A CATE­CHISME or institution of the Christen Religion.

Newely set forthe by Ri­chard Tauerner.

Anno. M.D.XXXIX.

Cum Priuilegio, ad impri­mendum solum.

RICHARD TAVER­ner to the Christen Readers.

FOR asmuche as nat only fathers and mothers (whiche by theDeu. 1 [...]. lawe of god be com­maunded to teache theyr chyldren) godfathers and godmo­thers (whiche be as it were su­erties for the same purpose) haue bene of longe tyme in su­che sorte blynded and vtterly ignoraunt in Christes doctrine whiche neuertheles they pro­fesse, that they be nat able to Catechise, that is to say, to in­stitute, teache, bryng vp, and instructe theyr chyldren, for [Page] whom the one haue promised to the churche at the Christe­ning of the same,Deu. 11. the other are boūden by goddes lawe (as a­fore is remembred) to se them taught and ryghtly instructed in the christē faythe and lawes of god: but also the prestes thē selues whiche be theyr curates and pastoures1. Tim. 3 (where as by Paules sentence they ought to be apte to teache) partely for defaulte of lerning and partly for neglectynge theyr flocke (lyke careles hyrelinges be be exceading defectiue in this be halfe:Ioan. 10 I therfore moued of christen charitie to vtter the lytle [Page] talent that God hathe en­dowed me with, am enforced, accordynge to the example of learned men in other coūtreis, to set forthe vnto my coūtrey men some handsome and compendiouse Catechisme (which is so called because it instru­cteth, and bryngeth vp the yōge christiā in Christes lawe) For vndoubted suche one is to be setforthe in the churche to be lerned and as it were drō ken in of chyldren, to be oftē reuolued of men and women, yea and to be continually ca­ryed in the hādes or bosomes (but much rather ī the hertes) [Page] of all ages, for an instruction to the ignoraūt persons, a cō ­forte to the troubled, reioyce to the faythfull, spurre to the slouthfull, brydell to the arro­gant, relief to the desperate, occupation to the ydle, refres­shyng to the occupied, to be shorte, an argumēt and mater for sklender shepherdes whervpon to instructe theyr cure.

Nowe therfore, lyke as the kynges most excellent maiesty moste worthy to be compared vnto the godly kynge Eze­chias,4. R [...]. 18. whiche destroyed the moste detestable ydolatrie of the brasen serpēt, by the hygh [Page] prouidence of God traueileth dayly of a wonderfull zeale he beareth to the auaūcement of godes true religion, to banysh all poprie and Romyshe mar­chaundyse within this his gra­ces realme, to the vnspeakable healthe of his people the chur­che of Englāde, to the supre­macie wherof he is by the said prouidēce of god nowe at last in spyte of all his enemies re­stored: So semblably it shalbe your parte to embrace suche pure, true and sincere doctrine of Christe as setteth forth the same, & so vtterly to renoūce nat only the Romisshe byshop [Page] our archenemie and the moste pestilēt ouerthrower of al god lynes, but also his deuelyshe lawes, constitutions and supersticious thynges whiche haue hertofore intangled our cons­ciences contrary to the Euan­gelicall libertie and trouthe of gods worde.

That if ye shall appeare lo­uyngly & gredely to embrace this brief worke, wherin is cō ­prysed aswell compendiously as purely the hole doctrine of the christen religion: ye shall occasion me not only nat to repente me of my paynes taken for your sakes in this behalfe, [Page] but also to take the lyke when so euer I shal espy that my in­dustry and diligēce may serue to your edification, profyt, in­struction and pleasure, whiche thynge is my onely desire and instaūt prayer, as best knoweth god, that seeth all, to whom be all glory prayse and thankes for euer and euer. Amen.

GOD SAVE THE KYNGE.

AN INSTITV­cion or Catechisme of the Christen Re­ligion.

That all men be borne to re­ligion or godlynes.

BEcause no man at all can be founde, be he neuer so barbarouse, neuer so rudely & [...]uyl brought vp, but hathe some fe­lyng of religiō or godlynes, & is naturally disposed to the same: it is playne that we all be made to this purpose and ende, that we shulde knowledge the maie­stie of our maker and the same [Page] so knowledged to imbrace, and with al feare, loue and reuerēce to worshyp. But (to let the vn­godly alone which seke nothing els but to drowne this opiniō of God planted in theyr myndes and to wype ye same out of theyr memory) we at least which pro­fesse godlynes and wolde be cal­led Christes folke, nedes muste thynke that this brykle and vn­stable lyfe ought to be nothyng els then a certayne saye or me­ditatiō of immortalitie. Nowe, the euerlastyng and immortall lyfe we can no where fynde but in god. Wherfore the chief care and thought of our lyfe shulde be to seke god, and with all the endeuours of our mynde to get [Page 2] vp vnto hym, and to repose our selues nowhere elles, saue in him allonely.

What difference is betwene the false and true religiō.

FOr as muche as we knowe this by our comō sence and vnderstandyng, that if our lyfe be destitute and voyde of religiō we lyue moste wretchedly, yea & differ nothynge at all from the brute and vnreasonable bea­stes, there is no man that woll seme to abhorre vtterly from al godlines religion and seruice of god. But nowe certaynly in the maner and forme of expressyng and declarynge this religion is [Page] doubtles no lytle difference: for the most parte of mē be nat tou­ched with the true and syncere feare of god, but bycause, whi­ther they wyl or nat, they be pricked with this thought (whiche euer amonge hathe recourse in their myndes) y there is a cer­tayne diuinitie or Godhed, at whose pleasure they stād or fal, beynge I saye therfore stryken with the opiniō of so great a po­wer, least they myght happen to sturre the same against them by their ouermoche negligence or despysīg: they gyue some maner of worship (such as it is) vnto this Godhed and power. In the meane season yet leadyng a moost beastly and lawles lyfe & [Page 3] castyng vp all studies and ende­uours of honestye and good be­hauour: they shewe thēselues excedyng careles and wonder­full recheles in despysynge the ryghtfull dome and sharpe sen­tence of god. And then, because they measure not god by his in finite maiesty, but by y loutishe and grosse vanitie of theyr wyt, they so departe and traytrously shrynke awaye from the trewe god. Wherfore with what care so euer they afterwarde busye them selues howe they maye worshyppe god, they are neuer the better, but labour in vayne, because they worshyp not the euerlastyng God, but the drea­mes, fansyes, & dotages of their [Page] herte in stede of god. But as for true religion & godlynes surely it standeth nat in feare, whiche wolde fayne indede flee the iud­gement of god, and therfore be­cause it can nat flee it, feareth it but it rather lyeth in trewe and syncere affection, in louyng god as a father, and fearynge hym with all reuerence as a moste drad soueraigne lorde, euermore imbrasyng his ryghteousnes & hatyng wors then deathe to of­fende his maiestie. So who soeuer is roted in thys godlynes and true religion dareth nat of hys owne brayne forge hym a god as he him selfe lusteth, but seketh the knowledge of y true god, euen at god hym selfe, and [Page 4] taketh him to be none other, thā suche as he sheweth and decla­reth him selfe to be.

What we ought to knowe of God.

SYth the very maiestie of god passeth y capacite of mans vnderstandyng, so farre that it is impossible for him to cōceyue it, it is expedient for vs to ho­nour rather his hyghnes, then rashely to serche it, least of suche incomprehensible lyght we be vtterly stryken downe. For this cause then, god muste be sought and searched out in his workes as by certayne foresteppes, for Goddes workes in scripture be [Page] called the shewes of thinges in­uisible, for as muche as they represente before our eyes suche thynges concernyng y lorde as other wayes coulde nat be seye. This I saye, not that god wold kepe our myndes in doubte, by vayne and voyde speculations, but that it is ynoughe for vs to knowe y true religion, I meane faithe coupled with the feare of god, and that the same is fyrste breathed into vs, nourished and strengthened only by god, for in this vniuersall ordre and cours [...] of thynges, we beholde the im­mortalitie of our god, frō whom all thynges flowe & haue they [...] begȳning, we se also his myght in that he made such a worke & [Page 5] vpholdeth y same, his wysdom in that he hathe set in so goodly ordre suche an infinite dyuer­sitie of creatures, & keapeth thē alwayes in the same to the es­chewyng of cōfusiō. We marke also hys goodnes, whiche was the very cause bothe that these workes were made, and that nowe also they stande sure and strōge, his rightwysnes in that so wōderfully he declareth hym selfe in defendyng the godly and punishing the vngodly, we per­ceiue also hys hyghe mercy, in that so gentylly he suffreth our wyckednes, to y intēt we shulde returne as his mercy giueth vs occasion to do. Here vpō myght we at large be enformed (as [Page] muche as were sufficiēt for vs) of Gods maiestie and goodnesse and what he is, but y our dul­nes is so greate & the eyesyght of our mynde so blount and da­selyng at so open a lyght. Ney­ther is it onely a blyndnes that thus causeth vs to stomble, but there is also suche a frowarde and cankred opiniō in vs, as in ponderyng the workes of God taketh euery thyng a mysse and cleane out of course, yea & tour­neth vp set downe all ye heuenly wysoome so eudiently appa­raunt in creatures. We muste therfore nedes come to Goddes worde, for in it, & by it (I meane in the holy scriptures) God is by his workes wonderous wel [Page 6] descrybed vnto vs, where the workes thē selfes be weyed and estemed not after our frowarde iudgement, but by the rule of the euerlasting truth. Here thā we learne that our God is the only and euerlasting fountayne of all lyfe, ryghtwysenes, wys­dome, power, goodnes & mercy, from whom lyke as without exception al goodnes dothe come, so all prayse ought worthely to be rendred to him as his owne. And by this meanes all thyngꝭ though they euidently appeare in euery seuerall parte bothe of heauen and earthe, yet to what purpose they serue, what they maye do, and vnto what vse we muste vnderstande thē, we shall [Page] easely espye whē we step downe to our selues, & consyder howe god setteth forth his owne lyfe, wysdome and power in vs, and howe he practiseth his ryghte­wysenes, goodnesse, and mercy towardes vs.

