[Page] A TREATISE OF VSVRIE, DIVIDED INTO THREE BOOKES:

  • The first defineth what is Vsurie.
  • The second determineth that to be vnlawfull.
  • The third remoueth such motiues as perswade men in this age that it may be lawfull.

By ROGER FENTON Bachelar of Diuinitie.

Chrysost. super Matth. Foenerare, non fratri, sed Domino. Hae enim vsurae regnum; illae Gehennam praeparant.

AT LONDON Imprinted by FELIX KYNGSTON, for VVilliam Aspley. 1611.

TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE SIR THOMAS EGERTON, KNIGHT, Baron of Ellesmere, Lord high Chancel­lor of England, one of his Maiesties right Honorable priuie Counsell, and my singular good Lord.

RIght Honorable: the que­stions and controuersies wherewith the Church is in continuall trauell, and which do make our pens so rheumatike in this wri­ting age; be for the most part, matters of speculation, residing in the braine, the coldest region of the little world; and dis­soluing Religion into matter of discourse, not of deuotion. For euery mans Quaere is, not as of old, in the daies of Luk. 3. 10 John Bap­tist, of Luk. 10. 27. Christ, of his Act. 2. 34. Apostles, VVhat shall [Page] we doe? but what shall we thinke? As if the Gospell were not Christiana lex, but Christia­num dogma. Whereas cases of conscience, doe sleepe with conscience, which of all questions are most profitable, and least re­garded: so loth are men to restraine affe­ction, and limit their actions. Yet of all such cases this of Vsurie hath most need to be reuiued. For in this, the custome of sin­ning doth not onely take away the sense, but the acknowledgement of sinne: so as the meere practise of it, hath made an apo­logie for it; without either sound reason, or good authoritie.

This very inducement which perswa­deth others that vsurie is lawfull, hath mo­ued me to write against it, fearing the losse, not onely of so much truth (which I would willingly helpe to redeeme:) but of so ma­ny soules amongst whom I liue. So farre therefore I doe presume in this businesse to trouble Israel, as to tell the people what 1. King. 18 18. is the truth in this point, and the perill of their practise. Wherin they haue so intang­led themselues, that they know not well [Page] how to leaue it. If wee then cannot deuise to make that good, which they haue made necessarie, they will be angrie. Seeing them then thus securely to lull their consciences, I am bold a little to disquiet them.

A businesse so thanklesse, and distastfull as this must needes be, (right Honorable and my singular good Lord) doth require a worthie Patron. And of whom may I de­sire the patronage of my labours, but of your Honour? whose I am, and to whom I owe all dutie and seruice. Of whom should I desire the patronage of these labours, but of your Honour? who are in place to re­forme this sinne, more by the very counte­nance of Authoritie, then wee can with all our endeuours. From whom can I receiue more encouragement in these labours, then from your Honour? whose integritie hath manifested it selfe with zeale against this sinne: whose iudgement will not bee blinded with those forged distinctions of poore and rich borrowers: of toothlesse and biting vsurie, &c.

Let these poore endeuours then finde [Page] fauour in your eyes; not for their owne sake, being vnworthie: but for the cause which I haue in hand. It is the cause of God, and the common good, worthie so hono­rable a Patron. Whom I beseech the Al­mightie long to preserue, a pro­tector of good causes in conscience and equitie.

Your Honors most bounden and dutifull Chaplaine, Roger Fenton.

THE PREFACE TO THE CHRISTIAN READER.

GEntle Reader; thy gentlenesse and patience is much exerci­sed in these times, with the multitude of bookes; which men say they bee commonly forced to put vpon thee by the importunity of their friends. This to mee is no reason at all, for the publishing of this Treatise: and indeed they whom it most concerneth doe least desire it. Yet three motiues I haue which may make sufficient apologie for me.

1 First, seeing the haruest of Vsurers in these parts to be great; at S. Stephens in Walbrooke, the heart of this Citie, I began to labour in this point. By their flocking to those Sermons, they seemed to be ripe, and euen Ioh. 4. 35 white vnto the haruest. But when men assemble after the Act. 17. 21. Athenian fashion, it com­monly proueth a solemne hearing, and a solemne forgetting. Notwithstanding, perceiuing afterwards those poore labours to haue made some little im­pression in the minds of the better sort; I was mo­ued [Page] to make this impression. Wherein after my plaine maner, I haue somewhat, not as I would, re­fined that which then was more rudely deliuered: cast it into a new mold and method, that thou maist carrie the whole frame in thy view, and passe more easily from point to point: and added much more, then in the throng of other busines I could, at that time, thinke vpon.

2 A second motiue hath been the mistakings of some which haue occasioned misreports; as if in the end I concluded nothing, or defended some kind of Vsurie. Which censures I may impute vnto two causes. The first is ordinarie vpon these occasi­ons, where the most attentiue may say, as wise and learned Eliphas said of himselfe: Iob 4 12. Mine eare hath re­ceiued a little of it: for part of that which is only spo­ken, must needs vanish in the aire, before it can bee fully fastned in the mind, and fitted to the whole frame and current of speech. 2 Another cause is, the narrownesse of the point in question. For euery question, as the learned know, hath a point which is scarce diuisible. Comming therefore precisely to cut an vsurious act from such lawfull couenants as doe next adioyne vpon it, the passage is so narrow, that we might easily mistake, or bee mistaken. Not­withstanding thus farre I must appeale to the audi­torie which then was; that when I came to those straites at the conclusion and determination, of the question, purposely to auoid these misconceites; I did often iterate and beate vpon the maine conclu­sion, that, all Vsurie properly so called, is simply vnlawful. But howsoeuer it was either not so exactly deliue­red, [Page] or distinctly taken, as it should: the onely reme­die which now remaineth, is to exhibit the effect of that in writing which then was said; that such as make scruple, may at their pleasure, and best leisure, pause vpon it.

3 Last of all, after that by the handling of this point in publike, I had troubled the waters, and stir­red vp the minds of men to giue censures according to their seuerall apprehensions; I haue taken time to obserue what yet could further be vrged for Vsu­rie; or obiected against that which then was deliue­red: whereby being better furnished by reason of matter newly ministred, then at the first I could; I thought it part of my dutie to giue better satisfacti­on in this kind, and to meet with such probabilities as are, or may with any colour bee suggested. A­mongst which, if I could find any ground of reason, for the defence of any Vsurie at all, I would most willingly either acknowledge it, or be silent. Hither­to I haue found none; but discharged my cōscience according to my simple knowledge. My reward shal be manifold censures no doubt: for what other can be expected in so vnpleasing a matter, and amidst so many aduersaries? Aduersaries, I say, not in affecti­on or argument, but in action. So as being thought ouer busie in this businesse, I feare I shall be occasio­ned to take vp that text of Scripture, though I hope in a farre other cause: Thus was I wounded in the house Zac. 13. 6. of my friends. Bee they friends, or bee they strangers, who are any waies touched in this point; let them strike with the tongue, and wound at their pleasure; I shall thinke my selfe well apaid, if I can cause their [Page] but to feele those wounds which they haue made in their owne consciences, by this sinne.

This Treatise (Christian Reader) is not so large as to require a table, though it be tedious. Howbeit to giue thee some direction (besides the order of the generall heads before the booke) the last chapter being a briefe of the premisses, with reference in the margine to the seuerall places, where the points bee more fully handled; may serue in stead thereof.

So wishing that thou maiest reade with a single eye; iudge of what thou readest without affection; and conforme thy affection to right iudgement: I commend thee to the spirit of grace, whom I beseech, according to the right, to guide and sanctifie the actions of thy life.

R. F.

A TABLE OF THE CONTENTS.

  • The first booke declareth what is Vsurie.
    • Chap. 1. An entrance into the matter.
    • Chap. 2. Describeth Ʋsurie by the names.
      • §. 2. Of the Latin and Greeke names.
      • §. 3. Of the Hebrew names, with the difference which hath been thence taken.
    • Chap. 3. Propoundeth the definition of Vsurie.
    • Chap 4. Explaineth the first terme of the definition, Loane, or mutuation.
      • § 2. Of the first conclusion thence inferred, to the present purpose.
      • §. 3. Of the second conclusion.
    • Chap. 5. Describeth the second terme Couenant.
    • Chap. 6. Describeth the third terme lucre.
    • Chap. 7. Arecapitulation of the premisses.
  • The second booke; whether it be lawfull.
    • Chap. 1. Propoundeth the places of proofe from authoritie.
    • Chap. 2. The testimonie of Scripture, proouing it simply vn­lawfull.
      • §. 2. The first exceptiō against that profe, answered.
      • §. 3. The second exception answered.
      • §. 4. The third exception answered.
      • §. 5. The degree of sinne wherein Vsurie is placed, in Scripture.
    • Chap. 3. The testimonie of Fathers.
      • 1. Of the East.
      • 2. Of the West.
    • [Page] Chap. 4. Of the later times of ignorance.
    • Chap. 5. The testimonie of the Church assembled in Councels.
    • Chap. 6. The testimonie of Diuines in reformed Churches.
      • §. 2. The bitter innectiues of Master Caluin against vsurie.
    • Chap. 7. Of their assertions who haue most fauoured vsurie.
      • §. 2. Of the point of difference amongst Diuines.
    • Chap. 8. Of the testimonie of the Heathen.
      • 1. Philosophers.
      • 2. Historians.
    • Chap. 9. Of the three lawes:
      • 1. Canon.
      • 2. Ciuill.
      • 3. Common.
    • Chap. 10. The first reason from the nature of this question.
    • Chap. 11. The second reason from scandall.
    • Chap. 12. The third reason from the statute law now in force.
    • Chap. 13. The fourth reason proueth it to be vnnaturall.
    • Chap. 14. The fifth reason proueth it to be vngodly against the first table.
    • Chap. 15. The sixth reason proueth it vniust against equitie.
      • §. 1. In respect of the three termes of the desinition.
        • 1. Loane.
        • 2. Couenant.
        • 3. Lucre.
      • §. 2. In respect of the three parties whom it concer­neth.
        • 1. Lender.
        • 2. Borrower.
        • 3. Common-weale.
    • Chap. 16. The sixth reason proueth it vnchristian against charitie.
  • The third booke answering such motiues as per­swade some to the lawfulnesse of it.
    • Chap. 1. Propoundeth the motiues and reasons which perswade men in this age that Vsurie may be lawfull.
    • [Page] Chap. 2. Answereth the first motiue, from custome and con­niuencie.
    • Chap. 3. Answereth the second motiue from pitie concerning
      • 1 Orphans,
      • 2 Widowes,
      • 3 Old men past tra­ding.
    • Chap. 4. Answereth the supposed necessity of Ʋsurie.
    • Chap. 5. Of such cases as seeme vsurious without appearance of vniustice or breach of charitie.
    • Chap. 6. Answereth reasons brought in defence of Vsurie. 2. Proofes wrested from Scripture.
    • Chap. 7. Arecapitulation and inforcement of the premisses.
      • §. 1. From authoritie.
      • §. 2. From Reason.
      • §. 3. The Conclusion.
A TREATISE OF VSVRIE …

A TREATISE OF VSVRIE, DIVIDED INTO THREE BOOKES: The first defineth what is Vsurie.

CHAP. I. An entrance into the matter.

WHen the Sonne of God spake vnto vs in his owne person conuersing as man a­mongst men, his preaching was with that maiestie and authoritie, that it was euermore admired, but neuer de­rided, sauing onely when hee spake a­gainst the seruice of Mammon; then, and only then, Luk. 16. 14 the Pharisies which were couetous mocked him. Small incouragement therefore and little fruit of their labours are simple sinfull men like to haue, who presume ei­ther to preach or write against so gainfull a trade as Vsu­rie is.

Notwithstanding though wee seeme to labour in vaine and catch nothing; let vs at the Ioh. 21. 3. vers. 16. Lords commandement cast out againe on the right side of the ship. For Iesus standing vpon the shore may happely perceiue some scole of fish comming on that side, whereof there is some hope. And verely by their comming there should be great hope: for they will resort in great multitudes to heare these points discussed in pulpits. They will suffer vs to cast the not ouer them; but alas they runne themselues so deep into the mud, that it cannot get vnder them to dragge them out. Sonne of [Page 2] man (saith God to Ezek. 33. 31. Ezechiel) they come vnto thee as the peo­ple vseth to come, and my people sit before thee, and heare thy words, but they will not doe them: for their heart goeth after couetousnesse.

Besides this, the gaine of vsurie is a sweete gaine, with­out labour, without cost, without perill; omne tulit punctum; it is so pleasant and so profitable a sinne, as I perswade my selfe we shall neuer bee able to perswade, though wee doe perswade, that it is a sinne.

Adde moreouer vnto this, that supposed necessity which the custome of vsurie hath brought vpon vs, in so much as citie and countrie is not only stained with this sinne (for staines may be got out) but it is so wouen and twisted into euery trade and commerce, one mouing another, by this engine, like wheeles in a clocke, that it seemeth the very frame and course of traffick must needes be altered before this can be reformed.

Mar. 16. 3 Quis remouebit nobis hunc lapidem? That wee may for­sake this sinne and come vnto Christ by repentance, who shall remoue this great difficultie, which the iniquitie of times by the continuance of this practise hath laid in our way? For if the wise Sages of the Parliament in the 13. yeere of Queene Elizabeth, vtterly condemning all vsurie, in the preface, as vnlawfull; were faine notwithstanding, in the end of that Statute, to tolerate the same in the case of Orphants, according to the custome of Cities; and to passe it ouer vnpunished; because they knew not conueniently how to reforme it: how much more may it seeme in many other cases necessarie to be tolerated in these daies? since it hath eaten deeper into the hearts of Mammonists, and spred further in all commerce betwixt man and man, then euer, amongst vs, in any age before. And if law or Magi­strate by dispensation or conniuence, shall seeme but to suf­fer it; it will presently be conceiued of, as a thing allowed. For vulgar conceits make but small difference betwixt a to­leration and an approbation.

This aduantage then hath the diuell gotten against vs in [Page 3] the practise of this sinne; that vsurie being a trade so gain­full in respect of others, so easie, so cheape, so secure with­out all labour, cost, or perill: being also so common, be­hooffull, and requisite in these times for all occasions; it hath bewitched euen the consciences of those who are most tender in other matters. For if the heart and affection be once wonne and possessed, it is an easie matter euen by slight proofes to turne the braine. Senec. in Hercules surens. Quod nimis miseri vo­lunt hoc facile credunt: Strong affection giueth great credit to weake arguments. Whereas indeed it ought to be con­trariwise; that our naturall pronenesse, and the generall inclination of the world to this practise of Vsurie, should moue a well tempered iudgement the rather to suspect the lawfulnes of it, and the soundnes of such reasons as are brought for it. Perit omne iudicium cum res transit ad affe­ctum: Men looking by affection looke through a mist, or a painted glasse; to whom nothing appeareth in his natiue colour and due proportion.

But were it not for these grosse fogges, which vapour out of the nether part of the soule, and from that which the Apostle calleth the 1. Tim. 6. 20. roote of all euill; those fallacies and so­phistications which the patrons of vsurie haue cast vpon vs, I conceiue might easily be dispelled, both by the beames of Gods law, and by the twilight of nature. Let vs therfore do our poore endeuour to enforme the vnderstanding by eui­dence of argument; desiring God, by his spirit of grace, to reforme the affection, which is the greatest worke in this businesse.

What that vsurie is whereof wee dispute; and Whether it be of it selfe simplie vnlawfull; be the two points wherein the vnderstanding desireth to be resol­ued. And it is a question which of these two que­stions is the greatest. This is certaine, both are ne­cessarie. The former therefore must not be omit­ted, or slightly passed ouer: neither in respect of the name, nor of the nature, seeing it may be some­what [Page 4] enlightened by the very name, though more fullie determined, by the receiued definition of vsurie.

CHAP. II. Of the names of Ʋsurie.

WHen Adam in Paradise did first giue names vnto things, they were so significant and ex­pressiue, as if nature her selfe had spoken. But since the fall, a libertie remaining in the sons of Adam to terme things as it pleased them to conceiue, God likewise and his Angels vouchsafing to speake with the tongues of men, to the end that men might conceiue them: euer since, I say, names haue been no defini­tions. Yet notwithstanding they may hold the candle, and giue some light vnto that whereof wee are to entreate: which in our English tongue is most properly termed by the name of Vsurie. But whatsoeuer the matter is, the more that men haue been in loue with the thing it selfe, the more haue they purposely declined and auoided this name. They will not call it Vsurie, lest the word should be offensiue, or make the thing odious. But it shall be termed Vse or V­sance in exchange, which are smooth words as oyle, neuer abiting letter in them. Or it shall be called Interest, or Con­sideration, which are ciuill and mannerly termes, though by thē they meane indeed nothing else but plaine Vsurie.

This deuice was not first hatched amongst vs in Eng­land; for it is the very same which Master Caluin hath ob­serued before among the French. His words bee these: Caluinus in Ezek. 18. Quia nomen foenoris Gallis fuit incognitum, nomen vsurae etiam, detestabile fuit. Galli ergo excogitarunt nouam astu­tiam quasi possent deum fallere: nam quia nemo poterat ferre vsura nomen, posuerunt interesse. I am quid significat interesse? omne genus foenoris: Because the proper Latine name of V­surie (foenus) was vnquoth to the French, therfore the name [Page 5] euen of vsurie was detestable. The French therefore haue deuised a new trick, as if they could beguile God himselfe. For because no man could endure the name of vsurie, they haue put in place thereof, interest. Now what doth interest with them signifie? All kinde of vsurie. Men be neuer good who vse to change and shift their names; but are euer held for suspected persons and shifters themselues. For hee who is ashamed of his name, his name commonly may be asha­med of him. So is it proportionably in professions. He that is an Vsurer, if you aske what he is, or of what profession; he would not be so termed: what shall we call him then?

Some call him a man that putteth out his money. That is ambiguous. He may put it out, as the Lion putteth out his claw; and then well is hee that commeth not neere his grate. But most commonly he is termed, one that liueth vp­on his money; which is without all exception. For as the Gentleman liueth vpon his rents; the poore labourer vpon the sweate of his browes; the Merchant and Tradesman vpon their aduentures, skill, and industrie; the Husband­man and Grasier vpon the increase of the earth, and breed of cattell; so doth the Vsurer liue vpon his moneis: which doe yeane, and foale, and calue vnto him once in sixe mo­neths at the furthest.

And because the name of Vsurie doth trouble mens con­sciences much more then the thing it selfe; some haue de­uised a new trick of learning, as if there were some reall and materiall difference betweene the gaine of vsurie, and of the vse of money; imagining that vsura in Latine is deri­ued ab vsu rapiendo, and that the Latin condemneth snatch­ing only, as the Hebrue doth biting: insinuating thereby that such vsurie only is forbidden, which is a greedie catch­ing and snatching of gaine by hooke or crooke. Whereas vsura in truth is nothing but vsus rei, primitiuely taken for the vse of Ʋsura lu­cis: Cicero. uxor vsu­raria. Plaut. other things as well as money. And so was vsu­ra originally a good honest word, vntill vsurie did marre it: as wee may obserue it doth in time disgrace any terme or name that is put vpon it.

§. 2.

The proper Latine terme for vsurie is foenus, so called in the iudgement of Grammarians, as if it were foenus pecuniae, the brood of money And in the same sense did the Greekes call it [...] which signifieth to breed, or bring foorth. I am not ignorant how some would deriue [...], of the Hebrew Toc, which signifieth oppression; as if vsurie were not to be misliked for it owne sake, vnlesse it might be conuicted of some sensible oppression. And I must needes confesse that in the 12. Psalme, vers. 14. I finde Toc transla­ted [...] by the Greeke Interpretors. But they are not con­stant therein: for in the 10. Psalme, vers. 7. vatoc is by them translated [...].

And therefore let vs rather follow the generall consent of Grammarians, who fetch it neerer hand, taking the nowne from the verbe. For it is a safe rule for Etymologies, when there is so neere affinitie at home in the same tongue, neuer to trauell abroad, or take so much paines to fetch it from strange languages: like some great spirits of our time, who will haue their names deriued from some ancient fa­mous Romane, though originally they were taken from some notable hillock, or mossie quagmire, before their great grandsires doore. Etymologies and Metaphors be alike in this, if they be too farre fetched they are vnkinde. Besides, the primitiue signification of [...] is, birth. As ap­peareth by [...]. Ili. 2. Homer and [...]. Polit. 7. Aristotle. Next it signifieth the is­sue it selfe, as the first borne is called Luk. 2. 5. Ambros. lib. de To­bia, cap. 12. [...]. According to these two significations the learned haue giuen a double reason of this name. S. Basil and S. Ambrose amongst the ancient; Aretius and others of the later writers, fetch it from the paines, and sorrowes of trauell. Graeci appellarunt vsuras [...] eo quòd dolores partis animae debitoris excitare videantur: The Grecians (saith S. Ambrose) call vsurie [...], birth, because it brings the pangs of trauell vpon the soule of the debtor. Metaphora ducta à parturientibus; qui soluit enim, soluit summo cum doloro & sudore, &c. A woman in tra­uell (saith Problem. de vsuris. Aretius) doth not sweate and labour to bring [Page 7] foorth with greater anguish of minde, then a debtor com­pelled to bring home the principall with increase.

In sup­lem. Psal. 15 S. Basil maketh moneths the only fathers to beget, and borrowers, the mothers to bring foorth this vnnaturall brood of vsurie. Vnnaturall (saith that Father) euen as the brood of vipers which eate through the entrals of their mo­thers: so doth the borrower being foorth for the Ʋsurer, to the destruction of himselfe and his familie.

But the most generall conceit is, that the Greekes and Romanes gaue the names of [...] and foenus vnto vsurie, because of the ancient opinion which the learned had a­mongst them: namely, that this vsurious increase of money, which is neither fruitfull by nature, as land and cattell: nor fit for any other secondarie vse, as to feede, or to cure, or to clothe, or to shelter; but onely to procure such things as haue increase and vse in themselues: that such increase (I say) of so barren a thing, as they conceiued money to be, is vnnaturall. Which position of theirs, though it be not the plainest demonstration that wee haue against vsurie; yet I conceiue wee shall finde much more in it, then they that make the lightest account of it, are ware of.

§. 3.

Come we in the last place to the head spring and origi­nall of all names. For if names can expresse the nature of this sinne, doubtlesse those names of all others must doe it which God himselfe hath vsed in the primitiue tongue, and especially in his law: where he euer vseth the best congrui­tie of speech.

In the first law giuen against vsurie it is forbidden vnder the most significant terme of Exod. 22. 25. Neshec deriued from a word which signifieth to bite; because money so lent commeth not emptie home, but biteth off, gnaweth away, and bring­eth with it some part of the borrowers wealth and sub­stance; who if he cannot lick himselfe whole againe, and cure his wound with biting others, (as commonly they doe) he feeleth in the end to his greater griefe that which at the first he could not perceiue.

[Page 8] Auctor o­peris im­perfecti in Homil. 12. Aspidis morsui similis est pecuna vsuraria: qui ab aspide percutitur, quasi delectatus vadit in somnum, & sic per suaui­tatem soporis moritur: He that is bitten by vsurie (saith S. Chrysostome) is as he that is stung of a serpent: it luls him asleepe so sweetly and securely, that the poore man is vn­done before he be aware. It is well compared (by Baldus) to the little worme that breedes in wood with a soft bodie and hard teeth, which gnaweth secretly the very pith and inward substance of the tree, the barke and outside standing intire. What gallant shewes doe many men make in these daies with other mens money thus borrowed? who, if eue­ry bird should fetch his feather, would be as naked as Ae­sops Crow. For when death heweth them downe, their e­state proueth like a hollow tree; no sound timber for po­steritie to build withall. For why? this worme of vsurie hath gnawed away their substance. Verely money thus ta­ken vp is like a new peece put into an old garment, which being taken away, the rent is made worse. It patcheth vp his necessitie for the present, but after leaueth his estate so ragged and rent, that he is in worse case and more begger­ly then euer he was before.

This biting or gnawing, because it is not alwaies sen­sible, much lesse mortall, (for there bee moates as well as beames in all sinnes which cannot so well be discerned) therefore some subtill wits haue deuised a new distinction to please the world. As if there were some toothlesse and harmlesse vsurie without the compasse of the word Neshec, and without the meaning of the law of God: as if God had neuer meant to condemne Vsurers, but onely to muzzle them for biting. So as, if lender and borrower be both gai­ners, who hath cause to complaine? and why may not Chri­stians then practise so harmelesse and innocent a trade? and for that vsurie which is condemned by the name of Neshec, if these men had the christning of it, they would haue cal­led it by the name of Morsura, not Vsura.

One point then in question (when we come to the mat­ter) will be, whether it be not the nature of all vsurie to [Page 9] bite? though with great difference; some like the English mastiue, some like the dogge-flye; some scarse sensiblie, and therefore not perceiued to be a sinne.

1. First, because many are content to moderate them­selues in this gaine, and then, if it be a sinne, it is but a little one. As Lot said of Zoar, Gen 19. 20. Is it not a little one, and my soule shall liue? Modica sunt quae perdunt nos: They be those little ones that vndoe vs. A moate in the eye if it be not got out in time, may grow to a pin and web; and a mans conscience may suffer shipwrack aswell vpon a sand as vpon a rock. A rock is a great one, a sand is a heape of little ones. He that once or twice hath taken extreme vsurie to the sensible and apparent oppression of his brother, hath runne his consci­ence vpon a rock. But he who to auoid that Scylla, will take but a reasonable moderate conscionable vsurie, (like an ho­nest kind robber, who alloweth a man part of his owne mo­ney back againe to beare his charges) and thus resolueth to liue vpon this practise; he by heaping vp moderate sinnes, wreaketh his conscience vpon a sand; and so sinking into this sin by little and little, his soule is at length easily swal­lowed vp, without sense or feeling at all.

2. Secondly, it is not euer so sensible, because as the V­surer moderating himselfe doth not seeme to bite the bor­rower: so the borrower relieuing himselfe by others, hath no cause to complaine. Yea many borrowers concurring in this practise, by their very multitudes, are able to sway and inhaunce the market, in such manner, that they may liue themselues and pay the Vsurer besides. So that in con­clusion those doe all set vpon the Common-wealth: which being a great bodie, is able to beare many dogges, before she need to complaine; and feeling the wound (as in time she must) she knoweth not well of whom to complaine. Burdensome therefore it is to the Common-wealth: yet Multorum manibus grande le­uatur onus. so dispersed amongst many, that it is the lesse sensible, but neuer a whit the more allowable.

For these and the like causes the biting of vsurie being sometimes not so sensible to particular persons, Almightie [Page 10] God in his wisedome foreseeing how readie men would be to cauill at the word Neshec, hath of purpose expressed his meaning more fully by the exegeticall addition of another terme, which simply signifieth any increase at all. And this hath he done, not only in the Comments of the Ez [...]k. 18 17. Cap. 22. 12 Prophets, but in the very text of the Law it selfe, Leuit. 25. 36. vetar­bith, and vers. the 37. vbemarbith. Which word Pro. 28. 8. Salomon forgetteth not to adde: for Salomons daies being both peaceable and rich in siluer and gold, men would be then more readie in all likelihood to deuise any cauill, or colour to maintaine that sinne.

While the people of God were trauelling in the deseit, or troubled with warres in the land of Canaan, there was little borrowing of money, but only by the poore, for the supplie of their want. And of them to take vsurie was a more sensible biting and oppression: in that they borrow­ed not to lay out for commodities, but to spend for neces­sitie. Therefore Dauid in his troublesome daies vseth the word Neshec onely, for vsurie, as best fitting those times; where the poorest were most bitten by this sinne. But in King Salomons daies, being daies of peace and plentie, plen­tie of money and merchandizing, both by sea and land, for all manner of commodities; those men who were then rich in moneys, might sit still at home and lend foorth their mo­ney to such as by their skill and paines in trauelling and trading abroad, might returne them vsurie for their mo­ney, and bee many times gainers themselues. In which case because there is no such apparant personall biting of the borrower, as when money is lent to the poore to sup­plie present wants; therefore Salomon to preuent these ca­uils at words might adde to the word Neshec, that word al­so which signifieth Increase, or ouerplus. Thereby teaching men that it was the direct meaning of Almightie God sim­ply to forbid all manner of increase whatsoeuer.

Neither are these my priuate coniectures, against the groundlesse distinction of biting and toothlesse vsurie; but Master In Com­ment. in E­zek. cap. 18. vers. 8. Caluin himselfe (vpon whom they seeme to relie [Page 11] as a chiefe patron of vsurie) doth not only condemne it as friuolous; but addeth further that it was the purpose of the Holy Ghost, by adding that other word, to preuent such cauils. Quia homines hac in parte nimium sunt acuti & ver­suti, & excogitant subterfugia, quibus crudelitatem suam te­gant; ideo addit: Et incrementum non acceperit: Because (saith Caluin) men in this kinde be ouer acute and subtill, and deuise euasions how they may more cunningly couer their crueltie, therefore he addeth in the text; vsurie or in­crease. And for the distinction it selfe, Caluin his censure is: Ludunt homines suis cauillis, sed Deus non admittit tales ver­sutias: Men cauill and play with words, but God admitteth no such sleights. His meaning is simple and plaine, that all increase aboue the principall is forbidden.

I should idle the time too much, and wearie the reader, if I should dilate vpon the fond conceits of some to auoid the word Tarbith or increase. Because that word in his na­tiue and vsuall sense directly forbiddeth all vsurie whatsoe­uer; therefore they bend their wits against it.

Some would haue Tarbith, being ioyned with Neshec, to signifie excessiue increase, or multiplication beyond measure. Another sort referre Neshec to money, and Tarbith to vi­ctuals only, as if it were lawfull to take some increase for money, but no increase for victuals at all. These fantasies we finde in certaine blinde Manuscripts, without name or author, which walke vnder hand like Psal. 91. 6 the pestilence in the darke, to infect the mindes of simple men, who are very prone to imbrace euery thing for Gospel, which some men write in priuate, or preach at their tables, in maintenance of their profit.

But tell vs, in good sooth, is Tarbith to be referred to vi­ctuals only, and not to money? so that it shall be lawfull to take Tarbith for money? then doth not Tarbith signifie ex­cessiue increase, or multiplication beyond measure; for I hope it shall neuer be accounted lawfull to take excessiue in­crease for money, or to multiplie vsurie beyond measure. Doth Tarbith signifie multiplication beyond measure? then [Page 12] verely both Tarbith and Neshec are forbidden in money as well as victuals.

See how fitly these conceits doe agree, one ouerthrow­ing another directly: and both being ouerthrowne by the text, and constant interpretation of all authoritie both mo­derne and ancient.

The text as it doth not appropriate Neshec vnto money, but applieth it vnto any thing which passeth for vsurie; (as in Deut. 23. 19. Vsurie of money, vsurie of meate, vsurie of any thing that is put to vsurie) so doth it vse Tarbith for the vsu­rie of money, aswell as of any other thing. For the Pro­phets, who be the true expositors of the law, do ioyne both words together, applying them both indifferently, euer­more to one and the same thing. Ezek. 18. 8. cap. 22. 12. Prou. 28. 8. and that Tarbith being ioyned with Neshec, should signifie any excessiue increase, it hath neither ground in the text, nor any authoritie at all.

The Greeks translate it [...]: the Latines incremen­tum, augmentū; that is, simple increase. So others vse words to the same purpose: Plus, amplius, supra, accessio; any more, any ouerplus, any thing aboue or besides ye principall. That is to say (as the ancient Latine translation readeth, Leu. 25. 36.) Thou shalt not take vsurie of him, nor more then thou ga­uest: or as Lib. de To­bia, cap. 15. S. Ambrose readeth the 37. verse: In amplius re­cipiendum; to receiue more: vbi omne sortis excludit aug­mentum, where it excludeth all increase aboue the princi­pall (as he obserueth vpon the same place.) The Ezek. 18. 8 Geneua translateth it, any increase. So that euen Tarbith, that is, sim­ple increase. (the best name, and the most innocent, that euer vsurie had) is by the law of God vtterly condemned. And therefore bad is the best.

I confesse as yet I haue proued little or nothing at all; but only told you what vsurie is called. And if names be no de­finitions, then arguments taken from names be no demon­strations. Yet thus much I dare presume to conclude, euen from the very name of vsurie in Hebrew, Greeke and La­tine; signifying, cruell biting, painfull trauelling, vnnaturall [Page 13] brood; that the nature of the thing it self is therefore great­ly to be suspected. For certainly it is ominous and very sus­picious to haue a bad name.

CHAP. III. Of the desinition of vsurie in generall.

THat which Offic. 1. Tullie obserued as defectiue in Panaetius, may not be tolerated in this treatise. For if we should omit the defi­nition of vsurie, whereupon the whole state of the question doth depend; wee should write at randome in this whole discourse, and fight with our owne shadow. The two pro­perties of a definition according to the parts thereof, are, to expresse and distinguish. First to expresse the nature of what kinde it is: and next to distinguish it perfectly and essen­tially from all other things of the like nature. And in truth to define, is nothing else but to expresse by distinction. First to expresse the generall nature by some proper terme, which distinguisheth it from all other kindes. And secondly to de­termine the speciall nature, how it standeth different from all other things of that kinde. And so much the very name it selfe doth notifie. For to desine is nothing else but to limit a thing within his owne proper and peculiar bounds.

First therefore all metaphors and borrowed speeches are to be excluded from the definition of vsurie. And we are to deale only with that vsurie which properly is so called. We must not therefore meddle with the vsurie of nature, that most innocent and primitiue increase which the earth yeel­deth in fruite vnto man for his seede sowne; some thirtie, some sixtie, some an hundred fold. Terra nunquam sine v­surareddit quod accepit: The earth (saith De sene­ctute. Tullie) neuer re­turneth that which it hath receiued, without vsurie.

Neither are we to meddle with that supernaturall vsurie which passeth betweene God and man: where sometimes [Page 14] man plaieth the Vsurer, lending vnto God, by giuing to the poore that he may receiue an hundred fold. Prou. 19 17. Foeneratur do­mino qui miseretur pauperis: He lendeth in that kind to the Lord, who is mercifull to the poore. Our God (saith S. In Psal. 26. serm. 3. Qui probi­bet te esse foeneratorē, ille iubet te esse soene­ratorem. Au­gustine) who forbiddeth thee to be an Vsurer, he commandeth thee to be an Vsurer. For it is said vnto thee; Lend vnto the Lord vpon vsurie.

Sometimes God himselfe is the Vsurer; lending tallents vnto men, to lay out that hee may receiue his owne againe, [...], with aduantage, as wee translate it The vulgar saith, cum vsura; Beza, cum foenore. For the word is properly, with vsurie. So it pleaseth the holy Ghost in Scripture somtimes to resemble the workes of light to the workes of darknes: that wee might learne to gather wisedome euen from Ser­pents, and to leaue the poyson behinde. Those delicate wits then, who haue from hence extracted conclusions, as if God, by such parables and allusions, did somewhat fauour vsurie; they must by the same reason iustifie vnrighteous­nes, because the example of the vniust Steward is commen­ded vnto vs; and withall conclude that euen theft it selfe is therefore sanctified, because Christ hath compared him­selfe vnto a theefe in the night. So must we then in this bu­sinesse passe by all parabolicall and borrowed speeches; and onely betake our selues vnto that which is home-bred, proper, and naturall.

Of which there be two kinds; mentall and actuall vsurie. The first consisteth only in the intention of the heart. For he that lendeth so freely to his brother, that he doth not in­dent either by word or deed, for any vsurious gaine: yet if any hope or expectation of gaine was to him a motiue of lending, that man in the Court of Conscience standeth guiltie of this sinne before God. Howbeit the other partie may be innocent in borrowing. Mat. 5. 28 As he that looketh on a woman, to lust after her, hath committed adulterie with her alreadie in his heart; though the woman be neuer so cleere from that sinne. But in actuall vsurie there must be a mu­tuall consent of two parties at the least.

