AN ANSWER FROM THE COUNTRY, TO A LATE LETTER TO A DISSENTER, Upon Occasion of His MAJESTIES Late GRACIOUS Declaration of Indulgence.

By a Member of the Church of England.

LONDON, Printed for M. R. in the Year 1687:

AN ANSWER FROM THE COUNTRY, TO A Late Letter Writ to a Dissenter, &c.

SIR,

IT is the unhappy state of mankind, that the over-weening Opinions, and Sentiments, which by Education, or Custom, we have entertain'd, incline, and warp our minds so to the maintaining of them; that we are as difficultly alter'd, as the Tree is, which bended, when a young sappling, is rarely by any Art made straight.

Besides this, the tempers of most Mens Souls are such, that they easily divide into Parties, and being listed, as in a state of War, they study nothing more, than to convince, or subdue all those who differ from them. Yea, we too frequently find, that they make those the Object of their aversion or abhorrence, who study to compose their eager tempers, or direct them to any degree of humanity.

Hence it is, that when National limits are not sufficient causes of quarrels, the ranks and degrees of Men, the City and Country, Fraternities, Neighborhood, yea, Domestical Interests, crumble us, and cast us into various figures.

These Jars, and Hostilities, are fomented by Interest, Ambition, and all the cross-grain'd passions of our Souls; and when Religion mixes with our humane concerns, it sublimes all their corrosive spirits, and is the universal dissolvent.

Every one is apt to think the fire of his own Altar the purest, and is not content to have liberty to trim his own Houshold hearth, and warm himself at his own Faggot, but endeavours, according to his power, to make all gain-sayers Victims and Sacrifices to his Deity; and when no Secular Interest moves them, the pretended eager Charity to save their Souls, and the preventing, as they call it, the spreading of that Infection, makes them mortify them in their Estates, or send them to the Pest-house, or cut them off as gangren'd Members

Hence it is, that the Roman Catholick Church, the Church of England, and Dissenters, according as they have had the favour of the Government, or could exercise any Authority, have each of them punished, or supprest the other, and have been more or less severe, according as the Government (judging it to conduce to secure the publick peace,) was inclin'd to embrace that Religion, or the desires of Church-men were more or less pressing, to bring all to Uniformity in Faith and Discipline.

Former Ages have experimented this way of proceeding, and it hath been accompanied with the lowd cries of the suffering Par­ties, the decay of Trade, the unpeopling of Countries, and Inte­stine Seditions and Rebellions. Our unhappy Island hath not wanted Instances of the ill effects of arming by Penal Laws, Church Com­munities, one against the other; so that the Governing Parties, under Religious Denomination, have produced almost as much mischief, as, in Ancient times, the Wars betwixt the Houses of York and Lancaster occasioned; and however oppressive the State-Church of England is reputed, yet I think it will not be disown'd, that when those called Dissenters got the Power in their hands, they made greater Ravage and Depredations in Twenty years, upon the Roman Catholicks, and the Members of the Church of England, than had been inflicted on themselves in an Age; witness the sequestring, decimating, and seizing their Estates, Fining, Im­prisoning, Banishing, and putting to Death of so many, and selling the Lands of the Bishops, Deans, and Chapters.

Our Gracious King, revolving therefore in His Princely Mind the Fatalities that have attended this Conduct, and the unfortu­nate and mischievous Results of such proceedings, (the effects whereof he had felt Himself,) hath, in His profound Wisdom, re­solved to try the most probable expedient, to still and quiet these so long continued Animosities, Contrarieties, and Ferments of His Subjects.

Some publick notices of this He gave in the very beginning of His Reign, by Prohibiting in His Courts, and discountenancing pro­ceedings [Page 3]upon the Penal Laws. But that I may discover the true steps the King made towards it, and the foot upon which the late Indulgence stands, and prevent some Repetitions, I should o­therwise be necessiated to use in my Reply to your Letter; I shall succinctly touch the Kings Progress, and the deportment of some Members of the Church of England, and Dissenters, before, and since the Indulgence.

At the First Council the King held after his coming to the Crown, he expressed the sense he had of the Church of Englands Loyalty, and gave us Assurances of His Defence and Support of it.

This pleased the Dissenters, only so far, as it gave them hopes that the Protestant Religion might be preserved; but they were afraid, lest the King might remember their former promoting the Bill of Exclusion, and that thereby they should not only continue under the lashes of the Church of Englands Discipline, but of the Kings disfavour; and having yet the Idea's which had been in­fused into them of a Popish Successor, and the D. of Monmouth giving them an opportunity to make head under the specious pre­tence of preserving the Protestant Religion, as many of them as were near the Scene of Action, and were fool-hardy, joyn'd with him in that Rebellion; and the wishes for his success were not wanting in most of that Party.

But that Rebellion being so speedily, and almost miraculously suppressed, they fled to the Church of England for Protection, flocked to the Churches, personated a Conformity, and so closely mixed, that they now seemed one Body, and one Church.

Some leading Men of the Church of England, finding this great accession of strength, and being desirous entirely to win the Dissenters over, thought it expedient to let them see, how much they had been mistaken, in thinking them, in the matter of Exclu­sion, to be going over to Rome, and being willing to wipe off the Calumny the Dissenters had cast upon them, as being Papists in Masquerade, they began instantly to shew their utmost Zeal against the Kings Religion.

When therefore, the King, pursuant to His Royal design, before-mentioned, required the taking off the Test and Penal Laws; many leading Men of the Church of England set themselves to oppose the King in it, and from that day, the more they found the King press it, the more they shewed their reluctance. Suddenly, several Ministers, able, or unable, to manage the dispute with the Church of Rome, began to confirm their Auditors, in the Doctrine of the Protestant Religion, and to insinuate the danger we were in to lose it, as soon as the Test, and Penal Laws should be repeal'd; they [Page 4]murmur'd, and repin'd at every favour shewn to Roman Catho­licks, and none were so much applauded, as those who lost their places, upon their denial to concur with the King in his demands. They animated and encouraged one another to stand the shock, not thinking, perhaps, they had to deal with a more resolved Prince, than some of His Predecessors; nor apprehending, or not willing to see, what publick benefit the King design'd to the body of His Subjects, by the Repeal; and in fine, began to pursue all the methods of male-contents, finding this the only way to em­barras the King, hinder all His glorious designs for the publick, and render useless his eminent virtues, in not affording Him the opportunity of appearing like Himself, or rendring His Reign glorious; because, they were unwilling, any thing Great should be performed by a King, that was not of their Religion.

All this, His Majesty carefully observed, and being unwilling to act any thing, but according to Justice, and the Laws of the Land, He wisely enquir'd into the extent of His legal power. He knew he was by the Statutes declared Supream Head of the Church in His Dominions, had undoubted Prerogatives, He might make use of, and a Dispensing Power; and so settled those by judicial Proceedings.

The King having now asserted His Sovereignty, he thought it reasonable, to manifest to all His Subjects, that it was not the ease only of the Roman Catholicks he aim'd at, but that He intended His Clemency should be as extensive as His Empire: First therefore, He published His General Pardon, (excepting some few persons) and in the interim, shew'd His displeasure against those who ob­structed His great design of Repeal; and lastly, published this Indulgence, wherein He layed open the paternal goodness, and benignity of His Soul; the method, of enriching His people, and a foundation of their concord during His Reign; and for suc­ceeding Ages, by extirpating the causes of Animosities, Heart­burnings, Feuds, and Oppressions of His people, by any prevail­ing Party; abridging them of nothing used in their Religious Worship, but only, of the power of compelling any one to Con­formity; and depriving every party of that Authority, of ma­gisterial imposing such distinguishing and Excluding Tests, as incapacitated His Subjects to serve Him, and the Government, ac­cording to their Allegiance, and every Free-Mans Liberty.

One would rationally have thought, that no party should have been wanting in their Thanks for so great a Grace and Favour, so much the greater, in that it was bestowed by a Prince, from whom no such largess of Royal Bounty was expected; not the Church [Page 5]of England, since, in the body of the same Indulgence, so liberal a Provision was made for it; not the Dissenters, who had the most visible benefits; nor any else, who did not prefer the profits they had by the Penal mulcts imposed, or the pleasure of inflicting punishments upon those who were obnoxious to Ecclesiastical Cen­sures, or the Laws for Ʋniformity.

There was then a Party of the Church of England, who, owning the Kings Ecclesiastical Supremacy, and His Prerogative, looked upon this as an Act of State, which the King might Exert at plea­sure, for the publick tranquillity of His Dominions; and thought it their duty to be truly thankful, that the King had so gene­rously secured to them the Honors and Emoluments of the Church, and entirely left them the Cathedrals, the Churches, and the pro­fits annexed to them.

Another, and a major part of the same Church, was vehe­menty moved by the Declaration, murmur'd, that their former serives were slighted; that Dissenters, who had unanimously op­posed the Kings Succession, and been Rebels as often as they had opportunity, were preferr'd before them; and suggested, that this was design'd to enlarge the Roman Catholick Church, and as a scourge to them; and though they never publickly urged it, yet it is most manifest, that the depriving them of the coercive power, (though all other parties were as much disarmed of that, as They,) grate­fully contributed to their reluctance.

The Conductors of their Affairs pitched upon two Expedients, as most effectual to hinder the Kings reaping any benefits to the Roman Catholicks by it. The one was, to secure the Members of the Church of England, from a complyance, by stiffly opposing the Repeal, and questioning the Dispensing Power: The second, by dissuading Dissenters from separating from the common interest (as it is called) of Protestants; or making any court to the King, in rendring any Tribute of Thanks for His Royal Grace to them.

To Estab [...]ish this, consultations are had; leading Men among the Dissenters are treated with, great promises are made, that Persecution against them shall cease, if ever the Church of Eng­land return again to its former sun-shine: Pamphlets from Holland, and at home, aggravate the fear of Popery, and of the destruction of the Church of England, and not only declaim against the abroga­ting of all Penal Laws, but the Dispensing Power, likewise, as tending to the shaking all other Laws, even those of Property; and this seems the design of your Letter, writ smoother than Dr. Burne [...]s, or the Representation, but with as little difference, as to design, as there is betwixt a Dagger in a wooden, or silver Scabbard. [Page 6]Sir, I must own, that the politeness of the Style, the sharpness, and plausibleness of the Arguments, will contribute more to­wards the establishing such Mens minds, who have the greatest affection for the Church of England, and equal aversion to the Church of Rome, than any thing Published hitherto. But in my judgement, you have mixed so much Varnish, as a steady eye may easily discover what need you had of it.

When we see a falling Star, we make no great remarks upon it, because it happens so frequently, and how bright so ever it ap­pear'd, we find nothing upon its fall, but a little jelly dropt from the Clouds. But when a Comet appears, it excites the curiosity of the learned, to enquire into its motion, the altitude of it; and by consulting by-past-times, and considering what events hap­pened when such appear'd before, to make some Prognosticks of its effects.

Your Letter is not to be looked upon as a shooting Star, or paper Kite, but a blazing Star, therefore deserves a serious considera­tion; for whatever those, formerly reputed meteors, did sig­nifie, yours most evidently denotes an unquiet temper in those of your persuasion, a studious desire in them to estrange the Hearts of Loyal Subjects from their Sovereign, a questioning His preroga­tive, and a charging Him with overturning the Laws, and an in­tention to Rule Arbitrarily. This fills peoples minds with doubts, suspicions and jealousies, strows flax all over the Kingdom, ready to be set on fire; when you, by your enflaming Eloquence, have pre­pared Undertakers. Therefore, I think it the duty of all that Honour the King, and love their Country's peace, and tranquil­lity, to examine the tendency, and prevent the evil effects of such an Apparition.

But to leave the Allegory, and consider the Letter: As it is a dis­course penn'd with Art and Elegance, and beautified with orna­ment of Language, it is delightsom to be read; but when the scope of it is weighed, the factiousness of it, under the smoothness of the periods, the unreasonable postulatums, the fictitious suppositions, and the severe reflections upon the King and His Government; it becomes honest Men to enquire into those poisonous drugs, that are so artificially gilded, and provide Antidotes against them.

There are many Thousands of His Majesties Subjects, both better able, and more at leisure, and concerned to Animadvert upon your Letter; but upon the first reading, I found many incentives to urge me to it, when I saw such mis-interpretations of his Majesties Honourable designs, his conduct so calumniated, such dangerous innuendo's, such endeavours to poyson the Mem­bers [Page 7]of the Church of England in their Loyalty; the Arts to make them forfeit their Reputations with His Majesty and the World, by alluring them to do every thing, that made former Dissenters so abnoxious, and leading them in the same steps, with which they had trod the stage so tragical to themselves, and the Kingdom.

