A TRVE AND CERTAINE RELATION Of a STRANGE-BIRTH, which was borne at Stone-house in the Parish of Plimmouth, the 20. of October. 1635.

TOGETHER with the Notes of a Ser­mon, preached Octob. 23. 1635. in the Church of Plimmouth, at the interring of the sayd Birth.

By Th. B. B. D. Pr. Pl.

LONDON, Printed by Anne Griffin, for William Russell in Plimmouth. 1635.

[portrait of conjoined twins]
Heb. 11. 3.‘Being dead, yet speaketh.’

AS the Word of God, so the Workes of God are for our Doctrine and instructi­on. The works of Creation teach us, saith Saint Paul, Gods eternall power andRom. 1. [...]0. God-head. The works of his providence are not behind hand with us: and there­fore saith the Holy Prophet, Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. True this is inPsal. 19. 2. the ordinary and common workes of providence: But much more remarkable in those that are extraordinary, when either the course of Nature is hindred, as the Sea and Sunne stopt in the midst of their Carrier: or altered,Exod. 14. Ios. 10. as when the Sunne went backe-ward in the daies of He­zechiah. Touching which, saith the Psalmist, Hee hath made his wonderfull workes to be remembred; or as thePsal. 111. 4. words stand in the Originall, and the Greeke translation. A memoriall hath he made to his wonderful works, id est. ZeKeA GNaSaH LeN [...]PhLeAo Thall. [...]. Hee hath ordained and commanded that they should be remembred; Good reason, that where God with his fi [...]ger pointeth forth something in speciall to the sonnes of men, they should follow it with the Eye of the body, till the eye of the soule, viz. the understanding spirit have thence received some instruction.

Not onely the other Creatures: but also the Sonnes of men are otherwhiles made the object of these wonder­full workes of God: Or if you had rather call it the sub­ject [Page 10] matter, on which he stampeth the markes of his Pro­vidence, either in hindering, or in altering the Ordinary course of Nature, sometimes in the conception, sometimes in the births of our expected and desired issue.

Conception, I count the naturallConceptio est actio uter [...], cum [...]ris [...]t famina s [...]mon foecun­dum ab coexcipitur, misce [...]r▪ [...]ovetur, ejusque vis ad propris [...] munu [...] exequendum exc [...]atur Dan. Sennert. Med. li. 4. part. 2. Sect. 4. cap. 4. and proper worke of the wombe, in receiving, retaining, and ripening the seed for the Birth. The wombe is by the hand of God, sometimes closed up, that it receiveth not, as in the case of Abimilechs family. Gen. 20. sometimes opened or rather loosened, that it retayneth not, as in the case of Abortive and untimely births. Sometimes weakened, that it ripeneth not the birth, either not at all, or at least not within the just time. And all these doe teach us the pre­senceVide Se [...]nertum capite de partutardo. Qui ex historiis consirmat partum nonnun­quam differri ad mensem 13 14. 15. 18. 20 23. 24. Hae [...] rara (in­quit) et pene miraculosa sunt; acciduntque procul dubio ob se­men debil [...], uter [...]que calorem [...]anguidum, quib [...] de causis et saetus tardius absolvitur, et ex­p [...]ltr [...] facul [...] lang [...]et. of Gods Providence. Well may wee say, The hand of God hath beene there. It is hee that thus hath hinde­red the worke of the wombe, and withheld the blessing of a good Con­ception. So for the birth.

