THE FIRST AND INTRODVCTORY Treatise, conteining a searching of the true meaning of the Revelation, beginning the discouerie thereof at the places most easie, and most euidently knowne, and so proceeding from the known, to the proouing of the vnknowne, vntill finally, the whole groundes thereof bee brought to light, after the manner of Propositions.
THE FIRST PROPOSITION. In propheticall dates of daies, weekes, moneths, and yeares, euerie common propheticall day is taken for a yeare.
THIS Proposition is proued by apperance, by a law, by practise, and by necessitie. By appearance, because the common weeke is called a weeke of daies,Gene. 29.27, as in Genesis (according to Ieroms translation) Imple hebdomadam dierum. i. Fulfil a weeke of daies. And the common year is called a year of daies,Iere. 28.3.11, as adhuc duo anni dierum: Within two yeares of daies: 1. Mach, 1.30. and Post duos annos dierum: After two years of daies: inferring therby that there is another week of yeares, containing seuen yeares, as the common week containes seuen daies. And another yeare of yeares, containing 360. years, as the common year (not intercalar) among the Hebrews & Grecians, containedIosephus Scaliger de emend. Temp, 360. daies. Secondly, by the Leuiticall law, (which is the figure of all propheticall veritie) it was instituted, that as in the common weeke, six daies were for labour, and the seuenth for rest: so shuld there also [Page 2] be a weeke of yeares, in the which the land should bee six years laboured,Exod. 23. Leuit, 25. and rest the seuenth: Making so the common week of daies, to resēble the figuratiue week of yeares, and so consequently, euerie day to resemble a yeare. Thirdly, by the propheticall custome and practise, euery day represented a yeare: as in Numb. Iuxta numerum 40. dierum, Num. 14.34 quibus considerastis terram, annus pro die imputabitur, & 40. annis recipietis, &c. After the number of fourtie daies, in vvhich ye searched out the land, the year shall be counted for a day, and in fourtie years yee shall receiue &c. And in Ezech. Ego autem dedi tibi annos iniquitatis eorum numero dierum, &c. And I haue giuen thee the yeares of their iniquitie by the number of daies. And afterwardes, Et Assumes iniquitatem domus Iudae 40. diebus, Ezech. 4.5.6 diem pro anno, diem inquam, pro anno dedi tibi. And thou shalt beare the iniquitie of the house of Iuda fourtie daies, a day for a yeare, euen a day for a yeare, I haue giuen thee. Fourthlie vpon necessitie of saluation, al christians must confesse, in the seventie weeks of Daniel, a day to be taken for a yeare, extending in the whole to 490. yeares; otherwise, that prophecie of the Messias comming wold not fal vpon the just time of Christs comming,Dan. 9.24 as necessarily it ought to do. So then a propheticall day is a yeare, the weeke seuen yeares, the moneth thirtie years (because the Hebrue and Grecian moneth hath thirtie daies) and consequētly the prophetical year is 360. years.Iosephus Scaliger de emend. temp. Beside this common propheticall day, there is another greate and extraordinary day, whereof hereafter shall be spoken.
2. PROPOSITION. The seuen Trumpets of the 8. and 9. chapters, and the seuen Vials of the 16. Chapter, are all one.
THis is proued, in that both the seuen Vials, and also the seuen Trumpets are the seuen last plagues: The seuen vials, in that by the text they are called, The seuen last plagues: these same being hereafter called, The seuen golden Ʋialles, Ap, 15.1. & 7 and the seuen Ʋials of the wrath of God. [Page 3] As to the seuen Trumpets, the last conteineth the day of judgement, as testifies the Angels oath, swearing,Apoc. 16. [...] Quod tempus non erit amplius, sed in diebus vocis septimi Angeli, cum coeperit tuba canere, Apoc. 10. [...] consummabitur mysterium magnum Dei, &c. That there shal be no more time, but in the daies of the seuenth Angell, when he shal blow the trumpet, the great mysterie of God shall be finished. Which mysterie, Paule to the Corinthians, maketh the latter day and resurrection; saying, Ecce mysterium dico vobis, &c. Beholde, I declare vnto you a mysterie. And againe, In momento, in ictu oculi, 1 Cor. 15.5 [...] in novissima tuba (canet enim tuba) & mortui resurgent: In a moment, in the twinkling of an eie, at the last trumpet (for the trū pet shall blow) and the dead shall arise. And seeing then the seuen trūpets follow one another in order, in the eight ninth, tenth, and eleuēth chapters, and the last containeth the day of judgement, and generall resurrection; Therefore, must the seuen trumpets be also the seuen last plagues, & consequently, they and the seuen vials must be al one. Moreouer, for confirmatiō hereof, they agree in their principall tearmes; the second trumpet with the second Vial; the third trumpet with the third Viall; the fourth trumpet with the fourth Viall; the sixt trumpet with the sixt Vial; the seuēth trumpet with the seuenth Vial: So, that thereby we may be sure, and conclude both those trumpets, with those Vials, and also the rest of the trumpets with the rest of the vials, respectiue in purpose, meaning, time, and in al other circumstances, to be one and the selfe same thing.
3. PROPOSITION. The star and locusts of the fift trumpet, are not the greate Antichrist and his Cleargie, but the Dominator of the Turkes and his armie, who began their dominion, in anno Christi 1051.
BY the former proposition, the fift vial is al one with the fift trūpet: But in that vial (saith the text) there [Page 4] arose such a plague against the seat of that Antichristian beast, that his kingdome was darkned, and they did gnaw their tongues for sorrowe. So that this may no waies be himselfe that arose against himself, but rather some other godlesse tyrant like him, whome wee shall prooue to be the Apostate Mahomet, and his locustes the Turkes: first, by the name of their Cheiftanes: secondly, by the length of their raigne: Thirdly, and last of all, by all the tokens and circumstances contained in the text. As to the first, they shall haue (saith the text) their King, whose name shal be in Hebrue Abaddon, and in greek Apollyon, and in Latine (as S. Ierome translateth it) Exterminans: Hier. de int. nominum, & in English a destroier, or a waster. But so it is, that trying frō language to language the names of Princes, ye shall onlie find both their temporall and spiritual kings names to signifie the same that Abaddon in hebrue, and Apollyon in greeke doeth: for their temporall king is called Turca, which is asmuch to say, as a Waster or destroyer, as testifieth P. Melancton in Carion hisChron. lib. 1, fol. 8. & lib. 5 fol. 107. Chronicles. And their spiritual kings name Mahomet Hier. de int. nominum., signifieth delens, a destroyer or waster: and beside that, it signifieth also a Messenger or Angel, most agreable with this text, where he is also called, the Messenger or Angel of the depthes. Therfore, these locusts by the name of their Chieftaine, agreeth certainely to bee the Turks. Secondly, as to the space of their dominion, the Turkish Dominators raigned 150. yeares, and so long lasted these Locustes, to wit, fiue moneths: which being prophetically taken, (because this is a Prophecie) maketh just 150. yeares, as is prooued by the first Proposition. And so long lasted the dominion of the Turks, before they were subdued by the Tartarians: to wit, from the daies of Zadok, their first Dominator, an. Christ. 1051. to the time that Changius Chan of Tartarie subdued them, An. Christ. 1201. So then, in length of dominion these Locusts agree to be the Turkes. Thirdlie and last of all, the whole circumstances and tokens [Page 5] of the text, agrees most conuenientlie with the Turk, as at length our paraphrastical & historical discourse shall prooue. Wherefore, the Star that in the fift trumpet fel downe from heauen, and his Locusts that arose, must needs be the Mahomet, who fell from his former Christian profession, and became an Apostate, and out of the smoke of his heresie, stirred vp the Turkes to be his armie.
4 PROPOSISION. The kinges of the East, or four Angels, specified in the sixt trumpet, or sixt vial. Cap. 9. & 16. are the four nations, Mahometanes beyond and about Euphrates, who began their empire by Ottoman, in the yeare of Christ, 1296. or thereabout.
FOr proof hereof, there nedeth no other argument, than the perfect concord of the whole tokens of the texts, cap. 9. & cap. 16. agreeing so in euerie point with that historie, that no other historie can be applied therto. For first, cap. 9. they are called Angels; that is to say, Messengers euill or good, executers of Gods will: So were these Mahometanes messengers sent of God, to scourge the Christians falling away. Secondlie, cap. 16. they are called Kings of the East: and so are these Mahometanes indeed Kinges of the East. Thirdlie, they were in number foure (saith the text) so were there of these Mahometanes foure chiefe nations; to wit, Turks, Tartarians, Saracens, and Arabians: and foure imperiall or royall families; to witte, Assimbeis, Candelors, Caramannes and Ottomannes. Fourthlie, they were hitherto bound (saieth the text) about the riuer Euphrates: and so haue they their residence about Euphrates, where they were so bound & tied by ciuill & intestine warres, that they came not by west Euphrates to make conquest, till after this yeare of Christ 1296. which time the whole Mahometicke Empire ouer the most part of the said four nations, came from the other three families, [Page 6] in the onlie hande of Ottomannus their first Emperour. Fiftlie, these were appointed (saith the Text) at this time to slay the third part of men. And so did they, what by corporall, and what by spirituall death, slay, conquest, and poyson with heresie, all Asia and much of Europe, euen the large third part of the world. Which propertie can bee attributed to none other hitherto, but to the saide Mahometike Armie, which exceeded far, anie Armie hard of in Christian histories. And therfore, sixtlie, ar they numbred to so great a multitude in the text, to wit, two hundred thousand thousands horsmen. Seuenthlie, as out of the mouthes of the Deuill, the Antichristian beast, & this fals Mahomet, proceeded out three vncleane spirits, stirring vp the world to battel, as the Text specifies: So, by the historie it is found, that out of their mouthes proceeded such inspirations of the Deuill, and deuilish exhortations, that stirred vp (in fierie wrath, in smoking heresie, and in sulphurious and bitter auarice) the whole worlde to battell: that is to say, these Mahometanes, Emperors of the whole Orient, against the Antichristian beast, supreame head of the Occident, Hier. de int. nominum to fight in Armageddon: that is to say, to fight in the mountaine of the chosen fruite, and in the mountaine of the Euangell: euen in Asia minor, and Europe, and in other landes of the Christians, and among Gods elect fruit, and chosen professors of his Euangell, troubling them on both sides, which at length and orderlie shall be founde in our paraphrasticall and historicall Discourse, together with all the rest of the smaller circumstances contained in the text. So, then by these perfect properties wee conclude, the sixt Trumpet or Viall, to bee spoken of the great Empire of these four nations Mahometanes, which began in Anno Christi 1296. vnder their first Emperour Ottomannus.
5 PROPOSITION. The space of the fift trumpet or vial containeth 245. years, and so much also, euery one of the rest of the trumpets or vials doe containe.
SEing at the powring out of the fift vial, or sounding of the fift trumpet, the Turkes began their dominion vnder Zadok, in Anno Christi 1051. by the thirde proposition: & by the fourth proposition, at the sounding of the sixt Trumpet, & powring out of the sixt Viall, the whole foure nations Mahometanes began their great Empire in anno Christi 1296. Therefore, the fift Trumpet or Viall indured from the 1051. yeare, to the 1296. yeare, which is the space of 245. yeares. Nowe, that euerie one of the rest of the Trumpets or Vialles doeth containe the same space, it is probable by these reasons. First, because in euerie distribution, aequalitie is most apparant and probable, and so these seuen ages, termed by trumpets and vialles, appeare to haue no reason, why one should bee longer and another shorter, but rather all alike. Secondlie, as in those 245. yeares the effectes of the fift Trumpet and Viall were performed (as now is prooued) so by our paraphrasticall and historicall Discourse you shall finde, that in the former 245. years, the effect of the fourth Trumpet and Vial, and in the 245. yeares before these, the effect of the third Trumpet or Viall was perfourmed: and consequently, the effects of euery one of the rest of the trumpets or vials were perfourmed in their owne space of 245. yeares, ingendering so in these intervals of 245. yeares a perfect harmonie & analogie betwixt the prophesie and historie. Thirdly, because every one of these ages are tearmed and distinguished by the sounds of trumpets here, as the Iubelees were inLeuit. 25, 9 Leviticus. For there, at the end of every 49. year, and beginning of the 50. yeare the trūpets sounded, making betwixt everie sounding thereof 49. yeares precisely for a Iubelee interuall without any oddes, as the name Iubileus betokens, [Page 8] which signifieth a Trūpet or Cornet: Therfore, must those ages also contain certain whole Iubelee interualls,Hier. de int. nominum. preciselie without any ods: otherwise, apparātlie, they woulde not haue bene limited here by the soundes of Trumpets, as the Iubelees are. Then, if euerie one of these ages doeth containe foure Iubelees, which is 196. yeares, or sixe Iubelees, which is 294 yeares, the one shall be so few, and the other shal bee so manie, that the historie could not agree thereto: Therefore, fiue Iubelees, which is 245. yeares (as the middest betwixt extremities) agreeth exquisitlie. Fourthlie, it is found in histories, that great mutations of Empires followed 245. years one after another: as, Ierusalem was destroied An. 71. An. 316. Constantine trāsported the Imperiall seat from Rome to Byzantium, and in Rome Pope Syluester began the Papisticall kingdome. Anno 561. or thereabout, Totila king of Goths burned Rome, & vsurped the dominion thereof. Anno 806. Charlemaign receiued the newe Empire of Germanes and Romanes. Anno 1051. Zadok began the first dominion of the Turkes. Anno 1296. Ottoman began the first Empire of the foure nations Mahometanes. Last of all, about the year 1541. arose our true professors against the kingdō of Antichrist. And euerie one of these great mutations followed 245. yeares one after another. And this moueth Carion, and other Historiographers, to affirme by diuers obseruations, that fiueCarion. lib. 4. de Henr. 4. Imp. hundred yeares (as groslie they thinke, or rather exactlie, 490. yeares) is fatalis periodus imperiorū: the fatal period of Empires, for that it is about twise 245. yeares. Fiftlie, 245. yeares, is the just halfe of the greate Iubelee, or seuentie weekes of Daniel, containing 490. yeares: And because the worlde would not stand whollie seuen of these great Iubelees; therefore S. Iohn by the Spirite of God deuideth seuen halfs of the great Iubelee, among the seuen Trumpets, or vials. Sixtlie, ther are books of the Iewes, containing (as they alledge) doctrines proceding frō the mouthes [Page 9] of the Patriarches, affirming euery great Angel of seuē to rule the world 490. yeares: which wee (wanting the warrant of Scripture) can neither affirm nor condemn. Alwaies (if it be so,) the halfe thereof, to wit, 245. years is taken in steade of the whole, because (as is saide) the time to come to the worlds end, woulde not containe seuen whole, and to containe fewer diuisions than seuen, that had bene repugnant to the propheticall manner, that deuides all by seuen: as seuen seales, seuen trū pets, seuen vials, seuen thunders, &c. So then, for conclusion, euerie trumpet or viall endureth 245. yeares.
6 PROPOSITION. The first Trumpet or Viall began at the Iubelee, in anno Christi 71.
SEing by the third Proposition, the fift trumpet or viall began in Anno 1051. And that by the fift proposition euerie trumpet or viall containeth 245. years, it must needs followe by just count, that the first trumpet or viall began in Anno 71. The second in An. 316. The third in An. 561. The fourrh in An. 806. The fift (as is already prooued) in An. 1051. The sixt also in An. 1296. The seuenth in An. 1541. And that this 71. yeare of Christ, and consequentlie, the first yeare of euerie trumpet or viall was Iubelee, you may consider by the Discourse of Iosephus Scalig [...] de emendat. temporum.
7 PROPOSITION. The last of the seuen Seales, and first of the seuen Trumpets or Vials, begin both at once, in An. 71.
THis appeareth euidentlie, for euen by the text (cap. 8.) the seuenth seale being opened, that verie hour the seuen Angels receiued their trumpets to blowe; for hauing said in the first verse, and when hee had opened the seuenth seale, there was silence in heauen about halfe an houre: he subjoyneth immediatelie (ver. 2.) And I saw the seuen [Page 10] Angels, &c. receiue their seuen Trumpets. And further, after he hath shewed (ver. 5.) how Christ powred out the fiery coales of his wrath, in reuenge of the blood of his Saintes (which doubtles, was vpon Ierusalem, which shead it) incontinent hee subjoyneth (verse 6. and 7.) that then the seuen Angels prepared themselues to blowe. And the first blewe his Trumpet, &c. So therefore, justlie at this destruction of Ierusalem, in Anno Christi 71. make wee both the last seale, and first Trumpet or Viall to beginne. And this is also confirmed by the former calculations, which come backwarde from the fift Trumpet or Viall preciselie, to the yeare of this destruction.
8. PROPOSITION The first Seal beginneth to be opened, in Anno Christi 29. compleat.
THis is prooued by this reason. The opening of the first Seale (cap. 6.) and outgoing of one riding vpon a white horse, &c. is interpreted to bee the word of God, in the 19. chap. vers. 13. which passed out victoriouslie, conquering and piercing our heartes with the arrowes of feruencie and godlie zeale. This behooued onlie to beginne at that time that Christ was baptized, and began to preach and open vp the sealed doctrin of our saluation, which was in the end of the 29. yeare of the age of Christe: and about the beginning of his thirtieth yeare (as Luke testifieth) So,Luke. 3, v. 23 then consequentlie, the first seale beginneth to be opened about the end of the said 29. yeare of the age of Christ.
