A SVPPLICATI­ON MADE TO THE PRIVY COVNSEL BY Mr WALTER TRAVERS.

AT OXFORD, Printed by Ioseph Barnes, and are to be sold by John Barnes dwelling neere Holborne Conduit. 1612.

A SVPPLICATION MADE TO THE COVNSELL BY Mr WALTER TRAVERS.

RIGHT Honourable, the mani­fold benefits which al the subiects within this dominion doe at this present, and haue many yeares en­ioyed, vnder her Maiesties most happy and prosperous raigne, by your godly wisdome, and carefull watching over this estate night & day: I truely and vnfainedly acknowledge from the bottome of my heart, ought worthily to binde vs al, to pray continually to almighty God for the continuance & encrease of the life and good estate of your honours, and to be readie with al good duties to satisfie & serue the same to our power. Besides publique benefites common vnto all, I must needes, and do willingly con­fesse my selfe to stand bound by most speciall obligati­on to serue and honour you more then any other, for the honourable favour it hath pleased you to vouchsafe both oftentimes heretofore, and also now of late, in a matter more deare vnto me then anie earthly commo­ditie, that is the vpholding and furthering of my service in the ministring of the gospell of Jesus Christ. For [Page 2] which cause, as I haue beene alwaies careful so to carry my selfe as I might by no meanes giue occasion to bee thought vnworthy of so great a benefit, so do I stil, next vnto her Maiesties gracious countenance, hold nothing more deare and pretious vnto me, then that I may al­waies remaine in your Honours favour; which hath of­tentimes bin helpefull and comfortable vnto me in my ministerie, and to all such as reaped any fruit of my sim­ple and faithfull labour. In which dutiful regard, I hum­blie beseech your Honours to vouchsafe to do me this grace, to conceiue nothing of me otherwise thē accor­ding to the dutie wherein I ought to liue, by anie infor­mation against me, before your Honours haue heard my answere, and been throughly informed of the mat­ter. Which although it be a thing, that your wisdomes, not in favor, but in iustice yeeld to all men: yet the state of the calling vnto the Ministrie, whervnto it hath plea­sed God of his goodnesse to call me, though vnworthi­est of all, is so subiect to misinformation, as except wee may finde this favour with your Honours, we cannot looke for anie other, but that our vnindifferent parties may easilie procure vs to be hardlie esteemed of; and that we shalbe made like the poore fisherboates in the sea which everie swelling waue and billow raketh and runneth over. Wherin my estate is yet harder then anie others of my rancke & calling, who are indeed to fight against flesh & blood in what part soever of the Lords host and field they shall stand marshalled to serue, yet manie of them deale with it naked and vnfurnished of weapons: but my service was in a place where I was to encounter with it well appointed and armed with skill [Page 3] and with authoritie; whereof as I haue alwaies thus de­served, & therfore haue bin carefull by all good meanes to entertain still your Honors favorable respect of me, so haue I speciall cause at this present, wherein misin­formation to the Lord Archbishop of Canterburie, & other of the high commission hath bin able so farre to prevaile against me, that by their letter they haue inhi­bited me to preach, or execute anie act of Ministrie in the Temple or elsewhere, having never once called me before them to vnderstand by mine answere the trueth of such things as had bin enformed against me. We haue a storie in our bookes, wherein the Pharises pro­ceeding against our Saviour Christ without having heard him, is reproved by an honorable Counseller (as the Evangelist doth tearme him) saying, doth our lawe iudge a man before it heare him, & know what he hath done? Which I do not mention to the ende that by an indirect and covert speech, I might so compare those, who haue without ever hearing me pronounced a hea­vie sentence against me, for, notwithstanding such pro­ceedings, I purpose by Gods grace to carrie my selfe to­wards them in all seeming duetie agreeable to their pla­ces: much lesse do I presume to liken my cause to our Saviour Christs, who hold it my chiefest honor & hap­pines to serue him, though it be but among the hindes and hired servants, that serue him in the basest corners of his house. But my purpose in mentioning it, is to shew by the iudgement of a Prince and great man in Is­raell that such proceeding standeth not with the lawe of God, and in a princely patterne to shew it to be a no­ble part of an honorable Counseller, not to allow of [Page 4] indirect dealings, but to allow and affect such a course in iustice, as is agreeable to the law of God. Wee haue also a plaine rule in the word of God not to proceed a­ny otherwise against any elder of the Church; much lesse against one that laboureth in the word and in tea­ching: which rule is delivered with this most earnest charge and obtestation, I beseech and charge thee in the sight of God, and the Lord Iesus Christ, and the e­lect Angels,1. Tim. 5. vers. 19.21. that thou keepe those [rules] without pre­ferring one before another, doing nothing of partiali­tie, or enclining to either part; which Apostolicall and most earnest charge, I referre it to your Honours wis­dome how it hath beene regarded in so heavie a iudge­ment against me, without ever hearing my cause, and whether, as having God before their eies, and the Lord Iesus by whom all former iudgements shall bee tried a­gaine, and as in the presence of the elect Angels wit­nesses, and observers of the regiment of the Church, they haue proceeded thus to such a sentence. They al­leage indeed two reasons in their letters wherevpon they restraine my ministery, which, if they were as strong against me as they are supposed, yet I referre to your Honors wisdomes, whether the qualitie of such an offence as they charge me with, which is in effect but an indiscretion, deserue so greivous a punishment both to the Church and me, in taking away my mini­stery, and that poore little commoditie which it yeel­deth for the necessarie maintenance of my life; if so vn­equall a ballancing of faults and punishments, should haue place in the commonwealth, surely wee should shortly haue no actions vpon the case, nor of trespasse, [Page 5] but all should be pleaes of the Crowne, nor any man a­merced, or fined, but for every light offence put to his ransome. I haue credibly heard, that some of the mini­stery haue beene committed of grievous transgressions of the lawes of God and men, being of no abilitie to do other service in the Church then to read, yet hath it bin thought charitable and standing with Christian mode­ration and temperancie, not to depriue such of ministe­ry and beneficency, but to inflict some more tolerable punishmēt. Which I write not because such as I think, were to be favored, but to shew how vnlike their dea­ling is with me, being through the goodnesse of God not to be touched with any such blame, and one who according to the measure of the guift of God, haue la­boured now some yeares painefully, in regard of the weake estate of my body in preaching the Gospell, and as I hope not altogether vnprofitably in respect of the Church. But J beseech your Honours to giue me leaue breifly to declare the particular reasons of their letters, and what answer I haue to make vnto it.