What I have writ was the result of my thoughts, e're I had read any Answer, except the first two that were made you, but by distance of place, and other intervening accidents, which hinder the communicating of it hath been stopped hirherto; and if the opinion some have, that it may be yet useful to some that may need repeated cautions and admonitions, to beware of being seduced by the plausibleness of your Language, had not prevailed with me, I should have totally suppressed it. Now that I may do you all possible right, I have inserted the Letter entire, according to the different Paragraphs, and subjoyned mine, and do freely yield, your Column is that of the composit order, beautiful, though not strong, and I hope that mine may be more solid, like the Dorick rather chusing to render my Answer, according to my Capacity, (flattering my self at least in the good intention) sincere and useful than florid or fallacious; desiring all along, when I men­tion the Church of Englands severity, to be understood no ways, as censuring the Church as Author of those Laws, nor questioning the prudence of the State in making Laws, which, according to the temperament of the times, the security of the publick peace, and it may be the desire of Uniformity upon prudential grounds, our Kings thought fit to Enact. But in this great revolution, when our King thinks fit to try other measures, I humbly judge it the interest of all peaceable spirits, and dutiful Subjects, calmly to weigh His Majesties Reasons, and yeild to the Repeal of such Laws, as cannot now be put in execution; and may, in all human probabi­lity, conduce much to the publick tranquility of the Nation. But I shall take an opportunity to speak to this, after I have dispatched what I have to say to your Letter; wherein I would not be under­stood to plead for the merits of Dissenters, but to shew that they have no reason to quit their right in the Kings favour, tendered to them without their seeking, by any Arguments you have brought; nor that the Members of the Church of England ought to be so much disquieted, that it is granted to them, since the Dissenters thereby will be without all excuse, if this make them not better Subjects. Nor think I, the Church of England hath reason to be so jealous of being overlaid by them, since the constitution of the Government of the Church of England is better adapted to the Mo­narchy, than either the Classical or Congregational way; and that [Page 8]the Roman Catholicks can so multiply as to ballance both, in my judgement, is to be reckoned among the portents of Nature, and I will sooner believe a grain of the powder of projection can turn a Hundred pound of Lead to pure Gold, than that this can be effect­ed in one Age, without a Divine Miracle; which, when wrought, none will be troubled at, that own an omnipotent Being, to whose guidance they do submit themselves.

THE LETTER.

SIR,

SInce Addresses are in fashion, give me leave to make one to You. This is neither the effect of Fear, Inte­rest, or Resentment; there­fore you may be sure it is sincere: and for that Reason it may expect to be kindly received. Whe­ther it will have power enough to Convince, de­pends upon the Reasons, of which you are to judge; and upon your preparation of Mind, to be persua­ded by Truth, whenever it appeareth to you. It ought not to be the less welcom, for coming from a friendly Hand, one whose kindness to you is not lessened by difference of Opinion, and who will not let his thoughts for the publick be so tyed or confined to this or that sub-division of Protest­ants, as to stifle the Cha­rity, which, besides all [Page 9]other Arguments, is at this time become ne­cessary to preserve us.

(b) I am neither sur­prized nor provoked to see, that in the condition you were put into by the Laws, and the ill circum­stances you lay under, by having the Exclusion and Rebellion laid to your Charge, you were desirous to make your selves less uneasie and obnoxious to Authority. Men who are sore run to the nearest Re­medy with too much hast, to consider all the Conse­quences: Grains of al­lowance are to be given, where Nature gives such strong Influences. When to Men under Sufferings it offereth Ease, the pre­sent Pain will hardly allow time to examine the Remedies; and the strongest reason can hard­ly gain a fair Audience from our Mind, whilst so possessed, till the Smart is a little allayed.

(c) I do not know whe­ther the Warmth that na­turally belongeth to New Friendships, may not make it a harder Task for me to persuade you. It is like telling Lovers, in the beginning of their Joys, that they will in a little time have an End. [Page 10]Such an unwelcom Style doth not easily find cre­dit: but I will suppose you are not so far gone in your new Passion, but that you will Hear still; and therefore I am under the less discouragement, when I offer to your Con­sideration two things.

(d) The first is, the cause you have to Suspect your New-Friends. The Se­cond, the Duty incum­bent upon you, in Chri­stianity and Prudence, not to hazard the Publick Safety, neither by desire of Ease, nor of Revenge.

(e) To the first, Con­sider that notwithstan­ding the smooth Lan­guage is now put on to engage you, these New Friends did not make you their Choice, but their Refuge: They have ever made their first Courtships to the Church of England, and when they were rejected there, they made their Applica­tion to you in the second place. The instances of this, might be given in all times. I do not repeat them, because whatsoever's unnecessary, must be tedious, the Truth of this Assertion being so plain, as not to admit a Dispute. You cannot [Page 11]thereforer reasonably flatter your selves, that there is an Inclination to you. They never pretended to allow you any Quarter, but to usher in Liberty for themselves under that shelter. I refer you to Mr. Coleman's Letters, and to the Journals of Parliament, where you may be convinced, if you can be so mistaken, as to doubt; nay, at this very hour, they can hard­ly forbear, in the height of their Courtship, to let fall hard words of you. So little is Nature to be restrained: it will start out sometimes, disdain­ing to submit to the Ʋ ­surpation of Art, and Interest.

(f) This Alliance, between Liberty and In­fallibility, is bringing together the Two most contrary things that are in the World. The Church of Rome doth not only dislike the allowing Li­berty, but by its Princi­ples it cannot do it. Wine is not more expresly for­bidden to the Mahome­tans, than giving Here­ticks Liberty to the Pa­pists: They are no more [Page 12]able to make good their Vows to you, then Men married before, and their Wives alive, can confirm their Contract with ano­ther. The continuance of their kindness, would be a habit of sin, of which they are to repent, and their Absolution is to be had upon no other terms, than their promise to destroy you. You are therefore to be hugged now, only that you may be the better squeezed at another time. There must be something ex­traordinary, when the Church of Rome setteth up Bills, and offereth Plaisters for tender Con­sciences: By all that hath hitherto appeared, her skill in Chirurgery lieth chiefly in a quick Hand, to cut off Limbs; but she is the worst at Healing, of any that ever pretended to it.

(g) To come so quick from another extream, is such an unnatural mo­tion, that you ought to be upon your Guard; the other day you were Sons of Belial, now you are Angels of Light. This is a violent change, and it will be fit for you to pause upon it, before you believe it: If your fea­tures are not altered, nei­ther is their opinion of you, what ever may be pretended. Do you be­lieve less than you did, that there is Idolatry in the Church of Rome? sure you do not. See then, how they treat both in words and writing, those that entertain that Opi­nion. Conclude from hence, how inconsistent their favour is with this single Article, except they give you a Dispensation for this too, and by a Non Obstante, secure you that they will not think the worse of you.

(h) Think a little how dangerous it is to build upon a Foundation of Parodoxes. Popery now is the only friend to Liber­ty, and the known Enemy to Persecution: The men of Taunton and Tiver­ton, are above all other Eminent for Loyalty. The Quakers from being de­clared by the Papists not to be Christians, are now made Favourites, and taken into their particu­lar Protection; they are on a sudden grown the most accomplished men of the Kingdom in good Breeding, and give thanks with the best Grace in double refined Language. So that I should not won­der, though a man of that Persuation: in spite of his Hat, I should be Master of the Ceremo­nies. Not to say harsher words, these are such very new things, that it is impossible not to sus­pend our Belief, till by a little more Experience we may be inform'd whether they are Realities or Ap­paritions: We have been under shameful mistakes if these Opinions are true; but for the present, we are apt to be incredu­lous, except we could be convinced, that the Priests words in this Case too, [Page 15]are able to make such a sudden, and effectual Change; and that their Power is not limited to the Sacrament, but that it extendeth to alter the nature of all other things, as often as they are so disposed.

(i) Let me now speak of the Instruments of your Friendship, and then leave you to judge, whether they do not afford matter of suspicion. No sharp­ness is to be mingled where healing only is in­tended; so nothing will be said to expose particu­lar men, how strong so­ever the Temptation may be, or how clear the Proofs to make it out. A word or two in general, for your better Caution, shall suffiee: Suppose then, for Argument's sake, that the Mediators of this new Alliance, should be such as have been former­ly imployed in Treaties of the same kind, and there detected to have Acted by Order, and to have been Impowered to give Encouragement and Re­wards. Would not this be an Argument to suspect them?

(k) If they should plain­ly be under Engagements to one Side, their Argu­ments to the other, ought to be received according­ly; their fair Pretences are to be looked upon as part of their Commission, which may not improba­bly give them a Dispensa­tion in the case of Truth, when it may bring Preju­dice upon the Service of those by whom they are imployed.

(l) If there should be men who having formerly had Means and Authority to persuade by Secular Argu­ments, have in pursuance of that Power, sprinkled Mony amongst the Dissen­ting Ministers; and if those very Men should now have the same Au­thority, practice the same Methods, and Disburse, where they cannot other­wise persuade: It seem­eth to me rather an E­vidence, than a Presump­tion of the Deceit.

(m) If there should be Ministers amongst you, who by having fallen un­der Temptations of this kind, are in some sort engaged to continue their Frailty, by the awe they are in least it should be [Page 17]exposed: The Persua­sions of these Ʋnfortu­nate Men must sure have the less force, and their Arguments, though never so specious, are to be sus­pected, when they come from Men who have Mortgaged themselves to severe Creditors that ex­pect a rigorous observa­tion of the Contract, let it be never so unwarran­tabe.

(n) If these, or any others should at this time Preach up Anger and Vengeance against the Church of England: may it not, without Injustice, be Suspected, that a thing so plainly out of sea­son, springs rather from corruption than mistake; and that those who act this cholerick part, do not believe themselves, but only pursue higher Directions, and endea­vour to make good that part of the contract which obligeth them, upon a Forfeiture, to make use of their inflaming Elo­quence? They might ap­prehend their Wages would be retrenched, if they should be Moderate: And therefore, whilst Vi­olence is their Interest, those who have not the same Arguments, have [Page 18]no reason to follow such a Partial Example

(o) If there should be men who by the load of their Crimes against the Government, have been bowed down to comply with it against their Con­science: who by incurring the want of a Pardon, have drawn upon them­selves the necessity of a Resignation: Such men are to be lamented, but not to be believed. Nay, they themselves when they have discharged their Ʋnwelcome Task, will be inwardly glad that their forced Endeavours do not succeed, and are pleas'd when men resist their Insinuations; which are far from being Volun­tary or Sincere, but are Squeezed out of them by the weight of their being so Obnoxious.

(p) If in the height of this great Dearness by comparing things, it should happen, That at this instant, there is much a surer friend­ship with those who are so far from allowing Li­berty, [Page 19]that they allow no Living to a Protestant under them. Let the Scene lie in what part of the World it will, the Argu­ment will come home, and sure it will afford suffi­cient ground to suspect. Apparent Contradictions must strike us: neither Nature nor Reason can digest them; Self-Flat­tery, and the desire to deceive our selves, to gra­tifie a present Appetite, with all their Power, which is Great, cannot get the better of such broad Conviction, as some things carry along with them. Will you call these vain and empty Suspi­tions? have you been at all times so void of Fears and Jealousies as to justi­fie your being so unreaso­nably Valiant, in having none upon this occasion? Such an extraordinary Courage at this unseaso­nable time, to say no more, is too dangerous a Vertue to be commended.

(q) If then for these and a thousand other Reasons, there is cause to suspect, sure your new Friends are not to Dict­ate to you, or advise you; for instance, The Addresses that fly abroad every Week, and Mur­ther us with another to the same; the first [Page 20]Draughts are made by those who are not very proper to be Secretaries to the Protestant Reli­gion; and it is your part only to Write them out fairer again. Strange! that you who have been formerly so much against Set forms, should now be content the Priests should Indite for you. The nature of Thanks is an unavoidable conse­quence of being Pleased or Obliged; they grow in the Heart, and from thence shew themselves either in Looks, Speech, Writing, or Action: No Man was ever thankful because he was bid to be so; but because he had, or Thought he had some Reason for it. If then there is cause in this Case to pay such extra­vagant acknowledgments, they will flow naturally, without taking such pains to procure them; and 'tis unkindly done to tire all the Post-Horses with car­rying Circular Letters to Sollicite that which would be done without any Trou­ble or Constraint: If it is really in it self such a favour, what needeth so many pressing men to be thankful, and with such eager Circumstances, that where perswasion cannot [Page 21]delude, Threatnings are imployed to fright them into a compliance? Thanks must be Voluntary, not only Ʋnconstrained, but Ʋnsollicited, else they are either Trifles or Snares, they either sig­nifie nothing, or a great deal more than is inten­ded by those that give them. If an Inference should be made, That whosoever Thanketh the King for His Declara­tion, is by that engaged to justifie it in point of Law; it is a greater stride than, I presume, all those care to make who are persuaded to Ad­dress: If it shall be supposed, that all the Thankers shall be the Repealers of the TEST, when ever a Parliament shall meet. Such an ex­pectation is better pre­vented before, than dis­appointed afterwards; and the surest way to avoid the lying under such a scandal, is not to do any thing that may give a colour to the mistake: These bespoken Thanks are little less im­proper than Love-Letters that were Sollicitated by the Lady to whom they are to be Directed; so, that besides the little ground there is to give [Page 22]them, the manner of getting them, doth ex­treamly lessen their Va­lue. It might be wished that you would have suppressed your impati­ence, and have been con­tent for the sake of Reli­gion, to enjoy it within your selves, without the Liberty of a publick Ex­ercise, till a Parliament had allowed it: But since that could not be, and that the Artifices of some a­mongst you have made use of the Well meant Zeal of the Generality to draw them into this mistake; I am so far from blaming you with that sharpness which, per­haps, the matter in strict­ness would bear, that I am ready to err on the side of the more gentle construction.

