DIFFERENCES IN MATTERS OF RELIGION, BE­tweene the Easterne and Westerne Churches.

Wherein the Romane Church may see her selfe charged with as many Errours, as shee falsly layeth to the charge of other Churches in Europe.

Gathered by Irenaeus Rodoginus.

Ioan. 15.17.

[...].

LONDON, Printed by AVGVSTINE MATHEVVES for Iohn Budge, and are to be sold at the signe of the Windmill in Britaines Burse. 1625.

TO THE RIGHT HO­nourable, and most magnani­mous Patterne of inuincible courage, my singular good Lord and Patron, George, Earle of Engie, Lord Gordon and Badenocht, Sonne to the thrise-Noble and Puissant, L. George, Mar­quesse of Huntley, Earle of Engie, L. Gordon and Badenocht, Sheriffe principall of Aberden and Invirnesse, L. of Oboyne and Strathaune, Baron of Achindowne, Melgon and Gartly, &c. all increase of honour in this life, and eternall happinesse in the life to come.

TO lay aside (right Honourable) all the officious com­plements, vsed by most men now a­daies to make way for the purcha­sing of the fauour of high and e­minent [Page] Personages; What your Lordship is to me, J my selfe know best: neither will J expose it to the view of Buyers, it being vn­vendible, yea, vnestimable. J offer to your Lordships favoura­ble Patronage this little Treatise of lamentable Dissentions, neuer (for ought I know) heeretofore collected into one Packet: and as yet rather a Rapsodie, then a Methodicall Relation of Diffe­rences. Your Lordship loueth V­nion; This emboldeneth me. Your Lordsh. hateth Schisme, for which I heartily thanke God, beseeching him vpon the very bended knees of my soule, that you and all such, eminent in Learning, Wisedome, and Pietie, may by all meanes [Page] possible endeauour to helpe to pull downe these ill-composed walls of Schisme, and to reare vp the beautifull and long-desired wall of Peace. God preserue your Honour, increase your Wealth, and restore you fully to your for­mer Health.

Your Lordships daily Orator, in all duetie and good affection most humble, Irenaeus Rodoginus.

To his most louing Master, I. R. the Contriuer of this Worke.

HEre Schismes, and rents, and breaches manifold,
(With weeping eyes, which now I doe behold)
Thou hast layd out before the view of men,
With thine exact, and Peace-desiring Pen.
Well dost thou wish, for which I wish thee well:
Yet wishing doth not fiery darts repell.
But, Oh that Kings and Potentates their best
Would doe, and so yeeld to thy sweet request:
Then should Peace shine, and Gordian knots now fast
Dissolued bee, and into Lethe cast.
Misonices Renatus.

THE PREFACE TO THE READER.

CHristian Catholicke Reader, (whosoe­uer thou art) hauing taken some paines in collecting these differences, I recom­mend vnto thee, the vsing & perusing of them. Come with a minde voide of preiudice, and behold the schisms of the Church, the lamentable and pi­tifull ruine of Christian people; vn­lesse men by speedy repentance and earnest deuotion to God, the Authour of peace and concord, preuent these sure imminent perils and dangers. The coate of Christ is rent, his garment [Page] is torne in peeces, the world is dis­tracted and distempered with the rag­ing waues of opinion. Some Church­men, either in ambitious and extra­uagant thoughts are become furious, giuing out idle fancies for sound and solid nourishment;Iere. 14.14. (the Prophet cal­leth them false visions and the deceite of their owne heart,) or else (as it is e­uer in schisme) are misled, yea rather muzled by preiudice: so that there is no sauce, (be it neuer so sweete) which can taste well to their pre-ocupied pal­lats, but only that, which relisheth the venemous gall of bitternes, whereby they may worke the bane and vtter ouerthrow of them which are of a contrary mind▪ the first sort of these men are led to foster Schisme against conscience; to maintaine themselues in Dignities, Wealth, Peace and Pro­motion. Of which is a number of the learned'st, and most polliticke Chri­stian Prelates, Cardinalls, Doctors, [Page] and Preachers in the Romish Church. The second is hurled forward, with­out any respect, only blowne vp with foolish zeale lacking knowledge; so that there is not a moule-hill this day in Religion betweene the one side and the other, which to them seemeth not to bee an high mountaine. They can see nothing but through perspectiues, making things a far distant seem to be very neere. Or rather they behold the controuersies of Religion, as they doe the Moone in the Horizon, which see­meth to bee a great deale bigger, (though more distant thē the Zenith) then when shee hath iournied a good way in her course. And that, because of the transparant and watrish bodies of the Clowdes interiacent, which di­uide the rayes of their sight, and let them not behold that luminous body in rei veritate, as it is, but so farre as they can: till the impediments be re­moued. The first sort, though their [Page] power and meanes be greater, yet their action is lesse; nor yet is it so rigorous in playing a part in this dolefull Tra­gedie of Church and State deuision: seeing preferment breedeth emulation from without, and arrogancie as a do­mesticke and indiuiduall Achates, which let neuer the giddy multitude so doat and admire their actions, as that they can lead by their carriage this wild and vntam'd Colt, to be the Or­gan of vpholding Schisme and idle o­pinions. The other sort despising (as it were) dignities, misregarding mo­ney, leauing Father and Mother, Wife and Children, yea all things (so they say) for Christ and his Gospell, (well) take themselues either to a speculatiue and retyred life; and so they shunne the thunderbolts of enuie and hatred; or else they choose an actiue kind of life, to preach the Word in pulpits, to teach it in Schooles, or to giue priuate informations in doctrine and man­ners, [Page] by conference, disputations, rea­sonings, by writing to those, who are farre distant from them, and by lea­uing monuments of their diligence and industry to future ages, for eter­nizing their name and pofession. Both these sorts bring admiration, admira­tion enquirie, enquirie notice of the reasōs of their doings, notice breedeth liking of their persons and profession, (especially whē the dunghill of foolish and idolatrous opinions is lustred & guilded with the glistring colours of Rhetoricke, which in the eares of Ig­norance soundeth as sweete, as the harmonicall concords of the sweetest-breasted Quiristers.) Liking of the pro­fession is that, which maketh men now a daies runne to all these heady courses, to murder & massacre poore Christians, to ruinate Cities, dispeo­ple Kingdomes, kill Princes, inuent Gunpowder Treasons; yea what not? And doe the inuentors of these mis­chiefes, [Page] & deuisers of diuersitie, with the vpholders thereof, come first vpon the Stage to act the Prologue of these turbulent Tragedies? No surely. They lie securely all the night long in their beds, in the day time they meditate quietly in their closets how to vphold these pretty tricks, when as the poore Christian world is trauelling thorow moore and marrish, casting ditches and Trenches to defend or offend. And finally the common-wealth is the in­strumētall cause led by the circlings of these vpper powers, in zeale and igno­rance to rippe out her bowels from her belly. Good Lord Iesu! when shal these endlesse & needlesse iarring haue an end? when shall the Church Ca­tholicke liue in vnion of Faith, and communion of Charity? When will the Romish Cleargie lay aside (yea rather banish to Hell) preposterous (yea rather hellish) meanes, vsed for the obtaining of secondarie ends, Ho­nour [Page] and Lucre: for which they so maintaine the lamentable rent of the Christian world? Good Iesu! when will the Laytie (the wiser and lear­neder sort I meane) see with cleere-sighted eyes, and vnderstand with minds free of preiudice; how they are hood-wincked in an implicit and heart-tongue-tyed faith, beleeuing all things, yet beleeuing nothing; seeing they know not what they beleeue; being like that mad franticke fellow in the Poet, who thought hee was sound in health, though possessed with a deadly ague? Poore people the Cler­gie must instruct you; but you should be Berians; the Clergie must direct you in materia fidei: yet, you ought to enquire for via trita & regia, the common path, the by-wayes of opi­nions of Schoole quiddities, and imma­ginary scar-Crowes, (heresie, to their conceite) and (as they informe you) the contrarieties in matters indefini­ble, [Page] the positiue resolutions of matters coniecturall; yea of some things that are not, haue not beene, nor euer shall be, haue so marred the Christian peo­ple: that now adayes most men are become Laodiceans, (not in matters of opinion, which would to God all men were, but in things most necessa­rie to bee done and beleeued) neither hot nor cold. The rest in the fierie hu­mour of contention, thinke verily that it is impossible that their brethren should be saued, if they keepe their o­pinion, whereas their brethren are more assured of their owne saluation then they of theirs, though they thinke that they haue their saluation sealed by a most euident and manifest demonstration.Heb. 10.30. O cruell madnesse so to incroach vpon Gods propertie, who saith, Ʋengeance is mine, and I will repay. In whose hands is life and death, who only in his secret Cabinet hath ouer­ruled Fate, fortune, and all the vnpro­fitable [Page] diuination of these perempto­rie diuinators, who likewise keepeth cursing and blessing to himselfe. Where is that wonted charity, when it was said, if any man thinketh other­wise, God shall reueale it. Origen Hom. 5. in Leuit. saith that there bee some doctrines in Scripture so secret, that euen Priests shall not find them out. But that golden sentence of Saint Au­gust. in Genes. ad. lit. lib. 6. Cap. 9. must be euer in my mouth and in my heart, Ea moderatio est seruanda, vt in profundo scripturae sensu, praestemus diligentiam re­quirendi, quam affirmandi temeritatem, as for the deepe meaning of Scripture, we must be of such a moderation, that wee may rather seeme to be diligent searchers then bold and rash in affir­ming. Cyr. Alex. contra Anthrop. C. 2. Subtiles eiusmodi at (que) admodum tritae quaestiones non tam demonstratione dogma­tica, quam dubitatione & discussione con­iecturali indigent, such subtil questions [Page] stand more in need of doubting thē of demonstration. And so he endeth Quae­cunque ergo sacra scriptura non dicit a­pertè, latere oportet & silentio praeterire, whatsoeuer things the Scripture spea­keth not plainely, they must not bee expressed, but rather past ouer with silence. If this moderation of iudge­ment this day were in the Christian Churches; Greeke or Romish, should the Turkish tyrannie of the faithlesse Ottoman, so ouer-rule the flourishing and most famous part of Christen­dome? Could the sworne enemies of Christ erect their blasphemous Syna­gogues and Mahumetan worship, euen in the gorgious and stately Ori­entall Basilicks? Should Constantinople that Queene of beauty and once Prin­cesse of Europe, now bee a denne of Dragons and a mansion of Infidels? Should the inuincible Islands of Hel­lespont, Aegaeum, & Mediterranian Seas guarded by Nature wonderfully, with [Page] Rocks and steepe Mountaines for walls, with the waues of the Ocean beating their sides vncessantly for ditches: Should they (I say) now bee subiect to that monster of Man-kinde, terrour of the Earth and waster of Christendome? Paul to the Philippi­ans sheweth the reason, Euery man see­keth his owne things; and not the things of Christ. This is that, which bringeth this depopulation and seruitude, this hard and cruell yoake both vpon soule and body. Discord and dissention is is the puppis & prora. Men should la­bour to pluck out those things which either hinder the growth of the good seede of the Word, or which let the Word from being receiued; and so all men should liue in charity, for as Greg. in post. saith, discordes tamdiu nullum bo­ni operis sacrificium deo immolant, quamdiu a proximorum charitate discordant, Men can offer no acceptable sacrifice to God, so long as they are at variance [Page] with their brethren. S. Hieron. ad Rom. Vbi dissentio & invidia, ibi chorus non est: Where there is discord and en­uy, there is no friendly fellowship; and where there is no fellowship, there is no strength, but all are weake: where­as if they would ioyne hands toge­ther, they would be strong enough for all their aduersaries.

