Quæstiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, duodecimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1628

Quæstiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, duodecimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1628

Table of contents

QVAESTIONES IN SACRA THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN VESPERIIS, DVODECIMO DIE IVLII, ANNO DOM. 1628.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE PRICHARD.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ANTHONII SAVNDERS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ROBERTI ADAMS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE CHAFIN.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS DOWLE.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris CAROLI TOOKER.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GILBERTI IONES.

Quaestiones Inceptoris DAVIDIS LLOYD.

Quaestiones Inceptoris FRANCISCI BABER.

Quaestiones Inceptoris RICHARDI HART.

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA DISCUTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVLIELMI TAYLER.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOANNIS SAVNDERS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOANNIS SPEED.

Quaestiones Inceptoris SAMVELIS BAVE.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Ferdinand Sadler

QVAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN COMITIIS 14o Die Iulij, Anno Dom. 1628.

John Cowling

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

Oliver Lloyd

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

John Speed

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

William Ramsden

[Page]

QVAESTIONES IN SACRA THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN VESPERIIS, DVODECIMO DIE IVLII, ANNO DOM. 1628.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE PRICHARD.

An Gratia gratum faciens sit Qualitas inhaerens? Neg.

An Peccatum originale sit mera Carentia Originalis Iustitiae? Neg.

An Liceat Fidelibus cultui Idololatrico interesse, sub praetextu bonae Intentioonis? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ANTHONII SAVNDERS.

An Auxilium gratiae praevenientis sit efficax independenter à libero arbitrio? Aff.

An Reprobatio site massâ corruptâ? Aff.

An Lex poenalis obliget ad culpam? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris ROBERTI ADAMS.

An Descensus Christi ad inferos, sit articulus fidei? Aff.

An Detur Purgatorium? Neg.

An Orandum sit pro Defunctis? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris THOMAE CHAFIN.

An Aliquis possit perfectè implere legem Dei in hâc vitâ? Neg.

An Opera renatorum sint verè meritoria? Neg.

An Aliqua dentur peccata suâ naturâ venialia? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOHANNIS DOWLE.

An Decimae debeantur Ministris Christianis? Aff.

An Clerici sunt liberi à jugo potestatis Secularis? Neg.

An Liceat Ministris matrimonium contrahere? Aff.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Quaestiones Inceptoris CAROLI TOOKER.

An Testamentum ad simplicem interrogationem alterius factum, valeat? Neg.

An Iuramentum per procuratorem praestari possit: Aff.

An Filius, qui ante paternam Dignitatem nascatur, patris Iura obtineat? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris GILBERTI IONES.

An Ex oris similitudine probetur Filiatio? Aff.

An Morum similitudo praesumatur in Filio? Aff.

An Obsequium pro Ecclesiastico sit Simoniacum? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris DAVIDIS LLOYD.

An Mare sit liberum? Aff.

An Naufragium excuset exercitorem? Aff.

An Dux belli possit inconsulto principe cum hostibus pacisci? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris FRANCISCI BABER.

An Promissio poenae in contractu matrimoniali interposita valeat? Neg.

An Statutum de dote lucranda, habeat locum in dote promissa? Aff.

An [...]rum doris marito debitum, ex Statuto pertineat ad Sponsum? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris RICHARDI HART.

An Testamentum ob praeteritionem Filii, sit ipso Iure nullum? Aff.

An Legitima liberorum Statuto vel Consuetudine prorsus tolli possit? Neg.

An Liberi, propter matrimonium abs (que) consensu patris contractum cum indignâ personâ, possint exhaeredari? Aff.

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA DISCUTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

[Page]

Quaestiones Inceptoris GVLIELMI TAYLER.

An Victus humidus febricitantibus, semper sit exhibendus? Aff.

An Senes facile jeiunium ferant? Aff.

An Characteribus aut verbis morbi possint profligari? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOANNIS SAVNDERS.

An Pueris annum 14om non attingentibus sectio Venae sit licita? Neg.

An Vtero gerenti mulieri sanguinem tuto mittere possimus? Aff.

An Cruentatio cadaveris sit certum indicium praesentis interfectoris? Neg.

Quaestiones Inceptoris IOANNIS SPEED.

An Sanguinis missio quandoque conveniat in febre purpuratâ post macularum apparitionem? Aff.

An In Epilepsia sit aliquid divini? Aff.

An Senectus sit morbus? Aff.

Quaestiones Inceptoris SAMVELIS BAVE.

An Medicamenta Empirica exhibeantur vel applicentur tutò? Neg.

An Hepar sit subjectum morbi Indici? Aff.

An Icterus, à calculo in vesicula fellis generato, sit curabilis? Neg.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN VESPERIIS.

Ferdinand Sadler

An Major sit intemperantia Intellectus quàm sensuum? Neg.

An Amor sit optimus Artium Magister? Aff.

An Major sit Animarum quàm Vestium inaequalitas? Aff.

An Respondente FERDINANDO SADLER Inceptore.

QVAESTIONES IN S. THEOLOGIA DISCVTIENDAE OXONII IN COMITIIS 14o Die Iulij, Anno Dom. 1628.

John Cowling

An Arbitrium humanum determinet gratiam divinam? Neg.

An Voluntas sit activa in prima conversione? Neg.

An Voluntatis obliquitas sit Originalis peccati necessarius effectus? Aff.

An Respondente IOH: COVVLING.

QVAESTIONES IN IVRE CIVILI DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

Oliver Lloyd

An Represaliae sint licitae? Aff.

An Res Bello captae & recuperatae, sint priori Domino restituendae? Neg.

An Laesae Maiestatis reus sit, qui nationem non foederatam conficiendi naues, artem instruxerit? Aff.

Respondente OLIVERO LLOYD.

QVAESTIONES IN MEDICINA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

John Speed

An Totus homo subjectum sit Medicinae? Aff.

An Vita possit arte prorogari? Aff.

An Dies & hora mortis à Medico possunt praedici? Aff.

Respondente IOANNE SPEED.

QVAESTIONES IN PHILOSOPHIA DISCVTIENDAE IN COMITIIS.

William Ramsden

An Scientiarum compendia sint dispendia? Aff.

An Aetas quae (que) vt est maximè literata, sit etiam maximè bellicosa? Neg▪

An Optima sit philosophandi ratio, ITA VIDETVR. Aff.

Respondente GV. RAMSDEN in Art. Mag.

Information about this book

Title statement

Quæstiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, duodecimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1628

University of Oxford.

Edition statement

1628

Publication

Publisher

Text Creation Partnership,

Place of publication

Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :

Date

2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).

ID [DLPS]

A08712

ID [STC]

STC 19016.10

ID [STC]

ESTC S1606

ID [EEBO-CITATION]

20235124

ID [OCLC]

ocm 20235124

ID [VID]

23874

Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Series

Early English books online.

Notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A08712)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 23874)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1711:18)

Source

— Quæstiones in sacra theologia discutiendæ Oxonii in vesperiis, duodecimo die Iulii, anno Dom. 1628, University of Oxford..

Extent

1 broadside.

s.n.,. [Oxford :: 1629]. (Imprint suggested by STC (2nd ed.).) (In double columns.) (Reproduction of original in the Bodleian Library.)

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.