<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>An apology against the defence of schisme Lately written by an English diuine at Doway, for answere to a letter of a lapsed Catholicke in England his frend: who hauing in the late co[m]mission gone to to [sic] the Church, defended his fall. Wherin is plainly declared, and manifestlye proued, the generall doctrine of the diuines, &amp; of the Church of Christ, which hitherto hath been taught and followed in England, concerning this pointe.</title>
            <author>Garnet, Henry, 1555-1606.</author>
         </titleStmt>
         <editionStmt>
            <edition>
               <date>1593</date>
            </edition>
         </editionStmt>
         <extent>Approx. 386 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 108 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.</extent>
         <publicationStmt>
            <publisher>Text Creation Partnership,</publisher>
            <pubPlace>Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :</pubPlace>
            <date when="2013-12">2013-12 (EEBO-TCP Phase 2).</date>
            <idno type="DLPS">A01490</idno>
            <idno type="STC">STC 11617.2</idno>
            <idno type="STC">ESTC S100190</idno>
            <idno type="EEBO-CITATION">99836040</idno>
            <idno type="PROQUEST">99836040</idno>
            <idno type="VID">283</idno>
            <availability>
               <p>To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication 
                <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal</ref>. 
               This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to 
                <ref target="http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/">http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/</ref> for more information.</p>
            </availability>
         </publicationStmt>
         <seriesStmt>
            <title>Early English books online.</title>
         </seriesStmt>
         <notesStmt>
            <note>(EEBO-TCP ; phase 2, no. A01490)</note>
            <note>Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 283)</note>
            <note>Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English Books, 1475-1640 ; 175:01)</note>
         </notesStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <biblFull>
               <titleStmt>
                  <title>An apology against the defence of schisme Lately written by an English diuine at Doway, for answere to a letter of a lapsed Catholicke in England his frend: who hauing in the late co[m]mission gone to to [sic] the Church, defended his fall. Wherin is plainly declared, and manifestlye proued, the generall doctrine of the diuines, &amp; of the Church of Christ, which hitherto hath been taught and followed in England, concerning this pointe.</title>
                  <author>Garnet, Henry, 1555-1606.</author>
               </titleStmt>
               <extent>[12], 202 [i.e. 200] p.   </extent>
               <publicationStmt>
                  <publisher>Fr. Garnet's first press,</publisher>
                  <pubPlace>[London :</pubPlace>
                  <date>1593]</date>
               </publicationStmt>
               <notesStmt>
                  <note>By Henry Garnet.</note>
                  <note>Imprint information from STC.</note>
                  <note>P. 200 misnumbered 202.</note>
                  <note>Identified as STC 711 on UMI microfilm.</note>
                  <note>Reproduction of the original in the Bodleian Library.</note>
               </notesStmt>
            </biblFull>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <projectDesc>
            <p>Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl,
      TEI @ Oxford.
      </p>
         </projectDesc>
         <editorialDecl>
            <p>EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.</p>
            <p>EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).</p>
            <p>The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.</p>
            <p>Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.</p>
            <p>Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.</p>
            <p>Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as &lt;gap&gt;s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.</p>
            <p>The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.</p>
            <p>Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).</p>
            <p>Keying and markup guidelines are available at the <ref target="http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/docs/.">Text Creation Partnership web site</ref>.</p>
         </editorialDecl>
         <listPrefixDef>
            <prefixDef ident="tcp"
                       matchPattern="([0-9\-]+):([0-9IVX]+)"
                       replacementPattern="http://eebo.chadwyck.com/downloadtiff?vid=$1&amp;page=$2"/>
            <prefixDef ident="char"
                       matchPattern="(.+)"
                       replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/textcreationpartnership/Texts/master/tcpchars.xml#$1"/>
         </listPrefixDef>
      </encodingDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <langUsage>
            <language ident="eng">eng</language>
         </langUsage>
         <textClass>
            <keywords scheme="http://authorities.loc.gov/">
               <term>Schism --  Early works to 1800.</term>
               <term>Protestantism --  Controversial literature.</term>
            </keywords>
         </textClass>
      </profileDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
            <change>
            <date>2020-09-21</date>
            <label>OTA</label> Content of 'availability' element changed when EEBO Phase 2 texts came into the public domain</change>
         <change>
            <date>2012-09</date>
            <label>TCP</label>Assigned for keying and markup</change>
         <change>
            <date>2012-09</date>
            <label>SPi Global</label>Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images</change>
         <change>
            <date>2012-11</date>
            <label>Pip Willcox</label>Sampled and proofread</change>
         <change>
            <date>2012-11</date>
            <label>Pip Willcox</label>Text and markup reviewed and edited</change>
         <change>
            <date>2013-02</date>
            <label>pfs</label>Batch review (QC) and XML conversion</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:lang="eng">
      <front>
         <div type="title_page">
            <pb facs="tcp:283:1"/>
            <pb facs="tcp:283:1"/>
            <p>AN APOLOGY AGAINST THE <hi>DE<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>FENCE OF ſchiſme.</hi>
            </p>
            <p>Lately written by an Engliſh Di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uine at Doway, for anſwere to a letter of a lapſed Catholicke in England his frend: who ha<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uing in the late Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>miſſion gone to to the Church, defended his fall.</p>
            <p>
               <hi>wherin is plainly declared, and mani<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſtlye proued, the generall doctrine of the Diuines, &amp; of the Church of Chriſt, which hitherto hath bene taught and followed in England, concerning this pointe.</hi>
            </p>
            <q>
               <bibl>Prou. 22.</bibl>
               <p>Doe thou not paſſe the auncient bounds which thy Fathers haue putte.</p>
            </q>
         </div>
         <div type="epigraph">
            <pb facs="tcp:283:2"/>
            <q>
               <bibl>Eph. <hi>4.</hi>
               </bibl>
               <p>That now we be not children wauering, and caried about with euery wind of do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctrine in the wickednes of men, in crafti<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>nes, to the circumuention of errour.</p>
            </q>
            <q>
               <bibl>Gal. <hi>5.</hi>
               </bibl>
               <p>You ranne well: who hath hindered you not to obey the truth? The perſuaſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on is not of him that calleth you. A litle leauen corrupteth the whole paſt. I haue confidence in you, in our Lord, that you will be of no other mind. But hee that troubleth you, ſhall beare the iudgeme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t whoſoeuer he be.</p>
            </q>
            <q>
               <bibl>Teſtament of Rhemes. Mat. <hi>10, 32.</hi>
               </bibl>
               <p>See how Chriſt abhorreth them that de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny him before men. Which is not only to deny any one litle article of the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke Faith commended to vs by the Church. but alſo to allow, or conſent to hereſy by any meanes: as by ſubſcribing, coming to their ſeruice &amp; ſermons, fur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thering the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> any way againſt Catholikes, and ſuch like.</p>
            </q>
            <pb facs="tcp:283:2"/>
            <q>
               <bibl>Teſtament of Rhemes in the An<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>notation vpon the <hi>2.</hi> epiſtle of S. Ihon.</bibl>
               <p>Though in ſuch times and places, where the community or moſt part be infected, neceſsity often forceth the faithfull to conuerſe with ſuch in worldly affaires, to ſalute them, to eate and ſpeake with them, and the Church by decree of Cou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſell for the more quietnes of timorous conſciences prouideth, that they incurre not excommunication or other cenſures for communicating in worldly affaires with any in this kind, except they be by name excommunicated, or declared to be heretickes, yet euer in worldly con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſation and ſeculer actes of our life we muſt auoide them as much as we may, becauſe their familiarity is many waies contagious and noiſome to good men, namely to the ſimple. But in matter of religio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, in praying, reading their bookes, hearing their ſermons, preſence at their ſeruice, partaking of their ſacraments,
<pb facs="tcp:283:3"/>and all other communicating with the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in ſpirituall thinges: it is a great dam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nable ſinne to deale with them.</p>
            </q>
            <q>
               <bibl>
                  <note place="margin">Eph. 4</note> To all trew Catholickes, carefull to keepe the vnity of the ſpirite in the bond of peace: S. Ihon in his ſecond epiſtle geueth this warning.</bibl>
               <p>Iſ any man (any Prieſt or Ieſuite from Rome, Rhemes, Spaine) come vnto you, &amp; bring not this doctrine: receiue him not into the houſe: nor ſay, God ſaue you, vnto him. For he that ſaieth vnto him,<note place="margin">2. Tim. 3.</note> God ſaue you, communicateth with his wicked workes.</p>
            </q>
         </div>
         <div type="table_of_contents">
            <pb facs="tcp:283:3"/>
            <head>
               <note place="margin">The order of the ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iections.</note> A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL THINGES CONTEIND IN THIS Treatiſe.</head>
            <list>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 1. &amp; 2 obiection</note> Whether there be a diſpenſation lately graunted for going to Heretickes Churches. §. 1 &amp; 2.</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 3.</note> Whether it be defended and allowed by Prieſtes in England. § 3</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 4.</note> That it is againſt the authority of all the learned men of our age. § 4</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 5.</note> Of the example of the 3. children in Nabuchodo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſors Court. § 5</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 6.</note> The obiection of Iehues diſſimulation is refuted. § 6</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 7.</note> The fact of Naaman &amp; of Valentinian is expoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded. § 7</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 8.</note> The extrauagant of Martinus the fifth and the Councell of Conſtance is examined. § 8</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 9.</note> That for obedience it is not lawfull to be preſent at Heritickes ſeruice. § 9</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 10.</note> That feare cannot make it lawfull, or not volun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tary. § 10</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 11.</note> That by no good intention it can bee iuſtified. § 11</item>
               <item>That the right which Catholickes haue to the auncient Churches, cannot excuſe it § 12</item>
               <item>What is vnderſtoode by ſuch going vnto the Church as is diſproued. § 14</item>
               <item>what goings may be allowed. § 15</item>
               <item>what diuerſe maners of going are vnlawfull. §. 16</item>
               <item>whether the doctrine of recuſancy is ouer ſcrupu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lous or rigorous. § 17</item>
               <item>Of the Precept of exterior confeſſion of faith. §. 19</item>
               <item>Of the Precept of not denying our faith. § 20</item>
               <pb facs="tcp:283:4"/>
               <item>That going to the conuenticles of heretickes is an exterior acte of hereſy. § 21</item>
               <item>Thoſe which goe to heretickes ſeruice are many waies excommunicate. § 22</item>
               <item>Wherin Schiſme doth conſiſt. § 23</item>
               <item>That they are moſt properly Schiſmatickes. § 24</item>
               <item>That euery hereticke is alſo a ſchiſmaticke, and ſo he which goeth to heretickes congregation, is both an exterior heretike and a proper ſchiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke. § 25</item>
               <item>That a man may be an exterior hereticke, and yet not an abſolute hereticke; but none may be an exterior ſchiſmatike, but he ſhall be an abſolute ſchiſmaticke. § 26</item>
               <item>That all exterior heretikes are alſo perfect ſchiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes: yet not exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate as ſchiſmatickes, but in two caſes: in both which this action of going to the Church is placed. § 27</item>
               <item>That going to the Church with heretickes, is ſu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perſtition. § 28</item>
               <item>That it is contrary vnto Chriſtian obedience. §. 29</item>
               <item>That it is in the higheſt degree of lying, and diſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mulation. § 30</item>
               <item>That it can neuer be altogether void of ſcandall, which is rather increaſed by Proteſtation. § 31 and of Proteſtation, ſee alſo § 16. and § 35</item>
               <item>That it is a greate deceit, to thinke it to be at any time voide of daunger of inſection. § 32</item>
               <item>Of the greeuouſnes of this ſinne, and compariſon with other kindes of greeuous offenſes. § 33</item>
               <item>Of the duety of Parents toward their children in this point, and of euery one towards his neigh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bour. § 34</item>
               <pb facs="tcp:283:4"/>
               <item>That this action of going to hereticall ſeruice, was alwaies a ſigne diſtinctiue of religion, before any law, ſtatute, or declaration. And of the variety of ſignes of religion, and the lawfulnes or vnlawfulnes therof. § 35</item>
               <item>What may by the Canons be permitted in this point. § 36</item>
               <item>What proceeding muſt be obſerued in diſcuſſing the authoritie of Canons herein. § 37</item>
               <item>Of the generall bond of auoiding heretickes. §. 38</item>
               <item>What the Canons haue decreed of auoiding he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes ſeruice. § 39</item>
               <item>What they decree of ſchiſmatickes ſeruice. § 40</item>
               <item>To the intent that euery one may ſully be ſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tisfied in this great and important contro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſy: beſides the obiections which of pur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>poſe were propounded at the begining, here follow alſo the anſweres to other obiections which may be made, although not propou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded in maner of obiections: yet handled ſuf<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ficiently in the diſcourſe.</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 12.</note> The 12. obiection, that he which goeth to the Church, is not a ſchiſmatike, but rather an exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rior hereticke. § 25</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">obiection The 13.</note> The 13. obiection, that this acte is only exterior ſchiſme, and not abſolute and perfect ſchiſme. § 26</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 14.</note> The 14. obiection: that if it were ſchiſme, all ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>terior heretickes ſhould be excommunicate, becauſe they are all ſchiſmatikes. § 27</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 15.</note> The 15. obiection: that it is not ſchiſme, becauſe it is not accompained with an inward deſire of diuiſion. § 27</item>
               <pb facs="tcp:283:5"/>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 16.</note> The 16. obiection: that temporall lawes or Prin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces cannot appoint diſtinctiue ſignes of religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on. § 35</item>
               <item>
                  <note place="margin">The 17.</note> The 17. obiection: that we haue no expreſſe Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>non, or auncient practiſe of the Church, a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt going to heretickes ſeruice. § 36.37.38.39.40</item>
            </list>
         </div>
         <div type="printer_to_the_reader">
            <pb facs="tcp:283:5"/>
            <head>The Printer to the Reader.</head>
            <p>HAuing made readye for thy neceſſary pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeruation againſt all contagion of Schiſme, ſo preſent an Electuary, (Gentle Reader) I thought it very profitable for thy better vnderſtan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding, and the eaſier reading of this Treatiſe, to ad<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uertiſe the of the generall order and methode ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>of. The wholle booke therfore is fittely deuided into fiue partes. The firſt anſwereth in order the obiections, which are vſually made in defence of Schiſme: and were the principall cauſe of writing this Treatiſe, according to the occaſion miniſtred by the letter here confuted although afterward al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſo, through the wholle booke, many obiections be aunſwered: either propounded by the author him ſelfe, or touched in the aforſaide letter.</p>
            <p>The ſecond parte, out of Theologicall grounds and reaſons,<note place="margin">§. 13.</note> declareth the vnlawfullnes of this kind of Schiſme.</p>
            <p>The third parte, intreateth of ſome thinges an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nexed vnto this Schiſmaticall action.<note place="margin">§. 32.</note> as daunger of infection: the greeuouſnes of the ſinne, &amp; com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pariſon with other ſinnes: and the neglecting of our dewty towardes our neighbours in the refor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mation therof.</p>
            <p>The fourth parte deduceth out of that which went before,<note place="margin">§. 35.</note> that this action was vnlawfull and a ſigne diſtinctiue before any ſtatute of the realme, or late Canon of holy Church: and largely entrea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth of the nature and variety of ſignes diſtinctiue of religion.</p>
            <pb facs="tcp:283:6"/>
            <p>The fifth,<note place="margin">§. 36.</note> examineth the auncient practiſe of Gods Church: and out of the ſame doth euident<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly conclude the determined purpoſe.</p>
            <p>This, gentle Reader, did I thinke good to warne thee of: deſiring in recompence of all my labour, that thou wilt courteouſly pardon the faultes eſca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ped: which although they be more than I would, yet conſidering many difficulties of a ſtraunge lan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>guage, a ſtraunge countrey, abſence of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> authour, and an vnready copy: are notwithſtanding fewer than I expected. Other faultes thou maieſt lett a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lone, vntill in reading thou be at a ſtay: yet in two places there wanting wholle lines: take the paines at the beginning to amend them. that ſo both thy owne courſe in reading may be eaſied: and thoſe which ſhall come afrer thee, may be furthered.</p>
         </div>
         <div type="errata">
            <pb facs="tcp:283:6"/>
            <head>The faultes eſcaped.</head>
            <list>
               <item>P. 4. in the margen. Iob. 41.</item>
               <item>P. 23. there wanteth the quotatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of S. Auguſtin in the margen. Tract. 48. in Ioan.</item>
               <item>P. 29. l. 2. in marg. 8.9.</item>
               <item>P. 35. l. 15. there wanteth a full pointe before, ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry well.</item>
               <item>P. 36. in the marge<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. at the beginning note, Tract. in Pſal. 124.</item>
               <item>P. 40. l. 2. it is not onely.</item>
               <item>P. 46. l. 17. vnuoluntary.</item>
               <item>P. 60. l. 7. for vndoubtedly, reade, vndewtifully.</item>
               <item>P. 61 l. 25. of this deede.</item>
               <item>P. 66. in the margen. l. 14. Q. Iniuncti.</item>
               <item>P. 75. l. 3. in religion.</item>
               <item>P. 76. l. 12. in the margen. ſence. l. 26. and outward.</item>
               <item>P. 81. l. 18. put a comma (after truely)</item>
               <item>P. 82. l. 30. reade thus, all heretickes; if ſuch be in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deed inwardly heretickes:</item>
               <item>P. 83. l. 20 which as a viſible.</item>
               <item>P. 85. l. 4. in the marg. reade thus. Pſal. 118. ver. 165.</item>
               <item>P. 93. l. 8 in marg. in Breuic.</item>
               <item>P. 95. l. 3. marg. c. 15. l. 18. away.</item>
               <item>P. 101. l. 23. mortall.</item>
               <item>P. 112. l. 12. reade thus. S. Agnes, My Angell will keepe me that I be not polluted with other mens filthines; or w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> S. Lucy, ibid. in marg. Amb. ſer. 90. ad Virgin.</item>
               <item>P. 113. marg. See §. 16.</item>
               <item>P. 116. l. 12. Concurrent.</item>
               <item>P. 123. l. penult. obiectes.</item>
               <item>P. 127. there wanteth the note of §. 34.</item>
               <pb facs="tcp:283:7"/>
               <item>P. 128. l. 26. they be neuer.</item>
               <item>P. 129. l. 18. marg. for 23. read 32.</item>
               <item>P. 130. l. 11. marg. Honoratur.</item>
               <item>P. 150. l. 12. for.</item>
               <item>P. 164. l. 15. to your politicke.</item>
               <item>P. 166. l. penult. Ariminum.</item>
               <item>P. 173. l. 5. marg. 162.</item>
               <item>P. 177. l. 5. with Martyrdome.</item>
               <item>P. 187. l. 20. Donatian</item>
               <item>P. 188. l. 2. marg. l. 2. vitae.</item>
            </list>
            <p>The places of S. Cyprian are ſometimes cited ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cording to an ould imperfect edition, which the authour vſed at the beginning: but afterward he gotte the laſt edition of Pamelius.</p>
         </div>
      </front>
      <body>
         <div type="tract">
            <pb n="1" facs="tcp:283:7"/>
            <head>AN APOLOGY AGAINST THE DEFENCE OF Schiſme.</head>
            <p>THe firſt degree of felicity (as worthely no<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth S. CYPRIAN) is not to offend:<note place="margin">Lib. 1. ep. 3</note> the ſecond to know the offence. It is a greate miſery and moſt heauy puniſhment of Gods iu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtice, after that the innocency and purity of an vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſpoted conſcience is once loſt, not to know what is amiſſe: and not feeling the ſmart of the diſeaſe, to neglect the helpe of phiſicke. One of the high<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>eſt degrees of pride, the roote and complement of all iniquity, is the defence of ſinne:<note place="margin">Pſal. 140.</note> and with very great reaſon did DAVID aske of God that his hart might not decline into wordes of malice, for to frame excuſes in iniquities. The not knowing of ſinne is ſo great a plague of Gods indignation, that he hath reſerued the ſame eſpecially for the times of Antichriſt, when wickednes abounding,<note place="margin">2. Theſ. 2.</note> Gods ſeuere puniſhment ſhall alſo match the ſame. At which time as ſaieth S. PAVL, to ſuch as haue not receiued the charity of truth that they may be ſaued, God will ſend the operation of er<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ror, that they may beleue a lye. So did he puniſh thoſe which<note n="*" place="margin">Eſa. 3.</note> preached their ſinne like vnto So<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dome, and were ſo farre from the knowing of ſinne, that by preaching it they did defend it. Woe vnto you (ſaith the Prophet ESAY) which call euill, good; and good, euill: making darknes,<note place="margin">Eſa. 5.</note> light: and light, darknes: making bitter, ſweet: and ſweet, bitter. Woe vnto you which are ſage in your owne eies, and wiſe before your ſelues. Be not<note n="*" place="margin">Ro. 13</note> ouer wiſe, but feare (ſaith the veſſell of Electi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on)
<pb n="2" facs="tcp:283:8"/>for<note n="*" place="margin">Ro. 11.</note> the wiſdome of the fleſh is death. The<note n="*" place="margin">Ro. 8.</note> Prophet Ieremy, in the perſon of God propoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth a queſtion of the obſtinacy of the Iewes, what ſhould the cauſe bee, that hee which was falne,<note n="*" place="margin">c. 8.</note> did not riſe againe, and he which was gone backe, did not returne. But he anſwereth it in theſe wordes: why therfore was this people in Hieru<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſalem auerted with a contentious auerſion? they haue taken hold of a lye, and would not returne. I haue attended and harkened, no man ſpeaketh, that which is good, there is none which doth Pe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nance of his ſinne, ſaying what haue I done? All are turned vnto their owne courſe as a horſe going impetuouſly vnto warre. The Kite in the aire hath knowne his time, the Turtle, and Swallow, and Storke haue kepte the time of their coming: but my people hath not knowne the iudgement of their Lord. How doe you ſay, we are wiſe, and the law of God is with vs? verely the lying ſtile of the Scribes hath wrote a lye. Thus Ieremy. I may ſeeme vnto you (my deare frend) to forget the fa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>miliarity of an epiſtle, and being caried away with the vehemency of an extraordinary greife rather to write an inuectiue againſt an enemie, then in lo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uing maner to deale with an abſent frend. A frend in deed I alwaies haue accounted you, and hope that on my part our frendſhippe ſhall continue vntill death, neither can any thing in the world cutte a ſunder in me, that which w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the two moſt forceable bondes of nature and grace hath bene knitte togeiher. And yet muſt I needs, although with no ſmall diſcontment of my owne, accuſe here your vnfaithfulnes, as well towardes my ſelfe,
<pb n="3" facs="tcp:283:8"/>as alſo towards God in both reſpectes if they be ſufficiently waighed, &amp; not according to the cor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rupt indgement of worldly affection: you haue miniſtred not a litle matter of iuſt ſuſpicion, leaſt our frendſhip ſhould not be perpetuall. The per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fect charity of a Chriſtian to any other, is founded in that capacity which euery one hath of eternall felicity: and therfore we muſt loue ſo long as this life laſteth, w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> Chriſtian charity, the moſt deſperate ſinner in the world: for ſo long as he here liueth, he is not out of poſſibility of ſaluation. But if that death which depriueth him of bodily life and ſenſe doe entrap him either vnready or careleſſe of that bliſſe for which he was created: then as he ſalleth into eternall miſeries: ſo is he cut off from all affe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ction of whoſoeuer is the child of God, and no more to be beloued the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> Lucifer. You haue ſought of late to enter into frendſhip with this worlde, you haue eſtemed your worldly riches more then God, you haue moſt baſely denied him before men: what can you now expect, but that you ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>knowledge your ſelfe the<note n="*" place="margin">Iac. 4.</note> enemy of God, altoge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther vnworthy of him, and euen now already de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nied of Chriſt before his Father and his Angells, and except you correct your error) to be before all his elect at the day of iudgement denied for euer? And herin you not only iniured God your creator, but diſſolued alſo the knot of perfect frendſhip to<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wardes his creatures: for how can there be true frendſhip, where charity is loſt? or perfect amity, where there is no right of perpetuity? But that w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> doth moſt increaſe your miſery &amp; my greife, is, y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> you doe with arrogant defending of your iniquity,
<pb n="5" facs="tcp:283:9"/>ſtubbornly w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſtand al helpes of your recouery. You are anerted as the Prophet ſaith) w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> a contentious auerſion, you haue taken hold of a lye, yea you haue of your ſelfe taken vpon you the office of a Scribe, and being your owne counſailor, with a moſt lying penne haue ſet downe vnto your ſelfe a moſt perniciouſe vntruth. The holy Patriach IOB very particulerly deſcribing the properties of the Diuell in the figure of LEVIATHAN,<note place="margin">Iob. 14.</note> ſaith that his body is as it were targettes of melted met<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tall, compact of ſcales ioining together. One is lincked vpon an other, &amp; not ſo much as the wind can get betweene them. One will cleaue vnto ano<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther, and holding faſt them ſelues they will not be ſeuered.<note place="margin">Greg l. 33. mor. c. 30.</note> 
               <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> What is this body of the Diuell (Par<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>don I pray you, my true, but frendly ſpeaches) but your ſelfe and ſuch others, as hauing ſeuered your ſelues from the vnity of Chriſts, body, are now incorporate vnto the monſter LEVIATHAN? You therfore are become a braſen targette, whi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leſt with the hardnes of your hart, you driue backe the arrowes of holſome counſell, and with the ſcales of ſophiſticall reaſons, you beare off the fruit full dint of Gods inſpirations Neither are you con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tented with your owne ſtubbornenes, but (as God hath giuen you many ſinguler talents, more fitte to be conuerted to better vſes) you haue lincked vnto your ſelfe the iniquity of others, therby to confirme your owne, and keepe away the ſacred counſaile of godly inſtructions from your brethre<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>; leaſt by their recouery, either your pleaſant malady ſhould be cured, or your ſtifnecked iniquitie con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>founded. Wherin alſo as your wholle euill doth
<pb n="4" facs="tcp:283:9"/>come from this, that you haue receiued the ope<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ration<note n="*" place="margin">2. Theſ. 2</note> of errour for to beleeue a lye: So doe you moſt manifeſtly imitate the father of lies, who from the begining doth nothing but lye: I meane that LEVIATHAN of which I ſpoke before, who contenting not himſelfe with his own ruine, abuſed the excellency of his moſt bewtifvll nature, to the drawing of the third part of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſtarres<note n="*" place="margin">Apoc. 12.</note> of hea<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>uen into the like deſtruction. How vnlike are you, I pray you, vnto this Dragon, who abuſe ſo ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny giftes of learning and nature, not only to ſinne in the ſight of the wholle world; therby to giue euill example: nor to defend your ſinne commit<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted; ſo to peruert the vnderſtanding of many: but alſo by earneſt perſuaſions and buſie diuulging of your euil hatched opinions, to allure your acquain<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tance to ſo ſinfull imitation. It is a miſerable thing to ſinne, ſo to loſe Gods fauour: worſe to ſinne openly, ſo to giue a ſcandall: more abhominable to defend your ſinne, ſo to refuſe repentance: But moſt horrible, with the filth of ſinne, reproch of ſcandall, obſtinacy of a proude minde erected a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt God and his holy ſpirite, to cauſe directly the fall of a number. The damned reprobate ſoules although in hell they haue no good affecti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on at all, but rather a deſire of all iniquity: yet haue they a certaine horror of cauſing the dam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nation of others: as may appeare by the rich glut<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ton, who knowing how much his torment ſhold increaſe by the coming to hell of his wicked bre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thren, whom he had with euill example corrup<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted: not of charity towards them, but of a natu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rall loue to himſelfe deſired to preuent their iudge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment.
<pb n="6" facs="tcp:283:10"/>What may in the like caſe a Chriſtian ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pect, who directly fighting againſt Chriſt, ſeeketh to perſwade that which he diſſwaded, trauaileth to pull downe that which he builded, cauſeth that to periſh for which he ſuffered? This is your e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtate (my deare frend) whileſt you ſeeke not law<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fully to abound in your owne ſenſe, as S. PAVL teacheth: but by your owne vnſound and pernici<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ous iudgement, condemne and deſpiſe the wholle conſent and autority of holy Church. But what reaſon haue you leaſt you may ſeeme without rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon to goe mad for to defend either your faithleſſe practiſe, or wicked doctrine of going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church with heretickes? You haue as you write vnto me, two kind of argumentes: the one conſiſteth in au<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tority the other in reaſons. Let vs examine theſe groundes, let vs waigh your proofes, if perhappes you may riſe againe from your impiety. I ſaye (if perhappes) for wheras from the dead as from one which is not (as ſaieth the wiſe man) confeſſion periſheth:<note place="margin">Eccli. 17.</note> you which by defence of your ſinne doe ſhut vp the only welſping of Gods grace, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſing and acknowleging the ſame: muſt of ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſity be dead and ſo ouerwhelmed w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> earthly co<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gitations, that without his call who raiſed Lazarus you cannot be reuiued.</p>
            <div n="1" type="section">
               <head>§. 1.</head>
               <p>Your firſt anb cheifeſt autority is deriued from the very head and toppe of all autority.<note place="margin">The .1. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of the Popes diſpenſatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  </note> You ſay that the heife paſtour of Gods Church hath ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>proued the fact hath he approued it? and how I pray you? by diſpenſation, or definition? hath he defined it Excathedra to be lawfull in it ſelfe,
<pb n="7" facs="tcp:283:10"/>neither contrary vnto the law of God, nor vnto the poſitiue law of the Church? or hath he ſuppoſing it to be only againſt the ſecond, as one which is the ſteward of Gods family, diſpenſed herein?</p>
               <p>Now for the diſpenſation:<note place="margin">That the Pope hath not diſpen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed.</note> I ſee not how if ther were any, it could auaile you, conſidering the dan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ger of diſpenſations from Rome in our countrey: and that although you would neuer ſo carefully conceale it, yet you might hereafter be put to your othe, whether you went to the Church vpon any diſpenſation or tolleration from Rome, or no. But let vs ſcanne the truth of this diſpenſation. When was it graunted? by whom? in what forme, or ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner? how paſſed it the Alpes, without our priuitie in theſe countries? why are not the Preiſtes there with you made priuy thereunto, conſidering that the<note n="*" place="margin">Mal. 2.</note> lippes of the Preiſtes doe keepe knowledge, &amp; men muſt require the law out of their mouth? what ſubordination is there kept, whe<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſuch things are ſent vnto lay-men and not vnto the Paſtours &amp; teachers of your ſoules? why doe we not in theſe countries informe thoſe which come out of the Seminaries of this enlargement? muſt a few vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>learned, timerous, inconſtant lay-men (and ſuch as your ſelfe are for I meane not all) be the Popes Agentes in ſo waighty matters, to haue the diuul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ging of them in the Realme? But how began the Pope ſo lately to tender thus prouidently your di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtreſſes? and how hard harted haue his predeceſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſors bene all this time, who haue not conſidered them? was Gregory the 13. whom both for corpo<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ral &amp; ſpiritual prouiſion for our countrey, we may worthely call an other Apoſtle of England &amp; heire
<pb n="8" facs="tcp:283:11"/>vnto y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> firſt of his name, not only in his ſeate, but alſo in his affections: way y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> great Patrone, ſo kind vnto our nation that he would oftentimes weepe at the hearing of our miſeries, only in this point vnkind? or did he with all his learning, in which he excelled, forget his authority in this one point? Bring forth the letter, the meſſenger, the reporter of his owne knowledge of this new graunt: which if you cannot (as I am moſt ſure you cannot) then as I ſaide vnto you before out of the Prophet Hie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>remy, that you haue taken hold of a lye in your erroneous propoſition, which you maintaine: So doe I now ſay that you haue taken holde of an other lye to proue the former, and ſuch a lye, as vpon my conſcience is as long as betweene you and Rome, as broade as the way thither, whether you goe by Sea or by Germany, ioining therunto all the ſpace in the middeſt: And finally as loud, (as if lies may be hard farther then true tales) it may be heard from Weſtminſter hall to the Popes Conſiſtory. So that plainly to deale with you, I will not ſay you haue deuiſed, for I know your nature too well: but in ouer much credulity you haue taken hold of a long, large, loud lye: al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though it pleaſed one in cheife autority of late to reporte that ſuch a diſpenſation was graunted for men and not for woemen, who ſurely hath bene alſo too credulous: for it did not beſeeme his place or perſon for to lye.</p>
               <p>Now for any definition of the lawfulnes of the acte:<note place="margin">The Pope hath not defined it as lawfull.</note> I ſay the very ſame, which for the diſpenſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion. And beſides, for them both I adde, that it was neuer heard of in any age, that the Pope did
<pb n="9" facs="tcp:283:11"/>define or diſpenſe in a thing which hee had no Diuines to maintaine. It may be that he define a thing which hath bene doubtfull among Di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uines,<note place="margin">The Pope neuer defi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neth or diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>penſeth, contrary to common doctrine of Diuines.</note> or that he diſpenſe in a thing which ſome affirme; others deny to be diſpenſable, as we know he practiſeth in diſpenſing in ſome kind of matri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mony: But this is ſuch a point, ſo neceſſarily dedu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ced out of Gods word, ſo confirmed by the practiſe of all ages, ſo reſolued in all learned mens iudge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments of the world: that I aſſure you, whoſoeuer taking vpon him the name of a Diuine, ſhould propound it as a doubtfull or diſputable queſtion (I meane practically, and not onely as to exerciſe mens wittes, in diſputing of very reſolued caſes:) in any vniuerſity of the world, he would be hiſſed at: much leſſe it is to be thought that the Pope would diſpenſe in it.</p>
               <p>Yea this I ſay vnto you and am moſt aſſured of,<note place="margin">The Pope cannot diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>penſe in this caſe.</note> that although this point of going to the Church with heretickes were only by poſitiue lawes forbid<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>den (as vndoubtedly it is of the owne nature and by Gods law vnlawfull, as ſhall be ſhewed hereaf<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter) yet the caſe ſo ſtandeth in England that he can not diſpenſe in it. For the action of going to the Church,<note place="margin">going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church is exacted for contempt of Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on: &amp; ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore (beſide many other reaſons) in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diſpenſable.</note> is alwaies exacted in contempt of Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke religion, as appeareth both by the vſages of thoſe poore ſoules which in ſome partes before the late Commiſſioners relenting, were with ſinguler deſpite and barbarous vſages by the officers driuen to the Church; and alſo by the ordinary ſubmiſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on which at the Aſſiſes diuers haue pronounced, when they haue become conformable, wherin the principall pointes of Catholicke religion are renou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ced.
