original whence it comes, so) in regard of the effect: rain refresheth the earth; when the earth is weary and faint, when the earth gaspes and is parched, how doth a showre of rain revive it? When the Psalmist had spoken of the rain coming down upon the earth, he presently adds this effect, The little hills rejoyce on every side, they shout for joy, they also sing. Thus also a people wearied, and languish­ing, and fainting in ignorance, when they receive truths, and holy instructions, how do their hearts rejoyce, how do they laugh and sing? In the Parable, Mat 13. Some are said to receive the word with joy; Even they who are but formalists and hypocrites (for it is spoken of them) rejoyce and are refreshed for a season with the word. Truth is such a gracious showre, that they sometimes re­ceive it with joy, who have no grace. And if truth refresh men, who are but nature, or move in spiritual workes, but, upon natu­ral principles, how will it refresh those, who have grace, and spiri­tual principles sutable to it. Thou, O God (saith David, Psal. 68. 9 10.) didst send a plentiful rain, whereby thou didst refresh thine inheritance when it was weary. That is a truth in the letter, and some un­derstand it of natural rain; but others interpret that plentiful rain, in a figure, for the rain of doctrine which God sent down upon his people, when he gave the Law and dropt those heavenly Oracles from Mount Sinai upon his people Israel: that showre of the Law came indeed in a storm, Thunder and lightning, and a ter­rible tempest accompanied it. But though the thunder terrified, yet the showre refreshed; and the Saints have ever delighted in the matter of those instructions and holy counsels given there, though Moses a chief amongst the Saints, seared and quaked exceedingly at the manner of giving them.

Thirdly, as rain, so teaching makes fruitful. The Prophet Isaiah makes out this part of the similitude expressly, Chap. 55. 10, 11. As the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returns not thither, but waters the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: So shall my word be that goeth out of my mouth, &c. Hence also the people of God are compared (Deut. 32. 2.) to grasse and tender herbs, which grow and flourish, which are fed [Page 526] and bring forth fruit, when watered with the rain. It cannot be denied, though it be much to be lamented, that many souls upon whom much of this rain falls, are altogether barren and un­fruitful. But, Oh! How barren are those souls, upon whom not a droop of this rain ever fell! They that are deprived of these showres are under a grievous curse, even such a curse, as David im­precates upon the mountains of Gilboa, 2 Sam. 1. 21. Ye mountains of Gilboa, let there be no dew, neither let there be rain upon you, &c. When God saith unto a people, let there be no dew, no raine upon you, no Moses to drop doctrine upon you, no Paul to plant, no Appollo's to water you with the word, this is the saddest showre of curses that can fall upon a people; as without rain, so without the word, ordinarily, there can be no fruitfulnesse. You see at this time how upon a little with-holding of the natural raine, we presently fear barrennesse, and famine; the want of spiritual rain brings in a This was preacht in a time of drought. worse barrennesse, though there are not many who fear it, or are sensible of it.

Fourthly, the word taught is like rain in regard of the dispen­sing of it. The rain comes not down alike, at all times; showres are very various; sometimes it raines softly, then, we call it a still soaking rain; sometimes we have a strong mighty rain; at another time rain is accompanied with thunder and lightning, while the showres descend, the great Ordnance of heaven discharge from the clouds, and fill the air with terrour. Thus also it is, or should be in teaching: Many soules require a still, soft, quiet rain: O­thers must have stronger showres, mighty raine, you must powre down upon them. A third sort must have thunder joyned with rain, they need a Boanerges, a sonne of thunder, a mixture of terrour with instruction to bore their eares, and break their hearts. Those teachers mistake their work, who in stead of raining are al­wayes thundering and lightning. As if their pulpit were set upon Mount Sinai. And I believe, it is as great a mistake to think Tea­chers need never thunder. The word of God in all parts of it, and in all manner of dispensations of it, is exceeding useful. A Mini­ster without teaching, is (as Iude speakes) a cloud without water; And he shall doe but little good upon some, if he have nothing but water in his cloud. Fire sometime must mingle with the rain, and a Tempest come after or before the dewing, distilling, still voice. The word of God is compared to fire, as well as unto water. On­ly it must be the wisdome, and it is the duty, of every Teacher, to [Page 527] know how to give every one his portion, or as the Apostle Jude counsels, ver. 22, 23. Of some to have compassion, making a difference, and others to save with fear, pulling them out of the fire: A difference must be made, some are to be dealt with compassionately, and gent­ly rained upon; others, must be saved with fear, that is, they must be made afraid with thunder and lightning, with stormy and tem­pestuous doctrine. Some spirits will not be kept out of the fire, but by casting them into the fire; so much that text in Jude imports. Others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, As if he had said, your ter­rifying them with the fire, will be as a pulling them out of the fire, A showre of spiritual brimstone (such as God rained on Sodom in the letter) is best for them, if you spare them, you destroy them.

Teach me, and I will be silent, or, I will hold my tongue. The [...] Fedit terram, per metaphoram fodit cogitatio­ne, siluit. word properly taken, signifies to digge or to plow: And some­time improperly to meditate or think, and it implies much thoughtfulness, because a musing, meditating, thoughtfull man is ever digging into matters, he rests not in the out-side and face of things, but puts in his plow deep, turning them up to the very bot­tom. From whence, by one step further into the Metaphor, it is translated to signifie silence, or to hold our peace, because they who have many thoughts, have fewest words; Musing men are no great talkers; when the mind is much at worke, and very bu­sie, the tongue usually doth little: Job promises silence, as if he meant to sit down and consider fully, what they should further say unto him.

This promised silence or holding of his tongne, may have a three­fold reference.

First, in general to the duty of a learner, Teach yee me, and I will keep silence, I will learn.

Or secondly, to his former complaints, Teach me, and I will be si­lent: That is, I will give over complaining, I confess I have made a bitter complaint in the 3d Chapter, but if you will teach me better, I will complain no more.

Thirdly, it may have reference to that, which they should speak to him in their next advices. Teach me aright, and I will hold my tongue, that is, I will reply no more, I will not gain-say your coun­sels, but rather (if I have offended) acknowledge my errour and sit down in silence, I will not wrangle, when I cannot answer, I can doe nothing against the truth, but for the truth. From hence we may observe; first,

That a gracious spirit is a teachable spirit. A gracious heart cals for teaching. Teach me, and I will hold my tongue. As a gracious heart cals for strengthning from Christ, so it cals for tea­ching from Christ, and from any, who can teach the truth, as it is in Christ▪ A weak soul saith, Lord draw me, and I will runne after thee; an ignorant soul saith, Lord instruct me, that I may understand thee. Give me the wisdome of the prudent, that I may understand my way, and I shall walk therein. A godly man loves not to be at his own disposing, nor at his own Tutoring; He that will learn of none, but himself, hath (sure enough) a fool to his Master; And there is more hope of a fool, then of him, that is (thus) wise in his own conceit, Pro 26. 12. Secondly, Observe.

A teachable spirit is an excellent spirit. A man that is willing to be taught, is in a better condition then many, who are able to teach. It argues a holier temper of the heart, to be willing to be taught, than to be able to teach. And it is far worse to be unwil­ling to learn, then not to be knowing; Ʋnteachablenesse is more dangerous then ignorance. It is sad to consider how unteachable many are, they will not be taught, or they think they have lear­ned all, they have devoured all knowledge; they are full and need no more; some deceived souls (and they most) carry it, as if they had a spirit of infallibility, what, teach them? they are above teaching. It is a sweet frame of spirit, when a man sees he may be out of frame. He is in a fair way to truth, who acknow­ledges he may be in an errour. And he who will not acknowledge that he may be in an error, is certainly out of the way of truth. The Apostle resolves it, 1 Cor. 8. 2. If any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing, yet, as he ought to know. Not as if the Apostles meaning were, that all knowledge must be sceptical or uncertain, all in quaeries, and nothing in conclusions, that we should halt be­tween two opinions, and hang like meteors in the air. Nor doth he commend to us that proud modesty, which will not let us ac­knowledge, we know what we know; but his mind is, to meet with those, who think they know any thing so well, that they need not, or cannot know it better, and abound so in their own sence, that they have no room to admit the sence of others. As he, who thinks himselfe so good, that he cannot be better, was never so good, as he should; so, he that thinks he knows so much, that he can learn no more, knowes nothing as he ought. It is best to be fixed in judgement, but it is very ill to be fixed in opinion. It is [Page 529] to be feared that man is much divorced from right reason, who is so married to his own, that he resolves, nothing but death shall part him and his opinion. What if this man have espoused a fancy of his own, not any truth of God? To be so fixed, that a man may be fixed in evil, it is as dangerous, as, to be so unfixed, that he may be unfixed in good. It was a high breathing of holiness, when Da­vid said, Psal. 57. 7. My heart is fixed, O God, my heart is fixed: While we are upon a known duty, or have known truth on our side, our hearts cannot be too much fixed & set upon them. To be of an unfixed, moveable, wavering spirit in goodnesse, is within one degree of falling into evil; but to say, I am fixed, I am fixed, I am resolved, resolved, when yet things are doubful and under diffi­cult dispute, is actually to be in an errour, though possibly, the thing we fix on, be a truth. The Apostle cautions his Ephesi­ans, and us in them, Chap. 4. 14. That they and we, be not hence­forth children tossed too and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, and yet they are under a rebuke, who will not be mo­ved by any wind of doctrine; that is, let never so powerful and forcible a wind of truth, breath and blow upon them, they will not be carried or moved in judgement by it. Observe third­ly,

Silence becometh learners. Yet not all silence. There is a spea­king helpful to learning. To move doubts is the way to be resolved and to ask the question, the readiest means for instruction. But he that will have all the talk, shall have but little profit. The ear is the Organ of discipline: Hearing is the sence of learning, and the seasonable stopping of our own mouths, a ready means to open our understandings. To be, swift to hear, and flow to speak (James. 1. 19.) is the speediest way to attain wisdom. Fourthly observe,

He that is shewed his errour, should speak no more, but sit down convinced. Teach me (saith Job) and I will hold my tongue; That is, I will reply no more upon you, I will never stand up in maintaining an errour; I wil be no pattern of evil, though my self am in the fault. Errour shall not be excused; or a mistake apolo­gized for, by me. Some wits are able to make a fair cover for, and put a glosse upon the most deformed and grossest errours. There was never any opinion in the world, but some have seconded it, and undertaken it's protection. When conscience hath never a word to say, wit will be very talkative, and when they have en­ded [Page 530] reasoning, some can wrangle everlastingly. When wit and lear­ning undertake a cause, and leave conscience out of the Commissi­on, there must either be a very ill end of it, or no end. A subtil Sophister will despute any thing, and bring probable arguments (where reason alone sits judge) against the most undoubted truths. It is an ill office to be an Oratour for our own or others errous, for our own or others sinful practises, Prov. 30. 32. If thou hast done evil in lifting up thy selfe, or if thou hast thought evil (or maintained evil) lay thine hand upon thy mouth; speake no more, never be an advocate in a bad cause, though it be thine own; when our faults are shewed us, we should not open our mouths, unlesse it be to renounce and disclaim them. A sad account will be given of that time, and of those parts, which have been laid out in the patronage of our failings and mistakes. It is as sinful to few figg-leaves, or make fair pretexts to cover the nakednesse of our opini­ons, as of our practises.

And cause me to understand, wherein I have erred.

As if Job had said, when once you bring me to see clearly, that I am in an errour, and cast light into my conscience, you shall find me readily submitting to you.

A question arises here in the general, whether Job doubted his Concessio est quam Quintili­anus dicit esse, cum aliquid in­iquum vide­mur causae fidu­cia pati. Apud eum dicitur, confessio nihil nocitura. Quin. lib. 3, cap. 2. Non submittit se errasse, sed humiliter se submittit ami­corum censure. Bold. [...] In Hiphil in­telligentem se­cit, erudii [...]. cause, or whether or no, there were an hesitancy in his spirit, about what he had done or spoken?

I answer, this speech implies not, that he had any doubt of him­self, or an admission that he had erred. Job speaks like Oratours or Disputants, who when they are sure of a point, will yet grant a little doubtfulness, or raise doubts about what they are able to maintain and confident to carry. It is ordinary to put things by way of sup­position, of which we make no question. When Job saith, Cause me to understand, wherein I have erred; it is not an acknow­ledgement that he had a erred; but a submission in case he had, or a concession that he might; Job was not lifted up with an opinion of his own infallibility; he knew to erre was common to man, and therefore he speaks of himself under the common notion of all men: Not from any consciousnesse of his own errour.

Cause me to understand.

It is but one word in the Original, and it signifies to convince [Page 531] by reason or argument. Cause me to understand, that is, doe not think to force my opinion, or to offer violence to my judge­ment, doe not think to club me down with great words and clomorous threats, but doe it by solid Arguments, by evident demonstration of reason; Doe it by savourie advices and counsel, not by bitter reproaches and invectives. Deal with my understanding, not barely with my affections, Cause me to un­derstand.

My errour] It signifies local, corporal wandrings and er­rours, and bodily erring or wandring; and sometimes it signifies the wandrings of the mind, judgement and affections, Prov. 5. 19, 20. Solomon bids the husband, Rejoyce in the wife of his youth, let her be as a loving Hind and pleasant Roe, let her breasts satisfie thee at all times, and be thou ravished alwayes with her love. The Hebrew (as our Translatours put in the margin) is, erre thou al­waies in her love; that is, let all thy wandring, erring thoughts and affections be reduced and brought home to the wife, whom God hath given thee, the next words seeme to interpret so, for why (my sonne) wilt thou be ravished with a strange woman, and imbrace the bosome of a stranger? That's dangerous erring in love: Therefore (saith he) let all thine errings and wandrings, all thy delights and ravishments be (chast and conjugal) towards the wife of thy youth.

Further it signifies erring or wandring out of meer ignorance. This word is often used in Leviticus for the sin of ignorance, Chap. 4. 2. and Chap. 5. 18. and Chap. 22. 14. If any man hath sinned through ignorance or committed an errour, then he shall offer these and these sacrifices and oblations. So Psal. 19. 12. who can under­stand his errours; That is, those sinnes, which he commits out of ignorance and inadvertency? Hence he concludes with this pray­er, Cleanse thou me from secret faults. He doth not mean faults, which he committed privately, and so were secrets to others, but faults which he had committed ignorantly, and so were Secrets to himselfe: That is, they were sinnes of ignorance. And I conceive he means, not only such sins, as he had committed ig­norantly, but then knew they were sins, but even such sins, as he was ignorant, whether ever he had committed them or no; That is, he prayes for the pardon of all those sins, which possible he might have committed, though to him, as yet altogether unknown and undiscovered.

The title of the 7th Psalm. is Shiggaion of David; it is the same Original word we have in the text, and some translate it, awandring song; And the reason for it, is either because of the Cantio erratica. variable and wandring poetry, or because of the variable or wan­dring tune in which that Psalm was sung, and to which it was set for greater delight; others makes the title (sutable to the trans­lation of the word here) the Psalm of Davids errours, because, sets forth his fears and dangers, which made him wonder in bo­dy, and sometime also, to go a little astray in mind; this Psalm was sung to the Lord, concerning the words or the business of Cush the Benjamite, that is, of Saul, who was of Kish and of Jemini (1 Sam. 9. 1.) called here Cush, that is, Ethiopian or Blackmore (figuratively) from his black and ill conditions, his heart not being changed, as the Blackmore changeth not his skin. Saul was a bitter enemy to David, and made him flie and wan­der, and sometime go astray in his speeches and actions, upon a sudden gust of temptation. And so a Psalm of that subject may well bear this stile, either from his corporal or spiritual errours. There is a third apprehension upon Siggaion, taking it for delight and ravishments of mind, and so the Psalm is superscribed, Davids delight or solace; That is, the Psalm which he composed and sung to the Lord, to comfort himself in all his troubles with Saul; his soul wandred heaven-ward in holy ravishments and delights in God, while his body wandred about the earth in astonishment and sorrows, caused by a bloody-minded man.

The very same title is given to the prayer of Habakkuk, chap. 3. 1. A prayer of Habakkuk upon Sigionoth, which some interpret to be so called because of the strange variety or variableness of the song and tune, the Prophet being in a holy rapture, ravished in spi­rit, and swallowed up in the contemplation of Gods power and majesty soars up and wanders (like Paul in another case) he knowes not whither or how.

But the vulgar renders it, a prayer for ignorance, or a prayer for Oratio pro igno­rantijs. errour; which translation is surely an errour, if not an ignorance, as to the scope of that prayer: Though the letter of the Original word (as in the former instances, and in the text before us) bears that sence.

When Job saith, Cause me to understand my errour, his mea­ning is, that his errours (whatsoever they were) in that business were secret to him, he had not gone against the light of his own [Page 533] conscience, nor as yet, had they brought any light to convince his conscience; he had been charged with errours, extravagancies and wandrings; But he understood not what they were, and there­fore desires them to cause him to understand his errour. Observe hence, first,

Man is subject to errour. To errour in speech, to errour in pra­ctise, to errour in judgement. Man by nature, can do nothing else but erre, all his goings are goings astray, and all his know­ledge is bottomed upon a heap of false principles. All his works (by nature) are errata's, and the whole edition of his life, a continued mistake. Secondly observe;

That man is in a fair way to truth, who acknowledgeth he may erre. Cause me to understand wherein I have erred, saith Job; He thought he had not erred, but he grants it was possible for him to erre. That which hath fastened so many errous to the Popes chaire, and from thence scattered them over all the world, is an opinion, that he, in his chair cannot erre; his supposed spirit of infallibility, hath made him the great Deceiver, and deceived him. He that thinks he cannot erre, errs in thinking so, and sel­dome thinks, or speaks, or doth any thing, but it is an errour. He is most secured from errour, who suspects he hath erred, and humbly acknowledges that he may.

Thirdly, We may here observe what an errour is. An errour strictly and properly taken, is that which we hold or doe, out of bare ignorance of the Truth. It is an errour in practice, when we are ignorant of what is better to be done. An errour in opinion is, when we are ignorant of what is better for us to believe or hold; Heresie is an errour and more, for heresie hath these three things in it.

1. In regard of the matter, it must be in some great and funda­mental truths; The word Heresie, is by some derived from choosing, by others, from taking away, because it takes us off from Christ, or from the foundations of saving knowledge.

2. Heresie is accompanied with pertinacy and obstinacy, after clear light offered; It is possible, one may have an errour about things which are fundamental, and yet be no heretick: An he­retick is condemned of himself, Tit. 3. 10. But he will not be con­vinced by another. Not that he doth formally and in terms give sentence against, or condemn himself, but equivalently he doth, as the Apostle, Acts. 13. 46. speakes to the unbeleeving Jews, see­ing [Page 534] ye put the word from you, and judge your selves unworthy of everlasting life, &c. These men did not judge themselves such for­mally, they came not to the Apostle and said, we willingly submit our selves to hell and wrath; No, they thought very well of them­selves, and judged themselves worthy of eternal life. But their pra­ctice judged them, and gave a real sentance against them, while they acquitted themselves: Thus also a heretick (who ever hath a very high opinion of himself and his opinions) is condemned of him­self.

3. In heresie there, is taken of pleasure and delight, therefore he­resie is numbred among the lusts of the flesh, adultery and fornication, &c. Gal. 5 20. Hereticks desire to disperse and vend their opinions. A man onely in an errour, will weep over his opinions, and it grieves him that he dissents and goes contrary unto others. But he that stiffely maintains an errour, insults over others, and delights to maintain his opposition: he triumphs and boasts of his war, though he can never obtain victory (Truth onely is victorious.) And some learned Criticks observe as much, from the form of the Haereticus est cui voluptas est falsas tueri opiniones; ea enim est nomi­num Graecorum in [...] definen­tium proprietas ut ad qualita­tem designan­dam non adhi­beantur modo, sed etiam ad innuendam de­lectationem quam in ea ca­pit, cui illa qua­litas in est, Camer. My­roth, Evang. in cap. 3. Epist ad Titum. Greek word, Tit. 3. 11. So then, heresie is not only an errour in judg­ment, but a pertinacy in the will, and it takes in delight at the af­fections.

Fourthly observe from these words, Cause me understand wherein I have erred! That

An erring brother or friend, must not be importuned barely to leave his errour, but he must be made to understand his errour. Errour should not be left, nor truth received blind-fold; a man may sin in leaving an errour: they do (without question) who lay it down thinking it to be a truth; and there is little question, but they do, who leave it before they understand it to be an errour. It is much alike to reject an opinion as an errour, which we doe not understand, and to practice an opinion for a truth, which we doe not understand; If a man practice or beleeve a truth, not convinced that it is, or not con­ceiving it to be a truth, that truth is but as an errour, to him; be­cause he doth not beleeve or practice it under the notion of a truth: and so, if he leave an errour, which he is not convinced to be an er­rour, his leaving it is not much better (and in some cases it may be worse) then his holding it; because he leaves it not under the no­tion of an errour. We must not dance after other mens pipes, or see with other mens eyes: Except we know it is good we do, and e­vil which we leave und on, our not doing evil, is not good to us, and [Page 535] our doing good is (to us) no better then evil.

Verse 25. How forcible are right words? but what doth your arguing reprove?

Job speakes by way of admiration; How forcible! I cannot In Haebreo Ad­mirativum est elegans & pa­theticum, Bold. tell how forcible. It is an elegant way of expressing the highness of our thoughts. As Psal. 84. 1. How aimable are thy dwelling places O Lord of hosts! He admires in stead of speaking, they are so aimable, as I cannot tell how aimable they are: Put your thoughts to their utmost conceptions of beauty, and that beauty is in the dwellings of the Lord: So saith Job here, How forcible are right words! they are so forcible, as I cannot tell how forcible they are, I must admire and be silent.

How forcible are right words! The Chaldee Paraphrase reads it, how sweet are right words! interpreting it by that, Psal. 119. 103. Oh how sweet are thy Commandements unto me! they are sweeter than the honey and the honey comb. But the Originals differ, though that be a good sense.

We read, How forcible! The word signifies any thing that is [...] Acrimoniae no­tionem habet. strong, potent or mighty; It notes also acrimony, sharpnesse or smartnesse, and so it is often applyed to words either good or bad, 1 King. 2. 8. when David lay upon his death▪bead, giving his last advices to Solomon, Thou (saith he) hast Shimei with thee, who cursed me with a grievous curse. In the Hebrew it is this word, who cursed me with a sharp, strong, forcible curse, he cursed me with all his heart, with all his might, he laid load upon me. Evil words are strong, right words are strongest: Job had before at the 6th verse of this Chapter, called the discourses of Eliphaz unsavoury, in this he taxes them for flat or weak, right words have a pleasing acrimo­ny upon the palate of the soul, and a power upon the judgement, to sway and carry it; but yours are dull and feeble.

Some render it after the letter of the Hebrew, words of right or [...] Eloquia recti­tudinis, Mont. [...], Sept, [...], Aquil. truth: Others in the Concret, how forcible are the words of a right, or upright man! But take it as we translate, How forcible are right words! Words are right three wayes.

1. In the matter, when they are true.

2. In the manner, when they are plain direct and perspicuous.

3. In their use, when they are duely and properly applied, when the arrow is carried home to the white, then they are right words, or words of righteousnesse. When this three-fold rightnesse [Page 536] meets in words, how forcible, how strong are such words?

But what doth your arguing reprove? I confess there is great strength in right words, and in the words of the upright; but you have been long disputing the matter with me, and what have you got? where are your gains? The word signifies to rebuke with convicti­on and argument, to shew what is right, and to refute that which is contrary Job. 13. 3. the word is so used, Surely I would speak to [...] Arguit, redar­guit, praeparavit verba contra a­liquem disputan­do & ostenden­do jus. the Almighty and I desire to reason with God, to reason it out as it were by force of Argument with God. The word is answera­ble in sence, to that in the Greek used by the Apostle, Heb. 11. 1. Faith is a conviction or the evidence of things not seen, that is, an evident conviction; faith gives a stronger evidence then any rea­son, yea then sence; therefore though faith be of things that fall not under sence, and are above reason, yet faith is an evidence or a conviction, fuller then any Logical conviction or demonstra­tion. The Argument from such authority as faith grounds upon, is stronger and more convincing then any, or then all the reason in the world.

What doth your arguing reprove? Word for ward, what doth Quid discep­tando conficiet disceptatio ve­stra, q. d. quod vos re [...]guitis redarguendi verbo non est donandum. your disputation dispute? Or what doe your arguments argue? as if he had said, your arguing is no arguing, your reasons are no reasons; that which you have been arguing all this while with me, doth not so much as deserve the name of an argument (in my case) it hath no power or strength in it: Job laies a charge upon his friends by this opposition; Right words are forcible, but your ar­guments are not right, or, you are not right who argue, therefore what force, what power is there in what you have spoken? I can blow it all off as easily as a man can blow off a feather. Mr. Brought­ton varies somewhat from this sence. And what can your blame soundly blame: that is, you shall finde nothing blame: worthy or reprovable in me. Observe hence, first,

Words rightly spoken, are very forcible; Take it in the gene­ral. What mighty things have words, words duly spoken done? Abigail a weak woman, by a few right words overcame the strength and wrath of mighty David, and turned his whole army back; David with all his men, were in the heat of resolution, and upon a hot march to destroy Nabal, yet she stops them; And that woman speaking to Johab, (when Sheba fled to the City) with a few right words, prevailed to save the City, and stay the fury of war.

Take the point more strictly; The words of truth, are full of power, full of strength. Naked truth is too hard for armed errour. Truth hath the strength of God in it, therefore that must needs prevail. The Apostle professes, 2 Cor. 1. 3. We can doe no­thing against the truth; He means it in regard of the bent of his spirit, his heart could not move against truth; but we may use it in another sence, We can doe nothing against the truth, that is, let us put out the uttermost of our power, we can never prevail a­gainst the truth. Look upon truth in the promises, that will con­quer all: Look upon truth in the threatnings, that's forcible to overcome all. Jer. 1. 10. God gives the Prophet a commission, I have set thee over the Nations, and over the Kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build and to plant: Here is a strange commission for a Prophet; How could Jeremiah plant or root up, build or pull down Na­tions? He never drew sword, yet he performed this commis­sion fully, by his word: he pulled them down, and rooted them up by the word of threatning, and he planted them and built them with the word of promise, Zech. 1. 10. Your fathers are dead, they are gone, but my words (saith the Lord) which I spake by my servants the Prophets, did not they take hold of your fathers? Your fathers are dead, and the Prophets are dead, but my words live still, and did not they hold of your fa­thers? you esteemed my words as wind, but they were a strong wind, they blew down the power of your fathers. The Apostle gives this honour to all the word of God (which is all right) that it is mighty, or forcible, through God, to bring down strong holds, and to bring every thought into subjection unto Christ. And Heb. 4. 12. The word of God is mighty in operation. The energie of it is such, that nothing can stand before it, no lust can stand before it, no errour can stand before it, it bears down all with fine force.

Therefore take heed of standing in the way of right words. Truth comes with such a force, that no man is able to beare up against it. It is better to have all the men of the world against us, Than to have one word of God against us. One word of truth will doe more against us, than all the Armies in the world, no force can stand against this force, the force of the word will destroy the force of the sword. Truth will be the great Conquerour at last.

Thirdly, Take it in the Concrete, in reference to the speaker, How forcible is the word of an upright man! Then Observe.

The words of one, that is upright hearted, carry great strength and power with them. Truth loses by the patronage and defence which some give it. Truth gets little by the tongues of those men, who have no grace in their hearts. Truth in the mouth of a wicked man, is weakened by the falseness of his heart, and filthiness of his life. Sometimes precious truths are spoken by vilest men, but what force have they? they are not received or owned. Christ could not abide to hear the Devil speak truth. A godly man speakes with Authority, as it is said of Christ, He spake as one having authority, and not as the Scribes; the Scribes taught that which was truth, sometimes, and the Scribes had al­wayes authority to teach, the chair of Moses was theirs, they were not intruders upon an office they had no call to. When Christ saith, the Scribes and Pharises sit in Moses chair (Matt. 23. 2.) He speakes not onely (de facto) of what they did, but (de jure) of what they had right to doe; They were not usur­pers, or actors beyond their line. But though the Scribes had the right of authority to teach, yet their teaching had no force of authority, it was but talke. And it appears plainly, that the words of that hypocritical generation, the Scribes and Pharisees bare no weight with the people, because Christ gives them a charge, to observe and doe what the Scribes and Pharisees bid them: As intimating that the doctrine of those Scribes (though true) was low-priz'd and lay much unpractis'd, Mat. 23. 3. We must not shorten the hand of God, as if he might not use those who have no truth, to publish a truth; He may imploy what instruments he pleases, and he can make those that are evil, instruments of good. But look upon it ordinarily, thus it is, the word of truth hath most power, strength and force from the lips of those, who are upright in heart, and holy in life. How forcible are their words? The words of the wise, are like goads, or like nailes, fastened by the Masters of the Assembly, Eccl. 11. But the words of wicked masters in the assembly, are like nailes without points, they will not drive, or take hold, there is no fast­ning of them; Or the words of wicked men are like weak nailes, which break in the driving: What doe you arguing, reproving, teaching, you that carry your selves thus, what force have your words? Truth loses both strength and credit in your mouthes: [Page 539] Thou that teachest another, teachest thou not thy selfe? thou that preachest a man should not steal, doest thou steal? thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, doest thou commit adul­tery, &c? are the Apostles chiding expostulations with the Jewish Doctors, Rom. 2. And upon this he charges them with dishonoring God, and causing his name to be blasphemed among the Gen­tiles, vers. 23, 24. But what was the blasphemy? Surely this, The Gentiles grew to have a low esteeme of the word of God, his Law was of no force with them, because those teachers were so false to it, and unspoke with their lives, whatsoever their tongues had spoken. That which hath no force upon the spea­kers heart, hath seldome any upon the hearers. What doe your teachings teach, or your comfortings comfort? what doe your arguings argue, or your reprovings reproove? Shall vice reprove sin? as we speake proverbially: or if it doth, sin is not much hurt with those reprofs. Words spoken from the heart, goe to the heart, and words read in the life, are most forcible to reforme the life; Then the word goes forth cloathed with list and power when the preacher can reade his Sermon in his own heart, and the people in his life. He that speakes onely out of books, does much after his rate, who (as we say) speakes without book, And he that lives not what he speakes (what in him lies) kills what he speakes. And how shall such a dead letter (tis almost a miracle if it doth) conveigh a quickning spirit? Such arguings, seldome reprove any but the arguer, and him they alwayes reprove.

JOB Chap. 6. vers. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.

Doe ye imagine to reprove words, and the speeches of one that is desperate, which are as wind?

Yea, ye overwhelm the fatherlesse, and you digge a pit for your friend.

Now therefore be content, look upon me, for it is evident unto you, if I lie.

Return, I pray you, let it not be iniquity, yea return again: my righteous­ness is in it.

Is there iniquity in my tongue? Cannot my taste discern perverse things?

IN the two former verses, Job made an humble submission of himself unto the better counsel and instruction of his friends, if they could yet shew him wherein he had erred. In these five verses, he doth two things, further.

First, he expostulates with his friends about their former speech and carriage toward him.

Secondly, he admonishes them to be better advised, more mo­derate and considerate, in what they had yet to say unto him.

The former of these is contained in the 26. and 27. verses. And there are two branches of it.

1. He taxes them for making so light of what he had said, Doe ye imagine to reprove words, and the speeches of one that is desperate, which are as wind? ver. 26.

2. He taxeth them for laying such heavy load upon him, in what they had said, Yea, ye overwhelm the fatherlesse, and you digge a pit for your friend, vers. 27. As if he had spoken plainly thus, You have carried the matter hitherto with me, as if I had spoken nothing but bare, empty words, words without any weight; yea, as if I were rage­ing mad, distracted, desperate, not knowing, nor caring what I did, or what I speak; as if my whole discourse were no better, then meere vapouring, a puffe of wind, a nothing; and ye your selves rage a­gainst me with such violence, as a cruel hard-hearted tyrant is enraged with, against a poor, helplesse, innocent and forsaken friendlesse Orphan; or at best, ye deal with me, as cunning sophisters and subtill disputants, seeking to catch me in your intricate discourses and doubtfull debates, you make a pit for your friend.

This for the general sense of those two verses, containing an expostulation about his friends unfriendly dealing with him. Now to the particulars.

Doe ye imagine to reprove words?

The word we translate [imagine] notes a very curious, exqui­site and elaborate invention of any thing. The Vulgar referrs ima­gining [...] to the words, with which they did reprove, not to the act of reproving. Ye make a neat frame of wards to reprove me; and Ad increpan­dum tantum verba concinna­tis. Vulg. so the sense rises thus, you artificially imagine, mint and coyne ele­quent speeches and subtill argumentes, to reprove and convince me with; As if you came hither to shew your selves Logicians and O­ratours, rather than loving friends. This is your dealing, You ima­gine Num verba nu­da putatis argu­ere, q d. puta­tesne verba satis esse ad arguen­dum & discep­tandum sine ra­tione. Planior fuerit sensus, si [...] ante [...] subaudias, an cogitatis argu­ere [...] meris verbis. Merc. words, to reprove with. Others thus, Do you thinke that words reprove? That great words shall overcome me, without weight of reason? This sence referres also to the speech of Iobs friends; as if he had said, Do you stand devising words against me, or wording it with me? Do you thinke that your sine phrases and elaborate polisht language will carry the matter with me, will words repoove me? And so we may connect it with the sentence immediately fore-going, How forcible are right words? But what doth your arguing reprove? Your arguings, that are slight argu­ings? Your words, are meere words, a sound and a noise, Verba nuda & sola. Ʋt mu­lier mulier bo­na. Lana, lana alba, & si quae alia Gramati­cis observata. Drus. words set alone, are often taken for words only, for naked words, words without any due clothing of comelinesse and moderation, and without any ballast or weight of reason and discretion. And doe you (my friends) imagine to gain me, by such a parcel of words as these?

But according to the sense toucht before, Iob rather referrs to the opinion, which his friends had of his words; Do ye imagine to reprove words? That is, doe you thinke that you have nothing to answer or reprove, but a company of empty sillables, have I not spoke reason or sence all this while? Doe you thinke you dispute with some idle-headed fellow, who cares not what he saith, or saith he knows not what? Do you think, that your words are strong and full of reason, that yours are irrefragable arguments, and mine, but idle talk or a frothie discourse? That's a second in­terpretation, and that which I conceive more clear to this place. It followeth,

[Page 542] And the speeches of one that is desperate, which are as winds.

We must understand or repeat the first branch, And do ye i­magine to reprove, the speeches of one that is desperate which are as wind?

The speeches of one that is desperate. [The word signifies a per­son [...] a radice [...] Diffidit, despe­ravit, spem om­nem rei alicujus efficiendae aut consequ [...]nde ab­jecit seu amisit. that is quite without hope, who thinkes his estate past remedy or redresse, his wound incurable, his losses irreparable, and his brea­ches such, as can never be made up or healed. So Jer. 2. 25. where the Prophet counsels the Church, to return and repent, but, Thou saist there is no hope; or as we read it in the margin, thy case is desperate; what doe you talke of repentance and of returning now, all's lost, all is gone, I am undon, my estate can never be recove­red, Doe ye imagine to reprove the speeches of one, that is de­sperate?

Some referre this also, to the friends of Iob, thus: Doe yee thinke that bare words are answer enough for me, and that the speeches of a desperate mad man, which are nothing but wind and sound, are sufficient to refute me. And therefore you rise up against me in this storm and fury, speaking any thing, without study or premedi­tation.

But we may rather understand it, of Job himself, and that, as be­fore, he gave their sence of his words, that they were but wind; So here he gives us their apprehension of his person, that sure he was mad or desperate.

Doe ye imagine that I am desperate or distracted, because I have little or no hope to be restored? Because I have lost my estate, my strength, my children, doe ye also think I have lost my wits, my reason and understanding. I confesse I am even worne to pieces and brought to nothing, I am spent and consumed with sorrows, that's my condition, but am I therefore desperate, and regard not what I speak? It is an easie and a compendious way of refuting all a man can say, to say he is mad. His words must needs be but wind, without weight, who is himself without reason. Doe ye think to reprove the words of one that is desperate, that are as wind? Or, as Haud sane ita convenit, ut pro futilibus, verba mea habeatis, eo quod afflictoni­bus attritus sum & tabefa­ctus. Merc. Mr Broughton reads, Doe ye hold the termes of the forlorne, a wind? That is, doe ye thinke, because I am in such a sad condition, and in appearance in a desperate condition, that therefore my words are light and vain, such as are no more to be regarded or heeded, than a puffe of wind? And so it is, as if he had said, ye ought not to [Page 543] slight what I speak, because I am in such a low forlorne condition. That of Solomon comes to this sence, Eccl. 9. 16. The poor mans wis­dome is despised, and his words are not heard.

It is common in Scripture to put light, vain and unprofitable words under this expression, they are but wind. In the 15th of this book, verse. 3. Should he reason with unprofitable talk, or with speeches wherewith he can doe no good? Should a wise man utter vain knowledge, and fill his belly with the East-wind? That is, should a man talk nothing, but that which is vain and un­profitable? And so, Jer. 5. 13. The Prophet shall become wind; That is, their prophecies shall become wind; what­soever they speak (said that unbelieving people) shall be put as a vain thing, it shall be as nothing, it shall pass away, and the place of it shall be known no more; Thus they undervalued the Prophets in those times, when they spake the truth of God, and brought them immediate messages from heaven. Hence observe; First,

That words without reason, meer vain words, are no words, they are but wind.

Hence those prophane ones in Jeremy, who said the true Pro­phets had belied the Lord, and were but wind, adde presently, And the word is not in them: That is, the words of these Pro­phets are no words. Indeed the Lord answers for his Prophets, at the 14th verse, telling the people, because they had thus dishonou­red his messengers, that they should find those words, which they accounted wind, to be a fire, Thus, saith the Lord, because ye speak this word, behold, I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them. Whosoever e­steems the word of God to be wind, shall find it to be a fire: and they who will not be taught by it, shall be consumed by it. But to the point in hand, we see in that Scripture vain words are windie words, and windie words as are no words: The Prophets (as they supposed) were wind, and thence they inferre, the word is not in them: That is, their words have no substance, strength or pow­er at all in them. So, Hos. 12. 1. Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after the East-wind; What was the wind that Ephraim fed upon? Some vain words, some promises, he had from the creature to be delivered, some hopes raised by the word of man, who is a wind; therefore his feeding upon those hopes, was but a feeding upon wind, there was no ground or strength to make those [Page 544] words good. So the next words interpret, He daily increaseth lyes.

Such words are (by the learned) called bubbles; And why Bullatus nugas. Pers Sat 5. ut­po [...]e similia bul­lis vento plenis. bubbles? Because a bubble upon the water is only filled with wind, toucht it, and it is nothing. These words have nothing in them, but the breath of the speaker.

Unlesse the spirit of reason fills our mouths, we speak nothing but our breath, or as we phrase it in our language, we doe but va­pour. The Apostle Peter describes such (2 Epist. 2. 18.) They speak great swelling words of vanity; And the Apostle Jude [...], uses the same expression, in the 16th verse of his Epistle. Their mouth speaketh great swelling words; that is, words greatly swelled with vanity. Or swel'd, as the flesh swels, by the gathering of cor­ruption, and ill humours. The greatnesse of these words was their disease, and not their nature: Wise men speak great things, and fools speak great words. Secondly, Observe,

That windie, empty words, will never either convince, or convert.

Such words doe no work: they are wind, and they passe away like wind without any impression, upon the hearers. They trouble the eare, but touch not the heart. When the noise of them is past, all is past. They are a sound, and besides that, a nothing. Windy meats are not nourishing for the body, neither are windy words for the soul. Some knowledge doth not build up, but puffe up, 1 Cor. 8. 1. and that's all the knowledge, which such words can breed, when they breed any. Thirdly, observe,

We are apt to judge the words of those that are greatly afflicted, to be but vain windy words. And we are ready to conclude, they complaine more then they need. When the Israelites groaning under the pressures of that bondage, sent to Pharaoh for some a­batement of their burdens: we will not diminish the tale of the bricks, only let straw be given us, no saith Pharaoh, Exod. 5. 17. They are idle, let more work be laid upon the people, that they may la­bour therein, and let them not regard vain words. He resolved to deal wisely with them, and therefore must count them mad: their per­sons were near Jobs condition, and their words were fully under the same censure. Fourthly, hence note,

That it is very sinfull to esteem the words of the afflicted to be but wind.

It was great uncharitablenesse in Jobs friends, thus to expound [Page 545] and glosse the text of his complaints. We should heare a man in affliction; as if every word were drenched and steeped in the sor­rowes of his heart; and take every sentence, as coming bloudy from his wounded spirit.

Lastly, observe, how Job describes his own estate, he was, as a man desperate (not utterly desperate, for in another place he pro­fesses in highest confidence, that though God kill him, yet he will trust in him) yet desperate he was in regard of outward help, or temporal succour.

A godly man in affliction may sometime think his case despe­rate and remedilesse. Wicked men resolve in the Psalme, There is no help for him in his God; and a good man under a cloud of temptation may say, Surely, there is no help for me in my God; that is, I see not which way I shall be helped, I have no assurance, no evidence that God will help me: Not that he doubts the pow­er of God to help him: But the providence of God seemes to speak that he will not, I shall one day perish by the hand of Saul, saith ho­ly David. Heman looked upon himself, as a man that had no strength, free among the dead, Psal. 88. 5. As if he had got a dis­charge from the service of this world, and was enfranchiz'd a Ci­tizen of the grave, where all are free. As (to note that only in pas­sage) It is said of Azariah, being smitten with leprosie, and so put from the exercise of the government, which was a civil death; that he dwelt in a several house, or in a house of freedome, 2 Kin. 15. 5.

Verse 27. Yea, you overwhelm the fatherless, and you digg a pit for your friend.

After he had convinced them of their uncharitableness in ac­counting his words light and windie, he shewes them how they dealt with him, what kind of words theirs were towards him: their words were as swords, their words were blowes, every expression of theirs to his ear, was an oppression upon his spirit; Yea overwhelm the fatherless; He sets forth their (as he conceived) cruelty against him, by two things, very odious both;

First, the undoing of a fatherless child.

Secondly, the digging of a pit (not for an enemy, but) for a friend.

First, Ye overwhelm the fatherless.

The Original is full of Emphasis, word for word, it may be [Page 546] translated thus, You throw your selves upon the fatherlesse; and so it is an allusion to hunters, either to men, when they hunt wilde beasts; or to wilde beasts, when they hunt their prey; as soon as the hunter can reach the game, hee overwhelmes it, he casts him­self down, or layes all his strength upon it. A dogge having caught the hare, falls upon it, and keeps it under. Some conceive that expression, Gen. 49 9. concerning Judah▪ compared to a lion, reaches this sense, Judah is a Lions whelp, from the prey my sonne, thou art gone up, he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old Lion, who shall rouse him up? As if that that crouching and lying down, were when he hath taken his prey; who dares to stirre up a Lion, when he hath his prey under him, if any dare, the Lion will make them a prey too. We see in daily experience, how an­gry a dogge will be, if you stir him up, when he hath but a bone under him. Such a violence is noted in this expression, you throw your selves down upon a poor fatherlesse one, a man in a low condition, as if you would tear him to pieces, and eat him up at a morsell. Our translation comes near this signification of the word, Ye overwhelm the fatherlesse.

The word signifies to run upon one with violence, and hence Gi­ants [...] Ruit, irruit. are called Nephilim in the Hebrew, which is as much as to say, Oppressours, because they overwhelm the weaker with force and vi­olence.

Mr. Broughton translates the word to another sence, as noting, not an open violent way of oppressing, but a secret subtil way of circumventing, Ye lay a snare for the Orphan: the word may bear that sence, namely, to set a trap, or to lay a snare: And he para­lels [...], Scandatum est impedimentum in via, ut quis vel collabatur & ruat, vel ab instituto cursu impediatur. it, with that word used often in the new Testament To scan­dalize or offend a brother, which properly signifies to lay a trap or a snare, to set somewhat whereby to entangle or catch a man, that he may be stopt and hindered in his way. Thus Job of his friends, you set a trap to ensnare, and make a pit for me to fall into, or you lay a block to cause me to stumble, in, or turn out of, the ways of holinesse, while you would perswade me, that he who walkes up­rightly in that way, shall never meet with any rubbe of outward trouble. What is this but to discourage me in the way I walk, be­cause therein I have met so many troubles. Thus you lay a snare for,

The fatherlesse.] The word strictly taken, notes a child, whose parents are dead. Some of the Ancients say, the word Pupill, [Page 547] which is from the latine, signifies one without sight, or wanting the apple or Pupil of his eyes, because being deprived of his pa­rents, he wants the light of counsel and direction, to carry him Pupillus juxta Augustinum & I [...]idorum ita di­citur, quasi sine oculis, quae pu­pillae dicuntur, i. e. parentibus or­bus. on, in his course through the world. What Moses spake to Hobab his father in law, is a truth of all good parents to their children, They are to them in stead of eyes, Numb. 10. 31. But here by fa­therless, we may rather understand any one, that is destitute of help, though himself be a father. He that hath many children may (in this sence) be an Orphan, that is, friendlesse and comfortlesse. So Psal. 10. 14. Thou art the helper of the fatherlesse; that is, Thou art the helper of all those, who want help. That's the meaning of Christs promise to his Disciples, I will not leave you comfortless; the Greek is, I will not leave you Orphans or fatherless; Orphans and fatherless are usually full of sorrows, therefore to be left fatherless, and to be left comfortless are the same. In this larger sence take Jobs mind, You overwhelm the fatherless; that is, you overwhelm me, who am a poor, destitute, helplesse man, who have no friend, succour or support.

And you digge a pit for your friend.

Word for word, thus, You digge for your friend. And this is on all Velut laqueum & decipulam struitis ad eum capiendum. i, e. captionibus & cavilis eum ni­tamini circum­venire. Merc. sides agreed on, to intimate the secret circumvention or subtil pra­ctice (as Job apprehended) of his friends. For in Scripture, to dig a pit is a proverbial speech, and imports the laying of some secret plot to circumvent another, either in word or deed. So Psal. 7. 15. He made apit and digged it, and is fallen into it himselfe; that is, he devised some mischievous device to entrap his brother, and the mischief is fallen upon his own head, Psal. 64. 5. They commune of laying snares privily; And Isa. 29. 21. the Prophet describes evil work­ers, thus, They digge deep to hide their counsell from the Lord; wick­ed Polititians are diggers and underminers; sometimes this is true literally (as in our powder-plotters) but mystically and myste­riously every one that laies a plot (though he never breaks ground) is said to dig a pit for his neighbour, In the old law (Exod, 21. 33.) A provision was made, that whosoever digged a pit, should cover it, because pits were dangerous, both for men and cattel To dig a pit for a friend, is to endanger a friend.

In this sence, the latter part of the verses agrees with Mr Brough­tons translation of the first, Ye lay a snare for the Orphan, and ye digge a pit for your friend; False and fallacious arguments are [Page 548] traps and pits, in which the innocent are entangled. And Job sup­poses, his friends intended to cast him down into the pit of despair by charging him with hypocrisie and rottennesse of heart in his profession.

There is a further apprehension concerning this word, You have [...] Sgnificat fodere & convivium instruere. Epu­lamini super so­cium vestrum. digged a pit. Some of the Hebrew Doctours translate thus, You make a feast upon your friend. The word signifies not only to dig a pit, but to feast and banquet, and it notes a sumptuous exquisite banquet, 2 King. 6. 23. And he prepared great provision for them, in this book, Chap. 41. 6. The word is used in that sence, where Leviathan is described too big for a banquet, Shall thy companions make a ban­quet of him? that is, are the fisher-men able to catch and eat Levia­than? As if Leviathan scorned the fisher-mens engines, their nets and hooks.

Taking the word so, the meaning of the clause may be thus con­ceived, You overwhelm the fatherlesse, yea you are not conten­ted with that, but you feast upon your poor friend, that is, you rejoyce in his misery, and make your selves merry with his sorrows; as the Philistines dealt with Sampson, when they had put out his eyes, Come let us bring him out and make sport with him; So saith Job, you deal with me, you oppresse me, and then make your selves merry with my sorrows. The teares of an oppressed poor man, are as wine to the oppressour, he drinks them down; the groans of a poor man are as musick to a wicked oppressour, and his flesh is as meat to him. Hence observe; First,

To be fatherlesse is to be in a sad condition. They who are fa­therlesse, are friendlesse and so most subject to oppression. They who have least help in themselves, have usually least help from others, and often receive most hurt from others. Hence we find (Ps. 10. 18) the oppressed and the fatherless put together; as if the fatherless were to expect oppression for their portion, and they who needed most protection, should be sure to find most vexation. We use to say, where the hedge is lowest, there men goe over; it is so in every daies experience. The mighty Nimrods ride over the backs of the poor. And where the hedge is low, they make low­er gaps, to pass over more easily to their own designes. This spi­rit of oppression is described raging against those, who are under heaviest pressures, Psal. 69. 26. They persecute him whom thou hast smitten, and they talk to the grief of those whom thou hast wounded: When wicked men see a man afflicted by the hand of [Page 549] God, they afflict him more; when they see God hath wounded him, they will kill him. The trouble he is in, makes their victory more easie; As when the Philistines fell before Jonathan (1 Sam. 14.) his Armour-bearer slew after him; so do these, they slay those who are fallen before the afflicting hand of God. Observe secondly;

That it is a great aggravation of the sinfulnesse of oppression and wrong doing, to oppresse or do wrong to the fatherlesse. Commonly the poor are most oppressed, but alwayes there is more sinne in oppressing the poor, though to oppresse or wrong the rich be a sin, and a very great one. What a stock of wickednesse doe they gather, who take from these to whom they are bound to give, who make them naked and hungry, whom they should cloath and feed: who are straitened in justice towards them, to whom they ought to be enlarged in charity. It is a sin to deny them justice, who need not your charity, but to be unjust where we should be charitable, how sinful is that! It is a great sin to take away from him, who hath aboundance, but to take away from him, who is in want, is an abounding sin. Therefore we find that given, not only as a rule, but as a charge, Prov. 22 22. Rob not the poor because he is poor, make not poverty your ad­vantage for robbery. There is much baseness in it (besides the sinfulness) to trample upon those who cannot resist, and perhaps dare not complain. God is most resisted in wronging those who cannot resist others, or right themselves. When we help a poor man (especially a godly poor man) God himself gaines, and (in a sence) is inriched by it; because God receives glory, and is paid (which is his greatest revenew from man) in honour and in praise, for all the help we give such poor. In our alms, we per­forme Gods promises for him; and they who receive premises, cannot but return praise. On the other side, when we wrong the poor (especially the godly poore) God himself looses, and (in a sence) is impoverished; because not onely his praise (as much as we can doe) is with-held, but his truth and faithfulnesse are questioned. Mans uncharitableness, would make void, the promi­ses of God; and when promises lye unfulfilled, praise lyes unre­turned. Hence that threatning prohibition, Prov. 23. 10, 11. Enter not into the fields of the fatherlesse; that is, make not a forcible or violent entry. Why, is it more dangerous to enter in­to his field, than into anothers? Or is there any license here to [Page 550] enter into the field of a rich man, or to trespasse upon him? No, there is no license to trespass upon a rich man, or to enter upon his field, but take heed you enter not into the fields of the fatherless; why? For their Redeemer is mighty, he shall plead their cause with thee; Though poor orphans and fatherless have no might, no help, they cannot plead themselves, and they have no friend to help or plead for them, they cannot get an Advocate or Coun­cellour speak in their cause, Yet their redeemer is strong, he will plead with thee; He will plead with thee, for the wrong done the fatherlesse, as for a wrong done himself, because thou hast opprest one, whom he undertook to protect, and so (as much as thou canst) hast brought up an ill report upon the Lord, as if he were either forgetful of his word, or unable to accomplish it. We vex and tear the promises of God, every time we vex and teare the poor of God. How sinful then is this sin; by which at once we break the command, which God gives us, to relieve the poor, and weaken the promise, which God hath given the poor, that they shall be relieved.

Observe further from that expression of their cunning dealing with him, You digge a pit for your friend; deceitfull words are as pits and snares to catch men in: The tongue is a great insnarer. The tongue teacheth to lay a snare, Balaam taught Balak to lay a stumbling block before the children of Israel, Revel. 2. 14. He taught him how to dig a pit, and set such a snare, as catcht the peo­ple into adultery and Idolatry: The tongue is a great Engineer, a trap-setter to catch and intangle both the estates and souls of men.

And we may note another point, from the relation of the person for whom this pit was digged, You dig a pit for your friend. It is a great aggravation of unkindness, to endeavour their hurt, to whom we are bound by many names and obligations to doe good, or to whom we have made profession of our readiness to doe them good. The more duty or respect we owe any man, the more is our sin when we neglect him.

The three remaining verses of this Chapter, contain Jobs admo­nition to his friends, wherein he advises them, to deal better, or more moderately with him, and so he makes a trnsiation to the latter part of his speech, in the seventh Chapter, wherein he re­turns to the old matter, the justification of that complaint made against his life, and the equity of his desire to die.

[Page 551] Verse 28. Now therefore be content, look upon me, for it is evident unto you, if I lie.

Now therefore be content, &c.] Some read it, Now therefore begin to look upon me, or to look more favourably upon me; as if he had said, all [...] Acquicscere in re quapiam e­amque tota vo­luntate ample­cti. Significat etiam inchoare, Deut. 1. 5. Gen. 18. 17. this while ye had hardened your faces, and clouded your brows a­gainst me, therefore now begin to be more benigne in your aspects towards me. The word signifies, to begin, or take a thing in hand willingly; as also to be well pleased, content or satisfied, the sence of all comes to one point. We translate in the latter, Now therefore be content, doe this thing freely, be satisfied and acquiesce in it: as we use to cool and calme an angry friend, who disputing or speaking to a business, growes hot and passionate, I pray, sir, be satisfied, let us goe on meekly and moderately.

Look upon me. Which notes either his desire of their friend­ly compliance with, and respect to him, as Mr. Broughton reades, Now therefore be content, regard me; or it notes the strength and firmenesse of Jobes resolution, in this contest with his friends, I am not afraid to look you in the face, or to speake face to face, look upon me, you shall not read either fear or false­nesse written in my forehead; the lines and characters of my coun­tenance, shall shew you nothing but the soundnesse and integrity of my conscience. For it is evident unto you, if I lie, you will anon read the lie in my face, if there be a lie in my heart; there­fore break not off with me, turn not away in discontent, let us discourse a little more about this businesse, and the truth will ap­pear. [...]

It is evident unto you, if I lie. The Hebrew is, it is before your face if I lie, that is (as we translate) it will quickly be evident, and appear unto you by a little sober debate of this businesse, whe­ther I am right or no. Et in faciem vestrum si men­tior; sc. despe­ream vel mo­riar, vel non sit mihi propitius Deus, vel tale quippiam, Mer.

Some think, there is a kind of secret imprecation in this speech, It will be evident unto you, if I lie: As if he had said, Let not the Lord be mercifull or gracious unto me, let not the Lord pity or spare me, If I am false hearted and lie unto you. It is frequent and fa­miliar in the Hebrew, to give such expressions of an oath; As in that oath of God, Psalm. 95. 11. quoted Heb. 3. 11. Ʋnto whom I sware in my wrath, If they shall enter into my rest; which we translate by a plain negative in both places: They shall not enter [Page 552] into my rest. And Psal 89 39. Once have I sworn by my holiness, that I will not lie unto David, or, if I lie unto David; then, let not my word be taken any more; So, Job here, it will he evident to you, if I lie, and if I doe, let me not have help, or strength, or support from God any more.

To lie, may be taken two wayes; either strictly, as to lye, is to Mentire est con­tramentem ite. speak that which is false, with an intent to deceive. To speak against clear knowledge, is the proper, strict sence of a lie: Or to lie, signifies to fail, or to come short in that which is expected from us by others; To frustrate any of their hopes, is to lie to them; and so it is applied often times to the fruites of the earth, (Hab. 3. 17.) Though the labour of the Olive shall fail, the word is, though the labour of the Olive should lie, that is, though you coming to find fruit of the Olive, should find none there. The Olive whose fair leaves promise and speak you fair, as if you should have fruit, if when you come, it yeelds none, this Olive lies to you; So (Hos. 9. 2.) The new wine shall lie, we translate it The new wine shall fail, that is, the vines which speake thus much, that you shall have new wine shortly if when you come, there is none, the vines lie. In either of these sences we may understand it; Spem mentita seges. Hor. If I lie; that is, if I speak any thing against my mind, wittingly or willingly; or if I fail in this business, if I am like the vine or like the olive, when they give no fruit according to expectation; it will be evident unto you, you shall see if we discusse this con­troversie a little further the truth will out, whether I shall fail or belie your expectation, or no. That place (Chap. 24. 25) will ex­pound it so, who will make me a lyar, (saith Job) and make my speech nothing worth? as if he had said, my words shall be made good, and I will not fail in that which I have undertaken, or taken upon me.