[Page 15] It is my purpose to write of this second, as being more sensible then the former; yet including the former. For euery intention of the heart is determinable by the act it selfe, to be good or bad. If actuall vsurie therefore proue vnlawfull, thereby shall the very thought and intention of the minde be condemned. And if we looke vpon the vsuall practise of the world in this kinde; mentall vsurie is but a little moate, but wee are now haling at the beame it selfe. Hoc opus, hic labor est: It is no time to pick moates.

Actuall vsurie is of diuers described diuersly (a varietie tedious to relate) but the pith of all is briefly contracted in three words, to be, pactum ex mutuo lucrum.

Lucre for loane vpon couenant: or
The Couenant of lucre for lending: or
Lending vpon Couenant for lucre.

So that these three words, mutuum, pactum, lucrum, that is, loane, couenant, lucre, doe define and circumscribe the en­tire nature of that vsurie whereof the maine question is made, whether it be lawful or not.

Therefore whatsoeuer is without the compasse of any of these three termes, though it carrie the name of vsurie, yet it is none indeed. And of whatsoeuer all these three seue­rally and ioyntly may be affirmed; howsoeuer it may passe disguised vnder any other lawfull act, yet is it that actuall vsurie whereof this question is moued.

These three termes therefore must distinctly bee hand­led and rightly conceiued, before it can appeare plainly what vsurie is.

CHAP. IIII. Of the first terme, loane or mutuation.

THe proper obiect of vsury is that which is lent For so is the text: Exod. 22. 25. If thou lend money to my people, to the poore, thou shalt not be as an Vsurer. That ther­fore is vsurie which is taken for loane: yet must wee heere [Page 16] vnderstand a speciall kind of lending, which for the penurie of words and narrownesse of our English tongue, wanteth a proper terme. In Latine it is called mutuum, in which, two words are briefly contracted into one, meum, tuum, into mu­tuum. If I lend thee my money, of mine I make it thine for a time. Thine to doe withall what thou wilt: Thine in vse and propertie both: So thine, as during that time, I will not owne it, nor call thee to account what thou dost with it, be­cause it is thine. But if I lend thee a horse, or a house, I will so passe it ouer, as it shall be mine still and not thine. I will be the owner stil, euen for the time that I haue lent it. And if thou vse it not well, I will haue an action against thee; for this is not, mutuum, but commodatum, lent to vse, but not to spend or bestow.

That lending therefore which is meant in vsurie is defi­ned to be, The free passing ouer both of vse and propertie for a time, at the time ended to receiue the like againe. By which de­scription it is plainely distinguished from all other con­tracts. From giuing, letting, selling, exchanging, commoda­ting, or lending to vse.

1 From giuing it is distinguished, because a gift is for euer: loane is only for a time. Both are a free passing ouer of vse and propertie: but that the one is temporall, the other perpetuall. So that this lending or mutuation differeth from a gift onely in time. It is a free gift for a time: for which time it is not the lenders, but the borrowers, to doe withall what he list; only at the time appointed that he returne the like againe.

2. It differeth also from letting: because in letting wee passe ouer the vse onely, and that for hire: in lending wee passe ouer both vse and propertie, and that freely. These dif­fer therefore in two things. First, lending in it owne proper nature is free; letting is for hire. And therefore wheresoe­uer the Scripture mentioneth lending, it speaketh of it as a worke of mercy and free liberalitie. Psal. 37. The iust is mercifull and lendeth. Luk. 6. Lend looking for nothing againe, &c.

2. Secondly, lending passeth ouer the propertie with the [Page 17] vse, for the time it is lent: letting passeth onely the vse, re­seruing the propertie, euen for that time it is let.

Hence it ariseth, that in a thing freely lent, the borrower standeth to the hazard for that time in equitie, (though there be no such couenant made:) because the borrower is the right owner for the time; and in common right euery thing perisheth to the right owner. But in an hired thing it is otherwise: if it perish, the owner standeth to the hazard, vnlesse it perish by the default of him that hired it.

It perisheth, I say, to the owner. First, because he is the owner: and secondly, because it went for the hire. Accor­ding to the equitie of Gods law, Exod. 22. 15. If the owner thereof stand by, (to wit, that it may appeare not to be the borrowers default) the borrower shall not make it good. For if it be an hired thing, it came for the hire.

3 From selling doth this lending also differ, because sale is a perpetuall alienation of the propertie for a price. Lending is a free alienation for a time. So that though lending and selling doe agree in this, that both doe alienate the propertie with the vse; yet in these two things they differ, that the one is liberall, the other for a price; the one temporal, the other for euer.

4 It differeth from exchange. Not only in time, as giuing and selling doth; but in the obiect; because exchange is the giuing and taking of one certaine thing for another. But in this kind of loane, only the like in the same kind is required at the time appointed to be restored. Besides, in things exchan­ged, there is some difference respected, either of kind, quali­tie, or vse; which mooueth vs to make an exchange. But in simple lending or mutuation, both the same in kind, mo­ney for money, oyle for oyle, corne for corne; the same in quantitie, and the like in qualitie, so much and so good, without respect of difference, is required.

5. Last of all, this lending or mutuation, in the definition of vsury, differeth from that which is called commodation, or free lending to vse. Because mutuation is only of such things whereof vse and propertie cannot be seuered: but they are [Page 18] euermore spent or bestowed in the first vse. As he that len­deth his neighbour a loafe of bread, he lendeth it him to vse and spend both; because the vse of bread is in spending of it. But he that lendeth his seruant, to worke for a day with his neighbour, or his horse to trauell; hee lendeth the vse, but reserueth the propertie to himselfe: Therefore if they doe hurt or abuse that seruant or horse, the owner or lender hath iust cause to complaine.

From the same ground also doth it arise, that in this loane of money, of victuals, of Corne, or the like, we doe not re­quire the same thing in particular, the same graines of corne, but onely the like in kind: because the same particu­lars be spent or done away. But in commodation, or lending to vse the same thing in particular is required: the same ser­uant, the same horse, the same vessell which was lent only to vse.

Hence therefore it proceedeth, that such things only bee thus lent, which doe passe betwixt man and man by weight, number, or measure. For seeing he cannot possibly receiue the particular things againe (which if they be vsed, cannot be restored) therefore he must in equitie haue so many in number, so much in weight or measure, as was lent.

Thus much for the description of the first terme in the de­finition of vsurie, mutuum, that is, loane; from which there are three conclusions for this our present purpose to bee deriued.

§ 2. The first Conclusion.

OVt of the premisses it is gathered, first, That money is not the onely subiect of Vsurie, but whatsoeuer passeth by number, weight or measure: for all such things are subiect to mutuation. To which the very words of the Deut. 23. 29. text doe ac­cord, Vsurie of money, vsurie of meat, vsurie of any thing that is put to vsurie. If a woman should lend her neighbor two egges, to receiue three againe; were it not damnable vsury? because there is an increase or gaine aboue the principall, [Page 19] only for that which yeeldeth no profit to the borrower, be­side the first vse.

A poore man wanteth money to stocke his ground. His rich neighbour lendeth him no money, but twentie sheepe: for which he shall pay him twentie shillings by the yeere, in the name of hire. And so making good the whole flock of sheepe, he shall take lamb and wool, both for their keeping, and for that twentie shillings which goeth for the loane. So that those sheepe which rot or miscarie are none of the rich mans, he will not owne them; they be the borrowers, hee standeth to the hazard, and maketh vp still the number of twentie sheepe. Here then is mutuum the vse and proper­tie both are passed ouer to this poore man: to the end that with the propertie, the hazard also may passe vpon him. Now these immortall sheepe which neuer die, do bring an annuall increase or gaine to the rich man; for the meere loane of them: which is plaine vsury, howbeit not of money.

§ 3 The second Conclusion.

IN the loane of money (of which principallie it is my pur­pose to write, being the most vsuall and proper for these parts) be it thus concluded out of the premises; That gain or lucre which commeth not meerely for loane; (such loane, which is before described) is no vsurie. For the obiect of vsurie is mutuum. It is no vsurie, I say, if it be for other respectiue considerations, and not meerely for loane.

A man vnskilfull in trading hath a stock of money, which he deliuereth to a merchant or tradesman to imploy: recei­ueth part of gaine, and beareth part of hazard proportiona­bly. This is no vsurie, but partnership. No vsury, because his money is not lent by mutuation, so long as he reserueth a propertie in it himselfe, in contractu societatis cessat obiectum Molinaeus de contract. vsurar. initio. vsurae, mutuum. In like manner the stocke of a widow or an orphant is in trust committed to a friend to imploy and vse it in charitie, onely to their vse: they haue the benefit of the increase; which is no vsurie; because the money is still [Page 20] theirs, it prospereth or perisheth to them, as to the right owners.

A man lendeth for a time freely; that time being expi­red, his money is retained longer against his will, for want whereof he is damnified. If the lender receiue an ouerplus in this case aboue the principall, answerable to the damage which he hath suffered; this is no vsurie, but due and iust satisfaction. No vsury, because increase is not taken for the loane. For loane is a voluntarie act: whereas this money was not willingly lent, but retained by force after the time it was due. If the lender had been damnified by the for­bearance of his money during that time which he lent it, he could in strict iustice haue exacted no satisfaction, because it was his owne voluntary act: Volenti non fit iniuria. But the time being come out, to receiue ouerplus for his losse sustained, is no vsurie, but a iust recompence, which is pro­perlie termed interest.

A great man by his authoritie, doth wring from an infe­riour person the loane of such a sum, which he cannot spare without sensible detriment; and yet perhaps, in regard of the mans greatnes, he had better lose the principall then denie the loane. To receiue interest, that is to say, recompence for the forbearance of this money, is no vsurie, because it was not voluntarily lent by him, but by some violence extorted from him. As if a man should command a poore mans tooles, without which he cannot earne his liuing, if he giue him not satisfaction, he committeth extortion. The monies of a tradesman, be his tooles, by which he getteth his liuing. If therefore they be either retained, or forced from him to his sensible detriment, satisfaction is due in iustice and equi­tie, without touch of vsurie.

To sell wares for time, and in respect of time to sell dea­rer, may be free from vsurie: Either in respect of the rising of the commoditie so sold, if by the ordinarie course of sea­sons, it will be worth more at the day of paiment of the mo­ney, then it was at the time of sale and deliuerie. Or in case a man can neither vent his commoditie for present money; [Page 21] nor keep it longer without corruption or detriment to the ware; nor forbeare the money without sensible preiudice to himselfe: these may seeme valuable considerations with­out compasse of this terme. But admit a man will sell dee­rer of purpose for the forbearance; and forbeare of purpose, onely that he may sell dearer, without pregnant likelihood of the market rising at the time of paiment; or of damnify­ing of himselfe, by keeping his word, or such like valuable considerations; that is vsurie. For it is allone as if he lent so much money for lucre vpon couenant.

§ 4. The third Conclusion.

IF it be a gaine couenanted meerely in respect of loane, it is condemned as vsurious. For then is it Vimutui, for the loane before described, though it come neuer so disguised vnder the colour of a lawfull contract, as many times it doth.

1. Somtimes vnder the colour of buying. If I should lend one hundred pound; the principall to be repaied by tenne pound a yeere in ten yeeres, and ten pound a yeere ouerplus for the vse of that money: this were extreme vsurie within the statute. If therefore purposely to auoid the statute, I do agree with the borrower to alter the nature of the contract, thus: With the same hundreth pound I will purchase an annuitie of twentie pound for ten yeers of the same partie. This is bargaine and sale; yet is it the very same thing in truth; differing only in the parchment and manner of coue­nanting; subiect to the same iniquitie and inequalitie; poi­soned with their ioynt purpose of auoiding the penaltie of vsurie by other conueiances. For if their purpose could by some pregnant circumstances be discouered, the same Sta­tute would condemne them of vsurie.

2. Sometime it passeth vnder the colour of selling. A merchant lendeth his chapman one hundred pound freely, but with condition that he will in lieu of his courtesie take a commoditie that lieth vpon his hand at such a price, pay­ing [Page 22] for the purpose eight or ten pound deerer then he might haue bought elsewhere; had he not as good haue paid ten pound for the loane of his money? Or more cunningly thus: A countrey Gentleman would borrow one hundred pound of his deare friend a Tradesman. Answere is returned, That he hath no money, but rather then faile, for old loue and ac­quaintance, he shall haue 100. pounds worth of ware euen out of his shop presently to make money of. The Gentle­man cannot make it: therefore he doth him yet a further kindnesse, in sending to a friend that shal sell it for him (note by the way, that friend is his broker:) who after long dis­course what a preiudice it is to proffer ware, and after much seeking, he hitteth vpon a friend who will giue the Gentle­man fourescore and eight pound, present money, for his ware (and that friend is the brokers owne master, who lent the ware.) The poore Gentleman glad of present money giueth the broker for his paines. Now this tradesman that hath twelue in the hundreth, is in expectation besides of as great kindnesse as the free loane of one hundred pound is worth, (whereof this Gentleman will not faile him, be­cause hee would keepe such a friend in a corner for a pinch:) and he hath beside pleasured his broker for doing nothing, for the ware was neuer stirred out of his place. This vn­der colour of selling is direct vsurie, and somewhat else be­sides.

3. Sometime it is committed vnder the colour of let­ting. A man lendeth his neighbour such a summe of mo­ney, conditionally, that he will take such a house at such a rent: prouided alwaies, that the rent of the house shall pay for the vse of the money. More cunningly, thus: A coun­trey Farmer commeth to an Vsurer, and telleth him of such a lease for yeeres to be sold, for three hundred pound. If it please you (quoth the Farmer) to deliuer mee so much mo­ney, I will buy that lease in your name with your money; you shall sit still, neuer trouble your selfe to looke after it; let me be your tenant for thirtie pound a yeere, and I will put you in good securitie for the paiment of three hundred [Page 23] pound, when the lease shall expire. This is vsury vnder the colour of letting.

4 Sometime it passeth vnder the colour of free loane or mutuation. A poore man desireth a Goldsmith to lend him such a summe, but he is not able to pay him Interest. If such as I can spare (saith the Goldsmith) will pleasure you, you shall haue it for three or foure moneths. Now, hee hath a number of light, clipt, crackt peeces (for such hee vseth to take in change with consideration for their defects:) this summe of money is repaid by the poore man at the time appointed in good and lawfull money. This is vsurie, that is, gaine for loane, vnder colour of free loane. Or thus: A yong Gallant would borrow an hundred pound for a yeere; the Vsurer in kindnesse will lend him so much freelie for three moneths. The Gentleman glad to finger the money, accepteth his kinde offer. The Vsurer takes sure bonds, knowing that he who is so hungrie for a yeere, will not be in case to pay at three moneths; then shall the forfeiture of the bond pay the Interest of the money with aduantage; only, forsooth, because the Creditour is exceedingly dam­nified in being disappointed at the time. This were vsurie, if the craftie purpose of the Vsurer were discouered. Or thus: One lendeth tenne pound vpon a pawne of bed­ding or linnen, and hee lendeth it freely: but as the other vseth his money, so hee likewise vseth his pawne. This is vsurie; for the bedding or linnen is sensibly worse for the wearing, so is not the money.

5 Sometime vnder the colour of Merchants exchange, deliuering money vpon bils at home, to be paid in other countries: A practise which some would vtterly condemne; but considering the great vse of it, I would not rashly con­demne it: but will imagine rather how it may haue his grounds in equitie and iustice.

1 Either because the office of transportation is therein implied. For hee who deliuereth money here to be repaid beyond the Sea, performeth the same office, and doth the borrower no lesse benefit, then if he conueyed his money [Page 24] for him out of another countrey home; and somwhat more, because this is done instantly, that could not be done but in longer time.

2 Or else, because money present is more worth then absent, not in any vsurious respect, but in a lawfull estimate; for there is no present vse of that which is absent. And be­sides, that which is in another countrey, cannot be made present without some cost, labour, or perill.

3 Or in respect of the value of money in the place where it is paid vpon bill: for though the value of coynes remaine one and the same, yet summes of money may rise and fall in exchange (woe be to thē who conspire to raise them) yet scarsitie of money at some times may make great summes more pretious, and harder to come by; and then euery man drawing as much as he can home, it maketh the transporta­tion from forraine places to be of greater difficultie.

This Reall Exchange though it may stand iustifiable vp­on his owne grounds, yet, vnder it, is cloaked a mysterie of iniquitie, that is, of vsurie; either by that vsance and double vsance, vsed only to an vsurious intent: or specially by that counterfeit Exchange, termed by the name of Cambium sic­cum, or, drie Exchange; because it hath no more iuyce or sap then a painted tree, either in charitie or equitie: but be­ing a griping vsurie vnder the title of Exchange, it drieth vp the fountaine of both.

6 Sometime it masketh vnder the habit of hazard and aduenture. For because in that which is mutuum, hee that lendeth passeth away together with the propertie, all ha­zard and aduenture of the principall. A man therefore to preuent this, will deliuer thirtie pound the sixt of Decem­ber, to receiue 33. pound for it the second of Iune next fol­lowing, if the sonne of the said lender be then aliue. If hee die before the day, that then the debtor should pay but 27. pound of the principall. This was L. Cooke in 5. part of Reports. Claytons case, adiudged to be vsurie. For that this hazard or vncertaintie of life is not to be accounted of: because by the same reason that he may adde one life, hee may adde many. If it be not sen­sible [Page 25] and proportionable, it is but a mockerie.

But put the case of a mans owne life, and make the ad­uenture more sensible and proportionable. As thus: A man hauing no charge to leaue behinde him, or little care of them, vseth to lend out his money for ten in the hundred, if he shall liue vntill the daies of paiment; prouided alwaies, that if he the said Creditor die, then his executors shall re­ceiue but foure score pound for the hundred pound. His case then standeth thus: First, he hopeth to liue many yeers, and when he dieth he is sure to die but once: then shall his executors (who those shall be God knowes, and not he): his executors, I say, shall pay twentie in the hundred, of such summes only as then shall be abroad at vse. Vnder co­lour of this aduenture (which selfeloue in many maketh no aduenture) hee would lend his money, and liue vpon the loane, while he liueth. But tell me, in good sooth, wilt thou take ten in the hundred if thou liue? then by this couenant thou wilt be an Vsurer if thou liue. No condition shall barre thee from it, but only death. Then, verely of necessi­tie, thou must die an Vsurer by vertue of the same coue­nant. And tell me in thy conscience, doest thou thinke thy Executors after thy death can redeeme thy soule from that sinne wherein thou diedst; by paying so much in the hun­dred of thy wealth, which then shall be none of thine? Filij huius seculi; how wittie and subtill are the children of this world in twisting snares to intangle their owne conscien­ces at the houre of death? Qui volunt esse diuites: They that will be rich (saith the 1. Tim. 6. 9. Apostle) not they that would by lawfull and direct meanes; but, they that will be rich fall into temptations and snares: such snares as the more they struggle to get foorth, the faster doe they intangle themselues.

CHAP. V. Of the second terme of the definition, Pactum, Couenant.

ALbeit an ouerplus or increase bee giuen and receiued for the meere loane, either of money, or of any thing which passeth by Number; Weight, or Measure; yet it is no vsurie, except it be by some coue­nant or contract before. This also is es­sentiall, and expressed in the very letter of the law of God, Thou shalt not impose vsurie, &c. So doe Ʋatablus, Pagnin, Exod. 22. 25. and Tremellius reade it, Non impones. So likewise the Greek Interpreters, [...]. Now there can be no exaction or im­position vpon a free person but by way of couenant. A co­uenant is a mutuall agreement vpon a certaintie. First it must be an agreement, that is, a voluntary consent, presupposing both libertie of will to giue assent, and abilitie of vnder­standing to know the thing agreed vpon. Secondly, it must be mutuall. For though one partie agree vnto it, yet it is no couenant vnlesse both giue consent mutually. Thirdly, that mutuall agreement must be reduced vnto a certaintie, else it is void. If both parties doe not vnderstand one certaine thing, it is no couenant: and therefore we see, that a condi­tionall couenant, because it dependeth vpon some future vncertaintie, is no couenant at all; but vpon this condition, that, that vncertaine thing doe proue certaine.

If a mans money freely lent for a time, be by force retai­ned past that time, to the sensible detriment of the lender; we haue before concluded that a recompence is due. But in case a couenant bee made of free loane for such a time, and if it be not repaied at such a time, then so much to be al­lowed for Interest: this couenant maketh vsurie, which before was none.

A man lendeth his neighbour a summe of money to [Page 27] trade withall, and that freely. This borrower becommeth a gainer: out of his thankfull minde he doth gratifie the len­der with some part of his gaine. This is no vsurie, but a thankfull gratuitie, termed by the name of foenus liberale; and it is lawfull to giue and take, where it is not lawfull to couenant or contract before. For as to gratifie a Patrone for preferment, a Iudge for iustice, vpon any precedent stipula­tion, promise, or demaund, is Simonie in the Church, Bribe­rie in the Common-wealth: so is it vsurie in any fashion to contract before the time of the loane. The reason of all this is, because neither iustice, which God and nature haue made free for all; nor sacred things sanctified and set apart for the seruice of God; nor workes of mercie, bountie or fauour, as giuing and lending; are in their owne natures any waies capable of bargaine and sale. Couenant there­fore is that which poysoneth the nature of them, and tur­neth them into sinne; the sinne of Simonie, Briberie, Vsu­rie: let them goe together.

But that men deceiue not themselues in mistaking this terme of Couenant, vnderstand briefly the latitude of it: It is either reall, by pawne laid in both for principall and In­terest: Or literall, by writing without pawne, as by bill, booke, or bond: Or personall, without writing, in taking another man for suretie befides the borrower: Or verball; either by promise without suretie before witnesse, or by se­cret stipulation, betweene themselues without witnesse: Or silent, without word, witnesse, writing, or pawne: and this silence either of one partie, or both. Of one thus:

An Vsurer saith, I will lend you thus much money, but so much Interest you shall pay me. The borrower takes it in fi­lence: this silence is a promise, and that promise a couenant. Nay, where there is silence on both sides, there may be an vsurious couenant. A common borrower commeth to a common Vsurer to take vp an hundred pound for three moneths; there is neither bill, bond, promise, nor demaund for any Interest: only this; the borrower knoweth how that Vsurer neuer lendeth his money but for tenne in the [Page 28] hundred. Likewise the Vsurer knoweth how that borrower neuer taketh vp, but vpon Interest. The very act of borrow­ing and lending in these two parties by common intend­ment, is a couenant for Vsurie: and euery couenant what­soeuer, whether it be silent or expresse; whether it be bare and naked in promise, or inuested by further securitie, if it be a couenant for loane, it is Vsurie.

CHAP. VI. Of the third terme, Lucrum, gaine.

ALbeit there be a couenant meerely for loane, yet if there be no lucre, it is no vsurie. I vse the word Lucre, rather then Gaine, because it is more proper for this purpose in the English. 1. Tim. 6. 6 Godlinesse is great gaine, but god­linesse is no lucre. Lucre is cleere gaine in money or mo­ney worth. That which is couenanted or agreed vpon for meere loane, must also be cleere gaine. For where equalitie is, there can bee no vsurie: Cleere gaine either in money, which is a certaine price, or else in money worth, which is valuable and to be rated at a certaine price; for (as Lib. de To­bia, cap. 14. S. Am­brose saith) Et esca vsura est, & vest is vsura est, & quodcun (que) sorti accedit vsura est; quod velis ei nomen imponas, vsura est: Be it meate or apparell, or any ouerplus aboue the princi­pall, what euer you call it, it is Vsurie.

A man lendeth money to his neighbour freelie in his need, (for though hee be a rich neighbour, yet vpon occa­sion he may want a summe of money for lawfull and neces­sarie imployments:) promise passeth to requite his kind­nes another time in lending him as much againe for his oc­casion. Here is a couenant for loane, yet no vsurie: because no couenant for cleere gaine, but one good turne for ano­ther. And where there is equalitie there is no vsurie. Christ alloweth Luk. 6. 34 [...] in this kinde.

A man oweth me ten pound. I wot not how to come by [Page 29] it: He commeth to me for tenne pound more: I condition with him that he shall put in good securitie for the whole debt of twentie pound: which if hee doe willingly yeeld, this is to me, as the case now stands, a profitable couenant for the loane of money; yet it is no vsurie, because no cleere gaine, but only a recouerie of mine owne due debt, with out wrong offered to any.

A man lendeth money to get the friendship of such a person as may stand him in stead. A friend in Court is worth a penny in the purse. But because his friendship cannot be valued or set at a certaine price, therefore it is no lucre, and consequently no vsurie.

A shopkeeper lendeth money freely to a Chapman, co­uenanting with him that hee will not bauke his shop, but that he may take his money before another. This is gaine to the shopkeeper: but it is not valuable at any certaintie, so long as hee may be serued in that place for his money as well as elsewhere. But in case he make him pay dearer for his ware, because he lent him money, that is vsurie.

I lend a poore labouring man money freely, but condi­tioning that he shall worke so many daies with me in har­uest freely; this is vsurie: for a daies worke is valuable at a certaine price: therefore is it lucre and money worth.

There is an Office or Lease fallen void of such a yeerely value: I lend my Courtly friend a summe of money for such a time, freely without vsurie; onely couenanting that he will procure the said Lease or Office: This is vsurie; for though his friendship at large was not valuable, as is afore­said, yet now being reduced vnto a certaintie, in this par­ticular, it may be valued at a price. Therefore is it lucre, and so consequently direct vsurie.

CHAP. VII. Abriefe recapitulation of that which hath been said.

BY that which briefly hath been deliuered, it may in some sort appeare, how vsurie hath been cal­led, and what it is. The Gentiles, both Romanes and Grecians, led by the light of nature, termed it the vn­naturall brood or generation of that which by nature is barren. The spirit of God in Scripture hath branded all in­crease and ouerplus, whatsoeuer aboue the principall, by the name of a biter or gnawer; as appeareth by the exegeticall ioyning of Tarbith with Neshec, in the Law and the Pro­phets. Which increase and ouerplus comming for the loane, either of money, or any thing which passeth by num­ber, weight or measure, if it come meerely for loane, with­out any other valuable consideration: and meerely for that loane which passeth ouer the propertie, and with the pro­pertie the perill and aduenture of the principall: and if it come for this loane, not by way of gratuitie afterward freely giuen; nor in the name of satisfaction for damage suffered by the lender without his owne act and consent; but by former couenant and voluntarie contract betwixt the borrower and the lender: and if this couenant be for lucre and gaine, cleere gaine, valuable gaine, ratable at a certaine price, either in money or money worth; then is it that vsurie whereof the question moued is now to be dis­cussed: Whether it be a thing indifferent in it owne nature, in any kinde allowable; or, whether it be simplie to be condemned as a sinne before God.

In this defining of Vsurie, and distinguishing of it from all such practises as be only like vnto it, and doe border vp­on it; we ought so neere as wee can, to cut it by a threed; and in the examining of the seuerall branches we shall meet with much finer and subtiller threeds, then hitherto wee [Page 31] haue: (ouer fine, I confesse, for so blunt an instrument.) Not­withstanding this caueat I would gladly commend vnto you before hand; that if this vsurie thus described, do proue to be a sinne of that nature and degree, as I am afraid it will; men would not inure themselues in their commerce to coast ouer neere vpon it, lest by little and little they be in­ticed by so sweete and pleasant a baite, as this kinde of lucre is: for the sweeter bait the diuell vseth, the more dangerous is the hooke. It was the wisedome of God in the training vp of his Church at the first, to make Ceremoniall lawes, as a pale to hedge in and compasse his Morall law, like the railes about Mount Sinay; to the end that by the obseruing of the Ceremoniall, men might be kept aloofe from the transgression of that which is Morall; as the abstaining from the blood of beasts taught them how farre they should bee from blood-thirstines and crueltie towards man. A point so easie that it is obserued in matters most triuiall. A man will not ride so neere the brink of a pit or ditch as he can, for feare of falling, but keepe a certaine di­stance off, that he may be the more secure. It is wisedome in iourneying, I would to God it were so in liuing. For as in nature, opposites meete not without a middle nature, so in moralitie, Vertue and Vice touch not without some in­different thing. There be certaine brackish qualities which sauour of vice, yet cannot absolutely be condemned; euen so for vsurie: there be some contracts neere vpon it, which notwithstanding being filed and refined with many di­stinctions and cautions, may happelie proue indifferent and lawfull: yet sure it is, those men who will not abstaine from some things which are law­full, shall of necessity commit ma­nie things which are vnlawfull.

The end of the first Booke.
THE SECOND BOOKE PRO …

THE SECOND BOOKE PROVETH VSVRIE, AS IT IS BEFORE DEFINED, TO be vnlawfull: First by authoritie; next by reason.

CHAP. I. Wherein are propounded places of proofe from authoritie.

ALL proofe is reduced generally to two heads: Authoritie, and Reason. In the former wee see with other mens eyes: In the second with our owne. And though it bee a wise mans part to see with his owne eyes; yet must wee bee fooles first, that wee may be wise; Ci­sternes, before we be Conduits: for hee that will not suffer himselfe to be led first and guided by others, shall neuer be able to finde the right way himselfe: and certes, good au­thoritie, neuer had aduersarie but pride and singularitie: I meane the authoritie of the most and the wisest.

Let vs consider then in the first part of this booke, what they haue thought in former ages of this point, who haue been much wiser then our selues, and haue had as iust occa­sion to looke into it: for Vsurie is no new deuice, but an ancient sinne, which hath been continually practised in all ages, and in the most famous and flourishing nations of the world. The authoritie therefore of the wise and learned in [Page 33] former times ought to be a great motiue to sway our iudge­ments in this point; and if there be any goodnesse or law­full moderation in vsury, doubtlesse some of them haue found it out.

1 But before we come vnto them, we will first lay that diuine authoritie for a foundation to the rest, which is be­yond all exception. For the testimonie of authoritie, which of all arguments in Logicke is the weakest, is the strongest in Diuinitie.

Let vs see therefore in the first place, what the Scripture saith of vsurie, for it, or against it. For where that Oracle vouchsafeth to speake, there is not any need of further au­thoritie for confirmation. They are therefore ouer simple, who doe imagine that humane authoritie is alleaged to adde authoritie vnto Scripture; as if that were defectiue: Sola sufficit ad omnia satis superque: Ʋincen­tius Liri­nensis. It is alone alsufficient for authoritie, if it be not mistaken. The Church therefore doth comment vpon the Scripture, only for explication of the text. The text is absolute in it selfe, but obscure vnto vs, in regard of the weakenes of our vnderstandings, and variety of apprehensions. We must therefore of necessitie borrow light from others, especially in these difficult cases of con­science, which subtill wits haue spun into so many fine threads, and which depend vpon so many circumstances.

2. And because consent of Churches doth adde great validitie vnto authoritie, it will not be amisse first to see what the Fathers of the East Church thought among the Grecians; and how the Westerne Church hath seconded the same among the Romanes in her puritie, before such time as corruption had ouergrowne her.

3. Afterward when corruption both in doctrine and manners had spread ouer, and blemished the face of the Church, it wil be obseruable, how this doctrine concerning vsurie did preserue her ancient integritie.

4. But because all these are but the testimonies of seue­rall learned men in their writings, yt which may be added as the voice of the Church ioyntly assembled in Councels, [Page 34] will carrie more weight with it.

5. Moreouer, because a dwarse set vpon a Giants shoul­ders, hauing the vantage of his whole body, may happily see further then the Giant himselfe; we will see what our mo­derne writers haue added vnto the authoritie aforesaid; and whether our reformed Churches haue reformed any thing concerning this point. All these put together (if they had a good Collector) would make so sufficient a comment vp­on the law of God concerning vsurie, as a man of learning and modestie would not easily gainesay.

6. But we haue yet a larger field to walke in: for this is a question of that nature, as is not onely determinable by the law of God in Scripture; but also by the law of Nature, those maximes and principles of common equitie, which are written in the hearts of men by the finger of God. Those students of Nature therfore, the Philosophers, may of right challenge a voice in this businesse.

And because the experience and practife of States and Common-wealthes doth adde much to the twilight of Na­ture, especially in these matters of negotiation and com­merce betweene man and man; it will not be much out of the way, to obserue by the way, what such writers haue ob­serued in their Politikes, for the publik good; which in this point is especially to bee obserued, euen for conscience sake.

7. Last of all, because we haue not a better rule to pro­ceed by, in the searching of what is good and lawfull in a well gouerned estate, then those wholesome lawes which haue been established vpon sage aduice and deliberation, out of long experience, and the receiued grounds of com­mon equitie: it will be behooffull and materiall to listen a little to the Canon and Ciuill lawes, which haue gouerned so many Nations, both Christian and Heathen: and finally, to returne home and note (though briefly, as becommeth Diuines) what the Municipal, or Common law of this land, vnto which wee are subiect, hath decreed concerning this matter.

[Page 35] Now if these authorities shall ioyne in one against vsury, they who shall oppose themselues in defence thereof, had need to come well appointed with strong arguments and sound reasons, or else me thinkes we should hardly beleeue them.

CHAP. II. The Testimonie of Scripture.

IF we take our Sauiour Christ his diuision of the Scriptures, which he made to his disciples go­ing to Emmaus, into Luk. 24. 44. Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalmes; these bee all three against vsurie. Moses wrote fiue bookes, two of historie, and three of law. In euery one of his law-books, Exodus, Leuiticus, and Deu­teronomie, there is an expresse law against vsurie.

Exod. 22. 25. If thou lend money to my people, to the poore with thee, thou shalt not be as an Vsurer vnto him, thou shalt not oppresse with vsurie.

Leuit. 25. 35. If thy brother be impouerished or fallen into decay with thee, thou shalt releeue him, and as a stranger or a soiourner, so shall he liue with thee; thou shalt take no vsurie of him nor vantage, or more then thou gauest. Thou shalt not giue him thy money for vsury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.

Deut. 23. 29. Thou shalt not giue to vsurie to thy brother, as vsurie of money, vsurie of meate, vsurie of any thing that is giuen to vsurie. Vnto a stranger thou maist lend vpon vsurie, but thou shalt not lend vpon vsury to thy brother, that the Lord thy God may blesse thee.

Thus farre is the letter of the law, which is vehemently vrged by the Prophet Chap. 18 13. 17. Cha. 22. 12 Ezechiel, by the Psal. 15. 5 Psalmist, and his son Pro. 28. 8 Salomon. Against which law three exceptions haue bin deuised.

§ 2.

The first is verball (which wee touched in the second Chapter of the first booke) in laying hold vpon the biting [Page 36] word Neshec, auoiding the other word Tarbith; as if that would bite the cause. This verily is hard dealing, when the holy Ghost ioyneth two words of purpose together, both in the law and Prophets, to make his meaning full; that we should presse the one, and leaue the other. When God is not content to forbid biting vsurie onely in Neshec, but all in­crease in Tarbith and Marbith, doubling the second frō the same roote, as if he would set the Emphasis purposely vpon increase; these will haue it set vpon Neshec, biting vsurie. What is it then which they would so gladly wring out of Neshec? Forsooth that no vsurie is forbidden in Gods law, but onely biting vsury. And that there is no biting vsury, but when it is felt and knowne to bite (for wee must giue them that in, besides, or else they be neuer a whit the nee­rer.) Alas good simple widowes, who are taught to liue se­curely in the feare of God vpon vsurie; can they tell when, or whom, or how many their vsurie doth bite? Nay can the wisest vsurers of them all tell? For if the borrower be bitten, he had best to keepe his owne counsell, and to set his best face vpō it: otherwise if the Vsurers do once smel him to be downe the wind, he shall seldome find them within. Can they tell when the Common-weale is bitten? Can they dis­cerne how many poore people shall pay a pennie in the pound the dearer for them and their fellowes? No, no, vsu­rie walketh in the darke, it biteth, few know, when, where, or how. Onely thus much in general we must needs know, that the borrowers vpon vsurie cannot afford their ware so good cheape by nine or tenne in the hundreth, as if their stocks were free; and yet must they needs sell as the market goeth. Therefore if there be not a sufficient number to raise the market to their price, and so to cast the burthen vpon the people, they themselues shall feele the weight of it. To make this more plaine by the most accustomed and mode­derate vsurie of these times. If money be lent to spend vp­on necessaries, there is no manner of question made, but the borrower is sore bitten in paying vsury, when he hath spent the principall. If it be lent to lay out for gaine, then must [Page 37] the borrower first be sure of so much cleare gaine, as will pay the vse, which is a reasonable gaine of it selfe. For the Vsurers of nine or tenne in the hundreth doe liue well of their trade and grow rich by it. Yea many honest trades­men will confesse, that if they could with their owne free stocke raise the like gaine one time with another, that the Vsurer doth with his moneies; and with the like securitie of the principall; they would thinke they had made a very good market, notwithstanding all their care and trauell.