Of man.

MAn was fyrste made to the ymage & lykenesse of God, [...]. 1. that in all hys ornamentes and iewelles wher wt he was rychly decked of god, he shulde honour the maker of the same and wor­shyp hym with suche kyndenes as became him. But forasmuch as he, trustyng so muche vpon the excellencye of hys owne [Page 7] nature that he had quyte forgo­ten whence he came, and wher­by he was mainteyned, attempted to auaunce hym selfe aboue god, it was necessary he shulde be spoyled of all goddes benefi­tes wheron he was so folyshely proude, to the entent that wher­as he that was so rychely endo­wed of Goddes bounteousnesse thought scorne to know his ma­ker in hys felicitie, shulde nowe beyng naked and destitute of all his wealthe, learne to knowe hy ̄ in hys mysery. Wherfore so many of vs as be spronge of the sede of Adam, be borne very fleshe of fleshe, ye lykenee of God vtterly abolyshed and extincte in vs, so that nowe vpon what [Page] parte so euer of man we cast our eye, we can se nothyng, but that is vnpure, vnhalowed and ab­ominable afore god. For ye wys­dome of man being blynded and wrapte in infinite errours, with standeth alwayes the wysdome of god, his forwarde wyl full of corrupte affections, hateth no­thynge worse then gods ryght­wysnes his powers vntoward to all good workes run hedlong vpon all wyckednes.

Of free Wyll.

SCriptures euery where wytnesse that man is the seruaunt of syn,Ioan. [...]. Ro. 6. 2 Pa. 2. wherby is meant that his disposicion is so tourned from the ryghtwyse­nes [Page 8] of God, as he can neyther thynke, luste, nor employe hym to any thyng, but y is vngodly, croked, nawty and vnpure, for the harte beyng so in the inner partes enuenomed with ye poy­son of syn, can breathe nothyng but the fruites of synne. Yet it may nat be so taken, that man is forsed to synne, as by vrgent necessitie, for he synneth of hys propre and most ready wyl. But forasmuche as his affectiōs be corrupte, he vtterly abhorreth al ryghtwysenes of God, and gredely renneth vpon all kynde of wickednes. And so he is clene shut out from the free power to chose good from badde whiche they call free wyll.

Of synne and deathe.

SYnne in script [...]e, is called not so muche the corruption of nature, whiche indede is the heade spryng of al vyce, as ye ra­gyng lustes that spryng therof, yea the heynous abominacions that brast out of these lustes, as murther, thefte, aduoutry, and other lyke. Wetherfore sȳners euen from our mothers wombe be all borne to the wrathe and vengeaunce of God, and euer the elder we waxe, the more greuous iudgement we heape vpō vs, so that all our lyfe longe we go forwarde vnto deathe, for sythe it is no doubte but all ini­quitie is cursed of goddes ryght wysnes, what shall we wret­ches [Page 9] loke for at hys hande, but very confusion, for that bryng­eth his displeasure with it, for asmuche as we be pressed with so greuouse a burden of synnes and corrupted with so infinite drosse of vnclennes. Thys thought, thoughe it be hable to ouerthrowe a mā with the fear therof & euen dryue him downe with despayre, yet to vs it is ne­cessary, that we beyng thus striped of our owne ryght wysnes, destitute of all trustynge in our owne power, and put backe frō all hope of lyfe, maye learne to fall downe lowe afore the lorde knowyng howe beggarly we be of our selues, howe miserable, and very villaynes, and thus [Page] knowyng our owne wickednes, dishabilitye & fal that we maye gyue him all the prayse of holy­nes, power, and saluation.

By what maner we be restored agayne to lyfe and healthe.

FRom this knowledge of our selfe, so playnly shewing vs howe we be nothyng at all, (if it can earnestly settle in our hertes) there is a playne and redy way to a more true knowledge of God, yea he hym selfe hathe nowe opened vs the fyrste gate into his kyngdome, thus vnder mynyng the two moste noysom pestilences, I meane the vnre­gardyng of goddes vengeaunce [Page 10] and ye false trust on our selues. For then we begyn to lyfte vp our eyes vnto heauen, whiche afore dyd cleaue faste vnto the grounde, and we that afore reposed in our selues nowe thynke longe for the Lorde. That same lord & father of mercy although oure synne hathe deserued the contrary, yet for his vnspeake­able mercy of hys owne mere goodnes, sheweth hym selfe to the troubled and astonyed con­scieces, and calleth vs home a­gayn by what meanes he knoweth most expediēt for our weakenesse, from straieng to the right way, from deathe to lyfe, from perdition to sauegarde, yea and from the kyngdome of the de­uyll [Page] to hys owne kyngedome. Wherfore euen to so many as the lorde vouchsaueth to restore to y enheritaūce of his heauēly lyfe, he vseth such maner trade, that they beyng sore wounded in conscience by theyr synnes, and weryed with the burthen therof, myght be styrred to fear him. Fyrste of al therfore he gy­ueth vs his lawe, to exercise vs vnto that knowledge.

Of the lawe of the Lorde.

IN the lawe of god is delyue­red vs the most perfecte rule of all ryghtwysnes whiche we maye well call the euerlastynge wyll of the Lorde. For there in two tables hath he playnly and fully declared what so euer he [Page 11] requireth of vs. In the fyrste what worshyp his maiestie alloweth, and in the other what of­fices of loue be due to our neyghbour in fewe cōmaundementes he hathe expressed. Let vs ther­fore heare the lawe, which done we shall se what learnynge we muste take of it, and what truit we ought to gather therof.

Exod. xx.

I am the Lorde thy god, whiche haue brought the out of the lāde of Aegypt from the house of bōdage. Thou shalte haue no straunge Goddes afore my face.

[Page]ONe pece of this cōmaundemēt is in stede of a preface to the hole lawe, for whyles he affyrmeth that he hym selfe is the Lorde our God, he meaneth that he is suche one as hathe authoritie to cōmaunde, and to whose commaundementes we ought to obey. As he sayeth by his prophet.M [...]la. 1. If I be the father, where is loue? If I be the lorde, wher is feare? he also reherseth hys benefytes, to reproue our vnkyndenes, if we obey not hys voyce. For with the same good­nes wherby he preserued y people of the Iues ones out of the bondage of Egypt, dothe he al­so delyuer all hys seruaūtes frō theyr perpetual Egypt that is [Page 12] And where as he forbyddeth to haue any other goddes, he re­strayneth vs that we shuld not gyue that is gods dutie to any other, then to him alonely. He sayth therfore. Afore my face, wherby he declareth, yt he wyll not only be knowen as a god by outwarde confession, but also y he wyll be truely takē for the only god īwardely in hert. These thinges belong properly to god alone, which without sacrilege can be gyuen to none other, so that him onely we ought to ho­nour, in him to repose our trust and hope, him to thāk for what soeuer good and holy thing we haue, & vnto him to rendre all prayse of goodnes & holynesse.

Thou shalte not make thy self any grauen yma­ge / nor any lykenesse of any thinge / that is in heauē aboue / or ī erth beneth nor in the water / vnder the earthe. Thou shalte not bowe downe to thē / to worshype them.

LYke as in ye first commaū ­dement, god declared him selfe to be but one, so nowe he sheweth, what a God he is, and howe he wyll be honoured. He forbyddeth therfore to make him any lykenes. And the cause hereof he sheweth in Deut.Deut. 4: Esay 40. and in Esay: for that no bodyly sub­staunce can be resembled to a [Page 13] spirite. He further forbyddeth vs to honour any ymage as a thinge of holynes. Let vs lerne then y the worshypping of God is a spiritual thinge, for lyke as god him selfe is a spirite, so he woll be worshypped in spirite & trouth He addeth therfore an horryble thretnyng,Ioan. 4. wherby he wold we knewe, how greuously he is displeased wt the breache of this cōmaundement. (I am thy Lorde God.) This is af­moch as yf he should faye that he onely is the Lorde God, on whom we ought to hange and that he cā suffer none to be hys felowe, or matched with hym, y he wil also defēde his maiestie & glory yf any go about to transpose [Page] it to grauen ymanges or o­ther thinges & with such ven­geaūce as shal be neyther short nor sengle, but y shall reache to our childrē, our childrēs childrē and vnto their childrē also, euē as many as folowe theyr fa­thers wyckednes, lyk as again he setteth forthe euerlastynge mercy & grace to the godly and their ofsprynge also, euen to as many as loue him and kepe hys lawe. In thys thynge he sheweth vs the largenes of his mercy stretched forthe into a thousande generations, where as he assigneth hys vengeaūce to reache onely but to foure ge­nerations.

Thou shalte not take the name of thy Lorde God in vayne.

HEre he forbyddeth vs to abuse hys holy name in swerynge, eyther for folysh try­fles or to establyshe our owne lyes. Othes ought not to serue neyther to selfe wyll, nor plea­sure, but to very necessity, wher eyther the glory of God must be vpholden, or a thinge affer­med that belongeth to the fur­theraunce of our neyghbours. Utterly he forbyddeth vs to de file his holy name in any thing, but to vse it reuerently & wyth hygh dignitie accordinge to his holynes, whether we swere or what other worde so euer we [Page] speake of him. And for asmo­che as the principall vse of the takynge of gods holy name chiefly consisteth in callinge v­pon him: here we may vnder­stand that we haue a cōmaun­dement to call vpon him.