9. PROPOSITION. Euerie Seale must containe the space of seuen yeares.
THe first Seale beginning to bee opened in Anno Christi 29. as by the former proposition is prooued, [Page 11] we say, that the second seal beginneth in An. Christi 36. The third beginneth in An. 43. The fourth in An. 50. The fift in An. 57. The sixt in An. 64. And finallie, the seuēth beginneth in An. 71. proceding ever aequally by seuen yeares interual, for these reasons. First, becaus in al distributions, aequalitie is most apparant and probable: and trueth it is, that the first seale could not begin at the terme and yeare of Christ 29. proued by the former proposition, & the seuēth seal at the term of the yeare of Christ 71. prooued by the seuenth Proposition, and proceed aequallie: vnlesse that euerie seale containe seuen yeares. Secondlie, because in proceeding, and giuing seuen yeares to euerie seale, ye shall finde the effect of euerie seale to bee perfourmed within the seuen yeares of that seale: And so the harmonie to bee perfect betwixt these seales and the just historie, as in our paraphrasticall and historicall Discourse shall appeare more at large. Thirdlie, because all comptes of yeares within a Iubelee, were reckoned among the Leuits and Prophets by weekes of yeares,Exod. 23 Leuit. 25 euerie weeke containing seuen yeares, as the Iewes doe obserue yet vnto this day: and this space of seals opening, proceeding from the yeare of Christ 29. to the Iubelee in An. 71. is lesse than a Iubelee interuall, for it is but 42. od yeares: and therefore, the diuision ought of necessitie to fall by weekes of yeares, or by seuen yeares. Fourthlie, the Angell in Daniel reckoneth 70. weekes of yeares betwixt the commandement to build Ierusalem, Dan. 9.24 and the latter destruction of Ierusalem, including the Messias comming. And this Angell calleth his wordes closed & sealed, Sermones clausi & signati: words closed & sealed: Dan. 12.9 wher by justly these 70. weekes may be called sealed weekes. Now, because these 42. od yeares of the seales are certainlie a part of the seuen sealed weeks of Daniel: Therefore, wee may justlie affirme these seales to bee sealed weeks, and so consequentlie euerie one of them to containe seuen yeares.
10 PROPOSITION. The last Trumpet and Viall beginneth anno Christi 1541 and should end in anno Christi 1786.
SEing by the third Proposition, the fift Trumpet or Viall began in Anno 1051. And by the fift proposition, euerie Trumpet or Viall containeth 245. yeares: it must needes followe, that the seuenth Trumpet or Viall began in Anno Christi 1541. and consequentlie it should end 245. yeares after: which is in Anno 1786. Not that I meane, that that age, or yet the world shall continew so long, because it is said,Mat. 24, 22 that for the Elects sake, the time shall be shortned: but I meane, that if the world wer to indure, that seuenth age should continew vntill the yeare of Christ 1786.
11 PROPOSITION. The seuen Thunders, whose voices are commanded to bee sealed, and not written (cap. 10.4.) are the seuen Angels, specified cap. 14. vers. 6.8.9.14.15.17.18.
THis tenth chapter doeth agree with the twelth of Daniel almost in euerie point: there doth he likewise shewe, that those verie selfe same mysteries are sealed, yet but for a time, saith the Angell, in these wordes,Dan 12, 4. & 9.13. Tu autem Daniel, claude sermones, & signa librum vsque ad tempus statutum, &c. But thou, O Daniel, close vp the vvordes, and seale the booke, vntill the appointed time. And againe, he saith, Vade Daniel, quia clausi sunt signatique sermones, vsque ad praesinitum tempus. Goe thy vvay, Daniell, for the vvordes are closed and sealed vntill the appointed time. This time that these mysteries were closed, appeareth to be the time of darknesse alreadie past, vnder the Antichristiā errors, now hope we in God, that those mysteries ar able to be found out, seing that time is expired. Thē to our purpose, let vs confer the tokens of the seuē [Page 13] Thunders, with the tokens of the seauen Angels, specified Chap. 14. And wee shall finde them to agree. For first, at the comming of the seuen thunders, Christ doth offer the open book of his truth. So cap. 14. the first of the seuen Angels bringeth the euerlasting Gospel, and openly precheth out the same. Secondly, cap. 10. Christ by the mightie voice of his worde,Apoc 10.2.8 9.10.11. Apoc. 14.9 as a roaring Lion in the mouthes of his preachers, proclaimed the trueth: then came the seuē thunders; so also (cap. 14.) the voice of Gods heauenly elect is heard as the mightie sounde of waters, and as thunder (vers. 2.) Then came orderlie the seuen Angels (ver. 6.8.9.14.15.17. and 18.) Thirdlie, (cap. 10.) the seuen thunders are sealed vp as a mysterie. So likewise (cap. 14) those seuen Angels are preparers and reapers of Gods greate haruest, and what mysterie is more sealed than that, as testifieth Marke Mark. 13.31. saying, De die autem illo vel hora, nemo scit, neque Angeli in coelo, neque Filius nisi Pater: But of that day and houre knoweth no man, no not the Angels which are in heauen, neither the Sonne but the father: And Paul to the 1. Cor. saying, Ecce, 1. Cor. 15.5 [...]. mysterium dico vobis, &c. Behold I shewe you a mysterie, &c. Fourthlie, (cap. 10.) the thunders are commaunded to be sealed & not to be written plainly. So (cap. 14.) they are so sealed, that they are neither named dulie with their former name of thunder; neither are they placed in their due place, which should haue bene in the tenth chapter, but here are called Angels, and placed in the 14. Chapter. Fiftlie (chap. 10.) they be called thunders and yet are sealed: So (chap. 14.) though they be sealed with the name of Angels,Apoc. 14.2. yet for a token that they be the seuen thunders, hee describeth the sounde of great thunder going before them. Then for a conclusion, in respect of the harmonie betwixt the seuen thunders, & seuen Angels of Gods great haruest, we conclude them both to be one.
12 PROPOSITION The first of the seuen thunders, and the seuenth and last Trumpet or Viall, begin both at once in An. 1541.
IN the eleuenth Chapter it is saide, that at the blast of the seuenth trumpet, the kingdome of the worlde becommeth Christ his kingdome: that is, the kingdom of the Antichrist, and all other prophane kingdomes shall fall, and Christ his kingdome shall bee spread and enlarged ouer all: And this can no other wayes come to passe, but by the preaching of the Euangell, which was of new opened vp, and preached at the comming of the first Angell, whome the Text saith, to haueApoc. 14.6 Euangelium aeternum, vt euangelizaret sedentibus superterram An euerlasting Evangell, to preach vnto them vvhich dwell vppon the earth. Which Angell, by the former proposition, is prooued to be the first of the seuen thunders: Therefore, it followeth consequently, that the newe restoring of the Evangell, the seuenth Trumpet or viall, and the first Thunder or thundering Angell, come all at once. And therefore, by the tenth Proposition they began in anno Christi 1541. For confirmation hereof, after the end of the sixt Trumpet, completed in the ende of the ninth chapter: in the beginning of the tenth Chapter, where the seuenth Trumpet appeareth to beginne (the sixt being newly ended) yee shall finde there declared, howe Christ proffereth the open booke, and manifest doctrine of the Evangel, and then immediatelie that very time, while as Christe by his Ministers, preached and proclaimed out that manifest word, as with the mightie voice of a Lyon: incontinent (I say) that verie time (verse 3.) the seuen thunders began to vtter their voice: And so the beginning of the voice of the seuen thunders, or voice of the first thundering Angell commeth at once with the completing of the sixt trumpet, and beginning of the seuenth; although [Page 15] though the verie latter blast of the seauenth Trumpet be not then come.
13 PROPOSITION Euery one of the first three thundering Angels containeth a Iubelee, and then the last foure al at once compleateth the day of iudgment.
THE first part of this proposition, is at the command of the Angell inDan. 12.9 Apoc. 10.4 Daniel, and in the Reuelation so sealed and closed, that be no part of those textes may it be gathered, how long every thunder or Angell of the greate haruest doth follow after other: yet after the custome, both of the Leuites and Prophetes, who deuide all greate dates by Iubelees: and small dates by weekes of yeares, wee judge most apparantly, this last age to be deuided by Iubelees: and so euerie thunder or Angell of these three, that ar said in the text (cap. 14 ver. 6.8. and 9.) to preceede Gods great haruest, to containe 49. yeares, beginning the first (by the former proposition) at the yeare of Christ, 1541. who vers. 6. and 7.) preached his euerlasting Euangell to the yeare of God, 1590. Which yeare, beginneth the second thundering Angell (verse 8.) and continueth proclaiming the finall decay and fall of Babylon, to the yeare of Christ 1639. Which yeare, the thirde thundering Angell beginneth, who (verse 9.) is stiled the third Angell, and he continueth exhorting and threatning these of the last dregs of the Antichrist to repentance, to the yeare of Christ, 1688 VVhere the fourth thundering Angel, euen Christ himselfe (v. 14. & 16) enters actually vnto his great haruest, to gather vp his elect, at the warning of the fift Angell, euen Gods holy spirit (verse 15) Like as contrarilie, the sixt thundering Angel, executer of Gods fierie and fierce wrath (mentioned v. 17. & 19) is admonished and warned (v. 18) by the seuenth angel cōmander therof, to cut down & tread out the vines of the earth, in the winepresse of Gods wrath: And so by [Page 16] these last foure Angels or Thunders (to wit, by Christ himselfe, and by his whole ministering Angels, vnder the figure of these last Angels) all the whole great day of Gods haruest, and latter judgment is accomplished.
14. PROPOSITION. The day of Gods iudgement appears to fall betwixt the yeares of Christ, 1688. and 1700.
Mar. 13, 32ALthough it be said in Mark, that the day of judgment and houre therof, none doth know: yea, not the Sonne, but the father only: yea let none be so base, of judgment as to conclude thereby, that the yeare or age thereof, is also vnknowne to Christ, or vnable to be known any waies to his seruants; by reason, that first in that same part of Marke, Christ letteth vs not only see, that he knew the age and yeares, neere the which that day should fall, but also to the effect, that we may likewise foreknow the same, he giues vs diuers indices and foretokens, which hee could not, nor would not haue forewarned, if he had bin vtterly ignorant of the time thereof, or yet had minded that we should neuer haue foreknowne the age, and appearant yeares thereof, although the precise day and houre be onely knowne to God. Secondly, although the Spirite of God hath hitherto concealed these misteries from them whom the knowledge thereof might haue endammaged: yet that prooueth not, that the same shall be hidde from vs, to whom the knowledge thereof might bring repentance and amendement: for as the foreknowledg of death, to him that were to liue long, might make the foreknower negligent of his dutie to God, and carefull to prouide inordinately for his long life here: Wherethrough God hath made the houre of death vncertain till it approch: Euen so, if the foreknowledg of the latter day had bin granted to men any waies long before it come, that long assured continuance of the worlde, [Page 17] foreknowne by them so long before, had made them to become more carefull per fas & nefas: for their families and posterities, that were long to stande, than for that heauenlie kingdome, that was long to bee delayed. And therfore, was that mysterie justlie by the prouidence of God closed from our predecessors: but contrarilie, so soone as that day beginneth to approch, God by his Scriptures, shall make the age and years thereof to be manifested, as a spurre in his mercie, to mooue the elected sinners to repentance, and a testimonie in Gods justice, against the hard hearted misbeleeuers, continuing in sinne. Thirdlie, and for confirmation of the former, Christ testifieth, that his comming shall be lik vnto the floud of Noah, before the which,Mat. 24, 37. the world being admonished, both by Noahs preching, & by the visible building of the Arke, woulde not the more repent, nor amend their liues, till vnawares they were all destroyed: and is God now otherwise thā he hath bin?1. Reg. 15 29 Is he (saith the scripture) a man that he shal repent that now, which he did then, and forbeare the like? Nay, but contrarilie, he shall make his own to be forseene of this time, as wel as of that time, seing it is now as necessarie, that Gods Ministers exhort vs to repētāce of that coldnes of charitie, and al other vices that abound in this last age, & to terrifie vs with the certeine & assured approching of the latter day, and destruction of the worlde by fire, as well as the longsome building of the Ark, the deeds, gesture, and apparant preaching of Noah, Gen. 6 3 1. pet, 3.19 was a forewarning 120. years to the olde world, that for their vnlawful lusts, and other their horrible vices, they should be destroied by water. Fourthlie, that the yeares or age of the latter day is not vnknown to Christ, nor euer vnsearcheable to his seruants, is certain by Daniell, to whome, although it is said, Vade Daniel, Dan. 12.9 quia clausi sunt signatique sermones hi: Got thy waie Daniel, for these vvordes are closed and sealed: As to the Apostles, Non est vestrum scire tempora: It is not for you to knowe the times, Act, 1, 7 for that their time was far from the latter day: yet, saith Daniel of the time of reuelation,Dan 12, 4. Signa librum ad tempus statutum, multi pertransibunt, & multiplex erit s [...]ientia, Seale the booke till the appointed time, manie shall goe to & fro, and knowledge shall be encreased: meaning, when as the due [Page 18] time beginneth to approch, these dates shall be knowne, for knowledge shal then abound. And again he saith, Impiè agent impii, Dan. 12.10 neque intelligent omnes impii, porro docti intelligent. The wicked shal doe wickedlie, and none of the wicked shall haue vnderstanding, but the vvise shall vnderstand. Fiftlie, this age or apparant yeares of the latter day, are neither vnsearcheable to Christs seruants, nor vnknowne to himselfe, seeing it is euident, that the Deuils haue a certaine foreknowledge thereof, in that they said to Christ, Venisti huc, ante tempus torquere nos? Art thou come hither, Mat. 8.29 to torment vs before the time? meaning, that althogh they are continuallie reserued in feare & dread, yet (as Peter & Iude testify) their chief torment is not vntil the latter day,2. pet. 2.4 Iude. 7 which they knewe, was not to be at that time. Againe, it is said in the Reuelation, Laetamini coeli, &c. Vae autem terrae & mari, Apoc. 12.12 quia descendit Diabolus ad vos, habens iram magnam, sciens quòd modicū tempus habet. Therfore, reioyce ye heauens, &c. and wo to the inhabitants of the earth, & of the sea, for the deuil is come down vnto you, which hath gret wrath, knowing that he hath but a short time. So then, seeing the Deuill hath great wrath in the latter daies, and doth know that his time is short, shal we say, that Christ shall be ignorant of that, which the Deuill doeth know. Sixtlie, to what effect were the Prophecies of Daniel, and of the Reuelation giuen to the Church of God, and so manie dates of yeares; and circumstances of time, foreshewing the latter day, conteined therintil, if God had appointed the same to be neuer knowne or vnderstood before that day come. Therfore, assuring our selues, that all these Prophecies of the latter day shall be known and manifested to Gods Church, before Christ come to judgment: let vs confer al these prophecies and propheticall figures thereof together, and wee shall finde them come so neere to one time, that verilie the matter is wonderfull. And first (beginning at the Symbole of the the Sabboth) it is thought by the most learned, that the sixe daies of labor, weekly obserued, doth mean & bear the symbole of 6000. yeares, that mankinde shall indure the trauels and cares of this world: and that is confirmed by Peter, who speking of the day of judgment,2. Pet. 3, 8 noteth, that a thousand years shal be as one day in Gods sight: and a day as a thousand yeares: And [Page 19] so consequentlie, the sixe dayes of worke, to represent sixe thousand yeares: after the which sixe thousande yeares of worldlie trauels and cares, then shall come our aeternal Sabboth & rest, in the glorie of heauen, signified by the seuenth daies rest: For that truelie, there is no institution appointed by God to Moses, which (besides the ciuill commoditie) had not also a spirituall figure: And sure it is, that no figure appeareth more consonant with these sixe dayes of worke, and seuenth day of rest, than the present miseries of this worlde, and aeternall Sabboth hereafter. Secondlie, & agreeable with the former, there is a sentence of the house of Elias reserued in al ages, bearing these wordes: The vvorld shall stand six thousand yeares, and then it shall be consumed by fire: two thousande yeares voide or without lawe, two thousand yeares vnder the lawe: and two thousand yeares shall bee the daies of the Messias: And for our offences, which shal be manie and great, shall these yeares lacke which shall lacke. Thus farre saith Elias: Now, the term of these 6000. yeares doeth expire, about the 2000. year of Christ, which term, both by the said saying of Elias, and by Christs owne saying in Mat, appeareth to be shortned. And therefore, thirdlie,Mat. 24.22 Dan. 12 by Daniel we shal approch nerer that term: for he in his 12. cap. intreating both of the first resurrectiō (which is the resurrectiō frō the Antichristiā errors) & of the second resurrection, which is the general resurrection from the dead: such an Angel, as afterwards appereth to Iohn (Reu. 10) teaching him cōcerning the latter day,Ap. 10.5.6.7. doth here appear to Daniel, swearing solemnly a term of prophetical daies, to euerie one of those questiōs, doubted of by the Prophet: of which, the greatest terme is expressed to be 1335. prophetical daies, which (by the 1. proposition) meaneth 1335. yeares,Dan. 12.11. whose beginning are determined in these words, And frō the time that the dayly sacrifice shal cease, & the abhomination put to desolation (or made desolat) shal be 1290. daies: blessed is he that awaiteth & abideth to the 1335 day. As if he wold say, frō that time that both the Iewish dayly Sacrifice shal vtterlie cease, and the abhominable rites of the Gentiles be abolished, to the cōpleating of the gret resurrection from the Antichristian errours, and vtter decay of his kingdome, shall [Page 20] be 1290 years, and then blessed shal he be that abideth and remaineth constant in the small time, that shall be betwixt that and the latter day, which shal fall in the 1335 year, from the taking away of the said Iewish ceremonies, and Gentiles superstitions. But so it is, that these were neither actually taken away by Christes passion, neither in the destruction of Ierusalem, neither other waies els, till miraculouslie in the daies of Iulian the Apostate, Anno Christi 365. This Apostate hauing in despite of Christ, ordained the Iewes to build vp and repaire their Temple of Ierusalem on the one part, & on the other part, hauing sent his Legats to offer Sacrifice in the chiefe Ethnick Temple of the Gentiles in Delphos, and to consult with that Oracle of Apollo there, God sent his thū der from aboue,Cation, Chron, lib. 3 and earthquake from beneath, and thereby ouerwhelmed both those chiefe Temples about one time, so vtterlie, that to this day all the Iewish daylie Sacrifice of the one, & the abhominable Ethnick superstitions of the other, haue ceassed, and bene put to vtter confusion and desolation. But if (after the opinion of some learned men) this text doth mean in the original Hebrue, not the Abhomination to be put in Desolation, but contrarilie, a desolating and wasting Abhomination to be set vp; together also, with the taking away of the former and foresaid daylie Sacrifice: In this case appearinglie, the same date is not the lesse established: for who was a more horrible & wasting Abhomination, than was the foresaide Iulian, that blood-thirstie Apostate, together, with his detestable, idolatrous and magicall decrees, which publiklie he erected and set vp, to bring Christianisme to vtter desolation. So that howsoeuer this Abhomination be expounded, either passiuely, to be made desolate; as the Gentiles chiefe abhominable & idolatrous Oracle of Apollo at that time was made desolate, or actiuelie, that the Abhomination shuld make a wasting or desolation, & that that wasting Abhominatiō shuld be then erected, as the abhominable Tyrant and Apostate Iulian was promoted Emperour, and his cruell decrees of persecution at that time set out: Euen alwaies in that verie same 365. yeare, all the foresaid accidents occurred: for, in that one year both first the foundations of the Iewish Tēple [Page 21] of daylie Sacrifice: as secondlie (in the passiue sense) the said Temple of the Ethnickes Abhominations in Delphos, were by thunder and earthquake both destroyed: as thirdlie (in the actiue sense) that abhominable Iulian, and his decrees for desolating & deuouring Gods seruants, were then set vp. Therfore, from this yeare of Christ 365. wee are commaunded to reckon 1335. years, which falles in An. 1700. And then (saith Daniel vers. 6) shall be the end of all wonders, euen the wonderous and great day of the Lord: But yet, as this Prophecie doth abridge the foresaid prophecie of Elias, so also Christs foresaid saying in Matthew, that came after this Prophecie,Mat, 24, 22, doth apparātly abridge somwhat of this time: for the which, now we proceed to the last Prophecie in the Reuelat. Fourthlie therfore, it is reasoned in the former proposition, that euerie thundering Angell of three, contained 49. yeares, and then comes the great day of the Lord: and by the 12. Proposition, the first thundring Angel, began in An. 1541. to which ad thrise 49. yeares, which is 147. yeares: and so by that account, the latter day will fall in An. Christi 1688. Wherfore, appearinglie betwixt this 1688. yeare, according to the Reuelation, and the 1700 yeare, according to Daniel, the said latter day should fall. And for further confirmation hereof, there is a number put in the end of the 14. chap. of the Reuelation, which appears to be a date of the latter day: for that chapter altogether speaketh of the Lordes great haruest, and latter judgement. There (saith Iohn) The blood came out of the Wine-presse vnto the Horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and sixe hundred stades or courses: as if appearinglie, he would meane metaphoricallie, as wine may be thought to flowe from the presse, or the blood of slaine men in a fielde, to ascend to the horse bridles: so, aeternallie shall the torment of the wicked ascend, after that a thousand and sixe hundred yeares be accomplished: For, these Stades agree well to meane yeares, seeing a stade is that race or course, that one may be thought to run with one breath, before he begin to renewe his breath againe: as one yeare is that race or course, that the Sunne maketh in a circuit, before he begin to renewe his circuit againe. Nowe, counting [Page 22] therefore, a thousande and sixe hundreth yeares, from the time that this was written, which was about the 97. yeare of Christ, as Eusebius in his Chronicle saith, or in the end of the raign of Domitian, as Irenaeus saith, which was in Anno Christi 99. The end of the count shall fall about the yeare of Christ 1697. or the yeare 1699. which is betwixt the saide terme 1688. and 1700. And so the difference of these dates is but small, and if the time of histories wer surely written and obserued, it may be thought, that the difference would bee either lesse, or vtterlie nothing at all.