There is a further apprehension about these words, Look upon Totus hic ver­sus eleganter in­sinuat rem so­rensem, nempe judic is strict is­simum examen cosentes & testes interrogat, non solum verbis, sed etiam nutibus oculorum & in­tuitu. Bold. me, it is evident unto you, if I lie, as i [...] they were an allusion to the carriage of Judges and Magistrates towards offenders, in pub­lick judiciary tryals: when an offender or one accused for any of­fence, is brought before a judge, and stands at the bar to be ar­raigned; the judge looks upon him, eyes him, sets his eye upon him, and he bids the offender look up in his face, look upon me (saith the judge) and speak up; guiltiness usually clouds the forehead, and cloaths the br [...]w; The weight of guilt holds down the head, The evil doer hath an ill look; or dares not look up; how glad is he, if the judge look off him. We have such an expres­sion, [Page 553] Psal. 11. 4. speaking of the Lord, the great Judge of Hea­ven and earth, His eye-lids try the children of men, as a Judge tries a guilty person with his eye, and reades the characters of his wic­kednesse printed in his face; Hence, we have a common speech in our language, such an one looks suspiciously, or he hath a guilty looke. At that great Goale-delivery, described (Rev. 6. 16.) all the pri­soners cry out to be hid from the face of him that sate upon the throne, They could not looke upon Christ, and they could not en­dure Christ should looke on them; The eye-lids of Christ try the children of men. That of Solomon may help this sence, Pro. 20. 8. A King that sitteth in the throne of judgement, scattereth a­way all evill with his eyes. Wickednesse cannot endure to be un­der the observation of any eye, much lesse of the eye of Justice. Hence the actors of it, say, Who seeth us. It is very hard, not to shew Heu quam diffi­cile est, crimen non prodere vultu, Ovid. secund. Metam. the guilt of the heart in the face, and it is as hard, to have it seen there. Job seemes to offer himself to the view of the severest Judge, Be content look upon me, if I am guilty, it will quickly appeare unto you, my hypocrisie will breake out in my face, and you may reade my conscience, in my countenance. It is no­ted of Paul, Acts 13. 59. that when he had to deal witb Elymas the Sorcerer, he set his eyes upon him, and said, O full of all sub­tilty. The Apostle beate him downe, as it were, with a cast of his eye; Job bids his friends looke upon him as long, and as critically as they pleased, he was not afraid of there lookes.

Lastly, thus, looke to me, that is, attend well what I say, for I will explaine my minde so fully and clearely to you, that it will quickly be evident to you, whether I am right or wrong.

We may observe from this passage, first,

That uprightnesse hath much boldnesse. He that hath a good cause and a good conscience, is not afraid to be searched to the bot­tome; he cares not who lookes upon him, or who lookes into him. David in regard of the uprightnesse of his heart, calls unto God himself, Search me, and try me, it there be any way of wickednesse in me, Psal. 139. 23. David was so assured at his own integrity, that he was not afraide to put him self upon the highest triall, in that point: A holy heart is willing, that God and men should search it; even search it with candles, as God threatens he would, the corrupt and false-hearted Jews.

Secondly note this from it;

Where a lie is, it will not long he hid. A lie will breake forth [Page 554] one time or other; you may cover and hide a lie, you may keep it, close, and sit upon it, as Rachel upon her fathers Images, but at last it will be evident, a lie will out. We say, Truth is the daughter of time, and so is a lie too: a little time will bring that work of dark­nesse to light.

Take the word in the other sence, for failing, and it yeelds us this Instruction. That.

He who hath uprightnesse of heart, is stedfast for ever. Truth is uniforme: Which way soever the wind and the world turne, his posture is the same, Christ will not faile him, and therefore he cannot. Such a man is as Mount Zion, that shall never be remo­ved; when the heart is sound, the actions are steady; and he that moves upon a right principle, moves regularly; and in all changes of events, changes not his way: try him, and try him again, it will be evident unto you, he will not lie. Grace is ever the same, and renders them who have it, like him (in their degree) from whom they have it, without variablenesse or shadow of turning. He that is not (for the substance) what he was, was never what he ought to be, sincere. He that is upon a good ground, and knowes his ground, will stand to it; trust him (as a creature may be trusted) and he will not faile.

Vers 29. Returne; I pray you, let it not be iniquity, yea, returne againe; my righteousnesse is in it.

He goes on to bespeake his friends to heare him better. Returne] The word signifies.

First, A Locall returne, or returning from a place.

Secondly, It is used Metaphorically, to returne from anger, or [...] Redire signifi­cat, sed saepe transfertur ad animum, est (que) a proposito ab si­stere, institu­tum vita mu­tare, & paeni­tentiam agere. to turn anger away; Isa. 5. 25. His anger is not turned away, the Lord did not turn from his feirce wrath. Some understand it so here, Return I pray you, that is, I beseech you be not so angry, be not so hasty and cholerick with me.

Thirdly, To turn or return, notes desisting from our purpose, or the change of our resolutions. And thus it is the same with re­pentance, the Scripture aboundes with the word in the sence, I shall not need to quote texts: Thus, most understand it here, Re­turne, that is, repent of your former hard dealing with me, persist not in it, persevere not in your uncharitablenesse. Ʋbi redierit is, & tursum re­dieritis id est. ubi iterum, at (que) iterum omnia d [...]iigenter dis­cusseritis, codem subinde redeun­tes, & cadem accuratius repu­tantes, meani cognoscetis justi­tiam.

Or lastly, Returne, that is, weigh the matter better, Return, looke it over againe, let it have your second and more setled [Page 555] thoughts; consider, whether I speake not, as one constrained to this seeming impatience, from reall sorrow, rather then from a professed hypocrisie. So, he bespeakes his friends againe, Chap. 17. 10. But as for you all, doe you return and come now (that is, be better advised, as the next words expound his meaning) for I can­not find one wise man among you. As if he had said, you have not shewed any great treasures of wisdom, in all your disputations against me hitherto; And therefore he tells them (Chap. 19. 28.) what counsels became them to take. Yee should say, why persecute we him? let us give over such hard censures and wounding lan­guage. Say to your selves, let us return, as here he saith to them, return I pray you.

Let it not be iniquity.] Some understand it thus, let not the thing which is objected against me be iniquity, object not unrigh­teously against me: Or thus,

Secondly, in this disputation, as it shall be carried on againe, deale not so unequally, so unjustly and hardly with me as before, deale fairely, uprightly, candidly and friendly with me, Return, I pray you, let it not be iniquity; let there not be such wrangling and hard speeches between us, as hitherto there have been. Mr Broughton agrees to either sence. Change your mind now: let not unrighteousnesse be objected.

Yet the Hebrew particle (Al) doth not alwayes forbid, but of­ten Particula [...] non semper pro­hibet, sed ali­qu [...]ndo simpli­citer negat. Non erit ini­quitas in verbis meis scili es, Merc. notes, simply to deny; and some translate it here, for a plaine deniall, rather than a forbidding, Not as we, Let it not be iniquity; but there shall not be iniquity, that is, in my words, or in that which I shall speake; and we may connect it with the latter part of the vers. my righteousnesse is in it.

Yea, return againe. He advised them to return before, now he doubles his advice, yea return againe. Such repeated doubled speeches in Scripture, note;

First, A vehemency of spirit in the speaker?

Secondly, A necessity of obedience to the thing which is spoken, by the hearer. It is surely a weighty and a necessary point, which is spoken and spoken again. That's a double duty, and calls for double alligence, which we are doubly call'd to, Return I pray you, doe not think that this is a small matter, a businesse of indifferency, return againe. As (Cant. 6. 13.) Return, return, O Shulamite, return, return: There was great necessity for the Shulamite, to return, when he was so often cried after to return. So, Rejoyce, and [Page 556] againe I say, reioyce, said the Apostle, to note the vehemency of his spirit, and the necessity of that Gospel-duty, or how exceeding becomming it is, for Christans to walk cheerfully and rejoyce. Here then, Return, yea return againe, is, as if he had said, there is great cause you should return, and be better advised, that, you should consider otherwise of my case, than hitherto you have done;

My righteousnesse is in it. That is, I am righteous in this mat­ter, in this businesse: or upon such a further consideration and re­turning to the quistion, my righteousnesse, (by a true stating of these differences) will appeare unto you. Job was no Justi­ciary, no boaster in or of his own righteousnesse; but he speakes of the righteousnesse of his cause, and of the uprightnesse of his conscience. According to that of (Psal. 73. ver. 6.) Thy righ­teousnesse shall appeare as the light, that is, the righteousnesse of thy cause: so saith Job, my righteousnesse is in it, when you return and return again, to consider diligently and seriously of this businesse, you will finde the result of all will be, that my righ­teousnesse is in it, that is, that I am in the right, or free from blame in this businesse, that I have not broken the rules of justice, or depar­ted from a good conscience.

Further, Others conceive Job bespeakes his friends in this quicke language; Return, yea return again, to recall his Forte in dignae­bundi discessum papabane-aut jā surrexer [...]nt discessuri, quae­re illos invitat ad promoven [...]ā disputationem, Pined. friends, who were ready to goe away in a pett or in a fume, as we use to say; They were rising to be gone and Job hastily calls them back, Return, I pray return; As a man in discourse growing so hot, that the house cannot hold him, but he will breake away, is usually re-invited, pray stay, sir, return again; so Job, re­turn againe, my righteousnesse is in it, you shall see I mill make the matter good.

Hence observe, first, (taking the rerurn in a Metaphoricall sence.)

That a passionate or inconsiderate man, goes from hemself, and from the matter. Passion carries from the businesse before us. An angry mans discourse runs wild, he had need be reduced. Consi­deration is the returning of a man unto himself, or his comming home. As the passions of the concupiscible appetite, and intem­perancies of youth, carrie a man beyond his boundes (and there­fore the Prodigall repenting, is said to come to himself, Luk. 15. 17.) so likewise do the passions of the irascible appetite. Anger dis­orders and discomposes the spirit, as much as luxury.

Secondly, observe,

To persist in evill is worse than the committing if evill. The one is common to man, the other peculiar to the Devill, and his peculiars, who know no repentance. It is bad enough to doe ill, but not to returne from evill, is inexcusable; therefore the Lord, often by his Prophets laies this, as the heaviest charge of all, upon his people. He taxes them with their departures from him: But especially with their refusals to returne unto him, Yet have ye not returned unto me; this is more sinfull than all the sins you have committed, you have not returned, you goe on and persevere in evill. The sword of God proclaimes alike voice in our eares at this day, Return, return again. We have departed and gone away from God, let us not draw that ancient change upon our selves, I have smitten you, yet have ye not returned unto me. It is not sinning, but not returning, which brings finall condemna­tion, impenitency seales the stone of destruction upon Persons, and Nations.

Thirdly, whereas these words, Returne, let it not be iniquity, are referred to Jobs friends, as if he had said, Let not this your pas­sion make your sinne fouler and greater; you have sinned al­ready, but if you returne not, your sin will be iniquity shortly, Note,

He stops his sin from b [...]ing an iniquity, who hastens his returning from sin.

Every sin, the least sin, is sin, as the least drop of water, is wa­ter: but every sin (in a strict sence) is not iniquity. The nature is the same, but the degree varies. As many a child never comes to be a man; so many a sin comes not to be an iniquity. Happy [...]s he that taketh those little ones, and dasheth them against the stones. That returnes before his sin be iniquity.

Fourthly, observe further, how Job cals upon his friends, when he sees them transported (as he thought) with passion; he leaves complaining of his owne sorrowes, and gives them good counsell; he, for that present forgets his owne ruines, that he might amend them.

It is our duty to reclaime, and to appease those by gentle intrea­ties, who, we suppose, have wronged us, or gone astray from truth.

Job doth not raile upon or revile his friends, but beseeches them, to be better advised, and consider what they did.

Fifthly, in that he saith, Return, yea return again, taking this [Page 558] for a call to a more serious consideration of the businesse, we may note,

That a mans cause and condition must be considered, and consi­dered again, twice, that is, fully considered, before he be con­demned. We must give account of every idle word, much more then of every unjust sentence or censure: It is but wisdome to consider that strictly, about which we must give so strict an account.

Sixthly, in that he saith, My righteousnesse is in it. Ob­serve,

That a good cause, the more it is searched into, the better it will appeare; the deeper you digge into it, the more truth and holinesse you will finde in it. Search a godly man, and the lower you goe, the better he proves; the nearer you come to his heart, the richer treasures of grace and uprightnesse will be discovered. at his tongue, or, his lips may be gilded over with good words, but Whereas take an hypocrite, and you may have a little good mettal, search him to the bottome, and there is all rottennesse, even seven abominations at his heart. A godly man is not gilded, but gold. Search a Job quite through, try him to the center, righteousnesse is in all his wayes, the further you search, the better he is, and he will be best of all, at last.

Vers 30. Is there iniquity in my tongue? Gannot my taste dis­cerne perverse things.
Formula est seip­sum compellantis & animum su­um scrutantis, facta examinan­tis, Coc Verbaper stulti­tiam & temeri­tatem prolata la­tentis pravitatis indices.

Thus he concludes his Directory to his friends, and his preparatory for what himself intended to pursue in the next Chapter, Is there in­iquity in my tongue? doth my tongue speak unequall, or evil things? Hath any thing bin spoken by me against common right, or against the divine rule? hath my tongue uttered any iniquity from my heart, Hath the sinfulnesse of my heart broken forth at my lips? Or hath it appeared, that I have done wickedly by what I have said? When my words are duly weighed, I shall not appeare the man you make mee.

The word signifies calamity or misery, as well as iniquity, and so we may take it here, Is there calamity in my tongue? That is, do my words bespeake or invite my afflictions. We finde the word used in that sence, Psal. 52. 2. Thy tongue deviseth mischiefe, or calamity; Iniquity devised or framed by the tongue is often a scourge upon the back, Micha 7. 3. the great man uttereth his [Page 559] mischievous desire; The mischievous evill words of his soule. Is there, (saith Job) any such mischievous device in my tongue? Dober Havoth Naphshi. Have I spoken poison to infect you: or blasphemie to dishonour God.

Cannot my taste discerne perverse things?

Cannot my taste?] The Hebrews is, Cannot my pallate? And [...] Palatum, ele­ganti Metapho­ra, a sensibus externis, ad in­teriores transla­ta, appellat illam animae faculta­tem, qua justa ab injustis, vera â falsis, & aequa ac recta, ab ini­quis & perver­sis dignoscun­tur, nonsecus ac palato cibi dul­ces ab amaris, &c. Merc. Habet & ani­ma suum pala­tum. because the pallate is exquisite in tasting, therefore by a trope the organ is expressed for the act, Cannot my taste discern, cannot my pallate, Or as others, Cannot my mouth discern perverse things? That faculty of the soule, whereby we discerne or distinguish just from unjust, truth from false-hood, as sweet is distinguish­ed from bitter, by the pallate, is elegantly called the pallate of the soul.

Cannot my taste discern? The Hebrew is, Cannot my taste [...] Scriptura saepe linguae, faucibus manibus, tri­buit, quod men. tis & intellectus proprium est, sc. med tari & in­telligere. Magna est rati­onis & orationis cognatio. under­stand perverse things? It is usuall in Scripture to ascribe understan­ding, not onely to the senses, but also to the tongue, and sometimes to the hand. Understanding is ascribed to the tongue, in the place before named: Psal. 52. where the tongue is said, to de vise mis­chiefe; The tongue, properly, cannot devise, the tongue doth but utter mischiefe, it is the mind or heart that deviseth. The shop is within, where mischiefe is forged and framed, yet the contrivance of it, is in that text given to the tongue. There is a two-fold rea­son of it, why the holy Ghost attributes the worke of the under­standing to the tongue, hand or senses,

First, there is a great affinity, beween reason and speech, and therefore the tongue, which is the instrument of speech, is honoured with the worke of the understanding: And so grat is the affinity beween reason and speech, that no creature void of reason can speak; Speech is a peculiar property of the rationall creature, Speech is or ought to be the immediate issue or birth of reason. Words are conceived in the mind, and born at the tongue. And words are the image of the mind. We may see what work is wrought in the mind, by that which is spoken by the tongue. The shape of a mans heart (when he speakes himself) comes out at his mouth. And therefore before a man speakes, he meditates. Me­ditation is the conception of words. As speaking is the production of them. Thus the Lord charges Joshua (Chap. 1. 8.) The book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth, but thou shalt medi­tate therein day and night: One would think, it should rather [Page 560] have been said, The book of the Law shall not depart out of thine heart, but thou shalt meditate therein, or if, not cut of thy mouth, then Ita meditaberis ut exipsa cogi­tatione mentis effervescente redundent, & ebulliant in ore verba. thou shalt speak of it. Meditation is too high a worke for the mouth, Yet, because there ought to be much meditation about the Law of God, before a word of it comes out of the mouth, there­fore the Lord saith, The book of the Law shall not depart out of thy mouth, but thou shalt meditate therein day and night; that is, as oft as thou shalt speak, thou shalt meditate, thou shalt not speake rashly, it shall not be the work of thy tongue alone, but of thy mind and tongue together.

There is a second reason, why, acts of the understanding are a­scribed to the tongue, or to the senses; because when a thing is well spoken, or duly acted by any sense, Reason is the guide and the bodily Organ is under the dictates of the minde or understanding. So Gen. 41. 14. when old Jacob in giving the blessing unto Josephs children, Manasseh and Ephraim, laid his right hand upon the younger, and his left hand upon the elder, the text saith, he made his hands to understand, we translate, he guided his hands witting­ly; there was so much reason, such divine reason in that act of Ja­cobs hands, in laying his right-hand upon the younger, that the Prudenter egit manibus sun, ac siiplae manus mysteriorum consciae erant. Onkel. Hebrew gives it with this elegancie, he made his hands to under­stand; which one of the Jewish Writers, learnedly expounds thus, He order'd his hands wisely, as if they had been made acquainted with that great mystery of Gods counsels, that the greater blessing was the portion of the younger sonne. And so the Psalmist (Psal. 78 72. speaking of Davids raigne and government saith, He go­verned them by the skilfulnesse of his hands. The Hebrew is, by the understanding of his hands; and more, the understandings of [...] In intelligentiis manuum, vel vol [...]rum. his hands. Or, as one renders it, The discretions of his hands, or the prudency of his Palmes, ascribing all kind of politicall know­ledge and understanding unto David. David in the outward ad­ministrations of the kingdome, acted with so much reason and ju­stice, that his very hands are said to understand; His hands under­stood more than the heads of other Princes. As Davids hands, so Jobs pallate or taite, had an understanding, Cannot my pallate un­derstand?

Yet further, it is frequent in Scripture metaphorically to trans­late things, which are only acted or apprehended by the inward senses, to the outward. Taste, properly, is of meat and drink; the humour or moisture, which is in meats, sutable to the salivall [Page 561] humour in the mouth, causeth pleasantness of taste. Here Job speaks of Doctrines, or of actions, Cannot my taste discerne perverse things? If a thing be perversly or properly, truely or falsely spoken, cannot I taste it quickly? And hence the word of God is compared to those things, which are the object of taste, as to milk, and to strong meat, 1 Cor. 3. 2. I (saith the Apo­stle) have fed you with milk, and not with meat; That is, with easie and common truths, not with the more mysterious parts of Gospel-knowledge, because ye were not able to bear it. The taste of such mysteries was too strong for your pallates. The same Metaphor is enlarged by the Apostle, Heb. 5. 12, 13, 14. And in this Book we find it more than once, Doth not the eare trie words, and the mouth taste his meat? (Job 12. 11. Chap. 34. 3.) That is, doth not the eare try words, as the mouth tastes meat? Cannot my taste discern

Perverse things?

That is, words ill spoken, or wrong placed. The word signi­fies [...] also, any calamity, or sad accident. And so Mr. Broughton renders it. Cannot my pallate declare all kind of heavy sor­rowes? Do ye think I have lost my judgment of things, and that I cannot tell, when I am pinch't or pain'd.

First, in that he saith here, Is there iniquity in my tongue? Observe,

The tongue oft-times discovers the iniquity of the heart.

If there be iniquity in the heart, it will one time or other break forth at, and blister upon the tongue. He that is rot­ten at his heart, is commonly rotten in his talk, Matth. 12. 34. Out of the aboundance of the heart, the mouth speakes. And when there is aboundance of iniquity in the heart, there is seldome a dearth or scarcity of it in the mouth: especially in times of trouble, that iniquity and corruption, that disease and plague of the heart, will break forth at the lips. As, Evill words corrupt good manners; So evil words discover, that our manners are corrupt. There are few men, but as the Damosel spake to Peter, Their speech bewrayeth them, and you may smell the filth of their hearts by their breath. Secondly, observe from these words, Is there iniquity in my tongue?

He whose heart is upright, may know that he is upright.

When Job questions, Is there iniquity in my tongue? He [Page 562] resolves; There is no iniquity in my tongue; None of that iniquity, which you charge me with. I grant a believer hath not alwaies a sight of his own integrity and uprightness, many a soule bears false witness against himself, and oppresses his owne innocency: yet for the most part, sincerity hath a witness in it self, and holiness carries a light by which it is seen to him that hath it. An upright heart may know his own uprightness.

Thirdly, in that Job is thus stiff, in maintaining his own up­rightness, and in denying any iniquity to be in his tongue, Ob­serve;

It is a duty to maintain our own integrity and upright­ness.

Job was upon it before, and is now upon it again, and he will be upon it afterward, he never gives over justifying of himself a­gainst man, though he had not a word to plead for himself against God.

Fourthly, from the latter clause, Cannot my taste discern per­verse things? Observe;

Reason distinguishes truth from falshood, as the pallate distin­guishes bitter from sweet. Reason it is the souls-taster. Princes have their tasters before they eat, least there should be poison in the dish. God hath given unto man a taster for his spiritual meat. The Pope will not suffer the meat he provides and cooks to be ta­sted, but will have it swallowed whole, or else he will thrust it whole down their throats. It is alike spiritual tyranny, to starve souls, and to cram them. It is our duty, when meat is set before us, & we are at a full table of knowledg, where variety of doctrins and opinions are served in, then to call for our taster. We may be surfetted else, if not poison'd. There may be a wild guord among good hearbs in the pot, and so death in the pot too, therefore first taste, then eat and digest. A Christian hath a taste to discern error from truth; why then should he be denied the use of it? A woe is pronounced against those, who offer unwholsome doctrin, Isa. 5. 20 Wo to those that call evil good, & good evil, that put light for dark­ness and darkness for light, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter. A like wo is due to them, who will not give others leave to discern for themselves, what is good or evil, light or darkness, bit­ter or sweet; as good let another live for us, as another taste for us. And their misery will be little less, then the woes of these men, who cannot or will not take pains to distinguish, when evill is [Page 563] called good and good evil, when light is put for darkness, and darkness for light, when bitter is put for sweet, and sweet for bit­ter, or (as Job speaks here) whose taste cannot discern perverse things. There are some whose taste is so far from discerning per­verse things, that it is easie to discern, their taste is perverse; for, bring them wholesome, true and savoury doctrine, they say it is bitter, or false doctrine; Bring them false doctrin, a lie, a dream a fancie, a meer humane invention, dish out such provision before them, that's excellent chear. This was the heaviest curse, which God sent upon the Gentiles, Rom. 1. 28. God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things, which are not convenient, that is, to a mind void of judgement, a mind that could not taste or distinguish things, therfore the issue or effect was, They did things which were not convenient; as if a man not being able to judge of meats, eats poyson, or meats most contrary to his health and con­stitution. It is a fearful judgement to be given up to an unappro­ving mind, to a mind that cannot discern truth from false-hood, the Oracles of God, from the forgeries of men, superstition, from holy worship. It is a sad thing to loose our spiritual senses. Such as play the wantons with the word of God, and walk below the truths they know, are at last given up to a reprobate mind, to a mind not able to know the word of truth, and then they swallow down error for truth, and suck in deadly poison, like sweet plea­sant wine. The Apostle speaking of the difference of doctrins, un­der the metaphor of meats, saith, Milk is for babes, but strong meat is for them of full age, even for those, that by reason of use, have their senses exercised to discern good and evil; That is, their spiritual senses exercised to taste this, from that doctrin, and not to swallow every doctrin alike. It is a great blessing, when a peo­ple have senses exercised; And it is a blessing we have much cause to pray for, in these times. That many pallats are out of taste, is too apparent by the multitude of heterodox opinions, which go down without disrelish. Some, which would even make a man tremble to name them, are entertained with delight. Some, which dissolve our comforts, and breaks us off from comfortable commu­nion with Christ: Some, which shake, if not overthrow the very foundations of faith, are swallowed, as pleasant morsels. Doth not this convince, that there's a want of Jobs taste among us, to dis­cern perverse things. Therefore get your senses exercised, be esta­blished in the present truth, that, ye, as this holy man in the middest [Page 564] of all bodily distempers, and outward troubles (which usually put the natural pallate out of taste) may yet even then, as he, have your inward senses exquisite, and your spiritual pallate exact to discern right from perverse things. Lastly, note,

False doctrine, or true doctrine falsely applied is a perverse thing.

False doctrin perverts, First, Reason; Secondly, Scripture; Thirdly, the souls of men. The Apostle (Acts 20. 30.) pro­phecies to the Church of Ephesus, and with them to all Chur­ches, That out of themselves men should arise, speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them. Holy doctrin draws men to God, and false doctrine draws men to man. As itching ears heap teachers to themselves (2 Tim. 4. 3.) So false tongues heap disciples to themselves. That which is perverse in it's na­ture, is perverting in its effect.

JOB Chap. 7. Vers. 1, 2, 3, 4.

Is there not an appointed time to man upon earth? are not his dayes also like the dayes of an hireling?

As a servant earnestly desireth the shadow, and as an hireling looketh for the reward of his work:

So am I made to possess moneths of vanity; and wearisome nights are appointed to me.

When I lie down, I say, When shall I arise, and the night be gone? and I'am full of tossings too and fro, unto the dawn­ing of the day.

WHere the knot of connection, between this and the for­mer Chapter lyeth, is not so discernable; which hath given occasion for much diversity of conjecture about it.

First, It may be conceived, that Job in his discourse, refutes that tenet of Eliphaz, that, he was punished and scourged for his wickedness: by shewing, that to be afflicted is the common condition of man, and therefore no such judgement of any mans wickednesse or sinfulness could be made from his afflictions. Or,

Secondly, That Job here confutes that promise, which Eliphaz made about the twentieth verse of the fifth Chapter, concerning outward prosperity, He shall know that his tabernacle shall be in peace, and he shall be delivered, &c. by proving it inconsistent with the present estate of mortals, to look for such uninterrupted happiness, or fair dayes without any clouds and stormes, as Eli­phaz seemed to undertake he should, Is there not an appointed time to man upon earth? are not his dayes also like the dayes of an hireling, &c.

Or thirdly, the connection may be made with these words, which himself had spoken at the four and twentieth verse of the former Chapter, Teach me (saith Job) and I will hold my tongue, and cause me to understand wherein I have erred: In which words we shewed, Job makes an humble submission of himself; and in case his friends could instruct him better, he was willing to learn, he was not wedded to his own opinion, or resolved never to be removed from it,

In pursuance of which promised teacheablness, he in this Chap­ter grants what was grantable in the former discourse of Eliphaz. Eliphaz had said, Chap. 5. ver. 7, & 8. That man was born to labour as the sparks fly upward, and thereupon presently inferres, I would seek unto God, &c. both these, the Doctrin and the Ʋse, Job seems to prosecute in this seventh Chapter, as if he should say, what thou hast rightly spoken, I will grant thee; thou hast said, Man is born to trouble, I say so too, Is there not an appoin­ted time unto man (of trouble?) and are not his daies as the daies of an hireling? And thou advisest me to seek unto God, and apply my self to him; it is good counsel, and therefore I will follow it: As we read he doth, at the seventeenth and twentieth verses of this Chapter, O remember that my life is wind, what is man that thou shouldest magnifie him; I have sinned, what shall I do unto thee, O thou preserver of men? Why doest thou not par­non my transgression, and take away mine iniquity? Language full of humility, and sounding out the brokenness of his heart.

But lastly, rather thus, Job having in the former Chapter refu­ted those arguments, by which Eliphaz would convince him, and having renewed his request to die, expostulated with his friends about their unkindness toward him, and admonished them to a more equal dealing with, and hearing of him: he now proceeds to the confirmation of his first request to die, which he doth from divers grounds.

1. From the general condition of mans life, vers. 1. Is there not an appointed time to man, &c.

2. From the condition of some particular men, A servant earnestly desireth the shadow, and an hireling looketh for the re­ward of his work, may not I therefore desire death, which one­ly will be a shadow to me, till when, I shall not have my reward? And,

3. From his own special condition at the third verse, and so for­ward [Page 567] to the seventh, therein expressing how sad, how restless, how troublesome his life was to him, which (as he apprehended) nothing could give remedy to, but onely death: My disease ap­pears curable, only by a grave, and my only medicine, is a mouth full of earth: Therefore the matter standing so with me, have I not rightly and reasonably desired, either that I had not lived at all, or that I may quickly die, and that God would cut off my life.

Having by these arguments confirmed that former desire; In the next place, he again renews his former complaints from the eleventh verse of this Chapter, unto the seventeenth. Thirdly, he abases himself before God, as unworthy, that God should take any notice of him, or bestow a thought, a visit, a smile, or a chastise­ment upon him. What is man, that thou doest magnifie him? that thou doest visit him, &c? Lastly, he concludes with confessi­on of his sin, and earnest desire of pardon, at the twentieth and the one and twentieth verses.

Thus in general, both for the dependance of the latter part of his speech upon the former, and the principal parts contained in this.

Verse 1. Is there not an appointed time to man upon earth? and are not his daies also like the daies of an hireling.

The question affirms, there is an appointed time to man upon earth, and his daies are like the daies of an hireling. From whence, we may form his argument thus. He that hath a certain terme of life appointed him, to serve in, doth not sin in desiring an end of his service: But there is an appointed time, &c. Therefore it is not sinful to desire it.

Is there not an appointed time?] The Hebrew thus; Is there [...] Militia, per Metaphoram, tempus ordina­tum, determi­natum, constitu­tum: ipsum [...]i­lit [...]ae tempus. not a warfare to man upon earth? So you find it in the margin of your Bibles: Our Translators put warfare there, and Appointed time in the text. The word signifies both, because warres of all other actions, have their seasons, and their appointed times; and the life of man is well described under both, or either of those notions.

Consider it first under the most proper signification, and so ma­ny read it, Is there not a warfare to man upon the earth? Isa. 40. 1, 2. Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith the Lord, speake comfortably to Jerusalem; Why? Tell her, her warfare is ended. [Page 568] In that place our translators put appointed time, in the margin, and, warfare, in the text, as here they put, appointed time, in the text, and warfare, in the margin; The sence in both is the same. Tell her that her warfare is ended, that is, the time appointed or constitued for her trouble is ended: So here, Is there not an ap­pointed time? that is, is there not a set, determined time of the troubles, or troublesome warfaring life of man?

The Greek Translators interpret it, Temptation, Is there not an Graeci [...], quasi tentationis offici­nam ubi homo varia experia­tur varij (que) e­ventis & peri­culis sit exposi­tus, ut miles in bello. appointed temptation to man upon the earth? And that gives us the same meaning; for temptation is a warfare; temptation is our spiritual warre, the exercise and probation of a Christian. There are three things in which the greatest exercise of a Christian life consists, Prayer, Meditation, and Temptation. First Prayer, wherein man, is seeking unto, and working his heart towards God: Secondly, Meditation, wherein he is preparing himself, by holy thoughts and divine considerations, for his nearer addresses unto God in prayer, and how to walk in every duty towards man: Thirdly, Temptation, wherein he wrastles and strives with those enemies opposing Prayer, Meditation, and the whole course of holy obedience. The life of man is a continued temptation, and that's a spiritual warfare, a continual bickering with a world of ene­mies; And though they without stand still, yet a soul can scarce passe one hour, but he shall have many fights and bouts with his own heart. In this sence, Is there not an appointed time of war­fare or temptation to man upon earth?

Our life is a warfare in divers respects.

First, it is a warfare, because Christians do or ought, to live un­der the greatest command of any in the world; they ought to stand armed at a call. A Souldier is under absolute command, he must not dispute the Orders of his General, but obey them; The Centurian in the Gospel saith, I have Souldiers under me, and I say to one go and he goeth, to another come and he cometh; and to a third do this and he doth it: which he speaks not as com­mending the special vertue and good disposition of his own Soul­diers, but as describing the duty of all Souldiers: therefore Soul­diary is well defined, To be the obedience of a stout and valiant mind, Militia est obe­dientia quadam fortis & invi­cti, animi ar­bitrio carentis suo. out of his own dispose; A Souldier moves upon direction; so must a Christian, he is in a warfaring condition, he must have a charge or a word from his Commander, for every step he treads, or action he undertakes.

Secondly it is a warfare, in regard of perpetuall motions and travels: A Souldiers life is an unsetled life; while he is in actuall service, he hath no rest, he is either marching, or charging; and when he comes in his quarters, his stay is but little, he cannot build him a house, he can but pitch him down a tent for a night or two; he must away againe. Mans life hath no stop, we have here no abi­ding City, we dwell in tents and tabernacles, waifaring and warfa­ring out our dayes.

Thirdly, a warfare, because of continual watching. It is the watch­word which Christ gave his followers, I say unto you, watch; that's the souldiers word and work too; warring and watching goe together: The Souldier stands Centinel, fearing the enemies surprise: A Christian should stand upon his guard and his watch at all hours, is not that a warfare?

Fourthly, a warfare, because Christians ought to keep their rank and file, that is, the places and relations wherein God hath set them. A Souldier commanded to stand such a ground, must not stirre, though he die for it, and if he stirs (by Martial law) he shall die. There is so much keeping of order in warre and Battels, that whatsoever keeps order, is said to fight, or warre. The Sarres are said to have fought against Sisera in their courses, Judg. 5. 20. The Stars are embattaild or encampt in their sphears, out of which they move not, and are therefore often called the Militia, or host of Heaven.

Fifthly, a warfare, because so full of hazzards, troubles and la­bours, or because so much hardship is to be endured. A Souldier converses with dangers, and dwels in the territories of death con­tinually: This caused Deborah to begin her Triumphant Song, with praise to the Lord, because the people offered themselves wil­lingly. Many are forc'd and press'd to the warrs; and most who are not press'd by the Authority of others, are press'd by their own hopes of gaine, or desire of vain-glory and renown. A true Vo­luntiere in warre; is a rare man: There is so much danger in it, that there is seldome much of the will in it.

The whole life of man, is full either of visible or invisible dangers; he passes the pikes every day. The Apostle reckons eight distinct perlis in one verse, which met him, which way soever he turned, 2 Cor. 11. 26. He was in deaths often. And though there are but few such Heroes as he, yet 'tis seldome, but any of us are in deaths: Especially while we remember, the mighty spirituall enemies and [Page 570] oppositions which encompasse and beset us every day. We wrastle not with flesh and blood but with principalities and powers, &c. And are therefore advised to take to us the whole armour of God; never to stir without our sword.

Sixthly a warfare, in regard of the issue; victory and triumph, or slavery and death, is the issue of our lives. Either we overcome and are more then conquerours (that's the Apostles language, Rom. 8.) or else we are conquered, and more then captives; that's the Apostles sence too (both in allusion) They are taken captive by the Devill at his will: To be led captive by the Devill, is the lowest captivity, lower then any captivity unto men. In reference to 2. Tim. 2. 26. the spirituall part of our warfare, there's no comming off upon equall rermes: We must be victors or slaves, conquer or die. Only this is the Saints assurance, that as the Captaine of their salvation was made perfect by sufferings, and conquer'd by dying, so (at the worst) shall they; spirituall death (as sinners) hath no power over them at all, and when they die (as men) naturall, or by men violent­ly, they shall receive fuller power: Thus our life is a warfare upon earth.

But take the word as we translate, for an appointed time; Is there not an appointed time to man upon the earth? And the reason why it beares that sence, is grounded upon these two things.

1. Because there is a speciall season of the yeare, most fit and Non significat tempus simpli­citer, sed tem­pus certum ac constitutum, ea analogia quod determinato anni tempore exerceri solet militia. Militia ideo tempus deter­minatum dici­tur, quia non quae vis aetas bello apta est, sed determina­ta & certa. sutable for warre, 2 Sam. 11. 1. And it came to passe at the return of the yeare, when Kings go forth to battell. The time for war, is such a known appointed season, that the same word sig­nifies, warfare, and any appointed season.

2. Because men go out to war, at a speciall time of their age: There is an appointed setled time of mans life, wherein he is fit to beare arms: Every age is not fit for arms. Old men and chil­dren are not fit for the field: Hence we finde, Numbers the first, throughout, that the muster of the children of Israel is thus made, ver. 3, 20, 22, &c. From twenty yeares old and upward; all that are able to goe forth to warre. The Roman and Greek histories are distinct in this; In some Common-wealths, from Fifteen to Fifty, in others, from Twenty to Sixty: and in ours, the appoin­ted time is, between Sixteen & Sixty, so men are press'd and listed for war; And because there is such an appointed, or a set time of life in all States to goe out to war, therefore, that word is [Page 571] elegantly applied, to signifie a set or an appointed time for any bu­sinesse.

Is there not an appointed time to man upon earth?

Ʋpon earth: In Heaven our time knows no bounds, there are no termes or distinctions in eternity; Seasons and variety of times va­nish and shall not be heard of in Heaven. Eterenity is time fixt. But there is an appointed time.

To man upon earth. The word is Enosh, miserable, weake, fraile man, is there not an appointed time to this man upon earth? that is, while he walks in this lower region of the world, and lives on mould. The summe of all may be thus conceived, as if Job had said: Singulis dich [...] sua certaminae praesto sunt, adeo non nisi cum ipso vitae terminautor labores vitae, ac proinde se. cu [...]dum natu­ram finem vi­tae expeto, Jun. Every day hath evill annexed, some affliction or other waites upon every houre, so that there is no period of mans sorrow, but the period of his life; and therefore I walk by the rule of sound reason, when, that I might see an end of my trouble, I call for the end of my daies. Observe hence, first,

The life of man, is measured out by the will of God. Is there not an appointed time to man upon earth? There is. As God hath set out bounds and limits to the sea (Hitherto thou shalt come, and no further) by a perpetuall decree; so, he hath also set out bounds and limits to the life of man, his life it is an appointed time: Thus far the line of thy life shall reach, and no further. We live not at adven­tures, neither can our care lengthen out our own dayes: As all our care cannot adde one cubit to our stature, so not one minute to our glasse or houre. And as we cannot lengthen, so we cannot shorten our own dayes in respect of this appointed time: They who die in a time, when God forbids; yet die when God appoints: And they live [...]ut all Gods time, who wickedly shorten their owne: They cut their thread of life, but they cannot cut the thread of Gods de­cree; we live not at our own will, but at the will of God; we are tenants at his will, in these houses of clay. He is the maker of time, and the measurer of our dayes; he gives us the lease of our lives for what yeares, he pleases; and it is most fit that he who created time, should dispose of time. God is the Lord of time, and farmes it out, as, and to whom he thinks good. Christ might doe what he pleased upon the Sabbath, for (saith he) the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath; God is the Lord of time, and therefore hath power to appoint, to one more, to another lesse. My times (saith David) are in thy hand, Psal. 31. 15. Thou mayest lengthen or [Page 572] shorten, continue or break them off, as thy pleasure is.

Some live as if they were masters of time, and could appoint out their own term: as if they lived at their own discretion, and could make a covenant with the grave, and agree with death, when to come for them. They article with it, for this yeare, and the next; rhey say to the grave, thou shalt not take me yet, thou shalt spare me yet, I have such ends to drive, such pleasures to take, before I would die. They (Isa. 56. 12.) speak, as if their tongues and their time were their own, and they knew no Lord of either; To morrow shall be as this day, and much more aboundant; they speak of the next day, as if they could command it, and bid it come to serve their lusts. That wretched rich man, Lu. 12. could say, soul take thine ease, thou hast goods laid up for many yeares; see how liberall he is to his soule, out of anothers right; and because he had got a great stock of ri­ches, he gives himself a rich stock of time, many yeares. He re­solved to make his life larger, as he had done his barns; and be­cause they were full of corne, he also will be full of dayes, whereas the word came, Thou foole, this night shall thy soule be taken from thee. And he could not live till next morning, who resolved upon many yeares, to live. Secondly observe,

That the decrees of God concerning our lives, must not lessen our care to preserve our lives. Is their not an appointed time to Non in absur­dum trabenda est haec Iobi sententia, ut te­mere se quis­piam periculis objiciat, quia spatium vitae definitum est. man upon earth? Yes, that there is, man lives at Gods appoint­ment; but he must not live upon that appointment, that is, with­draw himself from meanes of his preservation, and say, God hath appointed how long I shall live, therefore what need I take care how to live? or what need I take care for the preserving of my life? As it is in spirituals, so also in temporals. God hath deter­mined and appointed the portion of every man, all comes under a decree, under an everlasting and unmoveable decree; yet the decree which is past concerning us, must not take us from our care about our selves. Though only the elect are saved, yet none are saved by their election; Infants who attaine not the use of reason, much lesse the actings of grace, yet are not saved barely by election; what they cannot doe, is done for them, they are saved as elect in Christ, not precisely as elect: how, they are united to Christ, we know not, but we know they must be united, or else they could not be saved. But they who grow in yeares, must also grow in the graces of sanctification, otherwise they are not saved by the grace of election: The decree of God appoints us to salvation, but [Page 573] the decree of God doth not save us; we must runne through all the second causes, and wayes which the word of God hath chalked out to eternal life and glory. Thus also our temporall life, passeth under a decree, it is by appointment: but woe unto those that shall say, God hath appointed how long I shall live, therefore what need I take care about my life? This is to walk contrary to one part of the decree, while we seeme to submit unto the other. For God who appoints life, appoints all the means which concerne the preservation of life. It hath no shadow of a warrant, for any man to cast himself upon needlesse dangers, or to forbear necessa­ry helps for the sustaining of his life, because he heares his time is appointed, and that his dayes one earth, are all reckoned and num­bred to him, from Heaven.

Thirdly, for as much as there is an appointed time, we should learne patience, and wait quietly upon God. It is not in creatures (be they never so angry) to prolong the time of our sorrows. The same word, which shews us, that our life is a warfare, shews us also, that it is an appointed time. Men cannot appoint you one moments trouble, or lengthen this warre, when God will shorten it. Our haires are numbred much more our daies. Honour God, and have good thoughts of him, for whether your times be faire or foule, calme or stormy, they are appointed times. The whole life of man on earth is ordered in heaven.

Fourthly, if our lives are for an appointed time, we should be willing to die, when God cals. All the time we would live beyond that, is of our own appointment, and we should be willing to live, till God cals, for all that's appointed time. As it is sinfull not to be wil­ling to do (though it be burdensom) what God appoints, so is it like­wise, not to be willing to live what time God appoints, though it [...] Mercendarius a [...] cōduxit. Merce­narius est qui in certum tem­pus condu [...]itur & saepe in die, quem ideo Grae­ci vocant [...]. Sicut in unico die operario, quamdiu lucet sol, no [...] est ulla requies merce­nario constitu­ [...]ā. ita dum luce hujus vitae frui­mur nulla nobis requies expect­auda est. be painfull and troublesome.

And are not his daies, like the daies of an hireling?

An hireling is he, who works a set time, for a set reward; And so this latter clause of the verse is the same in sence with the former, Is there not an appointed time to man, and are not his daies, like the daies of an hireling? That is, are not his daies set, as an hireling, with whome we agree for so many daies, or for such a day.

An hireling.] We may take him either for a hired souldier, a mercenary in warre, or for an hired servant, a mercenary in work. An hireling in either notion is called to labour, sorrow and sweat; [Page 574] Such is the common condition of man, His daies, are as the daies of an bireling. God threatneth Moab by the Prophet, in this lan­guage (Isa. 16. 14.) Within three yeares, as the years of an hire­ling, and the glory of Moab shall be contemned; that is, within three years, which shall be like the years of an hireling, trouble­some years, laborious years, vexatious yeares, wearisome yeares, and then the glory of Moab shall be contemned, and utterly despi­sed, As if he had said, Moab is now in great glory, but near great desolation. You shall see three years trouble will staine all the glo­ry of Moab, and wither all her beauty; we feele this truth, Eng­land was a Nation of great glory, you see how two or three years, like the years of an hireling, troublesome years, years of affliction, years of hard labour and travell, have almost spoil'd the glory of it.

And yet here Job makes a generall description of the life of man: It is not the lot only of some poore afflicted, hard-wrought ser­vants, that, their daies are as the daies of an hireling: he speakes of man-kind, of the master, as well as of the servant, His daies are like the daies of an hireling. We may note from it, First, That,

Except we labour we ought not to eat; For the dayes of man, are as the daies of an hireling, the hireling shall not have his meat, except he worke for it, neither ought he that hires, or sets him a worke. The master is in this sence an hireling. The Saints are (in this sence) Hirelings. The Apostle speakes to believers, and reproves them (2 Thess. 3. 12.) There are some which walke among you inordinately, working not at all, now them that are such, we command, that they work and eat their own bread, and ver. 10. If any man work not, let him not eat; even they, whom Christ hath made free, are to account themselves, as hired servants, that is, they must not eat the bread of idlenesse; we steale all the bread, which (one way or other) we labour not for, and therefore the Apostle bids the Thessalonians work, that, they might eat their own bread; It is not our own bread, which we buy with our mony, unlesse we pay (in what we can, and are called to) labour for it also. As we eat that bread plea­santly, so we come by it honestly, which is dipt in our owne sweat.

Secondly, we are hence taught; That,

We ought to take our travels well, we must not murmur at our labours, or complain over our work, and say, what a wearinesse is it.

As the Lord cannot bear it, that any should murmur at spirituall worke, or say with them in the Prophet, What a wearinesse is it; so it is very displeasing to him, to say of our callings and the burdens of them, What a wearinesse are they? Why? It is the common condition of man: Why then should we quarrel with that law of labour, which is become the portion of our mortality. The cor­ruption of our nature hath led us into this condition, and made us all as hirelings. Mans innocency had businesse, but sin hath brought him to sweat, and changed his labour into toile. Man was put in­to the garden, as Lord of it, to dresse and till it, but now he is put there, as an hireling, to sweat and toyle at it. There is a stampe of servility and drudgery upon all the labours, which the children of men take under the Sun. That argument, which the Apostle uses, to support us, in the bitternesse of affliction, hath alike strength in it to comfort us in the toile somenesse of our labours. As there is no temptation hath taken hold of us, but that which is common to man, 1 Cor. 10. 13. So there is no labour laid upon any of us in our lawfull callings, but that which is common to man. Even the Saints, whom Christ hath made free and separated from the world, are not freed from service, while they are in the world. And while Christ would not have them carefull in any thing, he would have them industrious in every thing. That Canon of the Apostle is clear for it, (1 Cor. 7. 20.) Let every man abide in the same calling, wherein he was called; that is, your spirituall calling doth not void your civill. When you have learned to drive a trade for heaven, you must still drive your trade on earth. While there is a­ny thing of sin in us, there must be somewhat of the hireling in us. There is not the most ingenious, no, nor the most spirituall labour, we goe about, but there is somewhat of the hireling in it; in the duty of prayer, in the duty of preaching, there is somewhat of the hireling, that is, there is bodily paine and wearinesse, a waste up­on our strength, and expence of our spirits. Though in these things the Saints worke not for wages, but their very works is their wa­ges, and their labour their reward, though there be nothing mer­cenary in their spirits, yet they feel the effects of a mercenary worke, upon their bodies, even wearinesse and waste of naturall strength and spirits.

Thirdly, Seeing the daies of a man are as the daies of an hireling. Observe,

There is a reward or wages, somewhat followes the labour and travell [Page 576] of this life. The hireling labours all day, but at night he hath his reward, Mat. 20. Christ compares beleevers, even, in their spirituall capacity, unto labourers in a vineyard, to hirelings, who wrought for a penny a day, and at night, they had every one their pay: It is so in reference to the whole course of this life, we are hirelings; in the evening, we shall have our penny, verily, There is a reward for the righteous, their labour is not in vain in the Lord, 1 Cor. 15. And as the righteous have a reward, so, the wicked shall have wages. Satans hirelings shall have full pay, though no content, for all their works, The wages of sin is death; there's pay, such as it is, woefull pay, a black penny. The daies of man are as the daies of an hireling, there is an issue & a reward for every work

Fourthly, note from the Metaphor, while an hireling is doing his masters work, he doth his owne too, that is, his owne profit comes in by those acts, in which he labours for another. It is thus also in the generall state of man: above all, Christs servants and hirelings, gaine by the duties of obedience they performe to Christ, their own profit comes in, with his honour. A godly man cannot doe a stroake of worke for God, but he works for himself too; the servants of God must not be self-seekers and self-workers, they may not make themselves their end; but as it is with an hireling, let him be never so upright hearted toward the master he serves, let him lay self by, in all he doth, yet he hath a share of profit in all his labors God hath so espoused and married his owne glory, and the good of man together, that, whosoever really promotes the one, pro­motes both. It is so likewise with those, who work the works of darknesse, and doe the lusts of the devill. While his slaves are doing his worke, they are gaining towards destruction, and their owne wages encreases daily, they are treasuring up wrath and judgement against the day of wrath. As the measure of their sinne fils, so doth the measure of their punishment. Thus also the daies of man, are as the daies of an hireling.

There are two generall observations, which I shall but name, be­cause they will occurre again.

1. The life of man, it is short; As the daies of an hireling. The ser­vant doth not abide in the hous for ever, a hireling is but for a time. And it is good for a man; that it is so. some complaine exceeding much, because their lives are so exceeding little. But let them weigh it well, and they shall see cause to rejoyce much, because they live so little. In some respect it is good for wicked men, that their lives are [Page 579] so short: if their lives were longer, they would be wickeder, and so heaping up more sin, they would heap up more wrath against them­selves. And it is very well for the Saints, that their lives are so short. Their corruptions & temptations, their weaknesses and infirmities, their troubles and afflictions are so many, that it is well their dayes are so few. If they should have length of life added to heaps of sorrows, and perpetuity with outward misery, how miserable were they! Christ promises it, as a point of favour to his, that the days of trouble should be shortned, Except those dayes should be short­ned, no flesh should be saved (that is, kept or preserved alive in those tribulations) but for the Elects sakes those dayes shall be shortned, Mat. 24. 22. It is a favour also to the Saints, that their particular dayes are shortned, that their's are but as the dayes of an hireling, for as much as their present dayes are dayes of trouble and travel. The dayes of the best are so full of evil, that it is good, they are no fuller of dayes.

And further, it is good they are so evil, or full of trouble. It is well for wicked men, that their dayes are full of trouble; the sweeter their lives are to them, the sinfuller they are against God. Their outward comforts are but fewel and incouragement to their lusts; and while their lives are calm and quiet, they do but saile more quietly down into that dead sea of everlasting misery. And the Saints have this advantage by the troublesomenesse of their lives, to be kept in continual exercise, and more dependance up­on God; they would love the world too well, and delight in the creature too much, if God did not put bitternesse into their cup.

Job having thus shadowed the state of man, seems to make out his intendment or scope thus. There is no reason why I should be charged so deeply for desiring death; For what is the life of man? Is it not a life full of travel, and of trouble, full of dangers and temptations, is not the time of his life short and set? Is it not a speedy passing time, and yet a firmly appointed time? Why then should not I think the period of my life to be at hand? Why should not I think my appointed time is come; Forasmuch as I have so many evidences and symptoms of death before me, and have heard so many messages and summons to the grave. Death sits upon Plurima mortis imago. my lips, ready to come in, while I am speaking. Death hath taken possession of me already, and seiz'd my port: death is in my face, I am the very picture of death, and images of death stand round [Page 580] about me. Therefore Eliphaz, why should I not call to have my daies summed up, that I may see the end and summe of these trou­bles; Or wherefore wouldest thou stay my complaint against my life, or stop my desire of death, by giving me hopes of many daies, and of a flourishing estate in this world?

That's his first argument, from the general condition of man­kind. Now he proceeds to consider somewhat more special in that condition.

Verse 2. As a servant earnestly desireth the shadow, and as an hireling looketh for the reward of his work.

Verse 3. So am I made to possesse months of vanity, and wearisom nights are appointed to me.

As a servant earnestly desireth.
[...] Traxit aerem ad os per Meta­phoram, inbiavit, ardentur cupiit, qui enim vehe­menter aeliquid cupiunt, prae de­siderii & expe­ctationis magni­tudine ad os rem trabunt seu fre­quentiùs respi­rant.

To desire earnestly, is but one word in the original, it is so full of sence, that we cannot empty it into any one word in our lan­guage. The letter is, As a servant breaths after the shadow: And because a man, that hath an earnest longing desire for a thing, pants, breaths and gasps after it, therefore that word, which sig­nifies to gape and draw in the air pantingly, signifies also to desire, or to desire earnestly, As a servant earnstly desireth,

The shadow.

Some understand it of the night, when the servant comes to rest himself after his labour all the day. Night is but a great shadow.

Secondly, We may take it for the shadow of the day; A servant that is heated in labour abroad in the open field, earnestly desires a shadow, to get under a tree or a bush, a little to refresh himself. Or,

Thirdly, the shadow may be taken for the house: to come in­to a mans house, or under a mans roof, is called a comming un­der his shadow, Gen. 19. 8. Therefore they are come under my shadow, saith Lot to the men of Sodome, that is, under the covert of my roof.

The shadow is used often in Scripture to note protection and mercy, Shadows are substantial mercies, and the promise of a sha­dow [...]bra id signi­ficat quod prote­ [...]endo & custo­ [...]endo ob [...]mbrat is a real favour, Isa. 4. 6. The Church hath a promise under this notion, There shall be a Tabernacle for a shadow in the day [Page 581] time from the heat, Isa. 25. 4. A refuge from the storm, a shadow from the heat. And Isa. 32. 2. The Lord promises that he will be as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land unto his people. And David flies to this shadow for safety. Ʋnder the shadow of thy wings shall be my refuge, till these calamities be over-past, Psal. 57. 1. So Psal. 17. 8. Psal. 91. 1.

So that in these words, As a servant earnestly desireth the sha­dow, Job means that, which is most refreshing and desirable by a servant: And in those Eastern hot Countries, shadows were very refreshing and much desired. Jacob reporting his labours in kee­ping Labans sheep, saith, In the day time I was consumed with heat, or parched with heat. Therefore a servant hath reason to desire the shadow.

And as an hireling looketh for the reward of his work.

There are two things, which a servant or an hireling desires much, Rest and reward; Shadow and pay. When he is hot the shadow refreshes him. And when he is hungry, his pay refreshes him: while his hand is at work in the day, his heart is upon the wages he shall receive at night. Hence the Lord in compassion to servants made a gracious provision for them by a law, Deut. 24. 14, 15. Thou shalt not oppress a hired servant, &c. at his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the Sun go down upon it, for he is poor and setteth his heart upon it, lest he cry against thee to the Lord, and it be sin unto thee.

Job puts the instance in both, As the hireling looks for the re­ward of his work, &c.

He looketh. The word signifieth to expect a thing with an eye [...] toward it, what we earnestly expect, our eyes move after it. Da­vid in his waiting upon God, saith, Mine eyes are towards thee, I lift up mine eyes and my heart to God; The same word is here used, The hireling looks.

For the reward of his work.

So we translate it. The Hebrew is, He looks for his work: [...] Why? he had work before, he had his work all day long, his Ma­ster shewed him his work, he needed not look for that; then his work is the reward of his work. In the Scripture, the word work signifies three things.

1. The very act of labour.

[Page 582] 2. The effect of labour, the thing wrought, or that which is the product of labour. When a man hath laboured, what he labour'd about is visible, and that we call his work, as well as the act of his labour.

3. The reward or the wages, which a man receives for his labour, Levit. 19. 13. we read a plain text for it, The wages of him that is hired, shall not abide with thee all night, until the morning. The Hebrew is, The work of him that is hired shal not abide with thee. So Psal. 109. 20. Let this be the reward of mine adversa­ries Obus est fructus seu merces obe­ris quae pro labo­re datur, ber Metonymiam from the Lord; The Hebrew is, Let this be the work of mine adversaries from the Lord. And Jer. 22. 13. we have the word in the same sence, work for wages. As it is usual to put prayer for the thing prayed for, a petition for the thing petitioned, or for the thing obtained by petition, The Lord hath given me my peti­tion (saith Hannah, 1 Sam. 1. 27.) that is, the child for whom I did petition. It is usual also in Scripture to put sin for the pu­nishment or reward of sin, Gen. 4. 13. My sin is greater, that is, my punishment is greater, than I can bear. And the Master is forbidden to detain the servants wages, least it be sin to him, Deut. 24. 15. that is, least he be punished for detaining it. Thus also it is usual to put the work for the reward of the work, The hireling expects his work, that is, he earnestly looks that he shall have wages in the evening for his work. Now (saith Job) as these wait, the servant and the hireling, for the shadow in the day, and for their wages at night; So I am made to possesse months of va­nity, &c.

I shall note a point or two in passage from the words, as they contain a general truth, before I examine them in this applicati­on.

Take the words as they are a direct proposition, A servant de­sires the shadow, and an hireling looks for the reward of his work. Hence observe,

First, The condition of a servant is a very laborious and a wea­risome condition; He longs for some rest; he earnestly desires the shadow. Observe,

Secondly, The servant must have a reward. Ther's all the rea­son in the world he should. Observe,

Thirdly, The hireling hath earnest thoughts upon his reward; His reward is in his eye. It is the reason given, why the wages of the hired servant should not be with-held, Deut. 24. 15. The Lord [Page 583] the righteous judge between Masters and servants, gives this ac­count or ground of his Law, Thou shalt not detaine his wages, for he setteth his heart upon it; Poor man, he hath been working all day, and he hath had his heart upon his wages; the hopes of that, gave him some relief and ease in going through his hard task and service, therfore thou shalt not keep it from him, his heart is set upon it.

But it may be questioned; Is not this a sin in the servant, to set his heart upon his wages? A charge is given, Psal. 62. 10. If riches increase, set not your heart upon them; and is it ap­proveable in a servant, to set his heart upon his wages or en­crease?

