As in all ages there haue bene some which haue gainsaid the holy doctrins of god reuealed in his word, so likewise there haue not wanted such as haue resisted the works which he hath wrought befor the children of men.Exod. 7. 11. Against the wonderfull works wrought in Egipt by Moses did those sor [...]erers Iannes and Iambres rise vp, and set themselues with all their diuelish arte and power. VVhen the holy ghoste fell vpon the Apostles in the forme of clouen tongues like fire, euen of those which were eye & eare witnesses thereof, there were some that mocked them,act. 2. 13. saying that they were full of newe wyne. The Apostle Paule hauing cast the diuell out of the Pythonisse, her maisters were offended therewith: caught him & Sylas his associate, and drew them before the maiestrates: who vpon theire incensinge, commaunded them to prison, act. 16. 18. and to be beaten with rods: wherevpon they were beaten fore, cast into an inward prison or dungeon: and theire feete made fast in the stockes. VVhen there was brought to Christ Iesus one possessed with a diuel, blind, and dumbe, and that he had healed him, so that hee which was blind and dumb, math. 12. 24. both spake and sawe: all the people (it is said) were amased, and said, is not this that sonne of Dauid? And vpon the same worke wrought vpon an other at an other time, the multitud marueiled saying, The like was neuer seene in Israel. But the Pharises resisted as other workes of his,math. 9. 23. so both these and said: he casteth out diuels, through Beclzebub the prince of diuels. In a word, the mockinges and scourgings, the banishments, the bonds and imprisonments, the puttinge to death of Christ Iesus, the Prophets, and his Apostles doe testify, how the word and workes of god haue bene from time to time resisted. Euen so it is now: God hauing wrought diuers rare and greate workes, there haue bene some found to withstand them: and to bear the world in hand that all is but connterfeyting and notorious cofenage. Among these the chief are D. Ban [...]xoft B. of London and Samuell Harsnet his chaplaine and Examiners whose labour day and night it hath bene for the space almost of two yeares and in that time haue they applyed and abused theire wit and authority, to perswade this to the world, and to this end haue they published a booke called a-Discourie. 2. tim. 3. 8. But as Paule saith of Iannes and Iamhres that withstood Moses, and of certaine men in his time of corrupt mindes, repr [...]bat concerning the faith, which did then resist the truth: euen so & the same say. I o [...] these men: They shall preuaile no longer, for their madnes shall be euident vnto all men, as theirs also was.
Herevnto serueth as the former treatise, wherein the truth is declared, and these workes published and made knowne to the world, (for the declaration of the truth, is a conviction of the falshood) so the treatise following: wherein the DISCOVERY is fully I trust answered [Page 4] and the euill name raysed vp, and giuen out againste thease workes, viz. of counterfeyting, and my teaching (the some or twoe parts of that booke) taken away. And when the sord shall yet further pursue the manifestation of these workes, disclosing that which is now couered, and making that knowne which now is hyd, which I doubt not but in due time he will:psal. 10. 14. mark. 4. 22. 1. tim. 5. 24. verse 25. Then will their filthines and madnes be euident indede. And for our further assurance [...]crein, we may remember, it is written Thou (Lorde) behouldest mischeif and wrong, that thou maist take it into thine handes. And againe: There is nothing hyd that shal not be op [...]ned neyther is there a secret but that it shall come to light. And againe to this purpose it is said by the Apostle: Some mens sinnes are open before hand, and goe before vnto iudgment: but some mens followe after. Likewise, also the good workes are manifest before hand, & they that are otherwise cannot be hyd. wherby it is playne that howsoener the sinnes of some men are for a time in this world vnknowne, as hauinge bene committed in secret and in the darknesse, yet the Lorde in his time will bring them to light, and manifest them to the world: and on the other side, though the good workes of some be not for a time through the slaunders of some manifest and knowne to the world to be such, yet it shall not alwaies be soe, they shall not alwayes be hyd, but in an other time god will reueale them, to be that indede they are.
It is in the second place to be obserued, that as sathan hath euer vsed by his instruments to resist the doctrines & workes of god that thereby he might kepe god from his glory and prayse, and man from beleuing and profiting by them: so the principall meanes wherby he hath preuayled in all times, hath bene the slaundering of those whom the Lord hath therein vsed as instruments: for the old serpent knoweth full well, that the credit & good name of men being taken away be the doctrines they teach neuer so true and wholsome, & the work wherein they were vsed neuer so profitable and to be admired, they will not be receaued. Neither is he ignorant hereof that let the slander be neuer so manifestly or palpably salfe, yet the world will beleue it and run [...]e away with it as currant, if once it be raysed vp & spread abroad: for he knoweth that there is not one wise man of a thowsand, who vseth to consider of a thing and heare what can be saide of both sydes,pro. 14. 15. before he imbrace it as a truth: and that the foolish will beleue euery thinge. act 24 5, act. 17. 6. Hence it is that in these cases it is his first and chiefe labour to raise vp and spread abroad slanders. By this meanes he preuailed aganst Paule stirring vp some to affirme that he was a pestilent fellowe, a moouer of sedition that he subuerted the state of the world: and was an enemy to the state (as we spake now of some) a tra [...]tor, doing against the decree of Caesar. Yea of Christ himselfe the diuell by his instruments gaue it [Page 5] out, that he was a Deceauer, and worse then so a Coniurer: castinge out diuels through the prince of diuels. By the same meanes that auncient slaunderer,mat [...] 17. a 3. R [...]t [...]. 12. 9. and accuser of the bretheren day and night, both to god and men, who thereby deceaueth all the world, hath hitherto mightely prevayled against the workes of god wee speake of: spreadinge abroade that Maister More and I, especially my selfe: are Deceauors, Imposters, cozoning marchants, that I haue taught some (I knowe not yet howe many) to counterfeyt. But as S. Paule notwithstandynge the aforesaide accusations, was nither seditious nor traytor, but one that practised and taught the contrary: and Christ was no Deceauer but one in whose tongue was found uo guile, neither caste out deuilles by the prince of diuels, but came to destroy the works of the diuell, euē so we in lik māner notwithstanding that we are thus accused to be deceiuers & cosoners, and I knowe not what, and my self to haue taught Somers and others to counterfeyt: yet it shall by gods grace appeare by the sequell, that we are no such men indeede, and that my selfe is not (I thanke god) guilty of any such abomynation, as mine aduersaryes most vniustly lay vpon me. where by the way we may learne thus much, that it is not inough for one to be accused, for then innocency it selfe (Christ Iesus I meane) should not goe vncondemned. Therefore as in all other accusations and euill reportes of our neighbours brought vnto our eares, so in this concerning Somers and mee, if we desire to auoyde the iustifying of the wicked, and condemning of the iust, both which are an abomination vnto the Lord: we must examine whither the things alleadged to that end by the Discouerer doe throughly proue the same or no: otherwise they be but empty words discouering the mallice of the Discouerer. To the furtherance wherof this may serue that heere followeth, wherevnto we will now by gods grace proceede.
This is a meere slaunder for it is as farre from mee and euer was from alleadging this scripture in my defence, as it is from takinge vpon me to worke myracles, and I will as soone doe the one, as the other. Howe this scripture is to be vnderstood of svch as had the myraculous faith, I haue shewed before against Thyreus and the papists peruerting it to their disposiessinge of diuels: and that it cannot be vnderstood of all beleuers as he expoundeth it.
But to procede. In steede of the author his name, wee haue in the end of the Epistle these twoo letters S. H. so that men may onely gesse who hath made the discouerie. VVere the truth on the discouerers side, he woulde sure in playne and full letters haue sett to his nam withont staggeringe, and thereby intimated thus much, Looke what I haue sayd of counterfeytinge, and by Darrell or any other, I such a one: am ready to iustifie the same but the discouerer beinge priuie to his owne false and corrupt dealinge. and fearinge least that woulde be descryed and come one day to light, thought it wisdome to conceale his name: who can tell also how the christian magistrat will take this, when he shall perceiue how greatly God is dishonored hereby and see the intollerable iniurie that is done first and chiefely to the Lord himself. who hath wrought these greate workes, and to whom greate glory and prayse is due for the same: secondly to those whom God (amonge others) hath vsed herein, and those vpon whom these workes were wrought, takinge away the good name both of all those and of others that I could name, as mnch as in him lyeth, besi [...]es the greuious and causelesse molestation of many subiects in the land. and the wrong doune to them both in their substance and good name. In this respect also there is cause why the Discouerer shoulde sett downe two letters, rather then his name: for it is good pollicy to preuent a mischief, and cast for the worst.
THE FIRST BOOKE.
THE 1. CHAPTER.
The nomber of such persons as are said to haue bene dispossessed, by M. Darrels meanes.
M. Darrell growing into some smal credit with the simpler sort:pag. [...]. became very peart & proud. Somthing to this purpose he confesseth some thought that I did glory somwhat tomuch in the action of casting forth diuels.pag. 3. And a little after There are added in the end of the history of the boy of Burton thes words uiz. shortly you shall hane the true story come forth of those 7. in Lancashire that were possessed with vncleane spirits, and all seauen deliuered at one time by this man, meaning M. Darrell as he himself confesseth.
Hereby the Descouerer laboreth to perswade the worlde that I did glory in the casting out of diuels as is playne by these words: what M. Darrell tooke vppon him after this his second exployt, it may be surmy sed by glorying in the first.
To the first of these I answere that I haue not altogither so deposed, as appeareth by page 277. of the Discouery. But admit it were so, and that some haue so thought of me as is sayde, yet it followeth not theirvpon, that I gloryed &c. for many haue mise conceaued the sbeaches & actions of men. when Eliab Dauids eldest brother, heard the words of Dauid concernninge the killinge of Goliah he theirvpon thought, and said vnto him, that he was com downe to se the battle of pride and the mallice of his hearte: and yet it was nothinge so. How oft did Iosephs brethren conceaue amisse of his speaches and actions? To the second I answer, that beinge examined by the B. of L. vpon my oath, [Page 9] whither I thought that by these wordes this man, with the rest were ment my selfe: I answered affirmatiuely. And it being playne that he did meane me, (for who els had to doe with Darling & the 7 in. Lancashire) how could I answer otherwis without periuery? These words also we must remember are not mine but the printers, as I tould the Byshop at my examynation, & at the same time condemed them greatly (both which the Discouerer I warrant you concealeth) how then doe they or my answer vnto them argue my glorying in the actiō of casting forth de uels? Let the Discouerer fram his argumēt & it may be he wil be ashamed of it. Moreouer were it that I did glory somwhat toomuch herein the same maketh not against the cause, but argueth only my corruption.
Darrell being sent for into Lancashire by one M. Starchy dispossessed in the said M.pag. 2. Starchyes house seauen persons at one clap: viz: Iohn Starchye, Margaret Hardman:pag. 323. Elianor Hardman: Ellen Holland: Margaret Byrom and Iane Ashton. And in the end of the discouery the Discouerer hath these wordes: vnto these notable exployts of Darrells, concerning Mary Cowper, Katheryn Wright the boy of Burtou: and William Somers something might be added of his pretended dispossessing the seauen (so often mentioned) in Lancashire, out of one M. Mores examynation and confessyon touching that matter: his sayd examynation is in the Registers office to her Maiesties Comissioners. And if any will take the paynes to pervse it, he shall finde that M. Darrels, and M. Mores course held with those in Lancashire, was as vayne & ridiculous as with any of the other.
VVe heare of M. Mores dealing and mine, about the (pretended) dispossessing of 7. Lancashire and in generall termes of the course we held with them therein, but from these first words vnto these last we heare not what they for their parts did, saue what is intimated by these aforesaid words: so as the reader knoweth not well what to mak or thinke of them, of whom notwithstandinge there is oft mention made, and wither he should account them counterfeyts, yea or no. I desire therefore to knowe of the Bishop of London & Harsnet what theire iudgments of these seauen whither they counterfeyted a possession or were indeede possessed: for one of these sure they did, because they were handled so like to those that are possessed, both in & during the time of their trouble (or so fayned) and at the time and instant of their deliuerance (or dissembled deliuerance) euery one of them crying aloud, being rent sore, and lyinge as dead, or seeminge so to be,math 12. 43. which are the signes of dispossession: Yea after also as wee haue heard in the story, either the vnclehne spirits being gone out, returned vpon them all, seeking to reenter into them againe, according to the Scriptures, or some such thing they fayned. These thinges duly considered, it cannot be denyed but that either they were possessed [Page 10] or dissembled a possession. Yf possessed: it is to be hoped that they are now dispossessed, considering the signes of dispossession mentioned in the gospell were heard and seene at the time and instant of their amendment, and that since that very time, (being three yeares past) they haue continued free from being vexed by Sathan, as before they were, one excepted that is repossessed. The returne also of the spirits doth confirme their eiection. Yf thus it goe & haue gon with the 7. in Lancashire: then we see men may be possessed in these dayes and dispossessed, yea that the greatest part of the persons controuerted were so indeede, and did not faigne so to be as is pretended.
If they counterfeyted, why was not M. Starchy and some other about them, being so many, fetched to London by Purseuants or war rants, as well as sundry from Nottingham about Somers, & diuers out of St affordshire about Thomas Darling? And why was there no commission directed to some in Lancashire, for the better inquirye into this counterfeyting, and sifting of those counterfeyts (if such they be) being 7. as well as one into Darbyshire, an other into Lecestershire, & 3. or 4. (I take it) to Nottingham, for the finding out of the counter feyting of those foure there? Yf these haue counterfeyted with Somers and Darling, why were not they or some of them fetched vp and receyued into the Bishop of Londons house, and by his Lordship and S. Harsnet deposed and examined about their counterfeyting, as well as Somers and Darling their fellowe counterfeyts were? for marke what the Discouerer himself saith in the end of this chapter:pag. 4. touching all these (sauing those in Lancashire) examynatiōs haue bene taken, & as well by the confessions of the parties, as by diuers other circumstances, it doth playnlye appeare, that all which was done betwixt M. Darrell and them was meerly counterfeyted. I demaund now why these Lancashire persons were omitted? why their examinations were not taken, and they tried what confessions they would haue made, as well as Somers. Darling. Kath: Wright, and M. Couper. if these likewise me [...]rely counterfeyted. Surely me thinketh that if these 7. were counterfeits, the Bishop and Harsnet doe hereby greatly preiudice the cause they haue in hand, and them selues. for admit one or two of them were obstinate, and would not confesse a counterfeytinge, yet it may be some of them would. There are sundry of them, and they are not all sure made of one moulde. Some of them also very yong, and it is likely they wold tel the truth moreouer it cannot be that the Bishop and Ha [...]snet taking such great and long paynes about two yeares, day and night, to find out 4. counterfeyts, would [...]aue passed by such a number of counterfeytes, so greate a pray as [...] was, if so be they were counterfeyts. And much lesse would they [...]aue sought out one single counterfeyt Kath. Wright [Page 11] by name, haue deposed and examyned her (with sundrye others) for counterfeyting 14. yeares past, and let all these alone with theire counterfeyting about three yeares agoe, if these were counterfeyts as well as she (is pretended to be) Againe if those 7. haue counterfeited so that we haue not 4. but 11. counterfeyts, considering I dealt with these 7. as well as the other 4. why is there no mention made (not so much as in generalty) of my fraudulent practises and procedings concerning the pretended possèssion and dispossession of these 7. nor any word vsed tending therevnto, as well as or Will. Somers Thomas Darling & the rest euen in particuler and by name? Surely the Discouerer did greatly forget himself to mention my (pretended) dispossessing of 4. only in the tytle of his booke, and in the first chapter of the booke wherein he treateth of the number of such persons as are said to haue bene disposessed by my meanes to name 11. Besides if those haue counterfeyted seing then they are the greatest part of the counterfeyts, and haue not at all bene dealt with for their counterfeyting, it is playne that the Bishop and Harsnet haue but slightly shuffoled and slubbered ouer the matter of counterfeyting wherewith they haue bene wholy taken vp a long time, and left their worke vnperfect: much like to an vnwise builder who not first sitting downe and casting with himself what his house will cost him, falleth of building: but perceiuing after he hath builded a while, that he is not able to fynish that he began, is constrayned to giue ouer his building, whervpon all that behold it begin to mock him: or that foolish man which vnawares buildeth his house vpon the sands, but afterwards perceiuing the same to be no sure foundation, ceaseth to build any further: for this cause I aduise them either to confesse the truth & giue glory to god, or els for shame to proceede on in finding out more counterfeyts, and add to the 4. they haue already those 7. for all eleuen were handled alike: and their condition the same, yea somuch is in effect acknowledged by the Bishope and Harsnet in this whole first Chapter of theirs, and in very manye places of ther booke: otherwise all that heare therof will laugh at thē, and their doting partiallity, that would be so hot and sweat somuch about 4. and let 7. of the same counterfeyt condition passe & escape vntouched. Furthermore, if these 7. haue likewise counterfeyted, I desire to knowe of the Discouerer who taught them so to doe, & that he make him knowne to the world, as he hath done the teacher of the other foure, for why should we not think that they likewise had an in structor, specially seing 5. of the 7. were very yong, and their fevts as admirable & hard to be done as those of the 4 [...] my self (we heare) scholed Somers Darling Kath: Wright and Mary Couper, and seinge the [...] were handled alike to these 4. counterfeyts, and that I dealt with [Page 12] the 7. as well as the other 4. and that 3. of the 4. were helped by the same meanes, viz. by prayer and fasting, or dissembled the same with these, it is in all reason likely, that if I instructed the 4. to counterfeit then I haue done the like to the 7. in Lancashire also: but considering I am not accused thereof, and if I were I trust they would cleare me themselues: it is to be thought that this notwithstandinge, I am free from teaching Iohn Starchy Anne Starchy, and the other 5. who he is then that instructed them, it would be knowne. Iohn and Anne Starchy with the rest would be deposed and examined by the L. Bishop of London, and made to tell who it was, what his name is, that beinge knowne the world might be better satisfied as touching their counter feyting, and he whosoeuer he is, might partake with me in punishment, seing he hath committed the like or the same fault. Lastly if Io. and Anne Starchy: Margaret Hardman Elianor Hardman &c. be counterfeytes, why are they not punished for counterfeyting, considering it is a fault deseruing very seuere punishment, and not to be tollerated or borne with in any, much lesse whē so many conspire & ioyn togither in committing this saide abomination. Thus you see (Christian Reader) in what straits the Bishop and his Chapline haue brought themselues on which hand soeuer they turne them, whither to the right or left. If they say the 7. in Lancashire were possessed, then wee heare what followeth thervpon: if they affirme they counterfeyted a possession, (and the one of these as is afore shewed it is very certaine they did) we see they are little or nothing holpen thereby: [...]lence is best where answeare cannot be made without a braned consience. the onlye thinge I feare is that they will not be drawne to returne any answer herevnto at all: though I haue multiplyed my wordes, and enlarged my penne, and thereby wold prouoke them therevnto.
Iane Ashton is since fallen into the handes of certaine Seminary preists, and hath bene carryed by them vp and downe that country to sundry recusants houses (as certaine ydle men were wont to carry puppets) and by cunning counterfeiting of certaine fits & staying of hirself by the secret dire [...]ti [...]ns of the said preists, [...]. 2. she hath gotten god knoweth what: they by such leu dnes haue wonne great credit, but hir Maiesties subiects haue in the meane time bene shamefully abused.