In conclusion he appointeth the penaltie, least those shulde trust to escape his reuengeaūce that haue abused the holynes of hys name by perturyes and blasphemous othes, and therfore addeth that the Lor­de woll not haue him vnreuen­ged that taketh the name of hys Lord God in vayne.

Remember thou kepe holy the sabboth daye.

[Page 15] WE haue marked three causes of this commaunde­ment, for it pleased God, vnder the quyete of the seuenth daye to gyue the people of Israell a fygure of a ghostly rest, where­in the fayth full ought to cease from their owne wyll workes, and suffer God to worke in thē. Seconde, he wolde also that one certayne daye were assig­ned, wherin the people shulde assemble togither to heare the lawe, and to do their honest ce­remonies. Thirdly God wolde that seruaūtes and suche as be at other mens commandement shulde haue one day to rest in, y they might haue some release of their labour. As touching y [Page] first cause, no doubte it ceased at the commynge of Christ, for he is the truthe, at whose pre­sence forthwith all figures and tokens vanysh, he is the body, at whose comminge, shadowes be left,Colo. 2 Therfore sayth Paul, the sabboth was but a shadow of a thinge to come, the trouth wherof he expoundeth, where he teacheth we be buryed with Christ,Rom. 6. that by hys deathe we myght dye to the corruption of our fleshe. Nowe this is not done in one day, but in the hole coursse of our lyfe it must be practised, vntyll at laste beynge vtterly dead in our selues, we maye be fylled with the lyfe of God. Christiās therfore ought [Page 16] not to haue any supersticiouse keping of dayes. But for as moche as the two latter causes ought not to be accompted with the olde shadowes, but serue a lyke for all tymes, therfore though the sabboth day be ab­olyshed, yet neuerthelesse a­monges vs euen at thys daye, this cōmaundement hath hys place, that at certayne dayes we shulde mete togither for the hearing of goddes worde, for ye breakinge of the mystical bread and for common prayers to be made, also that seruaūtes and workemen maye haue release from their labours, for it can not be brought to passe (our in­firmitie is so greate) that such [Page] assembles can be kept euery day. Wherfore for ye destroieng of supersticion, the Iewes sab­both daye is taken away, but for the kepinge styll of good or­dre and peax in the churche, an other day is assigned to that be houfe. Therfore as the trouth was gyuen vnto the Iewes vnder a figure, so it is set forth to vs without shadowes, Fyrste that all our lyfe longe we shuld practise a cōtinual saboth (that is to saye) a rest frome our wor­kes, that the Lorde by his spi­rite myght worke in vs. Se­conde, that we shoulde kepe the lawful ordinaunces of the churche appointed for goddes wor­de to be herde, for sacramen­tes [Page 17] to be ministred, and general prayers to be made. Thirdly that we shulde not vngentylly ouercharg our feruauntes and prentyses with worke.

Honour thy father and thy mother &c.

HEre is gyuen vs in com­maundement to haue a redy seruice of hert towardes our parentes, and other which in stede of parentes haue rule ouer vs by the ordinaunce of god, as the kyng and other his deputies, I meane that we em­brace thē wt al reuerēce, obedience, kyndnesse, and al the seruice we cā do. For this is the will of the Lord, that we shuld recom­pence those that brought vs [Page] into this lyfe with kyndnes for kyndnes. And it maketh no mater whether they be worthy or vnworthye to whome this honour is gyuen, for what soeuer they be, God hath set them ouer vs in stede of our parentes and heddes and wol we honoure them. yea thys is the first commaundemēt that hath any promes knit vnto it,Eph [...]. 6. as Paul saith wherin whiles God promiseth the blessing of this lyfe to those that honour their parētes with due reuerēce according to theyr bounden duetie, he meaueth also that his most certayne curse shall lyght on their neckes that be stubburne and disobedient to their parentes or other superi­our [Page 18] powers. But thꝭ one thing by ye waye is to be marked that we be not commaunded to obey them, but onely in the Lorde, we maye not therfore for theyr pleasure trangresse the lawe of the Lorde,Eph [...]. [...] for then we ought not to take them for our paren­tes and heddes, but for straun­gers which go aboute to with­drawe vs frome the obedience of our true father.

Thou shalt not kyll.

IN thys commaundement is forbyddē al violēce, force, wronge, and generally all ma­ner of trespace, whereby oure neyghbours body is hurt, for if we remēbre how man is made [Page] to the ymage of God, we ought to esteme him as an halowed thinge, so yt he cā not be distay­ned but ye ymage of God muste be distayned also.

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

HEre god dāneth all kynd of horedom and vnclean­nesse, for the Lorde hathe ioy­ned togither ye man and womā in the lawe of mariage onely. And wyth hys blessynge also hath he halowed that couple, goynge togither by hys autho­ritie Wherby it is manifeste, y all other ioynyng saue only in mariage is cursed before him Wherfore so many as haue not [Page 19] the gyft to refrayne, whyche is a singulear gyft and standeth not in mans power, let them case the intemperancy of their flesh with the honest remedy of mariage,Heb. 1 [...] for mariage is honorable amōges all men, but hore mongers and adnouterers god will iudge.

Thou shalte not steale.

VTterly we be forbyd one of vs to lye in awaite for the goodes of an other. For god wyl not, yt in his people be anye wrongful takinges, whereby y pore shuld be vexed & oppressed nor any disceytes wherby the simple shuld be cōpased about, Wherfore yf we woll kepe our hād [...]s pure & innocēt frō thefte [Page] muste refrayne aswel frome all craft and subteltie as from violent extorcions.

Thou shalte beare no false wytnes &c.

IN this cōmaundement the Lord damneth al sclaunde­rous checkes, tawntes, & euyll reapportes wherby oure bro­thers good name is appeyred, he forbydeth also al maner lyes wherby in any part oure bro­ther is hurte, for seynge a good name is more precious, then al other treasures, doubtles it can be no lesse hurtful for vs to be robbed of oure good name, then of our temporall goodes, for to the vndoing and spoylynge of a [Page 20] man a false wytnes, somtyme worketh more myschiefe then the violent force of handes Wherfore lyke as in the other commaundement aboue remē ­bred the hand had a restraynt, so in thys hathe the tongue.

Thou shalt not desyre thy neyghbours house / thou shalte not desyre thy neyghboures wyfe / nor hys seruaūte nor his mayde / nor his oxe / nor his asse / nor anye thynge that is thy neyghbours.

HEre the Lord maketh a restreynte vpon as manye as raunge ouer the lystes and [Page] boundes of charitie, for where as other commaundementes forbyd vs to do contrary to the rule of loue, this forbyddeth vs euen to thynke any suche thing in herte, Wherfore by this cō ­maundement be reproued ha­tred, enuye, and malyce, euen aswell as murdre in the other preceptes aboue rehersed, lust also and inwarde vnclennesse of hert be here condemned, aswell as horedome and aduoutrye in dede, And where in the other commaundement were restreynede robhery and gile, here is also couetousnesse plucked in by the bryddell, where afore all op­probriouse wordes were [...]e­strayned, here is also repreued [Page 21] malice of mynde it selfe. So we se here howe vniuersall a com­maundemēt this is, that extendeth so on euery syde. God re­quireth suche a wonderous af­fection and brotherly loue so fer­uent, yt by no lust he wyl haue it aryse against ye welth and pro­fite of our neyghboure. Thys is then ye pythe of this cōmaundement, that suche a studye and minde we ought to haue, yt webe incensed ne tychled with no maner of lust contrary to the lawe of charitie, and that we be redy wyth all our hert to yelde euery man that is his. Now, that muste we recken to be e­uery mans own, whych by our boundē duty we owe vnto him.

The pyth of the law

TO what purpose al the cō ­maundemētes of the law pertayne: sufficiently declareth Christe oure Lorde, where he sayth that the hole lawe is con­teyned in two principal cōmaū ­demes, that is, to loue the Lorde god wyth all oure herte, with all our soule, and with all our power, & to loue our neygh­bour as our selues, whiche ex­position he toke our euen of the selfe lawe, for the firste parte is red Deut. vi. and the other Le­uiti .xix.

What profyt commeth vnto vs by the Law onely.

LO here a true exemplar & president of the ryght and [Page 22] holy lyfe, yea a very perfecte y­mage of ryghtwysnes it selfe, so that yf any mā can inlyuing expresse ye law of god, the same can lacke nothinge to hys per­fection afore god, In so moche (as he hym selfe is wytnesse) he promiseth to those that kepe his lawe not alonly excellent prosperities and commodities of this lyfe (which be reckened Leuiti .xxvi. and Deut. xxvii.) but also the rewarde of euerla­stynge lyfe. On the contrary part he thretneth punyshment of euerlastynge deathe to those that haue not fulfylled what so euer he hath gyuen them in cō ­maundement to be done. Mo­ses also whē he had publyshed [Page] the law, called to wytnesse hea­uen and earthe, that he had set­forth to the people good and e­uyll, lyfe and deathe. Nowe where as he shew vs the waye of lyfe, we must se what profyt we haue by thys appoyntynge and shewynge of the waye. Ue­rely yf our wyl were al togither framed and bent vnto the obe­dience of gods wyll, then were the onely knowledge of the law ynough for our saluacion, but seynge oure nature beynge fles­shely and corrupte, warreth ly­ke an extreme aduersary aga­ynst gods lawe a thynge of the spirite, and is in nothing amen­ded by her good nurtur and in­structions, therfore the lawe it [Page 23] selfe whiche was vnto our sal­uation (yf it coulde haue had good hearers) is nowe become an occasion of synne and death, for asmoche as we be all cast & conuict as transgressours ther­of, So the more openly it de­clareth ye ryghtwysnes of god the more hemously dothe it vt­ter our wyckednes. And agayn the higher transgressiō the law hathe to laye to our charge, the more greuous iugemēt are we condemned to. Thus nowe the promyse of lyfe is vtterly takē awaye, and onely remayneth y curse and that vpon al our nec­kes by occasion of the lawe.

