A DISCOURSE
Written to a Learned Frier, shewing that the Systeme of M. Des Cartes, and particularly his Opinion concerning Brutes, does contain nothing dangerous; and that all he hath written of both, seems to have been taken out of the First Chapter of GENESIS.
I Know very well, that Moses hath not written his Genesis with a design to explain to men the Secrets of Nature; but I do also know, that being inspired by God, as he was, [Page 4] he could say nothing about the production of the World, which is not true. And therefore I esteem, that to find the Principles of Natural Philosophy infallible, they are not to be sought but in that History which He hath given us of the Creation of the World; or at least, that we ought to esteem false whatever is said of Nature, when it cannot be reconciled with all the Circumstances of this History.
Do not wonder therefore that I so often refer you to Genesis, and that I lay so much weight upon the Principles of Monsieur Des Cartes. Most of his Tenets are so conform to what Moses hath said, that it seems, he became a Philosopher only by the Reading of this Prophet. But that you may the more easily apprehend how great an agreement [Page 5] there is between that Sacred Writing and his Philosophy, I intend to expound unto you the first Chapter of Genesis literally; and you'l see, that in doing so, I shall discourse to you almost the same things which I told you last, when I explained to you the Principles of M. Des Cartes.
The only difference you'l find is, that M. Des Cartes writeth things more particularly, and with a design to make them known what they are in themselves; whereas Moses writeth like an Historian, who discourseth of Nature only so far as was needful to make us admire the power of the Author thereof. Thus the one speaketh only of the principal things, and the other dives more into particulars; and yet all these particulars are clearly nothing else but a more [Page 6] ample explication, and a Sequel of those main things which Moses hath recited in so concise, so bold, and so true a manner.
I told you the other day, that M. Des Cartes in the beginning of his Principles useth much reasoning to shew, That there is a God: That all what is, is only by him: That he begun this great piece of Workmanship, which we call the World, by creating Bodies: That from that time he moved them, and that he still continues to move them. I also told you, that among so many differences, which the Figures may make between Bodies, M. Des Cartes takes notice of three principal ones; that he shews, there is a very great Number, of such as are round like little Balls; others, subtil enough to fill the spaces left by these Balls between themselves; [Page 7] and others again, whose irregular Figures do so entangle them one with another, that they may compose the greater Masses.
I added, that examining the several changes, which the Matter or the Aggregate of all these Bodies may have suffered successively, M. Des Cartes sheweth, that there may have been formed many Masses of different bignesses, of a figure approaching to that of the Earth; above which he sheweth, that there was to remain a number of particles, some like those which compose the Water, and others like those which compose the Fire: That this Aggregate of Earth, Water, and Air, was to be mixed, and surrounded with an almost infinite number of those little Bodies made in the form of Globules, and with these other subtiler [Page 8] ones that were to fill up their Intervalls. And that, lastly, M. Des Cartes repeats often, that God entertains in a continual motion this subtile matter, which else could not be moved.
Now all this, if you mark it, is nothing else, than to describe Philosophically and exactly (for the making out of the least circumstances of it) the same wonders which Moses hath described Historically in these few Lines; God created in the beginning Heaven and Earth. Now the Earth was void, and brought forth nothing, because it was covered with deep waters; Darkness was upon the face of this Abyss, and the Lord moved a subtil matter upon the Waters.
He that shall well examine [Page 9] what the Prophet hath said, will find that 'tis the same thing which the Philosopher hath endeavoured to explain.
The FIRST DAY.
IF we shall follow the one in the progress of his Reasonings, and the other in the progress of his History; we may judge, that it is of Moses, that Des Cartes hath learned, that the Light was made before the Sun; at least it will appear, that this place of Genesis, which for so many ages hath perplexed mens spirits, is found happily cleared, according to the Letter, by the Principles of M. Des Cartes.
[Page 10] Moses having shewed that the Earth was infertile because of the Waters encompassing it, and the Celestial matter useless, because the motions of it were not regulated; he goes on to shew, that God, who does nothing in vain, began, for the ordering of all these things, with the Creation of Light: He expresseth himself magnificently, as he is wont to do; and maketh the Almighty speak on this occasion in such a manner, which is capable all alone to perswade, that it is the Lord himself that made him speak thus.