This reasonable gain then must first be raised by the bor­rower, to pay the Vsurer; and ouer and aboue he must ex­ceed this reasonable gaine, to maintaine himselfe and his seruants, because this gaine is none of his. If he doe not ex­ceed then, and that in some proportion, he hath lost his la­bour, and shall feele himselfe sore bitten. If the borrower doe exceed the Vsurers gaine to maintaine himselfe; I de­mand then who paieth this excessiue gaine ouer and aboue that reasonable gaine of tenne in the hundred? Who but the Common-weale? Not so (saith the Vsurer;) for the borrower must sell as the market goeth. It is very true. Ther­fore (say I) if hee and his fellowes be not able to raise the market to their owne price, they shall bee losers: If they can inhaunce it (as they may the more easilie, because the number of such borrowers is great, and because the rest de­siring to sell as deere as they can, will most willingly ioyne with them) then the Common-weale must needs beare the burthen, and especially the poorer sort, who buying all by piece-meale at the last hand, must be sore bitten, though they know not by whom. One of the biting dogs which pincheth them sore, is vsurie. Yet gladly would they per­swade vs, that vsurie in some other respect by way of a­mends, doth licke them whole againe. Because by this meanes (forsooth) money is more stirring, and so by a quic­ker turne and returne, euery commoditie is more plentifull: for charitie and friendship in these daies bee not so com­mon, that men would lend out their money so freely, if they had not gaine for the vse. This is very true, it cannot be de­nied. [Page 38] And the reason hereof is, because the common pra­ctise of vsurie hath taught men to set a price vpon charitie and friendship; as if he, who lent his friend or a yong begin­ner one hundred pound for a yeere, did in effect giue him tenne pound cleere out of his purse. But admit this dogge were tied vp; would rich men preiudice the Common-weale in these daies, by imprisoning their moneies in their coffers, thinke you? Verily if vsurie were not, men would tenter their wits, either in trading themselues, or imploy­ing others; rather then so current and necessarie a thing as money is, should take rust in these peaceable and getting daies. But who would racke his braine, and moile himselfe in the world, if he may sit idle at home, and receiue so sweet a gaine without labour, cost, or aduenture? So that if bor­rowers escape, the Common-weale must beare it. If the Common-weale goe free (as seldome it doth) the borrow­ers are bitten. Sometime the burthen is diuided betwixt them; and still the Vsurer is the gainer.

Vsury then biteth one or other, little or much, according to the degree of the interest: from the biting of the mor­ning wolfe to the flea-biting: from that Centesima, the Zeph. 3. 3. hundreth part monethly, which Nehemiah complaineth of, which is twelue in the hundred (the most that we find tole­rated Nehe. 5. 11. euer amongst the Heathen) vnto that semiuncianum foenus, tenne shillings in a hundred pounds, scarce sensible: So that in euery Tarbith, there is a Neshec, a tooth in euery vsurie: which because it cannot be alwaies felt, or percei­ued, it hath pleased God to adde that other terme, which is more sensible, vsurie or increase. The deuisers therefore of this distinction, of biting and toothlesse vsury, forced out of the word Neshec, haue discouered two errors, whereupon they seeme to build as vpon a sure foundation.

1. First, they presuppose, that if vsurie doe not bite the borrower, it biteth none at all; as if the publike good were not to be regarded, but euery man were for himselfe, and his priuat commoditie. Which if it might be granted, then a man of credit might take vp money enough at interest to [Page 39] buy vp a whole commoditie, to sell it after his owne price and pleasure. The Vsurer & borrower here be safe enough; for the poore people shall pay double, and make both gai­ners. This is too plaine.

2 Next they doe imagine, that except the biting of vsu­rie be sensible and apparant, there is no iniquitie at all. But there be mysteries of iniquitie, which are not discernable to a vulgar eye at the first sight. There may be iniurie with­out damage, and damage without sense. Therefore as the holy Ghost hath expressed the sensible biting of vsurie in Neshec: so hath he forbidden that which is more secret and couered in the word Tarbith; else wherefore should Tar­bith be added vnto Neshec, both in the letter of the Law and the Prophets? either it must be added by way of an [...], to make a gradation (as if not biting vsurie onely were for­bidden, but any increase whatsoeuer;) or else it must be an [...], added by way of explication, and so of equall lati­tude with Neshec: only declaring what God meant by bi­ting vsurie, namely, any increase in that kinde whatsoe­uer.

It is the manner of holy Scripture after that a law is giuen and a sinne forbidden in a sensible terme; by the addition of a more generall terme, to expresse Gods meaning more fully; lest men should seeke libertie in restraining the for­mer terme more narrowly.

The Commandement against theft is set downe in the sensible terme of stealing: the iniquitie whereof is appa­rant and sensible, discerned at the first sight to be iniurious. But lest men should restraine the meaning of Gods law to that theft which is so sensible; the holy Ghost addeth, dea­ling Leu. 19. 11. falsely, or circumuenting: teaching thereby, that the ouer reaching of our brethren in bargaining and contracts, by any cunning and craftie dealing, is included in theft, though the iniquitie of it be not so apparant as that which is properly called stealing. In like manner, lest men desi­ring to get themselues some libertie in this sinne, should restraine Neshec vnto that palpable biting and oppression [Page 40] which hath no colour of equitie, God hath therefore added a more generall terme, forbidding all increase: adding that terme euer in the second place, as an explication of the for­mer. If any man therefore doubtfull of this branch alreadie handled, concerning the very words of Gods law, be desi­rous to resolue his owne conscience; let him frame his case aright on this manner, and he may easily resolue himselfe of the safest way. Seeing the Law and Prophets haue simplie and directly forbidden vsury, vnder the proper termes both of biting, and increase: and seeing on the other side, that vsu­rie is a delicate gaine desired of many; the question is no more but this, whether we should labour by distinction to restraine the words of God to our desires, that wee might practise some moderate vsurie: or endeuour to conforme our desires to the words of God, that wee might keepe a safe conscience.

§. 3.

The second exception is personal. We are forbidden (say they) to take vsurie of the poore, but not of the rich; for so Exod. 22. 15. runneth the text: If thou lend money to my people, that is, to the poore, thou shalt not be as an Vsurer vnto him, thou shalt not oppresse him. Againe, If thy brother be impouerished or fal­len into decay, thou shalt take no vsurie of him. Whereupon they would inferre, therefore of the rich thou maist take.

These two answers be current in euery ones mouth. First, that God for bad onely biting vsurie. Next, that wee must not lend vpon vsurie to the poore. Are we forbidden then to bite the poore only? and is it lawfull to bite the rich? If thou lend money to my people, that is, to the poore, thou shalt not be a Noshec vnto him; that is, a biting Vsurer. Maist thou then be Exod. 22. 15. a Noshec, a biting Vsurer to the rich?

See then how vnsutable these conceits are, that one ouer­throweth another. Is it onely biting and oppressing vsurie which Gods law forbiddeth? then surely there is no re­spect of persons, we must not bite or wrong any, be he rich or poore.

But what is their reason, why wee may lend vpon vsurie [Page 41] to the rich? because there is mention of the poore only in the text, therefore it is likely the rich are not meant. It is true the poore are mentioned, and for that God saw great reason, because they be most likely to borrow, and readiest to be oppressed. And in the wildernesse where this law was giuen, there was none borrowed but only for need: there­fore are the poore only mentioned.

Immediatly before this law of vsurie in Exod. 22. 22. is there a law for widowes and fatherlesse children: Thou shalt not trouble any widow, or fatherlesse child. Doth it therefore follow that thou maist trouble a maried woman, or a childe that hath a father? This Logick were no good Diuinitie: those are named onely which are most subiect to oppres­sion. Yet this difference is vrged by the most learned of them, who seeme any waies to fauour vsurie: Caluin. E­pist. de vsu­ra. Quiamelius potest carere abs (que) damno: Because the rich cannot feele the biting so well; he may spare it better then the poore. If this were good reasoning, what sport might theeues and rob­bers make with Salomons words; Prou. 22. 22. Thou shalt not robbe the poore, because he is poore? Therefore we may robbe the rich because he is rich, and may well spare it.

Obserue further in the very text, as if God of purpose would preuent this cauill. In Deuteronomie there is no mention of the poore at all, but the Law is deliuered in ge­nerall termes, Deut. 23. 19. Thou shalt not giue vpon vsurie to thy bro­ther, but to the stranger thou maist. There is no limitation or toleration to any, but only to the stranger. If he be thy bro­ther thou maist not take vsurie of him. Is not the rich thy brother, as well as the poore?

Adde moreouer, that as when the Law was giuen, there was none that borrowed but only the poore vpon necessi­tie: so afterwards in the Ezek. 18. 13. 17. Cha. 22. 12 Psal 15. 5. Prou. 28. 8. Prophets, when there might bee vsurie among the rich also, there is no mentiō of the poore: but vsurie is absolutely forbidden without respect of per­sons. If the law of God should extend no further then to the persons mentioned at the first giuing of it, wee should make it very defectiue. For being giuen in the wildernesse [Page 42] before the peaceable establishing of Common-weales or king domes, it was then directed vnto particular families, Exod. 20. Honour thy father and thy mother: yet by vertue of these words, doe Kings and Emperours of due challenge obe­dience, though at the first giuing of the Commandement there was neither King nor Emperour in Israel. So likewise though the poore only were mentioned at the first, because none but they did then borrow, notwithstanding this in­tent of the law is to be extended, euen as vsurie shall extend it selfe to all persons whatsoeuer.

Last of all, it shall appeare that there may be as vnlaw­full and as biting vsurie in lending to the rich, because he is rich; as to the poore, because he is poore. Therefore perso­nall difference cannot distinguish lawfull and vnlawfull v­surie.

Because thou wilt not oppresse the poore, thou wilt lend thy moneys to a rich Merchant, who shall take no hurt, but gaine largely both for himselfe and thee. I demaund then to what end doth he borrow, being of so sufficient wealth? Forsooth that hee may compasse greater matters then his owne stock will reach vnto. I aske then, what warrant there is in equitie and conscience, either for him to borrow, or thee to lend?

If God hath blessed him with a stocke of his owne, by which he may liue in good fashion, shall hee out of a coue­tous and vaine humour to become a Royall Merchant, reach beyond his reach? Let him plough with his owne heifer, and Pro. 5. 15 drinke of the water of his owne well: else he bewraieth a couetous and ambitious minde, contrary to the Apostles rule: Heb. 13. 5 Be content with those things which you haue. He temp­teth God in ventring more then his owne: whereas a Chri­stian mans resolution should be, that whatsoeuer befalleth, though Iobs calamitie fall vpon him, yet so neere as he can, hee should lose no more then his owne. Gods law did in­tend that none should borrow but for need. A rich man, I confesse, may need vpon occasion, and thou maist lend him freely to receiue the like courtesie from him another time: [Page 43] but to lend him that hee may get double or trebble gaine for thee and himselfe, with thy wealth (who perhaps is of Master Dr. Wil­son, fol. 5. Gromelgainer his opinion, who thought in his con­science that a Merchants gaine is not to be stinted;) to lend to such a one, I say, is to feed a greedie and ambitious mind in another, for which thou standest answerable; because thy money if it come to thee on Gods name, is Gods bles­sing, and God hath made thee a steward of his blessings; thou must therefore giue an account, when thou giuest vp thy stewardship, how thy money hath been imployed.

Lend not then to the rich, because he is rich. For as to lend him freely is no charitie, because he needs it not; so to lend him vpon vsury is no equitie, because thou dost there­by enable, yea and incourage him the more to fat himselfe by feeding vpon the Common-wealth: who will bee sure with thy money to pay thy vsurie; to bee a sweete gainer himselfe, and to supply all by-losses besides, or he will want of his will.

It was not therefore the meaning of God in his law to make any such personall limitation of lending to the poore only, seeing that by this kind of loane euen to the rich also, there may be biting and oppression in great measure: which cases though they be not essentiall to the act of vsurie, yet are they sufficient to demonstrate that the personall diffe­rence of poore and rich, doth make no reall distinction be­twixt lawfull and vnlawfull vsurie; which is to the purpose of this second exception.

Let vs see further if there bee any other shift which the wit of man hath deuised to auoid this law of God. For nei­ther of these two can stand by it self: and if we ioyne them together one ouerthroweth another. For shall wee sticke close to Neshec, and condemne only biting vsury, as if there were some which did not bite? Then must wee respect no persons, but giue ouer this distinction of poore and rich: for verely we must bite none.

§. 4.

A third exception is reall, against the obligation of the [Page 44] law it selfe. For that which is chiefly pressed, by Molineus and his fellowes in this assertion, is this: That vsurie is no further forbidden by that law of God in Moses, then it is oppo­site to the rules of iustice and charitie. Which we doe grant them most freely. For no more is theft, adulterie, murther, or any other transgression of the second table forbidden any otherwise, then as it standeth in opposition to iustice and charitie. For charitie (saith the Apostle) is the fulfilling Rom. 13. 10. of the law.

So that whosoeuer transgresseth the law, transgresseth iustice or charitie; though not all alike, nor in the same de­gree of euidence to be discerned; but some more obscure­ly then other: which thing begetteth so many difficult ca­ses of iustice in lawes, and of conscience in Diuinitie. A­mongst which this case of vsurie is not the least, because the iniquitie of it cannot so easily be discerned, as of theft and bare faced robberie, whose malice and iniustice doth open it selfe to the first sight. And that vsurie is a thing in it selfe inordinate, and so consequently opposite to iustice and charitie both, shall be more fully expressed when we come to the arguments drawne from those places. But our pre­sent businesse in this Chapter is to deale with the very text of Scripture, the written law of God.

Their meaning then who would patronize vsurie is this: that Gods expresse law against it is not morall binding Christians; but iudiciall or politike only, framed peculiar­ly for that Common-wealth of the Iewes. Which conceit likewise ouerthroweth that former distinction of biting vsurie: for if God in that law doe forbid biting and oppres­sing vsurie only, then is that law morall binding Christians as well as Iewes: except they would muzzle the Iewes, and giue Christians libertie to bite and oppresse their brethren. These groundlesse conceits are built likewise with vntem­pered morter, they ouerthrow one another and them­selues.

When wee looke into the consent of Interpreters, wee shall finde no question made, but the law against vsurie is [Page 45] morall and as binding as may be. Looke into the Prophets, and they euer combine this sinne of vsurie with the trans­gressions of the Morall law in the highest degree, with ly­ing, backbiting, deceit, wrong, briberie; Psalme 15. with Idola­trie, oppression, adulterie, crueltie, vnmercifulnesse to the poore, bloodshed and murther: Ezek. 18. with the profanation of ho­ly things; with the abomination of vncleannes; with the vn­naturall sinnes of incest, Ezek. 22. Ʋsurie (saith S. [...]. Supplem. vers. 14. Basil) is placed among the greatest abominations; all of them trans­gressions of the Morall law.

It is true indeed there is a iudiciall and politique tolera­tion annexed vnto this law, Deut. 23. 20. that the lewes might take vsu­rie of strangers; but that maketh not the law it selfe iudicial, but rather morall. The Iewes had a diuorce permitted vnto them Deut. 24. 1. in the same book of Moses, the next chapter, and yet the 7. Commandement, to which that belongeth, is mo­rall notwithstanding: In like manner the Iewes might take vsurie of strangers, which was a peculiar toleration for that nation, yet the law against vsurie is morall.

Of which peculiar permission there was speciall cause: whether we take it for all strangers in generall, or for the Cananites and those who dwelt among them in parti­cular.

1. If it was lawfull for Iewes to exact vsurie of all stran­gers that were not Iewes, that was permitted of God, as a wise lawgiuer to preuent the greater oppression of his own Church and people. For if the Iewes had not had power to haue made their part good with the wicked Gentiles, the Gentiles would haue eaten vp Gods people.

Besides, such was the hardnes of Iewish hearts, that if they might not haue taken vsurie of strangers, they also would haue made a pray euen of their owne brethren. Which toleration in ciuill respects might absolue the Iewes in the externall Court, but not in the Court of Conscience; no more then the toleration of diuorce did dispense with that Mar. 10. 5 hardnes of their hearts before God.

2. If by stranger in that toleration bee meant onely the [Page 46] remnant of the Cananites, as Lib. de To­bia, cap. 15. S. Ambrose and Lib. 6. in Ezek. 18. Hierome a­mong the ancient, Iunius and Tremellius of latter time haue expounded it: then is there a more speciall reason of it, that they might deuoure them by peece meale, whom they could not ouercome at once. Whereupon saith S. Ambrose, Lib. de To­bia, cap. 15. Ab hoc vsuram exige, quem non sit crimen occidere: Thou maist lawfully take vsurie of him, whom thou maist lawful­ly kill.

Now when the Cananites were once suppressed, we find all vsurie euer after simply forbidden without any such li­mitation. So the Hebrews vnderstood the 15. Psalme, as if it were vnlawfull for a Iew in Dauids time to take vsurie of any Gentile. Which In Exod. 22. 15. Lyranus reporteth to be the opinion of Rabbi Salomon, and which De arca­nis Cathol. veritat. lib. 11. c. 4. P. Galatinus noteth to be the iudgement of the Rabbines in generall. To which asser­tion S. Hierome vpon Ezekiel subscribeth: Lib. 6. in Ezek. In the beginning of the law vsurie is forbidden towards thy brethren, in this Pro­phet towards all.

Which speciall permission of lending to a stranger (be it Cananite or stranger in generall, which for the present con­clusion I leaue as a thing indifferent) doth rather confirme that law whereto it belongeth to bee morall, then other­wise; and so consequently vsurie to be simply vnlawfull. For lawfull things haue no need of permission.

Last of all, let that permission of lending to a stranger passe as nothing concerning Christians, because the parti­tion wall being taken away, we are all brethren: and then the question for the interpretation of the law dependeth chiefly vpon this point, how farre that law of Moses against vsurie did binde the Iewes among themselues?

If all increase aboue the principall then was simply for­bidden to the Iewes, as is granted by them who make this exception; I demaund what warrant Christians haue in as­suming greater libertie herein vnto themselues, then was granted vnto the Iewes? Our Christian libertie I confesse is much greater then theirs was for rites and ceremonies, which were shadowes of things then to come, as the Apo­stles [Page 47] doe warrant vs. But for matter of equitie and charitie among brethren, God did vse more toleration and con­niuencie towards them, then he doth toward Christians, of right looking for more fruite at our hands then theirs, in regard of that Gospell of grace which we doe enioy.

If that vsurie alone which hath a Neshec or oppression in it was forbidden in the Law, as opposite to the rules of iu­stice and charitie, then was not that law iudiciall or pecu­liar for the Iewes, but obligatorie and standing in as full force and vertue amongst Christians, as euer it did amongst them.

So that grant them whatsoeuer they will demaund, let them winde themselues which way they list, yet the law of God maketh strong against them both in letter and sense, condemning all vsurie for a sinne.

§. 5.

As vsurie is a sinne in it selfe by the censure of the text, so is it branded by the holy Ghost for a sinne of that nature and degree which doth make shipwrack of conscience: the continuance of which sinne cannot stand with the grace and fauor of God. For God hath in his law noted this sin, a­mongst others, with some special marks of impiety, & hath sealed his law against vsury with his owne signet and great seale. The same motiue which God vseth by way of preface for the keeping of all his Commandements of both tables, he hath singled cut and annexed it to this law against vsu­rie: Thou shalt not giue him thy money to vsurie, nor lend him Leu. 25. 38. thy victuals for increase. I am the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, &c. And againe, Thou vers. 36. shalt not take vsurie of him, nor aduantage, but thou shalt feare thy God. As if vsurie and the feare of God could not stand together. Ezechiel also concluding all the abominations therein mentioned with vsurie, hee sealeth it vp with that fearfull censure, Shall he liue? he shall not liue, he shall die the Ezek. 18. 13 death, his blood shall be vpon him.

And as Dauid doth excommunicate the Vsurer out of Psal. 15. the Tabernacle of Gods Church, and depriue him of eter­nall [Page 48] rest in the holy hill; so doth his sonne Salomon menace a curse vpon his wealth so gotten, and vpon his posteritie, who hoped to haue enioyed the same. He that increaseth Prou. 28. 8. his riches by vsury and interest, gathereth thē for him that will be mercifull to the poore. That is to say, the Vsurers children shall neuer enioy them. How true that is which the pain­full Preacher Master Smith obserued concerning the chil­dren In the Ser­mon of V­surie. of such in London, who grow wealthie by interest; and that which the penitent Merchant in D. Wilson remem­breth of Vsurers issue, I leaue to them who out of longer experience can speake of that point.

Let euery one therefore who desireth to resolue his con­science for this matter by Scripture (the only true ground of a Christian resolution) let him consider, I say, how nei­ther vsurie nor interest, biting vsurie nor increase is euer once named in the booke of God, but it is condemned; condemned amongst such abominations as bring a curse in stead of a blessing: an eternall curse vpon the soule of the Vsurer, and a temporall curse vpon his wealth & posteritie.

Let some of these tender consciences, who are so vrgent to call for warrant out of the booke of God for euery cere­monie and matter of forme in the Church, seeke a warrant for this their practise, which so neerely concerneth them; and let them seeke it at the Oracle of God, who hath not left it, as he hath many other things, either to the discretion of the Church, or wisedome of Common-wealths; but hath vouchsafed to determine it in his own booke to our hands: to set downe an expresse law against it in Exodus; to renue and reuiue that law againe and againe in Leuiticus and Deuteronomie; to ratifie and confirme it with no other words then himselfe vsed at the publishing of the whole Morall law; to specifie the only limitation which he meant to tolerate for a time; to adde the promise of blessing to the keepers of this law; and to denounce such fearefull iudgements against the transgressors of the same, vpon their wealth and posteritie in this world, vpon their owne soules in the world to come.

[Page 49] Since it hath pleased the Almightie God thus fully and exactly to expresse his will for our resolution in this point; let vs not be so readie to flie from his expresse word to hu­mane inuentions; I meane those deuised distinctions which fauour the seruice of Mammon more then the seruice of God; which sauour the things that be of men, to wit, the profit, the ease, the securitie, the sweete gaine of Interest; a trade which flesh and blood must needes affect and be greatly inclined vnto.

CHAP. III. Of the testimonie of ancient Fathers.

THere be a sect of spirits in the world, who can not with patience endure to heare any au­thoritie alleaged saue onely Scripture: as if the very bare text it selfe did speake so eui­dently to their vnderstanding, that there were no neede of an Interpretour. And it falleth so out in this businesse, as it doth in few points of question besides; that I could be very well content they would retaine their opinion still, and put all Interpretors to silence; so might we spare further labour, and the question were at an end. For the text neuer mentioneth any kinde of vsurie, but with detestation, without distinction, difference, qualification; condemning it, cursing it, denouncing plague vpon plague vpon it, as vpon a sinne most odious. But see how strangely it is come about of late times, that euen those spirits which are most nice in these points, now the question is come to a matter of profit and gaine, are of all others most readie to auoid the text, by new deuised trickes and inuentions of men.

Against these let vs aske counsell of the ancient and holy Fathers of the Church. So doth God by his Prophet direct his people of that time: Ier. 6. 16. Aske for the old way which is the good way, and walke therein, and you shall finde rest for your [Page 50] soules. The way of these ancients, next to the Apostles, was the old way, and no doubt the good way, if we had grace to walke in it. We thinke our selues wiser then they; but I am sure they had more religion then we. Of this new learning for the defence of vsurie, I confesse they were altogether ignorant. Though they were fathers, yet concerning naugh­tinesse 1. Cor. 14. 20. they were children, as the Apostle wisheth them to be; they did simply and plainly take the holy Ghost as hee spake, conforming themselues to the Scriptures in this point most exactly; neuer mentioning vsurie, but condem­ning of it with so many inuectiues, as would fill a whole volume of themselues. But it shall be sufficient for vs only to giue a taste of some few, resting our selues vpon this ge­nerall obseruation, as for this point vnanswerable, that we finde not any of them which writeth of it, but writeth a­gainst it, without any mincing or qualifying of the mat­ter.

If wee reuerence the iudgement of reuerend men, both for their learning and sanctimonie of life, let vs begin with that ancient holy Father, who hath fully expressed himselfe for this point: S. Basil the great, that little sparke of Religion, as In Epist. ad Basil. Nazianzen calleth him, left alone in the East, when all true professors seemed to be extinct.

In his Supplement vpon the 15. Psalme he taketh this point in hand, grounding his censure first vpon the Law and Prophets, which in his vnderstanding doe cleerely sorbid vsurie, and account it amongst the most hamous transgres­sions. To exact of the poore which borroweth for neede is inhumane; yet such inhumanitie was practised in his daies. Which thing though it be not the point now in question, yet the relation which that Father maketh of it, doth dire­ctly strike at the nature of all vsurie whatsoeuer. Take Sa­lomons rule (saith Basil to the borrower:) drinke of the waters of thine owne well, sell thy cattell, thy plate, thy household stuffe, thy apparell, sell any thing rather then thy libertie. Worthily is vsurie termed [...], (as the same Father conti­nueth his speech) for it breedeth and bringeth forth so ma­ny [Page 51] mischiefes one in the necke of another: an vnnaturall brood, like the generation of vipers, which eateth through the entrals of the mother. An vnnaturall and monstrous brood: for whereas all fruites and cattel haue their appoin­ted times to engender and bring foorth to their Lord and master; money to the Vsurer bringeth foorth to day, and beginneth a new trauell to morrow: nay that young breed which was but brought foorth to day, beginneth it selfe to beare to morrow. And whereas other creatures, the sooner they begin to beare, the sooner do they leaue off; Money by vsurie beginneth betimes, & increaseth without end. Come not therefore vnder the slauerie of this monster. Thou hast hands, thou hast some calling; doe somewhat and liue ac­cordingly. If thou bee rich, thou needst not to borrow; if thou be poore, borrowing will not relieue thee. Wouldest thou renue Sampsons riddle, Out of the eater came meate? Wouldest thou gather grapes of thornes? The thornes will wound and pearce thee: thou falst into the hands of those [...]. monethly diuels, which follow the course of the Moone to afflict poore men with a foule ill or falling sicknesse. Thus and much more fully to this purpose hath that learned Father written, dehorting all men poore and rich from bor­rowing in this kinde, inueighing ouer bitterly against Vsu­rers, not only for their greedie crueltie against their poore debtors, but for liuing vpon so vnnaturall and vnkinde in­crease as vsurie is. Dogs, monsters, vipers, diuels? This is too harsh. But wee must beare with him; if hee liued, as they write hee did, most vpon bread and salt, may bee it was his humour to giue such drie and sharpe censure vpon the mo­ney-mongers of his time.

Let vs see then what S. Chrysostome thought, who hath taken great paines in this point; his golden mouth, wee hope, will vtter no such bitternes.

He lamenteth much the estate of the Church in his time, In Matth. Hom. 57. Grauis (de­lectissimi) morbus, &c. for that so grieuous a disease as vsurie is, was then fallen vp­on it: yet they were very charitable Vsurers in his time; for their ordinarie excuse was, Foeneratus sum, sed pauperi ob­tuli; [Page 52] I haue taken vsurie, but I haue giuen it to the poore. But God (saith Chrysostome) is not delighted with such sacrifices; thou hadst better not giue at all then giue such almes. Doe not you your selfe count vsurie sordide? Doe not the lawes forbid Senators and publike persons to defile themselues with such filthie lucre? This law against vsurie (saith the same Father) was giuen to the Iewes in the be­ginning, Homil. 41. in Genes. when they were but rude, that they should not take vsurie of their brother; how can Christians then be excused who shew lesse humanitie to their brethren then Iewes, and are found worse in time of grace then the Iewes were vnder the law?

The author of the vnfinished worke vpon Matthew, Homil. 12. though it be not Chrysostomes, yet agreeth with him in this; that while vsurie seemeth to giue, it taketh; while it seemeth to succour, it oppresseth; while it deliuereth from one bond, it in­wrappeth in many. It luls men asleepe like the poyson of aspes, and as leuen it conuerteth the whole substance of man into his owne nature, that is, into debt.

For Clemens Strom. [...]. 2. Alexandrinus, for Epist. ad Lato. Greg. Nyssen. for [...]. Gre­gor. Nazianz. &c. it will be sufficient onely to gather their voyces; because they did but taste and spit out.

§. 2.

If wee looke Westward, Lib. 4. cont. Mar­cion. Tertullian doth but touch it, and reiect it. De vero cultu l. 6. cap. 18. Lactantius saith, It corrupteth the benefit of loane, against charitie; it taketh that it neuer gaue, against iu­stice: and a righteous man will neuer be polluted with such gaine, but will euer haue his lending to be reckoned amongst his good deedes. Lib. de Tobia ca. 12 S. Ambrose saith, There is nothing more hor­rible then an Vsurer; he is an odious man, and his money is a viper. In conclusion, he vseth this argument against it: Si li­citum, est cur vocabulum refugis? cur velamen obtexis? Si il­licitum, est cur incrementum requiris? If vsurie be lawfull, why doest thou auoid the name? why doest thou put a vaile ouer it? If it be vnlawfull, why doest thou receiue any in­crease?

If wee desire S. Augustine his iudgement for this point, [Page 53] (who is in stead of many) hee is so confident that he appea­leth to the Vsurers themselues, who practised in his daies: In Psalm. 36. Quam detestabile sit, quam odiosum, quam execrandum, pu­to & ipsi foeneratores norunt: How detestable a thing it is to giue money vpon vsurie, how odious, how execrable, I sup­pose the Vsurers themselues are not ignorant.

But hee might happely speake of some excessiue vsurie, or extortion. Obserue therefore how presently hee explai­neth himselfe in the very same place: Si aliquid plus quam dedisti expectes accipere, foenerator es & in hoc improbandus: If thou looke to receiue any thing more then thou gauest, thou art an Vsurer, and therein to be condemned.

The common obiection which is made for vsurie in the behalfe of such as haue a stock of money and not skill to vse it; is answered by the same Father somewhat sharply: Au­dent In Psalm. 128. etiam foeneratores dicere, non habeo vnde viuam; hoc mi­hi & latro diceret deprehensus in fauce: hoc mihi & effractor diceret deprehensus circa partetem alienum: hoc mihi & leno diceret, emens puellas ad prostitutionem: hoc mihi & maleficus diceret, incantans mala, & vendens malitiam suam: The Vsu­rers also (saith he) dare say they haue not else whereon to liue: so may the robber say, taken in the theeues haunt: so may the burgler say, catched vnder another mans wall: so may the bawd say, who buyeth young women for prostitu­tion: and so may the witch say, inchanting mischiefe, and selling euen malice for money. His finall sentence is, Ad Ma­cedon. & Habet. 14 q. 4. Can. Quid dicam. That Vsurers belong not to the Church of God.

Shall wee descend any further? Leo the Great is well worth the noting: De ieiu­nio. 10. mensis. seim. 6. Quilibet sequatur euentus, mala semper est ratio foenerantis, vt aut miser sit amittendo quod dedit, aut miserior accipiendo quod non dedit. Multiplicatur quidem facultas iniustis & tristibus incrementis, sed mentis substantia contabescit; quoniam foenus pecuniae funus animae: What euer the euent be, bad is the condition of the Vsurer: for the wretch shall either lose that he gaue, or be more wretched in taking that he gaue not. His substance indeed is multi­plied by vnlawfull and wofull increase, but the substance [Page 54] of the inward man dieth. For monies interest is the soules funerall: a dead soule, dead and buried in sinne is the soule of the Vsurer.

Let me conclude with deuout Epist. 322. ad Spiren­ses. S. Barnard: Taceo quod sicubi desunt Iudaei, peius Iudaizare dolemus Christianos foe­neratores. Si tamen Christianos, & non magis baptizatos Iu­daeos conuenit appellare. He writeth with griefe that which willingly he would conceale; That if Iewes were any where wanting, Christian Vsurers did play the Iewes worse then themselues. If it be fit (saith he) to call them Christians, and not rather baptized Iewes.

So farre were these holy learned Fathers from modera­ting or qualifying this practise of vsurie, that whensoeuer any of them doe meete with it, they sharpen their pens as if their spirits were moued and stirred in them more then or­dinarie. Verely they discerned some malignant and venom­full qualitie in vsurie, which opposed it selfe vnto that spi­rit by which they wrote.

CHAP. IIII. Of the later times of ignorance.

AS the bodie is proportionable to the head, so is the mysticall bodie of Christ confor­mable to himselfe, especially in his passion. For as the Church shall be like him in glo­rie, so must she be likewise in suffering. As Christ therefore had first a bloodie and then a cloudie pas­sion, when Mat. 27. 45. darknesse was vpon the earth, from the sixth houre to the ninth: so after those bloodie persecutions of the pri­mitiue Church were ouer, that she grew from peace to se­curitie, she was strangely eclipsed with ignorance and blindnes; a mist of darknesse was vpon her; during which time notwithstanding many points of moralitie, especiallie this against vsurie, did continue and retaine their former in­tegritie. Which I must ascribe especially vnto two causes.

[Page 55] 1. First, the doctrine concerning workes of charitie was very well preserued & vehemently inforced in those times; because it was a profitable doctrine by which the Church did thriue and grow full. Therefore they would be sure to keepe out those sinnes which strike so directly at Charitie, as Vsurie doth; like that cambium siccum, which drieth vp the very roote of charitie and equitie.

2. Secondly, the Fathers of the Church by their inue­ctiues, in former times, had made such an impression in the mindes of Christians against vsurie, that in time it grew so odious and detestable, as it was no fit time for the diuell to bring in that sinne, vnlesse it came very cunningly disgui­sed: in so much as Centur. 12. 4. Petrus Can­tor. there was scarse one Vsurer to be found in a whole citie. Neither would hee practise but by secret stipulation, and protestation, that he should not be discoue­red. If he were but suspected (as in time hee must needs be) his house was called the Diuels house; and so euery thing he possessed; the Diuels field, the Diuels vineyard, the Diuels pit. Not any of his neighbours would communicate with him, so farre foorth as to fetch fire at his house. The chil­dren in the streetes were scared at the sight of him, as if some bu [...]begger had passed by: running aloofe they would point at him with the finger, that others might know him, as if some strange monster were to bee seene.

When after in processe of time the practise of it grew more common among Christians; yet the learned amongst them would giue most hard censure vpon Vsurers in their writings & preachings. Petrus Blesens. Epist. 131. Foenerator tristissimos habet exitus huius vitae: cuius mors detestabilis, cuius finis interitus, cuius damnatio sine fine: Most wofull is the passage of the Vsurer out of this life; whose death is detestable, whose end is damnation, whose damnation is without end.