O poore Christians, running to your owne murder, and which is worst, de­lighting in selfe-killing, thinking all is well, if you die in your own conceited cause, with the approbation of your hooded Conscience. I aske you, what thinke you shall be your reward from God for dying in such quarrells, as the most part of you doe? The Romish Church will condemne the Greekish, as Schismatike, for her Fermamentum; The Greekish will excommunicate and abiure the Romish Church for her Azyma. And so the wiser sort can­not but either laugh with Democritus, [Page] or lament with Heraclitus, beholding this mad folly. Greece will not fast vpon Saterdayes, yet Rome will: and herein lieth the plea and action. Good Lord! what shall wee say? I must heere insert the speeches of Manuel Ca­leca, a Greeke, from whom I haue lear­ned all these foolish and futile diffe­rences for the most part, Lib. 4. contra Graecos, cap. de Ieiunio. Omnino autem de cibis & potibus, & indumentis quae (que) ipse &c. The Grecians (saith he) make the Latines Heretikes, because they vse not the customes in meat, drinke, and clo­thing, which they vsed in the begin­ning: for they would haue all the na­tions of the earth (if it were possible) to obserue the same Ceremonies, which they doe; not knowing that they themselues may bee also rebuked in the same, and such like. And yet it is not impossible, that all the world should be brought vnder one and the same rule, the differences of tongues, [Page] of manners, and such like things being no hinderance for the effecting of this; for when the Apostles had visited the whole world, they inforced none to change their ceremonious Customes in common things; but exhorting them to hold fast 10. or 12. princi­pall Articles of Religion, and to con­fesse them; they made no mention of any thing else, vnlesse it did openly gain-stand the former articles. O aureum dictum! a saying to be registred in the hearts, & printed vpon the fore-heads of turbulent and furious spirits now adayes, who cannot indure, but with gnashing of teeth, that any Church or Countrey baptize with crossing after, haue Organs or Altars, Curats, or Pre­benders, vse Cap or Surplise, because they haue them not, or rather will not haue them at all; or else because they are in vse in the Popish Church, (a fine reason indeed.) I wonder that these men can indure preaching in a Church [Page] built by a Papist, or ringing of Bells, this being a custome vsed by the Pa­pists, or giuing of thankes after meat, seeing the Papist doth the like. And as those men loathe euery Ceremonie which the Romane Church hath: so doth the Romish Church detest the Greeke Church, and shee no lesse the Romish: so that this question being propounded to Chomatianus, by a Greeke, Whether it was lawfull for a Greeke to enter into a Latin Church, and worship there being desired; he answered negatiuely, Tom. 1. Iuris Grae­corum. Balsamon saith, That all the ce­remonies of the Latin church diffe­ring from the ceremonies of the holy Catholike Church, (he meaneth the Greeke Church) are to be reiected, and no societie to be kept with the Latines, Ibidem. Cabasila propounded a question to Iohn Bishop Citrius, if the Greeks which were buried in the La­tine Churches, and had Hymnes sung [Page] at their Funeralls, could be subiect to censure. Yea, after the Councell of Florence, the rage of the Grecians was so great against those that were at the Councell, and accorded to some Ar­ticles for the purchasing of ayd against the Turke, who at that time tooke the neuer enough lamented citie of Con­stantinople, that when they came home, though subiect to the vncertaine and faithlesse mercy of the barbarous con­querour, they excommunicated all those who accorded to the Articles: and when their soules had taken their good night in parting from the body, they cast them like dogs into ditches, and denied them most barbarously the benefit of Christian buriall.

The Latine Church not being wil­ling to be inferiour to her sister in these prankes, doth serue the Protestants af­ter the like manner: for if any of the reformed Church die amongst them, his soule is determinately sent packing [Page] to Hell by the PopesFor euery Holy Thurs­day he curseth all Protestants. cursing; his bo­dy it must either lie vnburied at all, or else it must be carried to some place where Protestants vse to interre their dead. O my soule! what shalt thou think? How must thou meditate vp­on the barbarous and beastly crueltie against the dead bodies of them, who liued to the eyes of all, vnblameable, (perchance) and died in the faith of the Lord Iesus, holding him onely their Redeemer, Sauiour, and Mediatour, baptized in the Name of the Father, Sonne, and Holy Ghost, giuing testi­monies of their comfort and gladnesse in the houre of their death, shewing by their cheerfulnesse the Prognosti­cations and infallible tokens of their entrance and fore-smelling of endlesse glory. Such mens bones doe the Pa­pists debarre from resting in that Por­tion of our Grand-mother Tellus, where the former Saints bodies, which now in part triumph in de­light, [Page] rest, waiting for a glorious re­surrection, a perfect beatitude, with a full and plenary indulgence & acquit­tance from sin, and her reward, death: for death is the wages and stipend of sinne. Is not this a tyrannie going far beyond that of Nero, surpassing that of Decius, and an hundred times more execrable than that of Heliogabalus? These men can suffer him whom they haue seene with their eyes die in a ken­nell, stabbing and stabbed in a drun­ken humour; or him, who all his life time hath played the throat-cutting Ruffian, or the leacherous whore­monger, and who at last hath dyed in the Poxe, without so much as poenitendi animus; yea, him, whom they haue heard with their eares awake Stix, Le­the, and Acheron with hideous and fear­full bannings, abuse with thunder­bolts, and cannon-shot volies of a­bominable oathes the great and glori­ous Name of the euerliuing God: such [Page] men (I say) they can indure to be in­tombed & incoffined with them, and to haue their portion in their ground, and to lie among them with abun­dance of peace, whereas they would striue to ransacke Heauen and Earth; yea, Acheronta mouerent; they would euen trouble Hell it selfe, if they did know that any Protestants ashes did rest there. O Lord, how long wilt thou delay, and suffer this vnheard of cruel­tie? To returne to my purpose. The reason of all these things, is either the want of charitie, or of prudent discre­tion of things necessary from things indifferent. This age is pestered, yea, it is consumed with these fire-brands in matters indefinable. Many good Christian people haue vsed direct and indirect meanes to cure this sore, to quench these faggots with their Wri­tings full of prudence and pietie; but behold their reward, both the parties haue persecuted them with calumnies, [Page] calling them Neutralls, neither hic, nor haec, Nullifidians, Vbiquitaries: yea, the ordinary censure goeth so far, as with­out soule and conscience now to call them Atheists; Or else both the parties hate them in such a measure, that they thrust them from their Communi­ons. This maketh the Speakers in this businesse to bee few, but Writers almost none.

I remember that conferring with a learned man concerning this subiect, I asked him why he did not write his iudgement in these controuersies. His answer was, Cui vsui reip. Christianae, et cui bono mihi? telling me, that it could not helpe the generall cause one whit, but doe much hurt to the doer. I know many such on both sides, who lament the Schisme, and yet cannot helpe it. Oh that the Roman Church, some­times the beautifullest amongst wo­men, that fairest and most glistering Church amongst all her Sisters milli­tant [Page] vpon Earth, would acknowledge her selfe to be a Sister and not a Mi­stris. There was a time when she gaue her helping hand, (as at the famous Councells of Nice, Ephesus, Constanti­nople, and Chalcedon) and did not rule with a dictatory power. There was a time, when in an harmonicall con­cord she was moued with the rest of her planeticall and wandring Sisters in this vaile of sorrow and triall, by the reuolution of her first mouer, and did shine amongst them all like Phoebus in his Spheare; imparting out of her de­uotion and charytie that portion of light, which her Redeemer had made her Hand-maide of euen then, when Arrianisme had ouer-runne all the O­rient and Affrick, when Ierome cried out of it, Ingemuit mundus se Arrianum esse factum; but now the fogge of her smoakie vapours obscureth the decli­ning rayes of Religion and Charity, which in the latter ages are so fast [Page] rushing to their Sun-set, yea to their lamentable and darkesome midnight. Alas, who shall furnish my eyes with floods of waters? & who shall make my head a liuing spring, that from henceforth I may water my Couch with sorrowfull teares? Let mee mourne with the Turtle, and chatter with the Crow, for the losse of my beloued: Hee is gone and left his people to their own fancies and luna­ticke toyes. Our sinnes haue banished him; let repentance recall him. Cold­nesse in faith hath lost him; let feruen­cie find him. Vnsetled hope could not keepe him; let steadfastnesse lay hold on him. Periurie, Swearing, Blasphe­mie, Idoll-worship, haue shut the doore of our soules vpon him: Let feare, reuerence, with regard of his im­periall Maiestie and illimited power open againe vnto him. Contempt of his Sabbath made him loath vs; fre­quenting his Sanctuary will force him [Page] to loue vs Mis-regard of Superiours, Parents, & Magistrates, hath made vs Tutorlesse; obedience to our Prince, loue to our Magistrates, regard to Pa­rents, will make him haue a care of vs. Lying, Slaunderous Callumnies, Backbiting our Neighbours, haue made him suffer these intestine Iarres in Religion and worship; loue to­wards our Brethren will make him reunite our affections in one.