Behold his Expressions; And God said, Let there be Light, and there was Light. He adds, That God saw, his work was good; that he divided the Light from the Darkness; and that he gave the name of Day to the Light, [Page 11] and the name of Night to Darkness
There is no man of good sense, who sees not, that Moses, having declared, that in the beginning God created Heaven & Earth, & that certain Bodies, subtil enough to be called Spirits, were carried to and fro, does signifie, that all the Bodies were already created; and that God did maintain from that time in the whole mass of matter as much motion, as he conserves in it now; and that what he hath made in all the following six dayes, was only to put those Bodies in order, and to regulate all their motions.
So that, if speaking like an Historian, Moses hath marked out the first day of this admirable Contrivance by the formation of Light, this signifies only to us, that God disposed the Bodies, [Page 12] as they ought to be, to produce this wonderful effect; which was sufficient for an Historian; but the Philosopher was to make it out, how these Bodies were to be disposed for that purpose.
Wherefore chusing from among all the Figures those, which might be most proper for the little Bodies which cause Light, and seeing that those, which he had described as Globules, being moved in a certain manner, would be satisfactory to all that is known of the Rayes which are made by the Light; M. Des Cartes hath supposed, that there were formed divers Vortexes or Whirl-pools of these little round Bodies, and that many of them turning round about one and the same Center, a part of the matter, which fills up their Intervalls, was gathered towards the Center, whence it [Page 13] did propel the Globules which surrounded it; so that this pressure of the Globules made Light in all those places, where was found a sufficient conflux and heap of subtile matter.
But he adds, that as in this beginning there was not yet a great plenty of these more subtil parts in the Centers of the Whirlpools, the action, which pressed the Globules, did not reach far; so that the places, which its effect could not reach to, remained in darkness, whilst the other were already enlightned: which agreeth admirably with the effect, which Moses ascribeth to the first Word of the Lord, which did separate the Light from the Darkness, from the time it began to form it: From thence also we may say, according to Genesis, that the Night was where the Darkness [Page 14] had remained; and the Day, where the Light had begun.
You will observe, that by the Word Light, we are here to understand nothing else but that, which is the cause, that the Bodies, called Luminous, excite in us the sentiment,, which makes us perceive them, and not the sentiment it self.
Men do often confound these two things, and 'tis certainly from thence that all the doubts proceed that are met with on this Subject. But me thinks, that in what Moses hath written of Light, 'tis evident, that he would only speak of what is found on the part of the Bodies, and not of the Effect which it produceth in such Subjects as are capable to have the sense of it; since it is certain, according to Moses, that when that, which is called Light, [Page 15] was created, there was yet none of the other Creatures which are esteemed capable to perceive it.
I desire you to observe by the by another thing, which is; That this sentiment, which we have from Luminous Bodies, is in such a manner on the part of our Soul, and hath such a necessary respect to the motion of certain parts of our Brain, that very often, without the excitation of the nerves of our Eyes by any Luminous body, we have the sense of Light. Thus in Dreams, the fortuitous course of the Spirits moving those parts of our Brain, the agitation whereof is designed to excite in us that sentiment, maketh us clearly see Objects that are not present: And by the same reason those, who marching in a very obscure place hurt their [Page 16] head against the Wall, are subject to see a thousand Fires; whence we are to conclude, that those motions of the Brain which have nothing that resembleth the thoughts which arise in the Soul on their occasion, may be excited by other Bodies than those we call Luminous. But it was very proper, not to give this name but to Bodies, whose figure and motion were so proportionate to the fineness and tenderness of our Eyes, that their nerves might be moved by them without pain, and without danger to the other parts of our Body. Wherein, me thinks, M. Des Cartes hath succeeded admirably well; it being not possible to assign to Luminous Bodies a fitter Figure than that which he hath given them, nor a motion more convenient, than that which he hath ascribed to them.
The SECOND DAY.
MOses relating what passed the Second Day, for the formation of the Firmament, expresseth himself in these terms; God said, let the Firmament be in the midst of the Waters, and let it separate the one from the other. He adds, that the Firmament was presently made, and the Waters were separated from the Waters, so that there were some of them above and some under the Firmament, which he called Heaven.
To understand how the Waters were separated one from the other by the formation of the Firmament, according to the sentiment of M. Des Cartes, we shall [Page 18] need only to relate what he teacheth of the Waters and of the Firmament.