15. PROPOSITION The 42. moneths,Dan. 7 25. Dan. 12 7 Ap. 11, 12 Apoc, 13. a thousand two hundred and threescore propheticall daies, three greate daies and a halfe, and a time, times, and a halfe a time mentioned in Daniel, & in the Reuelation, are all one date.
EVerie moneth among the Graecians, contained thirtie daies preciselie,lib. de emend. temp. as witnesseth Iosephus Scaliger, and so consequentlie, fourtie two monethes are aequall to a thousande two hundred & threescore daies. Also, three great daies and an halfe, are aequal to them for these reasons. First, by reckoning, because three daies and an halfe, after the propheticall manner (prooued in the first proposition) is three yeares and an halfe: and then counting (after the Graecian maner) twelue moneths in the yeare, and thirtie daies in euerie moneth, these three yeares and a halfe (called in the text, three daies and a halfe) will bee fourtie two monethes, or a thousand, two hundred and threescore daies just. Secondlie, they must be all one, for that in purpose they agree: for it is said, that the Antichristiā beast,Apoc. 11.7. at his rising, slew the two Witnesses of God (which hereafter are prooued to bee the two Testamēts) & their dead carcases (or naked letter) lay three daies & an halfe, and then were they reuiued, and at that time of their reuiving, come a gret decay on the Antichristian citie: So that both by this text, and other good reasons, it appeareth that these Witnesses of Gods trueth, lay dead and silent, [Page 23] & their testimonie neither buried in our brests, nor ingraued in our harts, during al the daies of the Antichrist. And so the time of their lying dead, and the time of the Antichristes raigne to be all one date. Now, the time that they lay dead, is called three daies and an halfe, and the time that the Antichrist raigned, and oppressed Gods Church, is called 42 moneths: wherefore, three great daies and an halfe,Apoc. 11.2 Apoc. 13.5 are all one with 42. moneths, or 1260. daies: It resteth then, to prooue a time, times, and half a time, to be likewise aequall to them, which must needes be for these reasons. First, because it is said, (Cap. 12.6.) that the Woman (which hereafter is prooued to signifie the Church of Christ) fled into the wildernes, where she was nourished 1260. daies: And againe (verse. 14) it is saide, that shee fled away in the wildernesse, where shee was nourished for a time, times, and halfe a time. So then, a time, times, and halfe a time, and 1260. daies must bee both one. Secondlie, this time, times, and halfe a time, or three times and an halfe, correspondent with the foresaid three greate daies and an halfe, are aequall to 1260. daies for this cause. A time taken simplie and without figure, meaneth a yeare, as in Daniel, Nebucadnetzars seuen times that he remained a beaste,Dan, 4.13 20.29 are taken for seuen yeares: Then three times and an halfe, are three yeares and an half, which being counted, wil make 42. moneths or 1260 daies: And so finallie, for conclusion, seeing the raigne of the Antichrist, his blaspheming of God, and oppression of Gods Sainctes, the treading of spirituall Ierusalem vnder feet, the prophecying of Gods witnesse vnto the true and visible Church in humble maner, and their lying deade and silent, vnto the outwarde, visible pretended Church. And the flying of the Spouse and Church of Christ to the wildernesse, and becomming inuisible, by matters concurrent and adjunct, such as apparantlie must at one time begin together, continue together, and end together. Therefore, most necessarilie the dates that the text attributeth to their continuance, to wit, 42. moneths, 1260. propheticall daies, three great daies and an halfe, and a time, times, and halfe a time, must be all one date.
16 PROPOSITION. The 42. moneths, 1260 propheticall daies, three great daies and a halfe: And a time, times and halfe a time, signifieth euerie one of them, 1260 Iuliane yeares.
SEing these dates are prooued by the former proposition, to be aequall, therefore necessarilie what one is, al is, then we com to these 1260 daies, which we say, must needs be either vnderstood so manie natural dayes, or els so manie propheticall daies, which are prooued to bee yeares in the first proposition: But natural or common dayes they can not be, for these causes. First, when the prophetes in number, or great dates mean of natural dayes, they vse to adjoin the definition thereof, by morning and euening, defined in Gene. chap. 1. as Daniel doeth chap. 8. vers. 14. and 26. But that is not done here, this being a prophecie: and therfore, these ar not naturall and common daies, but consequentlie, are propheticall daies. Secondlie, it is not apparent, that so manie Prophets would haue written so much: for onlie a raigne of 1260 of common daies, which is but three yeare and a halfe, seeing manie cruell tyrantes and hereticall Emperours, that did raigne longer ouer Gods Church, were not prophecied of in particular, as Nero, Domitian, and others. Thirdlie, if these were naturall and common daies, then shoulde the Antichrist raigne, but 1260. common daies, which is three yeare and an halfe: but contrarilie, it is certaine, by the Revelation cap. 20.4.5. that the Antichristian beast had authoritie, and did raign at the least a thousand yeares, martyring the sainctes of God, and persecuting them that reuerenced not him and his marke, &c. but spirituallie raigned, and liued as true Christians these thousand yeares, and that the rest of the people should lie dead and drunken in his errours, vntill the end of these thousand years: and should not▪ while then, begin to rise in the firste resurrection, which is, to rise from their errors. So then consequently, these daies (which exceed 1000. yeares) cannot be 1260. of common daies, but 1260. propheticall daies, which are prooued by the first proposition to be 1260. yeares: & so apparantlie, the Antichrist raigning [Page 25] mightily 1000. years: the rēnant, 260. years ar attributed to the falling & decreasing of his kingdom, making therby his whole raign 1260 yeares, to the which, seeing by the former proposition, three great daies and an halfe, or three times and an halfe is aequall, it must needes bee, that euery great day, or euery time, must not simplie signifie a common year, as Nebucadnetzars times did, but must signifie a prophetical time, or yeare,Dan, 4.13 20.29 prooued by the first proposition to be a year of years, or 360. years precisely. For cōfirmation, wherof, it is to be vnderstood, that the first makers of times, to wit the Chaldaeans, Graecians and Astrologes in their directions do agree with this description of time: for they devide the Equinoctial into 360. degrees, and attribute a yeare for euery degree of their directions, wherby the whole time of the great revolution or direction of the whole Equinoctial, wil bee 360 years: & consequētlie, three of these great times & a halfe, or three times & a halfe, revoluing of the whole Equinoctial, will containe 1260. yeares. And so Daniel, writing in the Chaldee tongue to the Chaldaeans, and S. Iohn also writing in the greek tongue to the Graecians, observed their manner of counting times, as being a vulgar compt to them. But now, although it is prooved, these dates to be 1260. yeares: yet, forasmuch as 1260. of Graecian yeares, are but 1242. Iulian yeares, and 8. moneths, or there about: and 1260. Iulian years, are 1277. & an half of Graecian years, making therby, neer 18. years of difference. It rests therefore, to prooue what kind of yeares these be. These (we say) ar common Iulian years, for two causes: First, although the Graecian common year contained but 12. moneths, & 30. daies in every moneth, yet do they adjoin certain intercalar daies, which doth mak every year overhed to cōtain 12. moneths, fiue daies & a quarter, which is 365. daies & a quarter; & so cōsequently, ar ouerhead equal with our common Iulian year. Secondly, among the Hebrue Prophets, where a day is taken for a year, althogh the common year contain but 12. moneths, yet almost euery third yeare, they adjoined an intercalar moneth, by dobling the moneth Adar, which made their Hebrew years ouerhead aequall also with our Iulian years, as testifieth Ios. Scal. de emend. temporum. Hitherto are the difficulties of dates resolued: now followeth the resolution of the principal termes and matter.
17. PROPOSITION. The description of the throne of God in the fourth chapter, is not the description of the maiestie of God in heauen, but of his true religion, wherein he is authorised and sits in the throne among his holy elect on earth.
BEcause it is said in the text, that this throne is set in heauen: therefore, some thinks this to be a vision of Gods glorie in heauen, but that can no waies be for these reasons. First, because heauen, for the most part prophetically, is taken for Gods heauenly Elect or true Church vpon earth. Secondly, because it were superfluous curiositie for vs to know any farther of Gods heauenly estate, and glorie of his majestie, than the simple points of our salvation. Thirdly, because the Scripture testifies, that no pen can describe, nor wit comprehend, the glory of Gods majestie in heauen. Fourthly, because the foure Beasts and 24. Elders, who here are coherent members of his throne, confesseth them selues toApoc, 5, 9, 10 raigne vpon earth, and that Christ hath redeemed thē with his blood. Fiftly, because it is said, that among them, even among these four beasts, arose aApoc. 6. 6. famine and dearth of Barley and Wheat. Therfore, this throne can not be Gods throne in heauen, but must needs be his throne vpon earth among his heauenly elect here: and consequently, are either his Church or true religion: but his Church is not properlie his throne and seate, but rather are these ouer whome hee sits. Therefore, this throne must needes be his trueth and true religion, wherein he sitteth, abideth, & making his residence, therein is authorised and inthronized here vpon earth, among his heauenlie elect servants.
18 PROPOSITION. The 24. Elders, are the 24. books of the old Testament, and (metonymicè) all the true professors thereof.
THese 24. elders, being prooued by the former proposition to be vpon earth, because that the glory of the whol throne (whereof they are one coherent part) is vpon earth, [Page 27] we say now farther, that they do represent the 24 bookes of the old testament for these reasons. First, ab officio, because these ancients are saide in theAp. 4, 10.11 text, to glorifie God day and night, and what thing in earth is God more glorified by, thā by his scriptures & holy writings? whereof these be the first. Secondly, because in name they do agree, for these 24. ar called the auncients, so are these 24. books called the old Testamēt. Thirdly in number they do agree, for these auncients ar 24. so there be 24. authentik books of the old Testament no minate by Ierome, in Prologo galeato. Fiftly, and finallie, what soever is spoken in the Reuelation, in name and behalf of any of the 24 Elders: The same shal ye find specially written in one of these 24. books of the old Testament, as particularly shall be noted in their dewe place of our principall discourse. As to the second part of this proposition, that vnder the name of these 24. books, both the true writers and true professors therof be metonymicè included, it is certaine, otherwaies they could not say, that Christ hath redeemed them,Ap. 5 9, 10 and that they raigne vpon earth.
19 PROPOSITION. The foure beasts are the foure Evangelles with all the true writers and professors thereof.
THat these four beasts are on earth, is also proued by the 17. proposition, in respect the glorie of the whol throne (whereof they are one coherent part) is vpon earth. Wee say now farther, that they do represent the four Euangelles for these reasons. First ab officio, for that these foure beasts doeth here decore the throne, and neuerApoc, 4.8 ceased from praysing God day and night. And what thing on earth doth more adorne Gods true throne and Christian religion, then doeth these foure Euangelles and their true professors, who neuer cease from praising God continuallie? Secondly, they agree in number, for there be foure beastes; so are there foure Evangelles. Thirdly, in their particular and distinct titles or faces, they agree, hauing consideration of the custome of the auncients, that vsed for to intitle the [Page 28] bookes according to the beginning thereof, as in Hebrue, Genesis is called Bereschith, becaus it beginneth Bereschith bara Elohim, &c. and such like other books: as wee also entitle our booke of lawes, Regiam Maiestatem, because it beginneth so. Then in comparison, the faces of these Beasts, are compared to the titles or beginnings of these bookes: because, as men or beasts are readiliest knowne and distinguished by their faces: so are bookes by their titles, and beginninges. And to come in particular; like as in the Reuelation, the Beasts, and in Ezechiel, their faces were, one like a man, another like a Lion, the third like a Bullocke, the fourth like an Eagle. So, of these foure Evangelists, Matthew begins his first face or leaf, at the Genealogie of Christ, as he is a man: and Marke begins his first face or leafe at the voice, crying (like a roring Lion) in the wildernesse, Prepare the vvay of the Lord, &c. And Luke beginneth his first face or leafe, at Zacharias offering incense (as it were a Bullocke) at the alter. And Iohn begins his first face, or leafe, at the high and diuine essence of Christs God head, flying so high in his stile, that he is compared to an Eagle. Fourthlie, in their order of prioritie, according as they first wrote, they agree with Ezechiels order, where the first was a Mans face, that is Matthew, who first of all wrote, and that in Hebrew. The second was a Lions face, and that is Marke, who was the second that wrote, and that in greek. The third in Ezechiel, is a Bullockes face, and that was Luke, who was the third that wrote, and that in Greek. The fourth was the Eagles face, who is Iohn, that wrote the fourth Euangell, and that in Greeke. And so the order of their first editions, agrees preciselie with Ezechiel his order. Fiftlie, their order of translation or edition in Greeke, doeth agree with the order that here Sainct Iohn (who wrote both in Greeke, and to the Greeke Churches) setteth them into: to wit, The Lion, Mark wrote first of all in Greek. The Bullocke, Luke wrote second in greek: Than was the mans face, that is, Matthewes Evangel, trāslated in greek, who now is the third, & before was the first: Afterwards, last of all, the Eagle, Iohn (as before) wrote the fourth Euangel. And so correspondentlie, as Ezechiel, the hebrew Prophet, writing to the Hebrews, preferreth [Page 29] Matthewes hebrew Euangell, for that it was first written. So Sainct Iohn, a Graecian Prophete, writing to the Graecians, spake of Matthewes greek Euangel, and setteth it in the third order, for that it came after both Markes and Lukes. Sixtlie, the precise time of their firste writing, and occasion why they did write these foure Euangelles, agreeth with the history and time of the foure first Scales, where their first comming is mentioned. For first, when the word of God passed out on the white horse in the first seale, betwixt the yeare of Christ 29. and 36. then (saith the text) one of the four beasts said, come and see, &c. that is, Matthew the Apostle, who came that time, and wrote his first Euangel in hebrew, exhibiting the same to be seen of the Iewes expresly, for conuerting thē, that Gods word of his new couenant might victoriouslie go out among them, to conquer & ouercome (as saith the text) Then, in the second seale, when S. Steuen and S. Iames were martyred, and greate persecution rose against the Church of God, viz. betwixt the 36. and 43. year of Christ, then (saith the text) the second Beast saith, Come and see: that is, the second Euangel was at that time set forth by Mark, to be seen & read, in comfort of the afflicted Church. Afterward, in the third seale, when hunger and dearth arose, betwixt the 43. and 50. year of Christ, the third Beast saith, Come and see, and this is Luke, whose Euangell came to light at that time, and was set forth to be seen, and also writeth of the same dearth, in his booke of the Acts of the Apostles. Lastly,Act, 11.28 in the fourth seale, when deadlie heresies arose against the Diuinitie of Christ, betwixt the 50. and 57. yeare of Christ. Then (saith the text) came the fourth Beast: and so indeed at that time did Iohn write the fourth Euangell, beginning at the description of Christs Diuinitie, expreslie against the said Heretiks. Seuenthly, these foure Beasts wings, eies, and all their other tokens and circumstances, contained both in Ezechiels Prophecie, and here in the Reuelation, doeth so properlie agree with the foure Euangelists, that they cannot be so conuenientlie attributed to anie other, as shal be shewed at length in the principall Treatise. Eightlie, it appeareth by Hierome and others learned, that these indices and tokens, so aptlie [Page 30] agreeing to these foure Euangelists, and to their faces, haue confirmed the ancient Fathers of the Church, both to receiue these foure Euangelles true and certaine, as also to repell manie false Euangelles, written in the name of Thomas, Matthias, Bartholomaeus, and other Apostles. Also the Evangels of Basilides, Luk. 1.1 Apelles, and Nicodemus. For Luke testifieth, that manie pretended to write Euangelles. Then certainlie, seeing there could not, nor cannot redounde to the Church of God so greate a commoditie, by interpreting these foure Beastes anie other waies, we haue great occasion, by all these aforesaid reasons, to repose vs also vpon this interpretation. As to the seconde part of this proposition, that vnder the name of these foure Beastes or four Euangels, both the writers and the professors thereof are metonymicè included: it is certaine, otherwise (as in the discourse of the former proposition is declared) they could not say, that Christ hath redeemed them, or yet that there aroseApoc. 5.9. Apoc. 6 6 famine among them, for neither can that redemption, nor such famine properly convene to any but to men.