The schoole Diuines of both houses are cleerely against vsurie; vsurie of all sorts. The Thomists and Scotists haue no quarrell at all for this question.

It were extreame follie to blot paper in the alleaging of [Page 56] particulars, there is not any of them but doth absolutely condemne all vsurie as simply vnlawfull. Where obserue how the most acute and subtill wits of those times, who did set themselues to coyne distinctions, and to finde out most exact differences of things; who were able to dart an argu­ment, as the mē of Gibeah did stones, Iudg. 20. 16. it an haires breadth; yet were neuer so quick sighted (as some in these daies be) to spie out that case, wherein vsurie is lawfull.

CHAP. V. Of Councels.

WE haue taken a briefe view of the iudge­ment of the learned thus farre, and in them of the Church: wherein we find a full consent and harmonie without any iarre at all. But as Almightie God Gen. 1. 31. (after his particular reuiew of each daies worke, wherein hee saw it was good) did at the last take a more generall reuiew of the whole frame of heauen and earth, and then saw that it was very good: So if wee take a generall view of the Church as­sembled in Councels, we shall finde that this wee haue said is very true.

What the Church did take vsurie to be, is defined in the Councell of Agatha vnder Symmachus. Ʋsura est vbi am­plius Tom. 2. pag. 308. requiritur quam datur: When any thing more was re­ceiued then was deliuered, as the Councell giueth instance in money and corne.

The first Councell of Nice decreed against it: Sanctum & magnum concilium iuste statuit, vt si quis inuentus fuerit Can. 18. post hanc definitionem vsuram accipiens, abijciatur à Clero, & alienus à Canone sit. And Clergie men were neuer degraded but for deadly sinne.

The first Councell of Carthage held it filthie lucre.

The Elibertin Councell degraded the Clergie, and ex­communicated Can. 12. Can. 20. [Page 57] the Laitie for the same.

But the Lateran Councell vnder Alexander the third Can. 1. was most bitter; who when question was made by Panor­mitan an Archbishop, whether vsurie might not be dispen­sed withall for the redemption of poore Christians taken captiue by the Saracens; returned this answere: Praesenti­bus tibi literis duximus respondendum: Quod cum vsurarum crimen vtriusque testamenti pagina detestatur, super hoc dis­pensationem aliquam non vidimus admittendam: That since both old and new Testament hath made vsurie detestable, no dispensation was to be admitted, no not for the redee­ming of Christian captiues.

It was decreed in the same Councell, that manifest Vsu­rers Ibid Saler­mitano E­piscop. should bee depriued of the communion and fellowship of Christians in their life, and of Christian buriall after death, till their heires had restored their vsurie.

Alexander explaneth it further, that such restitution was to be made to their heires, if they were dead; if heires were not to be found, it went to the poore.

The Councell of Vienna vnder Clement the 5. condem­ned all for Heretikes who held vsurie to be lawfull.

By this that briefly hath been said, wee may gather what hath been the sentence and censure of the Church both in her time of puritie, as also since the time that by long stan­ding still, she had gathered corruption.

It remaineth now that wee examine how farre she hath been purged and reformed concerning this point of vsurie, by our later Diuines.

CHAP. VI. Of the testimonie of Diuines in reformed Churches.

IF there be any hope for vsurie, now wee are come vnto it. Men care not much for antiquitie, if noueltie will helpe them to so easie and sweete a gaine.

Let vs begin with Luther, and see In Psal. 15. what hee findeth worthie of reforma­tion in this point. Now wee must re­member that in his time there was crept into the Church a cunning kinde of masked vsurie allowed of by the Pope, termed contractus redemptionis, a bargaine and sale with couenant of redemption, if the money be paid back againe at such a day. The toleration whereof is by him made a note of Antichrist. Nec sic tamen adesse Antichristum vllus credit: He was angrie with the world that men would not beleeue the Pope to be Antichrist, for toleration of a little spice of vsurie. So farre was Luther from fauouring of it. But wee haue very wisely of later times left out this note. And surely if wee had no greater matters to lay to the charge of the Pope, then toleration of vsurie, I thinke wee should yet looke for another Antichrist.

Melancthon proueth expressely, that what gaine soeuer is Definitio­nes appella­tionum. demanded for meere loane, is simply forbidden in Leuiticus and Deuteronomie; that it is directly repugnant to equalitie and iustice; that it doth exhaust men where it is vsed; that the cloaking of it vnder the name of honest interest, is a meere so­phistication.

That worthie writer Chemnitius hath written a large trea­tise Loco de paupert. cap. 6. in his Common places against vsurie, answering al their arguments and cauillations, shewing what cold comfort it is for a conscience to relie vpon new deuised distinctions, against such expresse & generall prohibitions of Scripture.

[Page 59] Aretius vrgeth the same point not only out of Moses and Problem. de vsura. Luk. 6. 35. the Prophets, but as simply forbidden by Christ, Lend, loo­king for nothing againe. Vnderstanding it not of the princi­pall, but of increase, because of the word [...] as if it were not a lending but a free beneficence, if the principall were not to be expected. Howsoeuer that place may be subiect Illud tamē certum est, multò ma­gis prohibe­ri foenerato­rias pactio­nes. Beza in annotat. Luc. 6. 25. Supplem. in Psal. 15. to other interpretation; yet by many pregnant proofes be­sides doth he absolutely condemne vsurie. And albeit Beza differ from him in expounding that text; yet euen from that text doth Beza condemne vsurie.

Musculus likewise dischargeth his conscience against all vsurie, euen that of Orphants. But with little hope of a­mendment; for his conclusion is, that Diuines shall reforme vsurie, when Physitians haue cured the gowte. Both are vncu­rable; this as great a sinne, as that a disease, and will one day racke the conscience, as that doth the sinowes, if it be not preuented in time.

What should I speake of De puri­tate tabern. Erasmus, of In 6. Luc. Zuinglius, of Cateches. in Exod. Praecept. 8. Camerarius, of In Prophe­tas minor. Oecolampadius, of a number of others, whose very names would replenish a page, all of them sim­ply and directly against vsurie.

This hath been the generall iudgement of the Church, for aboue this fifteene hundred yeeres, without opposition, in this point. Poore sillie Church of Christ, that could ne­uer finde a lawfull vsurie, before this golden age wherein we liue.

§. 2.

But yet are wee not come to the maine point: for the Heluetian Diuines, and some of Geneua, are supposed to stand close by them, able to answere whatsoeuer can bee said against vsurie. They aske what we say of Caluin, Bucer, Iunius, Zanchie, Hemingius, and others of that ranke? Wee say they were as worthie Diuines as euer the Church en­ioyed, since it enioyed them. But the question is, what these haue said of vsurie.

Let vs take a taste of the principall of these, vpon whom Vsurers doe chiefly relie as vpon their chiefe patron. Ma­ster [Page 60] Caluin hath said much of it: yea and by their leaues, much against it. Writing vpon the 18. of Ezechiel: Certe foenerator semper erit latro: hoc est, qui quaestum faciet ex foe­nore ille predo erit: Certainly (saith Caluin) an Vsurer will euer be a theefe: that is, he who will be a gainer by vsurie will be a spoyler. This is an vnkinde salutation. But hee said as he thought: for vpon 15. Psalme he thinketh, there is scarse an honest man of an Vsurer to be found in the whole world. Moreouer, he saith where he writes most fauoura­bly: In repub. bene constituta nemo foenerator tolerabilis est, Epist. de vsura. sed omnino debet è consortio hominum reijci: An Vsurer (saith Caluin) is not tolerable in a well established Common-weale, but vtterly to bee reiected out of the companie of men. Certè foenerare quaestus est illiberalis & indignus homi­ne tam pro quam honesto: Verely (saith he) to play the Vsu­rer is an illiberall gaine, and vnworthie either a godly or an honest man. But stay, is this the great patron of vsurie? Surely I would wish all Vsurers to blesse themselues from such patrons. Our next enquirie then will be, what is to be found in these mens writings, which hath giuen such in­couragement to the Vsurers of our time.

CHAP. VII. Of their assertion who haue most fa­uoured Vsurie.

HAd it not been for those banished men, who in time of persecution fled into those parts for succour, this doctrine against vsurie had neuer been called into question. But these exiles bringing stocks of money with them, and wan­ting skill to imploy it in those strange places; it was pitie they should haue been driuen to haue spent vpon the stocke: [Page 61] therefore their money was vsed by others who had skill, and some allowance made to them for the vse. This pra­ctise growing both common and publike, it remained then that the wit of man out of a tender commisera­tion towards those who suffered exile for Religion, must trie what it could doe, if not directlie to defend, yet somewhat to qualifie the matter. Thus pitie brought in practise, and practise must seeke apologie: Humanum est. But what apologie hath it found? I finde that these Diuines deale with vsurie, as the Apothecarie doth with poyson, working and tempering it with so many cau­tions and limitations, that in the end they make it no vsu­rie at all.

Let vs begin with Master Caluin, who in this point mo­ueth the rest of the planets; though not as Luther was wont to doe before him; who like the primum mobile carried all by violent motion: but Caluin like the eight Sphere had certaine motions of trepidation, as in diuers points, so in this of vsurie.

Being pressed by a friend to giue answere by letter for a friend; whether vsurie be simplie vnlawfull: Good Lord, how loath hee is to bee brought to the point, doubting that his friend would catch at some word, and for an inch take an ell! Metuo ne ille verbulo quodam arrepto plus sibi multo permittat quam vellem. Optandū quidē esset omnes vsu­ras, ipsum (que) adeo nomen è mūdo iam pridē exu­lasse: et ni­hil magis exeptem quā vt mi­hi necessitas nō sit argu­mētū istud deinceps attingere. Wishing that the very name of vsurie had been long since banished the world: desiring no­thing more but that he might neuer more be vrged to speake to that point. And in conclusion, Tantū ab­est vt istud a te pro e­dicto vel axiomate haberi ve­lim, vel in eo plane ac­quiescere. admonishing his friend in any case not to relie vpon his iudgement. What might it be then that this learned man said, when he said the worst, which he was so loath to say? Nullo te­stimonio scripturae mihi cōstat vsuras om­nino dam­natas esse. Nōdū cōstat vsurā omnē esse prohibi­tam. Epist. That he was not yet by any testimonie of Scripture fully resolued that all vsurie is altoge­ther condemned.

And supposing Moses his law against vsurie to be a po­litike law only, he inferreth that Certū est durius etiā loquutos es­se prophetas de vsuris, quia nomi­natim inter Iudaeos ille inter dictae erant. doubtlesse the Prophets did speake more hardly of vsurie, because it was forbidden, espe­ciallie among the Iewes. Whereupon hee concludeth, that [Page 62] Nunc igi­tur cōcludo iudicandū de vsuris esse non ex particulari aliquo scri­pturae loco, sed tantum ex aequita­tis regula. we must not iudge of vsurie by any particular place of Scrip­ture, but only by the rule of equitie.

Where note by the way how thus much is granted. If the very text of Scripture may be iudge in this case, (as by his leaue me thinkes there is great reason that it should) then is all vsurie vtterly condemned. But if we flee from the text vnto our owne rules of equitie, and iustice, mans wit in these daies can spin out fine subtill cobweb cases, where­in iniquitie shall hardly bee discerned; and then forsooth some kinde of vsurie may perhaps seeme to bee somewhat equal. Yet for all that Master Caluin will not venture to de­fend any case, except these rules following be very Exactè e­nim atten­dere hic o­portet. Epist. pre­cisely kept.

1. The first, which hee propoundeth by way of preface to his conditions, is, that a man must make no custome or Non proba­tur si quis vsurariam quasi ar­tem, &c. Epist. trade of it: once or twice and vse it not. As S. Hierome saith of play and sport: Hoc potes facere, sed hoc non est opus tuum: We must not spend our life in sport; so saith Master Caluin, make a liuing of vsurie.

2. The second is, Ne exigatur ab egente: It must not be taken of the needie, or such as be vrged to borrow vpon necessitie.

3. The third, that thou be not so addicted to gaine, but that thou be still readie furnished, and willing to furnish thy poore neighbour in his need, freely.

4. Fourthly, that the rule of Christ be euer thy touchstone, to deale no otherwise then thou wouldest be dealt with in the like case.

5. The fifth condition is, that the borrowers gaine be so Tantūdem aut plus. much more, at the least, as thy interest commeth vnto.

6. The sixt is, that not only a respect be had to the borrower, Quid expe­diat reip. but to the good of the Common-weale also, that that receiue no preiudice. If he cut a few more such shreds, hee will leaue but small lawfull vsurie behinde.

7. The last is worst of al for English Vsurers, to wit, that we neuer exceed the stint set downe in the Country or Common-weale where we liue. For our Satute now in force forbiddeth [Page 63] euen the least increase aboue the principall; our law ap­proueth none, but condemneth all; it suffereth none, but 13. Elize­beth pre­amble. punisheth all; yet with a difference, by the forfeiture of the interest, if it be vnder ten in the hundred: if it be aboue, it is then punishable by the forfeiture of principall and all. Caluin therefore (if we take in his limitations and lay them together that we mistake him not) will relieue vs very little, euen where he is most fauourable.

And because In Epist. ad Eph. 48. Zanchie, who is held another great patron of Vsurers, doth vndertake to set downe the true meaning of Caluin, Bucer, and others that wrote before him in fa­uour of vsurie, let vs heare what vsurie that is, which they meant.

It is lawfull to couenant for lucre, but vnder a condition, ei­ther expressed in the couenant, or kept in minde: that if it ap­peare the borrower shall gaine little or nothing, thy vsurie shall be little or nothing: and further if he lose of the principall, thou must beare part of the losse. Hoc enim postulat aequitas & cha­ritas. This is the vsurie which Zanchie defendeth, and this (saith he) was the meaning of Bucer and the rest. Yet this is nothing but a meere partnership. If the lender take part of losse as well as of gaine, it is no vsurie.

If any exception be to be taken to this assertion, it is to those words: Sed sub conditione vel expressâ vel tacitâ; at (que) in mente pij creditoris confirmatâ: As if the bonds might runne for the best securitie of the Creditor, to preuent fraud in the debtor: prouided that hee neither exact the bonds, nor intend to exact them: and where there is neither exe­cution in the act, nor intention in the heart, there seemeth to be no poyson of sinne, the serpent is without a sting. So that vpon the point Zanchie will gine a man leaue to be an Vsurer in parchment, but not in heart: to couenant for his best securitie, yet neuer intend to execute his couenant. But this, me thinks, is too too cunning, plaine dealing were the best. Verily God would haue vs both to be as we seeme, and to see me as we be. For, as for a bad man to bee good in shew, is hypocrisie; so for a good man to bee bad in [Page 64] 1. Thess. 5. 22. appearance, is scandalous and offensiue.

It is great reason, I confesse, that the debter should trust the charitie of the creditor, rather then the creditor should relie vpon the fidelitie of the debtor: and bonds in some cases may be lawfully made, which cannot be so lawfully exacted; as in forfeitures: exactions be commonly oppres­sions: but this is onely in case where custome doth take a­way scandall, which in such a strange deuice as this is can­not be.

Hemingius likewise after a florish made, as if he meant to defend vsurie against all arguments taken from Scripture and reason; in the end addeth a prouiso, which maketh his vsurie no vsurie. Si cui pecuniam tuam ad vsuram dedisti, spo­liatur, adeo vt ipsa quoque sors pereat, aut alioqui nihil lucre­tur: Christiani pectoris fuerit non solum sortem cum vsura remittere, verum etiam de nouo mutuum dare quo damnum acceptum resarcire possit: If by calamitie the principall pe­rish, it is the part of a Christian not only to remit principall and all, but to lend him more, that hee may recouer him­selfe: which christian dutie maketh it no vsurie, seeing the lender beareth the perill of his principall against the act of God.

§. 2.

All things therefore considered and laid together, these learned men seeme in their writings not so much to defend vsurie, as to disable some of the arguments which are vsed against it; and therein I confesse they may take some ad­uantage, which breedeth a preiudicate opinion of the truth it selfe, euen in the best learned: for as the worst enemie is a false friend, so the greatest aduersarie to a good cause, is a bad defender; for when learned men take a point in hand to examine, they will haue a speciall eye to the grounds whereupon it is builded; and if they find the foundation or groundcels vnsound, they haue great reason to suspect the building: the conclusion is not stronger then the premisses.

The force of the Philosophers argument taken from [Page 65] the barrennes of money, and the vnnaturall brood of vsu­rie, being mingled with metaphors, if it be not rightly ap­prehended, is obscure and doubtfull. That also of spending money in the first vse, as if vse and propertie were vnsepa­rable, so much stood vpon by schoole diuines, is much sub­iect to cauill: for there is sensible difference betweene spen­ding a loafe of bread, and disbursing a summe of money for gaine: for whereas a loase of bread once eaten hath no second vse at all, either to him who eat it or any o­ther; money laid out remaineth still, the same peeces to bee vsed againe by other, and the same summe in the e­quiualent to him that laid it out: and for the same in­diuiduall pecces, which once deliuered shall neuer happi­lie returne againe to the same person, there may bee some difference in a Philosophers braine, but not in a Mer­chants purse: it is all one in Commerce, whether it bee a Iames or an Elizabeth, whether it be the same shilling or as good.

Chemnitius therefore in his treatise against vsurie, doth aduise vs not to lay so much weight vpon these arguments as vpon those reasons, which are deriued from Scripture: and albeit these also haue some force in them being vrged to the right purpose (as hereafter we shall haue occasion to examine;) yet I doe verely perswade my selfe, that the very conceit of the weakenes of these grounds, hath moued ma­ny to thinke more fauourably of vsurie it selfe then there is iust cause.

Another motiue which caused these Diuines some­what to decline the beaten way in this point; was, because in detestation of vsurie some lawfull contracts also haue been condemned by some for vsurie, which doe but coast vpon it: so that the very point of difference betweene vs for the matter it selfe, doth onely concerne some cases of greater difficultie, whose equitie or iniquitie can hardly bee discerned. Cases of a mixt and midling na­ture betweene vsurie and partnership, or some like law­full contract; in which cases, if vpon examination there [Page 66] be found no iniquitie or inordinate thing, then I hope those cases shall also be found to be without the compasse of that receiued definition before expressed.

If the question then doe fall vpon some particular cases which are doubtfull, whether they be vsurious or not; I make little question but the maine point will be easilie a­greed vpon amongst the learned: That vsurie properly so called is simplie vnlawfull. I would to God the vnlearned would be as easilie perswaded to make conscience of that wherein Diuines of all churches in all ages doe accord; euen so farre as they doe accord.

CHAP. VIII. Of the testimonie of Philosophers and Historians.

THe testimony of Diuinity is sufficient to proue vsurie a sinne: yet if the light of nature be able also to discouer the same, it will aggra­uate the matter much more: there be moats which are not discerned but in the sunne­shine, as Rom. 7. 7. S. Paul saith, He had not knowne that concupis­cence had been a sinne, except the law had manifested the same: and suppose vsurie were but as a moate in the eye, yet euen that were troublesome, because the eye is tender, as the conscience of euery Christian ought to be: but if the inha­bitants of the regions of darkenes, who neuer saw this sunneshine of reuealed trueth, shall notwithstanding dis­cerne vsurie to be a thing inordinate and vicious; doubtles then it is no moate. Beames may bee discouered by the twilight of nature, and so hath vsurie euer been held euen among the heathen for a grosse enormitie.

De legib. 5 Plato in his lawes, and his scholler Politic. 1. & 7. Aristotle in his Po­liticks haue forbidden it as vnlawfull, and condemned it as vnnaturall. De re ru­stico. Cicero Offic. 2. Cato maketh it twice as bad as theft, and doth equall it with murder.

[Page 67] De Benef. 7. Seneca findeth a place for it in the calender, but not in nature. Histor. Nat. l. 33. 3 Plinie saith, it maketh idlenes it selfe fruitfull. [...]. Plutarch writeth that the vsurers doe mocke the Philoso­phers for that old principle, ex nihilo nihil fit; because they can make something of nothing: yet for all that he takes them not for Gods almightie, but tearmes them plaine di­uels; such as Plato describeth in hell to be fierie executio­ners to torment damned soules. So these cursed vsurers (saith Plutarch) being themselues turned diuels, haue turned Ibidem. the iudgement hall into hell. Were hee not a heathen man, I should be out of patience with him for making so vnchri­stian a comparison; and for laying such imputation vpon courts of Iustice. But perusing it againe, I finde how he maketh the Vsurer to cosin the lawe; for that hee writeth into his bill or booke more then he deliuered. As for the purpose, lending 100. he putteth in 110. so the lawe ta­king the vsurie to be part of the principall debt, is decei­ued; and yet must doe iustice according to the euidence of the writings in most strict manner. Besides (saith the same author) they haue sure bonds and obligations, like the chaines Ibidem. and halters which Darius sent to Athens to binde the priso­ners that should then be taken. Now if this be laid together, the comparison holdeth (very vnhappily;) for vnto a foolish man impouerished by vsurie, the iudgement place is a very hell; the law is a torment, the Vsurers obligations be euer­lasting chaines, whereout the poore soule shall neuer come till he haue paid the vttermost farthing. The Philosopher therefore in all his booke neuer directeth his speech to the Vsurer, but leaueth him as a desperate person and incorrigi­ble; aduising others to beware of him, as of some foule euill: to digge vnto the Potters earth, that is, vse all meanes of his owne, rather then borrow of him: to auoid that quag­mire (as he tearmeth him;) for if a man once begin to sinke into his bookes, he will sucke him vp like a gulfe; if he get out one legge, the other sinkes: For a borrower (quoth he) is like a horse that hath once taken the bit, he may often change his rider, but one or other Creditor is still vpon his backe. It is [Page 68] wonderfull that learned men of all ages should inueigh so bitterly against vsurie. It seemeth it is of a strange de­uouring nature, as the Hinc vsu­ra vorax auidum (que) in tempore foenus. Lucan. 1. Poet termeth it, and brings men to great extremities, when poore Aristo­phanes de nubibus. Strepsiades could deuise no better shift then the hiring of a witch to pull the Moone out of heauen, that the Vsurers moneth might neuer come about. For, [...]. Vsurie (saith the old prouerbe) is swifter then Heraclitus, time seemeth to runne so fast.

§. 2.

If vsurie then can finde no footing, neither in Diuinitie nor nature; whereupon shall it stand? Diuines would excō ­municate it out of the Church. Philosophers would proue it a monster in nature. Yet for all that it hath taken deepe roote in Common-wealths, both Heathen and Christian. Dialog. 56 Mirarer in vrbibus politicis huic flagitio locum esse, nisi esset & reliquis, &c. I would wonder (saith Petrarch) there should be any place in politike bodies for this grieuous sin, but that there is place for the rest. Whereas (saith he) infor­mer times Vsurers were separated from the companie of men; none came neere them, but such as necessitie droue vnto them; passengers would auoid them as contagious persons: now they conuerse with Princes, and attaine to places of dignitie. How pernicious Vsurers be to a Common-weale, we haue heard from the penne of the best friend that Vsurers haue. For Master Caluin saith, Epist. de vsura. He is by no meanes to be tolerated in a well gouerned Common-weale. Diuines professe little skill in State matters: but such as doe professe, haue written that Cornel. Tacit. an­nal. lib. 5. vsurie is an old venemous sore. And Bodin. de rep. lib. 5. cap. 11. other of later times inueighing against it, as the Canker, or gangrene of the Com­mon-wealth, haue condemned the Heluetians for tolerating fiue in the hundred. Tutius est vsurarum non modo radices, sed & fibras omnes amputare. It is like twichgrasse, if the least thred of a roote be left, it groweth and spreadeth without measure. The ancient Cornel. Tacit. l. 6. Romanes were wise, who seeing the mischiefe of vsurie, would tolerate by their twelue ta­bles but one in the hundred; and whosoeuer exceeded that, should be punished Cato de re rust. cap. 1. foure fold, as if he were a double theef: [Page 69] for theft by that law was punished but two fold. After this it Bodin. l. 5 cap. 11. was stinted at tenne shillings in the hundred pounds. I hope this could not bite much. Yet after by L. Genutius it was quite taken away: and breaking out againe, it was a­gaine suppressed by Tiberius Caesar, to his owne great cost, who relieued the borrowers with a banke of fiue hundred thousand pounds, of purpose to roote out Vsurers. Againe it sprouted vp, and againe was it straitly forbidden vpon the paine of the forfeiture of all goods, moueable and im­moueable, to be confiscate. What should I say more out of the experience that States haue had of this mischiefe? Centur. 15 cap. 7. Lu­douicus banished Vsurers in his time out of France. Yea and Cent. 7. cap. 7. Mahomet himselfe hath condemned it among the Turks. So carefull haue gouernours euer been amongst Heathen and Barbarians to suppresse this monster. For what Coun­trie hath vsurie been suffered in, which in time hath not rued the same? Aelian. lib. 4. cap. 1 The Indians and Germanes both were counted most happie before vsury was knowne vnto them. But what tumults it after raised in Germanie, witnesse their owne Aretij Problem. de vsura. writers. Sicilie was in great bondage by vsurie, till Cato set it at libertie. Sparta in no lesse calamitie, till Ly­curgus redeemed it. Asia ouerwhelmed with it, till Lucul­lus redressed it. All Egypt so plagued with it, that they were glad to make a law, that none should borrow vnlesse he laid his fathers corps to pawae. Athens infected with it, till Agis his bonefire (made of Vsurers bookes) had purged that Citie.

Those wise gouernours of estate when they had to deale with vsurie, methinkes they had a wolfe by the eare, which they could neither hold fast, nor let goe with safetie: the more they laboured to suppresse or stint Vsurers, the more they brake out vpon them againe; set them once at liber­tie, they deuoured the Common-weale. If England were as well cleered of these, as it is of wolues, it were so much the happier.

CHAP. IX. Of the three lawes, Canon, Ciuill, Common.

THat which the sage gouernours of State out of their wisedome and experience haue distasted as hurtfull to the socie­ties of men, both Christian and Heathe­nish; hath been also forbidden and re­strained by such lawes as be not onely compulsiue to binde succeeding ages, but directiue also to informe vs of the enormitie of this practise.

1. The Decret. part. 2. Causa 14. q. 3. c. 4. Canon Lawe hath defined vsurie to the same purpose, as is before expressed. Ibid. q. 4. c. 2. Caus. 4. 6. 7. It hath forbidden it most precisely: Institut. iuris canon. it hath punished it most seuerely, with the note of infamie, with excommunication both lesser and greater, with the depriuation of christian buriall, till actuall restitu­tion were made by the executors. L. 4. Tit. 7 de vsur. Siluest. de vsura 9. Their Willes and Te­staments were nullities in lawe; with diuers other penalties to terrifie men from vsurie, as from some horrible vice.

2. For the Ciuill lawe it cannot bee denied but it did sometime tolerate some kinde of vsurie; but neuer Bar. super l. cunctos populos summa tri­nitatis. ini­tio. allowed of it. For Codic. Iu­stinian. Iustinian in the preface wisheth that men would follow the doctrine of S. Peter; that is, of the Church, which what it was then for this point, is manifest.

To tolerate it in some sort it was forced. Saepe enim per­mittitur quod non potest corrigi aut coerceri iure ciuili: It is often permitted which cannot bee corrected or restrained by the Ciuill lawe, (saith Epist. de vsura. Caluin, a Diuine and Ciuilian both:) therefore we must make no arguments of defence from the toleration of Ciuill law, for so we might defend the Stewes and much wickednesse: Domini­cus à Soto de iustit. & iure. l. 1. q. 6. art. 2. Impune permittuntur meretricia vt adulterys obuietur, vsurae vt caueantur furta. Whether the ciuill toleration of vsurie were lawfull, is no part of our present question; but that the lawfulnes of vsu­rie cannot be proued from any toleration of lawe it is eui­dent: [Page 71] because as S. Augustine saith: Lex humana multa con­cedit, ac impunita relinquit, quae per diuinam prouidentiam Lib. 2. de Liber. arbi­trie. vindicantur: Many things must bee passed ouer by mans law, punishable by Gods hand. The law of the Lord is per­fect in this, that it forbids all faults, but mans lawe must be proportionable to mans frailtie, and giue way to many cor­ruptions; in some ages more, in some lesse. If Ciuill lawes be ouer precise without respect to the common inclinati­ons of the people, they be as new wine put into old vessels, the vessels burst, the wine is lost; such lawes shall neuer bee kept.

Notwithstanding this, wee may say (by the way) for that moderation which the Ciuill law vsed in her toleration, that as the most ancient and innocent law did tolerate the least, one in the hundred, halfe a one in the hundred, and some­times none at all: So that foenus nauticum, the most that e­uer was allowed, to wit, twelue in the hundred, was no vsurie at all, because the leader did beare the perill of the princi­pall.

3. The Common law of this land intermedleth no fur­ther with vsurie then is prouided for, and so ordained by some speciall statute; but referred it wholly to the censure of the Ecclefiasticall court, wherein a prohibition had no place: Regist. consuliat. sol. 49. Si praelati imponant poenitentiam pro peccato, & nihil aliud intentant, quod cedat in laefionem Regiae dignitatis.

But if the Vsurer died in this sin, so that the power of the Church could extend no further, because he died out of the Church: yet then euen the Common law tooke vengeance vpon him in his goods and posteritie. Randul­phus de Glanduilla, Hen. 2. lib. 7. ca. 16. Omnes res mobiles & omnia catalla quae fuerunt vsurarij mortui, ad vsus domini regis capientur, penes quemcun (que) inuenianturres illae. Haeres quoque ipsius hac eadem de causa exhaeredatur secundum ius regni, & ad dominum vel dominos reuertetur haereditas: His goods were all forfeited to the King, and his lands returned to the Lords of the see. Which was not meant of any im­moderate vsurie aboue tenne in the hundred. For the same author explaineth himselfe: Si quis aliquid tale crediderit, si [Page 72] plus co recepit vsuram facit; & si in tali crimine obierit, dam­nabitur tanquam vsurarius per legem terrae: If any shall lend any such thing, and shall receiue againe more then that hee lent, he committeth vsurie: and if he die in that crime, hee shall be condemned as an Vsurer by the law of the land. As appea­reth by the staire in Gland­uill. accor­ding to the Printer his direction 1604. This agreeth word for word with the ancient law of Scot­land, set downe in a booke called Regiam Maiestatem.

So detestable was an Vsurer in the eye of Common law, before anything was prouided by statute. Which law, if it be so ancient, as we are taught by the Sir Edw. Cooke. reuerend Iudges of the same; if so well grounded vpon the principles of reason and equitie together, with the best customes of this Coun­trie; then the ancient inhabitants of this land, led only by the light of the gloworme, shal condemne vs for this point, who reside in the sunneshine of the Gospell.

Edw 1. After, of ancient, it was enacted by the statute of Iuda­isme, forbidding all vsurie, that if a Iew lent in that kinde to a Christian, he should haue no remedie for his principall debt: yet the Christian might recouer his pawne.

Ca. 6. In the 3. of Henry 7. all cloaked vsurie was also forbid­den, vnder the termes of Ca. 5. Damnable bargaines grounded in vsurie, coloured by the name of new cheuisans, contrarie to the law of naturall iustice, to the common hurt of this land, and to the great dishonour of Almightie God. Which statute is more fully explained by Ca. 8. another made in anno 11. Hex. 7. that the said law did extend first to all lending for a time, and ta­king for the loane any thing more, besides or aboue the money lent, by way of contract or couenant made at the time of the same loane: sauing lawfull penalties for the pai­ment of the principall. 2. To the selling of goods to any person in necessitie, and buying the same againe within three moneths for a lesse summe then they were sold for. 3. To the lending of money vpon lands or bonds for the paiment thereof, with couenant to receiue the reuenues of the borrowers land, vnder paine of the forfeiture of the money, goods or merchandise so lent, or sold.

After which, in 37. of Henry 8, all former statutes con­cerning [Page 73] vsurie being repealed, the three points last before mentioned remained in force, in case the vsurie did exceed tenne in the hundred; thereby not allowing any vsurie vn­der tenne, but leauing it only vnpunished.

This law seeming ouer loose, was repealed in 5. and 6. of Ca. 20. Edward 6. wherein it was enacted, that all vsurie, increase, lucre, gaine, interest for loane, for bearing, or giuing daies of any summe of money, had, receiued, or hoped for, aboue the summe lent, giuen, set ouer, deliuered, or forborne, should be punished not only with the forfeiture of the principall and all, but with imprisonment and ransome at the Kings will and pleasure.

This law on the other side seeming too strict for an hu­mane law, was repealed in 13. Elizabeth, and the former statute of Henrie 8. reuiued, but with additions of the re­straint of vsurie. First, that all bonds, contracts and assurances 1 for any intending or doing any thing against the tenour of the said statute thus reuiued, should be vtterly void. Secondly, that 2 all brokers, solicitors and driuers of such bargaines or con­tracts, shall incurre the danger of a premunire. Thirdly, that 3 the same statute reuiued, shall be most largely and seuerely vr­ged for the suppressing of vsurie against the persons offending. Fourthly, that the Ecclesiasticall censure shall also proceed a­gainst such offenders aboue tenne in the hundred. Fiftly, Be­cause 4 5 all vsurie is forbidden by Gods law as a detestable sinne, that euery Vsurer, though he doe not exceed tenne in the hun­dred, shall forfeit so much as shall be reserued by way of vsurie aboue the principall, for any money so to be lent or forborne.

This last is the statute which England now standeth sub­iect vnto, and which wee are bound to obey by the rule of the supposed patron of vsurie: Ne excedatur modus consti­tutus Caluin. E­pist. de vsu­ra. in quauis regione. But the law of our Countrie doth not tolerate any at al, and therefore by his rule it is not law­full for vs to take any vsurie at all.

Thus much for that inartificiall argument which is taken from the testimonie of authoritie. An argument, I confesse, very inartificiall, as I haue made it: yet is the authoritie so sufficient as I would desire. Authoritie of all sorts diuine [Page 74] and humane; Ecclesiasticall and prophane; naturall and morall; of all ages, old, new, midling; of all Churches, pri­mitiue, superstitious, reformed; of all Common-weales, Iewish, Christian, Heathenish; of all lawes, forraine, and domesticall.

It remaineth now that we take a view and examination of this point with our own eies. And though I be very hart­lesse and timorous of my selfe; yet being thus well backed, me thinkes I am much emboldened to encounter with him, who is most forward to confront these authorities.

First therefore I will put in order such reasons as I haue learned for the discouerie of this sinne, by which it shall the better appeare what substance and validitie there is in these colours and apparitions which are brought in de­fence of it: So that in conclusion men may the more easilie resolue their owne consciences for this point, and accor­dingly amend their liues as God shall moue their hearts.

CHAP. X. The first argument from the nature of the question.

IF there be any (as God knoweth there are too many) who cānot resolue their consciences against vsurie, as against a thing vnlawfull: yet I hope there is none of so vnyeelding a forehead, but will giue thus much to the authoritie aforesaid; as to thinke the lawfulnes of vsurie very questionable and doubtfull at the least. If any shall be so singularly conceited of himselfe, as to make no question after all these, but that vsurie is lawful; I will leaue him in the number of those wise men (whereof Prou. 26. 16. Sa­lomon speaketh) who are wiser then seuen men that can giue a reason. Then men? yea then Churches and Common-weales.