Birth I must call that which properly and from the La­tine we might call Parturition. This doth God by the hand of his speciall providence hinder sometime in part, sometime in whole: So that whereasPartus prater-naturalis est, triplex. Di [...]icilis, Nul [...]us, et Caesareus. Difficilis, ut in Agrippis. Quibus nomen indi. tum est (Authore Gellio No­ctium A [...]i [...]arum lib. 16. ca, 16 eo quod in [...]sc [...]ndo, non caput, sed pedes primi extiterans, s [...]il, [...]t Agripp [...] dicantur ab [...]gritis di [...]e et pedibus: Cum potius ab agrit [...]dine partus; qui non tantum [...]t ex pedibus, sed ex [...]a [...]ibus; praeser [...]im tamen ex mole corporis obvtrsa▪ et exitum ambi [...]nte; pro [...]t patet ex Sonner to cap▪ de partu difficili prater­naturali. Partus Nullus dicitur, quoties infant excludi nequeat; frustraque con [...]t [...]r misera par­turi [...]ns s [...] ipsam o [...]ere suo libe­rare et exp [...]dire, [...]ortu [...] nimi­rum foet [...]s, qui nisi vel medica­mentis expe [...]atur, vel Chirurgi opera exera [...]atur, mortem e [...] mis [...]riam ma [...]ri [...]tatur. Par­tus Casareus Casari nomen fe­cit. Ille enim qui primus Cae­s [...]ri [...] no [...] adeptus est, ab e [...] dictus fertur, quod c [...]so matris utero natus fu [...]rit. G [...]s [...]res quod ex utero excisi sunt, nom [...]antur; ipsaque illa actio dicitur partus Caesareus, Ex his pl [...]riq [...]e mor­tui; nonnulli vivi; idque (quod rar [...] accidit) matre superst [...]te et revalescente. all times of the womans Travell and labour are full of sorrow, yea (as the Philosopher saith, Aristot. de Historia A [...]imaliu [...], Lib. 7. cap. 9 and the Scripture it selfe in part doth confirme the same) moreful of difficulty and danger than any other creatures (an evident demonstration [Page 11] of the Hand of God, visiting the first sinne of our Grandmother E [...]ah, upon all the sex) whereas I say all times are full of sorrow, of feare and frightfulnesse; some doe re­ceive an increase and multiplicati­on, by such accidents supervenient, and unexpected dangers of births not capable of deliverance till God by the hand of speciall Art vouch­safe his gracious helpe, and good assistance. Of these therefore, as of the former, well may wee say, Digitus dei, It is the finger of God that hath beene here, and manifested his presence by hindering the com­mon and ordinary course of Nature in the Birth of the Wombe.