<pb n="10" facs="tcp:283:12"/>So that I know who purpoſely comming to the Aſſiſes to ſubmitte him ſelfe, by hearing his fellow before him to make ſo ſhamefull a prote<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtation, which alſo very contemptuonſly ſome are like grammer ſchollers commaunded to repeate againe, as not hauing pronounced it well, or not ſpoken loud enough: this man, I ſay, perceiuing more to be exacted then he had ſtomacke to beare withdrew himſelfe and abode the aduenture of the law. And although all which yeeld to goe to the Church doe not make this ſubmiſſion: yet hereby may we ſee that the intent of going to the heretickes ſeruice, is ſo to obey the Prince, that Gods Church and autority may be contemned.</p>
               <p>Now therfore the Pope cannot diſpenſe in the breach of his owne law,<note place="margin">The Pope cannot diſpenſe in the conte<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>pt of his owne lawe.</note> when it is exacted in con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tempt. For than is not his owne law onely broken but alſo Gods: who ſaieth,<note n="*" place="margin">Luc. 10</note> he that deſpiſeth you deſpiſeth me. So that if the Pope hauing excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municated one of thoſe Emperours with whome he had in times paſt ſo great contention, ſhould fall into the ſaid Emperours handes, and the Em<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perour ſhould ſay vnto him, thou haſt excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municated me &amp; therfore to Preiſt will ſay Maſſe in my preſence: But in deſpite of thee I will make thy ſelfe ſay Maſſe before me. In this contempte although the Emperour be excommunicate only by the Popes own decree: yet if the Pope celebrate, he ſinneth mortally. Euen ſo although this were a poſitiue law of not going to the Church with heretickes, yet if you be commaunded of purpoſe to doe contrary vnto ſuch law: by doing it, you ſinne mortally; neither can the Pope diſpenſe that
<pb n="11" facs="tcp:283:12"/>his owne autority be had in contempt. This is the common doctrine both in matters of excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nications,<note n="*" place="margin">Caiet. ver. contem. &amp; verbo. In Feſto licita.</note> which are poſitiue, and alſo in working of holy daies, w<hi rend="sup">e</hi> alſo (at the leaſt beſides Sonday) are poſitiue. So that although vpon neceſſity one may worke vpon ſuch a daye, yet were it a mor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tall ſinne, if euen with danger of death he wrought at his Lords commaundement, for deſpite of the Church or contempt of that particuler law. And the like is in diuerſe caſes.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="2" type="section">
               <head>§. 2</head>
               <p>Thus much therfore of your autority which you fetch from the Pope. Now let vs goe to our Engliſh Cardinal: of whoſe autority of diſpenſing,<note place="margin">The ſecond obiectio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of the Engliſh Cardinalls diſpenſatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, or altering his opinion</note> I muſt ſay no leſſe then I ſaid of his ſuperiour. Be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſides that it being held by your lawiers there, that it is treaſon to take meate and drinke of ſo dange<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rous a perſon: you may well ſuppoſe that it will be a deeper kind of treaſon to fetch from him his diſpenſations. But he hath perhapps altered his opinion concerning the lawfulnes of this act,<note place="margin">His opinion is well knowne by all his ſchol<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>lers, and more then 20. diuerſe places in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> new teſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of Rhemes.</note> and now being ſory that he hath heretofore bene ſo ri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gorous, he hath geuen you to vnderſtand how farre you may proceed.</p>
               <p>To this I can ſay nothing more, then I haue ſaid before of the reſt: but that you may doe well to counſaile all Recuſants which haue hitherto paied the ſtatute, or otherwiſe forfeited any thing for their recuſancy, to chalenge of him a ful reſtitu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of all their damages. For he is not ignorant that who vpon raſh deciſion of a queſtion of iu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtice or iniuſtice of an act, is cauſe of any mans loſſe or hinderance: is by Gods law and mans lia<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ble
<pb n="12" facs="tcp:283:13"/>for the ſame. beſides the offence which hee committeh towardes God, as well in the ſame reſolution, as if withall he haue therby cauſed the ſpirituall ruine of many ſoules, which any man may perceiue whether it hath proceeded of his for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mer rigour or no. But the truth is, that theſe are thinges which are fitte onely to be tould or belee<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued by Babes.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="3" type="section">
               <head>§. 3</head>
               <p>And what maruaile if you beleeue ſuch reportes of perſons ſo farre off,<note place="margin">The 3. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of the opinion of Preiſtes in England</note> wheras you are ready to be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leeue the ſame of your Preiſtes at home? w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> whom becauſe you dare not either for the loue of your owne opinion, or for the feare of the penalty of the law go forth of your dores to conferre: you are eaſily drawne to beleeue euery flying falſe report. For I am very credibly giuen to vnderſtand, that there is not one Catholike Preiſt in England, who differeth from the reſt of his brethren (one only ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cepted) of whom I heare that no good and godly perſon maketh any accounte at all, leaſt perhaps the miniſteriall ſpirite of pride, which muſt needes haue bene once in him before he was a Catholike, ſhould returning vnto his former houſe make the laſt things worſe then the former. eſpecially wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>as I vnderſtand that the Superiours of Rhemes, hearing of his doings, ſent word to all other Preiſts by one coming vnto you: that they ſhould not feede his contentiouſe humour by writing againſt him, but account him rather as a heathen and Publicane. And diuerſe of our countrey-men are here reſolued, that he will be very ſhortly ſuſpen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded for his ſinguler &amp; perniciouſe doctrine. This
<pb n="13" facs="tcp:283:13"/>alſo I am aſſured of, that a certaine other Preiſt, who in England hauing committed vnto writing ſome fantaſticall conceites of his owne concerning this point, not finding ſufficient credit at home, re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>turned to Rome whence he firſt came, with his conceited writinges: there freely and voluntarily making an humble ſubmiſſion and reuoking his dreames, burned his papers. and I heare alſo that for deſire of perfect ſatisfaction for his former ſin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gularity and errour, he went after his returne into England to the aforeſaid Preiſt, of whoſe opinion before his departue he had known nothing at all: and informed him very charitably of the effect of his iorney. But very likely it is that he auailed litle. Yet this I do vnderſtand that ſince his returne from Rome this Preiſt behaued him ſelfe very well in England before his impriſonment (for now they ſay here, he is in Bridewell) far contrary to the con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceite they had of him with vs. For this I know that at Rome to hinder his returne vnto you, and to preuent the returne vnto his vomitte which was feared, they would haue either kept him as priſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner, or proceeded with him euen ſo farre as the in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quiſition, if it had not bene feared leaſt it would haue ſcandalized the countreis there, &amp; diſcouered too much vnto them the imperfections of our na<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion. And in the low countrey he ſhould haue bene detained by force, if they could haue found of charity who would haue diſcharged his com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mons. But thankes be to God he hath behaued himſelfe otherwiſe then we looked for. God grant that in priſon he be the ſame which he was abrod. It would alſo haue beſeemed any humble ſpirite,
<pb n="14" facs="tcp:283:14"/>ſuch as it is not like the other ſinguler Preiſt is en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dowed withall, to haue repaired alſo to his Supe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riours, (if he thinke he hath any) to enquire theire iudgement: ſeeing himſelfe ſo ſinguler at home. Now then you are vtterly ſhutte off from the auto<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rity of your Preiſtes at home, if you will not ven<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture your ſoule either vpon the fancy of one who hath ſince becoming ſoberer made knowne vnto you the ſober iudgements of his graue Superiours: or of one who for his too much learning may per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>happs haue harboured in his minde his auncient olde acquaintance. And if there be any others: counſaile them I pray you to keepe their doctrine ſecrete for feare of what may light vpon them.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="4" type="section">
               <head>§. 4.</head>
               <p>Now againſt all theſe autorities which you ſee notwithſtanding how they be either rotten or co<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>loured and painted with a counterfaite ſhew,<note place="margin">That going to heretikes ſeruice is a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt the autority of all learned men of our age</note> I op<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>poſe (that I may now ſaye nothing of auncient times in which you will deny perhappes that your eſtate was fully reſembled) I oppoſe I ſay moſte true and reuerend authority of moſt ſinguler men, which haue floriſhed in our owne age, and moſt perfectly vewed and examined our owne cauſe. Firſt the 12.<note place="margin">The Coun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cell of Tre<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t.</note> Fathers of the Councell of TRENT whoſe learned iudgement in this point is yet ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tant. Neither ought it to be called in to ſuſpicion becauſe it was not generally ſet downe. For both there are ſufficient witneſſes aliue for the verity therof, and it was our owne ſuite to haue it done couertly, and perhappes it was a queſtion vnwor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thy of publicke diſcuſſion, none but a few time<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rouſe Catholickes of a ſmall corner of the worlds
<pb n="15" facs="tcp:283:14"/>calling it into doubt. For in hereticks iudgementes againſt whom the Councell was gathered the caſe was moſt cleare &amp; euident: that a man may not go to the congregations of a contrary religion, and other very waighty matters were put ouer to diuers Deputies: as the correcting of the Miſſall and Bre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiarye, the cenſure of bookes forbidden, the o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſeeing of the text of ſcripture, the making of a Cathechiſme for Paſtours and other like. And fi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nally the iminent death of the Pope cauſed the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> to leaue vnfiniſhed many other matters of our faith, as may appeare to who-ſoeuer conſidereth the wholle courſe of their decrees.</p>
               <p>Secondly I bring the autority of ſo many Reue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rend and learned Biſhopps and Prelates,<note place="margin">The aunci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ent Clergies doctrine &amp; example w<hi rend="sup">e</hi> the example alſo of the Laity.</note> as at the beginning of this ſchiſme did both refuſe them<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſelues; and induce others to refuſe ſuch participa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion with heretikes. For all the world can very well teſtifie, that from the very begining there haue bene diuerſe lay-men who haue refuſed. and it is a childiſh diſtinction of ſay that thoſe firſt Reue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rend Fathers thought that to go to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church was lawfull for lay-men and not for the clergye. To this I add that one of them wrote a learned booke of the ſame argument: and when they beganne more dilligently to looke into the matter, they ad<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mitted none to Maſſe or Sacraments which did not fully determine to auoide the prophane con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uenticles of heretickes. And if they were before vnwilling to publiſh their iudgement herein, ei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther it was for feare of the ſeculer power, or leaſt that the common people whoſe ſinne before had bene excuſable for their ignorance, ſhould not<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>withſtanding
<pb n="16" facs="tcp:283:15"/>the knowledge of the truthe herein, goe forwarde in theire vnlawfull courſe vnto far<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther damnation in which caſe charitie bindeth vs to omitte correction of our brothers faulte. Or if there were ſome more fearefull then others who allowed this action, we muſt conſider that per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>happs they were of that number, which not long before in King Henries time, in matters of greater moment had ſhewed greater infirmity.</p>
               <p>Thirdly of thoſe which for the confeſſion of theire faith did leaue their countrey:<note place="margin">The bani<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhed Do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctours and Diuines.</note> certaine it is that not one was doubtfull in this queſtion: that you may ſee this to be no Seminary reſolution. For one of the moſt principall of that company in the preface aſa booke yet extant of Images, doth ſo fully and learnedly diſcourſe therof, that a ſincere vnderſtanding can require no more. And this e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner ſince the yeere 64 which is almoſt 30 yeeres ſince. And he complaineth not a litle of the foule ouerſight which was in the clergy, not to controle at the firſt ſo vnlawfull an action. Of my know<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ledge alſo was he wonte to blame his owne and other Preachers negligence, who in Queene MA<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>RIES time not fearing any ſuch alteration as we ſince haue proued, did not forewarne the people of their duety in ſuch accidents.<note place="margin">The Col<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ledges of Rome and Rhemes.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Laſt of all I adde vnto theſe the whole Colledge of Rhemes &amp; of Rome, and all thoſe vnto whom the managing &amp; gouernment therof doth apper<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine, their bookes and writinges in ſo great num<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ber, the wholle multitude of Preiſtes and Martyrs which haue come from thence:<note place="margin">Preiſtes and Martyrs.</note> So many deuoute and conſtant lay-men either Martyrs or otherwiſe:
<pb n="17" facs="tcp:283:15"/>All which no doubte beeing guided by the holy ghoſt, who dwelled within them, could not but looke into the diſtreſſed caſe of ſo many weake<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lings, ſo many woemen and children, ſo greate families: as eaſely with this new doctrine might haue bene relieued. Thus therfore all your auto<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rity is ouerthrowne, neither can you bring any thing to allowe your action, but the temporall lawes of our countrey: which in this caſe ought to beare no more ſway for the crediting of the new religion profeſſed in England, then in times paſt the decrees of the Turkes for the reuerence of their Mahomet: it being of olde condemned<note n="*" place="margin">Silu. verbo Apoſtaſia. §. 4 &amp; haero ſis primo §. 9</note> as an acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of infidelity, to kiſſe for feare the tombe of Ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>homet, though farre againſt the inward conſent.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="5" type="section">
               <head>§. 5.</head>
               <p>Your firſt reaſon is the example of the three chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dren W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> in Babilon were preſent at the ſolemne de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dication of Nabuchodonoſors Idoll although they kneeled not downe to worſhippe the ſame.<note place="margin">The 4. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of the exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple of the children in Babilon. Dan. 3.</note> wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>upon you inferre, that a Catholicke may be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent at hereticall ſeruice, ſo that he doe no reue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rence therunto, nor receiue the communion. To which I anſwere. Firſt, that their preſence onely in that place was not religiouſe or ceremoniouſe. for the ceremony of religion beganne onely in the proſtration vnto the Idoll: at which time they were ſufficiently diſcerned from the others by their ſtanding vp: wherby they ſhewed the contempte therof, and no way ſatisfied the precept of the Ty<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rant. And according to this ſolution, that is, if there were no other ceremony there uſed but the proſtration: they might although they knew be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore
<pb n="18" facs="tcp:283:16"/>ſuch a thing to be intended, with great per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fection come thither, and preſent themſelues vnto ſuch Martyrdome as was to enſew. But our caſe and theirs is not alike: for the very preſence at ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice with heretickes is religiouſe, neither is there any thing required of whoſoeuer is moſt deuoutly and willingly preſent, but to be in that place in an orderly manner. And this in Catholicke religion alſo is accounted a participation IN DIVINIS. to be preſent in the place. So that he which is at Maſſe where an excommunicate perſon heareth Maſſe, is alwaies iudged to participate W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> the ſame. this being in Chriſtian religion the nature of all ſacred actions, that the laye people are as it were patients, that is, doe nothing ſolemnlye, but all action appertaineth to the clergy, to whome it be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>longeth to purge, illuminate and make perfect, as both out of<note n="*" place="margin">ad hebr. 10</note> S. PAVL &amp; alſo out of S.<note n="*" place="margin">De hier. Ecc. c. 5</note> Dioniſius we may gather: And yet if a Catholike came thi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther, and ſhewed him ſelfe preſent at the very reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>giouſe actions of heretickes, without all contempt of Catholicke Religion, ſcandall, and ſhew of conformitye, onely to mocke publicklye, or di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſturbe the miniſter, as thoſe holy children did in Babilon:<note place="margin">3. Reg-13. A like caſe vnto this of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> children.</note> ſuch a one ſhould (if there were no ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall or tumult to enſew) no more offend then the Prophet which came into Bethel to denounce Gods threatnings to wicked Ieroboam whileſt he was at his Idolatry. The like vnto the caſe of the three children were if that in England there were a proclamation that ſuch a day euery one ſhould repaire vnto the markette towne there in the mar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>kette place to ſubſcribe. Now ſome Catholicke
<pb n="19" facs="tcp:283:16"/>perhaps will no come at all. Others for a very de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſire of ſhewing their religion, &amp; no way to colour theſelues, knowing what the euent will be, come thither: and all the reſt ſubſcribing refuſe to ſub<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſcribe. whether parte thinke you hath donne bet<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter? the one, which hath auoided, or the other, which hath perfectly ſought to viter his profeſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on? Neither muſt you thinke that he which ſhould be preſent at hereticks ſeruice and refuſe to receiue, had donne like the three children: for he hath in one thing denied, and in the other confeſſed his faith. and we may not doe euill that good may enſew. Theſe children did nothing but in what<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſoeuer was religiouſe plainly ſhew their vncorrup<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted faith.</p>
               <p>Now if you reply: that ſuppoſing they knew before that Idolatry was there to be practiſed,<note place="margin">A replye.</note> then conſequently they committed an vnlawfull action in giuing the world to vnderſtand that they wolde doe that which was vnlawfull: After which man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner we condemne ſuch as ſay they will goe to the Church, although they goe not in deed nor intend to goe:<note place="margin">The anſwer</note> I anſwere that humane actions are ſpeci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fied by the end. And ſo long as the meanes for that end be indifferent, and may be referred as well to a lawfull as to an vnlawfull end: we may permitte euen in matters of faith the wrong vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtanding in the beholders. Yet ſo that if wee may ſeeme to geue probable occaſion of denying our faith, if the end doe not preſently follow which we intended than we fatisfie our neighbour by open meanes and declaration of our firſt purpoſe. For example if one intend to goe to preach catholickly
<pb n="20" facs="tcp:283:17"/>in an hereticall Church,<note place="margin">Whether a Catholicke P. may goe to preach in the Church</note> the meanes hereunto, are firſt to goe that way which leadeth to the Church: than to goe into the Church, and ſo ſtraight into the pulpitte theſe thinges being indifferent, and the declaring of his purpoſe being ready to enſew: this man is not to be condemned, and if he ſhold meete one which knew him, he might ſay that he was going to the Church. for although this ſay<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing were vnlawfull alone by it ſelfe: yet being ioi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned with many other actions which concurre to make but one wholle action, it is no more a deni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all of his faith than if a man making profeſſion of his faith, in one ſentence ſhould haue the one halfe ſound heretically which by one worde enſueing immediately is turned to a lawfull ſenſe. For as a mans meaning is not to be gathered by halfe a ſen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tence: ſo neither is it by halfe an action; when the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> action is not morally interrupted. yet if this man were hindered of his purpoſe ſo that he were not permitted to preach: then were he bound to certe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſye thoſe which ſaw him, and knew that he went to the Church, of his iuſt determination. And yet were it vnlawfull for ſuch a one to be in ſuch maner preſent before his ſermon that he mighte ſeeme to participate with them in any parte of ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice: as if they ſong a pſalme at the begining, at which he ſhould make no ſhew of diſtinction. for theſe are not indifferent meanes for his end, nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther may he doe euill that good may follow.</p>
               <p>But if any Catholicke priuye to his intention ſhould goe thither for to heare him:<note place="margin">In what ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner a Cath<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>olicke may goe to heare ſuch a Preacher.</note> he ſhoulde vndoubtedly ſinne, if he were ſo preſent, that his being there were not knowne to be no more or<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>derly
<pb n="21" facs="tcp:283:17"/>or fauourable then the preachers. For the preachers preſence is ſufficiently ſhewed for what end it is: but ſo is not the others, but all the reſt of the company is eſteemed hereticall as coming in ſhew to an hereticall ſermon.<note place="margin">An other like caſe.</note>
               </p>
               <p>An other like caſe were if one ſhould goe into an Idolls temple when they are preſent at Idola<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny, and pull downe the Idoll: his going in, would no doubt be lawfull and commendable. Euen ſo ſaye I of theſe children who intending there to make demonſtration of their faith: in an indiffe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rent action of going and ſaying they would goe to the feild DVRA, concealed their meaning to be vttered afterwarde, when the action ſhould ceaſe to be indifferent, they being religiouſly preſent at no part of the ſame: And if ther were any other re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligiouſe ceremony: it is like they ſhewed their diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>like therin, as well as in the cheifeſt ceremony of proſtration.</p>
               <p>It might alſo be that they preſently after theire coming went vnto the Kings commiſſioners to certefie them of there purpoſe, that they would not worſhippe, but cleaue onely to the true God whom they acknowledged.</p>
               <p>Secondly I anſwere vnto the wholle in this ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner.<note place="margin">A ſecond anſwere to the wholle caſe.</note> I ſay that they knew not of any Idolatry to be co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mitted, or any religiouſe action to be exerciſed, but onely a ſolemne reſtiuall erection or publicke vſage of a moſt ſumptuouſe and huge monument of the Kinges greatnes. And this is ment by the worde (dedication.) For although the Etimology of the worde be taken from an applying or offe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ring or conſecrating a thing to an other, and ſo
<pb n="22" facs="tcp:283:18"/>there is implied withall a certaine religicuſe cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mony in the ſame, when it is donne to God: yet cannot it here ſignifie any ſuch thing. for if the King accounted it a God as the euent ſhewed: did he meane to dedicate God vnto him ſelfe? or did he meane to conſecrate his God? who would thus conceiue of this dedication? although I confeſſe in prophane writers it is ſo oftentimes taken: yet in diuine ſcriptures muſt we alwaies take the moſt proper ſignification of wordes, whan there can no abſurdity follow. I ſay therfore that the King, although he purpoſed Idolatry, yet by this worde (dedication) did not meane to ſhew his intent: and that the children by the ſame worde, vnderſtood neither making of a God, nor conſecrating of any thing vnto a falſe God, but only a feaſt at the new erection, or at the firſt vſe of the huge and mon<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtrous Image: Euen as at the rearing of houſes, or at the finiſhing of citties and their firſt inhabi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ting is accuſtomed.<note place="margin">The ſignifi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>catio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of this word Dedi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cation.</note> This will I ſhew out of the latin, greeke and hebrue word. And firſt for all theſe three languages; the very ſame word which is in this place, is in two other manifeſt places in that prophane ſenſe, which I haue euen now de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>clared Deur. 20. Who is the man which hath built a new houſe, and hath not dedicated it? lett him goe and returne into his owne houſe, leaſt he dye in battell, and an other deciate it. <gap reason="foreign">
                     <desc>〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉</desc>
                  </gap> What other meaning is in this place then to beginne to inhabite the houſe which was lately builded? Like wiſe in the title of the 29 Pſalme we reade thus. A Pſalme of the Song, in the dedication of the houſe of DAVID: <gap reason="foreign">
                     <desc>〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉</desc>
                  </gap> that is of his houſe w<hi rend="sup">c</hi>
                  <pb n="23" facs="tcp:283:18"/>he built in Hieruſalem, as in the 2 booke of the Kinges the 5 chapter is recorded.</p>
               <p>This being the vſe in the holy ſcripture of theſe wordes in generall: the greeke and hebrue wordes are more indifferent then the latine.<note place="margin">The greeke word.</note> The greeke (ENCAENIA) ſignifieth, properlye as much as (INITIALIA) that is the ſolemne begining or renouation of any thing, the worde (CAENOS) of which it is deriued importing nothing elſe then New. But it is better to heare S. Auguſtine ſpeake ENCAENIA, ſaith he, was the feſtiuity of the de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dication of the Temple. for in the greeke tongue CAENON is that which is new. for whanſoeuer any new thing is dedicated thoſe are called ENCAE<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>NIA. now that very vſe hath this word: if any man putte on a new coate, he is ſaid ENCAENIARE. Thus S. Auguſtine. where if we will Engliſh EN<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>CAENIARE we muſt ſay that he which putteth on a new coate doth either dedicate his coate be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe he beginneth firſt to vſe it, or at the leaſt that he ſeemeth in a certaine maner to keepe ENCAENIA or a feaſt of his new coate. where who ſeeth not that there can be no religiouſe meaning in the word? The hebrue word HANVCCHA ſigni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fieth as largely as DEDICATIO in latin,<note place="margin">The hebrue word.</note> but it is alſo indifferent by deriuation to the begining of any thing. For the verbe HANACH whereof it is deriued ſignifieth to ſeaſon: and becauſe thoſe which are taught the firſt rudiments of arte, doe beginne as it were to be ſeaſoned: hereupon doth it alſo ſignifie to inſtruct. And for the ſame reaſon to dedicate. becauſe that which is dedicated, is the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> firſt vſed, and than as it were ſeaſoned. Wherup<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pon
<pb n="24" facs="tcp:283:19"/>HANICH in the ſcripture ſignifieth a childe taught, wherin no ſpirituall dedication is impor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted: and HANICHIM Gen. 14. is taken for new<note n="*" place="margin">The ſoul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diers which Abraham tooke with him.</note> ſouldiers ſuch as had lately bene trained vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to warre, not ſuch as had bene dedicated religiouſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly vnto God. In like maner in the 22 chapter of the Prouerbes where we reade in the hebrew HA<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>NOCH LANAAR: the meaning is not dedicate religiouſly, but ſeaſon or beginne to inſtructe a young man according to his way: alſo when he is olde he will not depart from it.</p>
               <p>But if any one ſhould vrge the word of erect<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing the Image, for why it was already erected, and there could be no other end now of coming, but Idolatry: I anſwere, that although it were ſette vp before, yet might there be ſome prophane ſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lemnity at the firſt vſe therof. euen as at the rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ring of houſes, the feaſt is made after the ſetting vp of the houſe. Alſo we may very well ſay, that the ſcripture here vſeth the figure of Anticipation, as in many other places, ſo that when they came togither, the Image was not erected, but it is ſaid to haue bene already erected in reſpect both of the time in which the hiſtory was written, and alſo in reſpect of the time in which they denied worſhip vnto it: eſpeciall wheras it is credibly to be thought that the King after the miracle of the fornance, cau<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed the Image to be pulled downe: Euen as if we ſhould ſay: K. Henry commaunded all his Lords to come to the ſolemnization of the matrimony of Q. Katherine whom he had maried: the mea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ning is not that ſhe was maried before the ſolem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nization, but that in reſpect of her diuorce follow<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing
<pb n="25" facs="tcp:283:19"/>it may be ſaid that he had married her, whom afterward he putt away. although in the greeke and hebrew, this is no more then an ordinary pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>terperfectenſe yea in greeke it is the Aoriſt, which is indifferent to any time paſt.</p>
               <p>To conclude therfore aſwel by the circumſtance of the place and intent of Nabuchodonoſor as by the ſignification of the three languages in W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> this part of ſcripture is written, it is euident that the children might and did vnderſtand no Idolatry: and ſo came as it were to a ciuill feaſt or triumph,<note place="margin">A 3. anſwere</note> not knowing what would happen. A third an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwere we may giue. that they might of ignorance erre, and thinke that to be lawfull which in deed was not. For not all thinges which are reade in ſcripture euen of Saintes are to be rules of our life,<note place="margin">Lib. de mend. c. 5.</note> (as teacheth S. Auguſtine) but thoſe onely which the ſcripture doth either commend expreſly or lay before vs in them as to be imitated. As for exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple LOT did well in keeping him ſelfe vnſpotted in that wicked citty, &amp; in harbouring the Angells, for which he is in the ſcripture it ſelfe comme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ded. Alſo in diſſuading the men of his citty from at<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tempting wickednes. yet in ſeeking to deliuer his daughters vnto them therby to diuert them from their purpoſe, who will defend him from blame of iniurye to his daughters? The Midwiues of Aegipte did well and are commended for their pie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty, but not for their lying. IVDETH is commen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded for the affection towardes the ſafety of her countrey: yet not by all doctors excuſed from a lye in ſpeaking vnto Holofernes: although her words may haue ſome myſticall vnderſtanding. So per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>happs
<pb n="26" facs="tcp:283:20"/>may we ſay that theſe children were com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mended, and approued by God with ſo great a miracle for their conſtancy in withſtanding the Kings commaundement: yet is not all their other behauiour therby canonized. Euen as if one ſhold with inuincible ignorance of this our queſtion goe to the Church with heretickes: &amp; yet for refuſing to receiue the communion be hanged: he were a Martyr for his fortitude in the one, &amp; excuſed for his ignorance in the other. Yet becauſe we are not vrged hereunto, hauing two other ſufficient an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſweres: it is beſt to excuſe them being ſuch ſinguler holy perſonages not only from ſinne in this action, but alſo from ignorance.<note place="margin">A 4. an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwere.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Fourthly conſidering what great offices theſe three perſons bore in the kingdome of Nabucho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>donoſor, as we reade in the ſame chapter and in the firſt: we may defend their going to ſuch place as Naaman Syrus is by diuerſe defended: of which we will ſpeake hereafter.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="6" type="section">
               <head>§. 6.</head>
               <p>Your ſecond reaſon you bring from the example of IEHV an Idolater,<note place="margin">The 5. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection, of the exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple of Iehu. 4. Reg. 10.</note> and very much diſcommen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded by the ſcripture it ſelfe. ſuch ſhiftes are you put vnto when you are forced to begge the patronage of wicked men for your euill courſe. And yet ſhall you ſee in the end that it maketh more againſt you, than with you. IEHV (ſay you) was preſent at the ſacrifices of BAAL, although afterward he killed all the Idolatrous Preiſtes of BAAL. ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore may wee alſo for a good end of ſauing our goods, liues, or families, be preſent at hereticall ſeruice.</p>
               <pb n="27" facs="tcp:283:20"/>
               <p>Now Sir I returne your Argument vppon your ſelfe. IEHV by Sainte AVGVSTINE and all Catholicke Doctours is reprehended for beeing preſent at the Sacrifices of BAAL, though for a principall end of reſtoring Gods Religion in his wholle kingdome: therfore by the iudgement of all Catholicke Doctours you are condemned whileſt you be preſent at the ſacrifices of hereticks, although of your preſence might enſew the con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſion of the wholle Realme, much leſſe to ſerue your belly, and to conſerue the Mammon of ini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quity. For although there be difference betweene Idolatry and hereſie, and the ſeruice of Idolaters and of heretickes: yet one yeelding vnto an other in wickednes, they both agree that they be ſuper<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtitiouſe.<note place="margin">D. Tho. 22, q. 92. ar. 2. Two kind of ſuperſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tions. and both in he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes ſeruice</note> For there are two ſortes of ſuperſtitions the one conſiſteth in the worſhip of a falſe God, which is called Idolatry: the other which hath re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tained vnto it ſelfe the common name of ſuperſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion is found in the vnlawfull worſhip of the true God. which is in ſeruice of heretickes, and ſuch like, where other ceremonies are vſed than which Chriſt and his Church hath ordained. Theſe alſo are of two ſortes as well noteth Caietane.<note place="margin">Verbo Supſt</note> For ei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther they be perniciouſe, or ſuperfluouſe. Thoſe are perniciouſe, which are contrary vnto the verity of faith. Thoſe are ſuperfluouſe, which are any wayes contrary to the cuſtome of the Church, or otherwiſe then the Church doth vſe. The firſt are alwaies mortall ſinnes: the ſecond alſo alwaies, when there is contempt or ſcandall, although of themſelues they were not perniciouſe. Iudge you therfore whether both ſortes of this ſecond kind of
<pb n="28" facs="tcp:283:21"/>ſuperſtition be not in hereticallſeruice. So that out of the fact of IEHV, as you bring an exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple of going to heretickes ſeruice, becauſe you thinke he did well: So I out of the ſame prooue ſuch diſſimulation to be wicked, becauſe IEHV did euill.<note place="margin">See Aug. l. con. mend. c. 3. See Bannes 22. q. 3. ar. 2 dub. 1.</note> which I proue by the conſent of S. Au<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>guſtine and all ſchoole men, after S. Thomas the principall ringleader of them all. And I maruaile not a litle that you who take vpon you Skill in di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uinity, did ſo peremptorily bring the example of IEHV, concealing the ſchoole mens opinion of his fact. For you knew vndoubtedly that this Ar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gument was not coined out of your owne witte, but bothpropounded and anſwered, before either your ſelfe or your new confraternity were hatched. S. Thomas bringing this example againſt himſelfe to proue diſſimulation lawfull, anſwereth it in this maner.<note place="margin">22. q. 111. ar. 1. ad. 2.</note> The diſſembling of IEHV, it is not ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary to be excuſed from ſinne, or from a lye. for he was wicked, as who did not departe from the Idolatry of Hieroboam. yet is he commended and temporally rewarded by God,<note place="margin">4. Reg. 10.</note> not for his diſſimu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lation, but for his Zeale with which he deſtroied the worſhip of BAAL.<note place="margin">In ep. ad Gal. c. 2.</note> Thus S. Thomas. And although S. Hierome ſeemeth to allow of IEHVES diſſimulatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>: yet you might haue conſidered that he doth it for to proue S. PETERS diſſimulati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on in Antioch to haue bene without ſinne where. euen as that which he ſeeketh to inferre is contrary to S. Auguſtine and all the Diuines,<note place="margin">Ep. 19. Ter l. 4. in marcion. Cypr ep. ad quintu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. Amb. hie. Aug. ep 89.19. Greg. l. 28. mor, c. 12. 1. Reg. 21.</note> yea the true meaning of the ſcripture, S. PAVL ſaying, that PETER was reprehenſible and diuerſe other aun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cient Fathers: So was his antecedent alſo falſe, and
<pb n="29" facs="tcp:283:21"/>not to be followed. although we may alſo ſay, that he allowed diſſimulation in generall but not in this particuler, wheras he bringeth other exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ples of lawfull diſſimulations: as of DAVID be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore Abimelech faining himſelfe madde, and of CHRIST our Sauiour taking vpon him the ſhape of a ſinner, that condemning ſinne and fleſh, he might make vs in himſelfe the Iuſtice of God. In like maner might IEHV haue a lawfull inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion to diſſemble, and yet in the practiſe exceed, God permitting for ſo good an end, either his ſin, if he culpably erred, or his excuſable ignorance, if among ſo many Idolaters he had none to inſtruct him: as in ſecular and warlike men, ſuch particu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ler knowledge of godly dueties many times we ſee to be wanting.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="7" type="section">
               <head>§. 7.<note place="margin">4. Reg. 5. The 6 ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of Naaman ſyrus.</note>
               </head>
               <p>Your next reaſon, is the fact of NAAMAN: who after he was conuerted vnto the true God, yet had (as it ſeemeth) leaue of ELIZEVS the Pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>phet to be preſent at the Princes ſacrifice vnto Idols The Hiſtory is this: NAAMAN returning vnto the man of God, with his wholle company came and ſtood before him and ſaid. Verely I knowe that there is not any other god in the whole earth, but onely in Iſraell. I beſeech thee therfore, that thou receiue this bleſſing of thy ſeruaunt. But he anſwered. The Lord liueth before whom I ſtand, I will not receaue it. And when he was earneſt, he would not conſent. And NAAMAN, ſaide as thou wilt. But I beſeech thee graunt vnto me thy ſeruant that I may take the burden of two muletts of the earth: for thy ſeruant will not make any
<pb n="30" facs="tcp:283:22"/>more holocauſt or ſacrifice vnto falſe Gods, but to our Lord. This onely thing there is, for y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> which thou maieſt intreate our Lord for thy ſeruaunt. when my Lord ſhall enter into the temple of Rem<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>mon for to worſhippe, and he leaning vpon my hand, if I ſhall worſhippe in the temple of Rem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon, he worſhipping in the ſame place: that our Lord doe pardon thy ſeruant for this thing who ſaid vnto him, goe in peace. this farre goeth the hiſtory.<note place="margin">Naaman ſy<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rus would receaue Preiſtes if he now liued.</note> Now Sir I doe moſt hartely wiſh that you were like vnto NAAMAN SYRVS. for then would you giue your bleſſing aboundantly vnto ELIZEVS and his ſchollers: and cary of the ho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly land, though it were a burden into your houſe, erecting there an Aultar to doe ſacrifice vnto the true God, and vnto no other. But ſo ſtandeth the caſe with you, &amp; ſuch as you are, that when once you goe to the temple of Remmon, you forget E<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>LIZEVS and the holy land, and the ſacrifice of the true God, and at the very firſt ſteppe into here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticall ſynagogues, as it were take your leaue of all goodnes. Whether this be true or no, I referre my ſelfe to your owne conſcience. But to goe directly vnto the matter: I ſay that aſwell the hebrew as the greeke and latin word, is indifferent in holy ſcriptures, to ſignifie ciuill and diuine worſhippe, and importeth no more then to bowe him ſelfe humbly vnto the ground. which we read in Gene<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſis<note n="*" place="margin">c. 23.</note> Abraham to haue done for ciuill courteſy to the children of Heth, and in the 18. chapter be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore he did the like to the Angells. And in theſe places, &amp; alſo in many more, doe the ſame words ſignifie either ciuill worſhippe to men, or religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe
<pb n="31" facs="tcp:283:22"/>reuerence to Angells or Saintes. and ſo the common doctrine of Diuines is, that NAAMAN did not bow vnto the Idoll, but vnto the King, yeelding him that temporall ſeruice or eaſe of his body, which was conuenient vnto his Princelye perſon and greatnes: which was alſo the knowne cauſe of his preſence in that place, he being other<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wiſe knowne to deteſt Idolatry after his recouery from his leper. of which you may reade Lyra and other his companions.<note place="margin">Of going to the Church with the Prince. See §. 5.15. and 16.</note> After which maner diuers doe ſay that for a temporall ſeruice to a Prince to be donne by a knowne Catholicke, and not ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>acted in contempt, or more in the Church then otherwiſe, as to beare the ſword, vphold the Prin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces perſon, or other ſuch like: any perſon who ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſarily is to attend on the Prince, and cannot by any ordinarye meanes keepe him ſelfe from the Court, may accompany the ſame Prince of a con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nary religion vnto the Church: becauſe his going is not as to the Church: neither is he thought to goe to the Church, as to a Church: that is, as it hath ſeruice and communion: but as to a place where he muſt ſerue his Prince with lawfull tem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>porall dueties, ſuch as he were to yeeld him in any other place: And that by this euident &amp; knowne temporall ſeruice altogether void of any religiouſe ceremony (for why he neither kneeleth nor ſhew<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>eth any reuerence at all, more than when he atten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth in other places) all ſignification of religion, vnion with heretickes, and contempt of Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lieke obedience is taken away: neither is he to be for all that accounted other than a Recuſant. But how farre in this matter one may proceed, I need
<pb n="32" facs="tcp:283:23"/>not bere to ſette downe, for you are no Courtier, and I thinke there be few Courtiers which in this point will trouble you, for counſaile. To whom if they ſhould aske your aduiſe, you may ſay the matter is very doubtfull. wheras many ſay that E<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>LIZEVS allowed not his petition, but with a doubtfull anſwere diſmiſſed him, ſaying goe in peace: Seeing perhapps that after the faſhion of courtiers he hearing the truth would not obey it. And ſurely vpon this word the ſcripture maketh no mention whether he went to the temple of Remmon, or no: ſo that his practiſe cannot ſhew vs Elizeus his meaning. But of this place I referre you to the two bookes written in our tongue: the one of ſchiſme the otherof the reaſons of refuſall. Sufficient it is that out of this lace you cannto in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſerre any formall preſence or going to the Church with heretickes, to be lawfull.</p>
               <p>The like anſwere vnto this, doe I giue vnto the example of Valentinian the Emperour,<note place="margin">Of Valenti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nian y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Em<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perour,</note> who go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to a temple with Iulian the Apoſtata (as The<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>odoret and Sozomenus reporteth) being one of his cheife captaines and alwaies aſſiſtant to his perſon (by reaſon that it was an auncient cuſtome as So<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>zomenus expreſlye noteth,<note place="margin">Theod. l. 3. c. 15 Sozo. l. 6. c. 6.</note> that the captaines of thoſe ſouldiers which were called Iouiani and Her<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>culiani ſhould alwaies follow the Emperour next behind him, as his defenders:) gaue the Porter a blowe on the eare for ſprinckling him at his en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trance with the Idolatrous water and cutte out of his garment ſo much as the water had touched, euen in the Emperours ſight, ſaying that he was therby not purged but polluted with a ſhamefull
<pb n="33" facs="tcp:283:23"/>filth. For which cauſe as he was by that Tyranni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>call Apoſtata ſent into baniſhment; ſo, as Theo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>doret writeth, he was by God within a yeere and few moneths for a reward of his confeſſion, exal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted to the Imperiall ſeate. Whoſe example if you would follow ſo often as by ſuch baſe officers your eares are ſprinkled with hereticall ſoundes: I dout not but ſome Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>miſſoner or other to your great benefitte would quickely prouide that you ſhould come to the Church no more.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="8" type="section">
               <head>§. 8.</head>
               <p>The fourth reaſon you make out of the Can<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>non lawe: which according to the extrauagant of Martinus. 5. and the Councell of Conſtance giueth leaue to participate euen in Diuine ſeruice with all maner aſ excommunicate perſons,<note place="margin">The 7. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> extrauaga<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t of Martin the fifth</note> except thoſe which either are by name excommunicate or notoriouſe ſtrikers of a clergy man</p>
               <p>This reaſon verely is ſo childiſh that I am euen aſhamed to anſwere it. For it is euen as if you ſhould argue thus. The Pope geueth me leaue to be preſent at Maſſe in a Catholicke Church and company with an hereticke: therfore he alloweth my going to hereticall ſeruice or communion with the ſame. When did you euer heare that by a Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke mouth, the heretickes prophane commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion was called Diuine ſeruice?<note place="margin">It were not lawfull to goe to he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes Churches although they had true Maſſe &amp; Pireſtes</note> Yea this I ſaye: that although in the hereticall Churches there were very true Preiſtes and the ſame Maſſe which is ſaide at Rome, with the ſame rites and ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies: yet a ſeparation being once made from the Catholike vnion, and the hereticks vſing a church aparte from the Catholicke: for all this decree, it
<pb n="34" facs="tcp:283:24"/>were a mortall ſinne, and an exterior act of here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſye to goe to the heretickes Maſſe, of which you ſhall heare Nauarre ſay his mind,<note place="margin">c. 27. n. 36.</note> agreeing herein with all other Diuines.</p>
               <p>He which for feare of death doth participate with an excommunicate perſon in Diuine ſeruices doth not ſinne, ſo that he participate not with a virtuall deniall of Catholicke faith: which would ariſe through communication with contempt,<note place="margin">See Sotus. 4. d. 22. q. 1. ar. 4. Silu. verb. exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. 5. dub 14. &amp; verbo Metus. q. 7 Maior. d. 18 q. 4. Couar. parag. 3. num. 9. Angles ar. 3 diff. 7. Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes may not be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent at Maſſe. See more of this point §. 38. The 8. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of Obedience Ser. 6. de ver. Do.</note> &amp; diſpiſing of excommunication. for it behoueth ra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther to dye then ſo to communicate. Wheras he is more bound to defend this article of faith of the autority and power of the Church to excommuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate, and the valew therof, then his owne corpo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rall life. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Now you may iudge whether your caſe were not ſo in England euen although you had true Preiſtes and true Diuine ſeruice. But in this riffe raſſe which you goe vnto, there is no que<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtion. Neither for all this may ſuch as are excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate be preſent at Maſſe although they be not of thoſe two kindes of excommunicate per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſons. For the Canon intendeth not to fauour them at all, but onely geueth leaue to the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke not to auoid for all the ſinful preſence of him which is excommunicate, and for all the prohibi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of the Church, which had bene vntill that time in force, of auoiding the participation of the excommunicate, not onely in ſpirituall, but alſo in ciuill and temporall thinges.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="9" type="section">
               <head>§. 9.</head>
               <p>Now to your fifth reaſon of obedience to the Prince wherin you trrumph. S. Auguſtine ſhall anſwere. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Who reſiſteth vnto power, reſiſteth
<pb n="35" facs="tcp:283:24"/>vnto the ordination of God: But what if he com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maund that which thou oughteſt not to doe? here truely contemne power, by fearing power.<note place="margin">See alſo .l. 3. confeſſ. c. 8.</note> Doe you conſider the very degrees of humane lawes. If the gouernour commaund any thing, is it not to be donne? yet if the Proconſull commaund the contrary, then truely doſt thou not deſpiſe power, but chooſeſt to obey the greater. Neither herein ought the leſſer to be angry, if the greater be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ferred. Againe if the Proconſull commaund one thing, and the Emperour another: is it doubted but that he is to be obeied, the other being deſpi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed?<note place="margin">S. Augu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtine would not allow going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church if he were a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mongſt vs. Eph. 6.</note> Therfore if the Emperour biddeth one thing and God an other: what doe you iudge? Paye tri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bute. Attend vnto my ſeruice very well: but not in the Idolls temple. In the Idolls temple forbiddeth it. who forbiddeth it? a greater power. Pardon me. thou thretneſt priſon, he thretneth hell. Here now muſt thou take vpon thee thy faith as a buck ler in the which thou maieſt quench all the fierye dartes of the enemy. Thus S. Auguſtine. Turne I pray you the wordes (Idolls temple) into hereticks conuentickle, and ſee how it fitteth your caſe. Or ſhew why there is not the ſame reaſon in the one as in the other.<note place="margin">in ep. ad Tit. c. 3</note> If it be good (ſaith S. Hierome) which the Emperour and gouernour commaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth? obey the will of the ocmmaunder, but if it be euill: auſwere him out of the Actes of the Apo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtles:<note place="margin">Act. 5.</note> It behoueth to obey God more then men. This ſame let vs vnderſtand both of ſeruantes to their maiſters, and of wiues to their husbandes,<note place="margin">A leſſon for wiues and children.</note> &amp; of children to their parents: that in thoſe things onely they muſt be ſubiect to their maiſters, huſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bandes,
<pb n="36" facs="tcp:283:25"/>parents, which are not contrary vnto gods commaundementes. Thus S. Hierome. Againe S. Auguſtine. Iulianus was an Infidell Emperour. was he not an Apoſtata? wicked? an Idolater? Chriſtian ſouldiers ſerued an infidell Emperour. when they came to the cauſe of Chriſt: they did not acknowledge but him onely which was in hea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uen. When he would that they ſhould worſhippe Idolls: that they ſhould offer incenſe: they prefér<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red God before him. But when he ſaied, bring forth the Army, goe againſt that nation: forth<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>with they obeyed. They diſtinguiſhed the euer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>laſting Lord from a temporall Lord, and yet were they ſubiect for the euerlaſting Lord, euen to the temporall Lord. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Thus you ſee what theſe ho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly Fathers doe iudge of ſuch kind of obedience.<note place="margin">Obedience alone is not intended in this lawe, but alſo reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion. L. 5. c. 1.</note>
               </p>
               <p>But let vs I pray you conſider more deepely the nature of obeidence. Although the very forme and wholle drift of obedience be to doe according vnto the law or commaundement of the Superi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our: yet as it appertaineth vnto euery law in com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon to direct vs vnto all kind of vertues, as Ariſto<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tle teacheth in his Ethickes. (for as he ſaith the law commaundeth vs to doe workes of fortitude, of temperance, and of meekenes, and in like maner of other kind of goodnes or naughtines comman ding the one or forbidding the other:) So is there no particuler precept or law, but beſides the vertue of obedience to it ſelfe, intendeth ſome act of ſome other vertue. Hence doth it proceed, that one w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> doth tranſgreſſe a law, is not forthwith called diſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bedient properly, vnleſſe<note n="*" place="margin">D. Tho. 22. q. 105. ar. 1. ad. 1.</note> he of purpoſe did tranſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>greſſe, becauſe he deſpiſed the law: but he is ſaid
<pb n="37" facs="tcp:283:25"/>to haue ſinned againſt that vertue which the law or precept intended. An example hereof we may haue in temperance. The law commandeth that we make but one repaſt on a faſting day. If a man ouercome w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> his appetite tranſgreſſe this precept: than hath he ſinned againſt temperance, not ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeruing that abſtinence which the law preſcribed. Neither is he properly in this act diſobedient; but ſo farre as diſobedience is materially included in euery ſinne, which in that it is a ſinne, muſt needs be againſt ſome precept or other. And this is very euident: for two cauſes. For if in euery ſinne there were a formall diſobedience: then could there be but one kind of ſinne in the world, that is of diſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bedience: and the particuler obiectes of euery ver<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tue, ſhould be but materiall in euery action, as the particuler malice of euery vice alſo materiall in re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſpect of one forme of diſobedience: and ſo but one nature of vertue &amp; vice in the world. Beſides: one may doe contrary vnto a law, in ſuch a light maner and with ſuch want of conſideration, that he may onely ſinne venially againſt the ſame. and yet if it were properly diſobedience, it were alwaies a mortall ſinne, implying in it ſelfe contempt of the law, which cannot be without a mortall de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formity,<note place="margin">See Caiet. verbo. Con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>temptus &amp; verbo Ino<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bedientia.</note> euen in the leaſt ſinne of the world, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though it were but an idle word. For to worke any thing of contempt and hatred of the law and law-makers, cannot be without ſuch hainouſnes.</p>
               <p>Now therfore in euery law there is ſome other goodnes intended beſides the goodnes of obedi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ence.<note place="margin">No law in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tendeth obe<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>dience only.</note> For when or in what countrey was it euer heard of, that there was a law made for no other
<pb n="38" facs="tcp:283:26"/>end but for obedience? Turne ouer all Brookes Abridgement of the law, looke vpon his titles, goe ouer all your Statutes, which haue bene from time to time made vnder diuerſe Kinges: See whether you can finde any title of any law in the worlde, onely for to be obedient. The law intendeth al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>waies obedience in euery particuler ſtatute, and bindeth the ſubiectes to obey the ſame, and neuer doubteth of the ſubiectes obedience, ſo long as he obſerueth euery law, and behaueth him ſelfe or<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>derly in the common welth: and hauing once ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cepted the Prince for his ſuperiour, and profeſſed his obedience vnto him, followeth his direction to all ciuill vertues. But that a law ſhould be made, whoſe end ſhould be onely obedience, without anyother reaſon of goodnes, or the breach of w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſhould be onely a contempt, without the tranſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>greſſion of ſome other vertue, of right and equity towardes the common welth: I confeſſe my igno<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rance and that I may be deceiued: yet I neuer ei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther heard or read in any age or in any author. Yea in the holy religiouſe eſtates where obedience is vowed, the ſuperiour alwaies commaundeth ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cording to the rule profeſſed, which is for to guide the ſubiectes to all particuler vertues, and to mor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tifie the worldly man, not ridiculouſly intending bare obedience and nothing elſe. obedience being practiſed in euery particuler commaundment.</p>
