The ground of this treatise, we take out of the first booke of Samuel the 10. Chapter the 25. verse, where it is thus written:
IT pleased God in mercy, to choose out of all the nations of the worlde, the people of Israel to be a peculiar people vnto him selfe, on whome he would set his whole affection and poure foorth the full treasures of his blessings, both spirituall, to wit, his couenant and his promises, his word and his Church, his worshippe and his visible presence, yea which is all in all, his owne onely sonne the sauiour of the worlde and with him eternall saluation: and also temporall, as namely continuall deliuerance from all daungers, in Aegypt, [Page 2] in the wildernesse and in the lande of Chanaan: a fruitfull land to dwell in, wise and puisant iudges to gouerne them and to saue them out of the handes of all enemies, from Moyses to Samuel. But this people was an vnfaithfull, that is to say, an vngracious people, and did neither worthely esteeme nor carefully keepe the blessinges bestowed vpon them: but as they were in nature and conditions,Why the people desired an alteration of the state. so they did affect to be in all other respectes like vnto the prophane nations of the earth: and therefore they chaunged both the ciuill and also the ecclesiasticall state appointed by God, insomuch that for the true worship of God they did often take vnto themselues the idolatrie of the heathen, and in steede of the iudges by whome they had beene gouerned now 400. yeares, they would needes haue a king set ouer them as other nations had. The which desire although it were greately displeasing in the eyes of God and of Samuel, yet by the importunitie of the people, it was obtained: insomuch that in steede of the sonnes of Samuel, who gouerned the lande in their fathers age, Saule in sonne of Cis was annointed kinge of Israell. This chaunge of the ciuill magistrate beeing made, it did of necessitie followe, that there shoulde bee a chaunge of the lawes also, by the which the people were gouerned, according to that which is commonly saide, newe Lordes must haue newe lawes. For although they tooke the occasion of this alteration,The occasion of this alteration. at the personal faultes of the sonnes of Samuel, yet they chaunged not onely the gouernour but also the gouernment it selfe, and brought [Page 3] in an other kinde of gouernment farre different from that which was before in force, and therefore requiring newe lawes, whereupon to stand. Yea the processe of this treatise will in part declare, that the difference betwixt these two gouernmentes, the one of the Iudges and the other of the Kinges was so great that the lawes of the one estate coulde no more agree to the other, then the furniture of a mightie gyant will serue a childe or the base apparrell of a meane man, beseeme a statelie prince. In consideration whereof Samuell or rather GOD by the ministerie of Samuell, as hee had giuen to the people a king, so in the next place hee giueth vnto them the state of a kingdome, and that by establishing those orders and lawes according to the which both the king shoulde rule and the people obey. Not that hee did prescribe vnto them any newe iudiciall lawes, but onely he made the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome, the which are heere called the iudgement of the kingdome, that is, the verie nature, condition and manner of this newe gouernment, the proper lawes of it, and as it were, the verie markes by the which it may bee iudged, that is, knowen in it self, and distinguished from all other kindes of gouernment. For so the word heere vsed doth signifie in manie places of the scripture, as namely, 2. Kinges. 1.7. where Achasia asketh his messengers, what is the iudgemente of the man, whome they saide to be Elias, that is, what was his behauiour, his apparrell, his countenaunce, and as we doe vsually say, what [Page 4] manner of man is hee: so heere the iudgement of the kingdome is to be vnderstood. Likewise by the face of GOD heere is meant the place of the presence of God, to witte the tabernacle wherein God was worshipped, or more specially the Arke with the propitiatorie, which was a visible signe of the presence of God. Thus much of the occasion, and meaning of these wordes, which wee may handle in this order; That first we speake of that which is heere called the iudgement of the kingdome which is the doctrine of it, and in the seconde place consider the actions of Samuell mentioned in the text: the which are three in number. The first is, that he spake this doctrine of the kingdome to the people, the second, that he wrote it in a booke, the thirde is, that hee laide the booke before the Lorde: of these in order.
Sect. II.
BVt before wee come to the speciall doctrine of this kingdome, it will not be eyther vnprofitable or impertinent if we doe briefly consider the genenerall doctrine of magistracie. The which as it is worthy diligentlie to be handled and commended to the Church of GOD; so it will giue greate lighte to this whole treatise following. Magistracie therefore is not a meere deuise of man, as they who contemne and [Page 5] labour to ouerthrow all authoritie, speaking euil of those things which they know not, haue imagined: but an ordinance of God Rom. 13.12. There is no power but of GOD, he therefore that resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God. But it may be thought that it is not gods ordinance seeing it cannot be shewed that euer it was established by God throughout the worlde,Magistracie Gods ordinance. but rather inuented and continued by men excelling others in strength and in ambition, whereby they were both moued to desire superioritie and also enabled to accomplish their desire, and so haue by violence, bloudshed outrage tyrannie and al manner of impietie against God, and iniustice in regarde of men both gotten and vsurped the places of rulers. So that seeing this hath beene the originall of the authoritie almost of all rulers, we cannot make it the institution of God, especially seeing that it doth not appeare that God did euer commaund that there should be magistrates sette vppe ouer the people throughout the whole worlde, only amongst the Iewes magistracie was sette vp by his commaundement but not in any place beside. Whereunto wee answere, that the abuses of magistracie, although many and grieuous, cannot take away the lawfull vse of it. And further that the cause why there is no expresse commaundement in the word of God enioyning that magistracie should be set vp in all places, is, for that the worde of God doth not belong to the whole world but only to the Church [Page 6] which is in all times, and especially was in the first ages of the worlde, the least part, yea sometimes as nothing in comparison of the huge number of infidels. But in the Church, God hath from time to time both commaunded and established the vse of magistracie and seuerely punished the contempt of it:The church hath neuer beene without magistracie. as might be shewed by examples in all ages. For although there coulde be no publicke magistracie in the Church till the dayes of Moses, because vntill that time the Church was contained within the compasse of one or a fewe families, yet there was priuate gouernement which had no lesse force and authoritie then when the number of the Church encreasing to a whole nation, publike magistracie was erected. For the first borne of the familie was the ruler, and as it were a Lorde to the rest, as Iacob doth call Esau, Genesis. 33.13.14. But although magistracie hath beene by the expresse commaundement of GOD established onely in the Churche, yet it belongeth as much to infidels. For it is instituted by God, not [...]s he is the Sauiour of his Church, but as hee is the creatour and preseruer of all men. Therefore howsoeuer God doth not vouchsafe his loue and eternall life comming thereof to anie of those who are not▪ of his Church, yet as the Apostle witnesseth, Romanes. 3.29. Hee is the GOD not onely of the Iewes, who onely were then his Church, but also of the Gentiles. In this respect as also in regarde of his faithfull people with [Page 7] whome they liue, and for other causes, he doth bestowe vppon them manie temporall blessinges, letting the raine to fall downe and the sunne to shine vppon them, and also in making them partakers of this ordinaunce of magistracie by the which they may liue in order and peace, safely and quietly enioying all the temporall commodities of this presente life. The meanes by the which God doth sette vppe this his ordinaunce amongest infidels, who are destitute of his worde, is the light of nature remayning in the mindes of men,How God erecteth magistracie among infidels. by the which they doe easelie both see the manifolde commodities which come by magistracie and also desire to be made partakers thereof. For although by reason of the corruption of our nature, fewe can liue in due subiection vnto authoritie, with a contented minde, yet almost all men when they are without magistrates, doe of themselues desire to haue some to gouerne, and no maruaile: seeing that the deformitie and inconueniences which the wante of magistrates bringeth, are euidente to all men, for that a people in such a state is like a to bodie without a head to mooue it. The experience heereof wee haue euen in this people of the Iewes who did voluntarilie without anie compulsion desire a king, and that in a most earnest manner. Thus we see that magistracie is the ordinance of God, whereof this doth necessarily insue, that it is not as an vnholie, prophane and impure state, or to be vilely esteemed of, as many doe affirme and account it to be, who doe falsely thinke [Page 8] that the beautie of the Church cannot appeare, neither her authoritie be sufficiently extolled and established, but by deforming and treading vnder foote this diuine ordinance of ciuill magistracie, the which as it is most acceptable to God so it ought to be had in greate honour by all men.Why God appointed magistracie. Lastly the endes why magistracie was [...]ppointed by God are two; The first is the representing of his glory here on earth. The second is the procuring of the good of man. For the first; The magistrate is Gods deputie and vice gerent here on earth to gouerne men and to keepe the world in order without confusion: euen as we see that greate monarches haue many legates and deputies, by whome they rule their seuerall prouinces: and therfore God doth communicate to them as his office so also his name, and calleth them Gods, in the which respect the magistrate is a liuely,In what respect the magistrate beareth the image of God. yea a liuing Image of God; first of his excellencie, in that he is taken from the common sort and condition of men, and set aloft: therefore he is to be honoured. Secondly of the wisdome of God in that he is able to foresee imminent dangers, to make fit lawes and orders, to iudge of right and wrong, and to keepe his people in peace and mutuall concorde, and therefore he is to be reuerenced, and to be obeyed in his lawes and edictes. Thirdly of the iustice of God, in that he doth seuerely punish the greate misdemeanour of malefactors, and therefore he is to be feared. Fourthly of the mercie of God, in that he doth gratiously with fauour passe by and [Page 9] winke at small offences, and therefore he is to be praised. And lastly he carieth the image of the goodnes of God in that by his meanes foreseeing, preuenting and repelling all dangers and troubles, we do inioy all manner of blessings both temporal and eternall euen life and liberty, plentie of all thinges and prosperity, houses and landes, wiues and children, friendes and acquaintance, and that which is much more to be esteemed, the true seruice and worship of God, his holy worde, and in one worde, all thinges needfull in regard eyther of bodie or soule, and therefore the magistrate is vnfainedly to be loued and praised. The second end why magistracie was appointed is the good of man, that by this meanes, they might liue in peace, safety, and order. But of the seuerall commodities, which magistracie bringeth, we doe not purpose to entreat, because they are commonly knowen although more enioyed then considered: as also for that they may in part be gathered of that which hath beene spoken.
Sect. III.