There is a great difference (and it is worthy our notice) be­tween those two Scriptures. The word in Deutronomy (speaking of the poor servant) notes the lifting up of the soul; He hath lifted up his soul unto it, so we read in the margin of our Bibles: But in the Psame (where he speaks of the covetous rich man) the word imports, the letting down, or setling of his heart upon it. A poor man hath but a little, and his wages (it may be) is above him, his wages (possibly) is more than he is worth, therefore he lifteth up his mind to it, as a mercy and a blessing from God, for the relief of himself and family; take heed (saith the Lord) that thou detain not his wages; for the poor man lifteth up his soul to it, as a thing he reacheth upward for; It is very dangerous to take that out of the hands of man, which he is taking (as it were) out of the hand of God. But a rich man, who hath aboundance, lets his heart down, he croucheth and broodeth upon the creature. A godly poor man, looks up to his reward, and fetches his bread from Heaven; A covetous rich man looks down to his reward, and takes his bread from the earth; A godly man is above all earthly things, and yet he lifts up his mind to receive them. A meer natural man is below earthly things, and yet he descends that he may receive them: The things which both receive, are the same, but the conveyance and derivation, differ alwayes, as much as Heaven and earth, sometimes, as much as Heaven and hell. But to the text. Lastly observe,

That, it is the property of an hireling (take it strictly) to eye his reward. This is the description of an hireling, he is one who looks to his reward, whatsoever be doth to his work. Christ, John 10. 13. confirms this character, The hireling fleeth, because he [Page 584] is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep; he cares much for the fleece, and for the flesh, but he cares little, if at all for the sheep, that is, how, or whether the sheep be fed and prosper. He that works for Christ, finds his reward in his work, and his eye is upon his work, as a reward, as well as upon the reward of his work: he is pleased as much, yea far more with his business, then he is with his wages: Did he not take content, and pay himself in this, that he is in a work acceptable to Christ, he could take no content, he could not be pleased at all, that he is in a work profitable to himself.

Now Job applies this general, about the nature of a servant and an hireling, to his own condition. So I am made to possess months of vanity, and wearisome nights are appointed to me.

So am I made. It looks like a strange, and a very unlikely simi­litude; As a servant desireth the shadow, so am I made to possess months of vanity: Therefore to clear it, we must remember, that this is a similitude with a dissimilitude: The similitude is conceald, the dissimilitude is exprest; we may make it out thus; As a ser­vant desireth the shadow, and an hireling looketh for the reward Similitudo dis­similis. of his work, so I, who am labouring in the heat of these affli­ctions, do earnestly desire a shadow, and I who am at work, as an hireling, would have a reward; that is, I would see the end and issue of these troubles; But (here's the dissimilitude) I am made to possesse months of vanity, and wearisome nights are appointed to me; As if Job had said, When the servant hath wrought all day, and is weary he can lie down at night quietly & rest himself; but alas! the night is as troublesome, and as laborious to me as the day; When the hireling hath laboured and taken pains, he re­ceives his reward at evening, but my wages are months of vanity, and my rewards are nights of trouble, I am paid in ill coyne, months of vanity, wearisome nights are appointed for the reward of weary dayes. Thus the sence is plain.

I am made to possess.] The word signifies possessing by inhe­ritance and descent. Two things are implied in that phrase: [...] Est jure baereditario a­liquid acquir [...]re & possidere.

First, that troubles and afflictions belong to us by right, they are possest as an inheritance, which we receive from our parents and progenitors. I am made to possesse. And,

Secondly, it notes the continuance of troubles upon us: We have not onely an ill lodging for a while, or we stay not with trou­ble, as travellers for a night, but we possess and inherit them as our [Page 585] own. Jobs troubles, were not to him as an hired house, or a lod­ging, but as an inheritance, wherein he was setled and estated: I am made to possesse months of vanity; as if he had said, you see what the patrimony and inheritance is, which descends to me: I have waited for comfort, and have been in expectation of good dayes, but I possess months of vanity, that's all I have found and felt, as the issue of my labours.

Months of vanity.] Some read, Empty Moons (the word [...] beares that sence) as if Jobs Moon were alwayes in the wane, or ever in the ecclipse. The word signifies any kind of vanity, whe­ther in word or in deed, personal vanity, or real vanity, falshood or deceit, any thing that is trivial or light. Such months have I ap­pointed to me.

But some may say: Months of vanity: Why doth Job com­plain of this? Hath any man in the world any other than months of vanity? Why then doth Job take it so ill, that he possesseth months of vanity, when no other fall to the lot or possession of any man? David Psal. 39. vers. 5. affirms, that, man at his best estate is altogether vanity; What reason then hath Job to com­plain of months of vanity in his worst estate? It was with him as well as with any of his neighbours, we know not who hath any other than months of vanity. The Preacher makes this the pre­face of his Sermon, Eccles. 1. 2. Vanity of vanities (saith the Preacher) vanity of vanities, all is vanity.

I answer, it is true, our whole life is a life of vanity, but yet there is more vanity in some mans life, or in some part of the same mans life, than in another. Vanity is gradual. There is a vain, and a rainer vanity, and there is the vainest vanity. Months of vanity may be understood two waies.

First, Months of vanity, that is, months empty of comfort, fruitlesse months, months bringing me no refreshing or con­tent. Inanis & va­cua, quia erat vacua hominibus jumentis & plantis. As Gen. 1. 2. it is said, the earth was without form and void: void, that is, it had neither man, nor beast, nor plant upon it, there was nothing but emptinesse upon the face of the earth, as it lay in that rude masse; So Job saith here, mine are months of vanity, void months, that is, months not filled up with any comfort, with any refreshing, with any joy, with any light or content, all these which are as the filling up of our months, and the beauty of time, are taken away from me, mine are empty months, my dayes are all Dogg-dayes, or at best, the dayes in the kalender of my life are blanks.

Secondly, Months of vanity, because he had not what he expe­cted, or the issue which he waited for: Job expresses himself in a Vacuum tempus est, quon nullam nobis offert utilitatem. posture of waiting, by the former similitudes; The hireling looks for his wages, and I look for somewhat, but it is in vain, I cannot enjoy it. So the word is used, Psal. 78. 33. where the Psalmist de­scribes the sinful distempers of the people of Israel, and Gods anger towards them, They beleeved not his word, &c. What then? Therefore their dayes did he consume in vanity, and their years in trouble. The dayes of all men are consumed in vanity, as we said before? but here was somewhat more judicial and poe­nal; It is a sore judgment to consume our dayes in vanity, as that people did: As soon as they came out of Egypt, they were in a fair way to Canaan; but God leads them about by the wilder­nesse, and there lets them wander out forty years, expecting and waiting for Canaan, but no Canaan came, or they came not to Canaan; this was the spending of their yeares in vanity, be­cause they were travelling to their desired rest, but enjoyed it not; they went toyling up and down the wildernesse as in a maze, find­ing no way out, but at the door of the grave; their carkasses fell in the wildernesse; thus their dayes were consumed in vanity. So saith Job, I possess months of vanity, that is, months wherein I am tired out in continual troubles, and they are fruitlesse, issue­lesse troubles, I have no sensible benefit by them, I see no end of them, my hopes are frustrate, and put far off from me. And are not these months of vanity? Observe hence, first,

Troubles will prevail upon us, whether we will or no. I am made to possess, &c. As if Job had said, I would fain have got over these months of vanity, or worn them out, but whether I will or no, I am made to possesse them. The bands of affliction, are too strong for the creature to break: when the Lord sends trouble, he will make a man possesse it, how displeasing soever it is; It is best for us to submit, where we cannot remedy, and to yeeld quietly to that, which we cannot avoid. Secondly, Observe,

Troubles come to us, as our natural inheritance. I am made to possess months of vanity, they are as mine inheritance, and I would wave my right, but I cannot. There are two parts of our natural patrimony, sin, and sorrow, both these descend to us, and we are made to possess them, till we come to our purchased inhe­ritance, reserved in Heaven for us. Observe thirdly,

That, though every mans life have vanity in it, yet some men [Page 587] have more: that is, more troubles and trials, more disquietments and disappointments. The common condition of all men, in their best estate is, that they are altogether vanity, but the vanity of some men is more vaine, their afflictions more afflicting, their troubles more troublesome, and their sicknesse more sick than their brethren. Job speakes as if he had spoil'd all the world of this in­heritance, and had engross'd all vanity to himself: I am made to possesse moneths of vanity: That vanity which is the portion of all men, seemes sometimes to be the portion of one man alone. I am the man that hath seen affliction, saith the Prophet Jeremie. Noctes pl [...]nae vigilijs & anxietatibus. Noctes laboris, i. e. laboriosas. Menses babco omni solatio vacuos, ut nec i [...] noctibus qui­dem liceat mihi quiesce e. Al­lusie ad servi & merceuarij nocturnam qui­erem, Pined. Lam. 3. 1. why, is that such a strange sight, who hath not seen af­fliction? True, but Ieremy had seen more, then most, and therefore he speakes, as if he only had seen affliction. I am the man.

And we arisome nights are appointed to me.

Wearisome nights.] Or nights of labour and wearinesse; As if Iob had said, though the servant be wearied all day, yet the night is not wearisome to him, he rests at night, but I am wearied in the day, and wearied in the night; wearisome nights are appoin­ted to me; the night which is given unto others for rest, is mea­sured out to me, in watchings and in sorrowes. And this is a great aggravation of his sad condition: it is said before, that he had moneths of vanity, yet it might be supposed, his nights were com­fortable intervals of refreshing: As a man may say, I have had seven years of hard labour, yet it is supposed he rested all the nights of those years; so when Iob saith, I had moneths of vanity, it might be conceived, he had, at least sometimes, a good night; therefore he adds, wearisome nights are appointed to me, I speake not after the rate of ordinary men, whose moneths labour, is a moneth of dayes, my labouring moneths include the night also.

A strong, healthy man goeth sorth to his labour and to his work, untill the evening, Psal. 104. 23. But a sick, weake man, goeth forth to his labour in the evening. Nox aegris maxime infesta est, toti sunt in cogitandis malis suis The night is most laborious to sick men, then they revolve their troubles, and being free from visits of friends, they visit their own afflictions, and study their own di­stempers, freely.

Are appointed to me.] The Hebrew is, [...] Numeravit, supputavit, un­de [...] mensis quod juxta lu­nae cursum menses nume­ramus. Non quancum (que) ra­tionem nume­randi de otat. sed artificialem & Arithme­ [...]c [...]m; ne (que) il­lam quam vo­cant Additionē, sed substra­ctionem. Are numbred, or reckned to me: as if he should say, God sets down my nights by tale or by scores, It is an arithmaticall word, is notes to number by art & skil: And some observe, that it notes Arithmetique in that operation of [Page 588] it, which we call substraction or subduction, not that which we call addition or multiplication. Wearisome nights, are numbred or appointed to me, in a kind of substraction, that is, God takes or substracts the night out of the moneths, and makes them as wea­risome and as troublesome to me, as the dayes are. And because those things, which are thus numbred by way of separation or sub­straction, are usually appointed or appropriated to some speciall Qui in hac ra­tione numer an­di quaedam sub­ducuntur, & quasi separan­tur, ideo signifi­cat scorsim de­stinare ad ali­quem specialem usum. use, therefore the word is well translated, to appoint or constitute: if you see a man separate or substract one thing from another, it is an argument that he hath a reason for what he doth, and intends it to some extraordinary purpose. The word is so taken here, to note a speciall end to which these nights, being substracted from the rest of his time, were appointed; namely, they were to be as Jobs pay and reward; He was troubled all day, and if he looked for his reward or comfort in the evening, this was given him, A night as wearisome as his day, or he had an ill nights rest given for his hard dayes labour. The Prophet gives us the word in such a sence, Isa. 56. 11, 12. He tels the Jewes their sin in the former words, Ye furnish a drink offering to that number; Some under­stand his meaning to be, a reproofe of that wicked and superstitious custome, wherein the Jewes (it seems) did sympolize with the heathens, who were wont to drink to their Idols by number, to such an Idol they would drink so many cups, and that was called a drink offering to that number; Now saith God, because you have done thus, namely, furnished a drink offering to that num­ber, therefore I will number you to the sword, or, therefore I will appoint you to the sword, I will substract and take you out, and you shall be the men separated for the sword to deal with and de­stroy; I will number you to the sword, that shall drink your bloud, because you have been so accurate in wickednesse, to drink by number. The word is applied to Christ (Isa. 53. 12.) He was numbred amongst the transgressors, that is, he was taken aside, and separated from the innocent, and ranked amongst transgres­sors; which notes him appointed, or set apart to that end, that so he might be the Saviour of transgressors, and a deliverer of the wicked from their sins. In Daniel 1. ver. 10. when those chil­dren of the Hebrewes, desired to be spared from eating the Kings diet, I dare not doe it, saith the steward, for I feare my Lord the King, who hath appointed your meate and your drink; as if it should be said, he hath numbred out to you, so many dishes [Page 589] of meat he hath numbred out to you, so many flagons of wine, he hath substracted such a proportion, and appointed it to you, and I dare not alter it. And in the Prophesie of Jonah, chap. 1. ver. 17. it is said, God prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah, so we translate, the Hebrew is, God numbred a great fish to swallow up Jonah, that is, God did separate or substanct a fish from all the rest of the fishes of the sea, for that end and purpose, to swallow up Ionah. From all which instances it is clear, that the word notes an appointment, by way of design, or the drawing of a thing to some speciall use and service. When a Party is drawn out of the body of an Army, they are numbred or appointed to some design; such a meaning is in Iobs words, these nights are substracted or drawn out, and then appointed to be my reward and wages. The summe of all is, Iob comparing his estate with that of hirelings, servants and souldiers, finds his far worse than theirs, they have rest in the night, at least some nights they rest, but he had none.

Observe here the law of nature, Night is the time of rest. Sleepe is the parenthesis of our troubles: it puts a stop to our sorrowes, and gives intermission to our labours. Observe secondly,

That the troubles of every night, and how many troublesome nights any one shall have, are determined by God himselfe. I have wearisome nights (saith Iob) but they come not by accident, they are appointed and exactly numbred to me. It is matter of great com­fort, to remember, that God is thus accurate about our sorrows: He gives his people a cup of sorrow, & he appointeth how many drops shall be in their cup, all the world cannot put in one drop beyond his measure: He appointeth out our trouble for the kind, and for the degree, and for the time or continuance of it; how many wea­risome nights, how long every night shall be, are all calculated and set down, in the kalender of his heavenly counsels.

I shall adde but a word of the next verse, which is onely the description of a wearisome night: Iob having said, that wearisome nights were appointed or numbred out to him: now resolves us what he meanes by a wearisome night, or when he accounts a night wearisome.

Verse 4. When I lie down, I say, when shall I arise, and the night be gone? And I am full of tossings to and fro, unto the dawning of the day.

This is a wearisome night, and it is a most exact description [Page 590] of a wearisome night; when a man, as soone as he goeth to bed, desires to rise, as soone as it is night, enquires for day, this man hath a weary time of it.

When shall I arise, and the night be gone? Mr Broughton translates, the duskie time be gone? The word signifies evening, and the verbe, to mingle or to mix; because the evening is a time, [...] Miscuit, adve­sperascit, inde [...] vespera tempus ill [...]d cum tenebrae miscentur luci. wherein there is a mixture (as it were) of light and darknesse. Evening, is light and darknesse mingled; hence we call it twilight; And though all the night be (in this sence) mixed, because in na­ture there is no pure darknesse, yet in the evening, this mixture is more discernable; therefore it is rather appliable to the former part of the night, because afterward the light is more fully over­come, and conquered.

When shall the night be gone? The Hebrew is, when shall the [...] Mensu­ravit binc [...] mensu­ram quantita­tis continuae de­notot, sicut [...] discretae. night be measured out? There is an elegancy in that; it signifies to measure a thing, as we measure cloth, by a yard, or as ground is measured, by a rod or pole; it signifies likewise to measure time, to tell, count and observe the houres: As if Iob had said, of himself (as many times sick men doe) I lie a bed all night, and tell the clock. The clock is the measure of the night: now, saith he, when shall the night be measured out? As if he had (with sorrow) counted the tedious houres, oh when will this time be measured out? what a long night is this! As come to a sick man in a mor­ning, and you shall have him say, what a long, tedious night was this? as long as two or three nights.

He adds yet another part of the description, I am full of tossings to and fro unto the dawning of the day. He lay measuring the night, and was unquiet all the while, full of tossings to and fro. The [...] Satura­tus word signifies to be filled with meat and drinke; I have my fill of troubles, my fill of torture, I have unquietnesse enough, as much as I can hold of sorrow.

Tossings to and fro.] The word is understood by some, of in­ward tossings. I am full of tossings to and fro, that is, I have great [...] à radice [...] motus, remotus-elorgatus. Ce­terem agitatio­nem denotat. Saturatus sum v [...]gis cogitatio­nibus. Rab. Lev agitations in my heart, my thoughts are very unsetled. One of the Rabbines to that sence, I am full of wandring thoughts; thoughts will tosse up and downe, forward and backward; A mans thoughts will tosse him from one end of the world unto the other; while he is a prisoner in his bed: They tosse him from busi­nesse to businesse, while he is unfit for any businesse. A sicke man is full of inward tossings, of wandring thoughts, his thoughts run [Page 591] fastest, when himself is bed-rid, or confin'd to his bed: all the night is spent in the travell of his mind, while his body cannot stirre.

But rather undestand it of corporall tossings. A sick man full of Aegrotantes mutationibus ut remedijs u­tuntur. Sen. paine removes from one side of his bed to another, from one corner to another, sometimes from the head of the bed to the foot. The Mo­ralist expresses it excellently, Sick men use changes, as if they were medicines, they hope by changing their place to loose their pain by the way, I am full of tossings to and fro.

Till the dawning of the day.

Till the day breake, that is, the whole night though. Some un­derstand [...] Crepuscu­lum vespertinū, vel matutinum. this for the evening, the word signifies both the evening and the morning. And these interpret this latter part of the verse, for his troubles in the day, having complained before, that weari­some nights were appointed to him, When I lie downe, I say, when will the night be gone? There is an end of the night, but when the night is gone, have I any ease in the day? No, I am full of tos­sings to and fro, untill the evening; And so it is an amplification of his troubles in regard of both parts of the naturall day, light and darknesse. But we may more properly keep it to the description of a wearisome night, and that word, which may note the evening, is here to be appropriated to the dawning of the day, when darknes begins to depart, and give way to the prevailing light.

This was a great aggravation of the afflictions of this holy man, he had no rest, no ease, in any part of the night, he could not so much as, get a nap towards morning.

The night is the time of our truce with troubles, through a man be in conflicts with businesse all day long, yet there is a cessation at night, all is laid by till morning. Hence the night and sleepe are well called, The Conquerours of evill, and Victors over sorrow; Malurum Do­mi [...]ices. because in the night a man gets rid of them. Christ saith, Mat. 6. ult. Sufficient to the day is the evil thereof: if there be evil enough in the day, who is able to stand before the evils of day and night too? When our very sleepe becomes our fight, what can flesh and blood doe any more? Sleepe is a medicine for all diseases, and Physi­tians often give a sleepie potion for a medicine, that the body may have a little refreshing, after it hath been worne and tired out with a wakefull sicknesse.

Observe from the text, as it is the description of a sick man;

That a man in pain lo [...]ks upon every time as better to him, than the present time. When I lie down, I say, when shall I arise? I hope it will be better with me anon, I hope the day will be better to me than the night, and when the day comes, then he wisheth for night hoping the night will be better than the day. An afflicted trouble­some time is so described, Deut. 28. 67. In the Morning thou shalt say, would God it were Even, and at Even thou shalt say, would God it were Morning; They shall think any thing, or time to come, better to them, then the present; therefore when they had night, they call'd for day, and when they had day, they sent a messenger for the night, ever thinking the next change of time, would be-friend them with a change in their condition. Observe, Secondly.

Change of place giveth no ease of pain. I am full of tossings to and fro to the dawning of the day; he had changed, and changed, and changed, but could not change his paine for ease, that continued still. Some travell to other Countries to mend their Estates. Some goe from kingdom to kingdome to ease their minds; and some to better their manners; but, as he that runs to another coun­try caelum non ani­mam mutat, qui trans mare cur­rit. changes his aire, but not his heart, alters place, but not his manners, the same is the same still: So it brings no health to the sick, no ease to the pained to change place.

As a man sin-sick, before he comes to rest and healing in Christ, tosses from place to place, from this duty to that duty, from this meanes to that meanes to get a little ease for his wounded spirit and aking conscience; he hopeth this will do him good, and that will doe him good, but all in vaine. And as worldly men hope their pleasures and their riches will do them good, and so they tosse from one pleasure to another, from creture to creature, but al fails there is no settlement, no composednesse, no peace, no redresse, till the soul fixes upon Christ. So in bodily paines, there is no ease, no refreshing, but in God: it is not this or that place of the bed, it is not the bed or the couch, it is not the Country or the City, a sharp or a temperate aire can do it; God can alone, and he can command any creature to do it.

You that have moneths of comfort, and to whome refreshing nights are appointed, blesse God, it is not your bed that gives you rest, but his blessing.

Remember this description of a sicke man: present the condition of a sick man to your thoughts, thinke what a wearisome thing it [Page 593] is, to lie all night telling the clock, calling for day, and tossing to and fro, praise God for quiet nights, and pity those to whom wea­risome nights are appointed.

JOB Chap. 7. vers. 5, 6, 7, 8.

My flesh is cloathed with wormes, and clods of dust, my skin is bro­ken, and become loathsome.

My daies are swifter than a Weavers shuttle, and are spent with­out hope.

O remember that my life is wind, mine eye shall no more see good.

The eye of him that hath seen me shall see me no more; thine eyes are upon me, and I am not.

VVE have seen Job in this Chapter confirming his former de­sires of death.

  • 1. From the generall condition of man-kind, v. 1.
  • 2. From the condition of some parlicular man, v. 2. And
  • 3. From his own present condition, which he draws forth in the 3, 4, 5, and 6, verses.

The third and the fourth verses have been already opened.

In this fifth he gives us a further description of himself, and such a one, as might well assure us, that his restlesse nights were not without reason, My flesh is cloathed, &c. As if he had said, if you think I am thus unquiet without cause, then behold my body, look upon me, and see what a pitifull spectacle I am, My flesh is cloa­thed with worms, my skin is broken and hecome loathsome.

These words give us Jobs picture, here is his delineation and pourtracture, as he was under the hand of God. They who would take Jobs picture, as, in the day of his afflictions, must draw him, thus, A man clothed with worms and clods of dust, there's his gar­ment; his skin scabby and discolor'd, full of chaps and running sores, angry biles and enflamed ulcers, his posture, lying on the ground, scraping himself with a pot-sheard. [...] caroper Synec­dochen corpus in Piel Bisher sig­nificat Evan­gelium.

My flesh is clothed with worms.

My flesh.] That is, my body, by a Synechdoche; and the word which we translate flesh, springs from a root, or hath neare [Page 594] relation to it, which signifies to bring and publish good tidings, or welcome news; and therefore the Gospel is exprest by it (Evan­gelium) is the same in Latin, or ( [...]) in Greeke with this in the Hebrew: And some Criticks give the reason, why flesh is exprest by this word, which signifies to publish or bring good ty­dings, because there should be a taking of flesh, or a making of flesh, namely the incarnation of our Lord Iesus Christ, which should be the best tidings, and the most joyfull news that ever the world heard of.

Is clothed with worms.

In the first Chapter of this booke at the 21. verse, Iob describes himself thus, Naked came I out of my mothers wombe, and na­ked shall I return; but now it seemes Iob hath got clothing, and being ready to lie downe in the grave, he had a vesture put upon him, now (it seemes) Iob should not goe naked out of the world, for he said, My flesh is clothed; but, what is this clothing? My flesh is clothed with worms, and clods of dust, that's a suite of clothes very fit and sutable for the grave, but it is usually put on in the grave. Iob is in his grave-clothes before he dies; or, he speakes this to shew that he accounted himself dead, while he lived, or (as Heman mourns, Psa. 88.) Free among the dead; A member of that Corporation, a brother of that society already. For he was now in their habet or livery, A gown of worms set or embroidered with clods of dust.

My flesh is clothed with wormes.

It is frequent in Scripture, when the holy Ghost would heighten the sense of what we are, & enjoy, would to note the abundance of Quavis re ve­stiri dicimur, Cujus accessio­ne vel dedeco­ramur, vel oc­namur. a thing, or how man is adorned, or defiled with it all over, then to expresse it under the notion of cloathing; God himself is ex­prest, cloathed with Majesty, because he is Majestie all over, and there is nothing but glory upon him; God is also described, clothed with judgement and with justice; why? Because these are his honour and his ornament, he is justice and judgement all o­ver; we find Job in the 29. of this book at the 14, verse, speaking thus of himself in his state of Magistracy, I put on righteousnesse, and it clothed me, my judgement was as a robe and a diademe; that is, I was full of righteousnesse, I was altogether reghteous, in dispensing re wards and punishments, in exercising my power a­mong [Page 595] the people. To be cloathed with humility, to be cloathed with the Spirit, to be clothed with Christ, are phrases of the same importance. So on the other hand to be cloathed with pride, with shame, with dishonour, Let mine enemies (saith David) be cloathed with shame, Psal. 109. 29. Let them be cloathed with dis­honour, Psal. 35. 26. that is, let them be ashamed and dishonour'd, all over, or exceedingly ashamed or dishonoured. And so a great desolation is called a cloathing with desolation, Ezekiel 7. 27. That which stripps a man naked is in this sence called his cloathing, cloathed with desolation.

Thus we are to understand Job, when he saith, That his flesh was cloathed with wormes; his meaning is, he had many wormes, crawling upon his flesh, or lying within his flesh, and so were as a lining to his upper garment of nature. These worms spread them­selves all over him, as a filthy and loathsome garment covering his whole body.

And besides this figure, Job spake properly, while he was thus full of sores, and botches, and boyles, to say, he was cloathed with wormes; wormes are proper to sores, many sores, breed wormes, and wormes are a disease in the flesh, as well as within the bowels, and such diseases are accounted the foulest and filthiest diseases of all other: Such was Jobs, his sores and boiles corrupted and bred wormes, which made him an abhorring to himself, Putrifaction is the foyle out of which worms grow, Rotten flesh breeds wormes, and a rotten conscience breeds a worm, Isa. 66. 24. Their worme shall not die; why doth the holy Ghost say of those men who were never washed, nor healed of their sinne-sores, of their soul-sicknes­ses and pollutions, that when they die, they have a worme, that dieth not. It is in allusion to this, because, as a corrupt body, or corrupt putrid flesh, breeds noisome wormes, so a corrupt consci­ence, a soule full of filthinesse and uncleannesse, which was never washed or healed in the fountain of the bloud of Christ, this soul, this conscience breeds wormes, even that gnawing worme, which shall live with it, feed upon it, and cloath it for ever. Both the naturall and the spirituall worme, arise from rottennesse, and derive their pedigree from sores, sicknesses, and putrifaction.

And clods of dust.

Wormes and clods of dust. Here are strange materials, course stuffe for Jobs cloathing, clods of dust. Some conceive that Job [Page 596] sate in the dust, and so the dust gathered about him, as a garment. Others, that these clods of dust, were the scrapings of his sores, for [...] the word signifies the filings of any mettall, or the scrapings of an uncleane thing. It is said expressely in the second Chapter, that he tooke a pot-sherd to scrape himself; those clods of filthy dust, or scales scrap'd from his putrifying sores; these, with the crawling wormes bred in them, cover'd his whole body like a garment, and therefore he complaines, I am cloathed with worms and clods of dust.

You see what his garment was, see now (to carry on the allu­sion) his skin, upon which this garment was put? My skin (saith he) is broken, and become loathsome. The skin is the immediate garment of the flesh, his sicknesse had worne out his skin, he had many holes and rents in that garment, which needed mending, and it was all over so filthy, that it needed washing. My flesh is broken and become loathsome. Sores breake the skin, and defile the skin, Jobs skin was so broken and chapt, so defiled and filthy, that he was loathsome to all beholders, and to himself.

This is the picture of Job, A few daies before, you might have pictured or drawn him thus, Job cloathed with silk and scarlet, his garment set with precious orientall stones, his skin smooth and beautifull, his face cheerfull and manly, his eye quick and piercing. But now Job is cloathed with worms and clods of dust, his skin is broken and become loathsome.

We may hence learne, what our own bodies are. The Apostle (Phil. 3. 21.) cals the body, a vile body; not that the worke of God was vile: The worke of God was noble and honourable in all he wrought, especially in that Master-peece of it, the fabrique of mans body; but as the body is come out of the hands of sinne, so it is a vile body, that is, it is a body subject to corruption, and will quickly corrupt, be vile and loathsome, 1 Cor. 15 53. This corruptable must put on incorruption. The body of man is but one remove from wormes and corruption, Chap. 17. 4. I have said to corruption thou a [...]t my Father, and to the worme, thou art my mother. We shall quickly bear the image of our parents, wormes and corruption.

Then be not proud of your bodies, nor of your beauties; They, who are now the fairest and goodliest to looke upon, may quickly have a broken and a loathsome skin; A disease, one fit of sicknesse will spoile all thy beauty, deface and blemish thy excellent feature, [Page 597] and if a disease doth it not, old-age will, time will draw furrows in thy face, and make wrinkles in thy brow. Strength and beauty of body are no matches for time. All things were made in time, and time will marr all things. So long as generation con­tinues, corruption must.

Againe, take heed of pride in cloathing. The two externals, of which man is most subject to be proud, are beauty and apparell. Cloaths are a flag of vanity, and pride sits upon the skirts. But remember how fine soever your cloathing is this day and houre, God can put you on another suite before to morrow. We see what change of apparrell Iob had, a godly man, an humble man. That which God did to try the grace of one; he can quickly do to punish and chastise the sin of another; he can quickly put you on such clothing, as you shall have little cause to be proud of. He can make you weare wormes and clods of dust.

And if we consider it, we have little reason to be proud of clothes: for if we follow the best of them to their originall, they will be found to be but a clothing of wormes, and clods of dust; what are silkes, sattins and velvets, but the issue of wormes? And what is your gold and silver, what your pearls and precious stones? are they any thing (if you will resolve them into their principles) but clods of dust? They are indeed better concocted by the heat of the Sunne, refined and polished by the art of a man, but if you search their pedigree, they also are but clods of dust. In your most glorious aray, you are but cloathed with dust and wormes, and if you be proud of such cloathing, God can cloth you with worms and clods, not onely of unrefined and unpollished, but of putrified and filthy dust.

Thus we see the first thing, the picture or description of Iobs body, His friends at first sight, might be convinced, that a body in such a case, could take little rest day or night. He carries on his complaint, a degree further, at the 6. verse.

Verse 6. My daies are swifter than a Weavers shuttle, and are spent without hope.

My daies are swifter.] The Seventy render it thus, My daies [...]. are swifter or nimbler than a word or speech. Nothing moves fa­ster or passeth away more lightly, than a word; a word is gone, and it is gone suddenly; Hence the similitude is used proverbially, Psal. 90. 9. We spend our daies, as a tale that i [...] told, or, as a me­ditation [Page 598] (so some translate) suddenly or swiftly; a discourse is quick­ly over, whether it be a discourse from the mouth, or in the mind; and of the two, the latter is far the more swift and nimble of foot, a discourse in our thoughts out-runs the Sunne, as much as the Sunne out-runs a snaile; the thoughts of a man will travell the world over in a moment; he that now sits in this place, may be at the worlds end in his thoughts, before I can speak another word. So that the translation of glosse, by speech or meditation, aggravates the sence, and extends it to the highest.

But the word properly signifies (as we translate) a Weavers shuttle, which is an instrument of a very swift and sudden motion. [...] And the word which we render [Swifter] signifies that which is fitted for the swiftest motion, Any light thing, because those things which are light, move swiftest; and we call a good runner, a man light of foot, Hab. 1. 8. The horses of the Chaldeans are thus de­scribed, Their horses are swifter (or lighter of foot) than the Leopards, so, swifter or lighter than the weavers shuttle, which passeth the loome or web with such speed, that it is growne to a Radius Texto­ris dictum pro­verbiale, radio velocius. proverbe, for all things which are quick and transient. The La­tines expresse it by that word, which signifies a ray of the Sunne, which is darted in a moment from one end of the heavens to a­nother.

But a question rises. Iob in the third Chapter, and so in the fifth, complains that his life was so prolonged, and slow-paced that it was very tedious to him, and in this Chapter by a repeated re­quest, he spurrs and hastens his life to it's journies end; he thought (it seemes) his time not wing'd, but slow footed; how is it then, that in this place he complaineth of the swiftnesse of his daies? My daies are swifter than a Weavers shuttle.

I answer, In a word: By his dayes, here, we are to understand his good dayes, his dayes of comfort and prosperity; the dayes of my peace and plenty, are slipped away and gone, even as a weavers shuttle. But when he complains that his life is slow-footed, and requests that his dayes might move faster, he meanes the dayes of sorrow and trouble which had overtaken him in his journey; the former were too swift, and the latter too slow; It is as if he had said, Alas, all my faire dayes of prosperity are gone, they are slipt away as a weavers shuttle, they are as a tale that is told, nothing remaines of them, but the remembrance, which is an addition to my sorrow; but now I have dayes, that seeme long, very long, they [Page 599] hand upon my hands, I cannot get them off, my sorrowes clog my time, and make every houre seeme a yeare. Hezekiah in his complaint upon his sick bed, useth this allusion, Mine age is de­parted and removed from me, as a shepheards tent, I have cut off like a weaver my life, Isa. 38. 12. As the weaver cuts off the thred when the web is finished, so it is with me, I have cut off as a weaver my life; Not that Hezekiah was active in his own death, we are not to understand it so, for he pray'd that God would spare him; and he spake this upon the promise of God, to lengthen out his life, and to tye the thread of his dayes againe, according to which the web was woven on for fifteen yeares more; But this speech of Hezekiah, as a weaver I have cut off my life, is like that of the Apostle, I have finished my course. He compares the passing of his life to a shuttle, and the conclusion of it to the cut­ting off, of the thread; Nights and dayes passe this shuttle forward and backward, to and againe, the night casts it to the day, and the day to the night, beween these two, time quickly weares off the thred of life. The heathen Poets had a fiction answering this al­lusion of the holy Ghost; they tell us a story, or a fiction rather, of three sisters, whereof the one held the wheele or the distaffe, the Tres Parcae elo­tho Lachesis A­tropos. second drew out the thred, and a third cut it off; In this they sha­dow the state of mans life; our ordinary phrase for living long, is spinning a long thred, and for dying, the cutting off the thred of life.

And they are spent without hope. Some translate, they are spent so, as that there is no hope left. The word, which here we [...] english, spent, signifies both consumption and consummation, or sometimes in a good sense, the end or perfecting of a thing, and sometime in an ill sense, the end or consuming of a thing, Gen. 2. 1. So the Heavens and the earth were finished, It is this word, they were ended, God ended his works by way of perfe­ction, and consummation, he made his work compleate. But here, and often in Scripture, it notes ending by way of consumption, or as we translate, the spending of a thing; Jer. 14. 12. I will con­sume (or make an end of) them by the sword; And Exod. 33. 3. God commands Moses, to goe with the people into the wilder­nesse, for (saith he) I will not goe up in the midst of them, lest I consume them in the way.

And to shew how deep an expence and consumption of time was upon him, Job tells us, it had devoured and eaten up all his [Page 600] hope. It is worse to have our hope spent, then to have our dayes spent; now (saith he) my dayes are spent, and that is not all, my hope is spent; Some translate so, my dayes are spent, and I have Cum inopia spei, vel defectu spei, sc. longio­ris vitae. want or penury of hope; as I have spent my dayes, so I have spent my hope. And his hopelessenesse, may refer two wayes; I have no hope, or my hope is spent; First, in regard of long life, I see I am so afflicted with this disease, that there is no hope I should hold out under it: Secondly, without hope, that is, without hope of be­ing in a better condition, that is, of having my estate restored un­to me again, if I should have health restored, and a longer life con­tinued. In both these sences, as he saw the thred of his dayes cut off, so he saw the thred of his hope cut off, he was near death, and his hope was dead. My dayes are spent without hope, or, there is no hope remaining. This also is a negative to both parts of Eliphaz his promise, either of longer life, or of a better.

We may observe hence, first, a common truth (which I shall not insist upon) about that pretious commodity, a commodity more pretious then the gold of Ophir, Time.

All time is short, and we have a very short estate in time. Man is not master of one day, and a servant but of few dayes. The holy Ghost gives us very many remembrances of this, which is an ar­gument, that we are very apt to forget it. Man is slow to take no­tice of the swiftnesse of time, and very dull in apprehending the speed of his dayes. It is a wonder that such a plaine common do­ctrine, should be handled so often, and that the Holy Ghost, should as it were, labour for similitudes, and fetch in all things that are more then ordinarily transitory in nature, to teach us the transi­torinesse of our condition: We meete with many in this booke, all hinting at the sudden, invisible motion of time: This is a point easie to be known, but very hard to be beleeved; every man assents to it, but few live it. And surely the holy Ghost would not spend so many words about it, nor gather up so many illustrations of it from sence, if it were not of much importance to our faith. We usually slight the hearing of common principles; [...]nd a Sermon preacht upon this subject, the shortnesse of our lives, and the speed of time, is judg'd a needlesse shortning of time; and the houre seemes very long, which runs out upon the speed of time; we think it an easie doctrine, and a Theame for boyes. But the truth is, if the heart did well disgest, how few our dayes are, we should have better dayes; and men would live holier, if they [Page 601] knew indeed their lives were no longer. Therefore though I only touch this subject, yet, doe ye dwell upon it, and stay long in your thoughts upon the shortnesse of your lives: Common truths neg­lected, cause a neglect of every truth. Had we more serious thoughts of Heaven and hell, that these are, and what these are; that there is a God, and who he is; that there will be a judgement, and what it will be, we should more profitably improve and trade our time and talents. Secondly note,

Time passeth irrecoverably. When the weavers shuttle is once out of his hand, 'tis gone presently; there is no hope time past should be recalled, or time in motion stopt: To consider time un­der that notion, should make us very good husbands of our time, or (as the Apostle advises) to redeeme the time. Redemptions are made by purchase, to redeem a thing, is to buy it with a price; the price we redeeme time with, is our labourand faithfull travell. It is matter of mourning, to consider, that so little care is taken in spending that, which when it is gone, we have no hope it can be restored to us again.

Thirdly, In that Iob complained before, that his life was so long, and now complaineth of the shortnesse or swiftnesse of his life, we may note; That,

Man thinks good daies end too soone, and that evill dayes stay too long, or will never have an end. We love the company of good dayes, and are therefore sorry when they depart: When the Disci­ples were upon the Mount, and had such a good day of it, how de­sirous were they to have continued there, and sorry they were the day was at an end. Master (saith Peter) it is good for us to be here: The sudden passing of our comforts, is our trouble. Time is alwayes of the same pace, no creature keeps his pace more evenly then time doth, it alwayes moves at the same rate, neither faster nor slower; but man thinks this time short, and that time long; this time speedy, and that time slow, according to the severall ob­jects he meets with, and to the conditions wherein he is: Fourthly observe,

That hope is the last refuge of the soule: My dayes are spent without hope, my hope is spent too; If I had hope left, I had some­what left, but my hope is gone. It is so in naturall things, it is so in spirituall things. The Apostle, Heb 6. tells us, that hope is the anchor of the soule, sure and stedfast; while hope holds, comfort holds, and when hope's gone, all's gone. Observe lastly,

That, sometimes a godly mans hope may lye prostrate. My dayes (saith he) are cut off without hope: Job thought (as I have noted from some passages before (that his case was desperate, his hope lay in the dust, as well as his body, or his honour. Every god­ly man is not an Abraham, of whom it is said, Rom. 4. 18. That against hope he beleeved in hope: Nay Abraham is not alwayes Abraham, he that hath such a strong hope, hath it not alwayes, even his hope may sometimes possibly be hopelesse. There are weakenesses in the strongest, and imperfections may come upon those who are perfect, ebbings after the greatest flowings, and declinings after the greatest heights of graces and gracious actings My dayes are spent without hope.

Job having thus complained of his condition, and asserted his own desires of death, now turnes from his friends, with whom he had discoursed all this while, and betakes himself to God, to speake a while with him; The next words are generally under­stood, an Apostrophe to God:

Verse 7. Or member that my life is wind, mine eye shall no more see good, &c.

O remember that my life is wind. To remember, is not here ta­ken strictly, for to God all things are present. Remembrance, is the calling of that to mind which is past; when the act of remem­bring is applied to God in Scriprure, it hath one of these three sences.

1. It notes a resolution or setled purpose in God, to act his ju­stice, or inflict punishment upon his enemies, Psal. 137. 7. Re­member, O Lord, the children of Edom: that is, Lord bring forth that decree of thine, for the ruine and destruction of these bloudy Edomites, who have been cruell against thy people.

Secondly, it signifies an affection in God, ready to help and re­leeve his own people: Psal. 74. 2. Remember thy Congregation which thou didst purchase of old, that is, doe good to thy Congre­gation, blesse thy Congregation.

Thirdly, To remember, imports an act of present consideration: to remember, is fully to weigh, observe and take notice of the estate of things or persons: Psal. 38. 39. He remembred that they were but flesh, a wind that passeth away and cometh not againe; that is, he consider'd and weighed the estate of man: So in this place, O remember that my life is wind, that is, consider, and weigh it [Page 603] well Lord, put my condition into the ballance, observe what a weak creature I am, how short my llfe is: therefore deal with me, as with a weak short-lived creature; Thou needest not lay any great stresse upon me, thou needest not trouble thy self much to make an end of me, my life is but wind, 'tis but a puffe, which quickly passes away.

O remember that my life is wind. This is a proverbial speech, Vita ventus, Elegans pro­verbiale. like that before, of a weavers shuttle. The word translated wind, signifies the holy Ghost, the third Person in the blessed Trinity: As also a Spirit in general. And because the wind is of a spiritual na­ture, invisible, swift, powerful, therefore it is applied to that aerial or elementary spirit; And the operation of the holy Ghost, is sha­dowed by wind or breath, Christ breathed upon his Disciples say­ing, receive the holy Ghost, John 20. 22. and the holy Ghost came as a mighty rushing wind, Acts 2. 2.

When Job saith, remember that my life is wind, he means, my Quasi ventus Targum. life is like the wind; It is a similitude; not an assertion. The life of man is like the wind in two things: First, the wind passeth away speedily, so doth mans life: Secondly, the wind when it is past, returns no more, as you cannot stop the wind, or change its course; So all the power in the world, is not powerful enough to re­callor divert the wind, which way the wind goes it will goe, and when it goes 'tis gone, Ps. 78. 34. He remembred that they were but flesh, wind that passeth away; in this sence Job calleth his life a wind, it passeth away, and shall not return, by any law or constitution of nature, or by any efficacy of natural causes.

Yet here observe, Job saith not, His soul was a wind, but his life was a wind. Some have philosophiz'd the soul into a wind, a blast or a breath; and tell us, that it goes, as the soul of a beast, that life and soul are but the same thing, when the life's gone out of the body, the soule's gone from its being: They acknowledg a resto­ring of it again with the body at the resurrection, but deny it any existence when separate from the body. How dishonourable this is to the noble constitution of man, and how dissonant to Scrip­ture, is proved in mentioning it; we acknowledge, that life which is the union of soul and body, is a wind and passeth away; In all the learned languages, Hebrew, Greek, Latine, the [...] Flare. [...], Spiri­tus a spirando; Animum quasi [...] quidam dictum existi­mant. Graeci pro re­spiratione seu spiritu quem ducimas acei­piunt. primo quod vita no­stra respiratio­ne indige [...]t; sccundo quod flatu videatur humana vita in prima sua origine consti­tisse, word which signifies spirit or life, hath its original, from respiring; and when we say, my wind was gone, or my wind was almost beaten out of my body, our meaning is, my Life was almost gone. In the [Page 604] creation (Gen. 2. 7.) God breathed into man the breath of life, or of lives, implying the many facultes and operations of life. And in as much as the body of man was first formed, and this life brought in after, to act and move it, this is an abundant proof, that the soule of man is not any temperament of the body, the body be­ing compleated (as a body) before it, and yet no life resulting. Wher­as beasts (to whom that beastly opinion compares man in his creation) had living bodies as soone as bodies, their totall form being but an extract from the matter.

Solomen, Eccl. 3. 19, 20, 21. brings in the Atheist, drawing this con­clusion from those confused oppressions which he observed in the world: men carried themselves so like beasts, preying upon, and de­vouring one another, that he (who had nothing but carnall rea­son to judge by) presently resolves; That which befalleth the sons of men, befalleth beasts, even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other, yea they have all one breath; so that a man hath no preeminence above a beast, for all are vanity; all goe to one place, all are of the dust, and all turn to the dust again. And whereas the Atheist heard some speake of the ascent of mans spirit after this life, he puts it off, as but talke and guessing. ver. 21. Who knoweth the spirit of man, that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast, that goeth downward to the earth? That is, who can tell that there is such a difference, between the spirit of a man and of a beast? who ever saw the one ascending, or the other descen­ding? or from what Anatomie was this learned? Thus the A­theist derides the doctrine of the soul, and will therefore laugh and be merry with his body while it lasts, that's his portion, For who shall bring him to s [...]e what shall be after him, ver. 22. Is it not strange, that any who are called sober Christians, should plant their opinions in this soyle of Atheisme: and make that a proofe of their faith, which Solomon brings only as a proofe of some mens infidelity? The Preacher in this Book, personated those whom he abhor'd, and sometimes speakes the practises of other men, not his own opinion. There is no more reason to ground this Tenet of the Soules Mortality upon those texts, then there is of encouragement to intemperancie in that, chap. 11. 9. Rejoyce O young man in thy youth, and let thy heart cheare thee in the dayes of thy youth, and walke in the wayes of thine own heart; Or in that of the Apostle, 1 Cor. 15. 32. Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die. If any would learne Solomons own sence about this [Page 605] point, let him reade it, as plaine as words can make it (Eccl. 12. 7.) Then (namely when man dies) shall the dust return to the earth, as it was, and the spirit shall return unto God, who gave it.

So then (to the next before us) the soule is not a wind, but the Hujusmodi sententi [...] re­gressum anima­rum in corpora minin è negant, sed necessitatem moriendi con­firmant, & ce­leri: atem. life: And all those Scriptures where life is compared to wind, and dying, to the passing of it without returning, deny the regresse or returning of the soule to a naturall, not to an eternall life, and imply the short stay of the soule in the body, and certaine departure from it, not, a not being, when it parts. These two must part, and so part, as never to returne to that estate againe; Thus Iob expounds him­selfe in the words following;

Mine eye shall no more see good. Or as the Hebrew, I shall not return to see good, answerable to the metaphor of a wind, it pas­seth away, and returnes no more.

To see. In this place, as often elsewhere, is to enjoy, I shall not Videre bonum pro frui, nota locutio est. enjoy good, Psal. 4. 6. Who will shew, or who will cause us to see any good? It was not the bare sight of good, which they desired, but the enjoyment of it. So Ier. 17. 6. The man whose heart de­parteth from God, is threatned, that he shall not see, when good com­eth, that is, he shall not enjoy good, when it comes: For though to see good be a mercy, yet to see it and not to tast it, is a curse. There­fore at the last day, they who thought themselves high in Gods favour, but were indeed under his wrath, are told, that they shall Lam. 13. 26. see Abraham, Isaac and Iacob in the Kingdome of God, and them­selves shut out; they shall see what they cannot enjoy, and that sight shall adde to their sorrow. The Prophet cries out, Lament. 3. 1. I am the man that hath seen affliction, that is, I am the man that hath felt and had experience of afflictions. And Psalm 16. 10. the great promise to Christ is, that though he took a corruptible body upon him, yet he should not see corruption, that is, partake of corruption; corruption should have no communion with, much lesse power over him. And we have the same use of the word in this book, chap. 20. ver. 17. where Zophar tells the hypocrite, that God will deprive and strip him of every good thing. He shall not see the rivers, the floods, the brookes of honey and butter; It is a rhetoricall expresson, comparing the affluence of outward things, to floods, and rivers and brooks, which send forth their streames plentifully; as if he had said, though there be great store of honey and butter (those two are specified for the rest) though [Page 606] there be rivers, brooks and streames of these commodities, yet he [...] shall see none of them, that is, he shall not enjoy or tast a drop of Sicut Graeci [...], & La­tini bonum, a­liquando pro pulchro, com­modo & utili usurpant. Isa subinde He­braei vocabu­dum, Tob, Fa­gius, in Gen. 2. 18 them. That unbeleeving Lord, is told by Elisha, that he should see plenty in Samaria the next day, but should not eate thereof, 2 King. 7. 2. Not to see, is not to eat; and he that sees, but eates not is not releeved, but troubled at the sight.

Mine eye shall not see good. What good? when a man dies, shall he see no more good? we see but little good while we live, and the greatest good, is to be seen when we die: or rather while we live, what doe we see but evill, and when the Saints die, what have they to see but good? how is it then, that Iob saith, when I die, mine eye shall not see good? what miserable creatures were we, if there were no good to be seen, beyond the line of this life? our richest stock of comfort, lyes in the good we shall see hereafter, which is therefore called, the blessed-making vision; And Iob knew well enough, that his eyes should see good after death, for he saith (chap. 19. 27.) with these eyes shall I see God; he knew also his soule had an eye to see good (and a better good then ever he saw in the world) while his body lay in the grave. Then, his meaning of, Mine eye shall no more see good, is, no more worldly good, none of † these good things, which I have seen; I shall be above the smart of earthly sorrows, and above the sence of earthly joyes. Good is either natural, or civill, or spirituall; When God created the world, he looked upon all that he bad made, and he saw that all was very good: Civill good, is the or­der, peace and prosperity of the world, death stops the sight of all this good. As for eternall or spirituall good, death cannot close or dimme the eye against those objects.

Then here is no plea for Atheists against the resurrection, nor any, against the soules Being, or being awake, till the resurrection. Iob speakes only about the speare and course of nature; when man dies naturally, and is in the state of the dead, he enjoyes nothing, he acts nothing according to the estate of the living, In his & si­milibus locis, Scriptura in telligenda est de statu mortu­orum in morte quis consitebi­tur tibi? post re­surrect [...]onem pii laudabunt Deum, sed ante illam, quamdiuerunt in sepul­chro, nemo con­fitebitur ei ani­ma & corpore simul, Drus, Iuxta raturae cursum hic lo­quitur, regans rediturum [...]o­minem ubi hine excessit Re [...]ur­rectio mortuo­rum divinum & supra naturam opus est, quo hic non respicit, nu­tu [...]e tantum consuctum or­dinem afferens, quomodo intel­lïgend [...] sunt q [...]aecun (que) talia in hoc libro in Psalmis, & a­lijs Scripturae libris, occurrunt. Psal. 115. 17. The dead praise the not, &c. there is no work, device or bu­sinesse at all in the grave, Eccl. 9. 10. The hand works not, the tongue speakes not, The eye shall no more see this good.

Iob expresses himself by an act of the eye, which carries the greatest strength for refreshing to the whole man. All the joy and pleasure we shall have in Heaven, comes in by sight, we shall see him as [...]e is; The heholding of God in Christ, is the beatificall [Page 607] vision, much of the good which we have in this world, comes in by the sense of seeing; and all the good of the next is placed in see­ing; therefore he doth not say, I shall no more taste good, or no more feele good, but no more see good, Per Analogi [...] ad summi boni possessionem, quae in visione consistit aliorum honorum, posses­sio rectè dicitur videre bona. because the chiefest good, eternal good, consists in vision, therefore proportionably our pre­sent good doth so likewise.

Sick Hezekiah speaks in the language of sick Job; I said, I shall not see the Lord, even the Lord in the land of the living; I shall behold man no more, with the inhabitants of the world, Isa. 38. 11. When Hezekiah thought he should die, he describes the state of the dead by a deprivation of all those comforts which are taken in, by the sight of the eye. But you wil say, how saith he, I shal not see the Lord? He doth not say absolutely, I shall not see the Lord? But with a modification, thus, I shall not see the Lord, even the Lord in the land of the living. But did Hezekiah see the Lord in the land of the living, or while he lived? Yes, as Mo­ses saw him that was invisible, so did Hezekiah: God makes him­self visible to the Saints in this life. Though God cannot be seen in his essence in Heaven, much lesse on earth, yet he is seen in his works, in the acts of his providence, and in his ordinances; we may see the goings of God in the Sanctuary, and behold the beau­ty of the Lord, while we enquire in his Temple, Psalm 27. 4. So that when Hezekiah saith, I shall not see the Lord in the land of the living; his meaning is, I shall not behold God in his great works, and in the ordinances of his holy worship, and in the Con­gregations of his holy people. In all these God is visible, and most in the last; and therefore he saith, I shall behold man no more, with the inhabitants of the world; God is visible in all creatures, but most in man, and among men, most in his Saints, and among his Saints most, when they meet in the comely order of his house and worship; The ignorant and unlearned coming into such a sacred throng; sees so much of God, that he is convinced and goes away reporting, that God is in them of a truth. In Christ is seen the brightnesse of his Fathers glory, and in the Saints much of the beau­ty of it is seen. Christ is the express image of his person, and in the Saints so meeting, much of his image is expressed.

First, in that Job betakes himself to God, O remember that my life is wind, &c. Observe, That

In our distresses it is better to cry to God, then to complaine to creatures. God is usually the last, but he is alwayes the best re­fuge, [Page 608] when we have told over the story of our sorrowes and sad condition, and powr'd our wants into the bosomes of our most faithfull friends; yet, this Apostrophe is sweetest to the soul, when we can turn unto God, O remember me. It is said of He­zekiah in his sicknesse, that he turned himself unto the wall and prayed, he turned from the people, from those that were about his bed, unto the wall; why, what was the wall to him? Or what could the wall doe for him? surely nothing. As good turne to an Idol for helpe or ease, as to a wall, yea such a turn to the wall, turnes the wall into an idol; Good Hezekiah had no thought of the wall, nor had he any message to any image, hanging there. But as 'tis probable, many of his loving Subjects and servants were weeping about the bed of their sicke King, and he had been dis­coursing of his disease, and telling them of his sicknesse, but at last he turns to the wall; that is, he leaves speaking to the company, and turnes away from them, that he might have communion with God, and his first word of prayer, is, the same with Jobs, Remem­ber now O Lord, Isa. 38. 3. Creatures are but creatures, and when they have done their best for us, it may be they can doe no good for us; when they have tried all their skill, and all their strength, and stirred the utmost of their abilities, to give us coun­sell and ease, we must say to them all, stand by, and come to Iobs Turne, O Lord remember. That man is most to be bemoaned, who can make his moane to man only. He, who knows not how to complaine to God, or to speake out his sorrowes, and his griefes in the eare of Christ, shall gaine little, (though he receive much) by complaining to the creature. But so long as we have a God to turne to, and spread our cause before, though men turne from us, yea, though they turne against us, and forget us, yet it is enough, that we have said, O Lord remember.

Secondly, from the matter, which Iob puts God in mind of, namely his naturall frailty and fleeting condition, that he was a pas­sing wind. Observe,

It is an argument, moving the Lord to compassion, to mind him of the frailty of our condition. There is no argument from our selves, so effectuall, to draw out the bowels of Gods compassi­ons toward us, either in regard of our spirituall or temporall estate, as this, to tell him how fraile we are; The Psalmist shewes this the motive of mercy often to that ancient people the Jewes, Psal. 78. 38. He being full of compassion forgave their iniquity, and [Page 609] destroyed them not, yea many a time turned he his anger away, and did not stirre up all his wrath; But what moved the Lord to deale thus with his people? What was it, out of himselfe? We know, the inward moving cause was his own free-grace, but what did he look upon abroad in the creature? He remembred that they were but flesh, A wind that passeth away, and commeth not againe. Jobs argument to a letter. He considered how easily and quickly they might be destroyed, and therefore he destroyed them not, Psal. 103. 14. Like as a father pittieth his children, so doth the Lord, &c. Why, what stirr's up this pity? For he knoweth our frame, and he remembreth that we are but dust; Now, that which God himself makes the argument, all the argument in us, of his turning to us in mercy; that we should mannage, especially as our argu­ment, when we turn to him in prayer. Should we plead before God our perfections, and say, Lord remember our holinesse, our zeale, our prayers, our teares, our fastings and humiliations, could any of this move God, or be any attractive of his compassions toward us? If we will plead our perfections; God will despise our pray­er. Our strongest argument is to say, we are weake, and to tell God we are sinfull, prevailes more, then to tell him, we are righ­teous: We shall gaine most by saying we are unprofitable ser­vants.

But did not Hezekiah, entreat the Lord to remember that he had walked before him in truth and with a perfect heart, and done that which was good in his sight? Isa. 38. 3. And doth not Nehemiah use the like plea, Chap. 13. 14, 22.

I answer, first, that, these were the best, most the spirituall and powerfull pleadings with God is not proved, because used by good men. Grace doth not act alwaies at the height, nor bring out choisest it's treasures at all times.

Secondly, they move the Lord to remember what good they had done, but they doe not move the Lord by that remembrance to doe them good. Hezekiah was so far from rejoycing in his own righ­teousnes: that the text saith, He wept sore. And Nehemiah with the same breath, desires the Lord to remember what he had done, and to spare him, according to the greatnesse or multitude of mercy. He, that when he hath done best, beggs a multitude of mercies to spare him, is farre enough from challenging justice to reward him.