               <p>Than Sir in your ſtatute intituled An act to re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine the ſubiectes in their dew obedience, there muſt needes be intended ſome other vertue beſides obedience. For is not the wholle lawe ſufficient to ſhew obidience? or if there were any doubt of ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>knowledging
<pb n="39" facs="tcp:283:26"/>that Superiour by whom law is ad<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>miniſtred, were not othes of fidelity and homage the ordinary and accuſtomed way to acknowtedg the ſame? or is in this onely act obedience to bee ſhewed and in none elſe? in no place but in the Church? in no maner but by ioyning with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes in their ſeruice? where are ſo many other lawes of eating of fleſh, &amp; of other actions either co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>manded or forbidden, which we know how litle theſe great exacters of obedience doe eſteeme? So may you euidently ſee that it is not odedience only pretended, but ſome other end, ſome other reaſon of that which is proportionable vnto that marke which they ſhoote at, which if you can deuiſe any other then religion, conformity in their ſuperſtiti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on,<note place="margin">The pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tenſe of o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bedience maketh this actio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> worſe than before</note> contempt of Catholicke vnity: I pray you im<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>parte your conceite vnto me. I my ſelfe can ſee no<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thing elſe. wheof I doe inferre that by ſuch pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tended obedience, this act is made worſe then it was before. For a precept, law, or commaund<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment preſcribeth a matter to that vertue which it intendeth, of which it was not a neceſſary matter before. as the commandement of not eating fleſh vpon a faſting day, was not a matter of faſting ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary before the law. for why, one might haue before faſted better with one bitte of fleſh, than with a dainty dinner of diuerſe diſhes of fiſhe. but after the law it is a neceſſary obſeruance, and mat<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter preſcribed vnto faſting. So in like maner, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though to goe to the Church before with hereticks had not bene (as alwaies it was) an act of religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on: now being commaunded by the law, as an act of religion, (for that is the intent of the law,
<pb n="40" facs="tcp:283:27"/>&amp; manifeſtly pretended in the one or other ſtatute of going to the Church) it is only a ſimple act of obedience: but an act of obedience in ſuch a mat<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter principally intended, as is the profeſſion of a falſe religion. For euery religiouſe act applied vnto a falſe god, or a falſe kind of worſhip, or a falſe So<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ciety of worſhippers, is an expreſſe proteſtation of the ſame falſe worſhip or vnlawfull fellowſhippe. So ſhould you firſt haue proued this action to be lawfull in it ſelfe,<note place="margin">Obedience is no excuſe but whan the matter thereof is firſt proued lawfull.</note> and then you might haue infer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red that your obedience had bene lawfull. and you ſhould alſo haue ſhewed ſome end in this law o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer and beſides bare obedience, other then the end of religion: which ſurely muſt needes be yeelded to be the very end and obiect of the law. And this, long experience hath ſhewed in the Church of God: that when temporall Princes muſt be obeyed in Churches:<note place="margin">Amb l. 5. ep 33. ad Mar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cellinam.</note> there is farther daunger in it then I liſt now to ſpeake.</p>
               <p>But you ſhall ſee an example of Chriſtian obedience. When the Emperour was at greate ſtrife with S. Ambroſe the holy B. of Millan about the deliuering certaine Churches in the citty of Mil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lan vnto the Arrians (as alwaies before this feare<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full &amp; abiect age,<note place="margin">Ibid. S Ambroſe his obedi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ence to the Emperour.</note> Catholikes wold neuer be found amongſt heretickes in Churches: S. Ambroſe aun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwered the Emperour in this maner. Trouble not thy ſelfe, O Emperour, that thou maieſt thinke that thou haſt any emperiall authority ouer diuine thinges. To the Emperour, Pallaces appertaine: to the Biſhop, the Churches. To thee, is committed the righte ouer the publicke &amp; not ouer the ſacred walles. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> And when the ſame Saint was threat<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned
<pb n="41" facs="tcp:283:27"/>with death for the ſame cauſe by Calligo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nus the Emperours Eunuch, euen in the Church: God permitte (ſaith he) that thou doe that which thou threatneſt. for I will ſuffer that which be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>commeth a Biſhop; thou ſhalt doe that which be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeemeth an Eunuch <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> In which controuerſie the ſouldiers ſent word as ſaith S. Ambroſe, vnto the Emperour, that if he would come abrode he mighte with good leaue. But that they woulde waite vpon him, if they ſaw him agree with Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholickes:<note place="margin">Trew Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke Chriſtians were than Recuſants,</note> otherwiſe they would paſſe vnto that companye which Ambroſe ſhould gather. Such accounte ought Chriſtians to make of auoiding hereticall ſynagogues. I will conclude therfore this matter of obedience with one ſhorte but in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uincible reaſon. You will haue it lawfull for obe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dience to goe to the Church.<note place="margin">An inuinci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ble reaſon, that it is not lawfull to go to the Church for obedience.</note> Than ſay I in this maner. Whatſoeuer is lawfull to be donne, that being by a Superiour commaunded, is a mortall ſinne to tranſgreſſe, or to omitte. But (as you de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fend) it is lawfull to goe to the Church for obedi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ence: therfore it is a mortall ſinne not to goe to the Church, when it is ſo commanded. See I pray you how many Preiſtes, Martyrs, men, woemen, and children, you condemne to hell: whileſt you ſeeke to maintaine your owne dangerouſe &amp; wil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full eſtate.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="10" type="section">
               <head>§. 10.</head>
               <p>Now let vs proceed vnto your feare,<note place="margin">The 9 ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of Feare.</note> which you make as one reaſon amongſt the reſt, but in deede is the wholl cauſe of your forſaking God. Becauſe you haue not perfectly learned his leſſon which ſaidI will teach you whom you ſhall feare. Feare
<pb n="42" facs="tcp:283:28"/>him, which when he hath killed the body, hath power to ſende both bodye and ſoule into Hell fier: yea verely I ſay vnto you feare him. You ſaye therfore that you doe as you doe, for feare, and not voluntarily. But nothing is a ſinne which is not donne voluntarily: Therfore in your action is no ſinne at all. Where if you had ſaid thus: that you doe what you do not voluntarily: but nothing not voluntarily donne is a ſinne: therfore what you doe is no ſinne: then had your argument bene good but your Maior falſe: for I would then ſay you did voluntarily what you did. But now in your firſt propoſition, where you ſay that you doe a thing for feare and yet not voluntarily: you in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>clude two thinges moſt repugnant in them ſelues. For it is impoſſible that a thing be donne onely for feare and not voluntarily.<note place="margin">Whatſoe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer is done for feare is voluntary.</note> And in thispoint we muſt begge helpe of heathen Philoſophers. For ſo hath feare darckened our countreis vnderſtanding, that the very principles of all morall actions and of goodnes or badnes in our doinges are called into queſtion. For what I pray you? if for feare of loa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſing your owne life, you vniuſtly take away an o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thers, becauſe of that feare, haue you not ſinned? If you haue ſinned, then haue you voluntarilye donne it. For<note n="*" place="margin">Aug l. 3 de lib. arb. c. 17 &amp; 18. et lib. de vera rel c. 14. lib. 1. retract. c. 13</note> aſinne is not a ſinne except it be voluntary. If IOSEPH for feare of his Ladies ſlaunder had ſatisfied her will: had he donne a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt his owne? Had y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> three childre<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> done againſt their owne will, if they had for feare ſacrificed or donne worſhip to the Idoll? And your ſelfe ſhall be iudge. When you goe to the Church doe you goe againſt your will? doth any man cary you? or
<pb n="43" facs="tcp:283:28"/>doe you cary your ſelfe in ſuch maner, becauſe of your feare, that you might not ſtay your ſelfe at home? Surely if feare be ſo mighty a Paſſion, that it taketh away the free gouernment of a mans wil, and not onely threatneth, but inferreth violenc to the outward members: in vaine did our Sauiour exhorte vs not to feare the world, in vaine did he with his heauenly inſtructions animate his Diſci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ples againſt incounters whatſoeuer of the aduerſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ries of his holy truth. But let vs decide this queſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on out of Philoſophy.<note place="margin">Onely vio<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lence taketh away volun<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tary.</note> In a reaſonable creature therfore nothing taketh away the nature of volun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tary, but conſtraint. Now coaction or conſtraint alwaies proceedeth of an extrinſecall cauſe vſing our members contrary vnto our owne will or de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſire. For as in a ſtone it is violence to be throwen vpwarde, becauſe it is contrary to the nature of the ſtone which would goe downeward of it ſelfe, and proceedeth from an externall cauſe which is ſaid violently to moue the ſtone: So in a reaſona<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ble creature which hath to gouerne it ſelfe by rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon, and knowledge, whatſoeuer is contrary to the inclination and propenſion of the will recei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued by the ſame knowledge: is violent and proper<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly called conſtraint,<note place="margin">The will cannot be conſtrained</note> and cannot be any way vſed but by an externall cauſe. For whenſoeuer the will it ſelfe agreeth vnto a thing for whatſoeuer reſpect, than is the action voluntary, becauſe it proceedeth from the will. Yea God himſelfe although he may moue the will of a man (for<note n="*" place="margin">Pro. 21</note> the Kinges hart is in the hand of God, and whither it pleaſeth him,<note place="margin">Aug. Tract. 26. in Ioan. Chryſoſt. <gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="1 letter">
                        <desc>•</desc>
                     </gap>o. 9. in Ioan.</note> he will incline it) yet doth he not violente the will at all, but ſweetly draweth it and allureth it: For if
<pb n="44" facs="tcp:283:29"/>he drew the will againſt the will: now a will were not a will. Moſt certaine then it is that the will it ſelfe can not be conſtrained, becauſe it is a will, and no way ſubiect vnto an externall mouer.</p>
               <p>Now the outwarde powers of man may no doubt be ſubiect vnto an outward ſtrengh,<note place="margin">The out<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>warde members of man may be conſtrai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned, but not by the will.</note> and moued againſt the will. For as Ariſtotle defineth<note n="*" place="margin">l. 3. Eth. c. 1</note> that is violence or conſtraint, whoſe begining is without the thing, the thing it ſelfe applying no endeuour therunto. But certainely we know that a mans hand, or foote, or anyother parte what<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſoeuer, yea the wholle body may be moued by an externall cauſe or begining; the hand, foote, or body, beeing not applyed therunto by the will, which is miſtreſſe of the wholle. And when this happeneth: then doe we ſay that action to haue bene donne violently and conſtrainedly. You goe therfore to the Church, if you go carried by force, pulled, drawne, finally ſo that your ſelfe apply not your members therunto: then was this a violent action againſt your will, and you haue not ſinned. But if your ſelfe once moue your members there<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>unto,<note place="margin">D. Tho. 1.2. q. 6. ar. 5 ad 2</note> yea ifyou giue an inward conſent to be ſo violented: although it be for feare of loſſe of goods and liuinges: although there ſtand a gallowes of purpoſe erected for you: although the Beadle of Bridewell come behinde you with his ſtaffe, fearce<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly and barbarouſly threatning you: than haue you moued your ſelfe, the begining of your action is within your ſelfe, if not the firſt motiue, which is outward daunger: yet the immediate beginning and naturall cauſe therof: you apply ſomewhat of your owne, which cannot be but from the will:
<pb n="45" facs="tcp:283:29"/>therfore is your action voluntary. For this cauſe doe both Philoſophers and Diuines conclude, that what is donne of feare, is alwaies ſimply and abſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lutely voluntary. For although in other times or with other circumſtances none would conſent vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to that which he doth for feare. yet with thoſe condicions being preſent, he doth abſolutely yeeld vnto the ſame. Wherefore concludeth S. Tho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mas, that wheras euery thing is properly ſaid to be ſuch as it actually is, not as it may be apprehen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded: that is abſolutely voluntary which is donne and conſented vnto for the preſent fearfull condi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion which it hath annexed, although as it is ima<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gined and apprehended without the ſame condi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion it would be reiected. He therfore which by conſtraint is violented, doth nothing, but onely ſuffereth: he which is moued for feare, becauſe he doth ſomewhat himſelfe, is not violented or con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtrained: but the particuler circumſtances conſide<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red, doth voluntarily what-ſoeuer hee doth: al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though without thoſe conditions it were vnuolun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tary. The humane lawes of diuerſe countreies for that power which the common wealth hath ouer our ciuill actions, doe commonly diſanull thoſe contractes which are made for feare: yet cannot all the lawes of the worlde bring to paſſe but theſe contractes muſt be voluntary albeit the lawe for to puniſhe the iuiuriouſe perſon doth make them voide. neither can feare or any autority make ſuch contract in him which is iniuried to be no ſinne, if it were of it ſelfe a ſinne to make it. You therfore may reſolue your ſelfe that your going to the Church is voluntary. And becauſe euery acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on
<pb n="46" facs="tcp:283:30"/>voluntary in a matter which of it ſelfe is a mor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tall ſinne, deſerueth euerlaſting damnation, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though it be donne for feare: acknowledge your ſinne, that you may the ſooner obtaine remiſſion. And for all this will I vtter ſomewhat more in this point, that you may ſee I conceale nothing which may ſtand for you, that if this action of going to the Church with heretickes were onely forbidden by poſitiue lawes of the Church: than when there were no ſcandall it were lawfull to vſe it: the Church like a moſt kinde mother neuer intending to bind vnto ſo great inco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ueniences as in our coun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trey by y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> omiſſion of the ſame action may enſew. But this to be no ſuch action as onely humane lawes doe reprooue; ſhall be proued belowe. it is ſufficient now to haue ſhewed, that onely feare cannot make it voluntary, and conſequently not iuſtifie it, if it be euill.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="11" type="section">
               <head>§. 11.</head>
               <p>But your reaſon following of your good inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion either to pray Catholickly,<note place="margin">The 10. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of a good inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion.</note> or to ſaue your wife and children and goodes or landes, is moſte friuolous. The end ſay you is that which maketh the action either good or badde: But my end is good: therfore the action alſo is not vnlawfull. Wherin I maruaile no more that you are become a new patrone of going to the Church:<note place="margin">This reaſon ſerueth for the defence of all vice.</note> for you haue taken vpon you the defence &amp; maintenance of all other wickednes. Teach I pray you the mur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>derer; to haue an intention of ſhewing his man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>hoode: the theefe, to deſire riches, that he may liue in his ould age honeſtly and truely in the com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon welth: the adulterer to procure amity and
<pb n="47" facs="tcp:283:30"/>frendſhippe in his neighboures ſamely: and then may you vpon ſuch intentions, I will not ſay diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>penſe with them, that they may ſeriouſly applye their trades: but perſuade them that which they doe to be ſound and perfect vertue.<note place="margin">Two kinds of intentio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>s.</note> There be ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore two kindes of endes, and likewiſe two ſortes of intentions in our actions. The firſt is an intrin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſecall end, which is the very obiect and motiue which the will deſireth: and that act of the will, by which we deſire to obtaine that end, is proper<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly called our intention.</p>
               <p>There is an other end extrinſecall vnto the acte and not alwaies pretended, when we doe not on<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly deſire that which is the immediate motiue of our deſire, but referring that to a farther purpoſe, deſire withall to obtaine the ſame. and this is alſo a kind of intention: but extrinſecall and acciden<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tary in our wholle action and is called a circum<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtance therof. An example of this you may haue in all actions. If a man determine to go to dinner: the very obiect, and motiue, and intrinſecall end of his deſire, that is of his intention, is to dine. But if he referre this his dinner vnto obedience, or vnto the glory of God, for whom he intendeth to keepe and increaſe hiscorporall ſtrength: theſe are extrinſecall endes or circumſtances of the firſt in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tention or end: and his immediate intention be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to dine, he referreth the ſame with a farther intention vnto thoſe endes. Now this intrinſecall end which we ſpake of as it giueth the nature and forme vnto the inward action: ſo doth it alſo giue what goodnes or badnes is in it. For if that obiect or motiue be of the owne nature conformable vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to
<pb n="48" facs="tcp:283:31"/>to reaſon, than is it a good action or deſire: If con<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>trary; contrary:<note place="margin">A good acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of it ſelfe may be cor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rupted by y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> circumſtan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces: but an euill action cannot be iuſtified by good circu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtances or intentions.</note> If indifferent, ſo that it hath in it ſelfe no certaine or determinate order vnto right reaſon: then is the action of the owne nature in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>different, neither good, nor badde. Yet doth not goodnes or badnes flow into an action onely by the nature of the immediate obiect or end of the ſame: but alſo by the extrinſecall end: yea by eue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry circumſtance, and euery meanes taken for the obtaining of the ſame firſt end or obiect. So that although the action be good of it ſelfe or indiffe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rent: yet if it be referred to a further end which is euill, or if any meanes vſed for the bringing to paſſe of the action it ſelfe be euill, or there wante any circumſtance of time, place, maner, or mea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſure neceſſary: than is the wholle action it ſelfe naught for ſome circumſtance. Euen in like man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner is the action it ſelfe naught, when it being vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lawfull is donne with all poſſible circumſtances or intention of whatſoeuer farther good.<note place="margin">Dion. c. 4. de diu. nom.</note> For the ge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nerall ground both of Philoſophers and Diuines cannot be infringed: that good is of the wholle &amp; intiere cauſe: but the euill is of euery particuler de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fect. Hence is it therfore euident: firſt, that al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though your remote intentions in going to the Church haue neuer ſo great colour of piety: yet that which immediatelye you doe which is to goe to the Church is your intention alſo: And that you as well intend to goe to the Church, although for thoſe extrinſecall endes: as hee which ſtealeth for to geue Almes intendeth to ſteale, and the diſſolute woeman which killeth her Infant for feare of geuing ſcandall, intendeth
<pb n="49" facs="tcp:283:31"/>the death therof Secondly that the immediate action of going to the Church being euill, it ca<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>not be iuſtified by any godly or lawfull circumſtance. Euen as if it were good of it ſelfe, yet might it be made euill by an euill circumſtance. For good re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quireth a perfect cauſe, &amp; euill is that which wan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth any part of the cauſe. Euen as a man is not a perfect man except he haue all his members per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fect: yet is he imperfect, if with all other good pro portion, he doe but looke awry.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="12" type="section">
               <head>§. 12.<note place="margin">The 11. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection of y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> nature of Churches.</note>
               </head>
               <p>As for your laſt reaſon, it is anſwered in one worde. The Churches are ours in ded But the heretickes ſeruice and company is not ours. Euen as if there were Idolatry or any filthy crime there practiſed, you had no right vnto the Idolatry or other ſinne, nor might be there preſent, for all your right to the Church. But if you haue right to the Church: why goe you thither at ſeruice time, or ſo that you may ſeeme to be at ſeruice?<note place="margin">Greg. l. 3. dial. c. 30. Hereticall Churches are Deuils lodgings.</note> is it not ſufficient at any other ſeaſon? O Sir it is not the Church which draweth you, but the ſeruice. And if you knew that Churches prophaned by heretikes haue other maner of inhabitants in them then the holy Angells. you would not be very haſty for de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uotion to go vnto them, euen when they be emp<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tye. But you ſhall heare what S. Hillary ſaith of thoſe which in his time wente to the Churches where heretickes were gathered, for loue vnto the Churches dedicated before vnto God.<note place="margin">Lib. cont. Auxent. circa. fin</note>
               </p>
               <p>Wickedly hath the loue of the walles poſſeſſed you, wickedly doe you reuerence the Church of God in houſes and buildings: wickedly vnder theſe
<pb n="50" facs="tcp:283:32"/>pretenſes doe you talke of peace. vnto me are more ſafe, the mountaines, lakes, priſons and donge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Where you may ſee a perfect example of our age, and how the moſt holy Fathers which haue liued in auncient times amongſt heretickes, accounted no ſmall matter the ioyning themſelues vnto theire deteſtable company. For they alwaies eſteemed it beſides a fauouring and exterior prote<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtation of their ſectes, a moſt ready way vnto the wholle ouerthrow of true religion. For the here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes haue alwaies endeuoured with ſhew of pie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty, to darken true piety:<note place="margin">The cauſe why here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes retain Churches.</note> and with maintaining ſome outward ſhewe of reuerend antiquitye, to blotte out of peoples memory the auncient truth it ſelfe. Such was the inuention of Idolatrous Hie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>roboam who made Iſraell to ſinne.</p>
               <p>Now ſaith he will the kingdome returne vnto the houſe of DAVID,<note place="margin">3, Reg. 12.</note> if this people doe aſcend to doe ſacrifice in the houſe of God in Hieruſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lem. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> And for this cauſe he deuiſed new Gods new preiſtes, and prophane temples. Euen ſo is it with you. For leaſt the people ſhould haue de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſire to reſorte to the true houſe of God in ſpirituall Hieruſalem: longing after Confeſſion, after Maſſe after holy Catholicke Sermons, and the whollevſe of Catholicke rites and ceremonies: you are fedde with reuerend Churches, with gay painted words, and ſeruice in the vulgar tongue, not for any af<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fection of piety, or inclination of vertue: (For who knoweth not how litle they ſeeke for piety, or de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſire for other reſpects to keepe Churches ſtanding:) but only to nouriſh the diſſention and maintaine the diuiſion of ISRAEL from IVDA; To this
<pb n="51" facs="tcp:283:32"/>end doe they furniſhe your Tables with ſuch diſh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>es, as are no more comparable with the Catholike dainties, than the Onions of Aegipt with the moſt delicate Manna of the Deſert.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="13" type="section">
               <head>§. 13.<note place="margin">THE SE<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>COND PARTE.</note>
               </head>
               <p>Hauing now anſwered ſufficiently (as I ſuppoſe vnto your obiections: (for other obiections which I muſt of force helpe you withall: I wil after bring forth:<note place="margin">Other ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iections are anſwered in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> progreſſe of this Trea<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tiſe.</note>) there reſteth the onely thing which I haue in this wholle diſcourſe ſuppoſed and taken as cer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine, in wihch in deed our wholle diſputation doth principally conſiſt: that is, to proue by ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary groundes, that to goe to the Church is an action of it ſelfe euill and iuſtifiable for no circum<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtance at all. which I haue hitherto ſuppoſed not bringing any argumentes therof, other then by an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwering your obiections muſt needes be inſinua<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted: becauſe it was not my part in this Epiſtle to proue the truth but to diſproue falſhood. Yet leaſt this letter of mine ſhould fall into ſome handes of thoſe who haue not ſeene ſuch learned diſcourſes as of this point heretofore haue bene ſette forth: I will briefly ſet downe ſome few reaſons amongſt ſo many, wherby I may ſhew this action of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to hereticall ſeruice to be no indifferent action, or ſuch as may be exerciſed without ſinne: but wholly forbidden and vnlawfull of it ſelfe.<note place="margin">The reaſon of the diffi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>culry which diuerſe make in this queſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.</note> which thing when I vndertake I know in how vncertaine and ſlippery a place I find my ſelfe. For although in my iudgement this matter may euidently be de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>duced out of Scriptures: yet are the ſcriptures wre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſted from our caſe to other ſenſes. Although we may conclude it out of the examples of holy Fa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thers:
<pb n="52" facs="tcp:283:33"/>yet are they interpreted of Idolatry and not of hereſie, or of being preſent at Idolatrous ſacrifi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces, not at hereticall ſeruice. Although we may alleage the grane example and ſeuere diſcipline of the wholle Church, euen ſince Chriſt his time, in all ages forbidding communication with heretiks: yet are we anſwered that thoſe were perfect times; in which as all maner of vertues, ſo all maner of ſeuerity did alſo floriſh; I know not what prero<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gatiue being attributed to our age. Wherfore al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though this were a matter fitte to be diſcuſſed out of Scriptures, Fathers, &amp; practiſe of Gods Church: yet will we referre the large allegations therof vnto other bookes, the learning and knowledge wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>of we are not able to reach vnto: Onely touching therof ſo much as we ſhall thinke neceſſary to for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tifie and confirme thoſe reaſons, which out of the lawe of nature &amp; of God we will bring to inferre our purpoſe. But firſt we muſt agree what wee meane by going vnto the Church.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="14" type="section">
               <head>§. 14.<note place="margin">What is ment by go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church.</note>
               </head>
               <p>Firſt therfore by going to Church with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes, we meane not that materiall action of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to that materiall place where heretickes haue theire ſeruice. For in this reſpect ſuch action is in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>different. Yea in any action in the worlde that which is materiall may be found at ſome time or other,<note place="margin">The materi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all of euery action may be indiffe rent.</note> and with ſome reſpect vnto reaſon which is the guide of all our actions; morally lawfull and good: though at other times and with other re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſpectes it be vnlawfull. For if we take that which is materiall or naturall in murder, which is to be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teaue a man of his life: as it is vnlawfull, when
<pb n="53" facs="tcp:283:33"/>order of iuſtice wanteth: So is it lawfull when the ſame order is obſerued. That alſo which is mate<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riall in adultery or in thefte, may be found in true matrimony, or in a mans owne good altogether lawful &amp; commendable: And yet is there none W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> will deny but that murder, adultery, thefte are of temſelues vnlawfull. The reaſon hereof is, for that actions are not morally good or badde but by that conformity or deformitye which they haue with reaſon. Wherfore diuerſe accidents and ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny varieties of reſpectes vnto reaſon belonging vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to one materiall acte:<note place="margin">The neceſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſary condi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tions, of morall ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iectes, are not circum<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtances but eſſentiall vn to the acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.</note> theſe are not now in reſpect of goodnes or badnes accidents, but belong vnto the very nature and forme of that acte, making different quallities either of goodnes or badnes: or in the one or the other diuerſe degrees &amp; kinds. For example: it is not a thing belonging vnto the naturall ſubſtance of the acte, whether the man W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is killed deſerue death, or no: whether it be ones owne wife, or no: whether the horſe be mine, or an others. But in the morall forme and nature therof, that is in reſpect of that conueniency which our actions ought to haue with reaſon: theſe con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ditions import very much, and belong vnto the ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry ſubſtance and forme of goodnes or badnes. yea in the very ſame kinde of theſte, as it is not a cir<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cumſtance but intrinſecall vnto the thing which is taken, that it is an other mans, when the will choo ſeth and intendeth the ſame: So the difference, of place is not a circumſtance but the very ſubſtance of the obiect; in as much as it is morall, and ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leeth the action ſacriledge when the will determi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neth to take from an holy place. And ſo may we
<pb n="54" facs="tcp:283:34"/>diſcourſe of other condicions of euery obiecte or action. In like maner muſt we reſolue of this acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of going to the Church. For when we ſay that going to the Church with heretickes is vnlawfull in it ſelfe: we meane not that materiall action co<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon to Catholicke and hereticke countreis: nor going to the Church with heretickes as it may be with other morall conditions which may guie it an other maner of conueniency or diſagreeing vnto reaſon:<note place="margin">What con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ditions are thoſe which make the going to he retickes ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice a mo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rall action and of it ſelfe vnlaw<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full.</note> but as it hath annexed ſuch conditions as wee knowe are in our countrey, with the which the goeing being quallified: is of it ſelfe altoge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther vnlawfull. Theſe conditions are, when one goeth for to be prefent at ſeruice: and ſo, that he may worthely ſeeme to go as others doe, with con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formity in religion, or preiudice, or contempt of Catholicke faith and vnity: which in one worde we may well terme, an orderly going to hereticall ſeruice.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="15" type="section">
               <head>§. 15.<note place="margin">Some man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing not re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>prehended</note>
               </head>
               <p>Wherby we exclude thoſe which goe to the Church for a temporall end of ſome particuler duety required by the Prince, not in reſpect of he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticall ſeruice, but of that which is due at other time and places. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> For ſuch, ſo long as their ſeruice is knowne, and ſuch action although indifferent in it ſelfe is not of them exacted in contempt of re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion,<note place="margin">Going with the Prince ſee §. 7. and §. 16.</note> or vſed by them to giue the world to vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtand that they goe to the Church: or alleaged by them to proue that they be not recuſantes: Such I ſay, are iudged by diuerſe learned men not to goe to ſeruice as vnto ſeruice, neither to obey the Prince in reſpect of ſeruice, which neither the Prince in
<pb n="55" facs="tcp:283:34"/>commaunding doth reſpect, nor they in going. all contrary vnto them, which only for obedience goe to the Church, where the end of the precept and of the going is ſeruice it ſelfe.<note place="margin">Going for obedience ſee §. 9.</note> But they are e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſteemed to vſe that action as a duety common to all places, and no more intended in the Church than other where: And ſo all ſignification of con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formity to be taken away; and this to be onely ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rerially to go to the Church without that forme and morallity which otherwiſe it hath Theſe I ſay I exclude. not meaning to ſette downe my opinion therein, whether it be euill of it ſelfe ſo to go with the Prince: or if it be not, whether ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall may be ſeparated from it or no: whether they may ſtay there after their particuler ſeruice is fini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhed: whether ordinary attendance vpon the Prin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces perſon be ſuch a ſufficient cauſe or no: and ſuch other like: W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> I will leaue vnto more learned perſons to diſcuſſe, and to ſuch courtiers if there be any to aſſertaine their conſciences in, before they aduenture. This one thing am I aſſured of, that ſuch perſons are in conſcience bound to leaue the court if they may without manifeſt daunger of in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>curring the Princes diſgrace, not in reſpect of their recuſancy (for that they muſt willingly ſuſteine) but in reſpect of their want of that temporall duety which by reaſon of their calling or the Princes fa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uour is expected from them.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> We exclude alſo thoſe which by chance or of purpoſe, not for diſſimulation,<note place="margin">Going through y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church.</note> but ſome other ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary end, go through the Church, without any ſhewe of reuerence at all: for there wanteth the aforeſaide conditions.</p>
               <pb n="56" facs="tcp:283:35"/>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> Alſo ſuch as with heretickes go to Catholicke ſeruice, to a Catholicke company. For ſuch goe not to heretickes ſeruice.<note place="margin">Going to Maſſe with an hereticke in a catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke Church.</note> Yet I ſay to a Catholicke company: for if the company were of heretickes gathered together as ſuch: than although there were Maſſe: yet were this to go to heretickes ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice, as we ſaide aboue. The like I ſay if one went to heare an hereticke preach, whome he priuately knew to be an hereticke: if ſuch an hereticke prea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ched in a Catholicke company, becauſe he is Pa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtour of the place, or thought by the Magiſtrates &amp; people to be Catholike. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="4"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Hearing a ſecrett here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon.</note> For although this hearing the ſermon may in other reſpectes be euill, as for daunger of infection: yet is not this formally to go to the Church with heretickes: the wholle compa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nye beeing Catholicke, <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Diſturbers.</note> and the name of ſeruice, or Church being alwaies taken of the company to which ſuch ſeruice is iudged to belong.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="6"/> Such alſo are excluded, as are maniſeſt diſtur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bers or mockers of ſuch ſeruice,<note place="margin">Curiouſe beholders in an indif<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ferent citty.</note> and knowne on<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly for ſuch reſpecte to come thither, not that they may ſhew any liking or conformity at all.</p>
               <p>Alſo thoſe, which in a Catholicke or indiffe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rent citty doe curiouſly enter to behold the maner and behauiour of hereticall conuenticles,<note place="margin">See §. 36. n. 5.</note> ſo that they ſhew no reuerence or religious and ceremoni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe preſence.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="7"/> Finally ſuch as ſitting at the table with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes are preſent at their grace, ſo that they aun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwere not, or pray not with them,<note place="margin">Preſence at the here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tikes grace.</note> or it be not a formall ſeruice before ſitting downe. For theſe are not at heretickes ſeruice, and the end of their com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ming is knowne to be to refreſh their body: nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther
<pb n="57" facs="tcp:283:35"/>are they bound to withdraw theire preſence being altogether temporall. and the putting off their hatte is vnderſtood either an acte of ciuility, others being bare: or an exterior ſigne of reuerence of his owne thankes geuing vnto God, wich be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cometh euery Chriſtian after meate.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="16" type="section">
               <head>§. 16.<note place="margin">Vnlawfull going</note>
               </head>
               <p>We doe not yet exclude from the vnlawfulnes of this action ſuch as although they go not to the Church yet haue ſeruice at home, either by a mi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſter or without. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Seruice at home.</note> For it is not the Church but the ſeruice and profeſſion of conformity which is reproued: which alwaies is vnderſtood whan the forme of heretickes praier is obſerued. Yet would I not condemne (neither trewlye allowe) thoſe which without any miniſter gather all their houſe together to their priuate deuotions, or haue one of the famely, to rehearſe in the name of all, ſome Catholicke praiers, not in an hereticall forme, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though all the perſons be not Catholicke: ſo that this be not donne for contempt, or with a ſhew of vnity in ſchiſme or hereſy. For this is not hereticall ſeruice: and without ſuch preiudice of Catholicke vnity, one may pray with heretickes as with any other perſon in mortall ſinne or exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Going with the Prince &amp; denying themſelues to be Recu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſants.</note> Nor we exclude thoſe which going to the Church with the Prince (if ſuch going be lawfull) alleage that going for a ſhew of conformity and of abſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lute going to the Church, when they are called into queſtion. For as their going cannot be iuſli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fied, if it doe ſignifie conformity in religion: So if they ſay that it was vſed for the ſame conformi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty: it muſt needes be anvnlawfull diſſimulation:
<pb n="58" facs="tcp:283:36"/>For in thoſe actions which ſignifie religion, it is all one to do the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> and to ſay they were done. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Making others to thinke that they go.</note> And ther fore thoſe W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> any way giue others to vnderſtand that they go to the Church, geuing probable cauſe of ſuch eſtimation themſelues, are no way to be excuſed: although they may, geuing no ſufficient cauſe permitte that others ſay or thinke what they liſt. The like of thoſe which ſay that they haue bene at the heretickes ſeruice, <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="4"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Saying that they haue gone or wil go.</note> or that they will go. For ſuch ſpeaches imply conformity in religion, and are ſo commonly vnderſtood. Hitherto ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>partaine thoſe, which going to the Church, ſay they go for obedience. For ſuch obedience is but an extrinſecall motiue or end: <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Going for obedience. ſee §. 9.</note> the very forme of ſuch action being to go to Church, &amp; principally intended in the commandement as we haue ſaid aboue. And therfore by the commandement the ſignificatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of religion, or contempt of the Church is not taken away, but rather increaſed. And the like is not in going to the Church for ſome parti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>culer ſeruice of temporall duety vnto the Prince. For here the going to the Church is not formally reſpected,<note place="margin">See §. 7. and 15.</note> but only in as much as it happeneth that a mere temporall ſeruice is to be vſed in the Church as well as in other places. Euen as if it ſhould hap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pen thathe Prince in ſome extremity of corporall diſeaſe, would for particuler deuotion go to the Church: and neceſſity ſhoulde require that the Phiſition, Nurſe, or Apothecary ſhould their at<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tend for their ordinary ſeruices.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="6"/> Neither are they excuſed which ſay they go to the Church,<note place="margin">Going with out inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding to pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſe religio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>.</note> yet not intending any ſignification in religion. for this action of it ſelfe ſignifying religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on,
<pb n="59" facs="tcp:283:36"/>on, when for ſome particuler circumſtance, the ſignification it ſelfe is not taken away, as in the ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſes aforſaid: It is much alike as if a man hanging vpp an Iuye garland at his dore as though he had wine to ſell: ſhould anſwere ſuch as offer to buy wine, that although there be a garland hanged vp: yet he had no ſuch meaning as to ſhew that he had wine: or if a man ſhould with very angry and fierce countenance call ſome perſon of high digni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty euen before his face, by all maner of opprobri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ous names: and being conuented for the ſame, ſhould ſay he ment not as he ſaid. For although God himſelfe in this action of going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church knoweth very well our meaning: yet doth it ſigni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſy vnto men as it ordinarily doth at other times, and by others. And rather men may doubt of the true meaning of his proteſtation if he make any,<note place="margin">Of a Prote<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtation. ſee §. 31. &amp; § 35</note> then of his outward action: And whether his pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teſtation be ſincere or no: certaine it is y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> there is in the action, all ſignification ſette apart, at ſuch time &amp; place a very great contempt of religion, and of that perſon to whoſe diſhonour the ſignification would tend that is of God himſelfe. For who doubt eth but that if one ſhould co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>tumeliouſly name his Prince before his face, although both the Prince &amp; y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> wholle court knew his meaning to be otherwiſe, yet if ſuch opprobrious wordes were enforced by a forreine enemy for contempte of the Prince,<note place="margin">A very fite example a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt Prote teſtation.</note> ſuch action would be deemed treaſon? Wherefore that this wholle matter may be perfectly concei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued: Let vs imagine that vnto AVGVSTVS the Emperour came 4. ſeuerall perſons: the firſt con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tumeliouſly, and alſo from his very harte, ſaieth
<pb n="60" facs="tcp:283:37"/>AVGVSTVS is an vniuſt Prince. the ſecond con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tumeliouſly alſo, although againſt his conſcience, vſeth the like ſpeaches: yet doth he not ſeeke to make his co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſcience known vnto the Emperour, or vnto his courtiers being preſent. The third maketh in deed his mind open vnto his maieſty and court, that he thinketh not ſo vndoubtedly of him: yet contemptuouſly, either to pleaſe an aduerſary of his, or elſe moued with greater feare of that aduer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſary than of the Emperour, he vttereth the very ſame. The fourth not after any of theſe maners, but ſent by a very loiall ſubiect of the Emperours, bringeth him this relation: that a forreine Prince or Lord forgetting his alleageance or duety, hath publikely ſaid of his Emperiall maieſty: AVGVS<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>TVS is an vniuſt Prince. Moſt euident it is, that the three firſt hath formally vſed and moſt traite<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rouſly the aforeſaid wordes. but the laſt only ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>terially &amp; without any crime at all. Now to apply this example vnto our purpoſe: there are three kind of men which wickedly and traiterouſly vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to God and his Church go to hereticall ſeruice. The firſt is the hereticke himſelfe: who in this acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on both ſignifieth &amp; inwardly meaneth a falſe re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion The ſecond is the diſſembling ſciſmatike, who ſignifieth it, and yet in his hart thincketh it not. The third is the ſame fearfull ſchiſmaticke who proteſteth that he meaneth not to ſhew li<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>king of a falſe religion, yet neither can his prote<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtation be knowne to all which ſee his facte: and perhapps alſo he is not beleeued in the ſame, wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>as he may aſwell lye in his wordes as in his action: and yet (although he obtained ſo much that he
<pb n="61" facs="tcp:283:37"/>might be beleeued) cannot be excuſe himſelfe from contempt and derogation vnto Catholicke truth. The fourth onely vſeth the action materially, with out any ſignification of falſhood or contempt of truth at all, as are thoſe whom we haue excuſed before. For as in wordes, which are principally inſtituted for to repreſent the meaning of the hart, there may be the materiall ſound of them, with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>out the ſignification, which is the forme therof as when one repeateth the wordes of an other; al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though they were blaſphemous: So, and much more may there be in actions or outward ſignes, which are not ordinarily ſo determined to ſignify, as wordes. So may a man cary an Iuy buſh vpon his backe, home for the fire, &amp; neuer be thought to pretend ſelling of wine:<note place="margin">Bannes. 2.2.</note> And a comedy plaier counterfeite Idolatry before an Idoll, without any formall or ſinfull meaning therof.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="7"/> Neither for all this is going to the ſeruice of he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes, not euill in it ſelfe:<note place="margin">All kind of diſſimulati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on in this point.</note> For we ſpeake of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to their ſeruice formally, that is when there is annexed vnto the materiall therof a ſignification, contempt, or preiudice of religion.</p>
               <p>Finally, hereby it appeareth that wee exclude not any from the ſinfulnes of the deed, who any way guie ſhew, or vſe any kind of diſſimulation in theſe weighty matters. Such are thoſe which go, but pray not there: or pray by them ſelues: thoſe which by their owne procuring or conſent, are put in the booke of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municants or of married folkes, or of ſuch like. Such as gette licence from the Arches to be married where they will: Such as ſend their children to be chriſtened by miniſters,
<pb n="62" facs="tcp:283:38"/>or ſay that the miniſter chriſtened them: woemen which cauſe the miniſter to come to their houſe with his booke and ſurples, as though he ſhould Church them: thoſe which receiue comfort of miniſters at their death, or in ſicknes: for thoſe<note n="*" place="margin">c. Filij De Haereticis in ſexto.</note> are adiudged by the Canons of the Church euen heretickes, and ſo their goods confiſcate after their death: thoſe which go with coarſes to Burialls, if they withdraw not them ſelues when ſeruice of the Buriall beginneth: nor ſuch as to ſaue them ſelues from the danger of the law, cauſe a Catholicke Preiſt to go into the Church to preach, therby to make their neighbours to ſay or thinke that they go to the Church: yea and without ſuch intent, if they go ſo that they ſeeme to go to hereticall ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice: nor thoſe which are married by a Catholicke Prieſt with the communion booke, or otherwiſe, that it may ſeeme they be married conformably: thoſe which hauing ſecrett Pewes or cloſettes loo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>king into the Church, cauſe ſome other to go thi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther, that them ſelues may be deemed preſent: or thoſe W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> cauſe the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſelues to be caried to the church: for al ſuch haue not lied to me<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> but<note n="*" place="margin">Act. 5.</note> vnto god. And although we are not bound alwaies to confeſſe our religion, yet are we bound neuer to deny it, or to giue probable occaſion to others ſo to eſteme of vs. although without ſuch occaſion geuen wee may permitte them to thinke what they liſt.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="17" type="section">
               <head>§. 17.<note place="margin">Whether this doctrine be ſcrupu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lous.</note>
               </head>
               <p>Neither let any man marueile at theſe manifold downe falls intoſinne, or eſteeme vs to ſcrupulous, or the way of ſaluation to ſtraite. For this is that ſtraines of the gate<note n="*" place="margin">Mat. 7.</note> which leadeth vnto life: this
<pb n="63" facs="tcp:283:38"/>is the combate betweene the world and Chriſt,<note n="*" place="margin">10.16.</note> neuer agreeing in one: this is that<note n="*" place="margin">Pſal. 18.</note> vnſported law of God, which not W<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſtanding conuerteth ſoules, and maketh them deſpiſing the delightes of the fleſh, yea &amp; the extreme vſages of the world, only cleaue vnto Chriſt: and (that which is a moſt hap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>py thing) to remaine<note n="*" place="margin">Luc. 22.</note> with him in his tribulations, in the leaſt iote not ſwaruing from his holy will. Maruaile not though hereticks diſſemble amongſt Catholikes, though they ſhew no difficulty of ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>king al demonſtratio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of feined piety, contrary vnto their owne conſciences, whileſt they receiue our Sacramentes, profeſſe our doctrine, and ſeeme to deteſt all hereſies: They want togither with true religion all conſtant proſeſſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of that which they e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſteeme for truth. Treacheries. diſſimulations, falſe worſhippings, dubleneſſe, deceite, and all man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner of fallacy, is farre from thoſe hartes which em. brace Chriſtian verety. One remedy there is which may deliuer you from this preciſenes.<note place="margin">An eaſie way to a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uoid all ſeru<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ples herein</note> Be at vtter defiance with Schiſme and Hereſie: Lett all the worlde vnderſtand, that in the leaſt dangerouſe pointe you will take the ſecure part, and no way ſhrinke from your duety towards God: than ſhall you certainly auoide the diuerſe ſnares of conſci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ence, with which you may otherwiſe be entang<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>led, and perhaps be left in more ſetled quiet in the world, which ordinarily moleſteth them moſte, which moſt ſeeke to flatter it. This aſſure your ſelfe of, that as you cannot too ſoone flye from places ſuſpected of peſtilence: So cannot you be too curiouſe of ſhu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ning whatſoeuer hath the leaſt ſauour of ſchiſme and hereſie.</p>
               <pb n="64" facs="tcp:283:39"/>
               <p>And leaſt you may for want of a right perſuaſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of your duety, doe amiſſe: compare alwaie: the caſe of going to the Church,<note place="margin">A rule to know how farre we may go in this pointe.</note> vnto the rece<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uing the co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munion, and doing facrifice, or being preſent at ſacrifice vnto Idolls. And what you may doe, or ſay you haue donne, or will doe, or what you may diſſemble in one, you may in the other. For I will ſhew hereafter, that although there be degrees amongſt them, yet there is ſinne commit<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted in them all alike.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="18" type="section">
               <head>§. 18.</head>
               <p>Hauing than hitherto declared our full mea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ning in this queſtion, and whome we exclude or include therin: Let vs beginne to handle the mat<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter, ſcholaſtically as I ſaid before: as for fruitfull examples of auncient ages, and pithy ſentences of the doctours of the Church, and deuout conceites and exhortations vnto that which is neceſſary in ſo weighty a pointe of Chriſtian religion: I leaue the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> vnto the three bookes,<note place="margin">The booke of Schiſme.</note> which learnedly, deuoutly, and largly intreate therof in our owne tongue. My purpoſe is onely to preſſe you with ſound argu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mentes, and ſo to incloſe you within the bandes of moſt firme reaſon,<note place="margin">The reaſons of refufall.</note> that you ſhall neither eſcape my handes, nor being once in them be wreſted from me.</p>
               <p>We muſt therfore out of the ſure and ſtedfaſt groundes of ſound Diuinity,<note place="margin">The colo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>latory letter.</note> proue that the vſuall going vnto the Church with heretickes in Eng<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>land, is altogithtr of it ſelfe vnlawfull: hauing an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nexed vnto it as ſignification of falſe religion, a de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>naill, contempt, diſhonour, and preiudice of the truth which doe geue the forme and nature vnto
<pb n="65" facs="tcp:283:39"/>ſuch going, and ſo make it that by to accident or circumſtance in the world it may be iuſtified This will we deduce out of the nature and quality of fiue principall vertues neceſſarily appertaining vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to Chriſtian duety.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="19" type="section">
               <head>§. 19.<note place="margin">Euery Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian is bound to profeſſe his faith at ſome times.</note>
               </head>
               <p>The firſt of theſe vertues, is an exteriour con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſion of faith: to which euery Chrſtian is bound in two fortes. For firſt there is an affirmatiue pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cept, which commandeth vs to confeſſe our faith, and ſhew outwardly that which we beleeue. and to this are we bound, ſometimes in reſpecte of o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther vertues, ſometimes in reſpect of faith it ſelfe. In reſpect of other vertues: as of religion, which is a vertue to which it belongeth to yeeld honour vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to God: not onely with the mind eſteeming him our cheife Lorde and finall end,<note place="margin">Damaſc. l. 4. c. 13.</note> and ſubmitting our ſelues vnto him as the ſoueraigne ruler of our ſoules: but alſo with our body* and exteriour actions (wheras wee conſiſt as well of bodye as of ſoule) exhibiting vnto him outward reuerence in praier, thankſgeuing: ſacraments and ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies of religion. Which exteriour actions alwaies being a profeſſion of faith, it is a cleare caſe, that ſometimes in reſpect of religion we are bound to this exteriour acte of faith, which we call confeſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of faith. And this bond in reſpect of religion taketh place, ſo ofte as the holy Church bindeth vs vnto any acte of religion, as of hearing Maſſe, confeſſion, receiuing, baptiſme, extreeme vnction or other ſuch like, or when there may happen any neceſſity, either of our neighbour, or of our ſelues, or of the honor of God, or ſinguler co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mon profit.
