TRACT 1. TO THE KINGS MOST EXCELLENT MAIESTIE.
AMONG so many and so important reasons (most Gratious Soue [...]aigne as are preuailing more th [...]n ordinary in question of the truth ther doth none occur of greater satisfaction, then such as is graced with answerableMr. Whitaker. de ecclesia cōtrou. 2. quaest. 5. cap. 14. initio. pag. 366. saith firmum sit necesse est argumentum illud quod sumitu [...] ex aduersariorum confessione: &c. efficax enī erit aduersariorum ipsorū contra ipsos testimonium &c. et quidem fateor veritatem etiam e suis inimicis testimonium extorque re. &c. acknowledgement of the learned aduersarie: And seeing it is the honourable priuiledgeHereby wee vnderstand the Puritane preachers & their complices. of our CATHOLICKE faith, to be so Iustified by her enimies, of whom neuerthelesse many (to make vs more odious and deiected) haue (of their inueterate hatred) busied them selues in their daily Sermons and other-wise neuer more then now of late, publikely to depraue our professed religion with all vnworthy and scandalous calumniation, perplexing so against vs, euen the more sober and quiet iudgements, with a dispersed contagion of their sophisticated (& to vs most dangerous) incantations; we cannot therfore in so greate necessity of times, (in our owne defence) vse either a more proper Antidote to expell the poison of such their intemperate and impurest language, or lesse offensiue [Page] meanes to your MAIESTIE, for the appeasing of our former continued calamities, so farre as to your PRINCELY and Christian wisdome may seeme requisite, then if in this our needfull Apologie vndertaken wholly to that end, we do professe purposely to abstaine from all such matter as remaineth questionable, contenting our selues only with that, which is in it selfe euident or otherwise acknowledged for true by learned Protestants them selues. The which also we will acco [...]dingly endeuour hereby to accomplish, not with insulting against them in matter of vnnecessary and vnkinde exprobration nor yet with affected entertainement of prolonged discourse,1. Cor. 2, 4. Neither in the persuasible words of humane wisdome: but humbly, breifly, and plainely, as being very confidēt, that naked truth, presented thus to your HIGHNES though but in her natiue and simple habitt, shall yet neuerthelesse, appeere in vewe of so vnde [...]standing a minde, both gratious and regardable:
THAT ENGLISH MEN VVERE aboue 1000 yeares since conuerted to the now professed Catholicke faith. §. 1.
PLEASETH it therfore your most excellent Maiestie to call to mind, that it is now somewhat aboue oneMr. Couper late Bishop of Lincolne, in his chronicle fol. 156. a. affirmeth our conuersion to haue bene Anno Do. 599. and Mr. Foxe in his actes & monuments, printed 1576. pag 117. a. prope finem affirmeth the like. thousand yeares since Gregorie then Bishoppe of Rome, for his vertue and learning surnamed the Great, a man highly commended both by FathersS. Gregorie is commended by Damascen in orat. de defunctis: by Isodore. de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis cap. 27. and by the Fathers of the eight Toletane Councell. can. 2. and by S. Bede hist. l. 2. c. 1. andMr. D. Humfrey in Iesuitissimi. part. 2. rat. 5. pag. 624. saith: Gregorius nomine quidem magnus & reuera magnus, vir magnis & multis diuinae gratiae dotibus exornatus: &c. And Mr. Godwyne in his catalogue of the Bishopps of England. p. 3. ante med. saith: That Blessed & holy Father S. Gregory was the occasion of replanting the Christian faith in our country: and Mr. W [...]itaker cōtra Duraeum. l. 5. pag. 394. fine. saith. quod nos magno beneficio affecit Gregorius, id semper gratissima memoria recolemus: Protestants, conuerted vs Englishe men (by the preaching of Austine) from heathenish infidellitie to the faith of Christ.
Concerning the religion professed by Gregory, and wherunto we were as then so by him conuerted, it was so vndoubtedly our now professed Catholicke faith, that the protestant writers (not of vulgar note but those that are for learning reputed most accomplished, do for such throughout euery particuler specially and at largeIn prooffe that our then cōuersion was to euery perticuler pointe of our now profess [...]d Catholike faith, Mr. D. Humfrey in Iesuitissimi part. 2. rat. 5. pag. 626. & 627. saith. In ecclesiam vero quid inuexerunt, Gregorius & Augustinus. onus caeremoniarum: &c. intulerunt pallium archiepiscopale ad sola Missarum solemnia: Purgatorium &c. oblationē salutaris hostiae, & preces pro demortuis &c. reliquias, &c. transubstātiationē, &c. nouas templorū consecrationes &c. ex quibus omnibus quid aliud quaesitum est, quam vt indulgentiae, monachatus, Papatus reliquūque Pontificiae superstitionis chaos extruatur? Haec autem Augustinus magnus monachus, a Gregorio monacho edoctus, importauit Anglis: &c. Also Luke Osiander in his epitom. historiae ecclesiasticae centuria sexta pag. 289. fine. & 290. initio. describeth it yet more perticulerly, saying. Augustinus romanos ritus, & consuetudines Anglicanis ecclesijs obtrusit, nimirum Altaria, Vestes, Imagines, Missas, Calices, Cruces, Candelabra Thuribula, Vexilla, sacra Vasa, Lustrales aquas, Romanarum ceremoniarum codices: &c. And ibid. pag. 288 prope finem. he saith of Gregorie, in pluribus articulis turpiter & pontificié hallucinatus est, nam & libero arbitio & bonis operibus nimium tribuit, de poenitentia non recte docet, caelibatum ministrorum ecclesiae acriter vrsit, inuocationem Sanctorum eorumqué cultum, sed & imaginum idolatricam venerationem approbauit, palliauit, & defendit: Also the Centurie writers of Magdeburg in their sixt Centurie ca. 10. col. 748. circa med. make like report of Austines doctrine to vs English men. And collecting (els where in the sam [...] booke) out of Gregories owne writings by them recited certaine his opinions which th [...] hould for erroneous, as being popish they do in their index or Alphabeticall table of tha [...] sixt centurie at the word Gregorij specially set downe (with figures of p [...]rticuler reference w [...] euery such said opinion is to be found, as followeth.) eiusdem error de bonis operibus, de [...] [...]sessione, de coniugio, de ecclesia, de Sanctorū inuocatione, de inferno, de Iustificatione, [...] [...]rbitri [...] de Paenitentia, de Purgatorio, de Satisfactione,: Also they charge him ye [...] [...] [...]itings with Consecration of Aultars, Chalices, and Corporalls: col. 369. fine. with Oblati [...] [...]rifice for the dead col. 473. post med. with Exorcisme col. 376. circa med. with translati [...] [...]ues. col. 381. fine. & 382. with Monachisme. 383. initio. & 384. with Pilgrimage. co [...] [...] with Consecration of Churches, with Masse, Reliques and sprinckling of holy water. [...] with Con [...] [...], of [...]ap [...]e, of [...]o [...]ia, and O [...]le: [...]l. 367. prope in [...]um. [...]h C [...]r [...]ti [...]n of Masse: [...]. 36 [...]. [...]n [...] & 370. [...]i [...]o, & 693. post med. & [...] in [...]: & with Claime & exercise of Iurisdiction & P [...]macie ouer all Churches: [...]ol. 425, 426, 427, 428 429, 430. 431. 432. &c. with which last point concerninge Primacie he is in like manner charged and reproued by Mr. D. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatory pag. 310. ante med. and by Peter Martir in cap. 8. iudicum. describe it: Mr. Doctor Fulke tearming it therfore in generall our peruersion Mr. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatory. pag. 333. initio.: Danaeus also calling it, inebriatio Danaeus in resp. ad disputat. Bellarm. part. 1. pag. 780. fine. meretricis de qua est apoc. 17. vers. 4: and Mr. Harison confessing likewise thatMr. William Harrison in his description of Brittanie set before Holl [...]nshed great Chronicle volum. 1. (after the last edition) pag. 29. b. line 11. And see his other more plaine wordes. ibidem. pag. 27. a. line 27. Austine came and brought in Poperie: with whom agreeth Mr. Bale, affirming that Aust. Mr. Bale in catalog. scriptorum illustrium maioris Britaniae cent. 14. pag. 117. saith of Austine, plebem per interpretes fidem papisticam docuit. by his interpreters taught our people the Papisticall faith with the profession [Page 4] whereof they doubt not likewise sin plaine tearmes,) perticularly to charge certaine famous and godly learned English men, who liued in the ages nexte after our said conuersion, as namelyMr. Bale in Catallog scriptorum illustrium maioris Britaniae centur. 14. pag. 145. speaking of their martirdome saith: Passisunt pro papismo papistici Martires Anno 693. And see further the Centurie writers cent. 7. cap. 6. col. 154. and Luc. Osiander in epitom. cent. 7. l. 4. c. 20. pag. 331. circa & post med. the two (memorable) brethren named Eualdi whom they therefore call Papisticall: and S. Bede whom they likewise expresly charge with Luc. Osiander in epitom. cent. 8. l. 2. c. 3. pag. 58. initio saith of Beda: Omnibus pontificijs erroribus (in articulis in quibus nos hodie a Papa dissentimus) inuolutus est &c. and saieth yet further of him, bonus fuit vir: error in all those popish articles wherin they at this day dissent from the Pope: and yet (that his profession notwithstanding) they do thinke him worthy of the surname ofMr. Foxe in his acts and monuments printed 1576. pag. 128. b. initio, and M. Couper in his chronicle at the yeare 724. fol. 168. b. and Hollinshead in his great Chronicle of the last edition volum. 1. pag. 130 b. initio. reuerende not doubting to number him amongstMr. D. Humfrey in Iesuitismi. part. 2. rat. 3 pag. 326. ante medium. the godly men raysed vp by the holy Ghost.
THAT THE SAME FAITH VVAS VNIuersally professed for sundry ages before, and was also agreeable to that first faith, where to the Brittons of Wales were conuerted in the Apostles times. § 2.
[...] (most dreed Soueraigne) being our confessed Catholicke religion, whereunto most vn [...]oubtedly we were (so many ages since) thus conuerted, [Page 5] and for which we haue of late yeares endured such affliction, was not as then priuate only vnto Rome, or vs Englishmen, but (as our aduersaries do complaine) was vniuersaly thē Mr. Parkins in his exposition of the Creed pag 307. saith: During the spa [...] of nine hundred yeares the popish heresie hath spread: selfe ouer the wholle earth professed through the Christi [...]n worlde, neither first as then became so vniuersall, but (as they yet further complaine and acknowledge) continued such for sondry ages then before.Mr. Iohn Nappeir in his treatise vppon the reuelations dedicated to your Maiestie pag. 68 prope sinem saieth. Betweene the yeare of Christ 300 & 316. the Antichristian and papisticall reigne begunne reigning vniuersally and without any debatable contradiction. 1260 yeares. Re [...]gning vniuersally (saith Mr. Nape [...]e) and without any debateable contradiction, (euen) twelue hundreth sixtie yeares: nexte ensewing the first 300. yeares after Christ,Mr. Nappeire vbi supra pag. 145. fine faith. Euen 1260 yeares the Pope and his Cleargie hath poss [...]ssed the outward visible Church of Christians: And with this accompt of Mr. Napeir agreeth Mr. Broca [...]d in his treatise vpon the reuelations fol. 110. a. circa med. vvhere he affirmeth, that the Church was trodden downe and oppressed by the papacie, euen from Siluesters time, vnto these times: which he there and fol. 123. (b) collecteth to be during the said 1260 yeares the Pope and his Clergie during all that time poss [...]ssing the outward visible Church of Christians. In so much that whereas our learned aduersaries do truly affirme (as being vndoubted) that our neighbours the Brittons of Wales,M. Camden in his Britannia &c. pag. 40. circa med. saith: Certum est Britannos in ipsa ecclesiae infancia christianam religionem imbibisse: In proofe, thereof he there alleadgeth sondrie auncient authorities. pag. 40. circa med. And pag. 157. paulo post med. he saith. In hac floruit monasterium Glastenburie quod antiquam repetit originem a Iosepho Arimathensi. &c. hoc enim & antiquissima huius monasterij monumenta testantur &c. Nec est cur de hac re ambigamus. And Mr. Harrison in his description of Brittannie annexed to Hollinshead his great chronicle of the last edition: volum. 1. pag. 23 a. l. 18. saith: that Ioseph preached here in England in the Apostels times, his sepulcher yet in Glastenburie and Epitaph affixed therto is proofe sufficient: Also Mr. HENOCH CLAPHAM in his soueraigne remedie against Schisme pag. 24. speaking of the conuersion of the Brittons in the Apostles times saith therof. Our Schismatickes may as well aske me what assurance I haue there was a King Henry, as demaund what assurance I haue of the other. This point is also yet further affirmed by Mr. D. FVLKE in his booke against Heskins, Sanders &c. pag. 561. sect. 71. and in his confutation of Purgatorie pag. 332. also by Mr. GODWINE in his catolog. of Bishoppes. &c. pag. 1. initio. receiued the Mr. BALE in his pageant of Popes saith: The Brittons being conuerted by Ioseph of Aramathia held that faith at Austines coming: And D. FVLKE against the Rhemish Testament in 2. Cor 12. sect. 5. fol. 316. a circa med. saith The Catholicke Brittons with whome Christian Religion had continued in succession from the Apostles times would not receaue Austine: And in his answere to a counterfait Catholicke pag. 49. fine he saith: The Britons before Austins coming, continued in the faith of Christ euen from the Apostles times And Mr. FOXE in his acts and monuments printed 1576. pag. 463. a circa med. saith: [Page 6] faith of Christ by the preaching of the Apostles & helde that faith at Austines comming not being (as they yet further affirme) in the meane timeIn proofe that the Brittons of wales at and before Austines coming into England were not altered by th [...] ROMAN Church: Mr. D. HVMFREY In Iesuitissimi. part. 2. rat. 3. pag. 304. circa med. saith: Habuerunt Brittanni templa sibi non Romanis, qui tum Romano iugo non erant subditi, nec Romanā religionē suscipiebant, nec Augustinum Apostolum suum agnoscebant: Et vide ibidem. pag. 624. fine. Also Mr. Doct. FVLKE in his confutation of Purgatory pag. 372. initio saith. It appeareth that this Land did neuer receaue the doctrine and ceremonies of the lattin Church, before the time of the Saxons. altred or corrupted by the Romane Church:The Brittons after the receauing of the faith, neuer forsooke it for any manner of false preaching of other nor for torments. &c. In the speciall proofe whereof (as being most certainly true)Mr. D. BARLOWE in his defence of the articles of the Protestants religion pag. 21. affirmeth the Church of, he Brittons to be as auncient euery day, and as Christian euery way as the R [...]mane, affirming further, the integritie therof (or not being altered by the Church of Rome) first by their obseruation of Easter different from Austine: Secondly by the opposition which they made against Austine: Mr. D. Barlowe seriously laboureth: it is neuerthelesse euident by S. Bede who liuedBede did write his historie thereof Anno. 724. as witnesseth Mr. Cowper in his Cronicle fol. 168. b. so nere to those times and write the Historie therof. And is also acknowledged since by Protestant writers, that vpon conference then had at a place thereof called in Bedes timeBed [...] hist. lib. 2. c. 2. initio saith Augustinus adiutorio vsus Edilberthi Regis, conuocauit ad suam colloquium, Episcopos siue doctores maximae & proximae Britonum prouinciae, in loco vbi vsque hodie linqua anglorum Augustineizat appellatur: And Holenshead in his greate Coronicle of the last edition. volum. 1. l. 5. c. 21. pag. 102. b. line. 33. 40. &c. maketh like mention hereof. Austineizat betwene Austine and the Britton Bishops, who at the first frowardly resisted Austine all they could, (for which Mr. Foxe not vniustly reproueth thē)Mr. Fox in his acts and Monuments printed 1576. pag. 120. b. the greatest differences thē stood vpon betwene Austen and them, were expresselie and only mencioned to beBeda hist. l. 2. c. 2. paulo post med. reporteth how Austine said to the Brittons: si in tribus his obtemperare mihi vultis vt Pascha. suo tempore celebretis, vt ministerium Baptizandi quod co renascimur iusta morem romanae & apostolicae ecclesiae compleatis, vt genti Anglorum vna nobiscum praedicetis verbum Domini, cetera quae agitis quamuis moribus nostris contraria, equanimiter cuncta tollerabimu [...]. And the like is testified by Hollenshead volum. 1. pag. 103. a. line 17. and by Mr. Godwine in his catallog. of the Bishopes. &c. pag. 6. ante med. their dissent from the vse of the Romane Church in their (Ceremonies) or ministring [Page 7] of Baptisme and keeping of Easter: which let er (as Luc.Luc. Osiander in epitom. cent. 2. l. 3. c. 2. pag. 51. circa med. saith: Ioannes & Philippus apostoli Pascha celebrauerant decima quarta luna post aequinoxium vernum, quo tempore Iudaei etiam pascha suum celebrare solebant, idque apostoli haud dubie fecerunt in gratiam corum Iudae orum, qui nuper ad Christum conuersi fuerunt, & vt plures etiam Iudaeos Christo lucrifacerent: Osiander witnesseth from antiquitie) was tollerated by the Apostles in re [...]arde of the knowne weakenes of some, euen as for like respectact. 16.3. Circumcision was by them in like sorte tollerated, andact. 15.29. abstinence from blood and that which was stra [...]g [...]ed specially prescribed: By which their so earnest dissenting about these only maters of smaller importance, is most plainely signifiedFor the Brittons who Contradicted Austine and that so earnestly about these so fewe and smaller points, would neuer haue ben silent, but much the rather haue with-stoode him in the other so many and in comparablie much greter points of faith, had they in like sorte disagreed from him therein: their full agreement in all other substantiall and head points of faith: Which thing is also as yet more certainely euident, aswell in that the Britton Bishopes as thenBeda hist. l. 2. c. 2. ante med. saith, tum Britones quidem confitentur intellexisse seueram esse viam Iusticiae, quam praedicaret Augustinus: Hereof also see Hollenshead vbi supra pag. 102. b. line 54. Confessed that [Page 8] it was the right way of iustice & righteousnes which Austine taught: As also for thatMr. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatorie, pag. 335. prope finem. Austine did (as Mr. Fulke affirmeth at the last obtaine the aide of the Brittish Bishopes to the conuersion of the S [...]xons: So euidently doth that faith which Austine taught vs, and which the Protestants acknowledge for Popish, demonstrate it selfe in generall to be consonant & agreable with that primatiue faith whereunto the Brittons of wales were (as is confessed) cōuerted in the Apostles times: which point is as yet made much more euident by like further obseruation of so many other remote Nations conuerted in the Apostles times as namely of Gracia Armenia. India, &c. which although they be in some things departed from the faith whereto they were first conuerted, yet by their remnante of religion to this day preserued, sufficiently appeareth what faith it was whether Catholicke or Protestant, whereto they were at first conuerted, and from which they be so in some pointes at this day departed witnes hereof are the seuerall publickeSee in those Liturgies mention made of Reall Presence, Sacrifice Praier for the dead, Praier to Saints &c. Liturgies of the Cratians, Armeniās &c. further witnes also hereof is their late professed agreement orOsiander in Epitom. histor. eccles. centur 15. pag. 477. post med. saith. Anno 1430. conuocaret (Papa) Eugenius quartus, concilium Florentiae &c. huic concilio etiam Graeci Atmenij Iacoboini consenserunt and, Mr. Marbecke in his common places. pag. 258. post med. acknowledgeth that at the Councell of Florence the Christians of Armenia and India consented to the Romane Church, and that the Greekes agreed &c. also Abdisu Primate of the Armenians subscribed to the late Councell of Trent. s [...]bmission to our Catholicke Church; and most full and plaine witnes hereof is the aunswerableIt appeareth by the treatise published by the Protestants diuerse of Wittenberg Anno. 1584. entituled acts theologorum witebergensium & Hieremiae Patriarchae Constantinop. &c. that the Greeke Church at this day though deuided from the Lattin, professeth to beleeue Inuocation of Saints, Relickes, worshipping of Images, Transubstantiation, Sacrifice, the signifying Ceremonies of the Masse. Auriculer Confession: Enioyned Satisfaction: Confirmation with Chrisme: Extreme vnction: all the seuen Sacraments: Prayer for the dead: Free will: Monachisme: Vowed Chastitie: the fast of Lent: that Preistes may not marry after orders taken &c. see this alledged in perticuler hereafter Tract. 1. ss. 7. in the margent at Figur. 11. And Chrispinus in his discourse of the estate of the Church pag. 253. initio: affirmeth that Anno 870. the greeke and Lattin Churches became deuided only for the Primacie and diuersitie of Ceremonies: so fully did they at that time consent in all other pointes: And concerning the other orientall Churches further remote, Osiander (in epitom. histor. eccles. centur. 16. pag. 970. post med.) saith, Hoc Anno. 1585. Christiani qui &c. the yeare 1585. the Christians who inhabit neere to Mount Libanus, became at last Conquered, and subiect to the Turkish Empyre, neither is that to be maruailed at, for the Christians in the East haue not sincere religion, but are in most parte of Articles Popishly. Testimonie of our learned aduersaries: By which foresaid examples of so many remote nations, so far distant each from other, as namely Wales Graetia, Armenia India &c. ConuertedAs concerning the conuersion in the Apostles times of Armenia: See Chemnitius examen. part. 2. pag. 7. b. Paulo ante med. when he saith, Armenit Bartholomeus Euangelium praedicauit. of the like conuersion of Indiae: See Osiander centur. 1. pag. 37 circa med. & Paulus venetus l. 3. cap. 27. & 43. and Hayton Armen. l. de tartaris cap. 6. the like conuersion of Graecia appeareth by Paules epistles to sondry of that Nation as to the Corinthians Ephesians Thesalonians. And see reuelat. 1, 11. & concerning the like confessed conuersiō of Wales See heretofore pag. 4. in the margent there at the letter. [...]. vndoubtedly all of them in the Apostles times, and agreeing so far with vs and against our aduersaries in so many principall points of faith, is not obscurely signified that our now Catholicke Religion is that Primatiue faith, which the Apostles them selues first planted in all nations.
A FARTHER DEMONSTRATION BY Confessed Testimonie from the Fathers that it was taught in the Apostles time. §. 3.
VVHICH antiquitie or prescription of our professed Catholicke Doctrine vp to those Apostolicke times is also made as yet much more probable or rather euident, by that which our learned aduersaries them selues do yet further acknowledge and collect from the writings of the more ancient Fathers: To goe through eueryconcerning euery perticuler see more fully hereafter Tract. 2. c. 1. sect. 3. perticuler would be ouer tedious to your MAIESTIE and improper to this place:
Vouchsafeth therefore your HIGHNES that we may giue instance in such as be cheefe.