The first is, that as they say I am not lawfully called to the function of the ministery, nor allowed to preach according to the lawes of this Church of England.

For answer to this, I had need to divide the points, & first to make answer to the former, wherein leauing to shew what by the holy Scriptures is required in a law­full calling and that all that is to be found in mine, that I bee not too long for your other waightie affaires, I rest.

I this answer, my calling to the ministery was such as in the calling of any therevnto is appointed to bee [Page 6] vsed by the orders agreed vpon in the Nationall Sy­nods of the lowe Countries, for the direction and gui­dance of their Churches, which orders are the same with those whereby the French & Scottish Churches are governed, whereof I haue shewed such sufficient te­stimoniall to my L. the Archbishop of Canterburie, as is requisite in such a matter: whereby it must needs fall out if any man be lawfully called to the ministery in those Churches then is my calling, being the same with theirs, also lawfull. But I suppose notwithstanding they vse this generall speech, they meane only my calling is not sufficient to deale in the ministery within this land, because I was not made minister according to that or­der which in this cause is ordained by our laws. Wher­vnto I beseech your Honours to consider throughly of mine answer, because exception now againe is taken to my ministery whereas hauing beene heretofore cal­led in question for it, I so answered the matter, as I con­tinued my ministery, and for any thing I discerned, loo­ked to heare that no more obiected vnto me. The com­munion of Saints (which every Christian man profes­seth to beleeue) is such, as that the acts which are done in any true Church of Christs according to his word, are held as lawfull being done in one Church, as in ano­ther. Which as it holdeth in other acts of ministery, as baptisme, marriage, and such like, so doth it in the cal­ling to the ministery; by reason whereof all Churches doe acknowledge and receaue him for a minister of the word, who hath beene lawfully called therevnto in any Church of the same professiō. A Doctor created in any Vniversitie of Christendome, is acknowledged suffici­ently [Page 7] qualified to teach in any country. The Church of Rome it selfe, and the Canon law holdeth it that being ordered in Spaine, they may execute that belongeth to their order in Italie, or in any other place. And the Churches of the gospell never made any question of it. Which if they shall now begin to make doubt of, and denie such to be lawfully called to the ministery, as are called by another order then our owne, then may it wel be looked for that other Churches will doe the like: & if a minister called in the low Countries be not lawful­ly called in England, thē may they say to our preachers which are there, that being made by another order thē theirs, they cānot suffer them to execute any act of mi­nisterie amongst them, which in the ende must needes breed a schisme & dangerous division in the Churches. Further I haue heard of those that are learned in the lawes of this land, that by expresse Statute to that pur­pose Anno 13. vpon subscription of the Articles agreed vpon Anno 62. that they who pretend to haue beene ordered by another order then that which is now esta­blished, are of like capacitie to enioy any place of mini­stery within the land, as they that haue bin ordered ac­cording to that is now by law in this case established. Which comprehēding manifestly all even such as were made Priests according to the order of the Church of Rome, it must needs be that the law of a Christian land professing the Gospell should be as favorable for a mi­mister of the worde as for a Popish Priest, which also was so found in Mr Whittingames case, who notwith­standing such replies against him, enioyed still the bene­fit he had by his ministerie, and might haue done vntill [Page 8] this day if God had spared him life so long, which if it be vnderstood so and practised in others, why should the change of the person alter the right, which the law giveth to all other. The place of ministery, wherevnto I was called, was not presentatiue, and if it had beene so surely they would never haue presented anie man whō they never knew; and the order of this Church is agree able herein to the word of God, and the ancient & best Canons, that no man should be made minister sine ti­tulo. therefore having none I could not by the orders of this Church haue entred into the ministery, before I had charge to tend vpon. When I was at Anwerp, and to take a place of ministerie among the people of that nation, I see no cause whie I should haue returned a­gaine over the seas for orders here, nor how I could haue done it, without disallowing the orders of the Churches provided in the country where I was to liue. Whereby J hope it appeareth, that my calling to the ministery is lawfull, and maketh me by our law of capa­citie to enioy any benefit or commoditie, that any o­ther by reasō of his ministery may enioie. But my cause is yet more easie, who reaped no benefit of my ministe­ry by law, receaving only a benevolence and voluntary contribution, and the ministery I dealt with being prea­ching only, which everie Deacon here may doe being licensed, and certaine that are neither Ministers nor Deacons: thus J answer the former of these two points whereof if there be yet any doubt, J humbly desire for a finall ende thereof, that some competent iudges in law may determine of it; wherevnto J referre & submit my selfe with all reverence and dutie.

The second is, that I preached without license, where vnto this is my answere. I haue not presumed vpon the calling I had to the ministery abroad, to preach, or deal with any part of the ministry within this Church with out the consent and allowance of such as were to al­low me vnto it: my allowance was from the Bishop of London, testified by his two severall letters to the inner Temple, who without such testimony would by no meanes rest satisfied in it; which letters being by mee produced, J referre it to your Honours wisdome, whe­ther I haue taken vpon me to preach without being al­lowed (as they charge) according to the orders of the Realme. Thus having answered the second point also, J haue done with the obiection of dealing without cal­ling or license.