As in hindering, so also in altering and changing the course of Nature, doth God call man to an obser­vation of his Providence: Nay heere more than in any thing else doth hee shew forth his workes of wonder: understand me still to speake of the Conception and of the Births of the sonnes of men. What variety of strange births doe wee see and heare of. Strange births wee call them: more properly, wee might terme them strange Conceptions: for what the wombe in Con­ception formeth, that is not usually altered in the birth, What varietie (I say) of strange-birthes doe wee see and heare of? Strange in the quantitie of Stature. This is sometimes Giant-like; other­whiles Dwarfish and Pigmey-like. Sometimes be­yond, sometimes beneath and short of the ordinary, usuall and common stature of mankinde; and as it thus falleth out in respect of the whole body▪ so som­times in the parts. One or 2 parts of the body, being of a different proportion; bigger or less [...]r than the rest. stature: strange in the Number of parts. The strangenesse here is in defect or excesse. Defect, when one or both hands or feet are wanting: Such was that woman which wee saw heere the last yeere, who wanted hands, and supplied the want of them in many particulars by her feete. Excesse of number: Such was that Gy­ant mentioned, [...] Sam. 21 20. who had on every hand sixe fingers, and on every foote sixe toes, foure and twenty in number. Hitherto referre those whom the Greeks do call [...]; such was Hermaphrodi [...], the sonne of Mercury and Uenus, i [...] we may give cre­dit to the [...]tation and composition of his name. number of parts: Strange in the [Page] Multiplication of severall births is rare▪ [...]wins are not frequent in our colder climat, much lesse the multiplication of Birth [...], yet such we finde recorded, See Se [...]nertus cap. de G [...]m [...]llorum generatione, who out of Aristotle, Pliny, and some Moderne Authors d [...]t [...] sh [...]w the certain [...]y of this Notorious and in the mouth of every man is that story of Margar [...], Sist [...]r to Earle Floris the fourth (as Heilin relateth it, writing of Holland) who being of the age of two and forty yeeres, brought forth at one birth three hun­dred three score and five children, halfe o [...] them males, hal [...]e females, and the [...]dd one an Hermaphro­di [...]. They were christened in two B [...]sons at the Church of [...]sdunen, by Guido Suffragan to the Bi­shop of Vtrecht, who n [...]m [...]d the Males Iohns, and the Females Elizabeths: all which immediatly after died, and with them their mother: the Ba [...]ons are yet to be seene in the aforesaid Church. Thus farre He [...]lin▪ This miracle, or miraculous accident befell her (say some) as the just hand of God upon her, for that when a certaine poore woman having two children hanging at her breasts, asked of her an alm [...] shee bitterly upbraided the woman with wheredome, for that shee had both those at one birth, adding, that it was not possible for a woman to conceive two births at once, except by fornication. A good warning doubt­lesse to all [...]ash headed censurers, who spare not to sp [...]ake of others at their owne pleasure. Multiplication: strange in the Concorporation of births, is almost miraculous, tha [...] two should be ioyned into one. Yet su [...] there have beene, as appeareth by Landulphu [...], in that answer which hee gave to the question. An et quo­modo monstra sint baptisanda whether at all, and if so, then how monstrous and mishapen births are to be baptized A question, that if thes [...] incorporated Twins had beene borne alive and lived to Bap­tisme might have put the Minister to his bookes how to proceed in the case. The answer to the que­stion is this: Si perpend [...]ntur du [...]s habere animas, n [...]t pote duo capita, quatuor brachia, quatuor pedes, du [...]s spina [...] in dorse, & hujusuiodi▪ tunc baptis [...]tur quilibet per se, & intingatur in loco quilibet per se, id est, If you perceive that they have two soules, as thu [...]: That they have two heads, foure armes, foure feete, two b [...]cks and backe-bones, and the like: Then l [...]t each of them be baptized by himselfe, &c. Of two con­corporated and joyned backe to backe, wee reade. The story is remembred in Rod [...]ricu [...] à Castro, a Phy­sician of speciall note throughout all Europe▪ as the Title of his Booke doth stile him. He, in Lib. [...]. de Morbis mulierum, cap. 6. comming to speake of mon­strous births, m [...]ko [...]h five severall kindes of them (as also before him had Andreas La [...]rentius in his Histo­ria Anatomica, lib. 8. Qu. 14) more particularly hee maket [...] the third kinde to be of them that are defective or redundant. Quo numero, saith hee, comprehenduntur duo illi qui tergo uno pro duob [...] perfungentes, moribus tamen diversi, viginti annos vi [...]erunt, & cum vnus mortem obiret, alter tamd [...] superv [...]xit, quoad socij ac germam putr [...]lagin [...] fui [...] extinct [...]