1 First concerning vowes it is acknowledged thatPeter Martir de votis pag. 490. fine. saith: erant ergo Clementis aetate professiones castitatis & vota fateor. Iam tum inceperant homines deflectere a verbo dei. &c. the profession and vowes of Chastitie were extant amonge Christians in the time of Clement Bishope of Alexandria thatPeter Martir ibidem. pag. 524. fine saith Scio epiphaniū cum multis alijs ex patribus in eo errare, quod peccatū esse dicant votum huiusmodi violare cum opus fuerit, & male illum id referre in traditiones Apostolicas: Epiphanius & many other Fathers erred therin: thatcentur. 3. c. 6. col. 140. line. 27 & centur. 3. c. 7. col. 176. line. 39. Tertulian and Ciprian taught vowes of Chastitie: That the same haue bene vsedCaluin institut. l. 4. c. 13. sect. 17. ab vltima memoria, and antiquitus receptum: thatPeter Martir de celebatu & votis versus finem. imediately after the Apostles times to much was attributed to vowes: that Ignatius him selfe (though their scholler) signifieth in his epistles: his centur. 2. c. 4. col. 64. line. 40. It is said ex epistolis Ignasij apparet homines iam tum paulo impensius caepisse amare & venerari virginitatis studium, nam in epist. ad Antioch. ait: virgines videant, cui se consecrarins. to much liking of that profession: andCentur. 2. c. 10. col. 167. line 24. de virginitate minus comode loquitur. speaketh incommodiously of virginitie. Abraham Scultetus in his medulla theologiae Patrum. pag. 450. circa med. alleageth Ignatius saying ad Philadelp. Saluto collegium: virginū wherupon he imediately inferreth: Ergone in illo ecclesiae flor [...] fuerunt, quae castitatem & continentiam perpetuam profiterentur Virgines? fuerunt omninq. &c. saluting (and affirming Colleges of Virgines: and so plainely, that our learned) [Page 10] aduersaries doe there-vpon affirme, how that euenScultetus vt supra. in that flower of the Church there were Virgins, that professed Perpetuall Chastitie that lastly S. Ambros and Epiphanius deriuePeter Martir de coelibatu & votis. pag. 543. paulo post med. & pag. 525. initio. Professed Chastitie from the institution of S. Paule:
2 Secondly cōcerning the Reall presence of Christs body in the Sacrament, the reseruation thereof, and the mixture of water with wine in the Challice: concerninge the first, it is affirmed that Gregory, the greateHumfred. Iesuitissimi part. 2. tat. 5. pag. 626. post med. taught transubstantiation thatThe Centurie writers. cent. 5. col. 517. l. 23 say: Chrisostomus transubstantionem videtur confirmare, nam ita scribit. &c. Chrisostome is thought to confirme transubstantiation: thatCentur. 4. c 10. col. 985. line. 30 Eusebius Emissen did speake vnprofitablely of transubstantiation: thatAothonie de Adamo in his Anotomie of the Masse. fol. 221. a. fine. & see the centurie writers, cent. 4. cap. 4. col. 295. l. 3 And oecolampadius in libro epistolarum oecolā padij & Zuinglij. lib. 3. p. 765. the bookes of Sacraments ascribed to Ambros, affirme the opinion of Christs Bodely Presence in the Sacrament: wherin Peter Martir likewise professeth toPeter Martir in defens. obiect. Gardner. part. 4. pag. 724. And see also Peter Martirs further dislike of Cyrils s [...]yings in his epistles annexed to his cōmon places in English, his epistle there to Beza pag. 106. b ante medium. where he saith. I will not so easely subscribe to Cyrill, who affirmed such a communion, as therby euen the substance of the flesh and blood of Christ first is ioyned to the blessing. (for so he calleth the holy Bread) &c. And in his epistle to Caluine ibidem pag. 98. a. ante med. he proueth further for this opinion Cyrill and some other Fathers. dislike the Iudgment of Cirill: thatIn the treatise attributed to Vrsinus entitled Commonefactio cuiusdam theologi. de S. caena & eiusdem commonefactionis consideratio pag. 211. & 218. In Ciprian are many sayings which seeme to affirme transubstantiation: in so much as they doThe sermon of Cyprian de caena Domini, which this foresaid testimonie concerneth, is dedicated to Cornelius who was Bishoppe of Rome when Cyprian liued, and to whom Cyprian him selfe l. 1. ep. 1. & ep. 3. did write, in so much that Mr. Fulke against the Rhemish testament in 1. cor. cap. 11. fol. 282. a. circa medium alleageth testimonie from thence, affirming that the Author de caena Domini was not in time much inferior to Cyprian. vnworthely affirme that Sermon of his in which those sayings are extant to be counterfaite: that lastly Ignatius Mr. Whitgift in his defence against Carthwrightes reply pag. 408. ante med. who was S. Iohns scholler, & liued in Christs time did (as Theoderet 1200 yeares since, & them selues now doTheodoret. dial. 3. and Hamelmanus de traditionibus apostolicis &c. col. 746. line 18. 19. 22, 23 &c. alleageth not only Theodoret but also one Wydefortus alledging Anno 1396. this saying of Ignatius, out of an auncient copie of that time. affirme, and as the Lutheranes [Page 11] do obiectVide recitationes de concilio scripti libri concordiae &c. (printed Lipsiae 1581.) nona recitat. p. 177. ante medium. in proofe of their Reall presence, say of the heretickes in his time, they do not admitt Euchariste and oblations, because they do not confesse the Eucariste to be the flesh of our Sauiour Iesus Christ, which flesh suffered for our sinnes: and one of our aduersaries confesseth accordingly, thatAdamus Francisci in Margarita theologica. p. 256. saith. Commentum Papistarum de transubstantiatione mature in ecclesiam irrepsit. Transubstantiatiō entred early into the Church: and an other saithAnthonie de Adamo in his Anotomie of the Masse pag. 236. a. ante med. I haue not yet hetherto beene able to knowe, when this opinion of the Reall and bodily being of Christ in the Sacrament did beginne:
As concerninge reseruation of the Sacrament: whereas according to our aduersaries Doctrine,Mr. Willet in his synopsis pag. 460. ante med. It is no Sacrament vnlesse it be receaued. The contrary was so plainely taught and practized, euen in the more ancient times of S. Chrysostom,Chrisostom. in ep. 1. ad Innocentium. CiprianCyp. in serm. de lapsis post med. Ireneus,Ireneus apud Eusebium hist. l. 5. c. 24. Iustine,Iustine in Apolog. 2. prope finem. &c. that Mr. Fulke confesseth hereof sayingFulke against Heskins Sanders &c. pag. 77. prope finem. That the Sacrament (of some) was reserued in the elder dayes of the Church, is not so great a controuersie, as whether it ought to be reserued. and Caluine acknowledgethCaluine. instit. l. 4. cap. 17. sect. 39. the reseruation of the Sacrament (to be) veteris ecclesiae exemplum,See Peter Martir. lib. contra Gardinerū obiect. 88. the example of the auncient Church: & (to omitte others) Chemnitius doth likewise acknowledge that Chemnitius examē part. 2. p. 102. a. paulo post me [...]iū. witnesses of this custome of priuate reseruation of the Eucharist, are Tertulian, Ciprian, Ambrose, Hierom, Basile, &c. and thatChemnitius ibid. certaine of the aunicent Fathers greately commended the same, as Nazianzen, Ambrose &c. and that it was,Chemnitius ibid. antiqua consuetudo late patens & diu propagata. In so much as PeterSee this hereafter tract. 1. sect. 8. pag. 57. in the margent at at the letter .k. Martir cannot but acknowledge that (by the testimonie of S. Cirill) the anthropomorphites were specially condemned for their impugning of the Sacraments reseruation:
As concerning the minglinge of water with wine in the Chalice before consecration of the Sacrament It is so abundantly testified by the FathersIustine apol. 2. fine and Ireneus l. 5. c. 1. Cypr. l. 2. ep. 3. Ambros l. 5. de sacramentis cap. 1. & l. 4. c. 5. Hierom. in morc. c. 14. Austine tract. 120 in Io [...]n. & de eccles. dog. cap. 75. & de doctrina Christiana lib. 4. c. 21 Euseb. emissen. ser. 5. de Paschate. concil. 3. Carthag. can. 24. & concil. Auraicen. can. 17. & concil. 3. brach. c [...]n. 1. & concil. tribur. can. 21. & concil Aphrican. can. 4. & ex capitulis graec. synd. c. 55 & concil. 6. constātinop. can. 32 of all [Page 12] ages and Countries, that Mr. Whitguifte saith.Mr. Whitgift in his defence &c. pa. 473. prope initium. Ciprian was greately ouer-seene in making it a matter so necessary, in caelebration of the Lordes Supper, to haue water mingled with wine, which was at that time no doubt, common to moe then to him: Mr. Carthwright likewise acknowledgeth thatMr. Carthwrite alleaged in Mr. Whitgifts foresaide defence. p. 525 fine. in the minglinge of water with wine, a necessitie and greate misterie was placed, as may appeare (saith he) both by Iustine Martir and Ciprian: and Mr. Iewell speaketh of this mixture, confesseth in like manner saying,Mr. Iewell in his reply pag. 34. paulo antemed. in deede S. Ci [...]rian and certaine olde Fathers, spake of it, and f [...]r [...] it much, adde but now hereto, that the Armenians being the first wee reade of, that denied the mixture, [...]ffirming (with our aduersaries) th [...]t only wine wa [...] to be vsed, were therefore speciall [...] condēned of error, as witnesTheophilac [...]. in Io [...]n. cap. 19. [...]nom [...] the water & blood which issued from Christs side: saith. Confund [...]ntur Armenij qui non admiscent in misterijs aquā vino, non enim credunt vt videtur, [...]uod aqua ex latere egressa sit. Theop [...]ilact and the Fathers of the si [...]t CouncellCouncil. 6. constantinop. can. 32, saith. Nouimus quod in Armenianorum Regione vinum tā tum in sacra mensa offerunt aquam illi non miscentes, qui sacrificium incruentum peragunt: which their vsage that councell there condemneth, saving there further against it, nam & Iacobus Domini nostri Iesu Christi frater. &c. & Basilius Cesareae Archiepis [...]opus. &c. mistico nobis in scripto tradito sacrificio, ita per agendum in sacro misterio ex aqua & vino sacrum poculum ediderunt. of Constantinople, who (aboue a thousand yeres since) alleaged against themibidem vt supra. S. Iames his Liturgie in proofe of the foresaide mixture:
3 Thirdly as concerning Antichrist, Altars, and sacrifice, Mr. Whitaker confesseth touching Antichrist saying,Whitaker. l. de Antichristo. pag. 21. the Fathers for the most parte thought that Antichrist should be but one man. But in that as in many other thinges they erred: concerning the short time of his persecutiō or raigne gathred from the scriptures. Mr. Fox confesseth thatFoxe in Apoc. c. 12 pag. 345. post medium. almost all the holy and learned interpreters do by a time, times, and halfe a time vnderstand only three y [...]ares and a halfe: affirming further to beFoxe in Apoc. ca. 13 pag. 392. fine. the consent and opinion of almost all the auncient Fathers. As concerning Aultars and Sacrifice, (which as D. Rainoldes grauntethD. Rainlodes in his conferrence with Mr. Hart pag. 552. fine. are linked by nature in relation & mutuall dependance one of other. And first concerning [Page 13] Aultars: Peter Martir reproueth the auncient Fathers, saying,Peter Martir in his common places in english. part. 4. p. 225. b. post med. Petrus Alexandrinus &c. attributeth more to the outward Aultar then to the liuely Temples of Christ. And yet further against Optatus:Peter Martir ibidem. p. 226. a. initio. Optatus l. 6. ag [...]inst Parmenianus saith, what is the Aultar? Euen the seate of the Body and Blood of Christ: ibidem. such sayings as th [...]se (saith Peter Martir) edified not the people &c. and in no lesse plaine maner is Optatus foresaid saying mentioned and reproued by the centuriecent. 4. c. 6. col. 409. l. 25. writers:Peter Martir in his common places part. 4 pag. 225. b. ante med. As also Peter Martir, reproueth the Fathers in generall, saying the Fathers shoulde not with so much libertie haue seen ed he [...]re and there to haue abused the name Altar: Now as concerning sacrifice, it is affirmed, by our learned aduersaries that the more auncient Fathers, namlySee this affirmed by Caluin hereafter pa. 145. in the margent vnder the letter. t. at Anno. 320 Athanasius, Ambrose, Austine, Arnobius, &c. erred herein, and so fully, that their supper (is therefore saide to haue) carried the face of a renewed oblation, imitating ouer n [...]r [...]ly the Iewish manner of sacrificing &c. that they Caluin. in omnes Pauli epist. in haebr. c. 7 vers. 9. pag. 924. b. forged a sacrifice in the Lords supper with out his Commaundement, and so adulterated the supper with adding of sacrifice: that also the writinges of Ireneus and Ignatius, (who are most auncient are herein)Cent. 2. c. 4. col. 63 line 9. & cent. 2. cap. 10 col. 167. line 17. and see hereafter pag. 145 in the margent vnder the letter .t. & at Anno 90. & 170 incommodious and dangerous: and thatSebastianus Francus in his epist. de abrogandis in vniuersum omnibus statutis ecclesiasticis. presently after the Apostles times, the Supper of our Lord was turned into a sacrifice. In so much as some of our aduersaries doubt not to charge the auncient Fathers euen with propitiatoryAndreas Christianus lib. de opificio Missae pag. 167. initio reciting the Fathers opinion hereof saith: Dicta autem Patrum non solum impetrationem sed etiam intrinsecant quandam vim placandi Inuunt Origines hom. 13 in Leuiucum a [...]t: ista est commemoratio sola quae propitium facit Deum hominibus. Athanasius in sermone de defunctis apud Damascenum ait: incruentae hostiae oblatio propitiatio est. To which end he alleageth likewise further the perticuler sayings of Ambrose, Chrisostome, Augustine, Gregorie, Bede, and of the 3. Councell of Brach: and concerning the Fathers further testimonies for Masse see more hereafter Tract 3. Sect 1. in the margent at the letter .t. sacrifice, and sacrifice for the dead: So chargeable were the ancient Fathers no lesse then we now are, in that greate question of sacrifice.
[Page 14]4 Fourthly concerning Praier for the dead it is graunted thatMr. George Gifford in his demonstration that our Brownists be full Donatistes pag. 38 and see hereafter pa. 44 post med. & pag. 45. it was generall in the Church longe before the daies of Augustine, as it appeareth in Ciprian and Tertulian: that alsoMr. Fulk in his confutation of Purgatorie pag. 362 ante med & vide ibid. p. 303 circa med. & 393 post med. Tertulian, Ciprian, Austine, Hierome, and a greate many more, do witnes that sacrifice for the dead i [...] the tradition of the Apostles. That likewise praier for the dead is taught in the writingsMr. D. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatorie pag. 353 & 354 ante med & vide Dio [...]is. de eccles. Hierarch. c. 7. part 3. now extant vnder the name of Dionisius Ariopagitta, who is mentioned in the Actes,Act. 17, 34. and those w [...]itings aswellMr. Fulke against the Rhemish Test [...]ment in 2. Thess. 2. sect 19 fol. 361. b. paulo ante med. thinketh that Dionisius liued in the time of Origen. acknowledged by Mr. Fulke to haue bene written aboue 1300. yeares since, (which was long before the obiectedWhere as it is vsually obiected against this booke that if it had bene the writing of Dionisius then Eusebius or Hierome would haue mentioned it, this confessed antiquitie therof before their times, auoideth that obiection, which is also no lesse plainly auoided by Eusebius hist. l. 5. c. 26. and Hierome (in catul. prope initium) who signifie that the bookes of sondry writers were vnknowne to them. times to the contrarie of Eusebius and Hierome) as also alledged specially by Mr. Sutcliffe as being Sutcliffe de Presbiterio c. 13 pag. 91 prope finem saith. Dionisius antiquitatis optimus sane testis, videtur enim esse antiquissimus &c. And the Lord Archbishop of Canterburie in his answere to the admonition pag. 105 sect vlt. alledgeth Dionisius saying, Dionisius Ariopagitta in his booke de caelesti hierarchia & seauenth chapter speaketh thus. &c. And see hereafter in this Section numb. 13 in the margent at this marke (¶) most auncient, and the best witnes of antiquitie.
In like maner concerning Limbus Patrum where as Bellarmine alledgeth in proofe thereof the plaine testimonies of the Greeke Fathers, as namely ofBellarm. tom. 1. l. 4 de Christi Anima cap. 14 Iustine, Ireneus, Clemens, Origen, Eusebius, Basill, Nazianzen, Nicen, Epiphanius, Chrisostome, &c. and of the Lattine FathersBellarm. ibid. Tertulian, Hipolitus Ciprian, Hillarie, Gaudentius, Prudentius, Ambros, Hierome, Rufinus, Austine, Leo, Fulgentius, &c. our aduesarie Dan [...]us answereth to their testimonies saying.Danaeus ad Roberti Bellarmini d [...]put. part. 1 pag. [...]76. paulo post med. as concerning them, they were not inctructed out of Gods word, neither doe th y confirme theire opinion from it, but only from their owne coniectures &c. In like plaine maner doth my Lord of Winchester make his acknowledgement, saying. [Page 15] Master Bilson in his booke of the full redemption of mankind pag. 188 fine. All the Fathers with one consent affirme, that Christ deliuered the soules of the Patriarkes and Prophets out of Hell, at his comming thither, and so spoyled Sathan of those that were in his present possession: where-vnto might be added the like liberall and plaineMr. Whittaker contra Dur [...]um l. 8. p. 567. fine. answereth to Dureus his testimonies from the Fathers concerning Lymbus Patrum saying: quod scripturis euincere minus potuisti, id Patrum Testimonijs procul dubio conficles: de qu [...] bus vt tibi quod fentio libere, breuiterque respondeam, apud me vna scripturae vocula plus habet ponderis, quam mille Patrum sine scripturis pronunciata, itaque non expectabis dum singulati [...] hos Patrum errores diluo. And see further Mr. Whitaker ibid. pag. 773. initio And D. Barlowe in his defence of the articles of the Protestants religion pag. 173 Post med. sayeth hereof. This passeth most rife among the Fathers, who taking Inferi for Abraham [...] bosome, expound it that Christ went thither, ad liberandum liberandos, to conuey the Fathers deceased before his Resurrection into the place where now they are. confession of Mr. Whitaker and Mr. D. Barlowe. In so m [...]ch as Ioannes Lascicius a learned Protestant of Polonia, doubteth not to affirmeIoannes Lascicius in the booke entituled de Russorum, Muscouitorum, & Tartarum Religione. pag. 122 initio & 123 and deriue the Doctrine therof, from manifestSee the testimonie of Ignatius in his epistle ad Trallianos paulo post med. and the like testimonie of Thaddeus apud Euseb. hist. l. 1. cap. vlt. testimonies of Ig [...]atius, Mr. Whitguift in his defence &c. pag. 408 ante med. who was scholler to S. Iohn. as also of Thaddaeus who was one ofMat. 10, 3. the twelue. the authoritie and creditte of which last Testimonie Frigenilleus Frigeuilleus Gauuius in his Palma Christiana pag. 74 post med. Gauuius (an other Protestant writer) vndertaketh specially to defend.
5 Fiftly as concerning f [...]eewill, it is affirmed that ProtestantsSo sayeth the Puritanes in their breefe discouerie of vntruthes &c. conteined in D. Bancrofts sermon pag. 203 fine. knowe that euer since the Apostles time in a manner it florished euery where, vntill Martin Luther tooke the sword in hand against it. And that accordingly the most auncient Fathers, namelyHereof see Abraham Scultetus in medulla theologiae patrum pag. 369 post med. & 304 post med. & 466. fine & 151 paulo ante med. & 105 circa medium & 98 circa med. & 48 prope initium & fine. & 66 fine & 73 initio & 40 ante med. and see the centurie writers cent. 2 c. 4 col. 58 line 30 & col. 59 line 11. & cent. 3 c. 4. col. 77 & 78 & col. 48 line 15.. Ciprian, Theophilus, Tertulian, Origen, Clemens Alexandrinus, Iustine Ireneus, Athenagoras Tatianus: &c. erred therein:
6 Sixtly as concerning freewill & merite of workes Mr. D. Humfrie saith,Humfreid. Iesuitismi pa [...]t. 2 pag. 530 ante med And concerning the confessed doctrine of Me ite, of W [...]rkes in Clemens Alexandrinus, Theophilus, Cypr. Iustine, Martir &c. See Abraham Scult [...]tus vbi supra pag. 48. ante med. & 122 post med. & 151 post med. And the centurie writers cent. 2. c. 4 & cent. 3 c. 4. it may not be denyed but that Iereneus, Cl [...]menes, and oth [...]r [...] (quos vocant Apostolicos) called Apostolicall (in respect of the time in which they liued, haue in their writing [...] the opinions of freewill [...] [Page 16] and of meritt of wookes:
7 Seuenthly concerning freewill, meritts of workes, inuocation of Saints, and such other like: The Lord Archbishope of Canturbury discourcing ofMr. Whitguift in his defence &c. against the reply of Carthwrite pag. 472 fine & 473 initio. Doctrine taught in any age [...]ine the Apostles time: affirmeth without any other exception, either of age or Father, that (to vse his owne wordes)Mr. Whitguifte vbi supra pag. 473 paulo post initium and [...]e Mr. Louel in his examination &c. pag. 120. almost all the Bishopes and learned writers of the Greek [...] Church, and Lattin also f [...]r the moste parte were spotted w [...]h Doctrine of freewill, of merite, of inuocation of Saintes, and such l [...]ke:
8 Eightly concerning Baptisme, that the most auncient Fathers (who suc [...]eeded next to the Apostles schollers) namely Iustine, Cl [...]ment &c. Centur. 2. c. 4. col. 47. line. 43. and in Centur. 3. c. 4. col. 82. line. 55. it is saide: Affirmare audet Ciprianus quod persona Baptizans Spiritum sanctum conferat & Baptizatum intus sanctificet. thought regeneration (not to be signified but) wrought by Baptisme, and the word; vnto which (two) ioyned t gether they attribut efficacie, that is to say remission of sinnes: that alsoCent. 3 cap. 6. col. 125 line 16. Origen, Tertulian, and Cipriane, mencion how that the Baptized persones were accustomed to be signed with the signe of the Crosse. That there were likewise then vsed in Baptisme sundry other Ceremonies ascent. col. 124. line 53 & col. 126 line 20. Abrenunciati [...]: cent. 3. col. 125. line 1 & 124 line 57 Three sould immertio, centur 3. col. 125 line 9. vncton &c. thatSoe saith Carthwrite in Mr. Whitguifts defence &c. p. 522 fine And Bullenger in his decades in English decad 5. serm. 8. pag. 1049. a. circa med. Austine was of minde that Children could not be saued without Baptisme: thatMusculus ho. comun. de Baptismo pag. 308. post med. Austine and many Fathers were of the same opinion. In so much that (as Caluin confesseth) the Fathers hereupon doubted notCaluin. institut. lib. 4 c. 1 sect 20. almost from the very beginning of the Church, to vse the Baptisme of laye persons in daunger of death.
9 Ninthly concering Confe [...]sion, Absolution, Penance and satisfaction: that euencent. 3. cap. 6. col. 127. line 28. and see the wordes alledged hereafter tract. 2. sect 7. in the margent at the letter c. neerest the end in (those firster) times of Ciprian and Tertulian was vsed priuate Confession (euen) of thoughtes and lesser sinnes, and that the same wasvide ibidem then commaunded and thought necessarie that also as then Penance cent. 3. col. 127 line 40 or satisfaction was enioyned according to the offence. that the same FathersWhittaker contra Camp. rat. 5 pag. 78 and see him also alledged in Mr. Fulkes defence of the English transl [...]tions c. 13 pag. 368 ante medium. though by (such) their externall discipline of life, to paie the paines due for sinnes, and to satisfie Gods Iustice. ThatWhitaker in resp. ad. Camp. rat. 5 pag. 78 paulo ante medium. not Ciprian only; but almost all the most holy Fathers of that time were in that error [Page 17] and that the Priest, when Confession was (as before) made, and Penance enioyned,Cent. 3. col. 129. l. 77. did afterwardes absolue the Penitent (euen)Vide ibid. And see this ceremonie of imposing the Preists hand in absolution mentioned by Cyprian in serm. de lapsis paulo ante med. & l. 3. ep 17. & 18 Concil. 4. Carthag. Can. 76. & 78 & Chrisost in Ioh. 20. hom. 85 fine. with the now like vsed Ceremony of imposing his hand.
10 Tenthly concerning the Primacie of Peter, and the Romane sea, our aduersaries reprehend sundry of the Fathers for their af [...]rming the Church to be builded vpon Peter: namelycent. 4 col. 1250 line 2. S. Hierome: cent. 4. col. 555 line 30 Hillary: Cent. 4 col. 558 line 54 Nazianzen: Cent. 3 col 84 line 37 Tertuliā Cent. 4 col. 84 line 59. Ciprian: Cent. 3. col. 85 line 3. Origen: and in generallCaluin. institut. l. 4 c. 6. sect 6 saith. In Petro fundatam esse ecclesiam quia dictum sit, super hanc petram &c. At nonnulli ex Patribus sic exposuerunt, sed recl [...]mat tota scriptura &c. And Daneus in respons. ad Bellarmini disput. part. 1 pag. 277 post med. saith. Patres pessime de Petri persona sunt interpretati &c. many Fathers reprouing also others for their entitling PeterCent. 4 col. 556 line 17. the head of the Apostles: &ibidem col. 1074 l. 16 the Bishope of B [...]sh [...]p [...]s in so m [...]ch that whereas the Fathers doubted not to celebrate publickly a yearely festiuallConcil. 2 Turonense 2 can. 16 saith: sunt etiam qui in festiuitate Cathedr [...] domini Petri Apostoli &c. And Austine serm. 15 de Sanctis saith. Institutio solemnitatis hodiernae, a Senioribus nostris cathedrae nomen accepit, &c. recte ergo ecclesiae, natalem sed [...] illius colunt, quam Apostolus pro ecclesiarum salut suscepit, dicente Domino, tues Petrus &c. ideo digne fundamentum hoc ecclesia colit: and see farther mention hereof in Beda in martirologio. day, in honour of Peters sea (which respect so had the [...]eto, is more then we finde had to any other sea of any o [...]her Apostle:) Daneus answering hereunto [...]ffirmeth the Fathers assertiō, hereof to beDanaeus in resp. ad Bellarmini disput. part. 1 page 375 fine et 276 initio: the iudgements and testimonies of the Church then corrupt d and betwitch [...]d, or made blinde with this error.
As concerning the Primacie of the Romane sea, the Centurists s [...]yCent. 5 cap: 10 col: 1262 line 30. Leo very painefully goeth about to proue that singul [...]r pr [...]heminence was giuen to Peter aboue the other Apostles, and that thence rose the Primacie of the Romane Church: and Beza further saithConfess. Geneue c: 7 sect 12 and Whitaker de concilijs contra Bellarminum pag. 37 paulo ante medium faith, de Leone primo non laboro, magnus ille suit Antichristiani regni architectus, and yet ibidem pag. 34. circa medium he sayeth: of Leo, fuit ille quidem doctus & pius Episcopus, sed fuit tamen magis ambitiosus: &c. it is manifest that Leo in his Epistles doth clearely breathe forth the arrogancie of the Anticristian Romane sea and my Lorde [Page 18] of Canterbury saithMr. Whitguifte in his defence pag. 342 post med. it is certaine that then viz. in the time of the auncient carthage & Aphrican Councell the Bishope of Rome beganne at least to claime the superioritie ouer all Churches. In like manner is that auncient councell of Sardis whereat sundry fathers of the Councell were present, charged for acknowledgingHereof see Osiander cent. 4. p. 294 ante med. and Caluin instit. l. 4 c. 7 sect 9 and see hereafter Tract. 1 sect. 7 in the margent at the letter d of the second alphabet. appell [...]s to the Bishope of Rome and Mr Ful [...]ke and other Protestants affirme that the auncient Romane BishopesSee Mr. Fulke alleaged hereafter Tract. 1 sect 7 letter a of the second alphabet: And see Sparke against Mr. Iohn de Albines in his answere to the preface ante med. and Osiander cent. 5 pag 28 & 218. Anastasius, Innocentius, zozimus, Boniface and Celestinus, (who liued 1200 yeares since) challinged prerogatiue ouer the Bishopes of Aphrica by sorging a false canon of the Nicen Councell which pretence of forgerie is hereafterSee herafter Tract 1 sect 7 in the margent at the letter c. d. of the second alph [...]bet auoided: Mr. Whitaker saith also of Iulius Bish [...]pe of Rome (who liued in Constantines time) thatSee Whitaker de concilijs &c. quoest 2 pag 42 fine 43 initio & 44 paulo ante med. he challenged to him selfe authoritie that no Councell shoulde be celebrated without the sentence of the Bish [...]pe of Rome: S. Cipriane though a Bishope of Aphrick (who liued Anno. 240.) is charged by the centurie writers for his affirmingCent. 3 c. 4 col. 84 line 44. our chaire sounded by our Lords voice vpon the rocke: and thatibid. l. 49 there ought to be one Bishope in the CATHOLICKE Church: & for his challengeibid. l. 56 Peters chaire the principlll Church from whence Priestly vertue ariseth and lastly for his (say they)ibid. line 51. teaching without any foundation of scripture, that the Romane Church ought to be acknowledged of all others, for the Mother and Roote of the Catholi k Church victor Mr. Whitgifte in his defence &c. pag. 510 prope finem. (as my Lord of Canterbury affirmeth) liued Anno 198. and was a Godly Bishope and Martir, and the Church at that time in greate puritie: (as) not being long after the Apostles time: yet is he charged by Amandus Polanus toAmandus Polanus in silogethesin theologiae. p. 165. haue shewed a Papall minde & a [...]r gancie: and by M. SparkeMr. Spark. against mr. Iohn d' Abbines in his answere to the preface ante med. and see Osiander cent. 2. pag [...]7 & 96. somewhat Popel k [...] to haue receaued h [...]s bonndes when he took [...] vpon him to excommunicate the Bishopes of the East Mr. Whitaker also charging him withWhitaker contra Dureum. l. 7. pag. 480. initio exercising iurisdiction vpon former Churches: Lastly S. Ierneus (who liued next after the Apostles schollers and in the same time [Page 19] victor) is disliked for his affirming, thatThe centurie writers. cent. 2. c 4 col. 64 line 10 all the Churche ought to accord to the Romane Church in regard of a more powerable principallitie: wherein the Centurists charge him withSee the 2. centurie in the Alphabeticall table at the word Irenaeus. a corrupt saying concerning the Primacie of the Roman Church:
11 Eleuenthly as concerning the appointed Fast of Lent: St. Ambrose saithAmbrose serm. 25 34. & 36 it is sinne not to faste in Lent: for which M. CarthwrightMr. Cartwrite alleged in master Whitgiftes defence p. 100 initio. reproueth him: & yet no lesse is affirmed byAug de tempore serm. 62 & 77 S. AustineChrisost. ad pop. ho. 6. prope finem. Chrisostome and otherconcil. 8. Tol. can. 9 Fathers: in so much as Chemnitius confesseth thatChemnitius examē Concil. Trident. part 1 pag. 89. b. ante med. saith Quadragessi nam enim Ambrosius, maximus taurinensis, Theophilus, Hieronimus, & alij affirmant ess [...] traditionem apostolicam. Ambrose, Maximus, Taurinensis, Theophilus, Hierom, and other do affirme the faste of Lent to be an Apostolicall tradition. In more vndouted proofe whereof other Protestante writers do not only affirmeSee this in Abraham Scultetus in medul. theologiae Patrum p. 440. initio. The superstition of Lent & fasting, to haue bene allowed and commaunded by Ignatius Master Whitgifte in his defence &c. pag. 408 circa medium who was schol [...]er to S. Iohn: but do also defendSee Abraham Scultetus vbi supra. And the same epistle of Ignasius (being ad Philippenses) is in like manner cited and acknowledged by Mr. Whitgifte in his deffence p. 102 ante med. And by mr. Carthwrite alleaged ibidem. pag. 99 prope finem. And mr. Hooker in his ecclesiasticall policie l. 5. sect. 72 pag. 209 circa med. answereth our aduersaries vsuall obiection made against it. and so likewise doth mr. Whitgifte in his defence. &c. that very Epistle of Ignatius, in which this Doctrine is extant, to be his true Epistle and not counterfaite:
12 Tweluethly concerning vnwritten Traditions and Ceremonies, and first concerninge vnwritten TRADITIONS it is Confessed as followeth, whereas Sanit. CHRISOSTOME saithChrisost. in 2. Thessal. hom. 4 the Apostles did not deliuer all thinges by writing, but many things without, and these be as worthie of credit as the other: Mr. Whitaker in answere thereof saithWhittaker de sacra scriptura. p. 678 paulo post med. I answere that thi [...] is an inconsiderate speech and vnworthie so greate a father and whereas Epiphanius saithEpiphanius haer. 61 circa med. we must vse Tradition for the scriptu [...]e hath not all thinges, and therefore the Apostles deliuered certaine thinges by writinge and certaine by Tradition: with whom agreeth S. Basill sayingBasil. de Spir. Sanct. cap. 27. some [Page 20] thing we haue from scripture other things from the Apostles Tradition &c. both which hath like force vnto Christian Religion: Mr. D. Rainoldes answering to these foresaid sayings of Basill and Chrisostome, saithD. Rainoldes in his Conclusions annexed to his conference the 1. conclusion. pag. 689. I take not vpon me to controule them, but let the Church Iudge if they considered with aduice enough: &c. Whereunto might be added the like confessedWhere Eusebius l. 1 demonstr. Euang. c. 8 is obiected to say, that the Apostles published their doctrine: Partly by writing, partly without writing, as it were by a certaine vnwritten law. Mr. Whittaker de sacra scriptura pag. 668 fine. saith therto. I answere that this testimonie is plaine enough, but in no sorte to be receaued, because it is against the Scriptures. testimonie, from Eusebius.