THus we haue by the generall doctrine of magistracie an entrance made to the speciall doctrine of the kingdome of Israell; wherein we haue many seueral points to consider, which for order and memorie sake may be reduced to two heades: whereof the first containeth the state of this kingdom in respect of n [...]en or of the people of Israel, the second, [Page 10] the state of it in respect of God. The first head hath the greatest part of the difference of this kingdome from the former gouernment of Iudges, consisting especially in two thinges, the speciall power which it had ouer the people, and the speciall maiestie of it, both which were exceeding great in this state, yea so great, that in these respectes the gouernment of the iudges may seeme not onely a meane but almost a priuate estate. Hence it is that this kingdome of Israel is by Iacob prophecying of it, Gen. 49.9. compared to a Lion the which doth in strength and especially in a maiesticall statelinesse so farre exceede all other beastes, that it is vsually called the king of them. If we desire to knowe howe it came to passe that there was so greate power and maiestie giuen to this kingdome, we must haue recourse to the originall of it. The causes of the setting vppe of this estate were two: The first is that which may be saide to bee the cause of all thinges in the worlde, to witte, the eternall counsell and decree of God by the which it was before al ages appointed, that the king of Israell shoulde be a type of Christ,The kingdome of Israel a type of Christes kingdome. and his temporarie gouernment a type of the spirituall and eternall kingdome of Christ as is afterwarde to be declared. Nowe that this kingdome might be a fitte and liuely type, it was needfull that it shoulde be endued with a greate measure of power and maiestie, that so it might the more liuely represente the infinite power and authoritie which the Messias was to haue ouer all creatures in heauen and in earth, and likewise his vnspeakable [Page 11] and incomprehensible maiesty and glorie filling the heauen of heauens: The second cause of the greate power and maiesty of this kingdome was the desire or rather the will of the people who did so earnestly, yea so eagerly and importunately call for this stately gouernment that they would take no denyall, nor heare any thing which coulde be alledged to be contrarie. For that the people did alwaies desire this state, we may see, Deutro. 17.14. where God foretelleth this; that when they were once possessed of the lande they woulde haue a King, and Iudg. 8.22. where they offer to make Gedeon king: and more plainely, Iudges. 9. where they like Abimeleches opinion saying, that it was better for them to haue one then many to raigne ouer them. Neyther did they desire to haue one sette ouer them with the bare name and title of a kinge or with anie meane authoritie, but that hee shoulde haue power and maiestie in the highest degree. For howsoeuer it might seeme that this their desire was in some respecte incommodious to themselues, for that the greater power they gaue to the king, the lesse libertie they lefte to themselues, and the greater that his pompe and maiestie was, the more heauie tributes must be imposed on them for the maintayning of it, yet they did so vehementlie desire to be like to other nations in a stately monarchie, that they thought no price too greate for it, thinking belike, as it is commonlye saide, that it was greater honour for them to make a mightie and a glorious Kinge, [Page 12] then to be kings thēselues as euery one was in the time of the Iudges wherein euery man did that which was good in his own eyes, because they had no king to order them, Iudg. 18.1.19.1. And yet we do not deny, but that in ordaining so mighty & maiestical an authority they thought it would be for their owne good howsoeuer it might seeme to derogate from their liberty and profitte, and that the commodities would be moe and more waightie then the inconueniences of it: wherein whether they did iudge right or no let others determine.
Sect. IIII.
NOW we are to come to the particular declaration of these things: First of the power of this kingdome, and secondly of the maiestie of it: The doctrine of the power hath in it these foure questions: The first is, whether the power of the king were whole or deuided: The second, whether it were generall ouer all persons and causes or restrained: The third, whether it were absolute, or tied to lawes: The last whether it were a milde or a peremptory power. The power whereof we doe intreate, is the full, supreame and vniuersall authoritie (for of any inferiour power we doe not speake) of gouerning the people and of ordering all their publicke affaires: the which before that this kingdome was set vp, was not wholy in any one hand, but deuided amongst many. For it was partly in the handes of God, [Page 13] partly in the handes of the iudge which was for the time, partly in the handes of the elders or senat, and partly in the handes of the bodie of the people. For the first where we say that God had a part of this authoritie, we doe not consider him simply as God, for in that respect, not a part only but the whole supreame power not of that country onely, but of all the nations in the world, yea of heauen and earth was and is in his handes: but we consider him as he was after a speciall manner the king and ruler of this people,How God was the king of Israel. so as he neuer was or will be to any other nation. The actions of God, which did proceede from this his regal authoritie were these. First that he gaue to this people iudiciall lawes and constitutions which is part of the office not of God, for then these iudiciall lawes should belong to the whole world, seeing GOD is the God, not of the Iewes only but also of the gentils. But other nations are not tyed to these laws but only to the morall law, and to these Iudicials so farre as they are morall, to wit, to the grounds and equitie of them, but not to the lawes themselues. The second thing which God did by vertue of this authoritie was the supreme administration of their battailes in cases of greate extremitie. For as greate princes sende captaines to fight in their steade, yet according to their direction and appointment, so God did immediately either by his word or spirit stirre vp some man to fight the battailes of the people and did directe them in such actions. And this Gedeon acknowledgeth, [Page 14] Iudges. 7.20. Where hee saith, the sworde of the Lorde and of Gedeon. In these respectes GOD was the kinge of this nation as Gedeon doth confesse, Iudges. 8.23. who so answereth the people going aboute to make him kinge, that neyther hee nor anie of his posteritie shoulde raigne ouer them, but God shoulde still bee their kinge. But after that they had made a kinge, neyther did the iudiciall lawes retayne their full force, neyther did GOD himselfe appoynte Captaines ouer the Armies,The iudicial law in part abrogated by the erecting of this kingdome. but all was done according to the will and commaundement of the kinges: who although they did keepe the iudiciall lawe in parte, and for the greate extremities in warre asked counsell of God, yet they were free in both these respectes, as we are afterwarde to declare more at large. So that by the comming in of these kinges, God himselfe (if we may so basely speake of his glorious maiestie) was put out of his office,God put from his kingdome. as hee himselfe doth confesse. 1. Sam. 8.7. where hee speaketh to Samuell not to be grieued, for that the people had cast off his and his sonnes gouernment, for indeede, saith God, they haue not despised or cast awaie thee, but mee, and haue refused that I shoulde raigne ouer them, In the seconde place, the iudges had parte of this supreame authoritie, who although in the greatest matters they were ouer-ruled by the worde of God, yet in the ordinarie administration especially of warelike affaires, they were the chiefe. And therefore the state of the common wealth from Moses to Saule [Page 15] the first king is called the gouernment of the Iudges: the which did wholly cease after that Saule was created king: for the Captaines of the warre were either the kinges themselues or whom it pleased them to appointe. So wee [...]eade that Dauid placed and displaced Ioab, at his pleasure. Thirdlie the bodie of the people ioyning together in a general assembly had a part, yea the greatest part of this authoritie, and likewise the elders (who were a compendious bodie of the people) had their part especially in ciuill administration in the time of peace, Iudg. 20. The children of Israel came together as one man to the Lord in Maspha, to whome the leuite maketh his complaint as vnto them who had authoritie to reuenge the villanie done vnto him, desiring them to determine of that cause: as they did with greate seueritie. The causes why the people and the elders had parte of this supreme authoritie, were these; First for that they did neuer giue the whole power ouer themselues into the handes of anie of the Iudges, but onely did as it were vse them to be their Captaines and leaders in the time of warre: the which beeing ended,What authoritie the people had before the time of the Kinges. vsually the iudge returned to his owne house and priuate estate till the like necessitie called him abroade againe: but during the time of peace they did not meddle much with ciuill iurisdiction but onely hearde those causes which were brought vnto them as to fitte arbiters, because they were men renoumed eyther for their valour, or because they were prophetes, as were Debora and Samuell, or had the office of the high prieste as had Ely. Hence it is that in this [Page 16] booke of iudges there is no mention made of their ciuil iudgements or that they did cal together the Senate or the people, vnlesse it were to warre, or of any edictes which they made or of faults which they did redresse or punish. Only of Samuel it is written that he went about the land to iudge the people, and of Debora that the people brought their controuersies to her. The second cause of the authoritie of the elders and people, was the want a Iudge: for whenas the Iudge died, they did not streightway put another in his place vntill they had occasion giuen by warre: during which time of vacation, the elders and people in euery citie did iudge their owne causes, and meeting together in a common assē bly did order publike matters although seldome and negligently as the people vse to gouerne. So that they wanted a Iudge as often as they had one. But when once they had a king created, there did no more any supreame authoritie remaine either in elders or people, all being giuen vnto the hands of the king, who had no man which did participat with him in his authoritie: For we are not to thinke that in this state the king was the chiefe gouernour and the elders,No authoritie in Israel but in the hands of the king. senators and inferiour officers, fellow gouernours and as it were his mates. For all within the land of Israel were to the king meere priuate men, so that if any had authoritie in respect of the people, they had it all from him, as from the fountaine: all the officers of the kingdome, all the Iudges of ciuill causes and the captaines of the armies were appointted by him. Yea they were [Page 17] so farre from hauing any authoritie in respect of the king, that all the people with their magistrates and officers of what kinde soeuer, are vsually called the kinges seruantes: so 2. Chro. 10.6. The counsellers of Salomon are saide to haue stood before his face, to wit, waiting and attending his pleasure, so Esa. 37.5. Officers of the king and elder [...] of the priestes are called the kings seruantes. For the state of this kingdome was not such a gouernment as both hath beene and is at this day in vse in many places, where the people to auoide confusion, and for the administration of iustice, and of other publike affaires, doe for one ouer them, yea and giue vnto him although improperly the name of a king, reseruing to themselues authority eyther to displace him at their pleasure or at the least to controll his doings, which they thinke to be wrong, to call him to account of his administration, yea if need be, to rise vp in armes against him and to lay violent handes vpon him: This was no such gouernment, but a kingdome both in name and in trueth: wherein none had any iot of supreame authority saue the king onely.
Sect. V.