Thus it is Iane Ashton being with six other dispossesed as wee haue heard, was after (embracing the popish religion) repossessed, & therevpon fell into the hands of certaine preists, who haue carryed her vp and downe the country, exorcising and adiuring the diuell in her after their manner. [...]o [...] fauor to preists then to ministers of the gospell. Now I demaund of the Bishop of London why these Seminari [...] preists haue not bene in all this time committed to prison and punished as well as M. More and my selfe, for besides that they are preists, it is acknowledged (and it is most true) that thereby [Page 13] hir maiesties subiects haue bene shamefully abused, and further it is said that shee stayeth herself vpon their secret directions, whereby it shoulde seme (if one may beleue the Discouerer) that these preists haue taught [...] her to coūterfyt, at least in part, why also is not this notorious coūter feyt punished, that hath had a principall hand in this abusing of hir ma [...]iesties subiects? but it may be she is no counterfeit, for it is saide that through the directions of the said priests shee hath gotten god knowes what: Imagine that it is the doing of some tricks, or as is saide heere the counterfeyting of certaine fits whether she will or not as Mary Couper is brought forth deposing, that certaine speaches of mine (principally) and of certaine women, togither with her experience of the signes of possession in her brother, made her to doe that which shee neuer thought to haue done, and this whether she would or no, so as she could not refrayne: no maruaile then though she haue not bene punished for counterfeyting,pag. 3. 1 [...] and this is the very reason why of 11. counterfeyts (as some call them) none haue bene punished for counterfeyting: no not Somers: who if it were so was an horrible blasphemer, and otherwise most abominable.
OF THF 2. CHAPTER,
The occasion why M. Darrells dealing with Somers was called into questyon at Lambeth.
M. pag. 9 Darrell by vertue of her Maiesties Commission for causes ecclesiasticall being sent for, appeared before the L. Archbishop of Canterbury and others at Lambeth: from whence he was committed to prison, by reson of his absurd and vntrue (but yet very confident) assertions: giuing therby iust occasiō to suspect, that he was but a coūterfeyt: & order was taken for the further examination of that cause, according to the vsuall course by the lawes of the Realme, in such cases prouided. The issue whereof was, that vpon the hearing of M. Darrell, and the depositions against him in open court, before the L. Archbishop of Canterbury, the L. Bishop of London, &c. he the said M, Darrell was by the full agreement of the whole court, condemned for a counterfeyt: and together with M. More (his companyon) who tooke vpon him to iustefy the said Darrell, had otherwise greatly misbehaued himself) they were both of them deposed from the ministery, and comitted to close prison, there to remayne vntill order were taken for theire further punishment.
All I affirmed at my commitment was, that Somers had not counterfited: Let men nowe iudge, whether that be absurd & falce 2. whether so to affirme be herisy: for I was commited to prison for heresy, & other heresy (I then vttered not) & not for teaching Som. to counter feit: which fact was not thē in questiō, no not vntil a month after I had bene in prison: yea by the discouerers owne words, (which be that I was [Page 14] committed to prison by reason of (or for) my absurd and vntrue assertions: it appeareth that I was not sent to prison: for the same cause I haue bene so long deteyned in prison viz. teaching to counterfeyte. 3 Let men iudge, whither for this confident assertion I deserued to be committed to prison. what order was taken and agreed vpon by some in secret, & whither the selfe same that after was put in executiō I knowe not: but that in the examination of this cause there was a proceding according to the vsuall course of this Realme in such cases prouided howsoeuer the Discouerer in generall termes affirmeth it, yet he maketh not the same to appeare in the particulers. Sir Discouerer you affirm indeede that I was iudicially proceeded against by due course of lawe and ordinary practise of the high commission court, according to the lawes in that behalf prouided. I pray you therefore answer mee.
1 First whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course and or dinary practise of that court to deny the coppy of articles, or answers to men convented into that court, whenas vpon their oathes they haue fully & directly answered vnto all such interrogatoryes, as haue bene objected against them? And if this be the due course & ordinary practise of that court: whether doe you knowe the same, to be according to the lawes in that behalf prouided?
2 Item whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course, and ordinary practise of that court, touching the examination of any witnesses against a Defendant, to send forth commissioners into the country, and to authorise any other persons to be commissioners, then such only, as hir Maiesty by her letters patents vnder the Great seale of England, hath appoynted high commissioners? And if this be the due course & ordinary practise of that court, whether do you know the same to be according to the laws in that behalfe prouided?
3 Item whither doe you know, that it is the vsuall course and ordinary practise of that court, that the Commissioners, or other deputed by them, should menace witnesses called before them (as you your selfe Sir Discouerer did) with imprisonment, bringing vp to London, burning of their feete, or with some other kinde of vyolences in case they depose not to their humour and contentment: And if it be soe whether doe you know the same to be according to the laws in that behalf prouided?
Item whither doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course & ordinary 4 practise of that court, to examine witnesses against the defendant, without giuing him notice of the time and place of their production, and so to haue them sworne in absentia partis reae? And if this be the vsuall course and ordinary practise of that court, whether do you knowe the same to be according to the lawes in that beehalfe prouided?
[Page 15] Item whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course & ordinary 5 practise in that court, for such to examine witnesses against the defendant, as haue no authority to take depositions as you Sir Discouerer did at London) And if it be so then whether doe you knowe the same to be according to the lawes in that behalf prouided?
Item whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course & ordinary 6 practise of that court, not to suffer the defendant to minister Interrogatoryes against the witnesses produced against him: And if it be so. then whether doe you knowe the same to be according to the lawes in that behalf prouided?7
Item whither doe you knowe &c. that the defendant, whether he be an adulterer, an incestuous person, or periured person &c. for the clearing of his innocency touchinge the cryme obiected, be not suffered to produce witnesses, and to haue them examyned on his behalfe? And if this be the ordinary practise of that court, whether doe you knowe the same to be accordinge to the lawes in that behalfe provided?
Item whether doe you know, that it is etc. To denye such as are 8 accused of adulterie, incest, periurye, etc. to haue theyre proctors & Aduocates to pleade and defende their cause? And if it be so, then whether doe you knowe that the same is accordinge to the lawes in that behalfe prouided?
Item whether doe you know, that it is etc. to condemne any person 9 as guiltie of any offence, obiected against him, vnder the mouth of two witnesses at the least, and them also to be such against whom by the ecclesiastical lawes no exception maye be taken? And if this be the course of that court, whether doe you know the same to be accordinge to the lawes in that behalfe prouided?
Item whether doe you know, that it is ect. that socius criminis, be 10 admitted for a witnesse against him, whom none but himselfe can accuse? And if it be the ordinary practise of that court, then also whether his testimony of necessitie must be instar duorum testimoniorum omni exceptione maiorum? And whether this be according to the ecclesiasticall lawes in that behalfe prouided?
Item whether doe you know, that it is etc. to deny vnto the desendant 11 the sight of the depositions of such witnesses, as are produced & examined against him? And if it be, whether is the same accordinge to the lawes in that behalfe prouided.
Item whether &c. to commit a minister of the gospell, or any other 12 man to prison without bayle or mainprise, only for absurd and vntrue, though confident assertions? and if it be, whether do you know the same to be according to the laws in that behalf prouided?
[Page 61] Item whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course & ordinary 13 practise of that court, to proceede against offendors in causes temporall? And if it be, whether doe you knowe the same to be acording to the lawes in that behalf prouided?
Item, whether &c. to proceede to the condemnation of anye 14 offendor, by any other proofes, then such only as are warranted by the ecclesiasticall lawes of her Maiesties kingdome? And if it be, whether doe you knowe the same to be according to the lawes in that behalf prouided?
Item whether doe you knowe, that it is the vsuall course, & ordinary 15 practise of that court, to pronounce any finall sentence, or de finitiue iudgment of condemnation for any offence to be committed by the defendant: otherwise then by publique reading of the same sē tence in writing by one of the Commissioners themselues, the other his associats by their consents approuing the same: And if it be soe: whether doe you knowe the same to bee accordinge to the lawes in that behalfe prouided?
And where the Discouerer addeth, that the issue thereof was, that vpon the hearinge of me, and the depositions against me in open court, I was by the full agrement of the open court condemned for a counterfeytte: and together with M. More deposed from the ministery, and committed to close pryson, there to remaine vntill order were taken for our further punnishment:
I demaund of him who was present at this hearing: firste whether I vsed any continued speach then, saue one: and whether in the same I was not cut of. 2. whether being charged to teach Somers and M. Cooper his sister, Kath: Wright and Tho. Darling, I spake any thing in my owne defence concerning the 3, last, one word or two excepted, concerning Kath: Wright, which raysed vp collor in this Discouerer. 3. whether Th: Darling being in the court by the Bishop of L. commaundement, was heard to say any thing touching my teachinge of him, or his own counterfeyting, or not counterfeyting: yea whether euer he or any other affirmed that I taught him to counterfeyte. 4. whereas the depositions against mee were heard then to speak their their fill, so the depositions (of the 17. taken by the 12. Comissioners) which are for mee, were heard to speake at all, either then or at any other time before, though I haue oft and instantly desired the same. 5. whether euer any one of my witnesses, (who haue hundredes to cleare me) were heard to speake either in court, or countre before commissioners. 6. whether if it be as I seme to intimate by these my demaunds, this hearing he speaketh of was likewise according to the vsuall course by the lawes of the Realme in such cases prouided yea or not [Page 17] 7. where he saith we are r [...]serued for further punishment, I aske of him whether this be according to the lawes of the Realme, that we the accessaries (if there were any counterfeyting) shall thus haue punishment vpon punishment, and the counterfeyts (if such they were) nor any of them, be punished at all: as if all the iniquity were in teachinge to counterfeyt, and none in learning and practising the same: otherwise (sure) they should be punished as well as we, and not all the strypes laid vpon M. Mores back and myne. And where it is saide, that I was by the full agreement of the open court condemned for a counterfeyt, it is vntrue. Neither was that or any other definitiue sentence giuen of me. In the end we being commaunded to stand aside (as the manner is) were forthwith after in the open court suspended, and commaunded to close prison there to remayne till we should be are further from thē And so haue we done (saue that we haue not bene all this while close prisoners) wayting when we shall be heard according to the Queens lawes, and be either acquited or condemned. More then this was not done, nor word saide.
They that ymagine Somers was not possessed, but did counterfeyt (saith the preface) doe by [...]onsequence deny the the soueraignty of our Sauiour in that action.pa [...]. 1 [...]. And one of the written pamphlets: to deny the work of the diuels and God in the dispossession of So: may seeme to be after a sorte to deny them in the gospell. Then followeth his confutation, Indeede if M. Darrells credit were as good in saying, that So: was possessed, & that by his and his fellowes meanes he was dispossessed: as the Euangelists and Apostles ought to be, when they tell vs of diuers that were possessed in Christs time, then their said collections were pertinent. Otherwise manye false knaues from time to time, hauing deluded the people with hipocrisy, and pretence of casting forth diuels, it is a suggestion of Sathan for any to colect that thereby the said actions of our Sauiour: and his Apostles, are in any sort blemished: but let them rayleon.
If Somers were possessed and dispossessed (as I trust is made manifest) then are these their collections very pertinent though Darrels credit nor his fellowes, be any way to be compared with the Euangelists and Apostles: neither are the said actions of our Sauiour and his Apostles in any sort blemished by these wordes, as this man suggesteth, no man so collecting: but a man would thinke rather that they be ble [...]dyshed, which will not receaue the possessiou and dispossession contended for notwithstanding it hath so great confirmation from the gospell But let them (saith he) rayle on. Is not heere very perylous rayling? well. If there be not heere, yet elswhere there is, whereby they shew of what spirit they are. And this he doth by setting downe many rayling sentences (so termed by him) which are scattered here and ther through [Page 18] out the Naration and Praeface to my Apollogye: Some of which I will repeate, but of the shortest for breuity sake.
M. Darrell hitherto could not obteyne somuch as patient audience or any iudicyall course of proceeding.pag. 21. Agayne, their proceedings haue bene indirect, contrary to the royall commaundement of her Maiesty, her lawes and lawfull liberties of her loyall subiects, and agayne his iudges became parties, pleaders, and accusers: agayne M. Darrell and M. More are now imprisoned for giuing testimony to the truth. agayne let men beware in creditiug false rumours against those holy men of god, who doe nowe or shall hereafter suffer in this holy cause. Agayne I would aduise them that slaunder this worke, and persecute the seruants of god without cause to tak heede, least they be found euen fighters against god.
Thus we see what rayling the frends of this cause doe vse: let vs now consider, what rayling and scoffing (to let others goe) this mā an aduersary to the cause, and great frend to counterfeiting doth vse: that so comparing the rayling togither, we may the better discerne of it, and of these raylers.
This casting out of diuels is discouered to be but a pure play,A Patorne of Harshents and his Lord, and Masters sobriety contayninge two principall parts of a vyce and a diuell, let them with all their iuglyngs driue out a melancholike spirit, out of any poore soule in Bedlam. Thus much for a taste of diuel driuers legerdemayne: open the curtaine and see the puppets play. M. Darrell is thought by some to be such a one that if hee met with the diuell, he was able to curb him. Is M. Darrell will be a right Exorcist after the currant fashion among the Iesuits: if he want the faith of doing myracles, he may cast his capp at them meaning diuels. when Somers was dispossessed, the deuill was shroudly dressed, he was forsooth so extreamly tormented by the fasting, prayers, and preaching of M. Darrell and the rest, as he had no leasure to say what he must doe, or what he would do, but rudely without taking any leaue of them departed. The diuell was trick [...] with their conceaued prayers. One diuell would haue bene mad at the name of Presbyter, an other at the sight of a minister that will not subscribe, an other to haue seene men sit or stand at the communion. And whoe knoweth whether in time, the naming of a presbitery would not haue had the vertue of a popish relique, as well to cast out a diuell, as to disclose him If their schollers be of the new cut: they cry, they wallowe, they foame, and shew the signes mentioned in the Scriptures.Open thine eyes then good [...]eder a [...]d let thy consience be Iudge who is the Rayler. There Exorcists for want of worke are driuen to their shifts, and like Tinkers walke vp and downe from place to place, seeking to be ymployed. Two points serued his turne instead of iugling slicks, heere is fast and loose as the Egyptian listeth. If the resemblances of Darrells practises to Pedlers be not fit: then as you remember Somers and Darrell colluding together, thinke vpon the pretty feates betwixt Bankes and his horse. So skilfull a catt is Darrell in hunting Darlings mouse▪ here [Page 19] vnto add that he calleth vs diuel flingers, Imposters, iuglers, absurde mates cosoning marchants, false knaues, &c.
A great deale more there is of this stampe: yea the whole boke from the first leafe to the last, is written in such scoffing and raylinge characters, that it might seme rather to haue bene compiled by Nash Pasquil, or some Interlude-maker, then any other of sobriety & iudgment. But the stile is sutable to the matter. And so to returne vnto the former rayling, vsed by such as contend against counterfeyting, and for Som: possession: Let vs see what he inferreth & concludeth thervpon. First, that my frends in so doing shew themselues to be but children, which it is a shame for growne men to be: and that in these wordes These are children iudeede [...] to what rypenes in rayling thinke you they will growe, by the time they be men? To be perrilous children euē the children of the diuell: and this he doth out of Iames It is true (saith he) There is a wisdome whose children by their outward appearance they may be well accounted. pag. 12. Of which wisdome S. Iames speaking saith. If yee haue bitter enuying and strife in your hartes reioyce not, neither be lyars against the truth, for this wisdome descendeth not from aboue, but is earthly sensuall, and diuelish.
I answer him, and vpon occasion of his owne rayling and scoffing, retort this scripture vpon him thus. If it be a truth (as it is most true) that Som. Kath: Wright, and Darling were possessed and dispossessed, that neither they nor Mary Couper haue counterfeyted,Pro. 13. 23. Iere. 13. 2 cor. 13. 8. that my selfe haue taught them no such thing: which this Discouerer auoucheth and contendeth for as a matter of truth, then for-asmuch as he hath bitter enuying and strife in his harte for the falshood (whereof S. Iames speaketh, as the wordes following doe shewe: for contentiō for the truth is lawfull and commendable) as appeareth by his tongue and pen, and is a lyar against the truth: It must of necessitye therefore be, euen by the testimony of the spirit of god, that this Discoverer and such as he, are the children of this earthly, sensuall, and diuelish wisdome: out of his owne mouth then let this man be iudged.
OF CHAP. 3.
How M. Darrells frendes haue sett out the pretended dispossessing of W. So.
The Disc. telleth vs of certaine counnterfeyts, as of a maid of Chester of one Mildred the base daughfter of Alice Norrington: of a Dvtch man with some others. Ergo concludeth he, Somers is a counterfeyt, & that superexcellent wonder which M. Darrels fauourers, euen those of the ouerworne Consistoryan faction magnifye somuch is a counterfeyt and lewde practise.
[Page 20] Consideringe this very obiection is answered, and the absurditie thereof shewed in the narration, this man who taketh vpon him to conrute that saide treatise, shoulde rather haue shewed the weaknes of the narrators answer to this sayd obiection if so he could: then haue taken vp that stale obiection agayne. The narrator hath here tofore answered this argument thus: this followeth not, for we may with as good reason saye many haue not counterfeited, Narratiou in the answer to the 1. obiection. therfore Somers did not counterfeit 2 there could neuer any man counterfeit such thinges as Som in truth hath done. Hereunto I add, that Somers counterfeitinge followeth not here upon, except these thinges withall be true, first that this maide of Chester Mildred the Dutchman ct. counterfeited. Secondly that Som. & they carried themselues alyke: for if Sommers. were handled after a different manner from them, what letteth, that he might be no counterfeite. although they had counterfeyted? Before then this argumente be of any force, the Disc. must shewe: that those Englysh and Dutch folkes [...]e mentioneth, had a variable swellinge runninge all alonge their bodyes. and so of the rest of the rare accidentes whereof concerninge Som. we haue hearde: neither of which he hath perfourmed: And then also it followeth only probably. Againe, if this be a good reason, then is this also▪ I. N. publyshed a booke stuffed full of vntruthes. wherevpon it was called a legend of lyes: therfore. S. H. the publysher of this booke, hath so done.
Moreouer it is certaine that all those the Disc. here setteth down for counterfeits, did not counterfeit, yea I thinke none of them the mayd of Kent excepted. For the mayd of Chester, it is well knowen and to many, that shee counterfeited not. And howe doth he proue the Duchman, (concerninge whose possession and dispossession there is a booke printed,) to haue dissembled? forsooth Samuell Harsnet sayth so a substantiall proofe, and worthy argument sure. He himselfe confesseth that the Maior of maydstone (a towne in Kent) Nicasius Vandersch [...]ure (the minister of the duch church there (and Iohn Stikelbowe, with dyuers others did subscyibe to that pamphelet as he pleaseth to cal the boke aforesaide. The question and doubt nowe is whether we shall beleue this single man, and such also as we shal heare, or these other which I knowe not how many more. After this manner he proueth the rest he nameth to haue counterfeited. Although these had counterfeited it maketh nothing against vs, as hath bene shewed: yet who that is wise will beleue this mans report (for other proofe haue we none,) that they counterfeited, seeing he doth intimate no lesse by M. Throckmortons children, whose vexation by Satan was so manifest and notorius? for marke what is sayde pag. 93. moreouer he had hearde and read (meaninge Som who suerly studied the arte of counterfeitinge) some [Page 21] parte of a very ridiculus booke concerning one M. Throgmortons children (supposed to haue bene bewitched by a woman of Warboyse (wherby he sayth that he learned some pointe, and was not ignorant as [...]ut occasion serued, to ascribe what he list to witches. And this againe the Disc telleth vs in the person of Somers.