And thus much breifly concerning the Fathers of the Greeke Church. Now as concerning the like confessed Doctrine in the Fathers of the LATTIN Church (to avoide tediousnes) S. Austine only (as being mostGomarus in speculo verae ecclesiae &c. pag. 96 ante mediu saith: Augustinus Patrum omnium communi sententia purissimus habetur. approued by our aduersaries) shall serue for all: who labouring to proue that those who are Baptized by heretickes shoulde not be Rebaptized, saithAug. de Bap. contra Don. l. 5. c. 23 the Apostles commaunded nothinge hereof, but that custome which was opposed herein against Ciprian is to be beleeued to proceede from their Tradition, as many things be, which the wholle Church houldeth, and are therefore well beleeued to be commaunded of the Apostles, although they bee not written. Wherein andSee the like saying in Austine epist. 118 ad Ianuarium. other his like sayings his meaning is so euident and confessed, that Mr. Carthwright speaking thereof, saythSee Mr. Carthwrite in mr. Whitgifts defence &c. p. 103 ante med. to allowe St. Austines saying is to bring [...] in Poperie againe: and thatSee Mr. Carthwrites wordes alleaged vbi supra. if S. Austines Iudgement be a good Iudgment, then there be some things commaunded of God, which are not in the scriptures, and there-upon no sufficient Doctrine conteined in the scriptures: Add but now hereunto, thatSee Chemnitius examen part. 1. pag. 87. 89 90. Chemnitius, reporteth for their like testimonie of vnwritten Traditions; Clemens Alexandrinus, Origen, Epiphanius, Ambrose, Hierome, Maximus, Theophilus, Basill, Damascene &c. That M. FulkeSee mr. Fulke against Purgatory pa. 362 ante med. & 303 & 397 and against Martiall pag. 170. 178. and against Bristowes motiues p. 35 & 36. also confesseth as much of Chrisostom [...], Tertulian, Ciprian, Augustine, Hierome, &c. that lastly, Mr. WhitakerSee master Whitaker de sacra scriptura pag. 678. 681. 683. 685. 690. 695. 696. 670 668. acknowledgeth the like of Chrisostome, Epiphanius, Tertulian, Ciprian, Augustine, Innocentius, Leo, Basill, Eusebius, Damascene, &c. Now as concerning Ceremonies Mr. Calfehill [Page 21] (to omitte others) affirmeth thatHereof see Mr. Fulkes reioinder to Martialls Replie printed 1580. pa. 131 fine & 132 initio. the Fathers declined all from the simplicitie of the Gospell in ceremonies.
13 Thirtenthly it is confessed yet further in generall concerning Dionisius Artopagitta and Hermes, who are houlden most auncient & Apostolike,Of Dionisius mention is made act. 17, 34. and of Hermes rom. 16, 14. namely that Dionisius in his fore-saide writinges which were aboue a thousand yeares since (as D. HumfrieHumfreid. in Iesuitismi part. 2. rat. 5 pag. 513 fine & 514 initio. saith: Hunc Arcopagitam, Suidas, Michaell Singelus, Gregorius Turonensis, & alij Pauli auditorem credunt fuisse illum scriptorem caelestis et ecclesiasticae Hierarchiae: And see before Sect 3. n. 4. lit. .o. confesseth) publickely extant and alleadged vnder his name, doth (casually and obiter amonge other thinges) make mention ouer and besides the foresaide Doctrine of praier for the dead, Hamelmanus de traditionibus apostolicis col. 707 line 27 & col. 736 line 56 and master Whitaker de sacra scriptura pag. 655 ante med. of Apostolicke vnwritten Traditions: ofHamelmanus vbi supra col. 707. l. 4 & col. 732 l. 51 Chrisme Hamelmanus vbi supra col. 707. l. 49 & col. 743 l. 4 Consecration of Moncks. &Humfreid. in Iesuitismi par 2 pag. 519 circamed [...]nd Luther tom. 2 Witeberg. Anno 1562 de captiu. Babil. fol. 84. b. ante med. Sixe of our Sacraments that the booke of Hermes entituled Pastor affordeth in like manner testimonie or grounde worke ofAbraham Scultetus in medulla theolog. &c. pag. 467 post med. freewill and monasticall solitude ofHamelmanus de trad. apost. col. 252 fine & col. 253 initio. & col. 254 line 38 and Abraham Scultetus vbi supra pag. 467 post med. Pu [...]gatorie, and praier for the dead: ofHamelmanus vbi supra col. 253 l. 54 & col. 254 l. 49 Merite and Iustification of workes: of Professed Chastitie Hamelmanus vbi supra col. 251 line 48 & col. 254 l. 30 in ministers ofHamelmanus vbi supra col. 254 l. 36 Fasting from certaine meates: ofibidem col. 253 line 46 the Innocent parties remainnig vnmaried in case of adultrie: ofChemnitius examen concil. Trident. part. pag. 127 a prope finem workes of superogation: and ofHamelmanus vbi supra col. 254 l. 53 saith. Furtigitur bonum papismi initium impurus ille liber pastoris, vel Heremitis. Poperie: And though in the primatiue Church some questionVide Eusebium hist. l. 3 [...]. 3 prope finem was made of this booke, as whether it were Canonicall scripture or not, (many FathersIt was thought to be sacred, and for such alleaged by Origen lib. 10 in epist. ad Rom. Tertulian l. de oratione. Clemens Alex. l. 6 stromat. Athanasius in libro de decretis Nicen Synod. Cassianus collat. 13. c. 12 and by Ireneus l. 4 c. 37. thinking that it was) yet is it confessed to haue ben receaued at the least forHamelmanus vbi supra col. 254 line 24 saith. illum pro ecclesiastico habuerunt quidem Patr [...]s: and col. 730 line 25 he saith Hermetis libellus qui dicitur Pastor, est olim aliquando in numerum ecclesiasticorum librorum relatus: In so much as Eusebius hist. l. 3 c. 3. Ruffinus in Simbolum & Hierom. in catul. do commēd this booke for profitable, and so Mr. Whitaker de sacra scriptura p. 93 fine confesseth of Hierome. Ecclesiasticall, and the authoritie thereof to haue bene so many ages since specially alleadgedHamelmanus vbi supra col. 253 line 10 saith: Liber pastoris videtur receptus esse ab Ireneo & Clemente. And col. 255 line 42 he saith: Ostendit Eusebius a quibusdam librum pastoris receptum esse, & imprimis ab Ireneo sic & Origines l. 1 de Principijs c. 3 citat quaedam ex libro pastoris eiusque libri lectionem commendat: ho: 13 in Ezech: by Origen, Clement, and Ireneus, who liued next to those Apostles times.
[Page 22]14 Fourthtenthly whereas the Lord Archbishope of Canterburie doth against Carthwright learnedly and truly vrge this generall rule or proofe of Apostolicke Doctrine, sayingMr. Whitgiste in his deffence: &c. pag: 351 for so much as the originall & beginning of these names, Metropolitaine, Archbishop &c. such is their antiquitie, cannot be found so farr as I haue read it is to be supposed they haue their Originall from the Apostl [...]s themselues. For as I remember S. Austine hath this rule in his 118 Epistle. In somuch as he yet further saith in proofe of this ruleMr. Whitgifte vbi supra pag: 352 it is of credit with the writers of our time, namely with Mr. Suinglius Mr. Caluine, & Mr. Gualter, and surely I thinke no learned man doth dissent from them:
It is now by the premisses made more then euident that the seuerall Doctrines of our faith, are according to this rule, no lesse fr [...]e from all noted and knowne beginning since the Apostles times, then are the other foresaide Doctrines of Metropolitaines and Bishopes: a thing so manifest that Master. Carthwright though our greate aduersarie) doubteth not yet further to acknowledge the same, saying therefore of this very rule in plaine wordes,See Mr: Carthwrite his wordes in Mr. Whitgiftes foresaide deffence &c. pag: 352 initio: that thereby a windowe is open to bring in all Popery: AndMaster Carthwright alleaged ibidem pag: 103 paulo ante medium. I appeall (saith he) to the Iudgement of all men, if this be not to bringe in Poperie againe, to allowe of S. Austines saying: &. So euidently do our owne learned aduersaries, confirme and proue our foresaide Catholicke Religion, wherto we were so manie ages since conuerted, to be vndoubtedly Apostolicke.
ANOTHER LIKE DEMONSTRATION thereof by Testimonie from the Auncient Iewes. §. 4.
ADD but now in further demonstration hereof that concerning such Articles of faith now in question as are cōmon to vs with the Fathers of the olde Testament whensoeuer vpon any occasion, direct mencion is made of any of them either by those that were before Christs time, or by the Iewish Rabines since, it is still with vs and against our aduersaries. So in the example of praier for the dead, admitting the booke of Machabees but for a true Historie, it may not be denied but that long before Christs time, Iudas Machabeus (the vndoubted seruant of god2. Machab. 2, 43 procured sacrifice for the dead: that the Priestes at Hierusalem accordingly offred2 Machab. 2, 45 So he made a reconciliation for the dead that they might be deliuered from sinne. it, and that the Author of the Historie so many yeares after commended2. Machab. 2, 45. It was a holy & good thought, & vide ibidem: verse: 43 the same. Whereunto might be added further like Testimonie thereof, from IosephusIoseph cap: 9 diswadeth those distressed souldiers that were ready to kill thē selues saying: ignoro milites quae sit propitiatio animae hominis qui seipsum interfecit: quis intercedet pro nobis ad Deum si sic peccauerimus? most plainely therby insinuating that for such as dye in better estate, Praier may be made. Bengorion, also from Rabby SimeonRabby Symeon in libro Zoar. in c. 18 Genesis, saith of such as are temporally punished after this life. After they are purged from the filth of theire sinnes, then doth God cause them to ascend out of that place. (who liued bef [...]re Christ) & from sundry other olde IewishMenachim siam in Comment. ad Leuit. c 16 and R. Hismi. Alphesi [...] scholiastes ad caput Roch: Haschana. And R. Isaac. Ababab. in Lucerna lucis conclusione. 1. part. 2. c. 2. & R. Dauid. Kimhi in Psalm: 32. Rabbines. In so much as the Iewish Rabbines of latter age do therevpon yet to this day professefull to retaine and obserueRabby Moyses in his simbolum fidei Iudeorum printed at Paris Anno 1569. fol. 26. b & 27 a & 22 b expr [...]ss [...]th a prescript forme of praier for the dead. like testimonie therof is giuen by Ioannes Isaac in institutionibus linguae haebricae impressis Coloniae. 1553 And by Antonius Margarita: (a late conuerted Iewe) in his booke entituled vniuersi Iudaeorum fides: Praier for the dead: a thing not denied but plainelie confessed by Mr.Whitaker contra Dureum lib. 1 pag. 85 antemed. saith: Scio enim Iudae is esse libros memoriales quos in Sinagogis suis legunt, eosque nunc precibus quibusdam pro mortuis vti solere non ignoro. Whitaker.
[Page 24]2 Secondlye concerning Limbus Patrum the booke entituled Ecclesiasticus, though we should for the time suppose it not to be Canonicall Scripture, yet was it Collected or penned before Christs time, and by such an Author as then beforeIn the prologue of the booke of ecclesiasticus ante med. had giuen him selfe to the reading of the Lawe and the Prophets and other b [...]okes of their Fathers and had gotten therein sufficient knowledge. In this booke is our Sauiours discending in to that place specially foretoulde vs where it is said in his person:Ecclesiasticus 24, 37. I will pearce through the lower partes of the earth, I will looke vpon all such as bee a sleepe, and will lighten all them that trust in the Lord: a saying so directThis pearcing thing the lower partes of the earth to lighten those that were there a sleepe and tr [...]sted in the Lord argueth plainely that those faithfull so a sleepe (or dead) were not thē in Heauen: for by the lower partes of the e [...]th cannot be ment heauen. and pertinent that Master VVHITAKER seeketh to euade by these two only waies, as first in answering thatWhitaker contra Dureum l. 8 pag. 567 postmed. these wordes are wanting in the Greeke Coppie: Se [...]ondly (this being notoriously false [...]alse for the English Bible (to omit others) of Anno 1576 purporting by the title on the first page thereof to bee translated according to the H [...]brue and Greeke hath these wordes translated accordingly. he finally and only reposeth him selfe in answeringe thatWhitaker contra Dureum l. 8 pag. 567 post med. saith, Nec libri huius authoritatē canonicam agnosco, his fundamentis limbum immixum reuera est necesse. the booke is not Canonicall and so acknowledging the plaine meaning of the wordes, reiecteth their authoritie: So euidently doth this author make with the Doct [...]ine of Limbus Patrum. In like maner Rabbenu [...] Haccados who liued before Christ, saith in the person of the MessiasRabbenus Haccados libro qui inscribitur: Reuelator Arcanorum. I haue decreed to discend into Hell to redeeme the soules of the iust which my Father did thrust there in the rodd of [...] s indignation, for Adams sinne: and the same doctrine is more plainly as yet affirmed [Page 25] by RabbyRabby Symeon filius Iohai apud Rabbenum Heccados foretelleth of the Messias saying: Tunc anima eius discendet ad inferos, apud quos triduo morabitur, vt inde omnes animas Patrum iustorumque educat. &c. iuxta illud Hoseae 6. visitabit nos post duos dies, in die tertia suscitabit nos, & viuemus ante faciem eius. Symeon (who liued before Christs comming) and by otherSee these more at large alleaged by Petrus Galatinus de arcanis Catholicae veritatis l. 6 c. 9 & 10. See them also alleaged by Peter Martir in his common places part. 3. cap. 16 sect 13 pag. 377 a. fine & b. Iewish Rabbines, and it is further more so agreeable with the writings of theIt is said that the law brought nothinge to perfection but was onely an introduction of a better hope: hebr. 7, 19) that therefore the way of holies was not open whiles the sister Tabernacle was standing. hebr. 9, 8 the same way being therefore called the new way which Christ dedicated (hebr. 10, 20.) that the Fathers of the olde testament are saide to dye according to faith not receauing the promise. hebr. 11, 13. God prouiding a better thing for vs, that they with out vs should not be made perfect. ibidem verse vlt. that accordingly the soules of sondry persons dead before our Sauiours Ascention, as of Lazarus: Ioan. 11, 43, 44. the made Luc 8, 55. and of those many bodies of the Saintes that rose and appeared to many. Mathew 27, 52, 53. did not returne from the eternall and vnchangeable ioies of heauen, but from that other place which is called Abrahams bosome (Luc. 16, 22 the which was not heauen, as is testified by Peter Martir in his cōmon places part. 2 pag. 621. a & part. 3. pag. 378. b & 379 a. initio: that (lastly) our Sauiour in regard of his deliuery of the olde Patriarkes & iust men from this place at the time of his ascention, is accordingly said to Ascend on high leading captiuitie captiue: (Ephes. 4, 8.) new Testament, that the auncientSee heretofore sect 3. subdiuision 4. Fathers and sondry learnedSee hereafter tract. 3. sect. 7 in the margent vnder the letter .m. example 17 pag. 174 fine: and see Peter Martir vbi supra. Protestants do therefore allow of it.
3 Thirdly as concerning Freewill it is saide in the foresaide booke of Ecclesiasticus not only of Adam who was then dead, and his sinne past, but by way of admonition to the men of that time, and against their sinnes then to come:Ecclesiasticus 15, 12, 15, 16, 17. say not thou he hath caused me to erre, if thou wilt, thou shalt obserue the Commaundements, h [...] hath set water and fire before thee, strech out thy hand to which thou wilt. Before man is life and death, good and euill, what liketh him, shall be giuen him, a saying so plaine, that Mr. VVhitaker therefore saith thereof de loco Ecclesiastici Patrum, laboro &c.Whitaker in respons. ad rationes Campiani rat. 1. pag. 15 ante med. I make smalle account of the place of Ecclesiasticus, neither will I be leeue the freedome of mans will although he should affirme a hundreth times, that before man were life and death: and aun [...]ient Philo who liued in Christs time, affirmeth in like maner thatPhilo. in libro quod Deus sit immutabilis. man hath freewill &c. to which purpose (saith he) is extant the Oracle in Deutronomie, I haue placed before the l [...]fe and death, good and euill, choose life: whereunto might be added no lesse plaine sayings of the other olde IewisheRabby Moyses filius Maimon in epistola aduersus astrologos, saith: Ac illud quidem intelligere debetis, praecipuum ac principale ex fundamentis legis nostrae omnesque item Philosophos aperte confiteri, quecunque ab ipsis hominibus fiunt, ea in ipsorum manu esse ac potestate &c. Si velit homo seruit Domino &c. sin placet adire concilia impiorum, & illud quoque facit: And see the other no lesse plaine sayings of Rabby Moyses Hadarsan in cap. 4. Gen. and also of Rabby Abba and Rabby Selomo, alleaged by Petrrus Galatinus de arcanis Catholicae veritatis: Printed Francofuf. 1602. l. 6 c. 6. colum. 339. f. & 340. b. c. Rabbines, and the answereableMr. Fulke in his defence of the English translatiōs &c. p. 320 initio, saith: The Iewish Rabbines Patrons of freewill, do erre &c. And wheras Rabby Akiba in capitulis Patrum, saieth: Et potestas data est & in bono mundus iudicatur Paulus Fagius in hunc locum saith: Haebrei hanc sentē tiam sic explicant &c. vt cuiuis homini potestas tradita sit vel bene vel male agendi. And againe. Apotheca aperta est &c. Hoc referunt ad liberum arbitrium videlicet in nobis situm, vt vel male vel bene agamus, Deum nobis mortem aut vitam pro ponere. confession in that be halfe of Mr. [Page 26] D. Fulke and Paulus Fagius.
4 Fourthly as concerning Gods induration or hardening of Pharos hart: the Iewishe Rabbines are so plaine in affirming with vs the same to bee by Gods Permission, and not by his working (which expositionCalum institut. l. 2. c. 4 sect. 3. in [...]o Caluine disliketh in the auncient Fathers) that Peter MartirPeter Martir in epist. ad Rom. c. 9. and MunsterM [...]nster: Annot. in Exod. c. 7 doe accordingly acknowledge this their aforesaide exposition.
5 Fiftly as concerning Angells and Saintes, the booke of Toby written so many ages before Christ, is soToby. 5, 5.12, 12.13, 15.18. plaine with vs concerning the patronage and intercession of Angells, that Mr. Whitaker doth therefore accordingly confesse and say thereof,Whittaker in respons. ad rationes. Campiani rat. 1. pag. 15. ante medi. illum vero Tobiae Raphaelem &c. Little doe we regard the example of Raphaell the Angell mentioned in Toby. Ne [...] ther doe we acknowledge those Of the like number of seauen Angels which Mr. Whitaker so misliketh: see reuelat. 1, 4. & 5, 6. seuen Ang [...]l [...] whereof he speaketh, all this is different from the Canonicall Scriptures, and sauoreth I know not of what superstition: In like maner doth the booke of Machabees make mention how that Iudas Mach [...]beus2. Machab. 15, 12, 13, 14. sawe in vision Onias the highe Preiste (who was then before sl [...]ine)See 2. Machab. 3, 33 & 4, 34 houlding vp his hand [...]s towards heauen and praying for the People, after which there appeared to him an other man who was ag [...]d &c. And Onias spake and said, this is a louer of the Brethren who Prayeth much for the People, and for the whole Cittie, (to witt) Ieremias the Prophet of God: A place so directe for the intercession of Saints, that Mr. Whitaker doth therfore contemne itWhitaker in respons. ad rationes Campiani pag. 16. circa medium, saith: Illud Iudae de Oum somnium quod. 2. Machabe. 15. legimus, vt somnium pretermitto, sed parum refert mortuorum siue intercessionem siue sacrificium intelligas, vtrumque tuum est, vtrumque est falsum. And it is to be obserued f [...]rther as very probable, that the Iewes present at our Sauiours Death, coulde not haue bene so easesly perswaded to thinke & say that our Sauiour sayingMat. 27, 46, 47, 49. & Marc. 15, 34, 35, 36. Eli Eli Lammasabacthani, called He ias: If the inuocation of [Page 27] Saintes had not bene as then familiar and vsuall to them: which their opinion appeareth yet more euidently, aswell by further testimonie of the auncientSee Flauius Iosephus de Bello Iudaico l. 3. c. 14 where it is said: Purae animae quae exaudiunt inuocantes, retinent locum in coelo adeptae sanctissi nū: And Iosephus Bengorion in Bello Iudaico. cap. 21 where it is said: Exurge nunc Moises fili Amram & vide populū tuum. exurge nunc Aaron &c. and R. Abr ham in Gen. 22: saith of the Iewes. Isaac interponere solent interse & Deum in suis precibus quasi intercessorem. Iewes, as also of those other Rabbines of latterConcerning the like practise of the latter Iewes, see simbolum fidei Iudaeorum impress. Prarisijs 1569. fol. 22. b & 28. b And in their office of the dead, (where it is said) Angeli pacis egredimini in occur [...]um defuncti, portas Paradisi voluptatis reserate illi: & in libro precationum Iudaicarum it is said: Angeli misericordes ministri Dei altissimi placate quaeso faciem Dei optima deprecatione &c. times.
6 Sixtly concerning the vnwritten Traditions of the Iewes.Origen hom. 5 in numer. & in ep ad Rom. c. 3. Origen and HillaryHillarie in Psal. 2. saith: Erat iam a Mose antea institutum in omni Synagoga septuaginta esse Doctores: nam idem Moyses quamuis veteris Testamenti verba in literis condidisset, tamen separatum quaedam ex occultis legis secretiora misteria septuaginta senioribus, qui Doctores deinceps manerent, intimauerat. &c. doctrina ergo horum in posterum, quae ab ipso scriptore legis accepta, in hoc seniorum & numero, & officio conseruata est. do affirme that Moyses left many things vnwritten, the knowledge whereof was continued by Tradition, which his vnwritten Traditions: the booke of Esdras doth not obscurely signifie, as where it is said in the person of God, touching Moyses4. Esdras. 14, 4, 6, 26. I brought him to the mount Sinay, I did detaine him with me many daies &c. I commaunded him saying th s [...] wordes thou shalt make knowne, & these keepe secret. And Egesippus mencioneth in like maner (as Mr. Hanmer Translateth EusebiusEgesippus apud Eusebium hist. l. 4 c. 21 fine. the vnwritten Traditions of the Iewes. To which their vnwrittē Traditions that most auncient Author AnatoliusAnatolius apud Eusebium hist. l. 7. c. 26 giueth also further Testimonie, & the auncient Iewes do affirme of their vnwritten Lawe, thatIn capitulis Patrum. Moyses receau [...]d it vp [...]n Mount Sinay and deliuered it to Iosua, & Iosua to the Elders &c. which saying as Rabby Iudas affirmethR. Iudas in hunc locum. concerneth the order of Tradition deliuered by word of mouth: a thinge not denied but confessed byPaulus Fagius in hunc locum saith: Tenet enim Iudeoru opinio, Mosen duplicē legem a Domino in monte Synai accepisse, al teram quam legem inscripto siue scripto traditam vocant, alteram quam legem quae in ore est siue ore traditam nominant at (que) hanc postremam succedanto quodam ordine per Mosen ad posteros derinatam affirmant. Paulus Fagius.
7 Seuenthly concerninge the force or meritte of Almes, and other good workes, proceeding from [Page 28] true faith in the Mesias the Doctrine of the auncient Iewes is deliuered in the booke of Toby, where it is said:Toby 12, 9 after the translatiō of the English Bible of 1576. & according to the greeke copie published by the diuines of Basill 1550: the which I doe more precisely note, for that Mr. Fulke against the Rhemish Testament fol. 109 a. circa med. denieth the latter parte of this text to be in the greeke. Almes doth del [...]uer from death, & doth purge all sinne: and againeToby. 4, 10. Almes doth deliuer from death. & suffereth not (the soule) to goe into da [...]knes: and in the foresaide booke of EcclesiasticusEcclesiasticus. 3, 33. water quencheth burning fire and Almes expiateth (or purgeth) sinne: and this is but agreeable with the other Scriptures acknowledged for Canonicall, as where it is saideDaniel 4, 24. Wheras our aduersaries doe here insteed of Redeeme translate breake of. Hemnigeus in his exposition of the 84 psal. Englis [...]ed pag. 527. thinketh that the haebru word signifieth to Redeeme: so also most cleerelye in the gre [...]ke translation doth the greeke word and so likewise doth the vulgar interpreter, & the auncient F [...]thers read accordin [...]ly, in so much as the same reading is obserued likewise by Luther in loc. comun. class. 1. pag. 72. ante medium: and by Peter Martir in his common places in English: part. 3. cap. 4. pag. 114. b. circa med. by Melancthon in loc. con [...]un. edit. 1536. cap. de bonis op [...]ribus pag. 157 in fine: by the Apology of the Confession of Augus [...]a fol. 104. a circa med. And by the T [...]gurine translation of 1544 whereunto might be added the like reading and iudgement of Caluine, Aretius, Bullenger and many other Protestants. redeeme thy sinne with almes, and thy iniquities with mercie to the poore: Prouerb. 16, 6. By mercy and truth sinne sha [...]l be forg [...]uen Prouerb. 15, 27. although this be omitted in the English Bible of 1576 yet is it so euidently parcell of the text that (to omitt the Fathers) the Diuines of B [...]sill in their edition hereof in Greeke and Lattin printed. 1550. do reade it accordinglie. By almes and saith sinnes are purged: Luc. 11, 41. Giue almes and behoulde all thi [...]ge are cleane to you.