[Page 75] And to the rest who doe make doubt and question of it, I say it is vnlawfull, because it is doubtfull: for the heathen mans principle, Cicer. effic. Quod dubitas ne feceris, is likewise deli­uered for a rule by the Rom 14. 23. Apostle, that Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne. There be three opinions then concerning vsu­rie: some are resolued that it is vnlawfull; and to them the practise of it is a sinne, a knowne sinne, a sin against their own consciences directly. Secondly, some are not resolued at all, but hang in suspence, and to them it is a sinne, if it were in no other respect, yet onely because they doubt of it: for that which Rom. 14. 23. S. Paul speaketh of eating, is likewise appliable to all other actions: He that doubteth is condem­ned if he eate, because he eateth not of faith. So he that doub­teth of any morall action whatsoeuer, if hee doe it, is con­demned, because hee doth it not of faith: for what soeuer is not of faith is sinne. If thou doubt therefore, keepe In Rom. 14. S. Au­gustine his rule: Tene certum, dimitte incertum: thou art most sure it is no sinne to abstaine from vsurie: then keepe that resolution firme, and thou shalt be safe: though per­haps thou thinke, if thou abstaine thou shalt haue the ligh­ter purse, yet withall thou shalt haue the lighter heart, when the sorrowes of death shall make thee heauie. Though in mysteries of Diuinitie, the narrowest sense is the safest: yet in matters of moralitie the largest sense is the best for securitie; in that it keepeth vs farthest off from con­senting vnto sinne.

3. If there be a third sort who be cleerely resolued that vsurie may bee practised with a safe conscience, such are condemned of other sinnes besides vsurie; but especially of pride and singularitie. Of such a one therefore I demand: First, doest thou see with thine owne eyes, or with other mens? If thou be not able thy selfe to examine and resolue, then maist thou resolue for this point as the Church of Christ hath taught thee. Neither doe I herein coast vpon a­ny controuersie of beleeuing as the Church beleeueth: for this that we haue in hand is no principle of faith; no mysterie of saluation to be apprehended in the simplicitie of beliefe; [Page 76] but a point of moralitie belonging to the second table, and so determinable in reason by the rules of equitie and chari­tie, if the Scripture herein had been silent. If thou be there­fore vnlearned, or not so learned as to define such a matter by the rules of reason; then reason and religion both will teach thee to submit thy iudgement to that Church and Common-wealth, whereof by Gods prouidence thou art made a member. But these resolute spirits will be easily in­treated to take the matter into their owne hands without dependance vpon others. I demand then in the next place, hast thou studied the point, examined the branches of it ex­actly? art thou resolued that though the letter of the text be against thee, yet the sense is with thee? hast thou taken a view of all arguments and reasons brought against Vsurie? art thou so Eagle-sighted as to looke through such a cloud of witnesses; and art thou able to dispell them, and to settle thine owne assertion vpon infallible grounds? art thou sure of all this, or dost thou but thinke so? If thou but think so; then thinke thou maiest bee deceiued. If thou bee sure that thou hast waighed all those things in the balance of iudgement; then next waigh thy selfe and thy iudgement: lay that vpon one scoale by it selfe, and if thou hast any consorts and fellowes in this thy resolution (as for mine owne part I know none) if thou hast any, hang them all vpon the same scoale with thee. Put ouer against thee in the other scoale al the authorities of men, fathers and brethren; who haue not touched onely, but taken in hand and sifted this point. Adde vnto these the decrees of Councels, the edicts of Princes, the lawes and statutes of Common-weales: lay on, if you list, the censure of Philosophers in their morals and politickes, the obseruations of Historio­graphers, the sayes of wise and sage Senators; and the wo­full experiments of many kingdomes and nations in for­mer ages. All which if they should be collected and expres­sed to the full, I suppose a volume would not containe that which might iustly be written against Vsurie. Now if thou shalt thinke thy iudgement to bee of such waight, that all [Page 77] these together bee not able to cast the scoale against thee, yet I hope they will so much moue thee, as to bring the balance to a suspence, that thou wilt thinke Vsurie very questionable at the least; and if it bee questionable, then is it vnlawfull to bee done. But if all these will not so moue thy vnderstanding as to make it questionable; then I will say no more, and I can say no lesse, but such a one thinketh that he knoweth somwhat. And then 1. Cor. 8. 2. Saint Paul maketh vp the rest, that such a one knoweth nothing yet as hee ought to know it.

To him therefore who knoweth Vsurie to be a sin, it is a sin, because he knoweth it. To him that doubteth, it is like­wise a sin, because he doubteth. And to the rest it is a sin of ignorance, but of affected ignorance: whose eyes are blin­ded, either with pride, because they would be singuler; or with lucre and gaine, because they would not disturbe their consciences by examining or discouering that sin, where­in they haue so sweetly slept, and do still repose themselues. But such ignorance doth neither excuse nor extenuate the fault, but rather aggrauate the same, because it is wilfull.

CHAP. XI. The second argument from scandall.

HOwsoeuer there be some who make a questi­on whether Vsurie bee lawfull or not: and some there may be, who make little question but that it is in some sort lawfull: yet there is none but must confesse that it is and euer hath beene of ill report, and therefore vnlawfull; vnlawfull for any Christian to practise. It was Saint Cap. 4. 7. Paul his last far­well in his Epistle to the Philippians; after hee had blessed them, with the peace of God which passeth all vnderstanding shall keepe your hearts and minds in Christ Iesus: hee addeth, Moreouer brethren, whatsoeuer things are true, whatsoeuer things are honest, whatsoeuer things are iust, whatsoeuer [Page 78] things are pure, what soeuer things pertaine to charitie, what­soeuer things are of good report; if there be any vertue, if there be any praise, thinke on these things.

I must proue, before I haue done, that Vsurie is neither honest. nor iust, nor pure, nor charitable, nor any of these: but if sufficeth for this present argument that it is not of good report; and therefore to be auoided of Christians. For the Gospell of Christ doth not onely forbid things simply vn­lawfull, but all colour of euill: and as the Apostle conclu deth his patheticall exhortations to the Philippians, with things of good report, so doth he shut vp that bundle of di­uine 1. Thes. 5. 22. precepts to the Thessalonians, with abstaine from all appearance of euill, and then commeth the blessing: Now the very God of peace sanctifie you throughout.

I hope I shall not need to spend time in shewing what appearance of euill there is in that, wherein there is so little shew of good. What is of ill report, but that which the best speake ill of? and what one transgression is there commit­ted either in Church or Common-weale, which the best writers, Christian & profane, haue inueighed more bitterly against then this of vsurie? Admit then it were not simplie euill, yet it hath great appearance of euill: it is of ill report, by that meanes very scandalous, and therefore vnlawfull. That is a true scandall indeed, not taken only, but giuen al­so, which is a prouocation vnto sinne: as Dauids murder and adulterie was not onely a sinne against God (and in that respect vpon his true repentance pardoned in Nathans ab­solution) but also a scandall, because hee prouoked the ene­mies of God to blaspheme. So that beside the sinnes of Dauid as they were transgressions of the 6. and 7. Commande­ments, that scandall also annexed vnto them being nothing else, but aprouocation of the enemie to blaspheme, was a sinne of it selfe and punished by God. 2. Sam. 12. 13. The Lord also hath put a­way thy sinne, howbeit because by this deed thou hast caused the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child that is borne vnto thee shall surely die. That is the great scandall indeed which the holy Ghost doth so often inculcate, that wee [Page 79] might take heed of it, Rom. 2 24. Cap. 14. 16 1. Tim. 6. 4. Tit. 2. 5. 2. Pet. 2. 2. That the name of God and Gospell of Christ be not euill spoken of among Gentiles. Doth not Vsurie cause the enemies of God to blaspheme, and the Gospell of Christ to be euill spoken of; when as prophane persons and such as liue like Gentiles amongst vs shall obserue, that Christians who can call Christ, Lord; that zealous Christi­ans, who can say vnto him, Lord, Lord, doe liue in and by that sinne which was wont to make both life and death so odious? Are not our aduersaries of the Church of Rome as ready to obiect vsurie to vs, as wee haue beene to vpbraid them with single fornication? when they see it not onely practised but patronized amongst vs? And yet they may hold their peace for that; seeing their owne Colledges and Churches long since in the Molinaeus contr. Vsu­rar. q. 74. numer. 584. borders of the Borbons, and o­ther places of France, haue taken fiue in the hundred: which was by them commonly held lawfull, not by common right, but in speciall sauour to religion. For their Clergie is so holy, that the practise of that is in Churchmen hallowed and sanctified, which in the people is most detestable. Let them goe: but let vs not cause them to blaspheme by such scandalous practises.

Plutarch sympos. lib. 4. q. 5. The Heathen Philosopher obseruing the intemperance of the Iewes in their feastings, made a table question, Who was the God of the Iewes? they resolued vpon Bacchus. If his pen should haue light vpon Christian vsurers in these daies, to enquire of our God, I am afraid they would resolue vp­on Plutus at the least, who was wont to come limping home: but Vsurie hath cured him very strangely of that in­firmitie, he comes now as swiftly as time it selfe.

What is scandalous then if this bee not? prouoking all sorts of people, superstitious and prophane, to speake euill of Christians, of reformed Christians, who professe the sin­cerity of the Gospell of Christ.

The Prophet Ieremie lamenting his wofull case that hee was cursed of the people without a cause, bringeth this for his apologie, that he neuer lent nor borrowed vpon Vsurie, as our books haue it. Ier. 15. 10. I haue neither lent on vsurie, nor men [Page 80] haue lent to me on Vsurie; and yet the people curse me. Insinu­ating, that if he had been any waies touched either in len­ding or borrowing, as accessarie to this sinne; he would not haue complained though the people had cursed him. Cur­sed is that offence which bringeth the curse of the people vpon a man. Neither Ieremie nor any of the Saints of God we can reade of, that euer was tainted with Vsurie. Admit then that the wit of man could picke a case so cleane in V­surie, as to make it lawfull. What then? it is scandalous, it is of ill report: he therefore who shall offend his brethren the people of God, who shal cause the enemy to blaspheme, and giue prophane dogges occasion to barke at Christians, by any such vnchristian practise, it were better for him that a milstone were hanged about his necke, and he cast into the bottome of the sea.

CHAP. XII. The third argument from our statute law.

LEt vs looke home into our owne Countrie, and heere we shall find a law expresly for­bidding all kind of Vsurie bee it neuer so little, and withall punishing the same, if a man bee lawfully conuicted. I demand then in the next place, if we bee not bound in conscienceto obey this law? I say not in court of Iustice only before man, but in conscience before God.

The Rom. 13. 5. Apostle maketh a direct answere for me: Where­fore we must be subiect, not because of wrath onely, but for con­science sake. A conscience so bound, as nothing can set it at liberty in this case except only the law it selfe be vnlawfull; and then Act. 5. 29. we must obey God rather then men. Therfore when this kind of argument is vrged for obedience, men haue vsed to quarrell with the law; as if that were not agreeable to Gods law: But heere is no place for any such cauill; for it is the same law which God himselfe made for his owne [Page 81] people, witnesse euen those who haue most defended vsu­rie. Mclinaeus.

I haue heard many, and some of no meane vnderstan­ding, who doe earnestly endeuour to let loose their consci­ences, and teach vs so to doe, by making a disiunctiue in­terpretation of a penall statute. As if the meaning of the law were but this; Either abstaine, or pay thus much, if thou be conuicted. Making the penaltie a branch of the law: as if either of the branches being obserued, the law were fullie kept, and no offence made either to God or man. Which because it is a point much stood vpon, and as yet (for ought that I know) vnhandled, giue me leaue, by your patience, a little to looke into it. In the examining whereof I shall not much step out of my way. For albeit the interpretation of a statute doth belong vnto another profession; yet this particular point coasteth vpon Diuinitie, and pitcheth di­rectly vpon the common grounds of reason.

In euery penall statute there be two things to be consi­dered; the law and the penaltie. Which two, howsoeuer they be combined in the statute, yet there must be a distinct consideration of each.

1. First, euery good and iust law in his owne nature, as it is a law, hath a binding power; by which it is not directiue only, as by way of aduertisement, but compulsiue, as pro­ceeding from authoritie.

2. Secondly, this binding power of the law doth not onely proceed from the nature of the thing therein com­manded or forbidden, but from the powerfull will of the Commander or lawgiuer. For if a common person shall ad­monish me, as a brother, of some thing which is hurtfull or preiudiciall, I am bound to follow his aduice, from the na­ture of the thing it selfe, because it is hurtfull; else I should offend. But if the authoritie of parents, Magistrates, or law, shall moreouer forbid the same, I haue a second bond thereby laid vpon me; which if I shall breake, then vnto my former offence I shall adde the sinne of disobedience. Which as it is a distinct sinne from the former, so be these [Page 82] two distinct obligations; the one deriued from the nature of the thing prohibited; the other from the law or persons in authoritie.

3. Admit then in the third place that the thing prohi­bited by the premised authoritie, haue no binding power in it own nature, without a law published against it; but be a thing arbitrarie, and in my power to doe or leaue vndone; then am I freed indeed from the former bond in respect of the thing it selfe: notwithstanding I stand obliged to the authoritie of the law for the faithful obseruing of the same; except only in case the thing thereby forbidden be of such a nature, as doth dissolue this bond, by some opposition to a superiour law. For those matters therefore which bee not determined by any law of God, there is giuen to the wise sages and gouernours of Common-weales, a iudiciall po­wer, not onely to discerne what is for the common good, but also to enact, impose, and establish lawes and statutes, vnto which we are bound both to subscribe in iudgement, and in practise to obey. Albeit such a law cannot by eui­dent consequence bee necessarily deriued from any law of God or reason, yet if it doe not crosse or oppose the same, it is sufficient. As lawes which are apparantly friuolous, con­taining matter of little moment, need not much to trouble our consciences, because there appeareth some opposition betweene them and the law of reason, which teacheth vs that a law is a matter of maiestie, and serious command; and therefore the subiect of it ought to be answerably a matter of waight and moment, as the matter of vsurie is. Be it ther­fore proposed that those wholesome lawes and statutes which carrie no shew of opposition to a superiour law, though they command or forbid such things as before were held indifferent, yet euen as they are lawes doe they binde the conscience by vertue of Gods law.

4. Which lawes thus enacted, by humane authoritie, be in force, not onely before the Iudge to the vndergoing of temporall punishment; but also to binde the conscience before God: not by any power in themselues, for they be [Page 83] but humane; but, as secondarie causes doe worke in the vertue of the first cause, so doe these lawes worke vpon the conscience, by vertue of his law who alone hath the soue­raigne authoritie ouer the inward man. He hath comman­ded vs to obey, not because of wrath only; not for penalties, displeasure, or outward respect only, but for conscience sake. Rom. 13. 5. Thus much, I hope, we shall be able to proue. Whereupon it must of necessitie follow, that admit euery act of vsurie were not simply in it selfe vnlawfull; yet if it be simply for­bidden by a law published, as a thing perilous among Chri­stians, or preiudiciall to the common good; then are wee bound in conscience to auoid euery vsurious act as malum prohibitum, forbidden by a good and wholsome law. Which law if we shall transgresse, we doe sinne against God.

Let this therefore in the first place be propounded, that such humane lawes as be not opposite vnto the law of God or nature, haue a binding power: howbeit not alwaies from the nature of the thing it selfe thereby commanded, or for­bidden; but euen as they be lawes proceeding from that authoritie which is the ordinance of God.

Which that it may the better appeare, it is obseruable, that almightie God did first assume vnto himselfe that li­bertie and power of binding mens consciences meerely by his commanding authoritie, as hee was a law-giuer. Next that hee did impart the same (though not in the same de­gree) to his vicegerents vpon earth.

It was his diuine pleasure to manifest this power euen in the Gen. 2. 17. first law that euer was giuen: for what hurt could there haue been in eating of the forbidden fruit, if it had not bin forbidden? why might not that tree haue been touched and tasted as well as the rest, if there had not been an edict against it? Gen. 22. 2. Abraham likewise after the fall was comman­ded to offer his sonne Isaac: which commandement, if it had not bin giuen, Abraham could neuer haue found any motiue for such a sacrifice: but much might he haue found against it, in that law of nature which was written in his heart.

[Page 84] This degree of power God as the supreme lawgiuer hath reserued wholly vnto himselfe, so as it shall not bee lawfull for any created power whatsoeuer, to enact a law against the law of nature; or to dispense with a diuine statute. Yet notwithstanding in case it carrie no opposition to a supe­riour law, God hath giuen a binding power euen to the commandement of man, though not against, yet without any obligatorie vertue in the thing commanded: he ad­iudging in his diuine wisedome that this was the best for the establishing of authoritie amongst men, for the kee­ping of men in obedience, and euery way for the publique good. For if men should not obey the lawes and com­mands of their superiours, before such time as they saw something in the thing commanded, which should exact the same at their hands, verely the Mat. 8. 9. Centurion did not well in approuing his souldiers for comming, going, and doing this, at a word: yea masters had better a great deale goe a­bout their businesse themselues, then send many seruants: and if this were our case, all gouernment and, humane af­faires would be soone at a stand.

Wherefore God doth not only allow those lawes which doe enact that which is alr [...]e enacted by his law; or which may bee thence deri [...] by necessarie consequence, as a conclusion out of the premisses: but all those determi­nations and particular constitutions which doe not crosse the law of God or nature, are in his estimate accounted iust, and to bee obeyed. For as Christ in the Gospell said of those who did cast out diuels in his name, Luk. 9. 50 He that is not against vs is with vs; so may God rightly be conceiued to esteeme of all humane lawes, made for the reformation of manners; those which are not against him are with him: and therefore by his law confirmed and made of force to binde the conscience.

This appeareth by the example of the Iere. 35. Reahabites, in their obedience to their father Ionadab, the sonne of Re­chab; whom they obeyed, not because the things forbid­den were in themselues [...] (for houses, vineyards, [Page 85] and fields are the good blessings of God:) neither was it for feare of displeasure, for 2. King. 10. 15. Ionadab was dead three hundred yeeres before; but only they thought themselues bound in conscience to obey their fathers commandement. Which opinion of theirs was iustified and approued of God to be true and sound, in that he did not only commend, but re­ward their obedience. Ier. 35. 18 Thus saith the Lord of hosts the God of Israel, because ye haue obeyed the commandement of Iona­dab your father, and kept all his precepts, and done according to all that he hath commanded you, Ionadab the sonne of Rechab shall not want a man to stand before me for euer.

If a father then haue such command ouer his sonnes, for so many generations as were betweene the daies of Ie­hu and the raigne of Iehoiakim: how much more shall the lawes and statutes inacted by the gouernours of Common-weales, and the bodie representatiue assembled for the publike good, binde euery subiect to the obedience of the same?

But wee shall not neede to goe farre for an instance of this point. Our law at home is a pregnant proofe, that a law doth binde euen as it is a law, though the thing there­by imposed be of it selfe most free and indifferent. I speake of that Common or municipall law of our Countrie, whose maxims are not meerely grounded vpon the axioms and principles of reason and common equitie, but vpon the pe­culiar customes of this Countrie. I demaund then whence this law hath a binding power? Is it from the nature of the thing imposed? doth it command or forbid nothing but that which out of the principles of nature and reason may by demonstration be proued to be good or bad in it selfe? Verely then were it of as great power beyond Douer, as it is on this side: for the law of nature and reason is euerie where alike.

But it is the custome of place and people which addeth power: for euen a custome doth bind taking vpon it the nature of a law. Ligat consuetudo quatenus interpretatiue lex est. Be it custome then, or be it a perfect law, it must haue a [Page 86] greater power of binding, euen as it is a custom or a law, thē can alwaies be raised out of the nature of the thing accu­stomed or imposed: For circumstances may so alter the mat­ter, as that which is imposed may be sometimes not so con­uenient, as in common intendment a good law doth pre­sume. Yet hath it been euer though more conuenient, that some particular inconuenience should bee borne, then an ancient custome or law should bee broken. And if the bin­ding power of a law should worke no further then the thing it selfe, of it selfe, doth moue the conscience without a law; then were it no power at all; but euery mans pri­uate conscience should haue power to abrogate and disa­null, as fast as authority doth inact. A priuate power then must not abrogate that which is publicke: Nihilagit vltra suam speciem: but euery priuate man doth stand bound to a humane law, vntill the same authoritie which bound him doe absolue him. All things therfore considered, it is a dan­gerous conceit to imagine, that the power of humane lawes doth extend no further then the qualitie of the thing it selfe doth carie the conscience: and so dangerous, as if it should take palce, it would violate that authority which is the ordinance of God; and shake the very pillers of the earth.

§ 2.

2 Then for the penaltie (which maketh it a penall law) I demand what power that hath to alter the premisses? Is the vndergoing of such a penaltie an expiation of the sinne committed in transgressing the law? God forbid. The least sin deserueth a greater punishment then man can inflict. Or hath it a power to dissolue that bond which by vertue of Gods law lieth vpon my conscience? Or is it so incorpo­rate into the law, that it leaueth a free choice vnto men, in­differently either to obserue such an act, or to vndergoe such a penaltie?

Verily this is auerred; but the contrarie seemeth vnto me very pregnant, vpon these reasons following.

1 First (to make some way to that which followeth) it [Page 87] is much to the preiudice and weakning of good lawes; to giue such interpretations, as doe dispence with the consci­ence, and set that at libertie. For if men be taught to make no conscience of this kind of obedience (as God knowes they make but little) such lawes shall lie as contemptible in the estimate both of good and bad; as well of the obe­dient as of lawlesse and vnruly people; euery man keeping or breaking the same, as shall seeme best for his owne pri­uate aduantage. But I would rather thinke and teach, that as God Almightie is not an idle beholder of mens affaires, but hath a powerfull working in euery action; either to effect it or dispose it vnto good: so sitting, as Dauid spea­keth, in the parliament or assemblie of gods, hee giueth an in­fluence into euery good law enacted, and by his owne law bindeth the conscience to the obedience of the fame.

2 The end of a law is to withold men from vnlawfull acts, such as bee thought vnfit to bee done or suffered in a well established gouernment. For if men would of them­selues refraine, there should be no vse of lawes, as the 1. Tim. 1. 9. A­postle saith; The law is not giuen to the iust man, but to the laxlesse and disobedient. They be snaffles and bridles to curbe those Psal. 32. 9. horses and mules which wil not otherwise be ruled. And consequently the end of a penall law is by such a pe­nalty to withhold the disobedient, that such people might seele the smart of punishment who haue no sense of consci­ence. First therefore, if men would bee good of themselues, there should need no lawes. Next, if men would make a conscience to obey that law which is made, there should need no penaltie to be annexed. As the law therefore is or­dained for good manners; so the penaltie is a thing subor­dinate to the law. Now it is premised, that euery good law without the penaltie by vertue of Gods law doth bind the conscience: shall the penaltie then bee added to disanull that bond? shall law and penaltie bee so incorporate and tempered together, that the one shall disable the other? this is no good morter. Wee did rather thinke that penal­ties were annexed to corroborate and strengthen the law, [Page 88] that by punishing transgressors according to the proporti­on and degree of the offence, men might bee the more a­fraid to offend.

3 But (to speake in their language who doe vrge this interpretation) if a penall law be disiunctiuely to be vnder­stood: that is, either to be obeyed, or else to vndergoe such a forfeiture; I demand whether of these two is principally intended by the law? Doth the statute first intend the penal­tie, or doth it lie indifferent vnto both alike? If either of these, then is it an vniust law. For a good lawgiuer had ra­ther haue his law kept then broken: the reason is, because the obseruation or keeping of it is simply good: but the pu­nishment of a transgressor hath in it the nature of euill, tearmed malum poenae; therefore a good intention is first moued vnto that which is good; that the law may beekept. And in the second place, a punishment is intended, as it is a remedie against a greater euill then it selfe. I stand bound then euen in conscience vnto a good law, according to the simple intent of it: that is to say, not because of the penalty only, or, to speak in the phrase of the holy Ghost: not because of wrath onely, (which is all one:) but chiefly that I may Rom. 13. performe that good thing which the law doth chiefly in­tend: which if I shall trangresse, the penaltie is indeed a sa­tisfaction to that law, but no expiation of my sinne of diso­bedience.

4 Last of all, that we may cleere this statute of all such im­putation, (a statute which hitherto hath had no blemish cast 13. Elizab. vpon it, being without the compasse and reach of their or­dinarie exceptions, the opposition to Gods law, the abridge­ment of Christian libertie, scandall, and such like stones which they vse to fling at lawes:) If the Statute had any such pur­pose to make a disiunctiue law, how shall that appeare? For if it be not expressed, then is it by common intendment to be vnderstood according to the premised rules: and to put it out of quarrell, that the contrary is intended, shall appeare by three points within the statute.

1 First, there is a speciall clause in this statute of Vsurie [Page 89] that it shall bee most largely and strongly construed for the re­pressing of Vsurie against all persons who shall offend. But this construction doth contrariwise giue a liberty to commit Vsurie: so a man will venture the forfeiture in case he bee conuicted: Like the Pharisies Corban, who if the offrings be brought, will dispence with obedience and honour due Mark. 7. Hos. 7. 11. to parents. This is * to eate the sinnes of the people, which is not iustifiable in any law.

2 The nature and extent of the penaltie doth import no lesse. For it doth not only punish excessiue Vsurie aboue ten in the hundred; but all vnder ten, vnder nine, vnder eight, be it neuer so little; it is punishable by the statute; and therefore simplie forbidden by the intent of the same. For the Vsurie or ouerplus which is taken aboue the prin­cipall is not restored to the borrower; for then were it no punishment: because euery partie were in statu quo prius, as he was before the couenant: But it is all forfeited by the law to the king, and the informer, in the name of a punish­ment, shall be punished in forme following: which if it be a iuft punishment must presuppose a breach of iustice in the par­ties punished.

3 The third is, the motiue which moued the Parliament to make this act. For as much as all Ʋsurie being forbidden by the law of God is sin, and detestable; be it enacted, &c. It was therefore enacted against vsurie, because it is a sinne and detestable, forbidden by the law of God: Is there any doubt then but it was the meaning of the statute simply to forbid it? It is true indeed, that the preamble is no essen­tiall part of the act: yet is it as a key to open the intention and true meaning of the law, nothing better.

But the restlesse wit of man, if it bee once set vpon contradiction, will neuer giue ouer. I haue heard it obie­cted, that whereas it is said in the statute, For as much as all Ʋsurie being forbidden by the law of God is sinne and detesta­ble, those words (being forbidden by the law of God) are in­serted, not as a reason of the assertion; but as a part of the subiect of the proposition: all vsurie being forbidden: that [Page 90] is to say; all Vsurie which is forbidden by the law of God is sin, and detestable. As if some Vsurie were not forbidden. Wit whither wilt thou? The sequel runneth thus: For as much as all Vsurie being forbidden by the law of God is sinne and de­testable; he it enacted, that all Vsurie, loane, &c. shall be puni­shed in forme following. Doth not the consequence plainely shew that the law meant honestly in the antecedent? that for as much as all Vsurie is forbidden by the law of God; be it therefore enacted that all Vsurie shall bee punished?

Whether it be a cleere case or questionable, that all Vsu­rie is forbidden by Gods law, is not materiall for this argu­ment; lay that by for another place. This notwithstanding is cleere, that the iudgement of the lawmakers in that Par­liament was, that Vsurie is simply euill in it selfe; and ther­fore the meaning of that law is simplie to forbid it. For as they conceiued it to bee forbidden by Gods law; so did they also by their iudiciall power and authoritie adiudge and determine it to be not onely scandalous, but perilous and preiudicious to a Christian common-wealth: and ther­upon enacted a law, and prescribed a punishment against all Vsurie whatsoeuer. What hindreth then why we should not submit our selues to this act, euen for conscience sake? Admit the lawmakers did erre in thinking euery vsurious act to be forbidden by the law of God: shall euery suppo­sed error disanull such a solemne act? God forbid. A man for the purpose is moued to chuse such a wife, supposing her to be of so great wealth, and of so good qualities: hee is somewhat deceiued in both his motiues. What then? Shall his error make his mariage void? nothing lesse: so long as the errour is not essentiall to the act it selfe, the act shall thereby receiue no preiudice or hurt at all.

It appeareth then, that these conclusions following doe necessarily arise out of the premisses.

1. First, in this statute of Vsurie there is nothing inacted contrary to the law of God; and therefore in Gods ac­count it is a iust law. 2. If it be a iust law, then doe we stand bound in conscience to obey it according to the simple [Page 91] meaning of the same. In conscience, I say, not by any inhe­rent vertue in the statute; but by vertue of his command who bids vs obey, for conscience sake. 3. It is the simple meaning of this statute, simply and absolutely to forbid all Vsurie whatsoeuer; and therefore albeit in Germanie and Geneua their consciences may be free from this obligation of a positiue law, because their lawes against Vsurie be not so precise: yet in England we are cleerely condemned for any increase or ouerplus whatsoeuer: condemned in the court of conscience, by vertue of the law of God, for trans­gressing of this statute: condemned euen by the rule of master Caluin himselfe: Ne excedatur modus constitutus in Epist. de Vsura. quauis regione vel republ. Some branch of this argument is questionable: yet is the inference cleere; this being a sta­tute for the publike good.

CHAP. XIII. The fourth argument, that it is vnnaturall.

THat the Heathen writers, who neuer heard text of Scripture against vsurie, at whose light notwithstanding for nature and art, we doe all light our candles, should with consent condemne it, it makes mee thinke that there is somewhat in nature against it; especially see­ing how that sunne of nature Aristotle, whom his mother loued so deerely, that she kept few things from him, hath concluded it to be, an vnnaturall increase. Few things haue dropped from his pen, but with good congruity of reason: let vs therefore briefly examine what we find.

1 First, it is euident that the primitiue life was most na­turall, and therefore the most innocent, when men liued vpon that increase which God gaue by the yeeld of the earth and liuing creatures. For the first trade that euer na­ture taught, was to till the ground; by which man might be fed: wherein Adam his eldest sonne was trained. The Gen. 4. 2. next was the keeping of sheepe, which Abel learned, to [Page 92] clothe their nakednesse. And as from these two all other trades and professions, for worldly commoditie, were deri­ued; so must they be content as from the originall to take some direction. The first in each kinde is a rule. The inno­cencie and integritie whereof God approoued in that he would be worshipped himselfe in the first fruits, and haue his priests maintained by the tithes and oblations of such increase. Stipendarie maintenance was first the inuention of that Idolater Iudg. 17. 10. Micha: yet such is much better then none at all; Meate and drinke, a suite of apparell, tenne shickles of siluer by the yeere, for a Leuite it is well. But how well the Leuits master came by those shickles, is more then ye Leuite wel knowes. That which came by the sickle & sithe was the best and fittest for God; because most agreeable to na­ture, which the ancient Cato dere rustica. Cicero in cato. Doctors of nature haue obserued.

But after that the world was replenished with people of all sorts and qualitie, necessitie brought in the change and transportation of such commodities as the condition of men did require.

Non omnis fert omnia tellus.

And for the more easie and commodious transportation, buying and selling with money, and merchandizing in all kinds was practised of all people: yea of Iuda and Israel, Ezek. 27. 17. and neuer forbidden. Which gaine, though it be greater and more royall, yet it cannot be denied, but, as it is more remote from primitiue increase, so is it more to be suspe­cted of iniquitie. Salomon made a prouerbe of it: It is naught, it is naught, saith the buyer: but when he is gone apart Prou. 20. 14. he boasteth. So, it is good, it is good, saith the seller; and when he hath his money he laugheth.

A Merchant is good, but it is not good to be a very Mer­chant. Prouerbiall speeches be often true. So it is true, that there is as much craft vnder the russet coate, as the Citizens gowne. God amend vs all. But the craft lieth not in husban­drie, but as husbandmen play the Merchants in buying, sel­ling, and making of bargains. When Christ droue the buy­ers and sellers out of the Temple, and charged them for ma­king Mat. 21. 14. [Page 93] his fathers house a denne of theeues; he doth not accuse buying and selling of theft: but taxeth the common abuse and corruption that was amongst them. For, as he that tou­cheth pitch shall be defiled: so such as liue vpon negotiation, shall haue much adoe to keepe their hands cleane. There be Ecclesiast. 13. 1. two things (saith the Wise man) which me thinke to be hard and perilous: A Merchant cannot lightly keepe him from wrong, and a Victualler is not without sinne.

3 If these professions bee so suspiciously thought and written of, which be so necessarie and commodious for all estates; which by skill and industrie inrich kingdomes and Common-weales, with such varietie of Gods blessings; which minister to the necessities of all sorts and degrees, by transferring and distributing such commodities as nature her selfe hath brought foorth for the vse of men: what shall we deeme of such as meddle not with natures increase, saue onely in consuming and deuouring it; but liue and inrich themselues by a thing meerely artificiall; the instrument of transportation, money? which is indeed the price of all, and so in estimate answereth all, and commands al amongst men: yet a thing of it selfe meerely artificiall. The mettall of gold and siluer, I confesse, is the increase of nature: but money carrying the stampe of authoritie, to be the price of things, is meerely artificiall. Vpon this artificiall thing, yet not vpon this, but the vse of this; as it is vsed, not by them­selues, but altogether by others, doe these whom wee call Vsurers liue, maintaine themselues & increase their wealth. And now me thinkes I am come to a profession so remote from the first originall, that she hath shaken hands with na­ture, and is become a meere stranger vnto her. Let vs see if there be any resemblance betweene them.

When they write that money is barren and vnfruitfull; it is to be vnderstood chiefly in two respects.

1. First, whereas seed cast into the ground, doth by mans industrie bring foorth more into the world then there was before, some thirtie, some sixtie, and some an hundred fold: Mat. 13. 8. whereas cattell doe increase and multiplie, that the world [Page 94] is the fatter for them: whereas the labour and trauell of men doth enrich and replenish the earth, money is only an instrument to shuffle wealth out of one mans hand into an other, and to transport from place to place: but the summe of one hundred pounds, turne it and returne it as often as you can, is still the same summe without increase, the pee­ces where euer they be, remaine still the same without al­teration, there is not one whit more in rerum natura. No­thing is brought into the world more then when the mo­ney was first disbursed.

2. Secondly, whereas there is nothing in nature, or art, that is worth any thing, but hath some vse in it selfe, if it be well vsed: nothing whatsoeuer it be, naturall or artificiall, but it serueth either to feed, or to cloath, or to shelter, or to heale, or to refresh, or to adorne, or to worke withall, or to play withall: yet for money, as it is current money, there is no manner of vse to be made of it, but only in parting from it; no more then of a counter; no more then of durt in the streete, nor so much, for that will dung the ground. Adde vnto this, that there is nothing in the world which doth yeeld increase, or hath vse in it selfe, but it is the weaker for giuing increase, and the worse for the vsing; euen milstones will weare. So that in things which passe betweene man and man for hire, the equitie is apparant, both for the pos­sessor to pay hire, because he may haue vse of it while he doth enioy it; and for the owner also to take hire, because it weareth in the vsing and is worse for the wearing: only money neither bringeth increase to the world in generall, neither is it of any vse to the possessor, but only in disposses­sing himselfe of it. Yet this money, for this vse, shall be to the Vsurer fruitfull, and profitable, and neuer the weaker or worse for the vsing: for his hundred pound shall bee made good vnto him, as sound and good as euer it was. It shall conceiue, breed, and bring foorth vnto him without trauell, cost, or perill, tenne yong angels once in sixe mo­neths at the furthest. This increase vnto naturall Philoso­phers did seeme vnnaturall.

[Page 95] Moreouer, nature hath established in all things vnder the Sunne, a certaine terme and pitch when they shall make stay of increase and multiplying. The land if it want a lu­bele, will in time grow hartlesse: houses if they be not ree­dified will decay: trees will leaue bearing, and cattell bree­ding, when they grow old: mans labours and skill wil faile with yeeres: only the Vsurers money doth multiplie infinit­ly; the longer the lustier: if he can but liue, hee may see his moneys moneys money, euen a hundred generations. Is not this [...]? Verily, though it bee no demonstration a­gainst euery act of begetting money vpon money by mo­ney; yet it sheweth this kind of increase to be very vnkind, and to haue but small resemblance vnto that naturall in­crease, which the God of nature hath established as most innocent amongst men.

CHAP. XIIII. The fifth argument, that it is vngodly.