20 PROPOSITION. Gods Temple, although in heauen, is also taken for his holy Church among his heauenly Elect vpon earth, and metonymicè for the whole contents thereof.
IN figuratiue speakings, heauen is taken for Gods holie Elect vpon earth, whome hee hath preordained to inherite heauen, as is alreadie shewed by the 17. proposition, where, by the throne of God in heauen, is meaned his trueth and true religion in earth among his heauenlie Elect here: So in this place also we say, that Gods Temple in heauen, is more properlie his Church among his heauenly Elect vpon earth, than among the glorified bodies in heauen: for that glorified number, called theApo. 21.22. new Ierusalem, ar said properly, to haue no distinct Temple among them, for Iohn saith thereof, Et templum non vidi in ea, &c. I saw no temple therein, &c. So, no Temple being there, this Temple properlie must be among Gods heauenlie Elect vpon earth, and consequently his holie and true Church. As to the second part of this proposition, it agreeth [Page 31] verie well with Christs speaking, saying of the material Temple, Qui iurat in altari, Matth. 23 20.21. iurat in eo & in omnibus qui super illud sunt, & quicunque iur auerit in templo, iur at in illo et in eo qui habitat in ipso: Whosoeuer sweareth by the altar, sweareth by it and by al things vpon it, and vvhosoeuer sweareth by the Temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth in it. Euen so likewise, vnder the name of this spiritual Temple, is not onely meant Gods true Church among his heauenlie Elect vpon earth, but also is meaned metonymicè the whole contentes thereof, to wit, Gods truth and true religion; yea, (although vnproperlie) euen the verie Majestie of God himselfe, because he dwelleth in his Church, and they in him: for proofe whereof, though Iohn saith first, I saw no temple therein, because ther is no distinct Church properlie, where all is the Church, yet doeth [...]e subjoyne immediatlie, Dominus enim Deus omnipotens templum eorum est & Agnus: For the Lord God almightie, and the Lambe are the temple of it: calling the Deitie to be their Church that are glorified, or rather to them in stead of a Church; although more properlie the Deitie is the thing contemplate, not the Temple it selfe. From this Temple in this sense,Ap. 14.15.17. that is from the majesty of God, ar said to go out the last Angels of Gods great haruest and latter judgment, to gather in his Elect, & to destroy the wicked. And so the Temple of God in heauen, is properlie taken for his heavēlie elect Church vpon earth, and for their true doctrine, profession, and religion: yea, and (although improperlie) euen for the Deitie it selfe. Hereupon followeth this corollar, agreeable with al the former senses: that when this Temple is said to be open, then it meaneth Gods true Church to be visible, his trueth and true religion preached and opened vp; and finally, the Majestie of God to be knowne, & reuealed by that preaching of his trueth. And when againe, that Temple is closed or filled with fume, it signifieth Gods true Church to lurke, and become inuisible, his trueth, and true religion, and knowledge of the Deitie and diuine Majestie to bee obscured, darkened, and closed vp. As in confirmation hereof, it is saide,Apo, 15.5.8 That the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimonie was open in heauen, and the seuen Angelles of the last plagues come out of the [Page 32] Temple, and afterwardes no man was able to enter into the Temple againe till these seuen plagues were fulfilled: which agreeth preciselie with the euent after all the former senses, to wit, that the true Christian Churches, professors of Christ his true testimonie, wer visible and patent, their true doctrin and Christian religion opened vp, and the majestie of God thereby made known, and manifested in the daies of the Apostles: and afterwards, vpon neglecting their testimonie, & vpon the contempt of the manifestation and opening vp thereof, there proceeded all the whole plagues of the seuen last ages, during the which, the fume of Gods wrath was so great, that by the Antichrist he made his true Church lurke and become invisible, and his truth and true religion, and knowledge of the divinitie to be obscured and darkened: so that none might visiblie enter or haue accesse to the knowledge therof, til by the seuenth and last plague, that the Antichrists kingdome began to fall, and then after 1260. yeares darknesse, was that true Temple of God opened and made manifest, as is plainlie saide in theApoc. 11.19 seuenth Trumpet or age. So then, this Temple, the opening closing, and opening againe thereof, agrees so well with the Ecclesiasticall historie in all points after the former senses, that we must conclude, by this Temple of God in heauen, to bee meaned his holie Church among his heauenly elect vpon earth, with the whol contents and pertinents thereof, to wit, his trueth, true religion, and (after a maner) the verie Deitie it selfe.
21 PROPOSITION. The two witnesses mentioned (Reue. 11) are the two Testamēts, and (metonymicè) the whole true professors thereof.
THis is prooued by their number, name, and office, and by the whole circumstances of the text. First, by their number, they are two witnesses: so are they two Testaments. Secondlie, by their name they are called Witnesses: so in that language of Latine, wherein they haue bene vsed most, these 1200. years & more, they are called Testamenta frō the word Testis, which is to say a Witnesse, as being witnesse of Gods wil: [Page 33] all other doubtfull testimonies of men being refused, as testifieth Christ, saying,Ioh, 5, 34, 39 I receiue not the testimonie of men, &c. But afterwarde hee saieth, Search the Scriptures, for they are they vvhich testifie of me. Thirdlie, concerning their office, (as Oliues) they annoint vs Kings and Priestes to God: And (as Lanterns) they illuminate vs with knowledge of the true way of saluation. So that who (as the text saith) that woulde peruert them, God shall consume him with the aeternall fire of hell; therfore, it is said, Omnis sermo Dei-ignitus, pro, 30, 5 & clypeus est sperantibus in se, ne addas quidquam verbis illius: Euerie vvorde of God is fierie, and he is a shield to those that trust in him, put nothing vnto his vvordes. Lastlie, the whole circumstances of the text (which here for breuitie are omitted, and at amplified in the principall Treatise) doe so harmonicallie agree with these two Testaments, that necessarilie, they bee the two Witnesses here made mētion of. As concerning the witnessing of men, because it is said, Omnis homo mendax: Euerie man is a liar: psal. 116, 11 Rom, 3, 4, Ioh, 5.34 And againe, Non ab homine testimonium accipio: I receiue not the record of man: Therfore, no men are simplie to be accepted in place of these Witnesses. Yet notwithstanding, so farre as men doe professe these Testamentes, and doe purely preach the simple doctrine thereof, in that case these men, are metonymicè included vnder these Testamentes, for that their worde is not their owne worde, but the worde of these two Testaments.
22 PROPOSITION. The Woman clad with the Sunne (chap. 12.) is the true Church of God.
THis is prooued; first, by the Song of Salomon, where Salomon, bearing the figure of Christe, who descended of him: his beloued Woman and Spouse, throughout al that Canticle beareth the figure of Christes Church. Secondlie, spirituall Hierusalem, which is Christes Church by diuerse Scriptures, is also called Christes Spouse in the Reuelation. Apo. 21. Ephes. 5 [...] 23 Thirdlie, bodilie marriage, is by Sanct Paule called a Symbol, and a Sacrament of the vnion of Christ and his Church: whereby the husbande representeth Christ, and the Woman [Page 34] espoused representeth the Church. Fourthlie, in the whole Scriptures, idolatrie being called spiritual whordome, necessarily the true worshipping of God is represented by perfect Spousage, and the true Church that worshippeth him, is his Spouse, and so the Church of God is figured by a Woman. Last of all, the whole tokens of this Woman, contained in the text so viuelie and perfectlie agree with Christes Church (as is declared in the principall treatise) that necessarilie wee must conclude, this Woman to meane the true Church of God.
23 PROPOSITION. The Whoore,Apoc. 14, 16, 17.18 Cap. 19. who in the Reuelation is stiled spirituall Babylon, is not reallie Babylon, but the verie present Citie of Rome.
IN the former proposition was described the holie Spouse of Christ, here is to bee described the filthie Whoore of Sathan, there that Ladie, who is adorned with the Sunne, Starres, and heauenlie vertues: here that Adultresse, who glories in golde, siluer, precious stones, and worldlie pleasures: there shee, who is persecuted by the Dragon, here she vnto whome the Dragon doeth giue authoritie: There she, who is chaced into the wildernes, and hath no lodge to hide her in; here she who impireth aboue all people, and is the Metropolitane citie of the world. And finallie, seeing in al things this Whoore, or whoorish Babylon, is contrarious to Christes holie Spouse, lette vs, and all Christians trie her out, as our detestable and deadlie enemie, and see what Babylon she is. We say then, that this Babylon, is not that reall 1 Babylon of Chaldee, but Rome, for these reasons. First, for that this Babylon is calledApoc, 17, 5 mysterium Babylon, that is to say, mysticall or figuratiue Babylon: Therefore, it is not Babylon it self in 2 Chaldee. Secondlie, that olde Babylon in Chaldee was destroied long before Sāct Iohn wrote this, as was prophecied by Esay, by Ieremic, and by Dauid, and neuer rose to authoritie: But this Babylon, euen when Sanct Iohn wrote, raigned ouer theEsa, 1 [...], 17 Ier 51, 11 psal 136 Apoc, 17, 18 Kinges of the earth: Therefore, it is not olde Babylon, but meaneth Rome, which at that time, and a thousand and foure [Page 35] hundred yeares after that, had Empire ouer the whole earth. Thirdlie, this mysticall Babylon, is said by the text, to 3 be set vpon seuen hilles, and therefore it is Rome, Apoc. 17.9. which is called Septicollis, as Virgil testifieth, saying,
Septemque una sibi muro circumdedit arces:
Virgil, lib. 2 Geor, & lib. 6. aeneid.
Within the vvalles of that citie, cōtained ar seuen hilles hie.
And Propertius saith,
Septem urbs alta iugis, toti quae praesidet orbi,
On hilles seuen that citie stands, that hath empire aboue al lands.
Againe, Sanctparte, 2, tra. 5, Epist, 59 & part, 3, tract, 8, Epist. 30 Ierome libro Epistolarum, in diuerse places approoueth the same: and Eutropius in his Historie, and Publius Ʋictor de descriptione vrbis Romae, and diuerse other doe name these seuen hilles, this way, as Palatinus, Coelius, Ianiculus (otherwise called Capitolinus) Aventinus, Quirinalis, Ʋiminalis, and Esquilinus. Fourthlie, because the manner of Families, Kinges, and Kingdomes, is to entitle themselues by the name of the first Conquerours, or most notable personnes, as the whole Romane Emperours were called Caesares, according to the name of the firste Emperour Iulius Caesar. So Rome hauing obtayned the Monarchie ouer the whole kingdomes of the earth, whereof the Babylonians were the first Conquerours, therefore, justlie is called Babylon, as succeding in her place. Fiftlie, per Icona, scu 5 à simili, for that in idolatrie, pride, couetousnesse, and exceeding crueltie against the Sanctes of God, Rome was nothing inferiour to Babylon. Sixtlie, becaus by vse and custome of ancient 6 and learned Writers, Rome is verie often called Babylon, as by. Ierome, lib. Epistolar. part 2 trac [...] 6. Epist, 80 [...] part. 2. tract 5. Epi. 9 8 part. 3. trac [...] 8. Epist, 30 Also by Tertullian in his booke against the Iewes, and lib. 3. against Marcion. And for final confirmation hereof, al they that would prooue S. Peter to haue remained at Rome, say, that by Babylon in the end of the firste Epistle of Peter, is meant Rome, from whence he then wrote, as Ierome saith, in his Prologne vpon Marke, in these wordes, Ec Petrus in Epistola prima sub nomine Babylonis, figuraliter Romam significans: And Peter in: his first Epistle, vnder the name of Babylon, figuratiuelie signifying Rome.
And so for assured certēty, this whorish & mystical Babylon. [Page 36] is verilie Rome. But some seeking sophistical subterfuges wil say, that this Babylon meaneth olde Rome, and not this present Citie of Rome, that now is, as though both were not one, euen builded both within one wall, and vpon these selfe same seuen mountaines: and finallie, one selfe same towne, both in name, seate, and gouernement, and in all thinges else, onelie that where one house was ruined, destroyed, or burned by the Gothes, and other enemies, another within the same walles is builded vp againe. Of these then it is to be demaunded, if olde Rome hath bene so destroyed, that it is not to be founde, or that neuer inhabitant hath dwelt in it since that time, neither euer so much as a candle hath shined therein hitherto, as is prophecied of Babylon in the Reuelation, chap. 18, But the contrarie beeing true: Therefore, it is not onlie this olde Rome: but all whollilie Rome that is called Babylon, and as yet, resteth to be that way for euer destroyed.
24 PROPOSITION. The great ten-horned beast, is the whole bodie of the Latine Empire, whereof the Antichrist is a part.
FOr proofe hereof, the moste notable tokens assigned by the text to this Beast, doeth onelie agree to the Latine or Romane Empire:Apoc. 17.18 For firste (saieth the Text) the Woman that sate vpon this Beast, is the great Citie, that sitteth ouer the Kinges of the earth: So the chiefe seate and citie of the Latine or Romane Empire, is that great citie Rome, that had Empire ouer all the kingdomes of the earth. Secondly, saith Daniel, Dan. 7 17. there shal foure cheif kingdomes arise vpon earth, vnder the figure of foure beastes: Whereof (by plaine interpretation hee saith) the fourth beast that had these ten horns,Dan. 7.23 is the fourth kingdome of the earth: And so it is, that the firste greate kingdome or Monarchie being of the Babylonians: The seconde, of the Medes and Persians: The thirde, of the Graecians. The fourth and laste, is certainlie the Monarchie of the Latines or Romanes: and therefore, that fourth beaste [Page 37] which both there in Daniel, & here in Iohns Reuelatio, hath ten hornes, must necessarilie be the Romane or Latine Empire. Thirdlie, this Beast, whereon the said whoorish woman or Babylonical citie sitteth, hath seuen heads, which the textApoc. 17 [...] interpreteth to be seuē mountaines: Euen so Rome, the chief city or Metropolitane seat of the Latine Empire, is set vpon seuen hilles, nominated and proued in the third reason of the former proposition. Fourthlie, there be here seuen kings (saith the text) that is, seuen sorts of royal gouernmēts:Apoc. 17. for a King is oft taken for a whole race of Gouernors of one sort, as in Daniel cap. 7. So had Rome seuen royal gouernments, to wit, Kinges, Consulles, Dictators, Trium vires, Tribuns, Emperours, and Popes: Of which (saith the text) fiue ar fallen, one is, and another is not yet come: Euen so was it indeede, that before S. Iohns daies, those fiue gouernments, viz. the Kinges, Consulles, Dictators, Trium-uires, and Tribuns wer past, and in his daies raigned the Emperours, and the Popes were not come to the gouernement while after his dayes. Fiftlie, (saieth the text) this Beaste that Sainct Iohn did see, was, and is not, and shall rise of lowe estate, and shall goe into decay: Was (saith hee) because the Romane Empire, and gouernment of Emperours, was before that time, that hee wrote: Is not (saieth hee) because the time wherein hee wrote, the Emperour Domitian was dead, and the Empire waked, for the nexte Emperour Nerva Cocceius was not yet chosen, as appeareth by Irenaeus, who saieth, that Sainct Iohn sawe these visions, in the end of the raigne of Domitian. Then (saith hee) Hee shall rise of lowe estate: Euen so arose there a new Emperour, not of the noble ancient blood of Romanes, but of base estate, to wit, the saide Nerva Cocceius, who was the first straunger, or Barbarian Emperour: This (saith hee) shall goe into decay: that is, shall goe shortlie into decaie: for otherwise simplie, all fleshe must goe at some time into decay: And so was it indeed, that this Nerua goeth shortlie into decaie: For hee liued Emperour but one yeare, three monethes, and nine daies, and then he died. Againe, the Beaste (saith that same text) Was, and is not, and yet is, that is to say, there were Emperours before Sainct Iohn wrote, none when he wrote, and [Page 38] yet when he wrote the Empire stood, and the gouernment by Emperours was vnabolished: for, incontinent vpstart Nerua, and manie moe Emperours after him: so that the Empire might be said at that time, in a manner not to bee, and in a maner to be. Sixtlie (saith the text) the Beaste that was, and is nor, is euen the eight, and is one of the seuen: and that meaneth, that that royal gouernment of the Empire by Emperours, which was immediatelie before S. Iohn wrote, and vaked when hee wrote, by the decease of Domitian, that same gouernment shal be the eight gouernment, & was also one of the said seuen gouernmentes: and euen so was it, that after the Romane Emperours (who was the sixt gouernement) were abolished, by the Hunnes, Gotthes, and Ʋandalles, and thereafter, Rome seuenthly gouerned be the Popes, then eightlie, start vp by Charlemaign a newe race againe of Emperours, intituled of Germanes and Romanes. So that euidentlie the Emperours wer the eight estate that gouerned Rome, and were also one of the former seuen, euen the sixt gouernment thereof, as is alreadie said. Seuenthlie (saith the text) one of these seuen heads receiued a deadlie wound, and that deadlie wound was healed: So the chief of the seuen gouernments of the Romane Empire, to wit the Estate of Emperours was cut off and abolished by the Hunnes, Gotthes, and Ʋandalles, and vaked from the daies of Augustulus, Anno Christi 475. vntil that Charlemaign came, in Anno 806. At which time, the estate of Emperours was of new repaired, & whollie made vp again. Eightlie, this beast hath ten crowned hornes, that is, ten kinges (saith the text) which when Sainct Iohn wrote, had not receiued their kingdoms, but should receiue their kingdome at an houre after the beaste, and then (saith he) shal they giue their power againe to the Beast, and all at once shall make warre with the Lambe: but at length (saith he) these shal hate and destroy that harlot beast: Euen so came it to passe of the Romane Empire, that long after S. Iohns daies, when that old Empire began to fal, the estate of Emperours to be abolished, (as is said) immediately thereafter sprang thereof ten Christian Kinges, who againe gaue their power, assistance and fortification, to the next Gouernours [Page 39] of the new Latine Empire, which was to the Pope, authorising him, as their supreame heade, with whome they concurred, fighting against Christ, as hereafter shall be shewed: But at length shal these ten Christian Kinges, destroy that spiritual harlot and idolatrous Empire, as (praised be God) England and Scotland, with some others haue alreadie begun. Ninthlie, that beast is the Latine Empire, and the chiefe seate thereof is Rome: because in the text, both the plain name of the Latine Empire is figuratiuely expressed, and the figuratiue name of Rome is plainlie expressed. As to the first, howe the plaine name of the Latine Empire, which is [...], is figuratiuelie expressed, read the 29. proposion following.Apoc. 17.5 As to the second, how the name of Babylon (which is plainly said to be the figuratiue name, that was written in the Womans forehead that sate on the beast) is the perfect, certaine and accustomed figuratiue name of that citie Rome, that sitteth ouer the Latine Empire, is most euident by the former proposition. Finallie, all the rest of the smaller circumstances of this ten-horned beast, contained in the text, doe so properlie and fitlie agree with the Latine Empire (as in the principall treatise shall be found at length) that we must necessarilie conclude, that selfe same Beast to meane and signifie the whole Romane Empire.