The law is meane vnto Christ.

[Page]NOwe thoughe the wye­kednes and damnacion of vs all be sealed vp and confer­med with witnesse of the lawe, yet this is not therfore done to the intent we shoulde fall into despayre, or in this extreme plū ge run hedlong to oure ownede struction, for the Apostell decla­reth vs all damned by iudge­ment of the lawe,Rom. 5. to thintent e­uery mouthe shuld be stopped, and all the worlde be brought vnder gods daunger. And yet the same Apostle sayth in an o­ther place that god hath shut vp all men vnder vnbelefe,Rom. 11. not to destroye all, nor to suffre thē to perishe, but to haue mercy v­pon al. The Lorde therfore will [Page 24] that we by ye law thus beynge warned of our owne weakenes and vnclennesse: shoulde take comfort vpō the trust of his power and mercye, and that in Christ, for whose sake he she­weth him selfe so tender & mer­cyfull a father vnto vs. In the lawe can it not be sene that he rewardeth but onely perfecte rightwysnesse, whiche all we [...]acke, where as otherwyse he is a strayght iudge of synnes. But in Christ his face is all ful of fauour & grace euen toward wretches and vnworthy syn­ners This so wonderfull a to­ken of his exceding, loue he she­wed vs by gyuyng vp his own sonne for vs, in whom he hath [Page] agaynst other he extendeth the rygorousnes of his iudgemēt, let vs suffer the cause to rest in his handes, for thys thynge he woll haue vnknowen vnto vs all, and that not without good skyll, for neither the dulnesse of ourewyt is hable to abide such a lyght, ne the sklēder capacitie of the same is in any part suffi­cient to conceyue so greate a po­wer of his wysedom, For verely here who so euer wyll attempte to aduaūce him selfe, not refreynynge the rashnes of hys wyt, shall fynde it true yt Salomon sayth,Prou. 50. whoso woll serche the maiesty: shal be oppressed of the glory. Let vs only determyne this wyth our selues, that this [Page 26] same ordinaunce of the Lorde, though it be secret vnto vs, yet it is righteous and holy, for yf he wolde destroye al mankynd, doubtles he maye of ryght do it. And surely in those whom he calleth backe agayne frome dā ­nacion: we can se nothinge but his hygh goodnes. Let vs thā conceyue with oure selues that the chosē be ye vessels of mercy, as they be in dede, and that the forsakē be the vessels of wrath and not but of a iuste cause. But of thē both we maye take occasiō and matter to aduaunce gods glory. Neyther yet shall we (as many men do) for a sure establyshment and knowlege of our saluaciō clyme vp to heauē [Page] and sawcely enserch what God hath decreed of vs afore the worlde began, whiche thought can no other thing do, but bring vs in a miserable doubte and trouble, But let vs rather be cō tent wyth the wytnesse wher­wyth ye Lorde hath sufficiently made our saluacion strong and sure, for lyke as in Christe were all the chosen euen as many as afore the foundatiō of the earth was layd,Ephe. 1. ordeined vnto lyfe: so is he ye person in whom resteth the assuraūce of our saluacion, yf we by faith receyue and em­brace him. For what other thīg do we serche in the election, but to be partetakers of the euer­lastinge lyfe? And this saluaciō [Page 27] we obteyne in Christe whiche was the selfe lyfe frome the be­gynnyng,Ioan. 1. and was made ruler ouer vs vnto lyfe, that all those that beleue in hym shulde not peryshe, but haue euerlastynge lyfe. Wherfore yf we possessinge Christ by fayth possesse also in hym euerlastynge lyfe,Ioan. 5. it is no point of oure charge to make any further enquirye of gods eternall counsell,Rom. 5. 1. 10. 3. Christe is not onely a glasse wherin gods wyl is represented vnto vs, but also an euidence wherin it is after a maner sealed vp for vs.

What is true fayth.

THe christiane fayth ought to be taken neyther for a bare knowledg of God, neyther [Page] yet for suche an vnderstandyng of scripture, as lyke a fansye flyeng here & there in the brayne▪ worketh no good mocion no [...] goostly affection in the herte, as whē commenly men conceyue in their heades certayne opini­ons of suche matters as seme to haue strong reasons to make with them. But it is a sounde & stedfast belefe of herte, wherby we safely rest aud staye our consciences in gods mercy promy­sed vs by hys gospell, for thus shall we well defyne what be­lefe is, yf we ernestly behold [...] y nature of gods promysses, whyche belefe so hangeth vpon the promesse hys propre foundatiō that yf ye take the promesse a­waye, [Page 28] it forthwyth fayleth & goeth to nought. Wherfore so longe as the Lorde offerethe vs hys mercy by hys promesse in the gospell, yf we faythfully trust thervnto we be counted in faith to receyue hys word.Hebr. 11. And thus doth the Apostle defyne fayth, where he saith, fayth is the grounde of thynges that be trusted vpon, and the proufe of thīges not sene, He meaneth that fayth is none other thing, but a certayne & sure possession of all suche thinges, as be pro­mised vs by God, & an euidence of thinges that as yet do not appeare, I meane of the lyfe e­uerlastyng, wherof we cōceyue an hope and an expectation v­pon [Page] the trust we haue in the goodnes of god so lyberally offered vs in his gospell.2. Cor. 15. And for as moche as al gods promyses are stronge in Christe, and after a maner performed and made good in him, it foloweth vn­doubtydly that Christ hym sel­fe is the euerlasting Butte and marke of oure fayth, in whome it may beholde all the ryches of gods depe mercye.

Fayth is the gifte of God

IF we well ponder and weye with our selues, how blynd thꝭ oure wit is and howe farre vnhable to attayne vnto Gods heuenly secrecies, & with what doubte and mystrust oure hert laboureth within vs, then shall [Page 29] we well perceyue howe farre faith surmounteth and passeth all oure naturall power, howe also it is a singuler and excellēt gyfte of God, For sythe that no man (as Paul reasoneth) is of secret counsell wyth mans wyll,1. Cor. [...]. but only the spirite of mā, whyche is in man, howe maye it be that man can haue any certayne knowledge of gods co­unsell? And for as moche as Gods open trouth is very weake amōges vs, in those thinges that here we se before our eyes, how shuld it be strong and sure, where god only promyseth those thinges that neuer were sene by eye, nor yet cōceyued in mās wytte? Now it is euident and [Page] playne that fayth is a lyghte­nynge of ye holy ghost, wherby our wyttes be lyghtened and our hertes established & streng­thened with a sure staye of con­sciēce, being throughly persua­ded in our selues that God of hys promyse is so true, fayth­full, and iuste, that he can not but performe what so euer he hath bounde him self to by hys holy worde and promesse. And for thys cause fayth is called y pledge or ernest because it set­teth oure conscience at the staye of gods trouth, It is also na­med a seale wherwith our har­tes be sealed & marked agaynst the daye of the Lorde,2. Cor. 1. Ephe. 1. Rom. 8. for the Lorde himselfe is he that bea­reth [Page 30] wytnesse to oure spirite yt God is our father and we his dere beloued sonnes.

In christ we he made rightuouse by Fayth.

FOr as moche as it is eui­dent and playne, yt Christe is the euerlastyng Butte, and marke of fayth, we can none o­ther wyse fele what profites & benefytes we take by fayth, thē onely by lokynge and hauynge a directe eye towardes him, for vnto this purpose was Christe gyuen vs of the father,Ioan. 17. that in hym we myght obteyne euer­lastynge lyfe as he hym selfe sayth, thys is the euerlastynge lyfe,Ioan. 11. euen to knowe one god the father, and whom he hath sent [Page] Iesus Christe. Also he saith, he that beleueth in me, shall not dye for euer, that yf he dye he shall lyue. But how maye thys com to passe? forsoth thus, we that be vncleane by reason of synne, muste be pourged and clensed in hym, for no vncleane thinge shal entre into the kyng­dome of God. Christe therfore maketh vs parteners and as ioyntpatentes wyth hym, so yt though of oure selues we be synners, yet for Christes rightwysnes we be accepted for righte­ouse at the iugement seate of god, And thus spoyled of our own rightousnes we be cladde, and endewed with Christes righteousnesse. So where as [Page 31] by workes we be vnrighteouse, by fayth in Christ we be made ryghteouse, I saye we be iusti­fyed by fayth, not that we haue any rightousnes within vs of our selues, but that Christes ryghtuousnes is counted for our rightuousnes, and our wic­kednes is nothing at al layde to our charge, so that, wyth one worde, we may call thys righ­tousnes forgyuenes of synnes. The Apostle clerely declareth thys,Rom. 10. Pilip. 3. whyles oftentymes he setteth the rightuousnes of wor­kes wyth the rightuousnes of fayth, and sheweth howe y one ouerwhelmeth and turneth the other vpsyde downe Nowe by what fashion Christe hath de­deserued [Page] vs thys ryghtousnes and in what partes it is conteyned ye shall se in the symbole of faith where euery Article seue­rally by it selfe shalbe orderly rehersed, whervpon is founded the hole belefe of a christen mā.

By Fayth we be halowed and as it were seasoned to the obedience of the law.