. Two, saith hee, that were joyned backe to backe, and it seeweth as contrary in their maners, as in their lookes. They lived twenty yeeres, and when one of them died, till the putrefaction of that body which could not be separated, did prove the destruction of the survivour. But no mention doe any of the fore­named Authors make of such a birth as this of ours: so that it is likely that they had heard of none such. But proceed. Concorporation of severall births, but a­bove all most strange in Quality and kinde: The alteration of this, is of all other the most strange, and indeed monstrous: whether of the whole, or of some part. Alteration of the whole kinde wee reade of: Beasts that have brought forth mankinde births, and women bri [...]ish shapes. Andreas Angelus de Mirabi [...]bus mund [...] in hi­storia Anni 1597. In April [...] (inquit) Ba [...]geis in Hispa­nia in [...]ditum q [...]oddam Monstr [...]m pro [...]u [...] mundu [...]: quod ex m [...]orum ad varios scriptu illi [...] et Venetiis c [...]r [...]ò constat liter [...]. Ibi enim vacca, qu [...]dam du [...] vivos et integr [...]s omnino homines masculum et faemi [...]am enix [...] est in lucem Sennertus, cap de monstris (so also Gastro and Lau­rentius ibidem. Interdum accidit ut [...]oemin [...] varia mon­stra viv [...]ntia [...]t animal [...] praeter et contra naturam pro­ducant. Serpentes, cane [...], et alia animalia, vel foetu [...] bru­torum partes habentes, et ali [...]s eosque variis modis mon­stros [...] geni [...]os fuisse è Lyc [...]t [...]ene, et aliis qu [...] de prodigiis et monstris scripserunt, videre est. Neque opera pretium est historias illas huc adducer [...]. Alteration of pa [...]: Ex Theatro Historic [...], doth Doctor Beard relate this History. A certaine Noble­man used every Lords day to goe on hunting in ser­mon time; which impiety the Lord punished with this iudgement. Hee caused his wife to bring forth a childe with an head like a dogge. That seeing he preferred his dogges before the service of God, hee might have one of his owne getting to make much of. Hitherto referre such strange births as have some [...]berous exc [...]escenscies. See one recorded by Castro De Natura Mulierum, li. 3. ca II▪ quod habebat corn [...] in copi [...]e alas dna [...], &c. Here in this towne not many years agoe, when women layed their haire forth upon wires, a child was born which had on the head (as I am credibly informed) grissels growing in the shape and fashion of those attires and dres­sings. Castro addeth, Qui conceptus etsi à causis natura­libus continga [...]t, tamen [...]ou [...] si [...]e Dei providentia [...]ri credendum est, pro puniendis, et mon [...]dis hominibus, [...]s­den [...]qus arcend [...]s ab [...]ssranata [...] turp [...] libidine. quality & kind altered and changed. All these, but espe­cially this later sort, which alter the qua­litie and kinde, the Latines call Monstra á monstrando, quia monstrantur, I would adde, ut monstrent. They are shewed that they may shew the speciall handy­worke of God, and though, peradven­ture deade, yet speake, and tell the forgetful world, that God himselfe hath a speciall hand in for­ming and featuring the births conceived in the wombe. Here by the way, let mee touch upon a case of conscience, or two. Whether Monsters and mishapen births [Page 13] may lawfully be car­ried up and downe the country for [...]ights to make a gaine by them? Whether the Births being once dead, may be kept from the grave for the former ends? Whether the parents of such births may sel them to another. ForThese two also are mentioned by A­ristotle in his Pro­blemes. Cap. De Monstris. my part I would be loth to prejudice the better and morall judgements of any. But to speak plainly, I do make scruple of the first, and therfore much more of the two later cases. For if not living they are to be prostituted to the covetousnesse of any; much lesse being dead, when the grave calls for the bo­dies of all Christian births: the grave, I say, wherein they are to be laid up: that therein they may lay downe the present dishonor, and thence [Page 14] be raised againe in glory. And if the pa­rents may not doe this; how much lesse may they deliver it over to another? But you will say to mee, suppose them living, why may they not be used to this end, bee­ing fit for none im­ployment? My rea­sons▪ are these. Our delight is to be mea­sured by our desires, nor doe I see it lawfull to delight in what may not be desi­red. And who would desire a mishapen Birth, to be the is­sue of his owne body? Adde this, all Crosses call for Hu­miliation: and where that is expected, I see not how there can bee place either for profit or pleasure to bee thought upon:

But to returne againe to what wee had in hand. These Births (as I said) though dead, yet speake and preach to the world the present hand of God in the wombe of the mother.

Adsaetus formati­onem requiruntur tria: sc. (1) Ipsum semen [...]cundum utr [...]us­que parentis. (2) Sang [...]is mater­ [...]s [...]d nutriend [...] [...]um. (3) Vterus matris bene constitu [...]us, qui [...]men concep­tum [...]ovcat, [...]i [...]sque lat [...]n [...]m vim ex­ci [...]t: supponitur enim [...]m quan­dam activam late­re in semine (dico autem [...]men illud quod Gr [...]ci [...] sc [...]semen ex utro (que) parente mi [...]um) supponitur [...]nquam [...]m quandam late­re, quam [...]c [...]us mater [...]us suo calo­re excitat ad actio­nem suam peragen­dam: H [...]um trium siquid deest: siquid d [...]bile sit, aut in [...]r­di [...]atum, hinc [...]it (inquit Philosophus ut vitiosa sequatur conformat [...]o [...]o [...]us, [...]n [...] sal [...]m [...] arti [...]m In all these accidents and occasions the Philosophers (and physitians also who build upon the ground of Philo­sophy, nor can well subsist without them) they I say would attribute all these impeditions and alterations of Nature to secondary causes: either internall, as the defectivenesse or excesse of seminall materialls; or externall, as the dul­nesse of the formative facultie, or indisposednesse of the Vessells, or strength of Conceit or Imagina­tion.

[Page 13]The Astrologer may adde another cause, powerfull▪ in his opinion, to pervert and overthrow the good inten­tions of Nature, sc. the constellations of the planets, and configuration of their aspects. And happily they may pitch upon some reasons for the coalition of these two twinnes into one: nor doe we deny but the Philosopher may bee allowed in these his conjectures: nor may hee seeme to shoot beside the marke, that should ascribe it to some ac­cident, colliding and dashing these two new-formed Em­bryons in the wombe, casting them so one upon the o­ther, as that the contiguity and overmuch closenesse of their bodies caused the aforesaid coalition: so have wee seene two trees over closely leaning one upon another grow into one, and covered with one barke. The Philo­sopher, I say, may seeme to speake reason (not so the A­strologer, at least in mine Opinion.) Onely he and others must bee intreated to looke higher, and to take notice of the speciall hand of God, whose worke alone it is to sort and compound the activities of secondary causes; that what by the blessing of God might have beene otherwise, is now thus disposed of for ends best knowne to him­selfe.

This is the conclusion which Religion teacheth: and which it becommeth mee as a Divine to put you in minde of. The Astrologer is taught to say, Astraregunt homines. The influence of the Starres doe rule the Actions of the sonnes of men. But the Christian knoweth that regit astra Deus, God over-ruleth the starres. So that if wee should grant an influence in the planets, and a power in the Con­stellations: yet farre be it from us to account it fatall, and inalterable: No we know that God sitteth in the Heavens, and doth whatsoever hee will. David in the Psalmes as­cribeth to his hand the framing of his body and members in the wombet. Thine hands have made me and fashioned [Page 14] me. Thou hast covered mee in my mothers wombe. Thine eyes Psa. 119. 73. Psa. 139. 13 16. (saith hee) did see my substance yet beeing unperfect, and in thy booke all my members were written, which in continu­ance were fashioned: or (as it is in the Margent) all of them written, what dayes they should be fashioned, when as yet there was none of them. To him therefore belongeth the disposing of the materialls and shaping of the Birth: Now then, is God so tyed to his materialls, that if there be too much for one, or too little for two complete and perfect features, hee can neither detract nor multiply? Must his worke bee cut off with what the Philosopher [...]aith of Na­ture, Intendit quod optimum, facit tamen id quod potest: that is, Nature intendeth perfection, but beeing hindered doth what she can?

Let no man therefore taxe me of any excesse in religious thoughts, or count it overmuch curiositie, if I propound to you an observation or two, grounded upon this and the like occasions. Each Comet (as experience hath taught men) is in its kinde Doctrinal, and blaseth forth something or other worthy our observation. Nec in vanum toties ar­sere Cometae: seldome are those super-terrestriall blazes kindled in vaine. Men do commonly count them praenun­cios Tully, Lucan. Iosep. de bello Iud. lib. 7. ca. 12. belli et calamitatum, fore-runners of some imminent ca­lamities, and therefore doe call upon one another to ap­pease the wrath of God, by fasting and Humiliation.