Resteth then the second part of this Proposition, to proue the Antichrists Kingdome to be a part of the greate Romane or Latine Empire. Seeing then it is prooued, that this whole ten-horned beast signifieth the whole Romane Empire. Necessarilie, it that one part of this beast signifieth, must also be a part of the Romane Empire: But one part of this beast signifieth the Antichrist: Therefore, the Antichrist must needes be a part or mēber of the whole Romane Empire. That one parte of this beast, to wit, the litle blasphemous horne thereof in Daniel, and the blasphemous mouth therof in the Reuelation, doeth signifie the Antichrist: it is certaine by the tokens set downe in the text, wherein it is said, that that blasphemous Apo. 3, 5 6 mouth andDan. 7.25 horne, should speake proud blasphemie against God, and against his Sanctes, and against them that bee in heauen: And should chaunge times, and lawes, and should make warre against [Page 40] Gods Sanctes, and ouercome them, and subdue them vnder his tyrannie, for the space of 1260 propheticall daies, prooued to be yeares in the 1. and 16. proposition. So this muste necessarily be the Antichrist, that hath so wicked and so long a raigne: And consequentlie, the Antichrist must rise of the Romane Empire, and be a member thereof. Secondlie, his raigne must bee of that Romane Empire, for that he must sit in spiritual Babylon, which by the former proposition, is proued to be Rome. And so Rome should become the den of all diuelishnesse and Antichristian errours, as in the principall Treatise vpon the 17. and 19. cap. shal be shewed.
25 PROPOSITION. The two horned Beast, is the Antichrist and his kingdome, it alone.
PAule describing the2, The, 2 Antichrist & his kingdome, among certaine speciall notes to knowe him by, giues manie of these same tokens of this two horned beast: to wit: here in Iohn, Apo, 13, 11 this Beast hath two hornes like the Lambe: that is, double power, spirituall and temporal: so there in Paul, he sheweth himselfe to be like God,2, The, 2, 4, 9 and hath tēporall power, wherby he is aduersarie to Gods seruants: and spirituall power to work wonders, albeit lying wonders. Secondly (saith Iohn) he shall speak like the Dragon: so saith Paule, hee shall come by the working of Sathan, &c. Thirdlie, (saith Iohn,) hee wrought great wonders and signs,Ap. 13, 13, 14 and deceiueth men therby: So in Paule, he came with power, and signes, and lying wonders, and in all deceaueablenesse of vnrighteousnesse. Whereby (doubtlesse) that man of sinne, and sonne of perdition, euen the verie Antichriste, whome Paule there described, is this very same two-horned beast, mentioned here by Iohn. And for confirmation hereof, the properties of this two-horned beast (cap. 13) are the selfe same properties of the false Antichristian Prophete (cap. 19.) For this two-horned Beaste is saide toAp, 13, 14, 15 worke greate miracles, before the first tenne-horned Beaste, and to deceiue them that dwelt vpon the earth, whome hee caused to worshippe the image [Page 41] of that firste beaste and to receiue his marke. Euen so, the false Prophete, which muste needes be the Antichrist, is saide alsoApoc. 19.20 to woorke miracles before that firste beaste, whereby he deceiued them that receiued that beasts marke, and worshipped his Image. Wherefore necessarilie, as of this two horned beaste, and of that false Antichristian Prophet, all the tokens be one: so must also consequently they them selues be both one.
26 PROPOSITION. The Pope is that only Antichrist, prophecied of, in particular.
AMongst the pluralitie of Antichristes, spoken of in the Scripture to be generallie in all ages: there is one particular Apostatik kingdome, who is the chief and principall of al Antichrists, and is that great Antichrist, whom Paul calles the man of sinne, and sonne of perdition, adversary to God, and an extoller of himselfe aboue all that is called God, with diuers other epithets conteined 2. The. 2. Leauing therefore al other smaller Antichrists, this great Antichrist and chiefe heade of all Antichrists, is he whome here we haue to trie out, whom (for remoouing of all doubts) wee say cannot be the Mahomet, neither any Turk, Iewe or Ethnick. First, because it is not apparant, that the spirit of God, wold trauel so carefully, to point them out to vs, by dark mysteries, and secreet signs to be the Antichrist, who when they come, doe with most cleare confession graunt & aduouch thēselues to be Antichristians, as all Iewes, Turks and Ethnicks do plainly confesse: and therfore their owne confession is sufficient to knowe them by, and al farther secreet tokens, wer superfluous. Then must he needs be a latent and not a patent enemie, that the spirite of God so carefully points out: and so no Turk, Iewe, nor Pagan; yea, no plaine Wolfe must he be:Mat, 7, 15 & Act, 20, 19 but a Wolfe in a Lambs skin, even an Antichrist vnder the name of a Christian. Secondly, he must sit, saith Paul, in the Church of God:2, Thess, 2, Therefore an alledged Christian must he be: for no Turke, Iewe nor Pagan hath other sitting, than in their owne Temples: these be not Gods temples, onely the societie of Christians is Gods temple, [Page 42] of their nomber therefore must the Antichrist call himselfe: and among them must he, sit, as a pretended Christian: and consequently must he be no Iew, Turk, nor Ethnick. Thirdly, apart must his raigne be of the Latin Empyre, as is prooved (Proposition 24.) & one pretending friendship thereunto, yea, hee must sit in that spiritual Babylon prooued to be Rome: Then must he not be the Mahomet, nor any Turk, or other Ethnik, but a pretended Christian Prince. Finally, and in a word, this Antichrist is no Turk, Iew, nor avouched Ethnik, because on the one part, all the notes and tokens of the Antichrist, giuen vs by the scriptures, are most evident properties of the Pope, and doth altogether agree to him. And on the other part, the special points of doctrine and conversation, of Christ & his Apostles, ar altogether cōtroverted into his persō: Him therfore shal we proue, both by the synthesis or sympathie, that his properties hath with the Antichristiane tokens, as by the antithesis or antipathie, that hee hath with Christ, to be the very selfe greate. Antichrist prophecied of in particular.
1 And first, to account his most notable Sympathies with 2 the Antichrist. Rome (vnder the name of Babylon) is the 3 Antichrists seate: so in Rome doth the Pope sitte. In the2 Thess, 2, lib. 5 sexti can. Foelicis [...]n gloss. & [...]ib. 3. sexti. [...]it. 16. can. periculoso. Church of God must the Antichrist sit: over Christian Churches doth the Pope sit, professing himselfe their supreame head. The Antichristian kingdome must be a part of the Latine Empyre, and thereof must it proceed (Proposition 24.) so is the Popes kingdom, a part of the Latin or Romane empyre, 4 for in Rome doth hee sit. The Antichrist (who is meere impiety and wickednes) was transported figuratiuely, as in a close vessel, to the land of Shinar, which is Babylon, where he shuld haue his dwelling builded, Zacharie 5. So in figuratiue Shinar 5 or Babylon els prooued to be Rome, doth the Pope dwell and remaine. Christ shewes that there shall arise false Antichristian Prophets,Matt, 24, 26 who shal say, there Christ is in the desert, or he is in the secreet places &c. So the Pope & his Clergie saith, that there Christ bodelie is that hoste, which sometime they carrie in procession in desert & barrē fields, to bles the fruits thereof; at other times they close it vp again in their [Page 43] secreet box beside their Altars. The Antichrist speaking lyes 6 through hypocrisie, shal1, Tim, 4, 3 forbid al his to marrie, and shall commaund abstinence from certaine meates: so doth the Pope vnder hypocrisie, and lying pretext of chastity & abstinence, forbid al his Clergie to marrie, and to eat flesh in Lēt, or on frydaies. The false Antichristian Prophets shall priuilie 7 bring in damnable errours, thereby denying the Lorde that redeemed them, and through couetousnes, they shall with fained wordes make marchandise of Christians (as saith Peter) and shall sell their soules, as saith the Reuelation: so hath the Popes Clergie brought in pardons and indulgē ces,2. pet 2 Apoc, 18, 13 whereby they promise remission of sinnes and the kingdome of heaven, priuilie and in effect therby, denying Christ to be their onely redeemer, and so haue they through covetousnes vnder fained pretext of religiō, made marchādise of poore Christians, selling by such deuillish wares, even their soules to the Devill. The Antichrist the son of perdition shall 8 extol himselfe against al that is called God,2. Thes, 2 Dist, 96 can, satis euidenter so doth the Pope style himselfe God, and causeth Emperours and Kinges to kisse his feete. And Pope Alexander the third trod with his feete vpon the neck of the Emperour Frederick Barbarossa, his clergie singing, Super Aspidem & Basiliscū ambulabis et Leonem & Draconem pedibus conculcabis: In Daniel that blasphemous 9 Antichristian horne, that sprang of the fourth monarchie,Dan, 7.25 & in the Revelation, that blasphemous mouth that was giuen to the Romane beast, had the saints of God vnder his hand,Ap, 13, 5. impyring over them and persecuting them 1260 propheticall daies, prooved by the first and 16. Propositions, to be 1260 yeeres: so the Popes kingdome which is of the Romane impyre, hath had power and authoritie over al Christians, and of these that were most true Christians, such as Iohn Hus, Hieronymus Pragensis, Hieronymus Sauonarola, & of many thousād mo, hath he bene a persecuter these 1260. yeeres, even from the time that Sylvester the first,Dist, 96 and first Pope vnmartyred receiued his three crowns and large patrimonie of the Emperour Constantin, as is alledged betwixt the yeere of Christe 300. & 316. to the year of God 1560. which time the notable decay of his kingdom began. The Antichrists cōming (saith 10 [Page 42] [...] [Page 43] [...] [Page 44] Paule) is by the working of Sathan, [...]. Thes, 2 with all power, and signs, and lying woonders in all deceiuablenesse. So of Popes, 22. knowne (saieth Platina and others) came to the Popedome, being abhominable Necromancers, & exercised their mightie imperiall power ouer whole Christianitie, subdewing & ouerwhelming the most mightie Princes and Emperours thereof: And whereas Paule saith, that hee shall worke with signes and lying wonders in all deceiuablenesse: So hath the Pope aduanced his credite, deceiuing the simple sorte, by his fained fables, and alledged miracles of the Legendary, and de vitis Patrum, & by such juglings, as the holie blood of Wales, and the Maiden of Kent in England, and the fained miracles of Lauret in Scotland; and latest of all, by such as the Spanish Goddesse, with her fiue bloodie wounds, Prioresse of the Abbay of L'Annunciata, in this last 1588. year of Christ, now prisoner there, as a deceitfull witch. And shortlie all the whole indices and tokens of the Antichrist, contained in the Reuelation, (beside these before specified,) doe most perfitelie agree to the Pope, his seate, kingdome, and Cleargie, as shall bee particularlie discussed in our principall Discourse, beeing here for breuitie omitted. It resteth then to shew a certaine of the notable contrarieties betwixt Christe and his alleadged Vicar, the Pope, whereby he shall be found not his Vicar, but his aduersarie: yea, not a Christian, but the Antichrist.
1 And first (saith Matthew) Christ came so soberlie, and so meekelie,Matt, 12 20 that he woulde not haue broken a bruised reede. The Pope came proudlie, ouerwhelming the most mightie Empires: Hee changed the kingdome of France from Chilperike the lawfull king, to Pipin the Popes confederate: he extinguished the king of the Longobards, & broks their kingdōe to this day: he bereft the Exarchat of Ravenna from the Emperour of the Orient, he trode with his feete vpon the neck of 2 Frederike Barbarossa, Emperor of the Occident. Christ wold not worship the Deuil for al the kingdoms of the world, as testifieth Matthew: Twēty two Popes bound thēselues slaues to the Deuil for euer, to be made Popes, as testifieth Platina and other 3 vnsuspected writers. ChristMatt, 21, 12 casteth out the merchandes [Page 45] out of the Temple, the Pope establisheth his marchands in the Temple to sell his Pardons, Masses, and Indulgences. Christ washed his poore Disciples feete: The most rich and 4 mightie Emperours kisse the Popes feete,Iohn. 13, 5 and he doth tred on their neck. Christ honoured marriage in Cana of Galilee, had 5 someIohn 2 Mat. 8 14 1 Cor. 7, 2 married Apostles, and commanded all to marry that culd not liue chast: The Pope forbiddeth his Clargie to marie, though they were never so filthie whoremongers. Christ 6 forbiddeth whoredome of al kinds. Of Popes, 13. were adulterers, three were common brothellers, foure were incestuous harlots, eleuen were impoisoned with vile Sodomie, sevē wer whormongers & erecters of brothel houses. Finally one was a whore, and died of childe in open procession; and all these are named in their own hystories. God forbiddeth 7 that the price of a harlot beDeut 23 18 offered in his sanctuarie. The Pope receiued of everie whoore in his brothels weeklie, a Iulian pennie, which wil amount som yeers, to 40000 Ducats 8 by yeere. Christ payed tribute to the Emperour: the Pope bereft the Emperour of both landes and tribute within Italie. Mat. 17, 27 Christ had not of propertie, so much mony of his own, as to 9 pay his tribute pennie. Mat. 17.27, The Popes propertie is said at this hour to be 18000. Ducats every day:Palmerius also Pope Iohn of Avinion left in store 25. millions of gold. Christ grants libertie of all 10 meats, saying that nothing enters in the mouth that defiles the soul, and commanding vs to eate of al thing, that isMat, 15.11 1. Cor. 2 10 verse 25 solde in the market. The Pope forbideth fleshe in Lent, Friday, and other his fasting times. God misliketh the obseruing of daies, moneths,11 and years. Galat. 4.10 The Pope commaunded to obserue his festiual and holie dayes, septuageses, Lentes, & years of Iubilees, & indictions. Christ is the onely Mediatour betwixt God and man. The 12 Pope makes and canonizeth his own saints,1 Tim. 2, 5 whome he cals Mediatours betwixt God and vs. Christ is both God and man: 13 The Pope is styled, neither God nor man. The fowls of the aire, In prologo Clementina rum in glosstore haue their nests and beasts haue their dennes (saith Christ) but the Son of man hath not where to repose his head, the Pope hath store of Towres, castels, and princely pallaces.Mat. 8.20 Christ threatneth 14 Peter for drawing his sword: the Pope vsurpeth both the tē porall 15 and spirituall sworde:Math, 26 52 for proofe whereof, Pope Boniface [Page 46] the 8. shewe himselfe the one day in his pontifical apparel of a Bishop, the next day cled in armour as an Emperour, beating before him two swordes, proclaiming these words, 15 Ecce duo gladii hîc, Behold here the two swordes. God forbiddeth in hisExo. 20.4 second commandement, not onely the worshipping of Images, but also to make any so vile figures, to represent his so incomprehensible maiestie. The Pope and his Clergie, not onely make they vile images to represent God and his saints, but also, they command to reverence them, to come in pilgrimage bare-footed & bare-headed, kneeling before them, praying such prayers to them, as are intituled in their books; A prayer to the Image of Christ, a prayer to the crosse 16 of Christ,Deut 11 18 19.20 and such others. God hath commāded to engraue these ten commandements on the posts of our houses, & on all patent partes: yea, and in our hearts. The Pope and his Clergie leaues out the second commandemēt, and to make them seeme ten, they devide the last commaundement into 17 two and teacheth them that way to the people. Christ commandsMat. 6.7, vs not to make much babling, nor oft repetitions of prayers as the Heathen. The Pope commaundeth to repeat over your prayers, as to say fiue Pater nosters, fiue Avees, and to say a Trental of Masses, which is 30. Masses, & so to obserue a number as the Witches do, and asLib. Meta. morph. Ovid saith of the Witch Medea in these wordes.
Verbaque ter dixit placidos facientia somnos,
Quae Mare turbatum, quae flumina concita, sistant
Thrise from her lips did wordes redounde, which moueth sleepe and slummering sound.
And staieth storms of roaring seas, & furious floods do set at ease.