Men, that are but ingenuous, will be moved most with a sight or report of anothers weaknesse. The beggar speaks most effectually [Page 610] by his rages and sores. The Woman, 2 Sam. 14. 14. who was hi­red to move David for the bringing back of Absolom, useth this argument, For we must needs die, and are as water spilt upon the ground, which cannot be gathered up again; As if she had said, Sir, if you will contend with your Sonne, thus, alas, his life is but water, and he will dye, for this is the common condition of man­kind; therefore be compassionate and pittifull to him, fetch home your banished. This motive takes much upon the heart of God, as in regard of particular persons, so of a people in generall, Deut. 32. 36. The Lord shall repent himself for his servants. But when will he repent himself? When he seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up or left. When they have no power and strength, and there is none shut up, that is, when they have no fort, no strong places to defend themselves in, but even lie open to the rage and malice of the adversary, and are ready to sinke ut­terly, then the Lord takes this, both as an argument and a season for him, to repent of the affliction of his people; that is, to change the way of his administrations towards them. This pro­mise was in part made good to Israel in the dayes of Jeroboam, Sonne of Joash, 2 King. 14. 26. The Lord saw the affliction of Is­rael, that it was very bitter, for there was not any shut up, nor any left, nor any helper in Israel.

Thirdly, speaking of the world, he saith, Mine eye shall no more see good. Observe then,

That worldly things are good things. In their sphear and pro­portion, they are good. Abraham minds the rich man, Luke 16. Sonne remember, that thou in thy life time receivedst thy good things. Therefore, we are to use the world, and all the creatures in it, as the good things of God, and the goodnesse we see in crea­tures, should raise us up, to admire the goodnesse of the Creatour; if goodnesse be stamped upon present and temporary things, how good are things eternal?

Fourthly, Mine eyes shall no more see good. Observe;

After this life there is no more use, or enjoyment of worldly things. The things of the world are but for the world; Mine eyes shall no more see, I shall no more enjoy or use these good things. Consider what it is you lay up, when you lay up the things of this life, you lay up those things, which after a while your eyes shall see no more; you lay up those things, which after a few daies; you shal have no more use of; you shal have no use at [Page 611] all of your gold, no use at all of your silver, no use at all of your apparel, no use at all of your goodly houses, no use at all of your rich furniture, no use at all of your lands, you shall have no use of all these good things: Consider then what it is you lay up, a time is coming, when you shall say of them all, I shall no more see, I shall no more use and enjoy any of these good things. Therefore be so wise as to improve this time, which passes like a Weavers shuttle and a blast of wind, to lay up such good things, as your eyes shall see, when you are laid down in the grave; lay up spiri­tual good things, lay up your portion in Christ, make him yours, and then when you die, and lie down in the grave, you may say, we have good things, yet to see; our best sight is to come, even such a sight, as eye hath not seen. Such a sight, as to which the glo­ry of all the Princes of the world is a meer Pagean tree. And so much of Jobs Apostrophe to God.

The next verse is a further description of the state of the dead.

Verse 8. The eye of him that hath seen me shall see me no more; thine eyes are upon me, and I am not.

In the former verse, Job had said his own eyes should see no more good, now he saith, that the eyes of others shall see him no more; The eye of him that hath seene me, shall see me no more. It is a great part of the glory and comfort which men take in the world, to be seen of men. As we take in our comfort by seeing, so Ponit bic duo, ut significet quod non rever­tetur ad con­versationem hu­manam, quae maximè consi­st it in videre & videri. Visus cum sit subtilior, sensu­um principatum tenet in vita sen­sibili. Aquin. Me quaere [...]t quem aspiciant, bumanitus di­ctum. by being seen. No man would put himself into goodly cloathing were it not, that he goes abroad in company to be seen, and knows others will be looking upon him. Now as Job sets forth the vanity of the creature and of this life, because he should see none of it, when he died, so, because when he died, others should see him no more, all his beauty, riches and good things, must be buried with him. There is an elegancy in putting these two together, to see and be seen. Death stops both, it takes us from seeing, and it takes us from being seen. As all the good we have will be hid from our eyes, so all our glory and excellency will be obscured from the eyes of others in the dark chambers of the grave.

Thine eyes are upon me, and I am not.

Job speaks of a three-fold eye. 1. Of his own eye, Mine eye shall see no more good. Verse 7.

[Page 612] 2. Of the eye of men, The eye of him that hath seen me shall see me no more.

3. Of the eye of God, Thine eyes are upon me; and I am not. He doth not say, Thine eyes are upon me, and thou shalt not see me. Gods eye looks into the grave, and can see there; when we are out of the eyes of men, we are in the eye of God; therefore he saith, Thine eyes are upon me, and I am not; as if he had said, Lord, if thou shalt defer a little to help me, and then shouldest come to look for thy Job, I shall be dead, I shall be laid in the grave, I shall not be capable of remedy, if my remedy be deferr'd: it is too late to give a man a cordial when he is dead: Thou shalt Tuornm benefi­ciorum, si forte cupias (humani­tus loquitur cum occulto questu neglectus sui) uon ero capax. Cocc. not have a Job to helpe, if thou dost not help him quickly. Some understand it in a spiritual sence, Thine eyes are upon me, as if he should say, Lord thine eyes are upon me, to search me, and try out my wayes, and alas I am not, I am not able to stand before thy justice, before thy pure eyes, which can behold none iniquity. But rather take it as an appeal to God, whether or no he were not near death. Thou Lord seest I am as a dead man; as a man not to be numbred among the living. Therefore if thou wilt deliver me, let thy loving-kindnesse speedily prevent me, for I am brought very low. As a sick man in some acute disease hastens his Physiti­an, Sir, give me somewhat presently, or I am gone, you cannot but see I am a borderer upon death. Thine eyes are upon me, and

I am not.

That is; I am not alive, I am not among the children of men. Not to be, doth not import a not-being, but a not appearing, I am not as I was, nor can I long be at all. Rachel wept for her chil­dren, because they were not; Josephs brethren said to their Father, Joseph is not; and Job himself in the 21. of this Chapter, explains this to be his sence, Thou shalt seek me in the morning, and I shall not be; Death is a great devourer, it sweeps all that appears of man, into the grave. The world shall no more enjoy him, nor he the world, this is mans not being, when he dies: as the two following verses further explain by an elegant similitude.

[Page 613]

Verse 9. As the cloud is consumed and vanisheth away; so he that goeth downe to the grave shall come up no more.

10. He shall return no more to his house; neither shall his place know him any more.

Job having moved the Lord to take notice of, and compassionate his transitory condition, his life being but like the hastening wind. He gives us another comparison to the same sence and purpose; There, his life was but a wind, and here it is but a cloud, As the cloud is consumed and vanisheth away, so he that goeth down to the grave, shall come up no more, &c.

The cloud] in a naturall notion, is a thick and moist vapour, drawn up from the earth, by the heat of the Sunne to the middle region of the aire, and by the coldnesse of that heaven­ly country (where snow and haile, &c. are made and stor'd up) is further condens'd, congeal'd and thickn'd, and so hangs or moves partly from natural causes, the Sunne and wind, but espe­cially by supernatural, the mighty power and appointment of God, like an huge mountain in the aire. To this cloud Job compares the vanishing estate of this life.

As the cloud (such a cloud, as you see hanging in the aire) is [...] consumed, or spent: The same word is used at the 6. Verse, My life is spent without hope. A cloud comes to it's height, and then 'tis quickly disperst and vanisheth away; The letter of the Hebrew [...] Ambulavit, i­vit, & per me­talepsin de re­bus evanescen­tibus, intereun­ti bus, &c. is, It goeth or walketh away. The walke of the clouds is accor­ding to the walk of the winds, we cal it the Rack of the clouds. When the Heavens are (as it were) all masked with clouds, and a black vail or curtain drawn between us and the Sun, the winds in a little time dissipate and scatter them.

It is usual in Scripture to compare those things, which are vani­shing & suddenly consumed, to clouds, In which sence (Isai. 44. 22.) the sins of the Saints are compared to a cloud, and the pardoning of their sins to this consuming and scattering of the cloud, I have blot­ted out as a thick cloud thy transgressions, and as a cloud thy sins. A cloud is but a kind of a blot in the pure parchment-roll of the skies, I am sure a cloud of sinne is a foule blot in the roll of our lives, Blot a fair writing, and you cannot read it, but blot out the blots, and then 'tis legible again: yet, the blotting out of sinne, intimates it fair written, as an evidence or a record against us, [Page 614] till a pardon blots it out. In which sence, Christ is said to have blot­ted out the hand-writing of Ordinances that was against us, Col. 2. 14. Thy sins (O Israel, so the Lord seems to speak in the Prophet) are as a cloud to hinder the shining of the light of my countenance upon thee: like blots, they hinder thee, from reading the evidences of my favour, or they stand like evidences of guilt against thee. But I have blotted out this cloud, that is, I have pardon'd thy sins, and by the breath of my favour and free grace, scatter'd thy transgressi­ons, with all the evils and sequels, which they naturally bring forth. So that, now the light shines fair and warm upon thee; the eviden­ces, which were against thee, cannot be read, and thou mayest read the evidences of my love, and mercy towards thee. The sins of the Saints are but vanishing clouds, whereas sin in it selfe, and the sins of all those, who are out of Christ, are an abiding cloud, they are a cloud firme and immoveable, like a mountain of brass, or a rock of stone. Sins make such a cloud, as no power in Heaven or earth is able to consume, but the power of mercy, and a gale of love, breathing through the covenant of Grace.

And, as the life of man is compared by Job to a cloud, so, to that which is the matter of the cloud, by the Apostle James, Chap. 4. verse 14. where he puts the question, what's the life of man? Is it not (saith he) even a vapour that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away? A vapour is exhaled from the earth by the heat of the Sunne, and is the matter out of which the cloud is made. Mans life is not only like a cloud, which is more condense and strong, but like those thin vapours, sometimes observed arising from moorish grounds, which are the original of clouds, and more vanishing then clouds. Even these, are but vanishing enough, to shadow the vanishing, decaying, quickly dis-appearing life of man. As the cloud consumes and vanishes, (the next words speak out the mind of the comparison.)

So he that goeth down to the grave, shall come up no more.

The grave is a descent; And the word which is here used for the grave, is Sheol, about which many disputes are raised among the learned: The root of it signifies to desire, or to crave with ear­nestness, and the reason given is, because the grave is always craving and asking; Though the grave hath devoured the bodies of mil­lions of men, yet it is as hungry as it was the first morsel, still it is asking and craving: The grave is numbred among those things [Page 615] which are not satisfied, Prov. 30. 16. In the Greeke of the new Testament, it is translated Hades, which by change of letters, some form out of the Hebrew Adam, and Adamah the earth, unto which God condemned fallen man to returne, Gen. 3. 19. We find this word Sheol, taken five wayes in Scripture.

1. Strictly and properly for the place of the damned, Prov. 15.

II. Hell and destruction are before the Lord, how much more [...] then all the hearts of the children of men. God looks through the darkness of hell, which is utter darkness. Tam infernus quam sepul­chrum [...], Sept. Status mortuorum vel sepalchrum, nam ut anima de corpore [...] de sepulchro u­surpatur, Ps. 16. Drus.

2. It is put Metaphorically, for great and extream dangers, or miseries which seem irrecoverable and remediless; these are figu­ratively called hell, because hell properly taken, is a place from whence there is no recovery; There's no release from the chaines of darknesse, all changes are on earth, Heaven and hell know none: When David praises the Lord (Psalm 86. 13.) for delivering his soul from the lowest hell; he meaneth an estate on earth, of the low­est and deepest danger imaginable; Mercy helpt him at the worst. To be as low as hell, is to be at the lowest.

3. The word signifies the lower parts of the earth, without re­lation to punishment. Psal. 139. 8. If I go down into hell thou art there. He had said before, if I ascend up into Heaven thou art there; by Heaven he meanes the upper Region of the world, without any respect to the estate of blessednesse; and hell is the most opposite and remote in distance, without respect to misery. As is he had said, let me go whither I will, thy presence finds me out.

4. It is taken for the state of the dead, whether those dead are in the grave or no, Psal. 30. 3. Isa. 38. 18, 19. Gen. 37. 35. In all which places, to go out of the world, is to go to Sheol. Jacob in the text alledged, Gen. 37. 35. said, he would go down into the grave to his son, mourning; yet Jacob thought his Son was de­voured by a wild beast, he could not goe down into the grave to his son, for the bowels of a wild beast was his supposed grave, but he meaneth only this, I wil even die, as he is dead. So Numb. 16. 33. where that dreadful judgement of God upon Korah, Da­than and Abiram is storied, it is said, that they, their sheep and their oxen, and their tents, and all went down into Sheol, that is, they were all devoured and swallowed up. But

5. Sheol signifies the place where the body is layed after death, namely, the grave, Prov. 30. 16. Man hath a demension of earth [Page 616] fitted to the dimensions of his body; this portion or allotment is his Sheol. Yet, it signifies the grave only in generall, as it is na­tural to man-kind, not that grave which is artificial and proper to any particular man, this the Hebrew expresses by another [...] word: He that goeth down to the grave, goes to his long home, to a house out of which he is never able to see or make his way, and Ainsw. in Gen. 37. therefore it followes;

He shall come up no more. No? that's sad news indeed, to go down to the grave and come up no more. Are all the hopes of man shut up in the grave? and is there an utter end of him when his life ends? Shall he come up no more?

Many of the Greek writers tax Job as not acquainted with the doctrine of the Resurrection, as if he either knew not that mystery, or doubted, at this time, of it: And some of the Rabbins say plain­ly, Hic abnegat Iob resuscita­tionem mortu­orum. Rab. Sol. Non negatur resurrectio ad vitam, sed ad similem vitam, Pined. he denied it: But he is so cleare in the 19th Chapter, that we need not think him so much as cloudy here: And if we look a lit­tle farther, himself will give us the comment of this text: When he saith, he shall come up no more, it is not a denyal of a dying mans resurrection to life, but of his restitution to the same life, or to such a life as he parted with at the graves mouth: They who die a natural death, shall not live a natural life again; therefore he addeth in the next verse;

Verse 10. He shall return no more to his house.

He doth not say absolutely, he shall return no more, but he shall return no more to his house, he shall have no more to do with this world, with worldly businesses or contentments, with the la­bour or comforts of the creature, or of his Family; He shall return no more to his house.

But some may say, how doth this answer the comparison, That as the cloud is consumed and vanisheth away, so he that goeth down to the grave, shall come up no more; for we find another descrip­tion of clouds, Eccles. 12. 2. where the text saith, that, the clouds return after raine: So that it seems, though clouds vanish and are consumed, yet they returne and come againe. The clouds are like bottles full of raine, or spunges full of water, God crushes these spunges, or unstops these bottles, and they are emptied, and in emptying vanish away: but yet Solomon affirms, the clouds re­turn after raine, how then doth Job say, that as the cloud vanish­eth, so man goeth to the grave and returns no more?

In that place of Ecclesiastes, Solomon is only giving us a de­scription of old age, and the sad condition of man in it; he calleth it the evil day; and wisheth men would be wise to consider their latter end, remembring their Creatour, and laying up a good foundation, before those evil dayes overtake them, before the light of the Sun, and Moon, and Stars be darkened, and the clouds return after the raine; In old age, the clouds returne after the raine, thus: as in some very wet time, when we think it hath rained so much, as might have spent and quite exhausted the clouds, or drawn those bottles dry, yet you shall see them return again, it wil rain day after day as fast as ever; so in old age, when rheumes distil so freely, that you would think an old man had emptied himselfe of all, yet the clouds will return again, and flouds of wa­tery humours overflow. Thus the clouds of old age returne; And in this sence the clouds of the ayre returne, after they are con­sumed and spent into raine: But how doth a cloud return? not the same cloud numerically, that cloud, which was dissolved doth not return; the same Sunne goes down, and vanisheth out of our sight in the Evening, and returneth again, the same indivi­dual and numerical Sun, in the morning; but that numerical cloud which vanished, comes not again: Thus man vanisheth, and re­turns as the clouds return after the raine, that is, after one genera­tion Si id quod nun­quam fui [...], nunc est, quomodo quod nunc est, post interritum dcnuo fore ne­gatur? Nam si hoc mirum, il­lud magis mi­rum videtur of men are dead, they return again in their children, another generation springs up: other return to life there is none, till all shal return at the general judgement of quick and dead. As now we are, who never were, so all shal return, who were, but are not. It was a witty answer of a learned Jew, disputing with a heathen Phi­losopher, who opposed the Resurrection: If that (saith he) which never was in the world, now is; is it strange, that, that which now is, should be again, after it is not in the world? If this be a wonder, the other is much more wonderful.

Neither shall his place know him any more.

His place, may be taken three wayes. First, For the calling and condition of a man in this life, that's the place of a man, a mans Calling is his place. Or secondly, Locally for his house or inheri­tance, where he dwelt; he shall come to that place no more. Or thirdly, Place is taken for dignity, magistracy, for the eminency of a mans calling, therefore we say of a Magistrate or a man in ho­nour, he hath a Great place, or he is a man of place and Rank, in all [Page 618] these senses, his place shall know him no more.

His place shall not know him. That's an elegancy of the holy language. Places are without life and without sense, much more without knowledge; knowing is an act of reason, how is it then said, his place shall know him no more? Did it ever know him? Ther's a double figure in it: Some understand it by an Hypallage, or trans­mutation of the words, his place shall know him no more, that is, he shall know his place no more. So that is expounded (Psal. 103. 16.) The place thereof shall know it no more, speaking of man passing away like a wind. So Psal. 37. 10. Thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be; his place shall not be; places continue while the world continues; Then, his place shal not be, is, he shall not be in his place. Or secondly, understand it by a Prosopopeia, (frequent in Scripture) which is the imitation of life, by things without life: when a place takes upon it the person of a man, or when a place acts or imitates the speech of a man: sence and reason are often ascribed to things without life, and so the meaning of, his place shall know him no more, may be Quosi diceret, ipsae res inani­ma quae ser­viura & pa­rent ad nutum mortalibus, mortuis tamen null usui sunt, Illos non ag­noscunt domi­nos. Ea enim est vis verbi cognoscendi & non cognoscendi. conceived thus: When a man lives and comes home to his house, his house (as it were) welcomes him home, and his place is glad to entertain him; as in the Psalme, the little hils are said to re­joyce at the showers, so, when a man comes home, his house and all he hath, have as it were, a tongue to bid him welcome, and open armes to receive and embrace him; but when he dies, he shall re­turn no more, and then his place shall know him (that is, receive him) no more.

Observe from this briefly (because it is a similitude of the same importance with that opened in the former words) first,

That death is the conclusion of all worldly comforts and rela­tions. As the cloud vanisheth and returneth not, so (in that sence) there is an utter conclusion of man, he is gone, and there is no returning; God by his almighty power, hath fetched back some, and the vanishing clouds have been brought again: so Lazarus (and others at the death of Christ) was raised from the grave; but in a natural way, death seizeth all fast for ever: your places, your rela­tions, your credits, your Friends shall know you no more, or give you farther entertainment. Secondly observe;

That God hath given us not only the book of Scripture, but the book of the creature, therein to learn and read our own frailty and mortality. The creatures preach what man is, and that is a [Page 619] reason why the holy Ghost spends so much time; and is so frequent in giving us the measure of our selves by creatures; these are every houre in our eye, we meet with, and see, and handle, and feel them continually: The wind, the vapours, the clouds, set forth what we are, When I consider (said David, Psal. 8. 3. 4.) the Heavens, the work of thy fingers, the Moone, and the Starres which thou hast ordai­ned, what is man that thou art mindfull of him? To consider the greatnesse of the works of God, should abase man; it should a­maze us, to remember, that God hath made such things for our use, who are our selves so uselesse (in comparison of what we ought) to God. And when man considers the Heavens and the earth, and weighs how many things there are in them, which set forth his frailty, he hath reason to cry out, O Lord what is man? Man is but a wind, a cloud, a vapour, even such a thing, as I see most pe­rishing and vanishing in the whole compasse of the creation. Psalm. 19. 1. The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth his handy work▪ The heavens are ex­cellent creatures, and full of glorious wonders, they speake the power and wisdome of God, they shew forth his handy work, they can be the work of none, but of God only; The clouds also shew forth the handy work and power of God, Psal. 147. 8. Who covereth the heavens with clouds: The hand of God drawes those curtaines, and puts that maske upon the face of Heaven.

But as the heavens declare the glory of God, so they publish and declare the weaknesse of man, the vapours and the winds shew forth, how fraile he is: As the invisible things of God, to wit, his eternall power and Godhead, are seen in the things which are made; God is (as it were) visible in the creatures; so likewise the frailty and mutability, the weaknesse and inconstancy of man, is visible in the things, which are created; we may reade a lecture of our own transitorinesse, in the most transitory texts of nature: And that is an admirable contrivance and complication of things, that out of the very same text of the creature, where the infinite wis­dom & power of God may be learned, man also may learn his own frailty: He that studies the creature much, shall find much of God and of himselfe, Some conceive when Isaac (Gen, 24. 63.) went forth into the field to meditate, that he studied the booke of the creatures, probably the holy man did so, but, we are sure he might. How will it shame those men at last, who know not God [Page 620] not themselves, when they have or might have had (without cost or travell) so many tutors and instructers.

JOB Chap. 7. Vers. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16.

Therefore I will not refraine my mouth, I will speake in the an­guish of my spirit, I will complaine in the bitternesse of my soule.

Am I a sea or a whale, that thou settest a watch over me?

When I say my bed shall comfort me, my couch shall ease my com­plaint.

Then thou skarest me with dreames, and terrifiest me through visions.

So that my soul chuseth strangling, and death rather then life.

I loath it, I would not live alwayes, let me alone, for my dayes are vanity.

IN the context of these six verses, we may take notice of foure things.

  • 1. Jobs violent resolution to complaine, ver. 11.
  • 2. His vehement complaint, ver. 12.
  • 3. An amplification of his sorrowes, ver. 13, 14.
  • 4. A renovation of his often repeated desires to die, and the te­diousnesse of his life, ver. 15. 16.

Therefore.] Job having in an apostrophe to God, shewed his weake condition; takes up a fresh resolution of complaining to God; Therefore I will not refraine my mouth, &c. as if he had said, The consideration of these things, is so farre from putting me to silence, that it doth rather enlarge my heart, and open my mouth to speake and complaine, once more; seeing death is by Gods appointment, the certain end of all outward troubles, and perceiving my self upon the very borders or brink of death, my body past cure, my estate irrecover­able and remedilesse; therefore I will complaine yet againe, I will yet farther lay open my misery before the Lord, and presse him to hasten me thorough the confines of this land of sorrow, that I may accomplish my dayes, and see an end of these troubles, for my soule is in great bitter­nesse.

I will not refraine my mouth.] The word signifies to stop, in­hibit [...] Proprie est con­tinere probibe­re, & cum ad liuguam & o­rationem refer­tur [...]ffert sup­pressionem quandam & cohibitionem eluctantis spi­ritus, & ser­monis, conantis se aperto ore effundere. or prohibit; Those writs which stay the processe of inferiour [Page 621] Courts, are called Prohibitions, and then no man may open his mouth more in that businesse, untill the Prohibition be dissolved or taken off: I (saith Job) will not give my self a prohibition, I will not silence or suppresse my sorrowes: I will give my heart full liberty to meditate, and my tongue to speake out my suffe­rings: Being emptied of all my comforts, I will surely take my fill of complainings. It will be some ease to me, to make known how I am pained. I will not refraine my mouth. That word is used (Isa. 58. 1.) Cry aloud spare not; when the Prophet is com­manded to tell the people of their sins, the Lord sets his tongue at liberty, spare not, thou art not silenced or limited, therefore, cry aloud; Theirs, were crying sins, and crying sins must have crying reproofs, loud sinners must not be whispered to, therefore, Cry aloud, spare not. I will not spare my mouth (saith Job) or refraine as we translate.

But I will speake in the anguish of my spirit, or in the straightnesse [...] ie. in angustiis spiritus mei, coarctat me spiritus pectore inclusus, pate­faciam liberum illi aditum [...] à radice [...] Proprie medi­tari, vel ex me­ditatione inte­rius animo con­cepta aliquid exterius agere loqui, orari, conqueri. Vocem edam querulam, mus­fitando & me­ditandi, Merc. of my spirit; I am in a straight, I am pent in my spirit, and unlesse I let my spirit out, my heart will breake; I must give it vent and ayre, I will speake in the anguish of my spirit.

I will complaine in the bitternesse of my soule. The word ren­der'd complaine, signifies to meditate, and so, to speake upon me­ditation, or to speake deliberately. It implies, first, a forming and fashioning of what we would say in our thoughts; Thoughts are the moulds of our words. Job intends not rash speaking: what he intended to speake, should be moulded, shapt and wrought in his heart, before brought forth by his tongue. Prayer is exprest by this word, because prayer ought first to be formed in the heart: Prayer is the manifestation of our desires to God; If the tongue speakes before the heart, before the heart makes up our requests, we take Gods name in vaine. Hannah takes up this word (1 Sam. 1. 16.) Count not thine handmaid for a daughter of Belial, for out of the aboundance of my complaint (or meditation, so the word is rendered) and greife, have I spoken. Hunnah was praying, her voice was not heard, only her lips moved which caused Eli to suspect and censure her for drunk or distracted; but she answers in words of turth and sobernesse, O my Lord, count not thine hand­maid a daughter of Belial, for though my voice hath not been heard, yet I have been speaking out of the aboundance of my com­plaint, that is, out of the aboundance of my meditation; my com­plaints are not the work of my tongue, but of my heart, and my [Page 622] lips moved not, untill my heart moved, my complaint is my medi­tation. Hence likewise that phrase of powring out prayer, Psal. 142. 2. I powred out my complaint before him; He that powres out, must have somewhat, yea much within, where there is a con­stant stream, there also is a fountain, I powred out my complaint, or my complaining prayer; it is the same word here, I have gathered the bitter waters of sorrow into my own heart, and now I powre them forth in complainings.

I will complain in the bitternesse of my soul. What the bitter­nesse Amarum non solum, dulci op­ponitur, sed e­tiam jucundo. Amariorem me fecit senectus, i. e asperiorem, Plau [...]. of the soule is, hath been expounded already in the third Chap­ter, therefore I shall not stay upon it: It notes only the height or extremity of affliction. Bitter is opposed to unpleasant, as well as to sweet: In the bitternesse of my soule: The affliction appeared most upon his body, but it afflicted him most in his soule. He speaks little of the pain of his body, in comparison of the trouble up­on his spirit, he insists principally upon that, I will speake in the anguish of my spirit, I will complaine in the bitternesse of my soule, not in the pains of my flesh, or sufferings of my body; and yet that forme of speaking, excludes not his sence and sensiblenesse of bodily paines, for a man may well say, his soul is in bitternesse by reason of the paines of his body.

Being in this condition, we see what his remedy was, he falls a cry­ing and a complaining before God, telling how it was with him.

Jobs complaints have been spoken of in former passages of the Book, and why he complaines, hath been shewed. An afflicted soule finds some ease, in complaining of affliction; To complaine out of impatience, distrust and hard thoughts of God is very sin­full; in that sence we must be silent, as David, Psal. 39. 9. when the hand of God was heavy upon him, I was dumbe, I opened not my mouth, because thou didst it; in reference to the dealing of God with him, David had not a word to say; Our Lord Christ (the great patterne of suffering) was as a sheepe before the shea­rer, dumbe, and opened not his mouth, no impatient speech came from him. Though the griefe of Job was very great, and so it might somewhat (as hath formerly been cleared) excuse the greatnesse of his complaint, yet, in this Job shewed himselfe a Docemur quan­tae sint hominis vir [...]s, sibi à Deo derelisti. Merc. man subject to like passions, as we are. Man thinks to get cure by complaining, but usually he gets a wound: What poore shifts are we poore creatures often put to? How often doe we entangle our selves because we are straightned? Though Jobs heart kept close [Page 623] to God in the maine, though his spirit was preserved untoucht of blaspheming, yet we find him touching too often, and too loud upon this string of complaining. He cannot be excused from some moti­ons of impatience, while we hear him setling upon these resolutions to take his fill of, or to let loose the reins of his passion to complain, I will complaine in the bitterness of my soul. Anguish is a very ill guide of the tongue. It must needs be troubled matter, which passion dictates. Observe further,

That when sorrow continues and hangs long upon us, it grows boysterous and resolute.

We have three wils in the text, as if Job had turned all his rea­son into Will, and his will into passion, I will not refraine; I will speak in the anguish of my spirit, I will complaine in the bitter­nesse of my soule; He was grown to a kinde of resolvednesse in his sorrow. It is as unsafe for man (in this sence) to will what Nec tamen is fuit Job. qui quod sibi licere non putaret pro­tervè ac proca­citer vellet ag­gredi. Meri. he doth, as to do what he will; we ought to will the will of God, but we must submit our own. We should not mourne over our afflictions, nor rejoyce over our comforts, but as God wils. Yet in this, the wil of Job was rather strong then pertinacious. He was not a man of that rough make, to oppose his wil against the wil and good pleasure of God, though that were a paine to him.

Having thus resolved to complain, he complains in this very high Language.

Verse 12. Am I a sea, or a whale, that thou settest a watch over me?

These are his first words, words full of deep complaint, like the sea, which, whether he was or no, he would be answered. Am I a sea? Tell me. His question is of like importance with that, at the 12. verse of the 6. Chapter, Is my strength the strength of stones, or is my flesh brasse? He expostulates with God, why hast thou laid such trouble upon me? Am I stone or brass that I should be able to bear it? And here like a sea swolne with bitter waters) in the bitterness of his soul he begins to break the bounds again, Am I a sea or a whale, that thou settest a watch over me?

A sea or a whale.

The sea and the whale are often joyned in Scripture, Psal. 104. 25, 26. O Lord how manifold are thy works, &c. the earth is full [Page 624] of thy riches, so is the great and the wide sea, there goe the ships, there is that Leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein. Againe, Psal. 74. 13. 14. Thou diddest divide the sea by thy strength, thou brakest the heads of the dragons in the waters, thou brakest the head of Leviathan in pieces.

But why doth Job speake this language? In briefe, the meaning is this. The sea, you know, is a mighty boisterous and unruly crea­ture, and the whale is the strongest, mightest and most dreadfull creature in the sea; the greatest of the creatures, whether upon sea or land. The sea is the most boisterous of all the inanimate creatures, and the whale is the most boisterous of all living crea­tures: So that here Job gives instance in two creatures, which are the most head-strong, violent and out-ragious in the whole crea­tion, The whale and the sea. And he sets forth his own weaknesse, by the Antithesis of these two creatures, surpassing all in strength with which God only is able to graple and encounter. And in as­king, Am I a sea or a whale, he may be conceived to speake thus, Lord thou seemest to deale with me in a way beyond all thy dea­lings with the children of men; Thou carriest thy selfe towards me, as if I were more proud, heady, hard to be reclaimed, then any man in the world; thou seemest to take such a course with me, as with the unruly sea, and with the boisterous whale, to keepe me in compasse. He speaks as if God laid too heavy an affliction upon him, and tooke too strong a course to tame him, or, as if he might be more gently dealt with, and that God needed not prepare such bonds and fetters for him, or lay such law upon him, as upon the mighty sea, and the monstrous whale.

But for the words in particular.

Am I a sea?

There are three things in the sea, specially considerable, at which Mare barbarum & indomitum elementum est. Job might have an aime here.

First, the turbulency of the sea; the sea is stormy and turbulent, so stormy and turbulent, that it threatneth to over-whelme all; to over-whelme the ships sailing upon it, to over-whelme the Visat est Deus conjecisse mare in carcerem, at (que) illi pedes, ac ma­nus constrinx­isie propte [...] quam exquisita dry land encompassing it, and it would doe both, if God did not bound it, if he had not said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no fur­ther, and here shall thy proud waves be staied; did not God put an everlasting law upon it, it would be lawlesse, Gen. 1. 10. the text saith, That the gathering together of waters, God called seas; [Page 625] God gathered them together, thrust them together into one place, and there set a watch upon them, put them in prison, bound them Deiproviden­tiam dioitur. Psal. 95. 4. in chaines, for he saw what an unruly element it was, and how soone it would disturbe all, if left to it's own guidance. So Job 38. 10. He hath set bounds to it, barrs and doors to keepe it in. He locks and bolts it in by his mighty power. And then Jobs mea­ning may be this. Am I an over-whelming tyrant or oppressour, a swallower up of the poore, &c. that thou dost thus imprison and restrain me?

Secondly, there is a wonderfull capaciousnesse in the sea: the sea is so bigge and broad, so extensive and vast, that it takes in all the waters that come off the land into it's bosome, and yet feeles no accesse. And then his meaning may be thus conceived, Am I able to drinke in all these flouds of sorrow, and rivers of affliction, which are let out and unburthen themselves upon me?

Thirdly, the sea is of mighty strength, though we say, weak as water; water is a weake element in one sence, yet in another, water is a strong element, so strong, that it beares all downe before it, and beares all the stormes that rage upon it. And so his mean­ing is, am I able to bear continuall tempest, perpetuall tossings and agitations. Wilt thou ever let loose the winds and gusts of trouble to blow thus furiously upon me?

Or (am I) a whale?

The word signifies any great and terrible creature, any monster [...] Vasta five stu­penda quae vis animantia sig­nificat, sive terrestria, sive aquati­lia sive aeria, Quidam Thin­norum nomen binc deducunt. whether of sea or land, but frequently, the whale; so Gen. 1. 21. God created great whales; and Lamen. 4. 3. The sea monsters, draw out their breasts; which some interpret the sea calfe. It is taken also for the dragon, which lives partly upon the earth, and partly in the water (Deut. 32. 3.) their wine is the poison of dragons; and so Jer. 51. 37. But place it either at land or sea, it notes the most fierce, devouring and cruell of all living creatures. Our Translations understand it of that huge stupendious sea-monster, the whale or Leviathan, Am I a sea, or a whale.

That thou setteth a watch (or a guard) over me?

The word signifies to watch a thing so narrowly, that it can neither escape, nor doe hurt: for upon these two reasons, watches and guards are set, we are afraid some will run from us, that others will hurt us, therefore we set a guard upon them. In this last sence, [Page 626] Job specially meaneth it, Thou settest a watch over me, as thou dost over the sea and the whale. Why doth God set a watch over these? It is that the sea should not hurt thc earth, that whales and sea monsters should not hurt man, sailing upon the sea, or destory the lesser fishes swimming there.

In the 39th Psalme ver. 2. the word is used for setting a watch [...] à radice [...] Custodire, ser­vare, significat custodism, un­di (que) circumclu­sam unde nullum patet effugium. upon the tongue, I have set a watch (saith David) upon my lips, &c. A man sets a watch upon his lips, least he should speake a misse, or least he should doe hurt or wrong in speaking, so (Ps. 141. 3.) the Psalmist desireth God to set a watch before his mouth, and keepe the doore of his lips, The tongue is a hurtfull instrument, as the Apostle James describes it, a little member, which hath a world of iniquity in it: Therefore the tongue being so hurtfull, it is a great part of grace, to keepe a watch over it, and a great part of our duty to begg of God to set a watch upon it, that it may doe no hurt, that it may not as a sea or a whale, swollow up our neigh­bours good name. Nehemiah (Chap. 4. 23.) made his prayer (a sweet conjunction) and set a guard or a watch; why was it? to keep off his wicked enemies from hurting him, and hindring the good work he had in hand.

Some translate it thus, Am I a sea or a whale, that thou shoul­dest inclose me in prison? It comes to the same sence, and the Circum dedisti me careere. Vul. Sicut carcer la­tinis a coercen­do, sic Hebraeis a custodiendo. word signifies a prison in divers texts of Scripture: prisons are pla­ces of watch and guard, from whence there is no escape or getting loose. Job thought himselfe a man kept in prison, as offenders are, The sea is a prisoner shut within banks and walls: as a man in pri­son cannot goe where he will, so neither can the sea. And the whale, of whom it is said, He takes his pastime in the sea, is, yet Gods prisoner there. And the truth is, all creatures, are in the prison of providence, the limits whereof they can no more goe be­yond, then a man that is bound (as Peter) with two chaines, and all the doors lockt upon him. Especially afflictions are imprisonments, sicknes is an imprisonment. A disease is sent like a Sergeant to attach a man: that shuts a man within his house, confines him to his cham­ber, and then binds him upon his bed, not to stirr, till God give a re­lease: sorrow is often called a Cord, Psal. 18. 4. The sorrows of death [...] (the cords of death, as the Hebrew is) compassed me about; And Psal. 116. 3. The sorrows of hell (or the cords of hell) were about me. And in that sence Job speaks of himselfe, why dost thou ar­rest and cast me into prison, binding me with the cords of these [Page 627] sorrows and sicknesses. So he complaines, Chap. 13. 27. Thou puttest my feet also in the stocks, and lookest narrowly to all my paths, thou settest a print upon the heeles of my feet. It is said of the woman (Luk. 13. 16.) that Satan had bound her eighteen years; she was bound with the cords of that infirmity, and kept as a poore prisoner those many yeares. From all we may collect the sence formerly hinted, that Job expostulates with God for using him, after the manner of a whale or a sea, as if he were a man so un­ruly, that nothing could tame and quiet him but such a severe course, as is used with beasts, or, as if he were a vexer and a de­vourer of his brethren, a very enemy to man-kind. Observe from hence.

First, in that Job saith, Am I a sea or a whale, that thou settest a watch over m [...]?

The providence of God watches over all his creatures; All their motions are by his permission or commission, they stirre, not but by his leave. The providence of God is his watch, and therfore it is called the eye of providence; and providence hath such an eye, as never sleeps nor slumbers; and therein lieth our security, that we have a providentiall eye open for us, when ours are shut and we asleep. Secondly, observe,

God expresses most care to keepe those creatures from hur­ting man, which are most apt to hurt man. We see Job instances in these two by name, the sea and the whale, and tels us, that God puts a guard upon them, he watches the least cretures, but it speaks most security to man, to hear that these are under a watch. The Lord watches over all wicked men, that they should not hurt his people, but such of them as are most harmefull, who are very seas and whales, men who would swollow and drowne his people with a deluge of rage and malice, over these the Lord watches in a special manner. His eye of jealousie (which is alwaies awake) is surely wakefull upon these. As the Lord hath a speciall eye upon the Saints to doe them good, so he hath a speciall eye upon the wic­ked, that they doe no hurt, or no more, then shall turne to good. Hence the Psalmist admonishes all, and it may have a particular application to wicked men, Psal. 32. 9. Be yee not as the horse, or as the mule which have no understanding: whose mouth must be held in with bit and bridle, lest they come neare unto thee. If the Lord sees men so brutish, that they will not be ruled by reason, he will rule them by rigour, He hath a whip for the Horse, a bridle [Page 628] for the Asse, and a rod for the fools back, (Prov. 26. 3.) A rocky shore for the sea, and a prison for the whale, rather then they shall come neare to hurt his beloved people.

Secondly, note, That

Man in the passion, and distempered sinfullnesse of his nature, is like the sea or the whale. A cruell man is as hurtfull, as the most hurtfull creature. In the place before noted, while man is warned, Not to be as the horse, or as the mule, which have no understanding. It is intimated that many men are; and it is a truth, that all men left to themselves would be like unto a horse or a mule, yea like unto a sea or a whale in doing mischiefe. The Prophet (Isai. 57. 20) compares wicked men unto the troubled sea that cannot rest. There is not in the whole compasse of nature, a clearer shadow of mans na­ture, than the sea.

First, The sea is very vast, and would (if let alone) be bound­lesse, Man is naturally vast and boundlesse in his desires, he is never satisfied.

Secondly, The sea is unstable, alwayes fleeting and moving, Gen. 49. 3. Dying Jacob characters Reuben thus, unstable at wa­ter: The heart of man is a moveable thing, ebbing and flowing forward and backward, tumbling up and downe, as the vast O­cean.

Thirdly, The sea is often provoked with stormes and tempests, it is the great stage, where the winds act their parts, and strive, as it is exprest in the Revelation. There are many winds striving upon the sea of mans heart continually, and therefore he is so boi­sterous, and so stormy; he hath winds within him, and winds from without him; The winds in his own bowels make the greatest commotions. The Apostle James questions (Chap. 4. 1.) Whence comes contentions and warrs, and fightings among you? Come they not hence, even of your lusts, that warre in your members? Lusts are as boisterous winds in the soule, which make it unquiet and un­ruly; strong lusts and desires like strong winds; and contrary lusts and desires like contrary winds, contend upon this sea. Most men are (Tit. 3. 3.) serving divers lusts and pleasures, not only many, but divers, or divers not only in number, but in nature, one lust as a contrary wind, striving with another, and so making a storme in the heart. And this storminesse is caused also by an out­ward blast; Satan blowes upon the heart, and the world blowes: so that, till the holy Ghost breaths heavenly gales to overcome and [Page 629] blow downe those stormes raised by the blast of stronglusts and temptations, the soul will be ever like a sea tumbled up and down, or, as the Apostle Jude speaks (vers. 13.) like a raging wave of the sea, foming out it's own shame.

And this is further considerable, that as the sea is most turbulent and tempestious, most loud and roaring about the bankes, where it is restrained; so man is most boysterous, where he is kept in and stopt; if God doe but set bounds to him by afflictions, he begins to rage at those bounds. It is that which Iob (in a degree) com­plain'd of, he thought God would bind and bound him in by affli­ction, and he began to be somewhat unquiet in his shackles. But when God sets bounds to wicked men by afflictions, and hedges up their way with thornes, they are angry indeed, & their corruptions breake forth the more, by how much the stronger banks are made against them. The great banke and bound, which God hath set up to keepe the lusts of men from over-flowing all, his word and will, his laws and ordinances, by which he speaks to man, as to the sea, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further; Against these bankes, the hearts of men naturally rage most. How doe their lusts roare and rise up against the holy and righteous will of God, there the fome of their corruptions is most wrought and cast up. As Paul himselfe acknowledged of his naturall condition, Rom. 7. 8. Sinne (saith he) taking occasion by the law, wrought in me, all manner of concupiscence, my lusts and corruptions were more mad, because they were more restrained, I was like the sea, which makes most noise at, and most assaults the bankes which stay it. So ver. 13. Sinne that it might appeare sinne, wrought death in me by that which is good; there was a good, a holy, and a righ­teous law set before me, but the basenesse of my heart was such, that I was the worse, for that, which taught me what was good, and should have made me better.

Further, man is as a sea in this, he ever casts up mire and dirt when he is moved, corruption moves, every stirring stirrs up the pudle of his heart. As he is a sea for largenesse, so he is a ve­ry sinke for filthinesse, Isa. 57. 20. The wicked are like the troubled sea, whose waters cast up mire and dirt.

Lastly, Covetous oppressours have a nearer resemblance to the sea in three things. They (as the sea) suck in all the rivers and streames of profit, which flow into them, from any part of the world, and yet are not filled.

Secondly, They (as the sea) wrack and over-whelme thousands, and are not at all moved with their out-cries.

Thirdly, They (as the sea) have huge treasures in their houses, yet all satisfies not their desires, they are as greedy, as if they were not worth a groat.

Looke upon man, in the other comparison, He is a whale, a de­vourer. In the worst of bruits, you may see the picture of mans nature. They who have power to doe what they will, and will doe (when their advantage is in it) to the utmost of their power; These are your Leviathans upon dry land. Senacherib was a mighty whale, gaping to swallow up the people of God, and therefore the Lord expresses his dealing with him in a word very sutable to this sence (2 King. 19. 28.) Because thy rage against me, and thy tumult is come up into mine eares, therefore I will put my hooke in thy nose, and my bridle in thy lips, &c. See how God uses him, Senacherib came raging and threatning to swallow all up; God uses him like an unruly beast of the earth, or like a devouring fish of the sea, He puts a hooke in his nose, It is said of Leviathan, that he scorns the hooke and the angle, Job 41. Canst thou draw out Leviathan with an hooke? implying that no hook, no tackle is strong enough to hold this sea-monster, but God hath a hooke can hold him. Some men are like this sea-monster, no tackling of mans making will hold them, no power under heaven can stop them; then the Lord prepares his engines and inctru­ments, he can make a hooke will catch Senacherib the great whale, as if he were but a sprat, I will put my hook into his nose, and turne him about or pull him up.

What devouring enemies have come out against us, threatning to swollow, or, as the Moabites said of the children of Israel (Num. 22. 4.) to licke up all that were round about, as the oxe licketh up the grasse of the field. Yea, they thought (as it is said of Levia­than) that they could draw up Iordan into their mouths, that is, remove the greatest difficulties, and overcome all opposition. But how often hath God put a bridle into the lips of the horse, and a hooke into the nose of these whales?

Further, if we consider the words, as Iobs question, in appli­cation unto himselfe, Am I a whale? Am I a sea? Ob­serve,

Man is apt to have good thoughts of himself. Iob would not be the whale, or the sea. Secondly note,

Man is apt to judge that God layes more upon him than there is need. Am I a whale or a sea? as if Iob had said, Lord thou needest not deale thus strictly and severely with me, or bestow so much care to watch me. I would have come in at a call, thou needest not have bounded me with these afflictions, and put such a hooke in my nose, a nod, or a beck would have fetched me in: Wise men suite their preparations to their occasion; we carry not out a peece of Ordinance to shoot at a flye, which we can kill with a phillip; so saith Job, Lord I need not all this, a little admonition, a little chastning, or a check should have reduced me, such are mans thoughts. But the most wise God, never layes more upon man, than he hath need of: when God streightens us with such affli­ctions, he seeth there is somewhat of the sea in us, he must bound us, somewhat of the whale in us, he must watch and bring us under. If we see God bestow more rods and blowes upon us, we must conclude, we could not be without them; some apprehend, that such is Jobs meaning in the sixteenth verse, What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him? as if he had said, it is too great an ho­nour for man to be afflicted by thy hand. If we see a King make great provisions of warre, to goe out against an enemy, we say he magnifies the enemy. It is an argument they have great strength, against whom we prepare great strength. So Job, Lord thou mag­nifiest me, thou makest me to be lookt at, as some powerful creature, a sea, a whale, against whom thou actest so much of thy power.

Job having, as he resolved, begun to complaine of his sorrows, now amplifies them.

Verse 13. When I say my bed shall cemfort me, my couch shall ease my complaint.

14. Then thou skarest me, &c.

He amplisies his sorrows upon this generall ground, because they were such, as he could not find any ease or abatement of, no not at any time, no not by any meanes; As if he had said, my griefe and my paine is so remedilesse, that, neither artificiall nor naturall meanes give me any ease; those things, which have the greatest probability of refreshing, yeeld me none. He instances in those ordinary wayes, which give sick and distempered bodies some abatement or intermission of their paines lying down upon their bed or couch; When I say, my bed shall comfort me, my chouch shall ease my complaint, As if he had said, while I was [Page 632] wrastling all day, and conflicting with my sorrowes, I yet had some hope to find comfort at night, and that I should meete with rest in my bed, but my hope failes me ever: or while in the day time my thoughts are overburthened, and my spirit overwhelmed within me, I think sometimes to deceive my paines a little, by ta­king a nap or a slumber upon my couch; but alas, my paines will not be deceived, when I say, my bed shall comfort me, my couch shall ease my complaint (I find in stead of ease, farther trouble, and in stead of comfort, terrours. For then) thou skarest me with dreames.

When I say my bed shall comfort me.

The word signifies to mourne and repent, as well as to comfort; [...] Doluit, paeni­tuit, per anti­phrasin, dolere desijt, consola­tionem invonit. because comfort usually followes holy mourning and repenting. Godly sorrow is the mother of spirituall joy.

In the words we have either that ordinary figure Prosopopeia, the fiction of a person, when acts of life and reason are ascribed to things without life; and so Job brings in his bed, as his friend spea­king to him, when I say my bed shall comfort me, my bed and I will conferre together, I am perswaded that will afford me a word of comfort: Or we may rather understand it by a Metonymy of the ef­fect, when I say my bed shall comfort me; Comfort is the common and usuall effect or benefit of lying down upon the bed: The bed is said to comfort, because ordinarily we find comfort in resting upon the bed; that being a meanes or instrumentall cause of comfort, is called a Comforter.

My couch shall ease my complaint.

The words are indifferently translated in Scripture, either for a bed, or for a couch; but if we take them distinctly, then the bed is the place, where we rest in the night, and the couch by day: When Job saith;

My couch shall ease my complaint; It notes his complaint or sorrow lay as a heavy burthen, or weight upon him; for the word [...] Levavit, e­vexit, sustu. li [...]. signifies to ease, or to lift up, or to ease by lifting up; if a man have a burthen upon him, the way to ease him, is to lift it off from him; so Job here, I lye down upon my couch, with a burthen of heavy sor­rows upon me, God knows, hoping my couch will be a means to take off that burthen a while, that I may have a little breathing, but (to my grief) I find, it doth not. The use of sleep, is to unburthen the [Page 633] spirit, and take off the load of cares; The word is used in that sense Magnum est peccatum me­um, prae tollen­do vel majus. quam ut tolli possit: Sept. [...], quam ut re­mittatur mihi quam ut susti­nere possim, Jun. Gen. 4. 13. about the sin of Cain, which lay upon him as a heavy bur­then, My sin (saith he) is greater than can be forgiven (so some translations) or greater than I can beare, word for word thus; my sin is greater than can be taken off; Forgivenesse is the taking sin off from us; it is the word here used for easing; my sin is grea­ter than I can be eased of; as if Cain thought his sin a burthen which the arme of mercy could not lift from his shoulders: Par­don is the easing of the conscience, sin the burthening of it; sin is a burthen, and so is sorrow. My couch (saith he) shall ease my com­plaint, by taking off, or at least intermitting the troubles, which [...] In retracta­tione five me­ditatione mi­seriae apud a­nimum. Loquen me­cum. cause me to complaine: or my couch shall ease me in my conplaint, when I am meditating, revolving and rowling my troubles up and down in my thoughts, then my couch and I am discoursing toge­ther, and reasoning out the matter, but no ease comes. We may ob­serve from hence, first,

That a man in paine, expects ease from every change. My bed (saith Job) shall comfort me, my couch shall ease my complaint, every thing he sees raises his hope, every man that comes to him, he lookes upon as a messenger of good newes, I said, this shall help me, and that shall help me; surely if I had such a thing (saith a sick man) it would do me good, if I had such meat I could eate, if I had such drink, my pallat would relish it, if I were in such an ayre, it would restore my health, and I should get up againe. As a Bee goes from flower to flower, to suck out somewhat, so man from instru­ment to instrument, from meanes to meanes, from bed to couch, still hoping to find reliefe or mitigation at least for his troubled mind, or pained body. Secondly observe hence,

That the most probable or proper meanes, are unable of them­selves to give us any ease or comfort. What is fitter to give a man rest than a bed? what is more proper to give one refreshing than a couch? but Job goes to his bed in vaine, and goes to his couch in vaine, nor this, nor that, nor tother administred him any help. Creatures are not able of themseves to give out the comforts com­mitted to them: Their common nature must be assisted with a spe­ciall word of blessing, or else they doe us no good. If God will command a bed to comfort us, it shall comfort us, if he will say to a couch, ease such a mans complaint, it shall ease his complaint; Job saith it, and his saying could not effect it: Nay, if God will say to a hard stone, give such a man rest, he shall rest and sleepe sweetly upon it; when another shall not get a wink of sleep upon [Page 634] a downe pillow: If God say to a prison, give such a man rest, he shall find rest there: if God speake to bonds and fetters, give such a man content and pleasure, he shall find not only contentment, but pleasure in bonds and fetters: if God say to flames of fire, re­fresh such as are cast into your armes, the fire will obey him, and refresh them: The most probable meanes cannot help us of them­selves, and a word from God will make the most improbable meanes helpfull to us, yea that which is destructive shall save us. For as God can create that good for us which is absent, so he can (as it were) uncreate the evill that is present; Providence can take away or suspend that hurting and destroying power which creation gave; no creature is able to help or to hurt, if God forbid and lay his restraint upon it. Bread cannot nourish, or cloathes warme us, if he say they shall not; poison shall not kill, or fire burne us, if he say they shall not. Mans saying is but saying; Gods saying is doing, Man may say to his bed, comfort me; to his riches and honours, content me; to his wife and children, please me; to wine and musick, make me merry; he may lay his com­mand, or send his desires to all creatures, and yet remaine com­fortlesse, contentlesse, mirthlesse. Pleasure it selfe will not please him, nor the having of his will, satisfie his mind at his own saying or biding. Observe in the fourth place;

That rest and sleepe, are from the especiall blessing of God. When I said to my bed, do it, the bed could not, sleepe is not from a soft bed, or from an easie couch. Psal. 127. 2. For so he giveth his beloved sleepe; that is, sleepe with quietnesse, or extraordinary quiet refreshing sleepe; which some have noted in the Grammar of the text; The Hebrew word Shena, for sleepe, being with (Aleph) a quiet or resting letter, otherwise, than is usuall in that language. He giveth sleepe to his Jedidiaths, as the word is there, alluding to one of the names of Solomon, The Lord gives sleepe sometimes as a love token to his beloved: The connection is somewhat obscure, the words before run thus, It is in vaine for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrow, for so he giveth his beloved sleep; how is sleepe a consequent of fruit­lesse labour, and eating the bread of sorrow, these rather hinder sleepe. Some referre it to the words of the first verse, Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vaine that build it; except the Lord keep the City, the watchman waketh but in vaine, for so he giveth his beloved sleepe, the Lord watches and takes a care of [Page 635] a City and family, and thus gives his people rest, and quiet sleep, they are not awakened with alarms or surprizes of the enemy: Others reade it thus, for surely he will give his, &c. that is not­withstanding the ungodly are eaten up with cares to provide bread for themselves and families to eate, yet without faile, the Lord of his meere mercy will give food convenient to his people by their labours, and quiet sleepe (which includes all inward content­ments) with it. So Prov. 3. 24. Thou shall lie downe, and thy sleep shall be sweet; And Psal. 41. 3. there is a speciall promise made to the sick man, or to him, who hath been a comforter of the sick, The Lord will make all his bed in his sicknesse; that is, God will make his bed easie and comfortable in his sicknesse. When we cannot sleepe, we use to complaine of our servants, and say, sure this bed was not made to night, or it was ill made; no man com­plains his bed was ill made, when he hath slept well: That his people in such a case may be sure of rest, the Lord condescends to that low office, the making of their beds, Therefore we are to receive sleep as a matter of speciall blessing, coming from the hand of God; he makes the bed in sicknes, and in health too; then blesse God for rest, and not your beds. Though we know sleep is the portion of man­kind and many times the worst of men have quiet and refreshing sleepe; yet no wicked man ever slept upon the pillow of this pro­mise, nor will God make the bed of the greatest Prince in the world, as such, which yet, he is ready to doe for his meanest servant; common comforts, are to some speciall mercies. As some enjoy riches and honour by common providence, while others enjoy them by vertue of a special promise, so it is with sleep, He giveth his beloved sleep.

But what found Job upon his bed? Instead of sleep and rest, he found skaring dreames and terrifying visions as it follows,

Verse 14. Thou skarest me with dreames, and terrifiest me with
[...] Stratus pro­stratus, contri­tus, per meta­phoram, terri­tus consterna­tus, mente ja­cuit, Et velut animi deliqri­um importat.
visions.

As if he had said, I find my selfe altogether disappointed and deceived, instead of being comforted, I am skared, instead of be­ing eased, I am terrified, my bed is to me as a very rack, and my couch my torment, or a little-ease.

Thou skarost me. The word signifies to be cast down prostrate to the ground with feare, or to be ground to powder with feare; And it is often rendred by that word, contrite, which notes, brea­king [Page 636] of the heart by godly sorrow! such a breaking is upon me, thorough the dreames which fall upon me, in, and breake my sleepe; If I have any sleepe, it is terrifying, and not refreshing sleepe.

Thou skarest me with dreames. That word springs from a [...] Spissus, crassus, per Metalepsin somniavit quia ex voporibus crassis prove­nit somnus quē somnia conje­quuntur. roote signifying thick vapours; because sleepe is caused by thick vapours ascending from the stomach to the braine, and closing up the sences; dreames usually come in that sleepe, and the stronger and thicker the vapour is procuring sleepe, the more we are subject to dreame.

And terrifyest me thorough visions. In the fourth Chapter I had occasion to speake at large concerning visions, therefore I shall not here insist upon that point, but referre the reader thither; I shall only say thus much, that these were not † visions as those be­fore treated of, for the revelation of any divine secrets, to enligh­ten the mind of man, but only visions of hellish horrour, to dar­ken and vex the mind of man. The Hebrew word signifies to see, whence the ancient Prophets were called (Chozim) Visiones istae quibus percelle­batur. Iob erant terriculamen­ta, lemures spe­cies, umbrae, spectra, manes, simulacra & alia hujusmodi a daemone pro­curata, quam­vis ipse Iob sibi á Deo inferri asserit, Cassia. Col. 7. c. 32. Seers. Our english word Gaze, hath neere affinity with it. And we call Star­prophets (who pretend skill in predictions, from the visions of the Heavens) Star-gazers.

Job had both dreames and visions, for in every dreame there is somewhat of a vision; There are many visions without a dreame, but there cannot be a dreame without a vision; An image or simi­litude, is alwayes represented to, or formed in the fancy, or else * [...] à radice [...] Hinc prophet [...]e cbozim viden­tes dicti. there can be no dreame: Jacob dreamed (Gen. 28. 12.) and behold a ladder set upon the earth, and the top of it reached to Heaven. The vision here spoken of, was (I conceive) the vision of his dreame, though some understand it of day or waking vision.

There is a two-fold cause of dreames: There is an inward cause, and an outward cause. And

The inward cause of dreames is two-fold:

  • 1. The accidentall motions of the fancie, of which a man can give no reason from any precedent agitation of mind or body.
  • 2. The setled naturall temperament and constitution of the body.