Those who have read what he hath written thereof, do know, that after he had considered all the effects of Water, he conceived that the particles, which compose it, must be smooth, long and pliant; and that by this supposition alone he hath rendred a reason of all what is observed in Water, whether it be running, or whether it enlarge it self in a Vessel, or whether we see it in drops, or in the form of a Scum, or whether it rise in Vapours, or whether, remaining without motion, it appear in Ice or Snow.
We know also, that he supposeth, that there hath been a great number of these particles very smooth and very pliant, mingled with other bodies, a great part [Page 19] of which had figures so embarassing, that their Aggregate could form no other but hard Masses.
Lastly, We know, that he supposeth these last particles have been the matter of many Masses almost like the Earth; and forasmuch as these Masses could not be very solid & very hard, but by an extream pressing of the Branchy particles which compose them, it is evident, that the particles of water which were mixed therewith, were driven out of it, and that so the surfaces of those great Masses were to be altogether covered with it.
This being supposed, it is now to be observed, that, according to M. Des Cartes, the formation of the Firmament is nothing else but a perfect disposition and ranging of all the Whirlpools, of which I have already spoken in [Page 20] the Subject of Light: Their number is so great, and the space they fill so vast, that the word Firmament, according to the truest interpretation, signifieth a vast extension. There is nothing that deserveth more this name, than their Aggregate. But as we ought to mark the time of the formation of every thing, only from the moment which giveth it its perfection; M. Des Cartes having supposed, that the Aggregate of all the whirlpools was not yet well ordered, when the Light began, nor their motion very free, doth mark the time of the formation of the Firmament, then only, when they were so well adjusted, that the Ecliptick of the one answering to the Poles of the other, they began to move among themselves with a motion altogether free, and so proportioned, [Page 21] that not any one received a Let from all those, which encompassed it.
'Tis at this instant, that, according to Des Cartes's Hypothesis, the Masses, which were in the same Vortex, where the Earth was, began to be separated from it by the matter of that Vortex, which insinuated it self betwixt them, and which kept them more or less distant from the Center, according to the difference of their grossness or solidity. Now, as we have noted, that they were all covered with their Waters, and that the matter of the Vortexes (which, according to this Doctrine, is the matter of the Firmament) separated them from the Earth, it was true to say, following the same Doctrine as well as that of Genesis, that the Waters were severed from the Waters, [Page 22] by the formation of the Firmament.
Thus M. Des Cartes, who seems always to follow Moses, disposeth the Waters so, that they are some above, and some under the Firmament. For we know, that what the Prophet calls in this place Ʋnder, is the Earth we inhabit; and all that is severed from it by the Celestial matter, may be said, in respect of us, to be above the Firmament.
I do not explain this more at large, nor do I examine, how well these different Conservatories of Waters, which M. Des Cartes placeth in several parts of Heaven, do represent those Cataracts, whence the Lord drew forth, at the time of his wrath, what served to overwhelm the Earth.
Neither do I make reflection [Page 23] upon the Changes, which have happened to the Earth by this super-abundance of Waters. This is perhaps the cause of the Clouds, Rains, and the first apparition of that admirable Phaenomenon, which the Lord made use of to secure Noah against the apprehensions of a new Deluge, when he promised him to shut up for ever those Cataracts, which he had opened for his vengeance; but this would carry us too far.
The THIRD DAY.
THe Third Day Moses observeth, that, the Waters covering the Globe of the Earth, it was convenient to gather them together into certain places, to the end that the other parts thereof remaining discovered, the Earth might produce Herbs, Plants and Trees of all kinds. He saith, that the same word, which had operated the wonders of the precedent days, wrought that also. To which he adds, that what appeared dry, was called Earth, and the collection of the Waters, Sea.
Now it is evident, that if the [Page 25] Earth had remained perfectly round, the waters could not have been gathered into places, to leave others dry. We must therefore believe, that the same day, which saw the separation of the Waters from the Earth, saw also the formation of the Hills, and that certain parts of the Earth being raised above others, left Vallies betwixt them for Beds to the waters, and Cavities under their Elevations, to receive a quantity of water, approaching to that which should appear no more. 'Tis thus, that M. Des Cartes explicateth the matter. He declareth also, how the Earth was enabled to produce herbs, plants and trees, and how the different Juices, which run within the bosom of the Earth insinuate themselves into several Seeds, whose pores are adapted to their figure.