<pb n="66" facs="tcp:283:40"/>To this confeſſion we are alſo bound ſometimes in reſpect of charity to wardes our neighbour.<note place="margin">A man is bound to profeſſe his faith for y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> charity to<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wardes his neighbour.</note> As whan this is a neceſſary remedy to hinder the per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſion of others in faith and religion, or any great ſcandall in this behalfe. As we reade of diuerſe Saintes, who ſeing Chriſtians in torments ready to relent, comforting them with holſome and ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary counſell: haue them ſelues confeſſed their owne faith, and togither with charity towardes their neighbour ſhewed their faith towardes God, for wihch they haue bene rewarded euen with Martyrdome.<note place="margin">Chriſtening of children a great bond.</note>
               </p>
               <p>And here can I not conceale a thing as ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary for the good of my countrey, as any other thing without which we cannot be ſaued. It hap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>peneth not ſeldome that in childbirth the litle In<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fant is in manifeſt danger of death. The midwife and others aſſiſting either for ignorance, malice or for feare of the inſtrumentes<note n="*" place="margin">Commo<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ly againſt the 9. Iniuncti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons ſuch are now trou<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bled by the ſpiritualty.</note> of the Diuell, which ſeeketh to take away that onely remedy of ſalua<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion which our poore &amp; moſt miſerable countrey hath retained: doth not care to Chriſten the ſame. Now whatſoeuer other man or woeman there pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent yea the<note n="*" place="margin">30. q. 1. c. Ad limina.</note> father or mother in ſuch neceſſity, is bound although manifeſt death woulde enſew: vnder paine of mortall ſinne, that is of eternall damnation if they repent not, to Chriſten or cauſe to be chriſtened the aforeſaide Infant. wher by it happeneth that in ſuch fact they conſeſſe this moſt certaine point of Catholicke verety, that no Infant can be ſaued without Baptiſme. And in this bond are included ſchiſmatikes &amp; heretickes themſelues: who hauing this beliefe, are alſo bound to ſhew
<pb n="67" facs="tcp:283:40"/>the ſame in like neceſſities.</p>
               <p>Some other may be bound hereunto by reaſon of Iuſticke, as thoſe which are by office appointed to teach others. For ſuch are bound euen with pe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rill of their owne death to inſtruct theire flocke, ſo therwithall vttering their owne beliefe.</p>
               <p>But in reſpect of the very vertue of Faith it ſelfe this outward confeſſion is neceſſary. firſt,<note place="margin">Whan is a man ordina<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>rily bound to ſhew his faith.</note> whan any man by concealing and not confeſſing his faith, ſhould be thought to deny the ſame. Se<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>condly, in Baptiſme, where an open profeſſion therof is made. Thirdly, when generally the faith were in greate hazard or perill of ſubuerſion. Saint THOMAS intreating of this matter geueth this rule of the obligation of this precept, ſaying:<note place="margin">2.2. q. 3. ar. a</note> That a man is bound vnto the exteriour confeſſion of his faith, when by the omiſſion therof there ſhold be withdrawen dew honour from God, or profitt to our neighbour: as ſaith he, if any man being demaunded of his ſaith, ſhoulde holde his peace, and therby it ſhould be thought either that he had not faith, or that the Catholicke faith were not trew, or others by his ſilence ſhould be auerted from the faith: for in ſuch caſes the conſeſſion of our faith is of neceſſity to ſaluation. Thus Saint THOMAS. The ground of this doctrine hither<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to ſett downe, is the infallible rule of S. PAVL,<note place="margin">Ro. 10.</note> W<hi rend="sup">t</hi> hart it is belecued vnto iuſtice, but with mouth confeſſion is made vnto ſaluation.</p>
               <p>But of this kind of affirmatiue precept we nee<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded not here to intreate, ſaue that partly for the ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſity therof in our countrey I thought it charita<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ble not to omitt to ſaye thus much: Partly alſo I
<pb n="68" facs="tcp:283:41"/>thinke it profitable for the better vnderſtanding of that which ſhall follow: But moſt of all for that I deſire to engraffe in euery ones mind a great con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>conceit of the excellency of faith, &amp; what account we ſhould make of the confeſſion therof.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="20" type="section">
               <head>§. 20.</head>
               <p>Now there is concerning this very ſame pointe of confeſſion of faith,<note place="margin">A man is al<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>waies bou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>d not to deny his faith.</note> a kind of negatiue precept, forbidding vs euer to deny either in word or deed our faith. For ſo is there in all affirmatiue pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cepts included alſo a negatiue. As in the precepts of louing God and honouring our Parents which are affirmatiue, there is implied a negatiue precept of not hating God, or diſhonouring our Parents. And as the affirmatiue precepts doe not bind vs at all inſtants to fulfill them: So doe the negatiue at euery moment bind vs not to breake them. For at no ſeaſon may a man ſteale, wherby he ſhoulde tranſgreſſe a negatiue precept: And yet at all ſea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſons is not a man bound to pray, to faſt, to geue almes, to honour his father, which are affirmtiue commaundements, but in time and place conue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nient. This precept therfore of neuer denying our faith,<note place="margin">Mat. 10. Luc. 9 2. Tim. 2. Mat. 26. Aug. l. cont. mend c 6. Theophil. in Luc. 12. Leo. ſer. 9 de Paſſ. Do.</note> alwaies bindeth vnto mortal ſinne. For who denieth Chriſt, ſhall be denied by him: who is aſhamed of Chriſt; of him alſo will Chriſt be a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhamed: and this was the ſinne of S. PETER for which he wept ſo bitterly: For he neuer loſt his in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward faith as S. Auguſtine and others doe affirme but only ſinned againſt y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> exteriour confeſſion ther of, as we may manifeſtly gather by the promiſe of Chriſt that his faith ſhould not faile. Againſt this precept may a man ſinne not onely in worde, by
<pb n="69" facs="tcp:283:41"/>ſaying that he knoweth not whether any one point of faith be trew or falſe:<note place="margin">A man may deny his faith by deeds aſwel as by words Admitting of conſere<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ce</note> by offering to conferre w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> heretickes as to be inſtructed by them, ſo going from the ſchoole of his maſter Chriſt, and of his miſtres the trew Church: by ſaying he is a Turke or Proteſtant, or no Chriſtian or Catholicke: or by vſing ſuch wordes as may make others to con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceiue, that he is no Chriſtian or Catholike, at ſuch time as he is asked, although the wordes of them ſelues be indifferent: But alſo in facte, or in any ſigne which ſheweth that which in wordes might be falſly or vnlawfully vttered. This doth S. Hie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rome teach. neither muſt we thinke, ſaith he,<note place="margin">in ep. ad Tit c. 1</note> that in the day of iudgement thoſe onely ſhall be deni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ed by the ſonne of God, which in Martyrdome haue denied Chriſt: but all thoſe alſo by whoſe worke, or ſpeach, or thought, Chriſt being de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nied,<note place="margin">Ser. de Abra ham.</note> denieth: or being confeſſed, confeſſeth. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> And Saint Ambroſe not onely in falſe wordes, but alſo in diſſembled workes a lye is found. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> And euen as the inwarde diſſenting from trew faith is either inward infidelity, Apoſtaſy, or hereſie: ſo the outward ſhew of a falſe faith,<note place="margin">Exteriout. hereſy.</note> or denying the trew faith, is called exteriour infidelity, or exterior hereſy and apoſtaſy. And ſo were alwaies thoſe which had outwardly donne any acte of infidelity in the primatiue Church thought by all Fathers to haue denied their faith.<note place="margin">Cypr l. 2. ep. 7.</note>
               </p>
            </div>
            <div n="21" type="section">
               <head>§. 21.</head>
               <p>Than out of this wholle moſt certaine diſcourſe will we thus frame our argument.<note place="margin">Going to heretickes ſeruice is ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teriour he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reſy.</note>
               </p>
               <p>The being preſent with heretickes at theire ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice in ſuch outward ſhew, as is nothing diuerſe
<pb n="70" facs="tcp:283:42"/>from the heretickes them ſelues: is an exteriour act of hereſy, and conſequently a profeſſion of here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſye, and deniall of Catholicke religion.</p>
               <p>Moſt manifeſt therfore is it, that ſuch preſence is of it ſelfe vnlawfull, and a mortall ſinne.</p>
               <p>But lett vs proue our Antecedent. Such pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſence is a ceremonious and religious acte, applyed vnto a falſe congregation and religion. But euery ceremony is an exteriour acte or profeſſion of that faith and religion to which it is applied: therfore is ſuch preſence a profeſſion of Proteſtants religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.</p>
               <p>That ſuch preſence is a ceremonious and religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ous acte,<note place="margin">Going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church is a ceremony. L. 10. ciu. c. 6.</note> S. Auguſtine ſhall witneſſe. who expreſſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lye teacheth that whatſoeuer worke is donne, that with holy ſociety wee may cleaue vnto God, is a kind of ſacrifice: which truely cannot be without a religious ceremony. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> 
                  <note place="margin">It ſignifieth a ſociety of Godlines.</note> And what I pray you is the end of coming togither in Churches in all mens opinion, but for to cleaue vnto God with holy ſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ciety? than muſt the coming thither of heceſſity be a ceremony. And of what religion or ſociety but of DATHAN and ABYRON, of ſuch as DAVID did deteſt,<note place="margin">Pſal. 25.</note> whan hee ſaied I hate the Church of the malignant, and with the wicked will I not ſitt? therfore in this ceremony is implied a profeſſion of hereſy. Neither is it ſufficient to ſay that your meaning is not to make any ſuch pro<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>feſſion, but onely to go after a prophane ſorte: or to vſe a lawfull ceremony of your owne religion: for that is the meaning of wordes and ſignes and actions, which either their own nature or the com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mon vſe of men hath impoſed, not that w<hi rend="sup">e</hi> your
<pb n="71" facs="tcp:283:42"/>ſelfe would intend: neither can you by this word (Mountaine) make others to vnderſtand water; nor by (Fier) an houſe: nor by a (horſe) a man: al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though you would frame vnto your ſelfe neuer ſo many CHIMERAS and falſe imaginations of the ſame in your braine.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> Beſides the being preſent at Catholicke ſeruice is a ceremony of Catholicke religion:<note place="margin">Preſence at Catholicke ſeruice is ce<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>remonious.</note> Therfore the being preſent at heretickes ſeruice is a ceremony of hereſy.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> Moreouer S. Auguſtine teacheth that no reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion can be begonne or maintained without cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>monies:<note place="margin">A principall ſigne of re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion. l. 19. cont. Fauſt. c. 11</note> therfore cannot we ſhew our religion to God without the ſame. But wherin doth our re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion ſhew it ſelfe ſo much as in going to the Church on the holy daies, wherin conſiſteth the very fulfilling of the 3. co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mandement? therfore is this a ceremony of our religion. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="4"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Holy daies are obſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued eſpeci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ally by go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Further alſo. the Church in the co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>maundement of the keeping of holy daies, which no doubt is a ceremony of Chriſtian religion, doth preſcribe vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to vs the maner therof, and bindeth vs to no other obſeruance than to be peeſent at Maſſe: at the w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> Diuine Sacrifice whoſoeuer is preſent, although without any attention or deuotion which is dew: yet hath he donne an exteriour act of religion com<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>maunded: yet ſinned for want of the inward de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uotion which he ſhould haue ioined thereunto. But the ſame is found in the preſence at hereticall ſeruice. Therfore is ſuch preſence ceremonious and religious: Neither can you excuſe your ſelfe with ſaying that you are not attentiuely and deuoutely preſent, becauſe there wanteth your goodwill and
<pb n="72" facs="tcp:283:43"/>affection: For there is an inward acte of religion as I touched before and an outward,<note place="margin">Inward and outward actes of reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion.</note> and ſome<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>times the one and the other ioined togither. Now this is an exteriour action of religion although it want the inward forme: and that is the thing w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> we purpoſed to proue that it is an outward acte of religion.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> Againe: in all ſortes of religion there be diuerſe kindes of ceremonies.<note place="margin">Compari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon with other kind of ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies.</note> Some doe conſiſt in hallo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wed thinges as Water, Oyle, Aſhes, Palmes, Ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtimentes. Other in time, as in Holy daies, Vigils Faſtings, Lent or ſuch like. And in like maner doth there ſome ceremonies conſiſt in places: as in Churches, Churchyardes, Chappells. Others are found in diuerſe obſeruances, as we ſee were kepte in the ould lawe of MOYSES. Now to vſe the other ceremonies is alwaies a ſigne of that religion vnto which they belong as the keeping of Satur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>day, of IVDAISME: the eating of ſwines fleſh, of GENTILISME: the abſteining from certain meates, of MANICHISME: the keeping of the Catholicke Faſtes and daies, of ſome kind of affe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ction to Catholicke religion: And why I pray you ſhall not the place being ceremonious, with the ceremonious action vſed therin, and the ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nious time withall, of the Sonday, or holy day, be a ſigne of religion, of that religion I ſay which v<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeth the ſame,<note place="margin">Ceremonies of places leſſe indiffe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rent than others 2.2. q. 85. ar. 3.</note> and commandeth the ſame, and which there as a diſtinct common welth from all others is gathered togither? And this reaſon in ce<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>remoniouſe places, hath more force than in any other ſortes of ceremonies. For as the Diuines doe excellently teach, Religion being a vertew which
<pb n="73" facs="tcp:283:43"/>exhibiteth honour and reuerence vnto god, ſome<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>times it happeneth that this vertew commaundeth vnto other vertues &amp; ordaineth their actes to Gods honour: As is to faſt, not onely for the puniſh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of the body, but alſo for the honor of God, to geue almes, to pay debtes, to viſitt Pupills and widdowes for Gods honour and ſuch like,<note place="margin">Iac. 1.</note> which properly belong to other vertues, but are by religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on as it were commaunded and directed vnto the end of religion. But there are other proper actes w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> onely belong to religion, and not to other vertues: Such as haue no other praiſe (as S. THOMAS ſpeaketh) but that they are donne for the reuerence of God. And theſe are moſt properly actes of reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion. Of this ſort are ſacrifices, kneeling, knoc<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>king of the breaſt and ſuch like. Such alſo is this ceremony of going to ſuch a place more than to an other.</p>
               <p>Hereof it proceedeth that one may eate fleſhe vpon a friday or otheer faſting day in diuerſe caſes:<note place="margin">Why one may eate fleſh on a friday, and not lawfully go to the Church.</note> and yet in no caſe go to the Church with hereticks. For to abſteine vpon certaine daies: is not a pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>per or immediate acte of religion, but commaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded by religion, being in deed an acte of tempe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rance, and ſo intended by the Church: though it may be referred not onely to chaſtice the body, but for to doe an honour vnto God. And becauſe this law is particulerly found amongſt Catholicks: hence it is that it doth oftentimes betoken a Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke and diſtinguiſh him from an hereticke. Yet becauſe the immediate end of the law is tem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perance, and the acte of eating fleſh or other for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bidden meates is ſuch as hath other naturall endes
<pb n="74" facs="tcp:283:44"/>beſides the profeſſion of religion as of feeding the body, or eating with diſpenſation; therfore is there not neceſſarily implied therin any ceremony or ſignification of religion: And in caſe of neceſſity it may be vſed, although others vnderſtand a pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſion of hereſy therin. For why, this act of eating or abſteining, neither of the owne nature nor by common eſtimation of men doth ſignifie religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, but hath an other principall vſe. Yet the go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church howſoeuer, doth alwaies be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>token, both of the owne nature and by common ac ception of all the worlde, deuotion and religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, in Catholicke Churches to the true faith: in hereticall to their deteſtable ſinagogues.</p>
               <p>This doth S. THOMAS (whom I oftener al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leage becauſe my conflict is with thoſe which will be counted Catholickes,<note place="margin">2.2. q. 84. ar. 3. ad 2.</note> although in this apoſtati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>call action, they doe deny their Catholicke religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.) This I ſay doth S. THOMAS very plainely ſett downe, whan he yeeldeth three cauſes why exteriour worſhip of God ſhould haue a determi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nate place, where principally it ought to be exhi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bited, not that God may be included in any place, but for reſpect of thoſe which doe worſhipp him. The firſt is,<note place="margin">Three cau<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſes of Church<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ches. 3. Reg. 8.</note> for the conſecration of the place, wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>by thoſe which praye conceiue ſpirituall deuotion, that they may the rather be heard, as it is manifeſt in the worſhipping of SALOMON. Secondly, for the Sacred miſteries, and other ſignes of holi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes which are there conteined. Thirdly, for the concourſe of many worſhippers, wherby the praier is made more acceptable:<note place="margin">Mat. 18.</note> according to that: where there are two or three gathered togither in my
<pb n="75" facs="tcp:283:44"/>name there am I in the middeſt of them. Conſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>der I pray you then, whether this place haue not a ſignification of agreement in religion, and of a ce<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>remony of that religion, which is there gathered togither, I may not ſay in the name of Chriſt, but leaue vnto your ſelfe to iudge in whoſe name. As for the conſecration, you know from whence it came, and how neuertheleſſe they which were the autours therof account it now prophaned. But of the ſacred miſteries and other ſignes of holines, I hope you wil not be very ready to bragge or boaſt: eſpecially when I ſhall tell you hereafter what ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner of miſteries there be in Proteſtants ſeruice.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="6"/> Yet moreouer doe I proue this preſence to be ce<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>remonious.<note place="margin">The mini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſters pre<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ſence is cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>monious.</note> The miniſter himſelfe is ceremoniouſly preſent, yea although whileſt he readeth his ſeruice he would neuer ſo faine intend to be away or wiſh that as it hapneth ſometime to ſome of his brethre<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, he were reading Chaucer. But the preſence of the miniſter and of the auditours haue a neceſſary re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lation togither: The miniſter is there as one that offereth for the reſt, the others as thoſe which are offered for.<note place="margin">Heb. 3.</note> Euery Biſhopp ſaith S. PAVL being aſſumpted out of men, is appointed for men, in thoſe thinges which appertaine vnto God. The miniſter is to enter into the Tabernacle: the peo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple to expect without.<note place="margin">Luc. 1.</note> The miniſter is to make perfect: the people to receiue perfection. And ther<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>fore a ſufficient ſigne of religion is it in the laity to be preſent. Than may we manifeſtly inferr that y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> lay people is alſo ceremoniouſly preſent. Whence I inferre: that as the miniſter if in the ſaying of his co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munion he were touched of god, ſo that he were
<pb n="76" facs="tcp:283:45"/>reſolued to renounce his hereſy: were bound vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>der mortai ſinne preſently to lay downe his booke.<note place="margin">It is impoſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſible to re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceaue Gods grace in the Church of heretickes.</note> and not to continew his vnlawfull action, no not for one inſtant. So alſo the lay man going thither for feare, and in offering vp ſuch praiers as he can afford almighty God in that place, being touched with remorce of conſcience of his vnlawfull pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſence: is bound vnder paine of the ſame ſinne to followe immediately the counſell of the Prophett, and of the Apoſtle:<note place="margin">Eſa. 52. 2. Cor. 6.</note> Gett ye hence, gett ye hence, go forth from hence, touch not that which is pol<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>luted, go forth of the middeſt of your congrega<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion. Neither were it ſufficient for ſuch to deter<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mine that he would go no more: for ſo long as he ſtaied there ſo long ſhould he continew in the acte of a mortall ſinne.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="7"/> 
                  <note place="margin">The here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tence is cere monious</note> Againe the hereticke him ſelfe euery time that he goeth doth an acte of religion and of his falſe religion, profeſſing his vnity in the church of Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uin: therfore ſo doth the Catholicke alſo, &amp; both alike in euery particuler time committ a new of<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fence. For although the one with this exteriour act of religion, hath ioined the interiour: yet ſuffici<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ent it is that both doe the ſame exteriour act. And the heretickes ſinne is dubble: for he is an inward an outward hereticke. But the other is onely an exteriour hereticke, but not an interiour.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="8"/> Than that it is not lawfull to receiue the here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes communion, all agree. But the very ſame caſe is of the preſence at ſeruice,<note place="margin">Receauing the co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion is cere monious.</note> although one be more greeuouſe, than the other: therfore it is not lawfull to be preſent. For let vs ſcanne a litle the nature of receiuing the communion. For I pray
<pb n="77" facs="tcp:283:45"/>you, why may you not receiue? Becauſe this is not an indiſterent thing, as my preſence is. what thing more indifferent, than to eate a peace of bread? becauſe it is geuen me in ſteed of a farre more ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>celent thing which Chriſt inſtituted. So is the ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice roung in your eares in ſteed of a farre more ſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cred thing And as you ſett litle by the ſeruice, ſo you may alſo ſett as litle by the bread: eſpecially wheras ſome of your miniſters will ſcant take it vp from the ground if it fall. Becauſe I ſhould receiue it vnworthely &amp; to my damnatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. What? do you now know that Chriſt is not there, &amp; that true con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſecration is not made? Doe you receiue euery but of meate w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> you receiue vnworthely, to your dam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nation? becauſe it goeth againſt my conſcience. O ſcrupulous conſcience, and why goeth it againſt your conſcience; or why this, more than that? Bring forth any cauſe why you may not receaue, and I will bring the ſame for to diſallow your pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſence. The trew cauſe therfor is, for that to receaue is an acte of their religion, and ſo is alſo to be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent at ſeruice. Obedience may excuſe as well the one as the other: An intention of I knowe not what, may cleare them both alike. And if to go to the Church be not euill in it ſelfe, neither is re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceauing. Yea greater indifferency is in eating and drincking which hath other materiall reaſons of commendable and diſcommendable: than can be in the going to the Church, and to ſuch a compa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny which hath no other naturall end at that time, and with thoſe conditions, but religion.<milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="9"/> 
                  <note place="margin">The mini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſters ſayng is not cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>moniouſe. but in re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſpect of the company</note>
               </p>
               <p>Againe the miniſters ſaying is an exteriour acte of religion and a ceremoniouſe behauiour. But
<pb n="78" facs="tcp:283:46"/>his ſaying is not ceremoniouſe but in reſpect of the company, which is there religiouſly preſent for to heare him. For if one w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> hath licence to read here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticall bookes, did out of the Church, at a table for curioſity, before great companies, read the verve ſame it were no religiouſe or ceremoniouſe acte. Therfore as well the hearer as the reader are religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſly preſent.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="10"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Preſence at Idolatry is ceremoni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe. 1. Cor. 10 ſee Teſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of Rhemes.</note> Beſides. To be preſent at Idolatry after the like maner or to eate idolothites otherwiſe the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> at a pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>phane ſeaſt &amp; not in the temple, is a profeſſion of the Idolls ſeruice: therfore is the like in this your preſence in reſpect of hereſy: the one ſignifying as well as the other. heither haue wee in Chriſtian times any other Idolls but hereſies, nor idolothites, but their falſe ſeruices ſhifted into our Churches in ſteed of Gods trew and onely worſhippe.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="11"/> Furthermore to vſe the veſtiments of a Turke, in which for the honour of Mahomet there is his picture,<note place="margin">The veſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments of a Turke ſee §. 35.</note> or the picture of the mone, ſpecially dedi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cated vnto him: is by all Diuines eſteemed of it ſelfe a mortall ſinne: For no other reaſon than be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe ſuch a veſtiment is ordained for no other end but to ſignify religion:<note place="margin">Caiet. verbo Habitus omiſſio Bannes. 2.2. q. 3. ar. 2 dub. 2.</note> Euch as the offring of in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cenſe vnto an Idoll donne in ſuch time and place is determined vnto a naughty end of Idolatry,—al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though the intention be ſarre contrary: But the vnion in praier with a falſe ſecte being a ceremony of religion, is more neere vnto ſuch a ſignification, than a coate which is prophanely vſed, and only a marke of religion: Much more than muſt it be vnlawfull, although the intention be neuer ſo con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trary.
<pb n="79" facs="tcp:283:46"/>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="12"/> Alſo in the great and famous controuerſie, which was betweene the two great lightes of the Church S. AVGVSTINE &amp; S. HIEROME,<note place="margin">Diſſem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bling of any lewes cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mony, is ce<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>remonious. ep. 11. &amp; 19 Aug.</note> they both agree in this that the Iudaicall obſernances are per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niciouſe and deadly. As thou (ſaieth Saint AV<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>GVSTINE) with a free voice, yea although all the worlde were againſt thee, doeſt pronounce, that the ceremonies of the Iewes are both pernici<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe and deadly vnto Chriſtians, and whoſoeuer ſhall obſerue them, whether he be of the Iewes or Gentiles, that he is tombled downe into the pitt of the Diuell: So doe I alſo confirme this thy ſaying,<note place="margin">S. AUguſtin and S. Hie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>romes cen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſure.</note> and adde that whoſoeuer ſhall obſerue, them whe<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ther of the Iewes or of the Gentills, not onely nue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly, but alſo diſſemblingly, he is hurled downe in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to the pitt of the Diuell. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> This doctrine is ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cording to thoſe wordes of S. PAVL:<note place="margin">Gal. 5</note> If you be circumciſed, Chuſt will profit you nothing: what is the reaſon of this? but becauſe theſe ceremonies are ſignes of Iudaicall religion?<note place="margin">Ther Iewes ceremonies more law<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full</note> And is it not law<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full to vſe the ſignes of a religion which was once the onely trew religion in the world, and by Gods owne preſcript ordained, and may we vſe the ſignes of a Diabolicall ſchiſme and diuiſion, from the truth of Chriſt: which neuer was good, neither can euer be good? or what difference is there be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tweene the circumciſion, and ſhauing, and con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſing with Iewes, and the ſignes of your goodly new religion? For euen now may a man be cir<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cumciſed for his bodily health, and in like maner ſhauen. But the doing of theſe thinges after the ceremoniouſe maner of the Iewes is that which is reprehended, as a thing of it ſelfe euill. Euen ſo
<pb n="80" facs="tcp:283:47"/>doe I ſay vnto you, that although you may go to the Church, when none is there, and pray alſo with heretickes in a Catholicke Church or congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation, when a few heretickes come thither: Yet if you go to the Church of heretickes to their ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice, I ſay,<note place="margin">Wherein doe hereti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>call ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſiſt.</note> Chriſt will profitt you nothing. Here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticall ceremonies conſiſt in their ſeruice and ſacra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mentes. the ſacramentes you cannot receiue but by ſome particuler acte, but of the ſeruice you are partaker by your onely preſence. For that the very preſence may be ceremoniouſe,<note place="margin">S. Peters co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>uerſing w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> Iewes was to Iudaiſe.</note> it is manifeſt by S. PETERS conuerſation with the Iewes, to whom he adicined himſelfe that he might not be thought to conuerſe withGentills, which to haue bene a diſſimulation in religion, both S. HIEROME and S. AVGVSTINE agree: although the firſt excuſe him from ſinne, the ſecond condemneth, although not of a mortall ſinne. For than was it lawfull to vſe the Iewes ceremonies, that the Sina<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gogue for the reuerence of the Author &amp; antiqui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty thereof: being now dead after the promulgation of the new law of Chriſt, and of a Church w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> was to laſt for ener, might with honour be carried to the graue,<note place="margin">The lewes ceremonies were law<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full to the Chriſtened Iewes for a while, to knitt the Iewes and Gentils togi<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ther</note> yet ſo that they were not accounted as neceſſary vnto ſaluation. And ſo S. PETERS diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſimulation, although it were in a matter of religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on: yet beeing in a matter of a lawfull Religion for a time, it had no other ſinne than it had by diſſimulation, which is not mortall but whan it is in a mortall matter. Now if S. PETERS ciuill conuerſation with Iewes was religieuſe, becauſe it was to fulfill the Iewes law: how much more ſhall the ſpirituall aſſociation with heretickes be
<pb n="81" facs="tcp:283:47"/>ceremoniouſe? And can it than any way be iuſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fied? No no Sir, your reaſons are ſriuolous, and your diſſimulation is perniciouſe.<note place="margin">In Amos. 5. Hereticall Syna<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gogues doe ſtincke</note> Your Sinagogue is long ſince dead, yea already buried and rotten, and if it were not buried, yet deſerued not to be buried with that honour which was conuenient vnto the reuerend Sinagogue of the Iewes, who were Gods trew and naturall people. And therfore in nothing muſt you obſcrue her lawes: but per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſwade your ſelfe of them as S. HIEROME very truely faith. that ſo ofte as heretickes are gathered togither in the name of our Lord, God deteſteth their ſtench, and ſtoppeth his noſe.<note place="margin">In oſe. 6.</note> Yea the ſame Doctour in an other place, hath theſe wordes euen of heretickes which haue trew adminiſtration of ſacraments.<note place="margin">See S. Cypr. l. 1. ep. 6.</note> They offer ſacrilegiouſe bread &amp; giue almes, &amp; ſeeme to follow humility, which things if they be done truely I eſteeme as holocauſtes, but whan they haue loſte the knowledge of God:<note place="margin">Sacrilegious bread L. 3. dial. c. 31.</note> in vaine doe they bragge hauing cutt off the head of faith, to haue the other mebers. So did S Gregory call the Euchariſt co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſecrated by an Arrian Biſhop a communion of ſacrilegious conſecration:<note place="margin">Sacrilegious conſecratio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  </note> How than dare you haue any part in ſuch felloſhipp? or how can you ſo wreſt your vnderſtanding, that you can perſwade your ſelfe whileſt you are ioined vnto Beliall, to haue felloſhippe with Chriſt? <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="13"/> 
                  <note place="margin">The ſab<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>both. Gal. 4. Col. 2. Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>e. Laod c. 29. Greg. l. 11. ep 3. Can. Apoſt 69.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Finally to obſerue the Sabboth or other daies of the Iewes is to Iudaiſe. Therfore to be preſent at the ſacrifices and ceremonis of the Iewes is to Iu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>daiſe. For how can one vnderſtand that not to worke, or to omitte an action is to Iudaiſe, and to vſe an ordinary action of their religion is not to
<pb n="82" facs="tcp:283:48"/>Iudaiſe? than is there any doubt but in like manet to be preſent at Caluins ceremonies is to Calui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſe? Surely except you can inuent other reaſon, other rules and Iudgementes of morall actions, yea and withall other wittes, and other men, than hitherto haue bene in the world, you can neuer conuince the contrary.</p>
               <p>Than do I by ſo many reaſons conclude, that to be preſent at hereticall ſcruice is an exteriour religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe and ceremoniouſe acte, euen of that congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation to whome ſuch ceremony or religion doth appertaine.<note place="margin">What is a ceremony. See Bellarm l. 2. de Sacra in gen. c. 29</note> And therfore whereas the nature of a ceremony is to be an exteriour acte of religion, which hath no other end but onely the profeſſion of honour and reuerence towardes God. in that way which euery one doth follow: this acte for to be an exteriour acte of hereſie, a profeſſion of Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiniſme, a deniall of Catholicke religion &amp; ſaith, and a participation with thoſe of a contrary reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion and ſaith, and a plaine incorporation with the members of the ſame, vtterly excluding a man from the participation of the myſticall body of IESVS CHRIST. which becauſe it doth in di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſe maners I muſt here breifly as I am went) de clare the ſame.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="22" type="section">
               <head>§. 22.<note place="margin">Thoſe w<hi rend="sup">e</hi> go to here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticks ſeruice are many waies exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate.</note>
               </head>
               <p>Firſt therfore an exteriour heriticke is excommu<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>nicate in FORO EXTERIORI, in the exteri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our courte. For the holy Church generally excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municating all heretickes: they are perfectly ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>communicate: But if they ſhew that outwardly which is proper vnto an hereticke yet keeping inui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>olable their inward ſaith: they are not properly
<pb n="83" facs="tcp:283:48"/>called heretickes,<note place="margin">Exteriour heretickes excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate in fo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ro exteriori.</note> but onely exteriour or outward heretickes. And the Church becauſe ſhe cannot iudge of the inward affection of the mind, eſtee<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>meth them neuertheleſſe as abſolute heretickes. Neither muſt you doubt but if you were in Spaine the Inouiſition would ſo proceed againſt you for your going to the Church with heretickes, as it doth with thoſe which will not waſhe their diſhes or ſweepe their houſe on the Saturdaies: that is as if both you were an hereticke and the other. Iewes. Whoſoeuer therfore is an exteriour heretike, muſt fully perſwade himſelfe that the Church accoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth him an abſolute hereticke, and therfore that in places where he is knowne to haue behaued him ſelfe as an hereticke, he ought to behaue him ſelfe alſo as an excommunicate perſon, not com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municating with any other, either an ciuill or ſpiri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tuall thinges, wherby he remaineth although not ſo perfectly as others,<note place="margin">Nauar. c. 11. num. 27 Silu. verbo haereſis. 1 q. 9. &amp; verbo A poſtaſia §. 4. Bannes. 2.2. q 11. ar. 4 Cap. Nuper &amp; ca. Sicon cubina. De ſent. exc.</note> yet after ſome ſorte cutte off from the Church of Chriſt which is a viſible con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of thoſe which profeſſe the faith of Chriſt cannot include thoſe which in as much as is viſible vnto men haue cutte them ſeiues from the ſame.</p>
               <p>This is (I confeſſe) the common doclrine of diuines concerning exteriour hereſie: that is, that it doth not leaue the parties which fall into it ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>communicate before God and in conſcience, but onely in the out ward court.</p>
               <p>Yet you muſt vnderſtand that there are two ſortes of exteriour heretickes, the one which doth an acte of hereſy for feare or any other cauſe, yet not ſo that he may ſeeme any way to ioyne him<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſelfe vnto an other ſecte, or to participate with the
<pb n="84" facs="tcp:283:49"/>miniſter of ſuch ſecte, being by name excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate; or to fauour the ſame ſecte at all, the other ſorte is of thoſe which doe ſuch actes with one of thoſe condicions,<note place="margin">A fauourer of hereticks or partaker in their crime for w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> they are declared ex<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate are alſo ex<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate</note> or all of them, the firſt is not ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>communicate, becauſe he is nothing but an exteri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our hereticke: the ſecond is excommunicate being not onely an exteriour hereticke, but a fauourer or partaker in the crime denoneed. Yea moreouer he is properly a ſchiſmaticke, when he any way con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>curreth vnto the approuing, increaſing, crediting, or fauouring or ſhewing vnity with a company deuided from the trew Church of Chriſt, of w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> we will prefently more at large intreate. Let this now remaine that although ordinarily he which is onely an exteriour hereticke, is not in conſcience excommunicate, but onely holden by preſumption as ſuch, puniſhed by the Church as ſuch, and bound publickly, where he is knowne, to behaue him ſelfe as ſuch: Yet as the caſe ſtandeth in Eng<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>land, an exteriour hereticke is withall a fauourer of heretickes: for why he increaſeth their number and addeth ſomewhat vnto the creditt of theire congregation, and ſo maketh hereſy to ſpredde it ſelfe, and therfore ſo ofte as he goeth to them he is excommunicate He is alſo a partaker with the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in theire crime: for the which he is alſo excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate, if the cheife agent of the ſeruice be by name excommunicate for the ſame faulte, which your ſelfe may examine. But now let vs diſcuſſe, whether he be excommunicate alſo for Schiſme.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="23" type="section">
               <head>§. 23.</head>
               <p>My promiſe was (if you remember) to ſhewe that this action which I would ſo faine diſcreditt
<pb n="85" facs="tcp:283:49"/>and baniſh from the practiſe of all Chriſtian life is of it ſelfe euill, as directly repugning to fiue Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian vertues, from which we cannot ſwarue with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>out a mortall ſinne. Lett vs now, hauing already as I hope, ſufficiently proued that it is againſt faith the very foundation of all Chriſtian vertew; ſhew alſo, yet with more breuity that it is againſt the vertue of Chriſtian charity, the Queene and as it were the forme of all trew vertew.</p>
               <p>Charity therfore, as the Diuines all doe teach,<note place="margin">The effects of charity.</note> beſides her principall effecte which is loue of God and of our neighbour for God, hath diuerſe other effectes as well inward as outward. Inward: as firſt a ſpirituall ioy of the excellency of God and his goodnes communicated to his creatures.<note place="margin">Ro 5 et 14. verſ. 118. vet 16.</note> Se<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>condly Peace, which maketh an vnion of wills and conſent of deſires betweene. God and our ſelues: alſo towardes our neighbours and within our own ſoule, when all our powers doe tend to one end and purpoſe.<note place="margin">L. 9 ciu. c. 3.</note> Thirdly Mercy, which is (as S. Au<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>guſtine defineth) a compaſſion within our hart of others miſeries, by the which we are moued to yeeld them ſuccour if we could. Outward effectes of Charity, are beneficence, almes, and brotherly correction, which is alſo a kind of almes. Theſe being the effectes of Chriſtian charity,<note place="margin">Vices opo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſite vnto charity,</note> there are in like maner certaine vices oppoſite vnto euery one: To loue, hatred: to ſpirituall ioy, that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> we call ACEDIA, and may Engliſh a certaine loathing of ſpirituall good, &amp; alſo Enuie: to Peace; diſcord in thought: contention, in ſpeach: ſchiſme, warre, fighting, ſedition, and ſcandall in deedes.</p>
               <p>All theſe other deſormities being lett alone, we
<pb n="86" facs="tcp:283:50"/>muſt make ſome ſtay vpon that one of ſchiſme,<note place="margin">The gree<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uouſnes of ſchiſme. 2.2. q. 39 ar. 2. ad 3. ſee S. Aug l. 2 de bapt. c. 6.</note> which that you may euen from the begining the more abhorre: amongſt all ſinnes which may be co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mitted againſt our neighbour, in S. THOMAS his opinion &amp; alſo S. AVGVSTINE, is the grea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>test: becauſe it is againſt the ſpirituall good of a multitude.</p>
               <p>This moſt horrible crimne ſo dredfully puni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhed not onely in Dathan and Abiron the prin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cipall authours,<note place="margin">Num. 16.</note> but in all the wholle multitudes of thoſe which were partakers of the ſchiſme againſt MOISES:<note place="margin">4. Reg. 17.</note> and in the tenne Tribes rewarded w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the ſubuerſion of theire kingdome and generall captiuity into a ſtrange land, for theire reuolting from the houſe of DAVID: this crime ſo greate and ſo enormious, I ſay, that by your reuolting from Gods Church, that is, by vniting your ſelfe to the tabernacle of Rebells to Gods vnity: you do moſt ſhamefully and lamentably incurr. Which that I may the more plainely expound, I muſt firſt ſhew you (yet breifly and conciſely as vnto a deuine of the chamber though not of the ſchooles) what this monſtrouſe vice of ſchiſme doth meane.<note place="margin">The neceſſi<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ty of peace and vnity. 1. Cor. 14.</note>
               </p>
               <p>That Peace therfore of which we ſpoke before how neceſſary an acte it is, wee may well vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtand by that which Saint. PAVL doth teach vs, whan he ſaith that God is not a God of diſſention but of peace. And by our Sauiour him ſelfe, who commaunding his Diſciples,<note place="margin">Marc. 9.</note> to haue ſalte amongſt them, as without which nothing can be ſeaſoned, added thſe wordes. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Haue Peace amongſt your ſelues. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> who alſo gaue a ſpeciall benediction to the peaceable,<note place="margin">Mat. 5</note> and for his laſt farewell before
<pb n="87" facs="tcp:283:50"/>his death, &amp; his firſt ſalutation after his reſurrecti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on,<note place="margin">Io. 20.</note> thought nothing ſo neceſſary for his Church as Peace. Which Church although he had lefte amidſt the ſtormes and ſtreames of the world in which ſhe could haue no worldly peace: yet had he ſo eſtabliſhed in trew peace, that ſhe ſhoulde euen in the extremity of all kind of miſeries, enjoy not that peace which the wicked haue,<note place="margin">Eſay 48. Io. 14. Io. 17.</note> but that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſhould vnite her vnto him, and all her members amongſt themſelues: that they might be one thing euen as his Father and he were one. Now Sir doe you not tremble to thinke that you haue no par<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cell of this peace? For there is no peace with the wicked:<note place="margin">Eſay. 48.</note> and the auncient holy Biſhopps in the pri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matiue Church, called the admitting of the Peni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tents into the Church againe, the geuing vnto the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> peace. But whom doe you thinke theſe Penitents to haue beene? Adulterers, theeues, inceſtuouſe and ſacrilegiouſe perſons? not thoſe onely: For thoſe were neuer (as we will ſhew hereafter) in ſo farre a degree ſeparated as thoſe which did in the exteriour ſhew communicate with Idolaters, here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes, ſchiſmatickes: But thoſe eſpecially and with greater difficulty, which in a farre higher degree of apoſtaſy, hereſy, or ſchiſme, although onely in the exteriour ſhew, had deuided them ſelues from the Church of God. Why doe you not then long for this peace, and why doe you not thinke it ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nye thouſand yeeres, vntill you may heare that ſweet voice, which amongſt Catholickes is pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nounced in the holy Maſſe: PAXTECVM. Peace be vnto thee? For how can there be peace vnto you, which diſunite your ſelfe from that vnion
<pb n="88" facs="tcp:283:51"/>which peace maketh of one ſheepfould and one ſhepheard? or who is your ſhepheard I pray you? Sir Tinker, or Sir Cobler? for you muſt not deny but that he is the ſhephearde, of whoſoeuer he ſhaketh his filthy fodering vnto.</p>
               <p>Or if ſometimes before you be reſtored vnto peace with the trew Church of Chriſt, you pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſume to entrude your ſelfe vnto the holy miſteries: with what helliſh confuſion doe you heare that ſacred word of Catholicke Peace, which you haue forſaken? No, no. you haue broken that Peace, neither muſt you looke for any peace, vntill you haue renued that perfect vnion which Chriſt hath made in his Church.</p>
               <p>Neither yett muſt you thincke that Chriſt his Church hath any need of your perſon: alas it is but a ſmall acceſſe of gaine, The holy Church it ſelfe cannot be deuided: For it is moſt perfectly one: you may be deuided from it, and ſo are, &amp; therfore as an vnfruitfull branch (ſaue that you haue a litle time, God knoweth how ſhort, to re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>turne vnto the Vine) in preſent daunger of being threwen into the fier. This Peace therfore being ſo important, and conſiſting in the vnion of wills or deſires: Lett vs examine a little how many thinges there are in which the Church of Chriſt is to maintaine vnity, wherin her perfect Peace doth conſiſt.</p>
               <p>The vnity therfore of the Church conſiſteth in two thinges:<note place="margin">Wherein y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> vnity of the Church doth co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſiſt 10.21.</note> in the connexion or communication of the members of the Church one with an other, and in the order of all thoſe members vnto one head, that is Chriſt our Sauiour, and he to whom
<pb n="89" facs="tcp:283:51"/>he committed his ſheepe on earth.<note place="margin">Io. 21. Col. 2.</note> Both theſe partes of the Catholicke vnity doth S. PAVL de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſcribe, whan he ſaith of ſome that had ſo deuided them ſelues from Chriſt his Church: that they are in vaine puffed vpp by the ſenſe of their fleſh, not holding the head, whereof the wholle bodye by jointes and bandes being ſerued and compacted, groweth to the increaſe of God. This vnity haue you and doe continually cutte a ſunder: therfore are you not a peacemaker ſuch as God hath bleſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed (and ſo bleſſed are they which ſhall procure the vnity of the Church, that they ſhall be called the children of God:)<note place="margin">Mat. 5.</note> but a peace breaker a deuider at the leaſt of your ſelfe from ſuch vnion, a fugi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiue from the Tentes of your Captaine Chriſt: Fi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nally in one word which comprehendeth in it ſelfe many enormities a Schiſmaticke.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="24" type="section">
               <head>§. 24.</head>
               <p>That you cutte a ſunder this vnity and ſo incurr the deteſtable crime of ſchiſme I thus proue vnto you.</p>
               <p>The Connexion and vnion of the members of the Church one with an other is ſuch, that it muſt make them as one kingdome, one common wealth, one citty, one houſe, one congregation vnder one gouernour yea one bodye vnder one heade. For otherwiſe the Church could not be one, as we are taught in our Creed: and all other vnions which may be found in the Church (this which we ſpeake of being once taken away) can<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>not make the Church one, but may onely geue it a certaine relation vnto one thing, which relation diuerſe thinges neuer ſo contrary one to an other
<pb n="90" facs="tcp:283:52"/>may haue.<note place="margin">Diuers vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ties in the Church. Io. 6. Eph. 4. Ibid. 1. Cor. 12.</note> There are diuerſe vnities in the Church: it hath one begining, from one God which called it: one end and hope of the ſame vocation, which is euerlaſting felicity: the ſame meanes to attaine to ſuch an end, which is one ſaith, one baptiſme, and all Sacramentes the ſame: one Holy Ghoſt which gouerneth the Church, and diſtributeth to euery one his diuerſe graces. But none of theſe vnities make the Church one, but by them either ſhe may be ſaide to proceed from one or to be di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rected to one, or to go one and the ſame way, or to be ſubiect vnto one externall gouernour, not vnited vnto her as a neceſſary parte and intrinſecal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly ioined vnto her, which is the holy ghoſt. But that is the eſſentiall vnity of Chriſt his Church,<note place="margin">Rom. 12. The Eſſen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiall vnity of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church</note> which maketh it fully and moſt perfectly one: that it is one miſticall body whoſe head being vnited vnto the members, and the members amongſt them ſelues, &amp; with the ſame head, are now true<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly and perfectly, not from one, or to one, or by one, or vnder one: but one very ſelfe ſame thing. This is that vnſeamed coate of our Sauiour which cannot be deuided: from which whatſoeuer part is cutte, ceaſſeth to be a part of a garment: (for Chriſts garment hath no part:)<note place="margin">Cyp. 1. <gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="1 word">
                        <desc>〈◊〉</desc>
                     </gap> vnit ecc.</note> but as a bough once broken from the tree, withereth: As a riuer ſeuered from the fountaine, drieth vpp: As the beame deuided from the Sunne, in a moment va<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſheth away.</p>
               <p>Now Sir, can you any way perſwade your ſelfe to be in this vnity whan you go to your herticall congregations?<note place="margin">L. de fid. &amp; Simb. c. 10.</note> S. Auguſtine maketh a flatte op<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>poſition betweene the Catholicke Church and he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticall
<pb n="91" facs="tcp:283:52"/>congregations.<note place="margin">Catholickes Church &amp; hereticall congregati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons oppo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſite.</note> The heretickes and ſciſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes (ſaith he) call their Congregations, Churches. Where is Caluins Church, but in his congregati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on? Where is Luthers Church, but in his congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation? Where is the trew Church, but in the vi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſible congregation gathered in the vnion of the See of PETER? Who would doubt going into S. PETERS Church at Rome, and ſeing the mul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>titude there preſent at the Diuine ſeruices, to ſay, that this is the Catholicke Church? And who doubteth alſo whan he ſeeleth in London ſtreetes Caluins blacke ſanctus to fill his eares, to ſay this is the Church of the Caluiniſtes.<note place="margin">The de fini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of the true Church</note> Define me I pray you the trew Church. It is the congregation of many men profeſſing the faith of Chriſt, and v<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſing the ſame ceremonies and Sacramentes vnder the trew Paſtours.<note place="margin">The defini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uins church</note> Now define alſo the Church of Caluine. It is the congregation of many men profeſſing the ſame faith of Caluin, and vſing the ſame ceremonies, and ſeruices, and ſacramentes, vnder a Caluinian Paſtour. What exempteth you from this definition? your inward faith? your in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward deuotion towardes PETERS See? ſee how by going to Caluins Church you haue gotten Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uins imagination of the nature of the Church. Caluin dreameth out a Church inuiſible,<note place="margin">L. 4. inſt. c. 1. §. 7.</note> and ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nifeſt onely vnto the eies of God. Of this Church if you deſire to be, you may eaſely dreame it: but then are you not of the trew Church, but of a drea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>med Church. But as the trew Church of God is viſible it ſelfe: ſo is the vnion ther w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> viſible. And the diuiſion of other Churches which are in deed not trew Churches but conuenticles or as S. Hie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rome
<pb n="92" facs="tcp:283:53"/>calleth thee<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſinagogues of the Diuell, being in all the world manifeſt &amp; viſible, as it were the diuels viſible congregations:<note place="margin">Ep. 11. ad Gero<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t de monog. As the Church is viſible: ſo is the vnion therwith viſible.</note> who doubteth but the vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on ther w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is alſo viſible? You know that in Philoſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>phy ENS &amp; VNVM be certaine Tranſcendents, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> agree to all thinges equally: and looke what eue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry thing hath of Entity, that it hath alſo of vnity. Now if Caluins Church be a viſible Church (and I would to God it were altogither inuiſible, and ſent downe) ſo that the perſons therof were ſafe (vnto the Prince of darkenes, from whom it firſt proceeded) if Caluins Church, I ſay, bee viſible, than as the being of it is, ſo is the vnity alſo: that is it hath a viſible vnity, and what vnity is this, but that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> the wholle world iudgeth, a viſible freque<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ting of Caluins congregation? The Church you go vnto is Caluins congregation:<note place="margin">Eph. 6. Col. 1.</note> what is a con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregation, but a multitude gathered togither? and who maketh this multitude but Ihon, Thomas, and Peter, and all that are there? If you will from this word (All) challendge a certaine extra ordinary priuiledge, to ſay, that they are all except your ſelfe: you ſurely doe more than euer was heard of: and arrogate vnto your ſelfe,<note place="margin">Ro. 5.</note> the deſerued Priuiledge of CHRIST &amp; our B. LADY, who onely are ſaid to haue bene exempted, yet w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſufficient groundes of ſcriptures and Fathers, from generall ſentences, ſuch as is that of S. PAVL: <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> in which all haue ſinned. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> But Sir, you can no more exempt your ſelfe from this ſentence: All theſe are Caluiniſts, by ſaying except I: than you ſhall be able at the dreadfull daye of Gods ſeuere iudgement, if you alter not your courſe, to exempt your ſelfe from
<pb n="93" facs="tcp:283:53"/>(go you curſed) by ſaying, except I.<note place="margin">Mat. 23. What place our Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes haue in Cal<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>uins congre<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>gation Aug. in Bro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uin collat. 3 The ſoule of Caluins church.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Than are you one of Caluins congregation. Yet, that I may doe you no wrong, I will heere put you in minde of a certaine diſtinction which Catholick Doctours vſe: that is, that ſome be of the ſoule of the Church: and ſome of the body. For the Church of Chriſt is not a deade bodye, but a body quickned with a liuely ſpirite. The ſoule of the Church, are the inward vertues therof: the body is the outward ſhew. Euen ſo doe I ſay that in Caluins Church, there is a body and a ſoule: the ſoule is Caluins beliefe, and whatſoeuer other dowry of hell it hath: for this ſoule hath no other place than hell fier. The body of Caluins church,<note place="margin">The body therof</note> moſt fitt for ſuch a ſoule, is the outward profeſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on or ſhew, or vnion, or practiſe, and ſociety of Caluins broode. Now I confeſſe that one of theſe may be without the other: And as there may be in the Catholicke Church variety of her members: So may there alſo be in Caluins Sinagogues. In the Catholicke Church ſome are both of the body and ſoule of the ſame: ſuch as haue both Faith, and the outward profeſſion of Catholike religion: Others, onely of the ſoule: ſuch as haue not the outward vnion and peace w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the Church, but be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore God are of ſuch perfection that they be im<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mediately vnited therunto by his heauenly grace. Such are thoſe cathecumens, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> abound with loue of God, and trew faith: or alſo excommunicate perſons, not yet reſtored in humane Iudgement, but reſtored before God from whom they haue re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceiued trew contrition and purpoſe of amend<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment For God is not tied vnto his Sacraments,
<pb n="94" facs="tcp:283:54"/>but can, and doth oftentimes immediately iuſtify, thoſe which are throughly conuerted vnto him. Finally others there are which hauing no inward diſpoſition at all, yet either for feare or ſome other affection of worldly intereſt, in outward ſhew doe nothing differ from the reſt. And theſe are wor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thely compared vnto the heares of a mans body, or nailes, or euill humours, which although they be within the body, yet are they not animated by the ſoule, as other partes of the body are, being depriued of all ſenſe, and loſt without paine, and by nature not fitte to be quickned, bvt rather cer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine excrementes of the body, onely made to a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dorne and gard the body, and to be vſed by the ſame for the operations of the wholle. So than haue we found out your office in Caluins congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation. You are not of the ſoule therof, in deed: For I hope of the former faith, which I know to haue bene perfect in you. But as S. Hierome ſaith, although at the beginning no ſchiſme hath falſe doctrine,<note place="margin">in Tit. 3. Schiſme is the way to hereſy.</note> yet at the length it forgeth to it ſelfe ſome erroneous propoſition, that it may ſeeme to haue gonne from the Church with pretenſe of ſome cauſe: much like vnto your ſelfe, who firſt going to the Church for feare: now that you may purge your ſelfe of cowardiſe &amp; baſenes, maintaine your errour, contrary to the generall ſenſe, not onely of the Church, but euen of morall reaſon. Therfore looke well vnto your ſelfe, leaſt at the length, as the loſſe of charity<note n="*" place="margin">1 Tim. 1.</note> is the way to the loſſe of faith: ſo your entrance into ſchiſme, make you an entrance vnto hereſy and ſo to a generall ſhipwracke in faith according to the ſaying of the Pſalmiſt. Deſtroy