The externall or outward causes, are usually according to the objects with which, or about which we are conversant in the day time, the impressions of these kept in the fancie, are formed [Page 637] into dreames at night; such as the desires or distempers of the mind are, such often are our dreames.

Or take it thus. Dreames may have a five fold cause.

First, The natural temper of the body, and so from the variety of constitutions, variety of dreames are shaped; Cholerick, or Melan­choly, or Flegmatique, or Sanguin, produce their speciall dreames.

Secondly, Dreames are caused by the distempers of the body, either from intemperate drinking, or eating any kind of meate, or from the very eating (though moderately) of some meates, or from the diseases and sicknesses of the body; from this latter Jobs dreames were much encreased, and Satan took the advantage to raise fumes, and stirre the pudled humours of his body up into his braine, out of which his fancie formed terrible representations to his mind. As Melancholy is said to be the Devils bath, so are other diseased sickly humours; in them he sports himself, and vexes man.

Thirdly, There is a morall cause of dreames; such as the studies and businesses, labours and imployments, cares and disquietments Quaecun (que) men. tis agitat infe­stus vigorea per q [...]ietem sa­cer & arcanus refert veloxque sensus, Sen. in Octa. of a man are in the day, such often are his dreamings. As he works in the day, his fancie works in the night.

Fourthly, Dreames have a divine cause, and are immediately from God. The Scripture is full of instances, I need not stay upon them: Jacob had such a dreame, Gen. 28. 16. and Jospeh had ma­ny dreames from God: Hence his brethren called him in scorne, The dreamer, or a Captaine Dreamer, Gen. 37. 19. And not on­ly have godly men dreames from God, but heathens also, Pha­raoh and Nebuchnazzar, men of the earth received dreames from Heaven, of high concernment, revealing the counsels of God, con­cerning their own Kingdoms, and the latter about the state of all Kingdoms and Monarchies, till all the Kingdomes of the earth shall become the Kingdoms of that One, sole, Supreame Monarch, the Lord Jesus Christ.

Fifthly, There are diabolicall dreames, dreames which are from the Devill: Not that the Devill of himselfe is able to cause a dreame, he cannot stirre the fancie in the night, or tempt in the day, but as he hath a power given him; but permitted, he causes sometimes sinfull and fifthly dreames; as Augustine bewailes in the tenth book of his Confessions: sometimes terrible and trou­blesome Aug. confess. li. 10. Ca. 30. dreames, sometimes treacherous and deluding dreames. It is by some conceived, that the dreame of Pilats wife, Mat. 27. 19. [Page 638] was from the Devill: she comes to Pilat, and desires him to have nothing to doe with that Just man: for (saith she) I have suffered many things this night in a dreame, because of him. The reason why some conceive that dreame was from the Devill, is this, be­cause thereby Satan would have hindred the work of mans re­demption, if Christ had not died, and so by saving him, would have destroyed us all. I will not assert this; but it is cleare to the point in hand, that there are dreames from the temptations, motions and suggestions of the Devill, who hath a power over us, as God leng­thens out his chain both day and night.

But, when it is said, Thou skarest me with dreames, what dreames were these, divine or Diabolicall? Job speaks unto God, Thou skarest me with dreames: doubtlesse divine dreames had an influence upon his spirit, and left terrifying impressions there. But Satan having power to afflict Job which way he pleased, was instrumentall here: and yet Job saith to God, Thou skarest me. As before, when Satan by his instruments took away all from him, he said, The Lord hath taken; so here, when Satan vexed him with visions, representing horrid and fearfull spectacles, yet he saith; Thou skarest me with dreames, and terrifiest me with visions, as pointing still unto the power and providence of God, who hath all second causes, Satan and all, at his own dispose. Observe here, first,

That even our dreames are ordered by God. Though Satan be the instrument, yet we may say, Thou skarest me with dreames, and terrifiest me with visions. Job was not ignorant, that second cau­ses had a great power upon the body, to produce dreames and nightly fancies; he was not ignorant, that the strength of a disease might doe very much in this, and that Satan his former enemy was busie to improve the distempers of his body for the trouble of his mind: yet he overlooks all these (as he did before) and saith, Lord thou skarest me with dreames, and terrifiest me with vi­sions. Dreames are in the hand of God: As our waking times are in the hand of God, so are our sleeping times: when we are sleeping we are in the armes of an ever waking Father: Satan hath not power to touch us, sleeping or waking, without leave.

Secondly, Ged can make our sleepe an affliction. Jobs were ska­ring and terrifying dreames: Some dreames are for warning and admonition; The Lord warned Joseph in a dream: Some are for counsell and instruction, he revealed great things in dreames: [Page 639] Others are for comfort and consolation. Many a soul hath tasted more of heaven in a night-dreame, than in many daies attendance upon holy Ordinances. As the lusts of wicked men have dreames attending them, so also have the graces of the Saints. Jobs dreames were for terrour and afflictions. Observe secondly,

Satans desire of troubling poore souls, is restlesse. It is restlesse indeed, for he will not give them leave to rest, they shall not sleep in quiet, their very dreames shall be distractions, and their nightly representations, a vexation to them. Note further,

That (if God permit) Satan can make dreames very terrible to us. He can shew himselfe in a dreame, and offer ugly sights, extreamly perplexing to the Spirit. He is able to cast himself in­to a thousand ill favour'd shapes, into horrid and dreadfull shapes, he can cloath himself with what habit he pleases, if God give him a generall Commission. And hence the devill terrifies, not only by temptations to the mind, but by aparitions to the eye, and is seen, at least conceived to be seen (especially by such as labour un­der strong diseases) like a Lion, a Beare, a Dogge, gaping, grin­ning, staring: whence we say of any terrifying sight, it looks like a devill. We depend upon God, as for sleep, so for the comfort of sleep. Many lie downe to sleep and their sleep is their terrour. As that evill spirit (in the Gospel) went about seeking rest, but found none: So he hinders some, (and would more) from finding rest, when they seeke it. Therefore blesse God for any refreshing you have by sleepe: Blesse God when your dreames are not your skares, nor your beds your racke. See the effect, what deepe im­pressions, dreadfull dreams made in Jobs spirit, he was so affrigh­ted with them, that he professes with his next breath.

Verse 15. My soule chuseth strangling, and death rather then life, I loath it, I would not live alwayes.

So that my soul chooseth strangling.] He renews his former often repeated motion, but with a greater ardency; He not only prefers death before his troubled condition, but a violent death, and (in the opinion of some) the worst of violent deaths, strangling, which though it be not the most painfull of violent deaths, yet it is looked upon as the most ignominious of violent deaths.

Some referre these words to the terrour which Job had in his dreames and visions, as if they were so violent upon him, that they almost distracted him, and made him mad, that they even put [Page 640] him upon desperate thoughts of destroying himselfe: My soule chooseth strangling, that is, I am often tempted and almost pre­vailed Ab hujusmodi spectris multos sejam strangu­lasse, & profi­liisse in puteos asserit. Hippoc. with, to make my selfe away. The learned Physitians tell us, that their Patients have often attempted to destroy themselves tho­rough the terrours of dreams and visions.

Yet we may understand the word [strangling] only of naturall and ordinary. Every death is a kind of strangling; and some diseases stop and choke a man even as strangling doth; so that, My soule chooseth strangling, may be taken in generall, My soul chooseth death rather then life.

My soul chooseth.

He puts the soul (as it is often in Scripture) for the whole man; and the sence of all is, as if he had said, If I might be my own chooser, if I might have my election, I would even take the worst of deaths rather than the life which now I live. My soul chooseth strangling.

And death rather then life.

If we take strangling for a speciall death, then here death is put in generall; As thus, if strangling be too easie a death, let me die any kind of death, Death rather then life.

The Hebrew in the letter is, And death rather than my bones, which some render thus, And death rather than to be with my [...] Os a robore di­ctum, nihil in ip­so taem sorte & firmum quod vis doloris non debilitarat & confregerat. Aquin. bones; To be with our bones is to live. Others make this choo­sing an act of his bones, My soul chooseth strangling and my bones death: that is, every part of me chooseth death, all vote for the grave, I have not a dissenting member, no nor a dissenting bone; when David prayes, Psal. 6. 2. Heale me O Lord, for my bones are vexed; His meaning is, I am vexed quite through. And when he promiseth (Psal. 35. 10.) All my bones shall say, who is like unto the Lord, &c. his meaning is, that he will praise God quite thorough, soul and body. Againe (Lam. 1. 13.) From above hath he sent fire into my bones, and it prevaileth against me, that is, he hath utterly consumed me. So here the whole man is expres­sed by parts, soul and bones, or body and soul, that is, whether I consider the anguish of my soul, or the pains of my body, I desire to die.

Thirdly [Death rather then my bones;] because he had such sore putrified and afflicted bones, painfull bones: For when Satan [Page 641] desired a Commission to afflict him, he words it thus, Touch his flesh, and his bone, and he will curse thee to thy face: Doubtlesse Magis optarim mori, quam ta­lia essa & mem­bra pu [...]ida & ulceribus diffla­entia. Merc-Ossiūm mentinit quod dolor ad intima us (que) ossa penetravit. Satan had gone as deepe, as his commission; he had liberty to touch his flesh and his bone, and he did it: He vexed his very bones (as we say) my bones are ewen rotted and consumed, the sores and the putrifaction is sunke downe into my marrow, I had rather have death than my bones; that is, than a body thus consum­ed and putrified even to the very bones.

Yet further, some of the Hebrews give it thus; Death rather than my bones] because Job had nothing left him, but bones, he could not say my flesh, for his flesh was consumed: As we say, Jobo vix aliud quam ossasu­peresset. Such a man is nothing, but skin and bones, a very skelleton; I am nothing but bones, and I had rather die, than live such an A­natomie.

Verse 16. I loath it, I would not live alway; let me alone, for my dayes are vanity.

He closeth up his complaint, as he had often done before, with the tedium that was upon him, and the nauciousnesse of his life: I loath it, I am nothing but skin and bone, nothing but sores and boyles, my life is a burthen to mee, I would not live al­way.

I loath it.

The word signifies the greatest aversation possible. God expres­seth [...] his greatest displicency of that, wherein the Jewes were com­manded to take their greatest pleasure, under this notion, Amos 5. 21. I dispise your feasts; you thinke you keepe solemne feasts, wherein I delight as much as your selves, but I loath them, my stomack turnes at every dish. The stomack closes with wholsome meat, and turnes to it; that which is unwholesome, the stomack turnes against, the sight of it causes loathing. Their feasts were of Gods own appointment, and he used (in a sence) to feast with them, but their hypocrisie spoild the banquet. Job speaks of his own life, what the Lord spake of their feasts. I loath it, even as that meat which is most burthensome to the stomack. So Psal. 53. 5. Thou hast put them to shame, because God loathed them, or, be­cause God despised them: They who are loathsome to God cannot long be honourable or acceptable among men.

[Page 642] I would not live alway.

The word is, I would not live to eternity; or, I would not live [...] for ever. Why, who can, if he would? Why should Job depre­cate that, which was not attainable? I would not live alway, he needed not trouble himselfe about that; (for he speakes of a na­turall life) it being impossible that he should. There is no feare of living alwaies in this world, nor is there any hope of avoiding it in the next. Why then doth Job say, I would not live alway. To live alway or for ever, is often used in Scripture, for a long time; The Ceremonies and institutions of the Jewes were said to be for ever, because they were long-lived, yet we know they are vanish­ed and gone, That which continues as long as it should, continues al­wayes. So here, I would not live alway, that is, I would not live long or I would not live out my full time, I had rather be cut off in the midst of my daies, or in the midst of my yeares, than live to the end of them.

Let me alone, for my daies are vanity.

Let me alone.] Or cease from me; which is taken two wayes, either, leave off to prolong and protract my daies, cease from me so, doe not stand by me, with thine assisting power to keepe my life whole within me; I am ready to die, give me no strong-water or cordiall, rather pull away my pillow, let me goe: Or, Cease from me; that is, cease afflicting me, take off thine afflicting hand from me, doe not any longer hold me in this woefull and sad condition, [...] huic [...] Mundus, tempus hoc nomen non tam humanae vitae [...]erminum quam totum vi­tae cur [...]icul [...]m & tempus hu­manae vitae praefinitum de­notat quod cito deficit & ces­s [...]t. Cease from me. The world and time, while they continue are al­wayes ceasing, and therefore have their denomination from this word, which signifies co cease.

For my dayes are vanity.

That's the ground of his prayer, why he requests God to cease from him, My dayes are vanity; why shouldst thou stay me lon­ger in a vaine shadow. If we take, Cease from me, or, let me a­lone, for the ending of his affliction, it is, as if he had said, my life is vanity, there is trouble enough in it; if thou givest me the greatest ease, that ordinarily a life can have, yet it is but a vaine life, I need not have this super-addition or accumulation of sorrows upon me: Or, let me alone my life is vanity; why should I converse further and longer with vanity.

[Page 643] My daies are vanity.

He saith not, my dayes are vain, but they are vanity. My dayes [...] A verbo Habal, quod est eva­nescere. R [...] denotat quae non est quidpi [...]m, aut quae cito de­sinit, aut fl [...]us, qui exit ab ore, sic enim halitū infantium ap­pellant. Pag. are Hebel, which signifieth a vaine, light thing, a buble on the water, or a breath of the mouth, my dayes are but a breath, or a puffe. The root imports, vanishing or disappearing, the still al­most unperceiveable breath of a little infant, which will scarce move a feather. Alas, my dayes are fleeting and vanishing, vaine, yea vanity, they have no consistency in them, O then cease from me, and let me doe what vanity must, vanish out of sight. Hence observe,

First, That which a man loatheth, he longs to be rid of. I loath it, I would no live alway. When a man loaths his sin, then he saith, I would not sin alway. I would be eased of this burthen of corruption, O wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death. When a man delights in sinne, he would sinne alway, he thinkes he can never have enough of sinning: it is so in any other instance; where once affection is alienated, we would be estranged, and taken off from conversation: We care not to be with that from which our hearts are departed. Assoone as ever Amnon, had defiled, he loathes his sister, and assoone as he loa­thed her, he turned her out of doores, And Amnon said unto her, arise and be gone, 2 Sam. 13. 15. He that loathes his life, is glad when a doore opens for it's departure.

I loath it, I would not live alway. Secondly, observe,

Trouble makes a little time seeme long. He had said before, that his life was swifter then a Weavers shuttle; now, I would not live alway; O how long is my life, how tedious! He lookes upon it, as if it were a kind of eternity, as if his life would never have an end, never be done, I would not live alway. Paine makes every houre a day, and every day a moneth, and every moneth a yeare, yea an age. He thinks his life will never end, whose affli­ction doth not; he thinkes he shall never die, because his troubles live. Every man is ready to say, he lives too long, when he lives not, as he would. The soules under the Altar cried out (Revel. 6. 10.) How long Lord, how long Lord, wilt thou cease to avenge, &c. of our good dayes we complaine, How short Lord, how short? And of our evill daies we cry out, How long Lord, how long? This is a long day, and this a long night indeed, this is a long fit, this a lasting affliction. As the eternity which we shall have in hea­ven, [Page 644] is the longest, so it is the shortest; Eternity is longest in re­gard of duration, but it is shortest in regard of apprehension; The eternity of heaven shall be to us, no more tedious than a minut or a moment. Eternity is so full of pleasure and satisfaction, that it breeds no fullnesse of it selfe: living at the well head of comfort, in immediate communion with God by Jesus Christ, our comforts renew as much as they continue; whence freshnesse of appetite, and fullnesse of satisfaction, are perpetually interchangeable. The joyes of that estate are so many, that the yeares seeme but few. Eternall joy makes eternity, but as a moment, as eternall pain will make every moment an eternity.

Thirdly, Observe; forasmuch as Job saith, I would not live al­waies; he intimates, that there is such a desire in some men; for he speaks of a life in this world;

There is a principle in man, drawing out his heart in desires, to live alway in the world. I (saith Job) would not live alway; let others make that their choice, if they will, I will not. Most are very greedy of that commodity, and would not part with it upon any termes: and no wonder, for (as the Psalmist describes them) They have their portion in this life; He that hath his por­tion in this life, would ever have this life; he that hath nothing beyond this world, would never goe heyond the world. Such must needs be all for life, all for the world, because these are their all. You shall never come to a worldly man, and find him in a mind to die, Let orhers take heaven, he is contented with his earth; let others make their best of the next life, the present shall serve his turne.

From the reason of this request, My dayes are vanity, Ob­serve;

The life of man is a vain life. Vanity hath two things in it, whereof the one may seem quite contrary to the other; it hath emptinesse in it, and it hath fulnesse in it; it hath emptinesse of comfort, and fulnesse of vexation; that's the right vanity, Vani­ty with vexation of spirit; My daies are vanity, they are empty of good and full of evill.

Foure waies, the vanitie of mans dayes may be demonstra­ted.

First, they are vaine comparatively: So our daies are more then vaine, or lesse then vanity, for they are nothing, Psal. 39. 5. Mine age is nothing before thee. As in comparison of God [Page 645] (Isa. 40. 15. 17,) The Nations are as the drop of a bucket, &c. they are vanity, yea they are nothing, yea they are counted to him lesse then nothing; So our daies are vaine, they are nothing but vanity, they are lesse than vanity, or nothing; Nothingnesse is the substance of vanity, and all troublesomenesse is the accident of it. We cannot forme up an apprehension of our life, so little as it is, we cannot reach so low in our thoughts, as the bottome of mans vanity, in either notion. As we are not able to raise our hearts so high, as the excellency of that estate, which we have by Christ; no mans thoughts are bigg enough, or can be, to com­prehend or to take in that: So we cannot little our thoughts e­nough to consider the estate, sinne hath brought us into; therefore it is said, to be as nothing, and lesse than nothing, and how lit­tle that is, which is lesse then nothing, no man can propor­tion.

Secondly, our dayes are vanity, because they are so unconstant and changeable, so subject to motion and alteration. That's a vaine thing which is ever upon it's change. That which sets the glory of God highest in opposition to the vanity of the creature, is, That with him there is no variablenesse, nor shaddow of turning, Jam. 1. 17. or, shaddow by turning; some translate it so, no sha­dow by turning, because the Tropique or turning of the Sunne makes the shaddow: while the Sun is in the Zenith, that is, di­rectly over our heads in the highest point of the heavens, we cast no shadows. Now the Lord never turneth, he is ever fixed at a point, and so makes no shaddow; or thus, as we render it, no shaddow of turning; that is, not only is there no turning in God, but there is not so much as a shaddow of it, not so much as the least imagination of a shaddow. This sets up the glory of God highest: And in opposition to this point of highest perfection in God, lies the lowest point of the creature vanity: that in them there is no­thing but turning, in them there is nothing but variableness, and the substance of turning. The fashion of the world passeth away, it is ever passing, never standing at a stay. It is more then passing, it is posting from stage to stage, night and day. As the nature of Sicut bomo om­nes in scipso res velut mundus quidam, ita om­nium mutatio­num seminae con­tinct. man containes the seeds and principles of all things in the world (and is therefore called a little world.) So his nature contains the seeds and principles of all the changes in the world. Therefore his daies are vain.

Thirdly, the vanity of these daies appeares in this, because they [Page 646] are unsatisfying dayes. That's a vaine thing, which doth not sa­tisfie; for vanity is emptinesse, and emptinesse can never fill: our dayes are but as a dream. And what is spoken in Isaias (Chap. 29. 8.) concerning the dreamer, is verified of a meere naturall life, It is saith the Prophet, As when a hungry man dreameth, and be­hold he eateth; but he awaketh and his soule is empty; or, as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold, he drinketh; but he awaketh and behold he is faint; neither hunger nor thirst can be appeased by dreames, satisfaction comes not in at the doore of imagination. Our daies of themselves can give us no more satisfaction, no better a break-fast, then a dreame of meat and drinke doth to a hungry, or a thirsty man. All creatures are not able to fill one. There is a satisfaction which comes to us thorough the creature, but the creature doth not satisfie: God can make any thing satisfie, the least of his creatures shall fill the greatest. He can give us as much, as we expect from them, that is, looke what satisfaction a man would have from a creature, that God can give when he pleaseth: But the daies of man are vanity in this, because we cannot take this satisfaction our selves from the creature; neither is any creature able to give it us. When creatures have done their best, we are hungry and restlesse still, empty and unsatisfied still. There is no rest till we returne to God, or till God turne his face to us.

Fourthly, the vanity of our daies appears in this, that they are deceiveable daies; that's very vaine to us, which deceives us. And in this the great vanity of the creature consists: it promiseth much and performeth nothing. Great promises are made, and hopes are raised very high: Riches will tell us, what they will doe for us; and honours will tell us, what they will doe for us, and how happy they will make us; and the wine will tell us, O how that will re­fresh us, and the sweet and the fat will tell us, how they will fat­ten us. All these make golden promises, but leaden performances. They cannot make good what they promise, unlesse they can, with evill. As Satan said to Christ, when he had not so much as a shoe­la [...]chet to dispose of, All this will I give thee: So the creature joyning with our hearts, makes wonderfull promises of high con­tent, and then leaves us most discontented, This is vanity and vexation of mans spirit. If the creature were not so free to enter bond, and give us security, for the paiment of great good, it would not be so ill with us. If the creature would say directly to us, it is [Page 647] not in me, as Job brings in the creatures disclaiming wisedome (chap. 28.) The sea saith, it is not in me; and the earth saith, it is not in me; So if creatures would speak plainly, comfort is not in us, help is not in us, satisfaction is not in us, and so tell us how vaine they are, their vanity were lesse to us, though the same in it selfe. It is worse to be deceived of good, then to want it.

Surely (saith David of this life) every man walketh in a vaine shew, Psal. 39. 6. there is a shew of this, and that, and the other Qnasi nihil ha­beat humana vita verum & solid [...]m, sed ap­parens umbra­tile, imag na­rium, thing a promise of it, but it is a vain shew, it is but like a Pageant, which feeds the eye, and delights the fancie, or pleases the eare, but passeth away, and leaveth you as empty as before. In the fifth verse of that Psalme, the inventory of mans temporall estate is summed up, and the totall amounts but to this, Every man at his best e­state is altogether vanity; and least any should think he hath mis­counted, an affirmation is prefixt; Surely, every man at his best estate is altogether vanity; Every man is vanity, and every man is vanity at his best estate: not only in his afflictions and in his losses, in his troubles and in his sorrows, such as Job now was in; but take a man in the height, and perfection, and accomplishment of all creature comforts and accrewments: take the cream, the pith, the marrow, the sweetnesse of all; extract a quintessence of all that can be had in creatures, all is vanity, Man at his best estate is vanity, yea altogether vanity.

When Cain was born, there was much adoe about his birth, I have got a man-child from God, saith his mother, she looked upon him as a great possession, and therefore called his name Cain, which signifies a possession; But the second man, that was born in­to the world, bare the title of the world vanity; his name was Abel, which is the word here used; They called his name Abel, that is, vanity: a premonition was given in the name of the second Abel viven­tium [...]m [...]ium typus & repre­sentatio, Pined. man, what would or should be the condition of all men. Psal. 144. 4. there is an allusion unto those two names; we translate it, Man is like to vanity, the Hebrew is, Adam is as Abel; Adam (you know) was the name of the first man, the name of Abels father; but as Adam was the proper name of the first, so it is an appellative, or common to all men; now Adam, that is man, or all men, are Abel, vaine, and walking in a vaine shadow.

And this word is by some translated, nothing, his dayes are no­thing, Temtus [...], Pined. Idols are nothing; time is but the Idol of eternity, and things temporall, but the Idol of things eternall. This word sig­nifies [Page 648] in the Hebrew, an Idol and a vaine thing: Deut. 32. 31. Jer. 2. 5. the word Abel, is translated Idol; and the Apostle (1 Cor. 8.) tells us, that an Idol is nothing in the world, that is, an Idol is the vainest thing in the world, or the greatest vanity: So that up­on the matter, our estate and our dayes here are but an Idol, that is, the representation of a thing which is not; so much vanity and folly, so much trouble and sorrow, so much affliction is mixed with the dayes and life we now leade, as A nothing is all it can justly be called, or an Idol, a shew, of what is not.

And therefore we may well make it an argument (as Job here) to take us off from the world, and to chide worldlings with, as David did (Psal. 4.) O ye sons of men, how long will yee love vani­ty! or as Solomon about that adored Idol of the world, riches, (Prov. 23. 5.) wilt thou set thine eyes (or as the Originall) wilt [...] thou cause thine eyes to fly upon that, which is not. An Eagle will not catch flies (that's no game for her) much lesse will she make a flight at nothing, when there is no game sprung at all. And wilt thou make a flight with thy heart (for the eye which Solomon chiefely intends, is the eye of the soul) when nothing springs before thee, but, that which is not.

To close this point, if the creature be so vaine, and the dayes of man be vanity, let us set our eyes and hearts upon that which is, something, upon that which is all, upon that which is lasting, upon that which is everlasting, upon that which is true, upon that which is truth, upon that which will not deceive, upon that which cannot deceive, upon that which will be more in fruition, then ever it was in expectation.

The excellency of that estate we have in spirituals, consists in this, that as it promiseth much, so it performeth much, and rather more than it promiseth; a beleever finds himselfe satisfied in Christ, beyound expectation; the soul did not expect so much as it finds: As the Queen of Sheba comming to Solomon, had satis­faction beyound report and promise, so shall all who come to Christ; he makes us large promises, and if we beleeve, we shall find larger performances: We shall, at last, say, that the halfe of those good things which we now enjoy, were not told us in the promises: God hath layed up all good in his word, but our thoughts are not able to take out the extent of those good things; Hence it is said, that when Christ appeares, He shall come to be admired in his Saints; things shall be so far beyound their apprehension, that they shall be all in admiration.

JOB Chap. 7. Vers. 17, 18. 19.

What is man, that thou shouldest magnifie him? and that thou shoul­dest set thine heart upon him?

And that thou shouldest visit him every morning: and try him every moment?

How long wilt thou not depart from me, nor let me alone, till I may swallow down my spittle?

THese three verses, containe a farther argument, whereby Job strengthens his complaint. The summe of the argument is taken, from a comparison of the power, majesty and greatnesse of God, with the meannesse and misery, with the lownesse and po­verty of man; What is man, that thou shouldest magnifie him, and that thou shouldest set thine heart upon him? Why should the great, the wise, the powerfull, the glorious God, contend or have to do with weak, miserable, vaine man. How unequall is this Paria paribus congandent. match?

What is man?] The word is, what is miserable man? Enosh, man encompast about with sorrowes. What is this sorrowfull miserable [...] man? Job concluded in the former verse, man is vanity. And yet here he questions, What is man?

The question rellisheth of contempt, rather then of ignorace: and carries with it a low estimation of man, let him be what he will, not a want of information what man is: What is man? As we use to say to, or of those we slight, who are you? or what's he? It imports the vanity and deficiency of the creature. Or the words are a diminitive admiration: He admires the smallnesse, the littlenesse, the meannesse, the nothingnesse of man. Questions in Scripture, often abate the sence, Zech. 4. 7. Who art thou O great mountaine? thou lookest very big and very great, but who art thou? tell me who thou art, or I will tell thee, thou art now but a molehill, thou shalt be a nothing shortly, Before Zerubba­bel thou shalt become a plaine: it is a contemptuous underva­luing question against the proud opposers of the Church. Who am I, O Lord, and what is my house (saith David, 2 Sam. 7. 18.) His question extenuates. On the other side; questions often in­crease the sence, and raise it to the highest. Exod. 15. 11. Who is a God like unto thee? where is there such a God as thou art? So [Page 650] Mich. 7. 18. Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity, transgressi­on and sinne? The question puts the brightest glory upon God, in pardoning sin. Hence man is abased in a question, what is man? how low, how poore a creature is he?

Or take the question, barely for a desire of resolution; as if this were a peece of a Catechisme about mans frailty, what is man? He had told us in the words immediatly forgoing the text; that man is vanity, why then doth he enquire in these words, what is man? It is not to learne what man is, but to teach us the wonder, that man being such, should be thus regarded: As if he had said, Forasmuch as man is vanity, what is vanity that thou shouldest mag­nifie it? will any one esteeme vanity, and prize a thing of nought? man is vanity; that's the answer to the question.

The Scripture gives many answers to this question: Aske the Prophet Isaiah, what is man? and he answers (chap. 40. 6.) Man is grasse, All flesh is grasse, and the goodlinesse thereof as the flower of the field. Aske David, what is man? He answers (Psal. 62. 9.) Man is a lye, not a lyar only, or a deceiver, but a lye and a deceit. All the answers the holy Ghost gives concerning man, are to humble man: Man is ready to flatter himselfe, and one man to flatter another; but, God tels us plainly, what we are.

That thou shouldest magnifie him? or make him great? [...] There is a three-fold sense of that word [magnifie] used in Scrip­ture. Magnus quan­titate vel qua­litate, annis bo­nore existima­tione, authori­tate, Shind.

1. It implies, only a manifestation or declaration of anothers greatnesse, or an opening of his intrinsicall worth and dignity; in which sence, man is often said to magnifie God, he declares and publishes the infinite, internall worth and dignity of God. Luke. 1. 46. the Virgin beginneth her Song thus, My soule doth magnifie the Lord. It is impossible we should give the least addition to the greatnesse of God: Then magnifying of God, is only a declaring that God is great: So, Psal. 34. 3. O magnifie the Lord with me, that is, let us joyne our hearts and our tongues in this great work, to lift up the honour and Name of our God.

2. To magnifie, is to esteeme or prize greatly: So the Apostle speaking of his office, shewes how highly he priz'd it, by breaking forth into this holy boast, Rom. 11. 13. I magnifie mine Office. I esteeme this as my greatest priviledge and honour, that God hath called me to be an Apostle; And Acts 5. 19. when the Pharisees were so angry with the Apostles, and many were afraid to joyne [Page 651] with them, the text saith, the people magnified them, that is, the peo­ple had high thoughts of them, and esteemed them greatly.

But thirdly (which is chiefely intended in this place) to mag­nifie, is, to make great, or to give some reall addition of worth and respect. Thus the Lord magnifies man; he magnifies him, by ad­ding somewhat to him, by giving glory and lustre to man, who in himselfe is vile, and mean, and contemptible. And thus God magni­fies man foure wayes.

First, He magnifies man in the work of creation; of that we reade, Psal. 8. 4. where this question is put, What is man that thou shouldest be mindfull of him, or the sonne of man that thou visitest him; The third verse shewes us, what it was which raised the Psalmist to this admiration of the goodnesse of God to man; When I behold the heavens, the work of thy fingers, the Moone and the Starres which thou hast made; Lord what is man? God in the work of creation, made all these things serviceable and in­strumentall for the good of man. What is man, that he should have a Sun, a Moon and Stars planted in the firmament for him? what creature is this? when great preparations are made in any place, much provisions layed in, and the house adorned with ri­chest furnitures; We say, what is this man that comes to such a house? when such a goodly fabrique was raised up, the goodly house of the world adorned and furnished, we have reason, admi­ring to say; what is this man that must be the tenant, or inhabi­tant of this house? There is yet a higher exaltation of man in the creation, man was magnified with the stampe of Gods image; one part whereof the Psalmist describes at the fift verse; Thou hast given him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; Thou hast put all things under his feet, all sheepe and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field, the fowle of the aire, and the fish of the sea, &c. Thus man was magnified in creation. What was man that he should have the rule of the world given him? that he should be the Lord over the fish of the sea, & over the beasts of the field, and over the foules of the ayr. Again, man was magnified in creation, in that God set him in the next degree to the Angels; Thou hast made him a little lower than the Angels; there is the first part of the answer to this question, man was magnified in being made so excellent a creature, and in having so many excel­lent creatures made for him. All which may be understood of man, as created in Gods image, and Lord of the world, but since [Page 652] the transgression, it is peculiar to Christ, As the Apostle applies it, (Heb. 2. 6.) and to those who have their bloud and dignity resto­red by the work of redemption, which is the next part of mans exaltation.

Secondly, Man is magnified or made great by the work of re­demption. That exalts man indeed. Man was laid low, and his honour in the dust, notwithstanding all that greatnesse which he received in creation: Though Sun, and Moone, and Stars, the fish of the Sea, and the fowles of the ayre, &c. were made his servants, and himselfe a companion of Angels; yet by sin he fell below all these priviledges, and was made a companion for Devils, a citizen of hell: Therefore the second magnifying of man, was by the work of redemption. And, what was man that thou shouldest redeeme him, when he was a captive? raise him when he was downe, build and repaire him when he was ruin'd, when he was lost seeke him, and when he was bankrupt and undone, give him a better stock and set him up againe? What was man that thou shouldest doe all this for him? How did the mercy of God magnifie his ser­vants, when he gave his Son to pay their debt to his own justice? If man was magnified when the Sun, and Moone, and heavens were made for him; how was he magnifyed, when God was made man for him? how was he exalted, when the Son of God was humbled for him!

Thirdly, Man is magnified or made great in the work of rege­neration, wherein God re-stamps his Image upon him, in those shining characters of holinesse and knowledge; The first creation being spoiled, occasion'd redemption, and redemption purchased a second creation. Every one that is in Christ is a new creature, 2 Cor. 5. 17. Our dignity is far greater in being new creatures, then in being creatures.

Lastly, Man is magnified by those severall acts of favour and grace, which God casts upon him every day: smiling upon him, embracing him in his armes, admitting him to neere communion with himselfe, watching over him, tending him, guarding him with Angels, directing him, counselling him, comforting him, up­holding him by his spirit, till he bring him unto glory, which is the highest step of preferment that mans nature is capable of. What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him in all these things? Ob­serve hence; first, That,

All the worth and dignity of man, is out of himselfe. What [Page 653] is man? As if he had said, man hath nothing of his own, to com­mend him to, or to ingratiate himself with God. God hath put something upon him, he hath magnified man, and given him a reall worth, because he would. Free grace exalts man. Hence (Psal. 90. 20.) the Psalmist prayes, Let the heathen know them­selves to be but men: As if he had said, man, who is high in his own esteeme, conceits himselfe to be somewhat above man, he judges of himselfe beyound his own sphere and border: Therefore Lord bring their thoughts within the compasse of their own con­dition, let them know that they are but men; A man that is ac­quainted with himselfe, will be humble enough; A meere man, is but meere earth. The Prophet tells him so, thrice over, with one breath (Jer. 22. 29.) O earth, earth, earth, heare the word of the Lord. Man is earth, in the constitution of his body, that was framed out of the earth: he is earthly in the corruption of his mind, that muds in the earth: The Apostles stile is, earthly minded men: And he will be earth, in his dissolution; when he dies he returnes to his earth. A naturall man is earth all over; earth in his making, earthly in his mind, his spirit earthly, earth gets into this hea­ven, his upper regions: and the body, his lower region, shall moul­der to earth againe: Then, what is man? Hence (I say) it is, that when man at any time would exalt and lift himself up, he thinks himselfe above man, he hath some notion or apprehension of an excellency, beyound the line of a creature: He conceits he hath or is a peece of a deity. The first ground of hope upon which man raised himselfe against God, was, that he might be a god; he was not sa­tisfied in being made like unto God, he would be (which was the highest robbery) Gods equall, and stand by himselfe: this thought was his fall. There is such a principle of pride in the hearts of all men by nature. They are not contented in the spheare of a creature, they would be somewhat, beyound that. The truth is, all the true worth and dignity of man, is in what he hath beyound himselfe, his excellency is in Christ, and his glory, in being made partaker of the divine nature. It abased man, when he aspired to take a divine na­ture to himselfe, but it exalts man, when God inspires him with a participation of the divine nature. What is man that thou doest thus magnifie him? Christ makes us very great and glorious, by the dignity which he puts upon us: as he tells the Church (Ezek. 16. 14.) Thy beauty was perfect, through my comelinesse which I had put upon thee; thou hadst no comelinesse, no beauty of thine own, [Page 654] but thorough my comelinesse thou art very beautifull. The worth of man is out of himselfe; the Church shines by those rayes, by that lustre, which Christ casts upon her.

Secondly observe from this question, What is man, &c.

Man hath layed himselfe so low, that he is not worthy of one thought from God. What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him and set thy heart upon him? It is a wonder that God should vouchsafe a gracious looke upon such a creature as man; it is won­derfull, considering the distance between God and man, as man is a creature, and God the creatour; What is man: that God should take notice of him? is he not a clod of earth, a peece of clay? but consider him as a sinfull and an uncleane creature, and we may wonder to amazement; what is an uncleane creature, that God should magnifie him? will the Lord indeed put value upon filthines, and fix his approving eye upon an impure thing? One step further, what is rebellious man, man an enemy to God, that God should magnifie him! what admiration can answer this question? will God prefer his enemies, and magnifie those who would cast him downe? Will a Prince exalt a traytor, or give him honour, who attempts to take away his life? The sinfull nature of man, is an enemy to the nature of God, and would pull God out of Heaven; yet God even at that time, is raising man to Heaven; Sinne would lessen the great God, and yet God greatens sinfull man. Thirdly observe;

Though man be low in himselfe, yet God bestows many thoughts and cares upon him. Though there be no reason at all in man, why God should magnifie him, yet God doth and will. Free grace overlooks all the distance that is between God and us, as we are creatures, and it overlooks that greater and vaster distance, which is between God and us, as we are sinfull creatures; Many a man is ready to think himselfe so good and so great, that his bro­ther is not worthy one of his thoughts, or a cast of his eye; he thinks it too much to looke towards a man, that is of the same make with himselfe, because he is a little lower statur'd in estate or degree. A great rich man thinks he doth a poore man a very great favour, if he turns about and speaks to him: We may well cry out with admiration, O the pride of man to man! and O the love of God to man! one man hath scarce humility enough to speake to a­nother, who in nature is equall to him, and yet God (who is infinite­ly above us) hath love enough to magnifie and set his heart upon him.

The language of the holy Ghost, is very graduall about this point.

Eirst, What is man that thou art mindfull of him? and the sonne of man, that thou visitest him? Psal. 8. 4. To be mindfull of a man, is not so much as to visit him, we may be mindfull of those, whom we goe not to see, or to whom we send no helpe.

Secondly, What is man that thou takest knowledge of him, or the sonne of man, that thou makest an account of him, Psal. 144. 3. It is much that God will take knowledge of a man, or cast an eye upon him, but it is a great deale more, that God will make account of him; but the third and highest step of favour, is this of the text, that the Lord will magnifie man and set his heart upon him, as if he could not be without him? Observe, Fourth­ly,

The true apprehension of the greatnesse of Gods mercy and good­nesse to us, makes us little in our owne eyes. I ground it thus, when Job had considered how the Lord exalts and greatens man, he then abases and diminishes man, what is man that thou shoul­dest magnifie him? Nothing should draw man so low in himself, as to thinke how high God doth, and how much higher, yet, God intends to raise him. In the 1 Chron. 17. 16. When David en­quired of God by Nathan, whether he should build him an house? God answered no, he should not, but his sonne after him should; But though the Lord would not have David build him an house, yet the Messenger, who was to carry this report, must tell David, That the Lord would build him an house, and establish his sonne upon the throne after him, vers. 10. 11. Assoon as David had this answer brought him, of Gods wonderfull goodnesse toward him, and of those large promises to his family, he breaks out into this di­minutive admiration, Who am I, O Lord God, and what is mine house, that thou hast brought me hitherto? And yet this is a small thing in thine eyes, O God: for thou hast also spoke of thy servants house for a great while to come, and hast regarded me according to the estate of a man of high degree, O Lord God. We hear not of such an humble speech falling from Davids lips, till Gon sent him that message of advancement. And so (2 Sam. 9. 8.) when David out of that aboundant love he bare to Jonathan, enquired, Is there any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him kindnesse for Jonathans sake? Mephibosheth was found; And when David told him, I will take care for thee, Thou shalt [Page 656] eat bread at my table continually; This favour astonisheth Me­phibosheth, what is thy sevant, that thou shouldest looke upon such a dead dogg, as I am? He spake of himselfe below men, when he heard David speake so highly of him. A living dogg is better then a dead Lion; but what is worse then a dead dogg? The like impression Davids excessive kindnesse made upon the spirit of Abigail (1 Sam. 25. 41.) when he sent messengers to her, after the death of her husband Nabal, to assure her, that he would be her husband. This honour (that David annointed King over Is­rael should desire her to be his wife) abases Abigail in her own eyes, Let me (saith she) be a servant to wash the feet of the ser­vants of my Lord. Davids wife! (said she) it is too much pre­ferment for me, to be Davids servant! I shall be honour'd e­nough to be his servants servant, and that in the lowest service, to wash their feet. As ingenuous spirits, when they heare messages of great favours tender'd them, fall low in their own thoughts: So much more will gracious spirits. Those magnifying offers of Christ and pardon of sin by him, of a crowne of life, and an ex­ceeding weight of glory purchas'd by him; these magnifying pro­mises (I say) bring the soule upon the knee, upon the meditation and acknowledgement of it's owne meannesse and vilenesse; What am I that the Lord should respect me, that the Lord should re­deeme me, that he should regenerate me, than he should set his love upon me, prepare heaven and glory, a crowne and a kingdome for me? what am I? There is nothing doth more emptie us of self-conceit and high thoughts, than duly to consider, what high thoughts God hath of us.

Note one thing further from these words, what is man that thou shouldest magnifie him?

If God magnifie man, one man should not vilifie and debase a­nother; one man should not contemne and slight another. Who art thou that centemnest thy brother? Thou canst not (really) magnifie thy brother, and wilt thou debase him? It is a most dangerous at­tempt to abase those, whom God magnifies, to despise those whom God honours. That, on whom God sets his heart, against him, man should set his heart, or tongue, or pen. God seekes occasion to magnifie us, though we give him advantages every day to cast dis­honour upon us. Let man takc heed how he dishonours those, whom the great God now doth, and intends to honour more. When Pharoah magnified Joseph, he caused the people to cry A­brech, [Page 657] that is, bow the knee before him, Gen. 41. 43. And when Ahasuerus intended to advance Mordecai. He commanded him to be arrayed in royall aparrell, &c. and proclamation to be made, Thus shall it be done to the man, whom the King delighteth to honour, Esth. 6. 11. Princes expect that al should favour and honour, those, whom they honour and make their favourites. Surely then the great God will not beare it, that they should be despised, whom he delights in, and casts honour upon.

But here a Question arises, How this is appliable unto Job? why doth Job, who lay upon a dung-hill, and was cast into so low a condition, speake of magnifying? Was Job magnified? Doth Job wonder at his preferment and exaltation, when he was brought downe to the dust? Poore Job! Thou wast almost nulli­fied, and made no body, and dost thou speake, as if thy honour were too big for thee, What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him? We may answer.

First, By connecting this word [magnifie] with the words that follow; What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him, and that thou shouldest set thine heart upon him? As if he had said, What is man that thou shouldest magnifie him, by setting thine heart upon him? And so, setting the heart upon man, is an expli­cation of what is meant by magnifying man. And that's a cleare truth; when God sets his heart upon a man, he magnifies him sure enough; that act of God is the exaltation of the creature: Man needs no greater honour then this, that God sets his heart upon him; he that knows that, knows himself high enough. Whatsoever man sets his heart upon, he (as man can) exalts and magnifies it. If a man sets his heart upon another man, he magnifies that man. Yea, if a man sets his heart upon a beast or a stoue, (he in a sence) dei­fies that beast, that stone. If he sets his heart upon any creature, he makes that creature a god to him: for nothing should have the heart, but God alone. And the reason is, because setting the heart upon any thing is the highest exaltation we can give it. Therefore nothing ought to have the heart set upon it, but God; for he is Lord over all. And the Lord cals us to set our hearts upon him, be­cause that is the highest honour, creatures can give him. Now, as our setting our hearts on God magnifies him, so the setting of his heart on us, doth wonderfully magnifie us. And he therefore sets his heart upon us, that we might at once see and admire, how much he honours us. If a King set his heart upon a man, that man [Page 658] is greatly magnified; he is magnified in the opinion of others; and not only in the bare opinion of others, but there is a real dignity put up­on that man, on whom a King puts his heart. How much more, if God sets his heart upon man, is man really magnified. That God sets his eye upon a man, is a magnifying of him. It was the privi­ledge of Solomons Temple, that the Lord promised his eye would be upon that place; and it was a high honour to the Temple, that God would looke upon it continually, 1 King. 8. 29. If it be a condescension for God to eye the creature, He humbleth himselfe to behold the things that are in heaven and in the earth, Psa. 113. 6. How great is his condescention in setting his heart upon the crea­ture. So there is a truth in this sence, and we may make a com­fortable improvement of it, What is man that thou shouldest mag­nifie him, by setting thine heart upon him?

Secondly, Job may have respect to his former greatnesse, when God magnified him, and made him the greatest man in the East; and is now be-moaning his owne change, in the changeablenesse of mans condition; who, when he is lifted up to the highest, fairly built and adorned, yet in a moment may be cast downe and Quorsum in me lo [...]pletando tuam operam p [...]suisti, tuam providentiam ostendisti, qua­re me ad cum statum evexisti in qua parsiste­re non poteram. ruin'd. Therefore Job comes with his wonder, Lord, what is man! What is the ordinary state of man, that thou shouldest take care to make him great! As if he had said, why didst thou magnifie me, to make me the greatest man in the East? Why didst thou set thine heart upon me, to blesse my family, and provide for me, as if thou hadst none else to provide for? Thou seest mans beauty is blasted in the twinckling of an eye, and then all thy worke is lost. It is not worth the while to doe that, which may be undone so soone. Would any one be at cost to build a house, to bestow a great deale of charge & pains upon it, and it may be spend some yeares about the adorning and furnishing of it; and when all's done, it is such a house, that the next breath of wind may le­vell with the ground. What is such a house, that a man should build it? When man is raised up and built, a puffe of wind, a blast of affliction blowes him downe, and brings him to the dust; what is this man, that he should be magnified? This is a good sence of the words; that Job reflecting upon his former greatnesse, and honour, now defaced and overthrowne, breakes out into this ex­postulation; what is man? Why should God in his providence lay out so much to magnifie and set a man up; who may be so quick­ly down, as you see I am at this day.

But thirdly, rather take it thus. What is man that thou shoul­dest magnifie him? Namely, by dealing with him thus in chast­nings and afflictions by disciplining and tutoring him with the rods of thy correction.

But you will say, Is it a magnifying of a man to afflict a man?

Yes, it is a magnifying of man; man is magnified two wayes, by affliction.

First, in that, God, who is so great will discend to chastise and correct, or to order the Chastisements and corrections of man. Man is magnified, when God deales or contends with him. That, Indignus sum, quem vel percu­tias, contemp­tior sum quam ut adversus me manum exten­das. God wrastles and strives with man, is an honour to man. David (1 Sam. 24. 14.) seemes to looke upon it, as too great honour (though it were a burdensome one) that Saul, a King, one so much above him, would follow and pursue him, Against whom is the King of Israel come out? against a dead dog, or against a flea? Alas, I am no match for thee, thou puttest too much weight up­on me, in that thou contendest with me. To make great preparati­ons, and to send out a great army and skifull Commanders against an enemie, magnifies that enemy, that is, it begets an apinion, that surely he is some great and potent enemy, against whom such great preparations are made. In this sense you may understand it, that affliction is a magnifying of a man, because the great God comes forth to battle against him, who is but dust and ashes, but as a dead dogg, or a flea. The Heathens had such a notion, they loo­ked Hoctamen in­foelix miseram solabere: morte. Aenei magni d [...]xtra cadis, Virg l. 10. Occumbens, I, nunc Herculis armis. Donum ingens semperae tuis memorabile fa­ctis. Valer. Flac. l. 3. Argon upon it, as no small priviledge for a man to be slaine by some famous great Commander; Comfort thy selfe in this miserable death (said one) thou fallest by the hand of great Aeneas, thou art magnifyed enough in this, that thou hast such a man as Aeneas to fight with thee. And another, To die by the arme of Hercules, amighty favour, and alwaies to be remembred. Some kind of trouble is an honour, as well as a trouble: The magnifying of man, as well as an afflicting of him. Man is so farre from deserving any favour from God, that, as a creature, he is not worthy a blow, though, as a sin­ner, he is most worthy of death from God.

But secondly, we may answer it, that man is (not only thus notionally, but) really magnified by afflictions, and that two waies.

First, in this life; the very humblings of the Saints are their exaltations: their afflictions are their glory. There was never any so [Page 660] famous for greatnesse, for riches, for honours, as some have been for sufferings. Who is there upon record throughout the whole booke of God? who is there in any historie of the world so fa­mous for greatnesse and riches and high atchievements, as Job a sufferer? All the victories of Alexander or Caesar, yea of Joshua and David, have not render'd them so famous to posterity, as the conflicts of Job. His affiictions have magnified him more, then all his other greatnesse, or then the greatnesse of other men hath mag­nified them. If Job had only been the richest man in the East, I be­lieve, we should never have had a word of any of his acts, or so much as mention of his name in Scripture. That which gave him the ho­nour to have a whole booke written of him alone by the pen of the holy Ghost, besides the often mention of his precious name in other books, is this, that he endured so much. That man is magnified really, who is thus afflicted, and comes off holily.

Secondly, Afflictions have an influence upon the life to come. The Apostle is expresse in that, 2 Cor. 4. 17. where he exhorts, not to be troubled with our present afflictions, for they worke for us a farre more exceeding weight of glory. That which workes for us an exceeding weight of glory, magnifies us. It is not said any where in the Scripture, that mans honours, or his riches, or his greatnesse in the world, worke for him a farre more exceeding weight of glory: There is no such thing ascribed or atributed to outward comforts and priviledges; but our afflictions worke for us a farre more exceeding weight of glory. Not (as Papists abuse that Scripture) as if afflictions did merit glory: but as the way Duntaxat sig­nificatur, quo itinare ad glo­riam perveni­tur. and course wherein God sets men, and through which he will ex­alt and lift them up to greatest glory. Glory is the purchase of Christ, and all the heaviest sufferings of the creature are not able to purchase one graine of glory, not the least imaginable weight of glory, much lesse an exceeding weight of glory; but God brings his people to glory, and makes them (as he did the Lord Christ) in their degree, perfect through sufferings. Hence observe;

That afflictions are (if rightly improved) the exaltations and magnifyings of the Saints. The rod of discipline in Gods hand, becomes a scepter of honour in ours. This crosses the com­mon thoughts of the world. The truth is, there is scarce a soule in the world under affliction, but he thinks himself abased by it, and saith, that God hath laid him low. Yet the right use and improve­ment of affliction, is the best preferment. The Apostle, Jam. 1. [Page 661] is expresse, Let the brother of low degree rejoyce in that he is exalted. The low have an exaltation; yea their lownesse is their exaltati­on: yet, we are ready to have undervaluing thoughts of our selves, when the hand of God is upon us; when God takes away that, for which men set a price upon themselves; they scarce thinke themselves worth any thing. But this especially reaches that sin­full contempt of others, a man afflicted is esteemed by most as a man abased. They who have prized a man, and had great thoughts of him, when he had a great estate, &c. let him once fall in tem­porals, though he continue the same in spirituals, yea, though he increases in them, and his grace shines, as much or more, then e­ver, yet he is dis-esteemed and laid low in their thoughts. So much for those words, what it is to magnifie; and likewise how they may have a sutablenesse with Jobs condition, he being so afflicted and emptied, when he spake them.

And that thou shouldest set thine heart upon him.

To set the heart notes foure things in Scripture.

First, Great care and intention of spirit, Prov. 27. 23. Be thou diligent to know the state of thy flocks, and looke well to thy herds; the Hebrew is, set thine heart upon thy herds: The heart is set upon the herds in providing and taking care of them, in looking to the welfare of the herds and of the flocks. Samuel uses that language to Saul (1 Sam. 9. 20.) when he came seeking his fa­thers asses, As for the asses (saith he) set not thine heart upon them. that is, take no care for them, never trouble thy selfe more about that businesse, that care is over, they are found. In this sence God sets his heart upon man; What is man that thou shoul­dest set thine heart upon him? That is, that thou shouldest take so much care of him, and watch over him; As the Lord speakes of his vineyard (Isa. 27. 3.) I the Lord will keepe it, lest any hurt it, I will keepe it night and day; He set his heart upon the vineyard to watch it, least any should, touching, hurt it. God in this sence takes so much care for man, that he seemeth (as it were) care­lesse of all other creatures, 1 Cor. 9. 9. Doth God take care for Oxen? God doth care for Oxen: The Apostle having shew­ed the goodnesse of God to beasts, providing by a law, that they should not be muzled, presently he questions, Doth God take care for Oxen? As if he had said, surely there is some what more in it, or, saith he it altogether for our sakes; Not altogether, doubtlesse [Page 662] God had regard to Oxen, But for our sakes no doubt it was writ­ten, that is, chiefly for our sakes, That he which ploweth, should plow in hope, and he that thresheth in hope, should be partaker of his hope, So, when Christ speaks of the Lillies, Mat. 6. If God so cloath the Lillies of the field, how much more will he cloath you? You shall have the strength of his care to provide for you, to feed and cloath you. thus God sets his heart upon man, he lookes to his people, as to his houshold, to his charge; he will see, they shall have all things needfull for them. And so not laying to heart, (which is the contrary) signifies carelesnesse, Isa. 47. 7. It is re­ported of Babylon, Thou saidst I shall be a Ladie for ever, so that thou didst not lay these things to thy heart; that is, thou didst not regard these things, to take care about them. And Ezek. 40. 4. the expression is very full, where God cals the Prophet to attention, and he calleth him all over, Behold (saith he) with thine eyes, and heare with thine eares, and set thine heart on all that I shall shew thee: He wakens the whole man; See, and see with thine eyes; Heare, and heare with thine eares, and set thine heart upon it, the sum of all is, be thou very intentive, and diligent about this businesse to the utmost.

Secondly, To set the heart notes an act of the affections and de­sires, A man sets his love upon what he sets his heart; that's the meaning of Psalm. 62. 10. If riches increase; set not your heart upon them; That is, let not your love, your affections, your desires close with these things: when riches abound, let not your desires abound too. It is an admirable frame of heart to have nar­row, scant affections in a large plentifull estate, He is the true rich man, who loves his riches poorly. Set your affections on things that are above, Col. 3. 2.

Thirdly, To set the heart, notes high esteeme and account, this is more than bare love and affection, 2 Sam. 18. 3. when a coun­sell of warre was held by Davids Commanders, about going out to battell against Absolom, they all vote against Davids person all undertaking, upon this ground, they will not care for us, they will not set their hearts upon us, or value us, their hearts are set upon thee, thou art the prize they looke for, and therefore the heate of the battell will be against thee. Againe, 1 Sam. 4. 20. When the wife of Phineas was delivered of a son (a son is the womans joy and glory, yet) the text saith, when the women that stood by, told her that a son was borne, she answered not, neither did she re­gard [Page 663] it, she did not set her heart upon it, because the glory was de­parted from Israel.

In either of these sences, the Lord sets his heart upon man, he greatly loves man; The love of God to man, is the spring of mercy to man, yea love is the spring of love, love acted, springs from a decree of love (Deut. 7. 7.) The Lord thy God did not set his love upon you, &c. because ye were more in number then any other people, but because the Lord loved you, Love also led in that highest work of mercy, the giving of Christ: God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten son. Josh. 3. 16. As love is the spring and root of all the reall duty, which mans performes to God, and is therefore called the fulfilling of the law; Our love fulfilleth the will of God: so the love of God is the root of all that good we receive, his love fulfilleth our will, that is, whatsoever we will or ask according to the will of God, the love of God fulfills it for us. Our love fulfills the law of Gods command, and Gods love fulfills the law of our wants and lawfull desires. His heart is set upon us, and then his hand is open to us.

Further, God doth not only love man, but his love is great, and his esteeme of man very high; and he reallizes the greatest love, by bestowing the greatest mercy: How did God set his heart upon us, when he gave his Son, who lay in his bosome, for us, He set his bosome upon us, when he gave us his Sonne, who came out of his bosome.

Hence let us see our duty. Should not we set our heart upon God, when God sets his heart upon us? the soveraignty of God, cals for our hearts: He, as Lord may use al that we have, or are: And there is more than a law of soveraignty, why, we should give God our hearts; God hath given us his heart first: he who calleth for our hearts, hath first given us his. What are our hearts to his heart? The love of God infinitely exceeds the love and affection of the creature. What were it to God, if he had none of our hearts? But woe to us, if we had not the heart of God. This phrase shews us the reason why God calls for our hearts, he gves us his own; it is but equall among men, to love where we are loved, to give a heart where we have received one; how much more should we love God, and give him our hearts, when we heare he loves us and sets his heart upon us, whose love & heart alone, is infinitely better then all the loves and hearts of all men and Angels.

There is yet a fourth consideration about this expression, the [Page 664] setting of the heart. Setting the heart, is applied to the anger and displeasure of God; so the phrase is used (Job 34. 14.) If he set his heart upon man, all flesh shall perish together: that is, if God be resolved to chastise man, to bring judgements upon him, all flesh shall perish together; none shall be able to oppose it. As it is the hightest favour to have God set his heart upon us in mercy and love, so it is the highest judgement, to have God set his heart upon a man in anger and in wrath, to set his heart to afflict and punish. The Lord answers his own people, Jer. 15. 1, 2, 3. that notwithstanding all the prayers and motions of his beloved favou­rites, in their behalfe, his heart could not be towards them: Then his heart was strongly set against them, or upon them in extreame anger; therefore he concludes, they that are for the sword, to the sword, and they that are for destruction, to destruction, &c. If God set his heart to afflict, he will afflict, and he can doe it. And there may be such a sense of the text here. What is man that thou shouldest set thine heart upon him? that thou shouldest come so re­solved, to contest and contend with man, who is but dust and ashes; The words following (though I adhere rather to the former inter­pretation) carry somewhat toward it.