[Page 26] I desire you in this place to observe, that Moses saith not, that God made any Soul for Plants; he only saith, that the Earth, rendred fertile by the word of the Lord, did produce them. But those Philosophers who have alwaies had recourse to Souls, when they would explicate the effects of certain Organical Bodies, of which they could not discover the Springs, have given one to every Plant. They have believed, that it was impossible, to give an accompt of Vegetation without it. But M. Des Cartes, without adding any thing to the Scripture, where Moses speaketh of Plants, of their Seeds, of their increase and fruit without speaking of any Soul, hath believed, there needed none to be supposed to give a reason of their Nutrition; and he hath so clearly [Page 27] shewed, that Vegetation is performed by the local motion of the parts which come in afresh, and by the fitness of their figure to the pores of that plant, which they are proper to increase, that I think I may assure, that there is none, how little soever accustomed to Ratiocination, but will acknowledge, after he hath examined what he saith on this Subject, that there remains not the least probability to maintain, that Plants have Souls.
Yet you know, that there are yet some who will defend, that there are Vegetative Souls. But what, I pray, can authorize them? Not Reason surely. That tells us all, that things ought not to be multiplied without necessity; and since we do manifestly see, that Figure and Motion may be the entire cause of Vegetation, [Page 28] we ought not to no purpose have recourse to Souls. Nor can it be the Authority either of Man, or of the H. Scripture; for that of Man cannot be considerable against the evidence of natural Notions, and against the Experiments by which this Errour is convinced. As to that of Sacred Writ, it is manifest, that that is not on their side, and nothing appears there that may come near to what they would attribute to Plants, viz. a Vegetative Soul.
The FOURTH DAY.
THe Fourth Word did form two great Luminaries in the Firmament, to divide perfectly the Day from the Night, and to mark the difference of Dayes, Seasons and Years. The same Word formed also the Stars, according to the History of Moses.
M. Des Cartes explaining this as a Naturalist, saith, that the several Vortexes, which had been formed of all the Celestial matter, having been adapted to one another, as was most convenient for the continuation of their motions, there flowed so much of the most subtil matter towards [Page 30] the Center of each of them, by the pressure of the Globules, which tended to recede from it, that at length each of the Whirlpools came to have in his middle so great a quantity of this matter, that it was able to propel the globules to the extremities' of the Whirlpool, and by this action to form such Rays, as those are, whose force makes us see the shining Sun.
He adds, that this subtil matter, gathered at the Center of each Vortex, may have force enough to thrust the Globules of the Neighbouring Vortexes, and to make there its action sensible. So that, according to this Author, the shining collection of subtil matter, which was made in the Center of this Vortex wherein was the Earth, was, in respect of it, the greatest Luminary, [Page 31] that is, the Sun: Those that were made in the other Vortexes, were Stars; and that of all the great Masses, which was found nearest, and most disposed to propel towards it the Light of the Sun, was the lesser Luminary, that is, the Moon. I shall say no more of it; and 'tis so well known, that the difference of Dayes, Nights and Seasons comes from the different situation, wherein the Earth, the Sun & other Stars are found, that I should be tedious to repeat here what M. Des Cartes hath written on this Subject.
The FIFTH & SIXTH DAY.
THe Fifth Day God said; Let the Waters produce the Moving Creature that hath a living Soul, and Fowl that fly above the Earth. And the Sixth Day he said, Let the Earth bring forth the Living Creature after its kind, Cattel, and creeping things, and Beasts of the Earth. I do not add the rest; for it is enough to say, that God would have it so, to let men know, that it was so.
This Place teaching us, that if it may be said, that Fish and the other Brute Animals have Souls, [Page 33] these Souls are produced by the Waters and the Earth; M. Des Cartes had reason to believe, that what is here called Soul, is nothing else but little Bodies so adjusted to the Organs of Fishes and other Brutes, that they make them live, move and grow.
He hath admirably explained upon this Subject the Circulation of the Bloud; the manner how it is heated in the Heart; how it runs into the Arteries, whose different pores let out the particles, which their figure maketh fit for the nourishment of the Members; and how the finest parts of all extricate themselves from the rest, to go to the Brain, whence they are distributed into Muscles, where they serve for the motion of the whole Body.