BVT if it be graunted that there was no authoritie in the land which could associate it selfe with the authoritie of the king or any way intermeddle with his lawful administration as long as he did rule with religion and iustice for the glory of God & the good of the people, yet it may seeme that there [Page 18] was some authoritie to restraine him if at any time he should be imperious or vniust in his gouernment: whereby he should be, eyther brought to a lawfull manner of ruling, or else if he were incorrigible, deposed from his kingdome. For otherwise the people might be miserably oppressed, religion defaced, yea all thinges turned vpside downe and in the ende the commonwealth vtterly ouerthrowen: and therefore that both wisedome, reason and necessitie, i [...] the glorie of God and the good of men doe require that there should be in Israell some other authoritie eyther in the people, or in the priestes, in the senate, or in the inferiour magistrates, the which should neuer be eyther vsed or once mentioned, but against those kinges which did degenerate into violent and bloody tyrantes, euen as men vse a false & vnder raine to pull in strong headed horses which otherwise woulde runne into some pit & so destroy both themselues & the riders. This reason taken from the safety of the people of states and commonwealthes, the ground, square, and end of all good pollicie carieth with it such a faire shew of equitie and necessitie that like vnto a violent streame it hath caried many headlong in heate to condemne and reiect vtterly these absolute Monarchies as tyrannicall and barbarous kindes of gouernment pernitious to men, yea altogether vnlawful and vnmeete for the Church of God. But we ought not to suffer our selues to be deceiued by any appearance or pretence whatsoeuer or in respect of any inconueniences, although neuer so great to iudge that to be vnlawfull and prophane, which [Page 19] God by establishing it in his Church hath shewed to be holy and lawfull. But for the further resoluing of this question, it is requisite that we againe put you in minde, that we doe not heere speake, eyther what ought to be the state of al kingdomes in this behalfe, or that this is the best kinde of gouernment, but only doe shew what was the state of this kingdome of Israell. In the which it seemeth that the whole power of ruling the lande was giuen by God and by the people into the handes of the king, without any exception whatsoeuer: insomuch that the people did not reserue to themselues any power whereby they might lawfully resist his authoritie or oppose themselues to his proceedings although vnlawfull and vniust much lesse take from him the kingdome, or to offer any manner of violence vnto his person. For the authoritie of this king ouer his people was no lesse then is the authoritie of a father in his familie in respect of his children,The king to his subiects as a father to his children. who if he doe iniuriously intreat any of them or not carefully keep his own goods or liue any way disorderly, it is the duety of his children, if not with silence to suffer it, yet with great modesty to admonish him of it. But if they should ioyne themselues together, and offer any violence vnto him especially if they should throw him out of his house, all men woulde count them rebellious and vngratious children. But if they shoulde take his life from him, they were to be esteemed notoriously wicked, ye rather as monsters, worthy to be abhorred of all men. So, it seemeth that the state of this kingdome was such as that no subiect of what place soeuer, [Page 20] no not the whol people iointly could lawfully vse any violence against the kings person or proceedinges: and that the king might although not lawfully in respect of the lawe of God, of men, or of nature, yet safely and freely in respect of his subiectes doe whatsoeuer pleased him: according as Iacob foretelleth, Gen. 49.9. that Iuda the king of his brethren should be as the great Lion who when he laieth himselfe downe, who shall raise him vppe or disquiet him? The trueth heereof appeareth in the whole course of the story of the kings who praesuming vpon this whole and vndeuided authority, did neuer feare or doubt to doe whatsoeuer they listed without asking leaue eyther at nobles, elders, or people. Hence came that foolish, and tyrannicall answer which Rehoboā made to the people threatning them, 1. King. 12.12. in this manner, My least part shal be heauier then my fathers loynes, whereby he meant that he would encrease those heauie burdens of tributes, which his father had laide vpon them. For but that he knewe verie well the state of his kingdome to be such, as that he might both say and doe what he listed without controlement, he had beene more then mad to make such an answere. And hence it came that the idolatrous kinges did neuer sticke by their sole authoritie to set vp open idolatrie not once minding who would be offended therewith: and likewise the continuall practise of the people doth declare that they did not violētly oppose thēselues to the doings eyther of the good or of the wicked kinges, but suffered religion to stand and fall according to their pleasure. Yea the dealing of God himselfe doth prooue [Page 21] the same, who when he purposed to preserue Dauid against the fury of Saule, would neuer suffer him to oppose Ceila or any other of Saules cit [...]es against him but made him fly first into the mountains and deserts, and afterwardes out of the land to the Philistines. Yea Dauid although he were appointed by the expresse worde of God to s [...]cceede Saule in the kingdome, yet he was so farre from laying violent handes vpon him, that as we reade. 1. Sam. 24.6. his heart smote him, that is, his conscience did accuse him that he had behaued himselfe disloyally against the king, in that he had offered violence to the kings garment, because that was as a threatning of death vnto him and a greate disgrace. Yea further we doe not reade, that God did euer by any of his prophets stirre vp the people to maintaine his true wo [...]shippe by violence against the kinges,The prophets neuer reproue the people for not resisting the idolatrous kings. or euer reproue them because they had suffered them to set vppe idolatrie, which is an euident proofe of this point. For if it had beene lawfull to resist in any case, then surely in the maintenance of the true worshippe of God and of his glorie. But heereof there is a great question made: for although this king had power in ciuill matters to doe not onely right & iustice without the helpe of any other power, but also wrong without resistance, shall we therefore giue vnto him this power in the cause of religion that he may deface the worshippe of God at his pleasure? It may seeme much better that not onely kings should be throwen downe from their thrones, but also that heauen and earth shoulde goe togither, then that God should be dishonoured and detestable idolatrie [Page 22] erected. We confesse that it is a most fearefull thing that the king of Israell who hath his authority from God, should vse the same to dishonor God and thrust not only men out of their houses & landes, but also the great God of heauen & earth out of his tēple and Church, yea in trueth (in some sort) out of the world: for God had tyed his visible Church to this land. And therefore we answere that as it is vsually saide, Si ius violandum, regni causâ violandum, so Si ius regni sit violandum, religionis causa est violandum, that if it be lawfull for the people of Israell for any cause to resist their lawfull king,Vnlawfull to vse violeēe against the ki [...]g in the maintenance of religion. it is lawfull in the defence of the true religion and Gods glory. But as hath beene said, it seemeth that the state of this kingdome would not beare any resistance no not in this case, much lesse in any other. No man, yea no company of men could for any offence committed by the king, eyther against God or man, the first or second table, call him to account, summon him to appeare in iudgement, or vse any manner of violence eyther in word or deede against him. Now we are to answere those thinges which may be obiected against this assertion.
Sect. VI.
FIrst it may seeme agreeable to reason that the people should haue power to depose their king as well as they had to set him vppe. Whereunto we answere that although it were at the first free vnto [Page 23] the people whether they would haue permitted themselues wholly to the power of the king or no,The people could not resume their liberty giuen into the handes of the kings yet when as they had once refigned vp their liberty and authority, it was not in their power to call that their voluntarie graunt backe againe: Secondly we answere that the people neuer had this power in their handes to make whome they would king they did indeede voluntarilie choose this kinde of gouernment, but God gaue them a king whome they coulde neyther refuse at the first nor afterwardes depose, to wit, Saule with his posteritie, and they being by God reiected, Dauid with his seede: for God kept in his hand the power of nominating the king as the expresse wordes of the scripture doe witnesse,It belonged not to the people but to God to nominate the king. Deutro. 17.15. Onely thou shalt make him king ouer them whom the Lord thy God shall giue vnto thee. Againe it may be obiected, forsomuch as not onely kings but also all other magistrates are set vp for the glorie of God, and the good of the people that if they doe not, not onely not further but also hinder these respectes, they do break the condition of the bargain betwixt them & the people, and so do forfait their kingdomes into their hands as Saul did forfait his, and Salomon by his idolatrie the gouernment of the ten tribes: we answer confessing this to be true that the kings of Israel had the kingdome vpon the foresaid condition, but yet neyther the kingdome was giuen nor the condition imposed to them by man but by God: & therefore they could not forfait their kingdom to man but only to God: neither coul [...] any man exact this forfaiture at their handes without an extraordinarie and speciall commission [Page 24] from God. So that vntil such time as God did either immediatly by his own hand or by the means of some man made the executioner of his will by extraordinarie reuelation, depriue them of their kingdome, euen the wicked and idolatrous kinges did remaine to the people in the full estate and right of the kingdome. So after that both Saule had by his disobedience forfeited his kingdome of God, and also Dauid was now both appointed by God and annointed by Samuel, Saul remained the lawfull king of Israell after that Dauid was annointed and appointed to the kingdome. king in his steade, yet Saul remained to the people the onely lawfull king of Israell: yea no lesse lawfull then he was before or any other afterwardes, vntill such time as God did take from him both his life and kingdome together. This doth Dauid ingenuously confesse, 1. Sam. 26.10.11, saying, that it was not lawfull for himselfe or any other to touch Saule beeing Gods annointed, for that he could be dispossessed by none but by God onely: wherein he rested, not doubting but that God would take him away, eyther by naturall death, or by the force of the enemie or immediately by his owne hand. 1. Sam. 26.10.The rebellion of Ieroboam & of the tenne tribes vnlawfull. Likewise Salomon did forfaite his kingdome to God, but yet th [...] ten tribes with al their kings made of themselues, did vnlawfully and impiouslie rebell against Rehoboam; for so speaketh Abiam, 2. Chro. 13·6.7. You ought to haue acknowledged that God gaue the kingdome of Israel to Dauid and his sonnes for euer, but Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat rose vp and rebelled against his Lord and naughtie men gathered themselues to him and strengthened themselues against Rehoboam. So that although the defection came from the Lord as appeareth, 2. Chro. 11.4. and was good in that respect beeing a iust punishment [Page 25] of idolatrie, yet the action of the people rebelling against their lawfull and naturall king, was altogether vnlawfull. If it be obiected that Ieroboam was called to be king of the ten tribes by the word of God sent by the ministery of the prophet Achijah, King. 11.31. where God saith to Ieroboam by the prophet, that he had [...]iuen to him ten tribes of Israell: to this we make two answeres; First that although this defection, as it came from God, was good, yet as it was practised by Ieroboam and the people, it was vnlawful rebellion. For there is in God a secret wil the which (when it is contrarie to his reue [...]led will and worde) cannot be executed by man without sinne (vnlesse it be by an extraordinarie dispensation) and therefore although God did make this his secret will knowen to Ieroboam, to make his vnthankfulnesse in erecting idolatrie the more inexcusable, yet he did not bid him rebell against Salomon, neyther did he annointe him king, as he did Iehu. 2. King. 9.6.7. who had the expresse commaundement of God to roote out kinge Achabs house. Thus God foretolde Hazael that hee shoulde be kinge of Syria. 2. King. 8.13. yet he did not approue his detestable murthering of the kinge his master. So did Zimri, Hazaels rebellion foretold by God but not permitted. 1. King. 16.12. although he also did execute the sentence which God had pronounced against the house of Bahasa king of the ten tribes, yet because he was not appointed by God so to do, his action was vnlawfull. Secondly we answere that if that foretelling of Ieroboam were an extraordinarie dispensation, yet his example doth not iustifie the rebellion of the people or of any other who haue not [Page 26] this warrant for their actions. But Dauid did lawfully rebell against the posteritie of Saul, and so did Iehu against Ioram, 2. King. 9. because they had the expresse word of God so to doe. But heere this is to be noted that although this kingdome were at the first so instituted that all the kinges should by their disobedience forfait their kingdome to God, [...]nd so be deposed when he thought good,God would not take the kingdome from Dauids posterity. The kingdome so annexed to the house of Dauid, that it could not be taken from it. yet Dauid and his posteritie were in a manner freede from this condition and from forfaiting their kingdome to God. For Dauid a man according to the heart of God, found such fauour in his sight that he made this solemne lawe, oath, and promise, that although his children did forsake him, yet he would not take the kingdom from them as he did from Saul but onely chastice them for their sinnes. And therefore the seede of Dauid kept the crowne (yea tho many of them were open idolatours) til the whole nation of the Iewes was destroyed and caried away captiue into Babel for their idolatrie and other sinnes. Therefore God is saide, 2. Chro. 13.5. to haue giuen this kingdome to Dauid by a couenant of salt, that is, by a perpetuall and inuiolable couenant, for so it was needfull that the promises of the Messias shoulde be annexed to some stocke or linage, that out of it hee might cotinually be expected. But to returne to the matter in hand, if it be heere asked how God did punish the notorius sins & mis [...]emenors of these kings; we answer that he did it either immediatly by his own hand as he did smite Ozias with leprosie for his intollerable presumption, 2. Chr. 26, 19. or else by some forraine nation or king as by the Philistines, Aegyptians, [Page 27] Chaldaeaens, Assyriaens, or some other nation and prince whō he vsed as scourges for the misdemeanor of these kings: wherof more hereafter. Now we are to answer to the examples which may seeme to be contrary to this rule, the which if they be indeed contrary to it, yet they do not take away this truth: for a few wrong actions cānot preiu [...]ice a law, yea a long practise and custome of right. But let vs see what they are: First the people do seem to haue resisted Saul in that they saued Ionathan from death, wherunto he was euen deuoted by the kings solemne oth & promise: we answere that they did perswade the king by reason, not resist him by force as doth appeare by their words, 1. Sā. 14.45. but the example of Libna is more plaine, the which rebelled against Iehorā because he did forsake the Lord. 2. Chr. 21.10. but this one example is not sufficient, for it is not approued but only barely mentioned by the writer of the story: yea many actions in the scripture are cōmended as proceding from a godly mind which in straight examinatiō would be found vnlawful. Thirdly the deposing of Athalia, 2. Chro. 23. maketh not against vs. For we do heere speak of a lawful king but she was a meer vsurper: because she was not of Dauids seed. Lastly as touching the cōspiracies made against Ioas for killing Zacharias the son of Iehoida, God neuer approued any conspiracy made against any of the kings 2. Chr. 24.25. & against Amasia for forsaking the lord, 2. Chr. 25.27. the writer of the story doth not meane that the conspirators were moued by those reasons or had any purpose of reuenging those offences moued by other sinister respects not mentioned but that God brought those feareful iudgments vpon these kings for the foresaid sins.