Verse 18. That thou shouldest visit him every morning, and try him every moment?

Here are two acts more about which the question is put. What is man that thou shouldest visit him every morning? And what is man, that thou shouldest try him every moment?

That thou shouldest visit him every morning?

To visit, is taken three wayes, and they may all be applied to this [...] Visitavit in bonum & in malum. text.

To visit, is first to afflict, to chasten, yea to punish; the highest judgements in Scripture, come under the notion of visitations. Exod. 34. 7. Visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children; that is, punishing them. And in the Prophet; Jer. 5. 9. Shall not I visit for this? shall not my soule be avenged on such a Nation as this? Jer. 48. 44. when God came against Moab with those terrible judgements, it is called the yeere of their visitation. I will bring upon it, even upon Moab, the yeere of their visitation. And it is a common speech with us, when a house hath the plague, which is one of the highest stroakes of temporall affliction, [Page 665] we use to say, such a house is visited. Then observe,

Afflictions are visitations. They are called so, because then God comes to search our hearts and lives; afflictions are Gods searchers and examiners. Jerusalem is threatned to be scearcht with candles, and that was the time of Jerusalems visitation. To search with a candle, notes the most accurate searching, as the wo­man when she had lost her groate, lighted a candle, and sought di­ligently till she found it; she visited every hole to find it out. When you see the Lord afflicting, then he is visiting, he lights a candle to search every corner of your lives.

And if afflictions be Gods visitations, it is time for man to visit himselfe, when he is afflicted. We should visit our soules, when God visits our bodies, our estates, our families, or the Kingdome where we live. Woe to those, who doe not visit themselves, when God visits them. The Prophet calls to this duty in a time of sad­dest visitation, Let us search and try our wayes, Lam. 3.

Yet further, If God in affliction visit us, let us visit God; let us answer his visitation of us, with our visitation of him. Lord in trouble have they visited thee, they powred out a prayer when thy chast­ning was upon them. Isa. 26. 16. Would you know what the visiting of God is? It is praying unto him, They visited thee, they powred out a prayer when thy chastning was on them. We visit Heaven in our af­flictions, when we pray much in our afflictions. When God visiteth us, let us visit him, & never give over visiting him, til he remove his visitation from, or sanctifie it to us. That's the first sense.

Secondly, To visit, in a good sence signifies to shew mercy, and to refresh, to deliver, and to blesse; Ruth, 1. 6. Naomi heard how the Lord had visited his people, and given them bread. Gen. 21. 2. The Lord visited Sarah, and she conceived, &c. Exod. 3. 16. The Lord hath surely visited his people, when they were upon daw­nings of deliverance out of Egypt: That greatest mercy and deli­verance, that ever the children of men had, is thus expressed, Luke, 1. 68. The Lord hath visited and redeemed his people. Mercies are visitations, when God comes in kindness and love to do us good, he visiteth us. And these mercies are called visitations, in two respects.

1. Because God comes neer to us when he doth us good: Mercy is a drawing neere to a soule, a drawing neere to a place. As when God sends a judgement, or afflicts, he is said to depart and go away from that place; so when he doth us good, he comes neere, and as it were applies himself in favour to our persons and habitations.

[...]
[...]

[Page 666] 2. They are called a visitation, because of the freenesse of them. A visit is one of the freest things in the world. There is no obliga­tion, but that of love, to make a visit: because, such a man is my friend, and I love him, therefore I visit him. Hence, I say, that greatest act of free-grace in redeeming the world, is called a visi­tation, because it was as freely done, as ever any friend made a vi­sit to see his friend, and with infinite more freedome; there was no obligation on mans side at all, many unkindnesses and neglects there were, God in love came to redeeme man,

Thirdly, To visit, imports an act of care & inspection, of tutorage Idiotismus est elegans apud Hebeaeos pro eo quod est dili­gentissime & exactissime rem investigare. Bold. and direction: The Pastors office over the flock is expressed by this act, Zech. 10. 3. Acts 15. 36. And the care we ought to have of the fatherlesse and widdows, is exprest by visiting of them, Pure Religion (saith the Apostle James) is this, to visit the fatherlesse and widdowes in their affliction, Jam. 1. 27. and Mat. 26. 34. Christ pronounceth the blessing on them, who, when he was in prison, visited him: which was not a bare seeing, or asking, how do you: but it was care of Christ in his imprisonment, and helpfullnesse and pro­vision for him in his afflicted members. That sence also agrees well with this place, What is man that thou shouldest visit him? that is, that thou shouldest take care, have such an inspection over him, look so narrowly to, and provide for him? [...] Singulis mane, quotidie mane, mane autem fi­eri dicitur quod quotidie fit, ac diligenter sedu­lo (que) Drus.

That thou shouldest visit him every morning.

Fvery morning. The Hebrew is, in the mornings. And the word here used for morning, is considerable: There is a two-fold morning, which the Jewes distinguished exactly by their watch. One morning was that, which they accounted from an hour before Sun rising, from the very first breaking of the day, till the Sun ap­peared above the Horizon, which is about the space of an hour: And the word which they use for it is, Shachar, which signifies to be darkish or blackish, because that first morning is somewhat darke: And so the Latini vocant dilucuium, qua­si diei lucula, i. e. parva lux. latine word (diluculum) which is for the first morning, is by Crittiques called, a little of the day; But their other morning, was the space of an houre after Sun-rising, and the root of that word, signifies to seeke or to enquire, to enquire diligently. And the reason why they expresse the second morning so, is, because when the Sun is up, we may seeke and search about our businesse, or go on in our callings and affairs; The height of the day, they call the Reliquum diei tempus, quasi ob majo­rem lucis inten­sionem vocant. [...] Ghetsem Ha­jom, i. e. corpus, sive robur dici, Bold. body or strength, we, the heat of the day; either morning [Page 667] may be here meant, though the word bears the later properly: Thou doest visit him every morning: that is, as soone as the Sun is up, yea as soone as day breakes, or there is any light, thou art visiting. Mans visits are usually in the afternoone: it is an extraordinary thing to visit one in the forenoone, more extraordinary to visit in a morning, and most, early in a morning. Gods visits are extra­ordinary visits, they are visitings in the morning, and visitings every morning, as often as the morning returnes, so often doth God come to visit: not a morning that we misse him.

To doe a thing every morning, notes first the doing of it al­wayes, or secondly, the certaine doing of it; Thou doest visit every morning, that is, as surely and as certain as the Sun riseth, and the morning cometh, so certainly doth God visit man. Or thirdly, it notes the speed, the hast that God makes to visit; He vi­sits in the morning; that is, betimes, God delayes not untill noone, much lesse stayes till it be night; but he cometh in the morning. Psal. 46. 5. God shall heare her, and that right early; the Hebrew is, God shall heare her in the morning, betimes, speedily. The late coming in to work in the vineyard, is exprest by coming at the ele­venth houre; they came speedily, who came in the morning at the first houre. And to shew that we ought not to continue in wrath, and keepe up our anger, it is said, let not the Sunne goe downe up­on your wrath, that is, do not continue all day angry, let your anger goe down speedily, even before the Sunne.

In this sence, Job saith, that God visits man every morning, as a Hic ad conser­vationem & generalem pro­videntiam per­tinet. Metapho­ra a pastori­bus singulis ma­tutinis oves suas recensennti­bus, Coc, shepheard his flock, least any should be hurt or straied; we may ap­ply it, as before in the several sences of visitation, either to Gods visiting of us in afflictions, or in mercies, he afflicts (if he pleases) continually, speedily, certainly. And as sure as the Sun riseth, and the morning cometh, so sure God visiteth his, with mercies, therefore his mercies are said to be renewed every morning, Lam. 3. 23. or fresh every morning. Unlesse God bring new mercies every day, the old would not serve: we cannot bring the mercies of one day over to another: The mercies of a former day, will not support us the next, therefore they must come every morning, sufficient for the day, is the evill thereof. Mat. 6. and, but sufficient for the day, is the good thereof. As we are therefore commanded to pray e­very day for our daily bread: the bread you had the last day, will not serve this day, you must pray for the bread of this day, and for a blessing upon it, that God would visit your bread, and your store [Page 668] in mercy. So if need require, God afflicts every day: And the hearts of some men, want as much the rod every day, as bread e­very day; they could not be without affliction every day, to keep them in order, & God will be as carefull to correct his children, as to feed them. If a man be watchfull over his own wayes, and the dea­lings of God with him, there is seldome a day, but he may find some rod of affliction upon him: But, as through want of care and watchfullnesse, we loose the sight of many mercies, so we doe of many afflictions. Though God doth not every day bring a man to his bed, and breake his bones, yet we seldome, if at all, passe a day without some rebuke and chastning. Psal. 73. 14. I have been chastned every morning, saith he Psalmist: Our lives are full of afflictions; and it is as great a part of a Christians skil, to know afflictions, as to know mercies; to know when God smites, as to know when he girds us; and it is our sin to overlook afflictions, as well as to overlooke mercies.

Secondly, Take the word, as it imports care and inspection, Then observe;

The care of God is renewed every morning: The eye of God is alway upon us: He visiteth so as he telleth all our steps, he tels our very wandrings: He visiteth us so, that we can turne no way but he is with us; his eye of inspection, as a Tutour, as a guide, is ever upon us; he lookes to his people as a shepheard to his flock, who knowes their wandrings.

And try him every moment.

It is of the same sence with the former. Try him. The word [...] Periculum fe­cit, expertus est, tentavit. [...], Sept. signifies an exact and through triall: Some take it to be an allu­sion to the practise of those who set the watch in Armies or Gar­rison Townes; who least their Centinels or Watchmen should sleepe, use to come suddenly upon them (possibly) divers times in a night, to try whether they are faithfull and wakefull; The Pro­phet Isaiah▪ hints at such a custome (chap. 21.) The watchman is set, v. 6th. Goe set a watchman, let him declare what he seeth: The watchman is tried, v. 11. He calleth to me out of Seir, watchman what of the night? watchman what of the night? And it is observed in forraigne parts, that their watchmen in Frontier Towns are tri­ed every houre of the night, the token being, their giving so many tolls with the Bell hanging in their Watch-tower, as the great City-clock strikes. This is a good sence of the place, the Lord visits [Page 669] ns every morning, and tries us every moment, that is, very, very often, as often as may be, to see whether we keep our watches, and stand duely upon our guard.

But secondly, it may note a triall, as a Schollar is tried, by ex­amination: We call it Probation day, when the proficiency of Schollars is examined; God cometh to examine and make proba­tion of mens proficiencie; what have you gotten? how have you improved such times, such opportunities for the gaining of spiri­tuall knowledge? what have you learned, what know you more of your selves? what more of God and Jesus Christ, whom to know is eternall life?

Thirdly, It may note triall by affliction: There are three words 1. [...], 2. [...], 3. [...]. which signifie the troubles, which God brings upon man: They are First, strictly, Judgements, which he sends in wrath upon enemies: Secondly, Chastisments and corrections: Thirdly, Temptations or trials: these are proper to his children. Hence observe;

Afflictions are trials. The Lord proves what grace there is in the heart, & he tries what corruption there is in the heart by affliction. There are many graces in the heart of man untried, and there are some that cannot be tried, till God bring him to an houre of trou­ble. There are many corruptions in the heart of man, which he taks no notice of, nor can, till he is afflicted; many a good soule would not beleeve that they had such an unbeleeving heart, such a proud heart, till God tried him, and then corruption discovered it self. The reason why God brought his people such a way about in the wil­dernesse, was (Deut. 8. 2.) to prove them, to try them, to know what was in their heart. God knowes what is in the heart of man intuitively, and he needs not goe about; he can goe the nee­rest way into every mans heart; he proves it only to make it known to others, and to make a man know himselfe. They could not thinke their hearts were so rebellious, so ful of murmuring and unbeleefe, if God had not taken them about to prove and try them, those forty yeares.

Prosperity and comforts are trials too: whatsoever God doth with a man, he some way or other tries him. Looke not only upon your afflictions as trials, your mercies also are tryals: God gives you them to see what you will doe with them; he gives riches, and honour, and credit, to see how men will use and improve them: as by afflictions, so by outward comforts, he tries both what grace and what corruption is in our hearts. He gives comforts, to see [Page 670] how we can live upon God in Christ, when we have the crea­ture; and that we may shew, how much we make of him, with­out whom we cannot live, when we have all things besides him. Prosperity tries corruption, then pride and creature-confidence breake forth, which before were undiscerned: We say, Magi­stracy shewes a man, nature when it is exalted shewes it selfe, as much as when it is vext.

He trieth every moment: A moment is the least part and divi­sion [...] ad momenta. of time: To try every moment, is to try not only frequently, but continually: Hence observe;

The temper and state of mans heart is so various, that there needs new experiments of him every moment. Why doth God try us every moment? Because we are one moment in one temper, and the next moment in another: The acting frame of a mans heart this houre, cannot be collected, from the frame it was in, an houre before; therefore there is a continuall triall. Some things if they be tried once, they are tried for ever; if we try gold, it will ever be as good as we found it, unlesse we alter it: as we try it to be, so it continues to be; But try the heart of man this day, and come againe the next, and you may find it in a different condition; to day beleeving, to morrow unbeleeving; to day humble, to mor­row proud; to day meeke, to morrow passionate; to day lively and enlarged, to morrow dead and straightned: pure gold to day, and to morrow exceeding drossie. As it is with the pulse of a sick man, it varieth every quarter of an houre, therefore the Physitian tries his pulse every time he comes, because his disease alters the state of his body: so it is with the distempered condition of mans spirit, God having tried our pulse, the state of our spirit, by crosses, or by mercies this day, next day he tryes us too, and the third day he tryes us againe, and so keepe us in continuall trials, be­cause we are in continuall variations: That sicknesse, and disease within us, alters the state and condition of the soule every moment, Our comfort is, that God hath a time wherein he will set our souls up in such a frame, as he shall need to try us but that once. Ha­ving set us up in a frame of glory, he shall not need to try our hearts for us, or to put us to the triall of our selvs any more, we shall stand, as he sets us up to all eternity.

I must yet come downe from the thoughts of this blessed eter­nity, and shew you Job tried out with his time, and earnestly calling, but, for a minutes respire from his paines and sorrows, in the voice of the nineteenth vers.

[Page 671] Verse. 19. How long wilt thou not depart from me, nor let me alone, till I may swallow down my spittle.

In this verse Job makes application of the two former to him­selfe; as if he had said, seeing man is a creature so weake and un­worthy in himselfe, and I am such among the rest, why doest thou visit me, and try me every moment? How long shall it be ere thou depart from me? or, how long wilt thou not looke away from me?

The word under another construction, signifies to looke upon a [...] Quando con­struitur cum [...] significat, aspicere, respi­cere cum dete­ctatione, Gen. 4. 5. sed cum [...] significat avertere, rece­dere. man with respect and complacency. So Gen. 4. 5. The Lord had respect unto, or he looked graciously upon, Abel and his offering. But here to looke away; and so Isa. 22. 4. Looke away from me, I will weepe bitterly. And because they who withdraw their eyes from us, are ready also to withdraw their presence from us, there­fore it signifies to depart. How long wilt thou not depart from me, &c.

But is this the voice of Job? Is he burthen'd with the presence of God? Or doth he thinke the time long, till God be gone from him? The wicked say unto God depart from us (Chap. 21. 14.) And the Lord threatens this as the sorest judgement against his owne people, Jer. 6. 8. Be instructed O Jerusalem, lest my soule depart from thee; And by the Prophet Hosea (Chap. 9. 12.) Woe also unto them, when I depart from them. The promise of stron­gest consolation to the Saints, is this, I will never leave thee nor forsake thee, Heb. 13. 5. And the very offer of a departure, did so afflict Moses, that he was ready to throw up all, Lord, if thy presence goe not along with us, carry us no further (Exod. 33. 15.) How earnestly doe the servants of God deprecate the hiding of his face, how bitterly have they complained upon those hidings, how importunately have they praied, that he would returne, looke on them, behold them, cause his face to shine, and lift up the light of his countenance upon them? And is Job so weary of Gods company, that he beggs of him to depart? Is the voice of Job? Will a man that is in darknesse, bid the Sunne goe from him? Or will a man that is thirstie, say to a fountaine, turne away from me?

I answer, the Lords presence may be considered two waies.

First, as his pleased comforting presence.

Secondly; as his angry afflicting presence. When Job saith, [Page 672] How long wilt thou not depart from me? his meaning is, How long wilt thou not with-draw thine afflicting hand from me. We may expound it by that of David, Psal. 39. 10. Remove thy stroke Usquoque non parcis mihi. Vulg. Iram alio con­verte Jun. away from me, I am consumed by the blow of thine hand. Hence some translate, How long doest thou not spare me? And another glosses, Turne thine anger away from me. Or, as himself speaks of a third person (Chap. 14. 6.) Turne from him, that he may rest, till he shall accomplish, as a hireling his daies. This sence is given us fully in the next clause of the verse.

Nor let me alone, till I may swallow down my spittle.

This is not a refusall of suport from God in the way of his pro­vidence, by which he upholds every creature: For the truth is, if Accipienda sunt haec de Deo affli­gente non pro­vidente, & cu­rante. God should so let us alone, we of our selves are not able to swal­low downe our spittle. We are insufficient barely of our selves, not only for spirituall acts, but also for naturall. We can, not only not pray, and here and believe, and repent without the strength of Christ, but we cannot goe, nor walke, nor eat, nor drinke, nor spit, nor swallow downe our spittle without an assistance (sutable to those acts) from him, for in him we live, and move, and have our being. This letting alone, is like the departing before spoken, in the first clause of the verse. As we use to say to a man assaulting or smiting us, Pray let me alone; Such is Jobs meaning, pray give over these bitter chastenings, leave off to wound or smite me any more.

The word signifies to loosen or untie that which is bound or [...] Dimit [...]ere illud quod tenet liga­t [...]m laxare do­tores, dissolvere funi mos cru­ciatuum. straightned, and so to deal more gently and tenderly, then before. The word is used sometimes in a good sence, to note, that the Lord keepes close and straight to his people, as being knit and bound to them, by the tie and knot of his own love and free-grace. (Josh. 1. 5.) I will never leave thee, or, let thee loose from me. And, as it is applied in the negative to the close-keeping of God to us in love; so in the affirmative, to our departure from God by unbeliefe, Prov. 24. 10. If thou faintest in the day of adversity, or art loo­sened from God, by feare and want of faith, thy strength is small. If thou faintest thus in the time of straights and poverty, it argues, thou hast a very straight, narrow, poore spirit, That's the elegancy of the originall. Si remissus sui­s [...] [...] [...]gu­stiae, angusta foritudo tua.

When Job desires to be let alone or loosened, his meaning is, loosen the bonds of my affliction, take me off from the racke of [Page 673] these tortures and troubles. As we are girded with strength, so also we are girded with weaknesse. Job speaks of God in this word (Chap. 12. 21.) He we [...] the strength of the mighty; The Hebrew is, He looseth [...] of the strong. The same God, who looseth the girdle of our strength, looseth the bands of our infirmity: and therefore Job praies, O depart from me, loosen me, let me alone, let me goe. Hence observe;

First, The Lord can make his owne presence grievous to his own servants. In his presence, there is fullnesse of joy, and at his right hand, there are pleasures for evermore (Psal. 16.) Yet he can make his presence to be the fullnesse of sorrow, and give us paines with his right hand. As he can be to his people like a Sun to warme and comfort them, so like a fire to consume and burne them, as like a shield to defend, so like a sword to wound them. The Lord is a Sunne and a shield (Psal. 84: 11.) yea, and he is sometime as a fire, and a sword, even to those, who walke up­rightly. The sinners in Zion are afraid, fearfullnesse hath sur­priz'd the hypocrites. Who among us shall dwell with devouring fire; who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings; That is, who shall be able to beare the displeased presence of God, which makes him to sinners, as a devouring fire, Isa. 33. 14. And thus the Saints in Sion are sometimes afraid, and fearfullnesse surprizes the upright in heart: Even they cry out, how shall we dwell with this devouring fire, with this everlasting burning? They especially who have sleighted the presence of God, may quickly feele the burden of it. Not only doe they so, who say formally and in plain termes, depart from us; but they also doe it, in a great measure, who doe not prize the presence of God, who doe not welcome and entertaine him, in all his approaches to them. If a friend come to your house, and you will not looke upon him, or speake to him, you bid him be gone, and your silence interprets his non-acceptance with you. Then take heed of neglecting the comforta­ble, and sanctifying presence of God, least you fall speedily into his afflicting presence. The angry presence of God is never so ter­rible to us, as it is, after our undervaluings of his gracious pre­sence.

Secondly, note, if the presence of God chastning, be so grie­vous, what will his presence be punishing and tormenting: If af­flictions, which are but for tryall, and are all steep'd in love, be so grievous; what, will those terrours be, which all steept in [Page 674] pure, everlasting wrath? If his chastnings be so intolerable to some of his dearest friends, what will his revenges be to all his professed enemies? Wi [...] men are now burden'd with the presence of God, becau [...] [...] so holy, they say depart, for we desire not the knowledge [...] thy law, but hereafter they shall find the presence of God burdensome to them, because he is so just; O how will they cry out, How long, shall not thy wrath depart from us! How long wilt thou be angry, for ever, and shall thy jealousie burne like fire for evermore? Yes, that it shall, They, who have so often said in their hearts to God, depart from us, shall heare his voice, saying to them, Depart from me ye cursed, &c. Yee, who have not loved my presence, shall be banished from it for ever. Thirdly, observe;

Troublesome times are very tedious times to us. How long? The Psalmist under some hidings and ecclipses of divine favour, thought himselfe in an everlasting night, Hath the Lurd forgotten to be gracious, &c. Will the Lord cast off for ever? Psalme 77. 8.

Fourthly, observe from the latter branch.

That afflictions are bonds.

Eirst, They should bind and hold us fast from sinne, and to our good behaviour. It is better to be bound fast with the cords of af­fliction, then to be loose and at liberty in the wayes of sin.

Secondly, They will bind us from taking in our worldly com­forts; and sometimes they do (which they ought not) bind us from taking in spirituall comforts.

Fifthly, observe,

That man cannot rescue himselfe out of the bands of affliction, till God please to loosen him. If he bind none can untie; if he im­prison, none can set free; we cannot breake his bands, nor cast away the cords of his afflictions from us. He opens and no man shuts, he shuts and no man opens, Revel. 3. 7. Be yee not mockers, saith the Prophet, least your bands be made strong (Isa. 28. 22.) that is, stronger then they were. So I may say, be yee not stri­vers or strugglers with God, for your bands are made strong. It is said, Exod. 4. 25, 26. That the Lord met Moses in the Inne, and sought to kill him. The Lord is never to seeke to doe what he plea­ses; but thus he speakes after the manner of men, who offer or assay at any businesse, They seeke to do it. But Zipporah having circumcised her sonne, He let Moses goe, It is this word, He [Page 675] slacked or loosened, having before, as it were arrested and atta­ched him, or clapt him in prison for making that great default, the neglect of Circumcision.

Sometimes we find the Lord himself speaking, as if he were at the mercy, or under the power of man, and therefore calling (in this word) to be loosened or let alone, Deut. 9. 14. Let me alone that I may destroy them. The prayer of faith is as a band upon Gods hand, holding him so fast, that he seems, as one that cannot strike or destroy, till a Moses will give him leave, by ceasing to pray unto him. To be sure we are at Gods mercy, and under his power so, that nothing but the prayer of faith can loosen us. And therefore Job doth not attempt to break the cords, or cut them a­sunder, nor seeks he to untie their knots, but desires God himself to do it, let me alone, loosen me: I will be a prisoner, till thou o­penest the door for my deliverance.

As Jephtahs daughter said to him, (Judg. 11. 37.) when he had bound himself and her, in the bands of a rash vow, Let me alone for two months, or loosen me from the ingagement of my vow for two months, as if she had said, I will not loose my self by a wilful refusal, but, doe thou give me a willing dispensation. So a godly man bespeaks the Lord in his straights, Loosen me Lord. Unlesse God be pleased to loosen him, he will be conten­ted, and (when in a good frame of heart, and freeness of spirit) well-pleased with his bands. In some sence he speakes, as Paul and Silas, when they were in prison (Acts 16. 37.) Let the Lord himself come and fetch us out. That is, let us see such means of our inlargement and freedome from trouble, as may assure us, that the Lord hath loosened and enlarged us. A godly man had a thousand times rather be put into a prison by God, than put himself into a paradice. He had rather be bound by Gods hand, than loosened by his own. That place toucht before, may reach this sence (Prov. 24. 10.) if thou faintest (so we) or loos­nest thy self in the day of adversity, Thy strength is small; that is, the strengh of thy faith and patience is small. There is nothing discovers our weakness more than striving to break the cords of our afflictions. The stronger we are in faith, in love, in humility, the more quietly we lie bound. Faith seeks ease and release onely in God: to say Lord loosen me, is a duty, to loosen our selves, is both our sin and our punishment.

[Page 676] Till I may swallow down my spittle.

Some conceive, that from this Hebrew word (Rak) which [...] Saliva, un­dè quidam de­ducunt Raca, Mat. 5. 22. quod [...] in­terpretantur, i. e. conspuendum vel dignum qui con­spuatur Alii a [...] vacum quasi cerebro va­cuus & judicio carens. Drus. we translate spittle, Raca is derived (Mat. 5. 22.) as if to call a man Raca, were as much as to say, he is worthy to be spit upon, or, that one should spit in his face: though others spring that word from Rik, which signifies empty, as if it were, as much as to call a man, an empty fellow, without wit or brains, or within one degree of a foole, which is the next word in Matthew.

But what is Iobs intendment, in desiring God to let him alone, Till he might swallow down his spittle.

First, Some refer it to a bodily distemper, as if Iob were trou­bled with a Inter caetera mala Synanchen habuisse se per­hibet. Hieron. squinsie or sore throat, which hindered the swal­lowing of his spittle.

Dimitta me, ut gustum ali­q [...]em hujus vitae capiam Albert. Another takes it in a Philosophical notion; as if Iob had said, Lord, let me have some ease, that I may at least tast once more, what it is to live, or how sweet life is. For that sence of tast works by the salival humour or spittle in the mouth, which mixing with the juice or sap that is in meats, affects and delights the pallate.

Thirdly, these words are taken, as the discription of a man rea­dy to die, who is disabl'd, either to swallow his spittle, or to void it. As if he had said, I am now even at the point of death, let me alone a little; Davids prayer comes near this sense, Psal. 39. 13. O spare me that I may recover strength, before I go hence, and be no more.

Fourthly, It may be taken proverbially, and that two waies.

First, To note the shortest time, even so much as may serve a Serno proverbi­alis talis est, ne­que ad scalpen­das aures mihi otium est. man to spit. As if he had said, O let me have a little intermis­sion, a little respit; such is the sence of that phrase, Chap. 9. 18. He will not suffer me to take my breath. And the like are those, used in some countries, I have not leisure or time to scratch my ear, or to pare my nails. My sorrows know no interim: my feaver is one continued fit, I have no well daies, no nor a good hour; Ne tantillum quidem temporis est quō non ten­ter a [...]te. Coc. therefore let me at least have so much time of ease, as I may swal­low my spittle, let me have the shortest time. That I may once more know (though but for a moment) what it is to be without pain. To whlch interpretation, that also subscribes, which makes these words to be a circumlocution for silence. For while a man is swallowing his spittle, his speech stops: he cannot bring up his words, and let down the spittle at the same time; so his meaning [Page 677] is, I am forced to complain continually, I would be silent, and forbear speaking, but my grief will not suffer me.

The second proverbial understanding of the word, is, that they Elegans prover­bialis loquutio ad denotandum diligentem in a­lium intuitum quo minim as in alio discernet a­ctiones. Saliva ferè impercepti­biliter obsorve­tur. import, a very strict watch held upon another, in all his motions: so that he cannot stir a finger, or move his tongue (silently) in his mouth unobserved. If I do but stir my tongue, to swallow my spittle (which is one of the most unperceivable acts of man) thou takest notice. O do not hold so strict a hand, and so curious an eye upon me. Let me have a little liberty, do not examine every failing, do not question me upon the least infirmity.

From the former proverbial exposition. Observe, first,

Afflictions are continued upon some without any intermission. Iob had not so much whole skin, as one might set a pin on, nor so much whole time, as a man might spit in. Every hour brought a wound with it, and the renewing of every moment, renewed his affliction. Observe secondly;

A short refreshing may be a great mercy. Dives in hell desires not a large draught, but a drop of water, which alas! could not have eased him so long, as a man is swallowing down his spittle. The eternity of pain in hell, shall not find so much abatement, as that, either in time, or in degree, Every affliction in this life, by how much it is with less intermission, by so much the more like it is to hell, and every comfort by how much the more it is unbro­ken, and without stops, by so much it is the more like to Heaven. Consider then your mercies, who have un-interrupted mercies, dayes and years of ease, and not pained so long, as a man is swal­lowing down his spittle: your mercies are like the glory, and the joy of Heaven.

From the latter proverbial exposition. Note,

That God, observes the least, the most secret motions of man. He tels our steps, our wandrings; and those not onely corporal, but moral and spiritual. He knows how many steps our hearts fetch every day, and how far they travel, Thou hast searched and known me, (saith David, Psal. 139. 1, 2.) and this search is not made in the out-rooms onely, but in the inner parlour and clo­sest closets, Thou understandest my thoughts, and those (not one­ly present, or produced, but to come and unborn) thou knowest them a far off. What can scape that eye, which a thought cannot? And he that sees man swallowing down his spittle, how shall not he both hear and see him, coffing up and [Page 678] spitting out the rottenness and corruption, the filth and flegm of his sinful heart?

JOB Chap. 7. Vers. 20, 21.

I have sinned, what shall I do unto thee, O thou preserver of men? why hast thou set me as a mark against thee, so that I am a burden to my self?

And why doest thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity? for now shall I sleep in the dust, and thou shalt seek me in the morning, but I shall not be.

JOB having in the former part of this Chapter contested with his friends, and expostulated the matter with God: now turns him­self into another posture, even to humble his soul, and make con­fession of his sin. He had justified himself against the accusations of men, but now he accuses, and judges himself in the presence of his God. He will a while forget his sorrows, and bethink himself of his sins, I have sinned, what shall I do unto thee, O thou preserver of men?

The words may be taken two waies.

  • 1. As a confession or a prayer.
  • 2. As a confession or a grant.

I shall first open them under the notion of a repenting prayer and confession of sin.

I have sinned.] As if he had said, Lord, if thou holdest me thus long upon the rack of this affliction, to gain a confession of me, to make me confess, here I am ready to do it, I do it, I have sinned.

The word signifies to miss the mark we aim at, or the way, wherein we would walk. And so it is put strictly, for sins of in­firmity, [...] significat erra­re, aberrare, de­clinare, deflecte­re a via vel scope. when the purpose of a mans heart is (like the Archers, when he draws his bow) to hit the white, or (like the honest travellers in his journey) to keep the right way, and yet he mis­carries, and is drawn aside.

I have sinned.

But is this a sufficient confession? What! to say only in general, I have sinned. Did not hard-hearted Pharaoh (Ezod. 9. 25) [Page 679] False-hearted Saul (1 Sam 15. 24.) and Traitor-Judas) Matth. 27. 4.) make as good a confession as this. Every one of these said, I have sinned, and what doth Job say more? It is surely no great cost nor pain to sinful nature, to bring up such a confession as this.

I answer; First, a general confession may be a sound confessi­on; It is one thing not to express particular sins, with the cir­cumstances of those sins, and another thing purposely to conceale them. I grant, implicit confession may be as dangerous as impli­cit faith. And to digg in the earth, and hide our sins in the Nap­kin of our excuses, is worse than to hide our Talents in the Nap­kin of our idleness. And as it is most dangerous, knowingly to conceale sin from God, so it is very dangerous to do it through ignorance or inadvertency; Some confess sin in general termes only, because they know not what their sins are, or have quite for­got them; As Nebuchadnezzar called the Astrologers, and Sor­cerers, and Chaldeans, and told them he had dreamed a dreame, but he could not tell what it was, For the thing was gone from him, Dan. 2. 5. Some such there are, who can, or, will only say, They have sinned, they have sinned; but what, they cannot tell, or they doe not remember, Those things are gone from them. That which is written of the learned Bellarmine, a great Cardinal, and a Champion for Auricular, particular Confession of sinne to man, seemes very strange, That when he lay upon his death-bed, and the Priest after the Popish manner, came to absolve him, he had nothing to confess: at last he thought of some sleight extra­vagancies of his youth, which was all he had to say of his owne miscarriages: We see a man may de a Schollar in all the knowledg of the world, of nature, and of Scripture, and yet not know his own heart, nor be studied or read in himself. He that is so, in a spi­ritual notion, can never want particular matter in his most in­nocent daies to confesse before the Lord, and to shame himselfe for. What though he hath escaped the pollutions of the world, and is cleansed from the filthiness of the flesh? yet he knowes that still in his flesh there dwels no good thing, and that in his spi­rit, there are, at least touches of, many spiritual filthinesses, as pride, unbelief, &c. besides his great deficiencies in every duty, and in his love to Jesus Christ, which is the ground of all. So then, in any of these sences, to confesse sin only in general, is a sinful confes­sion. And yet Job made a holy confession here, and so did the Pub­lican [Page 680] (Luk. 18.) when he smote his breast and said onely thus, God be merciful to me a sinner.

For secondly, though to speak a general confession be an easie matter, and every mans work; yet to make a general confession, is a hard matter, a work beyond man. As no man (in a spiritual sence) can say, Iesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost; (1 Cor. 12. 3.) so no man can say (in a Holy manner) I have sinned, but by the Holy Ghost; Good and bad, beleevers and unbeleevers, speak often the same good words, but they cannot speak the same things, nor from the same principles; nature speaks in the one, in the other, grace. The one may say, very passionately, he hath sinned, and sometimes almost drown his words in tears, but the other saith, repentingly, I have sinned, and floods his heart with Godly sorrowes.

Thirdly, to clear it yet more, the general confession of the Saints, have these four things in them.

First, Besides the fact, they acknowledge the blot, that there is much defilement and blackness in every sin; that it is the onely pollution and abasement of the creature.

Secondly, They confess the fault, that, they have done very ill in what they have done, and very foolishly, even like a beast that hath no understanding.

Thirdly, They confess a guilt contracted by what they have done, that their persons might be laid lyable to the sentence of the law for every such act, if Christ had not taken away the curse and condemning power of it. Confession of sin (in the strict nature of it) puts us into the hand of justice; though through the grace of the new Covenant, it puts us into the hand of mercy.

Fourthly, Hence the Saints confess all the punishments threat­ned in the Book of God to be due to sin; and are ready to acquit God, whatsoever he hath awarded against sinners: O Lord righ­teousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of face, as at this day, to the men of Iudah, and to the inhabitants of Ierusalem, Dan. 9. 7.

And, as in this confession, for the matter, they acknowledge, the blot, the fault, the guilt, the punishment of sin: so for the manner (which sets the difference yet wider between the general confessions of wicked and Godly men) they confess;

First freely; Acknowledgements of sin are not extorted by the pain and trouble which seazeth on them, as in Pharaoh, Saul and [Page 681] Judas. But when God gives them best dayes, they are ready to speak worst of themselves: And when they receive most mer­cies from God, then God receives most and deepest acknowledge­ments of sin from them. They are never so humbled in the sight of sin, as when they are most exalted in seeing the salvations of the Lord. The goodness of God leads them to this repentance, they are not driven to it, by wrath and thunder.

Secondly, they confess, feelingly; when they say they have sin­ned, they know what they say. They taste the bitterness of sin, and groan under the burdensomeness of it, as it passes out in confes­sion. A natural mans confessions run through him, as water through a pipe, which leaves no impression or sent there, nor do they (upon the matter) any more taste what sin is, then the pipe doth of what relish water is. Or if a natural man feels any thing in confession, it is the evil of punishment feared, not the evil of his sin committed.

Thirdly, they confess sincerely; they mean what they say, & are in earnest both with God and their own Souls. Blessed is the man in whose spirit there is no guile, Psal. 32. 2. The natural man casts out his sins by confession, as Sea-men cast their goods over-board in a storm, which in the calm they wish for again. They so cast out the evil spirit, that they are content to receive him a­gain when he returns, though it be with seven worse then him­self. Even while they confess sin with their lips, they keep it, like a sweet bit, under their tongues: And wish it well enough, while they speak it very ill.

Fourthly, they confess beleevingly; while they have an eye of sorrow upon sin, they have an eye of Faith upon Christ: Iudas said he had sinned in betraying innocent blood (Mat. 27. 4.) but instead of washing in that blood, he defiles himself with his own, he goes away and hangs himself. No wicked man in the world (continuing in that state) did ever mix Faith with his sorrowes, or beleeving, with confessing, he had sinned. So much for the clea­ring of the words, and the sence of this general confession. Hence observe, first,

While a Godly man maintains his innocency, and justifies himself before men, he willingly acknowledges his infirmity, and judges him­self before God. Iob had spent much time in wiping off the asper­sions cast upon him by his friends, but he charges himself with his failings in the sight of God. Secondly observe,

God speakes better of his servants then they doe of themselves. When God speakes of Job, we find not one blot in all his cha­racter, all is commendation, nothing of reproof. He saith (c. 1. v. 21.) in all this Job sinned not: but for all that, Job saith, I have sinned: A hypocrite hath good thoughts of himself, and speakes himself faire; He flatters himself in his own eyes, until his iniqui­tie be found to be hateful, Psal. 36. 2. A godly man thinks and speaks low of himself, he accuses himself in his own eyes, though his integrity be found very acceptable with the Lord. Thirdly observe,

The holiest man on earth, hath cause to confess that he hath sinned. Confession is the duty of the best Christians. First, The highest form of believers in this life, is not above the actings of sin; though the lowest of believers, is not under the power of it. And if the line of sinning be as long as the line of living, then the line of confessing must be of the same length with both. While the Ship leaks, the pump must not stand still. And so long as we gather ill humors, there will be need of vomits and purgings.

Secondly, Confession is a soul-humbling duty, and the best have need of that, for they are in most danger of being lifted up above measure. To preserve us from those self-exaltations, the Lord sometimes sends the Messenger of Satan to buffet us by tempta­tions, and commands us to buffet our selves often by confession.

Thirdly, Confession affects the heart with sin, and ingages the heart against it. Every confession of the evill we do, is a new ob­ligation not to do it any more. The best in their worst part, have so much freedome to sin, that they have need enough to be bound from it in variety of bonds.

Fourthly, Confession of sin, shews us more clearly our need of mercy, and indears it more to us. How good and sweet is mercy to a soul, that hath tasted, how evil, and how bitter a thing it is to sin against the Lord. How welcome, how beautiful is a pardon, when we have been viewing the ugliness of our own guilt?

Fiftly, Confession of sin, advances Christ in our hearts. How doth it declare the riches of Christ, when we are not afraid to tell him, what infinite sums of debt we are in, which he onely, and he easily can discharge? how doth it commend the healing vertue of his blood, when we open to him such mortal wounds and sick­nesses, which he only, and he easily can cure? Wo be to those who commit sin abundantly, that grace may abound; but it is our duty [Page 683] to confesse sinne aboundantly, that grace may abound.

Lastly, Though we need not confesse sin at all to informe God: he knowes our sins, though we will not make them known; and hath an eye to see, though we should not have a tongue to confes. Though (I say) we confesse not to informe God what we are, or what we have done, yet, we must confesse to glorifie God. While we shame our selves, we honour him. My sonne (saith Joshua to Achan. c. 7. v. 19) give I pray thee glory to the Lord God of Is­rael; and make confession unto him: Every attribute of God, re­ceives this gift of glory by mans confession. Justice is glorified, and mercy is glorified, patience is glorified, and holinesse is glori­fied. Holinesse is glorified in opposing sin, and patience in sparing the sinner; mercy is glorified in pardoning sin, and justice in receiv­ing satisfaction at the hand of Christ for the pardon of it. Fourthly observe.

Holy confession of sin, leades the way to gratious pardoning of sin, Job begins the next verse with a vehement prayer for pardon. And why doest thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity. Sin concealed and kept close, growes upon us: And it growes three wayes; First, in the strength of it; Secondly, in the guilt of it; Thirdly, in the terrour and vexation of it, Psal. 32. 3, 4. When I kept silence, my bones waxed old, through my roaring all the day long. Confession is a meanes to obtaine the abatement of sin, in all three. The strength of it is weakened, the guilt remo­ved, and the terrour overcome. Then heare the counsell of the Pro­phet (Isa. 43. 26.) declare that thou mayest be justified.

Thus farre of the words as they are a confession of sin. I shall now handle them, as they are a concession or a grant that he had sinned; and so the sence may be given thus: I have sinned. what shall I doe unto thee? As if he had said; Let it be granted, or sub­pose that I have sinned, and sinned as deepely as my friends have charged me; sup [...]e I have been as wicked as they imagin, what th [...]n if this were my case, what shall I doe unto thee O thou preserver of men:

The later words plainly import a question, What shall I doe un­to thee? But the sence of the question is not so plaine: The que­stion may be taken two wayes: Either affirmatively, or negative­ly. Take it affirmatively; and so the sence is, what shall I doe? that is, Lord direct, me, councell me, order me, teach me what becomes me to doe in such a case, in such a sinfull condition as [Page 684] I, either, confesse my selfe to be in, or, am supposed to be in. That's the affirmative sence.

What shall I doe?] The word which we translate [do] signifies [...] a radice pag­nal, respondet Graeco [...], est agere cum energia & effectu, Piscat. working or doing, under a two fold qualification.

1. Working with great willingnesse and readinesse of mind; and hence it is applied to the workings of sin in naturall men, who work with the greatest freedome that can be. Man sins naturally, and therefore freely: he is carried on with a full swing, with tide and wind he sins, nothing in himself contradicting or giving a con­trary vote: He is a true worker of iniquity, Psal. 5. 5.

2. Working with energie and successe, and the doing of a thing not only effectually, but willingly, Numb. 23. 23. What hath God wrought? When God works, he works thoroughly; he doth not his busines to halves. So Isa. 26. 12. Thou hast wrought all our works in us; that is, thou hast brought them to passe, they have succeeded through thy help, and the influences of thy blessing.

The word being taken in this height of sence, & the question for an affirmation, What shall I doe? that is, shew me, direct me what to do; we may observe from it, First, That,

What to do in case of sin, is a point of the highest consideration, I have sinned, what shall I do? If ever we have need to go and aske counsell, to sit down and debate the mater with our sevles or others, it is, when we have sinned. Such is the nature of sin, and such the conse­quences, that it calls us to highest consideration what to do about it. Matters of great consequence, are matters of great consultati­on: Sin hath an influence upon an eternity. If any thing be more worthy your thoughts then that, let it have them.

Secondly, Look upon the question as following Jobs confession: Observe thence,

That sincere confession of sin, makes the soule very active and inquisitive about the remedies of sin. I have sinned; the very next word is, What shall I doe? Many make confession of sin, who are never troubled about the cure and redresse of sin; Lord what shall I doe? is not the next question to, Lord, I have sinned. Nay, it may be the next action is, to sin over the same sin, they have con­fest. As soon as those Jewes heard of the foulenesse of their sin in crucifying Christ, and of the sadnesse of their condition; their que­stion is like this of Job, what shall we doe? what shall we doe that we may be saved? As Christ speakes to the woman of Samaria (Job. 4. 10.) when he offered her the water of life, If thou didst [Page 685] know the gift of God, and who it is that speakes unto thee, thou wouldest have asked, &c. That is, if thou wert sensible of the excel­lency and vertue of this water, and thy need of it, thou wouldest be very inquisitive how to get it, how to have a tast of it. As in regard of Christ, and the benefits we have by him; so of sin, and the evils which come by it: When a man hath confest and acknowledged his sin, we may say to him, if thou didst but know what thou hast confest, if thou didst but know what thou hast acknowleged, thou wouldest presently be asking, how shall I get free? how shall I get clear of these sins wch are so deadly, poisonous, destroying & con­demning? He that is but sensible what the wound of sin is, wil never be at rest, never give over enquiring, til he hath found a plaister or a medicine for it. He that knowes what he saith, when he saith I have sinned, will resolve, as David in another case, that his eyes shall not have a winke of sleep, till he sees where to have helpe against it.

Thirdly, In that he saith, what shall I doe? Observe,

That a soule truly sensible of sin, is ready to submit to any termes which God shall put upon him. What shall I doe unto thee, O thou preserver of men? Put what termes thou wilt upon me, I am ready to accept them. That was the sence of their question (Acts 2. 32.) what shall we do? shew us the way, let it be what it will, we will not stand making of conditions, we will not pick and choose, this we will doe, and that we will not doe, this we will submit unto, and that we will refuse; no, let the Lord write what articles he pleases, we intend not to debate, but yeeld and subscribe unto them. When the Jaylor found himself in the bonds of his iniquity, he was ready to enter into any bonds of duty, Acts 16. 30. Sirs, what must I doe to be saved?

Lastly, From the question in the affirmative, Observe,

That God is to be consulted and enquired after in all doubt­full cases, especially in our sin-cases. I have sinned, what shall I doe unto thee, O thou preserver of men? He calls upon God, to know what he should doe, and to learne what course he should take. Though, when we have opportunity to speake to men, that's good, and a duty; yet we must not rest in the counsels of men, what to doe in sin-cases: God must be consulted. After the people had committed idolatry in making the Calfe, you have sinned (saith Moses) and now I will goe up unto the Lord, that I may make an attonement for you; I will goe up to the Lord, that I may under­stand from him, what course to take for the removing of this sin, [Page 686] though we have not such a mount to goe up unto, as Moses then had to speake to God; yet there are wayes for the soule in all sin­cases, to make addresses unto God; A sinner may say, I will goe to the Lord, and make my attonement: whatsoever advice and dire­ction we receive from men, we must enquire whether it be an advice and counsel established in Heaven. And the reason is cleare, God is the person offended in every sin, and therefore he must be consulted about the remedy of sin. Again, God only can resolve us what will please him; we may pitch upon a wrong course, and take a wrong way; we in stead of pacifying God, may provoke him? in stead of satisfying, further displease him: Therefore we must say, when we have sinned, Lord what wilt thou have us to doe? his advice will lead us to Christ for ease and peace.

So farre for the question taken in the affirmative sence, What shall I doe unto thee? shew me what I shall doe, and I will readily submit unto it.

Secondly, Take the question negatively, what shall I doe unto thee? And so I find two sences of it.

First, Some render it thus, what have I done against thee? and Quid tibi neeui ant quid te lasi, Olymp. then the meaning is this, I have done nothing against thee, or I have not hurt thee by sinning: What have I done against thee? wherein have I injured thee, that thou layst thy hand thus severely upon me in these grievous afflictions, both upon my soule and bo­dy? I am hurt, what have I hurt thee? There is a truth in this: though I take it not for the truth of this place. A man may say Paeecana nostra beautm illam naturam tabe­factare non pos­sunt. when he hath sinned what hurt have I done unto God? and yet all the hurt and wrong which God receives, he receives by sin. Our sins are no hurt unto God, by abating any thing of his happinesse, or fullnesse, or intrinsicall essentiall honour; take it thus, and our sins cannot hurt God: All the darts of our sins, fall infinitely short of God, they cannot reach him, so, as to annoy him: And we have that language expressely in the 35 Chapter of this book of Job, ver 6. If thou doest sin what doest thou against him? (that is, thou doest nothing against God, as a real dammage to him) or if thy transgressions be multiplied, what doest thou unto him? Sin as many sins as you can, you cannot impare the happinesse of God, or diminish his greatnesse: he is out of the reach of the crea­ture in that sence. As on the other side, if a man be never so holy and good, or do never so many acts of righteousnesse, yet God hath no good or gain by it, we cannot advantage God by our holiness; [Page 687] and that is the language of this Scripture too, Job 35. 7. If thou be righteous, what givest thou him; or what receiveth he of thine hand? We make no addition to the happinesse of God by all our holinesse, Job. 22. 3. Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous? Or any gaine unto him that thou makest thy waies perfect? That which is infinite cannot increase, neither can it be increased. God is a above all gaine and losse, above all accesses of pleasure or paine. When the Scripture saith, he is delighted in the services of the Saints, and takes pleasure in his people, we must un­derstand them in the same sence, as those Scriptures, which describe him displeased with the sins of men, angry and grieved, because of their provocations. All the motions of Gods delight or griefe, pleasednesse or displeasure, are only expressions towards the crea­ture, not any impressions upon himself. But I shall let that sence passe.

Secondly, in the negative, take the question thus, What shall I doe unto thee? Or, as the Septuagint reades it, What can I doe unto thee? That is, I can doe nothing to thee? Lord I have sin­ned, and if thou seekest for satisfaction at my hands, I am able to make none. And so he speaks like a poore, undone, broken man, to his rich creditour arresting him for a dept, which he is unable to pay. The poore man fals downe at his feet, and saith, Sir, I con­fesse I owe you a great summe, you have my bonds, I confesse my hand and seale, but what shall I doe unto you? I cannot pay you a penny, I have nothing, I have lost all, I am not worth a groat, what will you have of me? This sounds such a kind of mel­ting, pitifull language, I have sinned, what shall I doe unto thee; O thou preserver of men? Lord, when I looke into my stock, in­to my treasure & revenues, I see I have nothing to satisfie this debt of sinne, I have run in, and stand engag'd to thy Majestie for; what can I pay thee? And so the word [doe] signifies a retribu­tion or recompence; so it is used in the second verse of this Chap­ter, where he speaks of the hireling, waiting for his worke, that is, for the reward of recompence of his worke, the paiment of his wages. What shall I doe? is as much, as, what shall I pay, or what shall I render? This is a due debt, but I have nothing to pay, no way of making satisfaction, for all the dammage I have put thy holy Majesty to, by my sins.

Or thus, there may be a three-fold negation in the Question, What shall I doe unto thee?

First, I can doe nothing to escape thy power, I cannot get a way from thee, J cannot rescue my selfe from under thy hand.

Secondly, I can doe nothing to satisfie thy justice.

Thirdly, I can doe nothing, to pacifie thine anger. J cannot only not pay the dept, but I cannot appease thee, or turn away thy displeasure in the least degree.

From the Question taken in this sence, we may observe. First, That,

The holiest man on the earth by all his sufferings and doings cannot satisfie the justice of God for one sin. I have sinned, what shall I doe unto thee? When the Angels had sinned, what could they doe unto God, in this respect? These three negations lay up­on them, and doe lie to this day, and shall to all eternity. They sin­ned but once, yet could they not escape out of the hand of God. Though spirits and powers, yet they could not maintaine their state against the power of God, and are therefore cast into prison, and reserved in chaines of darknesse to the judegement of the great day. They could not pacifie the wrath of God towards them, God is as highly displeased, and his wrath burns as hot against them, as ever. Now if sinning Angels could doe nothing to God, what can sinfull man doe? The Question is put Micha 6. 6. Where with shall I come before the Lord? And bow my selfe be­fore the high God? Shall I come before him with burnt-offerings? with calves of a yeare old? will the Lord be pleased with thou­sands of rams? or with ten thousand rivers of oyle? shall I give my first-borne for my transgression? the fruit of my body for the sin of my soule? These Questions are denials; come not before God with any of these. Then what is it, that God doth require? He hath shewed thee, what is good, to doe judgement and righte­ousnesse, to walk humbly with thy God. But why these things? What, though I cannot make a price for my sin with calves and rams, and rivers of oyle, though my children will not be ac­cepted as a ransome for my transgressions, yet can I make a price for them, out of justice and righteousnesse and humble walking? No, not out of these neither. The Lord doth not require these, for the paiments of our debt, as we are sinners, but for the paiments of duty, as we are creatures. There is a double debt to God: a debt to the justice of God for sins commited, and a debt to the law of God for duties enjoyned. The former no man is able to pay, but with [Page 689] eternall sufferings. The latter, the Saints (through grace) do pay by their dayly holy actings.

There is a three-fold deficiency in al that man can do, to satisfie the justice of God.

Frist, all is imperfect and defiled, our services smell of the ves­sell, thorough which they passe, and taste of the caske into which they are put. There is a stampe of our sinfullness even upon our ho­ly things. And can that which is sinfull satisfie for sin?

Secondly, whatsoever we doe is a debt, before we doe it. All our duties are owing before we performe them. And can we pay the debt of sin, by those duties which were due, though sin had ne­ver been commited?

Thirdly, The greatest deficiency is this, our works want the stampe of Gods appointment for that purpose. God hath no where set up mans righteousnesse, as satisfaction for mans unrighteous­nesse. Hence, if it should be supposed, we had performed perfect righteousnesse according to the whole will of God commanded, yet we could not satisfie the justice God offended, unlesse God had said, that he would accept that way of satisfaction; it is the appointment and institution of God, which renders what we doe acceptable unto himselfe. Surely, all that Jesus Christ did or suf­fered for us in the flesh, had not satisfied the justice of God, if God had not appointed that Christ should come to doe and suffer those things for the satisfying of his justice. It was the compact between Christ and his Father, which made him a Saviour, Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire. Sacrifices were refused by God, it being impossible, that they should purge sin (Heb. 10. 4.) Then the eare of Christ was opened or bored; as a servant, according to the law in that case, Exod. 21. 6. to receive and doe the will of his Father. Or, as the Seventy interpret, which the Apostle fol­lows, God prepared him a body. Then Christ undertakes the worke, And said, loe I come to doe thy will O God. Why? In the volume of the booke it is written of me. That is, thou hast decreed and ordained from everlasting; The record is cleare for it, that I am he, whom thou hast ordained to doe thy will: Hence the A­postle concludes at the 10th verse, That we are sanctified (that is, saved) by that will through the offering of the body of Jesus once for all: As inserting, that the very offering of the body of Jesus Christ could not save us, but by the will and ordination of God. His hanging and dying on the crosse had not delivered us from [Page 690] death, unlesse it had been written in the volume of the Booke. There is nothing satisfactory, but what the law, or the will of the Law-giver makes, or agrees to accept, as satisfactorie. In the vo­lume of the booke, there is nothing written, which appoints man such a work, and therefore he cannot doe it.

There is some what to be done by way of thankfullnesse, but no­thing can be done by way of paiment. That question (Psal. 116. 12.) affirmes as much, What shall I render unto the Lord for all his benefits? We must render unto the Lord for his benefits; but we cannot render to the Lord for our sins. We ought to take up the Cup of Thanksgiving: but Christ hath, and he alone was able, and he alone was ordained to take and drinke the Cup of Satisfy­ing.

Secondly, observe (which depends upon the former.)

That pradon and forgivenesse of sinne, come in at the doore of free-grace. Free-grace doth all. What can I do? J can doe no­thing, O thou preserver of men; J can only (nor that without thy helpe) acknowledge my sin: it must be thine infinite goodness to pardon it. When a man hath travell'd through all duties and doings, he must at last sit downe in Gods love, and rest in this, that God is mercifull to poore sinners, Isai. 55. 1. Come unto me, O all yee that are thirstie, come without money or without price: There is nothing in the creature that God requires as a price of his favor: his milk and his hony, his bread and his water are al gifts and bounties unto his people. He cals us to buy these because we shall have them, as willingly from God, as any things from man, for our mony; & he cals it a buying without mony, because no value can be set upon it high enough, nor any heart receive it freely enough. To offer mony, that is, to think to obtain any of that favor, by what we do, is the most dangerous offer in the world. We read how dread­ful the issue was to Simon Magus, when he offered mony, for the gifts of the holy Ghost, and yet those gifts were such, as a man may have, and go to hell with them, for they were but gifts of mira­cles and of healing, and the like: But this gift of the favour and love of God in the pardon of sin, is such a gift, as whosoever hath it, is sure and safe for ever: And therefore (the gift being much more precious than that of Simon Magus) Take heed of offering this kind of mony for it, your works and doings. To doe so is the worst Simonie in the world. Better offer literall money for those gifts of the holy Ghost, then this figurative money for the fa­vour [Page 691] of God in the pardon of sin. What Peter threatned Simon Magus, may be affirmed of them. Their money must perish with them, That is, their prayers and teares, their sorrows and their humblings, their almes and good deeds, forasmuch as they have thought, that this gift of pardon may be obtained by such money. They have neither part nor lot in that mercy, for their hearts are not right in the sight of God. A good worke trusted to, is as mortall, as a sin unrepented of.

Againe, There is somewhat to be done, when we have sinn'd but nothing to be paid. That's Gospel-language, when a man hath sinned, to say, What shall I doe? Those converts in the Acts who enquired, What shall we doe? were told by the Apostles of some what to be done, Repent and be baptized, believe and thou shalt be saved. These are waies wherein salvation is tender'd, not works for which it is bestowed. It is a dangerous error, so to lift up the grace of God, as to deny the industry of man through grace, & because he can do nothing by way of satisfaction, that, therefore he must doe nothing. The Apostles gave Gospel-counsell, yet when men asked them, what shall we doe to be saved? They said not, ye must doe nothing, God will save you by his free-grace: no, they called them to repent and beleeve, &c. Take heed, when ye have sinned, to say we need not mourne for sin, we need not be humbled, we need not repent, for, Lord, what can we do unto thee, O thou Saviour of men? These are the inferences of our own spi­rits, not of the Spirit of Christ. They who lift up the grace of Christ, to lessen the necessity of gracious actings in themselves, shew they know not the meaning of his grace, and have not indeed tasted how gracious the Lord is. To deny our owne righteousnesse, and to be very active in the waies of righteousnesse is the due Gospel­temper. The Apostle, Phil. 3. 8. counts all things but losse and dung; all duties and humblings, all legall righteousnesse and o­bedience, not that he refused righteousnesse, or neglected duties, but he would not mingle them with Christ, or bring them in as contributions to the purchase of blessednesse. Our righteousnesse and holy duties are dung and drosse in justification; but they are gold and precious things in sanctification: without these, we can­not walk worthy of our holy calling, or, as it becomes the Gospel of Christ.