<pb n="95" facs="tcp:283:54"/>it,<note n="*" place="margin">Pſal. 136. See S. Greg. l. 25. mor. c. 5.</note> deſtroy it, euen vnto the very foundation. But yet (as I ſaied) you are not of the ſoule of Caluins religion. Neither are you of the body of Caluin, as a principall member. But you ſhall heare what you are, and I pray you heare it patiently:<note place="margin">Prou. 27.</note> For bet<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter are the ſtrokes of a frend then the kiſſes of an enemy. You are the excrements of Caluins congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation,<note place="margin">The excre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments of Caluins reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion.</note> receiuing life neither from Catholicke reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion, nor from Caluins hereſy (although how could Caluins hereſy, or any hereſie at all geue life vnto the ſoule?) and in that body you ſerue for no neceſſary vſe (in which you are the happier, and ſo I hope you will keepe your ſelfe, from any butcher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly and tyrannicall exerciſe:) but you ſerue them yet,<note place="margin">Caluins re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion in England hath bene compacted of excre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments.</note> for an ornament and creditt, as though they had a ſhew of a common wealth. And how fitlye is Caluins religion adorned with excrements? For if you take way theſe excrements, or at the leaſt, if ſuch excrements had bene taken away from the be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gining: in Caluins wholle body, there woulde be now neuer a ſound me<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ber. But remember (I pray you) that whileſt your body is with Caluin, your ſoule cannot be with the Catholicke Church.<note place="margin">None can be of the ſoule of the Catholicke Church w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> are of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> bo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dy of an<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>other. 1. Cor. 6.</note> For although the catholike Church haue vndoubtedly ſome w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> are of the ſoule therof, &amp; not of the body: yet thoſe are ſuch as being in ſoule in the Church, deſire alſo to be in body: and no waies make the members of Chriſt, the members of an harlotte. You whileſt you are with your body belonging to heretickes, cannot haue your ſoule in Gods hands, or his Churches. Therfore conſider your ſelfe wher it is with Caluin it is not (and God forbid it ſhold: keepe at the leaſt your ſoule from him if you can<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>not
<pb n="96" facs="tcp:283:55"/>your body:) with God it is not, nor with his Church: For they both of very good right require both ſoule and body, neither can either haue the ſoule without the body. It is in his hands (yet not as of a louer and fauourer) into whoſe handes, as a Iudge, it is moſt horrible to fall.<note place="margin">Heb. 10.</note> Who for his great mercy whold a while his iuſtice, and geue you ſpace of trew and perfect repentance.</p>
               <p>Thus much be for this time ſaid of ſchiſme:<note place="margin">See § 40.</note> for we ſhall afterward moſt euidently out of holy Fa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thers ſhew that your action is Schiſme.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="25" type="section">
               <head>§. 25.</head>
               <p>But your refuge will be here,<note place="margin">The 12 ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection, that he w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> goeth to the Church is not a ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matike, but rather an ex<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>teriour here ticke.</note> that by theſe rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſons I make you a Caluiniſt, that is an hereticke, and not onely a Schiſmaticke, which I intended to proue: and therfore aſſuring your ſelfe that you are no Caluiniſt, whoſe faith and pernicious opinions I with your ſelfe thinke you deteſt: you ſeeme to inferre, that as I conclude falſly, that you are a Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiniſt: So doe I alſo falſly inferre that you are a Schiſmaticke.</p>
               <p>From this ſtarting hole can I eaſely expell you. I haue proued that you doe ſhew an exteriour vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on with Caluin: thence doe I inferre, that you are in the iudgement of the Church a very Caluiniſt: for the Church iudgeth not of inward affections, but of the outward actions: and deemeth thoſe actions to proceed from your inward faith, as they are of them ſelues an outward profeſſion of the ſame. And of this I ſpoke before where I ſhewed how your action was contrary vnto faith. But now I ſay you are a Caluiniſt alſo by reaſon of Schiſme: and as Caluin is both an hereticke and
<pb n="97" facs="tcp:283:55"/>a Schiſmaticke: So you,<note place="margin">Going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church is both exteri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our hereſy &amp; ſchiſme The diffe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rence be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tweene here<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ſy &amp; ſchiſm L. 20. con. Fauſt c. 3. &amp; con Craeſco Gram. ſaepe</note> out of his congregation come loaden with both vices, of exteriour hereſy and abſolute ſchiſme. Which that you may the better conceiue, you ſhall vnderſtand, that the dif<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ference betweene hereſy and Schiſme, is very well, ſette downe by S. Auguſtine, in that he ſaith, that Schiſme is, when one hauing the ſame, opinions, and vſing the ſame ceremony of worſhipping God with others; yet onely is delighted with a ſeuerall congregation: But Hereſy hath contrary opini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons vnto the Catholicke Church. Now therfore Caluin in that he teacheth diuerſly from Chriſt his trew Church, is an hereticke: in that he hath deui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded the Church of Chriſt, &amp; erected a new aultar, and appointed new ceremonies: he is a Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke.<note place="margin">2.2. q. 39. at 1. ad 3.</note> And therfore S. THOMAS with all the Diuines doe vere truely teach that euen as faith may be without charity, ſo may a man be a Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke and yet not an hereticke:<note place="margin">Euery here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke is a Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke</note> But as charity cannot be without faith: ſo can it not be that one be not a Schiſmaticke, which is an hereticke. Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uin than is an hereticke, and alſo a Schiſmaticke. Now in that he is an hereticke, your communica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion with him (if we may beleeue your ſelfe, ſaying you be no Caluiniſt in deed) is onely exteriour he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reſy, as I haue ſaid before: but in that he is a ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke, your co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication with him doth make you a Schiſmaticke: and not onely an exteriour Schiſmaticke (For in Schiſme there is no ſuch di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinction of interiour and exteriour ſchiſme:) but a very abſolute Schiſmatike. So that you are a Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiniſt, both for the exteriour profeſſion of Calui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſme, and alſo for the exteriour vnion which you
<pb n="98" facs="tcp:283:56"/>haue with Caluin: And ſo ſhould be called, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though Caluin were no more an hereticke, than other Schiſmatickes haue bene heretofore in the Church, whoſe followers haue bene called Noua<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tians, Luciferians, Donatiſtes, and ſuch like. And to ſhewe you plainely my minde: I cannot but maruaile greatly at their clemency,<note place="margin">The name of a Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke is too fauou<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rable in our countrey.</note> who gaue firſt vnto ſuch as you are, the name of Schiſmatickes: or rather I maruaile at your ſelfe and your compa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nions, in that you diſpute ſo ſeriouſly whether you be to be called Schiſmatickes: wheras you are ra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther in the iudgement of the Church, plaine here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes: being in the outward apparance (of which onely the viſible Church, as of a viſible token and badge can iudge) moſt abſolutely worthy of that name. We in deed who know you ſo particulerly and are fully perſuaded of your inward reſolution, which notwithſtanding wee onely ſuppoſe vpon your owne fidelity becauſe yon ſay ſo:<note place="margin">See more §. 40 out of S. Auguſt.</note> albeit your owne fidelity towardes God we ſee outwardly to be very ſmall: yet doe we very fitely, and truely call you Schiſmatickes. of which name I would you were ſo readely aſhamed for to mend it, as you are deſeruedly aſhamed for to heare it.<note place="margin">The 13. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection that this acte is only exteri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our ſchiſme and not ab<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſolute. &amp; perfecte Schime. There is no exteriour ſchiſme but is alſo in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward.</note>
               </p>
            </div>
            <div n="26" type="section">
               <head>§. 26</head>
               <p>But this muſt wee for your better ſatisfaction proue, that it is poſſible to be an exteriour heretike not being properly an hereticke: and yet not an ex<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>teriour Schiſmaticke, without being a very Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke.</p>
               <p>This Argument I can firſt anſwere by an other like caſe. For if you will haue in all vices the like diſtinction vnto infidelity &amp; hereſie, than may you
<pb n="99" facs="tcp:283:56"/>ſaye of a murderer that although he wittingly and willingly killeth: yet he may be but an exteriour murderer and not a perfect murderer: And in like maner of thefte, fornication, and all maner of ſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>criledge. The reaſon therfore of this difference is, that the vertew of faith, is in the vnderſtanding: for it is a kind of knowledge, which is alwaies in that power of the ſoule, which we call vnderſtan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding: but other vertues of charity, iuſtice, religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, and ſuch like, are harboured in the will. And hereof it proceedeth, that as one may doe an exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riour act, contrary vnto his vnderſtanding, but not contrary vnto his will: So may a man exteriourly worke againſt faith, and yet his vnderſtanding not conſent therwith as to vereſie it, although his will doe conſent vnto it as to doe it. for it is the will which hath the rule and gouernment ouer all out<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward actions, and they all are ready preſt to worke as the will commaundeth. So than in all morall actions (which muſt needes be voluntary) it is not poſſible that any be exerciſed outwardly, which as being voluntary, doe not ioine with the out<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward the inward goodnes or deformity. Euen as in our caſe propounded of exterior infidelity, ſuch outward action becauſe it is voluntary, hath an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nexed the inward deformity of the will, vnto w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> it is imputed, although not the errour of the vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>derſtanding from which it did not immediately proceed, and w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> which it did not agree, although it agreed with the will and proceeded from the ſame. All this we may plainly expreſſe in a familiar example. One may tell a lye, whan he ſpeaketh contrary to that which is in his mind, and by out<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward
<pb n="100" facs="tcp:283:57"/>diſſimulation ſhew that, which in deed is not. But yet although by ſuch exteriour demon<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtration he altereth not his vnderſtanding: yet doth his will voluntarily incurre the fault of lying and diſſembling. as in all other outward actions the will contracteth the deformity of them whan they be euill. In like maner may a man tell a lye or diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſemble in matters of faith, either by wordes or deedes, as hath bene ſaid: and than although he hath not loſt his faith, by loſſe wherof he ſhould be an hereticke in deed: yet doth he by ſuch lye or diſſimulation ſhew him ſelfe an hereticke, and therfore is called an exteriour hereticke. which ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teriour hereſie being alſo voluntary is a moſt gree<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uous ſinne. ſhewing that he loueth more the glo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry of men than of God. But in other actions w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> haue no reſpect of conformity vnto the vnderſtan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding which conſiſteth in truth, but onely a reſpect of conformity vnto reaſon and prudence, which conſiſteth in goodnes: there cannot be ſuch diſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>greeing betweene the inward and the outward, wheras the inward now conſiſting in the will one<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly, which reſpecteth as her proper obiect, goodnes and not truth, as the vnderſtanding doth: muſt of neceſſity participate that goodnes or badnes w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is in the outward. And therfore in our caſe, if ſchiſme be outwardly, it muſt alſo be inwardly. In few wordes wee may vtter this, for the more plaine vnderſtanding of the ſimpler ſorte, in this maner. Hereſy ſuppoſeth an errour in the vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtanding, and therfore he which is onely an exteri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our heretike without ſuch errour, is not an inward hereticke. But Schiſme requireth nothing but a
<pb n="101" facs="tcp:283:57"/>conſent of the will to diuiſion from the Church: and therfore euery outward Schiſmaticke, is alſo an inward Schiſmaticke: as euery outward mur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>derer is alſo an inward murderer.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="27" type="section">
               <head>§. 27</head>
               <p>Here alſo you take holde of that which we ſaied aboue,<note place="margin">The 14. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection. That if it were ſchiſme, all exteriour heretickes ſhould be excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate.</note> that exteriour heretickes are not holden by Diuines as excommunicate: and yet Schiſmatickes are excommunicate in the yeerely Bulle of Maun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dy Thurſday: how than can it be that you being onely an exteriour hereticke, ſhould be a Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke, vnleſſe all exteriour heretickes be alſo Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes. And than falſe is that generall propoſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of the Deuines, that an exteriour hereticke on<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly is not excommunicate: for he is excommuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate for ſchiſme, which we will haue him alſo to incurre.</p>
               <p>This is in very truth the greateſt colour you may haue to excuſe you from ſchiſme, yet, beſides that I will ſhew, that it is but a colour: what haue you gained, whan you haue wonne that you are not a Schiſmaticke? or not excommunicate for ſchiſme? is it not ſufficient to go to hell w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> fiue or ſixe mor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſinnes, except you go alſo for ſchiſme? or to be cutte from the Church by 3. excommunications, except you be alſo excommunicate for ſchiſme?</p>
               <p>But ſuppoſe that euery exteriour hereticke be not a Schiſmaticke: are you therfore aſſured to be of that kind of exteriour heretickes which are free from ſchiſme?<note place="margin">Although in all caſes exterior he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticks were not Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matikes: yet in this caſe they were.</note> Heare I pray you what I will ſaye vnto you, in this point: For ſo farre are you from the truth in this freeing your ſelfe from ſchiſme, becauſe you are an exteriour hereticke: that if it be
<pb n="102" facs="tcp:283:58"/>poſſible for any one kind of exteriour hereticke in the world to be alſo a ſchiſmaticke: you are be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>longing to that kind.</p>
               <p>For what want you, whan you be among Cal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiniſtes of the nature of ſchiſme? becauſe Caluin is an hereticke? he is alſo a Schiſmaticke as I haue ſhewed. Becauſe his ſeruice is rather hereticall the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſciſmaticall, for if it were in deed ſchiſmaticall, it ſhoulde not differ from Catholicke ſeruice? this were trew if Caluin were but in one of theſe de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>grees and not in both. For I pray you tell me: if Caluiniſtes were trew Catholickes in doctrine,<note place="margin">An vrgent reaſon to proue this ſchiſme</note> and had the ſame rites with the Catholicke Church, yet Caluin being deuided from the Church, and withdrawing him ſelfe from the vnity therof, were he not than a Schiſmaticke and his followers ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes, and you amongſt them alſo a ſchiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke? And hath he by being alſo an hereticke, got<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ten a priuiledge, either for him ſelfe or for you, that the filth of ſchiſme is taken away from a farre filthier diuiſion? No ſurely his diuiſion is not ta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ken away, but increaſed: not excuſed, but dub<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bly accuſed:<note place="margin">The 15. ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection that it is not ſchiſme be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe it is not accom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pained w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> an inward deſire of deuiſion</note> not diminiſhed, but exaggerated. Than doth there remaine but this onely defence, that although you ſhould be moſt properly a ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>maticke, if you went of your owne free will, or with an intention, or deſire of diſuniting your ſelfe from the obedience and vnity of the trew Church, and of the head therof: yet now going for feare, and being in hart and deſire vnited to the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke, you cannot incurre the diſunion from the ſame. Here (Sir) I haue catched you: for this w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> you thinke to be your defence, ſhall moſt eaſely
<pb n="103" facs="tcp:283:58"/>conuince you. If you went with thoſe conditions and intentions, than you confeſſe you were moſt properly a Schiſmaticke: as thoſe are which go in ſuch maner.<note place="margin">The exterior act maketh Schiſme.</note> But that exteriour acte is that which maketh ſchiſme, whatſoeuer your motiue or in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tention is: therfore are you moſt properly a Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke. For whan is more properly Schiſme in the Church, than whan two Popes are togither? And yet the intention of the Schiſmaticke Pope is not alwaies to decide the Church: but either to be a great Prince, or to reuenge him ſelfe of his e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nemies, or ſuch like: and thoſe which follow him doe oftentimes follow him for feare,<note place="margin">L. 2. vitae. c. 7</note> as in S. Ber<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nards time, againſt Innocentius the ſecond, diuerſe clergy men followed Peter Lyon, for feare leaſt the other, if they ſhould haue reconciled them ſelues, would haue vſed the ſeuerity of Eccleſiaſticall diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cipline vpon them. and yet were they by S. Ber<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nard and all the learned of that age eſteemed ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticks. The like may we ſay of the other ſchiſmes which haue beene in the Church heretofore: al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though of this we ſhall ſay more hereafter. Suffi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cient it is that Schiſme be incurred, that ſuch diui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſion be made, whether Schiſme it ſelfe be directly intended ot indirectly. Much like it is if a looſe li<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>centious young man, ſhould defile his neighbours bedde, knowing that he ſhall be diſcried, and his lemman be killed by her husband: this man is al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſo a man ſlear, although he intended principally the ſatisfying of his filthy deſire. Or if a theefe vp<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on the Alpes ſhould take away a poore trauailers apparell, wherby the other muſt needes dye for tolde. Or as it hath ſometimes hapned, if a theefe
<pb n="104" facs="tcp:283:59"/>by feare and threatning, ſhoulde make one trew man to hang an other or that we may bring Caie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tanes example of this very matter. If a man for to fulfill his owne pleaſure,<note place="margin">Verbo Schiſma.</note> ſhould by ſhooting in a publicke place, againſt his intention chaunce to kill a man. he he notw<hi rend="sup">t</hi>ſtanding incurreth the crime of murder. But of this point of your intention, or of the motiue of feare I haue ſufficiently ſpoken aboue,<note place="margin">§. 10.11.</note> where I anſwered your principall reaſons. This is moſt certaine: that as in all other ſinnes the exteriour action, which is the obiect of the in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teriour, geueth the quality therof to the interiour, whether ſuch exteriour acte or effect be principally or directly intended or no, ſo long as it is voluntary and foreſeene: Euen ſo is it in this exteriour acte of Schiſme, in which notwithſtanding I may ſay as I ſaid aboue, that whatſoeuer other extrinſecall or remote intention you may haue: as of feare, creditt and reputation in the world, (for this is it which driueth your ſelfe, and many other vnto the Diuell) yet the very intrinſecall end and nature of your action is Schiſme and diſunion from Chriſts Catholicke Church: So therfore although euery exteriour hereticke were not a Schiſmaticke: yet dee I ſay that you are a Schiſmaticke.</p>
               <p>Now to anſwere your obiection, and to ſaue the generall grounde of Deuines, that euery exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riour hereticke is not excommunicate: I ſay firſt, that if Caietanes opinion bee trew, who as you know is a Catholicke author,<note place="margin">2.2 q. 12. ar. 1. &amp; q. 94 ar. 1.</note> and of no ſmall ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>count amongſt the examiners of actes of mans conſcience: than euery exteriour heretike is proper<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly excommunicate, &amp; ſo euery exteriour hereticke
<pb n="105" facs="tcp:283:59"/>may perhapps be no Schiſmaticke, and yet be ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>communicate for hereſy:<note place="margin">Euery exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rior here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke is not exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>muni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate, &amp; yet he is a ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke Bulla caenae c. licet de Elect.</note> or if he be alſo a Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke: he may be as well excommunicate for his ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teriour hereſy, as for his ſchiſme, Secondly allow<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> contrary opinion, which is of moſt Diuines, that is, that an onely exteriour hereticke is not ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>communicate: I ſay, that the Churches intent in exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municating of Schiſmaticks, is onely to com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>prehend thoſe, which calling them ſelues Chriſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ans, either make, receaue, or acknowledge vnto the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſelues a new head as when there are two Popes togither: or thoſe, who making<note n="*" place="margin">Aug l. 1. co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t. Parm. in fine</note> a ſeuerall con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregation, or ioining them ſelues therunto, vnder what maner of gouerment ſoeuer, make a publike ſeparation from the trew Church or the head or members of the ſame. For it is not neceſſary as Diuines all agree, for to incurre ſchiſme,<note place="margin">Caietan. Bannes. The Pope may be a ſchiſmatick.</note> that the Schiſmaticke make vnto him ſelfe a new heade: for the Pope him ſelfe remaining head, may be a Schiſmaticke, if he ſhould refuſe to communicate with the reſt of the body in ſpirituall thinges: or defend ſecretly or openly ſchiſme: or excommuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate the wholle Church: or alter generally the Apo<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ſtolicall and ordinary ceremonies, rites, cuſtomes, and ſeruices of the Church. And yet in the Pope, this were peculier that he cannot fall into excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>munication, becauſe he is not ſubiect to the hu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mane lawes which impoſe excommunication.<note place="margin">Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes are exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>muni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate only in two caſes.</note> In theſe two caſes therfore Schiſmatickes ere excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate. whan they openlye profeſſe an other head, although they beleeue inwardly the vnity of the holy Church, and of the head therof (for other wiſe they were heretickes:) or when they erect or
<pb n="106" facs="tcp:283:60"/>make them ſelues parte of a new congregation, deuided from the vnity of the wholle. in other ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſes although they be Schiſmatickes: yet doe they not incurre ſuch cenſure. And if you aske me, what caſes theſe are in particuler: I anſwere: that if one amongſt Infidells, ſhould ſaye that Chriſt were not God, or deny for feare, not from his hart any pointe of Catholicke faith: or if in a Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke countrey one ſhould vpon any Paſſion, make ſhew of hereſie: becauſe here is no diuerſe head, nor ſeuerall congregation wherunto he may ſeeme to vnite himſelfe: this man is not excommunicate, although he be a Schiſmaticke. Contrary it is whe<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> he doth the ſame, for to ſeeme to vnite him ſelfe vnto a ſeditious head, or congregation profeſſing the name of Chriſt, or publickly ſeuereth himſelfe.</p>
               <p>Neither is this any ſtrange doctrine, that euery Schiſmaticke is not exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate. for who would doubt but that one who maketh him ſelfe a Turke or a Iew,<note place="margin">Bannes. 2.2. q. 11. ar. 4. Sylu. Nauar</note> or an Infidell is a Schiſmaticke? for how can he ſeparate him ſelfe more from Chriſt and his Church? yet certaine it is that ſo long as he in his minde forſaketh not Chriſt, or his faith, he is not excommunicate, although he ſinne moſt gree<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uouſly: or except he committe exteriour Idolatry, which hath a particular exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication, although not in reſpect of Schiſme, but in reſpect of Idola<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>try.<note place="margin">Direct. In<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quiſ. p. 2. q. 43.</note> Which excommunication alſo was not before the time of IHON 21 the Pope. To this alſo I adde, that according to moſt Diuines, no Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes at all were excommunicate before Bulla Cae<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nae. Wherin the intention of the Church doth co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>prehend onely ſuch actions as haue bene vſuall in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi>
                  <pb n="107" facs="tcp:283:60"/>Church, and ſcandalouſly are wont to breake the publicke peace therof. But ſuch pernicious ſchiſmes are onely in the caſes aforeſaide. Againe, an here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke neuer ſo ſecrett, if he priuately vnto him ſelfe vtter his hereſy: is excommunicate for hereſy. and yet I ſee not in the practiſe of the Church, but that ſuch as haue ſpeciall autority to abſolue from here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſye, would not ſticke to abſolue him, for all his Schiſme: which is alwaies annexed vnto hereſy.</p>
               <p>The reaſon her of is this.<note place="margin">why all Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticks are not excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate Aug. l. 1. de lib. arb. c. 5. D. Tho. 1.2 q. 96. ar. 2.</note> for that y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> holy Church being a certaine co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mon wealth, doth not alwaies puniſh alike equall ſinnes: but in ordaining of pe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nall lawes hath a regard vnto that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is perniciouſe for the wholle body: Blaſphemy is a greater ſinne than thefte: ſo alſo is adultery: &amp; yet we know the puniſhme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ts are not alike. So is it alſo in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church. ſome are exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate for a faulte in one degree, others for the ſame faulte, in an other degree, are not exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate. The cauſe why the Church ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municateth Schiſmatickes onely in theſe two ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſes, is for that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> theſe two onely the Church hath bene or may be ordinarily moleſted, and generally hindered from her neceſſary peace. Wherfore S. Auguſtine<note n="(a)" place="margin">l. 20. co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t Fauſt. in Tit. 3. vide Cypr. ep. ad Magnu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> 24. q. 1 c. Schiſma.</note> defineth ſchiſme by a ſeparation of congregation: &amp; S. Hierome, by epiſcopall diſſen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion. Wherunto Pelagius an auncient Pope doth alſo agree: who ſpeaking of ſchiſmatickes; ſaieth, that they haue made to the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues partes, and ſeue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ring them ſelues from that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is one, according to the holy Apoſtle S. IVDE, haue no ſpiritt.</p>
               <p>Thus therfore you ſee, how an exteriour here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke doth alwaies an acte of ſchiſme, ſeuering him ſelfe from the vnity of the Church: yet is he not ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate
<pb n="108" facs="tcp:283:61"/>ſo long as he followeth not, or ende<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uoureth not to make a parte contrary vnto y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Chur<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ches vnity.<note place="margin">Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticks in England are excom<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate</note> Than may a man be an exteriour here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke and yet not exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate although a Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticke, yet not ſuch a ſchiſmaticke as your ſelfe, who are a ſchiſmaticke in the higheſt degree, ſaue that you pretend to doe it for feare w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is not a ſuffi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cient excuſe to alleadge vnto Chriſt to purge the di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiding of his moſt indiuiſible holy garment. And ſo you ſee (if you will ſee any thing, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> pleaſeth you not) how co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>trary this action of going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church is vnto two Theologicall vertues Faith, &amp; Charity.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="28" type="section">
               <head>§. 28</head>
               <p>I haue ſtaied longer tha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> I thought to haue done in this matter of Schiſme. Let vs now go forward vnto other vertues, whoſe ſacred lawes, I ſay this practiſe of yours doth infringe.</p>
               <p>The next therfore is Religion, y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> moſt noble of all morall vertues,<note place="margin">Of the ver<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tew of reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion.</note> whoſe duety it is for to yeeld vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to God, honour &amp; reuerence. w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> it doth, both in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wardly by deuotion, &amp; praier: and outwardly alſo, by external ſhew of worſhip, by ſacrifices, offerings tithes, vowes, lawfull othes, and Sacraments. To theſe ſo many excelent vertues, are there many vices oppoſite. Idolatry, diuination of future humane euents, whether it be by diuels, ſtarres, dreames, fier water, birdes, beaſtes, or any ſuch like thing. Alſo palmeſtry,<note place="margin">Caluins ſer<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>uice is ſu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perſtitious. See §. 6. L. 2. de. nar. Deo. L. 4. c. 28.</note> wichcraft, necromancy, ſuperſtitious ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeruances, tentatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of God, ſacriledge, ſimony. All theſe kinds of irreligious behauiour you deteſting: I would you had ſuch conceit of Caluiniſts ſeruice as you ought, it being a moſt certaine verety, that it is moſt wicked and ſuperſtitious. There is be<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tweene Tully &amp; Lactantius ſome controuerſy con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cerning
<pb n="109" facs="tcp:283:61"/>ſuperſtition. The one calleth it the vnlaw<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full worſhip of the trew God, the other will haue it to be a worſhip of falſe Gods. But according to the doctrine of S. Auguſtine and S. Thomas,<note place="margin">L. 2. doct. c. 18. &amp; 20. 2.2. q. 92.</note> ſu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perſtition comprehendeth them both. Therfore as you cannot without mortall ſinne be preſent at the Gentills Idolatry, which is a ſuperſtition of the firſt kind: nor at the Iewes ſacrifices although di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rected vnto the trew God, and hauing bene ordai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned by his owne commaundement: So, &amp; much leſſe than at theſe ſecond, may you not be relgi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſly preſent at the ſuperſtition or voluntary<note n="*" place="margin">Col. 2. See Teſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of Rhemes.</note> wor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhippe of heretickes, inuented by their owne head, without the warrant of Chriſt in the Scriptures: or of the holy ghoſt in the Church: or of any lawfull autority of ſuch, whom Chriſt commandeth vs to obey: although ſuch ſeruice haue neuer ſo great a ſhew of wiſdome, or piety, as S. PAVL expreſly teacheth vs. But of this I will ſay no more: becauſe I haue touched it alſo aboue, only I wold not haue you to thinke ſo groſſely as many do, y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſuperſtition conſiſteth in the length of ſeruice, and therfore be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe Caluins ſeruice is not ſo long as ours, to free it from ſuch name: it is not the length of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> praier w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> maketh ſuperſtition, for than ſhould Chriſts moſt holy praiers, haue bene ſuperſtitious, who praied longer than any of vs all: but the forme &amp; maner of praier onely maketh it ſuperſtitious whan it is ei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther ſuperfluous, or pernicious as we ſaid aboue.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="29" type="section">
               <head>§. 29</head>
               <p>You tranſgreſſe alſo the vertew of obedience,<note place="margin">This acte is contrary to Chriſtian obedience</note> whileſt you doe an acte commaunded for conte<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>pt of the Churches autority. of which alſo I haue
<pb n="110" facs="tcp:283:62"/>ſufficiently intreated aboue, &amp; ſhewed, how ſuch conte<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>pt cannot be without a mortall ſinne. Neither can here your proteſtatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> take place,<note place="margin">See §. 9</note> as I ſhewed be<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>fore: as it cannot alſo, to exempt you from an exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riour acte of hereſy. For in the Primitiue Church Marcellinus the Pope &amp; others of like condition alſo, were accounted as Idolaters, although theire inward meaning were wel knowne to al the world to be quite contrary to their outward action.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="30" type="section">
               <head>§. 30</head>
               <p>There is an other vertew neceſſary in mans life which is called verity:<note place="margin">It is a moſt deteſtable diſſimulati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on. 4. Eth. c. 7.</note> by which a man ſheweth him ſelfe in his life, and ſpeach, ſuch as in deed, he is. Which may be tranſgreſſed either in ſpeach by a lye, or in facte by diſſimulation, which is a kind of lye, as we ſhewed aboue out of S. Ambroſe. <note n="*" place="margin">Ser. de Abra.</note> See You make therfore a greate lye by ſuch diſſimula<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion, and are by S. Auguſtine <note n="*" place="margin">See §. 6</note> condemned in Iehu, and by the example of holy Eleazarus in the ſcripture vtterly confounded.<note place="margin">2. Mach. 6</note> This kind of lying or diſſimulation in matters of Religion is moſt perniciouſe, and by all Deuines condemned of a mortall ſinne: being not onely a lye, but a lye in the moſt neceſſary profeſſion of faith, where all lyes are perniciouſe as I ſaid aboue: and therfore, heere I will not more largely intreate therof. But that you may more perfectly know the greeuouſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes thereof, and learne not to diſſemble in ſuch weighty matters, for neuer ſo great danger: I will onely ſett you downe a diuiſion which S. Augu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtine maketh of lyes:<note place="margin">Lib. de mend. c. 14 3. kind of lyes.</note> and his cenſure therof. The firſt and principall kind of lye (ſaieth he) and farre to be baniſhed from all men is, that, which is made in doctrine of religion, vnto which lye, by
<pb n="111" facs="tcp:283:62"/>no condicion any man may be induced. The ſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cond is made, that it may hurte ſome man iniuſt<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly, which is of ſuch maner that it neither profiteth any and yet hindereth ſome body. The third, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſo profiteth one, that it may hinder an other, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though not in any corporall vncleanenes. The fourth, which is made for a meere delight of ly<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing and deceiuing, which is a wonderfull kind of lye. The fifth, which is made for the deſire of pleaſing others with ſweete ſpeaches. The ſixth,<note place="margin">To ſaue an other mans goods. To ſaue an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>other mans life. To ſaue an<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>others pu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rity.</note> which neither hindereth any and profiteth ſome, as if a man knowing that an other mans money ſhall be taken vniuſtly from him, being demaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded by any, ſaith he knoweth not where it is. The ſeuenth, hindereth none but profiteth ſome, whan one lyeth vnwilling to betraye an other, who is ſought for to death. The eighte, hindereth no man, and withall profiteth heereunto, that it may ſaue an other from corporall vncleannes. S. Au<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>guſtine goeth farther and ſheweth his iudgement of theſe kinde of lyes:<note place="margin">c. vlt.</note> and calleth the firſt kinde (which moſt maketh for our purpoſe) a great wic<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>kednes, and the firſt kind of a deteſtable lye.<note place="margin">A lye can neuer be lawfull.</note> And ſpeaking of the laſt, that one may not lye for the cuſtody of an others chaſtity? he yeeldeth this rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon, that in the nature of good thinges, the chaſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty of the mind is preferred before the cleannes of the body: and in the nature of euill thinges, that which we doe our ſelues is more damnable vnto vs, than that which we permitt to be donne. And he hath there alſo a notable ſentence, that a man muſt not by the helpe of a lye, bee leade euen ſo much as to euerlaſting ſaluation. Yea he hath in
<pb n="112" facs="tcp:283:63"/>the 7. chapter that a virgin may not without ſinne tell a lye to preſerue her ſelfe from diſhoneſt vio<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lence. This ſaying of S. Auguſtine, I would not haue ſo vnderſtood, as though it were a greater ſinne to tell a lye not hurtfull vnto any, than to be diſhoneſt: but that ſuppoſing that any one goeth about to diſhoneſt a vertuous matrone, and ſhe haue no other way to deliuer her ſelfe from ſuch filthy violence, but by telling a lye: as that ſome body is preſent, which is not: ſhee ſhould rather permitt the diſhonour than tell a lye, ſaying with the glorious Virgin S. Agnes,<note place="margin">Amb. l. de virgin.</note> if violently thou de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>file me, my virginity ſhall haue a dubble reward Hence I pray you make the compariſon your ſelfe. If a moſt pure Virgin or moſt graue matrone, for to conſerue the moſt pretiouſe treaſure of woman<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>kind, may not tell a veniall lye: may you by loſing the greateſt treaſure w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> you haue or may be had in this world, that is your fidelity towardes God, and his Church, vtter a moſt deteſtable lye, which you doe by this wicked diſſimulation, onely to a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uoide ſome ſmall penalty of body or goodes?<note place="margin">Vttering of Catholickes ſecretts, to their danger a mortall ſinne and bindeth to reſtitution</note> Nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther yet for this diuiſion of S. Auguſtine, muſt euery ſimple bodye whan he is examined before Commiſſioners, traiterouſly vtter the ſecrettes of Catholickes: for to tell truth than, were a mortall ſinne, and to tell a lye vnſworne, were but a ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niall ſinne. Yet both may be auoided, either by ſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lence, or by lawfull equiuocation. and leſſe harme it is, if either muſt be committed, to committe the veniall. And if an othe be taken in ſuch caſe, it doth not bind. euen as no the of any vnlawfull thing, can bind in conſcience.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="31" type="section">
               <pb n="113" facs="tcp:283:63"/>
               <head>§. 31</head>
               <p>I will not omitt here to touch the crime of ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall,<note place="margin">That this action is alwaies ſcandalous</note> which is a vice oppoſite to charity: by which we geue our neighbour occaſion of ſpirituall ruine which although in this matter it be one of the leaſt reaſons to condemne your faulte: yet is it in ſome maner alwaies found in your action: in other ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner although not alwaies preſent, yet very hardly auoided. It can hardly be auoided, in that it cau<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeth others by your example to fall, and to thinke the ſinne either none at all, or not ſo greeuouſe: and withall it geueth occaſion vnto our aduerſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ries to inſult ouer vs, and to blaſpheme our religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on. And this is both the greater and the harder to be auoided; in men of knowne reſolution, and notable giftes or talents of wiſdome and learning: which they might better haue wanted, being cauſe of their vtter damnation, whan by the creditte of them they cauſe their Brothers fall. This deformi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty of ſcandall, I ſay, in theſe reſpects, can hardly be auoided. For you muſt not thinke that you can auoid ſcandall, by informing your neighbours that you come not for any liking of their religion:<note place="margin">A proteſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion increa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeth ſca<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>dall. See §. 19.</note> for whan you deſire them not to take any exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple from your action, this doth more increaſe your ſcandall, whileſt you ſhew that you doe ſuch acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on meerely againſt your conſcience, &amp; teach them by your example, if not, to go to the Church, whan perhapps they go already &amp; is but one fault: yet by geuing them a generall example in effect to all vice not to ſticke at any offence of God, either fornication, or theſte, or any other enormity, whan they ſee you, ſo perfectly acquainted with Gods
<pb n="114" facs="tcp:283:64"/>Sacraments, and the practiſe of the Church, to committ with hope of repentance, a faulte no leſſe enormious than theirs. Wherby, you, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſhould be the light of the world, geue occaſion to fill the world full of darkenes, out of the which you were once deliuered: teaching ſeruantes to deceiue their maiſters: children, to bee laſciuious: wiues to bee diſhoneſt: finally all maner of wickednes: ſo that there be no ſcandall, and that they intend after<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wardes to ariſe againe. Which although I know, you thinke to be faultes worthy of greate deteſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion, and they alſo for you are not perſwaded other wiſer yet by ſeeing you ſo couragiouſe, in aduen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>turing your beſt iointe, by leaping ouer the walles into the enemies campe: How can you blame them, if they alſo, within the walles, or without, being amongſt theire frendes, betake them ſelues to farre leſſe daungers? in which eſtimation of a leſſer daunger, if I ſeeme to erre: geue me leaue a while and I hope heerafter I ſhall ſatisfie you.</p>
               <p>Yet doe I confeſſe that this faulte of Scandall may in parte be auoided:<note place="margin">Going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church in a ſtra<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ge place is vnlawfull and ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dalous.</note> but neuer altogither. If one ſhould go to the Church with heretickes in a place where none knoweth him, not ſo much as the miniſter, or ſeruaunt, or neighbour: than, I ſay, ſcandall were auoided in parte. But ſuch go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing can ſeldome happen vnto a Catholicke, vnleſſe a man had ſuch pleaſure in going to the Church againſt his conſcience, as ſome men may haue (as we ſaide out of S.<note place="margin">§. 30.</note> Auguſtine) in telling of a lye. for either hee goeth to auoide ſuſpition in ſome place, and than, they which are curiouſe of him, doe conceiue of him as of an hereticke or ſchiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke:
<pb n="115" facs="tcp:283:64"/>Or he goeth that he may when he is called into queſtio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> or before that alſo (if he be ſo forward as many are) be thought, or ſaied, to goe to the Church. And this wanteth no more of Scandall, than the going where he is knowne.</p>
               <p>But howſoeuer it is, I ſay that ſcandall although it may in parte: yet can it neuer be fully auoided. For whoſoeuer is at an heretikes church,<note place="margin">Scandall can neuer be fully a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uoded.</note> although neuer ſo vnknowne ſo that he go not inuiſible, but be ſeene there, by thoſe which are there preſent:) beſides the ſignification of the religion which is there vſed, ſchiſme, diſſimulation and ſuch like as we haue ſaied before: he incurreth the greeuous crime of ſcandall, becauſe he ſeemeth to conſent vnto the wickednes of the miniſter, and his adhe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rents in that ſeruice. Wherin you muſt remember an ordinary diſtinction of Deuines. For there are 2. maner of conſents. the firſt is conſent,<note place="margin">Caiet verbo Reſtit.</note> which is cauſe of the action: as when I know that with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>out my conſent, ſuch action would not be donne. An other is a ſimple conſent, which onely conſen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth,<note place="margin">Two man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner of con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſents to an other mans ſinne.</note> and yet is not the cauſe of the action. As if in Parliament there be a Bill put vpp againſt Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholickes: and I know that ſo many voices being paſſed already before mine, my contrary voice can not hinder, but it will be made a law: Now if I conſent after ſo many voices, as are ſufficient, (for if I ſhould before ſufficient voices were graunted, the caſe were altered, although I knew what voi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces were to follow:) than is not my conſent a cauſe of that law: yet is my conſent, a conſent:<note place="margin">Ro. 1.</note> and ſo according to S PAVI. worthy of death as well, as that of the others. In like maner of you go to
<pb n="116" facs="tcp:283:65"/>the Church, and the miniſter ſaieth ſeruice onely for you: than is your conſent the cauſe of his ſinne and of the ſinne of as many, as are there preſent: and than, who doubteth but you committ a ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall? But if you go at ordinary times, when the miniſter notwithſtanding your preſence, would ſay ſeruice, and others be there without your in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ducement. or any euill example if this be poſſible:) yet is your conſent preſent, and ſo vnderſtood by all men, and therfore is not your action voide of ſandall, but by conſenting vnto an other mans ſinne, you are alſo guilty therof: as a coucurrunt, though not as the cauſe or mouer therunto: as one which alloweth, not as one which comman<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth: as one which geueth the voice; whan the number already is ſufficient to make the law. Nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther is there any doubt but you may as well geue conſent vnto an action vnto which you concurre for feare,<note place="margin">See §. 10.</note> as if you concurred for loue, as we haue ſaied before. Than vnto your ſelfe muſt you ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ply the verſes of the Pſalme.<note place="margin">Pſ. 49.</note> Whan thou ſaweſt a theefe, thou dideſt runne with him, &amp; with adul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>terers thou dideſt putt thy portion. Thou dideſt wickedly thinke that I were like vnto thee: I will reproue thee, and ſette thy ſelfe before thy owne face that is, that your own conſcience ſhall iudge and condemne you. But leaſt you ſhould thinke I ſpeake this of my owne iudgement, not leaning vnto the generall doctrine of Gods Church: you ſhall heare the Martyr Irenaeus his graue doctrine againſt the Valentinian heretickes and other like.<note place="margin">L. 4. c. 46. A plaine teſtimony of S. Ireneus</note> Be not you (ſaith he) partakers with them. And as there (in the ſchiſme of Dathan and Abyron the
<pb n="117" facs="tcp:283:65"/>damnation of the principall ſinners was common to the reſt, becauſe they liked them, and conuer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed with them: So here alſo a litle leauen corrup<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth the wholle heape.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="32" type="section">
               <head>§. 32.</head>
               <p>Hitherto you ſee I haue proceeded from the ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry neceſſary groundes of the law of God and of na<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture.<note place="margin">THE THIRD PARTE</note> Neither can you by your proteſtation, or in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tention, or pretenſe of feare, or any other motiue whatſoeuer, excuſe your ſelfe from the violating of any one of theſe vertues before rehearſed.</p>
               <p>There are ſome other reaſons of no ſmall force, vſed to be alleadged, of w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> becauſe I know you wil make no great account, I will be content to ſay no thing. One onely thing will I putt you in mind of: that is, of the daunger of infection,<note place="margin">Danger of infection.</note> w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> by going vn to heretickes churches, you expoſe your ſelfe vnto. of w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> if you make ſmall reckoning eſteeming your ſelfe a great doctour, &amp; able to anſwere all maner of heretical obiections: yet do I earneſtly deſire you to remember, that once you could ſay as much in this point of going to the Church, as in any other matter of Catholicke religion. And O ſenſeleſſe Galathian who hath bewitched you?<note place="margin">Gal. 3. Sap. 4.</note> how are you ſo ſuddenly altered? verely malice hath altered your vnderſta<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ding, &amp; fiction hath deceaued your ſoule and therfore moſt happy had you bene, if as y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> wiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dome of God doth ſpeake,<note place="margin">Diſſimula<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion is the way to in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fection.</note> you had bene the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> taken vp vnto god, wha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> liuing amongſt ſinners you were pleaſing &amp; beloued vnto God. O how trew it is y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> fiction and diſſimulation deceiueth the ſoules of many in our poore countrey? What olde man is now a Proteſtant, who hath not gotten ſuch peſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lence
<pb n="118" facs="tcp:283:66"/>by fiction? who is now a Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>miſſioner of ripe witte, who being ſonne of Catholike parents, hath not bene altered by fiction? Yea who is now ſo ear<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neſt perſecut our of Catholickes, as thoſe w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> at the beginning of this laſt reuolte, hauing bene Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lickes them ſelues, are now moſt oppoſite, becauſe they ſaw they could not haue creditte at the firſt, but by fiction?<note place="margin">L. 4. mor. c. 27.</note> S. Gregory deſcribeth fower degrees of ſinnes, both in the minde and in the deede, ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pounding a ſentence of IOB, and to euery mem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ber of that ſentence applying one degree. The wordes of IOB, are theſe:<note place="margin">Iob. 3.</note> Wherfore died I not in the wombe? or being come forth from thence, did I not forthwith periſh? why was I taken vpon the knees? why was I nouriſhed with the papes? Fower waies (ſaieth he) is ſinne committed in the hart,<note place="margin">Fower de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>grees of ſinne.</note> and ſo many alſo is it executed in the deedes. In hart it is committed, by ſuggeſtion, delection, conſent, and by the preſumptuouſnes of defence. Suggeſtion is made by the aduerſary: delectation, by the fleſh: conſent by the Spiritt: the preſumpti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of defence, by pride. For the ſinne w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſhoulde terrifie the mind, doth extoll it: and hauing thro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wen it downe, doth lifte it vp; but being lifted vp, doth more greeuouſly bruſe it. In the ſame ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner is a ſinne executed in the deed. Firſt, the ſinne is<note n="*" place="margin">Going to the Church ſecretly.</note> ſecretly donne: afterward, before the eies of men, without any ſhame therof, it is manifeſted: than is it brought in to cuſtome: at the laſt either with the ſeducements of falſe hope, or the obſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nacy of miſerable diſpaire it is nouriſhed. Thus S. Gregory. This is the miſerable progreſſion of la<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mentable Schiſmatickes, who truſting too much
<pb n="119" facs="tcp:283:66"/>to their owne cleannes, aduenture to touch pitch: and much like vnto the lewd perſons of the world, ſeeking to enioy their vnlawfull contentments, be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore they be aware, conceiue ſorrow,<note n="*" place="margin">Pſal. 7.</note> and bring forth iniquity: which ſo long they harbour in their vnhappy lappe, that at the length they nouriſh it with their pappes, and drinke it in vnto their very harte? Thus much for a wiſe man as you are will be ſufficient, for the daunger of infection,<note place="margin">Eccle. 3.</note> leaſt per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>happs louing daunger you periſhe therein. I my ſelfe haue bene acquainted with a learned religious Profeſſour of Diuinity, who according to the ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſity of his lectures hauing ſometimes Caluins workes in his chamber: with great humility (a farr contrary ſpirit, vnto that which beareth great ſway in our countrey) proteſted vnto me, that he trem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bled, whan hee remembred he had them in his chamber. Much more ſhould you tremble at the liuely voice of your blaſphemous ghoſpellers, as from whoſe mouth vndoubtedly the Prince of he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reſy him ſelfe, belcheth out the ſmoaky doctrine of his filthy kingdome. And it is a thing to quake and tremble at, that the Prince of the Apoſtles who thought him ſelfe (and that with great rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon) more ſtrong than your ſelfe, was notwithſtan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding at a girles voice ſo infected with feare, that he repented it all his life after.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="33" type="section">
               <head>§. 33</head>
               <p>Now for the greeuouſnes of this ſinne,<note place="margin">The compa<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>riſon of this ſinne with other gree<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uous offe<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ces</note> which as you ſee conteineth in it ſelfe ſo many ſinnes, I know not how to deale with you. For we haue receiued euen from the firſt Parents of mankind ſuch inclination to the defence of our owne iniqui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ties,
<pb n="120" facs="tcp:283:67"/>that euery one ſeeketh to make that faulte which he him ſelfe is ſubiect vnto, the leaſt of all other. much like vnto a tale (which is for all that no falſe tale) which I haue heard of a Robberye donne betweene London &amp; Portchmouth. when the theefe taking certaine golden buttons, which the true man had vpon his dublett, and by chance letting ſome of them fall: the true man ſette his foote vpon 3. or 4. of them, &amp; beeing asked by the theefe, who had diligently ſought to take them vp, whether there were all: he anuſwered that there were all. But the theefe remouing the others foote and ſpying the buttons tooke them vp, and ſharp<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly rebuked him for his lye; Saying: what a lyer? a lye is the worſt faulte in the world. So that I feare very much, leaſt as the theefe eſteemed his owne faulte leſſe then a veniall lye: So you will not be in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>duced to iudge aright of your faulte of going to the Church. But I tould you before S. Thomas his opinion of ſchiſme, who iudgeth it the greateſt ſinne which may be co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mitted of all others, which are not directly againſt God:<note place="margin">See §. 73. The hai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nouſnes of Schiſme.</note> ſuch as are hereſy, Idolatry, &amp; other like: but only againſt the neigh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bour. Yea in the ſame place he ſaith that ſometime Schiſme is greater than hereſy, becauſe it cauſeth greater harme. S. Auguſtine ſaith that it is a greater fault,<note place="margin">L. 2. de bapt c. 6.</note> &amp; ſacriledge: &amp; proueth it by the puniſhment of Dathan and Abyron. S. Cypri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>an is very vehement in the reprehenſion of ſchiſme ſaying that the Schiſmatickes of Chriſtes Church offend more hainouſly than Dathan and Abyron:<note place="margin">L. 1. ep. 6. ad Magnum.</note> becauſe theſe did not make a new congregation, but onely preſumed to take vpon them the office
<pb n="121" facs="tcp:283:67"/>of doing Sacrifice, which belonged onely vnto Aa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ron. But Schiſmatickes make a newe congregati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on oppoſite vnto Chriſt his Church. But you will ſurely beare reuerence vnto Chriſt his owne teſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mony, who appearing vnto S. PETER of Alex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>andria a glorious Conſeſſour and Martyr,<note place="margin">Peda in martyrol.</note> with a torne coate: gaue him this anſwere, demaunding the cauſe: that Arius had torne his veſtiment, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is the Church. Thinke therfore with your ſelfe of the filthe of this ſacriledge: and bluſhe to ſee your ſelfe a ſhamfull patch in Caluins coate, whoſe coat ſurely, is not now a peice of Chriſt his coate, which is altogither vndeuided, but a ragged cloute, raked out of the ſincke of hell, although preſumptuouſly arrogating to it ſelfe the name &amp; title of a Church of Chriſt. But we will ſtaye ſomewhat vppon the generall doctrine of S. Thomas, whom willingly I follow, for that his authority in common doctrine of Deuines is ſufficient to ſtoppe any mans mouth who pretendeth to beleeue Catholickly.<note place="margin">1.2. q. 73. Whence is y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> greeuouſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes of ſinns examined</note> This do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctour therefore, doth define that ſinne to be more greeuous, which hath an obiect of greater dignity. As becauſe all outward goodes, are of leſſe dignity than man him ſelfe; man being the end of all exte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riour things: and God more excelle<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t than man, as his finall &amp; principall end: Therefore is murder a more greuous ſinne, than theſe: &amp; infidelity, blaſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>phemye,<note place="margin">The order of thoſe good things which we muſt loue and purſew</note> hereſie, and ſuch like, are more hainouſe than murder. Than according to this rule muſt you conſider what good is taken away by euery vice. And that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> taketh away that good which is dew vnto God and his Church: you muſt preferre before all other. Afterward, there followeth the
<pb n="122" facs="tcp:283:68"/>good of your owne ſoule: than, of your neigh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bours ſoule: next, of your own body or life: than, of your neighbours: And finally your owne tem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>porall good hath the laſt place of all. So that you may ſee what account you muſt make of that acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, which neither obſerueth faith towardes God, nor vnity, and obedience to his Church: nor cha<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rity toward your ſelfe, or your neighbour. If a man ſinne againſt a man (as the holy ſcripture ſaieth) god may be pacified vnto him:<note place="margin">1. Reg. 2.</note> But if a man ſinne againſt our Lord:<note place="margin">Sinners in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church ea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſely riſe a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gaine.</note> who ſhall pray for him? Beſides if you ſinne within the Church of God, you haue a remedy at hand: the daily vſe of holy Sacrame<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ts doe as it were inuite you to repentance: the conti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nuall praiers and Sacrifices of the Church are offe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red vpp for you, to mitigate the wrath of God, againſt you. But if you once ſeuer your ſelfe from the body:<note place="margin">Ser. 11. de verbis Do. et ep. ad Bonif com. 50. S. Auguſtin ſaieth that ſchiſme is a ſinne a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt the holy ghoſt.</note> you can receiue no influence from the other members. S. Auguſtine where he expoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth the wordes of our Sauiour, concerning the difficulty of remiſſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, when a man ſinneth againſt the holy ghoſt: very learnedly diſcourſeth of the ſinne of ſchiſme, which hee affirmeth to bee the ſinne againſt the holy ghoſt. For that the Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticke vniting him ſelfe to other congregations, or rather as this Saint ſaieth) to other ſegregations, and ſo deuiding the ſpirite of God: cannot in any maner haue the ſame ſpirite of God, by which on<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly remiſſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of ſinnes is geuen: ſo that Martyrdome it ſelfe cannot auaile him.<note place="margin">Martyrdom profiteth not in Schiſme.</note> whereas thoſe w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> ſinne, being in the Church; doe onely ſinne againſt the ſonne of man, not deuiding the vnity of the ſpirit. And all this hee confirmeth by the authority of S.