It is twise affirmed that Som. learned some points from M. Throgmortons children, they therefore it is to be thought did counterfeit, for from whome are counterfeyt trickes to be learned but from counter feyts, and such as haue that skill in those worthy feyts, as they can act them themselues? And in particuler it is said, that from them hee learned to ascribe what hee list to witches: pag. 9. 7. viz. as they had donne before him. Agayne t [...]e Dis: denyeth that they were bewitched: for if they were but supposed to be bewitched, then were they not bewitched indee [...]e. And yet it is manifest by many of their speaches and actions (mentioned in the printed booke concerning the witches of Warboys specially by their crying out vpon Allice Samuell the witch, they seemed so to be. And therfore if they were not bewitched & vexed by the Deuill they counterfeited. In a worde looke into the printed booke and you shall fynde, that if they were not vexed with vncleane spirits, they were most notorious counterfeyts, and such as before them neuer were, but saith the Disc. they were not bewitched or tormented with euill spirits: confederating with some wicked man or woman there abouts ergo conclude I counterfeyts, and so indeede the Discouerer meaneth: yet he thought it best and most for his safety becaus they were the children of an Esquier, not to say so in playne tearmes: as he doth likewise by M. Starchyes children in Lancashire. He nowe that would fayne haue the world deeme these for counterfeyts, (though for shame he dare not say so) considering whose children they were, the nomber 5. the tyme they were afflicted, aboue 3. yeares, their age being some of them about 9. or 10. yeares ould▪ the sundry impossible thinges to be counterfeyted donne in appearance by them, as theire supernaturall swelling in their bodyes, &c. their supernaturall strength, knowledge, whereby it came to passe (to let other things goe) that one of them (M. Ioane by name) foretould that there should be twelue of them which should be bewitched in that house in one sort or other and named them all, the printed book [...] [...]ol. [...]. being all weomen kind, and seruants in the house, herself and her sisters being fyue of the number, all which proued afterwards very true, for they had all their seuerall greifs, and most [...] of them aff [...]licted in the same sort and manner as these fiue sisters were: & furthermore that those seruants that came in their places, for the most parte of them were aff [...]licted in the like sort as the other, for the space of two years togeather: and that besides two of them M. Ioane and M. Iane Throgmor [Page 22] [...]on were at the Assises at Huntington seene of the Iudge and Iustices in diuers [...]its, and M. Iane in her fit set in the court: both of them before such witnesses greuously tormented, most pittifully to behould: And lastly Alice Samuell (together with her husband and daughter) was not only found guilty by the Iury of bewitching them, but besides did her selfe at her execution confesse that shee had bewitched them, [...] printed bok. and sente her spirit to torment them: Considering (I say) these thinges, and that these (with other) proofes, presumptions, circumstances, and reasons, prouing their bewitching and vexation by the Diuell wereat largedeli-puered before the Iudge, and therefore vpon oath: and after published to the world, and knowne (as it appeareth) to the Discouerer, what a shamefull thinge is it, and intollerable iniury donne to those gentlewomen, and their parents yea to the Iurors and Iustices that condemned the witches, to affirme (in effect) and proclayme to all men, that they counterfeyted? And me thinketh one should not deale thus, and that aduisedly, except he thought that there were no witches, nor diuels, or at least that the diuels haue no power to torment men in their bodyes. But he that will not haue these 5, to be bewitched, but counterfeyts, (from whose counterfeyting Som [...] learned some of his tricks, and so not all of them from me) let him tell me in good earnest in his reply (if he be not ashamed to make any reply) what he thinketh of the Iaylor his man of Huntington, for seeing he was in all respects handled as the fiue children were, it is to be thought that if they were not bewitched nor vexed by the diuell, but did counterfeit, it was so likewise with him. That he was handled alike to them, and therfore their condition alike, appeareth by the euidence of the sayd Iaylor (vpon his oath) gaue, which is set downe in the booke entituled, The Arraignment and execution of the witches of Warboyse: in thes wordes followinge. Then the Iaylor of Huntington gaue this euidence: that a man of his finding mother Samuell very vnruly whiles she was prisoner, at a time chayned her to a bed-poast: wherefore not long after his man fel sicke and in all respects was handled as the forenamed children were, with heauing vp and downe of his body, shaking his armes, leggs and head, hauing more strength in him in his fitts, then any two men had, crying out of mother Samuell, saying that she did bewitch him: and thus remayning in this extraordinary course of sicknes, about 5. or 6. dayes after dyed. If it fall out so that he say that this man counterfeyted too, and learned so to do of M. Throgmortons children (as Som. did in part) I thinke all that heare of it will laugh at his folly, And heere we may obserue how the Dis. to prooue Som. a counterfeyt, beareth vs in hand, first, that Tho. Darling, Kath. Wright, M. Couper, and the 7. in Lancashire were counterfeyts, Secondly the maid of Chester, Mildred &c. In a worde, that all [Page 23] vexed indeede by the diuell, on this side and beyond the seas, among vs and the papists were counterfeyts, ergo (saith he) Somers counterseyted. And this is, his mayne and generall argument. The antecedent or first parte whereof I deny, and doe desire the Bishop and S. H. to proue that, and then I will giue them the conclusion, and all they contend for.
For-asmuch as M.pag, 19. Darrells frends doe so oft alleadge Tertullian. S Cypryan. S. Ambrose. S. Austen. S. Chrisostome, with Prosper, &c. it is not amisse to heare what Kemnitius (writing against the counsell of Trent) saith of this point, Exorcistas ct. They haue transformed their Exorcists in to magicall Inchanters. In times past it was a peculiar guift to cast out diuells out of mens bodyes by the voyce of man, and power of god. And the same guift continued in the church in the times of S Cypryan, S. Ambrose S. Augustine, S. Chrisostome, and of Prosper: Obsessi in templum adducebantur, et saepe communibus ecclesiae precibus liberabantur: The posessed were brought into the church, and were often-times deliuered by the common-prayers of the church: postea illud demum &c. But afterwards (saith he) that guift ceased. If M. Darrell haue againe obteyned it, let him make much of it.
The Dis▪ perceyuing that besides the holy scriptures, the auncent fathers are not only for possession in these dayes, I meane synce myracles ceased, but also for dispossession by earnest prayer: thought good to make shewe of this, that the testimonyes we alleadge out of the auntient writers are peruerted, & make not for vs at all: & why? Kemnitius saith so.
I answere, Peter Marter as greate a diuine as he, (to let others goe) affirmeth the contrary, as before we haue hearde. where is now this argumente, yf I shoulde saye no more? but for our better satisfaction, let vs consider what Keminitius sayth,math. 10, 1, 8. mark. 3, 15. Luk. 9. 1. and how trulye. The same guifte sayth he (meaning that power ouer vncleane spirits, giuen by Christs to his Apostles) contiued in the church in the times of Tertullian Ciprian Ambrose. Aust [...]n, ct. Howe can this be so, seinge to cast out diuels as the Apostles did &c. by a worde is a miracle. & that miracles were ceased be fore there tymes? we may remember that when and to whom this peculiar guift to cast diuels out of the bodyes of men was giuen, then and to the same persons was there withall giuen, to heale euery sicknesse and euery disease. for asmuch then as Tertullian Ciprian, Ambros Augustine, Chrisostom, Prosper, had not the guyft to heale sycknesses and diseases, to giue sight to the blyndect. It can not therfore be that these fathers had this Apostolicall guift, as Kemnitius affirmeth, & the Dis. woulde haue it▪ yea the thinge it selfe sheweth the contrary, and Kemnitius (& the Dis. with him) ouerthroweth him selfe in his owne [Page 24] wordes▪ The possessed (saith he) were brought into the church in the times of those fathers, and were often times deliuered by the common prayers of the churche. e [...]go not by my [...]. Did the Apostles cast out Satan thus? or rather hauinge authoritie ouer the diuils, commauned them in the name of Iesus to go forth, and immediatly they departed? yf these fathers had the same guifte wyth the Apostles, as is here affirmed, why did they not vse it in the same manner, and with like successe that they did. I meane, the present and spedy dellyuerance of the partie possessed? but cast Sathan out after another māner, with more longer delay, greater help [...] then euer the Apostles did or had? For howe [...]oeuer there is not mention made in the scriptnres of all those the Apostles dispos [...]e [...]sed by farr, yet by infallible reasons taken out of them, it is cleare, that the Apostls did not deliuer any that were possest by the common prayers of the churche as it is here said of these auncient fathers, They had a more readie and easie way to driue out the vncleane spirit of what kinde so euer it was.Luk. 9. 1. actes, 16. 18, ct. by a worde, yea some times lesse sufficed. which as it did more set forth their authoritie and power ouer wicked spirits, so it commended also their doctrine and ministrie,actes. 19. 12. It is very likly also that vpon the shadowe▪ of [...]. peter, deuilles went out, actes [...]. 15. 16. aboue this e [...]e [...]ing of satan by praier, espetially beinge assisted therin by others. It can not therefore be that the Apostles did at any time dispossesse sathan by the publique praiers of the church as is here affirmed, and that truly, of those fathers: Nowe what doth these thinges argue but this, that howesoeuer the same expulsiō of Diuels out of mens bodyes continued in the churche, and was in the times of Tertullian Ciprian Ambrose Chrisostom &c. yet the Apostolicall power ouer Diuels, was before tho [...]e times gone, and no man then guifted with that power: If in these deliuerances by the publick praiers of the church whereof Kemnitius speaketh [...]ertullian Ciprian ct. had any pecular guift as it is here sayde: I demaund of the Dis. (for Kemnitius is dead, and he is of his iudgment otherwis he would not haue alleadged him) first, what this guift was, for the the same that the Apostles had (notwithstanding they both say it) it is cleare it was not. 2. why rather one of these should haue a guift in casting out diuels, then the people or any of them that ioyned with them in such expulsyon, seeing the meanes whereby Sathan was cast out was prayer, and that the people present, prayed & intreted god in this behalfe, as well as these their leaders, and their prayers were not in vayne, but as well preuailed with god, as the supplycations & intercessions of their ministers: for what though percase the prayers of these holye men were more feruent, and by consequent auayled more with god, then the requests made by any priuate christian: shall we therfore ascribe such expulsiō of the diuell to one perticular man, and therewithall I knowe not what speciall guift therein? what is this [Page 25] in effecte but to make the praiers of the rest of gods people present [...] as speaches spoken in the ayere, and beatinge it, and such as god rega [...] deth not?. 3. seinge by the Dis. owne secret confession, men were possessed in Tertullian Ciprian, &ct. there dayes, why not now? 4: Seeinge in the dayes of these auncient fathers, men were dispossessed and Satan cast ovt by the prayers of the faithfull. why maye not men be dispossessed nowe vpon the vsinge of the same meanes? were the prayers of gods people then mightie with god to the expellinge of Sath an and are they of no force nowe? or rather is it impossible they shoulde preuayle so nowe, and in these our dayes, as the Dis. because Kemnitius. saith so, will needes haue it? In a worde, what letteth it that men may not nowe in this our time be dispossessed by prayer, or praer and fastinge as well as when Tertullian Ciprian, Ambrose Chrisostome, Augustine and Prosper liued. 2 seinge that in their dayes miracles were ceased, and an end put to them as well as nowe: and that these fathers had no more a guifte to worke miracles, then M. More & my selfe, whome God hath pleased (amonge others) to vse in the lyke work. These questions I desire the Disc. to answer, and I will expecte it at his handes if euer he replie: excepte he be contente in plaine & expresse termes to yelde to this truthe. And thus we see that rather then the Disc, will haue nothinge to saie against dispossession in these daies, he will bring vs yet the error at least of one man: & that he saith so it is inoughe (forsooth,) because he was otherwise greatly learned But howe proueth the Disc, Isa, 8. 20, this out of the holy scriptures? which seinge he doth not, nor I trust can not, it is because there is no light in him, yet wysely must we obserue here what Kemnitius error is, least we shoulde doe iniurye euen to the deade. Herein he said then very truly that the guift is ceased: and very fitly also against the Papist, (against whome he writ) whose exorcists chalenge such a guift, where vp on as did the Apostles, so doe they ad [...]vre or charge the spirits to goe out, only herein he spake as a man and mistooke the matter: first in that he tooke this guift to continue in the church vntill and in the aforesaid fathers times. 2 in that he thought (as it seemeth) that there is no castinge out of Diuels now, becaus that guift is ceased for besides that extrordinarie and miraculus kinde of eiection of sathan, which beinge temporarie, continued only in the churche whiles other miracles lasted, and together with them had an end, which was longe before some of these fathers dayes: There is an other ordinarie and perpetuall. viz. by prayer, or praier and fastinge. By this meanes and after this manner the aboue named fathers in ther times cast out diuels and not by any peculyar and miraculus guift bestowed vpon them, continuinge in the church vntill theire dayes. And thus are or may be [Page 26] euil spirits cast forth at this daye. and whereas he scornefully addeth If M Darrell haue againe obtained it, meaning that peculiar guift to cast out Diuels, which the Apostles had: let him make much of it: I in good earnest answere, that as I haue no such guift nor yet any spetiall guift herein aboue the least of my brethren or priuate christian: so neither euer did I from the first time that I dealt in the dispossessinge of any arrogat any peculiar guift to my selfe. but haue from time to time cast the same as farr from me as I could both with my tongue and pen. 2 by the carriage of my selfe in this action I haue shewed no lesse. and herein may all men be confirmed as by my whole treatise before concerninge dispossession: so by that is here aforesaide: Greatly then are they to blame, which charge me with challenging I knowe not what guift in casting out Deuils:
OF THE 4. CHAPTER.
M. Darrell did of his owne accord (after he was sent for by M. Dee, & M. Starchy) acquaint one M. More with the matter, and obteyned him to be his compannyon in that action.
Hauing shewed the seuerall occasions of that christian dutye Iof chap, 4. How M. Darrell is made a fite instrument to cast out diuiles, then many other. performed to Kath. Wright and Th. Darling, but corruptly. he procedeth in the same vaine to the rest: & in the third place telleth vs how it came to passe that M. More, and my selfe went to those in Lancashire. VVhere he saith, that I went vpon the sending for by M. Dee and M. Starchy, he is deceaued. For a messenger comming vnto me frō these, I refused to goe, & returned that for answer. About some 10. weekes after (I thinking to haue heard no more of it) came an other messenger with a letter from M. Starchy, wherein he was vmportunate with me, beseeching me euen for gods loue to see his distressed children, and an other from M. Iames Ashton a Iustice of peace there by, declaring the manner of their handling, & requesting my paynes to come vnto them. The next day (being the exercise day at Ashby de la zouch where I then dwelt) I made this knowne to sundry preachers, in number about 16. Their resolution was, that I should doe well to goe, and withall they thought it fit (vpon the motion of one of them, not of myne nor it M. Mores) that one of the company should goe with me, to this end principally, that if it should please God to prosper vs in that we went about, the same vpon our returne, and reporte might stand and be confirmed in the mouth of two witnesses. And heereof there be many witnesses. And then I went not vpon M. Dee his letter, so neither did I of my owne accord acquaint M. More (in perticuliar) with the matter as the Disc. pretendeth. And therefore he mistaketh or rather (I feare) wittingly misreporteth this whole matter. [Page 27] But he proceedeth on, to the occasion of my going to Somers.
By the time that So. had his fits M. Darrell was of some name: and besides hauing a sister in lawe in Nottingham, one Mistres Wallis, she was not tongue-tyed, what a man her brother was: and therevpon being vrged by certaine weomen, she writt to M. Darrell a letter importing (saith Mis, tres Gray) that the Lady Zouch, she herself. and diuers other gentlwomen-requested him to come ouer to see the said Somers.pag. 23,
Next to the name I had, the tittle tattle (forsooth) of my sister in lawe, and her letter importing as is heere specified, occasioned my going to Somers. But the truth is this. After So. had bene about a moneth very strangely and greuously afflicted, and that in such extraordinary manner, as therevpon he was suspected to haue an euill spirit within him causing it, Mistres Gray hauing read the prynted booke concerning Th. Darling, and of the aduice there specifyed that I gaue, made relation thereof to one Mistres Beresford, who tould her that I had a sister in lawe dwellinge in Nottingham. Heere-vpon shee was sent for, requested to write vnto me, for my speedy repaire to Som, She refused, saying that I would not come vpon her writing, but said she if you will write a letter vnto him, I will ioyne therein, and subscribe my name vnto it. Vpon this a letter was framed by one Syr Euan; (as they call him) and subscribed by my-sister in lawe, the tennor whereof was this.
Brother Darrell after most harty manner &c. These are not only of my self to request you, but also all the whole towne of Nott, willeth you, & also M. Strilley to take somuch paynes as to come vnto vs to a yonge man for as by the letter hereinclosed, we think he is possessed of some euill spirit: which they hearing of that good guift that the lord hath giuen you and wrought mightely by you, we generally craue your presence and assistance with vs, which we will do to the vtermost of our powers. These are therfore to request you to take the paynes to come with as much expedition as possibly yee may, and thus the lord be with you assist and keepe you now and euermore. This second of Nouember 1597.
Vnder this letter were subscribed these fewe lynes following, which they ment by the former wordes, the letter here inclosed, conteyninge the speciall thinges which induced them to thinke that hee was possessed.
His manner of taking is thus: sometimes it is in one place, sometime in an other: and when we charge it in the name of the father to auoyde. it tormenteth him, and he skriketh and cryeth, and after he is able to speake, he saith he did not skrike. And he saith he seeth diuers likenesses, somtimes a mouse, sometimes a dogge, and it perswadeth him to spoyle himselfe, and them that pray for him, and with other like perswasiōs to giue him a bage of [Page 28] monney, and fyne cloathes, aad to make him richer then any of the towne, if he will but one fortnight let him alone.
VVith this letter came another to the effect aforesaide from M. Aldridge the boyes pastor: when perusing this subscription, I founde diuers signes of possession, whereof some are mentioned in the gospell, others I had obserued in experience: and questioning with the messinger, heard besides of his foming, casting into the fyer, extraordinary strength &c I returned in answer that those thinges being true that they in their letter, and their messenger more at large related vnto me, the boy was vndoubtedly possessed with the diuell: and withal I aduised them to vse the meanes of fasting and prayer for his delyuerance from Sathan: but therein I said they were to spare me, for diuers reasons I rendred them, and to craue the assistance of others of greater guiftes and neerer them then I was. Heerevpon they did wright presently to M. Iohn Ireton. and M. Iohn Browne: the one beinge then from home, the other in his answer aduised them to send for me because of the experience I had aboue others. (besides he M. Ireton I meane wrote to me to the same end) vpon this M. Maior his letter was procured and sent to me, vpon the receipt whereof I went. For thus truly I thought, that forasmuch as sundrye of the inhabitants of Nottingham and among them his maister, his pastor, togeather with the magistrate who were interessed in the boy, called and desired my poore aduice and assistance, it was my part and duty to goe, and to yealde them my best assistance, contrary to that I had purposed and written before, as being called of god to that worke: and hereabout I consulted also with two godly & learned men then in Ashby: who were eue so also perswaded, and whose allowance I had in that I did. I went not then to So. vpon my sister in lawes bare letter, neither doth the same ymport as the Disc. vnder the name of an other reporteth but being instantly requested by such as you heare: and if S. H. stand for Samuell Harsnet as all men suppose and wherof there is no doubt then knoweth he the most of these thinges as well as I: yea almoste no man better: for besides that he hath heard (vndoubtedly) of these seuerall letters (M. Ireton his excepted) many times: he may remember, that he being a commissioner, among other intergatoryes, they had one concerning the occasion of my comminge to Not. and that Mistres Gray and M. William Langford among others being deposed and interrogated thereabouts, answered that M. Maior that then was (viz. M. Peter Clarke) did write vnto me to that end, and that thervpon I came: bending their speach to the said M. Clarke who was present, as being a commissioner, Indeede this part of their depositions was not set downe among the rest as I was shortly after credibly informed. [Page 29] And now let others iudg of M. Harsnets dealing herein.