LYke as Christ through his rightwysnes is a meane for vs vnto God ye father, that he beyng as it were our suretie we be takē & reputed for ryght­wyse, so by the partakynge of his holy spirite he haloweth vs to all purenes and innocency. For vpon him rested the spirite of the Lorde aboue al measure, [Page 32] I meane the spirite of wyse­dome and vnderstandynge,Esa. 61. 12 of coūsel, strēgth, knowlege, feare of the Lorde, so that of hys plently & fulnes we all receyue and drinke vp largely grace for grace. They therfore be decey­ued that boaste theyr Fayth in Christe, where they be vtterlye voyde & destitute of the halow­ynge of hys spirite. For scrip­ture teacheth that Christe is not onely made our ryghtwys­nes,Iere. 31. but our halowyng also, for by the selfe same couenaunt yt the Lorde maketh wyth vs in Christ, he promyseth both to pardon our wyckednes, and al­so to wryte hys law in our her­tes. Therfore the kepynge of [Page] the law is no worke of our ha­bility, but of a spiritual power, wherby our hertes be pourged frome their corruption & made softe in the obedience of rygh­tuousnes. Now then the vse of the lawe to Christen men is a farre other thinge from that it shuld be without fayth, for whē ones God graueth in our her­tes a loue of hys ryghtousnes, then the outwarde doctryne of the lawe whyche before dyd no­thynge but accuse vs aswell of weakenes as of trangression, is nowe becomme a lyghte to our feete that we shoulde not straye from the strayght waye,Psal. 119. it is nowe our wysedō,Deut. 4. wherby we be enformed, and styred to al [Page 33] honestie,Psalm. 11 [...]. it is our nurtonre whiche woll not suffre vs to renne to moche at large in our selfe wyll and luste.

Of repentaūce and new byrth.

HErevpon it is easy to vn­derstāde,Mat. 3. and in other places. why repentaūce is alwaye ioyned wyth faythe in Christe, why also the Lorde affirmeth, that no mā can entre into the kyngdom of heauen ex­cept he be borne a newe,Ioan. 3. for re­pentaūce betokeneth a retour­nynge, wherby we byd the fro­wardenesse of thys world fare­well and repare agayne vnto ye Lordes waye. Nowe Chryste because he is not the ministre of synne, dothe washe away our synnes, and decke vs wyth [Page] hys ryghtwysnes to the intent we shulde not stayne thys hys grace wyth new fylthynes a­gayne, but ones chosen to be gods sonnes shulde consecrate and direct al our lyfe from hensforth to the glory of our father. Thys worke of repentaūce hā ­geth on our newe byrth,Rom. 6. Colos. 5. & alibi. whych new byrth, standeth vpon two partes, the sleynge of our flesh, I meane of thys corruption naturally spronge in vs, and a spirituall quyckenynge wherby ye nature of mans is restored to her clennes. wherfore vpō thys meditation we muste laboure & employ our selues al oure lyue lōge, that we ones deed to sinne and to our selues maye lyue to [Page 34] Christe & to his ryghtuousnes. And wheras this new byrth cā neuer be perfect so longe as we lyue in the pryson of thys mor­tall body, it muste nedes be that this same mynd and study of repentaūce ought styl to continue in vs euen vnto death.

Howe ryghtwysnesse of good workes and of faythe maye stande togither.

GOod workes that come of suche a purenes of consci­ence doubtles be stronge and al­lowed before god, For sythe god seeth his owne ryghtuousnesse in them, he can not but allowe them, yet must we take hede, least we beare oure self so hault in the vayne affiaūce and trust [Page] of our good workes, that we forget not how we be iustifyed by the fayth in Christ alonely. For there is no righteousnes of workes afore God, except it answereth to his rightousnes, so yt who so goeth about to be iusti­fyed by his owne workes, it is not ynoughe for hym, to brynge out one good dede or two, but he must shewe forth a perfecte obedience of the lawe, whyche thyng is farre awey yea frome those that seme moost of all to haue profyted & gone forwarde afore other in the Lordes law, Besyde thys although y rygh­tuousnes of god coulde be con­tent and pleased with one good dede only, and no mo, yet shulde [Page 35] not god fynde so muche as one good dede in all hys sayntes, yt worthely euē of the self workes deseruynge he myghte prayse and commende as rightwyse. For this is ye very trouth, seme it neuer so great a meruel, that no worke we do is perfect on e­uery syde, but is blemyshed wt some wart eyther in one parte or other Wherfore syth we be synners foyled with many remnauntes of vyces, we muste ne­des be iustified an other waye thā by our selfe. Now certeinly we haue alwaye greate nede of Christe, that by hys perfectnes oure vnperfectnesse maye be couered, by hys purenes oure vnclennes maye be washed by [Page] his obediēce our iniquitie maie be blotted out, fynally yt for his rightousnesse we maie befreely taken as rightuouse wtout any respect of our workes, whyche in no wyse can be of suche va­loure to stande in the iudgemēt of God. Thys notwythstan­dynge, so longe as these our spottes whyche other wayes myght blemyshe & stayne oure workꝭ before God, be thus hyd and kepte close, the Lorde con­sydereth in them nothynge but hyghe purenesse and holynesse, where vpon he vouchesaueth to gyue them hyghe tytles of prayses, for he calleth and also estemeth them euen ryghtous­nesses yea and promyseth vnto [Page 36] thē large rewardes. So maye we then shortly conclude that oure felowshyp wyth Christe is of such strength & force, that for it we be not onely freely re­puted ryghtuous but also our workes be reckened vs for iu­stice and ryghtuousnesse, and be aboundantly recompensed wyth an euerlastyng rewarde.

The Symbole of fayth or Christen Crede.

WE tolde you heretofore what profyte we take by our fayth in Christ, nowe shall ye heare, what our faith ought to beholde in Christ, & what to conceyue of him to the stablysh­ment and confermynge of it. Certaynely thys is declared in [Page] the Simbole or Christē Crede, as howe Christe is made vnto vs by his father our wysdome, raunsome,1. Cor. 1. lyfe, ryghtwysnes, and holynes. Nowe it maketh no greate matter, who was the maker of this Symboll, or by what personꝭ this abrydgeniēt of faith was set forthe, whiche in it hath no humane doctrine, but is gathered of most certain recordes of scripture. And be­cause no man shulde muse why we knowledge our selues to be­leue in the father, the sonne, & the holy ghoste, we woli some what speake hereof afore we entre into the Crede. When we name the father, the sonne, and the holy holy ghost, we make [Page 37] vs nat thre goddes, but in most symple and pure vnite of God, aswel the scripture as the very experiēce of godlynes shewe vs God the father, hys sonne and the spirite, so yt our vnderstan­ding cā not conceyue the father but it must also cōpryse aswell the sonne (in whome shyneth ye fathers lyuely ymage) & the spirite in whom his power and might is opened. In one God therfore let vs fyxe the hole thought of our mynd, and yet in the mean season cōsider y fa­ther wt ye sōne and his holy gost.

I beleue in one God the father almyghty maker of heauen and earth.

By these wordꝭ we be taught to beleue not nakedly that there is a God, but also to know that he is our God, and to trust that we be of the nōber of those whom he promyseth to be their God, whome also he taketh for his owne people. Thys God is called almighty wherby is meaned, that by his prouidence he disposeth al thinges, and at his pleasure gouerneth & through his power and myght ordereth them, when we cal him maker of heauen and earthe, we muste therwith vnderstande yt he cō ­tinually nourisheth, susteyneth and quyckeneth whatsoeuer o­nes he made.

And in Iesus Christ hys onely sonne our Lorde.

WHere aboue we sayd that Christ is he euerlastyng butte of our fayth, thys is easy to se, for as [...]ch as all ye partes of our he [...] be here represented in hym [...] call hym Iesus (which [...] was gyuen hym from heauen),Luc. 1. because he was sent to saue hys people frome theyr synnes.Act. 4. And therfore the scripture sayth yt there is none other name gyuen vnto men wherby they myght be saued. This additiō or surname christ betokeneth yt he was ānoynted and throughly endowed wyth all the graces of the holy ghost, whiche in scripture be rehersed [Page] vnder the name of oyle, because wythout thē through drought and barennesse we wyther and dekaye. Throughe this annoin tynge of the father [...]as he first made kyng, subdu [...] vnto him selfe all power in heauen and in earth, that in hym we mought also be kynges, hauyng power ouer the deuyll, synne, deathe & hell, So thē was he cōsecrated prest that through his sacrifice he myght pacifye the father & bryng vs in fauour agayn with hym, to ye intēt that in him we also myght be preestes, offryng vnto the father prayers, than­kes, our selues and all ours by thys same Christe, our media­tour and reconcyler. Further­more [Page 39] he is called y son of God, not as other faythfull men be by election onely and fauoure: but that he is the verye true natural sonne, & therfore is he na­med ye only, because he myght be knowen frome the rest. He is also oure Lord, not onely by hys godheade whyche he had euermore the selfe same wyth the father, but also in that selfe fleshe wherin he was exh [...]ited vnto us. For there is but one God, of whom be al thinges as Paule sayth, and one Lorde Iesus Chryst,1. Cor. 8 through whom be all togither.

Which was conceiued by the holy ghost / borne of the virgine Marye.

[Page] HEre we lerne by what ma­ner y sōne of God became our Iesus, that is our sauiour, and our Christ, that is to saye the annointed kynge to defende vs, and preeste to brynge vs in fauoure with the father, for he put vpō him our fleshe, to thys intente that he nowe made the sonne of man shoulde make vs the sonnes of God wyth hym, takyng vpō hym oure pouertie to aduaunce vs vnto hys ry­chesse, bearynge our weakenes to strengthen vs by his power, receyuynge our mortalitie to gyue vs his immortalitie, commynge downe vpon the erth to exalt vs vnto heauē. Borne he was of the virgine Mary euen [Page 40] because he might be knowē the very sonne of Abrahā and Da­uid whyche was promysed in the lawe and Prophetes a very mā, [...]. 1. like vnto vs in euery point,Ge [...]. 15▪ onely synne excepted,Esa. [...] he was tempted wyth our infirmityes to thintent he myght lerne to haue compassion and beare wt vs. Thys same Iesus was cō ­ceyued in the wōbe of y virgine by a wonderfull & vnspeakable power of y holy goste, to thintēt he myght be borne not defyled with any fleshy corruption, but be sanctified in most hyghe and perfecte purenesse.