I shall not therefore I hope, transcend the limits of my calling, nor wrong the providence of God, if I take liber­ty to say, touching this strange-birth, which God hath cau­sed to blaze here amongst us, and from us, to the whole Countrey, to say of it, as the Apostle saith of the bloud of Abel; being dead, it yet speaketh. What did or doth the bloud of Abel speake, but the irreversible wrath of God against Cain, & in him against all wilfull and malicious per­secutours of religious persons? I doe not say, this speaketh [Page 15] so bitter things; but yet it speaketh something in common with the rest of strange and mishapen Births: and if I deceive not my selfe over-much, something in pecu­liar by it selfe: so then it speaketh two things, perhaps more, but two I pitch upon, not averring them both spoken with the same evidence, but both truly: and which is more, seasonably.

First then this, and all monstrous & misfeatured Births,Observa. 1. speake this: That it is a singular Mercie of God, when the Births of the Wombe are not mis-formed: when they receive their faire and perfect feature. A Lesson truly worth the noting in this forgetfull Age: Mercies that are ordinarie wee swallow; and take small notice of them: Such a worke as this causeth us to see what diffe­rence there is bet wixt comlinesse and deformity: betwixt Perfection and Imperfection in the Body. Doth any make scruple of what I say? Let that man consider the discomfort of Deformitie: How lyable it is daily to ex­probration through the evill custome of wicked men, more ready to cast it in the teeth, than condole or com­miserate, if God hath stampt a deformity upon the Bo­die.

Know wee not that the members of the Bodie are the Organs and Instruments of the Soul, in the Service of God and man? Defect or excesse must needs breed griefe, be­cause it createth trouble. Consider wee this birth, thus double-membred, to have seene them lying upon the table, to see them deciphered upon the paper might happily be thought a sight not much unpleasant: But let your ima­gination give them life, and tell mee how uncomfortable, yea burthensome must they be to others, yea and to them­selves: when as though two, yet so neere incorporated, that the one cannot helpe the other. How should they eat, sleep, walke, sit, or satisfie nature, but with much in­cumbrance. [Page 16] Is it then discomfort to have a marke of de­formity or dis-advantage cast upon the Births of the Womb? And is it not a singular Mercie to have them born compleat in shape and feature? Doubtlesse it is.

All reason therefore is that this Mercie of God unto us in the issue of our Loins should be acknowledged with all thankefulnesse. If other Mercies, why not this? The Husbandman, when hee hath his Corne and Wine increa­sed, when housed: The Merchant, when his Venture is returned: The Owner when his Ship is arrived, and both have made a good voiage: If there be any religion dwelling in their brests, will in a solemne manner confesse before the Sonnes of men the loving kindnesse of the Lord. When women have received safe deliverance from the great paines and perills of Child-birth, the Church doth call them (and surely it had need to call them) to give hearty thanks to God: And ought not this also to be remembred, That the Children borne give hope of Comfort to their Parents? Hope I say, that a faire and well-featured Body may be the comfortable house and habitation of an Holy soule? Doubtlesse it ought: Doth not David intimate so much in the afore-mentioned Psalme, when hee saith, I [...]sal. 139. 14. will praise thee, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Mervailous are thy Workes, and that my Soule knoweth right-well.

Know wee not that God hath just cause to blast every birth of ours, if he would be extreme? Partly, in respect of the abuse of the Bed; which, though hee hath sancti­fied to the use of man by the benediction of the Church, that so in the sober use thereof every one should possesse his Vessell in sanctification and honour; yet is it too often riotously and wantonly abused. Partly, I say, for these Abuses, but specially in respect of that Originall corrup­tion which cleaveth to the Fruit of the womb, even from [Page 17] the first conception, as the Psalmist sheweth. From this gilt and filth not one of all the Race of Adam is exemp­ted.Psal. 51. 5. No sooner doe we receave a Being, but it is ac­companied with sinfulnesse: In which respect, who can denie, but God might justly blast the body with deformity? Which if hee doe not when hee might, is it not a favour, and so to be acknowledged? Wee acknowledge it a spe­ciall favour to the Soule (as it is reason wee should) that God doth exempt any from that common damnation, which is due to all by Adams transgression: And is it not to be confessed a Mercie to the body? For why? VVhen the body doth want its perfect feature, when the Soule doth want the exercise of wit and reason, more or lesse: Is not this an effect of Sinne, and so to bee accounted: Doth God in this any thing more than what Iustice doth allow? Shall wee say it is an act of his absolute Domi­nion? I trow not: VVhat is justly done to some, is it not mercie, not to doe to others? Yes (my Dearely beloved) it is Mercie, free and undeserved Mercie: O that in this also, as in other things, I say, O that men would therfore praise the Lord for his goodnesse, and for his wonderfull VVorks to the Sonnes of men!