And for better proofe hereof, they must haue beads to keep their coūt with. And to speak briefly of their doctrin in one 18 worde, Christ teacheth a religion whollie in spirit & void of all externall ceremonies, except his two sacramentall seales. The Pope hath constitute a religion, consisting wholly in bodily rites, & ful of al external superstitions, partly Ethnike, partly Iewish, which Christ hath vtterly abolished. Finally, 19 both Christ was mocked with a crowne of thorns, and the [Page 47] Pope contrarily honoured with a threfold imperial crowne. As also, Christ shed his blood once, that we might raign spirituallie.20 The Pope sheds our blood daylie, that he may raign temporallie. And so, although in al points of doctrine and conversation, Christ & he be altogether contrary, yet for the breuitie of this treatise, we must pretermit the rest at this present, trusting these foresaide to be sufficient to instruct the found judgment of him, whose hart God hath mollified: as to the Reprobate, the wordes of Christs owne mouth: yea,Luk. 16.31 the Lawe nor the Prophets, neither finally the rising of the dead to teach them, could any waies convert them. And yet, for the more superabundant certaintie of this matter, we wil also remoue certain doubts of Scripture, which might moue the simple sort (by adhearing to the literal sence,) to beleeue that al the Antichrists that were to come, were alredy come, and past in the daies of the Apostles; or that might any waies seeme to purge the Pope from being the Antichrist.
And first, where it is said in saint Iohn. These are the last daies, and ye haue heard that the Antichrist shall come: Euen now are there manie Antichrists, and again saith he,1. Iohn. 2.18 but this is the spirite of the Antichrist, 1, Ioh 4 3 of vvhome ye haue heard that hee shuld come, & now he is in the world. It is to be answered hereunto, that the meaning of the first text is not, that that present time, but the whole age after Christ, is the last age & dayes of the world, in the which, the great Antichrist should come. And euen then, saith he, there were many Antichrists, not that he saith that the great Antichrist was any of thē, but rather, that he meaneth, that there were so many small Heretiks & Antichrists risen vp, that thereby the comming of the great Antichrist was portēded: for Paul maks this placeplain, where he speaks in expres words,2, The, 2 that the mystery of the Antichrists iniquity was euen then begun to work, but himselfe shuld not come, while he who held shuld yet hold stil a while, & then be devided or remoued out of the way: meaning that the mystery of his iniquitie, & spirit of his errours, was then begun to work in these small Antichrists, forerunners of the greate Antichrist, vnto whose errours (saith2. The. 2.12 hee) because the worlde hath attended, and hath left the spirite of veritie, [Page 48] whereby they should haue bene saued: therefore, God shal send vpon them the efficacie of errors, that they may beleeue lies,2, The, 2 11 that is to say, God shall send the greate Antichrist to worke his miracles of lies, &c. As to the second text, it is not spoken of the person of the greate Antichrist, but plainly by the text is meant, of the spirite of his errours, or (as Paul calleth it) the mysterie of his iniquitie, which euen then was in the worlde and wroght in his forerunners, whome Saint Iohn calleth also Antichrists: So be these texts, rightly conceived, it is gathered, that many small Antichristes, (in whome wroght the spirite and mysterie of the great Antichrist) were come in the daies of the Apostles, but yet not the greate Antichrist himselfe. Moreover, in cace it be doubted howe the Pope can be this Antichrist, seeing saint Iohn saith, that the Antichrist denieth the Father and the Sonne,1, Iohn. 2 22 whereas apparantly the Pope denies neither of them. To this it is answered, there be two denialls, the one in mouth and profession plainely, and that way the Pope seemeth a Christian, and not to deny Christ, otherwise he would not be credited of Christians, neither could hee be a meete Mediatour betwixt the Dragon and them, as the Antichrist must be. The other deniall is in heart and deed tacitely, and that way the Pope hath denied altogether, both the Father and the Sonn: for who so denieth the Son, the same (saith the same text immediatly after) denies also the Father,1, Iohn 2.23 and consequently them both: But so it is, that the Pope denies Christ, in that he establisheth other mediators of his canonized Saints, betwixt God and vs, and vindicates to himself power to remit sinnes, and so craftelie maketh Christ but a cipher, without either office of mediation, or of remission of sinnes. Wherfore, in effect the Pope denies the Son, and consequently, both the Father & the Son. And besides this former reason, is not this, certain, that the 22. Necromantik Popes already spoken of, could not be Necromācers, vnles they had by priuat & tacit paction, renounced both the Father and the Son, and became slaues to the Deuil for ever? Also, hath not diuers of them bin espyed & noted with Atheisme, such as Pope Leo the tenth, who when Cardinal Bembus was in commoning with him, of certaine [Page 49] Evangelical histories, made this godles answere. Quantum nobis & nostro coetui profuerit ea de Christo fabula satis est saeculis omnibus notum. It is known evidently to al ages, how much this fable of Christ, hath bene profitable to vs and our Clergie. Of this godles number, there were eight Popes nominated in true register, beside the foresaid Necromantik Popes, and others vnspied Atheists. Here then haue we after foure diuers manners discovered the Antichrist: first, by proouing him to be neither Iew, Turke nor other Ethnik, but a pretended Christian Prince. Secondly, by applying of the speciall tokens of the Antichrist precisely to the Pope. Thirdly, by declaring the notable contrarieties in doctrine and conversation, betwixt Christ and the Pope. Fourthly and last of all, haue wee expounded and remooued certaine doubts, which woulde seem to excuse the Pope, and purge him from being the Antichrist: so that nothing needes more to be said, if it pleaseth God to bestowe his spirit vponthe auditour: otherwise, in vaine doth the Sun clearly shine to the blinde mould-warp. The Lord open the eies of all men, and inspyre the hearts of Princes (as in the Revelation is promised) to destroy that idolatrous seat,Apoc, 17, 16 and bring the Antichristian kingdome thereof to an end.
27. PROPOSITION. The Image, marke, name, and number of the beast: are of the first great Romane beast, and whole Latine impyre vniuersallie, and not of the second beast, or Antichrist alone in particular.
SOme hath mixed confusedly, the tokens of these two Beasts through other, & so haue thought to apply this Image, marke, name and number, to the Antichrist in particular: but here say we, the same doth appertaine to the great tenne horned Beast, and whol Latin Empyre in generall, & not onlie to the Antichrist in particular, and that we proue by these resons. First it is said,Apoc, 16, 2 that in the time of the first Ʋial, which was betwixt the yeare of Christ 71. and 316. there fell a greate plague on them that had the marke of the beast, and on them that worshipped [Page 50] his image. But at this time, the second Beast or greate Antichrist was skarsly come: as by the 9. synthesis of the former proposition is showen, and shalbe more at length in the 36. proposition. Therefore the Image and mark, must be of the first gret Roman Beast or Latin empire, & not of the secōd Beast onely. And where it is saidApoc. 13, 14 16.17.18 that the second Beast and Antichrist, caused to make the image of the first greate Romane Beast, and caused al men to receiue his marke, and that none might buy or sel, that had not the mark or the name of the Beast, or the number of his name; it followes not thereby that there was no Image, mark, name, nor number of the beast, before the Antichrist come; but rather, that the second beast or Antichrist, causeth to repair thē after they wer almost abolished; and that he did confirm & approoue them of new, as in the next proposition is declared. Secōdly, this marke, Image, name & number of the name, appertains to the first gret Roman beast, because it is plainlyApoc, 13, 14 saide, that the image is of the greate Romane beast vvhich receiued the deadly vvound: And thereafter it is said (or at the lest may be gathered by the text,) that not onely the image and the marke, Apoc, 9, 20 Apoc. 13.14 16.17.18 but also the name and number doth appertaine to one selfe same beast. And therefore necessarilie the image, marke, name and number of the name, must al appertain to the great Roman beast and Latin Empyre, and not to the second Antichristian beast onelie
28 PROPOSITION. The Image of the Beast, is these degenerate Princes, that in name onely were called Romane Emperours, and were neither Romans of blood, nor Emperours of Magnanimitie.
SEeing that great ten-horned beast, is the Romane Empyre (by the 24 proposition) and (by the former proposition) this Image, is the image of that Empyre, and (by the text) this image must haue a spirite, and must speake as the Antichrist inspires him. What els can this liuely and speaking Image then be, but a man? yea, even such a man, as doeth represent and beare the figure of that Romane Empyre: and [Page 51] therefore (as saith the text) doe all men woorship and reuerence him. This image then is of two sorts, the one wer these vnworthie Emperors (not of the auncient blood of Romans) in whome the empyre did decay. Of these there were in the daies of this first Vial, as is saide in the discourse of the former proposition; the last of these were extinguished by the Hunnes, Gotthes, & Ʋandalles. The other sort wer the new Emperours, called the Emperours of Germanes and Romanes, of whome Charlemaigne was the first. These also were but a figure of the first old empyre, and were but onely Romane Emperours in name, & neither of their auncient blood, neither hauing such authoritie as they. These did the Pope crown & inaugurat as Emperours, or rather as images of the first empyre. These inspyred he with the spirit of his errours, and made them to speake as he willed them, and then confirmed he their empyre, and proclaimed them Emperours, and caused all men to reverence them, as is said in theApoc. 13.14.15. text. So then for conclusion, al the properties of the beasts image, agree so fitly with these degenerate Emperours, both of the first sort and last sort (which neither Romanes of blood, neither Emperours in effect) that we can cal none other, than thē to be the Images of the ten horned Beast, or Romane and Latin empyre.
29 PROPOSITION. The name of the beast expressed by the number of 666. (cap. 13.) is the name [...] onely.
MAny hauing mistaken this text, haue judged this number to be the number of the Antichrists name in particular, as if it were the number of the second Beasts name, which we haue proued by the 27. propositiō to be of the first beasts name. Here then say we, that name is [...], for these reasons. First, becaus the name of the beast is proued (by the said 27 propositiō) to be the name of the ten-horned Roman beast or Latine empyre in generall, and not of the Antichrist onelie, and so it must either be Romanus or Latinus, but of these two, Latinus is the eldest style: for King Latinus (from whome that people were called Latini, and their cuntrie [Page 52] called Latium) was long before King Romulus, of whome the Citie was called Rome, and the people thereof Romanes. Secondlie,Apoc. 13.17 18. it must bee the number of a mans name (saieth the text) so is Latinus the name of a man, euen the name of one of their first Kinges. Thirdlie, forasmuch as the Graecians had a custome in their mysteries and Oracles, to obserue the number of names, as ye shall finde in diuers partes of Sybilla: And as in that countrey, the name of the flood [...]; is celebrated as holie, because it containeth the number of the daies of the year 365, as Carion testifieth, Chro. lib. 4. wher he describeth the Cattes & Hesses. Therfore, Sanct Iohn (obseruing the custome of them to whome hee writeth) saithApoc. 13, 18 that the number of the Beast, or rather (as he termed it in the former 17. vers.) the number of the Beasts name, is 666. And euen so it is, that [...] contained the number of 666. for λ is 30. α is 1. τ is 300. ε is 5. l is 10. ν is 50. ο is 70. and ς is 200. which altogether make sixe hundred three score and sixe. Therefore, [...] is the verie name of the Beaste, meaned by the saide number. And for better confirmation of this forme of interpretation, Irenaeus Martyr (who was Disciple to Polycarpus, the Disciple of Sanct Iohn) about the ende of the fift book de haeresibus, approoueth this manner of interpretation, saying, Et testimonium perhibentibus his; qui facie ad faciem viderunt Iohannem, & ratione docentibus, quoniam numerus nominis Bestiae, secundum Graecorum computationem, per literas, quae in eo sunt sexcentos habebit & sexaginta sex, &c. And these bearing testimonie, that face to face haue seene Sanct Iohn, and by reason teaching, how that the number of the beastes name, doeth containe sixe hundred three score and sixe after the Graecian reckoning, by the letters that are therein. And thus far saith he generallie, concerning the maner how this text shall be interpreted, as appearingly he had his warrant, receiued mouth by mouth from Sanct Iohn. But as to the particular names, although he reckoneth out [...], with other of his own conceptiō, yet, becaus he had not such particular warrāt mouth by mouth therof, he leaues off to speak determinatly therof: But by the euēt now fallen out, we may more cōstātly affirm [Page 53] this same. For conclusion, seeing by the 24 proposition, the first great ten-horned beast is the Roman Empire, wherof (by the 27 propositiō) the number of his name, is the number of 666, and that (by the text) the same must be the number of a mans name: Therefore, this number of 666. cannot bee yeares, as some do interpret it, nor [...], for [...], which is to denie, nor [...], neither Dic Lux: because although these contain the number of 666. yet these be neyther the names of a man, neither the names of the Latine or Romane Empire, as is proued, that the name of the said number oght to be. Also this name is neither [...] nor [...], because although they both answer the said number, as likewise are the names of a man or masculine, yet are they not the names of the first beast, or Romane Empire. And therfore that name necessarilie must be [...], as beeing not onelie the name of a man, but also the proper name of the firste beaste: as thirdlie containing in it the saide number 666. conforme to the three properties and tokens thereof, warranted by the text.
30 PROPOSITION. Then marke of the Romane beast, is that inuisible profession of seruitude and obedience, that his subiects hath professed to his Empire, since the first beginning therof, noted afterward by the Pope, with diuers visible markes.
IN the ninth cap. of Ezechiel, Ezech. 9.4 it is said, that the Angel marked Gods Elect within Ierusalem, with a marke on their foreheads: the like is said in the Reuelation: Apo. 7 3 4 yet in no historie of these daies, it is hard that anie such visible marke was set vpon the faithfull: wherethrowe that marke must of necessitie mean nothing els, but that profession of seruice and obedience towardes God, which with bolde faces we aduouch as constantlie & openlie, as if we wer visiblie marked therwith. And semblablie, on the cōtrarie part, this mark of the Roman beast or Latin Empire, is nothing els, but that professed seruitude, obediēce, confederacy, or concurrēce, which the subjects thereof haue advouched to obserue thereunto. And for confirmation hereof, it is saide in the Reuel. Apoc, 16, 2 that in [Page 54] the daies of the first Ʋial, there fel a greate plague on them that receiued the beasts mark,Apoc. 16.2 & worshipped his Image: but at that time, (which was betwixt the yeare of God 71. and 316) there was no visible marke, that can be attributed vnto them of that empyre, nor any difference betwixt them & the enemies of the empyre, but onely their foresaid profession; which therfore doubtles must be called in that text, the mark of the empyre. But as to the second part of this propositiō, howe soone the Antichrist, that two-horned Beast came, he caused all men to receiue a mark, which the text discribes so specially, with such notes, as it must needs be a more notable and visible mark, nor the simple profession onlie; for the former mark of simple profession, is but simply called the mark of the beast (Revel. Apoc, 16, 2 16.) but the marks that fell in the time of the Antichrist, are not only said to be marked in their foreheades or right hands: but also, the forme and shape of the mark is expressed by the text,Apo, 14.11, Apo. 15.2. where the same mark is said to be, the mark of the Beasts name or number thereof: as if he would say, there are marks taken out of the beasts name, or rather number thereof, which all his subjectes shall beare or weare sometimes on their foreheads, some times in their handes: which, what they be, followeth in the next proposition.
31 PROPOSITION. The visible marks of the Beast, are the abused characters, of [...] and crosses of all kindes, taken out of the number of the first beasts name.