This Treatise of differences I col­lected, partly by reading partly by the helpe of some acquaintance of mine tenne yeares agoe in the Low-Countries. Petrus van Heiffen (one of my owne profession) at my request collected all he could finde by his reading in pri­uate, and searching of Libraries; Iekan Heymer (a Papist) by his trauailes to Rome and Germany, helped me with the oddest peeces he could finde, ha­uing also trauailed in the Turkish Ter­ritories, where by conferring with [Page] some Grecians, he got most sure intel­ligence of their opinions. These scrowles I kept these tenne yeares, to see if any other had handled this Sub­iect before in the English tongue; and hauing found by diligent enquirie and scruteny, that no man heretofore hath touched this matter in this tongue, I thought good (Christian brother) to let thee smell these differences, that perceiuing the stinking streames which runne from these impure and muddy Springs, thou maist learne to haue a care of thy selfe. Aristotle taught Sophisticall captions, not that his Schollers should practise Sophistry, but that they should be able to repell it. The Persians were wont to paint a whore with one hand in the young­mans pocket, and with the other hold­ing a knife to cut his throat; not that their youths should frequent the com­pany of naughty and lewd women, but that they should seek by all meanes [Page] possible to shun them and their dam­nable tricks. O how ioyfull a thing is it to see brethren hold fast the bond of friend­ship and amity. If a man would but behold these Controuersies as a neu­trall only, thē should he plainly see the errours of both sides, where as spleene and choller doth hinder any man in­gaged on either side from searching the truth. The Turkes in their damna­nable Mahumetan worship, the Pagans in worshipping the Sunne & Moone, the Aegyptians in their Isis and Osyris, the Numidians, Lybians, in their seruing of cats, dogges, onyons and leekes, vse diuersitie of Ceremonies and Rites; yet they still retaine theBecause there is no good bond of friendship but that which is grounded vp­on God and his worship. ill-tied knot of friendship in their Idol-seruice. But Christians thunder calumnies and bolt excommunications one against another, if there be but a difference in any kinde of Ceremonies. Christian brethren, this maketh those that are without to be scandalized by vs Chri­stians, [Page] to loath our profession, to con­demne our faith, to persecute our per­sons, to ouerthrow our Kingdomes, to spoyle our Countries, to depriue vs of our liberties and priuiledges, to en­force many weake ones to imbrace I­dolatrie, to torture the constant with intolerable, yea vnexpressable tormēts, to the end they may make them re­nounce Christianitie; yea, which is worst of all, they by our diuisions, are kindled with such hatred against vs, and with such zeale to their owne profession, that they thinke they doe God good seruice, and a great benefit to poore soules, when they make them abiure their faith and baptisme. O mi­serable Christians! returne, returne vnto the Lord, for you haue falne by your iniquities, returne (I say) vnto him, and he will cure you of your in­iquities. Earnest prayer, endlesse de­uotion, volumes of mourning Madri­galls, like Dauids Penitentialls, clouds [Page] of watry sighs; Nineuies fasting, Ma­nasses repentāce, Peters weeping, with Pauls reformation, is the sole Mi­thridaticke, the soueraigne Pandoron, the true Alexipharmacon, the purest sim­ple, the rarest compound that can o­pen this vlcer, ransacke this botch, and cure this incurable, and neuer enough to be lamented dissease of the Christi­an world. O vtinam tantum facerent qui possunt, quantum volo qui nil valeo, Would to God the Potentates & Mo­narchs of the Earth (the Kings and Princes I meane of Christendome) would ioyne hand in hand to build the walls of Ierusalem, to raise vp the Towers of Sion. O where is there a Zorobabel to re-edefie the walles of the old Temple? the Temple had a Salo­mon to build her, a Zorobabel to re­build her, though not so sumptuous as she was at first, yet in great pompe and glory.

I sue for no new Salomon: there [Page] must be but one, euen he who foun­ded his Church with his blood, the Lambe of God, Mactatus à iactus mun­di fundamentis, the Prince of peace, the Authour of loue; yet we may haue, yea, we haue presently many Zoroba­bels, many Masters of worke in the Christian world: some Greekish, some Latine, and some Reformed; some Russian, some Armenian, some Egyp­tian, some Abissine; euery one accor­ding to the measure of his iudgement and Learning, would helpe to repaire those Breaches. And that this may be effected, you sacred Monarchs vse your authoritie, you nursing Fathers, cha­stise with the rod where there is need of the same: Cut away with the Sword of Iustice, (which you carry not in vaine) the trunkes of Pride, Vaine-glory, and Selfe-loue, which ouer-whelme the Clergie for the most part: Learned Schoole men, leaue the brainsicke and foolish inventions of [Page] Aristotle, Philoponus, Themistius Aver­roes, leaue (I say) to mingle them with the pure and liuing Christall Springs of the Word. Writers of Controuer­sies hunt not after Victory ambitious­ly, vbi lis est de lana caprina, for the most part: But search Truth, sincero, & animo candido, knowing that your account shall be great before God, if you leade the poore ignorant to fall in the ditch. And this I say not so much for any danger that is in any moderne opinion, but in respect of the great and dangerous scandall, whereby wee offend the weake and tender Consci­ences of the poore and ignorant Lai­tie, which solemnely sweareth (being so by vs informed) that euery poynt of Controuersie is either an Article of a new Creed, or else a new Article ad­ded to the Creed; and the Laitie erring in Iudgement, doe thunder all con­trary minds to hell for euer. And so the sinne of the people is not so much [Page] an errour of beleefe, (though muzled vp like blind bayards in ignorance, and implicite faith) as it is the defect of charitie towards their brethren, which is the greatest sinne a man can commit against his Neighbour: yea, it maketh a man hard in his Iudge­ment, and without repentance, and therefore damnable.

I remember, that once conferring with a Cousin of mine, a prudent and learned Gentleman, compleat in all endowments of body and mind, (his want of charitie onely being excep­ted) he said, Woe is mee, that you should be in Hell, when I am in Hea­uen, seeing you are an Heretike, (Pro­testant he meant) I answered, Well Sir, you are too rash in iudging. I am as sure (said hee) of your damnation, if you die a Protestant, as that Christ is in heauen at the right hand of the Father. I answered, You that are Papists are very sure of our damna­tion, [Page] I wonder greatly, that your are neuer sure of your owne saluation: But thus much I tell you, I will not sit vpon Gods Tribunall, to giue out the Sentence of condemnation against you; yet since you lacke charitie to­wards me your Christian Brother, and giue out the sentence of condemna­tion against me so peremptorily, ta­king Gods part vpon you: I thinke you will be damned, except you re­pent you of your speech. And take not my Iudgement for rash, since I iudge the Tree by the Fruit, and you by your Charitie, which is the prin­cipall and cardinall Vertue of the law. Deuout Preachers, fill your Sermons from the Store-house of Scripture: informe in faith from Saint Paul to the Romanes, and from the first and second of Iames: reforme manners from Ieremie, Ezechiell, Hosea, and Ioel: denounce iudgements from Zacharia, Amos, Ionas, Michaiah: teach your [Page] selues from Titus, and Timothie. This is all your taske, and to liue well, and goe before the people like the fierie Pillar in the night, and the Cloud in the day, to guide them, and to pre­serue them from Schisme and Heresie. Doe not spend your time in inventing Rhethoricke to admiration, critticke Methods for emulation, vnprofitable Questions breeding Controuersies: Feed not the itching eares of the hu­merous people with Nouelties, need­lesse questions, and vnhandsomely borrowed Similies. In touching and taxing your Aduersaries in Pulpits, (which would to God you did more seldome) doe not so much endeauour to make them odious to your people, as to make your hearers commiserate their estate, for whom Christ died; and to mooue your Auditorie to pray for their conversion, and not for their confusion. Our prayer to God should be to suspend his Iudgements, [Page] and to helpe vs with grace, as he plea­seth to giue it for measure, and when hee pleaseth to giue it for time. Prayer should bee Optatiue, desiring and wishing with feare and humilitie, no wayes Imperatiue, enioyning sub­stance and circumstance to God, that he would inflict such punishment, at such time, and in such place, vpon such and such persons. Popish curses and Excōmunications, (the Sword which vntie the Gordian knot of the Church, the Hammer which broake the wall in the mids, the noyse which must not be heard at the rebuilding of the Temple.) I abhorre with my soule, since the peremptory and rash Excommunications, the drawing of the Sword of God vpon euery idle oc­casion scandalously, and many times in derision of God and his Church, the cutting off men from the Communi­on for little causes, for no causes; yea for vertuous actions, and reproouing [Page] of sinnes offensiue to God, and oppro­brious to man, haue occasioned, bred, brought to light, nourished, and yet still foster the rent of the Church. Lord giue vs affections to loue peace, hearts to bewaile the Schisme, and then will we hope for Vnion. Which (O Lord) in thy due time performe to thy glory, the honour of thy Sonne, and the comfort of those who shall perseuere in thy grace to the end. Amen.