(r) There is a great dif­ference▪ between enjoying quietly the advantages of an Act irregularly done by others, and the going about to support it against the Laws in being; the Law is so Sacred, that no Trespass against it is to be Defended; yet Frail­ties may in some measure be Excused, when they cannot be Justified. The desire of enjoying a Li­berty from which men have been so long re­strained, [Page 23]may be a Temp­tation that their Reason is not at all times able to resist. If in such a case, some Objections are leapt over, indifferent men will be more inclined to lament the Occasion, than to fall too hard upon the Fault, whilst it is covered with the Apologie of a good Intention; but where to rescue your selves from the Severity of one Law, you give a blow to all the Laws, by which your Religion and Liberty are to be protected; and in­stead of silently receiving the benefit of this Indul­gence, you set up for Ad­vocates to support it, you become voluntary Ag­gressors, and look like Counsel retained by the Prerogative against your old friend Magna Char­ta, who hath done nothing to deserve her falling thus under your Displeasure.

(s) If the case then should be, that the Price expected from you for this Liberty, is giving up your Right in the [Page 24]Laws, sure you will think twice, before you go any further in such a lo­sing Bargain. After gi­ving Thanks for the breach of one Law, you lose the Right of Com­plaining of the breach of all the rest; you will not very well know how to defend your selves, when you are pressed; and ha­ving given up the Questi­on, when it was for your advantage, you cannot recal it, when it shall be to your prejudice. If you will set up at one time a Power to help you, which at another time by parity of Reason shall be made use of to destroy you, you will neither be pitied, nor relieved against any mischief you draw upon your selves, by being so unreasonably thankful. It is like calling in Auxili­aries to help, who are strong enough to subdue you: in such a case your complaints will come too late to be heard, and your sufferings will raise mirth instead of Compassion.

(t) If you think, for your excuse, to expound your Thanks so as to restrain them as to this particular case; Others, for their end, will extend them further; and in these differing Interpretation, that which is back'd by Authority will be the most likely to prevail; espe­cially when by the advan­tage you have given them, they have in truth the better of the Argument, and that the inferences from your own Concessions are very strong, and ex­press against you. This is so far from being a groundless Supposition, and there was a late in­stance [Page 26]of it, the last Session of Parliament, in the House of Lords, where the first Thanks, though things of course, were interpreted to be the Approbation of the Kings whole Speech, and a Re­straint never so much dis­liked; and it was with difficulty obtained, not to be excluded from the li­berty of objecting to this mighty Prerogative of Dispensing, meerly by this innocent and usual piece of good Manners, by which no such thing could possibly be intended.

(u) This sheweth, that some bounds are to be put to your good Breeding, and that the Constitution of England is too valu­able a thing to be ventu­red upon a Complement. Now that you have for some time enjoyed the benefit of the End, it is time for you to look into the danger of the Means: The same Reason that made you desirous to get Liberty, must make you Sollicitous to preserve it; so that the next thought [Page 27]will naturally be, not to engage your self beyond Retreat, and to agree so far with Principles of all Religions, as not to relie upon a Death-bed Repen­tance.

(x) There are certain Periods of Time, which being once past, make all Cautions ineffectual, and all Remedies desperate. Our Ʋnderstandings are apt to be hurried on by the first Heats; which, if not restrained in time, do not give us leave to look back, till it is too late. Consider this in the case of your Anger against the Church of England, and take warning by their Mistake in the same kind, when after the late King's Restoration, they preserved so long the bitter tast of your rough usage to them in other times, that it made them forget their Interest, and sacrifice it to their Re­venge.

(y) Either you will blame this Proceeding in [Page 28]them, and for that Rea­son not follow it, or if you allow it, you have no reason to be offended with them; so that you must either dismiss your Anger, or lose your Ex­cuse; except you should argue more partially than will be supposed of men of your Morality and Ʋn­derstanding.

(z) If you had now to do with those rigid Prelates, who made it matter of Conscience to give you the least Indul­gence, but kept you at an uncharitable distance, and even to your more reaso­nable Scruples continued stiff inexorable, the Ar­gument might be fairer on your side; but since the common Danger hath so laid open that Mistake, that all the former Haughtiness towards you is for ever extinguished, and that it hath turned the Spirit of Persecution, into a Spirit of a Peace, Charity, and Condescen­tion; shall this happy Change only affect the Church of England? and are you so in love with Separation, as not to be moved by his Exam­ple? [Page 29]It ought to be fol­lowed, were there no o­ther reason than that it is a Vertue; but when besides that, it is become necessary to your preser­vation, it is impossible to fail the having its effect upon you.

(a) If it should be said that the Church of Eng­land is never Humble, but when she is out of Power, and therefore loseth the Right of being believed when she preten­deth to it; the Answer is, first, it would be an uncharitable Objection, and very much mis­timed; an unseasonable Triumph, not only unge­nerous, but unsafe: So that in these Respects it cannot be urged, with­out Scandal, even though it could be said with Truth. Secondly, This is not so in Fact, and the Argument must fall, be­ing built upon a false Foundation; for what­ever may be told you, at this very hour, and in the heat and glare of your present Sun-shine, the Church of England can in a Moment bring Clouds again; and turn the Royal Thunder upon your Heads, blow you off the Stage with a Breath, if she would give but a Smile for a kind Word; [Page 30]the least Glimpse of her Compliance, would throw you back into the state of Suffering, and draw upon you all the Arrears of Severity, which have ac­crued during the time of this kindness to you, and yet the Church of Eng­land, with all her Faults, will not allow her self to be rescu'd by such unjusti­fiable means, but chuseth to bear the weight of power, rather than lie under the burthen of be­ing Criminal.

(b) It cannot be said, that she is Ʋnprovoked; Books and Letters come out every day, to call for Answers, yet she will not be stirred. From the [Page 31]supposed Authors, and the stile one would swear they were Ʋndertakers, and had made a Contract to fall out with the Church of England. There are Lashes in every Address, Challanges to draw the Pen in every Pamphlet; In short, the fairest occasions in the World given to quarrel; but she wisely distinguish­eth between the Body of Dissenters, whom she will suppose to Act, as they do, with no ill intent; and these small Skir­mishes pickt and sent out to picqueer, and to begin a Fray amongst the Pro­testants, for the enter­tainment, as well as the advantage of the Church of Rome.

(c) This conduct is so good, that it will be scan­dalous not to Applaud it. It is not equal dealing, to blame our Adversaries for doing ills and not commend them when they do well.

(d) To hate them because they persecuted, and not to be reconciled to be reconciled to them when they are ready to suffer, rather than receive all the Advantages, that can be [Page 32]gained by criminal com­pliance, is a Principle no sort of Christians can own, since it would give an Objection to them never to be answered.

(e) Think a little, who they were that promoted your former Persecutions, and then consider how it will look to be angry with the Instruments, and at the same time to make a League with the Authors of our Sufferings.

(f) Have you enough considered what will be expected from you? Are you ready to stand in every Borough by Vertue of a Conge d'eslire, and instead of Election, be satisfied if you are Re­turned?

(g) Will you in Par­liament, justifie the Dis­pensing Power, with all its Consequences, and Repeal the Test, by which you will make way for the Repeal of all the Laws, that were made to pre­serve your Religion, and to Enact others that shall Destroy it?

(h) Are you disposed to change the Liberty of Debate, into the Merit of Obedience, and to be made Instruments to Re­peal or Enact Laws, when the Roman Consistory, are Lords of the Ar­ticles.

(i) Are you so linked with your new Friends, as to reject any Indul­gence a Parliament shall offer you, if it shall not be so Comprehensive as to include the Papists in it.

(k) Consider that the implyed Conditions of our new Treaty are no less, then that you are to do every thing you are de­sired, without examining, and that for this preten­ded Liberty of Con­science, your real Free­dom is to be Sacrificed: Your former Faults hang like Chains still about you, you are let loose only vpon Bayl; the first Act of Non-compliance, sen­deth you to Jayl again.

(l) You may see that the Papists themselves do not rely upon the Lega­lity of this Power, which you are to Justifie, since the being so very earnest [Page 34]to get it Established by a Law, and the doing such very hard things in order, as they think to obtain it, is a clear Evi­dence, that they do not think that the single power of the Crown is in this case a good Foundation; especially when this is done under a Prince, so very tender of all the Rights of Sovereignty, that he would think it a diminution to his Prero­gative, where he concei­veth it strong enough to go alone, to call in the Legislative help to strengthen and support it.

(m) You have for­merly blamed the Church of England, and not without reason, for going so far as they did in their compliance; and yet as soon as they stopped, you see they are not only De­serted, but Prosecuted: Conclude then from this Example, that you must either break off your Friendship, or resolve to have no Bounds in it. If they do not succeed in their Design, they will leave you first; if they do, you must either leave them, when it will be too late for your Safety, or else after the squeasines of startling at a Surplice, you must be forced to swallow Transubstantiation.

(n) Remember that the other day, those of the Church of England were Trimmers for en­during you, and now by a sudden Turn, you are become the Favourites; do not deceive your selves, it is not the Nature of lasting Plants thus to shoot up in the Night; you may look gay and green for a little time, but you want a Root to give you a continuance. It is not so long since, as to be forgotten, that the Maxim was, It is im­possible for a Dissenter, not to be a REBELL. Consider at this time in France, even the new Converts are so far from being Imployed, that they are Disarmed; their sud­den Change maketh them still to be distrusted, not­withstanding that they are Reconciled: What are you to expect from your dear Friends, to whom, when ever they shall think fit to throw you off again, you have in other times given such Arguments for their ex­cuse?

(o) Besides all this, you Act very unskilfully against your visible Inte­rest, if you throw away the Advantages, of which you can hardly fail in the next probable Revolution. Things tend naturally to what you would have, if you would let them alone, and not by an unseasona­ble Activity lose the In­fluences of your good Star, which promiseth every thing that is prosperous.

(p) The Church of England convinced of its Errour in being Severe to you; the Parliament, whenever it meeteth, is sure to be Gentle to you; the next Heir bred in the Country which you have so often Quoted for a Pattern of Indulgence; a general Agreement of all thinking Men, that we must no more cut our selves off from the Pro­testants abroad, but ra­ther inlarge the Founda­tions upon which we are to build our Desences a­gainst the Common Ene­my; so that in truth, all things seem to conspire to give you ease and satis­faction, if by too much hast to anticipate your good Fortune, you do not destroy it.

(q) The Protestants have but one Article of Humane Strength, to op­pose the Power which is now against them, and that is, not to lose the ad­vantage of their num­bers, by being so unwary as to let themselves be divided.

(r) We all agree in our Duty to our Prince, our Octjections to his Belief, do not hinder us from seeing his Virtues; and our not complying with his Religion, hath no effect upon our Alle­giance; we are not to be Laughed out of our Passive Obedience, and the Doctrine of Non-Re­sistance, though even those who perhaps owe the best part of their Secu­rity to that Principle, are apt to make a Jest on't.

(s) So that if we give no Advantage by the fatal Mistake of mis­applying our Anger, by the natural course of things, this Danger will pass away like a shower of Hail; fair weather will succeed, as lowering as the Sky now looketh, and all by this plain and easie Receipt. Let us be still, quiet, and undivi­ded, firm at the same time to our Religion, our Loyalty, and our Laws, and so long as we conti­nue this Method, it is next to impossible, that the odds of two hundred to one should lose the Bet; except the Church of Rome, which hath been so long barren of Mira­cles, should now in her declining Age, be brought to Bed of One that would out-do the best she can brag of in her Legend.

(t) To conclude, the short Question will be, Whether you will joyn with those who must in the end run the same Fate with you. If Pro­testants of all sorts in their behaviour to one another, have been to [Page 39]blame, they are upon the more equal terms, and for that very reason it is fitter for them now to be Reconciled. Our Disunion is not only a Reproach, but a danger to us; those who believe in modern Mira­cles, have more Right, or at least more Excuse, to neglect all Secular Cau­tions; but for us, it is as justifiable to have no Re­ligion, as wilfully to throw away the humane Means of preserving it.

THE REPLY.

SIR,

IT is a most undeniable truth, that fashionable Addresses are very little to be regarded; and the temper of the Nation as little to be known by them, as we can know Men to be of one inclination, because they were one sort of habit; but when they flow from Gratitude, Duty, and Interest, and not from fear or resentment, they are good symbols of unconstrainedness, and since­rity; and to whom soever presented, ought to be kindly received.