Sect. VII.
IT may heere be asked what shoulde then be the issue of the violence and tyranny which any of these kinges might perhaps vse, what ord [...] was taken, and what was the behauiour of loyal subiectes in such cases: we answere that the weapons which God gaue vnto his people wherewith to defend themselues against the tyrannie of their lawf [...]ll kinges were these. The first is wisedome carefully to auoyde all occasions of the kinges anger and iniurie:With what weapons this people might fight against their kinges. and because that they who are disposed to be iniurious to their subiectes, neuer want occasions which they take where none is offered, therefore the next remedie is to auoyde and decline from the violence or iniury it self. Thus did Dauid by flying into dens, caues and mountaines, keepe himselfe from the rage of Saule. The thirde remedie where the second is wanting, is patience to suffer with a quiet minde, the violence or iniustice of the king which could not be by wisedom eyther preuented or auoyded. The last remedie is to appeale from the vniust sentence of the king not to any man or to any court heere on earth but to the king of kinges euen to God himselfe whose eares are alwaies open to heare those who are oppressed: this remedie is the last, and therfore not to be vsed but in cases of greatest extremitie when as the violence is too too grieuous, shamefull and to mans infirmity altogether intollerable. This meanes did Samuell [Page 29] commend vnto the people, whereby they shoulde ease themselues of those intollerable burdens of tributes which their king would lay vpon them, 1. Sam. 8.18. saying, then you beeing thus oppressed by your king, shall not rebell against him, but shall cry vnto the Lord. Where it is added that God wil not heare them when they c [...]y, this is m [...]nt that they could not afterwards put down their kings, neyther be freed from their tyranny which by their own wilfulnes they had brought vpon themselues: otherwise God doth heare those who being intollerably iniured by their kinges do appeale vnto him. So we read, 2. Chro. 4.22. that when as Zacharias was stoned by the commaundement of king Ioas hee appealed to God and commended his cause to him. Where the spirit of God hath carefully noted that God receiued his appeale, so that within one yeare he sent the Armies of the Syrians who destroyed his princes and spoyled Ierusalem. Yea the seruants of the king by the iust iudgement of God, although vnlawfully, cōspired against him & killed him for the death of Zacharias. Yea this was the vsuall meanes wherby God did punish the sinne and represse the rage of idolatrous kings, euen the power of forraine princes into whose handes he did often giue these kings of Iuda with their people and kingdome but did neuer by his word arme any of their subiects against them: therin as in al other his actions obseruing decorum which is the rule of seemlines or ciuil order & honesty, vnto the which it is agreeable that kings should be chastened & controlled not by their subiectes and inferiours, but by other kings which are their equals.
Sect. VIII.
LAstly it may be obiected that it is a verie vnlike matter that this people with their wise elders and senatours, were or could be so farre ouerseen [...]s that liuing vnder a moderate gouerment in the which either they neuer had any iniury offered vnto them by their rulers, or if they had, might easely haue it redressed by some other lawful authority, would permit themselues, their wiues and children, landes and libertie to any such authority vnder the which they were subiect to iniury, yea in such sort as that they had no refuge to fly vnto in any extremitie, no superiour authority to appeale vnto, no stronger power to oppose, and finally which both might easely be come tyrannicall, and beeing so, could not by any meanes which they could vse, be eyther ended or amended. Whereunto we answere, first as before, that heere we doe onely make a bare narration, what was done, leauing it to those who professe skill in these matters, to iudge whether it were wisely done or no. Secondly that we may giue some reason hereof, that this was done according to the simplicitie of the first ages of the world,Why absolute monarchies were more in vse in the first ages of the world. wherein men were much more innocent then they are in these daies, and did not so easely inferre iniury to others, and therfore not feare to receiue hurt from others. Whereby it came to passe that men did both safely and securely permi [...] [...]hemselues into th [...] handes of others, ey [...]her kinges, [Page 31] Lordes or masters, or any other rulers, without making couenantes with them and taking caution of them for their security. But the state of the worlde is much altered, for nowe men are growen to that hight and ripenes of craft, deceit, dissimulation, violence and all other kindes of wickednesse, that almost euerie man feareth and suspecteth each other, neyther will haue any dealinges with any other without greate pledges of securitie. Heereof it hath come to passe that these greate monarchies endued with absolute power, were farre more vs [...]d in the first ages of the worlde then in the times following: wherein wee see that although a monarchicall state be thought more excellent and commodious then any other kinde of gouernment, yet men dare not giue vnto it this ample and absolute power, thinking that as that wine is most wholsome which is taken not in the full vigor and naturall strength but tempered and delayed with some colde liquor; so that manarchie is most safe and acceptable, the power whereof is moderated and yoked with some other power of positiue lawes or of parliamentes, of the nobilitie or of the people whereby it may be restrained from iniurie, iniustice and tyranny when it is needefull. Thirdlye we answere that if we may as vnskilfull and ignorante men vse to doe, iudge of the causes by the effectes, and of counsels by the euent, it should seeme that this people did not loose much by this bargaine: for that the state of their common-wealth, was much better vnder the [Page 30] gouernment of the kinges then before, when as the administration of ciuil affaires was very dissolute and remisse, yea often times wholly wanting: for that the publike authoritie, being as hath beene declared, deuided amongest many, to wit, the iudge, the high priest, the elders, the princes of the tribes, and the people, was eyther wholly or in p [...]rt neglected of all, so that as it is written, Iudg. 21.25. euery man did what him listed both in committing and also in redressing iniuries, because there was no king in Israel: but after that there was once a kinge made, they neuer wanted gouernment, yea they had it more strict and seuere then perhaps they desired. Likewise for the other part of the gouernment which is in warlike affaires, it is without question that their state was much bettered by this chaunge. Before, they were a common preie to the nations neere vnto them, and so often subdued and captiuated eyght yeares to Chusan King of Syria Iudg. 3.7. to the King of Moab. 18. to Iabin. 20, yeares, Iudg. 4.3. to the Madianites 7. yeares, Iudg. 6.1. to the Ammonites. 18. yeares, Iudg. 10.8.9. to the Philistines 40. yeares, Iudg. 13.2. that it might seeme true which many ages afterward was spoken of them, that they were a nation borne to slauery: but by their kings they were not onely freed from beeing so often subdued, but also made conquerers and rulers of other nations. The Iudges deliuered them from their enemies, but their kings deliuered their enemies to them making them tributaries to the people: before they were not pinched with heauie tributs so as afterwards by their kinges, but they were much more often spoiled [Page 33] and their land cleane wasted by forraine inuasion: before in the time of peace the common people did more abound with welth, because they were free from publike burdens, but the publike estate was verie meane, when as it was at the best, & for the most part very beggerly and miserable: vnder the kinges the commonalty was somewhat impouerished and yet they had as we say, some thing for their money, as namely a stately and glorious Monarchie which they did vehemently desire, and whereof they were not a litle proud: sumptuous palaces for their kings to dwel in, and many faire buildinges for their princes and nobles, especially in Ierusalem with all manner of prouision correspondent thereunto: secondly they had a costly and famous temple wherein to worship God renowmed throughout the whole world for beautie and magnificencie. Thirdly they had horses and chariots, troupes of horsemen, armies of common soldiers kept at the kinges or rather at the common expenses: yea they had fensed and walled Cities and all such like force whereby to resist and subdue their enemies. So we read, 2. Chro. 1. that Salomon had a thousand, and foure hundred chariots, and twelue thousand horsmen, yea he made siluer as plentifull as stones in Ierusalem, and great summes of money were giuen to him for tribute of the kinges of Aegypt, Syria and others there about: and in one word they had a publike estate farre passing in glory any countrie of kingdome neare vnto them.The gouernment of the kings compared with the former. So that if it be, as wise men doe thinke, better to haue a hard gouernment then an anarchie and confusion, to haue publike liberty from forraine power then popular [Page 34] licence from obedience of lawes, to be pinched in their purses, then to be slaine & captiuated in their bodies, wiues and children, to suffer iniurie at home, then slauerie abroad, to maintaine their own naturall kinges, then to enrich forraine nations, to be priuately poore, then publikely base, to haue their Cities fenced then their houses t [...]immed and furnished. Then this people was not so notoriously foolish in choosing this gouernment, as diuers wise men haue thought: Neyther had they a very euill pennywoorth tho they bought it with the price of their own liberty. But we doe not take vpon vs to define any thing but leaue it to those who are seene and exercised in these matters. Onely we say that the chiefe commoditie which they looked for by their king, was safetie from their enemies abroad and execution of iustice at home, as appeareth, 1. Sam. 8.20. wherein they were not frustrate of their expectation.
Sect. IX.