He doth give such an accurate accompt of all these things only [Page 34] by the figure and the motion of the little Bodies, and the disposition of the Organs, that there can remain no doubt of them. And that it may not seem a wonder, what he saith of the heat of the Bloud, which he maketh the chief Spring of all those Functions, commonly called Vital and Animal, he proves, that they must necessarily be performed by Bodies, without the need of any Soul; adding to his Reasons the example of certain Liquors, which are cold to the touch when they are asunder, but grow presently hot, even to a degree of ebullition, when they are blended together. As this effervescence happens to Liquors, which are not so much as suspected to have Souls, M. Des Cartes hath, me thinks, advanced nothing but what is rational, when he saith, [Page 35] That the heat of the Bloud, joined to the disposition and the dependance of the Organs, is able without a Soul to cause the nutrition and motion of Brutes.
Me thinks also, that he had reason, since, what the Vulgar Translation calls a Living Soul, was produced by the Waters and the Earth, to believe, that this kind of Souls were only Bodies. And indeed there are so many places, whereby we may know, that this was the meaning of Moses, that 'tis a wonder to me to find men still doubting thereof.
I should tire you to recite them all to you; let me only desire you to reflect a little on Lev. 17. 11. where you will plainly find what it is that enlivens Flesh and Beasts; The Soul of all Flesh is in the Bloud. The same saith M. Des Cartes. But Deut. 12. 23. Moses [Page 36] expresseth himself yet more clearly, to make us understand, that Beasts have no other Souls than the Bloud: Only be sure that thou eat not the Bloud: for the Bloud is the Soul. And that it might be yet more understood, he adds; And therefore thou maist not eat the Soul, but shalt pour it upon the Earth as water. Is there not then all the reason in the world, that those Souls, which the earth produceth, which may be eaten, and poured out upon the earth as water, should be counted among Bodies?
I grant indeed, that the bloud, when it is heated, is exhaled in very subtil parts, and that these fine parts are those, which do nourish and move. But how subtil soever they be, they are Bodies, and they have nothing more of spiritual in them, than [Page 37] flame, composed of parts yet more subtil, which yet never any man was so unadvised as to call spiritual.
I wonder for my part, that those who have given Souls to all that is nourish'd, have given none to a Flame, which converts into it all the bodies it lays hold on. And (what is more) I wonder, how men could come to attribute to Souls the cause of Nutrition and Motion, whereas we see nothing but Body that is capable to be moved, and that Nutrition is nothing else but an addition of Bodies to Bodies. But without insisting so much upon Ratiocination, is it not visible, that Moses (who certainly ought to be believed) acknowledges no other thing for the cause of the motion and nutrition of Beasts, but the bloud? I think not, that any man, who [Page 38] considers it, will contend about it any longer.
But that you may the better know the force of all these passages, which hitherto I have only taken according to the Vulgar Translation, and which, according to this version, leave no difficulty, although the word Soul have been there employed; I shall now make use of a means, which wil prevail upon your spirit, and better perswade you than any other.
You know more than one Language; and among others you know the Hebrew, which I understand not. I shall tell you then, that a while ago, reflecting on that place of Scripture, where is described the work of the Fifth, and that of the Sixth Day, there appeared to me so great a difference betwixt the manner, in [Page 39] which the formation of Brutes, and that of Man was made, that I believed, what word soever was used in the Vulgar, there must be used very differing Expressions in the Hebrew.
I saw, that the Vulgar said, that the Beasts have a Living Soul, and that the same Translation used the same word to signifie the Life of Man: But I found withal, that besides that living Soul, which the Vulgar gives to Man, as it doth to Brutes, 'tis added, that Man was made to the Image of his Maker, whom I knew to be a pure Spirit. Whence I concluded, that since this Resemblance could not be drawn from the Body, the Creator having none, it must needs be taken from something of a superiour order, and, in a word, from the Spirit. To this I added, what the Vulgar expresseth, [Page 40] speaking of Man in the Second Chap. of Gen. Where I saw, that the Lord, who had made him a living Creature, as the Beasts, had breathed into him something which Beasts had not, and which, me thought, should be in him the Principle of a Life altogether different from theirs, and the cause of that advantageous resemblance, which he was to have with his Maker.