I own not my self a Dissenter from the Church of England, and upon that score, find not my self concerned in all that you write relating to them; but assure you, I am one of those that have a propensity of mind, ready to receive any impression of Reason, and who am so sen­sible, that a great part of the comforts of humane Life, and Oeconomy of Govern­ment is lost, to those who confine their Charity, good Esteem and Candor to those, only of their own Opinion: That you and I differ mostly, in that you confine your thoughts for the publick, to the sub­division of Protestants only; whereas I think, they ought to be enlarged likewise to all Honourable Virtuous, and Loyal persons of other denominations; and nei­ther [Page 9] Fear or Resentment ought at this time, to make us swerve from that Golden Rule, of doing to others, as we would have others do to us.

(b) It is true, that in small wounds, in the fleshy parts only, the sympathetick way of Cure, and closing the wound in its own blood with bandage of clean Linnen, will serve; but where amputations and lace­rations are such (as Seclusion and Rebel­lion) sovereign, wound, salves are requi­site. You allow your Dissenter to act by natural instinct, as other Animals do that can lick themselves whole, and you dress their wounds with so gentle a touch, as if you were unconcerned whether they were cur'd, or not; and least they should infandum renovare dolorem, reflect upon the fresh bleeding wounds, you give them a dose of Opium: It is true, you blame the Patient for his precipitate­ness in using the Remedies nearest at hand, without examining, not only the skill and ability, but the good intention of the Chirurgion, and the vertues of his Reme­dies; but this is all Artifice, that you may get the Patient to commit himself to your care, and that you might possess him with an Opinion, that none else had the true method of healing, which is not fair practice, to decoy him from using the certainest and most assured help this Island can afford.

(c) Here you change the Scene, and transform your Patient into a passionate Wooer, who is fallen in love with a new Friend; and since you presume it will be an hard task to make him quit his new Amours, for his late coy and scornful Lady; you are contriving a Fascination, and would garnish his Bridal Feast with a Mene Tekel, a Memento Mori, which shows (by your favour) an ill nature in [Page 10]you, that will not allow a Dissenter the joy of his hony moon. In this, you are like one that after vows, persuades to Enquires: But I hope e're I have gone through with this discourse; you will ac­knowledge, though your Style is soft and beautiful, yet there is a weakness in your Reasonings, will not easily prevail with a true dissenter, who is not so far gone in his new passion, but that he will hear, and answer too.

(d) Since you quit your exhortatory Preface, which was penn'd to obtain Audi­ence, and now will let us see your dexte­rity at Argument. I shall endeavour to follow your method; owning you have chosen the fittest mediums, and if you could make them as convincing as plau­fible, (which is now to be examined) you might expect many Proselites.

(e) The Kings Justice and Honour was as conspicuous as early, in his praises of, and promises to the Church of England; and I believe, in the upshot, those Politi­cians will be found the worst enemies to both, who made such ill constructions of the Kings desire of the Repeal. So that whatever the Church of England hath, or can suffer, may be ascribed to their taking the matter by the wrong handle. But it is most evident, Dissenters were then design­ed to have a mutual share of Liberty, since the King granted, noli prosequi's, inhibitions, and other relexations to them, as soon as he did to Roman Catholicks. How dutiful it was to reject the Kings Courtship, I leave to all un-interessed persons to judge, and the more the Instances can be multiplied, the greater is the demonstration of the Kings desire to preserve them in their Duty; and the more faulty, those Men who filled peoples minds with the affrightments of the Kings design to settle [Page 11]Popery, and destroy the Church of Eng­land, which they knew morally impossi­ble, and yet continue to make it the only Helmet Argument. Those who fly to any for Refuge, had need use better Argu­ments than flattery: whilst Dissenters were Rebells, they could expect no other Quar­ter than the Law prescribed, if the King had not been most merciful; and it is most apparent, a greater cause of the granting Indulgence, is to take away all occasions and pretences of Rebellion, rather, than singly to usher in Liberty to Ro­man Catholicks, by that Grace. Neither is it any new inclination in the King to re­lieve Dissenters in Communion with the Roman Catholicks, unless you will give him the lie, who so publickly avows, that it hath been ever his judgment, that none ought to be Oppressed and Persecuted for matters of Religion; and I think He ought to be be­lieved as soon as any in His Kingdom. Therefore, if any Roman Catholicks at this time, let fall hard words against Dissenters, it can be against none but such, who they have reason to suspect, do act by no publick spirit of preservation, for any but their own party; and by this show, that they have not changed their Nature, by the favour that is afforded them.

(f) After all the search I can make, I neither find it to be an Article of Faith in the Church of Rome, to deny Liberty to, nor that Faith is not to be kept with Hereticks; and if any Constitution, or Decree of a Council be found to the con­trary, that obligeth not Catholicks in point of Obedience. The fallacy of your reaso­ning is easily detected, by pulling out one pin the whole Machine flies in pieces. One cannot be a Member in Communion with the Church of Rome, or any other consti­tuted Church, (whether Fallible, or In­fallible) who is by that Church declared a Heretick; so that liberty of Communion, is [Page 12]only what is inconsistent with the Church of Rome; but it no ways follows, that Schismaticks, or Hereticks, in their sense, ought not to be tollerated to Live; yea, enjoy their Worship, by the power of the Prince who grants that Indulgence as Father of his Country: For it is no Church Membership that is required by Tolleration. Suppose any Prince, (let the Scene be where it will,) that hath in his Kingdom great numbers of Subjects, of several persuasions in Religion; must he unpeople his Kingdom of Two Hundred of his Subjects, for every single Man of his own Religion, according to your Calculation? Do you judge in good ear­nest, His Ghostly Father, or his Holy Father the Pope, will judge him to be in an habit of sin for it, or enjoyn him for a Pennance, to make such a Carnage? no, surely they will rather let the Tares grow among the Wheat; or if He do not this, must he pull ruine upon Himself, and all those of His persuasion? How Infallible soever the Church of Rome may judge it self, yet you must allow she is not quite void of Sense, Prudence, and humane Po­licy, or will not in several things yield to publick good and necessity. You must sup­pose that Church to oblige that King to a Barbarism, even impossible in it self to be effected, e're you can make good any such conclusion from the Premises. Excommunication is the highest, and most de­structive Sentence, any Church can pronounce; and it is to avoid Mutulations, Dismembring, Incisions, and Corrosives for Religion our merciful King proposeth this Repeal, since it hath been by too sad experience found, how Magistrates (Members of other Churches, besides that of Rome) have been guilty of the same, whether with better Dexterity, Success, or Authority, I now dispute not; but surely all this harangue, tends rather to engage Dissenters, at any rate, to purchase that Sovereign Panacaea, which will pre­vent Persecution from any hand, than to continue in a state of danger.

(g) Kings as well as others may Time matters, and the Indulgence of a Prince makes no quicker a change in a Dissenter, than a Pardon doth after the Malefactor hath his Irons on, or the Halter about his neck, or the poor Man made instantly rich, by finding a Treasure. These motions are from extreames as quick, and as surprizing. Dissenters, while under the sense of continual sufferings, might be instigated to Rebellion, and so be Sons of Belial; yet this sacred Ray (if such mists as you are casting before them hinder not) may well transform them to thank­ful and dutiful Subjects, which is all that is expected. It is true, if the Dissenters Features be not changed, from having a sower, sullen, murmuring, and repining Aspect, to that of chearfullness, and gra­titute; Roman Catholicks have no reason to harbour a good Opinion of them: Or if they be such Bigots, to charge all persons that are not of their persuasion, with Idolatry, (as you know they have done to the Church of England, even by that Churches own Argument,) they are to be instructed better, but this hinders not the King to do them good, even a­gainst their deserts; and I think it one of the greater Arguments, that you are a most Rigid Calvinist; or Brownist, rather than a Church of England-Man, that make use of this Article, and that you are a most undutiful Subject, that will brand your Sovereign with being an Idolater. So that if there were no other Reason; for that single inference, every Loyal Subject should be for Repealing the Test; and be so far from dispensing with any Dissenter for broaching this Doctrine, (which might tempt some judaizing Zealots to stone him) that non obstente, all the Indulgence; they should be proceeded against as enemies to the Kings Crown and Dignity; and that should be all you should get by ridiculing such words as the Kings Prerogative impowers him to use.

(h) That self-preservation may cause agreement of several interests to disarm a common Persecutor, is no Paradox; or that the men of Taunton and Tiverton shall become Loyal, when the prime ground of their disloyalty is taken away; nor that in this comprehensive liberty the Quakers (though no Christians with some, who may object Antichristianity against others) should not be considered. For in the Kings Indulgence the Subjects are not considered, as conforming to Canons and Constitutions of Churches, but as obe­dient, grateful, or useful and industri­ous. Surely in a populous maritine City, we wonder not; nor is it thought inconvenient, that Turks, and Jews, Chi­nesses, Abyssines, Japanners, or Persions, Italians, French, or Spaniards, or any other remote Nations, frequent the Ex­change, and exercise their several Reli­gions, provided they enrich it by Traf­fick; and it is a much pleasinger sight, than to see the streets thronged with beg­gars in as differently patched Coats, soun­ding one uniform doleful note of want, to cause pity and compassion. It is most true, that if a Popish Successor were in reality such a one, as he was sometimes represented, we should need to suspend our belief of his Clemency, and that we have been under most shameful, and I may say of too many, even wilful mistakes, concerning our Royal Sovereign, is a most demonstrable truth; and since He gives so many Arguments, that it is not for the bringing in of Popery, but for the securing, not only His Roman Catho­licks, but of all His other Subjects, from the lash of Penal. Laws, that he grants this Indulgence; whereby all Industrious peaceable Men, may follow their imploy­ments without being obnoxious to Fines, [Page 15]Imprisonments, or Death, for want of Uniformity: It will not surely be the Question, Whether the Priests words of Consecration, can Annihilate the Sacra­mental Bread; but whether it be more Kingly, for our Sovereign to feed His whole Family, or starve some, whilst others are too much pamper'd. It is not the mystery of the Sacrament, so much troubles some, as it is, that a Roman Catholick King should have more kindness for Protestant Dissenters, than those who would be esteemed the zealousest for the Church of England, can afford them.

(i) Mens heads are much easilier la­den with, then unladen of suspicions; how light soever they be, they generally Ballast the Vessel; and where ever jealou­sie enters, with it, croud in Legions of evil Spirits. If one had as many eyes as Pores, it would fit them all with destain'd Optick Glasses, or Prismes, to give de­ceitful Colours to every Object. And that which is most troublesom, in this passion, is, that it is with great difficulty master'd; especially when it is heightned by Interest. You have a great dexterity to improve this, by Affrightment, Calumny, and Detraction; which you couch in such General Terms, as it is difficult to get a grasp of them. Therefore, I must pass by what is Common place, and tell you, that a Secretary of the Cabals of the Usurpers, or to the famous E. of Shafts­bury, could not have given a livelier De­scription of the Imployment of these Emissaries, than you have done; but you do wifely not to expose persons, lest we should know who they are, that are im­ploy'd on the errand, which is only to alienate the Subjects Affections from their Sovereign, and to excite the peoples jealousie. If any be imploy'd that have been detected, and are now sincere, they are fitter to discover the former methods, for being wedges of the [Page 16]same wood, they are fittest for the work of pinning or cleaving. But to hang a scandal in the Air like a Cloud, that none can know where the shower may fall, is not done like a Gentleman of your Morality and Ʋnderstanding.

(k) This character of a Juggler is so drawn to the life, that one would swear you were looking all the while in the Glass, while you used the Pencil. Dissimulation is such a changling, that it is all Vizard-mask, with several foyles seperable by sleight of hand; so that one may sooner find Faith in an Affrican, than in such a shift-coat. But till you can prove such are Commissio­nated to work Dissenters to comply with the King, all the Water runs but by the Mill.

(l) That there are mercinary Men, is no such News, that need be told with such cumlocution. Those that use such tools, will find them often need the whetting, and they must be vain spend-thrifts, (which I think you cannot say of our King;) that pour their Mony into a bottomlels purse. Oates, Ignoramus Juries, and pensionary witnesses, were more proper Cattle to be fed with such Provin­der, than Dissenting Ministers, if I be not mistaken in them. The King neither needs, nor will ever imploy such Instru­ments. He knows better how to manage his Exchequer, than to waste it on such Hirelings, who sell their Conscience and Service by inch of Candle.

(m) From Eye-witnesses, and Con­tributors themselves; I have heard, that several Charities to Non-conformist Mi­nisters, were put under their Preaching Cushions; and I do not much wonder, that these Benevolences (which were as good as Glebe and Tithe) enabled them to resist the Temptation of taking Bene­fices, [Page 17]with the condition of renouncing the Covenant, &c. But that there should be any among them now, who, for such filthy lucre, design to Morigage the Pro­testant Religion, (which you must sup­pose, or nothing,) I shall never believe upon your bare suggestion. In former times by keeping up the Schism, they might hope for some favourable Revo­lution, whereby they might be capable of liberal Maintenance; but that the Rigor of their Creditors shall drive them to put on the Cowl or Scapular, or co-ope­rate with those that design it, shall be no Article of my Faith.