THus we see that the power of the kingdom of Israell, was wholly in the kings owne handes: no other hauing part thereof. In the next place we are to see how farre this power did stretch it selfe abroade. The answere to this question is this, that the power of this kinge did stretch it selfe as farre as the limittes of his kingdome, or lande did: so that there was not anie person or cause within the compasse of his dominions [Page 35] exempte from it. For the persons of men, there was no preheminence of office, no nobilitie or royaltie of bloude, no holinesse of calling or function, neyther any other prerogatiue whatsoeuer, that coulde giue vnto any man this priuiledge, that he shoulde not be subiect to the iurisdiction and power of the king. So Ioab was the grand-captayne in Israell, placed in the highest office in the lande; yea in such an office as doth vsually laugh at and contemne the power of the greatest princes (such vnrulie spirites doth militarie licence breede in many men) and so great a man as that Dauid durste not in the beginning of his raigne call him to account for murthering Abner, but acknowledgeth, that the sonnes of Seruiah were too harde for him, as we may reade, 2. Sam. 3.29. yet wee knowe that Salomon a peaceable kinge made him stoupe to his authoritie, and lay downe his life at his feete. Likewise Adonia was a man more noble in bloude then Kinge Salomon, for he was his elder brother, yet this royall prerogatiue coulde not saue his life: and therefore he was put to death by the sentence of Salomon, for aspyring, nay for looking at, or almost for thinking on the kingdome: for the kinge perceiued by his asking of Abisage Kinge Dauids concubine, that he still kept his firste minde. But although both greate and noble men, and all generallie, which haue any place, office, or calling in the common-wealth, be subiect to this authoritie, yet it may seeme vnmeete that they who [Page 36] are endued with holy functions, especially they who are placed in the highest authority in the Church, should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power, whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places, or continually troubled & interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God, and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled: which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer. For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer, yea the chiefe priestes & in them the high priest himself, the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ,Ecclesiasticall persons subiect to the authoritie and iurisdiction of the king. the Oracle of God, and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed, was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth. The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech, 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare, came with all the priestes that were with him, and being come, acknowledged Saul [...] to be his Lord, Verse. 12. and did not appeale frō his vniust sentence of death to any other power. The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die. 1. King. 2.26. And likewise Zachariah the son of Ieh [...]ida, 2. Chro. 24.21. Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority, yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them: yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole [Page 37] scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so. We knowe that euen Christ himselfe, more holy in person and office then all the priestes, men or angels in the world, did throughout the whole course of his life, submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it, did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended, contu [...]eliously entreated, yea vniustly cō demned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour. Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise. For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes, but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete, and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power, come not near nor yet once touch me, because I am holier then thou, and think themselues too good to be iudged by any, but by their owne ordinarie, yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall, are and ought to be by the word of God, equally subiect to the ciuill power. For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe, stand before the iudgement seat of princes, and shall sinfull men, nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes? no no: the seruant is not aboue the master, nor the creature aboue the creator, and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules, that is, euery man that hath a soule (that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted) ought to be subiect to the higher powers, Rom. 13.1. The ground of the contrary errour, is an arrogant opinion, which presumptuous [Page 38] men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holin [...]sse in respect of others, whereas in the Church of God, men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiastica [...], yea somtimes much more holy: they who haue ecclesiastical & holy callings, being otherwise wicked & prophane: for it is truly said, althoug [...] impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah, Numb. 16.3. That not only Moses & Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people, much more the Lords annoynted is holy. In the next place, we are to search whether that as al persons, so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell. First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes: in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist, forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges, doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction: And so it was indeede. For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome, who should be his counsellers at home, or his Captaines abroad, who shoulde be the iudges of the people, and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem: and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes. For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people, and to fight their battailes, for the which purpose the people desired a king, it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties. Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order [Page 39] them, to make peace with whom he would, and to goe to battaile against whome [...]e when [...] thought good. The trueth of this pointe doth [...] plainely appeare throughout the whole storie, that we need not insist in it.
Sect. X.
NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church, to wit, in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God. Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church, not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it: others suffer him to deale in these causes, yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them: and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man. The which distinction is necessarely to be considered: for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth, for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church, to rule it by his owne lawes and worde. Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God, and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose. But who hath authoritie to doe this, there is all the controuersie: In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable [Page 40] errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church, enter into the common-wealth, inuade the riches, preferments and pleasures of kinges, and vsurpe their states and crownes; haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues [...]uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall. In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement, who in a good meaning & affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power, and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters, and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate, touch me not for I am more holy then thou. But we follow the thirde opinion thinking that the ecclesiasticall authoritie of this land was chiefely, yea in a manner wholly in the handes of the king, and that by his authority the state of religion in generall was wholly set vp, maintained, repaired and ordered, yea ecclesiastical lawes for this purpose established howsoeuer in making them the aduise and consent of others were for diuers necessarie causes to be required. The trueth heereof will easely appeare if we marke that God did deferre the building of his Temple, the inlarging and beautifying of his worshippe vntill the time of the kinges,God deferred the building of the Temple till that the kingdome were erected of whome Dauid and Salomon (which are in this respect to be counted the first, Saule being reiected) did make the state of religion most glorious, established new orders and lawes and that by their owne authoritie, although they had the worde of God both in [Page 41] themselues and from other prophets for their direction. Yea the generall practise of all the kinges of Israel of whome euery one by his sole authority, did either set vp or pul downe religion, doth declare how much they had to doe in the gouerning of the Church and to passe ouer with silence the rest of the kinges, let vs onely see how far Ezechia did meddle with Church affaires, of whome we read, 2. Chro. 29.3. That he opened the doores of the temple, brought the priestes into it, made a solemne oration vnto them, teaching them their dueties and stirring them vp to the carefull perfourmance thereof: then when the priestes had according to his direction, clensed the temple before they doe any seruice in it, they returne to the king to know what he would haue further done, Verse. 18. Then the king with the nobles came and brought a sinne-offering which the priest offered at the commaundement of the king verse. 24. then verse. 27. the king commaundeth that the whole burnt-offering should be offered: Againe verse. 31. he commaundeth that the peoples offeringes shoulde be brought in. Further in the 30. chapter, he held a councel & sent his postes for the keeping of a passeouer: yea, which is worthy to be noted, when as the people being vncleane did receiue the passouer, Ezechias himselfe did publikely pray for them and so made them cleane, verse. 20. likewise chap,. 31. verse. 2. Ezechia appointed sundry companies of the priestes and leuites after the diuersity of the ministrations to serue in the temple, and commaunded the people to make prouision of all thinges needfull for them. and verse 8. and 9. he came and viewed their prouision, and questioned with the priestes about it, And vers. 11 [Page 42] He bad prepare the chambers in the Temple for store, yea it is added verse. 20. that according to this manner, he did throughout all Iuda, and that all the workes about the seruice of God, were begunne and prosperously ended by him. The same manner of ordering the state of the Church appeareth in the storie of Iosias and other Kinges, wherein this may plainely be seene that whatsoeuer was done in Church matters, was done by the commaundement and authoritie of the kinge. The occasions of the contrary opinions, whereby the authoritie of this kingdome in this behalfe is abridged and cut short, eyther in whole or in part, are these: First for that it is thought, that as ciuill and diuine, temporall and eternall matters, do not onely greately differ, but also are opposite to each oother, so that the common-wealth and the Church are two distinct, yea contrary bodies gouerned and ordered by their seuerall heades, as in this state they make the king to be the chiefe gouernour of the common-wealth, and the high priest of the Church. But it is farre otherwise, for the Church is not heere a perfect bodie by it selfe but maketh the ciuil body more excellent & happie.The Church with the common welth make but one bodie. For euen as when any people, being rude and barbarous, are brought to learning and all kinde of humanitie, there is not a new state or body added vnto them but the former estate becommeth better, so it is, whenas any nation of infidels becommeth religious, they haue not one head in respect of their religion, and another in ciuill matters, but one and the same [Page 43] for both. But heereof more at large in the treatise of the publike Church. Neyther ought we to thinke that eyther the office, authoritie, or person of this King was any way prophane or vnholy, or in any respect vnfitte to intermeddle with diuine matters: for he was and that by the institution of God more holy then o [...]hers. As for the hurt which came to the Church by beeing permitted to wicked kinges to be ordered at their pleasure, we confesse that it was very greate: for many of them did cleane ouerthrow the true worshippe of God. Yet there was no remedie for it in the handes of any saue onely of God, who is and was able to turne the hearts of kings, as the riuers of waters, yea to shorten their daies if they continued obstinate in their wickednesse, and to raise vppe in their places good and godlie kinges zealous of his glorie, who abolishing all idolatrie and establishing the true religion by their soueraigne and absolute authoritie in ecclesiasticall causes, did recompence the losse, and comfort the griefe which the Church had by the wicked Kinges: for if the peoele had resisted the wicked and idolatrous kinges in their proceedinges, they shoulde haue diminished the authoritie of godlie kinges,Resisting of wicked kings weakeneth the authority of good kings and by vsing violence against the wickednesse of the one, shoulde haue bounde the hands and hindred the godly indeuours of the other. And this is the cause why men vnto whome the good estate of the Church hath beene deare and pretious haue beene loth to permitte the ordering of Churche-causes to ciuill rulers, [Page 44] because many of them haue beene open enemies to all religion and godlines, and authors of all disorders. Yea Emperours. Kinges, and Princes haue so horribly stained themselues, and beene drunke with the blood of the seruantes of God which they ought to haue cherished and preserued, and haue so often ouerthowen the Church, which they shoulde haue built and maintained, that many are afraide to commit the Church to their hands who haue oftner shewed themselues cruel wolues then careful sheepherds. And therefore it hath beene said by many, that princes should looke to their palaces, and leaue the whole care of the Church to the ministers of the worde, but we see the contrary in this example. And therfore we ought not to speake vntruethes no not in the cause of God, or to maintaine the state of religion in Israel by spoyling the king of that power which god hath giuen vnto him. Lastly as touching ecclesiastical lawes, which were to be made by men for the putting in practise of the worship of God, it may seem that although the setting vp and pulling downe, the reforming and deforming of religion were in the hands of the king, yet to be very vnmeete, that he should meddle in the making of them: whereunto we answere that if the whole ordering of the generall state of religion be permitted vnto him, wee cannot exclude him from the making of lawes, whereby the lawes of God are to be executed. The humane lawes of this Church were very fewe, because almost all the circumstances of the seruice of God were prescribed by the ceremoniall lawe: yet there was alwaies necessary occasion [Page 45] of making some,Ecclesiastical constitutions made by the authority of the kinges. in the which worke the king had the chiefe stroke. Thus did Dauid and Salomon make many ecclesiastical lawes which continued long after in the Church, and are mentioned by Iosias saying 2. Chro. 35.4. Prepare your selues ye Leuites by your companies according to the writing of Dauid, and the writing of Salomon, yet these lawes were made by the aduise of others, to wit, eyther of the prophets as we may see, 2. Chro. 33.15. or of the Church and people. Thus did Ezechias hold a councel, 2. Chro, 30.2. wherin by the aduise of the whole Church, the passeouer was held in the second month: likewise verse. 13, the whole assembly tooke counsell to keepe the feast other seauen daies: so that although these ecclesiasticall constitutions were established by the sole authority of the king, yet they were aduised by others, that nothing should be done in the Church peremptorely by the absolute authority of the king or any other, but rather by the counsel of others, & so with the good liking of al men. Yea an errour cōmitted in the ordering of the church is more grieuous & dangerous, & therfore was to be auoyded as by al other meanes, so especially by taking the aduise of others in making lawes for this purpose. Yet it did not belong to the king to take vppon him the office of the high priest as we may see in the example of Ozias, 2. Chro. 26. or to meddle with the proper dueties of any other ecclesiasticall person, or yet to change the ceremonial law, but onely to order the publike state of religion, to make by the aduise of others, and to establishe by his own authority those lawes which serued for that purpose,
Sect. XI.