Contrarily, when the Hand of Iustice hath found any out, when any birth of ours is brought into the world misformed, and mis-featured: If God hath (as it were) spit in the face, and laid the black-finger of Deformity upon the body, ought it not to bee entertained with sor­row of Heart, and Humiliation? Hath God written in great Letters the guilt of Sin, and in a deformed body drawn a resemblance of the Soules deformity; drawn it (I say) so; that others may see and know, that wee also are defiled in his sight? and shall wee not blush to heare it, to see it thus cast in our teeth, and laid be­fore us?

[Page 18]This for the Parties: but is this all? Is it nothing to you all that passe by, or that come to see? Mee thinkes It should: Can you, any of you, wash your hands in Inno­cencie? are not you also Sinners in the sight of God? VVhat can you alledge, why this might not have beene yours? Did you prevent it by prayer? I trust you will hereafter: and acknowledge the justnesse of their Devo­tion, who remember women with child: but happily you have not hitherto thought upon it: If so; If God might have throwne the tower of Siloam upon your heads also, if set a marke of his displeasure upon your births, and yet hath not done it; will you not see and say, The Lord hath done great things for us? Lord, what am I, that thou hast spared mee? am I more holy, lesse sinfull than my neighbour? No, no: It is thy free Mercie and undeser­ved Favour, Oh inlarge my heart to praise thy Name.

Heere then see and bewaile the iniquity and irreligion of this our Age, at least of numbers in the same. The common sort make no further use of these Brodigies and Strange-births, than as a matter of wonder and table-talk: looke upon them with none other eyes, than with which they would behold an African monster, a mishapen beast. It was not thus in the better Ages of the world. VVee reade in the ninth Chapter of Saint Iohn: that the Disci­ples, when they saw the man that was borne blind, they come to our blessed Savior, with Quis peccavit? Mr Who hath sinned? See the Religion of those times: They lookt upon sinne as the cause of defective or redundant births. Truth indeed, our Saviour answereth: Neither this man, nor his parents. By which Speech of Christ, wee must not thinke that they are excused from all sinne: doubt­lesse his parents had sinned; and conceived him in sinne, else had not this beene cast upon him: No place for de­fects and deformities in the state of Innocence. But why [Page 19] God should take the forfeiture in this, rather than in his Neighbour, this was meerely Ex Dei bene-placit [...], the good pleasure of God, who had in this a purpose to prepare and make way for the glory of Christ in curing the man.

The same happily might bee said in these occasions whereof wee speake: To the Question, Quis pecca­vit; Who hath sioned? happily Christ (who was ac­quainted with the Counsels of his Father) might an­swer; Neque hic, neque parentes, Neither he, nor his Parents: Not to exempt them from sinne altogether, but to teach us, that some other end & purpose God had beside the visitation of their sin: (though that also we find somtimes to bemanifested, when God by such occasions doth awaken the coscience to confesse secret and unbewailed sins) beside, I say, the visitation of sin: Somtimes to discover the Atheism, Irreligion of many, perhaps also their Covetousnesse, who would rather make a benefit of such births, & instead of Humiliation for a Crosse, teach the parents to account such births for blessings, which doe prove so profitable. Some­times to prompt unto the Ministerie a word of ex­hortation needfull for the present state of the peo­ple: A meditation which happily his text would not afford him. Ex. gr. This Lesson, as you see, is by this occasion prompted to me, presented to you: That you remember hereafter, to acknowledge it as a Mercie: when Children come into the world well-featured, the members of their body in a due proportion apt­ly each to other corresponding, neither defective, nor redundant: To bewaile it as a crosse from God, when it is otherwise: that so penitencie may provide a Remedie, either of the deformity by the hand of Man; or of the discomfort by the stroke of Death. [Page 20] This Lesson, I say, is now presented to you, and I trust will bee remembred by you: And if so; the An­swer to the Question may goe on as it is in the words of our Saviour. Neither this man, nor his parents, but that the works of God should bee made manifest in him.