(n) It seems you were sensible of the weakness of this Medium, and now the Dissenters must Preach the Gospel for envy. The forward Ministers amongst them are much obliged to you, since it seems they are either Judas's to sell the Cause for Silver, or must be branded with one of the Devils Characters, Ac­cusers of the Brethren; and whether you lessen their crimes in saying those who act this Cholerick part, believe not themselves; but therein sin against their Consciences, and only pursue higher directions; I leave to others to judge. What wages such may get here, they best know: But I think it must be a severe punishment they may expect hereafter. May we not be more charitable to judge, that such Men are so far from personating a Vengeance, and using fiery Tongues and inflaming Elo­quence, for that end. That they only express their resentment against those, who in their Apprehensions have too severely Persecuted them for Conscience-sake. Such a Plea may be as like to gain be­lief, as your too groundless Accusation of them; for Indulgence, Charity, and Moderation, are very consistent. The [Page 18]King desires all may enjoy their Religion in peace, and hires none to keep up the strife by recrimination and violence, nor designs by the taking away of Penal Laws, that one Subject should worry another; and therein gives you, as well as Dissenters, a Gracious President and Example to follow.

(o) Here, in my Opinion, you have exposed your friends something disad­vantagiously. It is an unfortunate thing for any to have combin'd against the Go­vernment, since it requires much tryal, e're their Repentance can be believ'd. It is true, those that have had the Ric­kets, are found often to have a good share of cunning and wit, but by their bowed Legs, or some other infirm parts, especially in the region of their breast, they are easily distinguished from those of more healthy Constitutions. The old Proverb is as often true, of hasty Con­verts, as of Pardoned Persons, That save a Thief from the Gallows, and he will be the first will do you a mischief. But God forbid all should be censur'd for some Mens double-fac'd Villanies. Such Sycophants shall never find me their Advocate; let every Herring hang by his own Tayl. Let those who are detected, forfeit their neck, or hang by it in the Pillory, e're I pity them. But what I pray do those de­serve, who never wore shackles, or were bowed down e're they comply'd, and pro­mise to their Prince strenuous endeavours for His Service, and that they will not fail to hit the mark; and yet designedly shoot short, or over.

(p) It is an unhappy state of Kings, that when they endeavour by good Me­thods, the ease and profit of their Sub­jects; yet they must be traduced by the insolent Pens of malevolent Subjects. Our Gracious King hath afforded a safe Re­treat, and Liberal Contributions to the Reffugees, whom the great neighbouring [Page 19]Monarch hath Exiled; and by His Royal Enterprise, to get the Penal Laws Re­peal'd, designs not only His Dominious to be free from all Persecution for Reli­gion, but to be a safe harbor for the Dis­tressed; and is thereby taking the most contrary measures to what that neigh­bouring Prince hath done. With what effrontry therefore, can you charge the King, either with imitating His exam­ple, or corresponding with him in that design? I Appeal to the fled Protestants, whether they find not as good usage here, as any in their condition do in other Countries? which, methinks carries con­viction broad enough, that you are a very evil Caluminator. It is true, there was a time, when the belief of Ten Thousand Pilgrims and Black Bills, were endea­voured to be crammed down our throats; and some were such Cowards then, as to be frighted with them. Must we therefore be always Impos'd upon, and never re­turn to our senses again. The frequent discoveries of those Impostures, cannot but recruit the most timerous Spirits, and restore them to some degree of valour, though it will deserve no great Commenda­tion as a Vertue, since the thick mist is so exhaled, which made us take a crop of Thistles, for a Battalion of Pikes.

(q) Amongst a Hundred of your florid Sentences, I have not yet found one solid Reason, why Dissenters should not act as they do in policy, or that they want any Advice or Dictator, when they follow the conduct of their own Interest. They need not go down to those some call Philistines, to whet their Weapons, which are only praises and thanks; which the poorest Beggar, without any touch of good bree­ding, knows how to pay for a small Alms. [Page 20]There was a time, when Petitions, (the Elder Brothers of Addresses) being formed by the leading Men of the Lower House, were posted into confiding Hands, to be sent back Ten, or Twenty Thousand strong: Those tended to the strengthen­ing the hands of the Murtherers of the King; and you would now stint a spirit of Obedience and Thankfulness to our King, which springs and flows from con­tent and obligation, and may be easily discover'd to be sincere, in all the Dissen­ters Speeches, Writings, and Actions, and are so far from needing to be bid, that all your Rhetorick cannot forbid them. Surely you think not their Thanks to spring like Mushroms without root, and in a Night. And if you will not ad­mit Dissenters among the Tribe of think­ing Animals, yet let them have the Re­putation of sensitive Plants, that shrink at a rough touch, and erect their Leaves by a warmer Gleam: I see not therefore, why Dissenters, having the sense of former sharp usage, should not perceive their ease, and whence it comes; and have no reason to question their sincerity of thanks, since they are for a matter of greatest import to them they ever receiv'd from the Crown, since they sub-divided from the Church of England. Yet I believe, there hath been more Industry us'd to Disperse such Letters, as yours of Caution and Circumspection, then ever there was for those Circular ones of three or four Bishops, and you are the first Post that brings the News of any that were threatn'd to joyn with them, or any affright­ments us'd to cause a compliance, since they carry with them all the tokens of Volun­tariness, Ʋnconstrainedness, and Ʋnsolicitude­ness, that could be expected. Therefore, because in good earnest you think they [Page 21]will signifie a great deal, you are at all this pains. If that which Dissenters have so earnestly desn'd, pray'd, yea, fought for, can be called a Triste, you are in the right. I never thought Addressors so lit­tle acquainted with the Constitution of the Government, as to think their Addresses equal to Votes in Parliament, or that they, with the Kings assent, constituted the Legislative; though they may hope, such Votes out of the House, may beget others in it. I do not think any one, that had a piece of Gold given him, would be so besotted to refuse it, till he had consulted such a scrupulous Gentleman as you, whether it were all just in weight and allay, or that the giver came honestly by it. I suppose you are angry the Dissen­ters made not their Addresses in this form.

Great SIR,

WE would thank You for Your Gracious Declaration; but we know not, whether the Law impowers You to grant it; we have heard indeed of Your Majesties having the excecutive part of the Laws in Your Royal Person, and the Dispen­cing Power; and that You desire the Test and Penal Laws may be abolished by Act of Parliament. But before we return You our Thanks for the ease You afford us, or that we can resolve to give our Voices for such Repeal, we desire to consult our common Lawyers, and our Elder Brethren the Church of England, and then we will give You our Opinion; and we do this the ra­ther, least you be mistaken in us. Sir, we dare not encourage You to be kind to us; and we must stay our Addresses of thanks, lest we give a Scandal to our [Page 22]Brethren or they hereafter punish us, for this forwardness.

I fancy you have the vanity to hope that your Letter will prevail with some to desist from Addresses, upon those mo­tives; otherwise, what need was there for you to be so urgent with them to suppress their impatience, and for the sake of those, that are now Abhorrers, to stick close to the Act of Ʋniformity, till the King die, (whom God long preserve to finish this great work;) in hopes a Protestant Parliament, under a Prote­stant King, will grant them better Terms: For I hope, by the word Parliament, you mean not the Two Houses, like those of 41, who Entitled them to the Supream Power. It seems, if Dissenters hearken not to you, though at present you are willing to make a gentle Construction, of the well meant Zeal of some, in drawing others into the Mistake; yet you threaten them with Sharpness and Satyr, because in strict­ness the matter will bear it, if we be­lieve you.

(r) It seems a Dissenter may feed fully, but must say no Grace, or cry Roast-meat; would you have them pet like froward Children, because the Benevolence was not offer'd first to them, or in the Cir­cumstances they desire it. It seems, they may privately thank God for putting it into the Kings Heart, to grant them ease; yea, they may enjoy the Advantag e of it, but without noise, lest some Dog catch the Morsel the Cat purs upon. Oh! a publick owning, and desire to have Indul­gence Establlsh'd by Law, is to support an Act irregularly done against the sacred Laws of the Land: This is such a Trespass, as may no ways be defended; but to observe [Page 23]any rules of good manners or dutifulness to the King, is a grievous fault. Methinks you ought to have brought very undeni­able Authorities, e're you had presumed to question the judgement of the King, His Privy Council, and the Court of the Kings-Bench, as to the Dispensing Power. But since you offer not one Syllable of Argument, I shall remit you to Westmin­ster-Hall to defend the point and receive your doom. You endeavour gent [...]y to stroke the Dissenters, that are under Tempta­tion and Frailties, which makes them, you say, leap over the Objections may be made, and overlook the sad consequence of gi­ving thanks, not only as an inlet to Po­pery, but the giving a deadly blow to all the Laws, by which their Liberty and Re­ligion are to be protected. This is an heavy Sentence; whereby they are judg'd to sell their Birth-right for a morsel of Bread, or a mess of Pottage. Let us therefore turn the Optick Glass, and you may more surely discover, that the King designs no breach of Magna Charta, nor to retain any Coun­cil for the Prerogative against it; but on the contrary, to have it confirmed in a much larger extent, than ever it was by His Royal Predecessors: for it is most certain, that all Penal Laws for Religion are so many infringments of it; and if you would have Magna Charta inviolably kept, you know what Church is thereby Establish'd. Here therefore you quarrel with the King, for en­deavouring to have a Charter of Liberties Establish'd, that will be a standard for all future freedom, and enfranchisement of Con­science; and to infer, that the Subjects yielding to this, will put them out of the protection of all the Laws that secure their Li­berties, is no less an ignorant than seditious Suggestion.

(s) We are a most happy people, in the security we have by Law to enjoy the Liberties the Royal Predecessors of our most Gracious King hath granted. But if His Majecty effect His desire in this [Page 24]Repeal, He will be the Author of a grea­ter freedom to the Subjects, then they ever yet enjoyed; so that none, in mat­ters of Religion, shall be put upon ever Complaining against, or the giving up the Question; since all pretences of puttng it, will be thereby prevented. By the ope­rating power of such an Act, such a mu­tual assurance, and security would be given, as it would be in no parties power to endevour, or to desire to mischief, or destroy another. I fancy indeed, some Apparators and Bailifs may suffer a dimi­nution of profit; and some men of vin­dicative spirits, may want the assistance of sanguinary, and Penal Laws, to revenge themselves by: But the benefit that will redound to the whole, will sufficiently compensate that loss. The Kings of England will be the gainers, in that they will be no more disquieted with Re­bellions upon the account of Religion. The Parliaments will be eased of the tire­som, disquieting, and unpleasing toyl of making Laws, upon every emergence to restrain some party or other from their way of Worship; and imposing Tests and Oaths, according as prevailing Parties have power: and when the intestine struggles of every party, to manacle, and put the shackles and badges of slavery, upon each other, shall be taken away; the Legislative will be at full liberty to at­tend soly the aggrandizing of our Kings, and restoring them to the power and in­terest at home and abroad, of the glo­riousest of their Predecessors: And to make good Laws for the enriching of the body of the people, and by perpetual harmony, unite the Subjects in the common band of Duty and Allegiance to their Sovereign, and mutual love and endearment to one ano­ther. The Roman Catholicks would have no occasion to repine, since they might freely enjoy their Religion, and the Church of England would be possess'd of the Dignities and Benefices they [Page 25]enjoy; and the Dissenters would be satisfied, that they had the freedom of their Tabernacles and Conventicles, and all the con­tent of this would be heightned in the peaceable and durable en­joyment of it; when it would be in no Parties power to invade the Liberties of another. This is the right Scheme of His Majesties generous design; and if Dissenters fall not to their old work of stubbing up Episcopacy, root and branch, it may most certainly continue. For the obedience of Roman Catholicks under a Prote­stant Government, we have the most near and compleat instance in the United Provinces, where they live with the free exercise of their Religion, under a Bishop of their own, who is Treated ac­cording to his Character by the States, to whom they impart their pleasure; and by his directions the Roman Catholicks obey. So, that when the King of France Invaded that Country, none stood firmer than They did. These pay such an absolute Obedience, that if the States, should for a time interdict them the use of their Re­ligion, they would yield to it. So that all you urge as conse­quences of the Repeal, vanisheth upon the very opening the Kings intentions; which, I dare venture my head, that I have more truly declared, than You by all your smooth Oratory, have made out by suspicions.

(t) Expounding of the sense, and meaning of Oaths, is generally granted peculiarly to belong to the imposer; and if the taker satisfie his Conscience, and perform all required in the taking of them; the Civil Power enquires no fur­ther. But in the return of thanks, the receivers of the Benefit, are the best Judges, in what sense they render them; and I know not how they are concern'd in any Inferences, unless of those that scruple their reality. It is true, if Dissen­ters only dream'd of an happiness, they might consult you for the Interpretations, but whilst their eyes are open, and they have the full sense of repose and ease, they must beg you will spare your Divinations, being resolv'd to rely upon the kindness and Authority of the Giver, and will never be afraid of any Inferences, when it is so manifest, that His Majesty designs common ease, and a perpetual settlement [Page 26]of it, by Act of Parliament, which they think they have all the reason in the World to endeavour, may be effected in His Majesties Reign, who laid the Foun­dation of such a Temple of Concord, as none of His Royal Predecessors ever did before. As to the ridiculing some Loyal persons Zeal, to have had a favourable sense put upon the thanks return'd for the Kings Gracious Speech; if there had been more of the Members of both Houses, who would have credited the Kings Royal desire to have been, just and equitable, and reflected upon the true Reasons the King had to insist upon that point; no doubt they might have had a kind return from the King, and such a settlement of the Church of England, as they could have desired, and better than they now may expect. Therefore, since by your Confession, so many never intended to answer the Kings Speech with more than a bare Complement; I do not think it was any such difficulty, to ob­tain liberty of objecting against the Prerogative of Dispensing, which I suppose a great many more are now satisfied in the legality of, and when there is occasion, both the Judges, and other Members of the long Robe, will make clear by Law and Equity.