It is by the way to be obserued that the Dis. himselfe (although in his scoffing vaine (confesseth that I ran not of my selfe to Som. nor any of the rest but haue bene sought vnto: from whence a probable argument may be drawne, that I did not teach him to counterfeyt nor any of the other, For if I had so done for gayning glory to my self in a feined dispossessing of him: surely (after so much paynes taken for sundry yeares together) I would in all likelihood haue winded my selfe by some odd practise and deuise or other into that action, otherwise what had his counterfeyting bene to me, or would haue advantaged mee more then an other? true saith the Dis. and therefore very cunningly you did so. For Som. hath deposed that these wordes you said vnto him in Ashby parke: He also (meaning my selfe) tould me, saith Som. pag. 8. 6. that he hauing a sister in lawe in Nottingham, one M. Wallys, I could no sooner name him when I should be thought to be possessed, but that presently and the rather by his sisters meanes, he should be sent for to come vnto me. This our said meeting in the parke is hereafter ouerthrowne and therby it is manifest that no such speach was there vttered by me. But it is strengthned by Edmond Garland's deposition: Before M. Darrell was sent for (saith hee) I haue bene present twisè or thrise at seuerall times, when Som. pag. 8 [...] hath in his pretended fits vsed these words: Darrell, Darrel Darrell. If the deponent meane of the first sending for me, that he deposeth is false: if of the latter I yeald vnto it: but howsoeuer he mean and others take it, it mattereth not, because it is playne by the premises that I went not to Som. vpon his naming me, but vpon other occasion, whereby the falshood of Som. deposition doth further appeare and Garlands also if we respect the end wherevnto it serueth. moreouer had there bene any such compact betwene Som. and me, why went I not at the first sending for, being especially so solemnly sente for by a messenger of purpose, bringing with him a horse for mee to ryde on (to make sure I should come, as some percase thought) such a letter as we heare, and an other besides from M. Aldridge? But notwithstanding this I sate still, and not only so, but returned besyds such an answer as wherevpon they write to two others as is aforsaid either of whose assistance had they of Nott obteyned, we had neuer heard any thing of my teaching to counterfeyt. who can now in reason ymagine that there was any such compact? could I be sure that I shoulde be the second time intreated, hauing also denyed in twoe seuerall letters to deale in that action? Indeede it so fell out by the prouidence of god (who had therevnto appointed me) but in respect of men by chance. For thus it was. One of the Earle of Huntington's men Maist. Hoult by name, bei [...]gat Nottingham, the Maior toulde him of a purpose [Page 30] pose he had to write by him to his Lord, to be a meane to me, to comvnto them to a boy greatly distressed. M. Hoult answered, that he thought that neede not, for that his owne letter to me woulde suffyce and preuaile so farr with me, his place considered. And herevpon the said letter was made, and sent by him, who was presently to come to Ashby to his Lord, remayning there, where my selfe also dwelt at the deliuery whereof he made this knowne vnto me. And thus much touching the occasion of my going to Som. wherein through the vnreasonablenesse and wresting of my aduersary, I haue bene inforced to be longer then I desyred.
Hauinge begun the studie of the law he perceued therein such greate corruption,pag. 24. as he gaue himselfe to the studie of diuinitie: that so he mighte serue god and kepe a good concience.
The vse of this is to alienate the affections of those which be of this calling from me, and there withall from the caus it selfe. But God is my witnesse that I neuer affirmed any such thinge, neither did the same euer enter into my thought. The commō lawes I hold and euer did since I studied them, to be grounded vpon the lawe of god and reason, & to be of necessarie and singular use in the common wealth so farram I and euer was from condemninge the studie of them, farr therefore was that from me, the Disc. here suggesteth. Only this is true, that when the Lorde (who had longe before purposed to imploye me otherwise, and in the studye of an other [...]aw,) did draw [...]e another waye, by layinge his hande vpon me, in causinge a strange & extraordinary sluggishnes to fall vpon me, being a student of the common lawes) euen then when I was most free and far from the sam I thus thought with my selfe, and it may be I haue some times vsed wordes to this effect, that without all contradiction it were much better for me, to spende my dayes and strength in the studie of the deuine then humane lawe, and to be occupied and labour or worke vpon the soules of men, endeuouringe theire eternall saluation: then about the landes and goods of men and rightinge of the wronge, don vnto them therein which only concerneth this momentary life, and reacheth not to the bodies of men, much lesse to there foules: The welfare and saluation of which next to the glory of god is only worthy to be sought and laboured for: all other thinges beinge mere tryfles in comparison thereof. Besides consideringe seriously of the afore sayd hande of God, vpon me, and of the continuance of my very rare sluggishnes (the lyke whereto I thinke, hath bene seldome founde in any,) notwithstanding my earnest striuing against the same, I began to feare least I did [...] against the prickes, and imagine that the lord sure woulde vse my [...] in some other thinge, and place me in another [Page 31] standinge. And this [...] I (speake the [...]oth in Christ, and lye not) caused me to change my minde, and wars [...] my studye from the law of man to the law of God, & not any corr [...]ption in the same that I perceaued.
His frend forgetteth himself in affirming that M. Darrells life hath bene so searched into, for true it is that diligent care was had and commaundement giuen accordingly, that touching his conuersation,pag. 25. otherwise thē apperteyned directly to his pretended course of casting out diuells there should not any one point, be inquired into: neither was there, as by the acts in record it may appeare, and as it is supposed. M. Darrell will himselfe confesse.
No verily, I am so farr from confessing this, that I am fully assured of the contrary. I haue bene very credibly informed of a serching after the life I led at Cambridge, and by page 95. it appeareth that vppon some inquiry, information hath bene giuen. How I behaued myselfe at Ashby and at Nottingham the Dis. himselfe may remember, that he and an other Commissioner deposed and examyned one Web his wife of Nottingham (at whose house at my first comming I made my abode for a sewe dayes) wherevpon and what moued her to inter tayne me, what speaches in secret passed betwene her and me, what words I vttered in the prayers I vsed while I was there, or to this effect, and not concerning my casting out diuells or Som, counterfeiting or not counterfeyting, concerning which she could say tho least of a thousand: And for [...]asmuch as this fact of the Dis. was contrary to the commaund [...]ment giuen him, and that herein he and his fellowe commissione [...] [...]ent beyond the boundes of their commission, and that the thing he did is in it selfe most intollerable, I desire all men to consider of it, specially, those that be in authority, But what hath the Dis. in all his searching found out? I aske of him whose oxe or affe I haue taken, or to whom I haue done wrong if he can tell let him heereafter declare yt.
But one thing is reported of M. Darrell, which passeth the rest, and maketh it probable (you may not doubt) that God hath geuen him an especiall grace aboue all other Exorcists,pag. 26. now a dayes to expelli diuels, For the say that after a sort, he hath forsaken house, lands, and all for Christs sake [...] which being an Apostolicall resolution, why should not he haue that guifte graunted vnto him? Indeede one is as true as the other.
The reason why it hath bene said as is heere repored is, because, for a preaching ministery sake, and so for Christ and his gospell sake, I changed my habitation: and when I dwelt in my owne house, & vpō, my owne land, in my natiu country, among my kinstolkes and acquayntance, to my full contentment and hartes delight for the thinges [Page 32] of this life, I (through the grade of god) left all these to my losse, & puched my tent in an other coast, and hereof I am not ashamed. And why might not he who knew this to be true, say as is aforesaide? this the Dis. scorneth, being one of those that will neither enter into the kingdome of heauen, nor suffer those that would, He seemeth by his scornfull speaches following, to thinke that there is no forsaking of h [...] use, land, and all to followe Christ, but where one selleth house, lande, and all he possesseth and giueth the mony to the poore, according to the speach, of Christ to the yong man in the gospell, if you will be perfect, sell that thou hast, [...] 19. 21. and giue it to the poore. But to let this error goe, what meaneth the Dis. to call this an Apostolicall resolution? It should seme the answer giue by Peeter concerning himself, & fellowe Apostls, Behould we haue forsaken all & followed thee. But the Disc. must knowe that all this resolution to forsake all and followe Christ is not proper and peculyar to the Apostles, but common to them with all christians, yea this resolution is so generall, as he that is not resolued to for [...]ak house land, yea and his owne life also, and all to followe Christ and his gospell, (u) is not worthy of Christ, marke. 8. 34. and cannot be his disciple. Thus saith our Sauiour,marke. 8. 34, (u) whosoeuer will followe mee, let him forsake himself, that is, resolue with himselfe, or be willing and ready to lose or lay downe his life for my sake whensoeuer I shall call him there-vnto, which hee must dayly expect: much more house and land and all things besids: and againe, if any man come to mee, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, Luke. 14. 26. and children, and brethren and sisters, yea and his owne life also he cannot be my disciple. And here-vpon ymediatly after, he compareth him that is not resolute and ready to forsake life and all, and to endure whatsoeuer persecutions can befall him for Christ's sake, and yet professe himselfe to be Christ's, to a rash and foolish man, that beginneth, to builde, but is not able to make an end, and to an vanduised king, going to warre against an other, who will neither send embassage and desire peace, neither yet is able to meete him that commeth against him: and then concludeth the same thus: so likewise whosoeuer he be of you, that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. Yea obserue I beseech you heere, how by the next wordes following these of Peter (whervpon it must needs be the Dis. gathereth this resolution of forsaking all, to be Apostolicall) this is manifestly conuinced. For when Christ had vpon occasiō of Peeter's words, tould him & the other of his disciples, what reward they which had thus forsaken all & followed him should haue, that they should sit vppon twelue thrones & iudge the twelue tribes of Israell: there he sheweth that neither this forsaking of all, nor reward, is proper to them his Apostles, but common to others, saying: And whosoeuer shall forsake houses, or brethren, orsisters, [Page 33] or father or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name sake, hee shall receaue an hundred fould more, and shall inherite euerlasting life. As it Christ Iesus had said, not only you my Apostles, but whosoeuer els shall forsake all to followe mee, ma [...]h. 19. 19. marke. 10. 1 [...]. Luk, 18. [...]. shall haue the same recompence of reward with you. And this is expressly set downe by the 3. Euangelists, which argueth a greater ignorance in the Dis. From this resolution to forsake house, lands, and all for Christs sake. which I would be sorry I had not: he concludeth me to haue or to pretend to haue the Apostolicall guift, meaning, the same guift to cast out diuells and power ouer vncleane spirits,By this worthy collection of the Disc. Lethu [...]. Ridley, Cram [...], & those worthy men in [...]. Maye time, the must needs haue the Apostolicall gift of casting out deuills, because they forsoke all for christ & his gospell sake which the Apostles had. And marke what he addeth. Indeede one is as true as the other. But I say who shoulde knowe better then he, the one is more true then the other, and that the latter is as false, as the other is true. But to leaue my self, what saith the Dis. to many thousand (a) martyrs in former ages, who had not only this resolution, but did indeede forsake house, land and all yea theire owne liues for Christs sake: were they all Apostles, and indewed with that Apostolicall guift, by a worde to cast out diuels, and by consequent to worke other miracles? Thus we see that whiles the Dis. in moc kage blundereth out Apostolicall resolution, and Apostoliicall guist, he deliuereth doctrines rather Apostaticall then Apostolicall, I meane, such as can in no sorte be drawne from: nor agreeing with their holy writings.
Will you knowe how he hath forsaken all to followe Christ? Hauinge two or three houses, and a litle land in Mansfeild and elswhere, left him by his father, he sode the same, and since bath liued vpon the moneye, (being as one of his frends saith) fiue or sixe hundred poundes.Pag. 26. If then to sell land and liue vpon the monney, be to leaue all, and followe Christ, and afit noate of one that can cast out diuels, wee shall not wante men of that trade: many vsurers in England will prooue good Exorcists.
It is cleare that howsoeuer he doth not in plaine tearmes call me vsurer, yet he doth intimate somuch, and would haue men so to accounte of me, But I desire all men seinge it is not so, to be better perswaded of me, and not to giue [...]are to this his false reporte. True it is that after certaine shorte leases which my father left me were expired, (which were worth yearely three times more to me then my lād I sould that little lande I had, as beinge not able of the annuall rent there-of (spetially in those deare yeares) to mayntaine my selfe and familie, hauinge 5. children. But it is as true, that presently with the same moneye I tooke a farme in Ashbie-delazouch, and bought some store of sheepe, kine, horses, oxen, with other thinges appeartayninge to husbandry, for the mayntēnance of my houshould, which both religion and nature taught me to prouide for. And these thinges are well [Page 34] knowne to many. It is plaine then that I neither soulde my land to that end the Disc. pretendeth, neither being sould did liue vpon the money, that is, let it forth to vsurie as vsurers doe. I am sory thus to trouble the world. with the readinge of my priuat affaires, but that the vnresonablenesse of the aduersarie and his sclanderous tongue doeth there-vnto enforce me, in the iust defence of mine owne innocencie. But hath not the Disc, hore faithfully kepte his promise, in that he saide he would not meddle with my life or is he not taken tardie, in that he saied he had not searched there-into.
OF. CHAPTER 5.
How M. Darrell knewe Som. and the rest, to be possessed.
M. Darrell affirmeth that Christ did not ordeyne any meanes to know who was possessed in the apostls time:pag. 2, 7. but left that to be discerned by the maner of theire sitts, and so sraming his iudgment accordingly, he saith: that the only meanes whereby now men are descerned to be possessed, are: the signes which are mentioned in the scriptures.
I neither doe nor did say that the Apostles did by no other way or meanes discerne who were possessed, then by the manner of their vexation by sathan, which he calleth heere the manner of their fits, for it may be that some times they knewe somuch by some present and extraordinary guift,act [...]s 26, 26. and so it is likely that Paule knew the Pythonesse to be possessed, and therefore I saide that the only meanes whereby NOW men are discerned &c. but this is it I say, that Christ did not ordeyne any such meanes, for then we shoulde haue it in the Scriptures, and such ordinance there I dare be bould to say we haue none. Besids what needs Christ to haue ordeyned any other meanes for the disceerning of the possessed, seeing by their manner of handling in theyre fits it was so manifest, and a difease so easy to be knowne, that the comon people, yea euen the simple women could discerne thereof, as hath before bene shewed?vers. 10. yea but saith the Dis. there is such an ordinance: for in the 1. to the Cor. Chap. 12. among other guifts, there is mention of one, called discretio spirituum, the discerning, of spirites: which saith the Dis. was a measure of gods spirit to discerne betwixt counterfeyts, and such as were indeede possessed. math. 7. 15. math. 24 24. & vers. 11. But we must knowe that the holy ghost meaneth hereby an other manner of guift. (u) Beware (saith Christ) of false prophets, which come to you insheepes cloathing but inwardly are rau [...]ning wolu [...]s. [...] cor. 11. 13. chap. 4. 1. And againe * thore shall arise false Christes, and false prophets, and shall shew greate signes and wonders, so that yf it were possible they should deceaue the [...] elect, And S. Paule speaketh of (v) false Apost les which were deceiptfull workers, transforming, themselues [Page 35] into the Apostles of Christ: and of Sathan his ministers, transforming themselues as though they were the ministers of righteousnes. And S. Iohn saith thus: Dearly beloued, beleue not euery spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of god: for many false prophets are gone out into this world. All these beare the world in hand that they haue the spirit of god, and teach the truth, or true and only way to saluation, whereby they deceaue many, and yet it is not so.1 T [...]. 4. 6. 1. Tim, 4. 1. He now that is in-abled of god to discerne the false prophets, and false Christs, from the true, and put difference betwene (v) the spirit of truth, and * the spirit of error: he I say and all they haue this guift, called the discerning of spirits: which is common to all the elect. But he that herein hath an excellency and sharpnes to discerne the same aboue others, may fitly be said, and I thinke most properly, to haue this guift, In this guift Peter (as it is probable.) excelled Philip in discerning of Symon Magus. This guift they also may be said to haue, which can best discerne betwene those who though they preach the truth,1 tim. 1. 4. & 4. 7, & 6. 20 2 tim. 2. 14, 16, 23. titus. 3. & 1. tim. 6, 3, 4. 5. yet they mingle the same with vayne and vnprofitable doctrines (which Paule calleth fables, prophane & ould wyues fables, prophane & vaine bablings, folish & vnlearned question [...]c [...]. bidding vs to stay such doctrines, to put away such, to auoyd such, and to seperate our selues from such teachers:) and those which be good and profitable vnto men, the wholesome words of our, Lord Iesus Christ, & the doctrines which be according to godlynes. This is it that the spirit of god meaneth by the discerning of spirits, and not a guift or measure of god's spirit, whoreby to discerne betwene counterfeyts, and such as were inder depossessed, which neuer any dreamed of before the. Disco [...]erer. And no maruaile. For there is no such difficulty to discerne betwene counterfeyts and the possessed indeede. VVhosoeuer looketh into the gospell and considereth of the manner of their vexation by Sathan, who are there saide to haue bene possessed may easily knowe when one is possessed. No phisitian can so easily and surely discerne the disease of his patient by pulse, vryne, and other signes: as a christian man of vnderstanding, may by the signes of Sathan his possessing one, discerne of possession. And reason will teach men to discerne of counterfeyting viz. whether. those thinges they behould can possibly come [...] ther from nature, or arte.
It is also to be obserued that the Dis. speaketh of the time: past, and not of the time present: I would be known [...] (saith [...]e) what that guift WAS, he doth not say, what that guift is, and againe, [...] to discerne betwixt counterfeyts, and such as WERE possessed, he saith not such as are possessed: whereby it is playne that in his opvnion th [...] guift whereof he speaketh is gone, so that none is now able to discerne betwene a counterfeyt, and one possessed. Howe is it then that the [Page 36] Dis. taketh it vpon him to iudge that Somers and the rest be coun [...]terfeyts. VVhat fooles doth the Dis. make of men? and what a difficult thing is it forsooth to iudge in this case? Surely he thinketh th [...] none can be now possessed, and then no maruaile though his guift b [...] withered, for to say (men at this day being possessed) that none [...] descerne, whither they counterfeyte or no, it is too absurd to speak [...] of.
OF CHAPTER 6.
Of M. Darrell's knowledge. who sent the diuell into Somers and the rest.
All the diuels that M. Darrell hath hetherto encountred,page. 36, were sent by witches (as it seemeth) into his patiens. Whether witches can sende diuels into men or weomen (as many doe pretend) is a question, among those that write of such matters: and the learneder. and sounder sort doe holde the negatiue, against whome Thyreus opposeth himselfe, and with Thyreus M [...] Darrell.