THese visible marks, whatsoeuer they be, haue fiue notes or tokens, assigned by the text to knowe them by. First they are called the marks of the Beast, Reuel. 13.17. and 14.9. that is to say, marks of the first and great Romane beast, as is proued by 27. Proposition. Secondly, and more especially, they ar called marks of that Beasts name. Reu. 14.11. Thirdly, & most especially of all, they are called the marks of the number of that beasts name, in these words, Reuel. 15.2. And these who obtained victorie of the beaste, and of his Image, and of his marke [Page 55] of the number of his name, worde by word out of the originall greek: And so this victorie is not spoken of his mark, (and) of the number of his name, as some translats, but of his mark of the nūber of his name; meaning so expreslie, that his mark, is a marke of the number of his name: that is to say, is deriued or composed of the number of his name, but the greeke number of his name is, [...], as expreslie saith the text, Reuel. 13.18. Therfore, in these numeral letters [...], ar these marks contained, and this wee haue very specially for the third token. Fourthly, these markes must be deuised, injoyned, and appointed: by the second Beast or Antichrist, as prooues the text, Reuel. 13.16. Fiftly, these marks must be vniuersall vpon all men, rich and poore, free and bound, and that no man might vse his traffike of marchandice or lawful affaires, who had not receiued these marks, as testifies the text. Reuel. 13. 16. & 17. Then, vnto whatsoeuer marks all these fiue tokens do agree, the same are the Antichristian markes: But vnto the abused characters of [...], and crosses of al kinds, doth all these fiue tokens agree: for first [...] is justly called the marke of the first Beast and Roman Empyre, for two causes; the one for that all these of that Empyre, are entised vnder colour of the name of Christ, to reverence that character, being neuerthelesse, as it is abused, nearer to the name of the Antichristian and Latin kingdome, nor to the name of Christ, as hereafter shall be said. The other cause is, for that these marks of [...] are gathered of these letters [...], which are the number of the name of that Latin kingdome and Romane Beast (as hereafter more specially shal be prooued) Therfore, justly ar the marks of [...], called the marks ofthe first Romane Beast, agreeing with the first token. Secondly, and agreeable with the former, because (by the 29. propositiō) that beasts name is [...], whose numeral letters [...], represents and yeelds the marks of [...] (as more specially immediatly shal be said.) Therefore [...] agreeth with the second token, to bee called the mark of that Beasts name. Thirdly, and according to the third token, this mark [...] is contained vnder the numerall letters of that beasts name [...], and is hereby perfitly represented, the two extreme letters respectiuely agreeing in one, [Page 56] and the smal disagreance of the middlemost: to wit, betwixt ξ and ρ̄ to be vpon very necessitie: for where as S. Iohn here speakes expreslie of numerall letters, he could haue no one numeral letter to represent both ρ and his crowne, this way ρ̄, more like it nor ξ, whereof the vpper parte represents the Crown, the nether part the figure of ρ. Moreouer there is yet greter affinitie betwixt [...] & ρ, for ρ or rather ρ after this form fn the greek, & ξ in this Beasts language & cōmon writtē letter in Latin is ρ, which is al one in figure, & so the marks of [...] agrees with the third tokē. Then fourthlie the mark [...] is deuised, & takē vp by the secōd Beast the Pope & his Clergie, to represent as they say, the name Christ thereby, but rather the contrary, as followeth hereafter. Fiftly, and according to the fift token, the Pope and his Clergie ordains vniversallie all theirs, (whome only they cal Christians) to reverence the verie naked figure of [...] and bare character thereof, as hauing a divine vertue in it, transferring and distracting our zealous reverence from Iesus Christ our Saviour, who is God with vs, to such bare characters, & to such dead and naked wordes in an vnknown language, as IHS ✚ Xp̄s ✚ SOTER ✚ IMMANVEL ✚: And therfore appoint they all men to beare and weare this foresaid character [...], with such like other bare names, in their rings, amulets, pēdaries, breastplates, tablets, Principios and Agnus Deis: Abusing it in way of sorcerie, as in a thousnd papisticall charms and conjurations, not onely in the Clergies priuie bookes, but also in their publike service, called Exorcismus, is to be seene. So then, seeing these fiue tokens do agree with [...], it followeth necessarily, that that abused character is one of the Antichristian marks. It remaineth then to proue the like concerning their crosses of al kinds. And first, the crosse is justly called the mark of the first greate Romane beast & Latin Emperours, for three causes, the one because that the Emperour and all his subjects generally, ar some times marked therewith, & bears the same, as shall be said. The other cause, because the Emperour Constantine illuded by a crosse shadowe in the clouds, taketh vp at the deuis & perswasion of Sylvester the first, and first Antichristian Pope, the marke of the crosse, and that the [Page 57] rather, because (as these fabulous histories report) his mother Helena was said to haue found Christs crosse, & so justly may the crosse be called the mark of the first Beaste and Romane Emperour. The last cause, why the crosse is called the mark of the Romane Beast, or Latin Emperour is, for that it is taken out of his name, even out of the three numerall letters thereof, as presently you shall heare. So then the first token of the Antichristian mark, agrees with the crosse. Then agreeable to the second token: forsomuch as by the 27. proposition [...] is that Beasts name, at the least vndoubtedly, the numeral letters of his name are [...], out of the which are gathered crosses of al kinds (as immediatly shal be said.) Therefore these crosses, are justly called the markes of this Beasts name. Then thirdly, according to the third token, in the said numerall letters [...], ar contained crosses of diuers kindes, both in figure and in name: In such manner, as both the Greeke Churches and Latine Churches, are certified thereof: for among the Grecians the forme of χ is a crosse, and among the Latins ξ which is X, is also a crosse, and these bee crosses asidewaies called S. Andrewes crosse: Therefore the third and last letter is a double letter of abbreuiation, containing these two letters ς. τ. wherof the last is called a headles crosse, likest to the crosse, which they cal our Lords crosse: And so alwaies and of euery letter hereof ariseth the figure of the crosse. As to the names of the crosse, in latine crux, & in greeke [...], it is not possible for them to be expressed vnder so fewe letters more viuely, nor they are here, for here haue you their cheif letters, even both their capital & their final: for by χ and ξ, haue you in Latine C. & X. making crux, or. C H. and X making barbarouslie CHRVX, as I haue seene & heard it so in print & pronounced. And againe by the last letter [...] haue yee the greeke name of the crosse [...] likewise expressed, by his capitall and final letters. So then according vnto the thirde token in [...], which ar the greek nūber or numeral letters of the beasts name, are contained crosses of diuers kindes, both by figure and by name evidently expressed, to both the orientall or greeke Churches, and to the occidentall or latine Churches, & what [Page 58] is more evident? Fourthly, and agreeing to the fourth token, these crosses (I meane the abuses thereof) were deuised by the second Beast, the Pope and his Clergie, as magical marks of sorcerie, gree by gree, to withdraw that godly meditation that we ought to haue of Christs passion, and that reuerēce that wee ought to haue towardes Christ, for suffering death for our sakes, and to bestowe the whole merite, honour and vertue thereof, first, to the material crosse, whereon he suffered, and then to bare figures and marks therof, and last of al, to other curious sophistical figures and marks, such as [...] which they cal the crosse of Ierusalem, and such as this crosse [...] which is to be seen vpō diuers old Church walles. Which figures are so degenerat gree by gree frō crosses to cōpasses, crooks & rammald, that altogether they haue no resēblance of Christs passiō. Finally, and according to the fift & last token: these crosss were so vniuersally vsed, that (beside their daylie crossings with their right hande on their fore-heads, which they cal saning) all manner of persones, behooued to beare and weare, euen visible markes thereof, at appointed times on their forheads, or in their hands; such as to be crossed with ashes on their forheads on Ashwednesday, and to bear Palme crosses in their hād on Palmsunday, otherwise they wer thought to be Hereticks, and cursed from the communion of Christians: And these excommunicates (as saith the Bull of Pope Martin the fift, Fol. 134) shal not be permitted to keep houses or lodging, or to make any block or bargain, or to occupie any traffike or trade of marchandize, or to haue any societie with Christians. Then, seeing these crosses agree now with all these fiue tokens of the Antichristian marke, as a litle before [...], was prooued to do. Therefore, necessarilie these markes of [...] and crosses of al kindes, must bee the beasts visible marks. Let no man grudg hereat nor grieuously tak it, objecting, that we haue made these to be the marks of the Antichrist, which men haue hitherto deuised (as they say) to represent the name of Christ, and his passion. For certainlie these same thinges, which not men, but God hath deuised and appointed; how soone they are misused, they ar called by the Spirit of God, abhominations. Appointed not [Page 59] God the brasen Serpent to be erected, as healthful, but after that it was worshipped, it was destroied by4. Reg. 18.4. Ezechias as damnable? Appointed not God the Sacrifices and incense offerings, & yet saith he in Osee, Osee. 6.7. Misericordiā volui & non sacrificium: I desired mercy & not Sacrifice: And in Esay, Ne afferat is vltrà sacrificium frustrà: incensum abhominatio est mihi: Esa. 1.13. Bring no more Sacrifice in vaine: Incense is an abhomination vnto me? Seeing the Lord then doth reject those ordinances which himselfe hath instituted, & calleth thē Abhomination, when they are abused, how much more ought we to reject these sophisticall marks of [...] & crosses of all kindes; such as these † which they cal our Lords crosse, & ✚ S. Georges crosse, & X, S. Andrews crosse, & [...] the crosse of Ierusalem, & [...] the Crosse of Dedication, besides the Popes Crosse, and manie Crosses moe, & esteeme thē as abhominable Antichristian badges, wheras we see thē not onelie deuised by men, but also abused by them in way of sorcerie and magicke: imputing vnto these naked figures, a vertue & sanctitude in their charmes & exorcisms, as thogh, the whol vertue of Christ & his passion, wer transferred ouer into thē. And althogh they say, that they haue deuised [...], to represent the name of Christ [...] therby, & crosses of sundry kinds, to represent his passion therwith: yet the Spirit of God lets vs see euidently by this text, that he doeth reject & cast ouer these their magicall characters & sorceries to themselues againe, as liker to the numeral letters of their name, thā to his name, euē liker to [...]; than to [...] and so let none doubt, but these foresaide figures, as they are vsed, or rather abused, are the verie markes and tokens of the Beaste, agreeing with the foresaide tokens of the text, in all pointes and properties.
32 PROPOSITION. Gog is the Pope, and Magog is the Turkes and Mahometanes.
THis is prooued three waies, to wit, first by the signification of the names, secondlie, by comparison; and thirdlie, [Page 60] by their linage: As to the first, Gog doeth signifie Tectum; Chron. lib. 1 fol. 21 that is to say, Couered: and Magog (as Carion doeth testifie) signifieth De Gog, or Detectum, that is to say, Discouered, as many learned do affirme, thought others esteeme it rather to mean detecto, of a covering, nor detcctum, discouered. So then, there being in these latter daies onlie two great notable and mightie enemies to God: the one the Pope, a couered enemie & a dissembling Christian: the other the Turks and Mahumetans discouered and open professed enemies: It must needs be, that that secreet enemy Gog, is the Pope, & the open enemie Magog, is the Mahometans. As to the second like as by comparison, Gog was an Israelite borne, the Israelites thē being the Church of God.1, Chro. 5, 4 Gen. 10.2 And as Magog was a borne Ethnike: so is the Pope borne among Christians, which nowe are Gods Church: And the Turks and Mahumetans are born Ethnikes. Genes, 49, 4 And againe, as Gog was of the tribe of Reuben, who was accursed for incestuous whoordome. So is the Pope chiefe of that Romish seate, which is called that spirituall whoore and accursed Idolatresse,Apoc, 17, 2 with whō, the Princes of the earth haue committed Idolatrie and spirituall whoordome. As to the third concerning their linage: Ezechiel defines Gog to be the chiefe Prince of Tubal and Meshech: Ezech, 38 and 39 then read Ierome de interpretatione nominum &c. vpon Italia and Tubal, and ye shall find of Tubal to be descended, Iberi or Iberes, which hee cals the Spaniards or Italians in Europe, and likewise of Meshech to be descended the Cappadocians in littell Asia: which all hauing embraced the Christian faith, doth accept the Pope as their supreame head or chief prince: And so Gog, the chiefe prince of Tubal and Meshech, must be the Pope, seeing he is supream head of these Tubalists in Europe, & Meshechists in Asia. And as cōcerning Magog, [...]en. 10, 2 he was the son of Iaphet. Of this Magog descended the whole Scythians which nowe ar the Turks and Mahumetans, according to the opinion of all writers. Then by these three reasons (by and besides the whole notes and tokens of the 20. cap. contained in the principall treatise) it appeareth evidently that Gog is the Pope, and Magog the Turk or Mahumetike Emperour,
33 PROPOSITION. The armies of Gog and Magog (cap. 20) are all one with the armies of the sixt Trumpet and sixt Viall.
THis is sufficientlie prooued, by the harmonie of the whole tokens assigned by the Text of the Trumpets and Ʋialles, and by the text of Gog and Magog Apoc. 20.. For these of the sixt Trumpet and Ʋial, dwelt beyond & about Euphrates, and wer kings of the East: so here doth Magog, for that he is proued latelie, to meane the Mahometanes. They are there called in the sixt Trumpet foure, as indeed they are foure families, and foure nations Mahometanes: Here likewise, are they termed the people of the foure quarters or corners of their land. There were these foure nations bound at Euphrates till their due time, and then loosed to mak war-fare: Here is the Deuill bounde from stirring them vp or entising them, till their due time, and then is loosed to stir them vp to battell. There are these Mahometanes alone reckoned, to two hundred thousand thousandes of horsemen: Here are both the Armies, euen both Gog and Magog, compared to the sea sand in number. There, doeth three diuelish inspirations (called spirits of Deuils) gather and stir vp all those people to battell: Here, the deuill himselfe is loosed to stirre them vp to battell. There, doe they convene to fight in Armageddon, Hier. de int. nominum. which is the mountaine of the Euangell, and landes of the Elect and chosen people: Here, doe they compasse the whole lands, companie, and armie of Christians, and their elect cities. And finallie, these foure of that sixt Trumpet or Viall, are prooued by the fourth proposition, to bee the foure nations Mahometanes. The same is this Magog, prooued to be by the former proposition. And consequentlie, the armies or Gog and Magog, whome Sathan here in this 20. cap. doeth stirre vp to warre-fare, are the selfe same armies of Papistes and Mahometanes, that made greate warres in the daies of the sixt Trumpet or Viall.
34 PROPOSITION. The thousand yeares that Sathan was bound (Reuel. 20.) began in Anno Christi 300. or thereabout.
FOr proofe hereof, it is euidēt by histories, that after the cōtinual and successiue tyrannie of Ethnick Emperours, and last of Diocletian, (who in one moneth made seuenteene thousand Martyrs) there arose about this 300. year of Christ, Constantine the greate, a Christian and baptized Emperour, who, and whose successors (except a few of short raign) maintained Christianisme and true religion, to the abolishing of Sathans publique kingdome: and therefore, say wee, this yeare Sathan is bound. Secondlie, shortlie after this time, was the first publike and generall godlie counsell, holden by the Christians at Nice, in the which the Apostolicall beleefe was published, the authentik Scriptures authorized: and finallie, the true Christian religion so receiued, that all Sathans outwarde opposition was banished, and his publique tyrannie and kingdome ouercome: although yet, by his Lieutenaunt the Antichriste, euen then began his dissimulate and hypocriticall kingdome. Thirdlie, seeing by the former proposition, Gog and Magog are the armies of the sixt trumpet and Viall: and these (by the fourth proposition) were loosed about the yeare of God 1296. to make warres. Therefore, about the yeare of God 1296. or rather (as histories preciselie report) about the yeare of God 1300; were the armies of Gog and Magog loosed, and so Sathan was then loosed, to stirre them vp to battell: from the which 1300. yeares deduce the thousand years, that Sathan lay bound, and it will consequentlie followe, that Sathan was first bound in Anno Christi 300. Fourthlie, and for confirmation of the former, theApoc. 20.7. text saith, that howe soone the Deuill is loosed, he passeth foorth to stirre vp and seduce, these Papistical and Mahometicke armies of Gog and Magog, to strife and warre-fare. But in that 1300, yeare, began (by Sathans instigation) that proude strife betwixt them for supremacie, both of them chalenging to themselues the Empire of the whole earth: for Pope Boniface the eight, instituted the first Iubelee, that [Page 63] yeare, and clothed himselfe the one day in the Pontificals of a Bishop, and the other day in the robe-royall, of an Emperour, and hauing borne before him two swords, proclaimed these words, Ecce duo gladii hîc: meaning thereby, that he was ful Monarch, and more than Monarch: For; thereby he vsurped to himselfe vniuersallie both spirituall and temporall power. Likewise, on the contrarie parte, that same yeare, the whol nations Mahometans crowned Ottoman the great, their first Emperor: And so betwixt these contrarie Empires, euer from thenceforth followed out such vniuersall and terrible warres, that the Deuil (doubtles) from that 1300. yeare of God forth, ran loose among them, stirring vp these warres, and consequentlie, he lying bound 1000. yeares afore, behoued to begin that bondage, in Anno 300.
35 PROPOSITION. The Deuils bondage a thousand yeares (cap. 20) is no waies els, but from stirring vp of vniuersall warres among the nations.
SOme by this bondage of Sathan, haue sought out to find the visible Church of God a thousande yeares pure and vncorrupt, or beleeued that the true Church shoulde enjoy 1000 years peace: But the plain contrary appeareth here by the fourth & fift verses, where it is meant expresly, that in the time of these 1000. yeares, should the Antichristian beast raign, and shuld slay and behead those, that worshipped not him, nor reverenced his mark & image, but liued & raigned with Christ Iesus, as true Christians, all these 1000. yeares: and that all the reste of the people lay deade in his errours; & rose not therefrom, til these thousand years were expired. And so, seeing both by this text, these Antichristiā Ethnicks raigned in this time, as also by the chap. 11.2. they possessed the outward visible Church: Therfore, could neither the true invisible church injoy peace vnder the Antichrist, neither yet could that visible Church be pure & incorrupt, during these thousand years, but rather after the said 1000. years, because it is meant (vers. 5,) that the rest, who were dead in Antichristian [Page 64] errours shoulde not reuiue, or rise there-from, till after these thousand years. And beside this, it is not said, that the Deuil is bound from troubling the Church of God (which euer he troubleth) but from seducing or deceiuing the Gentiles or Nations; which for the most parte, are taken in the Scriptures in an euill part, for the idolatrous, wicked, & leud people of the worlde, to whome God here granteth these thousand yeares peace; because they (Reuel. 11.2) do possesse the outward and visible Church, and haue the true invisible Church lurking vnder their feete, which by their continuall trouble might also bee troubled. Then resteth the affirmatiue parte of this proposition, to wit, this bondage of Sathan to bee from stirring vp of these Nations, to anie vniuersall warre-fare, while the end of these thousand years. For proofe whereof, when he was loosed, then (saith the text) he passed foorth to stir vp the whole nations, of the foure quarters of the land of Gog & Magog, to war-fare & vniversal bloodshed: whereas contrarilie, by histories it is found, that all the 1000 yeares praeceeding, there were no such huge imperial armies nor terrible bloodshed as nowe, when the whole Papistes & pretended Christians on the one side, against the whole Mahometanes on the other side, euen the whole Occident against the whole Orient, vnder the names of Gog and Magog, were conuened in number as the sand of the sea, as the text saith. So that in comparison hereof, all small ciuill warres, skirmishings and incursions, that occurred during those thousand yeares, were thought nothing but peace; and consequentlie, those terrible and vniversall warres, that fell out from this time forth, were the onlie troubles and seditions, from entising and raising whereof, the text meaneth, that Sathan was boūd & restrained al the former 1000 years, & not from stirring vp of errors, heresies, martyrdom, & provincial warfare.
36. PROPOSITION. The 1260. years of the Antichrists vniuersal raign ouer Christians, begins about the year of Christ 300. or 316. at the farthest.