AS nature teacheth men to doe that which is seemly, kind, and naturall; so religion and pietie teacheth Christian men, in all their affaires, to depend vpon Gods pro­uidence, and still to expect a blessing from heauen. So it ought to be, and so it is in all professions, except vsurie: Nullum de Deo hominum genus peius sentiunt quam danistarum: sudum sit an tempe­stas, perinde illi est: Of all men the Vsurers thinke worst of God, and will least trust him: be it faire or soule, all is one; they will haue their money. The husbandman lookes vp to the cloudes, and prayeth for seasonable weather: The Merchant obserues the winde, and prayeth God to deliuer him from tempest and wrack: The tradesman wisheth the people may haue money, that he may vent his wares at a reasonable rate, and liue in some good fashion: The labou­ring man prayeth for worke and health, that he may get a [Page 96] poore liuing with the sweate of his browes; only the Vsu­rer of all others hath least need to say his prayers: be it wet or drie; be it tempest or calme; blow the wind East, West. North or South; be he well, or be he sicke; bee hee goutie and lame, or be he sound of body; let him be what he will, or doe what his list; he will be sure of his money. for time onely worketh for him; all the daies in the Calender be set a worke to worke out his gaine; yea Sabbaths and all; the red letter is as fit as the blacke for his businesse, to make vp the number of daies, of weekes, of moneths; so the time go­eth out and the money commeth in.

I will not denie it may fall out sometime that the Vsu­rer may lose a summe of money, as Act. 16. Paul and Silas were loosed out of prison, whē the iailors thought they had laid on bonds enow. So I grant there may come such an earth­quake, and sometime doth, that the Vsurers bonds and ob­ligations will be of little effect: but ordinarily, if he bee his trades-master, hee shall not stand in so great need of Gods blessing as other honest men doe. Can wee thinke in con­science that God is pleased with such a life?

Saint Paul giueth a charge to Timothie, To charge the rich of this world that they trust not in vncertaine riches, but 1. Tim. 6. 17. in the liuing God, who giueth all things abundantly to enioy. God hath therefore made riches vncertaine, because wee should not trust in them, but in him who giueth them. That contract therefore, which for lucre and gaine maketh the vsurers money, both principall and increase, certaine vnto him, which God hath made vncertaine in it selfe; doth crosse his diuine ordinance; and is so far forth an vngodly contract. Beside, the more certaine he maketh wealth vnto himselfe, the more he doth withdraw himselfe out of Gods blessing into the warme sunne: to sit quietly at home without care, and to be sure of his money: This is vngodly.

But it will be said: if God haue made riches vncertaine, it is not the Vsurer can make them certaine True, yet vnto himselfe hee maketh them certaine by transferring their vncertainty vpon others. He takes the bond of a man to se­cure [Page 97] him against God, both for his gaine and principall; a­gainst all casualtie whatsoeuer, against the act of God him­selfe: This is vngodly.

I meddle not with assurances in this place; they bee no part of my question: In them there is a more equall aduen­ture, where the gainer beareth the perill, and where Gods hand in the losse lighteth vpon both parties. But light it where it will, vpon the Vsurer, by his owne will, it shall neuer light. Yea but will hee, nil he, hee must trust God, whose prouidence is ouer all. True, but if he do it perforce against his will, it is nothing. Art thou willing according to the rules of piety, to trust God with thine owne goods? then tempt him not, and thou maiest trust him safely. That is to say, arme thy selfe with all conuenient security against the fraud and deceit of men; for the world is naught: bee as prouident as thou canst against all casualties that may befall: so God would haue thee; else thou shalt tempt him. Then if thou send out thy goods for thine owne aduan­tage, send them out as thine owne, desire a blessing vpon them; if they perish by the default of another in whose hands they be, good reason that he should pay for his own fault; but if the hand of God be vpon them, remember they be thy goods, sent out for thy gaine, as well as for the bor­rowers: they be Gods blessings, it is the Lord that gaue them, and the Lord hath taken them; blesse his name: this is a god­ly and Christian resolution: else thou doest build the tower of Babel to defend thy selfe against heauen; thou takest se­curitie of a wretched man, both for thine owne goods and Gen. 11. 4. gaine; for Gods blessing against the hand of God himselfe. Montes impietatis.

This which I say vnto all in generall, I say vnto old men in particular, who be attentiores ad rem: who haue giuen ouer trading, and begin now to repose themselues vpon V­surie. Will not such a man trust God in his old daies, who hath blessed and preserued him thus farre? Remember the time is not long, vntill thou must trust him with a far grea­ter matter. Not the principall of thy money; but the prin­cipall [Page 98] of all, euen thy soule must bee committed into his hands, who is able and may iustly cast it into hell fire. Ad­mit God shall by his owne act take away some part of thy wealth; thinke with thy selfe, it may bee I haue gotten some part vniustly, and God will pare it away, that he may withall cut off my sinne for my soules sake. And if it please God hereby to trie my patience; The Lord hath giuen and the Lord hath taken; as it pleaseth the Lord, so commeth Iob 1. 21. things to passe: blessed be the name of the Lord.

CHAP. XV. The sixth argument, that it is vniust.

THe second table is deriued from the first; therefore if vsurie be vngodly, how can it be iust? It offendeth against heauen and against earth: vniust it is, whether we consider the nature of the thing it selfe, as it is before defined; or whether wee respect the persons themselues whom it doth con­cerne.

Looke vpon the definition, and in it vpon three things. 1. the Loane. 2. the Couenant for the loane. and 3. the Lu­cre vpon couenant: and euery one of these will proue the iniquitie of it.

1 First, it is the nature of loane to be free: for as a thing is not giuen but sold, vnlesse it be freely giuen: so is not any thing lent, but rather let, if it goe for hire. We haue defined Vsurie by lending or mutuation: and so hath the Scripture Exod. 22. 25. Deut. 23. 19. likewise. Vnto which our Molinaeus aduersarie in this point doth accord, that the obiect of Vsurie is a thing lent, called mu­tuum. But lending is a worke of mercy, of kindnesse, of bountie, of liberality; it was euer so taken both in Scrip­ture and common conceite. Deut. 23 8. Thou shalt not shut vp thy compassion, but shalt lend. Plalm. 112. 5. A good man is mercifull and len­deth. Luk. 6. 35. Do good and lend. Lending, I say, is a worke of mercy [Page 99] to the poore, of kindnesse to thy friend; thou must not ther­fore set a price vpon it.

Those are much deceiued then, who thinke that Vsurie is iust, because the vse of money for a time is worth money; and therefore if no more bee taken then the vse is worth, there is no iniquitie. This rule holdeth in buying and sel­ling, but not in acts of charity; therein it is no good rule. Thou bidst, for the purpose, thy poore neighbours to din­ner: this is money worth; for it cost thee money, and sa­ueth them money at home: yet thou wilt not set a price vpon it. Why? because it is a worke of charity. Thou bidst thy rich neighbour sometimes; that which hee eateth is worth money: yet thou wilt take none; but thinke foule scorne it should bee offered. Why? because it is an act of kindnesse, of neighbourhood, of friendship: these things may not bee bought and sold, the nature of them is to bee free. Lending is a worke of mercy to the poore, of kind­nesse to thy neighbour; and therefore is euer free. It is as vniust a thing to sell charity, or friendship, as it is to sell iu­stice: both are naught; this is briberie, and that is Vsurie; let them goe together.

2 If thou looke vpon the Couenant for this loane, it is vnequall: wherein thou dost bind the borrower to make good the principall, and to pay thee increase for the vse of the same principall, for the time it is lent.

I demand then, during the time of loane whose is the prin­cipall? thine or the borrowers? It was thine before thou lent it, and it shall be thine at the day of payment; but du­ring the time of loane, it is the borrowers: for thou hast by couenant passed ouer both vse and propertie to the borro­wer: so that during that time thou wilt not owne it; if it perish, it perisheth to the borrower, as to the right owner for that time. If it bee none of thine then, but the borro­wers for that time; I aske, by what right canst thou coue­nant to receiue hire for the vse of that which is none of thine, during the time it is not thine?

If thou let a horse, house, or land, thou maiest couenant [Page 100] to receiue hire because thou hast passed ouer their vse only, reseruing the propertie of them to thy selfe; so that thou art owner of horse, house and land still, during the time they be in an other mans possession. Therefore if the posses­sor shall abuse thy horse, or make waste vpon thy land, thou doest iustly complaine, because the property of them is thine: so is it not in money. Why doest thou then couenant for hire, for the vse of that wherein thou hast no right or property? Thou wilt happily imagine, this is but a quiditie or schoole tricke put vpon thee. Thou thinkest in very deed the money is thine being so lent, hee hath but the vse onely for a time. Be it so then: Let the principall bee thine in couenant, as it is in very deed. Bee thou the owner of it, during the time the borrower vseth it: so that if it miscarie, thy money miscarieth, and not his; for euery thing peri­sheth to the right owner. Nay (quoth the Vsurer) there I leaue you. Though the principall indeed bee mine, yet if it miscarie it shall be his, he shall beare the perill: I will make that in my bargaine. Therefore, say I, it is an vnequall and vniust bargaine. The borrower hath the vse onely of thy principall, and payeth for the vse, which alone is his: why should he then beare the perill of thy principall, which is none of his? The vse only he hath, and hee payeth for that which hee hath: why shouldest thou burthen him then with that he hath not? This is no quiditie: It is the equitie of Gods law. Exod. 22. 15. The borrower shall not make it good, for if it be an hired thing, it came for the hire. It is added, if the owner thereof stand by: (to wit) that it appeare to perish or be hurt, not by any fault of the borrower. So admit money could by Vsurers bee made an hired thing; yet the equitie of Gods law bindeth, that if it appeare to miscarie without the fault of the owner; the borrower shall not make it good, because it came for hire.

3 If we consider the quantitie and qualitie of this lucre or interest, (as they commonly tearme it) it appeareth still worse and worse.

1 First, there is great gaine, which is seldome iust: Prou. 28. 20. Hee [Page 101] that maketh hast to be rich shall not be innocent. What a sim­ple foole was Aristotle, to call money barren, which yeel­deth a double haruest at the least euery yeere? sixe moneths is the most; nay three moneths returne is ordinarie, and yet still the former crop maketh seed corne for the next. Let me see: Admit one thousand might bee set by free, to run at interest, and not faile, 70. yeeres (which is but the age of a man) it would increase to a million, a thousand sold; a pretie proportion, to sit still and doe nothing.

2 In all honest trades, the greater gaine, the greater ad­uenture still. Soft gaine is sure: the more vncertaine the gaine is, the greater it may be, and good reason it should be so. When the great gaine of Merchants in former time hath been obiected vnto them, they could say of their goods as Saint Paul writeth of himselfe: In perils of water, in perils of robbers, in perils of mine owne nation, in perils among the Gen­tiles, 2. Cor. 11. 26. in perils in the wildernesse, in perils in the sea, in perils a­mong false brethren: and it was thought a reasonable apo­logie; but Vsurers haue the gaine, great gaine, and others beare the perill, great perill.

3 Great and certaine gaine out of vncertainties; the great and certaine gaine of the lender, out of the vncertaine gaine of the borrower. Vncertaine, whether it shall be lit­tle or great: vncertaine, whether it shall be any at all: vn­certaine, whether hee saue the principall: But win hee or lose he, the couenant is for a certainty: Certum lucrum ex incerta negotiatione.

4 Adde vnto this, that such great and certaine gaine out of these vncertainties commeth in without labour or cost, or trouble to speake of. Heere is a cleanly Alchymist, who can extract so much siluer, & wast nothing in smoake.

Summe all together; so haue you; great gaine and cer­taine to the vsurer: sometimes out of little gaine; some­times out of no gaine; sometimes out of losse; alwaies out of vncertainties; alwaies out of labour and paines, out of care and cost, out of hazard and perill to the borrower. Commeth all this on Gods name?

§. 2.

Take a view of the parties whom vsurie doth concerne, they be three in number: The Vsurer, the Borrower, the Common-wealth.

1. First, let the Vsurer be his owne Iudge. Aske him if he be an Vsurer? No, there is none free of that companie. And yet it is not for want of companie, there be enow of the trade. Besides, it is an ancient trade, it is a cunning trade, (a mysterie if you will) it is a gainfull trade, a sure trade. There be men rich, wise, and very sufficient euery way of the trade; for Masters, for Wardens, for what you will. Why then haue we not the Companie of Vsurers? I know no reason but only this, such men are ashamed of their pro­fession. We may say of them as S. Paul said of an heretike, that he is peruerted and sinneth, being condemned of his owne selfe. Tac. 3. 11.

If vsurie bee an honest trade, which men neede not be ashamed of, our Citie is much to blame in this: for there is no trade in it so poore and meane, if it be an honest trade, but hath a Companie. The labouring man, the Mason, the Tiler, the Water man, nay the tribe of Isaker, who carrieth burdens amongst vs, hath a marke to know, who belongeth to that sold: onely they haue excluded the Vsurer and the Broker. I said their owne hearts condemned them: me thinks the Citie condemnes them too. Is there no place for them? Nusquans est qui vbi (que). I pray God they be not of e­uery Companie. Yet if we be asked what the Vsurer is, we must answere as our Sauiour Christ speakes in the parable, that he is a certaine rich man, of no calling or profession; a certaine rich man, and that is all. Luk. 16. 19

2. That we may take a view of the borrowers, we doe sort them into foure rankes: First, if they be poore indeed, then is it miserable and palpable biting, the emphasis of Gods law stands vpon that. Such lending is to them like cold water powred vpon a seacoale fire, or as a shower of raine vpon a load of lime; though it may seeme to quench and coole, yet it kindleth and inflameth more and more.

[Page 103] If they be young gallants and prodigall persons, the Vsu­rers 2 lend, and they spend. Let them looke to their lands; let them beware of Dauids curse; Let the Noshec, that is, Psal. 109. the Vsurer catch all that he hath. Illaqueat foenerator omnia quae ei sunt. The spider lets them buzze and struggle till they be fast intangled, lands and all; and then hee sucketh them. One vse that God maketh of such Vsurers in this world, is to be a curse and a plague vnto riotous persons. A­gainst these two sorts of borrowers that schoole argument is demonstratiue, that the vse and propertie of the princi­pall be inseparable; that the principall is spent in the first vse: for these persons make but one vse of money. It is spent to them in the first vse; the poore for necessitie; the prodi­gall for wantonnes, doe send it packing, neuer to returne either in kinde or any equiualent.

A third sort of borrowers bee rich and well grounded men. A rich borrower? how doe these two agree? Doth the 3 Iob 6. 5. asse bray when hee hath prouender, or loweth the oxe when hee hath fodder? If such haue some present occasionall need (as the richest may haue) if thou canst spare it, lend in kindnes and neighbourhood, to receiue the like courtesie againe an other time. This in such a case, is consideration enough for a Christian, because the Heathen desired no more, but [...] for euen sinners (saith Christ) lend to sinners to receiue the like, Luk. 6. 34. the like kindnes another time vpon the like occasion. Hu­mane societie cannot stand without lending and borrow­ing, as S Basil notes. Wherefore hath God made men so­ciable creatures, but to helpe one another vpon such occa­sions? But to lend rich men to inrich themselues more, is to powre water into the sea; thou art therein no good ste­ward of Gods blessings, which hee hath giuen thee to dis­pose of. It is not good to feede a rich mans humour too much: thou maist giue him weapons to doe hurt withall: for he will gaine double or trebie at the least, and some bo­die must pay for that, who cannot so well spare it.

Besides, hee doth shustle thy stocke amongst so much wealth of his owne, that thou canst not gesse which way is [Page 104] goeth, or how it is imployed; which being thy goods thou must answere for, if thy care be not as great for the good imployment of thy money, as it is for the sure paiment thereof.

The last sort are of a midling fortune, or yong beginners, who make a poore shift, but are scarce able to manage their 4 trade, for want of money. Now are we come to the proper obiect of the second worke of charitie. For as free gift and almes belongeth to such poore people, as be not able to re­pay any thing backe againe; so free lending belongeth to such as these. Heere is place for bankes of Charitie, that tradesmen may haue free vse of money; only paying the officers fees, which is no vsurie. If thou canst spare it, thou maist doe well to pleasure such with a summe for a time freely, that God may blesse thee. Or if thou thinke so well of any of them to venture some stocke, by way of partner­ship; that way also thou maist profit thy selfe and them with a good conscience. Is there no way but plaine vsurie? If such young beginners cannot by such lawfull meanes be relieued, they must take it for their crosse, and be content to take paines in seruice vntill they can be masters of their trade: It may be God would not haue them to come vp so hastily as they desire. Good and lawfull meanes offered vnto vs, are as a sermon from heauen to declare what the good will and pleasure of God is.

3 For the Common-weale, it be commeth not a Church­man to say much. But this is obuious and plaine; that it is not good for a hiue to nourish drones; edenti, sedenti, dor­mtenti, &c. Let them eate, sleepe, sit, and play; doe what they will, the moneths goe out, and the money comes in. These be the kine of Bashan which feede vpon the Commons. Heare the word ye kine that are in the mountaine of Samaria, Amos 4. 1. which oppresse the poore, and destroy the needie. Nay they be like wormes and weapons, onely to deuoure; else what good doe they? For sooth they send out their money It is true; and that doth the Common weale pay deerely for; a hundred thousand pound for euery million, at the least. But [Page 105] were these men in their graues, their money would come more freely: their young frie would send it abroad com­monly most frankly, without penie of interest. And this is the special prouidence of God for the common good, who (as Pro. 28. 8 Salomon obserued) will bring it so about, that the V­surers money will abroad for the good of others. For if the Vsurer could make himselfe, as he maketh his principal, in­corruptible; wealth would quickly get into a few mens hands; which is the Rodin de rep. lib. 5. cap. 11. present bane of a Common-weale. The Vsurers money passeth from hand to hand like coun­ters, the standing boxe in the end would eate vp all: and then what calamities, tumults, and seditions must needes follow? If any can but hoise a standard, be he Dauid, or be he 2. Sam. 22 2. Absolon, such discontented persons as be so fast in the Vsurers bookes, will flocke, by force to redresse them­selues.

What lamentations in Nehem. 5 Nehemia his time for twelue in the hundred? What beggerie amongst Dr. Wil­son, fol. 186. Spaniards by the Genowaies, not withstanding their Indian trade? What gar­boiles in Aret. pro­blem, de vsura. Germanie by the Rusticks against Magistrates? What riots in Anno 37. Hen. 3. England by Christians against Iewes? What seditions in all Hieron. in Esa. 58. 6. Cities hath vsurie been the cause of?

So then which way so euer wee turne our selues; whe­ther wee looke vpon the Ioane, the Couenant, the lucre, in the thing it selfe: or whether we respect the parties, to wit, the Ʋsurer, the Borrower, or the Comminaltie, wee finde much iniquitie, but no iustice; much mischiefe, but no good at all.

CHAP. XVI. The seuenth argument, that it is vncharitable.

WHere we finde no iustice, what hope can there be of charitie? For first there is such a natu­rall antipathie betwixt vsurie and charitie, that they cannot possibly dwell together in one breast. Which is insinuated not obscure­ly by Salomon in the place before mentioned: He that in­creaseth Prou. 28. 8. his riches by vsurie and interest, gathereth them for him that will be mercifull to the poore. God by his vnsearch­able prouidence, will so dispose and order things, that the Vsurers wealth shall come into the hands of him who will be as mercifull as he was mercilesse. The antithesis of which Pro. 13. 22. place sheweth that the Vsurer wanteth the bowels of mer­cie, which good men haue. For as in the same booke he saith, the riches of sinners are laid vp for the iust: so the riches of the Vsurer are gathered for the mercifull. Where Salo­mon setteth mercie in opposition vnto vsurie. Wherefore vsurie may well be termed a biting: for as without, it biteth others; so in the heart of the Vsurer, it ateth out the very bowels of compassion. It is a principall branch of that roote of all euill, which rooteth vp the roote of charitie, strugling with it in the very conception of the heart, as Esau did with Iacob.

2 And as euen mentall vsurie doth naturally oppose it selfe to the affection of mercie and compassion, and there­by hardneth the heart of the Vsurer; so doth actuall vsurie likewise peruert the act of charitie, turning it into an act of selfeloue. That renowned act of lending, which bringeth Psal. 37. 26. an heauenly reward, and a blessing vpon posteritie, is by vsarie exposed to a most illiberall bargaine and sale: that which was ordained of God, by the Canon of that Chari­tie which seeketh not her owne, to respect the good of others; 1. Cor. 13. 5. Cap. 10. 24 is turned to his owne proper luere and gaine.

[Page 107] 3 Last of all, experience telleth vs that this practise of vsurie, by setting a price vpon lending, as vpon ware in a market, hath almost displaced free loane amongst men. So as a chiefe supposed patron of vsurie, Bucer himselfe, obser­ueth: In Psal. 15. Eò res abyt, vt impudens habeatur, quimutuum petit ci­tra foenoris oblationem: He is now counted an impudent fellow, who will offer to borrow money without proffe­ring consideration.

Thus haue I shewed briefly as I could, that vsurie is vn­to all doubtfull at the least, and therefore vnlawfull. If not, yet it is scandalous and offensiue; and therefore vnlawfull. It is forbidden by a law to which wee all stand bound in conscience, and therefore vnlawfull. I haue shewed it like­wise to be in it selfe vnnaturall; vngodly against hea­uen; vniust towards men; and vncharitable against the rules of mercie. Now if it be any of these, it is a sin; if it be all these, it is an abomination.

The end of the second Booke.
THE THIRD BOOKE ANSW …

THE THIRD BOOKE ANSWERETH SVCH motiues and proofes as are brought for Vsurie.

CHAP. I. Of the motiues and reasons which perswade men in this age that Vsurie should be lawfull.

AS it is in the bodily eye, so is it proportio­nably in the minde: except the apple or sight of the eye be void of all colour in it selfe, it cannot possiblie receiue co­lours or iudge of them: but looketh as through a painted glasse, colouring e­uery obiect like it selfe. In like manner, though I were able to fill my booke, as Iob did his mouth, with arguments; and to make each argument a demonstration against vsu­rie: yet so long as such cloudie conceites doe hang in the braines of men, which cast a dye and tincture vpon the vn­derstanding; all that can be said will not any way worke vpon them. Which imaginarie colours that they may the better be discerned, how they doe arise in mens mindes, and after may be more easily dispelled, I will place them in fiue seuerall rankes.

1 The first thing which offereth it selfe in these vsurious daies, is custome and example: which though it would not be admitted in Schoole for an Argument; yet it worketh admirablie vpon vulgar vnderstandings. For people being [Page 109] as Labans sheepe, lead by the eye, doe conceiue as they see. Seeing Vsurie therefore so much practised of all sorts; men are euen thereby without further examination much mo­ued to thinke it lawfull. And the rather considering the qualitie of those men who doe vse it: who bee not onely carth-wormes and meere worldlings; but men of very good respect amongst men, for their honest and vpright dealing; seeming very religious men, & zealous professors of the Gospell of Christ; whose tender consciences will sometimes rise at a very small offence. Now these lookers on do thinke themselues bound in charitie to beleeue, that such men as these would neuer venture their soules vpon this practise, had they not been well informed before, and fully resolued by good Diuines. Let them who doe vse it then be examined for their ground and warrant; you shall find that some of them haue resolued themselues out of their owne wit and iudgement. For albeit they dare not trust themselues with their owne bodies for physicke, (though happily they may haue some smackering of skill that way) neither dare they informe themselues without their learned counsell at law, for their goods and estate: yet the estate of their owne soules they dare vndertake themselues most confidently in matters of the greatest dif­ficultie and danger.

Others who be not so conceited of their owne diuinity, yet very willing to be perswaded of the lawfulnesse of that which is so profitable, doe take the very silence of some Ministers for a resolution; thinking as charitablie of vs for our silence, as others doe of them for their practise. For ob­seruing how friendly wee conuerse with them whom wee know to liue in that kind; how we receiue daily kindnesses from them; how zealous some of vs seeme to be for the re­formation of such things as concerne them & their soules, either nothing at all, or nothing so much as this: hereupon they presently resolue; verily if Vsury were so damnable as some suppose; these good mē, our special friends, would ne­uer suffer our soules to sleepe so securely in such danger.

[Page 110] Sometimes it may be they will moue the question by the way amongst other matters; and then shall you haue some pregnant wit, after a little studie vpon his trencher, re­turne a present resolution to their mind: That if it bee not Neshec, he can see no reason why it may not bee allowed. This Diuinity passeth frō table to table very currently, amongst those who very hartily wish it true. All this put together maketh one strong motiue in the minds of the people, for the lawfulnesse of Vsurie. First, the custome of it amongst vs (which taketh away the sense of sinne;) and the generall practise of it, euen amongst them of good note and reputa­tion. Secondly, our sluggish modesty in being ouer silent, and the conniuencie of such as are loth to disturbe or dis­please their friends. Last of all, those Echoes and quailpipes amongst vs, who catch friends by imitating their voice; re­turning answeres answerable to their desires. These things (I say) will easily driue men forward into a good opinion and practise of Vsurie, who are ready to runne of them­selues.

2 A second motiue ariseth out of pitie and humane commiseration towards some persons, who haue stockes of money, but want skill or power to imploy the same. This affection was the first hatcher of an Vsurers apologie a­mong exiles in time of persecution: which now is also ap­plied vnto Orphans and Widowes in time of peace. For were it not pitie that these should spend their stockes and con­sume them? Or that their stocks should be exposed by trust to the prey of strangers in these hungrie daies? Since God therefore hath giuen in charge so often in Scripture to pro­uide for the fatherlesse and widowes; is it not a safe way by this meanes to allot them a certainty for the vse of their moneyes, their principall being still preserued; they main­tained by the interest; and the Common-weale to enioy both the moneyes of them who want skill, and the skill of them who want money?

3 As by these motiues they would perswade; so in the third place they would bind vs by imposing a necessitie of [Page 111] Vsurie vpon towne and city; as if traffique and trading could not possiblie be maintained without it. It is not poa­ring vpon a booke that can determine this question. Alas (say they) can schollers, who bee hudwinckt, and brought vp within the walles of a Colledge, iudge of the state of a Citie? Let these bookish Clerks scribble what they list, we Citizens doe know that vsurie is necessarie: and if it be ne­cessarie, sure it was neuer Gods meaning to forbid it sim­plie. .1. Ioh. 5. 5. The Commandements of God are not grieuous.

4. After that these fantasies bee once setled in mens braines: first, that custome and the practise of good men must beget an apologie out of the charitable conceit of the vulgar: next, that that apologie must bee applied in pitie vnto certaine persons, who haue most need to be relieued by it: and then, that which is permitted to some, is in time apprehended of all sorts, as necessarie to whole incorpora­tions; so that Vsurie now must bee lawfull, there is no re­medie. Then in the fourth place, the wit of man must bee set on worke to spin out fine and subtill cases of Vsurie, wherein there shall appeare nothing but iustice and chari­tie: no wrong or iniurie vnto any. And heere they wil put vs to it indeed: It is an easie matter to cast a stone into a poole, which seuen wise men will hardly get out. How intricate cases both in law and equitie are multiplied daily, it is too euident: and if they can find out but one case of V­surie wherein enormity can hardly bee discerned; that one case will beget many cases like vnto it selfe. For the wit of man will worke like a moale to get into the earth. If it bee lawfull in one case, it shall be lawfull in many: else that one case shall be euery mans case to serue for a cloake.

5 Last of all, when they haue wrought thus farre; some, because they would excel, pretend proofe out of the sacred text of Scripture it selfe. I speake not of those reuerend Di­uines before mentioned; who, defending Vsurie, no Vsu­rie; doe onely mitigate and qualifie the rigour of the texts with some deuised distinctions. But there is a fellow of late time, who positiuely would proue Vsurie to be law­full, [Page 112] euen by the Scripture: wringing and wresting the text as if it would looke somthing that way; but very strangely. This passeth from hand to hand in writing only; for I hope he is ashamed to print it, because he is ashamed of his name: whereby it seemeth if he be not able to bee an Vsurer him­selfe; yet hee would faine bee like vnto them in somwhat. Vnto these fiue heads we may easily referre what euer hath been said with any colour, or may bee imagined in the de­fence of this sinne. Our last endeauour then must be, to dis­couer these in order; which to a single eye will easily ma­nifest themselues to be meere apparitions.

CHAP. II. An answere to the first motiue, taken from the common practise of Vsurie.

I Would not wish any so simple, as that the custome of any thing in these daies should moue him to thinke it lawfull. For if men shall degenerate as fast the next age, as they haue done within memorie of man; wee shall haue a de­luge of drunkennesse, and diuers enor­mities, not to be named amongst Christians. For the pra­ctise of the better sort, if charity rule thy iudgement, as it was propounded in the motiue; then thinke in charity: first, that thou maiest bee misinformed concerning these men. For it may be they may deale by way of partnership, or some other lawfull contract: and that these are drawne into the number, by such as being themselues downe­right Vsurers, would win credit to their trade, by reputing others like themselues.

Next, if it shall appeare in some to bee no false imputati­on, but too true (as I feare it is in too many) then the best couer we can make for them, is the same which charity it selfe made vpon the crosse for those grieuous sinners: [Page 113] Nesciunt quid faciunt: They know not what they doe. For Luk. 23. 34 I verily perswade my selfe in my soule, had some of them knowne how vnlawfull and dangerous a practise vsurie is, they would neuer haue ventured their soules vpon it. But as others are by their example, so were they by the example of others led into this common error. Vnto them there­fore especially let me addresse my speech; beseeching them euen as they tender their owne soules, to take notice how this kinde of ignorance will not excuse, but rather con­demne them, who haue so good meanes of better resolu­tion, if God would moue their hearts to seeke after it. Be well resolued then, before you practise; lest all turne vnto the greater sinne. Trust not your owne resolution in this case; Mamon is subtill to beguile you. Therefore be as diligent to take counsell for your soules in religion, as you are for your bodies in physicke, and for your goods in law. Be as carefull to make choice of your counsell in the one, as in the other; and desire no lesse securitie for your con­sciences in this question of vsurie, then you doe for your principall in the practise of it; and then will you respect both the abilitie and fidelitie of them with whom you deale. Abilitie of iudgement, that they be able to informe you; and fidelitie, to deale truly with your soules.

Neither let our silence incourage any to practise this sin. We would be glad that generall reprehensions out of the pulpit might suffice. Wee are loth to take Nathan his office vpon vs, and say, 2. Sam. 12. 7. Thou art the man, except wee had some speciall commission, as he had: It is a thanklesse office. Be­sides, we take notice of those crimes only which are writ­ten in mens foreheads, wee haue no warrant to examine your bookes of Accounts. Let the inquirie then come from your selues, giue vs incouragement to deale plainly, sincerely and directly with your consciences. If we be ouer soft and indulgent with you in that businesse, take no ad­uantage therefrom to the hurt of your soules; men of the best profession will be men, and not Angels. And for your better resolution in this particular, let me obserue vnto [Page 114] you, that vpon the best inquirie that I can make, I finde not any one Diuine, new or old, of what religion or sect soeuer, who hath euer passed the presse in this point: not any Di­uine, I say, (for Molinaeus was a Ciuilian,) who hath vnder­taken to examine this question: no not any of the supposed patrons of vsurie, who hath defended the same, as it is be­fore defined, and commonly practised with the greatest moderation, nine, eight, or seuen in the hundred. I did thinke at the first I should haue found some; and some I haue found who doe coast ouer neere vpon it; and some who do giue ouer much libertie in that kinde. Yet not any of thē (let Decad. 3. serm. 1. Bullinger go, who writeth no whit to our pur­pose; but most confusedly taketh & mistaketh vsurie for all commerce, in rents, reuenewes, bargaine and sale, merchan­dizing, &c.) not any, I say, who hath euer taken this que­stion in hand to sift and examine it; but in conclusion (their cautions, and limitations by them added, being likewise sifted and examined) their resolution is still contrarie to your ordinarie and most moderate practise. If any man therefore shall take you aside, as Peter did Christ, to fauour your dealings in this kinde; suspect that whispering to Matth. 26. 23. 24 sa­uour not the things that are of God, but the things that be of men.

CHAP. III. Answering the second motiue for Orphans, Widowes, and old men past trading.

FRom example we passe to affection; which is as blinde and peruerse in iudgement, as the other is powerfull to leade into error: the affection of pity and compassion, which of all others doth preuaile most euen amōg the better sort; because it seemeth to arise out of charitie. But charitie is no charitie if it oppose iustice. It is both a foolish and cruell pitie, which so tendreth the outward [Page 115] estate of any, to the hurt and preiudice of the soule. If vsu­rie (say they) be not lawfull for any to practise, alas what shall become of those Orphans and Widowes in these vn­iust daies, which haue stocks of money left vnto them, and want skill to employ the same? What shall become of them? By the helpe of God they may doe well. My greater care is, what shall become of those Orphans and Widowes in these vncharitable daies, which haue no stocks at all left vnto them: though I confesse both the one and the other are alike in this; that they be not so able to help themselues as others be. Therefore there bee no two estates amongst men, ouer whom God hath a more prouident and tender care, then ouer widowes and fatherlesse children. He hath prouided for them by a speciall law: Exod. 22. 22. Thou shalt not trouble any widow, or fatherlesse childe. His iudgements lie heauie vpon the transgressors of that law. Vers. 23. 24. If thou vex or trouble such, then my wrath shall be kindled, and I will kill you with the sword, and your wiues shall be widowes, and your children fa­therlesse. No one law more iterated by Deut. 10. 18. Cap. 14. 29 Cap. 18. 11 14. Cap. 24. 17 20. Moses, and fre­quently vrged by the Prophets, then this for the safegard of Orphans and widowes. Whom if mortall men shall neg­lect, God himselfe in his fatherly prouidence will bee their protector. Psal. 94. 6 Psal. 146. 9. Esa. 1. 17. 23. Cap. 10. 2. Iere. 5. 28. Cap. 7. 6. Cap. 12. 2. Zach. 7. 10. Mal. 3. 5. 2. King. 4. He is a father of the fatherlesse, and iudge of the widow, euen God in his holy habitation. Yea God would worke a miracle, rather then the poore widow of the sonne of the Prophets, with her two fatherlesse children, should want. The Sonne of God sheweth the like tender affection in denouncing a woe against such as Mat. 23. 14. deuoured widowes houses. And his Iam. 1. 27. Apostle Iames measureth pure religion and vndefiled before God euen the father, by charitie towards the fatherlesse and widowes.

Hath God then so many waies bound himselfe by pro­mise to prouide for widowes and Orphans; and shall these by vsurie withdraw themselues out of his fatherly proui­dence? Shall these be secured by vsurious contracts against the act of God himselfe? Verily God will take it more vn­kindly at their hands, then at any other. See the difference [Page 116] in this point betwixt the wisedome of the world, and of God. The world thinketh vsurie the best and the safest way for Orphans and widowes; because it doth secure them most from all casualties, which might fall vpon their stocks and estates, by any act either of God or man. The wisedome of God contrariwise is, that these persons should most of al cast their care vpon God; because he careth most of all for them. But of all practises vsurie doth most withdraw them from dependance vpon Gods fatherly prouidence, which best beseemeth their condition. If vsurie then be a thing vnlawfull, in case of Orphans it is most vnlawfull. And vn­doubtedly if Almightie God in wisedome had thought it meete to haue tolerated vsurie in these persons, he might as easily haue mentioned the same, as Deut. 23 19. he doth the toleration of lending to strangers. But it was so farre from Gods mea­ning, that in the very fame Exod. 22. 22, 23. 24. place where hee maketh a law for the safegard of Orphans and widowes, presently and Vers. 25. immediatly vpon it, is annexed the law against vsurie. Shal these then who are so well prouided for, by a speciall law of God, be transgressors of the very next law vnto it? God forbid. Let them not come neere vnto that transgres­sion of all other; let not them of all others come neere vn­to it.