Thine in the Lord, I. R.

THE DIFFERENCES BETWEENE THE Easterne and Westerne CHVRCHES.

THe causes of this lamē ­table Schisme, which diuided the affections of Christians, and brought vpon them the yoake of Turkish seruitude, as I can gather them from Petrus Stewartius Leodius, (a man by discent of the Scottish blood, for Religion a Romish Catholicke, remarkable for his dignity, Vice-Chauncelour, and professor of Diuini­tie in Ingolstade famous for the Iesuites [Page 2] renowned Schoole there) neither adding, nor diminishing from his words (as they are set downe in his notes vpon Caleca, who being a Greeke, wrote against the O­rientall Churches in defence of the Ceremo­nies of the Occidentall Churches) you shall haue faithfully translated, as here fol­loweth.

Petrus Stewartius in Calecam Pag. 407. editione Ingolstadi­ensi 1608. Ex varijs Graeco­rum monumentis.

WE think that the causes, or rather the excuses of the Schisme, are foure.

1. First, the deuision of the Empire: for albeit the Emperours who did raigne at Con­stantinople, after Constantines departure from the Citie of Rome (He touch­eth the forged donation of Constantine which I would wish no man to beleeue, since it is re­futed inuin­cibly by the learned of this Age. Reynolds with Hart. History of Magdenburge, and the Booke intituled Constantines defence. because they had by a donation bestowed it all, (as wee spake be­fore) vpon the Church) had not right it Ita­ly, yet not withstanding sometimes they ru­led [Page 3] This indeed is not probable that they had no right at all in Rome, and yet should rule euery where. Iudge indiffe­rent Reader. euery where. But when a barbarous Nation had rushedInfra pro in videtur poni. into Italy, euen to Rome, and theLoe. 3. Pope had required the aide of Leo Emperour then at Constantinople, who negli­gently refused aide to the Church, the Pope was forced to recallAnno Dom. 800. Charles-maine from the French Territories, and make him Empe­rour in Italy, and defender of the Church: For this Pope Leo was a man much giuen to voluptuousnesse, (as we read) and therefore too too remisse in his gouernement of the Empire, whence it came to passe, that in his time the Sarazens tooke Syria, & the Turks, Capadocia; and so the Roman Empire was diuided.

2. The second cause of the deuision was, because they were not called to the Coun­sellVltra mon­tanum seu Lugdunense lib. Greg. x. beyond the hills, when the word (filio­que, and from the sonne) was added.

3. The third occasion was (which they themselues sometimes in familiar conference did shew vnto vs) the too great and extraor­dinary exaction of the Popes Legats; for when they brought yearely the Chrisme from the Apostolicke Sea to Constantinople, they would not depart from thence, vnlesse they had eighty pound weight of gold, be­sides other gifts bestowed vpon them. I will be silent of the pompe and pride (whereof they spake) which the Legats shew there.

4. The fourth and chiefest cause vpon the [Page 4] Clergies part was the deposition of their Patriarch Photius, Et in the Latine multi­plied soundeth harshly. the excommunicating of him with other Prelats and some Abbots.

Paulo infra.

These things were written in Constanti­nople, by the preaching Friers for the edify­ing of the people and for the profiting of soules, in the yeare of our Lord 1252. to the praise and glory of the Father, Sonne, and Holy Ghost. Amen.

The Articles controuerted.

1 The procession of the Holy-Ghost not only from the Father, but from the Sonne also, of which Caleca writeth copiously in his first three Bookes.

2 The second Controuersie is the addition of the word (filióque and from the Sonne) to the Creede.

3 The third is vnleauened bread, vsed in the Eucharist for leauened; for the Easterne Churches say that Christ vsed leauened Bread.

4 The fourth is the blessed estate of the Saints, and damnation of the wicked; for the Grecians hold, that though soules are fully clensed and purged from sinne in this life, yet they inioy not their blessednesse in an instant after they part from the body, but [Page 5] that they are suspended vntill the day of ge­nerall resurrection: So they hold that the soules of Reprobates which die in their sins without repentance, are not tormented in the highest measure before the day of Doome.

5 The fift is Purgatory, concerning which point the Grecians wrote a Booke, which now is translated into Latin, and set out by a Protestant writer Vulcanius, in which they refute Purgatory, and answer to the Testimo­nies of Scripture and Fathers obiected a­gainst them for the defence of it.

6 The sixt is, because in the Latine Church a Priest will execute the Office of a Deacon, for the Grecians hold it vnlawfull, that any man except he be a Deacon read their Litur­gie, or common seruice, (which the Latins call Masse) whereas the Latin Church will suffer a Priest to doe the Office of a Deacon, seeing that a Church man is ordained Dea­con before he be Priest; and the taking vpon him the Order of Priest-hood, which is a su­periour degree, excludeth not the inferiour degree of Deaconship, which he had before. Now the Office of a Deacon is to giue the Cup to the Priest.

7 The seuenth is Images, which the Greeke Church doth not worship as the Latine doth: for in the dayes of Leo Isaurus, called by others, Iconomachus (because he destroy­ed [Page 2] [...] [Page 3] [...] [Page 4] [...] [Page 5] [...] [Page 6] Images) the Councell holden at Ephesus did condemne Image-worship; and there­after followed the breaking of them in pieces after a rude and scandalous manner indeed, for which Gregorius 2. did excom­municate Leo and all his adherents, anno 716. and did free the Subiects of Leo from their oath of Obedience; which asIn Epitoma Historiarum. Turselme the Iesuite relateth, made the Romanes, with those of Pentapolis, Rauenna, and Campania, to reiect Leo their Emperour, and to rebell a­gainst him. The Pope in a Councell at Rome decreed, That Images should bee kept to helpe the rude multitude, and to be worship­ped by them, who could not reade Scrip­ture. And so the Pope and the Emperour running vpon two extremities; the one too extreame in defacing and demolishing the Images barbarously; the other in erecting and honouring them too much. The Coun­cell assembled at Franckford, which did con­sist of Germane, English, French, and Italian Bishops, condemned the breaking and de­facing of Images, and reiected the worship of them, by reason of the Canon of the Councell of Eliberis, Ne quod colitur in pa­rietibus pingatur, Let not that be worship­ped which is painted on walls. And heere I must adde the words of Carolus, lib. 4. contra Graecorum Synodum, Cap. 9. Imagines nil si non habentur derogant, nil si habentur praerogant, [Page 7] cum tamen abdicatae quandam incautam leuita­tem afferant, adoratae vero culpam inurant: Images derogate nothing from Christianitie if they bee not at all; they helpe it nothing if they bee; but to reiect them rashly, it ar­gueth a certaine foolish lightnesse; and the worshipping of them doth make men faultie. But that famous Writer, G. Cassander lib. Consult. cap. de Imaginibus, sheweth, that in the dayes next the Apostolicke times, for many ages, there was no vse of Images in the Basilickes and Churches. But to speake of the opinion of the Grecians now adayes concerning Images, the Controuersie be­tweene them and the Romish Church stan­deth in two poynts.

1 The Grecians will admit no Image of Christ and the Saints, if it bee molten, or grauen, thinking it directly forbidden in the second Commandement: but if it be painted, then they like of it.

This distinction the Latines hold to bee foolish, saying, That the Grecians may as well gather out of that Cōmandement, that there should be no Pictures of Christ or the Saints, Seeing that the Commaundement sayeth, Thou shall not make to thy selfe a­ny grauen Image, nor the similitude of any thing that is in heauen aboue, nor in the earth beneath, nor in the waters vnder the earth. Possevinus in sua Muscouia, writeth [Page 8] thus, and sheweth that the Rutheni worship the Images of Christ and Saints, when they are painted.

2 The Grecians will worship no Image; yea, they will admit no Image (so many, to wit, of the Grecians as allow of Image-worship, which are the Rutheni) but that which hath the Name of Christ and the Saints desig­ning the Image, the Type, viz. carrying the name of the Prototype. And if the name of Christ be written in Greeke letters, they like the Picture; if in Latine, they reiect it. Of those Poss [...]vinus, Ibidem. Quod Rutheni tui mirantur, &c. Whereas the Russians won­der that wee adde not the names to the Ima­ges, as they doe. Vnderstand thou, that if the addition of the names be onely necessary that the Saints may bee knowen, then the names are not needfull to those that know the Images without names, &c. And if they will say that in the very name there is some vertue, thou shalt doe well not to conceiue any vertue to bee in these notes; but that in a liuely faith onely standeth all the vigour and strength of this businesse, &c.

8 The eighth difference is this, The La­tines in making the signe of the Crosse vpon themselues, begin at the right hand: but the Grecians are contrary to them, for they begin at the left hand; but when the Greci­ans make the signe of the Crosse vpon any [Page 9] other, then they begin at the right hand, as Caleca writeth, Lib. 4. de Crucis signo, where­in he plainely wondreth, and sheweth the wondring of some of the Latines at the ru­sticall humour of the Grecians, who would haue rent the Vnitie of the Church for such an indifferent poynt of Ceremonie, as for making the Signe, either this way, or that way.

It may be demaunded,Obiect. 1. Why the reformed Churches reiect the vse of the Crosse, and refuse to carry it about their neckes, and to make the signe of it daily vpon their bodies, seeing that both the Latine Church, and a great part of the Greekish Church vse the same frequently, especially the Russians, which in this Ceremonie are become (par­don the word) supersubstantiall, and foolish in vsing of it.