The other reason they alleage is concerning a late action wherein J had to deale with Mr Hooker, Master of the Temple: in the handling of which cause they charge me with an indiscretion and want of dutie, in that I inveighed (as they say) against certaine points of doctrine taught by him as erroneous, not conferring with him, nor complaining of it to them. My answere herevnto standeth in declaring to your Honours the whole course and carriage of that cause, & the degrees of proceeding in it, which J will doe as briefly as I can, and according to the truth, God be my witnes, as neere as my best memorie, and notes of remembrance may serue me therevnto. After that I haue taken away that which seemeth to haue moved them to thinke me not charitably minded to Mr Hooker, which is because hee was brought into M. Alveyes place, wherin this Church [Page 10] desired that J might haue succeeded; which place, if J would haue made sute to haue obtained, or if J had am­bitiously affected and sought, J would not haue refused to haue satisfied by subscription such as the matter then seemed to depend vpon: whereas contrariewise, not­withstanding J would not hinder the Church to doe that they thought to be most for their edification and comfort, yet did J neither by speech, nor letter, make sute to any for the obtaining of it, following herein that resolution which J iudge to bee most agreeable to the word and will of God, that is, that labouring and suing for places and charges in the Church is not lawfull. Further whereas at the sute of the Church some of your Honours entertained the cause, and brought it to a neare issue, that there seemed nothing to remaine, but the commendation of my Lord the Archbishop of Canterburie, when as he could not bee satisfied but by my subscribing to his late articles, and that my answere agreeing to subscribe according to any law, and to the statute provided in that case, but praying to be respited for subscribing to any other, which J could not in con­science doe, either for the Temple (which otherwise he said he would not commend mee to) nor for any other place in the Church, did so little please my Lord Arch­bishop, as he resolued that otherwise J should not bee commended to it. J had vtterly here no cause of offence against Mr Hooker, whom J did in no sort esteeme to haue prevented or vnderminded mee, but that God dis­posed of me as it pleased him, by such meanes and occa­sions as I haue declared. Moreover as J had taken no cause of offence at Mr Hooker for being preferred so [Page 11] there were many witnesses that J was glad that the place was given him, hoping to liue in all godly peace and comfort with him, both for acquaintance & good will which hath beene betweene vs, and for some kinde of affinitie in the marriage of his neerest kinred & mine: since his comming J haue so carefully endevoured to entertaine all good correspondence & agreement with him, as I thinke he himselfe will beare mee witnesse of many earnest disputations and conferences with him a­bout the matter; the rather because that contrary to my expectation, hee enclined from the beginning but smally therevnto, but ioined rather with such as had al­waies opposed themselues to any good order in this charge, and made themselues to be brought indisposed to his present state and proceedings. For both knowing that Gods commandement charged me with such du­tie, and discerning how much our peace might further the good service of God and his Church, and the mu­tuall comfort of vs both, J had resolued constantly to seeke for peace, and though it should fly from me (as J saw it did by meanes of some, who little desired to see the good of our Church) yet according to the rule of Gods word to follow after it. Which being so (as here­of J take God to witnesse, who searcheth the heart, and reines, and by his sonne will iudge the world, both the quicke and dead) I hope no charitable iudgement can suppose mee to haue stood evill affected towardes him for his place, or desirous to fall into anie con­troversie with him. Which my resolution I pursued, that whereas I discovered sundry vnfound matters in his doctrine (as manie of his sermons tasted of some [Page 12] sower leaven, or other) yet thus I carried my selfe to­wards him. Matters of smaller weight, and so covert­lie discovered that no great offence to the Church was to be feared in them, I wholly passed by, as one that dis­cerned nothing of them, or had been vnfurnished of re­plies. For other of greater moment, and so openlie deli­vered, as there was iust cause of feare, least the truth and church of God should be preiudiced and perilled by it, and such as the conscience of my dutie & calling would not suffer mee altogither to passe over, this was my course, to deliver, when I should haue iust cause by my texte, the truth of such doctrine as hee had otherwise taught in generall speeches, without touch of his per­son in anie sort, and further at cōvenient oportunity to confer with him in such points. According to which determination, whereas he had taught certaine things concerning predestination otherwise then the word of God doth, as it is vnderstood by all churches professing the gospell, and not vnlike that wherwith Coranus some times troubled his church; I both delivered the truth of such points in a generall doctrine, without anie touch of him in particular, and conferred with him also privatlie vpon such articles. In which conference, I remem­ber, when I vrged the consent of all churches, and good writers against him that I knew, and desired if it were o­therwise, what authors hee had seene of such doctrine, he answered me that his best author was his owne rea­son: which I wished him to take heed of, as a matter stā ­ding with christian modestie & wisedome in a doctrine not received by the church, not to trust to his own iudgment so far, as to publish it before he had cōferred with [Page 13] others of his profession, labouring by dailie praier, and studie to know the will of God, as he did, to see how they vnderstood such doctrine: notwithstanding hee with wavering replying that hee woulde some other time deale more largelie in the matter, I wished him, & praied him not so to doe, for the peace of the church, which by such meanes might be hazarded; seeing he could not but thinke, that men, who make anie consci­ence of their ministrie, will iudge it a necessarie duty in them, to teach the truth, and to convince the contrarie. Another time vpon like occasion of this doctrine of his that the assurance of that we beleeue by the word, is not so certaine, as of that wee perceiue by sense; I both taught the doctrine otherwise, namely the assurance of faith to be greater, which assureth both of things a­boue, and contrarie to all sense and humane vnderstan­ding, and dealt with him also privatlie vpon that point. According to which course, of late, when as hee had taught that the Church of Rome is a true Church of Christ, and a sanctified Church by profession of that truth, which God hath revealed vnto vs by his sonne, though not a pure, and perfect Church: & further that he doubted not, but that thousāds of the fathers, which lived and died in the superstitions of that church, were saved because of their ignorance, which excuseth them, misalleaging to that end a1. Tim. 1.13. text of scripture to proue it: the matter being of set purpose openly and at large handled by him, and of that moment that might preiu­dice the faith of Christ, encourage the ill affected to continue still in their damnable waies, and other weake in faith to suffer themselues easilie to bee seduced to the [Page 14] destruction of their soules; I thought it my most boun­den duetie to God, and to his church, whilest I might haue oportunitie to speak with him, to teach the truth in a generall speech in such points of doctrine.