Orphans are comming into the world; widowes, who intend so to continue, are going out of the world; and shall these two Ages, which of all others ought to be most ho­lie and heauenlie; the one for innocencie, and the other for deuotion, be stained with vsurie? Christ is Alpha and Omega vnto vs, the first and the last, the beginning and the end; and shal the alpha of our nonage, and the omega of our dotage be dedicated vnto vsurie?

1. Christ calleth himselfe by the name of a letter, the first letter in the Alphabet, that children might learne Christ so soone as they be able to know their letters; and shall wee suffer our children to bee died in the wooll of their infancie, with the scarlet sinne of vsurie? The Rom. 8. 15 spi­rit of Adoption teacheth vs, to crie Abba father. Abba is [Page 117] the Bucer. in Rom. 8. vers. 15. Abba Pa­ter, & li­beuter au­diunt pa­tres, & pu­eri primùm sonare dis­cunt. first word that children can naturally pronounce, as if God delighted to bee called Father in the childs lan­guage. Shall earthly fathers then prouide no otherwise for their babes so deerely beloued of God, but by the contagi­ous sinne of Vsurie? Stampe garlicke in a new morter, and it will smell of it euer after: giue the diuell possession of a child, and he will be be remoued with great difficultie. For when the Mark. 9. 20. Disciples of Christ could not cast him out, when Christ himselfe saw with what extremitie hee came forth; with what wallowing, foming, and renting of the possessed; he demanded how long that had happened vnto him: An­swere was made; of a child. Bee it farre from parents and gouernours to giue Satan such aduantage ouer innocents; as to feed and nourish them; to maintaine and bring them vp by the increase of Vsurie.

2 I write vnto you widowes, who professe your selues now in your latter age to leaue the world, and betake your selues to God; to be so married vnto your onely husband Christ, as that you may quietly and peaceablie say your prayers; heare Sermons; reade your Bibles; and liue vpon Vsurie: tell vs in the name of God, where haue you learned thus to ioyne God and Mamon together. Looke into those Bibles which you reade; euen that which carieth the name of Geneua; which translation in respect of the place should seeme most to fauour you in this point: there haue you all the termes: Exod. 22. 25. Vsurie; Prou. 28. 8. Interest; Ezec. 18. 13. Increase; Vers. 8. any in­crease, distinctly expressed; yet not any of them in any place mentioned, but vtterly condemned, absolutely for­bidden amongst the people of God, without any distincti­on, difference, toleration, or qualification at all: Looke in­to your owne estate and condition. I will suppose that your husbands in their life time did themselues imploy their stocks in honest and lawful trading, submitting themselues to all lawfull aduentures: somtimes enduring great loste with patience; somtimes gaining much, as it pleased God to blesse them. Since their decease during the time of your widowhood, by this trade of Vsurie, diuers of you haue at­tained [Page 118] vnto farre greater wealth then your husbands them­selues euer could. This you cannot denie to bee most true. Your answere is, you doe thanke God for it, it is his bles­sing: whereof I do make great doubt; and so would I wish you to doe. Is it not strange that a sillie woman not able to manage her owne estate, depriued of her honest and wise guide and head, should thriue better, with greater ease and security, then her husband with the same or better meanes euer could? If this came by any extraordinarie blessing of God vpon you; I would lift my hands to heauen with you, praising God in his wonderfull works. But if it be knowne to come by the ordinarie trade of Vsurie; I would suspect that not to be of God: for God hath ordained your wi­dowhood in respect of your former estate, to bee an estate of humiliation, for the outward condition of this life. But contrary to this ordinance of God, you can make it, by the practise of Vsurie, to be an estate of exaltation: for where­as in your husband his daies, your stocke by his honest and painefull negotiation, was subiect vnto manifold perils; and by perill vnto great and daily losses: your widowes vocation can prouide by sufficient bonds against all these, with great increase of gaine: bonds so sufficient and abso­lute, that vnlesse God dissolue them beyond all expecta­tion (as somtimes he doth) your resolute purpose is, to be secured against any act both of God and man.

Giue me leaue to deale plainely with you, and to vse the Luk. 10. 34. Samaritans sharpe wine as well as oyle for the scouring and curing of this wound. Looke vnto your charge, whom God hath made Stewards of your stocke of money. It is you who stand answerable before God for the vse or abuse of such summes as you put forth into the hands of others: where you gaine ten in the hundreth, they must gain twen­tie cleere, besides many charges and duties to bee paid out of their gaine. How doe you silly women know who is oppressed or bitten by such gaine? You will say that you commit it into the hands of such as you hope to be honest conscionable men: for they keepe touch, and pay you your [Page 119] money: They be neither ingrossers, nor forestallers, nor op­pressors, nor vnreasonable gainers; but honest and religi­ous men: for they deale honestly, and pay you your money. Tell me then, if they be such honest conscionable men that you deale withall, why dare you not trust them to imploy your money for you by way of partnership; allowing them a proportion of gaine for their skill and care, and bearing answerably part of the losse? Dare you trust them with your soule, in that wherein your selues stand answerable vnto God; and not with the vse of your goods for your owne profit? I beseech you meditate seriously vpon these things, which are sensible; let the tendernesse of your sexe worke vnto a remorse in this point; take it to heart; bee troubled in conscience for this sinne: Mordeat hic vt mo­riatur illic. Bern. Let the worme bite here, that it may die elsewhere.

If you should bee troubled, I imagine presently what comfort shall bee applied. Your children, kinsfolkes, or friends who haue aduised you to this trade (wherein you haue not been well aduised) will bid you send for such or such, who be reuerend and graue Diuines; such as loue you wel. Be it so then; euen vnto those reuerend and graue Diuines dare I appeale for your case: conferre with them; desire them to deale plainely with your soule; to search the wound to the bottome; and I make no doubt, but they wil tell you: First, that the text of Scripture is directly against you: Next, that those distinctions and interpretations which seeme to qualifie the matter, are but the comments of some few learned men, who differ from the rest, and a­mong themselues; according to the variety of their se­uerall apprehensions. Lastly, they can tell you, that euen those Diuines who seeme most of all to fauour you; their cautions and limitations being added, doe all of them con­clude directly against that which you practise.

And if there bee any who shall vse nothing but oyle to heale vp your present griefe, and draw a skin ouer it, with such indulgent toleration of Interest as you desire; in the name of God take heed of such; suppose them to be sowers [Page 120] of Pillowes. It is dangerous to relie vpon them, who giue most liberty in the matters of deceitfull mamon.

3 I write vnto you old men, who decaying in the po­wers of mind and body, are forced to leaue your trade, and doe aske what you shall doe; who hauing got some mo­ney together in a lawfull calling, are not able to follow it any longer? Doe you aske Diuines what you shall doe for the world? We must aske that counsell of you; we can tell what you must not doe. Is there no fruit in the garden, but onely the forbidden fruit? Haue you spent your strength and worne your senses, to liue at ease without labour when you are old; and haue you not taken some care for the ease of conscience, how to liue without sin when you are old? Will you intangle your soules with the practise of Vsurie, when you haue one foot in the graue? Hath God blessed your labours in youth; and will you forsake him in age? Will you pollute your soules with filthie lucre, when you should be most consecrated to deuotion?

Euery man in his calling is a Steward; the decay of sen­ses and memorie is an admonition that hee must giue ouer Luk. 16. 1. his Stewardship. Then he consulteth with himselfe what to do. Vers. 3. Fodere nescio, mendicare erubesco: Take paines he can­not, those daies bee past; to spend vpon the stocke will bring him to beggerie: at the last he concludes: Vers. 4. I know what I will doe; that I may turne an hundred into an hun­dred and ten. Verily I commend such a man as our Sauiour commended the vniust Steward, Vers. 8. because he hath done wise­ly: wisely, in making choice of so easie and secure a gaine, fit for his age: of so great and certaine gaine, fit for such se­niors, who bee attentiores ad rem; Vers. 8. for the children of this world be wiser in their generations, then the children of light: wiser then the Patriarchs and Prophets of the old Testa­ment: wiser then the Apostles and Euangelists of the new Testament: Wiser then the Fathers and Councels of succee­ding ages: wiser then any of the Saints of God that liued in former times: for wee cannot reade of any of them who had the wit, either to practise Vsurie themselues; or by [Page 121] any distinction to approoue of it, or finde it lawfull in o­thers.

CHAP. IIII. Answering the supposed necessitie of Vsurie.

NEcessitie is lawlesse. If Vsurers therefore can put on that coate, it will bee armour of proofe against all proofe by argument; a­gainst all statute and law both of God and man. They doe pretend that the state of the Citie cannot stand; that traffick cannot be maintained; that tradesmen cannot liue without it. Then verily it was neuer Gods meaning to lay so heauie a yoake vpon his people in forbidding that which is so necessarie. The right putting of the case will giue great light to the cleering of the point: whereof there be three branches.

1 I demaund first of those tradesmen, who cannot liue in their trade without taking vp at interest: Is their mea­ning that they cannot liue in that fashion as they doe; maintaine their wiues in those fashions that they doe; driue their trades to that height which they doe? If this be the case, the answere is easie: It may bee God would not haue them carrie so great a saile as they doe, but to drinke of the waters of their owne well, and content themselues with Prou. 5. 15. such meanes as Gods fatherly prouidence doth offer them; there is no necessitie for a man to inrich himselfe by such practises, as be either forbidden or doubtfull. Better is a Prou. 15. 16 little with the feare of the Lord, then great treasure with trou­ble; trouble of conscience at the houre of death. Thus farre wee doe agree. Whosoeuer laieth this for his ground, that He will be rich, must insnare his conscience with many ne­cessarie euils, whereof vsurie is one. Necessarie, I say, not to a religious honest man, who is content with his estate; but to him who resolueth he will be rich: for they that will be 1. Tim. 6. 9 rich (saith the Apostle) fall into temptations and snares, which drowne men in perdition and destruction.

[Page 122] 2 If it bee propounded, that trade and commerce be­tweene man and man cannot bee maintained in this Citie without borrowing and lending; that also is granted: [...]: Common societie and mutuall conuersation (saith S. Basil) doth require it of ne­cessitie. Gods law did euer intend that men should lend one to another; in charitie to the poore; in friendship to their equals, to receiue the like courtesie againe. Which dutie if Luk. 6. 13. [...]. men would performe, there were no necessitie of vsurie.

3 The third point then followeth. Presupposing the cu­stome and corruption of these times wherein men will not lend freely as they ought; is there not a necessitie of vsurie? Admit that be granted; who did impose this necessitie? If God; then is this reason good, Vsurie is necessarie, therefore lawfull. But if men or estates haue drawne a necessitie of sin­ning vpon themselues by the custome of sinne; doth this extenuate or aggrauate the fault? Woe be vnto them (saith the Prophet Esay) who draw sinne, as with cart-ropes. Cities Esa. 5. 18. and Incorporations haue drawne a necessitie of this sinne vpon themselues by three strong cart-ropes of iniquitie. First, the hardnes of mens hearts, and want of charitie in those who be well able to lend and will not, haue forced many to pay vsurie Secondly, the couetous desire and pride of borrowers, who out of an insatiable appetite to com­passe great matters, doe take vp great summes of money, for money; that no money is to bee spared for such as bee true borrowers indeede. Woe vnto them that ioyne land to Esa. 5. 8. land, till there be no place for the poore to dwell in. That is the Countrie woe. But vpon the same ground, it is inferred: Woe vnto them who ioyne money to money, till there be none left for the poore to borrow. This is the Citie woe; which bring­eth a necessitie of borrowing vpon interest. Thirdly, false­hood and deceit in defrauding one another of their mo­nies at the times appointed, so as being disappointed of their owne, they are compelled to take vp of others, or to shut vp their doores. These three fold cart-ropes, not easily broken, haue drawne a necessitie of vsurie vpon Cities. And [Page 123] shall it therefore be reputed no sinne? God forbid: It is no good consequence neither in persons nor estates.

Not in persons. S. Paul telleth vs of an heart that cannot Rom. 2. 5. repent, which heapeth vnto it selfe wrath against the day of wrath. Is impenitencie in that heart no sinne, because cu­stome hath made it necessarie?

A drunkard hath brought his bodie into such an habite, that vnlesse hee drinke bountifully, euen to the turning of his braine, he is sick againe. Is not drunkennes in that per­son sinfull, because so necessarie? A proud woman hath bin wedded so long vnto her will, that if she be crossed in it, she will goe mad for pride, like Nebuchadnezar; or die of moo­dines, like a weesell in a cage. Shall her wilfulnesse be excu­sed, because her diuellish stomack is growne too strong for her wit?

The time was when amongst the borderers, to liue vpon robbing and the spoile of their neighbours was a common trade: so as stealing was thought to be no sinne: but the 8. Commandement by them was deemed to be of King Hen­ry his putting in. Their reason was, for because that pra­ctise was so generall and so vsuall, as hee who made scruple to doe therein as others did, was himselfe made a pray vn­to others. It must needs bee granted, that the necessitie of stealing amongst them, was greater by many degrees, then the necessitie of vsurie can bee in any Countrie or Citie whatsoeuer. And yet I make no question, but if the greatest Vsurer in the land had been Iudge amongst them, he would euen then haue condemned their theft, to bee against the law both of God and man: and condemned them also for making themselues such slaues vnto that sinne by their bar­barous and vnciuill practises. I haue learned better man­ners then to compare our Vsurers with those borderers: For our vsurie, without comparison, is a farre more ciuill and mannerly theft then theirs euer was. Only my desire is, that they would be pleased to take notice of the weaknesse of this argument: that we must therefore needs allow of vsu­rie, because they haue made it necessarie. That they would [Page 124] leaue those questions, What shall we doe in this, and that, and the other case? As if a good honest borderer being bred and borne amongst them, should complaine; alas what should I doe! all my goods and cattell are carried and driuen away in one night, I wot not whither; I must either shift for my self, as the fashion is, or run my countrie, or starue at home. I hope in God this argument will neuer be so strong for v­surie amongst vs, as it hath been for theft amongst them: God forbid it should And yet theft and robberie hath euer been a great sinne, euen where it hath been most necessarie. In conclusion, that wee may not depriue necessitie of her right; she hath power to excuse the borrower, if she be vr­gent vpon him and cannot be preuented. The borrower, I say, may lawfully giue vsurie, where incuitable occasion shall inforce an inuincible necessitie. If hee borrow not to gaine by borrowing, but to preuent a greater losse: If o­ther lawfull meanes be wanting, either for the preseruation of his credit and estate; or for the supplie of present wants, either of nature or person: If these occasions bee imposed and not drawne vpon him, by some former negligence or default: If he attempt to borrow no more then he shall be able to repay at the time; and if vpon such occasions hee cannot borrow freely, then is he no agent in the sinne, but a meere patient in the oppression of vsurie. But in case he may borrow freely, and will not, out of a scornefull desire not to be beholding; or will disable himself by couenants, which he is no waies able to performe; or relieue himselfe by grating vpon others for excessiue gaine; or pull these snares vpon himselfe, either by liuing at too high a rate, or by improuident imploying of his stock, without reseruing a due proportion to defray charges and pay duties: in these cases euen the borrower himselfe may stand guiltie as ac­cessarie to this sinne. And well is hee who can manage his estate with that prouident moderation, as hee may say with the Prophet Ieremie, as we reade, chap. 15. 16. I haue neither lent vpon vsurie, nor men haue lent to me vpon vsurie. But for the lender, which is the Vsurer, there is no colour or pre­tence [Page 125] of any such necessitie, which can befall him; seeing he hath authoritie from God as Steward of his blessings; and power amongst men as owner of his money; for varie­tie of lawfull and vndoubted imployments.

CHAP. V. Of such cases as seeme vsurious, without appearance of iniquitie, or breach of charitie.

HE that turneth himselfe into an angell of light, can set so faire a glosse vpon a worke of darknes, that the iniquitie of it will hard­ly be discerned. He can so cun­ningly twist good and euill to­gether, that the appearance of vsurie shall be presented with­out shew of vniustice. These sub­till sleights do rather exercise the wit in vnfolding of them, then conuince a iudicious vnderstanding; that vsury should therefore be lawfull, because some cases be intricate. Be not all Courts of iustice and equitie full of such difficulties, where after long pleading and much debating, the wrong and vniustice is hardly discouered? He that shall heare our learned at the Law vpon the Statute of Vsurie, at their Rea­dings, or otherwise, put and argue cases; what is within the meaning of the statute, and what not; will neuer maruell at the close conueiance of vniustice in the cunning practi­ses of this age. And may not the like Quaeries be put what is within the meaning of the receiued definition of vsurie? Admit you may puzzle vs with some Cases so cunningly contriued, wherein we can finde no difference either in Iu­stice or Charitie from other lawfull contracts: It may be our bluntnes, who cannot pierce a hard case; or if no ex­ception can be taken, wee shall parallel it with another quaere, whether it be within the definition of vsurie before [Page 126] expressed or not? So that vpon the matter, if it appeare iust and lawfull, it shall not appeare vsurious. It may happily border and coast vpon Vsurie; yet our conclusion shall still remaine intire: That Vsurie properly so called is simply un­lawfull.

For our better direction amongst these difficulties, I will propound three rules; which being applied vnto particu­lar cases, may inlighten vs for the vnfolding of the same.

1 First, That which is good and lawfull, must bee intire. A little enormitie doth peruert the whole action, as leuen sowreth the lumpe. I speake not of such infirmities which hu­maine 1. Cor. 5. 6. frailtie doth cast vpon our deeds; for so our best actions be vnperfect: but all the ingrediences which be es­sentiall, must bee iust and lawfull, else the act it selfe is not iustifiable. It is in morality, as in Logicke, the conclusion followeth the worst part. If the least part of iniquitie appeare in any action morall, we thence conclude that action to be vnlawfull.

My neighbour is ready to forfeit his land, being mor­gaged to a mercilesse man, who gapeth for a prey: I lend him an hundred pound for a yeer to redeem the same land, being of triple value: I couenant with him for so much in­terest as I am like to bee admnified for want of my money. Heere is iustice and mercy met together. I in mercy haue relieued my neighbour in his distresse; hee in equitie doth saue me harmelesse: no man receiucth wrong; neither is the common-wealth any waies preiudiced: The borro­wer onely is redeemed from the mouth of the Lion: and though I take nine or ten pound interest of him, it is but as the opening of a veine to stench a greater fluxe, by turning the course of blood: wherein it is a soueraign thing to part with a little goodblood, to preuent a greater mischiefe.

In this case all circumstances considered, there seemeth to be that [...], or equalitie, which the Apostle maketh the ground both of Col. 4. 1. Iustice, and 2. Cor. 8. 14. Charity. But there is one e­normitie which marreth all the rest; in that a worke of charity is brought to the market, and set at a price; then [Page 127] which there is nothing more offensiue or opposite to the nature of charity; which will haue all her deeds to be most free. To expell one poyson with another, or to preuent a greater euill by a lesse, holdeth well in physicke: But in Di­uinity we must not doe euill, either that good may come of it, or that euill may be preuented by it. In peccatis error facit di­lemma: It is an erroneous conceit to imagine that one euill cannot be auoided but by committing of an other. But if thou lend thy neighbor for his reliefe in this case, it may be thoushalt be damnified, for want of thy money, more then thy estate can well beare. Be it so: yet for all that, make no absolute couenant for interest vpon what may be; for it may be God will pay thy interest some other way within the reuolution of that yeere. If not: yet as thy damage being future is casual; so let thy couenant be conditional: If thou be thus or thus damnified, that then such or such satisfaction be made. This is equall and iust interest, but no Vsurie.

The portion of an Orphan is put into the hands of a Company or Corporation: the principall is fully secured: the child brought vp and maintained by the interest: That interest so easie as none hath iust cause to complaine of bi­ting: many sutors for the imployment of such stockes: A custome maintained by the indulgence of the starute: the onely Vsurie which our law doth leaue vnpunished: what vniustice then can there bee imputed to this practise? Or what offence is it either to God or man? Verily I must greatly commend your wisdome and prouidence in taking such a fatherly care for Orphans in so peruerse and croo­ked a generation. I must likewise most willingly subscribe to the graue moderation of our law, which hath passed o­uer this practise of Townes and Cities, and let it alone: (for a toleration is all that from the law can bee inferred.) Not­withstanding by your gentle patience, when the best is made of it that can be, there is one thing in this which poi­soneth all. You haue so disposed of Orphans goods by this order, that they be in farre better condition for their estate, then they could haue been by the painfull labors and ho­nest [Page 128] indeuours of their most wise and prouident Fathers, if they had been liuing; in whose hands their portion had then been subiect to negotiation, by that vnto perill; by pe­rill to decay: this you hold to be a great vertue. Indeed it is too great for a vertue, which must euer hold a meane.

That order and practise which maketh Orphans no Or­phans, by yeelding them a greater securitie of principall and certaintie of gaine, then God hath ordained, must needs be a thing inordinate in it selfe. And, which is worse, by this meanes Almightie God is turned out of office, by securing Orphans, euen against the act of God himselfe, who would be a father of the fatherlesse. For this Vsurie hath prouided a farre better fatherhood and more secure protection vpon earth for fatherlesse children, then their owne naturall fathers by their best industrie, could haue blessed them withal. Let the goods of an Orphan, on Gods name, by your faithfull administration, be of equall condi­tion in the hand of a Company or Corporation, as it should haue been in the hand of a faithfull father: and this suffi­ceth, vnlesse it proceed out of your free bountie; else what­whatsoeuer is more then this, by way of administration, commeth of euill. This I write out of precise truth; lea­uing this your practise within the rule of toleranda, non pro­banda. Let vs then esteeme of it as a thing tolerable, yet with the acknowledgement of some blemish.

2 Our secondrule is, that the poyson of Vsurie is in some contracts so closely and cunningly conueyed, as the very turne of the intention of the mind may alter the case, to make it iust or vniust, the contract remaining one and the same.

If the eye then be single, and the intention right, that which formally is vsurious, vpon the matter may in iustice be equiualent to a lawfull contract. If the intention looke awry, that which in forme is lawfull, may in matter bee a paliat or cloaked Vsurie.

For A. to lend vnto B. an hundred pound for ten yeeres, the principall to be repayed yeerely by ten pound, and ten pound ouer and aboue to be giuen for the vse; this is plaine [Page 129] Vsurie within the statute. Therefore to preuent that sta­tute, and to auoide this practise of an Vsurer, A. doth pur­chase of the said B. an annuall rent of twentie pound, for ten yeeres, with the same hundred pound. This is bargaine and sale; yet vpon the matter the very same vnder another forme of couenant: the very intention maketh it Vsurie; insomuch as if the intent could be discouered, by any pre­cedent communication of borrowing, or other pregnant circumstances, ths law would bring it within compasse of the statute for paliate or cloaked Vsury. But if simply with­out any pretence such annuity of rent be bought and sold, we cannot condemne it for Vsurie. Howbeit, if it be an vn­reasonable bargaine, or be iniurious vnto any by circum­stances, it may bee a breach of iustice and charitic in an o­ther kind.

A man buyeth a piece of land at a reasonable rate for ready money; couenanting that in case hee shall repent of his purchase within one yeere after the payment of the mo­ney, that then at the yeeres end it shall be at his choice, ei­ther to retaine the land and continue his bargaine, or to haue that intire summe repaid backe againe, which he gaue for the land; and so the bargaine to be void. This case heth so indifferent betweene an vsurious and a lawfull contract, that the very secret purpose and intention of the buyer doth alter it. For if the buyer had a simple intent to pur­chase the land indeed; yet desirous to reserue a liberty to himselfe, by one yeeres triall of his bargaine; and though at the yeeres end he shall take his money againe, for some in­conuenience found, which before was not perceiued; or because in the meane time hee hath met with some other bargaine fitter for him; this is neither Vsurie, nor vsurious. But if this buyer hauing this summe of money, which pre­sently he cannot put to Vsurie, with so good securitie as he would; doth therefore make this purchase but a colour, ne­uer intending to continue his bargaine, but onely to keepe the land as a pawne for his principall; and to receiue that yeeres rent for the vse; this very intention maketh it grosse [Page 130] Vsurie; and so altereth the case: the contract in words and in writing remaining one and the same.

3 Our third rule is: That hee who deliuereth a summe of money for a time, for some speciall designement couenanted and agreed vpon, declineth the nature of that loane, which in the definition is properly called mutuation. For in mutuation the money is so lent, that the propertie is wholly passed ouer to the borrower. But when it is lent onely for such an im­ployment, the gaine whereof shall redound aswell to the lender as the borrower; herein the lender doth reserue vnto himselfe some propertie in the money so lent, euen du­ring the time of the loane. Which kind of loane doth bend the couenant somwhat from the nature of Vsurie, towards the contract of partnership: whereupon some couenants seeming vsurious, yet withall appearing iust and equal, are great inducements to make some men thinke that all Vsury is not simplie vnlawfull. Whereof instance may be giuen in such and such cases: whereas indeed vpon due examina­tion it may appeare, that as such contracts doe begin to bee iustifiable; so doe they likewise decline the nature of Vsu­rie, in some part of the definition before expressed.

A moneyed man lendeth to his monilesse friend an hun­dred pound, not to vse at his pleasure, but to purchase such a lease for ten yeeres, which yeeldeth twentie foure pound of yeerely rent: couenanting with the borrower for nine pound a yeere parcell of the said rent, and for the payment of the principall, being likewise raised out of the said yeer­ly rent at the end of ten yeeres. Now what can there bee in this contract against any rule either of iustice or charitie? The purchase is reasonable; the interest redounding to the lender is a reasonable portion of the borrowers gaine; the borrower hath ten pound yeerely comming in, which in ten yeeres maketh vp the principall; he hath likewise the vse of that yeerely rent of ten pound freely for ten yeeres, and fiue pound certaine rent ouerplus of cleere gaine. This seemeth to bee Vsurie, for that it passeth vnder the vsuall termes of lending and borrowing. But vpon the matter it is [Page 131] rather a contract of societie or partnership, for that the pro­per obiect of vsurie mutuum, doth here cease. For a summe of money so deliuered, is not properly lent: for that the len­der continueth in part the owner of the money, reseruing some power and interest in the vse of the same. In these and such like couenants, if there bee any malignitie in the nature, or scandall in the forme; it proceedeth of vsurie. If any colour of equitie and iustice; it borroweth that from some honest and lawfull contract.

But let euerie bird take his owne feather, euery neighbour contract resume that which is proper and peculiar to it self, that the nakednes of vsurie might appeare by itself; I make little question but the malignitie & deformitie of it would easily be perceiued. For so farre as these mixt contracts doe put on the habit of honestie, they doe withall relinquish and put off the nature of vsurie.

These cases I haue only propounded, to shew that as any vsurious contract doth approch vnto equitie; so farre forth it doth likewise decline the nature of vsurie, and bend itself towards some lawfull and honest couenant, which doth only coast vpon it. All which doth still fortifie the maine conclusion, That vsurie properly so called, is simply vnlawfull; and that there is still some malignant qualitie in the very nature of it: which together with vsurie, according to the seuerall degrees thereof, will discouer it selfe.

CHAP. VI. Answering some reasons and wrestings of Scripture for Ʋsurie.

THis Chapter is chiefly to be bent against the author of an English Treatise, who in this kinde of argument is singular by himselfe. Wherein I shall make the more speed, because he hath been here­tofore By Doctor Dounham in Psal. 15. worthily refuted, so much of him as was thought worthie the rehearsing. If any therefore [Page 132] who hath seene that manuscript, bee in loue with his long discourse of Mashah and Nashah, and other vagrant con­ceits, I referre him for his better satisfaction to the said Pag. 197. &c. p. [...]77. &c. p. [...]2. &c. p 284. &c. p. [...]89. &c. from 291. vnto 309. Answere.

That which most did trouble me in the perusing of the said discourse, was the number of reasons prouing the law­fulnes of vsurie: for I told 32. numbred together in one place by figures in the margent; besides diuers others scat­tered out of order in other places. And verily if arguments might passe by number and not by weight, I should haue been much dismaied. But vpon examination I was bold, for being tedious, to reckon them as they doe siphers in the practise of addition, nought, nought, and nought is nought; for 25. of those 32. reasons doe inferre these conclusions following.

That increase is lawfull: and that a man ought not to let his money take rust. That he needeth not to lend freelie to him who hath no neede to borrow; because that were to powre water into the Sea. That a iust recompence is due for the satisfaction of wrong: as if a man falsifie his word to my hindrance; if hee withhold my money against my will to my losse and his gaine; if he delay payment beyond the time limited, so as I am forced to take vp at tenne in the hundred; if I stand bound for a friend for principall and in­terest, he saileth and I pay it; if a father in law withhold his daughters portion to their preiudice; that in these ca­ses some recompence is due. That the purchase of a see­simple, or of an Annuitie for liues, is lawfull. That partner­ship is not to be misliked. That a rich man ought not to in­crease his wealth by a poore mans money; nor the tutor by the orphans stocke, without some consideration. That a man pleasured by the loane of money, ought to be thank­full. That a Miller may require a Bakers custome for len­ding him summes of money, &c.

Herein the author hath taken great paines to be labour his owne shadow: for I know none who maketh any que­stion of the lawfulnes of these things. The other seuen rea­sons [Page 133] doe seeme as it were somewhat to looke towards the point in question.

If a poore man ought to bee thankefull in word for the 1 loane of money, then ought the rich man to be really thankefull in his kinde. It is very true, and what then? Then (saith the author) may he couenant or promise to be thankefull, if it be his dutie so to be. I make no doubt but that hee may promise and performe his promise, much better then a poore man can; many other waies beside paying of vsurie. But had he proued it lawful for a rich man to be eight or tenne pound thankfull for the loane of an hundred, then had he appro­ched neere the question.

It is all one to lend money and to lend a Cow freely: 2 therfore (saith he) it is all one to let money and to let a Cow for hire. I denie the consequence; many things may bee lent freely, which may not be let for hire: a quart of milke, gi­uen by that Cow, may be lent, but not let. A Cow is worse for the milking, so is not money for the vsing, which shall be repaied in as currant peeces as it was lent.

But the argument which hee standeth much vpon, is 3 Gods owne example: Who paieth interest for the poore, and therefore the rich ought to pay for themselues. God paieth it for the poore, because they be not able to pay for themselues: the rich therefore ought to pay for themselues, because they be able. So that vsurie then must needes be paid either by God or man; by God for the poore, by the rich for themselues. Another reason to the same purpose: That wee must lend to the poore freely, and therefore must we take vsurie of the rich. 4 Vpon this ground (it seemeth) because God will not pay for the rich, therefore they must pay for themselues. For it will not out of his head, but that vsurie must be paied. Were it not for vsurie, he prophecieth, that the same confusion must 5 needs fall vpon vs, which the Prophet Esatas threatneth against Chap. 24. ver. 1. 2. 3. 4 wicked and cursed nations. That is another reason. Nay: If vsurie be taken away, woe worth all the occupiers in the world. 6 That is another reason. Adde them all together; they bee assertions, prophecies, execrations, which say and asseuer, [Page 134] but prooue nothing. For Gods example for paying vsurie for the poore, is taken from a metaphoricall or borrowed speech, and therefore cannot stand vpon his owne ground. If it could, we might inferre strange conclusions from Gods example; who returneth for giuing to the poore the prin­cipall, seuen fold, yea an hundred fold. Shall a rich man therefore pay so much vsurie? that would prooue a Neshec indeeed. Yea, but we must lend freely to the poore; and there­fore that we may inable our selues so to doe, we must take vsurie 7 of the rich. That is another reason, taken (as I suppose) from Standgate hole. For such reasons doe moue those good fel­lowes to take a purse, that they may bee the better able to doe this and that; some of them purposing to doe some good with that they shall take. Yet all this will not make their act good, if themselues be taken.

§. 2.

By these reasons alreadie alleaged it is to bee hoped, though they be many, that this author is not much to bee feared for doing the cause any great hurt. Albeit hee hath presumed further in this theame then any I can finde euer did before, or I hope will do after him; in laying such vio­lent hands vpon the booke of God; wresting that holie writ for the approbation, yea and the great commenda­tion of vsurie. Being of the number of those whereof Ter­tullian speaketh: Qui Caedem faciunt scripturarum in mate­riam suam: Who doe fell the Scriptures to support a rotten building.

First, in the Lebanon of the old Testament, hee hath hewne downe that worthie example of Ioseph: who as a­gent for Pharao King of Egypt, deliuered to his subiects Genes. 47. 20. 24. (now become his seruants) not onely the vse of the land, but seed-corne also to sow the same; couenanting with them for the fifth part of yeerly rent to the King their Lord and master for euer. And verily the Egyptians in this case sat at an easie rent, paying but the fifth part, and enioying all the rest, onely for their paines in tilling the land; which by reason of Nilus was a very tender mold, that men might [Page 135] water it with their feet; and therefore their tillage was no tough labour. But how is Vsurie built vpon this? What af­finitie hath this rent with interest? Forsooth you must vn­derstand, that all maner of contract, couenant, or bargaine whatsoeuer it be, is by him taken for Vsurie. If it be vniust or oppressing, then it is Neshec: which it pleaseth him to translate morsurie, not vsurie. If it bee equall and iust (as this of Iosephs was) then is it conscionable and lawfull Vsurie: in which sense, where [...], is by Ezek. 18. 8. all translators read, that giueth not to Vsurie, nor taketh increase: he turneth it, To giue to Morsurie, or take a cutting rent. So other places likewise, where those tearmes are to bee found, are by him very singularly expounded by the racking of lands and tenements, in such sort as tenants cannot liue.

And all those texts of Scripture which do warrant either Gen. 23. 16. purchasing, or Leuit. 25. 15. Prou. 31. 16. Ezec. 21. 27. Reu. 18. 15 Exod. 2:. 15. Luk. 19. 12 Iam. 5. 4. Decad. 3. serm. 1. Deut. 15. 2. merchandizing, or c letting, or lending, or tri­bute, or any contract of gaine, are by him cut down to build vp Vsurie: so as if any shall be so vnmanerly as to put any difference between these contracts and Vsurie; then is all this great paines of his vtterly lost. Wondring with my selfe who should put these extrauagant conceits into his head; at the last I found them in Bullinger, vpon whom it seemeth hee groundeth himselfe; a moist foundation to build vpon. For the same purpose the same Author maketh much of Gods law for the releasing of debtors the seuenth yeere; because poore men, for the Sabbath of the ground that yeere, wanted meanes to pay their debts: yet of them who were able to pay, it might be exacted. Behold (saith he) the rich man must pay principall and vsurie both the seuenth Vers. 4. yeere; but not the poore: for there is the word Mashah, which signifieth vsurie; and the verbe Nashah, which signifieth to lend vpon vsurie. Oportet mendacem esse memorem. Doth God release the poore, that Vsurie shall not bee exacted of them for that seuenth yeere? Vsurie, I say, by vertue of your Mashah? then shall it bee lawfull other yeeres to exact it, euen of the poore; whom alone you labour to free from V­surie. [Page 136] For doubtlesse that law did bind onely for the se­uenth yeere, and no longer time: the poore therefore will con you little thankes for this argument.

