A Discourse concerning Astrology.
CHAP. I.
Of the Original thereof.
THat Astrology, which in our days by its being mixt with so many Superstitious Fopperies, is become suspicious and almost Ridiculous, was at the first a thing of great Value, and worthy of the greatest consideration, may be concluded from the acceptance it found with the most Famous men in the very Infancy of the World; we may ascertain our [Page 70] selves, that it was in use before the Deluge, from Genesis 18, where 'tis said that Noah enterd the Ark on the seventeenth day of the second Month, and came out again (the Waters being gone from the face of the Earth) upon the 27th. day of the second Month, in the year following. That it is of great Antiquity cannot be denied, but who was the first Author of it is uncertain: yet its Credible that it begun at Adam, and was continued by his son Seth, and Communicated to Posterity; in reference to which Opinion, is the Story of Seth's Pillars; which Pillars were made (by reason of what they had heard from Adam, (viz.) that the World should be Twice destroyed, once by Water, and afterwards by Fire) to preserve the Sciences to them that were to replenish the Earth after the Deluge. One of which Pillars was remaining in Iosephus his time, as himself Testifies, in lib. Antiq. [Page 71] cap. 11. [...]. But whether this of the Pillars be Fabulous or no, it matters not; it is probable enough that it was found by the Ancients before the Floud, whose Lives usually extended to some Hundreds of years, a thing very requisite to the perfection of Astrology; nor was it (considered in its purity) a Study unbeseeming those Noble Spirits. In favour of this Opinion may be alledged that of Iosephus in cap. 7. lib. 1. that Enoch left a Treatise of Astrology, or (Astrology being taken after the Modern distinction) of Astronomy; which Treatise is yet extant in the Kingdom of the Queen of Sheba. Tertullian quotes it in the 4th. and 15th. Books de Idololatriâ, and in the Book De habitu muliebri. cap. 3. where he proves by many Arguments, that those Books are not spurious; and answers the Objections that may be brought against it. Now although the Testimony [Page 72] of so Learned a man as Tertullian, may stop the Mouths of all such as out of Sceptical humour may doubt the verity of what has been said; yet considering the great propension of some in our days, to overthrow what ever sound Doctrine has been Taught by the Seniors, aswell in Knowledge as in years, I shall endeavour to prove the Antiquity of this most Noble Science by force of reason.
1. 'Tis not to be doubted that Adam, both by reason of his Converse with Angels, and his great insight into the Intellectual world; as also by his great knowledge of this visible world, which render'd him capable of distinguishing things, and giving a name sutable to the Nature of each thing; could understand the Nature of the Heavens, and those splendid Bodies there placed. So that if the Beauties of those Caelestial Bodies were Created to be subservient and significant to the Microcosm, it is most certain, that [Page 73] the first Father of Mankind, understood it.
2. The Wise and ever-True God, who has made every thing good, and made nothing that was not to be of some use to man, did certainly never design that Glorious and Resplendent part of the World, to be for a Gazingstock only, and not have operation or influence in the Universe; but to be a general Moderator, and Govenor of the most material Actions of Mortal Bodies; as he has reserved to himself the disposing of that pure substance Mans Soul. And such was his love to Mankind, that he would Teach a way whereby they might recover part of that Knowledge was lost in the first Mans Fall and Disobedience. And so that they might not be altogether involved in Darkness, and obscurity of what was to come, he Taught them to Read in that Great Volume, the Chief Contingencies of their Life.
That what I say is probable, and [Page 74] not an Idle Whimsey of some Melancholick Brain, is Manifest from the common Opinion of Learned Men among the Iews, Greeks, and Latines, and others, who call the Heavens a Sacred Book, wherein by those Capital Letters (the Stars) may be read the Events of things below. The Learned Origen, upon this place of Genesis, Et erunt in signa, Affirms, that the Stars were placed in this Order in the Heavens for no other end, but to shew, by their diverse Aspects and Figures, whatever is to happen while the World indures, aswell in general as in particular; yet not so, as that they were the Causes of all these things: never any such thing came into the Thoughts, much less into the Writings of this Learned Man. For as the Prophecies that are Written in Books, are not the Causes of those Events, which they foretel shall happen, but only the Signs; so may the Heavens be (says he) very justly [Page 75] called a Book, wherein God hath Written, all that is, hath been, and hereafter shall be. And for Confirmation Cites a Passage out of a Book called, Narratio Ioseph, wherein the Patriarch Iacob, giving his Blessing to all his Children, upon his Death-bed, says, Legi in Tabulis Coeli, quaecun (que) contingent vobis & Filijs vestris: whence the same Origen concludes on this Question, Vtrum Stellae aliquid agant? That some Mysteries may be assuredly Read in the Heavens; by reason that the Stars are disposed and Ordered there in the Form of Characters. Iulius Syrenus has undertaken the Defence of this Doctrine, and holds it a most safe and true Opinion. St. Augustine lib. 2. contra Manichaeos, cap. 2. has this Expression; Ne (que) in illis corporibus Caelestibus hic latere posse Cogitationes credendum est, quemadmodum in his corporibus latent; sed sicut nonnulli motus animorum apparent in Vultu, & maximè in oculis, sic in [Page 76] illâ perspicuitate ac simplicitate Caelestium corporum, omnes motus animi latere arbitror. All the Platonists in a manner were likewise of the same Persuasion, and this is the reason that Porphyrie assures us, that when he had resolved to have killed himself, Plotinus who had Read his intention in the Stars, hindered him from doing it. To the same purpose is that of Orpheus,
Amongst the Modern men, Flud has this expression in his Apology for the Rosie Cross men, In Coelo (inquit) inserti & impressi hujusmodi Characteres, qui non aliter ex Stellarum ordinibus conflantur, quàm lineae Geometricae, & Literae Vulgares ex punctis, [Page 77] superficies ex lineis, Corpus ex superficiebus.