Suffered vnder Ponce Pylate / was crucyfyed / dead & buryed / and descē ­ded vnto hell.

[Page] IN these wordꝭ we be taught after what sort Iesus paied our raunsome, for thys was cause why he was borne a mortal mā.Rom. 13. For verely where as god was ꝓuoked to wrath through the disobedience of man:Phil. 2. Iesus through his obedience put it a­waye, shewynge him obediēt to hys father euen vnto deathe. And so ī his deth he offred him selfe a sacrifyce to the father, wherby hys ryghtwysnes myght ones [...]or euer be appea­sed, wherby y faithful mought be halowed for euermore,Hebr. 7. 9 [...]nd. 10 wherby also the euerlastynge satis­factiō mought be fully wrough and fynyshed. He shed hys holy bloud for the pryce of our raun­some, [Page 41] to thintent both the fury of God whyche was kyndled a­gaynstRom. 3. vs myght be qwenched and also our wyckednes pur­ged.Ephe. 1. There is no parte of hys deth that lacketh a misterye.Colos. 1 He suffred vnder Ponce Pilate that is to wyt, he was condem­ned by sentence of a iudge,Esay. 3 [...] for a felon and euyldoer,Mar. 15. for this purpose yt we throughe hym thus condemned myght be quyte at the barre of the hygh iudge,Deut. 2 [...]. he was crucified,Gala. 3. that in the crosse whych by Gods lawe was cur­sed,Heb. 2. he shuld susteyne our curse, whyche curse oure synnes dyd deserue, he dyed, that throughe hys deth he myghte ouercome deathe that gaped vpō vs and [Page] henge ouer our heddes, and y he myght swalowe vp yt same death, whyche elles had not he bene, shuld haue swalowed vs vp.Rom. [...]. He was buryed to thyntēt we hys felowes by the vertue of hys deathe shulde be buryed to synne, enfraunchyshed from the dominion of the deuyll and of deathe. And where we saye he wente downe into hell, it is meāt he was extremely hādled of God, & that he felte the hor­ryble sharpenesse of gods iudgement in that he dyd put hym self betwene vs & Gods wrath, and on our behalfe satisfied the rygoure and sharpe iudgement of God, so dyd he paye & suffer the due paynes not for his own [Page 42] iniquite, for he hadde none in hym,Mat. 3. 1 [...]. but for our wyckednes.Lue. 3. 9. Not that y father was at any tyme angry agaynst hym (for howe coulde he be angrye with hys most deare sonne in whom is all hys delyte and pleasure? or howe coulde he be pacyfyed wyth hys prayer wyth whome he were displeased?) but in this sense we say he bare the weight of goddes rygorousnes, because beynge thus strycken and as it were scourged by the hande of God, he felte all the tokens and sygnes wherwythe god in hys fume is wonte to pu­nysshe synners, in so moche that when the Passion waxed stronge ouer hym,Mat. [...]71 he was con­streyned [Page] streyned to crye my God, my God, why hast yu forsaken me?

And the thyrde daye he rose agayne frome death / he ascended into heauen and sytteth on the ryght hande of God the father almyghty / frome thence he shall come to iudge the quycke and the deed.

OF Christes rysynge agayn we maye gather a sure trust of victorye,Act. 2. that we shall ouercome death, for lyke as he coulde not be holden downe by al y panges of death, but mightely dyd brast forth beyonde all deathes power, so dyd he re­presse and quenche all hys stin­ges [Page 45] and that in suche wyse, as he is nat hable to styng vs now any more, at leaste waye to our destruction.2. Cor. 15 So then his rising agayne,is fyrst a ryght certayn trueth and euen the grounde of our rysyng to come,Rom. 7. and also of this our presente quickenyng, wherby we be raysed vp vnto a newnesse of lyfe. By his ascē ­sion or mounting vp vnto hea­uen, he opened vs the way vn­to the kyngedome of heauen, whiche in Adam was agaynste all men shut, for he ascended in to heauē in our fleshe as it were in our name, to the intente that euen nowe in hym by hope we may possesse heauen, and after a maner syt euen amonges the [Page] heauēly sprites. And assuredly he is not there wtout our hygh profyte: for accordyng to the of­fice of his euerlastyng presthod he wēt into the sāctuary of god not made of mans hande, and there he laboureth as a conti­nual attourney and mediatour for vs afore the father, [...] where we saye he sytteth on the ryght hande of god the father, it mea­neth that he is crouned & pro­claymed, kynge, iudge, & Lorde, ouer al thinges, yt by his power he myght cōserue and gouerne vs that his kyngdome and glory maye be our strength, power and boaste against hel, It signifieth also that he hath receyued to dispose at his pleasure al the [Page 65] maye be made perfyte and fyl­led, that is to wytte, that his iudgement moughte be mani­fested,1. Cor. 15. in whiche daye he alone shall be sette vp on hyghe, and shall be all togyther in all men, gatherynge and receyuyng his faythfull into glorye, when sa­tans kingdom shal be brought to confusyon, & vtterly throwe doune.

The thyrde.
Thy wyll be done in earthe / as it is in heauen.

IN this petition we desyre of god that as he is wonte in heauen, so in erth he wo­vouchsaue [Page] to order and dispose all thinges, as his gracious pleasure shalbe, to bring euery thyng to passe as shall lyke his wisdom best, to vse al creatures at his own pleasure, and to subdue all wylles vnto his. And thus requyrynge, we vtterly refuse and abandon all our owne desyres, renouncynge and gy­uynge vp vnto the Lorde what so euer affection, wyl, or lust, is in vs, desyrynge his graciouse maiestie that he suffer not the worlde to passe with vs as we our selues wolde haue it, but that he cause all our matters so to go forwarde with vs, as he knoweth afore & forseeth beste for vs and as he hath appoyn­ted [Page 66] the same to be. Nor we do not onely here aske, that god wolde make our owne desyre voyde and of no effecte, euen so many as be contrarye and re­pugnant to his wyll, but also that he, extinguyshinge these our affections, wolde shape in vs new thoughtes, newe myn­des, and newe ententes, so that none other motion or luste be felt in vs, then a pure consente and ful agremēt with his wil, and for a conclusion that we woll nothinge of our selfe, but as the holy spirite woi in vs, by whose secrete instruction & tea­chinge, we maye lerne to loue those thinges that be pleasaūt to hym, and to hate & abhorre [Page] wors then deathe what so euer displease him. Nowe assured we are that displeaseth hym y is contrary to his worde and institucion.

Gyue vs thys daye oure dayely breade.

HEre in generall we aske of god all thynges neces­sary to the behouf of our bodyes vnder the clementes of this worlde, not onely to be fed and clothed, but, also what so euer thing he forseeth to be ex­pedient for vs to thintent ws mought eat our bread in peax. In this petition with few wor­des, [Page 67] we betake our selues into his kepynge, and commit vs to his diuine prouidence that he wolde fede, nouryshe and pre­serue vs, for y moste graciouse and tender father doth not dis­dayne to take vnto his kepyng and tuiciō also this our bodie, y he myghte exercise our fayth in these same lytell small thyn­ges, whiles we loke to receyue at his hande all thynges what so euer we haue nede of euen to a crumme of bread and a drop of water. Where we say Dayly and this daye, it meaneth that we ought onely to aske thinges sufficiēt for our nede, euen as it were for no more but this day: With this assured confidence [Page] that oure father, after that he hath nouryshed vs this daye, woll not fayle vs to morowe. Now how moch aboundaunce so euer of goodes through his benefite we haue, yet it beho­ueth vs to aske our daily bread thynkyng on this wyse, that all our substaunce is nothyng, but so farforth as god by powryng forth his blessynge, shall pro­spere and encrease, & that which is in our hādes is none of ours but so farforth as god bestow­eth it vnto vs and suffreth the vse therof in our handes frome tyme to tyme. In that we saye, Our bread, is hyghly declared the boūtyousnes of god, which maketh y to be ours, which by [Page 68] no reason was dewe vnto vs. Finally in that we desyre it to be gyuen vs, it is meant that it is the pure & free gyfte of god, frome whense so euer it come to vs, thoughe it seme neuer soo moche to be gotten by our scy­ence and propre industrye.

The fyfthe.
And forgyue vs oure trespasses / as we forgyue theym that trespasse a­gaynste vs.

IN this petition we aske release, pardon, and forgiue­nesse of synnes to be recey­ued at goddes handes, a thyng [Page] [...] [Page 68] [...] [Page] doubtles right necessary to all men and women without exception, And we call them dettes, (for so signifieth the greke and also the latine worde) bycause we owe god a punyshement for them as a pryce or peny worth due for the same. But by noo meanes can we make this pay­ment good, oneles we be dis­charged by this forgyuenesse whiche is the free pardone of his mercy. We aske this par­done to be gyuen vs, euen as we forgyue our detters, that is, as we spare them and forgyue them, of whome we haue bene in any thynge, eyther harmed, sharpely handled, or contume­liously checked. This condi­tion [Page 66] is here added, not that by our forgyuynge of other mens trespasses agaynst vs, we may or can deserue goddes pardon, but it is here put for a [...]ygne & token to acertayne vs, that so truely our synnes be pardoned vs of god, as we semblably in our owne consciences forgyue other, in case our hart be cleane purged and voyd of all hatred, enuye, and vengeaūce. On the contrary parte, we be warned that they be shakē of and expulsed frome the nombre of gods chyldren, so many as be redy to reuenge, harde to forgyue and that styffely beare malice in their hartes ayenst their neyghbours, For all suche are hereby [Page] monyshed not to be ones so hardy as to call god theyr father, nor pray to escape gods wrath, lyth in theyr own stomake they beare wrath and displeasure a­gaynste other. yea Chryste ex­pressely sayth,Mat. 6. that onles we for gyue men theyr offences, the father wol neuer forgiue vs ours Which thyng he also teacheth by the parable of the kyng and his seruauntes.Mat. 18. Finally he wol haue forgiue vs our neighbour not ones or twyse,Mat. 18. no not seuen tymes only, but seuenty tymes seuen tymes, meanynge herby, we oughte contynually frome tyme to tyme to forgyue oure brother.