To winde up this first observation in a word, I no­ted the religion of the Disciples: they▪ looke up to sinne as to the cause of Gods Hand: nor shall it mis­become us to doe the like: provided alway, that it bee (what they forgot) in our owne occasion rather than in anothers. Doe I suffer? Let mee say, Lord, I have sinned; Thou art just. Doth another suffer? Let mee say, Lord, thou art mercifull to me: this case might have beene mine. Blessed bee thy Name for ever.

Something long have I stood upon this, because I am sure this is a Lesson, which all monstrous and mis­shapen births, though dead, yet speake for the In­struction of the Living: I will dispatch the other more briefely, which may seeme to bee peculiar to this one in respect of the shape thereof.Observat. 2.

The twinnes you see are males; brothers, had they beene borne alive. To love as brethren, is the duty of Christians: a Duty frequently remembred by the Apostles, and powerfully pressed. To love, is to have one soule in two bodies; One, not so much by union of essence as by combination of Affection: And lo, here a fit resemblance of this mutuall duty: As fit, as lively almost as can be devised: Here are all the parts and members of Consultation, and operation for two persons; onely here is one body, one brest, one belly: the brest the seat of the heart, the belly of the bowells: One I say, not in the Identity of sub­stance; [Page 21] but in the conglutination of externall parts from brest to belly: whether one heart, one liver, one community of Intestines, is more than wee could see; though all reason indeed giveth them to be two throughout in all parts: yet you see, so two in one, that had they lived to the yeares of expression, wee might well have expected from them united hearts, intire affections, and more than Sympathie, each to other, as to himselfe. Surely, these are not more neere [...]y conjoyned in brest and belly, than Christians ought to be in heart & affection. These two were one body; Christians are one spirit: though severall bodiesCor. 12. 13▪ and soules, yet one and the same spirit diffused into all, to enlive and quicken all. Nor would it have beene more prodigious for these Twinnes (suppose they had lived to bee men) to have quarrelled and contested one against another: than it is for Christi­ans to quarrell and contend, specially to live in the minde of irreconciliation. To these Twinnes (had they quarrelled) a man might have sayd, you are one body: To Christians a man may well say, You are one spirit: why doe you wrong one to another? Was that an Argument in all reason fit to compound the supposed differences of these? And shall not this bee able to perswade peace, nay love among Christians? Mee thinketh it should: Nay, I am sure, if this doe not prevaile, the faultie person shall one day smart for it: perhaps when Repentance for it will come too late.

Wel, I have now acquainted you with my thoughts. I have shewed to you, how this Birth, though dead, yet speaketh: Truth it is, Faith alone hath eares to heare these Lessons, these Instructions: Nature is deafe, and Reason dull in these occasions: A brutishPs. 92. 6. [Page 22] man knoweth not; neither doth a foole understand: Faith quickneth the Vnderstanding to apprehend: the Will to believe: the Affections to take pleasure in these Meditations.

Which Faith, since it is the gift of God, let us now turne our selves to him with hearty devotion, desiring him to bestow upon us the gift of Faith, and all grace [...], by which wee may learne to make an holy use, as of all his Workes in generall, so of this and the like in speciall: to the glory of his Name, and the eternall comfort of our owne soules, through Iesus Christ our Lord. To whom with the Father and the blessed Spi­rit, Three excellent Persons, one glorious God, bee ascribed all Honour and Praise, now, and for evermore. Amen.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.