So much for these words, what shall I doe unto thee?

[Page 692] O thou preserver of men!

Here is the Compellation, or the title, under which Job be­speaks the Lord (and it is a royall one) The preserver of men. [...] Narsar conser­vavit, observa. vit, custodivit, dise dit, de qua­libet custodia dicitur & sig­nificat etiam se ris vectebas (que) elaudere licet proprie custos [...] dicitur, sed con­fundi scias. Drus. The words signifies, both to preserve and to observe; and hence it is applied to our keeping the law of God, Psal. 119. 22. I have kept thy testimonies, I have kept them, by observation, that is, I have obeyed thy Commandements. The word is often applied to God, in reference to mans protection and preservation, Deut. 32. 10. Moses describes the care of God over his people Israel, He found them in the wildernesse (as a people wandring and going a­stray) and he kept them as the apple of his eye; that is, he looked to them and had a continuall tender care over them. So Psal. 17. 8. Keep me as the apple of thine eye.

The Septuagint render it, O thou observer of men; What shall I doe unto thee, O thou who art the observer and looker into the very hearts of men? Lord saith he, what wilt thou have me to doe? Thou lookest quite through me, and seest all that is in me, I [...], qui prespectam ha­bis mentem ho­minum Sept. need not declare my selfe unto thee, thou knowest me altogether, Thou who art the searcher of the heart, and the trier of the reins; Thou who art a most vigilant watcher over all my waies, what have I done, or spoken, but thou knowest and canst easily observe. Thus Job speaks at the 14th of this booke, vers. 16. Thou numbe­rest my steps; a man observes another curiously, when he tels how many steps he treads, it is an expression, noting the exactest ob­servation. Salomon joynes the act of keeping with observing, Prov. 24. 12. If thou saiest, behold he knoweth it not (this is the refutation of an Atheist) doth not he that pondereth the hears, consider it, and he that keepeth thy soule, doth not he know? He that preserves us in our wayes, must needs see us in all our waies.

Again, Preserving or keeping may be understood two waies.

First, There is a preserving or keeping of man, that he shal not escape. And

Secondly, A preserving or keeping of man, that he shall not Custos hominu, sc. qui homine talibus malis quasi quadam custodia inclu­dis it non sit ef­fugium. take hurt. Some understand it in the first sence, O thou preserver of men! that is, O thou, who art so strict a keeper and watcher over men, that they cannot escape thine hand. A man is said to be in safe custodie, when he is a prisoner, and so the sence is thus given, Lord, thou hast me fast enough, I cannot breake away [Page 693] from thee, I am lockt up within iron-gates and barrs, what woul­dest thou have me doe unto thee? Thou maiest put what conditi­ons thou pleasest upon me, I must submit. Such language we have (Lam. 3. 5, 7.) which may illustrate this, He hath builded against me, and compassed me with gall and travell, he hath hed­ged me about, that I cannot get out, he hath made my chaine hea­vie. You see, he speakes of God (as we may speake with reve­rence) as of the master of a prison, who saith to his under-offi­cers, there is such a one, looke to him well make his chaine hea­vie, that he may not get a way, put him in a place, where there is a strong wall, least he breake prison. This sence of the word makes Job speaking like Jeremy, He hath builded against me, he hath compassed me about, he hath made my chaine heavie upon me.

But the second sence, according to the letter of our Translation, is most cleare and apt, O thou preserver of men! Thou, who kee­pest man, least he take hurt or fall into danger; As if Job had be­spoke God, thus, Thou art the Saviour and protectour of men, thou hast not only given man a being, but thou providest for his well-being: thou art a preserver of our outward estates, and a pre­server of our spirituall estates; A God, in whom we live, move, and have our being, as well, as we receive being, life and motion from thee; and therefore seeing such is thy nature, and this thy office, to be a preserver of men, what wouldst thou have me to doe unto thee? Why dost thou thus destroy me, and breake me to peeces? Why dost thou follow me with affliction upon affliction, till I am utterly ruin'd and undone? Thus Jacob (Gen, 28. 15.) If thou wilt keepe me in the way that I shall go, he makes a vow to God, and indents or articles with God to be kept and preserved by him, The word there is Thomer, but that and this are used promiscu­ously, as Psal. 121. 4. The keeper of Israel, In the word of the text, and Psal. 31. 23. The Lord preserveth the faithfull; he pre­serveth them, from the reach of dangers and troubles incompassing them on every side.

So then in this title, we have the worke and office of God held forth, the second act of his power. The first is the act of creation, the second is this act of preservation or providence. Preservation or ptovidence is a continued creation. Observe from this title; First.

Man wants a preserver. If God having made man, and set [Page 694] him in the world, had left him to his own keeping, what would become of him? When God trusted man to goe a little alone, and did not hold a speciall hand of preservation over him, to keepe him from or in temptation, how quickly did he fall and loose him­selfe? Man like a little child (which if the mother or the nurse lea­veth alone unwatched or uneyed) runs into dangers and deaths e­very moment. Man is a weake creature, therefore he needs a preserver. Againe, man (as fallen especially) is a foolish crea­ture, he hath no understanding to guide himselfe, he is as ignorant as a child (if God leave him) how to dispose of his own waies, and order his goings; The way of man is not in himselfe, neither is it in him that goeth to direct his own steps.

Lastly, Man walks in the midst of enemies. He is beset with dangers, therefore he needs a protectour; what would become of a man, living in a throng of adversaries, were it not that he hath a God, whose name is the preserver of men?

It is good for us to know God by this Name in every letter of it, in the full extent of it.

First, Immediately, his owne hand and out-stretched arme, is our safety, Zech. 2. 5. I will be unto Jerusalem a wall of fire round Mirus sane Dei amor in populu suum, mira pre­videmia Sanct. in Zech. 2, about; If you want a wall, I will be your wall, my immediate providence shall be your defence, rather then you shall not be de­fended. Is my strength the strength of stones, or is my flesh brasse? was Jobs question, Chap. 6. 12. We may resolve it, the strength of God is more then the strength of stones, and he, The Spirit is more firme then brasse. The Romans in their warrs used to call out the Tutelar gods of those Cities they besieged, &c. as believing them a stronger defence to those places, than wals or forts. And yet our God is more then a wall of stone or brasse, he promised to be a wall of fire. Now, who can batter downe a fire, that is it's own fewell, or who can set up ladders to scale the flames?

And as the Lord is a wall of fire, so a wall of water for the safety of his people, Isa. 33. 21. there will I be a place of broad rivers, and of streames; that is, I will be their preservation; the broad river preserves a place from the invasion of enemies: waters are stronger then bulwarks of stones. And least any should object, though broad rivers keepe of Foot or Horse, yet they give advan­tage to ships; therefore it is added, I will be such a river to thee, as wherein shall goe no galley with oares, neither shall gallant Ship passe thereby. But if any shall venture their Navies upon [Page 695] these streames to thy annoyance, then know (as the 23. vers. intimates). Their tacklings shall be loosed, they shall not well strengthen their masts, they shall not spread their sailes; They shall be so ruffled and entangled, that the lame shall take the prey, that is, the weakest resistance shall subdue them and make prize of their whole fleete, even of their invincible Armado's. I love the Lord my strength, my rock, my tower, my fortresse, my buckler, the horne of my salvation; Ps. 18. 1, 2. all these titles meete in this one, The preserver of men.

Secondly, God is a preserver of men mediatly by instru­ments: he preserves man by man, and man sometimes by the beasts of the earth, and fowles of the ayre, but chiefely he pre­serveth men by Angels; Are they not ministring spirits, sent out for the good of those that shall be heires of salvation? (Psa. 91.) He shall give his Angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy wayes, they shall beare thee up in thy wayes, least thou dash thy foote against a stone. A promise so full of sweetnesse for faith to feed on, that the devil hath no way to elude it, but by tempting us (as he did Christ) to over-act it, & surfet faith into a presumption, by a wilfull needlesse throwing our selves into danger.

And there is a necessity that God himself should thus take upon him the preservation of men: This necessity is three-fold.

1. None are strong enough to preserve us without him, our ene­mies would breake thorough all strength below God: so that, if he were not our preserver, none could: In vaine is salvation hoped for from hils, and from the multitude of mountains; truly in the Lord our God is the salvation of Israel. Jer. 2.

2. None are wise enough to preserve us, except the Lord. As evill spirits are powers, for strength; so likewise serpents, for po­licie and craft; this craft of hell cannot be discovered, much lesse disappointed, without wisedome from Heaven.

3. None but God are patient enough to be the preservers of men, I beleeve if the Angels left to their naturall temper, were set to be keepers of men, they had all given over this charge long before this time, as it is supposed, they who fell, refused to under­take, or take it up, at first, Angels have not the patience to keepe such a froward peece as man. It is a wonder God doth not give over that care, and in stead of preserving dash him in peeces. When the Lord told Moses, he would send an Angel before him, and drive out the Canaanite (Exod. 34. 2.) For I will not goe up [Page 696] in the midst of thee, for thou art a stiffe-necked people, least I consume thee in the way. The text saith, when the people heard this evill tidings, they mourned, and no man did put upon him his ornaments. Why, what was it that troubled them? was it that the Angel is sent now to conduct them to Canaan? That was told them (Chap. 23. 20.) and they well satisfied with it, Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keepe thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. I answer, The Angel in the 23. Chapter is by all (that I meet with) agreed to be the Lord Jesus Christ, the great Angel of the Covenant; but the An­gel, chap. 33. appeares to be a created Angel and rather threat­ned them, then promised them. And though the Lord is pleased to signifie a reason of sending this Angel in favour to them, namely, least he himselfe consume them in the way, for their stubbornesse. Yet the people are not satisfied with this tidings; surely they thought if the Lord was not able to bear their provocations, much lesse could an Angel, and therefore if he should send an Angel, and withdraw his own presence from them, they must perish; A meere Angel could not have borne their manners as the Lord did; receiving provocations from them, and continuing preserva­tions over them those forty yeares.

It is yet further observeable, that the Hebrew is not only singular, but a particular: The preserver of Adam, or, of that man, which hath some speciality in it, We translate in ge­nerall, the preserver of men; but the preserver of man, or of that man, is more emphaticall. God preserveth all, but he hath a spe­ciall eye of preservation upon some, Thou preservest man and beast, saith the Psalmist, the beasts of the earth are preserved, but man is preserved more: And among men, some are more preserved. It is a truth, the great God preserveth his greatest enemies; a wicked man were not able to lift up a hand or a tongue against him, if God did not uphold him: but God is the speciall preserver of that man, that is, the preserver of a godly man, or of godly men. As Christ is the Saviour of all men, but especially of those that beleeve; so the preserver of all men, but especially of those that beleeve; he hath a care of them, beyound the care he hath of the world. The care which God hath of the rest of the world, compared with that towards his own, is but carelessenesse, and he (as it were) neg­lects the whole world to looke to his own people. As it was said of Constantine, that for the love he bare to Constatinople, he undress'd [Page 697] and unadorn'd al the other Cities of the Empire, to beautifie and adorn that: God seems to take off from al men in the world, to lay it on, upon his people; The very gleanings of those mercies which his people have, are better then the whole vintage of the world: And the Lord is therefore a special Saviour to his people, because,

First, They are more precious than the rest of the world: and that cals for most care, which hath most worth. A man takes more care of his jewels, then of the lumber in his house; These are my Jewels, saith God (Mal. 3.) A man carries his jewels about him, or keeps them in a safe cabinet.

Secondly, Neerenesse of relation calls for that care; will not a man perserve his wife, his spouse? The Church is the spouse of Christ. Will not a man preserve his children? if his house be on fire, bring my children out saith he: The heart of God is towards his children, he must provide them a porton. Yea they are his portion, he makes a revenew of them (Deut. 32. 9.) A man will preserve his revenew, that wherein his estate lies: All that God hath on earth (though he hath such a fulnesse in himselfe, that he needs nothing from his Church, yet, al that he hath) he is pleased to say, he hath it from his Church: and therefore God is said to be great in Zion; He is the same great God all the world over, but it appeares not so, what he is, to the men of the world, as to the Saints in Zion it doth: yea he is little in the eye of the world, in comparison of what he is in Zion, therefore he takes great care to preserve his Zion. Lastly observe.

The preserving care of God over man, especially over that man, over his own people, is a perpetuall care. Preservation is a continued act, if God should leave us one moment, and stop providence, creation would be dissolved: This continuance of his care, is eminent towards his Church; Isa. 27. 3. Least any hurt it, I will keep it night and day. Night and day divide all time between them: to do a thing night and day, is to do it continually. Psa. 121. 4. He that keepeth Israel, neither slumbreth no [...] sleepeth; A slumber is lesse than sleepe; but God will not so much as slumber in his thoughts towards us, all his, are waking thoughts. Futher, his love is without intermission, that knowes no stops nor breaches, ther­fore his care is so too. His peoples dangers are without intermis­sion, therefore his preservation is so too. Enemies oppose his peo­ple without intermission, therefore he protects them so too. The Devill goeth about like a roaring lion, he is ever in motion, he [Page 698] goeth about as an Abaddon or Apollyon, the destroyer and devou­rer of men: The care of Christ prompts him to a like vigilancy, He goeth about preserving; his act of preservation runs parralell with that of the enemies opposition: God watches that his peo­ple may have some quiet rest and sleep. As the story reports of Alexander the great, that he told his Souldiers, I watch more Certo scio me plus vigilare quam vos, ut ipsi somnos quietos capere possitis, Arian. l. 8. than any of you all, that you may sometimes have quiet sleepe: his care dispensed with some of their carelessnesse. It is most true of God, he wakes for ever, and he watches for ever, to preserve us, that, we may sleepe in quietnesse and confidence. Solomon re­prooves some secure ones, who are as they, who sleep on the top of the mast (Pro. 23.) But the Saints may sleep (in regard of fear, though not of endeavour) on the top of the mast, while they re­member that both the helm and the winds are in Gods hands. As our spiritual estates, so our temporal are kept (as with a garrison in their degree) by the power of God through faith unto salvation. So much for the title, O thou preserver of men.

Why hast thou set me as a marke against thee, so that I am a bur­den to my selfe.?

Why hast thou set me as a marke against thee?] The word sig­nifies [...] Occurrit ob­viam factus fuit. Quare posuistime contraium tibi, Vulg. In occursum tibi, Pagn. Objectum tibi; Tygur. Offendiculum in quem sem­per impingas Vatab. to meete one, to come the opposite way; Hence some translate this, why hast thou set me contrary to thy selfe? because he that meets another, comes the contrary way, the way opposite to him: Why hast thou put me as an object against thee? or, as an enemy to thee? the object stands directly before us, and we desire to have an enemy right before us. And the word may be taken simply for an enemy, or adversary, who stands opposite to us, both in his actions and designes, and against whom we direct both ours. We render, wherefore hast thou set me as a marke? and that suites the sence of the word fully, because a marke at which a man aimes, is set in direct opposition to him; we levell our at­rowes or bullets at the marke right before us, Job thought him­selfe thus placed, why hast thou set me as a marke to meete with, or intercept thy shot, thy arrowes, thy bullets, thy blowes upon my breast? Wilt thou make the bosome of thy servants, like the breast of an enemy, a But to receive all thy arrows? A mark is as a standing enemy; and an enemy is a moving marke to shoote at: a marke is a livelesse enemy, and an enemy is a living marke: his meaning then is; Thou hast set me against thee, as if I were an enemy, [Page 699] as if I were one, against whom thou resolvest to direct all thine ar­rows, and aim every stroke: so the word is used, Judg. 8. 21. where Zeba and Zalmunna, two Kings taken captive by Gideon, said to him, rise thou and fall upon us; it is this word, set us before thee as a marke for thy victorious sword: So the Prophet (Amos 5. 19.) tels us that a man in hopes to escape the hand of God, shall be as if a man did flee from a Lion, and a Bear met him, such a man is but a mark for a Bear, who thinks to out-runne this Lion. That expression (1 King. 5. 4.) is very clear to this sense, where the peacefulness of Solomons reigne is described, thus, there was nei­ther adversary nor evil occurrent; the word we translate, evill occurrent, it is that in the text, no evil met or befel them. So then the sum of all is, That Job expostulates or complaines be­fore God, that he was as it were, the man chosen out amongst all the men in the world, to be as the mark and But against which God shot his afflictions, and level'd all his arrows: As if he had said; There are many mo about me, and thou doest not so much as touch one of the hairs of their heads, there are men that receive not so much as one shot from thee, but I am made thy standing marke, why is it thus Lord? So he expresseth himself, in other words, but to this very sense, chap. 19. 11. chap 13. 24. Where­fore holdest thou me for thine enemy? or (according to the letter of the Hebrew) among those who straighten thee, as an enemy straightens a City, in the time of a siedge: And this he doth to move God to pity and compassion; Lord, saith he, I am set as a mark against thee. You would be much moved (a tender heart would) to see a man bound fast to a post, and another standing off with his bow bent, and his arrow on the string, with his gun or pi­stoll cockt, aiming at his breast: Job presents himself in such a po­sture, as if the Lord had bound him fast to a post or to a tree, and were pouring vollies of shot, and sending showers of arrows up­on him continually.

Observe, first the manner of the language, which is by way of a vehement question, or expostulation, Why hast thou set me as a marke against thee?

Man is very inquisitive to know the reasons of Gods dealings with him. That's one thing.

And secondly which is near the same,

It is some satisfaction and ease to the mind smitten by the hand of God, to know the reason why he wounds, why he smites. Why [Page 700] hast thou set me as a marke? as if he had said; if I could but learne this, and see the reason of it, surely I should receive thy wounds as kisses, and take thy stroakes as embraces. When Gideon saw so many evils and troubles upon Israel, Jud. 6. and the Angel told him, the Lord was with him, Then, why is it thus (saith he) Can you give me a reason, why God being with us, it is thus with us? To know the reason of our paine, is a great ease, and almost the care of it. If the people of God did but know what infinite reason he hath (reason of the highest temperament of wisdome and good­ness) why he layes affliction upon them, and makes them as his markes, they would be abundantly satisfied with it. What is the reason why the Saints coming out of great affliction, are willing to confesse, it is good for us that we were afflicted, and blessed be God that we were chastned. It is, because then they see more cleerly the reason why God afflicted them, and they then begin to tast the fruit of those afflictions. If while the affliction is upon us, we knew what good God meaneth us, what honour he in­tendeth us, we should beare it, not onely with courage and with patience, but, with joy. If Iob had been but fully acquainted with this, that God therefore set him up as a mark to shoot at, that he might be to all the world a mirror of patience: that God intended him this honour, that his name should be upon record in his Book so long as there was a Church, surely he would have borne all with more patience and ease than he did; But he was groping in the darke, and therefore enquires, wherefore hast thou set me as a marke against thee? The words are not only, or not so much, an expostulation, because he was set as a marke, as an inquisition, why he was set as a marke. Thirdly note,

God sometimes seemes an enemie to his faithfull servants. For one to be before God as a But continually shot at, what other in­terpretation can sense make of it, but this, that God looks upon him as an enemy? Iacob saith of Ioseph (Gen. 49. 23.) the ar­chers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him. Joseph was as the common marke of his Bretherens envy. But in this case, as it is said of Joseph (Gen. 42.) when his brethren came to him, he made himself strange to them. (Joseph strained himselfe, and used his art, to overcome his nature, he made himselfe strange: Joseph was of a meek and loving disposition, and there­fore like a Player upon a stage, he only acted the part of a rigid ma­ster or governor.) Thus many times the Lord takes upon him the [Page 701] posture of an enemy, and forces a frowne upon a poor creature, whom he loves and delights in with all his heart; he makes him as his marke to shoot at, whom he layes next his own heart. Thus the Church speakes, Lam. 3. 12. He hath bent his bow, and set me as a marke for his arrowes; And (Job 16. 13.) that, you may see how his language agrees with other Scriptures; His archers com­passe me round about, he cleaveth my reines asunder, and doth not spare. He poureth out my gall upon the ground. How exactly he speakes! A man shootes at a haires bredth that shootes thus; when God sends his archers, their bowes shoote so true, that they cleave the reines asunder: the reines are in the middest of a man, and to cleave the reines, is to shoot level: as pouring out the gall, or unbowelling, imports to shoot dead.

Fourthly observe this, Why hast thou set me as a mark?

God takes the most eminent and choisest of his servants, for the choicest and most eminent afflictions. He makes a Job the white. Why hast thou chosen me? There was great reason, God should choose him, he was the most eminent in holiness and grace of all about him: he was the most remarkable man for grace and good­ness, therefore he must be the marke. They who have received most grace from God, are able to bear most affliction from God. God doth this in infinite wisdome: as the Apostle, Rom. 14. 11. gives an excellent advice in reference to weake brethren, such as are weak receive, but not to doubtful disputations; take heed how you ingage your weake brethren in doubtfull disputes, you may loose them so; take those that are strong and able, such as have their senses exercised to discern both good and evill, such as are well ballasted for a storme, take these men, if you will, to doubtfull disputations, but doe not take weake brethren. If God will not have us take a weak Christian to a doubtful disputation; surely then, he calls such to sufferings, of whose strengh he is well assured: A man under great affliction, is brought to a very doubt­ful disputation; therefore the Lord will not bring a weak one, one low in grace to it, but he takes out the strong: As the General of an Army chooses out the valiantest and most experienced vete­rane Souldiers, to put them upon hard adventures, it is not wisdom to venture a fresh-water Souldier upon difficult services. God will not put new wine into old bottles: as it is in acting duties, so in sufferings. And as Christ orders the word in such wisdom, that he will not have counsel given, to any soul, who is unprepared to [Page 702] receive it, or unable to bear it. Iohn 16. 12. I have many things yet to say unto you, but you cannot beare them now; therefore I will deferre, until you have got more strength: So God saith of a young Christian, one that is newly come in; thou hast great af­flictions to undergoe before thou dyest, but thou art not fit to beare them yet, I will defer thy triall till thou art grown more hardie, through more communion with me, to fit thee for that encounter. As our Lord Christ told Peter (Joh. 21. 18.) When thou wast young, thou girdest thy self, and walkedst whither thou wouldest; but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whether thou wouldest not. That is, when thou wast young and unexperienced thou enjoyest thy liberty; but when thou shalt be grown older in years, and stronger in grace, thou shalt willingly stretch forth thy hands, and quietly suffer thy self to be bound to the Crosse (Peter was not nailed as Christ, but tied to the Crosse) and there die in witness of my truth; for this Christ spake, signifying by what death he should die and glorifie God, ver. 19.

Fiftly, In that he saith, Why hast thou set me as a marke against thee? Why doest thou run thus against me? Observe,

Man in sinning, runneth contrary to God, and God in affli­cting seemeth to run contrary to man. Every act of sin, is a direct opposition unto God: we set God as a marke, and shoot arrows of disobedience against him; sin is a missing the mark of duty, but it ames to hit the Lord, as a mark, who charges us with that duty. In affliction God runneth upon us, and makes the trangressor his marke. Moses (Levit. 26. 41.) speakes both wayes; If your uncircumcised hearts be humbled, and ye acknowledge that ye have walked contrary unto me, and that I have walked contrary unto you, that I have made you a marke, and shot at you by my judgements, and that you have made me a marke, shooting at me by your sins; then I will remember, &c. So that our sinning is a walking contrary unto God, and Gods corrections are his walking contrary to us: There is an excellent expression, noting how sin strikes, (and as it were) shoots at God (Iob 15. 25, 26.) He stretcheth out his hand against God speaking of a wicked man) and strengtheneth himselfe against the Almighty; (here this word is used) he runneth upon him; even on his neck, upon the thick bosses of his bucklers. See how he describes a wicked man in his natural course; what doth he? he runs upon God, he [Page 703] runneth upon him, even upon his neck; as a man that encounters an enemy, runs upon him, and sets his feet upon his neck; he run­neth upon the thick bosses of his bucklers, a warrier hath bosses upon his arms, both for beauty and defence. The enemy runs upon the very bosses and fears nothing: such is a wicked man He runs against God; wil not God run upon him? He wil certainly be upon the bosses of their bucklers, and upon their necks too, one time or other, till they shall be forced to cry out, that as they have been burdens unto God, so now they are burdens to themselves. Thus Job concludes in his own case.

So that I am a burthen to my self.
[...] Tulit onus à tollendo ac fe­rendo dictum. Sum super te o­nus, [...], alii vertunt [...], ouerosus, molestus quo alluditur ad im­portunos peccato­res, qui auribus Iudicum perstre­punt. [...], tibi, quod scriba mutarunt in [...] mibi, quòd in­dignum divina majestate arbi­trarentur, ut ho­muncio et oneri ess [...]t. Abe Ezr. Drus.

The former words, are the cause, and these the effect. Thou hast set me as a marke; what follows? O, I am a burthen to my selfe! The Septuagint reade thus, so that I am a burthen unto thee, or, so, that I am burdensome to thee. And then his meaning may be conceived thus, Lord thou settest me as a marke, so that I become burthensome unto thee; I have such a weight of afflictions upon me, that I am forced to complainings and expostulations wherein I am afraid, I am burthensome to thee; as poor Suters when they cry long in the ears of a Judge or Magistrate, he saith forbear, you are very troublesome, very burthensome to me.

The Rabbins observe, that this was the ancient reading of the Text, I am a burthen unto thee, and that the Scribes, who wrote out the Bibles in Hebrew, made this alteration, a burthen to my self; because they conceived it was unbecoming the Majestie of God, that Job should say, he was a burthen to him. There is a general truth in that translation, a burthen unto thee; The sins of man are burthensome to God, the frowardness and impati­ence of men, are burthensome unto God: But I conceive our translation carries the sense fairer, in a reflection upon his owne tired spirits, So that I am made a burthen to my selfe, that is, thou dost even throw me upon my self, whereas heretofore thou wast wont to bear me, and take my burthen upon thy self. Alas I faint, I cannot stand under my self, I am weary of my life, be­cause I am left alone to bear it, I know not what to do with my self, I am so burthensome to my self. Hence observe. First,

Outward afflictions, poverty, sickness, want, &c. are bur­thens, and they make a man burthensome to himself. It is a great burthen to have our comforts taken away from us. The removing [Page 704] of comforts lies like a heavy weight upon the spirit: the removing of health from the body is a weight upon the soul; fear is a bur­then, care is a burthen, and so is pain. Therefore God cals us to cast all those burthens upon him, Psal. 55. 22. Secondly, ob­serve,

Man left to himself, is not able to bear himselfe. Man is much borne down by the weight of natural corruption. Hence the Apostle cals it, A weight and the sinne which doth so easily be­set us, (Heb. 12. 1.) or dangle about our heels, to burden us, as long garments do a man that runneth. Our ordinary callings and af­faires, left upon our own backs presse us to the earth, much more do our extraordinary troubles and afflictions. And there­fore he adviseth, Cast thy burthen upon the Lord (he assures in the next words) and he shall sustaine thee. As implying, that man cannot sustaine or beare his owne weight. And though, it should seem we have strengh to spare for others, and are there­fore commanded to bear one anothers burthens, (Gal. 6.) yet no man of himself, no not the holiest Atlas, nor the spirituallest Porter on earth, is able to bear his owne self, unless Christ be his suppor­ter, who is also, therefore, said to uphold all thiags by the word of his power, Heb. 1. 3. Because no creature in a natural, or man in a spiritual capacity can bear his own weight.

Thirdly, From the connexion between these two phrases, Thou hast set me as a marke against thee, so that I am a burthen to my self; what is it that makes my life to be so burthensome to me? It is this, because I am set as a mark before thee, that is, because thou seemest to be an enemy to me: And so the note from the connexion is this.

That which presses and burthens the soule ahove all, is the appre­hension that God is against us. Job in many things looked unto God under these temptations, with sad thoughts, as if he were his enemy: so he express'd himself in the sixth Chapter, The poy­son of his arrows drinks up my spirits, he setteth himselfe in battel array against me. In these temptations and desertions, this was the burden of his spirit, that God appeared as an adversary, Why doest thou set me as a marke against thee? Let the Sabians and the Chaldeans shoot at me as much as they will, let fire and windes contend with me, and make me the marke of their utmost fury; I can beare all these. Job was light hearted enough, when he thought he contended onely with creatures, and that creatures onely [Page 705] contended with him; but in the progresse of this triall he finds God against him, withdrawing comforts from, and shooting ter­rours at him; now he is a burthen to himself, he can beare this no longer. As Caesar said in the Senate (when he had many wounds given him, yet this wounded him most, that he was wounded by the hand of his son) What thou my sonne? So when a believer looks this way and that way, and fees many enemies, Satan and the creatures, all in armes against him; he can beare all their charges and assaults, but if he apprehend God opposing and wounding him, he weepes out this mourneful complaint, What thou my Father? What thou my God? Thou who hast so often shined up­on me, dost thou darken thy face towards me, and appeare mine enemy! These apprehensions of God, will make the strongest Saint on earth, a burden too heavy for himselfe to beare. That which causeth the most burdensome thoughts in the Saints, is the in­evidence of their pardon; Sin unpardon'd is in it self a burden: and our not knowing sin to be pardon'd, is a greater burden: but our jealousies and fears, that it is not pardon'd, is the greatest burden of all, and that which adds weight, yea an intolerableness to all other burdens. Hence Job in the next verse, and with the last breath of his answer, points directly at that which pincht him.

Verse 21. And why doest thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquitie? for now shall I sleep in the dust, and thou shall seek me in the morning, but I shall not be.

In the former verse we found Job humbly confessing his sin, and earnestly enquiring of the Lord a reason of his sorrowes, why he had shot him so full of arrows, that now he was not so much wounded as loaded, And become a burthen to himself.

In this verse he sues for the pardon of those sins, and so for the removal of those sorrows. That the bow might speedily be un­bended, and not a shot more made at his bleeding breast. In the answer of which suite, he desires speed and expedition, lest help being retarded, come too late: for he professeth that he cannot hold out his siedge long, he must needs make his bed in the grave, and then being sought for, he shall not be found.

And why dost thou not pardon my trangressions?

We may consider the words two waies.

In the forme, they are a vehement expostulation. Jobs spirit hath been heated all along with the fire of his sufferings, and here he speakes in the heat of his spirit, and with fiery desires after mer­cie: He keepes up his heart to the same height and tenour still, There it was, Why hast thou set me as a mark against thee? Here's another Why, and why dost thou not pardon my transgression? As before he was grieved to be set up as a mark for afflictions to aime at; so now he desires to be made a marke for mercy to aim at.

I shall note one thing from hence, before I come to open the words; They who are sensible of the evill of sinne, will pray hear­tily for the pardon of sinne. Expostulation is earnest prayer; ex­postulation is a vehement postulation, a vehement enquiring after or desiring of a thing, Why dost thou not pardon my sinne? may be resolved into this, O that thou wouldest pardon my sinne! Or, Wilt thou not pardon my sinne? The matter of this prayer requires such a forme, such a vehemency of spirit in him that prayes. If there be any petition in the world about which the spirit should be fired, it is in this, when wee pray for pardon of sinne.

Will not a man whose body is defiled by falling into the mire, call hastily for some to cleanse and wash him? Will he not say, if it come not speedily, why do ye not bring away the water there, sin is the defiling and bemiring of the soul, and pardon is the clean­sing of it.

If a man be deeply and deadly wounded, will hee have onely some few feeble desires, or make cold requests for a Chyrurgion. Will hee not call and call aloud? Call and call again for helpe and healing? Sins are the wounds of the soul, and pardon is the only cure of it.

If a man hath broken his bones, will he not be very earnest to have them set again? Sin is the breaking of the bones, and pardon is their setting. How doth David cry to the Lord (Psal. 51. 8.) That the bones which he had broken might rejoyce; Sin had broken his bones first, and the hiding of Gods favour from him, was a se­cond breaking.

If a mans peace, or the peace of a Nation be disturbed, is there not earnest crying (as at this day) to have it repaires and re-esta­blished? [Page 707] Sin troubles our peace, the peace of the soul, and the peace of Kingdomes, Sin is the great make-bate, and pardon is the returning of our peace, and quieteth all again, and there­fore no marvel, if we cry out, Why doest thou not pardon our sinnes?

He that is greatly in debt, and fears every hour to be arrested and cast in prison, is trying all friends to get security, and prote­ction. Sinning is a running in debt with God, and it brings us under the danger of his arrest every-moment: forgiveness cancels the bond, when the sin is pardoned, the debt is paid, and the soul discharged; And therefore no wonder if in this case, we hear or make strong cries, Why doest thou not pardon our sinnes. My son (saith Solomon, Prov. 6. 4. speaking about suretiship) if thou be surety for thy friend (if thou hast ingaged thy self for another) Give not sleep to thine eyes, nor slumber to thine eye-lids, deli­ver-thy self as a Roe from the hand of the hunter, and as a bird from the hand of the fowler. Not to give rest to the eye, nor slum­ber to the eye-lids, notes the hottest pursuit and greatest intention of spirit about a business; Thus busie Solomon advises a man to be, who becometh surety for another. Then what should we do, who have contracted huge debts our selves? How should we in this sense give our eyes no rest, and our eye-lids no slumber, till our souls be delivered, as a Roe from the hand of the hunter, and as a bird from the hand of the fowler; that is, from all the power and challenge, which the Law without us, conscience within us, Satan pursuing us, and the justice of God threatning us, can any way make or have against the peace of our souls. That's the first thing from the manner or form in which Job sues for the pardon of sin. His spirit doth not fall, he grows not flat upon this point, but is as high and earnest here, for the pardon of sin, as in any of his requests for the ease of his pained bodie, or the dissolution of it.

Why doest thou not pardon my sinne, and take away mine ini­quity? I shall first shew what is meant by pardoning and taking away; and then, what by transgression and iniquity, and so put the sence of all together.

Why dost thou not pardon my transgression?

The [...]. accipiunt. [...] tanquam à [...] oblitus fuis. Septuagint reads it, Why dost thou not forget my trans­gression? Or bury it in the grave of oblivion: and the word may [Page 708] signifie to forget, as well, as to take away. But generally it im­ports the lifting up or taking away of that which lies heavy upon us, either in a morall or in a natural notion, Hos. 11. 4. I was to them, as they that take off the yoak; And because pardon is the taking away or lifting off of sin, therefore it is often put for the act of pardoning.

Hence also it is applied to that gesture of the Priests, when they [...] Tollere, levare; per Metaphoram donare, cò quòd munera & do­naria in altum elevari solerent, sicut sacrificia cum Deo offere­bantur. received gifts and sacrifices, because they were wont to elevate and lift them up. Hence Christ the substance of all the Sacrifices, is said to be lifted up, himself saith, As Moses lifted up the Ser­pent in the wilderness, so must the Sonne of man be lifted up, (Joh. 3. 14.) we may say, as Aaron lifted up the Sacrifices at the altar, so the Son of man was lifted up. This lifting up, noted also the acceptance of those Sacrifices, and the favour of God to those who brought them. When Pharaoh bestowed a great favour upon his chief Butler, Gen. 43. 30. according to his dream, he lifted up his head: Ioseph expounded so, After three daies Pharaoh shal lift thine head; that is, he shall freely pardon thy offence, and bestow some great honour, gift or reward upon thee. And in this sence it is proper to the text, when sin is pardoned, a mans head is lifted up himself is advanced indeed.

The Lord proclaimes his name in this tenor, (Exod. 34. 7.) The Lord, the Lord, forgiving (or lifting up) iniquity; and Psal. 32. 1. Blessed is the man whose transgression is forgiven or lifted up.

Further, this word signifies, not only, to take or lift off a burthen from another, and lay it down: but so to lift it off from another, as for a man to take it upon himself, and bear it in his stead, from whose shoulders it was taken. And in this strict sence, we are e­specially to understand it in the point of pardon; for pardon is not the taking away of sin from a man, and laying it, none knows where: but sin being taken off from man, some other shoulders are prepared to bear it, even the shoulders of our Lord Christ, on him our sin is laid, All we like sheep have gone astray, we have turned eve­ry one to his own way, and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all, Isa. 53. 6. when the burthen of dept was taken off from us it was charged on Christ. He did not take or lift the burthen of sin from us, and throw it by, but he bare it himself; nothing but this could compleate the work of pardon: therfore it was also prophe­cied, Isa. 53. 4. Surely he hath born our griefs and carried our sor­rows, And (1 Pet. 2. 22.) who his own self bare our sins in his body on [Page 609] the tree; that is, in his humanity or humane nature, while he dwelt with us in the body. Body is not here opposed to Soul, but in­cludes it; as sometime the whole work is laid upon the soul of Christ, not excluding his body, Isa. 53. 10. When thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin. By the whole man this offering was made, and the whole man bare our sins on the tree. That passage, Mat. 8. 17. (where the first prophecie of Isaiah is quoted, is very emphatical) when Christ had heal'd many of their outward di­stempers, this reason is added, That it might be fufilled, which is written (sc. Isa. 53. 9.) himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses. Now Christ took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses, when he took and bare our sins: when he took sin, he took that which was the necessary fruit of sin, our sicknesses and our sorrows; For as in Scripture Christ is said to be made sin for us; that is, with the sin he bare those affiictions and sorrows, which are the consequents of sin; so here, when it is said, He bare our sorrows and our sicknesses, it takes in the bearing of those sins, which procured and produced those sorrows.

The Greek words used by the Evangelist are ful with this sense, [...] assumpsit sccum, atque recepit, quasi ad se transtulit. He took them to him, he received them upon himself; he (as it were) translated them from poor sinful man, to his owne bo­dy.

The word also imports his taking our sins and sicknesses upon him, as a vesture or a garment, and so wrapping himself in them. We know our sins by nature cloath us as a garment, ours, is not only a burden, but a cloathing of sin and filthiness, Take away his filthy garments (saith the Lord concerning Joshua the high-Priest) then follows, and unto him I said, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will cloath thee with change of raiment. Man saw not his own nakedness, till he was cloathed with sinne, Gen. 2. Christ to answer that, cloaths and wraps himself with our sins, as we our selves were wrapped about and cloathed with them; he cloaths himself with our sorrows, as we our selves were cloathed with sorrow. In which sence (among others) Christ may be called a man of sorrows; as we may call a man cloa­thed with raggs, a man of raggs; and a man cloathed with silke, a man of silkes.

The second word of the Evangelist, Mat. 18. 17. signifies to bear [...] as a Porter bears a great burthen; Christ took up that burthen onder which all the Angels in heaven would have sunk, he took [Page 710] it up like a mighty Sampson, and carried it out for us. The scape-Goate was a type of this, Levit. 6. 22. And the Goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities into a land not inhabited; or a land cut off and separated from other lands and people, figuring hereby the total abolishing of our sins, which being carried into a land, where no man dwels, shall be as lost and gone for ever, not to be found when they shall be sought for: who can find that, which is, where no man ever was; pardon'd sin is carried and (as it were) hid out of the sight both of God and man, for it is not; and that which is not, is not (according to man) to be seen. In allusion to all which, Christ (Jo. 1. 29.) is pointed at by the Baptist, with, [...]. Behold the Lumb of God that takes away the sins of the world; he takes sin off from the world, upon himself, and carries it away no man knows whither. That for the first word, pardon, why doest thou not pardon my sin.

The second word is rendred by our Translatours, Take away, [...] Est, 1. simplici­ter praeterire, 2. interire, peri­re, evanescere, mori. why doest thou not take away mine iniquity? Others thus, Why doest thou not cause mine iniquity to pass away? Or, Why doest thou not put away mine iniquity? So we rranslate, 2 Sam. 12. 13. where assoon as David confest his sin, saying, I have sinned, Na­than answers, and the Lord hath put away thy sin; he hath made it to pass away.

The word signifies, first, simply, to pass away or to pass by.

Secondly, to die, perish or vanish away, that which passes by us is vanished, as to us: So the word is taken, Psal. 37. 36. where David speaking of the flourishing estate of wicked men, saith, I have seen the wicked in great prosperity, flourishing as a greene bay tree, yet he past away and loe he was not: A man unpardoned, sees, or should see, his sins growing up as a mighty tree: sin unpardo­ned, flourishes like a green bay-tree, it roots in the soul, and guilt nourishes it; but when pardon comes, sin passes away, and it is not, because, that which gave it sap, is not.

Further, this word (which is very considerable) is applied to Quando dicitur de mandato pa­cto, juramento, significat trans­gredi, violare, peecare. the committing of sin, as well as to the pardoning of sin: For, when it is joyned with those words, The Commandements of God, the Statutes of God, the Word of God, or the like, it signi­fies to violate, to break the bounds, to transgress: for in sinning a man passes by the Word and Commandement of God, the pre­cepts which God hath given, and the charge God hath laid upon him, he goeth away from all; when man sins he passeth by the [Page 711] Commandment of God, and when God pardons, he passeth by the sin of man, or he causeth his sins to pass away.

So that this word, Take away, put away, or cause to passe, Transire facis, e. i. impunitum retir quis, condo­nas. notes the removing of sin, both in the guilt and punishment; When sin is past by, all the punishments due to sin are passed by, the sinner shall never be toucht, or feel the weight of Gods little finger in judgement; when God comes with his revenges, he passes such by, as in that plague of Egypt, the slaying of the first born, which was therefore called the Lords Passeover, in memorial whereof, that great ordinance was appointed the Jews, of keeping the Passeover, and eating the Pascal Lambe, Exod. 12. 13, 14. In this sense the word is used, Amos 7. 8. when God was resolved to punish and charge the sins of that people upon them, he saith, Behold I will set a plumbe-line in the middest of my people, Israel, and what follows? I will not again pass by them any more. God came before, once, and again, armed to destroy them, but when he came, he past by them, he put up his sword, he unbent his bow, he stopped up the vials of his wrath; when a cloud of blood and judgements hung over their heads, he sent a breath of mercy, and caused it to pass over them; but now (saith he) I will not again pass by them any more; that is, I will surely punish them, so the next words interpret, the high places of Isaac shall be dissolate, and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid wast.

Some translate that in Amos, I will not any more dissemble Verbum Ebrai­cum [...] quoties in scrip­turis sanctis ex persona Dei po­nitur pro poena accipiendum est, ut ncqu [...]quam a­pud eos maneat sed pertranseat, Hieron. in A­mos 5. Non ultra dissi­mulabo ei scele­ra tua, Pang. Merc. [...]. your wickedness or your sin; and that carries a fair sense, for when a man pardons or will not punish an offence, he seemes to take no notice of it, for that (properly) is to dissemble a thing; (as simulation is to pretend that which is not, so dissimulation is to take no notice, or not to hold forth that which is;) God passeth by and dissembles the sins of men, in a gracious way when he will not observe or look upon them to question or punish them.

The Greek word (Matth. 26. 39.) answereth this Hebrew, where our Lord Christ ptayeth earnestly about the removal of the cup, Father (saith he) if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me; In the same sense that sin is said to pass away, the cup of Gods displeasure and wrath passes also away, when sin is pardon­ed: therefore Christ prayed thrice, that the cup might pass away from him, that he might not be dealt with as a sinner, but that there might be a course found out to spare him, and save the glory of his fathers justice: Yet (he submits) not my will but thy will be [Page 712] done, if it must not passe away, I am contented it should not passe. Thus far we have seen, what is meant by pardoning and taking away.

A word upon those two terms, transgression, and iniquity (which are the objects on which pardoning mercy workes) Why doest thou not pardon my transgression, and put away mine in­iquity? Trangression and iniquity, are words of great signifi­cancy: for in them all manner of sins, especially sins of a grea­ter stature are comprehended.

The former transgression, notes a violation of the Commands [...] Propriè rebellio peccatum ex su­perbia. Non simplex & qua­liscun (que) sed malitiosa & teme­raria transgre­ssio. of God with a high hand, or a rebellion of the mind, when pride of spirit shews it self very much. There is a spice of pride in every sin: Because of pride (saith Solomon) cometh contention; all the con­tentions we maintain against the word and will of God, rise from the pride of our own hearts, because we cannot submit to the will of God; but in some sins, pride holds up her head more proudly. Such sins this word notes, it is not (simply) any sin, but sin very proudly and rebelliously committed.

The latter word Iniquity, imports the crookedness and inequa­lity [...] Incurvationem, declinationem à recta via & ad animum tran­slata, significat per versitatem & melitiam. Curvi mores. of a thing; when it turns this way or that way, and extends not in a straite and right line. Hence it is applyed to the vitiosity and perverseness, to the crookedness and inequality of mans na­ture. Our nature is a crooked peece, and that makes all the croo­kedness in our lives. The Latines speak so, in a moral sence, they call ill manners, and ill manner'd men, crooked men, and crooked manners. David, Psal. 51. 5. bewaileth his birth sin under this notion, I was born in iniquity: And he that was first borne in the world, applied this word to himself, saying; my iniquity (the Peccata denotat quae fiunt ex [...], & destinata ma­litia seu proposi­to, cum sc. mens videt quod aequū est, & tamen in­dulgens cupidi­tatibus sequitur deteriora. Mol­ler. in Psal. 106 6. perverseness, the crookedness of my waies) is greater than can be forgiven, or made straight, Gen. 4. 13. So that this word also (take it strictly) implies more than a bare act of sin, arising from infirmity, weakness or inanimad vertency; it rather notes those sins which are committed from a crooked purpose, from an ill or false bent of the heart: when the mind sees that which is right and good, just and straite, and yet turns to crooked paths, and fol­lows that which is perverse and worse.

Take one thing further. This word in Scripture, signifies not on­ly the act of such sins; but secondly the punishment of them, Psal. 31. 10. Gen. 19. 15. And thirdly, it is put for the means of expia­tion or pardon, Hos. 4. 8. They eat up the sin of my people, and they [Page 713] set their heart on their iniquity. But how did the Priests eat up the sin, and set their hearts on the iniquity of the people? Sin can make us but a hungry banquet. The text bears variety of interpretati­ons. But to the point in hand, sin is here put for the sacrifices of­fered up for sin, out of divers of which, the Priests had a portion for themselves to eat; so that the Prophet here describes the hor­rible prophaneness of those degenerate Priests, who set their hearts upon the sacrifices, because themselves were fed by them, not because the people came to seek the favour of God, and make their peace by them, when they had sinned. As Physitians may be said to eat the diseases of the people, and set their hearts upon their sicknesses, when they (because their own gain is in it) are pleased to hear of spreading sicknesses, &c. Or as Lawyers, eat the contentions and quarrels of the people, when they are glad to hear of Suits, &c. because they grow rich by it. So those base-spirited Priests were said to eat the sins of the People, and set their hearts on their iniquities, because they were glad to have of a mul­titude of sacrifices, their provisions being inlarg'd by them. So that then, iniquity is the sacrifice for iniquity, in which sense also Christ is said to be made sin for us, namely, a sacrifice for sin, 1 Cor. 5. 21.

From the words thus opened, we may observe;

First, to whom Job addresseth himself for pardon: is it not un­to God? And why doest not thou pardon my transgression?

God onely can, pardon sin. Pardon is his act, his proper and pecu­liar act, he can do it, and none can, but he. We read it among his royal Titles (Exod. 34. 7.) the Name of God is proclaimed in this stile, The Lord, the Lord God, mercifull and gratious, long suffer­ing, and abundant in goodness and in truth, keeping mercy for thou­sands, forgiving iniquity, transgression an sin. Pardoning sin, is put the last of those seven attributes, in which the Lord manifested himself to Moses, as being that, wherein all the former are summ'd up, and into which they conveigh their several blessings, to make man compleatly blessed; or to shew that none can be a pardoner of sin, but he who is vested with all those foregoing glorious titles, and therefore none, but God alone. Hence the Prophet Micah (chap. 7. ver. 18.) puts the question, and challenges all the world; Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity? Shew me one if you can, there is no sin-pardoning God besides thee. Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning? As if the Prophet had said, some will be, or have been offering at this work, but they all have been, [Page 714] or will be found meere bunglers at this work. None can pardon as thou dost. None can pardon, 1. So freely. 2. None so fully, 3. None so continually, 4. None eternally, 5. None so indifferently, whe­ther in respect of sinners or sins, as thou doest. It is all one to thee, what the sins are, and all one to thee, whose the sins are, so they come to ask thy pardon. And that which is a disadvantage to ask pardon of man, is an encouragement to ask it of God, the greatness of our sins. The Psalmist did, and any man may make that his plea, Lord pardon my sin, for it is great. Dare any be a competitor with God in this work? The Pharisees put the que­stion right, if they had not mistook the person to whom they put it, Mark 2. 7. Who is this that forgiveth sins? none can forgive sin but God alone. Again sin (in one sense) is committed onely against God, and for that reason also, God onely is the pardoner of it: Psal. 51. Against thee onely have I sinned. Onely the credi­tor can remit the debt, and he the offence, to whom we have done the wrong. God is wron [...]d in all sins chiefly, and the wrong is so much his, that it may well be called only his, therefore without him no pardon.

But man is charged to forgive his brother: Luke 17. 4. Forgive thy brother seven times; and Christ hath taught us to pray for the forgiveness of our trespasses, as we forgive those that trespass a­gainst us, Mat. 6. 12.

I answer, there are two things in all second-able sins; First, disobedience against God; Secondly injury to man; That which man can, or is required to forgive, and be a pardoner of, is only the injury done unto himself, so as not to revenge it; he cannot take off the sin against God, or stay him from taking vengeance.

But other Scriptures speak of a power committed to man, to re­mit and forgive sin, John 20. 23. Whose sins ye remit are remitted, and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained.

I answer, This power is not authoritative and magisterial, but ministerial and declarative. God hath set up such an institution, that man should pardon man, because many men, yea most men are not competent judges of their own estates, whether they be fit for pardon or no: Many wicked men, would remit and loosen themselves when as their sins are to be retained; they see not their sins, as another man may and doth see them: The Apostle Peter could say to Simon Magus, Acts 8. 23. I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity; Simon [Page 715] Magus did not perceive it, he did not know his own condition, he flatter'd himself, and thought all well, because lately sprinckled with the water of Baptisme; therefore some must declare these men bound, and hold them still under sin.

Again, There are others, whose hearts are upright and sincere, such as are indeed reconciled to God, and all whose sins are pardo­ned; but they are not able to make it out, and they cannot clear up this thing from the word to their own hearts: therefore they need a helper, to declare them pardoned, for they cannot speak or declare it to their own souls: in such cases, both for the conviction of presuming sinners, and the help of upright-hearted, yet weak and doubting Christians, God hath left this power with his Ministers, whose sins ye remit they are remitted, and whose sins ye retain are re­tained. As in the case of leprosie, Lev. 15. The Leper was brought to the Priest, and set before him as a Judge in that point; many were not competent Judges of their own diseases, they could not resolve it, whether they had the leprosie or no; some perceiving a scab or a sore rising upon them, thought (presently) it was the leprosie, when indeed, it was not, and so wronged themselves; Others who were indeed infected, would not be perswaded that they were, therefore the Priests office was, to determine these cases, to bind and restrain, to loosen and let them go, as he saw cause: In which ceremonial practice, we have the shadow of this Gospel practise, in the power of remitting or retaining, of binding or of loosing sin, according to the various conditions of men. Yet all this while God keepeth the great work in his own hand, he is the pardoner, and therefore Job (as the whole tenour of the Scripture rules it) made his address to him, why doest not thou pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity?

Secondly, From these expressions about the pardon of sin, we may learn what the pardon of sin is; Pardon of sin, is the removing or the lifting off, the passing away of sin from the sinner; that pro­perly is pardon of sin. Scripture language is very various and copious about this thing, and yet all runs into this general; I shall instance some of them.

First, Pardon is often expressed by a Metaphor from paying of a debt, 1 Joh. 2. 12. I write unto you little Children, because [...]. your sins are forgiven you; the word notes, your sins are paid, your debts are satisfied; the same word the Apostle useth, Rom. 8. 32. in reference to the sufferings of Christ, God spared not [Page 716] his Sonne; He did not spare him the debt, that is, he neither for­gave the whole, nor compounded with him to take half, or a part, and remit the rest; no, he made him pay all fully down. So, to be pardoned, notes the sparing of the debt, letting the debt pass, with­out calling us to account about it.

Secondly, Pardon of sin, is the remooving it out of sight (Isa. 38. 17.) Thou hast cast all my sins behind thy back, saith Heze­kiah, that is, thou hast put them out of thy sight. As when man is said, to cast the Word of God behind him, Psal. 50. 17. or behind his back, Neh. 9. 26. The meaning is, he regards it not, at all to obey it; so when God casts the sin of man behind his back, the meaning is, he will not regard or see it all, to punish it. That phrase used by the Prophet Micah, is of the same importance, though of a deeper sence, chap. 7. 19. Thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea. Who can live thither to fetch them up? But, may they not rise up or swim, out of themselvs? Surely no; our sins are not cork or wood, but they are iron or lead, they are like stone, or like a mil-stone. To shew how irrecoverably the Egyptians were destroyed in the red-Sea, it is said, they sank like lead in those mighty waters (Exod. 15 10.) and to shew how irrecoverably Babylon shall be destroyed, the holy Ghost saith, that, Babylon shall be like a great mil-stone cast into the Sea by a mighty Angel (Rev. 18. 21.) The casting of a stone, iron, or lead into the sea, Phocenses fer­ream mass [...]m in mare demerse­runt, & jura­runt non prius sc in Pho [...]aean re­versuros, quam hac massa è fun­do maris emer­gerit, at (que) in summa aqua ex­taret, Herod. l. 1. b Montanus ex iib. Mifna cap. de phase. was anciently the Emblem of e­verlasting forgetfulness, or of a resolution, never to recal that which was resolved. † A learned Hebrician observes, that it was a custome among the Jewes, to take those things which they abomina­ted as filthy and unclean, and cast them into the sea; which act, noted either the purging of them, or the overwhelming them out of sight for ever: And a like usage is noted by Iosephus Aeo­sta, l. 5. de Hi­storia Natur & Moral. Novi orbis. a reporter of the man­ners of the Americans, that those barbarous people either descipher­ing some wicked thing upon a stone, or making a symbole or sign of it, used to throw it into a river which should carry it down into the sea, never to be remembred.

Thirdly, Pardon of sin, is noted by washing and purging, to shew that the filthiness of it, is removed from us, Psal. 51. 2.

Fourthly, By covering, Psal. 32. 1. and by not imputing, ver. 2.

Fifthly, By blotting out, Isa. 43. 25. and blotting out as a thick cloud, Isa. 44. 22. All these notions of pardon concurre in this one, that sin passes away, is lifted up and taken off from the Conscience of the sinner, when it is pardoned: The summe of all which is [Page 717] read in that one text, Jer. 50. 20. In those daies, and in that time, saith the Lord, the iniquity of Israel shall be sought for, and there shall be none, &c. (why?) For I will pardon them, whom I re­serve. So that pardoned sin, in God's account is no sin; and the pardoned sinner, is as if he had never sinned: Forgiveness destroys sin; as forgiving a debt destroyes the debt, and cancelling a Bond, destroyes the Bond. Thirdly observe,

When sin is pardoned, the punishment of sin is pardoned. Both words signifie both the punishment, and the sin; and Job having complain'd that he was set up as a mark, and wounded by sharp afflictions, now seeks ease in the surest and speediest way, the pardon of sin, why doest not thou pardon my transgression, &c.