I answere,Answ. That as the Crosse was one of the Instruments of mans saluation, in the eye of the world it was disgracefull and odious; so that Iewes, Pagans, and Infidels did ob­iect it to Christians as a matter of infamy, and made the signe thereof in derision of Christianitie; Christians therefore to shew that they were not ashamed of Christs death, or of the manner of it, they vsed the signe of it in their actions and doings, both in their religious Seruice, and in any ciuill businesse. In the Warres they carried the Crosse vpon [Page 10] their breasts, or about their necks; the Stan­dard of Christians oftentimes was made in forme of a Crosse, and now seeing that the Grecians are daily conuersant with Mahu­metans, Infidells and others, who neuer ac­knowledged Christ as the Messias; but mocke Christians for beleeuing in one who was hanged vpon a Crosse: the moderate vse of the signe with the carrying of it about their necks or after any other manner cannot be rebuked. As for the Protestant and re­formed Churches, there is no such necessity of wearing it and vsing it on all occasions, seing they dwell amongst Christians, who take no exceptions at the manner of Christs death: as for those of the Roman Church, they haue thought it (being of it selfe a meere indifferent thing) so necessary in all their religious duties, that they haue too too much abused it, holding almost no­thing sanctified but that which is clogged and ouer-burdened (that I may say so) with crossing. Therefore Protestants to shun the inconuenience vpon the popish side, and not hauing occasion of the other motiues vpon the Greatians side, they presse not the people with this Ceremonie: though after baptis­me, as an auncient custome deriued from the Primitiue Ages in the Church of England, they vse the Signe of the Crosse; and that af­ter Baptisme, (I say) the Roman Church ha­uing [Page 11] it before it, to shew that they put no vertue in the signe to banish Deuills out of the body or soule of the Child, as Popish Priests doe; but only vse it as a decent and religious custome, when the Child is sancti­fied and cleansed by the water of Bap­tisme.

9 The ninth Article, is fasting vpon Satur­day, called ieiunium sabbati, of which Cardi­nall Baronius, Anno Christi 57. numero. 202. disputeth after this manner: The summe of whose speeches being conferred with other writers of that kind, is this.

Baronius. Vetus est illa quaestio, &c. That is an auncient question (of which Hierom. to Lucinius) concerning which, Thippolitus Martyre, and many famous Writers set out their Commentaries: to wit, wherefore Sa­turday should be added to the Fasts in the Westerne Churches: on which if a man fast in the Orientall Churches hee is accounted execrable, and it hath beene so in the Orient from the very beginning of Christianity, as Ignatius writing to the Philippians sheweth, Si quis dominicum diem &c. If any man fast on Sunday or on the Sabbath (Saturday be­fore Easter, for Christs lying in the graue that day. one being ex­cepted) he is a murderer of Christ. Againe, there is an Apostolicke Canon concerning the same, Can. 65. and repeated in the 6. Sy­nod Which Baro­nius holdeth to be a bastard Canon. Can. 55. The reason wherefore Igna­tius did hold it to be such an execrable crime [Page 12] was this: two sortes of Hereticks were mo­tiues and causes of it; the first were those who denied Christs resurrection, and so when Christians reioyced on the Lords day, those Heretickes passed it ouer in mourning and fasting.

The second were those, which affirmed that the God of the Hebrewes who made the World and the Law, was euill, and that Christ came to destroy the Law. And be­cause that the God of the Hebrewes rested the seauenth day, and the Hebrewes did honour God, and keepe that day because of his or­dinance, as a feastiuall and not a fasting day: therefore these Heretickes, in disgrace of the Hebrewes God, and their Sabbath, did fast and not feast on it. Simon Magus was Au­thour of this heresie: Menander, Saturninus, Basilides, Cerinthus & Carpocrates, were de­fenders of it, of which Irenaeus, Epipha­nius, &c.

All these liued with Ignatius, hee wrot a­gainst them and hated the Ceremony for the Hereticks vse of it: Cerdon and Marcion followed this point. And though these He­retickes had many differing errours, yet they all agreed in this, that they made God the Creator, authour of euill, and contumelious­ly fasted on that day; as it were, to oppose themselues to his constitution. This was the reason that not only they abstained in the O­rient [Page 13] from fasting on Saturdayes, because Hereticks did fast on those daies; but also they vsed to spend the day in great cheereful­nesse: and they assemble themselues vnto their holy exercises, as frequent on the Sa­turday, as on the Lords day. Many of the auncients beare witnesse to this, especially Clement, who in the Apostolicke constituti­ons saith,Which booke of his is iudg­ed by the lear­ned to be sup­positions. Sabatum & dominicum diem festum agimus, &c. We make both the Saturday and the Sunday holy-daies: because the first is a monument of Natures accomplishment; the second of Christs resurrection. Wee keepe our Sabbath in the yeare on which we fast and not feast, for our Lords buriall, &c. Thus Clement, with whom agree Socrates, Gregorius, N [...]issenus, Anastasius, Nicaenus; And this the Orient did out of religious hearts and full of piety, in opposition to He­resie, and not in a Iudaizing humour.

The reason wherfore the Westerne Chur­ches fast on Saturday, is first,If that story of that disputati­on be not fa­bulous. as S. Augustin to Casulanus writeth, because that Peter be­ing vpon the Lords day to dispute with Si­mon Magus, on the Saturday before he fasted with the whole Church; and therefore for the prosperous successe which Peter had in that businesse, the Occidentall Churches e­uer since honoured that day with fasting.

The second reason, which is more pro­bable, is the reason of Pope Innocentius wri­ting [Page 14] to Decentius Eugubinus Bishop, which is, that because Saturday was a time wherein the Disciples, and the blessed Virgin, fasted and mourned for our blessed Sauiour whilst he was in the graue: therefore as the fourth day being Wednesday, and the sixt being Friday, were consecrated to fasting by the Westerne Churches: so likewise in remem­brance of our Sauiours abode in the graue, they appointed Saturday to bee a fasting day.

Therefore Barnious desireth, that no man should take exception against the custome of the Latin Church, in which the former here­sies did not arise, for which she needed not to forbare her fasting dayes, not being troubled with any such Hereticks; and which did not condemne but rather iustified the Greekish Church for keeping no company with Here­ticks in this point.

The tenth Controuersie, is because the Latins are not so strict in their fasting, when they doe fast, neither fast they so frequently as the Grecians doe. The heads of this tenth Controuersie are reduced to eight branches, as they are rehearsed and gathered by sundry men out of the Bauarian bibliothecke in the Index, which is called Index errorum Roma­nae Ecclesiae olim Constantinopoli gracè scripta nunc Latinè per &c.

[Page 15]The first branch of Heresie laid to the charge of the Latin Church, is because the Latins doe not obserue the chiefe eating weeke (called Hebdomas [...]) but in that weeke eate flesh, as also on two daies of the first weeke of Lent. They begin their fasting vpō the fourth day of the weeke, (called Wednesday by vs) giuing a reason, forsooth, because from this day of the first weeke, to the weeke of Palmes the fortie daies are ac­complished; so strict are these fasters in keeping exactly the number of fortie.

The second branch is, because the Latins once a day quickly eating, at night they eate fish their bellies full, and some bcome drunke; and they make no con­science to drinke all the day long; and yet with this one refreshment of theirs, they will haue their fast vnblamable and vnreprehensibly kept.

The third is, because on euery Saturday and Lords day of the Lent, they giue their children cheese and egges to eate, & they themselues eate the same with­out any scruple at all vpon the fish day of the great Feastiuitie, that is, vpon holy Thursday.

The fourth is, because all the yeare long vpon any fourth or sixt day, they eate either fish or flesh; all eate flesh vpon [Page 16] the fourth day, some also vpon the sixt.

The fift, as they fast euery sixt day eating at night, so though the day of the Na­tiuity or Circumsition, or any of the great Feasts fall vpon Saturday, they will not lose the Fast for it.

The sixt, they eate with dogges and tame beares, to which they throw the plat­ters and dishes that they may lick them, out of which, they themselues after­wards eate meat.

The seuenth, their Monkes eate fat of Hogges growing fast to the flesh, which is called Lard, & vpon any suspicion of sicknes (though it be neuer so little) both Monks and Laicks eate flesh in the Lent. But if it fall out that any Monke be ordained a Bishop, then safely with­out any controulement hee eateth flesh.

The eight, the Latins are not vniforme in their fasting in the Lent time, [...], fast 9. weekes: the Italians 6. others 8. others fewer.

11 The eleuenth Article is the PopesSentina ma­lorum est. supre­macie; the Romish Church challengeth Su­premacie to the Pope from Peter by all Ec­clesiasticall Canons, as she alleadgeth. The Grecians strongly deny all the allegations of [Page 17] the Latin Churches, and leaning to the fourth generall Synod at Chalcedon; at last they attribute the Superiority to Sea of Con­stantinople, & that by two Canons, in which it is said, if controuersies cannot bee ended by Bishops in Prouinciall, or Nationall Sy­nods, thenIbi termi­nentur. Can. 9. let them bee determined by the Bishop of the Princely Citie Constantinople. This is repeated againe in the same Synod in another Canon, and therefore I will here set downe the words of Hugo Aetherianus, who deliuereth the Grecians mind after this man­ner. Romanus Pontifex, & omnes partium occi­dentalium Christiani sacerdotes & Laici praeter Calabros, ante multa tempora extra Catholi­cam Ecclesiam peruagantur, Euangelicarum & Apostolicarum traditionum ignari & a fide ali­eni. The Roman Bishop, and all the Christi­an Priests of the Westerne parts and Laicks, except the Calabrians, this long time haue gone astray from the Catholicke Church, being ignorant of the Euangelicall and Apo­stolicke troditions, and Aliens from the faith. And a little after, Etinim sua concimantes & alienis adhaerentes, neque diuinis Scripturis re­darguentibus ipsorum errores, neque illis qui ip­sos miserunt volunt morem gerere, for making vp their owne conceits, and adhering to strange opinions, they will neither obey the Scripture rebuking their errour, nor yet those men who ordained them.