Postellus gives us this account of his own Experience in this matter, in these words; Si dixero me in Coelo vidisse, in ipsis Linguae Sanctae Characteribus, ab Esrâ primum publicè expositis, ea omnia quae sunt in rerum naturâ constituta; ut vidi non explicitè, sed implicitè; vix ullus mihi crediderit: tamen testis Deus, & Christus ejus, quia non mentior.
After the Deluge, and the scattering abroad of the Nations through the whole Earth, the Study of Astrology was likewise Dilated, and become common to many Nations: so that they not only Vied one with another in the accurateness and perfection of Skill, but also about the Invention of it; every one desiring to ascribe the Invention of so Noble a Science to their own Country: but 'tis most probable, nay in a manner certain, that they of Asia, (considering [Page 78] that Adam was there made, and that Noahs Arks rested upon a Mountain in that part of the world, from whom the Face of the whole Earth was Inhabited) were they who first improved this Study. Nor is it reasonable to think that the Asians, who were setled in a Residence, and had both Motives and Opportunities enough, should let the Africans or Europoeans outstrip them in the Invention of Arts, who were Cumbered for many years in finding out convenient Habitations, and in defending themselves from the Incursions of their troublesome Neighbours.
Amongst the Asians the Chaldaeans Challenge Priority in this mater, and glory of instructing other Nations herein, according to which is that of Herodotus in Euterpe: [...]. i. e. The Graecians Learned of the Babylonians or Chaldeans the Doctrine of the Poles, [Page 79] and of dividing the Day into Twelve parts. Likewise Didorus Siculus in the Third Book of Antiquities, Testifies of the Chaldaeans, that by long observation of the Course of the Stars, they found out their Nature, and Foretold things that were afterwards to come to pass; Tully likewise in primo de Divinatione; Principio (inquit) Assyrij, ut ab ultimis auctoribus repetam, propter planitiem magnitudinem (que) regionum, quas incolebant, cum Caelum omni ex parte patens, at (que) apertum intuerentur, trajectiones, motus (que) Stellarum observaverunt. Nor is it meet that we forget Abraham, a man so highly approved of by God, who was a Chaldaean, and the Chief Astrologer of the East, of whom Berosus, as Eusebius says, spoke in this manner, [...]. Decimâ vero post Diluvium generatione apud Chaldaeos erat vir justus, & magnus, & Coelestium [Page 80] habens experientiam. i. e. in the Tenth Generation after the Floud there was amongst the Chaldaeans, a Just and Great Man, one well skill'd in the Heavens; which no doubt is meant of Abraham, who was so Famous in respect of the great sway he bore as a Nobleman; but more especially for his Piety, and Sober manner of Living, and his Miraculous and Conspicuous Preservation in all Dangers, by the immediate hand of Providence. Abraham Learn'd of his Father Thare or Terah, which is the Opinion of Philo in his Book of Nobility, where he Writes thus of Abraham, and his Father Thare, [...]. Primus Parens Iudaeorum Chaldaeus erat Natione, Patre prognatus dedito syderali Scientiae, uno ex ijs, qui circa Mathesin versarentur. Where by [...] is meant Thare the Father of Abraham.
[Page 81] Now although we ought to look upon the Chaldaeans as the First and most Eminent in this Faculty, yet we are not to look upon them as the sole Monopolists of Sydereal knowledge; the Bactrians will put in for a share, and say, that though they did not first lay down the Rules, yet they improved them as high as any; Witness their so famous Zoroaster, who as Iustin tells us, in lib. primo Epitomes Trogi, Primus Magicas Artes dicitur invenisse, & mundi principia, Siderum (que) motus diligenter observasse: and was doubtless as expert in this Reading the Starry Book, as the greatest Chaldaean of them all.
The Aegyptians Learned from the Assyrians, and had the same convenience for the Business; that is, a plain Champaign Country, and an Air seldom or never Overcast with Clouds, or Vapours to hinder the Eye from Viewing the Motions of those Glorious Bodies. 'Tis the Opinion of [Page 82] Vossius in his Book De quatuor artibus popularibus, That Abraham brought it amongst them when he Travelled into that Country; but however it was, they proved so good Proficients, as to invite the Graecians to come into their Schools for Instructions in this, and other curious Arts, as Theon Alexandrinus upon Aratus his [...] tells us, [...]: i. e. The Graecians received these Arts from the Aegyptians and Chaldaeans. And as Pride is still Fatal to great Parts, the Aegyptians puffed up with their Learning began to be Ungrateful, and Kick at their Masters the Chaldaeans, they thought themselves more Skilful, and would have the Credit of Invention to themselves; on their side was Diodorus Siculus, who to make the Story Plausible Affirms, that Babylon is a Colony of the Aegyptians, first Planted by Belus the Son of Neptune and Lybie, who Erected a [Page 83] Colledg in Babylon, and set Scholars therein to Study Astrology, as they did in Aegypt. Yet Diodorus Siculus is to be suspected, as being too great a Favourer of the Aegyptians; and another thing which makes this Opinion Invalid is, that the Egyptians can produce no Observations before Alexander the Great; whereas the Chaldoeans can prove theirs to be of far greater Antiquity.