THere remaine two other properties of this regall power, to wit, that it was absolute and peremptorie, the which we will propounde verie briefly. For the first, we doe not meane that this power was so loosed from lawes that the king might doe what him listed, for he was tied to some lawes as namely, first to the keeping of the morall law, yea vpon paine of forfaiting and loosing his kingdome if he did wickedly transgresse the same: and if at anie time he did commaund contrarie to this lawe, he was not to be obeyed, 1. King. 18.13. 1. Sam. 22.17. and secondly the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome, the state whereof it was not in his power to alter. Yea also he was tied to the ceremoniall lawe containing the outward manner of the worshippe of God. But he was loosed first from the Iudiciall lawe of God, and secondly from all possitiue lawes made by men. By the Iudiciall lawes are vsually ment all those lawes of Moses which belong vnto the practise of the second table, and of such dueties as we owe to our neighbour. And it is, as it were, an addition to the seconde Table, as the ceremoniall lawe is to the first. But heere wee meane more specially onely so many of them as did belong to the publike administration of the common-wealth which may properly be called politicall, iudiciall, or forensicall, concerning the manner [Page 47] of administring iustice and iudgement, as namely in what order iudgement ought to beginne and proceede, what punishmente ought to be inflicted for euerie seuerall offence, and also howe they shoulde behaue themselues in battaile: in all which the Iudges, Elders and people had a prescript forme which they did follow, and were bound by the commaundement of God so to doe. But the kinges were freed from these lawes,The kings exempted from the Iudiciall lawes. so that if they did execute iustice and iudgement, it was free for them to doe it in what forme & manner they thought best: as for example, the iudiciall lawe required that when any had committed any hainous trespasse there shoulde be two or three witnesses solemnely produced and that they shoulde beginne the execution, and first throwe stones at the offendour. But the kinges namely Saule, Dauid and Salomon did put diuerse to death without obseruation of any of these circumstances. Neyther heerein did they sinne against God and his lawe, because they were freed from it. Yea it belonged to the king to make these positiue lawes of the circumstances of executing iudgement, and therefore to be a iudge, a lawgiuer, a kinge and a defender from forraine enemies are all ioyned together. Isa. 23.22. the Lord is our iudge, our law-giuer, our kinge and he shall saue vs. Yea the power of this kingdome was such in this behalfe that the kinge might of himselfe, without calling any to consultation, make, publishe, establishe and execute lawes and edictes, whereof there are manie examples: [Page 48] yet it was more vsuall, yea and conuenient in regard both of king and people, that the aduise of the priests, prophets, rulers and elders of the people shoulde be taken. Lastly this power of this kingdome, herein differeth from the power of the Iudges, Elders and of the people in that it was not so gentle and milde but after a sort, a fierce and peremptorie power as may easelie be gathered by that which hath beene spoken of it: for where there is a greate, generall and absolute power wholly in any one hand, it must needs be of this nature. Hence it was that the people stood in farre greater awe of this authority, then of any other, insomuch that the lawes, edictes and commaundementes of the kinges were like vnto the roaring of a Lyon, whereat all the beastes in the forrest doe tremble and quake for feare. Yea their whole behauiour was much more reuerent to the kinges then to their other rulers. So we read, Iudg. 8.1. and 12. that whenas Gedeon and Iephta had gotten notable victories of the enemie, the Ephramites came vpon them very presumptuously to quarrell with them because for sooth they had not taken them with thē to the battaile: but they did not vse to aske their kings any such questions, or to require any reason of their doings, but did readelie come when they called, goe when they sent, and do whatsoeuer thing was inioined by them. Yea we may wel thinke that the cause why Rehoboam gaue the people such a strange answere, was not for that he ment to increase their tributes, for there was no cause why he shoulde so doe, the temple and the kinges pallaces being builte, and the king being furnished with all thinges requisite [Page 49] eyther for maiesty at home, or strength abroade, for the which purpose those gret tributes were imposed, but rather because he and his young counsell were highly offended and inflamed with anger against the people, for that they did offer to make him a conditionall king, who should not raigne, but vpon those conditions which they propounded. To take one example of many and so to conclude this point, and specially the first edict which the first king made, and that by the immediate motion of the spirit of God, because this is most for the purpose of the matter in hand. We read. 1. Sam. 11.17. that whenas Saule was to call the people together to battaile, he gaue foorth such a peremptorie commaundement as neuer any of the Iudges or Elders did. For taking a couple of oxen, and deuiding them into peeces, he sent them to all partes of the land with this message that whosoeuer did not follow him to battaile, so shoulde it be done to his oxen. Whereupon the people came roundly as one man, for that, as the text noteth, the feare of the Lord, that is of this greate power which the Lord had giuen to the king, fell vpon them. Saule might haue said with Dauid I am yet a tender and newe king and haue many enemies: wherefore it is not meete that I shoulde exasperate the people by threarning them: but it was the will of God, that the people shoulde see in the beginning to what a kinde of power they had [...]mitted themselues.
Sect. XII.
THus much of the power or authority of this kingdome, the second part of the doctrine of it is the maiesty of it; & the fundamental lawes of the kingdom belonging therunto. The maiesty of the kingdom is the great glorie and excellency, wherein it far passeth other kindes of gouernment, and for the which it is much more highly esteemed. It was procured by these meanes; First by that exceeding great power wherof we haue spoken: for whereas the whole administration of all thinges is in the handes of one, there the good estate of all men publikely and of euery one particularly doth depend on him,Great power bringeth with it great maiesty. whereby it commeth to passe that all mens eyes are set on him, yea all men doe honour, praise and admire him in whom they see great authoritie and riches, and whose wisedome is more conspicuous then any others besides. Secondly this kingdome was maiesticall by the first originall of it, which it had not from man but from God. This law is written, Deut. 17.14. When thou hast possessed the land and sayest, I will haue a king to raigne ouer me, thou shalt make him king whome the Lord thy God shall choose: and so the euent proued, for the state of this kingdome in generall came from the people, to whome also it belonged solemnly to acknowledge him whom God did appoint: but the nomination of the particular man on whom this honour should be bestowed came from [Page 51] God who appointed first Saul with his posterity and afterwardes (Saul being reiected) Dauid and his seed. By the which meanes God did choose all the kinges in Israel, although he did immediately by his owne voyce onely appoint the first three, to wit, Saule, The diuine original of this kingdome made it maiesticall. Dauid and Salomon. For euen as the fire wherewith the sacrifices were burnt, although it were nourished euerie day by the priest putting fresh wood vnto it, and so preserued by the same meanes; wherby other fire is kept, yet be cause at the first it came downe from heauen miraculously, was therfore counted holy and wonderfull; euen so was this kingdom because at the first it came from God although afterwardes it were continued by naturall and ordinarie propagation. Hence it is that this kingdom is called the kingdome of Iehoua 2. Chro. 13.8. The badge and seale of this diuine originall of this kingdome was that holie vnction, whereby these kinges were by the prophets of God solemnly in the name of God inaugurated: and therefore the signe, being put for the thing signified, this annointing betokeneth the holinesse of it:The annointing of these kinges signified the holinesse of their persons and functions. insomuch that when the king of Israell is as it were to be painted forth in the natiue colours of his maiestie, he is called the annointed of the Lorde. Thus 1. Sam. 24.7. God forbid saith Dauid, that I should lay my handes on Saule seeing he is the annoynted one of GOD. And 2. Samuell. 1.14. hee saith to him who had helpt kinge Saule to kill himselfe, Howe was it that thou diddest not feare to put out thy hande to kill the Lordes annoynted. The third lawe tending to the maiestie of this kingdome was that it [Page 52] was not any vncertaine and moueable state but constant and fixed in one place: it was tyed first to one tribe, namely to the tribe of Iuda & that by God speaking by the mouth of Iacob the first founder of this nation: for in his sonnes it began to be deuided into many tribes and families and so came into the forme of a people: the prophesie i [...] written, Gen. 49. The rod shall not depart from Iuda nor a law giuer, &c. Secondly it was tyed to one and the same familie, to wit, to the house of Dauid for euer and went by hereditarie right and succession in lineall discent, so that continually the sonne succeeded the father. The which lawe although it was established in the like gouernementes in other places, yet it coulde seldome take place for any long time by reason of the want of right successours. But it was heere kept in continuall force and that by the marueilous prouidence of God, who as he promised did alwaies giue to Dauid his seruaunt a sonne of his owne loynes to sitte vpon his throne. The which prouidence of GOD may especially be noted in the straunge preseruation of Ioas from the cruell handes of that monster Athalia, 2. King. 11.3. By this meanes it came to passe that this kingdom was both naturall, and in processe of time ancient, yea after a sort immortall. For the first, we need not doubt but that there was an exceeding great loue and reuerence of this king wrought in the mindes of the people, whenas they sawe that he had not obtained that place by ambition, faction, force of armes, or any other sinister or violent meanes, but was euen borne vnto them and by nature, or rather by God the [Page 53] ruler and desposer of all naturall causes, appointed and distinated to that calling. Yea also in time by this hereditarie succession, the kingdome became of great antiquitie, which addeth much to the maiestie of meane thinges, much more to those which in many other respectes are excellent. Euen as men doe ascribe a kinde no [...] onely of reuerence, but euen of religion to okes and other trees, which haue a long time kept their standing, for so in continuance of time they take so deepe roote and gather such strength as that they cannot be moued, whereas at the first they may easely be shaken downe: so kingdoms continuing long in the same stocke become firme and maiesticall, whereas being often transplanted,Long continuance of hereditarie succession made this kingdome strong and maiesticall. they are weake and contemptible and doe often fall euen in the beginning. Thus fell Abimelech his kingdome and euen this kingdome was sore shaken in the defection of the ten tribes, because the memory of Ierobaal grandfather to Abimelech a priuate and base man: and of Isai the father of Dauid was not cleane worne away, and therefore they said of the one, Iudg. 28. Who is Abimelech that we should serue him, is not he the sonne of Ierobaal: and of the other in like manner, what part haue we with Dauid the sonne of Isai, 2. Chro. 10.16. 2. Sam. 20.1. yea thus the kingdome is made after a sort immortall, when as the father doth rise againe in the sonne and so continueth for euer.What made the gouernment of the Iudges to be contemned, For hence it was that the gouernment of the iudges was so contemned of the people, because it was a newe vp-start gouernment, the iudge being lately taken from a base estate. As Gedeon & Saul confesse of themselues, [Page 54] that their kinred, family and birth was of the meanest of the people, and that therefore they were the vnfittest to beare rule, Iudg. 6.15. 1. Sam. 9.21. The last and the greatest cause of the maiestie of these kings was this, that they were the progenitors yea and the predecessors of that great Messias which was to come of the linage of Dauid, & to gouern not that land onely but the whole world, Luke. 1.32.33. the very expectation of whom made this kingdome glorious aboue measure, for that they according to the ignorance of the times and the infancie of the Church dreaming of a temporal king thought that in him all the power, riches, renowne and glory of the world should be brought to their kingdome.
Sect. XIII.