(u) Sure there are numerous parties of all persuasions, who know how to set a right value on the Constitution of the English Government; but I will never reckon these in the number, who are for such a stipulatory mixt Monarchy, as our old Publicans asserted; who at first com­plementing the people, that the Original of the Supream Authority was in them, as soon as they had power, assumed it to themselves, under the notion of Repre­sentation. To proceed, the end of the Journey will never be reached, if the Traveller set down his rest in the midway. The King hath been the great Means and Author of this Liberty, and I hope it's not that time of the day to Vote Him dange­rous. [Page 27]The way to have that preserved, which is granted by the King, is to study by all thankfulness to preserve His Royal Favour, and to press forward to obtain its compleat Establishment, and never to sound a Retreat, till they obtain the full enjoyment of the Praemium held out to them; which, if by flagging in the pursuit, they shall only enjoy during His Majesties Life, they will have cause to repent at His Death, that they got it not better secured.

(x) Thanks for the Indulgence, and stre­nuous desires to have it Parliamentarily Confirm'd, is taking time by the fore-top, and striking while the Iron is hot. The Temple of Janus was opened in Augustus Caesars time, as a certain sign that the Roman Empire was then at peace: Should not Dissenters rejoyce, even to some excess, that our Augustus hath now open'd it; whereby, through our Vito, they may see what Intestine jars, what effusion of blood, the Penal Laws have made; and from the other may have the most de­lightful Prospect of large, and long lasting Freedom. By the Instances you bring of the Non-Conformists rough usage of the Church of England, when they had the fleecing of it, and the manner of its retaliation. I should think you ought to have determined the usefulness, and necessity of embracing the Kings favour, whereby, neither party might Tyranize over the other for the future; rather then to decoy the Dissenter, by the soft word of mistake, as if either Party did such mischief to other, by some Venial Inadvertency only, when all the World knows, that the endeavours to secure their several Governments, occasion'd the sad galling of one another: Yet of the two, it is Demonstrable, that the State Church of England Men were the favourablest.

(y) Here you think to put the Dissen­ters upon a Dilemma, that if they blame [Page 28]the severe usage of the Church of Eng­land against them, they must not now re­turn it by being angry with them; or if they allow it they must not be offended at what they did. What if Dissenters shall reply, that by too sad experience they have found, that Persecution was ruinous to both, and that it is neither Anger or Revenge against the Church of England, that makes them so thankful to the King, and so desirous that all Tushes may be filed off, whereby there may be no Tearing or Tyrannizing by any Party for Conscience; but for ease-sake, these have reason to wish the Rod burnt that felt the last smart of it; will not this Answer cut of the horned Argument?

(z) A Man not well skilled in your cunning, would judge you were owning all this, when you disallow the Methods of the former Rigid Prelates, and would make Dissenters believe, that the present Bishops and Clergy of the Church of England, by the Sense of their former mistaken Rules, were content to lower their haughtiness, and were ready to change the spirit of Persecution and bitter­ness, for that of Charity and Condescen­tion. But the Inference you make is very contrary and falacious; viz. that because (if they believe you) the present Con­ductors of the Church of England, are of an Uniting Temper; therefore the Dissen­ters must so far relie upon their good na­ture, that they must reject the offers of a most Gracious King, who endeavours to secure them from present and future sufferings, and put it out of all peoples power, when the next favourable revo­lation comes, to have recourse to former severeties. Suppose the Dissenters say, that they may be justly jealous, that if a thousand of the Church of England, in this juncture, gave them an assurance [Page 29]under their Hands and Seals, that they should never be compelled under a Pro­testant King, to Conformity, they durst not relie upon it, much less on such a single Voucher as your self; what have you hitherto produced, to con­vince such unbelievers.

(a) Church-men, of all Societies, may be subject to like passions as other men, and I believe them not only humblest, but the charitablest, best natured, and holyest too, when their power is not overgrown. But it doth not therefore follow, that the objecting the severity of the Church of England against Dissenters, when che­rished by a Prince of her Communion, is uncharitable and ungenerous, much less, that it is mis-timed: For if the Members of that Church did not endeavour to hin­der the Repeal of those Laws, which only enable them to re-assume their Rods and Axes; Dissenters might hope their kind­ness was to be relied upon. But since they see them so unwilling to part with their offensive Arms; even at the desire of their Sovereign, they have just reason to think they scandalize them not, in saying, they dare not as yet believe that they intend them any good security that they will not call them to an after-reckoning, or that they will afford them such an assu­rance of freedom, as they may now have under the Kings broad Seal. But to pass on; I wonder not so much at your denying the Church of England is never humble but when she wants power, for you may mean an­other Church than other Mortals do; or by humble, you may mean she least useth Church Censures, when the Magistrates Inflict the Laws most severely; which Eva­sion you may, when pressed, flie to. But the reason you give for it is more surpri­zing; [Page 30]that she is even now meek and lowly, when she hath power to confound all Dissenters with a Breath. This indeed is a brisk flourish; like a brave Leaders encouragement to his seemingly foyled Party; that he hath one stratagem yet, which will gain the absolute Victory, if they will credit his Conduct. I pray Sir, for all this rattle in the Clouds, (which is no more formidable than intelligible) give me leave to ask you, what this Smile, this kind Word, this glimps of Compliance, should be, that can work such wonders. There was a time, at, or before some Men were put to the Test, when a com­pliance with the Kings desires of Repeal, would have continued several Eminent Men in their Stations, and they would have felt many effects of His Majesties Royal Favour. But all that would have been as a reward of their publick splritedness, and concurrence with the King, in the truly Catholick design of making all His Subjects easie as to their Religious Concerns. But it looks like Presumption, yea, insolence in you, to assert, that when such have lost the opportunity of preserving themselves in the Kings good Opinion, He should take them into His Throne, and permit them to guide His Arm, to dart His Thunder where they please. No, if they should offer all compliance, for the future securing Roman Catholicks, provided they might execute Penal Laws against Dissenters, yet this would have no power to encline a Prince, so steady to His Resolutions, and the publick Declaration of His Judgement, to alter in the least His Royal purpose, of granting Universal Liberty of Conscience, to such as would live peaceably, and give no disturbance to the Civil Government. Much less can those hope to prevail, who declare all Compliance with the Kings desires so Criminal and Ʋnjustifiable, that they will rather choose to stand mute, and be press'd to Death, in hopes to preserve their Estates for the next Heir, then to quit their beloved Test.

(b) As to Provocation, while you write, you commit the fault you so se­verely complain of. As to those Books, writ upon the subject of Religion; every one may observe, that those, in defence of the Protestant Doctrine, have been [Page 31]throngly cryed about the streets, with the Emphasis of being Vindications of the Church of England, and the Licenses of the Arch-bishop of Canterbury, or Bishop of London; whereas, Roman Ca­tholick Books, except some few Sermons of the Fathers, have been dispers'd with­out the pomp of a publick Cryer. Only some Dissenters, concern'd to give pub­lick Testimonies of their gratitude to the King, have enlarged the Gazets, and set some Printing Presses on work. But that any such Writers are Ʋndertakers, or have made any Contracts with the Roma­nists to begin a Fray among Protestants for the sport or advantage of the Church of Rome, I see no shadow of Reason. Since the Interest they have to own the ease they find by His Majesties Indulgence, and the Opposition they find from some Members of the Church of England to it, are sufficient Motives to them to write and speak all they have hitherto done. And your entring the Lists with so many fine devices on your Helm and Shield, and all over your whole Armour, cannot but Excite many Combitants to engage so gaudy a Challenger.

(c) What you expect to be applauded or commended in this conduct, I cannot tell! Persecution for Conscience you own to be ill, yet you would not have it equal dealing to blame such who op­pose the Repeal of such Laws, as only arm Persecutors, which is dancing in a Circle.

(d) To hate the causers of our Tor­ments, is very natural in those, who have not learnt to pray for their Enemies; but for the Persecuted to court and love the Persecutors, who judge it Criminal, and are ready to suffer themselves, rather than yield up the wheels, racks, and [Page 32]strapado's, fetters and chains, and the cruel instruments of Persecution, when the Supream Magistrate forbids it, is a Principle, neither Heathen or Christian can own: So that I will not trouble my head to Divine what the Objection should be that you acquaint us not with, and yet you say is un-answerable.

(e) I have heard it accounted as some solace, to have Companions in misery; but never that any took delight in pro­curing Torments to others, that they might have more stripes themselves. How the Papists should promote the Penal Laws against Dissenters, is a Ridle: How­ever, it is not dutifully done, to make the Church of England the Lictors and Bedels of the Church of Rome; but some will lose their Friend, e're they lose their Jest, or false Sug­gestion.

(f) This Paragraph ought to be ac­counted for at Westminster-Hall. Before there can be any sense made of it; it must be most scandalously suppos'd, that the King is about to alter the Constitution of the Election of Knights and Burgesses, and to design another, Praise God Barebone Parliament; then which, no reflection can be more odious.

(g) When-ever the Dispensing Power is argu'd, I doubt not but many more Members in Parliament will allow it, than did before the point had been so cleared as now; and in duty we ought to believe the King, by the Repeal, in­tends no more than what He expresses in His Royal Declaration, notwithstan­ding the Indulgence to secure the Church of England in her rights and possession of the Honours and Revenues, and Liberty both to it and Dissenters; which being done, there will be no room for those unreasonable Surmises.

(h) The great Talbots Name was long after his Death us'd to affright the Children of France with. Is it fit that a se­rious Gentleman should judge all Dissen­ters such Children, as to be affrighted with the Name of Roman Consistory. Our Lawful Sovereign is the only Lord of the Articles, who will propose the Question, and Obedience in this case may be more beneficial, than to be always made Sacrifices by severe Penal Laws.

(i) Is it a Parliament of two Houses you mean, shall offer this Indulgence to Dissenters? or would you have them stay to the next Ages? If the first, you deserve the doom of a Traitor, since you must Exclude the King, unless Roman Catholicks be included; if the latter, you must fit the Dissenters with Iron Shooes.

(k) You Write as if you were one of the Plenipotentiaries at a Treaty betwixt Roman Catholicks and Dissenters, and were well acquainted with the secret Articles. All the World hath judged Dissenters to have a great aversion to implicit Faith and blind Obedience; but they must all be the most absolute Resigners of their Reason and Religion, to the guidance of Roman Catholicks: If for this pretended Liberty of Conscience, as you call it, they must Sacrifice their real Freedom. I be­lieve rather that the weight and galling of their late Chains, are so much felt, that they will be very unwilling to have them put on again by some Members of the Church of England; and the confidence to be ever freed from them, makes them so ready to embrace this Jayl-Delivery.

(l) To what degree soever either Roman Catholicks or Dissenters may judge valid the Dispensing Power; yet, that no ways should hinder them, from desiring the Indulgence may be Established by Law, to perpetuate that favour which they, at [Page 34]present, are only secure of during the Kings Life: And as all Gracious and just Princes, desire their Honour and good Fame may long out-live them; so they wish, that the benefits they intend for their people, may be extended to future Ages. Therefore, however His Majesty may be satisfied in the rights of His So­vereignty, yet for the tender regard of the future Repose of His Subjects: It is a most Gracious Act in Him, to endea­vour the concurrence of His Two Houses, which by an impropriety of Speech you call the Legislative; when it is well known, that without the Royal concurrence, the Two Houses are only the Legispreparative.

(m) By those words, and not without Reason, you discover your self to have been a Seclusionist; and yet want the candor of an ingenuous Dissenter, who is not angry that those Members of the Church of England complied so far; since it hath given them the opportunity of experiencing the Kings surprizing Cle­mency, and condemning the groundless jealousie they had of Him, which prompted to that Reluctancy against His Rightful Succession; and the Dissenters have no reason to be sorry, that these Members of the Church of England made no fur­ther Progress after the King came to the Crown. Since that stop of theirs made the Wheel move faster towards the Indul­gence, the benefit whereof least they should be in danger to lose, they will with all sedulity endeavour to promote, though I presume, by no indirect means, but such as may be agreeable to the duty of their Allegiance and Thankfulness, they owe to the King for it. Then the scrupulous niceness concerning significant Ceremo­nies [Page 35]will cease, because none will be obliged to use the Cope, Sur­plice, or long Cloak, but such as like them; only I hope it will be always prohibited to Preach in Buff-coats, and mingle Blood with their Oblations.