Yea but it is a prettie reason which hee hath framed out of Salomons prouerbs: He that oppresseth the poore to increase Pro. 22. 16. himselfe, and giueth to the rich, shall surely come to pouerty. He noteth in the margent (a notable place to proue that the rich ought to giue interest.) How is that proued? By the rule of contraries; as if Salomon contrariwise had said thus: Hee that giueth to the poore freely, and lendeth to the rich to en­crease himselfe, shal vndoubtedly attaine vnto great wealth. In­deed, To attaine wealth, and to come vnto pouerty, be contra­ries. Besides, I conceiue some antithesis betwixt oppressing the poore to encrease himselfe; and giuing vnto the poore freely. Now lending to the rich vpon vsurie, hath crouded in the midst. How lending commeth in, passeth my vnderstanding: there is no mention in the text either of Vsurie or loane. To giue to the rich in bribes, that hee may oppresse the poore, is a vice; or to oppresse the poore, that hee may the better giue vnto the rich: but is it therefore a vertue to lend to the rich vpon Vsurie? and such a vertue as bringeth a blessing from God in stead of a curse? So saith the Author in direct tearmes: Now the contrary vertue hath questionles the like opposite blessing, an equall and like reward of plentious­nesse. This is more, I dare say, then euer Vsurers did hope for, or imagine: full glad would they be, if we could proue it a thing indifferent. To lend freely is a worke of mercy and bountie: to lend vnto the rich freely is vitious; be­cause superfluous: he compareth it to powring water into the sea; yet to lend to the rich vpon Vsurie, makes it very com­mendable. A notable place to proue Ʋsurie? A notable wit that can extract Vsurie out of such a place. For I dare say when Salomon spake this prouerbe, he thought no more of any such vertue, then he did of Alchymie.

From Prouerbs descend we vnto Parables. Parables and metaphors make fit groundcels for such buildings. Our S. Christ in his parable of Talents, compareth the dispensation Mat. 25. 27 [Page 137] and vse of spirituall gifts and graces, to the imployment of moneyes amongst worldlings; where a rich man deliue­reth summes to certaine occupiers, that hee might receiue his principall againe, cum foenore, with Vsurie, or aduan­tage. [...]. Now it is verily thought, Christ would neuer haue made such comparisons, if Vsurie were not lawfull and honest.

And I pray you, what honestie doe you find in the sud­den breaking in of a theefe into a mans house in the night? Mat. 24. 43 yet Christ compareth his last comming euen vnto that. Nay more, what if the master had commended his seruant in this parable for dispensing his talents, as the Lord commended the vniust Steward for his wisdome? Then might it safely haue been concluded, that it is as lawfull and commenda­ble a thing to take Vsury, as for that Steward to robbe his master, and both alike. Nay, so farre is this parable from iustifying of Vsurers; that were it not a parable, I would haue vsed it as an argument against Vsurie. For whereas the seruant complaineth of his master, as of an hard man, reaping where he sowed not, and gathering where he strowed not (para­bles being spoken after the fashion of the world,) it should appeare that Vsurers in those times were hardly thought of, euen of meere worldly men, for reaping increase more then they sowed, out of talents and peeces of money, which haue no power of fructifying in themselues.

That consequent which commonly is inferred from the rule of equitie, set downe by Christ, Whatsoeuer you would that men should doe vnto you, doe you the same vnto them, and therefore I may lawfully take so much vsurie of my neigh­bour, as I my selfe in his case would giue; is but a begging of the question: for it must be vnderstood of a iust and re­ctified will; else it can be no rule. If I pretend that I doe no otherwise vnto him then my self in his case would be done vnto; we runne still vpon the question, whether my desire were then as it should be? For if I my selfe would borrow vpon vsurie, either to ingrosse or forestall, or to compasse some vnlawfull matter, this is a corrupt will and no rule. [Page 138] But if my desire to borrow bee iust and lawfull (as in some cases before mentioned it may be) then is it no entire will; but mixt and forced by some necessity, for the auoiding of a greater euill; and therefore deemed in the eye both of H [...]tom, de Vtur. [...]5. law and [...]st. Eth. 1. 1. reason to be no will at all. Hee that would bor­row, should haue need to borrow; for a needlesse desire is vnlawfull: And hee who hath need to borrow, would not willingly borrow but for need; much lesse would hee pay Vsurie, if with conuenience he might borrow freely. Ther­fore the will of the borrower is in this case either corrupt, or no will at all; and so consequently without the compasse of Christ his rule.

Come wee now to the argument of arguments, hatched onely by this Author himselfe; whereupon hee hath bestowed great cost and paines to bring it vnto perfe­ction; sitting vpon it for three leaues together in large fo­lio. It is grounded vpon Iohn Baptist his answere to the Publicans: Require no more then that which is appointed vn­to Luk. 3. 13. you. Marke the text well; for here commeth an argument wil make Vsurers to laugh and keepe holy day. The Author will demonstrate out of these very words (which a man would little think at the first) that Iohn Baptist did allow V­surie at twelue in the hundred: a rate which our statute law would punish with the forfeiture of principall and all. Now good Lord what a thing is this; that humane lawes in­acted only to loppe and prune the supersluitie of mens acti­ons, should be more strict and seuere then the doctrine of Iohn Baptist in the wildernesse; who laid the axe to the root, cutting downe sinne, and burning vp iniquitie with the spirit of Elias? Twelue in the hundred, with a quicker returne then ordinarie: not sixe moneths, but Centesima is it called, that is, one in the hundred monethly, which Iohn Baptisi hath iustified.

And to proue the same, he bringeth a long discourse out of Tullie, both for the approbation of Centesima, and for the great honour and estimation that the Publicans were in amongst the Romanes, who had not only authoritie to ga­ther [Page 139] tribute, customes, and publike reuenues; but also to employ them for the publike good. By reason whereof they practised the Centesima then allowed by the Romanes. These Publicans comming to Iohn Baptist, and demanding what they should do; Iohn bad them require no more then that which was appointed them. But the practise of Cen­tesima was allowed vnto Publicans, by the Romane lawes; and therefore approued of by Iohn, in his answere to their question. This in briefe is the very dint of his whole argu­ment.

We will not fall out about the premisses. First, be it gran­ted that the Centesima was allowed of by Heathenish lawes in Tullie his time amongst the Romanes; and amongst the Grecians before them; and among the Persians in the daies of Nehemias. Secondly, neither can it bee denied but the Chap. 5. Publicans were much honoured in their place while they liued; and for their good seruices had their Images after death erected in Rome with a [...]. Thirdly, wee confesse likewise that such Publicans had the imployment of tributes, customes and publike reuenues for the best behoofe of the Common-wealth: and hereby hauing great store of money in likelihood, were great practisers of vsu­rie both for the publike and their owne priuate commo­dities.

But what of all this? Before that Iohn Baptist his answere doe make any thing to your purpose, two points must bee proued, which lie yet vntouched. First, that those Publi­cans who came to Iohn his baptisme, had the like place, of­fice and authoritie for publike goods, as those whereof Tullie writeth. Secondly, you must prooue likewise, that this vsurie was an essentiall part of a Publicans office; else this text will conclude nothing for you. These haue you wisely passed ouer in silence; for I doubt you would much haue failed in the proofe of both.

The Romane Publicans had no small power committed to them for the weale publike, when Orat. pro on. Plancio. Tullie testifieth, that Flos equitum Romanorum, ornamentum ciuitatis, firmamen­tum [Page 140] reipub. Publicanorum ordine continetur. But the Publi­cans which Iohn Bap. spake with in Iordan, were Iewes, and not Romanes, as is agreed by Hieron. epist 146. ad Damas. old and Bez. annot. in Mat. 9. 10. new Interpretors. Mat. 9. 10 For Christ himselfe, who came after Iohn, was not sent, neither would send his Disciples, but vnto the lost sheepe of the house of Israel. Matthew an Apostle, and therefore a Iew, was a Publican: and so were many other Iewes who sat with Christ at meate. Now these Iewish Publicans were as much debased, as the other were honoured. Abased a­mongst the Iewes, because they were Publicans: and a­mongst the Romanes, because they were Iewes. These were hired to assist the Publicans in collecting of customes, or, at the most, they farmed the same of the Romanes; and did exact an ouerplus what they could get, for themselues: but for imploying the Emperors money in vsurie, or otherwise; the Romanes would looke to that themselues: as appea­reth by that which Plinie writeth to Traian the Emperour, Paecuniae publicae Domine prouidentiâ tuâ & minister to nostro, &c. By what warrant then can you conferre this charge vp­on Iewish Publicans, which were but hirelings to the Ro­manes; Qui operā suam ad exactionem tributorum Romanis locabat. Beza in Mat. 9. 10. the chiefe of them but factors of tole and tribute? who as for their office they were hated of their owne na­tion; so for their extreame exactions and forged cauilla­tions, were they iustly reputed for infamous sinners. Some of these Publicans comming vnto Iohn Baptist, and being touched by his doctrine with a remorse, desired saluation amongst the rest: yet doubting whether their profession was capable, asked; What shall wee doe? Iohn doth not bid them giue ouer their calling, or cease to be Publicans: be­cause although it seemed an odious thing to the Iewes, that those of their owne nation should serue the vncircumcised, for the abridgement of their libertie; who thought them­selues so free: yet since tribute was due vnto Caesar, the office of gathering tribute could not be vnlawfull. But the coue­tous exacting of more then was due (being the common fault of Publicans) was the thing which Iohn Baptist would reforme in those words, Require no more then is appointed [Page 141] vnto you. Is not this agreed to be the simple meaning of the text? What haue wee then to doe with Centesima, or any kind of Vsurie in this place? Our Sauiour Christ doth te­stifie Luk. 6. 34. of these kind of people, that they would lend freely to their friends without Vsury, for the like againe. Yet I will not denie but these in all likelihood would also take Vsu­rie: for men of their liues would make little conscience, be­fore their conuersion, either of Vsurie or any other crime. What then? must Iohn Baptist needs approue all such faults as he doth not expresse? He nominateth that only which is most pertinent and proper to the office of a Publican: in­cluding the rest in his generall exhortations: wherein Saint Luke testifieth that Iohn spake many moe things then bee Luk. 3. 18. written. The exaction of more in the name of tribute or custome by forged cauillation then of right was due, was the crime of Publicans. But was it their onely fault? were the souldiers giuen to no other offences then those which Iohn did specifie? was there want of no other vertue among the people, then that one which Iohn by name doth com­mend vnto them? These kinde of arguments bee too too slight; and I feare I must incurre the greatest blame my self, for standing too long about them.

CHAP. VII. Arecapitulation, with an inforcement of the premisses.

NOw (Christian Reader) let vs aduise toge­ther in cold blood, for a Christian resolu­tion, what is to be done in the case of vsu­rie. 2. Booke, chap. 24. sect. 2. 3. 3. Booke. chap. 1. For what hath been said by way of argument on either side, wee haue heard. What I haue read, or can imagine may with any colour be alleaged in defence of it, hath been vr­ged with the best probabilitie that I can: for I had ra­ther giue then take aduantage in this kinde. But alas, wee [Page 142] 2. Booke, cap. 2. sect. 2. 3. 4. 3. Booke, chap. 23. 4. 5. 6. see the best probabilities are but as figge leaues, shapen by the deuice of some few indulgent wits; to couer the na­kednesse of that, which the law of God, of nature and of equitie hath discouered to bee deformed and shamefull in it selfe.

For the text of Scripture in the letter it selfe wee finde no question to be made. For albeit some haue put interpre­tations and senses vpon the text, according to the fashion and varietie of conceit and apprehension (a thing practised for all opinions;) yet is it granted that the letter doth euery where condemne vsurie, both in the originall, and mani­fold translations, euen vnder the tearme of increase and o­uerplus, the most harmelesse tearme that is, or can be giuen vnto it. Not any sentence of Scripture which mentioneth vsurie, but condemneth it, without exception, distinction, limitation, qualification, dispensation, or toleration a­mongst the people of God.

If wee remoue from the text to the 2. Booke, chap. 3. 4. 5 authoritie of Inter­pretors; I suppose wee might truly auerre that, concerning this question, which the most impudēt aduersarie that euer the Church had, durst neuer pretend for his assertion: That there was neuer any Church or Churchman, carrying the name of a Christian, who hath defended in writing any branch of vsurie, for the space of fifteene hundred yeeres after Christ. Neither was this for want of occasion giuen; for it hath been both practised and written against in all ages. Neither can wee with modestie impute it to the ig­norance of the Church: for as she is acknowledged to be most eagle-sighted in the time of her puritie; so when she was ouershadowed with superstition, her writers in cases of conscience for matters of moralitie were most exact; as by their schoole Diuinitie is euident to be seene. Yet where shall wee finde any one, for so many ages of the Church, who could euer deuise a distinction to saue an Vsurers soule?

About the time of Luther, this mystery of iniquity began 2. Booke, c. 6. sect. 1. a little to worke, but very cunningly cloaked vnder a new [Page 143] contract tearmed the contract of Redemption: the very tole­ration wherof by the pope was reckoned by Martin Luther amongst the notes of Antichrist; so odious was Vsurie vn­to him.

Afterwards many Christians of reformed Churches be­ing 2. Booke, chap. 7. vrged to fly for persecution, and to conuert their goods into money, yet wanting skill to imploy the same in a strange countrie; tender hearts thought it pitie that Vsurie in such a case were not lawfull; and nimble wits began to search, if the matter might not be so handled, and qualifi­ed by cautions and limitations, that some such thing as that we call Vsurie might be practised. For such is the subtilty of Satan, that if he cannot hinder the growth of good corne, yet tares shall grow vp with it. He thought that when men were so busied about the reforming of those grosse abuses of superstition; that then was the onely time to begin a new seed-plot of Vsurie, of Sacriledge, of liberty and pro­fanenes in the other extreme. Which vices, howsoeuer they were little feared or thought vpon in those daies; yet by this time we may easily perceiue to what ripenesse they bee growne, which then were but as seedes vnder the ground.

And that reuerend Diuine, Master Caluin, who was so 2. Booke, chap. 7. timorous to satisfie his friend by epistle, in moderating this point of Vsurie; as if hee would haue cursed the times wherein such occasion was giuen: I perswade my selfe if hee had then imagined what aduantage would after haue been taken of that little somwhat which there was said in fauour of Vsurie; that the dearest friend in the world should ne­uer haue moued him to haue moued pen to paper in that kind. But alas, what is that which is deliuered by him, and those few Diuines who ioyne with him in that assertion, whereupon a man may resolue? Nay, Tantum abest vt islud a te pro edicto ant axio­mate babe­ri velim, velin co plane ac­quiescere. saith Caluin, be it far from thee to resolue vpon that which I write in this kind. But admit a man will resolue more confidently vpon that which he then thought, then he himselfe could: Admit he wil venture his soule vpon whatsoeuer hath dropped at any [Page 144] time from that mans pen occasionally; what is that which hee and the rest haue deliuered, when they haue written most fauourablie for Vsurie? If it be demanded whether it bee lawfull to take interest for the vse or loane of money; answere is returned by those supposed Patrons of Vsurie, that for ought they can see, it may bee lawfull so to doe; if we make no trade of it, but once or twice vpon occasion, and vse it not. If then, we deale no worse with our brother, Calu. epist. de Vsura. then we would in the like case bee dealt withall our selues: If we take it not of any who by pouerty is vrged to borrow: If the taking of it doe not any waies hinder the free loane to him that needeth: If the interest be but halfe of the bor­rowers gaine at the most: If we looke that the Common-weale be not bitten or preiudiced thereby: Virel Chatechis. precept. 8. If our Vsurie exceed not that which the lawes doe tolerate where wee dwell: Iunius in Leuit. fine. Zanch. in epist. od E­phes. cap. 4. 8. Hemingius in Psal. 15. If the borrower besprinkle the creditor with some part of his increase, rather out of his voluntarie thankful­nesse, then by way of exaction: If the lender bee content to beare part of the borrowers losse, as well as of his gaine: If in case the principall doe miscarie without the borro­wers fault, we a bee content not onely to remit the princi­pall with the Vsurie, but to lend him afresh: Put all these Ifs together, and here is a peece of Vsurie which was neuer practised since the world stood, nor neuer will. And yet these be the cautions of the greatest patrons of Vsurie that euer writ. After they haue examined the point, and answe­red, as they thinke, the reasons which are vsually brought against Vsurie by the schoole; yet in conclusion put al their limitations together, they agree vpon no Vsurie at all, as it is before defined. Single them out one from another; there is not any one of them who dares defend any such ordinary Vsury, as is amōgst vs practised with y greatest moderation.

Alas poore simple soules, who haue receiued it by tradi­tion I know not how, and do verily perswade themselues, that many very reucrend Diuines haue in their writings defended ten in the hundred to be very lawful. Let the case then be put after the common intendment of the world: A [Page 145] lay man commeth to a Diuine and tels him; Sir, I haue a summe of money lying by me and little skill to imploy it: I know diuers would bee glad to borrow it, and giue mee good security. May I not lawfully put it to vse for eight, nine or ten in the hundred, without so many ifs? I am no States man to know when, or how the Common-wealth is bitten or preiudiced by Vsurie: Neither can I tell what the borrowers gaine or losse is; he may deceiue me easily, or be­ly himselfe, that he may borrow still: besides, I doe not loue to prie into other mens affaires, how they thriue. If hee gaine with my money, I shall be very glad; if he lose, it shal not be my fault; for I will not entreate him to borrow it: onely my desire is to be sure of mine owne with quietnesse, and some certaine moderate increase for my money, vntill I know how to imploy it otherwaies my selfe. Let this bee the case: I haue not met with one Diuine, new or old, ex­tant in print, who hath taken this question in hand to sift and examine, that durst yet determine this, or any other equiualent or like vnto this, to be lawfull.

Now if there bee any who doe animate their priuate friends to such practises, I cannot better resemble them then to those pestilent Heretikes, the Carpocratians, wher­of De prae­script. ad­uers. Haer. Tertullian and Irenaeus write, who said the Apostles committed onely vulgar points of doctrine to writing, re­seruing certaine secret positiōs to be imparted to their spe­ciall friends, who were perfect and able to receiue such vn­written 2. Booke, chap. 24. Apostolos ita tradi­disse dignis tantum. verities, as were by tradition to bee deliuered to some few. Now if there bee any such concealed truth con­cerning Vsurie, which none must know but our speciall friends who haue grace to vse it well; I would to God it might be reuealed, together with the grounds whereupon it is built; that men may not runne their consciences blin­fold in these practises vpon their owne destruction: thin­king themselues in a good way, without any warrant either from sound reason or good authority.

§. 2.

As for authority, so likewise for reason, I haue done my [Page 146] poore endeauours to enquire after the grounds of this point; and haue found: First, that authority is so strong a­gainst the lawfulnesse of Vsurie, as that no man of modesty 2. Booke, chap. 10. but will pawse and make question of it; and therefore to him it must be vnlawfull, because doubtfull.

Next, that it is, and euer hath been of ill report; and 2. Booke, chap. 11. therefore among Christians vnlawfull: because it causeth the enemy abrode to blaspheme our profession; and is scan­dalous to our brethren at home.

2. Booke, chap. 12. Thirdly, that our statute law now in force simplie for­bidding all Vsurie, or ouerplus for any loane whatsoeuer, being a wholesome and good law without exception, is to be obeyed by vertue of Gods law, euen for conscience sake. In the pursuit of which argument, as I haue presumed to set downe what I conceiue concerning the force of this penal statute of Vsury: so haue I touched as necessarily incident to the same purpose, the binding power of humane lawes in generall. Wherein that I be not mistaken, vnderstand me to haue taken a middle way, betweene two assertions, both which seeme to me extreme. First, the Concil. Trident. sess. 24. de sacram. matrimon. can. 3. Church of Rome, that shee might tyrannize ouer mens consciences at her pleasure, hath vsurped a power, not onely to dispence with the expresse law of God; but in place thereof to create new lawes, which shall haue equal binding power ouer the con­science with Gods law. For the better establishing of which vsurpation, some of her flatterers doe extend this binding to all humane lawes whatsoeuer: making no dif­ference betwixt them and the law of God in this; but that the law of God and of man doe both alike bind the consci­ence. So be their words. * Lex humana & diuina quoad obli­gationem Belarm. Tom. 1. part. 2, de laicis. lib. 3. cap. 11. non differunt: vtraque enim obligat in conscientia, nunc ad mortale, nunc ad veniale peccatum, prorerum ipsarum grauitate. Which assertion, if it should take place, I see no reason but that we of the Clergie should stand bound to studie and teach the people the Ciuill and Canon lawes of our countrie, as well as the law of God; seeing their con­sciences doe stand equally bound to both alike, which to [Page 147] imagine were grosse impiety. Another sort there be who Gerson. lib. de vita spirituali, sect. 4. Almainus, quaest. 1. de potestate Eccles. cap. 12. Ʋasquius, quaest. 12. 14. 29. doe auerre, that we are not any whit bound in conscience to humane lawes from the authority commanding, but meerely from the matter commanded: So as if the thing in­acted by law be not contained within the law of God or nature, it is no sinne before God to transgresse that statute. Humane lawes (say they) bee nothing, to the conscience, but onely interpretations of lawes diuine and naturall. So as a subiect doth offend in transgressing a law, no other­wise then a patient in breaking the rule of diet prescribed by the Physition: wherein hee doth offend God, not for disobeying the precept of the Physition; but for transgres­sing the rule of good health, which now is made manifest to him by the Physitions skil. In like maner, humane lawes doe onely manifest and prescribe that which in conscience we were bound to obey before.

Now as the former assertion doth derogate from the Ma­iestie of Diuine law which is due vnto it: so doth this ouer­much weaken that ordinance of God, which he hath esta­blished amongst men. In medio tutissimus ibis.

We haue therefore chosen the middle way, to wit, that men stand bound in conscience to obey good and whole­some lawes, not only from the nature of the thing enacted, but also in matters meerely indifferent, both because the generall obseruation thereof is auailable for the publicke good (which in charity we are bound to respect:) And al­so because we must bee subiect to that authority which is the ordinance of God. Rom. 13. vers. 5. Subiect, I say, not onely in suffring the penaltie which the Apostle tearmeth wrath, but in o­beying of lawfull commands, euen for conscience sake: for conscience sake, not because of any humane authority, (which of it selfe hath no command at all ouer the inward man) but onely by vertue of Gods law, which comman­deth vs to obey authority: so as if wee shall willingly and wittingly transgresse; we shall sinne against God. Admit then that Vsurie were a thing in it selfe indifferent: yet haue we in England a bond lying vpon vs more then other [Page 148] nations in regard of our positiue law: Not onely Ex ipsa legis vtilitate, as Stapleton would haue it; but in respect Contro­uer. 5. de potest. Eccl. circa leges morum. q. [...]. art. 2. expl. of our subiection vnto a lawfull commanding authority, as it is the ordinance of God.

Hauing enquired yet further into the nature of vsurious gaine, we haue found it to be most remote from that natu­rall and most innocent increase which God established and instituted amongst men: for that, money is not onely bar­ren 2. Booke, chap. 13. by nature, being a thing meerely artificiall; but also void of all immediate vse in it selfe to the possessor while he doth enioy it: So as the borrower giueth hire for the vse of that whereof he can haue no vse but in disbursing of it, and parting from it: and the lender taketh hire for the vse of that, which vnto him can neither weare in the vsing, nor be worse for the wearing. And which is yet more vnkind; the more this gaine doth increase and multiplie, the more it may; contrary to all other increase both of nature, and mans industrie.

Helping our eyesight by the rules of piety and godli­nesse, 2. Booke, chap. 14. wee haue further found it to be an vngodly gaine, which is assured against euery act of God, as Vsurie is. For albeit in wisedome we must secure our selues by all lawfull meanes against earthly casualties, and the fraud of men: yet notwithstanding in religion we ought most willingly to depend vpon Diuine prouidence for our gaine, acknow­ledging all our profit and increase to bee the blessing of God.

And as the first table hath condemned vsurie of im­pietie, 2. Booke, chap. 15. sect. 1. so hath the second conuinced it to be most vniust. Vniust euery way. It takes hire for loane, and setteth to sale that most liberall and free act of charitie. It passeth ouer by couenant all the hazard of the principal, and yet taketh hire for the vse of the same, against the equitie of Gods law, which saith, the borrower must not make that good which came Exod. 22. 15. for hire. It receiueth great gaine without labour; cleere gaine without cost; certaine gaine without perill; out of the industrie, the charges, the meere vncertainties of the [Page 149] borrower. 2. Booke, c. 15. sect. 2. All the parties whom vsurie doth any waies concerne, haue condemned it to bee most wicked and o­dious. The Vsurers themselues are ashamed of their pro­fession: the townes and cities where they dwell, dare not iustifie the trade, either of vsurie or brokage; but doe suffer the practise in secret only, as a worke of darknes. All sorts of borrowers condemne it, as being a cruell biting to the poore; a cursed snare to the prodigall; an instrument of oppression to rich borrowers; depriuing them also who be of a midling fortune, of that most bountifull worke of charitie (free loane) which vnto them is most proper and peculiar. The Common-weale, and in it the poore people, may rue the time, that euer the least vsurie was left vnpu­nished; for their purse in the end must pay for all.

Yet for all this, if charitie might heale where iniquitie 2. Booke, chap. 16. doth wound, it were the more tolerable. But vsurie as it peruerteth iustice euery way; so doth it drie vp the verie fountaine of charitie, being naturally opposite thereunto; turning euery thing to lucre and gaine, and straitning the bowels of compassion, which otherwise would dilate themselues, not onely in free giuing, but especially in libe­rall lending, where money for a time might be spared.

§. 3.

These points haue been proued in their seuerall places; what must be the conclusion then out of al these premisses? Charitie, Iustice, Pietie, Nature her selfe; the lawes of God, and of men; all authoritie ancient and moderne, ioyning their forces against the Vsurer, how can hee stand, inuiro­ned with such a cloude of witnesses; or iustifie his consci­ence against the day of triall?

Yet few men there be in these daies who haue a remorse of this sinne, or doe take it to heart: their consciences be seared as with a hot iron, there is such a thick skin growne ouer their hearts, as they will hardly be circumcised in this point. Which senselesse stupiditie may easily be perceiued to proceed originally from three principall causes.

1 First, the generall practise of vsurie makes euery one [Page 150] in particular to thinke that hee shall shift with his consci­ence, as well as others. Lord haue mercie vpon vs (saith he) if it be such a matter to take vsurie, what shall become of such, and such, who I am sure haue as good soules to God as I? I purpose not therefore to trouble my head for that matter. I pray God I haue no greater sinnes to answere for, and then I hope I shall doe well.

See the efficacie and power of example, when it growes common. It was placed before in the first ranke of motiues, perswading men that vsurie was lawfull, because it is so common. Now albeit example be too weake a reason to inferre any such conclusion; I hope euen in the estimate of the weakest iudgement: yet thus farre it doth preuaile with many, to keepe their consciences from any great touch in this point; for they resolue themselues vndoubtedly, that it cannot be so hainous a sinne, which is so generall a pra­ctise amongst them of good account. Ah fearefull tempta­tion, thus to be drawne into sinne by imitation! It was that which turned so many legions of Angels into Diuels, to see the brighter and more glorious spirits, leaue their station by disobedience. But did that mitigate Gods wrath to­wards Iude 6. them of inferiour ranke? Habet ordo diuinae iustitiae, &c. Diuine iustice required that they who were drawne into the same fall, should be inwrapped in the same con­demnation. When there were but two in all the world to transgresse, concerning that only forbidden fruit, the ex­ample Gen. 3. 6. of the one inticed the other. It was that which brought fire and brimstone vpon those goodly cities of the plaine, when abomination grew so commonly practised, Gen. 19. 4. from the young euen to the old, that one drew another from the highest to the lowest. Nay so forcible was this tempta­tion, that a branch of vnnaturall sinne escaped the fire of Sodom, and light in a caue of the mountaine: thus the ge­nerall example of Sodom infected the familie of iust Lot. But did that extenuate the fault? Nothing lesse. Moab was the father of the Moabites, and Ben-ammi of the Ammonites, for many generations. Vers. 38.

[Page 151] 2 Secondly, men take occasion from the question of v­surie, euen because it is a question, to arme themselues a­gainst all remorse and touch of conscience. For if they can once heare that it is questionable, they assume a libertie to themselues to chuse a side, and to practise according to that opinion which likes them best. But the grossenes of their error doth herein appeare; that vnderstanding Diuines to be somewhat diuided about vsurie, they doe presently imagine the point in question to bee this; whether the ta­king of nine, or tenne in the hundred, according to our or­dinarie practise, be lawfull. But alas, there is no such que­stion amongst Diuines to be found in all their writings. I haue sought with all diligence my selfe; I haue enquired of others; and vpon examination, I finde not any published vpon this argument, who discussing this point doth defend any such thing. Many questions we haue; what is vsurie, and what not. Some there be who defend certaine shreds of vsurie, euen to the rasing of the definition; whose reasons we haue met withall in their Pag. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 14. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 47. 99. 104. and the whole 3. Booke. places. Some also of the Ie­suiticall brood (who to humour the people for their purpo­ses, will dispense with any thing) haue hatched new deui­ces, how to defend profit by money, as good as vsurie euery whit, and yet no vsurie: cunningly twisted of three lawfull contracts; of the contract of societie, or partnership, and two kinds of assurances with the same partie: defended by Bononiae. Io. Eckius, and notably discussed at Ann. 1581 Rome by many lear­ned Doctors, in my presence, saith Disput. 5. q. 24. deso­cietate punct. 2. Gregorie de Valentiâ. A notable point no doubt, and well worthie the discussing. So faine would those Diuines giue the world some con­tentment for this practise of vsurie; that since they cannot with any face defend the old, they would be glad to create a new. But for an absolute couenant for tenne, nine, or eight in the hundred, according to the custome of Cities, amongst Diuines of any Church, I cannot yet finde a pa­tron.

3 But the third & last impediment, which hindreth men from taking of this sinne to heart, is of all others the most [Page 152] fearefull to be thought vpon, and yet I feare mee most a­uailable. When men be once seasoned with Vsurie, & haue entangled themselues in the same by any setled practise; they be after afraid to call it into question for disquieting their consciences. But blessed is that disquietnesse, which procureth eternall peace: and cursed bee that senselesse peace, which bringeth euerlasting torment. A sinfull soule must be disturbed here or elsewhere, there is no remedie: If we iudge not our selues before, we shall be iudged hereaf­ter, when it will be too late to finde mercie. Can men hope for mercie vnder a pretence of ignorance in this point? Verily if it were an inuincible ignorance, God in mercie would passe it ouer, as he doth many other things, where the meanes of better information is wanting: But if it bee an affected and wilfull ignorance, it addeth sinne vnto sin. Now what is more affected then to decline and auoid the meanes of instruction and resolution, onely because they will not disturbe and awaken their consciences out of so sweete a sleepe of securitie, for so sweete a gaine as vsurie? If hee did nothing but sleepe out his moneths, the moneys would come in.

Wee doe accuse some obstinate Recusants of wilfull blindnes, because they doe refuse the meanes of better in­struction: yet the most wilfull amongst them can say thus much for themselues, that many learned men, and the Church of Rome for many ages, haue defended their cause. Which apologie of theirs, though vpon due exa­mination it bee nothing; yet is it much more then euer could be said for vsurie. For though the practise of it can plead antiquitie, nothing more; yet was there neuer any Church, Orthodox, or Hereticall, which euer defended the same since the world stood. In some places it hath been tolerated. Tolerated, I say, and therefore not approoued of in any wise. As Master Beza for Geneua hath well obser­ued: Annotat. in Mat. 19. 8. Foenerari prohibet Christiana charitas: foenus tamen propter hominum commercia multi magistratus vident se simpliciter prohibere non posse. Itaque (quod vnum reliquum [Page 153] est) foeneris modum certum constituunt. An vero propterea foenerari bonâ conscientiá licet? Minimè profectò. Ne (que) enim ex legibus, sed ex dei verbo petenda est conscientiae regula. Imo ne ciuiles quidem leges probant, sed damnant potius, quod dun­taxat tolerant, cogente hominum improbitate: Christian cha­ritie doth condemne vsurie: yet notwithstanding in re­gard of the entercourse of merchandize, or commerce be­tweene man and man, many Magistrates doe perceiue, how they cannot simply inhibit the same, therefore (that which remaineth only for them to doe) they stint and limit vsurie. But may a man therefore take vsurie with a good consci­ence? No verily (saith Beza) for the rule of conscience is to be taken, not from the ciuill lawes of men, but from the word of God. Yea the Ciuill lawes themselues, do not ap­proue, but rather condemne, that which they tolerate only, being vrged thereunto by the wickednesse of men. These be the very words of that famous Pastor of Geneua, which I haue set downe, to the end wee may take notice of the censure euen of that Church wherein vsurie seemed most necessarie, and from which men haue taken their grea­test encouragement, to venture their soules vpon this sinne.

Take notice therefore (Christian Reader) I beseech thee, that thou do not mistake vs, and deceiue thine owne soule. That thou maist not mistake, I haue laboured to be as plain as I can: And that I might not ouerburthen or ensnare thy conscience, I haue iustified such contracts and dealings with money for money, as may stand vpon iust and equall grounds. The Pag. 19. contract of association or partnership, where both parties are partners in gaine and losse, both de­pending vpon diuine prouidence for a blessing: That law­full Pag. 20. interest which properly and truly is so called, when a mans money is forced or retained from him simply against his wil to his detriment; then to receiue satisfaction answe­rable to his damage: Pag. 20. 21. Buying & selling for time in those few cases premised: Pag. 27. The thankfull gratuitie returned by the borrower out of his gain freely, without any precedent [Page 154] contract or agreement for the same: That Pag. 23. 24. reall exchange, which standeth iustifiable vpon his owne grounds; if it be not poysoned, as commonly it is, with vsurie: Pag. 28. 29. Those equal considerations of courtesie, where one good turne requires another, without couenant for certaintie of cleere gaine in money or money worth: Pag. 97. Those assurances where there is some equall aduenture, and where the hand of God in the losse lighteth vpon both parties: Pag. 124. To borrow, vpon vsurie in such cases of necessitie, as are before expressed. Thus haue I yeelded as much as possibly I could, loth to intangle thy conscience, or to cast a snare vpon thee. And some fewe Diuines (I confesse) haue yeelded something more, then I i Pag. 61. 62. 63. can see good ground for. But that which I would haue thee to take especiall notice of, is, that an absolute coue­nant for the loane of thy money, for ten, or nine, or eight, or seuen, or sixe, is without warrant or authoritie, euen a­mongst those Diuines, who, vpon sifting and examining this point, haue concluded most fauourablie for thee. Alas poore soule, whither wilt thou turne thy selfe for succour when thy best friends forsake thee? What wilt thou plead for thy selfe when thou commest before the eternall Iudge vpon thy triall? How doest thou hope to die a Christian, if thou liue a Vsurer? Doest thou hope for remission in Christ Iesus? It must be then vpon thy true repentance, in abando­ning that sinne. Canst thou plead ignorance? Take heed it be not wilfull and affected ignorance, then is it double ini­quitie, which is more fearfull.

Be not obstinate then and wilfully ignorant: let not fil­thie lucre so blind thine eyes, that thou shouldest presume, either to defend or to practise that, vnder a pretence of ig­norance, for which thou shalt finde neither sound reason nor good authoritie; neither approbation of God in Scrip­ture, nor of any Christian Church, that is, or euer was vpon the face of the earth: look vnto it therfore, lest that fearful censure of our blessed Sauiour fall vpon thee, which fell on those accursed Iewes: Seeing they do not see, and hearing they Matth 13. vers. 13. 14. 15. doe not heare, neither vnderstand. So in them is fulfilled the [Page 155] prophecie of Esaias, which saith; By hearing ye shall heare and shall not vnderstand, and seeing yee shall see and shall not per­ceiue. For this peoples heart is waxed fat, and their eares are dull of hearing, and with their eyes they haue winked, lest they should see with their eies, and heare with their eares, and vnder­stand with their hearts, and should returne, that I might heale them.

A wofull censure: let him looke his conscience in that glasse, who will not looke into this point of vsurie for disquieting his conscience. I beseech the Father of hea­uen, by his spirit of grace, to dispossesse this age of that spirit of slumber, which maketh men like deafe adders, to stop their eares at the voice of so many Charmers.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.