The Arabians too were Skill'd in Astrology, as may be gathered from Chap. 9. verse 9. of Iob, where mention is made of the Pleiades, Orion, and Arcturus.
The Aethiopians were not ignorant of the Stars and their different influences, for which they were beholding to Atlas King of Mauritania, who is said to have Lived about the time of Ioseph the Patriarch, or as others, about the time of Moses; and was so excellent in this Study, that the Poets Feigned him to bear up Heaven with [Page 84] his Shoulders. Having Traced Astrology through Asia and Africa; we will now bear it company into Europe, and see, by whom it was first Taught in this Part of the world, which is not inferior to the other for curious knowledge.
Though Learning be never more Disturbed and Eclypsed, than where a Country is embroyled in War, Mars his Drum being too obstreperous for the sweet lays of the Muses, yet 'tis observable that it follows the Victor, and delights to fix her Seat where the Sword has drawn a place of Defence to secure her from the Affronts of those that desire to enjoy the Liberties and conveniences others have in Lawful Possession.
It was then Learning began to flourish in Greece, when they had by their Prowess awed those that before Lorded it over them. And though it may be observed, that they were not altogether ignorant in Astrology, but [Page 85] had some Glimpses thereof at the time of the Trojan War, from Homers telling, how Achilles his Armour had Stars Engraven on it by Vulcan; as also from the Story of Endymions being Loved by the Moon, which was occasioned from his Observations concerning the Moon; as also Phaethons Guiding the Chariot of the Sun, from the like occasion: the Stories of Orion, and Perseus, and Orpheus his Harp, being made Stars, all which only intimate unto us, their skill in the Course of the Stars; yet 'twas never improved to any considerable height till Thales. Before his time, they had only so much knowledge therein, as to know the Seasons of the year, and the Rising and Setting of some remarkable Stars; such an Astrologer was Hesiod, and such Plato calls [...], men only indued with the little Rudiments, and unacquainted with that accurateness which Thales brought in; of [Page 86] whom Diogenes Laertius gives this account in Vitâ Thaletis; [...]. i. e. most are of opinion that Thales was the first that Studied Astrology (in Greece) and observed the Course of the Sun, and Taught the reason of the Eclypses, as Eudemus says in his Astrological History. Anaximander Milesius was the Scholar of Thales; he Taught that the Earth was the Center of the World, and that it was Round, observed the Tropicks, and Equinoctials, and Taught to know the hours by the shadow of a Gnomon. Scholar to Anaximander was Anaximenes Milesius, who found that the Moon borrowed her Light, and that the Interposition of the Earth betwixt her and the Sun, was the Cause of her several Phases.
After Anaximines, was Anaxagoras Clazomenius, who Taught that the [Page 87] Moon had in it Hills, and Valleys like the Earth, and that it was Habitable; that the Milky-way was made by the Reflection of the Sun-beams; that Comets are a Mass of Sparkles, proceeding from the Stars by reason of their Swift Motion, Collected into one Body; that the Sun was a Round, Fiery-Ball, Bigger than all Peloponnesus; that the Heavens consisted of Stones, which yet do not Fall, by reason of that extraordinary Circumgyration. In the second year of the Seventy Eight Olympiad he foretold, that one of those Stones should Fall from Heaven, which (they say) came to pass by the River Aegos in Thrace; how much he was addicted to the Study of Astrology, may be gathered from this; One asking wherefore he was Born, he Answer'd, to Contemplate the Sun, and Moon, and the Heavens; to another, Rebuking him for neglecting his Temporal Affairs, and asking him if he did not care for [Page 88] his Country, he said, Yes I do, (pointing with his Finger towards Heaven) that is my Country.
Pythagoras is accounted Chief of the Italian Sect, and Taught in Italy at the same time as Anaximenes did at Miletum: he is said to have first observed the Obliquity of the Eclyptick; he Taught that the Earth moved about the Sun, betwixt Mars and Venus. After him was Democritus the Abderite, and Empedocles Agrigentinus. About the first year of the Eighty Seventh Olympiad flourished Meton, the Son of Panthias, who Corrected the Calendar, and found out the Circulum decennovennalem, which we call the Golden Number; of whom Festius Avienus.
Whereby is meant that Meton added Ten years to the Computation of Harpalus, who made Tables for Eight years only. This period of Nineteen years was approved of by Euctemon and Philippus, as best reconciling the Differences in the Sun and Moons Revolutions. Eudoxus the Son of Aeschines a Cnydian, a Famous Geometrician and Astrologer, opposed the Period found by Meton, by one of Eight years, but to no purpose.
The Multitude of Commentators upon Aratus, will not permit me to leave him out of the Roll; he Wrote in Verse the time of the Rising, and Setting of the Stars, and gave Rules to know what Temperatures of Air would be upon the different Aspects and Positions of the Heavenly Bodies.
[Page 90] About the time of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus, Conon Flourished, who Collected the Eclypses of the Sun and Moon; and it was he that first gave Notice of the Star called Berenices Hair, as Catullus says in his Poem de comâ Berenices.
About Ten years after him, that is, about the Hundred and Fortieth Olympiad, Aristarchus Samius was Famous for his skill; he followed the Opinion of Pythagoras, Philolaus, and those who held the Motion of the Earth. About the same time Flourished the Famous Archimedes, who made the Flying Dove, and the Artificial [Page 91] Sphere, wherein were Motions answerable to that of the Caelestial Bodies, the Artificial Planets keeping Correspondence with the Natural.