It is the Lorde (if we speake properly) that sendeth diuels into men. Shall we receaue good at the handes of God (saith Iob) and not receaue euill? meaning,Iob, 2, 10. the euill of punishment. And the Prophet Amo [...] Shal ther be euil in a citty & the Lord hath not done it? chapter [...] 3, 6. That then I mean and assirme is this: that Sathan being sent of god and so permitted, to enter into one, as sometimes he was into Darling Somers &c. the diuell being thus sent, stirreth vp the corrupt affections of some, with whome (as I may say) he hath some familiarity, and laboreth to brīg them to hate that same persō, and in that hatred, after their accustomed manner, by him or his ministery to be reuenged of the party. And whereas without this, he is to enter into and possesse the said person, and will: yet taketh he oft this course, that thereby he may draw men to synne, which is the very worke and labour of his handes, and (as by his practise it should seeme) to shame and punishment withall: for not only with our afflicted persons, but others also, as one Margaret Herison of Burnham vlpe, (concerninge whose vexation by Sathan there is a booke printed) M. Throgmortons children, with sundrye more, either possessed, or otherwise vexed by him, the diuell so ordered the matter, as that the party, or partyes, whome he had before stirred vp to ioyne with him in the afflicting of them, he discouered and made knowne to the worlde: and this wee may well thinke hee doth to this second end, because it is his manner to bring one first to synne, and the synne being perfected, to chasten them to shame and punishment, as he did by Iudas, neither is it to any purpose to obiect that witches are very simple folkes, and know not what belongeth to possession for that they direct not the spirit therevnto, but speake [Page 37] only to their spirit or familiar, of tormenting the party whome they hate, (as appeareth by their confessions) the diuell of his owne accord entring into the parson to be possessed, vnto which fact and sertuice the lord himself hath indeede appoynted him. And where the Dis. saith that the learneder and sounder sort doe holde that witches cannot send diuels into men, if he vnderstand not by that he calleth sending, as is aforesaide, he saith nothing against me, nor to the matter: but if so as I ymagine he doth, then I demaund of him, who I know consenteth heerein with these greate learned men: why witches and their familiar spirits may not aswell agree togither in this speciall case as in others where Sathan killeth men, or beasts, or strangely vexeth them by some externall operation, which we call witcheryes? seeinge all is meerely a tormenting of the body by Sathan, the difference lying in the manner of it, which I trust is by the witch left to the will and discretion of the diuell? as this latter we all knowe is confirmed: by the confessions of thousands of witches and that in all ages from time to time, so is this other also by the confession of some. Yea but saith the Dis. to obiect the confession of the witches is to no purpose, and is already answered by the former learned men. His words be these: And touching the confession of the witches themselues▪ pag. 3 [...] that may be lefte well inough to such learned men as haue written sufficiently of it.
I desire now to know of the Discouerer who haue made answer to the confessions of the witches themselues, but they that hould that there are no witches as Wierus and Scot, which are the sound and learned men he here speaketh of, for these men maintayning this false position that there be no witches, must needes answer to the confession of the witches themselues: which euery one would obiect. And this saith he these lerned men haue done sufficiently: whereby it is playne that this man is of the s [...]me opinyon with them. But he thought it wisdome not to say so [...] playne termes, least he should prouoke the reuerent Iudges of the land against him, for that so saying he made them guilty of innocent bloude.
It is to be remembred that howsoeuer in plaine and express [...] wordes the Disc. doth not affirme, that none can in these dayes be dispossessed, yet in effect he doth it vnder the name of [...]. So albeit he doe not saye that none can be now possessed with diuels yet consideringe his couert carriage of him-selfe there-in, not once grantinge (I warrant you) in all his greate volume any such thing [...], and that he will haue all the possessed persons among vs and the Papistes also counterfeits, as appeareth by this his first bookes who can cōiecture any other, but that he holdeth, that none can be as this day possessed? In like-sorte I say, be doth here by witches, not plainly denyinge [Page 38] any such to be, but secretly insinuatinge as much to the reader Thus wee see he doth deny (but couertly dispossession of diuels. 2. possession with diuels. 3 [...] all compact with diuels to the hurt of others [...]f he proceede but one stepe further, it wil be couertly to the deniel of diuels. VVell this I dare be boulde to say of the Disc. whosoeuer he be: that howsoeuer he professe that he beleueth in god, and that there are diuells, yet by this very worke of his, (this Discouerie. I meane (he denyeth both.
OF. CHAP. 7.
OF THE CAVSES PRETENDED, WHY MEN ARE POSSESSED.
Alyce Goodrig of Staphenhill in Darbishire, hauinge a spirrit called Minnye in the likenesse of a dogge, partie colored, red and white, did send [...] the same to torment,pag, 37. Thomas Darling: the seauen in Lancashire were (as it semeth) possessed by the meanes of one Edmond Hartley.pag. 41. and a little after: But Thomas Darlinges veniall sinne exceded the rest: for he meeting Alice Goodrige in a coppice, did let an escape (as the book tearmeth it which shee taking to be done in her contempt, vsed these wordes, Gip with a mischife and fart with a bel, I will goe to heauen & thou shalt goe to hel. And there-vpon her Minme entred into him.
Howsoeuer the Disc. derideth this reported in the booke of Darlinge, and no maruell, seeinge he is perswaded that there are no witches: yet there is in reason (how strange, and incredible so euer it seeme to carnall reason) to perswade vs to receiue it for a trueth, for first we haue Alice Goodrige the witch confessinge this of her selfe and that sundrie times 2. the circumstances mentioned in her confession are true▪ vpon such a day sayd she, I met Darlinge, in such a place or wood called the coppice and the boy leting an escape, as the booke termeth it, I mistaking the boy for one Sherrats boy, who had before broken me a basket of egges vsed these wordes: Gip with a mischeife &c. and there with-all bad my Minnie goe and torment him: who after returninge vnto me, said he had done soe. Consideringe now that it is very true and knowne so to be to others, that this Alice m [...]t Darlinge vpon the daye and in the place named, that Darlinge then and their did, and Sherrats boy also before, as is here specifyed, and that she vsed these wordes aforesaid, and lastly that the very same night D [...] ling began to be sicke and so continued worse and worse, vntill [...] as euident as the daylight at noone, that he was tormented by the diuell: who (I say) consideriug these things, can in reason otherwise [...] thinke, but that shee saith truly concerning her sending of her Minny to torment Darling. As then it is certaine, yea so certaine as without blushing it cannot be denyed, that Darlinge was tormented by the [...], so it is hereby very playne that Alice Goodrige did there abouts [Page 39] confederate with her familiar spirit. Moreouer in that we reade the like of others we are thereby to be confirmed herein. Alice Samuell a witch of Warboyse confessed (as is set downe in the printed booke) that shee sent her spirit called Pluck, The [...] & execution of, the witches of, warboyse. to M. Throgmortons children, and willed him to goe and torment them. And that they were tormented by the diuell, euen 5. of his daughters, it is notoriously knowne, and so generally receaued for truth, as the Dis. himselfe dareth not deny it, though fayne he would, as appeareth by his nibling at them. If this now were true, that Alice Samuell saith of herselfe: why shoulde not the like confessed by Alice Goodrige of herself, be also true? And yf the one of these strengthened especially by sundry circumstances we can all of vs beleiue: why should we not credite the other also, confirmed by as many, yea more and as strong circumstances as the other [...] But what is it that offendeth the Dis. somuch and maketh the confession of Alice Goodrige so incredible, yea ridiculous vnto him? doth this offend him, that shee sent her familiar spirit to goe and torment him? or this, that she was so malitious and cruell vpon so small occasion? or this, that her spirit was in the forme of a dogge? or this, that her spirit had a name, ( [...] M [...]y) agreed vpon I meane betwixt them? or this, that the deuill did vsually (as it should seeme) appear vnto her like a little dogger or rather all these, and especially that any man or woman should haue such familiarity & entercourse of speach and thus compact or confederate with the diuell? Least these should be as stombling blockes in our way, as it shoulde seeme they are in the Discouerers: let vs add to that is aforesaide, these twoe thynges. First, that his last, which is the strangest and indeede all in all, is according to the scriptures: and that some of these rest haue likewise in the generall, though not in the particuler, confirmation from the holy scriptures, for by them it playnly appeareth, that among the sonns and daughters of men, there are some which haue familiarity with diuels, haue speech and compact with them about this and that action,chap. 28. 7. Heerevnto serueth that in the first of Samuell [...] that Saule repayred vnto, is said to haue a familiar spirit. And in that the diuell at her call, appeared vnto Saule in the likenes of Samuell, and had speach with him: what should let vs to thinke, that if not always yet somtimes, and when she would, the diuell [...] vnto her in this or that forme and had [...] are said to worke with spirits, [...] and they confederate in the same workes, and therefore (no doubt,Levit, 19, 31. Lev, 20. 6. this phrase or manner of speach is vsed, [...]shall not (saith Moses,) [...]gard them that worke with spint [...]. [...] worke with spirits. The second thing to be obserued is, that not onlye [Page 40] Alic Samuell but thousands other haue confessed the like, as strange, and incredible as these of Alice Goodrige, and the truth of the same haue bene confirmed by many circumstances, wherevpon these kind of people, (witches I meane) haue receaued the punishment due to such malefactors. Neither did this Alice Goodrige escape vnpunished: but was for this very fact and no other committed to Darby gayle by a lustice of peace, found guilty thereof by the iury, and by my Lord Anderson adiudged to ymprisonment, where since she dyed. Nor yet Edmond Hartley who after he was found guilty by the iury, was adiudged by the Iudge to death, and accordingly executed. Now if this concerning Alice Goodrige and Darlyng which was the very euidence giuen at Darby against her, be a meere iest & ridiculous matter as the Dis. maketh it, and that indeed there was no such thinge, (this Darling being as M. Harsnet would haue it a very counterfeyt boy, and in that respect also the case nothing so in truth) who seeth not, that to make the best we can, he doth thereby condemne, Iudge, Iustice, & Iury of simplicity: and he is the only man (forsooth) that hath had a true and thorough insight into this matter. VVhether this man be in the Premunire that hath so directly and publiquely impeached the iudgment giuen by the Queenes Iustices against the salde Alice for bewitching of Darling, specially sentence beinge giuen heerein, I desire the reuerend Iudges of the Common Lawes of England (who can best iudge heereof, and whome it cheifly concerneth deliberately to consider. And if it fall out so that he be not in case of Premunire yet sure it is such, and so notorious an abuse, as they I trust in theire wisdomes will see redressed.
VVhere in this chapter the Disc, calleth Thirens my Maister & in this whole first booke of his semeth to match vs together,Pag. [...]. as maister and scholler: and in many places doth pretende as though I had learned I knowe not what from him: surely he greatly forgets himself for wel he knoweth that in other doctrines, I dissent a litle more from the Iesuite and the rest of that generation then he, for all his glose and faire shew in this his booke, and therfore it is very vnlikly that I should so throughly agree with him in the doctrines of possession and, dispossession, as vsually the master and scholler doe neither can he be ignorante here-of, who is so well studied in Thireus, that Thireus, his treatife from which I should learne forsooth all my skill, came to light, an. 1598. which was after all our 10. persons were dispossessed, and, the saide booke not to be had in Englande, vntill after I was in in the, Gatehouse (that I knowe of) and therfore it can not be that I learn [...]d any thinge for my practise hitherto from him. except I wente beyond the seas vnto him, and had it from his owne mouth. But I maruell [Page 41] where this first booke of the fiue had bene, if Thireus booke had not come to the Disc. handes, before this Discouerie came from them: for whosoeuer hath read Thireus, may easily see, how that as wind filleth a bladder, and so maketh it bigg, which in it selfe is little: so hath Thyreus treatise of Demoniakes made the first booke of the Discouerers to swell greatly.
OF CHAP. 8.
Of the meanes alleaged by M. Darrell and others, whereby men are dispossessed.
The ordinary meanes ordiyned to continue in the church for the casting out of diuells M. Darrell maketh to be very ancient.Pag. 42. For he saith: that it hath bene in the church since the fall of Adam.
Seing this meanes hath not only continued in the Church since Christs time, but was before, as may be collected out of the * Scriptures, and that we reade not of the first ordeyning of any such meanes: why may we not well thinke,math. 12. 27, actes, 19. 13. that as god in mercy left and ordeyned meanes in nature, for the curing of the naturall diseases and infirmityes of mens bodyes, euen from the time mans body was subiect, vnto them: so he did appoynt this supernaturall meanes, for the healing of this supernaturall disease, from the time it also was subiect thervnto, which is the fall of Adam, But saith the Dis. Heerein Darrell hath no great certainty, for he confesseth that there is no mention in the olde testament, of the institution of that meanes. And so of likelihood men were possessed from time to time during the space almost of 4000. yeares, God himself hauing ordeyned no wayes to cure them. Out of my own mouth and confession, he pretendeth to conuince me. But marke how vnskil fully he doth it.pag, 42. Darrell himself confesseth, that there is no mention in the olde testament of this meanes, which he saith hath bene in the church synce the fale of Adam: by his saying then it is likely, that men being possessed about 4000. yeares, god ordeyned no way to cure them. He should haue inferred of my said confession, men therefore being possessed about 4000. yeares god in writinge left no specyall or peculiar meanes all that time for the curinge of them, but instead therof he concludeth as we heare. But let vs take the argument as he himselfe hath framed it: In the olde testament there is no mention of this meanes or medicyne to cure the possessed. Therefore from Adam to Christ thers was no such means or medicine ordeyned of god to heale them. I answer, that the argument followeth not, as may appeare by that which followeth. In the olde testament there is no mention of speciall means or medicines to cure feuers, or other diseases, therefore. God hath ordeyned no meanes or medicines to heale men so diseased. And heere I might proceede to a thousand [...] The reason why this consequ [...]ce is not good [Page 42] is, because many yea almost insinyte thinges are decreed in the secret and aeternall counsell of god, and knowne so to be of man, which are not set downe in his reuealed will: so that although there be no ordinance as touching the healing of the possessed by prayer, or fasting and prayer mentioned in the ould testament, yet notwithstandynge the same might well be a meanes ordeyned of god for the cutinge of such. Sec [...]n [...]ly, we may assure our selues that god reuealed many of his ordinances to them which liued vnder the lawe, which were not set downe in the scripture of the olde testament: because how soeuer now to vs vnder the gospell, and in the last dayes * god speaketh only by his sonne, h [...]b 1. 1. bidding vs * h [...]are him in his word * and ministery, so as at this day for our information in the Lordes will and pleasur with man,ma [...]h, 17 [...], [...]uke 10, 16. we are to goe to the holy scriptures only, and the ministers of Christ deliueringe, that which from them they haue receiued: yet at sundry times and in diuers manners god spake in the olde, times to our fathers, besides by the scripture of the old testament, as by his prophets, by dreames and,h [...]b. 1. 1. visions, and by vrim: well therefore might prayer and fasting be, not only the ordinance of god for the castinge of Sathan out of the bodyes of men, but also reuealed and made known to be such to the Church of god then, albeit the same were not mentioned in the old testament. [...] Sam. 28. 6. From this argument the Dis. procedeth to a second, wherein also there is as little art: taken from the testimony of Thyreus, and that he doth in these wordes.
But in saying that the same meanes doe continue nowe in the church, that were in vse before the comming of Christ:pag. 43. that his maisters the popish ex [...]r [...]ists, will condemne as an error in him. For one of them saith, that the wayes of casting out diuells in the olde Testament,Thereus pat, 3. cap. 41. iam vetustate, si non alia de causa antiquatae sunt, et abolitae, as being growne in dotage, are nowe abolished for their age.
Behold his consutation. Surely this man was barrayne of arguments, otherwise he would neuer haue run to Thyreus for so absurd a one as this is, to conuince me with. If he had produced the testimony of an antient father or late writer he had said something: and yet it had bene argumentum in-artificiale, an argument wherein were n [...] art at all, especially in a matter of religion, which is to be decide [...] by the holy scriptures and not by the writings and opynions of men. But for the convincing of me a minister of the gospell, to produce the say [...]g of Thyreus a Iesuite and such as hath neither sap nor sauour in it, is to beate the ayre, & not to dispute. Thus he may as well connince me in not so fewe as an hundred seuerall points of doctrine, as the nō ber of sacraments, the presence of Christ in the bread and wyne, &c. wherein the Iesuite dissenteth from that which I with the church of [Page 43] god doe hould and maynteyne.
M. Darrell holdeth that in the Apostles time, there were two sortes or kyndes of casting out diuels, the one ordinary, which was in the church before the comming of Christ:pag. 43. viz. fasting and prayer, and the other extraordinary, [...]iz. commaunding of Sathan to depart in the name of Christ.
Of this latter kinde of eiection of Sathan there is no question, the doubt is whether the first was in the church in the Apostles time and that resteth to be discussed. Seeinge wee reade of a castinge out o [...] diuells by fastinge a [...]d prayer, euen then when Christ himselfe was vpon earth: (for Christ saith not, this kinde shall not goe forth as speaking of the time future,math. 17. [...]1. Marke, 9. 24 or that which afterwardes should be, but this kinde goeth not out, as meaning of the time present, & that which then was done or in vse:) and that after this manner the Apostles did not dispossesse the diuells as is made euident (I trust) where I treat of this scripture: it must needes be that this kinde of e [...]ection of vncleane spirits. viz by prayer or prayer and fasting, was in the church in the Apostles time. And this is confirmed by these wordes of our Sauiour: [...] I through Beelzebub cast out diuels, by whome doe your children cast them outs? therefore they shall be your iudges. By whome (saith Christ;math. 12. 17. Luke 11, 1 [...]. doe your children cast them out? as if he had said, though Beelzebub or by the spirit of god? by which interrogation is insinuated, doe they it not by the spirit of god? for you say not of them neither will saye, that that they doe, is done by the diuell: therefore that is, because you say that your children cast out diuels by the spirit of god wherein indeede you say truly: and in the meane season affirme that I cast them out by Beelzebub: and so of the like actions, done by the same finger, giue a contrary iudgment, which is a most vnrighteous thing, they shalbe your iudges: that is in the day of iudgment shall testify against you: according to which testimony, god shall iudge you. It is now to be considered, by whome and by what manner this was done, whether by the Apostles, or some other which had frō Christ receaued the same power with them ouer vncleane spirits, and so by commaunding Sathan to depart in his name, or by some other kynd of men, and after an other manner: First then we are to knowe that by those which are heere called your children, meaning Iewes which in Christ's time cast out diuels, cannot be vnderstood coniurers, because they cannot well be said to cast out diuells as is heere saide of these: for how can Sathan driue out Sathan? but specially, for that Christ approueth of this e [...]ection,marke. 3. 2 [...]. and secretly confesseth it to be done by the spirit of god, Neither hereby may we (although many doe) vnderstand the Apostles or Disciples, nor yet any who expelled euill spirits by commaunding them in the name of Iesus Christ: bycaus [Page 44] these their children the Pharises confessed to cast diuells forth by the power of god, but this as they denyed to Christ, so it cannot be but that they would deny the same also to all of his houshould,math. 10. 24, & to whō soeuer that should playnely and directly in his name, and by any power receaued from him cast forth Sathan: for the disciple is not aboue his maister, nor the seruant aboue his Lord. It is enough for the disciple to be as his maister is, and the seruant as the lord. If they called the maister of the house Beelzebub, how much more them of his housholde? And as the pharises because of theire extreame mallice against Christ, which must needes extend it selfe to his disciples, could not but be farr from the approuing and commending of any greate worke done in the name of Christ,Iohn 11, 48. & 12, 10. so also for that they could not indure that the people shold beleeue in him, but when any myracle was done that might cause or helpe forward that same, they were readye to burst for anger. That this generation of vypers then, who excommunicated the blind man for bearing witnesse to the work that Christ had wrought vpon him, and ordeyned that if any man did confesse that he was Christ, Iohn 22. 34. he shoulde be excomunicate out of the Synagogue: who consulted togither to put Lazarus to death, because for his sake many of the Iewes went away, and beleued in Iesus: would acknowledge that worke to be done by a deuyne power,Iohn. 12. 10, (and so allowe and commend it) which was done in the nā [...] and power of Iesus Christ, and was very effectuall to bring the Iewes to beleue in Christ, as they did heere of this eiection of diuells performed by their children, as a thing euen impossible. For these two reasons it cannot be,Luk 1 [...] [...] that they who are saide he [...]re to cast out dyuelles, were either of the Apostles or 70. disciples of Christ, or any other that by power communicated from Christ did in the extraordinarye manner cast forth wicked spirits. If therefore euill spirits were cast out of some in the Apostles time, and not by the Apostles nor by any others after that extraordinary manner the Apostles did, viz. by commaunding of Sathan to depart in the name of Christ Iesus, as by the Scripture is manifest: must it not needes be, that then there was an other manner of eiection besides that extraordinary vsed by the Apostles and disciples of Christ? and why may we not say, that it was by prayer,ma [...] [...] 9. 29. or prayer and fasting, considering those wordes of our Sa [...]ur, This kinde can by mother [...]eanes c [...]me forth, but by prayer and [...] ▪ The former of these Caluine writinge vpon this very place, doth not only a [...]firme, but also confirme and proue out of the scriptures, and [...]o the latter he doth very much inclyne, although he doe [...] the same.Cal [...]ni ha [...]