<pb n="123" facs="tcp:283:68"/>IVDE, who ſaieth, that Schiſmatickes not hol<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding the head, haue no ſpirit or life within them.</p>
               <p>Neuertheleſſe that no man may take occaſion hereby to geue him ſelfe to licentiouſnes within the Church: let him vnderſtand,<note place="margin">Againſt li<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>centiouſnes in the Church of God.</note> that although hereſie and ſchiſme in them ſelues be more filthy, abominable, and offenſiue vnto God, than any carnall ſinne whatſoeuer: yet may ſchiſine perhaps ſometime be committed in ſo ſmall a degree, and with ſuch circumſtances of feare, or want of deli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>beration, or of perfect knowledge, or of the ſmal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes of the matter in which ſchiſme is ſhewed, that although it cannot be excuſed from mortall ſinne: yet it may ſo be diminiſhed that the greeuouſnes of other ſinnes, leſſe in their owne kind, but be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing committed with great diſorder and continu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ance, may farre exceed the greeuouſnes of ſchiſme. Moreouer carnall ſinnes are more dangerous,<note place="margin">Carnall ſinnes very dangerouſe. l. 3. eth c. 12.</note> than ſuch ſchiſme as may be of frailty and feare com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mitted. For as the Philoſopher teacheth, the ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>petite of delight is vnſatiable, whereupon it ordi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>narily happeneth, that a man is very hardly with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>drawen from fleſhly concupiſcence, if he be once entangled therwith: which is alſo the cauſe that the Deuill moſt of all (as S. Auguſtine ſaieth) re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ioiceth of Idolatry &amp; lechery.<note place="margin">in Leuit. Iſid. l. 2. c. 3.</note> But he which once goeth to the Church for feare, and with trembling of hart, and humble acknowledging of his faulte before God, may eaſely riſe againe. Furthermore he which is drowned in carnallity, for the veheme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t applying of his thoughtes and powers to ſuch ſen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fuall abiectes, is hardly capeable of reaſon, and of Gods holy motions and inſpirations, wherby he
<pb n="122" facs="tcp:283:69"/>
                  <gap reason="duplicate" extent="1 page">
                     <desc>〈1 page duplicate〉</desc>
                  </gap>
                  <pb n="123" facs="tcp:283:69"/>
                  <gap reason="duplicate" extent="1 page">
                     <desc>〈1 page duplicate〉</desc>
                  </gap>
                  <pb n="124" facs="tcp:283:70"/>may be moued to riſe againe: which hindering of reaſon and Gods motions, is not ordinarily found in one indeliberate or fearefull acte of ſchiſme. Fi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nally (as S.<note place="margin">L. 33 mor. c. 11.</note> Gregory ſaieth) carnall ſinnes haue a certaine filth and infamy ioined vnto them, which is not in other ſinnes, although greater in theire owne nature. Wherfore Ariſtotle him ſelfe affir<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>meth,<note place="margin">3. Eth. c. 10.</note> that the ſinnes of intemperance, as well in touching as taſting, are of all other moſt reproch<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full: becauſe they be about thoſe delightes, which are common vnto vs and beaſtes. Wherupon he concludeth thus: With ſuch thinges therfore to be pleaſed and delighted,<note place="margin">Againſt thoſe which call carnal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lity a mans fault</note> is beaſtly. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Thoſe therfore are beaſtly men, which geue them ſelues to ſuch delightes as they are capeable of, not in that they are men, but as they are (animalia) that is, liuing thinges, which is a name co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mon to them and beaſtes.<note place="margin">Schiſme a proper ſinne of the Diuel</note> Yet on the other ſide leaſt I ſhould flatter you to much: thoſe are Diueleſh men, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> geue them ſelues vnto ſinnes, more proper to Di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uells, than vnto men. which ſinnes although they be farre ſeuered from beaſtly concupiſcence: yett doe they imply ſuch deformity, as the Diuells one<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly loued at the beginning. as Pride, againſt God and his Church, hereſy, ſchiſme, &amp; ſuch like. For that you may know perfectly your owne eſtate: the firſt Sciſmaticke that euer was, was Lucifer: making a diuiſion in that holy Church, as yet be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing but militant, from whence he was by his de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teſtable ſchiſme throwen out: that as of him it is moſt worthely ſald;<note place="margin">Hier. 2.</note> From the begining thou haſt broken the yoake, thou haſt pulled a ſunder the bandes &amp; haſt ſaied, I will not ſerue: ſo he might,
<pb n="125" facs="tcp:283:70"/>being here permitted to gouerne the darkenes of this miſerable world, be King ouer all the ſonnes of Pride, who breaking the ſweete yoake of Chriſt,<note place="margin">Iob. 41.</note> and renting the holy bandes of his vndeuided gar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment, refuſe to ſerue vnto his holy Spouſe.<note place="margin">Eſay. 60. Gen. 7. Hieron. ep. 57 ad Da<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maſ. Degrees of theſe kindes of ſinne</note> For what nation or kingdome ſoeuer ſhall not ſerue this moſt glorious Queene, ſhall periſh. Whoſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>euer is out of the Arke of Noe, ſhall be ſwallowed vpp in the generall deluge. I will ſhew you ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore my opinio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of the degrees of this kind of fault. In the higheſt degree is hee which going to the Church, is an hereticke in deede. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> Than followeth he which is not an hereticke inwardly, but ſo go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>eth to the Church, that he ſeemeth to go with all his hart, and as an hereticke. Afterward, he which being commonly knowne to be in mind and reſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lution a Catholicke, yet goeth to the Church, and defendeth it as lawfull. and in this degree he may go the deeper, if others by his example &amp; doctrine be induced either to the ſame opinion; which is worſe: or to the ſame practiſe onely, without the inward allowing of his act;<note place="margin">Perſwaders of ſchime or allowers.</note> which is not altogither ſo hainouſe And if this ſcandali be notably ioi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned therunto: I dare match this perſon, yea, and preferre him, alſo, to the hereticke him ſelfe: and that by S. Thomas his autority:<note place="margin">2.2. q. 39. ar 2. Chryſoſt. ho. 11 in ep. ad Eph.</note> who ſaieth in this maner: It may happen that ſome Schiſmaticke may ſinne more hainouſly than ſome Infidell, or hereticke: either for his greater contempt, or for the greater daunger which he cauſeth, or for ſome ſuch like thing. Than lett there followe in this rancke, he who vſually goeth to the Church, yet all the world knoweth he doth it for feare onely,
<pb n="126" facs="tcp:283:71"/>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> and no way defendeth his owne ſinne. The nexte company of this band, ſhall be of thoſe, which vſe to go ſeldome, as once or twiſe a yeere: yet conti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>new in this purpoſe, and meane to ſleepe ſtill in their excommunication and ſeparation from the Church of God. For this continuance of ſinne, and of ſo greate a ſinne, and contempt of the cen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſure of the Church of how great accounte it is, the Councell of Trent declareth,<note place="margin">Seſſ. 25. c. 3. de refor.</note> whan it commaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth that againſt ſuch as after they are by name excommunicate, remaine in their excommunica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion for the ſpace of one wholle yeere, ſuch procee<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding be taken as is ordinary againſt heretickes or the ſuſpected of hereſy. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="6"/> Vnto all theſe in my iudg<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment, doe thoſe men which liue in the ſhamefull filth of dronkennes and carnalities (ſo that the cir<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſtances therof be not exorbitant) yeeld the vpper hand. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="7"/> And ſuch a one as once only, for feare, or ſome other paſſion yeldeth to go to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church, yet without any notable ſcandall. or peruerting of o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thers; and preſently ſheweth afterward vnto the wholle world his perfect repentance: This man I accounte of an inferiour degree of iniquitye vnto thoſe which continually liue in a filthy ſtate of car<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nall diſhoneſty: yet I preferre him in this band of wickednes before him which through frailty often falleth into the other ſinnes and preſently riſeth againe. One onely ſorte of men there is, who al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though they go not to the Church,<note place="margin">Prieſtes al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lowing of this action.</note> yet may incurr in very high degree the crime of ſchiſme and theſe are Prieſtes, (if there be any which maintaine this action) of whom I need to ſay nothing in this place Wheras for that learning which God hath beſto<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wed
<pb n="127" facs="tcp:283:71"/>vpon them, themſelues may conſider, what cenſures they haue incurred, or may incurre, and how great a fault it is oppoſing the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſelues to theire chiefe rulers herein, in ſteede of ſhepheardes to be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>come wolues. But if any one ſhould ſo forgett him ſelfe, and in corners ſecretly whiſper againſt y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> receiued truth: ſuch you are bound vnder paine of mortall ſinne, to detect, that by their ſuperiour they may be corrected. For it is conuenient that they know how there is one vnto whoſe deciſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in all doubts in vertew of obedience they are bound to ſtand. who hath long ſince not failed to make his iudgement knowen herin.</p>
               <p>Now Sir I remember that in heathen common welthes, it was accounted a great indecency,<note place="margin">Cicer. de offic.</note> for parents to bath themſelues togither with their chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dren: Such greate reuerence they thought to be dew to naturall comelines, that they eſteemed it no ſmall faulte, to be vnto them a patterne of the breach therof.<note place="margin">Impiety of ſchiſmatike Parents.</note> But how can you here anſwere the great impiety which you vſe vnto your children, whan not onely you ſhew them your euill exam<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple of doing wickedly, therby geuing them a cer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine licence to fall into whatſoeuer wickednes, they can craftely conceale: But you enforce them, or commaund them, or at the leaſt permitt them, to go to hereticks Sinagogues. Where is your wiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dome? where is your piety? where is your feare of God? I will here ſay no more than this: that ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cording to the law of God and of nature,<note place="margin">Eph. 5.</note> you are vnder paine of mortall ſinne bound to bring vpp your children in the diſcipline &amp; correction of our Lord, for who hath not care of his domeſticalls,
<pb n="128" facs="tcp:283:72"/>as S. PAVL ſaith,<note place="margin">1. Tim. 5.</note> hath denied his faith, &amp; is worſe then an Infidell. And what is this which you doe in your children, but to ſacrifice them vnto the Diuell? Let the example of Hely feare you: who though hee ſeuerely reprehended his children for their ſacrilegious extortion:<note place="margin">Pſal. 105. 1. Reg. 2.</note> yet becauſe he did not remedy their diſorder, was ſeuerely puniſhed, both with the loſſe of his life, and alſo with the deſola<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion of his wholle countrey and famely, and the taking of the Arke of Gad. And it is to be noted as S. Chryſoſtome very well ſaieth,<note place="margin">Cont. vitu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perat. vitae monaſt. Parents neuer ſo holy con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>demned for their chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dren. Carying to the Church by Nurſes</note> that this Hely was otherwiſe a vertuous and perfect man, as that Saint gathereth out of his reſignation which he ſhewed vnto Samuell, when the young Prophet after his new vocation, threatned vnto him from Gad that which afterward befell vnto him. But this one faulte did greeuouſly incenſe Gods wrath againſt him. Let this be ſufficient for your parici<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diall impiety towardes your children, that howſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>euer they be caried by their Nurſes to the Church, ſo long as they ſucke (which notwithſtanding is a greater danger, then to let the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> go to bedd without bleſſing, or to ſuffer the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> to remaine in place<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>s haun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted with ſpirits,<note place="margin">Going of children.</note> as experience hath taught vs) yet after they be once able to haue a conceit of deuoti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on towardes Almighty God, although they de ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ber ſo little, or ſo ſimple, to ſuffer the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> to go, much more to ſend them to ſuch conuenticles: is in you a hainous mortall ſinne, as being directly againſt the charity, and piety, and diſcipline towards your child.<note place="margin">Marying them out of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church.</note> The like I ſay of marying them, or permit<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ting them to marry out of the Church. It is the childes office in deed not to marry without his Pa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rents
<pb n="129" facs="tcp:283:72"/>or Tutours conſent, and in ſo doing albeit his marriage be ſufficient, though it be ſecrette, and without Prieſt, or witneſſe in our countrey where the Councell of Trents decree taketh not place: yet aſwell in the ſecreſy of the marriage and in the ſecret vſe therof, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is alwaies vnlawfull, although they be ſufficiently married, vntill it be publiſhed:<note place="margin">No ſmall faulte for children to marry without conſent of Parents or Tutours Catechiſm: conc. Trid. de Sacr. matri in fine 30. q. 5. c. Aliter &amp;c. Noſtrates &amp;c. qualis &amp; 23. q. 2. c. Non omnis Nau. c. 14. n. 15. Sotus. d. 29. q. 1. ar. 4: Bellarm. l. 1. de matr. c. 19</note> as in the want of his Superiours conſent, he ſinneth greeuouſly. This beeing in mans life reputed a great iniury, and againſt the honour dew vnto his Parents, except the Parents or Tutours offered him herin ſome great wrong. For although a child be not bound to marry whom his Father will, except there were other particuler circumſtances of the neceſſity of his family, or ſome great cauſe, which in charity might binde him, there being no cauſe to the contrary: yet one thing it is, not to marry at his fathers apointment (which notwithſtanding ſometimes may be mortall ſinne.) an other it is to marry one of his owne choiſe and appointmente, and to bring into his fathers family a new daugh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter in law, without asking his fathers conſent, or without preſuming of his liking: which thing is both contrary to the cuſtome of the holy Patri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>arches, and the honour dew vnto parents; and the doctrine of holy Fathers &amp; of moſt graue Deuines, and the cuſtome alſo of the holy Church, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> vſeth to haue the ſpouſe deliuered by her Parents or Tu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tours at the ſolemnization of marriage. Now you muſt not be like vnto thoſe which loue to buy good cheape, and to ſell deare. Therfore as you muſt haue your children obedient vnto you, ſo w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> mutuall bond, muſt you prouide for them, and
<pb n="130" facs="tcp:283:73"/>that much more in ſpirituall thinges than in cor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>porall,<note place="margin">Conc. Carth. 4. c. 13. Tert. l. 2. ad vxo. in fi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ne. Ambr. ep. 45. ad Si<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſin &amp; l. de Abraham. c. vlt. &amp; ha<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>betur 32. q. 2. c. Honora<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> tur very plainly intreateh herof.</note> and with more care and diligence preſerue them from ſchiſme and hereſy, than from the tem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>porall infamy of other wickednes. which if you do not, what do you elſe; but as<note n="*" place="margin">l. con. me<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>d. c. 7 Our dewty towards our neighbour in this point Eccli. 17. This dewty is much greater in extreme ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſity &amp; at the point of death. Ser. 16 de verbo Do. l. 1. ciu. c. 9. Ser de natiu Ioa. Bapt.</note> S. Auguſtine ſaith, beget children, that you may nouriſh them, not to God, but to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Deuell? I will not ſay that you are bound with your owne imminent perill, to admitt them ordinarily to Maſſe: but to keepe them from Churches, to inſtruct them Catholickly, &amp; when it is thought neceſſary, to prouide them ſpirituall helpes: this I affirme to be your neceſſary dewty.</p>
               <p>If you haue manifeſt hope and fitte opportuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty of reducing any moſte ſimple perſon from his wicked waies, whom you ſee to haue neceſſity of your brotherly correction and admonition: when there is none other which can or will vndertake the ſame: ſo that you fully perceiue that he will thankfully accept ſuch office of charity, and not traiterouſly detect you for a perſwader, neither ma<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>liciouſly or peruerſly bring you or others into ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nifeſt daunger of ſpirituall detriment: than are you bound vnder the guilte of mortall ſinne, by the very law of God him ſelfe, who hath geuen vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to euery one charge of his neighbour, to beſtow this charitable almes, and to ſhew this ſpirituall mercy like a good Samatitane towards your neigh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bour. which office if you culpably omitt, you are as S. Auguſtine ſaieith, guilty of the ſame crimes which your neighbour committeth. the reaſon of ſuch cenſure wee may vnderſtand by S. Bernard. Let none ſay, am I the keeper of my brother? Let none as much as lieth in him, beare patiently, that
<pb n="131" facs="tcp:283:73"/>order doe periſh, &amp; diſcipline be tranſgreſſed. For to be ſilent when thou maieſt reproue, is to con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent: and we know that like puniſhment is proui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded for thoſe which doe, and thoſe which conſent. Feed, ſaieth S. Ambroſe, him which dieth for hun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gar.<note place="margin">Diſt. 86. c. Paſce. vide. l. 3. off. c. 6.</note> for whoſoeuer thou arte, which by feeding him, mighteſt haue ſaued his life if thou haſt not fedd him, thou haſt killed him. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Inferre hence the greater neceſſity of ſauing a ſoule, than feeding the body: and the grrater bond of fatherly piety, than of brotherly charity. God graunt that in our afflicted countrey many thouſand ſoules, without any other crime but with this onely want of chari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty and piety towardes their neighbours, and chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dren, doe not euery day eternally periſh.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="35" type="section">
               <head>§. 35</head>
               <p>By this which hitherto hath bene ſaid,<note place="margin">THE FOVRTH PART Of the na<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture of a ſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue</note> it remai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neth proued, that this action of going to hereticks ſeruice, is of it ſelfe repugnant vnto the very law of God, and of nature, &amp; a caſe indiſpenſable by any power vpon earth: and, beſides, many other de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formities therin conteined, a diſtinctiue ſigne and manifeſt note, wherby heretickes or ſchiſmatickes are diſcerned from trew Catholickes.</p>
               <p>Wherupon I do infer two very certaine truthes.<note place="margin">The 16-ob<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>iection that temporall lawes or Princes, can not appoint diſtinctiue ſignes of re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion</note> firſt, that moſt friuolous is that reaſon of yours y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the going to the ſeruice of heretickes was lawfull before the ſtatute of going to the Church, and no diſtinctiue ſigne at all: and thence you conclude, that neither it can now be a diſtinctiue ſigne, wher as temporal Princes cannot giue the nature of a ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſary ſigne of Religion, vnto any exteriour actio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, which is not ſuch of it ſelfe. For howſoeuer your
<pb n="132" facs="tcp:283:74"/>aſſertion of the power of Princes in this pointe be trew or falſe:<note place="margin">This action is of it ſelfe a ſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue</note> this action is (as I haue ſaied) not by any worldly Prince or law inſtituted, but by na<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture it ſelfe, and by the very forme of all maner of Religions, ordained, as a ceremony. and from a ceremony if you take away the ſignification of re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion, of that religion I meane, vnto which it doth belong: you deſtroy the nature of a ceremony, and make a ceremony, no ceremony.</p>
               <p>But I perceiue the cauſe of your errour in this argument, to be the diſſention betweene Caietane and the reſt of the Deuines. Caietane ſaieth that if a Prince or a law amongſt Infidells,<note place="margin">in 2.2. q. 3. ar. 2. Whether a Prince may make a ſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue the omiſſion wherof may be a mortall ſinac</note> doe com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maund, that euery Chriſtian weare a certaine kind of garment, different from the reſt of that coun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trey, as a redd or yellow cappe: ſuch lawe or com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maundment may be in two reſpectes: either for the proteſtation of religion, that the Prince inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth onely to know theire religion therby: or elſe for a politicke diſtinction, that a Chriſtian may be knowen from an Infidell, for the peaceable order of the common welth, and by ſuch marke be re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>puted as it were infamous. Of theſe two caſes he geueth a different cenſure. For in the firſt, that is, when the Prince intendeth to know euery mans faith and religion, although the ſame Prince inten<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth therby to take occaſion of perſecuting the Chriſtians: he ſaieth, that it is a mortall ſinne to omitt ſuch garment for than (as he ſaieth) euery one is virtually, and in effect interrogated of his re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion, which than he is bound to confeſſe. In the ſecond, he ſaieth that a man may lawfully omitt ſuch a ſigne, eſpecially for to ſaue his life, wheras
<pb n="133" facs="tcp:283:74"/>ſuch law doth not bind in daunger of life, being onely a politicke and ciuill law, for the peaceable gouernment of the ſtate, not in reſpect of religion.<note place="margin">What Caie tane think<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>eth of the omiſſion of a ſigne of trew reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> appoin<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted by the Prince of a falſe religio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>.</note> Therfore he concludeth that if a Chriſtia<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> amongſt Infidells ſhould be commaunded to weare a redd cappe, onely for ciuill pollicy, leaſt any tumulte ſhould ariſe or diſorder in the common wealth, by diuerſities of religions, than in daunger of death, and with leſſe daunger alſo he may without mor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tall ſinne omitt that ſigne: As a Iew at Rome, or at Venice, for to auoide the officer which cometh to arreſt him, may without deadly ſinne caſt off his Iewes cappe, that he may not be knowen; yea although his religion were the onely trew religion of the world. For ſuch ſigne is not ordained for the proteſtation of his religion, but onely for ciuill pollicy. But if the end of ſuch law were onely to proteſt religion, and that the Prince intended ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>by to knowe Chriſtians, for to puniſh them for their religion, and not to make onely a ciuill di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinction, for the peaceable gouernment of Chriſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ans and Infidells: than to omitt ſuch ſigne is a mor<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tall ſinne, againſt the confeſſion of faith, which alwaies is neceſſary when a man is interrogated: euen as he is now (as it were, in effect) interroga<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted by the law or commaundment of the Prince. Thus doth Caietane diſcourſe of the omiſſion of the ſigne of a Chriſtian vſed amongſt Infidells.<note place="margin">Caietanes opinion of the vſe of a ſigne of a falſe religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.</note>
               </p>
               <p>But now let vs alſo ſee (for it maketh much for the vnderſtanding of the wholle matter, and there is great difference) what he ſaieth of the vſurping of the ſigne of an Infidell, either when Infidells liue in a Chriſtian common wealth, as Iewes at
<pb n="134" facs="tcp:283:75"/>Rome; or whan Chriſtians liue in an Infidell com<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>mon wealth, as among the Turkes. Than, ſaieth Caietane, although there be a ſigne appointed for an Infidell onely for ciuill reſpectes of temporall peace: yet is it a mortall ſinne, for a Chriſtian eue<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry time which he vſeth the ſame. So that a Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian at Rome wearing a Iewes cappe, or amongſt the Turkes a white Turbant, doth euery time com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mitte a mortall ſinne, although it were for to ſaue his life: for he than ſheweth him ſelfe a Iewe or Turke, by vſing the ſigne of either of them.</p>
               <p>Thus you ſee Caietanes opinion is,<note place="margin">Marke y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> dif<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ference of v<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſing a ſigne of falſe re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligion, and omitting a ſigne of true religion.</note> that a man may neuer vſe a ſigne of a falſe religion, although appointed by the Prince: but that he may omitte the ſigne of his owne religion, when it is not inſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tuted for a proteſtation of religion: but when it is ordained as a ſigne of religion, than cannot hee omitte it without mortall ſinne.</p>
               <p>This doctrine by all other Deuines for the moſt parte is thought to rigorous. And they teach very well,<note place="margin">Bannes. 2.2. q. 3. ar. 2.</note> that a ſigne of an Infidell, ordained for ciuill reſpectes onely, may lawfully be vſed by a Chriſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>an in time of neceſſity, and whan there is no ſcan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall. neither is there is ſuch vſe, any ſignification of religion iuſtly geuen,<note place="margin">Other Di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uines are a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt Caie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tane.</note> but onely permitted. Euen as a lay man may weare a religious mans ordinary apparell, or a man a womans gowne for a good end, or for neceſſity, and yet not make any lye at all in the outward ſhew: but vſing that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> hath an other end beſides the ſignification; permitt the behoulders to thinke him, to be either a freer or a woman, which in deed he is not. As alſo Chriſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>an Captaines in warre often times for policy vſe
<pb n="135" facs="tcp:283:75"/>Turkes banners: and Prieſtes among heretickes, lay apparell: and neuer are reprehended by any deuoute conſcience, for lying or diſſembling, ei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther in religion, or in their particuler eſtate.</p>
               <p>In like maner the ſame Deuines doe teach againſt Caietane, that a man may lawfully omitte a ſigne of a Chriſtian where it is appointed, whan by any neceſſity he is vrged therunto. and they yeld a rea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon, for that ſuch Princes cannot preſcribe vnto vs by what ſignes we ſhall proteſt our faith.</p>
               <p>Here Sir, was that with which you were decei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued. For although Caietane be worthely iudged, to haue bene too ſeueere: yet againſt this action of going to hereticall ſcruice, togither with Caie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tane, doe all other Deuines geue theire graue and moſt deſerued verditte.<note place="margin">Diuerſe kindes of ſignes or to<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>kens of reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion.</note>
               </p>
               <p>For they diſtinguiſh in theſe matters, whether they be garmentes, or other actions; diuerſe kinds. The firſt is, when ſome ſpeciall garmentes or acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons, are proper onely to a certaine nation, which is hereticall, Iewiſh, or Turkiſh; <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> not in that they be of ſuch religion,<note place="margin">Aſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue of religion in reſpect of the nation</note> but in that the common vſe of their countrey, hath brought into practiſe, ſuch particuler cuſtome. Such are the diuerſe banners of ſeuerall countreis, and the manifolde faſhions of apparell, which in euery countrey we ſee to be moſt in vſe. and in this kind there is no difficulty but any man may vſe ſuch garments or ſignes, <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> as well as the proper tongue of the countrey,<note place="margin">Aſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue in reſpect of ci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uill Pollicy</note> for any lawfull aduantage.</p>
               <p>The ſecond degree is when not onely in reſpect of the countrey, but particulerly, for to make a di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinction of religion, ſuch garment is preſcribed or
<pb n="136" facs="tcp:283:76"/>vſed: And if ſuch preſcription or cuſtome be one<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly brought in for humane policy of ciuill gouern<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment, although withall there were a purpoſe of puniſhing or afflicting Chriſtians therby: yett if there be ſome ciuill or honeſt humane vſe of the ſame beſides the ſignification of hereſie, Iudaiſme, Turkiſme, or other ſorte of Infidelity and Apoſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſy: In vrgent caſe of neceſſity it may alſo be vſed lawfully by a Chriſtian, as we haue ſaide before. and it ſeemeth very reaſonable, for that a Turke newly conuerted to Chriſt, were not in any mans iudgement bound vnder mortall ſinne, preſently to caſt away his white Turbant and ſo to betraye him ſelfe: for in thoſe countreis a ſigne of a Turke is a white Turbant on his head.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> The third degree, is whan ſuch garment or acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, is beſides the ciuill vſe thereof,<note place="margin">A ſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue in repect of religion, yet hauing a prophane vſe for the principall end</note> (which is the principall end) referred vnto a ceremonious ſigni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fication in euery religion. As amongſt Catholicks, a corner cappe, a Freers weede, eating of white meates, and not fleſhe vppon a friday. Amongſt other ſectes a miniſters apparell, an Idolatrous Preiſtes ordinary and prophane garment. And in this degree alſo they ſay, that wheras theſe thinges haue of them ſelues a good and conuenient vſe for the life of man, and the principall end of them is an honeſt humane vſe, not a religious ſignifica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion (neither trewly is a Freers weed, although it ſignifie a Freer, ſo religiouſe as a Surpleſſe, Cope, Tunicle, or ſuch like, whoſe principall and onely end is religion:) wheras alſo the common practiſe of mans life hath as it were by a long preſcription obtained, that ſuch thinges in time of danger may
<pb n="137" facs="tcp:283:76"/>be vſed, for their ciuill end, not regarding their re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligious ſignification: it ſhall be lawfull for to ſaue a mans life, or for other neceſſary and important good, to weare a corner cappe, or Freers weed, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though theſe holy ſignes were vſed in a falſe and deteſtable religion: Alſo to eate fleſh on a friday, to putte on a miniſters, or Purſeuants apparell, or ſuch like. Neither were a miniſter vnder paine of mortall ſinne, preſently bound to put of his cloake or Ierkin after his conuerſion, nor a Purſeuant to throwe away his dreadfull badge; which he ſhold neceſſarily doe, if it were a mortall ſinne to vſe the ſame.</p>
               <p>You haue now 3 degrees of ſignes or tokens of a falſe religion, and the common doctrine of De<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uines of their lawfull vſe and practiſe.<note place="margin">Certaine neceſſary cir<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>cumſtances in the vſe of the ſignes aforeſaied.</note> yet are not theſe degrees altogither indifferent of them ſelues but with certaine circumſtances onely to be practi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed, and not otherwiſe. that is, firſt, with neceſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty. for otherwiſe the wholle action and the ſigni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fication alſo, ſhould delighte, which cannot be without ſinne. Secondlye that it be ſeldome: as ſuch neceſſity happeneth ſeldome. but that it may be preuented. Thirdly, that there concurre not ſuch circumſtances therwith, that there be an ef<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fectuall profeſſion of religion. as if one vſing a mi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſters apparell for to hide his religion, ſhould w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> all prepare him ſelfe as it were, to ſay hereticall ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice, or to preach, or ſuch like, although he meant it not: or if one ſhould do any thing indifferent in it ſelfe, in maner aforeſaide, but commaunded for contempt of trew religion.</p>
               <p>Fourthly that ſcandall and daunger of infection
<pb n="138" facs="tcp:283:77"/>be auoided, which in familiar conuerſation with thoſe of a contrary ſecte doth ordinarily vſe to hap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pen.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="4"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Aſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctrue which hath no other vſe but to be a marke of religion</note> But beſides theſe indifferent vſes of ſuch actions or garments, there is the fourth degree: when gar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments or actions either of their owne nature, or by common iudgement and eſtimation of men, haue no other conuenient or honeſt vſe, but onely to be certaine markes or tokens of religion. for the vſe of ſuch maner of thinges, is of it ſelfe euill: and can neuer be admitted without mortall ſinne. as for to weare a garment with an Idoll painted ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>in, or the ſigne of the moone which the Turkes vſe for Mohometts honour: or to haue an Idoll in a mans houſe with an aultar before it, or other re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligiouſe ſigne: this is altogither vnlawfull, becauſe it is by the conmmo<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> eſtimation of men, eſteemed as a neceſſary ſigne of religion, and for no other end vſed, and therfore no more indifferent, than to caſt incenſe into the fier before an Idoll, and with the intention to referre it vnto the trew God.</p>
               <p>Wherfore al Deuines conclude that ſuch a ſigne in the very inſtant of ſuch a mans conuerſion is to be preſently lefte: neither poſſible to be continued without remaining in the eſtate of mortall ſinne. Such markes amongſt Proteſtants I thinke you haue none. But amongſt Catholicks, ſuch a ſigne were a paire of beades: which onely to weare at our girdle, if Catholike religion were not the truth, were a damnable ſinne.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> There is yet the higheſt degree of all,<note place="margin">A ſigne di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtinctiue which is a</note> in which your going to Church ſhalbe lodged and harbou<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red. that is when a man vſeth ſuch ſignes or acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons,
<pb n="139" facs="tcp:283:77"/>as of their owne nature &amp; common conſent,<note place="margin">very cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mony of re<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ligion.</note> or practiſe of all nations are onely appointed to be ceremonious actions of religion. Such for to vſe, and to apply vnto a falſe ſecte, or to a Schiſmaticall congregation, is a manifeſt ſigne of the ſame ſect, and of vnion with the ſame conciliable or falſe co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregation.<note place="margin">See §. 7.</note> This made deuoute Naaman for to feare, leaſt his kneeling, when the King kneeled, ſhould haue bene thought as donne to the Idoll. which in deed if it had bene ſo iudged, and not on<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly materially donne before the Idoll, without any ceremonious ſignification: coulde not any way haue bene iuſtified. but his kneeling to aide and aſſiſt his Prince, to whom he owed that dewtifull te<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>porall ſeruice, conuenient vnto his Princely great<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes: was not thought by any man to be vnto the Idoll, whom all the people knew he deteſted.<note place="margin">See §. 6.</note> And for this cauſe is Iehu condemned by the generall conſent of Doctours, for his diſſembled vſe of an action of the owne nature ſignifying a ceremony of Baalls religion and honour. Vnto this place and lodgeing muſt I of neceſſity vſſher your ſelfe, and all your companions. whoſe action of going to the ſeruice of hereticks (as I haue proued before) hath as intrinſecall a ſignification of hereſy and ſchiſme, as the deuoute going of a Catholickc to Maſſe in a catholicke congregation, hath a pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſion of Catholicke faith, and of Catholicke vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty and religion. yet is it here to be noted that as in wordes, which haue the principall place amongſt ſignes of the minde and affection of man, there may ſometimes be themateriall vſe or ſuppoſition thereof, without the formall, as the Logicioners
<pb n="140" facs="tcp:283:78"/>teach: So there may alſo be in any action, which ſignifieth religion. An example we brought aboue of one which did onely relate the diſloiall wordes ſpoken of Auguſtus: who onely vſed thoſe words materially, without any formall ſignification ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>of on his parte. So alſo did we bring an example before of a materiall ve of ſignes and ceremonies of religion, whan we according to the common doctrine of Deuines affirmed, that the materiall ſhew of Idolatry in a play or Comedy, was not of it ſelfe vnlawfull. Yet notwithſtanding as we ſaye that Sacrifice vnto Idolls, and contumelious ſpea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ches vnto his Prince are of them ſelues vnlawfull: So doe we ſay of ſignes of religion, namely of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church. For we alwaies take ſuch acti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons with the formall therof: which is the ſignifi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cation. which whan it is to be thought preſent or abſent, the common eſtimation of men muſt de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cide by the conſideration of time, perſon, place, and ſuch like. And ſo wee ſay that going to the Church in an orderly maner as it is vſed in our cou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> trey, cannot be voide by all mens eſtimation of ſignification of hereſy, and of contempt of verety, as hath bene proued</p>
               <p>Than doe I conclude that the graue cenſure of Deuines condemning Caietanes opinion as too ſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uere,<note place="margin">Why Caie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taines opi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion is thought too rigorouſe</note> connot be vnderſtood of theſe expreſſe and poſitiue ſignes of a contrary religion, but of the omiſſion onely of a ſigne of a trew religion. wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>in the reaſon is manifeſt. For a man is not bound alwaies to profeſſe his religion, but in time and place: yet is he bound in no time or place to deny his religion. So may a man omitte a ſigne of his
<pb n="141" facs="tcp:283:78"/>religion, when he is not expreſly interrogated: but he cannot, neither beeing asked, nor without aſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>king, vſe a ceremoniouſe ſigne of a contrary religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, without a moſt greeuous mortall ſinne. See than how you are deceiued whileſt you argue in this maner. If the Prince doe commaund me to weare a yellow cappe for proteſtation of my trew religion, I ſhall not deny my faith by leauing it; be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Prince cannot make a yellow cappe a ſigne of religion: Therfore if the Prince command me to go to the Church of heretickes, for ſigne of con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formity and adherency vnto his religion: I ſhall not deny my faith by doing it, becauſe he cannot make going to his Church a ſign eof his religion. Surely, Sir, he needeth not to make it a ſigne of his religion. for nature it ſelfe and the conſent of all nations, &amp; the iudgements of all men, not affrigh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted from their reaſonable vnderſtanding by terrour of hereticall perſecution: hath made it ſo already. And if you ſhould remaine in Bocardo vntill you had proued this conſequence, and reduced it to any lawfull moode or figure, you ſhould neuer come forth aliue.<note place="margin">A great di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fference be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tweene a ſigne of trew &amp; of falſe religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on.</note> That I may ſaye nothing of the difference betweene a ſigne of trewe &amp; of falſe reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion. For the trew religion may be proteſted onely by ceremonies ordained by God and his Church: And therfore a temporall Prince cannot make a proteſtatiue ſigne therof. But as a falſe religion may be by a temporall Prince inſtituted and follo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wed: ſo may the ceremonies, and proteſtations, and diſtinctiue ſignes therof be framed alſo accor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding to his peculier imagination. A man may con<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>temne God and his Church, by houlding vpp his
<pb n="142" facs="tcp:283:79"/>finger, whan by a blaſphemous co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>uenticle it were ſo agreed: but I thinke he could not pleaſe God ſo much by houlding vpp his finger for his honour, as he may diſpleaſe him with the contrary intenti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, in the ſelfe ſame action. Neither doe I thinke any ſo wiſe, as to make that a generall ſigne of Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke religion and vnity.</p>
               <p>Lett this than be our finall concluſion in this pointe,<note place="margin">The co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>clu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſion of this wholle laſt diſcourſe.</note> that although an Infidell Prince cannot make vs determinate ſignes of proteſtation of our onely trew religion, yett may hee make proteſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiue ſignes of his owne Religion; which cannot be practiſed without mortall ſinne: as we ſee in e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uery falſe religion to be in vſe. In Mahomets reli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gion to kiſſe his toumbe. IN Iewiſh, to be circum<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed. In Caluins, to receiue his communion, or to be at his ſeruice.<note place="margin">Sozom. l. 5. c. 16.</note> Which thing in Iulian the Apo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtata his time, made diuerſe Chriſtians to repent their folly. who hauing put incenſe into the fire before the Emperour, ſuppoſing it to haue bene donne accordin gto ſome auncient law &amp; cuſtome of the Romans, onely to his honour: vnderſtood afterward, that the Emperour tooke it as a ſigne of Idolatry: wherfore they with open proteſtati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on returned to let the Emperour know their Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian intent, and were baniſhed the courte for the ſame.</p>
               <p>Moreouer I ſay that this ſigne of going to the Church with hereticke<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>s, is whether the Prince will or no, of the owne nature a ſigne of hereſie: and ſo not made by any lawe a ſigne diſtinctiue, neither in any caſe to be iuſtified by the Princes commaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dement.</p>
               <pb n="143" facs="tcp:283:79"/>
               <p>As fot your Proteſtation wee haue long ſince ouerthrowen it; ſaying,<note place="margin">See §. 16. &amp; §. 31.</note> that for all your contrary minde, it is an exteriour ſigne of hereſy: euen as in Marcellinus &amp; others, there minde was knowen to be diſagreeing to their exteriour Idolatry. And beſides, that if it were poſſible that your Proteſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion might take away ſignification of hereſy: yet it ca<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>not but leaue ſignificatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of ſchiſme &amp; conte<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>pt.<note place="margin">Going to Caluins Church not made firſt vnlaw full by any late Canon</note>
               </p>
               <p>The ſecond thing which I inferre of that which hath bene ſaied in this wholle diſcourſe, is the ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nifeſt diſcouery of the malicious enuye which our aduerſaries: alwaies, not onely cary in their minds, but moſt cruelly and odiouſly diſcloſe both many other waies, and eſpecially in all Arraignements of Prieſtes and other Catholickes. For I perceiue by your owne confeſſion, that the greateſt motiue of your going to the Churches of Proteſtants, is the feare of being eſteemed a hollow and diſſembling ſubiect. And ſurely, I neuer ſaw ſo farre into the drift of our aduerſaries, as I haue bene put in mind of, by the peruſing of your letter. They ſeeke to diſcreditt all Prieſtes, and the lay Catholicke with the Bulle of Pius .5 w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> although it is well knowen to haue come forth before ſome of the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> were borne, yea &amp; before the moſt parte of them were of yeres of diſcretion: yet they muſt needes, forſooth, be acceſſary vnto the ſame: becauſe they are not con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formable in tis one action of coming to their de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uine ſeruice. For this cauſe they read it openly at the barre, being faithfully tranſlated by ſome ho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>norable learned Counſeller (as they ſay) &amp; are not afraide to publiſh that thing vnto the wholle mul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>titude of trew and faithfull ſubiectes, which wee
<pb n="144" facs="tcp:283:80"/>woulde faine haue drowned in perpetuall obli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uion. They very odiouſly charge vs, that wee re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fuſe to go to their Church, for that Pius 5. hauing ſent forth that Bull, and reckoned vpp the cauſes therof: amongſt other thinges maketh forſooth, one of the crimes condemned, the vſing and com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maunding to be vſed by others, certaine impious myſteries (for ſo you ſay he calleth them) and cere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>monies according to Caluins preſcript. for which as well as for the other, hee declareth not onely the principall, but alſo the adherents in any ſuch matters there recited, to haue already incurred the ſentence of excommunication, and to be cutte off from the vnity of Chriſt his body. This you ſaye you heare to your exceeding reproach, at euery barr and iudgemente ſeate in London. wherfore you are enforced (for to make knowen your faithfull allegeance) to ſhewe in effect, that you haue no parte at all of the blame of that Bull. whether this be trew or not: that is, whether ſuch be the effect of the ſame Bull, or no: I proteſt vnto you that I know not: and that, for the naturall loue, and loi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all affection I beare vnto my ſoueraigne: I neuer did read the ſame. This your ſelfe is very priuy vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to, I doubt not, that ſo long as you haue bene a Catholike, and ſo continually conuerſed amongſt Prieſts &amp; lay Catholikes, you neuer heard any one worde, or neuer ſo litle ſignification of ſo vnplea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſaunt a thing. And withall, you perfectly ſhould know, as well by the truth of the matter it ſelfe, as by many publicke proteſtations and ſolemne aſſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tions, that there is not one Catholicke in England, but beareth as dewtifull and harty affection vnto
<pb n="145" facs="tcp:283:80"/>his moſt deare Soueraigne, ſince ſuch Bull or de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>claration: as either before the ſame, or if any ſuch thing had neuer come forth. In ſo much y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> looke what we might haue lawfully donne before with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>out preiudice of our Relgion, and diſuniting our ſelues from that body, of which euery one of vs muſt neceſſarily liue and dye a member: the ſame we will in moſt dewtifull maner, and with moſte ſincere and vnfained loue, whatſoeuer otherwiſe malicious tongues geue out, euen as we looke for heauen, and the fauour of our redeemer: continu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ally performe vnto our death.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="36" type="section">
               <pb facs="tcp:283:81"/>
               <pb n="147" facs="tcp:283:81"/>
               <head>§. 36.</head>
               <p>How needles a thing it is to bring forth the au<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tority of the Cannon law,<note place="margin">THE FIFTH PARTE The 17 obiection that we haue no expreſſe Canon or auncient practiſe of the Church</note> and example &amp; practiſe of Gods Church, in this queſtion which we han<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dle: I hope it doth already remaine manifeſt. For that which out of infallible groundes of holy ſcrip<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture is ſo neceſſarily concluded, what neceſſity is there by humane lawes or cuſtomes to confirme? That which is enacted by the moſt ſacred Canons of the word of God, and the immediate inditing of his holy ſpirit, who will require to bee by hu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mane iudgement approued? eſpecially wheras (as I ſaid aboue) if this actio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> were only co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>trary vnto hu<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>mane lawes although ſuch humane lawes may vndoubtedly bind euen in perill of death:) yet is it to be ſuppoſed that our tender mother y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church, ſo carefull of vs in other matters, and extending her ſoueraigne power ouer our ſoules to the diſpenſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion in moſt extraordinary caſes: would not in ſo great hazardes and daungers as on euery ſide en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiron vs, hould the bridle ſo ſtraite,<note place="margin">1. Cor. 3.</note> but in the per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſon of Chriſt, according to S. PAVLES example, confirme her charity towardes vs, leaſt we be circu<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uented by Satan. Beſides, I know very well, how many there haue bene heretofore,<note place="margin">It were re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quiſite y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the defenders of ſchiſme ſhoulde alleage Canons.</note> who haue ſhew<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ed herin their learned induſtry. So that I maruaile not a litle, that you who ſeeke to tranſgreſſe the bondes which your ſpirituall Fathers &amp; Founders of this new of ſpring of religion, haue w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſo greate piety and vnwearied pacience laied before you: do not rather bring forth ſome auncient Canon, or practiſe of auncient times, to colour at the leaſt, if not to defend your folly. For whan was it euer
<pb n="148" facs="tcp:283:82"/>heard of in all ages ſince Chriſt his time, that a Ca<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tholicke orderly and religiouſly went to heretickes Sinagogues? Infinite places of Fathers, innumera<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ble examples of Saintes with the ſacred Canons of eccleſiaſticall diſcipline condemne it: not one ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>proueth it.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Heretickes ſometimes haue come to Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke congre<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>gations Theod. l. 4. c. 17. l. de geſt. cum Emerito. initio. L. 5. ep. 33. Theod. l. 5. c. 32.</note> That Heretickes or Schiſmatickes haue come to Catholicke congregations, therin geuing token of their ſubmiſſion, we read. As their holy mother deſireth nothing more than theire reunion: So came Valens the Emperour to S. Baſils Maſſe, &amp; offered therat: So was S. Auguſtine and all his Catholicke fellow Biſhopps deſirous of the Dona<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiſtes returne. So alſo would S. Ambroſe his ſoul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diers of the Emperours gard haue willingly way<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted on their Lord to S. Ambroſe his Church: And S. Chryſoſtome profeſſed vnto Gainas an Arrian, that his Church was open for all which woulde come thither to pray: In like maner hath the wiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dome of the Church releaſed vnto vs the auncient bond of auoiding heretickes, or any excommuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate perſon euen in Diuine ſeruices. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> 
                  <note place="margin">The bond of auoiding heretickes in part en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>larged</note> (I ſay) in Di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uine ſeruices not in Caluines deuiſes) ſo long as they are not by name declared: Wheras before, euen ſince the Apoſtles, we were bound to auoide them in diuerſe thinges, which the Canoniſtes &amp; Deuines from auncient time, doe expreſſe by this verſe.</p>
               <p>OS, ORARE, VALE, CO<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>MVNIO, MENSA NEGATVR.</p>
               <p>Wherby all maner not only of ciuill conuerſatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, but alſo of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication in ſpirituall ceremonies, yea euen of the onely lawfull holy Diuine ſeruice of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church is vnderſtood to haue bene forbidde<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>.