(n) Nothing is more common, than to find Names affixed according to peo­ples fancies, and after a while one word serves for Description, Definition, and Character. If Liberty of Conscience once be made practicable, and in the vogue, Those discriminating Cyphers will be useless, and all Subjects will be considered in their morality, or immorality, obe­dience, or disobedience, rather than by the Cognizance of their Religion: It is no strange thing in Nature, that by some influence of the Heavens, and aptness of Soyl, some Plants may shoot up more in a Night than others, backned by severe Frosts, do in a Month; and why the rare Plant of Liberty in Religious Worship, may not be as perennial as the Thistle of Persecution, I see no great Reason, if Cultivated with common care. If the prospect of continual suffe­ring, and the want of Christian Liberty, made Dissenters Factious and Rebellious; it is to be presumed, that the Fundimental Instigation being removed, the Witch­craft will no longer prevail. It is the concernment of all Governments, to see that Men be true to it e're they be trusted; and when Princes lay by their co-active Laws, it is the interest of the Subjects to lay aside their Animosities, and when all Parties quit their Fire-Arms, and offen­sive Weapons, I see no reason to despair of Harmony and Accord in the duty of Christians and Subjects; and thus being linked in the common bond of freedom, I see no occasion to throw one another off again.

(o) If things now tend naturally to the ease of Dissenters, they have reason to be most thankful to the King, as the sole bestower of it; and I see no Reason they should let go the Bird in hand, in hopes to catch another in the Bush. I should think they acted with less circum­spection than they have wonted to do; if they slip the opportunity of that ten­der made them, in expectation of en­joying any thing like it, when the Church of England shall be in a flourishing condi­tion. Besides, it may be a Question, whe­ther a Toleration after the patern of the Low Countries, may not be more preju­dicial to the Church of England, than such one as may be now adjusted.

(p) Here you are very Magisterial, and have undertaken far more than your Credit will go for. To say a Church is convinced of an Errour, befits none but the Prolocutor of a Convocation, when such a Vote was passed with a Nemine Contradicente, and to ensure for a Parlia­ments Votes, is more than any Ten Mem­bers of it can do. But I presume you speak by Figure here, that if Dissenters will not joyn with Roman Catholicks to be thankful for the Indulgence, and will stick close to the Members of the Church of England that oppose it; then the Parli­ament under a Protestant Successor, and a Convocation will set such a value upon that service, that they will be gen­tile to them, and establish some Bill of comprehension, which the Governours of the Church of England, could never hi­therto be brought to yield to. All this looks so like decoy, that the Dissenter of the lowest form will perceive it. But what ever they do, all thinking Men, must judge the design of this is to animate all Protestants to weather out the point, and [Page 37]heighten their opposition to the King, which in former times would have been stil'd Sedition. As to that excellent Princess, I suppose you mean, few Princesses in Europe are known to Excell Her in the Accomplishments of Body or Mind; and as Her Royal Father is as Indulgent to Her Highness, as any Prince can be; so She is as Dutiful; and whatever the King Establisheth in His time for the publick Good and Tranquility of His Kingdoms, if She over­live Him, I presume it may be Her desire, if not Her Interest to ratifie; and to what perfection soever His Majesty may bring this Pantheon, there may still remain beautifying, and adorning for His Successor, and room enough to enlarge the Foundations, and build stronger Defences against the common Enemy of Persecution, if this conspiring against a work, which You own Dissenters need, and deserve, do not destroy it.

(q) In this Paragraph you are numbe­ring the people, and examining Your strength by the Muster-roll; and the head of those Powers you design to Op­pose, is manifestly the King, which is not very agreeable to the Church of Eng­lands Doctrine of Non-Resistance.

(r) Good words butter no Parsnips; if the Expressions of Duty were not tainted and hollow, and in your Opinion His Majesties Religion did not only shade, but totally Eclipse His Vertues: Your Alle­giance would not look, as it doth, more like a Submission than a Duty; nor would You adventure upon that Bravado, that some own their best security to Passive Obedience, and the Doctrine of Non-Resistance, which look very like bid­ding Roman Catholicks beware least they rouse a sleeping Lyon: For I know not who they are that Laugh at the commen­dable Doctrine of Non-Resistance; but when I see Men fomenting jealousies against their Sovereign, ridiculing His Conduct, endeavouring to Represent Him as acting against the Laws, assuming an Arbitrary Power, denying Him the service of all His Subjects, and by all possible Arts, endea­vour to withdraw the Affections of the people from Him solely, [Page 38]because of His Religion; I cannot judge such to be true practicers of that Doctrine.

(s) Here you give a touch of your Astrology, and it being customary for the pretenders to that Art, to attempt by Horary Questions to know Diseases, and after a while to set up for Empericks: So you give us a pretty Receipt to clear a lowring Sky; the Sense of which is, for all Protestants to lye in of the sullen, keep their beds, and there use some kind of reasonable Devotion, and entertain their Visitants with discourses of their Loyalty, and their adhering to the Laws, and it will be twenty to one but they will be freed from the Hail-storm, and escape the danger of the Infectious Air. But lest any should object that, Bed-zid Protestants are not like to keep out Popery, you have a most Infallible Elixir in your Reposi­tory, which is, that neither the Church of England, or Protestant Dissenters ought to be affrighted with any fear that the Roman Catholick Religion can be Esta­blished by a Toleration (since the ods is two hundred to one) without a greater Miracle than any we read of in any Le­gend, especially in the old Age of a Church, which hath been so long barren of them. For shame therefore give over your false Ala­rums; amuse the Dissenters no more to such circumspect standing upon their guard, to keep out Popery, since in our days there is no feeding Five hundred with Five Loves and two Fishes.

(t) The conclusion is agreeable to your premises, an Exhortation to an Association a gainst the King, and all of His judge­ment in the matters of the Test; and the motives to it are pretty odd, that since both Parties have been too blame, in Per­secuting one another, therefore they should be reconciled, and combine in opposing the Indulgence, which is most [Page 39]likely to put an end to all rancor and malice. One would have thought, that the Inference more naturally should have been, that since they both had experienced the mischiefs of Persecution, and neither of them bettered their condition by it, therefore, they should both have joyned in the promoting the general Indulgence, that there might be no more strife among them, since they were Brethren; I am sure this had more truly resolved the Question. But instead of this, you tell the Dissenters, (without giving any Rea­son for it) that dis-union is not only a Reproach, but a danger to both. This I own to be true, if the Union you desire were for the publick good of both, but if the Union be to combine you and them in equal undutifulness and ingratefulness to the King; if this Union be desired to hinder the Kings Progress in His laudable purposes; if this Union be but to while the business with a Shall I, Shall I, to tire the Kings Patience, and disappoint His expectation, it will redound to both the Dissenters and your Danger, if not Reproach. To persuade to such an Union as this, is the whole drift of your discourse, and something you must mean more than Passive Obedience, when you rivet the Nail you have all this while been driving in, telling your Reader, that it is as unjustifiable to have no Religion, as wilfully to throw away the means of preserving it. This looks like a second sound to Horse; and you have a pretty slight in your Mouth, to persuade Roman Catholicks, (because you think them so credulous of Mira­cles) to neglect all Cautions or means to preserve themselves, but to relie upon a Supernatural Power: But those of your Principles must use the Humane Means of preserving it, and of how many Battalions these must consist, though you have reason to conceal the Intimation from the World; yet you give a sufficient Item, what may be expected, and thereby caution the Government to have more Circumspection over your Sayings and Actions.

Thus Sir, I have now finished my Observations upon your Letter; I shall subjoyn something the subject matter induceth me to offer to the consideration of all Christian Dutiful Subjects, and then close the whole.

SIR,

I have hitherto follow'd the train you have lead me, and endea­voured to give a reasonable Answer to the most material parts of your Letter. What was bare supposal, and groundless suspicion I have not much concerned my self with. Those being but like the Feathering of unpiled Arrows, which help their flight, but en­force them little to do harm, where-ever they fall. Neither have I attempted to reach the Towring Flights of your Oratory, which how Ornimental soever, are but like mounting Bubbles, which break and vanish when at the utmost stretch. Your affrightments, when well considered, are but like the sparks in a Smiths-shop, which upon a brisk heat and stroak, fills all with seeming liquid fire, yet it is as soon extinguished as the Iron cools, or the labour­ing stroke ceaseth. What was Seditious, and tending to insti­gate the Subjects to jealousies and disloyal Opinions of their Sove­reign, I have endeavoured to Disprove, and Repress. What was Calumny, I have gently wiped off; unless when it was couched in such general Terms, as placed it beyond all reach of the Spung. Rebells in open Hostility, are not so dangerous to a Prince, and His Governmet, though the severest Punishments are inflicted on them when mastered; as those are, who by sly Arts, Detraction, evil Surmises and Constructions, render their Prince suspected of Ruling Arbitrarily, and altering Religion and Laws; and thereby blast His Credit with His people: For those are the Men that make the whole Reigns of Princes troublesom, and unfortunate to Themselves and their Subjects. These List the Men, provide Magazines and Arms, and prepare all things in readiness against the sound of the Trumpet, and do not only Muster the Rebels, but they do, as much as in them lyes, to enfeeble or taint the Allegi­ance of the remainder.

You have contributed all you possibly can to effect these things, and exposed your Letter as a Banner to invite to jealousies and fears, which are the very Avant-couriers of Sedition and Rebellion; and this in you that pretend to be a Son of the Church of England is so much the worse, in that you know how strictly it enjoyns Obe­dience to the Lawful Sovereign, and how much the Doctrine of Non-Resistance hath been taught and practised by its Members.

If the Kings Intentions to settle the Roman Catholick Religion by force, (which you surely cannot in good earnest believe practica­ble) were much more apparent than it is: If the inevitable ruine of the Protestant Religion here, should be the consequence of the [Page 41] Repeal; and if the exercise of His Prerogative and Dispensing Power, were the certain ruine of all Mens Properties, you and others who own no other Loyalty to their Sovereign, than what is consistent with their supposed Interest, could not invent more provoking Reflections upon the King, or mis-interpret His Actions worse than you do.

But how unreasonably undutiful is it in Subjects, and those who would be reputed the zealousest for our Church, to charge the King with Intrigue and Hypocrisy, or breach of promise; who of all Princes living detests mear tricks, and to prevaricate with any: To whom Dissimulation is the odiousest of Vices, and whose very In-bred, Natural, and Heroick courage, places Him as much above all low Arts, as His Dignity doth above His Subjects.

Besides all the un-answerable Arguments which have been pro­duced, why the taking off the Test and Penal Laws cannot work such a change in our Religion; you may consider, that at the same time the Church of England may be Insured by Laws of greatest caution. Furthermore we have most solemn and publick promises, That His Majesty will Protect and Maintain the Church of England in the free exercise of its Religion, as by Law Established, and in the quiet and full enjoyment of all Her Possessions, without any molestation or dis­turbance, which He will inviolably observe; If by a stubborness, that shall be unpardonable in the judgement of all Impartial Men, we forfeit not a Clemency so rarely to be parallel'd. To all which may be added, the universal aversion of the Nobility, Gentry, and Commonality to the Roman Catholick Religion, occasioned even by the deepest Impression that Education, Custom, and an Opi­nion of the Purity, and Primativeness of it, hath made.

If none of these Arguments will prevail with you to change your evil Opinion of the Kings designs by the Repeal; consider delibe­rately, I pray you, how the King must overthrow the very Foun­dation upon which the great Enterprize of Universal Liberty, and consequently of all the Benefits to His people, by enriching them, and keeping them in peace, and securing the Roman Catholicks in future times in any tollerable state, if He ever give way to invest any one Church-Community with a Coercive Power.

But I know it is Objected, that if a Toleration only were inten­ded, how comes it to pass, that so many Loyal Members of the Church of England, even of those who so couragiously adhered to the Crown in its utmost danger, are now displaced, and the Roman Catholicks, or Dissenters, even such of the last, as have most vio­lently opposed His Majesties Succession, are substituted in their Rooms?

In answer to this, It is well known, that the number of Prote­stants of the Church of England, Employed by the King in His Court, in His Council, in His Courts of Judicature, in Camp, and all Places of publick Employments, almost as far exceed the Roman Catholicks, as our Clergy do theirs; and yet we make so hideous a noise at the Conferring Places and Honours upon some deserving and Loyal Roman Catholicks, and two or three Masters, and a few Fellows of Colleges being Preferr'd; which are but the effects of common distributive Justice, and consentaneous to the Paternal care of such a Prince, who would show some marks of favour to those few of His own Religion, who are not now surely to be wholly Excluded. Therefore, in my judgement, it shows a very ill Nature in those who own His Majesty to be their Lawful King, and that He may at His Pleasure use the service of which of His Subjects He pleases, to grudge His intermixing so few of His own Religion with others.