[...] [...]piunt &c. their childrē, soe take for the children of that whole [...] that the Apostles were so called. Others [Page 45] referr them to the olde Prophets. But I doubt not but that he vnderstandeth the Exorcists of whome then there were many among the Iewes, as appeareth by the 19. chapter of the Acts, for it is likely that they did iudge no better of the disciples of Christ, then of the maister. And presently after speaking of the originall of these Ex [...]rcists he saith this: Ita fier [...] potest vt inuocato Dei nomine, doemones fugarent &c so it may be, that by calling vpon the name of god (that is by prayer) they did cast out diuells and the people hauing had experience of such power of god, did rashly ordeyn vnto themselues an ordinary funct [...]ion.
But the Disc. laboreth to confute, first by producing M. More his contrary iudgmente. I answere, that M. More and my selfe are fellowe minnisters, and that the same is no more a conuiction of my opinion then mine of his. And what although we dissent not only here in, but in some other points also concerning the doctrine controuerted, which the Disc. I warrant you seteth out and pursueth to the vttermost are we not men and subiect vnto error as well as others? And is it such a rare matter to see two differ aboute the interpretation of the same place of scripture? and of such vse, as the same (forsooth) must needs be published to the worlde? surely nothinge lesse. But this vse wee may make of it, that the same con [...]idered, it is not likely there was any such deuise or confederacie as the Disc. affirmeth in the 15. page of his Discouerie. His wordes be thes. Of these premises it woulde peraduenture anger them, if any should collect, that in all likelihoode▪ seeinge neither by learninge nor sufficient argumentes, they coulde heretofore preuaile, for the settinge vp of their pres [...]iteriall conceits, they thought to supply [...] there wants therein, by this diuise of castinge out diuels. In pressinge the difference in opinions betwixt vs, the Disc. ouerthroweth the likliehood he here speaketh of, more then he was aware. Secondly, he goeth about to conuince me. by two arguments of his owne: the first where of is sett downe in these wordes. To hould with M. Darrell, that there was an ordinarie meane to cast out diuels in Christs time, pag. 44. doth derroga [...] much from the honor of his miracles in casting out satan. I answere, no [...]no more, then to hould that there was then an ordinarie meanes to heale other diseases and infirmities of mans body, doth derrogat from the honor of his miracles. in healinge persons so diseased or affected, but here of he giueth a reason: for the infidels might haue surmised, that Christ had done it by the ordinarie meanes, hauinge vsed the sam [...] secretly with-out there knowledge, The vnbeleuing Iewes coulde no more surmise thus, then in his curinge of naturall diseases, that he did the same by naturall meanes, or medicines secretly applied vnto them before. And neither of these coulde they in any reason so much as surmise, consideringe the insinit number he healed, and that immediatly, so so [...]ne as he [...] [Page 46] them, yea often times before. vpon the touching of the hem of his gr [...] ment. His seconde argument followeth. moreouer, it maye argue the extraordinarie meanes to be superfluous: there beinge then an ordinarie, pag. 44. meanes, and that of such facillitie, as will after appeare. no. for the expulsion of satan by the extraordinarie meanes. ct. by a worde, so as Christ no sooner spake. or the Apostles in his name, but the euil spirit went out: did most manefestly and palpablie (as I may saye) sett forth, or publish and preache to al men, the dietie of Christ Iesus: which the ordinarie by callinge vpon the name of God, did not. 2. The extraordinary and miraculus election by a worde, yea some times by the very shadowe of one, so guifted, or kercheiefs or handkerchiefs carried from such, argued a far greater power and authoritie ouer vncleane spirits and so did more commende and dignifie such persons and there ministrie, then the eiection by the ordinarie meanes. The extraordinary therefore, was not superfluous but of singuler vse, notwithstandinge there was then an ordinarie meanes. Neither is the ordinarie, of such facillitie as the Disc. imagineth. Is it so easie a thinge to pray, or to be so affected with the miserie of an other, as to sende vp sighes or grones to the Lord in their behalfe? Indede to babble or to vse the labor of our lippes for our selues or others is an easie matter, commō to the prophanest that liue: but to labour inwardly in our spirits, or to offer vp a spirituall seruice acceptable to God in Christ,psal. 25. 1. or as the Prophet Dauid saith, to lift vp our harts to god, with sighes and groanes for our selues or others, they beinge fast glued to the earth, and naturally giuen to looke thyther, is a verie vneasie hard and difficult thinge▪ and far more vneasie to continue and holde out any time therein: & hard liest of all can wee be contented, and that for the good of an-other, to waine our selues for a daye from meate and drinke, and all other comfortes of this life: Our profits and pleasures, afflictinge & humblinge our soules together ther with. That this is not a matter of such facillitie as the Disc. affirmeth, lamentable and dayly experience doth shewe. But if we will speake of a facillitie, in castinge out deuils, then must we goe to Christ & his Apostles, who no sooner spake the word but it was donne, yea somtimes with more facillitie then a worde, as is layed downe before.
M. Darrell confessing the necessity of sayth in the said ordinary meanes, [...] saith: that neither the faith of doing myracles. nor the iustifying faith is therein necessary: but that the temporary, or historicall faith may suffice. It being h [...]re obiected, that an historicall faith sufficing, (as is before expressed) and that the prayer and fasting in such as haue but that faith cannot please god: it will followe that the ordinary meanes which Christ hath left in his church f [...]r casting out of diuels as necessary, is such a meanes as [...] not [Page 47] accept able to almighty god: M. Darrell answereth, that the consequent is not good, and so that poynt lyeth.
And so he answereth againe, and againe will, if the Disc. sholde ympleade him a thousand times. Surely one wolde thinke this argument followeth not. The prayer and fasting of such as haue only the temporall or historicall faith, cannot please god in Christ, to the obteyninge of any spirituall blessing: therefore not to the casting ont of sathan, or obteininge of thir corporall benefit: and so by consequence, wee haue a meanes to cast out diu [...]els, if this be one, which is not acceptable or pleasing vnto god. Yf the Disc. reply that he doth not so vnderstand the Antecedet, or first part of this argument, as I set it downe, then I ment not to deny the argument, neither doe I now, but the Antecedent, which must be this The prayer and fasting of such &c. cannot please god to the obteyninge of any blessing, (that is so farr preuaile with god) otherwise he concludeth nothing. Now this is false. For the prayers and humiliation of the wicked, may auayle with god to the obteyning of a corporall benefit, and remouing of a temporall iudgment from himselfe or an other, and such is possession,1 kinges 11 [...]1 27. 29. and deliuerance therefrom: albeit the sa [...] is not effectuall to procure a spiritual blessing, as the remission of sins and such like. Ahab fasting and humblinge himselfe, though it were but outwardly and not in soundnesse and syncerity of hart, did thereby escape not only himselfe, but his sonn also that punishment which otherwise had certainly ouertaken them both.exodus 22. 21. vers 23. vers 2 [...]. 27. Thou shalt not (saith the lord by Moses) doe iniury to a stranger, neither oppresse him: yee shall not trouble any widdowe, nor fatherlesse childe: if thow vex or trouble such, & so he call and cry vnto me, I will surely heere his cry. And a little after if thow take thy neighbours rayment to pledge, thow shalt restore it vnto him before the sonne goe downe: for that is his couering only, and this is his garment for his skyn: wherein shall he sleepe? therefore when he [...]yeth vnto me I will heare him: for I am mercifull. Shall we thinke now that god heareth not the prayers or cryes that the stranger, widdowe, fatherlesse, &c. send forth to the lord out of the anguish of their soules, and greuousnes of their oppression, except they be such as be indewed with a iustifying faith? god forbid. For howsoeuer it is certaine that in the [...] and in such like cases the eares of the lord are open to such, & theire prayers most auailable with god: yet are they not shut against sinners but god heareth them thus far, as to deliuer them from the oppression they are in, and to take vengeance▪ of their oppressors. And it is to be obserued that we haue no such limitation here. Is it not thus saide by the lorde? If the stranger, widdowe, fatherlesse childe that feareth my name, call an [...] cry unto me, I will heare: but more generallye, yf any widdowe or fatherlesse childe whatsoeuer, being iniuried, or oppressed, [Page 48] call and cry vnto mee I will surely heare. Thus then it is. God doth heare the sighings and cryes &c. that wicked men in their miseryes, or unminent daunger thereof doe send forth vnto him, and deliuereth them, [...] 45. 9. as the creator ready to shew mercy to his creature, which although as a sinner he abnorreth,D [...] [...]2. 6. 13. [...]4 luke [...]. with his prayers and all his sacrifices, yet as his creature he loueth, and hath compassion of, specially in misery, as appeareth by the places of scripture aboue written: where this is set downe for areason,M [...]th. 4, 45. [...] 6 [...] [...]4. 17. why he will surely heare the oppressed stranger, widdowe, fatherlesse &c. for I am mercifull: also by that saying or Dauid: The lord is god to all. And herein we shall be further confirmed, if we call to minde, how the lorde in respect of our creation calleth himself our * sather, and vs in the [...]ame respect his sonnes and daughters: Math 1. 21, [...] 113 [...]21. [...] 12. 13. [...] [...] 1 1, Lo [...] 3, 15, 16. & 1 [...]. 10, L [...] 1 [...]. 11. 12. Io 14. 17. 9. well therefore may go theare his children by creation, in a matter pertayninge to this [...]re, seeing also in the thinges of this life he is so aboundantly gratious vnto them: But concerninge the life that is to come, or spirituall blessings in heauenly things, it is no marua [...]e though he heare them not at ad, but only his sonnes by adoption, considering he will bestowe no such * treasures vpon them, [...] that Iesus Christ maketh no [...] intercession for them: [...] pet: 2. 5. in whome only and for whose mediation, such requests are accepted of god.
But an other point may not be left asleepe.Ca [...]. 45. Darrell saith [...]hat in the said place of Math. 17. 20. that the faith there mentioned, is to be vnderstoode to be the saith of dung miracles: That the Apostles were reproued for theire? weaknes in that saith: And that if the same had bene stronge enough, they might haue cast ut the wicked spirit mentioned in that Chapter, verse 21. without prayer of fasting: whereby it followeth (for ought that dull men cā discerne) that M. Darrell houlding (as is before mentioned) that place of scripture to be a secret ordinance for the [...]ontinuance of fasting and prayer, as the meanes to cast out diuells, and that therein by faith is vnderstood the faith o [...] doing miracles: (which if it had bene strong enough in the Apostles prayer and fasting had bene superfluous) it will followe it is thought, that the historicall faith will not serue his twne, but that it must be the faith of thing miracles: which must be vnderstood for the saith that is required of nec [...]ssary when there is neede to cast out diuells. So as if he want that, he may ( [...] his owne doctr [...]in [...]) cast his cappat them.
Marke ( [...]tood Reader) his noate of attention, or preface before my a [...]lertion but an other poynt may not be lest asl [...]epe: and after his cole [...]tion there-vpon, the caling of a capp, ymagine his owne into the n [...]re, and you shall see the man marueylously tryu [...]phing so tha [...] eithe [...] now sure he hath the vi [...]tory, & that he hath got also out of my owne wordes, or els he will neuer haue it. The poynt I a [...]firmed was, that the faith minityned Math. 17. 20. [...]to be vnderstood of the mira [...] lous [Page 49] faith and heereof I gaue two reasons, which are heere likewise set downe. There-vpon saith the Disc. it followeth, that Dar. holdinge that place of scripture to be a secret ordinance for the continuance of fasting and prayer as the meanes &c. I answer, that all that he inferreth was true, and very fitly collected, if I hold the place the speaketh of viz. Math. 17. 20. to contayne in it the ordinance wee speake of: But all men knowe that it is not Math. 17. verse 20. which were most absurd: but verse 21. viz. these wordes: This kinde goeth not out, but by prayer and fasting. Yea the Disc. himself confesseth the same, but the leafe before this, page 43. Thus in a word we see his collection and boastinge to be meerely in vayne. Yet for our better vnderstanding and further answer, we must remember: that two kindes of expulsion of sathan are heere spoken of one extraordinary, wherein the miraculous faith is required, verse 20. and an other by an ordinary meanes, viz. praier or prayer and fasting, verse 21. and here howsoeuer the iustifyinge faith is to be wished, and is best: yet the faith temporall, or historical may suffice, for the expelling of sathan after this manner, or by the ordinary meanes, which standeth not somuch in the saith of the person therein vsed, as in the mercye of god obteyned, man vsinge the meanes which to that end he hath ordeyned. And as this faith may suffice, so it should seeme that it hath or shall: for we reade that in the day of the lorde, some workers of iniquity shall say for themselus lord haue we not in thy name cast out diuels? math. 7. 22. why should we vnderstand this of Iudas only and such as he, who by a word cast out diuells, seing that manner of eiection continued so small a time in the church: And not as well of the sonnes of Sceua? (and such as they) who it is probable cast out diuells by the ordinary meanes, where-with they had mixed some adiurations, (where-vpon they were called Exorcistes) added thereto in that and former time when all things almoste were corrupted, and as it is very likely vpon some imitation of the prophets, who had (no doubt) cast out diuels by adiuring or commaunding the spirits to goe out in the name of the lorde: as the papists doe nowe in the ymitation of Christ and his Apostles: both of them forgetting that they had not receaued any such power ouer vncleane spirits, and therefore should haue refrayned from commuanding or adiuring them. True it is that they were far from casting the euill spirit out of the man mentioned Acts 19. the reason I thinke was because they entred upon that where-vnto they were not at all called of god: for not contented with that manner of eiection they had formerlye vsed, because it shewed no such authority ouer diuells, as that perf [...]rmed by the Apostles, and by consequent did commend them nothīg somuch to the people, which was the only thing they desired: they at [Page 50] tempted to cast euill spirits out of sundry in the name of the lord Iesus: n [...] maruaile therefore though they had no better successe therein, albeit they percase after an other manner, I meane the ordinarye meanes both before & after that dispossessed diuers. And why doth this [...]eme so strange and incredible to some, as I known it doth? why may not a wicked man be as well an instrument to cast out diuells after the ordinary, as the extraordinary manner? and out of the body, as well as the soule of man? seig especially this latter is a far more worthy work, If we obiect as (I thinke) we can obiect nothing else, that god heareth not the prayers of such, nor regardeth their humiliations: that is answered already.
They powerfull preaching is annexed for a meanes to prayer and fasting. Wherevnto may be added the word of God (as the story saith) which the d [...]lls (forsooth) could not indure to heare,pag. 50, but would be gone. And so you see them fall into the said popish follies, makinge the signes of possession, the meanes and causes of dispossession.
VVee doe not, neither euer did affirme, that these are the meanes ordeyned of god for the castinge of sathan out of the bodyes of men, for we doubt not but that without the vsinge of either of these he may be expelled, as it was in the dispossession of Kath. Wright and Darling. Yet notwithstanding we thinke that in this said worke theris good and holy vse thereof. First, because in this case, men wrestle not against [...]l [...]sh and bl [...]ud, but against principallityes and powers, and against the worldly gouernours,, the princes of the darknes of this world, against spirituall wickednesse [...] which are in the high places: [...]ph. 6. 10. It standeth them therefore vpon, to take vnto them the whole armour of god that they may be able to resist so strong an enemy, and hauing finished all things stād fast. Now part, yea a principall part of this armour, is the word of god, euen the sword of the spirit: math. 4. And herein we haue our blessed Sauioure for an example to imitate, who when the deuill in an extraordinarye and visible manner appeared vnto him, speaking also vnto him, he resisted and ouercame him by the word of god. Secondly, because the reading, [...]. p [...]. 5. 9. interpreting, & applying of the holy scriptures serue to strē gthen our faith, whereof there is neede: for resist (saith S. Peter) the diuell stedfast in the saith. 3. to stirr vp whatsoeuer guift of prayer is in vs, or feruency therein, and to worke the true humbling of vs vnder the mighty hand of god. But admit we hould readin [...] & expoundig of the word of god were meanes of dispossession, yet that followeth not there vpon which the Disc. from thence collecteth viz. that wee make the signes of possession, the meanes & causes of dispossession. Did weeuer hould the reading and preaching of the word, to be signes of posession? surely not for these signes are nothing else but the fea [...]efull [Page 51] effects and operations which sathan beinge within the body of man sendeth forth: in which nomber to place the worde of god and preaching thereof, is a most sottish and impious thinge: and simple men though we be, yet I trust wee were neuer so absurd: which beinge so, the Disc. collection is not worth a strawe.
But saith he, it is most apparant by M. Mores conceite, who thinketh prayer more necessary,pag. 50. then the signes of possession mentioned in the scriptures, for the true discerning of those who are possessed.
It appeareth that M. More doth not say altogither so, as is here mentioned. But be it graunted: doth he ther [...]ore make prayer a signe of possession? [...]8 so one & the same thing, a signe of p [...]ss [...]ssion, & meanes or cause of disposs [...]ssion? Behould how the Disc. argueth. By prayer a man may discerne of those that are possessed: ergo, prayer is a signe of possession. If this be a good argument then are these also: By the guifte called the discerning of spirits, the Apostles trulye discerned of those that were possessed, as the Disc. affirmeth pag. 28. [...]rgo, that guift is a signe of possession. By the knowledge of the signes of sathan possessing one, mentioned in the gospell, wee may trulye discerne of those that are possessed: ergo, that knowledge is a signe of possession. And so the Apostles were possessed, & all indued with this said knowledg for where the proper signe of a thing is, there is also for certainty the thing signifyed thereby. Againe, by good skill in phisick, one may trulye discerne of a feuer: therefore skill in phisick is a signe of a feuer.