8 Eightly concerning Monasticall [...]ife that it was not altogither wanting, but in some sorte professed amonge the auncient Iewes, Iosephus testi [...]eth sayingIosephus antiquit [...]tum: Iudaicarum. l. 18. cap. 2. the righteousnes of the essenes is maruailous: &c. they enioy their riches in Cōmon: &c. And in this course aboue. 4. thousand men doe liue, hauing neither wiues nor seruantes: &c. And else where it is affirmed of them thatIosephus de Bello Iudaico l. 2. c. 7. they are Iewes by nation, and doe obs rue continencie, auoide Mariage, are contemners of riches (and) enioy things in common, none being ritcher then other: And that before any be admitted amongst themIbidem. Triall [Page 29] is had of his Continencie, and his other manners are for two yeares pr [...]ued, and then he is taken into the Company. And Philo also who liued in the Apostles times, maketh mention of those who thenPhilo de vita contemplatiu [...]. forsaking their goodes did dwell without the walles louing solitarine [...]: he also maketh like mention ofPhilo, ibidem. their Monasteries, where being solitarie, they studied the Misteries of holy life, and ofSee Philo his wordes apud Eusebium hist. l. 2. c. 16. post med where it is saide of them, quidam po [...]ro &c. vix semel toto triduo cibi recordantur: (& againe) nonnulli illec ebris sapientiae &c. sic oblectantur &c. vt duplo plus temporis inedi [...]m facile sustineant & vix tantum sex diebus expletis alimentum necessarium degustent: their (wonderfull greate) fasting from meate: Which foresaide professors of monasticall life thus mencioned by Philo, are by the CenturieCentur. 1. l. 2. c. 3. col. 18. line 33. writers, and D. RainoldsD. Rainoldes in his Conference pag. 488. prope finē. (for theire lesserTo their lesser disaduātage, least other wise being taken for Christian professors (as they are by Eusebius hist. l. 2. c. 16. and by Hierom de scriptor. Eccle. verbo Philo) it should argue monasticall profession to be apostolicke. disaduantage) acknowledged to be Iewishe.
9 Ninthly concerning Vowes: it is saide in the writings of the olde Testament.Psal. 76, 11. Vowe yee, and render your vowes vnto God: Numeri. 30, 3. whos [...]euer voweth a vowe vnto the Lord, &c. He shall not breake his promise, but shall do according to all which proceedeth from his mouh. Deutro. 23, 21. when thou shalt vowe a vowe vnto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not be slacke to paye it, for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee: Ecclesiastes 5, 3, When thou hast vowed a vowe vnto God deferre not to paie it: &c: It is better that thou shouldest not vowe then that thou shouldest vowe and not paie it: Whereunto might be added sondry otherPsal. 22, 25. & psal. 50, 14. & Esay. 19, 21. like Testimonies from the writings of the olde Testament. We are not ignorant how that Peter Martir, Mr. D. Fulke, and others seeke to euade in answering thereto, thatPeter Martir de caelibatu & votis pag. 302. fine & 303. and ibidem pag. 304. post med. He further saith. Votū ego caeremoniale antiquae legis praeceptum fuisse affirmo. And Mr. Fulke. answering to psal. 76, 11. saith That text pertaineth to the olde Testament in his retentiue against Bristowes Moiues. &c. pag. 153. fine. And Bullinger in his decades in English, pag. 380. ante med. saith vowes belong to the Iewsh Ceremonies. v [...]wes were Ceremonies of the olde Testament: &c. Abol [...]shed by Christs commi [...]g But is not the contrarie manie waies euident? as .1. First in that vowes were made before Moyses time, as is to be seene in the example ofGen. 28, 20 [...] Then Iacob vowed a vowe saying, &c. Iac [...]s v [...]we. 12. Se [...]ond [...]y by the heretoforeSe heretofore. tract. 1. sect. 3. initio. confessed Doctrine of the most auncient Fathers, teaching vowes. 3. Thirdly, (to omitte the sundry other proofes that might bee alleadged from the new Testament) by the euident confession of sundry learnedMr. Perkens in his re [...]ormed Catholicke, pag. 155. post, med. saith. And now in the new testament we haue warrant in like maner to vowe &c. of this kinde are the vowes to keepe set times of fasting &c. And see the the like lawfulnes of Christian vowes. further affirmed by Musculus in loc. comun. de votis. p. 524. circa med. And by Mr. Willet in his Sinopsis. pa. 241. post med. And by Amandus Pol [...]nus in partitionihus theolog. l. 2. pag. 394. and Danaeus in primae partis altera parte contra Bellarminum pag. 987. affirmeth it, fas esse Christianis Hominibus vouere quae cum dei volūtate consentiunt: Protestants who a knowledg the lawfullnes of Christian vowes: in so much as Mr. [Page 30] Hooker acknowledgethMr. Hooker in his Ecclesiasticall policie. l. 2. pag. 103. paulo post med. Ananias his solemne vowe vnto God, which strictly bound him to the giuing of his possessions to the Churches vs [...], (though vet Mr. Fulke and Mr. Willet will notMr. Willet in his Sinopsis pag. 245. ante med. saith VVe do not reade that ANANIAS made any Vowe &c. And Mr. Fulke against the Remish Testament: in act. 5. fol. 191. a. propt finem. affirmeth the like. in any case acknowledge Ananias to haue vo [...]ed) and Augustine Marloret acknowledgeth in like maner how thatAnd so doth Peter Martir de caelibatu & votis pag. 323. initio. Marloret in. 1. Tim. cap. 5. vers. 11. pag. 375. a fine: the widdowes) men [...]ioned by S. Paule,) did giue their faith to Christ the spouse, and to the Church, willingl [...] barring them s [...]lues from Mariag [...]: with whome herein do agree, sundry otherThe Protestant author of the booke entituled Antichristus siue Prognostica finis mundi. pa. 148. fine. & 149. saith quod Lutherus hanc primam fidem de fide iustificante intelligit & non de fide pudicitiae, id plane coactum est &c. loquitur apostolus de fide seu voto officij &c. quia autem Paulus vitio vertit quod nubere postea voluerint, clarissi num est hanc conditionem in voto intercessisse &c. And Mr. R. Alison in his confutation of Brownisme. pag. 71. affirmeth likewise of these widdowes, that before God and his Church they had vowed not to marrie: And thus (saith he) is this place expounded, by Bullenger, Claudius, Guiniam and others. Protestant writers affirming the vowed Chastitie of the saide widdowes.
10 Tenthly as concerning our con [...]ession of sinnes PetrusGalatinus de arcanis Catholicae veritatis l. 10. cap. 3. Galatinus giueth examples of seuerall testimoniesIn libro Sanhedrin Hierosolomitano in capite quod nigmar haddin id est definitum est iudicium it is said. Omnis cōfitens habet partem in seculo futuro sic enim in Achan reperimus quod dixit ei Ieho [...]uas, fil [...]m [...]da obsecro honorem Domino Deo Israel, & da confessionem, & indica mihi quaeso quid feceris nec celes a me &c. And in libro Ioma id est dierum in capite tom [...]a [...]ppurim id est dies propitiationum. It is said, dixit R. Hurma omnis qui transgressione transgressus est, necesse est vt singulatim exprimat peccatum. &c. in the auncient Iewes, and like further testimonie or prefiguration thereof is not wanting in Leuiticus for whereas seuerall sacrifices are there apointed for seuerall sinnes, as forLeuit. 4, 2, 3. &c. sinne through ignorance, and otherLeuit. 5, 1, 4, 17. & 6, 1, 5. & numeri 5, 7. perticular offences, for whichLeuit. 4, 3. the Priest was appointed to offer and make Leuit. 4, 20. & 5, 6, 13. & 6, 7. a [...]onement, how coulde the Priest heere offer those sundry sacrifices appointed seuerally according to the diuersitie of SINNES, vnlesse the partie so offending confessed the same sinnes to him; which to haue bene so, is yet furthermore probable, in that it [Page 31] was there also appointed and saideLeuit. 5, 6. and numer 5, 7. when hee hath sinned in any of th [...]s [...] thinges, then h [...]e sha [...]l confesse that he hath sinned therein & [...]: And the Preist shall make attonement for him c [...]ncerning his sinne.
11 Eleuenthly as concerning Melchisadechs offering of B [...]ead and Wine in sacrifice (which our aduersariesMaster Fulke against the Remish Testament in haebr. 7. sect. 8. fol. 406. a. initio saith Melchisadechs Bread and VVine pertended not to his Priestly office neither did he offer it to God. And Mr. Willet in his Sinopsis. pa. 478. ante med. & versus finem affirmeth the like; And Mr. Whitakes in his answere to Mr. Rainolds &c. pa. 67. saith, Melchisade [...]he did not by any thing wherein he so sacrificed, pr [...] figure the sacrifice & Priesthood of Christ: deny) and the prefiguration thereby, of our nowe sacrifice of the new Testament. Rabby Samuell saithRabby Samuell in Bereschit Rabba ad cap. 14. Genes. Melchisadech set forth the acts of Preisthood, for he sacrificed Bread and Wine, to the holy and Blessed God. Rabby Phinces saith,Rabby Phinces ibidem in cap. 28. numer. In the time of the Messias all s [...]rifices shall ceasse, but the sa [...]rifice of Bread and Wine shall not ceasse &c. as it is saide Psal. 110. thou art a Preist fore [...]r acco [...]ding to the order of M [...]lchisdech. Rabby Moyses Hadarsan saith of Melchisadech,Rabby Moyses Hadarsan in Bereschit Rabba ad cap. 14. Genes. bringing forth bread & wine, sheweth that he taught the acte of Priesthood, which was to sacrifice Bread and Wine, and this is that which is read in the Psalmes &c. thou art a Priest for euer according to the order of Melchisadich: This point is so euident in the olde Iewish Rabbines: that TheodorusThe [...]dorus Bibliander de SS. Trinitate l. 2. pag. 89. saith, erat apud veteres haebraeos dogma receptissimum in aduentu Messiae Benedicti, cessatura esse omnia legalia sacrificia, tantumque celebrandum sacrificium thoda gratiarum actionis &c. & illud peragendum pane et vino sicut Melchisadech Rex Salem & sacerdos &c. panem et vinum protulit Bibliander (a Protestant writer) doubteth not accordingly to confesse the same.
12 Tweluethly as concerning their further opinion of the Churches sacrifice vpon the comming of the Messias: our now sacrifice is therein so plainely signified and affirmed by the auncient Iewes who liued before Christs time, that (as Galatinus saith of one of them)Galatinus de Arcanus Catholicae veritatis l. 1. cap. 3. circa med. they may be thought not so much to haue foretoulde things to come, as to haue reported Euangelist-like thinges alreadie done: To this end saith Rabby CahanaRabby Cahana ad c. 49. genes. vers. 11. the sacrifice which shalbe offered of Wine, shall not only be chaunged into the substance of the Blood of the Messias, but also into the substance of his Body: the sacrifice which shalbe of Bread notwithstanding that it be whit as milke, it shall be conuerted into the substance of the Body of the M [...]ssias. In like maner Rabby Iudaes saithR. Iudas in 25. exod. the bread shall be changed when it shall be sacrificed from the substance of bread into the [Page 32] substance of the Body of the Messias, which shall discend from Heauen, and he him selfe shall be the sacrifice &c. R [...]bby Symeon saithR. Symeon filius Iohn libro qui inscribitur reu [...]latio secretorum. The sacrifice which after the Messias his comming Priests shall make &c: they shall make it of Bread and Wine &c. and that sacrifice which shall b [...] s [...] celebrated vpon euery Aultar, shall be turned into the Body of the M ssias: Rabby Barachias teacheth that at the comming of theR. Barachias in ecclesiasten. M [...]ssias, foode shall come from Heauen like a little Cak [...]. Thus did these religious and auncient Iewes who liued before CHRISTS comming, foretell and write (by speciall inst nct) concerning our Chur [...]hes Blessed Sacrifice: whereto might be added sundry of their other no lesse plaine testimoniesRabby Ionathas in libro collectionum in psal. 72. saith ille est M [...]ssi [...]s de quo loquitur totus psalmus, cum ergo ait, et erit placenta frumenti in terra in capite montiū, vult dicere quod placenta panis fiet sacrificium in capitibus sacerdotū qui sunt in ecclesia. And Rabby Moyses Hadarsan in psal. 136. saith, Gustate & videte quomā bonus est deus, quia panis quem dat omnibus, ipse est caro eius, et dum gustatur panis, conuertitur in carnem &c. [...]he whi [...]h togither with these are collected specially by PetrusSee these foresaide testimonies and sondry other like alleadged from the Rabbines by Petrus Galatinus de Arcanis Catholicae veritatis. l. 10. ca. 5. 6. & 7. Galatinus, and by Mr. WhitakerFor whereas Duraeus vrgeth this collection made by Galatinus of the Hebrues foresaide so plaine sayings cō cerning Reall Presence & Sacrifice. Mr. Whitaker answering thereunto (l. 9. co [...]tra Duraeum pag. 818 circa med.) Neither confesseth nor yet denieth but shufleth them of, saying only thereto. Tuum in hac causa petrū Galatinū minime profecto desideramus, nec H [...]braeorū Testimonijs illis indigamus. And is this a direct & sufficiēt answere, to so many pl [...]ine sayings of the olde Hebrues that liued before Christ, so euidētly foreshewing & affirming the Reall Presence & sacrifice of Christs Blessed Body in the holy Sacrament? rather sh [...]ffled of then answered,) wherein they do no lesse plainely fore shewe the truth of Christs Body Really present and offered in the Blessed Sacrament, then d d the Heathen Sibills in like maner foretell the truth of his incarnation. And for so much asEsaye 41, 23. God only knoweth thinges to come. The Diuell not being able to foretell things s [...]mplie future, but only such other future effects as depend vpon their seconda [...]y causes then already past or present, in which causes, he (of his greate skill and experience) foreseeth the comming of the said effects, to which kinde, the foresaide Doctrines of Re ll Presence and Sacrifice, cannot in any so [...]te be reduced, by reason they cannot be saide to h [...]ue bene then depending vpon any naturall or other cause, then past or in being, saue only the imediate & sacred will of God. This therefore so pl [...]ine foresaide p [...]ediction m [...]de by the auncient Rabbines before Christs t [...]me, in behalfe of [Page 33] Reall Presence and Sacrifice, demonstrating it selfe so euidently to haue proceeded not from any secondarie cause but only from a diuine instinct, yeeldeth thereby a most strong argument in behalfe of the saide Doctrines.
13 Thirtenthly and lastly (to omitte other pointes) as concerning the finall ending of controuersies, not only scripture, but a certaine visible and liuely Iudge vpon earth was appointed and acknowledged. To omitt all other proofe thereof, the Lawe of Deutronomie was that when there didDeutron. 17, 8, 9, 11. arise any matter to hard for the (people) in Iudgment: they were appointed to goe vp to the place which God had ch [...]sen, and to come to the leuiticall Pri [...]st, and to the Iudge in those daies: and to aske of them the sentence of Iu [...]gement, and to do according to [...]he Iudgment which they did tell, not declining neith [...]r to the r [...]g [...]t hand nor to the lefte, it being yet further saide of him that didDeutron. 17, 12. presumptiously refuse to obay the commaundement of the Priest, tha [...] by the decree of [...]he Iudge that man should di [...]: Now that the sentence grounded vpon this Lawe, was not subi [...]ct to new question vnder colour of appeal ng to the scriptures but was definitiue and finall, and concerned aswell Ecclesiasticall as Ciuill Causes is in it se [...]fe plaine, and for suchDoct. Rainolds in his conferēce pa. 251. circa med. saith, The lawe of Deutronomie was made to establish a highest Court of Iudgement, in which all harder causes Ecclesiasticall & Ciuill should be determined without appeall further: and Mr. Whitaker de sacra scriptura p. 466. prope finem. saith: Respondeo verba ista intelligenda esse &c. de authoritate tantum definiendi difficiles lites ac cō trouersias, siue ecclesiasticas, illas quidem per ministrum, siue politicas et foreses per magistratum, vt esset semper in vtrisque aliquis, a quo prouocare non liceat alioqum enim nullus esset litigandi finis: & vide ibidem pag. 470. paulo post med. And Mr. Bil [...]on in his perpetuall gouerment of Christes Church. pag. 20. post med. saith, hereof that the same did conscerne such matters as were of greatest momēt both Ciuill and sacred, and their sentence by Gods law no man might refuse without punishment of death: And see the like assertion in Mr. Hooker in his preface before his bookes of e [...]clesi [...]sticall policie pa. 26. fine. & 27. & 28. fine. confessed by Mr. D. Rainolds, Mr. D. Whitaker, Mr. D. Bilson, and Mr. Hooker Where-vpon it is euident that not only scripture (which they of the olde Testament had as well as we now haue) but besides that a certaine visible Iudge, was then appointed to determin cōtrouersies. And for so much as the occasion to haue controuersies ended, is as greate now as during the olde Testament, the doubts of religion being as now many moe and the daunger of error no lesse greuous: whether theref [...]re may it be thought that ourHaeor. 8, 6. Testament which is established in better promisses is want [...]ng of this priuiledge? and so therby the Ecclesiasticall policie of Moyses time, to be [Page 34] preferred herein before that other which succeeded by Christ? With which only laste reason the Puritanes doubt not toPenrie in his supplication to the high Courte of Parliament. p. 21. fine. saith That forme of gouerment which maketh our Sauiour Christ Inferior vnto Moyses is an impious, vngodly & vnlawfull gouerment contrarie to the word &c. See him further p. 22. & 23. & peruse the occasion and circumstance of this his reason, and it will appeare to houlde much more stronge in this point then in that other for which he vrgeth it. presse their other Protestant Brethren in matters of much smaller importance.
By which so many foresaide examples of our Catho [...]icke Faith, thus affirmed by the auncient Iewes that liued before Christs comming, it is made further probable that our religion is not new or lately deuised, but most auncient and vndoubtedly apostolicke: which point is made as yet much more cleare by that which is hereafterSee hereafter tract. [...]. sect. 7. & 8. alleadged concerning the Romane Church being conuerted in the Apostles time and her not being sithence changed in religion.
THAT TREW MIRACLES MAKE a strong argument: And that the aforesaide faith whereto the Englishe were conuerted, was confirmed with such Miracles. § 5.
AND like as in those firster times of the Churches infancie, our Sauiour did make manifest the truth of his Apostles Doctrine with vndoubted Miracles, to serue as [...]. cor 12, 12. signes of theire Apostleshipe, to that end.Marc. 16, 20. Confirming the word wi [...]h s [...]gnes followinge: So likewise this vertue or power of Miracles not ceasing, but (as our aduersaries confesse)Whereas our Sauiour, Ihon. 14, 12. saith. Hee that beleeueth in mee the workes that I do he shall do and greater: In the Marginall Notes of the Englishe Bibles (Printed 1576.) it is there-upon saide, this is referred to the wholle Body of the Church, in whome this vertue doth shine for euer. shininge in the Church for euer, the necessitie thereof being one and the same in all succeeding ages to the conuersion of the heathen, who contemning the scriptures, are nothing moued with the Miracles thereof mencioned, our Sauiour did in like maner confirme our now faith so then taught by Aust [...]ne, with like manifestation of Miracles, not such only as Antichrist or the Diuell can by the power of nature or secondarie [Page 35] causes bring to passe, which may beThes. 2, 9. lying signes, against which wee are forewarned, but with Miracles exceeding the power of nature, and done imediately by God: which by the Doctrine of learned ProtestantsVrsinus in Cōmentar. catech. pag. 21. fine saith: Etsi Ethnicorum nonnulla miracula commemorantur, ac de Antichristo, & pseudoprophetis dictum est edituros esse signa &c. tamen caneque numero ne (que) magnitudine paria sunt miraculis Ecclesiae &c. primum enim ea miracula quae iactantur ab hostibus ecclesiae, sunt eiusmodi, quae (ordine naturae non mutato) hominum vel diabolorū fraudibus possunt effici &c. miracula vero quibus Deus ecclesiā ornauit, opera sunt preter aut contra naturae & causarum secundarum ordinem, ac proinde non nisi diuina potentia facta. And the like is affirmed by Zanchius in D. Pauli epistolas ad Philipenses, Colloss. & Thessai. pag. 241. & 242. By Danaeus in Isagoges Christianae. part. 4. pag. 43. initio 46. fine & 47 initio By Piscator in Annal. epistolarum Pauli pag. 470 paulo ante med. and by many others. are euermore true and infallible, of which kinde though some be somtimes done (as the scriptures forewarneMat. 17, 22. & DaneusDanaeus in Isagoges Christianae part. 4. pag. 48. initio saith: Ad eos qui donum duntaxit miraculorum adeo acceperunt absque dono regenerationis, pertinet, quod ait Christus, multi dicent mihi in die illo; Domine nonne per nomen tuum prophetauinius, & daemonia eiecimus &c. And see the same further affirmed by Sigroartus in 23. disputat. theolog. & p. 164 sect. 12 &c. 13. confesseth) by professors of wicked life (accordingly as our Sauiour in like manerMat. 10, 1. gaue power ouer vncleane spirites, and to cure all maner of diseases to his Twelue Disciples: Whereof euen the wicked Iudas Mat. 10, 4. was then one) yet are the Miracles so wrought though by such neuerthelesse certaine and vndoubted testimonies of Gods truth, and for such in general are MIRACLES throughout the wholle course of scriptures most fully both acknowledgedExod. 8, 19. & 3. Reg. 17, 24 & 3. Reg. 18, 39. & 4. Reg. 5, 15. & Mat 27, 54. & Mat. 14, 25, 33. & Ioan. 2, 23 & 3, 2. & 4, 53. & 9, 30 & 11, 45. & act. 4, 14 16. & 9, 35. and vrged,Exodus 7, 17. & 16, 12. & numer. 16, 12 28. & Iosue 3, 10, 16. & 3. Reg. 13, 3, 5. & 18, 24, 38. & 20, 23, 28. & 4. Reg. 20, 8, 9, 10. & Mat. 9, 6. & Marc. 2, 10 & Ioan. 14, 11. & 15, 24. & 20, 30, 31. as being euen to our Sauiour him selfeIoan. 5, 36. a greater Testimonie then Iohn.