[Page 18]The Princes of their Priests goe to warre with Laicks in Armes, and they fight in the Battell marching before others.

Ex iudice de missae sacrificio in Bibliotheca Bauarica, wee finde these notes gathered by Petrus Stewartius as errours of Grecians, and yet imputing them to the Latins: but how iustly, let the Reader iudge, seeing my in­tent goeth no farther then to translate the words without any glosse or censure of mine.

Titulo 5.This is more than truly al­leadged against the Church of Rome which forbiddeth reading of Scripture. Sacros canones & Sacras Literas &c. Scarce read they the sacred rules and holy Scriptures; they say, that the Popes Commandements, who for the time sitteth in the Sea of Rome, are their Canons and Lawes. They hold that the precepts of those who are dead, whether Apostles or Fathers, are dead with them.

Tittulo 7. They make not much account of periury; yea, the Pope freeth them of all periurie, whensoeuer they intend to breake any bargaine or couenant made with any man.

Titulo 30. The Pope and his Priestly traine remit slaughter, periurie, and all kinde of crimes past, or to come, by which remis­sion there is a gate opened to all sort of villa­ny. And that which is most foolish and ri­diculous, for the future time, they will re­mit to a prefined & determinated time of two [Page 21] three, more or fewer months or yeares. They sport after the same manner with by-past of fences, forgiuing the sinnes of dayes, months, or yeares: And yet they cannot tell by what authority, and vpon what grounds, or by what Ecclesiasticall Canon they doe this.

Titulo 45. The Latin Bishops are acces­sarie to the death of Christian people, the Pope especially, who pronounceth the kil­lers of Christians, such as resist the Papacie, blessed and happy.

12 The twelueth Article is the Eucharist and Liturgie, which the Latins call Masse, which I reduce to those heads.

  • 1. They vse vnleauened bread for leaue­ned, belying Peter and his Successours, as if they had this by tradition from them.
  • 2. They take not bread of any quantitie, they breake not the bread, they distri­bute it not, as the Lord deliuered it in his mysticall Supper; only the Priest swalloweth vp a morsell of vnleauened bread, of the bignesse of a farthing.
  • 3. Only he that sacrificeth is partaker of the sacrifice; as for the rest, whether they be of the Clergie or of the Laity, they are made partakers of it by a kisse. Neither hath that saying any place with them,
    Calumnie.
    who eateth my flesh and [Page 20] drinketh my blood hath life eternall: seeing they are not pertakers of the bo­dy and blood of Christ: they commu­nicate neuer but in the
    Preparation to the Passe­ouer.
    parascene, and the houre of death▪ and then they re­ceiue no
    Vnleauened bread,
    Azymes consecrated, but only a bitte of another bread, common, and not blessed: and they render a rea­son of it so, because they know not who is worteh of it; which excuse doth be­wray another fault worthy of blame, to wit, that they vse no Confessors: for if they had vse of those, they would not be ignorant of this point.
  • 4. Whosoeuer are partakers of the sancti­fication, that is of the Eucharist wash­ing their mouthes,
    Calumnie.
    they put out the wa­ter out of their mouthes vpon the earth and trample it vnder their feete. If ther­fore these misteries bee Christs, why are they so dishonoured? and if they be dishonoured, how are they Christs?
  • 5. They celebrate Masse in the morning, a time not appointed by the Catho­licke Church.
  • 6. One and the same Priest celebrateth Masse twise or thrise a day; either on the same Altar or on another; and a­gaine many Priests successiuely vpon the same Altar.
  • [Page 21]7. They contemne the Liturgie made by Saint Chrysostome.
  • 8. In the Lent they say Masse euery day.

13 The thirteenth Article, is Confirmation, (as the words of the Index beare) reiected by the Greciās: The words are these: When the Baptized is come to age, and is now sub­iect to actuall sinne, they annoynt him with Oyle for remission of sins; and so they seeme to baptize twice.

14 The fourteenth Article is in Baptisme: they Baptize with once dipping, pronoun­cing these words, In the Name of the Fa­ther, Sonne, and Holy Ghost. They baptize onely with water, and they annoynt him that is to bee baptized, with Spittle, powred out vpon the palme of the left hand, and a­gaine taking it in the right hand, they anoynt the baptized with it; neither receiue they from the Catholike Church the appoynted oyntment.

15 The fifteenth Article is concerning Or­dination: Bishops at euery occasion conse­crate not the Cleargie, and Bishops but sel­dome in the yeare, and superstitiously keepe set dayes in the weeke at the Equinoctialls, and Solstices; that is, in the Spring, Summer, Haruest, and Winter; in March and Septem­ber, Iune and December; and that in the first weeke of March, but in the rest of the [Page 22] moneths on the fourth day they ordaine Priests and Deacons, with others of the Clergy; but vpon Saterday they ordaine Bi­shops, and others of the higher Orders.

The Successour of the dead Pope is cho­sen after this manner: The Synod chooseth him, and bringeth him to the dead, the The liuing is the whole, the dead the halfe, viz, a carkase. Calumnie. whole to the halfe; and taking the dead Popes hand, they put it vpon the necke of the liuing Pope; and this they thinke to bee the Vnction and Consecration of the Suc­cessour, who incontinent offereth sacrifice for the safetie of the dead Pope; and there­after hee stoutly and couragiously taketh the pontificall Offices vpon him, as if hee were lawfully annoynted.

16 The sixteenth Article is Marriage, they make vnlawfull marriages; for two brethren marry two sisters, and when one in the La­tin Church giueth his Daughter in marriage to any man, he againe asketh the daughter of himConsoceri. that is Father in Law to his Daughter for his Sonne, brother or kinsman.

2. They shut vp all Priests and Deacons from marriage by their Lawes, and they hold it an abomination to re­ceiue the Sacrament from a married Priest.

2. If any married man be initiated in Priest-hood or Deaconship, he must quit his wife and leaue her; and this [Page 23] by a very strict Law, they command to be kept in all the prouinces subiect vnto them: but many were amongst them, who vilipended this Law, and married a second wife after the death of the first, and so some married the third, and yet they remained still in their sacred Office.

4. There are many Churchmen amongst them, who commit whordome, and all kind of vncleanesse most securely without punishment, taking their whores in the night time to their chambers, and letting them againe depart being vailed; neither doe they account this to be an act of vnclea­nesse, but only an idle dreame or ap­parition.

Thus farre they accuse the Latines doctrine and Sacraments; now follow the errours which they impute to them in their man­ners.

1. The first errour in manners and cere­monies, not so essentiall to the substance of Religion as they hold the rest, is this; Their Priests vse a certaine purging and washing, which serues, as they say, for remission of sinnes, and yet it is meerely Iudaisme.

2. Their principall Bishops entring to their Masse in a Procession, haue little naked children going before them, whom they [Page 24] sprinckle with water, affirming that this ma­keth them inuincibly strong in warrs.

3. They vse the holy Eucharist most neg­ligently,Here there is some Calum­ny. for going to the fields or countrey, they carry it without light, and giue it to the people without light; and those fellowes that follow the warres carry it in their burse, or put it vp after such a fashion.

4. In the summer solstice they gather the bones of impure beasts; as Asses, Dogges, and such like; they burne them and put the ashes of them in water, affirming that they serue for the purging and expiation of those persons whom they sprinckle with them.

In the beginning of Lent, which is the fourth day called Wednesday, with these ashes mingled with water, they sprinckle all the Priests that come, on the forehead and face, thinking thereby to giue aide and helpe to their fast. It is reported that they mingle these ashes with the bread that they eate. O how great and how strange an abho­mination is this!

5. Vpon Easter day, being the Lords day, they kill a Lambe and roast it, they bring it vnto the Altar, and then to their Table. Which Ceremonies being finished, they eate the flesh of the Lambe and burne the bones, and keepe the ashes all the yeare long, to sprinckle those whom they would haue to be blessed. They kill and are killed, they [Page 25] commit murther, how then can their Priests with those bloody hands, offer the mysticall body and blood of Christ.

6. Vpon the Lords passion day, they build the Lords Tombe within the Church, with common and base cloathes ordained for quotidian vse, and running to this Tombe they worship it no lesse, than if it were that same Tombe wherein the Lords body was laid. Afterwards euery man pulleth to him his owne cloathes againe, and vseth them for couering of his body, sanctifying a prophane thing, and prophaning that which is holy, and so pull downe that Tombe like a pro­phane Stage, which a little before was so worshipped by them; sporting with things which are not matters of ieasting: like little children building cabinets of straw, which a little after they beate downe.

7. They vse the Altar in stead of their common Table, and the linnen belonging to the same; which from the sacrifice they bring to their supper, and from their supper to the Sacrifice againe.

8. Any man that pleaseth may approach to the Altar, yea when the action is in hand, and that without regard of Sexe, Age, or Or­der; and Layicks sit with Priests and other holy Orders: yea, they plead Actions at the Altar. Sometimes the same Layicks carry Spurres vpon their heeles, and carrying rods [Page 26] in their hands, they keepe a foule noise. Yea, before the Altar they are bold euen to doe those things which they doe in the com­monest Court in all the Country. Some­times women sit in the Chaire of a Bishop, for those that among the Latins are most e­minent in piety, can no bettter discerne ho­ly things from prophane. Yea, which is worse, they suffer Dogges to enter into the Church; and when the Priest is a sacrificing and celebrating the Hoast, which they hold to be life giuing bread; they suffer the Dogs sitting at the Priests feete, to barke at all those that come in, and to fawne vpon the Priests and others that stand by. They suf­fer Beares and Hogges also to enter into the Church.

9. When the Gospel is a reading, and Masse a singing; yea, when the very sacred gifts are taking out, all men who please sit, and yet they are neuer blamed by their Leaders. When wee aske the cause of this irreuerent and vndecent gesture, they answere, that they sit, that no tumult be raised, whereby God may bee offended; as if that vnseemely and irreligious sitting were not iniurious to God, but rather tending to his honour.