All these things did already sway much with me for the advantage of Man; but believing that I might yet better discover the sense of those places, by getting the Interpretation of the Hebrew, I consulted Monsieur de Compiegne, who is known to be the ablest we have in this Language. I prayed him to give me the Version of the first and second Chapter of Genesis; and in [Page 41] this Version I found the full proof of what I always thought, and of what M. Des Cartes had written on this Subject. For I saw, that in the place, which speaks of the Production of Fishes and other Brutes, where the Vulgar saith, Let the Waters and the Earth bring forth Living Souls, my Interpreter said, Let the Earth and the Water produce Living Individuals: which carrieth with it a very good sense, and expresseth the thing in a far more conceivable manner: For, it is very intelligible, that the Earth and Waters have produced living Individuals, that is, that they have been so fitted and disposed by the Almighty hand of the Lord, as to form Organical Bodies, which being fit for Nutrition and Motion (in which consists all the Life of Bodies) were [Page 42] to be called Living; but forasmuch as they could not be divided without being quite destroyed, were to be called Individuals.
Secondly, I see in the place which speaks of the formation of Man, that not only he was formed out of the Earth by the hands of the Lord, and that thereby he was become a Living Individual, as Beasts are; but above that, I see, that besides this Individual or Body Organick, which maketh him feed & move like Beasts, he hath received another thing, which my Interpreter calls Mens, and which I call Spirit, or Thought.
So that, as there is nothing spoken of a Soul for Plants in the Vulgar (as I have already observed) so there is neither in the Hebrew for Brutes. Neither is it [Page 43] said, that Brutes have Sense, (which I also desire you to note) but this only is said, that they have Life and Motion. And because this Life and this Motion do depend upon the disposition and correspondence of many Organs, the Division of which would hinder the effect; Moses, to signifie this Aggregate by one word, useth that of [...], which signifieth Individual.
But that, which we ought to consider above all, is, what the same sacred Writer so well declareth; That Man hath a Body organized as Brutes have, and that this Body liveth by the same Principles which give life to Brutes; that having said, that the Individuum of every Beast was produced by the Waters and the Earth, he saith, that that of Man was also produced of the [Page 44] Earth. And to make us understand, that this dust of the earth, which before was divisible without danger, was so disposed that it became an Individual, as every one of the other living bodies; he expresseth himself by the same word he used speaking of Beasts; and at the same time adds, that the Lord inspired into this living Individual, of which he would make a man, that which he expresseth by the word [...], that is, a Spirit, or Thought.
This seems to me so strong, that I think there can remain no more scruple about this point, viz. what we are to believe henceforth of Brutes and of Man. Moses hath given us clearly to understand, that Brutes live and move, because the Bloud and the contrivance of their Organs maketh of each of them an Individual [Page 45] Body, which remains fit for those two effects, as long as that contrivance lasts: And why should we attribute any other thing to them but this individual body, by which an accompt can be given of their Life and Motion?
But then, Moses saith not, that they have Sense. Why should we devise, that they have any? Or, at least, what danger is there to assert, that they have none?
Lastly, this Man, inspired by God, teacheth us, that the Brutes have nothing but what a Body may have, and that we have a body as they. But he adds, that we have besides a Spirit; or, if you will, a Soul, which we know is alone capable of having sense, of judging, of willing, and of all the other wayes of thinking. Why then should we not assert, that the brute Animals have nothing [Page 46] but Body, and that they have no sentiment? And why should we not affirm, that besides a body, like unto that which they have, (which maketh us not resemble our Maker) we have a Soul, which giveth us that admirable advantage to resemble him as much as a Creature is capable to do?
If after all this you shall still tell me, that the opinion of M. Des Cartes is dangerous, in that it maketh Brutes live and move without a soul; I shall answer you, that then the History of Moses is dangerous, forasmuch as it teacheth us the same thing.
But if, after you have seen, how well Moses doth separate that in Man, which maketh him live and move, from that which maketh him think, you shall examine, how the Creed of S. Athanasius, which we read every day [Page 47] as the Symbol of our Faith, defineth Man, you'l see, that he saith, that the Flesh, and the Rational Soul make all what he is: To which he adds, that, as these two substances, how different soever they be, constitute but one man; so God and Man make but one and the same Christ. But as in our Lord Jesus Christ it is not allowed, whatever the Union of his two Natures be, to confound them so, as to attribute to the one what comes from the other; so there is alwayes great danger to confound in Man the two Substances which do compose him, and the Functions which depend from each of them.