<pb n="149" facs="tcp:283:82"/>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="4"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Preſence at Maſſe in a Catholicke Church lawfull a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mongſt ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer ſo many heretickes</note> Hereupon I know very well that (as I ſaide aboue) in a Catholicke Church, ſo long as the name and title therof and maner of ſeruice is Catholicke, a man may be preſent at Maſſe, although the wholle company therof, yea the Prieſt him ſelfe were here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticall: So that they were in ſuch maner heretickes, either ſecret, or publickly knowen, that they made not that their ſeuerall congregation: but for feare, or ſome worldly reſpectes, or that they allowing the Maſſe, diſſenting in other pointes from Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke vnion, came to that place, as to a Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke place, not of any ſeuerall right, or vnity w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> they pretended therin. For ſo long as we doe not participate with the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in their ſeuerall Altar by them erected, nor in thoſe thinges which doe deuide the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> from Gods Church: we ſhall not deuide our ſelues from Eccleſiaſticall vnity.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="5"/> 
                  <note place="margin">How ſome Deuines, do ſay that it is lawfull whan there is no danger of infection or ſcandall</note> Farther then this, I alſo am not ignorant (as hath bene ſaied before) how y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> without any breach of Canonicall precept now in vſe, a knowen Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke, in a citty, either vniuerſally Catholike, or for the moſt parte hereticall, may vpon curioſity, or ſome other deſire of mocking or diſturbing the hereticall ſeruice, in ſome Church of theirs be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent at their ſeruice and ſermon, ſo that he be ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nifeſtly knowen not to come as one of them, and altogither he keepe him ſelfe from any ceremoni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe ſhew of cappe, or knee, or colour of confor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mity, or of vnlawfull obedience, exacted for the creditte of ſuch religion or ſeruice. Such a one, I know, by diuerſe to be allowed, or at the leaſt, not to be condemned of mortall ſinne, ſo that there be neither perill of infection, nor ſcandall. For this
<pb n="150" facs="tcp:283:83"/>mans going I know to be materiall, as when Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtians enter for ſuch intent, into Iewes Sinagogues at Rome, or elſe where. And it is not formall, be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe he neither ſheweth any reuerence, or con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formity, nor is exacted of contempt, or for ſhewe of ſuch conformity or vnion in theire ſeruice or ſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>craments to be preſent. Although I know ſuch practiſe to be farre diuerſe from the cuſtome of the moſt pure time of the Primitiue Church,<note place="margin">C. 59.</note> whan as we reade in the Eliberin Councell, it was ſtrictly forbidden that none ſhould go vnto the publicke places of Sacrifices, euen onely fo to ſee ſuch Ido<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>latry. And if we conſider the caſe aright, we ſhall plainly perceaue, that the ſeeing, or hearing, yea the thinking of hereticall Sinagogues and ſeruices, is rather a thing fitt with ſorow to burſt the harte than to feed any curious mindes, with the pleaſure of other mens miſeries.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="6"/> 
                  <note place="margin">Of the pra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctiſe of Scotland.</note> Moreouer, I vnderſtand alſo that in Scotland (which many peruerſely will haue a patterne for England, wheras it were greater equity, that con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trariwiſe, that countrey ſhoulde learne of ours, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> hath bene with ſo many holy laboures, and bloody conflictes of moſte holy Martyrs, inſtructed and embrewed:) I vnderſtand I ſay, that in Scotland a certaine tolleration hath bene. but, of what? of going to hereticall Churches? No Sir, of no ſuch thing: But wheras there wanteth that perfect reſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lutio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> which ought to be in Catholickes, who muſt beare euery where Chriſtes Croſſe and ignominy: that ſuch as being otherwiſe Catholickly affected, will not refraine from the heretickes Sinagogues, and theire Schiſmaticall practiſes: may yet as other
<pb n="151" facs="tcp:283:83"/>hainous ſinners are, be admitted vnto Diuine ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice: and notwithſtanding theire excommunica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion, wher with they are tied, be exempted from this particuler effect of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Churches cenſure. which that y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Pope may graunt: no man doubteth, who knoweth that ſuch impediment proceedeth onely from his owne lawe. And that he hath graunted it: I haue vnderſtood by thoſe who haue in this pointe conferred w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſuch as very well haue knowen the matter. But that he worthely graunted it vnto that countrey: I doe nothing doubte: wheras it was ſo expedient to allure the ignorant people to the ſeruices of the Church almoſt growen altogi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther out of theire remembrance and liking. But neither was it the Popes intention to abſolue them in this maner from theire excommunication, nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther are they continewing in this eſtate capeable of any ſacramentall abſolution, or ſufficiently diſpo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed to the ſacred communion of Chriſtes holy Bo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dy and Blood: And therfore neuer admitted (whi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leſt they ſo perſiſt) to the participation of any Sa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>crament at all. Neither can the Pope, nor y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> wholl Church of God, (as I am alſo moſt aſſured they will not) diſpenſe any otherwiſe in communicati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, either with Heretickes or Schiſmatickes: but ſo farre onely as we ſhall not communicate in their crime: which alwaies is whan wee aſſociate our ſelues vuto them in the higheſt degree of theire crime, which is in their ſpirituall congregations.</p>
               <p>All this though I willingly &amp; plainly yeeld vnto you: yet it auaileth you nothing. For it ſtandeth you vppon, to proue, that it is lawfull for to go to heretickes Churches, ſo that neither in reſpect of
<pb n="152" facs="tcp:283:84"/>the maner of your going, which is religiouſe and deuoute: neither in reſpect of the motiue of your going, which is obedience to a law commaunding a religiouſe going: neither in reſpect of the vnion betweene you and the reſt which are there, which is eſteemed by your orderly preſence: you may iuſt<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ly be thought to conforme your ſelfe to the wholle Sinagogue. This if you can proue, or bring any one expreſſe Canon, or manifeſt ſentence of ap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>prooued Father, to maintaine ſuch opinion: you ſhall haue the victory: And I will not onely ceaſe to diſproue your action, but I will alſo commend the ſame. Neither am I ſo wedded vnto my owne opinion, nor ſo doting vpon my owne conceites, but I would willingly yeeld to the auncient truth. And whan I could not vnderſtand the reaſon it ſelfe; I would thinke it a chiefe reaſon, to ſubmitte my reaſo<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> to my betters. Yea this I do ſincerely pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teſt vnto you, that for the deſire of both ſpirituall and temporall good of my deare countrey, which I know might enſew, if this action were found by Gods lawe, and the ſacred Canons, tollerable: I ſhould ſo reioiſe at ſuch a profitable inuentio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, that I ſhould not eſteeme of a ſtrawe, if withall for this doctrine here ſet downe, and the like taught here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tofore: I ſhould remaine infamous and marked with perpetuall ignominy in this world. But too cleare is the caſe, and ſo well confirmed and eſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bliſhed by generall conſent, &amp; practiſe of all ages: that to call it into doubt, ſeemeth vnto me no o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>therwiſe, than if a man in the brighteſt noone time of the yeere, ſhould hauing his eyeſight, yet grope for the way.</p>
               <pb n="153" facs="tcp:283:84"/>
               <p>And you, Sir, &amp; thoſe alſo, who ſeeke to make them ſelues Patrons &amp; maintainers of ſuch ſchiſme and deteſtable practiſe,<note place="margin">It is ridicu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lous now to call this matter into queſtion</note> in this examination or ra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther condemnation of the learned iudgement of your Superiours, and of diuerſe holy prieſles, wor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thy of theire function, and of the great reward w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> they haue receiued, that is of walking with Chriſt him ſelfe. IN ALEIS QVONIAM DIGNI SVNT, be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cauſe they waſhed their garments, and as it were,<note place="margin">Ap. 3. Ap. 7.</note> bleached them with the blood of the Lambe: you I ſay, and your companions or Fathers (if there be any Prieſt, which hath newly bene your ghoſtly Father, to begette you to the Deuell) after ſo many gloriouſe confeſſions, after ſo many deathes, after ſo huge forfeitures of goods &amp; landes, after ſo gre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uous diſgraces of the world, onely for this pointe, which you impugne, incurred: in examining now whether it be right or wrong: ſeeme to doe as ri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diculouſly, as I haue heard to be vſed in ſome pla<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces not farre from you, where they firſt hang the malefactour, and afterward conſulte of his deſerte of death. From which places, euen as ſome very pleaſantly haue made a forme of a certain Letany, that they may eſcape: So doe I deſire our good Lord to deliuer all his people from ſuch AFTER IVDGES as your ſelfe and your companions are.</p>
               <p>But leaſt I ſhould ſeeme to leane ouermuch to my owne diſcourſes, or to the ſentence and opini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of our late Founders and Apoſtles of our reco<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uery, vnto me alwaies moſt graue and reuerend: I entend, with as much breuity as I may, to enter into the conſideration of the Canons, and practiſe of the Church: that we may ſee, how truth is euer
<pb n="154" facs="tcp:283:85"/>conſtant, and neuer diſagreeing to it ſelfe. Yet in all Chriſtian charity I thinke it firſt neceſſary by the way to geue you this fraternall admonition:<note place="margin">The proud arrogancy of the defe<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ders of ſchiſme</note> that whileſt you and others. ſcarce out of the A B C whan this doctrine was firſt vniuerſally publiſhed, by ſuch as now liuing, for learning, autority, and vertew, you or they haue not yet ouertaken; do ſet ſo light by theire ſacred cenſure: you ſhewe your ſelues ſcarce as yet entered into the A B C of true vertew and mortification, and perfect purgation of hereticall dragges of Pride and ſingularity. And to all godly Catholickes worthy of the glory of that name, &amp; of the generall renoume of conſtant confeſſion of theire faith, now made publicke in the wholle world, and regiſtred vnto eternall me<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mory: I ſay with S PAVL,<note place="margin">2. Tim. 3.</note> reaſoning of the dan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gerous times, into which it ſeemeth we are now fallen: of you, and of your fathers, and followers: ET HOS DEVITA. and ſuch doe you auoide.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="37" type="section">
               <head>§. 37.</head>
               <p>In the manner alſo of requiring the teſtimonies of antiquity,<note place="margin">what pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceeding is to be vſed in exami<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ning the Canons &amp; Fathers</note> you deale as ridiculouſly, as if a man by the co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mon ſentence of all the Iudges &amp; lawiers of the Realme, condemned for a Robbery donne in Coome Parke, ſhould pleade that he could not iuſtly be hanged, becauſe in all the lawe there is no mention made, that he which robbeth in Coome Parke ſhould be hanged. All Scriptures, all Fathers all Canons are full of moſt ſeuere thunderings a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt your actio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, and yet is it not enough to con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>demne ſuch breakers of Gods peace and his Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian vnity, but we muſt haue forſooth, euery par<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticuler accident of your acte, the time, place, man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ner,
<pb n="155" facs="tcp:283:85"/>intention, and circumſtances all ſette downe by Propheſie before hand, &amp; ſo condemned. This may well ſerue you to cauill for a while, yet cannot it hinder the moſt iuſt Iudge to pronounce vpon you dew ſentence, and deſerued puniſhment.</p>
               <p>That we may not deny our faith, that we may not make any outward ſhew of falſe religion,<note place="margin">what can<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>not be de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nied in this poynte w<hi rend="sup">t</hi>-out hereſy</note> that we may not diſunite the Church of Chriſt, or de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uide his holy garment, that we may not contemne his ſpouſe, or any waies participate with her traite<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rous rebells in their rebellion: it is ſo cleare in Scrip<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tures, Canons, Fathers, and perpetuall cuſtome of auncient Ages; that to deny it, or to doubt of it, were a moſt deteſtable hereſy. But becauſe they name not Caluins hereſy, nor make any mention of England, nor touch your Parliaments, nor Eng<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>liſhe obedience, nor high Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>miſſioners, nor chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diſhe awe: therfore thoſe generall rules are not to be applied to your Churches, Countreis, Parlia<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments, Intentions; which whileſt you maintaine: ſee alſo if there were a law made in England to de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fend murder, whether ſome alſo wold not require an expreſſe Canon to condemn ſo horrible a crime.</p>
               <p>But as I haue hitherto dealte with you out of Scriptures, and the ſtedfaſt groundes of Diuinity: So will I now deale out of Canons and cuſtomes of the Church: ſo that you will promiſe me, to co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>feſſe your ſelfe as well included in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> generall lawes of Chriſtians: as you hope to bee included in the generall promiſes of Chriſt, and muſt whether you will or no, be included in his generall threatnings.<note place="margin">The deuiſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of that which fol<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>loweth.</note>
               </p>
               <p>I will therfore deuide this laſt peice of my diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>courſe into three partes. And firſt ſhew what hath
<pb n="156" facs="tcp:283:86"/>bene obſerued from auncient times of auoiding heretickes vniuerſally, euen in all ciuill conuerſati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on. Secondly of auoiding them in their ſeruice &amp; ceremonies of theire religion. Thirdly of the like care of ſhunning alſo ſuch as are onely Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes, euen in their lawfull rites and ceremonies.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="38" type="section">
               <head>§. 38.</head>
               <p>Concerning the firſt pointe,<note place="margin">Of the gene<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>rall bond of auoiding Heretickes. Mat. 18. 1. Cor. 5.</note> I need not to be ve<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry long: conſidering the charge of Chriſt co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding vs to account thoſe which diſobey the Church as heathens and publicans: and the doctrine of S. PAVL, that with ſuch perſons we muſt not eate and drinke: And the admonition of<note n="*" place="margin">ep. 2.</note> S. IHON, who warneth vs, that to an hereticke, or any erro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neous Doctour (ſuch are thoſe alſo, which teach that it is lawfull to go to the Church) who ſaieth God ſaue you, communicateth with his wicked workes. This did the ſame S. IHON teach vs al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſo by his example:<note place="margin">Iren. l. 3. c. 3 S. Ihon E<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uangeliſt.</note> whan he ſuddainly departed from the Bath, in which Cerinthus the enemy of truth did bath him ſelfe: ſaying, that he feared the ruine of the houſe,<note place="margin">
                     <hi>S.</hi> Policarpe</note> becauſe of his preſence. S. Po<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lycarpe alſo, out of whom S. Ireneus reporteth the former example, ſheweth how diligent a follower he was of the holy Apoſtles of Chriſt, with whom he had bene familier. who would not ſo much as afford vnto<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> Marcion an Arch-heriticke, a good looke: but when hee meeting him, deſired him that he would know him: he ſaied, I know thee for Satans eldeſt ſonne. Such care had the Apo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtles and their diſciples not ſo much as to ſpeake vnto thoſe, which went about with their deceitfull leaſinges to ſalſifye the truth. Euen as S. PAVL
<pb n="157" facs="tcp:283:86"/>doth warne. A man that is an hereticke, after the firſt and ſecond admonition, auoide: knowing,<note place="margin">Tit. 3.</note> that he that is ſuch a one, is ſubuerted, &amp; ſinneth: beeing condemned by his owne iudgement. All this doth Euſebius<note n="*" place="margin">l. 4. c. 13.</note> reporte of theſe Saintes, out of Ireneus: ſo that you haue in one thing the autori<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty of many. of Euſebius: S. Ireneus: S. Policarpus: S. PAVL: and S. IOHN.<note place="margin">S. De nis.</note>
               </p>
               <p>The ſame rigour we reade to haue bene obſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued by S. Dioniſius an auncient Biſhoppe of Alex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>andria, whoſe owne wordes Euſebius thus citeth.<note place="margin">l. 7. c. 6.</note> This Canon, and this example did I receaue of our bleſſed Father Heraclas.<note place="margin">S. Heraclas.</note> For hee caſt out of the Church ſuch as had departed from the Church, (not ſo yet but that they in corporall preſence were partakers of the congregation of the faithfull) wha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> they were accuſed, that they had much conuerſed with one of thoſe, which defended a contrary do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctrine vnto the Church. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>Finally you know very well, that if this were the auncient cuſtome of the Church towards all excommunicate perſons,<note place="margin">11. q. 3. c. cum excom<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>municato &amp; ſequenti &amp; preced. Chryſ. ho. 25. in c. 11. ad hebr. 1. Cor. 5. In vita. S. Antho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies laſt will.</note> which were neither here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes, nor ſchiſmatickes according to S. PAVLES doctrine, who ſpeaking of all ſuch deuided mem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bers commaundeth not to eate with them: you may much more know the ſtricte kinde of bond in auoiding heretickes and ſchiſmatickes. Which leſſon the glorious S. Anthony a moſt perfect ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſter of all holines and Chriſtian dewty, not onely taught by example, but leſte vnto his ſchollers for his laſt will and teſtament. Heare (ſaieth he) my children, the laſt will of your Father. And preſent<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly: To the Meletians and Schiſinatickes doe you
<pb n="158" facs="tcp:283:87"/>not come neere: neither ioine your ſelues in 'com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>munication with the Arrians. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Thus much as in ſo cleare a caſe for this firſt point ſhall ſuffice.</p>
               <p>But becauſe I know very well,<note place="margin">Two kinds of tollerati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons in co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>munication with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes</note> that you will ſay that this cuſtome is now worne out in the Church of Chriſt, &amp; you ſee not the moſt zealous Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licks of all to be ſo ſcrupulous in auoiding hereticks ciuill conuerſation, as theſe examples doe ſeeme to require: I muſt neceſſarily ſay ſomewhat of two kind of Tollerations, which hath iuſtly enlarged the auncient ſeuerity of the Church herein. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> 
                  <note place="margin">c. quoniam multos 11. q. 3. &amp; ſeq.</note> The firſt is neceſſity: wherby wiues, children, ſeruants, bondſlaues, are permitted to communicate in ci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uill thinges with thoſe, to whom they belong. Al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſo trauailers, &amp; ſtrangers, for their neceſſary helpes might of olde haue ordinary traficke in places of excommunicate perſons: This tolleration hath a grounde in S. PAVLES doctrine:<note place="margin">1. Cor. 5. See Saint Chriſoſt. ci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted before</note> who to the Corinthians writeth in this manner. I wrote vnto you in an epiſtle, not to keepe company with for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicatours: I meane not the fornicatours of this world: otherwiſe you ſhould haue gonne out of this world: But if he y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> is named a brother &amp;c. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Where he ſheweth a certaine neceſſity of ciuill co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerſation, with thoſe which make the wholle com<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>munity of the place where we abide, for otherwiſe as he ſaieth wee could not liue in this world. For which cauſe he geueth leaue<note n="*" place="margin">c. 10.</note> in the ſame epiſtle to go to an Infidells feaſt. So that we may ground this tolleration vppon an euident neceſſity, that whan we liue amongſt Infidells onely or for the moſt parte; although they be heretickes and fugi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiues from Gods Church: yet we may vſe ſuch ci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uill
<pb n="159" facs="tcp:283:87"/>conuerſation with them, as ſhall be neceſſary vnto vs: auoiding alwaies daunger of infection, and ſcandall. Thus farre may we bouldly aduen<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ture by the auncient permiſſion of the Church.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> But for the auoiding of many ſcandals and dan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gers of ſoules which might happen, and for y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> com<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>forte of fearefull conſciences, it hath ſeemed con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uenient vnto the wiſdome of the holy ghoſt, to yeelde a farther liberty.<note place="margin">Mart. 5. Ext. ad eui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tanda See Nauar. c. 27. n. 35</note> and euen in the countreis where moſt be Catholickes to graunt by the ſpeci<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all permiſſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of our holy mother the Church, that we may freely, in all maner of thinges, as well ſpi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rituall as temporall, communicate, with whoſoe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer, hauing incurred excommunication through ſome crime ſo puniſhed by y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> lawes of the Church, are not either ſpecially declared, and denounced to be ſo excommunicate, or manifeſtly and notori<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſly knowen to be ſtrikers of a Clergy man. And although ſome doe except from this tolleration all manifeſt exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate perſons, &amp; conſequently all manifeſt hereticks, according to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> limitation of the Councell of Conſtance: yet hath the cuſtome of the Church a trew interpreter of lawes, receiued this decree, with this generall enlargement: as it was alſo in the Councell of Baſill propounded. So that this tolleration muſt be generally vnderſtood, that euen with heretickes not by name excommu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate nor notorious ſtrikers of the Clergy, we may as well in ciuill as in ſpirituall thinges co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate. Whan I ſay ſpirituall things, I meane ſuch thinges as belong vnto the ſpirite of God: not the inuenti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ons, or ſociety of infernall ſpirits.</p>
               <p>But what manner of ſpirituall thinges Caluins
<pb n="160" facs="tcp:283:88"/>miſteries are, and of the vnderſtanding of this kind of tolleratio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>,<note place="margin">See §. 7.</note> enough hath bene ſaid aboue. Now muſt I warne you and whoſoeuer ſhall take the paines to geue the reading vnto this my writing: that theſe Tollerations in two caſes cannot be any warrant vnto vs at all,<note place="margin">No Tolle<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ration in two caſes.</note> they being in whatſoeuer caſe indiſpenſable. Firſt if we finde ſuch commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nication to be noiſome vnto our ſoules, ſo that we perceiue our ſelues to waxe colde in our feruour, and Catholicke reſolution of perſeuering in Chri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtian dewty, good life, and frequenting of Sacra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ments for this bond of auoiding ſpirituall daun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ger doth bind vs in euery ſinne, Secondly, if there be ioined withall, an expreſſe or virtuall deniall of our faith, or contempt of the Church, or ſuperſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tious behauiour or ſcandall: which in going to he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes Churches doe alwaies concurre. For euen as the aforeſaide tolleratio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> cannot make but if you in murder, thefte, fornication, Idolatry, commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicate with heretickes, you ſhall ſinne as much, as before the Tolleration: So is it in this caſe of go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church. That therfore which is good: you may by the tolleration aforeſaid, doe with he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>retickes: that which is euill, is as vnlawfull as euer before. And therfore in vnlawfull matters wee muſt haue recourſe vnto the auncient Apoſtolicall rule of auoiding moſt conſtantly heretickes; And eſpecially in their ſeruice: as a thing which can ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer be lawfull. For if a man may in putting of his cappe to the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, as S. IHON ſaith in his ſecond epiſtle co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate to their wicked works, becauſe he may geue the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> countenance &amp; encouragement to proſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cute the ſame: how much more ſhal he do the like
<pb n="161" facs="tcp:283:88"/>in the very toppe of their iniquity, which is in their ſeruice, &amp; co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>trary Aultar vnto Gods holy Church?</p>
            </div>
            <div n="39" type="section">
               <head>§ 39.</head>
               <p>For that alwaies, euen ſince the beginning,<note place="margin">what the Canons haue decre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ed of auoi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ding here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes Ser<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice. l. 6. hiſt. c. 3. Origen.</note> there hath bene amongſt trew Chriſtians an eſpeciall ac<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>count of communication with heretickes in theire praiers: the great learned clearke Origen, and moſt auncient Doctour, ſhall geue plaine teſtimonie. Of whom thus writeth Euſebius. Origen (ſaieth he) although being driuen by neceſſity, he conuer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſed in the ſame houſe with Paule an hereticke: yet euen at that time was he not affraide to ſhew eui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dent and open tokens of his trew and Catholicke opinion in matters of faith.<note place="margin">Going to hereticall conuenti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cles a toke<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of faith.</note> For when a great mul<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>titude, not only of heretickes, but alſo of our men, for the greate eloquence which was in Paule did flocke vnto him: Origen could notwithſtanding neuer be induced to be preſent at praiers with him: As who from his tender age had both ſeriouſly ob<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ſerued the Canon of the Church, and had alwaies deteſted the doctrines of errours. Thus Euſebius. Where I deſire you to marke thoſe wordes. Eui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dent and open tokens of his religion. To be pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſent at praiers. The Canon of the Church. And y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> condemnation of ſuch as being in minde Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lickes, were preſent with Paule at his praiers.<note place="margin">Diuers ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ners of pray<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ing with he retickes.</note>
               </p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> But we muſt neceſſarily make ſome diſtinction of diuerſe manners of praying with hereticks. The firſt manner is, whan they pray with vs, but Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholickly, that is either in a Catholicke congregati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on; or elſe priuately, but yet after a Catholicke forme and manner, which maketh ſuch ceremony not to be accounted as an hereticall ceremony, but
<pb n="162" facs="tcp:283:89"/>rather as Catholicke. So that here I doe not ſo much ſhew my ſelfe to communicate with the he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticke, as he to communicate with me. This was accounted in the auncient Church alwaies vnlaw<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full: vntill the Councèll of Conſtance and decree of Martinus the fifth. For this degree of commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nication being not of it ſelfe vnlawfull, neither im<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>plying any deniall or contempte of religion, nor v<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion with the hereticke in his diuiſion: as it was iuſtly forbidden at the firſt: ſo for the auoiding of many ſcandalls and daungers it was permitted after, as we lately ſaied. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> The ſecond maner of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municating with heretickes in praier, is when we co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate with them in their proper Churches: or if in priuate houſes, yet after their owne particu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ler forme and maner. And this was that which Origen refuſed. And although hee woulde no doubt haue refuſed alſo the firſt communication, as than being vnlawfull, according vnto auncient Canons than in force: yet was hee by Euſebius iudgement thought in refuſing this ſecond com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>munication, to haue ſhewed his Catholicke faith, which he ſhould haue denied if he had donne o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>therwiſe. This ſecond kind of praying with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticks, is in it ſelfe vnlawfull. For it importeth a par<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ticuler vnion and aſſociation in that, in which they haue cutte the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues from the houſe of DAVID, and erected a new Aultar, &amp; faſhioned new calues and new Gods, beſides him which cannot be true<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly worſhiped but in the trew ſpirituall Hieruſalem. <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> The third kind of communication with heretickes in praiers, is to receaue their baptiſme or ſacrifice, of whatſoeuer maner it be, or any kind of trew or
<pb n="163" facs="tcp:283:89"/>counterfaite Sacrament. And this is in the higheſt degree of ſpirituall co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munion with them, alwaies vnlawfull, and moſt deteſtable, as alſo the ſecond: although ſomewhat in a greater meaſure of ini<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>quity.</p>
               <p>Theſe three degrees, you ſhall now ſee plainly ſet downe, in three Canons of the Apoſtles: where by the diuerſe puniſhments contained, you may iudge of the greuouſnes of euery one.</p>
               <p>The 44 Canon hath thus. A Biſhopp, Prieſt,<note place="margin">The Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nons of the Apoſtles</note> or Deacon, which ſhall ioine prarers w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> hereticks: lett him be onely ſuſpended from Communion. But if alſo hee permitte them to doe any thing as Clerks: lett him be depoſed.</p>
               <p>In the 63 Canon ſo we read. If any Clearke, or lay man enter into the Sinagogue of the Iewes, or conuenticle of hereticks, that he may ioine prai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ers with them: lett him be depoſed and excluded from the Communion.</p>
               <p>Finally, this is the 45 Canon. The Biſhoppe or Prieſt which hath taken the baptiſme or ſacrifice of heretickes, we commaund to be depoſed. For what agreement is there betweene Chriſt and Beli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all? or what portion is there vnto a faithfull, with an Infidell? <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>Where although it pleaſed the holy Apoſtles to impoſe ſometimes puniſhments vpon the Clergy onely, as which of dewty ſhould be the forme of the flocke: yet doth both their reaſon, and the pra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctiſe of the Church, ſhew the thing to be vnlaw<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>full to euery faithfull Chriſtian.</p>
               <p>But here you very ſubtelly reply, that it is y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ming into heretickes Churches for that intent of
<pb n="164" facs="tcp:283:90"/>praier, which is condemned in the 63 Canoni: not the onely comming without any praier at all. Nay Sir: that is no good gloſſe. For the 44 Canon im<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>poſeth a ſmaller penance for praying with them, and that only to ſome degrees of the Clergy. Ther<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>fore, here is ſomething more than praying with them forbidden. and what is that, but going to their conuenticles? which going, becauſe they will diſtinguiſh from that going which may be ſome<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>times lawfull, they call it going for to pray. And it is alwaies vnderſtood that one goeth for to pray, whan he is orderly preſent, at the time of praier. Neither can mans iudgement, which ſearcheth not the harte, eſteeme otherwiſe. Neither did euer the cuſtome of the Church (according to the politicke and new deuiſed intentions) interpret the preſence of a man at ſeruice or Maſſe, but as a communica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tion in praier. For which cauſe good Catholickes were alwaies bounde to auoide the Chappell or Church whan any exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate perſon in none of the tollerable degrees ſhewed before, entered in. Which if he did not, he reputed him ſelfe to haue co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municated with him in praier:<note place="margin">Nauar. c. 27 n. 20. The 4. Cou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> cell of Car<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thage. c. 71. &amp; 72.</note> howſoeuer lewd<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly or idlely diſpoſed the exco<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate perſon was. Thus much of the Canons of the Apoſtles.</p>
               <p>The 4 Councell of Carthage where S. Augu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtine was preſent, thus honourably ſpeaketh of your Churches. The Conuenticles of heretickes are not Churches, but Conciliables. with them we muſt neither praye, nor ſing. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Where if you make the ſame reply as before: I geue you alſo the ſame anſwere. And a new reaſon alſo for both. For wheras praier with them is vnlawfull, onely
<pb n="165" facs="tcp:283:90"/>for this reſpect, that we doe make our ſelues ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>by of their co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munion or fellowſhip: what doubt is there but in ſignification of this vnity, it is all one to pray with them, and to ſeeme to pray with the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>? Or who doubteth, but that a ſhrewd wanton boy, kneeling in his mothers preſence, at his praiers; may ſatisfy her (who knoweth not his minde, al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>though ſhe be his mother) as well in mouing his lippes onely, and knocking his beades, as if he had praied with greateſt deuotion?</p>
               <p>The Councell of Antioch.<note place="margin">The Coun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cell of An<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tioch c. 2.</note> With excommuni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate perſons, it is not lawfull to communicate: nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther with thoſe, which come togither in houſes, auoiding the praiers of the Church muſt we pray. The like we read in the 5 Canon.<note place="margin">The Coun<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>cell of Lao<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dicea c. 9.32.33.37.</note>
               </p>
               <p>The Councell of Laodicea forbiddeth the ſame euen whan none is there preſent. And in the 33 Canon it expreſly forbiddeth to pray with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes or Skhiſmatickes, and in the Canon before, it calleth the bleſſings of heretickes, curſes. In the 37 it forbiddeth to keepe holy daies with heteticks or Iewes. how than may we go to their Churches with them on holy daies?<note place="margin">The great Laterane Councell c. 70. C. Quidane de Apoſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tis. Eccli. 2. Ex. 22.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Innocentius the third in the great Lateran Cou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cell ſaieth thus. Some, as we vnderſtand, which voluntarily haue come vnto baptiſme, doe not at all leaue the ould man, that they may putt on a new: wheras retaining the relickes of their former ceremonies or rites, they by ſuch mixture, conſou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>d the comelines of Chriſtian religion. But, wheras curſed is the man which goeth vpon the earth by two waies, and we muſt not weare a coate wouen of linnen and wollen: we ordaine that by the Pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lates
<pb n="166" facs="tcp:283:91"/>of the Churches, ſuch obſeruance of theire ould ceremonies be in any caſe repreſſed: that who<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> their owne free will did offer vnto Chriſtian religi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on, thoſe the neceſſity of holeſome coaction may retaine in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> obſeruance therof. wheras leſſe harme it is,<note place="margin">1 pet. 2<hi rend="sup">o</hi>
                  </note> not to know the way of God, than after it is knowne to go backe.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Here haue you nothing to ſay, but that by go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing to the Church you vſe no ceremony of Prote<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtants religio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, which I haue confuted aboue: ſhew<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ing that your very going &amp; preſence is a ceremony of Caluiniſme.</p>
               <p>But lett vs come vnto the example of ſo many conſtant Catholickes, as in the time of the Arrian hereſy were in greater miſery than we: but bore it with farre greater fortitude Wherein firſt there cometh vnto my minde a lawe which was made euen of going to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church, not vnlike vnto ours, of our new kind of obedience, of which becauſe it ſerueth for the perfecter deſcription of thoſe times, I will ſette downe what Sozomenus writeth.<note place="margin">L. 7. c. 13.</note>
               </p>
               <p>What Iuſtina the Empereſſe, mother vnto Va<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lentinian the younger,<note place="margin">A law a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gainſt Recu<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ſants in S. Ambroſe his time.</note> maruailouſly moleſted ho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly Ambroſe Biſhop of Millan, and yet could not preuaile to make him yeeld the Churches vnto the Arrian ſecte: ſhe growing vnto more fury, ſought to ſtrenghthen her endeuours with a law. Ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore ſending (ſaieth Sozomene) for BENIVOLVS the cheife amongſt the enroulers of the lawes,<note place="margin">A good leſion for trew gentle men.</note> ſhe commaunded him, that with all ſpeed, he ſhould make a law for confirmatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> of the faith eſtabliſhed in the Councell of Arininum (which was for y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Ar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tians.) This buſines whan he modeſtly ſought to
<pb n="167" facs="tcp:283:91"/>auoide, becauſe he fauored the catholike Church, ſhe was very importunate to entreate him, and to allure him with great promiſes of higher dignity, and yet preuailed not. For BENIVOLVS taking off his girdle, caſt it at the Empreſſes feete, ſaying;<note place="margin">The girdle was a ſigne of dignity as with vs the garter.</note> that neither his preſent, nor any greater dignity he ſo eſteemed, that he would deſire it for a reward of impiety. Whan therfore he perſiſted therin that he would neuer doe it: others were found which ſhould vndertake the ſeruice of the making of ſuch lawe This lawe commaunded that freely ſhould come togither, thoſe w<hi rend="sup">e</hi> were of the Arrian ſaith,<note place="margin">A law for going to the Church</note> and that ſuch which ſhould reſiſt vnto theſe, or at<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tempt things contrary vnto y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Emperial law, ſhould be putt to death. Thus Sozomenus of this lawe, which notwithſtanding was not executed becauſe of extraordinary calamities and troubles, which as Sozomenus writeth, made Iuſtina forget her fu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry. About that time, notably S. Ambroſe. who whan the Emperour demaunded a Church for the Arrians; Againe, ſaieth he, he ſent this meſſage:<note place="margin">Amb. l. 5. ep. 33.</note> I muſt alſo my ſelfe haue one Chrrch. But I (ſaith S. Ambroſe) anſwered:<note n="*" place="margin">He allu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth to the ſpeach of S. Ihon Bap<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tiſt vnto Herode Mat. 14.</note> It is not lawfull for thee to haue her. what haſt thou to do with an aduou<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>treſſe? For ſhe is an aduoutreſſe, which is not ioi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ned in the lawfull mariage of Chriſt.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Euen ſo doe I ſay vnto you: you may not go to the here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes Church: for what haue you to doe w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> their aduoutreſſe Sinagogue, which is not ioined in the vndefiled matrimony w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> Chriſt? This argume<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t is of the greater force, for that it is manifeſt y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> this Va<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lentinian was alwaies a catecumen, and not bapti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted at all, by reaſon of his ſuddaine death. So that
<pb n="168" facs="tcp:283:92"/>we are hereby aſſured that his onele preſence was by S. Ambroſe forbidden: wheras it is moſt cer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>taine that beeing but a Catecumen, he could not receiue any Sacrament nor ſo much as be preſent at the Churches ſacrifice: But onely at the ſinging of Pſalmes, and readings, &amp; ſermons. Thoſe ſoul<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>diers alſo which ſought by force to gett a Church for the Emperour,<note place="margin">Ibid.</note> being by him commaunded to be excommunicate: ſuddenly, God altering their mindes, came vnto the Catholicke Church where S. Ambroſe was: refuſing to be ioined with the heretickes, or for them to obtaine a Church.</p>
               <p>The ſame moſt gloriouſe Prelate in the ſame quarrell of the deliuery of the Churches to the Em<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>perour,<note place="margin">Orat. de tra dend. ba ſil.</note> for the Arrians; taketh occaſion of that parte of ſcripture, which by meere chance beeing reade that very day, in which the tumulte was at<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tempted for the Churches; very fittely he applieth vnto his purpoſe.<note place="margin">Luc. 19. Mat. 21.</note> The place was of the riding of our Sauiour vppon an Aſſe vnto Hieruſalem and caſting forth amongſt others, thoſe which ſoulde pigeons in the Temple. Where, after y<hi rend="sup">t</hi> this Saint had ſhewed his ſeruent deſire to make his owne body an hoſte and ſacrifice vnto Chriſt in ſo noble a quarrell, if it would pleaſe our Sauiour ſo to vſe the ſame his body, as he once vſed the Aſſe, whan he ſatisfied with a few of his forceable wordes, all thoſe which would haue hindered it, ſaying; that he had need of his ſeruice: he addeth this moſt no<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>table ſentence of the Doues. What are the Doues but ſimple mindes or ſoules, following the ſincere and pure faith? ſhould I than bring into y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church one whom Chriſt excludeth? for he is commaun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded
<pb n="169" facs="tcp:283:92"/>to go forth,<note place="margin">Auxe<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>tius becauſe of his wicked behauior in other pla<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ces, had changed his name</note> which will ſell the ſimple mindes of the faithfull. Therfore Auxentius is caſt forth, Mercurius is excluded. One monſter it is but two names.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>What thinke you tha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> would S. Ambroſe perſuade, if he now ſawe Auxentius in Churches? or what wold that his deuour people thinke the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſelues bou<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>d vnto, if Valentinian commaunded them there to be preſent? neither was Auxentius ſo excluded, but that if he could not haue ben excluded, euery Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke ſhould haue auoided him in the Church, more than in ciuill conuerſation: which alſo was forbidden them. Yea ſuch was the feruent zeale of this Biſhoppe in this quarrell, and ſuch was the readines of the people to cleaue vnto their Paſtour,<note place="margin">Ep. 33. l. 5.</note> in ſo iuſt a cauſe: that the Emperour him ſelfe fea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>red, leaſt by the mutany of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſouldiers (which not<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>withſtanding S. Ambroſe neuer allowed) he ſhold haue bene putt in priſon. But this Emperour, for all this, being once depriued of his euill Counſel<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lours, was alwaies after vnited vnto his Biſhopp, reputing him not only as his Father, but as his Pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tectour and deliuerer in all diſtreſſes.</p>
               <p>But in this matter of hereticall Churches,<note place="margin">Amb. orat. de obitu Vale<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>tiniani orat. de trad Baſ. How we ought to eſteeme of lawes in this point. Gal. 2.</note> heare I pray you a neceſſary leſſon of this great and moſt holy Doctour. For ſpeaking of Auxentius the Ar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rian Biſhop: he ſaieth, whome hee could not by ſpeach deceiue, thoſe he thinketh to ſtrike with y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſword. with his mouth enditing, &amp; with his hand writing bloody lawes: thinking that the law may preſcribe vnto men, a beliefe: he hath not heard, that, which euen this day was read: That a man is not iuſtified by the workes of the law. Or this: by
<pb n="170" facs="tcp:283:93"/>the law I am dead vnto the law,<note place="margin">ibid.</note> that I may liue vn<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>to God. And we therfore by the law of our Lord IESVS CHRIST, let vs dye vnto this lawe, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> enacteth decrees of perfidiouſneſſe <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Thus the moſt conſtant Paſtour, of thoſe lawes of which we ſpake before: for the deliuery of Churches vnto A<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rians. Iudge you what he thought, of going to the ſame, if the Arians had obtained their purpoſe, although in this pointe alſo, I haue ſhewed you, euen here his iudgement.</p>
               <p>A litle before that time<note n="*" place="margin">Sozom. l. 6. c. 18.</note> whan Valens in the Eaſt did perſecute the Catholickes, he came to E<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deſſa for to ſee a noble Church of S. THOMAS.<note place="margin">A notable example of Catholicks conſtancy.</note> From this citty had he either by death, or baniſh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment, or impriſonment, taken away moſt of the Catholicke Paſtours: yet whan he ſaw the Cotho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke people to gather the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſelues togither in a fielde before the citty, he is ſaid very ſharpely to haue re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>buked the Gouernour generall, and to haue ge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uen him a blowe on the eare, becauſe againſt his commaundement he ſuffered ſuch meetings to be made.<note place="margin">A ciuill he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticke.</note> Modeſtus therfore (for ſo was the Gouer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nours name although he were an Arian, yet ſecret<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly gaue them warning that they ſhould take heed, leaſt the next day they came to the ſame place to pray. For the Emperour had commaunded him, greeuouſly to puniſh thoſe which he ſhould finde there. But the people contemning his threates, w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> farre greater deſire than before, did fill the place. Which thing Modeſtus vnderſtanding, knew not what to do, yet went be into the field. In the way a woman drawing her childe after her and contra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry vnto woma<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ly decency her gowne euill fauoredly
<pb n="171" facs="tcp:283:93"/>putte about her, as it were haſting vnto a deſired thing, ruſheth through y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> band of ſoldiers w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> went before the Gouernour: who ſeeing that, co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>man<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deth her to be apprehended: and asketh her the cauſe of ſuch haſt. That I may quickly come (ſaith ſhe) vnto the field, in which the Catholickes are gathered togither. Art thou alone ignorant (ſaith Modeſtus) that the Gouernour will preſently come thither, and kill all that he findeth? Yea, ſaith the woman, I haue heard therof, and therfore I had need runne moſt ſpeedely, leaſt I come whan all is donne and ſo be depriued of Martyrdome, which now God hath offered me. But why, I pray thee, doeſt thou leade thy little boy with thee? That he alſo may be partaker of the publicke afflicton, and receaue a like reward. Therfore Modeſtus won<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dering at the manly courage of the woman retur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neth vnto the court. And whan he had informed the Emperour of her, he perſwaded him that hee ſhould ceaſe from ſeeking to accompliſh what he had begonne, wheras eſpecially it was a thing nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther of ſmall diſhonour and of greate diſcommo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dity. So farre Sozomenus. O conſtant people, O moſt kind &amp; godly mother, O happy child w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> liueſt in ſuch a time. If our times and people were like vnto theſe: than ſhould wee not onely haue more refuſers of Valens his Church, but more co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtant practiſers of their owne religio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, not able to be hindered w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> loſſe of goods, or of liberty, or of life it ſelfe. But we will go ſomewhat farther, in the worthy actes of this renoumed citty,<note place="margin">l. 4. c. 16.</note> And take that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> folowed after out of Theodoret. For notw<hi rend="sup">t</hi>ſtan<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ding the Emperour feared the multitude: yet were
<pb n="172" facs="tcp:283:94"/>thoſe w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> were of the Clergy, that is, ſome Prieſtes and Deacons (for their Biſhop Baxſes was ſent in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to baniſhment) and one Lupus worthy of ſuch a name, putt in his place, with whom that godly deuoute people refuſed to co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate) theſe Clere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gy men I ſay were brought before the Gouernour, and commaunded either to co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate with Lu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pus, or to be baniſhed. Where after a faire long tale ſaied by the Gouernour to perſwade the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> from their recuſancy,<note place="margin">A prea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ching Go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uernour.</note> alledgeing that it was an extreeme madnes, for a few ſimple men, to reſiſt one which was ſo mighty a Prince, and ouer ſo many: at the length ſaith y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Gouernor to Eulogius a holy Prieſt, and the chiefe of thoſe which was than lefte;<note n="*" place="margin">Go to that Church which your Prince go<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>eth vnto.</note> Co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate with the Emperour. Vnto whom Eu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>logius very ſtilly, but quippingly, anſwered. What, was he, whan he was made Emperour, made alſo a Biſhoppe? The Gouernour vnderſtanding the quipp, beganne to be angry, &amp; to reuile the Prieſt, and to adde theſe wordes. I ſaide not ſo focile that thou arte, but I exhorted you all to communicate with thoſe, which whom the Emperour communi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cateth. But y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> good ould man anſwered that they had a Paſtour (meaning his Biſhop,) whoſe com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maundement they ſhould in ſuch thinges obey. Wherupon fowerſcore of them were ſent into bar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>barous Countreis, into baniſhment.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>But marke I pray you both here &amp; in what ſhal be ſaid herafter,<note place="margin">vvhat is co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>munication with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes or ſchiſmaticks</note> that to co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate with hereticks, was alwaies vnderſtood by a religious and ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nious preſence at thoſe actions, wherin theire Pa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtours &amp; Biſhops exerciſed their woolfiſh profeſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on towardes their ſcattered flocke.</p>
               <pb n="173" facs="tcp:283:94"/>
               <p>And this muſt of neceſſity agree with manifeſt reaſon, that ſuch communication as is had with heretickes in their praiers, is the higheſt and moſt vnlawfull degree of communication with them. For if in auncient times, the holy Biſhopps of the Primitiue Church, by geuing or ſending of certain letters vnto Schiſmatickes or heretickes,<note place="margin">Litrae For<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>marae vel co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mmica<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>toriae. Aug. ep. 16 2. &amp; 163 Opt. l. 2. copt. parm. Conc. Mileu. c. 20</note> which were called LITTERAE, FORMATAE, or COMMVNICATO<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>RIAE, ſhould therby haue ſignified their vnion w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the ſame; &amp; therfore haue licenſed others to keepe company, and to communicate with them alſo; which they reputed alwaies vnlawfull; euer refu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſing to grant any ſuch letters, but to ſuch as were in deed Catholickes: in ſo much that S. Auguſtine writing to certaine Donatiſtes, proteſteth that he doth not ſend them communicatory, but only pri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uate letters for their conuerſion. What ſhall wee than iudge of this aſſociation in ſpirituall thinges? neither muſt you now runne vnto your ould ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cuſe ſo often by you alleaged, and by vs refuted; that you doe not communicate with them in prai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ers, whan you doe not pray your ſelfe: For your very preſence at their praiers, is a communication with their praiers: euen as the preſence at the ſame table, although you eate nothing, is a communi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cation with them in the table: and dwelling in the ſame houſe, or lying in the ſame bedd, is alwaies adiudged<note n="*" place="margin">Nauar. c. 27. n. 20.</note> a communication, expreſly forbidden by holy Canons, whan there is not that Tollerati<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on of which we ſpake before in ciuill caſes: yet ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer was nor could be graunted in the crime of their rebellion.</p>
               <p>It is very well knowen, how in auncient ages,
<pb n="174" facs="tcp:283:95"/>neither Catholickes with heretickes, nor heretickes with Catholickes would ioine Churches. Wher<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore of S. Ambroſe,<note place="margin">Amb. in or. detrad. Ba<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſil.</note> the Arians ſought a Church as we haue ſaide. Of Athanaſius, the Emperour Conſtantius demanded a Church, for the Arians: and S, Athanaſius in like manner, for the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lickes in Antioch.<note place="margin">Sozom. l. 3. c. 19</note> wheras before the Catholickes in priuate houſes did vſe to meete, refuſing to come to the Churches of heretickes: as great Athanaſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>us alſo him ſelfe, that worthy &amp; immoueable Pil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ler of Chriſtian religion did refuſe.<note place="margin">Theod. l. 5. c. 32</note> The like petiti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on was made by the Arians, in Arcadius time at Conſtantinople. which whan S. Chryſoſtome re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſiſted, &amp; ſignified before Gainas, who made ſuch motion vnto the Emperour, that the ſacred Tem<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ple was open, and that he did forbidd none, but he might pray there if he would: But I, ſaith Gai<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nas, am of an other religion, and with the men of my owne religion deſire to haue a Church.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>Theſe Arians at the day of Iudgement ſhall co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>demne our politicke Schiſmatickes.<note place="margin">The Dona<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiſtes.</note>
               </p>
               <p>Whan y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Donatiſtes had made certaine hymnes in Affrike to allure the people to theire ſeruice: S. Auguſtine, that Catholickes might in all thinges be oppoſite vnto them, made a godly Pſalme, for them to ſing,<note place="margin">Socr. l. 6. c. 8 Sozom. l. 8. c. 8.</note> which he intituled a Pſalme againſt the parte of Donatus. The Arians alſo in Conſta<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tinople, whan they by Theodoſius had bene for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bidden to vſe their ſeruice in the citty, and therfore in the night vſed to meete in publicke galleries, by ſides and quires ſinging certaine hereticall reſpon<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſes: after that the day drew neere, were wont to go from thence alſo ſinging blaſphemous ſonges
<pb n="175" facs="tcp:283:95"/>againſt y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> B. Trinity. S. Chryſoſtome therfore w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> greater ſolemnity than euer before; performed the like manner of nightly ſinging and proceſſion in his Church. and in ſhorte ſpace,<note place="margin">Solemne proceſſion was long be fore in vſe See S. Baſil. ep. 63.</note> both in number and in ſolemnity, exceeded the Arians. For in this proceſſion there went firſt a ſiluer Croſſe, w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> Tor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ches kindled and charge was committed to the Empreſſes Chamberlaine, to prouide both the ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>penſes and alſo the muſicke.</p>