There are three things in sin; The inward matter, the foul evil, the stock, the root of sin, which is natural corruption dwel­ling in us, and flowing out by actions. Secondly, The defilement and pollution of sin: Thirdly, The guilt; when we say sin is par­doned or taken away, it is not in the former (though in pardoned persons corruption is mortified, and the actings of it abated) but in the latter, the guilt is taken away, which is the Obligation to punishment, and so the punishment is taken away too; nothing vindictive or satisfactory to the justice of God, shall ever be laid upon that soul, whose sin is pardoned: Hence Isa. 33. 24. the Pro­phet fore-shewing, how happy a pardoned people shall be, assures them; The inhabitant shall n [...] say, I am sick, the people that dwell therein, shall he forgiven their iniq [...]ty; When iniquity is forgiven, our infirmity is cured: When the soul is healed, the body shall be recovered, Both the body natural, and the body po­litick. Plague, and sword, and famine, and death, all these evils go away, when sin goes; Judgments are nothing else but unpar­doned sins; sin unpardoned, is the root which giveth sap and life to all the Troubles which are upon man or Nation: And as sin committed, is every judgment radically, that is, there is a fitness in sin to produce and bring forth any evil upon man; so pardon of sin is every Mercy radically; when you have pardon, from thence every other particular Mercy springs; you may cut out any blessing, any comfort out of the pardon of sin; particular Mer­cies are but pardon of sin specificated or individuated, brought in­to this or that particular Mercy; of all blessings you may say, this is pardon of sin, that's pardon of sin, and t'other is pardon of sin. Forgiveness destroyeth that wherein the strength of sin lies, it [Page 718] destroyeth our guilt, and to us abolisheth the condemning power of the Law: in these the strength of sin lies. Hence when the peo­ple of Israel had committed that great sin in making the golden Calf, the first thing Moses did, was, to pray for the pardon of sin, and he did it with a strange kind of Rhetoricke, Exod. 32. 32. Oh, this people have sinned a great sin, and have made them gods of Gold. And now if thou wilt forgive their sin; what then Mo­ses? There's no more said; Moses is silent in the rest, it is an im­perfect speech: a pause made by holy passion, not the fulness of the Sentence. Such are often used in Scripture, as Luk. 13. 9. And if it bear fruit, what then? Our own thoughts are left to supply the event: Our translaters add, well. The Greek translators sup­ply that in Exodus, thus; If thou wilt forgive them their sin, forgive them: We may supply it with the word in Luke, If thou wilt for­give them, well. As if Moses had said, Lord forgive them, and then though they have done very ill, yet, I know it will be very well with them; God cannot with-hold any mercy, where he hath granted pardon, for that with the antecedents and requisites of it, is every mercy. Moses knew what would follow well enough if they were pardoned, and what if they were not: therefore he adds; And if not, blot me I pray thee out of thy book which thou hast written: If their sins must stand upon record, Moses would not; he knew, if they were an unpardoned people, they were an undone people, all miseries would quickly break in upon, yea, overwhelm them, and he desired not to out-live the prosperity of that people. If Israel must bear their sins, they must also bear the wrath of God, and if their sin be but taken off, then his love is settled on them: God gives quailes sometime, but he never gives pardons in anger. Fourthly observe,

The greatest sins fall within the compass of Gods pardoning mercy. The words in the text are of the highest signification. Job speaks not in a diminutive language, he is willing to lay load upon himself; they whose hearts are upright will not stand min­cing the matter, and say they have sins, but theirs are small ones, sins not grown to the stature of other mens. As the sins of a godly man, may be very great sins, so (when they are) he acknowledges that they are. I know not where to set the bounds, in regard of the nature or quantity of sin; what sin is there wch a wicked man com­mits, but a godly man (possibly) may commit it, excepting that a­gainst the holy Ghost? These Job did, and the Saints may put to God [Page 719] in confession: and as he did not, so they need not be discouraged to ask pardon for them, because they are great. The grace of the Gos­pel is as large as any evil of sin, the Law can charge us with. The grace of the Gospel is as large as the curse of the Law; what­soever the Law can call or shew to be a sin, the Gospel can shew a pardon for it; whatever the Law can bind us with, the Gospel can unloose. The Mercy-seat covered the whole Ark; The Mercy-seat noted the forgiveness of sin; and if you read the description of it (Exod. 25.) you shall find that it was exactly, to a hairs breadth, of the same dimensions with the Ark, wherein the Law was put: intimating, that there was mercy and pardon for sin, let it come out of any part of the Law laid up in that Ark. As the least sins must of necessity have a pardon, so the greatest sins are in a possibility of pardon: And the truth is, there is no sin, as it is an Anomy, a transgression of the Law, without the compass of par­don. It is not the malignity of the sin, but the malignity of the sin­ner, that makes it incurable; the sin against the holy Ghost is not unpardonable, because there wants mercy large enough to pardon it, but because it refuseth the mercy which should pardon it, and the medicine that should heal it.

Fifthly, Observe, who it is that here presseth thus for pardon; it is Job, and was Job never pardoned till now? Or was this, (think you) the first time that ever Job prayed for pardon? Had not Job thought of this business before? Without question he had; he was one of whom God gave this testimony, that he was a just and an upright man, one that feared God and eschewed evil; He that did all this, and was all this, must first be in favour with God, and yet Job cryeth out, Why dost thou not pardon my transgression? Whence observe,

They whose sins are pardoned, must yet pray for the pardon of sin: Yea, they who, upon good grounds, have assurance, that their sins are pardoned, must yet pray for the pardon of their sins, 2 Sam. 12. 13. When Nathan told David, God hath put away thy sin; he assured him that he was pardoned, and doubtless the heart of David open­ed by Faith to let in that gracious Message; he was not faithless, but believing. Yet David in his penitential Psalm penned after­ward, prayes, (O how earnestly!) for pardon, again and a­gain? That which a man is assured he hath, he may pray to have and enjoy: make it so high, which some make the grand objecti­on against this point. Why should we pray (say they) for that [Page 720] which we have already: I say, a man may pray for that, which he hath already, and is assured he hath. Christ himself was assured of the love of his Father, and that his Father would stick to him for ever, and he knew God was neer unto him, yet he cries (Mat. 27. 46.) My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Which Question may be resolved into this Petition, My God, my God, do not forsake me. When David had received a Message by the Prophet concerning a great temporal Mercy, the establishing of his house, that, God would settle him and his Posterity in the Throne for ever; the text saith (2 Sam. 7. 15.) he presently went in, and sate before the Lord, and there makes a most earnest Prayer; and what is it about? He prayeth that God would settle and establish his Kingdom, vers. 25, 26. And now, O Lord God, the thing which thou hast spoken concerning thy Servant, and con­cerning his house, establish it for ever, and do as thou hast said, &c. and let the house of thy Servant David be established before thee.

Might not the Lord answer (according to this Objection) why doest thou trouble me about this? Did not I send thee a Message even now, that I would establish thy Kingdom? Dost thou think I have forgotten my Promise, or will be unfaithful to it? We find not David thus chidden for praying thus. Nay at v. 27. you shall see how David makes this the very ground of his prayer, Lord (saith he) thou hast revealed to thy servant, saying, I will build thee an house, therefore hath thy servant found in his heart to pray this prayer unto thee, &c. Even because thou hast revealed this unto me, that thou wilt build me an house, therefore upon this very ground I make this prayer, that thou wouldest build it. And to shew, that he was full of Faith, the thing should be done, be­fore he prayed it might be done, he adds, v. 28. Thou art that God, and thy words be true, and thou hast promised this goodness unto thy servant. Now therefore let it please thee, to bless the house of thy servant. No man could be fuller of Assurance, or fuller of Prayer than David was. Likewise Christ knew and was assured, that his sheepe, his elect people, should continue for ever, and that none should be able to take them out of his hand, yet how abundantly doth he pour forth his Spirit in prayer about these things, Joh. 17. Again, Christ was assured he should be delivered and upheld in death, Yet in the daies of his flesh he offered up prayers and suppli­cations with strong cries and tears to him that was able to save [Page 721] him from death, and he was heard in what he feared, Heb. 5. 7. He was not afraid of the event, whether he should hold out and pre­vail or no, whether he should conquer and obtain the victory or no, he doubted not the success of this war, though it were with principalities and powers; His fear was only a natural passion, which he took upon him, when he took our nature upon him. He was certain of the issue, and knew he should carry the work through a­gainst all the armies of hell, he would never have undertaken it else: yet he prayeth with strong cries, that he might be strengthened. So then, it is no argument, because a Believer knoweth his sin is pardoned, that therefore he should not pray for pardon; for many things, of which there was clear and certain evidence, that they were, or should be, have been prayed about; it is our duty, for it hath been the practise, both of Christ, and of his people to pray in such a state.

Further we may Answer: Matters of Faith are of Two sorts:

First, Such as are fully accomplished, acted and compleated in all the parts and circumstances of them: for, and about such things, we are not to pray. No man is to pray for the Redemption of the World, for that is a thing past, and yet it is a matter of Faith: But the pardon of sin, though it be compleat in it self, and a matter of Faith to us, yet it is compleating and perfecting every day more and more. Pardon is given us, yet we feel not all, which pardon gives. It is a setled act on Gods part, yet it is in motion on ours; that is, in a perfective motion. Therefore, though we are assured that our sins are pardoned, and shall stand pardoned for ever, yet we may pray about the pardon of them.

Thirdly, Suppose a man know his sins are pardoned, yet he may pray to know it more, and that his evidences may be made yet clearer to him; for though sin cannot be more pardoned in respect of God at one time, than at another; yet in regard of man it may. He apprehends the pardon of his sin more now, than before, and may hereafter apprehend it more, than now: And it is worth the while to bestow pains in prayer for pardon, to have the pardon a little more inlightned: The degrees of any grace or favour, as well as the matter and substance of them, are worthy all our seek­ings and most serious enquiries at the throne of Grace.

Fourthly, He that hath assurance of the pardon of sin, is to pray for the pardon of sin, because he continueth still to sin: And though [Page 722] it be a truth, that sin uncommitted is pardoned in the decree and purpose of God, yet we must not walk by the decrees of God, but by his commandements and rules. His decree pardons sin from all eternity; but his rule is, that we should pray for pardon every day, as we pray for the bread we eat every day, Matth. 6. 11, 12. We must not say, God hath pardoned all sin at once, therefore no matter to ask it again: or I have once had the sight of pardon, and therefore the sight of sin, shall never trouble me; seeing we are directed to search our hearts for sin, and to seek to God for par­don continually. So long as we sin it becomes us to be suitors for the pardon of sin. He that hath ceased to sin, may cease to ask the forgiveness of sin, till then, I know neither rule nor promise, that gives a dispensation for this duty.

To close this point, there are two Cases wherein believers are e­specially to renew their suits about the pardon of sin.

First, (which though it be lamentable, yet it is possible) in the case of falling into scandalous and gross sins: These not only weaken assurance, and be-night the soul, but exceedingly disho­nour God, and grieve the holy Ghost. This caused David to pray and cry for the pardon and purging of his sin, as freshly and as strongly, as if he had never received a pardon, or any evidence of Gods love (of which yet he had great store) before that day, Ps. 51.

Secondly, In times of great troubles and trials, whether per­sonal or National, the Saints re-inforce prayer about pardon: This was Jobs case, his personal afflictions occasion'd him to begg the remission of sins; and not only remission for sins, then com­mitted, but for all the sins, he had committed either before or af­ter Conversion. Even our formerly pardon'd sins, need pardon, when we loose the sight of pardon, and when the soul hath no vi­sions, but visions of terrour, it must seek visions of peace, in the free-grace of God, renewing and sealing pardon in the bloud of Jesus Christ.

Job having thus breathed his spirit in arguings, complaints, and prayers, moves the Lord, for a speedy end and gracious answer: otherwise he sees no way, but he must breath back his spirit into the hands of the Lord who gave it, and lay his body in the dust, from whence it was taken.

[Page 723]

For now shall I sleep in the dust, and thou shalt seek me in the morning, but I shall not be.

Now shall I sleep in the dust.

What he means by this sleep, hath been handled, (Chap. 3. [...] Propriè est cu­bare, hinc mor­tui [...] vocantur, ut e­tiam [...]. 13.) where it was shewed that death is called a sleep, why, and in what manner, death is a sleep. The word here translated, to sleep, signifies properly to lie down: but the sence is the same, be­cause men lie down, when they compose and fit themselves to sleep. And the dead are called down-lyers, as well as sleepers in the Hebrew. The Septuagint reads it, now shall I go to the earth. David speaks near this language, Psal. 22. 15. Thou hast brought me to the dust of death.

Observe hence, whether we are travelling, and where we must take up a lodging for our bodies, ere long. They whose heads are highest, they who lie in beds of Ivory, must lie down in a bed of earth, and rest their heads upon a pillow of dust. Most sleep in the dust, while they live, but all must sleep in the dust, when they die; Earthly men have earthly minds, and they cannot rest, but in earth, for it is their Center. Onely he who hath laid up his heart in Heaven, can comfortably think of laying down his head in the dust.

Further, it is remarkable in how pleasing a notion Job speaks of death, when his life was most unpleasant to him. He com­plained of restless nights in the third, fourth, thirteenth, and fourteenth verses of this Chapter: yet he could think of a time, when he should lie quietly in his bed, and not have so much as a waking moment, or a distracting dream. And when he was once gone to this bed, the curtains of darkness being close drawn a­bout him, he should open his eyes no more, till the eye-lids of that eternity-morning opened, therefore he concludes;

Thou shalt seek me in the morning, (sc. of time) but I shall not be.

In the Hebrew, Thou shalt seek me in the morning, is but one [...] Si dilucula veris me, ficto verbo. word. And some cut out a latine word fit to serve it. We may Eng­lish it strictly to the letter▪ If thou morning me, that is, if thou commest to seek me (as the force of this word hath been for­merly given) with never so much diligence and care, I shall not be found, thou wilt not have Job alive upon the earth to bestow thy mercies upon, For

[Page 724] I shall not be.

The Hebrew is, And not I, that is, I shall not be alive, I shall [...] Non ego, subau­di sum, vel ero. Cum jam in isto not be to be had, he means a non-existence, not, a non-essence: a being he should have, but he should not appear to be. It is as if he had said, Lord I shall not be a Subject capable of outward deli­verances and bodily comforts, unless they come speedily, Lord if thou wilt give me any help, give it, for death hastens upon me, as if it hoped, to be too nimble for, or, to out-run thy succours.

Mr. Broughtons translation seems to intend another sence, pulvere decum­bam? aut quid non tempesti ivè requisivisti me, ut non essem. Jun. which others of the learned Hebricians favour too. He renders the latter part of the verse thus, Whereas I lie now in the dust (refer­ring it to his present condition; I am now lying in the dust, to be pitied of the keeper of men, so he himself expounds, Lord I lie in the dust, a pitiful object, then) Why doest thou not quickly seek me out, that I should no more be, which he interprets, I would by a quick death be rid from these pains. As if in these words Job had again renewed his former desire of death; concerning which, many things have been spoken from preceding passages of his reply, and I will not double upon them here.

But I take the former reading and meaning of the words, as most proper to the coherence, & conclusion of Jobs discourse: and so they are but a repetition or re-inforcement of what he spake at the 7, and 8. verses: There he said, O remember that my life is wind, mine eye shall no more see good, the eye of him that hath seen me shall see me no more, Thine eyes are upon me, and I am not. Here he speaks the same thing in some variety of words, Thou shalt seek me in the morning, and I shall not be. The severity of my sickness threatens to prevent thy earliest preparations for my relief.

Thus (through the strength of Christ) some discoveries have been made about this first congresse, or charge between Eliphaz and Job. But Job hath not yet done; Behold a second and a third Combatant, ready to enter the list against him; And when these three have once tryed their skill and strength upon him, they all three charge him a fresh, a second time, and two of them, a third: Was ever poor soul held so hard to it, as he! How much doth the life of grace make him exceed man, when he (as a man) could scarce be reckon'd among the living? Truth and grace will triumpth and prevail, notwithstanding all the disadvantages of flesh & nature. Is it not strange, that a man should not be weary [Page 725] with arguing, while he often professes he was wearied with living? That while he could scarce fetch his breath for pain, he should do so much work (in a manner) without a breathing. For, as the Messengers of his troubles gave him no rest; But while one was yet speaking, there came another also and said, &c. And while a se­cond was yet speaking, a third came and said, &c. So neither did these disputants about his troubles. While Eliphaz and Job were yet speaking, Bildad answered and said, &c. While Bildad and Job were yet speaking, Zophar answered and said. What E­liphaz said, and Job answered in this first undertaking, you have heard: The opening of what Bildad had to say, and Job to answer, waits (till the Lord shall be pleased to vouch­safe it) a further opportunity. What is now (as himself hath pleased to enable his unworthy in­strument) offered, waits upon him for his blessing. To him all blessing is for ever due; on him let praises ever waite, for all his blessings. Amen.

FINIS.

A TABLE, Directing to some special Points noted in the precedent Expositions.

A
  • ADvancement is from God, pag. 267. The difference between Gods advancing his own People and ene­mies, pag. 270
  • Afflictions. Sore afflictions in­dispose for duty, p. 15. Affliction often disturbs the seat of reason, p. 17. Times of affliction, special seasons for the use of our graces, p. 23. Affliction discovers our hearts, and our graces to our selves, p. 28, 29. Afflictions good for the Saints, p. 115. They are but trials, 116. Affliction is a cleanser, how? p. 117. They are sent to humble us, ib. To bring the Saints nearer God, p. 118. Man naturally seeks the reason of his afflictions out of himself, p. 220. Every affliction hath a cause, pa. 221. It comes not by the power of any creature, ib. It is from the Lord, p. 222. It is our wisedome and our duty to seek God in times of affliction, p. 230. We are to seek him about foure things in affliction, ib. It is a great ease to the soul to do so, p. 231. Affli­ction and happiness meet in the same person, p. 309, 310, 312. Yet every one that is afflicted is not happy, p. 313. The best of Gods children, sometimes entertain af­flictions unwillingly, p. 321. They sometime apprehend them as un­useful, p. 323. As disgraceful, p. 324. The least affliction ought not to be sleighted, p. 324, 325. We ought highly to prize them, 326. Afflictions of others are to be throughly weighed, and wherein that consists, pag. 315. It is an [Page] addition to a mans affliction, when others are not sensible of it, pag. 416. Afflictions are heavy bur­dens, p. 420. They come by multi­tudes, 433. Afflictions are the higher services of grace, p. 487. They are measured out by the hand of God, 589. Man apt to think he needs not so many or so great Afflictions, p. 630, 631. It makes a little time seem very long to us, 643. Affliction is the magnify­ing of a man two wayes, p. 659, 660. Why called visitations? 665. They are tryals, 668, 669. They are bands, and such as man cannot break, 674. It is a great ease to an afflicted mind, to know the reason why afflictions are sent, p. 699, 703. God brings his emi­nentest servants to the most emi­nent tryals by afflictions, pag. 701.
  • Angels are the servants of God, p. 129. Their several services for the Church, 129, 130. And a­gainst the wicked, 131. Angels how chargeable with folly, p. 135. Pride and self-confidence, the sins of Angels, p. 138. Angels as crea­tures mutable, ib. Yet now confir­med by Christ, 139. God hath no need of Angels, p. 141.
  • Answering, how taken in Scrip­ture, p. 409. It is the duty of a man, to answer when he is que­stioned or charged with any fault, ibid.
  • Application of general truth very necessary, p. 403.
  • Arrows, how taken in Scrip­ture, p. 425. Arrowes of God why so called, p. 427. Afflictions like arrowes in four things, ib. 428. Poyson'd arrowes, p. 429.
  • Assurance, To be assured of a mercy, is better than the enjoyment of a mercy, p. 383.
B
  • BEasts, in what sence put for men in Scripture, pag. 368. Beasts of the earth, hurtful to us three wayes, p. 369. Beasts how at peace with us, p. 378. Sin hath made the beasts and all creatures hurtful to man, 379. It is from special providence that the beasts hurt us not, 380. Beasts com­plain not without cause, p. 440. Man in passion worse than beasts, p. 628, 630.
  • Behold, a note either of deri­sion, or of asseveration, p. 8.
  • Belial, wicked men, why called sons of Belial? p. 47.
  • Blast and breath of God, what they signifie in Scripture, p. 55, 56.
  • Blessednesse, three degrees of it, p. 384.
  • Body of man compared to a house, in two respects, p. 145. Why called a house of clay? 146. How it should humble us, 147, 148. Much care of the body, is usually joyned with neglect of the soul, p. 148.
  • Bread the staffe of life, p. 345. It is a pretious comfort, to have [Page] bread in a promise, when we have none upon the board, p. 347.
  • Brethren, many sorts of them, p. 497. Brethren deceitful, 499. The deceit of a brother, is double deceit, especially of a brother in the faith, ib.
  • Burial, A comely burial is an honour and a blessing, p. 394.
C
  • CHarity, Four acts of spiritual charity, p. 8. Spiritual chari­ty best, p. 13, 14. Charity, especial­ly spiritual charity is open handed, p. 14.
  • Chastnings, see Afflictions. What is properly a chastning, p. 326. How we may improve this notion, that Shaddai God Almigh­ty chastens us, p. 329.
  • Children of wicked parents, of­ten wrapt up in the same judge­ment with their parents, p. 200.
  • Children of godly parents nearest the blessing, p. 389. Blessings upon children are the parents blessings, p. 390.
  • Chirurgion, Three necessary qualifications for him, either in a natural or mystical sence, p. 337.
  • Christ confirmed the good An­gels, p. 139. No stability in any estate out of Christ, ib. Christ is not onely a principle, but a pattern of holiness, 175. Faith can live upon nothing but Christ, p. 487.
  • Cloud, what, p. 613. Dying man like a cloud, ib.
  • Commendations with a But, wound, p. 17.
  • Committing our cause to God, what it imports, p. 228. Commit­ting our cause to God, a great ease to the soul, 231. A caution a­bout committing our cause to God, p. 232.
  • Complaining, when sinful, 622.
  • Concealing the word of God sin­ful, four wayes of concealing it, p. 462, 463.
  • Confession of sin: a general confession may be a sound one, p. 679. Divers ingredients of it, p. 680. The holiest have cause to confesse sin, and why? p. 682. Sin not confessed, gets strength three mayes, p. 683. It makes the soul very active about the reme­dies of sin, p. 684.
  • Confidence, Holy confidence what it is, p. 21. Confidence in God, settles the heart in all condi­tions, p. 30.
  • Conscience, the testimony of it, the best ground of willingness to die, p. 465.
  • Correction, what it is, p. 313. The greatest afflictions upon the children of God, are but corre­ctions, 314. How a correction differs from a judgment, ib. 315. A child of God is happy under all corrections, 316. What it is to de­spise corrections, opened, 319, 320
  • Crafty men, who they are, 273.
  • Craft, wisedome of natural men is craft, 275. Crafty men Satan desires to get to his side and [Page] service, why? pag. 276, 277, &c. Crafty men full of hopes, 279. and industry, ib. They want power to effect what they devise, 279. It is a wonderful work of God, to stop the devices of crafty men, p. 281. In what sence any of their devices prosper, 282. How God takes the wise in their craftiness, p. 284, 287. No craft of man can stand before the wisdome of God, p. 286.
  • Creatures, a book wherein we may learn much both of God and our selves, 618. Creatures can­not give us any comfort without God, 633. He can make any crea­ture helpful to us. ib.
  • Counsel, in counselling others, we should shew our selves ready to follow the same counsel, p. 233. God turns the counsels of wicked men against themselves, p. 287. What counsel is? 290. Rash, ha­sty counsels are successless, pag. 292.
  • Curse, What it is to curse, p. 190 The Saints in Scripture, rather prophesie of, then pray for curses upon the heads of wicked men, 191 No creature can stand before the curse of God. p. 196.
D
  • DAlilah, What it signifies, pag. 303.
  • Darkness in the day time, what it signifies, p. 293.
  • Death consumes us without noise, p. 153. Man cannot stand out the assauts of death, p. 154. We are subject to death every mo­ment, 155. Death hastens upon us all the dayes we live, 156, 157. What death is? p. 162. In death all natural and civil excellencies go away, p. 162. Greatest wise­dome to prepare to die well, 164. How man is said to perish for ever when he dies, 157, 158. Few of the living observe how suddenly others do, or themselves may die, 159. Thoughts of death laid to the heart, are a good medicine for an evil heart, 160. A happy death, what? 390. A godly man is a volunteer in death, 395. When a godly man dies, he hath had his fill of living, 396. In what sence a man may be said to die before his time, and in the midst of his dayes, 397. Assurance of a better life, carries us through all the paine of death with comfort, 457. So doth the testimony of a good con­science, 465. No evill in the death of a godly man, 480. Death the end of worldly comforts, pag. 618
  • Deliverance is of the Lord, pag. 341. The Lord can deliver as often as we can need deliverance, 341. God delivers his people from evill while they are in trouble, pa. 344.
  • Despaire, A godly man may think his estate desperate, p. 545.
  • Devices, what? p. 272.
  • Discontent at the dealings of [Page] God with us, a high point of fol­ly, 182. Discontent at the affli­ctions of God, afflicts more than those afflictions, p. 183.
  • Dreams, The several sorts, and causes of them, p. 636, 637. Our dreams are ordered by God, 638. Satan makes them terrible, p. 639.
E
  • EGg, White of an egg, what it emblems, p. 443
  • End, two wayes taken, p 599.
  • Envy, what it is? p. 180. Fnvy a killing passion, ib. 181. Envy a sign of folly, p. 184.
  • Errour, he that is shewed his er­rour, should sit down convinc'd, 529. He is in a fair way to truth, who acknowledges he may erre, p. 533. What is properly called an errour, as distinct from heresie, 533. Ʋpon what terms an errour is to be left, p. 534
  • Eternity, how the longest and the shortest, p. 644.
  • Example of God and Christ, how our rule, p. 175.
  • Exhortation a duty, p. 229. It must be joyned with reproof, ib. The best Saints on earth may need bro­therly exhortations, ib. Exhorta­tions must be managed with meek­ness; p. 230.
  • Experience the mistress of truth 186. Experience works hope, pag. 305.
F
  • FAll, A three-fold fall in Scrip­ture, p. 12.
  • Family, To order a family well, is a great point of wisdome, p. 387.
  • A family well ordered, is usually a prosperouus family, ib.
  • Famine, A very sore judgement, the effect of it, p. 345, 346. How many wayes the Lord redeems from famine, p. 347.
  • Fatherless, who, p. 546. Such in a sad condition, 548. A grievous sin to oppress them, p. 549.
  • Faith ought to be great, because God can do great things, p. 224. We must beleeve not only what we cannot see, but what we cannot un­derstand, 248. Faith should en­crease in us, when God works won­ders for us, p. 253, 254.
  • Fear, Natural what, p. 92. It is natural for man to fear at the appearances of God, & why, ib. Four effects or symptoms of natural fear 93. It is a strong passion, 98. From what kind of fear God exempts his people in times of danger, p. 358.
  • Fear, Holy fear what it is, pag. 19, 20. They who have most holy fear in times of peace. shall have most confidence in times of trouble 27. It keeps the heart and life holy 30. Fear of God ever joyned with love to our brethren, p. 495.
  • Fearful persons cannot be help­full, p. 516.
  • Eellow-feeling of others affli­ctions, [Page] a duty, p. 415. It adds to a mans affliction, when others have no feeling of it, 416. We cannot be truly sensible of the afflictions of o­thers, till we troughly weigh them, 417. He that hath not been afflict­ed, seldome feels the afflictions of others, ib.
  • Fool, who, and what a fool is, p. 177. Every wicked man is a fool, 181, 186. A fool ever worst when he is at ease, p. 186.
  • Foundation is the strength of the building, p. 149, 164.
  • Friend, An unfaithful friend fails us most, when we have most need of him, 516. A faithful fricnd who? p. 518.
  • Froward men who they are, pa.. 290.
G
  • GArments, testifie mans perfi­diousness against God, p. 498 Glory of God promoted, promotes the good of man, p. 576.
  • God can easily destroy his ene­mies, shewed in particulars, p. 57, 58. He can do it suddenly, 58, 59. Secretly, ib. Ʋnavoidably, ib. Man is not able to bear the presence of God, 95. Reasons why men trem­ble & fear at any greater manife­stations of Gods power or presence, 92. Man naturally prefers him­self before God, 110. It is high presumption for the best of men to compare with God, 111. God in himself is most just and pure, 112. Holiest men compared with God, are unholy, 113. God is so just and pure in himself, that he can do no wrong to any creature, 114. Ob­jections against this, answered, 115 &c. It cannot be ill with him, with whom God is, 119. To consider God in his greatness, is an excellent means to humble man, 236. The consideration of Gods greatness, should provoke us to seek him, ib. God can do great things as easily as the smallest things, 243. God can do the same things as often as he pleases, 256. God appears some­times as an enemy to his best frinds 433, 700. When God appears an enemy, man cannot bear it, ib. 4. 34. 704. Best to turn to God for com­fort in distress, p. 607
  • Godly, can be in no condition wherein God doth not love them, p. 193. A godly man hath help within him, when all worldly help fails, 486. A godly man hath a light within him in the greatest outward darkness, p. 488.
  • Good done is a reproach to us, when we do the contrary evil, pag. 18.
  • Grace, False grace fails when we have most need of it, p. 24. Our graces should be made visible in our actions, 29. Grace acts not alwayes alike, 30, 31. how failings in grace consist with sincerity, 31. Grace must not be trusted to▪ we may make Idols out of our own graces, p. 487.
  • Grass of the field, how man is compared to it, p. 389.
  • [Page]Greatness of Gods works, p. 240. The least works of God, have a greatness in them, because they are his, 240. A two-fold greatness in the works of God, p. 242.
  • Groping at noon-day, what it imports. p. 294.
H
  • HAllelujah, what it signifies, where first used in the Scrip­ture of the old and new Testament, p. 132.
  • Hand of God, how said to be loose­ned, p. 455. If God stretch out his hand of power, all creatures are helpt or destroyed by it, p. 456.
  • Hands hanging down, what meant by them, p. 9. Weakness of the hands arises four wayes, p. 10.
  • Happiness, what it is, p. 310. Many opinions about happiness, and whence they arose, ib. Why the Hebrew word for happiness is in the plural number, p. 311.
  • Hearing is more than a work of sence, p, 400.
  • Heart, a judiciary hard heart is the greatest judgment on this side hell p. 121. Setting the heart upon any thing, magnifies it, 657. Setting the heart, notes four things, 661. Our duty to set our hearts upon God, 663 Heart of man full of changes, 670.
  • Heresie, Three things concur to make a heresie, p. 533.
  • High, God can set us high and safe, p. 269.
  • Hirelings, who, p. 573. His eye upon his wages, more than upon his work, p. 582, 583.
  • Holiness, better than peace in our dwellings, p. 385, 388. What the holiness of the creature is, 469. We must go to God for holiness, 471. To despise holiness, is to despise God, p. 472.
  • Holy One, God is called the ho­ly One in five respects, p. 467. The excellency of the holiness of God, above that in men or Angels, shewed divers wayes, 468. None are fit for communion with God, but holy per­sons, p. 472.
  • Hope, What it is to hope, p. 22.
  • Hope taken two wayes, 304. The people of God have hope in the worst times, ib. It is no vain thing to hope in God, 305. Experience breeds hope, 305. Hope, is better to the people of God, then all their pos­sessions, 306. Hope that troubles will end supports the heart in bear­ing present troubles, p. 461.
  • Hopes deceived, trouble us more than wants, p. 511. Deceived hopes fill with shame, ib. Hope the last re­fuge, 601. A godly mans hope may lye prostrate, p. 602.
  • Humble, The apprehension of Gods great goodness, humbles man, p. 655
  • Hypocrites profession, grounded upon hope to gain by it, p. 25, 26. They cannot hold out in profession, because they want an inward prin­ciple, p. 505.
  • Hypocrisie paints the face as well as pride, p. 266.
I
  • [Page]INnocency, or an innocent person, whence called, p. 37. A man is bound to defend his own innocency, p. 409, 410.
  • Innumerable, a three-fold sence of it, p. 255.
  • Instruction, To instruct others, is a mans duty and his praise, p. 13. Such as know God aright, are rea­dy to instruct others in his know­ledg, ib. An honor to great men to instruct others, 14. It is easier in some cases to instruct than to learn, 18, 528. It is a shame when our actions cross our teaching, ib.
  • Invocation of Saints confuted, p. 171.
K
  • KNowing, Three sorts of know­ing men, p. 401.
  • Knowledge, or to know, taken five wayes in Scripture, p. 381. A man may know much, and yet get no good by it, p. 403.
L
  • LAbour, It is a sore affliction when we cannot enjoy our la­bours, p. 202. Except we labor, we have no right to eat, p. 574. we must not be displeased at our labor, ib.
  • Laughter, what it is, p. 360. To laugh, how taken in Scripture, with the kinds of it, 361, 362. A godly man laughs at, or triumphs over all outward evils, 364. Yea, though brought at once to charge against him, p. 366.
  • Lie, To lie taken Two wayes, p. 552. A lie cannot be long hid, p. 553.
  • Life, No strength in man can give him assurance of long life, p. 479. The life of man a warfare, 568. &c. The life of man is measured out by the will of God, 571. The decree of God concerning our lives, no ground for any to abate their care of preserving their lives, 572. Life short, 576. It is good for man that it is so, ib.
  • Light, A double light necessary to seeing, p. 294, It is a sore judge­ment not to see when light shines, p. 295.
  • Lions, their several names, p. 60. How they shadow several sorts of men, 61. How Tyrants resemble Lions, p. 62, 63.
  • Lowness, two-fold, p. 266, 268.
  • Low, They that are lowest, are neerest exaltation, 268. It is a won­derful work of God, to set on high those that be low, p. 270.
  • Lusts, Several lusts ast in several ages of man, p. 177.
M
  • MAgnifie, signifies 3 things, p. 650. God magnifies man four ways, 651. Especially by set­ting his heart upon man, p. 657.
  • Mans natural constitution, makes [Page] him sensible of affliction, 482. Mans worth is out of himself, 652. God bestows many thoughts upon man, p. 654.
  • Marvellous things what, p. 249. They are separated from man three wayes, ib. Ordinary works of nature and providence are marvellous in two respects, 251. Marvels are a token of Gods presence, 253. Many marvels wrought in our dayes, ib. Marvels should work faith in us, ib. 254. Christ will wonder at our un­belief, if we beleeve not, when he doth wonders, 254.
  • Mass, a Popish conceit about the Name of it, p. 489.
  • Memory, and to remember, what, p. 33.
  • The Works of God are to be re­membred, ibid.
  • Mercy, A three-fold mercy in God, p. 460. Mercy of God most moved towards us by telling him our misery, 609.
  • Miracles, Signs and Marvels, how they differ, p. 250, 251.
  • Morning, To do a thing in the morning, and every morning, what they import, p. 667, 723.
  • Moth, How man is crushed as a moth, a three-fold meaning of it, p. 152, 153.
  • Mourners described, p. 266. Such nearest joy and exaltation, 268.
  • Murmuring or complaining, To murmur at the dealings of God, is to make our selves juster than God, 123. complain to God, but not of God, 124.
  • Musing men no great talkers, p. 527.
N
  • NOstril of God, what meant by it, pag. 56.
  • Numbers, Three, six, and seven, how used in Scripture, 337, 338. Twice and thrice, three and four, six and seven, seven & eight, what they signifie in Scripture, 339, 340.
O
  • OLd-age, a full old-age, what? 390, 391. A perishign old-age, & a flourishing old-age, 392. A godly man ever dies in a full age, 394. A blessing to live to Old-age, 395.
  • Oppression, To oppress the poor and fatherless, a grievous sin, p. 549.
P
  • PAssion carries us out of our selves, p. 556.
  • Pardon of sin, God only can do it, p. 713. Why pardoning or re­mitting sin is committed to men, & in what sence, 714, 715. How par­don of sin is expressed in Scripture, 715, 716. When sin is pardoned, the punishment of sin is also par­doned, 717. Greatest sins pardon­able, 718. They whose sins are pardoned, may and ought to pray for pardon, 719. In two cases prayer for pardon is especially to be renewed, p. 712.
  • [Page]Peace with beasts, how? p. 378. When God is at peace with us, he can quickly make all Creatures at peace with us, 379. Peace a great mercy, 380, 383.
  • Perishing, or to perish taken five wayes in Scripture, p. 35, 36.
  • How righteous persons may, or cannot perish, p. 38, &c.
  • Persisting in evil most danger­ous, p. 557.
  • Pity what it is, p. 490, &c. It is a duty to pity the distressed, 494.
  • Plowing of iniquity, &c. p. 44.
  • Plowing referr'd to good actions, p. 45.
  • Poor. Some Gods poor, and some the Devils poor, p. 297. Poor are full of desires, because full of wants, 298. Poor most subject to oppression, 301. Wicked men plot against the people of God, how poor soever, and why, 301. God delights to help the poor, 302. Poor must take heed of greedy seeking the creatures, 522. Poor that are modest in asking, should be soonest supplied; 522.
  • Prayer, Some wicked men thrust out of the prayers of Gods people, p. 192. A dreadful thing to be so, 193. Prayer is the putting of our case to God; 228. They who pray much, expect much, 452. God of­ten keeps prayer by him unanswer­ed, 453. The return of prayer is the solace of the soul, 453.
  • Presence of God two-fold, p. 671. God can make his own presence grievous to us, 673.
  • Preservation of man the work of God, p. 692. Man wants a pre­server, and why, 693. How God is a preserver, 694. A necessity that God should be mans preserver, 695. He preserves his own people in a special manner, and why, 696. His preserving care is perpetual, 697.
  • Pride grows in the best soyl, 117. God resists the persons of the proud, and he will resist pride in his best friends, p. 118. Pride in apparel and beauty, p. 596, 597.
  • Probability of finding, is ground enough for seeking, 507.
  • Promises are the portion of Be­leevers, p. 403.
  • Providence, the common bles­sing of God, not dispenced without a special providence, p. 260, 261.
  • Providence watches over all crea­tures, most over such as are hurt­ful to man p. 627.
  • Prudence goes softly, p. 292.
  • Punishment may come long after the sin, p. 49. It shall be pro­portionable to the degrees of sin, 50. It shall not exceed the desert of sin, ibid. It is often like the sin in kind, 51. The strongest sinner shall not escape punishment, 65. Punishment is gradual, 66. Rea­sons why the Lord suspends punish­ment, 69. Wicked punish'd by those whom they have oppressed, 204, 206. God can punish the strongest by the weakest instru­ments, 207.
Q
  • [Page]Quections in Scriture, some­time heighten the sence, and sometime abate it, p. 649.
R
  • RAin, the benefit of it, p. 259. 260. How it is a special gift of God, 261. It is a wonderful work of God to send raine, 262. The giving of raine a motive to fruitful obedience, and a convicti­on of the disobedient, 263, 264.
  • Raine of Doctrine, 523.
  • Reason is the souls taster, pag. 562.
  • Redemption, what it is, p. 341, 521
  • Remembring, what it imports, when ascribed to God, p. 602.
  • Reproof must be sweeten'd with friendly insinuations, p. 6. It is no easie thing to bear a reproof, 7. in some cases we must reproove, whether men take it well or no, ibid.
  • Returning, what it imports in Scripture, p. 554. Return, return, what it imports, 555.
  • Reward, every man shall have a reward, p. 577.
  • Riches, wordly men very care­ful to secure their riches, p. 209. Ill gotten riches cannot be secured, 210. Riches, why called strength, 213.
  • Righteous, men so called in a four-fold sence, p. 37, 38.
S
  • SAints, what a Saint is, p. 173. It is our duty to look upon and imitate the examples of the Saints, 175. When God forsakes a man, the Saints on earth forsake him too 177.
  • Salvation or safety is of the Lord, p. 300.
  • Salt in our speech what, p. 442. Ministers of the Gospel, why called Salt, 449.
  • Sanctifie, how man sanctifies God, 473.
  • Sand of the sea applied three wayes in Scripture, p. 419.
  • Satisfaction for sin cannot be made by man, p. 688. A three­fold deficiency in all our works for that end, 689.
  • Scandal, what? 546.
  • Scourge of the tongue, vide Tongue.
  • Sea, three things in it most con­siderable, p. 624. How like man in his natural condition, 628. E­specially to covetous oppressors, 629
  • Season, every thing (even pale death) is beautiful in it, 397
  • Seeking implies four things, p. 227. We must seek God especial­ly in times of affliction, 230
  • Sence of want carries us to lo [...]k for a remedy, p. 507.
  • Shame, how caused, p. 511.
  • Shaddai, One of the names of God [Page] what it signifies, p. 327, 328.
  • Shadow, How taken in Scrip­ture, p. 580.
  • Sheol, How taken in Scripture, p. 615.
  • Shekel, Whence so called, it's use, p. 411.
  • Shiggaion, What it means, p. 532.
  • Sight of the eye, much comfort comes in by it, p. 606, 607.
  • Silence or stopping of the mouth caused two wayes, p. 307. Mouths of wicked men stopt two wayes, 308 Silence becomes learners, 529.
  • Sin, the material cause of it, is in our selves, p. 219, Sin is the me­ritorious cause of suffering, ib. We need no teaching to sin, 223, 224. Sin and sorrow the portion of man by nature, 224. They are contained vertually in our nature, ib. To sin is no burthen to a natural man, 225. Not to sin, how taken, 386. To be kept from sin is better than all outward blessings, 384, 387. Sin the greatest evill, 388. Sin contra­ry to the nature of God, 472. They who are sensible of sin, will pray hard for the pardon of it, 706. Sin­ners expect benefit by sin, 48. Sin persisted in, shall have a sorrowful reward, 48, 49.
  • Sleep, the ease of trouble and cares, p. 591. Bed cannot give sleep 592, 634.
  • Smallest matters fall under pro­vidence, p. 241.
  • Sorrow, we ought to give a rea­son of our sorrows, as well as of our hopes, p. 409. Great sorrow stops our speech and makes broken language, 423. Not to be able to express our sorrow is an increase of it, 424.
  • Soul of man is the man, p. 151. Mans excellency, 161, 162. Souls being separate from the body, 603, 604.
  • Sowing, How applied and taken in Scripture, p. 45, 46.
  • Speaking, when the heart is full of matter, it is a hard thing not to speak, p. 7.
  • Stones of the field, what it is to be in league with them, p. 370, 371 &c. How God turns stones into bread, and how man may be said to do so, p▪ 376.
  • Sword, Two swords of the mouth p. 199. The hand of the Sword, Sword in the hand, what they im­port, p. 349.
T
  • TEaching compared to raining, or holy doctrin to rain in four respects, p. 523, 524.
  • Teachable, a gracious spirit is teachable, and a teachable spirit is an excellent spirit, p. 528. Unteach­ableness more dangerous than ig­norance, ib.
  • Temptation by way of assay or tryal, p. 5. Temptation, prayer and meditation, the three great exerci­ses of a Christian, 568.
  • Terrours, after terrours God u­sually sends comforts, p. 104. Ter­rours of God what, why so called? 430, 431. Divers sorts of terrours [Page] sent from God. 431, 435. Spirituall terrours, as spiritual joyes are known to few, 436
  • Toughts compared to boughes or branches of a tree, and why, pag. 80. Toughts the flrst-borne of the soule, 81. A godly mans top-branches or highest thoughts, are about high­est things. 81. God never lost any one of his thoughts, or ever shall, pag. 281
  • Time, The shortnesso and speed of it, p. 600. Time past irrecoverable, 601.
  • Tongue, a scourge, and what the scourge of the tongue is, p. 351. &c. What it is to be hid from the scourge of the tongue, 354. It is most sad, when Christians scourge each other with the tongue, 356. It is a great mercie to be delivered from the scourge of the tongue, 357. The tongue discovers the iniquity of the heart, 561
  • Troubles afflict them most, who supposed themselves beyond trouble, p. 192.
  • Truth is infused not borne with us, p 76. God sometime (as it were) steales a truth into the hearts of his people 76. Why he is said to doe so 77. Holy truths are very pleasant to the care of a holy person. 78. Our hearts too narrow to take in or h [...]ld al the truths of God, 79. A godly man [...]ver receives somewhat, when truth is revealed. 79. God usually humble [...] man, before he shews him his truth. 97. Truth deserves our most diligent search, 401 We are to search and make truth our own, before we distribute it unto others, ibid. 402. Truth may challenge credit, ibid. Truth is the portion of the Saints, 403. Truth mis-applied is very un­savoury, and may be dangerous, 449 Truth must be made known 465. It is the study if a godly man to doe so, 466. Dangerous to conceale truth, ib. The strength of truth, naked truth is too hard for armed errour, 537. Common truths seriously to be studied. 601
V
  • VAnity graduall, Moneths of vanity, what, 585, 586. The vanity of mans life, shewed foure waies 644, &c.
  • Visions and revelations feigned often by false prophets, and why, p. 72 and Heathens, 73, 74. Foure sorts of visions or divine revelations observed among the Rabbins. 82. Three forts noted from Scripture, 83. Visions five waies distinguisht, 85, 86. A further sort of visions. 636.
  • Visit, To visit, what it imports, p. 385. Visitation of God three waies, 664, &c.
  • Understanding the work of it at­tributed to the tongue and sences, why. p. 559.
  • Unsearchablenesse of God in his works two waies considered, p. 245. 246.
  • Uprightnesse, what, p. 22. It makes us confident in saddest times, 28. It hath boldnesse, 553. and stedfastnesse, 554. an upright heart, [Page] the more it is searched, the better it proves. 558
  • Uselesse, to be uselesse is in Scripture account, to be essenceless, p. 515.
W
  • VVArre usually accompanied with famine, and why, pag. 348. Warr a devourer. ib.
  • Warfare The life of man is a war­fare, shewed in six particulars, pag. 565. &c
  • Weavers shutle, life of man like it, 598. &c.
  • Whale, why God sets a watch over him. 625. &c.
  • Wicked man may flourish in great outward prosperity, 188. The pati­ence of God glorified in the prosperity of wicked men, 188. Two other rea­sons why they are permitted to pro­sper, 189. Wicked men may flourish a great while, ib. They are under a curse while they flourish. 193.
  • Wickedness is very laborious, p. 47. There is an art in wickednesse, 48
  • Wife, good wife the beauty and ornament of the house, p. 385.
  • Wind, vaine winds compared to wind, 543, 544, How the life is a wind. 502. &c.
  • Wisdom, is the stability of things 274
  • Wise men to whom plaine things may be darke and obscure, p 296.
  • Wit often abused by Satan, 266, &c.
  • [...] works, p. 34. A caution about it, ib. word of God, how it may be hid, and how not. 462.
  • Words the conceptions of the mind, as hard to keepe them in as children ready for the birth, p. 7, 8. Words of the wise very powerfull, 15. Right words very strong, three things in right words, 5 [...]5, 536
  • Works of God are perfect works, 238. work of man put for his re­ward, 582
  • World, when we are most retired from the world, we usually have and are most fit to have communion with God, 88. wordly men would live alwaies in the world, 644.
  • Worldly good things not good in themselves, p. 189. They are no ar­gument that a man who hath them is good, 190 No evidences of the fovour of God, 194. The best of worldly things loathed, if long used, spirituall things, the more used, the more desired, 310. Best of worldly things fading, 384. The world is but for this life, 610
  • Woundings by the hand of God are often preparatoric to a cure. 332. God never makes a wound too bigg for his own cure. 334. And he can easily cure all the wounds which the malice of man can make, 335
  • Wrath, what it is, p. 178. Wrath kils three at once, 180
Y
  • YE [...] and nay what they signifie in [...], 51 [...]

A Table of those Scriptures, which are occasionally cleared and briefly illustrated in the fore-going EXPOSITIONS. The first Number directs to the Chapter, the second to the verse, the the third to the page of the BOOK.

Genesis.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.2.585
1.4.43
1.9.22
1.16.242
2.7.604
2.25.274
3.1.273, 374
3.3.344
3.22.8
6.5.219
9.27.180
11.3.145
11.5.417
14.14.14
16.12.438
17.13.92
17.17.362
18.12.361
18.14.250
18.21.417
22.17.419
25.8.392, 395
25.25.237
29.25.512
30.8.290
32.2.129
32.24.89
34.1, 2.43
35.5.430
35.11.328
40.30.708
47.6.212
47.13.17
48.14.560
48.17.248
49.3, 4.161
49.9.546

Exodus.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
4.25, 26.674
8.18.249
8.22, 23.345
12.13, 14.711
14.24.58
14.31.128
15.10.716
20.20.27
22.6,209
28.8.272
32.1.509
32.32.718
33.2.695
33.16.250
34.7.708, 713

Leviticus.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
10.3472
13.3, 8.191
16.22.710
20.17.490
26.41.702

Numbers.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
11.20.319
12.6, 7, 8.83
14.9.205
14.19.258
21.8.102
23.21.46

Deuteronomie.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.18255
4.15. 16,102
7.7.663
8.2.669
9.14.675
11.8, 11, 12.264
13.14.125
17.8.250
17.13.516
19.18,125
22.4332
24.15.582
28.67.592
32.2.524
32.13.374
32.21.208
32.31.648
34.7.392

Joshua,
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.5672
1.8.559
7.19.683
21.45.122
23.13.35
23.14.122

Judges.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
5.2.569
5.28.509
8.21.699
9.15.208
6.54.207
10.13.256
10.10, 14.342
15.19.439
16.29.504
20.16.386

Ruth.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
3.8.504

1 Samuel.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.16.621
1.27.305
2.5.338
3.1.85
3.12.238
7.12.375
9.9.85
14.6.243
16.14.430
20.19.372
24.14:301
15.41.656
27.12.157
28.21.17

2 Samue.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.14, 26.365
7.15, 25, &c.720
9.8.655
15.25.232
[...]6.10, 11.500
16.21.11
[...]8.3.662
19.25.158
19.35.256
23.9.44

1 Kings.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.8.535
4.29.4 [...]0
5.4.699
6.19.5

1 Kings.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
14.12, 13.391
17.1.262
18.21.81
19.12.103
22.29.520

2 Kings.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
15.5.545

1 Chronicles.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
17.16.655
23.25.157

Ezra.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
9.13.242. 272

Nehemiah.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
9.26.716
13.14 22.609

Job.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
9.9.152
12.21.673
15.3.543
15.25, 26.702
14.14.157
16.2.49
16.13.701
20.17.604
24.25.552
27.16.205
29.6.374
29.14.594
30.2.392
31.8.203
32.14.432
34.3.223
34.15.35
34.14.664
35.6▪ 7686▪ 687
36.22.524
38.25.263
41.29.365

Psalmes.
Psal.Vers,Pag.
2.1.280
2.12.56
4.4.89
46.605
5.3.437
7.14.279
8.4.651
9.18.133
10.18.30 [...]
11.4.553
16.10.605
18.26.191
19.12.531
22.15.489
23.5.203
33.6.257
25.16.174
30.6. 7.192
32.1.312
32.2.8
32.9.627
34.6.298
34.10.68
35.10.640
37.10.618
37.16.194
37.25.41
37.35.187
37.36.502
37.37.480
38.2.424
39.2.626
39.4.164
39.5.157
39.10, 11.154
39.6.647
39.13.461
40.9, 10.465
41.3.635
44.4.341
45.5.425
465.667
4913.20
49.20.35
5017.716
50.21437
51.4.110
51.13.13
52.2.459
55.12.4 [...]9
55.23.397
56.2.212
58.7.426
58.11.239
62.9.415
62.10.583, 662
64.8.288
64.9, 10.305
68.9.261
68.9, 10.525
68.10, 30.368
68.12.385
68.12, 13, 14.366
72.17.152
73.12.39
73.14.668
73.22.441
74.11.457
74.19.298, 368
75.1.253
75.8.322
76.4.428
56.5.280
78.20.256
78.27.419
78.38.608
79.12.51
84.1.535
84.11.673
86.13.615
88.5.545, 594
89.39.552
90.9.597
90.20.653
91.5.426
91.7.350
91.11.373
95.11.56
102.23, 24.397
102.25.393
103.8.56
103.16.157, 618
160.15.193
111.2.34
111.4.33
111.7.34
112.7.352
112.10.179
116.3.626
116.6.181
118.22.323
119.59.273
119.113.85
125.2.340
126.4.501
127.2,445
127.2.634
127.4.349
130.5.475
131.1.252
133.1.498
136.4, 5, 6.251
139.1, 2.677
139,8.615
139.23.553
141.3.626
142.2.231
144.4.647
149.6.346

Proverbs.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.27.99
3.29.44
4.27.45
5.19.531
6.11.521
6.18.44
7.22.327
9.12.400
12.27.202
13.15.213
14.3.354
14.17.16
17.17.518
17.26.134
18.1.227
18.10.267
18.14.421
19.24.457
20.8.553
21.4.44
21.15.179
21.30.286
22.22.546
23.2478
23.5.648
23.7.420
23:10, 11.549
24.10672, 675
24.16.12
27.3.183
29.18.84
30.15, 18, 21.339
31.10, 11.127
31.21.363
31.31.199

Ecclesiastes.
Chap.Ver.Pag.
2.10.202
3.13.202
3.19, 20, 21.604
7,2,160.
8.8.266
9.140
9.10.158
10.19.173
11.8.340
12.1.33, 392
12.2.341, 616
12.13.151

Canticles.
Chap.Vers.Pag
7.4.27

Isaiah.
Chap.Vers-Pag.
1.1.500
1.6.202
1.24.315
1.29.511
2.4349
3.1.345
3.6, 7.331
3.9.510
5.2.374
5.2, 5.375
5.6,261
5.19,308
6.5.473
6.8.191
6.9, [...]0.295
6.13.486
7.13.257
8.19.103
9.63 [...]8
[...] [...] [...]
10.18.489
10.19.255
11.4.358
11.7, 8. 9,378
14.18.344
16.14.574
19.6.303
205.512
21.6, 11.668
25.9.305
26.9444
26.11.307
26.16.665
27.9.316
28.18, 19.35 [...]
28.21.252
29.4.103
29.6.205
[...]0.5.512
30.20.441
30.33.56
3 [...].4.292
33.9, 10.268
33.16.169
33.18, 20.383 412
33.21.303, 412
33.21, &c.694
32.24.7 [...]7
38.2.608
38.3.609
38.11.607
38.12.156, 599
38.17.716
38.18.158
40.6.162, 389
40.15.244
43.2.344
[...].7▪23 [...]
44.22,613
45.7.222
51.6, 7.153
53.2.188
53.3.i0, 418
53.5.327, 332
53.6.708
53015.588
56.3.390
56.12.572
57.1.35, 159
57.15.454
57.16.15, 482
57.19.198
58,1.621
58.7.332
591, 2.220
59.6.280
65.11,588
65.17.243
65.22.331
66.24.595

Jeremiah.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.10.537 191
2.5.648
2.25,542
2.34.5 [...]0
418.47
5,13.54 [...]
5.24.264
6.11.391
8.7.440
94.518
[...]2 [...]2 [...]
12.2.188
15.1, 2.664
17.6.605
18.18.352, 275 358
20.9.6, 7
22.29.653
33.22.419
38.4.10
50.20.717
50.43.352

Lamentations.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.12.416
2.14.442
3.1.605
3.23.667

Ezekiel.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
7.17.11
13.10.449
16.14.653
18.2.200
23.4.382
34.4.178, 331
39.2.338
40.4.662

Daniel.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.10.585
4.4.187
4.13, 14.166
7.15.181
10.3.445
11.33, 34, 35.116

Hosea.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.6.209
2.14.180
4.4.376
4.8.712
5.10.376
5.12.153
9.2.552
11.8 9.315
12.1.543
13.9.2 [...]0
14.5.187

Joel.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.14.508
2.26.510

Amos.
Chap.Ver.Pag.
1.3.339, 340
3.6.221
3.8.7
46.37
4.8.261
5.21.641
7.8.711
9.1.201

Jonah.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.17.589
3.9.508

Michah.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
5.5.341
6.6,688
6.15.203
7.19.716
7.3.234, 559
7▪9.183
7.16▪307
7.18.713

Habakkuk.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.8.598
3.1.532
3.14.190
3.17.552

Zachariah.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.8.131
1.15.193.
1.10.537.
4.7.649.
8.9, 13.10
9.12.304
11.15.178.
11.17.294.
14.6▪102.
2.5.794

Malachy.
Chap.Vers.Pag
3.17.697.

Matthew.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
4.6373.
5.22.676
5.45.263.
6.12714
6.33194, 317.
7.22.512.
7.29.538.
8.9.568.
8.17.709.
11.29.176.
13.21.189.
21.19.507.
23.2, 3.538.
23.4.224.
24.40, 41.345.
26.39.711.
27.19637
27.46.720

Marke.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
6.2, 6.253.
6.16.266.
949.223

Luke.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.46650.
1.51.268.
1.63.665.
6.25.362
6.38.364.
12.19.572.
12.20.186.
13.9718.
13.26.605.
15.32.515.
17.4.714.
18.8.271.
18.14.107.
23.31.101.
24.37.94.

John.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.5.296.
2.23, 24.128.
3.14.708.
3.16.36.
5.17.237.
9.4.276.
9.27.400.
12.19279.
1013.583.
13.7.247.
14.18.302.
20.23.714.
21.18.702.

Acts.
Chap.Vers.Pag▪
8.23.714.
13.10.275.
13.22470.
13.46.533.
13.9.553.
14.17.295.
17.27.264.
28.27.296.

Romans.
1.18.464.
2.14.140.
2.23, 24.539.
4.18.477.
5.4.306.
5.6, 7.491.
8.32.460, 715.
8.35, 36.364.
  367.
9.33.510.
11.13.650.
11.33.245.

1 Corinthians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.25.287.
3.2.561.
3.19.285.
4.4.140.
7.20.575.
5.1.150.
6.20.521.
7.31.384.
8.2.528.
9.9.661.
9.22.448.
10.13.344.
13.9.77.
15.32.369.
15.50.96.
15.55.364.

2 Corinthians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.17, 20.514
3.18.471.
4.3, 4.295.
4.7.145, 475.
4.8, 9.41.
4.17.660.
4.12, 17.316.
5.11.434.
5.4.321.
5.21.381.
9.6.45.
10.4, 5.77, 284.
11.14.130.
12.1.86.
12.10.304.
13.8.225.

Galathians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
6.1.6, 12.

Ephesians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.13.198.
5.15.273.

Phillipians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.28.521.
2.16.463.
3.21.596.

Colossians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.20.139.
2.15.521.
4.6.449.

1 Thessalonians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
5.20.326.

2 Thessalonians.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.2.74.
2.3.36.
3.12.574.

1 Timothy.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
3.3.354.
3.4, 5.387.
4.12.326.
6.16.136.

2 Timothy.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
2.3.459.
2.15.448.

Titus.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
1.7.354.
2.15.326.
3.10.533.

Hebrewes.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
3.11.551.
3.13.229.
4.15.417, 418.
5.7.721.
6.7, 8.524.
10.4.689.
11.8.248.
11.10.149.
12.1.176.
12.2.175, 324.
12.611.
12.10.317, 318.
125.325.
1214.473.

James.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
12.367.
1.17.645.
1.15.490.
1.27.495.
4.14.614
5.17.262.

1 Peter.
Chap.Vers.Pag
1.6.323.
2.22.708.
4.14.364.

2 Peter.
Chap.Vers.Pag
1.4.469.
2.18.544

1 John.
Chap.Vers.Pag
2.12.715
2.16.180.
2.20.225
3.9.225

Jude.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
00.12.515.
00.22.449.
00.22, 23.527.
00.16.544.

Revelation.
Chap.Vers.Pag.
4.6368.
5.8 9.368.
7.6.255.
9.12.36.
11.5, 10.357.
14.13.47.
16.15.76.
18.6.51.
18.21.716.
21.27.48.
FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.