The Study of the Stars being now grown to a considerable height, wanted not Admirers in all the succeeding Ages, who imployed their Parts and Indeavours in these Speculations; and by their Industry and good Fortune, dayly added to the perfection of this Art: It were easie for me to give you their Names in Order, as they appeared to the world, to these very times: but that not being so necessary, I shall only speak something of the Progress it had, after the Decay of the Graecian Monarchy, and then proceed to my intended Discourse against the Defamers, and Blots to this Noble Science, the Judicial Astrologers.
I begin with Alcuinus, otherwise call'd Flaccus Albinus; not that he was the first, who deserved to be taken [Page 92] Notice of, but for Brevity; considering it would Swell my Volume to too large a Bulk to name them all. He was Born in England, a Yorkshire-Man, and was made Deacon in the days of Offa King of the Mercians, and was by him, for his great Learning, but especially for his skill in the Mathematical Studies, sent over to Charles the Great, and was by him Honourably received, and staid with him in France. He got a Grant for an University at Paris, and Taught the Liberal Sciences there. He Read Astronomy to Charles the Great, and shew'd him the use of an Ephemeris: 'twas he gave the German Names to the Winds, by which our seamen at this day call them.
This Kings being delighted so much with Astronomy, brought him into a good Esteem with the then King of Persia, who was addicted the same way, and sent him a Dial for the Planets, which was no less pleasant [Page 93] for the Favour, than useful for the Ingenuity of it.
Not long after lived Maimon King of the Saracens, who caused Ptolomies System to be brought in again, after it had been a long time neglected. And Contemporary with him, was the Famous Albumassar the Arabian.
In the year One Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty, flourished Marsilius Ficinus, at first a great Favourer of Judicial Astrology; but afterwards Reading that Excellent Treatise of Picus Mirandula's, concerning that Subject, he Recanted, being convinced of the Fopperies thereof by the reasons of so Learned a Man. He was a Great man in all Learning, but an especial Admirer of Plato's Philosophy.
In the year One Thousand Five Hundred flourished Abraham Zacuti, Mathematician to Emanuel King of Portugal; he left a perpetual Almanack for the Revolutions of all the Stars.
[Page 94] From the year of Christ One Thousand and Five Hundred, Mathematical Studies grew so Universal, and well known in the Christian World, that it is impossible to Rank them in their Order, the Multiplicity of Students bringing Confusion into the History. I shall only therefore speak of the most Renowned. And first, with Ioannes Wernerus a German, who was a most exact Observer of the Starry Motions; he Wrote two Books of the Motion of the Eighth Sphere.
Contemporary with him was Ioannes Blanchinus, and about sixteen years after was Ioannes Staeflerus; he Taught the way to make an Astrolabe, and Wrote Commentaries upon Proclus his Sphere; he was sometimes Master to Philip Melancthon, and inflamed that Learned man with such a Love to Mathematicks, as endured to his very Death. After him was Henricus Baersius, and Iohn Cario, [Page 95] both very Eminent men, of which the first Wrote a Book of the Composition, and use of the Quadrant, the other of Practical Astrology, and Ephimeredes for many years.
In the year One Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Six, Nicolaus Copernicus became Eminent, one who revived many Opinions that had for a long time been Buried in obscurity; of whom Ismael Bulialdus in his Prolegomena's to Phylosophical Astronomy, gives this Character, Nicolaus Copernicus vir absolutae subtilitatis, non solum observator fuit, sed etiam Hypotheseos Pythagoricae antiquae instaurator. Per eum enim ex humanis cogitationibus exemptoe Ptolomaicarum Hypotheseon tricae, & circulorum multiplicium involutiones, & ad Physicam simplicitatem revocatae sunt hominum mentes.
After him was Petrus Apianus, Lucas Gauricus a Neopolitan, and Ioachinus Fortius Rithenbergius, commonly [Page 96] called Sterck, who lived at the same time with Erasmus Roterodamus; and was first moved to apply himself to study, by Conversing with Erasmus, and more particularly (as himself Confesses) by Reading that little Treatise De ratione studij.
In the year of Christ One Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty, Lived Gerardus Mercator, a man well Read in Astrology.
Many others there are, whom it is needless to insert, not that they were less deserving than others, but because these I have mentioned may serve to shew by whom, and at what times this Science has been propagated.
And though some may object, that I go against my self in thus playing the Herald, and reckoning the Ancestors of Astrology; and that it had been more advantageous to my Cause to have sought to have proved, that none of Ingenuity or Learning had ever studied in these matters: yet let [Page 97] them know, that it makes much for me upon Consideration, that none of these ever descended to these Nonsensical Fopperies, wherewith Judicial Astrology is stuffed full, and which has brought into Question the more material points of the Heavenly Reading. Nor have these Fortune-tellers any more reason to boast, that so many Worthy men have imployed themselves in Contemplating the Starry Bodies, than the Romanists to boast of St. Peter, and the Apostles Doctrine, forasmuch as both of them have lost their Art and Religion with Superstition and Fopperies.
CHAP. II.
A Discourse concerning Iudicial Astrology.
THat Curiosity is the Epidemick Disease of the Mind, every man may Experience in himself, and [Page 98] observe in others, which if it was not so, there had been no occasion of the present Discourse. Yet forasmuch as through the Impudent Rashness of some, and the Serious simplicity of others, not only the Stars, but also the Votes and Desires of men are reduced into an Art, and made (against their own Nature) Foretellers of future Contingencies; it will not be, I hope, impertinent to our present purpose, to Discusse the Business, and to Search out what Solidity and Truth there is in their Opinions and Tenets. Which that we may do, I shall reduce my Discourse to Three Heads.