Besides this, you cannot be ignorant, that it never was the practice of any Prince, or Government, what Religion soever, to imploy Subjects in Places of Trust, who set themselves directly to oppose, what by prudent forecast for the publick good, they determined to Establish. Now since the King, for the Reasons published in His Gracious Declaration, is so intent upon compleating this great work of General Freedom, and securing those of His own Religion, in common with the rest. It cannot be thought reasonable, or expedient, that He should cherish and countenance those, who so bitterly oppose him in it: Especially since it is so apparent, that even such, who have shown great zeal for the sup­port of the Crown upon the Heads of their Protestant Sovereigns, now manifest, not only an indifference, and coldness, but an un­becoming way wardness to the Kings Service: In so much, that some decline sitting in Commission with Roman Catholick Justices of the Peace, and others think it honourable to quit their places, rather than to make one step towards the Repeal; so that even the Badges and Livery of Loyalty are changed, from that to the King, to that of the Church of England; and those who make the grea­test complaint of hard usage, have themselves turned the Tables.

As to Dissenters, it is their Interest to close with the Crown side for Protection, and since they can derive this unlooked for favour from none but the King, they should be the most ungrateful of Men, if with chearfulness, and sincerity, they did not pay all possible Acknowledgments to His Majesties Bounty for it. So that I do not wonder to hear them, with great Asseveration say, it was not for a Commonwealth they fought, and were continually striving against [Page 43]the stream, but it was to get the Weather-gage of Persecution: It was to obtain this Liberty of Conscience, which they never could expect from former Governments, that provoked them to commit such Hainous things they now are ashamed of; and which, indeed they ought to Attone for in another manner than they have hitherto done. They now declare, that if they might have had the Tenth of that Liberty the Church of England now enjoys, under our Gra­cious King, they would never have lifted up an hand, or opened a Mouth against the late Kings of blessed Memories, and I think they are the rather to be believed, because neither the Doctrine, nor the Ceremonies of the Church of Rome, are so much declaim'd against by them now, as those of the Church of England, which they formerly reputed Idolatrous: They now think themselves justified in their Espousing the Parliaments side, from whom they expected, and had Indulgence, and please themselves to find ano­ther kind of non Addressors, and as zealous persons to hinder the Repeal of Penal Laws, against their Sovereigns declared desire, as they were formerly for it. Yet, though the Scene be thus changed, I hope there are sufficient numbers of such, whom the Church of England will own to be her Children, that will let no Dissenters out-goe them in Loyalty, and Dutifulness to their Sovereign; and who are well assured, the King will have as great regard to them, and our Church for their sakes; and as freely permit them the enjoyment of the Exercise of their Religion and Benefices, as to any, provided they will concur with Him in the Repeal, and be content to let their Fellow-Subjects, of different Persuasions, enjoy likewise their Liberty.

That the Members of the Church of England ought to yield this in common prudence, and even for the Preservation of their own Religion, I think there are many Reasons; especially this, that as yet the time is not clapsed, but that when His Majesty convenes His Parliament, sufficient Security may be obtained, that the Church of England shall enjoy all the King hath promised; and when, by the Wisdom of the Houses, such an Act is contrived, as will answer the Kings desires of the Universal ease of His Sub­ject, the Church of England will feel as great effects of the Kings kindness, as she can expect, or desire; and by the freedom all will enjoy, there will be no more contests; but who shall approve them­selves most dutiful and deserving of His Majesties Clemency, and Kindness. Upon such a closure, the Roman Catholicks, and Dissen­ters will freely yield to the mutual security of the Church of Eng­land, and that Church will regain its Reputation of Loyalty, and confirm what you promise in her name, of being kind to Dissenters, [Page 44]and a Protestant Prince succeeding, and finding things thus Ami­cably Composed, will reap the benefit, as the whole Kingdom will do, of this happy undertaking of the King.

But on the contrary, if the Majority of the Members of the Church of England in Parliament, obstinately oppose the Kings desires, they will oblige His Majesty to pursue other Methods, and it will give occasion to all such as are no great well-wishers to our Church, to urge its uncharitableness; that rather than it will permit the King to exercise His Prerogative, of being served with all His Subjects, of what denomination soever He pleases to make use of, and that Men of different Professions in Religion, may enjoy the favour of the Kings Indulgence, they will put themselves out of His Royal Protection, and absolve Him from His promise therein; and the upshot of all will be, that by His Majesties steady pursuit of this great work, which He firmly believes will conduce so much to the universal good of His Subjects; In a few years, by such sedulous countenancing all those, who will strenu­ously co-operate with Him to effect it, the Dissenters will obtain the Majority of Voices in Parliament, which if once effected, those Members of the Church of England, who have Obstructed the Repeal, will be at the mercy of Dissenters; and if the King be not their best Friend, may fall short of what they may now so effectually obtain.

I shall conclude with a short Paraphrase upon the Words His Majesty, used to His Privy Council March the 8th. 1686. concer­ning this Indulgence, in which the substance of what need be said, in justifying the Kings granting it, are clearly laid down.

First, His Majesty shows the practice of former Ages, and the success of them; That although an Ʋniformity in the Religious Worship had been Endeavoured to be Established within this Kingdom, in the suc­cessive Reigns of Four of His Majesties Royal Predecessors, assisted by their respective Parliaments; yet it hath proved altogether in­effectual.

This is obvious to every one that reads the History of those times, and well know to those that lived in the beginning of the Rebellion; for Dissenters were then so encreased, that they were numerous, and powerful enough to overthrow, not only the Church of England, but the Monarchy that defended it. The Kings Words are, That the Restraint upon the Consciences of Dissen­ters, in order thereunto, viz. to Conformity, had been very prejudicial to this Nation, as was sadly experienced in the horrid Rebellion, in the time of His Majesties Royal Father. The King then pitcheth upon the true and principal cause of all those Calamities that befel the [Page 45]blessed Martyr, and were freshly commencing again in the later time of His Majesties Royal Brothers Reign, which are best ex­pressed in the Kings own Words, That the many Penal Laws made against Dissenters, in all the foregoing Reigns, and especially in the time of the late King, had rather increased than lessened them.

If therefore our Gracious King, out of an excess of love and Paternal care, did not study the Universal benefit, ease, profit, and enriching of His people, He might have pursued former Pre­cedents: But as a Wise and Compassionate Prince, He searcheth diligently for the true Causes; and while too many are busying themselves in Traducing His zeal for His Religion, as if it were the only concern of His Royal Cares. He Demonstrates to all His Subjects, how much more sollicitous He is to find some better Method, whereby at once He may Establish His Throne, and those of His Successors, in a stable peace and security, and give Ease, Freedom, and Riches, to all His People, of what Persuastion so­ever: Therefore declares, That nothing can more conduce to the peace and quiet of His Kingdom, and the increase of the Numbers, as well as the Trade of the Subjects, (wherein the greatness of a Prince does more consist, than in the extent of His Teritories) than an entire Liberty of Conscience. That His Majesty may likewise obviate all the great scruple such as you raise as if He did this for any private ends; you have His Royal Word to the con­trary, when He tells all His Subjects, That it hath been His Opinion, as most suitable to the Principles of Christianity, that no Man should be Persecuted for Conscience sake, which His Majesty thinks is not to be forced. By this His Majesty shows, that He grounds not His judgement upon the agreeableness, or ungreeableness of it to the interest of any Church; but as it is suitable to the uery Principles of Christian Religion, and having by this shown His Royal Inten­tions how to proceed upon that bottom, during His own Reign, out of a well grounded Confidence, that it may be a rule and standard to His Royal Successors, He closeth all with this Maxim, That it can never be the true Interest of a King of England, to endea­vour to force Conscience.

Have not all Men from hence, and all His Majesties Actions, reason to think, there is a Clemency, Benignity, and tenderness in the King to His Subjects, flowing in His Princely Blood from His Royal Ancestors, and peculiar to the family, which His Re­ligion can never alter; so that where the necessity of His people, rather han His own safety, does not oblige Him to severity, We see daily instances of a Mercifulness beyond all expectation, and even to the envy of others, some of which have been very [Page 46]late: and if this difficulty of the Repeal were once over, all His Subjects would know, that He would deserve the Epethites of Just, Merciful, and Pacifick, as well as any of His Royal Predecessors; having that personal Courage, and Fortitude, over and above what is to be found in few Crowned Heads; so that satis est prostrasse, must be owned by all His Majesties ill-willers, as pecu­liar to His Generosity.

I should here have closed this Discourse, but that I find His Majesties late Speech to the LORD MAYOR and Aldermen of London, when they Presented Him with their late Address, hath occasioned a new Misrepresentation; because His Majesty mentioned the advantages would redound to the Subjects by a general Naturalization and publick Register, which those who suck poison out of every flower, censure as manifest tokens, that if these be effected, the growth of Popery will be promoted, which they thus prove.

First, that Naturilization will open a door, to let in from foreign parts, such sholes of Roman Catholicks, that the Protestants shall soon be out-numbered. Secondly, that a publick Register will so discover all Mens Estates, that the King may easily dispose of them, when the Laws of Property shall be, as now we see Penal Laws are dispensed with.

As to the first of these malicious Insinuations, I desire all think­ing Men to consider, that it is a very known Maxim, that not only the power of any Prince, but the Riches of every Kingdom con­sists in the multitude of the people well Governed. Let us now therefore consider who they are, that are likeliest to flock hither, if an Act of general Naturilization should pass. There are none that leave their own Country, to Transplant themselves into ano­ther Soil, but such as have a Prospect to live more at ease abroad, than in their own Country, and such must be principally those, who retire to avoid Persecution for their Religion, or are obnoxious to the Laws, for some notorious Trespasses against them, or such who dare not show their Heads for Debt; or lastly, those who in the way of Traffick think to better their Fortunes. For it is ridicu­lous to imagine, that Roman Catholick Princes will unpeople their Countries, to send Colonies abroad, unless it were to make War; and to such, I presume, no Law of Naturilization will extend.

I suppose then, no Objections will be made to the incoming of Aliens, but such as do it upon a Religious account. Let us there­fore consider, who they are that can flock hither, because they want the freedom of their Religion in their own Countries? and [Page 47]surely in Europe we can find none, except they are Protestants, that are in such a state under Catholick Princes; and it will be very diffi­cult to believe, they will fly Persecution at home, to turn Roman Catholicks here.

Therefore it appears most manifest, that the only effect such a Law can have, will be to bring from Poland, some parts of Ger­many, Denmark, Sweden, or Holland, the French Refugees, since England is known to be a place of more comfortable Retreat than those Countries are; and if such French, or any other Aliens, were Dispersed, in some proportion, through the Kingdom, and not suffered all to settle in the Populous City of London; there might be hopes, that by their Industry, and Trades, as well as the consumption of the growth of the Country, there would be advantage to the Kingdom by their numbers.

Thus I hope I have made it appear, how directly contrary an effect, to what is suggested, would naturally follow upon a Bill of Naturalization, viz. the increase of Protestants, if of any.

As to the publick Register, it is notoriously known, how attempts have been made in former Ages to have effected this, and it is so far from enabling any Prince to invade thereby the Property of any Subject, that it is the greatest security to them: For by such speedy Transferring Estates, as may be done by a publick Register, even Forfeitures to the Crown may be prevented, when every one, in some few hours, may pass their Estates, Real, or Personal, into what secure hands they please.

It is likewise obvious, how many frauds would be prevented by it, and how much more plentiful Mony would be, when none would be in danger of loosing either Purchase or Lent-mony, by Pre-Engagements; since fewer shifts could be used, to deceive any moderately circumspect person. The Proceedings likewise in Law-Suits, would be less tedious and intricate, and yet many Hundreds of Clerks would find Imployment in Registring, in every County and Corporate Town; and when mony Men could have such such clear Security, not haunted with the Spirit of Forgery, the middle sort of Traders, the Husbandman, Farmers, and all sort of Men, who had honest occasions for ready Mony, might be furnished without so great scruple, which the doubtfulness of Security now occasions.

But these being matters to be Transacted in Parliament, need no further discussing here: Only I thought it necessary to hint these things, that all Ingenuous Men might see, how unreasonable some Mens suspicions are, and what sinister Interpretations, Malice, and Envy, will make, of what is most apparently design'd for a quite different end.

In fine, Would we enjoy the free exercise of the Protestant Re­ligion? We have the Kings Sacred Promise for it; and upon the taking off the Penal Laws and Test, we may have it firmly Esta­blished: Would Dissenters have Ease, they have it freely granted without Terms. Would we enjoy all the advantages of Wealth, Honour, Peace, Plenty, and the Benefits which a Gracious, Valiant, and Wise Prince may afford Us? We may to the height of our Wishes have them; yielding only, that our Fellow-Subjects in general, and those of His Majesties Religion in particular, may be all alike freed from any Force put upon their Conscience for matters of their Religion, at present, and for time to come; while in all other Respects they approve themselves Dutiful Subjects.

FINIS.

ERRATA.

PAge 4. line 23. for reasonable read seasonable. P. 5. l. 23. for gratefully, r. greatly. P. 7. l. 8. for hinder r. hindred. ibid. l. 39. dele of P. 9 l. 10. for such (as Seclusion r. (such as Seclusion. P. 11. l. 16. for Communion r. common▪ P. 16. l. 29. for cumlocution r. circumlocution.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.