Those that give to the Body sentiment or other perceptions, which cannot belong but to the Soul, are subject to believe, that Man, as a Beast, hath nothing [Page 40] but Body. On the other hand, those who think, that the Soul is that which causeth Nutrition and Motion in Man, are liable to believe, that the Beasts, which feed and move, have a Soul as Man hath; and when there is no other difference betwixt Souls than that of more or less, there is an Axiom, which saying, That more or less changeth not the Essence, maketh, that Men will soon accustom themselves to believe, that if all perisheth in Beasts by death, there remains also nothing in Man, when he hath lost his Life.
As for me, I doubt not at all, but what hath been said of Vegetative and Sensitive Souls, which are attributed to Plants and to Beasts, hath made impious men believe, that those which are given to men, may be of the same nature.
[Page 49] If my Discourse were not too prolix already, I could explain to you the most wonderful operations of Brutes by the sole Construction of their Organs, as all the operations of a Watch are made out to you by the contrivance of its parts; and shew you, that there is no difference betwixt Artificial and Natural Engines, but in this, that the Author of Nature is a far more excellent Artist than Men are, and that he hath known to apply such parts to one another, as are much subtiler and much nimbler than those are of which we commonly compose our Machines. I could alse demonstrate to you, that there is nothing known to us in Brutes, even in the Ape it self, which may not be explicated from Bodies; and that in Man there are Thoughts, which all the [Page 50] diversities imaginable in Figures and Motions cannot give an accompt of. But I should exceed the Bounds I have prescribed to my self, and it sufficeth me to have shewed you, that M. Des Cartes hath alwayes followed Moses, to make you aver, that his Philosophy contains nothing dangerous.
Mean time I shall acknowledge, that the formation of the World according to M. Des Cartes, seems to have something different from that of Moses. But when you shall have considered the Design of the Prophet, and also that of the Philosopher, you will confess that this difference ought not to make us say, that they have receded from one another.
Moses hath delivered the thing as 'twas done. He saith, that God created the Earth, the Waters, [Page 51] the Celestial Parts, then the Light, and the rest; so that, when the Sun was created, the Earth was already inriched with Fruits, and adorned with Flowers. Whereas M. Des Cartes maketh the Sun the Cause, not only of the Fruits, and Flowers, but also of the gathering together of many inward parts of the Earth. The same also maketh the Earth to have been formed a long time after the Sun, although the Scripture noteth, that it was created before.
But here we are to take notice of 2 things: The one is, that M. Des Cartes hath said himself, that his Hypothesis was false in this, that he supposeth that the formation of each Being is made successivly; assuring, that this way not being so proper for God, we are to believe, that his Omnipotency hath [Page 52] put every thing in the most perfect condition it could be in, from the first moment of its production.
The other is, that M. Des Cartes was, like a Philosopher, to explicate only the reason, why things are conserved as they are, and the different effects we now admire in Nature. Now, as 'tis certain, that things are naturally conserved by the same means which hath produced them; so it was necessary for to find, whether the Laws, which he supposeth Nature follows to conserve her self, are true, that he should examine, whether the same Laws could have disposed it as now it is: And finding, that according to the History of Moses it self, although the Sun was formed after the Earth, it is yet by the Sun, that God conserveth the Earth as [Page 53] now it is, the heat thereof being cause of all the Productions and Changes therein; M. Des Cartes was to shew, that this same Sun could have put it into that state we now find it in, if the great Creator had not put it there in an instant by his Omnipotent power.
'Tis true indeed, that the manner, in which M. Des Cartes describeth, that the Sun hath disposed the Earth, is successive, which he acknowledgeth (as I have already noted) to be not so sutable to God in producing things: But however, as that which God doth in conserving the World, is successive, and must be so, that every thing may have a certain duration; it was proper for our Philosopher to examine, whether the Principles which he laid down to give an [Page 54] accompt of the duration of all Natural Beings, could have produced them by succession of time; which he hath done with an exactness, which seems to me incomparable. And so M. Des Cartes hath therein done nothing, contrary to the Design of Moses.
Moses knew, that 'tis by the Sun that God conserveth the Earth and the Natural Beings, those at least which are nearest unto us; but lest it should be thought, that that Luminary was the cause of all, he would have us know, that Light, which depends most of all from the Sun, was made before the Sun. And this was necessary to give notice of to those who were to know these Wonders, that God hath wrought them all by his sole will; and if he conserveth them now [Page 55] with a kind of mutual Dependency, yet they do not owe their Being nor their Conservation to one another, but to God alone.