And hence it is that the credible histories as well of all former times, as also of thisIn the booke entituled a report of the kingdome of Congo a region of Aphricke printed 1597 published by Mr. Abraham Hartwell seruant to the Lord Archbishop of Canterburie, and by him dedicated to his Lo. mention is made l. 1. c. 1. initio. Of the discouerie of that Kingdome Anno 1587 by Odoardo Lopes: and of the Conuersion therof to the Christian faith l. 2 c. 2. and of the greate and vndoubted miracles shewed by God in the presence of a wholle armie l. 2. c. 3. in so much that Mr. Abraham Hartwell in his epistle there to the Reader post medium, confesseth that this Conuersion of Congo was accomplished (by Massing Priestes) and after the Romish maner. And this action (sath he) which tend [...]th to the glory of God shall it be concealed and not committed to memorie, because it was performed by popishe Priestes, and popishe meanes? God forbid. In like manner Mr. Iohn Porie lately of Goneuill & Caius College in Camebrige in the Geographicall history of Aphrica by him published Anno 160 pag. 410 versus finem, acknowledgeth and mencioneth the said Miracles and page 413 initio he commendeth Mr. Hartwell for Publishing his fores [...]ide treatise. Also wheras it appeareth in the booke entituled: Rerum in oriente gestarum Commentarius. fol. 2 that Francis Xauerus set forwarde in his iorney from Lisbone to the East India Anno 1541 to the Conuersion of those Nations, and page 36. That the King of Portugall hearing of the great Miracles as then there wrought, sent forth his Commission to his Vice-Roy there dated in Aprill 1556 to take examination therof vpon oath, vpon execution wherof and certificate therupon being accordingly made, it did appeare (fol. 8. b.) that Xauerus in testimonie and proofe of the Christian faith by him then preached and taught, Cured miraculously the Dumbe, the Lame, the Deafe, and with his Worde healed the Sicke. (and fol. 9. a.) raised sondry dead persons to life, and after his death which happened (fol. 14. a) Anno 1552 the graue being opened, wherein his dead body for a time had bene buri [...]d, to the end his naked bones might be carried from thence to Goa (fol. 14. b.) they found his body not onely vnconsumed, but a [...]so yeelding forth fragrant smells from whence they carried it to Goa, and placed it there in the Church of S. Paull, where yet to this day (saith the Commentarie) it remaineth free from corruption: Witnes wherof saith that treatise are all the inhabitants of that Citie, and trauellers that repaire thither, and the truth hereof for matter of facte is so probable, that Mr. Whit [...]ker lib. de ecclesia contra Bellarminum page 353. dare not in his answere therto alto [...]ither rest in deniall of the matter of facte, but saith: ne putet (Bellarminus) me omnino haec mir [...]ula contemnere: respondeo fieri posse vt in regno pontificio fuerint huiusmodi miracula & nunc sint. and page 354. post medium (he saieth:) Potuit Diabolus Xauerij corpus ad tempus seruare incorruptum & suauiter olens: and so he not so much denieth those miracles as ouer bouldly referreth thē to the Diuels worke: wheras yet to the contrarie Mr. Richard Hackluit preacher in his booke of principall nauigations &c. printed 1599 in the 2. parte of the 2. volume page 88. initio. doubteth not to afford cōmendable mention of that holy man (Xauerus) his perticuler vertues and wonderfull workes in that Region present age, are [Page 36] plentifull in like examples of true and vndoubted Miracles shewed by God, at the Conuersion of heathen Nations. Amonge which our Countries foresaid conuersion by Austine houldeth not the least place, as being in like maner greately then confirmed with vndoubted Miracles, not lately fained, but so credibly testified by the faithfull writers of those times, that now sithence they are acknowledged for certaine and true by learned Protestantes themselues. To this end doth S. Bede and our owne Chronicles witnes, how that AustineBeda hist. l. 2. c. 2. ante medium saith. Allatus est quidam de genere Anglorum, oculorum luce priu [...]tus &c. tandem Augustinus iusta necessitate compulius, flectit genua sua &c. deprecans vt visum caeco quem amiserat restitueret, & per illuminationem vnius hominis corporalem, in plurimorum cordibus fidelium spiritalis gratiae lucem accenderet, nec mora illuminatur caecus, ac verus summae lucis praeco ab omnibus predicatur Augustinus, tum Britonis confitentur intellexisse se veram esse viam iusticiae quam preditet Augustinus. And see Hollinsheads Cronicle after the last edition volum. 1. l. 5. c. 21. page 102 b lin. 51. to proue his [Page 37] opinion good, wrought a Miracle in restoring sight to one that was blinde. Which kinde of Miracle, as HemnigiusHemnigius in his exposition of the 84. Psal. englished part. 1. c. 6. acknowledgeth for a true Miracle, so likewise the Christian Brittons present thereat, were speciallyBeda vbi supra and Hollinshead vbi supra moued there-with. In like maner it is testified by S. Bede and Protestant writers, that Austine perswaded the King to his religionBeda hist. l. 1. c. 26 circa medium saith of the King, Miraculorum multorum ostensione credens Baptizatus est, and Hollinshed vbi supra pag. 100 b, line 60. and Mr. Foxe in his actes & monuments printed 1576. page 117 a prope finem. by diuerse MIRACLES shewed. Which were at those times so certainely knowne, that (as S. Bede reporteth) it wasBeda hist. l. 2. c. 3 fine. written in the Epitaphe vpon his tombe: that he was: Suffultus a Deo Miraculorum operatione.Beda hist. l. 2. c. 1 versus finem saith. Quibus verbis beatus Gregorius declarat quod Sanctus Augustinus & socij eius coelestium ostensione signorum gentem Anglorum ad cognitionem veritatis perducebant. and S. Gregory himselfe l. 7. epist. 30 indict. 1 reporteth hereof to Eulogius Archbishope of Alexandria saying. Knowe then that wheras the English nation &c. remained hitherto in infidelitie, I did by the helpe. of your praiers &c. send vnto that nation (Austine) a Moncke of my monasterie to preach to them &c. & now letters are come to vs, both of his health & of his worke that he hath in hand: And surely either he or they which were sent ouer with him, worke so many Miracles in that Nation as they may seeme therein to imitate the power and miracles of the Apostles them selues. And Gregorie him selfe, not only affirmeth those Miracles, but also by hisHollinshead vbi supra page 192 a line 25. Letters dated Anno. 602. did speciallyThis letter of Gregorie is extant in Bede hist. lib. 1. c. 31 and mencioned by Hollinshead vbi supra page 102 a. l. 10, 11. &c. write to Austine touching the Miracles shewed by him, aduising him not to glorie therein, but rather to consider that God gaue him the gifte for the weale of those to whome he was sent &c. In so much that Mr. Foxe and Mr. Godwine (both of them learned Protestantes) do accordingly mention and acknowledgeMr. Foxe in his actes and monumentes printed 1576. page 117. a. prope finem and Mr. Godwine in his Catalogue of the Bishops of England page 4 fine. the Miracles (then) wrought by Austine through Gods hand. As also S. Bede, Mr. Foxe, and Hollenshead do in like maner speacially mencionBeda hist. lib. 2. c. 12. post medium and Mr. Foxe his actes and monumentes printed 1576 page 121 b. post medium 122 a. and Hollinshead in his greate Chronicle the last edition volume 1. page 108 b initio & 109 a line 29. 30 &c. the Miraculous conuersion [Page 38] of Edwine King of Northumbers, which hapned some 26. yeares after Augustines foresaide comming into England, Mr. Foxe not doubting to place the same in his Catallogue ofMr. Foxe in the Alphabeticall table of his actes and monuments printed 1576 at the word Miracle. true Miracles. Here-vnto we coulde likewise add, the vndoubted many and greate MiraclesAs concerning the miracles of Malachias: To omitt perticuler mention of them, no meaner a witnes then S. Bernard, who liued in the same time with him, and was to him so familiarlye knowne, saieth of them in generall (in vita Malachiae: In what kinde of olde miracles did not Malachias excell? Hee wanted not proph [...]sie, nor reuelation, not the gifte of healing, and to conclude not raising of the dead. And no lesse vndoubted miracles are written of S. Bern [...]rd by his owne scholler Godfridus, & others of that time, who write his life: Godfridus (de vita Sancti Bernardi lib. 3. c. 5.) mencioning an vndoubted knowen miracle wrought by him in Tholouse in confirming of his doctrine against the Heretickes called Apostolic: who (as appeareth heareafter tract. 2. c. 2. sect. 3 in the margent vnder the letter [...]n. denied the Reall Presence, Masse, Purgatory &c. of which said miracle S. Bernard him selfe in his 241 epistle (which was written to the same persons) giueth a modest signification in like wordes, as doth S. Paull 1. Thessal. 1, 5. the many miracles of S. Bernard are so credibly and certainely reported, that Osiander in Centur. 12. page 310. post med. dare not rest in deniall of them, but saith of them, Partim permissione Dei, praestigijs Satanicis effecta existimo, non quod S. Bernardum magum suisse putem, sed quod verisimile sit Satanam talia miracula effecisse &c. ad confirmationem idolatriae & falsorum cultuum: so good a Protestant he maketh S. Bernard. wrought of later times, (to omitte sondry [Page 39] others) by holy Malachias, and S. Bernard, both of them confessed, and knowneAs concerning Malachias his Religion: Osiander Centur. 12. page 315. post med. saieth: Malachias Archiepiscopus in Hibernia abineunte aetate literis & religioni addictus tandem inuitus & diu admodum coactus Archiepiscopatum Hiberniae assumpsit S. Bernardo admodum familiaris fuit, eius monachatum admiratus & imitatus est, superstitiones Pontificias amplexus, Romanum Pontificem pro Deo coluit, tribuuntur illi admodum plurima miracula &c. (& vide ibidem page 256. post medium.) and S. Bernard in vita Malachiae affirmeth that Malachias was Legate to the Pope. As concerning S. Bernardes religion of whom Mr. Whitaker (in prelect. de ecclesia contra Bellarminum page 369 paulo post medium) saith: Bernardum vere sanctum fuisse existimo: He was Abbot of Claireuaux (as testifieth Symon de Voyon vpon the Catallog. &c. page 126.) and he acknowleged so plainely the Popes primacie. (wherof see S. Bernard l. 2. de consider. ad Eugenium & l. 3. c 8 and epist. 125. & 131. & 190 ad Innocentium.) That he is therfore reproued by D. Fulke (against the Rhemish Testament in Luc. 22. sect. 11. fol. 133 b. post initium) and by Mr. Whitaker. lib. 2. contra Duraeum page 154 ante medium. and was so euidently a professed Catholicke, that Gomarus in speculo Ecclesiae page. 23. versus finem alleageth him to vs saying. Bernardus sanctus vester: and mr. Whitaker in respons. ad ratio. Camp. rat. 7. P. 105 ante med.) saith, Bernardus quem ecclesia vestra multis annis vnum tulit Pium Virū: &c. Lastly this point is yet made further euident in Malachias, and Bernard: in that it is manifest that they both liued Anno. Domini. 1140. When the profession of our now Catholicke faith was most florishing; which thing Mr. Iewell In his defence of the Apology printed 1571. pag. 557. Paulo ante med. confesseth saying, S. Bernard liued in the midest of the Popes rout and tirany: Whereupon it followeth that for so much as neither of them is found to haue bene troubled for any one point of Doctrine disagreeing from those times, but were to the contrary both of thē in high fauour as then with the Romane Sea, th'one of thē being the Popes Legate the other an Abbot, that therfore they were agreeable in religion to the professed Doctrine of those times: So improbably do our aduersaries pretend S. Bernard to haue bene a member of their Church, for his only then zealouse reprouing the corruption of life and manners in the Clergie of that age. members of our now professed Catholicke faith.
THAT HIS MAIESTIES AVNcestours liued and died in that faith: and that it is acknowledged by Protestants for sufficient to Saluation. § 6.
IN this faith thus dedicated and continued, haue your MAIESTIES most Noble Auncestours (KINGES and QVEENS of this Realme) for so many ages togither liued and died, with peace towardes God, and honour to the worlde. In this faith died your HIGHNES dearest MOTHER (of Blessed Memory (admired at her death for her moste Christian resolution, the which (at the time of her Funerall) was accordingly and for such Celebrated, euen by the then Preacher Protestant whom the Puritanes publickely, and reprochfully traduced, for that (to vse their owne wordes therefor had of him)Martin Marprelate in his Epistle Printed ouer Sea &c. pag. 50. Preaching at Peterburrow Agust. 2. Anno. 1587. at the funerall of one who died a professed Papist (viz. the Scottish Queene) he praied that his soule and the soules of all there present might be with the soule of the dead Papist. For this faith thus taught vs, haue our learned aduersaries honoured.Mr. Cowper late Bishope of Lincolne in his foresaid Chronicle fol. 156. a. Mr. Bilson now Bishope of winchester in his true difeference betweene Cristiane subiection & vnchristian rebellion, Part 1. pag. 57. & Mr. Foxe in his Acts and Monuments Printed 1576. pag. 117. a. Mr. D. Fulke in his booke against Heskins Sanders, &c. p. 561. fine & 562. initio. Gregorie and Austine with due and answerable commendation, calling therefore th'one of themMr. Godwine in his Catallog. of Bishopes pag. 7. ante med. S. Austine Mr. Godwine vbi supra pag. 7. initio. our Apostle and th'otherMr. Godwine vbi supra pa. 3 ante med. that Blessed and holy Father S. Gregorie &c. To this faith like-wise haue all the learned Protestants of sober [Page 40] Iudgement afforded the promisses of hopefull saluatiō, as appeareth most plainely. 1. By their owne most euident testimonies. 2. By their like confessed examples thereof giuen. 3. And by their vndoubted answerable practize. To giue proofe of euery of these partes.
And 1. First concerning theire testimonies in this kinde: Mr. D. Baro saith,Mr. D. Baro in his foure sermons and two questions disputed ad clerū &c. serm. 3. pag. 448. fine. I dare not deny the name of Christians to the Romanistes sithe the learneder writers do acknowledge the Church of Rome to be the Church of God And Mr. Hooker also saith.Mr. Hooker in his third booke of Ecclesiasticall Policie pag. 188. initio. And Iohannes Regius in his liber. Apologeticus &c. p. 95. fine. saith In Papatu autem cum fuerit ecclesia vera. &c. The Church of Rome is to be reputed a part of the House of God, a limme of the visible Church of Christ: andMr. Hooker vbi supra pag. 130 ante med. we gladly acknowledge them to be of the familie of Iesus Christ: Mr. Bunnie likewise saith of Catholickes and protestants:Mr. Bunnie in his tretise tending to Pacificatiō sect. 18. p. 109 circa med. Neither of vs may iustly accompt the other to be none of the Church of God, Mr. Bunny vbi supra pag. 113. post med. we are no seuerall Church from them, nor they from vs: In like sorte doth Mr. D. Some in defence thereof (against Penrie the puritane) say:Mr. D. Some in his defence against Mr. Penrie & refutation of many absurdities &c. in Mr. Penries treatise pag. 164. ante med. that the Papistes are not altogither aliens from Gods couenant, I haue shewed before: forMr. Doct. Some vbi supra pag. 182. initio. in the Iudgement of all learned men and all reformed Churches, there is in Poperie a Church, a Ministerie, a true Christ &c. Mr. D. Some vbi supra pag. 176. prope finem. If you thinke that all the Popishe sorte which died in the Popish Church are damned you thinke absurdly, and dissent from the Iudgment of the learned Protestants. Lastly to omitte many othersPeter martir (as appeareth by his Epistles annexed to his common places in English pag. 153. a. fine. Desired at the conference had at Poysie betweene the Catholickes and Protestants, that they should not for diuersitie of opinion breake brotherlie Charitie, nor call one another Heritickes: and see the same opinion yet further affirmed by the Protestāt writter against Nicholas Machiuell. printed at London 1062. page 80 post medium & 83 paulo post medium & 85. prope finē. (for we are vnwilling to become tediouse to your MAIESTIE) Mr. D. Couell in his late treatise Published by Authoritie and didecated to the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury, defendeth this opinion at large, and concludethMr. D. Couel in his defence of mr. Hookers fiue bookes of Ecclesiasticall pollicie. P [...]blished by authoritie. page 77. ante med. saying wee affirme them) of the Church of Rome (to be partes of the Church, of Christ, and that those that liue and die in that Church may notwith-standing be saued: In so much as he doubteth not to charge the Puritanes [Page 41] withmr. D. Couel. vbi supra page 68. paulo post med. Ign [...]rance for their contrary opinion. 4 Hithe [...]to concerning their Testimonies before vndertaken.
2 Secondly, As concerning now their like confessed examples we will out of very many alleadge only some fewe: It will not (we thinke) be denied but that our late SOVERAIGNE KING Henry the Eight, did after his breach with Rome, beleeue and maintaine the wholl frame and substance of our now professed Catholicke faith, the Article of the Popes Premacie only excepted. To which end their owne author Sleidane saith of himSleydan in English .l. 13. fol. 174. a. initio: He exiled the name of the Bishope of Rome, but kept still his Doctrine: and Mr. Foxe saith a [...]cordingly:Foxe act. monu. pag 1472. b. sine He set forth and by full consent of Parliament established the booke of sixe Articles conteining the summe of Popish Religion. And it is euident that he himselfe in person, not only as then disputed,Act. monu. pag. 530 a. & b. initio. but also commaundedact. monu. page 533. a circa med. sentence to be pronounced against Lamberte: as also the L. Cromwell redde andact. monu. page 533. a. pronounced that sentence, and at his owne death protested him selfeAct. mon. page 598 b circa med. & see Hollinsheads Chronicle page 591. to die in the Catholicke faith, not doubting in any Article of faith or Sacrament of the Church, though (saith he) many haue slaundred me to the contrarie. And yet is he commended by Mr. Foxe to dye asAct. mon. page 598 b. post med. a valiant Souldier and Captaine of Christ: as also the Church vnder the raigne of King Henry the .8. is by Mr. Fulke affirmed to be a true Mr. Fulke against Heskines, Sanders &c. pag. 564. sect 80. & 82. Chur [...]h: and the King him selfe acknowleged in like manner forFulke vbi supra sect. 82 and see D. Humfrey in Iesuitismi. part. 2. rat. 3 page 304 circa med. a member of the Catholi [...]ke Church of Christ. In like sorteOsiander cent. 12. pag. 309 post med. S. Bernard liued (some 400 yeares since, as Mr. Iewell confesseth) euenIewell in his defence of the Apologie printed 1571. page 557. paulo ante med. and see Whitaker contra Duraeum l. 2 page 154 ante med. in the middest of the Pope rou [...]e and tyrany: And as we do not finde that he was then troublede or gainesaid so much as in an one article diffe ēt f om the doctrine of the Romane Church of that tim [...], so we find confessed to the contrarie, that he acknowleged euenBernard l. 2 de considerat. ad Eugeniū & vide epist. 125. & 131 & ep. 190 ad Innocentiū and see this confessed by mr. Fulke against the Rhemishe Testament in Luc. 22. sect. 11. fol. 133. b. post initium. and by Mr. Whitaker l. 2. contra Duraeum, pag. 154. ante med the Popes Supremacie, & was so conformable [Page 42] to the doctrine of the Romane Church, that he was madeOsiander in epitō. &c. cent. 12. page 309. and Symon de voyon. in his catalog. &c. pag. 926 Abbot of Claireuaux, being alsoOsiander vbi supra page 309. fine saith: Centum & quadraginta Monasteriorum author fuisse creditur: and Danaeus in primae partis altera parte contra Bellarminum page 940. saith. Hieronimus & Bernardus fuerunt monachi & istius erroris authotes & fautores. author of many monasteries: In so much as our aduersaries alledging him to vs do call him, Sanctus vesterGomarus in speculo ecclesiae pag. 23. fine. our S. andWhitaker in respons. ad rat. Campiani. rat. 7. pa. 105. ante med. saith: Bernardus ecclesia vestra, multis annis vnum tulit pium virum. a man brought forth by our Church: who in regard of Christian communion was deerelyOsiander Centuria. 12. page 305 post med. familiar to Malachias whom our aduersaries reiecte for a confessedOsiander ibid. See his wordes heretofore sect. 5. in the margent at the figure. 3. initio. Catholicke, or papist. And yet this his knowne religion notwithstanding our aduersaries do acknowledge him forWhitaker de ecclesia page 369 paulo post med. saith. Ego quidem Bernardum vere fuisse Sanctum existimo. And see thee like in Whitaker against mr. William Rainoldes page 125 & 126 a true Sainte Osiander Cent. 12. page 309 post med. a very good man, See this in Pasquils returne into England. page 8. & 13. a good Father, & one of the lampes of the Church of God. In like maner S. Bede (who liued about 900 yeeres since) was so euidently of our religion, that our aduersary Osiander therfore saith of him:Osiander in epitom. &c. cent. 8. l. 2. c. 3. pag. 58. initio. Beda was wrapped in all the popish errors, wherin we at this day dissent from the Pope, for he admired and imbraced the worshippe of Images, the popish Masse, inuocation of Saintes. &c. which thing appeareth also yet more vndoubtedly: (to omitt his euident writinges) by hisSee mr. Foxe act. monu. printed. 1576. p. 128. & 129 confessed credite and estimation had with the Popes of that age, and yet is he (all this notwithstanding) acknowleged by our aduersaries to haue beneOsiander cent. 8. p. 58. ante med. a good man mr. Couper in his Chronicle at the yere of our Lord 734. fol. 171 b. renowned in all the world, for his learning & godly life: for which he was also priuileged with the surname ofOf this title see Hollensheds Chronicle at the yeere 735. and mr. Couper in his Chronicle at the yeere 724. fol. 168. b. and mr. Foxe act. mon. printed 1576. pag. 128. b. & vide 129. a. & Oecolampadius in libro epistolarum Zuinglij & Oecolampadij p. 654 post med. Reuerend, and by D. Humfrey specially registred, amongHumfredus in Iesuitismi part. 2. rat. 3. p. 326. initio. the godly men raised vp by the holy Ghost. Hitherto also appertaineth the like examples of Gregory and Austine both of them heretofore acknowleged forhereof see heretofore tract. 1. sect. 1 d. 2. 3. e confessed popish Catholickes, [Page 43] and yet th'one of them called by our aduersaries,hereof see before in this section at d. That Blessed and holy Father S. Grego. & the otherbefore in this section at b.c. S. Austine our Apostle: where-vnto (to omitte others) might be added the foremencioned example of your HIGHNES Dearest Mother, whose vndoubted Saluation (her knowne religion notwithstanding) was (euen in that oposition of time) by the learned aduesarie as beforebefore in this section at z. publickly acknowledged. What now can our aduersaries answere vnto these confessed examples? Is thereIames. 1, 17. with God variablenes? orEphes. 6, 9. & deutro. 10, 17. & Rom. 2, 11 & 1. Peter. 1.17. any acception of persons? or is heNumer. 23, 19. as the sonne of man that he should change so as one and the same religion, which was before in them holy, should now be in vs damnable? And thus much breifly concerning certaine vndoubted examples of this kinde.
3 Thirdly to make this point, more euident as yet by the like answerable practise of almost all Protestant reformed Churches. Whereas they hould thatIn the propositions and principles disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua page 166. sect. 25. the Sacraments are only to be administred, to those that are taken for knowne members of the Church: Which no man can be with-out faith, because thatHebr. 11, 6. without faith it is impossible to please God. For which cause they teach concerning Infants, who in their opinion haue notThat children haue not faith is affirmed by master Carth write in mr. Whitgifts defence pa. 611. And in the propositiōs & principls disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua. p. 178. sect 4. & by Iacob. Kimedoncius in his redemption of mankind l. 2. c 15. page 164 fine. and by mr. Whitaker contra Dureum lib. 8 pag. 682. faith, (which as the scriptures witnesRom. 10, 17. commeth by hearing which Infants cannot accomplish) thatSo saye the Deuines of Geneua in the foresaid propositions and principles disputed page 178. sect. 4. also Oecolampadius in libro epistolarum Oecolampadij & Suinglij l. 2. page 301. circa med. saith hereof. Parentum & compatrum fides pueros sanctificat. And Praetorius l. de Sacramentis page 108. saith: Respectu fidelium parentum, infantes fideles habentur. &c. Credunt igitur infantes, sed in parentibus they are comprehended within the couenant of eternall life, by meanes of the faith of theire Parents, &In the propositions & page 178 are for that cause to be Baptixed, and that there-fore the Children of Iewes, Turkes and such like professed Infidels, areIn the propositions & principles &c. vbi supra. sect 8. page 179. and mr. Whitaker contra Duraeum l. 8. page 679. fine saith. Infidelium liberos (vt Turcarum, Iudeorum, Ethnicorum Caluinus meritò & veré negat esse baptizandos and the like is taught by Kimnedoncius in his redemption of mankind: l. 2. c. 15 page 167 fine: and see mr. D. Some in his defence against Penrye, and refutation &c. page 150. not to be Baptized, as not being comprehended within the couenant, by reason that their Parents do not beleeue. All this yet notwith-standing [Page 44] they professeTaught by mr. Whit gifte in his defence. &c. page 623 ante med. By mr. Hooker in his ecclesiasticall policie l. 3. sect. 1. page 131 by D. Some vbi supra page 149 & 150 and in the foresaide propositions and principles: &c. page 179. sect 9. It is saide by the Diuines of Geneua: We are of minde that the children of Papists may be receaued vnto Baptisme: to teach and practise their Baptizing of Infants Borne of Catholicke (or as they terme) Popishe Parents: Not (saith Mr. Hooker) in regard ofmr. Hooker vbi supra: Gods promise which reacheth vnto a thousand generations: for by this reason the Children of Turkes and (as Mr. Hooker saith)Master Hooker ibidem: all the worlde may bee Baptized, in so much as no man is a thousand discents remoued from Adam. But their saide Baptising of them is (according to the other premises of their Doctrine) by them selues practised and holden good, though (as Mr. D. Some affirmethmr. Some in his foresaide defence &c. cap. 22. page 165 & 167 to Penry) they were the Children of Popishe west-Indians whose other former auncestors neuer knew the Christian faith, and though (saith hee) those West-indiansMaster Some ibidem: page 167. were Baptized by Popish Shauelings, yet they receaued true Baptisme and were ingraffed into Christ, and for this reason, because there is a Church in Popery, for (saith he)mr. Some ibidem p. 149 post med. saith: And Amandus Polanus in partic. theologic. page 305: post med. saith. Hodierna Ecclesia Romana est adhuc Ecclesia Christi, sed omnium impurissima &c. alioquin ij qui in papatusunt baptizati, extra ecclesiam Christi. ac proinde nec baptismo Christi fuissent baptisati. &c. If there were no Church at all in Popery, (then) the Infants of Papistes were not to be Baptized in any reformed Church: By which premisses of their confessed practise it appeareth 1 that the Children of Catholicke (or Popish) Parents are to be Baptized 2 as being comprehended within the couenant of eternall life: 3 and that by reason of their parents Faith: So euidently in their Doctrine and practise, is the faith of the Catholicke (or Popish) Parents, houlden for auaileable to his Childe. And shall it then be thought damnable to him selfe? or houlden worthy to be yet further persecuted by our so implacable and vnrelenting aduersaries?
THAT PROTESTANTS CANNOT proue, that the Romane Church did change her Religion, since the first Conuersion thereto in the Apostles time. § 7.
AND for so much as it is your HIGHNESIn the summe of the Conference before the Kings Maiestie pag. 75. circa med. Constant and resolute opinion, that no Church ought further to seperate it selfe from the Church of Rome, then shee hath departed from her selfe, whē shee was in her florishing & best estate. In further probabilitie therfore of the Premisses we do presume hereby most humbly to submitte to your MAIESTIES most learned Iudgment this briefe discourse had thereof in the two sections next ensuing: it is generally confessed that the Romane Church was once the true Church and professed the right faith, whereto theI thanke my God for you &c. because your faith is renowned throughout the wholle worlde. Rom. 1, 8. To all that be at Rome, the beloued of God called to be Saintes, grace to you. Rom. 1, 7. That which is common to vs both, your faith and mine. Rom. 1, 12. Your obedience is published in euery place. Rom. 16, 19. Apostle him selfe giueth full and assured testimonie: where-vpon it euidently followeth that if the Romane Church haue not sithence changed her religion, then she still retaineth and persisteth in the right faith.