1. A proposal of their Principles, who are persuaded of the Omniscience of the Stars, and have given up their Votes for Judicial Astrology.
2. An Examination of those Principles; to see how their Principles accord with reason.
3. A Confutation of their False and Erroneous Opinions, not only in the [Page 99] smaller Deductions and Conclusions, but also in the very Fundamentals.
Of which I do not intent to make a long Treatise, but only briefly to Touch at the foresaid Method, and so have done.
Grand Patrons and Favourites of the affirmative (I mean Sticklers for Judicial Astrology) were the Priscillianists, spawned from the Gnosticks; who amongst other their prodigious Errours had this, that the Stars had especial and supreme Influence and Predominance over man, and Taught, that the several parts of his Body were in Subordination to the Twelve Constellations: Assigning to the Head Aries, Taurus to the Neck, Gemini to the Shoulders, and so of the rest, as you may be informed from every Almanack Writer, affirming that in good Earnest, which the Poets only spoke Allegorically, or rather Poeticà Licentiâ; introducing Old Atlas with [Page 100] the Heavens on his Shoulders, and his Body finely Spangled with Stars.
But to proceed to our present purpose; their main Arguments, and Strong Cables, the Homerick Chains wherewith they would Pull down Iupiter and the rest of the Stars to the very Earth, and imploy them as Link-boys, to direct us in our very Pilgrimage here upon Earth, are reducible to these Heads.
1. To places of Scripture, seeming to make for their purpose.
2. To reasons which they bring to make good their party.
3. To Experiments and Observations, by which they would expect Credit and consent to their Art.
First for places of Scripture. Those that are most urged by them are Genesis 1. 14. where its said, Luminaria caelestia a Deo posita esse in signa. Iudges. That the Stars fought against Sisera in their courses. Also [Page 101] Iob 38 31. Canst thou bind the sweet influences of the Pleiades? or loose the bands of Orion? Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season, or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons? Knowest thou the Ordinances of Heaven? Canst thou set the Dominion thereof in the Earth?
That likewise Psalm the 19. 1. The Heavens declare the glory of God, and the Firmament sheweth his handy-work. And above all, that of the Star which appeared to the Wise-men or Magi, who came to see Christ; from all which places they would conclude, that the Stars are Signs of Future Events, and that diversly, according to their several Aspects, Conjunctions, and Oppositions.
The second Rank of Arguments, are such as are drawn from reason, which they Form on this manner, as First,
That there can be no other reason given of the vast number of Wandring-Stars.
[Page 102] 2. There can be no reason given of the several Motions, so many Conjunctions, Oppositions, Trines and Quartiles, or why a Planet (suppose) should be sometimes in one Sign, sometimes in another, now exalted in his Dignities in his own house in full force and power, again sneaking amongst his Enemies in some Constellation, clearly contrary to his own Natural Inclination; or why two or three Planets meeting at the Bull, or Ram, or any other Sign, should be very Civil and Sober, and all agree to one thing; and on a sudden (no body knows for what) fall out and come to Daggers drawing.
3. They say there is a strict Coherence, and Bond of Amity betwixt the Caelestial and Sublunary Bodies; that the Stars have certain Influences upon the Bodies of men, which prevail more or less according to their divers Positions: for example, that those who are Born in the Interlunium, [Page 103] should be weak and subject to Diseases; and that those who are Born when the Moon is in Conjunction with Malevolent ill-natur'd Planets, do either die presently, or are troubled with Epilepsies at the New-Moons: that Physicians observe some Diseases to increase or abate according to the several Aspects and Positure of the Moon with other Stars. They reason further, that considering it is undeniable that the Stars have influence over the Elements, it should be absurd to deny that man is exempt from that Influence, since he does infallibly Participate of the Nature and Quality of the Elements; this is for the Body. That they Swagger over his Mind too, they Argue thus; The inclinations of the Mind follow the Temperature of the Body, and that Temperature of the Body is altered and disposed of by the Elements, the Elements by the Caelestial Bodies, therefore 'tis certain, that one may judge of the Manners [Page 104] and Inclinations of men by the Stars.
Another reason they bring, is from the Author of Astrology, who (as they say) was Seth, and his Children, and that he, by reason of what he had heard from Adam concerning the Two-fold Destruction of the World, Wrote the Fundamentals and Principles of this Science on two Pillars, the one of Brick, and the other of Stone; as also that Moses and Daniel were skill'd in all the Learning of the Aegyptians and Chaldaeans, and were not reprehended for it from the Mouth of God.
The last File to patch up a plausible Toleration for Judicial Astrology is, from Experiments and Observations Collected by Practitioners, and Recorded by Historians of very good Credit and Authority.
The first is that of Iulius Caesar, Written by Suetonius, who being Warned by an Astrologer, to beware of the Ides of March, and the time [Page 105] being come, and seeing no danger, as the prediction seemed to signifie, he jeered the Artist, telling him that the Ides were come; who answer'd, They were indeed come, but not past, and the very same day was Caesar Stab'd in the Senat-house, and dyed of two and thirty Wounds. At the Nativity of Augustus, Publius Nigidius who had calculated it, cryed out, that the Lord of the whole Earth was then born, which made Augustus favour the Astrologers ever after, and caused the Image of a Goat to be set upon his Coin, being born under that Sign.