At which time I taught that such as die, or haue died at anie time in the Church of Rome holding in their ignorance that faith, which is taught in it, and namelie iu­stification in part by workes, could not be said by the scriptures to be saued. In which matter foreseeing that, if swaded not warilie in it, I should be in danger to bee reported (as hath fallen out since notwithstanding) to condemne all the fathers: I said directlie and plainly to all mens vnderstanding, that it was not indeede to bee doubted, but manie of the fathers were saued, but the meanes (I said) was not their ignorance, which excuseth no man with God, but their knowledge and faith of the truth, which it appeareth God vouchsafed them by ma­nie notable monuments and recordes extant of it in all ages. Which being the last point in all my sermon ri­sing so naturally from the text I then expounded, as would haue occasioned me to haue delivered such mat­ter, notwithstanding the former doctrine had bin soūd, and being dealt in by a generall speech without touch of his particular: I looked not that a matter of contro­versie would haue beene made of it, no more then had beene of my like dealing in former time. But far other­wise, then I looked for Mr Hooker shewing no griefe of offence taken at my speech all the weeke long, the next Saboth, leaving to proceed vpon his ordinarie text, professed to preach againe that he had done the day before for some question that his doctrine was drawne into, [Page 15] which he desired might be examined with all severity.

So proceeding, he bestowed his whole time in that discourse, concerning his former doctrine, and answe­ring the places of Scripture, which I hadApoc [...]3 4. Gal 5 [...] 3 4. alleaged, to proue that a man dying in the Church of Rome is not to be iudged by the Scriptures to be saved. In which long speech, and vtterly impertinent to his text, vnder colour of answering for himselfe, he impugned directly and openly to all mens vnderstanding the true doctrine which I had delivered, and added to his former points some other like (as willingly one errour followeth an­other) that is, that the Galathians ioining with faith in Christ circumcision, as necessarie to salvation, might not be saved. And that they of the Church of Rome may be saved by such a faith of Christ, as they had, with a generall repentance of all their errours, notwithstan­ding their opinion of iustificatiō in part by their works & merits. I was necessarily, though not willingly drawn to say something to the points he obiected against soūd doctrine, which J did in a short speech in the end of my sermon, with protestation of so doing, not of any fini­ster affection to any man, but to beare witnesse to the truth according to my calling. And wished, if the mat­ter should needs further be dealt in, some other more convenient way might bee taken for it; wherein, I hope, my dealing was manifest to the consciences of all indifferent hearers of me that daie, to haue beene according to peace, and without any vncharitablenesse being duly considered.

For that I conferred with him the first day, I haue shewed that the cause requiring of me in duety at the [Page 16] least not to be altogither silent in it, beeing a matter of such consequence, that the time also being short, wher­in I was to preach after him, the hope of the fruit of our communication being small, vpon experience of former conferences, my expectation beeing that the church should be no further troubled with it, vpon the motion I made of raking some other course of dealing. I suppose my differring to speake with him till some fit opportunitie, cannot in charitie be iudged vncharita­ble.

