A reply to the excellent and elegant speech made by Sir Thomas Player, the worthy Chamberlain of London, to the Right Honble the Lord Mayor &c. on Friday the 12th of September, 1679 by H.B.

A reply to the excellent and elegant speech made by Sir Thomas Player, the worthy Chamberlain of London, to the Right Honble the Lord Mayor &c. on Friday the 12th of September, 1679 by H.B.

Table of contents

A REPLY TO The Excellent and Elegant SPEECH MADE BY Sir Thomas Player, The Worthy Chamberlain of London, To the Right Honble the Lord Mayor, &c. On Friday the 12th of September, 1679.

[Page]

[Page]

A REPLY TO The Excellent and Elegant SPEECH MADE BY Sir Thomas Player, The Worthy Chamberlain of London, To the Right Honble the Lord Mayor, &c. On Friday the 12th of September, 1679.

By H. B. an unworthy Member of the said Citie; but could not be heard or understood then.

MY LORD,

I Cannot but wonder at the manner as well as the subject matter of Sir T.P. his Discourse. As to the manner, I suppose he might have inform'd your Lordship and the Court of Aldermen of any danger the Citie were in, upon any account whatsoever, without bringing an hundred persons at his heels. I must take the boldness to tell him, that it lookt more like a tumultuous number of Apprentices doing execution upon Bawdie-houses, than any solid considerate way of advising good for the Citie or Kingdom. But I suppose the great Policie of that, might have Three Considerations: one, to shew that he is able to lead up his men: another, that he is able to make an excellent Speech: or thirdly, that he, for his great zeal and love to the Citie and Nation, was sollicited by those persons, out of their great fears and apprehensions of dangers partly created by himself.

[Page] I am very sorry that a Gentleman should have given occasion for any Citizen to have said so much: but any thing concerning his Highness had been received better from another hand than his, because of the known Grudge.

Next, as to the subject matter, he seems to be very much offended at the Citie's being Libell'd in the Intelligencer, by saying that the Citie should send to congratulate his Highness his return: As if it were such an immortal stain to the reputation of the Citie, never to be deleted! I wonder it was never taken notice of before. Had we congratulated him now, it had not been the first time. When he return'd from Sea, where he hazarded his life for the maintaining of our Trade, (which we are the gainers by) and had been in the heat of fight, where several Noble-men were killed about him, we could then congratulate him, as also did the Nation with a Present. He did not want Honour or Preferment, to do this for us. But we might have congratulated him, as he hath condescended to be a Member of us.

If his Highness had so much malice in him as to necessitate us to be upon our Guards in the nature proposed, surely he would never have ventur'd himself as a private Sea-man, for our service.

Neither can I conceive any such great danger of our Religion, since his Majestie is living, and well (God be thanked.) His Highness his Title may never happen. Besides, the Assembly of Parliament, and our Members there, will take care of us in that point.

We speak well of our King generally, although I am afraid there be some amongst us that are sorry they can't speak otherwise, to further their designes of enslaving us under a parcel of Factious and Ambitious fellows. And I hope there be yet persons sufficient amongst us (upon discovery of any such designes) to correct any sort of Faction against the King, Laws, and Established Government, whether Popish, or any other predominant [Page] among us: for neither the one nor the other (I am assured) consist with the Freedom of the Subject.

We cry out of Arbitrary Government, and I know not what besides, with which the Vulgar are amused: whilst we in our Government in the Citie are the most guilty of Arbitrariness in the execution of the Laws that we be Judges of, of any body else. For how many Thousand pounds per annum come into our Purses by a Knack of chusing Sheriffs, in making choice of persons whose occasions we know will not permit them to serve that Office; and then, to excuse them, we must have Four or five hundred pound apiece? with many suchlike Devices. And how many young Citizens have been undone by moneys paid for coming on of our Liveries; a Tax more considerable than twenty Publique Taxes for the support of the Government? These things, besides a great number more, we have and shall finde will lessen our Trade and Interest; else would not our houses stand unlet, and our shops be uncustom'd.

When the King had thanked us for our Care in raising the Militia, and making the Citie a Garison, for the preservation of his person; His Majestie told us he would take care of himself, yet this would not make us lay down our Arms. Nor do I know by what Law the Lieutenancie there can make us keep them up. 'Tis true, the Lieutenancie themselves, or we that are the principal men, value not the Charge, being little to us, in comparison of what it is to the poor Trades-men, who had more need be minding their business, than they or their servants so employed, to the debauchery of the youth of the Citie. And many of those mean persons that are forced to be at this intolerable charge, will be fit for nothing, but to give assistance in any new Rebellion.

And if you please to peruse the Statutes for setling the Militia, 13 Car. 2. cap. 6. 14 Car. 2. cap. 3. you'll finde there how our Trained Bands are to be marshal'd: That in case of Invasion or Insurrection, every Souldier is to be [Page] provided of one Months pay; but no person to be charged further, until the said Months pay be reimbursed him. And in times of peace, the General Muster and Exercise of Regiments not to be above once a year. That the Training and Exercising single Companies be not above four times a year, unless upon special Direction by the King or Privie Council; and the same not to continue above two days, &c. These Acts were made with abundance of Consideration for the Liberty of the Subject, that the King should not lay any extraordinary burden upon our estates, upon any pretence whatsoever. And I wonder how it hath been submitted unto by our pretence of Authority so long, being absolutely against Law.

It's impossible for us to thrive in the Citie, whilst we amuse our selves with these kinde of Fears. Let us trust God and the King with the Government: let's mend our selves at home, and endeavour to encourage and increase the Trade of the Citie. When the King or Government is in danger, we shall hear of it time enough: or if the King hath a minde to make us of his Privie Council, he knows his own time for it. Certainly the King hath more to lose than any of us.

I must refer it to your Lordships consideration, whether we ought to take notice of this Intelligencer as a Libeller or not; and also whether there be occasion for any Guards at all, for the considerations aforesaid.

FINIS.

[Page]

Information about this book

Title statement

A reply to the excellent and elegant speech made by Sir Thomas Player, the worthy Chamberlain of London, to the Right Honble the Lord Mayor &c. on Friday the 12th of September, 1679 by H.B.

H. B.

Edition statement

1679

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2009-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A30922

ID [STC]

Wing B77

ID [STC]

ESTC R28327

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

10526080

ID [OCLC]

ocm 10526080

ID [VID]

45203

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A30922)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 45203)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1394:35)

Source

— A reply to the excellent and elegant speech made by Sir Thomas Player, the worthy Chamberlain of London, to the Right Honble the Lord Mayor &c. on Friday the 12th of September, 1679 by H.B., H. B., Player, Thomas, Sir, d. 1686..

Extent

4 p.

s.n.,. [London :: 1679]. (Caption title.) (Published also under title: An answer to the excellent and elegant speech made by Sir Thomas Player.) (Reproduction of original in the Harvard University Library.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.