Quæstiones, Deo propitio, discutiendae publice in comitiis coram serenissimo Rege, mense August. An. 1605 Quæstiones in theologiâ. ... Quæstiones in medicinâ. University of Oxford. 1605 Approx. 3 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 1 1-bit group-IV TIFF page image. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A08727 STC 19016 ESTC S112855 99848098 99848098 13176

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A08727) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 13176) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1637:05) Quæstiones, Deo propitio, discutiendae publice in comitiis coram serenissimo Rege, mense August. An. 1605 Quæstiones in theologiâ. ... Quæstiones in medicinâ. University of Oxford. 1 sheet ([2] p.) [By J. Barnes], Oxon. : 1605. Reproduction of the original in the Bodleian Library. Printer's name from STC.

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.

lat 2007-08 Assigned for keying and markup 2007-08 Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2007-09 Sampled and proofread 2007-09 Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-02 Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
QVAESTIONES, DEO PROPITIO, DISCVTIENDAE PVBLICE IN COMITIIS coram Sereniſsimo Rege, menſe Auguſt. An. 1605.
Quaeſtiones in Theologiâ. An Sancti & Angeli cognoſcant cogitationes cordium? Neg. An peſte graſsante teneantur Eccleſiarū paſtores aegros inuiſere? Neg. Moderator Dr. Abbat Vicecancel. Reſpondens Dr. Algionbye. Opponent. Dr. Gordon. Dr. Hollande. Dr. Tomſon. Dr. Fielde. Dr. Riues. Dr. Harding. Dr. Ayrie.
Quaeſtiones in Medicinâ. An mores nutricum à puerulis cum lacte imbibantur? Neg. An creber ſuffitus Nicotianae excoticae ſit ſanis ſalutaru? Neg. Moderator Dr. Warner. Reſpondens Dr. Paddy, Eques auratus. Opponent. Dr. Aileworth. Dr. Buſt. Dr. Guinne. Dr. Gifford. Dr. Aſhworth. Dr. Chennell.
Quaeſtiones in Iure Civili. An index in iudicando teneatur ſequi legitimas probationes in indiicio deductas, contra veritatem ſibi privatìm cognitam? Aſſir. An Inductae vel foedera ſint bonae fidei, vel ſtricti iuris? Sūt bonae fidei. Moderator Dr. Gentilis. Reſpondens Dr. Blincowe. Opponent. Dr. Weſton. Dr. Bird. Dr. Martin. Dr. Huſey. Dr. Budden. Dr. Lloid.
Quaeſtiones in Morali Philoſophiâ. An tueri fines imperij ſit maius quam amplificare? Affirm. An iuſtum & iniuſtum conſtent lege tantum, non naturâ? Neg. Moderator Mr. Fitzharbert Procurator lenior. Reſpondens Mr. Ballowe. Opponent. Mr. Barkham. Mr. Langton. Mr. Kinge. Mr. Winniffe. Mr. Juckes. Mr. Thorneton.
Quaeſtiones in Philoſophiâ Naturali. An operâ artis poſsit aurum conflari? Negat. An imaginatio poſsit producere reales effectus? Affirm. Moderator Mr. Porter. Reſpondens Mr. Andrewes. Opponent. Mr. Lapworth. Mr. Baſkervile. Mr. Clayton. Mr. Mocket. Mr. Pinke. Mr. Boulton. OXON, 1605.