The second day his vnlooked for opposition with the former reasons made it to be a matter that required of necessitie some publique answere; which beeing so temperate as I haue shewed, if notwithstanding it be censured as vncharitable, and punished so grievously as it is, what should haue beene my punishment if (with out all such cautions & respects as qualified my speech) I had before all, and in the vnderstanding of all so repro­ved him offending openly, that other might haue fea­red to do the like? Which yet if I had done, might haue beene warranted by the rule & charge of the Apostles, them that offend openly rebuke openlie, that the rest may also feare, and by his example, who when Peter in this verie case which is now betweene vs, had (not in preaching) but in a matter of conversation not gone with a right foot, as was fit, for the truth of the gospell, conferred not privately with him, but, as his owne rule required, reproved him openlie before all, that other might hear, and feare, and not dare to doe the like: all which rea­sons togither weighed I hope will shew the manner of my dealing to haue beene charitable, and warranta­ble [Page 17] in everie sort.

The next saboth day after this Mr Hooker kept the way he had entred into before, and bestowed his whole houre and more only vpon the questions hee had mo­ved and mainetained, wherein he so set forth the agree­ment of the Church of Rome with vs, & their disagree­ment from vs, as if we had consented in the greatest, & weightiest points, and differed only in certaine smaller matters: which agreement noted by him in two chiefe points, is not such as hee woulde haue made men be­leeue. The one in that he said, they acknowledged al men sinners, even the blessed Virgin, though some of them freed her from sin, for the Councel of Trent holdeth that shee was free from sinne. Another in that he said; they teach Christs righteousnesse to be the only meritorious cause of taking awaie sinne, and dif­fer from vs onlie in the applying of it. For Thomas A­quinas their chiefe schooleman, and Archbishop Cathe­rinus teach, that Christ tooke awaie onlie originall sin, and that the rest are to be taken away by our selues; yea the councel of Trent teacheth that righteousnes, wher­by we are righteous in Gods sight, is an inherent righ­teousnesse: which must needes be of our owne works, and cannot be vnderstoode of the righteousnesse inhe­rent only in Christs person, and accounted vnto vs. Moreover hee taught the same time, that neither the Galathians, nor the Church of Rome did directly over­throw the foundation of iustification by Christ alone, but only by consequent, and therefore might well bee saved; or else neither the Churches of Lutherans, nor any which hold anie manner of errour could bee saved, [Page 18] because (saith he) everie errour by consequent over­throweth the foundation. In which discourses and such like hee bestowed his whole time, & more, which, if he had affected either the truth of God, or the peace of the Church, he would truely not haue done. Whose example could not draw me to leaue the Scripture I tooke in hand, but standing about an houre to deliver the doctrine of it, in the end vpon iust occasion of the text leaving sundrie other his vnsound speeches, and keeping me still to the principall; I confirmed the be­leeving the doctrine of iustification by Christ only to be necessarie to the iustification of all that shoulde bee saved, and that the Church of Rome directlie denieth that a man is saved by Christ, or by faith alone without the workes of the law. Which my answere as it was most necessarie for the service of God, and the church, so was it without anie immodest, or reprochfull speech in Mr Hooker, whose vnfound and willfull dealings in a cause of so great importance to the faith of Christ, and salvation of the Church, notwithstanding I knew well what speech it deserved, and what some zealous earnest man of the spirit of Iohn and Iames surnamedMark. 3 17. Boaner­ges sonnes of thunder woulde haue saide in such a case: yet I chose rather to content my selfe in exhorting him to revisite his doctrine, as2. Sam. 7.2.3.4.5. Nathan the Prophet did, the devise which without consulting with God hee had of himselfe given to David concerning the building of the Temple: and withGal. 2.11.14 Peter the Apostle to indure to be withstoode in such a case not vnlike vnto this. This in effect was that which passed betweene vs concer­ning this matter, & the invectiues I made against him, [Page 19] wherewith I am charged; which rehearsall, I hope, may cleare me (with all that shall indifferently consider it) of the blames laid vpon me for want of duty to Mr Hooker in not conferring with him, whereof I haue spoken suf­ficiently alreadie: and to the high commission in not revealing the matter to them, which yet now I am fur­ther to answere. My answere is, that I protest no contempt nor willfull neglect of any lawfull authoritie staide me from complaining vnto them, but these rea­sons following.