10. After Table, they take not the Panagia, or blessing in honor of the most holy Mother of God, but they mocke at vs for the same, as if wee Grecians onely tooke the blessing [Page 27] when our bellies are full of meat and drinke: and so they esteeme a thing holy of it selfe, prophane. These forsooth, are the men that are bold to say, that they are most religious­ly minded towards the most holy Mother of God.

11. They nick-name the Grecians which are most pious in their actions, calling them Bogomili: they say that the Armenians are more religious then the Greekes, whom they call Brethren, and whom they loue as bre­thren; yea, they hate vs more cruelly then Iewes and Saracens: for they honour and embrace Iewes, which amongst them may carry the old Testament in their hands.

12. If any man amongst them die by the sword, hee is thought to bee blessed, and to goe straight to Paradise, though he be killed fighting out of auarice, or for murther, or for any other wicked deed.

13. Whatsoeuer death any man dieth amongst them, they euer blame [...], I thinke to bee [...]; for in the Westerne parts they vse to blame For­tune much. [...], for so after a barbarous manner they name Fortune or Destiny.

14. They shaue their beards, and all the haires of their body, holding this in a manner for expiation, which is meere Iudaisme.

15. They eate dead things and strangled, things taken from wild beasts, blood, vn­cleane things, as Hogges, Beares, Conies, Hares, Snailes, Water-dogs, Mice, Crowes, [Page 28] Rauens, Dolphins, and such like vncleane beasts.

And so much for that which the Grecians taxe in the Doctrines and Ceremonies of the Latines; now followeth that which they taxe, some things iustly, and some things vn­iustly, in their habit.

1 The Pope and his Vicars vse a Miter, and a Turkish tuffe, with long robes, and other things vsed in the old Testament, more fit­ting for women.

2 Their Priestly vesture is not of wooll, to signifie Christ slaine like a Lambe for vs, but of silke party-coloured. When they are do­ing holy Seruice, they carry their Gloues in both their hands; and vpon the right hand they write, Tanquam ex nube, and vpon the left, Agnus Dei.

3 Their Bishops vse rings alwayes, and they giue this reason: Because that they are like Bridegromes, or rather Husbands, euer mar­ried to their Churches; so grosse are their thoughts of sacred matters.

4 Their Ecclesiasticke persons and Monkes vse no other daily vesture then Layickes vse; neither shalt thou euer discerne Church­men from prophane men, since they shaue the chin, and that women-like: Gloria enim eorum inconfusione, for their glory is their shame: their ordinary clothing is of haire; the vesture for holy dayes is all silke, directly [Page 29] repugnant to the Constitutions of the Ca­tholike Church. Some Monkes alwayes vse white robes, a token (as they say) of vertue and cleanlinesse in them.

A Supplement.

1 They suffer Priests and men of other Or­ders to lye eight dayes without buriall, and that for filthy lucre and gaine.

2 They celebrate sundry of the festiuities of Christ vntimely, and confusedly, not accor­ding to the tradition of the Fathers.

3 Whomsoeuer they loose from excommu­nication, they strip them naked to the loynes, and hauing whipt them soundly, they let them goe, as then being perfectly reconciled to the Church.

4 They receiue not the workes of Saint Chrysostome, Basil, and Gregory Nazianzen, the lights of the Church.There are some calum­nies heere. They contemne the Epistles of Saint Paul, saying, that hee was not one of the twelue, and that hee did not see Christ, regarding nothing that vision which hee saw going to Damascus, when it was said, Vas electionis eris; neither regard they his stripes, trauailes, and conuersion of Gentils. Herein, as in some other, the Greeks falsely charge the Latins.

Cerularius, Archbishop Patriarch of Con­stantinople in his Epistle to Peter, Patriarch [Page 30] of Antioch, in briefe tearmes & short words gathereth all these long poynts, and conclu­deth out of his narration, that since the La­tines are such men and so giuen, it is impos­sible that they should haue any vnion with them, or hold them to bee true and Ortho­dox Christians; or suffer and endure them to bee numbred with them. And that which he holdeth to be most grieuous and intolerable, is the Supremacie challenged by the Latine Church, to teach all, and to bee taught of none, and Dictator-like to giue Lawes to binde other Churches, whereas shee doth those things which others mislike in her. This (gentle Reader) thou shalt finde in Ba­ronius his Annals, Tomo XI. anno Christi, 1054. num. 33. where Baronius striueth to excuse the true things laid to their charge, to refute the vntruths, and to cloke the errours of this Westerne Church in things rebukeable. Yea, hee bringeth in Petrus Antiochenus writing an answere to Cerularius, and doing it with greater credit to the cause, (if he wrote such an answere) and in more modest and Christi­an tearmes then any Sides-man could haue done: seeing that preiudice oftentimes lea­deth the best man that is, either in answering to be Satyricke and invectiue, or else to de­fend the absurdest and most erronious things that can be; And therefore I will set downe his Epistle, because it is profitable for these [Page 31] times in which we liue, wherein euery man would draw another to his opinion and pra­ctise in all things; in things of themselues meerly indifferēt, in things touching Verity, Schisme, or Heresie: for Nature hath made man [...], a ciuil creature and sociable, delighting in the company of those that are of his owne Species, and desiring all those that are of his owne kind to sympathize with his mind and affection. But Christian Chari­tie suffereth many things, tolerating that in the weake, which in the stronger it would whip with a scourge, before it should come to bee Schismaticall, either in action or affe­ction. The Lord ioyne the Christian Church in vnitie of faith, and Communion in Cha­ritie. Amen.

The Letter of PETRVS AN­TIOCHENVS to CERV­LARIVS.

WHat is it to vs that their Priests shaue their beards? And what al­though they carry a Ring as a Badge of their Marriage with the holy and blessed Church?This place seemeth to bee forged; for it was Christ that was crowned disgracefully with thornes, and not Peter; or else Peter is put for Christ: for fewe are so mad to ascribe so much honor to Peter: but no Grecian of Antiochia I am sure. Wee also beare a Crowne on our heads, for the honour (without doubt) of [Page 32] Peter Prince of the Apostles, vpon whom the Church was built: for what those wic­ked men inuented to the reproach of that holy One, wee doe piously to his glory and honour; the Romanes shauing their beards, wee bearing our Crowne vpon our heads:To wit, An­tiochians. Wee also are adorned with gold; our Gloues, our Handkerchiefes, and our Stoles are imbroydered with gold. Whereas they eat vncleane things, and their Monkes eate flesh and hogges grease, if thou wilt enquire diligently, thou shalt find that some of vs doe the like; for the Bethinians, Lydes, and Thracians eate the Pye, little Crowes, Turtles, and earth. Conies, the vse of which our Fathers left to vs as indiffe­rent: for there is none of Gods creatures to bee reiected, but all are to bee receiued with thankesgiuing, which wee learne of that great vessell of linnen which came downe from heauen: for as Basil saith, In hearbes and rootes, that which is hurtfull wee separate from the rest: so in flesh wee make distinction betweene profitable and [Page 33] hurtfull, for Hemlocke is an hearbe as the Rauen is flesh, &c. Whereas they eate strangled, and two Brethren marry two Sisters, I beleeue these things are done without the Popes permission, &c. In Con­stantinople, and with vs also thou shalt finde many such things done, &c. See therefore, my very venerable Lord, how wee neglecting many things which are done amisse amongst our selues, are too cu­rious to prie into other mens businesse, whi­lest wee should bee reforming our owne Errours.

I will not dispute now, whether Petrus euer wrote such a Letter; but surely this I must speake, (Cum omnium piorum bona ve­nia) the Letter smelleth of Mildnesse and Charitie: and would to God the Romane Church and Baronius would vse the aduise of this Writer, in dealing with the rest of the Churches of Europe, it would saue much Christian blood from being shed in Europe now adayes.

And as we haue seene the strictnesse of the Greekish humours, against all the Westerne Churches, and seeing the Reformed Chur­ches [Page 34] now adayes, are in many of these points culpable also by their iudgement; so now let vs heare what things the Latins doe obiect a­gaist them on the other side, and that, as they are collected by Master Hugo Aetherianus, so neere as we can.

1. The Latins obiect to them their capri­cious pride, who would draw all the world to Greekish Ceremonies. Caleca lib. 4. rebu­keth this in them.

2. They eate leauened bread in the Eu­charist.

3. Vpon Easter day, when the people is to communicate, their preparation is cold, they consecrate too much, and which is not tollerable, they burne the reliques.

4. They dippe the Bread in Wine, and giue it to the Communicants in a spone.

5. Their Deacons being promoued, take wiues for feare they lose their dignitie, which is against the tenth Canon of the Nycen Synod.

6. Their Priests are men of blood for the most part, which we our selues did see fol­lowing the Emperour through Capadocia & the Persian Regions.

7. Their Princes make the Priests stand by them at their banquets, taking their due ho­nour from them.

[Page 35]8. For little or very light causes they whippe their Clergie with ropes, as if they were Pagans.

9. Their Bishops are right in Simon Ma­gus estate, for they giue no Churches with­out money, no Orders without their hands bee full, no Christian buriall without money.

10. Their Patriarchs, Archbishops and Priests (as it was in the Primitiue Church with hereticks) are all promoued by Layicks. Also the third Canon of the Synod, which the Grecians call the seuenth great Coun­cell maketh all such promotion of none ef­fect.