M. Des Cartes on his part, being to explain that correspondence, which God hath put between the things of Nature, and being to give an accompt by the Sun of all that is done in that part of the World which is most known to men, could not better declare to us, how well the Sun is fitted and disposed by the First Power to maintain the natural state of all we see, than by shewing, that, following this same disposition, the Sun could have in progress of time put our World into the condition 'tis in, if it had not been more proper to form all the Creatures in an Order altogether contrary to that, which was required by the dependance [Page 56] that now is between them, and to produce each Being in a way, which might shew, that as the Author of the World had need of nothing to make all things, so he needed no time to bring forth any of the things we admire.
Lastly, If you consider, that that Wisdom, which put the first Man into his most perfect state from the first moment of his Production, did subject his Conservation to the same Laws, from which he hath made to depend the formation of those that are born of him, and that, for the right knowledge of the Nature of Man, it would be much more proper to examine the different Changes, which happen in the Seed from the time of Conception, unto the Birth of those that are generated, than to examine [Page 57] the miraculous formation of him, whom Omnipotency finish'd in beginning him; you will doubtless find, that for the well knowing, whether what is taught of the Laws, which conserve the order of Nature, be true, there is no better way, than to consider, whether those Laws could have produced the same.
I will not examine here, whether what is commonly believed of the stability of the Earth, is better explicated by the Hypothesis of M. Des Cartes, than by those which have preceded him.
Neither shall I examine, whether it be more true than others; himself hath said (as I have already noted) that it may be false. And certainly among an Infinity of ways, which God may use to make one and the same thing, it is difficult to assure, [Page 58] which that is he hath taken actually. But me thinks, that Men have reason to be content, when they have found one of them, which can give an accompt of all the Phaenomena, and is not contrary to what the H. Scripture and the Church propose to us. M. Des Cartes hath been so shy to advance any thing not conform to what they declare to us, that he hath expresly submitted to the one, what he seems to have wholly taken out of the other.
Thus whosoever shall read his Writings with the same Spirit, wherein he wrote them, will not be in any danger of being deceived, and will be alwayes ready to acknowledge his Errors, as soon as those that are to direct his Belief shall make him understand them. As for me, I am perswaded, that if we should condemn [Page 59] what M. Des Cartes hath written touching the manner in which the several Aspects of the Sun & the Earth are made, and that upon judging, it would not be a sufficient stability for the Earth, to remain always at rest in the midst of all the Celestial matter, which is found between the Body of the Moon and it, we should come to determine, that the Circle which M. Des Cartes makes all that matter run through in 1. year about the Sun, is contrary to what we ought to believe of the rest of the Earth; his greatest Followers, imitating his submission, would submit themselves first of all. For in short, as they know by evident Demonstrations, not only that 'tis God that is the Cause of the motion in the least portion of the Matter, but also that it is his Omnipotent hand which directs [Page 60] ordereth it throughout; it would be much more easie for them than others, to conceieve, that the same Hand can direct the Motions of the Sun, and of all the Celestial Matter about the Earth, so as it should not receive the least shaking from it.
For the rest, I think I cannot repeat too often, that M. Des Cartes hath not pretended, that his Hypothesis was true in all, and hath even acknowledged, that it was not so in certain things. But once more, I esteem, he had reason to think, that it was allowable for Men to make suppositions, and that they were all receivable, so they did satisfie all the Appearances, and were not contrary to Religion.
You'l find in some of his Letters, that he took much pains, when he was about to advance [Page 61] certain Propositions, to know, whether they had been condemned. It is by the Motives of this discreet apprehension, that he dedicated his Meditations to the Doctors of the Sorbon. And in short, it appears in his whole Conduct, that he would not for all the knowledge and Honour of the World, run the hazard of an Anathema. I must tell you also, that I think I know some of the best Wits, which are much addicted to his Tenets; and I know not one of them, that would not abandon them, if they had been condemned. I doubt, whether the same would be done by those that follow Aristotle, if his Opinions should be condemned anew: I say anew, because you know, that they have been so by the Laws, and even by a Council: And yet, although [Page 62] nothing have been changed since in the Canons about it, many think they may follow him notwithstanding. My chief Design is not to blame Aristotle; I intend only to justifie M. Des Cartes, and I think I have done it sufficiently, I am,