The syxte.
And let vs not be led into temptation / but delyuer vs from euyll. Amen.

IN this demaūd, we do not requyre, that we shulde ne­uer fele temptations, for by them rather it is our profyte to be styrred and rubbed on the backe, lest through ouermoche rest, we mought waxe sloggar­des, for the lorde tempteth his chosen dayly, chastysyng them by reproche, pouertie, trouble, and other kyndes of crucyfy­enge. But this oure prayer is,1. Cor. 10. that with the temptatiō he wol make vs a waye out, so as we [Page] be not ouercome and pressed downe of any temptations, but that by his powre enstrengthe­ned we may stand sure agaynst all the power of our aduersari­es wherwith they assaulte vs. Also that we taken to his go­uernaunce, halowed by his spi­rituall graces, and fensed with his protectiō may stande styffe agaynste the deuyll, death, hell gates, and the hole kyngdome of the deuyll, and this is to be deliuered from euyll. We must marke also howe God wol that our prayers be shapen. Truely we muste shape them after the rule of charitie, for so hathe he taught vs to praye, not for our owne behoufe without any re­garde [Page 71] of our bretherne, but he commaūdeth vs to be euen as busye for theyr cōmoditie, edificatyon and profyte, as we wold be for our owne.

Continuance of prayer.

THis then it behoueth vs to loke vpon, that we go not about to bynd god to any circumstancies, lyke as we be taught in this prayer, nor to assigne him any law, or apoynt hym any condycyon. For afore we conceyue any prayer for vs, we fyrste requyre and forespeke that his wyll be done, whereby nowe we subdue oure wylle to his, that as with a brydell [Page] nowe restreyned, it shulde not p̄sume to force god to a course or trade. If our myndes ones brought to suche obedience, we suffre our selues to be ordred at tharbitremēt of gods prouisiō, easely we shal lerne to continue in prayer, and referrynge oure requestes vnto the lorde, pacy­ently to awayt his pleasure, be­ynge assured that god is alway present with vs, though it seme not so, and that when he seeth his tyme, he wol declare that he gaue no deafe eares to our praiers. That yf after longe away­tyng, our mynd cānot attayne what it hath profyted by pray­er, nor fele any frute goten therby: yet our fayth shall certyfye [Page 72] vs of that, that by felynge we coulde not perceyue, euen how we haue obteyned that expedi­ent was for vs. And thus shall faythe worke, that in pouertie we maye possesse aboundance, and in trouble comforte, for yf all togyther go to wreck & fayle vs, yet shal god neuer fayle vs, neuer forsake vs, sithens he can not disapoynte the awaytynge and longe suffraūce of his, him alone may we haue in steade of all thynges, for he cōteyneth in hym all goodnes, whiche with­out doubte in tyme to come, he woll shewe vs all at large and most fully.

Of Sacramentes, wherfore they properly serue.

SAcramentes be ordeyned that both before god and man they shulde be exer­cyses of our fayth. Before the lorde they exercyse our faythe, whyles they establysshe it in gods truthe, for where as the Lorde perceyued it expedyent for the ignoraunt of our fleshe, he dyd setforth heauēly myste­ries to be beholden vnder car­nall elementes. Not that any suche powers be gyuen to the selfe natures of thynges, as be propowned to vs in sacramen­tes, but that by the lordes word they be signed hereunto. For y promesse cōmeth alwaye afore, [Page 47] whiche promes is conteyned in the worde, then foloweth the token to strengthen & seale the promesse, & to make it of more authoritie amonges vs, euē as the Lorde forseech, that it is ex­pedient for the capacite of oure weakenesse. For vndoubted so smal and weake is oure faithe, that except it be propped vp on euery syde, & born vp by al meanes and wayes possible, anone it wolle qwayle, be shaken a peeces, and ouerthrowē. Nowe this fayth is also amonges mē exercised by sacramentes, why­les by the same it goeth opēlye to shewe her selfe to the worlde, and is styrred vp to render due prayses to the Lorde,

What a sacrament is, and how many there be.

A Sacramēt is therfore properly an outewarde signe, wherin God representeth and wytnesseth his good wyll towardes vs, to susteyne the weakenesse of our fayth. Or an other waye more shorte & also more playne, A sacrament is a wytnesse of gods fauoure, de­clared by an outwarde sygne. Now there be dyuers holso me sacramentes in the church, and namely seuen recounted of the fathers, Matrimonie, Baptis­me, Confirmation, Penaunce, Eucharistia comonly called the sacrament of the aultare, Or­ders, [Page] and extreme vnction.

Matrimonye,Wedolcke god hym selfe did fyrste institute in paradyse,Gene. 1. and saynt Paule calleth it ho­norable in all thynges.Hebre. 13.

By penaūce we atteyne the hyghe benefite of absolution,Penaūce neyther oughte we to neglecte the power or keyes of the chur­che, sythe to it Chryste sayeth, Whose synnes so euer ye for­gyue shalbe forgyuen,Iohan. 20. & whose synnes ye reteyne shalbe retey­ned.Luc. 10. And agayn he saith, Who heareth you, heareth me.

The sacrament of orders,Order. is wherby, by layeng on of y handes, persons of suche qualities and condicions, as Paule de­scribeth to Timothie1. Timo. 3. and TiteTit. 1. [Page] shulde be called and elected not only to ministre sacramentes but moche rather to preache gods worde purely & syncerely to the people.

ConfirmationConfyr. and extremeExtreme vnction. vnction the auncient fathers of the churche takyng occasion and groundyng themselfes v­pon the doynges and actes of thappostles haue receiued. But of baptisme & Eucharistia bycause they be the principall sacramentes & in the new testa­ment instituted expressely by Chryste hymselfe, I intende somewhat more at large to in­treate.

Of Baptisme.

BAptisme is gyuen vs of God, bothe to serue oure faythe before hym, and to serue our professiō before men. Fayth hath eye to the promyse, wherby the mercyful father of­ferethe vs the felawshyp of his Christe, that we endowed with hym myghte be partakers of his goodes. And two thinges it chiefly representeth vnto vs, the clensynge, [...]urgation. whiche we haue in Christes bloude, and the [...]leynge of our fleshe,Mortificatiō. whiche we haue obteyned throughe his deathe. For the Lorde cōmaū ­ded his to be baptised into re­myssyon [Page] of synnes.Ephe. 5. And Paule teacheth that the churche is ha­lowed of Christ her spouse, and washed in the lauer of water in the worde of lyfe. Further­more he declareth that we be baptysed into Christes deathe,Roma. 6. buryed with hym, to thintēt we might walke in newnes of lyfe, wherby it is not meaned that the cause or power of clensyng and of newe byrth is in the wa­ter, but onely that in this sacrament is perceiued a knowledge of suche gyftes: when we be ac­counted to take, obteyne & pur­chase that, whiche we beleue to be gyuen vs of the Lorde, whither we fyrste espye it, or whyther it were knowen to vs [Page 67] afore, and be here more certaynly enformed of the same. Nowe as touchyng our profession be­fore men, this Sacrament also serueth, for it is a marke or to­ken wherby we openly professe that we wyll be accompted a­monges the people of god, that with all other godly personnes by lyke relygion we worshyppe that same one god. Syth then in Baptysme the couenaunt of the lord is specyally made with vs: therefore of good ryght we baptise also our infauntes in that they be felowes and partakers with vs of the euerlasting couenaunt, wherein the Lorde promyseth hym selfe to be the God and graciouse lorde, not [Page] to vs onely, but to oure seede also.

Of the lordes souper, or sacrament of the aultare.