11. They deny the procession of the ho­ly spirit from the Sonne. They fast but one Saturday in the whole yeare.Saturday be­fore Easter called Sanctū Sabbatum. Mans nature from the beginning is set on euill, but the Grecians gut contendeth with its ruine; they keepe no dyet in eating. They scarsely fast seuen dayes in the whole Lent; yea in the whole yeare: for in all their fasting they eate their Supper, except on fiue dayes in Lent, and that in the begining of their weeke, and on the holy Sabbath, and on the Eue of the Epiphanie. They cut away the great weeke from the Lent, so their fast is but sixe weekes; from the which sixe weekes, if thou takest the sixe Sundayes with the sixe Saturdayes, scarce is their fast but thirty daies; for on [Page 36] Sundayes and Saturdayes they fast not.

12. Their Monkes liuing without the Monastaries, like beasts are found in the streets eating fruite or any meate, drawing it out of their bosom as out of a chest or coffin. They goe to Tauernes, they haue not all common in one bursse, but euery one hath his owne, none of their Monkes shaue, which is directly against the Apostle, who saith,1 Cor. 11.14. Si comam nutriat &c. If a man vse long hayre it is a reproach vnto him: they diuide their haire on their foreheads like women.

13. Women leauing their naturall orna­ment, adorne themselues with the haires of the dead, which is directly against the words of Peter in his first Epistle 3. Chap. 3. verse. Let no women vse imbrodered haire or borrowed, &c. Women paint themselues with purpure and white fard or painting; and when the Husband displeaseth the Wife, or the Wife the Husband, they goe before the Pretor of the City; and so laying downe their Instru­ments and cutting their girdles, they choose where they list other Mates against Christs owne Canon: quod Deus coniunxit, &c. That which God hath ioyned let no man sepe­rate.

14. In their houses they haue little Cab­bines, in which they place the Images of Saints; they giue them all worship with Lamps, Waxe, Incense, and they suffer the [Page 37] Synod at Churches no become a wildernes; they celebrate Masse in their bed-Cham­bers for the most part.

15. The Priest sayes Masse at three of the Clocke, hauing almost no Auditours except his wife or his Child; and so when hee sayes pax vobis, hee sayes it commonly to the bare walls.

16. The Priests wiues come to the Altar, and doe the office of a Deacon; they take the bread from the Altar, or any other thing, euen to their ordinary vse.

17. On all Sundayes and Sabbaths of Lent they say Masse, and make the Lords body; but on the rest of the daies they regard it not, except vpon an vrgent occasion; vsing only prae sanctificatis: in the Lent they alto­gether omit Deus Dominus & illuxit nobis, which they sing in the rest of the yeare.

18. The Priests haue long beards after the manner of the Iewes, which when they drink the Lords blood are drenched with it. They eate strangled blood, they feed Hogs with mans blood.

19. When they assemble themselues to bury the dead, euery friend and kinsman gi­ueth the dead a kisse after a Pagan rite; for the Pagans were wont to speake these words to the dead, Vade cum natura te vocauerit; se­quemur te.

[Page 38]20. They say, [...], Christ, cannot doe so much as [...], Lord; therefore they say often [...] but neuer [...] in their seruice.

21. The Monkes as (it seemeth) only haue power to bind and loose, which Christ gaue to Peter and his Successours; wherefore Priests for Lucre take vpon them most filthy Monastique habite and remit sinnes, only that they may gaine money.

22. They auer that the Latines haue no Sacrament, because they consecrate vnlea­uened bread; for which damnable opinion they must be Hereticks saith Aetherianus.

23. If a Latin Priest offer vpon their Al­tar (which scarse is permitted) they wash the Alter with water before they offer any thing vpon it againe. And if a Latine woman bee married to a Greeke Husband, shee is com­pelled to abiure the Latin Communion, her Baptisme, and the Lords Body which shee did eate in the Latine Church, her confes­sion, and her fast vpon Saterdayes. Likewise if a Latin man marry a woman in the Citie of Constantinople, he must renounce and abiure the Latin Church: the Greekish Priests pro­mise much, but they performe nothing: they rebaptize those that come from the Latin Church to them.

The rest of the things which are obiected to them, are euen the same which they ob­iect to the Latins. So wee see the fruite of [Page 39] their Schisme to be the malicious imputati­on of many infamous lies and damnable ca­lumnies, worthy to be buried in the gulfe of obliuion: for though some of these imputa­tions be true, yet most of them are Calum­nies on both sides, or at least, things not wor­thy of rebuke.

The names of the Authours which haue written for Grecians against the Latines.

  • 1 Photius Patriarcha Constan. obiected the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son, as an Heresie to the Latine Church, anno 876. Baron. annal. He wrote a Booke De proces­sione S. Sancti; it is in the Bauarian Biblioth. num. 115.
  • 2 Nicolaus Episcopus Methonae, wrote a Booke de processione S. Sancti Bib­lioth. Bavar. num. 116. Hee wrote also another of all the Controuer­sies of Fasting, of Lent, and of the Marriage of Priests, numero 101.
  • 3 Nicetas Pectoratus, refuted by Hum­bertus. His positions are in Bibliot. Bav. numero 120.
  • [Page 41]4 Metropolita Nicaenus, hoc est Eustra­tius.
  • 5 Michael Cerularius, of whom wee spake.
  • 6 Theophylactus Bulgariae Episcopus. His Booke is in Bibl. Bav. numero 116. vixit anno 1073.
  • 7 Maximus Planudes Bav. num. 115. Hee liued vnder Andronicus Palaeo­logus the elder.
  • 8 Nicolaus Cabasilas, qui scripsit contra Aquinatem.
  • 9 Germadius Bulgariae Episcopus, Bav. numero 118.
  • 10 Iob Monabus wrote an Apologie a­gainst the Popes Supremacy, exstat in Bav. He liued vnder Michael and Theodora, Emperours.
  • 11 Nilus Archiepiscopus Thessalon. wrot 49 Bookes against the Latines; chiefly hee wrote against the Pro­cession of the holy Ghost, and the Popes Supremacie. His booke is in Bibl. Bav. num. 124.
  • [Page 42]12 Marcus Metropolita Ephesi, was in the Florentine Councell a deadly enemy to the Latin Church; retur­ning to the Orient, hee broke all concord, and wrote many bookes against the Latins, Bav. num. 102. & 115.
  • 13 Metropolitani Achrideni prima & se­cunda congressio, num. 116.
  • 14 Palamas contra Beccum.
  • 15 Michael Patriarcha. Possevinus in fine apparatus.
  • 16 Germanus Patriarcha Constantinop. Possev. appar.
  • 17 Metrophanes Episcopus Smyrnensis. Heidelb. 216.
  • 18 Hieremias Patriarcha Const.
  • 19 Maximus Margunius Episcopus Cy­therorum.

The names of Authors which haue written against the Grecians for the Latins, whereof some were Grecians.

  • 1 Emanuel Caleca, Bib. Bav.
  • 2 Demetrius Cydonius contra Cabasilam. Poss. appar.
  • 3 Beccus pat. Const. Bav. num. 115.
  • 4 Bessarion Cardinalis plurima scripsit.
  • 5 Gennadius Pat. Const. for defence of the Councell of Florence.
  • 6 Gregorius Pat. Const. Bib. Bav. num. 115.
  • 7 Georgius Trapezuntius ad Monachos, ibidem.
  • 8 Iulianus Cardinalis Possev.
  • 9 F. Iohannes ord. praedicat. & F. Fran­ciscus.
  • 10 Nichephorus Blemmida Grecian. Cal. lib. 4. cap. 10.
  • 11 Andreas Scocares. Possev. citeth him.
  • 12 Andreas Episcopus Megerensis, Possev. Catal. Sirleti.
  • [Page 44] 13 Fautinus Vallarensis Cretensis Ar­chiep. wrote against the hinderers of the Vnion with the Latines, Catal. Sirleti.
  • 14 Leo X. Papa.
  • 15 Humbertus Cardinalis Tomo XI. Ba­ron. against Archidrenus Bulgariae Episc. & Nicetas Pectoratus.
  • 16 Thomas contra Graecorum errores.
  • 17 Barlaam de Seminaria wrote Epi­stles against the Grecians, Tom. 5. antiq, Lect. D. Henrici Canisij.
  • 18 S. Anselmus wrote De processione S. Sancti cont. Grecos.
  • 19 Hugo Aetherianus wrote 3. Bookes de proc. S. Sancti cont. Grecos, Tom. 9. Biliot. SS.PP.
  • 20 Antonius Messana cont. errores Graec.
  • 21 Latinus quidem demorans in suburbiis Parisiorum ad Palaeologum Imperato­rem peregrinum in Gallia, Catal. Vati­can. Possevini.
  • 22 Disputatio qua duo Theologi disserunt de processione S. Sancti, viz. Manuel [Page 45] Chrysolora cum Georgio Palama Me­trop. Thessalonic. Possevinus holdeth this to be a Dialogue onely.
  • 23 Lastly, all the Councells which confirme the Procession of the holy Spirit, especially Florence, pub­lished both in Greeke and La­tine, in which the Procession of the holy Spirit is most euidently shewen.
FINIS.
HEere faults escap'd I haue amended,
Therefore Reader be not offended;
But if thou wilt: then whose to blame
Thy fostred faults if others name?

In the Preface. For rigorous, read vigorous. In C. read magis diligentiam. for Crow, r. Crane. for Iekan, r. Iehan. for crit­ticke, r. crypticke, for vntie, r. vntied. Page 3. in marg. for Loe, r. Leo. for lib. r. sub. p. 8. line 11. for the, r. thy. p. 13. l. 14. for our, r. one. p. 14. l. 12. for Barnious, r. Baronius, pa 15. l. 3. for chiefe, r. cheefe. l. 26. for fish, r. fist. pag. 17. l. 3. r. to the Sea. lin 24. for concimantes, r. concinnantes pag. 18. li. 4. for iudice, r. i [...]dice. p. 20. l. 10. for worteh, r. wotthy. p. 36. l. 5. for coffin, r. coffer. pa. 37. l. 1. for Synod at, r. Synodall. for no, r. to.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.