THis is proued, by reasons of Gods apparant mercie, and of the Deuils subtiltie, and by diuers necessarie reasons [Page 65] of Scripture confirmed by histories. And first, seeing on the one part, it was meete for the iniquities of the world, that sometime a generall Antichrist shuld come: but on the other part, whilest as Sathan ranne at libertie, and his kingdome, publikely florished by the tyrannie of Ethnik Emperours, by whome Gods Church was extreemely persecuted: It was vnmeete at that time, that the Antichrist shuld also rise: lest on both sides, Gods Church were vtterly extinguished: and therefore it is not apparent, that God in his mercie woulde suffer the Antichristian kingdome to rise, vntil the empyre of Ethnike Emperours were first remoued, and Christian Emperours established in their place; and so Satans publike tyrannie bound and restrained. But this came to passe, in Anno. 300. that the first race of Christian baptized Emperours, is begun in Constantine the greate; and Satans publik and imperiall tyrannie suppressed: Therfore, at this time it is most apparant, that God in the temperature of his justice and mercie, would rathest set vp the Antichrists kingdome; and herewith agreeth the saying of Paul, that he that holds, 2 Thess [...] must hold stil a while, till he be taken out of the vvay or remooued, and then must that man of sinne or Antichrist come; meaning, the wicked Emperours that held the empyre, must holde still the same till they be remooued, and then shoulde the Antichrist start vp: and so the one enemie of God to giue place to the other, & not both to stande. Secondly, by the Deuils craft and subtiltie (herein permitted by God) it is very apparant, that whil as his publik tyranny, that he vsed by his Ethnik Emperours, was new lie extinguished, and himselfe in a maner, to be bound and restrained for 1000. yeares; hee would in this his bondage from publike tyrannie, rather establish the Antichrist, as his Lieftennant, to vse dissimulate tyrannie, rather thā at any other time: but this his bondage and Christianisme of Emperors, beganne about this 300. yeare, by the 34. propositiō: Therfore, about this 300. year, it appears rathest that the deuil by his subtilty, hath substituted the Antichrist and made him to begin his kingdome. Thirdly, these 1260 yeares of the Antichrists raigne, or three great daies and an halfe, that the witnesses or testaments of God lyeth deade [Page 66] (which by the 15. proposition are al one date) being ended then (saith the text) Shall the tenth part of the Antichristian citie fall, Ap. 11.13. euen the tenth part of all the Abbacies, Monasteries, Nunries, and Papistical policies be destroyed. But so it came to passe, that neere about the year of God 1560 these papistical pollicies, were destroyed in England, Scotland, and in some partes of Germanie, Fraunce & other cuntries, euen their large tenth part, from the which 1560 yeare, deduce 1260 for the years of the Antichrists vniuersall reigne, so rests 300. yeares to be the year of Christ, about the which the Antichrist began his kingdome.2 Thess 2 7, 7 Fourthlie, Paul testifieth, that those that hold, must hold still a while till their seate be transported, deuided, or remooued out of the way, and then shall the Antichrist reueale and open vp his empire, for he shal sit in their seat, ouer the Church of God, extolling himselfe as God. &c. And so it came to passe, that the Romane Emperours sate that time, and held the empyre of Rome, till Constantine, Emperour thereof, transported the seate of the empyre to Bizanrium, which he called Constantinople, leauing the seate of Rome to Pope Sylvester the first and his successours, who was the first Pope or Bishoppe that reigned in Rome vnmartyred, and the first that euer possessed patrimonie, rent or dignitie, from which time, their kingdome euer hath increased vntill our daies; and therefore, justlie about his time, which beganne in the yeare of God 313. or thereby, establishe wee the beginning of the Antichristian and Papisticall reigne. Fiftly, because it is saide byDan. 7.25. Daniel and by theApo. 13.5. Revelation, that hee must all the saide space, haue power and authoritie ouer the Sanctes of God, and by Paule in the saide text, that hee must be extolled against all that is called God. Therefore must wee begin our compt, at the time of the Popes first power and authoritie, euen his very first coronation and this was about the yeare of God 316. or thereby: for then Constantine Emperour, gaue to the saide Pope Sylvester the towne of Rome, and greate landes and dominions thereabout, and gaue vnto him the triple Crowne, to bee crowned therewith, in token that hee made him supreame head ouer al the Churches in Asia, Africa & Europ; as his gift, cōteined in the decrees, Distinct. 96, at lēgth [Page 67] proportes, the date whereof is, Data Romae. 3. Calend. April. à Constantino Augusto quartò consule, & Gallicano quartò consule, which date repugneth in it self, for we find by cōmon writers that Constantin his fourth cōsulship, & Licinius his fourth consulship, wer together in anno Christi 315. or according to Haloander in anno 316. But we find never, where Constantine and Gallicanus were consulles together, neither yet that Gallicanus was four times Consull: Whereby, not onely the date of this gift is vncertain, what yeare of God it befel, but also, by this repugnance, and diuers other reasons, some thinks this whol gift to be false & fained, yet alwaies in this purpose be it true or false, it is al one matter: for seeing they acclaime it as true, and thereat makes their beginning: it pertaineth not to vs to reason here, whether their beginning was trulie giuen, or falslie vsurped, but to make the beginning of our compt, where they begin their kingdome: to wit, at the saide gift, falling betwixt the years of God 300. and 316. whereas the precise yeare thereof, is (as is said) vncertaine. Sixtly, by Platina the Popes familiar, in vita Syluestri primi, and by diuers others of their owne histories, it is reported, that the time that this foresaid Sylvester the first, receiued from Constantine (or otherwise vsurped) this foresaide large authoritie and rent, there was a voice heard from heauen crying, Nowe is poyson sowen in the Church of God, which miraculous voice, apparantlie establisheth & maketh plain to vs, that at this time began the horrible and detestable kingdome of the Antichrist, as a poysonable venome vnto the Church of God. Seuenthly, at this time began the first Antichristian mark, proued be the 31. proposition to be the abused marke of the crosse, which now was induced among Christiās, by the fabulous allegāce of two fained miracles: the one that Queen Helen the Mother of Constantine, admonished by an heauenly vision past, and did finde that very reall crosse whereon our Lord suffered: the other that Constantine her sonne, fighting against Maxentius, saw appear in the aire the figure of a crosse with these words, In hoc signo vinces, by this mark thou shalt ouercome, with which mark and inscription, the Portugal ducat & some other coines of late are imprinted. And therefore [Page 68] here, where the first publike and visible Antichristian marke beginnes, esteeme we justly the Antichristian kingdome to begin. Eightly, about this time, even anno Christi 312. the 24. of September, at which time the saide Emperour Constantine overcame Maxentius, and was also the first year of Pope Syluester the first, and first Pope vnmartyred, euen that very daye and yeare, beginneth the common account of the papisticall kingdome, by Indictions in place of the olde Olympiads; and therfore,Ottoman. Iose. Scal. de emen. temporū. are called Indictio Constantinianae Pontificiae: Of these, the first yeare falleth betwixt the said year of Christ 312. the 24. of September, and the 24. of September, In anno 313. and so proceedeth for 15. yeares, and then beginneth againe the first yeare of a newe Indiction; keeping thereby, the exact memorie of the current yeares of their kingdom, within every fiftene, and dating therewith all their papisticall evidences, even like the Iewes, who keeped compt of the od and currēt yeares of their Iubilees, from their conquest of the land of Canaan: The number of whol Indictions, and of whole Iubilees, being more easie to keep account off, nor their current yeares. Therefore, justlie at this firste yeare of the first Indiction and account of their kingdom, euen betwixt the yeare of Christ 312. the 24. of September, and 313. the 24. of September, which yeare also the said Sylvester began, ought wee justly to begin the Antichristian kingdome. So by these eight former reasons, we conclude, that betwixt the yeare of Christ 300, and 316, hath the Antichristian and Papisticall raign begun, reigning vniuersallie and without any debatable contradiction 1260. yeares; and so (as is said) about the yeare of God 1560. began their first publike decay, and the open repining against their kingdom to their confusiō, ever more & more; till firste their rents: then their citie of Rome: last of all, by Christs owne comming, their latter dregs, be vtterly extinguished and exterminate, as in the principall treatise, vpon the 17. and 18. Chapters shalbe declared.
So ends this demonstratiue resolution of all difficulties of the Reuelation, first of all dates and times, and last of the principall termes and matters, as to the meaner termes and smaller matters, they are interpreted in the notes of the principall treatise.
CONCLVSION.
THen for conclusion, by these interpretatiue propositions, followeth foure thinges maruelous and notable. First, that the interpretation of every parte of the Reuelation, is accessorie or consectarie to other: that is to say, it is so chained and linked together, that every mysterie opens other to the discouerie of the whole. Secondly, that the first halfe of the book is orderly, that is to say, it containeth in order of time the most notable accidents that concerneth Gods Church, from the time of Christs Baptisme successiuely to the latter day. Thirdly, that euery historie prophecied, is limited or dated with his own nūber of years. Fourthly and last of all, that whatsoeuer historie is more orderlie and summarlie, than plainly set downe in the first orderlie parte of the booke, the same is repeated, interpreted, or amplified in the last part of the booke: which therefore wee call the amplificatiue parte of the booke, deuiding the whole Revelation according to the table following, before we proceed to the principall matter.
Historical application. 1 First Christ in his compleat age of 29. yeares is baptized, beginnes to open and preach the Gospel. In these seuen years Matthew writes his Hebrue Evangell, and publisheth it.
Yeares of Christ. 29 Sabboth year The weeke of the first Seale.
Paraphrase. 1 THerafter I saw when Christe opened the sealed doctrine of our redemptiō, in this first sealed week. One a of the four Euangelists in the mightie stile of Gods thundring Spirite set out the same, willing vs to approch & cōsider it
The Text. 1 AFter, I beheld whē the Lambe had opened one of the seals, and I heard one of the foure beastes say, as it vvere the noise of thunder, Come and see.
Historical application. 2 Christ & his Disciples passe ouer al the world, bearing the testimony of the gospel, and true word of God; which by Christes doctrine, miracles, death, and glorious victorie ouer death, so touched and mooued the harts of all the faithfull, that sodainlie it spread, encreased, and triumphantlie it got victory ouer all the world.
Paraphrase. 2 And as wee beheld and considered that Evangel, lo, the b pure and holy teachers and Apostles, speedily went forth, ouer all the worlde, bearing with them Gods word, shoting the arrowes of zeale to pierce all godlie hearts: & this word of God was crowned with victory, for it passed ouer all the world, ouercōming and conquering.
The Text. 2 Therefore, I behelde, and loe, ther vvas a white horse, & he that sate on him, had a bowe, and a crowne was giuen vnto him, & he went foorth conquering that hee might ouercome.
Historical application. 3 Nowe after this firste seed of the Evangell once sowen, beginneth persecution, about the six and thirtieth yeare of Christes age. Within these seconde seuen yeares Marke writeth the second Euangel; in comforte of the afflicted Church.
Yeares of Christ. 36 A sabbaoth or year of rest The weeke of the second Seale.
Paraphrase. 3 And as Christ by his Apostles, opened the doctrine of our redemption, in the second sealed week, the second Euangelist spak out his gospel, that al mē might come and see it.
The Text. 3 And when hee had opened the second seale, I hearde the second beaste say, Come and see.
Historical application. 4 And Saint Steuen suffered martyrdome for Christes sake, and Iames the brother of Iohn, likewise was beheaded (Act. chap. 7. and chap 12.) for euen then, and from thence foorth, the Roman magistrates, and Synagogue of the Iewes neuer stinted from persecuting and putting to death by fire and sworde, all true Christians.
Paraphrase. 4 And that time proceeded c tyrannous & bloody Magistrats; sitting in the seat of tyrannie, to whō power was giuē to persecut Gods Saints on earth, and to depriue them of peace, by causing all men to kill thē, abusing so the sworde of justice, that God had giuen them.
The Text. 4 And there went out another horse, that vvas red, and power was giuen to him that sate thereon, to take peace from the earth, and that they shoulde kill one another, & there was giuen vnto him a great sword.
Historical application. 5 Notwithstanding this persecution, the Euangel ever more and more, is opened & encreased, so that within these third seuen years beginning in the yeare of Christ, 43. Luke also wrote the third Evāgel & published it. At this time there fell a greate famine vniuersallie,
Yeares of Christ. 43 A sabbaoth The weeke of the third Seale.
Paraphrase. 5 And while as the third sealed week (after Christ began to open his doctrine,) came, the d thirde Evāgelist wrote forth his Euangel, that all men might come & see the same: thē beholde, there came a deadly plague of famine, & therewith such skarsitie, that victuals wer weighed by weight.
The Text. 5 And when he had opened the third seal, I hard the third beaste say, Come and see. Then I behelde, and loe, a black horse, & hee that sate on him, had ballances in his hand.
Historical application. 6 Wherof Agabus prophecied, & foretold to the Euangelists & Disciples, & whol Church (Act. 11) and they contributed among them, & gaue succor to their poore brethren: in this dearth, the bushell of wheat was sold for fiue accustomed prices, and the bushel of barley for three: Of this dearth sheweth Suetonius and Dion, and other: but of the skarsity of other victualles we read not.
Paraphrase. 6 So that it was forespoken of, and came to passe amōg the midds of the Evangelistes and Disciples of the primitiue Church, that the mesure of wheat was sold for no lesse than fiue ordinarie prices, and the measure of barley for three ordinarie prices, but there was no skarsitie of wine nor oyle.
The Text. 6 And I heard a voice in the middes of the foure beasts say, A measure of wheat for a pennie, and three measures of barley for a penny, and oyle, and wine hurt thou not.
Historical application. 7 Then, after the 50. yeare of Christ, in this fourth seuen yeares, S. Iohn wrote the fourth Euangel, and published it, beginning at the description of Christs Diuinitie,
Yeares of Christ. 50 AsabbaothThe weeke of the fourth Seale
Paraphrase. 7 And when the fourth sealed weeke (after Christ first opened his doctrin) cam: the fourth Evangelist shewed forth his Evā gel, that al mē might come and see it.
The Text. 7 And when hee had opened the fourth seale, I hard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
Historical application. 8 Expreslie against certaine Heretiks, for there arose manie in those daies, as Cerinthus, Nicolaus, and Ebion, and (in the Acts chapt. 13. and chap. 15.) Elymas the sorcerer, and certaine Pharisaicall heretikes, and others, procuring GOD his plagues against Iudaea, and other partes of Asia, where they resorted.
Paraphrase. 8 And beholde, at that time cam in e heresies among the people, bringing therewith the death of the soule, and procuring hel and aeternal damnation: and through that quarter of the earth, wher these heresies raigned, God gaue thē ouer to the sworde, to famine, to death, and to the f tyrants of the world.
The Text. 8 And I looked & behold, a pale hors, & his name that sate on him was Death, and Hel followed after him, and power was giuē vnto thē ouer the fourth parte of the earth, to kill with the sworde, and with hunger and with death, & with the bests of the earth.
Historical application. 9 Then in the fift seuen yeares, euen the yeare of Christ 57 arose the tyrant Nero, on whome, and on whose bloodie seate, and successours, the blood of Saint Steuee and Saint Iames, martyred by his predecessours, and other Saintes martyred by himself,
Paraphrase. 9 And when the fift sealed weeke (after Christ firste opened his word) came, then (some newe tyrāt being risen) there appeared prostrate before the ff justice seat of God, the souls of them that had bin martyred for the worde of God, and for the testimonie of Christ Iesus, which they did beare.
The Text. 9 And whē he had opened the fift seal, I saw vnder the altar the soules of them, that were killed for the worde of God, and for the testimony which they maintained.
Historical application. 10 Cried vp to the heauens to God, to revenge their blood, vppon these tyrant Emperors of this bloody [Page 110] [...] [Page 111] [...] Empire, but as God is euer holie and just,
Yeares of Christ. 57 A sabbaoth The weeke of the fift Seale
Paraphrase. 10 Crying vehemētly to God, holie and true, to judge and reuēge their blood, on these that had shead the same vpon the earth.
The Text. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, Lord, holie and true, doest not thou judge and auenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth.
Historical application. 11 So within a short space after this, euen whē Peter and Paule, & othere of gods seruāts had likewise suffered martytdom vnder the same tyrant Nero, then poured out GOD his greate vengeance on him, his seate, familie, and successours, as followeth,
Paraphrase. 11 These hath God clothed with his g innocencie, and willeth them to abide a litle while, vntil the number of their brethren & fellow seruants that must likwise shortly be martyred for the Evāgel were also fulfilled.
The Text. 11 And long white robes wer giuen vnto euerie one, & it was said vnto them, that they should rest for a little seson, vntil their fellow seruants, and their brethren that shuld be killed, euen as they were, were fulfilled.
Historical application. 12 To wit, after the yeare of Christ, 64. euen in the sixt seuen yeares, a great change and defection came in al estates of the Roman Empire: for, now Nero raised great persecutions against the true spiritual professors, to haue vtterly darkened and extinguished the light of the Gospel, as also, hee became a vile incestuous tyrant and paricide, a polluter of his whole Empire, and estates thereof, with blood and tyrannie,
Yeares of Christ. 64 A sabbaoth The weeke of the sixt Seale.
Paraphrase. 12 And when the sixt sealed weeke after Christ, first opened, his word came, then is the gret empire of the earth shaken, & the Spiritualtie and bright light of the Gospel, darkned with persecution h & secular princes and Magistrates nowe are become bloody butchers.
The Text. 12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixt seal, & loe, there was a gret earthquake, and the sun was as black as sackcloth of haire, and the Moone was like blood.
Historical application. 13 Namelie, of Gods Saints, Peter and Paule & other martyrs, throwen downe without mercie.
Paraphrase. 13 And Gods ministers are yet throwen down as shaken fruite.
The Text. 13 And the starres of heauē fel vnto the erth as a fig-rree casteth her greene figs, when it is shaken of a mightie wind.
Historical application. 14 So that the true Church of God is forced to lurk in secret; for revēge wherof, & of the blood of other martyrs shead by other Emperours before God: mooueth the kingdomes of France, Spain, and Ile Britaine, to revolt from this tyrant.
Paraphrase. 14 And God his Church lurketh, as a closed letter: wher fore, euen now God stirred vp gret kingdomes of k maine landes, and Ilandes to revolt from the the obedience of that Empire.
The Text. 14 And heauē departed away, as a scrolle, whē it is rolled, and euery mountain and yle wer moued out of their places.
Historical application. 15 And these kingdōs with the Princes, Tribunes, Cōsuls, Senators & people of Rome, fled frō his tyranny, and left him & al his race of the Caesars blood,
Paraphrase. 15 And the kings that wer vnder that great Empire of the earth, with the Princes, Tribunes, and members thereof, small and great, free and bond, hid and absented thēselues, among obscure people from their Emperours presence, and fled vnder the protection of newe heads-men, & barbarous nations,
The Text. 15 And the kings of the erth and the greate men, and the rich men, & the chief captaines, and the mightie men, and euerie bond-man, and euery freeman, hid themselues in dennes, and amōg the rocks of the mountaines.
Historical application. 16 And chosed Galba, a stranger, to be their Emperour, against Nero, whereuppon Nero (after hee had burned his town of Rome, murdered his Senators, mother, & chief kinsmen) horribly slayeth himselfe.
Paraphrase. 16 Crauing these Barbares to raigne ouer them, and to couer them frō the horrible tyranny of these Emperours, who represēted the face of Gods wrath & of Christ Iesus.
The Text. 16 And saide to the montains and rockes, Fall on vs, and hide vs from the presence of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lambe.
Historical application. 17 That same yeare the Emperours Galba, Otho, and Vitellius, cruellie murther ech other with manie thousande Romanes, in signe and token of Gods angrie face & vnresistable vē geance.
Paraphrase. 17 For the great day of their wrath, and time of revēge, is come, and none is able to withstand the the same.
The Text. 17 For the gret day of his wrath is come, & who can stand?