Now as touching her supposed change. we will breifely examine what our learned aduersaries (who haue purposely and seriously laboured in discouery or proofe of this pretended change) do most materially obiect in that behalfe 1 First thenMr. Whitaker contra Duraeum. l. 7 page 480 initio: and mr. Fulke in his answere to a counterfeite Catholike p. 36. post med. the first (saith Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Fulke) That exercised Iurisdiction vpon forraine Churches was Victor: whereto we answere (as doth the Lord Archbishope of Canterburie concerning womans Baptisme) saying to Mr. Carthwrightmr. Whitgifte in his defence page 510 prope finem. you say in the margent that Victor Anno. 198. did first appointe that women might Baptize, by this you do add more credit to the cause then you are aware of, for Victor was a Godly Bishope and Martir and the Church at that [Page 46] time was in greate Purity as not being longe after the Apostles whereto we further add, that whereas Victor in the example now vrged, did vpon occasionThe occasion hereof was that the Churches of Asia minor had receaued of S. Iohn the Euangelist to obserue our Lordes Pasch or Easter day not alwaies vppon Sonday but with the Iewes (in regarde of theire knowne weakenes) vpon the 14. of the moone, as in like sorte vpon the same groūd was for the time tollerated, Circumcision: Act. 16, 3. and abstinence from bloode and that which is strangled. Act. 15, 20. The Bishops of Rome who had receaued of S. Peter and Paule the other manner did accordinglye tollerate the Churches of Asia, til such time as that certaine of them in Asia made this their obseruation necessarie, in so much that the other manner was condemned by the Iudaizing hereticke B [...]asius. Tertulian de praescript. circa finem: and centur. 2. c. 5 col. 107. l. 12. hereupon Victor thought good to tollerate them no longer, and therfore prescribed the Bishops of Asia to be excomunicated, vnlesse they conformed them selues to the latine Church in the obseruation of Easter day. then seeming very slenderThe Churches of Asia not denying the feast of Easter, but differing onely from the Romane Church in the day on which it should be kept, wherin also they had (as they presumed) the fore mentioned example and tradition of S. Iohn for their warrant, thought this no iust cause of excomunication. excomunicate the Bishopes of Asia: wherein (saith Mr. Fulke)mr. Fulke in his answere to a counterfaite Catholicke page 36 post med. (he passed the boundes of his Authoritie, howso-euer the Bishopes of Asia (in respect of the saide occasion seeming to them so slender) censured Victor as ouer seuere,Euseb. hist. l. 5 c. 23 & 24 yet (which is most to be obserued) no one of them (though thus in their owne opinion prouoked,) chargeth him (as in all reason if they might they would) with any vndue claime or exercise of vsurped authoritie:Euseb. hist. l. 5 c. 24. initio. reporteth how Ireneus who thought Victor ouer sharpe herein, admonisheth Victor by letters that he would not for the obseruation of a Tradition so long vsed, quite cut of so many Churches from the bodye of the vniuersall Church: in which wordes he doth not so much impugne as plainely acknowledge his authoritie. for how could Victor so cut them of vnles he had authoritie therin. euen Ireneus him selfe (who stood most herein) acknowledgeth so plainely els where, the Primacie of the Romane see, that he is therefore specially reprehendedCent. 2. c. 4 col. 64 l. 10. It is said: Nouitatē deinde quandā & illud recipere quibusdam videri posset, quod in exemplaribus Irenei, qualia nunc h [...]bemus, extat libro tertio cap. tertio. Ad hanc Ecclesiam propter potentiorem principalitatem necesse [...]st omnem conuenire Ecclesiam &c. And in the Alphabeticall table of that centurie at the word Ireneus speciall reference being there made to this saying of Ireneus, it is withall saide therof: Irene [...] corrupta sen [...]entia de [...]r ma [...]u Ecclesiae Romanae: 64, 12. by the Centurie writers of Magdeburge: 2 Secondly Mr. WhitakerWhitaker contra Duraeum. l. 7. p. 480 giueth example In Zozimus, Bonifacius, and Celestinus. Bishopes of Rome,mr. Fulke in his answere to a counterfaite Catholicke pa. 37 circa medium. Challenging (saith Mr. Fulke) Prerogatiue ouer the Bishops [Page 47] in Aphrica by forging a false Canon of the Nicen Councell: Whereto we answere: that the former example of Victor who liued about some 200. yeares before these, fully auoideth this obiection: for if Victor so long before them challenged primacie, then did they but continue it, and not first bring it in; As for the suspitionThe suspition which Protestantes enforce was this: Zozimus Boniface and Celestinus to prooue vnto the Bishoppes of Aphrica appeales vnto Rome alleaged in behalfe therof the Nicene Councell: whervpon (saith mr. Iewell in the 4. article of his replye The said Aphricane Bishopes wrote to the Bishoppes of the East to see their copies of the Nicene Councell: vpon returne of which Copies from Cirrill Bishope of Alexandria and Atticus of Constantinople, there appeared therein no such Canon: As also (say they) neither in the 22 Canons set downe by Rufinus (hist. l. 10 c. 6) doth any such Canon appeare, whereupon Protestants vrge this to haue bene a forgery and innouation in Zozimus Boniface and Celestinus. of pretended forgery of the Canons of the Nicen Councell by Zozimus, Boniface, and Celestinus it is both vntrueVntrue for betweene the time of the Nicene Councell and of the foresaid Bishopes Cirrill of Alex andrra and Atticus of Constantinople; The Arrianes had occupied those sees, whereof see Socrates l. 2. Zozom. l. 4. Theodoret. l. 2. and Niceph. l. 9 & 10) and corrupted the true originals of the Nicene Councell, so as the Canons which Rufinus setteth downe and which Cirrill and Atticus sent (howsoeuer those Fathers thought of them) were false and corrupted, which to be true, appeareth many waies. 1 First in that sondry auncient Fathers haue alleaged sondry Canons of the Nicene Councell which are not to be found in these: As for example Ambrose ep. 82 saith: It was decreed in the Nicene Councell, Ne bigamus in clerum asciscatur: S. Austine ep. 110 saith, It was there decreed (Ne Episcopus sibi successorem sufficiat: Hierom. in praefat. Iudith saith, concerning the booke of Iudith: Hunc librum Synodus Nicena in numero Sanctarum scripturarum legitur computasle: And the Fathers of the second generall Councell of Constantinople (which was 30 yeeres before Zozimus) in their Sinodicall letters written to the Bishopes of Italye Damasus and others, extant in Theodoret hist. l. 5 c. 9. post medium, affirme that there was sanctorum Patrum in Concilio Niceno decisio: vt videlicet singularum Prouinciarum antistites vná cum finitimis (modo ipsis ita visum fuerit Episcopis) ministros ad ecclesiarum commodum in suis ipsorum prouincijs ordinent. Iulius who was Bishope of Rome presently after the Nicene Councell (in rescript. contra orientales pro Athanasio &c. which is in Isidors collection, and a great parte thereof specially recited and alleaged verbatim by Zozomin hist. l. 3. c. 7. & whereof see Socrates hist. l. 2 c. 11) saith, Canonibus in Nicena sinodo Iubentibus non debere preter sententiam Romani Pontificijs concilia caelebrari. And Socrates affirmeth accordingly that such a Canon was hist. l. 2 c. 5 & that it was alleaged by Iulius hist. l. 2 c. 13 and so likewise doth Zozomine hist. l. 3. c 9. also it is notoriouse and most certaine (as appeareth by Athanasius in epistola de sinodis Armini & Selenci, & by Eusebius de vita Constantini l. 3. c. 5. 17 & 18 and by Epiphan. haer. 69. that one principall occasion of the Nicen Councell was to determine the controuersie about the obseruation of Easter day, and that accordingly those Fathers made a Canon therof. To omitt sondry other like examples in that kind: (wherof read Concil. Aphricanum Can. 14. and Leo ep. 25. ad Theodosium Augustum. And the Lord Archbishope of Canterburie in his defence &c. page 334. post medium. And to omitt likewise that the Canons alleaged by Rufinus do vary from the Canons sent by Cirrillus both in number, order, and matter, diuers learned Protestants, as Oecolampadius, in libro epistolarum Occolampadij & Suin glij page 664. & 667. Caluin lib. 4. institut. c. 17. sect. 36. mr. Iewell in his Apologie of the Church of England. and mr. Bilson now Bishoppe of Winchester in his true difference betweene &c. part. 4. page 555 ante med. do acknowledge and mencion a Canon of the Nicene Councell concerning the Sacrament. All which said Canons are wanting aswel in the 22. Canons set downe by Ruffinus as also in the 20 Canons sent by Cirrill, in so much as Occolampadius vbi supra p. 664 ante med. expresly chargeth our latine copies as defectiue in this behalfe. 2. Secondly in that the Arrians had burned the originals of the Nicene Councell, which to be true appeareth by Athanasius in epist. ad omnes orthodoxos. And Iulius in rescript. ad Orientales alleageth in perticuler very many of the other Canons of the Nicene Councell, which Protestants now reiecte for forged, and among them one Canon concerning appeales to Rome. 3 Lastly the Aphricans (whom this matter most concerned) were so far from charging the said Popes with Innouation or forgerie that S. Austine one of them calleth Zozimus the most blessed Pope Zozimus: Aug. de gra. Christi l. 2 c. 2 & 6. 7. & 8. & 17 & epist. 157 & Concil. Aphric. in epist. ad Bonifacium. And like titles of reuerence and honour are giuen by the Aphricane Bishopes to Boniface, and Celestinus. Vide epistolam Aphricani concilij ad Bonifacium. & vide epist. Aphric. concil. ad Celestinum. andImpertinent because that the Councell of Sardica (not that hereticall conuenticle against Athanasius mentioned by Zozomen hist. l. 3. c. 10. And which mr. Whitaker mistaketh contra Dureū l. 7 p. 499) but that other Catholike councell mentioned by Dresserus in millenar. 5. page 104 & 246. and by Carion in chronic. p. 283 initio. and by Zozomen l. 3 c. 11. (wherat as witnesseth Theodoret hist. l. 2. c. 7 and Carion in chronic. page 282 post med.) Athanasius and many other of the Fathers of the Nicene Councell were present) affirmeth can. 7. before the times of Zozimus, Boniface, and Celestinus, this very matter of appealing to Rome, in so much as Caluine l. 4 institut. c 7 sect 9. mencioneth this decree, and thought that the Pope did not forge, but by mistaking alleage this decree of Sardica as the decree of the Councell of Nice, so cleare hereby it is that Zozimus, Boniface, and Celestinus were no Innouators. impertinent.
[Page 48]3 Thirdly Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Pope Siritius saying,Whitaker cont. Duraeum l. 7. page 480 ante medium. Siritius was the first that annexed perpetuall Chastitie to the Ministers of the word. Whereto we answere First that Mr. Whitaker alleageth no proofe that Siritius was the first, neither doth he or can he name any Catholicke writer of that time so reporting: Secondly we alleadge most plainely to the contrarie how that S. Hierome who liued in the time of Damasus predecessor to Siritius saith thereof.Hierom. in Apolog. ad Pamach. c. 3 and the same doctrine doth he affirme in c. 1 ad Titum: If Married men like not this, let them not be angry with me but with the holy scriptures, with all Bishopes Priests and Deacons, who know they cannot offer sacrifice, if they vse the act [Page 49] of Marriage: And this opinion was then not first begune, but (to the contrarie) so vniuersall, that Saint Hierome affirmeth it to be the generall Doctrine and practise ofHierom: contra Vigillant. c. 1 saith. Quid faciunt Orientis Ecclesiae quid Egipti & sedis Apostolicae? quae aut Virgines clericos accipiunt aut continentes, aut si vxores habuerint mariti esse desinunt. the Church of the East, of Egipte and the Sea Apostolicke. And in like manner was the Marriage of Priests long before these times so plainely impugned euen in the Greeke Church byEpiphanius haer. 59. after other plaine wordes had herof saith: At dices mihi in quibusdā locis adhuc liberos gignere, Presbiteros, Diaconos & Hipodiaconos: at hoc non est iuxta Canonē &c. So plainelye doth he acknowledge hereby a former Canon. Epiphanius,Origen in numer. hom. 23 saith: Certum est quia impeditur sacrificium indesinens ijs qui coniugalibus necessitatibus seruiunt, vn de videtur mihi quod illius est solius offerre sacrificium indesinens, qui indesinenti & perpetuae se deuouerit castitati. & vi de Origen in Leuit. hom: 4. & l. 8. contra Celsum. Origen, and also euen by that misapliedMisaplied for that many learned Protestants do vrge it in profe of Priestes marriage: wheras it prooueth the contrarie. example of Paphnutius,It doth appeare by Socrates hist. l. 1. c. 8. ante med. and Zozomen hist. l. 1. c. 22 and by the Centurie writers Cent. 4. c. 9 col. 656. line 44. and by mr. Fulke against the Rhemish Testament in Mat. 8 sect. 3. fol. 14 a. post med. that Paphnutius, though he thought that Priesthood did not dissolue marriage contracted before orders giuen, yet he affirmed to the Nicene Councell that those who were made Priestes before they were married, should not afterwards marry: alleaging for this (veterem Ecclesiae traditionem,) the auncient Tradition of the Church: so plainely doth Paphnutius hereby acknowledge that this doctrine was then holden for the Churches auncient Doctrine. that our learned aduersaries doubt not therefore toSo Ch [...]mnitius in his examen concil. Trident. part. 3. reprehendeth Hierom, Ambrose, and Origen page 50. a. ante med. and Epiphanius p. 62. a. initio. And Frigeuilleus Gauuius in his palma Christiana page 103 reprehendeth Socrates and Zozomen for their reporte of Paphnutius. reprehend the saide Fathers, and as Epiphanius and Paphnutius in their cited testimonies hereof, do in plaine tearmes rest vpon the Churches Doctrine before their times: so likewise the Fathers of theConcil. 2. Carth. can. 2. saith: Omnibus placet vt Episcopi, Presbiteri, & Diaconi &c. ab vxoribus se abstineant (and for this reason there sett downe) vt quod Apostoli docuerunt & ipsa seruauit antiquitas, nos custodiamus. Carthage Councell doubt not in like manner to ground this point vpon Antiquitie and the Apostles Doctrine. So euident hereby it is, that Siritius in his foresaide Doctrine hereof brought in no Innouation or change:
4 Fourthly Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Innocent the third sayingWhitaker l. 7 contr. Duraeum page 480. circa med. He that first inuented Transubstantiation was Innocent the third in the Laterane Councell: Whereto we answere First that Mr. Whitaker barely affirmeth but proueth not this his assertion, neither doth he alledge so much as any one author of those times, charging this Pope Innocent or that Councel [Page 50] with any Innouation or change of Doctrine in this matter. And we further say that Mr. Whitaker vrgeth this example how soeuer against his knowledg and learning, yet most clearely against all euidence of truth: for this Councell of Laterane was houlden Anno. 1215.Whitaker l. 7 contr. Duraeum page 480. circa med. And as appeareth by the said Councell and further testimonie ofCrispinus in his booke of the estate of the Church page 345. fine Protestants. there were present thereat the Patriarches of Hierusalem, and Constantinople; 70. Metropolitaines; 400. Bishopes: and 800. Conuentuall Priors. Now that so many learned men of so many seuerall remote Nations of the CHRISTAN worlde, as were here assembled, should all of them agree to decree Transubstantiation, & yet the same to be an Innouation (as Mr. Whitaker saith, then First inuented, is more thē improbable: The truth here of therefore was most plainely to the contrarie, that in the age before that Councell, the Doctrine of Transubstantiation was publicke and generall: only Berengarius as then impugned the same, and was therein publickly contradicted and specially written against by diuers FathersThere did in that age write purposelye in proofe of the Reall presence Anselmus Lanfrancus, Guitmundus Adelmanus, Algerus, Hugo Lingonensis, and others: in so much that Papir. Maslon. Annal. francorū l. 3. in Henrico Rege, testifieth saying. Berengario, omnes illius temporis Theologi Bellum indixere: And Oecolampadius in libro epist. Oecolampadij & Suinglij l. 3. pag. 712. fine saith, Viuo Berengario, multi contra ipsum scripserunt. of seuerall Nations in that age: In so much as the fore-saide Councell of Laterane was at length then afterwardes assembled against that his then new seeming opinion. A thing so euident that Mr. Foxe confesseth and saith therof,Foxe act. monumē printed 1576. pag. 1121 b. circa medium. about the yeare of our Lord 1060. the denying of Transubstantiation, beganne to be accoumpted Heresie, and in that num [...]er was first one Berengarius who liued about Anno. 1060. So farr was Transubstantiation from being (as Mr. Whitaker pretendeth) first affirmed or invented after-wardes in the Councell of Laterane Anno. 1215. Secondly we say that also the many sayings (ouer tediouse here to recite) of the other much more auncient Fathers who liued long before the Laterane Councell, are so plaine and pregnant for Transubstantiaton, that the learned Protestants thē [...]elues do in plaine tearmes accordingly acknowledge [Page 51] the same, and therefore reprehend the saide Fathers: To omitte the plaine testimonieOsiander in epitom. hist. eccles. Cent. 9. 10. 11. & page 95. fine: saith Anno. 950. exorta est in Clero Cantuariensi acris contentio de Pane Eucharistico, alij enim asseuerabant priorem panis substantiam remanere & nihillominus simul ibi verū Christi Corpus porrigi [...] alij verò pugnabant recitatis verbis Domini priorem substantiam elementorum prorsus euanescere at (que) transire in corpus Domini. &c. And Crispinus in his booke of the estate of the Church page 286. circa med. & pag 289 initio. & 323. post medium. confesseth that Paschasius (who liued Anno Domini 880.) taught Transubstantiation. herein of Osiander and some others: in this sort it is confessed and affirmed thatAffirmed by mr. Carelile in his booke that Christ descended not into Hell: fol. 58. and by Oecolampadius in libro epistolarum Oecolampadij & Suinglij. l. 3. page 661. and see Mr. Fulke against Heskens page 217 post med. & 204. ante med. & 296 fine. And by Carion in chronic. page 451. initio. Damascene taught Transubstantiation that bothSee the treatise entitled Commonefact. cuiusdam theologi de sacra Domini Caena. & eiusdem Commonefact. consideratio page 211. post med. where it is said, Theophilactus & Damascenus plané inclinant ad Transubstantiationé; & vide Chemnitiū examen. part. 2. p. 83. a. paulo post med. & pa. 90. b. circa medium. Damas [...]ene and Theophilacte do euidently encline to Transubstantiation: thatHumfredus in Iesuitismi part. 2 rat. 5. page 626 saith: In Ecclesiam verò quid inuexerunt Gregorius & Augustinus, intulerunt &c. Transubstantiationē &c. Gregorie the greate and Austine brought into England Transubstantiation: thatThe Centurie writers cent. 4. c. 10. col. 985. line 30. say of Eusebius Emissenus that, parum commode de Transubstantiatione dixit. &c. Eusebius, Emissenus did speake vnprofitably of Transubstantiation thatThe Centurie writers vndertaking in their fifth centurie. c. 4. col. 496. line 4. to set downe, errores Doctorum huius seculi do therein col. 517. line 23. say: Chrisostomus Transubstantiationem videtur confirmare nam ita scribit in sermone de Eucharistiae, num vides Panem? num Vinum? num sicut reliqui cibi in secessum vadunt? absit ne sic cogites, quemadmodum enim si cera igni adhibita illi assimilatur, nihil substantiae remanet, nihil superfluit, sic & hic puta misteria consumi corporis substantia. Chrisostome doth seeme to confirme Transubstantiation: whereto sondry other like examples might be added: A thinge so euident that Adamus Francisci (a learned Protestant writer) doth therefore acknowledge, how thatAdamus Francisci in Margarita theologica page 256. post med. saith: Commentum Papistarum de Transubstantiatione maturé in ecclesiam irrepsit. Transubstantiation entred early into the Church: so improperly (if not wilfully vntruly) is the foresaide example of the Laterane Councell, and Innocent the third vrged by Mr. Whitaker, and so many other of his brethren.
5 Fiftely Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Boniface the third, sayingWkitaker contra Duraeum. lib. 7. page 480. post medium. he that first intitled the Romane Church to be Caput omnium ecclesiarum, the head of all Churches was Boniface the third: Whereto we answere [Page 52] that although this point be for the matter thereof, alreadie answered by that which hath bene heretofore saide to the former examples of Victor, Zozimus Boniface, (the first) and Celestinus: yet to refell Mr. Whitaker euen in Terminis: whereas Boniface the third was Pope Anno. 607. that verie title of being Head is acknowledged, and giuen to the Romane Church by many FathersTheodor [...]e (though agretian) in epist. ad Renatum presbiterum saith of the Romane Church, tenet enim Sancta ista sedes gubernacula regenda rum cuncti orbis ecclesiarum. And in the Counsell of Calcedon act. 1. it is saide, and not contradicted, Papae vrbis Romae, quae est caput omnium Ecclesiarū, praecepta habemus. Greeke andProsper de in gratis c. 2. saith, sedes Roma petri quae Pastoralis honoris facta caput mundo &c. And Victor Vticensis de persecusione vandalica, l. 2. saith, praecipue ecclesia romana quae caput est omnium ecclesiarū: And Ennodius diaconus in libro de sinodis sub spiniacho habitis saith, sanctorum voce patet pontificū, dignitatem sedis apostolicae factam toto orbe venerabilem, dum illi quicquid fidelium est submittitur, dum totius corporis caput esse designatur: Vigilius Bishope of Rome in epist ad Euterum. c. 7. saith, Sancta Romana Ecclesia &c. Primatum tenet omnium Ecclesiarum, ad quam tam summa episcoporum negotia, & iudicia, atque quaerelae, quam & maiores Ecclesiarum quaestiones, quasi ad caput semper referenda sunt. Latin, who liued before those times: And Gregorie the greate predecessor to this Boniface, affirmeth in sundry places, thatGreg. l. 11. ep. 54. & in quartū Psalmum Paenitentialem. Romana Ecclesia est omnium Ecclesiarum caput: For and with which very title, theCentur. 6. c. 7. col. 425. line 38. & l. 41. & centur. 5. c. 7. col 774. line 53. Centurists do reprehend and expresly charge both him and sondry others that liued before Bonifacius tertius.
6 Sixtly Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Gregory the greate saying:Whitaker contra Duraeum l. 7. p 480. He that first deliuered Purgatorie for a certaine Doctrine was Gregorie the greate: whereto in Gregories full discharge from all Innouation in this pointe we answere, that S. Austine longe before Gregorie deliuereth the Doctrine thereof for most certaine saying:Aug. de verbis apost. serm. 34. saith, Orationibus vero sanctae Ecclesiae & sacrificio salutari & elemosinis quae pro eorum spiritibus erogantur, non est dubitandum mortuos adiuuari, vt cum eis miserecordius agatur a domino, quam eorum peccata meruerunt, hoc enim a patribus traditum vniuersa obseruat ecclesia. And in his booke de cura pro mortuis c. 1. he saith of praier for the dead, non parua est vniuersae ecclesiae quae in hac consuetudine claret authoritas. It is not to be doubted but that the dead are holpen by the Praiers of the holy Church, and the healthfull sacrifice, and almes which are imployed for their soules, that God will deale with them more mercifully then their sinnes deserued, for this doth the vniuersall Church obserue as deliuered from our forefathers: and els where he saith no lesse certainelyAug. in enchirid. c. 110. saith, neque negandū est defunctorū animas pietate suorū viuentiū releuari, cumpro illis sacrificiū mediatoris offertur it may not be denyed but that the soules of the deceassed are reliued by the pietie of their liuing [Page 53] frendes, when for them is offered the sacrifice of the mediator &c. In so much as he for the Latine Church doubted not toAug. haer. 35. saith, of Aërius, fertur quoque propria dogmata addidisse nonnulla, dicens orare vel offerre pro mortius oblationem, non oportere. censure Aërius for an hereticke, for his deniall of this Doctrine: as also Epiphanius for the Greeke Church, condemneth Aërius in like sort, saying against him in defence of praier & oblatiō for the dead,Epiphan. haer. 75. and ibidem versus finem. He further saith, Ecclesia necessario hoc perficit traditione a patribus accepta. The Church hath receaued (this) through the wide world, it was agreed vpon before Aërius was: Hence it is that Mr. Fulke confesseth and saithMr. Fulke in his aunswere to a Counterfeite Catholicke pa. 44. finem. Aërius taught that Praier for the dead was vnprofitable, as witnes both Epiphanius and Austine, which they coumpt for an error: Also he acknowledgeth thatMr. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatorie pa. 320. ante med. & p. 194. ante med. & pag. 326. initio. & 349. circa & post med. Ambrose, Chrisostome, and Austine allowed Praier for the dead, thatMr. Fulke vbi supra pa. 320. ante med. & pa. 326. initio. & 349. post med. & pa. 78. fine. it was the common error of their times: thatMr. Fulke vbi supra pa. 161. ante med. the error) of Purgatorie was some what rifely budded in Austines time, thatMr. Fulke vbi supra page 392. ante med. & vide ibidem p. 303. circa med. & 393. post med. Tertulian, Austine, Ciprian, Hierome, and a great, many more do witnes that sacrifice for the dead is the tradition of the Apostles. In like manner Mr. Gifford affirmeth, that euenMr. George Gifford in his Plaine demonstration that our Brownistes be full donatists &c. pag. 38. initio in the (Churches) publicke worshipe to praie for the soules of the dead, and to offer Oblation for the dead was generall in the Church long before the daies of Austine, as appeareth in Ciprian and Tertulian, which was before him and nearer to the time of the Apostles. Where-vnto might be added like testimonie from CaluineCaluin institut l. 3. c. 5. sect. 10 acknowledgeth that, ante mille & tre cent. Annos vsu receptum fuit vt precationes fierent pro defunctis (and a little after) sed fateor in errorē abrepti fuerunt &c. So cleare is Gregorie (who liued so many ages after these Fathers) discharged from all innouation in this point:
7 Seauenthly Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Innocentius the third, affirming thatMr. Whitaker contra Duraeum l. 7. pag. 480. post med. He was the first that instituted auriculer Confession for necessarie: whereto we answere that an Innouation so strange and compulsorie as for men (against all naturall shamefastnes) to be constrained to confesse their secret sinnes, could neuer haue bene brought in by mans only authority, without some open and greate contradiction: If therefore Innocentius first brought in this vsage before that time strange and vntaught, what Father [Page 54] or other writer of that age then resisted it? or who is witnes to this change? Herein Mr. Whitaker is silent. But to cleare Innocentius who was Pope about Anno. 1200. It is euident that the Iacobites were condemned Anno. 600. For affirming thatWitnes hereof Guido de Iacobit [...] c. 2. and Michaell Buchingerus in ecclesiastica, historia: And Matheus Parisius in Henrico tertio; and Iacobus Vitriacus historiae orientalis. c. 76. and Nicephorus l. 18. c. 45. we are to confesse our sinnes to God only and that Confession of sinnes to a Priest is not needfull. And Haymo Haimo in psal. 31. saith licet deus dimittat peccata &c. tamen confitendū est Ministris ecclesiae quia nisi confiterentur, ex sua inobediētia damnarentur; & no lesse plaine is hee (ad Euangeliū dominicae. 15. post pentecosten ite osten dite vos sacerdotibus. who liued about Anno. 790. expresseth the like agreeable Doctrine of the Church in his time: as also S. Bernard Bernard. in meditationibus c. 9. saith sed dicis sufficit mihi soli deo cōfiteri quia Sacerdos sine eo a peccatis me absoluere non potest; ad quod non ego sed beatus Iacobus respondet dicens, cōfitemini alte rutrū peccata vestra &c. And vide eum de interiori domo c. 37. Petrus Damianus and othersConcil. 2. Cabilonense (which was Anno. 813) can 32. saith, Sed & hoc emendatione egere perspeximus, quod quidam dum confitentur peccata sua Sacerdotibus non plenè id faciunt &c. And Alcuinus who liued Anno. 730. l. de diuinis officijs c. 13. in c. Ieiunij, saith. confiteatur omnia peccata sua quae recordare potest &c. quo facto fixis genibus in terram & super ipsa innixus stans suppliciter tensis manibus blando ac flexibili vultu respiciens sacerdotem, dicat &c. And see Aug. de visitatione infirmorum l. 2. c. 4. and l. 50. homiliarum hom. 49. c. 3. and Hospinianus in historia sacramentaria l. 4. pa. 366. circa med. reproueth the same Doctrine of Auriculer Confession, in Peter Lombard who (saith he) liued Anno. 1150. & also in Hugo de S. Victore who liued (saith he) about the yeare 1130. both of them before Innocēt the third. who all liued before Innocent the third, do the like for their times. To omitte that S. Basill affirmeth plainely that Confession isSee Basills words. hereafter tract 3. sect. 1 in the margent vnder the letter a. Necessarie: and that S. Leo affirmeth it to be ChristsSee the wordes of Leo hereafter tract 3. sect. 1. in the margent vnder the letter .a institution, teaching with all euenVide ibidem. secret Confession: Our aduersaries the centurie writersThe centurie writers cent. 3. c. 6. col. 127. l. 28. say, absolutionē deinde a peccatis ita conferebant, si qui paeenetentiam agebant, peccatum prius confessi essent: sic enim confessionē magnopere Tertulianus vrgent in libro de paenitentia; & vsitatam fuisse priuatam confessionem qua delicta & cogitata quoque praua confessi sunt, ex aliquot C [...]priani locis apparit, vt ex sermone quinto de lapsis, & l. 3 epistolarū, epistola 14. & 16. vbi diserte ait in minoribu [...] etiam pecca tis quae quidē non in deum committuntur, necesse est ad exomologesm venire, idque frequenter fierr inbet l. 1. epist. 3. &c. speaking of the auncient Churches vsage euen in those former times of Ciprian and Tertulian, do out of their writings most plainely collecte and set downe priuate Confession euen of thoughts and lesser sinnes: and that it was as then commaunded and thought necessarie. So greately is Mr. Whitaker mistaken in this example.Petrus Damianus: epist. 1. alleadgeth a notable example in proofe hereof: (& vide eum in serm. 2: de S. Andrea Apostolo) and concludeth aduising men not to deferre their confession. [Page 55] 8 Eightly Mr. Whitaker giueth example in Pope Nicholas the second, saying of himWhitaker contra Dureum l. 7. pa. 480. Qui primus docuit corpus Christi sensual [...]er tractari. fra [...]gi & dentibus atteri is Nicholaus secundus suit: Whereto we aunswere 1. First that the matter hereof is already sufficiently answered by that which hath bene heretofore saide concerning The fourth former example of Transubstantiation, and the confessed antiquitie thereof in many Fathers who liued long before this Pope Nicholas the second: 2. Secondly cōcerning the phrase (which is but a verball obiection) S. Chrisostome (many ages before Pope Nicholas) saide in like manner,Chrisostom in Math. hom. 83. post med. Ipsum vides, Ipsum tangis, Ipsum comedis: And else whereChrisostō in Iohn hom. 4 5. post med. Non se tantum videri permittet desiderantibus, sed & tangi & manducari & dentes carni sua infigi: And in what true and sober sence, these words may (in regardAs S. Paule in like regard saith, This is my Body which is broken for you 1. cor 11, 24. and Caluin de caena dom. inter opuscula saith in like manner, Iohn Baptist saith, he sawe the holy Ghost descending, of we looke narrowly, we shall finde he sawe nothing but a Doue &c. Yet because hee knewe that vision to be &c. a most certaine signe of the presence of the Holy Ghost, he bouldely affirmeth that he sawe him &c. As the holy Ghost is in regard of this foresaid presence saide to be seene and to descend: so may Christs Body in regard of it like presence in the Sacrament be likewise saide to be handled, broken, &c. of Christs Body Really present in the Sacrament) be vsed, is at large affirmed by our aduersaries the Lutheranes, who doubt not specially toIacobus Andraeas in confut. disput. Iohan. Iacobi Grinaei pa. 214. ante med. saith, quomodo autem corpus Christi in hoc sacramento dentibus teri, videri, tangi, dicatur, quae non á Luthero recens inuentae & in ecclesiam introductae, sed eruditae, piae, & orthodoxae vetustatis phrazes sunt, &c. Luculenter explicatum est. And page 215. post medium. Hee saith: Haec Berengario á Papa Nicholao & sinodo praescripta pallinodia nihil continet, quod inscriptis orthodoxorū Patrum, Chrisostomi in primis non continetur: & vide page 306. And of Luthers like allowance and defence of Pope Nicholas herein, vide ibidem page 307. initio. & fine. And so the booke entituled apologia modesta ad acta conuentus quindecem theol. torgae nuper habit page 36. post medium. defend against their other brethren our aduersaries, this very obiection concerning Pope Nicholas.