               <p>So that in all antiquity we ſee, that heretickes churches and ſeruices vnto Catholicke Churches and ſeruices, haue alwaies bene as oppoſite, as Ba<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bilon vnto Hieruſalem, as heauen and hell, as the citty of God and the citty of the Deuill.</p>
               <p>The people of Alexandria choſe rather to dye.<note place="margin">Theod. l. 2. <gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="1 letter">
                        <desc>•</desc>
                     </gap>. 14.</note> than to go to the Church where an Arian Biſhop had poſſeſſion. For which cauſe S. Athanaſius him ſelfe comforted by writing, certaine Virgins to the conſtant confeſſion of their faith. For the Ari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ans hauing found the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> once at Catholicke praiers, with all manner of brutiſh cruelty, ſought to make them profeſſe Arianiſme.<note place="margin">Theod. l. 4. c. 14.</note> The people of Samoſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ta hauing loſt their godly Catholicke Biſhop Eu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſebius, were ſuch enemies of hereticall wickednes; that y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Arian Biſhop at ſeruice time was euer alone. Yea whan he had bene in the bath, ſome Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lickes comming thither, and meeting him going forth (neither would they enter whileſt he was w<hi rend="sup">t</hi>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>in) would not aduenture to waſhe them ſelues, be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore the water in which hee had waſhed was caſt forth: leaſt by the very water they ſhould haue re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceiued ſome filth of hereticall contagion. He ther<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore ſoone gaue ouer his office, and Lucius an o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther
<pb n="176" facs="tcp:283:96"/>Arian being intruded could not yet alter the mind or conſtancy of Gods Catholcike flocke, for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſaken of their Paſtour; yet as the ſame author wri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth, executing them ſelues the cae of a Paſtour, which they plainly declared by a childiſh example, but a trew patterne of feruent zeale to auncient re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ligio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. For whan this falſe Biſhop Lucius by chance rode through the market place; a company of chil<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dren there playing at ball: it happened that the ball ſlipping from one of the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, went betwene the Mules legges, on which Lucius rode. But the children cried out, thinking the ball to be polluted w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſome great filth. Wherfore hauing made a fier, paſſed the ball ofte through the flame, reputing that ſo it might be purged. This example of childiſh piety, wheras Theodoret a moſt graue Biſhop and Do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ctour, hath not thought vnworthy of his eccleſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>aſticall hiſtory: I alſo thincke it may very well be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſeeme my ſimple writings. You may, if it pleaſe you, exhort whoſoeuer will take the paines to ſup<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ply M. FOXES Martyrologe: to put this ball in y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> number of thoſe which haue ſuffered for the Goſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pell.</p>
               <p>Very notable is alſo the Recuſancy of the Ro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mane citizens,<note place="margin">Theod. l. 2. c. 10.</note> who whan Conſtantius had ſent into baniſhment their Pope Liberius, and placed Faelix y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſecond in his roome (who notw<hi rend="sup">t</hi>ſtanding afterward was a Martyr) would neuer enter into the Church, whileſt Faelix was there: both becauſe he was not their trew Paſtour, and for that he had communicated with the Arians. By which forti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tude they obtained of the Emperour the reſtoring of Liberins to his See.</p>
               <pb n="177" facs="tcp:283:96"/>
               <p>But moſt famous is the Martyrdome of S. Er<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>migildus,<note place="margin">Greg. l. 3. mor. c. 31</note> that moſt noble young Prince who for refuſing to communicate with Arians; was by the barbarous King his Father, in ſteed of his Princely inheritance crowned with a Martyrdome and ho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>noured by God after his death with moſt ſtrange miracles, and rewarded with the conuerſion of his wholle countrey.</p>
               <p>I could here very much dilate this diſcourſe, in the rehearfall of diuerſe examples of moſt conſtant Catholickes,<note place="margin">Victor vti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cenſis.</note> whom in the perſecution of the Van<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dalles in Africke hereticall ſury, made moſt glori<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe mirrours, for whoſoeuer in our age hath to contend w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the like barbarouſnes.<note place="margin">Athenage<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ras in Apol Theoph. Antioch. l. 3 ad Autol. Text. l. de ſpectac. Cypr. de ſpect.</note> A great argu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment might alſo be, brought forth of the auncient cuſtome of the pureſt age of the Church, whan it was generally holden vnlawfull for Chriſtians to be preſent at the plaies or ſpectacles of the Gentills: wherby we may iudge of the ſtrange ſpectacles w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> are in your Churches.</p>
               <p>To conclude, what worde more common in Fathers and Canons, than that it is vnlawfull to communicate with heretickes? and where ſhall we not finde that one of the cheife communications was in Churches and Ceremonies? although the very ciuill communication alſo were alwaies con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>demned but not in ſo high a degree. So that in all antiquity we may plainly perceiue, what hath bene iudged of communicating with heretickes in chur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ches and ſeruice. Yea ſo many decrees we haue of this moſt certaine truth, as there haue euer ſince Chriſt, ariſen hereſies, &amp; dew ſentences of conde<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nation, haue at any time bene geuen by Councells
<pb n="178" facs="tcp:283:97"/>or Paſtours againſt the ſame.</p>
            </div>
            <div n="40" type="section">
               <head>§. 40</head>
               <p>Lett vs now ſee what we haue in the like caſe of Schiſmatickes.<note place="margin">The pre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſcript of ho<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ly Canons concerning ſchiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes ſer<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uice.</note> Who although they be as much to be auoided as heretickes: yet for that they retaine with the ſame faith, ordinarily the ſame ceremo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nies which are in the Church: there may be in the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> a particular difficulty: And if we can in this point alſo ſhew our purpoſe, it will be vnto the matter which we handle a ſinguler aduantage.</p>
               <p>I ſay therfore that it is not lawfull, but rather a thing hauing annexed vnto it, many of thoſe de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>formities we ſpake of before, to be preſent at the ſeruice of Schiſmaticks. I meane whan they haue once deuided them ſelues, and, made a ſeuerall co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregation; or as the thirteth Canon of the Apoſtles and all auncient Fathers are wont to ſpeake, haue erected an other Aultar. For than doe I ſay, that it is an vnion with them: and therfore Schiſme, diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>obedience, and contempte of the Church: Scan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dall and danger of hereſy:<note place="margin">See §. 24.</note> Schiſme being alwaies the high way to hereſy, as we haue before expoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded. By reaſon and diſcourſe, this hath bene alrea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dy proued. But by the autority of the Church, we may aduouch it,<note place="margin">This may be deduced out of the thinges be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fore. 2. waies.</note> in two waies. Firſt, for that in the alleaged Fathers and Councells, there is often times mention made not onely of heretickes, but of Schiſmatickes alſo: as in the Antiochen and La<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>odicean Councell and others. Secondly, becauſe many heretickes haue nothing differed from the trew Catholike Church in ſeruice or Sacraments, as ordinarily happened in the Primitiue Church. Wherupon I inferre, that not the ſeruice, but the
<pb n="179" facs="tcp:283:97"/>vnion and participating with the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in their wicked<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nes,<note place="margin">Trew Sa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cramentes damnable out of the Church.</note> is by the Fathers reproued, whan they gene<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rally teach to auoide heretickes ſeruice. So doe the Fathers allow Chriſtes Sacramentes, as ſufficient, euen amongſt heretickes and ſchiſmatickes: whan there concurreth the neceſſary matter, fourme, and intention, and the conuenient miniſter.<note place="margin">l. 2. cont ep Parm. c. 13 diſt. 32. c. praeter hoc. Conc. Il<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>lerd. c 13. Sending In<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fants to Chriſte<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ning.</note> Yet doth S. Auguſtine plainly teach, that ſuch Sacraments cannot ordinarily be either geuen or taken with<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>out ſinne. Wherfore it was reputed in all ages ſo hainous a crime to cauſe a child to be chriſtned by an hereticke (although in the dew forme) that an auncient Councell made this decree. Lett not the oblation of that Catholicke in any wiſe be receiued in the Church, who ſhall offer his children to be baptiſed in hereſy.<g ref="char:leaf">❧</g>
               </p>
               <p>So doe the Fathers of the 7 generall Councell determine,<note place="margin">Act 1. 1. q. 7. c. co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ueniontibus</note> that ſuch heretickes as haue receiued holy orders by the handes of heretickes, muſt be af<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter abiuration of their hereſy, receiued vnto theire functions: but if any one of purpoſe go to an he<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>reticke, and receiue of him holy orders: him they commaund to be depoſed. What is here I pray you worthy of condemnation, but the exteriour vnion with an hereticke, the order it ſelfe beeing approued, and acknowledged by the Church? In like maner we haue an auncient Popes Canon in this forme.<note place="margin">24. q. 1. c. ſi. quis dedet it</note> If any one doe receiue the communi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on (he meaneth the trew communion of Chriſtes moſt holy body) from the hand of an hereticke, and knoweth not that the Catholike Church doth reproue it: afterward knowing it. let him doe pe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nance one yeere. If he know and neglect it, and
<pb n="180" facs="tcp:283:98"/>after repent: lett him doe penance for tenne yeeres. Other doe adiudge him ſeuen yeeres, and ſome more mildely, fiue yeeres of penance. If any man permitte an hereticke to celebrate his Maſſe in the Catholicke Church and knoweth not: lett him do Penance 40 daies. If for reuerence vnto him, a wholle yeere. If for condemnation of the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke Church, and cuſtome of the Romanes: lett him be throwen out of the Church, as an heretike except he haue Penance; and than lett him doe it tenne yeeres. If hee departe from the Catholicke Church, into the congregation of heretickes, and perſwade others,<note place="margin">Perſwading to ſciſme</note> and after repent: lett him do 12 yeeres Penance. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> If than, in hereticall rites, and ceremonies, that which is reprehended, be the co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pany, not alwaies the ceremony: Than whan we condemned with auncient Fathers the aſſociation with all heretickes, in their ſeruices: the ſame Ar<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gument and cenſure muſt be made in the commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nication with Schiſmatickes, with whom we can<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>not profeſſe any vnion, but by diſuniting our ſelues from the one onely Doue and Spouſe of Chriſt. And yet will I not ſo geue you ouer, but wee will haue ſome more expreſſe thing alſo, if it may be, for co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication with ſchiſmaticks: that you may the more be confounded, at your groſſe defending of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication with heretickes. For there is a con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fuſion, which bringeth ſinne:<note place="margin">Eccli. 4</note> and there is a con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>fuſion, which bringeth grace, and glory and ſince you haue ſhamefully entered into the one: be not I pray you, aſhamed in reſpect of ſo great reward: to abide the other.</p>
               <p>than becauſe you are ſo curiouſe an enquirer
<pb n="181" facs="tcp:283:98"/>for auncient Canons, I bring you here a Canon of an auncient Pope S. Pelagius, who next before S. Gregory gouerned the Church.</p>
               <p>This worde Schiſme (which is a greeke worde) ſaieth he, doth ſignifie diuiſion.<note place="margin">24. q. 1. c. ſchiſma.</note> But in vnity there can be no diuiſion: they therfore doe not co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>muni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cate with vnity, who co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> Schiſmaticks. They haue made to the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues partes, and ſeuering them ſelues from that which is one (that I may vſe the Apoſtle IVDE his wordes) they haue no ſpi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ritte. Wherby it is brought to paſſe, that becauſe in vnity, they are not one; becauſe they would be in parte; becauſe they haue not the ſpiritt of the bo<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>dy of Chriſt; they can haue no ſacrifice.<note place="margin">Gloſſ. ibi.</note> 
                  <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> (His meaning is becauſe ſuch ſacrifice hath no effecte, wheras the effect of the holy Euchariſt, is the vnity of Chriſtes miſticall body, from which Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes are deuided.) And diſcourſing of the great crime of thoſe which communicate with ſuch, he ſaieth. Finally, either you thinke them to be the Church, and wheras there cannot be two Chur<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ches, vs to be Schiſmatickes: or if it be manifeſt that the trew Church is in the Apoſtolicall Seas: than know you that both they are deuided from vnity, and there is now no queſtion leſte of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nication, which cannot be trew but onely in vnity.<note place="margin">Preſence at hereticall ſeruice ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>preſly for<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bidden.</note> Be you not therfore (as if there were no difference betweene Schiſmatickes, and the trew Church) in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>differently aſſociated vnto both their ſacrifices. It is not the body of Chriſt, which a Schiſmatike ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>keth, if we follow truth as our guide. Neither can any man faine, without reprouing y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Apoſtle, that Chriſt is deuided.<note place="margin">1. Cor. 1.</note> One onely is the Church which
<pb n="182" facs="tcp:283:99"/>is Chriſtes body, which cannot be deuided in two or more partes. For ſo ſoone as any departeth fro<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> her, he ceaſeth to be of any Church at all. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> How could that auncient holy Biſhop more plainly diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>courſe of communication with Schiſmaticks, euen whan they haue trew ſeruice and Sacraments? For that which he ſaieth, that a Schiſmaticke cannot make y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> body of Chriſt,<note place="margin">See y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> gloſſe vpon this place.</note> is not vnderſtood of want of trew conſecratio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> if he which taketh it vpon him bee a Prieſte: but according to the ordinary cu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtome of Doctours, which call the trew body of Chriſt, that, which is the effect of the holy Eucha<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riſt, which is the incorporation with Chriſtes miſti<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>call body, which a Schiſmaticke cannot make in a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny: or becauſe a Schiſmaticke him ſelfe is no parte of that miſticall body: ſo that he ſpeaketh not of conſecration of the Euchariſt, but of the vnion of him which is the conſecratour.</p>
               <p>S. Auguſtine diſputing againſt the Donatiſtes,<note place="margin">S. Augu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtines opi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion. l. 1. de Bap. cont. Do<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nat. c. 2. 24. q. 1. cap. Si quem forte</note> hath this notable ſaying, which I will ſette downe the more largely, that you may ſee how that great Sainte, and moſt graue Doctour of Gods Church, eſteemed of this exteriour ſhew of vnion with the trew Church of God, which wee defend. If per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>happs (ſaieth hee) extreame neceſſity driueth any man where he cannot finde a Catholicke: &amp; kee<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ping in his mind Catholicke peace, he doe receaue by ſome other, which is out of the Catholicke vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty, that which he would haue receaued in Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke vnity (he meaneth baptiſme:) if forthwith he depart out of this world: we doe not repute him but as a Catholicke. And if he be deliuered from corporall death: whan he ſhall yeeld him ſelfe vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>to
<pb n="183" facs="tcp:283:99"/>the Catholicke congregation, euen with his cor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>porall preſence, from whence he neuer departed in his hart: not onely, we do not diſallowe, that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> he hath donne; but with all ſecurity and verity we co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mend him: becauſe he beleeued that God was preſent in hjis harte, where hee obſerued vnity, and would not departe out of this life, without the Sa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>crame<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t of Baptiſme, which whenſoever he found, he knew to be Gods and not of men. But if any, whan he might receiue it in the Catholike Church through any peruerſnes of mind doth chooſe to be baptiſed in Schiſme: although afterward he come vnto the Catholicke Church, where certaine it is y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> the Sacrament profiteth, which may trewly be o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>therwhere receiued, but not profitt: he is peruerſe and wicked, and ſo much the more perniciouſly,<note place="margin">How a man in ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceſſity may receaue a ſacrament of an here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tike or ſchiſ<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>maticke.</note> by how much the more wittingly. S Auguſtine ſpeaketh here of Schiſmatickes. Where he repre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>hendeth not the ſeruice or Sacrament, but the vni<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>on which is by the outward ſhew profeſſed. Nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther yet was it his mind to approue ſuch commu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nicatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> with Schiſmatickes in neceſſity, that a man may diſſemble his recourſe vnto them, for to be in ſigne of vnion vnto them: but he ſpeaketh of thoſe which were publicke Catecumens in the Church,<note place="margin">Conc. Trid ſeſſ. 14. Caiet. ver<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bo. Abſolu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tio cap. Pa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtoralis de off. iud. ord. Anglez de. Conr. Art. 8. Diffic. 9.</note> and knowne to deſire y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Churches Sacrament, and as he ſaieth, of the Church already in hart: which in their extremity could finde no Catholicke who might actually incorporate them to the ſame. Af<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ter which maner, in extreeme neceſſity there wan<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ting an other Prieſt: at the houre of death, any Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke may lawfully, and ſufficiently, be abſol<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ued by any trew Prieſt, although an hereticke, yea
<pb n="184" facs="tcp:283:100"/>by Luther him ſelfe, if he were aliue: So that nei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther the Prieſt want dew intention, &amp; the Penitent make knowne, both vnto the Prieſt, and others, who might otherwiſe be ſcandalized, that he wold liue and dye in the Catholicke vnity.</p>
               <p>This is a pointe very good for our countreymen to know, as a thing which may happen vnto them to be as profitable: as it is moſt certainly permitted by holye Church: So that it be not according to the forme of the communion booke, or with diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſimulation. and dew diligence be vſed, for to find a Catholicke Prieſt.</p>
               <p>But of S. Auguſtines opinion in this pointe, out of whom this Canon was taken, we can ſay much more. And if we would ſay all, we ſhould exceed any reaſonable volume. But our intent is not to bring here the ſentences of holy Fathers, but in as much as either they ſhew y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> cuſtome of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church, or haue theire graue ſentences for the gouernment of the wholle Church, placed in the body of the Canon lawes. This glorious Piller of Chriſte<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>dome liuing in Affrica, amongſt the ſwarmes of Dona<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tiſtes, which at that time moleſted the Church of Chriſt, being firſt onely Schiſmatickes, but after<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward growing to expreſſe hereſy, as alwaies Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes, if they continew vſe to doe, as we haue new oftentimes ſaied out of S. Hierome: in all his workes againſt Donatiſtes geueth moſt plaine te<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtimony of the cuſtome of his daies.<note place="margin">Going to the Church is ſchiſme in <hi>S.</hi> Agu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtines opi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nion.</note> For whoſoe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer ſhal read any of thoſe learned bookes which he writeth of that Schiſme: ſhall ſee, that neither the Donatiſtes with the Catholickes, nor theſe with them would any waies communicate. Yea by this
<pb n="185" facs="tcp:283:100"/>great Father, it was reputed Schiſme, for the one parte to communicate with the other in ſpirituall thinges: which whan I ſay, I meane the religious preſence at ſeruice.</p>
               <p>Heare, I pray you, what this Saint rehearſeth of an Imperiall law againſt this action<note n="*" place="margin">Ciuill law See cod de hereticis L. quicun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>que l. 1. cont ep. Parm. in fine See ep. 166. Although the conuen<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ticles, are ſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerall, and the ſegre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation wic<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ked: yet the law cannot coueniently puniſh all. proper con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uenticles wicked ſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>peration congrega<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted.</note> Of the other Emperours lawes and iuſtice, (except of Iulian the Apoſtata, who only fauoured the Donatiſtes, per<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mitting them to haue Churches) which lawes are moſt vehement againſt them: who is ignorant? Amongſt the which, one generall law againſt all ſuch as will be called Chriſtians, and do not com<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municate with the Catholike Church, but are ga<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thered together ſeuerally in their proper co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>uenticles conteineth thus much: that as well be who ordei<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neth a clergy man, as alſo he which is ordeined, be amerced in tenne Poundes of golde. But that the very place where the wicked ſeparation is congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gated, be confiſcated. There be alſo other gene<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>rall commaundemements, by which they are diſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bled either to make will or donations, or to receiue any thing by any wills or donations. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Thus S. Auguſtine. Where you may obſerue the cauſe of ſuch puniſhment, onely to be the gathering togi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther into ſeuerall co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>uenticles, which he calleth wic<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ked ſeparations, and the not communicating with the Catholicke Church. So that in S. Auguſtines iudgement, you may ſee, that it is all one, to be ga<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>thered in Caluins wicked ſeparation, and not to communicate with the Catholicke vnity: which I pray you, what is it elſe but to be in Schiſme?<note place="margin">l. 1. de bapt. cont. Don. c. 4.</note>
               </p>
               <p>More plainly he calleth thoſe which receiue Bap<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>tiſme in the Donatiſtes congregation, with an in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tent
<pb n="186" facs="tcp:283:101"/>after their Baptiſme preſently to come to the Catholicke Church:<note place="margin">Schiſma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes.</note> Such I ſay he calleth Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes: not diſallowing the Sacrament, but the receiuing of it in that Church, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> maketh ſchiſme. What need is it (ſaieth he) to committ this accurſed euill, euen but one day or one houre? For whoſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>euer deſireth this to be graunted him, may either of the Church, or of God demaund, that it may be lawfull for him, but for one day to be an Apoſta<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ta. For there is no cauſe why he ſhould feare to be an Apoſtata for one day, and not feare to bee a Schiſmaticke or Hereticke for one day. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> See how he accounteth y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> receiuing of the holy Sacra<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of Baptiſme of an Hereticke, although with intent of coming to the Catholicke Church after<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ward, to be Schiſme: and the perſiſting after in ſuch congregatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, to continew the ſchiſme. Thus much he ſaieth of ſuch as know the Donatiſtes not to be the trew Church. In the next chapter: But they which through ignorance are there baptiſed,<note place="margin">c. 5.</note> thinking, that to be the Church of Chriſt: in co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pariſon of the former, doe indeed ſinne leſſe: yet are they greeuouſly wounded with the ſacriledge of Schiſme.<note place="margin">Wounded with the ſa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>criledge of ſchiſme.</note> 
                  <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> He expoundeth him ſelfe after<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wards becauſe their ignorance cannot be excuſed. Than is it Schiſme to receaue a moſt holy &amp; trew Sacrame<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t of a Schiſmaticke. Why I pray you? not becauſe<note n="*" place="margin">ibid. c. 2.</note> they receiue baptiſme, but becauſe they receiue it in Schiſmatickes Churches. therfore the being in Schiſmatickes Church, as one of their ſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ciety, is Schiſme. The like hee hath in the ſame booke.<note n="*" place="margin">c. 8</note> Thoſe whome they Baptize, they cure of the wound of Idolatry and Infidellity, but more
<pb n="187" facs="tcp:283:101"/>greeuouſly they do ſtrike w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the wound of ſchiſme.<note place="margin">Schiſme by S. Augu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtine, is more gree<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uous than Idolatry.</note> For Idolaters amongſt y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> people of God the ſword deſtroied, but the Schiſmatickes the earth opening ſwallowed. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Behould, what account this holy Doctour maketh of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> company of ſchiſmaticks in their Churches: not becauſe the thing donne, w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> is the adminiſtration of Gods moſt pure Sacrament, is euill; for he alwaies honourerh it: nor becauſe of the ſinne of the miniſter, vr worthely exerciſing his function; for ſuch ſinne is moſt often committed euen in the Catholicke Church, and cannot defile the worthy receiuour: nor becauſe of the euill, or falſe beliefe, or ſchiſmaticall mind, of the receiuer; for he ſuppoſeth the contrary: but onely for that aſſociation which is had in a Schiſmaticall congre<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gation with the ſame, and is not onely committed in the acte of the Sacrament there receiued, but e<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer after by remaining amongſt the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> is continewed.</p>
               <p>The ſame Doctour where he intreateth againſt Emeritus a Danation Biſhop: Of ſuch as were of the parte of Donatus in harte but yelded to the Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholickes their corporall preſence, ſaieth: that they are CARNE INTVS, SPIRITV FORIS. Tha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> is it al<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſo a cleare caſe, that the very corporall preſence in Caluins parte, maketh one to be CARNE INTVS, SPIRITV FORIS, that is in fleſhe within Caluins Church, in ſpirit without. and becauſe, as we ſaid aboue, none can be of Gods Church deuided,<note place="margin">See §. 24.</note> but he muſt be wholly of the ſame: what remaineth, but that ſuch are to be eſteemed of Caluins,<note place="margin">S. Gregory l. 1. ep. 36.</note> &amp; not of Chriſt his Church?</p>
               <p>Of S. Gregories time, we haue moſt euident te<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtimony. Who not onely ſtrictly forbiddeth that
<pb n="188" facs="tcp:283:102"/>any perſon permitte his children, bondſlaues, or any belonging to his iurisdiction, to be baptized by the Donatiſtes: But whan the Inhabitants of a certaine Iland called Caprea,<note place="margin">L. 7. ep. 99.</note> returned fro<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſchiſme, ſending their Embaſſadours to Rome for their re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>conciliation; he gaue order, that if theire fitſt Biſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhop would be alſo reconciled to the vnity of gods Church, he ſhould remaine their Biſhopp: other<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wiſe that a new ſhould be made, that our Lords flocke (ſaieth he) may be ſecure againſt the dartes of the deceitfull enemy. Which great care (conſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dering the tumultes &amp; inconueniences which hap<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pen, where two ſeuerall Biſhops do ſitt) had bene in vaine, if that people might haue receiued theire ſpirituall things of their olde Schiſmaticall Biſhop. Neither is there any cauſe herof, but the exteriour ſhew of vnion in his congregation, wheras the dif<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ference in doctrine, ſeruice, and Sacraments, was none at all.</p>
               <p>Whoſoeuer readeth ouer the hiſtories of ſuch Schiſmes as haue bene heretofore in the Romane Church, whan there hath bene diuiſion of Popes (although y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Romane Church was neuer deuided, but all deuiders haue preſently ceaſſed to be of this Church he ſhall finde this doctrine of auoiding Schiſmaticks moſt co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ſtantly on both ſides to haue bene obſerued. For as the Schiſmatickes did arro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gate vnto the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues the name of the trew Church: ſo did they alſo alwaies paint them ſelues with the ſhew of whatſoeuer piety the trew Church ſhould profeſſe.<note place="margin">L. 6. vitae. Sancti Bern c. 6.</note> In the time of that greate Schiſme be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tweene Innocentius the ſecond and Peter Lyon; S. Bernard a moſt carneſt defendour of the trew Pa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtour
<pb n="189" facs="tcp:283:102"/>of the Church, at POITIERS, before that Church had publickely ſhewed it ſelfe to be Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticall, had offered vnto God in the Cathedrall Church the immaculate Sacrifice. But after his de parture the Deane of the ſame Church broke very impiouſly, but not ſcotfree, y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Aultar in which the holy man had celleorated: for after a very ſhorte time he died moſt deſperatly. And whan y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Prince of that countrey of A quitane, who had oppoſed him ſelfe to Innocentius came to parley with S. Ber<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>nard: after much debating of the matter, S Ber<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nard gotte him ſelfe vnto y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> moſt effectuall armour of the Diuine miſteries. When y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Prince him ſelfe was not permitted to enter into the Church: but by the Diuine autority of the Saint, adiuring hun in the preſence of Chriſtes body, which vpon the ſacred Patene he caried forth of the Church vnto him; was at the length mollified, and of a wolfe,<note place="margin">S. william D. of Aqui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tane.</note> became a lambe; and of a SAVLE, a PAVLE; and of a notorious ſinner, a glorious Sainte, and patterne of trew repentance, for nouriſhing the di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uiſion of the Church.</p>
               <p>Than doe we euidently ſee that on both ſides this hath alwaies bene an inuiolable cuſtome, that aſwell the Schiſmaticke hath auoided the Catho<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>licke, as the Catholicke hath ſhunned the ſpiritu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>all communication with the Schiſmaticke.</p>
               <p>But the example &amp; autority of S Cyprians time ſhall both determine and finiſh this controuerſie.<note place="margin">S. Cyprian.</note> Againſt whome when Feliciſſimus had raiſed a Schiſme, and gathered togither in a certaine bid ſo many as he could, vſing therunto the terrour of ſe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>culer Magiſtrates, and diuerſe threatnings: S. Cy<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>prian
<pb n="190" facs="tcp:283:103"/>ſent into thoſe partes two Biſhops &amp; as ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ny Prieſtes, to hinder the poorer ſorte, leaſt for po<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uerty they ſhould be drawen vnto Feliciſſimus his parte.<note place="margin">ep. 40.</note> Let none (ſaith he) draw you Chriſtians fro<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> the Goſpell of Chriſt: let none take away out of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church, the children of the Church: Let ſuch pe<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>riſh alone by them ſelues, who will needes periſh: Let them alone remaine out of the Church, who are gone out of the Church. And after. But if any ſhall go vnto the parte of Feliciſſimus, or his Cha<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pions, &amp; ioine him ſelfe vnto that heretical faction: let him know that he ca<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>not afterward returne vnto the Church, and communicate with the Biſhopp and flocke of Chriſt.<note place="margin">ep. 38.</note> 
                  <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> And of the ſame. whoſo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>euer ſhall ioine him ſelfe vnto his conſpiracy and faction, let him know that he cannot co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>municate with vs in the Church, who voluntarily choſe to be ſeparated from the Church. Theſe my letters doe you reade vnto our Brethren, and ſend them alſo to the Clergy at Carthage, adding alſo the names of whoſoeuer haue ioined them ſelues to Feliciſſi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mus. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> The like cenſure to haue bene made of ſuch as ioined them ſelues in Churches vnto Noua<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tianus a falſe Pope againſt S. Cornelius:<note place="margin">S. Cornelius</note> out of S. Cvprians epiſtles; and that which S. Cornelius him ſelfe wrote vnto Fabius the Biſhop of Antioch,<note place="margin">ep. 52 l. 6. c. 35</note> w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> Euſebius ſetteth downe at large; we may manifeſt<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly perceiue, where it is alſo plainly to be ſeene, that this externall vnion in ſeruice and Sacraments, is the very nature and eſſence of ſchiſme. For as S. Cor<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nelius writeth, whan the followers of Nouatianus came at his Maſſe to receaue, hee houlding theire handes betweene his owne, exacted of them this
<pb n="191" facs="tcp:283:103"/>othe: Sweare vnto me by the body and blood of our Lord Ieſus Chriſt, that thou wilte neuer either forſake me or returne vnto Cornelius. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> See than that the ſchiſme is not only in receauing ſacrame<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ts, but in not forſaking the ſchiſmaticall congregatio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. Which whan diuerſe afterwards did, than did they returne vnto y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church: So ſaith Cornelius. Know thou, that euery day now the brethre<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> forſake him, and returne vnto the Church, and that now he is deſtitute and depriued almoſt of the ſociety of the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> all. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Beholde, I pray you, that to come into y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Catholicke Church is to forſake ſchiſmaticall ſocie<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ty. Thouſandes of the like examples and autori<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ties might be brought:<note place="margin">l. de vnitat<gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="2 letters">
                        <desc>••</desc>
                     </gap> Eccl. in fine. Three ma<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ners of co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                     <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>municating with here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes or ſchiſmatiks.</note> but I will conclude with a diſtinction of S. Auguſtine, who maketh three de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>grees of communicating with Hreretickes or Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>matickes. The firſt, of ſuch as communicate with them whan they haue not plainly ſhewed their re<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>bellion againſt the wholle Church: And theſe not with ſtanding their co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>munication, he calleth pure and vncorrupted wheat. Others, as this Doctour ſpeaketh although hauing a goodwil, yet through fleſhly darkenes doe wander w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> a while, whan theire ſchiſme is manifeſt: And theſe he accoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>teth as wheate, whoſe blade is trodden downe and withered, the roote remaining aliue: and neuer to grow againe but by Gods mercifull correction. Fi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nally others, with an euill mind and purpoſe do co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tradict the moſt open truth: theſe are altogither pulled vpp by the rootes, neither can be planted a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gaine, but by him, who onely is able to grafte a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gaine the broken boughes in their naturall ſtocke.<note place="margin">Rom. 11</note> So that according to S. Auguſtines doctrine, we
<pb n="192" facs="tcp:283:104"/>may learne what is to be iudged of our fearful Schiſmatickes.<note place="margin">THE CO<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>CLV<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>SION.</note>
               </p>
               <p>But it is now time at the length to drawe to an end of our wholle diſputation. Wherin if I haue bene ſomewhat bould with your ſelfe: I pray you impute it to the ſincerity of my good will, and the familiarity of our frendſhip. If I may ſeeme to be ouer vehement, &amp; incenſed againſt others: I name none: If any ones conſcience doe accuſe him, lett him either amend him ſelfe, or not there deuiſe a quarrell where none is meant. If either by you, or other Catholickes, I may be iudged to haue geuen ſome occaſion by plaine and trew ſpeaches, to ex<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>aſperate heretickes:<note place="margin">2. Cor. 12.</note> I aunſwere with S. PAVL: I am become fooliſh, you haue compelled me. So long as the ſheepe of Chriſt his fould do obedient<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ly &amp; ſimply harken vnto the voice of the Paſtours, and chooſe to be guided by the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, refuſing to heare ſtrangers: ſo long may the Shepheard be quiett &amp; ſtill. But if once the falſe ſhepheardes be entered into the fould, or rather expreſſe wolues, who doe take away and ſcatter the ſheepe: than is it time for the Shepheard, not onely him ſelfe, to ſtirre a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>broade; but to ſend out his dogges, and to vſe all poſſible remedies, againſt ſo preſent dangers. I do not take vpon me to haue ſaide more, than hath bene ſaide hertofore, onely I haue ſought to preſſe you with that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> moſt learnedly hath ben brought by others, whoſe writings being almoſt worne out of mind, the effect of them ſeemeth to be as little regarded.</p>
               <p>Reme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ber I pray you,<note place="margin">Gal. <gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="1 letter">
                        <desc>•</desc>
                     </gap>.</note> that ſaving of S PAVL, &amp; apply it vnto your ſelfe If I build y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> ſame things
<pb n="193" facs="tcp:283:104"/>againe which I haue deſtroied: I make my ſelfe a Preuaricatour. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> How odiouſe the name of a Preuaricatour is, you know very well. A Preuari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>catour,<note place="margin">2. q. 3. c. fi quem. Vlpianus ibi citatus.</note> (ſaith the Ciuilian) is ſaid, as it were a vari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>catour (a ſtradler, of whoſe legges you ca<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>not know the right from the leafte) which helpeth the con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>trary parte, and betraieth his owne. You will not be offended, I hope, if I tell you that which truely I may: that whileſt you go about to build vpp the rebellious walles of Schiſme, which once in your ſelfe and others you deſtroied: you make your ſelfe a Preuaricatour. For doe you not perceiue, how you helpe the aduerſe parte? Do you not ſee how you betray your owne cauſe? I meane that cauſe, which once you made your owne, although now you haue forſaken it, you haue betraied it, yea you haue not onely now by ſecrett colluſion impugned it, but by open hoſtility taken vpon you the patro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nage of your aduerſaries cauſe againſt it. He that gathereth not with me ſcattereth, ſaieth our Saui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>our.<note place="margin">Mat. 1<gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="1 letter">
                        <desc>•</desc>
                     </gap>.</note> You gather vnto Satans congregation: than can you not gather with Chriſt, but ſcatter againſt Chriſt. Or rather I may ſay of you,<note place="margin">c. 17.</note> that w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> Hiere<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>my the Prophett long ſince foreſaw of the Deuill, and whoſoeuer is his inſtrument, in fauouriug of hereſies. The Partrich hath cheriſhed (or gathered togither, as S. Auguſtin readeth) thoſe w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſhe hath not brought forth: She hath made riches,<note place="margin">L. de paſte c. 12.</note> and not in iudgement: in the middeſt of her daies ſhe ſhall leaue them, and at her latter end ſhe ſhall be vn<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>wiſe. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> The Deuill whom S. Auguſtine vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtandeth by the Partrich, or, as that Doctour alſo faieth, any Heretike, Brother Coadiutor, or ſonne
<pb n="194" facs="tcp:283:105"/>of the Deuill, (for theſe names doth this gloriouſe Sainte attribute vnto theſe contentiouſer Rebells, therfore wel likened vnto Partriches, who with ſtri<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uing are the ſooner taken:) Theſe Partriches I ſay, gather togither thoſe, who<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> they haue not brought forth: thoſe, whom Almighty God hath created, and the holy Church brought forth vnto grace, &amp; vnto her bleſſed vnity. Theſe Partriches haue en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>creaſed their congregation with riches, but not in iudgement. For as the Deuill careth not, of what hereſy one be of, ſo he be an hereticke: So hath he without any iudgement or diſcretion, gathered a<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mongſt heretickes, ſuch as he careth not whether they be heretickes or no, ſo that they be in his con<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gregation: ſo that they be without: ſo that they be in a parte: wheras Chriſtes garment can haue no parte, nor any way be deuided. The Deuell ſaieth not (that I may vſe the ſpeach of S. Auguſtine) theſe are Donatiſtes, and not Arians: whether theſe, or thoſe: they belong vnto him, which gathereth togither without iudgement. Let him worſhipp the Idolls (ſaieth he) he is mine. Lett him remaine in the ſuperſtition of the Iewes: he is mine hauing forſaken vnity, let him go vnto this hereſy, or that hereſy: he is mine. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Yea as we haue ſhewed be fore lett him but be gathered togither with Here<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tickes at their ſeruice:<note place="margin">It is a ſigne of hereſy, to require Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholickes to come to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church. Ezech. 34</note> he is mine. The Deuill then, and whoſoeuer gathereth with him, and againſt Chriſt; gathereth his riches, but without iudgme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>t: farre contrary vnto the Catholicke Church which deteſteth all others, and gathereth none but ſuch as deſire earneſtlye to be her children, and to bee the ſheepe of him, who ſaide I will feed the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> in iudge<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment.
<pb n="195" facs="tcp:283:105"/>But in the middeſt of her daies Shee ſhall leaue them: (ſaith the Prophet either, becauſe God will mightely raiſe vp the lapſed againe. or becauſe according to that ſaying of S. PAVL, I would to God thoſe were curt off which doe diſturbe you: the fauourers of ſuch ſchiſme ſhall at y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> length diſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>couer the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues; &amp; by open Apoſtaſy ſhewe what they ſecretly harboured within their rebellious bo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſomes; and forſaking thoſe whom they pretending to feed did deuoure; verify in them ſelues, the ſay<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ing of the Apoſtle: They went out from vs, but they were not of vs. or elſe, becauſe God will ſud<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dainly puniſh, and take out of this life ſuch deui<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded members, and wandering ſheepe to their eter<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nall confuſion. whan at the laſt ſuch Diabolicall endeuours ſhall ſhew the folly of their authors, &amp; all the faire promiſes, and floriſhing perſwaſions of Schiſmaticall rebellion, ſhall diſcloſe and diſco<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer them ſelues, as fooliſh deuiſes.</p>
               <p>And I would to God the diuerſe puniſhments which are daily inflicted vpon the lapſed, were ſuf<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ficiently knowen vnto the worlde.<note place="margin">Three kindes of puniſhme<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ts of Schiſme. Ser de lapſ.</note> wheras we ſee now in our age, no leſſe miraculous ſcourges for this ſhamefull lapſe, than we read in S. Cyprian of thoſe, which in his age fell into Idolatry. So many ſchiſmaticall mariages, ſuddainly turned into mour<g ref="char:EOLunhyphen"/>ning: ſo many conformable men, either poſſeſſed or diſtracted, or puniſhed with the death of their neereſt allies: So dreadfull torments of conſcience, and cominuall terrours, as they worthely are affli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cted withall; whom God with Caine hath caſt out of his holy ſight, &amp; leſte as vacabonds and forlorne of the earth: Such ſuddaine deathes of Infants,
<pb n="196" facs="tcp:283:106"/>baptized by heretickes: no otherwiſe than hapned to the ſonne of Valens the Emperour,<note place="margin">Theod. l. 4. c. 17.</note> for admit<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ting the curſed bleſſing and baptiſme of the Ari<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ans, after S. Baſils ſacred preſence, and infinite o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther like wonders. To which effect I remember what Tertullian writeth of a farre inferiour kinde of iniquity,<note place="margin">L. de ſpect. c. 26.</note> than preſence at hereticall ſeruice, that is of preſence at the Gentills ſpectacles: of which we ſpake before. There happened, ſaieth he, an example in a woman teſtifying Gods indignation. This woman going vnto the Theater, returned with a Deuill: wherfore whan in the exorciſme the vncleane ſpiritt was rebuked becauſe he durſt mo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>leſt a Chriſtian: the Deuill anſwered very bouldly: I did it moſte worthely: for I founde her in my owne. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> Take you heed therfore that the Deuill find you no more in his owne.</p>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="2"/> Neither is this the onely puniſhment of ſo great a treaſon, wheras y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> very infamy of the world doth follow it, as dew vnto forſakers of their tender mo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther: ſetters to ſale of their owne conſciences: in<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>conſtant reedes &amp; wauering perſons, both towards God and alſo towardes men.<note place="margin">Euſ. l. 1. vit con. c. 11. Sozom. l. 1. c. 4.</note> For moſt worthy was that iudgement of Conſtantius the Emperour Father vnto the great Conſtantine, who deſirous to make triall of Chriſtian fortitude, gaue out an edicte y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> whoſoeuer refuſed to ſacrifice to his Gods, ſhould be baniſhed the courte Wherupon ſome, which impiouſly yeelded, were baniſhed: and the other, which remained conſtant, with ſinguler fa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uour were retained. For that wiſe Emperour, well conſidered that who would be trecherous to God, could not be trew to him,</p>
               <pb n="197" facs="tcp:283:106"/>
               <p>
                  <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="3"/> But the greateſt puniſhment of all, is the being forſaken or God, &amp; downefall into all ſinne. For as Sampſon after his familiarity with Dalila,<note place="margin">Iudic. 16. Dalila</note> loſt his former ſtrength: and falling into his enemies handes, was depriued of his ſight: and bound in chaines, was made euer after to grind in the mill. So after the entry into the hereticall conuenticle, a moſt falſe and deceitfull Dalila, who ſeeth not, y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> the mind being blinded, betaketh it ſelfe to the bo<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>
                  <g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>dage of all manner of iniquitye, where, euen as it were in a wheele, it runneth an vnlimited race, ne<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uer ceaſing to go from one wickednes to an other.<note place="margin">L. 25. mor. c. 12.</note> For by the deſerte of ſo great a ſinne, the pitt of o<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ther ſinnes is couered (as S. Gregory notably tea<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>cheth) that he which wittingly co<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>mitteth one euill, euen in other thinges may iuſtly vnwitting periſh.<note n="*" place="margin">One ſinne is puniſh<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ment of an other. Rom. 1. 1. Theſſ. 2. Ap. 22.</note> For this is therfore donne, that ſinnes may be pu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>niſhed w<hi rend="sup">t</hi> ſinnes, to the end, that the very increaſe of vices, may be the puniſhment of the offendours. Hence, doth the Apoſtle ſay, that God hath deli<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uered certaine vnto the deſires of their hart. And againe: that they may fill vp their ſinnes alwaies. Hence, by an Angells voice is it ſaid vnto IOHN, who hurteth, let him hurt yet; and who is in filthi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>neſſe, let him be filthy yet. Hence DAVID ſaith: Lay iniquity vpon their iniquity,<note place="margin">pſal. 68.</note> that they may not enter into thy iuſtice. Hence againe, by the ſaide Pſalmiſt it is ſaide of our Lord him ſelfe:<note place="margin">Pſal. 77.</note> He hath made the ſuggeſtions of malignant ſpirits, to be the way vnto the path of his wrath. For to make that which was but a path of his wrath, to become a broad way, is by his diſtrict iudgement, to enlarge the cauſes of wrath, that thoſe which being illumi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>nated
<pb n="198" facs="tcp:283:107"/>would not doe well, being iuſtlye blinded, ſhould farther doe, wherby they may deſerue the more to be puniſhed. <g ref="char:leaf">❧</g> God graunt that you may open your eies at the length, and find the way of the citty of Cods habitation, leaſt in the day of his reuenge, from this wilfull darkeneſſe which you haue incurred,<note place="margin">Pſal. 106</note> you be againſt your will throwen into the vtter darkeneſſe. From which God of his mercy, and by the interceſſion of his bleſſed mother deliuer you.</p>
               <closer>
                  <signed>He which deſireth nothing more, than that our frendſhip may through Ca<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tholicke vnity be perpetuall.</signed>
               </closer>
            </div>
            <div type="epigraph">
               <q>
                  <bibl>S. Cypr. lib. de vnit. Eccl.</bibl>
                  <p>
                     <milestone type="tcpmilestone" unit="unspecified" n="1"/> What peace doe the enemies of the brethren pro<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>miſe vnto the<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g> ſelues? do they thinke that Chriſt is with them, whan they are gathered togither, which are gathered togither out of the Church? Such although they be killed for the confeſſion of Chriſts name: yet this blotte cannot be wa<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſhed away euen with blood.</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>S. Ambroſe vpon the 9. chapter of the Apo<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>calipſe, comparing the heares of the cater<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>pillers vnto the hereticall Churches: ſaith.</bibl>
                  <p>The Locuſts had heares of wome<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>. for as y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Saincts of the Church of God had theire flockes which at certaine times did come togither to celebrate y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> di<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uine ſeruices: So alſo heretickes had theire madde
<pb n="199" facs="tcp:283:107"/>and furiouſe people, which in diuerſe places came togither, to the celebration not of diuine miſteries, but of deueliſh ſeruices.</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>The ſame Father, vpon thoſe wordes of the Goſpell of S. Luke the 9. chapter: whan y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> vncleane ſpirit ſhall depart out of a man.</bibl>
                  <p>This, it cannot be doubted, but that it is ſpoken of the people of the Iewes: which our Lord before did ſeuer from his kingdome. Wherfore vnder<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ſtand thou alſo, that all hereticks and ſchiſmaticks are ſeparated from the kingdome of God, &amp; from y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Church. And therfore it is moſt manifeſt, that the meetings of heretickes and Schiſmatickes, be<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>long not to God, but to the vncleane ſpirit.</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>S. Cyprian in his 40. epiſtle, euen of Schiſ<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>maticall Churches, ſpeaketh thus.</bibl>
                  <p>There is but one God, and one Chriſt, and one Church, and one chaire by our Lords voice ſoun<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ded vpon Peter. There cannot be erected an other aultar, nor made another Prieſthood, beſides one aultar, &amp; one Prieſthood. whoſoeuer otherwhere gathereth, ſcattereth. it is aduouterouſe, it is impi<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ouſe, it is ſacrilegiouſe, whatſoeuer by humane fu<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ry is decreed, that Gods diſpoſition may be viola<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ted. Departe you farre from the contagion of ſuch men, and euen as if you would auoide a canker or peſtilence, ſhunne their ſpeaches.</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>In the ſame epiſtle hee geueth warning to auoid deceitfull teachers. ſuch as are now a daies thoſe w<hi rend="sup">c</hi> teach to go to heretiks churches.</bibl>
                  <p>Flee the wolues, which ſeparate the ſheepe from the Paſtour: flee the venemous tongue of the De<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uell who from y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> begining of the world alwaies de<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>ceitfull
<pb n="200" facs="tcp:283:108"/>and falſe, lyeth, that he may deceaue: <gap reason="illegible" resp="#OXF" extent="3 letters">
                        <desc>•••</desc>
                     </gap>at<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>tereth, that he may hurt: promiſeth good, that he may cauſe euell: offereth life, y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> he may kill. Now alſo do his wordes cleerely ſhew them ſelues; and his poiſons are manifeſt: he promiſeth peace, that none may come to peace: he promiſeth ſaluation, that he which hath offended may nor come to ſal<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>uation: he promiſeth the Church, wheras he en<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>deuoureth, that who beleeueth him, may vtterly periſh from the Church.</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>The ſame in his 77. epiſtle.</bibl>
                  <p>Our Lord inſinuating vnto vs vnity defineth and ſaieth: I and my Father am one. vnto which vnity he bringing his Church, ſaieth againe: And there ſhalbe one flocke, and one ſhepheard. if than the flocke be one, how can he be of the flocke, which is not amongſt the number of the flocke?</p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>Againe libro de lapſis in fine.</bibl>
                  <p>Such maner of men (he ſpeaketh of Schiſmaticks) do you auoid as much as you may. theire ſpeach ſpreadeth as a canker, their take paſſeth abroad as a contagion, their hurtfull &amp; venemous perſuaſio<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>, killeth worſe than the perſecution it ſelfe.<note place="margin">Gen 4. Apoc. 2.</note>
                  </p>
               </q>
               <q>
                  <bibl>S. Hierome ep. 11. de Monogamia.</bibl>
                  <p>Let one Eue be the mother of a<g ref="char:cmbAbbrStroke">̄</g>ll the liuing: &amp; one Church the mother of all Chriſtians. as curſed La<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>mech deuided y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> firſt into two citties: ſo heretickes teare this into many Churches W<hi rend="sup">c</hi> according to y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Apocalipſe of S. IHON, are rather to be called Sina<g ref="char:EOLhyphen"/>gogues of y<hi rend="sup">e</hi> Deuell, than congregations of Chriſt.</p>
               </q>
               <closer>Laus Deo, ac Beatiſſimae ſemper Virgini Matri Deiparae MARLAE atꝙ omnibus Sanctis.</closer>
               <trailer>FINIS.</trailer>
               <pb facs="tcp:283:108"/>
            </div>
         </div>
      </body>
   </text>
</TEI>
