Quaestiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, decimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1630

Quaestiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, decimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1630

Table of contents

QVAESTIONES INSACRA THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN VESPERIIS, DECIMO DIE IVLII, ANNO DOM. 1630.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HANNIBALIS POTTER.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS ENGLISH.

Quaestiones Inceptoris RICHARDI GARDYNER.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS STVBBING.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IACOBI MARSH.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HENRICI LOCKETT.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE HOWELL.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVILIELMI BOSWELL.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVILIELMI DILLON.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IONATH. BROWNE.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

QVAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN COMITIIS 12o Die Iulij, Anno Dom. 1630.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

[Page]

QVAESTIONES INSACRA THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN VESPERIIS, DECIMO DIE IVLII, ANNO DOM. 1630.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HANNIBALIS POTTER.

An

Omnia opera infidelium sint peccata? Aff.

Bona opera fidelium justificent? Neg.

Dubitatio Pontificia sit inimica Evangelio? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS ENGLISH.

An

Mors Christi fuerit libera, & spontanea? Aff.

Anima Christi fuerit oblatio pro peccatis? Aff.

Passio Christi, Sanctorum, & Martyrum passionibus sit adimplenda? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris RICHARDI GARDYNER.

An

Panis & Vinum in Eucharistia transubstantientur? Neg.

Impij participent nuda tantùm signa? Aff.

Communicandum sit in vtraque specie? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS STVBBING.

An

Homo possit se praeparare ad fidem? Neg.

Semel Iustificati, sint semper justificati? Aff.

Ecclesia deferenda sit propter admixtos impuros? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IACOBI MARSH.

An

Ecclesia Catholica, & Visibilis sit eadem? Neg.

Christus verè satisfecerit pro peccato? Aff.

Poenitentium opera poenalia dici possint satisfactoria? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris HENRICI LOCKETT.

An Sancti defuncti

1 Sint invocandi? Neg.

2 Pro viventibus speciatim intercedant? Neg.

3 Rectè & ritè à Pontifice Romano canonizentur? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE HOWELL.

An

Princeps civilis supremam habeat potestatem in res & personas Ecclesiasticas? Aff.

Ecclesiae regimen, ex praescripto verbi Dei, debeat esse Monarchicum? Neg.

Potestas Papalis & Regia possint simul consistere? Neg.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVILIELMI BOSWELL.

An

Magistratus possit accusari? Neg.

Plures possint eundem simul accusare? Neg.

Absolutus à crimine possit iterum accusari? Neg.

[Page]

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVILIELMI DILLON.

An

Sponsalia propter amissam pudicitiam sint dissolvenda? Neg.

Cessante Ratione Legis, cesset Lex? Aff.

Venditori qui minùs dimidiâ parte valoris acceperit, debeat succurri? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IONATH. BROWNE.

An

Testes inter se contrarij aliquid probent? Neg.

Testis sibi ipsi varius & contrarius, puniatur de falso? Aff.

Sit aliqua poena constituta ex Iure Civili pejeranti divino nomine invocato? Aff.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

An

Securiùs insaniat qui nulli fidem adhibet, quàm qui omnibus? Aff.

Historicorum praejudicium rebus gestis detrahat? Aff.

AEmulationi debeantur scientiarum Apices? Aff.

Respondente HEN. CLAY Inceptore.

QVAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN COMITIIS 12o Die Iulij, Anno Dom. 1630.

An

Fidei Mysteria & rationis placita sint verè contraria? Neg.

In ijs quae de fide non sunt, opinionibus variare sit libertatis Christianae? Aff.

Curam habentes animarum insigni vrgente necessitate teneantur peste laborantibus Sacramenta ministrare? Aff.

Respondente AEGID. THORNE S. T. B.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

An

Medicus per imperitiam occidens Hominem ex maleficio teneatur? Aff.

Liceat verbis provocato respondere convitium falsò dicenti: tu mentiris? Aff.

Per exercitium Mercaturae derogetur nobilitati? Aff.

Respondente GEORG. RIDDELL.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

An

Infoelicior sit qui fortunas amisit, quàm qui nondum est assequutus? Aff.

Astrologus contingentia certò praevideat? Neg.

Plus possit opinio quàm veritas? Aff.

Respondente HEN. BELLAMY Art. Mag.

Information about this book

Title statement

Quaestiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, decimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1630

University of Oxford.

Edition statement

1630

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A08717

ID [STC]

STC 19016.12

ID [STC]

ESTC S3315

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

33143314

ID [OCLC]

ocm 33143314

ID [VID]

28374

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A08717)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 28374)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1885:106)

Source

— Quaestiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, decimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1630, University of Oxford..

Extent

1 sheet ([1] p.).

W. Turner,. [Oxford :: 1630]. (Imprint information from STC (2nd ed.).) (Reproduction of original in: Society of Antiquaries.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.