Thus to reason doth very ill beeseme a batcheller of artes, much more a batcheller and Doctor of diuinity. But this much worse: professed deuines to charge falsly (and that in print) a preacher of the gospell, to hould, that prayer is a signe of possession, where-vpon followeth, that al which pray are possessed.
OF CHAP. 9.
Of the signes whereby M. Darrell & others doe discerne (as they say) when sathan is expelled.
M. Darrells ignorance maketh him (as it seemeth) in this point confident. He is peremptory,pag. 50. that because it is saide in the scriptures: that the spirits of the lunatike, when he was cast out of him did cry and rent him sore, & that b [...] lay as one dead: that therefore these three are infallable signes appointed of God to knowe when one is dispossessed, Nay rather then fayle hee will be content with one of them, as in his dealing with Thomas Darlinge heereafter will appeare.
VVhere-vpon I houlde these three for signes whereby to knowe when one is dispossessed, as signifying the egresse of the spirite. I haue before declared▪ it remayneth therefore only that I answer to those obiections the Disc. maketh against them. The first wherof is this: [Page 52] Some lewde knaue may easily counterfeyt these signes: ergo &c. I answer, that none can counterfeyt, that is, doe the like to any one of them, much lesse can any counterfeyt them all. For the holy ghost speaketh not of a naturall cry, sent forth by mans voyce or power, the like wherevnto an other man may vtter and so counterfeyt: But of a supernaturall loud cry, sent forth by a supernaturall power, I meane, the diuells: for it is said, [...]ke 1. 26. the vncleane spirite cryed with a loud voyce and came out of him: in like sorte it is said, the vncleane spirit tare him: nowe one would thinke that both the hand and tongue of man were too short to performe that is done by the diuell. It is besides said of the possessed childe mentioned Mark. 9.vers 26 that when the spirit was gone out of him, he was as one dead, in somuch that many said he is dead. meaninge that howsoeuer he was not indeede deade, but had life remayning in him, yet he was in all things like to a deade body, without any appearance of life, starke and stiff, the pulses not beating, nor taking breath &c. like to a man in a swound. in whome although there be life, yet no such thing appeareth to be. Euen so it was with the dispossessed child, where-vpon the people which thronged about him tooke him to be deade. Nowe this lewd knaue cannot easily nor yet possibly counterfeyt Howsoeuer then, were our 10. dispossessed persons counterfeites, as the Disc. will haue them, there crying, renting, and fayning to lye as dead, an other as lewde might easily counterfeyt: yet to say that one may counterfeyt the crying, renting sore, and lying as deade, mentiōed in the gospell, and caused by the diuell, is both absurd & impious. His second obiection is set downe in these wordes. M. Darrell confessing, that in the Apostles times, some spirits were cast out more easily then others, might in reason haue thought, that those that went out so easily, did not so greuously torment the parties at their casting out, as the rest did.
True, not so greuously torment at theire going out, as the rest did, therefore not greuously torment at all, [...]g. [...]1 and so of the other signes. This followeth not, as euery childe may se. Two malefactors are whipped (ymagine) for one and the same falt, by two seuerall tormentors: the one being beaten by the more cruell man, hath 40. stripes: the other by him that is lesse cruell hath but 20. By this reason now of the Dis. this latter was not beaten at all, for he was not beaten so greuously as the other was.
His third obiection followeth: And somewhat it is that although there are diuers mentioned in the scriptures, [...]g. 51. to haue bene dispossessed by our Sauiour Christ and by his Apostles: yet it is said of none but of the lunatick Mark. 9. that when Sathan departed, the spirit either cryed, or rente him sore, or that they lay as dead. To make therefore such particularities in one, a generall rule to all, argueth greatly the weaknes of his iudgment.
[Page 53] The Disc. is greatly deceaued, for of an other Mark. 1. (a man and not a childe, as the lunatike was Mark. 9.) it is said, that when he was dispossessed, the vncleane spirit tare him, and that he tare or rent him sore appeareth by Luke 4. where the same story is set down.mark [...] 1, [...]. vo [...] [...]. Secondly it is written, that he cryed with a laude voyce, and came out of him. And in the 8. of the Acts, that the vncleane spirits crying with al [...]de voyc [...], came out of many that were possessed. And in that this is not saide heere of a particuler person, as Mark 1. & 9. but of many, it is therby playne, that it was an vsuall thing with the spirits, to send forth or cause loude cryes, when they went out of those they possessed. Thus hath the Disc. in saying that none but the lunatick Mark 9. either cryed, or was rent sore, vttered vn-awares a manif [...]st vntruth, and therein shewed no greate learning or iudgment, who vpbraydeth others with ignoran [...]e, weaknes, and want of iudgment. VVe reade not indeeue in euery place where mention is made of casting out diulls, of these 3. effe [...]ts, that they cryed, were rent sore, and lay as deade, but only in the 9. of Mark: nor in any place besides, that they in that case were for a season as dead, and had the Disc. said either of these, he had said trulye: yet notwithstanding it is very probable that thus it went with the dispossessed generally: for in the 17. of Math. and 9. of Luke where the dispossession of the lunatick childe is set downe, there is no mention neither of crying * nor renting, vers. 1 [...]. vers 42. nor lying as dead, yet by the 9. of Mark it is cleare that when the diuel went out of him he cryed, was rente sore, and lay as deade. In luke. t [...]ere is mention of [...] of tearing. but that is to be vnderstoode of the time of his po [...]session and not after that lesu [...] [...] the deuill, and comm [...]ded him to goe [...]orth & so of the acte [...]. In the 4. of Luke we reade of the dispossession of one of Capernaum, whome Christ met in the synagogue, but we heare no thing of any loude cry: that then was sent forth, yet by the 1. of Mark verse 26. where the same myracle is recorded it is playne there was such a cry: for it is said, the vncleane spirit cryed with a l [...]ud voyce. In that there is then no more mention in the gospell of these I call signes of dispossession, it is not because they which were dispossessed, did not cry, neither were sore rent, nor lay for a season as deade, at the going out of the spirit, but only the luna [...]dke Marke 9. whereof fewe will doubt, the e [...]place compared and considered with that of the Act: But for that the holy Fuangelists labouring after breuity doe (vsuall:) [...] only the said greate workes with some sewe circumstances, as out of whome the diuell was cast,vers. 15. where and specially by whome & in what manner it was done vi [...] by the word or commaundement of Christ: without describing at large the manner of sathans vexing the sayde party, either while he held his possession, or when he went forth, the 9: of Marke only excepted, where both these are performed [...] & therfore it is that els-where we reade not of all the 3. signes, and not because other dispossessed persons did not cry &c. when the sprit went [Page 54] out, but only he. And where the Disc: saith that rather then fayle I will be content with anyone of them: I answer that howsoeuer I thinke these 3: signes were vsually heard and seene in the egresse of the spirits, yet it may be not alwayes, but sometimes two or percase one did suffice to signify the same, and yet are not the other therefore in vaīe because the more signes the more we are confirmed in the dispossession of one: for why may not this as well be true of the signes of dispossession as of possession? where all the signes are not required. but some of many may suffice, as hath bene shewed before yea what & if we should see one bowed togither, so as he could not lift vp himself, as the vers 11. for it is very likelye shee was posest. possessed woman was Luke 13. might we not well thence gather (especially if we perceiued that it was not naturall) that he had a spirit causing the infirmity of body, and that he was so bound by sathan? And yet this is but one effect or operation of sathan: & so but one signe of possession. And why one signe may not suffice to signify the spirits going out of a man, as well as this being in the body of mā I for my part doe not see neither doe I think that the Disc. can shew any reason. And although be it one, or more, there is singuler vse of the signe or signes, to signifye the egressse, as I haue shewed before, treating thereof: Yet are the signes of dispossession of no such absolut necessity, as the signes of possession are, as might easilye be shewed. And therefore I will not deny but that one may be dispossessed, and none of these signes appeare, which is more: the health and ease of the party from all former vexation by the diuell, declaring his deliue rance from the diuell, as it is in naturall diseases: yet I think it falleth out thus very seldome if euer, for the reasons formerly giuen by me. Vnderstand me of the eiection of sathan by the finger of God,de Doemon. cap. 52. sect. 20. & not of his voluntary egresse as is in the papacy, which may well alter the case. And so is Thyreus fully answered saying, non raro fit vt spiritus de scendant, nullis sui discessus post se datis signis. It is often seene that sathan departeth, leauing no signes of his going: which the Disc. in the ende of this Chapter obiecteth out of him against me.
From these signes he proceedeth to certayne other, which my selfe haue obserued in experience, whereof we haue heard before, & saith that it may not be omitted of whome I haue learned them, euen of Thyreus forsooth. But how can this possibly be true? seing Thyreus tretise de doem [...]niacis, from which by my handes these counterfeyts shold haue receaued their directions concerninge the signes, came not to England vntill the yeare 1598. they suffring or doinge the same, the one of them I meane Darling 1595. and the other viz. the 7. in Lancashire 1596.? How greatly also in this respect did the Disc. f [...]rget [...] himselfe to make (almost) a whole I meane the first bodke of the Disco [...]tris booke to this end, to perswade [Page 55] the world, that I haue learned all my skile (forsooth) concerning possession, of Thyreus the lesuite, and in the same booke euery where alleadge him to consute me: whe [...]eby appeareth that Thyreus and I dissent in iudgment as much almost as two can dissent about the doctrie in question: & therefore it is very vnlikely that I haue learned I know not what from him. He procedeth to obiect against the signes heard and sene at the dispossession of the parties controuerted as followeth.
The cheif assurance,pag. 53. that M. Dar. and M. More had, that sathan had left lane Ashton, was her owne wordes, viz. when rising from her sit, she said he is gone, he is gone, I am well, I thank god. And hauing wept in the said fitt, shee also saide, that then Sathan departed from her. So as heere we haue a newe signe of Sathans going out of one: viz. the wepinge of the party.
That M. More hath said no such thing, as the truth is, so it is probable heerby, for that the Disc. in the margent hath not noted the article and page, as his vsuall manner is in other places, which if he could haue done, he woulde neuer haue omitted. And truly for my owne part (god is my witnesse) I neuer said so, yea it was farr from me, much lesse did I depose so, as the Disc. affirmeth, yea what need it, seeing besides her most extreame tormentes at that time, I (with many more) sawe her lye as dead for a season: which had I forgotten as it is not likely, yet thereof the story of the 7. in Lancashire written by M. Dickons (one of the coppies whereof I had) would haue put me in minde: [...]. heereof also I was neuer deposed nor examyned, no nor yet concerning the 7. in Lancashire, saue the first time I was befor the Bishope a worde ar two, concerning them all in generaall, as whether I had not seene them before M. Starchy writ vnto me, and whether M. More had not bene there before he went with me. VVherby appeareth the corrupt dealing of the Discouerer, who in the margent hath Darrell ad art. 17 pag. 144. And whereas in the Lancashire story penned by M. Dickons, from whence (and not from M. More nor me) the Disc. hath both this and a great deale more in this said chapter, and elswhere scattered heere and there, there is mention of her increase of torment (which as I conceaue is ment by those words Mar. 9. rent sore) where-vpon these wordes are vsed: Now in this time they were all greeued to see how pittifully she was tormented. & togither with that he heere mentioneth this, viz. she was cast into a traunce, and lay as one deade for a while: he hath of purpose omitted both these: that soe he might weaken that it is saide by me concerninge the signes of dispossession, and withall bring the reader ignorant herefo, to suspect h [...]r dispossession, and togither with hers all the rest. To which purpose he proceedeth to the dispossession of Margares Byrom, and the [Page 56] siges thereof: wherein he dealeth more playnlie and lesse corruptly, I meane especially in that he telleth in the argument from whence [...] had the same: not from M. Mores deposiuons & mine, but from the history of the 7. in Lancashire.
Margaret Byrom saide that at her reuerting [...], after shee had lyen as dead half [...] her belly towards her brest, [...] thence to her throat &c. as followeth the history before. It le [...]t behinde it said [...]heea [...] throat, and a filthy [...], that a weeke after her meate was vnsau [...]ry. Heere wee haue the Iesuite, stinche. And besides the must infallable mate among [...]e I. [...] diposs [...]ssi [...], viz. [...]ying for dead is heere confuted, for this party was [...] was gone.
This obiection ariseth onlye of the misplacinge of one worde which the writer of this story M. Dick [...]n [...] which being placed in his right place the obiection is ea [...]y an [...]: for wheras it is thus set downe.This word [...] [...]etto. M. [...] (a) that at her [...] after shee had lyen as dead [...] &c. it shoulde haue bene thus Margaret Byronsay [...] had lye as dead [...] an houre, that she felt the spirit come vp &c. neither can the firste in any sence or reason be Byron, as they must needes it we take the wordes as they are [...] reported: for she knew not how long [...]he lay dead, no more then a deade body: But very [...] they belong to the writer of [...], as appeareth by the right placing of the word that. From Margaret Byro [...] he proceedeth to the [...] and out of the Lancashi [...] story, setteth downe at large the seuerall thapes that the euill spirits (as it shoulde seeme) caused presently vpon their egresse from them, and presented themselues into theire eyes. as if they had gone for [...] of them indued with such bodyes and there-vpon pla [...]eth vppon Darlynges m [...]wse. And all this to make their dispossession odiou [...], or ridiculous if he could, whereas indeede it conf [...]ometh the same. But he saith neuer a word of their most extrame torments, for renting sore, their cryinge [...] their lying all [...] they had bene starke dea [...]e, which in the [...] downe with their seuerall circumstaunces: The [...]e thinges he thougt good to omitt:
[...] all the signes of dispossession, and therein the dispossession of o [...]r Demnia [...]k [...], [...] confirmed by the signes thereof, hee [...] they may shewe them, and yet not [...]. [...] cap. [...] sect. 4. I answer [...] and graunte that [...] as the putting out of a c [...] [Page 57] die, the breaking of a quarry in the glasse-windowe, and such like ridiculous signes, it is most true▪ the signes also which of their owne accord they giue, as the sensible and vi [...] (as I may say) going out in such [...] as we heare, vomiting &c. I doubt not but they may at theire lunt [...] pleasure omitt: but that they may shew them and keepe their possession. especially the signes mentioned in the gospell, as the [...]esuite will haue it, and that also after the meanes is vsed arig [...]t, which god [...]ath or [...]e, ne [...] for the casting out of diuells I deny. [...]or it cannot be that god will suffer the spirites thus to delude & mock his people, which shall be heereabouts occupied in faith and obedience to his owne ordinance: wherein as the wicked spirits would delight exceedingly, thus (I meane) to di [...]emble an egresse, in handling the persons possessed in such manner as some times they did when they wente out of men, and especially at the time we speake of, so woulde they vse the same full often: yea I trust if it were so, & left to then pleasure, and that the diuells were not in this case ouer ruled & brydled by that ouer & allrusig had of god, all England shold haue heard of it before this. Againe were it thus that the spirits might giue these signs & tarrie in men, or that the spirits might omitt all the signes metioed in the scripture whē they goe forth of men, we could not know that the possessed were dispossessed as hath bene shewed, but must needes stand in doubt therof at least for a time, & that time wherin we are affected with the works of god, it euer: whereby it would come to paste, that when this wonderfull worke of god sholde at any time be wrought, the lord should neither be hattely praysed, for the same, and receaue that glory that otherwise would be giuen him, nor man receaue sound profit therby. And it is a wonderfull thing to consider how ready the papists are to affirme that their Exorcis [...]s can & doe compell the spirits to giue such signes as they pleaseof their departure, and neuer once thinke of gods compellinge them to giue the signes mentioned in his word at their egresse, for the a [...]s;surance of his people, that they are gone out, who without the same cannot possible knowe [...] much nor of his restrayning them to shewe the said signes whē yet they remaine within them.
OF CHAP. 10.
Of M. Dar. and M. M [...]res conceit: that Sathan being cast out of one, doth presently after seeke to rep [...]ss [...]ss him.
M. Darrell like a kinde [...] with the disposs [...]sion of any:pag. 53 but for [...] Care therein, he may be thought to haued [...] [...]mmendation. For his perswasion to such [...] that they should vse all diligence and circump [...]lim, that sathan did not againe reenter in to [...]. Th [...] his perswation hath eur bene drawne from a position, which he [...] that Sathan beinge expelled out of man, doth seeke prsently [Page 58] after to reenter into him againe:pag: [...] and that it is commonly a very h [...]rd matter to withstand him, by reason of his subt [...]tly, allui [...]ng [...] by promise [...], and terrifying of them by threatnings. And a little [...] in the scriptures.
[...] (saith Christ)math 1 [...]43 is [...] from where I came and when he is come, he [...] Then he goeth, & taketh vnto then [...] and they enter in, and dwell there: and the end of that man is wisse then the begning. Euen so shall all it be with this generation. This place of scripture is indeede metapharicall as appeareth by the [...]e wordes, euen so it shall be with this wicked genera [...]: and is vsed by our Sauiour, to illustrate and plainly set forth the miserable (future) estate of the Iewes, if they continued in their sinns. The metaphore is this. As it is with a man which hath an vncleane spirit cast out of him, if notwithstandinge that great mercy of god receyued, he continue in, or returne to his former sinnes, whereby it cōe to passe that the diuell returning and seeking to enter into him again, doe indeede enter in, which he certainly will, if he finde his old guest such, and that with seauen other spirits worse then himselfe, the end of that man shall be worse then his begining, miserable therefore and fearefull▪ euen so shall it be with this people of the Iewes, who being in their bloud and filthynes,Exodus 1925. Deut. 32 9. Exodus. 19. 4. Zech, 2. 8. Romans 3, 2. Romans 9, 4, god washed and clensed and made them his peculiar people, and * cheif treasure aboue all people, so as they were the lord [...]s, portion and Iacob the lot of his inheritance, and hath * carryed them vpon eagles winges, being so tender ouer them, that * he that toucheth them, toucheth the apple of his eye, and * hath committed to them his oracles, so as * to them apperteyneth the adoption, and the glory, and the couenants, and the giuing of the lawe, and the seruice of god, and the promises: if this people now hauing bene made partaker of these and many other vnspeakable mercies of god, shall returne to their former filthinesse for their intollerable vnthankfulnes their last estate shall be very miserable, and worse then their first: which scripture as our fathers before vs so we at this day see fulfilled before our eyes, in that as it was said to Cain, they are cast out frō their owne land, which flowed with mylke and honney, and are vagabonds and runagates in the earth, & so their estate farr worse, euen seauen folde worse, then euer before. From this scripture I collect these things. First and cheifly, that the diuell beinge cast out of men, seeketh to enter agayne into them. 2. That he desireth the recouery of that pray he hath lost. (that is the possessing againe of the said party) aboue many other prayes. 3. that [Page 59] he doth recouer and repossesse such as giue themselues to the seruice of sint [...]e, and otherwise can not. 4. That in this case the vncleane spirit en reth not in alone, but with more and worse. 5. that the end or last estate of such i [...] all be worse then their fist. Nowe what though this seripture be vsed by the Lord as a metaphor or similitude to illustrate and th [...]r thing may we not therefore gather these things from hence? or is there no truth (trow we) in the metaphors themselues vsed by our Sauiour? Yf the salt (saith Christ) haue lost his sau [...]er, math 5. math. 13. 3 [...]. gal. 5. 9. pron [...]. [...], pron 728. it is good for nothing: men doe not light a candle and put it vnder a bushell, but on a cā al [...]stick, and it giueth light vnto all that are in the house. * The kingdome of heau [...]n is like vnto leauen, which a woman taketh and lydeth in three pecks of meale, till all be leauened. In like manner. S. Paule * A little [...]auen haueneth the whole lump. * Goe to the pismire O sluggard, (sayth Sal [...]mon) behould her wayes, she pr [...]pareth her meate in the summer, & gath reth her soode in the haruest. He that goeth vpon coales, his feete shall be burnt.