9 Ninthly and lastly (for we will not in this our discourse which toucheth only Rome, be tediouse in rehearsing Mr. Whitakers other vntrue and impertinent examples concerning other Churches or Bishopes,) Mr. Whitaker (for wante of greater matter) chargeth Pope Calixtus thatWhitaker contra Duraeum l. 7. pag. 480. he was the first that ordeined [Page 56] Ieiunium quatuor temporum where-vnto for so much as this auncient Pope was the imediate successor (next but one) to Victor, we answere as heretofore did the Lord Archbishope of Canterbury concerning Victor saying:Se hertofore tract 1. sect 7 letter r. By this you add more credit to the cause then you are aware of: &c. And seeming that Mr. Whitaker can alleadge no auncient writer charging Calixtus with Innouation herein, the example therfore and authoritie of so auncient a Father, doth not so much impugne as giue credit to this appointed fast, so as further answere herevnto is needlesse.
Mr. Whitaker hauing thus failed in euery one of those examples whereof he made boulde to giue instance, and the Romane Church being found therein free from all supposed change or Innouatiō: how much the rather now are we to esteeme it no lesse cleared from change in those other so many & greate Doctrines, whereof he is not able to aforde so much as colour of instance to the contrarie? his apparent want in that behalfe being such as enforced him for shew of varietie, to giue (as before) seuerall examples concerning one & the same question, as namely concerning the Blessed Sacrament, and the Popes foresaide Primacie. In all which neuerthelesse he had so little trust and did so well fore knowe the discouerable weakenes thereof, that he else where protesteth plainely that he and his breethrenMr. Whitaker l. 3. contra Duraeum pag. 277. ante med. And Bucanus in loc. comun. pag. 466. saith: non est nostrum designare quo temporis momento experit ecclesia deficere &c. are not bound to answere in what age Superstition crepte into the Church, and thatMr. Whitaker l. 7. contra Duraeum pag. 477. post med. it is not needfull for them to search out in histories the beginning of this change: And for that in deed he right well knewe that he could not shew the same, therefore quite against his owne former examples, and in proofe that it cannot be shewed, he alleageth similitudes ofWhitaker contra Camp. [...]at. 7. pag. 101. & 102. the haires of a mans head which waxe not whit sodainly, but by degree not to bee discerned: and ofWhitaker contra Camp. ibidem. slifters entring into a building, at first not to be perceaued. &c. and so with deceiptfull [Page 57] andDeceiptfull and misaplied in many respects: As 1 In that the haires, nor somuch as any one haire of a mans head are instantly at the first become white at changed. Neither doth euery first beginning of decay in buildings at the first become an outward & markeable ruine, wheras in Doctrine euery opinion is at the first either true or false: 2 Secondly the first whitnes of some few haires, and the first decay in buildinges cannot be at the first discerned, though they were precisely regarded, which is otherwise in change of Doctrine: 3 Thirdly none is specially charged so preciselie to marke these, whereas on the contrary, it is the special charge not of a fewe, but of all the Churches Pastors not only to marke but also publickly to withstand the other. misaplied resemblances, laboureth to perplex and sophisticate his readers Iudgement, wherin to beare with his bouldenes, and to admitte (for the time) his saide similituds for pertinēt, yet is al this vnable to relieue our aduersaries: for though we should be sparing herevpon to charge thē with shewing the first begīning of so great a chang as is by thē imagined (which is all that by these foresaide-misaplied resemblances, our aduersaries do wrongefully vrge) neuerthelesse at the least yet, we are in all reason to expect, that (according to the nature of these their owne examples)For though the first whit haire or slifter be not discerned, yet the further degrees & increase thereof are markeable & discerned. they should discouer and describe to vs some proceedings and increase of this supposed chaunge: If therefore they say that this change was not made all at once, but by little and little, some times in one pointe of faith, some times in an other, then are they accordingly to shew forth those seuerall little changes or some degrees of the increase and proceedinges therof. As what be those seuerall points of faith so by degrees at seuerall times changed, which bee the Popes that were agentes therin, & who be the fathers that impugned the same &c. In this sort (to omitte the like inSarauia in defensione tractationis de diuersis ministrorum gradibus. cap. 23. p. 362. initio. saith vpon like occasion, respondeo id dici non fat esse, sed ex historijs demonstrā dum esse quae illa fuerint schismata, & vbi & quando nata, & quomodo inde tam vniuersalis consuetudo fuerit profecta: And see him further, ibidem pag. 429. initio. D. Sarauia) doth the L. Archbishope of Canterburie defendingMr. VVhitgifte in his defence &c. pag. 747. initio. Cathedrall Churches against Mr. Carthwright,Mr. VVhitgifte ibidem. demaunde accordingly of him: from what Pope they came or in what time they were first inuented: Affirming withall (else where) against the Puritanes thatSee heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. l. m. num. 13. for so much as the originall and beginning of these names Metropolitaines Archbishope &c. cannot be founde, it is (therefore) to bee supposed, that they had their originall from the Apostles, for (saith he) S. Austine hath this rule &c. In defence wherof [Page 58] he further alleagethSee heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. l. n. num. 14. sondry Protestant writers: And hence like-wise it is, that S. Hierome doubteth not to teach, thatHierom ad clitesi phontem. to reduce an heresie to it beginning is a confuting thereof, the truth of which his assertion Mr. WhitakerVVhitaker contra duraeum l. 7. pag. 479. paulo post med. saith, multum autem ad haereses refutandas conferre, earum originē nosse nemo negat. acknowledgeth.
This point therefore is not our only assertion or vrging, but is also yet further grounded vpon the confessed sence of scriptures, which teach thatSee hereafter Tract. 2. cap. 2. Sect. 1. z. a. b. d. Pastors and Doctors must be alwaies in the Church: and thatHereafter Tract. 2. ca. 2. sect. 1. l. 1. & ibidē l. p. q. r. they shall not be silent: but shallSee hereafter tract. 2. ca. 2. Sect. 1. l. p. alwaies resist all false opinions with open reprehension: The office also and nature of the Church argueth no lesse, for how can she be the true Church, and yet suffer so many and important errors as are pretended to invade her children without resistance vpon her part? the experience likewise of all former times is answerable herevnto, for in this sort haue the olde Heresies of the Graetians and Lattines bene discouered, andSee this at large in the seueral treatises of Ireneus, Epiphanius, Theodoret Augustine, Damascene, &c. written purposely by thē against haeresies: contradicted: In this sorte were of later times, Berengarius, Waldo, Wicliffe, Luther, &c. Euer at their first arising contradicted and charged with Innouation. In this sorte lastly is the defectiō or change in Doctrine heretofore made by the1 First, concerning the defection of the Greeke Church, the more auncient examples thereof in Paulus samosetanus, macedonius, Nestorius &c. are so memorable as further testimonie thereof needeth not. 2 Secondly as concerning the seuerall defections for later times of the Greeke Church from the Romane, they are testified by Nicephorus, Zonoras, Clycas, Hunbertus against Nicetas, and others. And in part by some Protestants, as namely by Crispinus in his discourse of the estate of the Church pag. 364. fine. & 253. initio. And by Osiander in his Epitom. Centur 9. 10. 11 &c. p. 144. circa med. & 156. post med. & 261. fine. & 262. fine. & by Mr. Sparke against M. Iohn de Albines p. 158 And by Keckermanus in Sistem theolog. l. 1. pag. 68. & 69. Twelue times or there aboutes hath the Greeke Church reconciled it selfe to Rome, and afterwardes fallen from thence being thereupon now at last wholly opressed with barbarouse turcisme. 3 Thirdly as concerning the seuerall errors (fewe in comparison) wherein the Greeke Church at this day dissenteth from the Romane: theire beginning and contradiction is notoriouse: As for example their deniall of subiection to the Romane sea was begune by Iohn of Constantinople and he therevpon specially contradicted by Gregorie the Greate l. 4. ep. 34. & 36. & l. 7. ep. 36. & 64. and by Pellagius in his epistle, vniuersis Episcopis qui illicita vocatione Ioannis Constantinop. ad sinodum conuenerunt. Also their deniall of praier for the dead. was begunne by Aerius and contradicted in him by Austine haer. 53. and by Epiphanius haer 75. And yet afterwards in both these doctrines they conformed them selues to Rome, as is reported by Mr. Sparke vbi supra. and by Osiander cent. 15. page 477. and by Crispinus vbi supra pag. 451. In like manner theire defence of mariage of Priestes was contradicted against Theodorus by Chrisostom. in epist. 6. ad Theodorum Monachum: and against certaine other by Epiphanius haer. 59. ante med. Also their deniall of the holy ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne was begunne and gaine saide about Anno 764 as witnesseth our aduersarie Keckermanus in sistem. theolog. pag. 68. the deniall of vnleauened bread in celebration of the Sacrament was begunne about Anno Domni 1053 as appeareth by Leo the .9. in epst. ad Michaelem Episcopum Constantinop. c. 5. and by Osiander cent. 11. page 156. post med. And by the centurie writers cent. 11. c. 8. Like example might be giuen of their other, but few and lesser errors. the which Anno Domini 870. consist (as appeareth by testimonie of Chrispinus in his discourse of the estate of the Church page 253. initio) but only in the Primacie and the diuersitie of Ceremonies All which notwithstanding they do vehemently professe to detest the Protestants religion, as appeareth by the two seuerall treatises translated lately into lattine, the one made by Hieremias Patriarch of Constantinople, the other entituled responsio Ioan [...]s Basilij magni ducis Muscouiae &c. Anno 1570. And published and replied vnto by Ioannes Lasicius a Protestant writer of Poland, and extant in the booke intituled de Russorum Muscouitarum & Tartarorum religione &c. printed 1582. And it appeareth in the treatise set forth euen by the Protestant diuines of witteberg, entitled acta theologorum witebergensium & Hieremia Patriarchae constantinop. de Augustana confessione &c. Printed witeberga Anno 1584 that the Greeke Church yet to this day professeth and teacheth Inuocation of Saintes and Angells (pag. 55. fine. 102. ante med. & 128. initio) Reliques (pag. 243. fine. & 368. post med.) worshipping of Images, (pag. 243. initio 244. circa & post med. 247. ante med. & 251. fine) Transubstantiation (pag. 86. initio 96. initio. 100. circa med. 240. post med. & 318.) Sacrifice (pag. 102. & 104. post med.) The signifying Caeremonies of the Masse: pag. 97. Circa med. And see the marginall note thereupon. And pag. 99. & 100. Auricular Confession in prefat. ante med & in libro pag. 87. initio. & 130. post med. Enioyned satisfaction: pag. 79. & 89. post med. Confirmation with Chrisme: (pag. 78. initio. & 238. fine.) Extreame vnction: (pag. 242. initio & 326. ante med.) And all the seauen Sacraments (pag. 77. Circa med. & 242. Also Praier for the dead page 93. post med. 102. ante med. & 109. post med. Sacrifice for the dead: page 95. circa med. & 104. post med. Almes for the dead. page 93. post med. & 109. circa med. Freewill page 224. circa med. 296. ante med. & 367 circa med. Monachisme: page 132 ante med. & 257. ante med. Vowes of chastitie: page 111. circa med. & 129. post med. & 135 post med. The fast of Lent and other sett fasting daies page 126 fine. That Priestes may not Marry after orders taken: page 129. circa med. and lastly (to omitt many other) that the tradition and doctrine of the Fathers is to be kept page 131 fine 138. initio & 142. so plainely in all these chiefe points doth the greeke Church yet to this day remaine vnchanged. GREEKE CHVRCH to vs (though in comparison strangers thereto) at this day yet discouerable. And coulde then our home neighbour Rome, only Rome, caste of her primatiue faith, and in liew thereof set abroach pretended errors, [Page 58] not few but many, not small but of importance not of beleefe only but also of practize (as praier for the dead: Praier to Saintes: Pilgrimage. Vowed Chastitie: Monachisme: Offering of externall sacrifice to God. and aboue [Page 59] all (to omitte many other) the externall adoring (as protestants thinke of Bread and Wine for God,) neither keepe these priuate to her selfe, but therewithal infect so many Christian NationsNappeire vpon the reuelations. page 68. Reignening vniuersally: and all this as Mr. Napeire confesfethNappeire ibidem. without anie debateable contradiction Ibidem page 239. ante med. neuer suffering for the space of a 1000. yeares after Siluester the first, (nor before for any thing that is alleadged, so much as) any to be seene vouchable or visible of the true Church to match or encounter her: (whereas yet our aduersaries them selues, do acknowledge and reporteReported at large by the centurie writers in the fifthe Chapter of their seuerall Centuries of euerie age. the confessed and knowne heretickes who in euery of the foresaid ages, haue in other points openly and bouldely contradictedThis is testified by the centurie writers vbi supra and by the other ecclesiasticall writers of euery age: and see hereafter tra. 2. c. 2. sect. 9. l. 2. the ROMANE Church) And though we shoulde suppose all this so strangely to haue hapned, coulde yet so great and strange a wonder but so much as in that one foresaide example ofWheras our aduersaries pretend that Honorius the third who was Pope Anno. 1220. did first bring in the adoration of the Sacrament: it is a meere fiction, for no writer of that age did gainesay or so much as charge him with Innouation therein, onely he did ordaine that Priestes should admonish the people against theire ne [...]ligence in that behalfe. Before this Honorius Odo Parisiensis, who liued. 1175. (in synodicis constitutionibus cap. 5. de sacram. Altaris) saith in like maner: Frequenter moneantur Laici, vs vbicunque viderint deferri Corpus Domini, statim genua [...]ectant tanquam Domino & creatori suo, & iunctis manibus quoadusque transierint orent: also Algerus Anno Domini. 1060. l. de sacram. Eucharist l. 2. c. 3. fine. saith, Hac fide ipsū sacramentum quasi diuinum quiddam & rationabile alloquimur, & rogamus: Agnus dei qui tollis peccata mundi miserere nobis, quia non quod videtur, sed quod verè est, Christum ibi esse credimus. Also Antonius Praetorius a learned Caluinist in libro de sacramentis pa. 288. prope initium: Telling how Damascene taught Transubstantiation, with all further saith Anno. 735. Subse [...] est Panis adoratio, ac si ipse Christus esset. And so accordingly Carion in his Chronic. (pag. 451. prope initium, doth not only charge Damascene most expresly with transubstantiation, but doth also (ibidem pag. 476. circa med. & 477. paulo ante med.) place Artolatria. That is to say (saith he) the odoration of the reserued and eluated Bread (sequentibus Annis quingentis &c.) within the second fiue hundreth yeares after Christ. By which only premisses as it is cleare and confessed that adoration of the sacrament was vsed long before the time of Honorius the third. So also it is as euident and confessed by Protestantes, and namely by Mr. Foxe (act mon. pag. 896. b. fine. and after the aedition of Anno 1596. pag. 1276. a. line 14.) that if this Honorius did not beginne the same, the first beginning thereof, is then so sarr from being found, that we cannot (saith Mr. Foxe) finde it to come in by any other: Add but now here-vnto the aunswerable testimonies of Austine in Psalm. 98. of Ambrose de spiritu Sancto l. 3. c. 12. of Theodoret dial. 2. of Chrisostome in 1. cor. hom. 24. of Basill de spiritu Sancto cap. 27. of Nazianzen, in Epitaph Gorgoniae, and of Dionisius Areopagita, de Eccles. Hierach. c. 3. which are so plaine and agreeable with our externall adoration of Christ in the Sacrament, that our aduersari [...] Chemnitius doth for such alleadge sondry of them against our aduersaries the sacramentaries (in his examen Concil. Trident part. 2. p. 92.) adoring the sacrament for God, (much more in so many other pointes of faith) haue bene so brought and devulged into so many Christian Nations nere and remote, and not once testified or remembred, so much as by any one of the Churches enimies neither hereticall nor prophane: were the Churches owne pastors, her home enimies and strangers to her Religion all of them silent herein,
THAT CATHOLICKES ARE ABLE TO proue the contrary euen by Testimonie of the learned Protestants. § 8
AND although the proofe of the ROMANE Churches supposed change of her religion lying on our aduersaries part, and hitherto wanting, might be matter in this behalfe sufficient to offer vnto your HIGHNES learned Iudgment; yet will we our selues in surplusage exhibit futher demonstratiō of her not change in any needefull article of faith, by manifest testimonie from our learned aduersaries: First then it is heretofore fully proued by euident confession of the learned Protestants (aswell in generall,This is fullie confessed heretofore Tract 1. Sect 1 paulo post initium, and Mr. Fulke in his answere to a counterfaite Catholicke pag. 36. initio. affirmeth also that, the religion of the Papists, came in and preuailed in the yeare of our Lord 607. as also concerning euery point of faith in perticuler)This is hertofore proued Tract. 1. Sect. 1. in the margent at the letter d. that in the time of Gregorie the great Bishope of Rome, the Romane Church professed our now Catholicke, or (as they terme it) Popishe faith; and that shee hath perseuered in profession thereof euer since that time, is confessed likewise by our aduersaries, and made so euident by all histories as that to vndertake further proofe thereof were [Page 61] tediousnes bothConfessed hertofore tract 1. sect. 2. in the margent at the letter l. and also at this marke *. And Mr. Fulke in his aunswere to a counterfaite Catholicke pag. 27. circa med. speaking of Boniface the third who was Bishope of Rome the 2 yeare after the death of Gregorie the greate (teste Anastasio l. de vitio Pontificum) saith the Popes from Boniface the 3. were all blasphemous haeretickes & Antichristes: And he affirmeth the same in his confutation of Purgatorie pag. 344. post med. And he likewise affirmeth Boniface the third to be Antichrist, and that vnder him The Papistes religion preuailed (in his foresaid aunswere to a Counterfaite Catholicke pag. 36. and in his confutation of Purgatorie pa. 194. paulo post med. & vide Whitakerum l. de Ecclesia pa. 260. fine. & 261. improper and needelesse. ThisThis is manifestly affirmed and collected from the Ecclesiasticall writers of euery age, and by our aduersaries the Centurie writers, in euery of their seuerall Centuries. Gregorie liued somwhat within the first 600. yeares after Christ, so that hauing now hereby already proued the continued profession of the Romane Church in our now taught Catholicke faith for all these last thousand yeares: The only difficultie and doubt least to be examined, is whether that shee did make change of her faith, during these other foresaid first 600 yeares next after Christ.
This being the maine pointe or issue of this present controuersie, we will now first examine for how many hundreth yeares next after Christ, the Church of Rome is confessed to haue perseuered with-out reuolt or chang in the faith first to her deliuered: In discouery whereof, whereas our writers do obiect, how that Tertullian prouoked the heretickes of his time with the succession of the Romane Bishopes, Mr. D. Fulke aunswering thereto affirmeth the reason thereof to be, for that (saith he)Mr. Fulke in his confutation of Purgatory p. 374. post med. The Church of Rome reteined by succession vntill Tertullians dayes that faith which it did first receaue of the Apostles: With whome agreeth herein Mr. D. WhitakerWhitaker de Ecclesia pa. 278. post med. speaking of certaine Apostolicke Churches, & emongst them of Rome by name: saith, vnde intelligimus cur ad illas Ecclesias prouocaret Tertullianus, nimirum quia tum Doctrinā Apostolicam perpetua successione tenebant. and HieromeZanchius de vera relig. p. 148. circa med. Zanchius and where one of our writers vrgethIn Mr. Fulkes confutation of purga. p. 372. ante med. the succession of the Romane Bishopes by example of Ireneus, Ciprian, Tertullian, Optatus, Hierome, Austine, and Vincentius Lirinensis, Mr. Fulke aunswereth thereto saying,Ibidem p. 373. paulo ante med. that these men specially named the Church of Rome. It was because the Church of Rome at that time, as it was founded by the Apostles, so it continued in the Doctrine of the Apostles. And Mr. D. Rainoldes being prouoked in the same kinde acknowledgeth in [Page 62] like manner thatMr. D. Rainoldes in his conferēce with M. Harte pa. 442. post med. the succes [...]ion of the Romane Bishopes was a proofe of the true faith in the time of Austine, Epiphanius, Optatus, Tertullian, and Ireneus &c. And the like acknowledgment or aunswere thereto, is made by many otherRidley in Mr. Foxe actes and Monuments p. 1359. b. circa med. saith, The Patriarche of Rome in the Apostles time, & longe after was a greate maintainer & setter forth of Christs glory in the which aboue all other Countries and Regions was Preached the true ghospell, the sacraments were most duly administred &c. After the Emperors became Christians the ghospell there florished most: And Mr. Iuell in his reply to M. Harding pa. 246. ante med. saith, Aswell S. Austine as also other godly fathers right lie yeelded reuerence to the sea of Rome &c. For the puritie of religion which was there preserued a longe time without spo [...]. And pag. 628. paulo post med. he further saith, the godly Fathers (of those fore saide times) sought to the Church of Rome, which then for puritie in religion, and constancie in the same was most famouse aboue all others. learned Protestants: only we will conclude with Caluin, who setteth downe our foresaide allegation saying of vsCaluin institut l. 4. c. 2. sect. 2. saith Magnifice illi quidem suam nobis Ecclesiam comendant: allegant enim [...]am apud se initio sana Doctrina & sanguine Martirum bene fundatam, perpetua Episcoporum successione conseruatam fuisse ne intercideret; commemorant quanti hanc successionem fecerunt, Ireneus, Tertullianus, Origenes, Augustinus, & alij. They in deede sett forth their Church to vs very gloriously &c. They reporte out of Ireneus, Tertullian, Origen, Augustine and others, how highly they esteemed this succession: Whereto he then aunswereth and giueth his like reason thereof, saying,Cum extra controuersiam esset nihil a principio vsque ad illam aetatem mutatum fuisse in Doctrina, sumebant quod omnibus nouis erroribus conficiendis sufficeret, illos opugnare Doctrinam ab ipsis vsque Apostolis constanter & vnanimi assensu retentam. (Caluin vbi supra l. 4 cap. 2. sect. 3.) Considering it was a matter out of all doubt that from the beginning euen vntill that time, nothing was changed in Doctrine, the (fore-saide) holy Doctors tooke in argument that which was sufficient for the ouerthrowing of all new errors, (to witte) that they (viz. the heretickes) oppugned the Doctrine which euen from the very Apostles them selues had bene inuiolablie and with one consent reteined: And in his booke of Institutions set forth in French he saith expresly thatCaluin in his institutions in French Printed at Gaeneua by Corradus Badius, Anno. 1562. saith, C'estoyt vne chose notoire & sans doubte, que depuis L'ange des Apostres, iusques a lour temps, il ne S'estoit fait nul. Changement de Doctrine, ny a Rome [...]y aux autres villes. It was a thing notoriouse & without doubt, that after the Apostles age vntill those (fore-said) times, no change was made in Doctrine neither at Rome nor at other Citties: So plainely do our learned aduersaries acknowledge that no change of faith was made by [Page 63] the Romane Church from the Apostles age vntill the times of Saint Austine, Epiphanius, Optatus &c. Which was for foure hundreth and fortie yeares after Christ.
The Church of Rome being then thus cleared from all change of Doctrine (at the least concerning any needfull article of faith which is the only point now pertinent and questionable) during aswell the first 440. yeares after Christ, as also the other thousand yeares now last past. There remaineth only to be examined, the interim of those 160. yeares which passed betweene the saide first 440. and the saide other last 1000. yeares; in which meane time, if no such supposed change was, then doth it hereof vnauoidably follow that as the Church of Rome at first receaued and professed the right faith, so likewise she doth yet still to this day continew and preserue the same.
