An Answer to two objections against a bill depending in the Honourable House of Lords for restraining East-India wrought silks, &c.

An Answer to two objections against a bill depending in the Honourable House of Lords for restraining East-India wrought silks, &c.

Table of contents

An Answer to Two Objections AGAINST A BILL depending in the Honourable House of Lords, For Restraining East-India WROƲGHT SILKS, &c.

[Page]

An Answer to Two Objections AGAINST A BILL depending in the Honourable House of Lords, For Restraining East-India WROƲGHT SILKS, &c.

Obj. If this Bill Pass, it will not give present Relief to the Poor that are out of Work.

Answ. It will give present Relief, as it will increase the Master-Weavers Credit. As Matters now stand, those Merchants and Yarn-makers we deal with, foreseeing we are like to be undone by the East India Trade, refuse to give us Credit, and many of them tell us plainly, they will not trust us, unless this Bill Pass. The Mercers, and others we sell our Goods to, tell us, if this Bill do not pass into a Law, they must leave Buying of us, and turn their Stocks into the India Trade; because the Gentry of England ask for, and Buy little but East-India Commodities. If this Bill Pass, the Retailers will presently Buy of us, and not India Goods, lest any of them should be left upon their Hands, when the time comes they are Prohibited selling them. If this Bill Pass, it will Incourage the Master-Weavers, to employ the Poor, who offer us to Work, allowing us the Discount of Bank Bills, by which means we shall be able to have Money to pay them; the Master-Weavers will be able to go on to employ the Poor, in hopes of a Trade these Incouragements. If this Bill do not Pass, the Master-Weavers will be Dejected and Discouraged, and under sad Apprehensions must turn out more of their Poor, and employ their Stock some other ways, for the Support of themselves and Families, to the greater Damage of the Nation, and further Calamity of the Poor.

Obj. If this Bill pass, we shall get no Salt-Petre from India.

Answ. We cannot go to the Great Mogull presently, to get a License from him, to give us Liberty to Buy Salt-Petre; but we believe there is as great Reason, that we may have Salt-Petre for our Money, as that we may have Muslins, Callicoes, Raw Silk, Floretta Yarn, Pepper, Fanns, or any other of their Commodities. The Great Mogull, never forbad or hindred the French from having Salt-Petre for their Money, notwithstanding the French King's Decree to hinder the Selling their Goods in his Country, which Decree yet stands in full Force, and is binding upon the Subjects of France, and not Reversed or Dispensed withal. Or is it the manner of Trading Nations to refuse to take Money for their Produce,(unless for their unwrought Commodities for Manufacturies) will not all the other Manufactories and Commodities that we buy for Ready Money and Consume in England from India, be a Consideration sufficient for Salt Peter, which to them is of little value; but why may not our Merchants bring these Silks as well as the Dutch, or any others? Shall we not have as many Markets for India Silks as the Dutch, and more, and shall we not stand upon equal ground with them for Salt Peter; does not the great Mogul desire our Money, and want our Lead, as much as we his Salt Peter; but is this the manner of other Nations? The Venetians prohibit our Cloth, but do we refuse to sell them Tyn or Lead. The Dutch refuse to buy our Dyed Woollen Manufactures, but do we refuse to sell them our mixt or white Woollen Manufactures; we prohibit the Dutch Ribonds and Buttons, but do they refuse to Sell us their Linnens and Velvets? But any thing will serve for an Argument to hinder a Bill that designs only the Regulating the East-India Trade; and it is an Amazement to us to read a Paper, Entituled, Proofs offered upon Oath, by Persons concerned, against the Bill for Prohibiting East-India Silks, &c. Such as follows.

That the Value of One Hundred Thousand Pounds per Annum in Woollen Manufactures have been actually Exported to India.

That in Holland there are many more Loomes going then in England.

That there is no such Edict in France as is pretended, or it is dispensed withal, or some new Edict hath been since Emitted.

That it is not these India Goods which is the decay of the Weaving Trade.

That at this present time Norwich begins to have a brisk Trade, and their Goods are Risen 10 per Cent. and in great Demand.

That though Mercers bespeak Goods of the Weavers, the Weavers will not make them.

That it is only the Silk-Weavers that are concerned in this Matter, and not the Woollen Manufacturers.

That the Weavers concerned in this Affair, are nothing so Numerous as is pretended.

That the Poverty and Misery among the Weavers is very much misrepresented.

That if East-India Silks are Prohibited, and not other foreign Silks, we shall only wear the latter in the room of the former.

Such Notorious Fallacies, uncertain Consequences, and direct Falshoods, as these are, Those that Assert them must either be very Ignorant, or scarce fit for Humane Society; and none would offer to prove them upon Oath, unless they be such as their Learned Councel was pleased to call Journey-men Swearers.

Information about this book

Title statement

An Answer to two objections against a bill depending in the Honourable House of Lords for restraining East-India wrought silks, &c.

Edition statement

1695

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2009-10 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A25631

ID [STC]

Wing A3457A

ID [STC]

ESTC R22369

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

12060240

ID [OCLC]

ocm 12060240

ID [VID]

53221

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A25631)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 53221)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 49:5)

Source

— An Answer to two objections against a bill depending in the Honourable House of Lords for restraining East-India wrought silks, &c.,

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.)

s.n.,. [London? :: 1695]. (Place and date of publication from Wing.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.