THus we see the causes of the maiesty of this kingdome: now we are to consider the meanes whereby this maiesty did shew foorth it selfe. It appeared in the glorious & stately pompe and magnificence of the whole life and behauiour, yea of all the actions of the king, and generally of all things appertaining to the kingdome. For the apparrell of the king it was such as might not onely distinguish him from his subiectes but also serue to expresse the maiesty of his state: Likewise for his whole house, the statelinesse of his palaces, the daintinesse of his fare, the number of his seruantes and retinue that all were correspondent, euen in the time [Page 55] of Dauid we may gather, 2. Sam. 19.35. where old Barzelli refuseth the kinges offer, who woulde haue kept him in his house, because hee coulde not taste the daintie meates, nor be delighted with the voyce [...] of singing men and women which were vsed in the king [...] palace. Hitherto also is to be referred the whole storie of Salomon (in whose time this glorie of the kingdome was euen in the full) the infinite prouision of his house, the glorious houses which he built for GOD and for himselfe with incredible magnificence: all which it shall not be irkesome to rehearse as they are described in the story, for so wee reade, 1. King. 4. verse. 20.22.23.26. and Chapter. 10. ver. 11.12. &c. And Salomons breade for one daie was thirtie quarters of manchette flower, and threescore quarters of meale, tenne stalled oxen, and twentie out of the pastures and a hundred sheepe beside hartes, buckes, wilde goates and capons, and hee had fortie stalles of horses for chariotes and twelue thousande horsemen. The waight of golde that came to him in one yeare was sixe hundred threescore and sixe talentes of golde,The statelinesse of this kingdome in the daies of Salomon. beside that he had of marchantes and of the marchandize of the spices and of all the kinges of Arabia and of the Lordes of the countrie. Also he made two hundred targets of beaten goulde, sixe hundred sicles of goulde wente to a target. And hee made three hundred shieldes of beaten golde: the pounde waight of golde went to one shielde, and the king put them in the house of the woode of Libanon, [Page 56] and the king made a greate seate of Iuory and couered it with the best gold and the seate had six steppes, and the top of the seate was round behinde and there were pummels on eyther side of the seate: and two Lyons stoode beside the pummels: and there stoode twelue Lyons on the steppes six on one side. There was no like worke seene in any kingdome, and all kinge Salomons drinking vessels were of golde, and likewise all the vessels of the house of the woode of Libanon were of pure golde. As for siluer it was nothing woorth in the daies of Salomon: for the kinges nauy of shippes went on the sea vnto Tharsis with the nauy of Hirams shippes, euen once in three yeares went the nauy to Tharsis and brought golde and siluer, Elephantes teeth, Apes and Peacockes. And so king Salomon exceeded all the kinges of the earth both in riches & wisedome thus farre the text. After the time of Salomō together with the sincerity of religion this maiesty of the kingdome did decrease, for in the raigne of Rehoboam both the ten tribes fell away from this kingdome, and Ierusalem was spoyled by the king of Aegypt, so that the targets of gold were turned into brasse: but vnder Iehosophat both religion and the kingdome recouered part of the ancient glorie,The maiesty of this kingdome increase and decrease as did the sinceritie of religion. for it is said, 2. Par. 18.1. that Iehophat had great riches and glory. And likewise in the raigne of Ezechi [...] we reade. 2. Chro. 32.27. that he had exceeding much riches and honour, and he gat himselfe treasures of siluer and gold, precious stones and spices, shieldes and all manner of pleasant iewels. Likewise this maiesty required that the kinges whole behauiour should haue [Page 57] in it that stately grauity which beseemeth so high a place: that he should take no meane or base action in hand but such as the perfourmance whereof might be for his glory and renowne. By this argument Dauid disswadeth Saule from persecuting him any further, saying, 1. Sam. 26.20. To whome is the king of Israel come foorth and what is this that he doth? Doth he not behaue himselfe as one who chaseth a Partridge vppe and downe in the mountaines? And for the behauiour of the kinges person Michol Saules daughter requiteth Dauid with the like, noting in him such lightnesse which was as she thought, vnbeseeming the maiesty of the king: for when she had seene Dauid daunce for ioy before the Arke; she saide, O howe glorious was the king of Israel this day, whenas he vncouered himselfe before the maydens of his seruantes, as foolish or mad men vse to doe! 2. Sam. 6.20. An finally this part of the iudgement of the kingdome and of the booke which Samuel wrote of this matter is extant. 1. Sam. 8. vers. 11. &c. where it is said, that the king will haue horsemen and chariots, yea Eunuches and women bakers, and cookes, and of his magnificence in giuing vineyardes and landes to his seruantes, the which place is not to be vnderstood of a tyrannie but of the naturall state of this kingdome as may appeare, 1. Sam. 9.20. where when Saule was carefull for his fathers asses, which were lost, Samuel telleth him that he neede not minde them seeing whatsoeuer was good, pretious, and to be desired in all Israell, it did belong in some sort to him and to all his fathers house. The which wordes are not so to be vnderstood [Page 58] as if the propertie of mens goods did belong to the king, or to any but to the right owners and possessours, but that it was nowe the parte of all the people to contribute euen of their best thinges to the kinges vses, and the setting foorth of his maiesty. Yea and that the king might lawfully exact of them thinges needfull for these purposes. This account the people did make that this gouernment woulde be verye chargeable vnto them,The kinge might lawfully exact of the people not only for necessarie vses, but for pompe & pleasure. but yet they did not sticke at the cost so they might haue their mindes fulfilled. Neyther coulde it be otherwise: for euen as a man may dwell in a base and simple house or cottage without any greate cost, but if he will needes haue a great and stately palace ouer his head, he cannot but thinke that both the building and also the maintaining of it wilbe chargeable vnto him: so it is in this case: the iudges were destitute of this maiesty, without chariots, horses, armies,An absolute Monarchie is a chargeable and costly gouernment. palaces, great retinue, costly diet and neuer put the people to any charges: but seeing they will haue a maiesticall and stately kingdome, they cannot but consider that it must be both set vp, and also preserued at their charges. Yea this opinion of the statelinesse of this kinde of gouernment was generally and as it were naturally helde of all men: and therefore Adoniah when he did affect the kingome, said thus with himselfe, nowe I will raigne and get chariots and horsemen, and fiftie men to runne before my face, 1. King. 1.5. Thus we see the maiesty of this kingdome: the which was so great as that it made the kinge to be not onely highly accounted of and [Page 59] had in greate honour and estimation of the people,The people had this gouernment in great reuerence and estimation. but also verie duetifull and after a sorte religiously obeyed, yea in trueth too much obeyed, as their often falling to idolatrie, by the commaundement and example of their kinges doth declare. There was before this time a kingdome in Israell sette vppe by the men of Sechem in the handes of Abimelech. Iudg, 9.6. but it was soone ouerthrowen and trodden vnder foote because it wanted these lawes to vpholde it. For it was not of God, but of man, not natural, but founded vpon bloudshed and violence, not auncient, but a new vpstart and destitute of all the rest of the priuileges and proppes wherewith this kingdom was endued and vpholden. But this kingdome did continue till the vtter desolation of the lande when as the whole nation was caried captiue to Babel. Yea we may well thinke that if the subiect of this kingdome which is the people it selfe, had not beene so taken away, that it would haue continued in the first institution, and according to the right order of it, euen till the comming of Christ, the which was appointed by God to be the last period of it, or rather of the outwarde and worldly shew of it:This kingdome standeth yet in Christ. for in truth it standeth yet in Christ and shal stand, til that Christ giue vp all his power of gouernment into the handes of the father. For if we set aside the defectiō of the ten tribes which was near to the beginning of this kingdome and was done by the speciall worke of God, we shall finde that this kingdome was so firmely established, that the people neuer offered to make any alteration [Page 60] of the estate: for in that they went about to make Absalon king, they were perswaded that they did right in setting vp the sonne in steade of his father being nowe stricken in yeares: yea the people did not onely continually obey this authoritie, but also had the person of the king in such estimation, that they did make more account of him, then of many thousandes of themselues. So they spake to Dauid that he should not goe any more to the battaile in his owne person, least he should put out the light, that is, all the glory and maiesty of Israell: adding further that it were much better that ten thousand of themselues should perish,The people account the kinges better then ten thousand of themselues. then that any euill shoulde befall him, 2. Sam. 21.17. And now to conclude this whole matter, we see the greatnesse both of the power and also of the maiesty of this kinde of gouernement: of both which Iacob did prophecie in the 49. of Genesis. 8. verse saying, Iuda thy brethren shall praise thee, that is, they shall magnifie and honour thee for the glory and maiesty of thy kingdome. Thy hand in the necke of thy enemies, that is, thou shalt subdue all thy enemies vnto thee: the sonnes of thy father shall bow themselues vnto thee, that is, they shall reuerence, honour, and obey thy authority: Iuda is the Lions whelpe, he hath bowed himselfe and laide him downe, that is, all his actions and behauiour shalbe full of maiesty, the which is to be seene in the Lion more then in any other beast: and who shall raise him, that is, who shall controle his doings and call him to account. He shal wash his clothes in wine, that is, he shall haue abundance yea superfluity [Page 61] of the best and most pretious things which are to be had.This gouernment doth more resemble the authority of God then any other kind doth. Thus we see both the power and also the maiesty of this kingdom: in respect of both which, we may say as it is, Act. 14.11. that Gods are come down vnto vs in the likenesse of men, that is, such a pourefull and glorious magistracie as doth after a sorte resemble the infinite po [...]er and maiesty of God.
Sect. XIIII.