UNto what ende the my­stery of this sacrament,1. Cor. 11. whiche saynt Paule calleth the lordes souper, & is called of the fathers Eucharistia and Sy­naxis, was ordeyned, & wher­vnto it serueth, the promesse there added euydētly declareth which is to acertayne vs, that the lordes body was ones so of­fered, so betrayed for our sakes that now it is ours, yea and e­uermore shall be, and that his bloude was ones so sprynkled [Page 78] and shed for vs, that it shulde be ours for euermore. The bo­dyly eye seeth but the sygnes & figures of bread and wyne, but the inwarde eye of fayth vnder those signes seeth how the lord gyueth the true partakynge of his body and bloude, For all thoughe he beynge now taken vp into heauen, kepeth his re­sidence in heauen and no lon­ger in earthe, I meane in personall and humayne lykenes, yet no distaūce of place can let him to fede his faythefull with his owne selfe, & so to worke that they (thoughe heauen & earthe be neuer so far asunder) shulde yet haue moste presente felow­shyp and companye with hym. [Page] And hereof haue we a lesson gyuen vs in this sacrament so certayne and manifeste, that we muste fastly beleue that chryst with all his rychesse is here gy­uen and presented vnto vs, no lesse then yf he stode euen personally present, to be sene as he is in his maiestie with our eyes & to be felte with our handes, yea and that with suche power and myght, that not onely he bryn­geth to our soules an vndoub­ted truste of euerlastynge lyfe, but maketh vs sure also of the immortalitie of our flesh beyng quyckened of his immortall fleshe, & after a maner takynge part of his immortalitie. Wherfore vnder the sygnes of bread [Page 66] and wyne be presented and mi­nistred vnto vs the body and bloude, to thintent we myghte lerne y they be not onely ours, but also serue vnto vs for lyfe and nourysshyng. Thus when we se this most sacred and my­sticall bread, anone we must cō ceyue this similitude, that lyke as breade nourysheth, sustey­neth, and preserueth the lyfe of our natural body: so is the bo­dy of Chryste the fode, comfort, and defence of our gostly lyfe. When we se the forme of wine, loke what profyte wyne bryn­geth to mans bodye, the same muste we recken, spyritually to be brought vnto vs in Chry­stes bloude. Now, this mystery [Page] as it is a proufe and declaratiō of the great bounty of God to­wardes vs: so it ought to mo­nysshe vs, that we be not vn­kynd for the same his goodnes and excedyng liberalitie shew­ed vnto vs, but rather as oure duetie is, auaunce the same wt prayses, and magnifye it with thankesgyuyng. And further­more that we shulde embrace one of vs an other with suche an vnite, as we se the membres of one body knyt and fastened amonges theym selues. For there can be no quycker spurre to sturre brotherly loue amon­ges vs, then whiles Chryste, thus gyuynge hym selfe to vs doth not onely allure vs by his [Page 80] exemple, euery one of vs frely to yelde and gyue hym selfe to other, but also lyke as he ma­keth hym selfe commune amonges vs all, so in hym he maketh vs all to be as one. But wolde god we wolde lerne to measure & to contemplate in our mynde the greatnes of this so hyghe a sacrament gyuen vs of god. wolde god I saye we consyde­red howe fowle a synne ingra­tytude is, how horrible peynes and punishemētes do ensue of the vnreuerent handlynge and ꝓhanation of this sacramēt. Neither is it to be thought y those moste graue thretninges y s. Paule pronounceth be fru­strat & voyd.1. Cor. 11. For thus he saith. [Page] Wherfore who so euer eateth this bread and dryncketh the cuppe of the lorde vnworthely, shall be gyltie of the body and bloude of the lorde. Let a man therfore examine hym selfe and so let hym eate of that breade & dryncke of that cuppe. For he that eateth and dryncketh vn­worthyly, eateth and dryncketh his owne damnation, not de­cernynge the body of the lorde.

Of the Pastors and herdmen of the churche, and of theyr power.

FOr as moche as the lorde wyll that bothe his worde and the Sacramentes be mi­nistred [Page 71] by men vnto vs: it be­houeth Curates or herdmen to be set in offyce ouer the church, which with pure doctrine may enforme the people bothe pry­uely and apertly, ministre Sa­cramentes, and with good ex­emple instruct men vnto holy­nes and purenes of lyfe. Who so despiceth this institution & this order, be vnruely and dis­obedient not agaynst men but agaynst god, in that they facti­ously withdrawe them selues from the felowshyp of the churche which without this ministe­rie, by no meanes can stande, for that hath no lytell authori­tie, that the Lorde ones witnessed, sayenge, that he hym selfe [Page] [...] [Page 71] [...] [Page] is receyued, when they be receyued, [...] and that he is caste oute, when they be caste out, And to thintent theyr office shulde be no vyle thynge ne vnregarded, they be endowed with a special commaundement of byndynge and loosynge, [...] hauynge therto a promesse, that what so euer in earthe they bynde or loose, [...] 20. the same is bounde and loosed in heauen. And Chryst hym self expounynge his worde decla­reth that to bynde, is to holde synnes, and to loose, is to re­lease them. Nowe by what fas­shyon they loose, the apostle ex­pouneth, when he saythe, [...] that the gospell is a power to saue euery beleuer. Agayne what [Page 81] waye they bynde, he declareth when he saith that the Apostles haue a redy vengeaūce against all disobediēce.2. Cor. 10. For the summe of the gospell is that we be īer­uauntes of synne and death, & that we be losed and made free through the raunsome whiche is in Chryst Iesu, and as many as do not receyue hym for their redemer, be bounde with newe bondes of a greater condemnation. But we muste remembre that all this power which scripture gyueth to pastours and byshoppes is conteyned within the mynistery of the worde, for Chryst gaue not properly this power to men, but to his word, ordeynynge men onely the my­nisters [Page] thereof. Wherefore in goddes worde whereof they be made disposers & layers out, boldely let them ieoparde euen all thynges, and constreyne all the power, glory, and pryde of the worlde to stowpe and obeye vnto it, by it let them cōmaund all men, from the hyghest to the loweste, let them buylde Chry­stes house, pull down Satans kyngdom, fede the shepe, staye the wolues, teache and exhorte those that wyll lerne, reproue the stubberne: but all togyther in the worde, from whiche word yf they swarue to theyr owne dreames, and fanses: they be no longer estemed for pastours and shepeherdes, but rather [Page 82] (for asmoche as they be pestilē wolues) ought to be dryuen a­waye and deposed. For Chryste commaundeth none other to be hearde, then suche as teache vs the thynges that they haue ta­ken of his worde.

Of mens traditions.

SIthe we haue a generall sentence of Paule,1. Cor. 14 yt all thynges in thassembles & churches should be done co­mely & in good order: ciuile or­dinaūces, wherby as with bon­des an order and comly fasshy­on is kepte in the companye of the Christians, and a con­corde thereby conserued, ought not to be reckened amonges [Page] mens traditions: but must ra­ther be referred vnto the rule of the Apostle, so that they be not beleued as thinges neces­sary to our saluation, nor bynd the consciences to any superstition through them, nor be kept as any worshyppynge of god, nor that any holynes be repo­sed in them. But such ordinaū ­ces as vnder a tytle of spiritu­all lawes be thruste vpon vs, to bynde oure consciences, as thynges necessary to gods ho­nour, all suche lawes I saye ought we earnestly to resyste, for they do not only ouerthrow the libertie whiche Christ pur­chased vs, but also dymme the true relygion, and defile gods [Page 83] maiesty, who alone wol raygne in our consciences by his word Let this then abyde for a sure gron̄d,1. Cor. 3. that all thinges be ours and we Chrystes, and that god in vayne is worshypped where be taught doctrines,Mat. 15 the com­maundementes of men.

Of excommunication.

EXcōmunication is, wher­by notable horemongers, aduouterers, vsurers, ex­tortioners, spoylers, rouers, pyrates, brallers, ryoters, dron­kardes, seditious persons, wa­sters, after they haue ben admonished, and do not amende, be reiecte and banysshed from the [Page] company of the faythfull,Mat. 18. ac­cordynge to the lordes cōmaundement, not that the churche casteth them vnto perpetuall ru­yne and despayre, but it dain­neth theyr lyfe & maners and excepte they amende, the chur­che ascerteyneth them of theyr damnatiō. This order is ther­fore necessary amōges the faithfull, that sith the churche is the body of Chryst, [...]. 1. it ought not to be defyled with such stynkyng members, which redounde vn­to the shame of their head. And moreouer least by company of suche a naughty sorte (as it cō ­monly chaūseth) the good also myght he corrupte, It is also profitable for them selues, that [Page 84] their lewdnes be thus chastised which, where as other wayes by sufferaunce, they wold waxe more wilful and obstinate, now dryuen thus to shame, myghte lerne to amende, whiche thyng yf they can be wonne vnto, the churche gentyllye receyueth theym into her felowshyppe a­gayne, and to the partakynge of that same vnite, from whens they were banysshed and shut out. And least any man should proudly despyse the iudgement of the churche, or lytell regarde that he by the churche is thus condemned, the Lorde wyt­nesseth that this iudgemente of the faythfull is none other thynge then the publysshynge [Page] of his owne sentence, [...] and that it is approued in heauen, what they do in earth.L [...]c. 10. For they haue gods worde, wherby they may damne the froward, they haue agayne Gods worde whereby they maye receyue those that retourne vnto grace.

Of ciuile rulers and gouernours.

THe Lord wytnesseth, that not onely he allowed temporall gouernaūces and the office of magistrates, but also for that with suche hono­rable auctoritie he setteth forth theyr dignitie: hyghly he com­mendeth the same vnto vs, for [Page 85] he assureth vs y it is the worke of his wysdome, that kynges raygne,Pro. [...]. that counselours dis­cerne iustyce, that the honora­ble be iudges of the erth, yea & otherwhyles he callethe theym goddes, bycause they supplye and exequute his rowm,Psal. 82. In an other place also they be reapor­ted to exercyse iudgement euen for god and not for man.Deut. 1. Fur­thermore Paule recyteth the offices,2. Par [...] [...]. amonges the gyftes of god,Rom. [...]. and where as he maketh a longer treatye of them, he manifestly teacheth that their power is the ordinaūce of god, & that them selfes be ministers of god to the prayse of the weldoers, and to the vengeaunce of the [Page] [...] [...] in [...] me [...] to [...] gods [...] yea all [...] they hyther­ [...] [...] employe, that [...] the vniuersalle [...] true religion with [...] or spot, that they [...] the people with good [...], [...] that bothe openly and and pryuately they procure the weale, cōmoditie & rest of their dominions. This can not be done but by iustice and iudge­ment, which two thynges espe­cially be cōmitted vnto them of the prophet Iustice is to mayn [Page] [...] [Page] [...] [Page] his heauenly myste [...] [...] [...]crete counseles [...] [...]arye to monissh [...] [...] when they come [...] scryptures [...] with [...] and pleasau [...] [...]

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.