Thrasillus and Tyberius walking together the Emperour design'd to have thrown him down a steep place, and have slain him, but he coming near the place begun to tremble, look pale, and shew divers Signs of horrour and amazment; which being observed by the Emperour, he asked what was the matter: the Astrologer [Page 106] answer'd, He perceived some great danger very near him; hereupon the Emperor relented, and forbore to execute his Tragical Design.
Vitellius being yet a Private man, the Astrologers told him he should be Emperor, and afterwards told him the day of his Death; for the Emperor being displeased with the Astrologers, commanded they should all depart out of Italy by such a day: they cast out a Paper or Libel, wherein they desired him not to trouble himself with their going out of Italy on that day, for he should then go out of the world; which according to their Praedictions proved true.
Xiphilinus in vitâ Neronis, Relates that when Nero was Born, the Astrologers foretold that he should be Emperor, and slay his Mother, which also came to pass.
Many other Experiments may be brought for the Credit of Astrologers, which I shall not set down, to avoid [Page 107] Prolixity; who has a mind to know them, may Consult Latin Authors, and find to their Content: these being of most Validity I have taken Notice of, partly engaged thereunto by my proposed Method, and partly to avoid the Censure of the adverse party, who might else have complained of Foul-play. That we may in short lay down what is to be thought of this Art in general, and its Fundamentals, we must make a distinction between certainties and uncertainties, distinguishing them both from what is manifestly False, and examine what power the Stars have over inferior sublunary Bodies, how far this Art extends it self; and what is beyond the Reach both of the Stars and Astrologers, and so we may come to know, what Praedictions may be certainly had from the Heavens, what only probably, and what cannot be known at all.
From the Stars, especially from [Page 108] the Sun and Moon, may be known the Succession of Day and Night, the Four-fold Distinction of the year, Remarkable Alterations and Changes of Weather, as Winds, Rain, Tempests, &c.
Also it cannot be denied, that the Caelestial Bodies have their Influence and Operation upon the Elements, especially upon the Air, so as to make it sometimes Healthful and Sweet, sometimes Noxious and Destructive. Also that there several things, which have a particular dependance upon the Moon, and those not only Vegetatives, but also Men, as may be observed from those we call Lunaticks, which is thus effected. The Devil who is of great Experience and Subtlety, Chooses those times for the Disturbance of such persons, when the humours flow abundantly in the Body (occasioned by the Course of the Moon) and so insinuating himself into the humour, easily Disturbs the Imagination.
[Page 109] Astrologers may also give certain information of the Periods and Motions of the Caelestial Orbs, the distances, Rising and Setting of the Stars; the Conjunctions, Oppositions, and other Aspects, of the Eclypses of the Sun and Moon, because those things depend upon the Regular and necessary Course of Nature.
Amongst those things which are only probable, and Contingent or to be Guest at, are particular alterations in the Air, Collected from the observation of certain Changes, usually attending such an Aspect of the Planets, as also Epidemical Diseases; all which are only Contingent, because there may, besides those general and remote Causes (I mean the positure of the Stars,) occur several more immedate Causes, which may disturb the iotherwise-natural Effects. Such are the Interposition of some Star in the Aspect observed of a contrary Nature, not known of by the Astrologer; the [Page 110] different Qualities of Countreys, and the diverse Temperatures of the Air, which may abate the Influence, and perhaps change the Nature of the Effect.
If Astrologers Err so frequently in their Praedictions of the Weather, and other things which depend upon Natural Causes, we may-confidently affirm, that those things which depend meerly at the will and pleasure of man, are such, as Astrologers cannot at all judge of.
To shew the vanity and idleness of this Science, I shall make use of Authority, both Divine and Humane, 2. Reason, and 3dly. their own False Observations and Praedictions.
As for Divine Authority, no greater Argument can be brought against it, than that it is so often spoken against in Holy Scriptures, as in Numb. 23. 22. where all manner of Divination is forbidden, inquiring after that which is to come is forbidden, Prov. 27. [Page 111] Eccles. 8. 6. God by his Prophet Esaiah Taxes the vanity of this Art, and of those that are Deluded by them, Esai. 47. 12. 13. Stand now (says he) with thy Enchantments, and with the multitude of thy Sorceries, wherein thou hast laboured from thy Youth; if thou shalt be able to profit, if so be thou maist prevail. Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy Counsels: let now the Astrologers, the; Star-gazers, the monthly Prognosticators stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee. God likewise commands the Israelites, that they Learn not the ways of the Gentiles, and that they be not afraid of the Signs of heaven, which the Gentiles fear. God threatens Confusion, Folly, and Destruction to such like, Esai. 44. 20.
Next come the Ancient Fathers, who subscribe to the Authority of the Scriptures, and vote down this way of Divination; out of whose Writings many things tending to this purpose may be gathered.
[Page 112] Nay so unreasonable and Prophane has this Science always been accounted that (except a few Brainsick persons, who have practised it) it has been condemned by most Grave and Judicious men, and by the Edicts of several Heathen aswell as Christian Emperours, as also by General-Councils; see the Acts of the first General-Council of Toledo, in which the Priscillianists (as I said before) great Favourers of this Art were Condemned and Excommunicated. Nor did this sort of men fare better with the Emperors; they were Banished the City by Augustus; Expelled out of Italy first by Tiberius, afterwards by Claudius; afterwards by Vitellius they were Sentenced to Death: twice by Domitian were they Banish'd out of Italy, as being a sort of men Treacherous to Princes, and Faithless to those that Trusted in them. There is also (which ought to have been named first) a Law made by Caesar to this purpose, [Page 113] If any Magician, or Conjurer, or Soothsayer, or Mathematician, or Interpreter of Dreams be taken within my Iurisdiction, let him suffer Punishment; but if he be Convict, and continue obstinate, let him be Wrackt, and Lanced according to his Desert.