These are metaphors and yet in them and a thousand more in holy scripture, there is a certaine and vndoubted truth. That is sayde heere of going vpon coales, of the Pismire, leauen, and the rest with infinite more of the like kinde, is very true▪ notwithstanding the same is metaphorically spoken, yea let the Disc. shew but one metaphor in all the scriptures, wherein there is not a certaine and vndoubted truth: how can it then possibly be that this spoken of the vncleane spirit going out of a man, should be vntrue, because it is metaphorically? That this is spoken metaphorically, hindreth not at all the truth therof. And wheras the Disc. pretendeth as though I did only rely vpon the metaphoricall place, and had no other proofe, for that I so confidently affirme as touching the returne of the diuell, and seeking to enter againe into him out of whome he is gon, he is deceaued: for a moste pregnante proofe hereof there is (as hath bene already shewed) in the 9. of Mark where Christ Iesus being about to cast the diuell out of one, and knowinge the aforesaid metaphore to be most true, and that the vncleane spirit being gone out of man will returne, and seeke to enter into the same man againe, forbiddeth him so to doe, I meane, the reentring or repossessīg of the said party, it may be the rather because he was a child: I charge thee (saith he to the spirite) come out of him, vers 15. and enter no more into hī. Albeit then one testimony of the Lord Iesus might aboundantly suffice, yet behould a double testimony of his for the further confirmīg of vs in this truth: why then doth this seeme some strange or newe doctrine, or odd conceite, not onlye to the Disc. but to manye other that abhorre the counterfeyting he contendeth for, seeinge it hath such warrant, and is so playnlie set downe in the scriptures? me think [Page 60] [...] we tooked into the nature of the diuell and how hest [...]d [...] towardes god and man, this should not [...] that he [...] the possession thereof, yet will he not pre [...]ently giue ouer all [...] thereto, and seeke no [...] the [...] or any [...] he can compalle the possession againe, [...] doe he [...] it not, yet it is cleare he will [...] gen [...]rally true, so specially if it be a [...] the vsurper taketh great pleasure to [...] in, and he also one o [...] great [...] and hating dead [...] and much more wicked and [...] are [...] and powers) being as vsurpers cast out [...] mea, the gloribus temples for the holy [...] all possible meanes to enter into them [...] VVe all knowe and confesse, that sathā [...] of the soule of man, which he possesseth so long as we continue the [...] of disobedience, he doth more egerly besett it, and [...] of it, then euer he did before: and this beside, [...] the holy scripture teacheth vs, euery conuert knoweth to be true [...] owne experience. Nowe why should not the same spirit take the same course presently after his election out of that other part of man, his body [...] meane: seing not only the scriptures, but the parties [...] so [...] out of their owne experience signifye [...] there was iust cause I thinke to per [...] as I did, and is set downe before. And [...] there for the Disc. to condemne the reason (among others) of the [...] required of them viz. because [...] And yet [Page 61] behoulde how he boasteth as if the truth were firmly & vndoubtedly of his side, and as if he had answered all that men haue to say in two wordes,pag. [...]. viz. that the scripture wee relye vppon, is a metaphoricall place. But M. Darrell (saith he) and his frendes will peraduenture be better prouided in this poynt heereafter. How Dar. is prouided he nowe seeth: And by that time S. H. is prouided for obiections, I trust Dar. will be sufficiently prouided for answers vnto them. And thus much for answer to the obiections made against my opinions, which somtimes I deliuered to the B. of London, little thinking that the same shoulde haue bene published to the worlde. It remayneth that I proceede to the matter of fact charged against mee: in which two poynts the discouery consisteth.
OF CHAP. 11.
How those that tooke vpon them to cast out diuels doe get themselues work, and of their deuises to couer their lewdnes
The Exorcists of both kindes for wante of worke are driuen to theyre shiftes: and like tinkers walke vp and downe from place to place seeking to be imployed.pag. 60
Obserue heere not somuch the Disc. rayling, as his contrariety & thwarting of himselfe: for page 22. he himselfe saith and confesseth, that when Kath. Wright was first troubled, she was by one M. Beresfordes aduice sent to M Dar. at Mansfeild, and to one M Beckingham to be comforted, or cured of her infirmity. And concerning the occasion of my dealing with Th. Darling thus: The certainty hereof is, that M. Walkedeu (the boyes grandfather) hearing how M. Dar. had helped K. Wright, procured him to come to Burton, to helpe Darling: from him he peoceedeth to those in Lancashire: When the 7. in Lancashire were troubled M. Starky, and M. Dee resolued vpon him, and writ their seueral letters vnto him for his repayre into Lancashire:pag, 23. And lastly as touching the occasion of my going to Somers, he saith: that * I hauinge a sister in lawe at Nott: one Mistres Wallye, she writ vnto me, requesting me to come ouer to see the said Somers: Her evpon he addeth and colle [...]teth (and that trimlye) thus: Hetherto it may appeare, how M. Dar. hath beue sought vnto.
Yf this his collection with the premises be true, (otherwise he is greatly to blame to publish them to the world, and that for certayne truthes) how can this also be true, that like a tinker I walked vpp and downe &c. It is one thing to be sought vnto, and an other to seeke for worke, and to be ymployed. And thus is the Discou [...]rer conuynced by his Discouery: and let this suffice for answer and refutation of his tinkerlike stuffe.
It is a matter of some difficulty to discouer their shifts and sleightes to that purpose,pag 6 [...] they haue so many: and by their experience doe manage them [Page 62] so crastely. Diuers of them are heere set downe, and the rest may be supplyed peraduenture by some heereafter. Sometimes they make ch [...]yce of some such boyes or wenches, as they thinke are fitt for then purpose, whome they procure by many promises and allurements, to keepe their counsell, and to be (as they tearme it) aduised by them.
The Disc. and So. pag 79 & 81. pag 86. p [...]g. [...]2. & 84, heereafter tell vs, how for his counterfeiting [...] I * promised him he should neuer want whilest I liued. 2. * that so doing I doubted not to procure him a release from his maister: that besides I allured him by giuinge him first xij. pence, and after that an other xij. pence, but we heare nothing of the promises I made either Kath. Wright, or Th. Darling, or Mary Cooper: nor yet how these, or those in Lancashire were allured to counterfeyte. pag. 63. But I conceaue how it is. These were not sit schollers to dissemble and collude with me as Som. was and others of that kinde, but counterfe [...]ts of an other kinde, such as I did not confederate or couenant with, as I did with Somers: but as my comming to their fayned dispossession,pag. 63. sound ill at case, troubled eyther in their stoma [...]k with choller or fleame, or in their belly with grypinges or collick, or in their heade or ioynts with aches or numnesse▪ and vppon certaine speaches vsed by me a reformed Exorcist began to suspect them selues to be possessed, pag. 65. pag, 66. and others also with them: wherevpon they (pore soules) vnawares acted they knew not how the signes of possessyon and dispossession. Did euer one reade any thing more absurde then this? It may be we shall heereafter heare that which is as absurd of Somers: but otherwise we seldome or neuer reade the like sottish and ridiculous stuff, as the Disc. hath for 8. leaues togither, from page 61. vntill the ende of his first booke. But he procedeth in his childe-ish tale
And these are commonly of the poorer sort, either the children or seruāts, of such persons,pag. [...]1. as the Exorcists doe well know, to be of their owne stampe, and well aff [...]cted towards them.
Heere the Disc. greatly forgate himselfe [...] for albeit some of our Dem [...]macks were pore, yet was not Th. Darlīg of the porer sort, much lesse M. Starkies children, whose sonne is to inherite land worth (as I take it) some hundreds of pounds by the yeare. But he worse forgat himselfe in that which followeth: for how could we know the parents or maisters of such to be well affected towards vs, whome wee neuer knew or sawe in the face, before we dealt in the dispossession of the persons possesse [...] as they are ready to testify, and one in reason may well imagine of M. Starky and Mar. Byroms mother, seing we dwelt about to myles asunder. He addeth that we knowe them to be of oure owne stampe: what he meaneth hereby (because these wordes are somwhat obscure) we may perceaue by that heere following, set downe [Page 63] page 69. you shall obserue a little wonder: It will heardly be shewed, that any of this sorte haue bene found, but either in the houses of R [...]cusants, or of such as haue on the other side pretended some zeale, for they know not what reformation. Heerein also the Disc. was greatlye deceaued, for it is well known that the parents and maister of the persons possessed, were not Recusants, and for zeale after reformation they were so farr from that, as vndoubtedly they know not what that reformation he speaketh of meant, no not any of them, Darlings frendes excepted. Thus you heare of what stamp they were, whose children or seruants counterfeyted, as the Disc. tearmeth theire vexation by sathan: whereby it is manifest of what stamp we are, that dealt in the dispossessinge of these counterfeytes: which also in the same place he declareth more at large: Besides it falleth out amongst vs: that they who haue taken vppon them, pag. 69. to haue cast out diuells, haue still bene men of that humour, as being forsooth more pure then the rest of their brethren where by the way first we may learne▪ who is more pure then the rest of his brethren that is in playne termes a puritane: not he as all men imagine, who challengeth some purity to himselfe aboue other men, but he who is of the humour of reformation: more playnlie: he that hath some zeale for reformation. Yf the cause be thus, as it is cleare it is, there is no cause why these puritanes (as they call them) should be hated, despised, abhorred, and so shamefully intreated, as they were rather dogges, then men. It is a good thing (and deseruing loue and reuerence) to desire the reformation of that which is amisse in church, or person: a better & more pleasing to god, to seeke and labour after it, so it be done aright and in due order: and best of all and highly accepted before god to be earnest and zealous therein. But admit that these men seeke after the ref [...]rmation of those things which be not amisse, and neede not therefore to be reformed: in particuler, admit that it was lawfull for men to reepe carnall things, of those congregations where they sowe not spirituall thinges: to eate of the milke of the flock, though they feede not the flock: for these kind of * souldiers to haue wages, albeit they goe not a warfare, and that it were not the Lords ordinance that they only which preach the gospell, 1 tim. 2. 3, 1 cor, 6. 14, 16. should liue of the gospell: and that necessity lyeth not vpon euery minister to preach the gospell, but that the reading thereof sufficeth, and that men may liue of the gospel, although they be not able to preach the gospell, or if they be able, preach little or not at all, or not to the people from whome for their said preachīg sake they receaue their maintenance also that weomen may baptise, in the case of danger or necessity as they call it, &c. Admit this I say, yet notwithstanding forasmuch as those whom men call [...]uritans, doe seeke the reformation of these things, and others of the same kinde in [Page 64] a zeale of god, as is hereby manifest, in that for this cause they doe & are ready to forsake father and mother, wife and children, house and land, liberty with all the comforts of this life, yea life it selfe it god cal them therevnto: and are contented in and during this life to be of all men the most miserable: there is small cause why the Discouerer and the world with him, should hate, scorne, & so contemptibly vse them as if they were the o [...]cowring of the world, and refuse of the people. S. I [...]aule in the 9. to the Roma. calleth God to witnesse to his conscience, that he had great heauiness [...] and continuall sorrowe in his heart, and that he would wish himselfe to be seperated from god, vers 1. for his brethren that were his kin [...]men according to the flesh, and in the begining of the Chapter follwing, he vseth these wordes: Brethren my harts desire and prayer to god for Israell is, that they might be saued, his reasō therof followeth. For I beare them record, that they haue the zeale of God but not accordinge to knowledge. [...]ce [...] 1. If Paule were thus affected towards the Iewes, who were so exceedingly violent and outragious in whatsoeuer they went about in their blynde zeale, as at large appeareth by the story of the Actes of the Aposties▪ because they had in them a zeale of god: woulde hee, were he now liuing among vs, be so affected as the most are, towards the puritanes as they are tearmed, in whome it is manifest there is a zeale of god, be it that it were not according to knowledg? seing they doe nothing in their said zeale in a tumultuous, but all peaceable manner: as by prayer to god, and humble petition to her Maiestye the heade, and the body of this Realme met and ioyned togither in Parliament? either would S. Paule (trowe wee) call these men in scorne as the Disc. doth: * men of the ouerworne consistorian faction, men of the hum [...]ur of reformation, men more pure then the rest of their brethren, that is, puritanes: or with others precisians phantasticall men: &c. yea of Sathan Sathanist [...] as my self haue heard them called: because of theyre zeale, admit it were a blinde zea el: who for the blinde zeale that the Iewes had, called them so louingly brethren? It is not possible:
As from some thinges which might be obserued, so from these two places, and some other, especially that, page 15. (where vpon certaine worthy premises he collecteth, that in all likelihood, seing neither by learning nor sufficient arguments, they of the over-w [...]rne Consistorian facti [...]n could heeretofore preuayle, pag. 15. for the setting vp of their presbyteryall conceyts, they thought to supply their wants therein, by this deuise of castīg our diuells:) It may very probably be gathered, that the thinge which hath vexed the Disc. and made him sweate somuch about counterfeyting, is not the counter feyting, and teaching to counterfeyt a possession: nor his hatred and abomination to sinne, and in particular to this detestable cousenage: but his hatred against the instrumentes [Page 65] which god vsed in these great workes of his: whome, together with also [...] the same stamp, as from his soule he hath of long hated, so hereby was the same mightely increased, in that these kinde of men should be thought to haue such interest in Christ Iesus, as that at their (falsly termed) verball prayers, and hypocriticall fasting, he should as it were visibly descende from heauen, and tread downe Sathan vnder their feete. This said the Narrator before the Disc. came forth, cannot be indured. whereby we may se he coniectured aright. And mark what he therevpon out of the Apostle addeth: But god hath chosen the foolish thinges of the world to confound the wise, and the weake thinges of the worlde to [...]onfound the mighty. As if he had said: in that the Lord hath vsed in these rare and great workes of his, such weake and contemptible mē, we should rather considering the lordes manner of dealing, be confirmed thereby in these workes, & further assured that they are of god then kept from beleuing and embracing the same.
These are not dealt with but there must be a great assembly gathered togither in one corner or other: all of them such persons, as they knowe to be their frendes,pag. 6 [...] or at the least as their said frends doe bring with them, and are thought fit to be peruerted.
The falshood of this is heereby manifest, in that M. More and I knewe not those persons in Lancashire who ioyned with vs in prayer to god for the casting out of Sathan of the persons possessed, as they can witnesse: nor yet any one of them being meere strangers of them al [...] and they to vs: and at Nott. also they were generally vnknowne to me neither was their any choyce made by some of our frendes, At the [...] on of the 7 in Lancashire there were present about 40. & of [...]o. at N [...]. 15 [...]. and procuring of men to come, (as is well knowne to them that did come who were not a few) as the Disc. suggesteth: Besides this partly argueth, that (were there a counterfeytinge indeede) these our sayde frendes were confederates therein, which I think hardly any will sauour. It is maruaile that the Disc. affirmed not likewise that all those which haue seene Somers, Darling, and the 7. in Lancashire in their (pretended) fitts, were not my fre [...]d [...] (so should I haue some stoare of frends:) or at least that my frendes he speaketh of did bring them, or procure them to come, knowing them to be such as were like to be peruerted, for this he might as truly haue affirmed as the other: & this had bene to some purpose indeede, whereas the other is to none. It is strange therefore that he strayned not himselfe a little further: but though he doe it not heere, yet he saith something els-where bend [...]g this way: for speaking of the 12. Commissioners, he hath thes words * that they are not to be impeach [...]d, pag. 20 [...]. [...] their want of wisdom, as for their blynding the eye thereof, by their [...], they held with M. Darrell. Yf now the principall eye witne [...]es of S [...]m. [...]itts for [Page 66] wisdome, learning, and authority were thus affected towardes me [...] well may it be that the rest also were: And if by my frends I could pr [...] cure these persons to see So. in his fitts, who albeit for theire wisdome they were not easily to be deceyued, yet because of their proposterous affections were fitt to be peruerted, much more by the saide frends of myne might I procure meaner persons to see him, more fit to be peruerted then they. And this is to be supposed of the rest of our Demoniacks, viz. that the principall and other witnesses of their vexation were likewise blynded all, and euery of them with preposterous affection, which no man (sure) will beeleue, the Disc. excepted.
The end of the First Booke.
Darrell
This my supposed guiltynes is prooued two wayes,pag. 7 [...] first by Somers accusing me to haue taught him: Secondly, by circumstances arguing the same: deposed by diuers witnesses. In the accusation we are to obserue first, the accuser: secondly the accusation it selfe, lastly the circumstances confirming the same (as is pretended) deposed by others.
The accuser is William Somers, a yong man about the age of 22. yeares: who first is knowne to be a notorious and infamous lyar: for [Page 67] 4. times hath he varyed with that double and false tongue of his: somtimes affirming, at other times denying all counterfeyting: and eue [...]y of these times openly, and to an infinite nomber of men. 2. By his owne confe [...]sion he hath counterfeyted a possession: and if that were so, prophaned the holy exercise of prayer and fasting: and is therfore most vile and abominable. 3. Yf he haue counterfeyted, he is most horrible blasphemer:Yf that wretched & notorious Blaspheamous H [...]ck [...]t [...], were mistly & worthely condemned & executed, for such like blasphemie & indignities as this may it not seme strange that this lewde per [...]ned boy should be [...] cherished and much made of, by the Bish. & his C [...]aplen. hauing sometimes said there is no god: and sometimes vsed these wordes, I am * god: I am Christ, as is deposed. 4 He is a forsworne wretch: for he hath sworne both wayes, that hee hath counterfeyted, and that he hath not counterfeyted: yea with an execration, betaken himselfe to the diuell if euer he counterfeyted: he must needes therefore be forsworne. In regard heereof I answer that forasmuch as ther is only one witnessinge against me, I ought not therevpon without further proofe, neither by the ‘lawe of god, nor by the ciuill lawe, be held and adiudged as guilty.’ 2. I haue to all the articles framed against me out of his accusation, answered negatiuely and me thinketh were I a priuate man, in regarde of my educatyon, yeares, and life, I should be credited rather then Somers: much more being a minister of Christ Iesus and preacher of his gospell. 3. Besides my owne oath and protestation against this single accuser,Ans. * learned and graue deuines haue offered to be my compurgators: [...] Deut. 19. 15. Iohn, 8. 17. 2 cor. 13. 1. 2 which by the ciuill lawe (according to which I am to be iudged) doth aboundantly suffice for my purgation: seeing my owne without theires is sufficient.1 tim. 5. 19, I take exception against his testimony in regard of his vnworthynes, which appeareth by the premises. And because of this I a [...]irme,M. Iohn I [...]eton. M Iohn Brown [...] M. Robert Ev [...] gton, M. Tho. Boulto [...] pag. 244. that there is no body testifying against me the crime layde to my charge: for there is none but Somers (as by that which followeth is made euident,) and he in all lawe is nullus testis: no witnesse.