HItherto we haue spoken of the iudgement or doctrine of this kingdome, as it was in respect of the people: it followeth that we declare the state of it in respect of God, and that by considering first howe this state as it hath beene described did please God: secondly whether it were a lawfull gouernment or not, and lastly how farre the power of this kingdome was subiect to God. For the first, it may seeme that God did not like this kinde of gouernment but suffered it to be established not as making for the good of the people, but rather as a punishment for their sinne: for that he was so highly offended with the people for asking a king as he himselfe doth witnesse by his prophet, Ose. 13.11. I gaue them a king in my wrath: but the trueth is that this was alwaies most pleasing and acceptable in the sight of God, yet the action of the people in making this alteration did iustly offend him and that for diuerse causes, to wit, for that by desiring a king they shewed themselues vnthankfull, diffident, proud and disoobedient. [Page 62] For the first, it was their duetie not onely to be content with what gouernment soeuer GOD did appointe for them,Why God was offended with the people asking a king. but also to thinke themselues the happiest people in the world, for that they had the glorious God of heauen and earth to be their kinge and ruler in a speciall manner. Secondly, th [...]y trusted more in a kinge then in God, thinking that the cause of all their disorders and miseries was in their gouernment: and that their king woulde certainely deliuer them from all wrong at home and bondage abroade. Whereas the cause of all their euils was in their owne wickednesse and idolatrie, in that they did forsake the true worship of God, and therefore God did forsake them, and tooke from them their iudges, in whose daies they liued in religious order and peaceable estate. And so the people according to that which is written, Iudg. 9.13.14.15. forsooke the vine, the figtree, and the oliue tree, euen God the fountaine of all blessinges, and saide to the brier come and raigne ouer vs and we will trust in thy shadowe. For to haue a king and to trust in his power doe vsually goe together, Rom. 15.12. He shal raigne ouer them and they shall trust in him. Thirdly the people in the pride of their heartes did despise the gouernment of the iudges as base and contemptible: for that howsoeuer it was mightie in the power of the spiritte of GOD, yet it had not that outwarde shew of glorie and maiestie which the stately Monarchies of other nations did carie with them. The last sinne which they committed in this action [Page 63] we call by the generall name of disobedience: for that contrarie to the expresse commaundement of God they had a crooked and peruerse desire to be transformed into all the fashions of the prophane nations amongest whome they dwelt, as in all other respectes, so also in their gouernment, and therefore they [...]id affect a kingdome which was the most vsuall kinde of gouernment. Thus we see why God was offended with this alteration of the state; as for the gouernment it selfe he did neuer mislike it, for although he suffered it to be brought in by this cooked meanes, yet he did alwaies purpose, that it shoulde be established, as may plainlie appeare by these reasons. First for that he promised Abraham. Gen. 17.6. That of his seede should come kings and nations: the which is to be vnderstood chiefly of this faithfull nation of the Iewes, although beside them others came of Abraham. Secondly Moses did foretell this, Deut. 17.God did alwaies like this gouernment, and purpose to establish it. That assoone as the people were quietly possessed of the lande of Chanaan, they would haue a king to raigne ouer them. But this doth most euidently apppeare by the prophesie of Iacob who saith, Genesis. 49. That the rodde shall not departe from Iuda nor a Lawe-giuer cease to be of his ofspringe till Silo come: and vnto him shall be the obedience of the people. Nowe this cannot be vnderstoode of the iudges, for of them all onely Othoniell was of the tribe of Iuda. Yea GOD did alwaies purpose that Christe shoulde succeede the kinges of Israell in the kingdome: for the wordes are plaine, and the euente hath shewed [Page 64] it to be true, that of the tribe of Iuda should come the Lion and the Lions whelpe, that is the stately kingdome of Israell and the continual discent thereof: yea the great lion, & the little lion that is, the Messias the great & eterna [...]l king of glory, and the temporall and earthly kings of Israel. For this cause the most plaine and euident promises which God made of the messias were deferred vntil the time of the kings & were made to Dauid who in this respect is to be counted the first king, and therefore is called, Math. 16. Dauid the King, that is, the first king of the forefathers of Christ, as hath beene alreadie touched. And lastly this gouernment may seeme in some sort to be the more acceptable to God, because it doth most liuelely represent the power and maiesty of God: for although all magistrates doe beare the image of God, yet they chiefely doe it, whose authoritie being absolute and their glorie great, come nearest to the infinite power and glorie of God. As touching the lawfulnes of this kinde of gouernement, although it be inferred of the former point (for whatsoeuer is acceptable to God, ought to be accounted lawful for vs) yet it may briefly be considered by these reasons, for that this gouernment was set vp by the appointment of God, and that by Samuel a faithful prophet, and so accounted of al Israel, yea for that it was practised by Dauid a man according to Gods owne hearte, by Salomon the glorie of the worlde, by Asa, Iehosophat and other religious kinges, by good Ezechias and by zealous Iosias who would neuer haue born this office if the kinde of gouernment had beene in any respect [Page 65] vnlawfull: the exception which is vsually taken against this kinde of Monarchie, is as touching the greatnesse of the power & maiesty of it in this manner: that howsoeuer the prophane nations of the world doe suffer tyrantes to spoyle them of their liberty and whatsoeuer they haue, yea and doe foolishly in the pride of their heartes desire such a loftie gouernment, yet that in the Church of God, it is a thing both intollerable & altogether vnlawfull that one should so haue all the power in his owne hands, that he may at his pleasure ouerthrowe all, or that a great part of the substance of the land should be imployed (to maintaine him in his iolitie) vpon sumptuous buildings, costly attyre, dainty fare, great rewardes and other thinges of the same kinde, which would serue for many necessarie vses both of the Church and of the commonwealth. For answere heereof, we are farre from going about to perswade any people which liue vnder a moderate gouernment by this wicked example of this people to affect or desire this estate, yea we leaue it to others to determine whether it be the most conuenient kinde of gouernment in respect of the Church of God, and the safe, constance and good estate of it: yet we doe not doubt to affirme that it was a lawful kinde of gouernment among the Iewes, and may lawfully be practised amongest Christians at this day. For howsoeuer some kindes of gouernment and magistracy are conuenient or inconuenient, safe or dangerous, yet this and all other kindes are to be accounted lawfull. For there is no power but from God and all the powers which are, haue [Page 66] beene instituted by God. Rom. 13.2. and especially of this gouernment now in question we may see, Daniel. 5.18.19. that God doth professe himselfe to be the author and giuer of it,God the author of kingdomes, and the setter vp of kinges. for there it is saide, O King God gaue Nabuchadnezzer thy father a kingdome: then followeth a description of the nature of a kingdom: euen maiesty, honour and glorie: he slewe w [...]ome he woulde and smote whome he would: he aduanced and debased whom he pleased. Now that we see that this kinde of gouernment was acceptable vnto God, we are in the second place to consider how farre it was subiect vnto him. For the which point it shalbe sufficient that we know that as al other powers, authorities, principalities and dominions whatsoeuer they be, whether in heauen or in earth, so also this kingdome was wholy & absolutely subiect to God and to his power, and bound to obey his will and commaundementes, and to set forth his glory in all things as it is written in the 17. of Deutronomie, that the king whensoeuer he were made, shoulde take an excript of the law of God from the priest, and meditate thereon day and night that he may keepe it without declining to the right hand or to the left. Yea the state of this kingdome did depend wholly vppon God, and was helde by condition of obeying him: so that as a tenant or vassall doth holde his landes and liuing of his liege Lorde or King vpon this condition,The kinge held his kingdome as from God, and was subiect to his will and worde. that he shall doe him seruice and homage and to be at his commaunde the which if he doe not, he doth forthwith forfaite his title and dispossesse himselfe of all: in like manner this kingdome did holde of God by condition of obeying him. This [Page 67] lawe of the kingdome Samuel doth diligently teach- 1. Sam. 12.23. if ye doe wickedly then shall you perish both you and your king. The which punishment was executed vpon Saul, Salomon and the whole race of Idolatrous kinges in the destruction of the kingdome and nation.
Sect. XV.
HItherto we haue declared the doctrine of the kingdome of Israell, the which was the first thing we tooke to speake of. Nowe we come to the actions of Samuel mentioned in the wordes of the text. Whereof the first is, that he speake this doctrine of the people, and that, no doubt, for this end that they might knowe the state of that gouernment,This example of Samuel teaching the people the state of the kingdome, is to be followed by the ministers of Gods word. what dueties they were to performe to their kinges & in what manner they were to be subiect, & to obey him. In whose example al the ministers of the worde may marke their duetie that they ought with all care and diligence to teach the people to obey the ciuill power, to honor, loue & fear it, to be ready to impart that which God hath bestowed vpō thē, on the maintenance of it, and finally to performe al those dueties which the law of God, or of man doth require at their hands. Thus Paul writeth to Titus, Nothing better beseeming Christians then due subiection to magistates. Chap. 3.2. Warne and put al Christiās in mind that they be subiect to rule, to obey the magistrats & to be ready to euery good work: for there is nothing that doth better beseem a Christiā mā or people then harty loue & ready obedience to the magistrate, [Page 68] comming not of constraint, and feare of punishment, but of conscience: neyther is there any thing that doth more disgrace the profession of Christ and lay it open to the reproches of infidels and wicked men then disloyall behauiour to magistrates, especially to kinges and great princes to whome all lawes both diuine and humane require that a g [...]at measure of honour, obedience and maintenance be performed. T [...]e second action of Samuel is, that he wrote this doctrine of the kingdome in a booke, and that for perpetuity that it might be preserued safe in time to come, and so serue for the instruction of the ages following. As touching this booke it perished with many others written by the prophets and holy men of God, and that by the negligence of the priestes and people, yet there is a summe or compendious abstract of it, saued from the iniurie of the times and the publike calamities which befalling this nation did bury many notable monumentes. The which we haue recorded, 1. Sam. 8. verse. 10. and so forth to the 19. out of the which place, this doctrine which hath beene deliuered in this short treatise of the power and maiesty of the kingdom may be gathered: the words are these. Now therefore hearken vnto their voyce: howbeit yet testifie vnto them and shew them, A compendious abstract of the state of the kingdome of Israel. the manner of the king that shall raigne ouer them. Hee will take your sonnes, and put them to his chariots, and make them Captaines ouer thousandes, and ouer fifties, and will set them to care his ground and to gather in his haruest, and to make instruments of warre and thinges that serue for his chariots. And he wil take your daughters, and make them apoticaries, cookes, and bakers, and [Page 69] he shall take your fieldes and your vineyardes, and your best oliue trees, and giue them to his seruantes, and he shall tak [...] the tenth of your seede, and of your vineyardes, and giue to his Eunuches, and to his seruantes, and he shall take your men-seruantes, and maid-seruantes, and the chiefe of your young men, and your asses, and put them to his worke, he will take the tenth of you [...] sheepe and ye shalbe his seruantes. The second action giueth vs this instruction, that according to the example of Samuell, a [...]l Christians ought to desire, and they to whome God hath giuen giftes fitte for this purpose,Care to be had of posterity. by all meanes to endeauour, that they may profit the Church not onely whilest they l [...]e, but also after their death: by leauing behinde them those thinges which may further the edification of it. Thus haue the p [...]ophets, Apostles and holy men of God done from time to time, whose writinges doe testifie their care, diligence, and paines taken in this behalfe. The which as we doe now inioy to our vnspeakeable profite and comfort, so ought we to be stirred vp by their example to performe the like duetie to others: euen as we commend the carefull foresight of those men, who as they eate the fruite of the trees which their forefathers did plant, so they plant other trees which may serue for the vse of their posterity. For although no man can hope, that his labours should be in any me [...] sure so profitable to the Church as the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles are, who had the extraordinarie giftes of prophecie and reuelation, and were directed by the continuall assistance of Gods spirit, yet the ordinarie gifts of knowledge and wisedom which [Page 70] God hath giuen to be perpetuall in his Church, wil helpe forward the building of it, chiefly in the ministerie of the word, and also by the meanes of writing, whereof there will be a necessarie vse, as long as the Church endureth not onely for the interpretation of the word of God but also for the scanning of controuersies, the confuting of heresies▪ the reproouing of vices the which will continually be new and fresh in the Church. The last action of Samuel is that he laid this booke before the face of the Lorde, that is, in the place of Gods worship, where he was so present that he might as it were be knowen and discerned there, euen as one man is knowen from an other by his face. This Samuell did for this end, that God might be both a witnesse of▪ his faithfulnesse in teaching the people their due [...]ie in this behalfe, and also a maintainer of that [...]state, the which was established by the will of God: yea a reuenger of all disorders and of all disloyalty which should be any way committed against the state. And so we neede not doubt but that God doth watch with the eye of his prouidence ouer kings and princes after a speciall manner, vouchsafing to them who are faithfull and Godly a great measure of wisedome and of all graces of the spirit meete for so high a calling, yea and doth seuerely punish the resistance, c [...]ntempt & disgrace offered to those princes which are so carefull to serue him, to set forth his glory and to build his Church as they ought to be. Lastly to conclude this whole treatise, we learne by these two last actions that as Samuel howsoeuer he did greatly mislike the alteration of the former state and the setting [Page 71] vp of this new gouernment, yet whenas it was once by the permission of God and the importunitie of the people established, he did labour that it should continue for euer, for the which purpose he did both write the doctrine of it in a booke and also laide the saide booke before the Lorde: so we doe labour to continue that gouernment which is in force in that place or country where we liue, although we doe perhaps imagine yea & perswade our selues that we could finde out a better forme of gouernment,Alteration of gouernment in any common wealth troublesome and dangerous. & which should be voyde of those in conueniences which we see in the present state. For as the wise men of this world teach vs, there is nothing more troublesome, dangerous, yea pernitious to any people then the alteration of the forme of gouerment which is in force, and as the wisdome of God speaketh in the scripture, no [...]ing is more hainous & odious in the sight of God and man then to seeke the subuersion of magistrates, states and kingdomes.