Likewise 'twas Decreed by Honorius and Theodosius the Emperours, that the Books of the Mathematicians should be Burnt in the presence of the Bishops.
Thus much for Authority of Scripture and Fathers; now I come to the second particular, that is, Reason. Whereupon I thus Argue, Forasmuch as Natural things and such as depend meerly upon Natural Causes, cannot be positively affirm'd, but only go under the Notion of probabilities; 'tis not to be thought that Contingencies and things depending upon mans will, (and such are most wherein Astrologers have to do) should be hit of by their doubtful and Fantastical Rules of Art.
[Page 114] 2. If the Stars have such Praedominancy as is pretended, it must either be as Causes, or Signs; but they cannot be Causes, for that would infer a necessity of similar Effects, which no man will either pretend to, or Demonstrate; nor can it be a Causality, or to speak plainer, an inclining, but not a compelling Power, that being of as bad consequence, for then how should Partial and Remote Causes produce real and positive Effects?
But if they be only Signs, they must be either Natural, or Supernatural. Natural they cannot be, since they can upon that Score have no agreement with the things signified, nor proceed from the same Cause: nor can they be Supernatural, for then we ought to suppose an Infallibility in the Event.
Now as Chymists and Mountebanks use to flourish in Oratory, and tell the Credulous Vulgar many fine Stories of the Temperature of the Elements, of the proportion of Qualities, [Page 115] and such like puzling Terms, to wheedle an opinion of their Skill into their Auditors: so do Astrologers lash out into large and extravagant Encomiums of the Heavenly Bodies, urge the Coherence betwixt Caelestial and sublunary things, and tell fine Stories that so many Orbs, Stars and Motions were not made by God Almighty to no end; and after much proving of that which none denies, they descend to their particulars, their little Casualties, and Tie every mans Fortune to some Star or other. What (say they) shall we think that the most glorious part of the Creation, in which (as in a large expanded Volume) may be Read the wonderful power and Wisdom of God, was made to serve to no use? or shall we set at nought those things which have so abundantly shewn forth their power upon the Earth?
Let us now descend to their Masterpiece, that is, Nativities, and see [Page 116] what semblance of truth there is in it.
They pretend to observe the very point of their Nativity, and the places of the Stars, which are Fixed, which are Erratick, in what Houses they arise, which Planets are in their Exaltation, which not; whether in a right Triplicity; whether in a Masculine or Faeminine Sign; what Aspects, whether Trine, or Quartile, or Sextile, or Opposition, or Conjunction; and several other hard and Conjuring Terms. From hence (say they) it is easie, either by the Planets considered particularly, or altogether, or with the Signs of the Zodiack, to Collect the Events of humane Affairs, to Describe a mans Inclinations, and give an account of his good or bad Fortune.
Now let us allow them this (which is indeed more than they can prove) that the Fortunes of men are Guided by the Stars; yet what Midwife or [Page 117] Astrologer, either can be so exact, as to know the very Minute of a Nativity, which is necessary to be known, forasmuch as in the space of one Minute there is a vast and unalterable Celerity in the Motion of the Heavens; so that before the Infant be wholly Born, the Constellation will be changed, and the Head will be Born under one, and the Feet under another, which will (if it was significant) prove but Cross Fortune to the Party.
But supposing that this small moment of time do not Disturb the signification of the Horoscope; how comes it to pass that Twins are oftentimes observed to have such different Fortunes, the one of them Dying in their Infancy, the other Living to Decrepit Age: or one of them (perhaps) exalted to Honours and Dignities, and continually Courted with opportunities of Advancement, the other not able to get out of a mean and abject Condition; the one is inclined to [Page 118] Peace, the other to Quarrelling and Disorder; the one is strong of Constitution, the other weak and sickly.
A greater difference arises, if the Twins be one of them Male, and the other Female: is it possible in such a Case, that they should both have the same Genius, and Inclinations? which ought according to these men, necessarily to follow. I hope there is no man but may be convinced of the vanity of this Science, if he take Notice of those that die in the Field, men of different Ages, Born under different Constellations; yet all Perishing by one common Fate.
Were all the First-born of Aegypt slain at the Departure of the Children of Israel; The Aegyptians Drowned in the Red-sea; The Philistins Slain by Sampson; The Children put to Death by Herods Officers, Born under the same Stars? I think none will Affirm it; If not, Why did they Die by the same Death? Are all that are [Page 119] Born under Saturn, Melancholick? Under Iupiter or the Sun, Princes and Potentates? Under Mars, Souldiers or Highway-men? Under Venus, Whoremasters? Under Mercury, Merchants?
I shall now come to Answer those Arguments which Astrologers bring out of Scripture, from Reason, or Experiments.
First for Scriptures: to that out of Genesis, 1. 14. I answer, that they assume more than the Sence of the words will permit; for though it be there said, that God set the Caelestial Lights for signs of things necessarily depending upon their Course and Nature, yet it cannot thence be infer'd, that they are also signs of things meerly Contingent, and proceeding from the different Motions of mans Will and Appetite.