First I was in some hope, that Mr Hooker, notwith­standing he had beene overcarried with a shew of cha­ritie to preiudice the truth, yet when it should bee suffi­cientlie proved, would haue acknowledged it, or at the least induced with peace, that it might be offered with­out either offence to him, or to such as would receiue it; either of which would haue taken away anie cause of iust complaint. When neither of these fel out accor­ding to my expectation, and desire, but that he replyed to the truth, and obiected against it, I thought hee might haue some doubtes, and scruples in himselfe, which yet if they were cleared, hee would either em­brace some doctrine, or at least suffer it to haue his course; which hope of him I nourished so long as the matter was not bitterlie, and immodestlie handled be­tweene vs.

Another reason was the cause it selfe, which accor­ding to the parable of the tares (which are said to bee sowne amongst the wheat) sprung vp first in his grasse. Therefore as the servants in that place are not said to haue come to complain to the Lord till the tares came [Page 20] to shew their fruits in their kind: so I thinking it yet but a time of discovering of it, what it was, desired not their sickle to cut it downe.

For further answer it is to be considered, that the cō ­science of my duty to God, and to his Church, did bind me at the first to deliver sound doctrine in such points, as had beene otherwise vttered in the place, where I had now some yeares taught the truth. Otherwise the re­buke of the [...] Prophet had fallen vpon mee for not go­ing vp to the breach, and standing in it, and the [...] perill for answering the blood of the Cittie, in whose watch-tower I sate, if it had bin surprised by my default. More­over my publike protestation in being vnwilling, that if any were not yet satisfied, some other more conveniēt way might be taken for it. And lastly that J had resolued (which I vttered before to some dealing with me about the matter) to haue protested the next Saboth day, that I would no more answere in that place any obiections to the doctrine taught by any meanes, but some other way satisfie such as should require it. These I trust may make it appeare, that I failed not in duty to authoritie; notwithstanding I did not complaine, nor giue over so soone dealing in the case. If I did, how is he cleere, which can alleage none of all these for himselfe, who leaving the expounding of the Scriptures, and his ordi­nary calling, voluntarily discoursed vpō schoole points and questions neither of edification, nor of truth, who after all this, as promising to himselfe, and to vntruth a victory by my silence, added yet in the next Saboth day to the maintenance of his former opinions these which follow.

That no additament taketh away the foundation ex­cept it be a privatiue, of which sort neither the workes added to Christ by the Church of Rome, nor circumci­sion by the Galathians were as one denieth him not to be a man, that saith he is a righteous man, but hee that saith he is a dead man: whereby it might seeme that a man might without hurt adde workes to Christ, and pray also, that God and S. Peter would saue him.

That the Galathians case is harder then the case of the Church of Rome, because the Galathians ioined circumcision with Christ, which God hath forbidden, and abolished: but that which the Church of Rome ioi­ned with Christ were good workes which God hath commanded. wherein he cōmitted a double fault; one, in expounding all the question of the Galathians, and consequently of the Romans, and other Epistles of cir­cumcision only, and the ceremonies of the law (as they doe who answer for the Church of Rome in their wri­tings) contrary to the cleere meaning of the Apostle, as may appeare by many strong, and sufficient reasons: the other in that hee said the addition of the Church of Rome was of workes commanded of God, whereas the least part of the workes, whereby they looked to merit, was of such workes, and most were of supererogation, and of workes which God never commanded, but was highly displeased with, as of Masses, Pilgrimages, par­dons, paines of Purgatory, and such like: further that no one sequell vrged by the Apostle against the Galathi­ans for ioining circumcision with Christ, but might be aswell enforced against the Lutherans, that is, that for their vbiquitie it may be aswell said to them, if yee hold [Page 22] the body of Christ to be in all places, you are fallen frō grace, you are vnder the curse of the law, saying, cursed be he that fulfilleth not all things written in this booke with such like: he added yet further, that to a Bishop of the Church of Rome, to a Cardinall, yea to the Pope himselfe, acknowledging Christ to bee the saviour of the world, denying other errours, & being discomfor­ted for want of workes whereby he might be iustified, he would not doubt but vse this speech; Thou holdest the foundation of Christian faith, though it bee but by a slender thread; thou holdest Christ, though but as by the hem of his garment, why shouldst thou not hope that vertue may passe from Christ to saue thee? That, which thou holdest of iustification by thy workes, o­verthroweth indeed by consequent the foundation of Christian faith; but be of good cheere, thou hast not to doe with a captious Sophister, but with a mercifull God, who will iustifie thee, for that thou holdest, and not take the advantage of doubtfull construction to cō demne thee. And if this, hee said, bee an errour, I hold it willingly; for it is the greatest comfort I haue in this world, without which I would not wish either to speak or to liue. Thus far, being not to bee answered in it any more, he was bold to proceed; the absurditie of which speech I need not to stand vpon. I thinke the like to this and other such in this sermon, and the rest of this mat­ter hath not beene heard in publique places within this land since Queene Maries daies. What consequēce this doctrine may be of, if he bee not by authoritie ordered to revoke it, I beseech your HH. as the truth of God & his gospell is deere and pretious vnto you, according [Page 23] to your godly wisdomes to consider.