The matter being as then (euen from the testimonies of our learned aduersaries) made thus issuable, and plainely deduced to this certainety or narrow compasse of time: we haue here often prouoked thē to giue example or instance of this their supposed change in the Romane Church during the saide meane time of 160. yeares. In full discouery of which point, we will breifly vrge three speciall reasons next ensuing: As First seeing the scriptures do witnes to vs aswel that Christ hath placed in his ChurchEphes. 4, 11, 12, 13. Pastors and Doctors, (to continew) to the consummation of Saints, vntill we all meete in the vnitie of faith, euen as our aduersaries do here-vpon expounde)Mr. Fulke against the Remish testament in Ephes 4. fol. 335. a. initio. And Caluin institut. (Printed Geneuae 1550.) c. 8. de fide. sect. 37, 38. p. 233. 234. & melancthon in loc. Comun. (Printed 1561.) c. de Ecclesia. for euer: as also that theseEsay. 62, 6. watchmen orSee the margi. notes of the English Bible of Anno 1576. in Esay 62, 6. Pastors Esay 62, 6. shall not be silent, but shall (as Mr. Fulke confesseth)Mr. Fulk in his aunswere to a counterfaite Catholicke pa. 11. initio. alwaies resist all false opinion (euen)Mr. Fulke ibidem pa. 92. ante medium. with open reprehension which thing is also other-wise most euident, in that by the Iudgment of all menSee this confessed hereafter tract 2. c. 1. sect. 6. in the margent at the letter m. & tract 1. c. 2. sect 13. in the margent at the letter r. Christes true [Page 64] Church must euer continew, but the true Church she neither is nor can be, if she faile so much in dutie, as to suffer so many supposed errors to assaulte & inuade her Children, without some open defence and resistance to the contrarie: Therefore so many and so important Doctrines, as Merit of workes, Praier for the dead, Praier to Saints, Free-will, Reall presence, Adoration of Christ in the sacrament, Sacrifice of the Masse, The vnmaried life of Priestes, and so many other moe such like, could neuer (supposing they were errors) haue in so small a compasse as of those saide 160. yeares, bene brought to haue bene as then begunne and publickly professed by the Romane Church, without greate difficultie of resistance and open reprehension of some one or other Godly man in some parte of the true Church. The examplesThese examples are yet extant, and to be found in Ireneus in libro aduersus haereses. And in Epiphanius and Augustine in their seuerall bookes against haeresies. aswell of the times then precedent wherein were so contradicted but for some one or other seuerall opinion. The Valētinians, Tatianists, Manichees, Arianes, &c. As also of the ages then subsequent, in which were in like sorte contradicted the seuerallThese examples are collected out of the Fathers of euery of those ages by the Protestant writers, as namely by the Centurie writers in their fifte Chapter of euery seuerall Centurie: See also Pantaleon in his Chronologie, and Osiander in his seueral centuries. other heresies of euery age, and all yet to this day manifouldly recorded, giue plentifull demonstration herein. The like examples also of the very foresaide 160. yeares now in question afforde no lesse euidence hereof, for euen as then were contradicted for their seuerall opinions to vs, yet at this day discerned and knowne not only theAug. l. de haeresibus ad quod uultdeum haer. 88. Pelagianes, Aug. ibidem haer. 91. Nestorians, Aug. ibidem haer. 69. Donatists Sexta sinod. Constantinop. and see Centur. 6. col. 311. line 37. Monothelites &c. But also (which argueth this matter most inuinciblie and clearely for vs and against our aduersaries) sondry heretickes for theire then priuate and singular denying (as protestants now do) sondry points of our now professed Catholicke faith. The vndoubted examples whereof, are many and by our very aduersaries acknowledged: So euen in or (which is more stronge) nexte before the beginning of the saide 160. yeares [Page 65] was (as is confessed) the deniall of praier and offering sacrifice for the dead & of our appointed fasts condemned as singuler inHereof see Aug. haer. 53. and Epiphanius haer. 75. ante med. And Mr. Fulke in his aunswere to a Counterfaite Catholicke pag. 44. fine. & 45. initio. Confesseth this saying, I will not dissemble that which you thinke the greatest matter, Aerius taught that Praier for the dead was vnprofitable as witnes both Epiphanius and Austine, which they coumpt for an error: Also he taught that fasting daies are not to be obserued: And see this confessed in like manner by Pantaleon in Chronographia pag. 28. initio. Aërius. So also was the deniall of praier to Saints and worshipping of Saints Relickes condemned likewise as then inHierom contra Vigilantium c. 2. &. 3. And Mr. Fulke confesseth this likewise, vbi supra pag. 46. paulo ante med. saying, Last of all Vigilantius shall be brought in who wrote against Inuocation of Saints, superstition of Relickes, and other Caeremonies, him Hierome reproueth. & vide centur. 4. col. 1250. line 45. And Osiander in epitom. cent. 4. l. 4. pag. 506. ante med. And see this further confessed by Crispinus in his discourse of the estate of the Church pag. 131. post med. Vigilantius: In the same times were condēned in like manner the deniall of Images inFunctius (a Protestant writer) in libro 7. Comentariorum in precedent. Chronologiam. At Anno. Christi 494. confesseth saying, Porro is xenayas primus in Ecclesia bellum contra imagines excitauit: And Nicephorus in hist. Eccles. l. 16. c. 27. saith, Xenayas iste primus (o audacem animam & os impudens) vocem illani euomuit, Christi & corum qui illi placuere imagines venerandas non esse. And see also hereof Cedrenus in compendio histor. Xenayas and the deniall of voluntarie pouertie and monasticall profession inHierome contra Vigilantium prope finem saith, quod autem asseris cos melius facere qui vtuntur rebus suis & paulatim fructus possessionum suarum pauperibus diuidunt, quám illos qui possessionibus venundatis semel omnia largiuntur; non a me cis sed a Domino respondebitur si vis esse perfectus, vade & vende omnia quae habes & da Pauperibus & veni, sequere me. Ad eum loquitur qui vult esse perfectus &c. iste quem tu laudas, secundus & tertius gradus est, quem & nos recipimus dummodo seramus prima secundit & tertijs preferenda; nec á suo studuo monachi deterrendi sunt á te lingua [...]perea & morsu saeuissimo, de quibus argumentaris & dicis, si omnes se clauserint & fuerint in solitudine, quis caelebrabit Ecclesias, &c. And see this plainely confessed by Crispinus in his booke of the estate of the Church pag. 131. and 132. Vigilantius & others.In like manner is Ianuarius for this like Doctrine reproued by S. Austine serm. 49. ex diuersis cap. 1. and Instus is for the same reproued by Gregorie l. 4. dial. c. 55. And see further hereof Leo ep. 92. ad rusticum. And concil. Chalcedon cap. 7. and Austine ep. 89. ad Hillarium and Chrisostom l. aduersus vit [...]peratores vitae monasticae. The deniall of the power of Priestes to remitt sinnes in theSee this hereafter Tract. 3. Sect. 1. in the margent at the letter x. Nouatians: The deniall of freewill & of remission of sinnes and grace conferred in Baptisme in theHierom in proaem. librorum aduersus Pelagianos fine. saith, Manichaeorum est hominum damnare naturam, & liberum auferre arbitrium. & dei adiutorium: And see Hierom in explan. symb. ad damasum. And S. Austine de fide contra manich. c. 9. saith, Aduersus haec solita caecitate manichaei latr [...]nt, & cum conuincuntur naturam non esse malum, sed in potestate esse hominis facere bené aut male, dicunt non esse animae liberam voluntatem, & non vident cae [...]tatem suam &c. & vide ibidem cap. 10. & in actis cum faelice manichaeo l. 2. cap. 4. And Chrisostom in Iohn hom. 45. prope initium saith, Christ saide to them, no man can come to me, except the Father who sent me drawe him: Here at the Manichees do rise vp contending by testimony of this scripture that we can do nothing of our selues &c. But this taketh not awaie our freewill, but sheweth that we neede Gods helpe. And concerning the other point touching Baptisme, Mr. Whitaker l. 10. contra Duraeum pa. 883. confesseth the same saying: Nos in Baptismo peccata remitti & gratiam conferri credimus ac docemus, quod negare soliti sunt Manichaei, ergo nos á Manichaeis alienisumus, & vide sarcerium loc. comun. tom. 1. de Baptismo fol. 232. b. post medium. [Page 66] Manichees The deniall of the necessitie of Childrens Baptisme in theInnocentius in rescripto ad mileuitanum conciliū post med. saith of the Pelagians, illud vero quod vestra fraternitas cos asserit predicare, paruulos aeternae vitae praemijs absque Baptismatis gratia posse donari, perfatuum est: In like plaine manner is this poine condemned in the Pelagians by S. Austine haer. 88. & contra Iul. Pelag. l. 6. c. 7. & de pecc. mer. & rem. l. 2. c. 9. & 27. and by S. Leo. ep. 86. ad Episcopum Aquiliensem. Pelagianes The deniall of the Blessed Sacramēts reseruation in theCirrill ad Calosyrium sayth. I heare they say that the misticall blessing, If any remnants therof do remaine till the nexte day following is vnprofitable to sanctification, but they are mad in so saying, for Christ is not made an other, neither shall his body be changed but the vertue of blessing and liuely grace doe alwaies remaine in it. This pointe is so plaine and confessed that Peter Martir) aduersus Stephans Gardeneri librum de Eucharistia printed Basilea Anno 1581 obiect. 213. col. 838. post med. saith of this saying of Cirrill: Quod autem subijcitur Eucharistia reliquias asseruatas in chrastinum diem a sanctificatione non cessare, spectat opinor ad receptam quanaam consuetudinem. (&c.) ea consuetudo etsi saperet nonnihil superstitionis, tamen illi Cirrillus ali (que) subscribebant: statim enim a temporibus Apostolorum paulatim caeptum est degenerar [...] ab illa veteri simplicitate diuini cultus. Anthropomorphites The deniall of the single & vnmaried life of Priests inHierom contra Vigilantium c. 1. condemneth this doctrine in Vigilantius saying hereof against him. Quid faciunt Orientis Ecclesiae, quid aegipti & sedis Apostolica, quae aut virgines clericos accipiunt, aut continentes, aut si vxores habuerint mariti esse desinunt. Vigilantius, See Hierom. l. 1. contra Iouin. c. 19. & 14. & ad Pamahium apol. c. 8. Iouinian andEpiphanius haer. 59 ante med. saith. At dices mihi omnino in quibusdam locis, adhuc liberos gignere & Presbiteros & Diaconos & Hypodiaconos wherto he aunswereth) at hoc non est iuxta Canonem, sed iuxta hominum mentem &c. And see Siritius in epist. ad Himerium Tarraconensim. c. 6. & 7. others. The deniall of enioyned times of penance in the heretickes calledTheodoret l. 4. haer. & fab. de Audianis. reproueth them saying deinde confessis &c. They giue remission to such as are Confessed without prescribing time for Penance as the lawes of the Church Commaunde. Audiani: The deniall of the diuersitie [Page 67] of Merittes inAug. de tempore serm. 191. saith, Iouiniani damnamus errorem, qui dicit nullam in futuromeritorum distantiā And Hierom l. 1. aduersus Iouin. c. 2. reproueth Iouinian for that he taught that Mariage and Virginity were (Eiusdem Meriti) of aequall meritt, confessed by Pantaleon in Chronographia pag. 32. And S. Ambrose and others say against Iouinian: Agrestis vlulatus est &c. Promiscue velle omnia confundere &c. diuersorumque gradus abrogare meritorum. hereof see further Concil. Tolense. & rescriptum Ambrosij ibidem & aliorum ad Siritium prope initium. I [...]uinian: The deniall of the Commaundements being possible in certaine otherHierom in explanat. symb. ad Damasum saith, Execramur Blasphemiam eorum qui dicunt impossibile aliquid hominia Deo praeceptum esse &c. And the same words hath Austine, de tempore serm. 191. & vide Hieronimum ad Cleantium and Concil. 2. Arausican Can. 25. heretickes of those times. The deniall of Exorcisme and Exufflation vsed in Baptisme was condemned like-wise inAug. de nuptijs & concupiscentia l. 2. c. 29. saith, Iulianus Antiquissimam Ecclesiae traditionem n [...]sario crimine aspergit, qua Exorcizantur, & vt dixi exufflantur Paruuli: & vide Aug. ibidem l. 2. c. 17. & contra Iulian. Pelag. l. 6. c. 2. Iulianus the pelagiane: And lastly (to omitt sondry other) The denial of the Churches continuing visible, was condemned in theAug. epist. 170. ad Seuerinum saith, facile tibi est attendere & videre ciuitatem supra montem constitutā de qua Dominus ait in Euangelio, quod abscondi non possit ipsa est enim Ecclesia Catholica, vnde Catholice Graece appellatur quod per totum orbem terrarum diffunditur, hanc ignorare nulli licet, ideo secundum verbum Domini abs [...]ondi non potest: & vide Aug. de vnit. Eccles. c. 12. & 13. & ep. 48. ad Vincentium Rogatianum. Donatists, andHieromini d [...]al. a [...]u. Luciserianos paulo post medium & cap. 6. Prosecuteth this point at large: saying, (amonge much other matter) vbi sunt isti nimium prophani qui pluris sinagogas asserunt quam Ecclesias &c. si Ecclesiam non habet Christus, aut si in sardinia tantum habet nimium pauper factas est &c. (And then he aunswereth their obiection saying) Quod si de illa quae in Euangelio scripta est sententia sibi blandiuntur, Putas ne cum venerit filius hominis inueniet fidem super terram, sciant il [...]m fidem nominari. de qua Dominus alebat fides tua te saluum fecit. Luciferin [...]s and all this done by the sondry writers that liued in or next before the foresaide 160. yeares now in question. And which is most, not so much as any one Catholicke Father of the saide times being knowne, to haue but defended or excused any one of the saide persons so condemned in their deniall of any one of our foresaide recited seuerall Doctrines.
Secondly we do here-vnto add in further demonstration that whereas on the one parte our learned aduersaries are not able to shew, that any of the Catholicke writers of those foresaide 160. yeares did note or charge the then Bishopes of Rome with Innouation or change of faith, so againe we on the contrarie are able to giue perticuler proofe, how [Page 68] that the Catholicke Fathers of those same times,In those times was Leo the first Bishope of Rome beginning Anno. 440. & continuing POPE 21. yeares. (Teste Anastasio. de vitis Rom. pontific.) of the Communion which other Bishopes of that age professed to haue with him: Read Leo Epist. 39. & 41. c. 1. And the Epistle of Theodoret (a Graecian) to Leo and see the Centurie writers Centur. 5. c. 7. Col. 774. circa & posi med. & col. 775. initio & vide concil. Chalced. act 1. 2. & 3. Hillarius was Bishope of Rome Anno 461. of the like Communion of faith had with him: Vide Epistolas Tarraconensium Episcoporū ad Hillarium in 1. tom. concil. Felix the third was Bishope of Rome Anno 483. of the like Communion professed towards him: Vide Epistolam Anastasij Patriarchae Hierosol. ad faelicem Papam: Horm [...]sda was Pope Anno 514. and continued so about 9. yeares: Of the like Communion had with him: Vide Iohannem Patriacham Constantinop. in Epist. ad Hormisdam, in 1. tom. concill. inter Epistolas Hormisdae. & vide ibidem rescriptum Hormisdae ad Episcopos Betica prouinciae: & Epistolam Iustini Imperatoris ad Hormisdam. & Epistolam possessoris episcopi ad Horm sdam. & vide conc [...]lium habit: in epiro ad Hormisdam. extat apud Baromium Boniface the second was Pope Anno 530. of the like Communion had with him: Vide Epistolam Eulalij Carthaginensis ad Bonifacium secundum: & vide Centur. 6. c. 10. col. 670. Siluërius was Pope Anno 535. of like Communion had with him: Vide Epistolam Amatoris episcopi ad Siluerium: And see Liberatus in breuiario cap. 22. Vigilius was Pope Anno 537. of like Communion had with him: Vide Epistolam Eutychij Patriachae Constantinop. ad Vigilium, & Epistolam synod. mopsuestan. ad Vigilium: Also the 2. Councell called Turonense Anno. 570 can. 21. and the 1. Councell of Brach c. 22. & 23. Anno 572. professed like Communion with the Romane sea. Gregorius primus was Pope Anno 590. of like Communion had with him: Vide Epistolam Iohannis Episcopi rauennatensis ad Gregorium inter Epistolas Gregorij l. 2. indict. 11. ep. 55. & Isidorum in Praefact. in Opus conciliorum & vide Centur. 6. col. 677. 678. 679. & 687. line 4. 5. 6. &c. This Gregorie was Pope within two yeares or lesse of the last yeare now in question: and of the times nextThe Bishopes of Rome in the times next praecedent were, Innocentius Zozimus, B [...]niface, and Celesi [...]nus, of the Communion had with Innocentius Vide Epistolam Chrisostomi ad Innocentium, & Paladium in vita Chrisostomi, & vide Epistolam Concilij mil [...]uitant ad Innocentium, & Epistolam Concilij Carthag. ad Innocentium: And concerning the other three Bishopes of Rome, see heretofore page 40. in the margent at the letter c. fine. & vide Epistolam Civilli Alexandrini ad Caelestinum. A little before them was Pope Damasus of the Communion had with him read Hierom. Epist. 57. ad Damasum: And see the further Communion had betweene Damasus and the Greeke and Lattin Fathers specially reported and confessed by Crispinus in his booke of the state of the Church page 137. before, and afterConcerning the reuerend aestimation had of the Romane sea in the times next after the foresaide 160. yeares, it is generally confessed: yet for more certainetie reade the Centurie writers Cent. 7. c. 10. and how reuerently this our Nation of England thought as then thereof: Vide Bedam in hist. l. 2. c. 8. &c. 10. &c. 17. & 18. & 19. the same, professed to reuerence and Ioyne in Communion of faith with the then Romane Bishopes: wherby also it is (in our opinion) most euidently yet further proued, that during all that meane time of the foresaide 160. yeares, the Bishopes of the Romane [Page 69] Church did not come to the profession of our now religion, by meanes of any their then deuised Innouation or change in faith.
Thirdly this point is as yet made furthermore demonstratiue in that it is euident and by our learned aduersaries confessed, that sondry euen of the chiefest Articles of our faith, as namelySee heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 2. Reall presence: See heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 2. subdiuision 3. and hereafter in the margent at the letter 1. Tract. 3. Sect. 1. Sacrifice: See heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdeuision 5. Free-will: Ibidem Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 6. & 7. Merit of workes: Confessed by Mr. Bilson in his dooke of the full redemption of man-kinde pa. 188. fine. By Danaeus contra Bellarmine pag. 176. Paulo post medium. By Mr. Whitaker contra Duraeum l. 9. pag. 773. initio. And by Iohannes Lascitius in the booke entituled, de Russorum, Mascouitarum, & Tartarorum religione page 122. initio. And see heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 4. Limbus Patrum: Heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision. 4. And see also heretofore Tract. 2. Sect. 7. subdiuision. 6. Praier for the dead: Heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 7. And see the Centu [...]ie writers Centur. 3. col. 84. line 23. & Centur. 3. col. 83. line 47 & Centur. 4. col 1183. & Centur. 5. col. 1009. initio. And Mr. Fulke against the Remishe testament fol. 443. a. paulo ante med. And against Purgatory pag. 310. ante med. Praier to Saints: Hereafter Tract. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3. l. q. r. s. Monachisme: Heretofore Tract. 2. Sect. 3. initio. And hereafter Tract. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3. l. p. Vowed Chastitie: Heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 7. example 1. & 2. & 5. And heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 10. Popishe Primacie: See heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 3. subdiuision 8. The grace and necessitie of Baptisme: Vide ibidem. The Ceremonies of Baptisme: Vide ibidem subdiuision 9. And see also heretofore Tract. 1. Sect. 7. in the margent at the letter c. Conf [...]s [...]ion of sinnes and absolution: Heretofore Sect. 7. example 3. The vnmarried life of Priests: Confessed by I [...]bbertus de Principijs Christian. dogm. l. 2. c. 10 p. 675. ante med. & 678. fine. & 674. prope finem. And by Mr. Whitaker de sacra scriptura pag. 678. paulo posi med. & 668. fine. & 690. post med. & 670. post med. And by Carthwright in Mr. Whitgittes defence &c. pag. 103. ante med. & hertofore tract. 1. sect. 3. subdiuision 11. & 12. Vnwritten Traditions, And (to omitt many other)Hereafter tract. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3. most of ourSee heretofore tract. 1. sect. 3. l. y. Dionysius mencioning sixe of our Sacraments. Sacraments are plainely found to haue bene professed and publickely taught in the writings yet extant of sondrySee hereafter Tract. 2. c. 1. Sect. 3. of the confessed Doctrines beleeued and taught in the fourth hundreth yeares after Christ. aunc ent Fathers who liued before the foresaide 160 yeares now in question; In so much that Mr. Iohn Napeire (though our greate aduersarie) affirmeth and confesseth the like aunswerable continuance of [Page 70] our religion before that foresaide meane time of 160. yeares: Affirming to that end most plainely, that fromMr. Nappier vpon the reuelations proposition 37. pag. 68. post. med. the yeare of Christ 319. (which was before the saide time now in question) the Antichristiane and Papisticall Re [...]gne hath begunne reining vniuersally, and without any debatable Contradiction 1260 yeares last past: And that from Mr. Nappeir ibidem in c. 12. pag. 161. col. 3. circa medium. the yeare of Christ 316. God hath with-drawne his visible Church from open assemblies to the hartes of perticuler godly men &c. During the space of 1260. yeares: Mr. Nappeir ibidem in c. 11. pag. 145. col. 3. fin [...]. The Pope and his Clergy hauing p [...]ssessed the outward visible Church of Christians euen 1260. yeares: Vide ibidem p. 191. initio. The true Church abiding (so longe) Latente Vide ibidem p. 161. col. 3. circa medium & pag. 156. ante med. & 237. paulo post med. & 23. fine. and inuisible with (which his opinion or computationMr. Brocard vpon the reuelations fol. 110. a. & 123. b. Mr. Brocard also professeth to agree, whereby it is more then euident that our religion being thus publickly professed in the Romane Church both before and e [...]er since the foresaide 160. yeares, coulde not therefore be any matter of Innouation of change, newly brought in or diuised by the Romane Church either then or afterwards: Which point is also made as yet otherwise more manifest, by that which hath bene heretofore confessed by our aduersaries, concerning the conuersionSee heretofore Tract. 2. Sect. 1 in the marg. at the letter d. and in the texte at the letter c. and ibidem l. f. g. of vs Englishmen vnto our now professed Catholicke faith by S. Austine then sent from Gregorie Bishope of Rome. Concerning also the vndoubted conuersion of theSee heretofore Tract. 2. Sect. 2. l. m. and in the marg. there at the letter m. Brittons of Wales in the Apostles times, and their perseuerāceSee heretofore Tract 1. Sect 2. in the margent there at this marke ¶. in that faith till Austins comm [...]ng. And the foresaide euidenthereof see hertofore Tract 1. Sect. 2. l. 1. y. z. agreement of Austine and of the Brittones of Wales in all substantiall points of faith: So plainely is that faith which the Romane Church now professeth, the very same, whereto the Romanes were conuerted in the Apostles times. A thing so euidentlie true, that our aduersarie M. Bunny (though vsing all warines to acknowledge or vtter more then of necessitie he must) confesseth yet (as enforced) and saith of the whole time since the Apostles to this present, [Page 71] thatSee Mr. Bunny in his treatise tending to pacificatiō Sect 14. circa med. pa. 89. the Church of Rome hath euer continued after a sorte in the profession of the faith, since the time that by the Apostles it was deliuered to them &c. and hath also in some manner preserued and hitherto maintained both the word and the sacraments that Christ himselfe did leaue vnto vs, which surely (saith he) is a very speciall blessing of God, an euident worke of the holy Ghost. &c.
And thus much briefly whether that the Romane Church professing the right faith in the Apostles times, hath at any time since euer altred or changed the same, against our foresaid discourse wherof grounded vpon seuerall truthes confessed euen by our aduersaries if any boulder forehead shal wilfully oppose it selfe & shall without other answere or respecte had to that which his learned brethren haue heretofore cōfessed, and we otherwise proued, leape ouer al the foresaide proofes and ages iumping per saltum vp to the Apostles, & then tell vs,So Mr. Whitaker. l 7: Contra Duraeum pa. 478: ante medium saith, Nobis sufficit ex Pontificiorū dogmatū & scripturarum collatione discrimen & dissimilitàdinē [...]gnoscere: historicis liberum relinquimus scribere quid v [...] lint: that howsoeuer we proue from histories & Fathers or other testimonie of their owne writers, concerning euery of the ages since the Apostles times, yet the scriptures thēselues are (in hisHereof see hereafter Tract 2. c. 1. Sect. 1. initio in the margent at the letter p. and [...] q. opinion) contrary in many points to that faith which the Romane Church now professeth and that therein therefore she hath changed the faith which was first to her deliuered: Besides, that this is a most needie and miserable begging of the thing in question, against which we doe vehemently contest, (as being more then perswaded that our aduersaries cannot truely alleage from the first of Genesis to the last of the Reuelations, so much as any one texte of scripture, which maketh with them and against vs.) Let that man & all other of his minde yet also further consider, that for so much as the sacred SCRIPTVRES them selues, do as (beforeSee heretofore Tract: 1. Sect. 8. l. n. o. and hereafter Tract. 2. c. 2. Sect 1. prope initium. affirme that the Churches true Pastours must euermore continew and withstand all innouation of false doctrine euen with open reprehension. The answerable performance [Page 72] wherof in perticuler being matter of fact, can be to vs at this day, no otherwise made knowen, then vpon the onely credite of humane testimonie commended to vs by historie,Mr. Whitaker Contra Duraeum l. 7. page 472. saith, Quicquid de Ecclesiae Propagatione, Amplitudine, gloria veteres Prophetae predixerunt id perfectum esse historia Luculentissime testatur, ita vatic inijs Prophetarum, Ecclesiasticam historiā suffragari nulla controuersia est: the force of which testimonie our very aduersaries acknowledgeMr. Hooker in his Ecclesiastical Policie l. 2. p. 115. initio saith, The strength of mans authoritie is affirmatiuely such, that the weightest affaires in the world depend there-vpon: And ibidem pag. 116. ante medium: VVhatso-euer we beleeue concerning saluation by Christ, although the scripture be therin, the grounde of our beleefe, yet is mans authoritie the keye that openeth the dore &c. The scripture coulde not teach vs these thinges, vnlesse wee beleeued men: &c: And ibidem l. 1. page 86. ante medium: Of thinges necessarie the very cheefest is to knowe what bookes we are bound to esteeme holy, which point is confessed impossible for the scripture it selfe to teach: And l. 2. Sect. 4. page 102. fine. for if any one booke of scripture did giue testimonie to all, yet still that scripture which giueth credit to the rest would require an other scripture to giue credit vnto it, neither coulde we euer come to any pause whereon to rest our assurance vnlesse besides scripture there were some thinge which might assure vs. &c. vpon which ground l. 3. Sect. 8. page 146. fine. he saith, VVe all knowe that the first out-ward motiue leading men so to esteeme of the scripture, is the authority of Gods Church: And Mr. Whitaker aduersus Stapletonum l. 2. c. 4. page 298. post med, saith: non nego traditionem Ecclesiasticam esse argumentum quo argui & conuinci possit qui libri sunt canonici, qui non: (And ibidem page 300. ante medium) Hoc semper dixi sensi (que) & vide ibidem l. 1. page 25. ante medium. And in his booke against Mr. VVilliam Rainoldes page 44. circa med. In so much as the Protestant author of the treatise of the scripture and the Church (so greatelie commended by Bullinger in his preface before that booke) doth (after the Englishe translation thereof cap. 15: page 72:) say we coulde not beleeue the ghospell, were it not that the Church taught vs and witnessed, that this Doctrine was deliuered by the Apostles: And see further there cap. 19. page 74. & 75. that there-fore the same SCRIPTVRES do therein most euidently perforce reduce them to this foresaid triall by historie and Fathers: whereto if they stand, their ouerthrow (they see) is certaine, and in refusing the same, their flight is shamefull. As for the further extremest bouldnes of such, who are in these straites (resolued not to acknowledge the Iohannes Regius in libro apologetico &c. page 192. post medium: and 193. being vrged to shew wherein the Romane Church changed her faith, and not able to giue any one perticuler example thereof, betaketh him-selfe to this extreemest bouldnes. answering page 193. post medium: Sed deni (que) licet verum esset, Romanam Ecclesiam, in sua religione nihil mutasse, an propterea mox sequetur eam esse veram Ecclesiam? Non opinor: In defence whereof he is not ashamed to alleadge sondry impertinent reasons vnworthy of rehersall. Romane Church to be a true Church, though it were true, that she had not changed any thing in religion. We passe the same ouer as being most absurde, and much more worthy of contempt then answere.