To that of the Stars fighting against Sisera in their Courses, I answer; That by Stars in that place (according [Page 120] to some Interpreters) is meant Angels, which is plausible enough, forasmuch as both are promiscuously called the Host of Heaven: or it may be said, that at that time they did not Operate by a Natural Influence, but a Supernatural and extraordinary Power, God raising up an unusual Effect in the Stars, of causing Tempests to the Annoyance of those Enemies of his people.
In that place of Iob so much by them insisted on, is nothing at all to their purpose: since it may with ease be Turned against them, that it is to be understood, that no man can understand the Statutes of Heaven, but that God has reserved the Knowledge of such things to himself; besides, there is nothing said of the Influence, and Rule of the Stars over mens Minds or Actions, nothing of the knowledge of Future Events, but only Arguments of the Divine Wisdom, to convince Iob of his weakness and Frailty.
[Page 121] And though it be said, The Heavens shew forth the glory of God, and the Stars declare his Handy-work; that makes not for them neither, the meaning of the place being partly the same with that last mentioned, (viz.) that Casting up our Eyes to those glorious Luminaries, we may remember the power of God, who has made them all, and continues them in so wonderful and unerring Courses.
As for the Star which appeared to the Magi coming to Christ, it was no Natural but a Supernatural Star, having a Motion contrary to that of other Stars; few will (I suppose) be so impudent as to affirm, our Saviour was Governed by the Stars, that he who Created, should be in Subjection to his Creatures. And though it appear'd at his Birth, and usher'd him into the world, yet (as St. Augustine says) Non dominabatur Christo ad decretum, sed famulabatur ad Testimonium, [Page 122] nec enim subjiciebat imperio, sed judicabat obsequio. To make this an Argument for their Art would be an absurdity; for if it had force and signification in his Nativity, why had it not over all those Born at the same time with him? I hope they will not say, that they were all to share in the same Circumstances of Life.
Let us now examine their Reasons, and see how they will stand Trial.
Their first Reason is grounded upon a false Supposition, that there can be no other use for the Stars, than to be Characters wherein men may Read their own Fortunes.
The second likewise, (viz.) that we know no other reason for the several Motions, and Aspects, is not good Reasoning, for 'twill not hold to Argue from the Negation of our knowledge, to the Negation of the thing we cannot apprehend; so that if we cannot find what a thing is for, we [Page 123] cannot justly cut it out a piece of Service, and infer a necessity of its being design'd for that use we have devised to apply it to.
The third reason from the Cohaerence betwixt Caelestial and Sublunary things is no better Logick; for although they may sway the Elements, yet there is no reason they should do so in things meerly Contingent, and depending upon the Will and slippery Appetites of Man: though Iupiter, or Mars, or any of the rest, meeting in such an Aspect and Position one with another, may produce a Tempest in the Air; yet I cannot perceive a necessity, that they must Dart a Disorder into my Affections with their Malevolent Rays. And supposing the time of a Nativity can be exactly gathered, yet what reason can they shew for Confirmation of their Rules: they are only such as men have devised, and that without any ground or Warrant [Page 124] from Scripture: what reason can they give that any Aspect should portend that which they say it does, but only some Observation of a thing happening in that time, which they cannot averr to proceed from that Aspect, but that it had been so without it.
And though Enoch, and Ioseph were given to Studies of this Nature, and that Moses was skill'd in the Learning of the Aegyptians, and Daniel of the Chaldaeans, yet it cannot be proved, that they ever favoured this way of Divining at things to come: their knowledge proceeded from another Cause, to wit, immediate Revelation; or else was gathered from certain and Solid Principles.
It must be confessed that the Chiefest Bulwarks wherewith Astrologers defend themselves, are Experiments; yet are they not so strong, but they may be Battered. For some particular Praediction proving true, does not make [Page 125] the Rules Infallible, one amongst an hundred (perhaps made at the same time) Hitting, the rest proving False: why then should all those that Fail be slip'd by and not spoken of, or not be brought in judgment against the Art, as those few which are True, are made so stifly to plead for it.
Many very Eminent and Learned men have Discussed the vanity of Judicial Astrology, as Picus Mirandula, Cornelius Agrippa, Franciscus Vallesius, and divers others, to whose Writings I refer my Reader.
Galeatius Prince of Millain gave a notable Check to one of these men; who was arrived at that height of impudence, as to tell the Prince, he was shortly to Die a sudden and unusual Death, and that himself was to Live a long time after him. But mark how prettily Galeatius Confuted the Astrologer; he caused him to be forthwith lead to Execution, the Prince surviving [Page 126] him many years: and indeed 'tis observable that most of them are ignorant of what shall happen to themselves, and whilst they foretel great Success, and promise Golden Mountains to others, cannot Enrich themselves.
Nor ought we to be Seduced by the Experiments they Brag of, since they are most of them only Collected by little and pretending Sciolists, men of no Faith nor Reputation, most of them too being Feigned and Falling out no body knows where nor when.
Again, in those few which truly happen according to their Praedictions; 'tis not certain whether the Artist might Consult with something else besides the Stars, since many who Deal with Familiar Spirits, Mask their Impieties under the Vizor of Astrology. So St. Augustine lib. 5. de Civitate Dei. Non immerito creditur, [Page 127] cum Astrologi mirabiliter multa vera respondent, occulto instinctu fieri spirituum non bonorum, quorum cura est has falsas & noxias opiniones de Astralibus fatis inserere humanis mentibus, at (que) firmare, non Horoscopi notati & inspecti arte, quae nulla est.