I haue beene bold to offer to your HH. a long and tedious discourse of these matters. But speech being like to tapestrie, which, if it be folded vp, sheweth but part of that which is wrought, and being vnlapt & laid open sheweth plainely to the eye all the worke that is in it; I thought it necessarie to vnfold this tapestrie, & to hang vp the whole chamber of it in your most Honorable se­nate: that so you may the more easily discerne of all the peeces, and the sundry workes and matters contained in it. Wherin my hope is your HH. may see J haue not deserved so great a punishment as is laid vpon the Church for my sake, and also vpon my selfe in taking from me the exercise of my ministery: which punish­ment how heavie it may seeme to the Church, or fall out indeed to be, J referre it to them to iudge, & spare to write what I feare; but to my selfe it is exceeding grievous, for that it taketh from mee the exercise of my calling. Which I doe not say is deare vnto mee as the meanes of that little benefit whereby I liue (although this be a lawfull consideration, and to bee regarded of me in due place, and of the authority vnder whose pro­tection I most willingly liue, even by Gods commande­ment, both vnto them, and vnto me:) but which ought to bee more pretious to me then my life, for the loue which J should beare to the glory and honour of Al­mightie God, and to the edification and salvation of his Church, for that my life cannot any other way be of like service to God, nor of such vse and profit to men by any meanes: for which cause, as J discerne, how deare a­ny ministery ought to be vnto me, so it is my harty de­sire, [Page 24] and most humble request vnto God, to your HH. and to all the authoritie I liue vnder, to whom any dea­ling herein belongeth, that I may spend my life accor­ding to his example, who in a word of like sound of ful­ler sense * comparing by it the bestowing of his life to the offering powred out vpon the sacrifice of the faith of Gods people, and especially of this Church where­vpon I haue already powred out a great part thereof in the same calling, from which I stand nowe restrained. And if your HH. shall finde it so that J haue not deser­ved so great a punishment, but rather performed the duty, which a good and faithful servant ought in such a case to do to his Lord, & the people he putteth him in trust withall carefully to keepe; I am a most humble sui­ter by these presents to your HH. that by your godly wisdome, some good course may be taken for the resto­ring of me to my ministery and place againe. Which so great a favour shall bind me yet in a greater obligation of dutie (which is already so great, as it seemed nothing could be added vnto it, to make it greater) to honour God daily for the continuance and increase of your good estate, and to be ready with all the poore meanes God hath given me, to doe your HH. that faithfull ser­vice, I may possibly performe: but if, notwithstanding my cause be never so good, your HH. can by no meanes pacifie such as are offended, nor restore me againe, then am I to rest in the good pleasure of God, and to com­mend to your HH. protection vnder her Maiesties my privat life, while it shall be led in dutie, and the Church to him, who hath redeemed to himselfe a people with his pretious blood, & is making ready to cōe to iudge [Page 25] both the quick & the dead, to giue to every one accor­ding as hee hath done in this life, bee it good or evill, to the wicked and vnbeleever iustice vnto death, but to the faithfull, and such as loue his truth mercy and grace to life everlasting.

Your Honours most bounden, and most humble suppliant, Walter Travers Minister of the word of God.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.